{"meta":{"query_hash":"f07094155be0","filters":{"topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa"},"cohort_total":731,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":731,"exported":731,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f07094155be0","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Legal+Issues+in+South+Africa"},"results":[{"id":"W1012836559","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1209","title":"Implementation of Housing Rights in South Africa: Approaches and Strategies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eviction; Disadvantaged; Political science; Economic growth; Jurisprudence; Fair Housing Act; Displacement (psychology); Development economics; Business; Law; Civil rights; Economics","score_opus":0.11425690676276906,"score_gpt":0.38279155091087763,"score_spread":0.26853464414810857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1012836559","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12675676,0.01750179,0.029961595,0.42868966,0.00094568403,0.0014316429,0.000051372346,0.00007169867,0.39458972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93916386,0.007801758,0.012731381,0.01362101,0.00019624691,0.0007281319,0.000022751354,0.000022422373,0.025712386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922047,0.0042013004,0.00030374463,0.0004032064,0.00085695897,0.0020300387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99404526,0.0030747554,0.0007696193,0.00037262117,0.0006209388,0.001116691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0146704,0.0006787129,0.0004078895,0.0024884806,0.008608603,0.010522943,0.0023417585,0.007880311,0.0060560894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014757316,0.0004343799,0.00049413793,0.0016353817,0.02215107,0.0126028685,0.021086395,0.00554938,0.00033816087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010120818,0.00010279261,0.0012166852,0.00026304118,0.000009822425,0.00091633474,0.031140143,0.0004187436,0.0005464861,0.92166626,0.0037289124,0.039980624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008934612,0.00020829201,0.006409739,0.0036293217,0.000036617395,0.001035864,0.16058406,0.0016223354,0.0017504786,0.44282642,0.38173422,0.000073339594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010642168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0131241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0146704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011811323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026365824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08569759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W11550258","doi":"10.1002/mrm.1236","title":"A comparison of South African and Canadian anti-terrorism legislation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute","keywords":"Terrorism; Law; Duty; Political science; Legislation; Publicity; Democracy; Listing (finance); Presumption of innocence; Presumption; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.04988849936487587,"score_gpt":0.3452407630339255,"score_spread":0.2953522636690496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W11550258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40846932,0.0037059323,0.0015542742,0.012173658,0.00018912223,0.00018798973,0.0028748089,0.00011226011,0.5707326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94905156,0.0017714262,0.00168912,0.0012456381,0.000020096311,0.000066084336,0.00068549503,0.000040215033,0.045430366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961506,0.00040128708,0.00006655388,0.00015846115,0.0020922567,0.0011308589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959266,0.0009260406,0.00028273364,0.00018833886,0.0022505322,0.0004258042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022631083,0.00026643925,0.00018401885,0.0032138743,0.0057315347,0.0027432446,0.0007318572,0.000701533,0.011485135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009108755,0.00019389749,0.00025415252,0.003963974,0.0018827172,0.0006954531,0.0011515691,0.00097556086,0.00054005533],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006791808,0.00015901124,0.092556074,0.0011394755,0.0001494095,0.0014558063,0.03879462,0.0036760943,0.0066456054,0.39714605,0.13171655,0.32588205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003273152,0.000072387535,0.38779843,0.00042988025,0.000060872582,0.0004821077,0.025629075,0.0010452284,0.0030145382,0.0032349592,0.57809883,0.00010091071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9338077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97211444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9659709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034029156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04013265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24689996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W118265215","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2006/v9i2a2817","title":"Deference and Diffèrance: Judicial Review and the Perfect Gift","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Judicial deference; Economic Justice; Positivism; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Liberalism; Relation (database); Judicial restraint; Action (physics); Political science; Judicial activism; Politics","score_opus":0.010716278119482435,"score_gpt":0.30772149438429386,"score_spread":0.2970052162648114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W118265215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21302834,0.033883624,0.025558755,0.2751858,0.0010682924,0.000075646785,0.000062863386,0.00009866954,0.4510379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893784,0.0012489618,0.00067962694,0.0039485646,0.00025504318,0.000012733177,0.0000042009106,0.000007769329,0.0044647558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97970515,0.010699266,0.000996504,0.0014902552,0.005075687,0.0020331268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9673996,0.020378234,0.0036990873,0.0024795225,0.0037637085,0.002279922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01760363,0.00019742525,0.0004921518,0.002311952,0.007141216,0.010357843,0.0010584217,0.0055234837,0.0021534427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04598892,0.00026685314,0.0003176299,0.001446529,0.03902527,0.008888948,0.006183404,0.0043889116,0.00023479755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014247229,0.00000702979,0.00041372713,0.000030127749,0.000004144251,0.0001323485,0.002883462,0.00014048656,0.00008650612,0.9897635,0.0010553238,0.0054690223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057088317,0.00005877289,0.0023432083,0.00022398308,0.000016499536,0.00042414665,0.0030040168,0.0006472604,0.0003305353,0.92715037,0.06570593,0.00003820295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012850675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012538059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01760363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012474605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011859607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093098044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W124357938","doi":"","title":"Principles of South African Constitutional Law, Bernard Bekink : book review","year":2013,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Journal of South African Law / Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutional law; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Constitutional economics; Democracy; Scrutiny; Comparative law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.030024505623611114,"score_gpt":0.2864287503746599,"score_spread":0.25640424475104884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W124357938","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017034495,0.97073066,0.00030209124,0.010478712,0.002135157,0.000014138822,0.00004861539,0.000014210996,0.016106118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0038252247,0.95891243,0.00055568176,0.0037963022,0.002049889,0.00005124275,0.0001445941,0.000027115546,0.030637635],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999181,0.00018742039,0.000055513166,0.000080439095,0.00043353395,0.00006210898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988838,0.0005531428,0.000106913445,0.000039923136,0.0003545307,0.000061767336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000963601,0.00071453006,0.0007041546,0.0031386842,0.0012277372,0.0028124992,0.00073083444,0.0017643976,0.013341213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003945731,0.0005022165,0.00029912058,0.0069690146,0.00203013,0.004643397,0.0011370183,0.002910902,0.004736967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013466095,0.000021056954,0.00016634032,0.0027850172,0.000014619706,0.00010984666,0.00052903214,0.00028171838,0.00015844173,0.041390557,0.7347786,0.21975128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022894992,0.000003616099,0.00037750741,0.0015043685,0.000003386663,0.00012717792,0.00011258016,0.000025523423,0.000032614364,0.0042087096,0.9935981,0.0000042612323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008165041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010702403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013341213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031691978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072173555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044630826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W126668471","doi":"","title":"\"Charter\" Equality at Twenty: Reflections of a Card-carrying Member of the Court Party","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Member states; Business","score_opus":0.02897778122635856,"score_gpt":0.33878209491483047,"score_spread":0.3098043136884719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W126668471","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15127037,0.0007241112,0.0019244495,0.71896046,0.0042794268,0.00008901696,0.000046035886,0.000033961605,0.122672155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77892923,0.00034759354,0.00072168437,0.14666475,0.0008556956,0.000084857784,0.000017988728,0.00012062655,0.07225766],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97827244,0.010097183,0.0004045208,0.0017740122,0.001749924,0.007701987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98250854,0.008370202,0.00083153514,0.0006774473,0.002064901,0.005547349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020248773,0.00058068585,0.0008113643,0.0010471217,0.09203736,0.024089264,0.003974863,0.03573897,0.01249027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04939537,0.00093594386,0.0008860599,0.0011294961,0.039794695,0.015211174,0.016051454,0.075857826,0.0012818401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001111675,0.00017000998,0.0013204176,0.00003195569,0.000013492491,0.00278825,0.56542414,0.00015381887,0.00050640147,0.33503962,0.08616416,0.008276567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043424054,0.00009655903,0.001760318,0.00019779173,0.00002267943,0.00044437574,0.6190892,0.00032892195,0.00077958097,0.044451103,0.33267692,0.000109184824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08760585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.118242055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09203736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0142029105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026496323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17419183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W138268285","doi":"","title":"La battaglia legale por il same-sex marriage in Canada e Sudafrica: eguaglianza e dignità umana versus libertà religiosa","year":2004,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Giurisprudenza costituzionale","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.023613204354075375,"score_gpt":0.28204363567098767,"score_spread":0.2584304313169123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W138268285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9330871,0.0037835925,0.00011235048,0.02586962,0.00006896456,0.00003753223,0.00028544755,0.000004766921,0.03675064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98831123,0.0018549425,0.00013435427,0.0022023346,0.000017664066,0.000016702803,0.000053423286,0.0000042534766,0.0074050804],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984553,0.00014655598,0.000036645248,0.000070071175,0.00014708748,0.0011442722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834585,0.00043207617,0.00033167296,0.00004753926,0.0003463747,0.0004965273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011596533,0.0001671238,0.00027906027,0.0012473892,0.012104536,0.0031129182,0.0010308955,0.001569679,0.0063179317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003724857,0.0002670998,0.00020894226,0.0028598597,0.006293047,0.0013090145,0.00277086,0.0030827937,0.00016944791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017740505,0.0002816116,0.3593882,0.00029738926,0.000061532075,0.0037947043,0.31720534,0.00021592467,0.0011948496,0.22971928,0.01608402,0.071579725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047098103,0.00005864529,0.44473624,0.0006987399,0.00008026815,0.00088366366,0.462929,0.0002693588,0.00056664465,0.00543577,0.084227614,0.00006687712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98232794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029916003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029916003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07370669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21705681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480688557","doi":"10.17159/2413-3108/2011/v0i37a859","title":"On the record: Interview with Peter Tinsley, Executive Director of the Institute for Justice Sector Development, Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Crime Quarterly","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Agency (philosophy); Law; Political science; Executive director; Management; Criminal justice; Executive committee; Sociology; Public administration; Social science; Economics","score_opus":0.03420687557096986,"score_gpt":0.2653350629216637,"score_spread":0.23112818735069385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480688557","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009866836,0.0125068845,0.0003097208,0.8945406,0.011742365,0.00023175501,0.006403497,0.00011826619,0.0642802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.050045807,0.017078994,0.00068418274,0.44526932,0.0031399615,0.00051657285,0.002308179,0.00023280231,0.4807242],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762493,0.0002933796,0.00008552494,0.0002472413,0.0010243637,0.0007246173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858833,0.002018914,0.00059169123,0.00020308337,0.007246715,0.0040562134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020935216,0.0004750725,0.00062813447,0.0018177866,0.014467555,0.005269576,0.002095826,0.00409082,0.037950113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013542917,0.0004278714,0.00021112387,0.004803234,0.0020585498,0.0034498856,0.0017580439,0.009382414,0.007933868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055336336,0.000010932077,0.0009235728,0.00004774453,0.0000013215603,0.00011503715,0.0022252754,0.000011934755,0.00003021502,0.00042266946,0.99208164,0.0041241827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004781786,0.0000058010005,0.0043179677,0.0001576568,0.0000033336273,0.000081657294,0.017903062,0.000027974796,0.000054561893,0.00008650957,0.97733146,0.000025177475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9339341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96975136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9339341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039880823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.097192585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.289357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480722926","doi":"","title":"SWEAT: Engaging with Trafficking in Women in South Africa - An NGO Perspective","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); SWEAT; Gender studies; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Medicine; Art; Internal medicine; Visual arts","score_opus":0.028500495896318805,"score_gpt":0.2882858397152443,"score_spread":0.2597853438189255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480722926","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5938151,0.014290657,0.0006742522,0.13489923,0.0006569903,0.00024631261,0.00015624842,0.000023388195,0.25523785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9420981,0.010711229,0.00046144886,0.0111438865,0.0001029992,0.00013455271,0.000028145769,0.000031284813,0.03528851],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950427,0.0019391807,0.00008398682,0.00017418183,0.00039519274,0.0023647307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99430794,0.003263616,0.0005941081,0.00011816168,0.0005761951,0.0011400267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054657976,0.00081261556,0.00065054704,0.0039038886,0.077112004,0.012907386,0.0022731838,0.009300685,0.009866822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007835356,0.00052576396,0.0004263145,0.005695137,0.03334749,0.009034254,0.009815052,0.008652428,0.00042993552],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013980756,0.000029751523,0.0015582797,0.00013008596,0.0000030976264,0.0012333193,0.9495381,0.000025816593,0.00022982336,0.040017873,0.003193197,0.004026769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016518035,0.000007237957,0.0011890626,0.0001530334,0.0000030351746,0.00015985464,0.97383684,0.000009305037,0.0000583111,0.000984379,0.023591552,0.0000057251277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7002434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85620624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7002434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02799288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055755645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6030438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483718433","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v34i3.12000","title":"HUNG OUT TO DRY? ATTORNEY-CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY AND THE REPORTING DUTIES IMPOSED BY THE FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE CENTRE ACT 38 OF 2001","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Money laundering; Privilege (computing); Law; Professional conduct; Position (finance); Confidentiality; Commission; Business; Order (exchange); Legal profession; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.032096614025555255,"score_gpt":0.3345268899074748,"score_spread":0.30243027588191956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483718433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07195556,0.008419454,0.005322434,0.39029214,0.0011152338,0.00019867875,0.00038886708,0.00008007858,0.5222275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7748299,0.004335542,0.0047978503,0.09299213,0.00056921353,0.00038133402,0.00012529512,0.00005467332,0.12191402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97055954,0.012400398,0.0019467842,0.0019584731,0.0073059676,0.0058288593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96123374,0.025254043,0.005099346,0.0030502337,0.0039721285,0.0013905516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025279127,0.00027178848,0.0003603143,0.00063068507,0.008769122,0.01236513,0.0018816099,0.014805349,0.007625167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07373036,0.0006280898,0.00034655957,0.0012238141,0.0085356105,0.008983654,0.004077023,0.0094946055,0.0018077443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027431872,0.000025104144,0.0023878363,0.00006513985,0.0000039130978,0.00061983534,0.025190711,0.00009873097,0.00031637296,0.91251343,0.044699132,0.014052408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004385942,0.00007677862,0.013744869,0.0018331384,0.000034716646,0.0020062774,0.022372762,0.0009496807,0.0017741271,0.11161131,0.8453982,0.0001542052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0891791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10664461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0891791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009133022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02697743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17732006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485343341","doi":"10.25071/1920-7336.21261","title":"Interpretation Consistent with International Law? The Detention of Asylum Seekers in South Africa","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Refuge Canada s Journal on Refuge","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Political science; International law; Interpretation (philosophy); Accountability; Refugee; Government (linguistics); International human rights law","score_opus":0.017813356632237234,"score_gpt":0.2522633168598194,"score_spread":0.23444996022758216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485343341","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3136026,0.008054387,0.0037737463,0.501706,0.0010307751,0.00007710499,0.000047558126,0.000031433465,0.1716764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814895,0.0017992083,0.0004883785,0.011415439,0.00013035622,0.0000284114,0.000009461398,0.000022009217,0.0046172566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98695904,0.008519119,0.0008236341,0.0005163841,0.0009912702,0.0021906383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897933,0.0062763165,0.0019984192,0.00065332267,0.00066574593,0.0006129166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013585371,0.00027586002,0.000528424,0.0010307678,0.012115084,0.011933466,0.0013012481,0.007100008,0.0041140635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03264813,0.00047865184,0.00034020224,0.0014879304,0.028458983,0.0071880687,0.008674579,0.011283068,0.00040648493],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042502368,0.00002970065,0.003971155,0.00016916604,0.00001165048,0.003137481,0.37455255,0.00013297459,0.0007947795,0.594832,0.0076603554,0.01466567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004429432,0.00005634907,0.0074091186,0.002285726,0.000031212534,0.0018935425,0.6757248,0.0002796568,0.0010713687,0.13993025,0.17117864,0.000094964955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032051783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03557358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032051783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006868063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013227172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0718472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485560714","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v33i3.12130","title":"PROTECTING A WIFE FINANCIALLY AT THE TIME OF DIVORCE – A COMPARISON BETWEEN SOUTH AFRICAN WOMEN MARRIED IN TERMS OF SOUTH AFRICAN CIVIL LAW AND ISLAMIC LAW, WITH SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO THE MAHR","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wife; Islam; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Sharia; Family law; Marriage law; Sociology; Property (philosophy); Political science; Public law; History","score_opus":0.023699945893548076,"score_gpt":0.26153280056410455,"score_spread":0.23783285467055648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485560714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900699,0.0013730952,0.00006671261,0.0007108716,0.000018840858,0.000013148235,0.000021036742,4.2829623e-7,0.007725978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99707246,0.0015331213,0.000043145425,0.00014069652,0.000008691259,0.00000770489,0.000013030673,8.627616e-7,0.0011803135],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995054,0.00019449579,0.000034309727,0.00002547709,0.000093019415,0.0001472933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942744,0.00024950525,0.00015112734,0.000016169719,0.00006149229,0.000094324656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062579743,0.000107319065,0.000211681,0.0011707842,0.0025582195,0.0008683777,0.0002034621,0.00034615147,0.004159223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002803231,0.00013936871,0.00015702247,0.0011518609,0.0015114559,0.0009993907,0.0015012588,0.0004945983,0.00023269503],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049912586,0.0003542277,0.39905247,0.0005482866,0.00006253844,0.005763559,0.470737,0.00012297329,0.003145655,0.034184862,0.00122803,0.08430127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023639073,0.00053893594,0.41051182,0.00037796737,0.000031140735,0.0032748133,0.5587523,0.00009138327,0.0005238532,0.0016342524,0.024217408,0.00002254413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010489562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02329889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010489562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009812653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010948948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020856977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486401540","doi":"","title":"E-mail Communication for Provisional Sentence Summons","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of international commercial law and technology","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Summons; Law; Sentence; Statutory law; Legislation; Formality; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03855691653878103,"score_gpt":0.33199140144463163,"score_spread":0.2934344849058506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486401540","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043627013,0.004572465,0.036303777,0.045397688,0.0057485364,0.0008923058,0.0007256508,0.0009772888,0.86175525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60595113,0.0042563817,0.032931373,0.023608701,0.0037557355,0.0013012963,0.0010651809,0.00036741345,0.3267628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98076266,0.007039977,0.002115116,0.0010937222,0.0069502653,0.0020382397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9530917,0.027335199,0.0042114793,0.005998297,0.0072490373,0.0021143747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013188696,0.0003189891,0.00047129588,0.0014336584,0.004568375,0.009162979,0.0017114172,0.007065568,0.05309713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.069681026,0.0004614589,0.00042820477,0.0012319584,0.002827501,0.006034151,0.0050093667,0.0059197783,0.019826928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002660823,0.00027376105,0.002785641,0.00089144986,0.000012650098,0.003114176,0.006996356,0.00038854562,0.0045867627,0.60160625,0.19044363,0.1886347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038138132,0.00020918384,0.0046641454,0.0018003777,0.000019964753,0.0018687743,0.0034140819,0.00066000794,0.0039026309,0.029656386,0.953686,0.000080228325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017074293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00283335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05309713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020776866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008069732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17762756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488068905","doi":"","title":"Promoting Equality, Black Economic Empowerment, and the Future of Investment Rules","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Negotiation; Context (archaeology); Empowerment; Investment (military); Foreign direct investment; Political science; Promotion (chess); International trade; Economics; Development economics; Economic growth; Political economy; International economics; Law; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.008378454535069838,"score_gpt":0.29005831642055735,"score_spread":0.2816798618854875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488068905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13570951,0.0057847435,0.01131639,0.13150059,0.00039416744,0.00006633958,0.000030311357,0.00003057212,0.71516746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974531,0.0010053618,0.0018537639,0.005953848,0.00013014027,0.0000686829,0.000007281534,0.00001583189,0.016434094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939376,0.0034083484,0.00014666347,0.00052585726,0.00071814883,0.0012633762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964535,0.0019412368,0.00055238255,0.00040248243,0.00025066605,0.000399718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011435544,0.00029800987,0.0003915719,0.00069570076,0.010974271,0.008133963,0.00071249687,0.005112514,0.00433281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0097945025,0.00022272195,0.00030961502,0.0006514495,0.037660565,0.00883224,0.007974868,0.0077228886,0.000300252],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030188635,0.000004114489,0.00006387434,0.00000419406,5.549985e-7,0.000025474737,0.0023062008,0.000044617464,0.0000339492,0.99592125,0.00035681855,0.0012357443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002270036,0.000019588837,0.00051750627,0.00019609016,0.0000052189516,0.00007120306,0.004442057,0.00027906118,0.00034090003,0.90692675,0.08716293,0.000016039088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076366137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008565738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011435544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054888036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007914323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060477614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491810477","doi":"","title":"Doctrinal reform and post-contractual modifications in New Brunswick: Nav Canada v. Greater Fredricton Airport Authority Inc.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond University Research Portal (Bond University)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law; Public administration; Political science","score_opus":0.030728555104739496,"score_gpt":0.2906812519680911,"score_spread":0.2599526968633516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491810477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21772295,0.0059319246,0.001802465,0.06653219,0.00084227585,0.00052281324,0.00031687343,0.00007264896,0.70625585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8454441,0.0013063939,0.0011307816,0.02356381,0.000103937244,0.00022497404,0.00008005464,0.00002810911,0.12811781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99436235,0.0008751276,0.00021488035,0.0005670113,0.0017879984,0.002192593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979633,0.00071304815,0.00019200136,0.00017359878,0.0006415194,0.00031662677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031749227,0.00042430137,0.00028389852,0.0007016543,0.021332297,0.0070256633,0.0031596979,0.010808818,0.0038980057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008317481,0.00063173607,0.00039687532,0.0016659771,0.014707289,0.0021757176,0.0026702401,0.009739028,0.00033610116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006479342,0.00007695142,0.0030803184,0.000045160337,0.000012036815,0.0015355789,0.027106054,0.00043291744,0.0011794971,0.9297407,0.028142558,0.008583435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027836137,0.00013103832,0.033618197,0.00039785076,0.00009346659,0.0009356375,0.023004107,0.0016166938,0.003993106,0.06686195,0.8686899,0.00037962713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9649321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98408717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09435453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09435453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10183752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68459326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501446081","doi":"10.1080/00083968.2013.765279","title":"Apartheid vertigo: the rise in discrimination against Africans in South Africa","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vertigo; History; Geography; Political science; Development economics; Ethnology; Medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.042385470238760874,"score_gpt":0.2656439224648627,"score_spread":0.2232584522261018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501446081","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14754742,0.37891236,0.00013332964,0.43371794,0.0037576626,0.000040987718,0.0001414758,0.000011469473,0.035737336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73428756,0.23218837,0.0001697797,0.017961048,0.00133814,0.000060816426,0.00007997736,0.000025202959,0.013889137],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986343,0.0004498405,0.00005826992,0.00008294425,0.00022595513,0.00054870115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985091,0.0006956122,0.00025806006,0.00003623471,0.00013000153,0.00037102326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002364975,0.00044178552,0.00055555877,0.0016562609,0.007885603,0.0045600445,0.00077957485,0.0034359887,0.008058949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004293525,0.00037451473,0.00023882026,0.005462714,0.009167369,0.005372879,0.0057093087,0.003943269,0.0004538041],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017302948,0.00010074669,0.014060407,0.0034318175,0.00003877913,0.005398304,0.503186,0.0002255783,0.0015831288,0.14968361,0.12023548,0.20188314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003623726,0.00008837831,0.10485357,0.0068060015,0.000031722902,0.001892274,0.41451505,0.00009679189,0.0003407193,0.028425097,0.44284484,0.000069325935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07384078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14724965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07384078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004540929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010382498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14682198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1503997350","doi":"10.1057/palgrave.pm.5940180","title":"Alternative dispute resolution in the South African pension funds industry: An Ombudsman or a Tribunal?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pensions An International Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Pension; Jurisdiction; Dispute resolution; Law; Business; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.09769182420107722,"score_gpt":0.40027791841640825,"score_spread":0.302586094215331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1503997350","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23929642,0.011742021,0.011814751,0.5309303,0.002216049,0.00019428603,0.000076642726,0.00003196529,0.20369756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9577044,0.0018794873,0.0034198365,0.018648911,0.00064835546,0.000107950465,0.000019060712,0.000022748618,0.017549053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96270436,0.018089078,0.0021782722,0.0023968471,0.0048574144,0.009773961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9507694,0.033986192,0.0044808825,0.0025677038,0.004257496,0.0039382195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.058017734,0.0003690622,0.0010105569,0.0026739493,0.02586289,0.024460645,0.005132384,0.030883268,0.01385726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.116439745,0.0007666854,0.001072081,0.0037635625,0.020520493,0.022612007,0.01330229,0.020967284,0.000814929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047484522,0.000045839995,0.0013450568,0.00009063872,0.00002381761,0.00096572755,0.02624624,0.00022605924,0.00015518286,0.9480921,0.008873235,0.013888538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001682958,0.000084046726,0.0038324262,0.0015948497,0.00007561533,0.0011806196,0.107097104,0.002466438,0.00070039777,0.660272,0.22240649,0.00012162327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023433652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032966554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058017734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011957571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028033689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30683076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504007968","doi":"","title":"Die rekeningkundige erkenning van bates en verwante uitgawe deur niewinsgewende organisasies met verwysing na die NG Gemeentes in die Vrystaat","year":2008,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Christian Scholarship = Tydskrif vir Christelike Wetenskap","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Profit (economics); Business; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.05141962110380009,"score_gpt":0.3313686405080862,"score_spread":0.27994901940428607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504007968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08843675,0.029553441,0.051985305,0.15291515,0.002561713,0.00025545174,0.0003877924,0.0002784172,0.6736259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.696693,0.01915487,0.03131377,0.005060367,0.0007747051,0.0002492494,0.00033224394,0.00050418044,0.24591763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914386,0.004495622,0.00042485143,0.0007428481,0.002103505,0.0007945085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929264,0.0034097778,0.0010178488,0.0010247368,0.00086062076,0.00076061353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007916019,0.00046858148,0.00037392625,0.0014806604,0.005352849,0.015942603,0.001267679,0.0028005154,0.022923332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017219255,0.0004552482,0.00033999133,0.0017327005,0.013628416,0.010567686,0.007408408,0.004068188,0.0035973745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041078834,0.000062591105,0.0019110751,0.000522276,0.000018517712,0.0013318489,0.09111337,0.00056178827,0.0035211095,0.76475275,0.032086026,0.104077615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000677664,0.000009566879,0.001634313,0.00069108076,0.000005326624,0.0003808096,0.024572138,0.00025757385,0.0010278976,0.089154914,0.8822351,0.000024379215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014497024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017082788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022923332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065189376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00998852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076686144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507481612","doi":"","title":"Sex Discrimination, Accountability of Public Authorities, And the Public/Private Divide in Tort Law: An Analysis of Doe V. Metropolitan Toronto (Municipality) Commissioners of Police","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Accountability; Political science; Metropolitan area; Private law; Duty; Public law; Liability","score_opus":0.026372047064541618,"score_gpt":0.33954178063106283,"score_spread":0.3131697335665212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507481612","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8563935,0.0032573,0.00092922547,0.016712703,0.00006125938,0.00013544354,0.0002566463,0.000014087949,0.12223986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903724,0.0009961771,0.00013204578,0.0009528137,0.000043333384,0.000035638543,0.000048250226,0.000008344667,0.007410938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974201,0.00042983695,0.00005477474,0.00012579023,0.0005970587,0.0013725194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99695873,0.0013258294,0.00066809455,0.00011673814,0.0004116066,0.0005190666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001186701,0.00030114502,0.0005284857,0.0031291875,0.013835489,0.008326571,0.0014249621,0.0037331635,0.0044362703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033249108,0.00032099924,0.00050676946,0.0034036764,0.01660304,0.0024592117,0.0029326603,0.0030308852,0.00015377105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005104117,0.00010477654,0.04634339,0.00013921176,0.000039726765,0.0038231849,0.2231147,0.001400987,0.0006531656,0.7078052,0.0077731474,0.008751403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048176025,0.000100395584,0.30530107,0.00059357716,0.00015498584,0.0006765154,0.54559684,0.0034491606,0.0007647865,0.038720895,0.10447755,0.00011608723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94104546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96990955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10202827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10202827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038024582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7402704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508301403","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4500","title":"A Wavering Commitment? Administrative Independence and Collaborative Governance in Ontario’s Adjudicative Tribunals Accountability Legislation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Statute; Legislation; Independence (probability theory); Corporate governance; Public administration; Legislature; Political science; Transparency (behavior); Government (linguistics); Law; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.05378763993765281,"score_gpt":0.37590865109594346,"score_spread":0.32212101115829067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508301403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18256699,0.0019705691,0.004363428,0.1625088,0.0004646378,0.0001720531,0.00010365691,0.00004485043,0.64780486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9062501,0.00070045766,0.0012709519,0.00645075,0.00007859966,0.00008097321,0.000028925184,0.000021181582,0.08511799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.990669,0.0018558035,0.00030482665,0.00056315435,0.0027430686,0.0038641396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929376,0.0025756005,0.00071532483,0.00046261874,0.0014052341,0.0019036365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051724864,0.0001718748,0.00021805154,0.0006791979,0.033666227,0.010573936,0.001529755,0.004010345,0.0048250165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010847216,0.00045597894,0.0002728899,0.0015710576,0.023032727,0.0038613891,0.005920056,0.0058395066,0.0003272709],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021363614,0.000036077876,0.0044261524,0.00005000965,0.0000069137386,0.0006947316,0.06587778,0.0003716804,0.00036409436,0.88629663,0.028841874,0.013012696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005518034,0.00004005808,0.029246569,0.00032615464,0.000023517981,0.00025170585,0.06898221,0.0010265118,0.0005477644,0.06315713,0.8362306,0.00011252859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95389867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9839914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9044102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09558984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12302759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6935561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508647693","doi":"","title":"Emerging trends among the South African inmate population and persons subject to community corrections","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta criminologica","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Demography; Quarter (Canadian coin); Prison; Prison population; Psychology; Geography; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.07039650726743392,"score_gpt":0.335052983389006,"score_spread":0.2646564761215721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508647693","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9742051,0.0072578886,0.0001662757,0.005060381,0.000098473014,0.00004298543,0.0063257143,0.000029583263,0.0068135792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818371,0.0120384395,0.00040032782,0.0006984682,0.00013915711,0.00007184642,0.0021643469,0.000009636579,0.0026406322],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996971,0.00004458237,0.000038026446,0.000046880014,0.000066997265,0.00010643007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906045,0.00007485728,0.00043250318,0.000014514955,0.00022149611,0.00019609135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038758916,0.00017353885,0.00017347035,0.0020741958,0.0005531871,0.0008126744,0.00039463714,0.00056158926,0.004626432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015836888,0.00015867525,0.0002681127,0.0029114073,0.00035149307,0.0016020539,0.00079694524,0.00069335004,0.00078224816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006793528,0.00006374556,0.9607202,0.00037978104,0.00002831648,0.0006504823,0.0041116006,0.00013464998,0.00076206453,0.00096248486,0.005393418,0.02672535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001415925,0.000039958995,0.9870613,0.00016057606,0.000007358431,0.00058961555,0.004941518,0.00011816572,0.00008889987,0.00007276245,0.0069110114,0.0000073234687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034265697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04635651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034265697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010265538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010027556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06813252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510579985","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v32i1.12319","title":"AT LAST A SOUTH AFRICAN PROPER LAW OF DELICT Burchell v Anglin 2010 3 SA 48 (ECG)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Delict; Law; Common law; Locus (genetics); Haploinsufficiency; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Comparative law; Private law; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.027810237544735033,"score_gpt":0.2834699522834022,"score_spread":0.25565971473866717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510579985","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059717212,0.0075722425,0.0027180586,0.08954744,0.0046914266,0.00047624751,0.00074575766,0.00018701275,0.83434457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27262497,0.002009555,0.0016883486,0.11098775,0.00063247024,0.00036264714,0.00025352417,0.0000819769,0.61135876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838686,0.0003201108,0.00010621387,0.0003254266,0.00034399517,0.00051747705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991942,0.00035722877,0.000079948404,0.000071321374,0.00020233689,0.00009498618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014375993,0.0004162478,0.00025529665,0.0005078594,0.004586125,0.0029397237,0.00084828364,0.0076251742,0.017715726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035295663,0.00050786935,0.0005016878,0.00041108145,0.0027191732,0.0019623057,0.0023718972,0.007827064,0.003008874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007889102,0.00006293413,0.0034543616,0.00031844058,0.000024847348,0.0025361197,0.010460467,0.0001567371,0.0026770302,0.72297615,0.2291513,0.02810272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026374915,0.00006498214,0.0058739767,0.00042111697,0.000026157686,0.00084896805,0.0016072439,0.00012046384,0.00084050203,0.016590187,0.9735274,0.00005270339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049448002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12850367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049448002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040964885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005199207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098320365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512343341","doi":"","title":"Consent and Coercion in the Law of Rape in South Africa: A Feminist Transformative Approach","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Transformative learning; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Gender studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04301952484605037,"score_gpt":0.2970025262024348,"score_spread":0.2539830013563844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512343341","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2187953,0.01810881,0.012722561,0.26731384,0.00086092495,0.00040992134,0.0001224611,0.000029906358,0.48163635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810666,0.0034669128,0.0017742317,0.003252009,0.0001226196,0.00010781628,0.000009545651,0.00001601006,0.010184335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890224,0.0078121037,0.00019193057,0.00037707918,0.0007749469,0.0018214693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97643864,0.020985458,0.0007337508,0.00054993876,0.0008138877,0.00047822652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018026887,0.00074206083,0.000733884,0.0029197896,0.025646675,0.01392402,0.0027079813,0.009201025,0.004843373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023330556,0.0005854292,0.0005122591,0.0028069376,0.1217748,0.010207426,0.008137684,0.011095199,0.00019222274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010270742,0.000014710193,0.0001371152,0.000058252124,0.0000023374785,0.0002647508,0.117304854,0.00007857863,0.00012856419,0.8789923,0.0006629399,0.0023453296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005066842,0.000037305224,0.0015475943,0.00089159876,0.000031939355,0.0005329428,0.349311,0.0005056346,0.001154246,0.5416647,0.10420589,0.00006632463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30088744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27169257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30088744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03158883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0509626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59827214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512674864","doi":"","title":"Interdicts seeking to preserve constitutional rights - of losing litigants, interim interdicts pending appeal, and lessons from Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Interim; Political science; Constitution; High Court; Government (linguistics); Status quo; Legislation; Supreme court; Position (finance); Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.029423678572347813,"score_gpt":0.3192401797264142,"score_spread":0.28981650115406643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512674864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10358439,0.0053428467,0.0026290023,0.21419272,0.00067300623,0.00010632837,0.00013331136,0.00006657947,0.67327183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90611815,0.0036258702,0.0023012997,0.026431821,0.00016750958,0.00005844243,0.00005224949,0.000068135596,0.061176475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908602,0.0008405187,0.00021627021,0.00090360217,0.0025192257,0.004660108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928219,0.0023856894,0.00030335062,0.00044316362,0.0023418698,0.0017040983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005894077,0.00040793343,0.00072992855,0.0014210511,0.033870302,0.015580501,0.0040548733,0.009156436,0.00894759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021093415,0.00048688223,0.00077004917,0.0019176678,0.020402998,0.0059301243,0.005933046,0.020668045,0.00048674858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006848529,0.0000439332,0.0023107792,0.000062660714,0.000022339404,0.0010820075,0.009461044,0.0006057274,0.0003144986,0.9476062,0.021653252,0.016769102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016703489,0.00009609834,0.013531534,0.0012109145,0.00028367498,0.00082978304,0.05704604,0.0042567626,0.002208376,0.43988934,0.48009673,0.00038364882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9751184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9904986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08723085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08723085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15510774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63290703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513219015","doi":"","title":"From Delgamuukw to Ritchersveld - are land claims in Canadian and South African law comparable?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review = Stellenbosch Regstydskrif","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033766206916251665,"score_gpt":0.31571966634487525,"score_spread":0.2819534594286236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513219015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50917315,0.011411712,0.00046766922,0.039529216,0.00022635233,0.00009956051,0.0024284918,0.000030487588,0.4366334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738714,0.0021483572,0.00017836937,0.002655577,0.000040981315,0.00003095728,0.0003684787,0.000022094231,0.020683907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99434656,0.00036391176,0.00010509664,0.00046869364,0.0016841654,0.0030315847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99255544,0.001529285,0.0007405185,0.00038164714,0.003129275,0.00166385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002750413,0.00027937308,0.00054640486,0.005693482,0.015442672,0.009752562,0.001650718,0.0022839557,0.02035927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016693193,0.00028989042,0.00048161164,0.009037648,0.010290044,0.0042289984,0.0039641787,0.0035391357,0.00083403854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023708452,0.00009961086,0.081309125,0.00028492988,0.00007888326,0.0009701349,0.09158489,0.0003733635,0.00055650796,0.71862614,0.044239998,0.06163925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006808427,0.000052124866,0.52236795,0.0013307879,0.00018417991,0.00038754477,0.16400774,0.0010652407,0.0007386254,0.044044957,0.2655825,0.00017019064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9903273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99483985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.105368406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.105368406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08360243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76450485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513770463","doi":"10.1080/02255189.2007.9669185","title":"The Big-Push Approach to African Development and Local Capacity Building: Understanding the Issues","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développement","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Capacity building; Poverty reduction; Poverty; Local Development; Political science; Economic growth; Environmental planning; Business; Regional science; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.13528584232179847,"score_gpt":0.29406335789773413,"score_spread":0.15877751557593567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513770463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09802619,0.013639548,0.07237597,0.20955576,0.00035286509,0.00021430453,0.00010148664,0.000053523836,0.6056804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840146,0.0027336564,0.0057594064,0.0012159864,0.00007581232,0.000101995116,0.000008629257,0.0000105211275,0.0060794684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687374,0.002251201,0.00004927198,0.00010669077,0.00025334308,0.00046562744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949077,0.003609507,0.0003321578,0.00022551136,0.00029054267,0.0006345406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063677356,0.00056458084,0.00043200917,0.0023232861,0.006104594,0.0101723075,0.001402976,0.002594885,0.0075469376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057304804,0.000318973,0.00034457367,0.0022234789,0.0352459,0.01091011,0.006511015,0.0040194993,0.00027980146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015365686,0.000008018111,0.00012794376,0.00003291403,0.0000010514854,0.0000808178,0.0030336606,0.00052196346,0.00002152932,0.99385625,0.000407756,0.0019065228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061342816,0.000010835092,0.00042790428,0.00029845766,0.0000029828634,0.00010496741,0.03328117,0.0016239835,0.00010403092,0.92260057,0.041530814,0.000008191199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077297688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009106492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010240276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010240276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010165944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07429874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513938139","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v34i2.12036","title":"CURRENT ISSUES OF CONSTITUTIONAL DAMAGES LITIGATION: A CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS OF RECENT COMMONWEALTH DECISIONS","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Commonwealth; Law; Plaintiff; Supreme court; Political science; Charter; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.07882269416384635,"score_gpt":0.4100255463537328,"score_spread":0.33120285218988643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513938139","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5615671,0.03756386,0.0026157666,0.14669864,0.00055989885,0.00016907117,0.0004177797,0.00004223403,0.25036553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98170704,0.008081225,0.00032164992,0.0057141734,0.00024876095,0.00004926949,0.000077005614,0.000035203528,0.0037657246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98702,0.0054582753,0.0006608927,0.001210593,0.0024074416,0.0032427562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96507794,0.028418291,0.003318281,0.00072771584,0.0015347636,0.00092305895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010673018,0.00031299007,0.00054182566,0.005893496,0.021833215,0.022874499,0.0022995633,0.007200108,0.005051515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029372923,0.0006388528,0.00068877375,0.010877638,0.031529695,0.009951075,0.008029154,0.010983575,0.0002465702],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041030675,0.000063538944,0.007912948,0.00031981198,0.000029753164,0.0029149917,0.2724061,0.000581554,0.00045974687,0.6929877,0.008372933,0.013909928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000219907,0.00008065433,0.046232548,0.0019269853,0.000059601025,0.0009032611,0.4743288,0.00050147594,0.0006245702,0.09140949,0.38374647,0.00016415882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1586835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28791538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1586835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033056792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01782402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3155197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521091668","doi":"10.71781/2051","title":"Les conjoints de fait au Québec : perspectives féministes pour un encadrement légal","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.009012687587170604,"score_gpt":0.21562016667569872,"score_spread":0.2066074790885281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1521091668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56100184,0.0260427,0.004955703,0.11125104,0.00046499562,0.0001045047,0.00070900115,0.000039738585,0.29543042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9518384,0.0055311373,0.00080864783,0.0026057344,0.000036453686,0.000045625336,0.000084867606,0.0000144651785,0.039034706],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977301,0.0009125213,0.00003786327,0.00024815326,0.00045819828,0.0006132563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99557173,0.001961934,0.00031701414,0.0001248755,0.001345762,0.00067866733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033161447,0.00041353604,0.00037343625,0.0023953584,0.026700322,0.009360965,0.0018572075,0.0026903462,0.010573178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004968201,0.00033747376,0.00029426336,0.00440163,0.020362854,0.0040596845,0.0025611094,0.0034664266,0.0002800395],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053830336,0.000049083945,0.026866956,0.00024878222,0.000026420787,0.0012252266,0.6550631,0.0006803789,0.00044308457,0.25684375,0.016554568,0.041944932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006997559,0.000020417936,0.034321006,0.0006796732,0.000028479348,0.00016733407,0.76048154,0.00041305705,0.0002445011,0.009442229,0.19413897,0.000055831533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9886769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99554634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.098148175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.098148175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10759279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71211815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526298774","doi":"","title":"Contextualizing inclusive education : evaluating old and new international perspectives","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Equity (law); Inclusion (mineral); Globalization; Context (archaeology); Global education; Sociology; Political science; Comparative education; Gender studies; Social science; Higher education; Pedagogy; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.0476763407526239,"score_gpt":0.42379584369117257,"score_spread":0.3761195029385487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526298774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07873662,0.11352624,0.007922615,0.09047238,0.0034025188,0.0004923011,0.00044133543,0.00006551719,0.70494044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8309309,0.1136335,0.009619616,0.014457628,0.0016007654,0.0012402056,0.00060885516,0.0001934337,0.027715119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99232143,0.0055516693,0.0002772919,0.00038289255,0.00093285093,0.0005338685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793658,0.016591629,0.000714122,0.0008092202,0.0016003677,0.0009188157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013282272,0.0008113922,0.00078203576,0.005444695,0.009402324,0.024071392,0.0013416371,0.002377869,0.016094573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01639591,0.00027180664,0.00059087964,0.008899957,0.021351177,0.02378248,0.015345947,0.004659312,0.0007859666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007311635,0.00008717139,0.0031031775,0.0018008832,0.000023894576,0.00034413798,0.26551235,0.0003041362,0.00014681967,0.6268825,0.02318404,0.07853785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012623157,0.00007292952,0.0030198642,0.007890286,0.00003760422,0.0001373937,0.5396866,0.00013328891,0.00024814453,0.0696368,0.37910601,0.000018364572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054580243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011371928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024071392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012671695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006305494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091939986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527372535","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v25i2.4614","title":"I CAN SEE CLEARLY NOW: VIDEOCONFERENCE HEARINGS AND THE LEGAL LIMIT ON HOW TRIBUNALS ALLOCATE RESOURCES","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Limit (mathematics); Videoconferencing; Political science; Law; Business; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics; Telecommunications; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04114657717530011,"score_gpt":0.3268015283295251,"score_spread":0.28565495115422496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1527372535","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046374388,0.0071377796,0.004544625,0.49285808,0.0018429575,0.00006240311,0.00021370017,0.00008920174,0.44687688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67865074,0.0058486746,0.00253315,0.09638189,0.0009785187,0.000092662485,0.00017217963,0.00012320458,0.215219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687093,0.0006410305,0.000057112637,0.00033996272,0.0008710992,0.0012198928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736446,0.0009475931,0.00019311282,0.00015794845,0.0007058353,0.00063107716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026852922,0.00027352653,0.00026430664,0.0006068338,0.0152783,0.013060449,0.0025905801,0.0062993597,0.024193674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075723305,0.00021778226,0.00024133654,0.00094288087,0.016568158,0.008297168,0.0037944955,0.0070076967,0.002260855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032543674,0.0000436512,0.003299851,0.00011161212,0.0000047777307,0.00073294673,0.0455345,0.00016314055,0.0005804606,0.68378645,0.21667095,0.049039043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000125252855,0.000023331348,0.0048506586,0.00036935628,0.000009677711,0.00022795824,0.060219135,0.00030048663,0.000430386,0.043605395,0.88989925,0.0000517713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6545018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7427675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6545018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021400372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019102603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6950658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529279683","doi":"","title":"State v. Zuma: The Future of Constitutional Democracy in South Africa","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Presidency; Democracy; Victory; Constitutionalism; Independence (probability theory); Law; Political science; State (computer science); Judicial independence; Rule of law; Constitutional law; Constitutional review; Separation of powers; Freedom of the press; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.009206684646540755,"score_gpt":0.2723809467700299,"score_spread":0.26317426212348916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1529279683","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20219672,0.052629527,0.0038249763,0.45186752,0.00094745844,0.00008520744,0.00007473574,0.000031430507,0.28834248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97380537,0.007949327,0.0006127416,0.008328992,0.000206788,0.00004665538,0.000012932573,0.000013559839,0.00902364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969414,0.0014531764,0.000088428686,0.00025283868,0.00037095972,0.0008932523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970747,0.0020093936,0.0003192486,0.00015449562,0.00013140703,0.00031063118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060708867,0.00019428057,0.00023024093,0.0010347221,0.010729319,0.0069297827,0.00050948956,0.004299953,0.0054434864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010078948,0.000272348,0.00026645247,0.0011574748,0.017702619,0.009862444,0.0047298414,0.007546801,0.00022555972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013403535,0.000007596643,0.00040217393,0.000055899218,0.0000026483465,0.00030606112,0.015599949,0.00016544822,0.00028989694,0.97132045,0.0028955445,0.008940861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034874218,0.000054245564,0.0036763102,0.0007924549,0.000010931972,0.0003973388,0.03247971,0.0005140152,0.00067649124,0.60257775,0.35874674,0.000039175713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014773743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020778392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014773743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008937718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011888598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064847946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541669179","doi":"","title":"R v. Sinclair: Balancing Individual Rights and Societal Interests Outside of Section 1 of the Charter","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Charter; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Business","score_opus":0.012095356520733977,"score_gpt":0.2832377083204115,"score_spread":0.27114235179967755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541669179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014745901,0.004168325,0.008654219,0.16018716,0.0070575704,0.00038824521,0.0004762472,0.0005001057,0.8038222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28928137,0.002563945,0.012220721,0.22862716,0.0035074763,0.00088285893,0.00022415159,0.00032927716,0.46236303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99016005,0.003393394,0.0005473757,0.0014063813,0.0024167811,0.0020761034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923235,0.004803331,0.00047790588,0.00060438033,0.0014304406,0.00036043243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014221684,0.0008050009,0.00084397587,0.0010180038,0.007795327,0.007130227,0.0025753498,0.03180266,0.011234429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031694587,0.0010669433,0.000918853,0.0010533636,0.0072850487,0.0042273984,0.0030330662,0.015274807,0.0043121097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038633596,0.00002100382,0.00042808274,0.000050239432,0.0000110641295,0.0002918355,0.0013418909,0.00029861118,0.00036161844,0.80652297,0.18289486,0.007739378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001620915,0.000099137374,0.0026321427,0.00065102713,0.00007188076,0.00052524154,0.0015021559,0.0016161229,0.0022584316,0.30400106,0.68628305,0.00019768822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06868525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08604366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06868525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004205282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026028156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13657087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542062513","doi":"10.21991/c9hm16","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM IN SOUTH AFRICA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography; Development economics; Economics","score_opus":0.05168537418911047,"score_gpt":0.2833531090796398,"score_spread":0.23166773489052933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542062513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42754495,0.051708754,0.0019769936,0.1024191,0.00074919296,0.00052637263,0.0002665116,0.00004853967,0.41475964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9637748,0.0070749237,0.0009104147,0.004235336,0.00014548343,0.00017113861,0.000039428007,0.000018719846,0.023629893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668103,0.0011827219,0.00017329441,0.00021450613,0.00031938835,0.0014289973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979372,0.0010302132,0.0003016787,0.00017112422,0.0002528261,0.00030705048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003812579,0.00045200015,0.00058532844,0.0023660362,0.013483477,0.0065967613,0.0007359167,0.0030027865,0.00863765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077496124,0.00048507834,0.0004006594,0.0038927048,0.009937958,0.00352258,0.0061296327,0.004897921,0.00033889493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007514247,0.00005559353,0.0016974305,0.0004678282,0.00003107802,0.0012045783,0.026214521,0.0007480377,0.0015605075,0.93934107,0.0057444945,0.022859812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023540061,0.00018657307,0.044821385,0.0022980561,0.00014867628,0.0008332896,0.046300314,0.00093996327,0.0025461055,0.23136407,0.67021525,0.000110894616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05872547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10440405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05872547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018586572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026672853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13485569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545795616","doi":"","title":"The right to address the court in the language of one's choice","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Codicillus","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Multiculturalism; Political science; Economic Justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.0256943357895385,"score_gpt":0.32546961414151826,"score_spread":0.29977527835197976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545795616","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04252453,0.005135736,0.01441263,0.18114398,0.0012103016,0.00012067523,0.0000750305,0.000059348236,0.75531775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.884265,0.0023283183,0.004418039,0.044470206,0.00093590695,0.00014678141,0.00003667758,0.00007837395,0.063320644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831608,0.006894983,0.00094401103,0.0020229316,0.0038742004,0.0031030308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98454154,0.0095465025,0.0010276479,0.0012508829,0.002436941,0.0011964716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015199902,0.0003772263,0.0007999079,0.0010099337,0.01485754,0.012296685,0.0017393501,0.014618156,0.0064928266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029466888,0.00045240187,0.00048353142,0.00097266806,0.041711528,0.008425071,0.008473533,0.0134154875,0.0013990226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008425274,0.000008832644,0.00024131133,0.00001887504,0.000005475857,0.0001751024,0.008303237,0.00005570389,0.00028121812,0.9839485,0.0037133486,0.0032400142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053894437,0.00006870344,0.00076309574,0.00066304347,0.000037380818,0.000907437,0.011787259,0.00034425745,0.0010498603,0.6277214,0.35650802,0.000095574134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024222076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02571313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024222076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004245597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019392293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080385685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545819739","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1485","title":"Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium v. Minister of Justice: Sex Equality and the Attack on R. v. Butler","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Political science; Criminology","score_opus":0.05443311413666295,"score_gpt":0.35233492321334,"score_spread":0.297901809076677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545819739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002536754,0.057636812,0.0006716551,0.3807814,0.009109963,0.000045970806,0.00010704314,0.00004288033,0.5490675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08698909,0.016926063,0.00053455314,0.15770493,0.003865612,0.00010388646,0.000043282867,0.000079721816,0.7337529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987552,0.00043591805,0.000048711096,0.00017214596,0.00035302897,0.00023499288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884903,0.0007531629,0.000052399937,0.00007535681,0.00015251453,0.00011748838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018539177,0.0003922012,0.0003496802,0.0005938844,0.009732133,0.0057934145,0.0009265495,0.011591854,0.016815674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005576746,0.00040668782,0.00036005126,0.00067004934,0.008370193,0.0049873544,0.0026236186,0.010969288,0.0021578644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010665137,0.000007848223,0.00010193709,0.000041821375,0.0000024667092,0.0001269367,0.0013285559,0.000031984808,0.00006863459,0.5643979,0.42678174,0.007099511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009934609,0.0000066145253,0.000296526,0.00026279094,0.0000037781565,0.00008115791,0.0011386952,0.000043154425,0.00009019735,0.041375488,0.95668364,0.00000796991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04564809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.105116375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9543519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005979967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007174222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09076482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551700116","doi":"","title":"Feticide : creating a statutory crime in South African law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review = Stellenbosch Regstydskrif","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Jurisprudence; Law; Legislature; Abortion; Political science; Common law; Position (finance); Criminology; Sociology; Pregnancy; Business","score_opus":0.03016946507801467,"score_gpt":0.3170328084844136,"score_spread":0.28686334340639896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551700116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46239546,0.032115355,0.0062994324,0.077605315,0.0004423037,0.00023226265,0.000062638566,0.000023523964,0.42082375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753493,0.0055851354,0.0008420473,0.006649299,0.00008193188,0.0000760846,0.000015273505,0.000006602951,0.011394345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995492,0.0022867722,0.0002267524,0.0003166084,0.0007616663,0.0009161385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974559,0.0016880203,0.00049091876,0.00009552024,0.00016090972,0.00010877059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037685295,0.0003242726,0.000302079,0.0019019337,0.008273926,0.004891701,0.0009202509,0.007187255,0.0025544723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064142146,0.00040272277,0.00032072517,0.0014643429,0.01670999,0.003562304,0.0052345293,0.0054575433,0.0002048457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000080446025,0.000015684718,0.0015065675,0.0001050947,0.000003902921,0.0028093436,0.021523163,0.000120026496,0.00034898418,0.96406865,0.001508353,0.007982255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008086848,0.00022986873,0.026964344,0.0047289687,0.00007647148,0.010781183,0.11861462,0.001330174,0.0044090566,0.40011525,0.4325426,0.00012666901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02001571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03316931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02001571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058249724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009181323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04226333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551862032","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1019085","title":"Fragile Stability: Post-Apartheid South Africa","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.0171077049062973,"score_gpt":0.28253641187758183,"score_spread":0.2654287069712845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551862032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93431884,0.0058877952,0.00022210699,0.0165959,0.00017502026,0.00009818636,0.00031955537,0.0000083525365,0.042374343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912485,0.0016407857,0.00009270359,0.00084337976,0.000026177791,0.000039310897,0.000051685372,0.0000051970196,0.006052239],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991886,0.00013369,0.00003571336,0.00004577594,0.000055596345,0.00054060604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991049,0.00028766328,0.00023196696,0.000036720812,0.000079447855,0.00025917473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009579253,0.00031334627,0.00036366982,0.0011648762,0.008204484,0.0038642243,0.0006215613,0.0018597399,0.012075433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025134115,0.00024118702,0.00016118976,0.002910296,0.0044705844,0.0030083621,0.0056569944,0.0023744262,0.00028960477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006469104,0.00017439025,0.050769065,0.0012872872,0.000069826754,0.021990348,0.45790803,0.0004950601,0.004793654,0.3712993,0.012072209,0.07849395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007890778,0.00026272534,0.32922623,0.0012396493,0.00006648239,0.0035278643,0.4460583,0.00023833293,0.0012676872,0.027256628,0.19069585,0.000081354374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06321503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20985979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06321503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069372193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00950568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12569416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553654399","doi":"10.1353/arw.2005.0125","title":"John S. Saul. The Next Liberation Struggle: Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy in Southern Africa. Toronto: Between the Lines/Scottsville: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press/New York: Monthly Review Press/London: The Merlin Press, 2005; 341 pp. Index. $21.95. Paper.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Studies Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Democracy; Socialism; Economic history; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; History; Law; Politics; Communism","score_opus":0.058068844010640566,"score_gpt":0.3158088508833773,"score_spread":0.25774000687273674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553654399","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000082859486,0.95311695,0.000083539075,0.032016885,0.0034630739,0.000017829036,0.0002060329,0.000018716488,0.010994103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034514286,0.9546539,0.00028094603,0.005704754,0.0031045224,0.000052293246,0.00016950109,0.000042284722,0.03254019],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990269,0.00028524562,0.00008098099,0.00009722484,0.00041545942,0.00009417973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99673826,0.0014550755,0.00031958462,0.00007396899,0.0010121355,0.0004009009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014877256,0.0020024325,0.001171953,0.0044786073,0.002565419,0.003289757,0.001706758,0.0038384174,0.038534354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004381985,0.0008360855,0.000598495,0.008339154,0.0022153566,0.008581075,0.001551304,0.00402741,0.016150108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019060622,0.000009774658,0.0001020867,0.00076095,0.000012117841,0.00003617105,0.0003143322,0.000034420416,0.000030807452,0.0034190621,0.9640355,0.031225802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002775019,0.000020063626,0.002328787,0.0027251437,0.000026766671,0.00010189568,0.000964286,0.000030720817,0.000093233146,0.008854809,0.98480046,0.000026002792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055740666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13627517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055740666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003705078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059118336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12891024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554917978","doi":"10.1080/00083968.2012.659577","title":"Cleaning the wharves: Pilferage, bribery, and social connections on the Durban docks in the 1950s","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); DOCK; Wage; Business; Resistance (ecology); Labour economics; Sociology; Demographic economics; Economics; Social science; Engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.06357483326005672,"score_gpt":0.2882485465159669,"score_spread":0.22467371325591015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554917978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9779287,0.0025727763,0.00008522098,0.0019611635,0.000055687324,0.000008267604,0.00002074064,0.000003550268,0.017363904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953395,0.001197726,0.00004773568,0.00015388912,0.000013208726,0.00000667677,0.0000081280505,0.0000043327036,0.0032288122],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987471,0.000575157,0.000038233466,0.0001019563,0.00016805137,0.00036956387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988967,0.00041910898,0.00031612118,0.000041208375,0.00010500161,0.0002217322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012520476,0.00048083797,0.00051445153,0.0021214776,0.015940607,0.0040996685,0.0007698287,0.0014274917,0.0049025994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034015663,0.00053088815,0.00013606968,0.0018650681,0.01588643,0.0033831159,0.00620509,0.0022795345,0.00043560256],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015968359,0.000013782214,0.008098934,0.00003565788,0.0000027233914,0.0010420122,0.9827718,0.0000117770915,0.00023770047,0.003026125,0.00043145192,0.004312164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017550187,0.00001979264,0.0256364,0.00015709564,0.0000029694013,0.00035385543,0.9512336,0.000012148924,0.0000789757,0.0003633807,0.022129035,0.000011000799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11052193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27227846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11052193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005250701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016209834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2197572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555915201","doi":"","title":"Legitimizing Elections Through the Regulation of Campaign Financing: A Comparative Constitutional Analysis and Hope for South Africa","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College international and comparative law review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.12079174063485275,"score_gpt":0.3611035223263063,"score_spread":0.24031178169145356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555915201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2846879,0.008843477,0.011478905,0.059589133,0.00016262573,0.00016465806,0.0001050792,0.000026241554,0.63494194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919194,0.0011554832,0.000716295,0.0012878969,0.00005152088,0.000056731642,0.000009885963,0.000007977811,0.004794742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99505275,0.0026930154,0.00012176509,0.00033537592,0.00051798776,0.0012790876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925228,0.0054522934,0.0006518406,0.0006246966,0.0005106757,0.00023776386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010449015,0.0002664789,0.0004811101,0.0028035198,0.0066912286,0.009926245,0.0011535975,0.0039645005,0.0073979804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016045243,0.0003695891,0.0006136561,0.001982832,0.017350338,0.007921676,0.004461824,0.0042389836,0.00024529628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008879685,0.00000514201,0.00016518842,0.00001837145,0.0000030312326,0.00004998895,0.0011425279,0.00016957328,0.00008487729,0.99667716,0.00018403461,0.0014912094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015535201,0.0001072183,0.004518213,0.0005196993,0.00010909905,0.00021871697,0.011380234,0.0027381687,0.0019590582,0.851285,0.12695365,0.00005559654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012727662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012211387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012727662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0102534015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073046517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07439399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1562861504","doi":"10.25071/1920-7336.36486","title":"Addressing Xenophobia in the Equality Courts of South Africa","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Refuge Canada s Journal on Refuge","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Xenophobia; Racism; Refugee law; Political science; Inequality; Oppression; Law; State (computer science); Refugee; Human rights; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.07393147902492228,"score_gpt":0.3335000328272876,"score_spread":0.2595685538023653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1562861504","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2272311,0.01570792,0.017950455,0.56473213,0.0017873043,0.0003858492,0.000032530097,0.00008477769,0.172088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94273406,0.0027069089,0.0031758533,0.04182128,0.0004112916,0.00011196971,0.000005975611,0.000027663536,0.009005049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9724665,0.016564738,0.0012450038,0.0015182866,0.0035098614,0.004695603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9305629,0.052495636,0.00525357,0.0023550221,0.004227592,0.005105155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028597975,0.00026256754,0.0006300149,0.0019625793,0.027233534,0.019329641,0.0027055882,0.013397771,0.009181479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054686204,0.0008273192,0.0004928539,0.0013508198,0.026986726,0.013650299,0.020522276,0.020994872,0.00048380665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038501432,0.0001244585,0.004119831,0.0002793331,0.00001687258,0.0051514693,0.09668918,0.00038687914,0.0019623535,0.8463167,0.011314831,0.033599533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013372593,0.00033427196,0.008889737,0.00353122,0.00007602981,0.004871871,0.20102526,0.0017356501,0.0045968755,0.3336531,0.44092673,0.0002255775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023462206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047937773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028597975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011399736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031646717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15124238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564650852","doi":"","title":"Feminist Activism in the Supreme Court: Legal Mobilization and the Women's Legal Education and Action Fund","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Review of Canadian Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Politics; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.03457825904700046,"score_gpt":0.35763258022025857,"score_spread":0.3230543211732581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564650852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008551778,0.22043918,0.00086630305,0.36251143,0.002338976,0.000040919324,0.00008164131,0.000046505927,0.40512323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44571435,0.12731862,0.0013876228,0.042703383,0.003379355,0.000121191086,0.0001083145,0.00011816691,0.37914905],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805826,0.0004750909,0.000019324669,0.00010959433,0.00073151675,0.00060633215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990006,0.00052271294,0.00008294596,0.00002955147,0.00014556067,0.00021877099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001790489,0.00038091277,0.00024063142,0.0012512113,0.0094944,0.008334111,0.001032928,0.0038885544,0.009591353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028899673,0.00033419766,0.00016993478,0.0022451049,0.012050781,0.003912641,0.0026633358,0.0032825244,0.00091647124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014274016,0.000022938519,0.0005755999,0.00008836257,0.000003514537,0.00021497931,0.021398682,0.00011007498,0.00014313433,0.38143235,0.5271402,0.06885589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005284412,0.0000048303023,0.0016172901,0.00030333272,0.0000020724194,0.000056493318,0.010968375,0.0000579897,0.000080797014,0.02233198,0.96456385,0.000007668081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4025093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7079631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4025093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031504165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023542449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8003329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568858494","doi":"10.20361/g2qp5z","title":"The Swazi People by R. Van der Wiel","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Deakin Review of Children s Literature","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Xhosa; Zulu; Tswana; Glossary; Indigenous; Dance; White (mutation); Publishing; History; Languages of Africa; Sociology; Anthropology; Media studies; Visual arts; Art; Linguistics; Literature","score_opus":0.004114645198647812,"score_gpt":0.27517910635752135,"score_spread":0.27106446115887356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568858494","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016041794,0.4467654,0.0008587671,0.060281556,0.050292697,0.00009819013,0.00088814524,0.000524933,0.43868607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0061768484,0.09841776,0.0009414648,0.0076649836,0.002177921,0.000072908886,0.00047139463,0.00031604373,0.88376063],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99970454,0.00005116997,0.000018083474,0.00006782625,0.00011139582,0.000046864807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997209,0.00005589749,0.00002055252,0.000017467368,0.00012719899,0.000058066686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050866196,0.0012279142,0.00054769794,0.0010639997,0.0016630833,0.003174259,0.00071333535,0.0013788247,0.086575486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011718431,0.00058963324,0.00031252523,0.0013723628,0.0005966682,0.0033391248,0.0017336477,0.0025359916,0.06743799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046325276,0.0000066855514,0.000071056485,0.00013179933,0.0000017048554,0.000048490012,0.00037769985,0.0000175375,0.00006318936,0.0026181736,0.95077664,0.045882482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.8453014e-7,0.00000168145,0.00009728981,0.00010099372,6.5958716e-7,0.00005614857,0.0001286422,0.0000042269953,0.000015598082,0.00013467851,0.99945813,0.0000013087406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015251701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028875554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086575486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012072163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001593721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28962386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1569953442","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1445006","title":"Book Review: Martin Chanock, The Making of South African Legal Culture, 1902-1936: Fear, Favour and Prejudice","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Prejudice (legal term); Legal culture; Criminology; Political science; Law; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.009476285357499458,"score_gpt":0.2897929634056076,"score_spread":0.28031667804810817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1569953442","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018428179,0.6348332,0.00018172192,0.22232755,0.12482621,0.00007935936,0.0005010223,0.000053278996,0.017013356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0037183408,0.52254206,0.0003734149,0.16696884,0.108001165,0.0002314364,0.00056236336,0.00010458162,0.19749786],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929523,0.00013002586,0.000058094793,0.00011199945,0.00034214533,0.00006241208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955973,0.0022912647,0.00022007775,0.000063519445,0.0015133739,0.0003145219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012628644,0.0011775078,0.001968031,0.0041052145,0.00199627,0.002897526,0.0022601096,0.0061878473,0.02685631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00850264,0.0006885667,0.0005690025,0.0064445874,0.0017757278,0.003590169,0.0014882591,0.006111666,0.013792154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037283664,0.0000024614626,0.000020821095,0.00020710444,0.0000029520736,0.000015663858,0.00003731968,0.00001135192,0.000008729389,0.0003182084,0.99310315,0.006268579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001337031,0.000007240605,0.00040587812,0.0008518267,0.000011177824,0.000099200784,0.00014670214,0.000020479323,0.000023464907,0.0005009956,0.9979081,0.000011563946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04979024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.145016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04979024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004695766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00457823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09900087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1570629652","doi":"","title":"Protecting the Dignity and Autonomy of Women: Rethinking the Place of Constructive Consent in the Tort of Sexual Battery","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Autonomy; Tort; Constructive; Law; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Gender studies; Computer science; Liability","score_opus":0.033870480268388764,"score_gpt":0.29080364811252873,"score_spread":0.25693316784414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1570629652","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07174472,0.01629887,0.031201597,0.41761833,0.0017787394,0.00019057207,0.00007048021,0.00009811241,0.46099854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9293733,0.0050494387,0.005788007,0.043355316,0.0005762879,0.0001901081,0.000019083405,0.0000919429,0.015556496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9514804,0.034693327,0.001493925,0.0019951852,0.0065303105,0.0038068176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92169166,0.06740165,0.0019288645,0.005172852,0.0026870733,0.0011178838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061875764,0.0006273782,0.0009593839,0.001420307,0.01311268,0.014523714,0.004438438,0.027309468,0.0042392295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0850477,0.00081333285,0.00075376214,0.00116494,0.12605564,0.019509796,0.013176693,0.023267247,0.00074755086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004213337,0.000014880611,0.00027129837,0.00007582213,0.0000073341635,0.00028029658,0.038563833,0.00013546062,0.00024420963,0.9426298,0.005360968,0.012374072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086231594,0.00010768664,0.001356781,0.0019552996,0.000082936735,0.000716936,0.032294337,0.00059470214,0.0015090181,0.8171606,0.14402412,0.000111335685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029169595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043693244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061875764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010489606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024074342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3272342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572964298","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v30i2.12437","title":"JUDICIAL DISCRETION IN THE DETERMINATION OF POST-DIVORCE CHILD SUPPORT: A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MAINTENANCE ACT 99 OF 1998 AS COMPARED TO THE CANADIAN FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT GUIDELINES OF 1997","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Discretion; Interpretation (philosophy); Obligation; Child support; Government (linguistics); Welfare; Duty; Judicial interpretation; Political science; Law; Family law","score_opus":0.027946106230464327,"score_gpt":0.32231501797889267,"score_spread":0.29436891174842833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572964298","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025205621,0.71516186,0.0069582565,0.053072803,0.0019316319,0.0002547257,0.00016071125,0.000026991964,0.19722737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27229398,0.6615002,0.008068707,0.020235933,0.0031861812,0.00036353615,0.00022116047,0.000057189623,0.034073103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99112284,0.0029951043,0.00070412375,0.0006491928,0.0029435207,0.0015851432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99462765,0.003963808,0.0003611078,0.00011680812,0.0008177195,0.00011279982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008131975,0.00047413647,0.0008247996,0.005848627,0.0050675464,0.009667952,0.002237146,0.0063798395,0.0023982476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010866757,0.000786699,0.00096561655,0.0066574807,0.00877187,0.0043546143,0.002902073,0.006714175,0.00047375495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034695277,0.000054156957,0.0017843698,0.0013228455,0.000022954255,0.0010478424,0.011448345,0.000733283,0.0008329543,0.87528664,0.012498581,0.09493335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020442685,0.00014152897,0.015509224,0.006653575,0.000041367173,0.0010389785,0.007119867,0.0007841143,0.0010233443,0.05722412,0.91034067,0.00010290395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16755468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20276204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8324453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02232102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021563817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3331588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1574901069","doi":"","title":"Metropolitanisation : a tale of three cities in Canada and South Africa","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Africanus Journal of Development Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Metropolitan area; Sustainability; Equity (law); Decentralization; Business; Corporate governance; Economic growth; Local government; Government (linguistics); Economic policy; Development economics; Economics; Finance; Geography; Political science; Public administration; Market economy","score_opus":0.06164617737434093,"score_gpt":0.2828342618494007,"score_spread":0.22118808447505978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1574901069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79522896,0.011778707,0.0006152426,0.05738161,0.0005107564,0.0003468863,0.0012057507,0.00008186431,0.13285017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9603544,0.0063682664,0.000853159,0.0027745592,0.00004707376,0.00007578769,0.0003941874,0.000060756574,0.029072024],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830616,0.00014657532,0.00002662455,0.0000989339,0.0003109137,0.0011106817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983473,0.000109431574,0.00007941123,0.000040004532,0.00053627946,0.00088764646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068145484,0.00068518607,0.00047000693,0.0030889988,0.04519213,0.0064702085,0.0016599535,0.0016275065,0.0045352443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017901243,0.0004387115,0.00053112174,0.007520508,0.008704618,0.0020004942,0.0070437705,0.003353525,0.00025576],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033522767,0.0003039081,0.12525122,0.00079866836,0.00017238376,0.0146806855,0.5178191,0.0016449923,0.003116278,0.09810385,0.09650084,0.14127286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002062135,0.000043393316,0.14500274,0.00036175255,0.000065777334,0.0008564631,0.5924166,0.00033450915,0.00042743003,0.0030848805,0.25726244,0.0001232904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99366623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10583985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10583985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0992916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76792544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576654223","doi":"","title":"A legal comparison between South African, Canadian and Australian workmen's compensation law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Law; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03741250059426563,"score_gpt":0.3288176060820602,"score_spread":0.2914051054877945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576654223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84268945,0.004249327,0.00017300312,0.014404841,0.00012345017,0.00009731946,0.00018509565,0.0000043857763,0.13807306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98923117,0.0017282967,0.00017223954,0.0014117878,0.00002300723,0.000030652893,0.00004670569,0.0000047509175,0.0073514073],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996071,0.0007562398,0.0001556058,0.00016218788,0.0010417366,0.0018133379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99151844,0.004191022,0.00083315116,0.00015517729,0.0023184577,0.000983676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003469635,0.00016793786,0.00025528594,0.005743035,0.0149857355,0.0061605987,0.001013587,0.0016428408,0.008502487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02013429,0.00023036786,0.00029415762,0.008640162,0.005462411,0.0022213568,0.0023858822,0.0023547781,0.0002758779],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003594215,0.00026549184,0.11250051,0.0005680405,0.00006330876,0.0032273815,0.43410516,0.00044512254,0.0011362787,0.36670202,0.018471839,0.062155433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038262122,0.000094072086,0.3491822,0.0013401738,0.00008566831,0.00066884124,0.5462856,0.00035374312,0.00046856556,0.007908455,0.09350424,0.00007016185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82734215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.918965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17265785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032483287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043681193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3473493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1578391147","doi":"","title":"Defining the limits of the common-law, South African and European privilege against self-incrimination","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review = Stellenbosch Regstydskrif","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Privilege (computing); Common law; Political science; Statutory law","score_opus":0.023421961660647788,"score_gpt":0.2904408270188929,"score_spread":0.2670188653582451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1578391147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054829545,0.24914269,0.003931652,0.051182967,0.0007918581,0.000084231055,0.00010219395,0.000013819954,0.6399211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86725867,0.08267284,0.0024179441,0.013693734,0.00086568884,0.00024960484,0.000053404572,0.000024792125,0.03276343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914903,0.0047424957,0.00048715476,0.00070194795,0.0014580961,0.0011200067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939038,0.0046078083,0.00046607654,0.00031635966,0.00055361213,0.00015218135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008773588,0.0003003846,0.00055142335,0.0030134935,0.0047780145,0.010084092,0.000992216,0.005638034,0.0019063244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0109322425,0.00038699125,0.0002903814,0.0023288091,0.026764547,0.006744571,0.004930454,0.004571075,0.00035432217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063926336,0.0000055332707,0.00027967995,0.000092182665,0.0000035905039,0.00008994057,0.0023751913,0.00009794423,0.00014044481,0.988941,0.0012223691,0.0067457175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019445273,0.000055731758,0.007997693,0.0034324243,0.000036888752,0.00042695523,0.008395093,0.00029878507,0.000847302,0.48261386,0.49582857,0.00004722276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044039194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05906279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044039194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008132963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013269878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08756572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W157918589","doi":"","title":"Pacta commissoria (vervalbedinge) en pandreg : aantekeninge","year":2010,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Journal of South African Law / Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Philosophy; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.01661888708315236,"score_gpt":0.2902815755631063,"score_spread":0.27366268847995395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W157918589","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023177044,0.023090694,0.0020149234,0.045963243,0.0023549988,0.00008752945,0.00040662277,0.00017323677,0.90273166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36456951,0.014699495,0.0020029491,0.06245318,0.0013835852,0.00024975088,0.0004276254,0.00022682453,0.553987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967422,0.0006367033,0.00016437196,0.00063614215,0.0009994624,0.00082115945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980843,0.00083563215,0.00019146582,0.0002492638,0.0004772117,0.00016219117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020700947,0.0004940644,0.00035170355,0.0006785283,0.006977183,0.0075723235,0.0013875577,0.00826064,0.027069278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044979313,0.00057312835,0.0005862039,0.000985302,0.005354045,0.0061968826,0.004342611,0.007674952,0.0039208173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005514494,0.00006623675,0.0024192173,0.00022686576,0.000021492096,0.00091895886,0.008609499,0.00009820932,0.00056919554,0.71064526,0.22468154,0.05168831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006683444,0.000028055982,0.002798213,0.0002762793,0.000021444985,0.00031663678,0.0023579071,0.000043287513,0.0003832822,0.009570585,0.9841748,0.000022643851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10315306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16631451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10315306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004171274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00803822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20510525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580896534","doi":"","title":"Specialised intellectual property courts : where does South Africa stand on the global map? : intellectual property law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Without Prejudice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Law; Political science; Property law; Property rights","score_opus":0.03046327200662017,"score_gpt":0.2739175606346154,"score_spread":0.24345428862799526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1580896534","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08553215,0.06256563,0.0011665168,0.67389864,0.0009911576,0.000036083606,0.0001371678,0.00002579753,0.17564687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8774454,0.040005207,0.0014024109,0.058369033,0.0007736164,0.00004501186,0.000072199255,0.0000398088,0.02184735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990671,0.00026310363,0.000049873353,0.00009365034,0.00015513894,0.00037100233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997471,0.0013129645,0.00042162384,0.00010907462,0.00035467572,0.00033065624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001991606,0.0002735959,0.0002192208,0.0012575927,0.004503298,0.008337493,0.00051171036,0.004464002,0.0068938807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004808139,0.00019189292,0.0002524073,0.0024748857,0.009374125,0.009204898,0.0028741646,0.005202851,0.00046744454],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028521348,0.000020719446,0.003253518,0.00040482904,0.000012687086,0.0020455145,0.01979589,0.00012479015,0.0007778942,0.889725,0.04033448,0.04347614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036615158,0.000040670493,0.020748183,0.0033969658,0.000043495715,0.0022605723,0.074004605,0.0003123836,0.0012713069,0.23810998,0.6597081,0.000067189176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0310638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048764564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0310638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005575821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011609618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06176597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581458977","doi":"10.4102/jtscm.v3i1.54","title":"Driver pretesting system in Zimbabwe: An analysis of impacts and perceptions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Transport Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Stakeholder; Perception; Business; Government (linguistics); Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.01027439998144532,"score_gpt":0.28005948639717876,"score_spread":0.26978508641573345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581458977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990988,0.00006302829,0.00004582533,0.00023531148,0.0000017908947,0.000023213028,0.000021433763,0.0000013250163,0.000509334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99944955,0.00016534347,0.00006443908,0.000050781135,0.0000015706879,0.00001560418,0.000018342294,0.0000010601071,0.00023331647],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971572,0.001138478,0.00017519353,0.00013111082,0.00070093386,0.0006969725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99518776,0.0018005566,0.0015219416,0.0001838383,0.0007628683,0.0005430523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028461856,0.00022353826,0.00019608054,0.0010143153,0.0018383267,0.0013612009,0.0003371109,0.0004236127,0.0017002352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012129674,0.0003090721,0.00021631665,0.0011780518,0.0016820007,0.0010124901,0.0014232559,0.0007450496,0.00016357136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001650633,0.0004057934,0.7742474,0.00018455245,0.000034840265,0.0011687636,0.17626116,0.00011387635,0.0040074936,0.0006851687,0.00063786225,0.04208806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000106645775,0.0003610119,0.8786892,0.00009745365,0.000021402784,0.00026611454,0.11561545,0.00026127647,0.00058113236,0.000082899176,0.003991452,0.000021935135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052807614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053048782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052807614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030984064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022120052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.105000496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586503322","doi":"","title":"Equality and unfair discrimination : refining the Harksen test","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Supreme court; Charter; Law; Relation (database); Context (archaeology); Test (biology); Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.07026810988229498,"score_gpt":0.3092973164572257,"score_spread":0.2390292065749307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586503322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07264428,0.0044252984,0.084717296,0.09075046,0.0029714045,0.00025357626,0.00020849645,0.000084357394,0.7439448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9584221,0.0007948647,0.010926399,0.015554083,0.0007267752,0.0001750608,0.000039191982,0.00005080528,0.01331063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9668832,0.013302715,0.0013393388,0.0040042433,0.010693182,0.0037773391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9548745,0.032989357,0.002096135,0.0033047916,0.0054369005,0.0012983449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03245518,0.0006561752,0.0017160452,0.003635422,0.00874519,0.00960131,0.0038508102,0.010916379,0.008365765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07548736,0.000429487,0.001263291,0.0022528835,0.0739979,0.020640628,0.0112278415,0.013549079,0.00086893555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009662823,0.000004513709,0.00016265664,0.000007727089,0.000002584309,0.000041973028,0.00033497374,0.0001160638,0.000017100727,0.9968886,0.00056656834,0.001847672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016084317,0.00002106905,0.00036237686,0.000080754064,0.0000066129874,0.000058684313,0.00061902916,0.00075323164,0.00015778161,0.9862279,0.011669478,0.00002712654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01711546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012172653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03245518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008655529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011375005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17164141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588949821","doi":"","title":"The effect of value-added tax on small to medium-sized developers of residential properties in South Africa","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Unisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Value-added tax; Business; Goods and services; Ad valorem tax; Tax credit; Tax reform; Property tax; Legislation; Accounts payable; Indirect tax; Public economics; Economics; Finance; Market economy","score_opus":0.018097334468779386,"score_gpt":0.2322368743754888,"score_spread":0.2141395399067094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588949821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9446625,0.00058276794,0.00013369371,0.0015195817,0.00007226197,0.00006538101,0.00058511,0.000016035283,0.052362584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799803,0.00089531613,0.000074308635,0.0001738275,0.000013805082,0.000022365864,0.00018415398,0.0000078026915,0.018648231],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990619,0.00019274543,0.000031719046,0.000067473,0.00022686803,0.0004192994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974637,0.00085800415,0.00056836335,0.00010088892,0.0006409537,0.00036810982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000613816,0.00022403049,0.00031729817,0.0011584957,0.0016304696,0.0020437604,0.00047470196,0.00039816563,0.015825855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055096867,0.00016601931,0.00044513974,0.0014781212,0.00081820885,0.0007264238,0.0012227753,0.0009594392,0.00066681445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003983513,0.001655568,0.6699517,0.0009733293,0.0004839781,0.011584731,0.016364776,0.021539474,0.012094493,0.08141523,0.038862728,0.14109045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028747992,0.00065197324,0.838841,0.00041659945,0.00030774367,0.0008881713,0.039996933,0.0045196973,0.009488073,0.0037404075,0.10078155,0.00008045794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23313159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33273882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23313159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00695583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045188596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4635492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592054344","doi":"","title":"An analytical study of the regulation of South African diamond trade from 1994 to 2009 with reference to aspects of the 1996 Constitution.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"ResearchSpace (University of KwaZulu-Natal)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts; European Commission; U.S. Department of the Treasury; African Union; Royal Bank of Canada; International Fund for Animal Welfare","keywords":"Constitution; Diamond; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.03519623775333819,"score_gpt":0.31525177118235626,"score_spread":0.28005553342901807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1592054344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8068607,0.010223732,0.0013447291,0.010355386,0.00008449143,0.00014888648,0.00057623786,0.000008647417,0.17039716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98376864,0.002558025,0.0003708639,0.00055456086,0.000018214727,0.00007346405,0.00014403589,0.0000080964155,0.012504058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999258,0.00019237313,0.000027187247,0.00008453153,0.00011425711,0.00032373946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99785787,0.0012186365,0.00049639825,0.00006904843,0.00025807455,0.000099867546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017728648,0.00017709604,0.0002067591,0.0028461951,0.0048899655,0.0027680236,0.00068581087,0.0015280319,0.004753706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006185329,0.00024017389,0.00021343122,0.005843101,0.0039346465,0.002877998,0.0015209154,0.0020252233,0.00019136287],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025813244,0.00013099567,0.0337301,0.00044016467,0.000038775204,0.0023279116,0.13999996,0.001621268,0.0023758411,0.7630011,0.011093354,0.044982404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029580353,0.00009624831,0.356657,0.0016141995,0.000062021674,0.0005316072,0.15303737,0.0011355818,0.0033350512,0.044489205,0.43895826,0.00005392166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12408208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20121448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12408208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015266669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008916907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24671972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595545527","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v31i1.2922","title":"An international perspective of restorative justice practices and research outcomes","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1251056966468923,"score_gpt":0.5630817214649989,"score_spread":0.4379760248181066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595545527","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07272978,0.12762173,0.018775884,0.23525588,0.004595771,0.00047575438,0.001328699,0.00016413699,0.53905237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8293077,0.104827784,0.019267228,0.017910011,0.002862888,0.0022051823,0.0009029963,0.00028795577,0.022428267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95289195,0.034744512,0.0031581572,0.0029599553,0.0038831718,0.0023622871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9384656,0.03616556,0.009238093,0.0033768392,0.009021959,0.0037319541],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.058376685,0.00085724046,0.0008833921,0.010091963,0.004376536,0.017473508,0.0016099112,0.0026720348,0.008274622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050275143,0.00031720652,0.00072658097,0.017629815,0.022311116,0.015452573,0.009101218,0.005541381,0.0012172497],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008298968,0.00025991828,0.012113219,0.0021247717,0.00006945331,0.00031984373,0.08449933,0.00037661256,0.0004175899,0.78664833,0.01735374,0.095734075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041516298,0.0005853718,0.03907879,0.012924491,0.00011019588,0.0009701992,0.32375532,0.0003553576,0.0008182736,0.20995162,0.41128182,0.00012696223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041372674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029309415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058376685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008028405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010573806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3087291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W160769704","doi":"","title":"Self-incrimination, private records, and required reporting in regulatory statutes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Privilege (computing); Law; Statutory law; Context (archaeology); Self-incrimination; Waiver; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.02234647486807,"score_gpt":0.2916551616949299,"score_spread":0.2693086868268599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W160769704","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108250745,0.012366704,0.06419777,0.05241969,0.0011349401,0.0005617067,0.0005509153,0.00026809386,0.7602495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9317155,0.0034186933,0.015527857,0.01406926,0.0013683415,0.0005771535,0.00020424885,0.000076885764,0.03304205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9548053,0.020273322,0.004181766,0.0038738323,0.012357464,0.0045082797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9169853,0.06054772,0.0069317617,0.007877092,0.006410226,0.0012479407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034611937,0.00049368665,0.00053449435,0.004109219,0.007938077,0.013636118,0.0028264632,0.012822946,0.004104396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06481078,0.001052938,0.0010181934,0.0037893169,0.03583939,0.009543151,0.005029053,0.008655958,0.00087783753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060685,0.0000121621015,0.00038194115,0.000018093986,0.0000015374742,0.00007160571,0.00090720586,0.00013557983,0.000050246268,0.99483746,0.0011472247,0.0024307359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008481426,0.00015155636,0.0040689385,0.0011049577,0.00005312351,0.0006917036,0.0022639008,0.003126794,0.0023157184,0.8291453,0.15684411,0.00014914908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04690095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030761926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04690095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010066704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017651986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18304765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1666412170","doi":"","title":"Problematic aspects of the right to bail under South African law : a comparison with Canadian law and proposals for reform","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law reform","score_opus":0.014470187945205822,"score_gpt":0.2877414275538324,"score_spread":0.2732712396086266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1666412170","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21261987,0.007948975,0.0029415106,0.20621583,0.0004041882,0.0002360223,0.00013830514,0.00001546682,0.5694798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9683982,0.0025404764,0.0012921693,0.010181268,0.00013136756,0.000095187446,0.000017122085,0.000023204877,0.017320918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97911716,0.0068775103,0.0005636772,0.0010968879,0.0045447424,0.00780011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813495,0.012599947,0.0010644023,0.0007501257,0.0032185614,0.0010173969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01782979,0.0005241363,0.0008791404,0.0052963453,0.03320831,0.020773355,0.0033565115,0.014604583,0.00858009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044980843,0.00087335316,0.000982306,0.008995128,0.047522493,0.008295877,0.0055413917,0.015440246,0.0002903053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017330249,0.000011807805,0.0005179038,0.00004408366,0.000005286975,0.00016699408,0.01657361,0.00012485278,0.000075773496,0.97776854,0.0019390811,0.0027547483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016280098,0.00007149856,0.020469766,0.002079812,0.00023699107,0.00054293446,0.13673142,0.0016580065,0.0011553157,0.61904126,0.21764907,0.00020115625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74322355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8301703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25677645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.085854866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1124324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62292355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W167291807","doi":"10.21991/c9s953","title":"UNDERSTANDING GROOTBOOM — A RESPONSE TO CASS R. SUNSTEIN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Enforcement; Political science; Law; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Human rights; Order (exchange); Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.17536705212009115,"score_gpt":0.32126896627456664,"score_spread":0.14590191415447548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W167291807","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010268496,0.005645226,0.00034003519,0.9834748,0.002410737,0.000005256843,0.000011674456,0.000006223349,0.0070792623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043106608,0.004454121,0.0006646166,0.93647045,0.005153412,0.000038111473,0.000015106426,0.000048418726,0.010049213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99322826,0.0028579608,0.00019040494,0.0012711736,0.0013340252,0.001118259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909595,0.0071828654,0.0002979115,0.00021571963,0.00069008494,0.0006538978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011557458,0.0006516144,0.0010729358,0.0011773054,0.01454345,0.009500312,0.0030431831,0.032787133,0.004632485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021660127,0.00055789924,0.00069577794,0.0018482264,0.035950992,0.02015496,0.0054276567,0.03884229,0.0007238032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028978391,0.000017267292,0.00017119237,0.0000605543,0.0000047957355,0.00028117507,0.0097162295,0.00013399422,0.00011201414,0.61468613,0.3688565,0.0059311334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024250816,0.000021015972,0.00038873215,0.00064296066,0.000005719098,0.00017657752,0.0089711305,0.00029597944,0.00019327183,0.29893634,0.69028974,0.000054202952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046371266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06817962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046371266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010337905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012383237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09220272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1703486188","doi":"","title":"Enforcement of fundamental rights and the standing rules under the Nigerian Constitution : a need for a more liberal provision","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Human Rights Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Anachronism; Enforcement; Common law; Interpretation (philosophy); Expansive; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.02036352092857403,"score_gpt":0.3175825170209664,"score_spread":0.2972189960923924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1703486188","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13224962,0.015063876,0.03217652,0.19273609,0.0018418896,0.00015468638,0.000093583614,0.00007401351,0.62560976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96245414,0.0038275635,0.010841024,0.009911577,0.0009762851,0.00017414615,0.000050909563,0.000032623408,0.011731868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903882,0.0041642273,0.0008162217,0.00078373833,0.0024820557,0.001365643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855526,0.007876308,0.001954892,0.0018971591,0.0020089159,0.0007101051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014698068,0.0003865735,0.00085894484,0.0013259592,0.005865016,0.0139797395,0.0013054296,0.007145593,0.002623963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019847315,0.0006592664,0.00041886856,0.0010625882,0.03892091,0.01466167,0.004896636,0.016742732,0.0003140949],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033121212,0.0000058225523,0.0001370515,0.000014532391,9.176655e-7,0.00003927426,0.0011447659,0.0001134063,0.00011175762,0.9952887,0.0003149956,0.002825469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025091822,0.00003396238,0.0017138001,0.00069917075,0.000009470949,0.00013467066,0.0031758358,0.0006154131,0.00035573269,0.9421113,0.051068068,0.0000575773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016445816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022740243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016445816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073265126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017418155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07773179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W171480398","doi":"","title":"Governance of cybersecurity in South Africa","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer security; Corporate governance; Business; Information governance; Public administration; Political science; Computer science; Information system; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.02765076795755129,"score_gpt":0.29964006329255255,"score_spread":0.27198929533500127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W171480398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77364165,0.004356507,0.0044579795,0.049462292,0.00010801555,0.00018483098,0.00010377713,0.000020855903,0.16766413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99572915,0.00078896113,0.00024471126,0.00030232998,0.000010868398,0.000024909157,0.00001057728,0.0000043841414,0.0028840634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998872,0.0004998123,0.00004803026,0.00007530523,0.00008825308,0.00041668268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984189,0.0006105438,0.00038782295,0.00008995487,0.00013966126,0.00035323369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019814793,0.00019688404,0.00016539599,0.0012174046,0.0036388298,0.006532778,0.0003608435,0.00094349834,0.0061432403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035658518,0.00027557267,0.00012247366,0.0017861971,0.005729565,0.002725116,0.0045415843,0.0012333132,0.00018084883],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006874436,0.00007108995,0.017972615,0.00024155522,0.00003390278,0.0015180969,0.05763522,0.0024896017,0.0023637065,0.8931258,0.004347644,0.020131921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001277343,0.0001302737,0.08631046,0.0015740615,0.00009218272,0.0009789017,0.16606209,0.0046456917,0.002097025,0.34962672,0.38826656,0.00008820321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02138641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027382776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02138641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067312866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010210399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04883915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1754125440","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1203","title":"Managing Charter Equality Rights: The Supreme Court of Canada’s Disposition of Leave to Appeal Applications in Section 15 Cases, 1989-2010","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Charter; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; High Court","score_opus":0.02555511051597266,"score_gpt":0.3141556700297845,"score_spread":0.28860055951381186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1754125440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8672946,0.005167843,0.00072321563,0.018073007,0.00019566304,0.00020017318,0.00059299066,0.00003827819,0.1077143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98629826,0.0012289307,0.0003058244,0.0024032677,0.000049388203,0.000025060635,0.00015340904,0.0000104063165,0.009525366],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.986201,0.0009899422,0.00036485083,0.00081486395,0.0053619775,0.0062674396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9767452,0.0082546,0.0036925464,0.00042575956,0.0075272643,0.0033546006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0091270385,0.0001947888,0.0004902677,0.004659031,0.017723827,0.009701754,0.0025407001,0.0036075157,0.0023606766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03715661,0.00056198955,0.0004500049,0.0062467656,0.0059875823,0.0016989504,0.0027859532,0.0049768193,0.0002282421],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040738663,0.0004143122,0.3613019,0.00036981222,0.0002447617,0.00601802,0.09784731,0.0038774805,0.0039834655,0.32979447,0.07962402,0.116117075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060267375,0.00012262062,0.8046645,0.0003897745,0.00015768061,0.00042388096,0.045292728,0.002107744,0.0020404737,0.008264178,0.1362177,0.0002584348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98174125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99562716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86886007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13113992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16639726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9514912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1772612133","doi":"","title":"Strafregtelike struikelblokke in die mishandelde persoon se stryd om geregtigheid : regte","year":2014,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Litnet Akademies : 'n Joernaal vir die Geesteswetenskappe, Natuurwetenskappe, Regte en Godsdienswetenskappe","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Die (integrated circuit); Art; Philosophy; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.018187339154420418,"score_gpt":0.29431164612818345,"score_spread":0.276124306973763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1772612133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07953469,0.009798047,0.009607698,0.027369933,0.0057732896,0.000110425215,0.0005331441,0.00027810287,0.8669947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50277734,0.0069630775,0.0043668696,0.0054383073,0.00056304137,0.000102688304,0.00054301857,0.0007484957,0.47849715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979069,0.0009681221,0.00006134478,0.00025031785,0.0004341432,0.00037923962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862945,0.00048096807,0.00008530071,0.0001625381,0.0002858384,0.0003558874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024618253,0.0006042329,0.00028549615,0.0006451809,0.006916318,0.010011023,0.00084408204,0.0013879449,0.04771422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034062916,0.00043623167,0.00034716638,0.0009954191,0.0068731066,0.008146857,0.0064510508,0.0041995947,0.008935721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014255196,0.00009252509,0.0031248687,0.00040943822,0.000014155056,0.0012412798,0.24542743,0.00018882562,0.0018133665,0.41152322,0.19939551,0.13662682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005361361,0.0000121516705,0.0010792862,0.00018578744,0.0000043451014,0.0002280894,0.04233129,0.000051086627,0.0004722923,0.007861726,0.947752,0.000016512362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024392905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06271199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04771422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004154588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057593533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15961993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1774255088","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1138","title":"Precedent, Principle and Pragmatism: Justice Wilson and the Expansion of Canadian Tort Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Political science; Delict; Appeal; Sociology; Public law; Private law; Black letter law; Liability","score_opus":0.03942703095278265,"score_gpt":0.3191824306053409,"score_spread":0.27975539965255825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1774255088","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.099734336,0.010566216,0.005315156,0.2809957,0.0006995557,0.00007814348,0.000101619575,0.00008103906,0.6024283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93318355,0.0025102186,0.0026514581,0.018759862,0.00015734852,0.000025981393,0.000018368917,0.000032400858,0.042660847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951113,0.0008861321,0.00010100919,0.00064538233,0.0017717659,0.0014844062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963439,0.0013351543,0.00022820024,0.00016381656,0.0011785144,0.00075051235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036900348,0.0003440972,0.00028204618,0.0020908616,0.03156778,0.009823644,0.0018835347,0.0047176504,0.0039655045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010109509,0.00041062536,0.0003253285,0.002048734,0.040491946,0.0044552186,0.004555476,0.0067496807,0.00021113234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008778268,0.000006964184,0.000674786,0.000020319814,0.000002634832,0.00018606622,0.009949686,0.00017754258,0.000116552146,0.9679281,0.012705379,0.008223163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004035694,0.00003045244,0.008023483,0.00037358378,0.000034132874,0.00034352715,0.028733883,0.0016433658,0.0004445491,0.4142044,0.5459284,0.00019990187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97214395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9858117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11217072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11217072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1256548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81385934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1783277956","doi":"10.25071/1920-7336.26031","title":"An Evaluation of South Africa's Application of the OAU Refugee Definition","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Refuge Canada s Journal on Refuge","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Appeal; Convention; Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); Political science; Law; Comprehensive Plan of Action; Public administration; Business","score_opus":0.05549133444766365,"score_gpt":0.3128300183247841,"score_spread":0.25733868387712044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1783277956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88868946,0.0016930832,0.001342268,0.007938248,0.00019247491,0.0005538147,0.00015060647,0.000013651854,0.09942627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992937,0.00088695774,0.0014336323,0.000891459,0.000036730784,0.00021636914,0.000070666734,0.000016226415,0.0035109008],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96078986,0.023590466,0.0019338378,0.0009434584,0.009148429,0.003594008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92316854,0.05180363,0.0058201514,0.0028248602,0.014699706,0.0016831245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050587602,0.0003390449,0.00045288063,0.004343244,0.0060239416,0.006101181,0.0011969478,0.0010953248,0.003899387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11588072,0.0003505731,0.00047715477,0.006120257,0.0052594375,0.0030738877,0.006749649,0.0019840656,0.00027979957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014223228,0.0003539707,0.13931924,0.0019364555,0.000114349044,0.0043829265,0.43604302,0.0027164423,0.0066320915,0.19643995,0.010195595,0.20044363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014534821,0.001108524,0.25952008,0.0020528291,0.0000858755,0.0009354831,0.45698267,0.0017707322,0.0038494675,0.0052694776,0.26812965,0.0001498148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.064958304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0887272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064958304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014518984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012286393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26753604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1801314064","doi":"","title":"Administrative Law in Public-Sector Employment Relationships","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Public sector; Legislation; Economic Justice; Administrative law; Supreme court; State (computer science); Subject (documents); Public law; Power (physics); Political science","score_opus":0.12795058424267347,"score_gpt":0.29050052465917486,"score_spread":0.1625499404165014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1801314064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08448732,0.012548591,0.0064240354,0.17983682,0.00085234595,0.000100947604,0.00007089185,0.00008446329,0.7155945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9516706,0.0022483703,0.00084873446,0.014120419,0.001123399,0.00012731283,0.00001703929,0.000027468814,0.029816784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876084,0.005003456,0.00065243273,0.0010198876,0.0022506,0.0034652988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97958905,0.015083458,0.0019240965,0.0010349121,0.0012513053,0.0011171716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012739891,0.00035612407,0.000508095,0.0018758613,0.021757703,0.02236842,0.0019316622,0.015107397,0.009295976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02453234,0.0006781039,0.00055233465,0.002979678,0.045722168,0.007127379,0.006602085,0.010989026,0.00080541294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003172163,0.000012210263,0.00020189838,0.000013718945,0.0000016260691,0.00015408313,0.0025969006,0.00009506775,0.000041333788,0.9932374,0.0023358066,0.0013067921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007257778,0.000059976835,0.0046772347,0.00065219763,0.00003119047,0.0004862715,0.015769806,0.0010177472,0.0006138342,0.57850605,0.39805076,0.000062335115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04431667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03480331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04431667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018866267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022866474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13688499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1810554196","doi":"","title":"Contested Concepts: Equality and Dignity in the Case-Law of the Canadian Supreme Court and South African Constitutional Court","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Supreme court; Law; CLARITY; Political science; Constitutional court; Economic Justice; Constitutional law; Proportionality (law); Sociology; Constitution","score_opus":0.10685737232591842,"score_gpt":0.3635527079116429,"score_spread":0.2566953355857245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1810554196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12424084,0.049649607,0.0036182252,0.16896738,0.00070338295,0.0001626011,0.00018413087,0.000022664914,0.6524512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9512364,0.008406339,0.0022951176,0.007010596,0.00014054956,0.000076048185,0.00004663074,0.00001932948,0.030769043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927371,0.0022199482,0.00016309609,0.0004119048,0.0025739202,0.0018939292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950788,0.0029364761,0.00021532946,0.00014239494,0.0010481142,0.0005788739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0088389795,0.00064423337,0.00075032434,0.0037635094,0.036119204,0.015126486,0.002793533,0.006574179,0.00454941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016082482,0.00056644256,0.00047577446,0.0055907597,0.053860094,0.007611792,0.004923384,0.0075581027,0.00019879398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005758626,0.0000053035774,0.00030172712,0.000021951208,0.0000033389579,0.00013958859,0.015279374,0.00010374364,0.000045702018,0.97728056,0.003917216,0.0028956234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033637676,0.000014616356,0.00802367,0.0011388334,0.00004794795,0.00028924906,0.06386461,0.0011757185,0.00039554067,0.67096764,0.2538807,0.00016782741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.953601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9810079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15106633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15106633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11423713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98464274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1814892625","doi":"10.4102/satnt.v24i1/2.167","title":"A decade of democracy: environmental management in a changing world","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suid-Afrikaanse Tydskrif vir Natuurwetenskap en Tegnologie","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earth Summit; Political science; Legislation; Charter; Government (linguistics); Constitution; Summit; Environmental law; Democracy; Public administration; Environmental protection; Economic growth; Environmental planning; Sustainable development; Politics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.017599888277501582,"score_gpt":0.3077595941773805,"score_spread":0.29015970589987894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1814892625","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009363426,0.04033515,0.0057290746,0.6742166,0.005555813,0.000054158183,0.000056631205,0.00012974291,0.2645594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68347853,0.050870955,0.005149192,0.14992294,0.008431396,0.00026285558,0.00014773062,0.00027442645,0.10146202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98251987,0.011027308,0.00032199515,0.0011377712,0.0025156953,0.0024774086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907442,0.0030641514,0.0008533611,0.00078437745,0.00088306406,0.003670962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012660931,0.00063903513,0.0008311103,0.0013392894,0.012507208,0.02413219,0.0014701455,0.008490368,0.012565776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01175676,0.0003767005,0.0004196217,0.0027489876,0.030187959,0.027468119,0.01475796,0.013256081,0.0021577638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002573299,0.00007825598,0.00047315305,0.0001599906,0.000012409815,0.00016966033,0.01767243,0.00026699362,0.00012880185,0.8060931,0.12066629,0.054253135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001355063,0.000035187768,0.00040805506,0.00038700015,0.0000023384075,0.00007325324,0.011681852,0.00015138453,0.000054193933,0.34144118,0.6457337,0.000018299519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027630855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041801394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02413219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008534177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016315091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06695825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1819105132","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1178","title":"Lovelace and Law Revisited: The Substantive Equality Promise of Kapp","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Dignity; Law; Supreme court; Section (typography); Test (biology); High Court; Legislature; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04251897755341901,"score_gpt":0.3545310692028195,"score_spread":0.3120120916494005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1819105132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03746773,0.015320834,0.022690138,0.43725008,0.0015248152,0.00014207306,0.00015267993,0.00006473846,0.4853869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82208,0.0043481262,0.0075415196,0.110490456,0.0011179673,0.0002185831,0.000033593355,0.00005357841,0.054116145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98183215,0.0076969177,0.00064475,0.002695376,0.004769306,0.0023615034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99048144,0.006685427,0.00043208138,0.00082937715,0.0012059847,0.00036576737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016174598,0.0003494386,0.0008258094,0.0015079337,0.011710843,0.011791976,0.0028807302,0.0151646165,0.003970472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025432318,0.000720961,0.0009816688,0.0014028316,0.05168448,0.010075019,0.007198363,0.02140869,0.0005774832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035918722,0.0000021054157,0.00005054256,0.000016505759,0.0000024152066,0.0000653206,0.001025526,0.00005127136,0.000032212185,0.9948783,0.0021015422,0.0017706087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039225848,0.000037107697,0.0007147306,0.0003025266,0.000020930509,0.00021092186,0.0023148034,0.00049578433,0.0005065783,0.8240811,0.17121479,0.00006149836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13476524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.152354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13476524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021252748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02714095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26796162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1820010189","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1246","title":"The Aboriginal Sentencing Provision of the Criminal Code as a Protected “Other Right” under Section 25 of the Charter","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Criminal code; Charter; Political science; Law; Criminal procedure; Code (set theory); Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.028645309101327156,"score_gpt":0.3431667786345331,"score_spread":0.3145214695332059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1820010189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.115674295,0.0021630854,0.01746085,0.029546373,0.002013529,0.00061578676,0.00046132217,0.00030951286,0.8317552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7751937,0.0010894269,0.013633645,0.02100659,0.0004868935,0.00044452937,0.00041407516,0.00007376772,0.18765734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9805735,0.0033658303,0.0009684923,0.0018300313,0.008314161,0.0049480163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864009,0.0038701866,0.0015330983,0.0014430998,0.0050098863,0.0017427712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071515627,0.00042359007,0.00042107145,0.0013342898,0.007676437,0.008732703,0.0023263432,0.0054299836,0.00323142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017501414,0.0004908293,0.00073769956,0.00068474375,0.009056774,0.0018509332,0.0037573355,0.0049322643,0.0008951203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003078839,0.000046644152,0.004103226,0.000084646395,0.000013829692,0.00078463944,0.016119458,0.0009342795,0.001149093,0.93331,0.02767434,0.0157492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004033773,0.0002414749,0.024847614,0.000654155,0.000106228756,0.00083637104,0.011144039,0.0014930244,0.0031164999,0.05046998,0.9067609,0.0002893565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5812762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6425624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41872382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013554324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.075953804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84237957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1824834794","doi":"","title":"Sentencing the corporate offender in South Africa : a comparative approach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Punishment (psychology); Commission; Sentencing guidelines; Political science; Criminal law; Law; Corporate crime; Criminal procedure; Criminology; Corporate law; Sentence; Business; Sociology; Psychology; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.1706108760139859,"score_gpt":0.3380569271859532,"score_spread":0.16744605117196731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1824834794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.757743,0.03202051,0.0015848745,0.0066160685,0.0003095002,0.00049977604,0.00019889009,0.0000074410686,0.20101999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9662932,0.026157828,0.0013312753,0.00069958327,0.00006247597,0.00019102391,0.00005644416,0.00000803717,0.0052001732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715567,0.0019721934,0.00008797264,0.00006813849,0.00020539422,0.0005105988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975674,0.0014952003,0.0003235911,0.00007180884,0.00041046902,0.00013156215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030333747,0.00050670886,0.0005647449,0.007111978,0.007318388,0.0040781535,0.0008700536,0.0023998066,0.0076176017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009391539,0.00040249713,0.0004336842,0.0068364954,0.0034269372,0.0040822984,0.0032886567,0.0019859795,0.00043351948],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00093146134,0.0008400006,0.02889649,0.0070938347,0.00024639547,0.024280334,0.29291683,0.0016780453,0.0045269323,0.4685389,0.007096264,0.16295455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000115883966,0.0014975027,0.09223757,0.008213506,0.0005486444,0.00977993,0.7247327,0.0012287082,0.0022863618,0.02457427,0.13468479,0.00010012293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034160875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09567657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034160875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010008202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055986443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07261491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1840587976","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1281","title":"Section 15(2), Ameliorative Programs and Proportionality Review","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Proportionality (law); Law; Supreme court; Scrutiny; Political science; Government (linguistics); Interpretation (philosophy); Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0437121907092876,"score_gpt":0.3492321278906274,"score_spread":0.3055199371813398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1840587976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014132246,0.033035316,0.054206073,0.16576836,0.0076682908,0.0013925777,0.00081507687,0.00042955094,0.72255254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4589419,0.015499022,0.037853796,0.32630166,0.0058004763,0.0031079245,0.00043869845,0.00017221802,0.15188439],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9620909,0.011309571,0.0036138082,0.0063975235,0.013073208,0.0035151013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9744265,0.013564692,0.0020544978,0.0025200036,0.006682623,0.0007516313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032509666,0.0004919176,0.00080668106,0.0023441368,0.0068127248,0.009816939,0.0027215807,0.014800467,0.004297082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056991667,0.00089799234,0.0012259106,0.0017118988,0.021256655,0.006436315,0.0040675425,0.01006459,0.0011426329],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000813195,0.000009528189,0.00028580258,0.00013242244,0.000011693937,0.000083801024,0.0010582076,0.0001850008,0.00014326967,0.96825635,0.021817973,0.0080076745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045606386,0.00007589088,0.0017872257,0.0008953356,0.00006137753,0.00026578704,0.0005334859,0.0004034443,0.0010243637,0.28363308,0.7111688,0.00010555946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12179138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10239897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12179138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012927188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052029263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24216491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1849597082","doi":"10.15173/glj.v6i3.2366","title":"The Treatment Action Campaign's Quest for Equality in HIV and Health: Learning from and Lessons for the Trade Union Movement","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Labour Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alliance; Social movement; Action (physics); Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Trade union; Political science; Collective action; Economic growth; Political economy; Sociology; Public relations; International trade; Medicine; Politics; Business; Law; Economics; Virology","score_opus":0.15183134565550963,"score_gpt":0.4305086984579208,"score_spread":0.2786773528024111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1849597082","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0111526335,0.014649603,0.00042768643,0.9307647,0.0013503757,0.000022067572,0.00001546028,0.000011640898,0.04160579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6693757,0.03859316,0.0023024913,0.22958721,0.0032991131,0.00019011971,0.00004261039,0.000083676176,0.05652592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99297416,0.004491775,0.00013129677,0.00023303456,0.0006568132,0.0015128871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98859495,0.007913213,0.00047409663,0.0002764129,0.00039852207,0.002342703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012498047,0.0005246146,0.0003905968,0.0011834792,0.019264385,0.013118104,0.0008909718,0.010823185,0.0100664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01386284,0.00032247647,0.0003994097,0.001287541,0.030996159,0.0138062285,0.008931554,0.016988875,0.00080050225],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000620422,0.00015110866,0.0013922396,0.00047480047,0.000016768872,0.0007601196,0.11104238,0.00022272933,0.0004585553,0.6229454,0.15973802,0.102735735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046542427,0.00008840989,0.0026451307,0.0016980837,0.000010189935,0.00024886397,0.1302156,0.00018048161,0.0004486125,0.13827185,0.726105,0.00004125818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022179533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03964579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022179533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009619991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027041866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06979829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1855246521","doi":"10.25071/1920-7336.36480","title":"Critical Challenges to Protecting Unaccompanied and Separated Foreign Children in the Western Cape: Lessons Learned at the University of Cape Town Refugee Rights Unit","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Refuge Canada s Journal on Refuge","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Child protection; Documentation; Government (linguistics); Unit (ring theory); Social protection; Political science; Work (physics); Public administration; Economic growth; Social work; Foreign policy; Law; Politics; Psychology; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.043149727762664285,"score_gpt":0.3155817251995841,"score_spread":0.2724319974369198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1855246521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4818016,0.016004378,0.0012559918,0.44818997,0.0015627536,0.00037774374,0.00007194832,0.000048809066,0.05068676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9500696,0.011733862,0.0027357512,0.012793315,0.00025005706,0.00017340184,0.000028353947,0.00004660331,0.02216903],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939721,0.0030495601,0.0002492469,0.00024823894,0.0005441579,0.0019366567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989913,0.0046775425,0.0005724018,0.00031201748,0.0007173829,0.0038075563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010149044,0.00051637,0.00045165923,0.0007961608,0.018790422,0.010169393,0.0031152822,0.0041587036,0.008063975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018195825,0.00065272383,0.00037424313,0.001068805,0.010343615,0.0054938863,0.008226666,0.009008753,0.00045760025],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010149862,0.0004399718,0.012633721,0.0013518407,0.00003619128,0.028046396,0.75579035,0.0009771865,0.0019304464,0.059756465,0.054916114,0.08401981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027022521,0.000115059636,0.011502794,0.002082133,0.00001785216,0.0019271253,0.8641231,0.0002500661,0.0008011981,0.004362892,0.11471742,0.00007342968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23604795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39106724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23604795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013344258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04432235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.469348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1860318624","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1051","title":"Is Money No Object: Can the Government Rely on Financial Considerations Under Charter Section 1","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"La Cité Collégiale","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Argument (complex analysis); Tort; Law; Compensation (psychology); Economics; Political science; Finance; Liability","score_opus":0.03660786601367969,"score_gpt":0.30662824855732257,"score_spread":0.27002038254364286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1860318624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024649596,0.0047919177,0.006742589,0.22213638,0.0028801318,0.00009304723,0.00013474842,0.00009417106,0.7384774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8043054,0.0031265826,0.0025387441,0.11712275,0.0034632117,0.00017679071,0.00011051658,0.0001316677,0.06902444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98645496,0.004542732,0.00050082145,0.0022522805,0.0032672659,0.0029819068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873883,0.006652484,0.0013650948,0.0012747085,0.0024384882,0.00088083954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01352027,0.0005319998,0.00080650504,0.0010564432,0.010188111,0.020353232,0.0021240513,0.02170531,0.01055364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036303718,0.00045806394,0.00063158857,0.0008816293,0.034766823,0.017951064,0.0062083662,0.011187268,0.002145829],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020551925,0.00000921079,0.00029074732,0.000020104962,0.0000040620016,0.000113877606,0.001496529,0.0000721178,0.000047448302,0.97878486,0.01608892,0.003051596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004922386,0.000044372693,0.0011997041,0.0005436252,0.00003435848,0.00017760746,0.0029797368,0.00036603116,0.00030557654,0.72270334,0.27151108,0.00008532718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035887204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024003154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035887204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009138927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012435626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071502864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1881710185","doi":"10.21991/c92378","title":"FROM MARGINALIZED DISCOURSES TO TENDER EMBRACES: BUILDING A NEW FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION JURISPRUDENCE IN SOUTH AFRICA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Freedom of expression; Expression (computer science); Law; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Human rights; Computer science","score_opus":0.05095967262843192,"score_gpt":0.31197599485480704,"score_spread":0.2610163222263751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1881710185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47447672,0.007017957,0.039209485,0.13992769,0.00054428,0.00046782513,0.000059447753,0.00008278855,0.33821377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99127805,0.00047239428,0.0032008623,0.0012801507,0.000032619493,0.00010552268,0.00000848572,0.000039677307,0.0035821372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98658204,0.008971799,0.0005012642,0.0008900814,0.0014340561,0.0016207817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98256,0.01321481,0.0007974153,0.001196746,0.0008696111,0.0013614511],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018924614,0.00047415547,0.00086493045,0.0020758733,0.022020431,0.018429,0.0020964404,0.0044394373,0.0045340066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023871768,0.000898312,0.0005557021,0.0014012046,0.07424931,0.019541966,0.023446804,0.011727765,0.00032780707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014654253,0.000024895438,0.00029867192,0.00009803124,0.0000041731173,0.0003055074,0.34089637,0.0001358806,0.0008097666,0.6500577,0.0006960362,0.006658424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005855224,0.00005584063,0.0018662504,0.0008973011,0.000030465626,0.00032952667,0.3209889,0.00071998616,0.0017043697,0.5054003,0.16787851,0.000070097645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010189693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012110661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022020431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0131475525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021542735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10008407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1882354232","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1278","title":"The (Re)Discovery of the Proportionality Principle in Sentencing in Ipeelee: Constitutionalization and the Emergence of Collective Responsibility","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Charter; Supreme court; State responsibility; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Human rights; Algorithm","score_opus":0.028789289579169576,"score_gpt":0.3352638882078174,"score_spread":0.3064745986286478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1882354232","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19072255,0.0071026855,0.1693793,0.12739533,0.0015721392,0.0004387347,0.00014386456,0.00016557619,0.50307983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96873647,0.00081300875,0.010578464,0.0075443387,0.0003896895,0.00023263787,0.000015145911,0.000037014797,0.01165324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98320836,0.0071519725,0.0011502034,0.002710985,0.0041555497,0.0016229675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983957,0.0111545995,0.0009538787,0.0014871984,0.0020495406,0.0003978934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02829444,0.00034905304,0.00056697807,0.0013162406,0.0046559847,0.007353201,0.0018940568,0.0068729697,0.0020287142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04072657,0.00063040084,0.000783724,0.0006919859,0.025279755,0.009752895,0.00739978,0.01812226,0.00023197268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050430276,0.0000046579926,0.00015489869,0.000020174459,0.0000038096296,0.00009126994,0.002659164,0.00014606862,0.00019193217,0.9919911,0.00053373555,0.0041981633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000567387,0.00013065984,0.0025227508,0.00044123735,0.000050470364,0.0005069659,0.0022312498,0.0018717917,0.003405132,0.87705994,0.11159698,0.00012609069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011352296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00958649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02829444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00485199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008520028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1496371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1888552146","doi":"","title":"Maman bat papa","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Politique africaine","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Metis; Legislation; Ethnology; Humanities; Sociology; Law; Art","score_opus":0.02900258408788902,"score_gpt":0.31467789939342933,"score_spread":0.2856753153055403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1888552146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3794149,0.011183698,0.0054574586,0.011867787,0.0008789514,0.0006308123,0.0013421173,0.00036904248,0.58885527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7078534,0.0091883475,0.00650339,0.0017826606,0.000114232294,0.00074090785,0.00063986756,0.000094169816,0.2730831],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998115,0.00004185507,0.000008899789,0.000034818604,0.000033353637,0.00006956005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997583,0.00007947812,0.00004702923,0.000024180445,0.00005509885,0.000035852307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031375073,0.00046214872,0.0003037178,0.0007310574,0.0034370648,0.001446748,0.0005287348,0.000554468,0.038825512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010455119,0.00032035995,0.0002079751,0.0010409714,0.00087841315,0.0010319808,0.0017795177,0.00084984914,0.0047568427],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039187112,0.00025818337,0.06787044,0.0032376547,0.00012885804,0.020430999,0.089849815,0.0009216251,0.026025437,0.18917741,0.03829658,0.5634113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003060651,0.00023256495,0.08268768,0.00094093784,0.00006878903,0.0078447545,0.040338628,0.0006910382,0.0039397515,0.011250001,0.8519276,0.000047693367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012749767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023230713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038825512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012854573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026660592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1298843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W189665483","doi":"","title":"Judicial discretion to exclude evidence in terms of s 35(5) of the Constitution : S v Hena 2006 (2) SACR 33 (SE) : comments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Law; Discretion; Political science; Section (typography); Judicial discretion; Economic Justice; Judicial review; Business","score_opus":0.07030531263123174,"score_gpt":0.3675662191141264,"score_spread":0.29726090648289466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W189665483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.083078176,0.004519439,0.016751556,0.40960118,0.008906547,0.0010565241,0.0011613228,0.0004919093,0.47443336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38200608,0.0014969457,0.007250693,0.5308623,0.0030256056,0.00067582686,0.00017056338,0.00015766502,0.07435436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98116803,0.003591339,0.0028329892,0.0030251525,0.0052762916,0.0041062534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97094584,0.02237657,0.0012153379,0.0012673723,0.0034526594,0.0007421517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02573239,0.00092454196,0.0014512077,0.001394492,0.011794822,0.010372302,0.0058309394,0.052619856,0.0055413023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055688884,0.0014985907,0.0021121928,0.0011643054,0.013095751,0.004800727,0.004505789,0.035292108,0.0023577588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015202632,0.00008393514,0.0022599995,0.00027819458,0.000096393116,0.003839576,0.014124183,0.00056966615,0.0045018233,0.77440846,0.19114402,0.008541782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002963656,0.00023511799,0.0047524613,0.0020626138,0.00029553016,0.0020820796,0.008110349,0.0016706845,0.007947991,0.16349863,0.8084858,0.0005623921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072295174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12805472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072295174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007720462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017802488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14374876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1899158120","doi":"","title":"R v Kapp : a model for South African affirmative action jurisprudence?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Judgement; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Remedial education; Order (exchange); Dual (grammatical number); Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.030670520803296717,"score_gpt":0.3434101125210649,"score_spread":0.31273959171776816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1899158120","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014773391,0.0029052403,0.067420356,0.18895635,0.000857662,0.00023182185,0.00013257221,0.00009183,0.7246307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87810063,0.0017505408,0.017909436,0.040524665,0.000663466,0.0007680385,0.000053612894,0.00008995689,0.060139704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99314415,0.0031896366,0.00014765674,0.00093280646,0.0012127168,0.0013731258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968105,0.0017227527,0.00028302855,0.00048559278,0.00039117804,0.00030696453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010455841,0.0007174474,0.000816607,0.001993775,0.008961207,0.0105453925,0.0029097465,0.012305341,0.009232057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010934027,0.0005591649,0.0011075711,0.001731515,0.03273569,0.016303763,0.0063004643,0.012805266,0.00187784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018305849,0.0000018370731,0.000012485855,0.0000041105714,5.0200947e-7,0.00001790839,0.0005201088,0.000034034496,0.00001216137,0.9985682,0.00047083755,0.00035613784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002132783,0.000010309315,0.00007420556,0.000073820454,0.0000032449605,0.00007327532,0.0010294039,0.00074723153,0.00007466791,0.95773613,0.040144682,0.0000116552665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023401609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016955774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023401609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009773173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011420228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07090974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1907220870","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v32i2.2940","title":"The role of public policy in the nonenforcement of foreign judgments arising from gambling debts in South African courts: A comparative overview","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comity; Enforcement; Debt; Political science; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Foreign policy; Jurisdiction; Public administration; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.1112529788754521,"score_gpt":0.4212934574958366,"score_spread":0.3100404786203845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1907220870","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4178128,0.17910312,0.0024899512,0.036385443,0.00028464771,0.0001428326,0.000108271124,0.000013506652,0.36365932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9393153,0.05592136,0.00036512912,0.0009860555,0.00012376797,0.000038378916,0.000018419989,0.0000062479357,0.0032253999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99653035,0.00172441,0.00016911568,0.00011578675,0.0004936615,0.0009665774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99066657,0.006794911,0.0012733681,0.00019507276,0.00082275685,0.0002473903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004987648,0.00021568213,0.00033945564,0.0064297686,0.004722778,0.00906915,0.0005292073,0.0018964137,0.003541354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011747015,0.00036445976,0.0002995538,0.0071822354,0.008944399,0.004885021,0.0028039091,0.0024865095,0.00021105786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008400794,0.00009087392,0.013285491,0.0017633018,0.00005212014,0.0017320171,0.05239255,0.00085074664,0.00045614532,0.86299694,0.0022758422,0.06401998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006291047,0.00041194094,0.16233294,0.014549934,0.00031455533,0.0040170443,0.230916,0.0022244104,0.0030586694,0.15895404,0.42302933,0.00012819654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018152103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028665883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018152103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00982202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010082826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07126415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1914365750","doi":"10.4102/jef.v5i2.299","title":"‘n Ondersoek na die inkomstebelastinghantering van beëindigingsboetes betaalbaar deur verhuurders by die voortydige beëindiging van ‘n huurooreenkoms","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lease; Economics; Context (archaeology); Profit (economics); Database transaction; Income tax; Business; Finance; Public economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.023011874141124676,"score_gpt":0.28262192197389374,"score_spread":0.2596100478327691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1914365750","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053253837,0.022126792,0.020193992,0.06654354,0.005122668,0.00016711578,0.000621756,0.00017603354,0.8317942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38809535,0.020738412,0.016224869,0.00614402,0.001126812,0.00018379162,0.00057880307,0.0007031508,0.56620485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99392456,0.0019789587,0.00036049416,0.00062768965,0.0023838924,0.00072426826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956956,0.0022372594,0.00070007035,0.00033788584,0.0006239147,0.00040534954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032992833,0.00055119896,0.0004923316,0.00078081415,0.0037422602,0.01060399,0.0012047946,0.0034990364,0.0819068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0135197425,0.0004957119,0.0004354593,0.0012278616,0.004138535,0.0066460534,0.0047720624,0.004172221,0.012098977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020390814,0.00020093148,0.0042507756,0.0008592881,0.000050530718,0.0018492634,0.021589914,0.0011131059,0.006680174,0.6220604,0.13396797,0.20717363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008366662,0.000022305312,0.0015439348,0.0004053655,0.000007926202,0.00030342702,0.0029954428,0.00029072544,0.001354212,0.013781436,0.97926027,0.000026533571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018084126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026146602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0819068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037995598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053410083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27400553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1930724199","doi":"","title":"Pillay and Others v S : trial fairness; the doctrine of discoverability; and the concept of 'detriment' - the impact of the Canadian s 24 (2) provision on South African s 35 (5) jurisprudence : comment","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discoverability; Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Law; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.0259280608459404,"score_gpt":0.3247955542952449,"score_spread":0.2988674934493045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1930724199","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018860813,0.0042932774,0.0026966783,0.8192384,0.004673839,0.00029001493,0.00049491413,0.00013830667,0.14931375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1363249,0.0012974484,0.0020184943,0.82091653,0.0044892104,0.0003966882,0.000051053346,0.0000890646,0.034416556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9782654,0.005458527,0.0016163752,0.0042925505,0.005919549,0.00444771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9293279,0.059199944,0.0022291532,0.0021813726,0.0050555933,0.0020060113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025019651,0.0011550407,0.0023274824,0.0021481642,0.021498093,0.0119189015,0.008802534,0.12636536,0.008335881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08609014,0.0019097842,0.0023762363,0.0030155915,0.03242583,0.008083645,0.004868778,0.05839124,0.001683873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009098374,0.000027474354,0.00043491516,0.00008987727,0.00003770324,0.00030193228,0.0054630213,0.00020887986,0.00021298279,0.8754012,0.115818895,0.0019122794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073932443,0.00015353967,0.004729121,0.0009189383,0.0002912389,0.0005201634,0.007452858,0.0014849233,0.002330327,0.46933407,0.51149726,0.00054822676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48648745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56865805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51351255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020539584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04142488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96731156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1931154280","doi":"","title":"'Tagging' bills in Parliament : section 75 or section 76?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Constitution; Jurisdiction; Law; Section (typography); Competence (human resources); Constitutional court; Government (linguistics); Political science; Computer science; Economics; Politics; Management","score_opus":0.020530151905430602,"score_gpt":0.24766032892015674,"score_spread":0.22713017701472615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1931154280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06784384,0.0014443861,0.028446805,0.07270751,0.0039820983,0.0004107492,0.0005246128,0.00034210764,0.8242979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7853844,0.0012997624,0.021224668,0.036561,0.0008159188,0.0004212409,0.0004755297,0.00028517377,0.15353218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98829204,0.0038802128,0.0009355965,0.0009082097,0.003541257,0.0024427436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99209213,0.0038535895,0.00090932014,0.0010474753,0.0017230834,0.00037444907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01069234,0.00036210698,0.00044326074,0.0013955017,0.007216313,0.007887845,0.0011349163,0.004436361,0.007976987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027201818,0.0005039959,0.00045473772,0.0024280874,0.009855206,0.007162127,0.0018302109,0.0037496611,0.0024882392],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034407036,0.00001419653,0.0015494718,0.000052860014,0.0000056886965,0.00016147652,0.008435358,0.00013157816,0.00084032083,0.92341304,0.043431193,0.02193046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032872304,0.00007668264,0.01704043,0.0007139682,0.000043025935,0.0003238661,0.014301524,0.00057782745,0.0034275933,0.11601662,0.84728,0.00016555823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08865135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11128854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08865135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010590406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016645273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17627072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1932747739","doi":"","title":"The First Years of the South African Constitutional Court","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional court; Constitution; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Dignity; Democracy; High Court; Human rights; Charter; Sociology","score_opus":0.05270734368583768,"score_gpt":0.30115180388678925,"score_spread":0.24844446020095157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1932747739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05636469,0.09777337,0.0072987266,0.18912554,0.00344837,0.00020930704,0.00015405189,0.000042541516,0.64558333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86981046,0.029029807,0.0023808815,0.017127717,0.0010610276,0.00022765668,0.00007268369,0.000057101188,0.08023254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890848,0.0050380956,0.00053760037,0.0007719593,0.0029417402,0.001625983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890856,0.007695663,0.0006909504,0.0005234283,0.0014218125,0.0005825173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012236905,0.0004289784,0.00046636214,0.0028967836,0.011069628,0.011583705,0.0008352156,0.005058474,0.0045108376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026540885,0.00088727847,0.0003948407,0.0025123705,0.018485537,0.009590547,0.0048419046,0.014290361,0.00052522],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070467404,0.0000056919494,0.00011043475,0.000034486842,0.000002162201,0.000120657765,0.003985896,0.00007848746,0.000079625745,0.9863762,0.003732005,0.005467368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000189657,0.00002719677,0.0016968058,0.00079067063,0.000007772271,0.00022975226,0.004543539,0.0002760478,0.00067581964,0.19220419,0.799488,0.000041118485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044746708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052508414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044746708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025253817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022655033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1832301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1933453569","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v36i2.3018","title":"Pecuniary interests and the rule against adjudicative bias: The automatic disqualification or objective reasonable approach?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Constitution; Theology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.09870584771046623,"score_gpt":0.3610285210144931,"score_spread":0.2623226733040269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1933453569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09185032,0.01125248,0.29899114,0.18790852,0.0019335648,0.00057205086,0.00023258281,0.00017430358,0.40708515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93430907,0.0012973252,0.039112777,0.017174955,0.00085093686,0.00031791214,0.00005037518,0.000049992832,0.006836623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93982065,0.024328295,0.004366163,0.005452076,0.021793334,0.0042394856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9572,0.027482843,0.0045539658,0.0047790846,0.0050717425,0.0009123009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04386534,0.0004739659,0.0010966454,0.0025338093,0.0044747777,0.010775846,0.0046847207,0.010101548,0.0029981565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08204658,0.0005637737,0.001216589,0.0015860143,0.03582482,0.014092318,0.005115452,0.012001751,0.0006144102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007087684,0.00000769148,0.00027878303,0.000029187653,0.000007882294,0.000035560774,0.0006637756,0.000096460506,0.000082879116,0.9937304,0.000538055,0.004522197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004764281,0.00004725051,0.00092684873,0.00034305724,0.000028375825,0.00015765121,0.00095140026,0.0010643037,0.0005380956,0.97481346,0.021029515,0.000052332227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009354524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018642278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04386534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006995089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012349127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23198485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1934157515","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v33i1.2951","title":"Gronde vir die weiering van toegang tot inligting soos van toepassing op openbare instellings (deel II)","year":2008,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.053831095083939316,"score_gpt":0.354117746080132,"score_spread":0.3002866509961927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1934157515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013686638,0.02012195,0.01832695,0.020415327,0.00636843,0.00023044707,0.0016849878,0.00032102544,0.9188443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20076877,0.017328667,0.0145850545,0.0052183643,0.0016204156,0.00046136233,0.0011834665,0.0011280171,0.75770587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956974,0.0010697334,0.00030856012,0.00055121875,0.0017265175,0.00064651726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873465,0.00062494766,0.00012734039,0.00016283093,0.00024815003,0.00010203479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021913094,0.0009930937,0.0006842812,0.0014231299,0.003982703,0.013039788,0.0012739246,0.0042590476,0.09508735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008029477,0.000729503,0.0005802518,0.0018323271,0.004331868,0.004856931,0.0051995153,0.0053853313,0.025015326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005351865,0.00004178528,0.00025863756,0.00037523513,0.000014836669,0.0004945516,0.008867842,0.00040249404,0.0014347633,0.7911356,0.13162792,0.06529278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069369603,0.0000068076674,0.00014990746,0.00021545743,0.000004001178,0.00011855433,0.0008105567,0.00007273773,0.00046592604,0.014301555,0.9838357,0.000011936941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01999831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0209766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09508735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040964107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005165381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3180989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1937304692","doi":"","title":"The Commission for Equality and Human Rights (part 1)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Research Online (The Open University)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Human rights; Political science; Law; Fundamental rights; Social equality; International human rights law; Gender equality; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.26729734920337345,"score_gpt":0.5040934428365701,"score_spread":0.23679609363319665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1937304692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018330112,0.017228603,0.009961572,0.075896695,0.009971381,0.0016558882,0.0032598865,0.0004892715,0.87970376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0874021,0.028185949,0.05229232,0.1300221,0.005746693,0.0054131183,0.004724338,0.001073014,0.68514043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9335115,0.013617178,0.006023467,0.0047809863,0.034214046,0.007852854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96178895,0.0101538645,0.00272994,0.0048321304,0.01734171,0.003153447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027537383,0.0012005806,0.0023278776,0.0043331883,0.005358483,0.013718899,0.0027245707,0.015404094,0.02440821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.065595865,0.0014068593,0.0012237111,0.0052780006,0.00722319,0.0063099195,0.006558198,0.018395098,0.02208385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031099513,0.000051219595,0.000513269,0.00032935163,0.000019541476,0.00013761745,0.0012199873,0.00020589876,0.00040186025,0.5352627,0.42233676,0.03949066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009386288,0.000010891816,0.0008084368,0.0005573505,0.0000111658355,0.00006957118,0.0001690108,0.000050503597,0.00013960604,0.014236836,0.98390424,0.000033019136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05705617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04453975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05705617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010329313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05722361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1456334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W193918409","doi":"","title":"The role of a modern central bank in managing consumer bankruptcies and corporate failures : a South African public-law angle of incidence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interest rate; Economics; Monetary policy; Financial system; Business; Finance; Monetary economics","score_opus":0.015143636976491657,"score_gpt":0.21829974192215612,"score_spread":0.20315610494566447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W193918409","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041862443,0.05048418,0.007835907,0.75721383,0.0030199736,0.00008141299,0.00005218811,0.00006664097,0.13938345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86914045,0.044776805,0.0033287366,0.04293271,0.0040860684,0.000080182355,0.000025000274,0.00007628831,0.03555374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99449134,0.002337477,0.00039130065,0.00051720004,0.0011233314,0.0011393403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98157746,0.008393742,0.0030773357,0.0011490426,0.0038420865,0.0019603593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018286077,0.00044880604,0.0003872874,0.002304314,0.007133769,0.018323513,0.0014441595,0.0077393632,0.010308149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02301583,0.000616824,0.00026461174,0.0022772895,0.019622192,0.017042825,0.0049339756,0.011321427,0.0011155843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000834521,0.00006577146,0.004610942,0.00031792023,0.000014921553,0.0011633193,0.019766496,0.00034133098,0.0004427416,0.85986125,0.04571683,0.06761492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075774085,0.00013510716,0.012018571,0.0032988954,0.000047444853,0.0030454914,0.031927083,0.0025721304,0.0011037788,0.20736422,0.73832035,0.0000912256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008903323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007622382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018323513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00686486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01294992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096707165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1940355904","doi":"10.25071/1920-7336.21368","title":"Insiders but Outsiders: The Struggle for the Inclusion of Asylum Seekers and Refugees in South Africa","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Refuge Canada s Journal on Refuge","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Safeguarding; Comprehensive Plan of Action; Political science; Legislation; Inclusion (mineral); Politics; Human rights; Law; Sociology; Gender studies; Medicine","score_opus":0.01967761990742772,"score_gpt":0.2965545827600229,"score_spread":0.27687696285259517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1940355904","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79903483,0.006480585,0.0007063814,0.13028798,0.00032114523,0.000060617098,0.000017074406,0.000011706565,0.06307968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98671514,0.0015865986,0.00012215064,0.005316906,0.00006491085,0.000031509135,0.0000049793534,0.00001445881,0.006143336],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913612,0.004425587,0.00020483865,0.0003975857,0.0006669182,0.0029439803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936441,0.0035641086,0.00072896935,0.00017284762,0.00023624564,0.0016538289],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008651565,0.00045946531,0.00066034775,0.0017193829,0.039314616,0.013454502,0.0014154224,0.005931452,0.006839877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009825684,0.000642009,0.0003709449,0.002016761,0.040172935,0.0078049507,0.022785876,0.008578281,0.00033553754],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025912905,0.00002664277,0.0024226487,0.00009102155,0.0000068886666,0.0023572154,0.8808545,0.000037034333,0.0005451864,0.104481116,0.0022519021,0.0068999957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011303348,0.000022591275,0.0026258514,0.00036368723,0.0000076011165,0.0007582286,0.93628794,0.000040629413,0.00019081862,0.007320297,0.052351497,0.000019578436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03592933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04968337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039314616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008764929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012197608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0714404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1941609635","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1000","title":"Don't Get Enough Credit: The Need for an Impartial Consumer Credit Report Appeal Tribunal in Ontario","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Ontario","keywords":"Appeal; Tribunal; Liability; Business; Credit history; Law; Law and economics; Accounting; Political science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.04621000422786614,"score_gpt":0.36957719301974,"score_spread":0.32336718879187387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1941609635","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09134877,0.007921185,0.0013956891,0.6832151,0.002060927,0.00030589828,0.00033477135,0.00011991105,0.21329778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5672601,0.008785786,0.003014333,0.15017757,0.0013018311,0.00025212357,0.00022213372,0.00017806925,0.26880813],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98863214,0.0009536549,0.0004887821,0.00066834147,0.0049626105,0.004294548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.970565,0.009177423,0.0019486527,0.00070778106,0.010405415,0.0071957107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006790029,0.00022730524,0.00045414772,0.001098371,0.041141573,0.012270651,0.0031398928,0.012247001,0.01072258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027779818,0.0009315273,0.00063743297,0.0023841998,0.012249135,0.004128887,0.0038340746,0.010066533,0.0005869164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011086166,0.00012093387,0.026549682,0.0005386017,0.000043508426,0.0038468367,0.05260418,0.00048130698,0.0015760602,0.32776487,0.5273154,0.05904776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005632393,0.000037020447,0.0358669,0.0004020103,0.000044964443,0.00027318115,0.023728259,0.00047679504,0.00041302264,0.0073480858,0.93123925,0.00011422953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9891733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99714726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13834116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13834116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31919506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1950670188","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9388.2010.00663.x","title":"Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation: The British Columbia Experience","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of European Community & International Environmental Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; Legislation; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.04874813427220085,"score_gpt":0.3173546946823896,"score_spread":0.2686065604101887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1950670188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5272229,0.0123696355,0.00040133312,0.110821165,0.00043372958,0.00015846844,0.00029972813,0.00005139008,0.3482416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.904824,0.008967633,0.0002203089,0.015588426,0.000040983858,0.00007263547,0.00011620417,0.00003698962,0.07013281],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99562955,0.00080860883,0.00010182723,0.00025162665,0.0013021753,0.0019062378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932319,0.0022116327,0.00033400406,0.0001756439,0.0018560657,0.0021908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030374525,0.00034883048,0.0004779543,0.0018776209,0.039669946,0.010350504,0.0023173124,0.0052440576,0.012189545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0084287,0.00057174003,0.00026184882,0.0048092343,0.009064314,0.002064123,0.0054314774,0.007316182,0.0008675754],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022824772,0.0007641435,0.048055727,0.0006568515,0.0001294997,0.014190152,0.3804857,0.0011256266,0.0022843785,0.1278739,0.25520238,0.16900344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053189528,0.00007747405,0.049685348,0.0007644518,0.00006119958,0.000801887,0.38100132,0.00038224214,0.0004852002,0.0044902684,0.5620593,0.0001381248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98630595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09161717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09161717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14329797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6647322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W195398862","doi":"","title":"HIV / AIDS and equal opportunities in the workplace : the implications of the Employment Equity Act","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Statutory law; Legislation; Equity (law); Affirmative action; Political science; Employment discrimination; Equal employment opportunity; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.16456644923569405,"score_gpt":0.3841107808934568,"score_spread":0.21954433165776274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W195398862","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045515444,0.04403462,0.0019574566,0.5485229,0.0026772437,0.00007232143,0.000035429344,0.000011305577,0.35717332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8162557,0.030244902,0.0017407812,0.10862314,0.0027158458,0.0001964642,0.000017666776,0.000021093345,0.040184435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98844135,0.0059702597,0.00035076583,0.00047960787,0.0017751325,0.0029828548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99284333,0.00540298,0.000531056,0.00020353195,0.00029766822,0.0007213907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00694037,0.00038688022,0.0004071153,0.0008636852,0.015153206,0.015406973,0.0014903956,0.015620088,0.00494715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009693277,0.00033150453,0.00057248684,0.0012884849,0.038349144,0.008046616,0.009392085,0.012066563,0.00046612302],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009130269,0.000030130246,0.00036931122,0.00005548035,0.0000018086924,0.00029092477,0.0077721947,0.00009933159,0.00006193698,0.98082274,0.0041668303,0.006320184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003606086,0.00013328371,0.0057804445,0.002658269,0.000021492342,0.0007154856,0.05309632,0.0005404821,0.00041202852,0.59041286,0.34610668,0.00008666653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019379685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025054146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019379685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007949952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017169047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057681203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964921481","doi":"","title":"The Protective Function and Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Duty; State (computer science); Constitution; Law; Constitutional law; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Government (linguistics); Fundamental rights; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.006188439553772255,"score_gpt":0.2321878651487161,"score_spread":0.22599942559494382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964921481","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021418875,0.0036571482,0.0073225214,0.030983977,0.00085078576,0.00023411697,0.00080718956,0.00009847236,0.934627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7942605,0.004111399,0.020968165,0.015462861,0.0004156635,0.00034125595,0.000624191,0.00008613396,0.16372988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931902,0.0009499812,0.00020845185,0.0007318384,0.0027110649,0.0022083102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99615026,0.0012022586,0.00021737012,0.0003237604,0.0016452324,0.00046115572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036463852,0.00045607216,0.0003599289,0.001652078,0.012824878,0.0069345753,0.0012075301,0.0037969314,0.005955889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008533383,0.00038025956,0.0005419832,0.0017823473,0.015772106,0.0019127385,0.0018766766,0.005250133,0.00045662594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042775378,0.0000019051678,0.0001358978,0.000009749599,8.772915e-7,0.000032952976,0.00072264276,0.00011141216,0.000054922286,0.9905161,0.006207719,0.0022016072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003302973,0.00002480427,0.005150897,0.00028881239,0.000024646708,0.0001958288,0.001821518,0.0008303963,0.00051205355,0.19077267,0.8002094,0.00013602973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9503726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9584711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049627423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048797697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13659267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35405374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967825996","doi":"10.4102/jtscm.v7i1.96","title":"Public transport policy and performance: The results of a South African public opinion poll","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Transport Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Public opinion; Government (linguistics); Public transport; Public administration; Political science; Public policy; Constitution; Democracy; Population; Politics; Economic growth; Business; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.027912949952342125,"score_gpt":0.26081505109635095,"score_spread":0.23290210114400883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967825996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99178255,0.0002984266,0.00008529168,0.0019574543,0.000026744498,0.00018509365,0.00079274934,0.000002900925,0.004868643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961563,0.00048403884,0.00011444983,0.0008307474,0.00005544031,0.00029321745,0.0003893696,0.0000062037375,0.0016702127],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947818,0.0027296348,0.0003256029,0.00021808034,0.00080579927,0.0011390308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863832,0.0070333024,0.0026092567,0.00032406225,0.0026155498,0.0010346294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0100974245,0.00035298098,0.0004541659,0.0038848491,0.0025526746,0.0020986302,0.00047065815,0.0017885988,0.0046425685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022701269,0.000357266,0.0005447465,0.0048232335,0.0011523218,0.0023159888,0.0021415479,0.0013573697,0.001218173],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001550446,0.0013573914,0.7451666,0.001133365,0.00014520538,0.0011464343,0.18948159,0.0002644804,0.001714352,0.0015513935,0.009466277,0.047022514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006350857,0.0005245236,0.852085,0.00026182635,0.00006283586,0.00011763605,0.13519725,0.00030048727,0.000305888,0.00020332684,0.010841974,0.000035809353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013158978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016097466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013158978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002065646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018157648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053400934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969543367","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00275.x","title":"Postapartheid Justice: Can Cosmopolitanism and Nation-Building Be Reconciled?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Harm; Sovereignty; Crimes against humanity; International law; War crime","score_opus":0.03441776350165194,"score_gpt":0.33687557103262505,"score_spread":0.3024578075309731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969543367","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12438057,0.25010607,0.0015231923,0.3467413,0.0013103804,0.00007927967,0.000023784494,0.000010090302,0.27582538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9129102,0.057039663,0.000354066,0.017966656,0.0005577791,0.00005619697,0.000013790664,0.000004988145,0.011096688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961993,0.0019916696,0.0001161817,0.00018037803,0.0006518394,0.00086061016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968111,0.001792627,0.00051936426,0.00013950339,0.00034304825,0.0003942518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044067483,0.00013859873,0.000432534,0.0013623805,0.0047290674,0.0048216567,0.000697534,0.0034169073,0.0027052115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010279118,0.00014143468,0.00026901194,0.0011011594,0.016082203,0.0058575748,0.003739223,0.0030869378,0.00018589915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020832387,0.000056974874,0.0021298954,0.0003563386,0.000022499522,0.0009765736,0.009958676,0.00011829451,0.00012869728,0.92192477,0.0075071985,0.056799337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065982924,0.0001806218,0.019512033,0.002701904,0.000067771885,0.0010645798,0.036896467,0.00016456253,0.00039424052,0.39113948,0.5477695,0.00004282055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012845462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034582984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012845462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048535904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014887645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035215437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969839827","doi":"10.4314/jjs.v28i1.27135","title":"Groepsgedingvoering - die voorstel van die Suid-Afrikaanse Regskommissie vir die sertifisering van 'n groepsgeding","year":2004,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Die (integrated circuit); Theology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.04650540702735572,"score_gpt":0.35488767523740283,"score_spread":0.3083822682100471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969839827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012816998,0.0041824663,0.0017213002,0.023129603,0.0014448967,0.00015694147,0.0017011248,0.00013637547,0.9547103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.062402997,0.0016552695,0.0014701234,0.008044504,0.00028632695,0.0001221233,0.0008232046,0.00012289065,0.92507255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735117,0.00035331218,0.00015500517,0.00038990917,0.00095502706,0.00079552655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992107,0.00023254329,0.000074974705,0.00008627981,0.0002682767,0.0001272856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014051053,0.0004255478,0.0002483776,0.0004896641,0.0043376344,0.00455763,0.000698079,0.003119771,0.092906736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034094136,0.00036878526,0.00040569887,0.0008204084,0.0023436097,0.0025899038,0.0024056414,0.0036374056,0.02365719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079432204,0.00008269888,0.0024321047,0.0002270544,0.0000143054,0.00029442305,0.009275832,0.00015316975,0.002421051,0.48214388,0.44266367,0.06021235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005085031,0.00001548852,0.003474032,0.00005307058,0.0000031724285,0.00004104819,0.001044435,0.000013093765,0.00042452133,0.0029316244,0.9919829,0.000011546747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16286561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3204503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16286561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038682004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010613519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32383525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973913384","doi":"10.1515/ldr-2013-0022","title":"Assessing the Organisation pour l’harmonisation en Afrique du droit des affaires’s Contributions to Poverty Reduction in Africa: A Grounded Outlook","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law and Development Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Political science; Poverty reduction; Member states; Sustainable development; Political economy; Welfare economics; Development economics; Sociology; Business; Law; Economics; International trade; European union","score_opus":0.0340829679989631,"score_gpt":0.3254963322359437,"score_spread":0.2914133642369806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973913384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6983482,0.012500112,0.012889932,0.025200304,0.00021062458,0.00026467114,0.00020473334,0.000012677877,0.25036865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930815,0.0022052503,0.00265747,0.00028034864,0.000028174303,0.00004671363,0.000025389432,0.0000028985203,0.0016723054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99247,0.00470101,0.00022107679,0.00035157162,0.0013366055,0.0009196927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99043685,0.006281298,0.0011113043,0.0002921504,0.0016342347,0.00024425727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010606347,0.00028352605,0.000350714,0.0019890005,0.0020741394,0.006285287,0.0005878353,0.0014295181,0.0029701937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014018303,0.000162037,0.00038462007,0.0022181123,0.0052547124,0.004233533,0.004150384,0.0016615409,0.00011846896],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011547094,0.00016034962,0.055886663,0.00085644546,0.000105242216,0.0007017068,0.057405148,0.003985021,0.0014328004,0.75204057,0.0019074332,0.12540318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004110235,0.00058919314,0.14981332,0.0070269536,0.00019180498,0.0006006344,0.39241695,0.008274072,0.0035516038,0.19733731,0.24006256,0.0000944775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009236263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010242654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010606347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005131849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004501223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05609238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978776847","doi":"10.1093/ijrl/eep026","title":"Recognizing Socio-Economic Refugees in South Africa: a Principled and Rights-Based Approach to Section 3(b) of the Refugees Act","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Refugee Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Section (typography); Political science; Law; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.02070061146262324,"score_gpt":0.3155815534253494,"score_spread":0.29488094196272613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978776847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2588173,0.01697054,0.07823427,0.3142877,0.0015723879,0.0016380978,0.000117330324,0.000050401224,0.32831195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95922667,0.0040519875,0.01637246,0.008086689,0.0002342742,0.000456369,0.00002213673,0.0000101761825,0.011539162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954482,0.002988773,0.00019594553,0.00023356348,0.00048624573,0.0006473036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99750155,0.0016499256,0.0003740707,0.0001209221,0.00016918624,0.00018432774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009068427,0.0004548758,0.00035757624,0.0015643456,0.009840824,0.01063459,0.002138128,0.007169564,0.0019116091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064700427,0.00040632917,0.0005272263,0.0012933539,0.037295785,0.005856331,0.009019133,0.0058905883,0.00024316167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046152345,0.000023481187,0.0007876359,0.00009723923,0.000003502103,0.0010694664,0.07734392,0.0003064841,0.000348666,0.9116836,0.0016235511,0.006707827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031652857,0.00008164909,0.0046012886,0.001620603,0.000028979279,0.0018003008,0.26533535,0.0015043583,0.0008734822,0.48214248,0.24191202,0.00006777442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012042943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025144752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012042943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061854613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016773682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04795903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979366558","doi":"10.7202/042249ar","title":"La protection sociale et judiciaire de la jeunesse, premier pas vers une réforme globale du droit de la famille","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Legislator; Statute; Statutory law; Political science; Law; Legislation; Family law; Context (archaeology); Legislature; Humanities; Civil code; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.007688240797605933,"score_gpt":0.2658689147577636,"score_spread":0.25818067396015765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979366558","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1022652,0.05131073,0.003931737,0.28122607,0.001953586,0.0000877988,0.0002566213,0.00010104018,0.5588672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8286302,0.012282395,0.003215314,0.026581643,0.00092848117,0.000088242465,0.00009381553,0.000050207353,0.12812977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744844,0.0007034888,0.00011098555,0.0003524993,0.00051735365,0.0008672789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974717,0.0011982342,0.00030781064,0.00028092734,0.0003162439,0.00042507978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00281024,0.00035522605,0.0003931239,0.0008337628,0.00471603,0.0055336426,0.00062457356,0.0036824415,0.0069179367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064862873,0.0002496918,0.00029010553,0.00085625675,0.012497077,0.0028513395,0.0028534052,0.0060662935,0.0008662703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020227522,0.000020108733,0.002721572,0.00012603716,0.0000137731495,0.0002687352,0.01800886,0.00012934144,0.0010188385,0.93631625,0.017261663,0.02409461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037641315,0.00008676235,0.017517721,0.00073390634,0.000026203496,0.0004917419,0.0091594625,0.00012531954,0.0008142967,0.06415836,0.9068051,0.000043514865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10315165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1669542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10315165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007154597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012543272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2051025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979388471","doi":"10.1080/03056240108704538","title":"The Lesotho highlands corruption trial: who has been airbrushed from the dock?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of African Political Economy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Language change; Political science; Government (linguistics); Geography; Economic history; Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04535999257637842,"score_gpt":0.3380758899715409,"score_spread":0.2927158973951625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979388471","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019412803,0.044284496,0.00011408874,0.8715272,0.0034438318,0.000030784762,0.000075442076,0.000009678481,0.06110159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38312417,0.060864907,0.00032308098,0.45085344,0.003877717,0.000100023426,0.000097011965,0.00004941574,0.10071028],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813473,0.0005722599,0.0000701883,0.000095175106,0.0005000048,0.0006275638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961874,0.0014977948,0.0005260082,0.00008456692,0.00052720367,0.0011771354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003409644,0.00021399568,0.00035280874,0.0007626263,0.008037931,0.006819145,0.00076207635,0.004171922,0.0126401745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009906048,0.00016790407,0.00020707834,0.0017093152,0.006222212,0.003202287,0.002462111,0.005860547,0.0009380155],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015779493,0.00009523201,0.007943385,0.0008790006,0.00004128546,0.0035997422,0.015346159,0.00011234267,0.00033847924,0.17466038,0.6721852,0.124641046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085396285,0.00003984255,0.016345495,0.002163614,0.000026027314,0.0005541424,0.031372685,0.000052954936,0.00022423331,0.011709327,0.9373969,0.00002934946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07903148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16938806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07903148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007295974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015569791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15714288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979641765","doi":"10.1353/ccj.2006.0016","title":"Gone But Not Forgotten: Should Judges Be Allowed to Remedy by Re-sentencing?","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Prison; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12624068618915282,"score_gpt":0.331878685057201,"score_spread":0.20563799886804815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979641765","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027039558,0.0070092017,0.0010549503,0.920106,0.0048946724,0.00006230226,0.000048376474,0.000043006374,0.03974196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5944692,0.0060668844,0.0019078541,0.35762364,0.002839409,0.00017578919,0.00005466857,0.00008432036,0.036778368],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96842414,0.012122751,0.002318475,0.002905333,0.0052403132,0.008989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9588385,0.020821663,0.0038442244,0.0022166974,0.008976722,0.005302167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02950545,0.00033425214,0.00068738067,0.0010817467,0.015847607,0.012296587,0.0038847167,0.030617332,0.0059956675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13559642,0.0006483535,0.00063124794,0.0012039687,0.017112596,0.012870931,0.004711014,0.02178168,0.0014691841],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017525886,0.00013517006,0.012270403,0.0008422604,0.00005360484,0.0034976525,0.0672256,0.0001874033,0.0012059825,0.3333294,0.5046315,0.07644564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017448918,0.00018533615,0.02405043,0.0036942374,0.00014367263,0.0015032006,0.12838145,0.00046284733,0.0017012926,0.09946993,0.7399515,0.00028165494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12502013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2737578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12502013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009367613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034773882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24858487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981031201","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2001/v4i1a2878","title":"Utilizing constitutional values in constitutional comparison","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proscription; Constitutional law; Affirmative action; Law; Political science; Public law; Mores; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03607853444442566,"score_gpt":0.3597977281514343,"score_spread":0.32371919370700863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981031201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029042743,0.0059359297,0.414454,0.019649256,0.00093970215,0.0003571224,0.00025688706,0.00016676137,0.5291977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.815137,0.0023868135,0.16905633,0.0017336896,0.0006261424,0.00096725475,0.00017785998,0.00016569176,0.0097491685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9473591,0.043828625,0.0011208336,0.0020973403,0.0040880307,0.0015061034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9735979,0.018959384,0.0015191986,0.0032662607,0.0019534263,0.0007037883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045126077,0.000783789,0.0010707985,0.009176327,0.007429543,0.017043848,0.0024315072,0.0042693387,0.005866751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04553247,0.00056004553,0.0007167517,0.007340922,0.053189516,0.024197131,0.011161793,0.0057070167,0.00050878053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017991089,0.0000019557883,0.00004217951,0.000009245334,0.0000015478582,0.000008754475,0.00044405946,0.00008191705,0.000012365502,0.9973495,0.0001301295,0.0019165302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005414169,0.000010424219,0.00009547505,0.000056924753,0.0000042109696,0.000019558538,0.0010437957,0.0003854266,0.0001140643,0.9826979,0.015557458,0.000009398727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022582565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030993372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045126077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010590966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00567912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23865235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981637557","doi":"10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.10.003","title":"WITHDRAWN: The Challenges of Poverty Reduction and Environmental Conservation in South Africa's Extended Public Works Programme (EPWP)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Geography","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":true,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty reduction; Geography; Poverty; Reduction (mathematics); Environmental protection; Environmental planning; Socioeconomics; Economic growth; Sociology; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.027539686959031088,"score_gpt":0.2312380130161004,"score_spread":0.2036983260570693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981637557","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019158384,0.007313331,0.00047539014,0.9151514,0.005946873,0.00010241635,0.00025075418,0.000029731927,0.051571757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25446686,0.008865624,0.0012770351,0.51861143,0.009069748,0.0004993931,0.00021645745,0.00017351858,0.20681997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99519026,0.0017233159,0.0004875627,0.0003763228,0.0011140292,0.0011084898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99035925,0.005841715,0.00062707154,0.00036101034,0.0015854453,0.00122563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0095249815,0.0007087718,0.0006436957,0.0011087101,0.0122409575,0.017375233,0.002918009,0.026692245,0.014248541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022478208,0.0005244673,0.00055382546,0.0022192998,0.008306751,0.009364955,0.008348598,0.018868163,0.0014068767],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080292346,0.00010602906,0.0030922897,0.00061124715,0.000044549506,0.0020197192,0.031351753,0.00050921616,0.0016073768,0.49758616,0.4191667,0.043824643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078225996,0.000044270455,0.009007056,0.00065408746,0.00004172228,0.00038993297,0.018863464,0.00023380331,0.0006785794,0.049665526,0.92026526,0.00007818952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0721381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08609494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0721381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057697496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02973759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14343643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982423120","doi":"10.7202/1027114ar","title":"La responsabilité relative au permis de construction en droit québécois","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01006139143739615,"score_gpt":0.2631221719150196,"score_spread":0.2530607804776234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982423120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84355706,0.0005046809,0.002162528,0.0023647884,0.00005207581,0.00008275992,0.0004936741,0.00005230406,0.15073016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85814553,0.000270427,0.00083814375,0.00017286971,0.000009598878,0.000042083124,0.00019106413,0.000031779582,0.14029844],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702555,0.00043772164,0.00005913481,0.00027709256,0.0010839015,0.0011164702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996885,0.00036623378,0.0002677937,0.00015432191,0.0013936542,0.0009330745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017749064,0.00029043652,0.00024155593,0.0011681526,0.0071691424,0.0035482193,0.0012970015,0.0008856429,0.018147834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031128428,0.0003677066,0.00031353932,0.0014777144,0.0033557762,0.0009734228,0.0023422418,0.001128853,0.0011636812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030382388,0.0001970473,0.39552298,0.00031406045,0.00012099562,0.0030039148,0.19432577,0.0046390723,0.012146995,0.1801485,0.036238953,0.17303798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008474785,0.000074266856,0.70613295,0.0002046789,0.000033568267,0.00021358594,0.063331395,0.00084452605,0.001388677,0.0015996124,0.22607218,0.00009614283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95654064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9904394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043459356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03992356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031649616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28966707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983570010","doi":"10.4314/ad.v34i3-4.63525","title":"1 - Wasted Citizenship? Reclaimers and the Privatised Expansion of the Public Sphere","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Africa Development","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Public sphere; Citizenship; Realm; Livelihood; Private sphere; Governmentality; Political economy; Public administration; Commons; Dismissal; Negotiation; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.02885563251180901,"score_gpt":0.2602801075770594,"score_spread":0.23142447506525038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983570010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17920402,0.0063394094,0.012951378,0.14156751,0.0004150106,0.00010339075,0.00011546905,0.000105965606,0.65919787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689332,0.0009196519,0.00072582636,0.0031471804,0.0001229389,0.000047640526,0.000020746338,0.00003978716,0.02604297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98940325,0.005363854,0.0004046834,0.0013192851,0.0014686277,0.0020402225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99162275,0.003984262,0.0013821115,0.0017000098,0.0009227618,0.00038807452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007883704,0.00041759934,0.0005398999,0.0013608944,0.012597961,0.014675144,0.0016644623,0.007699817,0.010451723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013623034,0.00037776737,0.0005039316,0.0023278578,0.07514727,0.02115913,0.013161461,0.0063294885,0.0011382537],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049444902,0.000006452313,0.00022799634,0.000022086942,0.0000010197346,0.000096373034,0.01255935,0.00004283356,0.000057867208,0.98339754,0.0011784163,0.0024050975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018828212,0.000037010534,0.0012248891,0.00058883923,0.000010828892,0.000459987,0.051735956,0.00024746708,0.0009595166,0.63215876,0.31251386,0.000043964887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011106281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011102322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014675144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0109643955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010989477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07955259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985833149","doi":"10.1163/221097312x13397499736787","title":"Enforcing Fundamental Rights in Nigerian Courts – Processes and Challenges","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Redress; Constitution; Law; Fundamental rights; Political science; Jurisdiction; Human rights; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05640802013070071,"score_gpt":0.3423379376105661,"score_spread":0.28592991747986535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985833149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41488895,0.014382017,0.031059995,0.13841195,0.0006970893,0.0007831586,0.000078630845,0.00007946961,0.39961874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98691225,0.0016081103,0.0052378126,0.0012568305,0.00010252704,0.000058420323,0.000007891281,0.000006264021,0.004809981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97757393,0.012527528,0.0011395811,0.00089972385,0.0055347392,0.0023243849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94756657,0.036127094,0.0043826415,0.0027360376,0.0076977382,0.0014899054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044138137,0.00024926435,0.0004688357,0.0019514821,0.007848883,0.017767861,0.0016631592,0.005130783,0.0032701727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037089754,0.00050235994,0.0002777472,0.0014391786,0.022415586,0.007726956,0.004486453,0.0050065345,0.00024553447],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000888655,0.000043985634,0.0009462851,0.00006885332,0.0000036484764,0.00029519282,0.006697137,0.00045370637,0.00033684887,0.9778485,0.0010404423,0.012256676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054655102,0.000091468384,0.0046091396,0.0015379221,0.000014082581,0.00037150658,0.022148661,0.004006904,0.0016381278,0.8768715,0.0885728,0.0000832679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011822403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014799305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044138137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010404975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022361409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23342752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987225883","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2008.00015.x","title":"Conceptualizing attorney general conduct in Charter litigation: From independence to central agency","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Political science; Charter; Law; Supreme court","score_opus":0.0915259864041464,"score_gpt":0.3303397594812043,"score_spread":0.23881377307705792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987225883","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25820702,0.0064873165,0.12421529,0.053439364,0.00036341508,0.00060330075,0.000057579742,0.00011237554,0.55651426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872385,0.0007019022,0.0063358448,0.001182679,0.00016685859,0.00017956713,0.000015108002,0.000018096436,0.004161414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94377846,0.03568104,0.0022802765,0.003565837,0.008999899,0.00569444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9551483,0.02835101,0.0059266887,0.00239258,0.004199024,0.0039823996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037121985,0.00073207973,0.0007515365,0.008342375,0.012441565,0.028446417,0.004294512,0.015630886,0.00303526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034396846,0.00097952,0.0009806841,0.006095057,0.08530323,0.017224187,0.012204941,0.010657286,0.00039523953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058299784,0.00002302852,0.0012068222,0.00000963058,0.000003581508,0.00016068964,0.0076102368,0.0006769043,0.00004617158,0.98858786,0.00027117683,0.0013980971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007959725,0.000112735455,0.005049286,0.0007363744,0.00006327892,0.0005330391,0.02750632,0.010010408,0.0003670154,0.9025851,0.052872553,0.000084363724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0632951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029672975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9643231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035676897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033397835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25885522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991712514","doi":"10.1163/221097312x13397499735869","title":"Violence, Amnesty and Transitional Law: “private” Acts and “public” Truth in South Africa","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Amnesty; Impunity; Transitional justice; Political science; Law; Normative; Democracy; Politics; Human rights; International law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03779984685403315,"score_gpt":0.3056065072990975,"score_spread":0.26780666044506435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991712514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84104645,0.011296111,0.0015487565,0.053679444,0.00010187837,0.000042990374,0.000016370863,0.000007651,0.09226034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99864954,0.0005213304,0.00008293421,0.0002850017,0.000008613382,0.0000056530253,7.6315325e-7,7.6091055e-7,0.00044549952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973273,0.0017171946,0.000113941576,0.000107980435,0.00020553969,0.00052796956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99214315,0.0055613564,0.0013765236,0.00015984263,0.00028585477,0.00047320576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038311766,0.00021514462,0.00028689156,0.0019531818,0.010628576,0.0071747582,0.0005023755,0.0023680665,0.0029231398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008578953,0.00027010936,0.00018416629,0.0015081507,0.043253087,0.0047605196,0.007282749,0.003602307,0.000082465536],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037114994,0.0000393908,0.00722134,0.00019376207,0.000008892143,0.001920867,0.18326929,0.00024438708,0.00037998252,0.79696625,0.00076652656,0.008952126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005052097,0.0001329259,0.030680224,0.0018243052,0.00003976995,0.0023169615,0.48657423,0.0012973696,0.0017023784,0.40462896,0.07068164,0.00007063871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019233352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025196638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019233352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009189273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070738355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06667322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999535358","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2010/v13i3a2691","title":"Rethinking Volks V Robinson: The Implications of Applying a \"Contextaulised Choice Model\" to Prospective South African Domestic Partnerships Legislation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Sine qua non; Law; Jurisprudence; General partnership; Duty; Legislation; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.059355931468528064,"score_gpt":0.3419609162935602,"score_spread":0.2826049848250321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999535358","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.103388295,0.0054623466,0.037574004,0.4787263,0.0020341673,0.0004670304,0.00014760844,0.000110261855,0.37208995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91461265,0.001277061,0.0076403324,0.058759447,0.00035840162,0.00024077923,0.000017595174,0.000046737543,0.01704685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97311515,0.015938422,0.00067333516,0.0025183037,0.005485428,0.002269457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97908187,0.01739224,0.00071370427,0.00096774206,0.0011067054,0.00073778594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032635484,0.0004910298,0.000781677,0.001256946,0.007437537,0.01026302,0.004388812,0.014213249,0.0040354454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035199963,0.00061450474,0.00095139234,0.0010990351,0.043379597,0.010764116,0.009371371,0.014622065,0.0004123032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034242926,0.0000028917607,0.000059128426,0.000010023157,0.0000014178153,0.000061234605,0.002357114,0.0001016806,0.00002802164,0.9956513,0.0009775031,0.00074627204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009725487,0.00009468161,0.0007538392,0.0005294564,0.000038445447,0.00020840336,0.008543824,0.003295633,0.0006962694,0.8544787,0.13116191,0.00010151346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07617446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09868291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07617446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015591952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028213605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17259496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001470746","doi":"10.3917/polaf.091.0083","title":"«Maman bat papa»","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Politique africaine","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029664676324288472,"score_gpt":0.31665467822553506,"score_spread":0.28699000190124657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001470746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6888584,0.006519678,0.0044459114,0.011066584,0.00038912904,0.00024219452,0.00030435732,0.0000644197,0.28810936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93316156,0.0049362285,0.0026632496,0.00086772785,0.000055479977,0.00018986197,0.00010667958,0.000019117113,0.058000077],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997929,0.00008030021,0.0000065575914,0.000023958712,0.000028497512,0.00006785825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969256,0.00014262553,0.000072550094,0.000018863691,0.000046662975,0.000026721267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037907943,0.00031448173,0.0001886114,0.0005614809,0.0033026924,0.0015740172,0.00033644756,0.000453157,0.00948351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012225441,0.00017577775,0.00015238352,0.0008119467,0.0013032802,0.0009876931,0.0012781121,0.0007233315,0.00089541805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021589472,0.00018306173,0.07961117,0.0020723504,0.000074895135,0.014800239,0.31805342,0.0007544088,0.011858639,0.27550203,0.011731376,0.28514263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021026177,0.00027765875,0.12572862,0.0012484995,0.000063565894,0.006458724,0.19709052,0.0008587332,0.004437958,0.016923726,0.64684093,0.00005007893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013767414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030640887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013767414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014428837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021141164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031725526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002031328","doi":"10.7202/1021211ar","title":"Environmental Justice and Human Rights on the Mining Wastelands of the Witwatersrand Gold Fields","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Settlement (finance); Transformative learning; Politics; Environmental justice; Statutory law; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Order (exchange); Social rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Economics","score_opus":0.011698180579348079,"score_gpt":0.2370247737388817,"score_spread":0.22532659315953363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002031328","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7091075,0.013046814,0.0010894726,0.021526054,0.00012439468,0.00008493041,0.00006872249,0.000010354824,0.25494167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98435056,0.0017064459,0.00021400013,0.000555865,0.000029481633,0.000023601662,0.000009339691,0.0000048336824,0.013105904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852604,0.0006322721,0.000052614298,0.00014419308,0.00015781587,0.00048712018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888974,0.00078513357,0.00015945017,0.00005126478,0.00004165528,0.00007271714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001616212,0.0003118609,0.0003985372,0.0015119958,0.01347332,0.006319564,0.0007913377,0.0034724409,0.006151872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027142134,0.00036932706,0.00015438664,0.0026143468,0.040311243,0.0044455384,0.005002301,0.0023989275,0.0002135102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027522468,0.000029360783,0.0010429523,0.00012332456,0.000006404938,0.002321741,0.098556116,0.00030779096,0.0012629222,0.88131565,0.0015045118,0.013501788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009166093,0.00012469642,0.028334118,0.0016593623,0.000035532008,0.0015661444,0.27674764,0.0004485992,0.0027919146,0.34878507,0.33931276,0.00010253239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.082721256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20516409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082721256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009682252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065216343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16447955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W200252722","doi":"","title":"Criminal justice and political cultures : national and international dimensions of crime control","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Willan eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Crime control; Policy transfer; Criminal justice; Criminology; Politics; Cultural criminology; Embeddedness; Sociology; Organised crime; Imprisonment; Opposition (politics); Political science; Law; Social science; Public administration","score_opus":0.02616812384129907,"score_gpt":0.3362722245047189,"score_spread":0.3101041006634198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W200252722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028680544,0.24739578,0.00095182384,0.036204964,0.004380777,0.000027901573,0.00008529686,0.000045235593,0.7080402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19841275,0.25729603,0.0017928006,0.00930291,0.004979895,0.00016708253,0.00028257968,0.00020023991,0.5275658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993135,0.00029419022,0.000027761786,0.000074305586,0.00020601877,0.0000843551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920243,0.00036825438,0.000074698815,0.000048579826,0.00015596047,0.00015017865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006573983,0.0007221582,0.00044684752,0.0016841457,0.0030900827,0.0056853276,0.00046061733,0.00084493135,0.013512348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015541834,0.00024369595,0.00017751733,0.0038515327,0.0074261436,0.0042521637,0.00223122,0.0025556278,0.0018188538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000109746225,0.000030554627,0.0008953255,0.00024464165,0.0000063693487,0.000067339686,0.017660242,0.00014826993,0.0000698101,0.5290985,0.35593745,0.095830515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023746484,0.0000075297016,0.0014382652,0.00066924683,0.0000038796343,0.000088993125,0.0058361012,0.00005154124,0.000032415483,0.04224789,0.9496156,0.00000618799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011609535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028707456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013512348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003321534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003401009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04520327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005609060","doi":"10.1080/03057070.2013.814299","title":"The History of Dispossession at Orania and the Politics of Land Restitution in South Africa","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Southern African Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Trillium Foundation; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Politics; Political science; Land reform; Political economy; Geography; Sociology; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03186419755194626,"score_gpt":0.28956580843322477,"score_spread":0.2577016108812785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005609060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38893953,0.026553618,0.000984066,0.058745038,0.00039760568,0.000060160317,0.00007956224,0.000016381311,0.52422404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97775954,0.0035774452,0.00011467721,0.00240312,0.00011350138,0.000022419617,0.000008416327,0.000017331147,0.015983488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980557,0.00078716653,0.00006535054,0.00014498732,0.00020898714,0.00073778816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837947,0.0010609748,0.00024320208,0.00007848694,0.00007931154,0.00015862087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026929472,0.00023129245,0.00040809836,0.0012311947,0.016376112,0.007081939,0.0007635767,0.003845206,0.007683683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042111785,0.00048547526,0.00022359558,0.002829653,0.03316427,0.006175219,0.007879651,0.0075305477,0.00021849232],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030166142,0.000013114444,0.00064375275,0.00011781185,0.0000060617303,0.0009465341,0.11686071,0.000112405905,0.00046473753,0.87373596,0.0018500435,0.0052186535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027888856,0.00006068085,0.01309708,0.0010543846,0.000024596506,0.0009043382,0.116098955,0.0002762917,0.0012417687,0.12899916,0.7381336,0.0000812224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043765515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06809676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043765515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01471158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069833016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106740475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005853945","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2007.tb02136.x","title":"Ethics and good urban governance in Toronto: The Bellamy report and integrity in public service","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Public service; Political science; Corporate governance; Government (linguistics); Politics; Economic Justice; Public administration; Ethical code; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Management; Philosophy","score_opus":0.046468823105330855,"score_gpt":0.34395580008495186,"score_spread":0.297486976979621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005853945","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31795284,0.009397162,0.0013252723,0.4358059,0.0005829683,0.00008946419,0.00030270804,0.0000461408,0.23449753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9706981,0.0020292772,0.0002682236,0.004899696,0.000094968505,0.000024481651,0.00005014607,0.000019867335,0.021915315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912854,0.0027770372,0.00029839732,0.0004233856,0.0024645186,0.0027512705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98322946,0.006651822,0.0020206028,0.00080538145,0.0033922964,0.0039004206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048465803,0.00030855098,0.00024601226,0.0008636021,0.026656702,0.011227412,0.0013609753,0.004219523,0.006229213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012723451,0.00042639134,0.00019056935,0.002357567,0.02708101,0.0030846086,0.006284524,0.004924851,0.0002794898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047715577,0.000036956975,0.021582516,0.00025603315,0.000022339305,0.0016912498,0.29427844,0.0010085132,0.00034358003,0.5177705,0.14140806,0.021554079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020519345,0.00003774391,0.07518032,0.00059114315,0.00003606333,0.0003978786,0.35379884,0.000823785,0.00053118216,0.029279955,0.5391588,0.00014377346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97253203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98394275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84603953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15396047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12910147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9812859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006029855","doi":"10.15173/glj.v4i2.1138","title":"Marikana Massacre and Strike Violence Post-Apartheid","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Labour Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); State (computer science); Political economy; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Law; Geography; Economics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.006321270030581632,"score_gpt":0.26750298906715736,"score_spread":0.2611817190365757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006029855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9107692,0.005708597,0.00013690803,0.019801978,0.00013645871,0.000029016215,0.00028860001,0.0000036295307,0.06312562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959805,0.0011565478,0.000027647986,0.0002494123,0.00003789953,0.00000986965,0.000027776983,0.0000011382307,0.0025092105],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904674,0.00028012434,0.000034967507,0.000066249806,0.000105550236,0.00046629875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830484,0.000537446,0.0008070601,0.000046508078,0.00011781136,0.00018622846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070389296,0.00014839889,0.00022943779,0.00096872,0.0042757085,0.0020275551,0.00038905384,0.0010487874,0.013571007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041580894,0.00013602959,0.00012374335,0.0015843614,0.0030633484,0.0011232697,0.0026609898,0.0017228051,0.00030878934],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044113823,0.00041789436,0.31117955,0.0010864659,0.00008608618,0.008485025,0.37782916,0.0007016049,0.0010934541,0.1968889,0.016525246,0.0852655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017601578,0.00012771755,0.65262365,0.0016692088,0.000021155198,0.0013034141,0.25684935,0.00012929452,0.000376305,0.012540845,0.0743105,0.00003103563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029245295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05608781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029245295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026573958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019560542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058150113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006585367","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v3n1p100","title":"Consideration of Obscene Speech in Prejudication in US Constitution","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitution; Law; Stipulation; Norm (philosophy); Constitutionalism; Judicial review; Political science; Value (mathematics); Promulgation; Sociology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.017782963657851984,"score_gpt":0.32359257935176267,"score_spread":0.3058096156939107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006585367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2068771,0.0055922633,0.02649996,0.05584354,0.001229423,0.00011800462,0.00009224516,0.000051782357,0.7036957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835263,0.0006197233,0.0026052077,0.0045477417,0.00031358955,0.000053507,0.000011131474,0.000027097649,0.00829565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99026614,0.0049746144,0.00059048785,0.00091388455,0.0019879527,0.0012669398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99073505,0.0063575357,0.0006782216,0.0008801653,0.00090246805,0.00044656708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008837504,0.00036596504,0.00056044786,0.0015817591,0.010436622,0.011317456,0.0010152744,0.0073387297,0.003593174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018638982,0.0005313207,0.0006412752,0.0013299513,0.030639239,0.008927249,0.005526431,0.011504862,0.00026562178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069269768,0.000005517566,0.00028461975,0.000012284386,0.0000028533125,0.00019637255,0.0050126626,0.000101344165,0.00018940555,0.99155855,0.00056642253,0.0020630506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028815692,0.000058912978,0.0026396043,0.00040066402,0.00004491782,0.00044787762,0.00770288,0.001186218,0.0015376953,0.8904466,0.09544202,0.00006384809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010992514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019070689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011317456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062890765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049822554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04673773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008300074","doi":"10.1177/095624780201400205","title":"Developing citizenship among urban youth in conflict with the law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Urbanization","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Centre for Comparative Criminology","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Criminology; Political science; Inclusion (mineral); Local government; Punishment (psychology); Government (linguistics); Inclusion–exclusion principle; Key (lock); Public administration; Public relations; Economic growth; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Gender studies; Politics","score_opus":0.033232065990055425,"score_gpt":0.22263105020884905,"score_spread":0.18939898421879361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008300074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97313607,0.00013577614,0.00033261618,0.0038926622,0.000030899824,0.00005857116,0.0000101824335,0.000015433969,0.022387784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954426,0.00020922386,0.0004172503,0.00035777738,0.000009711935,0.0000365034,0.000015276293,0.000006279443,0.0035052425],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978623,0.0009959621,0.000043801312,0.00008453301,0.00011177326,0.00090159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976954,0.0003864065,0.00032477602,0.00010636181,0.00023522535,0.0012517363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022881844,0.00020104786,0.00025647233,0.0008295366,0.0068309745,0.0046230997,0.00066860387,0.00086933805,0.0034578193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036272614,0.00024400075,0.00027611025,0.00059663097,0.0041417354,0.0019749883,0.009076044,0.0017267821,0.00038554153],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059544695,0.0014630152,0.16163024,0.00011826663,0.000024137378,0.0022531732,0.67107975,0.00019176789,0.002732958,0.039609917,0.007182664,0.11365467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048135353,0.00055226975,0.09287193,0.00018380475,0.00004097126,0.0009325051,0.8093927,0.00047902288,0.0024339228,0.008314114,0.0847227,0.00002797901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006477539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016633797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068309745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018400134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005773827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013350248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009151479","doi":"10.7202/1013030ar","title":"African Customary Marriages in South Africa and the Intricacies of a Mixed Legal System: Judicial (In)novatio or Confusio?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legal pluralism; Legislature; Constitutionalism; Comparative law; Legal history; Indigenous; Legal profession; Family law; Civil law (Civil law); Marriage law; Common law; Legal realism; Public law; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.028546077294312085,"score_gpt":0.27755494852196305,"score_spread":0.24900887122765097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009151479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6707,0.03480077,0.0018705486,0.070595704,0.0003306865,0.00006508884,0.000027302849,0.000010659868,0.22159922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899115,0.0053847143,0.00025504196,0.0014135006,0.000060244423,0.00001638745,0.0000038039539,0.000003244027,0.0029515564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877197,0.0005418441,0.000051970394,0.00008194584,0.00015003352,0.00040229087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989127,0.0005493537,0.00026232464,0.000055230303,0.000074991956,0.00014532261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001689343,0.00020770518,0.00021974459,0.0010178976,0.011969553,0.0048818714,0.0006571859,0.002150983,0.0026117705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043706824,0.0003019808,0.00014823045,0.0019697468,0.018268622,0.0042315633,0.0046531,0.002936039,0.00012695923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000083100485,0.000017144544,0.0024119995,0.00010863614,0.000004831383,0.0018438392,0.12505324,0.00006584328,0.00042498182,0.85543084,0.0017810718,0.012849296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003437775,0.00006411814,0.04087742,0.0019238103,0.00003354151,0.0059903087,0.43648538,0.0005639182,0.0009870732,0.20785247,0.30512175,0.00006590875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026730971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06174178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026730971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045651104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006101953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053150773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009552916","doi":"10.4314/ad.v32i3.57190","title":"2 - Developmental Local Government in Post-Apartheid South Africa? A Feminist Rethinking of the State and Development in the Context of Neo-liberalism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Africa Development","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Sociology; State (computer science); Political economy; Government (linguistics); Neoliberalism (international relations); Population; Developmental state; Democracy; Inequality; Political science; Economic growth; Development economics; Gender studies; Politics; Economics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.026413598503755503,"score_gpt":0.2567912888004229,"score_spread":0.2303776902966674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009552916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46688938,0.0084813265,0.0020398207,0.16613583,0.00034825952,0.000077321434,0.00007561836,0.00004339412,0.3559091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97745925,0.0013438165,0.0002476312,0.0014676821,0.000025671121,0.000035448415,0.000009847801,0.000011946983,0.01939879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974498,0.0016020441,0.00004941436,0.00012442215,0.00017853729,0.0005956013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992854,0.00029021112,0.00008126937,0.000053684835,0.00009293813,0.0001965396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025427989,0.00019781115,0.00024803774,0.000900113,0.011847554,0.0070365034,0.00074738957,0.0019904636,0.005123345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021644824,0.0001962122,0.00018675531,0.0015056095,0.02062973,0.004734796,0.007029367,0.0033949325,0.0003844397],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015718371,0.00004792848,0.001867397,0.00013680181,0.0000023966065,0.0009874513,0.31135103,0.00023168499,0.00050440134,0.662813,0.0049236724,0.017118428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009080698,0.000045265915,0.008863152,0.00052896165,0.000004552426,0.00036781703,0.5537451,0.00024005529,0.0004991544,0.039817613,0.39585188,0.000027400158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03902021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08402507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03902021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013997104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011388461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1015566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010061757","doi":"10.7202/042232ar","title":"L'immixtion et la trop grande expertise du propriétaire, cause d'exonération de responsabilité des architectes et des entrepreneurs sous l'article 1688 C.C.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Supreme court; Liability; Law; Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.013526741643153352,"score_gpt":0.2964197419582084,"score_spread":0.28289300031505504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010061757","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048785523,0.017429808,0.0044629658,0.15730977,0.0010991874,0.000057668785,0.000092174065,0.000048772654,0.77071416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7237788,0.0046794997,0.001990139,0.035006028,0.0007897262,0.00012545157,0.000026726233,0.000040703115,0.23356283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945117,0.0013435424,0.00019790053,0.00060421077,0.0019799464,0.0013626121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970439,0.0016017366,0.0004328846,0.00020660702,0.00047686248,0.00023797202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003285365,0.0005333165,0.00028264322,0.0008266273,0.0069291885,0.0066836164,0.0007056698,0.008372342,0.004550468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007632351,0.00040826606,0.00033410496,0.00061659183,0.016666392,0.0028419895,0.0032456936,0.007565202,0.0007424796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013602313,0.00000907076,0.000694027,0.000052600593,0.0000045331376,0.00067232,0.01153748,0.00006712082,0.00056483404,0.9606714,0.01717387,0.008539075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024179973,0.000031188698,0.0034771978,0.00035704178,0.000012545794,0.0011192246,0.007325145,0.00016795534,0.0017033762,0.11610998,0.8696425,0.000029610503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05782265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07792017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05782265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049427226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008056514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114972174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012229299","doi":"10.7202/1013029ar","title":"South Africa: A Diceyan Rechtsstaat?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutionalism; Law; Political science; Doctrine; Constitutional law; Liberal democracy; Rule of law; State (computer science); Democracy; Interpreter; Politics; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.060937889761241405,"score_gpt":0.3179023034452359,"score_spread":0.2569644136839945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012229299","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06747731,0.053740636,0.0049617235,0.4408258,0.0040164883,0.00009827323,0.000088604,0.00005319828,0.4287379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8670513,0.014936399,0.0026430155,0.050645694,0.0007081685,0.000099175995,0.000044895794,0.000052894316,0.06381854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984321,0.0004881565,0.00006667515,0.00026280404,0.00029113676,0.00045909124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994031,0.00029331257,0.00006431128,0.000065121385,0.00008294978,0.000091198395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024469143,0.0003967548,0.00030229104,0.00077066803,0.0067648,0.0044355527,0.000462267,0.0035999084,0.0043288623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044811377,0.00026136494,0.00024539008,0.0011619177,0.012469156,0.006968146,0.0036380738,0.0063983616,0.000484877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015740852,0.0000052142896,0.00024401228,0.00006155497,0.000003442283,0.0004587044,0.010850303,0.0000470439,0.0003823798,0.96992,0.008221161,0.009790533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024424722,0.000024221408,0.0014456748,0.0004353146,0.000011235784,0.0005297995,0.009856564,0.000114755705,0.0006874379,0.17365727,0.8131845,0.00002886261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022684412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03419188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022684412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005983211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068400837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0451048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013627542","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2000.tb01565.x","title":"The South AfricdCanada Program on Governance: an experiment in supporting democracy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada; Government of Ontario","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Corporate governance; Public service; Good governance; Work (physics); Democratic governance; Service (business); Politics; Management; Law; Engineering; Economy; Economics","score_opus":0.02486518913146441,"score_gpt":0.336732285012598,"score_spread":0.3118670958811336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013627542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8893783,0.00011618477,0.0009453888,0.009845452,0.00012222363,0.0040992787,0.00029429514,0.00005288083,0.095145926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729629,0.00016335616,0.0032806974,0.0024251235,0.000032657746,0.005725825,0.00016248747,0.000017247541,0.01522973],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890865,0.0074835983,0.0001446439,0.0004970496,0.0010037988,0.00178439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858132,0.006628378,0.0005883873,0.0012410532,0.0010672878,0.0046616723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015931439,0.00026504754,0.00026723937,0.0004711681,0.008685999,0.002692256,0.0011709231,0.0014405135,0.010871457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010150705,0.00033513663,0.00022970856,0.0012035427,0.004431263,0.001632262,0.0052433833,0.0028670195,0.00071943185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0114022,0.06992102,0.052929375,0.0016764908,0.000121940946,0.002257366,0.21950805,0.0026353933,0.010267057,0.18227692,0.06393935,0.38306484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.032361306,0.029796667,0.19341543,0.0010896749,0.0002183346,0.00024867983,0.22122651,0.0026134755,0.009680379,0.03564458,0.47353554,0.00016949403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07563763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22789498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92436236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008939914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039775286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15039474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014559428","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2013/v16i1a2310","title":"Reasonable and Probable Cause in the Law of Malicious Prosecution: A Review of South African and Commonwealth Decisions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Law; Conviction; Action (physics); Cause of action; Discretion; Political science; Reasonable doubt; Commonwealth","score_opus":0.0806131554190942,"score_gpt":0.39180385668970136,"score_spread":0.31119070127060716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014559428","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042299824,0.96426135,0.00042451735,0.019194033,0.0006925698,0.000028370187,0.000024748457,0.0000048465035,0.011139615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.051026564,0.9399301,0.00056279096,0.0059616435,0.000663741,0.000030435102,0.000017946268,0.0000116091915,0.0017950891],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940513,0.0019842067,0.000979326,0.00034903712,0.0020641095,0.00057196873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9664906,0.026405552,0.0026182903,0.00040591543,0.003396346,0.00068335544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015776467,0.0006891339,0.00082291075,0.013769627,0.003442431,0.0068829693,0.0016851496,0.004344217,0.00274565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03145401,0.00090845546,0.000733482,0.014760658,0.01393355,0.006918952,0.0030758216,0.00477777,0.0005390266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008817979,0.00013303709,0.008851568,0.022916665,0.00011576753,0.0041378075,0.041608207,0.0007767948,0.0011084266,0.32531944,0.068587676,0.5263564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018951032,0.00014053917,0.02483398,0.074455984,0.00015178022,0.0035431592,0.01869874,0.00036949816,0.00061753613,0.03379893,0.84325653,0.00011435161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036379114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07177958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036379114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008795311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029637525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08343494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014918168","doi":"10.1177/002070200906400211","title":"Contact Africa","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Peacekeeping; International court; Political science; Security council; Independence (probability theory); General assembly; Law; League; Foreign policy; Collective security; Public administration; Politics; International law; Public international law","score_opus":0.012180476186127465,"score_gpt":0.345523314866636,"score_spread":0.33334283868050857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014918168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00073928654,0.0012227795,0.0003104871,0.0019989815,0.0009215656,0.000074131734,0.0011118392,0.0002521069,0.9933689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0055900486,0.0007757972,0.00026449875,0.0011327866,0.00012379287,0.000058447065,0.00076397136,0.00011328941,0.99117744],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994678,0.00008860502,0.000024240135,0.00013352383,0.00013262569,0.0001533326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967027,0.000037454607,0.000023880773,0.00005466155,0.00011432475,0.00009956635],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037743564,0.0008297924,0.00036109763,0.0010159909,0.003219606,0.004335055,0.0009228025,0.001831572,0.7151783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012536896,0.00031307276,0.00028829623,0.0013321165,0.0004189057,0.0028839235,0.0033634843,0.001613343,0.44204792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054000862,0.000045450226,0.00050152384,0.00027336847,0.0000044011367,0.00043180384,0.00067770673,0.00003930468,0.0007462115,0.042847726,0.8120838,0.14229462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017450944,0.0000036412607,0.00014445683,0.000026684136,5.382037e-7,0.00007197987,0.00016877202,0.0000062515455,0.000039666684,0.00046979514,0.99906534,0.0000011229674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033822383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065395623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7151783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013025395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001747893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40626353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017397267","doi":"10.1163/187197310x527784","title":"Antony Anghie, Bhupinder Chimni, Karin Mickelson and Obiora Okafor (eds.), The Third World and International Order: Law Politics and Globalization, Developments in International Law, 45, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2003, 208 pp., ISBN-13: 978-90-41-12166-0.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; International law; Political science; Globalization; Politics; Public international law; Order (exchange); Economics","score_opus":0.028425644070195474,"score_gpt":0.3348973936284089,"score_spread":0.30647174955821344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017397267","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033094827,0.9681837,0.00055485545,0.014321304,0.0019411419,0.000013668969,0.00007026676,0.000022910652,0.014561211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027173716,0.97452,0.00072362274,0.0010523836,0.0015169368,0.00002046128,0.00009533669,0.00002318273,0.019330729],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992225,0.00019207448,0.00004794833,0.00008579696,0.00037284818,0.000078799014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755543,0.0014807397,0.00025197348,0.00005289121,0.00046538032,0.00019365815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016636242,0.0013321432,0.0010996242,0.0034020029,0.0016091127,0.0039670058,0.000890763,0.0018433164,0.026625603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031709536,0.00095423515,0.0003864003,0.0049954373,0.0011832663,0.007622332,0.0011879727,0.002206933,0.016467404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060915605,0.000039372364,0.00055957463,0.0033706096,0.000027129245,0.00012141926,0.0012306676,0.00014032752,0.0003104701,0.010335865,0.74458706,0.23921658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010254537,0.000016537544,0.002566044,0.0015898763,0.000031144224,0.000339231,0.00082148175,0.00008058837,0.00020162381,0.004639332,0.9896898,0.000014046559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0125764785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03284215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026625603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016567168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038818151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08907151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017780382","doi":"10.2495/sdp-v9-n1-74-89","title":"The review of sub-sahara africa gravel roads maintenance management system’s monitoring and need assessment: tanzania experience","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tanzania; Agency (philosophy); Business; Government (linguistics); Environmental planning; Monitoring and evaluation; Pavement management; Environmental resource management; Management system; Transport engineering; Engineering; Operations management; Geography; Economic growth; Environmental science; Economics","score_opus":0.01572388572961067,"score_gpt":0.30578987237292604,"score_spread":0.2900659866433154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017780382","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040100804,0.9912412,0.00014889998,0.0016821697,0.0002808164,0.000020880854,0.00018649171,0.000007911862,0.0024214282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021510568,0.9760995,0.00063788827,0.00048621552,0.00019552719,0.00001998486,0.0001864076,0.000005430508,0.00085847074],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994056,0.00013787823,0.00017079794,0.000053103187,0.00018049272,0.000052035117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960026,0.0018108237,0.00070081896,0.000047314377,0.0012727244,0.0001657518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018677242,0.00029331775,0.00039398624,0.004614136,0.0003285824,0.0014279507,0.0005556946,0.00046918998,0.0019193161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045355354,0.0003209319,0.0003163286,0.0069339084,0.00035332103,0.0010373514,0.0003310185,0.00042969786,0.00030913635],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010399295,0.00006212646,0.009022149,0.07423212,0.000161169,0.00089919165,0.0037583648,0.0005619795,0.0021425497,0.005814597,0.060525905,0.84271586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001169729,0.00018164235,0.061353125,0.043073766,0.00043223632,0.0015926105,0.0032319222,0.00018553784,0.0009093462,0.00051596906,0.888475,0.000037267087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02005862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04548605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02005862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019509734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067482935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039883733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017848436","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12342005","title":"Governance, Peace and Human Rights Violations in Africa: Addressing the Application of the Right to Self-Determination in Post-Independence Africa","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Human rights; Autonomy; Commission; Political science; Law; Corporate governance; Charter; Self-determination; Context (archaeology); International law; Judicial independence; Politics; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.037559979490837996,"score_gpt":0.34044152133600647,"score_spread":0.30288154184516847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017848436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7022235,0.013709542,0.0029885562,0.09753717,0.00025158428,0.00012904093,0.00002200177,0.0000059939343,0.18313266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934516,0.0023221096,0.0003149072,0.0016257864,0.000055284403,0.00002167588,0.0000026245318,0.0000015474891,0.0022044266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99582505,0.002455841,0.00009432885,0.000112003,0.0002874173,0.0012253264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99149984,0.0059596677,0.0014862932,0.00018672532,0.0004466847,0.00042079017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006137946,0.00026271128,0.0003089398,0.0010967922,0.009913712,0.0059598456,0.00082995766,0.004052873,0.0027021372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007197194,0.00022071575,0.00022798046,0.0013537214,0.019847047,0.0057117725,0.0061056386,0.00627817,0.00008066062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028703564,0.0000999694,0.005077427,0.00020436414,0.0000086847085,0.002810972,0.104690365,0.0005771019,0.00075204816,0.86938804,0.0018912115,0.014470955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004640912,0.00021331936,0.044144824,0.0033380776,0.000042182786,0.0022749377,0.44489375,0.0018309314,0.003042775,0.3190921,0.18098608,0.00009463489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017444445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02929125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017444445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00815304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008110124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05915469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019776754","doi":"10.1007/s00267-007-9034-x","title":"Land Claims and Comanagement of Protected Areas in South Africa: Exploring the Challenges","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Management","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nature Conservation; Geography; Forest management; Environmental planning; Agroforestry; Forestry; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.041703815487841446,"score_gpt":0.24636983803244258,"score_spread":0.20466602254460114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019776754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90134716,0.0043470124,0.00081568613,0.053862456,0.000052884017,0.00004119275,0.00011945417,0.0000032442376,0.039410982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99788314,0.00082935864,0.00008648914,0.00037637306,0.000023740096,0.00001024403,0.000008040371,0.0000011600874,0.00078134524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706775,0.0013429736,0.00010030465,0.00015778736,0.00035626497,0.0009749226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98126984,0.012630009,0.0036712612,0.00028447073,0.0010469941,0.0010974748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004742719,0.0002056114,0.00033779326,0.0022383726,0.004547411,0.00622123,0.0015364308,0.0033005944,0.0061727203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025277816,0.0002716548,0.00025841533,0.0032699443,0.0079702325,0.0064800065,0.0041731824,0.0031219504,0.00012542825],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016216721,0.00029963825,0.20827512,0.0006197303,0.00009612223,0.005491435,0.11019988,0.0038069563,0.0008515751,0.58946884,0.007432995,0.07329561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038118073,0.00016615217,0.3490789,0.0016858998,0.000090297646,0.0014459216,0.43133464,0.0068111373,0.000645672,0.16429493,0.044317305,0.00009112267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10623187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18452354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10623187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00693272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008990598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21122706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032899432","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2010.0015","title":"The Legacy of Empire: The Common Law Inheritance and Commitments to Legality in Former British Colonies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Colonialism; Indigenous; Political science; Law; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Population; Rule of law; Jurisprudence; Corporate governance; Sociology; Politics; Demography; Economics","score_opus":0.03161779720101658,"score_gpt":0.3712986535816661,"score_spread":0.3396808563806495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032899432","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99325484,0.00022807709,0.00004870939,0.0005405874,0.0000044606672,0.000002427636,0.0000044270723,7.240781e-7,0.0059158187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986494,0.00016201394,0.000027992655,0.000054902168,0.0000018112886,0.0000011806428,0.0000035642536,0.0000015950699,0.0010975784],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984037,0.0005084611,0.000059575224,0.00017144423,0.0003243381,0.00053239526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963201,0.0011411557,0.0008413937,0.00020698087,0.0006014733,0.00088891183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019966748,0.00008994337,0.00022490046,0.0008553984,0.0066014505,0.0038339037,0.0004868184,0.00064496906,0.0013607545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006949259,0.00017664961,0.000054112857,0.0013693952,0.010911896,0.0016331932,0.0028816438,0.0015423592,0.00009322688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003691601,0.000034091947,0.058680817,0.000032508404,0.000008586934,0.0011762754,0.90654314,0.00008970569,0.00082477275,0.01640423,0.0004659739,0.015702957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006860708,0.00004670035,0.26981986,0.00014291315,0.000008796252,0.00059224106,0.6953464,0.00015727646,0.00023441498,0.002146714,0.03146421,0.000033505286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45783317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7091487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45783317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007154417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00456679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91033655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037310542","doi":"10.1163/170873812x626090","title":"Provisional Registration of a Retirement Fund under Scrutiny in Swaziland","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Certificate; Complaint; Pension; Pension fund; Business; Law; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.12819428883288406,"score_gpt":0.41543919384198386,"score_spread":0.2872449050090998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037310542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.889889,0.0012201305,0.0008234276,0.034973275,0.0003411691,0.00012994738,0.00011142307,0.00004567764,0.072466016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97601175,0.00039099707,0.00048604415,0.004963504,0.00006870512,0.000047359692,0.000043469314,0.000011366782,0.017976683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99246526,0.0020823246,0.00079132814,0.0006609424,0.0014066983,0.0025934158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98777163,0.0060052946,0.0025073143,0.00093111134,0.0019380585,0.00084660086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012653804,0.00020365248,0.00042263622,0.0018341009,0.010341722,0.0061360532,0.0018139094,0.005961371,0.0048247827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022196395,0.0009644433,0.00034489954,0.0013986723,0.005497092,0.0026762777,0.006343786,0.00582278,0.00054617523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037002724,0.00029391918,0.11987914,0.0005046884,0.00009529895,0.032995757,0.14899608,0.00067417463,0.009407293,0.6035025,0.043358605,0.039922625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026532685,0.0006527579,0.21499488,0.002050779,0.0002464165,0.008148167,0.13907626,0.002250559,0.011821894,0.021681964,0.5984126,0.00039843045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13587213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21616997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13587213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009594316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012652703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27016252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037575371","doi":"10.1080/02582470709464752","title":"Mobilising ‘Community’ for Justice in District Six: Stakeholder Politics Early in the Land Restitution Process","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Historical Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Politics; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Dilemma; Political science; Economic Justice; Inclusion (mineral); Stakeholder; Public administration; State (computer science); Land administration; Law; Sociology; Geography; Social science","score_opus":0.0911174463509951,"score_gpt":0.34796807263169366,"score_spread":0.25685062628069855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037575371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6502034,0.0008178746,0.0081113195,0.090419166,0.00026006124,0.00035201618,0.000035864203,0.000050455525,0.24974987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98722863,0.00006656735,0.0005534679,0.0016214711,0.000015796346,0.00004306396,0.000005398786,0.000012905089,0.010452764],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98029274,0.012232548,0.0003328911,0.000674191,0.0010895926,0.0053779418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879318,0.0064172316,0.00061758974,0.00040763666,0.0011112444,0.003514435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013355117,0.00025137342,0.00046377495,0.0012366459,0.046762757,0.012508356,0.0021066724,0.007270318,0.009898035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01928797,0.0005059188,0.00033037976,0.0013319663,0.025011087,0.00786823,0.019587245,0.008549365,0.00066386536],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066944405,0.0001507222,0.0033452671,0.00009024812,0.000009438742,0.0024586217,0.6157465,0.0003943243,0.0014937524,0.3551492,0.0063297427,0.014765192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025929627,0.00010358021,0.004277756,0.00024945755,0.000009346744,0.00055530417,0.76923364,0.0005878749,0.0008515979,0.05965214,0.1643889,0.00006454508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035144646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0840051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046762757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013786804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019951448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10003078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037632484","doi":"10.1353/anq.2003.0045","title":"In the Eye of the Storm: The State and Non-Violence in Southern Africa (Botswana)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropological Quarterly","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Silence; Politics; State (computer science); Ethnic group; Citizenship; Institution; Law; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Political science; Gender studies; Media studies","score_opus":0.019528073002409187,"score_gpt":0.3130048656446204,"score_spread":0.2934767926422112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037632484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8021511,0.013903049,0.00030003118,0.13931915,0.0007492219,0.000067905516,0.000112604765,0.000014377454,0.04338267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9687834,0.0054918793,0.00021747145,0.012047702,0.00012466262,0.00007954824,0.000042741758,0.000025133679,0.013187525],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990822,0.0005391029,0.000014108992,0.000051676463,0.000053907945,0.00025898474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921155,0.00046282844,0.0000916586,0.00001548795,0.0000402652,0.0001782716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015143227,0.00041449073,0.00023852853,0.0009984295,0.019114306,0.006277662,0.0009138184,0.0044260873,0.004497628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024156577,0.00047495973,0.00014045762,0.0019942315,0.008456283,0.0043411413,0.003961901,0.0040491465,0.00026762465],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033661996,0.00002262815,0.0068723573,0.00015412357,0.0000069751636,0.003676309,0.9474421,0.00004122215,0.0005097254,0.017753946,0.01465991,0.008826975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007725741,0.000016444405,0.0091419825,0.00033259517,0.0000050856274,0.00044751092,0.93751264,0.000037703874,0.0000987165,0.002764925,0.049625374,0.000009333031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09402675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30965638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09402675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005312548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049568424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18695891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038134501","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100010061","title":"Administrative Discretion and the Spirit of Legality: From Theory to Practice","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Principle of legality; Discretion; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.02094910563217443,"score_gpt":0.3122005883661069,"score_spread":0.2912514827339325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038134501","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12518404,0.023554873,0.063907854,0.12338508,0.0006327092,0.00012563588,0.000092620074,0.00010968947,0.66300756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887149,0.0030876568,0.002983881,0.0014794493,0.00016160184,0.000056076795,0.000013356013,0.000027775013,0.0034753552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98732144,0.009426901,0.00037172734,0.00078886363,0.0013936181,0.0006974214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9531164,0.03963652,0.0025879827,0.0019890533,0.001520851,0.0011493575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012810487,0.0003867482,0.00055270904,0.003921089,0.004489597,0.013521524,0.0019157816,0.0041430653,0.008099298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025077567,0.00045167687,0.0004943044,0.0035014746,0.06523653,0.014495227,0.006765652,0.00555601,0.00058332045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006497822,0.000014625205,0.00041989444,0.000053346128,0.000002347881,0.000040683226,0.0118531585,0.00028447947,0.000020908223,0.98289675,0.00042094386,0.0039863293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024021138,0.000033537202,0.001156417,0.00089770847,0.0000073289466,0.00010691645,0.02382615,0.00154993,0.00014470777,0.9241227,0.04810649,0.000024092835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007376683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005099855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013521524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011953623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00979219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039212520","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2011/v14i7a2620","title":"Analysing the Onus Issue in Dismissals Emanating from the Enforcement of Unilateral Changes to Conditions of Employment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Appeal; Enforcement; Unfair dismissal; Collective bargaining; Legislature; Compliance (psychology); Law; Promotion (chess); Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.021897228404757003,"score_gpt":0.3507606884253308,"score_spread":0.3288634600205738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039212520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4508855,0.0056932764,0.010134095,0.025203846,0.0007476975,0.00023751844,0.00005697203,0.000018216093,0.5070229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9686307,0.0015401801,0.0007623528,0.0023782484,0.00042185036,0.00009170266,0.000016069556,0.000021807668,0.026137142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801728,0.006115353,0.00097137084,0.0009943238,0.005708835,0.006037324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98260814,0.011319795,0.0030706062,0.00064177864,0.001833429,0.00052627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011249016,0.0005063885,0.00084158353,0.0026475037,0.0144824395,0.014146626,0.0024189996,0.011323877,0.005144607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031848703,0.0006121592,0.00095319655,0.0024054558,0.018936789,0.0052938387,0.008492552,0.01064827,0.00071843737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006385816,0.000076138815,0.0052843005,0.00013334709,0.000016103491,0.0030477447,0.020476598,0.0008120273,0.0007020354,0.9568218,0.0016740304,0.01089196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111155605,0.000584193,0.07799168,0.0030794796,0.00019447545,0.0034164982,0.16011252,0.00503409,0.004667059,0.5041634,0.24026677,0.00037861647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02378622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037545625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02378622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012425722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008954748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09015536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040069261","doi":"10.7202/1000628ar","title":"The Unfinished Project of Roncarelli v. Duplessis: Justiciability, Discretion, and the Limits of the Rule of Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Discretion; Supreme court; Political science; Justiciability; Economic Justice; Political question; Rule of law; Politics; Power (physics); Sociology","score_opus":0.057300528873199766,"score_gpt":0.31551749798359946,"score_spread":0.2582169691103997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040069261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041148964,0.014041959,0.007884685,0.359218,0.0009641286,0.00013213734,0.00020482877,0.00009094511,0.57631433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8777327,0.004523017,0.0039203023,0.05290372,0.0006161921,0.00016196696,0.000057361052,0.000052582174,0.060032263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98996115,0.0022144383,0.00019565818,0.0011360013,0.004438703,0.0020540156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99598265,0.001960773,0.0002382121,0.0003167723,0.00082080916,0.0006808038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00575857,0.0005363439,0.0005734819,0.0014427595,0.013699919,0.011755336,0.0027232817,0.008537818,0.002061935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008080492,0.00045087613,0.00050928077,0.001162054,0.04940428,0.0058926353,0.004565041,0.014568936,0.00030347123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057400484,0.0000043097425,0.00019837817,0.000007234723,0.0000013974469,0.00006558665,0.0016422643,0.0000620302,0.00004028237,0.987805,0.007729655,0.0024380544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047406626,0.00003721031,0.0033416976,0.00040678773,0.00003140453,0.00020290611,0.004994864,0.0015358562,0.00082908274,0.6047128,0.38372165,0.00013833551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8487437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88677365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15125632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06047361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07495343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4387688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040434443","doi":"10.1163/221097312x13397499736345","title":"The Constitutional Protection of Socio-Economic Rights in Selected African Countries: A Comparative Evaluation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Realisation; Democracy; Political science; Enforcement; Dictatorship; Constitutional court; Development economics; Economic growth; International human rights law; Law; Economics; Politics; Constitution","score_opus":0.05081557316831877,"score_gpt":0.3591895841450753,"score_spread":0.30837401097675654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040434443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8658026,0.01559082,0.0011455824,0.0013196617,0.00006793519,0.0006862742,0.0007650384,0.0000073615165,0.11461473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942983,0.003995054,0.00065077416,0.00013617871,0.000028929599,0.00018811059,0.00019251804,0.0000031288332,0.0005070831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9796221,0.015320636,0.00081868976,0.0003750391,0.0025360861,0.0013272999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9351556,0.05117003,0.004783021,0.0019962266,0.006224232,0.00067098753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029621825,0.00032826365,0.00065566885,0.010718151,0.0030062546,0.0037731365,0.00079575763,0.0009376026,0.0075420784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051474024,0.00022936233,0.0005067528,0.016667549,0.0048328307,0.0033343977,0.0023725992,0.0009741431,0.00021450638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005523037,0.002628906,0.19630459,0.010487369,0.0011862331,0.0025731467,0.046377286,0.006359511,0.0017096546,0.45100683,0.00588722,0.2699562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013243661,0.007910281,0.6447921,0.010243609,0.0018065944,0.001675613,0.15547991,0.0024155453,0.00435257,0.019801455,0.15005448,0.00014351452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008500963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014449625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029621825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005475851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028331922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15665704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043287644","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.05.007","title":"Land restitution and communal property associations: The Elandskloof case","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Land tenure; Legitimacy; Public administration; Sanctions; Business; Law; Political science; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.04251931802782195,"score_gpt":0.34582263592246687,"score_spread":0.30330331789464493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043287644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7674116,0.0012855296,0.0009733067,0.028828425,0.00008585736,0.000087887456,0.000047413894,0.000012198445,0.20126776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98564875,0.00032195123,0.000113704264,0.0020160023,0.000032511085,0.000043213902,0.0000071505488,0.0000049195883,0.011811783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.993952,0.0012124047,0.00009171946,0.0002454299,0.0003113165,0.004187144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957806,0.0025666994,0.00052117003,0.00019221316,0.00020274475,0.0007366661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004322426,0.00040087602,0.0007052449,0.0012210691,0.023492536,0.009231225,0.0018651356,0.010743679,0.007836995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007846165,0.000594191,0.0004631335,0.001988744,0.0171602,0.00505644,0.008060333,0.008829443,0.0003537688],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021529885,0.0002834058,0.017173799,0.000083871644,0.000047535985,0.014847519,0.047675017,0.0012604176,0.00067910476,0.89987504,0.0067707323,0.011088302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006725304,0.00043180495,0.05689416,0.0015623587,0.00044854154,0.009652818,0.35946643,0.00499939,0.0033302386,0.27250913,0.28972036,0.0003122605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17258458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30949074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17258458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011923334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010210977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3431601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046066281","doi":"10.1002/iir.92","title":"The abuse of the process of the court in friendly sequestration proceedings in South Africa","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Citation; Law; Library science; Process (computing); Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03550360185464811,"score_gpt":0.3291719711877474,"score_spread":0.29366836933309926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046066281","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29453427,0.03366065,0.004518291,0.34126547,0.0023500593,0.00043258845,0.000112675654,0.0000611523,0.32306492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9335975,0.005602952,0.0010266067,0.042953156,0.0006412046,0.00014799906,0.000015422738,0.000047133977,0.015968047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96715266,0.015458237,0.002492167,0.0019016304,0.005242804,0.0077524837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8981723,0.083046995,0.006632538,0.0023026285,0.007231884,0.002613612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05038833,0.00041932263,0.00082445267,0.0036075448,0.020764947,0.0227141,0.0025827878,0.022396462,0.0042412346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.106452145,0.0011136868,0.00061867567,0.003944682,0.01623763,0.008451443,0.0080932975,0.021784432,0.00038178367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112944304,0.00004576184,0.0022863394,0.00044672555,0.00006628935,0.004639108,0.062843956,0.00057450315,0.0011038958,0.8785483,0.02473001,0.024602188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020206594,0.00030716235,0.024553357,0.005598806,0.0004905277,0.0034885895,0.07456604,0.0015428914,0.006651363,0.16111551,0.7210838,0.00039992773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05356069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11628588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05356069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014116526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030605206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2664821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052087121","doi":"10.7202/042742ar","title":"L'aide sociale et le prêt, les droits extrapatrimoniaux et l'assurance-chômage","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Collège de Maisonneuve","funders":"","keywords":"Loan; Interpretation (philosophy); Welfare; Damages; Social Welfare; Political science; Scope (computer science); Section (typography); Unemployment; Social Security Act; Law; Social assistance; Sociology; Law and economics; Economics; Business; Economic growth; Social security; Finance","score_opus":0.01653360318679621,"score_gpt":0.28965251216867655,"score_spread":0.27311890898188035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052087121","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18227187,0.09035188,0.003117841,0.13472015,0.00075694814,0.000037692775,0.00011010217,0.000023449395,0.58861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94978505,0.016760536,0.0004419078,0.0021972712,0.00035943108,0.000024773759,0.000015153358,0.000007588563,0.030408248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852645,0.0006602339,0.00004441544,0.00008160498,0.00029492786,0.00039228782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768245,0.001427729,0.00038259552,0.00007895757,0.00018409887,0.00024413013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014286395,0.00027089726,0.00017283915,0.0011459711,0.0036300817,0.0039883195,0.0004023949,0.0016283456,0.006620603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004028328,0.000101348596,0.0001359129,0.001233996,0.010563604,0.0026380068,0.0026448837,0.0020873663,0.0003702738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019589443,0.0000127953,0.0017695058,0.000120655815,0.0000035360692,0.00031973034,0.014560285,0.00016782086,0.00021072791,0.9592132,0.0032325883,0.020369563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018297698,0.000076812,0.015167822,0.0011074528,0.000012247039,0.0007866944,0.03167403,0.00022239688,0.00045146683,0.120078556,0.83037436,0.000029979377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029194072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0440275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029194072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046018227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005748592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05804825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058095284","doi":"10.1163/15692108-12341243","title":"Land and Justice in South Africa: Exploring the Ambiguous Role of the State in the Land Claims Process","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African and Asian Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; State (computer science); Land reform; Land law; Land tenure; Politics; Land grabbing; Government (linguistics); Political science; Economic Justice; Commodity; Rurality; Political economy; Economic growth; Sociology; Law; Rural area; Agriculture; Economics; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.05593421277439234,"score_gpt":0.31190536240415956,"score_spread":0.2559711496297672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058095284","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8480249,0.003447137,0.0015521166,0.029390248,0.000056258476,0.00004200806,0.000019344847,0.0000053706713,0.117462575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986199,0.00032762095,0.00007899189,0.00020212516,0.000008314433,0.000007106803,0.0000013496834,0.0000017565827,0.00075285655],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99594325,0.002797781,0.000087485154,0.00016732884,0.00031116174,0.00069300376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98434997,0.013364196,0.0011311999,0.00029115935,0.0004766523,0.00038675615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073661213,0.00022304284,0.000344387,0.0027353405,0.01581482,0.0102291815,0.0008049253,0.0028202878,0.0042558922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010424968,0.0002443693,0.00022121867,0.00304351,0.04756773,0.008219292,0.008422338,0.003457589,0.00014697404],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027192253,0.000043606364,0.0035306069,0.00014180783,0.000008134797,0.0013372313,0.5052941,0.00020651284,0.00049989764,0.4813608,0.0005043588,0.007045762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013741785,0.000042163058,0.01194255,0.00062965014,0.000016830685,0.0002582815,0.82308525,0.0006062191,0.0005420345,0.1249742,0.037863858,0.000025277854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015516455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023358911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01581482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010147262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065420326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073623836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059962459","doi":"10.1353/cch.0.0030","title":"A Common Hunger: Land Rights in Canada and South Africa (review)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Colonialism and Colonial History","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Oppression; Dignity; Politics; Indigenous rights; Redress; Human rights; Government (linguistics); Pastoralism; Political science; Geography; Ethnology; History; Livestock; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.017780668623065134,"score_gpt":0.24214815238436516,"score_spread":0.22436748376130003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059962459","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010130002,0.99899155,0.0000039072943,0.00047744144,0.00009300317,0.000003881945,0.000030458072,0.0000010154636,0.0002973352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013627947,0.99793243,0.000020850397,0.00035692385,0.0000491232,0.0000057332195,0.00004067329,8.327442e-7,0.00023073202],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993513,0.000088059634,0.000094232324,0.000057525,0.00029001498,0.000118846794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752015,0.00078793167,0.00043960122,0.000032440246,0.0009360387,0.00028373182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000981179,0.00080438936,0.002021983,0.004483951,0.0011387895,0.0034618424,0.0010515131,0.001384192,0.0061708135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041793855,0.00038570125,0.00080165983,0.015011815,0.0015840642,0.002114039,0.0010936898,0.0017219466,0.0004061427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014704722,0.00004599663,0.0016014344,0.1499428,0.00045695668,0.00026342864,0.0009976664,0.00022225818,0.00021902806,0.002296419,0.18218333,0.66162366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007305591,0.00007368776,0.023451809,0.15796475,0.0010225796,0.0010433894,0.002970594,0.00006984113,0.00011131583,0.00071967376,0.8124183,0.0000810145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55291253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76534677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44708747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010023309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044275705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8994409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061241455","doi":"10.1002/iir.139","title":"New legislative measures in South Africa aimed at combating over‐indebtedness—are the new proposals sufficient under the constitution and law in general?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Legislature; Constitution; Debt; Law; Bill of rights; State (computer science); Order (exchange); Constitutionalism; Consumer protection; Constitutional review; Economics; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Finance; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.046522426008477946,"score_gpt":0.33187570296776514,"score_spread":0.2853532769592872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061241455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32774544,0.08764303,0.003930215,0.26543072,0.0028483106,0.0006640934,0.0001524883,0.000058812162,0.3115269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9289591,0.026582181,0.0032977134,0.019926088,0.00073724944,0.0002527239,0.000055127563,0.000015790545,0.020174071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99435,0.002759067,0.00042642627,0.00032320456,0.0012592664,0.0008820039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876637,0.007509915,0.0023648494,0.0005462415,0.0014186429,0.0004965893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014230638,0.00025505578,0.0004018013,0.0022398587,0.0023620212,0.004773652,0.0009653024,0.0034464232,0.004669812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021876823,0.000366053,0.0003584197,0.0018089983,0.0062392927,0.0035313147,0.0018373085,0.0034313041,0.00029925804],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010834178,0.00015486038,0.0057351943,0.0016284352,0.00004039439,0.0015202016,0.01665526,0.0010309452,0.0044576465,0.897192,0.01185226,0.059624452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022444749,0.00052621996,0.042988032,0.004240235,0.00017539418,0.0012036442,0.01958521,0.00083088636,0.004820734,0.057903267,0.86737883,0.00012304386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010476261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016153296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014230638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005223103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010890722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075259686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064755567","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12342042","title":"Competing Competences in Adjudication: Reviewing the Relationship between the ECOWAS Court and National Courts","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Complementarity (molecular biology); Economic Justice; Political science; Institution; Law; International law; Public administration","score_opus":0.11394445736055644,"score_gpt":0.3808152849352499,"score_spread":0.2668708275746935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064755567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.404027,0.2201537,0.00558317,0.06568774,0.00052866794,0.00014665093,0.00007449975,0.000010210949,0.3037884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9717281,0.025167823,0.00074112293,0.0011375361,0.00015342796,0.000031684693,0.000015583168,0.0000056116255,0.0010193207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9788296,0.015049194,0.0012083132,0.00075826043,0.0023870352,0.0017676338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7914117,0.18023887,0.011591247,0.0011734263,0.013106675,0.0024780885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025419775,0.00017648596,0.0006483108,0.0053013014,0.0051341527,0.008906798,0.0016361114,0.0025236497,0.0038026983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.089807495,0.00042030629,0.0003954242,0.006853449,0.015853476,0.009588441,0.0038398525,0.0036004079,0.00025906635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008914627,0.00014563843,0.061221868,0.0017474229,0.0000793571,0.0017128575,0.05407588,0.0008351109,0.00019169661,0.79033786,0.0028631536,0.08670007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006386048,0.00028282206,0.21419153,0.019864492,0.00037484884,0.002799286,0.3770771,0.0037147875,0.00073044666,0.18773425,0.19302474,0.00014183919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04959562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11655792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04959562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011341036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017291982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13443422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067271657","doi":"10.4000/chs.850","title":"« It's a Mystery » : the Royal Prerogative of Mercy in England, Canada and South Africa","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Crime Histoire et Sociétés","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Prerogative; Meaning (existential); Deliberation; Law; Lottery; Sociology; History; Political science; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04635659208524007,"score_gpt":0.33230454601338405,"score_spread":0.285947953928144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067271657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7134834,0.028294845,0.00042312354,0.11601334,0.0005061074,0.000059899266,0.000115578274,0.00001541539,0.14108835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97791916,0.003800226,0.00013835696,0.0029602738,0.00004287759,0.000012936893,0.000014475651,0.0000146522925,0.015097043],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724257,0.00039102978,0.00005598735,0.00014835589,0.00048577038,0.0016762954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966394,0.001036451,0.00037709958,0.00008664221,0.0008630167,0.0009974588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013670282,0.00029903275,0.00035436,0.0019981356,0.034122262,0.0058479835,0.0010731069,0.002287122,0.003339866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069130315,0.0003031479,0.00015643174,0.002416544,0.020272095,0.0024660996,0.0036395588,0.0042899675,0.00014942721],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009117253,0.000022966275,0.01585495,0.00021599408,0.000017381975,0.002865168,0.6852516,0.00014485787,0.0006724735,0.24514444,0.017384397,0.032334667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028511238,0.00003124683,0.088084854,0.0007969723,0.00003122669,0.00093506643,0.54718596,0.00013747095,0.00053432706,0.011527028,0.3505653,0.00014206786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98417956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99466103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076269194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.076269194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08412092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5533743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070403052","doi":"10.1163/221097312x13397499736589","title":"Protecting Human Rights amidst Poverty and Inequality: The South African Post-apartheid Experience on the Right of Access to Housing","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Poverty; Democracy; State (computer science); Political science; Constitution; Politics; Development economics; Economic growth; International human rights law; Population; Fundamental rights; Inequality; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.10854540699747733,"score_gpt":0.3684019043684768,"score_spread":0.2598564973709995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070403052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59929115,0.01118713,0.001437218,0.1814121,0.00059672975,0.00008361289,0.000030877112,0.000009827339,0.20595132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98791844,0.0021240662,0.0002139044,0.002280057,0.00006498443,0.00002322693,0.0000030556494,0.0000052890314,0.0073670303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955284,0.0025361155,0.00012313701,0.00014162903,0.0003674189,0.0013032935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99637586,0.0024729741,0.00036564708,0.00014986712,0.00020501841,0.00043065418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007857773,0.00034474488,0.00044266577,0.0009377675,0.022567123,0.0061877477,0.0006347576,0.003941867,0.0048447936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053631207,0.00034904806,0.00024659326,0.0012891215,0.036745973,0.0064339126,0.010297302,0.0068906266,0.00018401023],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033558666,0.000048114973,0.0009939384,0.00013971582,0.0000054075063,0.0019863597,0.4099123,0.00012843244,0.00075223355,0.57335114,0.0031801437,0.009468659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036837555,0.00013850577,0.00879993,0.0011228145,0.000017055967,0.0012979333,0.5217589,0.00029781915,0.00095564337,0.1176212,0.3478921,0.000061273466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0241072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040404182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0241072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076974314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007774924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055849075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074741131","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2003.tb00910.x","title":"Governing the multicultural city‐region","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Ontario; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Immigration; Multiculturalism; Recreation; Settlement (finance); Legislature; Local government; Government (linguistics); Business; Finance","score_opus":0.04796019242221597,"score_gpt":0.2990276706229065,"score_spread":0.25106747820069053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074741131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6210472,0.0035247987,0.0037629134,0.027552538,0.00044920354,0.00019908143,0.00013982732,0.00008208899,0.34324238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94989467,0.0004675451,0.0007589425,0.002039931,0.000047541875,0.0000542689,0.000043369644,0.000021192707,0.046672598],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663997,0.00095261197,0.0001045488,0.0004639858,0.00043793223,0.0014009714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972248,0.00036874536,0.00034476904,0.0002490209,0.00060931605,0.0012033312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004264349,0.00027870666,0.0001940338,0.00060961803,0.015721673,0.00784951,0.0013136519,0.0012778649,0.0070401323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002416268,0.00030650888,0.0002272071,0.00095926924,0.0124401655,0.0015882802,0.01351683,0.0018623094,0.0005820639],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006632668,0.000058173315,0.073338106,0.00023596777,0.000044807286,0.0019373684,0.48452675,0.00053279434,0.0023993107,0.34817305,0.030133309,0.058554005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015371166,0.000042223513,0.037972752,0.00022886739,0.000026647616,0.00045853716,0.17163976,0.0002774756,0.000610057,0.008187154,0.78049856,0.000042619657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37676054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5767086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98415613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015843889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030840889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74913514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076253832","doi":"10.1002/(sici)1099-1107(200021)9:1<65::aid-iir61>3.0.co;2-0","title":"A perspective on the doctrine of voidable dispositions in South African insolvency law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Insolvency; Perspective (graphical); Law; Citation; Political science; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.03038050590296959,"score_gpt":0.355158790273849,"score_spread":0.3247782843708794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076253832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030383456,0.32181132,0.0065313266,0.31379938,0.0030181382,0.00012230323,0.000104987936,0.000024599452,0.32420444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7231494,0.17766787,0.003346946,0.060457107,0.0046985685,0.00027144476,0.000056584333,0.0000381776,0.0303139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956328,0.0019977354,0.00021294173,0.00030139426,0.0008498828,0.0010051113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99061626,0.0074313604,0.0006238782,0.0002311415,0.0008625825,0.00023478817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010690852,0.0005480839,0.00092554756,0.005835782,0.007760907,0.014312652,0.001509716,0.011519769,0.0041129477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016116116,0.00050918,0.0007538649,0.0066682994,0.024278507,0.008191442,0.00322744,0.012739081,0.0003266014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005727195,0.000006338019,0.00012230893,0.00012716139,0.0000045824554,0.00017150662,0.0020868275,0.00014886749,0.00008688019,0.9871753,0.005080258,0.0049843304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027669035,0.000044828947,0.0026208085,0.003014988,0.00004957202,0.00041413665,0.0066843526,0.00042930746,0.00044811273,0.5769617,0.40926194,0.000042515185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026269624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034623403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026269624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008115108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016866433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058879554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076287430","doi":"10.7202/043335ar","title":"Secret professionnel et signalement de situations de compromission chez l'enfant : un dilemme à résoudre","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.021278968814574632,"score_gpt":0.30023262674390994,"score_spread":0.2789536579293353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076287430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5750608,0.00927843,0.009820351,0.17434801,0.0010836095,0.00016317684,0.00009447634,0.000087763336,0.2300634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98484683,0.0014102065,0.0010238733,0.0024022316,0.0000880942,0.000033093285,0.000009597669,0.000011841304,0.010174282],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99561936,0.002071204,0.00019645039,0.0002752033,0.00092914153,0.0009086902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904405,0.004297114,0.0025389353,0.00037986093,0.0009756267,0.0013679303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053247046,0.0003126048,0.00028464466,0.0011253448,0.007544266,0.005176605,0.00082312373,0.003428074,0.007819055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018487457,0.00023963979,0.00023270989,0.0005762033,0.01491767,0.0050917463,0.005347487,0.0038659335,0.00042015384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099072044,0.00008358925,0.02627693,0.00038563684,0.000017718294,0.0045943456,0.61119765,0.00016295195,0.0018986362,0.27804083,0.009158753,0.068083905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028063345,0.00017220253,0.047424488,0.0017308019,0.000038738977,0.006692765,0.6745132,0.00036258425,0.0019904012,0.042445328,0.22448081,0.0001206226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027237501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037114974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027237501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060106795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012189866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054157913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076433970","doi":"10.1002/iir.86","title":"Reform of South African insolvency law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Insolvency; Law; Political science; History; Art history","score_opus":0.048313854475952885,"score_gpt":0.36451579135873374,"score_spread":0.31620193688278087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076433970","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09811693,0.2459607,0.0016721496,0.3262405,0.004318669,0.000309133,0.00023573243,0.000044267257,0.3231019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7470968,0.13713944,0.0018267058,0.06821063,0.0024926316,0.0002906014,0.00014430386,0.000050013106,0.042748883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99472934,0.0019170267,0.0003732873,0.00028622954,0.0011955622,0.0014986201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923273,0.0041612736,0.0009759121,0.00030551484,0.0018543116,0.00037569136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010015872,0.0004889195,0.00064571877,0.005008162,0.0059186304,0.010599558,0.0010491553,0.006846676,0.004429503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022862831,0.00043792409,0.00046044,0.0049250685,0.0061521344,0.0038411643,0.0031692178,0.006720958,0.00040483775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074572585,0.00006185457,0.0019757291,0.0016635039,0.00006619656,0.0012594439,0.011259669,0.0007406236,0.0011397426,0.85304886,0.05816979,0.070539996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074433825,0.00007068523,0.012728458,0.0043951813,0.00014472526,0.0005192626,0.006717057,0.0004057956,0.0011440306,0.06703138,0.90672547,0.000043448264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02900159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049662333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02900159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010281554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032569926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07459819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077618305","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12342020","title":"The Lesotho Constitution and Doctrine of Separation of Powers: Reflections on the Judicial Attitude","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Separation of powers; Doctrine; Law; Democracy; Political science; Government (linguistics); Politics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07608136454369334,"score_gpt":0.41773993300588264,"score_spread":0.3416585684621893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077618305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09902596,0.013701887,0.006350791,0.23693809,0.0011787987,0.00008155641,0.00009038292,0.000024309213,0.64260817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9637632,0.0021051073,0.0014929416,0.017131144,0.0005982857,0.00006293571,0.000014274,0.000019826864,0.014812338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935813,0.0033763319,0.00030058392,0.0005594896,0.0012215499,0.0009607452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936283,0.0044073216,0.000500958,0.00028196067,0.00090428995,0.0002771602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069796876,0.0002284705,0.0003999296,0.0018106953,0.010174243,0.009601591,0.001135318,0.0054685483,0.002265848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009170528,0.0003261188,0.00027617186,0.0014940033,0.045679912,0.004510889,0.004058389,0.009473646,0.00017595466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034927239,0.000003871361,0.000116192794,0.000012219648,9.921148e-7,0.0001000979,0.0033562605,0.000045504577,0.000057903275,0.99451077,0.00086635904,0.000926289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072236246,0.00003544175,0.0028472845,0.0007057754,0.000022589118,0.00037566578,0.017972449,0.0010779928,0.0006820487,0.6788519,0.29727668,0.00008002369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04220288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04730812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04220288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010855717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008944787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08391446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079586111","doi":"10.1590/s0104-026x2006000200005","title":"Violência doméstica e Juizados Especiais Criminais: análise a partir do feminismo e do garantismo","year":2006,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Estudos Feministas","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Gender studies; Feminism; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030021622989282442,"score_gpt":0.32021316021112695,"score_spread":0.2901915372218445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079586111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95336694,0.0036085164,0.00031887423,0.0030711552,0.000052088504,0.000032745676,0.0001574053,0.0000035683483,0.039388765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99361515,0.0022486234,0.000097110336,0.00018882491,0.000029998922,0.00002150963,0.00003205702,0.0000046205028,0.0037621248],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981646,0.00078634825,0.00008103356,0.00014196873,0.00033322477,0.0004929042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925948,0.0041267276,0.002253854,0.000261021,0.00040223706,0.00036146207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020993843,0.00026831139,0.00041825807,0.0037064778,0.0038287225,0.003796502,0.00064420665,0.00097626855,0.0069723446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009022598,0.0001944659,0.00023773682,0.0042958315,0.006730913,0.0031701594,0.0044434685,0.001307868,0.00025259316],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006456557,0.00007614651,0.18934752,0.00048733002,0.000041399984,0.0018907103,0.70175433,0.00011433301,0.0006986407,0.059372235,0.002367243,0.04378547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023007092,0.000060235026,0.29530954,0.0005946662,0.000026144111,0.0010682872,0.6566653,0.000109699424,0.00029968127,0.0028263782,0.04301736,0.000020327956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024005596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05351475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024005596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00268472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019540417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047731757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083274652","doi":"10.4314/aa.v8i1.23104","title":"The Changing Family Structure and Legal Lag in Lesotho: Implications for the Future","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Anthropologist","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Population; Law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Proclamation; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Geography; Demography; Politics","score_opus":0.02536751942573162,"score_gpt":0.3520677738474582,"score_spread":0.32670025442172657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083274652","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28645176,0.04328171,0.00040896152,0.62384564,0.0010043877,0.000052492294,0.00023340022,0.000019204354,0.044702485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94210863,0.029116785,0.0005168725,0.014759708,0.00047473155,0.00006425865,0.000076490534,0.000014074794,0.012868441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905974,0.00024249022,0.000029021488,0.000060694343,0.00010919066,0.0004988145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814105,0.0003538467,0.00031618285,0.00003531561,0.00027393995,0.0008797145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011752341,0.00016697073,0.00025819737,0.0008398304,0.008456127,0.0042700465,0.0010585397,0.0021990456,0.011583394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003188575,0.00018575139,0.00020221001,0.0016080468,0.010220919,0.005928253,0.0029163223,0.0027991615,0.00027704504],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000179083,0.0003619086,0.05541988,0.0011097356,0.000028595925,0.014967835,0.3268174,0.00055359554,0.0015768125,0.36044204,0.042361673,0.19618142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003965736,0.00013390258,0.1370643,0.0016187162,0.000025098583,0.0031988516,0.48089823,0.00040374848,0.00029534957,0.052036237,0.32418314,0.00010275796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15802252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25462282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15802252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010667512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014512517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31420547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085159431","doi":"10.1080/714003705","title":"Human Rights in Foreign Policy: Lessons for South Africa from Canadian Experience?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Multilateralism; Hypocrisy; Diplomacy; Political science; Foreign policy; International human rights law; Constructive; Right to property; Government (linguistics); Linguistic rights; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.051973596459282186,"score_gpt":0.37092084931500063,"score_spread":0.31894725285571845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085159431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4523216,0.026278384,0.00079850876,0.18147534,0.00072180165,0.00017059776,0.000373589,0.00004236046,0.3378179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93139935,0.019067975,0.00093789125,0.008932649,0.00005066388,0.00006323703,0.000104126295,0.000042372092,0.03940176],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970906,0.0006205984,0.00008081995,0.00014532726,0.00038904743,0.0016735522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977023,0.0007900045,0.00012730526,0.000062370804,0.00062790303,0.00069018675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025822585,0.00061790197,0.00057719735,0.0016743881,0.027893482,0.008124717,0.0009748218,0.0023443766,0.011028451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005447727,0.0002868861,0.00037050367,0.0043187235,0.008511178,0.0036766431,0.004428071,0.003932717,0.00047267755],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014057462,0.000098768316,0.012251407,0.00082984165,0.00002630991,0.0038934108,0.6922326,0.00040492805,0.0010527201,0.17160024,0.036617465,0.08085174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021180856,0.000029558989,0.010566036,0.00095442345,0.000024226098,0.0006196764,0.6384481,0.00013687895,0.0003562135,0.0053345547,0.34343538,0.000073731026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9839153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9935702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088850886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.088850886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12647429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6446613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088114035","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2009/v12i2a2728","title":"Die Impak en Grondwetlikheid van die Reg om te Staak met Betrekking tot Noodsaaklike Dienste – 'n Vergelykende Studie","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Constitution; Political science; Position (finance); Law; Business","score_opus":0.018726474126044543,"score_gpt":0.3248098539873243,"score_spread":0.30608337986127976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088114035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2616596,0.28521752,0.010616714,0.061750606,0.0062469696,0.0013264156,0.002914903,0.0000590744,0.37020814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71026325,0.16569966,0.007082671,0.014151082,0.001270361,0.0022011572,0.0021096938,0.00018572043,0.09703644],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98872316,0.006040364,0.0008797202,0.0008285418,0.0027740055,0.0007542758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98438406,0.011092627,0.0015878773,0.0009547443,0.0015112928,0.00046942243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011523152,0.00044156975,0.00080315355,0.001587937,0.002601256,0.011536961,0.0012307896,0.0012865842,0.02524321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033412695,0.00050564785,0.0006870509,0.0021645112,0.002699792,0.009331637,0.0044983393,0.002007844,0.0040281215],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004986419,0.0008815469,0.036351904,0.01619483,0.00093462114,0.0006200422,0.13411978,0.0008202835,0.001086209,0.27021965,0.08820321,0.45006922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004499577,0.00023828902,0.029242197,0.019226989,0.00030180323,0.00037948476,0.09241975,0.00020819844,0.0009157194,0.028699456,0.82825595,0.000067142035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0101624215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023908745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02524321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036595215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009476439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08444697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089950863","doi":"10.1177/0021934707306569","title":"<i>Baker</i> Revisited 2007","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Black Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Supreme court; Duty; Law; Racism; Immigration; Politics; Restitution; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04994834571938465,"score_gpt":0.39739064332305907,"score_spread":0.3474422976036744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089950863","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014102136,0.008134598,0.0006806707,0.7360178,0.00539121,0.00009106574,0.00030148763,0.00009182129,0.23518917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10723321,0.0029215005,0.0010486745,0.7040868,0.001285722,0.000109585475,0.0000762498,0.0000867167,0.18315165],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944326,0.00057611463,0.000121444245,0.0006173968,0.0019088514,0.0023436053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972319,0.0007303926,0.00014523535,0.00009044102,0.001234096,0.00056796387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00391466,0.00053812534,0.0004823198,0.0012689552,0.0355294,0.013945708,0.002891571,0.025021285,0.008547207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010831938,0.0008019682,0.00074984756,0.0018275132,0.013322208,0.0041601653,0.0033305332,0.025341991,0.0013949323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021294265,0.000014199426,0.00060524215,0.000052724623,0.000007683406,0.00042421196,0.00716344,0.000058882826,0.00021559733,0.38610822,0.5970445,0.0082840435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013274087,0.000011377785,0.0012846952,0.00024343279,0.00001950833,0.0001361968,0.0074673295,0.00009882754,0.00031946314,0.011670458,0.97867155,0.00006380847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9030248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95116967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9030248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059198525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09025522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4295174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094771148","doi":"10.1080/13218711003739516","title":"Families Impacted by the Criminal Justice System on the Frontier: A New Model Required","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychiatry Psychology and Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Magistrate; Economic Justice; Frontier; Criminal justice; Imprisonment; Criminology; Domestic violence; Sociology; Law; Political science; History; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.02688341621342481,"score_gpt":0.3334904379082711,"score_spread":0.30660702169484627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094771148","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07166391,0.0033139545,0.031353325,0.4790789,0.0019216579,0.00020673449,0.00016763022,0.00015129721,0.41214252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9525136,0.0020713133,0.010165948,0.0138382595,0.0006755514,0.00030441326,0.00007270317,0.000054717126,0.020303642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99490154,0.0027935621,0.000096446434,0.00054690463,0.00066899735,0.0009925306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945799,0.0022856232,0.00034139236,0.0004122672,0.0010205798,0.0013602613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065969275,0.00067628844,0.0005311587,0.002508233,0.010191049,0.013181244,0.0034396711,0.005563611,0.014482929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007564458,0.00034759592,0.00066104,0.0013934798,0.02874931,0.02020424,0.00878862,0.0067569003,0.00097439607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012058877,0.000058578593,0.0011425002,0.000027737307,0.000004012519,0.00030518998,0.006720122,0.00064969814,0.00002523031,0.9778425,0.0069669937,0.0062453537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029003833,0.000094427895,0.0015303754,0.00037107067,0.000013859584,0.00045967955,0.047424197,0.007942372,0.00006401833,0.85985464,0.08216727,0.000049008173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024962023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029995933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024962023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01215492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017409492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088190556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094877933","doi":"10.1007/s12142-005-1017-9","title":"Dignity, discrimination, and context: New directions in South African and Canadian human rights law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Human rights; Law; Political science; Legislature; Plaintiff; Substantive rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.042610148228079146,"score_gpt":0.3346408859805842,"score_spread":0.2920307377525051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094877933","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012437816,0.50534374,0.0012872954,0.38530198,0.0028213786,0.00006589892,0.00011245634,0.000019770167,0.092609726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3860158,0.45965943,0.0053198957,0.11794539,0.0030831508,0.00016504529,0.00009558221,0.000063750835,0.027651967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892882,0.0033867916,0.0005648683,0.0007938872,0.003693785,0.0022725062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733219,0.016719336,0.0006433064,0.00049613253,0.007222381,0.0015970271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022022162,0.0006512375,0.001291356,0.007402106,0.01572194,0.019616649,0.0030345297,0.011646235,0.008318827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028388672,0.00051936746,0.0007008294,0.010709008,0.040636152,0.012820598,0.0040448895,0.011833996,0.00026836435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037742793,0.000044031636,0.0012430524,0.0013679903,0.000032373027,0.00028303603,0.016834328,0.00023438221,0.00031993687,0.83012515,0.050822962,0.098655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040616425,0.0000402892,0.0078067095,0.009492361,0.00011921028,0.00021971336,0.039771397,0.0002702969,0.0003605669,0.26410666,0.6776003,0.0001718787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86163247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9479152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13836753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07224668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19927105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52418876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096974502","doi":"10.1080/0042098042000226957","title":"Privatising Cape Town: From Apartheid to Neo-liberalism in the Mother City","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Urban Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegemony; Ideology; Dominance (genetics); Liberalism; Politics; Sociology; Cape; Urban politics; Government (linguistics); Political economy; Autonomy; Public administration; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07695537889438255,"score_gpt":0.3621353132828267,"score_spread":0.2851799343884442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096974502","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9077642,0.0031578995,0.0005527925,0.029521639,0.000093653936,0.000044462944,0.000030340358,0.0000070478313,0.058827996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99352235,0.0007563087,0.00011922869,0.00041424023,0.000013187014,0.000016667833,0.000004203218,0.0000041290023,0.0051498148],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984144,0.00084364007,0.00003262468,0.00010751201,0.00016122265,0.0004405563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981388,0.0010121693,0.00032528714,0.0000990884,0.00011254506,0.0003120967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018092273,0.00024510527,0.00024597708,0.0008477612,0.012753051,0.0059987516,0.0006099255,0.001116981,0.004201332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004872464,0.00030959852,0.00011772124,0.0013188198,0.018013151,0.0035112097,0.0039446256,0.0024474664,0.00014545077],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006472101,0.00003957263,0.00517978,0.00017126814,0.000008636564,0.004608242,0.6634512,0.0002733495,0.00096378906,0.3068104,0.004713361,0.0137156015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032768443,0.000062808605,0.023009919,0.00066067843,0.00001941303,0.00067317166,0.7191484,0.00041277742,0.00088304735,0.02705224,0.22799426,0.00005050381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13340704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22582828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13340704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018396936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00935612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26526105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098264719","doi":"10.1002/iir.1212","title":"Treatment of a Debtor's Home in Insolvency: Comparative Perspectives and Potential Developments in South Africa","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Insolvency; Creditor; Statutory law; Estate; Bankruptcy; Business; Law; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Economics; Debt; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.05246384574752867,"score_gpt":0.3532636275689038,"score_spread":0.3007997818213751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098264719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5684492,0.21666585,0.0006062375,0.021818545,0.0003757425,0.00007814066,0.00014987325,0.0000049298847,0.19185144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9372535,0.058367744,0.00021338896,0.00048443896,0.00009178445,0.000021820124,0.000025128442,0.0000030542312,0.0035392726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993868,0.0002934748,0.000032763422,0.000021949758,0.00005486982,0.00021008452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903643,0.00050601544,0.00019493066,0.000023553084,0.00012641266,0.00011269075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010836476,0.00024923348,0.0003358824,0.0028430922,0.0024250227,0.0030332014,0.00067045435,0.0008880075,0.00745035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022959732,0.00014390128,0.00017735407,0.0058866055,0.0048777917,0.0025541831,0.002197482,0.0012181527,0.00014919811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002505243,0.00021293708,0.014296835,0.004642337,0.000048232607,0.010379053,0.21915823,0.0007256551,0.001715521,0.59513,0.0049480353,0.14849266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042071606,0.00024839005,0.098995514,0.009161997,0.00009782828,0.0040687956,0.56054443,0.00039233247,0.0011403537,0.032175336,0.29308197,0.000050957697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024667785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0586952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024667785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065772193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003976464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049048424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098509544","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.47.2.427","title":"Crime and Crime Prevention in South Africa: 10 Years After","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Law enforcement; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Politics; Political science; Crime prevention; Law; Criminology; Economic Justice; Criminal law; Civil society; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.07994079659052933,"score_gpt":0.32064880576170973,"score_spread":0.2407080091711804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098509544","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098676644,0.36421388,0.00031014704,0.5106378,0.006436096,0.000087487584,0.00013591148,0.000014266587,0.01948784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5757086,0.34417439,0.0012964992,0.056624923,0.0040898044,0.00018589274,0.00020093254,0.00003018622,0.017688818],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784744,0.0006845398,0.00013973888,0.00015165708,0.00028592497,0.00089069526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975157,0.0005943021,0.00033713088,0.00009415509,0.000642579,0.0008161552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041045854,0.00061020226,0.00048201557,0.0016799466,0.0032461362,0.004226262,0.0006439077,0.003245507,0.0035117103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00551305,0.00029328698,0.0005684778,0.0022994669,0.004460217,0.005160524,0.0046966667,0.005608994,0.00030194453],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042681082,0.0010849538,0.03861958,0.007112726,0.00013085174,0.0068461513,0.117305994,0.0004594746,0.002579321,0.1647626,0.08379018,0.5768814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007285119,0.00035032572,0.108220324,0.005850482,0.00007862629,0.0015061965,0.067740604,0.00014032808,0.0006980254,0.009591202,0.80567366,0.000077398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07224529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11948302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07224529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009504513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026356699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14364958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098776700","doi":"10.1108/10222529201000011","title":"Applying the Canadian “reasonable expectation of profit” test to a section 80M(1)(d) reportable arrangement","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Meditari Accountancy Research","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Section (typography); Profit (economics); Actuarial science; Indigenous; Engineering; Economics; Business; Finance; Microeconomics; Advertising","score_opus":0.07524187460895183,"score_gpt":0.425843313522879,"score_spread":0.3506014389139272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098776700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03288992,0.0005363322,0.016696403,0.04258922,0.0021328162,0.0023049845,0.0031157334,0.00038339253,0.89935106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65592676,0.00097573025,0.048257504,0.09488187,0.00095942826,0.0039119055,0.0029767274,0.00030946292,0.19180053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8985947,0.010329147,0.0063102613,0.0049206438,0.069076374,0.010768901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8493673,0.05462961,0.00713667,0.011095484,0.071962334,0.005808588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038282927,0.0005993933,0.0011851235,0.0035847928,0.013138157,0.00999276,0.0061190478,0.013393833,0.019626943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18794984,0.000934005,0.0017779457,0.0032481349,0.010068676,0.0037554011,0.004554083,0.009837568,0.004494905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012338863,0.00017482105,0.006408981,0.00017465239,0.000044400378,0.0005431308,0.0042173355,0.000886525,0.00074347603,0.77112794,0.19922759,0.016327871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035164176,0.0004617507,0.05744804,0.0016026805,0.00025981234,0.00084370596,0.0090020755,0.009131534,0.005700297,0.14953735,0.7647224,0.0009386901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78494656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8414009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21505344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027487027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13164458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43263984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100324937","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00355.x","title":"Difficult but Not Impossible: The ANC's Decentralization Strategy in South Africa","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Development and Change","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Disadvantaged; Dispose pattern; Metropolitan area; Public administration; Globe; Economic growth; Population; Government (linguistics); Private sector; Local government; Service delivery framework; Service (business); Political science; Economics; Sociology; Economy; Engineering; Market economy","score_opus":0.06990704449413995,"score_gpt":0.29126379384606244,"score_spread":0.22135674935192248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100324937","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6659386,0.0033832616,0.0033023288,0.10851495,0.0002888487,0.00040614608,0.00003353787,0.000034491477,0.21809779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98224914,0.0005347782,0.0006416583,0.002427098,0.000029346595,0.000061074665,0.0000054810475,0.000007787339,0.014043591],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951703,0.002476278,0.00017183064,0.00022041745,0.0003722964,0.0015889729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962412,0.0017811472,0.00044667398,0.00019291908,0.00036479087,0.0009732778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069850436,0.00019762942,0.00020457576,0.00083055656,0.01545816,0.0060281027,0.0009106007,0.0025842933,0.0064253802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008265658,0.00035242148,0.00019727623,0.0011902489,0.009136026,0.0044968557,0.009028048,0.004279714,0.00021392915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007101992,0.00011567691,0.005827155,0.0003213667,0.000016731563,0.0053708563,0.22290453,0.0011462318,0.0019247594,0.7215113,0.009637555,0.031152818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010076662,0.00022271847,0.022142962,0.0011664408,0.00003233362,0.0020623596,0.28114453,0.0015646168,0.0017555862,0.07214203,0.6175694,0.000096232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044721566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08443342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044721566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012180471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016201558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0889225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101482872","doi":"10.7196/samj.8608","title":"The state of our prisons and what this reveals about our society","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"South African Medical Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; State (computer science); Prison; Democracy; Public administration; Subsistence agriculture; Economic growth; Law; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.011632435305029892,"score_gpt":0.3184013427659796,"score_spread":0.3067689074609497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101482872","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00060672255,0.083050735,0.00017867183,0.43767533,0.4721447,0.000008018107,0.000026662105,0.000025080193,0.0062841466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016863622,0.07714647,0.00021668262,0.09145884,0.80363506,0.000022476539,0.000019374658,0.000050578295,0.010586884],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944583,0.002738227,0.000415826,0.00046411777,0.001514852,0.00040868175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823079,0.0136008775,0.00072121137,0.00039034992,0.0018822718,0.0010974179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045004366,0.0012888537,0.0015470616,0.002152068,0.0069527016,0.012170233,0.0018410821,0.012531217,0.0031240229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01811588,0.00054071203,0.0010244752,0.0014995178,0.014233125,0.007899197,0.0022165934,0.020093868,0.0010198691],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020017567,0.000014747676,0.00022264726,0.000813944,0.000033806187,0.0004205401,0.0064755413,0.000072880204,0.00014019667,0.01611952,0.95890737,0.01675877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061638307,0.000014997484,0.00050522207,0.0015408873,0.000024869583,0.00028069795,0.003931088,0.00006761608,0.00007735472,0.0097889155,0.98373705,0.000025108515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055009094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011714001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012531217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044178814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065657888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032054126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103535062","doi":"10.1002/iir.1211","title":"Consumer Debt Relief in South Africa—Should the Insolvency System Provide for NINA Debtors? Lessons from New Zealand","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Creditor; Insolvency; Debt; Poverty; Economics; Business; Financial system; Economy; Finance; Economic growth","score_opus":0.0770305411021622,"score_gpt":0.36116952914453876,"score_spread":0.2841389880423766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103535062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8141014,0.006675089,0.00021573027,0.05100177,0.00015503343,0.00017631991,0.0001180919,0.000010261934,0.12754637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9672477,0.00798031,0.00051247946,0.0017033147,0.000048207356,0.00004775376,0.000036084024,0.00001188786,0.022412166],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999413,0.00012825178,0.00004028665,0.000039657712,0.000099082805,0.00027971147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989619,0.00026323253,0.00019904065,0.00005280399,0.00022985532,0.00029319315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013659293,0.00022406958,0.00020733122,0.00067659107,0.0031765732,0.0032656423,0.0005726115,0.0012523183,0.0074672312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029831566,0.00024492305,0.0002948531,0.0010673541,0.003014151,0.0028214722,0.0018030839,0.0017477061,0.00031373545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010281871,0.0007244099,0.102243766,0.0031628541,0.00008703097,0.032586023,0.3324324,0.00087078137,0.010314574,0.23848103,0.035830367,0.24223866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020280511,0.00051464164,0.29899123,0.0027397133,0.000087774766,0.003948151,0.3340084,0.00081928563,0.0017664819,0.01213173,0.34465894,0.00013081072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45997685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.607409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45997685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008794774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011776627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.914599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105418881","doi":"10.24124/c677/20078","title":"Multi-level Governance: Getting the Job Done and Respecting Community Difference – Three Winnipeg Cases","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Political Science Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Flexibility (engineering); Corporate governance; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Variety (cybernetics); Administration (probate law); Order (exchange); Political science; Multi-level governance; Business; Public relations; Economics; Law; Politics; Management; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.13177384451653296,"score_gpt":0.39242586006863867,"score_spread":0.2606520155521057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105418881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91323024,0.003735606,0.0015426537,0.01971239,0.000083154824,0.0005136745,0.000113796035,0.000009579276,0.061058864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99258584,0.0013487363,0.0008033832,0.0011453233,0.000009285801,0.00010452067,0.000024295006,0.000004706677,0.0039739907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99272513,0.0026975027,0.0002202696,0.00041857685,0.0011633452,0.0027752705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931652,0.0033825866,0.0007571033,0.00041666604,0.0009428577,0.0013355189],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007815663,0.0003806175,0.00045694294,0.002269013,0.015642863,0.0062605483,0.0020772833,0.0032846841,0.001842177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01351695,0.0005244901,0.00040110538,0.004137234,0.010128231,0.002302717,0.006543315,0.0023246417,0.00009718321],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013369777,0.00017840971,0.052606884,0.00073605904,0.00009998061,0.028842157,0.2800808,0.0014309774,0.0024811546,0.58921725,0.010279325,0.0339133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021377759,0.00013892405,0.14980651,0.0014719662,0.00022494356,0.0056469003,0.57602614,0.002152838,0.0023503585,0.030870171,0.23094141,0.00015607932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8497606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9268366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15023941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0391911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03262621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30224836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107164622","doi":"10.1080/03057070.2011.579437","title":"‘Our Struggle is for the Full Loaf’: Protests, Social Welfare and Gendered Citizenship in South Africa","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Southern African Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Welfare; Gender studies; Social citizenship; Sociology; Political science; Social Welfare; Political economy; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.1463034505101509,"score_gpt":0.3395637428216498,"score_spread":0.1932602923114989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107164622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95540816,0.003670126,0.00017656248,0.019040968,0.0000530726,0.000022953636,0.000012617586,0.0000028486265,0.021612689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99725974,0.0010117065,0.000044147488,0.00059463026,0.000014665721,0.000015700492,0.0000024330654,0.0000021296223,0.001054826],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804735,0.0012205074,0.000047505106,0.000083071354,0.00011893646,0.00048267032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751484,0.0015535363,0.0004813751,0.000053799922,0.00007218495,0.00032423728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027559707,0.0003116264,0.00030688226,0.0014732406,0.015643215,0.005985171,0.00063809246,0.0021711043,0.0036771914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00458771,0.00035055773,0.00014318488,0.002213202,0.022059703,0.0044072545,0.005638443,0.0023183157,0.00015681435],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012309183,0.000022947946,0.0039169146,0.00007648184,0.0000035865655,0.0010110871,0.96688956,0.000025469464,0.00029346574,0.022048462,0.00087869825,0.0048210192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039727133,0.000019975516,0.009898473,0.00019349554,0.0000038312996,0.00039469812,0.9679666,0.000034328536,0.000106483014,0.0035395413,0.017829247,0.000009401452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021328555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042193666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021328555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044736606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004093307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042408824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110027607","doi":"10.7202/039839ar","title":"Penalty Clauses through the Lens of Unconscionability Doctrine: Birch v. Union of Taxation Employees, Local 70030","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Doctrine; Appeal; Law; Political science; Legal doctrine; Law and economics; Economics; Business","score_opus":0.030636016975081126,"score_gpt":0.32612853735531183,"score_spread":0.2954925203802307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110027607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18322529,0.022596762,0.0070923073,0.14419314,0.0011270717,0.00018889204,0.00016455924,0.00009454096,0.6413174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9275808,0.004062929,0.0009290236,0.01602779,0.00024892183,0.00005335748,0.000033380198,0.000018539726,0.051045265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810755,0.00038513457,0.00005100513,0.00010848652,0.00062546245,0.00072233187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931955,0.0003351068,0.0000764039,0.0000233538,0.0001742656,0.000071396615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014611105,0.0003308759,0.00023598455,0.0011618154,0.0073864455,0.0036576074,0.0015009427,0.0064158835,0.00204159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038462288,0.00030578766,0.00034657642,0.0011212961,0.007788297,0.0022057572,0.0009937481,0.004743043,0.00025875308],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020665013,0.000027379774,0.0015740136,0.00006672447,0.00000803335,0.0013967147,0.009608022,0.000572356,0.00036527225,0.9529889,0.024885591,0.008486313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092207876,0.00016717259,0.029408744,0.00074898265,0.000117100164,0.0015913757,0.035289418,0.002684685,0.0026060964,0.23518948,0.69186765,0.00023699502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61880285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8030073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61880285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021649832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015914671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7668842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110624938","doi":"10.1177/1743872110378707","title":"Legal Judgment and Cape Colonial Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Contradiction; Performative utterance; Law; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Power (physics); Legal realism; Epistemology; Political science; History; Legal profession; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.014802688930022824,"score_gpt":0.2618092153669088,"score_spread":0.247006526436886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110624938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17855576,0.020054214,0.0016672257,0.08772153,0.00069940777,0.00005336951,0.000057922392,0.000023276423,0.7111673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724324,0.002495658,0.00038560297,0.0030150255,0.000106152016,0.000021136242,0.000007293728,0.0000155151,0.021521213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717796,0.0014946922,0.00012312879,0.00026812492,0.00043073067,0.000505435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99559635,0.002658725,0.00057773705,0.000271458,0.000509771,0.0003859436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024571726,0.00024931808,0.0001898095,0.0012132591,0.01601351,0.0066673076,0.00060137233,0.001878624,0.0055632703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016675083,0.00023868663,0.000103449864,0.0018801419,0.030440724,0.0036031357,0.0042009493,0.0035751704,0.00028006488],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011567158,0.0000076830665,0.0011098215,0.00007293162,0.0000030129875,0.0011179127,0.11241585,0.000090352056,0.0001987826,0.8681156,0.0075300424,0.009326496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000223783,0.000024069095,0.008068944,0.0014846809,0.00001355437,0.0011632064,0.09983636,0.00035931214,0.0005723941,0.19588213,0.6925237,0.0000491091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11349019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14688405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11349019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017194653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009629608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22565919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112572389","doi":"10.1177/135822910100500306","title":"Toward Substantive Equality: A Feminist Critique of the Notion of Difference in the Canadian and South African Equality Tests","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Discrimination and the Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normality; Sociology; Hegemony; Jurisprudence; Perspective (graphical); Gender studies; Reading (process); Law; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06608083827679245,"score_gpt":0.3597831751199686,"score_spread":0.29370233684317615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112572389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036168095,0.012644012,0.018609324,0.3691902,0.0010511329,0.00008940716,0.00026008583,0.0000636419,0.56192404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92178565,0.0030460218,0.0073678796,0.027615221,0.00046644345,0.00009310009,0.000055418717,0.0000567562,0.039513458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898399,0.0025207885,0.00019715299,0.0008511037,0.004673354,0.0019177357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932632,0.0037861646,0.0002887437,0.00023980811,0.001970794,0.00045134756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008114823,0.00059365184,0.0005899483,0.0029403472,0.02099083,0.008573079,0.0028236557,0.006395998,0.003624009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017003726,0.00040376626,0.0005457651,0.002557436,0.08017889,0.005224119,0.004511285,0.01251865,0.00023628917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002629178,0.0000021293397,0.000071591494,0.000008829832,0.0000010578398,0.000022174858,0.004242024,0.00005645795,0.000030284218,0.9912339,0.0023123655,0.002016576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000323932,0.000017100912,0.0028999927,0.00030999834,0.000019156789,0.00014642559,0.014291912,0.0008184273,0.0005178901,0.69467545,0.28620192,0.00006936902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9038495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8987561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09615052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07904888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0708026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5735425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113683616","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v17i6.04","title":"Arbitration of family separation issues – a useful adjunct to mediation and the court process","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Mediation; Dispute resolution; Compulsory arbitration; Law; Adversarial system; Political science; Alternative dispute resolution; Arbitration clause; Federal Arbitration Act; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.010679055463419719,"score_gpt":0.3214630370797933,"score_spread":0.31078398161637355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113683616","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014789601,0.0871143,0.13828616,0.11127013,0.0029804667,0.00020105943,0.00005701738,0.00014424977,0.64515704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83280224,0.024590371,0.039169747,0.0077477917,0.0031771336,0.00021580547,0.000046900503,0.0000956046,0.09215444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9730377,0.02069045,0.00074902584,0.0011111235,0.003037259,0.0013745336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915244,0.005708715,0.00091330643,0.00084077416,0.0005848757,0.0004279638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015489782,0.0006338714,0.00087611104,0.0020948648,0.010402599,0.013619881,0.00224721,0.006417276,0.011156337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015863374,0.0003136218,0.00069476815,0.002451514,0.025060898,0.014938986,0.012513871,0.006725404,0.0014326621],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005207517,0.0000043448317,0.00005073729,0.000036824895,0.0000029088956,0.00014558903,0.0030999926,0.00012968261,0.000055128407,0.9858906,0.0022244977,0.008354442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008405633,0.000028643506,0.00018082806,0.000297685,0.0000071838926,0.0004108862,0.0034015444,0.00057697925,0.00029998203,0.69880986,0.29595253,0.00002541651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00428047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041257213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015489782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047918004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065652356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081918776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114615455","doi":"10.1177/135822910000400403","title":"Can Law Protect Language? Law, Language and Human Rights in the South African Constitution","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Discrimination and the Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Mandate; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Duty; Law; Population; Political science; Human rights; Public administration; Citizenship; Sociology; Politics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.013517603621007627,"score_gpt":0.31401365460878616,"score_spread":0.30049605098777854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114615455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06305605,0.030723717,0.0060605207,0.33528346,0.0012644533,0.00009355558,0.00010142229,0.000040027444,0.56337667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92991984,0.008466539,0.0015492823,0.025366744,0.00068230706,0.00012978961,0.000034141194,0.000029420491,0.03382189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99595886,0.0019026259,0.00013801958,0.0003154723,0.00052113883,0.0011639823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965224,0.0024249577,0.00028966603,0.00023369248,0.0002537349,0.0002755919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063905367,0.00034494884,0.00049139856,0.0013914302,0.010687267,0.009702555,0.0008277529,0.0059760087,0.0067701074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012012148,0.0003345582,0.0002890137,0.0017857705,0.0459692,0.012131896,0.004872323,0.0073204525,0.0007132724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003525211,0.0000039740994,0.00010356325,0.000017125843,0.0000011946938,0.00006974658,0.0036348265,0.000035752637,0.00007062966,0.9922827,0.0015812904,0.0021956074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027997103,0.000026568272,0.0014473,0.0007157013,0.000012750198,0.00018134175,0.010589356,0.00015791904,0.00028891987,0.74486285,0.2416589,0.000030373125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028087294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023539666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028087294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066610677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055847585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114923845","doi":"","title":"Die reg op toegang tot inligting in publieke administrasie","year":2009,"lang":"af","type":"dissertation","venue":"Unisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.02306091923866505,"score_gpt":0.24974946154054498,"score_spread":0.22668854230187993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114923845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010648307,0.016779969,0.004698972,0.030074563,0.0041982103,0.00020858903,0.0023325367,0.0005346523,0.9305241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08178895,0.010542047,0.0028536778,0.0047768056,0.0010019836,0.00021399604,0.0013676378,0.0004324754,0.89702237],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99488384,0.0010857184,0.00028781706,0.00041492545,0.0025373597,0.0007903584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99738413,0.0009103065,0.00028328405,0.00034376536,0.00069631374,0.00038221345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049976655,0.00048645705,0.00045284413,0.0014113003,0.0030321246,0.0122766225,0.0007962977,0.0024237956,0.07922605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008480326,0.00038030648,0.00035006946,0.002269824,0.0017720804,0.004416166,0.0043492587,0.0036996328,0.033323765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015156655,0.00011895256,0.002242921,0.00057529355,0.000022150634,0.0004603542,0.006195216,0.0002677099,0.0021811111,0.35048756,0.4152643,0.22203301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032425282,0.000006701735,0.0007420031,0.000059511698,0.000002459461,0.000030420975,0.00023570938,0.000018764515,0.00020266837,0.0013236582,0.99737144,0.000003407922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017900076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017691022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07922605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050782226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009887242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26503754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115924852","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2013/v16i1a2319","title":"The Impact on Women on the Removal of Gender as a Rating Variable in Motor-Vehicle Insurance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; Yale University","keywords":"Actuarial science; Disadvantaged; Legislation; Variable (mathematics); Promotion (chess); Economics; Business; Law; Political science; Economic growth; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01805414983900718,"score_gpt":0.3180676394324125,"score_spread":0.30001348959340535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115924852","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70846486,0.0017550974,0.003021797,0.040432844,0.0009852446,0.0002065575,0.0002983398,0.000032349937,0.24480288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713111,0.0006310349,0.0006577689,0.014141921,0.0002203456,0.00005628044,0.000049274928,0.000016802791,0.012915475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830466,0.004602514,0.00060995267,0.0012687289,0.006246708,0.0042254906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9730416,0.017961634,0.0032818813,0.0012730941,0.0031526664,0.0012892002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01407832,0.00025743118,0.0004179346,0.0010733738,0.004874888,0.003193694,0.001156777,0.0026060059,0.0073612737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039975304,0.00032208476,0.0011758786,0.0009366187,0.0043296497,0.0016224147,0.0035539763,0.0044306093,0.00064639794],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014499662,0.0005094753,0.30386734,0.00044078086,0.00030023634,0.0068977247,0.034827467,0.0017722088,0.01239336,0.4511976,0.031244954,0.15509881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002361493,0.0015534139,0.6276621,0.0020038986,0.0012108146,0.0033316,0.02753102,0.0034305379,0.027650876,0.027374316,0.2777202,0.0002950438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07159204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13647893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07159204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004486093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006847438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14235061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120296895","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1061","title":"Remedial Power of Administrative Tribunals","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Tribunal; Charter; Constitution; Political science; Jurisdiction; Statute; Administrative law; Judicial review","score_opus":0.07423987899678985,"score_gpt":0.39523443980314216,"score_spread":0.3209945608063523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120296895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065010466,0.0036343685,0.056407038,0.020339217,0.0012329472,0.00051688123,0.000111599664,0.00041305923,0.8523343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9024142,0.00096963474,0.009933534,0.0038346106,0.000962709,0.00034190435,0.000052151267,0.00011579029,0.081375465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.965003,0.009004434,0.0019613544,0.0043523973,0.01379726,0.00588157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9618334,0.016022773,0.0031484303,0.0089877015,0.0072402395,0.002767413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027355485,0.00084792235,0.0010202947,0.0057689156,0.011137479,0.01526866,0.004968903,0.007786395,0.019235577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058788847,0.0009063118,0.0014724686,0.0020838403,0.022569006,0.008993618,0.01297678,0.011331418,0.0035453106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022981458,0.000055216417,0.00055930915,0.00005318042,0.000021692767,0.00018939427,0.0015254505,0.00081789424,0.00081533747,0.9793251,0.0023877323,0.014226683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024171696,0.0003707212,0.0031087417,0.0005403275,0.00014243687,0.0007574966,0.0035986607,0.005225826,0.0043141553,0.54252183,0.43897563,0.00020243635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068514696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007527451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027355485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005615311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013150596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14467132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120716607","doi":"","title":"Employee Rights In Bankruptcy Protection And Bankruptcy & Receivership | Ontario Ministry of Labour","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receivership; Bankruptcy; Business; Christian ministry; Finance; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.027202807990937244,"score_gpt":0.29191503648539535,"score_spread":0.2647122284944581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120716607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.080876954,0.009660098,0.0006383318,0.17197041,0.0014551043,0.000459545,0.0018695068,0.00006780293,0.7330023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2379674,0.004597414,0.0008489847,0.0071522477,0.00033589127,0.00009513543,0.00029311195,0.000049277063,0.7486605],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954613,0.00043033398,0.0002138784,0.00020265269,0.0020512508,0.0016405517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992568,0.0016019462,0.00056272064,0.0003326955,0.002779881,0.0021547377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030881588,0.00021520721,0.00024578508,0.00082575233,0.011774353,0.00661216,0.000923734,0.0038936944,0.024576971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077582747,0.00054452795,0.0002159311,0.0013107775,0.0040561697,0.0016174536,0.0020761557,0.0027870464,0.002058383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001371851,0.00012071333,0.017279448,0.00030098873,0.000020027268,0.0006570432,0.0259285,0.0003564261,0.0014709064,0.27788463,0.5929897,0.082854405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024544315,0.00001460025,0.026221221,0.0001962466,0.000010087599,0.000054445634,0.0040712543,0.0001449768,0.00030921513,0.0029215307,0.96599066,0.000041061918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94972086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98305905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0526238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0526238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14953324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38181418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121329059","doi":"10.3828/bjcs.19.2.11","title":"Human Rights Codes: Are They Ready for Today's Challenges?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Human rights; Commission; Nova scotia; Equity (law); Political science; Sociology; Law; Work (physics); Engineering","score_opus":0.08018853485791355,"score_gpt":0.3436190799789972,"score_spread":0.26343054512108366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121329059","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030211832,0.014523098,0.001448557,0.9430424,0.0056988425,0.00001708708,0.000059039514,0.000055838456,0.03213393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47883835,0.054725405,0.014586261,0.33545265,0.018996885,0.00029111127,0.00049249525,0.00044367946,0.09617317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97558326,0.008416616,0.00058078463,0.0016601218,0.0074354396,0.0063238167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9384235,0.024052333,0.0033286721,0.004848967,0.013928499,0.015418104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023001548,0.00080169964,0.000996763,0.00262182,0.013572488,0.026747508,0.0030261527,0.014873553,0.016184054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06140634,0.0005312752,0.0006107512,0.0027394043,0.050125632,0.029112604,0.008696458,0.023019433,0.0041567036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028513117,0.00003881739,0.0020101664,0.00026780256,0.000010466417,0.00024368148,0.01439153,0.0001551501,0.00025374413,0.58172536,0.28707263,0.113802075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001338237,0.000029108971,0.004517272,0.0018874642,0.000009593967,0.00022468103,0.04641325,0.00027019536,0.00014438853,0.20547801,0.7409323,0.00008029713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23214109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29869998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9727342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027265802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05138015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46157974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122093054","doi":"","title":"Fixed election dates and the Governor General's power to grant dissolution","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Governor; Power (physics); General election; Political science; Public administration; Internal medicine; Economics; Medicine; Law; Physics; Politics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.02107787189601682,"score_gpt":0.2792371100888111,"score_spread":0.25815923819279424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122093054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.123178475,0.012578942,0.0041158632,0.22922449,0.0050900527,0.00047080027,0.0013021949,0.00015537861,0.6238837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8916818,0.002758681,0.0014406041,0.034270786,0.0016620735,0.0002882622,0.00018190754,0.00015254562,0.06756339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9208253,0.0227387,0.0044488166,0.0051503633,0.019561537,0.027275326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.72712094,0.20170964,0.009853531,0.008036016,0.035864115,0.017415715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11081852,0.0005201061,0.0018708638,0.0070925187,0.019896302,0.026277058,0.006084577,0.018061131,0.015020391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3024387,0.0019138578,0.0011237363,0.007273787,0.015960088,0.0069671697,0.004996082,0.019906575,0.0012326604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036169012,0.00007620083,0.0055473116,0.00023224551,0.00011177905,0.0002545882,0.0047876416,0.0012559949,0.00036540625,0.85302407,0.104266144,0.029716969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000802015,0.00027920766,0.059073746,0.0016063721,0.0005278229,0.00026746123,0.010903139,0.0023801997,0.0022157915,0.20241937,0.7190218,0.00050305884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5188069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.733973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93350965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06649036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1268978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96805394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123220012","doi":"10.1177/0964663913502509","title":"Criminal Justice and Cape Law’s Persons","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Prince Albert Grand Council","funders":"","keywords":"Expansive; Politics; Criminal law; Jurisdiction; Criminal justice; Law; Personhood; Criminology; Political science; Economic Justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.0639379628286415,"score_gpt":0.3747237199031805,"score_spread":0.310785757074539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123220012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43023807,0.013507476,0.00067140727,0.02606339,0.0004023017,0.00007121881,0.0001271823,0.000018254415,0.5289007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97709364,0.0022136313,0.0002031441,0.0010281546,0.000060877355,0.000023168022,0.000017580041,0.000011724222,0.019347982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904174,0.00043761177,0.000038920654,0.00010887643,0.00016022935,0.00021261949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998845,0.00055514876,0.00022475809,0.00009995308,0.00008076836,0.00019431983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009756242,0.00019556185,0.0001621274,0.0017593262,0.013206071,0.0050927564,0.00053862314,0.0011265584,0.00847034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004261752,0.00020566492,0.00008381905,0.0019504646,0.023030331,0.0035043624,0.0046979687,0.0022409428,0.00031472708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000134554,0.00001703911,0.0020565933,0.00008007,0.000004384389,0.0011565547,0.43263832,0.00003438825,0.00041895625,0.5458192,0.0057497155,0.012011232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020484913,0.00004507878,0.025900235,0.0009263527,0.000013428044,0.0014003364,0.3000812,0.00006261781,0.000528062,0.05214814,0.6188358,0.000038291884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058790337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12153683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058790337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00783342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003249557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11689627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123802935","doi":"10.1163/156920905774270457","title":"Cultural Perceptions of Africans in Diaspora and in Africa on Atlantic Slave Trade and Reparations","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African and Asian Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Diaspora; Corporation; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); African studies; Political science; Middle Passage; Perception; Sociology; Law; Gender studies; Psychology","score_opus":0.04019569952181833,"score_gpt":0.3425869583322969,"score_spread":0.30239125881047857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123802935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99721366,0.00012597642,0.00003449766,0.0003882324,0.000011291113,0.000005397974,0.000005450505,5.275276e-7,0.0022150273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99933773,0.0002326829,0.000023739334,0.00010395698,0.000006266467,0.0000036525216,0.000003361855,6.9542864e-7,0.00028794495],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984439,0.00093518937,0.000059050988,0.000055071927,0.00020146952,0.0003052951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973832,0.00076306926,0.0008013468,0.00008535301,0.00034479334,0.0006221605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021728426,0.00027820756,0.00029913711,0.00094612053,0.0038144037,0.0021207016,0.0003257478,0.0004566466,0.0037415563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042862194,0.00015969845,0.00021831822,0.0008002308,0.0047171847,0.0010780775,0.0018394574,0.0011153839,0.00016371053],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006819241,0.00015551121,0.1352261,0.000076792254,0.00003297104,0.00094762276,0.8486991,0.000049071634,0.002198501,0.0030999917,0.0006051681,0.008840947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034001157,0.00007629122,0.055749245,0.00007430273,0.0000066656735,0.00020570675,0.9406489,0.000044324242,0.00015469501,0.00020880412,0.0028178678,0.000009910129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0107641565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0135009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0107641565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074684987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007551181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021403015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125101295","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v5n1p9","title":"Social Justice: Reflections on Human Dignity and Equality","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Excuse; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Political science; Health care; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.16411613218495924,"score_gpt":0.4839335848241642,"score_spread":0.31981745263920497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125101295","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014620106,0.03663781,0.0033792946,0.8104223,0.005056191,0.000069432215,0.00004212944,0.000021699492,0.12975103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69171745,0.023118086,0.0030010175,0.25018272,0.0045754947,0.0002740639,0.000031836793,0.000077304234,0.027022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9627101,0.025437197,0.001067426,0.0023341482,0.004241565,0.004209538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96851635,0.02619541,0.0011558741,0.0011980566,0.001391636,0.0015427376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034866948,0.0008930924,0.0012002833,0.0014880139,0.01751401,0.022550847,0.0030764563,0.025508774,0.004280295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02637255,0.0004075098,0.0010954802,0.0012534305,0.15241526,0.025179818,0.016612774,0.026892494,0.00061932846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015082094,0.000026069067,0.00015362186,0.00011163263,0.0000063506436,0.00019182506,0.03368999,0.00006942754,0.00007596584,0.94944555,0.010621375,0.005593043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036373902,0.000114959585,0.00065430644,0.0015280431,0.000013896366,0.0003105662,0.077362284,0.00015506223,0.00042065795,0.6773038,0.24205063,0.000049412625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016949527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021794511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034866948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0140617825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024161097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1843962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126769189","doi":"10.1177/1077801212453430","title":"Violence Against Women in South Africa","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Violence Against Women","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Position (finance); Government (linguistics); Poison control; Human rights; Domestic violence; Sexual violence; Human factors and ergonomics; Criminology; Suicide prevention; Political science; Law; Injury prevention; Sociology; Medicine; Medical emergency; Business","score_opus":0.019037978465048882,"score_gpt":0.27713929310534846,"score_spread":0.25810131464029956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126769189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71195555,0.12197315,0.0003226243,0.063170105,0.0006278046,0.00013454608,0.00017043581,0.000015617257,0.10163024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9431716,0.05067233,0.00018111576,0.0024626786,0.000104811465,0.000049621933,0.000026377495,0.0000032695955,0.003328307],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990921,0.0004765887,0.000058549085,0.00004992528,0.0001290978,0.00019365444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924517,0.00028382346,0.00029114136,0.000014997117,0.00006611046,0.00009876835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010409332,0.00028559525,0.00026690378,0.0018626038,0.005312175,0.0027477397,0.0002961996,0.0010699695,0.0053604273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029597976,0.0002113547,0.000145462,0.0032203088,0.0029599762,0.0014721979,0.0025760734,0.0008000595,0.00020929836],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057897534,0.00010269706,0.10664238,0.0037936252,0.00005727018,0.0077579604,0.60336006,0.00018407468,0.0022986953,0.07117829,0.014674311,0.18989274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017256436,0.000104024075,0.14425841,0.005993024,0.000049046106,0.0036019683,0.63351864,0.00007710203,0.00046794658,0.009619105,0.20225617,0.000037309394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028483557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05182385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028483557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027279947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052438937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05663556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127725437","doi":"10.1002/iir.1233","title":"Perspectives on the South African Responsible Lending Regime and the Duty to Conduct Pre‐agreement Assessment as a Responsible Lending Practice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exposition (narrative); Debt; Duty; Economics; Business; Political science; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.12399551837239799,"score_gpt":0.45362418167625207,"score_spread":0.3296286633038541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127725437","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2980276,0.035233002,0.016851513,0.4422525,0.001405988,0.00019768106,0.00007989878,0.000051430616,0.20590036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97414976,0.0054265503,0.0027035582,0.0063232025,0.00020247314,0.000069478716,0.000008224322,0.000016145035,0.011100534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905372,0.005776639,0.00048180472,0.0005494643,0.0011303208,0.0015246741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98802745,0.007986819,0.0015647897,0.0004960489,0.0010021637,0.00092273916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01396798,0.00032718573,0.00029244792,0.0012679796,0.006804212,0.0107184695,0.000963483,0.004157237,0.0037002182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01178847,0.00036701423,0.00030332486,0.0017497396,0.021484787,0.006879785,0.0064035505,0.0068954285,0.00032326818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031064294,0.000028899049,0.0026842775,0.00041179394,0.0000075986773,0.0014214759,0.15995713,0.00028638134,0.0014501286,0.80575585,0.0037352208,0.024230188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001872283,0.00008642023,0.014491916,0.0029299394,0.000017144308,0.0014241054,0.20445889,0.00083996984,0.0026188788,0.21037678,0.56265414,0.000082976316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009465832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011920272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01396798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074814204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015964905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0738706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130290708","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2002.tb01160.x","title":"Designing a merit‐based process for appointing boards of abcs: Lessons from the Nova Scotia reform experience","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; Political science; Veto; Nova scotia; Public administration; Humanities; Politics; Law; Sociology; Ethnology; Art","score_opus":0.11515505098058823,"score_gpt":0.36579358106839904,"score_spread":0.2506385300878108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130290708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76539654,0.0013916026,0.0035481548,0.062313657,0.00045471115,0.0007596236,0.00018143308,0.000087955545,0.16586633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95957845,0.00031842224,0.0018125306,0.0027840494,0.000032613993,0.00008980801,0.00004072428,0.00003258747,0.035310794],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98665255,0.0052294657,0.0003263714,0.0005472483,0.0015942954,0.0056499825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839662,0.0046992493,0.00081523444,0.0008178439,0.003279194,0.0064223064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010657894,0.00023813425,0.00032447762,0.00086984306,0.023540176,0.008472067,0.0019093453,0.0025010698,0.004773865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015171449,0.0006057356,0.00024887727,0.0010793863,0.008420058,0.0015982882,0.004707881,0.0034769913,0.00062920334],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005482366,0.00061207224,0.08765397,0.00045966284,0.00004649996,0.0072963107,0.55425316,0.005053096,0.0045367274,0.16897584,0.05750394,0.11306041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003028439,0.00047874777,0.11737747,0.00052816764,0.00006241966,0.0006520001,0.3433368,0.0036899147,0.0017482362,0.006448614,0.52517194,0.00020287797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.957371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98808086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13854298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13854298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12830329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99916804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131814071","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2009/v12i4a2747","title":"The Constitutional Validity of Search and Seizure Powers in South African Criminal Procedure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Search and seizure; Constitution; Criminal procedure; Law; Democracy; Law enforcement; State (computer science); Political science; Enforcement; Business; Supreme court; Politics","score_opus":0.030630525159094132,"score_gpt":0.32502375730937255,"score_spread":0.2943932321502784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131814071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19995643,0.005146684,0.017746875,0.017861256,0.00049964496,0.00036265288,0.00038874446,0.00008947503,0.7579482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97926736,0.000942226,0.0028920455,0.0026297492,0.0002940107,0.00038201787,0.00004977653,0.000034230394,0.013508514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98178077,0.005679163,0.0018845423,0.0027121317,0.004786494,0.0031568576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98032117,0.013193669,0.0019436363,0.002415113,0.0015491904,0.0005772154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015719697,0.0003502482,0.0008295781,0.0025481319,0.011282956,0.012706181,0.0017290957,0.006065246,0.005367528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027928004,0.0011041631,0.00070118206,0.002299012,0.038065966,0.0076240776,0.0069802296,0.009515364,0.0008230786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012982446,0.000005378409,0.00029140513,0.000016504768,0.0000032873759,0.000076678116,0.0015275507,0.000081291015,0.00016776782,0.99577916,0.0004250762,0.001613009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014264647,0.00016229038,0.0069146166,0.0009701348,0.00015933637,0.00065023475,0.003832178,0.0023779834,0.004161669,0.8393933,0.14105949,0.00017610105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026339918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024986463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026339918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008985199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012649349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08313471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132792422","doi":"10.1007/s12132-010-9078-5","title":"Including Women? (Dis)junctures Between Voice, Policy and Implementation in Integrated Development Planning","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Urban Forum","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Transformative learning; Agency (philosophy); Democracy; Citizen journalism; Space (punctuation); Corporate governance; Public administration; Political science; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Human geography; Perspective (graphical); Economic growth; Public relations; Management; Politics; Pedagogy; Economics; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.023278808015207392,"score_gpt":0.3646012295160244,"score_spread":0.34132242150081704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132792422","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1133518,0.006257318,0.0058151386,0.6120062,0.0013298086,0.0001485721,0.000053507334,0.000042328273,0.26099533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9621189,0.0010752886,0.0010086169,0.019189406,0.00027280225,0.00018029545,0.000008694244,0.000030368734,0.016115531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9742302,0.01779983,0.00049944565,0.00089018117,0.0011726263,0.0054078023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979538,0.014505887,0.0015861085,0.0006219538,0.00086037326,0.0028876192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033714272,0.00043116085,0.00049737276,0.0010785296,0.025738118,0.022616506,0.00179697,0.011666952,0.014276101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042093813,0.0008278129,0.00035362833,0.0017842505,0.03427322,0.019936468,0.016542204,0.01180819,0.00068548584],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004960149,0.00007690698,0.0022682163,0.00014745671,0.000014152678,0.0008735613,0.27245894,0.00015553189,0.00030227844,0.67744863,0.013059999,0.03314471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004882715,0.00009929752,0.0051630605,0.0012568026,0.000054353553,0.0004253237,0.5269515,0.00023301129,0.0006452032,0.1837817,0.28128445,0.00005646999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026757317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04990169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033714272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011382778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03512388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17830026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133502498","doi":"10.12735/jfe.v2i1p28","title":"The Constitutionality of Prescription Periods in the South African Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Finance & Economics","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Medical prescription; Law; Political science; Medicine; Constitution; Nursing","score_opus":0.020800130981242393,"score_gpt":0.276397518324489,"score_spread":0.2555973873432466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133502498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2862884,0.011670746,0.026407575,0.025625091,0.0006284725,0.0005215741,0.0007282501,0.00015871577,0.6479712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9668988,0.0016620188,0.0047436655,0.002789088,0.00017036113,0.00030496318,0.00004830951,0.000025649355,0.023357136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961659,0.0011969161,0.0004738755,0.0006180124,0.0007479612,0.0007974248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99605113,0.0023745422,0.00043723834,0.00055154477,0.00036159117,0.0002240948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054475716,0.00023358643,0.00040611753,0.0011352343,0.005986592,0.0074778837,0.00069307483,0.0038837257,0.003772167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008606381,0.00091800775,0.00039184652,0.0015089178,0.0125754,0.0049534403,0.002826259,0.0049210745,0.0003961135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001711129,0.000005912375,0.00024008793,0.00002800352,0.0000032496164,0.000074437856,0.0017070542,0.0001128443,0.0006145585,0.9943387,0.00062637526,0.0022315667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001716114,0.00015076032,0.0078523215,0.0007943295,0.00011525039,0.0005142957,0.0028476433,0.0019433914,0.004699815,0.607177,0.37356067,0.00017298789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017656751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023535354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017656751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066691274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009440191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048388183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135712619","doi":"10.12927/hcq.2009.20750","title":"Questions &amp; Answers: Words from the Street: Delivering on a Provincial Mandate at the Local Level","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Healthcare Quarterly","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Grand River Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Best practice; Public administration; Public relations; Business; Medical education; Medicine; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04675419127981048,"score_gpt":0.3435208586272263,"score_spread":0.29676666734741586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135712619","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017429939,0.0030881232,0.0053863577,0.7393103,0.015848214,0.0030164225,0.0100685125,0.0022533457,0.20359878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19660684,0.0107511515,0.01871914,0.32007548,0.00871019,0.007551937,0.008777891,0.001381624,0.42742574],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989312,0.00033734023,0.00016313812,0.000065120934,0.00027185475,0.00023127947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99360484,0.0021296083,0.0006855322,0.00016764736,0.0022143396,0.0011979486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001942158,0.00064445136,0.0005031612,0.0005511417,0.0030243564,0.0018995878,0.00091169117,0.006405969,0.17324083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023302699,0.00026382224,0.00051271537,0.0006436534,0.0010841143,0.003026593,0.0025019716,0.0023011893,0.059786417],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006323993,0.00006487324,0.0011177007,0.00024405649,0.0000034380967,0.00021392322,0.0017950116,0.000073335046,0.00020701313,0.0009856843,0.97763157,0.017600268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008767182,0.00009045456,0.005806102,0.0007163045,0.0000112464195,0.00043869953,0.01260065,0.00025148035,0.0003830498,0.002438831,0.97712517,0.00005043267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014253526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017154964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17324083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027624576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042643044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5795483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137187785","doi":"10.1093/icon/mon004","title":"The role of dignity in equality law: Lessons from Canada and South Africa","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Temptation; Underpinning; Value (mathematics); Law; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03387566459346647,"score_gpt":0.31228142075917004,"score_spread":0.27840575616570357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137187785","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22484726,0.037500072,0.001842521,0.38681462,0.0007150793,0.00021115188,0.00036425592,0.000029595883,0.34767547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95791966,0.014667459,0.0011841723,0.010899269,0.00007218044,0.000058161233,0.00006282704,0.00003347626,0.015102778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99435765,0.0012231213,0.00018685659,0.00035656782,0.0013155062,0.0025603164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98414963,0.007805019,0.00040958193,0.00030816192,0.0043726084,0.002955016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008398968,0.00044583576,0.0009482151,0.0027065806,0.022552604,0.010911061,0.0026425878,0.0043445886,0.0089694355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029811474,0.00030928224,0.00048661916,0.004890789,0.02407072,0.006545333,0.006287467,0.007903095,0.00024389027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014782493,0.00010051236,0.016980838,0.0005746984,0.00004673394,0.0022358694,0.15158823,0.0008014389,0.00024287461,0.645382,0.032968793,0.14893019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009948496,0.00009633424,0.056874715,0.0062367823,0.00015356572,0.0007027664,0.46550098,0.0012730772,0.0006051775,0.21213105,0.25610703,0.00021904494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98874193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99566877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13472907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13472907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25457856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9775324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138402929","doi":"10.1111/plar.12055","title":"Documenting “Community” in the ≠khomani San Land Claim in South Africa","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PoLAR Political and Legal Anthropology Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Term (time); Politics; Government (linguistics); Political science; Desert (philosophy); Tracking (education); Sociology; Geography; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.03980802614158203,"score_gpt":0.36173453990225246,"score_spread":0.32192651376067044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138402929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86781895,0.010638591,0.0039508035,0.020964403,0.00017137155,0.00025153733,0.00021947033,0.000032068445,0.0959527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98846686,0.0039298586,0.002188729,0.0004436418,0.00004351346,0.00006679433,0.00006842626,0.000017647735,0.0047745956],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99698156,0.001657229,0.00024901718,0.00018409976,0.0006809685,0.00024713489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846846,0.010816607,0.0024519032,0.0007222524,0.0009493149,0.00037536447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006378494,0.00018636271,0.0002298549,0.0042927344,0.009072773,0.007161822,0.00096890226,0.0016281466,0.002736048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015193893,0.00024560423,0.00009074198,0.0063631423,0.011785021,0.007142836,0.0052709407,0.0013756349,0.00024891668],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002407614,0.00003069469,0.010435215,0.0006088499,0.000007263618,0.0028464738,0.87404877,0.00010754858,0.0019077626,0.059029553,0.0026556812,0.04829811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008388922,0.000031854743,0.020009877,0.0014767678,0.000014649025,0.0018854836,0.7833081,0.0001508202,0.0014598998,0.009712235,0.18191123,0.00003068607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02019209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04438104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02019209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004685163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008297125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040149093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140264524","doi":"","title":"The Beneficiary’s Bank and Beneficiary Described by Name and Number: Liability Chain and Liability Standard in Wire Transfers (Part 1)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Liability; Art; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009834545048129027,"score_gpt":0.2640484558326957,"score_spread":0.2542139107845667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140264524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2576246,0.0022300906,0.10381396,0.03574449,0.000974892,0.00026120318,0.00022231563,0.0002196073,0.59890884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9329318,0.0009875608,0.017168913,0.0033017576,0.0004542955,0.00015998776,0.00012991787,0.000099718614,0.04476617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895746,0.00504168,0.001174532,0.0006134434,0.002886422,0.0007094644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.978451,0.014405764,0.0020865984,0.0018334506,0.0028389741,0.00038411867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010582863,0.00024799496,0.00032505413,0.0019019716,0.0052017528,0.005561915,0.0011518861,0.0037827452,0.008699879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028692644,0.0005538025,0.00026197542,0.001812928,0.012187891,0.011304402,0.0041857567,0.003999003,0.0016606632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037260226,0.000021116675,0.002698916,0.000041099174,0.0000026457853,0.00032941846,0.0071692457,0.00024511674,0.0005197829,0.96945155,0.0054832175,0.014000578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000365628,0.00024454377,0.021914812,0.0011208332,0.000048858637,0.0035342404,0.02408737,0.005243452,0.0073385662,0.6255371,0.31072617,0.00016755763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005941489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055729207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010582863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030440122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004202244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055968225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141250364","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v3n1p38","title":"Harassment in the Workplace: Context as Indicator","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Race (biology); Context (archaeology); Political science; Politics; Racism; Sociology; Criminology; Law; Gender studies; History","score_opus":0.07790474503234336,"score_gpt":0.473657742509328,"score_spread":0.39575299747698467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141250364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9688315,0.004270115,0.0010084965,0.0027612415,0.000104403174,0.00005261209,0.00017321363,0.0000063475336,0.022792125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978229,0.001265791,0.00031444136,0.0001217521,0.00003776718,0.000017905097,0.00003275904,0.0000021839078,0.00038446422],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676263,0.0018717203,0.0002253749,0.00019760737,0.00047685707,0.00046572986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99413824,0.0017309105,0.0024017268,0.00017558821,0.0007091787,0.0008443761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015885003,0.0002518232,0.0003680098,0.002508534,0.0025768604,0.0045980546,0.00035404696,0.00065628684,0.0028326723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069199777,0.00017174555,0.00018393218,0.0028298735,0.0029853357,0.0020843092,0.004794694,0.0010216287,0.00022892209],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018496045,0.00018893054,0.8119722,0.0007498475,0.000089252295,0.0021798054,0.10127331,0.0003941851,0.0019752386,0.017279144,0.0014588364,0.062254366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006258959,0.00023756966,0.6943771,0.0011283455,0.000075006195,0.0013302364,0.28075415,0.00032483757,0.00053883257,0.0041673174,0.016996399,0.00006385259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051375586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012126902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051375586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019814332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018642383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014376402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142806756","doi":"","title":"Disability Equality Rights in South Africa: Concepts, Interpretation and the Transformation Imperative","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Dignity; Political science; Redress; Law and economics; Disability studies; Transformative learning; Scholarship; International human rights law; Medical model of disability; Sociology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.011359584954886539,"score_gpt":0.3152093886211726,"score_spread":0.30384980366628606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142806756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066348694,0.049443316,0.015932344,0.18404421,0.00096975,0.00014557276,0.00009065009,0.000031848165,0.6829936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9575377,0.0142636625,0.0038778,0.0054162536,0.00030345193,0.00018708078,0.000026176518,0.00002631368,0.018361636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956403,0.0027006394,0.00019149926,0.00028849667,0.00056409114,0.00061497785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99702364,0.002153656,0.00035142415,0.00015759932,0.0001591884,0.00015449079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005381711,0.00048443195,0.00052185036,0.0021418137,0.009916108,0.009772191,0.0009839897,0.0045631453,0.0035927114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00694395,0.00027043093,0.00026999685,0.0031040127,0.06562179,0.007980328,0.008872558,0.0058534364,0.00028939723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010781455,0.0000017787178,0.000042894295,0.00002219132,4.911265e-7,0.00009626535,0.014092707,0.000030643303,0.000037536225,0.9835398,0.00043045531,0.0017041788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008252973,0.000012825008,0.0007351647,0.0007239658,0.0000042861416,0.00031942702,0.03780985,0.00019565756,0.00017989236,0.78549385,0.1745004,0.000016420747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013767879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009843822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013767879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011432623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010384746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08294982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145217611","doi":"","title":"Conscientious Objection to Creating Same-Sex Unions: An International Analysis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Context (archaeology); Accommodation; Law; Political science; Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.02207339460264576,"score_gpt":0.3313607941634519,"score_spread":0.30928739956080614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145217611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49708813,0.0017318659,0.00083207415,0.008793917,0.00007737384,0.000062472966,0.00007077858,0.000007296279,0.49133602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994422,0.00071419356,0.00009775381,0.0005877099,0.000018021969,0.000019381012,0.000021580581,0.0000070311426,0.0041122935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99377537,0.0018303834,0.00014642096,0.00040293345,0.0010289124,0.002816012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99348056,0.0030108322,0.0013534875,0.00036526547,0.0010311279,0.0007588359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051151486,0.00024919523,0.00026601207,0.0033443943,0.010578077,0.006155535,0.0013414391,0.0018771653,0.008112629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010958048,0.00015345379,0.00040715176,0.0047304546,0.014898039,0.0035618998,0.0047056694,0.0036725437,0.00029002034],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004994848,0.00008585461,0.039623164,0.00012056271,0.000023507613,0.0015203466,0.18147919,0.0002747991,0.00026090667,0.75314105,0.0039185164,0.019502167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039726143,0.00009323336,0.13253969,0.0011608889,0.00011038124,0.00085046777,0.65322316,0.00062972953,0.00078431674,0.040384408,0.17011866,0.00006533526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13932443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16225332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13932443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011506034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060086143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27702695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W214726199","doi":"","title":"Coverage of Issues Related to Language, in Particular Language Rights and Language Policy, in the South African Print media/Mediadekking in Die Suid-Afrikaanse Gedrukte Media Oor Taalverwante Onderwerpe, in Besonder Taalregte En Taalbeleidskwessies","year":2006,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Literator","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Theology; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0061135216869519955,"score_gpt":0.2863898865395676,"score_spread":0.2802763648526156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W214726199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.959415,0.0007384975,0.00012434828,0.0027077545,0.000021803966,0.000042574346,0.0002914121,0.0000039171327,0.036654618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943566,0.0005411553,0.00006002558,0.00021979449,0.000023037725,0.000037666396,0.000069854104,0.0000040035316,0.004687845],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997251,0.0013005832,0.00023166617,0.00016737384,0.00061585,0.00043359352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97373044,0.016516112,0.006560343,0.0005080581,0.0017176775,0.0009673087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031238564,0.00012616477,0.00014748421,0.0025585906,0.002197139,0.0036964652,0.0003136048,0.000690737,0.017092744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020977026,0.000185021,0.00010001335,0.002784184,0.0025758408,0.0046294127,0.002392456,0.00089260534,0.0009779359],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022375702,0.000326255,0.32778126,0.0012857701,0.000026082584,0.002162648,0.5161748,0.0002532412,0.0049563004,0.03503799,0.0068993233,0.104872555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010450072,0.00012024192,0.5216966,0.0009229152,0.000018643434,0.0005608517,0.4169664,0.00023708877,0.002068651,0.002578549,0.05479192,0.000027686914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012717797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0141849555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017092744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020355666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05718088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147471715","doi":"","title":"Anti-Spam: A Comparative Appraisal of Canadian, European Union, and South African Regulatory Regimes","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European union; Cyberspace; Legislature; Business; Political science; International trade; Internet privacy; Public administration; The Internet; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.027755550380962713,"score_gpt":0.28485904287192165,"score_spread":0.25710349249095893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147471715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6085244,0.06771742,0.00062047096,0.027135346,0.00019631043,0.00024983136,0.0009626481,0.000031596148,0.294562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9721738,0.021050952,0.00037354275,0.001976796,0.000044383924,0.00004331676,0.00018767215,0.000012723182,0.004136792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895834,0.0012441754,0.00028132802,0.00043832007,0.005351113,0.003101663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9785917,0.0067874743,0.0029539,0.00029752668,0.009947826,0.0014216001],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078323055,0.00041609508,0.0007031196,0.017935403,0.015954323,0.008043538,0.001349345,0.001850159,0.0044470346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02062706,0.00035526446,0.00057851727,0.029493416,0.008384666,0.0022673146,0.002147745,0.0018298572,0.00020052063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012458317,0.00026547333,0.16785388,0.0056386054,0.0004646454,0.0019853106,0.17287418,0.0014868474,0.002917466,0.39466923,0.03357067,0.2170279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097452685,0.00017526049,0.64715123,0.0031044374,0.0004950397,0.00047407195,0.14184968,0.0006022231,0.0012845556,0.0048435857,0.19971201,0.00021042254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9542643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9839811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09551815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09551815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1127331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69303596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147639589","doi":"","title":"What is law and development","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Variety (cybernetics); Legislation; Law and economics; Political science; Value (mathematics); Dominance (genetics); Enforcement; Law and development; Field (mathematics); Law; Sociology; Development studies","score_opus":0.02689319132734295,"score_gpt":0.36665095635174516,"score_spread":0.3397577650244022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147639589","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036034738,0.058735806,0.0011113891,0.51829517,0.0065069087,0.000020781497,0.00031195683,0.00007864021,0.41133592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5807548,0.15675266,0.0022905432,0.07967424,0.012173942,0.000113589405,0.0005671882,0.00022773685,0.16744533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99558324,0.0020327535,0.00014236338,0.00044923963,0.0009830692,0.0008093462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99309254,0.0025209675,0.00054468925,0.0008399927,0.0015494946,0.0014522212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033931662,0.00025110753,0.000648165,0.0017741759,0.004690523,0.019901626,0.0007526012,0.0038316187,0.032062754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013206196,0.00020207548,0.0003335302,0.0034871753,0.015207311,0.013486028,0.0026802209,0.0038762912,0.003768497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009220055,0.000021904367,0.0008964578,0.0002801662,0.000014027461,0.000083658044,0.0031857493,0.000083713916,0.00005214682,0.8024797,0.14019492,0.052698284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029065525,0.0000060589546,0.0009583459,0.0010231896,0.0000044010394,0.000059433078,0.0027518752,0.0000475857,0.00003911569,0.12163946,0.8734591,0.000008443281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01949769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014792529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032062754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008123648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015625047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107260525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152101107","doi":"10.25071/1920-7336.21246","title":"Migration, Refugees, and Racism in South Africa","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Refuge Canada s Journal on Refuge","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Xenophobia; Refugee; Racism; Democracy; Political science; Civil society; Public policy; Criminology; Development economics; Value (mathematics); Political economy; Sociology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.015696091242721116,"score_gpt":0.2799128903618702,"score_spread":0.2642167991191491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152101107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78831965,0.019647345,0.00022401688,0.1314487,0.00036009608,0.00003667554,0.000043174594,0.000007164282,0.059913225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836399,0.008760893,0.000093185634,0.003338664,0.00008992489,0.00001542878,0.000008248403,0.0000036480344,0.004050113],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987344,0.0006875495,0.00005417103,0.00004385515,0.00010103538,0.00037894177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988017,0.0004403157,0.0003113485,0.000029241663,0.000078912446,0.00033844265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018280047,0.00020467525,0.00027741032,0.0014410486,0.011619192,0.0041625407,0.00028501396,0.0017186751,0.004912883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028580856,0.00017895867,0.00017420681,0.0017516261,0.008894974,0.002129144,0.005762522,0.0020739234,0.00013006605],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008684557,0.00014831414,0.06003825,0.0006491175,0.000027430386,0.009293573,0.6532383,0.00025488847,0.00092917343,0.20954189,0.014568332,0.051223893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019353716,0.000084822015,0.052757666,0.00115907,0.000014785274,0.0031182605,0.7891052,0.00009402794,0.000204149,0.01788559,0.13551241,0.00004465571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055289116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.104973555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055289116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00437105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059435563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10993463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158558054","doi":"10.1017/s0008197300000027","title":"Practice Directions and the Civil Procedure Rules","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Jurisdiction; Statute; Civil procedure; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.010753279426418435,"score_gpt":0.28814126681326285,"score_spread":0.2773879873868444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158558054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022650337,0.0048895343,0.05853812,0.16688937,0.0009601958,0.00032330918,0.000083991035,0.00010358855,0.7455615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.899079,0.0030899222,0.039599314,0.017110795,0.0007603206,0.0006653983,0.00008989905,0.000094650444,0.03951059],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94631934,0.031735912,0.0034243844,0.00459377,0.010437016,0.0034896503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9496989,0.02995719,0.0050650625,0.006270933,0.006583951,0.0024240206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03894026,0.00055097305,0.0005371639,0.002469419,0.008315504,0.012229933,0.0018900144,0.009290945,0.005563039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061203837,0.00081757404,0.00055731565,0.0022849534,0.08489487,0.01680401,0.007070661,0.013964152,0.0010193678],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.0674e-7,0.0000027410988,0.00003882829,0.000006642173,5.3919666e-7,0.00001469604,0.001069327,0.000025840833,0.0000149574225,0.9970139,0.0005200154,0.0012915846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023026705,0.000019273284,0.0003548289,0.00019074533,0.0000038497747,0.00012212241,0.002466591,0.00016685264,0.00012743488,0.8777412,0.118763454,0.000020651656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009568863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007458447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03894026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009247234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023332784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20593828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W21657429","doi":"","title":"A Promising Late Spring for Charter Damages: \"Ward v. Vancouver\"","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Jurisdiction; Compensation (psychology); Government (linguistics); Economic Justice; Statute; Psychology","score_opus":0.029380816644021833,"score_gpt":0.28704507100559423,"score_spread":0.2576642543615724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W21657429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31062636,0.0030337956,0.0027538224,0.15635791,0.003115099,0.0003945114,0.00050522626,0.00012988802,0.5230833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72884643,0.0010116004,0.0014865579,0.10799839,0.00034217938,0.00015169397,0.00014906912,0.000053962536,0.15996009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943335,0.00058966066,0.00016515589,0.000546771,0.0022794155,0.0020855623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99750984,0.00089549954,0.0001310394,0.00009180537,0.0006638054,0.0007080357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002565812,0.00040095326,0.00041326726,0.00098338,0.017835887,0.008339212,0.0021795824,0.012544289,0.005453173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0078425575,0.00075078284,0.00046167802,0.0010940671,0.0039650486,0.0016311558,0.0031409496,0.019810319,0.00064564345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002062295,0.00019920075,0.011172887,0.00017227077,0.000059640657,0.008336066,0.010829076,0.000756313,0.0058726743,0.7217513,0.20543617,0.03520825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018209855,0.00042827032,0.03357823,0.0005785488,0.00013175503,0.0020015421,0.021122357,0.0018977313,0.007332353,0.07443373,0.8578774,0.00043603053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4521326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8156207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5478674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017783348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027380731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89900184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168351882","doi":"","title":"From Equality Before the Law to the Equal Benefit of the Law: Social and Economic Rights in the Irish Constitution","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Irish; Social rights; Doctrine; Law; Political science; International human rights law; Human rights; Fundamental rights; Constitution; Convention; Social equality; Right to property","score_opus":0.02478059605225247,"score_gpt":0.3063622042283671,"score_spread":0.2815816081761146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168351882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022663627,0.0034487422,0.0060987663,0.08266251,0.0008086721,0.00003137366,0.00005963062,0.000015143441,0.88421154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8589385,0.004361011,0.004580865,0.027140936,0.0012779795,0.00014764075,0.0000812208,0.00007154182,0.10340031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942562,0.0020844028,0.00014462092,0.00045744653,0.0013858691,0.0016714804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980642,0.0011183758,0.00013716538,0.00018908849,0.00029806324,0.00019312065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053222124,0.0003812203,0.00042436164,0.001401064,0.0067058518,0.012308703,0.0012273588,0.0046415706,0.0068898466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009092488,0.00041763595,0.00067257776,0.0014266194,0.048379112,0.009174021,0.0076962626,0.009850689,0.0007689441],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040898176,0.0000029642438,0.00006795185,0.000008207942,0.0000011453163,0.000028323167,0.0011770471,0.00006468871,0.000017978182,0.9956483,0.0013187799,0.0016604204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028416924,0.000017590972,0.00076221494,0.0002190413,0.000009548162,0.00006369003,0.003494743,0.0001650729,0.00020334756,0.83916897,0.1558425,0.000024800484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04842422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059401363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04842422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014058644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014449367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10200304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169175884","doi":"","title":"The child's right against exploitation in the form of pornography on the Internet : a South African perspective","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Pornography; Child pornography; The Internet; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Advertising; Art; Law; Computer science; Business; World Wide Web; Visual arts","score_opus":0.01411834257981732,"score_gpt":0.25230835737505614,"score_spread":0.23819001479523882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169175884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2378042,0.10314636,0.001710024,0.24277976,0.001290549,0.00013291561,0.00015675146,0.000010756994,0.4129686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88839996,0.068511076,0.00067299226,0.0146740945,0.00064920424,0.000066239925,0.000021240412,0.000015619516,0.02698965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890506,0.00060526264,0.000054499305,0.000055550416,0.00008572178,0.00029378379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986267,0.0009788884,0.000169159,0.000024664876,0.00010484576,0.0000957511],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019869977,0.0003511881,0.00030941554,0.0010692567,0.006849299,0.003981493,0.00047132213,0.0036254781,0.005461289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022650494,0.00032907675,0.00018432405,0.0013308597,0.00862607,0.0037948862,0.0021319096,0.0044519203,0.00046874475],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003003447,0.00004799165,0.0017730886,0.0007089315,0.000008606931,0.0040180143,0.18194808,0.00012827416,0.0011452081,0.7879715,0.008426854,0.01379341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019961759,0.00010343809,0.01081242,0.0043699276,0.00004050192,0.0035081,0.22949369,0.00027089528,0.0010946083,0.07209594,0.67814124,0.000049255945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016858004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020344233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016858004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032964933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003965744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033519745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178913227","doi":"","title":"A guide to the Personal Property Security Act: The case of Malawi","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Personal property; Statutory law; Security interest; Law reform; Statute; Law; Legislature; Common law; Legislative history; Insolvency; Commission; Business; Political science; Property (philosophy)","score_opus":0.022917426676099244,"score_gpt":0.32659740174318375,"score_spread":0.3036799750670845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178913227","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029411746,0.15956283,0.0047819545,0.17340489,0.0028802939,0.00038094408,0.00053533266,0.00011976756,0.62892216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27588224,0.1322354,0.006220133,0.05547451,0.0013381544,0.00062818953,0.00035568478,0.00013029002,0.52773535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985561,0.0005610915,0.000076514785,0.000085471474,0.0003211494,0.00039960103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927765,0.00043653927,0.00008389351,0.000027428263,0.00009244538,0.00008214871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014202712,0.0006670325,0.00033195678,0.001573704,0.008817262,0.006041122,0.0013081185,0.006046416,0.0072798915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023974103,0.0005943383,0.0003292029,0.0022436546,0.006405484,0.008239043,0.004391703,0.006019286,0.0015090693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000100789,0.000053151416,0.0009485595,0.000248625,0.0000048645734,0.002115365,0.036910016,0.00022067323,0.00024715406,0.79912657,0.13340324,0.026711818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025010331,0.000012576423,0.0008613683,0.00046122193,0.0000026497673,0.00049354765,0.008475702,0.00008938126,0.000098301956,0.011604073,0.9778855,0.000013261958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07526137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1254424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07526137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009010184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008724443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14964658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181422939","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v8n4p185","title":"Challenges Posed on The New Mining Act and Its Regulations in Tanzania","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tanzania; Enforcement; Business; Corporate governance; Order (exchange); Scale (ratio); Eviction; Sustainable development; Indigenous; Law enforcement; Environmental planning; Law; Political science; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.09302691121749544,"score_gpt":0.34633160309594463,"score_spread":0.2533046918784492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181422939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6339638,0.010529111,0.0016300699,0.28170344,0.00101656,0.00017685216,0.00011769742,0.000041907515,0.0708206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96058726,0.002015765,0.0012559455,0.023430616,0.00020645253,0.000073482945,0.000027631708,0.000011543011,0.012391287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994311,0.0023543732,0.00043477782,0.00029085786,0.001248778,0.0013602981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880505,0.0071583516,0.0022696415,0.00028952092,0.0014374274,0.00079456606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009106587,0.00012947233,0.00019726194,0.0009089737,0.0064793956,0.0055023683,0.0009480141,0.0046111476,0.002148479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014007045,0.00038070878,0.00027260647,0.0009048855,0.0049871653,0.0018713769,0.002579239,0.0039370377,0.00017335625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014897631,0.00016540402,0.050725162,0.0006731932,0.00003936791,0.012383395,0.11949905,0.0022830034,0.0054299333,0.6950856,0.051979624,0.0615874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010047859,0.0003827417,0.16153064,0.0022580416,0.000106781976,0.0029328943,0.11977132,0.003122903,0.0029013427,0.039312888,0.6673216,0.00025833613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060795467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08855103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060795467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00852529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015048502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12088317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2182297336","doi":"","title":"CITY OF TORONTO BY-LAW No. 666-2014 To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Morningside Avenue at Tams Road. The Council of the City of Toronto enacts: 1. Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, is amended as follows: A. By inserting in Schedule XXIII (Prohibited Turns) in § 950-1322, the following in","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Geography; Transport engineering; Public administration; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.029734193614803,"score_gpt":0.2912621558612559,"score_spread":0.2615279622464529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2182297336","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038796132,0.001545967,0.0009061235,0.017652458,0.003432135,0.00056375493,0.03218676,0.0006669532,0.9391662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012058696,0.00055725593,0.0006391341,0.005580651,0.00021438242,0.00019596869,0.005229579,0.0002409199,0.97528344],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967204,0.00015633604,0.00016115475,0.00032682443,0.0016908931,0.00094448554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99363697,0.0004902804,0.00021491986,0.00038875637,0.004500523,0.00076862186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012644671,0.00079239113,0.0005357085,0.0010283289,0.009345417,0.0063558295,0.0016728091,0.0061219367,0.15727426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006290766,0.000987656,0.00047839116,0.0021001466,0.0015412553,0.0016529165,0.0014621783,0.004338055,0.0613081],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015994245,0.000008933494,0.00042117471,0.00004908313,0.0000022288928,0.000047231064,0.00046546067,0.00003917001,0.000123504,0.020218834,0.97634524,0.002263098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000099709905,0.0000053640492,0.0027120458,0.000059652004,0.000005135794,0.000017662822,0.0003573491,0.00004894315,0.00013333837,0.00035523885,0.9962804,0.0000148981335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93698347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9779245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15727426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035904042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07198592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52613485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2182656146","doi":"","title":"To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 195, Purchasing, on an interim basis to authorize standing committees of Council to increase the award authority of the Bid Committee in cases of emergency.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interim; Purchasing; Public administration; Law; Code (set theory); Political science; Business; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Marketing; Programming language","score_opus":0.14244438071259583,"score_gpt":0.38152805539877455,"score_spread":0.23908367468617872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2182656146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014847911,0.003177481,0.0030117345,0.25793803,0.021540666,0.0015700988,0.009308615,0.0011575001,0.687448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037339963,0.0011484716,0.0025938358,0.15040655,0.0016833819,0.0005225094,0.0027414819,0.00041125188,0.8031526],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99464685,0.00032209777,0.00031760376,0.00031504684,0.002691814,0.0017065072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879494,0.0013339401,0.00057044916,0.00056674826,0.0080199605,0.0015595094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019746227,0.0006084313,0.00046812097,0.0011118037,0.008551628,0.00457715,0.0020868806,0.016050287,0.03157555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015312464,0.00085992663,0.00058761466,0.0015111816,0.0018354729,0.0017540432,0.001670333,0.009393184,0.015143858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019747347,0.000029716177,0.0009800075,0.00005162502,0.000004302435,0.00014338162,0.0008021865,0.0000636266,0.00038951088,0.015753662,0.97774065,0.0040216455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002646013,0.000016199157,0.007849836,0.000073926865,0.000010155307,0.000051325373,0.00081626425,0.00009762497,0.00030965294,0.0010451665,0.98966706,0.000036319998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78259087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9265991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21740913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017258719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06516881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43737894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2183102720","doi":"","title":"To appoint Valerie L. Jepson as Integrity Commissioner under section 158 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006. Whereas under section 158 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 the City of Toronto shall appoint an Integrity Commissioner;","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); History; Advertising; Business","score_opus":0.03873836191851536,"score_gpt":0.3249845917564282,"score_spread":0.2862462298379128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2183102720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009291665,0.004596195,0.0011819017,0.45337236,0.0108862985,0.00036276068,0.0010878925,0.00026837623,0.51895255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03808189,0.0011031609,0.0006903527,0.12728383,0.0007219798,0.000112917565,0.00028397696,0.00011328084,0.8316086],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99637526,0.0004017433,0.00015752416,0.0005018593,0.0011414152,0.001422181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99179006,0.0014908257,0.00045982958,0.00035578245,0.0039901817,0.0019133986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021961306,0.0006167035,0.00048557753,0.0005223859,0.012583455,0.0068036187,0.0015298147,0.016041161,0.063511185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011262929,0.0006719816,0.00038340874,0.0006641608,0.0032485502,0.002946188,0.0024976318,0.009773607,0.021903496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002051665,0.000014347346,0.0008344068,0.000050114708,0.0000033738236,0.000159652,0.0023384888,0.000033352157,0.00031218928,0.035854656,0.9569457,0.003433269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014446573,0.000012283094,0.0023373773,0.000078502904,0.000006360206,0.00007528255,0.003118651,0.00005810853,0.00026269152,0.0012649372,0.9927448,0.000026488884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5231457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77024585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47685432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013069057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040753733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95932525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2183305769","doi":"","title":"CITY OF TORONTO BY-LAW No. 327-2015 To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, respecting St. Helen's Avenue. The Toronto and East York Community Council enacts: 1. Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, is amended as follows:","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.12468321781563291,"score_gpt":0.3464252873811255,"score_spread":0.22174206956549258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2183305769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006817172,0.002099523,0.0010356252,0.030617103,0.0059574065,0.0009015233,0.03275562,0.0009995116,0.91881657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019590665,0.0005702773,0.0007762519,0.010690135,0.0003895895,0.00033015315,0.0062731695,0.00029954017,0.9610802],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99580836,0.00022958465,0.00025885965,0.00035188597,0.002160318,0.001191011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990311,0.0010025792,0.00026906043,0.0005727936,0.006799511,0.0010451237],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018399111,0.0007997413,0.00058651075,0.0010922878,0.010306029,0.0063877,0.0019869797,0.009047159,0.12108933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009912861,0.0010185892,0.00051381445,0.002217398,0.0018953697,0.0017671089,0.0018519326,0.005076758,0.056457154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020221614,0.000011000627,0.0004994342,0.00005581589,0.000002468325,0.000063548665,0.00073224504,0.000044891516,0.00013974022,0.01733171,0.9789533,0.0021455388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015670837,0.000008997271,0.0035368484,0.00009468929,0.000007170527,0.000028631195,0.00066726736,0.00006150348,0.00017276111,0.00043439947,0.994949,0.000023074608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9165123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97023374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87891066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036362275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0727858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4050842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2184081005","doi":"","title":"BY-LAW No. 972-2013 To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Lawrence Avenue West at William R. Allen Road. The Council of the City of Toronto enacts: 1. Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, is amended as follows: A. By inserting in Schedule XXIV (Compulsory Turns) in § 950-1323, the following in","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transport engineering; Law; Code (set theory); Sociology; Civil engineering; Political science; Engineering; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.03896630338358851,"score_gpt":0.29065449523689374,"score_spread":0.2516881918533052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2184081005","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003317578,0.0012171653,0.0011850564,0.017116077,0.0030217608,0.0010919608,0.029253418,0.0009368088,0.94286025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010129154,0.0004595006,0.0007589569,0.012233243,0.0002670978,0.00032004333,0.005945974,0.0003539477,0.969532],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944576,0.00026532297,0.00026991684,0.00043501097,0.0031582746,0.0014138155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893757,0.0009159941,0.00027126152,0.0005633377,0.008196108,0.00067765114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00231444,0.00084060896,0.00063775294,0.0011524832,0.007871205,0.006056213,0.0022974855,0.008016171,0.16418481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011314341,0.0010347177,0.00053329696,0.0021910039,0.001764102,0.0019806374,0.0016630722,0.0058711213,0.11895222],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021269463,0.000020198186,0.00039703655,0.000060694467,0.0000026491373,0.00004212551,0.00048039822,0.00003260977,0.00021454637,0.018059097,0.977985,0.0026843438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017992075,0.00000939942,0.0029856716,0.00010298627,0.0000073487727,0.000026933914,0.0003364225,0.000050793748,0.0002083497,0.000553106,0.9956807,0.00002039246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83855104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.931995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16418481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025916737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05725776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54925287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2185191513","doi":"","title":"WHEREAS Council of the City of Toronto has provided adequate information to the public and has held at least one public meeting in accordance with the Planning Act; The Council of the City of Toronto HEREBY ENACTS as follows: 1. Notwithstanding Article XIII Section 320-57 and 320-58 of the Etobicoke Zoning Code,","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public administration; Town council; Public information; Political science","score_opus":0.07325185141802981,"score_gpt":0.2647767199758875,"score_spread":0.19152486855785766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2185191513","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034451947,0.0029258353,0.0017922255,0.1388125,0.004411463,0.00028147092,0.008850113,0.00033789605,0.8081366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.124381244,0.001717193,0.0017630974,0.012523682,0.0004933001,0.00010068066,0.0015670608,0.000121932404,0.85733175],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974953,0.00023605383,0.000105872576,0.00018705246,0.001002316,0.0009734663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970805,0.0006753278,0.0002243709,0.00020150297,0.0012279107,0.00059031125],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010609814,0.00038248146,0.0003084136,0.0005867763,0.00836586,0.0047038696,0.0011662273,0.005081597,0.04392686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055748844,0.0003821121,0.00018294273,0.0014922447,0.0021381462,0.0012003742,0.0015523629,0.0033394485,0.006992778],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055104854,0.000020988897,0.003192248,0.00019497337,0.000008341007,0.0002972578,0.006213802,0.0000929793,0.0011866878,0.13795169,0.8369412,0.01384471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006231335,0.0000074222557,0.00800509,0.000033633154,0.000008339123,0.00003150068,0.001333398,0.00007319742,0.00039169355,0.0006344229,0.98945504,0.000020051562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8648193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97001016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95607316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011672188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041811403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27195358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2185197477","doi":"","title":"BY-LAW No. 651-2008 To appoint Geri Sanson as Integrity Commissioner under section 158 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006. WHEREAS under section 158 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 the City of Toronto shall appoint an Integrity Commissioner;","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Law; Political science; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.03868767560021912,"score_gpt":0.31510464982921577,"score_spread":0.27641697422899664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2185197477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055793254,0.0016899171,0.00089736015,0.040191848,0.0021429888,0.0006706479,0.0071148304,0.0005370783,0.94117606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017193869,0.0004715203,0.00077112264,0.033729613,0.0003126681,0.00031856532,0.0015517945,0.00023542573,0.94541544],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955344,0.00044022175,0.0003525704,0.00056222244,0.0018971162,0.0012133933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915856,0.0022047043,0.00039854858,0.0007137359,0.0045455582,0.000551892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034920007,0.00084544683,0.0007397086,0.0008299363,0.007431372,0.0069458964,0.0018645765,0.0172838,0.104418315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014339517,0.0009986687,0.0005027058,0.0012746316,0.002378083,0.0030202672,0.0021134366,0.008781333,0.073260374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048261227,0.000037798072,0.00088631624,0.000089238165,0.0000047707495,0.00012984981,0.0015833954,0.00005382204,0.0004244318,0.06735798,0.9249281,0.004456055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033471606,0.000017501734,0.0026831336,0.00017959485,0.000008924778,0.000064617285,0.0006374749,0.00006999145,0.00027316084,0.001518783,0.9944891,0.00002423978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35198098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.582121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.648019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0126502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02248121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69986445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2185200959","doi":"","title":"Concerns from a European user-empowerment perspective relating to Internet content","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Repository of the University of Namur","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Empowerment; Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Political science; Public administration; Content (measure theory); Intervention (counseling); Public relations; Public economics; World Wide Web; Computer science; Economics; Law; Psychology; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03422837001450475,"score_gpt":0.26044619515914963,"score_spread":0.2262178251446449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2185200959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065836474,0.009643197,0.0144215645,0.35052297,0.0012756333,0.00006130857,0.000076141434,0.00006045577,0.5581023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88881564,0.004695384,0.0025166383,0.05672371,0.0013497534,0.00015781494,0.00006577595,0.00010615737,0.045569215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831771,0.010618762,0.00043733127,0.0013239059,0.0023406725,0.002102173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850802,0.011376534,0.00070221693,0.00081743574,0.0010385222,0.0009850664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020140257,0.00050591666,0.0004717618,0.0019782297,0.005951388,0.016124375,0.0015292721,0.012592423,0.009798809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018950043,0.00028244147,0.0006258493,0.0023062034,0.02458365,0.022121869,0.009507938,0.007933692,0.000934074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019801333,0.000026853155,0.00061815407,0.00003970873,0.000005256001,0.00027875783,0.020570531,0.00007856362,0.00015587138,0.9652983,0.0043013985,0.0086069945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027393176,0.00006944371,0.0030964687,0.00058850605,0.0000145614695,0.0010758357,0.03869248,0.0005173882,0.0007034728,0.52284324,0.43231976,0.00005145644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035762037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027196463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020140257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038627356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027109461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10651314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2189586175","doi":"","title":"Whereas authority is given to the Council of the City of Toronto by Section 34 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended, to pass this By-law; and Whereas the Council of the City of Toronto has provided adequate information to the public and has held at least one public meeting in accordance with the Planning Act; and","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Law; Political science; Public administration; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.061413069638402595,"score_gpt":0.2662147458642883,"score_spread":0.2048016762258857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2189586175","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018463343,0.0054038377,0.0023396485,0.17146222,0.006739402,0.0002415894,0.005331767,0.0003407007,0.7896775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14049341,0.0024050195,0.0032621117,0.04330891,0.001223604,0.00021777234,0.0019023609,0.00020085523,0.806986],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99369437,0.0006783353,0.00034052157,0.0005559976,0.0024596406,0.0022710848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938134,0.0011214715,0.00044912923,0.00056940987,0.003070263,0.0009762176],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026058943,0.0005760204,0.0005234248,0.00088644825,0.00873677,0.0063098837,0.0016284008,0.007242025,0.022080636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010146916,0.00060265017,0.00047704013,0.0019427717,0.0050282422,0.0017133655,0.002050969,0.006301954,0.0076214587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004874254,0.000016652913,0.001211728,0.00015316362,0.000012459664,0.00016740292,0.0041921274,0.00011613069,0.0007457985,0.25673652,0.7293798,0.007219471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009287032,0.000009869914,0.0059744027,0.000056662557,0.000012187495,0.000042278283,0.0010598802,0.00007419405,0.00032489558,0.0021540346,0.99025327,0.000029073182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86904365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95808125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97791934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021854341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06915183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2634551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2190280036","doi":"","title":"Against the Backdrop of Dignity and Equality, The Non-Absoluteness of Property Rights","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jotwell: The Journal of Things We Like","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Property rights; Law; Property (philosophy); Democracy; Political science; Constitution; Property law; Sociology; Human rights; Law and economics; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.05364131249292708,"score_gpt":0.31590508144679913,"score_spread":0.26226376895387205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2190280036","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045240346,0.016026763,0.055415567,0.19825074,0.002098516,0.00009686516,0.00016670529,0.00009433151,0.6826101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93831307,0.0044928445,0.009336405,0.015116792,0.0011522096,0.00015268802,0.00006224742,0.0000857124,0.03128798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872679,0.005637051,0.0006210823,0.0018129977,0.0032926851,0.0013683339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99244666,0.00382041,0.0008520407,0.0013995746,0.0009319096,0.0005493303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010130555,0.0004969661,0.0008717344,0.0012919564,0.00867624,0.0121443495,0.0016023162,0.0046603205,0.0067879837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014899398,0.00037034086,0.00045909407,0.0013015034,0.1035716,0.017030727,0.009848484,0.008857819,0.00093121704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002700143,0.0000031741724,0.00006764206,0.000022631944,0.0000026380321,0.000021246962,0.0016442237,0.000026913187,0.00009812641,0.9951441,0.0010008946,0.0019657472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008289403,0.000021031225,0.0003482646,0.00019429745,0.00000600533,0.00013507581,0.0026992026,0.000074195435,0.00033106285,0.8996541,0.09651305,0.000015453581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061080754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055634473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0121443495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056072758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008520184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05357611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2192161463","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v18i3.08","title":"A Critical Appraisal of Western Cape Forum for Intellectual Disability v Government of the Republic of South Africa 2011 5 SA 87 (WCC)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Constitution; Constitutionalism; Law; Perception; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.03146304632993881,"score_gpt":0.31708016510968756,"score_spread":0.28561711877974877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2192161463","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0115276305,0.035361644,0.0005222314,0.7661123,0.015166025,0.00043856073,0.00036326892,0.000048230846,0.17046008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1222713,0.014851735,0.0005971269,0.7961815,0.0060139946,0.00079868454,0.00012026727,0.00006615479,0.059099253],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9796475,0.006109687,0.0012254698,0.0016713424,0.0060429713,0.0053029787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97229034,0.019862624,0.0014107028,0.0006443773,0.0043698684,0.001422056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01774652,0.00148596,0.0010250425,0.0042657303,0.020982966,0.017630294,0.004091618,0.049621865,0.0052461005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04840231,0.0015926454,0.0020212654,0.0036868681,0.016558968,0.0059815296,0.004265621,0.034214485,0.0011765979],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004825525,0.000044129993,0.0007754171,0.0007641154,0.000042230666,0.0021819456,0.017810127,0.00022503515,0.00048548434,0.38846213,0.57897145,0.010189726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004850979,0.00005531661,0.0044487165,0.0057666055,0.000074538504,0.0002722265,0.01652697,0.00020346245,0.0005551776,0.018921299,0.9529458,0.00018135714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28597295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33922774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28597295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028841354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058165282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5686168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2198549152","doi":"","title":"Inclusive Interpretations: Social Rights and Judicial Accountability","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; International human rights law; Legitimacy; Fundamental rights; Social rights; Law; Reservation of rights; Right to property; Politics; Charter; Obligation; Linguistic rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.006517283529891264,"score_gpt":0.31276639483288304,"score_spread":0.30624911130299176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2198549152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0778088,0.0027965643,0.012033323,0.060477585,0.0004421723,0.00022803101,0.00012530749,0.00009703683,0.84599113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9389756,0.0013885134,0.00442756,0.0049483976,0.000111932895,0.0001629265,0.00004475482,0.00005420801,0.049886115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9732843,0.007556062,0.00054159696,0.0015655142,0.008876841,0.008175757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875136,0.0068371845,0.00067003234,0.0007103787,0.0031660353,0.0011027635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011307777,0.00076217327,0.00082906167,0.0028530618,0.048622444,0.018558685,0.004053148,0.008097666,0.006404152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021787878,0.00054929405,0.00078933814,0.0046902313,0.04961501,0.0068334825,0.009274587,0.009761477,0.00037200924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005744525,0.000011314397,0.0005035419,0.000019074583,0.0000034017532,0.00040439103,0.019742958,0.00032377578,0.00006342358,0.97112566,0.0033166972,0.0044799764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064147054,0.000027196304,0.0045924983,0.00053590076,0.0000626489,0.00036322413,0.07796585,0.0033711293,0.000742969,0.56967026,0.34245127,0.00015285927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9675024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9825386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9675024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17109616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22655232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96141094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2210039053","doi":"","title":"The New Wall of Separation: Permitting Diversity, Restricting Competition","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Jurisprudence; Legitimacy; Legislature; State (computer science); Legal pluralism; Legal profession; Legal realism; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01517884994801499,"score_gpt":0.3124879887257448,"score_spread":0.2973091387777298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2210039053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1042777,0.011200332,0.050400354,0.13877383,0.0024777593,0.00007995802,0.00006228148,0.00012534998,0.69260246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9361429,0.0019594757,0.0063191387,0.01775783,0.000806987,0.0001419901,0.00003583815,0.0001118695,0.036723934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895593,0.005096399,0.00025579165,0.0011391868,0.0022133705,0.0017359694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994776,0.0020922706,0.0004519936,0.00091203395,0.00050370663,0.0012639185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074106148,0.00036922758,0.0006355443,0.0012166731,0.011107207,0.015593087,0.0017470439,0.005226902,0.006741863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013195574,0.00039322698,0.0006507089,0.0010546388,0.054982554,0.01730835,0.017292615,0.010206193,0.00087145285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017660352,0.0000083132045,0.00017589447,0.00001391743,0.0000023734194,0.000037428563,0.0025703213,0.00008781201,0.00011633789,0.9887011,0.0028143667,0.005454291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040106555,0.000051597934,0.0005824348,0.00021148213,0.000011832727,0.00015585446,0.0070898593,0.0004931058,0.00031757215,0.8378192,0.153197,0.000029950379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006979847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011481735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015593087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00626918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008354029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04548633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2214132031","doi":"","title":"Towards the application of the precautionary principle in South African law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review = Stellenbosch Regstydskrif","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Precautionary principle; Sustainable development; Legislation; Environmental law; Political science; Law and economics; Scale (ratio); Law; Business; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.060024578047306563,"score_gpt":0.34380490210830666,"score_spread":0.2837803240610001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2214132031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034898087,0.12230001,0.021087337,0.27351904,0.001596977,0.00022017473,0.000067686036,0.000031275966,0.5462795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84650254,0.05139112,0.011277021,0.046319295,0.0013295196,0.00039891026,0.00003809849,0.00004239644,0.042701073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99163604,0.005051392,0.0004256681,0.0006401807,0.0013014053,0.0009453326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940638,0.0044689756,0.00047072387,0.0002721967,0.0005795261,0.00014494125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014275418,0.0004630871,0.0005480489,0.0029372745,0.0074173943,0.008563494,0.0010570533,0.0083199395,0.0027629407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01587327,0.00054998824,0.0005486131,0.0022497505,0.032960124,0.007890185,0.005202498,0.010321093,0.0004902128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012636744,0.0000029272849,0.00004727274,0.00003528386,0.0000011090342,0.00008628852,0.0017430388,0.000073348216,0.000054562683,0.9951414,0.0010062127,0.0018073557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018121082,0.000020673975,0.0010114595,0.001730915,0.000010458251,0.00027744536,0.0042335754,0.00036395533,0.0003438175,0.6607237,0.33123854,0.000027437192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025787806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017655633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025787806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010444062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016015308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07577729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2219214420","doi":"","title":"Expanding Constitutional 'Dialogue': A Lesson from South Africa","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Thursday; Constitution; Charter; Ceremony; Minor (academic); Political science; Law; Geography; Theology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04538617068798758,"score_gpt":0.290990455857946,"score_spread":0.2456042851699584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2219214420","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049708866,0.039438426,0.004579679,0.48986563,0.0015688282,0.0001282027,0.00005601925,0.00005742104,0.4145969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89668727,0.0149798095,0.00277819,0.05417501,0.00061841734,0.00021569381,0.000031413165,0.00016033207,0.030353885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991026,0.005232574,0.00020138147,0.000471651,0.000783908,0.0022844572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906371,0.0065873163,0.0003559742,0.00046489126,0.0007198454,0.001234911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013662258,0.00064795814,0.00069220486,0.0015521063,0.02790373,0.013360383,0.0018086091,0.0071941316,0.009529378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017980905,0.0004917554,0.00049888436,0.0018249413,0.031064698,0.019584252,0.016176457,0.01248004,0.00068568316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034359273,0.000026664875,0.0002840185,0.00023559752,0.000009313237,0.00075789494,0.20119059,0.00011024093,0.00038798107,0.7637158,0.015275737,0.01797174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005495374,0.000025871144,0.0010998204,0.0017146242,0.00001360896,0.00030329806,0.124107614,0.00014091884,0.00037382302,0.21249768,0.65963376,0.00003405186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08362316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09632063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08362316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021314986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027244676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16627288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2221719150","doi":"10.29173/alr1286","title":"Through the Looking Glass: Mediator Conceptions of Philosophy, Process and Power","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Settlement (finance); Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Power (physics); Mediator; Party-directed mediation; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Alternative dispute resolution; Law; Public relations; Psychology; Social psychology; Business; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.022683630246883364,"score_gpt":0.34332485832182946,"score_spread":0.3206412280749461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2221719150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16734912,0.0144955665,0.14888951,0.09619784,0.00038109577,0.00024221935,0.00006687619,0.0001932202,0.57218456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98400474,0.0011450823,0.005571765,0.0012584554,0.000044779354,0.00006607529,0.000010599272,0.000033595745,0.0078649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98778987,0.008956647,0.00020004621,0.000752242,0.0014662867,0.0008349536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99583364,0.0025790483,0.00043565128,0.00040332295,0.00037306183,0.0003752184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01222251,0.0004596335,0.00047116246,0.0022889944,0.008208141,0.014563049,0.0019325458,0.0040350123,0.0043573272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009458012,0.0004461567,0.000565075,0.0018150546,0.06605669,0.019036513,0.0058052177,0.0055784993,0.00042824537],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057343977,0.000004537528,0.00017923191,0.000010669148,0.0000018094349,0.000035620884,0.014387173,0.000048645048,0.000049285532,0.98390996,0.00017512476,0.0011920198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028985949,0.000027462902,0.0005636922,0.00011881973,0.000010205181,0.00010060287,0.023601161,0.0007410283,0.00019400977,0.9442271,0.030369604,0.00001733716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019192308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012641573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019192308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01152577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010570393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083625674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2225086936","doi":"10.5623/cig2012-041","title":"Boundary Dispute Resolution: A Comparison of Ontario’s <i>Boundaries Act</i> and <i>Surveys Act</i> as Solutions for Municipal Roads","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GEOMATICA","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Barrie Urology Group","funders":"","keywords":"Boundary (topology); Statutory law; Context (archaeology); Dispute resolution; Process (computing); Political science; Public administration; Law; Business; Law and economics; Geography; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.053986309426007247,"score_gpt":0.34688122934389726,"score_spread":0.29289491991789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2225086936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43077737,0.0017958857,0.001938988,0.031144451,0.00029765163,0.0008570703,0.0011121649,0.000054666554,0.53202176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96023995,0.0010295627,0.0018364025,0.0039413124,0.00003808941,0.00027825183,0.00051609386,0.000041625535,0.032078736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9726116,0.005664337,0.0010703539,0.0008831005,0.01463601,0.0051344996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9490325,0.023187397,0.003657112,0.0020694097,0.017633054,0.0044204826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018387211,0.00018927654,0.00047838895,0.0035620283,0.017644297,0.012973849,0.0031191467,0.0052233087,0.007993252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06998882,0.0005821133,0.00071974524,0.0074642175,0.008595211,0.004875966,0.004365639,0.004641337,0.0005306865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006356491,0.00061143684,0.10026006,0.00079800136,0.00018148671,0.0010993903,0.16334993,0.0034172095,0.0009917294,0.5350396,0.10481854,0.08879699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026048545,0.00021450625,0.30864006,0.00088144786,0.00027865637,0.00023158114,0.30088976,0.002793189,0.0010303059,0.0120212,0.37259078,0.00016813217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9904615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8966989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10330113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17359197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74950564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2225304967","doi":"","title":"Protecting Survivors of Domestic Violence within the Insurance Regime: Opportunities to Seek Termination or Variation of Insurance Contracts","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficiary; Insurance policy; Business; Legislation; Harm; Casualty insurance; Liability insurance; Actuarial science; Incentive; Law; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.028573178201582877,"score_gpt":0.2951715519902165,"score_spread":0.2665983737886336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2225304967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66925436,0.0021049962,0.005193162,0.048667163,0.0002948379,0.00019734436,0.000093412884,0.000097643824,0.2740971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96546805,0.00097034447,0.0014667191,0.007777998,0.00014233014,0.00011106513,0.00004899271,0.000016306276,0.02399818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974995,0.0007481249,0.00010969563,0.00016227987,0.00042458557,0.0010556638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959848,0.0014499018,0.00052728597,0.00052065507,0.00044588686,0.0010715391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034759324,0.00015148357,0.00018625453,0.00058910664,0.005041375,0.0032099506,0.0010556716,0.0025408005,0.004927591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0093716765,0.00023247549,0.00031025833,0.000387451,0.0037670273,0.0023421985,0.0052831178,0.003345755,0.0004545063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026037556,0.00057089125,0.13473721,0.00019910715,0.00004294382,0.0052388255,0.12132134,0.00071418635,0.007172353,0.43787646,0.041024104,0.2508422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009714942,0.0010560602,0.12550798,0.0028194173,0.00020528675,0.005886674,0.16573653,0.002028004,0.004458468,0.07245131,0.61958766,0.00016542547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031264994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09853665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031264994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020642213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012457171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062166035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2226823929","doi":"10.1080/02587203.2000.11827607","title":"The State as Trustee of Land","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal on Human Rights","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Law; State (computer science); Plaintiff; Constitution; Doctrine; Common law; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Trust law","score_opus":0.022867181371909424,"score_gpt":0.31622755676574815,"score_spread":0.29336037539383875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2226823929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21273598,0.005027541,0.011134627,0.03320887,0.00031055076,0.00005203666,0.000050007096,0.00007202128,0.73740834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9694798,0.0012226454,0.00044018344,0.00057228055,0.000041372783,0.000011849194,0.000008372238,0.000010070619,0.028213426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857426,0.00039297834,0.00008632564,0.0001468897,0.0003579486,0.000441631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985512,0.0006194379,0.0002189946,0.00019164346,0.00019165607,0.00022707447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011282531,0.00009748849,0.00019256432,0.0006550218,0.00440648,0.006677238,0.00044830405,0.0017965176,0.00558567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038740842,0.00024384935,0.00020122525,0.0008419376,0.008504091,0.0050716614,0.004495374,0.002300698,0.00047738495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055165083,0.00000438404,0.0012263797,0.000018314035,0.0000024209005,0.00020912901,0.007273824,0.000111194335,0.00024191558,0.9833046,0.0011381202,0.00646428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014294736,0.00007654636,0.0063690166,0.0005632541,0.00005470036,0.0013250334,0.02326124,0.0017114767,0.0015834899,0.38112327,0.5838711,0.00004662076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018161062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02915928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018161062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048693507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056890515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0361107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2234647739","doi":"","title":"Nasiebou in 'n eenheidstaat versus die toekenning van groepregte : diskoerse oor die akkommodering van diversiteit met spesifieke verwysing na Afrika en Suid-Afrika : geesteswetenskappe","year":2014,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Litnet Akademies : 'n Joernaal vir die Geesteswetenskappe, Natuurwetenskappe, Regte en Godsdienswetenskappe","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021476067480476143,"score_gpt":0.28640158692246376,"score_spread":0.2649255194419876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2234647739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07968833,0.018413829,0.0067815245,0.080399096,0.001898211,0.00004633336,0.00033158326,0.00010686864,0.81233424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73990905,0.010571254,0.0023275798,0.006785446,0.00050685235,0.00009644675,0.0002525772,0.0004587135,0.23909211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953922,0.002125532,0.00014573328,0.0006300317,0.00092775206,0.0007787235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99611,0.002188675,0.0003454914,0.00042781743,0.00049193023,0.0004360295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004456058,0.0004913634,0.00046930675,0.0011894901,0.008504308,0.01634992,0.0011471376,0.0023841034,0.022964517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008774637,0.00040267713,0.00047273384,0.0017996347,0.014105362,0.009801382,0.0065608793,0.00568828,0.0033604363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000838893,0.000030032677,0.0018909372,0.00023858578,0.000014286302,0.00032726445,0.19201027,0.00014333117,0.0005571632,0.730034,0.039790325,0.034879886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011742251,0.000018121053,0.0036497784,0.0004170844,0.000016752809,0.00017863835,0.082570314,0.00015633805,0.000690564,0.058432374,0.8538212,0.000037171136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05294139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.093701296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05294139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010573915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074521634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10526645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2235259443","doi":"10.7202/1100727ar","title":"DE L’ANC À LA CONSTITUTION SUD-AFRICAINE : CONTINUITÉ OU RUPTURE DANS LA PROTECTION DES DROITS FONDAMENTAUX ?","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021290258458733807,"score_gpt":0.29178877516789653,"score_spread":0.2704985167091627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2235259443","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43164492,0.015689686,0.002769312,0.05184813,0.0007608131,0.000044899898,0.00013891663,0.000027119104,0.4970763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97193694,0.0024005843,0.00044799852,0.0014192356,0.00009026727,0.000018015426,0.000023591228,0.000013448595,0.023649925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986205,0.00052747276,0.000028653274,0.0001834181,0.00013048633,0.0005094559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901664,0.0002714197,0.00021677182,0.00011049502,0.00015337685,0.00023130498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018582853,0.00024681436,0.0002077438,0.0007113605,0.007700521,0.005010132,0.0005514922,0.0012811206,0.008122404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034544608,0.00017199168,0.00014468789,0.0010013946,0.011990974,0.0037304282,0.0033879394,0.002686223,0.00051608926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006160683,0.000033017423,0.008734633,0.000081939834,0.0000145248605,0.0007573193,0.102068484,0.00012459958,0.0007643491,0.83541155,0.004798945,0.047149032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021496126,0.000059777783,0.036713365,0.0008596212,0.000024005169,0.0008073196,0.12247739,0.0002166397,0.0006526112,0.09498632,0.74313265,0.000048757764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052085422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08342256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052085422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005883765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00591743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1035645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2239920060","doi":"","title":"Franchisees as Consumers: The South African Example","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Promotion (chess); Legislation; Distribution (mathematics); Intellectual property; Entrepreneurship; Franchise; Investment (military); Goods and services; Globe; Small business; Marketing; Commerce; Market economy; International trade; Economics; Finance; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.032983879553609846,"score_gpt":0.3012949561335534,"score_spread":0.2683110765799436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2239920060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20874895,0.0071990537,0.0012454897,0.057985872,0.00041678597,0.00009499728,0.000090634254,0.000018210643,0.72419995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83321285,0.010463893,0.0009426552,0.0071343128,0.00016480454,0.000061220904,0.000034504083,0.00003407086,0.14795175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921155,0.00034637415,0.000013082724,0.000044208336,0.00009758059,0.00028717367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938774,0.00029638928,0.000059743805,0.00003752882,0.0000849688,0.00013373385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013133972,0.00031730966,0.00015898162,0.0008718399,0.013141521,0.004535176,0.00038529042,0.0027392583,0.016418103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016874984,0.00022267226,0.0002512553,0.0014205289,0.004299986,0.0052379346,0.0036463041,0.0033499715,0.0012749339],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006378682,0.00008695598,0.004140772,0.00015416161,0.000006533034,0.0036486867,0.19669078,0.00004943931,0.00058702764,0.72991633,0.024373615,0.040281843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016115422,0.000028711425,0.005499634,0.0003935253,0.000010721004,0.0011284958,0.1496036,0.00016873014,0.00030913972,0.018853663,0.8239675,0.000020259351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028698238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057638522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028698238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030776644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027499408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057062387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241121537","doi":"","title":"'n Kritiek op 'n normatiewe vergelyking van die 2003- en 2011-weergawes van die South African Languages Bill aan die hand van sosiolinguistiese beginsels van taalwetgewing : geesteswetenskappe","year":2012,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Litnet Akademies : 'n Joernaal vir die Geesteswetenskappe, Natuurwetenskappe, Regte en Godsdienswetenskappe","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01815445649468825,"score_gpt":0.28544391165623206,"score_spread":0.2672894551615438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241121537","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42139974,0.007928372,0.0019180404,0.08264661,0.0009131355,0.00015224035,0.0014264451,0.000064695785,0.48355067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8382196,0.002574487,0.0007885506,0.0043772953,0.00007052331,0.00014198157,0.00048263874,0.000096537915,0.15324835],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977398,0.00060330133,0.00009915095,0.00023349492,0.0005450048,0.0007791935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984895,0.0004484963,0.00017977676,0.00012488809,0.0004196963,0.0003376345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024503854,0.00027318668,0.00022751425,0.00059845916,0.006683993,0.004458684,0.0005602316,0.0011482544,0.024091763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039225216,0.00033082068,0.00022599631,0.0014923221,0.0039045934,0.0031323319,0.0036796958,0.003246391,0.0023723354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021867336,0.000090223155,0.019848444,0.000706132,0.000027524538,0.0018004992,0.47465262,0.000210927,0.0066230344,0.33775806,0.076206736,0.08185716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009935636,0.000025464593,0.039973676,0.00046821375,0.000013200366,0.00019203976,0.14031732,0.00005215372,0.0020440957,0.005341293,0.811527,0.00003553056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14842214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29442987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14842214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009217087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015182495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29511642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241456428","doi":"","title":"From Natural Justice to Fairness – Thresholds, Content, and the Role of Judicial Review","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Citizenship; Natural justice; Immigration; Judicial review; Geography","score_opus":0.01650871147873161,"score_gpt":0.3037533496124567,"score_spread":0.2872446381337251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241456428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027936948,0.029933594,0.15592583,0.22959858,0.0027664248,0.000692994,0.00019154341,0.00024267775,0.5527115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90464556,0.0066993935,0.030734917,0.032696772,0.0038257493,0.0008717767,0.000087088956,0.00021300517,0.020225843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8189378,0.10593852,0.007704257,0.013103482,0.044984233,0.009331732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75804806,0.1842701,0.0103502255,0.018986726,0.023721848,0.0046231966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.109911725,0.0005815485,0.0023299705,0.0042137387,0.0075095077,0.019827336,0.004272957,0.0111187,0.004617955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25925657,0.0009611973,0.0009087793,0.0032553957,0.06760979,0.023204364,0.010295072,0.010347452,0.0009571403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009234819,0.000008322096,0.00021336641,0.0000397206,0.000007931978,0.000020337624,0.0006848743,0.00018913602,0.000034522993,0.9903308,0.002254769,0.0062070843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018093586,0.000013986201,0.0002791354,0.00016842793,0.000006994385,0.000036395093,0.00029686443,0.00040099584,0.00010156938,0.9774235,0.021236902,0.000017202961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01050958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.109911725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017438553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031973664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5812757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2248504465","doi":"","title":"Stimulating Sustainable Economic Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa With Legal Systems Enabling Women Entrepreneurs’ Creativity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Multinational corporation; Creativity; Poverty; Political science; Modernization theory; Economic growth; Informal sector; Sustainable growth rate; Business; Economics; Law; Geography; Finance","score_opus":0.010602060745908769,"score_gpt":0.257012697076723,"score_spread":0.2464106363308142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2248504465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46065897,0.016341038,0.007826564,0.06951539,0.0006935245,0.00059932255,0.0001240868,0.000104170584,0.44413695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9620505,0.011067636,0.0087497,0.0027951642,0.000115510906,0.0003105033,0.000043159278,0.00002208855,0.014845805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990068,0.00039230176,0.000025907253,0.000036617825,0.000081093895,0.00045726408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992792,0.00024256569,0.00012012099,0.000029683102,0.00006478021,0.00026363778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018331078,0.00041136786,0.00014708984,0.00084786705,0.004593807,0.0054113762,0.0006858792,0.0010815602,0.006861412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023563604,0.00019442903,0.0001910216,0.0012317084,0.003298708,0.0033067602,0.007539034,0.0012038723,0.0005441393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001137118,0.0003683672,0.017468315,0.0020983417,0.000025534659,0.010421289,0.16032743,0.0011798053,0.008087912,0.45645183,0.032813292,0.31064424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004540769,0.0001384078,0.013656486,0.0022126946,0.000021660433,0.001566664,0.19440171,0.0004147681,0.0030607916,0.054172732,0.73028237,0.000026373504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023945097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006025589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006861412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020173169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00628529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022953749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254167256","doi":"","title":"Spam Legislation in Canada: Federalism, Freedom of Expression and the Regulation of the Internet","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Spamming; Charter; Business; Parliament; Internet privacy; Government (linguistics); Scrutiny; The Internet; Political science; Law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0058829383960089165,"score_gpt":0.2244610233739713,"score_spread":0.21857808497796238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254167256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08225135,0.027793957,0.004532412,0.36450708,0.0020103836,0.00028627634,0.0010572586,0.00033405062,0.51722723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67590475,0.017108819,0.007715246,0.085264124,0.00066123,0.0001397465,0.0005599912,0.00011978759,0.21252637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889299,0.00069120276,0.00023522037,0.00052228465,0.0062877466,0.00333359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898252,0.0024900616,0.00060661597,0.00029139998,0.005346788,0.0014399926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004340579,0.00035870567,0.00043704288,0.002867175,0.021600302,0.01169791,0.0023223967,0.006613353,0.0050386754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012846213,0.00058082887,0.00076334865,0.0032321892,0.009598653,0.002115506,0.002134449,0.0056065903,0.00045012226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059482965,0.000060295417,0.007493224,0.00021553713,0.000017586653,0.0006366173,0.0086512435,0.0012414985,0.00087374536,0.8156057,0.12338618,0.041758884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037564212,0.00004164305,0.03151262,0.00060378556,0.000083568906,0.0001559603,0.0057891267,0.001805741,0.0013526786,0.027474968,0.93097264,0.00016971909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99580956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20007098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20007098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3748239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9278043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254936749","doi":"","title":"Private Law, the State and the Duty to Protect: Tort Actions for Police Failures in Gendered Violence Cases","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Tort; Accountability; Duty; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; State (computer science); Liability","score_opus":0.019732282883735443,"score_gpt":0.32338132619098997,"score_spread":0.3036490433072545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254936749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44345862,0.008469337,0.01712184,0.110327445,0.0007046945,0.00017839766,0.00008132473,0.000095079784,0.41956326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849104,0.0011737084,0.0012402869,0.00392483,0.00012919624,0.000054684002,0.000010428248,0.000018093542,0.008538364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99070567,0.0038180642,0.00026999082,0.00050057657,0.0019449029,0.0027608539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99056256,0.0069891787,0.0009999871,0.00053698313,0.00050517305,0.00040613033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007613774,0.0004785775,0.0006257479,0.0021768173,0.015275323,0.01211562,0.0022517273,0.013594792,0.0037677435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01714237,0.00054011453,0.0009189506,0.0013581604,0.04163791,0.0089957435,0.0076094014,0.010364684,0.0003111965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013924297,0.000023925539,0.002050318,0.000043738488,0.000007965158,0.0012326988,0.06664342,0.00037653962,0.00017948332,0.92218107,0.0025212537,0.004725632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036235284,0.00013740575,0.013154796,0.0014790483,0.00011161434,0.0023563062,0.24612059,0.0029214069,0.002794721,0.49701327,0.2336599,0.00021475475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.110764116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18836659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.110764116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01702759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010742533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2202388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255825711","doi":"","title":"Taalwetgewing in Suid-Afrika","year":2009,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Litnet Akademies : 'n Joernaal vir die Geesteswetenskappe, Natuurwetenskappe, Regte en Godsdienswetenskappe","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.012702023489887559,"score_gpt":0.3063201525003647,"score_spread":0.2936181290104771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255825711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66175467,0.006395923,0.001077,0.012140072,0.00043954403,0.00006097025,0.00058664195,0.0001166566,0.3174285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89039725,0.0011268085,0.00049846724,0.0014452068,0.0000313486,0.000039953018,0.00018835026,0.000048457532,0.10622421],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993755,0.00009716902,0.00001945795,0.000071121976,0.00005458418,0.00038220163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999678,0.000057294816,0.00004938557,0.00002471895,0.000067950634,0.00012266298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046479443,0.0002877259,0.00021549896,0.0005014545,0.005997595,0.0018817658,0.0004965284,0.0007049799,0.020301992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007673578,0.00017474133,0.00017791842,0.00075229397,0.0017120774,0.0014769455,0.0017613801,0.0012359527,0.0025158932],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028319823,0.00015172272,0.049942426,0.00048656276,0.00003543582,0.005545816,0.43360445,0.00014719009,0.008670927,0.18701455,0.073272385,0.2408453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022612552,0.00012822739,0.1182832,0.00034205648,0.000036093355,0.0012071235,0.21554448,0.00013281518,0.0017106821,0.005013394,0.6575275,0.000051743275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41899422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6252677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41899422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005345796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006143007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8331108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256405310","doi":"","title":"Jones v Tsige: A Banking Law Perspective","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Law; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Political science; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.022827424478379557,"score_gpt":0.26784103102200624,"score_spread":0.2450136065436267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256405310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04336558,0.009263186,0.0023828961,0.28822058,0.0007827341,0.00010005104,0.00026506573,0.000032686283,0.65558726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7610542,0.010866933,0.001820721,0.13333505,0.0015383019,0.00015370855,0.00011773067,0.00003834766,0.091075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953414,0.0007676551,0.00012364467,0.00043385586,0.0015473554,0.0017860826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99688077,0.0015729739,0.00021389006,0.00007809665,0.0007989154,0.00045533266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003029652,0.00033776634,0.0004132964,0.002593218,0.01812315,0.013841873,0.0021334186,0.019072743,0.006028283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063430164,0.0005124725,0.0005934776,0.002744748,0.022896465,0.0058736885,0.0027546342,0.009850781,0.0005404544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000848612,0.000019374065,0.00075760717,0.000027179758,0.000005293292,0.00069290044,0.004504592,0.00019663206,0.00025396672,0.9769717,0.014511868,0.0020504524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056956367,0.00007979461,0.009013405,0.00061000773,0.000059437833,0.00080903777,0.023606442,0.0016476416,0.00078226737,0.37323764,0.5899324,0.00016499459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80072385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86460537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80072385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05223146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04604935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4008994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256544311","doi":"","title":"Mandatory relief and supervisory jurisdiction : when is it appropriate, just and equitable?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Law; Original jurisdiction; Political science; Government (linguistics); Federal jurisdiction; Constitutional court; Exclusive jurisdiction; Constitution; Constitutional right; Separation of powers","score_opus":0.03790536619238992,"score_gpt":0.2896650696295711,"score_spread":0.2517597034371812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256544311","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013482582,0.021712186,0.007870127,0.8466114,0.0034068946,0.00009696888,0.000090886526,0.00006444426,0.10666446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73582447,0.013951117,0.0062251333,0.21910083,0.008515149,0.00027802787,0.000119758966,0.00018776246,0.01579769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96309674,0.014156327,0.0021141097,0.0029229408,0.0115322,0.006177706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9631693,0.022964155,0.003059461,0.0018889102,0.0053734197,0.0035448289],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038075853,0.00040010252,0.0011463626,0.0014159057,0.008340675,0.013104679,0.0035931708,0.019432118,0.007591188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.090737,0.00067164004,0.00050857227,0.001328274,0.03551791,0.018102553,0.005984513,0.018051997,0.0010789616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051216026,0.00006526759,0.0016143472,0.00020340538,0.000016219667,0.00030164837,0.0044672606,0.00016560209,0.00017156143,0.90724385,0.043084417,0.042615365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016451483,0.00010950588,0.004833947,0.0037900242,0.00006131826,0.0005589151,0.008258567,0.00063973287,0.0005978594,0.6804203,0.3004345,0.00013087367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048747975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09757035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048747975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011232331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03275386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20136672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256798114","doi":"","title":"Confidentiality and Disclosure in Mediation: When the Chicken Won't Talk","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Mediation; Statutory law; Scope (computer science); Law; Conciliation; Alternative dispute resolution; Political science; Lawyer supported mediation; Business; Common law; Online dispute resolution; Computer science","score_opus":0.012520252402349174,"score_gpt":0.27346304327326293,"score_spread":0.26094279087091377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256798114","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06426133,0.03687251,0.0171214,0.6704462,0.0018487889,0.00014530511,0.00006573387,0.00004531259,0.20919341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93008626,0.008390972,0.0035127988,0.047679253,0.0008273481,0.000093609444,0.00002374221,0.000032291067,0.009353635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94720215,0.028540518,0.0020703252,0.0028028225,0.012775928,0.0066082296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9685401,0.022043666,0.0021941534,0.002423971,0.0032329292,0.0015651565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04322872,0.0003089684,0.0008918012,0.0011346721,0.021001494,0.016224777,0.0020144456,0.0188275,0.0024630984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063003816,0.0006382329,0.00068052707,0.0016562057,0.087539,0.02223728,0.012628207,0.015611894,0.00031358298],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031609285,0.000009607759,0.0016239441,0.00009523855,0.00001529855,0.0006323491,0.058238417,0.0001687515,0.00018703706,0.91926414,0.007536872,0.012196819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062908875,0.00005331863,0.0028231053,0.0021022216,0.000057323887,0.0014518443,0.06856016,0.00050375145,0.0007351473,0.692011,0.23151974,0.00011955063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24209781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19904324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24209781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026648989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051981788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48137724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258318312","doi":"","title":"Canada Water Kerk (Londenbediening) : van oraloor","year":2015,"lang":"nl","type":"article","venue":"Die Kerkblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Maar; Theology; Philosophy; Geology","score_opus":0.032261506533828525,"score_gpt":0.2811571590310056,"score_spread":0.24889565249717704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258318312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041798893,0.027090142,0.00091322657,0.15334238,0.0026160646,0.00015850877,0.0031491609,0.00024181,0.7706897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07575618,0.0052887695,0.00065179216,0.009785769,0.000077320125,0.000029414265,0.00034371414,0.00010801009,0.9079591],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947494,0.000043687392,0.0000130789595,0.000068189205,0.00022300158,0.00017701648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955875,0.000056094756,0.000019029338,0.000015860081,0.00015983658,0.00019048667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000401144,0.00021054532,0.00017545256,0.00037079322,0.0101684285,0.004504403,0.00074096833,0.0025118075,0.07481881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013150839,0.00020093958,0.00014311937,0.0010655021,0.0020484945,0.0016378071,0.0019479342,0.00224971,0.004198658],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063588,0.000038082766,0.0039132624,0.0003197828,0.000013459543,0.002719345,0.021702996,0.00013598638,0.0019556405,0.112253636,0.7765012,0.08038316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020513453,0.000002993595,0.0018257828,0.00005059112,0.0000017304313,0.000058491776,0.0043354547,0.000019040637,0.00021662268,0.00059558835,0.9928831,0.000008517408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9431885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9856485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07481881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023024604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04103658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2502939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259655095","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1603830","title":"Back to the Future in South African Security: From Intentions to Effective Mechanisms: Part II - Restorative Justice, Crime, and (In)security in Africa","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Criminology; Economic Justice; Political science; Computer security; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.010773285500786475,"score_gpt":0.27610596113995145,"score_spread":0.26533267563916496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259655095","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7865867,0.00979733,0.0016499909,0.097255014,0.00019563422,0.00005488008,0.00007356671,0.0000075841795,0.10437936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99626994,0.0014832482,0.00011036611,0.00048349774,0.000012956517,0.000012353436,0.0000050730223,0.000004378848,0.001618187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847656,0.0006733192,0.00003845719,0.00010093948,0.00010218953,0.0006085009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973455,0.0014043212,0.0006025182,0.00010802484,0.00023101123,0.00030862523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042887353,0.000358273,0.0003094973,0.0013710003,0.0068769907,0.0070502,0.00069837243,0.0025029858,0.008966706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068481257,0.00038950137,0.0002742415,0.0016643093,0.02377798,0.011879394,0.004839403,0.0053775925,0.00023799649],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006179876,0.00009938973,0.013522891,0.00023147701,0.00001266889,0.00036811395,0.3163967,0.00025252736,0.0003082442,0.6485097,0.0019944177,0.01824202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019558187,0.0000664756,0.043193784,0.0015371342,0.000034105884,0.00026287048,0.7639332,0.00042104445,0.0005296782,0.14260612,0.047353264,0.000042755277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03250846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047559213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03250846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006933275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0078866845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064638495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260600733","doi":"","title":"Women’s Constitutional Activism in Canada and South Africa","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Political economy; Development economics; Economics","score_opus":0.01970990178880861,"score_gpt":0.2346631737128687,"score_spread":0.2149532719240601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260600733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7504429,0.006538379,0.00020175245,0.067921214,0.00027119415,0.00012653648,0.00020254073,0.000012825516,0.17428263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725618,0.0011027784,0.00012705503,0.004346291,0.00002700809,0.000034530825,0.000024102541,0.0000123716445,0.02176409],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99309915,0.0007826689,0.00011239257,0.00032425552,0.0007007908,0.0049806954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99256295,0.0029175172,0.000564309,0.00012448635,0.0009623033,0.0028684593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003184905,0.00033213626,0.0006176682,0.0032183072,0.053855542,0.01113226,0.0019936839,0.005062092,0.01175213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009821144,0.0004933181,0.0003611088,0.0054486548,0.013495211,0.0021836325,0.0068996716,0.008418672,0.00026416025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026407806,0.00013241486,0.022014651,0.0003965667,0.00007508939,0.00449796,0.49287447,0.0003792585,0.0018240119,0.41057822,0.028275462,0.0386878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007522871,0.0000521179,0.07162451,0.0007805818,0.00006442192,0.00055879937,0.5752012,0.000276975,0.0011775305,0.009954538,0.34012777,0.00010637781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9742013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9930146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11367949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11367949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17440681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82480633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260725809","doi":"","title":"The Duty of Fairness: From Nicholson to Baker and Beyond","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Notice; Supreme court; Law; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Political science; Citizenship; Nothing; Immigration; History","score_opus":0.010420384982274211,"score_gpt":0.27279196745253065,"score_spread":0.26237158247025644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260725809","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014439879,0.074540265,0.016346911,0.35231596,0.0039805956,0.000081954015,0.00006724748,0.000050738603,0.5381765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7368001,0.034684464,0.011219889,0.091559306,0.0023202933,0.00017617761,0.000047486254,0.00014389856,0.123048455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919452,0.0024214534,0.0002564781,0.0011158322,0.0026796684,0.0015814024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948289,0.0027586196,0.00024215535,0.00039700695,0.0012294182,0.0005438233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008445866,0.0005473984,0.0007412269,0.0021494075,0.012913882,0.008605701,0.0019937882,0.005691927,0.002605323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013453433,0.00038380278,0.00041636726,0.0022371141,0.08310861,0.012999225,0.005120374,0.01212235,0.00044777873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003567646,0.0000023909433,0.00005578779,0.000014018503,7.11357e-7,0.000027469521,0.0026541573,0.000032319687,0.000013595948,0.9897233,0.003874003,0.0035986928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000776604,0.0000073853394,0.00029160432,0.0004084117,0.000004352566,0.000070629954,0.0037028585,0.00013931007,0.000099171986,0.75320566,0.24204066,0.000022145066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4084327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3320204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4084327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04542843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047580834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81211066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262034836","doi":"","title":"Good governance for NGOs : tax international","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Without Prejudice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Corporate governance; Political science; Business; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.02636243065743611,"score_gpt":0.347983518449591,"score_spread":0.3216210877921549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262034836","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0092745125,0.004231188,0.006856718,0.59035325,0.0024776284,0.00017224133,0.000074687654,0.000105760286,0.38645405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.694565,0.008941959,0.01655717,0.11119334,0.0019892596,0.0005155822,0.00017209246,0.00018543504,0.16588019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895779,0.0055981334,0.00037568877,0.00060093,0.0017730886,0.0020743527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9785648,0.0057999273,0.0020854939,0.0031410898,0.004360737,0.0060478686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01979018,0.00037676285,0.00036362663,0.0010880786,0.005862703,0.015352318,0.0010992399,0.0070380964,0.019174775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037195858,0.00036830214,0.00034843033,0.0014921799,0.012151456,0.0142657645,0.0086862575,0.009242561,0.0017289534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013387842,0.00003693538,0.0010215844,0.00007241976,0.000006117353,0.000078417725,0.0016790107,0.00017367578,0.00011542467,0.9098821,0.06174368,0.02517722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002615321,0.00005268513,0.0028727055,0.00096977584,0.000011906107,0.00013139973,0.008095288,0.00033956568,0.000303243,0.31149146,0.6756782,0.00002760252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007849844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017864417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01979018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005178838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02702274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10466176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262943403","doi":"","title":"Non-Universalité, Illégitimité Et Surcomplexité Des Droits Économiques Et Sociaux? Des Préoccupations Légitimes Mais Hypertrophiées: Regard Sur La Jurisprudence Canadienne Et Sud-Africaine (Non-Universality, Illegitimacy and Over Complexity of Economic and Social Rights? Legitimate Concerns But Hypertrophied: Focus on Canadian and South African Jurisprudence)","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.037417363919534964,"score_gpt":0.2909212037901191,"score_spread":0.2535038398705841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262943403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36732474,0.036888458,0.010849325,0.1823329,0.0003685418,0.00008280001,0.00015452293,0.000047616297,0.40195116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893225,0.0025280234,0.0011246282,0.0022001362,0.00011176532,0.000026203958,0.000013503815,0.000022264094,0.004650919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99225944,0.0033549808,0.00029205202,0.0009671273,0.0015104347,0.0016160123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98847765,0.0076047527,0.00091563404,0.0012582814,0.0010497335,0.00069399964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009415671,0.00044912487,0.0010650905,0.0025881615,0.014879779,0.017873548,0.0016175453,0.005866851,0.004124419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017519945,0.0005345194,0.00040701343,0.0045151995,0.12574011,0.013449346,0.009968401,0.011725157,0.00017858112],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003756285,0.000004970165,0.00032433125,0.000014739432,0.0000025267468,0.00004393065,0.019520987,0.000032863587,0.000072440445,0.97733885,0.00031454125,0.0023260443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021255242,0.000016777087,0.005995946,0.00032363748,0.000023445296,0.00021115846,0.04193668,0.0002845564,0.00028409762,0.88383305,0.067024454,0.000044961915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24482399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31639236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.755176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023167204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029715551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48679793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263659966","doi":"","title":"Tercon Contractors: The Effect of Exclusion Clauses on the Tendering Process","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Procurement; Business; Law and economics; Industrial organization; Economics; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.007675066680775974,"score_gpt":0.3003185728067872,"score_spread":0.2926435061260112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263659966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051633418,0.0011605227,0.060749356,0.011126604,0.0007617712,0.00043377973,0.00035395529,0.0003174811,0.87346303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79131645,0.0012106983,0.024889214,0.011405463,0.0009008286,0.000774064,0.00036757797,0.000652648,0.16848297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97181207,0.010624813,0.0012549541,0.002732262,0.009631656,0.003944214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9196601,0.058609903,0.003465417,0.0067214943,0.010297591,0.0012453606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026877338,0.0010621167,0.00090746884,0.0016292676,0.0087676635,0.011657224,0.0036314894,0.0068769422,0.04066616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.069257684,0.00097485894,0.0017822905,0.0018157985,0.012164497,0.014700573,0.008740269,0.013754074,0.004533049],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009903235,0.00005393696,0.0008071401,0.000043608932,0.000008808795,0.0003081125,0.0018448647,0.0007202418,0.00034013935,0.9830904,0.005207326,0.0074765244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043371334,0.00021687902,0.0032506657,0.0006217903,0.00019460387,0.00051107607,0.003076967,0.012803156,0.004605654,0.64158505,0.3325107,0.0001896779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054617595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04155442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054617595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009135387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014617655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14214265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265158501","doi":"","title":"Equality in the workplace - reflections from South Africa and beyond, Ockert Dupper and Christoph Garbers (Eds.) : boekbesprekings","year":2010,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Journal of South African Law / Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disappointment; Political science; Equity (law); Library science; Variety (cybernetics); Kingdom; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.027131398170269588,"score_gpt":0.30324564687889755,"score_spread":0.27611424870862794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265158501","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020589445,0.6678808,0.00052671385,0.22609729,0.0046300036,0.0000270277,0.000039117032,0.000017628752,0.08019205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27571288,0.64254576,0.0008458851,0.014262352,0.001803845,0.000074030075,0.000041363473,0.00008162412,0.06463244],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887425,0.0005444228,0.000042163174,0.00007515316,0.00019844437,0.00026548054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988243,0.0007281814,0.00009614413,0.000030521507,0.00008659382,0.00023429528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024611847,0.0008061961,0.0006924407,0.0009422922,0.011908141,0.011463306,0.0008016309,0.0030296738,0.007873488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026932764,0.0006038898,0.00030301503,0.0036580993,0.009872875,0.008733161,0.0046389145,0.0050948947,0.0011342814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077492834,0.00008848914,0.0015793582,0.002064639,0.000023771416,0.0018268875,0.36996913,0.00017829695,0.0007777199,0.23282607,0.2395053,0.15108286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010027699,0.000025076028,0.0031066765,0.0027808193,0.0000122333695,0.00056651694,0.23574246,0.000036337962,0.00019460713,0.026569132,0.7309386,0.000017419323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017660076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039501686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017660076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00637258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01113489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046236575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266143053","doi":"10.22145/flr.39.1.6","title":"The Process of Law Reform: Conditions for Success","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Law reform; Law; Politics; Public law; Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Political science; Project commissioning; Publishing","score_opus":0.06468398277748962,"score_gpt":0.38638811212857493,"score_spread":0.32170412935108533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266143053","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.121898904,0.007036861,0.010901492,0.4379884,0.0009929107,0.0013564558,0.00021057972,0.00024541566,0.41936895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96824247,0.0016594034,0.0037010992,0.008793857,0.00067920296,0.0006577605,0.00007673771,0.00011604677,0.016073532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9462465,0.0178861,0.0018846884,0.0032475688,0.012257536,0.018477507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83331263,0.08186635,0.012951639,0.0071778772,0.023216676,0.041474838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054856863,0.0004371958,0.0009638297,0.0029492837,0.016752359,0.03179977,0.001594007,0.013114401,0.01882196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11581083,0.0005880968,0.00065773545,0.0028613585,0.03484772,0.020476526,0.014163255,0.01134316,0.003618708],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016415877,0.0007354098,0.013856051,0.00030753744,0.00002427321,0.0006551473,0.019548329,0.00045490352,0.0004913462,0.8881059,0.027884806,0.047772158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003302788,0.00049844483,0.027651401,0.0011983715,0.00003525306,0.00047438312,0.061210506,0.0016211838,0.0010614234,0.6433542,0.2623867,0.00017796096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072513036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007432311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054856863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011101944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047870442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29011428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266915758","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2251456","title":"Consultation Paper on a Franchise Act for British Columbia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Franchise; Political science; Library science; Law; Public administration; Business; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.007021480444889727,"score_gpt":0.26309752301284217,"score_spread":0.25607604256795247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266915758","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015967494,0.002924783,0.00054665154,0.8065165,0.025411658,0.0004115935,0.001225989,0.0001333991,0.14686194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05990961,0.0019182642,0.0006570537,0.32229203,0.002514453,0.00029603348,0.00037378058,0.00017978487,0.6118589],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99406946,0.0007550586,0.00033417335,0.00040025666,0.0019016308,0.0025394366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847484,0.00697889,0.00026088912,0.00039380314,0.005287209,0.0023309179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004443692,0.00080112496,0.0012054414,0.0012142452,0.021030562,0.007054831,0.0033080678,0.050135348,0.052616872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027307844,0.00086405437,0.0012332241,0.0012520857,0.0023103678,0.0023395203,0.0029005588,0.0301167,0.006077473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006394348,0.000032920274,0.0004954747,0.00007023574,0.000016777207,0.0026583893,0.001263263,0.00014901756,0.0004637231,0.006659732,0.98386467,0.0042617666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005986673,0.000034880442,0.003438013,0.0003919409,0.000051275776,0.00036889382,0.006808087,0.00032319446,0.0006526987,0.0022364773,0.9855317,0.00010293658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70960927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8384675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29039073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024766088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09334836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5842018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267108635","doi":"","title":"Book Review of 'The Strange Alchemy of Life and Law' by Albie Sachs","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Alchemy; Courage; Law; Rigour; Democracy; Political science; Economic Justice; Milestone; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Epistemology; Politics; Theology","score_opus":0.014553448383503685,"score_gpt":0.26991443064564796,"score_spread":0.25536098226214426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267108635","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004416856,0.7092442,0.00048630548,0.11281869,0.06020505,0.00003150969,0.00017442918,0.00007547481,0.11652263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009513157,0.46749797,0.00075848895,0.04388795,0.053939126,0.00007848515,0.00028478255,0.00018371397,0.42385638],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993357,0.00013998534,0.000022165023,0.00007740862,0.0003702422,0.000054476648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984037,0.0008006523,0.00009457186,0.00004680615,0.000497101,0.0001570964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007292861,0.000833855,0.0006916427,0.002056973,0.002011164,0.002812157,0.0008549954,0.0013606928,0.023474466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033464548,0.00035944456,0.00031180738,0.0028001494,0.0020420097,0.0031057054,0.0010770715,0.0037653742,0.009052223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041059516,0.00000452171,0.000014175931,0.0001300092,0.0000014095443,0.000023595489,0.00010233113,0.000039284678,0.000032658685,0.0042588697,0.9792726,0.016116353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001639405,0.00000410354,0.00013371799,0.00023674416,0.0000010263694,0.00005318924,0.000088725224,0.000013906094,0.0000113692795,0.0008355776,0.99861753,0.0000025718364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020289907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042976324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023474466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003188305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004547139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078529894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W22685458","doi":"10.1155/2012/286079","title":"Indigenous Knowledge, Livelihoods and Government Policy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Toxicology","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Livelihood; Geography; Tourism; Wildlife; Wetland; Indigenous; Delta; Resource (disambiguation); Environmental planning; Ecology; Agriculture","score_opus":0.03887373694957096,"score_gpt":0.3401691167171845,"score_spread":0.30129537976761356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W22685458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14527045,0.021432977,0.0031380146,0.05349563,0.0005490304,0.00007254974,0.0009474672,0.00012833609,0.7749655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9216851,0.016872237,0.002802884,0.0035561887,0.00021679654,0.00006169397,0.00024732415,0.000032783177,0.054525066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990984,0.00027033262,0.000035549787,0.00007956046,0.00021475405,0.00030153268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986261,0.00046900767,0.00026227217,0.00014382653,0.00023431538,0.0002645814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013347694,0.00014725783,0.0003615602,0.0010286047,0.0023471664,0.0031182766,0.00060310296,0.00091064983,0.017057113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034836594,0.00009647796,0.00014665263,0.0025303843,0.0033157635,0.0019802463,0.002508893,0.0012370045,0.0010926443],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001137355,0.00016719582,0.0139312865,0.0010221499,0.000061104314,0.0015720283,0.02317073,0.00089184404,0.001409376,0.60846543,0.02667617,0.32251891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013129109,0.00010380916,0.035708386,0.0014395366,0.00003270842,0.0006959341,0.026195409,0.00088847737,0.00076619623,0.13569887,0.7983995,0.000058044858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047267824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06305821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047267824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004699788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062064542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09398538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269607816","doi":"","title":"Practice and procedure: Costs on review - What charges are appropriate? Picamore Pty Ltd v Challen [2015] QDC 067","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Context (archaeology); Law; Work (physics); Political science; Civil procedure; Engineering; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.022376873988257537,"score_gpt":0.29229576708758964,"score_spread":0.2699188930993321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269607816","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026235653,0.019602742,0.0037732907,0.8842821,0.00888069,0.00040748817,0.00024501764,0.0001199263,0.080065094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13047178,0.01401365,0.009235963,0.792118,0.013577348,0.0008703883,0.00030167954,0.00025682442,0.039154414],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8276144,0.06587857,0.019885318,0.005608644,0.07148673,0.009526291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6626589,0.16852626,0.027755512,0.012659692,0.112105146,0.016294526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08884628,0.0006592168,0.0014435285,0.0039018404,0.0061549195,0.01624134,0.004486753,0.023237834,0.008646826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3873608,0.0009898578,0.0013863345,0.003360666,0.010842054,0.012059078,0.006506532,0.016893685,0.0029616023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008943491,0.000045899276,0.0019772612,0.0009926027,0.000052121468,0.0004387865,0.001991788,0.000143436,0.00032400078,0.1514721,0.7755487,0.06692378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007810401,0.00011235848,0.0061099934,0.0047715753,0.00007640766,0.00068769976,0.0017008766,0.00034433702,0.00036668646,0.03053571,0.9550614,0.0001549165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05360846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.094468236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08884628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02422671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06477146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46986967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270097586","doi":"","title":"Local government alternative dispute resolution: a British Columbian case study","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"ProQuest Dissertations and Theses","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Likert scale; Process (computing); Qualitative research; Thematic analysis; Supervisor; Order (exchange); Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.017823750143306644,"score_gpt":0.33481616930948405,"score_spread":0.3169924191661774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270097586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8494552,0.003260901,0.0011396678,0.0149570545,0.00012919617,0.00060752523,0.000341947,0.000038165446,0.13007034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9562989,0.0029759398,0.0013954382,0.0033087023,0.00002303827,0.00023187796,0.00017563713,0.00002772709,0.035562765],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938444,0.0023026231,0.00019601434,0.0003172365,0.0013394523,0.002000362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992875,0.0026889697,0.00041655859,0.00028405525,0.0018648591,0.0018706206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004039069,0.00043252573,0.0005591889,0.0024849358,0.03737021,0.006092946,0.0039809407,0.004277136,0.0067778323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008403603,0.00060055725,0.00027481862,0.008732612,0.0055670654,0.001475298,0.005139994,0.004858579,0.00073961174],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003337011,0.0014890705,0.060360163,0.0014800025,0.00008878287,0.12071773,0.5389013,0.0050558024,0.0021881906,0.049557503,0.07149215,0.14833562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053356773,0.00012627072,0.031847995,0.000715107,0.000041384792,0.0039436487,0.8097235,0.0018490958,0.00033402586,0.0015028463,0.14976594,0.00009687368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9649971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9907252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094893426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.094893426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06405455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6885032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271301890","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1288","title":"The South African Judicial Appointments Process","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Political science; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.013693792431736268,"score_gpt":0.2923582814250808,"score_spread":0.2786644889933445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271301890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020107765,0.0063639022,0.003526542,0.060479946,0.003290574,0.0006112207,0.00044365146,0.0001264886,0.90505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22454983,0.0047685844,0.002958509,0.025801787,0.0016624036,0.000672916,0.00022313347,0.00015647624,0.7392064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.988962,0.0023515364,0.0007056615,0.0012287351,0.0030719638,0.003680055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915581,0.0041731778,0.00044540962,0.0006989337,0.0021583417,0.00096599857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013191161,0.00056124094,0.00057491683,0.0027618692,0.023081535,0.011714946,0.0021856178,0.008913283,0.06554897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03245464,0.00083145616,0.0005588343,0.0034418916,0.0057188147,0.0046568555,0.008881629,0.009071958,0.011338674],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002611042,0.000031336476,0.00044726097,0.000078794474,0.0000047207295,0.0007912463,0.0076714433,0.00009104014,0.00030419417,0.8277768,0.14053714,0.02223985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015750777,0.000008666303,0.00091228995,0.00022455807,0.0000055524456,0.00012458494,0.0020227127,0.0001397557,0.00023522085,0.02019886,0.9760962,0.000015792275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03676625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05840226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06554897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01118171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030364463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21928316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272975401","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4568","title":"Cardboard Boxes and Invisible Fences: Homelessness and Public Space in City of Victoria v. Adams","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Victory; Normative; Sociology; Autonomy; Public space; Economic Justice; Poverty; Law; Meaning (existential); Space (punctuation); Political science; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Politics; History; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.041755369473819644,"score_gpt":0.3374319252273366,"score_spread":0.295676555753517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272975401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6874327,0.010458411,0.0009964292,0.10098097,0.00042077852,0.000072660965,0.00007820656,0.000012022085,0.19954775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97970515,0.0018282826,0.00008509584,0.006860298,0.00004953108,0.000022017759,0.0000084369985,0.000005991681,0.011435122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972042,0.00090553594,0.00006376489,0.00016417065,0.00043848154,0.0012238635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983364,0.00083755236,0.00022588491,0.00004569234,0.00018092003,0.00037361833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017948876,0.00021604335,0.0003206261,0.0008875089,0.02845812,0.007333282,0.0015750214,0.0057470687,0.0027771946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037917385,0.00052150356,0.0002785215,0.0012344767,0.022093005,0.003634852,0.0069569927,0.007991858,0.00011901065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036415415,0.00004372384,0.004237769,0.00010424653,0.00000869198,0.0030334534,0.20386475,0.00020399621,0.0003099094,0.7661556,0.012835126,0.009166301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038508693,0.00007319216,0.019029824,0.0009955049,0.000058716058,0.0012469317,0.5508452,0.0004158007,0.000878246,0.08202418,0.34422186,0.00017212145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.616073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7631504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.616073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024930172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019449757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.772376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273733982","doi":"","title":"Production and marketing - two sides of the same coin : at home with...","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stockfarm","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trademark; Marketing; Product (mathematics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Business; Production (economics); Agricultural science; Agricultural economics; Advertising; Geography; Economics; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01779355398533591,"score_gpt":0.28614989328109286,"score_spread":0.268356339295757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273733982","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00601035,0.059246197,0.0036369776,0.6298937,0.010621491,0.00005846401,0.00004851831,0.000088485795,0.29039586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36812523,0.053637885,0.0057697045,0.27088666,0.0130768735,0.00022812298,0.000071283,0.00046096573,0.2877432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887707,0.0052330582,0.00042056522,0.0012876883,0.002757207,0.0015307186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99063045,0.004583656,0.0010668947,0.0008650102,0.0014280197,0.0014261343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006081622,0.00076371175,0.0008460734,0.0016528891,0.007833717,0.021457074,0.0010072927,0.0107655125,0.022714412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011795388,0.00046188888,0.00034625674,0.0041062227,0.043120027,0.027127268,0.007196925,0.010966132,0.005047813],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059533584,0.00006201421,0.0016188448,0.0005802602,0.000022403154,0.0005259217,0.035136797,0.000058363177,0.00066311326,0.68858284,0.1933891,0.07930092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001357087,0.000045481935,0.0018698168,0.0009957791,0.000010798261,0.0004461738,0.02337924,0.00005643593,0.00027238874,0.07463152,0.898249,0.00002983185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056942217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055098096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022714412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068518235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07598728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274644315","doi":"","title":"Can There Be Legitimate Pluralism in Modes of Protecting Religions and Their Freedom? the Cases of Canada and South Africa","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Politics; Freedom of religion; Supreme court; Multiculturalism; Religious pluralism; Subsidiarity; Secularity; Human rights; Sociology; European union","score_opus":0.025824593168259666,"score_gpt":0.24232780199881923,"score_spread":0.21650320883055957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274644315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28049985,0.02857299,0.0016435995,0.20329344,0.0005592106,0.00023802627,0.00018779072,0.000025482883,0.48497966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95875186,0.005667291,0.0005696944,0.010820693,0.00008694074,0.00007118385,0.000023479,0.000019090989,0.023989672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864158,0.0021562227,0.000258304,0.00077383715,0.0024849966,0.00791074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933135,0.0029787067,0.00049955293,0.0003968597,0.0013994009,0.0014120125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006799425,0.0007005275,0.0008002456,0.0029472106,0.052380595,0.012383265,0.0028795307,0.009783428,0.0042999145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015857486,0.0005660715,0.00094923645,0.0035888571,0.0371386,0.00554858,0.008616941,0.013306142,0.00025357064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041791784,0.000026804477,0.0026172828,0.00014370303,0.00003161298,0.0029540188,0.06521365,0.0002536922,0.0002975907,0.90695685,0.010098014,0.011365093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016478692,0.00003732332,0.016575947,0.0021270926,0.0002111556,0.0023339458,0.26046476,0.00087742443,0.0016273072,0.1689889,0.5462899,0.00030146513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98138016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99080324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.103012815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.103012815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.127032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74741375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275821254","doi":"","title":"The Legislature Strikes Back: The Effect of Ontario’s Bill 152 on the Beneficiaries of the Statutory Duty of Care in the Peoples Decision","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Legislature; Duty; Duty of care; Law; Business; Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.009495012955705796,"score_gpt":0.28556250511921594,"score_spread":0.2760674921635101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275821254","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02951897,0.0024527353,0.00035625166,0.8270988,0.0035353405,0.0001027443,0.00051760336,0.00004179457,0.13637583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17146456,0.0019174268,0.0007496037,0.6803707,0.0019970855,0.0001248931,0.00019060493,0.00010457484,0.14308053],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9717425,0.0034094,0.00095848955,0.0019468386,0.011248177,0.010694602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9719097,0.013913878,0.0012354769,0.00071227056,0.00713673,0.0050919973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019912371,0.0005315961,0.0011490395,0.002258381,0.03754806,0.0153452335,0.0051387823,0.05102685,0.010127103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04218019,0.0020947114,0.0019711074,0.002691352,0.017621806,0.0043231566,0.004076136,0.038776767,0.0013465829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001485352,0.000090827874,0.0056580827,0.00014081562,0.00011364794,0.0010528505,0.013288165,0.00039029674,0.00071189506,0.34585005,0.62230074,0.010253993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028537354,0.00006328472,0.037287604,0.0006151249,0.0002747194,0.00020801897,0.011610291,0.00056180387,0.0010444914,0.023749854,0.92395157,0.00034800396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9790491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12051646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12051646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25217244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8744122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277623564","doi":"","title":"Functionaries and functions in extradition proceedings : South African judicial decisions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Yearbook of International Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Imprisonment; Law; Appeal; Life imprisonment; Political science; Girl; Criminology; Economic Justice; Prison; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.018751947081468556,"score_gpt":0.2589453351960249,"score_spread":0.24019338811455637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277623564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2056198,0.021156484,0.003222431,0.13327086,0.0010428819,0.0001843985,0.0001074619,0.00005613313,0.63533944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9063001,0.0053038355,0.001193956,0.01608945,0.00024405123,0.000089672416,0.000023180673,0.000042606356,0.070713066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99209714,0.0028601342,0.0005085908,0.00049161183,0.0011952489,0.0028473297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98929286,0.0067961,0.00068656047,0.00039753874,0.0014263603,0.0014005045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010334418,0.0003624976,0.00030028695,0.002189646,0.022914788,0.0118517745,0.0016701118,0.008096241,0.008597101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024369532,0.0006060714,0.00027435287,0.0022869306,0.016306095,0.0063166204,0.0068193325,0.009228952,0.0007395222],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020387795,0.00003121251,0.0022597008,0.00010179384,0.000006644018,0.0021902677,0.057940915,0.00016879904,0.00047720078,0.8862123,0.024111085,0.02647984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043772947,0.000088400346,0.017862095,0.002369307,0.000043629912,0.0017087254,0.11051457,0.00044604015,0.0014718289,0.11874039,0.74657696,0.00013427967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09413654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23483711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09413654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013748112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021849949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18717718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278063734","doi":"10.11575/prism/34110","title":"Marc Ribeiro v. Dragons' Den","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.024482587614469548,"score_gpt":0.2513028307785939,"score_spread":0.22682024316412433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278063734","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02173938,0.0064180032,0.0004027355,0.051322218,0.000980656,0.000091470836,0.00012423766,0.00008602533,0.9188353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39382204,0.0045944313,0.0006139878,0.07710088,0.0006390517,0.000116544245,0.00009216859,0.000054030384,0.52296686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978707,0.00022806438,0.000041624415,0.00032645138,0.0007250996,0.0008079873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994247,0.0002481841,0.000050100134,0.000036569894,0.000126292,0.00011413197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092366454,0.00035781274,0.00023216628,0.0007160839,0.011975509,0.003596833,0.00093964924,0.006315074,0.009711365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036907273,0.0004119531,0.0002704748,0.00057866285,0.0031730912,0.00090916594,0.0014639923,0.0063107456,0.0013324242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007103938,0.00003592809,0.0020480475,0.00016768574,0.000012514671,0.0027553514,0.00953569,0.00019846363,0.0017576733,0.5913433,0.37208104,0.019993257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016114931,0.000023868713,0.0033939607,0.00020275099,0.000015630096,0.00043274296,0.0017301665,0.00011726295,0.00092020957,0.006165743,0.98694485,0.000036666694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49607164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6703863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49607164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012783825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0094483495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98636836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279900960","doi":"","title":"A compliance paradigm shift : financial law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Without Prejudice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treasury; Mandate; Compliance (psychology); Quarter (Canadian coin); Business; Financial services; Paradigm shift; Key (lock); Finance; Accounting; Law; Political science; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.05632751559696221,"score_gpt":0.35113297163190177,"score_spread":0.2948054560349396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279900960","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013908448,0.0037341518,0.02950689,0.7614627,0.0021584157,0.0001426161,0.00009607904,0.00012744972,0.18886332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59231967,0.0031562673,0.024185063,0.34147376,0.0048289755,0.00066437246,0.00013512002,0.00018591393,0.03305086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9604708,0.016951304,0.00163099,0.0063957223,0.010955219,0.0035959184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.957574,0.025609368,0.0025981925,0.0033250663,0.008223396,0.0026699114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048322584,0.00055729575,0.0010035866,0.0023554047,0.010118073,0.018094858,0.003220241,0.028640812,0.0085296715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054498427,0.0006791283,0.0013622333,0.0019760628,0.037115637,0.028327879,0.007429174,0.033608124,0.0015830662],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004756656,0.000023144812,0.00011529236,0.000025266758,0.0000029597288,0.00004895581,0.0013679476,0.000063124,0.00008032317,0.987329,0.0070234053,0.003915744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004670726,0.00006595013,0.00049354654,0.00041096963,0.0000088901925,0.00019517863,0.001761376,0.00077469024,0.00026870533,0.8462967,0.14962614,0.00005111939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012704751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00690222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048322584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0146686435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027547639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2555573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2280194287","doi":"","title":"Cornubia Precinct Development : construction and project management","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Civil Engineering = Siviele Ingenieurswese","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Precinct; Geography; Settlement (finance); Industrial zone; Environmental planning; Archaeology; Regional science; Business","score_opus":0.010558697489035169,"score_gpt":0.24774926267672787,"score_spread":0.2371905651876927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2280194287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28487208,0.0018114843,0.014970845,0.004396185,0.00017196762,0.007878231,0.002173774,0.0005654163,0.68315995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5245565,0.0018526377,0.03731355,0.0003188199,0.000059174705,0.0027910548,0.0019193873,0.00022370211,0.43096507],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984889,0.00027314233,0.000051918814,0.00014311203,0.0006091087,0.00043381928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977562,0.00015272372,0.0002640362,0.000164168,0.0005668468,0.001095982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014503627,0.00031938136,0.00012182443,0.002314807,0.003840854,0.0039148736,0.0012046678,0.00045281713,0.018640783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027949987,0.0003154859,0.00006841856,0.003160856,0.0010801649,0.0006041175,0.0030231404,0.0006645841,0.0027023198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010138969,0.0005026451,0.053560663,0.00023961788,0.000007164667,0.0015351237,0.00889394,0.0018542174,0.0037773207,0.025933571,0.11213616,0.79145813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016420063,0.00022666396,0.10603377,0.00016189337,0.000004320748,0.00070345675,0.010832215,0.0013577497,0.0013225859,0.0019033588,0.8774108,0.00002673528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043735772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15274915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043735772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006758427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019278439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0869624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282477943","doi":"","title":"The role of pathological gambling in the sentencing of a person convicted of armed robbery : a comparative discussion of the South African, Canadian and Australian jurisdictions : comments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Criminology; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.0816407160527359,"score_gpt":0.3236185034298723,"score_spread":0.2419777873771364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282477943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63824385,0.008531747,0.0004374958,0.23978671,0.0011211054,0.00020748968,0.0001447662,0.000013817212,0.11151301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9430702,0.0067938482,0.00048534668,0.03360022,0.00040847863,0.00008851283,0.000042617452,0.00001189147,0.015499008],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99615496,0.00083994033,0.00020278037,0.00020187309,0.0008494191,0.0017509232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938689,0.0029646307,0.00048865424,0.00009307923,0.0015715378,0.001013316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005301364,0.00035929724,0.00041720815,0.0023625956,0.027333759,0.005237239,0.0025068806,0.0069429795,0.0021862397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016319852,0.0003533286,0.00063242856,0.0023250664,0.011046971,0.0016433742,0.0029054102,0.008382054,0.00019344303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013952237,0.00015198719,0.038000043,0.0007110109,0.000046973277,0.018820887,0.72231144,0.00051557797,0.0014782168,0.14523585,0.04285433,0.02973418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014508319,0.000089341105,0.07891933,0.0010715127,0.00010905299,0.0020864413,0.8352578,0.00023814639,0.0005809959,0.0037978445,0.07771339,0.00012155013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89186716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9640396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10813284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030825088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.064694315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22365272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283350547","doi":"","title":"Secrecy is a slippery affair : media freedom","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhodes Journalism Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Officer; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Code (set theory); Political science; Computer security; Computer science; Law; Advertising; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1004118482646366,"score_gpt":0.3460162223802308,"score_spread":0.24560437411559416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283350547","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020485817,0.027156146,0.0023804337,0.5684398,0.0031800086,0.00004435041,0.00013941184,0.000043795484,0.37813032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7899345,0.025477761,0.0011040405,0.12842466,0.005413647,0.0000966175,0.00008215961,0.00007205417,0.049394447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99039066,0.0045808316,0.00039190057,0.0006755628,0.0025425728,0.001418472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783397,0.013338156,0.0026141643,0.0019701663,0.0025428245,0.0011950175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011282737,0.00028281927,0.00038825852,0.0017408612,0.006667627,0.012762341,0.00083030574,0.0074183973,0.010417886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02659395,0.0003042995,0.0005471089,0.0015245969,0.020777507,0.017909434,0.005286414,0.00790175,0.0015655055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003446006,0.000014703742,0.00076800614,0.00017721383,0.000023469081,0.0004251755,0.0051805354,0.00012527095,0.00022420543,0.92474973,0.049481854,0.018795354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034865207,0.000054416818,0.003084774,0.0016274308,0.00004234241,0.00085850735,0.013382353,0.00016175519,0.0008192747,0.2696503,0.71023095,0.000053025775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009980564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008656891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012762341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035349927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006222592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059669554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283663779","doi":"","title":"'n Taalwet vir Suid-Afrika? Die rol van sosiolinguistiese beginsels by die ontleding van taalwetgewing","year":2010,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Litnet Akademies : 'n Joernaal vir die Geesteswetenskappe, Natuurwetenskappe, Regte en Godsdienswetenskappe","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01176054951707885,"score_gpt":0.28483201059101904,"score_spread":0.2730714610739402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283663779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17687288,0.013316134,0.015757205,0.04766521,0.0011562065,0.000056510613,0.0006253148,0.00028441174,0.74426615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88704455,0.004655317,0.0032812085,0.0020453336,0.00016783291,0.000034292538,0.00023741345,0.00021974123,0.10231433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995895,0.00014965981,0.000020765996,0.00007465353,0.00005390354,0.000111612244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970883,0.00009854625,0.000044883614,0.00004351995,0.000066000124,0.000038111048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056027406,0.0003833656,0.00022976987,0.0002637732,0.002296629,0.004267614,0.00033143026,0.00059471204,0.015397297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010932408,0.00022716896,0.00022439625,0.00038801008,0.0031052968,0.0034112872,0.0014988675,0.001517346,0.0039185593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001503333,0.000035856792,0.008314215,0.00052842486,0.000043613847,0.0011673648,0.12486752,0.00032295406,0.0086966315,0.7110644,0.032635268,0.112173416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014723186,0.000039532115,0.016171996,0.00040505058,0.00003528892,0.0006808286,0.076588325,0.00037892227,0.0036368386,0.06597349,0.836024,0.000050918006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03377476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0454147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03377476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024386076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019628177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067156374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284783134","doi":"","title":"The role of international human rights law in the development of South Africa's legislation on juvenile justice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Democracy & Development","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Juvenile; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Juvenile court; Juvenile delinquency; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.02345015306475036,"score_gpt":0.29988317915099194,"score_spread":0.2764330260862416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284783134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043369487,0.038006116,0.014312497,0.1854746,0.0025536092,0.00023362879,0.00006843957,0.00006457015,0.715917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8539243,0.02703199,0.013947895,0.038434643,0.001097554,0.00042028207,0.0000730625,0.00012002831,0.06495026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949537,0.0019540687,0.0003867601,0.00052247476,0.0009342334,0.0012487352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99156404,0.005203749,0.0009947761,0.0006630291,0.00084833294,0.0007259907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015095772,0.0006210743,0.00038478294,0.0031719198,0.0066969064,0.0104482155,0.00093211234,0.004436648,0.0045473203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018686164,0.0005442192,0.00066776044,0.0028358866,0.024709625,0.009997091,0.008968354,0.011533694,0.00045168918],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032110127,0.000009810988,0.00027626965,0.000053175256,0.0000026481318,0.0001941847,0.007557818,0.00006694914,0.00019666864,0.9783731,0.0022626733,0.01100361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025804924,0.00006556021,0.0036813584,0.002154959,0.000022197131,0.0005533592,0.011348437,0.00029474887,0.001164098,0.32204223,0.6585964,0.000050831837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011830594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01298647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015095772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008153249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017332884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285540011","doi":"","title":"Compensating the Harms of Sexual and Domestic Violence: Tort Law, Insurance and the Role of the State","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Compensation (psychology); Harm; Liability; Government (linguistics); Business; Domestic violence; Damages; Actuarial science; Liability insurance; Law; Political science; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Psychology; Social psychology; Environmental health; Medicine","score_opus":0.00484831343702776,"score_gpt":0.25742322859302746,"score_spread":0.2525749151559997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285540011","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25802165,0.032031152,0.008519936,0.3543909,0.0004958096,0.00005686572,0.00009090757,0.00007324467,0.3463196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771335,0.0037977633,0.00065488456,0.0051951515,0.00014298667,0.00001303656,0.000010450484,0.000005364156,0.01304684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847645,0.00038312134,0.000042274838,0.000085971646,0.00041702445,0.00059510884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772114,0.0012414588,0.00035332295,0.00009374222,0.0003317228,0.00025861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019208796,0.0001762934,0.0002495426,0.0010885062,0.004538992,0.0063333465,0.0010282648,0.003895213,0.0021218795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034594398,0.00018780977,0.0003880069,0.0007211915,0.014684731,0.002974839,0.001832867,0.0024652025,0.00012421363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014753813,0.000015718988,0.004145379,0.00003375449,0.000008367405,0.000113555005,0.0017104688,0.00066987006,0.00008586292,0.9777085,0.0034095447,0.0120842485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005701406,0.000119615535,0.040394858,0.0010375291,0.00015391271,0.00041887176,0.010935859,0.011715105,0.0010515698,0.73178476,0.20220952,0.00012142449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5570393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67340493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5570393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02519242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023453472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89113873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288676574","doi":"","title":"Aboriginal land rights in Australia remains an unruly horse : aantekeninge","year":2009,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Tydskrif vir die suid-afrikaanse reg","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Colonisation; Resistance (ecology); Legislation; Treaty; Law; Political science; Indigenous rights; Psyche; Land reform; History; Ethnology; Human rights; Archaeology; Agriculture; Ecology","score_opus":0.03160331132602916,"score_gpt":0.3776349469851022,"score_spread":0.346031635659073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288676574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1833456,0.07345472,0.0008282878,0.22736631,0.0018961973,0.00006368221,0.000066778426,0.000042256837,0.5129362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61687803,0.025734091,0.0015303269,0.017411085,0.00047396173,0.000044168377,0.000031188476,0.00004562501,0.33785155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998423,0.00043679035,0.000040247625,0.000106398984,0.00052192964,0.0004717414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895716,0.00023095706,0.00007564767,0.00006442079,0.00035314276,0.00031871282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014242837,0.00017538031,0.00024272481,0.00053688145,0.014245596,0.005112281,0.0006391698,0.0023096337,0.006403375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025854276,0.00018600855,0.00017062237,0.0008594581,0.008004137,0.0036837745,0.0033320547,0.003406413,0.0005824299],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029739047,0.00009614028,0.0040879147,0.00034845163,0.000016221366,0.0019029551,0.31592605,0.00016488033,0.0009763532,0.45780164,0.11088999,0.10775967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003983602,0.000025497906,0.009246028,0.00039342398,0.000009267894,0.00035055363,0.07030927,0.00010186681,0.00016536619,0.01900313,0.9003685,0.00002315232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54128236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69268996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54128236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011917284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027767861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9228383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290727734","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2273251","title":"Putting the Train of Environmental Protection on Tracks: Nova Scotia's Experiment in Using Law to Strengthen Environmental Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Law; Environmental law; Political science; Engineering; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02211417667440575,"score_gpt":0.2738297278406412,"score_spread":0.25171555116623545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290727734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91530913,0.000105973544,0.00027014597,0.012400179,0.000179984,0.000321854,0.0002840495,0.000024467166,0.07110416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685128,0.0001246801,0.00065130007,0.006683916,0.000025527384,0.00019207572,0.0001269302,0.000019770236,0.023662983],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963941,0.001490945,0.00011841795,0.00041244805,0.0006676391,0.0009164053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983582,0.009295329,0.0010876262,0.0014004449,0.0019402456,0.0026943127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053879195,0.00034357977,0.00051454984,0.00046793118,0.014708927,0.0045344434,0.0015784657,0.004192211,0.0064130207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019017316,0.00048820185,0.00038370272,0.00087484065,0.005034697,0.0016496149,0.0032194208,0.004535718,0.0006695648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017092953,0.015594088,0.27400392,0.0007371997,0.0008634912,0.011526559,0.21296182,0.01019163,0.0171511,0.07791136,0.23605351,0.12591243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0056990106,0.006960693,0.45545003,0.000478275,0.000477761,0.00040226543,0.21327658,0.005328427,0.0061316136,0.0123308245,0.29310426,0.00036021875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90485895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97149605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09514105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017834509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031175068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19140267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291826599","doi":"","title":"Fluitjieblasers - is dit die huidige regering se erns?","year":2005,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Journal of South African Law / Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Dismissal; Honour; Political science; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.03097142147707586,"score_gpt":0.3028394684097316,"score_spread":0.2718680469326557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291826599","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010974135,0.031327426,0.0013121322,0.41784355,0.026461756,0.000047662394,0.00035649398,0.00039180694,0.51128495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08186733,0.015586307,0.0009363083,0.048163544,0.002819386,0.00003205428,0.0002555762,0.00026788062,0.85007155],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976439,0.00048169043,0.00008059095,0.00023928873,0.00087697123,0.00067753124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793833,0.00040503818,0.00020868058,0.00014908637,0.000655626,0.0006431929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017259307,0.00052060187,0.0005319435,0.00093676196,0.006347797,0.010366322,0.00071421074,0.004209849,0.07255712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064115534,0.00030458395,0.00034366985,0.0006683975,0.0036893776,0.006970569,0.0036890635,0.006043588,0.028954174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007179756,0.00010539547,0.0038070264,0.00018205408,0.00001135227,0.00069244445,0.0069961594,0.000075337404,0.0006699022,0.08899814,0.7791027,0.11928778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017776891,0.000010243504,0.0007158194,0.00013221997,0.0000019207735,0.00024387581,0.0036567925,0.000022341459,0.00013306865,0.0019377463,0.9931363,0.000008017828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0113202315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02265321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07255712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036281284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00378857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24272776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292627550","doi":"10.14288/1.0101865","title":"An examination of the use of the injunction in labour management disputes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Labour economics; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.026567003586823117,"score_gpt":0.20259171015498867,"score_spread":0.17602470656816555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292627550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8499302,0.0042958767,0.0012757727,0.005198351,0.000065345375,0.00022021889,0.00016733122,0.000012849009,0.13883404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964541,0.00081137783,0.0003103375,0.00028555896,0.0000143345405,0.00001748515,0.000033523705,0.000002656929,0.0020705203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97499835,0.005051894,0.0016009255,0.00081091357,0.013917734,0.003620173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9228615,0.040485557,0.012038551,0.0017250867,0.021390278,0.0014989693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01687703,0.00014575134,0.00036151925,0.008453017,0.0129868435,0.007616271,0.002055206,0.002095161,0.002103419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.077197164,0.0003444121,0.00041431276,0.01163068,0.01297452,0.0036664843,0.002664681,0.0029901736,0.00011604996],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023076212,0.00019423522,0.21870936,0.0012410537,0.00008019251,0.00418376,0.2906641,0.0010925716,0.0024218005,0.38454565,0.003497693,0.093138784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031463453,0.0001290927,0.6475985,0.0010152087,0.00012537235,0.002095802,0.20177129,0.0010012797,0.0015169297,0.00862976,0.1359484,0.00013695439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81112987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86508393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81112987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053240873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05838672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38629138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293281345","doi":"","title":"DEAL: : Hudbay/Augusta sets Canadian poison pill precedent.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International financial law review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Pill; Law; Business; Stock (firearms); Finance; Economics; Political science; History; Archaeology; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.018935859695237457,"score_gpt":0.33291499343366476,"score_spread":0.3139791337384273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293281345","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007636271,0.00549654,0.00048108547,0.07957918,0.0030280268,0.00026778635,0.0021485076,0.00022351545,0.9011391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.051124193,0.0015664507,0.0007488118,0.041875225,0.0003673192,0.000086493514,0.00042076764,0.000082646184,0.9037281],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964527,0.0001715975,0.00006869784,0.00036349596,0.0019164749,0.0010271234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958591,0.00069985515,0.000101792546,0.00014698679,0.0026896452,0.0005027025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022344869,0.0005809767,0.00039645063,0.0014567378,0.014799987,0.0057913167,0.0019143897,0.011632073,0.06859612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006668518,0.00067780993,0.0005464168,0.0012549716,0.0021383262,0.0018069777,0.0017292374,0.0066105532,0.007662709],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032657616,0.000023972661,0.0007211465,0.0000658764,0.000008423682,0.0004418651,0.0006006088,0.000058282494,0.00054172147,0.12024383,0.8673143,0.009947367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010485816,0.000009573503,0.0015245903,0.000054491946,0.000008255795,0.000059556354,0.00027712007,0.00007397191,0.00034264554,0.0012981071,0.9963224,0.00001886954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90200377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.945453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097996235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026393814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05424276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22947687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298454046","doi":"","title":"MAGAZINER, DANIEL R. – The Law and the Prophets: Black Consciousness in South Africa, 1968-1977","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Histoire sociale","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consciousness; Law; History; Legal consciousness; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.019627245885040535,"score_gpt":0.2582624003071181,"score_spread":0.23863515442207758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298454046","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037518956,0.3300371,0.00046508465,0.4591505,0.0069624097,0.00006392594,0.0005030389,0.00003809276,0.16526093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51649535,0.13960123,0.0006519601,0.03217081,0.002968957,0.000115263305,0.00014440213,0.000101142025,0.30775094],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995695,0.00017348661,0.00002392165,0.000047292877,0.000090254136,0.00009556996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870014,0.0008227893,0.00013498525,0.00003059044,0.00019587227,0.0001155458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012317237,0.00055837055,0.0002500122,0.0021915012,0.010760141,0.0033646196,0.0006615388,0.0047243587,0.00973502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031707936,0.00038727725,0.0001757315,0.0025252528,0.007007676,0.0058613247,0.0018331673,0.0048505673,0.0011230914],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019201642,0.000052735875,0.0028869745,0.00062999286,0.000022234894,0.0012689193,0.2187961,0.00011844204,0.0007591059,0.28174785,0.44106796,0.05245772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029289722,0.000020822874,0.008872656,0.00088464643,0.000011714576,0.0004249596,0.05294439,0.000027035348,0.000601425,0.013480824,0.92268395,0.000018286786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06644098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19637781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06644098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053470233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004610432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13210851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301857310","doi":"","title":"Legal Perspectives on Bullying","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Teacher: The National Education Magazine","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Context (archaeology); Statutory law; Duty; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Duty of care; Criminology; Sociology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.024739374411755076,"score_gpt":0.3539250215638901,"score_spread":0.32918564715213505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301857310","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024142528,0.075684726,0.0012353649,0.53335947,0.0022269227,0.000023093038,0.000077748,0.000018023615,0.36323217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74531704,0.079039045,0.00079764443,0.13300242,0.005090976,0.000073249634,0.00006148792,0.00003343368,0.036584668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953687,0.0018030836,0.00015397322,0.00028281088,0.001060602,0.0013308272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99429286,0.0036779782,0.0005451234,0.00010126634,0.00072232826,0.0006605071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044896887,0.00040179596,0.00037952926,0.0037542006,0.014998636,0.007647973,0.0014163669,0.011221448,0.007815105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0100766355,0.0002792663,0.0005554836,0.0019971328,0.036299273,0.004966994,0.004127234,0.009843348,0.000457945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005303676,0.00003339544,0.00059069303,0.00011522817,0.0000038280596,0.0009050584,0.026045231,0.00013100519,0.00010808768,0.9503376,0.015808135,0.0059164106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021922928,0.000052003656,0.0052695447,0.0023656618,0.000024241,0.0017201524,0.07093938,0.0002994485,0.00014072974,0.30020347,0.6189066,0.000056894125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19451785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11423524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19451785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015095765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009141799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38677126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2302058315","doi":"10.55016/ojs/sppp.v9i1.42564","title":"The False Panacea of City Charters? A Political Perspective on the Case of Toronto","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The School of Public Policy Publications","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Panacea (medicine); Perspective (graphical); Politics; Political science; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Medicine; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05650911666329846,"score_gpt":0.3820222489531011,"score_spread":0.32551313228980266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2302058315","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08060712,0.009591526,0.0016645663,0.48870844,0.0015399046,0.000060264952,0.0003012222,0.00004300752,0.4174839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87887084,0.003908926,0.0004821809,0.04372704,0.0006537968,0.000052691696,0.00009401734,0.00009611353,0.072114386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922321,0.0021778708,0.00012840104,0.0005447053,0.0012175825,0.0036992515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99545467,0.0016570091,0.0003738742,0.00018451156,0.000798405,0.0015315355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003886693,0.0005530453,0.00047384165,0.0009333653,0.0439331,0.017176958,0.0028159048,0.00906556,0.008805251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065066796,0.00062788423,0.0006067687,0.002302739,0.033212896,0.005301724,0.0044814036,0.013024958,0.0005321961],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013476166,0.000007917562,0.0009747632,0.000035067304,0.0000074199147,0.0008618353,0.045022164,0.00034489806,0.00008173064,0.8902011,0.060680673,0.001768944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029500681,0.000021420099,0.0061358963,0.0003423833,0.000046683686,0.0004959924,0.12390851,0.001431311,0.00026039587,0.041674525,0.8255064,0.00014697907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96239024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9756024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8452794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1547206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06578315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98040426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2309789829","doi":"","title":"Solidarity, Unconscionability, and Enforcement of Union Fines: Birch v. Union of Taxation Employees, Local 70030","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Enforcement; Law; Context (archaeology); Appeal; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.009316116154295692,"score_gpt":0.29197513476173365,"score_spread":0.282659018607438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2309789829","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37481913,0.0028948898,0.004482143,0.04481623,0.0002468178,0.00021738264,0.0003206512,0.000041489904,0.57216126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97410077,0.00037697324,0.00052060076,0.0047795433,0.00005068752,0.000070110465,0.000037190453,0.000009045283,0.02005505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890577,0.0020348611,0.00044115685,0.0010324715,0.003015605,0.004418122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99375266,0.0029707933,0.00091089203,0.00049263,0.0010877628,0.00078527204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006802507,0.00030485122,0.00049957336,0.0013709109,0.019298997,0.008953,0.002821959,0.016508074,0.0046015717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017491061,0.0007653218,0.0005238116,0.00172902,0.021817334,0.0031203597,0.0036327196,0.007277342,0.0004304005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006261974,0.00005555627,0.007706508,0.00004494225,0.00002591382,0.0010666677,0.0148866065,0.0004154365,0.00046326927,0.9614611,0.009982541,0.0038287174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066483085,0.00036982592,0.12120418,0.0013708078,0.0005542717,0.0017070019,0.08401025,0.0057361103,0.0057827923,0.4430123,0.33494875,0.00063889864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8255777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9118586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8255777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040881634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034667157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35089904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314409218","doi":"10.7202/1027106ar","title":"Denys-Claude Lamontagne, Jean Brisset des Nos, Le droit minier, 2 édition, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2005, 133 pages, ISBN 2-89400-203-3 Pierre Noreau, Le droit en partage : le monde juridique face à la diversité ethnoculturelle, Montréal, Éditions Thémis, 2003, 270 pages, ISBN 2-89400-178-9 Hubert Reid, Dictionnaire de droit québécois et canadien, 3 édition, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2004, 828 pages, ISBN 2-89127-682-3","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The Wilson Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.010431824984772829,"score_gpt":0.22607276224615724,"score_spread":0.21564093726138442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314409218","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010992254,0.6492867,0.0015381436,0.0390145,0.014311877,0.00006343917,0.001829012,0.00032523455,0.29253182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0076695043,0.28319928,0.0015112407,0.0070811086,0.0026248659,0.00007881385,0.0012370747,0.0004336499,0.69616437],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882835,0.00018819894,0.00008677423,0.00019739753,0.0006101857,0.000088969704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858487,0.00035713913,0.0001118654,0.00006673625,0.0007325277,0.00014680652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010044618,0.0012155107,0.0009242116,0.001976884,0.0025352042,0.005320383,0.001236618,0.0021214182,0.14371222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036451642,0.00064514275,0.0004426383,0.0047230492,0.001866863,0.005336071,0.0016502638,0.0032503803,0.06834724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017923527,0.00000985614,0.0002344191,0.00045277708,0.0000055814,0.000060285154,0.0010666678,0.00004691405,0.00017452441,0.0065884525,0.93152165,0.05982095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014673733,0.0000022166967,0.000490379,0.00021234251,0.0000016780798,0.000064490545,0.00032688252,0.000008302429,0.000031928033,0.00029745852,0.998558,0.000004826829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26646844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3496304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7335316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073948265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52983487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323710659","doi":"","title":"National Credit Act 34 of 2005: The Confusion Continues","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Confusion; Business; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law and economics; Credit card; Consumer protection; Credit card interest; Law; Finance; Political science; Economics; Commerce; Payment","score_opus":0.015980664395296117,"score_gpt":0.3125420838990526,"score_spread":0.2965614195037565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323710659","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01173388,0.029335862,0.003566109,0.5655216,0.007664206,0.00007211316,0.0008920959,0.00013787941,0.38107625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29954478,0.041929718,0.012694828,0.44688773,0.003634143,0.0004270334,0.0017102461,0.00025850913,0.19291297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846091,0.0036198501,0.0012208904,0.0019084493,0.007330906,0.001310779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884548,0.004274565,0.00085658516,0.00062979106,0.0050999653,0.00068438845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012233909,0.0004207154,0.00066919485,0.0022612885,0.0054835845,0.009336756,0.0030208735,0.008189781,0.0061604907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038919374,0.00033527214,0.00038323845,0.003617522,0.009620581,0.0069685625,0.0032094608,0.008839714,0.0027825586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018627528,0.000017268128,0.00087560626,0.00021623586,0.0000032173284,0.00014918325,0.0057365615,0.000090516936,0.000095688585,0.5962118,0.36019886,0.036386427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002942581,0.00000482687,0.0015955181,0.0009147787,0.000004001883,0.00011506248,0.0025102973,0.00009374545,0.0000650196,0.015243754,0.9794318,0.00001838077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15730461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1273632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15730461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018623998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040930554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.312778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325644776","doi":"","title":"Legislating Tolerance: Article 976 of the Civil Code of Quebec and its Application to Mixed-Income and Mixed-Use City Redevelopment Projects","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Redevelopment; Principle of legality; Hegemony; Political science; Subaltern; Sociology; Sustainability; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.02034303813196567,"score_gpt":0.27514719138808386,"score_spread":0.25480415325611816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2325644776","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.124432944,0.003955878,0.009340321,0.08360454,0.0007902703,0.0003087962,0.0003451426,0.00008091615,0.77714115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91267294,0.0012300642,0.00365503,0.010217026,0.00013377258,0.00022392481,0.000056472705,0.000042622956,0.071768075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931043,0.0019299501,0.00024942218,0.00056010595,0.0023753082,0.0017808892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99301004,0.0033403412,0.0005161219,0.0004128629,0.0021206292,0.0006001319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075531863,0.00038395447,0.00033142933,0.0014304523,0.015838083,0.010736656,0.0022872514,0.0075262114,0.0063639535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014880381,0.0004286232,0.00036410068,0.0023599805,0.02374809,0.003380665,0.004003914,0.006998581,0.00034250546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071827217,0.0000254544,0.0023691175,0.000041089526,0.0000042483834,0.0003489738,0.023320688,0.00049048214,0.00016836089,0.94962305,0.012640375,0.01096098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027855738,0.00007947008,0.031897306,0.001029651,0.000035505105,0.00049578183,0.07985124,0.003320964,0.0012988735,0.16743907,0.7142579,0.00026637252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9202772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9533861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07972282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051926587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06650454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37675548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327383966","doi":"10.1002/iir.1244","title":"Is the Unequal Treatment of Debtors in Natural Person Insolvency Law Justifiable?: A South African Exposition","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Debtor; Statutory law; Creditor; Legislature; Debt; Economics; Promotion (chess); Constitution; Asset (computer security); Business; Law; Law and economics; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.06275054775297945,"score_gpt":0.35479495410023204,"score_spread":0.2920444063472526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327383966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08640153,0.15979075,0.005690372,0.21189886,0.0017457262,0.00015748959,0.0000611889,0.000015122698,0.53423893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8983254,0.06151033,0.0011022945,0.016599806,0.0010989724,0.00013467312,0.000017874354,0.000010851025,0.021199914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702793,0.0018220148,0.00010594172,0.00015361012,0.00043092945,0.00045954823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701667,0.002153111,0.00033474996,0.00009515168,0.00031897106,0.000081341524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005810625,0.00028182764,0.0003919805,0.002037183,0.0038207378,0.004447696,0.00073790096,0.0033666508,0.0044590477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064491043,0.00019103436,0.00036220884,0.00247152,0.014437379,0.0035112214,0.0027486258,0.0037158276,0.000284362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072823855,0.000010829985,0.00023613672,0.00016806259,0.0000034452808,0.0001800275,0.004286147,0.00007850791,0.0001260506,0.98561007,0.002996598,0.006296895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047374728,0.00011236104,0.009070714,0.0055166264,0.000059642127,0.00064565253,0.018188369,0.0008661619,0.00087845884,0.46587813,0.49869812,0.000038297374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010123547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011486353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010123547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004973526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005532131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036085665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W232812854","doi":"","title":"FRUITS OF DEMOCRATIC TRANSFORMATION OF EDUCATION IN A SOUTH AFRICAN UNIVERSITY IN 1998: PERSPECTIVES OF STUDENTS IN THE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION, UNIVERSITY OF CAPETOWN","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Democracy; Witness; Humanities; Sociology; Political science; History; Politics; Art; Law","score_opus":0.07558711411738922,"score_gpt":0.3701898814563409,"score_spread":0.2946027673389517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W232812854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95286596,0.0016249917,0.00016959298,0.025254006,0.00014872265,0.000041709325,0.00004100019,0.000005101468,0.019848939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920447,0.00077543105,0.000061162405,0.0010663114,0.000039311348,0.000021054835,0.000008575049,0.0000057578723,0.005977681],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99491936,0.0024809926,0.00014530997,0.00023275871,0.0005715272,0.0016500697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99555403,0.0018036593,0.00067543564,0.00009827043,0.00037362924,0.0014950116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046907836,0.00053190393,0.00056513696,0.0014488988,0.038923576,0.015899712,0.0011404869,0.0028307524,0.004927867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055070748,0.00055126013,0.00031341857,0.0022644848,0.020553038,0.0057091434,0.007913927,0.008047236,0.00029095644],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017633167,0.00003773409,0.0026857925,0.000040564657,0.0000024596472,0.0006193297,0.9822152,0.00001910118,0.00033348097,0.010452834,0.001066078,0.0025097185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027402527,0.000020853593,0.0037008482,0.00006489686,0.000001791038,0.00010160386,0.97040737,0.000012034802,0.00016543902,0.00057827606,0.024935372,0.000008704378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046174183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08851734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046174183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017141823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013821812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1243732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329467884","doi":"10.7202/1027184ar","title":"Nicole Duplé, Droit constitutionnel : principes généraux, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2004, 603 pages, ISBN 2-89127-659-0 Patricia Hughes, Patrich A. Molinari (eds.), Participatory Justice in a Global Economy: the New Rule of Law / Justice et participation dans un monde global : la nouvelle règle de droit, Montréal, Éditions Thémis, 2004, 519 pages, ISBN 2-89400-195-9","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Citizen journalism; Economic Justice; Political science; Cartography; Law; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02170954771568927,"score_gpt":0.2837692787371545,"score_spread":0.26205973102146524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329467884","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028619662,0.8549092,0.0016889919,0.039951947,0.003583958,0.00003600594,0.00032373655,0.00013123245,0.09908885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010860318,0.72805077,0.0026956946,0.007335523,0.0022560237,0.00012187683,0.00043384617,0.00026583255,0.24798019],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987859,0.00031665034,0.0000801788,0.00021476345,0.0004898706,0.00011271301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990005,0.00042909815,0.00012348249,0.000054815402,0.00027484604,0.000117264164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012964872,0.0018749089,0.0009974161,0.0036981865,0.0030208188,0.0069059245,0.0019852084,0.00413504,0.0644404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002327954,0.0010606823,0.00051699224,0.00828304,0.0040079644,0.010559991,0.0021648123,0.0052755782,0.023543915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015118391,0.000013549402,0.00017848484,0.00065920723,0.0000101533,0.00008183922,0.0019625677,0.000116853786,0.00014587944,0.041493144,0.87930405,0.07601912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030387368,0.0000026200946,0.00037462646,0.00044659217,0.000002897637,0.000086586406,0.0005237522,0.000023609093,0.000045886514,0.0037738362,0.9947084,0.000008099466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1465523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22986011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1465523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013561933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008647263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29139853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337616990","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1395","title":"Book Review: Charter Conflicts. What is Parliament's Role?, by Janet L. Hiebert","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01055225528877959,"score_gpt":0.2842486700797144,"score_spread":0.2736964147909348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337616990","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020056631,0.46852058,0.00021729368,0.41618997,0.10139615,0.00005978973,0.00027054385,0.0000646557,0.013080419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0049233683,0.5417866,0.0006396454,0.20287195,0.11142553,0.00023858905,0.0005330338,0.00015010335,0.13743122],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952722,0.0016058665,0.00036637957,0.00030479787,0.0021719374,0.00027887762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96864724,0.0172325,0.002255584,0.00047324726,0.009881086,0.001510334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006587815,0.0011403533,0.0016427235,0.0050660297,0.0021848432,0.006028806,0.0023842438,0.008599389,0.017254869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0402084,0.0009430068,0.0006804733,0.0067085517,0.0026327018,0.004861914,0.0012866227,0.0068064616,0.0122787915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029325165,0.0000018489931,0.000015861322,0.00011879315,0.0000017706188,0.0000071276368,0.000020691445,0.000010481934,0.000007236201,0.00030735883,0.99393904,0.0055668107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010330617,0.000010238763,0.000509354,0.0014218927,0.000010465507,0.00006023828,0.00015060927,0.000036962072,0.00004096646,0.0010676478,0.9966684,0.000012827024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029139483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09415073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029139483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006847295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013038035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057939768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340695936","doi":"10.14288/1.0091101","title":"A critical engagement with Nancy Fraser’s theory of bivalent justice : implications for the BC Treaty Commission process","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Political science; Commission; Law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.027569242327750994,"score_gpt":0.2864396203832246,"score_spread":0.25887037805547364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340695936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019988272,0.007983546,0.027394196,0.30913243,0.0016642035,0.0001216516,0.000077257326,0.00004130982,0.63359714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.854907,0.0034167701,0.013721703,0.040450893,0.0011734657,0.00030976805,0.00005109226,0.00011801742,0.08585138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823585,0.009566561,0.00026640642,0.0013877943,0.0046030837,0.0018176466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908478,0.0061294497,0.00029353643,0.0004600451,0.001843837,0.0004253014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014728462,0.00049438665,0.00068803964,0.0020354367,0.02186877,0.012348789,0.0028436033,0.009080681,0.0036837799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020406371,0.00037006912,0.00064640836,0.0023436851,0.05157569,0.010169092,0.006013144,0.014083569,0.00043095538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001776115,0.0000021948415,0.000021101374,0.0000041527815,4.902316e-7,0.000015688554,0.003208628,0.00007433545,0.000010840914,0.9930199,0.002829778,0.0008109746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012784604,0.0000068065797,0.0001912713,0.00018679613,0.000003891866,0.00004749178,0.005987087,0.00091535086,0.00012732609,0.76616263,0.22632706,0.000031498737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36080036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3216073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6391996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05725776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03927226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71740055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343937585","doi":"","title":"Modernizing Pakistan's Blasphemy Law as Hate Speech","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blasphemy; Free speech; Political science; Law; First amendment; Supreme court","score_opus":0.021426760810418694,"score_gpt":0.3077349810378278,"score_spread":0.2863082202274091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343937585","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.082553215,0.0057667475,0.024225762,0.05296521,0.001784397,0.00012672138,0.00030631956,0.000183655,0.83208793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9479346,0.003016953,0.0038796852,0.008037783,0.0005533433,0.00007374175,0.00005107913,0.000018422064,0.03643433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987299,0.00032404668,0.00006288885,0.00020834897,0.00044205846,0.00023284895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817896,0.0006236601,0.00023909853,0.00026575843,0.0005619333,0.00013070881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019620003,0.00037090195,0.00013854376,0.00088082696,0.00499498,0.0054391176,0.0007798995,0.0044851922,0.0021566984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026251688,0.00027096827,0.0001977246,0.0005958785,0.021986486,0.0029595334,0.001683857,0.0058838236,0.00036209592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040749765,0.000010826375,0.00039384657,0.000013150849,9.617912e-7,0.0001025777,0.0032272,0.00022307852,0.00016467864,0.98455554,0.00475485,0.0065492587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030548817,0.00018034938,0.009137849,0.00055818056,0.00002512065,0.00071253715,0.008163867,0.0030287611,0.0025001855,0.54401654,0.43153745,0.000108565975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09059968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10116269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09059968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071495962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008704276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18014467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344652708","doi":"","title":"Costs in Statutory Derivative Actions: The Lingering Ghost of Wallersteiner","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Appeal; Derivative (finance); Discretion; Law; Action (physics); Shareholder; High Court; Covariant derivative; Common law; Companies Act; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Corporate law; Economics; Finance; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04458498226051166,"score_gpt":0.33994094728553076,"score_spread":0.2953559650250191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344652708","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07167845,0.030300079,0.016563172,0.40191895,0.0015790139,0.00006379914,0.0000572408,0.000065396365,0.4777739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83369553,0.008853153,0.006236015,0.06943591,0.0017711095,0.000099582154,0.000019088162,0.00012606493,0.07976346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889337,0.0042597763,0.00046950666,0.0015098955,0.003925877,0.0009012692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870595,0.010085163,0.0006837098,0.0007117367,0.0011385023,0.0003213306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011997274,0.0004015419,0.0005678526,0.001475258,0.006514128,0.01133606,0.001297261,0.009847066,0.002764736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0281783,0.0006024945,0.00042922507,0.0010678626,0.03337134,0.019665573,0.005279323,0.016786331,0.00039336047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036715949,0.0000030051508,0.00007217013,0.000016890042,0.0000016552599,0.000047460457,0.0024991953,0.000055484517,0.000038193168,0.9882239,0.005087864,0.003950404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017944938,0.00002628201,0.0007628323,0.0005663036,0.000013779477,0.00026213634,0.0032420957,0.0010096729,0.0005147778,0.77958196,0.21394575,0.00005653045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030352691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03230951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030352691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009985126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00853756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07244742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346395395","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i1.4518","title":"THE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHT TO HOUSING &amp; THE CANADIAN CHARTER: A CASE COMMENT ON TANUDJAJA V. CANADA (ATTORNEY GENERAL)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Human rights; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Covenant; Cultural rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.08000862500583227,"score_gpt":0.36071883352819145,"score_spread":0.2807102085223592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346395395","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09890631,0.016175607,0.0016404521,0.41165236,0.0034909707,0.000461656,0.0009863902,0.000135687,0.46655056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55887616,0.0068205954,0.0019249752,0.23014753,0.00074919657,0.00022998148,0.00027997128,0.00011967995,0.2008519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991148,0.00068950694,0.00015705815,0.00086295704,0.0031449671,0.003997455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997018,0.0009161518,0.00013662818,0.000071645176,0.0011496005,0.00070799375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036716298,0.00085800164,0.0006513198,0.0018175219,0.0497692,0.012329984,0.0040651113,0.020633286,0.0050120815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007243015,0.0009339565,0.0011322141,0.002808167,0.01298567,0.0020098905,0.0029139968,0.015799353,0.00035714338],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005960533,0.00007724589,0.005864896,0.0001741248,0.000045733865,0.0038171466,0.031049985,0.0007774505,0.00094367366,0.57088894,0.37462476,0.011676376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006731021,0.000050149283,0.013785728,0.00042663165,0.0001402258,0.0005582653,0.031243494,0.0012767114,0.0009733832,0.012542973,0.9385272,0.00040790974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13969418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13969418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22532313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2370276253","doi":"","title":"המידתיות החוקתית בדרום אפריקה (Constitutional Proportionality in South Africa)","year":2016,"lang":"he","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Constitutionality; Political science; Constitutional law; Law; Constitutional court; Normative; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Supreme court; Sociology; Constitution","score_opus":0.02384589623482796,"score_gpt":0.2929926217642545,"score_spread":0.26914672552942653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2370276253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17792343,0.027976941,0.010091151,0.04202267,0.001680111,0.0003153925,0.00021422416,0.0000489106,0.73972714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96277326,0.0031894785,0.00096898834,0.0015143802,0.00017098246,0.000090456924,0.000029826686,0.000019935153,0.031242646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825555,0.0007068838,0.00008244223,0.0002203287,0.0002562418,0.00047859352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992198,0.00040289064,0.00013442533,0.00006872207,0.00009112377,0.000082970095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028662318,0.00032625222,0.00020787952,0.0007777498,0.0048610033,0.0043393546,0.0005167895,0.0017135286,0.0077210544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043725735,0.00024281463,0.00025742702,0.0015840613,0.012348231,0.0048983023,0.0032223358,0.003158393,0.00030555218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019489857,0.000008025425,0.00033931967,0.00012990877,0.0000046722957,0.00036303164,0.01534049,0.00023486701,0.0003704869,0.968181,0.0033961285,0.011612576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049750783,0.000063104766,0.006154168,0.00079415936,0.000020333115,0.00075954595,0.024548933,0.00047220595,0.0017006161,0.3659854,0.5994056,0.000046196794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013219537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0138299465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013219537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007140635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058938256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05180919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2389641338","doi":"","title":"The application of the doctrine of proportionality in South African courts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Southern African Public Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Doctrine; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Statutory law; Constitutionality; Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Democracy; Politics; Supreme court; Constitution","score_opus":0.016155151990462698,"score_gpt":0.26983433229337395,"score_spread":0.25367918030291126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2389641338","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13615146,0.010888121,0.037153207,0.06887793,0.00060462975,0.00015943116,0.000064636006,0.00004438239,0.74605626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9694249,0.0026549208,0.0046766973,0.004045538,0.00016050595,0.00008986754,0.000007458737,0.000011346651,0.018928727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99351585,0.0032477512,0.00032492538,0.00056931085,0.0012592766,0.00108291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966059,0.002290374,0.00032977355,0.00026486276,0.00036701854,0.00014211154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006741569,0.00025153335,0.0003653658,0.001427627,0.007734561,0.008975278,0.001129061,0.004244766,0.0027048357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013844691,0.00051583693,0.00049004273,0.0016122068,0.022352759,0.007890245,0.006076477,0.006760821,0.00022176818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016294424,9.605765e-7,0.00005216646,0.0000057797406,0.000001061878,0.000050005154,0.001316408,0.00006945415,0.000040339994,0.99733883,0.00020147544,0.00092173804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024630139,0.000024161907,0.000821732,0.00031206384,0.000017547794,0.00021203642,0.0036380633,0.001248696,0.0007974023,0.90371275,0.0891572,0.000033791726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021553744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020907879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021553744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009479895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008342896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06878179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2399871532","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3671","title":"Law and development: Forty years after ‘Scholars in Self-Estrangement’","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Embeddedness; Field (mathematics); Political science; Relation (database); Law; Milestone; Sociology; Social science; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.009156073736940879,"score_gpt":0.22802735484153128,"score_spread":0.2188712811045904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2399871532","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009535057,0.10707784,0.0023189927,0.82266974,0.0068265963,0.000015945136,0.000025772444,0.00003429917,0.051495776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66820866,0.08965254,0.004440684,0.15592287,0.014225238,0.00012148869,0.00007354845,0.00019815213,0.067156754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97695255,0.015384341,0.00052346004,0.0016345682,0.0031965731,0.002308511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9707083,0.019822767,0.0011263886,0.002399185,0.00337481,0.0025685662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023554517,0.0004883491,0.0007339036,0.0021676847,0.010236121,0.021554107,0.0016839235,0.009017539,0.0032141504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02482997,0.00037474436,0.0005357601,0.003027819,0.0743422,0.023809193,0.008458834,0.015578828,0.0005982153],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012363272,0.000014482414,0.00025017752,0.00006390246,0.0000033525596,0.00009849901,0.031313077,0.000057245703,0.0000571048,0.92467946,0.02762912,0.015821202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008383166,0.00002411244,0.0006149083,0.0006843387,0.0000040429964,0.00008025455,0.022169193,0.00009387433,0.00014517,0.24235958,0.733794,0.00002213007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01623549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01736379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023554517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0230616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021259185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16732442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2412916127","doi":"","title":"Treatment Action Campaign (TAC) v South Africa (Minister of Health): reflections on the right to health care in Canada.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Right to health; Health care; Political science; Constitution; Action (physics); Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.08512447776085207,"score_gpt":0.34406506554057376,"score_spread":0.2589405877797217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2412916127","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02824587,0.01703909,0.0007272072,0.68928826,0.002122004,0.00010742513,0.00029722403,0.000028953145,0.26214397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53769875,0.009922945,0.0012219753,0.3499478,0.0006190577,0.00013847322,0.00011585319,0.000052968357,0.10028215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99334854,0.000986123,0.00017133003,0.00040939395,0.002053177,0.0030313635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956468,0.00236973,0.00021713886,0.000087127526,0.00089392764,0.0007852864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050135255,0.0004054661,0.00033980323,0.0010958486,0.031982984,0.008920553,0.001897926,0.016559232,0.006113581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014884182,0.00050436694,0.0005912897,0.001944929,0.015558869,0.0027013319,0.0038063147,0.019232243,0.0003443392],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003240715,0.000020372048,0.0013855649,0.00008644602,0.000018091561,0.0008263528,0.014540502,0.00015391296,0.0004158921,0.8551154,0.11953661,0.007868516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010773285,0.00003020663,0.010858672,0.00057455734,0.0000772358,0.00040243485,0.025117673,0.00041207144,0.0010782396,0.06286546,0.89830834,0.00016736414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97424525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9881362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077278525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.077278525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15031435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56069756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2413607570","doi":"","title":"Justice and justiciability: advancing solidarity and justice through South Africans' right to health jurisprudence.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Society for International Health","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Solidarity; Law; Justiciability; Political science; Constitutional court; Right to health; Sociology; Dignity; Economic Justice; Human rights; Politics; Constitution","score_opus":0.05336916577706501,"score_gpt":0.33027084816019603,"score_spread":0.276901682383131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2413607570","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0334907,0.04874007,0.024853364,0.4720967,0.0026950997,0.00015286916,0.000050951217,0.00005106914,0.41786924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9166297,0.00886466,0.007700575,0.033046596,0.00088312745,0.00020269475,0.000026014199,0.000051054907,0.032595713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882339,0.0073324773,0.00043985737,0.00084666273,0.0015679649,0.0015789972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904723,0.0076566376,0.00046222596,0.00044650017,0.00048345813,0.00047881284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021270396,0.00049798045,0.00058991177,0.0016725487,0.015132696,0.011081745,0.001376572,0.010338437,0.0030276808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020281486,0.000514516,0.00059572526,0.0010973905,0.079216585,0.011449325,0.010946576,0.015596152,0.00032066827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018661028,0.0000031214768,0.000037444595,0.00001572165,0.0000011188392,0.000057721416,0.007505564,0.000035808232,0.00006433163,0.98927736,0.0012277471,0.001772245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015995565,0.000015434849,0.00032605615,0.0003249828,0.000006479572,0.00010875884,0.0065567833,0.00020983217,0.00026197647,0.86569,0.12646393,0.00001964741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02508798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029509299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02508798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011592334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018430242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11248994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414841724","doi":"","title":"Motion to strike claim dismissed in HIV defamation suit.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Publishing; Law; Economic Justice; Motion (physics); Political science; Computer science; Medicine; Virology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03500197644132113,"score_gpt":0.2854225592911853,"score_spread":0.2504205828498642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2414841724","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067008756,0.008895965,0.002282296,0.35485858,0.01606499,0.0008373249,0.0019459755,0.00031007387,0.5477961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22475058,0.0024529214,0.001492271,0.35188767,0.0030780847,0.00038760307,0.000626812,0.00008843255,0.41523552],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99101186,0.00054313446,0.00043279293,0.0008352006,0.0033808372,0.0037962126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996558,0.0012330711,0.00020115111,0.00020675662,0.001013841,0.00078718853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040557724,0.0009545757,0.0010000451,0.0014553409,0.019759273,0.005700453,0.00328352,0.048333436,0.0092299115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017789986,0.0013149218,0.0017176954,0.0009698827,0.0034819627,0.0017666505,0.0036951469,0.022397477,0.0028164713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037255712,0.00025962645,0.007668051,0.00019742215,0.00021783145,0.017587818,0.010224005,0.00041507583,0.003894015,0.21272613,0.7270921,0.019345447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021701727,0.0002099936,0.015746294,0.0006204443,0.0002831851,0.0021111758,0.0045031137,0.0011460698,0.002050233,0.0141586345,0.9587465,0.00020736152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46257097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73119575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46257097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020859972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025744284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.919757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461480614","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3761","title":"The past and future of law and development","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Demise; Contextualization; Context (archaeology); Ethnocentrism; Political science; Law; Sociology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.00945480414423544,"score_gpt":0.2261087200482236,"score_spread":0.21665391590398816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461480614","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048773047,0.28792152,0.0041685645,0.49974003,0.0035656253,0.000016275228,0.00006488849,0.000070202215,0.19957565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6390201,0.23101474,0.007279577,0.07077161,0.006833647,0.00014450392,0.000099524594,0.00011471444,0.044721656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911004,0.0051914463,0.00029321533,0.0008658836,0.0013194438,0.0012296134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914909,0.004827313,0.0005221957,0.00085363584,0.0009372928,0.0013686449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008219721,0.00051170547,0.0006141075,0.0034094772,0.0089098215,0.020248743,0.0014226434,0.0059782555,0.0067068865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077230935,0.00030233458,0.0003927778,0.0039861077,0.050886296,0.023365313,0.008047046,0.008074402,0.0009001581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060561865,0.000007777588,0.00022534782,0.000078882294,0.0000025288061,0.000040132938,0.0038764658,0.000043947253,0.00002721509,0.96954286,0.011482277,0.014666643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003411753,0.000014719044,0.00048172887,0.0006544806,0.0000025012532,0.00009329384,0.00829107,0.000121953446,0.00004307362,0.383206,0.6070742,0.000013547384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010880409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013624764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020248743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01502715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016440101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10903013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2462379764","doi":"","title":"Official coordinates, lawfully established monuments and South African cadastral surveys","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GEOMATICA","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Cadastre; Art; Political science; Geography; Cartography","score_opus":0.016114930232509445,"score_gpt":0.2735156286909459,"score_spread":0.2574006984584365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2462379764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7497413,0.008289213,0.02677612,0.0034046576,0.0003087879,0.00041664345,0.011775539,0.0001219035,0.19916585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97263026,0.0022485135,0.0078363,0.00009461171,0.000032242242,0.00016321235,0.0016093779,0.000028256924,0.015357223],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960257,0.0018967061,0.00032080733,0.00039411534,0.00088860845,0.00047401982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99147487,0.002650935,0.0030357533,0.00095289416,0.0016800745,0.00020544635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036880053,0.00031526733,0.00024737505,0.0046377014,0.0013644905,0.0019358487,0.00061241275,0.0002915293,0.010380376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027130838,0.0003653573,0.0001947372,0.012124172,0.0018640502,0.0021407013,0.0023599064,0.00035537203,0.000714399],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041772967,0.00003814349,0.45342642,0.0016249161,0.00011082709,0.00061275635,0.019723585,0.006638458,0.00085755816,0.1987634,0.013835029,0.3039512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022593002,0.000092283444,0.7897241,0.001210727,0.00007611973,0.00043133175,0.030398397,0.0031163674,0.0012165459,0.012779098,0.16087489,0.000057542962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09599126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23019823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09599126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031144635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036462452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19086504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2462575549","doi":"10.25159/2520-9515/875","title":"A PROPOSED MODEL FOR THE APPOINTMENT AND DISMISSAL OF THE NATIONAL COMMISSIONER OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law Society and Development","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presidency; Cabinet (room); Law; Constitution; Politics; Dismissal; Interim; Political science; History","score_opus":0.07855212467861385,"score_gpt":0.346102545491675,"score_spread":0.2675504208130612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2462575549","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45922512,0.0013032007,0.017595883,0.022129145,0.0002481434,0.00067950814,0.00053121796,0.000048481208,0.4982393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98095644,0.00045197504,0.003527183,0.00070601574,0.000028342696,0.00031477655,0.00018814405,0.000025389905,0.013801817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99502075,0.0028982153,0.000111215755,0.0005430439,0.0003639273,0.0010627875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881859,0.0068630753,0.0016688473,0.0004787766,0.0017586898,0.0010447553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074183596,0.0005261006,0.00045244696,0.0049382267,0.008173139,0.012085449,0.0030198798,0.004072417,0.039262652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016365224,0.00045023597,0.00074447185,0.0059219305,0.009998526,0.015492379,0.003382261,0.0026145657,0.0016792789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076024924,0.00035507046,0.022646256,0.00009280613,0.000013441085,0.0005756955,0.053541027,0.00048551755,0.00011821372,0.91160524,0.0030373754,0.007453311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017157647,0.0003117246,0.06370129,0.00088295445,0.00010499106,0.0006891516,0.6542126,0.010901951,0.00035359376,0.18486789,0.08371384,0.00008843124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07031175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06695361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07031175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018463427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013077055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13980502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2462916037","doi":"","title":"New tools for governance.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hospitals & health networks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Business; Process management; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.01905586065075743,"score_gpt":0.3444528136043358,"score_spread":0.32539695295357834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2462916037","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028746086,0.034984805,0.042711142,0.25369948,0.0032494187,0.00009936406,0.0002285821,0.00029571948,0.6618569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63765275,0.032801375,0.056242462,0.026010055,0.0039508003,0.00079554354,0.0004481877,0.00044401383,0.2416548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939585,0.0034420504,0.0003104676,0.00057600194,0.001179823,0.0005332291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99269307,0.0037001728,0.00046391154,0.0014757117,0.00095659686,0.00071049377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010523052,0.00087502156,0.0005238623,0.0025896514,0.0050712815,0.015192995,0.0012666133,0.005362904,0.028525341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01679914,0.00056633615,0.000528973,0.002483871,0.032294523,0.026885003,0.006528472,0.006821403,0.0041499687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020291625,0.0000036535205,0.00005502966,0.000027717688,0.0000018093243,0.000017355545,0.00093358976,0.000044502623,0.0000235987,0.9778855,0.013332943,0.007672275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005328749,0.0000049813375,0.00013909972,0.000257354,0.000003418765,0.000049237617,0.0016057574,0.0001756605,0.00006329879,0.692277,0.30541283,0.0000060019906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004806127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006730575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028525341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007084008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075043174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0954268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2464272941","doi":"","title":"Sexual Orientation and the Charter: The Achievement of Formal Legal Equality (1985-2005) and Its Limits","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Portal (King's College London)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Sexual orientation; Political science; Orientation (vector space); Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.06029180085866842,"score_gpt":0.3840803329675603,"score_spread":0.32378853210889186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2464272941","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30455494,0.03894732,0.0018523643,0.12220081,0.0022080867,0.00016247811,0.00048515844,0.00006479405,0.5295241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8891511,0.0071422393,0.00069873035,0.015253351,0.0002716894,0.00004089624,0.00014861733,0.00002216087,0.08727128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968887,0.00042110658,0.000101334066,0.00024853463,0.0010782919,0.0012619789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975828,0.0006103732,0.00036077076,0.00007067211,0.0005523039,0.00082303165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029728792,0.00019227515,0.0002332557,0.0011501438,0.015330175,0.009329631,0.0013880085,0.0035374947,0.0028145288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007936001,0.00030536318,0.0002285472,0.0018790262,0.0120051615,0.0031227549,0.0032602686,0.0065239947,0.00018589296],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027041806,0.00007993669,0.0074018743,0.00006029474,0.0000046921577,0.00036917187,0.04383013,0.0001766077,0.00016412567,0.8466834,0.04441046,0.056792222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011937795,0.000064466825,0.095745094,0.0006960854,0.00001698179,0.00025019803,0.058202203,0.0003629148,0.0006889386,0.024541413,0.8193449,0.00007490117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90459853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96727777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90459853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06058363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.073994815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43956703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2466951685","doi":"10.14288/1.0077700","title":"Consumer protection in the condominium purchase : the purchaser's perspective","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Business; Advertising; Marketing; Commerce; Computer science","score_opus":0.013718250186556641,"score_gpt":0.23113242620143473,"score_spread":0.21741417601487809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2466951685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13447182,0.012315752,0.0028513214,0.24464376,0.0004592739,0.00008014528,0.00015551451,0.00001933842,0.60500306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9691683,0.0042512347,0.00058301847,0.009730802,0.0003121066,0.00001808569,0.000023796827,0.00001108749,0.015901672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.994191,0.0016757926,0.00008763684,0.00034775672,0.0016816602,0.002016178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924489,0.0044293553,0.000575086,0.0002104443,0.0015549046,0.00078127603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005226263,0.0003448897,0.00058639445,0.0023854044,0.014049842,0.01133426,0.001723626,0.010549668,0.008451735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008155011,0.00041335946,0.0006232039,0.0022501564,0.03332954,0.004989485,0.002532282,0.006969833,0.0003558638],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025474072,0.000055445136,0.0028648851,0.00007321195,0.000008971171,0.00075456564,0.030708984,0.00024310764,0.00019968713,0.9539092,0.004842989,0.00631342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085120344,0.0002608981,0.03860016,0.0022811354,0.00013086927,0.0018175144,0.19014156,0.0016351774,0.0012262766,0.27822775,0.4853723,0.00022139389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6430577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61375034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3569423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034617253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039008915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71808875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2481399373","doi":"10.1017/s000202060002713x","title":"Abdullahi A. An-Na'im, ed. Cultural Transformation and Human Rights in Africa. London: Zed Books, 2002. Distributed by St. Martin's Press, x + 269 pp. Tables. Notes. References. Index. $69.95. Cloth. $27.50. Paper. - Abdullahi A. An-Na'im, ed. Human Rights under African Constitutions. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2003. x + 434 pp. Index. Price not reported. Cloth.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Studies Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.046417513727015164,"score_gpt":0.3142752774659616,"score_spread":0.26785776373894643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2481399373","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013978955,0.97851664,0.00014930457,0.0054722647,0.00090316404,0.000009191377,0.00009353646,0.000015946354,0.014700119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002498316,0.9667566,0.00039252243,0.0007912213,0.000448956,0.000022250457,0.00010801066,0.000017450531,0.0289647],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994955,0.00015656512,0.000042960462,0.0000530832,0.00019240915,0.000059374892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929523,0.00032534022,0.000113096175,0.000023434484,0.00016281594,0.00008002942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010191066,0.001751181,0.001126679,0.0035597135,0.001287956,0.0025128317,0.0010483379,0.0016012928,0.043715045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016551496,0.00087092444,0.0004762834,0.006214848,0.001284962,0.0055216374,0.0011251384,0.0021101788,0.02222302],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034089615,0.0000242094,0.00045522486,0.0032237673,0.000022460246,0.00017856095,0.0015312271,0.0001423536,0.00022667977,0.009944894,0.78574663,0.19846997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006375965,0.000011166927,0.0009206927,0.0026759875,0.000010876966,0.00033410775,0.00078792754,0.00002447502,0.00007173426,0.0031977326,0.99195063,0.000008226189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014810747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028600447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043715045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002131225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032173311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14624137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2482086321","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v36i3.11595","title":"RECONSIDERING THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF MUNICIPAL COUNCILS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Constitution; Legislature; Political science; Privilege (computing); Law; Legislation; Power (physics); Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.29612549673656535,"score_gpt":0.32522373823901013,"score_spread":0.029098241502444777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2482086321","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21314344,0.00609483,0.0046888823,0.4777443,0.0016228391,0.00013398349,0.0001638364,0.000069189344,0.29633877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9465058,0.0011346191,0.0014382536,0.021363145,0.0004903291,0.00006969131,0.00003762197,0.000030333314,0.028930223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864856,0.0043905936,0.0008931548,0.0009123547,0.00204468,0.0052735577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98563206,0.0069045196,0.0011813857,0.0015734386,0.0023031621,0.0024054023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01584238,0.0002933728,0.0005438982,0.0013874817,0.0162169,0.011096868,0.0020921135,0.009219422,0.007104382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032447975,0.0005433573,0.00056152715,0.00114836,0.029099867,0.009170944,0.010182183,0.010516837,0.00069901004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017059916,0.000026539388,0.002336304,0.000058866506,0.0000073242704,0.00037362686,0.030228056,0.00017316338,0.0004855677,0.9424371,0.013381592,0.010474733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058721937,0.000072365176,0.011921824,0.0010579232,0.000051761766,0.00046965433,0.05874806,0.0005539504,0.0012817851,0.22714622,0.6985278,0.00010992894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13256471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22280604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13256471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02040027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03561241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26358622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2487492641","doi":"","title":"Passing on the Torch of Learning in the 'Primordial Soup' of Construction Law: Reflections from the Construction Law Academic Forum, 2012","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Legal education; Management; Political science","score_opus":0.06496778071295242,"score_gpt":0.36258825817781354,"score_spread":0.2976204774648611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2487492641","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05620096,0.008811667,0.0019108331,0.8666071,0.017193776,0.0000974096,0.00010721128,0.00009710314,0.04897397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62463665,0.009279676,0.0018934509,0.19172241,0.009147939,0.0005472158,0.00012828693,0.00061309966,0.1620313],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97701263,0.0151812015,0.0002998907,0.00088962534,0.0021810513,0.0044356855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98578936,0.0063287257,0.0006846754,0.00042241727,0.0013346582,0.0054402878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021345885,0.0011447094,0.0010530099,0.001627116,0.05422369,0.029137697,0.0041304245,0.020090124,0.010100771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029982701,0.0009982954,0.0010854247,0.0020013752,0.032815453,0.016767524,0.020454735,0.032789074,0.0014143364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006669172,0.00018405289,0.00057229085,0.00016106038,0.00000770568,0.00064306235,0.70045805,0.000080301616,0.0002897702,0.0432502,0.23953791,0.014748924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017003253,0.000033380024,0.00094694505,0.00037392534,0.0000041852136,0.000118259195,0.41945285,0.00007453849,0.00012575703,0.004039802,0.5747697,0.000043636846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031085597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.067282684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05422369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02064786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02547429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14981145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2491292666","doi":"10.1163/2211906x-00502005","title":"Reflections on the Supreme Court of Ghana, written by Samuel Kofi Date-Bah","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.08444552360252398,"score_gpt":0.40682011618498515,"score_spread":0.32237459258246115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2491292666","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065263333,0.018838024,0.00020705277,0.9468239,0.013039822,0.000031658084,0.00010045712,0.00000902664,0.014423755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10045874,0.010725885,0.0006049644,0.82617706,0.009264765,0.000121155914,0.000052877633,0.00014835403,0.05244616],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99444526,0.0019838116,0.00030978036,0.0006888073,0.0007493426,0.0018230111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876244,0.009415168,0.00048817962,0.00017450575,0.001186638,0.0011111393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010215894,0.00089091115,0.0013725032,0.0012308072,0.030237928,0.014874776,0.0029482548,0.047725253,0.006828455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026810296,0.0011952599,0.0009979778,0.0019858577,0.018864095,0.01076693,0.004712517,0.061598297,0.0009857969],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011088615,0.000039529947,0.00054681255,0.00020043744,0.000039072016,0.0030549872,0.0339584,0.00018812393,0.0005834411,0.17028825,0.786153,0.004837065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009069606,0.00003070979,0.002141162,0.0015130534,0.000043694057,0.00050834776,0.05312842,0.00015835545,0.0007408432,0.05833929,0.8831909,0.00011453276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12786941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25504532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12786941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015865503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2542503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2492672834","doi":"10.22158/wjssr.v3n3p352","title":"Public Transportation in South Africa: Challenges and Opportunities","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Journal of Social Science Research","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Public transport; Government (linguistics); Poverty; Public policy; State (computer science); Public administration; Inequality; Economic growth; Political science; Bus rapid transit; Transportation infrastructure; Business; Economics; Engineering; Transport engineering; Law","score_opus":0.38062263090240117,"score_gpt":0.4282627552406466,"score_spread":0.04764012433824544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2492672834","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.117173955,0.08517586,0.0021928388,0.7163808,0.0014298033,0.00007250546,0.00026067664,0.000039663613,0.07727401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8628894,0.1111146,0.0019149046,0.010110639,0.0011786555,0.00011767256,0.00017281229,0.00001896932,0.012482264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981933,0.0006420811,0.00008893434,0.00012576103,0.00018835752,0.0007615614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984969,0.0006218006,0.00023179992,0.000046955513,0.00020604604,0.00039655063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024050807,0.0003698559,0.0002888682,0.0015759637,0.0071915267,0.007421264,0.001112361,0.004484468,0.011273735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026853585,0.00025959595,0.00039980284,0.003277391,0.0055877706,0.009335437,0.0061221137,0.002935951,0.00058869465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009245408,0.00015410785,0.01344777,0.0035293675,0.00003383196,0.0062210653,0.044950947,0.0028774492,0.0019481297,0.6851329,0.039137892,0.20247406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016376009,0.00010350114,0.014949241,0.003870195,0.000028729692,0.0028253223,0.27141488,0.0016994644,0.00054852053,0.10355419,0.6008926,0.00009700221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032000054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034127545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032000054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006560168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016559217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0636276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2499526531","doi":"10.29173/alr108","title":"Comparing Aboriginal and Other Duties to Consult in Canadian Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Charter; Jurisprudence; Law; Constitution; Political science; Section (typography); Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.037624990442016455,"score_gpt":0.3629828335306127,"score_spread":0.3253578430885963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2499526531","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20694333,0.012782597,0.0009364979,0.024004577,0.00022250586,0.00010145157,0.0002273061,0.000029455497,0.7547523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9559039,0.008670162,0.00074611534,0.0038577847,0.000072136405,0.00003996239,0.00009774101,0.000022677696,0.030589577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98861325,0.0009904981,0.0002710734,0.00047692293,0.005601267,0.004047004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990078,0.0035340122,0.00070190325,0.00029651064,0.004378543,0.0010109831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059720897,0.00028200826,0.00039141218,0.0072763013,0.028274128,0.01043226,0.0020135494,0.0027062627,0.005892622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016189303,0.00036343987,0.00043933527,0.009021887,0.0155756995,0.0025845943,0.00359666,0.0037668862,0.00023196625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003442039,0.00003766184,0.0066316994,0.00016966368,0.00002080678,0.0005438379,0.07748822,0.00040876862,0.00039596227,0.8809949,0.009729893,0.023544148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054789,0.00007515384,0.13538715,0.0012499137,0.00018382505,0.00065529183,0.17314433,0.0010323838,0.0009866644,0.044715952,0.64223915,0.00027532372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9924871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99611294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16229023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16229023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16289392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9716246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510241885","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.43.1.133","title":"Changing Family Forms, Patterns and Emerging Challenges Within the South African Indian Diaspora","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nuclear family; Diaspora; Context (archaeology); Extended family; Colonialism; Politics; Democracy; Sociology; Gender studies; Family life; Flexibility (engineering); Political economy; Development economics; Political science; History; Anthropology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.13226223015817212,"score_gpt":0.3759100507220304,"score_spread":0.24364782056385825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510241885","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974396,0.00029225624,0.000061431005,0.00032380404,0.0000035079809,0.000007398932,0.000016071734,0.0000013667851,0.0018543926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99899036,0.00045785285,0.00005278228,0.00002456433,0.0000021370117,0.0000059924714,0.000009130859,0.0000014613207,0.00045572346],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992095,0.00031276568,0.000030894014,0.00008947839,0.00007486373,0.00028249717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991222,0.00026081796,0.00022533198,0.000056992027,0.000101655,0.00023306752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010185257,0.00014145167,0.00019241766,0.0013090444,0.0063629556,0.0028319492,0.00052716123,0.00035488504,0.0019984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002900695,0.00019813339,0.000118579745,0.0015950038,0.0040749246,0.001989702,0.0027422926,0.0008642059,0.0001576604],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053184966,0.0000569376,0.11750336,0.000059662347,0.000012648932,0.0031617854,0.8528701,0.00008728371,0.0011453871,0.004709252,0.0004091592,0.019931236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017792813,0.000028719374,0.1602273,0.0000712572,0.0000064249134,0.0011182462,0.83127016,0.00006557938,0.00012959591,0.0006214312,0.0064423485,0.000017115204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041250445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09451624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041250445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027771986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020109352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08202064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516362872","doi":"10.53386/nilq.v67i1.94","title":"Stormont House Agreement: Model Implementation Bill","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council; Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Econometrics; Economics","score_opus":0.018840458857021965,"score_gpt":0.31808359846222845,"score_spread":0.2992431396052065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516362872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006615562,0.00014836156,0.0063191545,0.046123106,0.0027439604,0.0025443377,0.0049167704,0.0020584334,0.9285303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03643272,0.00012735552,0.004360101,0.029073818,0.00052059034,0.0019550037,0.0028146794,0.00060323055,0.9241125],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9708439,0.004659772,0.0011264696,0.0014877755,0.016070288,0.0058118035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9675359,0.008000034,0.0008811517,0.0039946777,0.016586008,0.0030022135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020534884,0.0006852667,0.00092081405,0.0018850385,0.0068501877,0.014245408,0.0059465854,0.02236254,0.17821437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053726047,0.0015845244,0.0017970172,0.0018675865,0.0022492185,0.007253954,0.0046135276,0.010490438,0.066401534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001560941,0.00028327084,0.0007027495,0.000105829684,0.000015692749,0.00018216438,0.00041763153,0.0006512027,0.00048094583,0.13525398,0.8498005,0.011949886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002788993,0.0001412847,0.0039282595,0.00029560187,0.00003054322,0.000097517644,0.00066418445,0.0016847024,0.0011420898,0.017382842,0.97424984,0.0001041052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.081662685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.108905315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17821437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015650906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05501018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59618646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517233587","doi":"","title":"The adjudication of customs' tariff classification disputes in South Africa : lessons from Australia and Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Tariff; Tribunal; Adjudication; Duty; Position (finance); Rules of origin; Business; International trade; Dispute resolution; Law; Political science; International trade law; Finance","score_opus":0.05479371487939794,"score_gpt":0.2720279670312292,"score_spread":0.2172342521518313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517233587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5140537,0.014388726,0.0017639345,0.07396042,0.00039485845,0.00048887415,0.00021785028,0.000030429317,0.39470115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94043535,0.010094618,0.0034206873,0.0062268856,0.00004541874,0.00012414288,0.00008232118,0.000034957353,0.039535504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935323,0.0013695185,0.00026936238,0.0003644143,0.0019290905,0.00253534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893595,0.003964197,0.00044848258,0.00030816466,0.004390779,0.0015287743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067799487,0.00032660482,0.0004381619,0.0022044133,0.025201838,0.0083993245,0.0020979834,0.0023458581,0.002880103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017131021,0.00049065315,0.00049424457,0.0035133609,0.007112099,0.002752424,0.0048134676,0.004313375,0.00015096908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002126508,0.00019685469,0.030929621,0.0009529004,0.000114417366,0.008698385,0.2969211,0.0017793687,0.001516699,0.4879709,0.039351504,0.13135558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012262086,0.00010827632,0.11395262,0.0031079166,0.00025200125,0.0014422435,0.33754838,0.0027415054,0.0020279007,0.02698478,0.51131004,0.0004017482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9901736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08875762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08875762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18864456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6439846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519724377","doi":"","title":"Victim policies and criminal justice on the road to restorative justice, E. Fattah and S. Parmentier : book review","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta criminologica","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Restorative justice; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.12622316862556424,"score_gpt":0.35927118255432017,"score_spread":0.23304801392875593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519724377","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000100867335,0.9876747,0.00006598376,0.008051254,0.0014919636,0.0000032588548,0.000008716325,0.0000036123565,0.0025996484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016770269,0.98911536,0.000118069605,0.002293126,0.0016773466,0.000009132474,0.00001776219,0.000004948029,0.0050872676],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994572,0.00017720621,0.000032812444,0.00006074096,0.00021731274,0.000054793567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986507,0.0009040785,0.00011368308,0.000021485945,0.00024844974,0.00006156674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010308606,0.00089304266,0.0010290624,0.0022981437,0.0010239849,0.0032734647,0.00076619635,0.0025979101,0.0066676964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026044522,0.00046636348,0.00034973404,0.004685101,0.0025943592,0.004779702,0.0011835261,0.0023467557,0.0020267197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045178873,0.00005583455,0.0003492936,0.005984124,0.000040587853,0.00018107829,0.00083067303,0.00044728298,0.00025759972,0.047224235,0.61649585,0.32808828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007644281,0.000024723175,0.001539924,0.0051213494,0.000017798962,0.00030335135,0.0005703302,0.000052692547,0.00009513919,0.010852935,0.9813998,0.000014280688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009874427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016642097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009874427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002139457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004916682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022305667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521054874","doi":"","title":"East Africa Law Society, Eals Practice Manual Series – Number 3, The Constitutionnal Law Digest, Nairobi, Law Africa Publishing, 2005","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Publishing; Interpretation (philosophy); Ethnology; Humanities; Sociology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02209106361165802,"score_gpt":0.30401797350563853,"score_spread":0.2819269098939805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521054874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006615626,0.05079775,0.0094423285,0.027726715,0.0028696437,0.0014827106,0.01949013,0.0015303212,0.88004476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014702608,0.027240882,0.009444488,0.002285335,0.00032573153,0.0009814173,0.007605734,0.00051123387,0.9369026],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986663,0.00028949633,0.0002931623,0.00011698593,0.00052379485,0.00011015604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953467,0.0016851587,0.0004269612,0.00054595154,0.0017474082,0.00024783565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004340852,0.0007749637,0.00040423268,0.004611471,0.0027148228,0.0039167358,0.000998645,0.0020574909,0.1170811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013869472,0.0012228831,0.00017427793,0.007388949,0.0012376274,0.005756515,0.0016394445,0.0018899865,0.055395998],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001664838,0.00005619033,0.0008909138,0.00027287676,0.0000019776844,0.00005241737,0.0014648705,0.00010461736,0.00033477394,0.014672221,0.8530442,0.12908837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004764754,0.000007931414,0.0021038738,0.00035992678,0.0000013582425,0.000059060472,0.0005929409,0.00004549729,0.000103111204,0.0013591527,0.9953572,0.000005088663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040485863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0926433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1170811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003133982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010958063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3916753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523307492","doi":"","title":"Magnus Killander (dir.), International Law and Domestic Human Rights Litigation in Africa, Cape Town, Pretoria University Law Press, 2010","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Cape; Human rights; Political science","score_opus":0.012774952310499077,"score_gpt":0.2542703782032494,"score_spread":0.2414954258927503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523307492","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010122734,0.68715614,0.00048606197,0.26640972,0.017414108,0.000057209178,0.00040562527,0.000084798885,0.026974062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03763807,0.7085196,0.0010858692,0.073040724,0.01923793,0.0003500043,0.00039186326,0.00018941246,0.15954655],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978114,0.00063344307,0.00022549479,0.00023902529,0.00078033924,0.0003103491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99536324,0.0032157092,0.0004961224,0.00006086256,0.000545794,0.00031821863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027169255,0.00177742,0.000896413,0.0034006177,0.0056031616,0.005228978,0.0014239101,0.009603404,0.017709088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008624178,0.0010934762,0.00038947465,0.0041218325,0.0027031011,0.0074982927,0.0019164617,0.0063790297,0.0073343227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002658693,0.0000142288,0.0002784399,0.000415501,0.000008214329,0.00016839824,0.0011386693,0.00007805879,0.00008911916,0.0130763035,0.9514022,0.033304278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024638195,0.00002008749,0.0054744636,0.0013816138,0.000016505643,0.0002967803,0.0023800756,0.00013123908,0.00028153905,0.009766804,0.9801695,0.000056854093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09733167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2197459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09733167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00553528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005133595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19353026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523355058","doi":"10.1093/jeclap/lpw056","title":"South Africa: The Criminalisation of Cartel Conduct","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Competition Law & Practice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cartel; Legislation; Competition (biology); Business; Imprisonment; Organised crime; Competition law; Collusion; International trade; Political science; Law; Economics; Market economy; Monopoly","score_opus":0.0844969108818255,"score_gpt":0.3411680185562723,"score_spread":0.25667110767444684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523355058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47391728,0.013316801,0.001772342,0.06297688,0.00048686357,0.0003450653,0.00025179933,0.000033873403,0.44689912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92427814,0.0073671285,0.0007399384,0.013037442,0.00007995481,0.0000864963,0.00006659572,0.000024841327,0.054319467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983126,0.00040401242,0.00009600273,0.00015967964,0.00033830787,0.0006894034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997701,0.0009495025,0.00062404433,0.00013047663,0.0002943568,0.00030065156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015205344,0.00033895602,0.0001888178,0.001495401,0.008913375,0.0030356422,0.000565322,0.0027975105,0.011056346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00563712,0.00034605412,0.00021843525,0.0017604126,0.0052751326,0.002593835,0.0036610027,0.003251476,0.0007468723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014262286,0.00007743274,0.038994864,0.0012631872,0.000052539417,0.027342442,0.28143087,0.00028675701,0.0045099747,0.4543987,0.065145716,0.12635487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031538075,0.00007020402,0.088039346,0.0029823168,0.00004489819,0.011355115,0.13042468,0.00029907573,0.002531274,0.020033296,0.74410003,0.00008819945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0600781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10264392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0600781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039351345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007394116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11945677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523838823","doi":"10.1080/17533171.2016.1223613","title":"“Apartheid in a parka”? Roots and longevity of the Canada–South Africa comparison","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Safundi","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada; Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry","keywords":"Oppression; Context (archaeology); Face (sociological concept); Foundation (evidence); Public policy; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; History; Politics; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.02618631270289475,"score_gpt":0.2793362613583213,"score_spread":0.25314994865542656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523838823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8191544,0.005744675,0.00049083534,0.01743845,0.00006501374,0.000028735578,0.0001720039,0.00001282906,0.15689299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99513173,0.00081086607,0.000097495926,0.00024075399,0.0000039923343,0.000003934369,0.000012213315,0.00000637286,0.0036925946],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845135,0.00021024447,0.000029382109,0.00014558279,0.0002990112,0.0008643916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819,0.00057761924,0.00021829225,0.00010390049,0.0005547495,0.000355451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011329013,0.00015691202,0.0003027323,0.002362054,0.017382765,0.005512512,0.0007138984,0.00073325343,0.0060196603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043717036,0.00012470175,0.00012495922,0.0039644744,0.011330284,0.0020007838,0.0034694902,0.0016679903,0.00011723574],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011983355,0.000030571995,0.020843795,0.00020110069,0.000038580965,0.0019355534,0.5470378,0.00022443391,0.0015084042,0.36228096,0.0045453114,0.061233614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014206472,0.000034031844,0.118668094,0.0007640891,0.00006281594,0.00079789344,0.5550233,0.00031548523,0.001412225,0.025141899,0.2976792,0.00008676134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9414383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9728646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058561683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04361261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0467028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31643313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2526541440","doi":"","title":"Mulki Al-Sharmani, dir, Feminist Activism, Women’s Rights And Legal Reform, Londres, Zed Books, 2013","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019580699531691257,"score_gpt":0.2930893376940419,"score_spread":0.2735086381623506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2526541440","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022221522,0.58770466,0.0013761373,0.10653981,0.0032774918,0.00005606119,0.0003153531,0.00012250531,0.2983859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06705438,0.5008691,0.002319059,0.020746417,0.0028674118,0.00024900868,0.0002741453,0.00021008225,0.4054103],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870837,0.00048997597,0.00007632674,0.00014289621,0.00042904794,0.0001534091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897206,0.00062339124,0.0001022732,0.000051006144,0.00013674317,0.000114598464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018477311,0.00084313034,0.0004417039,0.0018420428,0.0056105764,0.006877365,0.0011014249,0.0038986448,0.028037794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024869612,0.0006587332,0.00031603803,0.0035665345,0.0060106395,0.008938948,0.0026566994,0.004723132,0.006448668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039864204,0.000046843263,0.00060827145,0.00080002844,0.0000102435115,0.00020598006,0.015890408,0.0001283025,0.00025452347,0.24161941,0.6203382,0.120058015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006682648,0.000008796523,0.0010993296,0.00077126554,0.0000042009565,0.00013378354,0.005817186,0.000042949665,0.00013351219,0.020803131,0.9711683,0.000010785149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0200408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06482274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028037794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004894724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009268377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09379572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527964352","doi":"10.71781/2516","title":"Critique féministe matérialiste du droit civil québécois : le travail « domestique » et les violences sexuées, les « impensés » du droit du logement","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.033239801098916825,"score_gpt":0.33885643912255575,"score_spread":0.3056166380236389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527964352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22154444,0.020462334,0.004761373,0.12521149,0.00079097593,0.00009271521,0.00048031512,0.000049227434,0.6266072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89455116,0.0063462057,0.0007169342,0.004431187,0.00014038959,0.000066899294,0.00010484545,0.000040866806,0.09360155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978796,0.0008310085,0.000028116729,0.00020084837,0.0005564414,0.00050398003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764353,0.0008858072,0.00021289979,0.00012128745,0.00077105506,0.0003654685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024836631,0.00063011487,0.00041047763,0.0021243163,0.02146731,0.008865022,0.0016399153,0.0027887735,0.01304627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032783926,0.00023781252,0.00029693046,0.0028117301,0.032303702,0.0037159035,0.003245169,0.0034151361,0.0006509508],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019984127,0.000024004521,0.003869939,0.00017711213,0.00001117445,0.0004633901,0.27049953,0.00030563702,0.0004089725,0.6868894,0.020032186,0.017298674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010116411,0.00001798696,0.015703978,0.0007882014,0.000018117129,0.00020002197,0.35228825,0.00037775745,0.0003286872,0.039895397,0.59031963,0.000051823965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9441846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96430445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06970913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06970913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06816536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5057775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528975407","doi":"","title":"The Role of Dignity in Canadian and South African Gender Equality Jurisprudence","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Jurisprudence; Jurisdiction; Disadvantage; Law; Sociology; Gender equality; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.055525963570154956,"score_gpt":0.33650898016338376,"score_spread":0.28098301659322883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528975407","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10398036,0.059468623,0.007223925,0.2185762,0.0019050302,0.00014691033,0.0001454259,0.000042987118,0.60851055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9496184,0.010844738,0.0030103694,0.015783247,0.00014844975,0.000056622477,0.000027883574,0.000033788714,0.020476505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832704,0.003598751,0.0006139154,0.0013894708,0.007012174,0.004115276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98594946,0.0071257153,0.00061700575,0.0004366445,0.0043989876,0.001472135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013888384,0.00055429834,0.0009192803,0.0053413003,0.03488421,0.01291998,0.002425146,0.006445613,0.003273001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028299358,0.000519897,0.0006538707,0.0040122992,0.058220226,0.0057735234,0.007994652,0.0088545205,0.0001752282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018877467,0.0000063014336,0.0009121063,0.00012960796,0.0000080297505,0.00036904548,0.037505593,0.00013282584,0.00023717049,0.9412066,0.0031223306,0.01635159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004402367,0.000051396975,0.011267695,0.0031853074,0.000095870935,0.000813318,0.086433664,0.00056450284,0.0013587967,0.263182,0.6327239,0.00027950422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.919198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9485205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.122753024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.122753024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12463644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89063966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529091141","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.33.3.377","title":"Dual Legal System, Basotho Culture and Marital Stability","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Proclamation; Champion; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.14663799853541848,"score_gpt":0.3779781005958598,"score_spread":0.2313401020604413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529091141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95357174,0.001229238,0.00010273425,0.0026943164,0.000053059724,0.000010108225,0.000039472852,0.0000033946903,0.04229593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979232,0.0003668221,0.00004231977,0.00014986887,0.000009052646,0.0000034785155,0.000009054615,0.0000018257249,0.0014944199],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995763,0.00013569157,0.00002178648,0.000038914644,0.0000908099,0.00013647764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940825,0.00009741438,0.00019403172,0.000015934278,0.00006995715,0.00021444401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004129347,0.00012263142,0.00015175827,0.0006772113,0.00507729,0.0029327394,0.00043451658,0.00029082334,0.0045691817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087081577,0.00010017571,0.000058108224,0.001195367,0.0043520965,0.0009957536,0.0017798591,0.000830051,0.00017672897],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029321425,0.00052585645,0.27107987,0.00030093637,0.000045361106,0.0059567997,0.47221118,0.00015246912,0.0030413724,0.138372,0.0071127685,0.100908205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004165262,0.000117447016,0.4746996,0.00036479507,0.000032573324,0.0021269454,0.447535,0.0005183098,0.00035539654,0.009698704,0.064455554,0.000054043892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0565533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11136131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0565533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002859914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016498655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112448275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529910913","doi":"","title":"Military courts in a democratic South Africa: in search of their judicial independence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Democracy; Judicial independence; Political science; Law; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.028136188697696112,"score_gpt":0.26580457000992463,"score_spread":0.23766838131222853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529910913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54498446,0.017541358,0.00079310674,0.042744137,0.0005539188,0.00035123972,0.0002520738,0.000025612226,0.3927541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9442324,0.0035167953,0.00060116634,0.007432208,0.000103375794,0.00009967593,0.0000460952,0.000009516111,0.04395874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782467,0.00036516224,0.00008979465,0.00015081967,0.0004164586,0.0011530819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998228,0.00077881385,0.00032110882,0.000083467436,0.00028387576,0.00030467947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001953995,0.00027626427,0.00017637982,0.0009864321,0.008603912,0.0035843926,0.0005952527,0.0029416922,0.006704127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051213745,0.000504429,0.00019042005,0.0013693658,0.0031504775,0.0022032838,0.0030023041,0.0060727973,0.00032136883],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024008036,0.00009140046,0.029994925,0.00052868,0.00005916653,0.0100735985,0.06818988,0.00044240087,0.0031547481,0.7666467,0.038790394,0.08178801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024127107,0.0001835524,0.16981588,0.0016019731,0.00014392062,0.0036176825,0.06874272,0.00057492475,0.0040052175,0.03987078,0.711089,0.00011313493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.065486535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25845194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065486535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061502717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011250018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13021076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W253311260","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1207","title":"Fighting for the Right to Housing in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wellesley Institute; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Appeal; Legislation; Political science; Context (archaeology); Law; Economic Justice; Common law; Fair Housing Act; Public administration","score_opus":0.04495896988797166,"score_gpt":0.35400155828177166,"score_spread":0.3090425883938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W253311260","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3301735,0.0065412093,0.0022018538,0.10797792,0.00076580595,0.00020847937,0.00025808465,0.000068038775,0.5518052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9090673,0.0025846553,0.0013741802,0.016358692,0.000069633956,0.00003361573,0.000056719542,0.000026236268,0.07042899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951432,0.00032650837,0.00007655741,0.00027959692,0.0013208679,0.0028534434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806887,0.00039754304,0.00008909116,0.0000604574,0.00070299016,0.0006809513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015584345,0.0002574842,0.0003128758,0.0010401143,0.03801676,0.007323971,0.0017136339,0.0051601003,0.0052957875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042985757,0.0004659795,0.00043255108,0.0012779793,0.0074290656,0.0013820246,0.003679666,0.0054200245,0.00022580805],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005897175,0.00007080647,0.014936597,0.00011972232,0.000041800406,0.005474509,0.028298452,0.0019734423,0.0015339837,0.8566621,0.06002536,0.030804308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000698455,0.000052126252,0.036795527,0.0005334787,0.00011364678,0.0014423926,0.06956295,0.003330838,0.0022440723,0.04631309,0.8392299,0.0003121169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9961488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09844242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09844242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21112522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71425307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549553488","doi":"10.4102/ids.v50i1.2167","title":"Godsdienspluraliteit en die liberale staat – die illusie van sekulêre neutraliteit","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"In die Skriflig/In Luce Verbi","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Secularism; Secular state; Jurisprudence; Law; Appeal; State (computer science); Democracy; Liberalism; Political science; Pluralism (philosophy); Religious pluralism; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.017794358112309637,"score_gpt":0.3095690067877702,"score_spread":0.2917746486754606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549553488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051891666,0.027685039,0.03380511,0.09600941,0.0025714224,0.000053412674,0.00016487288,0.00018949552,0.7876294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91362554,0.0045973714,0.0059731537,0.0054899137,0.0006841879,0.00005236147,0.000073207986,0.00014494505,0.06935931],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962064,0.0019417374,0.00013291131,0.0004917428,0.00089605903,0.0003311336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779534,0.0012126109,0.00021126425,0.00033130264,0.00026631478,0.00018323229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042626793,0.00039335262,0.00034485466,0.00070575054,0.003537419,0.008745227,0.0006428194,0.0031574892,0.0071028215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059188134,0.00022407855,0.0002996649,0.0005953239,0.025477385,0.0063569373,0.0042507406,0.005257624,0.0014406308],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009051378,0.0000044758026,0.000090768044,0.000016516458,0.00000198781,0.000033369575,0.0015971629,0.000056735305,0.00007154096,0.99207145,0.0016857437,0.0043611713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016979826,0.000020333495,0.0004982923,0.0001701704,0.000005841878,0.00016236333,0.0016159982,0.00031306382,0.0004982277,0.6668891,0.32978645,0.000023246506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005421747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060956986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008745227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004921455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004058807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03570777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550333647","doi":"10.14264/uql.2016.675","title":"Challenging the efficacy of no-drop prosecution policies in domestic violence cases: a comparative legal analysis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"The University of Queensland","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Political science; Obligation; Enforcement; Legislation; Criminal justice; Law; Plaintiff; Criminology; Poison control; Sociology; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.022311321160979884,"score_gpt":0.316811300763871,"score_spread":0.2944999796028911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550333647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8785601,0.006630935,0.0013163786,0.007052389,0.00009483512,0.00020546623,0.00015590998,0.000007296612,0.105976656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99687034,0.0013309043,0.00020957932,0.0004068411,0.00004991731,0.00008716891,0.00006601205,0.000005893271,0.0009733641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97649336,0.016303182,0.0007410689,0.0009326053,0.0032919047,0.0022379784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8444719,0.12941682,0.015269906,0.0021752848,0.0071032387,0.0015629189],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026787201,0.00027866257,0.0007165976,0.0066298954,0.0054875673,0.006713472,0.0030494104,0.0027454474,0.008310813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09992113,0.00039764616,0.0005903184,0.0057117264,0.012359645,0.008357123,0.00536086,0.0032684898,0.00050175167],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006881787,0.0020399406,0.119429566,0.0010832339,0.0002884541,0.0025566635,0.15096307,0.0010123572,0.00035852435,0.65197355,0.005965208,0.06364125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023011737,0.0016547362,0.34870842,0.003821226,0.00053088303,0.0020065606,0.53399044,0.0035098179,0.0009017759,0.052832287,0.05167908,0.00013467563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017806191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029484954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026787201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012774586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042153196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.141666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556045997","doi":"","title":"Is a Class Action a ‘Classy Act’ to Implement outside the Ambit of the Constitution?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eSpace (Curtin University)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0482789081837574,"score_gpt":0.3277495910763121,"score_spread":0.27947068289255467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2556045997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011957369,0.001258332,0.034864947,0.04827236,0.0015697037,0.0000672678,0.0000979102,0.00016948354,0.90174264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7981758,0.0009509245,0.012657043,0.017349238,0.0010529184,0.00029841508,0.00010446045,0.000305671,0.16910557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99328446,0.003113168,0.00020609258,0.0011750862,0.0009610853,0.00126008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964767,0.0013652717,0.0003757797,0.0010273069,0.00043986738,0.0003150926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006995052,0.00055940746,0.0004730192,0.00074816693,0.0058181803,0.00978754,0.0013361641,0.0051939515,0.022061026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008181399,0.00030619637,0.00090200227,0.00064038474,0.03407824,0.010357682,0.003935454,0.006520939,0.0039023831],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041858502,0.0000042747147,0.00006174565,0.00000679139,0.0000014582874,0.000008417995,0.00061027316,0.000022819766,0.00003349838,0.9961526,0.0016690673,0.0014248644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025006086,0.000025728707,0.00065063994,0.00010452324,0.0000122541105,0.000050991395,0.0017117412,0.00030957046,0.0005592659,0.700125,0.2963987,0.00002670458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009843497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008959632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022061026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047768904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004714094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07380146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556967335","doi":"","title":"What Could Possibly Go Wrong? Examining the Consequences of the City of Toronto Public Square By-laws on Diversity in Yonge-Dundas Square","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Square (algebra); Diversity (politics); Law; Political science; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.02596646077086317,"score_gpt":0.24030823119868747,"score_spread":0.2143417704278243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2556967335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866263,0.00031849046,0.00007894055,0.003237319,0.000038704544,0.000022191287,0.00039046558,0.000003965205,0.00928364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980045,0.00019124722,0.00004330602,0.00013614626,0.000008585471,0.000013159637,0.00011225145,0.000003108636,0.0014876612],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998114,0.0004298928,0.00007263158,0.00017744092,0.0005636056,0.0006424637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99353725,0.0010665518,0.0014728454,0.0002976894,0.0022484988,0.0013772589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014258125,0.00018326066,0.00029475696,0.0009394474,0.007100986,0.0041406853,0.0012004325,0.0007105281,0.0040324777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068624294,0.00024755907,0.00044232598,0.0025588912,0.0056243637,0.0015864922,0.003001298,0.0013518687,0.00018331537],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010168685,0.00007380787,0.74540293,0.00014895201,0.00008100382,0.0013685842,0.22854312,0.00057013606,0.00049211836,0.0065383725,0.00722081,0.009458607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033806477,0.0000361109,0.6962996,0.000092993185,0.000023356766,0.000055976827,0.29384917,0.00017823039,0.00013992866,0.00024936302,0.009053277,0.000018576442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9421209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98066497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05787909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041798797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01742102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30327296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561333220","doi":"10.1111/1467-9655.12542","title":"Rights and responsibilities in rural South Africa: implications for gender, generation, and personhood","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Wenner-Gren Foundation","keywords":"Personhood; Human rights; Subject (documents); Sociology; Value (mathematics); Meaning (existential); Neglect; Gender studies; Environmental ethics; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.09179248282789317,"score_gpt":0.3469678345541576,"score_spread":0.25517535172626443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561333220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9458042,0.0032184056,0.0010887077,0.009479809,0.000056338926,0.000046266476,0.000026514004,0.0000048012243,0.04027491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99724555,0.00077856577,0.00019336365,0.00017533559,0.000009761459,0.000020272946,0.000003794117,0.0000026547673,0.0015707638],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980831,0.0012257544,0.00004818154,0.00009024636,0.0001081567,0.00044453275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997823,0.0012151176,0.00043890305,0.000059279322,0.00011261143,0.00035102732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031516384,0.00040669716,0.0003283948,0.0012106708,0.008509545,0.0040162075,0.00080434873,0.0009679395,0.00476868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004550142,0.00028269793,0.0001634859,0.0015013452,0.020819087,0.0037061945,0.0069598528,0.0015055628,0.0001457401],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003260447,0.000036831403,0.009117194,0.00014220322,0.0000060416623,0.0014271262,0.91408724,0.00008760761,0.0011662893,0.06471055,0.0003049003,0.0088813305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007782732,0.000039592524,0.016063502,0.00021812822,0.0000060898205,0.00049066875,0.9508947,0.00008548201,0.00018241102,0.01501616,0.016982652,0.000012743653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021395504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03938999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021395504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042678476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034270429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04254192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564468797","doi":"10.1080/23323256.2016.1238772","title":"Is it enough to talk of marriage as a process? Legitimate co-habitation in Umlazi, South Africa","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Southern Africa","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Sociology; Ambiguity; Position (finance); Order (exchange); Space (punctuation); Gender studies; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04132436547426474,"score_gpt":0.380034638374425,"score_spread":0.3387102729001603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564468797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82037497,0.018543389,0.0018986854,0.08352718,0.0003147464,0.00005220899,0.000023838502,0.000011175556,0.07525389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99540687,0.002092976,0.00016046285,0.0008712511,0.000030108784,0.000012826618,0.0000025916204,0.0000027491005,0.0014201803],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977112,0.0015217375,0.00006706048,0.00012341217,0.00015154658,0.00042502655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857736,0.00078017084,0.00029320747,0.00005485006,0.00006979494,0.00022463144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025348475,0.00022254682,0.00028209214,0.0008305482,0.014602642,0.0043161917,0.00055143674,0.0016900847,0.0034771531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040751393,0.00025565323,0.00012738851,0.0013594726,0.02426714,0.0044997763,0.004487829,0.0023023041,0.0001793661],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021478369,0.000025116218,0.0048871213,0.00015287378,0.0000050885765,0.0019101026,0.76368093,0.00004616743,0.00074261636,0.21814255,0.0012337202,0.0091522345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000130827475,0.000048146718,0.012427539,0.0005550558,0.000010465709,0.001153405,0.8647736,0.00014351928,0.0003741922,0.031269178,0.08920608,0.000025780299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03924087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05696888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03924087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060247523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047967467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078024924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W256952874","doi":"10.4324/9781315243450-41","title":"Sentencing the corporate offender: Legal and social issues","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Sentencing guidelines; Political science; Transparency (behavior); Context (archaeology); Law; Punishment (psychology); Legislation; Criminology; Imprisonment; Politics; Penology; Sociology; Sentence; Prison; History; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.037950854719609135,"score_gpt":0.21725911686657964,"score_spread":0.17930826214697052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W256952874","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039887577,0.13214777,0.00025487677,0.7479528,0.0067324187,0.00003101353,0.00007041317,0.000025424206,0.108796544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34468344,0.2010987,0.00068726484,0.26058543,0.034888566,0.0002826127,0.0001777056,0.00008169115,0.15751456],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954853,0.002463646,0.00019549478,0.00030831294,0.0008586305,0.00068868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99297214,0.0045495704,0.0004540784,0.00014264487,0.0011313668,0.00075012346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037948107,0.00046668766,0.0005224678,0.0016427329,0.010336007,0.009736168,0.0016675085,0.014458182,0.018341258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011185823,0.0003811854,0.00033337824,0.002058683,0.011957649,0.006862972,0.0037645856,0.0066725966,0.0017979771],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015613297,0.0000714759,0.0009175329,0.0004713448,0.000007655023,0.00060191326,0.01471985,0.00017214204,0.000102505546,0.33769625,0.5874869,0.057736743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049816344,0.000042731546,0.003997431,0.0021941008,0.000008710932,0.00061841105,0.031202605,0.00010645477,0.000067803456,0.042698402,0.9190324,0.000025913792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037282098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0395381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037282098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00873518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008671439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07413018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572354882","doi":"10.4102/apsdpr.v4i2.114","title":"Alternative Service Delivery in Africa: The Case for International Regional Organisations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Africa’s Public Service Delivery and Performance Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Service delivery framework; Corporate governance; State (computer science); Regional science; Population; Political science; Work (physics); Service (business); Harmonization; Regional integration; Economic growth; Public administration; Geography; Business; Sociology; International trade; Economics; Marketing; Engineering","score_opus":0.0878023863314305,"score_gpt":0.31164680710534076,"score_spread":0.22384442077391026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2572354882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10025457,0.01864848,0.016753437,0.20106462,0.00044489923,0.00028270832,0.00005157349,0.00004472138,0.662455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9669688,0.005424872,0.003027448,0.0063108327,0.00026868898,0.00016416563,0.000012615286,0.000027844126,0.017794717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9603534,0.025578395,0.0008893741,0.0014472627,0.0034506046,0.008280951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9741158,0.016750282,0.0030055377,0.0013977535,0.0025652512,0.0021653115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031179743,0.0005670248,0.0005114904,0.002835385,0.013081542,0.018402385,0.0021011543,0.00921835,0.0063293595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041079756,0.00050434534,0.00080958736,0.003218359,0.023414928,0.014180636,0.010756538,0.008285468,0.000644895],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070314286,0.000011309273,0.00046065106,0.000069298374,0.000003220199,0.00043458573,0.009575204,0.00026502126,0.000032767064,0.98099434,0.0016990462,0.006447635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007575674,0.0001288925,0.0032999986,0.0027651384,0.000047925347,0.0020353086,0.09610715,0.0021880972,0.00038989107,0.2834286,0.6094522,0.000081028535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02167446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019411728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031179743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017789528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018515516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16489619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2585827466","doi":"","title":"Migration Governance and Migration Rights in the Southern African Development Community (SADC): Attempts at Harmonization in a Disharmonious Region","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Department for International Development; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Political science; Harmonization; International trade; Corporate governance; Development economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.03685802613868033,"score_gpt":0.24971520603611647,"score_spread":0.21285717989743613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2585827466","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.734269,0.0065061245,0.0028106617,0.12493487,0.0002521208,0.0000822761,0.00003442358,0.00001763059,0.13109297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99499196,0.000791523,0.00032928347,0.001238719,0.000036671696,0.000019771765,0.000005470091,0.0000038127855,0.0025828497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99656385,0.0020717657,0.00008755019,0.00019861873,0.00022809784,0.00085010985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977976,0.00087686884,0.00049966533,0.00015937748,0.00019702145,0.00046946778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065016383,0.0001491738,0.00017366267,0.00085884245,0.009106504,0.0062183538,0.0005607503,0.0018039811,0.00220033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070738057,0.00013911113,0.00012637537,0.0013158695,0.020766702,0.004082248,0.008378611,0.0022668561,0.000105306586],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002565862,0.000032300453,0.009376852,0.00009781344,0.00000784901,0.00059068826,0.13484083,0.00036539722,0.0006395256,0.82252747,0.0034988343,0.027996868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006264374,0.0001529572,0.046419837,0.0011485304,0.000023969536,0.00053920323,0.32762384,0.00082555076,0.00079330796,0.21468835,0.40767187,0.00004985191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016246803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0266623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016246803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054800725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010502666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039760828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586306443","doi":"10.3130/aija.69.77_2","title":"CONSIDERATIONS ON FORMATION, DESTRUCTION AND REDEVELOPMENT OF DISTRICT SIX (CAPE TOWN, SOUTH AFRICA)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redevelopment; Zoning; Quarter (Canadian coin); Cape; Slum; Colonialism; Geography; Plan (archaeology); Malay; Economic shortage; Space (punctuation); Environmental planning; Archaeology; Political science; Sociology; Law; Demography; Computer science","score_opus":0.022961142873072216,"score_gpt":0.27276466615906086,"score_spread":0.24980352328598865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586306443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5130876,0.009416903,0.0042756842,0.038753543,0.00038643082,0.00023402543,0.00016243012,0.000034569977,0.4336488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96611786,0.001715407,0.0011915106,0.0004223613,0.00003822569,0.000034942877,0.000022067954,0.00000864731,0.030449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878865,0.00036515438,0.00005869464,0.000098583034,0.00018980444,0.0004990826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991697,0.00029459427,0.00014137822,0.000048265927,0.00014074138,0.0002052479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014024529,0.00018397217,0.00010169333,0.0015566146,0.008026761,0.004100147,0.0010637864,0.0011998102,0.005263418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037888936,0.00029667807,0.00015577352,0.0012719684,0.00862437,0.0025293664,0.0025509817,0.0018038721,0.00022280925],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005146318,0.000031088508,0.009908778,0.00021965631,0.0000061460946,0.007021208,0.15013821,0.00096520566,0.002250817,0.7609626,0.010994728,0.05744997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013561726,0.00007936907,0.052564193,0.00068545225,0.000010214167,0.0025159377,0.15116465,0.0003166728,0.0021731844,0.02284686,0.767567,0.00006292672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10639414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2523242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10639414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007843433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064689913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2115497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592597033","doi":"","title":"Responsible Government in Nova Scotia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œWashington historical quarterly","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); History; Government (linguistics); Genealogy; Geography; Archaeology; Philosophy; Engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.016714909257411193,"score_gpt":0.2785677344851311,"score_spread":0.2618528252277199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592597033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074442424,0.03064491,0.00061707955,0.17911379,0.00679699,0.0000942392,0.0009974629,0.00010230563,0.70719093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40589094,0.010066649,0.00064253027,0.027799908,0.00047138214,0.000053174543,0.00037053143,0.00004256662,0.5546623],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998459,0.00017005102,0.000066825654,0.00008645112,0.00042259527,0.00079521484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980038,0.00027852252,0.00017303688,0.000094486284,0.00064411905,0.00080611685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076082896,0.00016796011,0.00017507756,0.00069121504,0.006847068,0.0048736664,0.000523066,0.0019976385,0.0063831955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033279096,0.00025700865,0.00021367414,0.0009513688,0.0017876915,0.00074638665,0.0016452953,0.00276168,0.00085146783],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009849667,0.0000446026,0.013668787,0.00022399756,0.000026438114,0.0053301416,0.0075050825,0.0006948431,0.00078694196,0.30543587,0.6177359,0.048448797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018062432,0.00001678877,0.056412805,0.00031550642,0.000007879131,0.00035187823,0.0027173841,0.00026458895,0.00017034699,0.0054197405,0.9342725,0.000032455842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91077566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9639822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08922434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024886526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055762127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18056524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602041320","doi":"","title":"The validity of historical aboriginal treaty rights : the Canadian experience : aantekeninge","year":2006,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Tydskrif vir die suid-afrikaanse reg","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Indigenous; Political science; Law; Indigenous rights; Land rights; Human rights; History; Ethnology","score_opus":0.026954262350276273,"score_gpt":0.3107086171061892,"score_spread":0.28375435475591293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602041320","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14801304,0.041911308,0.0008132163,0.17686257,0.0015044272,0.00007607459,0.0002884858,0.00004626729,0.63048464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8118535,0.02492585,0.0010811063,0.015300872,0.00023536493,0.000051296396,0.000096027965,0.00012312879,0.1463329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917842,0.0014521482,0.00015994825,0.0005515355,0.0032057236,0.0028464356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99206454,0.0032532339,0.00032342447,0.00025392973,0.0029020293,0.0012027643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007854826,0.00042261425,0.0006178878,0.0021799766,0.07227957,0.015461107,0.002187758,0.0051817647,0.0101945605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013826182,0.00049082487,0.0004505232,0.0049296794,0.031018712,0.00548885,0.0042501893,0.008825867,0.00056485535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006398085,0.00005666086,0.0033115188,0.00019265732,0.000022589995,0.0012402828,0.350594,0.00028137586,0.00031762608,0.53443533,0.074728005,0.034755953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013179186,0.000015383657,0.0066225235,0.00046642733,0.00002470141,0.00033174746,0.18001467,0.00013518259,0.00021085332,0.011641217,0.80042356,0.00010048869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9950901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15592833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15592833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19819239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9790035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606452615","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.39.4.453","title":"A Critical Evaluation of Attitudes towards Nuclear, Joint and Extended Family Structures among People of Indian Origin in Durban, South Africa","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Westernization; Reflexivity; Sociology; Situated; Extended family; Nuclear family; Perspective (graphical); Gender studies; Social science; Geography; Political science; Anthropology; Law","score_opus":0.21977888678953023,"score_gpt":0.4281287374795857,"score_spread":0.20834985069005546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606452615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948114,0.0005251556,0.000095073585,0.0011756037,0.00004484359,0.00006379847,0.000031308286,0.0000019599374,0.003250766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979169,0.000684323,0.00010656363,0.00029217725,0.000025121126,0.00006464065,0.000016264896,0.0000023618286,0.0008916399],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957955,0.0026313125,0.00021767413,0.00018116846,0.0005918497,0.00058242166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836805,0.010171683,0.002645692,0.00045611104,0.002191311,0.00085462694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008950533,0.00045788058,0.00040787237,0.0030439415,0.008107051,0.0049214712,0.0010800266,0.0008798929,0.0020632118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020674465,0.0003638165,0.00022952969,0.002489635,0.0085566,0.0027454174,0.003496374,0.0022736443,0.00015488782],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022074833,0.000016370179,0.009896807,0.000118409116,0.000003738809,0.00049372314,0.9840148,0.0000073213364,0.0004638969,0.0006534313,0.0002600757,0.004049333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.796544e-7,0.000020620944,0.008333058,0.00005513643,0.0000022305944,0.00006395333,0.9894705,0.0000049188466,0.00008914821,0.00006261573,0.0018929638,0.0000040284754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04764655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08018847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04764655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067733205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050845747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094738424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606686253","doi":"","title":"The constitutional phenomenon of parliamentary privilege and immunity in South Africa : a comparison with jurisdictions in Britain, Canada and France","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Law; Privilege (computing); Political science; Legislation; Doctrine; Politics","score_opus":0.02747202688656342,"score_gpt":0.2822475937560583,"score_spread":0.2547755668694949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606686253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70213914,0.006426032,0.00070807367,0.00644201,0.000063582935,0.000041039504,0.000079446305,0.000013849519,0.28408673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99568605,0.000742852,0.00009678491,0.00033756037,0.000013134326,0.000012759834,0.000010284514,0.000007813421,0.0030927358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955526,0.0010133912,0.000115065704,0.00031754634,0.000679435,0.0023218377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99647444,0.0018106105,0.0006380571,0.00017771834,0.0004978738,0.00040138423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018983858,0.00020493186,0.00042404523,0.0038232703,0.011514871,0.007855919,0.00073986687,0.0015049872,0.003218734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007098075,0.00027970198,0.00034949725,0.0054574884,0.018524548,0.0026122686,0.0046026087,0.0027346315,0.00016459786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077406585,0.00002150315,0.01351415,0.00016465958,0.000031144602,0.0015386866,0.15812749,0.00017757501,0.0013809234,0.8093241,0.0013035843,0.014338744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007595242,0.00010023751,0.31708172,0.0013731851,0.00019281286,0.0020138915,0.24907553,0.00052646064,0.0021674088,0.040714663,0.38650942,0.00016861246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5461369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56989306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45386308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023512064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017178077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91307193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610411114","doi":"","title":"The various policy options for the settlement of disputes in residential community schemes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review = Stellenbosch Regstydskrif","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Arbitration; Dispute resolution; Law; Political science; Settlement (finance); Alternative dispute resolution; Public administration; Mediation; Leasehold estate; Business","score_opus":0.03562624560871863,"score_gpt":0.3707180090891675,"score_spread":0.3350917634804489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610411114","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031837802,0.03012115,0.08242893,0.1432814,0.0015548854,0.00065476797,0.00007289071,0.00010433398,0.70994395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7555263,0.027385402,0.052350845,0.011412289,0.0019488155,0.0017531003,0.0000987728,0.00012297867,0.14940138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9500611,0.036099784,0.0016396953,0.0013278247,0.0073393392,0.0035322735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902851,0.0067573637,0.00072277815,0.00078307395,0.00095670036,0.00049500505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023175336,0.0005439672,0.000539403,0.002610093,0.010598213,0.020733444,0.0030421952,0.0095049795,0.008428864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022790518,0.000650108,0.00091732567,0.0032911645,0.025453566,0.012173289,0.008521953,0.0061390023,0.0010817776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037472341,0.000008986815,0.000055767025,0.000025262165,0.0000011117558,0.00003262194,0.0016052076,0.00022566895,0.000024513998,0.98880506,0.002704547,0.0065075886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027406535,0.000033854692,0.00040882692,0.00055114634,0.000008827634,0.00023271152,0.010928566,0.0013533246,0.00021570832,0.6929859,0.29320726,0.000046428417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049687284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054630246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023175336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010715594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009326727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.122564375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611578056","doi":"","title":"Regional Migration Governance in the African Continent. Current State of Affairs and the Way Forward","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Political science; Regionalism (politics); European union; Government (linguistics); German; Regional science; State (computer science); Geography; Development economics; Economic growth; International trade; Business; Economics; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.009561877314595017,"score_gpt":0.2667672865665327,"score_spread":0.2572054092519377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611578056","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45351887,0.12653044,0.005414627,0.19042198,0.0005838951,0.00010835302,0.00023573781,0.00008976255,0.2230964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773422,0.0138073005,0.0014607718,0.0018790019,0.00007873321,0.000026522239,0.000031673353,0.0000076150427,0.005366162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988857,0.00049221853,0.00005876683,0.00009860418,0.000095777745,0.00036899262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989778,0.00029536666,0.0003168867,0.00007442996,0.00013683265,0.00019873826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002979195,0.00015362141,0.00014160282,0.00073074596,0.0025541224,0.003709425,0.00056599115,0.0010847775,0.003390779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033988748,0.0001319136,0.00012083812,0.0017302643,0.0047208304,0.002428214,0.0022187268,0.00096918806,0.00019926841],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042310337,0.000028642531,0.016222911,0.0010160806,0.000026589556,0.001359355,0.065112345,0.0015751239,0.0010354978,0.75204545,0.012546879,0.14898883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014714202,0.00008083571,0.05856951,0.0020315906,0.000025232459,0.0010537461,0.08762642,0.00089841185,0.00058872893,0.060051437,0.78902644,0.000032956348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021039743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029518759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021039743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035541772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061804154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041834593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613736125","doi":"","title":"Transforming court governance in Victoria","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Monash University","keywords":"Political science; Corporate governance; Law; Mandate; Court of record; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Administration (probate law); Statutory law; Public administration; Original jurisdiction; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Business","score_opus":0.028414062702570957,"score_gpt":0.31926572362056227,"score_spread":0.2908516609179913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613736125","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31303,0.004404855,0.009175359,0.039489686,0.00029482163,0.00019954624,0.00006883623,0.000044752323,0.6332922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96553004,0.00084385363,0.0011184006,0.0012752594,0.00002736594,0.000032033957,0.000019522615,0.000016696476,0.031136846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992912,0.0030873767,0.00016543898,0.000759588,0.0013629271,0.0017125843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957136,0.0013081735,0.000507846,0.00030431163,0.00077911804,0.0013870272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00440023,0.00016163947,0.00022804309,0.0010852986,0.010688256,0.013077603,0.0011456868,0.002396707,0.005125985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009999767,0.000492119,0.00026186655,0.00167613,0.01376929,0.0046484643,0.008665026,0.0042670774,0.00038056253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065236427,0.000019657975,0.0014140185,0.000035903315,0.000004247688,0.00018988541,0.026686424,0.00047605074,0.00017316459,0.9541132,0.0030143324,0.01386661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021143407,0.000060981143,0.015414048,0.0007947872,0.00001701393,0.00031358044,0.060710337,0.0033865946,0.00042286492,0.3141075,0.60467947,0.00007167028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21281579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3483431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21281579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04127325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04023073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42315412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614273743","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2851153","title":"The Civil Domestic Violence Legislation Drafting Table: Where is Ontario?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Table (database); Law; Political science; Engineering; Forensic engineering; Computer science; Database","score_opus":0.015518685902076536,"score_gpt":0.2928823387591639,"score_spread":0.27736365285708736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614273743","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010328155,0.008436242,0.0018401605,0.78388244,0.011593468,0.00040986098,0.005217093,0.0004421514,0.17785047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24925691,0.023654338,0.016565697,0.24063455,0.0056893057,0.0008396982,0.0070273853,0.0016431182,0.454689],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882013,0.0014526343,0.0015549063,0.0008033279,0.0049401885,0.003047663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9514093,0.00999862,0.0036742864,0.0015679915,0.022521937,0.010827828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013065601,0.0003319438,0.00091619365,0.0046914336,0.014281947,0.020158509,0.0028063182,0.010873693,0.044819374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05752958,0.0010764167,0.0006484783,0.0068566925,0.0043242057,0.01261021,0.0035260296,0.00875678,0.007277931],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061254774,0.000052826625,0.0049012373,0.0006029625,0.00001372433,0.0005968208,0.0042887437,0.00015509989,0.00035505238,0.10143208,0.80587727,0.08166293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014780294,0.000013374574,0.008490864,0.0011587143,0.000018285984,0.00008186297,0.0053859563,0.00009768055,0.0002720199,0.0046609724,0.97972494,0.000080414145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5531227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64505845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4468773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02654365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17762455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8990181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2617174980","doi":"","title":"Die glansende skadu van haar afwesigheid : die logika van supplementariteit in André P. Brink se Donkermaan","year":2002,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Stilet : Tydskrif van die Afrikaanse Letterkundevereniging","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Depiction; Pessimism; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Art; Theology; Psychology; Literature","score_opus":0.04257808848954566,"score_gpt":0.29135973236932583,"score_spread":0.24878164387978016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2617174980","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03061088,0.22300835,0.0036261831,0.14874522,0.007075203,0.000056990113,0.00033953506,0.0001679835,0.58636963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46426913,0.09020056,0.0031901016,0.011095604,0.0028878797,0.00014516138,0.00027340447,0.00058380264,0.42735434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986424,0.00077174057,0.000039768955,0.00011911866,0.00031678454,0.00011017084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993856,0.00033848503,0.00006203148,0.000037110058,0.000098311284,0.00007848666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016122697,0.0005755498,0.00039663096,0.00088435016,0.0052005015,0.0060605546,0.00071684556,0.0021849119,0.015571882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031288704,0.0003417121,0.00013970253,0.0012289971,0.005652536,0.004407834,0.0034472358,0.0035589868,0.0038134959],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086010514,0.00007146344,0.0005146113,0.00031491823,0.000009681611,0.0007516731,0.08550078,0.00017967071,0.0006447751,0.4957144,0.33975342,0.07645863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017663268,0.0000037756245,0.00014280912,0.00018408333,0.0000010236189,0.00013196807,0.004535741,0.000027307113,0.00010317063,0.005230842,0.98963284,0.0000045893576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013651782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019934963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015571882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041253045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023901898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05209315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618913004","doi":"10.1080/00358533.2017.1326674","title":"An ‘All of Commonwealth’ Journey: From Marlborough House to Malakal","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Round Table","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.08129354360226068,"score_gpt":0.39928069530067356,"score_spread":0.31798715169841285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618913004","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.314853,0.014884879,0.0014398238,0.40327194,0.0029105647,0.00009034416,0.000057550642,0.000051234412,0.26244074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.809605,0.0050107543,0.0007789484,0.034284916,0.0002996488,0.000054383956,0.000023010602,0.000055588054,0.14988774],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847406,0.00054881803,0.000025953763,0.00008534399,0.00014861405,0.00071715505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885035,0.00028480656,0.00008570246,0.00004588665,0.00009755704,0.0006357127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014666651,0.00026350448,0.00017816407,0.0004948093,0.038804166,0.007195419,0.0008472137,0.0028640917,0.018735284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023609216,0.00029828618,0.0001478661,0.0007227906,0.013879049,0.005394959,0.009357145,0.0055682007,0.0009889285],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000444548,0.00008051459,0.0033882072,0.00013403296,0.000008206529,0.0058099274,0.5790109,0.00006241035,0.0012687995,0.30140775,0.07335137,0.0354334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043528307,0.000024841413,0.0032263016,0.00016083986,0.000002729809,0.00073180255,0.25499132,0.000020713758,0.00029638933,0.005032318,0.735486,0.000022406592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13193798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3715687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13193798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010384197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012464424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619093147","doi":"","title":"Part Three Child and Family Services Act Table of Concordance with Bill C-89","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Concordance; Table (database); Medicine; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.02117728817160394,"score_gpt":0.24929470781495267,"score_spread":0.22811741964334872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2619093147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036568963,0.0016471249,0.0012121174,0.014102856,0.004008515,0.0024337796,0.0743757,0.0008847024,0.8976782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01675007,0.0027706004,0.0026663097,0.021843817,0.0011253891,0.0038755548,0.06404697,0.0007051393,0.8862161],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99070156,0.0007276699,0.00083403784,0.0006528579,0.0052661537,0.0018178073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98677105,0.0019972317,0.00069092296,0.00073621207,0.008492312,0.0013121772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037870384,0.0008051689,0.0008693073,0.0024212997,0.0042088456,0.0040440923,0.002036484,0.0057309098,0.14415516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018239884,0.0011263614,0.0010071525,0.0031297647,0.00074926007,0.0016024787,0.0015502416,0.0049904976,0.08683947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022997005,0.000038681173,0.00052832667,0.00007249636,0.0000025727177,0.000054374475,0.00012725667,0.00006044268,0.00013152782,0.010780839,0.98152155,0.0066589494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039941715,0.000029502591,0.011704869,0.00040706902,0.00000832809,0.000070412185,0.00029231724,0.00010950477,0.00014578618,0.001371395,0.98578054,0.000040310148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3323975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42920223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66760254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010801694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0360924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66092545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620782846","doi":"","title":"Charter Litigation, Social and Economic Rights & Civil Procedure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Civil rights; Political science; Social rights; Law and economics; Law; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.02745461013366895,"score_gpt":0.3526265116974939,"score_spread":0.32517190156382497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620782846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13553812,0.033066116,0.0017552738,0.20423697,0.00058358855,0.000107226275,0.00016176564,0.000021005691,0.62452996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95565295,0.007033383,0.0003966497,0.0066644093,0.00046282055,0.000085929256,0.00002093289,0.000011928656,0.029670967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99639773,0.0016253942,0.00013793955,0.00021341935,0.0004256665,0.0011998331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907658,0.0074952706,0.0008217626,0.00020936118,0.00036052105,0.00034730506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046304455,0.00041278082,0.00043988027,0.001972973,0.014105223,0.015580598,0.0010188586,0.013585511,0.015797442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014445828,0.0004674893,0.00030490066,0.003742628,0.028388554,0.007858971,0.0040684314,0.008327316,0.0004846929],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000090058375,0.000018320889,0.00035137552,0.0000389268,0.0000024239575,0.00026461968,0.00483281,0.00008143981,0.000053326512,0.9888382,0.003172033,0.0023374988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064505286,0.00006140473,0.008335111,0.0011806418,0.000046397297,0.0007692759,0.044023953,0.0005666921,0.0005702292,0.7710884,0.1732296,0.00006371767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044520445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.065081894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044520445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011215239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017776368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08852261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622699047","doi":"","title":"Redressing Harm: A proposal for the establishment of a stolen generations reparations tribunal","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indigenous law bulletin","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Indigenous; Harm; Political science; Law; Government (linguistics); Legislature; Publishing; Project commissioning","score_opus":0.025215637460859645,"score_gpt":0.32331715834525193,"score_spread":0.2981015208843923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622699047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021831699,0.0029497165,0.008800631,0.32811886,0.016346646,0.0045863404,0.0014096111,0.0015974875,0.61435914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040607434,0.0009951481,0.0056218635,0.080180086,0.002373845,0.0017333897,0.00068006286,0.00026170132,0.8675464],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880122,0.00246459,0.0010768188,0.0009882909,0.00406267,0.0033953395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853939,0.0037422914,0.00085493166,0.0018272237,0.0039678984,0.004213683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012255311,0.0006228621,0.0006675355,0.0015194439,0.013928827,0.011071059,0.004765137,0.032358825,0.049424596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026441287,0.0013747495,0.00128899,0.00085997133,0.0037695586,0.007214848,0.009640583,0.0168853,0.023746211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079737554,0.00031522367,0.0013936256,0.00013675504,0.000013106847,0.0015834502,0.0033806858,0.0002248163,0.001031677,0.058657065,0.9108288,0.022354977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007614117,0.00015074298,0.0029498427,0.000105405714,0.000013431848,0.00024961468,0.0024722083,0.00015469379,0.0004098366,0.0025003208,0.9908433,0.00007451815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038874738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08009145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049424596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043076016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027302919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16534173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2631610529","doi":"","title":"Curbing Reckless and Predatory Lending: A Statutory Analysis of South Africa's National Credit Act","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Online (University of Wollongong)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Legislation; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12580478208903392,"score_gpt":0.3869839508270283,"score_spread":0.2611791687379944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2631610529","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37810522,0.008856485,0.018888073,0.07762267,0.0003160328,0.00054193597,0.00029542428,0.00006318491,0.515311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752666,0.0021697786,0.0037819296,0.0039956337,0.000083167935,0.00021221075,0.00003198097,0.000016307042,0.014442481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99464285,0.0016931136,0.000384789,0.0003109775,0.0019307237,0.001037637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991198,0.0054697734,0.0015054657,0.00045316163,0.0011311573,0.00024238616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065092235,0.00030338124,0.00034345468,0.0027230992,0.0044367807,0.005381785,0.0011172327,0.0037657516,0.0028406412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017538695,0.00035733375,0.00042143586,0.002210366,0.012292146,0.00360217,0.0029445677,0.0042330185,0.00022450135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015217396,0.000018670937,0.0028485204,0.0000800837,0.0000054205666,0.00042484945,0.011761898,0.00045142343,0.0003342752,0.97487766,0.0020839733,0.0070978045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058712947,0.00013876105,0.051757798,0.003384678,0.00015734111,0.0017851553,0.03967337,0.0068022073,0.0040459274,0.49028265,0.40172693,0.00018648554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05303449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.064710595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05303449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011092406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02079024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.105451584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2701135309","doi":"10.1177/0964663917710986","title":"Articulations of Aboriginal Title, Indigenous Rights, and Living Customary Law in South Africa","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Colonialism; Indigenous rights; Political science; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Scholarship; Human rights","score_opus":0.039013163952688695,"score_gpt":0.3743865769613492,"score_spread":0.3353734130086605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2701135309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72841907,0.014046047,0.0019829988,0.029042332,0.00012834553,0.000053736214,0.000019186533,0.000012568719,0.22629572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99563944,0.001485381,0.0001628942,0.00032108166,0.000020149086,0.000016350203,0.0000025234358,0.0000040900304,0.0023479804],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966988,0.0019231978,0.00015317621,0.00021106911,0.00040106897,0.0006126347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949443,0.0035108963,0.0007677422,0.00023296486,0.00021244449,0.00033167083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055631334,0.00024293413,0.00032172227,0.0029424042,0.016335117,0.007998063,0.00080548506,0.0019376057,0.0026221492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008913372,0.0002892852,0.00015661695,0.0034118546,0.059743058,0.007040096,0.010423093,0.0033255685,0.000095606636],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075523853,0.000010714641,0.0018104356,0.000063019455,0.0000028066577,0.00055526744,0.55560416,0.00005328069,0.00020724653,0.43581495,0.0003120453,0.005558505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012296773,0.000036546364,0.017595643,0.0009833127,0.000018429178,0.00072920625,0.7942656,0.0001832187,0.0005018974,0.10859007,0.077050425,0.000033315093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047484342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06458482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047484342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011717308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008408885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0944159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W27264515","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1021","title":"Aboriginal and Treaty Rights and Violence against Women","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Victoria; U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Indigenous; Treaty; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Section (typography); Criminology; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.006509524513361927,"score_gpt":0.27224665411809296,"score_spread":0.265737129604731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W27264515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16076621,0.012679785,0.0012738908,0.09319226,0.00061697525,0.000051208855,0.000051895273,0.00001948316,0.7313482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92802495,0.003842099,0.0006248595,0.008638679,0.00024420623,0.00003980999,0.000013954152,0.000010365108,0.05856117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968489,0.001397178,0.00007813804,0.00016182827,0.00047711536,0.0010368271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986663,0.0006551465,0.0002049163,0.000076697695,0.00015686669,0.0002400382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030830575,0.00017021046,0.00021064734,0.0006468959,0.0120606525,0.003839298,0.0005912658,0.003246917,0.005162135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042758426,0.00017944686,0.00023166389,0.0006732556,0.020666922,0.0017124376,0.0037149729,0.0028344172,0.00023513872],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009806657,0.000011591533,0.0014936748,0.0000462159,0.0000055138303,0.0005382308,0.07187523,0.00007198901,0.00027058087,0.9148438,0.0054602935,0.005373213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020865366,0.000077252495,0.016922096,0.0009705856,0.00004185594,0.0008503656,0.113177106,0.00021373389,0.00062651554,0.21922778,0.64781725,0.000054606066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15901308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20628636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8409869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058169807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012073425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31617504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2731186053","doi":"","title":"The litigant in person and the access to justice dilemma : quo vadis South Africa","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Status quo; Dilemma; Political science; Law; Adversary; Economic Justice; Common law; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Law and economics; Computer security","score_opus":0.09857682815585109,"score_gpt":0.35440460100717075,"score_spread":0.25582777285131963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2731186053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40446103,0.026126629,0.0034710583,0.23922485,0.00086610194,0.00009708048,0.00003700755,0.000012407568,0.32570386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768957,0.004857465,0.00045145542,0.0065151867,0.00015736048,0.00003232717,0.0000045653946,0.000006045426,0.011079901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760866,0.0012146238,0.00009874935,0.00017731084,0.00028061084,0.0006200329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998052,0.0010742057,0.0002807792,0.000082596176,0.00011861046,0.00039182554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032883848,0.00026481718,0.00033848648,0.0009403994,0.011680717,0.008208082,0.00061291433,0.0043846467,0.0053103413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057002916,0.00019937826,0.0002625791,0.0010783471,0.018686047,0.0071619106,0.0075112386,0.004371452,0.00025588684],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020048315,0.000035013167,0.0022673802,0.00014643445,0.000009960857,0.0029724743,0.12993467,0.000101282654,0.00045510198,0.85144395,0.002837291,0.009776404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033814304,0.00008593364,0.006399261,0.0011584613,0.000030098707,0.003942737,0.2989058,0.00040878236,0.0004752104,0.3898504,0.2986594,0.00005010783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007241075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011293131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011680717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032125681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062035727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023308933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737102794","doi":"","title":"Exploring the core content of socio-economic rights : South African and International perspectives, D Brand and S Russell (Eds.) : review note","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SA Publiekreg = SA Public Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Covenant; Cultural rights; Political science; Constitution; International human rights law; Context (archaeology); Social rights; Fundamental rights; Law; Economic growth; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.12042639562286035,"score_gpt":0.30720428929256777,"score_spread":0.18677789366970743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737102794","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000095034615,0.9924832,0.000036286576,0.005653806,0.00038382428,0.0000016109694,0.0000044586473,9.4034436e-7,0.0013407277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001555874,0.99652475,0.0000515518,0.00071396667,0.00050593476,0.0000071632376,0.000008181734,0.0000018122142,0.0006307901],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990227,0.00043683057,0.000079044716,0.00008862759,0.0002842495,0.00008845752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996801,0.0024778899,0.00024237823,0.000045942805,0.00030992014,0.00012284712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029457356,0.00091409,0.0012685637,0.005439559,0.0017639993,0.0063260947,0.0010010541,0.002967536,0.005359017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004684872,0.0006279357,0.00055361935,0.012834764,0.006358296,0.009263719,0.0021591955,0.003102011,0.0012449939],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008292427,0.000059896953,0.0010634105,0.022723356,0.00010052687,0.0003584133,0.0110788895,0.00028427498,0.0004584611,0.111087985,0.24094501,0.61175686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000085382235,0.000026083571,0.0033979332,0.023189668,0.000044870754,0.0005756153,0.0055201394,0.000040895433,0.000118951626,0.02064789,0.9464146,0.000014797142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005763697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0102382125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063260947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027062332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057920963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01963514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737267453","doi":"10.5287/ora-py6rqzzoz","title":"Realising intersectionality in discrimination law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intersectionality; Doctrine; Scrutiny; Normative; Mainstream; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; Identity (music); Law and economics; Judicial interpretation; Political science; Law; Gender studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.05487928442682189,"score_gpt":0.34412506503773455,"score_spread":0.28924578061091266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737267453","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.097294055,0.005440695,0.1449389,0.047490593,0.0006401029,0.00009396998,0.00004753913,0.00010764314,0.7039465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97803396,0.000993491,0.009689062,0.002001726,0.00030982235,0.00015855355,0.000022209244,0.000031355677,0.008759851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.978124,0.011907848,0.0007562559,0.001718003,0.004919425,0.0025743823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849001,0.010503035,0.0010637908,0.001599673,0.0013418181,0.00059146376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016952403,0.00046258725,0.00093612674,0.0026426506,0.008131559,0.01493127,0.002495505,0.0064338367,0.005598971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02066877,0.00060908456,0.00104184,0.0017675076,0.061744392,0.020570632,0.025031209,0.010455994,0.00064906635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016933601,0.0000032133653,0.000062838626,0.0000056320423,9.3888855e-7,0.000016822834,0.00079614844,0.000072063056,0.000021184562,0.99796665,0.00014401352,0.0009089058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046092173,0.000008000423,0.00008559426,0.000048043392,0.0000026018172,0.000033758773,0.000962992,0.00035602992,0.00010184268,0.98826224,0.010128459,0.000005786102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025456888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018924971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016952403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008098574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005605237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08965397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737924813","doi":"","title":"Dronkenskap as verweer in die Suid-Afrikaanse strafreg : 'n sober benadering? : regte","year":2016,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Litnet Akademies : 'n Joernaal vir die Geesteswetenskappe, Natuurwetenskappe, Regte en Godsdienswetenskappe","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01276365090172694,"score_gpt":0.2885596901187951,"score_spread":0.2757960392170682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737924813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057061918,0.014800632,0.0021652638,0.013540278,0.002652016,0.000094030824,0.0013659319,0.00024034841,0.9080796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26111624,0.010867408,0.002658606,0.0024685746,0.00029818865,0.000090316906,0.0014222496,0.00036544036,0.720713],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922824,0.00015759586,0.000038193924,0.00013234111,0.00022971912,0.0002138063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938095,0.00013894361,0.00006717483,0.00011928908,0.00019145364,0.00010215887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072220364,0.00054466317,0.0003190956,0.0007041885,0.005256071,0.006269891,0.0007497936,0.0012355562,0.059406713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019288338,0.00029143115,0.0004131625,0.0012569346,0.0022802188,0.002443638,0.0026681912,0.0019427948,0.013769129],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027923143,0.000102071324,0.008821201,0.0012639648,0.000050815925,0.0018961398,0.078445934,0.00034290546,0.012038726,0.25579563,0.33241343,0.3085499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057846382,0.000019626817,0.004714569,0.00016118128,0.000011420742,0.00024317298,0.009487657,0.000019073828,0.0009147631,0.0025140133,0.9818916,0.000017182703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11767077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2506514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11767077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041299337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051832646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23397171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W273928470","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Julie Macfarlane, the New Lawyer: How Settlement is Transforming the Practice of Law (Vancouver: UBC Press, 2008)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Settlement (finance); Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.009438984859168716,"score_gpt":0.294223176339749,"score_spread":0.28478419148058026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W273928470","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013645309,0.76942724,0.00038090366,0.08825426,0.047111746,0.00011863189,0.00053567643,0.00009439849,0.09394068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019090807,0.5823548,0.0005290406,0.04405214,0.026855366,0.00016287822,0.0006871025,0.000130643,0.343319],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865973,0.00017619868,0.00006910813,0.00015122772,0.00086372154,0.000080083235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99471915,0.0019386648,0.00028546763,0.00009449315,0.002543363,0.0004187999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011544549,0.0014484974,0.0020563947,0.0047963485,0.0016116243,0.0042632218,0.0018832835,0.0043821684,0.06925813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007663234,0.0006355061,0.0005731163,0.008403019,0.0015013817,0.0039735246,0.001520431,0.0046536475,0.048656147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002104305,0.0000025258933,0.000010672914,0.00023081378,0.0000017349931,0.000012700777,0.000028302977,0.00001453504,0.000010886304,0.00036662354,0.9846169,0.014702219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005160526,0.000005627002,0.0001407282,0.00075225194,0.000005198392,0.000073192175,0.00006653884,0.000012555437,0.0000137357165,0.0005103854,0.99840754,0.000007248278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03367731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.077688776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06925813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005904427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009582646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23169148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742849623","doi":"10.1007/978-981-10-4807-4_6","title":"A Comparative Study on National Refugee Law of South Africa, Brazil and Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Solidarity; Political science; Economic growth; Development economics; Safe haven; Social protection; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.06723739448602464,"score_gpt":0.3495022068919526,"score_spread":0.28226481240592793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742849623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9231589,0.0044052633,0.000083374274,0.0046121483,0.00004766047,0.000064851374,0.00018302073,0.000004384953,0.067440405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841011,0.0048931134,0.00011857851,0.000443513,0.000009050658,0.00003540335,0.00010585951,0.000007697774,0.010285571],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982973,0.00041879318,0.000039822982,0.00008479032,0.00029929224,0.0008599735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99606764,0.0019311582,0.00039154748,0.00008000681,0.00078933773,0.00074012694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016930366,0.00026501517,0.0005338671,0.004085339,0.019507324,0.0052111624,0.0014516957,0.0012727184,0.006656841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008836741,0.00030105,0.0002735782,0.010270763,0.0067739687,0.002632047,0.00396068,0.0022643413,0.00019993147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006274198,0.00016771979,0.050420046,0.00025236956,0.000019250314,0.0026109666,0.8282133,0.00011312367,0.00032310377,0.078622416,0.008016795,0.03117816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058342566,0.000027249967,0.108748905,0.0003353044,0.000016791453,0.0003726557,0.8529211,0.000066613386,0.0000924241,0.0010021044,0.03639458,0.000016389846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9470815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9861481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052918494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04999672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.065136604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36275327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751339960","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340011","title":"Prosecution of Rhino Poachers: The Need to Focus on Prosecution of the Higher Echelons of Organised Crime Networks","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Poaching; Law; Focus (optics); Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.038218407874290955,"score_gpt":0.3204868912000346,"score_spread":0.2822684833257436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751339960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54246014,0.008597732,0.0042946637,0.28902084,0.0010177777,0.00026547472,0.000045624423,0.000048462935,0.15424924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827315,0.0024484266,0.0016070303,0.007634846,0.00017529842,0.00006594393,0.00001835379,0.000014897779,0.0053038145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99106264,0.0040347595,0.00044107097,0.00059641455,0.0011597953,0.002705283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9639882,0.016607534,0.0048217443,0.001080749,0.0059019104,0.0075998767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010544611,0.00019214468,0.00046781386,0.0021136538,0.009907077,0.009455568,0.0015737339,0.0037043146,0.004306833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038173705,0.0002653264,0.0002450102,0.0011110154,0.010071923,0.009350531,0.007797182,0.0060380106,0.00055006164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015196382,0.00037082555,0.1513618,0.0013117527,0.00004893364,0.0040585143,0.18618521,0.0011123474,0.0018482879,0.31280315,0.049009908,0.2917373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006181882,0.00044837923,0.2120519,0.007166594,0.00007342021,0.0032027233,0.5083488,0.0020619435,0.0014493093,0.05354363,0.21144144,0.0001499915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027852764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07466947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027852764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043717846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022886002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055765927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751432287","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340009","title":"Demanding Equal Rights and Treatment of Husbands/Partners in Paternity Disputes: A South African Perspective","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Dignity; Legitimacy; General partnership; Perspective (graphical); Best interests; Law; Political science; Balance (ability); Inequality; Identity (music); Sociology; Law and economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.06506849929916098,"score_gpt":0.37614340719717687,"score_spread":0.3110749078980159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751432287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13344786,0.02397459,0.02502147,0.25966334,0.000930483,0.00023845866,0.00008194074,0.000014925364,0.556627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9683676,0.005510621,0.0034692546,0.009531866,0.00036044532,0.00011154092,0.000012288407,0.000011844047,0.012624708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874315,0.007703504,0.0004035343,0.0006783174,0.0014579733,0.00232518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99011725,0.0070462967,0.0008141767,0.00051764265,0.00075540197,0.00074921077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018604934,0.0006067386,0.00083596364,0.002083405,0.016332572,0.011618989,0.001885059,0.012236612,0.0051026014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01876924,0.0006862228,0.00069210987,0.0018012921,0.052403487,0.014358225,0.009502606,0.011978264,0.0003740541],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036300512,0.0000057925135,0.00012044443,0.000021459575,0.000002199146,0.00021138696,0.0075446707,0.00007217639,0.000060931947,0.9906357,0.00034046912,0.0009810949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032130745,0.000032715572,0.000854049,0.0007533449,0.000020498084,0.00049594557,0.019885803,0.00059848616,0.00025730164,0.9281908,0.048851203,0.000027775779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01955625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019571342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01955625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009011695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014907281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0983935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751606866","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340015","title":"A Human Rights-based Approach to Combating Public Procurement Corruption in Africa","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Accountability; Language change; Transparency (behavior); Procurement; Public administration; Business; Political science; Economic growth; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.16568403885829244,"score_gpt":0.40130538978737484,"score_spread":0.2356213509290824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751606866","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09793901,0.020709623,0.04691322,0.2420921,0.0007989856,0.00040992376,0.000031264877,0.000054788736,0.59105104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95263183,0.0075380746,0.011425046,0.006493974,0.0002972442,0.00014907002,0.000007640333,0.000015097105,0.021442112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546623,0.0028115937,0.00015762378,0.00014671373,0.00055162655,0.000866268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957842,0.0022944985,0.0007259744,0.00019309613,0.00048579933,0.0005163868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067972518,0.00026189303,0.00024048713,0.001535948,0.006026097,0.0069305147,0.00082349475,0.0032167563,0.0029936898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007614415,0.00021010134,0.0002889319,0.0013016565,0.0144298645,0.004659973,0.004641077,0.0037732816,0.00023880407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005258694,0.000034574314,0.00047802553,0.00008956434,0.0000030739054,0.0003413912,0.0068482747,0.00061696366,0.00024452544,0.97613895,0.0023573006,0.012842023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028703007,0.00012606171,0.0035935729,0.0023399005,0.000021203747,0.0007996889,0.02873687,0.002941413,0.0017418065,0.56838095,0.39124194,0.000048000325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055492143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007966856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069305147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006509821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0136381565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04723233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751717206","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340013","title":"The Legal Protection of Development-Induced Displaced Persons in Africa","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Displaced person; Obligation; Internally displaced person; Political science; Convention; Displacement (psychology); Law; Human rights; Economic growth; Refugee; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.0845499542240998,"score_gpt":0.35671151932774603,"score_spread":0.2721615651036462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751717206","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.193735,0.0127882445,0.010771453,0.18562004,0.0008352774,0.00034594254,0.0001455075,0.000039849743,0.5957186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9540588,0.0038331642,0.0030856188,0.016824013,0.0002446486,0.00016148417,0.000027942824,0.000014816308,0.021749534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927389,0.0037205254,0.00043921277,0.00044035734,0.0011381345,0.0015229834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902147,0.00665551,0.001160234,0.00048989337,0.00095670664,0.00052294845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01050663,0.00027545163,0.00043985824,0.0010667782,0.012444396,0.005694044,0.0015369422,0.009090581,0.0045416555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019181708,0.00038909313,0.00033359413,0.0011705216,0.022413267,0.0042299563,0.007417471,0.0069511584,0.0004964378],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051358584,0.000018629951,0.0004589082,0.000044194323,0.0000019463055,0.0005162991,0.02329515,0.00006236656,0.00026974478,0.967839,0.0032429209,0.004245756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061398074,0.00008868429,0.0032111942,0.0034538163,0.00003619292,0.0019784595,0.058187023,0.000780039,0.0018272012,0.3832101,0.5470794,0.00008654578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017920366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01826588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017920366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006532518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01751878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05556506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752705834","doi":"","title":"The unity of public law, David Dyzenhaus (Ed.) : book review","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SA Publiekreg = SA Public Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Immigration; Supreme court; Citizenship; Immigration law; Political science; Residence; Officer; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03494857129783558,"score_gpt":0.31894811548732127,"score_spread":0.2839995441894857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752705834","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014585735,0.92053145,0.00028817414,0.014598984,0.0020582469,0.000012373801,0.00006947368,0.00002650705,0.062268853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0052016224,0.9260925,0.00037559427,0.0053452374,0.002897698,0.000044234155,0.00013919792,0.00004737587,0.059856486],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914455,0.00018159444,0.000053212738,0.000108952554,0.00039393507,0.00011769912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898213,0.0006302468,0.00008480142,0.00005292929,0.00017541376,0.000074494485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009414617,0.00089181983,0.0010765289,0.004078558,0.0022609495,0.008876736,0.0013125502,0.0034263101,0.024346892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027166386,0.00079668395,0.0005010219,0.0075226654,0.004856449,0.010208727,0.0024323552,0.004055929,0.010871821],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000104535,0.0000406281,0.000110196015,0.0010815903,0.0000072542407,0.00007074842,0.0010531823,0.00019944616,0.00003785085,0.113357015,0.7457318,0.13829984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019775437,0.0000028277184,0.00017849731,0.0013255355,0.0000020212533,0.00006757049,0.00028362396,0.000020441148,0.000008471978,0.008445781,0.9896595,0.0000037429256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017179517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027443811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024346892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006902766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008106764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081448436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752856065","doi":"","title":"Meeting of Commonwealth Law Ministers, Winnipeg, August, 1977 : selected memoranda.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books  | UK Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01946732433891963,"score_gpt":0.28834055720422574,"score_spread":0.2688732328653061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752856065","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02873321,0.104617134,0.001132637,0.40037626,0.11142965,0.0010775588,0.013544668,0.00042089616,0.33866796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020909982,0.008529356,0.00050315546,0.010724441,0.0028279496,0.0001337162,0.0009369304,0.00013481815,0.9552996],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919945,0.00008303212,0.00003762628,0.00011122068,0.00023548314,0.00033320938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881685,0.000110381196,0.000067331,0.0000398085,0.00054634345,0.0004194403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012905132,0.00083842827,0.0004353584,0.0012930157,0.00802317,0.0026278256,0.001610427,0.0037455237,0.043865703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033449093,0.0007516454,0.00038280827,0.0015743094,0.001145354,0.0012718381,0.001854719,0.003923901,0.010409926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031553205,0.000009480959,0.00053256145,0.00008824328,0.000003864451,0.00020842024,0.00052528275,0.000023777982,0.0002574135,0.0013928108,0.98946065,0.0074659623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043568675,0.0000046369946,0.0026752823,0.000049138558,0.0000027078631,0.000043750064,0.0006911527,0.000011214825,0.00008318313,0.00007633532,0.9963527,0.0000055372684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48593318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76359725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48593318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009613073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01860547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9662095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755209705","doi":"10.60082/2563-4631.1066","title":"Canada-Botswana Human Rights Engagements: A Critical Assessment of the Literature and a Research Agenda","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Transnational Human Rights Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Environmental ethics; Sustainability; Sociology; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.10623607245805676,"score_gpt":0.48209665959894377,"score_spread":0.375860587140887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755209705","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031070076,0.603452,0.0010633301,0.3163506,0.0021957217,0.0002529943,0.0004236384,0.000021002235,0.045170672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45174992,0.505614,0.0027576191,0.03278221,0.0007569998,0.00039732497,0.0002704159,0.00003821651,0.005633346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97820103,0.008009302,0.0010396715,0.0018095837,0.0066192206,0.0043211933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9018164,0.07013998,0.0037824383,0.0010820212,0.01966182,0.0035173723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03586605,0.0009553423,0.001517919,0.015809137,0.024618376,0.022233414,0.0039472156,0.0059866174,0.0044946484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05605174,0.00069428794,0.0007756781,0.034118954,0.020365728,0.011453799,0.007040542,0.0073227617,0.00026851127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009426001,0.00008153767,0.010259184,0.01953159,0.00017223162,0.001995181,0.21057467,0.0004946719,0.0004360661,0.42555422,0.06726121,0.2635453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015980582,0.00002907943,0.013367816,0.053092018,0.00016158175,0.0005333859,0.38654783,0.00033037513,0.00029195263,0.020642053,0.5248875,0.000100442885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8877238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9538018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1656339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1656339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3434439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9677464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755604978","doi":"10.60082/2563-4631.1074","title":"Evaluating Canadian and South African Collaborative Human Rights Initiatives: A Preliminary Analysis and Research Agenda","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Transnational Human Rights Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Human rights; Law; Political science; Charter; Parliament; Fundamental rights; Bill of rights; Government (linguistics); International human rights law; Population; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.17343914074143107,"score_gpt":0.4854186976573275,"score_spread":0.3119795569158964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755604978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4828754,0.118568435,0.0017582771,0.03664512,0.00043292964,0.004342081,0.0042783585,0.00005823916,0.35104117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92699474,0.045117315,0.0058351015,0.0039002404,0.00008077221,0.0011502297,0.0015669641,0.000024163102,0.015330445],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9803423,0.0059103877,0.0006218193,0.0007612432,0.007861743,0.0045025027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94232595,0.016206572,0.0022251776,0.0007416552,0.034390643,0.0041100476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026741141,0.0008131841,0.0010140926,0.008888486,0.012802048,0.010955051,0.002454953,0.0016648204,0.0065017836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048092786,0.00035671907,0.00060242845,0.023378864,0.0028876418,0.0031092952,0.0031144547,0.0016150529,0.00034342],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013541664,0.0011636902,0.16033673,0.012163352,0.00067860715,0.00089679705,0.082652844,0.002138701,0.0012376135,0.21382463,0.054503042,0.46905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000335314,0.00082154595,0.2935122,0.009816826,0.001226079,0.00029277036,0.2976321,0.0018192582,0.002200377,0.0064763436,0.38566777,0.00019946802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9828872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99314815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17589614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17589614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3190282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9558437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766277717","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v6n1p162","title":"Ownership and Control of Natural Resources under the Nigerian Constitution 1999 and Its Implications for Environmental Law and Practice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Natural resource; Supreme court; Legislature; Constitutional court; Political science; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Public administration","score_opus":0.09625925455456258,"score_gpt":0.444332042772637,"score_spread":0.3480727882180744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766277717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14935239,0.022742696,0.0052040415,0.06836149,0.0011351798,0.00014861797,0.00028381107,0.000014563193,0.7527572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9568155,0.012776264,0.003169616,0.006606554,0.00028865418,0.00016786899,0.00011324081,0.0000109732,0.02005133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99674606,0.0014767965,0.0002446215,0.00033850304,0.0006787399,0.0005152445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99643624,0.0025423674,0.00036980383,0.00019844448,0.00036438316,0.00008876908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004166472,0.00022251798,0.00023662421,0.0009977306,0.0058820555,0.0062561794,0.0005145045,0.0031703808,0.0021396198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071508554,0.000274338,0.00014891656,0.0016142481,0.015033566,0.003737598,0.0017159202,0.0033632496,0.0001821954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045994407,0.000008761296,0.0006804324,0.000020691296,8.4541296e-7,0.00013395034,0.0022036803,0.00010329845,0.000095506024,0.9909733,0.0015634453,0.0042114854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028198036,0.0000572688,0.01634447,0.0021393525,0.000019673933,0.00043083375,0.020058708,0.0008432379,0.00090961327,0.5985955,0.36050445,0.00006857957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040793356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055813268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040793356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006161883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010831555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08111185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770710527","doi":"10.3968/9945","title":"Gender Apartheid and Its Effect on Family Relationships in TsiTsi Dangaremgba’s Nervous Conditions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in literature and language","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deconstruction (building); Perspective (graphical); Gender studies; Masculinity; Sociology; Institution; Subject (documents); Gender equality; Social science","score_opus":0.06260694584297503,"score_gpt":0.39065571964038853,"score_spread":0.3280487737974135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770710527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95741796,0.0037861646,0.00023537442,0.0047185295,0.000071663526,0.000013636822,0.00001746916,0.000003800513,0.033735506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980438,0.0008094803,0.000040027782,0.00010363947,0.0000074456134,0.0000048252637,0.0000024530277,0.000001266082,0.0009870188],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911493,0.0005130429,0.000022977469,0.000042221585,0.0000700954,0.0002366074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993938,0.00031003723,0.00015416816,0.000017224773,0.00003244958,0.00009237751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008778224,0.00022765965,0.00024891263,0.0007191426,0.010955309,0.0023166146,0.0003735956,0.00070618547,0.0042126826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001585435,0.00015478522,0.00014217079,0.0009632118,0.008733508,0.0016442233,0.0035173513,0.0014067675,0.00013038954],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047828074,0.000054473276,0.012504271,0.0001209879,0.000008500178,0.007861897,0.9084888,0.00008258782,0.0009210066,0.054606773,0.0010212245,0.014281605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004819907,0.00004165885,0.021702483,0.0002737073,0.000012893143,0.0021717465,0.94531757,0.000067868175,0.00028765338,0.005586838,0.024517084,0.00001565954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015030382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029686363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015030382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034433275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00258133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029885769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770867543","doi":"","title":"An appraisal of selected tax-enforcement powers of the South African revenue service in the South African constitutional context","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Enforcement; Revenue; Internal revenue; Service (business); Political science; Tax revenue; Business; Public administration; Accounting; Law; Geography; Marketing","score_opus":0.017108304068763822,"score_gpt":0.2753670594740499,"score_spread":0.25825875540528603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770867543","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15759963,0.62871504,0.0009309455,0.02123317,0.0007945984,0.00013722747,0.00021435926,0.000011588869,0.19036353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6077322,0.3839235,0.00079715124,0.0025725414,0.0003879742,0.000054138443,0.0001190415,0.000012493485,0.004401043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99632746,0.0014464845,0.0004085857,0.00020561718,0.0010830527,0.0005287558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99339515,0.004405499,0.000956261,0.00013222806,0.0009915006,0.00011927506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005164293,0.00026174946,0.00044254,0.007861678,0.0037488684,0.0057917777,0.000760663,0.0011039649,0.003169537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008963952,0.00037481292,0.00038064452,0.012799885,0.0058040395,0.0038141967,0.0015967998,0.0020246028,0.00026906966],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010247486,0.00006201861,0.008739652,0.01143759,0.00008108415,0.00321187,0.05111632,0.0008598431,0.002318273,0.7143149,0.010461301,0.19729477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017084938,0.0001251659,0.045574844,0.014372329,0.00015856363,0.0016543774,0.057123806,0.000335846,0.0017999847,0.020267716,0.85850704,0.00006326419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026508914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05074404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026508914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008959564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011762451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065006495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771410415","doi":"10.1080/02587203.2002.11827658","title":"The Evolution of Standing Rules in South Africa and their Significance in Promoting Social Justice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal on Human Rights","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Jurisprudence; Law; Enforcement; Political science; Economic Justice; Scope (computer science); Social justice; Human rights; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04690604526550103,"score_gpt":0.29780502622233795,"score_spread":0.25089898095683694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771410415","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50443363,0.0072948253,0.022693342,0.017600812,0.00013277333,0.00022578982,0.00008244564,0.00004944538,0.44748694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894979,0.0011556078,0.0035604343,0.00026168284,0.000024571329,0.000036453,0.000011822125,0.000017085797,0.0054345205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99640024,0.0014354641,0.00026558686,0.00035461644,0.0007128366,0.00083125447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944015,0.0026731426,0.0012769955,0.00045678572,0.0007073544,0.00048414263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057288343,0.0002632855,0.00030436073,0.0027374106,0.0064169955,0.0067327437,0.0006943627,0.0012937733,0.0029289883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015514358,0.00045683532,0.00026261012,0.0030433668,0.017376592,0.004923459,0.0037088187,0.0027449059,0.00022964591],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019649025,0.000012601992,0.0042551323,0.00006375848,0.0000060756056,0.000427595,0.023631949,0.0004906051,0.0012847725,0.93601996,0.0004730293,0.033314835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048981332,0.00012686364,0.065414324,0.0008610354,0.000028696115,0.0009819228,0.026084507,0.0018342662,0.0024915847,0.6370953,0.26488772,0.00014493975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022708517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038442407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022708517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0108777005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077198083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07892358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791107529","doi":"10.7176/nmmc.vol6731-45","title":"Strengths, Constraints and Gaps in HIV and AIDS Education Communication Process among NGOs in Kenya","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journals & Books Hosting (International Knowledge Sharing Platform)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"African Union; International Development Research Centre; Danish International Development Agency; London School of Economics and Political Science; UNICEF; World Bank Group; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services","keywords":"Bar chart; Pie chart; Psychological intervention; Conformity; Thematic analysis; Triangulation; Graphics; Process (computing); Psychology; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Medical education; Qualitative research; Public relations; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Medicine; Social psychology; Social science; Geography; Family medicine","score_opus":0.02942231717054093,"score_gpt":0.37201229214433984,"score_spread":0.3425899749737989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791107529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99074346,0.00092589133,0.00017911442,0.0016340975,0.000015223939,0.00007078787,0.000019546287,0.0000022051797,0.006409739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984263,0.00069508114,0.00029883234,0.00012417049,0.000005084119,0.000050567767,0.000010738278,0.0000015794147,0.0003876792],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99183935,0.0050327373,0.0004970584,0.00036775004,0.0009454281,0.0013177438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98782825,0.0074232374,0.0024079036,0.00024725357,0.0006840724,0.0014092781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076249796,0.0002917275,0.0004106506,0.0014699873,0.009477916,0.004459776,0.00077572063,0.00087242655,0.0030113067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018885747,0.00040737423,0.00012807913,0.0019714115,0.0032957697,0.0046018553,0.003723707,0.00087651063,0.00015573461],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001453584,0.00015743091,0.12869236,0.00068698695,0.000023093236,0.0027080888,0.8170129,0.00011911955,0.0008764009,0.0044923346,0.0005414685,0.044544425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070216784,0.000088369285,0.049393356,0.0007011645,0.000016181672,0.00044887856,0.94122475,0.00009779303,0.0001146322,0.00093524804,0.00695247,0.000020140606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010322598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023543678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010322598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032312172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009053582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040325224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793895311","doi":"10.3390/laws7010008","title":"Living on the Global Peripheries of Law: Disability Human Rights Law in Principle and in Practice in the Global South","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Laws","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Context (archaeology); International human rights law; Law; Political science; Oppression; International law; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.027062429510614452,"score_gpt":0.3661809971483927,"score_spread":0.33911856763777826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793895311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29484254,0.016768109,0.0034447324,0.13688762,0.00047910877,0.000092225775,0.00003523919,0.00004173653,0.5474087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752753,0.003983682,0.0009555633,0.007925294,0.000097407225,0.00007137442,0.000012797864,0.000022185282,0.011656452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996472,0.0020831425,0.00009947779,0.00028528343,0.00031729537,0.0007429097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756867,0.0015399319,0.00026423065,0.00018022608,0.0001373826,0.0003095451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035045776,0.00041889472,0.0003191041,0.0015896737,0.0150233535,0.011148392,0.0008064989,0.0059502763,0.0038935167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033706517,0.00025282978,0.00028189213,0.0022806074,0.06110244,0.009318817,0.0137092,0.0072747204,0.00033799055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075504113,0.000017913791,0.0020891528,0.00010626073,0.0000028992538,0.0018558694,0.21935976,0.00013546311,0.00032732965,0.7633832,0.0028242832,0.009890341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001260462,0.000049493025,0.0068034423,0.0015068351,0.0000129679265,0.0021207156,0.5347606,0.00013945198,0.00042928584,0.19781086,0.25631586,0.00003790653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0192492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038637854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0192492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010841343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009224419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07865977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795423455","doi":"10.18820/24150517/jjs42.v2.5","title":"Can law avoid creating culture and religion in its own image? The context for diversity, religion and culture in MEC for Education: KwaZulu-Natal and Others v Navaneethum Pillay: Reflections a decade later","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Diversity (politics); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Conscience; Law; Ambivalence; Political science; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02303375758220615,"score_gpt":0.3737030121332806,"score_spread":0.35066925455107445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795423455","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1331827,0.02113343,0.0015466487,0.56387913,0.0025851002,0.00013351605,0.00005039494,0.000019916983,0.27746916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89190775,0.003278475,0.0006154227,0.058795884,0.00041085988,0.00012673928,0.000014029394,0.000022887127,0.044827946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962314,0.0014959059,0.00014274736,0.00034957618,0.00055358134,0.0012268206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828374,0.0011490042,0.00015386096,0.000114934934,0.00014553031,0.00015288989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044734757,0.0002923746,0.00034563112,0.00048302696,0.012044811,0.00712042,0.0012559216,0.008834744,0.0035946816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006377319,0.00035935803,0.00041449073,0.0004998551,0.023309726,0.0078014294,0.005541016,0.010899778,0.00033193367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021569049,0.000022507842,0.00066659256,0.00010072655,0.000007479471,0.00057402306,0.04586378,0.00006156921,0.0008453294,0.93069386,0.012097555,0.009045053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004360069,0.00008034106,0.008346942,0.00079776003,0.000028938315,0.00047797814,0.068443544,0.00014610928,0.0015677009,0.12440399,0.7955425,0.00012057183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07795373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1372928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07795373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01222892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0084401425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15499997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796284979","doi":"","title":"AMELIORATIVE PROGRAMS AND THE CHARTER: REFLECTIONS ON THE SECTION 15(2) LANDSCAPE SINCE R V KAPP","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Charter; Scrutiny; Deference; Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Suspect; Political science; Government (linguistics); Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03111939339729341,"score_gpt":0.3405103882080994,"score_spread":0.309390994810806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796284979","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020852499,0.024543446,0.010295787,0.66312575,0.0042808587,0.00009688086,0.00020466557,0.00011564532,0.27648443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59448844,0.012754213,0.007765863,0.3299478,0.0026875716,0.00018439193,0.00010957195,0.00017117076,0.05189103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9603712,0.012686386,0.00092357583,0.0042478307,0.014276623,0.0074944533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794113,0.013216007,0.0009619054,0.0007606657,0.0044591366,0.0011909365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034086708,0.0005554127,0.0008831734,0.0018815105,0.020537945,0.026706072,0.005362464,0.02044036,0.0030907274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035171714,0.0008439051,0.001243564,0.0030476465,0.07274192,0.011709177,0.0078046075,0.03387316,0.00031816514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046207683,0.0000066825232,0.000086042724,0.00003504636,0.0000021672954,0.0000674864,0.0041762325,0.00018073477,0.00005000029,0.9753213,0.015788913,0.004280906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028207409,0.000048492308,0.0018032023,0.0007190047,0.000020175235,0.00011790134,0.011725156,0.0005996639,0.00048387976,0.26367384,0.7206066,0.00017380757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7675529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78860885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7675529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.079378836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13716175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57593644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796901051","doi":"10.1163/22134514-45060016","title":"The Methodology Used to Interpret Customary Land Tenure","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Customary land; Land tenure; Adjudication; Jurisdiction; Law; Statutory law; Common law; Indigenous; Political science; Statutory interpretation; Legislation; Land law; Geography","score_opus":0.07231443054933451,"score_gpt":0.3534564155081441,"score_spread":0.2811419849588096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796901051","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042749878,0.0043146005,0.54439294,0.0102560865,0.0024161434,0.0059828614,0.005463959,0.00032378008,0.3840997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32539907,0.005783207,0.53981304,0.006561743,0.00085526553,0.0123147145,0.0034510288,0.00051718927,0.10530478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9781713,0.009791913,0.0024889861,0.0030267192,0.0055035404,0.0010176498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832191,0.008746978,0.0020594837,0.0018520575,0.0039237924,0.00019859256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016195485,0.00066496263,0.00085789745,0.007945572,0.0047294847,0.007589827,0.002620805,0.0026789438,0.010358336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03137674,0.000589864,0.001297133,0.00986883,0.01392901,0.0049445615,0.003984847,0.0040304367,0.0029348359],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027549975,0.00005587488,0.0053773,0.0005085785,0.000033608656,0.00033101471,0.017044509,0.0005604686,0.0011446859,0.9161065,0.009926054,0.048883803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032307857,0.0001568119,0.012580159,0.0015471689,0.00004180142,0.0010248735,0.015803974,0.002330312,0.0035982225,0.29563332,0.6671375,0.00011360581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013739703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013542509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016195485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006998991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008171356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08565098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797246365","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2018/v21i0a4496","title":"An Analysis of the Regulatory Environment Governing Hearsay Electronic Evidence in South Africa: Suggestions for Reform – Part Two","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Statutory law; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Legislation; Common law; Commission; Law reform; History","score_opus":0.02600647097165336,"score_gpt":0.3086666323383723,"score_spread":0.28266016136671895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797246365","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07370695,0.045041587,0.029858995,0.76297593,0.0015372789,0.0014088453,0.00014991488,0.00007317048,0.08524744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7178557,0.051094797,0.05651325,0.13219398,0.0017315389,0.0012519116,0.00013550684,0.00011783495,0.03910562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97226197,0.014170515,0.002364677,0.0017682107,0.0049228524,0.004511849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95429283,0.031080287,0.0038285821,0.001451899,0.00809961,0.0012466862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03572494,0.00064745627,0.000994856,0.0048690992,0.006520142,0.018046292,0.003126688,0.011089403,0.005357131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05698507,0.0011523449,0.0013978913,0.0040133246,0.015544909,0.016541451,0.0069276956,0.011259458,0.0006269502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088273075,0.00012245805,0.0028281696,0.0018320318,0.00004105584,0.0026520083,0.02626508,0.001760468,0.0030514635,0.900507,0.009578854,0.05127305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015266059,0.0002956039,0.013530443,0.008647278,0.00016012216,0.0014979491,0.07515619,0.003519038,0.0070518088,0.23639098,0.65321004,0.00038781637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043541115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044428587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043541115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023064077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06799658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18893379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801111753","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v28i1.14290","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES TO SCHOOL RULES*","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.03890829450555221,"score_gpt":0.31985550496035153,"score_spread":0.2809472104547993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801111753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028865319,0.004924907,0.010362794,0.26960775,0.0023407396,0.00017709899,0.00048006853,0.00013092678,0.6831104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78555334,0.0023733408,0.0060886694,0.10975681,0.002289258,0.0003149617,0.00035125762,0.00015128135,0.09312112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9660652,0.00901067,0.0020365522,0.005522161,0.010165791,0.0071996865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97353595,0.015105152,0.0013772703,0.002820733,0.005134001,0.0020269444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02885523,0.00043884324,0.0010392522,0.0012800973,0.015569727,0.020443097,0.0046815514,0.020026214,0.008628672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043844867,0.0009051434,0.0011469005,0.0016424897,0.033695787,0.008157545,0.0076906052,0.026903065,0.0014877532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004568831,0.000009185738,0.00014913446,0.00001031979,0.0000038070252,0.000043640914,0.0014474478,0.00011365293,0.000037401525,0.986188,0.010057174,0.001935699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051323233,0.000035838995,0.0010587417,0.0002525823,0.000022381191,0.00012852345,0.003902988,0.0004938893,0.00037662697,0.56232953,0.4312683,0.000079202146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13090527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13912663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13090527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01836234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031391997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26028663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886092291","doi":"10.1108/ijpl-05-2018-0025","title":"Citizen engagement in South Africa: the case Prince Albert","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Leadership","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public engagement; Community engagement; Public relations; Originality; Value (mathematics); Political science; Construct (python library); Local government; Civic engagement; Unit (ring theory); Constitution; Government (linguistics); Social engagement; Sociology; Public administration; Qualitative research; Psychology; Politics; Social science; Computer science; Law; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.21391069724016276,"score_gpt":0.36654543500319875,"score_spread":0.152634737763036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886092291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9089734,0.0027653358,0.0010279982,0.033553164,0.00016689647,0.00016805057,0.00003275591,0.000018488197,0.05329402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813424,0.002654189,0.0008205667,0.0022043695,0.000049062874,0.00011827271,0.000011365451,0.000016659309,0.012783173],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99661833,0.0021859426,0.000075209886,0.00013037532,0.00018716481,0.00080301915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968182,0.0015196854,0.0003932597,0.00012904065,0.0001620664,0.0009777485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002790356,0.00047110996,0.00041982858,0.0011910134,0.030582445,0.004147238,0.0009842404,0.004138527,0.0052035395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066258423,0.0004863122,0.00038336028,0.0020829043,0.010060895,0.00370255,0.0065338304,0.0046058805,0.00062287046],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065032276,0.00014374616,0.007505155,0.00034539026,0.000013423881,0.07499142,0.84810495,0.00024101963,0.00062394765,0.045003407,0.0061052367,0.016857324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010705308,0.000082342114,0.0050332905,0.0005015037,0.000014156121,0.014283725,0.84799,0.00021968644,0.00036239377,0.005270013,0.1261997,0.00003240245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034059215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.069952436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034059215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006766036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007659424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06772196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886131258","doi":"10.1080/00083968.2018.1492511","title":"Domains of Freedom: Justice, Citizenship and Social Change in South Africa","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Social justice; Economic Justice; Social change; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Criminology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.08095709864198207,"score_gpt":0.300244981895898,"score_spread":0.2192878832539159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886131258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6121246,0.05869379,0.0017195353,0.18019325,0.0004548203,0.00007250188,0.00013575447,0.000010153698,0.14659552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916441,0.0059813135,0.00016942786,0.00064294814,0.000037332728,0.000018991776,0.000017037144,0.0000020538128,0.0014867362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979825,0.0014150837,0.000053772248,0.00006528545,0.00015589058,0.0003274902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795806,0.0010918239,0.00027240807,0.00007335211,0.00012591235,0.00047841188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031936455,0.00018696787,0.00028185477,0.0014715728,0.00559068,0.0059617893,0.00041900194,0.0012080692,0.002723349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004382324,0.00014178739,0.00027176074,0.0027088455,0.014565649,0.006844688,0.005921193,0.0021290823,0.000108186476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005525061,0.000069356785,0.023702305,0.00030939406,0.000017637241,0.00040180577,0.21405499,0.0005005854,0.0002565324,0.7026355,0.01118001,0.046816614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029791523,0.000046020243,0.1110275,0.0020346032,0.000030097399,0.00042331457,0.39699337,0.00074149825,0.00039795763,0.3301619,0.1580536,0.00006032459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04506524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08451865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04506524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005692748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008259848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08960581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W28862002","doi":"10.1021/acs.joc.7b01841","title":"The inclusivity of communal land tenure : a redefinition of ownership in Canada and South Africa?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review = Stellenbosch Regstydskrif","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"State Administration of Foreign Experts Affairs; Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province; Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Land tenure; Compromise; Land law; Jurisdiction; Individualism; Property (philosophy); Political science; Law; Institution; Security of tenure; Common law; Property rights; Sociology; Law and economics; Geography","score_opus":0.044231689386051765,"score_gpt":0.27526492582951534,"score_spread":0.23103323644346357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W28862002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8867889,0.002840782,0.00027532794,0.01357753,0.000058026057,0.000033701166,0.00015717199,0.000004450168,0.09626412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99427587,0.0005598834,0.000054522094,0.00037359944,0.0000053335357,0.00000429275,0.000010650872,0.0000021496517,0.004713718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985839,0.00014839743,0.000029937377,0.00011371603,0.0003072682,0.00081687816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805224,0.0004312837,0.00030443963,0.0000974183,0.0005571504,0.00055743376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010097822,0.00013680539,0.00015844377,0.0012141736,0.007986453,0.0034844377,0.0008524493,0.0009614579,0.0052264887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037409805,0.00015542042,0.00013658576,0.0020695687,0.0064286017,0.0015996584,0.0018253304,0.0017476053,0.00011672161],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023607911,0.000101897465,0.17382537,0.00027137372,0.000059607068,0.00474983,0.13669689,0.0007467832,0.0052407673,0.5434009,0.013678519,0.12099203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005111013,0.00008535274,0.4263698,0.0009775027,0.0000800596,0.0014648949,0.21837248,0.0011132892,0.0039697257,0.020484013,0.32687005,0.00016174535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94122905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98028344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058770955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035586856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03859488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2582019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887699319","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.2.04","title":"<i>R v Kapp</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Prima facie; Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Section (typography); Argument (complex analysis); Indigenous; Political science; Race (biology); Sociology; Gender studies; Business","score_opus":0.022998339544274767,"score_gpt":0.2750613597648385,"score_spread":0.2520630202205637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887699319","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012136901,0.0027348178,0.003077879,0.13298135,0.0049901675,0.00041017355,0.0029108124,0.0008405991,0.83991736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10198784,0.00106452,0.0034400718,0.50856346,0.0012280426,0.00039755128,0.0008131979,0.00022838335,0.3822769],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99132043,0.00042393935,0.00021220227,0.0008122235,0.0036653467,0.003565885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99651754,0.0008090603,0.00013595678,0.00015902176,0.0020126211,0.0003659147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026590428,0.00059497735,0.0007427764,0.0012119423,0.012420404,0.0120698195,0.00450743,0.016258819,0.013482513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0078567285,0.0010013421,0.0017116023,0.0013224235,0.0060210587,0.0017291205,0.002750357,0.013490762,0.004728643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035916375,0.000027554144,0.0008531734,0.000088668676,0.000020385394,0.00052610686,0.0016700374,0.00031739243,0.00059774524,0.39207727,0.59571254,0.0080732675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000323698,0.000029966764,0.0037871448,0.00027644154,0.00005631504,0.0002487605,0.0018928925,0.00076629367,0.00088652124,0.017098121,0.9747737,0.00015148528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9161821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9439465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9161821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032714557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0630302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23736185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892686722","doi":"","title":"An analysis of assisted dying and the practical implementation thereof in South African criminal law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03286761464082161,"score_gpt":0.34888528235265354,"score_spread":0.31601766771183193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892686722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42104143,0.00810799,0.0068058786,0.048941534,0.00022722119,0.00039960296,0.00005550049,0.00001173207,0.5144091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765909,0.0041949903,0.0012671761,0.0012878967,0.000041078198,0.0001210526,0.00001336671,0.0000072211287,0.016476363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99399406,0.003949007,0.00016319627,0.00015531747,0.00064971694,0.0010887479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99264646,0.005468212,0.000703447,0.00021044543,0.0006091485,0.0003622541],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068350197,0.0002654957,0.00027497983,0.002191324,0.012926665,0.006748134,0.0010502642,0.0024538704,0.006711882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015211432,0.0002529508,0.0003458625,0.0033151298,0.020211572,0.00596299,0.005152425,0.0041875537,0.00029635467],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000557569,0.000020245501,0.0007780087,0.000089409674,0.000002589986,0.00055088697,0.08115418,0.00023349132,0.000076551965,0.9093417,0.0010108335,0.006736496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015156387,0.00006747787,0.012067888,0.0019391889,0.000018812594,0.0008053682,0.5715894,0.0013323332,0.00054857426,0.21260251,0.19897383,0.00003947731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01855562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03271516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01855562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014591022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017327907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10586578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896546039","doi":"10.15173/glj.v9i3.3709","title":"Review of: Bridget Kenny (2018) Retail Worker Politics, Race and Consumption in South Africa: Shelved in the Service Economy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Labour Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Consumption (sociology); Service (business); Politics; Business; Economy; Economics; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.03485706099039951,"score_gpt":0.31004326146990957,"score_spread":0.27518620047951003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896546039","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013391438,0.80321336,0.00009815773,0.10090243,0.09045759,0.000018956473,0.0003610403,0.000012630214,0.0048018917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031610178,0.8517796,0.00014758638,0.044291165,0.08269293,0.000054779764,0.00033344838,0.000031078314,0.017508531],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911386,0.00016687943,0.00014392959,0.00021208216,0.00027085163,0.000092423004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908043,0.004499385,0.0008704076,0.00018084548,0.0027863802,0.00085871376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023740476,0.0013195348,0.0024369585,0.004781365,0.0016398091,0.0051257443,0.0025601643,0.006401461,0.03487225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01598929,0.00054302026,0.00060572865,0.008462795,0.0025167274,0.006457087,0.0033283245,0.0051782145,0.014190371],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019220925,0.000010395912,0.00018251041,0.0037340848,0.000012820085,0.00006155994,0.00030997844,0.000027638695,0.000040346593,0.0020585617,0.93650985,0.057033002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069220264,0.0000066680564,0.0009535431,0.0065560755,0.00002842077,0.00012554934,0.0004612243,0.000011630705,0.000028932414,0.00082887034,0.9909775,0.000014677218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015530855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03181423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03487225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030274563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007737764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11665934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898257162","doi":"","title":"Don't Think about Elephants: Reece V. City of Edmonton","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New Brunswick Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Geography","score_opus":0.024823107416675337,"score_gpt":0.27188806588370523,"score_spread":0.2470649584670299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898257162","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10221438,0.003469004,0.0005040079,0.49195603,0.0016051118,0.000082177125,0.00014726698,0.000058231977,0.39996377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29855224,0.0023837425,0.0005080264,0.42732918,0.0005361377,0.000098914345,0.00006840353,0.00009701578,0.2704264],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983011,0.00027547943,0.000029518922,0.00018439301,0.00032455535,0.00088499946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980544,0.0008887615,0.00008677416,0.00006950618,0.0002894089,0.0006113211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026723426,0.00040449822,0.00038307518,0.0004965606,0.021314172,0.0047060135,0.0019018294,0.013250357,0.01696656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056988103,0.0006330829,0.0005630304,0.00046351532,0.0042898473,0.0029017986,0.002814961,0.01974224,0.00111995],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016603016,0.00018420327,0.011923146,0.000117655334,0.00006438551,0.008190635,0.028236374,0.000294051,0.0010670057,0.22067352,0.69808954,0.030993517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018060138,0.00012621433,0.023195272,0.0011012785,0.00024207825,0.0017790089,0.06615458,0.00055271504,0.0023384262,0.023635615,0.88048995,0.00020431743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46428144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8007981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53571856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008307493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024225745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92315805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899483506","doi":"10.4324/9780203125113-13","title":"Building a sanctuary city: municipal migrant rights in the city of Toronto","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Migrant workers; Right to the city; Socioeconomics; Environmental planning; Environmental protection; Political science; Economic growth; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.047393004482735854,"score_gpt":0.32385182790282463,"score_spread":0.27645882342008876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899483506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11376731,0.022616014,0.0010059244,0.06705487,0.00094557356,0.000084519226,0.00018116052,0.00004087964,0.7943037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73251027,0.0076407893,0.00051442283,0.0019761908,0.0002145543,0.00005397355,0.000064550644,0.000057176487,0.25696808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993411,0.00016646621,0.000012864082,0.000049941005,0.00007738371,0.00035216138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964094,0.00005909811,0.000035065066,0.000015733718,0.000047636397,0.0002015701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050273404,0.00046119947,0.00024317697,0.00045120457,0.02383084,0.007948354,0.001012089,0.002819639,0.0134132225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008377507,0.00034151084,0.0002432971,0.0015358895,0.010453651,0.0030262116,0.0038160307,0.0034552896,0.00050175167],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016807415,0.00001651167,0.0021124724,0.00008407523,0.000006275515,0.0010956483,0.17600513,0.0004537539,0.00016976376,0.70522845,0.10022355,0.014587573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000867383,0.000014632659,0.008254671,0.00024153825,0.000012112589,0.00028004154,0.19569004,0.00021827949,0.00014962866,0.019290002,0.7758126,0.000027817207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8590722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96889436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14092779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04678083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035185996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3394202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899664618","doi":"","title":"Reforming tradition : a conversation with Remi De Roo","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Art; Sociology; Communication","score_opus":0.03070545907861777,"score_gpt":0.29519848350421857,"score_spread":0.2644930244256008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899664618","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21420003,0.010611741,0.0014007951,0.61344665,0.0031940306,0.00011718807,0.00006208819,0.000055264154,0.1569122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8104605,0.0031722318,0.0011427279,0.12152895,0.0007150075,0.00012013085,0.000021809748,0.00014158708,0.06269708],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917303,0.005465636,0.00013439801,0.00050531054,0.000858733,0.0013055848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925372,0.004899534,0.0004095346,0.00022402304,0.0007422393,0.0011874621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010043798,0.00040357313,0.00072014146,0.00088262366,0.025061646,0.0065557254,0.001504852,0.008749544,0.0028067292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016278118,0.00050965324,0.00032195332,0.0009462062,0.019245096,0.006706388,0.003431681,0.019330608,0.00041750137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000328265,0.000044738106,0.000552497,0.000053307784,0.0000062054714,0.0012214597,0.8907119,0.00006815504,0.0005088542,0.05693964,0.04545464,0.004405764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013399215,0.000035511857,0.00076995254,0.0002537307,0.0000069893385,0.00051110965,0.5553123,0.00012938661,0.00041040347,0.003506317,0.43900588,0.000045046265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14567721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24600929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14567721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016144395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009809697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28965855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901208680","doi":"","title":"Canadian Tort Law since Cooper v. Hobart: Part II","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Political science; History; Liability","score_opus":0.07780419096957743,"score_gpt":0.3282948075439705,"score_spread":0.2504906165743931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901208680","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06952694,0.015878022,0.0007931431,0.124687515,0.0034409992,0.00027866568,0.004826959,0.00014792837,0.78041977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36359274,0.008270268,0.0010409408,0.047650203,0.0008196938,0.00012044145,0.0011342068,0.00012043191,0.5772511],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942472,0.00020944206,0.0001076681,0.00049400993,0.0026527124,0.0022890058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99433076,0.00092551654,0.00024225049,0.00019384974,0.0031464768,0.0011611125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002589012,0.0005795979,0.0004964449,0.0026362587,0.023101637,0.0077485275,0.001980794,0.008889784,0.016418504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008933783,0.0006445085,0.00068939506,0.004067742,0.0050093383,0.0016784511,0.0018047857,0.006998687,0.0012612172],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009208549,0.00008042785,0.006984835,0.00020862251,0.000056058227,0.00077540765,0.0066919583,0.00036338987,0.000696661,0.26425615,0.68912715,0.030667283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021954185,0.000028318287,0.02650854,0.00020647675,0.00007024676,0.00021782995,0.0027480356,0.00015385092,0.0009225089,0.0045515955,0.96447664,0.00009391893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9894902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.112021714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.112021714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16468127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81277823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901806227","doi":"","title":"Episode 5 – The Stories We Tell: Site-C, Treaty 8, and the Duty to Consult and Accommodate","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Appeal; Duty; Indigenous; Law; Context (archaeology); Piano; Common law; Political science; History; Art history; Archaeology","score_opus":0.031235272530211904,"score_gpt":0.3566375705211476,"score_spread":0.3254022979909357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901806227","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21606651,0.0115692485,0.0027536156,0.29553965,0.004631783,0.00038869548,0.000877897,0.0001280552,0.4680446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8294428,0.006536094,0.00089284964,0.04076069,0.0009478736,0.0004404328,0.00039024834,0.00016839108,0.12042053],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99479866,0.0025632456,0.00013474547,0.00023915965,0.000829931,0.0014343464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969879,0.0015902423,0.00032103702,0.00013428288,0.0003607434,0.000605878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024502117,0.00039242033,0.00051040895,0.0008757614,0.024573635,0.007861797,0.0014745438,0.0069092643,0.010520937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012841719,0.0004547403,0.00033337856,0.001636257,0.011900575,0.0075512994,0.008501293,0.013841279,0.0014481347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028845194,0.000034204568,0.0007705891,0.00015028052,0.0000046373034,0.0030857506,0.77553546,0.00004194666,0.00016608048,0.08732323,0.12591201,0.0069469367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042944034,0.000008541419,0.0007739476,0.00030848006,0.000002733722,0.0007588504,0.53270423,0.000016857857,0.0001107176,0.0038168752,0.46148357,0.00001089098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.091511115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13829564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90848887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011452887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073012183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18195695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906192178","doi":"","title":"CRISTINA DÂMBOEANU, comparative assessments related to the proportions of different forms of abuse against children","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Demography; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.2834720507559977,"score_gpt":0.5885304650544665,"score_spread":0.3050584142984688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906192178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60886025,0.23644583,0.0064273747,0.018569594,0.0012880255,0.00026819576,0.0028225332,0.00009107861,0.12522714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94889975,0.037690952,0.007016807,0.0009544682,0.00045728756,0.00012280094,0.00087667815,0.000055088625,0.0039260676],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99656373,0.0020401087,0.00021097089,0.00030576176,0.00070407917,0.0001753364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965695,0.0017802445,0.0006841324,0.00020931276,0.00063438265,0.00012230546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003457936,0.0002733159,0.00029999448,0.0049819103,0.0009051675,0.0012652918,0.00036063456,0.0003210314,0.002746995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012613001,0.00018526956,0.00027947352,0.0041848645,0.001445552,0.0010344494,0.001267017,0.00047363417,0.0002917214],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006263791,0.00011162535,0.3154055,0.0038676723,0.00028374806,0.00149728,0.03708637,0.0010174334,0.0024520452,0.10007563,0.03747859,0.50009775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023398217,0.00027641642,0.6192753,0.0020747276,0.000084328945,0.006456086,0.019390622,0.0003433816,0.0025041054,0.007963675,0.34154207,0.00006601253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007798934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006510651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007798934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009432021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012128726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01828754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911000279","doi":"","title":"Araya v nevsun resources and law reform","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brief","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Corporation","score_opus":0.018462271836035708,"score_gpt":0.30150714718248695,"score_spread":0.28304487534645123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911000279","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03622529,0.0107981,0.0007790211,0.18330543,0.0010153317,0.00006032949,0.00011401803,0.000036194673,0.7676662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74271536,0.004878765,0.00102289,0.10490594,0.0007804658,0.0001834574,0.00008696555,0.000027933778,0.14539829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957632,0.0012407614,0.00010300148,0.00041405318,0.0010011066,0.0014778242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981343,0.0011027463,0.00012265275,0.00012561792,0.0003606282,0.00015402923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003134323,0.00025480593,0.00035986715,0.00067763973,0.010415232,0.0058584632,0.0012610592,0.0095777875,0.0072287247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008614652,0.00022327965,0.00043434702,0.0006931951,0.010265457,0.0029295469,0.0033139202,0.009281376,0.0005752227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011044418,0.000016675349,0.00027348823,0.00003426706,0.0000037508717,0.00018377037,0.0017862472,0.00013138537,0.00015553848,0.96261585,0.029697062,0.0050910497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045071658,0.000044347547,0.0036818725,0.00048453684,0.000019273848,0.00019995403,0.004165082,0.0004345689,0.00042840806,0.1651524,0.82528895,0.00005552353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20224899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2630195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20224899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012941038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021728681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40214354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913543067","doi":"10.5539/jsd.v12n1p139","title":"“Against All Odds”. Female Small Scale Mine Owners in Gwanda, Zimbabwe","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sustainable Development","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Odds; Scale (ratio); Face (sociological concept); Mining industry; Business; Capital (architecture); Economic growth; Political science; Economics; Geography; Sociology; Law; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.01656831201432625,"score_gpt":0.27416558831235316,"score_spread":0.2575972762980269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913543067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9673899,0.0014352304,0.00029343955,0.017322125,0.00009709685,0.000038525926,0.00011539985,0.0000054537577,0.013302853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900281,0.0009682623,0.00014094368,0.001432147,0.000022542235,0.000019817106,0.000024880694,0.0000025480695,0.0073608],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996594,0.000110749104,0.000007843553,0.00003453745,0.00004738205,0.0001399937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969447,0.00006389677,0.000113967195,0.000012247966,0.00004087065,0.00007456766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044229373,0.00013516846,0.000101280966,0.00040112753,0.003100282,0.0011560747,0.00036165278,0.0005109775,0.0074192197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013520714,0.0001319604,0.00007369921,0.0004947541,0.0016088086,0.0014285191,0.0011248919,0.000493617,0.0004960324],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014668032,0.00011806268,0.44768998,0.0004497742,0.000029273715,0.0047196546,0.3815362,0.000104418024,0.0057632127,0.022361891,0.03281838,0.104262516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010644306,0.0001396955,0.3506228,0.00059885933,0.000022247796,0.0017088786,0.4861573,0.0001789823,0.0005820982,0.0014805014,0.15847237,0.000025618097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040777516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12042327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040777516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086344325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009540892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08108032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914307283","doi":"10.1037/e610082009-001","title":"Applicability of the Level of Service Inventory to Minority Group Offenders in Ontario: Women and Aboriginal Offenders","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"PsycEXTRA Dataset","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Service (business); Criminology; Group (periodic table); Business; Marketing","score_opus":0.07581112337648768,"score_gpt":0.3481510114547355,"score_spread":0.2723398880782478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914307283","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036490022,0.000047105415,0.000033759243,0.00014750326,0.000014060081,0.000031273034,0.9952371,0.000048898943,0.00079124665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00674966,0.000104438084,0.00020035147,0.000043967957,0.000008873224,0.00017633368,0.9899805,0.000028373448,0.0027074793],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991763,0.000074419484,0.000100978425,0.00015400883,0.00030330807,0.00019095006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950541,0.0005776072,0.0006607411,0.0005960706,0.0025311336,0.00058032654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001113603,0.00082913914,0.0007691709,0.0034375372,0.0013077715,0.0014368519,0.0024688882,0.0010630296,0.013669804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007705091,0.0005694881,0.001056858,0.0069852225,0.00038368607,0.0005773239,0.0016408828,0.0010948923,0.007132844],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019012624,0.000053447337,0.039998297,0.00054096413,0.000111440466,0.000082800994,0.00033857694,0.00060686114,0.00013708757,0.00054069335,0.9519619,0.0054378114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038294157,0.000027723663,0.43541098,0.0006349942,0.00015291265,0.000102644444,0.0014968453,0.0017117086,0.00055407156,0.00042056336,0.5590239,0.00008067781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9320822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9593602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067917824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012048289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017548645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13663554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917257282","doi":"","title":"Liberdade de Religião - Guarda do Sábado (Sabbath)","year":2018,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.029083009221670585,"score_gpt":0.3482533727593761,"score_spread":0.31917036353770556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917257282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0671493,0.029190887,0.0028066596,0.07017883,0.0030591704,0.00046638437,0.00841983,0.0001241346,0.81860477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7876945,0.01241222,0.005258708,0.013796946,0.0005831658,0.0007418623,0.0029007657,0.00007654629,0.1765353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988142,0.00042637548,0.00008006492,0.00011647555,0.00028596327,0.0002769112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843615,0.00043752277,0.0002719878,0.00019926381,0.00040781277,0.00024732252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026213499,0.00020537256,0.00020112628,0.0008371179,0.0025063273,0.0018734515,0.000461713,0.00091352157,0.012574121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054830797,0.00020012869,0.00012816966,0.001574562,0.0018565633,0.0011701549,0.0018903059,0.0017670813,0.0011122534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015583145,0.000047021294,0.026105683,0.0007060459,0.000024726052,0.00036727716,0.023825917,0.00009871254,0.00091710204,0.4197905,0.32001838,0.20794278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014483086,0.00004033009,0.06040942,0.0003475604,0.000010194964,0.000105522304,0.0039898898,0.00004254084,0.0002890863,0.008595339,0.9261422,0.000013441627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061903935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11700473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061903935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002133778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006110736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12308723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920429397","doi":"10.5539/res.v11n1p194","title":"Unveiling the Challenges in the Implementation of Article 13 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities on the Right to Access to Justice: A Case Study of Lesotho","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of European Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Pretoria","keywords":"Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Economic Justice; Political science; Human rights; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Law; Duty; Public administration","score_opus":0.17611014894435315,"score_gpt":0.4456469987185158,"score_spread":0.2695368497741627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920429397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97293705,0.00056027644,0.00057163154,0.0045666387,0.000028329256,0.00019574534,0.00002764505,0.0000036551633,0.02110904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944819,0.0009621045,0.00068940513,0.0006381473,0.000010024139,0.0001475677,0.000018202145,0.0000056581425,0.003046847],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922793,0.0056687132,0.00016394995,0.00021127274,0.0004978461,0.0011788693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938724,0.004254115,0.00070384913,0.00017598258,0.00061849743,0.00037517468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005677572,0.00042784653,0.00047783018,0.0012296588,0.015997509,0.0064534717,0.001760345,0.002762858,0.0019159183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008534436,0.00044077367,0.00030881466,0.0022527357,0.007835745,0.0038032364,0.004441473,0.0024335647,0.00020817645],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041952426,0.00020859175,0.014291343,0.00031659365,0.00000942711,0.02442213,0.9312313,0.00027205335,0.0012267675,0.015222409,0.0013680016,0.0113893915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004864048,0.000052248084,0.0047561717,0.00017273921,0.000008678533,0.00077225285,0.9838913,0.0001504599,0.00021078238,0.00054789527,0.00942013,0.000012508699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11365093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25468937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11365093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009814311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010961712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22597879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920971698","doi":"10.1515/ldr-2019-0017","title":"Application of Y.S. Lee’s General Theory of Law and Development to Botswana","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law and Development Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Resource curse; Dutch disease; Law and development; Natural resource; Diversification (marketing strategy); Development economics; Language change; Politics; Rule of law; Development theory; Economics; Political science; Curse; Development studies; Law; Sociology; Economic growth; Business","score_opus":0.026942358629925552,"score_gpt":0.3083007062933814,"score_spread":0.28135834766345585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920971698","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16171946,0.015426995,0.06472995,0.12148186,0.00088880927,0.0007263744,0.00024458976,0.000086572385,0.6346954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97408694,0.004055242,0.005848092,0.0038700018,0.00008089291,0.0002698712,0.000030546707,0.000008190559,0.011750222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991941,0.00043971703,0.00002939107,0.00009138302,0.000113161215,0.00013227036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982667,0.0012591671,0.00012211004,0.000064735315,0.00023674089,0.00005063216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018807639,0.00026379735,0.00023801577,0.0024066612,0.0018697823,0.002218946,0.0005477243,0.001345747,0.002556221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002474721,0.00019377697,0.00045051397,0.0023599884,0.008130313,0.0021313122,0.0019044816,0.001532498,0.00011339169],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004955598,0.000024353722,0.0013361593,0.00008365021,0.0000058914093,0.00045317234,0.0020245165,0.0013661534,0.0000778877,0.98333275,0.002855858,0.00843465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040479674,0.00008019464,0.0061753863,0.0006511302,0.00003051003,0.0004820253,0.007736815,0.0070182714,0.00040884776,0.8323995,0.14494532,0.000031488795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013206879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016347809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013206879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055883457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048740944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040546536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944152752","doi":"10.22215/etd/2017-12724","title":"Trade Unions and Noncitizens in South Africa: Towards an Organizational Norm of Differentiated Universalism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Xenophobia; Universalism; Norm (philosophy); Political science; Immigration; Embodied cognition; Racism; Cosmopolitanism; Working class; Ethnic group; Institution; Nationality; Sociology; Gender studies; Political economy; Law; Development economics","score_opus":0.023616993632970675,"score_gpt":0.30043629136954725,"score_spread":0.2768192977365766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944152752","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8685175,0.004558983,0.00048452587,0.020318342,0.00011322492,0.00005865831,0.000019065006,0.000005722552,0.10592388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99207896,0.0011070241,0.00014599644,0.00064489926,0.000013791992,0.00001933494,0.0000065495997,0.00000410617,0.0059792046],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981493,0.00079377124,0.000052771502,0.00013480739,0.00019358999,0.0006758025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828315,0.000850167,0.0002900066,0.00009849416,0.00015337142,0.0003248468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028568779,0.00017184186,0.0002027013,0.0009870478,0.011350247,0.0060396795,0.00064498413,0.0013573691,0.004673506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003906979,0.00021033965,0.000085423526,0.0021071115,0.012763669,0.0024777576,0.006287935,0.0022562032,0.00014704904],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000835459,0.00007946804,0.013032816,0.00024133206,0.000008105507,0.0011891645,0.6807662,0.00012093612,0.0019862617,0.27209887,0.0022727982,0.028120438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031360218,0.00005437444,0.046559248,0.00067247316,0.000013852573,0.0003547979,0.8121,0.00009686637,0.0006927943,0.02722189,0.112178236,0.000024182831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05669567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18057969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05669567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008063311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0166347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11273134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945074637","doi":"10.1080/00083968.2019.1598452","title":"The Janus face of legal pluralism for the rule of law promotion in sub-Saharan Africa","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Central European University","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Rule of law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Dialectic; Sociology; Legal realism; Comparative law; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04268643175071297,"score_gpt":0.2796468034743327,"score_spread":0.23696037172361972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945074637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5011917,0.020338384,0.023977453,0.13393623,0.00068143464,0.0001604933,0.000047162313,0.000057864494,0.31960934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994823,0.0011080157,0.0012779718,0.0009640815,0.000055135584,0.000020968559,0.0000031657246,0.0000060337406,0.0017416852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99501157,0.0030794663,0.00021659592,0.00034247417,0.0006012836,0.0007486508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995037,0.0030503625,0.0007356093,0.0003578061,0.0004238431,0.00039524742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008351248,0.00018133128,0.00028728106,0.0013139328,0.009180377,0.009553888,0.00078127853,0.0024365496,0.0019245698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00987549,0.00023420458,0.00018857366,0.0012308616,0.033025168,0.005267584,0.006109239,0.0039867098,0.00013076406],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005474786,0.000009231836,0.0007804599,0.000040380262,0.0000026374491,0.00050438906,0.033053152,0.00010338787,0.00019224375,0.9571844,0.0005635827,0.0075607873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018328123,0.00004873211,0.0052033663,0.0008672732,0.000016583206,0.0010443915,0.11264037,0.0006133631,0.0007862662,0.6668836,0.2118331,0.000044615794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008660489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011790265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009553888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006121757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009795159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044416666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945498499","doi":"","title":"Making Motherhood Work: Women?s Child Support Claims, Race, and the Remaking of Citizenship in South Africa, 1958-2015","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Deep Blue (University of Michigan)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies, University of Michigan; Department of Afroamerican and African Studies, University of Michigan; Wenner-Gren Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Citizenship; Gender studies; Race (biology); Work (physics); Sociology; Political science; Law; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.018030771241159312,"score_gpt":0.2600203560993727,"score_spread":0.24198958485821337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945498499","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9825699,0.0029990512,0.000056955996,0.005422225,0.0001013812,0.000017164688,0.000079609774,0.0000020283308,0.00875158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99466515,0.0022169256,0.000041444036,0.00027830247,0.000020967755,0.000021189135,0.000027651578,0.0000031925128,0.0027251325],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915314,0.00032356812,0.000043450404,0.00007059062,0.000106878455,0.0003023999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998814,0.0005118603,0.00029272342,0.000044657874,0.00011956881,0.00021727853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002472857,0.00024462992,0.00027483568,0.0012724972,0.0084795,0.0035609708,0.00059349823,0.0008341495,0.0028309652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056910557,0.00034286894,0.00014152251,0.001868568,0.0055595916,0.0031916862,0.0045349603,0.0021736254,0.00022014933],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013507002,0.000011647629,0.014909648,0.000048497455,0.0000026802143,0.0003200274,0.97421426,0.000010013897,0.000121837635,0.0030098504,0.00075368566,0.0065845177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013606864,0.000016137015,0.035069853,0.00020791865,0.000003319569,0.00011305829,0.9460088,0.0000091042675,0.0000803342,0.00028114574,0.018203327,0.0000056580975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07040307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1440787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07040307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052092667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041021924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13998657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946896408","doi":"","title":"MAKING THE CHOICE BETWEEN MERGER AND CONCURRENCY RULES IN TORT: A COMMENT ON YOUNG V. BELLA","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"BELLA; Supreme court; Tort; Law; Action (physics); Political science; Position (finance); Cause of action; Liability; Business","score_opus":0.06253256117679147,"score_gpt":0.3556093057262634,"score_spread":0.29307674454947197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946896408","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032917995,0.016309116,0.0017453883,0.8760047,0.0030453848,0.00012930874,0.00032821437,0.00006279549,0.069457114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2912378,0.008156019,0.0016245601,0.6573599,0.004655153,0.00014174712,0.00007283912,0.00012595774,0.036626022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98798466,0.002007331,0.0007020808,0.0016715064,0.003498758,0.004135671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9676051,0.024087522,0.0014531228,0.0003696392,0.004519483,0.001965164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018432308,0.00063362764,0.0011727482,0.001725442,0.03208308,0.015946425,0.005081129,0.052972794,0.0037221895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03179661,0.0018253217,0.0013788857,0.003452754,0.02113424,0.0070293704,0.003818448,0.034470577,0.0006880813],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001450271,0.000034636465,0.0026065013,0.00026845705,0.00004474088,0.002757235,0.04089659,0.00047872297,0.0013955968,0.6923652,0.24885546,0.010151721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015001438,0.000118883065,0.008184131,0.0013928488,0.00023665844,0.00091478205,0.025671277,0.000918372,0.002339168,0.06393623,0.8955924,0.0005452301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8581939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91309863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8581939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04748342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07686104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34451795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947891039","doi":"10.7202/1059342ar","title":"LEGISLATION DEROGATING FROM THE QUEBEC CIVIL CODE","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Legislation; Law; Scope (computer science); Charter; Civil code; Political science; Compensation (psychology); Code (set theory); Civil law (Civil law); Statute of limitations; Business; Commercial law; Computer science; Programming language; Psychology","score_opus":0.017030052240038472,"score_gpt":0.2679905076278339,"score_spread":0.25096045538779543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947891039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037400458,0.006209668,0.0031509183,0.052832235,0.0030073642,0.00027594846,0.0017137921,0.0003931388,0.8950164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3525755,0.0048186453,0.0042861495,0.04542169,0.00048639489,0.00031536986,0.00094685744,0.00013887361,0.5910105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995024,0.00071155815,0.00015577955,0.0004106341,0.0026112534,0.0010867375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99367046,0.0021195055,0.0003079323,0.00034038498,0.0030672038,0.00049450423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023121885,0.0004871157,0.00026662604,0.0020687783,0.0074179485,0.0045329286,0.0011787136,0.004225225,0.019474583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010246629,0.0003610367,0.0005340997,0.001994946,0.0025205044,0.0012963415,0.0012088392,0.0035132992,0.0015315091],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050776107,0.000060165083,0.0042695957,0.00015435154,0.000026799036,0.0006020896,0.004384448,0.000812035,0.0015935473,0.5988186,0.3350451,0.05418244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018010844,0.00001785816,0.007938713,0.00019073045,0.000013801625,0.000079975434,0.00062373717,0.0004399008,0.0004883069,0.0024804468,0.98767054,0.000037825812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9679207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9805094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048676502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048676502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07459257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35317445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948174746","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340017","title":"‘Lawfare’ in South Africa and Its Effects on the Judiciary","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Presidency; Politics; Democracy; Rule of law; Political science; State (computer science); Jurisprudence; Sociology","score_opus":0.06124879699420717,"score_gpt":0.3468832610474058,"score_spread":0.28563446405319864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948174746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89893734,0.0043664356,0.00033165974,0.019132763,0.00006738355,0.000025132493,0.000040746898,0.0000057710868,0.077092715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984333,0.0005184498,0.00004296144,0.00028146754,0.000019577035,0.000005778875,0.000003045506,0.0000013866166,0.00069407583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966133,0.0016773487,0.0001123228,0.0001680692,0.00035172302,0.0010773332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99080896,0.004334643,0.0030371924,0.00017416685,0.0005279646,0.0011170474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002409001,0.00018252962,0.00026589542,0.0016168562,0.007067351,0.0046119685,0.00067872,0.0013755673,0.010235029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069925324,0.00025293924,0.00019500547,0.0022557664,0.009838473,0.0019939514,0.0045606988,0.0023461215,0.00027361573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023749004,0.00037515225,0.10517846,0.0007650606,0.000093452494,0.008444373,0.25765145,0.0013723645,0.004960106,0.570371,0.0065925405,0.0439586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007143801,0.00028070068,0.5592442,0.0015294775,0.000070767994,0.0014620065,0.23145173,0.0007987486,0.0017113611,0.05746897,0.14581402,0.00009662005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038165633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.067087725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038165633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010659147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059244577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07733786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949433261","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340027","title":"Private Prosecutions in Kenya","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kenya; Law; Legislation; Conflict of laws; Political science; Constitution; Criminal code; Statutory law; Private rights; Criminal law","score_opus":0.04397163548767583,"score_gpt":0.3736450141364982,"score_spread":0.32967337864882235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949433261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72317255,0.022322383,0.0017984919,0.07477374,0.0009736227,0.00020237316,0.00024087339,0.000045820965,0.1764701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97816646,0.004751393,0.0004411136,0.0031697515,0.00013017631,0.000045132547,0.0000453789,0.000011492177,0.013239134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961201,0.0018376132,0.00023194388,0.00021646223,0.0005731219,0.0010208606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824432,0.007129616,0.004956359,0.0006130553,0.0018647449,0.002993082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00318069,0.00016008387,0.00021900206,0.0014481167,0.009426774,0.0030522544,0.00073194824,0.0024367662,0.008915537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011257775,0.0003522117,0.00015016079,0.0010919907,0.004598866,0.0020847337,0.0037127924,0.0029818008,0.00049374497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002848003,0.00041238702,0.11411008,0.0013054158,0.0000642995,0.027027119,0.13016194,0.0008345263,0.0040797666,0.41140306,0.10476645,0.20555022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012438113,0.00039662197,0.16697603,0.0034885716,0.00005066626,0.012674964,0.1087018,0.0010599887,0.0018958417,0.020478914,0.6840204,0.00013179028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024523137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06264291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024523137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036621355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0094657205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04876077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950248336","doi":"","title":"Canada Water Kerk (Londenbediening)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Die Kerkblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Maar; Theology; Philosophy; Geology","score_opus":0.03358951895615178,"score_gpt":0.29075051444662553,"score_spread":0.2571609954904738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950248336","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010023733,0.011363664,0.0007063178,0.024159579,0.0017835397,0.00014103309,0.006188548,0.00041144024,0.9452222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0125621,0.0021692095,0.00043529598,0.0014195708,0.000037561378,0.00001356913,0.0005522589,0.000100824764,0.9827095],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995894,0.000018145704,0.000010932519,0.000059775233,0.00022072728,0.0001010117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941206,0.000044533335,0.000018948067,0.00003194644,0.00032497357,0.0001675129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031510115,0.00031540924,0.00023841394,0.0005725851,0.0056474037,0.0034150342,0.0006761096,0.002003176,0.26987317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009852144,0.00026295136,0.00020535318,0.0011947762,0.00093884394,0.0011977985,0.001589234,0.0014912878,0.027863776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072327384,0.000032643937,0.0022727698,0.0002705471,0.000009740154,0.0010947841,0.0016654601,0.0001388023,0.0019349019,0.031199856,0.8589992,0.102309026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018891725,0.0000031060306,0.0013608745,0.000039057515,0.0000010493932,0.00004553015,0.00039633783,0.000023766745,0.00021664884,0.0003239308,0.99758184,0.0000059739073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8407305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95573354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8407305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010676392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022332618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9028157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951447645","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199482139.003.0016","title":"Three Models of Affirmative Action through the Lens of Separation of Powers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Political science; Action (physics); Perspective (graphical); Identification (biology); Set (abstract data type); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.08699701251397882,"score_gpt":0.30324818611989984,"score_spread":0.21625117360592103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951447645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010232392,0.005500969,0.03129003,0.02335708,0.00038799408,0.000093233466,0.00004252279,0.000044125463,0.92905176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82384056,0.007103425,0.022821717,0.004322467,0.00030725257,0.0003830291,0.00005701984,0.00006316091,0.1411013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99703836,0.0015855381,0.00004758933,0.00022007035,0.00064871146,0.00045974372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854434,0.00082322996,0.00013546347,0.00018359172,0.00015968137,0.00015371823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034781136,0.0006664066,0.00035025674,0.0018942152,0.005857775,0.01043388,0.0019678448,0.0027010222,0.005548433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032600856,0.00026923956,0.0006603404,0.0018349148,0.035443366,0.005776921,0.0028182075,0.004984601,0.00066594064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.3795596e-7,0.0000016166745,0.000010506171,0.0000035093738,3.0146003e-7,0.00000496929,0.0006688767,0.000050631006,0.000006525776,0.9984896,0.00027939945,0.00048323456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075124476,0.000008633532,0.00013273848,0.00009637049,0.0000041948947,0.000037282334,0.0025871457,0.0005429032,0.00011518395,0.91324896,0.08321032,0.000008824703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026968373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021854559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026968373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015266104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011028326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11076385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952361554","doi":"10.18778/1733-8077.15.1.03","title":"The Trials and Tribulations of Zimbabwean Precarious Women Workers in Johannesburg: A Cry for Help?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Sociology Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Scholarship; Human rights; Gender studies; Sociology; Migrant workers; Face (sociological concept); Documentation; Political science; Work (physics); Criminology; Economic growth; Law; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.12462550554707856,"score_gpt":0.5079537008259466,"score_spread":0.383328195278868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952361554","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09313803,0.78487486,0.0002468591,0.10371676,0.0014514008,0.0002704129,0.0001359357,0.0000077204,0.016157998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49850518,0.4784157,0.00068101933,0.014808995,0.0004200132,0.0004309882,0.00012415039,0.000017814507,0.0065961694],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99537,0.0028902523,0.00038568367,0.0001526109,0.00050636526,0.000695188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99317,0.004189488,0.0013295932,0.00023898362,0.00062264025,0.0004492935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007302872,0.00025562642,0.0006373768,0.0020153096,0.005054938,0.0046804072,0.0016777266,0.002169895,0.004548052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02701617,0.00047462774,0.00030682026,0.0028843938,0.005882744,0.0052147205,0.0037066645,0.002732948,0.00031903808],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015117989,0.00009076406,0.009162073,0.024155058,0.0001620311,0.0042558657,0.48851928,0.00011769726,0.0015222568,0.052894063,0.029490255,0.38947955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006981466,0.0001450936,0.029905453,0.043499224,0.00015555468,0.0013656983,0.4741681,0.00003192123,0.00047652324,0.005804118,0.44434234,0.000036134705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05106745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11182088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05106745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006080507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016674716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10154039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952494044","doi":"","title":"Expanding the Constitutional Right to State-Funded Legal Counsel to Address the British Columbia Housing Crisis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eviction; Law; Charter; Political science; Constitutional right; State (computer science); Right to counsel; Supreme court; Public administration; Economic Justice; Fair Housing Act; Civil rights","score_opus":0.022337275482845313,"score_gpt":0.3297768709251076,"score_spread":0.3074395954422623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952494044","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028031372,0.3692771,0.0014637533,0.23760523,0.0017672172,0.00019691496,0.00017874697,0.00008274455,0.3613969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4660111,0.37652823,0.0034743256,0.09151552,0.0011409112,0.00023637571,0.00016501322,0.000052957763,0.060875636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957782,0.0008179669,0.0001772884,0.00033715085,0.0015180154,0.0013713464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99197817,0.003630403,0.00039224603,0.0002727699,0.002952229,0.00077426183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006040017,0.00029198182,0.00042709737,0.005488621,0.009995651,0.008263735,0.0024728538,0.0072302814,0.0049028364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011861697,0.0005054852,0.000321988,0.0048215347,0.016422624,0.0033104082,0.0027098402,0.0071151876,0.0005964413],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017083203,0.000104187726,0.0018450536,0.0013809104,0.000014744937,0.00086308667,0.01131914,0.0007600264,0.00064154266,0.7028745,0.091262795,0.18891697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022976874,0.000027136704,0.0077926493,0.005380088,0.000033492295,0.00020440119,0.005995194,0.0002942005,0.00032355558,0.02010435,0.95975685,0.000065116634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89713204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9469628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10286796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060037248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15322459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43560278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964424237","doi":"10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.39","title":"Citizens’ E-Participation at Local Municipal Government in South Africa","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Reviews on Global Economics","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Local government; Government (linguistics); Economic growth; Business; Public administration; Political science; Development economics; Economics","score_opus":0.03646462897086611,"score_gpt":0.31786417983780246,"score_spread":0.28139955086693635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964424237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9492335,0.0021104275,0.0002200598,0.004781446,0.000018804545,0.000062485575,0.000056868972,0.000009219639,0.043507237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99567115,0.0009821851,0.00009066275,0.00011736403,0.000003901523,0.000019877823,0.000015094557,0.0000020928146,0.0030976883],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845374,0.0009642006,0.000042704443,0.000061998464,0.00012820102,0.00034907664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982004,0.0009966065,0.00030617634,0.000056867924,0.00015245288,0.0002875169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018499804,0.00011511368,0.00017784804,0.0007043684,0.0045267018,0.003201867,0.00044503788,0.0007306193,0.007028605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003839672,0.00015655156,0.0001513457,0.002181537,0.0024436065,0.002259342,0.002797074,0.0006698112,0.0003870728],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025870136,0.00043824676,0.08154552,0.0020256808,0.000039290084,0.0062654447,0.685965,0.0010161052,0.0018512284,0.064867,0.00884474,0.14688298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024193429,0.00016073573,0.11878332,0.001259403,0.000033395336,0.00063060835,0.7826587,0.00051004847,0.0006052841,0.0030750637,0.09223087,0.000028324477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042432718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08427197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042432718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046934467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005009469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08437151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964660712","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-05-27","title":"Institutions protecting constitutional democracy: Some conceptual and methodological preliminaries","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Democracy; Legislature; Statutory law; Political science; Separation of powers; Law; Government (linguistics); Executive branch; Constitutional law; Relation (database); Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07140572652467007,"score_gpt":0.3218985388752062,"score_spread":0.2504928123505361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964660712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0305853,0.07849406,0.30535424,0.17981939,0.0028309706,0.0011598701,0.002321461,0.00019523925,0.39923945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61717045,0.079292074,0.22137669,0.025710491,0.007216151,0.0074206297,0.0016437357,0.00023108712,0.03993875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952709,0.002931491,0.00036542816,0.00045141618,0.0005807525,0.00039994478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99116486,0.0065534734,0.0010299236,0.00050274713,0.0005230022,0.00022594641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008027825,0.0011557307,0.0010117794,0.0075846603,0.005617833,0.009876297,0.0032628991,0.0065603172,0.008881478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008296509,0.0010715128,0.001317109,0.009731972,0.02869102,0.010312854,0.006040071,0.011220533,0.0018963955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.55777e-7,0.000007967927,0.000054963537,0.000026262893,9.140523e-7,0.000021750788,0.0004651435,0.0000829151,0.000021432777,0.99840516,0.00040441396,0.00050820096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000918724,0.000022091186,0.00036935526,0.00034003195,0.0000060531925,0.00013007133,0.0016760073,0.0007339145,0.00017236239,0.8868684,0.109653264,0.000019184336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006147061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004857141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009876297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007933722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004824133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057563424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965274425","doi":"10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.50","title":"Local Government Reform in South Africa: The Quest for Review and Repositioning of Municipal Administration","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Reviews on Global Economics","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public administration; Government (linguistics); Local government; Democracy; Politics; Audit; State (computer science); Corporate governance; Development plan; Accountability; Relevance (law); Political science; Business; Finance; Accounting; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.029361215144516988,"score_gpt":0.321520357490562,"score_spread":0.292159142346045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965274425","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030767841,0.70412195,0.0020139944,0.23304586,0.0021933392,0.0003542666,0.0000994768,0.00005950719,0.02734376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5538457,0.41247845,0.0057823122,0.0193847,0.0011180767,0.00046883433,0.00009553535,0.0000521576,0.0067741647],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9730997,0.017931273,0.002416074,0.00080681214,0.0037693242,0.0019767962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9343898,0.039480377,0.007788166,0.0034886335,0.012934938,0.0019180818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045964044,0.00040752804,0.0012184004,0.006919024,0.003996835,0.015191639,0.0019518816,0.0033214064,0.0020371461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.087528035,0.00048069548,0.0005535769,0.011152323,0.013247889,0.011169539,0.005195696,0.0037829159,0.00029151677],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008362083,0.00013279384,0.0034408101,0.02632043,0.00014860522,0.0014819134,0.096288435,0.0014997192,0.0016249734,0.37820083,0.04891297,0.4418649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046458554,0.00012316005,0.006087789,0.0336503,0.00017868553,0.00044113255,0.06325755,0.0003605164,0.0011793841,0.02023568,0.87437403,0.00006538723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029362554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03646265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045964044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02450852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10611774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24308401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966063952","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190653330.013.33","title":"Foreign Relations Law in the Constitutions and Courts of Commonwealth African Countries","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.028321213844853897,"score_gpt":0.247206760510738,"score_spread":0.2188855466658841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966063952","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.160988,0.027886348,0.0009710854,0.016262617,0.00022817332,0.00006594381,0.0000621652,0.000015166483,0.79352045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722216,0.0055314903,0.00036996327,0.0007054156,0.000041707626,0.000032932807,0.000018075867,0.000007824645,0.02107109],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980964,0.00110506,0.00006329733,0.00010336578,0.00030395875,0.00032787386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765587,0.0018188059,0.00018072414,0.00008245425,0.00015068449,0.0001113323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022005036,0.00014158365,0.00019037882,0.0020361303,0.0052850805,0.0064749764,0.000320473,0.0008873326,0.005596672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047628516,0.00016560018,0.00009236651,0.003321184,0.010938272,0.0027853956,0.0024189213,0.0020124891,0.00016787877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029189941,0.0000059392023,0.0003989037,0.000033007924,0.0000013317273,0.00019243907,0.024027057,0.000086876425,0.00011026622,0.9675625,0.001839124,0.005739688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019516017,0.000033952376,0.010171973,0.0015231245,0.000013993086,0.0004692925,0.09108746,0.00035899953,0.00053985213,0.15434243,0.7414065,0.000033015123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015674643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023199081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015674643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070559466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051194787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966748507","doi":"10.29173/cais980","title":"Metaphors, for dealing with data in the workplace","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Information science; Library science; Humanities; Psychology; Ethnology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.056665501450579546,"score_gpt":0.32386461452620663,"score_spread":0.2671991130756271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966748507","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051558986,0.063886665,0.33859748,0.21529514,0.013686719,0.00064926746,0.001601994,0.0006821447,0.31404158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74706614,0.018023128,0.16737399,0.027305419,0.002336361,0.0017404152,0.0008586099,0.00052997953,0.034765966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97441113,0.019742226,0.0010846372,0.0013213309,0.002657175,0.0007835251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97928065,0.014623173,0.0014521473,0.002052019,0.0016924734,0.0008995836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015566986,0.0017451522,0.00081522967,0.0060077375,0.009208483,0.013482653,0.0021771465,0.0056408704,0.007183354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029790618,0.0007124582,0.0014372255,0.006915549,0.038782697,0.024847146,0.011142463,0.008105924,0.0015177289],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033027758,0.00001600326,0.0005679568,0.00042510746,0.000014423393,0.00034788167,0.16739067,0.00010700421,0.0005184139,0.7992815,0.017618673,0.013679341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020484284,0.0000340832,0.00054146943,0.0010466556,0.00001431888,0.0013252995,0.09845452,0.00045654253,0.00027622943,0.23127005,0.6665008,0.000059534406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051772785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048764264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015566986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065193456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004425526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08232707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969393105","doi":"10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.38","title":"The Influence of Legislation and Regulation on Strategy in Public Entities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Reviews on Global Economics","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Business; Law and economics; Public economics; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.031077486922164794,"score_gpt":0.3115971274325305,"score_spread":0.2805196405103657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969393105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18971387,0.018172527,0.02195821,0.035709884,0.00030726797,0.00024739638,0.000050108814,0.00004337011,0.7337973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99027187,0.003533262,0.0016160138,0.0011870324,0.000045384575,0.00009994882,0.000009649728,0.000011958104,0.0032248432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97908235,0.014143251,0.0008454265,0.0009785729,0.0032179637,0.0017325649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9598938,0.031735294,0.0049828603,0.0009840359,0.001920375,0.00048367048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016335553,0.00030864542,0.00033424704,0.0024830867,0.0036171558,0.011575252,0.0007729716,0.00284253,0.0020300567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023365343,0.00030978688,0.00037944384,0.0028285002,0.034182664,0.0068020467,0.003511482,0.002674481,0.00018120477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006858514,0.000017837456,0.0012794149,0.00012119779,0.000006671685,0.0002037965,0.013022077,0.0003931931,0.00017632442,0.9753166,0.0003020247,0.009154171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004171857,0.00026488112,0.036703624,0.0048926966,0.00009003729,0.0008107414,0.07472413,0.0022399232,0.0032605724,0.5151743,0.36167282,0.00012462563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010310782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010775394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016335553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0113371825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0152927125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08639169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974595825","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a4221","title":"Director's Duty to Act for a Proper Purpose in the Context of Distribution under the Companies Act 71 of 2008","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Goddard Space Flight Center; Nedbank","keywords":"Duty; Statute; Statutory law; Statutory interpretation; Companies Act; Law; Context (archaeology); Common law; Interpretation (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Face (sociological concept); Statute of limitations; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Corporate law; Economics; Sociology; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.015442356436548343,"score_gpt":0.2963009868218156,"score_spread":0.28085863038526726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974595825","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14191933,0.003922171,0.0048586586,0.05682551,0.0010546197,0.00011861981,0.0001467196,0.000047669782,0.7911067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8703369,0.0028082584,0.002728788,0.018632447,0.000840792,0.00019716675,0.000104745835,0.000044820412,0.10430609],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98196304,0.00804623,0.0009519839,0.0014490266,0.0045299553,0.0030596717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987887,0.0076137823,0.0015308068,0.00049822615,0.0019770744,0.0004931252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009981407,0.00033394288,0.00048377665,0.0011502244,0.0065642707,0.011601675,0.0010662671,0.005718362,0.0036535836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017490946,0.00044135135,0.00042841976,0.00096172176,0.011131656,0.006390585,0.003989259,0.0064087533,0.00089073455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021742691,0.000030480387,0.0016066226,0.000056396035,0.0000034380157,0.0004973955,0.016776754,0.0003077503,0.00036747436,0.95817155,0.017336182,0.0048241518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032959266,0.000117197946,0.011459022,0.00092645054,0.00004369705,0.0008499812,0.032176033,0.00094061915,0.0013418389,0.07443385,0.8775529,0.00012531127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031511415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04277909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031511415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0111766355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014744765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08109254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980138343","doi":"10.3390/land8100150","title":"Participatory Rural Appraisal Approaches for Public Participation in EIA: Lessons from South Africa","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; North-West University","keywords":"Public participation; Participatory rural appraisal; Citizen journalism; Environmental planning; Participatory development; Rural development; Participatory planning; Community participation; Geography; Environmental resource management; Political science; Business; Environmental protection; Socioeconomics; Public administration; Sociology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.18033780112979325,"score_gpt":0.38185208951391764,"score_spread":0.20151428838412438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980138343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62590504,0.01189525,0.06646921,0.0791085,0.0004484154,0.005360597,0.00010897574,0.00013054362,0.21057339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95482236,0.0051558656,0.032319956,0.0009873234,0.00007250816,0.0016170166,0.000019674015,0.00004029541,0.00496514],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96858585,0.028686993,0.00039508627,0.00032642478,0.00086723367,0.0011383558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9606259,0.034166805,0.001056706,0.0012102653,0.0018019163,0.0011383869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03188907,0.00073301484,0.00049142784,0.0016263307,0.0075682034,0.00566353,0.001334779,0.0012790852,0.0039864993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026505832,0.00043017,0.0004953397,0.002005677,0.007128894,0.0054757292,0.009535113,0.002772041,0.00045775465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017544487,0.00056821806,0.006098236,0.0024081985,0.000045965066,0.0025924114,0.6910435,0.0011458535,0.0019292044,0.046109833,0.0035395913,0.24434358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002031931,0.0008023999,0.020357298,0.0033621576,0.000047675934,0.0010043576,0.7802315,0.0018112026,0.0018317925,0.05811227,0.13214499,0.00009115984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004698263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0133597925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03188907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046535726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010763188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16864753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980704029","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v39i2.11355","title":"UNTANGLING THE REQUIREMENT OF GOOD FAITH IN THE DERIVATIVE ACTION IN COMPANY LAW (Part 1)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Foundation","keywords":"Faith; Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Statutory law; Fair dealing; Action (physics); Jurisprudence; Meaning (existential); Political science; Sociology; Good faith; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.08262122442472057,"score_gpt":0.3696140038897634,"score_spread":0.2869927794650428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980704029","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13457683,0.014691986,0.019565616,0.08542519,0.0010228893,0.00019779334,0.00006147182,0.000042928696,0.7444153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9671642,0.0023552019,0.0025470979,0.009110542,0.00036031462,0.00008107744,0.000009275078,0.000017905619,0.018354427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924077,0.0030858673,0.00042531898,0.0008226986,0.0019479201,0.0013105021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839982,0.013098121,0.0009532375,0.00069259485,0.0010048386,0.00025316761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008287768,0.0003446767,0.00049834204,0.0013640424,0.0069406824,0.011089319,0.0012741581,0.009396407,0.0031174542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014064176,0.0005487765,0.0006651674,0.00079697446,0.0462451,0.008182614,0.0039602476,0.0100926785,0.00041993184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032306098,0.0000056182403,0.00010675094,0.000025604419,0.0000017667369,0.00014587131,0.0031025615,0.000056351622,0.00014376474,0.99445724,0.0006412048,0.0013101832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003229917,0.00014431732,0.0036207833,0.00088763784,0.0000405522,0.0007354542,0.012381579,0.0009954686,0.0032331115,0.8334131,0.14443775,0.00007789569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012791096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013838528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012791096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007259973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074480446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05267507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980919765","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a5950","title":"Deciphering Dangerousness: A Critical Analysis of Section 286A and B of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Declaration; Discretion; Law; Statutory law; Political science; Legislature; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.00906949135286845,"score_gpt":0.29022582411866865,"score_spread":0.2811563327658002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980919765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22593632,0.0702482,0.011121744,0.2788647,0.0034966809,0.0015480807,0.0005622774,0.00009850213,0.40812337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8778622,0.02703051,0.0065036155,0.04927912,0.0012701666,0.00044580473,0.0002333454,0.00009126284,0.037283983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98926544,0.0044894447,0.0005936389,0.00039416488,0.0037345607,0.0015226722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94601315,0.045418832,0.0018808781,0.00041452606,0.0057580476,0.0005146806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013566533,0.00046127112,0.00038483687,0.009915696,0.011788286,0.009029362,0.0013167929,0.0057641505,0.002139968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037911788,0.00049555604,0.000606928,0.003712507,0.017377693,0.005426632,0.0025929,0.008701635,0.00030410953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006138836,0.00004614974,0.006372179,0.0005647199,0.000021988135,0.0031138097,0.20731252,0.00035177363,0.0006722126,0.6464893,0.071050234,0.063943714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017146795,0.000110480694,0.038587485,0.006560795,0.00009500471,0.0012306754,0.3170334,0.001005861,0.002010641,0.1071901,0.52597106,0.00018735132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17158979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2785004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17158979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025063878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032116793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34118205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981107737","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v39i3.11326","title":"UNTANGLING THE REQUIREMENT OF GOOD FAITH IN THE DERIVATIVE ACTION IN COMPANY LAW (Part 2)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Law; Appeal; Supreme court; Fair dealing; Statutory law; Action (physics); Jurisprudence; Meaning (existential); Political science; Sociology; Good faith; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.08242535669262861,"score_gpt":0.369411996836841,"score_spread":0.2869866401442124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981107737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14889592,0.013494343,0.028296165,0.10459526,0.00151463,0.00025748857,0.000091695445,0.00006243599,0.70279205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9580631,0.0018350137,0.0036511272,0.013181365,0.0004959127,0.00010425235,0.000012931137,0.000022152828,0.02263417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916693,0.003309794,0.00046025706,0.00096941664,0.0021553936,0.0014357906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9800283,0.016817806,0.00096626196,0.0007921103,0.0011238805,0.00027158254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009109022,0.00032860183,0.0005526514,0.0013807103,0.0054821777,0.011646807,0.0014081991,0.010158945,0.00324632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015815282,0.0005716373,0.00084740546,0.0006873895,0.035655882,0.008638737,0.0035885507,0.009421877,0.00045472383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050780054,0.000007067439,0.0001468674,0.000030022884,0.0000024572118,0.00020043134,0.003488335,0.00008218746,0.00018656366,0.99310476,0.0010015123,0.0017447198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039246057,0.00016479679,0.00439093,0.0010369392,0.00004463268,0.0009185781,0.011064335,0.0014355523,0.0039746547,0.79926634,0.17756455,0.00009943007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009319495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009960004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011646807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006172598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006340838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048173666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981705201","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190083472.003.0003","title":"Ethical and Legal Issues in Mandatory Reporting","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Political science; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.04175626881034083,"score_gpt":0.36278310002432557,"score_spread":0.32102683121398473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981705201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053477944,0.030934945,0.010081771,0.11959532,0.004762934,0.00015521844,0.000079753896,0.00012651682,0.8289157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14803264,0.026432538,0.013690532,0.038596027,0.0021933655,0.00035087857,0.00013886327,0.00021709494,0.7703482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99106455,0.00513302,0.00034605863,0.00034361423,0.002702529,0.00041025798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836594,0.012850703,0.0005124466,0.00066788745,0.002072106,0.00023745114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010403203,0.000308606,0.00025017507,0.0007529972,0.005267479,0.0067712194,0.001082477,0.0032567778,0.008000787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01603685,0.00033486102,0.00024466935,0.0011246861,0.0086566955,0.004489533,0.0026526293,0.0065918514,0.0019447069],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004531333,0.000016424217,0.00013546555,0.00017721618,0.000001347863,0.00028559988,0.01740137,0.00013701312,0.00018093684,0.7996274,0.13809283,0.04393998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014197267,0.000008010711,0.00024685214,0.0012536444,0.0000018174693,0.00032980437,0.004346255,0.00015470567,0.00032249535,0.05382992,0.93949354,0.00001168861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013359636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019755635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013359636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005240216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01029754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055018067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990248207","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v12n4p8","title":"Do the Queensland Regulations Governing the Refund of Motor Vehicle Registration Fees Breach s 92 of the Commonwealth Constitution?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Constitution; Protectionism; Law; Denial; Extraterritoriality; State (computer science); Business; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; International trade; Jurisdiction","score_opus":0.020090675629249082,"score_gpt":0.3072781416663553,"score_spread":0.2871874660371062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990248207","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27572164,0.0023278345,0.0047845896,0.2152483,0.0011643975,0.00020104319,0.00020361594,0.0000884146,0.5002601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86028594,0.0013790397,0.0019746572,0.07495783,0.00036157295,0.000180668,0.000038014223,0.000034873436,0.06078742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912764,0.002489981,0.00030998763,0.000821111,0.002411388,0.0026912435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927267,0.0032413176,0.0020127352,0.00048194246,0.0011663425,0.00037085786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077979527,0.00014526614,0.00035589043,0.0008053738,0.0045729307,0.006077208,0.0011010991,0.006497722,0.00550043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021594094,0.000630756,0.00040051312,0.0013315153,0.013682108,0.004086581,0.002033639,0.005625705,0.0009791572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020573376,0.000047138397,0.004505866,0.00007465455,0.000014229806,0.00044568893,0.018799366,0.0001698118,0.0009582754,0.9491883,0.01665656,0.009119556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011286002,0.00021916952,0.07919715,0.000980679,0.000073483265,0.00058984826,0.024174893,0.0012851394,0.0016935243,0.19182001,0.6996034,0.00024977664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17288756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17856146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17288756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008906445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019053679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34376252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990939872","doi":"","title":"Kontrakbreuk en nie-vermoënskade : geld die gesegde \"belofte maak skuld\" nie vir gekwetste gevoelens en psigiese besering nie?","year":2011,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Journal of South African Law / Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Law; Feeling; Injustice; Scrutiny; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.029813549807218818,"score_gpt":0.27268135950774386,"score_spread":0.24286780970052504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990939872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13229033,0.042015105,0.0030785582,0.3858292,0.0049536685,0.000060278926,0.00009442577,0.00005073521,0.4316277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8390901,0.012273793,0.000869069,0.023404416,0.00061275106,0.000036422847,0.000042606265,0.000047606343,0.12362313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874383,0.0005905868,0.000042757852,0.00011673222,0.0002245725,0.0002816335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927026,0.00029341373,0.00011101682,0.000039403138,0.00010025269,0.00018558215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015050003,0.00023372944,0.0001897639,0.00037074622,0.0053489204,0.006640587,0.0005491103,0.0043928847,0.006920761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00429656,0.00018955089,0.00015145022,0.00030978303,0.011068615,0.005567126,0.003436513,0.0047205687,0.0008174057],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043228185,0.00004093297,0.002040782,0.00013668639,0.0000066795114,0.0013770065,0.08019575,0.000054298533,0.00064492266,0.8449105,0.04586282,0.024686448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016199918,0.000045753244,0.006316935,0.0007899717,0.000012754153,0.0013011699,0.13384207,0.00025394472,0.00078655616,0.09739425,0.75920004,0.000040282364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020517504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041402325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020517504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038948967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004399971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04079616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991900837","doi":"10.3138/utlj.69.s1.006","title":"The right-remedy gap in economic and social rights adjudication: Holism versus separability","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Dignity; Holism; Social rights; Fundamental rights; Right to health; Political science; Law and economics; Empowerment; Human rights; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.014228895770455503,"score_gpt":0.26792245688190774,"score_spread":0.25369356111145225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991900837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1018535,0.012089296,0.23577307,0.2752499,0.0014742835,0.00030075223,0.00020116493,0.00013359704,0.37292442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96909404,0.0011606419,0.016186228,0.007443727,0.0006460265,0.0002336689,0.000030087049,0.0000528911,0.005152639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.958099,0.024868738,0.0022335378,0.0038015035,0.0075760097,0.0034211068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96036935,0.029695392,0.0024612804,0.004167719,0.0022780388,0.0010282384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044020496,0.00049484,0.0012995327,0.0027665866,0.00973285,0.014414749,0.002304291,0.008432799,0.002625973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04439209,0.0006418227,0.0011992925,0.0019202087,0.110681854,0.02331053,0.010722525,0.015830837,0.00028785132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033017147,0.0000028527995,0.00005176087,0.000008918321,0.0000018572395,0.000014398142,0.0010252974,0.00005393794,0.000026731079,0.99794453,0.0001742211,0.00069215166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020508034,0.000012607696,0.00020364893,0.00012261268,0.0000075253693,0.000038306596,0.0014540321,0.0004206589,0.00015380028,0.9875668,0.009983173,0.000016451313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009530125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007471035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044020496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012889591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016038243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23280537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992588057","doi":"","title":"Scope of the Promotion of Access to Information Act 2 of 2000 : a comparative perspective","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of information; Scope (computer science); Legislation; Constitution; Promotion (chess); Government (linguistics); Law; Information access; Public access; Perspective (graphical); Access to information; Political science; Directive; Public administration; Public relations; Business; Computer science; Politics; Library science","score_opus":0.04887231065456085,"score_gpt":0.3752751095676394,"score_spread":0.32640279891307855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992588057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038612336,0.02307909,0.0029825252,0.017175827,0.00018463715,0.00006320168,0.000114942464,0.000007708203,0.91777974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9511586,0.025502741,0.001415898,0.0029991602,0.00034431185,0.00023902839,0.000113254006,0.000028645642,0.018198421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98946196,0.0059094736,0.0003116336,0.000443134,0.0023324513,0.00154144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98836654,0.008757314,0.0010241119,0.00039962263,0.001013389,0.00043897534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01030691,0.00035547183,0.00050414726,0.009471919,0.0060031884,0.014712595,0.0012441605,0.003904621,0.006914485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014518853,0.00041333542,0.0004925038,0.009927027,0.025356047,0.012128017,0.0073132245,0.0039170072,0.0005083173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008431541,0.000009140157,0.00022708318,0.00006348079,0.0000017932348,0.000101907535,0.009879426,0.000063757085,0.00007976662,0.9854187,0.0006307346,0.00351579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040056995,0.00010776039,0.013181615,0.0041998816,0.000036010868,0.00063746783,0.1016473,0.00044937822,0.00078812765,0.41647816,0.46238133,0.00005301505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017808734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017233528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017808734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013064974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010862549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09479344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993749956","doi":"","title":"South Africa's Wedding Jitters: Consolidation, Abolition, or Proliferation?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consolidation (business); Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.028741838777739132,"score_gpt":0.308755391149123,"score_spread":0.28001355237138387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993749956","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38701054,0.011888339,0.0021491153,0.11818421,0.0011461882,0.0000915325,0.0001873163,0.000041293933,0.47930142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97494024,0.0023585688,0.00025266228,0.005182005,0.0003212904,0.00004207377,0.00003925628,0.000020776484,0.016843077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979145,0.00060796906,0.00011676673,0.00021235872,0.0003416343,0.0008067292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966409,0.001402228,0.0008436648,0.0003547767,0.0002682045,0.00049020717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034033014,0.00021121348,0.00031290358,0.001343502,0.00908426,0.0073745777,0.0010256848,0.0021787828,0.008163767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015642004,0.0003676218,0.00019779154,0.002910375,0.014333695,0.006671437,0.004497199,0.0048065376,0.00056936766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006935439,0.00002971065,0.0061660376,0.000087922686,0.000007718348,0.00049104245,0.06229982,0.000069987866,0.0005481283,0.86283,0.014655682,0.0527446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052168405,0.00006935481,0.043395072,0.0014918986,0.000038292274,0.00072064344,0.17187855,0.00027507718,0.001188109,0.1395846,0.64125115,0.00005514718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034926675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059187826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034926675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053085177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060092984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0694468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994834569","doi":"10.1093/acrefore/9780190277734.013.763","title":"The Legal and Political Framework for Archaeology and the Protection of Archaeological Resources in South Africa","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of African History","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Politics; Government (linguistics); Charter; Political science; Colonialism; Archaeology; Public administration; Geography; History; Economic growth; Law; Ethnology","score_opus":0.05437510252046681,"score_gpt":0.33218686045543344,"score_spread":0.27781175793496665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994834569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18046412,0.03379799,0.026288617,0.22766614,0.0012838858,0.00046087842,0.000358747,0.00009038682,0.5295892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741337,0.0040887934,0.008538351,0.0034896375,0.00028104597,0.00023399915,0.000054992946,0.00003125167,0.009148263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904813,0.0062061544,0.0006423532,0.00043462627,0.0009577622,0.0012777862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98272276,0.011101764,0.0017941685,0.001389179,0.0017363363,0.0012557028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015716074,0.00039156535,0.00037617196,0.0045528063,0.009905328,0.013575055,0.0018261933,0.0039113723,0.0043935273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018823687,0.00062126137,0.00023590695,0.004708363,0.04091523,0.0072300867,0.00993875,0.004846704,0.00030817057],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007785873,0.000012794032,0.000863151,0.00011315653,0.000003940048,0.00059652,0.030447032,0.0003495448,0.0002290071,0.9539931,0.0027603817,0.010623668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020612675,0.000025059167,0.0061965957,0.002924245,0.000019543459,0.0006305978,0.06427502,0.00076752016,0.0003279969,0.39866462,0.5260852,0.00006302686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0350947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044702053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0350947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013809697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024559792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10019684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997082908","doi":"10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.101","title":"Inevitability of Labour Broking in South Africa and the Need for Strict Regulation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Reviews on Global Economics","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Economics; Economic system; Labour economics; Development economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.027318801377680516,"score_gpt":0.30387043564056754,"score_spread":0.27655163426288704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997082908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5854952,0.027643634,0.005673698,0.22058487,0.00089625735,0.0002579672,0.00006350756,0.000036748523,0.15934813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97414976,0.005705715,0.0016452647,0.009342788,0.00009859484,0.0000829837,0.000010983635,0.000019539222,0.008944437],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883839,0.0048295944,0.0007390755,0.0010730261,0.0022828786,0.0026915048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99128765,0.0047581093,0.0020868417,0.0004953701,0.0006501977,0.00072177453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009322741,0.0002602698,0.0003171908,0.0010298417,0.010599638,0.0073358854,0.0014944958,0.0043148394,0.0031046385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0134816,0.00046484734,0.00038622282,0.00090293435,0.021353576,0.004382736,0.008236842,0.00650202,0.00029064342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009444396,0.00005788018,0.016093506,0.0021098836,0.000025679004,0.010107835,0.4710143,0.00037260307,0.006755102,0.4182926,0.0071488298,0.06792729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019932637,0.00011019343,0.025374224,0.008766271,0.000033889195,0.0037583394,0.46936485,0.00031379695,0.0026200556,0.07954324,0.409974,0.0001212218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02233777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029319922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02233777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065309773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015840195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04930401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998427861","doi":"10.36030/2664-3618-2018-1-85-108","title":"ЮРИДИЧНЕ РЕГУЛЮВАННЯ ВІДНОСИН У СФЕРІ УПРАВЛІННЯ ПРОЕКТАМИ ПУБЛІЧНО-ПРИВАТНОГО ПАРТНЕРСТВА У СВІТІ","year":2018,"lang":"uk","type":"article","venue":"Збірник наукових праць Національної академії державного управління при Президентові України","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine","score_opus":0.028518571387873174,"score_gpt":0.3711329744263023,"score_spread":0.3426144030384291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998427861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05316248,0.02231534,0.22060202,0.013164405,0.0016617255,0.0005376853,0.0010749866,0.0005174071,0.68696386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6850762,0.024324773,0.16799562,0.0009899281,0.0009281307,0.0007677323,0.0008555039,0.00038875954,0.1186733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799204,0.0004477106,0.00013871741,0.00033924633,0.00092782435,0.00015447945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981468,0.00067814795,0.00020974081,0.00025571763,0.0005822213,0.00012738469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023362504,0.00038540922,0.00026685544,0.0019288126,0.0014686623,0.0044066645,0.0005587046,0.00107374,0.018165456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004340228,0.00044295954,0.00034870245,0.0025174231,0.002955995,0.0023430653,0.0014434226,0.0018550871,0.0058441735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059233258,0.000060078775,0.0027248766,0.00052654295,0.00001835766,0.0007293904,0.005515311,0.0015328033,0.0037553108,0.7541162,0.013056938,0.21790503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002186765,0.000057709047,0.0056232563,0.00045138158,0.000030368565,0.0010109923,0.00228997,0.0016406354,0.0031946648,0.14405307,0.84156984,0.000056259916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005619642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005247185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018165456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021112654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047509433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060769558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003267222","doi":"","title":"Retail Worker Politics, Race and Consumption in South Africa: Shelved in the Service Economy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour / Le Travail","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Consumption (sociology); Politics; Service (business); Business; Economy; Economics; Political science; Sociology; Law; Social science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.024840740740690016,"score_gpt":0.2613500682622468,"score_spread":0.23650932752155682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003267222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9711311,0.0017570845,0.0000637711,0.009939881,0.000017144075,0.00000814205,0.0000709889,0.0000015479708,0.0170103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970477,0.00055161637,0.000020110116,0.0002630129,0.00000846261,0.0000062071813,0.000007850071,0.0000022144675,0.0020928234],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992086,0.0002616385,0.000015600508,0.00004413129,0.000044882294,0.00042506328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990318,0.00042868743,0.00023023691,0.000021932754,0.000060432623,0.00022702437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088063854,0.00016427253,0.00025972715,0.0011387304,0.0066911136,0.003788336,0.00045847896,0.0013633365,0.014715168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016943096,0.00024113667,0.00018740159,0.0027833101,0.00620027,0.0033367928,0.002685471,0.0015681237,0.0003308803],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049097976,0.00026692692,0.24625319,0.0003992452,0.00004344419,0.0028450196,0.5142111,0.00021897026,0.0016258714,0.19594815,0.0057096025,0.03198755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002415564,0.000058245656,0.3154039,0.00046442184,0.000028558932,0.00033878966,0.6474726,0.00020330878,0.00025398599,0.011425459,0.0242983,0.000028209795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13608311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2758228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13608311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049848966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27058208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004162162","doi":"10.26643/gis.v15i1.18704","title":"Predictors Of Efficiency In Municipal Solid Waste Management In Moses Kotane Municipality In The North-West Province Of South Africa","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GIS Business","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Municipal solid waste; Solid waste management; Business; Socioeconomic status; Environmental planning; Waste management; Environmental science; Environmental health; Population; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.03575204172753264,"score_gpt":0.2866763591676303,"score_spread":0.25092431744009763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004162162","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99968815,0.000026586935,0.000025566918,0.000036653495,3.9411194e-7,0.000005384019,0.000043704506,5.4904683e-7,0.00017311994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99978656,0.000040118026,0.000036646477,0.0000029400517,5.6496816e-7,0.000004387998,0.000042749507,3.732179e-7,0.00008567405],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994086,0.00016412248,0.000067009874,0.00005622439,0.00014321791,0.00016094284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978808,0.000448587,0.0010755907,0.00006592658,0.00029310104,0.00023595933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005965917,0.0002309914,0.00022518756,0.001077828,0.00074351084,0.00079776923,0.00030577715,0.00024642213,0.0015037103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043021077,0.0001975224,0.00015861519,0.0021533475,0.00057324907,0.00046410994,0.0006509967,0.00031578532,0.00014266238],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014646669,0.00002832043,0.99593383,0.000012978147,0.000010991872,0.00016346453,0.0014889649,0.00009218218,0.00023575895,0.00007106039,0.00005825807,0.0018895688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.503874e-7,0.000018354065,0.99503255,0.000010104758,0.0000035352264,0.00006279679,0.0043653534,0.00019024014,0.00006121366,0.00002281281,0.00022960454,0.000002656017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.074126594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1035794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074126594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011069741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012426701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14739025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005193046","doi":"10.1002/iir.1361","title":"Rectifying an unconstitutional dispensation? A consideration of proposed reforms relating to no income no asset debtors in South Africa","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debt; Asset (computer security); Economics; Intervention (counseling); Business; Finance","score_opus":0.08024285634923674,"score_gpt":0.37181749629770094,"score_spread":0.2915746399484642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005193046","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07601415,0.23800178,0.0022002,0.49659723,0.0044376375,0.0005898697,0.00016224742,0.00003576241,0.18196115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7192292,0.14922251,0.0029343157,0.10568166,0.0029140185,0.00032563673,0.00006905942,0.00002396892,0.01959966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98702973,0.0063206707,0.0010102271,0.00060302624,0.0024382605,0.0025980433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9775415,0.01595301,0.0026959216,0.0005742519,0.0024872033,0.0007480306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025022594,0.00031359313,0.000654599,0.0027103699,0.004294879,0.009324991,0.0025931036,0.011889121,0.0032802005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032590587,0.00035080692,0.0006456286,0.0026174134,0.009253842,0.0037941134,0.0028576658,0.008016903,0.00026664435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006867063,0.00013103127,0.0022623544,0.0026153198,0.00003914183,0.0026223017,0.009108142,0.0008298551,0.001570597,0.8927151,0.024223536,0.06381404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015564173,0.00046864158,0.018227568,0.014994686,0.00022633602,0.0014640128,0.020756178,0.0008628138,0.002496856,0.068904124,0.8712961,0.00014706857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03338714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049240746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03338714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008013009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02845736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1323337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005219098","doi":"","title":"Practice and procedure: UCPR 229 - defamation proceedings - damages to be assessed","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hogan; Damages; Plaintiff; Law; Political science; Legal action; Action (physics); Engineering; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.012174577972417657,"score_gpt":0.27580014579316947,"score_spread":0.2636255678207518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005219098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042545453,0.0072864564,0.021817718,0.19980444,0.0029982098,0.0011798774,0.0008341576,0.00050492794,0.72302884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48755926,0.0020356923,0.016427457,0.34858498,0.0022716527,0.0011716785,0.0002919057,0.00023161974,0.14142579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9486464,0.016451996,0.0050484985,0.0072673457,0.015981147,0.0066046175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9785115,0.013452428,0.0014559065,0.0018509864,0.003987992,0.0007412279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028328398,0.0011181053,0.0013630528,0.0015136546,0.010784858,0.013752995,0.004606274,0.04975834,0.0068007386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062455893,0.0019631837,0.0026275595,0.0013922926,0.01186263,0.0065797004,0.008344356,0.027543385,0.0037585602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010079439,0.00012378544,0.0016133648,0.00020482145,0.00007297585,0.0016305101,0.006369293,0.00063699944,0.0018859052,0.8543728,0.11880467,0.014184151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032758596,0.00096725544,0.011602722,0.0018483005,0.0003543005,0.0032744529,0.006635777,0.003007209,0.0043682917,0.17229053,0.79462934,0.00069419894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11565356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17354074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11565356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010125488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018401919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2299608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005361189","doi":"","title":"Practice and procedure: Personal Injuries Proceedings Act 2002 s 27(1) - duty of respondent to give information and documents","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Respondent; Law; Duty; Scope (computer science); Legislature; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Computer science","score_opus":0.005497805870604089,"score_gpt":0.2535990927887431,"score_spread":0.248101286918139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005361189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023024904,0.003481973,0.0064665303,0.20451587,0.0068945833,0.0059031667,0.010163674,0.0010439809,0.73850524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07213342,0.0017129461,0.008973437,0.39279538,0.0017402961,0.0060787625,0.0018697298,0.00018711729,0.5145089],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9688412,0.008351669,0.004817363,0.0026631304,0.009644052,0.0056824796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9727576,0.014013907,0.0018336109,0.0024257647,0.007438057,0.0015312053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027965266,0.0010604388,0.0012781554,0.0018797508,0.008684224,0.008632809,0.004006092,0.034207053,0.015998252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051518843,0.0028254837,0.0016044016,0.0021057695,0.004510266,0.003032616,0.0038700583,0.016053963,0.018159082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015242309,0.00032494048,0.0021498383,0.0003054592,0.000023141058,0.00075039297,0.008371566,0.00024321231,0.0029940617,0.1866851,0.7812746,0.016725227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015882171,0.00018438319,0.010090492,0.0007702646,0.000028201022,0.00034347392,0.0019148003,0.00025634345,0.00059729954,0.0045745564,0.9809203,0.00016099989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24257922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3385922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24257922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0119758705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03986734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4823345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006412958","doi":"","title":"Practice and procedure - Disclosure of documents - production for inspection","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Production (economics); Publishing; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Business; World Wide Web; Law; Accounting; Database; Economics","score_opus":0.008141806058587896,"score_gpt":0.2672262602857488,"score_spread":0.2590844542271609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006412958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033364557,0.019462654,0.09977445,0.28924054,0.0029291464,0.0013726474,0.00030556959,0.000390435,0.5531601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6591081,0.006693074,0.068187244,0.08872296,0.0011746985,0.0010578615,0.00027299603,0.00035705674,0.17442594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.85181665,0.08695102,0.010231405,0.007592422,0.03607261,0.0073357923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93473434,0.041569207,0.004989206,0.0076152594,0.010310587,0.0007813021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060012124,0.0004540553,0.00050563196,0.0022154136,0.008562357,0.01471749,0.003546736,0.016016195,0.0049280003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13440289,0.00094755495,0.0008405361,0.0029589578,0.023517549,0.010306646,0.008376401,0.010067275,0.0015425979],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026390338,0.00010803511,0.0025098212,0.00031895138,0.000018012859,0.00030011483,0.030759908,0.00023352925,0.0005234168,0.81865245,0.07073031,0.07581905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025506217,0.00019813151,0.0077298656,0.0019625097,0.000039531562,0.0012406342,0.016589269,0.000586124,0.0027247048,0.1728262,0.7959533,0.00012428041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03957754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05136578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060012124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007393797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029647196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31737822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007448233","doi":"","title":"An evaluation of the implementation of sector policing in the Eastern Cape","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Criminologica","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cape; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.18433433180565698,"score_gpt":0.446300000888135,"score_spread":0.261965669082478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007448233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99332523,0.000053974476,0.00017175397,0.0005045988,0.000030952164,0.0012649756,0.00008719721,0.000014482505,0.004546887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996781,0.00009303698,0.0011036678,0.0001286959,0.0000141961555,0.0005839831,0.000056721514,0.0000059547606,0.0012327725],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98776126,0.0061254497,0.0007821345,0.00072098285,0.0023087405,0.0023014478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96696365,0.012288896,0.0055205217,0.0026743414,0.005599238,0.0069532227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011271603,0.0006032872,0.0004875273,0.0016035907,0.0043939883,0.003246326,0.0025161551,0.0011672782,0.0049059317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04582904,0.00057190814,0.00043959855,0.0021526755,0.0026628356,0.0018480838,0.0020793374,0.0015748686,0.00037244696],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01092959,0.04895813,0.3213477,0.0030000145,0.000544207,0.004762328,0.16484739,0.009202722,0.009831325,0.01124623,0.004002425,0.4113279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024474217,0.03689978,0.8018289,0.00086729537,0.00030839932,0.0003044894,0.13718492,0.003979783,0.0021577522,0.0010685658,0.012836071,0.00011666651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13469972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18028536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13469972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018161882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036229778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26783133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007700209","doi":"","title":"Practice and procedure - Indemnity costs - whether indemnity costs can be ordered in the Magistrates Courts - Beardmore v Franklins Management Services","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proctor/˜The œproctor","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indemnity; Appeal; Honour; Loan; Law; Business; Actuarial science; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.0164442105133994,"score_gpt":0.3192601052528514,"score_spread":0.30281589473945203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007700209","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061092928,0.0021435025,0.004739382,0.14689195,0.0008174911,0.0004074435,0.00062224903,0.00006622647,0.7832188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8404956,0.0012035128,0.0033431642,0.04416027,0.0009009666,0.0004355109,0.00019031171,0.000046034136,0.109224655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9746131,0.006887459,0.0018766468,0.001982895,0.009739885,0.0049000075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96749973,0.018652542,0.0026792446,0.0027027493,0.0066398606,0.0018259033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012161666,0.0003242528,0.0004657904,0.0018061522,0.005974267,0.009748073,0.0021885212,0.011639048,0.01907616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0822136,0.0006129018,0.0007136947,0.00161873,0.008916578,0.006592182,0.0040442264,0.0085983975,0.0021780408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006245623,0.00011461459,0.0097310785,0.000117738804,0.000029230967,0.0006328683,0.0033261136,0.0002952409,0.00072212267,0.91236794,0.046241954,0.02635859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001724969,0.0006480273,0.07021555,0.0014818837,0.00017622767,0.0029109686,0.011099744,0.0017564873,0.004206748,0.23649481,0.6705667,0.0002703226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.064506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.114729226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009540966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020628117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12826103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008441642","doi":"","title":"Challenges facing the South African Police Service and community-based organisations in the war against drugs in a South African township","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Criminologica","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Service (business); Political science; Criminology; Public administration; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.16874966938426905,"score_gpt":0.3331064451573235,"score_spread":0.16435677577305446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008441642","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8137328,0.002246866,0.00032272516,0.15972824,0.0009072318,0.00022535176,0.000066935056,0.000014674711,0.022755207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9719114,0.0018500215,0.0004992163,0.013348941,0.00019412111,0.00013915985,0.000027457603,0.000023439772,0.012006321],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98830813,0.004095683,0.00028940532,0.00031258952,0.0006389606,0.0063553248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9786862,0.003066955,0.0014364688,0.00020426222,0.0013674868,0.015238702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065241093,0.0006558207,0.00058700226,0.0016344673,0.05236207,0.014493708,0.0032801428,0.008682727,0.018930882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011958653,0.0013753552,0.0004793018,0.0022346387,0.011587642,0.0060828933,0.019748196,0.013067963,0.0013233646],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028166166,0.0008440366,0.051136408,0.0007602958,0.000105117455,0.03341318,0.8216734,0.00047592298,0.0021163605,0.027894028,0.026967006,0.034332536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013157044,0.00008284486,0.009580754,0.00031559204,0.000012357931,0.0010331387,0.9653154,0.0000821363,0.000080202095,0.0008531857,0.022605237,0.000025921758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.103873946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2580495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.103873946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011252998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047913946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20653868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008469765","doi":"","title":"Costs on review - what charges are appropriate?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty of Law; School of Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Civil procedure; Actuarial science; Law; Operations research; Political science; Business; Engineering; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.09739257056085873,"score_gpt":0.38115776155142644,"score_spread":0.28376519099056774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008469765","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003421537,0.017651863,0.0036795742,0.89204276,0.016645525,0.00030994343,0.00037252225,0.00015867203,0.06571757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11096714,0.012870498,0.0071031526,0.8268326,0.019752122,0.0007416999,0.00030403963,0.00030928146,0.021119414],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.86718416,0.046630662,0.01769478,0.004618022,0.055252437,0.008620001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70237905,0.14756536,0.02045028,0.009048838,0.108119525,0.012436957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07185723,0.0007664772,0.0015844912,0.004798971,0.0056065265,0.014641809,0.0043044575,0.02318064,0.009696537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38945553,0.0008565669,0.0018900343,0.003808597,0.0078033744,0.01882958,0.005383128,0.016369509,0.0035244615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106238986,0.000068141664,0.002593163,0.0008629898,0.00007895026,0.00044400798,0.0014464224,0.00021343178,0.00024162904,0.14030129,0.78735155,0.0662923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012248746,0.000115439696,0.004512956,0.0043049334,0.00010488263,0.0005864669,0.002291304,0.00037711632,0.00044506197,0.061109643,0.92584044,0.00018921267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019859865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03288535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07185723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01432764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0272527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38002187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008629474","doi":"","title":"Sector policing as a vehicle to deliver police-community relations in KwaZulu-Natal : Paulpietersburg and Ulundi police stations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Criminologica","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Community policing; Criminology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.08635408439607471,"score_gpt":0.3662337035169792,"score_spread":0.2798796191209045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008629474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99461937,0.00015483245,0.00007048434,0.0006574301,0.000009026083,0.00007634123,0.00010154625,0.000004784363,0.0043060915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969915,0.00016280165,0.00012177311,0.000046486955,0.0000023027694,0.000051435076,0.000051156236,0.0000025501856,0.0025700033],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902487,0.00026181873,0.000040700772,0.00003837903,0.0000508092,0.0005833512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993631,0.00013496965,0.00016564465,0.000032723176,0.00008445807,0.00021918876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005474,0.00037235094,0.000203729,0.0010115688,0.00500264,0.0023314839,0.0009804121,0.00066662004,0.006573868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017044296,0.0006706384,0.00027549255,0.0018174448,0.0014206769,0.0015001491,0.0026477731,0.00082034,0.000546707],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082830945,0.00094405527,0.6271295,0.0010019377,0.000112707516,0.016766509,0.23888975,0.0012689697,0.011249796,0.017425926,0.0053620297,0.07902048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004017538,0.00028051308,0.6435456,0.00026870827,0.000066758344,0.00088297715,0.34406358,0.00058750337,0.0006565447,0.00061038387,0.00896128,0.000035952922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2820081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6194563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2820081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006460125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009661138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5607333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011319384","doi":"","title":"Default judgment - whether irregular - whether court has residual discretion not to set aside default judgment irregularly entered","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty of Law; School of Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Aside; Law; Residual; Political science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Linguistics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.057182657281343315,"score_gpt":0.3426607792697138,"score_spread":0.28547812198837047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011319384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5663295,0.001168776,0.013160579,0.046247605,0.0012473882,0.0005973726,0.0021034055,0.00026552196,0.36887985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707199,0.00016183467,0.001813717,0.011775005,0.00026561864,0.00009896124,0.00016364243,0.000038018858,0.014963231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9742925,0.0046658735,0.0027284303,0.004885925,0.0070298626,0.006397272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93417555,0.041067082,0.0047437157,0.0068469425,0.010522626,0.0026440425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023151007,0.00024013613,0.00079735316,0.0013230748,0.0056588887,0.008362019,0.0029457859,0.009237262,0.00922856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12296948,0.00047930135,0.0009540388,0.0015448087,0.00635782,0.008909177,0.003600991,0.011375181,0.001438943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016030757,0.00069486065,0.07167761,0.00031630843,0.00022924892,0.0047242725,0.020860005,0.0017995475,0.0053583155,0.75907344,0.07418465,0.059478685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091514044,0.0013449012,0.14518897,0.0015021424,0.0006284763,0.0032954402,0.028246963,0.011465731,0.014036022,0.5201056,0.27253225,0.00073847594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036226355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07763003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036226355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055815447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00839146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12243569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011632388","doi":"10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.133","title":"Outsourcing and Tendering Complexities in the South African Public Sector Institutions: A Demise of New Public Management Theory?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Reviews on Global Economics","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demise; Procurement; Outsourcing; Public sector; Business; Political science; Economics; Economy; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.13617364792431594,"score_gpt":0.33461809890062266,"score_spread":0.19844445097630672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011632388","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15737619,0.20354712,0.03244374,0.38541442,0.001290833,0.00014113367,0.00017829811,0.000046436937,0.21956176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9010856,0.07886614,0.0048464197,0.0073735546,0.0014990489,0.000082650084,0.00004300025,0.000035832138,0.0061677285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941248,0.0028612462,0.00027129857,0.00039494756,0.0011986727,0.001148968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9524906,0.03835312,0.005031666,0.0017952203,0.0016591296,0.0006701968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014800349,0.0004664137,0.0011574914,0.0035083012,0.0034480516,0.0152450055,0.0024928332,0.0066160294,0.011894997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02760202,0.00071647036,0.0009531788,0.0073225778,0.03843212,0.034784965,0.0040450045,0.0071691764,0.00039627854],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023640725,0.00003760265,0.00069130375,0.00038543067,0.0000121899475,0.0000942504,0.0038418826,0.0005806095,0.000077509045,0.9720293,0.0010531296,0.021173138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027510925,0.000038225233,0.0065889284,0.0030405982,0.000030926672,0.00028402478,0.021692012,0.002088133,0.00021329841,0.89066243,0.07528609,0.000047856378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017466037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01617198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017466037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011816054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02038365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085731864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012966730","doi":"","title":"Eenvoudige adoptie van pleegkinderen","year":2019,"lang":"nl","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Research and Documentation Center (WODC) (Scientific Research and Documentation Center)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"L'Alliance Boviteq","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Humanities; Theology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09597449817026094,"score_gpt":0.4349271570950536,"score_spread":0.33895265892479265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012966730","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14574873,0.0070242584,0.009345772,0.07789035,0.0012110578,0.00017450936,0.0002481423,0.00008479113,0.75827247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75370646,0.0039370954,0.0024040535,0.0056075505,0.00016032258,0.00019932934,0.00012292054,0.00018226591,0.23368002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.988318,0.0054641967,0.0004815425,0.00085308455,0.0030956266,0.0017876021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99494815,0.002144251,0.00057343335,0.00076201436,0.00088670035,0.00068538036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074189003,0.0003425858,0.0004178297,0.0010866326,0.008206456,0.009816077,0.0012005211,0.00273159,0.031022437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020660486,0.0004357778,0.0003132665,0.0014508,0.009360634,0.011327972,0.008992658,0.004951088,0.0030183627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040005623,0.00007312905,0.003513371,0.00016450773,0.00002117334,0.0011451391,0.20825666,0.00012828197,0.0009944227,0.68826014,0.036054354,0.061348893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012299904,0.000018564684,0.002342624,0.00041483564,0.000013008906,0.0003496181,0.08963865,0.000101661644,0.00048654515,0.03309194,0.87350714,0.000023000008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037621263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055314127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037621263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010146022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00972634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10378039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013873445","doi":"","title":"The end of the rope: The Criminal Law’s perspective regarding Acts of Consensual Sexual Violence between adult partners within the South African, English and Canadian legal frameworks.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"ResearchSpace (University of KwaZulu-Natal)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Rope; Criminology; Law; Political science; Sexual violence; English law; Sexual assault; Psychology; Engineering; Medicine; Human factors and ergonomics; Medical emergency; Poison control; Computer science; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.025367168913446557,"score_gpt":0.3167061869184492,"score_spread":0.29133901800500267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013873445","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14673725,0.009825642,0.0026076448,0.28702646,0.00088311144,0.000060042978,0.00010187205,0.000010982756,0.552747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9705137,0.0021544427,0.0004566504,0.010735313,0.00010868137,0.00003061064,0.00002197861,0.000021627098,0.015956962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896144,0.0063727344,0.00017062188,0.0004939947,0.00091114297,0.002437141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991102,0.0051523787,0.00064094015,0.00034898115,0.001183691,0.0015720006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008266116,0.00039716915,0.00041177546,0.0023674446,0.031434275,0.01705314,0.0023289674,0.010551948,0.0051655252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015357841,0.00041620657,0.00045544788,0.0020790466,0.06327378,0.016550057,0.010050353,0.017239254,0.00039007585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011511481,0.000015107002,0.0008386535,0.000024109491,0.000003812813,0.0006984014,0.43377873,0.000065173524,0.0000615954,0.55613554,0.005124244,0.0032430156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068780973,0.000015416546,0.002645235,0.0004852767,0.000009756607,0.00039344694,0.78406245,0.00013721957,0.00011842183,0.09531033,0.11679272,0.000022841417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23999186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3208654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76000816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015901571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027241567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4771899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016085588","doi":"","title":"Is die hersieningsgrond \"rasionaliteit\" in artikel 6(2)(f)(ii) van wet 3 van 2000 van toepassing op huishoudelike dissiplinêre tribunale?National Horseracing Authority of Southern Africa v Naidoo 2010 3 SA 182 (KZP) : regspraak","year":2012,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Journal of South African Law / Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Art; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04007099994512386,"score_gpt":0.31370415904160354,"score_spread":0.2736331590964797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016085588","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005391447,0.0045861267,0.0015393307,0.03160089,0.008626546,0.00007623433,0.0006634607,0.00017188244,0.9473441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.113680676,0.0023433068,0.001756804,0.012538764,0.0023836626,0.00017756346,0.0005863695,0.0003912423,0.86614156],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782723,0.0006208961,0.00010183714,0.00028200448,0.0006665284,0.00050160143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834263,0.00069509837,0.00010488013,0.0002645633,0.00040607498,0.00018682003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023306734,0.0007507384,0.00025708904,0.0017325834,0.0077251573,0.01146811,0.0014340368,0.0038658364,0.050490063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004494777,0.00035941508,0.00066004094,0.0016737833,0.0056413654,0.0031280082,0.00284815,0.0062354477,0.012302663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004260275,0.000028098877,0.00058372976,0.00021910753,0.000006857994,0.0002902321,0.025359798,0.00013042559,0.00051868265,0.40388155,0.5465036,0.022435306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020925838,0.0000048360835,0.00075057836,0.000104625266,0.0000021882124,0.00005087099,0.0020190256,0.0000249306,0.00015089675,0.0033526141,0.9935278,0.000009600216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.068021476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09818185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068021476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005772565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005354949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1689061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3021099728","doi":"10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.142","title":"Impacts of Coal Mining in Witbank, Mpumalanga Province of South Africa: An Eco-Legal Perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Reviews on Global Economics","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Coal; Coal mining; Business; Geography; Natural resource economics; Mining engineering; Environmental planning; Environmental protection; Economics; Geology; Archaeology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.027746429918937266,"score_gpt":0.32114896814476546,"score_spread":0.2934025382258282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3021099728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92139673,0.02551795,0.0002864772,0.01317865,0.00007865609,0.000056737448,0.00077355636,0.000005416365,0.03870571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863645,0.011942825,0.0001403948,0.00025196487,0.000012282428,0.000012740135,0.000055569148,0.0000023581517,0.0012172896],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992181,0.0002114842,0.000029865165,0.0000408725,0.000117047115,0.00038258955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990652,0.00034980377,0.00036034937,0.000013063853,0.00011773894,0.00009374201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061706855,0.00029085772,0.0002411776,0.0024488627,0.0014332271,0.0026158055,0.00062338356,0.00089791924,0.004729648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021206078,0.00019172321,0.00030466414,0.0051825023,0.0026117407,0.0019512121,0.0020420349,0.0008058601,0.00013338083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000743419,0.0007032853,0.40425453,0.011534988,0.0008532542,0.02542438,0.053480774,0.012487853,0.016296692,0.25756025,0.009113808,0.20754676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004375421,0.00022398234,0.7806425,0.0045128977,0.00037007136,0.001703456,0.12610002,0.0019882957,0.0021474012,0.018587787,0.06360892,0.00007102131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1810586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37554395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1810586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073926747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077337157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36000943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3021493680","doi":"","title":"The Power of Prevention: The extent of Environmental Authority in the Context of Local Government","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Government (linguistics); Local government; Sociology; Local authority; Political science; Public administration; Geography; Linguistics; Archaeology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011079794982840754,"score_gpt":0.26665610186646144,"score_spread":0.2555763068836207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3021493680","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27687576,0.0038465958,0.019611515,0.06014275,0.00014747547,0.00009204589,0.000051165192,0.000056150526,0.63917667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99771106,0.00021007676,0.00023945185,0.00036101972,0.000034035063,0.00001550659,0.000003578645,0.0000052612454,0.0014200414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98345196,0.009611472,0.0005420082,0.0010438982,0.0024691352,0.0028815584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98498374,0.008908015,0.0019303508,0.0012691546,0.0014526125,0.0014561175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01178556,0.00022533961,0.00047136194,0.0029811135,0.012944576,0.01272439,0.0019311154,0.0034640718,0.0030491434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016485972,0.00047051077,0.00044271068,0.0021844858,0.07779279,0.010452906,0.010322115,0.0043647583,0.00021154844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007945115,0.000012564171,0.0014878514,0.000022088945,0.0000052166693,0.00013367827,0.018588966,0.0002993759,0.00013101334,0.97637594,0.0004370916,0.0024982933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050653067,0.0000827087,0.011651789,0.00046150936,0.000051581417,0.00034600036,0.07515116,0.0014539367,0.00055795425,0.80309725,0.1070255,0.000069953916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049740665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054659043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049740665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01305477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017672958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098902285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022419904","doi":"","title":"Statutory Recognition of Indigenous Custom Adoption: Its Role in Strengthening Self-Governance Over Child Welfare","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Statutory law; Corporate governance; Welfare; Business; Sociology; Law; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.009240907442018293,"score_gpt":0.2480614602751862,"score_spread":0.2388205528331679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022419904","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46051475,0.0028160021,0.009037176,0.056497652,0.00028557863,0.00015100447,0.000073095056,0.000096483454,0.47052836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98911065,0.0003659463,0.000790956,0.0019738,0.00004042465,0.000030015504,0.000012006471,0.000007943918,0.0076682237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896511,0.0020572396,0.00047678227,0.0007197433,0.003919421,0.0031758153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867291,0.0057321987,0.0018924392,0.0011142244,0.0035124703,0.0010197136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00915525,0.00015108241,0.00032921138,0.0010659746,0.010015216,0.0061660134,0.0018917902,0.0029301904,0.001567329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01915857,0.00024374151,0.00032141173,0.0014064154,0.024180474,0.0020743634,0.0047351443,0.005667089,0.000118233336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011891632,0.00003038364,0.00927119,0.000040061375,0.000008095039,0.00041113197,0.032049466,0.0003830182,0.00070187607,0.9397414,0.0018884396,0.015463084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000774141,0.0002523111,0.17330992,0.0019607309,0.00013266006,0.0014038506,0.13513967,0.0038758935,0.0047018197,0.24879856,0.42995828,0.0003889314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.607831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7276475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.607831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025393292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06937667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7889571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022508769","doi":"10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.141","title":"Critical Analysis of the “Duty of Care” in the Protection of the South African Environment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Reviews on Global Economics","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.022144665527835297,"score_gpt":0.2997688685096839,"score_spread":0.2776242029818486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022508769","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0076674363,0.09722337,0.0047879433,0.8237928,0.011666424,0.00015261793,0.000059396363,0.000008913182,0.05464102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67961293,0.05803429,0.005684034,0.23127426,0.013885382,0.00048649264,0.0000418534,0.000050160033,0.010930615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9672444,0.023763064,0.0012490758,0.0011494166,0.0045910524,0.0020029107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8846699,0.100827776,0.0032329336,0.001932886,0.008024387,0.0013121482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05851707,0.00068204483,0.0011564201,0.0028353727,0.005627545,0.007886942,0.0029472176,0.01462078,0.0052711032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09965438,0.00040659422,0.001069574,0.0015245685,0.042055674,0.010865296,0.0050190086,0.017165909,0.00027847904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006046791,0.000016357077,0.00014163846,0.00094361056,0.000039037932,0.00015571882,0.0039787237,0.00033636676,0.000101342855,0.9524569,0.02625007,0.015519807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055363995,0.000053457847,0.0013996675,0.008667963,0.00009153731,0.00023021278,0.009142687,0.0004451731,0.00041740728,0.7123429,0.26710698,0.000046599907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0093604475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009146331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05851707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015137892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0284338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30947155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033719684","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2020.1773017","title":"Remedying formal irregularities in wills: a comparative analysis of testamentary rescue in Canada and South Africa","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Foundation; Louisiana State University","keywords":"Testamentary trust; Law; Statute; Jurisprudence; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03996326956342198,"score_gpt":0.2599483294766122,"score_spread":0.21998505991319026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033719684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89741784,0.0022741593,0.00050735415,0.0061031063,0.000041636875,0.00016962388,0.00020069376,0.0000102749655,0.093275376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992576,0.0012888169,0.0003565532,0.00055679283,0.00000395476,0.000028540908,0.000068830996,0.000010356626,0.005110142],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99530715,0.00052323716,0.00011873101,0.00022976211,0.0009812475,0.0028398945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99263835,0.0024588422,0.0008779793,0.00022365137,0.0024399285,0.0013612319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022396562,0.00034722878,0.00052949967,0.00507989,0.02131718,0.006023744,0.0017465241,0.0013710303,0.004740455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01226886,0.00040221462,0.00035403247,0.00727863,0.009819131,0.0018276185,0.0041773557,0.002804088,0.0001795718],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027657257,0.00017502868,0.13797913,0.0007112386,0.0001522374,0.009875566,0.46246356,0.0019810786,0.0028903543,0.30784392,0.010204905,0.06544651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003937057,0.000043613716,0.21897087,0.0011554391,0.000111652706,0.0008698404,0.6454155,0.00080501265,0.0010444847,0.005054621,0.12636174,0.00012786685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9879866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99697876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10996488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10996488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13333382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7978548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036560524","doi":"10.7939/r3-pj8n-ed15","title":"Housing First Programs in Alberta and the Right to Housing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Alberta Library","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental planning; Business; Political science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.016007247638656665,"score_gpt":0.20620752067561196,"score_spread":0.1902002730369553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036560524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9220498,0.0018634844,0.00066721684,0.006399549,0.00009544138,0.00011577818,0.00017314203,0.000021209424,0.06861438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900558,0.00073426956,0.00056897884,0.00066472165,0.000012460792,0.00003522773,0.000072497314,0.0000050084345,0.007851111],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99649173,0.00067977794,0.000043825916,0.00018476616,0.0010923109,0.0015076414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99659145,0.0006975053,0.00045106988,0.00010190831,0.00092332956,0.0012347894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028396742,0.00014959513,0.00021515528,0.001139846,0.004093865,0.0034124905,0.0014888169,0.0006449042,0.0035871153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004489062,0.00015402623,0.00023365123,0.001716461,0.0038777275,0.001108161,0.0034465624,0.0012711278,0.00009471102],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033747978,0.0009364284,0.41313303,0.00060306344,0.00007421338,0.0009218872,0.13607644,0.0020839786,0.0014396624,0.14075473,0.013540446,0.2900987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004786127,0.0003089748,0.7681368,0.0011283655,0.000057572874,0.00018596293,0.12798591,0.0013378813,0.0007247401,0.006906651,0.09311309,0.00006621013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9036402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95694506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09635979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039491057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054936767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.286529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039473221","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.08","title":"The Imperilled Right to Life, Femicide Crisis in South Africa: Critical Considerations for Legislators","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Femicide; Criminology; Legislature; State (computer science); Human rights; Law; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Poison control; Domestic violence; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.09012589169491791,"score_gpt":0.3763832856786459,"score_spread":0.28625739398372796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039473221","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12480752,0.058332697,0.0014808729,0.7629882,0.0030840447,0.0001827282,0.00003483433,0.000022363625,0.04906672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90206945,0.028266773,0.0013077802,0.05793032,0.0008513139,0.00029692455,0.000018749377,0.00003521642,0.009223413],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878835,0.007890211,0.00049682945,0.0005712721,0.0010249444,0.0021332644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9768217,0.01827885,0.0014096707,0.00032682795,0.00147887,0.0016840653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021585349,0.0004225915,0.0008100442,0.0017548074,0.032661363,0.015300276,0.0026594768,0.013068183,0.0045005903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028105127,0.00068721984,0.00044106832,0.0025792979,0.039781053,0.013807788,0.010006407,0.018378608,0.00033332102],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001673429,0.000058474398,0.0013224784,0.0007964589,0.0000075559174,0.0020504182,0.7890264,0.00007824978,0.00044889623,0.18137768,0.012545556,0.012271106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004954282,0.000040201296,0.001635207,0.0023174083,0.000010688611,0.0005102557,0.820781,0.000074767166,0.00022338005,0.018102108,0.15627019,0.000029810262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019678539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025838682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032661363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012705744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031684272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11415559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046978994","doi":"10.3366/ajicl.2020.0323","title":"What Weight (If Any) Should Be Attached to Children's Wishes and Views in Child Relocation Disputes? Lessons from Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of International and Comparative Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relocation; Agency (philosophy); Best interests; Affect (linguistics); Political science; Law; Family law; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.08598854467025008,"score_gpt":0.3488582449759353,"score_spread":0.26286970030568524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046978994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.600266,0.013570697,0.00113065,0.1589875,0.0003432614,0.00011428508,0.0002868289,0.000020611837,0.22528015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97837585,0.006516365,0.00089167414,0.0047755376,0.000029052284,0.0000314494,0.000046909143,0.000015791507,0.009317439],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945679,0.0017495655,0.00018013622,0.0002912781,0.0011667073,0.0020444067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891207,0.0052468833,0.00052991795,0.00017627045,0.0030902398,0.0018360289],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055197733,0.0002801514,0.0004771081,0.0011096399,0.018041737,0.007075692,0.0014329678,0.0024394162,0.0036964302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01917951,0.000297917,0.00032396356,0.0025389171,0.010161165,0.002675789,0.0035726437,0.0050954605,0.0001767802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021675583,0.00010131837,0.06335389,0.0004938146,0.000061114246,0.005270041,0.59113264,0.0010424625,0.0009868412,0.22833593,0.027445033,0.08156013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051128856,0.000055618326,0.045695428,0.0016832185,0.000088722176,0.00080508855,0.7448151,0.0007803209,0.0010153473,0.016383352,0.18845722,0.00016943528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9918595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99699235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10069028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10069028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1372352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73056257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3047893425","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340060","title":"The Powers of the South African Public Protector: A Note on Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker of the National Assembly","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Scope (computer science); Political science; Relation (database); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05807562474425876,"score_gpt":0.3166075339409355,"score_spread":0.25853190919667673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3047893425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16467245,0.014178014,0.0050245966,0.40250373,0.0070534884,0.00036258434,0.00033960544,0.00006452103,0.405801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84799093,0.005554618,0.0021941313,0.094600804,0.0028900092,0.0003104159,0.000040939685,0.000051327304,0.04636683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990729,0.0031199618,0.0007396763,0.0013880086,0.002012114,0.0020112258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9774529,0.019911045,0.0006554142,0.00044412975,0.0010876434,0.00044891995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012434736,0.00066400325,0.001104498,0.0019390703,0.017698077,0.01370104,0.003090491,0.026238592,0.0041505005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021238301,0.0011058026,0.0011347828,0.0017707817,0.02081961,0.0054034907,0.004778434,0.032627907,0.0005990618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059019192,0.00003429648,0.0006157429,0.00010357509,0.00002334665,0.0029816998,0.016981358,0.00024283121,0.0012639714,0.9548732,0.019029574,0.0037914678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018109399,0.00028759576,0.0075455476,0.003818819,0.00037757307,0.0012612564,0.045933314,0.0017189226,0.0085449265,0.39654738,0.53324884,0.00053472683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10781688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14183602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10781688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015614489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015851779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2143786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048084044","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340059","title":"Is There a Need for Legislative Recognition of Rehabilitative Maintenance in South Africa? Lessons from Specified States of the United States of America","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Legislature; Discretion; Order (exchange); Law; Spouse; Business; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.10222546332533636,"score_gpt":0.348290597979472,"score_spread":0.24606513465413563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048084044","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4541048,0.020653747,0.002601116,0.34381962,0.0008538228,0.00020133794,0.00023157803,0.000037198144,0.17749678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732627,0.005442118,0.0014084984,0.015348726,0.00010467366,0.00010727289,0.000041422198,0.000014708003,0.0042698295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728465,0.000891058,0.00022018244,0.00019440617,0.0002890674,0.0011207415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922889,0.0042966283,0.0010319179,0.00039379564,0.0011768093,0.0008118524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065614204,0.00016842455,0.00030518303,0.001762003,0.004997687,0.0043537356,0.00088337954,0.0019338145,0.0052257697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01208151,0.0002947179,0.00037820195,0.0018704588,0.0039239507,0.003688701,0.0040535065,0.0043489966,0.00016447816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017860379,0.00023940376,0.058441255,0.0011292521,0.000086789056,0.003691657,0.085604,0.0007303196,0.004195432,0.6676859,0.01908488,0.15893248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111669055,0.00021291622,0.20923077,0.00885021,0.00023037182,0.0016723569,0.17134917,0.0010268234,0.0038124514,0.0855275,0.517734,0.00024170335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09255887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16141322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09255887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052909446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01450416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18404019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048599398","doi":"","title":"Consent, Coercion, and Shared Parenting: Ruffudeen-Coutts v Coutts","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05136468322551728,"score_gpt":0.3043930437155806,"score_spread":0.25302836049006333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048599398","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13615802,0.028768325,0.0049461885,0.6544876,0.004522012,0.00028979612,0.00014326983,0.00004784772,0.17063695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78790325,0.00673723,0.0014790263,0.18109903,0.001791602,0.00035264232,0.00004156288,0.000040839208,0.020554842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98794043,0.005560462,0.00065817375,0.0015938847,0.0017502594,0.0024968013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849664,0.0121663585,0.00049555965,0.0006799839,0.00082380127,0.0008679072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02386649,0.0005776244,0.0012196806,0.0010116474,0.015082414,0.006252439,0.0033288035,0.041465115,0.0029251794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041195434,0.00085598545,0.0009545853,0.0012377393,0.027202291,0.009864465,0.007037419,0.032860186,0.00021994414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008547875,0.0000652456,0.0020158803,0.0000979785,0.00003064662,0.0020583824,0.042305246,0.00015628785,0.00017877934,0.90720296,0.030759118,0.015044111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000333019,0.00013448534,0.0053829183,0.0030339404,0.00028088142,0.0029334812,0.062976286,0.0009770091,0.0011450424,0.59007853,0.33244067,0.0002837486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10883559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18924941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10883559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006569133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028164411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21640414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091380475","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.65","title":"Victimisation of African Foreign Nationals in Durban, South Africa","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign national; Victimisation; Criminology; Deportation; Harm; Government (linguistics); Political science; Harassment; Law enforcement; Xenophobia; Law; Politics; Sociology; Immigration; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.09142455886152369,"score_gpt":0.3435112650397908,"score_spread":0.2520867061782671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3091380475","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968624,0.0006240692,0.000023448569,0.0005148183,0.000020499112,0.000019213694,0.000019432746,0.0000017281574,0.0019142629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970499,0.0014307059,0.00006995826,0.00021273964,0.000008602876,0.00002970967,0.000014278448,0.0000020663329,0.0011820373],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990677,0.00051609596,0.00004051716,0.00004458546,0.00009856479,0.00023250912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998862,0.00035345802,0.00032997748,0.000051160456,0.00011852415,0.00028498156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011444511,0.00043923745,0.00047428315,0.0013789757,0.0069924197,0.00216909,0.00070932833,0.0012166898,0.0042536943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003505072,0.00033742195,0.00019255716,0.0010293404,0.0031875672,0.0012975502,0.0035766233,0.0010708163,0.0003350983],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007808144,0.0000679847,0.045879364,0.000250404,0.000010660215,0.00837232,0.9315407,0.000021945174,0.0012289606,0.0009349537,0.0010759322,0.0105386125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024822205,0.000087777764,0.028209683,0.0002568296,0.000004576134,0.0020553109,0.9652132,0.000021372596,0.00009208457,0.000074366835,0.003974313,0.000007957192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022842094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043460097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022842094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001765277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013860244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045418322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094339767","doi":"","title":"The Historic Re-Run Election in Malawi and the Future of Governance – Paul Mkandawire","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Conversation; Political science; History; Library science; Media studies; Public administration; Sociology; Management; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.00482240540984081,"score_gpt":0.24859184303538007,"score_spread":0.24376943762553926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094339767","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04063487,0.027898328,0.0008640086,0.7550698,0.008547807,0.000057059493,0.00018393612,0.000040034727,0.16670416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6352294,0.0367782,0.0012217292,0.069409914,0.004035742,0.00016122842,0.00014768199,0.00021886743,0.25279722],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821043,0.00087288796,0.000041558687,0.00008750754,0.00033353257,0.00045415486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981212,0.0011310009,0.00016251116,0.000062702056,0.00020300125,0.0003195791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022751181,0.00024155823,0.00022049513,0.00049800397,0.014314717,0.006866945,0.0004403724,0.0024897985,0.0074088043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005368549,0.00028232436,0.00013948091,0.0009456114,0.0064174975,0.0049273805,0.0026562258,0.005820895,0.0007525485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040154784,0.00002505469,0.001068056,0.00033465435,0.0000068686654,0.0010029089,0.22543456,0.000095920324,0.0005471005,0.28641227,0.46469453,0.020337977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015991195,0.0000056534705,0.0011814047,0.0002363429,0.0000015917038,0.00015639496,0.033509128,0.000024169982,0.00016903944,0.002806529,0.9618985,0.0000097325865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032893434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0839557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032893434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076704174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056048757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06540394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3099010709","doi":"","title":"Contextualizing alternate dispute resolution: an agile approach to resolve disputes in infrastructure projects","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Online dispute resolution; Agile software development; Business; Dispute mechanism; Critical infrastructure; Alternative dispute resolution; Resolution (logic); Law and economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.05947191633760109,"score_gpt":0.3299700783830015,"score_spread":0.27049816204540045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3099010709","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04996321,0.000677859,0.89847827,0.014711044,0.00024271799,0.0009087774,0.00009219426,0.00036081744,0.034565195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4087677,0.00037752884,0.5857605,0.00092205085,0.000054113458,0.0006653807,0.00013699032,0.000111724774,0.0032039494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.86596966,0.10782098,0.005052687,0.0050135036,0.012491034,0.0036521873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82225585,0.1328535,0.011732317,0.016813314,0.0129284365,0.003416706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.085224316,0.0013706179,0.0009919358,0.0069941385,0.009854079,0.018617732,0.008971978,0.006045034,0.004208532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13236879,0.0014331063,0.001369529,0.005714411,0.019632543,0.021055728,0.024764147,0.009840676,0.0006475877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009039773,0.00026639397,0.008915663,0.0007436506,0.0000869169,0.0015281073,0.22292326,0.009968072,0.0020578902,0.57702583,0.0054897065,0.17090411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007786179,0.00018129461,0.0024770692,0.00175684,0.000090503956,0.0012789197,0.28445408,0.058734585,0.0026370953,0.52697295,0.1211528,0.00018597605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007610993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013738406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085224316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067986357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017126013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45071465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3102961379","doi":"10.18357/ijcyfs114202019941","title":"DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION OF THE CHILD CARE SYSTEM IN LITHUANIA","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Child Youth and Family Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Scope (computer science); Politics; Christian ministry; Social security; Process (computing); Political science; Qualitative research; Public administration; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.031505174493361654,"score_gpt":0.302321469300907,"score_spread":0.2708162948075453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3102961379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9631658,0.004226059,0.0008751823,0.006906489,0.00009327775,0.00017598028,0.00013759683,0.000027150421,0.02439251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977849,0.00044839914,0.00028638323,0.0003534313,0.000010119633,0.000067463545,0.000031435127,0.0000045936977,0.0010132947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98971736,0.005099744,0.0008749459,0.0005408356,0.0009398099,0.002827214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995943,0.0012806326,0.0014785894,0.0005473226,0.0003800337,0.0003703264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007107905,0.00017400311,0.00032568973,0.0017830831,0.0061721327,0.0054731485,0.0011594826,0.0009565983,0.0017983075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007750504,0.00038678874,0.00027299454,0.003550928,0.010681426,0.0015504477,0.0073061837,0.0014467542,0.0001362981],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015384796,0.00013185997,0.14327343,0.0010571522,0.00008682551,0.004675004,0.3470058,0.0013005141,0.0019162388,0.42610067,0.003989293,0.07030941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007043114,0.00026011426,0.4840704,0.0028206613,0.000056817324,0.0016475774,0.3144277,0.00065831386,0.0030617812,0.013165996,0.17963985,0.000120284334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05712818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061262075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05712818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018680712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03092681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1355387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108152910","doi":"10.1002/iir.1400","title":"The impact of constitutional property law on insolvency law in South Africa","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Legislation; Law; Creditor; Constitution; Property (philosophy); Numerus clausus; Law and economics; Business; Real property; Property rights; Property law; Political science; Economics; Finance; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08609690609543058,"score_gpt":0.3776087350731606,"score_spread":0.29151182897773004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108152910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24984886,0.1523239,0.00567984,0.04873759,0.00046665312,0.00016531254,0.00005983673,0.000024524084,0.5426936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96816283,0.026231088,0.0006158866,0.0017988008,0.00011347762,0.00004813751,0.000008800089,0.0000045343795,0.0030164665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937704,0.0037257161,0.00034091808,0.00033279657,0.00096202514,0.0008679858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9822375,0.014937975,0.0014397564,0.00039362325,0.0008239882,0.00016717393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009368906,0.00019614992,0.00040756652,0.0028256516,0.0030381759,0.0065305256,0.00068440643,0.0024521786,0.003489118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013180221,0.00026553267,0.00030684425,0.0024883018,0.017887902,0.0033025383,0.0029857287,0.0024643196,0.00014553081],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008981241,0.000011807815,0.00087686244,0.00037848265,0.000008855198,0.0011229648,0.005124715,0.000464493,0.00043709882,0.978566,0.0008735668,0.012126326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073353825,0.0002625251,0.026990559,0.010574053,0.00020164388,0.0023719224,0.025605485,0.0017623447,0.003756058,0.38231128,0.54596436,0.00012646742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017410904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014969358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017410904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00583527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008048987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04954815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110999353","doi":"","title":"2011. 03. 058. Требилкок М. , Дэниэлс Р. Реформа господства права и развитие: намечая тонкую тропу прогресса. Trebilcock M. j. , Daniels R. j. rule of law reform and development: charting the fragile path of progress. - Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2008. - 372 p. - Rec. Ad Op. : ceric I. // Canadien j. of law and society. - Calgary, 2010. - Vol. 25, n 1. - p. 121-122","year":2011,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Социальные и гуманитарные науки. Отечественная и зарубежная литература. Сер. 4, Государство и право: Реферативный журнал","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Path (computing); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02956775104682746,"score_gpt":0.25688782350121336,"score_spread":0.2273200724543859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110999353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00081453705,0.01143806,0.0006892249,0.015148011,0.0022227045,0.0000647152,0.0045329784,0.00061155163,0.9644783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0081046205,0.0056382413,0.00065059535,0.0015693037,0.00050275936,0.00009243717,0.0015461043,0.00035334865,0.9815425],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996985,0.000039777617,0.000019841644,0.00004811183,0.00012232998,0.00007161959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993505,0.00013136739,0.00007496968,0.00005219805,0.00025029035,0.00014070966],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005729448,0.00083649275,0.00041708013,0.001218039,0.0014595607,0.004182516,0.0011962189,0.0034957363,0.79510236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001858311,0.00041737524,0.00038020266,0.0016639013,0.0007766041,0.0026494486,0.0015233583,0.0018582712,0.6601919],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007956999,0.000047703692,0.00045582865,0.00031068843,0.0000061064743,0.00017210424,0.0003168307,0.000024575553,0.00019877052,0.016042339,0.8080378,0.17430776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026493217,0.000019584024,0.0019752416,0.00039387442,0.000006728619,0.0002776035,0.00035590678,0.000041195355,0.00013423478,0.0037385449,0.9930199,0.000010625617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010725282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01601228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79510236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013000898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021443907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2922616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111597585","doi":"10.47689/2181-1415-vol1-iss2-pp104-116","title":"Contextualizing alternate dispute resolution: an agile approach to resolve disputes in infrastructure projects","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Общество и инновации","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Agile software development; Resolution (logic); Business; Online dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Critical infrastructure; Political science; Computer science; Law; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.05915888088027054,"score_gpt":0.3301266905315525,"score_spread":0.270967809651282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111597585","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055240415,0.00076384976,0.88747084,0.016450174,0.00024852704,0.00090769713,0.00008437945,0.0003105803,0.038523417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47429404,0.00041634295,0.5203348,0.0008224023,0.000050541865,0.00066877285,0.000107572334,0.00009352171,0.003212137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8792528,0.096014224,0.004739825,0.0043999483,0.01225009,0.0033431246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8312077,0.12880251,0.011528162,0.013856359,0.0113030635,0.0033022456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.082190275,0.001251678,0.0009250645,0.007322615,0.01016023,0.018078674,0.008412643,0.0060691778,0.0039129867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12486816,0.0013732257,0.0012454523,0.0057813427,0.02221135,0.020985916,0.023134751,0.009317963,0.0005476419],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067111665,0.0001853838,0.0072664255,0.00058810884,0.000063907595,0.0014390788,0.21408087,0.007338071,0.0016102316,0.63226646,0.0038382353,0.13125604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006379802,0.00014876082,0.0023404558,0.0016252453,0.000071496404,0.0012883038,0.29365414,0.041839734,0.0022102722,0.5487731,0.10782056,0.00016417932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073716114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012819482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082190275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007185129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017990362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4346689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114177557","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340070","title":"The Case for the Constitutionalisation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ESCRs) in Botswana","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Cultural rights; Human rights; Social rights; Political science; Accountability; Fundamental rights; Constitution; International human rights law; Politics; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.09728896319440221,"score_gpt":0.37992898036501344,"score_spread":0.2826400171706112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114177557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62302965,0.0032458976,0.005822083,0.15017477,0.0005316001,0.00018558586,0.00006795104,0.000031100673,0.21691135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99035585,0.00018029001,0.0007455007,0.0046430454,0.00002038836,0.000057118654,0.0000052029322,0.0000042989473,0.0039882683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914984,0.004557283,0.00031597313,0.0005843029,0.0006592691,0.0023847846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866496,0.010101632,0.0007157606,0.001032086,0.0009231526,0.00057786214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013930136,0.00022085322,0.00036171626,0.00095655274,0.0075952196,0.008609493,0.0011980325,0.005397945,0.0031858617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015472775,0.00044332852,0.00038520686,0.0011579307,0.018274711,0.0048580305,0.006257143,0.0075573735,0.00014654233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031060645,0.000018564908,0.0018831402,0.000056726,0.0000075030184,0.0012762359,0.01026336,0.00020550979,0.0009973784,0.97819155,0.0015956167,0.005473354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019982005,0.0002152635,0.014365854,0.0018479144,0.00009335486,0.0017180792,0.053828765,0.0019299024,0.0033874668,0.57837534,0.34390405,0.00013422463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042591617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04602675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042591617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011792982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0125140585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085564494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114308825","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340072","title":"Strategic Litigation in South Africa and Uganda: Shared Perspectives and Comparative Lessons","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Sanitation; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Government (linguistics); Political science; Economic growth; Public administration; Development economics; Law; Economics; Geography; Medicine","score_opus":0.20546898267733332,"score_gpt":0.37960530496386546,"score_spread":0.17413632228653214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114308825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75772953,0.022513043,0.0015359509,0.04802191,0.00033500092,0.00008587083,0.000058011694,0.000008770609,0.16971192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99199194,0.0049424125,0.00025906306,0.0008978632,0.00005181938,0.000042680822,0.000009540523,0.000004314616,0.0018004068],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916482,0.0057127643,0.00021571766,0.00022598029,0.0006389254,0.0015584195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857314,0.011842252,0.0010588841,0.00020710214,0.0005894151,0.0005709792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009779506,0.0004423901,0.0006087054,0.005452762,0.025978742,0.015095786,0.0013763806,0.004778666,0.0049442705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014500846,0.00046042108,0.0002987421,0.0071093854,0.028666103,0.013053105,0.012541572,0.006261076,0.0001722165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000163941,0.000025883866,0.0011898588,0.00017426674,0.0000073727665,0.0019293636,0.73125225,0.000093409915,0.00009529397,0.25828305,0.0011728621,0.0057599554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003948573,0.000016336815,0.001623702,0.00061330607,0.000005011239,0.00042452337,0.9521138,0.00006946335,0.00009180379,0.015699407,0.02932818,0.000010465916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010877315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021999344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025978742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0123923775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007537344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08991337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121471626","doi":"10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105524","title":"South Africa's PNR regime: Privacy and data protection","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computer law & security review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Political science; State (computer science); Data Protection Act 1998; International trade; Business; Geography; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.09049200405618141,"score_gpt":0.34921999666277587,"score_spread":0.25872799260659446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121471626","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072814785,0.2155198,0.0048445547,0.29917398,0.0038568391,0.00063289923,0.0006036688,0.00009161083,0.40246186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5755574,0.13800266,0.010292673,0.1899249,0.0017296954,0.00074084057,0.00026106762,0.000098689,0.083392076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99361706,0.0025180855,0.00051195745,0.0005078542,0.001460346,0.001384745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911498,0.0060372767,0.0010745234,0.00045824828,0.0010116912,0.0002686168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008896807,0.0005085257,0.0005198145,0.0024949897,0.004232114,0.008435662,0.0010650012,0.007375758,0.004989478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015110192,0.0005812922,0.00059276447,0.0030836128,0.0063908184,0.0050059524,0.0038010222,0.0059301304,0.00045696992],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010508315,0.000039999642,0.001299861,0.0028299303,0.000046928824,0.0019568752,0.006791647,0.00026637112,0.002991543,0.8645423,0.040657714,0.078471825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082052284,0.000079869824,0.007781649,0.004746653,0.00009317047,0.0015798466,0.0035594413,0.00014626882,0.0022722275,0.039758936,0.9398276,0.0000723451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03211048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039430138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03211048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00629316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02867462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063847184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121834289","doi":"","title":"The Constitutional Validity of Search and Seizure Powers in SouthAfrican Criminal Procedure","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Search and seizure; Constitution; Criminal procedure; Democracy; Political science; Law; Law enforcement; State (computer science); Criminal investigation; Enforcement; Reasonable suspicion; Business; Politics; Supreme court; Computer science","score_opus":0.018675642200052786,"score_gpt":0.31704513016079783,"score_spread":0.29836948796074503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121834289","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29920918,0.0033964159,0.006594986,0.01446203,0.00027353893,0.00026298332,0.00027642224,0.00008547872,0.67543906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97649854,0.0005624775,0.0019396435,0.0029191456,0.00018210104,0.00031975337,0.00005491321,0.000027792168,0.017495751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856779,0.0040366002,0.0016225132,0.0020044441,0.003421616,0.0032369252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98305595,0.010507145,0.0016240148,0.0023228333,0.0019325402,0.0005575246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012925941,0.00028470624,0.0007506787,0.002478084,0.012572814,0.012770851,0.0013257242,0.0048874114,0.0043649822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023628356,0.0011173253,0.0006963999,0.0021048086,0.030377444,0.00481107,0.005465984,0.0067568487,0.000865953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018256931,0.000009103267,0.00069062214,0.000022767861,0.000006973702,0.00012875976,0.0032383753,0.00011523153,0.00027107872,0.9919315,0.0007004613,0.0028669012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020015649,0.00025355344,0.0215384,0.0010774803,0.0002642401,0.0010127026,0.008668278,0.0030567048,0.0049491236,0.7084106,0.25026235,0.00030645463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06268173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0688303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06268173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010131166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017031806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12463379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122112788","doi":"","title":"Rethinking Volks v. Robinson: The Implcations of Applying a 'Contextualised Choice Model' to Prospective South African Domestic Partnerships Legislation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Sine qua non; General partnership; Jurisprudence; Law; Legislation; Duty; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04079357892956755,"score_gpt":0.3275927431078283,"score_spread":0.2867991641782608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122112788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15291567,0.004732095,0.058306407,0.34509176,0.0015793527,0.00063824764,0.00021898301,0.00013321418,0.4363843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94381976,0.00090654864,0.01067822,0.028968364,0.0001925289,0.00025103966,0.00002311928,0.000041291056,0.015119142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96876734,0.018502256,0.0009470276,0.0023792123,0.006788422,0.0026157873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9727706,0.022369374,0.00084685633,0.001742256,0.0015315237,0.0007393714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037670832,0.0004869208,0.0008985324,0.0011491029,0.005922057,0.010917125,0.0035919384,0.010210861,0.0035409452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0461923,0.00069263147,0.001094896,0.0011497752,0.03681737,0.009770026,0.009089794,0.011692696,0.00038397274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004228236,0.0000031629631,0.000090641595,0.000013753733,0.0000020112498,0.00004562094,0.0029734524,0.0001465064,0.000041176703,0.9949073,0.0007827151,0.0009893923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012979949,0.00012009309,0.0014307298,0.0006703592,0.000054968685,0.00021042571,0.010802253,0.0037696662,0.0008667026,0.8428617,0.13895905,0.00012434587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08295676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11916335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08295676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015446509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025853641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19922483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122459975","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1718950","title":"The Treatment Action Campaign and the Three Dimensions of Lawyering: Reflections from the Rainbow Nation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rainbow; Action (physics); Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Optics; Physics","score_opus":0.03389581036590049,"score_gpt":0.3340466596428461,"score_spread":0.3001508492769456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122459975","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31402305,0.0025901594,0.00058921066,0.58985144,0.0012568281,0.000085406944,0.00004365643,0.000016618744,0.09154356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89769787,0.0012795993,0.00047737945,0.07466177,0.00027474915,0.00009814513,0.000012639546,0.00007190902,0.025425958],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863794,0.007499614,0.0002394659,0.00078291696,0.00088656065,0.004211946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9755509,0.016809996,0.0010196177,0.00064222614,0.00085548393,0.005121745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02344399,0.00034615526,0.0007346394,0.0010306312,0.0425897,0.015555071,0.0024521975,0.013340497,0.0133698275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025873302,0.0007206677,0.00057885423,0.001173022,0.04623504,0.013430017,0.018982042,0.030407676,0.00074254075],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006542083,0.0002380069,0.002861443,0.00009623697,0.000014470203,0.00095321407,0.80853474,0.00004837982,0.00037295185,0.15228282,0.021480562,0.013051751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004031973,0.00007658444,0.0041133147,0.00029186494,0.00001564488,0.00015428416,0.8562366,0.000061978346,0.00027471044,0.017106945,0.12157803,0.00004965564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07540354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21404271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07540354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014180603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031749107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14992929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122490110","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v14i7.6","title":"Analysing the Onus Issue in Dismissals Emanating from the Enforcement of Unilateral Changes to Conditions of Employment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Appeal; Enforcement; Unfair dismissal; Collective bargaining; Compliance (psychology); Legislature; Promotion (chess); Law; Labour law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.018536158317493914,"score_gpt":0.3303078449576757,"score_spread":0.3117716866401818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122490110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6685929,0.004498057,0.0065719625,0.018640662,0.00049092504,0.0001599563,0.000049612816,0.000014333351,0.3009817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985284,0.0007670277,0.00038991016,0.0011652895,0.00021926267,0.000039300947,0.000009857927,0.000008487033,0.012116898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98459756,0.004863992,0.0009922843,0.0008648726,0.004441413,0.004239914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98219,0.011697055,0.0034908652,0.000618281,0.0014790989,0.0005246395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009022198,0.0003334186,0.0005777265,0.0019856659,0.011998246,0.010001934,0.0014967361,0.007832899,0.0046450393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028686794,0.0003832165,0.0006153173,0.0017581175,0.015203727,0.0037679137,0.008476266,0.007057611,0.00047530304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011223232,0.00011708341,0.0150343515,0.00024710066,0.000024240691,0.0051261173,0.043127466,0.001215727,0.0014984347,0.9065454,0.002093093,0.024858762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105740415,0.0007271662,0.19081254,0.0029212157,0.00018195456,0.0046229917,0.2339003,0.0039225915,0.0051232935,0.34638944,0.21085897,0.00043381378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015269866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015269866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008621019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066272896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06255019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122580347","doi":"","title":"Democratizing Review: Justifiability as the Animating Vision of Administrative Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Administrative law; Judicial review; Political science; Legislature; Constitution; Law; Public law; Separation of powers; Rule of law; Public administration; Constitutional law; Politics","score_opus":0.027144312422381665,"score_gpt":0.3966138173109913,"score_spread":0.36946950488860963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122580347","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023266086,0.026849339,0.13464855,0.53031856,0.0021963404,0.0003516367,0.000056569643,0.00024267688,0.28207013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90524465,0.007001992,0.028819708,0.038620476,0.003861916,0.00063121796,0.000033634216,0.00016025067,0.015626105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8703739,0.09719862,0.0043330425,0.0064716996,0.016688643,0.0049340585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80207884,0.15518568,0.01212918,0.01800008,0.0095076775,0.0030985428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10933953,0.0004760058,0.0012033421,0.0043508904,0.010587758,0.022811426,0.0021846313,0.0115011325,0.002635474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14655478,0.0008478836,0.0009455807,0.0030162383,0.08615092,0.02487126,0.008571927,0.012887887,0.00065719563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051305465,0.0000043108957,0.00011101936,0.000029624296,0.000005544682,0.000029186775,0.0017567097,0.00012728518,0.000048917118,0.99357915,0.0012807593,0.0030225213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001977643,0.0000207897,0.00019452296,0.00015497884,0.000007341338,0.00007097419,0.0006633625,0.0003070856,0.00013443266,0.9463014,0.05210812,0.000017270115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003826577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040928093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10933953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011580779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025155118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5782496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123089497","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v16i1.8","title":"Reasonable and Probable Cause in the Law of Malicious Prosecution: A Review of South African and Commonwealth Decisions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Malice; Plaintiff; Warrant; Suspect; Cause of action; Law; Probable cause; Order (exchange); Action (physics); Political science; Reasonable doubt; Officer; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.04659939553475984,"score_gpt":0.3514826152423833,"score_spread":0.30488321970762344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123089497","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042299824,0.96426135,0.00042451735,0.019194033,0.0006925698,0.000028370187,0.000024748457,0.0000048465035,0.011139615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.051026564,0.9399301,0.00056279096,0.0059616435,0.000663741,0.000030435102,0.000017946268,0.0000116091915,0.0017950891],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940513,0.0019842067,0.000979326,0.00034903712,0.0020641095,0.00057196873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9664906,0.026405552,0.0026182903,0.00040591543,0.003396346,0.00068335544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015776467,0.0006891339,0.00082291075,0.013769627,0.003442431,0.0068829693,0.0016851496,0.004344217,0.00274565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03145401,0.00090845546,0.000733482,0.014760658,0.01393355,0.006918952,0.0030758216,0.00477777,0.0005390266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008817979,0.00013303709,0.008851568,0.022916665,0.00011576753,0.0041378075,0.041608207,0.0007767948,0.0011084266,0.32531944,0.068587676,0.5263564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018951032,0.00014053917,0.02483398,0.074455984,0.00015178022,0.0035431592,0.01869874,0.00036949816,0.00061753613,0.03379893,0.84325653,0.00011435161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036379114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07177958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036379114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008795311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029637525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08343494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123133825","doi":"","title":"Tort Lite? - Vancouver (City) V. Ward and the Availability of Damages for Charter Infringements","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Charter; Supreme court; Law; Tort; Causation; Liability; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.024988743164697347,"score_gpt":0.28044682799899723,"score_spread":0.2554580848342999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123133825","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12838511,0.006065093,0.0017146432,0.17573437,0.0006991183,0.000072874944,0.0008967829,0.000059606104,0.6863724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8855657,0.0014767225,0.0005304882,0.03579155,0.00020908557,0.000043651893,0.0001537372,0.000025819592,0.07620327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972253,0.00046195442,0.000075834796,0.0002193321,0.00089956773,0.0011181014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99741167,0.0011223175,0.00020405295,0.0001716426,0.0006624449,0.00042792264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016653602,0.00030372245,0.0004069956,0.0016936114,0.0102682775,0.008941052,0.0014059077,0.009055363,0.009104534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009311239,0.0004256808,0.0003600662,0.0017826724,0.0065634404,0.0026973318,0.0020850562,0.0073293224,0.000827626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008925371,0.000037105812,0.00827428,0.00008485087,0.00003402602,0.0019331898,0.004694116,0.00048691992,0.0005689753,0.87305814,0.09595702,0.014782007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016474628,0.00012219901,0.08476218,0.00091362064,0.00016541852,0.00254015,0.019724056,0.0018049278,0.0023086492,0.23435174,0.65277255,0.00036975797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5925791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.799816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40742087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014723189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011274453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8196405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123444135","doi":"","title":"Adjudication of Social and Economic Rights in South Africa: Beyond the Rhetoric of Illegitimacy and Excessive Complexity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Social rights; Charter; Political science; Human rights; Law; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Constitution; Social equality; Cultural rights; Right to property; State (computer science); Linguistic rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04127155449291715,"score_gpt":0.28347438003571174,"score_spread":0.2422028255427946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123444135","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07802366,0.023540813,0.04198245,0.45192406,0.002776062,0.00044615762,0.00011367338,0.000044881093,0.40114823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89083743,0.008537308,0.013573824,0.0530747,0.0014777597,0.00040141103,0.000038766186,0.00006990548,0.031988967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9729954,0.015841445,0.0014323308,0.0018494244,0.0046728295,0.0032085336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731477,0.021407219,0.0011570556,0.0010694196,0.0025377877,0.0006808394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03884812,0.00071969035,0.00088498107,0.0029326587,0.022656415,0.015184947,0.0022405942,0.011999466,0.0025739316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03864401,0.000681137,0.0007673074,0.002794111,0.066985235,0.013183534,0.012844169,0.017857902,0.00028142676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066102307,0.000004107581,0.00023919287,0.000043925815,0.000005221125,0.0001967029,0.0122583015,0.00009256714,0.0001468627,0.980437,0.002649383,0.003920188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043400094,0.00002050091,0.0011576387,0.0010676851,0.000039535193,0.00023415018,0.01634112,0.00080489664,0.0009185426,0.78582937,0.1934791,0.00006404326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1361309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1749167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1361309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022259323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039182734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27067703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123772538","doi":"10.11575/sppp.v9i0.42564","title":"The False Panacea of City Charters? A Political Perspective on the Case of Toronto","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Politics; Revenue; Power (physics); Public administration; Political science; Nothing; Zoning; Government (linguistics); Local government; Law; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.2960672413520862,"score_gpt":0.6043461652437381,"score_spread":0.3082789238916519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123772538","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08060712,0.009591526,0.0016645663,0.48870844,0.0015399046,0.000060264952,0.0003012222,0.00004300752,0.4174839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87887084,0.003908926,0.0004821809,0.04372704,0.0006537968,0.000052691696,0.00009401734,0.00009611353,0.072114386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922321,0.0021778708,0.00012840104,0.0005447053,0.0012175825,0.0036992515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99545467,0.0016570091,0.0003738742,0.00018451156,0.000798405,0.0015315355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003886693,0.0005530453,0.00047384165,0.0009333653,0.0439331,0.017176958,0.0028159048,0.00906556,0.008805251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065066796,0.00062788423,0.0006067687,0.002302739,0.033212896,0.005301724,0.0044814036,0.013024958,0.0005321961],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013476166,0.000007917562,0.0009747632,0.000035067304,0.0000074199147,0.0008618353,0.045022164,0.00034489806,0.00008173064,0.8902011,0.060680673,0.001768944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029500681,0.000021420099,0.0061358963,0.0003423833,0.000046683686,0.0004959924,0.12390851,0.001431311,0.00026039587,0.041674525,0.8255064,0.00014697907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96239024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9756024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1547206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1547206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06578315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98040426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123870019","doi":"","title":"Precedent, Principle and Pragmatism: Justice Wilson and the Expansion of Canadian Tort Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Political science; Delict; Common law; Sociology; Public law; Private law; Black letter law; Liability","score_opus":0.028227883254181844,"score_gpt":0.2971254760630718,"score_spread":0.26889759280889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123870019","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.096283,0.011622359,0.0053815413,0.29088846,0.00081755983,0.00008085163,0.00011770745,0.000080736594,0.5947277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92074436,0.0029879434,0.002849111,0.020548774,0.00016899485,0.000027029868,0.000026684456,0.00003948886,0.052607644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942041,0.00097656227,0.00011468344,0.00076745317,0.0022837247,0.001653398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957052,0.0015378931,0.0002262805,0.00018481903,0.0015084326,0.0008375115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038195292,0.00037019758,0.00030855625,0.002029058,0.03401707,0.010418333,0.001982714,0.0049719005,0.004107801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009801913,0.00041767457,0.0003391548,0.0021641746,0.04090145,0.004654633,0.0040047835,0.0072947657,0.00024148524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009387646,0.000008063405,0.0007035698,0.000021311655,0.0000032362277,0.00018033254,0.011667038,0.00019248419,0.00011896089,0.9645671,0.014294474,0.008234029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041334417,0.000028049973,0.007675603,0.00035489275,0.00004060996,0.000329821,0.027114805,0.001544415,0.0004602003,0.37865126,0.5835401,0.00021891965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97923136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98932207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12968248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12968248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13179561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94091666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124294062","doi":"","title":"How Could Human Rights Law Be Used by the Courts to Assist Victims of Domestic Violence? A Comparative Study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Domestic violence; Law; Political science; International human rights law; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.0235203374695695,"score_gpt":0.35613866868244304,"score_spread":0.33261833121287354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124294062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8157552,0.013193641,0.0009669217,0.012517563,0.00014643246,0.00010861098,0.000072034425,0.0000063869893,0.15723318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946413,0.0033008899,0.00023656711,0.0005469853,0.000028585215,0.000033126333,0.00001021527,0.0000021472733,0.0012001175],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98980254,0.008379009,0.00017886054,0.00021996048,0.0006480924,0.0007715329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923995,0.005750939,0.0006134603,0.0002683455,0.00076604844,0.0002018422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0092025455,0.00021262607,0.0003343114,0.0027127927,0.0055022193,0.004584229,0.0009191818,0.0025739681,0.003960182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02438534,0.0002370989,0.00021646582,0.003886573,0.008089643,0.0071170367,0.0023741166,0.0015952301,0.00022182486],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002716642,0.000490835,0.021437922,0.0011052464,0.000073659234,0.002851085,0.47977638,0.00040435133,0.0012901248,0.3977643,0.0043041133,0.090230405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008306214,0.0009298218,0.03816134,0.0025204578,0.00011146927,0.0016265827,0.8162037,0.00036171335,0.0010972023,0.017789893,0.1210671,0.000047569836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01604775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028729571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01604775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069399066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031193707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050352752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124915855","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2012/v15i3a2506","title":"The Methodology Used to Interpret Customary Land Tenure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Customary land; Law; Land tenure; Adjudication; Jurisdiction; Common law; Statutory law; Indigenous; Political science; Statutory interpretation; Legislation; Land law; Geography","score_opus":0.048583883940547204,"score_gpt":0.3792018602225298,"score_spread":0.3306179762819826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124915855","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042749878,0.0043146005,0.54439294,0.0102560865,0.0024161434,0.0059828614,0.005463959,0.00032378008,0.3840997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32539907,0.005783207,0.53981304,0.006561743,0.00085526553,0.0123147145,0.0034510288,0.00051718927,0.10530478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9781713,0.009791913,0.0024889861,0.0030267192,0.0055035404,0.0010176498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832191,0.008746978,0.0020594837,0.0018520575,0.0039237924,0.00019859256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016195485,0.00066496263,0.00085789745,0.007945572,0.0047294847,0.007589827,0.002620805,0.0026789438,0.010358336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03137674,0.000589864,0.001297133,0.00986883,0.01392901,0.0049445615,0.003984847,0.0040304367,0.0029348359],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027549975,0.00005587488,0.0053773,0.0005085785,0.000033608656,0.00033101471,0.017044509,0.0005604686,0.0011446859,0.9161065,0.009926054,0.048883803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032307857,0.0001568119,0.012580159,0.0015471689,0.00004180142,0.0010248735,0.015803974,0.002330312,0.0035982225,0.29563332,0.6671375,0.00011360581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013739703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013542509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016195485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006998991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008171356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08565098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125518127","doi":"","title":"Restorative Justice and the Regulatory State in South African Townships","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Context (archaeology); Corporate governance; State (computer science); Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Criminology; Public administration; Cape; Law; Sociology; Geography; Business","score_opus":0.021985107955222193,"score_gpt":0.27237502857519796,"score_spread":0.2503899206199758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125518127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8705851,0.0018983805,0.0008995992,0.015992226,0.00010602401,0.000066028035,0.000018670904,0.000013686123,0.11042026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99436617,0.00036507545,0.000109008084,0.00037847212,0.0000139148815,0.000020853262,0.000003655862,0.0000036988006,0.004739224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958383,0.0020378751,0.00008009831,0.0002387634,0.00030073916,0.0015042953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969631,0.0010123514,0.0007902719,0.00013715628,0.00022539742,0.00087177684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026225059,0.00014234659,0.00022104979,0.0014238281,0.018585484,0.0065711252,0.0011522576,0.0016727813,0.006564691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007378146,0.00040665607,0.00020671928,0.0013861173,0.017391644,0.0025722305,0.0077445325,0.0028076635,0.0001987049],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087183085,0.0002198227,0.024017567,0.00017962455,0.000030520725,0.002794119,0.2800996,0.0007531376,0.0010275594,0.6492556,0.0042249956,0.0373103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074149175,0.00026756784,0.16241395,0.0009060884,0.00005799236,0.001474387,0.5261366,0.0008836899,0.0010202229,0.066306405,0.24035409,0.00010493832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03279287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08263014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03279287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007404791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006758442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065203965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125786627","doi":"10.5430/ijba.v3n4p54","title":"An Examination of the Tenancy Agreement as a Shield in Property Management in Nigeria","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Business Administration","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Leasehold estate; Renting; Business; Landlord; Finance; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.027072426098315738,"score_gpt":0.33730931509313916,"score_spread":0.31023688899482343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125786627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.891055,0.00367601,0.0006586616,0.009816729,0.00017367188,0.000049513383,0.000010602482,0.0000032342684,0.09455651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961933,0.00084039365,0.00013252933,0.00045384225,0.000014627213,0.00000738746,0.0000024784852,0.0000016454202,0.0023538056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778265,0.0012472597,0.0001007234,0.000111398826,0.00032449976,0.00043351948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99532866,0.002505244,0.0012266082,0.00009169282,0.0003971045,0.0004505916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002854747,0.00011381006,0.00016437218,0.00087278703,0.007734356,0.005545232,0.0003838035,0.0011240167,0.0028497293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004246343,0.00020243089,0.00010888798,0.0011153171,0.0074627087,0.003945347,0.0027401468,0.002163037,0.00008543607],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007664629,0.00014269681,0.046357624,0.000454351,0.000009222864,0.0051857596,0.45020816,0.00033146454,0.0018577889,0.45059672,0.0032425823,0.04153695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036526571,0.00009470284,0.05307825,0.0015169792,0.000011120736,0.0008183356,0.83416206,0.00045825512,0.0005494318,0.012378661,0.09690658,0.000021986849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013003484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02923959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013003484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006225076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076330835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045166314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125837551","doi":"","title":"Judicial Discretion in Derivative Actions Under the Companies Act of 2008","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Discretion; Law; Legislature; Judicial discretion; Jurisprudence; Action (physics); Balance (ability); Judicial review; Judicial interpretation; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.026025508154103944,"score_gpt":0.26571524396244245,"score_spread":0.2396897358083385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125837551","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02800875,0.00472997,0.0051570595,0.056823917,0.0008867713,0.00018403807,0.00032521985,0.00014882395,0.9037355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5677918,0.0034274487,0.007283196,0.10779594,0.0010572801,0.00066011475,0.00035603152,0.00011718067,0.311511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97619814,0.005110116,0.0019235441,0.0031870666,0.009153332,0.004427822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907053,0.0054181768,0.0006902639,0.0009560553,0.0018457135,0.00038449783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014567149,0.0004642336,0.0006325566,0.0010015153,0.008198368,0.009107753,0.002395345,0.01748988,0.0057134274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03523003,0.0008586151,0.00070432574,0.0008886779,0.009195679,0.0050388235,0.0055201505,0.013760378,0.0024332856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023264676,0.00002024266,0.00038887485,0.0000442612,0.000004907524,0.00023830072,0.004348292,0.00017254274,0.00052590185,0.9352778,0.050269622,0.008685958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072939285,0.000051187664,0.0021052503,0.0006937977,0.00003871671,0.00036054265,0.0020705585,0.0008320044,0.0014180073,0.11485617,0.87737095,0.00012983738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060123786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07058937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060123786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01211607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027500344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.119547665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130651333","doi":"","title":"Behind the blackboard : reviewing educators' experiences of school violence in South Africa","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Criminologica","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pedagogy; Blackboard (design pattern); Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.140825339625572,"score_gpt":0.37243758653959175,"score_spread":0.23161224691401974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130651333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96945524,0.006983156,0.00019126685,0.013062562,0.00030429987,0.00009356818,0.00006666024,0.000011204131,0.009832049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854338,0.0083852485,0.00028325315,0.0026046664,0.000057240122,0.000068200425,0.000048463196,0.000021821337,0.0030972788],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923109,0.004442315,0.0005938565,0.00027052552,0.0008328162,0.0015497257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736179,0.014355762,0.0049971216,0.00042220898,0.0029154029,0.0036916179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009272025,0.0005114945,0.00074070465,0.0042533167,0.018825717,0.009065377,0.0019408079,0.0026712462,0.0034862957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036398277,0.0008697133,0.00036049896,0.0050233565,0.008165662,0.0058896616,0.01082075,0.0053450502,0.0002598795],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062480212,0.000019632702,0.0067313258,0.00016999787,0.0000049438268,0.00077224686,0.9872665,0.0000067261567,0.000041077623,0.00032630458,0.00080616877,0.0038487401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.45248e-7,0.00000548168,0.0028033433,0.00025664523,0.0000035505373,0.00014919073,0.99273735,0.0000022135616,0.000017411427,0.00002932086,0.003992068,0.0000028156041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06674209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21791959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06674209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010615492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026221037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13270724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131509491","doi":"","title":"A LITTLE LESS TALK AND A LOT MORE ACTION: HOW CAN LAW ENFORCEMENT ENHANCE THE RECRUITMENT OF WOMEN?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Calhoun: The Naval Postgraduate School Institutional Archive (Naval Postgraduate School)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Law enforcement; Action (physics); Law; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06636261195002008,"score_gpt":0.3433367560650181,"score_spread":0.27697414411499804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131509491","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3945996,0.015600245,0.0032934262,0.3900494,0.0019706911,0.0009697127,0.000068687186,0.0000889919,0.19335924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8752266,0.023003647,0.010577105,0.04425299,0.0005856588,0.00095297437,0.000062125735,0.00009148497,0.045247305],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98703533,0.009644768,0.00018852444,0.0003380015,0.0011148945,0.0016785734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98979366,0.0050597675,0.0010708692,0.0002541497,0.0010132692,0.0028082393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017474785,0.00025491454,0.00047922553,0.0012920905,0.010688321,0.007051612,0.001505765,0.0021820643,0.006465765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03110008,0.00034033932,0.00035488248,0.0015799294,0.0045554196,0.0064501916,0.0041685416,0.0021987632,0.0014902906],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017976436,0.0020657857,0.029308414,0.0017764464,0.00004838094,0.00058450876,0.29684493,0.00013118671,0.0010500384,0.036618102,0.046726152,0.5846664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001149735,0.0009677554,0.05039499,0.005907883,0.00009068174,0.0003023858,0.61638576,0.0003332645,0.0012542906,0.014598641,0.30958512,0.00006431157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015750684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03850472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017474785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052174595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028378837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092416584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132853333","doi":"10.47348/sacj/v33/i3a5","title":"Revising spousal testimonial privilege and marital communications privilege in South African criminal procedure: Is abolition or extension the answer? Part 2","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Privilege (computing); Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Sociology; Criminology; History; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.07818039969400453,"score_gpt":0.33598407691269494,"score_spread":0.2578036772186904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132853333","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18626587,0.14521866,0.012323569,0.46442485,0.0045935255,0.00038725548,0.00015968873,0.000019436247,0.18660711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9034351,0.04659279,0.002388608,0.037437946,0.0023577716,0.00015602037,0.00004379317,0.000014549794,0.007573561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99300086,0.00296453,0.0006727288,0.0005402222,0.0015826356,0.0012389477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9715379,0.021109674,0.0033704927,0.0007204912,0.0024504,0.0008110572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010310752,0.00031515944,0.0005186435,0.002212803,0.005285915,0.0075845555,0.0015446551,0.0064795953,0.004257572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04149691,0.0004802281,0.00064293976,0.0016645241,0.025176845,0.008447863,0.007481066,0.010382806,0.00023527352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060045462,0.00009725356,0.012778712,0.0011229898,0.000038592818,0.0017460267,0.037339102,0.00061824877,0.00052227615,0.856092,0.0117061315,0.07787858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053318916,0.00018923219,0.057257734,0.018483587,0.00028971897,0.0041313213,0.09470206,0.0020145306,0.001654073,0.45314714,0.36781815,0.00025913093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0756815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11862168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0756815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012328864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03208964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.150482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133168691","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1409","title":"A Pipeline Story: The Evolving Autonomy of Canadian Municipalities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Legislature; Statutory law; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Political science; Autonomy; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Law; Business; Geography","score_opus":0.04232552655796398,"score_gpt":0.33370421449100807,"score_spread":0.2913786879330441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133168691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41091204,0.00580757,0.0017066468,0.24775362,0.00050018093,0.00009011593,0.00079426303,0.000080470614,0.33235502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95999485,0.0017992822,0.00055532285,0.009554121,0.00004711955,0.000021498594,0.000103062346,0.000028338336,0.027896332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99372333,0.00069139217,0.00009534003,0.00053262216,0.002020888,0.0029362848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99332035,0.0015171752,0.00029682054,0.00019347481,0.0026907865,0.0019813462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003485234,0.00027844214,0.00040496048,0.0022637083,0.058245238,0.012193242,0.0021828036,0.0042581502,0.005825215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010448369,0.00043030106,0.00041630754,0.004651027,0.017052917,0.003682053,0.0050488,0.005768251,0.0002334626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008521231,0.000031985106,0.014137644,0.00010462199,0.000025783907,0.0014161682,0.14303075,0.0007695836,0.000633355,0.7487666,0.06288737,0.028110977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025963662,0.000024194243,0.029013649,0.00028904338,0.000043802007,0.00026283687,0.18036696,0.0009310577,0.00047170097,0.0253406,0.7630215,0.00020875398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99761105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7563052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24369478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26617128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87720686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135940413","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2020/v23i0a8150","title":"State Use Provisions for Patent Law, and Expropriations: Some Comparative Law Guidelines for South Africa during the Covid-19 Crisis and Beyond","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Remuneration; Government (linguistics); TRIPS Agreement; State (computer science); TRIPS architecture; Intellectual property; Patent Act; Business; Patent infringement; Political science; Patent law; Engineering","score_opus":0.13350417912541174,"score_gpt":0.3603051737450357,"score_spread":0.22680099461962394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135940413","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03381925,0.12677419,0.0202227,0.15024914,0.0021135698,0.0011989516,0.0007943434,0.00022293457,0.66460496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59504503,0.1387213,0.058511414,0.0552281,0.0027368504,0.0031205255,0.0011369593,0.0009566855,0.1445431],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98542064,0.0063438187,0.0015906952,0.0010840965,0.0031680474,0.0023926978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.971017,0.022133831,0.0015534069,0.0011563723,0.0036123802,0.0005270315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028051723,0.0013771206,0.0015948412,0.011552882,0.014838478,0.029682614,0.004084437,0.021247689,0.012168083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047517583,0.0017752092,0.0016080353,0.012667442,0.023752563,0.03594706,0.009205233,0.017873466,0.001671452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001801032,0.00004358271,0.00022091373,0.00030063067,0.0000040669775,0.00041643353,0.0153765045,0.00023103347,0.0003474732,0.9592109,0.0079786405,0.015851788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058804035,0.00013880651,0.0038892052,0.0059101507,0.000052119456,0.0005099406,0.040761195,0.00085571565,0.0011490829,0.24392346,0.7025745,0.00017711177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1020422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11898192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1020422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033724975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039653055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24469298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137763280","doi":"","title":"The Universality of the Human Condition: Theorizing Transportation Inequality Claims by Persons with Disabilities in Canada, 1976 – 2016","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Sociology; Doctrine; Disability studies; Human rights; Inequality; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.009692718577204665,"score_gpt":0.27246921987263095,"score_spread":0.2627765012954263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137763280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5262616,0.013217069,0.004643819,0.109524354,0.00043732525,0.00016397476,0.00042277994,0.000022193159,0.34530684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98536265,0.003794877,0.0006512584,0.0019296849,0.000034580502,0.000034988927,0.00006309038,0.000010333766,0.008118646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997416,0.0003368398,0.00007270805,0.0002183182,0.00077026593,0.0011858667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99638796,0.0015318438,0.00022278547,0.00010671895,0.0012415635,0.00050912664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032714738,0.0003862517,0.00040341078,0.0034864913,0.033693615,0.007083039,0.0023678073,0.0035442326,0.0034024476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010449445,0.00031716842,0.00045978426,0.0042345882,0.028874516,0.003973281,0.00608422,0.007374651,0.00011767454],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012757499,0.000023840215,0.0077682403,0.00004471085,0.000008444898,0.00039202452,0.17851679,0.0008201338,0.000069300324,0.7955195,0.0047508227,0.012073427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002484818,0.00002857527,0.06006155,0.0014456639,0.000087279615,0.0003766273,0.4913128,0.0041895933,0.00042649347,0.22198111,0.21991083,0.00015465038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99465525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99537885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19868986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19868986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18988834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92940617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139205488","doi":"10.21991/cf29411","title":"Toronto's 2018 Municipal Election, Rights of Democratic Participation, and Section 2(b) of the Charter","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Public administration; Political science; Democracy; Government (linguistics); Representation (politics); Local government; General election; Section (typography); Law; Business; Politics; Advertising","score_opus":0.015306788955929419,"score_gpt":0.2880664323400087,"score_spread":0.2727596433840793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139205488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04026848,0.0033091514,0.0018699807,0.06816249,0.009954649,0.0008160336,0.0118259145,0.0005560881,0.86323726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23292388,0.0011653393,0.0023317556,0.009564651,0.0013980017,0.0005113095,0.003780495,0.00018181762,0.7481427],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954353,0.0003263106,0.00018609133,0.00032185728,0.002137933,0.0015924926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99718577,0.00032126182,0.0002365786,0.00019616722,0.001035762,0.0010244782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002079944,0.00047560284,0.00031949405,0.0009480801,0.008878251,0.0059148697,0.0011392252,0.004155409,0.018614857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068207597,0.0004420549,0.00027146115,0.0011580868,0.0041760365,0.0010626004,0.0022481605,0.004878815,0.0031089436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059341182,0.000016150268,0.0011440538,0.000058512956,0.000003322476,0.00039671728,0.0051933927,0.000103330814,0.00036134807,0.24553981,0.73849475,0.008629267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012663532,0.000006692811,0.0047343257,0.000034426073,0.0000019921156,0.000034932706,0.0005984457,0.000032168842,0.00014892394,0.0010329318,0.99334735,0.000015207302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.867139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9468108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13286102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038395163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059089433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27857774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3141701539","doi":"10.1017/9781108283618","title":"Remedies for Human Rights Violations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Damages; Political science; Jurisprudence; Harm; Law; International human rights law; Discretion; Interim; Proportionality (law); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03923995706868449,"score_gpt":0.2819543061799168,"score_spread":0.2427143491112323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3141701539","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00092309684,0.021346271,0.008078576,0.015505784,0.004894283,0.00017466562,0.0001013855,0.00029644574,0.94867945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029243423,0.011061444,0.0047158436,0.011019243,0.001130798,0.00015835125,0.00011625555,0.0001378694,0.9424168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982363,0.00040419964,0.00007517396,0.0001687259,0.0009734836,0.0001420453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905723,0.00046300286,0.00006978627,0.00011488881,0.00024442925,0.000050673654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012255949,0.00062112696,0.0004182302,0.0010340736,0.0022135845,0.0038219683,0.0010777029,0.003866725,0.028960561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004602528,0.0002688912,0.00049190916,0.00069916196,0.0038533933,0.0036316982,0.001845099,0.0048287613,0.008140325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000938639,0.000052438525,0.00007671217,0.00023471011,0.0000066882585,0.00013970223,0.0008261761,0.00065412273,0.0004791583,0.4895273,0.41048717,0.09750648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007265204,0.00001691235,0.00018513015,0.0003075847,0.0000059384297,0.00015507019,0.00024599265,0.0002625322,0.0003046772,0.06362379,0.9348734,0.000011755155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038777625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008134125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028960561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023335668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052847518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0968827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3141998102","doi":"10.29173/mlj1020","title":"Section 24(2) of the Charter; Exploring the Role of Police Conduct in the Grant Analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Charter; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.0718746993278118,"score_gpt":0.3069453242783958,"score_spread":0.235070624950584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3141998102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04888673,0.006650605,0.027872777,0.11169454,0.001939865,0.00084406603,0.0004138901,0.00013339409,0.8015643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84562486,0.0043543107,0.020362075,0.01675742,0.00069388584,0.0007232828,0.00012430138,0.00012370336,0.11123614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95395684,0.016070042,0.001395404,0.0024100223,0.020103503,0.0060642497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.962255,0.021946058,0.0015261207,0.00197055,0.010261697,0.0020406002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031514674,0.0005421847,0.0006002752,0.0032103502,0.019168193,0.015864147,0.0030581728,0.0074469205,0.002713416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05099205,0.0005814318,0.000643681,0.0033927197,0.046723574,0.0040370747,0.006554676,0.008651283,0.00058489764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058085657,0.0000067677493,0.00070072664,0.000029946348,0.000002247789,0.00014672497,0.011316141,0.00020635726,0.00012029644,0.9753357,0.00747937,0.0046499316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028593035,0.000066398876,0.0062272134,0.00090632646,0.000049419414,0.00033141626,0.036754053,0.0010053089,0.0012773593,0.29241815,0.66071874,0.00021701162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79092485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8029876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20907515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04934658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23191755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42061287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3143269603","doi":"10.5539/ass.v17n4p35","title":"The Legitimacy of the Public-Sector Employee’s Strike in the Jordanian Legislation: A Study Case","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislator; Public sector; Legislation; Legitimacy; Private sector; Sovereignty; Law; State (computer science); Public administration; Political science; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.04109033316577105,"score_gpt":0.3467466323789308,"score_spread":0.30565629921315973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3143269603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77865165,0.0022232195,0.0017760552,0.023359446,0.00020808482,0.00018403413,0.000040586434,0.0000140512,0.19354293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97339535,0.00090041466,0.0006196651,0.0039697746,0.00011515561,0.00006301083,0.00001183022,0.000010977599,0.020913977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99371946,0.0033554565,0.00018529744,0.00048485998,0.00078763004,0.0014673625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99201924,0.0046494515,0.0010244198,0.00032087576,0.0011398948,0.0008460487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009224859,0.0004370229,0.00054168934,0.0015211826,0.030507175,0.011620116,0.0026848644,0.010693606,0.010428268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009603282,0.0005551203,0.00047430283,0.0017374909,0.016276857,0.0049621207,0.006508763,0.0073940284,0.0008819809],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009880503,0.0004406847,0.014322515,0.00024103158,0.000022485003,0.03524943,0.34452704,0.00034919623,0.00071878725,0.58012694,0.01029907,0.0136040365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006708465,0.00020817848,0.008122494,0.00091748865,0.000053729942,0.006819098,0.7148471,0.0011679633,0.0013507828,0.025390398,0.24099545,0.000060286573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026287047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056452252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030507175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010844288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010035281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07868123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W314685758","doi":"","title":"Anti-Spam: A Comparative Appraisal of Canadian, European Union, and South African Regulatory Regimes: Lex Informatica Conference, 21st-23rd May 2008 Pretoria, South Africa","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of information, law and technology","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Forum spam; Spamming; Spambot; Legislature; The Internet; Jurisdiction; European union; Cyberspace; Political science; Business; Advertising; Law; Computer science; International trade; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.020198345302985768,"score_gpt":0.26684578276076093,"score_spread":0.24664743745777518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W314685758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3155213,0.27360407,0.0006790361,0.042840946,0.0007480629,0.0006158182,0.0019193594,0.0000753591,0.3639961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8700053,0.10553385,0.0006958943,0.0040863836,0.00027324425,0.00020163185,0.00060188194,0.000032581225,0.018569099],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993572,0.0012006724,0.00021250501,0.00024246532,0.003301054,0.0014713526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819177,0.008990401,0.002244546,0.00021312034,0.00567024,0.000964058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009705814,0.00037813705,0.0006841824,0.016619623,0.0077144667,0.009682375,0.001045233,0.001853983,0.011696818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017485252,0.00035020415,0.00038242806,0.031081727,0.0063599627,0.0028781963,0.0016305184,0.0012663713,0.00054529664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007174196,0.00029441857,0.058582447,0.014168943,0.0001427503,0.0007504331,0.14466171,0.0005663351,0.0010196097,0.2516723,0.100511014,0.4269127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063855885,0.000198728,0.32409486,0.010340734,0.00021913569,0.00034773632,0.1841221,0.00024562262,0.0006263132,0.003864704,0.47578612,0.00009009247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5612781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74819297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4387219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051402282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06695064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8826112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3148539756","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199692552.001.0001","title":"The Negligence Liability of Public Authorities, Second Edition","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Variety (cybernetics); Scope (computer science); Political science; Reputation; Legal liability; Law; Tort; Business","score_opus":0.039539422012797455,"score_gpt":0.3091166999051831,"score_spread":0.2695772778923856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3148539756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010383258,0.068068944,0.0026021104,0.014998652,0.017529555,0.00008446241,0.000546839,0.00016365176,0.89496756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014859019,0.030405095,0.0011918709,0.0059439903,0.004873848,0.00009984972,0.0004999042,0.00009611103,0.94203025],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993344,0.00008521566,0.000038395134,0.00006608699,0.0004205525,0.00005540754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991197,0.00038529537,0.000049553342,0.00006569229,0.00032333613,0.000056369394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005598518,0.00080481917,0.00044366,0.0022577923,0.0015664308,0.0036314463,0.0006751202,0.002098123,0.015941482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022160523,0.00041015842,0.0004179613,0.0015058574,0.002452272,0.0024241414,0.0011274731,0.0034961812,0.006799548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000086464,0.00003141445,0.00010675094,0.00014038544,0.0000018668254,0.00013784511,0.0003499372,0.000565763,0.00020098299,0.10944883,0.8475435,0.041464016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002275142,0.000011429484,0.00042646777,0.000324644,0.000001448599,0.00015610972,0.00010990219,0.00017392394,0.00007419289,0.015413246,0.98330045,0.0000058097903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019194778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026082758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019194778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051939785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054543396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053329527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3150226060","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1405","title":"The Better Local Government Act versus Municipal Democracy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Local government; Democracy; Public administration; Political science; Business; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.029564945102533626,"score_gpt":0.35098515828569643,"score_spread":0.32142021318316283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3150226060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015930846,0.009458685,0.0018401559,0.17328179,0.0012497472,0.000030958807,0.00029503473,0.000098347205,0.79781455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7384705,0.0038341237,0.0008208365,0.047016766,0.0014355577,0.00010752122,0.00019935885,0.00014082219,0.20797464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99157554,0.004152023,0.00031251466,0.00074815424,0.0014061383,0.0018056154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956943,0.0011997914,0.00054570823,0.0008662856,0.00082234043,0.00087157666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004093089,0.0003397849,0.00048328118,0.0010237064,0.0072523407,0.010922858,0.0010024193,0.00514095,0.018971734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009136423,0.00020503152,0.00033238714,0.0022378955,0.017384728,0.006370126,0.005252803,0.0058529954,0.0030118634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000106633215,0.000006550039,0.00044016252,0.000023509845,0.0000022318477,0.00003402488,0.0023025463,0.000069441674,0.000018494104,0.9657229,0.02678237,0.0045870584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026156908,0.000028879205,0.0028589491,0.0002974277,0.000015975083,0.00006495201,0.007218676,0.00020560721,0.000096178956,0.109068125,0.8800933,0.000025857693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20504402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33559015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20504402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018462203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016928175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40770108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151230307","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1410","title":"With Great(er) Power Comes Great(er) Responsibility: Indigenous Rights and Municipal Autonomy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Constitution; Indigenous rights; Autonomy; Political science; Jurisprudence; Legislature; Democracy; Public administration; Law; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Local government; Empowerment; Sociology; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.02316959477108585,"score_gpt":0.3310868733339203,"score_spread":0.30791727856283446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3151230307","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21609297,0.0046611694,0.003928077,0.06906833,0.00021169418,0.000030236393,0.000047103687,0.000023892737,0.7059365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839811,0.00062268286,0.00028271042,0.00081039546,0.000033558943,0.0000064282003,0.0000057565,0.000004827773,0.014252578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718297,0.00092399126,0.00005505643,0.00016783361,0.0005748392,0.0010953743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984907,0.0005866974,0.00015905514,0.0001072604,0.00027366923,0.0003826941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019149609,0.00013102955,0.00016635477,0.0005508757,0.009720445,0.005427924,0.0006606467,0.0014846793,0.002719658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032190124,0.00012403632,0.00017500929,0.0006930616,0.036804438,0.0031640832,0.0046840957,0.0016369785,0.00015542205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035074086,0.0000030865283,0.0008981848,0.000014311734,0.000001595412,0.00015965567,0.049068652,0.000106272084,0.00009109972,0.9453461,0.0013947956,0.002912787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015810989,0.00002781974,0.017905619,0.00033875607,0.000025706464,0.0003319791,0.21622215,0.00046513224,0.00068004616,0.32378963,0.440136,0.00006132609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6260802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7942104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6260802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024077043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028893437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75224376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155307953","doi":"10.29173/mlj1016","title":"In the Aftermath of R v Pham: A Comment on Certainty of Removal and Mitigation of Sentences","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ontario Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Philosophy; Linguistics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.024547187069918663,"score_gpt":0.3142020781336466,"score_spread":0.28965489106372794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155307953","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27187636,0.028824503,0.0033843922,0.63908917,0.008031859,0.00013409,0.00044419573,0.00018161385,0.048033793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76617444,0.0067834374,0.0014070757,0.2108624,0.0032256022,0.00010736156,0.00009933563,0.000064485306,0.011275891],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98117036,0.006585921,0.0027856801,0.0017752445,0.0049039563,0.0027788528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8898061,0.09407021,0.0068132826,0.001631784,0.006794349,0.0008842811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035166454,0.00029140702,0.0006234284,0.0014229917,0.008860707,0.0036635885,0.0026878843,0.013183199,0.0014908584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.093729876,0.00071436836,0.0011218431,0.0016819214,0.008580389,0.0027349098,0.0028702249,0.013660228,0.00038596094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042207274,0.00007069436,0.03919379,0.0031909072,0.00024549206,0.037979722,0.2116396,0.0016595457,0.008398042,0.26355052,0.36147982,0.07216981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007948503,0.00044435795,0.10547678,0.0044269753,0.00052051677,0.006959903,0.11699159,0.00084542617,0.013158046,0.016372783,0.73430234,0.00042175894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09164105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13256103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90835893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068939133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021680199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1859802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157906344","doi":"10.25159/2522-3062/5307","title":"The Canadian Courts’ Approach to the ‘Duty to Consult’ Indigenous Peoples: A Comparative Overview","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Duty; Law; Supreme court; Obligation; Political science; Convention; State (computer science); Notice; Ceremony; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.10975294987985741,"score_gpt":0.35698417075444955,"score_spread":0.24723122087459215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157906344","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048649553,0.14370796,0.0012523584,0.055346936,0.0011361804,0.00007578441,0.00045561674,0.000040412186,0.7493352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7548833,0.16917409,0.0016754468,0.01329616,0.00052890135,0.00006955397,0.00028840773,0.00008517998,0.059999086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859638,0.0016447041,0.00030859635,0.00087489147,0.0073271403,0.0038807706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896125,0.0024211193,0.00049088395,0.00025296194,0.006149626,0.0010729255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051008803,0.0006744032,0.00070822623,0.0090900995,0.03967248,0.013982844,0.0031052995,0.004966586,0.0068338513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010747779,0.00066217565,0.0007046736,0.021196928,0.021629537,0.004113481,0.0035495006,0.0058045844,0.00043558364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030315268,0.000035396606,0.0043395185,0.00064371893,0.00003309313,0.00074755173,0.05655898,0.0003742246,0.00025407414,0.8394842,0.05530637,0.042192575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009809181,0.000030939682,0.030866306,0.0014541985,0.000076105985,0.00058065896,0.05163762,0.0003690302,0.00022670729,0.013668855,0.90093356,0.00014609777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99779737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25816697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25816697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25465408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8604212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159161535","doi":"","title":"Violence conjugale et droit de la famille : la méconnue ordonnance de protection (Domestic Violence and Family Law: The Overlooked Protection Order)","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Political science; Law; Humanities; Legislature; Self defense; Poison control; Sociology; Suicide prevention; Art; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.011829912185277243,"score_gpt":0.2712061632539304,"score_spread":0.25937625106865314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159161535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47057956,0.051021345,0.007855729,0.08621388,0.0006660902,0.00007246601,0.00031168447,0.000036157115,0.3832431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863003,0.0040528257,0.0006039547,0.0006736732,0.00015999707,0.000012520255,0.000020873054,0.000007064843,0.008168874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841714,0.0006689133,0.00007261934,0.00018238662,0.00028455464,0.0003743944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957695,0.0024858979,0.00088575564,0.0001776902,0.00047648422,0.00020473445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017657494,0.00024073098,0.0002034941,0.0015831332,0.0030531394,0.0049891863,0.00044729817,0.0018157803,0.005918016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006375796,0.00021792932,0.00019654982,0.0013715567,0.009933825,0.0033586943,0.0017510485,0.0021834653,0.00031886113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043597553,0.000030856885,0.013364671,0.00015781699,0.000010942663,0.001204807,0.030510277,0.00032156892,0.0003586389,0.9116718,0.004995735,0.037329216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039563463,0.00022601984,0.2546057,0.0022791196,0.00005197009,0.004547287,0.07979966,0.0018841726,0.001458044,0.2717159,0.38328975,0.000102869584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.076066695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.077219024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076066695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067461245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039879065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15124792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163784926","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190075774.003.0010","title":"The Republic of South Africa","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Political science; Law; Democracy; Bill of rights; Constitutional court; Judicial review; German; Power (physics); Constitutional review; History; Politics","score_opus":0.04414709120188668,"score_gpt":0.28768565929733414,"score_spread":0.24353856809544747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163784926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027877556,0.021868201,0.0003242922,0.0040853852,0.00087465387,0.000074601856,0.000639658,0.000076652344,0.96926874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04192652,0.020008735,0.0009751797,0.0013058048,0.00020209468,0.00012351468,0.00042875958,0.00012376276,0.9349057],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998722,0.000017048758,0.0000067365872,0.00002833554,0.00004131578,0.00003417925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99992585,0.000014852012,0.000010461093,0.000008424791,0.000025596888,0.000014691683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013990277,0.00041027338,0.00018437748,0.0008751787,0.0016348065,0.0025309343,0.00029282013,0.00063956797,0.10940237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003924095,0.00015659872,0.00013231195,0.001517343,0.0006527415,0.00095419923,0.0010658036,0.0009273271,0.021554818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033637192,0.00001783841,0.0005849149,0.0010598473,0.000009349097,0.0013630926,0.003442665,0.0002456013,0.0029224975,0.3021589,0.36743134,0.32073033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011566258,0.0000012557294,0.0002491935,0.00007928954,6.2399573e-7,0.00013650574,0.00014039635,0.000008330525,0.00006919273,0.00096865825,0.9983443,0.0000010959468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012800342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022671333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10940237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018790897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023323414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36598742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165357967","doi":"","title":"Misconduct relating to fraud and corruption in the public service","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Language change; Corporate governance; Abuse of power; Good governance; Political science; Independence (probability theory); Democracy; Power (physics); Law; Public administration; Business; Politics; Finance","score_opus":0.05881110559674418,"score_gpt":0.329420973543528,"score_spread":0.2706098679467838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165357967","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3389203,0.032298192,0.0028360374,0.5080095,0.0030136877,0.00018842527,0.000059620335,0.00006239024,0.114611834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9308839,0.011977209,0.00060121465,0.042475224,0.0008974578,0.000057609148,0.000022906901,0.000031413147,0.013053136],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95681274,0.027524304,0.00164876,0.0012127312,0.0072109825,0.0055904724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93814653,0.0389513,0.011521572,0.0029771894,0.003875911,0.0045275674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029420093,0.0003971811,0.0005483208,0.002361819,0.034474153,0.014281799,0.0021695585,0.010106937,0.006998677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05169248,0.0006478797,0.0006186468,0.0034962178,0.027410183,0.011416934,0.014809377,0.013237936,0.00092873466],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005851881,0.00017207328,0.023110965,0.00058649294,0.0000326137,0.015345294,0.64918584,0.00024084617,0.0005347672,0.18517773,0.05042908,0.07512579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015695552,0.00015361654,0.012059067,0.0028568017,0.000030316525,0.015992083,0.47084758,0.00046044678,0.0009126102,0.034563906,0.46200746,0.00010052048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014779372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020002596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034474153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013255038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025197212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15559018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167603032","doi":"10.25159/2522-6800/7124","title":"Prosecutorial Discretion and Judicial Review: An Analysis of Recent Canadian and South African Decisions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Southern African Public Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Judicial review; Appeal; Political science; Scrutiny; Judicial discretion; Principle of legality; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Discretion; Judicial activism","score_opus":0.035878895317085775,"score_gpt":0.3093612923735879,"score_spread":0.2734823970565021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167603032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7336101,0.041960467,0.00057983975,0.054035857,0.0002660475,0.0003522903,0.0015718981,0.000032538253,0.16759104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95469695,0.020116063,0.00073195127,0.0059155924,0.00014213278,0.00007548903,0.00032981925,0.000033387765,0.017958716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854047,0.0014007032,0.0005587634,0.001035293,0.0069857454,0.0046147383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94262147,0.021581575,0.0068780854,0.0009246693,0.023179485,0.004814627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009144646,0.00034629917,0.0005150889,0.012432284,0.021593148,0.008364495,0.0029039462,0.0037435158,0.005021419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048935257,0.0006454819,0.0006892584,0.023818053,0.006269383,0.0019352278,0.002152704,0.004180552,0.0002581624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069054146,0.00033030935,0.1577077,0.002062092,0.00027138423,0.005670278,0.23309596,0.0028090167,0.0017212261,0.38200775,0.07194551,0.14168826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013567154,0.000106388914,0.5234637,0.0017705802,0.00028762344,0.0013777245,0.07554204,0.0017310771,0.00096493826,0.006936718,0.38718146,0.0005020949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9902623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18962428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18962428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17789686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93992096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168065586","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a7662","title":"Editorial: Determining the Content of Indigenous Law with Special Reference to Recording of the Law - Continental Views","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Diversity (politics); Political science; Cape; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.022941763180475437,"score_gpt":0.2918479840411488,"score_spread":0.2689062208606734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168065586","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000042158757,0.0017483137,0.0000629106,0.027664207,0.9668615,0.000021453772,0.000073941825,0.00003829614,0.003487321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007248773,0.0025004107,0.0000919054,0.011321312,0.96550834,0.000031036227,0.00006216288,0.000068593916,0.01969122],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904795,0.0015051108,0.00095949427,0.00088949694,0.0055622836,0.00060409895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9646224,0.0146522755,0.0018075365,0.0009316893,0.014921466,0.0030646175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007380825,0.0033275099,0.0031374448,0.0072817835,0.008085446,0.012568705,0.0033155696,0.011844668,0.024783341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034100536,0.00096261513,0.0020033314,0.0035342535,0.004459823,0.0057131564,0.0024341643,0.014609711,0.012932148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008399786,0.00000671471,0.000016390226,0.00008141301,0.00000398112,0.00004789476,0.000032690274,0.00001041102,0.000027694576,0.00028404174,0.9974305,0.0020498612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002088582,0.000013583082,0.00033345268,0.0006514394,0.000019914625,0.000106485226,0.00018399295,0.00009332261,0.000088931534,0.0011288447,0.9973424,0.000016669503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007296624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017569548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024783341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006638647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077326545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08290857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171212085","doi":"10.1177/09646639211022786","title":"Settler Colonialism and the South African TRC: Ambivalent Denial and Democratisation Without Decolonisation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Decolonization; Denial; Democratization; Scholarship; Gender studies; Ambivalence; Sociology; Political science; History; Politics; Law; Democracy; Psychology; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.03660394011820325,"score_gpt":0.3507990178362136,"score_spread":0.31419507771801036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171212085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6764823,0.0026833774,0.002670541,0.029662482,0.00014572326,0.00006271551,0.000022334963,0.000014401378,0.2882561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99791604,0.00021780757,0.00015904702,0.00033031547,0.000010483086,0.000007469701,0.000002576103,0.0000027073672,0.0013535838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99590224,0.0019409492,0.00020152684,0.00031396633,0.00072548864,0.0009158538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99402,0.0028068356,0.0014602264,0.00066049997,0.0005488784,0.00050363253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047004153,0.00019099866,0.00024328528,0.0013130816,0.0083162105,0.005348172,0.0005781515,0.0014911771,0.0026395079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010958192,0.00019117176,0.00023439492,0.0015813231,0.046016693,0.0039460477,0.008136907,0.0045134164,0.00012757827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016440048,0.000024292021,0.0036462606,0.00006653497,0.0000055855503,0.00041910508,0.12361557,0.000085604435,0.00033265236,0.86196333,0.00071029924,0.009114349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052812724,0.00011031666,0.049521793,0.0009838588,0.0000369926,0.002469739,0.28211173,0.00086990505,0.0015572023,0.48148584,0.1807061,0.00009367847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012466631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019927898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012466631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068510836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056344634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049708247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173401672","doi":"10.18820/24150517/jjs44.i2.02","title":"Reconsidering the “pay now, argue later” approach of South Africa in relation to disputed taxes – lessons from Canada and Australia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Relation (database); Enforcement; Revenue; Service (business); Political science; Internal revenue; Law; Sociology; Economics; History; Economy; Archaeology; Finance","score_opus":0.04987300977789767,"score_gpt":0.2404725915238684,"score_spread":0.19059958174597075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173401672","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22072129,0.012061189,0.0037399887,0.3175794,0.000669062,0.0001740753,0.00011091026,0.000021938326,0.44492218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96384877,0.0033636682,0.0014796978,0.012046947,0.00006741864,0.0000537042,0.00001702355,0.0000467018,0.019076116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884129,0.0044103703,0.00032594844,0.0007516605,0.0021532087,0.0039459346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892235,0.005091002,0.00049504533,0.00044241833,0.002822797,0.001925286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014176231,0.00044042632,0.00073679216,0.0032072482,0.042149886,0.021773329,0.0033172213,0.006689565,0.00729161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025753513,0.0005648607,0.0006262312,0.0039845556,0.058306452,0.011172288,0.0099476455,0.014588713,0.00041264133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027292073,0.000021274598,0.00224681,0.00009053201,0.000013512696,0.0007571093,0.1535014,0.00020658362,0.00022235655,0.82558197,0.005783284,0.011547903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004572314,0.000033422904,0.011571116,0.0017830938,0.00005773082,0.0005951076,0.47888574,0.00076087075,0.0005617829,0.19333048,0.31224194,0.00013301961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93351656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96948034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10196687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10196687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18073379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7398249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175924501","doi":"","title":"Locating the Woman: A Note on Customary Law and the Utility of Real Property in the Swaziland Context","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Land law; Property law; Property (philosophy); Political science; Law; Real property; Property rights; Cultural property; Common law; Corporate governance; Land tenure; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography; Business; Cultural heritage","score_opus":0.011313079288811534,"score_gpt":0.2797180075449119,"score_spread":0.26840492825610035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175924501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6898397,0.009444627,0.003574277,0.048738524,0.00042116156,0.00005703992,0.000042790405,0.000020844835,0.24786119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98153895,0.0022324054,0.00043314707,0.0012927005,0.000035195993,0.000019354426,0.0000058579367,0.000013734661,0.01442856],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982173,0.0011406881,0.000032707485,0.000116611285,0.00013661795,0.0003561013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991462,0.0005983567,0.00007901951,0.00003419146,0.000060258943,0.00008203442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021344859,0.0003587532,0.00041593862,0.0011090592,0.018907145,0.0063984133,0.0008399596,0.002135721,0.00637341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027400036,0.00037871586,0.00017045507,0.0012194401,0.02871809,0.006088033,0.005545897,0.0031793131,0.0005798797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000113113565,0.00001154981,0.0012064124,0.000054491844,0.0000018799639,0.0013150506,0.8653995,0.000018510287,0.0004887828,0.12667263,0.0009454779,0.0038744006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027088847,0.00002222971,0.0016990402,0.0002843436,0.0000044970193,0.0006504927,0.8860118,0.00004482096,0.0003038124,0.0067806332,0.104186565,0.000009038653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054388218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09665001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054388218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065251724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038812878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10814333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176221380","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3109060","title":"Nigeria's Federation Account As a Subject of a Garnishee Order - A Review of CBN v Obla Ubana &amp; Ors (2016)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Order (exchange); Political science; Economics; Library science; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.05342914084251092,"score_gpt":0.40920009996330303,"score_spread":0.3557709591207921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176221380","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005068976,0.9105187,0.00015207275,0.0145509895,0.0020260399,0.00006580736,0.00014584025,0.000010133761,0.06746139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.099874504,0.86318654,0.00092592917,0.009515252,0.00071876554,0.00007880641,0.00016005374,0.000015758427,0.025524454],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986953,0.00032408556,0.00018637931,0.00009910461,0.00053598895,0.00015907909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800223,0.0010477656,0.0004116042,0.000060376275,0.00038465235,0.00009334821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026629092,0.00038337658,0.00054764317,0.002547045,0.003445734,0.0046824114,0.00072724954,0.002969334,0.0055337106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065489686,0.0003049463,0.00027088975,0.0033036075,0.0022886295,0.0035527912,0.0014224531,0.0021605531,0.00068246253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011849753,0.000082187136,0.004371896,0.019546961,0.00007142755,0.001153753,0.0046118987,0.00019876641,0.00061141426,0.22783509,0.15913951,0.58225864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007684045,0.00002172671,0.0058121854,0.023521915,0.00007839961,0.00038089752,0.0037742786,0.00003814655,0.00029973613,0.003922348,0.96212816,0.000014498225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032400187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.112380594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032400187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004725688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020181324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0644232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179505124","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v39i3.11341","title":"EXTRA-CURIAL STATEMENTS BY A NON- TESTIFYING CO-ACCUSED, THE CANADIAN SUPREME COURT AND CHANGE IN SOUTH AFRICA","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Hearsay; Appeal; Supreme court; Political science; Economic Justice; Statement (logic); Common law; Law of the case; Court of record; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.0769069062069869,"score_gpt":0.36522825698616346,"score_spread":0.28832135077917653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179505124","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3601085,0.024677956,0.0011476125,0.22664736,0.0016948777,0.00035516336,0.00055269996,0.00004343225,0.38477236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.887754,0.0037854458,0.0005575793,0.03762688,0.00015400485,0.000057916684,0.000062572355,0.000036683392,0.0699649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948555,0.0004548041,0.00014816616,0.0005839249,0.0014637874,0.0024937151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964307,0.0010814412,0.0002340345,0.00011278489,0.001384355,0.0007567409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033980478,0.00045946834,0.0004180163,0.0014680764,0.044129096,0.008545438,0.0017367227,0.010988523,0.004854408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009513747,0.0007112375,0.0004433089,0.0017777644,0.011832357,0.002508548,0.0024893982,0.012472009,0.00034167772],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011292992,0.000087102344,0.018048424,0.0002250105,0.00006405202,0.010049715,0.19666201,0.00040350572,0.002947347,0.6487817,0.09370418,0.028914087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114417584,0.000059256177,0.061400566,0.0011017424,0.0002213107,0.001543988,0.10838185,0.0006355196,0.0034520146,0.032889884,0.78975374,0.00044559228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9837678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9837678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07213448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09769493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52337474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183559477","doi":"10.1017/9781108283618.005","title":"Remedies for Laws That Violate Human Rights","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Declaration; Interim; Law; Political science; Damages; Parliament; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.054741096793653625,"score_gpt":0.27108160459509034,"score_spread":0.2163405078014367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183559477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004614761,0.006618184,0.016301433,0.018095247,0.00095480605,0.00027442846,0.00010567273,0.00019809103,0.9528373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3360799,0.009541387,0.02961907,0.025494285,0.0013547582,0.0007990882,0.00022365023,0.000214586,0.59667325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922402,0.0028444156,0.00039627895,0.0007264767,0.002729053,0.0010636033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949345,0.0028463823,0.00042943566,0.001161711,0.00049415487,0.00013380683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064345314,0.0006692771,0.0004553213,0.0018801678,0.0034381023,0.0051446874,0.0016158059,0.008020962,0.024871895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013417078,0.0004702602,0.00088326214,0.00084644265,0.011959424,0.004995255,0.004229882,0.006495681,0.004518096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002987725,0.000014546664,0.000063860876,0.000060393286,0.00000406236,0.0000883843,0.0009562803,0.00022590999,0.00027088833,0.97199214,0.013687827,0.012632728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020280771,0.000036928697,0.00052643096,0.00067825796,0.000015936637,0.00029571247,0.00074377947,0.0006275323,0.0010466599,0.37526348,0.6207131,0.000031895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004447708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007013114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024871895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030259152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071482393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083204746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184041181","doi":"10.1111/capa.12411","title":"Le droit de contracter avec l'État : Le principe d'égalité devant le service public en droit des marchés publics québécois","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"École Nationale d'Administration Publique","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02626523371792836,"score_gpt":0.2685474781656884,"score_spread":0.24228224444776006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184041181","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.115415186,0.0068752165,0.004829109,0.36289698,0.00076648965,0.00012112907,0.0002302136,0.000080086174,0.50878555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83048445,0.0018125274,0.0014217955,0.012794842,0.000103469145,0.000062857056,0.000036291138,0.00005265595,0.15323111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99509794,0.0014341965,0.00010076057,0.00046066067,0.0011958695,0.0017106041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99626607,0.00084312196,0.00026887687,0.00023442446,0.001398268,0.0009893368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037045993,0.00034323556,0.00026001607,0.0011636209,0.028502965,0.011611292,0.0015501804,0.005023883,0.00880251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007182327,0.0003381657,0.00032000832,0.0017276568,0.02680441,0.0031801912,0.0028904427,0.0059823114,0.0006646205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000220664,0.000021368203,0.0034099887,0.000060767477,0.000010761139,0.00030622058,0.040905755,0.00022670938,0.0003000328,0.9066375,0.037210442,0.01088844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032056214,0.000025650452,0.019461673,0.00040114395,0.00003435508,0.00017333709,0.06135305,0.0005090133,0.0005367405,0.04544509,0.87193376,0.000094093106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97900724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9863057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09076307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09076307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14720781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65853524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186140732","doi":"","title":"Access Barred: The Effects of the Cuts and Restructuring of Legal Aid in B.C. on Women Attempting to Navigate the Provincial Family Court System","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.008391708723394908,"score_gpt":0.27462851516831144,"score_spread":0.26623680644491654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186140732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9171495,0.0010347567,0.00012181347,0.02867305,0.00008595827,0.000022218628,0.00009597124,0.000008778678,0.052807957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99351865,0.00037749988,0.000049622016,0.0017448162,0.000016413118,0.00000935242,0.000012475633,0.0000032173484,0.004267816],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968189,0.00078401,0.000049161223,0.000092792136,0.00045688223,0.001798164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964296,0.0011121465,0.0007329556,0.00010418259,0.00051078206,0.0011102959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016739795,0.000113244096,0.0002402284,0.0006366358,0.015178525,0.0038190973,0.0010517245,0.0016775132,0.008649855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010229384,0.000197807,0.00024346558,0.0011274784,0.0070478697,0.0011271397,0.0037896298,0.0023830293,0.0003268303],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058879855,0.00046613085,0.299964,0.00028211423,0.00007487205,0.008985069,0.3944209,0.0012779582,0.0028938763,0.111951,0.04192784,0.13716748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005126865,0.00029479165,0.37780192,0.00060800323,0.00006991893,0.0013526112,0.49753314,0.00046428482,0.0009605308,0.008064061,0.112720154,0.00007937358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63546866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8214582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36453134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019264713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015779784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73335624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186341787","doi":"","title":"Improvising with Peter","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Generosity; Improvisation; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Scholarship; Kindness; Active listening; Relation (database); Sociology; Field (mathematics); Art; Aesthetics; Psychology; Law; Visual arts; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.007755458721970919,"score_gpt":0.2751028534742512,"score_spread":0.26734739475228025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186341787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2629635,0.00461217,0.01437115,0.13444518,0.003964501,0.0002657568,0.00016476744,0.00041575756,0.57879716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7742787,0.0015253227,0.0034176344,0.007133063,0.00039847588,0.000105084684,0.00004240277,0.0001809336,0.2129185],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899775,0.00042916572,0.000020319843,0.00014719127,0.00021965761,0.00018590152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848866,0.0007643391,0.00012948093,0.00011165703,0.00015345802,0.00035237917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009350539,0.0004554127,0.0001808454,0.0005963498,0.009743808,0.0041758283,0.00046816716,0.0018200937,0.017964123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061863814,0.00018619398,0.00017043328,0.00045147433,0.007892608,0.0039035417,0.003443768,0.0046884688,0.0031533407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014278114,0.000067090725,0.0012075289,0.00023675761,0.000009594026,0.0033152322,0.60605943,0.00015769714,0.0060578026,0.22822054,0.096440814,0.05808472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008926985,0.00007543614,0.0011986196,0.0003037677,0.000007894177,0.002443877,0.25921312,0.00022540776,0.0030366099,0.017121887,0.7163339,0.00003055815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036022044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076318844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017964123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014841491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001987026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060095966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186537419","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v40i3.11191","title":"Caveat Jurisconsultus: Warrantless Access to the Client Records of Legal Practitioners","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Legislation; Warrant; Law; Legislature; Confidentiality; Political science; Business; Constitution","score_opus":0.024129306489278527,"score_gpt":0.34774169685732614,"score_spread":0.3236123903680476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186537419","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007391647,0.0026826449,0.037290487,0.73150736,0.013486067,0.0005985013,0.004019434,0.0007882803,0.20223556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25749627,0.0021088177,0.04736422,0.60361373,0.01474969,0.0033217166,0.00072662474,0.00055157364,0.0700674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9740956,0.0072890795,0.0018440721,0.0069686733,0.00724043,0.0025621457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89307046,0.07860863,0.004389355,0.009929644,0.012723788,0.001278174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021975426,0.0016202881,0.0020044718,0.0022593054,0.013160056,0.0064921095,0.010323981,0.017206043,0.04806866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1409125,0.0013873694,0.002142505,0.0022232186,0.016503414,0.01799182,0.0075526894,0.031401757,0.014925084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016712857,0.00006672267,0.0021610467,0.00048750057,0.00006343818,0.0014110468,0.006380739,0.00042585423,0.00023461711,0.5696827,0.40181613,0.017102994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017165816,0.00004404852,0.0017149838,0.0009219465,0.00008337023,0.0013850387,0.0026128031,0.0020084507,0.00079873466,0.53529686,0.4547949,0.00016717188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042670384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03931836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04806866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063459594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009494275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1608057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189319554","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1268","title":"Reimagining Toronto’s Community Councils","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stewardship (theology); Public administration; Local government; Corporate governance; Citizen journalism; Function (biology); Power (physics); Political science; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Public relations; Management; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.05488240855583334,"score_gpt":0.3888048319306447,"score_spread":0.3339224233748114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189319554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5127559,0.0033583376,0.06516451,0.08353524,0.0033905038,0.0029228332,0.00075542316,0.001140055,0.3269772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91801345,0.00066455716,0.022959834,0.0027555204,0.00017468011,0.0006074952,0.00023320453,0.0001349275,0.054456327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877323,0.00525434,0.00036181457,0.00093644485,0.003386837,0.002328232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97076607,0.005550595,0.0016727436,0.0036744915,0.009076535,0.009259527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011512907,0.0003780111,0.00030466152,0.0017397352,0.012819982,0.009945049,0.0022619027,0.0020806715,0.00706699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019068511,0.0005296895,0.00037116386,0.0019177756,0.013865377,0.003415766,0.007394382,0.0019460272,0.00059522863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001875304,0.00015725907,0.029434761,0.00042059133,0.000051280036,0.001792773,0.1782223,0.0069531193,0.003616219,0.51652825,0.13036798,0.13226795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041910924,0.00014455651,0.015489611,0.00021316482,0.00003957748,0.00017449385,0.050233472,0.0017652338,0.0011512015,0.008527858,0.9221527,0.000066401786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5543403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8324156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92356366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07643634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09005772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89656854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189387988","doi":"10.4018/978-1-7998-7898-8.ch011","title":"Challenges Facing Mediation as a Means of Court-Connected Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Ashanti Region of Ghana","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in public policy and administration (APPA) book series","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.04995125228873101,"score_gpt":0.33630475771760043,"score_spread":0.2863535054288694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189387988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21100774,0.15764,0.0025397302,0.18635024,0.0016554032,0.00032837567,0.0003409507,0.00007536365,0.4400622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7989728,0.079638526,0.0027249681,0.0057165087,0.0004326267,0.00015310817,0.00017950777,0.000036778663,0.11214514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979322,0.0012139974,0.00006712262,0.0000946199,0.00032815148,0.0003640183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982344,0.0011354052,0.00026844713,0.000041040963,0.00009238321,0.00022838239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021642025,0.00018124105,0.00023163296,0.00072666723,0.0040449835,0.007349415,0.001198356,0.0026331914,0.01730873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036633047,0.00024105277,0.00019764373,0.002887882,0.003891938,0.0039100703,0.0029789542,0.0028728081,0.0016548211],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010267098,0.00020766747,0.008310467,0.0030045374,0.000021648302,0.017511675,0.10143147,0.0011875846,0.0017886193,0.46121344,0.13593602,0.26928422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025871885,0.00008991446,0.009511281,0.0023375466,0.000011793108,0.0033660447,0.15724266,0.0005603294,0.0003611967,0.03986866,0.78659546,0.000029177865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013810827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037372317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01730873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065312805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009947792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05790353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191729461","doi":"","title":"Learning from the experts: A new approach to poverty reduction South African Homeless People's Federation and People's Dialogue on Land and Shelter","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Work","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Poverty; Poverty reduction; Poor people; Economic growth; Political science; Development economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.02501548186102481,"score_gpt":0.2866277817562159,"score_spread":0.2616122998951911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191729461","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015299456,0.009168468,0.01964314,0.79388994,0.0047395607,0.0003326682,0.00002829384,0.00010015514,0.15679842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7351174,0.012939421,0.03250181,0.11042352,0.0036502883,0.0012323378,0.00004106676,0.00020475558,0.1038894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97595054,0.017973341,0.0004797059,0.001123351,0.0019364762,0.002536588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96933305,0.021146847,0.0010040711,0.00094135856,0.0017098031,0.005864937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03533199,0.000876699,0.00080658344,0.005580534,0.036498677,0.02139422,0.0029947518,0.014675931,0.012373955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03194949,0.0005033733,0.000802828,0.0026252999,0.06312294,0.024098285,0.02056179,0.016526766,0.0007799378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002636363,0.00009081667,0.0004450785,0.00038189036,0.000013468435,0.0006160354,0.22437786,0.00026277595,0.00026889468,0.66157305,0.058812793,0.053131007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041191477,0.000061042396,0.00059156306,0.0011089792,0.000013018632,0.00035404466,0.15661587,0.000378011,0.00024159595,0.35411593,0.48643214,0.00004655469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013336275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029657278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036498677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02016109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04911256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18685567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195038048","doi":"","title":"Director's Duty to Act for a Proper Purpose in the Context of Distribution under the Companies Act 71 of 2008","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Statute; Statutory law; Statutory interpretation; Law; Companies Act; Context (archaeology); Common law; Interpretation (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Statute of limitations; Face (sociological concept); Law and economics; Political science; Business; Corporate law; Economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.0166167324502717,"score_gpt":0.30246970897346087,"score_spread":0.2858529765231892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195038048","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14191933,0.003922171,0.0048586586,0.05682551,0.0010546197,0.00011861981,0.0001467196,0.000047669782,0.7911067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8703369,0.0028082584,0.002728788,0.018632447,0.000840792,0.00019716675,0.000104745835,0.000044820412,0.10430609],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98196304,0.00804623,0.0009519839,0.0014490266,0.0045299553,0.0030596717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987887,0.0076137823,0.0015308068,0.00049822615,0.0019770744,0.0004931252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009981407,0.00033394288,0.00048377665,0.0011502244,0.0065642707,0.011601675,0.0010662671,0.005718362,0.0036535836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017490946,0.00044135135,0.00042841976,0.00096172176,0.011131656,0.006390585,0.003989259,0.0064087533,0.00089073455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021742691,0.000030480387,0.0016066226,0.000056396035,0.0000034380157,0.0004973955,0.016776754,0.0003077503,0.00036747436,0.95817155,0.017336182,0.0048241518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032959266,0.000117197946,0.011459022,0.00092645054,0.00004369705,0.0008499812,0.032176033,0.00094061915,0.0013418389,0.07443385,0.8775529,0.00012531127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031511415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04277909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031511415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0111766355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014744765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08109254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195498398","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.33.1.04","title":"Section 28’s Potential to Guarantee Substantive Gender Equality in <i>Hak c Procureur général du Québec</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Gender equality; Charter; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Action (physics); Order (exchange); Sociology; Constitutional court; Law and economics; Gender studies; Constitution; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.025733274067818057,"score_gpt":0.26755339791935123,"score_spread":0.24182012385153318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195498398","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07278799,0.0015786579,0.0076997904,0.075168714,0.00095153187,0.00031413254,0.0002075321,0.00014453838,0.8411472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7747093,0.0006777556,0.0056640026,0.034431122,0.0002013905,0.00022784782,0.00007768273,0.000077695244,0.18393315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99037814,0.0021478727,0.00026933075,0.0012162483,0.0027400411,0.00324845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99224794,0.0024508848,0.00041579717,0.0007618827,0.0032094042,0.0009140487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008600243,0.0004259656,0.00042162812,0.0009039475,0.016104234,0.008274509,0.0022859548,0.006860831,0.007857807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010637832,0.000573048,0.0007690448,0.000636945,0.02046313,0.0020682565,0.003749515,0.006651955,0.0006265527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002061227,0.000024180183,0.0014954971,0.000040579547,0.000011366306,0.00052520266,0.008724389,0.0004059083,0.00081408623,0.95004356,0.029678758,0.008215898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008177574,0.0001045124,0.012948826,0.00044466276,0.00005250314,0.00048552442,0.01911286,0.001644149,0.0020839216,0.12816706,0.8346024,0.00027177852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89822453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9510541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10177547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041958213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1088943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3044296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195954957","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.152","title":"An Analysis of Public Order Policing in the Gauteng Province, South Africa","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Legitimacy; Order (exchange); Democracy; Public relations; Public administration; Public order; Political science; Public engagement; Public service; Civil society; Public trust; Sociology; Law; Politics; Business","score_opus":0.08456295755198988,"score_gpt":0.37624038195952453,"score_spread":0.29167742440753464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195954957","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98564374,0.0007127324,0.0004757977,0.0010183011,0.000026733036,0.0004897032,0.00047394252,0.000007740815,0.011151314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926844,0.0009431597,0.000721426,0.00013937002,0.000009684738,0.00025731677,0.00021214517,0.000013272787,0.0050193216],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982029,0.0005642823,0.00007507637,0.0001354177,0.00029778044,0.00072452455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996878,0.0016623745,0.00050055777,0.00007604226,0.0005692452,0.00031378996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018110943,0.00047005445,0.0004981936,0.004328468,0.0076398444,0.0024147662,0.0009855255,0.0007904431,0.0064333514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060518715,0.0005209824,0.00023536102,0.0076958034,0.003652882,0.0011601389,0.002379494,0.0009030096,0.0003733136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053779728,0.0000565565,0.025676774,0.0008326756,0.000015874608,0.006858717,0.9402746,0.00024632335,0.0012779678,0.0038994222,0.0019339897,0.018873349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028017307,0.000022857368,0.055349708,0.00036926687,0.0000058892724,0.00026757232,0.9273283,0.0001163657,0.00014326746,0.0002447996,0.016141117,0.000007959982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25518897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4380598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25518897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019026756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018539459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5074072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197169129","doi":"","title":"(Re)creating Boundary Lines: Assessing Toronto's Ward Boundary Review Process","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"TD Bank","keywords":"Appeal; Corporate governance; Boundary (topology); Representation (politics); Process (computing); Public administration; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Geography; Management; Law; Computer science; Politics; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.035098699703135276,"score_gpt":0.35840714699723614,"score_spread":0.32330844729410085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197169129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71542245,0.004125742,0.035050526,0.031901762,0.0008561619,0.006326816,0.0015374889,0.0007145983,0.20406441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95852345,0.00078143465,0.025369441,0.00097301404,0.000088795794,0.0015919618,0.00058257947,0.00019459278,0.011894696],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.88259935,0.06797323,0.0069447695,0.004187914,0.033310194,0.0049845483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5216763,0.2508131,0.044573143,0.02379436,0.13496186,0.024181299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11746371,0.00039441258,0.0007570959,0.009785997,0.01643116,0.015790155,0.0034092565,0.0024244622,0.008483387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.43542576,0.00072893035,0.00050508283,0.008534371,0.0054779733,0.0072835656,0.015424805,0.0028591512,0.0012639469],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005678592,0.00015668668,0.10097642,0.0011627887,0.00016168282,0.0005894073,0.36891952,0.00296905,0.001579263,0.080522716,0.072813295,0.3695813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015519223,0.00048901467,0.22779186,0.0029254726,0.00025629695,0.00027196514,0.44178423,0.013486837,0.00351734,0.034350026,0.27450794,0.00046375277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26832825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45922711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73167175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047684547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09116833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62121487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197908878","doi":"","title":"Reimagining Toronto's Community Councils","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Local government; Humanities; Sociology; Public administration; Art","score_opus":0.04962825735037202,"score_gpt":0.3389958492203268,"score_spread":0.28936759186995475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197908878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5110224,0.0035741513,0.056098495,0.090743706,0.003394372,0.0028505267,0.00080007844,0.0010743191,0.33044192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9151446,0.0007406533,0.020012632,0.0035257542,0.00018157224,0.00060672144,0.00024163326,0.00012884145,0.05941764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887644,0.004417231,0.00030278324,0.0008978309,0.0032820483,0.0023355875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97301316,0.0050579626,0.0015163023,0.0032992142,0.007949359,0.009163994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011420654,0.00035839784,0.00028277072,0.0016672744,0.013462208,0.009914193,0.002249891,0.0020458184,0.0071131797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017512511,0.00049615157,0.00035651986,0.001832506,0.013814848,0.003239087,0.0072114198,0.0020910306,0.0005716242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016401158,0.00015131272,0.032727115,0.00037342534,0.000047717665,0.0017111795,0.16283213,0.005779774,0.0030890366,0.5162513,0.1439755,0.13289744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004059888,0.00015246571,0.018814575,0.00022946256,0.000039149563,0.00016592524,0.05499653,0.0015711322,0.0010788948,0.008233759,0.9146126,0.00006489081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.591524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8658461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.408476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0800634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09824558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82176316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198319603","doi":"","title":"ACPNS Legal Case Notes Series 2021-79 Canadian Union of Postal Workers v B'nai Brith Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; Relation (database); Series (stratigraphy); High Court; Computer science","score_opus":0.0063282733207325114,"score_gpt":0.21071020671401483,"score_spread":0.2043819333932823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198319603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008712861,0.0020997915,0.0003014907,0.031341154,0.0012490735,0.0002651659,0.0030850708,0.00010154678,0.9528438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.060157325,0.0012981273,0.000415454,0.03091091,0.00025637326,0.00019804416,0.0009071494,0.00006718638,0.9057894],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957378,0.00016421148,0.000070808914,0.0002266058,0.0021155244,0.0016849834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821717,0.00032589302,0.000049427057,0.00007183218,0.0009900427,0.00034563072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014774962,0.0006615121,0.00041670023,0.0020403818,0.0246074,0.00604692,0.0021645557,0.0109091485,0.054835204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045983708,0.00081703934,0.0007836441,0.0023519807,0.0027105156,0.0011377166,0.0018213167,0.006762416,0.0072792056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000559288,0.000057439913,0.00197031,0.00007679854,0.000014939236,0.00094695,0.0013309832,0.00025045284,0.00036868872,0.12824373,0.8574119,0.009271822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000350888,0.000016914715,0.006268932,0.000162868,0.000029848088,0.00016402538,0.0017272905,0.0002935569,0.0004366312,0.004278817,0.98653597,0.000050093087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.982895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9938573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05691937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05691937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.107920125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41298085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199096622","doi":"","title":"Effective Remediation in Public Procurement: Damages or Judicial Review?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Procurement; Damages; Liability; Business; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.029347270289572378,"score_gpt":0.32532028746549585,"score_spread":0.29597301717592345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199096622","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04203207,0.07846836,0.05515113,0.5181967,0.004564699,0.00032598033,0.00006628783,0.00016007294,0.30103466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8854181,0.015720818,0.008786671,0.05578247,0.004115256,0.00015535863,0.000026933276,0.00007228225,0.029921986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.91854274,0.03886211,0.004132827,0.0058848956,0.02303384,0.0095435735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8876209,0.08024768,0.011417555,0.006404625,0.011805088,0.0025041986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053100806,0.0004921265,0.0016098875,0.0026345267,0.0074455533,0.01656477,0.004484653,0.01882348,0.004579808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11427045,0.0006814656,0.00088871346,0.0022898375,0.029891366,0.012562629,0.0070035667,0.010640602,0.00080959505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018696197,0.000035632827,0.0006414652,0.00025677567,0.000036304515,0.00048104592,0.0030567152,0.0007859122,0.00033175678,0.9430373,0.016484797,0.034833685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010358454,0.00016450002,0.002976067,0.0018747323,0.00009948384,0.0011359835,0.0076969573,0.001615446,0.001576856,0.64179623,0.34077272,0.00018741717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014762975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019746028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053100806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0150638735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026357789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28082728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199977776","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v32i2.12265","title":"WHICH STRUCTURES DOES THE HOUSEBREAKING CRIME PROTECT?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Law; Fence (mathematics); Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Business; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.017192545392954086,"score_gpt":0.3081281536896537,"score_spread":0.2909356082966996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199977776","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15504026,0.009471414,0.01517085,0.14834955,0.0006853248,0.0002026278,0.0019477056,0.00027931185,0.668853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9618382,0.0074009555,0.0023732253,0.005814619,0.0005164586,0.00008941621,0.00076283637,0.00017080255,0.02103364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961283,0.0011462014,0.00014925444,0.0005921319,0.0009424611,0.0010415249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99116313,0.0022409374,0.0023760432,0.0011770109,0.0017841827,0.0012587435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034438025,0.00043976182,0.0005712964,0.0021754503,0.004694146,0.010889943,0.002202304,0.0028858741,0.019108068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018738652,0.0006970805,0.0006973968,0.0019284859,0.020367859,0.01718915,0.0036146562,0.0026981875,0.0073788655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008451127,0.00011756055,0.028391305,0.00041734937,0.000061151404,0.000497642,0.016150651,0.00082566444,0.00037154084,0.81877255,0.043842494,0.09046761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030147943,0.00009343036,0.052147664,0.00199276,0.00007517528,0.0012181788,0.04235873,0.0010004786,0.0011262455,0.6243161,0.27555093,0.000090222384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04729349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07123447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04729349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010625011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011460783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0940364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201436197","doi":"10.33423/jabe.v23i2.4089","title":"The Impact of the New Regulation of Public Enterprise Contracts on the Cameroonian System of Public Procurement Contracting","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Business and Economics","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Procurement; Dynamism; Business; Adjudication; Constructive; Law and economics; Industrial organization; Law; Economics; Marketing; Process (computing); Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.029745005759056118,"score_gpt":0.26370523671148144,"score_spread":0.23396023095242532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201436197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83533293,0.0035697126,0.0021693131,0.019063422,0.00016400144,0.0001421731,0.00012635348,0.000013841628,0.13941817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996766,0.00052644196,0.00033911274,0.0004547363,0.00002222889,0.000016157665,0.00001004286,0.0000015777164,0.0018637627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950728,0.0024374665,0.00012280009,0.0002446778,0.0006665086,0.0014557173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920066,0.0041107074,0.0017863022,0.0004194511,0.0011583758,0.0005186472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004502351,0.00017903154,0.0001853777,0.0009746147,0.0025229538,0.0046651447,0.0005507507,0.00092962495,0.004151577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010701838,0.00020890262,0.0001719097,0.0017096284,0.0051820255,0.0018169009,0.0014616715,0.0014449168,0.000114206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003565764,0.00012242558,0.047741618,0.0002981911,0.000032997887,0.0061819134,0.016111856,0.0046786787,0.0032556055,0.87116057,0.0042538717,0.045805648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017970432,0.0007240966,0.4688481,0.0019409577,0.00019892215,0.0033039907,0.072459385,0.016243735,0.0060960543,0.09916571,0.33055794,0.0002813056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09078481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.084559746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09078481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014607288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010543588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18051279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202796054","doi":"10.1017/9781108283618.009","title":"Remedies for Social, Economic and Cultural Rights","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Damages; Eviction; Legislature; Interim; Cultural rights; Law and economics; Law; Human rights; International human rights law; Economics","score_opus":0.04090890984125542,"score_gpt":0.26541158050871483,"score_spread":0.2245026706674594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202796054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029868137,0.012505401,0.008860708,0.018511795,0.0009279803,0.00014084611,0.00005019394,0.000080798854,0.9559355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2577425,0.013176818,0.013970196,0.010177295,0.00088538614,0.00032086903,0.00007548013,0.00009979563,0.70355165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781907,0.00069392804,0.00012016221,0.00027477767,0.0008207294,0.00027129738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987674,0.00072297687,0.00008274703,0.00019545497,0.00017365815,0.00005781281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028550676,0.00057641504,0.00040451484,0.0013661893,0.0029982561,0.004069096,0.0011008023,0.003969607,0.015912304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045020967,0.00026598317,0.0005012822,0.0008593246,0.0135930395,0.0050640046,0.003015636,0.0069571147,0.002203112],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019411098,0.000006941895,0.00002704894,0.000048778118,0.0000012927743,0.00004560952,0.0008707299,0.00016181117,0.00016291518,0.97934955,0.008425186,0.010898168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009370023,0.000026308644,0.0003229903,0.00047016868,0.00000701538,0.00020231328,0.0007756075,0.0003611818,0.000550695,0.34423068,0.65302837,0.000015250369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005334077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0098720165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015912304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050780904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007615629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053231955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205378507","doi":"","title":"Analysis of Construction Dispute Cases in Canadian Courts and Lessons Learned for Modular and Off-site Construction Contracts","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Construction contract; Process (computing); Business; Modular design; Contract management; Supreme court; Popularity; Engineering; Law; Political science; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.03948868914331469,"score_gpt":0.3367185654483378,"score_spread":0.29722987630502307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205378507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8744808,0.0056978017,0.0047797435,0.0048184465,0.00007153903,0.0007878834,0.0021940863,0.0000655817,0.10710412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860647,0.0039885943,0.0034719186,0.000297047,0.000021553295,0.00010649359,0.0010113756,0.00001698362,0.005021465],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801775,0.0019104923,0.0012000186,0.001407347,0.011857478,0.0034472083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9649311,0.013071767,0.0043575196,0.0008759354,0.01582403,0.00093960896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00976423,0.0005217253,0.0007073187,0.025445782,0.014408051,0.008370786,0.0027803855,0.001860487,0.0027727645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04092758,0.0005813783,0.001027453,0.03602117,0.0066930824,0.003505072,0.0021485833,0.0019876324,0.00021921306],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018643543,0.00027331046,0.3845259,0.0015338027,0.00016148125,0.008746308,0.09923937,0.009776537,0.0011222932,0.3073178,0.02450856,0.16260819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003321233,0.000072894756,0.6563205,0.0019588007,0.00039218066,0.0020823735,0.19236752,0.028539311,0.0017995086,0.021774143,0.09432535,0.00033412423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96729636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9757991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13948958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13948958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12647058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205980090","doi":"10.1017/s0147547901214136","title":"Glen Adler and Eddie Webster, eds., Trade Unions and Democratization in South Africa, 1985–1997. New York: St. Martin's Press, 2000. vii + 238 pp. $69.95 cloth.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; Democratization; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Economic history; Politics; Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political economy; Law; Sociology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.034546674694404506,"score_gpt":0.27198863033636417,"score_spread":0.23744195564195966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205980090","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005711905,0.97939795,0.00020844162,0.009938685,0.0013396058,0.0000110525125,0.00012061547,0.000025017513,0.008387414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0072842836,0.9695925,0.00032311084,0.0007854975,0.0007808824,0.000026772053,0.00012472915,0.000031067382,0.021051057],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997129,0.000075495525,0.000030574185,0.000047239344,0.00008457841,0.00004906758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993011,0.00030697556,0.00013156599,0.000023406925,0.00010880815,0.00012829369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009762164,0.0022766243,0.0009620682,0.0032185488,0.0015335893,0.003105933,0.0009592871,0.0018652999,0.02704105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002149391,0.0011889668,0.0003980144,0.005816851,0.0021479996,0.007014947,0.0013582258,0.0020053983,0.009615494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013418592,0.00008436319,0.0018926306,0.0030943057,0.000058308466,0.00034452675,0.005240838,0.0006236334,0.00027629168,0.014014762,0.73331124,0.24092498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022264936,0.000026394264,0.006008347,0.004411995,0.00004206327,0.0004366657,0.0040492266,0.00018491801,0.00027321398,0.011246946,0.97327393,0.000024032985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024498826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05551355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02704105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002689796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051671723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09046131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207502307","doi":"","title":"Freedom of Expression and Academic Freedom on Canadian University Campuses: Liberté d’expression et liberté universitaire sur les campus canadiens","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Undergraduate Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of expression; Humanities; Expression (computer science); Politics; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.031215914249968002,"score_gpt":0.29464194829337087,"score_spread":0.26342603404340287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207502307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5888686,0.0040441244,0.0009137721,0.03374896,0.00018025837,0.000046902238,0.00047187787,0.000023389595,0.37170213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97523254,0.00080914126,0.0001297376,0.0005157768,0.000020558578,0.000011982705,0.00006332669,0.00001076664,0.02320611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943164,0.00078066695,0.00007487034,0.00027825346,0.0017240997,0.0028256958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99337876,0.0013524198,0.00057427597,0.0002233968,0.0018538014,0.0026174574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019961046,0.00033376654,0.00054227904,0.0029952144,0.0358335,0.012448117,0.0015945778,0.002165084,0.015968313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0080027515,0.0002629694,0.0005405647,0.006582066,0.02121398,0.003723311,0.0066346894,0.003922708,0.0006298363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013953102,0.000103512604,0.036824092,0.000093579736,0.000034014047,0.00049008406,0.15241192,0.0008601969,0.00027245216,0.75788105,0.019229058,0.031660605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058787118,0.000053303622,0.27842322,0.00057137455,0.00008820028,0.00022726758,0.37256533,0.0018360241,0.0005289807,0.075185195,0.27015334,0.00030902846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9859287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99247473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86272293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13727708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.088518314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211268824","doi":"","title":"Quantification of damages for malicious prosecution: A comparative analysis of recent South African and Commonwealth case law (2)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Law; Tort; Plaintiff; Confusion; Political science; Commonwealth; Cause of action; Action (physics); Element (criminal law); Liability; Psychology","score_opus":0.11505500301773637,"score_gpt":0.4004993345167652,"score_spread":0.28544433149902887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211268824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9536983,0.0076159216,0.00053187483,0.0029552078,0.000052919702,0.00011594794,0.00010968573,0.0000037593616,0.034916446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947725,0.0034331314,0.00022694685,0.00024194151,0.000022135868,0.000035842175,0.000033577584,0.000003832675,0.0012300598],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99630404,0.0013521508,0.0003342556,0.00021450476,0.0008514312,0.0009436608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762656,0.017371587,0.0035685366,0.0004349269,0.0018381774,0.00052115007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008532684,0.00024254298,0.00032542157,0.0122122625,0.0069311443,0.0044364263,0.001189391,0.0017332317,0.0044879797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032674257,0.00040621264,0.0004417146,0.012171403,0.005955474,0.0040029217,0.0038475539,0.002004222,0.00017893223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030600815,0.00039218698,0.1853191,0.0018017794,0.00019812373,0.017027687,0.37126318,0.0012750231,0.0015631783,0.3523987,0.006808969,0.06164621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025428235,0.000284568,0.5260143,0.0023763513,0.00018050159,0.0076814825,0.36663926,0.0015248106,0.0013737234,0.017041769,0.0767233,0.00013444752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06382126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18240313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06382126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012976597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045083114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12689954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213018447","doi":"10.21128/1812-7126-2021-5-118-137","title":"The concept of human dignity in the case-law of the Supreme Court of Canada on Charter Equality Rights","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sravnitel noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Supreme court; Law; Human rights; Charter; Adjudication; Political science; Fundamental rights; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.034556323815057036,"score_gpt":0.3077362683404588,"score_spread":0.2731799445254018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213018447","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06101286,0.015502815,0.016034793,0.119053885,0.0020790403,0.0002597112,0.00027191036,0.00008423205,0.78570074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8983017,0.005132769,0.006409533,0.032397047,0.00048851216,0.00012922866,0.00009613153,0.00006776146,0.056977354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9784152,0.004142214,0.00054414116,0.0019119759,0.010543267,0.0044433195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99009997,0.004562375,0.00043020688,0.00045975926,0.0035109,0.0009367651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013514751,0.00052334403,0.00068187225,0.0027590916,0.02404197,0.014617805,0.0028270965,0.011830534,0.0027409825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023342729,0.00055970263,0.00058993284,0.0032548234,0.037625164,0.005758767,0.0060678725,0.013068731,0.00022350585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055094006,0.0000050103513,0.00041738423,0.000014315383,0.000003712538,0.00024132825,0.0022381272,0.00020031385,0.0000818548,0.98787934,0.0050930046,0.0038200975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004897447,0.00004951748,0.004963499,0.0011085329,0.00007057781,0.0004994003,0.0066863075,0.0023749433,0.0011301101,0.30768374,0.67508197,0.00030253554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.945538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9638244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09881631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09881631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16813937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7169659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217014753","doi":"10.1017/s0008423921000858","title":"Decolonizing Authority: The Conflict on Wet'suwet’en Territory","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Indigenous; Legal pluralism; Politics; Colonialism; Political science; Traditional authority; Corporate governance; Decolonization; Political authority; Law; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Political economy; Law and economics; Epistemology; Comparative law; Geography; Legal realism","score_opus":0.03716939979351979,"score_gpt":0.34432353547953864,"score_spread":0.30715413568601885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217014753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85937536,0.00078012625,0.0016129022,0.01157012,0.000054721775,0.000031043106,0.000017102839,0.0000065742793,0.12655208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979444,0.00009417257,0.000117036914,0.00015093015,0.000004398255,0.000006612141,0.0000023759233,0.0000029694593,0.0016770792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718577,0.0014454151,0.00008381847,0.0001488863,0.0004167176,0.00071939855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976578,0.001378835,0.0003612513,0.00013183078,0.00017575132,0.00029449654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003082701,0.00015651005,0.00037805017,0.0009573254,0.010667819,0.005355706,0.0007400125,0.002082159,0.0035554422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004678846,0.00021851732,0.0001391849,0.001322222,0.024784809,0.0044672387,0.007578234,0.0035221817,0.00013681609],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030396806,0.000024672301,0.0024723792,0.000054993234,0.000006266057,0.0028524648,0.44652304,0.00025976705,0.0009175028,0.53675187,0.0011359677,0.008970711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024275243,0.000077567,0.013557612,0.00046523826,0.000014285071,0.0019573034,0.71028006,0.0011584203,0.0011744789,0.12584215,0.14539272,0.000055956272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027600056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05380611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97239995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007720966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004065291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056019783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217764329","doi":"10.59952/tuj.v2i1.34","title":"The impact of single window system on customs administration at Victoria falls border post in Zambia","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Revenue; The Internet; Trade facilitation; Information and Communications Technology; Government (linguistics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Business; Implementation; Geography; Engineering; Finance; International trade; Free trade; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.012352028263512655,"score_gpt":0.2853515881729626,"score_spread":0.2729995599094499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217764329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969729,0.00004956485,0.000032455395,0.00034277,0.0000027903702,0.000011314448,0.000011037413,0.000001995565,0.002575241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99867487,0.00008126085,0.000043990723,0.000031852054,0.0000012418315,0.0000051472093,0.000005235007,0.0000012459906,0.001155296],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985019,0.00045908566,0.000054318873,0.00007705734,0.00020149638,0.00070612895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99648845,0.0008411178,0.0013392506,0.0001246876,0.00044117193,0.0007653106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009989219,0.00011179638,0.00014234468,0.0006856547,0.0051668514,0.0023187348,0.0004978589,0.00046556196,0.0057564243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004712765,0.00024557355,0.00015230305,0.0010000688,0.0022066988,0.0010557516,0.0015135342,0.0010412342,0.00022394056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026128502,0.00042389194,0.71505386,0.00021172769,0.00004469399,0.0069488673,0.19861932,0.0005851193,0.004926329,0.011818033,0.0033205333,0.05778628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004864589,0.00013335967,0.83342063,0.0001225106,0.00001989631,0.00027502497,0.15792672,0.0003614656,0.0003484867,0.0002606321,0.0071096844,0.000016627288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22630645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41561514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22630645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007272996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061199088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44997835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W35489204","doi":"10.29173/alr62","title":"Mitigation, Specific Performance, and the Property Developer: &lt;i&gt;Southcott Estates Inc. v. Toronto Catholic District School Board&lt;/i&gt;","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Business; Law; Management; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01124517219457759,"score_gpt":0.24797532339761671,"score_spread":0.2367301512030391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W35489204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022913348,0.006532157,0.0008105576,0.05569326,0.0004432432,0.0000887226,0.00056409906,0.00007034155,0.91288424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48427278,0.004780553,0.0008706353,0.029453248,0.0003561761,0.00012487228,0.00036937866,0.00005826333,0.47971407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943183,0.00090089237,0.00019901416,0.00039205185,0.002216864,0.0019728201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965276,0.0011366351,0.00028264752,0.0002325483,0.0013488913,0.00047166023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030043414,0.0005299084,0.00030003168,0.0014887183,0.009161815,0.005131883,0.0015883998,0.008337422,0.021231402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069965166,0.0004727573,0.00059925363,0.0014958911,0.0053088656,0.0019888056,0.002520483,0.004215808,0.0018947202],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057111025,0.00007735371,0.0087992195,0.00025166335,0.000049156773,0.0008248289,0.0027002797,0.00084743655,0.0008321925,0.6312362,0.3337926,0.020531852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006672401,0.00010423688,0.032898933,0.00064348115,0.00017244185,0.00049382925,0.005252864,0.0005191728,0.0021940235,0.030196827,0.9273445,0.00011302511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51846945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7845458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48153055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011262771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033583842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9687328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W354984725","doi":"","title":"The diary of Sarah, Lady Cowper","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Pickering & Chatto eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Majesty; Duty; Poor relief; Greenwich; History; Corporation; Political science; Classics; Sociology; Poverty","score_opus":0.021061243128608253,"score_gpt":0.29145097824324806,"score_spread":0.2703897351146398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W354984725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016263187,0.13863173,0.0010722111,0.18816157,0.1012828,0.00008853324,0.0025680037,0.0006013449,0.5659675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003802135,0.012185033,0.00027796553,0.018599875,0.0034998576,0.000037360445,0.00037764464,0.00016970218,0.9610504],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999172,0.000196753,0.000029860255,0.00013897284,0.0003384451,0.00012405068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988011,0.0002663723,0.00006514369,0.00011874863,0.00042389124,0.00032481118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095247576,0.0009531952,0.0006810085,0.0015070273,0.005055307,0.007626225,0.0011383991,0.0019161298,0.16113256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048191906,0.0005329179,0.00030469697,0.0023129694,0.0013195297,0.00463974,0.0033485086,0.0048740273,0.09206888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008143539,0.000004139029,0.000028635173,0.000022516833,5.385002e-7,0.000016135038,0.00022666022,0.000007027343,0.000016129068,0.0019056294,0.9868238,0.010940709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.3737307e-7,0.0000012807875,0.00004816503,0.000036384587,2.3530286e-7,0.0000157728,0.00021787887,0.0000030340923,0.0000070221704,0.0001473153,0.99952114,0.0000012854056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014957803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03466552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16113256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002374094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034502398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5390421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W38316102","doi":"10.1016/j.jelekin.2024.102865","title":"The prevention of HIV transmission from mother-to-child : the obligations of the South African government in terms of national and international laws","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nova Scotia Health Research Foundation","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Transmission (telecommunications); Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Medicine; Virology; Engineering; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.011125025305814907,"score_gpt":0.29568205595804403,"score_spread":0.28455703065222915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W38316102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7638163,0.016231535,0.00025049056,0.15198974,0.00029511415,0.0000542637,0.000079402955,0.000006819509,0.0672763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792615,0.010044131,0.00033422344,0.0024352206,0.00005481938,0.000020226613,0.000013660101,0.0000034352151,0.007832716],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994838,0.0002548049,0.000013503288,0.000015640324,0.000053240452,0.00017903671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899656,0.00051053043,0.00017418004,0.000033832806,0.00006821932,0.00021656847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013974846,0.00009867226,0.00009805788,0.000276771,0.0027373403,0.0015578001,0.00019868578,0.0006409972,0.0053522293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004540142,0.00010102941,0.00007478601,0.00039586055,0.0011304272,0.00094997126,0.0008833703,0.0012478301,0.00019721642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014953452,0.00040547614,0.18422374,0.00060628867,0.00003811314,0.0052188225,0.23460431,0.00017980408,0.003778282,0.09388229,0.049286973,0.42762646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031218035,0.0001932072,0.364717,0.0034508915,0.000051179584,0.0029817026,0.37868768,0.00024185602,0.0019944096,0.016253388,0.23136035,0.000037162034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014639325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0418042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014639325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011124341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059020035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029108226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200031576","doi":"10.1002/iir.1442","title":"<i>Sequana I</i>: Struggling with section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Appeal; Section (typography); Law; Relation (database); Norm (philosophy); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Advertising","score_opus":0.025393993595580186,"score_gpt":0.3326100410917249,"score_spread":0.3072160474961447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200031576","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07345876,0.012165182,0.002000307,0.39355823,0.0025501119,0.00018783826,0.00019747199,0.0000632162,0.5158189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5814257,0.0070947004,0.0022352769,0.21002272,0.0014943549,0.000248965,0.00018657307,0.00005042455,0.19724128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952207,0.0013033069,0.00031572802,0.00048549662,0.0017595491,0.00091518514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99106896,0.005773385,0.00057969266,0.00020892273,0.0019378026,0.0004312308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065968395,0.00014605979,0.00025422158,0.00080235116,0.0056604235,0.0053416113,0.0010850214,0.005734418,0.0032147465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017985603,0.00031017372,0.0002022777,0.001067378,0.0029479787,0.001107417,0.0015648237,0.006529063,0.0006965877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004082142,0.0000426786,0.0058365813,0.00024003166,0.000013874158,0.0012728766,0.012404941,0.00034152812,0.0016948316,0.5931433,0.3604863,0.024482213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013969525,0.00007491048,0.017152285,0.00053738547,0.000039143993,0.00036323298,0.0069479477,0.0003697918,0.0017420624,0.0152981,0.95740104,0.000060178256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16203173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34348154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16203173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049845395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017884733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32217717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205269872","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198866220.001.0001","title":"Human Rights Litigation against Multinationals in Practice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Jurisdiction; Liability; Damages; Settlement (finance); Complicity; Harm; Relevance (law); Law; Business; Law and economics; Sociology; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.026085288513798977,"score_gpt":0.2932285839222297,"score_spread":0.26714329540843074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205269872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030427886,0.06418768,0.0069991043,0.14415315,0.0039187553,0.00008031529,0.000022951017,0.000102776066,0.7501074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5681753,0.043318473,0.006881811,0.07902069,0.004914236,0.00025282244,0.00005629461,0.00014671743,0.29723364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9804951,0.009667747,0.00080023945,0.0013375295,0.005122294,0.0025770825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98410994,0.012906982,0.0008497512,0.00063435826,0.00073797256,0.0007609994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018511983,0.0004715718,0.00070255727,0.0011674934,0.011300587,0.016162552,0.002054429,0.013743923,0.0148162935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02266085,0.00047665264,0.0005429819,0.0021695998,0.020421619,0.011627502,0.015030799,0.009450706,0.001620363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008135885,0.000036743928,0.0005503603,0.00013266846,0.000005999116,0.0015905995,0.029134406,0.00024391366,0.0001314096,0.9065826,0.03439414,0.027188929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010124444,0.000042443207,0.00066686404,0.001196097,0.0000053223853,0.0012591763,0.02691557,0.00029243837,0.00017500622,0.11506612,0.8543476,0.000023245006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005324093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008600324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018511983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065801707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062105027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09790188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206208231","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2015/v18i6a1117","title":"Editorial","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Democracy; Sociology; Political science; Safeguarding; Multiculturalism; Legal education; Politics","score_opus":0.009911963621447422,"score_gpt":0.3101963665386608,"score_spread":0.30028440291721337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206208231","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015025318,0.0049881404,0.00018708695,0.030922066,0.88220966,0.00007555904,0.000487027,0.00027045034,0.08070971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00227562,0.0066236253,0.00025635757,0.027926505,0.6700988,0.00007500942,0.00069584313,0.0002848336,0.29176345],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972133,0.0002719064,0.00024467058,0.00051792787,0.0014808362,0.00027140227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99135405,0.001277715,0.00045784732,0.0005882356,0.004738564,0.0015836147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018859459,0.0014616576,0.0012364738,0.0026946843,0.002332145,0.006837156,0.0020251917,0.004501661,0.28524715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012660299,0.0005000684,0.0011266919,0.0011231124,0.0010504579,0.0034519287,0.0018511792,0.004953873,0.18525942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010044749,0.0000069152984,0.000025251533,0.00007712826,0.000001981508,0.00004065556,0.000013370862,0.000007971758,0.000039942013,0.0003933584,0.98958194,0.009801435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005892209,0.000007468025,0.00010547097,0.0001485491,0.0000023465948,0.00006985194,0.000031495965,0.000014000064,0.000035687735,0.00028289392,0.99929285,0.0000035575308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001148675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020948877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28524715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002015839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025706799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206497214","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-84647-3_29","title":"Article 31: The Rights to Rest, Play, Recreation, and Cultural and Artistic Activities","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Children's well-being","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Recreation; Rest (music); Competition (biology); Aesthetics; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Art; Law; Medicine; Philosophy; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.012219610784861985,"score_gpt":0.2665343865141429,"score_spread":0.2543147757292809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206497214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001006668,0.007801474,0.00029831575,0.004587311,0.000594329,0.00001942773,0.00008283708,0.000012973268,0.9855967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028193356,0.0046785576,0.00027994966,0.001343345,0.0002527126,0.000041573476,0.000048311602,0.000022725357,0.96513957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976116,0.00006805409,0.0000060313714,0.000028974253,0.000080079866,0.000055628097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99987316,0.000058431193,0.000006735771,0.000011516894,0.000028114468,0.000021950264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039283675,0.00043236575,0.0002023371,0.00044665884,0.0025298041,0.0024605163,0.00032409828,0.0015852026,0.047235396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004976151,0.00016988195,0.00013572343,0.00062603276,0.0038539593,0.002186167,0.001154913,0.0022937134,0.0064006117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000086119535,0.000023550363,0.0001077113,0.000111844805,9.268847e-7,0.00012088614,0.0052304133,0.0001167909,0.0003160303,0.6375918,0.32660374,0.029767813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013829515,0.0000035983483,0.00026815096,0.00014706695,5.513837e-7,0.00007648835,0.0006798316,0.000020231842,0.00007076607,0.010766064,0.9879638,0.000002133875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021754015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05750089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047235396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021418792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018881802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15801817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206745800","doi":"10.1080/02582473.2021.2004215","title":"<i>Land, Law and Chiefs in Rural South Africa: Contested Histories and Current Struggles</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Historical Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Land rights; Land law; Law; Gender studies; Land tenure; Ethnology; Geography; History; Sociology; Archaeology; Agriculture","score_opus":0.022505975903520627,"score_gpt":0.2577970278198587,"score_spread":0.23529105191633806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206745800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36010683,0.06431368,0.00081241055,0.2988361,0.0019426692,0.0000913809,0.00021698813,0.000029060166,0.27365088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9161202,0.014349919,0.0003065264,0.01424601,0.0005779404,0.000078102654,0.00004650416,0.000040419545,0.05423441],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987128,0.0005596022,0.000042177067,0.00008013172,0.000088782275,0.0005165226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970727,0.002037753,0.0003321601,0.00004610722,0.00013014638,0.00038100977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022775452,0.00028780027,0.00028196684,0.0020220985,0.024047542,0.013936766,0.0012062564,0.005313896,0.013461207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051430305,0.0004371281,0.00017061702,0.004981752,0.022539048,0.010466232,0.00605384,0.004725684,0.00060647266],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025833891,0.000017543663,0.0023260429,0.0002697188,0.0000046157284,0.0013832912,0.64217436,0.00003985404,0.00041021596,0.3203896,0.023087092,0.009871969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044864046,0.000016229857,0.006074794,0.0004936665,0.0000053549234,0.00045836647,0.66845053,0.000032429005,0.00017111334,0.01180328,0.31247586,0.0000138953255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07195524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22969493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07195524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071163937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010899983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14307284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206757867","doi":"10.1017/9781108283618.010","title":"Remedies for Violations of Indigenous Rights","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Indigenous; Political science; Duty; Interim; Law and economics; Law; Declaration; Sociology","score_opus":0.03424107778291943,"score_gpt":0.25700268139465404,"score_spread":0.2227616036117346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206757867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036945958,0.009083961,0.008194568,0.015812423,0.0015757632,0.00018039986,0.000038428985,0.000116316616,0.9613036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23316906,0.011848774,0.011897417,0.008827736,0.001105773,0.0003369869,0.00006678013,0.000105082734,0.73264223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671483,0.001032073,0.0002008992,0.0003269866,0.0012608602,0.00046433232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998389,0.0008387788,0.00015562543,0.0002686985,0.00025589918,0.00009194624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031781874,0.00045060564,0.00037403876,0.0013557973,0.0036980917,0.0036620884,0.001637174,0.0045993268,0.017754544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007433993,0.00027525786,0.00052120315,0.0006121787,0.0111184055,0.0042720786,0.0042254976,0.005903593,0.0025557447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030583299,0.00001925155,0.000054597975,0.00012060769,0.0000034534962,0.00016866766,0.00331395,0.00019967319,0.00037103894,0.9487504,0.02133123,0.025664227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011517731,0.000037102865,0.00043803142,0.0006504029,0.000010585676,0.00041154423,0.0019362144,0.00030777152,0.00063692575,0.2251297,0.77040774,0.00002238668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005431578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009094856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017754544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033501878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069576385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059394896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206809556","doi":"10.47348/samlj/v33/i2a2","title":"Investigating the Need to Introduce Compulsory Interest Arbitration as a Method to Prevent Lengthy Strikes in South Africa","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Mercantile Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Harm; Order (exchange); Compulsory arbitration; Political science; Action (physics); Law; Business","score_opus":0.040935064742647874,"score_gpt":0.32856749089509674,"score_spread":0.2876324261524489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206809556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5251122,0.0059127226,0.012967688,0.23264375,0.0014809081,0.0021719374,0.00006309415,0.00008779836,0.21955995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95096624,0.0017337549,0.0048201852,0.028187092,0.00013436758,0.00036835665,0.00001500587,0.000030021632,0.013745083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826916,0.0087494245,0.001173144,0.0006166095,0.0022507065,0.0045186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9487136,0.036224607,0.0053105857,0.0012906742,0.0040240455,0.004436513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025565617,0.000273747,0.00044563305,0.0012603903,0.010092668,0.010520709,0.0027680392,0.008384211,0.0073010186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07009959,0.0006482728,0.0006012801,0.0009302217,0.0053034667,0.0070501333,0.0076048793,0.008204655,0.00045895338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037214477,0.0011160548,0.031586334,0.0031000501,0.0001091177,0.009121279,0.21173558,0.0020627305,0.011776675,0.58469933,0.02087812,0.12344252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047109136,0.0012757601,0.06244488,0.006114956,0.00027274195,0.0026083933,0.32237536,0.00426138,0.006312366,0.056735065,0.53687906,0.0002490162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03543073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0676534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03543073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010863589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041606843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1352055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4207014272","doi":"10.1177/00420980211065895","title":"Making Mangaung Metro: The politics of metropolitan reform in a South African secondary city","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Urban Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metropolitan area; Politics; Corporate governance; Economic growth; Public administration; Political science; Local government; Government (linguistics); Urbanization; Municipal services; Business; Geography; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.08052264952683977,"score_gpt":0.3594413239580355,"score_spread":0.2789186744311958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4207014272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8093475,0.0020401073,0.0011719039,0.060803734,0.00018529873,0.00012459377,0.000040943854,0.000013091548,0.12627266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98471284,0.0004679977,0.00027950323,0.0012714971,0.000021595255,0.00002961853,0.000006057998,0.000007475494,0.013203404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984818,0.0007076849,0.00002686949,0.000077378776,0.000088457615,0.0006178391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988176,0.0004525071,0.00016397914,0.00005630411,0.00010658854,0.00040296954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020844343,0.00019587947,0.00017775869,0.00061017496,0.020544458,0.0043196296,0.0004702191,0.0019557416,0.0052957474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030736143,0.0002840496,0.0001929834,0.0009454024,0.013817757,0.0030978967,0.0052421526,0.0033465775,0.00019226562],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052101754,0.00003845606,0.005443984,0.00013347503,0.000009509142,0.0033749528,0.31630304,0.00044564082,0.0015649977,0.65331686,0.00894242,0.010374585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027865643,0.0000820604,0.020004118,0.00036490557,0.000022658625,0.00060681364,0.45507032,0.0008451042,0.0012189572,0.037699956,0.4840036,0.00005369604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06686851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15833177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06686851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011330973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008208587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13295859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211191022","doi":"10.1002/iir.1243","title":"Various Aspects to Consider with Regard to Special Insolvency Rules for Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprises in South Africa","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Business; Small and medium-sized enterprises; Industrial organization; Finance","score_opus":0.07918310268532958,"score_gpt":0.3542193387217083,"score_spread":0.2750362360363787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211191022","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08207743,0.3466762,0.0021683527,0.34642288,0.0061966274,0.00037514113,0.00040564785,0.000056204422,0.21562149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62992984,0.20195162,0.00551303,0.13274896,0.0035364851,0.00047726565,0.0004030814,0.00007767992,0.025362138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98984843,0.0023300601,0.0017619854,0.00059601053,0.0025798916,0.0028836338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9549876,0.03013604,0.005647984,0.00075531384,0.0069927303,0.0014803115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020171551,0.00044003857,0.0008771436,0.004871054,0.0046708407,0.015568673,0.0024653138,0.009366091,0.0034594398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05861385,0.0006709484,0.0008557551,0.006520689,0.0061267167,0.007140152,0.0031418055,0.010343424,0.000259355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011047163,0.00013682559,0.008526444,0.0070175626,0.00014782582,0.0041236184,0.020961573,0.0009757519,0.002172232,0.7344009,0.084492065,0.13693465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009089564,0.000110244895,0.04219156,0.021693433,0.0002990851,0.0017116286,0.024716683,0.000339874,0.0014561969,0.04482482,0.8623927,0.00017292575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047926966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.079406664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047926966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007941434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03397098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106678665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212773880","doi":"10.1002/div.1774","title":"Ranking the 2004 Canadian Dividend Achievers","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mergent s Dividend Achievers","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dividend; Ranking (information retrieval); Citation; Business; Information retrieval; Library science; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.020661979960902684,"score_gpt":0.2942131860790036,"score_spread":0.2735512061181009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212773880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52443475,0.0029053104,0.0012717332,0.028415006,0.0005455091,0.0002407102,0.009509403,0.0002439542,0.43243363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85038805,0.0010445181,0.0016520793,0.0011067064,0.00006035745,0.00006959023,0.0030085351,0.00004607786,0.14262412],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99588287,0.00015972971,0.00005220349,0.00013811543,0.002523628,0.0012435263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99315417,0.00020685056,0.0002299735,0.00008298777,0.0040053795,0.002320704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026227664,0.0004674539,0.00036831814,0.005385778,0.0065538404,0.00393948,0.0007345886,0.000929053,0.008211957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006443836,0.00019452821,0.0002806398,0.004609946,0.0008355061,0.0008959561,0.001182993,0.0014759937,0.0009952713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038779536,0.00027466626,0.17242096,0.00014252093,0.000062441526,0.00017678435,0.0034403966,0.0026446206,0.00080905546,0.10175501,0.5077711,0.21011473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007009275,0.00014993531,0.49398604,0.00011737196,0.000044834338,0.00006128671,0.011580633,0.0032958332,0.0018852458,0.002864464,0.48582867,0.000115571005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96691215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99153346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048126087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048126087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0869313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34918082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212904494","doi":"10.1515/npf-2021-0049","title":"Challenges to Nonprofit Organization Participation in Social and Development Policy Planning in South Africa","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nonprofit Policy Forum","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Sustainable development; Economic growth; Corporate governance; Political science; Public administration; Social Welfare; Democracy; Public relations; Business; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.08316715712304859,"score_gpt":0.38095033560214925,"score_spread":0.29778317847910063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212904494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49451125,0.0069302525,0.0062268893,0.32945782,0.00083275535,0.0012717333,0.00015130914,0.000068558715,0.1605494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839499,0.0020379687,0.0019579637,0.0049999263,0.00010732645,0.00042842218,0.000047549533,0.000028716555,0.0064423024],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94789326,0.035155278,0.0014796573,0.0011163383,0.00304224,0.011313127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91448146,0.05855144,0.0051472504,0.0024145828,0.004141485,0.015263785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06944505,0.00057156733,0.0005611946,0.0023989712,0.021716487,0.01978392,0.0040193787,0.0062182033,0.015316579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051760495,0.0008264596,0.0005989462,0.0030149664,0.01508004,0.010751745,0.029681936,0.0062426375,0.000978255],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015668389,0.00044129632,0.01844302,0.0020278734,0.000092303875,0.005065341,0.5171551,0.0021536963,0.0014287431,0.28344485,0.028291725,0.14129937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051489336,0.00012228069,0.010668707,0.0028157758,0.000017390543,0.0005080352,0.7279897,0.0009858056,0.00040785156,0.048455764,0.20793058,0.000046742283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023052698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02457019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06944505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016827518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.074126445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36726493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220654244","doi":"10.1163/17087384-bja10064","title":"Habeas Corpus as a Remedy for Deprivation of the Right to Personal Liberty: Contemporary Developments in Lesotho","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Habeas corpus; Writ; Law; Political science; Enforcement; Constitutional right; Judicial review; Constitution","score_opus":0.055753344791364075,"score_gpt":0.34171092834650907,"score_spread":0.285957583555145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220654244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41713935,0.033339124,0.002793462,0.060972728,0.0008578589,0.0004117356,0.00022450047,0.00008987537,0.48417136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9575335,0.007955097,0.0023204393,0.0044470746,0.00021232481,0.00014224462,0.0000479696,0.00002683163,0.02731452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994419,0.00019721479,0.00003766729,0.000052150674,0.00012513687,0.00014590508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988954,0.0005979595,0.00014191383,0.000067344656,0.00017313566,0.00012421307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014185639,0.00024176583,0.0002424861,0.0017774277,0.0065244553,0.004038707,0.0008207185,0.0014235257,0.008769599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017067101,0.00023999008,0.000121905534,0.0016224625,0.009801988,0.0020200692,0.0027699368,0.002175407,0.0002968133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008609415,0.00011904164,0.0039023822,0.0013780649,0.000009483782,0.0041022315,0.062826835,0.00028740885,0.004989502,0.79271317,0.009511785,0.12007397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005274256,0.00017952602,0.027615335,0.0031709613,0.00004661889,0.0021283154,0.079652764,0.00089911954,0.002973654,0.06612018,0.8170542,0.000106649226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027003333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061650593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027003333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00536191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007815312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05369234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220911915","doi":"10.1163/17087384-bja10063","title":"A Future of Justice Inclusion: Examining Access to Justice in South Africa through the ‘Ethic of Care’ and ‘Complexity’","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Concreteness; Economic Justice; Inclusion (mineral); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.12882707152831185,"score_gpt":0.38936405628928,"score_spread":0.26053698476096815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220911915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85280657,0.00614953,0.0021515428,0.06074355,0.000102634476,0.0000828656,0.000048414284,0.000005582617,0.077909194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978962,0.0009823524,0.00022186678,0.00040480308,0.000010159811,0.000023738867,0.0000039626066,0.0000019673016,0.00045505917],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99420446,0.004079866,0.00011601696,0.00022861584,0.0004630206,0.0009079506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99213237,0.005212967,0.0013070336,0.00019548663,0.0004658048,0.0006864337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006609999,0.0003577803,0.00035890425,0.0029601762,0.013306104,0.010369043,0.0009230693,0.002003953,0.0032591235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008727698,0.0002868743,0.00045366137,0.0027296115,0.038096167,0.017299771,0.012932872,0.0041561667,0.00012390109],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023119885,0.00003653556,0.010132395,0.00021296994,0.000010313862,0.00053773675,0.7293374,0.00016225975,0.00023111232,0.2510879,0.00082287454,0.0074054436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030414635,0.000025445397,0.0077469205,0.00054123235,0.000009056532,0.00018631534,0.9378341,0.00023047873,0.00009439751,0.041488934,0.011826063,0.00001396944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022173552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023655126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022173552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012718803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01261767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09228176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221075346","doi":"10.1163/17087384-bja10062","title":"The Imperative of Engendering an Egalitarian Legal Framework for the Protection of Female Employees’ Rights in Nigeria","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Convention; Law; Political science; Linguistic rights; Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women; Declaration; Constitution; Right to property; International law; Charter; Remuneration; Fundamental rights","score_opus":0.06608425698013083,"score_gpt":0.3746722905388958,"score_spread":0.30858803355876496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221075346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19771224,0.011192037,0.0142242825,0.23475097,0.0020898597,0.00021020416,0.00006167885,0.00003532416,0.53972346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.963392,0.0017009807,0.0038671133,0.012259343,0.00030088847,0.000108968336,0.00001182747,0.000008957582,0.01834994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99495935,0.0026712595,0.00033129426,0.00038430459,0.00083691085,0.00081687974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99298286,0.0040802015,0.00085692387,0.00045657516,0.001044058,0.00057941215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010635027,0.00015567301,0.00027784813,0.00054480904,0.0052384664,0.006670044,0.0006187547,0.003923865,0.0018121655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009758039,0.00024223354,0.0001445977,0.0003269849,0.0119539825,0.0031196184,0.0028140014,0.004822343,0.0002513008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009614448,0.000021815613,0.0012539587,0.000050584997,0.0000016514854,0.00029926305,0.014094873,0.00011328854,0.00041543724,0.9696148,0.0035002965,0.010624302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032257863,0.0001045108,0.0070008934,0.0033801184,0.000022089485,0.0007744025,0.059097532,0.000991645,0.0018010715,0.45959243,0.46712682,0.0000761672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010153562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013182219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010635027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002888743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012953079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056244075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224863990","doi":"10.1163/17087384-bja10065","title":"Zimbabwe’s Contribution to the Transnational Judicial Dialogue on Corporal Punishment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporal punishment; Human rights; Law; Commonwealth; Political science; Jurisprudence; Norm (philosophy); Victory; International law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.0418768195586337,"score_gpt":0.3361045951574651,"score_spread":0.2942277755988314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224863990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31030044,0.041175716,0.006279237,0.263347,0.0013051818,0.00020897448,0.0000992456,0.0000403358,0.37724394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777075,0.0029879378,0.0009619057,0.0094135245,0.00015651621,0.00006649535,0.000009626168,0.000013458696,0.008683032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918641,0.0042229136,0.00034205551,0.0004847289,0.0007872024,0.00229904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99221873,0.0060213306,0.00056259724,0.00046587823,0.00037448577,0.00035705222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010010125,0.00032966773,0.00033041375,0.0018653362,0.013179142,0.010521761,0.0011693761,0.0049563083,0.004600069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014131418,0.000605087,0.00023978903,0.0015139867,0.018503224,0.0048492276,0.010058497,0.008579951,0.00018553578],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025560686,0.00002058573,0.0017934436,0.0001899412,0.000018697441,0.0020308914,0.10959147,0.00016194402,0.0017830858,0.8523132,0.0072956868,0.024775462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003540114,0.0000656569,0.019324388,0.0024667052,0.000054504002,0.0010255376,0.07523395,0.0008393727,0.001970985,0.11051951,0.78836554,0.00009852453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.063572116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.129282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063572116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013472611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010031299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12640417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229954982","doi":"10.1002/div.1347","title":"Great‐West Lifeco Inc.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mergent s Dividend Achievers","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reinsurance; Life insurance; Business; Health insurance; Financial services; Finance; West virginia; Actuarial science; Economic growth; Economics; Geography; Health care","score_opus":0.025619022424710026,"score_gpt":0.3062733998175411,"score_spread":0.28065437739283106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229954982","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00069650705,0.0009532119,0.00086484436,0.00072681135,0.00021818653,0.0000491378,0.0022530723,0.002312328,0.991926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024871617,0.00074674404,0.0005958604,0.0002627708,0.000044089025,0.000024869685,0.0014383084,0.00047746152,0.99392277],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995536,0.000024864057,0.000023386774,0.00008845947,0.0002565892,0.00005310011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989483,0.000117983116,0.00008002849,0.00018850519,0.0003592619,0.00030595312],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032842238,0.0006500222,0.0003366611,0.0020550555,0.0008485128,0.0026248007,0.00082949555,0.0010881604,0.7923068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016302072,0.00052282447,0.00024764406,0.0017929672,0.00038575436,0.0022570472,0.0015721575,0.00096380257,0.6432597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005989396,0.00005185333,0.00050084747,0.00017597855,0.0000036392798,0.000114158254,0.000111261164,0.00004598303,0.000756599,0.0059958748,0.7641599,0.22802408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071413306,0.000010610415,0.0005063305,0.000070679416,0.0000026397638,0.00015356208,0.000045394943,0.000052139305,0.00019940069,0.00063344906,0.9983152,0.000003390888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050596553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01748468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7923068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006140876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014107199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29624915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230248784","doi":"10.20474/jahss-2.3.3","title":"Animals: ‘objects’ or ‘sentient beings’? A comparative perspective of the South African law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Environmental ethics; Law; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08617310543616923,"score_gpt":0.3768089567178542,"score_spread":0.29063585128168495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230248784","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18365133,0.05352638,0.0076415422,0.06770646,0.0006124023,0.000072860246,0.00006831577,0.000011464421,0.6867093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97383094,0.011238459,0.0012980052,0.0027801648,0.00013235435,0.000056334506,0.000017739543,0.000014731867,0.01063122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963611,0.0023728076,0.00010711413,0.00019847,0.0004579843,0.00050251745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970607,0.0020225244,0.0003741551,0.0001476652,0.0002679219,0.00012703825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048780995,0.0004310945,0.0005067634,0.0035043478,0.008125884,0.0077433083,0.0007311455,0.0028653366,0.0046540783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006214209,0.00033448933,0.00030151277,0.0033579234,0.042205434,0.013257914,0.004730214,0.0034166232,0.00031300826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067963124,0.0000047504536,0.00023617975,0.000067483605,0.000002679771,0.00016197571,0.048128787,0.000023907192,0.00012283603,0.94718695,0.0005221313,0.0035355058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015611207,0.000057169305,0.008412339,0.0020741518,0.000032330456,0.00080333825,0.2154629,0.00027415264,0.0005873981,0.4015982,0.37063658,0.000045840985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014692826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01790821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014692826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0078059146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004246492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056636155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233694023","doi":"10.7202/1021949ar","title":"Renonciation aux représailles et recours en dommages","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03129338562044258,"score_gpt":0.3297596516628757,"score_spread":0.2984662660424331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233694023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41197154,0.0042475085,0.005641491,0.109030284,0.0011161255,0.00009286656,0.00013580512,0.000070933245,0.46769342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8259786,0.000738822,0.00090351887,0.004727322,0.00016224085,0.00004695828,0.000027250506,0.00007498239,0.16734026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838637,0.008183848,0.00046268717,0.0009924718,0.0033540644,0.0031432363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856946,0.0062384484,0.0022419458,0.0013601966,0.002755515,0.0017092592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010374338,0.00027102255,0.00028130016,0.0009566848,0.014914992,0.008315924,0.0015679648,0.004046428,0.018648809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02889215,0.0004150411,0.0002466885,0.00094976265,0.01431185,0.0053650946,0.0068638558,0.005251939,0.0023419566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059558388,0.000074267446,0.011782058,0.000087516535,0.00001104441,0.0019576775,0.45822093,0.000114779374,0.0016359219,0.46506515,0.022050925,0.03894014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010620683,0.00004982642,0.016876476,0.00044963896,0.000012508627,0.0008814207,0.32379442,0.00018459781,0.001801305,0.02845651,0.6274262,0.000056531095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036149535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07065282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036149535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008345481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00775931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071878254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234293503","doi":"10.1177/002071520004100107","title":"Democratic Local Government and Responsiveness: Lessons from Zimbabwe and Tanzania","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Comparative Sociology","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tanzania; Democracy; Local government; Political science; Government (linguistics); Development economics; Economic growth; Public administration; Socioeconomics; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.03747424124821119,"score_gpt":0.3817108811857446,"score_spread":0.3442366399375334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234293503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9256964,0.002615082,0.0007556577,0.01512192,0.000031706608,0.000042942833,0.00006328746,0.000009347175,0.055663686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99766564,0.00052330043,0.00010090801,0.0002807096,0.0000057114435,0.00001527127,0.000010466592,0.0000041395047,0.0013938154],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843234,0.00081599545,0.00002346074,0.000048165497,0.000066568806,0.0006135036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99582833,0.0032931352,0.00026700954,0.00009846432,0.00018095132,0.00033213492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026151026,0.00026312665,0.00042467727,0.0014468526,0.007493525,0.0048867664,0.0008541311,0.0013512039,0.00661675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007882305,0.00028803578,0.00023464223,0.003400844,0.009391871,0.003692476,0.004198062,0.0025896465,0.00018611854],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024739152,0.00020772968,0.041048996,0.0002563262,0.00004268216,0.003716384,0.5776109,0.0009815765,0.0005596418,0.33239007,0.0044873958,0.038450945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012549035,0.00014253563,0.094111845,0.00080926396,0.00008102667,0.00038071882,0.8046778,0.0011125864,0.0003796418,0.052782536,0.045339398,0.000057119425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20202672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3543527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20202672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0089402525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057534534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40170157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235019799","doi":"10.1002/div.1728","title":"Great‐West Lifeco Inc.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mergent s Dividend Achievers","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reinsurance; Life insurance; Business; Health insurance; Financial services; Finance; Actuarial science; Economic growth; Economics; Health care","score_opus":0.025619022424710026,"score_gpt":0.3062733998175411,"score_spread":0.28065437739283106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235019799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00069650705,0.0009532119,0.00086484436,0.00072681135,0.00021818653,0.0000491378,0.0022530723,0.002312328,0.991926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024871617,0.00074674404,0.0005958604,0.0002627708,0.000044089025,0.000024869685,0.0014383084,0.00047746152,0.99392277],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995536,0.000024864057,0.000023386774,0.00008845947,0.0002565892,0.00005310011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989483,0.000117983116,0.00008002849,0.00018850519,0.0003592619,0.00030595312],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032842238,0.0006500222,0.0003366611,0.0020550555,0.0008485128,0.0026248007,0.00082949555,0.0010881604,0.7923068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016302072,0.00052282447,0.00024764406,0.0017929672,0.00038575436,0.0022570472,0.0015721575,0.00096380257,0.6432597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005989396,0.00005185333,0.00050084747,0.00017597855,0.0000036392798,0.000114158254,0.000111261164,0.00004598303,0.000756599,0.0059958748,0.7641599,0.22802408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071413306,0.000010610415,0.0005063305,0.000070679416,0.0000026397638,0.00015356208,0.000045394943,0.000052139305,0.00019940069,0.00063344906,0.9983152,0.000003390888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050596553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01748468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7923068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006140876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014107199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29624915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235400449","doi":"10.1787/fin_sme_ent-2018-48-en","title":"South Africa","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Financing SMEs and entrepreneurs","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Accommodation; Geography; Agricultural economics; Business; Retail trade; Socioeconomics; Economics; Commerce; Archaeology","score_opus":0.026105041955087477,"score_gpt":0.2561022490330542,"score_spread":0.2299972070779667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235400449","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003489777,0.01193338,0.00085654034,0.004244979,0.0011183203,0.00011941975,0.0011239855,0.00020432132,0.9769092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022673273,0.010827362,0.0014999303,0.0012977534,0.0001717547,0.00010876178,0.0006633682,0.00016063283,0.9625971],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997893,0.00003306823,0.00001086818,0.000047361642,0.00005109326,0.00006834589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99983406,0.000029551087,0.00001887914,0.000018158888,0.000058325742,0.000041063515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024176006,0.0008998077,0.00022304538,0.0010385163,0.0021274842,0.0031444589,0.0005788957,0.0010417134,0.25990638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070209784,0.00032150213,0.00024004547,0.0016811858,0.00059806113,0.0029647197,0.002007266,0.00093121256,0.06540514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049735907,0.0000325561,0.0005738761,0.0012007267,0.0000073032447,0.0014042464,0.0052423063,0.00013811117,0.0023305526,0.14199662,0.5122327,0.33479118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018885243,0.0000032070022,0.00021340784,0.00007132564,8.9253865e-7,0.0002515041,0.00025288897,0.00000716021,0.000104894505,0.0010616818,0.9980292,0.0000018227627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008532564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01785557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25990638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020685694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025653974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86947346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236308964","doi":"10.7765/msi/9781526119704.13","title":"Chapter 12: ‘Because it does not make sense’: sovereignty’s power in the case of Delgamuukw v. The Queen 1997","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Manchester University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Supreme court; Law; Indigenous; Political science; Injustice; Power (physics); Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04708668175415881,"score_gpt":0.2654197548989816,"score_spread":0.2183330731448228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236308964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018622065,0.022117,0.0007609632,0.03956626,0.00066778855,0.000046542016,0.00005196967,0.00001176432,0.91815567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45893934,0.009570823,0.0006464717,0.021544151,0.00034705937,0.00012540753,0.0000556327,0.00006546163,0.50870556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983479,0.00051780336,0.000040969408,0.0001580888,0.0004708906,0.00046433436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918884,0.000549753,0.00003571006,0.000034402743,0.00012133081,0.00006986925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016170378,0.0003399926,0.00031258364,0.00049819314,0.012639759,0.007314083,0.0013648649,0.005232397,0.00771769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021696493,0.0004303667,0.00028819236,0.00085106347,0.017135343,0.0035111194,0.0025373357,0.008134167,0.00092000765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005949702,0.000009767356,0.0002461047,0.00005997684,0.000002916607,0.00075391104,0.036857206,0.000060558606,0.00014441571,0.8964951,0.060521103,0.004843116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010560666,0.000008506541,0.0012123439,0.000523432,0.000009955726,0.00037388311,0.018061055,0.000104392886,0.000409082,0.07721386,0.9020506,0.000022285894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2819771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44995084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2819771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021950671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017230773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56067157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236421334","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v13i3.63674","title":"Rethinking Volks V Robinson: The Implications of Applying a \"Contextaulised Choice Model\" to Prospective South African Domestic Partnerships Legislation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); General partnership; Sine qua non; Duty; Law; Legislation; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Limited partnership; Sociology; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.07185191166909422,"score_gpt":0.316219953803129,"score_spread":0.2443680421340348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236421334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13610972,0.004865988,0.045792505,0.38159996,0.001594054,0.00048558586,0.00012907165,0.00009264396,0.42933047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95073384,0.0008246795,0.005841962,0.030026358,0.0002376527,0.00019096168,0.000011919453,0.000029857672,0.012102765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9770159,0.014432611,0.00057820807,0.0018558836,0.0041218856,0.0019955416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979354,0.017247185,0.0007367063,0.00095874176,0.0010133123,0.00069006527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029500304,0.00044044314,0.0007101128,0.0011920439,0.0070673986,0.009237305,0.0033353376,0.012021569,0.0036331979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032819137,0.00049793225,0.0008495512,0.0011162264,0.04401626,0.009795219,0.009096893,0.01122809,0.0003152553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027898102,0.0000021284484,0.000050984017,0.000008401912,0.0000012066771,0.00005098888,0.0020855847,0.00008532656,0.000024102423,0.996636,0.00051514286,0.0005373494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008082081,0.00006958398,0.00069387164,0.00041233219,0.000029266334,0.00016838207,0.0075434037,0.0027357407,0.00057477015,0.89534926,0.09226934,0.0000731762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048889678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0626924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048889678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013858232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01978139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15601438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238421790","doi":"10.4324/9780203126653","title":"Vindicating Socio-Economic Rights","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Enforcement; Context (archaeology); Fundamental rights; Argument (complex analysis); International human rights law; Linguistic rights; Reservation of rights; Covenant; Right to property; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.02112629957064237,"score_gpt":0.31242794763332327,"score_spread":0.2913016480626809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238421790","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14420603,0.0029577098,0.011356364,0.043160312,0.0006039055,0.00010215642,0.000044847744,0.000061602936,0.7975071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684932,0.0006942984,0.0016295152,0.004528882,0.000083697385,0.000047529422,0.0000145344975,0.0000231083,0.02448526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98213184,0.008675407,0.0006139628,0.0016241972,0.0033168115,0.0036377744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933923,0.002904251,0.00093929085,0.0013314072,0.0008136882,0.00061906734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011187116,0.00032493795,0.00051860913,0.0010233432,0.011334681,0.01271857,0.0018282754,0.003145272,0.0039255894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015228065,0.00027390884,0.00038604392,0.00097165385,0.06391272,0.006822275,0.012329154,0.0068302597,0.0006253324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041340995,0.000004732921,0.00031646225,0.000014655062,0.0000018253127,0.00007518351,0.0151803335,0.000043443426,0.00017513179,0.97874033,0.00075099384,0.004692792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027084885,0.00008689559,0.0028172033,0.0005697858,0.000025325444,0.00033691345,0.03553785,0.00041233384,0.0019238426,0.5015324,0.45667523,0.000055207496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016493358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025517974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016493358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008962347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01518509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0650267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238801568","doi":"10.14426/ahmr.v3i2.824","title":"Benign Neglect or Active Destruction? A Critical Analysis of Refugee and Informal Sector Policy and Practice in South Africa","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AFRICAN HUMAN MOBILITY REVIEW","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Balsillie School of International Affairs","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Bureaucracy; Political science; Livelihood; Neglect; Corporate governance; Economic growth; Confusion; Poverty; Development economics; Law; Economics; Geography; Management","score_opus":0.05957333138471543,"score_gpt":0.4227461964927873,"score_spread":0.36317286510807184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238801568","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20670965,0.33246616,0.001250794,0.35593402,0.0010974118,0.00022664222,0.000052587726,0.000013472956,0.102249235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87746626,0.10432983,0.00047471165,0.01096212,0.00033613943,0.00016671814,0.000016752323,0.000018268778,0.0062291753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98570096,0.010173841,0.0004949547,0.00040082366,0.0011624001,0.0020671256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793026,0.016645083,0.0016845098,0.00032644128,0.0011621959,0.0008792859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02242321,0.00041285067,0.00069504103,0.0044204616,0.012265168,0.012302501,0.001794833,0.0058215405,0.0031789565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02916684,0.00045634853,0.00029848673,0.00655177,0.030931935,0.010396592,0.007483233,0.0051024104,0.00019141487],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002577318,0.000039742794,0.0010649075,0.0014730605,0.000014897807,0.0011903535,0.41012448,0.00023122967,0.00021266201,0.5458755,0.008019336,0.03172819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001819646,0.0000708244,0.005201366,0.0078196805,0.00002036444,0.0004110356,0.66506606,0.0001232801,0.00024117145,0.032942925,0.28805158,0.000033479526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047673896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056507513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047673896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02413807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035313006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17513478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238816770","doi":"10.1002/div.5388","title":"Great‐West Lifeco Inc.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mergent s Dividend Achievers","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reinsurance; Subsidiary; Life insurance; Business; Health insurance; Finance; Plan (archaeology); Actuarial science; Economics; Economic growth; Health care; Multinational corporation; Geography","score_opus":0.01673982754958098,"score_gpt":0.2839205626527571,"score_spread":0.26718073510317614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238816770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008883161,0.0012055421,0.0010434889,0.000724109,0.00023496273,0.00005738926,0.0022239746,0.0021796057,0.9914426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029468671,0.0008133504,0.00072873576,0.0002591998,0.00004146244,0.000027614722,0.0013361882,0.00045231511,0.9933943],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958175,0.00002559579,0.000021874748,0.00008598806,0.0002353597,0.000049449194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989913,0.00012451156,0.0000771828,0.00018180085,0.00031786892,0.00030731177],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031698798,0.0006198062,0.00033846067,0.0018678858,0.0007304765,0.0020657512,0.0008044201,0.0009886506,0.7941431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014965186,0.0005015353,0.00025399338,0.0015288811,0.00035656607,0.0018600957,0.0014574747,0.0008987359,0.6173467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071476614,0.00006213308,0.0006257976,0.00021306459,0.0000044180733,0.00015674271,0.00012177601,0.00004946698,0.0011541352,0.0057394747,0.6927871,0.2990144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008747134,0.000014746827,0.0007012687,0.0000804008,0.0000032175017,0.0002207745,0.000046561403,0.00006178681,0.00023763363,0.0005510064,0.9980703,0.000003662488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042957887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015758958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7941431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005162671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011501416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29362988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243984867","doi":"10.7202/1021680ar","title":"Damages awarded by Arbitration Board — Application for certiorari to quash award — Wether board has power to award and assess damages","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Law; Dispose pattern; Arbitration; Jurisdiction; Economic Justice; Business; Punitive damages; Liability; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.03737503824203407,"score_gpt":0.31851796057445725,"score_spread":0.28114292233242316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243984867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03187333,0.0030156497,0.0050817532,0.06855208,0.007876593,0.0010634647,0.00075146684,0.00067051227,0.88111514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25518185,0.0011179125,0.004283893,0.025766242,0.0036668137,0.0004993472,0.00063276186,0.00038902552,0.7084622],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98850656,0.0016410195,0.00079041976,0.0012097378,0.005460602,0.002391623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956137,0.000877246,0.00049274764,0.00039786578,0.0021315156,0.00048690182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005972783,0.00064076664,0.0008764208,0.0027165574,0.0077058496,0.007658007,0.0018342851,0.009570281,0.048682213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015637372,0.0005548656,0.00088971,0.0010952684,0.0029612714,0.0025991574,0.0043703485,0.0059966054,0.01649154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003793154,0.00027417217,0.00577271,0.00020726987,0.000094325995,0.0016916723,0.0026114718,0.0002627432,0.006747087,0.24077941,0.6742231,0.06695671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011108777,0.00019946395,0.011618269,0.00012889714,0.000054856195,0.0008443564,0.0011904216,0.0007296857,0.0028553626,0.020109352,0.96204233,0.00011591889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019345736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034679342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048682213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003987147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006414525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16285825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245180425","doi":"10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-4208-0007","title":"notes-for-a-speech-by-edward-broadbent-president-international-centre-for-human-rights-and-democratic-development-to-canadian-bar-association-london-england-barbican-centre-sept-25-1990-8-pp","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Human Rights Documents online","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Human rights; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.01805327747516768,"score_gpt":0.3235390848281612,"score_spread":0.3054858073529935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245180425","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013399844,0.00005631582,0.00004714616,0.00016120242,0.00008665141,0.0000111594,0.9977609,0.000513796,0.0012289538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0004069906,0.000081993356,0.00018134502,0.00009149358,0.000018292401,0.000054082626,0.9959194,0.00016972788,0.0030767622],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993703,0.000110289846,0.000059972925,0.0001547803,0.00016402139,0.00014067341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976876,0.0005506903,0.00017877667,0.0006199602,0.00047981887,0.00048323566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012982652,0.002158986,0.0011590713,0.0028779868,0.00091018796,0.003535594,0.002113515,0.0018046631,0.1978444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055375826,0.0006893346,0.0011859337,0.0037663402,0.0006530439,0.0021786017,0.0027632115,0.0019289219,0.32311195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024926578,0.000009398355,0.00036251722,0.00012855606,0.0000058960427,0.0000064331875,0.000012306305,0.00005840368,0.00003335634,0.00012848742,0.9980185,0.0012113838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016365798,0.000013331496,0.0032455917,0.00020944336,0.0000112633925,0.000026570051,0.00011705839,0.00032175606,0.00025554548,0.00059062015,0.99502546,0.000019698296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023348013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053845827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1978444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012611456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020326036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66185546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248643579","doi":"10.7202/1021684ar","title":"Right for employees working for an employer outside the limits of the City of Montreal, to absent themselves for two hours, without loss of pay, in order to vote as electors on the City of Montreal elections — Applications of article 328 of the Charter of the City of Montreal","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Salary; Obligation; Work (physics); Law; Order (exchange); Political science; Business; Engineering; Finance; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.04129080020596097,"score_gpt":0.3222224253999829,"score_spread":0.28093162519402193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248643579","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020106722,0.008977121,0.00073256716,0.11406679,0.0026242735,0.00044942656,0.0016287827,0.0001373428,0.85127693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17316431,0.0021366766,0.0011777881,0.030337343,0.0009877674,0.0003955056,0.0003456699,0.00007604129,0.79137886],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974253,0.00031325553,0.00009952681,0.00028395522,0.0008395658,0.0010384601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841416,0.0003813476,0.00011943868,0.00012658865,0.0006706273,0.00028771753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018119981,0.0007549896,0.00036442274,0.00069640647,0.015546764,0.0057761404,0.002060339,0.009096033,0.017277217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051249736,0.00082785473,0.00045414595,0.0009435977,0.006610854,0.0013486011,0.0021151025,0.0067626336,0.001967003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005679524,0.000057553843,0.0020963459,0.00006455001,0.0000111087265,0.00065816904,0.004763941,0.00022453828,0.000964429,0.330887,0.6489061,0.011309418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050805993,0.000025845136,0.011010676,0.00008136198,0.000010401787,0.000104073886,0.0015776524,0.00012071803,0.00029859683,0.0046225516,0.9820441,0.000053350705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9147529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9635599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0852471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021255208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045684706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17149824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250119383","doi":"10.1017/s0021853701457938","title":"TWENTIETH-CENTURY SWAZILAND <i>When the Sleeping Grass Awakens: Land and Power in Swaziland</i>. By R<scp>ICHARD </scp>L<scp>EVIN</scp>. Johannesburg: University of Witwatersrand Press, 1997. Pp. 290. SA Rand 98.94 (<scp>ISBN</scp> 1-86814-301-5).","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of African History","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); History; Archaeology; Economic history","score_opus":0.012124313984791675,"score_gpt":0.21353790170005468,"score_spread":0.20141358771526302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250119383","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055614956,0.65398866,0.00035756466,0.12894845,0.0020470342,0.000028353794,0.0006622647,0.000033851524,0.15831883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42923146,0.30905187,0.0006451043,0.0053174305,0.000753966,0.00005259474,0.0005081283,0.000066361565,0.254373],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99986446,0.000038420916,0.000008651434,0.000017267103,0.0000259529,0.000045100904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998896,0.000034977824,0.000031073003,0.0000065417908,0.000016368154,0.000021399199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003332594,0.0004213429,0.00019955703,0.00086979254,0.002606871,0.0028647222,0.00047409444,0.001639237,0.017107833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005900729,0.0004136125,0.00012000778,0.003196405,0.0038787462,0.004142794,0.0012983469,0.00126532,0.0021319392],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009711695,0.000049304745,0.0044881697,0.0011691097,0.000031690834,0.0015192551,0.16549686,0.00014374858,0.0013801897,0.19497743,0.48471615,0.14593108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073589176,0.0000105212375,0.010700355,0.0007818351,0.000008074948,0.00030770557,0.029313687,0.00001679161,0.00022243794,0.0069114664,0.95171076,0.000008908708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.105149366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29904208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.105149366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035994705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023778195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20907462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250952640","doi":"10.14426/ahmr.v3i2.830","title":"Security Risk and Xenophobia in the Urban Informal Sector","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AFRICAN HUMAN MOBILITY REVIEW","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Balsillie School of International Affairs","funders":"","keywords":"Xenophobia; Informal sector; Victimisation; Survey data collection; Political science; Refugee; Migrant workers; Security forces; Criminology; Development economics; Sociology; Economic growth; Racism; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.034183864420811,"score_gpt":0.3478570658549397,"score_spread":0.3136732014341287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250952640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8973463,0.043797705,0.000285213,0.015517495,0.00007592979,0.000020516445,0.000020320338,0.0000038117807,0.04293265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98802817,0.010779252,0.000031530308,0.00028354258,0.000023103557,0.0000049840874,0.000003132956,9.3353174e-7,0.00084544084],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983758,0.001113126,0.0000554349,0.000045233603,0.00016391129,0.0002464804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981542,0.000808378,0.00068872294,0.000050351904,0.00011329351,0.00018509841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014540255,0.0001382322,0.00017630516,0.001056715,0.0028228248,0.002381349,0.00024312365,0.0008426098,0.0025512557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026313036,0.0001150801,0.00010217233,0.0013458829,0.0078016687,0.0018259637,0.0027518077,0.00082195044,0.00010681349],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008122351,0.00012263356,0.06745056,0.0017693628,0.000028303772,0.0060756025,0.6459698,0.00033070976,0.0012176331,0.1874706,0.0053784726,0.08410503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000094897005,0.00008496739,0.07939842,0.003728944,0.000015431357,0.0030147023,0.80288404,0.00010068835,0.00024494974,0.008199356,0.10229413,0.000024815034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008696726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01375495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008696726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019227627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029346824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017292202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252183880","doi":"10.1002/div.2104","title":"Jean Coutu Group (PJC) Inc. (The)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mergent s Dividend Achievers","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Estate; Real estate; Distribution (mathematics); Citation; Market share; Marketing; Computer science; World Wide Web; Finance; Mathematics","score_opus":0.020925439515239334,"score_gpt":0.3003029225300649,"score_spread":0.27937748301482557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252183880","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002489805,0.0052333935,0.00072338287,0.0074488427,0.0018100973,0.000057798454,0.0007176025,0.00065291463,0.9808662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008096256,0.0015789496,0.00037031271,0.0007979947,0.00026329805,0.000016189602,0.00026362902,0.000074095224,0.98853916],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946445,0.000041500803,0.000017598912,0.00013034849,0.0002512401,0.00009481725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840873,0.0001525193,0.00012271994,0.00007258321,0.0005455408,0.00069786323],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034817215,0.00059248885,0.0002512287,0.0015803777,0.0018685404,0.0026990806,0.00040798925,0.0016385395,0.6088792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001557766,0.00022563846,0.00015258125,0.0012180199,0.00046939577,0.001216862,0.0011211551,0.0010926083,0.24630041],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051644336,0.00006150418,0.0017645628,0.0001445101,0.0000042009115,0.00026143302,0.00017235723,0.00006580877,0.0006057571,0.010196356,0.70340943,0.28326237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064015867,0.000016721617,0.0010529218,0.00004350709,0.0000021975234,0.0002142309,0.00009252947,0.00005205895,0.00011251041,0.0003239773,0.99807894,0.0000038440535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0135277575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03339026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6088792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000940735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020498098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55788636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253030667","doi":"10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-3065-0104","title":"briefing-papers-canadian-policy-in-namibia-a-lack-of-clout-or-a-lack-of-commitmant-sept-1985-6-pp","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Human Rights Documents online","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Operations research; Geography; Engineering","score_opus":0.07046414943660437,"score_gpt":0.41109356950784176,"score_spread":0.3406294200712374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253030667","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014975049,0.00012350804,0.0000129240125,0.00022620965,0.000056161785,0.000009893283,0.9977124,0.00011850577,0.0015906082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009899702,0.00025200605,0.00012075272,0.00010479408,0.00002778409,0.0000755577,0.9924508,0.000087238834,0.005891029],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908996,0.00008376512,0.00008490816,0.00013554656,0.00031265282,0.0002932271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955948,0.00093463616,0.00045692213,0.0006872892,0.0015245656,0.0008017455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012068741,0.0018445431,0.0012220907,0.0055901716,0.0020861062,0.0049437336,0.0021389644,0.0020366837,0.13236748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008942939,0.00081695133,0.0013877348,0.014588053,0.00065717654,0.0015608171,0.0018020262,0.001995512,0.09230177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002223196,0.000007949822,0.0007854971,0.00022020539,0.000010033131,0.000010281998,0.000016866292,0.000085821805,0.000014356509,0.00033593902,0.9972934,0.0011973912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015966881,0.000004854917,0.0068451595,0.00030858407,0.0000149087855,0.00001703977,0.00013003509,0.00015185107,0.00012850491,0.000361558,0.9918612,0.000016578284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6299516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7586697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3700484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007832224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018983888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74445534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253361622","doi":"10.4324/9781843145790-55","title":"Community Savings Credit Union v United Assn Of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada 2001 B.C.S.C. 413","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Apprenticeship; Political science; Economic history; Economics; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.034179753395241076,"score_gpt":0.2619687173672524,"score_spread":0.22778896397201134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253361622","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023308662,0.005589704,0.00024440038,0.011658551,0.00048700563,0.000047463884,0.0001894016,0.00004463618,0.9794079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015806459,0.0017504686,0.00012262605,0.0062640314,0.0000769148,0.0000453977,0.00009014378,0.000023326293,0.97582066],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992312,0.00010830508,0.000017848954,0.000064680185,0.00031842742,0.00025954415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994869,0.00015613256,0.000029554154,0.000027144766,0.00022572465,0.0000746105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007677016,0.0005356822,0.00022696784,0.00085389434,0.010418003,0.0034124774,0.0009077075,0.0053568087,0.044347674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002157186,0.0006370774,0.00033529164,0.0010745263,0.0017141094,0.0018530621,0.001352369,0.005355759,0.0118107665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011195295,0.000027268896,0.00044148788,0.000038877897,0.0000018360809,0.00016444543,0.001640045,0.00006613643,0.00008947849,0.10267343,0.87554574,0.019300079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049958344,0.000009192724,0.0010144449,0.00012481393,0.000002904719,0.00011200601,0.001032822,0.00005983124,0.00015826125,0.0035747401,0.9938983,0.000007760631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22592315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4970813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22592315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051705656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014946033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44921625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255546245","doi":"10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-9986-0007","title":"guatemalan-community-leaders-ask-canadian-government-to-investigate-human-rights-violations-committed-by-goldcorp-inc-at-marlin-mine-dec-9-2009-1pp","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Human Rights Documents online","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Ask price; Political science; Fishery; Human rights; Public administration; Geography; Business; Law; Biology; Finance","score_opus":0.03675572701866012,"score_gpt":0.34732086100792814,"score_spread":0.310565133989268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255546245","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017027762,0.00004038335,0.000016843538,0.00011233164,0.000025313757,0.000010729677,0.99878985,0.0002627503,0.00057150016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00051599066,0.00006663372,0.0001386322,0.00008106999,0.000007731833,0.0000707066,0.99790883,0.000064003216,0.0011464858],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999305,0.000112045724,0.00006534136,0.0001572706,0.00015373471,0.00020644774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977374,0.0004215865,0.00023414392,0.0004889789,0.0006011831,0.0005166262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009848868,0.002727145,0.0012280161,0.0039703595,0.0013410943,0.0028987497,0.0032785875,0.0031874413,0.07315884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005276521,0.0009301167,0.0015479567,0.0062331813,0.0007826027,0.0015399064,0.0028280308,0.0017914326,0.09033015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042955027,0.000014661799,0.00096660113,0.00030006454,0.000013687482,0.000012765999,0.000027068954,0.00012260905,0.00003590064,0.00017736541,0.99725074,0.0010355341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053362176,0.00002336361,0.010267452,0.00057912356,0.000045645676,0.00006139545,0.0003190588,0.00097087934,0.00053060666,0.00094820675,0.9856629,0.000057829126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17133598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3416039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.828664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030441931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005147436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34067744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281679871","doi":"10.21991/cf29444","title":"Doctrine Calling: Inherent Indigenous Jurisdiction in Vuntut Gwitchin","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Indigenous; Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Chemistry; Philosophy; Sociology; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.02070468328231063,"score_gpt":0.2974262186870117,"score_spread":0.27672153540470107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281679871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15725945,0.0033309597,0.004878489,0.038626418,0.00084786955,0.0001602373,0.00006358821,0.000066431305,0.7947664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83405423,0.00053500367,0.0016739551,0.009318066,0.00012952079,0.00012309017,0.000020564781,0.00007248516,0.154073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997074,0.0008856093,0.00012950483,0.00049146684,0.00041736665,0.0010020388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983588,0.0010187365,0.00011409596,0.000106295905,0.00018894165,0.00021298864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039721904,0.00021201915,0.00044863753,0.0005868045,0.029571729,0.007559552,0.0011701977,0.0047570486,0.009294777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057534366,0.00044606166,0.00017058318,0.0009599403,0.012102518,0.0037039432,0.0060475105,0.009059347,0.0006373361],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000127319245,0.00001093588,0.0003055816,0.00003272791,0.0000018740424,0.00037020966,0.04470978,0.0000457662,0.0004387264,0.9430913,0.0063655344,0.004614924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031638974,0.00004236327,0.0040848246,0.00048099397,0.000033363474,0.0009324712,0.071742885,0.00056865247,0.0024731238,0.18975233,0.7297825,0.00007477487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051797107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12926134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9482029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066887597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011947441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10299122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281715103","doi":"10.21991/cf29443","title":"Dickson v Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation, Section 25 and a Plurinational Charter","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Charter; Political science; History; Law; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.022677648802949302,"score_gpt":0.2633903208127694,"score_spread":0.2407126720098201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281715103","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029939868,0.006560067,0.0015475913,0.07248856,0.003378911,0.00047763338,0.00089069665,0.00016592586,0.88455075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1970993,0.0023354588,0.0016339105,0.1892503,0.0008089478,0.0009231832,0.00029216867,0.000136474,0.60752034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964066,0.0006399503,0.0002263406,0.0005480034,0.0007577951,0.0014212372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973023,0.001680944,0.00018305567,0.00013973236,0.00042571503,0.00026812486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043923445,0.0006618463,0.0005627051,0.0010636081,0.011932358,0.007987712,0.0020029577,0.022221986,0.015591028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012295787,0.00095962564,0.0005333801,0.0010967301,0.0029688443,0.0032732857,0.0027087913,0.012282586,0.0024858722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006769169,0.000053734904,0.0007198693,0.00012361543,0.000011681701,0.0005436904,0.0033494788,0.00010975287,0.000724436,0.7754375,0.2129291,0.005929463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001102832,0.000056918332,0.0040109176,0.000589307,0.000044212145,0.00024684216,0.0025402233,0.00021644213,0.0010813858,0.044969793,0.94604206,0.00009155563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17731912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32392403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17731912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057377527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021472916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.352574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285406453","doi":"10.56516/revdirfem.v1i1.7","title":"A perspectiva de gênero no Direito brasileiro","year":2022,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Direito e Feminismos","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"WSP (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.031041783299199863,"score_gpt":0.3281479352883388,"score_spread":0.2971061519891389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285406453","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23703413,0.006715543,0.003169809,0.051441316,0.0005998945,0.00010917193,0.0005001858,0.00004023633,0.7003897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9404758,0.0045919875,0.0012367525,0.0049961912,0.00013195172,0.000049235,0.00013715666,0.00002615779,0.048354648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962024,0.0014030501,0.00010211724,0.0004099445,0.0008983374,0.0009840943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972697,0.0007476729,0.00031751124,0.0003119933,0.0006658403,0.00068718207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00305016,0.00027400002,0.0003280187,0.0016472419,0.010406708,0.0062292716,0.0007887329,0.0017615452,0.015974585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046148743,0.0002800785,0.0003043445,0.0020609058,0.008298753,0.0023411869,0.004631907,0.0023608094,0.0006337397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053748798,0.000042855463,0.030292116,0.00029449398,0.000025235751,0.0016423888,0.12498747,0.00023205568,0.0014295684,0.72613055,0.024058683,0.09081081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017005459,0.00006868223,0.057497248,0.0014523073,0.000034799756,0.0014909833,0.12193401,0.00028514865,0.0004743894,0.03931236,0.77735794,0.00007506776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30358577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5234657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30358577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007981192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011419383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6036374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285718216","doi":"10.7202/1088752ar","title":"Un verrou sur la justiciabilité des droits sociaux","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Sociologie et sociétés","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3973988204679872,"score_gpt":0.5120563651370097,"score_spread":0.1146575446690225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285718216","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3393578,0.010292618,0.0063282843,0.06787698,0.00056340965,0.00005215159,0.00024770846,0.00006192587,0.5752191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9568322,0.0030986385,0.0008068387,0.0018425322,0.00009166675,0.000028690263,0.00005465399,0.000030146555,0.037214614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968125,0.0011890905,0.000054741377,0.0003190472,0.00091792,0.0007066365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959835,0.001265816,0.000428684,0.00038877747,0.0012365653,0.0006966581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002525195,0.00041537796,0.00041900374,0.0019402382,0.012605598,0.008482222,0.0009941505,0.0015697426,0.00972336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004884928,0.00018569666,0.00026228433,0.0020721506,0.023399316,0.0042498666,0.0035383636,0.0038478829,0.0004967388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031796706,0.000019294399,0.010586731,0.00014840392,0.000033162407,0.00032404784,0.13078576,0.0003036111,0.0010716729,0.81335104,0.009227286,0.034117218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013691149,0.00007779871,0.08081205,0.0012033662,0.000070360926,0.00038970076,0.24967021,0.0009399888,0.001230499,0.106978625,0.5584762,0.00013756807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5937168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.724188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5937168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019010335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022174682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294982954","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197550021.013.9","title":"Remedies and Accountability for Economic and Social Rights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interim; Remedial education; Accountability; Political science; Dialogic; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.03435361386078709,"score_gpt":0.2605806518804142,"score_spread":0.2262270380196271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294982954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005196633,0.005404202,0.020265102,0.03733878,0.0009789469,0.00015414912,0.000048797334,0.0001000884,0.9305134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66290814,0.0065120566,0.01667551,0.010328061,0.0008066729,0.00040438614,0.000055196833,0.000101957194,0.302208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937279,0.0027059196,0.00024402852,0.0006506577,0.002048353,0.0006231534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99534816,0.0027592184,0.00028408226,0.0007125194,0.0007187978,0.00017722281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077052335,0.00056274096,0.0003752044,0.0014139276,0.004499779,0.0074036727,0.0013040004,0.005272491,0.012566794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011475855,0.00029480673,0.00042923834,0.0009079215,0.0279543,0.0069941413,0.004856392,0.008187708,0.0011615581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011589557,0.000004836195,0.000026159412,0.000017979408,6.8763234e-7,0.000024026158,0.000600236,0.00014585789,0.000058589972,0.9920746,0.002810998,0.004234918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011820618,0.000021622796,0.00030517916,0.00044286923,0.0000066692355,0.00008413295,0.0011469957,0.0007523975,0.00063220516,0.6779837,0.31859127,0.000021150932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006435352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008796973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012566794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007810362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0122104725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05666846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297235682","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v25i2.14860","title":"DNA EVIDENCE IN SOUTH AFRICA: FALLACIES AND THE FUTURE","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Profiling (computer programming); Legislature; Political science; Law; DNA profiling; Common law; Biology; DNA; Genetics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03152925795317972,"score_gpt":0.2845128952228036,"score_spread":0.25298363726962386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297235682","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0123018185,0.14034817,0.0013173982,0.81707674,0.0013994365,0.00003648391,0.00005362818,0.000012336753,0.027453963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45238474,0.29670194,0.0065202033,0.22721615,0.0042726826,0.00016355819,0.00011236044,0.000055913646,0.012572582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99100304,0.0043949406,0.0009197812,0.00074844604,0.0016711584,0.001262562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9518229,0.034504358,0.004269815,0.0012591968,0.0050980235,0.0030457207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021561095,0.00046302445,0.00080800813,0.00581633,0.008815116,0.012743904,0.0016842048,0.014579222,0.008336054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045183517,0.0005687027,0.00059499376,0.0044448525,0.029456973,0.018203178,0.008259817,0.012684641,0.00072587543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043804826,0.00006521711,0.003503374,0.0019080512,0.00003561616,0.0026825895,0.019640323,0.00027091664,0.0009589097,0.80732024,0.02144582,0.14212517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024348336,0.00008204252,0.0067407186,0.012729554,0.000055961264,0.0025561068,0.029700126,0.00032573333,0.0008473939,0.408104,0.53871864,0.000115313174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027116405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029398702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027116405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0147782955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028726324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11402738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297805254","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-10695-8","title":"Informal Livelihoods and Governance in South Africa","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg; National Research Foundation; Economic and Social Research Council; University of Edinburgh; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Livelihood; Corporate governance; Everyday life; Economic growth; Political science; Development economics; Geography; Business; Economics; Law; Archaeology; Finance","score_opus":0.018093480536637573,"score_gpt":0.26457227557492874,"score_spread":0.24647879503829118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297805254","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07346699,0.08808425,0.0012941328,0.028187826,0.0006479534,0.0001127357,0.00013149895,0.000053301712,0.8080213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6010813,0.07222254,0.0009932023,0.0016802517,0.00023297081,0.00020853466,0.00011372085,0.000053480442,0.32341397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998258,0.00006201147,0.000006471913,0.000012412848,0.000034781035,0.000058563477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99982774,0.00007284563,0.000026356258,0.0000131725055,0.000013508193,0.00004639867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028926757,0.00034331833,0.00016775235,0.00046813456,0.0029342833,0.004073717,0.00020731243,0.00051141414,0.009635208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068183424,0.0001882056,0.00010003099,0.001670254,0.0033981944,0.0018865213,0.0020459946,0.0010270791,0.0005438197],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025655801,0.000035378136,0.002213612,0.00042548962,0.000007006679,0.0010333498,0.082908474,0.0007238954,0.00079530966,0.7599071,0.064039625,0.08788502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000111218405,0.00002112687,0.008399339,0.00067624333,0.000005059132,0.00033487473,0.032196313,0.00022753961,0.00011663779,0.064287916,0.8937151,0.000008659964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028055765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06753609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028055765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032946935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003733511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05578488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297990014","doi":"10.18357/ijcyfs132-3202221032","title":"THE ROLE OF CITIES IN ENDING VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN IN SOUTH AFRICA","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Child Youth and Family Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Foundation","keywords":"Urbanization; Sustainable development; Normative; Political science; Economic growth; Government (linguistics); Population; Human rights; Sexual abuse; Development economics; Poison control; Law; Suicide prevention; Environmental health; Medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.020175827029282827,"score_gpt":0.2857010932271,"score_spread":0.2655252661978172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297990014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66506815,0.021535104,0.0010165483,0.10735717,0.00030141266,0.00014615689,0.000060091166,0.000017500155,0.20449787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98529184,0.0068722945,0.0004351581,0.003217145,0.00003515877,0.000061487684,0.0000080158925,0.000007994943,0.004071071],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964212,0.001976029,0.00011407323,0.00011605452,0.00021968634,0.0011530687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975574,0.001170389,0.00053438003,0.00008305021,0.00012337162,0.00053135026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036099106,0.00024705895,0.00028508354,0.0010232672,0.015305046,0.0068863533,0.0010080237,0.0024916301,0.0047626165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004783376,0.0004445611,0.00028234778,0.0012898307,0.013958146,0.0056632287,0.011602068,0.004101485,0.00020647189],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043727687,0.000080265694,0.024651125,0.00075954973,0.000023489038,0.003697289,0.50051975,0.000308378,0.0005319109,0.4271463,0.007749347,0.03448894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018238186,0.00008763342,0.032560818,0.0026928883,0.00004000223,0.0016680119,0.71437895,0.00016290453,0.00064860866,0.030739998,0.21695499,0.0000469327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034106385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08151324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034106385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074541033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014445945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06781572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298019662","doi":"","title":"Putting third first: critical legal issues and HIV/AIDS.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"湖北中医学院学报","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Poverty; Human rights; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Political science; Economic growth; Law; Medicine; Virology; Economics","score_opus":0.015255948894048289,"score_gpt":0.3271282439929399,"score_spread":0.3118722950988916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298019662","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023816836,0.28943664,0.00026106226,0.62888545,0.009826226,0.000042843167,0.000034874192,0.000022164171,0.069109015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18599601,0.27006096,0.0010913843,0.39438564,0.022144863,0.00026915836,0.0000908936,0.00009767347,0.12586334],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969409,0.0014750046,0.00012136985,0.00015921379,0.0006104405,0.00069309486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99215937,0.005137887,0.00048884173,0.00016068602,0.00066082756,0.0013924073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045596296,0.000770353,0.0005193524,0.0020901314,0.018235516,0.01194363,0.0010857437,0.016186401,0.0078375805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012817291,0.00054856786,0.00042431956,0.0021256781,0.02670632,0.01214003,0.005926129,0.015372578,0.00080759206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019495938,0.0000438929,0.00061686203,0.00037778384,0.000008348936,0.0008773608,0.058050405,0.000047246027,0.00012693468,0.2811461,0.6078638,0.050821714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001821839,0.000026530717,0.0022329942,0.0019908107,0.0000063734105,0.00089576666,0.044207476,0.000056126763,0.00009161695,0.09450054,0.855947,0.000026492235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04592387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12785718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04592387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010202426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017940106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09131312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306318151","doi":"10.1163/17087384-bja10073","title":"Casting a Constitutional Light on the Cultural Defence in South African Criminal Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Political science; Criminal law; Indigenous; Public law; Civil law (Civil law)","score_opus":0.07884638516160358,"score_gpt":0.34129568917961983,"score_spread":0.26244930401801625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306318151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3131922,0.0049849325,0.007829994,0.114522286,0.0005798862,0.00009945397,0.000046154248,0.000021778635,0.55872333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993768,0.00054240105,0.0007343167,0.0023050727,0.00007439258,0.000023091176,0.0000029372063,0.0000047563753,0.002545123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952414,0.0026750087,0.00019511631,0.00028560363,0.00073987804,0.00086300855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98820007,0.008867811,0.0008947361,0.00070896395,0.000796071,0.0005323585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008973399,0.00026529076,0.0002951394,0.0017666741,0.01040717,0.008645526,0.0008657294,0.0040618964,0.0036377006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014978375,0.0003974341,0.00026579507,0.0015493105,0.05485617,0.0052396716,0.0065257754,0.006052634,0.00013333454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025640359,0.0000042276224,0.00022661594,0.00001400332,0.0000013132495,0.00012857617,0.0061248047,0.000052596482,0.00015264766,0.99183965,0.00029906744,0.0011539956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047181387,0.000061760606,0.0065497756,0.0014217551,0.00005333738,0.0006259738,0.04345327,0.000851261,0.0018698198,0.79230237,0.15268604,0.00007742749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015831454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024618067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015831454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007662314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011394358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055594206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312224242","doi":"","title":"Laverne A. Jacobs &amp; Justice Anne L. Mactavish, eds., Dialogue Between Court And Tribunals – Essays In Administrative Law And Justice (2001- 2007)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Political science","score_opus":0.27898383656870224,"score_gpt":0.5710314281679922,"score_spread":0.29204759159929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312224242","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046702955,0.84119827,0.0011066619,0.06979378,0.0081999265,0.00002659348,0.00015764314,0.00006697706,0.07898317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011334206,0.85118103,0.0019043841,0.009344436,0.005271225,0.00005098868,0.00017462598,0.000090852685,0.120648205],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988336,0.00032506342,0.0000651905,0.0001180604,0.000558919,0.00009920193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820435,0.0009875556,0.00013644679,0.000047795027,0.0003998696,0.00022398119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020890525,0.0013940465,0.0006011053,0.0027662604,0.0034741096,0.006185103,0.0015475014,0.0033066848,0.0187495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031964595,0.00077340775,0.00044604996,0.0033710792,0.0020638874,0.007040639,0.0014476983,0.0027504954,0.009349259],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010209697,0.000024530194,0.00019629035,0.00030587454,0.000005699899,0.000068180125,0.0012686014,0.00010551529,0.00005530338,0.01733751,0.90065706,0.0799653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032319908,0.000003934066,0.00083234883,0.0006701224,0.0000055255396,0.00010440873,0.0011415888,0.00010153418,0.00006323821,0.0067645446,0.9903009,0.000008556198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042999465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11644521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042999465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008296779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08549839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312845928","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4297377","title":"Reconsidering the Test for Interlocutory Injunctions Affecting Homeless Encampments: A Critical Assessment of BC Case Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Interlocutory; Law; Test (biology); Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Geology","score_opus":0.048467092402171,"score_gpt":0.35817870566669086,"score_spread":0.30971161326451985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312845928","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10538492,0.0055643283,0.011586585,0.63175374,0.0030162241,0.00061661255,0.00030956345,0.000080115,0.24168794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8491006,0.0023714958,0.010536483,0.112316564,0.0016210884,0.0005068085,0.00008046239,0.00010438468,0.023362163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.972712,0.008812064,0.0015789161,0.0030879157,0.007956976,0.005852247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82764447,0.14335412,0.0037637295,0.0038973757,0.018131137,0.003209179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046237554,0.0009285631,0.0017250914,0.0056265686,0.01635347,0.016986256,0.011019161,0.04851601,0.008446933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1812186,0.0012071341,0.0013347442,0.003243778,0.046684287,0.02147458,0.007244898,0.042261954,0.0009789626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089132795,0.00008052124,0.0016930669,0.00022414289,0.000027862343,0.0012894855,0.011150243,0.0005012451,0.00073354313,0.93863857,0.029337,0.016235193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035727708,0.00022662879,0.0059788027,0.0043095,0.0003039528,0.0017191875,0.035259213,0.007441758,0.0042809886,0.70707595,0.23261973,0.000426991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1852842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23458338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8147158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025843611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056496873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36841142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313680416","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4318312","title":"Litigation Under Section 7 of the Charter After R v Brown","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Charter; Political science; Law; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.010948033319190701,"score_gpt":0.27623483037014424,"score_spread":0.26528679705095354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313680416","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02152382,0.0033270952,0.004402723,0.3363226,0.017331235,0.0006903154,0.001204276,0.00042971814,0.61476827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15376966,0.001565727,0.002618798,0.4819428,0.006330458,0.0006347715,0.00027628583,0.00028949897,0.352572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9765668,0.0035951175,0.0016501675,0.0025469605,0.0075189127,0.008122006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97542906,0.016983876,0.0014367736,0.0013131094,0.0033613967,0.0014757944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016018854,0.0010187038,0.0018792616,0.002308771,0.013162947,0.012181698,0.004391815,0.06334512,0.021040602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06690451,0.00165688,0.0023449934,0.002136144,0.0063603725,0.0049927696,0.004459385,0.035982702,0.0074779545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010939808,0.00007255202,0.0010810485,0.00013281374,0.00006607702,0.0019970292,0.0023561676,0.0002567076,0.00093209394,0.5248778,0.46100125,0.007117016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023294154,0.0001850064,0.005196789,0.0013487816,0.00027458457,0.0010974985,0.0028628677,0.0012450183,0.0037582673,0.12635434,0.8571315,0.0003123971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070180155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10372442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070180155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008076847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028826274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1395433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313728292","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4317458","title":"Implicitly Feminist?: The SCC’s decision in R v Jarvis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.007567481177700835,"score_gpt":0.299370103768089,"score_spread":0.29180262259038814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313728292","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013836969,0.0016919887,0.0026851525,0.8146649,0.006753141,0.000120426055,0.00012586814,0.00006473696,0.1600568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2668731,0.00081958075,0.0025851417,0.6242983,0.006241696,0.00038279823,0.000053421256,0.00035147043,0.09839449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9785003,0.0066967616,0.0010723707,0.0041953074,0.003638422,0.005896782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98083144,0.01390537,0.00054323085,0.00095867564,0.0021851663,0.0015761124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02921962,0.0007379938,0.0017741615,0.0015428021,0.022194138,0.016130367,0.006845013,0.07189755,0.010580737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06598554,0.0015090836,0.0016960244,0.0015615186,0.025819551,0.013404157,0.008266464,0.07144289,0.002247612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051277064,0.000021295313,0.00028926748,0.00004036272,0.000026247671,0.00044813473,0.0048100934,0.00014061503,0.00020174701,0.87188065,0.11798396,0.0041062515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013141119,0.00004756421,0.0011279458,0.00060113415,0.00013315665,0.0003852648,0.008708936,0.001265224,0.001671145,0.39811087,0.5875941,0.00022334339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09575247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13885579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9042475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013300006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024149647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19039029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317934103","doi":"10.1017/s0008423922000865","title":"In Your Face: Law, Justice, and Niqab-Wearing Women in Canada Natasha Bakht, Toronto: Irwin Law, 2020, pp. 266","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.01485837862073951,"score_gpt":0.2931429287647197,"score_spread":0.2782845501439802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317934103","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10631117,0.123976976,0.0002505065,0.615516,0.0030232305,0.00007272469,0.0018513404,0.000056460347,0.14894162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71074104,0.071856864,0.0004666746,0.051271778,0.00061158923,0.00008109202,0.00052168366,0.00012538773,0.16432393],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979361,0.00019631146,0.000032356675,0.00010149338,0.0006836259,0.0010500363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997993,0.00021289842,0.00009489045,0.000024533814,0.00067725795,0.0009973933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011868774,0.00040587952,0.0005027149,0.0011989275,0.03540008,0.0075375824,0.0019919295,0.004016717,0.015138113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004407679,0.00047041706,0.0002625105,0.0033429626,0.008968151,0.0031477516,0.0035982584,0.0053067203,0.00095674547],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005604221,0.00006384919,0.014192513,0.00028213754,0.000025392901,0.001143483,0.13909948,0.00011442515,0.0002997017,0.04294716,0.7274666,0.0743092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012086282,0.000019808436,0.065627925,0.0011064818,0.000034751924,0.00040062462,0.40156105,0.00012942615,0.00017966695,0.0037181466,0.52710235,0.00010773517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99700254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.100360125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.100360125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16549286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72816706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319782459","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4349241","title":"Section 3 of the Charter at 40","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Charter; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutionalism; Law; Political science; Constitution; Original meaning; Section (typography); Constitutional law; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Politics; Epistemology; History; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.01244093780514937,"score_gpt":0.28415187599366143,"score_spread":0.27171093818851205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319782459","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029305494,0.0016125963,0.0033547669,0.034644537,0.023840716,0.0026595537,0.010072985,0.0020540073,0.9188303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013085153,0.0009944045,0.002295225,0.06530163,0.007338621,0.0030823338,0.0026757657,0.0008789594,0.90434796],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97928417,0.0026672643,0.0017331493,0.0018598952,0.009079382,0.0053761094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97350985,0.010319056,0.0018086361,0.003593131,0.008749225,0.0020200165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014723944,0.0014786582,0.002493757,0.004385629,0.011339855,0.017014882,0.0056681475,0.046469778,0.17986628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05354933,0.0020941254,0.0026833264,0.0036151065,0.004095864,0.0047782464,0.0050177802,0.022767456,0.18470527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006881321,0.00011189754,0.00032311736,0.00018035536,0.000011735908,0.00024767048,0.00033678673,0.00016511997,0.0005246366,0.066784784,0.92180765,0.009437503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000110550194,0.000093205235,0.00500537,0.0008582191,0.000032306292,0.00022534307,0.00031424715,0.00029539995,0.00085345464,0.020013245,0.97201,0.00018872433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07418555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09399501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17986628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007761895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034382507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6017127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321238841","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/ndu6m","title":"Regulations relevant to (long-form) audio recordings in South Africa","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Nautical Research Society","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Business; Speech recognition","score_opus":0.07216214127457114,"score_gpt":0.34130801558076973,"score_spread":0.2691458743061986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321238841","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21035133,0.008912813,0.07654886,0.04250626,0.002149611,0.008593808,0.010553264,0.001309308,0.6390748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67115057,0.011195366,0.07127236,0.012782481,0.0011868193,0.014554807,0.006396273,0.00085611467,0.2106053],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9776432,0.007891091,0.0031384877,0.0022103828,0.00752546,0.0015913077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9353183,0.042739104,0.0056400746,0.007165375,0.0080145495,0.0011226274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016765788,0.00042486718,0.00040619963,0.002401803,0.0049218494,0.006272666,0.0015077033,0.0032170545,0.022946615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04850696,0.00062054204,0.00032178854,0.0035219488,0.004992158,0.0025581867,0.003546158,0.0026670243,0.0067194775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008538861,0.00030823416,0.016541451,0.0054651652,0.000058649777,0.0073622763,0.23542581,0.0011220182,0.12848154,0.18366423,0.11483,0.30588672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008046061,0.00013735899,0.05705913,0.004176977,0.00005679605,0.0021561452,0.02627654,0.00038314145,0.018716995,0.008775333,0.882057,0.00012418051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015770974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019154664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022946615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035088682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010844949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088667035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323787428","doi":"10.33137/ic.v23i.39891","title":"Straight from the Archives: Senator Peter Bosa’s Personal Archives to be Available Shortly for Consultation and Study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Italian Canadiana","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; History; Law; Political science; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03581684492157016,"score_gpt":0.2883930862210712,"score_spread":0.252576241299501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323787428","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029707043,0.0041400874,0.00078912714,0.76793826,0.032262716,0.0003274207,0.0020771152,0.0006168017,0.18887778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012414728,0.0012138388,0.0005331445,0.12056765,0.0027426989,0.00027168455,0.00037558816,0.00053358375,0.86134714],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966893,0.00093582744,0.00019088738,0.00040462497,0.00086122885,0.0009179961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98681784,0.002757257,0.00047281134,0.00093850767,0.0052737696,0.0037398015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045956476,0.00071505556,0.0008106797,0.0011395741,0.019023424,0.00887872,0.0018511104,0.013062219,0.20544378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024136659,0.0008913836,0.0006170715,0.0011263372,0.003691981,0.008105303,0.0066225384,0.016907904,0.1118641],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010381434,0.000006341059,0.00011601285,0.00002309843,0.0000017692261,0.00015186239,0.000633988,0.0000065362965,0.00008795872,0.0023041118,0.99473923,0.0019188777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003699533,0.0000028918635,0.00037488886,0.000056911544,0.000001972247,0.000059475453,0.002309208,0.000008454291,0.0000837406,0.0007126136,0.99637246,0.0000137179195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08130049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18068503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20544378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049318383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019154113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6872779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365813841","doi":"10.1163/17087384-bja10076","title":"The Conundrum of Two Fellows in The Same Ship: A Comparative Legal Analysis of The Duplicity of Damages in South Africa","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Plaintiff; Law; Common law; Equity (law); Political science; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Delict; Comparative law; Private law; Black letter law; History","score_opus":0.0871911255752702,"score_gpt":0.3845308382580939,"score_spread":0.2973397126828237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365813841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73831385,0.0016041605,0.0054189237,0.009608327,0.000059542483,0.000099811754,0.000029010387,0.000006398667,0.24485995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971787,0.00023477238,0.00028653012,0.00015822533,0.000007722647,0.00001534574,0.0000028731406,0.000002427861,0.0021133444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958585,0.0019315742,0.00012700299,0.00030070508,0.0006503597,0.0011318498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913515,0.005982443,0.0011621466,0.00035226857,0.0007467838,0.00040489022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054278728,0.00019456643,0.0005135975,0.0035126368,0.012456016,0.009731733,0.0017356756,0.0045964485,0.011216117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018148364,0.00037876389,0.0005100048,0.0030346652,0.027903175,0.0090294015,0.008469611,0.003445405,0.0002608628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029414936,0.000024731291,0.0022658797,0.00004755575,0.000010463133,0.0013723716,0.03146793,0.00030818197,0.0002877993,0.9601893,0.0003096302,0.003686713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062468265,0.00024044319,0.03198243,0.0013591656,0.00020296374,0.0028422968,0.4154919,0.0047219163,0.0014521746,0.4503251,0.09120633,0.00011284444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02260178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03771173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02260178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011827563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005332554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08581537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372234371","doi":"10.55016/zgcw1834","title":"A Common Hunger: Land Rights in Canada and South Africa","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Goddard Space Flight Center; University of Toronto; Canada Council for the Arts; Alberta Foundation for the Arts; Government of Canada; Canadian Bar Association; University of the Western Cape; University of Ottawa; University of Oxford; National Geographic Society","keywords":"Indigenous; Dignity; Poverty; Context (archaeology); Political science; Geography; Human rights; Development economics; Land tenure; Economic growth; Economic Justice; Indigenous rights; Law; Ecology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01326468657479048,"score_gpt":0.19636858333354174,"score_spread":0.18310389675875124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4372234371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09929991,0.054861005,0.00045439554,0.049310107,0.0007174051,0.00007396893,0.00011062998,0.000029807787,0.7951429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7223839,0.026736949,0.00072092714,0.006047978,0.00014220193,0.000048949605,0.00008257887,0.000047677077,0.2437888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890876,0.00010754976,0.000020565967,0.00006827795,0.00034525094,0.00054966175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990429,0.00026060306,0.000044552136,0.00003889688,0.00028146486,0.00033159542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006423818,0.00035145384,0.0003328171,0.0019665202,0.026776476,0.008996497,0.0010715516,0.002280479,0.0064116633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017902394,0.00023219947,0.00020778323,0.0039088908,0.018188227,0.0032250797,0.0035338893,0.003306072,0.00030254677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023671984,0.000036283836,0.0017216079,0.00016285344,0.00000828869,0.0018116686,0.15916966,0.0002512413,0.0003771773,0.7252013,0.055453584,0.055782653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010790863,0.0000106828165,0.0069483235,0.00049085804,0.000011374034,0.0004735912,0.095166445,0.00015882014,0.00020245308,0.0246382,0.8718502,0.000038240225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9779025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99238694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07299921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07299921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09201471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5296488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4375831770","doi":"10.47348/tsar/2023/i2a5","title":"A cause of action raising a triable issue in a class action: reconsidering the certification threshold","year":2023,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Tydskrif vir die suid-afrikaanse reg","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.32645404877734413,"score_gpt":0.3997789358053836,"score_spread":0.07332488702803946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4375831770","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035912223,0.0019438277,0.008406836,0.77964145,0.0069912933,0.0002564205,0.00006801592,0.00017094472,0.16660906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73711294,0.00090130576,0.004851659,0.19381972,0.0024342313,0.00048450072,0.00007459218,0.00026717022,0.060053892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9422915,0.023587009,0.0033363558,0.0073825573,0.010144348,0.013258235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89602333,0.06422781,0.0055079334,0.004848202,0.009662918,0.019729719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06433509,0.00061818585,0.00095882744,0.0025703593,0.026421875,0.025709055,0.00527731,0.03693679,0.03157256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13384601,0.0009463257,0.001542816,0.0009935535,0.02926611,0.025697185,0.020507095,0.040114652,0.0035391168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008576214,0.00031993046,0.010453574,0.000230659,0.000027801978,0.0019629616,0.061139137,0.00030333438,0.00041075947,0.6692388,0.2040952,0.051732097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002150661,0.00023075734,0.015218552,0.0023070048,0.00010514649,0.0008177322,0.11108692,0.0019132847,0.0011603528,0.31531575,0.55131805,0.0003112982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04375649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08198724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06433509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021703923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059202928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34024054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380630800","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.207","title":"The Impact of the Private Security Industry Regulation Act and other Legislative Frameworks on Private Securities Operating in Drinking Establishments in South Africa","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Legislature; Business; Private security; Private sector; CLARITY; Duty; Finance; Public administration; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.044022791377502354,"score_gpt":0.35417308816280346,"score_spread":0.3101502967853011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380630800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9523445,0.0011603389,0.00066365855,0.007036342,0.000063185245,0.00011304645,0.0001525876,0.000010367509,0.038455922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943902,0.000740271,0.00019865857,0.0006946285,0.000013969041,0.000040324314,0.000043898795,0.0000061731976,0.0038718504],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99326855,0.0020443255,0.00031789677,0.00049018866,0.0017965769,0.0020824275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9769982,0.010254174,0.008439931,0.0005643422,0.0019296537,0.0018137776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058844513,0.00019336927,0.00019130322,0.0015572795,0.0032149267,0.0046697836,0.00081537216,0.00089795043,0.0063796034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019851936,0.00039132073,0.0002946665,0.0017351543,0.0048543,0.0024626555,0.0035508976,0.0023012706,0.00030729978],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040828937,0.00035995967,0.42985424,0.001903345,0.00012366424,0.0062821805,0.19424044,0.0022189512,0.013865522,0.25001737,0.011202827,0.08952329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002592087,0.0001951261,0.74175614,0.001310517,0.00006975014,0.0005606966,0.15242505,0.0007273068,0.0021746715,0.004316834,0.09635655,0.000081306374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08923987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13147706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08923987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009517711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014609368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17744088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384451809","doi":"10.47348/sacj/v36/i1a5","title":"The adequacy of rape criminalisation in modern South Africa: A comparative study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; CLARITY; Law; Criminology; Political science; Criminal law; Sexual assault; Sentence; Sociology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics","score_opus":0.12725805060837075,"score_gpt":0.3789522234718644,"score_spread":0.25169417286349366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384451809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9727377,0.0043020863,0.00010151282,0.0012665963,0.000023029308,0.000053154607,0.000055487424,0.0000015766395,0.021458697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944318,0.0043090708,0.00010060068,0.00012715044,0.000016450274,0.00001956778,0.000024008028,0.0000035661208,0.00096780463],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986694,0.00059367163,0.000097684766,0.00008805126,0.0001962677,0.00035486367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971077,0.0014688035,0.00080477115,0.00012737373,0.00028166137,0.000209767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019922869,0.00025706674,0.00039742215,0.0039639696,0.0050391415,0.002906699,0.00054508646,0.00077600265,0.0051457835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009089611,0.00034205354,0.00023822236,0.004802714,0.0072362674,0.002836681,0.0032783537,0.0016076893,0.00024061007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029827058,0.00027408748,0.11205395,0.0018008178,0.00012531885,0.009715045,0.7246304,0.000362111,0.0015262637,0.07805117,0.0017781825,0.06938433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023457571,0.00025320143,0.31898388,0.0015811219,0.00007667244,0.005425454,0.6279465,0.00019675259,0.00036834902,0.004026439,0.04106922,0.000048980593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044078294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.098296165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044078294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068599633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002909878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087643445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385241220","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v25i1.16525","title":"SENTENCING OF PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLERS IN CANADA. LESSONS FOR SOUTH AFRICA?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Seriousness; Punishment (psychology); Prison; Criminology; Legislation; Sentence; Attendance; Political science; Service (business); Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Business","score_opus":0.08449379811015129,"score_gpt":0.33569306580244274,"score_spread":0.25119926769229145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385241220","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42524856,0.021785904,0.0004166557,0.49370947,0.0022747729,0.00054283,0.0011272752,0.00004843024,0.054846022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8628919,0.036197692,0.0018924997,0.058824386,0.00040625074,0.00034999583,0.00062501174,0.000057763275,0.03875446],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978327,0.0002659679,0.000083303355,0.00011515296,0.00031181122,0.0013911208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937996,0.000418811,0.00033591918,0.00007677707,0.002001164,0.003367692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016464791,0.0005922334,0.0004665353,0.0016595996,0.018112548,0.0031775604,0.0023630115,0.0035451336,0.008003089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007612398,0.0005152242,0.0005708043,0.00263441,0.0026119046,0.001974009,0.0036193717,0.0046537956,0.00061983394],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009173685,0.0013107979,0.18011793,0.0029670573,0.00017078451,0.019938705,0.13135365,0.0010519186,0.002381608,0.05768802,0.23636638,0.36573583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032268165,0.00039359307,0.3975889,0.005355735,0.0002630842,0.003344804,0.37834275,0.0011396273,0.00076192466,0.008715268,0.20335934,0.0004123231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9916984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057573352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057573352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23675808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41772586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385309200","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v44i2.16558","title":"THE CONFLICT BETWEEN CERTAIN CAPITAL ALLOWANCES IN THE INCOME TAX ACT AND THE SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONES POLICY OBJECTIVES","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Business; Capital (architecture); Public economics; Property tax; Allowance (engineering); Context (archaeology); Income tax; Incentive; Tax policy; Economic policy; Economics; Tax reform; Market economy; Law; Operations management; Political science","score_opus":0.01805645931809351,"score_gpt":0.3217493208971571,"score_spread":0.30369286157906356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385309200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38062388,0.0030565925,0.02781473,0.076637335,0.0007271601,0.0004447708,0.0004146372,0.00013874892,0.5101422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665247,0.00063013413,0.007468082,0.006249148,0.00011575421,0.00022263448,0.00005231002,0.00002156147,0.01871556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908409,0.0033606724,0.0010856969,0.00090427033,0.0025027494,0.0013055819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98909914,0.005822062,0.002078459,0.0011503216,0.0014805665,0.0003693822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008581216,0.00029668064,0.0003595227,0.0007906623,0.0041144635,0.0062655364,0.0012525605,0.005077909,0.0021650686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018190693,0.0004586289,0.00043333872,0.0009919088,0.011378255,0.0032059238,0.0030563083,0.006310234,0.00034412986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016898655,0.000024176792,0.0023269174,0.000057675436,0.0000061377,0.00017187696,0.00510788,0.00025871396,0.0005573306,0.98496705,0.0023377906,0.0041675465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009093509,0.00026631771,0.043371893,0.001450571,0.00009485676,0.0016220012,0.020835241,0.0030881097,0.0056476677,0.25587356,0.6673958,0.00026309304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02447645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043793533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02447645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006375131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013126324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048667967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518158","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1148","title":"The First Years of the South African Constitutional Court","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional court; Constitution; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Dignity; Democracy; High Court; Charter; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.0383977175940013,"score_gpt":0.2967878873949738,"score_spread":0.2583901698009725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05813331,0.11143623,0.008636037,0.17281123,0.0037068927,0.00022283668,0.00017278672,0.000050131588,0.6448305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87801015,0.0305096,0.0025686424,0.014747351,0.0010478516,0.00021126136,0.000070247566,0.000054573575,0.07278039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892061,0.005039401,0.0005716772,0.00076266384,0.0028992572,0.0015209134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882781,0.008289096,0.00074190187,0.00052990025,0.0015964119,0.00056460756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012621615,0.00041364424,0.00046990276,0.0028876227,0.009637315,0.011642471,0.000792108,0.0046728407,0.0042107427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027054634,0.0008504462,0.00038766215,0.0023756733,0.016312629,0.008705128,0.004422038,0.013113229,0.0004914777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007875788,0.0000060543466,0.00011954186,0.00004201732,0.000002518002,0.00012239936,0.0042760605,0.000088393135,0.000091396076,0.9856118,0.0034310126,0.006200893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019175262,0.00003322361,0.0018222502,0.0008740384,0.000009224288,0.00023092765,0.0040937685,0.00030221877,0.0007832137,0.16958822,0.8221991,0.000044664765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03877778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042584546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03877778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024424458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022430375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17721266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385559301","doi":"10.55662/jadr.2023.2301","title":"MEDIATING INDIGENOUS DISPUTES: LESSONS FROM AFRICA AND CANADA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Alternate Dispute Resolution","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Indigenous; Conciliation; Political science; Legislature; Alternative dispute resolution; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.030116810358855932,"score_gpt":0.3158946660343224,"score_spread":0.2857778556754665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385559301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2302883,0.020265011,0.0023560894,0.09378178,0.00042288104,0.0002585947,0.00020256024,0.000043563927,0.6523812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9416885,0.021483002,0.002842396,0.0051676026,0.000069366906,0.000083826926,0.000064470376,0.000038146507,0.028562678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966002,0.00090258796,0.000078435434,0.00016648561,0.00057866686,0.0016736267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944365,0.0026289634,0.00020295013,0.00016450236,0.0015276857,0.0010393157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035902595,0.00040515393,0.0005732824,0.0014752883,0.029903894,0.0078905625,0.0023638331,0.0026949842,0.005958758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009102675,0.00030110285,0.00039202644,0.002775399,0.011352863,0.0047911,0.0050109974,0.0049338145,0.00026254755],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013898588,0.00019873126,0.012382707,0.00052760716,0.000046910576,0.0069140205,0.3161094,0.0015504218,0.0003690781,0.55002844,0.027719686,0.084014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010689131,0.00005759885,0.015247356,0.0022944116,0.000093126604,0.001348224,0.51548827,0.0019824074,0.00068491977,0.078833506,0.38372102,0.00014226841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9844089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99176764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072591655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.072591655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1313974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5266918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385869228","doi":"10.59962/9780774855181-009","title":"A Comparative History of “Cultural Rights” in South Africa and Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography; Ethnology; Anthropology; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.03853571102527205,"score_gpt":0.219121988359897,"score_spread":0.18058627733462496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385869228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1175744,0.029475646,0.0003889957,0.03361996,0.0003142016,0.00005562875,0.00029585612,0.000024621322,0.8182507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8723629,0.016378455,0.00050694286,0.0028266022,0.000058372054,0.000056443987,0.00008817507,0.00005358217,0.107668504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810386,0.00033142278,0.000035025172,0.00010002247,0.00033686834,0.0010929002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977968,0.0008085325,0.00012159899,0.00007693554,0.0006830088,0.0005131705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011688587,0.00036154545,0.0004581349,0.004180572,0.036130093,0.010046102,0.0013102369,0.0023192456,0.014207698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004746587,0.0004182168,0.00026891194,0.010740557,0.015696067,0.0033282437,0.003559756,0.004645244,0.00037879474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006693003,0.00003442139,0.0024577912,0.00016953019,0.00001718579,0.0007544036,0.14416638,0.00024199348,0.000255091,0.7702697,0.040738925,0.040827703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015897192,0.000011846056,0.018339608,0.0007213847,0.00002948206,0.00022634982,0.14023933,0.00015966834,0.00036393772,0.02573195,0.81410366,0.000056827455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9901744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99660575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13181403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13181403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16586217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9563822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386363116","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4545155","title":"R c Yombo: Affirming and Obscuring the De Minimis Defense","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Physics; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.017053405909346016,"score_gpt":0.3035604748882661,"score_spread":0.2865070689789201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386363116","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054452635,0.009614091,0.0033897466,0.5141447,0.0063068583,0.00015738182,0.0001556376,0.000073559866,0.41170543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69181705,0.0029626915,0.0023608904,0.1567961,0.0020599596,0.00026460583,0.000032418375,0.00014581488,0.14356051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99467826,0.0020849407,0.00019389641,0.00060728175,0.00074623484,0.0016895011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99285674,0.004731541,0.0005995262,0.0005591147,0.00084341876,0.00040965003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072815563,0.00054721686,0.0007279068,0.0008593832,0.011938522,0.0070626647,0.0015699421,0.017673986,0.011063955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02637533,0.0006224461,0.0003727464,0.0007315584,0.01511088,0.005786917,0.0050523607,0.018351667,0.0014081408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056730125,0.00001182959,0.00056559616,0.00009350096,0.0000117821455,0.00041519594,0.0139991855,0.00006977266,0.00046184147,0.9146804,0.06282609,0.0068081412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009803956,0.000052196785,0.0031221544,0.001221712,0.00008673846,0.00049640675,0.018129548,0.0007266537,0.002326098,0.21193811,0.7616952,0.000107147745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05965921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.076061696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05965921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050930944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009703394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11862391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386519887","doi":"10.1515/9781772126716-007","title":"5. Human Rights and Canadian Municipalities","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Alberta Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.03038491694147247,"score_gpt":0.23854957327255888,"score_spread":0.2081646563310864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386519887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003789491,0.0068418933,0.00033046905,0.012004404,0.00046582366,0.000030415631,0.00025004777,0.00003636454,0.97625107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08957823,0.004392865,0.00067645655,0.004923866,0.00011210119,0.00004126923,0.000118169846,0.00006304081,0.9000939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989291,0.00011458501,0.000016699938,0.000076766475,0.0002555602,0.00060732546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993599,0.00012645675,0.000019309024,0.000032392672,0.00029803833,0.00016385692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006921514,0.0005901741,0.0003433136,0.0022121388,0.024465121,0.009347594,0.0013461309,0.004564653,0.051611997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017480671,0.0004797621,0.00045727452,0.0036073923,0.0050591314,0.0026543466,0.0018837155,0.0040806956,0.0028583219],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009322845,0.00001353508,0.0002649945,0.00003737091,0.0000019558206,0.000100237,0.0038766272,0.00015611136,0.00004212216,0.8616104,0.119872555,0.014014649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005564927,0.0000034961156,0.00093850546,0.00010703436,0.0000051399425,0.000031404696,0.0028768964,0.000077096745,0.00005949201,0.022151731,0.97373044,0.00001317249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9860619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07439681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07439681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08979371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5397892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386739929","doi":"10.47348/tsar/2023/i4a9","title":"Regspraak: Onderhoudskostes vir koekoekskuikens – wie moet vir die gelag betaal, of rus die skade maar waar dit val?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tydskrif vir die suid-afrikaanse reg","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wife; Ignorance; Power of attorney; Theology; Philosophy; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Genealogy; Political science; History","score_opus":0.039843535560902976,"score_gpt":0.32977217336739556,"score_spread":0.2899286378064926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386739929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035604853,0.021045862,0.005585986,0.104811914,0.007623784,0.00007743851,0.00055394106,0.00035241008,0.8243438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27010337,0.008235366,0.002971868,0.013548281,0.0012287826,0.000088407316,0.0004727013,0.000765446,0.70258576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838626,0.0007058688,0.000060683054,0.00022209685,0.00034575752,0.00027936095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993436,0.000253116,0.000078423494,0.000064707754,0.0001183612,0.00014181998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013523367,0.0005828172,0.00031556233,0.0006545088,0.005889131,0.007529083,0.00080663076,0.003904838,0.034806367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033583126,0.00037222335,0.00027151447,0.000538637,0.006171571,0.007001113,0.0042466815,0.0043127486,0.013668813],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014446302,0.000088645895,0.0023142316,0.00024822043,0.000017681883,0.0025986885,0.09847197,0.00018890269,0.0018257588,0.50526893,0.31610215,0.072730355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034146824,0.000007069525,0.0006435418,0.00010780382,0.0000028751683,0.00046900692,0.013138367,0.00006870599,0.00027639864,0.007231352,0.9780377,0.000013743871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015998717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028485483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034806367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033170634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001997052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.116438925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387402060","doi":"10.1080/00020184.2023.2261386","title":"The High Court Ruling Against Ingonyama Trust: Implications for South Africa’s Land Governance Policy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Indigenous; Indigenous rights; Land tenure; Law; Land law; Politics; Corporate governance; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.061763956144264255,"score_gpt":0.36561232708731417,"score_spread":0.3038483709430499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387402060","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2654416,0.008297961,0.0055853757,0.4878028,0.0007952543,0.00013036214,0.00010751969,0.000044482,0.23179466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.972,0.0011830466,0.0012397129,0.015011024,0.000121244404,0.000052429856,0.000017003407,0.000013093782,0.0103625115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99451953,0.001975752,0.00028426375,0.00070885924,0.0009266223,0.0015849986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884688,0.00829078,0.00082495384,0.00047015457,0.0010797376,0.0008656121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008513581,0.00027291934,0.0003221578,0.0013070282,0.0105082225,0.011038353,0.0012052906,0.007882361,0.0047972677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02043104,0.0003952638,0.0004084504,0.0013071545,0.021022828,0.0077226693,0.004700944,0.008592482,0.00034877614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001610362,0.00001986284,0.001398714,0.00008732834,0.000006565066,0.000912291,0.013018346,0.0005058372,0.00072614313,0.9736081,0.0033525482,0.006348246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005511471,0.000099850506,0.01436009,0.0016054042,0.000052268522,0.0008084633,0.051009472,0.002387019,0.0032011196,0.58825296,0.3380093,0.00015891495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06814285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07795399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06814285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019256953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023245933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1397196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387986340","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4586986","title":"South West Terminal Ltd. v Achter Land: Contractual and Evidential Implications","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Terminal (telecommunication); Geography; Engineering","score_opus":0.01711396575549169,"score_gpt":0.3209821736075516,"score_spread":0.3038682078520599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387986340","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12640867,0.008519438,0.0031055207,0.40088087,0.0014028053,0.00011199433,0.00044977447,0.00006559891,0.45905533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85070705,0.0035814168,0.0012693926,0.03621616,0.00056132686,0.00006806246,0.000071789415,0.000051132425,0.107473716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99630994,0.0011289222,0.00026026694,0.00043090337,0.00092130894,0.00094870967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97967774,0.016538125,0.001249093,0.00045739862,0.0012937116,0.0007838702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055547007,0.00027034947,0.0002818029,0.00089996244,0.008107642,0.0064953277,0.0015488177,0.0122328205,0.029439034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030326607,0.00046537648,0.00024041766,0.0017332465,0.0057010157,0.0056373277,0.0026069975,0.008091678,0.0013260709],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007833209,0.000025289415,0.0028883128,0.00014702191,0.000010369515,0.0024531046,0.0076141404,0.0002842315,0.0005941268,0.9052259,0.06905263,0.011626588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015909066,0.00010612844,0.018898392,0.0017185119,0.00008520424,0.0030585667,0.02263751,0.002313448,0.0026468271,0.31218687,0.63600457,0.00018478598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06491652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10506333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06491652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006404607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012080736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12907732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388641977","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4601795","title":"Extension of Arbitration Agreements to Non-Parties under Nigerian Law: A Review of Metroline Nigeria Limited v. Alhaji Mukhtar Mohammed Dikko","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Extension (predicate logic); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05346153276809968,"score_gpt":0.3815544882078853,"score_spread":0.3280929554397856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388641977","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016172363,0.99785113,0.00003665623,0.000594212,0.00006763939,0.0000112494645,0.000010236827,7.970703e-7,0.0012662942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0037762746,0.99524057,0.00016508157,0.00047984792,0.000077395496,0.000022940725,0.000015097702,0.000001207455,0.00022154006],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99487525,0.0023677333,0.00072389987,0.00034363655,0.001448458,0.0002410496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.978689,0.016398694,0.002158184,0.0003536481,0.002177779,0.00022274439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013427757,0.0006160373,0.0015408554,0.00465568,0.0009901843,0.0022691307,0.001511417,0.0022351737,0.0030459072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02350675,0.0005938717,0.00094869,0.005753017,0.001601161,0.00257539,0.0014654463,0.0024836268,0.0004816848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021929444,0.00007298116,0.0006856636,0.081588574,0.00033568323,0.00025689026,0.00056192296,0.0003013157,0.00034299676,0.019892767,0.02523702,0.87050486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008888588,0.00019753077,0.0038937628,0.13017148,0.0007857377,0.0007788595,0.00048792196,0.00010097605,0.0003985618,0.004138672,0.8589316,0.000026013198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005914427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016649138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013427757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003068066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010873949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07101357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389726401","doi":"10.4337/9781803921327.00026","title":"Afro-centric law and technology discourse","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cape Town; National Research Foundation; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fondations communautaires du Canada; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025234994072821922,"score_gpt":0.2850567588394379,"score_spread":0.25982176476661595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389726401","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044781107,0.052016534,0.0041982187,0.05050224,0.0007327062,0.000046932048,0.000075574884,0.000043633736,0.84760314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8441185,0.046188425,0.0017109282,0.008675748,0.00060304126,0.00014392099,0.00009179015,0.00008252857,0.09838508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977017,0.0012727296,0.00007403365,0.00018690231,0.0003739039,0.00039079925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997471,0.0019016451,0.00020514725,0.00012573451,0.00017703869,0.00011952858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003964224,0.00051454373,0.00036389523,0.0030932187,0.010056033,0.012639586,0.00069250935,0.0030504037,0.008394775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038880464,0.00024285815,0.0001840027,0.0048597828,0.023283888,0.010808008,0.0041769547,0.0034903218,0.0013208564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058754454,0.000010149516,0.000194867,0.00016121905,0.0000016246954,0.00018298415,0.051494822,0.000053271182,0.00018508532,0.9311204,0.0035563302,0.013033351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000492717,0.000023938786,0.0010710551,0.001928758,0.000007069445,0.00056045543,0.08445114,0.0001642806,0.0003782407,0.1084372,0.80295676,0.000016230219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007857922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076870834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012639586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008818883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057755955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063985765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390017459","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4656632","title":"The Prudent Parliament and Section 24(1)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"TransCanada (Canada); Institute on Governance; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Business; Politics; Advertising","score_opus":0.013413319702996541,"score_gpt":0.29945608356687686,"score_spread":0.28604276386388033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390017459","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03631927,0.0055499123,0.0023666213,0.12683159,0.015096927,0.0012339909,0.0032276295,0.0005646767,0.80880934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.117562175,0.0014213749,0.003183888,0.17925787,0.004806377,0.0014679026,0.0005044361,0.00040922733,0.69138676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98608726,0.0018458909,0.0012609703,0.0016922412,0.0039044227,0.0052092047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98635477,0.006854612,0.0010130764,0.0013995668,0.0030977558,0.0012802872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012311531,0.00075381785,0.0015085456,0.0017760855,0.012529547,0.012674147,0.0033154027,0.038543653,0.03333724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036029648,0.0016548455,0.0013100829,0.0014914385,0.0046920036,0.003310339,0.0041766097,0.020366123,0.013761775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018951544,0.00019738443,0.0022044326,0.00048062613,0.000052332103,0.0012719238,0.0053071273,0.00020767545,0.0031348264,0.49785963,0.4701164,0.01897815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012320923,0.00009543279,0.01260038,0.0008621803,0.000095522664,0.0005497207,0.0011904597,0.00021983846,0.0024936134,0.037309397,0.944307,0.00015318712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05064782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08585326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05064782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063883387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021560859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.111524165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390831749","doi":"10.1080/09649069.2024.2304980","title":"Administrative law values, homelessness and mandatory orders","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.025798740528436035,"score_gpt":0.3336687290508605,"score_spread":0.3078699885224244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390831749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16512309,0.0038404504,0.0036669397,0.22325836,0.00046573844,0.00004084083,0.00024115368,0.00004710552,0.6033163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981684,0.00035824254,0.00027260673,0.008331518,0.00018850621,0.000025738176,0.000022932103,0.000011735649,0.009104731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99136716,0.0038390325,0.00043966583,0.0006096188,0.0017099115,0.0020346087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842927,0.00943185,0.0016805441,0.0014431597,0.0020224752,0.0011293426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068245013,0.00015488412,0.0003004244,0.0008941388,0.008079613,0.008973942,0.0012347944,0.00489204,0.005996105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025264984,0.00031209172,0.00024482008,0.0010802282,0.033283528,0.0048916736,0.004089398,0.007322339,0.000649393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008921492,0.000014425022,0.0009009602,0.00000828041,0.0000016986468,0.0000875201,0.0043240315,0.000034699136,0.000030051,0.9842817,0.00746069,0.0028470105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044364042,0.00003623022,0.00835864,0.00028761761,0.000014177273,0.0003894178,0.01565734,0.0003750876,0.00030348735,0.8344289,0.14006104,0.000043744272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037941452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04916499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037941452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072589484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007834188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07544124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390928461","doi":"10.1080/00083968.2023.2286227","title":"Governing street trading in post-apartheid Cape Town: neo-colonial or neo-liberal order?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Temporalities; Rationality; Colonialism; Political economy; Sociology; Politics; Liberalism; Liberalization; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03959951355023242,"score_gpt":0.28755135658762926,"score_spread":0.24795184303739684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390928461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6246232,0.0055202097,0.0033372375,0.03922041,0.00016623718,0.000085446714,0.000066752546,0.000021155758,0.32695934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99096996,0.0006232953,0.00031835417,0.00030135218,0.000020933174,0.000014217441,0.0000050189424,0.000005128975,0.0077418447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987864,0.00037572952,0.00005799581,0.00017515558,0.00017822176,0.00042651367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982784,0.0008040323,0.00039886215,0.00021004713,0.00013319588,0.00017545675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019554687,0.00015931061,0.00021623149,0.0006758055,0.0061328495,0.005183075,0.00089185766,0.0016026595,0.0028702412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052117333,0.0002693538,0.000114079085,0.0012664553,0.029787643,0.004077625,0.0020789239,0.0023166365,0.00012157192],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013232317,0.000012399189,0.0011932352,0.000044747616,0.0000037909126,0.0011412944,0.07992364,0.00021833334,0.00068194733,0.91086364,0.0008589081,0.0050448156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053192092,0.00006662036,0.043001447,0.0008624477,0.000027471704,0.0014639004,0.11541032,0.0012350042,0.002244173,0.2881665,0.54735607,0.000112767244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.122851975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17475161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.122851975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015068453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008621867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24427378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391108915","doi":"10.1080/00083968.2023.2288157","title":"Diamonds, risk and insurance practices in British Africa, with an emphasis on the Gold Coast and Tanganyika","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Basel","keywords":"Gold coast; Emphasis (telecommunications); Geography; History; Development economics; Archaeology; Economics; Engineering; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.04101963160399418,"score_gpt":0.2798529061356244,"score_spread":0.23883327453163022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391108915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94763565,0.011631787,0.00011951642,0.0029658307,0.000023273222,0.000017165408,0.00006287744,0.0000029303274,0.03754097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917623,0.0045078676,0.00009507885,0.000102581755,0.000003643786,0.0000046751898,0.000010053449,0.0000020797377,0.0035117036],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997826,0.00007022096,0.000011829056,0.00001662133,0.00002486532,0.00009383151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942267,0.00031460507,0.00012406263,0.000010542317,0.000051849453,0.000076312455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034056342,0.00018067993,0.00012642225,0.0013080885,0.0047577526,0.0019227472,0.00026388184,0.00045401312,0.002968796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013125407,0.00015610094,0.000045187393,0.003041147,0.004002152,0.0013083016,0.0010962756,0.0007363601,0.00011639718],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111545276,0.000054606207,0.055862762,0.0005590667,0.000010106953,0.0061816275,0.80565417,0.00015464051,0.00203559,0.07509242,0.002736396,0.05154711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009541504,0.000049790648,0.19176324,0.0009276546,0.000013783168,0.0017708219,0.6727379,0.00012713116,0.00043025558,0.0046163737,0.12752324,0.000030369203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39898527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7251903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39898527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006368321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003682819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79332584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391427397","doi":"10.55667/10.55667/ijede.2023.v38.i2.1309","title":"Tomorrow Never Comes, But It [Education] Gives You Hope","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of e-learning & distance education","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Context (archaeology); Higher education; Perspective (graphical); Qualitative research; Narrative inquiry; Pedagogy; Sociology; Psychology; Medical education; Political science; Gender studies; Medicine; Geography; Social science","score_opus":0.012996786989571674,"score_gpt":0.3568907190929071,"score_spread":0.3438939321033354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391427397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14663717,0.008383147,0.0061932113,0.26880002,0.011425618,0.00013816793,0.0006944516,0.0005380927,0.55719006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72522354,0.0044673923,0.0024040113,0.027768832,0.0010988412,0.00007284792,0.0002855508,0.00028818139,0.23839077],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827766,0.0005294488,0.000060504375,0.00015550706,0.0004158137,0.00056119356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948165,0.00062372,0.00054661545,0.00036462757,0.0009874408,0.0026611432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011666224,0.00036730443,0.00035045246,0.0005444683,0.012852671,0.005921347,0.000660287,0.001691899,0.04448434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007555292,0.00022222029,0.00034726073,0.0005738321,0.00665832,0.005713495,0.006247325,0.003996239,0.0077651055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010686552,0.0001927347,0.021845657,0.00056426175,0.000076973876,0.0023446868,0.13859561,0.00014519578,0.00138279,0.0598273,0.5991178,0.17580017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001049678,0.00006842261,0.008133096,0.0005386779,0.000017631552,0.001245064,0.10134053,0.00007087959,0.00032613068,0.0074172663,0.8807702,0.00006155355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010890025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028710414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04448434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018692467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038389645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14881498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391718414","doi":"10.21991/cf29465","title":"Weaving Section 33 into the Charter Project","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Weaving; Section (typography); Charter; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Law; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.022622506655428528,"score_gpt":0.3215545900362177,"score_spread":0.2989320833807892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391718414","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093171485,0.00186292,0.21000434,0.06363655,0.0035581267,0.0014051495,0.000263947,0.0009873849,0.6251101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8525002,0.0007593223,0.05044906,0.008918332,0.0006641398,0.00068787596,0.00014132945,0.0003109309,0.08556889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98626155,0.0067187785,0.00054409704,0.0016413066,0.0027754148,0.002058857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814291,0.010320787,0.0019664553,0.0029296016,0.0021542136,0.0011998914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023067173,0.00031919812,0.000320749,0.0018147307,0.00576512,0.0072113476,0.0010679257,0.0038348255,0.010129733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032846436,0.00046723182,0.00043637227,0.0012078466,0.008467565,0.0068165646,0.0058396505,0.0063037397,0.0013989939],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019554356,0.000020640284,0.0007960488,0.000034253666,0.0000031208594,0.00019294709,0.00411583,0.00033718205,0.0007155153,0.9665826,0.00626582,0.02091639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042255273,0.00019815388,0.0040051574,0.0004072445,0.000031365893,0.0002947021,0.0045212572,0.0013753714,0.0028968293,0.33826062,0.64783424,0.00013282872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008344261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0110002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023067173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003467033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0212537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12199235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391796847","doi":"10.7202/1100543ar","title":"THE ABROGATION AND RESTORATION OF THE RULE OF LAW AND JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE IN SOUTH AFRICA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Rule of law; Political science; Judicial independence; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.019443176660146583,"score_gpt":0.2854330129203918,"score_spread":0.2659898362602452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391796847","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39172733,0.07371987,0.0014667333,0.2247433,0.0010462002,0.00017366213,0.00011512099,0.0000145378635,0.30699328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9698898,0.009950455,0.00030873748,0.007097116,0.00017059584,0.000059883,0.0000142200015,0.000008364963,0.012500953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948088,0.0016087354,0.0002706541,0.00034950068,0.0006383619,0.0023239441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99666446,0.0016877052,0.0006756272,0.00014759414,0.0003920723,0.00043245565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055362564,0.0002601718,0.0004329944,0.001464009,0.014984103,0.007823895,0.0010706196,0.005402343,0.0031888206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011493307,0.00039767762,0.00039302107,0.0020451623,0.034286503,0.003926091,0.0060274084,0.008024605,0.00015424979],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004157169,0.000025982123,0.0024019592,0.0001172442,0.000014813712,0.0018516667,0.057544205,0.0002096638,0.00053735287,0.91565657,0.008939084,0.012659869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015804081,0.00010599001,0.062980525,0.002571471,0.00011635565,0.0020929913,0.11472593,0.0006101381,0.0022392415,0.28080893,0.5333678,0.00022257952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46691096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59722424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46691096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024696857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03503037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92838645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391829277","doi":"10.35293/esi.18","title":"Thetha Sizwe: Contemporary South African Debates on African Languages and the Politics of Gender and Sexualities","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill-Queen's University Press","funders":"Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Human sexuality; Gender studies; Politics; Sociology; Anthropology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05538654389901528,"score_gpt":0.3290674640315581,"score_spread":0.27368092013254286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391829277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03286708,0.15299286,0.0018784837,0.08575329,0.004129136,0.000048590373,0.00004352922,0.000035784724,0.72225124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43274322,0.096611775,0.0015144914,0.009411429,0.00191245,0.00020703721,0.00006216302,0.000113927665,0.45742345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995436,0.00027063393,0.000009585029,0.000026739668,0.00009177366,0.00005768265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994722,0.00040056524,0.000028895247,0.000021469767,0.000042588214,0.000034270262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011560936,0.0005141522,0.00029421397,0.0011039339,0.006853047,0.0052557467,0.00042024595,0.0016147846,0.0057019964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018006329,0.00023510779,0.00015979106,0.0021232015,0.010115404,0.005316162,0.0023307854,0.0030973712,0.00068360363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015969363,0.000017415075,0.00024694248,0.00026634574,0.0000027562164,0.00030228813,0.08421971,0.00010739277,0.0004893035,0.83205914,0.056467887,0.02580472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034298891,0.00001275679,0.0007930596,0.0006112282,0.0000035276194,0.0002733509,0.031712446,0.00011581923,0.000228152,0.072460495,0.8937792,0.000006398009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051012654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01310804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006853047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003994321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029861943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02898091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392423549","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.205","title":"Policing Intimate Partner Violence in the Witbank Policing Area","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Medical emergency; Domestic violence; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Forensic engineering; Medicine; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.07460170175104085,"score_gpt":0.3916594819470437,"score_spread":0.31705778019600284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392423549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99478406,0.0005517975,0.00015585209,0.0007481941,0.000019406345,0.00007809324,0.00002869073,0.000002467475,0.0036314204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99607337,0.0013909905,0.00038154848,0.00015161384,0.000011165159,0.00007317519,0.00002321876,0.0000025906265,0.0018923258],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989613,0.00047847469,0.00005832615,0.00007418384,0.00009909981,0.00032863213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984944,0.0004195461,0.00065891445,0.000053979395,0.00008858908,0.0002846323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010421308,0.0002526847,0.00030311092,0.0010376757,0.0061817304,0.0021995218,0.00058972486,0.0007180551,0.0032200406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033695642,0.00046532546,0.000108702705,0.0020265153,0.0031004718,0.0018905011,0.0028529332,0.00085957773,0.0002672287],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013450794,0.0001624011,0.13958313,0.00079400605,0.00003310615,0.014582507,0.7690016,0.00019063086,0.005096954,0.004044893,0.0026463433,0.063729875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066055195,0.00016407446,0.10079151,0.00039776304,0.000011364005,0.0025134508,0.87959117,0.00008521004,0.0004666345,0.0006626505,0.0152900955,0.000019517882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022449438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07776429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022449438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002008487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045836857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0446375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392815258","doi":"10.29173/jaed240","title":"Interview With The Nominees In CANDO’s Economic Developer Awards","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Aboriginal Economic Development","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Computer science; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.014212323103150282,"score_gpt":0.31949835976610347,"score_spread":0.3052860366629532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392815258","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41854906,0.004249042,0.0015701836,0.436878,0.008986202,0.0006904493,0.0009114835,0.0001159824,0.12804958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67055255,0.0040753065,0.00093040493,0.10573473,0.0014298407,0.00073311204,0.00023156496,0.0000954528,0.21621706],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814713,0.0008705067,0.000073187184,0.00010812631,0.00030323674,0.0004979448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924682,0.0021618707,0.0005170386,0.00012633835,0.0012531711,0.0034734735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036437116,0.00037351673,0.0005662161,0.00069838605,0.016816761,0.0040667644,0.0006838119,0.0049930396,0.011806498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012446529,0.0007250804,0.00026684577,0.0008712495,0.0032777912,0.002678935,0.0018340687,0.010785223,0.0020156375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014707475,0.0002782577,0.012791251,0.00018383801,0.00001123063,0.0050059976,0.48681307,0.00018423397,0.001824548,0.008796435,0.4747742,0.009189851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008726756,0.00005927593,0.005744193,0.000108526256,0.0000031013406,0.00060199376,0.42562065,0.00010689314,0.00018895826,0.00030263537,0.56720203,0.000053052423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10802112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1850182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89197886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006557204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057472647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21478474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392938312","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4744088","title":"Palpable and Enforceable: A Normative Framework for a Stronger Damages Remedy under Section 24(1) of the Charter","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Damages; Normative; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Advertising","score_opus":0.015353777911201566,"score_gpt":0.3091001661177299,"score_spread":0.2937463882065283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392938312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025831187,0.0010074186,0.1810364,0.11201277,0.0021409607,0.00084928516,0.0007374792,0.00056386227,0.67582065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81236386,0.00042286768,0.080238655,0.037518915,0.0032193942,0.0027850643,0.00017410438,0.00038169447,0.06289547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9403166,0.017670449,0.004576873,0.011545944,0.01753252,0.008357624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94282126,0.03050949,0.00489948,0.008121141,0.011531841,0.0021167994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04792302,0.0017841334,0.0028726675,0.004000208,0.012085647,0.021630364,0.008836023,0.046564694,0.018958889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06835971,0.002055211,0.003307279,0.0016976569,0.033654112,0.02328069,0.008469792,0.036500607,0.0027539572],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005889071,0.000020204405,0.000046771376,0.000012490573,0.0000065194217,0.00002627312,0.00020465831,0.00023954516,0.000085537,0.9972235,0.0015548727,0.00057384593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004476498,0.000022167838,0.00017694496,0.00007428969,0.000024916984,0.00005264859,0.00015751924,0.0014552056,0.0002388077,0.9857737,0.011917014,0.00006194433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016730303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021555157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04792302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011458556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022685122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25344414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393015985","doi":"10.1515/9780791485842-010","title":"Affirmative Action as a Way to Overcome Disadvantage: Inspiration from Canadian Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SUNY Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantage; Affirmative action; Law; Action (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.06235362951171484,"score_gpt":0.33478608353961625,"score_spread":0.2724324540279014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393015985","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005273118,0.0072680395,0.0028521137,0.031643063,0.00029677234,0.000060609575,0.000043082164,0.000025635774,0.9525375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53477436,0.015467888,0.00744787,0.013187565,0.00027544075,0.00020750254,0.000052021565,0.00016200243,0.42842534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968928,0.0006375189,0.000062455554,0.00027229975,0.0011176306,0.0010171722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973347,0.0014716466,0.000086877306,0.000114825016,0.00068383844,0.0003080573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003680007,0.0009910294,0.000674079,0.0030798318,0.02173261,0.013093582,0.0022634089,0.0088637825,0.013173023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057863602,0.0003858057,0.00040651127,0.00436186,0.04400272,0.0056577567,0.003942067,0.0077048214,0.0009168958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029191838,0.000009804584,0.00007370183,0.000032086064,0.0000016356626,0.00007535627,0.010379202,0.000107755375,0.000035744233,0.9707383,0.009489603,0.009053894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002454585,0.000013280912,0.00085712736,0.00055275136,0.000017058885,0.00013664225,0.014171239,0.00045712278,0.00027266963,0.3510454,0.632409,0.00004319165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9233123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9577425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08137688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08137688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.095003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59043336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394703372","doi":"10.25071/hdveps73","title":"Shifting ground: New approaches to Charter analysis in the criminal context","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada Watch","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Context (archaeology); Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.10661858684562299,"score_gpt":0.27774926760301777,"score_spread":0.1711306807573948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394703372","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021543957,0.0030168914,0.80816483,0.0288574,0.00089338026,0.0002864537,0.00025436614,0.00026193928,0.1367208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53778887,0.0023919577,0.4401554,0.0020167446,0.001881747,0.00083597476,0.0002781344,0.00033681237,0.014314366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9728581,0.019688325,0.000818256,0.0022616908,0.0031244429,0.0012491737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97151506,0.018968426,0.0019772337,0.0038946392,0.0026103184,0.0010343177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019735266,0.0010038179,0.0013667184,0.011241348,0.008393075,0.020981003,0.005109573,0.0060153306,0.010660494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04906221,0.00069713,0.0016642966,0.012486977,0.05197098,0.029555025,0.008915507,0.007814665,0.0011300682],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006022141,0.000012770837,0.00029035678,0.000014230114,0.0000037693144,0.000036002522,0.0031353163,0.0007452596,0.000017767758,0.98221064,0.0010923166,0.012435715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006030336,0.000007080107,0.00024288436,0.00006918718,0.0000045031156,0.000023945502,0.0031996486,0.0046506245,0.000040795498,0.9741674,0.017573498,0.000014431617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01680801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022263667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98319197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011763482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008894982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10437131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4397039188","doi":"10.21275/sr23625065717","title":"Women's Access to and Control over the 5 Forms of Capital in Machakos Town Sub-County, Kenya","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre; Global Affairs Canada; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Capital (architecture); Geography; Socioeconomics; Economic growth; Political science; Business; Economics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.05259580457452125,"score_gpt":0.43845251265743856,"score_spread":0.38585670808291733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4397039188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986332,0.00010504762,0.000025210875,0.0001051675,0.0000016512571,0.000011803754,0.000022019532,3.1223473e-7,0.001095441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987779,0.00020618759,0.000073771924,0.00005048225,0.0000016550835,0.000026181979,0.000017193044,5.6404735e-7,0.0008460207],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994778,0.00021972775,0.000017896862,0.000053768552,0.000043161745,0.00018769967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943703,0.00027313016,0.00014127516,0.000011759134,0.000043164433,0.000093659815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075800734,0.00025197043,0.00025708586,0.00068518304,0.0044234344,0.0011842072,0.0003311637,0.0004007081,0.0025143535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015225781,0.0003099804,0.00007972804,0.00071854796,0.0017564154,0.0011464101,0.0011861004,0.0004183785,0.00012853573],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014927071,0.00015686221,0.23380004,0.00015197172,0.000011551606,0.0012976925,0.74454194,0.000030185147,0.0019700204,0.0013417994,0.000529757,0.016018892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058245996,0.00015036791,0.16829811,0.00007984693,0.000010114039,0.0002692974,0.8275164,0.000043418768,0.00022094538,0.00015308001,0.0032429001,0.0000097501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025096495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09396048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025096495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016515064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013895783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04990083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399082956","doi":"10.29173/mlj910","title":"The Politics of the 1960s: South Africa, Civil Rights, and the Rule of Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Rule of law; Political science; Law; Civil rights","score_opus":0.014930760063202998,"score_gpt":0.24665087743670888,"score_spread":0.2317201173735059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399082956","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18576826,0.08296444,0.0006541352,0.14536595,0.00087257416,0.000077996854,0.000094434996,0.000021546808,0.5841807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93549436,0.011236115,0.0003127281,0.0081770215,0.00023403364,0.000048216785,0.000020756972,0.000025716057,0.044451084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776673,0.00073689956,0.000069831185,0.0002085882,0.00027831088,0.00093961105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983972,0.0007858522,0.000281062,0.0000992388,0.00012081917,0.00031575467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002544276,0.00059169484,0.000412554,0.0016199189,0.018242095,0.009759519,0.0005144493,0.0042092255,0.006352566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038360078,0.00043268778,0.0002909753,0.002576957,0.03161993,0.0062001017,0.0046562874,0.0074261334,0.0004683149],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030345887,0.000018129638,0.0008648833,0.00009399369,0.0000058003857,0.00076035154,0.06415149,0.000102466125,0.00031136215,0.9165056,0.008146175,0.009009438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007304754,0.000044822318,0.0102478,0.0013767399,0.000015228806,0.00051187,0.057521634,0.0001535679,0.0004176658,0.22172172,0.70786947,0.000046339515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10552971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16449171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10552971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016886597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012022588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20983094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399412387","doi":"10.1007/978-981-19-6056-7_15","title":"Women Human Rights Defenders: A Case of Activism of Mothers of Children with Albinism in Tanzania","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Tanzania; Albinism; Human rights; Political science; Psychology; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Law; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.02151983921128866,"score_gpt":0.28542263052942507,"score_spread":0.26390279131813643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399412387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.866447,0.0023703133,0.00056392467,0.044201348,0.00044047684,0.000114470495,0.000027873104,0.000017984183,0.08581654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96139985,0.00096492557,0.0003196726,0.0043702777,0.00009236797,0.000056580113,0.000009764496,0.000012355893,0.03277424],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848527,0.00045941968,0.000021798387,0.00007067825,0.00008490963,0.00087802316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985129,0.00081374386,0.00018974228,0.000026500049,0.000052012096,0.0004050179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001631329,0.00047695462,0.00028181635,0.000777289,0.02609669,0.003992117,0.0015775664,0.007446226,0.008793602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032412307,0.00047657016,0.00032293887,0.000666338,0.009179172,0.0021789467,0.006154736,0.008162307,0.00038545128],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044452696,0.00009917919,0.004596589,0.000093122966,0.000008903486,0.0331024,0.8669535,0.00008775927,0.0014578487,0.07364824,0.009940133,0.009967901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026846643,0.00010167514,0.009363507,0.00046786535,0.000022916203,0.0058056256,0.86224127,0.00022586333,0.000585124,0.0044974247,0.11664328,0.000018639252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039317966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12779811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039317966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00552537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058042104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07817823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400900206","doi":"10.1177/14624745241266478","title":"Penal-welfare systems in a (post)colonial world: The rise and disregard of alcohol and drug rehabilitation centers in South Africa","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Punishment & Society","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Rehabilitation; Welfare; Political science; Criminology; Political economy; Sociology; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.011837325739133672,"score_gpt":0.28376865795533274,"score_spread":0.2719313322161991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400900206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97980356,0.0013353166,0.000059181657,0.008761573,0.000027933289,0.000012226028,0.000023067052,0.000001898987,0.009975241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977998,0.0007303491,0.000028476665,0.0004146882,0.000008126389,0.0000060608404,0.0000054320944,0.000002137763,0.0010050094],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982687,0.0006128301,0.00006194147,0.00007807505,0.00014421834,0.0008341649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843174,0.0003448719,0.00055049756,0.000057519228,0.00015179031,0.00046359413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012529201,0.00016590206,0.00019352698,0.0010793055,0.01013386,0.003861799,0.00048285248,0.00095745217,0.004392933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029197843,0.00024481403,0.00010183821,0.0021481814,0.010159478,0.0020167227,0.005571621,0.0016186275,0.00016640396],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110048284,0.00010182909,0.074084856,0.00036275006,0.000025738227,0.004633986,0.77011836,0.0002608686,0.0019896654,0.10220464,0.004173066,0.041934215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023822973,0.00011099139,0.31933567,0.0006491356,0.000021281525,0.0013556724,0.5820991,0.0001997839,0.00047024305,0.0055725174,0.09012019,0.000041545743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06513602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15733832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06513602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009128876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069772294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12951374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401071066","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4909207","title":"Civil Asset Forfeiture's Part In Funding Police Budgets","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Asset (computer security); Business; Finance; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.024049657615773053,"score_gpt":0.3397189862088488,"score_spread":0.3156693285930758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401071066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26911652,0.005734012,0.0037446423,0.11967031,0.0011461889,0.00041534845,0.00087786745,0.00015126845,0.59914374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9447109,0.0012693554,0.00077555823,0.004340885,0.00038396489,0.0001389484,0.00009137364,0.00006417692,0.048224814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935407,0.0018258443,0.00020871143,0.00026251303,0.0011009218,0.0030613493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96906507,0.016965168,0.003295611,0.0018717384,0.0034175867,0.0053848387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009038963,0.0003279105,0.0005462101,0.0024302215,0.0032490073,0.008813291,0.0013071813,0.004811079,0.033363264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062622935,0.0005266083,0.0003174089,0.0023933619,0.0026632547,0.005336008,0.0047337757,0.0042706365,0.0013237271],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038557182,0.00017932689,0.032415733,0.00052168017,0.00010095116,0.0007675599,0.010705397,0.0014137259,0.0009734918,0.75568575,0.07585666,0.12099413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023208815,0.0004263825,0.09210614,0.0025492972,0.00018644343,0.0010662491,0.019329248,0.0022722841,0.0018480376,0.107455984,0.7724238,0.00010403003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02393207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040698715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033363264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007891104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02157463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11161119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401177462","doi":"10.1163/24056901-10020017","title":"A Deficiency of Available Remedies in Cases of Labor Trafficking: Ontario’s First Civil Precedent","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Labor Rights Case Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.0294594359829718,"score_gpt":0.3032932549320054,"score_spread":0.2738338189490336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401177462","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.077551916,0.005407543,0.0029750697,0.23762408,0.0012135307,0.00042112824,0.0012921165,0.00014783055,0.67336684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70707357,0.0061092917,0.008907663,0.055886768,0.00036449698,0.00025083593,0.0005357718,0.00017200879,0.22069961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847002,0.0011867938,0.0008763245,0.0011742073,0.007895184,0.00416733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9652224,0.012710812,0.0011416167,0.0017946558,0.016012458,0.003117999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009119496,0.0004247425,0.0006982853,0.0035422172,0.03100355,0.009804293,0.004069912,0.0115236575,0.010557769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04078667,0.0011442406,0.0009863968,0.003238162,0.010254466,0.0034887514,0.0036506718,0.009711145,0.0008646878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105376654,0.00010546724,0.012106802,0.0006165185,0.00007915465,0.0022317497,0.030467913,0.0006972881,0.0013935099,0.5706726,0.3162559,0.06526776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060388622,0.000040624283,0.022958536,0.0011705005,0.00014542232,0.00054808846,0.016727334,0.00068216375,0.0019048827,0.02210703,0.9334551,0.0001999296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9733247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9940645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07879128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07879128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27752298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57167345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401177553","doi":"10.1163/17087384-bja10096","title":"Constitutional Damages in South Africa: A Transformative Approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ernest Oppenheimer Memorial Trust","keywords":"Damages; Constructive; Adjudication; Transformative learning; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Justiciability; Constitutional court; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Human rights","score_opus":0.060804941012245164,"score_gpt":0.3481304359984687,"score_spread":0.28732549498622356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401177553","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11509268,0.010834312,0.110642985,0.10329188,0.00091563095,0.00036626513,0.00012975639,0.000055841756,0.6586706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845388,0.0015426131,0.006323338,0.0012578955,0.00014439315,0.00008180721,0.000010126259,0.000013316901,0.0060878117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954411,0.0025712536,0.00022200415,0.00040215804,0.00077495043,0.0005884157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916208,0.006388046,0.0006380529,0.0006047217,0.00059059844,0.00015777335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0110428715,0.0004450417,0.00047995948,0.0036522904,0.0062758857,0.010436332,0.0014499445,0.0047474857,0.005225849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015880803,0.0004429361,0.000555301,0.0018788947,0.046259724,0.010660172,0.006497842,0.0077411295,0.00022767852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018523848,0.0000027003678,0.0000293806,0.000010606562,0.0000010792259,0.000078910816,0.0018298422,0.00017504492,0.000055008775,0.9965917,0.000102231315,0.0011216543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072842467,0.000015111529,0.0002804019,0.00017652525,0.0000066552616,0.00012818734,0.003917964,0.00084951025,0.00057439995,0.95421976,0.03980674,0.000017421087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049100537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051168865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013847165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013847165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006161109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100468695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401655519","doi":"10.1515/9782763754376-021","title":"UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES: BILL 101 AND THE ENGLISH-SPEAKING BLACK COMMUNITY","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unintended consequences; Political science; History; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.05589281031623833,"score_gpt":0.2979732299066317,"score_spread":0.2420804195903934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401655519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060848603,0.02651395,0.00040710502,0.26518705,0.0054606562,0.00005567112,0.0001468463,0.000028439614,0.6961155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.089535296,0.0099071115,0.00027866478,0.11015926,0.0011105603,0.00011291252,0.0000856736,0.000053895423,0.78875667],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980342,0.0005237339,0.000029987656,0.00007630214,0.000803498,0.00053229067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986082,0.0005694984,0.000068566005,0.0000555006,0.00041603667,0.00028228087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025057732,0.00031179312,0.0003064665,0.0005186603,0.010716362,0.0046974756,0.0007639691,0.0057096444,0.012480005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047697052,0.00024082352,0.00029065312,0.00066509005,0.0058486597,0.0025176948,0.0017943223,0.0067761503,0.0015099791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008686232,0.000022634951,0.00050242315,0.000035735753,0.000002873225,0.00030755965,0.004450208,0.00007514831,0.00004411308,0.2621286,0.7166068,0.015815308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009292262,0.000009461504,0.0024933438,0.0006956531,0.000007332161,0.0001684743,0.0056375912,0.00006520418,0.00009245286,0.02625288,0.9645454,0.000022878321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41487724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61409116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58512276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010786185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02902808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82492477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401764731","doi":"10.53555/sfs.v10i2.2961","title":"Mapping The Role Of Uniform Civil Code To Achieve The Goal Of Gender Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Code (set theory); Computer science; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Programming language","score_opus":0.2210486129728544,"score_gpt":0.336113366063578,"score_spread":0.11506475309072359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401764731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29276884,0.0071803723,0.04520351,0.12769228,0.0011709508,0.0008955539,0.0007263357,0.00021011596,0.5241521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97550696,0.0012108944,0.011361244,0.0053428793,0.00007429039,0.00019299991,0.00015486873,0.000074075746,0.0060816566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795442,0.00919807,0.0009974402,0.0014109612,0.005067248,0.0037820833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96807766,0.013918995,0.0032807956,0.0032173053,0.008908589,0.002596577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019903598,0.00039167216,0.00033371945,0.0045126323,0.0071721333,0.01008274,0.0015704632,0.0023519301,0.006733914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05766686,0.00030783578,0.00042791627,0.0045391577,0.012304135,0.008087921,0.0064370595,0.004292003,0.0008814735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031387393,0.00007569562,0.029277476,0.00035356687,0.000017326627,0.00037235496,0.018792802,0.00059039297,0.00049029227,0.85728437,0.008520807,0.08419349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003168812,0.00028698315,0.108744934,0.005515068,0.00011741898,0.0007497814,0.13681199,0.004082284,0.0034767694,0.28830862,0.45171428,0.00016019073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05063686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048971456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05063686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014090754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056124467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.105261564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401904676","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4920291","title":"Billing Without Bilking: Regulating Time-Based Legal Fees Billing Without Bilking: Regulating Time-Based Legal Fees","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.01341578412402166,"score_gpt":0.29053444142036283,"score_spread":0.27711865729634116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401904676","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.101571426,0.001765812,0.085873626,0.042968415,0.0024869782,0.001587975,0.0006194751,0.0016905557,0.76143575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84758574,0.0004443339,0.03226351,0.022357713,0.0013860128,0.0009598244,0.0001660947,0.0006437913,0.09419304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94832706,0.009734144,0.0035727876,0.006382195,0.023624416,0.008359472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9408884,0.023763321,0.0059855054,0.009735788,0.016266048,0.0033608961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022170888,0.0007176395,0.0010268922,0.002893696,0.00444457,0.019969922,0.0050838804,0.013544039,0.014633179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09226353,0.001348628,0.0019537525,0.0019539283,0.0063291797,0.009745193,0.0058791456,0.015412021,0.004313375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001546383,0.00019274914,0.0027994076,0.00014297683,0.00005786137,0.00031349083,0.0017892509,0.0014521267,0.0039889994,0.93987286,0.023971267,0.025264345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004521309,0.0006781126,0.023611976,0.0013575457,0.00065175496,0.0015312403,0.0018775546,0.01836488,0.017700396,0.45247594,0.48049662,0.00080186233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021929335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017102541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022170888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0086944355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019374905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11725223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402054989","doi":"10.1080/00083968.2024.2354912","title":"Multi-layered encounters between Reclaim the City and the Cape Town municipality","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cape; Geography; Archaeology; Environmental planning","score_opus":0.08024490972404218,"score_gpt":0.3151783108301456,"score_spread":0.2349334011061034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402054989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83481115,0.0010927189,0.00383701,0.025398277,0.0002032174,0.00016671073,0.000051356226,0.00003091309,0.13440867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902328,0.00026808027,0.00062989077,0.00034006298,0.00001909172,0.000037980153,0.0000069096914,0.000011293878,0.008453753],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99430424,0.003914799,0.00009082921,0.0002851587,0.00043079487,0.0009742922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947466,0.003379987,0.0006184794,0.00024949847,0.00018782837,0.00081755326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041066264,0.00041978812,0.00036116736,0.0014634215,0.026363809,0.009673477,0.001313041,0.0028797511,0.006581832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008341824,0.00040969357,0.00028321697,0.0016366701,0.03174218,0.004946326,0.011067932,0.0041884826,0.00031141704],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020655474,0.00001851167,0.0021868274,0.000057334255,0.000008885952,0.0032094046,0.9128595,0.00015991002,0.00057227,0.07294604,0.0017195636,0.0062411446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006035848,0.00002422996,0.004077169,0.0001906783,0.000007887086,0.000580313,0.8873982,0.00016572485,0.0002610649,0.0063741966,0.100888856,0.000025680516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.063129015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13098225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063129015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013559541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075970963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12552309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402335981","doi":"10.1177/00943061241269350v","title":"Fractured Militancy: Precarious Resistance in South Africa after Racial Inclusion","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Resistance (ecology); Inclusion (mineral); Political science; Gender studies; Development economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.042289714176997305,"score_gpt":0.344434641964908,"score_spread":0.3021449277879107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402335981","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06711185,0.599857,0.00026929058,0.28694126,0.0043789265,0.00006681352,0.000052430583,0.000008346272,0.04131415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67098945,0.27835286,0.0004734462,0.03843937,0.0018945102,0.00013970409,0.00003437664,0.000032602322,0.009643692],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99484104,0.0029811545,0.00029103068,0.00031562173,0.00052366644,0.0010474463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886508,0.007882443,0.0016299944,0.00028811255,0.00085821474,0.00069051364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008801033,0.00039816395,0.0008311634,0.002219248,0.0067425817,0.0075509674,0.0015935017,0.00724723,0.0075702663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028347054,0.0003568422,0.00049252494,0.0037241052,0.017975332,0.00810372,0.0057923384,0.0065376977,0.00035824502],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019063501,0.00010391735,0.0030689656,0.009349423,0.000112007205,0.0030526135,0.40558943,0.00012556935,0.00046589648,0.373416,0.037515074,0.16701052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068662,0.00012702834,0.013140627,0.032979183,0.00018184847,0.0016160703,0.34795198,0.000061623505,0.00058595417,0.054494917,0.54873425,0.000057891917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02766535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050981056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02766535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009129997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022961447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06624311},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4402729297","doi":"10.1016/j.exis.2024.101542","title":"Sand mining governance in post-apartheid South Africa: Interlegalities of resource extraction on the Wild Coast","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Extractive Industries and Society","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Corporate governance; Resource (disambiguation); Extraction (chemistry); Sand mining; Political science; Fishery; Geography; Business; Biology; Finance","score_opus":0.03902330021030556,"score_gpt":0.2945714815110332,"score_spread":0.25554818130072765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402729297","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94458586,0.00046562686,0.00020696917,0.0051556276,0.000009004334,0.00003405464,0.00005949637,0.0000039430206,0.049479537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969043,0.00016447209,0.000050072827,0.00007227857,0.0000014267276,0.000007671143,0.0000063691364,0.0000015043889,0.002791954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992854,0.00015934532,0.000022982967,0.000050808303,0.000059931528,0.00042150653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990068,0.00036908683,0.00031040638,0.00004907676,0.000092074144,0.00017270375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006733721,0.000108211854,0.00014741672,0.00090657437,0.004123632,0.003927475,0.00045721635,0.00078157533,0.0068582282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023994572,0.00019199048,0.00008194605,0.0022892721,0.006024224,0.0021856814,0.003043769,0.0009720493,0.00016148096],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001659911,0.000117513635,0.090103224,0.00031534545,0.00003400335,0.0057587945,0.31605497,0.00093827647,0.0031437678,0.5372292,0.0038006378,0.042338327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023764245,0.00009297505,0.36867136,0.0004937614,0.000025590341,0.00083956524,0.4875847,0.00065264205,0.00087513117,0.03423348,0.10647388,0.000033162563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08164861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29497507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08164861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007496043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008283874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16234672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402747029","doi":"10.1080/00083968.2024.2374572","title":"People and municipalities: decentralisation and the articulation of agency in local political arenas in Africa","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Decentralization; Articulation (sociology); Politics; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.0435911658284073,"score_gpt":0.2872933302576541,"score_spread":0.24370216442924678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402747029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8230018,0.0071491143,0.0015450005,0.029069226,0.00010483814,0.00006932914,0.000056810917,0.000012598001,0.13899116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99734527,0.0008051069,0.000098678654,0.00015670552,0.000016623084,0.000009941292,0.0000046416585,0.0000029674388,0.001560087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99276274,0.004904364,0.00016705635,0.0002510026,0.0004011397,0.0015135215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937935,0.0031541523,0.001303071,0.00019083788,0.0004082919,0.0011501546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065264404,0.00016153685,0.0003357612,0.001666553,0.008674415,0.0076536858,0.0006760107,0.0013826025,0.0045707347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0131262,0.00032380671,0.00023814311,0.0030801469,0.019481404,0.005850537,0.006916381,0.0018440763,0.00017953277],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010879655,0.00007499809,0.024363963,0.00021919275,0.000023833856,0.00094341126,0.4415746,0.0007706966,0.00021939487,0.50536466,0.003920523,0.022415878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000769717,0.000076774784,0.0703179,0.0009024979,0.000045204728,0.00042519026,0.70890194,0.0006508156,0.00020091691,0.10894229,0.1094019,0.000057634956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07735915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13631359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07735915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011781052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011053438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15381771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403372054","doi":"10.1080/02697459.2024.2409462","title":"Rights and planning: challenges, progress, and approaches","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Practice and Research","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental planning; Political science; Engineering ethics; Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Environmental science","score_opus":0.3409412562101764,"score_gpt":0.49613189840231714,"score_spread":0.15519064219214074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403372054","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027587428,0.07251559,0.010295513,0.7930642,0.0036943227,0.00005060037,0.00007487284,0.00006566298,0.11748053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5118735,0.31414044,0.037209556,0.05595707,0.013008172,0.0005235283,0.0002505919,0.0004189441,0.066618174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832009,0.011403409,0.00052595005,0.0008885685,0.002528753,0.0014525389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.960341,0.031244598,0.0010774264,0.0023932944,0.0024358218,0.002507955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03815199,0.0008619895,0.0013894235,0.0039669964,0.009465533,0.030182948,0.0033847354,0.007518095,0.013727651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031925973,0.0007192183,0.0007891783,0.0070872456,0.0600272,0.04846257,0.0146929845,0.015251844,0.0013767789],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045895354,0.000014556331,0.00020387958,0.0001799224,0.0000037448979,0.000045238892,0.006316344,0.0002626305,0.000021426233,0.9429739,0.02412859,0.025845312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035192904,0.000008607684,0.00020119821,0.0010250912,0.0000027232654,0.000051900483,0.024832487,0.00032036513,0.00004589441,0.79266006,0.18083265,0.0000155324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014711864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019953292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03815199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014798651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03052001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20176947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403732074","doi":"10.54195/eirj.15838","title":"Exceptions to the binding force of a debtor’s arbitration agreement on the Insolvency Practitioner","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Insolvency and Restructuring Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Insolvency; Arbitration; Business; Bankruptcy; Agreement; Law; Creditor; Political science; Finance; Debt; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03859897225367584,"score_gpt":0.30528454188136284,"score_spread":0.26668556962768697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403732074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11806809,0.0011320409,0.042082436,0.05237435,0.0015152838,0.00065927097,0.0003151155,0.00034274883,0.7835106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8802396,0.00039669863,0.02026898,0.028407313,0.0007579636,0.0005960064,0.00011879182,0.00011174805,0.06910281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9230903,0.017556736,0.009570201,0.011723145,0.02524253,0.012817121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93259424,0.040246997,0.0036329264,0.008164042,0.012673395,0.0026883644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052534893,0.0004958381,0.0017251127,0.0021899755,0.011234598,0.01466488,0.0055760266,0.026430642,0.004954284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09375643,0.0015704952,0.0021315385,0.0018827405,0.014917901,0.0054012258,0.008572665,0.025752474,0.001839503],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034088665,0.00003323577,0.00068413204,0.000021682357,0.000025090834,0.00036579947,0.002916509,0.00032137285,0.0006407643,0.98548675,0.005906269,0.0035643233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030561784,0.00017467969,0.005191865,0.0007323438,0.00021563275,0.0005044508,0.003302713,0.0070878244,0.004289672,0.710321,0.2674914,0.0003828261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.073525086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.091014415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073525086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0105840815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035848644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27783442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403761697","doi":"10.61955/efslli","title":"Will clear rules fix statutory interpretation? Canadian experience with Judge Kavanaugh’s proposed “rules of the road”","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of legislative drafting and law reform.","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.011160227634690944,"score_gpt":0.3005250053962475,"score_spread":0.28936477776155656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403761697","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078400046,0.00586519,0.007173531,0.5505002,0.001898941,0.00022127511,0.0002402418,0.00011634099,0.3555842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75709105,0.0056450656,0.009450082,0.13280165,0.0004492377,0.00015511329,0.00013343169,0.00022242803,0.09405195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9504313,0.0152452765,0.001719531,0.0030493503,0.018378075,0.011176511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9431732,0.030258676,0.0016665562,0.0022535822,0.019974437,0.0026736122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05103556,0.0005165952,0.00068262714,0.0022945188,0.04664125,0.020326627,0.005501645,0.021303741,0.008413885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09487666,0.0010027053,0.0010889382,0.0043500355,0.035133965,0.007660222,0.0059490954,0.033660937,0.0009934542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058590827,0.00006541261,0.0019147347,0.00011280942,0.00002238763,0.001136671,0.06775643,0.0006515281,0.0005503445,0.78730184,0.11762893,0.022800343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001338053,0.000062615625,0.006046163,0.0005503461,0.00008645944,0.0003565964,0.046441372,0.0010264821,0.0020230305,0.086843766,0.85609764,0.00033183614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9317753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96809524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08660008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08660008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18239827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62833047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404042131","doi":"10.7202/1114025ar","title":"Le statut juridique de l’<i>Accord d’Arusha pour la paix et la réconciliation au Burundi</i> à la lumière de l’arrêt de la Division d’appel de la Cour de justice de la Communauté des États de l’Afrique de l’Est dans l’affaire <i>The East African Civil Society Organizations’ Forum vs The Attorney General of Burundi and Two Others</i>","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Conciliation; Philosophy; Law; Arbitration","score_opus":0.009402461292829284,"score_gpt":0.2864156319494153,"score_spread":0.277013170656586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404042131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13032404,0.011048842,0.011726538,0.054162044,0.0029093586,0.00024847296,0.00020914862,0.00010954795,0.789262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8332978,0.0022808188,0.0050135106,0.011948248,0.0008701995,0.00043705123,0.0001095279,0.00006974957,0.14597319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98902786,0.0035389676,0.00069152145,0.0014149365,0.0033035604,0.0020231125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931456,0.0030735126,0.0011175082,0.0006255568,0.0015353609,0.0005025229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010712727,0.00045974876,0.00055014424,0.0013650982,0.0109085245,0.010503811,0.001554603,0.00768436,0.0076925377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014338034,0.00068283797,0.00053781073,0.0017526954,0.009228926,0.004898948,0.006334691,0.012025006,0.00095988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028848553,0.000014485809,0.00095517765,0.000055504417,0.00000676326,0.00012829731,0.006884041,0.0000948445,0.00039805064,0.97754943,0.005976824,0.007907796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008692216,0.00015932182,0.01792931,0.00084228447,0.000055468237,0.0005606946,0.014524386,0.00076315424,0.0019567655,0.18892102,0.7740196,0.00018103594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031991888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04467207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031991888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064252494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013470265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06361139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404585783","doi":"10.21991/cf29482","title":"The Prudent Parliament and Section 24(1)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Section (typography); Political science; Computer science; Law; Operating system; Politics","score_opus":0.018328256684608444,"score_gpt":0.2984950539539075,"score_spread":0.28016679726929905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404585783","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045741346,0.0036710836,0.005068171,0.09315629,0.0022927658,0.00027363343,0.00044266914,0.00015656336,0.8491974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71075577,0.0006710717,0.0040961667,0.049620505,0.0010199185,0.0003126982,0.00013051806,0.00007075938,0.2333227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99009806,0.0020454733,0.00045827506,0.0018714372,0.0028263412,0.002700419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99550605,0.0020620339,0.0005188904,0.0005555714,0.0008410062,0.0005164111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067193694,0.00032762554,0.00042369304,0.0006507241,0.009861866,0.009220607,0.0015273192,0.015500242,0.0058121793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01230639,0.00071196246,0.0004990558,0.00059774483,0.014757989,0.0021726617,0.0026614163,0.009765391,0.0010168401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009573416,0.000009870133,0.0002670331,0.000015039609,0.0000028258266,0.00014853886,0.0025173088,0.000056808123,0.00021641978,0.9794881,0.014611408,0.0026570905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040475996,0.000057686044,0.0052362,0.00021213062,0.000024668283,0.00033083814,0.0014751418,0.00019604756,0.0013303863,0.21088505,0.78012544,0.00008595089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13716955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18698147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13716955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00969038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025216063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27274227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404586346","doi":"10.21991/cf29480","title":"Not Merely Interpretative","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.02562652841561336,"score_gpt":0.32874291388411897,"score_spread":0.3031163854685056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404586346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019754386,0.004651638,0.11028211,0.09201068,0.0040100412,0.00017925285,0.00045141455,0.00035450555,0.7683059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.802809,0.00370499,0.029127585,0.04594399,0.0049893856,0.0005023502,0.00063096505,0.00073352683,0.111558355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98088545,0.007933098,0.0010744695,0.0027394923,0.005954723,0.0014127583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977241,0.010716256,0.0017528617,0.006266933,0.0035586406,0.00046435982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016982945,0.00077954656,0.0006351123,0.0020769048,0.004106845,0.011038665,0.0032993224,0.0051969257,0.008665485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030098708,0.000573048,0.00071909017,0.0013276569,0.035642795,0.017050415,0.00631128,0.011144539,0.0025278316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007777015,0.000005140039,0.0001279369,0.000046739413,0.000005251043,0.000055488126,0.0037290307,0.00006446122,0.00020404464,0.9889604,0.0036703844,0.003123268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021941429,0.000029336585,0.0004808548,0.0004690117,0.000039806917,0.00021688256,0.0051634163,0.00040482267,0.0014076687,0.65031594,0.34141582,0.00003452036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004179957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004341098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016982945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004576605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006123237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08981544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404741362","doi":"10.13162/hro-ors.v11i3.5740","title":"Equality, Self-determination, Administrative Discretion: Lessons from the Implementation of Jordan Principles in Two Provinces","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Reform Observer - Observatoire des Réformes de Santé","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Administrative discretion; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.11441554133027304,"score_gpt":0.4723979715718027,"score_spread":0.35798243024152965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404741362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.564186,0.0033331108,0.00424924,0.09459316,0.0004239608,0.0004077329,0.00013145716,0.00005870903,0.33261666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95506936,0.001140921,0.0030029193,0.005007289,0.000031887917,0.000073015006,0.000054130105,0.000046034704,0.03557446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98585224,0.004465115,0.00031809948,0.00053515896,0.0026152094,0.0062140427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98749954,0.0035137834,0.00045035998,0.00077266863,0.0044246246,0.0033390443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013626698,0.00031057143,0.000706347,0.0008181012,0.040195685,0.014532662,0.0036735246,0.00394757,0.0035369783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016879087,0.0005179173,0.00065167056,0.0019344056,0.021881789,0.0044759507,0.009951107,0.009040053,0.00026198718],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025815645,0.00040946086,0.022275096,0.00020624774,0.000051938743,0.002621241,0.23276858,0.0024882094,0.00030276694,0.66063863,0.016570508,0.061409272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023649444,0.00014863575,0.031510152,0.000828841,0.00006564828,0.00038847091,0.49580923,0.0032275089,0.0011391442,0.07386782,0.3925565,0.00022158102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96349525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9812199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86724466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13275534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29255438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9632119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404972541","doi":"10.1080/07053436.2024.2423302","title":"De l’émergence des programmes <i>Car Wash</i> à la production d’un espace collectif dans la ville de Port-au-Prince","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Loisir et Société / Society and Leisure","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"ESPACE; Port (circuit theory); Humanities; Art; Engineering","score_opus":0.01512876552614055,"score_gpt":0.31561995786081715,"score_spread":0.3004911923346766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404972541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.891386,0.00063945114,0.0024515602,0.004369518,0.00004947588,0.00009352018,0.000059102207,0.000019354089,0.100931995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843396,0.0003440269,0.0006302245,0.0001262269,0.000019262076,0.00004644425,0.000018492578,0.000010350085,0.014465404],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931335,0.00034126025,0.000011745777,0.000059389327,0.00008943573,0.00018471046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984768,0.0005292843,0.00030994095,0.000116939205,0.00012674904,0.0004402701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001419645,0.00023711249,0.00009386004,0.00056300714,0.004783501,0.0023099654,0.0004163226,0.0007715605,0.009795872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021272798,0.00022662897,0.00014818014,0.00069909095,0.0057084616,0.0019263927,0.0023463035,0.0017445061,0.0005263451],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012566498,0.00020455685,0.034314506,0.00040525096,0.000012339615,0.005526084,0.7339488,0.00021040309,0.0062522655,0.1218738,0.0047373283,0.09238896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020279589,0.0001357222,0.10319618,0.00047464183,0.000009878271,0.0019135154,0.44832867,0.00027250824,0.00237009,0.0033983095,0.43985525,0.000025004794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013648835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020736665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013648835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002197869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030449892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032770455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405565090","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5062166","title":"The Relationship in Mandatory Reporting: Perspectives of Ontario Telephone Screeners and Investigation Workers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.03285755207355996,"score_gpt":0.31953120325108475,"score_spread":0.2866736511775248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405565090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7315083,0.0018931419,0.0003110471,0.20822829,0.00022532273,0.000075029726,0.00015958388,0.0000060399625,0.0575932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97838336,0.0011330674,0.00011590201,0.009536127,0.00011437847,0.000051999512,0.000035253954,0.00001330599,0.010616543],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97418207,0.013990996,0.00059307687,0.00074773224,0.0030342,0.00745193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9243376,0.04141363,0.009308771,0.0011058161,0.009182915,0.01465127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019640345,0.00023070637,0.0004970699,0.00197099,0.04442692,0.017410617,0.0033950354,0.008951485,0.008861918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05809962,0.0008196348,0.0004271179,0.0044638114,0.020680698,0.0058057075,0.008920244,0.008041217,0.00046461166],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011074444,0.00015582953,0.046504214,0.000049940718,0.000012755393,0.001336836,0.91851026,0.00005608521,0.00020428063,0.016309092,0.01058002,0.006169953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015181806,0.00002944089,0.019140657,0.00011106108,0.000009327389,0.000116483185,0.9558247,0.000058516987,0.000069567024,0.0011212105,0.023474978,0.000028857523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8756778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9240934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.124322176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058982976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.102251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42795342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405643556","doi":"10.4000/12z72","title":"Resignations in the heat of the moment: A comparison of South African law with selected common-law countries","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit comparé du travail et de la sécurité sociale","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Moment (physics); Political science; Physics; Classical mechanics","score_opus":0.012927835118672761,"score_gpt":0.29514441896704474,"score_spread":0.282216583848372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405643556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7902312,0.013079831,0.00073310005,0.009252837,0.00012538479,0.00017528114,0.0001254111,0.000012934425,0.18626405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99399865,0.0027778426,0.00015404998,0.00083092245,0.000025917241,0.00004549025,0.000023926888,0.0000080820855,0.0021351029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99462825,0.0020264336,0.0003881531,0.0002682079,0.0008568365,0.001832164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912096,0.004969626,0.0023549579,0.00035971074,0.0006888275,0.000417193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005133047,0.00028362122,0.000438987,0.00554392,0.009539293,0.008519875,0.00080459175,0.0019404007,0.0042589647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013267163,0.00028408616,0.0004029165,0.0071060136,0.01195565,0.0033431437,0.004657083,0.0025625266,0.00027345459],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023577794,0.00011914735,0.04290119,0.0007468423,0.000056240344,0.0039972523,0.13796352,0.00039015457,0.0015173125,0.7742546,0.003291068,0.0345269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012525656,0.00037435416,0.37364855,0.004161461,0.00015593605,0.002545902,0.32157102,0.0006412864,0.0022762825,0.042276133,0.25208196,0.00014182171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0541105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09568189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0541105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009758974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007864936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10759109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407290833","doi":"10.1515/jtl-2025-0003","title":"The (Un)intended Consequences of Legal Transplants: A Comparative Study of Standing in Collective Litigation in Five Jurisdictions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Tort Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Criminal Justice Association","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Business; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.03760755494931052,"score_gpt":0.3622623859285788,"score_spread":0.3246548309792683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407290833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99729925,0.0000897063,0.000065721724,0.00011918056,0.0000028185575,0.000012441872,0.000011609493,5.7950837e-7,0.0023986408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996487,0.00005470887,0.000034390163,0.000031401327,0.000002587217,0.000011819624,0.000009054126,7.464057e-7,0.00020652682],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911594,0.005354088,0.0003574181,0.00049472373,0.001045006,0.0015894703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98051995,0.0117802955,0.0035606415,0.0006278175,0.0021632062,0.0013480586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0083840005,0.00016174109,0.00061409606,0.004694536,0.010318754,0.0049740807,0.0015229465,0.0019066654,0.0049925772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022866102,0.0003391197,0.00042398094,0.0044479743,0.008396855,0.0051265783,0.0056827,0.002007476,0.00024125648],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002698454,0.0008889402,0.13181752,0.00017317258,0.00009277565,0.002008793,0.83221644,0.00034323538,0.0009441954,0.017166158,0.00058934576,0.013489589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011626269,0.00035747062,0.18014555,0.0001208531,0.00003559807,0.00030064,0.814852,0.00027995298,0.00024804354,0.0010904198,0.002531877,0.00002601826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03138751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07597228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03138751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066641853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00289777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06240964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407799883","doi":"10.1163/17087384-bja10106","title":"Re-Appraisal of Legal Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa: Questioning the Legal Pluralism Paradigm","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); International law; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Epistemology; Legal research; Sociology; Legal realism; Philosophy","score_opus":0.034635560253492084,"score_gpt":0.3495001852745393,"score_spread":0.31486462502104723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407799883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42576036,0.044371758,0.028232941,0.2719135,0.0016201123,0.00023538551,0.000113627815,0.000050837036,0.22770149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916468,0.0033400957,0.0021806909,0.0016296741,0.00016317914,0.00003379704,0.000010985602,0.000009699245,0.0009850154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99068856,0.005961397,0.00039777378,0.00046516577,0.0016568401,0.00083031785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9661931,0.0252253,0.0027717699,0.001159222,0.003796034,0.00085452845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018957315,0.00039087576,0.00057279033,0.0072639603,0.008210067,0.010743789,0.0015129527,0.0028402912,0.0022255164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031476762,0.00025767897,0.00033873247,0.0037252267,0.038739648,0.013034567,0.0077583813,0.005849267,0.000109360604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075391567,0.000009024703,0.0011031114,0.0001410478,0.0000055814216,0.00047350486,0.062676266,0.00026434407,0.000099280405,0.922302,0.0011228743,0.0117954025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011310778,0.000036202153,0.005124483,0.0020386293,0.000019348845,0.00046525442,0.24474822,0.0016525129,0.00046390708,0.6213862,0.124020204,0.000033624103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013887398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015616423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018957315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012097741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012311688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1002571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408522727","doi":"10.47348/slr/2024/i2a2","title":"Learning from protected areas – Distilling lessons for a potential future OECM statutory framework in South Africa","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Political science; Environmental planning; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.03733155270315756,"score_gpt":0.33720983957268114,"score_spread":0.29987828686952356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408522727","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11688231,0.016982498,0.012569596,0.6804478,0.0019398067,0.00031907228,0.00019044828,0.00005289789,0.17061563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8995563,0.0126711875,0.011957803,0.04910528,0.0003457639,0.00025273755,0.00011767598,0.00007474314,0.025918547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963546,0.0014620963,0.00018044555,0.00032524616,0.00051267364,0.0011649913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99376786,0.0039488613,0.00040866158,0.00024106642,0.00048566898,0.0011478594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010451126,0.0003668708,0.00041696505,0.0013418276,0.008084972,0.01035864,0.002250153,0.0065697157,0.012955755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014629714,0.0004221727,0.0004105007,0.0016724468,0.01880174,0.02020779,0.010700172,0.012510813,0.0006847826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002148582,0.000064629225,0.0014900538,0.0006570452,0.000007260325,0.002432982,0.07231245,0.0009263375,0.00095160253,0.84914976,0.01777199,0.054214448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019505647,0.00007247345,0.0033645253,0.0033774907,0.000011992249,0.0007364082,0.13176595,0.00079517794,0.0005686252,0.35042998,0.5087827,0.00007519613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030728867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061720848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030728867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01175552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031564288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0852927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409172553","doi":"10.52783/jier.v5i2.2465","title":"Inclusive Justice and Sustainable Legal Protections Against Domestic Violence: A Comparative Study of UK, Canada, and Australia","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Informatics Education and Research","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Domestic violence; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Law; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Environmental health; Medicine","score_opus":0.04049455776163485,"score_gpt":0.4634632471167358,"score_spread":0.42296868935510096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409172553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.988523,0.001345086,0.000042994317,0.0017122023,0.00001812985,0.00005072142,0.000096265285,0.000003501427,0.00820808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952928,0.0017950335,0.00010375772,0.00057889015,0.0000047106178,0.000027199743,0.00006100451,0.000006112642,0.0021304234],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969779,0.0006406266,0.00016087512,0.00020012908,0.0007795413,0.0012409263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99385226,0.0010929401,0.0009131235,0.00013768811,0.0020354819,0.0019685507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018845111,0.0002817895,0.00068172475,0.0033029278,0.01465353,0.004238946,0.0011843934,0.0009167137,0.0031660965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008428131,0.00042922134,0.00035070613,0.007665914,0.0041777403,0.0018691273,0.004008277,0.001653891,0.0002082124],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019028132,0.0004864285,0.25295836,0.00058394414,0.00008540461,0.0027820729,0.6716758,0.00018754973,0.0005066123,0.009023097,0.0059935437,0.055526946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016413598,0.00009516215,0.38959056,0.00048313383,0.00005071274,0.00038091658,0.5911002,0.00019915924,0.00013666206,0.00031668847,0.01757028,0.00006008359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98669356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05830252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05830252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07966312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42301637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409675351","doi":"10.3138/cjwl-02-x","title":"Reasoning from Remedy in <i>R. v Morgentaler</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016044874679068545,"score_gpt":0.2740055504505927,"score_spread":0.25796067577152415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409675351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051653188,0.010284929,0.010777827,0.3973632,0.0032577375,0.00023056005,0.00023490383,0.00013070216,0.5260669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62455624,0.0030682816,0.0064209145,0.29492283,0.0013403088,0.00024969978,0.00007833255,0.00008872348,0.06927472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99225616,0.0023313304,0.00038712347,0.0012721448,0.0017847446,0.0019685351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970709,0.0019227932,0.00026248174,0.0001787408,0.00040043084,0.00016464804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075932466,0.00045221843,0.0004535814,0.0014092213,0.010852486,0.006671876,0.0022365917,0.02150921,0.0035192976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013516945,0.0005278378,0.0010876101,0.00075416884,0.017374322,0.004372945,0.003312994,0.01528625,0.0005246588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075029293,0.0000066447674,0.00019185428,0.000025146517,0.000005021918,0.0005482038,0.0037863473,0.000095701034,0.00020395455,0.9744435,0.01872044,0.0019658266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052336276,0.00005238122,0.0011753129,0.00057502114,0.000044732176,0.00095538417,0.0065688617,0.00044939236,0.001967983,0.39488748,0.5931485,0.00012259358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09085552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10199106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90914446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011019343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012242146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18065333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410002467","doi":"10.21991/cf29491","title":"“We do not really know why this approach was taken”: Explaining and Modifying the Supreme Court’s Approach to the Indirect Horizontal Effect of Charter Rights","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02154921779442441,"score_gpt":0.27536276577393937,"score_spread":0.25381354797951494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410002467","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022479886,0.0014112545,0.012619479,0.83212316,0.004062582,0.00007831234,0.00010702119,0.00012485644,0.12699337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63637763,0.0010613942,0.009170171,0.30951446,0.0021632256,0.00024327284,0.000044475142,0.00017581471,0.041249484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98984724,0.0045668427,0.0003645768,0.0011511142,0.002326236,0.0017438995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99108934,0.006209265,0.00042326975,0.0004488945,0.0014306862,0.00039855056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008590423,0.00045898597,0.00038376616,0.0010286395,0.011153156,0.01395085,0.0033579331,0.019619284,0.0037619148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029042337,0.00052573765,0.000897362,0.0008545854,0.024553668,0.009101485,0.003888277,0.02646311,0.00063534017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009083593,0.000009793039,0.000335143,0.000028933277,0.0000064075407,0.00027190996,0.01095457,0.00017234204,0.00029930184,0.92842215,0.056309443,0.0031810147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003690056,0.00004891562,0.0018095605,0.0005041269,0.00004668776,0.0003094716,0.022644626,0.0018741556,0.0028523004,0.3798431,0.5898382,0.00019206751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060975548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07554787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060975548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01023886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008795772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12124127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410307168","doi":"10.1177/00219096251339092","title":"Legal Pluralism and Child Identity: The Interplay of Igbo Worldview and English Traditions in <i>Chinweze &amp; Anor v Masi &amp; Anor</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Asian and African Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Igbo; Sociology; Identity (music); Gender studies; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.018939784391391046,"score_gpt":0.3373833903494517,"score_spread":0.31844360595806065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410307168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9179281,0.0020475697,0.00027006792,0.0064612883,0.00003416882,0.0000148548115,0.00002394156,0.0000018486029,0.07321818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982083,0.0004506392,0.00007504593,0.00011737764,0.000004938777,0.0000056806985,0.0000037477648,0.0000013940546,0.0011328479],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992207,0.00047859456,0.000025459924,0.000048220816,0.00009155836,0.00013540924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985623,0.0009313869,0.00026822966,0.000046072466,0.00008437228,0.00010774462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00208816,0.00012446831,0.00019298229,0.0006084017,0.0048888843,0.004350981,0.00036159833,0.00055010774,0.0027821367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002251425,0.00011815917,0.000062699975,0.00088472903,0.011080596,0.0022337842,0.0030952294,0.0014405842,0.000091353206],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019623005,0.000033138323,0.017899167,0.000053438973,0.0000031270706,0.00062402,0.816392,0.000017416267,0.0002835332,0.15883817,0.00065110007,0.0051852856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050572767,0.000018300834,0.034981653,0.0002585804,0.0000065607,0.000341746,0.9164462,0.000065140375,0.00023874582,0.010857543,0.036770094,0.000010374443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024252146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049691025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024252146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031934467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018976163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048221946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410444879","doi":"10.17159//1727-3781/2025/v28i0a20220","title":"The Judiciary's Contribution to Preventing Protected Area Downgrading, Downsizing, and Degazettement: Mining and Environmental Justice Community of South Africa v MEC for Agriculture, Rural Development Land and Environmental Affairs (1322/2021) [2024] ZAMPMBHC 48 (18 July 2024)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Environmental justice; Environmental planning; Economic Justice; Political science; Geography; Environmental protection; Law","score_opus":0.010362434990230969,"score_gpt":0.2489336477855339,"score_spread":0.23857121279530294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410444879","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043688085,0.009824843,0.0018044536,0.7325315,0.007723335,0.0006894065,0.00029446514,0.00011793375,0.2033259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30427969,0.0042680595,0.0019676008,0.58032167,0.0026424278,0.00090483174,0.000118343705,0.00008566966,0.10541172],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920447,0.0016774185,0.00050712883,0.00076998386,0.0015422605,0.0034585146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99246323,0.0039408165,0.0007613104,0.0002707635,0.0006930276,0.0018707528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076885535,0.0007672606,0.00056825735,0.00087673205,0.018050112,0.012285767,0.0030770192,0.03647717,0.005783385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022064103,0.0011491331,0.0007183891,0.00091746723,0.0081754895,0.0048497617,0.007137637,0.032670897,0.00082501967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009037436,0.0002196253,0.0083402395,0.00037295587,0.00008287643,0.0068045477,0.029059565,0.00073443673,0.0024676844,0.33516622,0.5828885,0.03377298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015205615,0.00012503719,0.01843604,0.0012378115,0.00010358416,0.0012504965,0.014245094,0.00082289876,0.0013505877,0.02830462,0.9337405,0.00023133494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15920515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3437719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15920515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009776837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043413635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31655693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410603649","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v18n3p1","title":"Procedural Exclusivity in Ghana: The Legacy of O&amp;#39;Reilly v. Mackman","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Ghana","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.020652261662847005,"score_gpt":0.3365854009939209,"score_spread":0.3159331393310739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410603649","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29007062,0.038238764,0.011801916,0.27707854,0.0015480934,0.00015502615,0.00009992796,0.00007643053,0.3809307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9437498,0.0074087135,0.0029688315,0.030579455,0.00049231574,0.000073364696,0.000020960246,0.00006268228,0.0146437995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944991,0.002595471,0.0002605417,0.00063026056,0.0012299098,0.000784645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99124473,0.0057353843,0.001692517,0.00050140714,0.0005780814,0.00024788856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075832745,0.00023887126,0.0003433748,0.00085590186,0.00608049,0.0053444346,0.0013635688,0.0039819144,0.0017521256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015037629,0.0003405821,0.00030702862,0.001240422,0.030865468,0.00501447,0.0036589857,0.008144476,0.00015649931],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022625532,0.000009622392,0.0013264384,0.00012340282,0.0000054595594,0.0010378412,0.022380318,0.00017356708,0.000508801,0.9472043,0.0052399,0.021967819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004994165,0.00009743779,0.012918946,0.0021023846,0.000048376034,0.0016375182,0.020932715,0.0004053838,0.0016898854,0.19688173,0.7631217,0.00011392968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06625488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09889943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06625488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012577893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0099653285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13173848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411625495","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v18n3p20","title":"Reforming the Constitution in a Developing Country: How Mismanaging Constitutional Reforms Led to Electoral Loss in Botswana","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Development economics; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.015959542227229586,"score_gpt":0.31688058072883685,"score_spread":0.3009210385016073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411625495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97387683,0.00040404886,0.0002790585,0.0080304565,0.000033940047,0.000035472454,0.000021545604,0.0000044762833,0.017314188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965043,0.0002092298,0.00011263713,0.0005521773,0.0000045932784,0.000016117185,0.000011433514,0.0000043963,0.0025852171],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820566,0.00074011483,0.000042292606,0.00010074093,0.00014154546,0.0007695716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739033,0.0013126035,0.0004784168,0.00013746813,0.00031247892,0.0003687454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003539211,0.00015732642,0.00021072246,0.0011562951,0.0106378365,0.005170904,0.00080240355,0.0013543564,0.003910915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008104015,0.00021717823,0.00018297047,0.0019140089,0.007001567,0.0027977217,0.0036233221,0.0035627596,0.0002260172],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000537434,0.0004144379,0.17227891,0.00041859676,0.00007958262,0.018458333,0.36235055,0.002602928,0.0070971325,0.34051108,0.008233798,0.08701727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012437621,0.00036275975,0.176101,0.0004912295,0.000109692555,0.0016015773,0.6188618,0.0023136246,0.003381246,0.03758585,0.1589988,0.00006799666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06767414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11049897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06767414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0107879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008621113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13456047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411694090","doi":"10.1080/01419870.2025.2520414","title":"Carceral apartheid: how lies and white supremacists run our prisons","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnic and Racial Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); Prison; Criminology; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.061986835306394275,"score_gpt":0.4144539717605644,"score_spread":0.35246713645417016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411694090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6010684,0.013001959,0.0011086446,0.2199114,0.001760072,0.000036291443,0.00013740598,0.000021383079,0.16295438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9667203,0.0028438806,0.00022313657,0.011690033,0.00012054719,0.000027133117,0.00002206437,0.00003179864,0.018321114],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975132,0.0014546895,0.000036181762,0.00014648499,0.0002074832,0.00064204325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853694,0.0007555126,0.00017197413,0.00007238721,0.00018550467,0.00027770427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031578494,0.0003078804,0.00024774327,0.00076723023,0.017810827,0.0049667014,0.00066154456,0.0017131626,0.004584047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064233686,0.00021371346,0.00016527208,0.0008306037,0.01681918,0.005038494,0.0042224736,0.0056962282,0.0003044841],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047803234,0.000029294551,0.0036693441,0.00006863044,0.000014538342,0.00038265513,0.72752416,0.00007147164,0.00032088175,0.21466576,0.031872686,0.021332836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014982308,0.000042147345,0.012958332,0.00061020645,0.000019664894,0.00020377016,0.65693915,0.00008950411,0.000647008,0.029471911,0.29895154,0.00005176456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10582884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28324467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10582884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005935052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057086702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21042567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412154862","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-82411-1_11","title":"Reflections on the Future of Legal Segmentation: Three Frontiers of Investigation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Global dynamics of social policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Segmentation; Political science; Cartography; Computer science; Geography; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02158115838513291,"score_gpt":0.34491192270554116,"score_spread":0.32333076432040825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412154862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030390264,0.037010007,0.017525226,0.39971516,0.001527534,0.00010896375,0.000086417436,0.000054257598,0.51358217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89951134,0.019907326,0.008350687,0.026613096,0.0017659684,0.00037640176,0.0000844886,0.00007719872,0.04331353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919337,0.0051513277,0.00017925249,0.0004397338,0.0013775986,0.0009184027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794805,0.017463824,0.00050915545,0.00071985595,0.0011801122,0.0006464863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018067349,0.00043414647,0.000779463,0.0031757953,0.0076543847,0.018472053,0.0022418352,0.00867709,0.0079485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01303847,0.00035883562,0.0006567019,0.0038251905,0.090945624,0.022528892,0.009957771,0.009937685,0.0005954601],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013088419,0.000004056198,0.000020863466,0.000013819993,2.0020582e-7,0.000023696324,0.0029804136,0.0000510226,0.00001332133,0.9945862,0.00096026284,0.0013447582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039208194,0.00000673201,0.00016503733,0.00037190923,0.0000010791986,0.000042995693,0.02012102,0.00040960804,0.00008921081,0.8950705,0.08370752,0.0000104368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009363225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009137554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018472053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017230887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014681026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12501937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412372703","doi":"10.5430/jct.v14n3p149","title":"Interrogating the Disconnect: A Limpopo Province Case Study of Mainstream Educators’ Engagement with Inclusive Education Policies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Curriculum and Teaching","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Political science; Mainstreaming; Pedagogy; Sociology; Economic growth; Special education; Economics","score_opus":0.010436289053292927,"score_gpt":0.3549087171550855,"score_spread":0.34447242810179257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412372703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850739,0.0005278717,0.00059656386,0.0039305575,0.00003074644,0.00008721753,0.000025708214,0.0000065328295,0.009720804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971348,0.00048468367,0.00034386743,0.00048784897,0.000008618209,0.000050686725,0.000013119586,0.000007231531,0.0014690494],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938175,0.0034816805,0.00015135879,0.00029685724,0.0004919159,0.001760589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925982,0.004796014,0.0006615127,0.00024901133,0.00048639206,0.0012088479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060502053,0.00051355053,0.00057785236,0.0023182197,0.024224037,0.006017809,0.0020774947,0.0024092074,0.002595285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0106040845,0.00069978554,0.00027803468,0.0036294558,0.013500517,0.005311129,0.008686011,0.00349462,0.00021272543],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027719929,0.000061894505,0.0067829075,0.00012048638,0.0000042355628,0.009314343,0.9748061,0.000064926164,0.00029418824,0.0037531774,0.00038241464,0.0043875473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029920147,0.00002144091,0.0023165273,0.00011826897,0.0000036706474,0.0005792715,0.9886231,0.000054428296,0.000088909175,0.00036357957,0.00782174,0.0000060168964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12114426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20721646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12114426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017652862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014677722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24087822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412847133","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340118","title":"The Appointment of Commissioners of the Independent Electoral Commission in Botswana","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; International law; Law; Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.022845490107340896,"score_gpt":0.36870934968682767,"score_spread":0.3458638595794868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412847133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95517844,0.0003235258,0.0002953984,0.005442816,0.000112227455,0.00008511653,0.000038399874,0.000006462637,0.03851761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99200624,0.00011419335,0.000120933335,0.0004972546,0.000011645122,0.000017753491,0.000009687523,0.0000032282028,0.007219094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99692386,0.0009171912,0.00008695257,0.00025471082,0.0002602165,0.0015569589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940101,0.0031334846,0.0010093894,0.00028681522,0.00057629554,0.0009841074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045367368,0.00015069064,0.00022545653,0.001563455,0.013846163,0.0042694686,0.0010602999,0.0022126052,0.0069305273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010376723,0.0005320703,0.00013729546,0.0017171443,0.0035799933,0.0014194692,0.0030326797,0.0031526515,0.00037716283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005618449,0.0003842447,0.17178912,0.0004036938,0.000048936257,0.059459265,0.30816284,0.00057112717,0.01352801,0.33622342,0.028632421,0.08023513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009952609,0.00036872606,0.20633386,0.0009506854,0.000099235214,0.005924713,0.5145375,0.0014924465,0.0052324445,0.011653481,0.25318018,0.00012724094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09575056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26074025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09575056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011315541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012612585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19038647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413254496","doi":"10.1080/23323256.2025.2469679","title":"Post-pandemic women-led vigilantism: implications for gender, power and popular justice in the rural Eastern Cape","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Southern Africa","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Cape; Economic Justice; Power (physics); Pandemic; Political science; Criminology; Gender studies; Sociology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Socioeconomics; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.028697583394611807,"score_gpt":0.35488879723906824,"score_spread":0.32619121384445643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413254496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9628618,0.0008396334,0.00021803443,0.009014617,0.000058658046,0.00003832264,0.000038907427,0.000004479667,0.026925495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99638593,0.00026558782,0.00006566968,0.0002570395,0.00001092434,0.000012006751,0.000005477185,0.000003442555,0.0029939774],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928457,0.00026499125,0.000016794955,0.00005564911,0.00005462363,0.0003233164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988288,0.00050302537,0.0002877849,0.0000440918,0.00007643313,0.00025977485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013448994,0.00022667804,0.00018487991,0.00088186865,0.008047381,0.0030841187,0.000690476,0.00082688266,0.007707855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037577834,0.00020447707,0.0001290006,0.0009220321,0.0103375595,0.0024239928,0.0032719995,0.0015395186,0.00016293405],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041309995,0.00003650451,0.015467903,0.00010770084,0.000006856038,0.0034550652,0.9499067,0.000055885386,0.001283546,0.020091685,0.0011411549,0.008405756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000081731405,0.000055628418,0.03914207,0.00024963994,0.000005365912,0.00043865942,0.91971004,0.000054069013,0.00025489723,0.0028965303,0.037170313,0.000014633671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.092117906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16239175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092117906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073883887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004818196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18316346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413295264","doi":"10.51363/unifr.diff.2025.50","title":"Contentious Status of the Banadir Regional Administration","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"IFF working paper online","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Università di Macerata","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Political science; Regional science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.08777951208073798,"score_gpt":0.38182387220633257,"score_spread":0.2940443601255946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413295264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29417276,0.005888306,0.0033830793,0.04866892,0.000597737,0.00015942974,0.00044436587,0.000092310634,0.64659303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95041984,0.0011323714,0.0014553233,0.003364587,0.00014819636,0.000095735966,0.0001289987,0.000033850527,0.043221008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99221474,0.0035144617,0.00049589446,0.0006827125,0.0016732591,0.0014189259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947684,0.0025014137,0.0005136947,0.00068737427,0.0012418923,0.00028716328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010315838,0.00017994408,0.00033095884,0.001115249,0.005298506,0.009873565,0.0010434431,0.0027259574,0.0063404352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013940981,0.000305695,0.00018828025,0.0013141299,0.0070352177,0.0028915051,0.0037458583,0.0033346876,0.0007618012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044961103,0.000025580102,0.0027483911,0.00013569712,0.000011700384,0.00035980446,0.018491242,0.00017754672,0.0017510093,0.951393,0.008142799,0.016718213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024566723,0.00007305487,0.015898855,0.0006665451,0.000060778297,0.00040439266,0.022674358,0.0004226546,0.0031162798,0.07362487,0.88296074,0.00007290697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01616592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022532823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01616592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008641384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01396356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06269789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413515758","doi":"10.64628/aam.yapqw77kt","title":"Wet'suwet'en: Why are Indigenous rights being defined by an energy corporation?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Corporation; Political science; Energy (signal processing); Business; Law; Physics; Ecology","score_opus":0.018042524420948666,"score_gpt":0.2679641409730237,"score_spread":0.249921616552075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413515758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2636458,0.0058602337,0.0020774973,0.22305891,0.0006911189,0.000047422123,0.000079832476,0.000017584347,0.50452155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9484423,0.0013310434,0.0005880234,0.013851893,0.00011462456,0.000048452217,0.0000124335465,0.000019764677,0.035591315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675685,0.0012693785,0.000121238714,0.00022532328,0.0005182139,0.0011090263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942753,0.0037740802,0.0004933372,0.00030375298,0.00065785047,0.00049577735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043809367,0.00014526614,0.00025971775,0.00046015982,0.011290133,0.006410293,0.0008506443,0.0046488284,0.008376824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009172772,0.0001898296,0.00018048227,0.0009841477,0.020729005,0.007539776,0.0034761075,0.0064133825,0.00035155623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009263922,0.000012550737,0.0008842294,0.000052432417,0.0000032848106,0.00026477218,0.07784541,0.000017719929,0.00026101954,0.91127676,0.004551521,0.004821044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002408033,0.000027390955,0.01240427,0.0010840821,0.000024605013,0.0005415153,0.32792383,0.00013077067,0.0009560628,0.23500973,0.42182493,0.000048763388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062091373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.101552285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93790865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004552216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0091311885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.123459935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413525533","doi":"10.64628/aam.64pha3tx5","title":"Are We Dating The Same Guy? Online groups toe the line between protecting women and defaming men","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Line (geometry); Psychology; Computer security; Internet privacy; Computer science; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.08829303166513598,"score_gpt":0.35662887062926063,"score_spread":0.26833583896412466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413525533","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30914488,0.009341702,0.0023248577,0.43735415,0.0016521184,0.00010702956,0.00012336743,0.000043744792,0.23990825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9267249,0.0036268372,0.0008609342,0.02727599,0.00035387604,0.00006504479,0.00002765031,0.0000432714,0.041021656],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99599177,0.002443871,0.00008328681,0.000131919,0.0003276587,0.0010214789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902291,0.0051607294,0.0011446817,0.00044933826,0.00050240324,0.002513749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004896822,0.00028815828,0.00021693256,0.0009514413,0.0142249,0.0052873543,0.0007633621,0.0036273357,0.032804534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011938893,0.00027178356,0.0001688935,0.0012885224,0.008924875,0.009223948,0.005206621,0.0046416786,0.001508853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000839139,0.00026107428,0.02347979,0.0005332765,0.000023745013,0.0021182348,0.48911,0.000085913605,0.0017857238,0.2964506,0.06713072,0.11893709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023144588,0.00009200694,0.013533855,0.001068527,0.000020101024,0.00085876085,0.5988989,0.000057145793,0.0006581309,0.02605795,0.3587058,0.000025646737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019312019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030168626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032804534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021771227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008207585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109742045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413602748","doi":"10.64628/aam.e7wrcrqj4","title":"Police violations of Charter rights highlight the need for accountability and transparency","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Charter; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.0758745830195794,"score_gpt":0.3763282472076923,"score_spread":0.3004536641881129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413602748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48034248,0.0044748373,0.011445062,0.30805588,0.0008595301,0.00012737077,0.00030816864,0.000059798054,0.19432686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907199,0.0009750052,0.0007779698,0.0029582856,0.00010048683,0.000024381838,0.000019709983,0.000027307717,0.004396894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991189,0.005031673,0.00029728477,0.0005123032,0.0012889579,0.0016807751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94057935,0.04477537,0.008089731,0.0016450293,0.0035111518,0.0013993734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011794393,0.00028709677,0.00040860247,0.0027163983,0.0076512303,0.009325762,0.00088779983,0.0034812351,0.012394777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06718975,0.00037615956,0.00020879967,0.0050459886,0.010432698,0.011302249,0.0040046424,0.0065039396,0.0004816614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011636843,0.000067679954,0.019955404,0.00046318388,0.000035467896,0.0019052142,0.15821183,0.00081457145,0.0009024347,0.74737495,0.02846574,0.04168717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038684386,0.00006678506,0.06054582,0.0019993489,0.00006100551,0.00069879333,0.36011955,0.0028090423,0.0020247367,0.36210063,0.20943512,0.00010046874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060605984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.074038185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060605984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008622141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014205789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120506406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414654018","doi":"10.38159/ehass.202561026","title":"Exploring Automatically Unfair Dismissals due to “Agreed” or “ Normal” Retirement Age in South Africa","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"E-Journal of Humanities Arts and Social Sciences","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Mandatory retirement; Labour law; Retirement age; Age discrimination; Scholarship; Legislation","score_opus":0.221081386833867,"score_gpt":0.35437968640747863,"score_spread":0.13329829957361164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414654018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9769841,0.0006156042,0.0005924394,0.0031937782,0.000037034417,0.00004710223,0.000034591314,0.0000014942044,0.018493922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981541,0.00022961863,0.0001259157,0.0003380276,0.000010652205,0.0000203231,0.000007553479,0.0000019610732,0.0011117194],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926467,0.003624534,0.00043160026,0.0005647169,0.0013561446,0.0013763714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.978281,0.013859798,0.0049291244,0.0006807895,0.0017653471,0.00048395793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013482519,0.00017367856,0.00028793968,0.0027479057,0.007573047,0.004102685,0.0009608612,0.0015546452,0.0043853167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04011603,0.00022612282,0.0002375003,0.0018285757,0.00797067,0.004186343,0.0046837335,0.0022158276,0.00019808993],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016385163,0.00014897976,0.10695981,0.00040476472,0.000027711736,0.0024453925,0.67768246,0.00027658007,0.0014317826,0.17537741,0.0017761348,0.033305217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019314708,0.00009777046,0.1331169,0.0011799017,0.000042358944,0.0006177657,0.82167536,0.0005382142,0.00083686743,0.011875454,0.029960224,0.000039843122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04589072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08739839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04589072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009669303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009058855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0912472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414736529","doi":"10.36475/11.3.2","title":"The Global Implications of South Africa’s Transformative Constitutionalism on Private Law Systems","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and World","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Transformative learning; Private law; Argument (complex analysis); Mandate; Private sphere; Politics; Normative; Public law","score_opus":0.020269145321503604,"score_gpt":0.30819381834833914,"score_spread":0.28792467302683555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414736529","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42067024,0.006409724,0.0069715613,0.07986213,0.00016533252,0.00004708827,0.000080152044,0.000026958538,0.4857668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99670404,0.00074951164,0.0003355518,0.00056491676,0.000018435549,0.000010397001,0.0000058455084,0.000006989488,0.0016043684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975279,0.0013616707,0.000045840716,0.000212908,0.00024777098,0.00060392683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99743974,0.00154199,0.00028896242,0.00035898766,0.00019431775,0.00017609187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004486342,0.0002613951,0.0002581836,0.0014694682,0.0060426425,0.005915512,0.00045405226,0.0012766977,0.004342899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004398093,0.0002035657,0.00025143262,0.0016517492,0.02965328,0.0067795655,0.0066805594,0.0032918577,0.0001374364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009943765,0.000004218051,0.0005070747,0.000035071953,0.000003371073,0.0003034905,0.02552789,0.00026195945,0.00024543845,0.9676682,0.00048651043,0.004946743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026951764,0.000047263176,0.009910496,0.0005477341,0.00002409544,0.00084950693,0.09284852,0.00073519466,0.0013216194,0.6182503,0.27539733,0.000041108524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012429848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0134461755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012429848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00951097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054176473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06900722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415256078","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5612191","title":"Arbitrary Detention Powers and Section 1 of the Charter: Two Critical Blind Spots in &lt;i&gt;Luamba&lt;/i&gt;","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Blind spot; Power (physics); Feature (linguistics)","score_opus":0.012514497836076057,"score_gpt":0.3101200581526644,"score_spread":0.29760556031658836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415256078","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085102424,0.0024996544,0.02987552,0.1602728,0.0022498337,0.0002260706,0.00030128332,0.00013524483,0.7193371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9357206,0.00052539364,0.0041682473,0.016089393,0.00083037955,0.00026119858,0.000031194322,0.00012625547,0.0422474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.988841,0.0048918733,0.00030724742,0.0013441183,0.001812224,0.0028036158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97921294,0.015856335,0.0013440942,0.0017293309,0.0011499141,0.00070735667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01513217,0.00063122297,0.001333151,0.00131968,0.012327957,0.010650857,0.0029136657,0.019967802,0.01614226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042975698,0.0008947972,0.0010622942,0.0014789293,0.03307707,0.016837636,0.005570305,0.024840502,0.0012120088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011472892,0.0000058362216,0.00003251745,0.0000066415832,0.0000011336151,0.000032637217,0.00045867433,0.00004592891,0.00001747406,0.9955629,0.0030826393,0.0007421555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035570436,0.000010004935,0.00016479162,0.000065328284,0.000008799357,0.00003771051,0.0006282032,0.00032111883,0.00020871004,0.98675805,0.011735318,0.000026265641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015110035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018422442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019967802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008327828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0096726185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08002752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415300917","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2025/v28i0a20220","title":"The Judiciary's Contribution to Preventing Protected Area Downgrading, Downsizing, and Degazettement: Mining and Environmental Justice Community of South Africa v MEC for Agriculture, Rural Development Land and Environmental Affairs (1322/2021) [2024] ZAMPMBHC 48 (18 July 2024)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Set-aside; Situated; Protected area; Convention on Biological Diversity; Environmental justice; Marine protected area; Rural area; Biodiversity; Convention","score_opus":0.010362434990230969,"score_gpt":0.2489336477855339,"score_spread":0.23857121279530294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415300917","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043688085,0.009824843,0.0018044536,0.7325315,0.007723335,0.0006894065,0.00029446514,0.00011793375,0.2033259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30427969,0.0042680595,0.0019676008,0.58032167,0.0026424278,0.00090483174,0.000118343705,0.00008566966,0.10541172],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920447,0.0016774185,0.00050712883,0.00076998386,0.0015422605,0.0034585146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99246323,0.0039408165,0.0007613104,0.0002707635,0.0006930276,0.0018707528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076885535,0.0007672606,0.00056825735,0.00087673205,0.018050112,0.012285767,0.0030770192,0.03647717,0.005783385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022064103,0.0011491331,0.0007183891,0.00091746723,0.0081754895,0.0048497617,0.007137637,0.032670897,0.00082501967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009037436,0.0002196253,0.0083402395,0.00037295587,0.00008287643,0.0068045477,0.029059565,0.00073443673,0.0024676844,0.33516622,0.5828885,0.03377298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015205615,0.00012503719,0.01843604,0.0012378115,0.00010358416,0.0012504965,0.014245094,0.00082289876,0.0013505877,0.02830462,0.9337405,0.00023133494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15920515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3437719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15920515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009776837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043413635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31655693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415406449","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340124","title":"The Persistence of Property Grabbing in the South African Customary Law of Succession","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Legislature; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Estate; Vulnerability (computing); Law reform; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Common law","score_opus":0.04659250560921592,"score_gpt":0.3277579227932704,"score_spread":0.28116541718405447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415406449","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97440684,0.0007599119,0.00023802229,0.0037311364,0.000018824812,0.000018310408,0.000025739451,0.0000033066108,0.020797912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99930894,0.00012410959,0.000019697494,0.00008774113,0.0000039940905,0.0000029293717,0.0000038378794,0.0000011938644,0.00044741662],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99686193,0.00084923115,0.00017434108,0.0003374434,0.0006655493,0.001111505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98941106,0.004237249,0.004165295,0.00062831223,0.00086774956,0.0006903599],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046104975,0.00010239159,0.000248029,0.0023232033,0.0057991417,0.0043592704,0.00081259344,0.0008989392,0.0051615546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018118702,0.00025036428,0.000113906135,0.0027902965,0.015303414,0.0042226417,0.005357164,0.0024298746,0.0001542364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012466207,0.000102189166,0.19078693,0.00032487966,0.000029994804,0.007685494,0.5256798,0.0005237594,0.0022740832,0.22105391,0.0029235613,0.048490744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007935781,0.00009403526,0.3127695,0.00096490665,0.000014065616,0.001708697,0.6194736,0.00047451133,0.0008862346,0.0173273,0.046227243,0.00005200118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035733905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06506391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035733905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060444525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052912757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071051836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416193743","doi":"10.18357/anthropologica67120252751","title":"Rights and Responsibilities in Rural South Africa: Gender, Personhood, and the Crisis of Meaning, by Kathleen Rice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropologica","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Land rights; Rural development","score_opus":0.022329235214345277,"score_gpt":0.3150123787860534,"score_spread":0.29268314357170816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416193743","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016910894,0.6001999,0.00034977318,0.35253614,0.0019454848,0.00004064192,0.00011007383,0.000019327634,0.027887817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3373033,0.5928029,0.0010591072,0.022919254,0.0013537426,0.0001542063,0.00011174913,0.00006504533,0.044230655],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987244,0.0007596393,0.000044280434,0.00008178072,0.00018637159,0.0002035162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982235,0.0011481019,0.00013996472,0.000037177928,0.0001635113,0.00028776165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029901438,0.0010397226,0.0006175817,0.001686009,0.009997974,0.0063953134,0.001070489,0.0031545192,0.005370736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003590551,0.00073342014,0.0003129307,0.0057458594,0.014869046,0.010322165,0.0050020684,0.004510844,0.0005169104],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006983599,0.000104027444,0.004698255,0.0014874615,0.000031154883,0.0013586556,0.48672184,0.00028744407,0.0006027575,0.1156528,0.3038593,0.085126504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021352307,0.000023922255,0.009142552,0.0023155008,0.00001558784,0.00070787116,0.39697248,0.00011124919,0.00013137003,0.030994639,0.5595301,0.00003343149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2191196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38087344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2191196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007395827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015160609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43568838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416611325","doi":"10.2989/1814232x.2025.2570313","title":"Comparing seismic survey mitigation regulations: lessons for South Africa from international frameworks","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Marine Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Seismic survey; Survey data collection; Disaster mitigation","score_opus":0.04446905463044103,"score_gpt":0.3494937877881412,"score_spread":0.3050247331577002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416611325","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4233658,0.02972083,0.020844148,0.27427936,0.0016802282,0.0008163456,0.00092995656,0.00009442626,0.24826896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94920623,0.010681614,0.011485761,0.018702157,0.00020994648,0.00040128204,0.00024508202,0.000091727044,0.0089763375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99044716,0.0041155745,0.0008858683,0.0005977417,0.0015955601,0.0023580512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96879065,0.01809089,0.0041396995,0.0016046513,0.0056582177,0.001715911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023836982,0.00061881694,0.00045189177,0.004204521,0.0033912302,0.00603517,0.0015310629,0.0024066027,0.0066021383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053029727,0.00036769785,0.00075833395,0.0039230343,0.0043726233,0.0077036764,0.006172615,0.0041209655,0.00033520086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032671395,0.00031350274,0.06917321,0.0031661354,0.00022329668,0.0035350989,0.064161934,0.0029874456,0.0040758955,0.5318197,0.02068564,0.29953137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012448078,0.00043377595,0.19400309,0.013116418,0.0003934631,0.001145559,0.17149754,0.0019254291,0.0039830543,0.089377746,0.5237482,0.0002512632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056172602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.064645745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056172602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007923842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026894553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12606353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416871784","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5818782","title":"(Mis)recognition of Customary Marriages: A Comparative Analysis of Canadian and South African Family Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Injustice; Statutory law; Economic Justice; Interpretation (philosophy)","score_opus":0.03326763832415882,"score_gpt":0.30758279631752816,"score_spread":0.27431515799336936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416871784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90928906,0.0018865591,0.00021555086,0.005599221,0.00003702451,0.000049906906,0.00038910375,0.000008606802,0.082524925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943895,0.0007209273,0.000084394575,0.00030391596,0.000005889154,0.000009038726,0.00006083985,0.00000452168,0.0044209454],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99567777,0.00046885567,0.000098828066,0.00024626573,0.0014867646,0.0020215372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856645,0.0043404135,0.0020114323,0.0005010259,0.005702534,0.0017800989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029886346,0.0001516427,0.00033667727,0.005302307,0.017341156,0.0054219323,0.0022700906,0.0017878389,0.009270755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024001725,0.00026660773,0.00024819057,0.0107139805,0.0071969624,0.0016865877,0.0025144408,0.002295554,0.00024254298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023102501,0.00017240892,0.22659479,0.000263808,0.000058661808,0.0019255857,0.3575462,0.0006896416,0.0010614453,0.31797603,0.014910333,0.07857013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017997341,0.000038286278,0.6641504,0.00038851,0.00006505955,0.0005809294,0.27449855,0.0005705414,0.0005168953,0.004945115,0.054149386,0.00007825901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.987028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064653866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.064653866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0941715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4690988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417005967","doi":"10.17159/r3n3gv92","title":"What the Doctor Ordered: Lessons From Abroad to Strengthen South Africa’s Medical-Parole System","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Dignity; Legislation; Imprisonment; Criminal Conviction; Sentence; Value (mathematics)","score_opus":0.028892530347944798,"score_gpt":0.3352269723553151,"score_spread":0.3063344420073703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417005967","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07002363,0.021207266,0.0021868295,0.78249705,0.0029095754,0.00011813976,0.00007105926,0.000042936663,0.12094352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79673505,0.019341756,0.0039342325,0.14232345,0.0010563346,0.00017375922,0.0000739055,0.00012924109,0.036232308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99446636,0.002754731,0.00016613913,0.00025165692,0.00033736238,0.0020237477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826317,0.008897017,0.0005637053,0.0008608284,0.0015403475,0.0055064363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014563371,0.00038611935,0.00049351,0.00093817234,0.008950593,0.007373769,0.0017658047,0.005268986,0.014400997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019462029,0.00034198034,0.00055817235,0.00092016364,0.010383908,0.009444013,0.009773612,0.01379859,0.0011171795],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038850014,0.00039193817,0.008818209,0.0012382787,0.00005563904,0.005709267,0.079652816,0.0009602673,0.001337668,0.65198874,0.06592763,0.18353099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021599335,0.0003663939,0.0121668065,0.0059035816,0.000057525132,0.001176757,0.12517484,0.00042694883,0.0011564324,0.14962912,0.7035818,0.00014385447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061728384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.091212705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061728384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011029876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045742895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12273818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417400764","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340125","title":"Beyond Bhe – Examining the Impact of Bhe v Magistrate Khayelitsha on the Customary Law of Succession and Gender Equality","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Magistrate; Legislature; Customary international law; Human rights; Commission; Rule of law; Ecological succession; International law; Family law","score_opus":0.09636516097035498,"score_gpt":0.4068332502368066,"score_spread":0.31046808926645164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417400764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8033903,0.0030852344,0.00032413017,0.047113553,0.0003512345,0.00006572011,0.000114354436,0.0000044208714,0.14555112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866881,0.0007020269,0.00006136126,0.0055973614,0.00008209079,0.00002622456,0.000015250912,0.000004626253,0.006823034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960672,0.0015089917,0.000064881235,0.00023370919,0.0005293474,0.0015959673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994273,0.0037270053,0.0007730068,0.0001337217,0.0005169199,0.0005762971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052037816,0.00015365731,0.00040977658,0.001023431,0.011317543,0.0054885745,0.00117715,0.0027941281,0.011096528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009074462,0.00025882586,0.00029646966,0.001122377,0.011233052,0.004996473,0.0063934955,0.005442898,0.00043492767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017431984,0.0005000726,0.051534507,0.0004817318,0.000058451453,0.005282553,0.36414564,0.0003568644,0.00097292685,0.5090687,0.02131574,0.04610848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031188247,0.0003340463,0.1259227,0.0014032009,0.00006660648,0.00067596143,0.62946874,0.0002939034,0.0011422492,0.037422564,0.20315725,0.00008166339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05805478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11466205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05805478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009074694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007789697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11543369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417401061","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340126","title":"The Continued Struggle of Customary Law Wives for Recognition of Their Inheritance Rights in South Africa","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Legislature; Context (archaeology); Jurisprudence; Law reform; Customary international law; Family law; Magistrate","score_opus":0.03940335552585601,"score_gpt":0.3155829949943145,"score_spread":0.2761796394684585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417401061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9636001,0.0011412996,0.0003454282,0.01428079,0.000073967494,0.00003871783,0.00001169943,0.000003863552,0.020504203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964749,0.0004325155,0.000099782985,0.00073804386,0.000007993894,0.000011050178,0.0000022850093,0.000002818012,0.0022306005],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728894,0.0012529118,0.00010358558,0.0001698459,0.00031024934,0.0008744987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997247,0.0014686396,0.00047902824,0.00011463624,0.00019722169,0.0004935193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005882516,0.00018209485,0.0002926761,0.0007947607,0.012708772,0.0040481985,0.0007993018,0.0014648248,0.005233395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008190032,0.00047801397,0.000119654695,0.0007535481,0.009715842,0.0028983722,0.0059763263,0.0029169673,0.0002204703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029887788,0.00006335045,0.011430798,0.00009994008,0.0000079883275,0.0037750173,0.8793933,0.00003831389,0.002280326,0.0774597,0.0016737981,0.023747532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000095766345,0.00006718174,0.017481329,0.00040038503,0.000008382344,0.00097326835,0.91830957,0.00009911789,0.00084521255,0.0060013304,0.055782076,0.000022664404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027918238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06064973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027918238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048589436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066102557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055511475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417525542","doi":"10.20355/jcie29698","title":"Translating the Universal Declaration of Human Rights into Practice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Contemporary Issues in Education","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Declaration; Rhetoric; Human security; National security; Bologna declaration; International human rights law; Public policy; Security studies","score_opus":0.027962659524911893,"score_gpt":0.3990730451958557,"score_spread":0.3711103856709438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417525542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05651419,0.016362522,0.08092258,0.40158474,0.00592933,0.0010890906,0.0004911414,0.00025531865,0.4368511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8783121,0.009992037,0.060999405,0.028059445,0.00077151344,0.0014953148,0.00034700893,0.00027880052,0.019744331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8889673,0.08117257,0.0063318764,0.0039774515,0.014835277,0.0047155092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81498617,0.14983603,0.005680888,0.013539433,0.013512215,0.0024453208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12816292,0.00079194765,0.00093011797,0.0040176916,0.007987277,0.014466447,0.002499765,0.0065332153,0.0044152015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13867344,0.0010715649,0.00060650014,0.003654542,0.050835546,0.019541293,0.016237075,0.012314384,0.0013074315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018583618,0.000052405085,0.0006797804,0.00050967507,0.000006935488,0.00036814538,0.18029779,0.0004103891,0.0005621588,0.7646203,0.013488442,0.03898543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024756198,0.0000887898,0.0015996285,0.006168238,0.000010817935,0.00022751593,0.13880648,0.0005294704,0.0011339772,0.35748842,0.4938647,0.000057078516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011948178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073504145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12816292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019442797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05466725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6777984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W45096477","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511835186","title":"Legal Aspects of Economic Integration in Africa","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; State (computer science); Situated; Economic integration; Political science; Economic community; Political economy; Law and economics; Economic system; Law; Sociology; Economics; Economy","score_opus":0.03166868806732721,"score_gpt":0.23789201090251455,"score_spread":0.20622332283518735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W45096477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010501118,0.064661324,0.0020532347,0.06291295,0.0008775263,0.00005674839,0.000025742784,0.000018423347,0.85889286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52127916,0.08429617,0.0032526806,0.015742335,0.0013740994,0.00022145773,0.000053846878,0.000062118685,0.3737181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888486,0.0005000853,0.000040052764,0.000084716376,0.00023690556,0.00025336104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899,0.0007368439,0.000066089546,0.000037585865,0.00010645454,0.00006299492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019043494,0.0003478953,0.00025109627,0.0012208814,0.0063834796,0.0060286,0.0006218558,0.002560609,0.004299555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034552175,0.0002654775,0.00019800627,0.0018658626,0.011464424,0.004904549,0.0025559939,0.003715176,0.0004621994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024731141,0.0000059659856,0.00007473163,0.000025967955,0.0000010170655,0.00015172397,0.004644237,0.00011049097,0.000043518965,0.98037016,0.008467541,0.00610213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007705369,0.000008593051,0.000578027,0.000501496,0.00000482606,0.00023816935,0.005555085,0.00024458356,0.00013341155,0.22686371,0.7658539,0.000010524008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02033178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02131749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02033178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006156501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058561144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044668794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W53876277","doi":"","title":"The human right of HIV positive persons to non-discrimination in getting life insurance in South Africa","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Life insurance; Business; Actuarial science; Medicine; Virology","score_opus":0.015376981192236096,"score_gpt":0.24928535247999145,"score_spread":0.23390837128775535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W53876277","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29937643,0.022046525,0.0014713506,0.4577869,0.0025697558,0.00022927157,0.00008283063,0.000025979685,0.21641085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87384784,0.005845971,0.0005750413,0.09481433,0.00035750275,0.00010711242,0.000014751468,0.000014786427,0.024422621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962328,0.0014305727,0.00019066535,0.00025806273,0.0004922399,0.0013956921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99709296,0.0017108776,0.00027064013,0.00014762266,0.00017034213,0.0006075409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056358078,0.0002282184,0.00029821394,0.0005188704,0.018786618,0.005584671,0.00095068564,0.0077153025,0.0032597804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007426562,0.0004268934,0.0003862403,0.00040754164,0.014838617,0.0034071058,0.008380323,0.010981855,0.0002054942],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071256996,0.00008245738,0.009359016,0.00025653854,0.000024974992,0.008608431,0.22651617,0.0001531898,0.002478456,0.68654364,0.035538014,0.030367794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011890912,0.0001666253,0.03203272,0.0031409033,0.000097915574,0.00715199,0.16922608,0.00046432603,0.0031701904,0.084271125,0.6999621,0.00019719708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07332566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1055281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07332566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004103186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014942312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14579773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W571589029","doi":"","title":"Empowerinig the customer : the citizen in public sector reform","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Commonwealth Secretariat eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Service (business); Legislation; Consumer protection; Business; Product (mathematics); Public relations; Public administration; Political science; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.060169288814793956,"score_gpt":0.3114004068688801,"score_spread":0.25123111805408616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W571589029","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006675002,0.033930298,0.0012436963,0.6815418,0.0034578384,0.00006234407,0.000041942538,0.0000782319,0.27296883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4442679,0.049226288,0.0014844397,0.104524,0.0059747603,0.000248707,0.000095324365,0.00014940897,0.39402917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967175,0.0019358648,0.00007713119,0.00011388407,0.00056395226,0.0005917388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99607927,0.0022555646,0.0002606127,0.00019471673,0.0006325848,0.00057732675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004405422,0.00021154461,0.0002873298,0.0007263346,0.0051990617,0.009334929,0.00058025593,0.005066537,0.014548774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008619544,0.00019791417,0.00021186232,0.0023086446,0.0077699893,0.009667245,0.0023785662,0.0044112,0.0015678282],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010264543,0.000043688404,0.00043489947,0.00015006487,0.000001752628,0.00014619115,0.01216694,0.00013829951,0.000052373212,0.46902123,0.4600945,0.057739813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056385497,0.000014551826,0.0007084464,0.00057668885,0.0000018480822,0.000057151636,0.015174203,0.00013238481,0.000070060116,0.07533085,0.90792,0.000008228834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010528326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013147323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014548774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008751616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01713804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06349772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W57840268","doi":"","title":"Practice and procedure : Default judgment - whether irregular - whether court has residual discretion not to set aside default judgment irregularly entered","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proctor/˜The œproctor","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Aside; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.031209756776568752,"score_gpt":0.32140707935036905,"score_spread":0.2901973225738003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W57840268","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31936854,0.0030878626,0.060392458,0.15000461,0.0019265721,0.0012675452,0.0014052475,0.00038624226,0.46216092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94765145,0.0003586016,0.008646388,0.02645994,0.00037401923,0.00031172164,0.00011051349,0.000077383105,0.016009998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9425755,0.023315497,0.0054667224,0.008819398,0.013498466,0.0063243746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8404602,0.11856954,0.009270262,0.013613331,0.015027826,0.0030589008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05477464,0.00024081502,0.0006517218,0.0013313701,0.0071276147,0.009185835,0.00265869,0.01077904,0.007600807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23936468,0.0005435033,0.000909299,0.0019014938,0.016029477,0.011022758,0.004477338,0.014309045,0.0012812732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000516561,0.00027299157,0.027672695,0.00024761906,0.00009639835,0.0010518245,0.021629687,0.00064630446,0.0018408654,0.82645833,0.059722096,0.059844743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005683029,0.0009918691,0.07600422,0.0018553304,0.00037277638,0.0024175097,0.030485133,0.006801095,0.008575852,0.6398239,0.23159777,0.00050615845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039115794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.071600586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05477464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006880105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017156651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28967947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W605378001","doi":"","title":"Gender and equality law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Ashgate eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feminist legal theory; Sociology; Gender studies; Feminism; Intersectionality; Feminist theory; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06162550175721081,"score_gpt":0.3242279264604541,"score_spread":0.2626024247032433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W605378001","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020444698,0.06726738,0.002310629,0.055323485,0.0076034623,0.00005685873,0.00042205252,0.00006537375,0.86490625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15931852,0.058140557,0.0040793526,0.052462436,0.018738326,0.0004506047,0.0011068538,0.00027918204,0.7054243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980726,0.00062977243,0.00007021479,0.00032368215,0.00064073305,0.00026296612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927884,0.00028847824,0.000054325847,0.00008172552,0.00020804879,0.00008860652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013117146,0.0005134984,0.000497176,0.0013474661,0.0030971782,0.005623873,0.0010733978,0.0025381155,0.049576394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031493218,0.0001756382,0.00045081574,0.0015360563,0.005659664,0.00474474,0.0034364967,0.0029565026,0.008433588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009416717,0.000018415283,0.0001903602,0.0000948183,0.000001809443,0.00003693244,0.0016018361,0.000052632542,0.00007609438,0.7837577,0.17721666,0.036943354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016095374,0.000005808922,0.00029477125,0.00028193116,0.0000010950612,0.00004072887,0.00059580815,0.000023029002,0.00004410074,0.07527061,0.92343754,0.0000030371987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043615205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002984358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049576394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004181432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026944818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16584957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W607177415","doi":"","title":"Strengthening ombudsman and human rights institutions in commonwealth small and island states : the Caribbean experience","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Complaint; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Public administration; Commission; Accountability; Constitution; Sociology","score_opus":0.038246839168161385,"score_gpt":0.3243750193872769,"score_spread":0.2861281802191155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W607177415","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40529004,0.034382347,0.0005756279,0.21752432,0.0019101684,0.00038053392,0.00018952528,0.00007067365,0.3396768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78478986,0.03312205,0.0010232703,0.025854325,0.00031030097,0.0004303534,0.0001441031,0.00007975141,0.154246],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704856,0.0010932402,0.00008207865,0.000088939334,0.00033055435,0.0013566616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99371284,0.0017322288,0.00034883744,0.0001786245,0.00093597366,0.0030914363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042925,0.00049272284,0.00043705417,0.0012213943,0.026860604,0.010598208,0.001932283,0.004483674,0.019516304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007438491,0.00035173877,0.00028482708,0.0036477905,0.008408392,0.005732654,0.013946231,0.0053067906,0.0005807188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007355263,0.00020783891,0.009971778,0.0008351604,0.000017161727,0.0037585928,0.7253458,0.00014805999,0.00080912246,0.10029631,0.069507904,0.089028716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008277349,0.000035683046,0.008124973,0.00078381255,0.000007506084,0.0001883079,0.53890854,0.000046552785,0.0001093458,0.0025683711,0.44918552,0.00003314949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57537585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7421286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57537585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020798935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06401303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8542497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W609023248","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1206","title":"A Road to Home: The Right to Housing In Canada and Around the World","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wellesley Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Right to the city; Political science; Public administration; Law; Economic growth; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.030145471920515615,"score_gpt":0.3342277108108299,"score_spread":0.30408223889031427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W609023248","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08344721,0.027140062,0.0008208628,0.5887298,0.0025402557,0.00009139257,0.0006055437,0.00003581026,0.29658905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78536445,0.02810902,0.0012627312,0.071735755,0.00040705595,0.00006071024,0.00028937077,0.00007792584,0.11269301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99441296,0.00051103113,0.00009288307,0.00029169745,0.001545377,0.0031460274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961358,0.0004602253,0.00014518476,0.000083005514,0.0012960433,0.0018796775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021098554,0.0004950039,0.0004856761,0.0013788195,0.054532394,0.01379375,0.0018890891,0.006213741,0.0074362205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052246936,0.0003201722,0.0003913907,0.0026538635,0.016924232,0.0043881787,0.005521716,0.008222087,0.00042040844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006923385,0.00009507724,0.01464866,0.00023493251,0.00003583415,0.0014854466,0.10158955,0.0005705804,0.00048211322,0.44825777,0.37272638,0.0598045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011471248,0.00001537179,0.020636812,0.00062192586,0.000027555465,0.00021021781,0.1477622,0.00022463438,0.00026688387,0.0158921,0.8141658,0.0001650382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9964826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99870896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11209446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11209446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28840753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81330603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W619865951","doi":"10.1163/9789004482128","title":"National Perspectives on Housing Rights","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Political science; Fundamental rights; Cultural rights; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.0277772318996029,"score_gpt":0.3260308464765297,"score_spread":0.2982536145769268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W619865951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002424547,0.014357453,0.00037779566,0.017594123,0.000793058,0.0000057226403,0.000035384313,0.00000922227,0.9644027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20863484,0.060306497,0.0021004055,0.02562831,0.0012812562,0.00014120518,0.00024783722,0.00006256925,0.7015971],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990578,0.00029838327,0.000033859735,0.00008690516,0.00030318738,0.0002198387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969554,0.00012563408,0.00002628425,0.00002408016,0.00008663151,0.000041773696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001194697,0.00034153313,0.00030352795,0.0009273929,0.005424921,0.0047850264,0.00050460664,0.0019565877,0.012347219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011067505,0.00017065834,0.00026404066,0.0016421643,0.0062240083,0.005784658,0.003370083,0.0039571547,0.0019409993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031016002,0.000010016901,0.00017576496,0.000058118105,0.0000011844916,0.000077498975,0.0054038293,0.000055763438,0.00005513564,0.9104682,0.0700035,0.013687872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011187736,0.000004825445,0.00046402094,0.00027820593,0.0000023367465,0.00013140339,0.004123779,0.00004374246,0.000047908827,0.037838597,0.95706123,0.0000028416662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015629807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04446545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015629807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007000142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038159818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050789893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W643519258","doi":"","title":"Reconstructing law and justice in a postcolony","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Indigenous; Political science; Comparative law; International law; Adjudication; Legislation; Law enforcement; Sociology","score_opus":0.02099535928535164,"score_gpt":0.3125496074605675,"score_spread":0.29155424817521586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W643519258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0178074,0.073004715,0.0014543856,0.056294378,0.007223038,0.000099699304,0.00028442184,0.00007835181,0.84375364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15056331,0.058830395,0.0030388562,0.009115134,0.0022665043,0.00009759113,0.00034402387,0.0000956509,0.77564853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983513,0.000052523144,0.000007843346,0.00001625748,0.00006555133,0.000022674749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997255,0.00015121495,0.000017881779,0.000013203165,0.00006103213,0.000031119795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003504518,0.00025710766,0.00014934687,0.0009572027,0.0026063418,0.0026355716,0.00036370673,0.0012066385,0.014944089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008374673,0.000086337466,0.00008339172,0.0011700935,0.0028143534,0.0035054253,0.00085956906,0.002037652,0.0015941437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002256797,0.000039331208,0.0004595827,0.0002297963,0.00000145457,0.00043788497,0.014647041,0.00013184216,0.00059234304,0.6491997,0.2580024,0.07623609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013551424,0.000007870338,0.0008680323,0.00026388542,8.7364674e-7,0.0001595567,0.0040569827,0.000052516956,0.0001773773,0.017665066,0.9767423,0.0000040825053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010163036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0233466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014944089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033927567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002648127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04999292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W650993297","doi":"","title":"Interpreting convention rights : essential human rights cases of the Commomwealth","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Butterworths eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Charter; Human rights; Law; Convention; Political science; Fundamental rights; Right to a fair trial; Freedom of thought; Right to property; Bill of rights; International human rights law; Conscience; Linguistic rights; Ex post facto law","score_opus":0.0201401076219856,"score_gpt":0.3149354175850776,"score_spread":0.294795309963092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W650993297","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025881564,0.004020809,0.007607641,0.025277775,0.001192798,0.00010966141,0.00014786505,0.000044749915,0.9590104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34587073,0.0095793605,0.016692553,0.027791144,0.0023535632,0.00074160355,0.00042409656,0.00028980192,0.59625715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940698,0.002788372,0.0002477912,0.00047577274,0.00167728,0.00074098306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963678,0.0024095247,0.00019354752,0.00032038483,0.00058842765,0.000120215365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067843487,0.00092314015,0.00034425748,0.0015010193,0.007622292,0.0093525145,0.0016236021,0.007728718,0.014482262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016052764,0.0003735771,0.00044562411,0.002133985,0.015011328,0.009109801,0.004391448,0.00632807,0.002590244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018812738,0.0000025943684,0.000038569164,0.000016404905,4.3722804e-7,0.000077131306,0.0024992938,0.00002794931,0.000027754746,0.96604764,0.02828012,0.0029801724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048114975,0.000004564998,0.00015212793,0.00039576908,0.0000028575503,0.00016252555,0.0022796276,0.00015801268,0.00026185985,0.38429305,0.61227554,0.000009265458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016960058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026499053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016960058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075732265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009619809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054947913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W652506007","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780195328103.003.0007","title":"Review of Laws Having Racially Disparate Impacts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disparate impact; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Race (biology); Context (archaeology); Law; White (mutation); Equal Protection Clause; Disparate treatment; Civil rights; Housing discrimination; Phenomenon; Sociology; History; Gender studies; Plaintiff","score_opus":0.04351004289165949,"score_gpt":0.34124635487102506,"score_spread":0.29773631197936556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W652506007","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00092343433,0.8779913,0.0008285692,0.01045043,0.0035065282,0.00007438392,0.00024252264,0.000040715593,0.105942026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012193208,0.95839727,0.0008287989,0.00938445,0.0017585449,0.00009160775,0.00039869302,0.000043250115,0.016904112],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979487,0.00049819396,0.00015700157,0.00015845026,0.0011055979,0.00013211217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924615,0.0044753496,0.0005231168,0.00029627472,0.0020960614,0.00014765408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031185343,0.0004107017,0.0008038442,0.009965987,0.0012505214,0.0025433518,0.0013304069,0.0023210072,0.0124035645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011073005,0.0003967758,0.00047708786,0.008833963,0.0026288682,0.0028425679,0.0010390313,0.0022566316,0.0025927385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016207607,0.000058649897,0.00036287183,0.008522312,0.000042543677,0.00019498843,0.0006429705,0.00043120814,0.00030511737,0.23335972,0.41425684,0.3418067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031592592,0.0000116960455,0.0007388728,0.008261558,0.000023167271,0.00007879926,0.00011771765,0.000032159693,0.00006856254,0.0047925306,0.98586595,0.000005889251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017020918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023312321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017020918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00474743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010097214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04149407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W652668216","doi":"","title":"The Malling of Property Law?: The Toronto Eaton Centre Cases, 1984-1987, and the Right to Exclude","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01967884701109915,"score_gpt":0.29394705477513694,"score_spread":0.2742682077640378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W652668216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46704268,0.01155661,0.0006690436,0.1781976,0.0006693586,0.0003012466,0.0010277554,0.000032428503,0.34050333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91285837,0.0019652979,0.00022204647,0.020569194,0.00025656418,0.00016888506,0.00010032883,0.000037671278,0.06382162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896498,0.0016779106,0.00034852413,0.0007426174,0.0017007097,0.00588047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98663586,0.0072018714,0.001522957,0.00046464286,0.0014872848,0.0026873292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008514157,0.0004823966,0.0008840392,0.0024763602,0.038462576,0.015604971,0.004504771,0.02312751,0.010144374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031103984,0.0011630097,0.00086726795,0.004519434,0.03636136,0.007328448,0.010997772,0.022937486,0.0004945806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017987967,0.00010173752,0.012404367,0.00013390834,0.000042859676,0.0024173518,0.084767915,0.0004229449,0.00031162662,0.831517,0.06114168,0.0065588406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003445802,0.00015920309,0.15484601,0.0014829146,0.00039673687,0.0010655032,0.25576004,0.000797199,0.0024251982,0.08285817,0.49934217,0.0005222543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94264394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98553616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085478246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.085478246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11150059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.620191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W655024480","doi":"10.2307/486360","title":"Black Lawyers, White Courts: The Soul of South African Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Law; White (mutation); Political science; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04081084140700945,"score_gpt":0.2721514198078341,"score_spread":0.23134057840082464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W655024480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40628022,0.011940287,0.001270763,0.3603697,0.0012907832,0.00009073435,0.000045657005,0.000026452886,0.21868533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90249676,0.0050600804,0.0005510528,0.036682967,0.00028714398,0.000070948234,0.000013338663,0.00004531585,0.054792356],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99630004,0.0017037515,0.00006713688,0.00026195438,0.0006674144,0.0009997905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99634296,0.001485023,0.00066483853,0.000109153145,0.00039829846,0.0009997499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004559638,0.00039236012,0.0003563255,0.0021330847,0.03676667,0.011543967,0.0006830381,0.004100996,0.00947119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010547647,0.00058006763,0.000162903,0.0019008749,0.022810405,0.006667658,0.008958409,0.006648428,0.000602239],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000218523,0.000040369625,0.0024736081,0.00008734279,0.000011688252,0.0009890781,0.7989743,0.000021967537,0.0006890239,0.16257685,0.018999824,0.015114271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020083864,0.0000302245,0.0053857854,0.00057559734,0.000016250331,0.0004256653,0.6827385,0.000057949826,0.00040857575,0.032222226,0.27809036,0.000028811857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045016814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10862124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045016814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007365079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011305457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08950961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6892489307","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.10003533","title":"The Concept of Automatic Disqualification or Mandatory Recusal by Judges with Interest in Matters Before them: The Unsettling and Its Impact on Judicial Corruption in Nigeria","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Economic Justice; Politics; Statute; Language change; Doctrine; Judicial opinion; Skepticism; Public interest","score_opus":0.0583047241381296,"score_gpt":0.3274472191566251,"score_spread":0.2691424950184955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6892489307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57776016,0.027795129,0.012141337,0.04207714,0.000993307,0.000097140946,0.000041190317,0.000030372557,0.3390643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911054,0.0021631178,0.0005756844,0.0019635612,0.00018373974,0.000022275666,0.0000071586614,0.000008302498,0.0039707115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99306124,0.0031743345,0.00043292262,0.0005210888,0.0016783177,0.0011320643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98953456,0.0059226216,0.002572808,0.0005686866,0.0011371411,0.00026410643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005857067,0.0002066519,0.00029315168,0.0010365966,0.0046376796,0.00649984,0.0006121674,0.00195385,0.0012946554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010115623,0.00020041798,0.00036013915,0.00088370277,0.015033687,0.003733364,0.0028664253,0.0044836826,0.00013416557],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005708429,0.0000628044,0.014999099,0.00020709538,0.000017011069,0.00061482436,0.020912811,0.0005707275,0.0008556705,0.9194204,0.0041001057,0.03818227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060687915,0.00050065765,0.13435805,0.00543851,0.0002310486,0.0031423883,0.065930985,0.0046106717,0.0057653603,0.41186225,0.3677954,0.00030390266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059475047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009918829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00649984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004128369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040069595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03097552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6893526805","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4707350","title":"Get back your ex lover permanently +27789189922 Newcastle Pietermaritzburg Pinetown Ulundi Umlazi Limpopo Giyani","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Romance; MAGIC (telescope); Passion; Commit; Witness; Humiliation; Regret; Mistake","score_opus":0.066983656726909,"score_gpt":0.30942753313537613,"score_spread":0.24244387640846715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6893526805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012439359,0.00028714642,0.00012416409,0.0010499315,0.0006065548,0.00008065538,0.0005824448,0.0001656801,0.99585956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013638835,0.00015123199,0.000054599084,0.00021377935,0.000031687614,0.000017313558,0.00020393814,0.0000515901,0.997912],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995372,0.00002208129,0.00001423488,0.00010489974,0.00014622393,0.00017537654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992167,0.000035834284,0.000029771905,0.000041217838,0.00021658398,0.000459968],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029717543,0.0006412119,0.0004503626,0.00061351544,0.0033060343,0.0025554795,0.0009016422,0.0013818601,0.8749721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081637857,0.00051060115,0.00031779648,0.00046242017,0.0003866855,0.0014473151,0.0028871845,0.0017277778,0.63469476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046231275,0.00005824923,0.00064482726,0.000052569318,0.0000020483087,0.00023634378,0.00007045678,0.00004054339,0.0005900967,0.0016977782,0.93953985,0.057021014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072925345,0.000021005235,0.0018793038,0.000049512066,0.0000013650252,0.000093462375,0.00015603298,0.00003665772,0.00011104702,0.000096146185,0.9975442,0.000003882355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018974302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08371774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1250279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017638392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022666242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17833704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6910463632","doi":"10.4102/satnt.v24i1&amp;amp;2.167","title":"’n Dekade van demokrasie: omgewingsbestuur in ’n veranderende wêreld","year":2005,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Die (integrated circuit); Fraternity","score_opus":0.2840603014863588,"score_gpt":0.5912630799197168,"score_spread":0.307202778433358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6910463632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058781385,0.044586882,0.0014802471,0.33003643,0.0041270917,0.00009817105,0.0009086013,0.00008987889,0.55989134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46791527,0.038955443,0.001496913,0.027040228,0.0010467917,0.0001214504,0.0009341193,0.00019056458,0.46229926],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610436,0.0015597703,0.00017548453,0.00037922955,0.0006985383,0.0010825552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99696463,0.00090138306,0.00025506862,0.00021625294,0.00059251976,0.0010700973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026332529,0.00037302848,0.00033118358,0.0009879463,0.006636465,0.007459835,0.0008164175,0.002753326,0.032537904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00748691,0.00027899112,0.00038874685,0.0013958174,0.0046614753,0.0054578534,0.0058393213,0.0039031636,0.0057137064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012708729,0.00010651878,0.0090607,0.0005948228,0.000029575984,0.00239881,0.06939028,0.0003251009,0.0007908342,0.2880126,0.4216138,0.20754987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065747076,0.000013221009,0.0043513044,0.0003435434,0.000006758152,0.00020930069,0.021858126,0.000038111142,0.00021645882,0.0074674203,0.9654741,0.000014947998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12747227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17657527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12747227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014211761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019907001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25346065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6912458403","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4707608","title":"Same day lost love spell +27789189922 Krugersdorp Pretoria Randburg Randfontein Roodepoort Soweto Springs Vanderbijlpark Greyton Greytown Griekwastad Groblersdal Groblershoop Groot Marico Haenertsburg Hammanskraal Hankey Harrismith Hartbeespoort Hattingspruit Hazyview Hectorspruit Heidelberg Heidelberg Heilbron","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Commit; Passion; Romance; MAGIC (telescope); Spell; Regret; Witness; Mistake; Humiliation","score_opus":0.03313571867822561,"score_gpt":0.26668217095675695,"score_spread":0.23354645227853132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6912458403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010666978,0.0004364658,0.00012701128,0.0010043415,0.0006791299,0.000061579114,0.0008684349,0.0001413802,0.9956149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001454041,0.00019701646,0.000052958847,0.00014537408,0.000033571225,0.000014300327,0.0002904091,0.00007517213,0.99773717],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995635,0.000026863298,0.000014386266,0.00010005323,0.00015104836,0.000144057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940634,0.000046298195,0.000026268981,0.000044281605,0.0001704557,0.00030639628],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002597586,0.0006425146,0.00039637715,0.0004764457,0.0020597489,0.0023177213,0.0006327659,0.0014023541,0.84420425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081737805,0.00043306104,0.00025938492,0.00046818814,0.00030832543,0.0013203224,0.0023963146,0.0013820662,0.6332976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004311474,0.000031054085,0.00035287405,0.00004658415,0.0000016841125,0.00014979964,0.000047032507,0.000057469842,0.0003964109,0.002124001,0.9460388,0.0507112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052498062,0.000013141906,0.0008406173,0.000031231575,8.674593e-7,0.00007179341,0.00007842778,0.00003148878,0.00008874862,0.00010167668,0.99873406,0.000002645189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010124498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03955248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15579575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010304521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013472487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22222376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6922616645","doi":"10.13140/rg.2.2.35636.24962","title":"PrEP interest, eligibility and initiation by MSM and transwomen in Cape Town and Port Elizabeth, South Africa","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cape; Port (circuit theory); Population; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.03308564114772294,"score_gpt":0.31284733283668975,"score_spread":0.2797616916889668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6922616645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980552,0.0001777165,0.000015355743,0.0005337218,0.0000062719164,0.000024874847,0.0001227686,7.3514167e-7,0.001063344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99869835,0.0002396984,0.00003102136,0.00009622888,0.0000050114477,0.000030242532,0.000046836885,0.0000015115397,0.00085113646],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869126,0.00041012964,0.000088819994,0.00009164198,0.00010916985,0.0006090533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975134,0.0006251551,0.00075494737,0.000047262438,0.0001924632,0.00086671853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001040785,0.0003315535,0.00038715545,0.001390066,0.0038578291,0.0022330468,0.0010655416,0.000934792,0.00565054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071543665,0.00063042244,0.00048752312,0.0025363932,0.0011879331,0.0017315734,0.0023755662,0.0018637629,0.00040260478],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024494663,0.00044415367,0.9326432,0.00013684355,0.00004855077,0.00248593,0.054368895,0.00009904367,0.00034768012,0.0009709632,0.0011651325,0.007044603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020340733,0.00012579643,0.8639369,0.0002993096,0.00003615078,0.0005184496,0.13330057,0.00018000681,0.00009651799,0.0002653859,0.0011977314,0.00002272356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37221488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4935006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37221488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027063321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005083552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7400967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6967838060","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.11461809","title":"IN Bram Fischerville/Mount Fletcher [[[[WhatsApp ((( (+27) 0633867063))) *____**)) ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN Bram Fischerville/Mount Fletcher KEMPTON PARK, GAUTENG JOHANNESBURG CBD. ABU DHABI, ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE Bram Fischerville/Mount Fletcher WhatsApp ((( (+27) 0633867063)))","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pill; Abortion; Mythology; Context (archaeology); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.03522970299789088,"score_gpt":0.30340770936277056,"score_spread":0.26817800636487965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6967838060","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006084966,0.00004446128,0.000024215797,0.00008923762,0.000014744729,0.000005252143,0.99782556,0.00010348368,0.0018321655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006699848,0.00013937519,0.00017921507,0.00012323509,0.000009605338,0.00007314304,0.9947331,0.000083707244,0.0039887317],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994585,0.00008862769,0.000075964905,0.00015813312,0.000116045274,0.00010272808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983491,0.0004938993,0.0002535775,0.00028536053,0.00041366564,0.00020443725],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075304136,0.0010610956,0.00087810645,0.0019497863,0.0006109887,0.0018306812,0.0013292731,0.0015129722,0.16649637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056646494,0.00071716163,0.0007506158,0.0050651236,0.00026433056,0.0011078353,0.0012552955,0.0010781012,0.15368758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004180995,0.0000055135292,0.00043080864,0.00039348294,0.000008473446,0.00000927739,0.000016115715,0.00007026264,0.000035549558,0.00037493787,0.99670804,0.0019056584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011919302,0.0000068847944,0.003888144,0.00028750856,0.000011026228,0.000018658211,0.000059734866,0.000084188265,0.00013284078,0.00038232503,0.99499714,0.000012272045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0767235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.109845944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8335036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021720934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024262883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55698586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6968669182","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4707674","title":"+27789189922 Quick Reacting Revenge Spells / Punish Your Enemy, Death Revenge Spells Amos London Chandler Whitehorse Gracefield North West Klerksdorp Mahikeng Mmabatho Potchefstroom Rustenburg Northern Cape Kimberley Kuruman Port Nolloth Western Cape Bellville Cape Town Constantia George Hopefield Oudtshoorn Paarl Simon's Town Stellenbosch Swellendam Worcester","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; MAGIC (telescope); Commit; Romance; Passion; Agency (philosophy); Mistake; Witness; Temptation; Cape","score_opus":0.044026416246285775,"score_gpt":0.2745897131878397,"score_spread":0.23056329694155392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6968669182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006992552,0.0002070373,0.0001366619,0.0014610232,0.0006254368,0.00008430518,0.00049802597,0.00022757842,0.99606067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001083199,0.00012641696,0.00004962987,0.0002647417,0.0000437062,0.000018713252,0.00018214878,0.000057420642,0.9981741],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921656,0.000065242,0.000037028418,0.00016152322,0.0002772593,0.00024235927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998218,0.00015143743,0.000082021936,0.000108941975,0.0005584658,0.00088117155],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048339914,0.0006818196,0.0004997913,0.0006668205,0.0023292566,0.0032285366,0.00093334797,0.0020455264,0.9098449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014465296,0.00048041766,0.00031467967,0.000688717,0.00041239613,0.0013889545,0.002229288,0.0014221964,0.79717916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039793933,0.000037015976,0.00028890837,0.000046298355,0.0000012908699,0.00013485359,0.000036377583,0.000038019865,0.00034870446,0.0012293198,0.9533679,0.04443155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014142652,0.000022726155,0.0008853145,0.000050672916,0.0000013948913,0.00011110963,0.00014163918,0.000058595622,0.00011300485,0.00017031895,0.99842644,0.0000046902232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006554689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027540121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090155125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015027698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00209616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1285953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6979709164","doi":"","title":"Access to justice for children with disabilities : the South African context","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Economic Justice; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Vulnerability (computing); Face (sociological concept)","score_opus":0.024932641230377164,"score_gpt":0.2855014813932423,"score_spread":0.26056884016286513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6979709164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88777655,0.014845708,0.0002520088,0.037816312,0.00017537769,0.00008391322,0.00013634845,0.000004780868,0.05890896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98325425,0.012893841,0.00015693514,0.0014510518,0.000051392395,0.000051357114,0.000020162204,0.000004288779,0.0021167435],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979797,0.000703885,0.00007820288,0.00008211332,0.00013903226,0.0010170521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810517,0.00094035914,0.00035347883,0.00004887057,0.00010036641,0.000451665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016352884,0.00042802622,0.00043454496,0.0019636997,0.012326008,0.0046288637,0.00079425797,0.0015820708,0.0057264334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035080113,0.0003319919,0.00028225087,0.0037741042,0.009638294,0.0041629593,0.008261316,0.0035451506,0.00016298285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006810439,0.00010458704,0.037934393,0.0012877467,0.00003170285,0.0153965745,0.73476374,0.00026972336,0.0011042311,0.17637552,0.00400493,0.028658815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013045469,0.00006218258,0.057313245,0.0021470697,0.000032316068,0.0028872504,0.86323917,0.000102234015,0.00033608233,0.012207826,0.06162691,0.000032626413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06777203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14491063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06777203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071002427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010897943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13475513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980053248","doi":"","title":"Aspects of corporate governance in South African public higher education institutions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Unisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Central University of Technology; Dartmouth College","keywords":"Corporate governance; Higher education; Accountability; Fiduciary; Government (linguistics); Constitution; Legislature; Democracy; Public sector","score_opus":0.047829847445294386,"score_gpt":0.25544970120549204,"score_spread":0.20761985376019765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980053248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6657925,0.0047469246,0.0018226348,0.015620386,0.00005013085,0.00013842997,0.00003521593,0.000008038348,0.3117856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99532384,0.0006615692,0.00010796565,0.00015609377,0.000011935793,0.000012309415,0.0000051385114,0.0000010289801,0.003720083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972365,0.0011655133,0.00008707976,0.00014113885,0.00039922827,0.0009704389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762243,0.0010281546,0.0007430687,0.00015019393,0.00021945522,0.00023671157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023546494,0.00013581457,0.00016479747,0.0013957688,0.005989555,0.009442563,0.0003143091,0.0011994244,0.0031468347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003993634,0.00027585423,0.00016349868,0.0027652793,0.009079892,0.0031827376,0.002156134,0.0014857952,0.00013454403],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000304208,0.00005588064,0.012161367,0.000081655366,0.000015559548,0.0008309006,0.04945732,0.00083287404,0.0003311717,0.9236739,0.0018012878,0.010727718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005388663,0.00013997043,0.16402149,0.0011720163,0.00006954275,0.0010091461,0.2194236,0.004611549,0.0012146076,0.35018122,0.25803143,0.000071624476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019667815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02162141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019667815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010426857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006880212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07565254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6982677247","doi":"","title":"KalaChasma))1844-461-2828-Netgear router tech support phone number 1844-461-2828 Netgear router Technical Support phone number 1844*461*2828&amp;gt;&amp;gt;Success","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Router; Core router; One-armed router; Phone; Telephone number","score_opus":0.020129653636588998,"score_gpt":0.31865445268967585,"score_spread":0.2985247990530869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6982677247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006525343,0.00011312602,0.0030515757,0.00065119774,0.0009512408,0.00012893806,0.00130522,0.0074468157,0.98569936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009864842,0.00005092447,0.00051729253,0.00015360065,0.0000708608,0.000031224532,0.0006424626,0.00087835203,0.9966689],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900705,0.00005660971,0.000021055404,0.00024515862,0.00046699762,0.0002031636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975746,0.00012393367,0.0000599551,0.00022782238,0.0011096593,0.0009040134],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057177054,0.0017909902,0.0010920177,0.0011808432,0.0024332243,0.0057554124,0.0017930688,0.0020837947,0.9093218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016257556,0.00071261264,0.00079350034,0.00071530166,0.00046440779,0.0023514929,0.0029651977,0.0020438265,0.9420305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054957873,0.000082213286,0.00016389576,0.00006316316,0.0000052323344,0.000051626423,0.000042280804,0.00013251297,0.0022925795,0.0019679023,0.9499548,0.045188934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023119797,0.000055312874,0.00046588527,0.00002486076,0.000008967413,0.00007739773,0.000074118165,0.00031437332,0.0011455269,0.000569991,0.9972255,0.000015052089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003333979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068027973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090678215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012987092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019878934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12934136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6984241281","doi":"","title":"Footy Round Up 16","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"League; Period (music)","score_opus":0.008705460783114584,"score_gpt":0.2236818040514332,"score_spread":0.21497634326831863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6984241281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00055566645,0.00041384852,0.00077721244,0.011113791,0.06704721,0.00060980726,0.006405964,0.0025765542,0.91049993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00052561174,0.0000816566,0.00012178291,0.0013459459,0.0018881491,0.00008617635,0.001038074,0.00034626748,0.99456644],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989213,0.00010885261,0.00005279721,0.00016203515,0.00044932656,0.00030581825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99478525,0.00023269672,0.000111612484,0.00028839408,0.0021142378,0.0024678935],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010591081,0.0012972505,0.00092633185,0.001291802,0.0045419275,0.007550152,0.0016073419,0.0036520527,0.89620435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005745347,0.0005789254,0.0008638107,0.0008472932,0.0005204969,0.0030733678,0.004994255,0.0043169707,0.805249],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015698823,0.000011225982,0.000026301215,0.000019279923,4.884107e-7,0.000018040377,0.000010633727,0.0000058974097,0.000031179716,0.00026912056,0.99254465,0.0070475573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010357557,0.000012710486,0.00021756986,0.00003068711,7.098703e-7,0.000009733198,0.00006238185,0.000010219729,0.00003302608,0.00020224348,0.9994056,0.0000047829526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075440733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026472174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10379565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017118778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027595402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1480518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986201470","doi":"","title":"Pathological vs non-pathological incapacity: are the differences in requirements and consequences justified?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Element (criminal law); Set (abstract data type); Order (exchange); Criminal law; Work (physics); Raising (metalworking)","score_opus":0.05515419264473335,"score_gpt":0.28562019867846716,"score_spread":0.23046600603373382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986201470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28024203,0.008843404,0.053961996,0.093802154,0.0010077338,0.00036101413,0.00023483048,0.00008579483,0.56146103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839824,0.0015894485,0.005357316,0.0025551242,0.00009777504,0.00010943332,0.000030771094,0.000026609243,0.0062511307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863327,0.0049106022,0.0008921422,0.0006237066,0.005783996,0.0014568121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98596734,0.006380801,0.0025951369,0.001195887,0.0030155361,0.0008454179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009664674,0.0004861319,0.0006194539,0.0017855265,0.0022597332,0.004606375,0.0025484823,0.0042153797,0.0039885067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03896441,0.00044454646,0.0007724945,0.001299115,0.032326374,0.0064077633,0.004123199,0.0065449546,0.00067432196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004726407,0.000024120289,0.0024284306,0.0002612846,0.000018630184,0.00039794968,0.007029239,0.0003765176,0.0007117444,0.9712195,0.00092092867,0.016564462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009194848,0.0003367582,0.045020707,0.0021421064,0.00010373877,0.0037642654,0.039616182,0.0017491884,0.002644075,0.8418845,0.062460426,0.00018617963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014586869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031566314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014586869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064500025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01023427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051112294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986511192","doi":"","title":"Problematic aspects of the right to bail under South African law : a comparison with Canadian law and proposals for reform","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Law reform; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Common law; Work (physics); Inheritance (genetic algorithm)","score_opus":0.012555987032548156,"score_gpt":0.24060820086957171,"score_spread":0.22805221383702357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986511192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19158821,0.004693628,0.0017572884,0.09763032,0.0002102912,0.00023355607,0.00013417652,0.000010984739,0.7037415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97618234,0.0019314972,0.0009115724,0.0043993415,0.00006363538,0.00007552852,0.000021754437,0.000016028403,0.016398381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826768,0.0046651145,0.000419739,0.0008555284,0.0052132853,0.006169532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857209,0.008406322,0.0008958559,0.0006423459,0.0032897678,0.0010448083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01545187,0.00046696913,0.00071564456,0.0056050196,0.0266749,0.018142676,0.0027055538,0.008187712,0.011044345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043357138,0.0005225014,0.00069834915,0.01071405,0.040084634,0.0067605716,0.0048344336,0.010477783,0.00027631276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001552644,0.0000112243915,0.00061297044,0.00003581885,0.0000046861273,0.00010460692,0.01711212,0.000115745155,0.000050720973,0.97736025,0.0015768271,0.002999478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013480739,0.000059861726,0.03265619,0.0021460166,0.00018493894,0.0003352544,0.19170493,0.002195616,0.00089300313,0.54308295,0.22641687,0.00018950962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8483841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9097402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15161592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12016836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13067886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87188655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987085448","doi":"","title":"Sex for sale : a comparative analysis of legal models and the socio-economic determinants informing law reform in South Africa","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Unisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legislation; Law reform; Normative; Context (archaeology); Interpretation (philosophy); Politics; Unemployment; Underpinning; Harm","score_opus":0.03832112884352523,"score_gpt":0.28081047166496864,"score_spread":0.2424893428214434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987085448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94405335,0.0028358162,0.00057560107,0.0046893093,0.000026176787,0.00011910302,0.000049232334,0.0000030311542,0.04764823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973705,0.0013449413,0.00016475469,0.00016098574,0.000005133569,0.000034270808,0.000013609852,0.0000039664,0.00090178056],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957151,0.0025133227,0.00017451907,0.00017739943,0.000609548,0.00081012753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904145,0.006962072,0.0013394882,0.00027954267,0.00061274617,0.00039165744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067315567,0.00020126192,0.0004549766,0.0045771827,0.0084125,0.005731466,0.0010761187,0.0010064599,0.0075347866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019160403,0.00037941497,0.00027878003,0.0058201114,0.011513993,0.006146391,0.004670289,0.002138772,0.00020078465],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005376371,0.000101574544,0.01819422,0.0004293648,0.000019759824,0.0013867762,0.74115366,0.00027871176,0.0004429413,0.2193137,0.0006556935,0.01796986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012813517,0.000059175636,0.03801786,0.0010611783,0.000025498304,0.00025375446,0.9209059,0.00037660898,0.00017541574,0.006462808,0.03262808,0.000020859352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055538673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1019195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055538673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017841693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0110100815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12945116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989196233","doi":"","title":"Advancing the right to education for First Nations children: Lessons in administrative dialogue from the South African constitutional experience","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Constitution; Human rights; Legislation; Right to education; Constitutional right","score_opus":0.025978215360173668,"score_gpt":0.3309598144570081,"score_spread":0.3049815990968344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989196233","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09562097,0.011676111,0.0022121689,0.5744862,0.0011157157,0.00013965131,0.00005048636,0.000024079274,0.3146746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9088538,0.0055317143,0.0016088092,0.0378689,0.00029821313,0.0001638452,0.000021696223,0.00006771466,0.045585327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98056865,0.010816002,0.0004950251,0.0007089466,0.0015646667,0.005846749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9743756,0.02012705,0.00060420606,0.0005605069,0.0009948984,0.003337796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03236808,0.00059438363,0.00087404286,0.0013292517,0.04708206,0.01877863,0.0018872388,0.011058797,0.011809938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031026531,0.0006098144,0.0004903184,0.0019311548,0.047842454,0.01392042,0.014705194,0.025628205,0.0006562124],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017716908,0.000053325246,0.0004061283,0.00009937484,0.0000049731266,0.0006141361,0.25839916,0.000115738825,0.00022024995,0.7216986,0.009039175,0.009331504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042346208,0.000041025665,0.002780649,0.0016420637,0.000013581506,0.00028786963,0.38846308,0.00013322203,0.00064214855,0.18357962,0.42230996,0.000064415144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08670911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14400245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91329086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024290903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061533447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17624366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990801151","doi":"","title":"Eli Lilly v Government of Canada: the tale of promise v expectation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation; Public policy; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.009613906869454271,"score_gpt":0.232641735591238,"score_spread":0.22302782872178373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990801151","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006264433,0.0055661285,0.0009961657,0.59898454,0.0019109341,0.000029413943,0.00011344959,0.00005086162,0.38608402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4693554,0.005517282,0.0007158497,0.24424334,0.0019494287,0.00007486712,0.00007670858,0.00032098513,0.27774614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833572,0.0026117843,0.0002558913,0.0010305484,0.0057335575,0.0070109935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854665,0.0045026448,0.00037451144,0.00060613226,0.0050153276,0.0040348875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011284684,0.000627708,0.0009740786,0.0016538342,0.033607528,0.02597815,0.0026862717,0.02638944,0.026559073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026532372,0.000593975,0.0007920736,0.0025448496,0.037194185,0.010994613,0.0075811762,0.029670577,0.002612854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026222839,0.000014263174,0.000358101,0.000036702288,0.000011651238,0.00019377089,0.004951269,0.0001305114,0.00008307296,0.79806817,0.18919595,0.006930172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030077214,0.000017948727,0.001294228,0.00048341643,0.000023309549,0.000135548,0.01989589,0.0003497665,0.00018860877,0.17463626,0.8028214,0.00012354634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.909445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93566704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09242727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09242727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16689575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67060995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991298623","doi":"","title":"Flexibility and differentiation: A plea for allowing national differentiation in the fundamental rights domain","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Council on Foreign Relations","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Flexibility (engineering); Domain (mathematical analysis); Variety (cybernetics)","score_opus":0.055304565306178194,"score_gpt":0.3281979367015723,"score_spread":0.27289337139539416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991298623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065000886,0.004668405,0.025897877,0.029804962,0.00055155304,0.00003646699,0.000040463292,0.000061668914,0.93243843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7256367,0.006156184,0.022002602,0.013448256,0.0013162796,0.00034439936,0.00010249817,0.00029237772,0.23070058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960537,0.0015235703,0.00018279912,0.00059127645,0.0011039558,0.0005446276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946509,0.0031905633,0.0002309965,0.0011951203,0.00039496407,0.00033755694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071856366,0.00055850256,0.0005575486,0.0011831885,0.004236014,0.0114653865,0.0015035126,0.004692338,0.009489339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0106170755,0.00037468827,0.00063674233,0.0019364578,0.030498656,0.02050856,0.0070074247,0.011232861,0.001284135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014295571,0.0000017655047,0.0000127834455,0.0000041247113,3.6072169e-7,0.0000065309637,0.00035984127,0.000049130394,0.000017237067,0.9973954,0.0007440748,0.001407249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037309119,0.000003869074,0.000089988236,0.00009002189,0.0000020337286,0.00006392287,0.0005237947,0.00023601092,0.00010980835,0.91499215,0.08387575,0.000008992214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007001345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0080154585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0114653865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007413277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073091825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05378741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991584681","doi":"","title":"Home Office Expenditure: A critical analysis of the applicable law governing the deductibility of home workspace expenses incurred by persons in employment - given the shift to working from home","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Legislature; Internal revenue; Statutory law; Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory interpretation; Common law; Tax law; Service (business)","score_opus":0.024976628264374707,"score_gpt":0.2850141485813095,"score_spread":0.26003752031693483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991584681","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15293884,0.034647476,0.015821362,0.14715534,0.004681772,0.000667252,0.0005495611,0.000064137705,0.64347434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85102916,0.023775658,0.008656353,0.025935471,0.0028309987,0.00041054896,0.00030645065,0.00016429658,0.08689107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99458045,0.0022970636,0.00031078665,0.0004396546,0.0016210888,0.0007509548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867545,0.010547349,0.0005831839,0.00022803816,0.0017242822,0.00016275918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010049508,0.00044674866,0.00043665688,0.0038130155,0.006621588,0.011718701,0.0016027022,0.0047144634,0.0040940107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017055843,0.00040831085,0.0006939215,0.002930972,0.015788384,0.00886522,0.0027182344,0.008201064,0.0006585738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033892993,0.00002609576,0.0011051042,0.00029687057,0.000005991325,0.0015347478,0.059936315,0.00025233597,0.00043568286,0.8988048,0.021412926,0.01615515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008655724,0.00006426719,0.010298939,0.00257876,0.00002157147,0.0006700251,0.106568195,0.0005970038,0.0012011612,0.08753028,0.7903938,0.00006719816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033075567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035530537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033075567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014969759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011651639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10861373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991760764","doi":"","title":"The influence of Part G of the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 on the general principles of contract","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; McMaster University","keywords":"Consumer protection; Consumer Protection Act; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Data Protection Act 1998","score_opus":0.020684960523053117,"score_gpt":0.253671840226745,"score_spread":0.23298687970369186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991760764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010655388,0.00263679,0.0007709858,0.051972963,0.0016994985,0.00040382185,0.0020089946,0.00009429892,0.9297573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16878682,0.0034031782,0.0045217667,0.077911004,0.0009260096,0.0013280716,0.0010686559,0.00020994595,0.7418446],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98590034,0.0037343975,0.0007401412,0.0010901554,0.0057399054,0.002795017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98595583,0.0077239536,0.0008099966,0.0008825857,0.0038194975,0.0008080269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010336593,0.00076225726,0.00068793935,0.0016859174,0.006274833,0.0062503214,0.0017217408,0.0135233365,0.01579014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036356762,0.00089766044,0.00073698105,0.0013988888,0.0046087736,0.002442155,0.002895646,0.014319891,0.0068931133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012958891,0.000093602,0.0014811896,0.00020526513,0.000013561406,0.00055192225,0.006645756,0.00024325967,0.0014332461,0.452061,0.51982826,0.017313326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055619465,0.00007558413,0.009911664,0.00079693965,0.00003463769,0.00017373601,0.0015344789,0.00023339284,0.0012124021,0.020622773,0.9652712,0.000077674806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21495526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28123036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21495526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014108167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02916403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42740816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6992701561","doi":"","title":"Market Conduct Regulation of the Retirement Fund Industry in South Africa","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Position (finance); Government (linguistics); Financial market; Financial services; Investment fund; Target date fund; Retirement age","score_opus":0.04078844407606409,"score_gpt":0.28251805328078045,"score_spread":0.24172960920471637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6992701561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7153064,0.013726374,0.007271856,0.057045467,0.00073178095,0.00062418,0.00034450102,0.00009209149,0.20485738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9617665,0.004580275,0.0017298113,0.003629083,0.0001321308,0.00017931184,0.00007995969,0.000022878703,0.02788015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99456066,0.0014863259,0.0003631403,0.00045142067,0.0015375521,0.0016009504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905936,0.0038002983,0.002766482,0.0005102336,0.0015924681,0.0007369624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060978425,0.0002320127,0.00020565906,0.0018609061,0.003268779,0.006052319,0.00096916914,0.0018202481,0.005599045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015241271,0.00046755638,0.00032187198,0.0012766789,0.00405336,0.0034919295,0.0040702284,0.0025781756,0.000474181],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002339869,0.00019695537,0.03161958,0.001424183,0.000037443828,0.0029548435,0.086662605,0.00162214,0.009592314,0.7011439,0.018244538,0.14626756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059755694,0.00021037515,0.12991428,0.0029512276,0.000053273256,0.00104036,0.035753664,0.0014124289,0.0060629547,0.027321897,0.79508764,0.00013211224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03292018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02700727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03292018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012183913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017622467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08840096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6993068654","doi":"","title":"Nova Scotia (Minister of Education &amp; Culture) v NSTU","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Appeal; Supreme court; Arbitration; Salary; Judgement; Geologist","score_opus":0.022438214142588803,"score_gpt":0.3180927186410187,"score_spread":0.2956545044984299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6993068654","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03227869,0.003447315,0.00019040922,0.027083063,0.0019391848,0.00016053894,0.0012822597,0.00006876267,0.9335497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18764354,0.0014050304,0.00027638653,0.03820192,0.0001497356,0.00013357853,0.00031926052,0.000029471139,0.77184105],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885845,0.000084382336,0.00003556627,0.00007603103,0.00031753126,0.00062799227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917233,0.0001614029,0.000041045732,0.000035312,0.00027568432,0.0003142064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066664163,0.00029961893,0.00020172262,0.00068753853,0.00794529,0.0029861191,0.0006606492,0.0037777887,0.024658846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020667394,0.00040785605,0.0002461662,0.0006551566,0.0011170746,0.00057669746,0.0012673428,0.0032495386,0.0037116953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001513176,0.000048743237,0.010329262,0.00021338125,0.000016365084,0.0049195187,0.003549249,0.00021918534,0.0016521203,0.15425397,0.80339664,0.02125031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034000408,0.000032740652,0.02378895,0.0003110986,0.000021889158,0.0006265724,0.0017215016,0.000161392,0.0006146304,0.002262871,0.9703874,0.00003693128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80261225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9467944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19738775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015232368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026086781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3971004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996743127","doi":"","title":"Suspended/Prospecteddeclarations of invalidity: a comparative analysis of the Canadian, South African, and Italian judicial techniques","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Padua  Archive (University of Padua)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Jurisprudence; Constitutional court; Discretion; Judicial review; Constitutional review; Dialogic; Margin of appreciation","score_opus":0.09628143754195496,"score_gpt":0.3789679774660526,"score_spread":0.28268653992409765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996743127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66695654,0.0070407065,0.0027829593,0.006990203,0.00011043481,0.00032484453,0.0002511727,0.000043854638,0.31549925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981079,0.004113241,0.0020718093,0.0007237365,0.000043664255,0.000055459717,0.000105701016,0.000028822491,0.011778539],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874362,0.0023977815,0.00036187295,0.0005610983,0.0058560753,0.0033871196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816952,0.007895359,0.0024609785,0.0010525859,0.0055778977,0.0013180753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008893095,0.00026625616,0.00037658008,0.0061986623,0.009088459,0.0053164074,0.0018298442,0.0012334354,0.004603175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037896015,0.0002749945,0.00046690615,0.008654396,0.008858514,0.0011784672,0.0019478005,0.002409087,0.00033087336],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004078024,0.00026211064,0.10155738,0.00082548225,0.00012189782,0.002368852,0.16643836,0.0012180312,0.00405663,0.51190615,0.015048924,0.19578838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013738201,0.00025558934,0.44223234,0.0019477947,0.00037132323,0.0023942045,0.12584902,0.002766482,0.0041668033,0.009335675,0.4102289,0.00031447504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8240151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9421369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17598492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03380056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050781865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35404265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998597474","doi":"","title":"Annual Report of the Town of Weymouth Containing the Reports of Selectmen, Town Treasurer, Town Accountant, Town Clerk, Assessors, and Other Officers and Committees for the Year Ending December 31, 1930","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"State Library's electronic repository (State Library of Massachusetts)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fogarty International Center; Ministry of Education, India","keywords":"Annual report; Year-ending; Small town; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.01257270448105904,"score_gpt":0.2558454238037035,"score_spread":0.24327271932264447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998597474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00989185,0.004141105,0.0004846554,0.0069134654,0.004944562,0.0002931057,0.09276408,0.00029852148,0.88026863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0054194094,0.0012525581,0.0002871957,0.00014361298,0.00024345571,0.00006369446,0.0045817303,0.00008616693,0.98792213],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984896,0.000025234538,0.000009393655,0.000023231676,0.00006173704,0.00003141732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950993,0.000053585685,0.00003132345,0.000033333403,0.00023710355,0.00013465274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002775418,0.00043044687,0.0001673887,0.0012259948,0.0013680076,0.0011913844,0.00051325106,0.00044181233,0.20759678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014430817,0.00029772762,0.00013288624,0.002086287,0.00028286132,0.0009066469,0.0006886786,0.0008150925,0.046437208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006870425,0.000022894266,0.0011381347,0.0001249767,0.0000028232855,0.00013827764,0.00033896943,0.00005984239,0.000325739,0.0028303585,0.966099,0.028850395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031361785,0.000005912263,0.006027777,0.000016667726,0.0000011334615,0.000018011558,0.00017006951,0.000011789963,0.00008862583,0.00009830926,0.99355584,0.0000027232265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11345192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2145842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20759678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011060665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003400584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6944804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998642473","doi":"","title":"2006 Annual Reports Of The Town Officers Of The Town Of Sandwich (The Oldest Town On Cape Cod) For The Year Ending December 31, 2006","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"State Library's electronic repository (State Library of Massachusetts)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Australian Government; Strong","keywords":"Cape; Year-ending; Quarter (Canadian coin); Duration (music)","score_opus":0.0071046947785648506,"score_gpt":0.23856290888475082,"score_spread":0.23145821410618597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998642473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007120065,0.002794331,0.00028668862,0.009142475,0.0060211057,0.00066121784,0.19729127,0.00050929276,0.77617353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031838273,0.0019423907,0.00028969607,0.00038275617,0.0003407729,0.00016152165,0.01543246,0.00012761203,0.978139],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945563,0.000043018685,0.00004148445,0.000035936468,0.00030461457,0.00011931233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968886,0.00016605009,0.0002459288,0.00010594833,0.0019286403,0.0006649596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093578023,0.0007100834,0.00037691605,0.003787445,0.0024305244,0.0024782277,0.00083463127,0.0011889464,0.19311576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038760537,0.00049595366,0.00022300944,0.0043596677,0.00034378306,0.0012924685,0.0009974422,0.0014035171,0.08710583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021364769,0.000023537268,0.00046472333,0.00007128514,9.449962e-7,0.00002511989,0.00013961598,0.000022413715,0.00004736109,0.00050585816,0.9908031,0.007874625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004638355,0.000008586771,0.009010654,0.00007478812,0.0000017997339,0.0000153764,0.00043665484,0.000014607592,0.00008217316,0.00007259125,0.99027175,0.0000063251264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16025199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26675758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19311576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002349233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009680684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64603657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000640663","doi":"","title":"F. Venter, Constitutional Comparison. Japon, Germany, Canada and South Africa as Constitutional States","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Persée (Ministère de lEnseignement supérieur et de la Recherche)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutional law; Government (linguistics); Constitutional court; Constitutional right; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.06478157638346205,"score_gpt":0.35107716249646503,"score_spread":0.286295586113003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000640663","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00433192,0.59324735,0.0025404915,0.11454687,0.002289615,0.00009746736,0.0013487535,0.00012940286,0.28146812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32363424,0.40250722,0.007240243,0.052834004,0.004701459,0.00067236,0.0015135315,0.00035699306,0.20653997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975259,0.00090936205,0.00011042971,0.00023421977,0.000707211,0.0005128467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973241,0.0017652458,0.00024396078,0.00008210385,0.00046619223,0.0001184365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025248986,0.001507053,0.00068525167,0.004448671,0.008574611,0.006460373,0.0023059489,0.01091007,0.01690964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006303504,0.00061769376,0.00061162293,0.010674001,0.0073786494,0.008325009,0.0019454012,0.004395434,0.0023376388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000559303,0.000036667047,0.0006433773,0.00033355827,0.000023489254,0.00022368546,0.004116042,0.00019104908,0.00013436445,0.48578826,0.47444966,0.03400391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007845541,0.000030617226,0.010181692,0.0015383203,0.00006560123,0.00023340511,0.00456151,0.00019005274,0.00060793397,0.22085635,0.7615598,0.00009623372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3622497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46578753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63775027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011042716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010797578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7202823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000756694","doi":"","title":"Halifax Regional Municipality (Metro Transit) v Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Position (finance); Supreme court; Transit (satellite); Government (linguistics); Discipline","score_opus":0.04024225870852339,"score_gpt":0.29695247289819854,"score_spread":0.25671021418967516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000756694","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15250707,0.001775014,0.00064357254,0.040270805,0.0015536688,0.00017069693,0.0018391045,0.00015427906,0.8010858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5136066,0.0005288476,0.00039673923,0.011957107,0.00024303282,0.00008743493,0.0004955709,0.000036862857,0.47264782],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894243,0.000111443886,0.000021600468,0.000072387185,0.00023751828,0.00061460724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992716,0.00016597466,0.00006238365,0.000031001655,0.00024283625,0.00022618473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000744782,0.00025439085,0.00017368884,0.0006655044,0.007049565,0.0023893462,0.0007372568,0.0027377154,0.024288727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001490615,0.0002372959,0.00022182993,0.000625423,0.0007454044,0.00070090377,0.0013458983,0.001621079,0.00263911],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023288623,0.00007766559,0.018729325,0.00021300906,0.00003146802,0.003313768,0.005750908,0.00030974008,0.00192964,0.23561075,0.69624835,0.037552524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009180968,0.00012767791,0.037955232,0.00015035171,0.000040813997,0.0008825429,0.003946336,0.0004472951,0.0012720374,0.0028738505,0.95217216,0.00003994435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35589653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59848595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35589653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00629614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007121337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70764995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009964305","doi":"","title":"Get Onsite Help and Support on all 1800 Microsoft 213-2171 Support that we sell..","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Microsoft Office Live Meeting; Phone; Microsoft excel; Distributed Component Object Model; Microsoft Office; Visual Basic for Applications","score_opus":0.0222033152421606,"score_gpt":0.30353024914083016,"score_spread":0.2813269338986696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009964305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017349414,0.00071468425,0.0029852637,0.0030295595,0.0016800824,0.00038130998,0.0028907459,0.03674389,0.9498395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003076238,0.000475174,0.001953977,0.0014541489,0.00042721737,0.00014710422,0.0019680224,0.004658796,0.9858393],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992501,0.000070702314,0.00003904545,0.00012803437,0.00034867902,0.000163414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963397,0.00033776296,0.00017022948,0.0004497495,0.0010972017,0.0016053658],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072114344,0.0019366146,0.0012056362,0.0022709365,0.001573554,0.004864621,0.0016967756,0.0020695354,0.9084888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051776688,0.0007578827,0.00077747606,0.0011099016,0.00032997306,0.0035642565,0.0037247613,0.0015266191,0.90088606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004171878,0.000070709386,0.00016544294,0.00005226488,0.0000024534197,0.000053647673,0.0000340783,0.000015717595,0.0003369403,0.00025411003,0.9244382,0.07453486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002772504,0.00004710183,0.0007473296,0.00008013644,0.0000067622377,0.00016651166,0.00016020189,0.000107798965,0.00038356785,0.0003561108,0.9978994,0.00001739578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022259196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035565423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09151119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044032096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001169562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13052958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010725451","doi":"","title":"Judicial discretion to exclude evidence in terms of s35(5) of the Constitution: S v Hena 2006 2 SACR 33 (SE)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Judicial discretion; Discretion; Section (typography); Fair trial; Admissible evidence","score_opus":0.04822013898818121,"score_gpt":0.2981487082366875,"score_spread":0.24992856924850626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010725451","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11164799,0.003845073,0.024180643,0.07637228,0.0024719085,0.00093211036,0.00095774804,0.00039235884,0.7791998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7812304,0.0013423933,0.012704428,0.12060633,0.0011208791,0.0007750963,0.00020088357,0.0001373798,0.08188227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801388,0.003997474,0.0024823712,0.0030272778,0.0064761653,0.0038778712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9782865,0.016409975,0.0011167336,0.0011818174,0.0023349493,0.00067001465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022295373,0.0007194987,0.0014032319,0.0018898345,0.008623469,0.011074657,0.0036073818,0.023803893,0.0048824693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04809698,0.0011674088,0.0015299814,0.0014383291,0.010850228,0.0043965024,0.004904081,0.02059824,0.0020976427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088406996,0.000064517175,0.0018934149,0.00015750455,0.00006963268,0.001566191,0.007314101,0.00034221594,0.0030560656,0.9268051,0.04845384,0.010188993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033597669,0.00031608986,0.0067006364,0.0020104826,0.00042088382,0.0022341816,0.0052619088,0.0024793942,0.009738845,0.32189277,0.6480801,0.00052873435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051915023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09245258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051915023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005759853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017909257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11791062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015254865","doi":"","title":"South African economy contracts marginally in third quarter","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Productivity; Work (physics); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.017701195793398197,"score_gpt":0.28531120107130387,"score_spread":0.2676100052779057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015254865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016801894,0.0015956647,0.00030242023,0.027104653,0.0019067086,0.00020792731,0.0049049393,0.000215092,0.94696075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022380745,0.00045793186,0.00010042558,0.0036653439,0.00017201128,0.00014561464,0.00047961704,0.000103018705,0.9724954],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871016,0.00014658249,0.0000531348,0.000083995925,0.00032150326,0.0006847651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977277,0.0007225816,0.0001869719,0.00016272711,0.00064588984,0.00055423204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016454699,0.0005320274,0.00039630727,0.0012256054,0.0042025275,0.0056684916,0.00085324765,0.006293387,0.21279497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077456757,0.0003784165,0.00041154298,0.0014764224,0.0008901199,0.0022182222,0.0029112382,0.0038719282,0.04467509],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015205625,0.00007733503,0.0026979917,0.00018458969,0.000013939827,0.00049688685,0.0010208195,0.00014950297,0.00058793987,0.1063548,0.84930426,0.0389598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003974247,0.000017460532,0.006263247,0.00013994526,0.000006157486,0.00009646452,0.00071526004,0.00016247595,0.0004798367,0.0030871828,0.9889803,0.000012001225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047207218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.081261374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21279497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042957785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009585294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7118701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017281018","doi":"","title":"Analysing the Onus Issue in Dismissals Emanating from the Enforcement of Unilateral Changes to Conditions of Employment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Appeal; Enforcement; Unfair dismissal; Collective bargaining; Compliance (psychology); Industrial relations; Labour law","score_opus":0.38911105385662553,"score_gpt":0.5929458640894302,"score_spread":0.20383481023280464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017281018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5921733,0.005449728,0.010344076,0.019898277,0.0006947993,0.00021385064,0.000055964436,0.000014736728,0.37115532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746839,0.0014695391,0.0009204165,0.0015668994,0.0004216104,0.00007344974,0.000021546519,0.000018580728,0.020824041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98050714,0.0064591505,0.0010516329,0.00082758174,0.005973661,0.0051808427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731923,0.017566912,0.0050351787,0.0008016127,0.0027446402,0.00065936596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0118759405,0.00041474093,0.00084408035,0.002739713,0.012566297,0.0120814135,0.002152579,0.008731523,0.0046113054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040938336,0.0005122567,0.00083165936,0.002554871,0.012784234,0.0047422796,0.0077547487,0.008341424,0.0006745067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013534827,0.00014420849,0.013592895,0.00021940423,0.000025654635,0.0048451223,0.03349707,0.0012457635,0.0009115752,0.920705,0.0023812552,0.022296662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089053145,0.00072937127,0.13175242,0.0029274058,0.0001808851,0.0042246524,0.22044522,0.0053128237,0.003973427,0.4269229,0.2030858,0.00035616502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015091526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028314553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015091526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009535361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007141565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069184184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018044156","doi":"","title":"CUPE, Local 805 v Prince Edward Island (Department of Health)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Process (computing); Trade union; Government (linguistics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.01317081162851128,"score_gpt":0.28975638754450955,"score_spread":0.27658557591599825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018044156","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026621198,0.002838453,0.0005001448,0.07731751,0.0009463379,0.00015160868,0.0014253356,0.0001397031,0.8900597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14485298,0.0012913741,0.00045326224,0.10754712,0.00021685255,0.00017260508,0.00046814833,0.000035852998,0.7449618],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921656,0.0000886108,0.000030453168,0.00008683404,0.00025047932,0.00032698427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903655,0.00034744915,0.00004490196,0.000046769263,0.00027513577,0.00024922765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001026838,0.00024084073,0.00013826396,0.0004947056,0.0072651915,0.0027431755,0.00077054685,0.006350017,0.03920124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002983097,0.0004754734,0.0002306505,0.00039551558,0.0012521716,0.0009790428,0.001224575,0.003351723,0.005278842],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053474916,0.00004516587,0.0067062844,0.00014086788,0.000010592886,0.0012461287,0.003842269,0.00007558019,0.0009615571,0.09054681,0.87954956,0.01682176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040024843,0.00004845062,0.019298332,0.00036970183,0.000029178598,0.00040278543,0.0043107755,0.00014065344,0.0010023516,0.0047064284,0.9696167,0.000034511602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23396528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49518716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7660347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029920393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075447196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46520692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020307919","doi":"","title":"La FAAS 7  : voisiner le quotidien de Sudbury","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Érudit (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sample (material); Identification (biology); Context (archaeology); Consumption (sociology)","score_opus":0.009671650424505867,"score_gpt":0.20999221734288848,"score_spread":0.2003205669183826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020307919","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055929683,0.04642588,0.0032520483,0.20604508,0.022155281,0.00039708044,0.0011845026,0.00039928898,0.66421115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14572015,0.008058792,0.0028123537,0.023823084,0.0014400053,0.00019895453,0.00027446746,0.00023249695,0.81743973],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962547,0.000942089,0.00015454326,0.0003874361,0.0010498043,0.0012114303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841726,0.00062376616,0.000090877,0.00008267173,0.00041548116,0.0003699017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036687441,0.0005430241,0.00046665495,0.0009785146,0.016071018,0.009707601,0.0011737803,0.0076193428,0.03500645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064966967,0.00059358624,0.00044538273,0.0009990057,0.002663417,0.0027242983,0.0034097524,0.00885614,0.0029981793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013953168,0.00006854782,0.0020280844,0.00025708877,0.00002916813,0.0022774339,0.019009575,0.00024507195,0.0033052359,0.36815003,0.54796916,0.05652104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000104710925,0.000011895053,0.0017890921,0.00013390247,0.0000053299987,0.00011844991,0.0035970842,0.000043533415,0.00044079375,0.001606665,0.99221706,0.000025683272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5208629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6417231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47913712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01570592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033370238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96391773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7021243051","doi":"","title":"\"Nothing in this act shall preclude any better ideas\" : exploring the relationship between legislation and governance","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Legislation; Corporate governance; Government (linguistics); Information governance; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.06363732535008361,"score_gpt":0.3074937234178696,"score_spread":0.24385639806778603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7021243051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34118107,0.0013016595,0.0016969806,0.24161246,0.00009464831,0.00007021413,0.00008265778,0.000010878417,0.41394955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97907126,0.00079389015,0.00032288046,0.004844563,0.00003022294,0.00007138391,0.000013498319,0.000012286388,0.014840027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.995952,0.0027848934,0.000042895444,0.0001687682,0.0003292977,0.0007220715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98274463,0.013393964,0.0017558612,0.00030026384,0.0007006666,0.0011045738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005220502,0.00015904773,0.00019109958,0.0010023204,0.010499301,0.010407793,0.0008489127,0.0034272235,0.008514845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021705547,0.00023510399,0.00021167696,0.0027876573,0.024848757,0.0066085774,0.003665709,0.004414158,0.0004058037],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013218893,0.000042287877,0.0072441516,0.000027165192,0.0000035196854,0.00012379639,0.070521556,0.00012302372,0.000049626695,0.91313004,0.004537253,0.0041844486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039755352,0.00006383155,0.066014096,0.0007451851,0.00004838814,0.00014416104,0.40435445,0.00080260506,0.00034270063,0.3630445,0.16436079,0.000039545186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09318885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16208866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09318885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011001107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021839555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18529284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024391737","doi":"","title":"Rethinking Volks v Robinson: The implications of appliying a \"contextualised choice model\" to prospective South African domestic partnership legislation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boloka Institutional Repository (North-west University)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sine qua non; General partnership; Legislation; Duty; Limited partnership; Position (finance); Legislature","score_opus":0.06620193021246602,"score_gpt":0.2729531309105742,"score_spread":0.2067512006981082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024391737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11881725,0.003922308,0.06702554,0.3594002,0.0017094553,0.00063849177,0.00019665701,0.0001347565,0.4481553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9129807,0.0012101574,0.014788648,0.04493014,0.0002912702,0.00047585886,0.000035150428,0.000060371956,0.025227826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9646507,0.024055433,0.00085725286,0.0027316038,0.005253339,0.0024517141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9680926,0.026895024,0.0010517262,0.0018742093,0.0011999641,0.00088639004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040067397,0.0004684962,0.000821766,0.0011296459,0.006390452,0.012595785,0.004026683,0.01018376,0.0049621933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040034328,0.00068631076,0.0010136203,0.0011013718,0.043425243,0.011966103,0.010055411,0.012401671,0.0005084923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031355994,0.000003187567,0.000058157133,0.000010263591,9.914055e-7,0.000035444507,0.0022646333,0.00014763181,0.00002137344,0.996114,0.0006417294,0.00069944636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006775038,0.00009092983,0.0007948347,0.0006020011,0.000026533759,0.00011695892,0.009153305,0.0040126233,0.00050123624,0.86219984,0.12234557,0.000088420056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051739562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06530627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051739562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014976067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025024798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21189916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027489545","doi":"","title":"Constitutional exclusion under s 35(5) of the Constitution : should an accused bear a ‘threshold burden’ of proving that his or her constitutional right has been infringed?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Charter; Constitution; Supreme court; Constitutional right; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional law","score_opus":0.09112931964103883,"score_gpt":0.2743497088664191,"score_spread":0.18322038922538025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027489545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30581942,0.0051258635,0.024851738,0.070226856,0.0012947671,0.00028602188,0.00018098124,0.00008535693,0.59212893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790566,0.0008289796,0.003942698,0.007979889,0.00030438023,0.00012216155,0.000037652146,0.000018380564,0.0077092703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97887224,0.0073663117,0.0020899815,0.0021463179,0.006009394,0.0035158512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795124,0.014039191,0.0020331135,0.0016090999,0.0022188262,0.00058732467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019316837,0.0004613738,0.00084135466,0.001885156,0.007602613,0.008704362,0.0015914122,0.009736026,0.0037437147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032039333,0.0005583679,0.00086832384,0.001248754,0.040215693,0.0067266235,0.0069175144,0.010354046,0.0005946264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018791567,0.0000086698265,0.00066347007,0.00004595795,0.000009405264,0.00035635603,0.007332509,0.00012767923,0.0006495605,0.9864934,0.00089389895,0.0034003032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084635656,0.00022409552,0.0070470353,0.001309785,0.00014160173,0.0013873326,0.016265614,0.00094960484,0.0030944343,0.7478124,0.22147563,0.00020786951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029074851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028883055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029074851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076539824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021576231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10215843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029867574","doi":"","title":"Lessons on affirmative action: a comparative study in South Africa, Malaysia and Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Theses database, Tilburg University","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Public policy; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.11541254679514537,"score_gpt":0.36263418854808815,"score_spread":0.24722164175294278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029867574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92594993,0.0015618966,0.00012918537,0.010609993,0.000041221665,0.00007400819,0.00033131152,0.000007001547,0.061295502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912499,0.001043501,0.00008966466,0.0004399817,0.0000047661547,0.000026849473,0.000055165252,0.000006623205,0.007083545],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99567467,0.0010135637,0.000103987164,0.00021718554,0.00094175787,0.0020489104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98584205,0.0065606846,0.0012200748,0.0003295055,0.0030578484,0.0029898006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004117775,0.00025832318,0.00048621764,0.0024762847,0.018444706,0.006205575,0.0016393656,0.0017659797,0.013590145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017462306,0.00028863945,0.00022942401,0.0069464096,0.007026445,0.0041192807,0.0040631755,0.002941112,0.00047416656],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023945382,0.0003631936,0.0781364,0.00033317078,0.000029849789,0.001655239,0.80896384,0.00026271737,0.00035906208,0.046629306,0.011484115,0.051543664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013336278,0.000036580055,0.0780518,0.00037403748,0.000018887078,0.00010302053,0.88927156,0.00011620483,0.00016986801,0.0012240135,0.030597456,0.000023288625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95150554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9805689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0583868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0583868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12831126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4236279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043418111","doi":"","title":"Socio-economic rights as constitutional human rights : Canada, India and South Africa","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Right to property; Government (linguistics); Constitution; Linguistic rights","score_opus":0.013658113396763483,"score_gpt":0.2738361110185248,"score_spread":0.2601779976217613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043418111","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27234653,0.042522546,0.0007032014,0.02938131,0.00021159994,0.0002162107,0.0022343795,0.00006529206,0.6523189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9085284,0.020434938,0.0007915313,0.0008648217,0.00006441987,0.00006602394,0.00041949606,0.000050048006,0.06878033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881905,0.00014434893,0.000032104486,0.000057758483,0.00028108127,0.00066553446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974955,0.0010515689,0.00017795524,0.00007347343,0.0005171553,0.00068436266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091022474,0.00060094777,0.00057861704,0.00475134,0.012817153,0.011331631,0.00156157,0.0022775603,0.013658044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004148034,0.00033769035,0.0003099074,0.022940382,0.0073523005,0.0032523582,0.0031237807,0.0030162984,0.00033043895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016365577,0.00014417965,0.012152206,0.0005312355,0.00003455144,0.0010687467,0.04775756,0.0021110591,0.00016390535,0.79394734,0.058416236,0.083509326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001464132,0.000053945736,0.105307244,0.001683938,0.00015393923,0.0005187077,0.24913546,0.0030887292,0.00070782023,0.1338301,0.5052162,0.00015750773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9899957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99594134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066784404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.066784404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10937252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48455703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7083692137","doi":"10.1002/aesr.202500258","title":"A Guideline to Evaluate Sorbent Performance for Atmospheric Water Harvesting","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sorbent; Guideline; Limiting; Moisture; Water quality; Certification; Water cycle","score_opus":0.0325014292133847,"score_gpt":0.4323894833573403,"score_spread":0.39988805414395556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7083692137","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08278089,0.047711663,0.6109157,0.0135634085,0.0051312083,0.03314139,0.03179923,0.008296243,0.16666025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.084603354,0.025094943,0.798938,0.0050129076,0.0004809301,0.022686841,0.018838357,0.0012227579,0.043121926],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98149306,0.0055857715,0.0029582465,0.0007699162,0.008509648,0.00068340765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9773357,0.0056331446,0.0015524601,0.0021391162,0.012956288,0.00038327725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016886717,0.003551299,0.0022684745,0.00780278,0.0025143488,0.003103449,0.0056837695,0.006867026,0.007768552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020386573,0.0014731031,0.002801244,0.0033767202,0.0020950632,0.0026733202,0.001901045,0.0038789124,0.015088146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000574925,0.0021039092,0.007185971,0.010812519,0.00019732727,0.0018944384,0.0014616605,0.0055732974,0.5875152,0.018214269,0.12613752,0.23832901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017337514,0.00220569,0.012671953,0.005015076,0.00026544958,0.0021723346,0.0012412474,0.0069862963,0.36875537,0.008597967,0.59164166,0.00027352702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055018226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010707825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016886717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001398549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065821223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08930653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095863645","doi":"","title":"FINANCIAL IMPACT","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject matter; Fence (mathematics); Subject (documents); Financial stability; Panel data; Financial compensation","score_opus":0.010282759079082831,"score_gpt":0.3625497519839267,"score_spread":0.35226699290484387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095863645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004062284,0.004441434,0.00053576933,0.17883326,0.039781813,0.00089751225,0.0697851,0.0010777755,0.70058507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06597022,0.007811215,0.0018899086,0.069106385,0.010268134,0.0011501025,0.059053116,0.0007462621,0.7840046],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872843,0.0012284447,0.00087821885,0.0008662936,0.006586161,0.003156573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9538305,0.004260475,0.0029233922,0.0018898597,0.022085663,0.015010115],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006923426,0.0008046121,0.0010280116,0.0026355716,0.0020047962,0.0063029937,0.0019560114,0.0050025764,0.43590644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07547006,0.00037153543,0.0010123594,0.0034267255,0.00096399506,0.0028165397,0.004723152,0.0035433655,0.22885233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016165625,0.000050680155,0.0018874378,0.00019466803,0.000014298811,0.00013811984,0.000040309482,0.000066971785,0.00006258921,0.0026717912,0.9440305,0.050680917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009930777,0.00007419339,0.0049809474,0.00046222785,0.000017372526,0.0002581164,0.0002564445,0.00017459766,0.00011191153,0.001609273,0.9919326,0.00002309566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016126916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016609393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5640936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067101913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029532647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80461097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097280216","doi":"","title":"Whether the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act supports the decision of Service Nova Scotia and Municipal Relations to disclose a Pre- Employment Reference Check.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of information; Personally identifiable information; Third party; Nova scotia; Service (business); Data Protection Act 1998; Information privacy","score_opus":0.02514901245633055,"score_gpt":0.3070245886306119,"score_spread":0.28187557617428133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097280216","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058955584,0.0015997471,0.0009456659,0.07493177,0.0029548649,0.00068155926,0.0038996,0.000106877305,0.85592425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37579146,0.0011124943,0.0016907662,0.05359807,0.00041077234,0.00043867686,0.0014763407,0.00006058783,0.56542087],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941129,0.0006390223,0.00028608734,0.0005566661,0.0016979146,0.0027074544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927443,0.0017762261,0.00043314864,0.0007175152,0.0030257646,0.0013030616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003243704,0.00030655155,0.00038033185,0.0007550796,0.009057537,0.005714617,0.0015672744,0.008659159,0.025567103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016433526,0.0004608861,0.00049919373,0.0008468469,0.0026323437,0.001707808,0.0018780018,0.0038368895,0.007051859],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037442296,0.00015806999,0.024862355,0.00030892872,0.000052363364,0.0032738536,0.0080863675,0.00039223718,0.0031471173,0.34309894,0.58252347,0.03372193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094839925,0.000098180346,0.04894421,0.0008115563,0.00005679008,0.00042717345,0.00425321,0.0006146544,0.0017377159,0.00683165,0.9359898,0.00014029177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8388069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91108567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16119307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016196815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059091844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32428473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7112446418","doi":"","title":"Remedies for Unreasonable Administrative Action after Vavilov","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Remedial education; Administrative law; Action (physics); Invocation; Core (optical fiber); Supreme court; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.039322525820764224,"score_gpt":0.3537405037262486,"score_spread":0.31441797790548437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7112446418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052589335,0.019235961,0.0325024,0.35296294,0.006977377,0.00033531437,0.00031671237,0.0006206784,0.53445935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80402744,0.0031063356,0.0067453217,0.11901031,0.0010857786,0.00014749156,0.00007285134,0.00010152938,0.06570292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98318565,0.0032432284,0.0009485996,0.0021821277,0.00691094,0.0035292713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99239856,0.004179141,0.000501322,0.00072360854,0.0018144787,0.00038275623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012828923,0.00044157883,0.00075400574,0.0014156624,0.012346376,0.00907939,0.002947994,0.013930537,0.0022930095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028437931,0.0005026902,0.0012243015,0.00088275434,0.018277265,0.004337433,0.0044339355,0.01852942,0.00052441785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075417934,0.000006643193,0.00026034305,0.000032399763,0.000007672594,0.00026072172,0.0020973887,0.00023447807,0.00014475716,0.9798012,0.012600965,0.0045458945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004606005,0.00007324901,0.00285362,0.0005757663,0.00007853145,0.0005617838,0.0044300803,0.0013426399,0.0018756709,0.344083,0.6439229,0.00015665576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2319371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3006348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2319371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016845435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045135222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4611742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7112651132","doi":"","title":"Ghana’s official creditors are scheduled to meet on Monday to discuss restructuring some $5.4 billion in loans to the country","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - Andrews University (Andrews University)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Creditor; Debt; Debt restructuring; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.015937274343449978,"score_gpt":0.2412574166559579,"score_spread":0.2253201423125079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7112651132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010327341,0.009435565,0.0005695423,0.32186434,0.022377636,0.00027109936,0.0037800255,0.00044472565,0.6309297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035151027,0.0049709463,0.001233165,0.025691317,0.0024589226,0.00011155511,0.0011059303,0.00017746461,0.9290997],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971193,0.000045979697,0.0000117266845,0.000031091786,0.00009560317,0.0001037164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877363,0.00018027403,0.000120231285,0.000031385956,0.00024382467,0.0006505608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009004,0.0003794987,0.00027379475,0.00039076307,0.002967038,0.0026470819,0.00031058237,0.0029514509,0.2382222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002156216,0.00023878245,0.00024882532,0.00056346157,0.0006631988,0.001737428,0.0010557043,0.0031279365,0.041956812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027294565,0.000014979954,0.0004840652,0.00003442747,0.0000010939139,0.00018602992,0.00017106054,0.000009394783,0.00034536468,0.001561603,0.985832,0.011332743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013606028,0.00001256474,0.001533676,0.000036946698,0.0000010761945,0.00004313612,0.00046729442,0.000012558643,0.00007300135,0.0002834346,0.99751925,0.000003550086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025180113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.064316034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2382222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018361624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022416678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79693264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7113059450","doi":"","title":"The Section 32(1) Analysis: Clarifying Eldridge in Light of York Region District School Board","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Charter; Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisprudence; High Court; George (robot)","score_opus":0.01629377792440269,"score_gpt":0.28440729282094773,"score_spread":0.26811351489654506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7113059450","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21381989,0.008362931,0.034000292,0.06795177,0.0021001522,0.00044878235,0.0011048296,0.00018816677,0.6720232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8530663,0.0027372558,0.014788999,0.018574663,0.0004448459,0.00028071788,0.00034205662,0.00014535064,0.10961979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993192,0.0014733744,0.00029356807,0.0013800293,0.0017376007,0.0019233989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941275,0.0021299452,0.000406424,0.0004771388,0.0024180762,0.00044101852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004347987,0.00036896195,0.0006974167,0.0017289452,0.011431572,0.013064875,0.0019517462,0.004990524,0.004646786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012079188,0.0007710151,0.00074417505,0.0017256119,0.015820907,0.0064979587,0.00453687,0.008638496,0.0006643248],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016494801,0.000006453866,0.0015353359,0.000037170477,0.000005439408,0.00026538773,0.013921293,0.0004549924,0.0003491582,0.9607641,0.017471377,0.005172859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053396285,0.00005567176,0.022203,0.001130538,0.000095041585,0.00020986874,0.034458213,0.0031515805,0.001988513,0.27783272,0.65850353,0.0003178536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8649674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9117249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8649674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058241576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07047583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42257416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7113509527","doi":"","title":"Reconceptualising the Judicial Role in the Allocation of Healthcare Resources: Lessons from Canada and South Africa?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bristol Research (University of Bristol)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Legislation; Legislature; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.08017680478293579,"score_gpt":0.33482053193705474,"score_spread":0.254643727154119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7113509527","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.099894315,0.011872115,0.0031482717,0.75453293,0.00096194755,0.00013158596,0.00016031298,0.00002433724,0.12927411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9387246,0.0053442265,0.002277606,0.043078575,0.00027686876,0.00008274423,0.000044337547,0.00005894792,0.010112128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.966519,0.011683292,0.0009582874,0.00125295,0.0043934537,0.015193002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9451147,0.028785624,0.0025477582,0.0012795096,0.012744113,0.009528297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032239467,0.0007056318,0.0011308107,0.00361528,0.035464965,0.026720034,0.0065702377,0.017532868,0.008929764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09575133,0.0008220988,0.00083153695,0.006636365,0.04413212,0.0122012,0.010951067,0.018911047,0.00041411514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007293934,0.000055882367,0.0044670287,0.00018320046,0.00006117585,0.0010050243,0.07467548,0.0010229992,0.00019312161,0.8661887,0.025909267,0.026165288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030903958,0.0000642415,0.02282401,0.003183684,0.0002460551,0.0006977604,0.32235843,0.0024108228,0.000663284,0.3866816,0.2602069,0.000354194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.966383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9825455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15781385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15781385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4125826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97681653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W71173951","doi":"","title":"Parole boards in South Africa: on the road to extinction? A comparative perspective","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Privilege (computing); Prison; Perspective (graphical); Law; Criminology; Public administration; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.08221764025382884,"score_gpt":0.3528631016499546,"score_spread":0.2706454613961258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W71173951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44704017,0.05097636,0.0015598702,0.05538281,0.0005583047,0.00011138087,0.00010590217,0.000015975651,0.44424918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9667977,0.018289888,0.00036426375,0.002605989,0.00008169523,0.00004990991,0.000029983426,0.000016130449,0.011764427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967212,0.0014033618,0.00007557775,0.00012106881,0.00034288652,0.001335879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996557,0.001582939,0.0006180028,0.00016061713,0.0005906237,0.00049077935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027517553,0.00028542674,0.0003657652,0.004133246,0.012107307,0.005838477,0.00089374965,0.0017159226,0.01133154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009422006,0.00028717917,0.00019556242,0.0047167055,0.010842626,0.0055758785,0.0055990135,0.0024066588,0.0003381965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009538417,0.000042530683,0.005800754,0.0006499021,0.000013652282,0.0026266207,0.24558713,0.0001899533,0.00073198305,0.66606426,0.0056650904,0.072532736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027041733,0.000092098664,0.035519697,0.0025405928,0.000028176963,0.0018024041,0.433625,0.00013968957,0.00055304857,0.026808545,0.49882823,0.000035379264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.118368246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16919746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.118368246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011650863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011888514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23535854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124602040","doi":"10.17159/pjdnzz54","title":"Criminal Justice for Female Victims of Domestic Violence: Time to Deal Defencelessness a Final Blow","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Domestic violence; Legislature; Plea; Notice; Legislation; Law enforcement; Presidential system","score_opus":0.025197674508300676,"score_gpt":0.3496766400808022,"score_spread":0.3244789655725015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124602040","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022678673,0.010132882,0.0001774862,0.969814,0.0097865835,0.000025180463,0.000019262667,0.000022331065,0.007754412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07012128,0.033866312,0.0015049296,0.8237249,0.025806993,0.00020514114,0.00010335578,0.00019444615,0.04447264],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99243236,0.0024197262,0.00035547614,0.0005492591,0.0015344676,0.002708655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985873,0.0045823194,0.0007293477,0.000495793,0.00237781,0.005941776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00787854,0.0007336973,0.000852628,0.0010433706,0.014082356,0.012946765,0.0027033917,0.022253579,0.021690518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022958323,0.00066712534,0.0009546681,0.00080485595,0.008123307,0.014348604,0.010783952,0.02672142,0.0027960846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044341632,0.00017707549,0.0015443445,0.00053462223,0.000016661908,0.0014107394,0.013175704,0.000049878083,0.00039030035,0.028840456,0.84116685,0.11264899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004266606,0.00019286411,0.0039609037,0.0035766775,0.000018395669,0.0017231704,0.06794566,0.00009788476,0.00019258163,0.018964428,0.90320194,0.000082870916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012791085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041115865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022253579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063757356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029488837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07256204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7126242126","doi":"10.64449/9781997468912","title":"Landmark Constitutional Cases that Changed South Africa: Volume 2","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book","venue":"UJ Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Dalhousie University; National Research Foundation; Universidade do Minho; University of Pittsburgh","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Constitutional law; Legislation; Constitution; Constitutional court; Constitutional review; High Court; Common law; Bill of rights; Human rights","score_opus":0.08881075822393716,"score_gpt":0.2997735386261752,"score_spread":0.210962780402238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7126242126","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07101698,0.047108606,0.00634231,0.21362072,0.02025837,0.00028322195,0.00049261237,0.00025583457,0.6406213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5354584,0.030848416,0.0050374214,0.067199506,0.0054390477,0.00036498875,0.00047028635,0.0004319378,0.35475004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981974,0.000485734,0.000060180024,0.00019233141,0.00059884007,0.00046549548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831855,0.0011120272,0.00010455574,0.00013834842,0.00022882438,0.000097673736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002161895,0.00032574686,0.0002731591,0.0017738316,0.006081974,0.008310967,0.0010088845,0.005741551,0.0075395335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0086662965,0.00038603673,0.0004835215,0.0020715334,0.007776076,0.005559647,0.0043781255,0.0064740162,0.0008222806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018274543,0.000017793765,0.00026710905,0.00017309195,0.000004089698,0.0008542665,0.016260019,0.00024581156,0.0009265488,0.857739,0.10222599,0.021268025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043900386,0.0000083388095,0.0005718509,0.00022810676,0.0000035530059,0.00017003866,0.0038630667,0.00006602707,0.0003515258,0.024800831,0.9699172,0.000015029711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016315008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022859342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016315008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008410321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046313577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061021447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133032279","doi":"","title":"Gender stereotypes in South African law: Hugo and beyond","year":2003,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec; Bibliographical Society of Canada; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Stereotype (UML); Stereotype threat; Natural (archaeology); Gender equality; Term (time); Racism","score_opus":0.02871949108432492,"score_gpt":0.35004913462427556,"score_spread":0.32132964353995064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133032279","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.563662,0.012005723,0.0023125943,0.05710167,0.0003031267,0.000045711025,0.000036627804,0.000009304436,0.3645232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903921,0.0019235114,0.00021759229,0.0024383871,0.00005238666,0.000014494294,0.0000034652205,0.000004954685,0.0049531735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977196,0.0012120806,0.000036871254,0.00013776237,0.00038600722,0.0005077493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978969,0.0014582138,0.00029850734,0.00007796972,0.000121263765,0.0001471845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034336743,0.00023560484,0.00025686264,0.0015261598,0.011561712,0.004374369,0.00038207803,0.0015957814,0.0048008477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004434293,0.00019667766,0.000174065,0.0016730904,0.022398498,0.0050843335,0.0048587658,0.0024076253,0.00016037277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002078505,0.000023623363,0.0039323177,0.000067259105,0.000004045395,0.0004861978,0.30158523,0.000058421236,0.00051971944,0.6746051,0.001815924,0.0168814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020476991,0.000063617874,0.025018893,0.0011448744,0.000021864182,0.0005782822,0.5139028,0.00024987105,0.0011475876,0.23842996,0.21938035,0.000041352432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03106662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04827413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03106662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005038061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00404217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06177157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7147116020","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v30i2.2915","title":"Revisiting the judicial role in the allocation of healthcare resources: on deference, democratic dialogue and deliberation","year":2005,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Deliberation; Argument (complex analysis); Health care; Deliberative democracy; Judicial review; Function (biology); Value (mathematics)","score_opus":0.028953187304734385,"score_gpt":0.34485750977645174,"score_spread":0.31590432247171735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7147116020","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16394697,0.019974785,0.07835232,0.42628688,0.0011969627,0.00017948517,0.000038704293,0.000042732918,0.30998114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98602146,0.0017072246,0.0030385978,0.00649648,0.00023391498,0.00006088493,0.000004978217,0.000015114694,0.0024213966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.877747,0.09737467,0.0025103923,0.003985828,0.009554768,0.008827232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8647261,0.11977263,0.004627556,0.0039897165,0.0049476842,0.0019362516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09530855,0.00050954224,0.0010537499,0.0030667942,0.01585913,0.023130063,0.003573603,0.0117236925,0.0021509174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08797858,0.0006017421,0.00077256805,0.002165358,0.13220438,0.021613754,0.017522097,0.013579014,0.00031073668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013579461,0.000009489036,0.00022644288,0.00005740583,0.000004528971,0.00010962036,0.025980895,0.00027160294,0.00008606195,0.9686779,0.00056850666,0.003994081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031652216,0.00003182693,0.00046334747,0.0005133021,0.000014247476,0.00011313775,0.027504908,0.0007261386,0.00040932503,0.9184213,0.051738877,0.000031932457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009790373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011328977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09530855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013681272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025779044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50404584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7147256335","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v32i2.2944","title":"Gronde vir die weiering van toegang tot inligting soos van toepassing op openbare instellings (deel I)","year":2007,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Appeal; Freedom of information; Promotion (chess); Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory law","score_opus":0.03694009050939181,"score_gpt":0.37725761096028226,"score_spread":0.3403175204508905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7147256335","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020516705,0.024806838,0.025274655,0.025198163,0.0058891214,0.0002501174,0.0015032525,0.0003747929,0.8961864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31723684,0.02423733,0.018827032,0.0050552157,0.0016981965,0.00041863348,0.0012270767,0.0010260768,0.63027346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99523264,0.0014192486,0.00036088633,0.00051736546,0.0019097604,0.00056002225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826753,0.0009474269,0.00017406256,0.00016901127,0.0003041341,0.00013772555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002395616,0.0008026478,0.0006164341,0.001523953,0.004165965,0.01247141,0.0012202872,0.00399798,0.075064175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009983777,0.00072017784,0.0004736933,0.0020040218,0.004442448,0.0052469615,0.00582513,0.0046962923,0.01927442],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005687133,0.00004686494,0.00040872724,0.00052869105,0.000017199347,0.0006531695,0.011429793,0.00049266615,0.0015656675,0.7882818,0.10928839,0.08723014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007812368,0.000010386311,0.00021943044,0.00028733767,0.0000054939937,0.00017937217,0.001393236,0.000118273754,0.0006577767,0.022685891,0.9744173,0.000017737146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016219944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020156348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075064175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035159911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005393375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25111473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161945555","doi":"10.82308/5331","title":"The Structure of Invalid but Operative Legislation: Why the Notwithstanding Clause Does Not Preclude Judicial Review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Constitution; Judicial opinion; Doctrine; Legislation; Interpretation (philosophy); Dormant Commerce Clause; Judicial activism","score_opus":0.028533301615737156,"score_gpt":0.3709455877957895,"score_spread":0.34241228618005237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161945555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.111585505,0.0055436254,0.051466927,0.19803408,0.0010622849,0.00036428322,0.00029395355,0.00016712939,0.6314823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9577928,0.0014248025,0.009621605,0.013834548,0.00049237086,0.00017332041,0.00006240183,0.00007990585,0.01651833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862454,0.0035719676,0.0005932997,0.0021011215,0.0049138167,0.0025743712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9700252,0.015891314,0.0023754118,0.0037996254,0.0066441614,0.0012642617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016102051,0.0002269754,0.0008428475,0.0016691715,0.0076131467,0.010123036,0.002387627,0.010025314,0.0056443224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05414397,0.00072689785,0.0006704994,0.001573575,0.053197477,0.009849926,0.0033950745,0.008362838,0.0008842208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004733895,0.000003105689,0.00017245293,0.000011212371,0.0000018723139,0.00003074876,0.0007686494,0.00006263833,0.000100127094,0.9965204,0.00097218156,0.001351935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009527628,0.000032878186,0.0020056216,0.00027970882,0.000030779254,0.00017930512,0.0012137512,0.0008895759,0.00076807075,0.9193381,0.0751158,0.000051149786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15817468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14655012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15817468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018248754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042201117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31450802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161974366","doi":"10.82308/50485","title":"Advancing the right to education for First Nations children: Lessons in administrative dialogue from the South African constitutional experience","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Charter; Fundamental rights; Human rights education; International human rights law; Democracy; Enforcement; Constitution","score_opus":0.026413952327486428,"score_gpt":0.3720208486128775,"score_spread":0.34560689628539104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161974366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18049227,0.016854491,0.0046587274,0.23078534,0.0007633684,0.00018837837,0.00008370439,0.00003459976,0.5661391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95620733,0.0060879225,0.002047281,0.010173649,0.00011253869,0.00010343986,0.000021134729,0.00003958992,0.025207154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854504,0.008692248,0.00033697655,0.00060809957,0.0015478156,0.0033644864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901191,0.0076342677,0.00030173472,0.00026612385,0.00068027264,0.0009985743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01870867,0.0005843037,0.00070977764,0.0017326319,0.049090706,0.016116079,0.0017673167,0.0062316605,0.005006245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012080093,0.0005982182,0.0004677686,0.0020542743,0.07086479,0.010238754,0.010921019,0.014274282,0.0003506381],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059520926,0.000013935657,0.00018256732,0.000050802813,0.0000018062713,0.00041956455,0.29776594,0.00008139539,0.00011903356,0.6964708,0.0019106015,0.0029776068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017803393,0.00002107719,0.0010814428,0.00090543774,0.000009528217,0.0003789994,0.49523404,0.0002276509,0.0005026666,0.09810593,0.4034582,0.00005730571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43293613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56184775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43293613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0564116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.070332445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86083233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W71771385","doi":"","title":"Indemnity costs - whether indemnity costs can be ordered in Magistrates Court","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proctor/˜The œproctor","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indemnity; Appeal; Honour; Loan; Law; Business; Actuarial science; Political science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.03135639991169576,"score_gpt":0.3295403591522502,"score_spread":0.29818395924055446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W71771385","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07050127,0.0013120145,0.0024729953,0.060391117,0.001174503,0.00030018197,0.0012388489,0.0000979202,0.8625111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.775475,0.0008572157,0.0012769902,0.043332025,0.0012994931,0.00028677922,0.000447362,0.00006504148,0.17696005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858764,0.0023874228,0.000785885,0.0012075711,0.0055432036,0.004199551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848535,0.0073938216,0.00093168527,0.0013724881,0.0042013074,0.0012471383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075603034,0.00038192509,0.0006489779,0.0017416634,0.005519247,0.0085830875,0.0027755864,0.012242364,0.035376966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049877882,0.00057584257,0.00081538036,0.001215697,0.0036796152,0.006979959,0.003538019,0.00837608,0.00531843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002644602,0.000212183,0.012471985,0.00017186973,0.00006262483,0.0018039607,0.0022978312,0.000404842,0.0013015649,0.76667976,0.18179283,0.03253611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026573087,0.00067103945,0.04780579,0.0014112368,0.000267695,0.002871822,0.0086736325,0.002154604,0.0047234125,0.17701292,0.7537857,0.000356402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033279017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.072311565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035376966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056682145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008654064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118347764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W72655083","doi":"","title":"Practice and procedure - District Court Act 1967 s79 - transfer of proceeding pending in Magistrates Court to District Court","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Discretion; Remand (court procedure); High Court; Political science; Court of equity; Court of record; Original jurisdiction; Jurisdiction; Supreme court","score_opus":0.01169614851392166,"score_gpt":0.26447828529699724,"score_spread":0.2527821367830756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W72655083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047872264,0.003202514,0.008564538,0.07680277,0.0043030577,0.0024642874,0.0031071506,0.0007750871,0.8529083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40525475,0.0016694576,0.01204676,0.13426936,0.002873447,0.0021542942,0.0010291509,0.0001588829,0.4405438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96253115,0.009684099,0.004614013,0.004039985,0.0104908785,0.008639838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747376,0.014208792,0.0016840812,0.0022290535,0.0054096566,0.0017308951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022486947,0.0006965263,0.0008844951,0.002471017,0.0127188815,0.010235068,0.0035936402,0.03147136,0.016069628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056715105,0.0020540564,0.0015455832,0.0025566916,0.0055017523,0.0030835206,0.0043144585,0.016288964,0.008781898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022180908,0.00028725,0.003856488,0.00019690009,0.000057211044,0.0016820825,0.006304295,0.0008807571,0.0033345409,0.61086696,0.3511326,0.02117904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027597178,0.0004766878,0.018676676,0.00085005496,0.00010858411,0.0011708534,0.002857229,0.0012415788,0.002241604,0.02584931,0.94587,0.00038145576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28149146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41610065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28149146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013761023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037821822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.559706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W72796938","doi":"10.29173/alr102","title":"&lt;i&gt;Progressive Homes Ltd. v. Lombard General Insurance Co. of Canada&lt;/i&gt;","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Duty; Law; Workmanship; Liability; Insurance policy; Liability insurance; Political science; Business; Economics; Operations management","score_opus":0.011746203514436651,"score_gpt":0.28126348985878635,"score_spread":0.2695172863443497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W72796938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03451931,0.008901468,0.00066403265,0.07287192,0.00067808427,0.00019534683,0.0020424582,0.00017733958,0.87995005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29540318,0.0055971416,0.0013962075,0.06179692,0.00026378792,0.00015474037,0.0009350391,0.00009089598,0.6343621],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745566,0.00012420958,0.00007121969,0.00017723934,0.0011536798,0.0010180101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775994,0.0006107125,0.00013542795,0.000076055985,0.0010525465,0.00036521655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014032051,0.00036588378,0.00020242529,0.001385792,0.009041231,0.0040623574,0.0012188329,0.0063777873,0.015134693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037532253,0.0006175799,0.00040772426,0.001550734,0.0025160285,0.0009019996,0.0007913132,0.004795711,0.0025656852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004955962,0.000042011718,0.00483563,0.00016921472,0.000022197093,0.0010985226,0.0022175715,0.00020094322,0.0015169568,0.20197748,0.76408666,0.023783244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045086286,0.00002707246,0.024820149,0.00024472334,0.00004759351,0.00024760407,0.002026891,0.00034696396,0.0013210248,0.00529789,0.9655042,0.00007075604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9433089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9777425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05669111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024322143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045283955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17647034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W74706850","doi":"","title":"Land use permits and water licences: improving enforcement of terms and conditions in the NWT","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada","keywords":"Enforcement; Business; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Geography; Environmental science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.021865758497316205,"score_gpt":0.25110752590460494,"score_spread":0.22924176740728874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W74706850","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87240285,0.00079100893,0.004142397,0.009326627,0.00004317232,0.0004427915,0.00018434697,0.00008729329,0.11257953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771766,0.00059311156,0.005048829,0.0005609432,0.00001282767,0.00007214605,0.00012947792,0.000015266482,0.016390922],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963561,0.0009965646,0.00012579416,0.00023269861,0.0010337097,0.0012551252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99158317,0.002920827,0.0011745809,0.000411445,0.0021463556,0.0017636322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00424423,0.00014637754,0.00022073745,0.001321819,0.005166148,0.0034901574,0.0016608223,0.0008756763,0.00414921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016258087,0.00019728865,0.00014881096,0.0023831849,0.0024779614,0.0018558255,0.0025970456,0.00095433154,0.00027957905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035306407,0.0012540411,0.32387638,0.0006720239,0.0000845539,0.0047003166,0.058403797,0.01692909,0.008880975,0.066592626,0.023302998,0.4949501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009302105,0.0005127989,0.66158885,0.00068478804,0.00008771734,0.00070500677,0.15148288,0.011144965,0.006207253,0.008202542,0.15914856,0.00014167334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9149738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96522516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085026205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021864453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09112831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17105383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W759495011","doi":"","title":"Changing House: The Law Affecting A Move Between Elected Offices","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Jurisdiction; Legislature; Law; Politics; Business; House of Representatives; Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.05732839688503895,"score_gpt":0.32578342572180186,"score_spread":0.2684550288367629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W759495011","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2555089,0.0047676056,0.0061379317,0.078791015,0.0016743047,0.0002372902,0.00032697085,0.00009855231,0.65245736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9350011,0.0011501503,0.0009963551,0.010708012,0.00032466024,0.00005326509,0.000060426944,0.00003570297,0.051670387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98458993,0.0029693458,0.00045895943,0.001201209,0.0043791984,0.0064013572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927624,0.0030054324,0.0008858685,0.0004306744,0.0016713017,0.0012444246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006784342,0.00014600715,0.00028089035,0.0014747587,0.012531919,0.006965913,0.0017775826,0.0038012986,0.0070923474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021013256,0.00032460387,0.00036193544,0.0018586365,0.012782381,0.0029504378,0.0037085405,0.0045779,0.00089190574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038907874,0.00004739893,0.0101799285,0.00006917609,0.000009936426,0.00066885195,0.015145093,0.00020458427,0.0008251701,0.910587,0.029481757,0.032742072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085704545,0.00014138242,0.06787312,0.00057226804,0.00007961444,0.0006641826,0.042487364,0.00054503966,0.002984259,0.05510927,0.82933384,0.00012393149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37352878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6191531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.984556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015443971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029977085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74270916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W77652136","doi":"","title":"Personal Injuries Proceedings Act 2002 s 27(1) – duty of respondent to give information and documents","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proctor/˜The œproctor","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Respondent; Law; Scope (computer science); Duty; Legislature; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Legislative history; Computer science","score_opus":0.01127528389158153,"score_gpt":0.3029806081498711,"score_spread":0.29170532425828954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W77652136","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01922142,0.002038186,0.003672203,0.14066236,0.004037697,0.0023937735,0.008185206,0.00066831836,0.8191209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08218845,0.0013705192,0.004778828,0.3705278,0.0013047114,0.0034680003,0.0019465393,0.0001772306,0.53423786],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836939,0.0041838014,0.0019421928,0.0014629859,0.0051228264,0.0035943387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984711,0.007514389,0.0009518089,0.0012172033,0.0046364665,0.0009692718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015389608,0.0006678728,0.00089786324,0.0011985261,0.0067630983,0.0065263193,0.0029085057,0.022075921,0.017836096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03303842,0.0016147477,0.0011199035,0.0013978673,0.002582149,0.002253401,0.0030331076,0.011597121,0.01944207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009192321,0.0001720463,0.0016388797,0.00018021736,0.0000133542735,0.00057792524,0.004616876,0.000140867,0.0020525793,0.12328866,0.8535402,0.013686569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059075766,0.00008281122,0.0057693087,0.00035195806,0.000016386859,0.000233569,0.0013672651,0.00013645255,0.0005154358,0.0025829491,0.9888049,0.0000800192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17154919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23317322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17154919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007747365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022307511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34110135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7808746","doi":"10.5553/arbac/.000007","title":"Het incorporatiebeding: verleden, heden en toekomst","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academie voor arbeidsrecht","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Trade union; Order (exchange); Quarter (Canadian coin); Character (mathematics); Labour law; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology; Business; Labour economics; Economics; Linguistics; History; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.032996095817226886,"score_gpt":0.3754511805984044,"score_spread":0.3424550847811775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7808746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07083796,0.022811837,0.013166887,0.027877891,0.0022053027,0.00011007921,0.0003819932,0.00011422762,0.8624938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74100906,0.007954158,0.0037194572,0.0033101311,0.00047378778,0.00010662522,0.00023156362,0.0002163802,0.24297872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963903,0.0013872645,0.0002523646,0.0003988473,0.0011058649,0.0004653974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985856,0.0007804961,0.00021997736,0.00012773709,0.00017142086,0.00011483874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002886246,0.00034301996,0.0003393411,0.00090048055,0.0031461585,0.00922516,0.0010904534,0.003228253,0.014776228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007603887,0.00038352463,0.0002188743,0.0013125057,0.0065032835,0.0054131397,0.0045471108,0.00369092,0.0017959961],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032126416,0.000026611822,0.0006630135,0.00013614465,0.0000073225656,0.0007282341,0.032784574,0.00012218404,0.0006281478,0.9278286,0.013453171,0.023589838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017871562,0.000016140837,0.0013028232,0.0005118558,0.000012541089,0.00045736603,0.015544447,0.00021211602,0.0010362539,0.036725566,0.94413984,0.000023294064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021671165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020599857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021671165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004723296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043286467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049431384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W806317943","doi":"","title":"The Battle Between Privacy and Policy in Quon v. City on Ontario: Employee Privacy Rights and the Operational Realities of the Workplace on Display at the Supreme Court","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privacy rights; Battle; Supreme court; Privacy policy; Privacy laws of the United States; Information privacy; Privacy law; Right to privacy; Internet privacy; Political science; Law; Business; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.02076179928572717,"score_gpt":0.3068944878887991,"score_spread":0.2861326886030719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W806317943","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18725944,0.0055817943,0.0034971423,0.42706618,0.00059669535,0.00012595074,0.00046810214,0.00003526171,0.3753694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9089334,0.0013657437,0.00085455494,0.03784329,0.00025008075,0.00007238905,0.000042445925,0.000041049356,0.050597116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891509,0.0028922856,0.0003657344,0.00091927644,0.0028767004,0.003795127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993349,0.0043606036,0.00031836916,0.0002868725,0.0010063385,0.0006787388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008259516,0.00031214915,0.00053381623,0.000705255,0.029782573,0.017591232,0.0027661484,0.025488025,0.0041382657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014878612,0.00082199543,0.0006620633,0.0021012553,0.030079877,0.005677828,0.0035728426,0.016986025,0.0002818537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048515918,0.000016025102,0.0014279013,0.0000381079,0.000014237043,0.0005212173,0.037444763,0.00024363075,0.00037787855,0.92988193,0.026846146,0.0031395755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016097458,0.00005918198,0.0149726365,0.0008149957,0.00016468909,0.00033452094,0.094563924,0.0016220952,0.0023600063,0.4085877,0.47600666,0.00035262335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9130694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9621613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08693057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.067251764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07765546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.487948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}