{"meta":{"query_hash":"f07094155be0","filters":{"topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa"},"cohort_total":731,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":731,"exported":731,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f07094155be0","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Legal+Issues+in+South+Africa"},"results":[{"id":"W1012836559","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1209","title":"Implementation of Housing Rights in South Africa: Approaches and Strategies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eviction; Disadvantaged; Political science; Economic growth; Jurisprudence; Fair Housing Act; Displacement (psychology); Development economics; Business; Law; Civil rights; Economics","score_opus":0.11425690676276906,"score_gpt":0.38279155091087763,"score_spread":0.26853464414810857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1012836559","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94152534,0.00031956317,0.000018005449,0.0008639045,0.00006022572,0.00006257715,0.0000044380085,0.000004386342,0.057141535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989496,0.00000570179,0.00025472647,0.000032166427,0.00073009636,4.5514858e-7,1.6206738e-7,0.0000029884732,0.000024130684],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914706,0.00014479533,0.00024891837,0.000052816176,0.0002562152,0.0001501961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995492,0.000026634367,0.00023993144,0.000022614784,0.00008148614,0.00008010191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067519175,0.000053546108,0.00017794137,0.000090142756,0.00017116453,0.00008680526,0.000071165465,0.0000625781,0.000002530781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002557428,0.000045023236,0.000029415269,0.00013576729,0.00037852116,0.0003865919,0.000022883829,0.00009621637,2.1808897e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009276932,0.0000097598995,0.0007132537,0.000005161686,0.000007231301,0.0000017269339,0.55900264,9.2629597e-7,0.000006736363,0.4398715,0.0000188037,0.00035296258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016550353,0.00018633768,0.0045444136,0.0000248324,0.000046710018,0.0000020895,0.75742394,0.0000035785874,0.00010700409,0.19268252,0.04314609,0.00017745547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013927091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038151683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24718899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000688926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003384392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99263924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W11550258","doi":"10.1002/mrm.1236","title":"A comparison of South African and Canadian anti-terrorism legislation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute","keywords":"Terrorism; Law; Duty; Political science; Legislation; Publicity; Democracy; Listing (finance); Presumption of innocence; Presumption; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.04988849936487587,"score_gpt":0.3452407630339255,"score_spread":0.2953522636690496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W11550258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93190205,0.002295764,0.0013123207,0.0021155267,0.00088232826,0.00027000252,0.00006332138,0.000032431817,0.06112628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99383503,0.00001692414,0.004444352,0.00012168029,0.0012997523,0.0000017571468,0.0000013094665,0.000025220761,0.00025395144],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996771,0.00037154742,0.0009326072,0.00024862692,0.0010012173,0.00067503157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967469,0.00025048826,0.0011396175,0.00023198793,0.0006950464,0.0009359609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014560053,0.00023224392,0.00063498924,0.0005553789,0.00050909584,0.00012763003,0.0005865562,0.00016544739,0.00012222363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001253466,0.00022257012,0.00015384078,0.0006029168,0.0007742522,0.00050204,0.00005157318,0.0005413986,0.000022393759],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104613704,0.00006788462,0.010853512,0.00007057475,0.000051320923,0.000034010114,0.9819466,0.00033286322,0.00006463704,0.0026055744,0.00023496118,0.0036334603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076934573,0.0004558829,0.006499916,0.00013287604,0.0019044649,0.000023194281,0.9089617,0.00035157832,0.00014301324,0.00017381343,0.080163255,0.00042097142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009599217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010067961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079928294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029745238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010676299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W118265215","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2006/v9i2a2817","title":"Deference and Diffèrance: Judicial Review and the Perfect Gift","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Judicial deference; Economic Justice; Positivism; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Liberalism; Relation (database); Judicial restraint; Action (physics); Political science; Judicial activism; Politics","score_opus":0.010716278119482435,"score_gpt":0.30772149438429386,"score_spread":0.2970052162648114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W118265215","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09436609,0.6852048,0.0005323313,0.09011768,0.0013865902,0.003418372,0.000037287664,0.00045326483,0.12448356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85396594,0.14102462,0.00023649352,0.001228713,0.0015382284,0.00012023698,0.0000033539002,0.0000926545,0.001789736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919617,0.0016118467,0.0010867696,0.0010196085,0.0014785404,0.002841509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946739,0.0008201947,0.0014689582,0.0016814033,0.00049142627,0.00086411275],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006972998,0.00081855385,0.0015446364,0.000113262206,0.01186462,0.0022491268,0.0026153657,0.00040485163,0.00024450835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031747837,0.0005951649,0.00045843335,0.00030072618,0.007589112,0.0016772373,0.00068746024,0.0032625599,0.000056604975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008447648,0.00017610396,0.0034733622,0.00042875818,0.0011152277,0.00009919647,0.023002584,0.0000054683355,0.00011893595,0.93591547,0.00316117,0.031658962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0087134205,0.00064496463,0.0015928693,0.0010216177,0.002285791,0.00060125306,0.0038977782,0.00007170264,0.0001414085,0.09121913,0.8881078,0.001702322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047029234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009512031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8849466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080113544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010659252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W124357938","doi":"","title":"Principles of South African Constitutional Law, Bernard Bekink : book review","year":2013,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Journal of South African Law / Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutional law; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Constitutional economics; Democracy; Scrutiny; Comparative law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.030024505623611114,"score_gpt":0.2864287503746599,"score_spread":0.25640424475104884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W124357938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073386044,0.36342865,0.0007062602,0.018346995,0.00399016,0.0040637185,0.0016284563,0.00027948848,0.60021764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9688778,0.00874601,0.0028341813,0.0035460386,0.0029280651,0.000099768666,0.000027943152,0.00019115841,0.012749068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98261094,0.002147168,0.0059255213,0.0014104714,0.0052631996,0.0026427151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98357284,0.0011752885,0.0075955973,0.0017548791,0.0037440874,0.0021573275],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005223682,0.001615568,0.0040122843,0.0006136766,0.0015702503,0.0006282514,0.0036070372,0.0009612857,0.0036428815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018152838,0.0014057854,0.0024257323,0.0019745624,0.014979499,0.0023297668,0.0007697618,0.0024358267,0.0009822005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00087612757,0.0021887734,0.003730245,0.0043964284,0.0031392379,0.00082686264,0.20958829,0.00045541246,0.0005640536,0.7188062,0.054091457,0.0013369072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019088873,0.000874562,0.00025756,0.0057002325,0.0016771721,0.00008451434,0.01391087,0.000029733175,0.00035108314,0.001358241,0.97231704,0.0015301065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038561984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041367247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96153915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011670595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029073283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W126668471","doi":"","title":"\"Charter\" Equality at Twenty: Reflections of a Card-carrying Member of the Court Party","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Member states; Business","score_opus":0.02897778122635856,"score_gpt":0.33878209491483047,"score_spread":0.3098043136884719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W126668471","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8435948,0.0040958007,0.00089473167,0.0032568062,0.0011443261,0.00034021967,0.000021518304,0.00005020542,0.14660162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99070543,0.0002061795,0.00005649588,0.00002860378,0.00045595266,0.0000041174294,7.897366e-7,0.000012475804,0.008529967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967615,0.00052335334,0.0004524587,0.00015227644,0.00074024516,0.0013701697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890447,0.00010505619,0.00045061277,0.00025692213,0.00022037819,0.00006254945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031123762,0.0001097619,0.00023398499,0.000052968564,0.00079226657,0.000029000545,0.0004566881,0.00010070047,0.00010914137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016596838,0.00008141777,0.0002555404,0.00045529462,0.0003957901,0.00015440187,0.00008114284,0.0008991882,0.000009771605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011190649,0.00031256236,0.09766233,0.00002867245,0.0004051068,0.0000021806277,0.06886281,0.00029622493,0.008651011,0.8194561,0.0026210465,0.0015900639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014647515,0.000284038,0.0061734617,0.000107394335,0.00037920807,0.00007233695,0.030424928,0.000036814246,0.0062783207,0.5049597,0.4492662,0.0005528226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052291243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036795367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44664514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014329812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001765917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9807806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W138268285","doi":"","title":"La battaglia legale por il same-sex marriage in Canada e Sudafrica: eguaglianza e dignità umana versus libertà religiosa","year":2004,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Giurisprudenza costituzionale","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.023613204354075375,"score_gpt":0.28204363567098767,"score_spread":0.2584304313169123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W138268285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45083788,0.012275518,0.00008836121,0.010175982,0.015307114,0.002880673,0.0019727848,0.00047767337,0.505984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708044,0.0008332208,0.00070393074,0.0011179396,0.0016354849,0.00014465915,0.00009893699,0.0001612998,0.024500117],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900104,0.00089666573,0.0015775033,0.001806386,0.0032173425,0.0024917515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99448884,0.001906297,0.0006282242,0.0013836327,0.00035625682,0.00123675],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015110626,0.001098409,0.0012966424,0.00043202812,0.0011037728,0.00054562534,0.0024574336,0.00082021457,0.002440031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001820992,0.0012422226,0.00041928396,0.0024748016,0.001270267,0.0010765027,0.0007100285,0.0019739792,0.0018362754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003770003,0.004214063,0.063944735,0.0009522657,0.0017411502,0.02446371,0.29826644,0.010542037,0.00036422882,0.17558633,0.4071412,0.009013832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00601901,0.0001934991,0.0037189913,0.00044193232,0.00018209116,0.000019797306,0.011284935,0.000037702866,0.00037349554,0.0024364109,0.9735889,0.0017032737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9207045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9313003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5664477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00749866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013713363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99900275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480688557","doi":"10.17159/2413-3108/2011/v0i37a859","title":"On the record: Interview with Peter Tinsley, Executive Director of the Institute for Justice Sector Development, Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Crime Quarterly","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Agency (philosophy); Law; Political science; Executive director; Management; Criminal justice; Executive committee; Sociology; Public administration; Social science; Economics","score_opus":0.03420687557096986,"score_gpt":0.2653350629216637,"score_spread":0.23112818735069385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480688557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5711332,0.00030060628,0.0048270654,0.015325802,0.0066488427,0.005270627,0.001307053,0.00029456854,0.39489228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98940945,6.218647e-7,0.000686927,0.00057832047,0.00022780383,0.00015818838,0.000001603154,0.00002970937,0.008907355],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976514,0.00040413855,0.0003734686,0.00038336846,0.0006495763,0.0005380291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978073,0.0008689477,0.00035270848,0.0005275643,0.00028385126,0.00015961406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006338591,0.00024601983,0.00029252973,0.000046590223,0.0006752109,0.00005852598,0.0009808278,0.00006702436,0.00016067289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051557214,0.00010997962,0.00010710459,0.0003970622,0.00071719405,0.00015066775,0.000040959894,0.0001552598,0.000028971717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004472729,0.0001400701,0.0014861514,0.00016837099,0.00035720118,0.0000103415005,0.89872974,0.000001294534,0.00022836885,0.041773748,0.028203659,0.028453793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006377545,0.0004676247,0.0015619523,0.00038252873,0.00016465622,6.3169153e-7,0.039677054,0.000001607708,0.0006419476,0.00056356256,0.9554719,0.00042879346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041925896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.356744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9272682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040610734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018561407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.964454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480722926","doi":"","title":"SWEAT: Engaging with Trafficking in Women in South Africa - An NGO Perspective","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); SWEAT; Gender studies; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Medicine; Art; Internal medicine; Visual arts","score_opus":0.028500495896318805,"score_gpt":0.2882858397152443,"score_spread":0.2597853438189255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480722926","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8810704,0.0021079462,6.291549e-7,0.00019315635,0.00017290485,0.00028483538,0.0000076063525,0.000055137476,0.11610739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980918,0.00003786619,0.00012067411,0.00016222865,0.000079026904,0.00022091022,2.556111e-7,0.000026582495,0.0012606521],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99654263,0.0004501463,0.00022844225,0.00047050964,0.00032370246,0.0019845467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855316,0.0002208762,0.000066161905,0.00021320519,0.00015667938,0.0007898979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016949208,0.00021699558,0.00037851208,0.00047456688,0.0010463746,0.00013931062,0.00028099172,0.000083732884,0.00004858246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015022388,0.00021386672,0.000022727421,0.0012885802,0.00059131096,0.000308095,0.00002323412,0.00034282653,0.000019277602],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015575506,0.000018803385,0.0074780965,0.0000051645243,0.000039189363,0.00012231793,0.9679606,0.00005162273,7.9021225e-7,0.024146093,0.000013552583,0.00014818323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041294083,0.00008472132,0.00043787275,0.000035852823,0.000003270386,2.9580548e-7,0.95010436,0.0000029738765,0.0000014152317,0.004399611,0.04423114,0.00028552863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072469646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4339156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4266686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01075726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013802921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483718433","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v34i3.12000","title":"HUNG OUT TO DRY? ATTORNEY-CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY AND THE REPORTING DUTIES IMPOSED BY THE FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE CENTRE ACT 38 OF 2001","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Money laundering; Privilege (computing); Law; Professional conduct; Position (finance); Confidentiality; Commission; Business; Order (exchange); Legal profession; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.032096614025555255,"score_gpt":0.3345268899074748,"score_spread":0.30243027588191956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483718433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86832637,0.002482548,0.00075556134,0.015128782,0.0020559218,0.0008504159,0.000037949852,0.00006117826,0.11030129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897092,0.00003967815,0.00015428192,0.00063693,0.00021215921,0.000007720864,0.0000026966534,0.0000066938055,0.009230648],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998016,0.00038925515,0.00058955746,0.00025013584,0.0004160919,0.00033898302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986027,0.0003715457,0.00042788277,0.00032489974,0.00019614313,0.00007681488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002105909,0.00010077298,0.00022128032,0.000013552374,0.00040050058,0.00017425959,0.00029983468,0.00007180126,0.0005924604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039491444,0.00006270935,0.00009632421,0.00020680553,0.00064448884,0.00010195522,0.00021817058,0.00015976936,0.000029857416],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009746829,0.00007284008,0.04097949,0.000032491786,0.00005090299,0.00002809489,0.9156397,0.000010648334,0.0010623528,0.016072856,0.01961824,0.006334923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037419636,0.000025495541,0.0040901955,0.00008356034,0.00007243035,0.0000021570197,0.054217696,0.00006986299,0.016258368,0.0021219987,0.92238367,0.00030034242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020717655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021853682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90276545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049872637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014840058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64870256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485343341","doi":"10.25071/1920-7336.21261","title":"Interpretation Consistent with International Law? The Detention of Asylum Seekers in South Africa","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Refuge Canada s Journal on Refuge","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Political science; International law; Interpretation (philosophy); Accountability; Refugee; Government (linguistics); International human rights law","score_opus":0.017813356632237234,"score_gpt":0.2522633168598194,"score_spread":0.23444996022758216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485343341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9656228,0.00089295296,0.000138071,0.0023328343,0.001361475,0.00031489035,0.000033799144,0.000023024306,0.029280169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975206,0.000028227689,0.00019408211,0.00059173605,0.00015051743,0.000007218828,0.00000179484,0.00001384886,0.0014919483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755144,0.00033089326,0.000433858,0.00017870447,0.0011779725,0.0003271137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988809,0.00012606382,0.0004071865,0.00018230414,0.00024352022,0.00015998044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006345832,0.00013274666,0.00019428293,0.00012187684,0.00029971855,0.00009944056,0.0004598606,0.00006929579,0.0004122268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023680758,0.00009040066,0.00007636244,0.0003477474,0.00028581556,0.0002083558,0.000029136827,0.0004487691,0.000008996758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070590834,0.0003658703,0.009404397,0.00004103693,0.000452779,0.0007199698,0.05566829,0.0021747625,0.00014867097,0.92647576,0.0011498947,0.002692638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005080537,0.00010934986,0.00060807227,0.00014464573,0.000023847291,0.000012111069,0.00063868036,0.0003825172,0.000038785987,0.00026972147,0.99712604,0.00013817598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027548366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0665169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99597615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00097245694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032520876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95051676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485560714","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v33i3.12130","title":"PROTECTING A WIFE FINANCIALLY AT THE TIME OF DIVORCE – A COMPARISON BETWEEN SOUTH AFRICAN WOMEN MARRIED IN TERMS OF SOUTH AFRICAN CIVIL LAW AND ISLAMIC LAW, WITH SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO THE MAHR","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wife; Islam; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Sharia; Family law; Marriage law; Sociology; Property (philosophy); Political science; Public law; History","score_opus":0.023699945893548076,"score_gpt":0.26153280056410455,"score_spread":0.23783285467055648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485560714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8194871,0.00007352301,0.000039625498,0.00080348016,0.000029310162,0.000674113,0.00009254061,0.000024515297,0.1787758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970015,0.0000012239293,0.0002789421,0.00018008288,0.00009810274,0.000078731384,0.000003602945,0.000021735203,0.0023360793],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975462,0.0005434584,0.00041349218,0.00041452327,0.00056903716,0.0005132919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865556,0.00033591385,0.00030308278,0.000519668,0.000098342105,0.00008741441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011425455,0.00018849655,0.0004628573,0.000051596144,0.00043268508,0.00010597361,0.0005249807,0.00009452404,0.0001673302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001601202,0.000117411495,0.000045331395,0.00082939083,0.0009723374,0.00009847324,0.0003793865,0.00033763447,0.000027977187],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014099073,0.000036971724,0.029905943,0.00003261788,0.00003001919,0.000007966169,0.95967066,0.000022495451,0.0006402706,0.009085536,0.000060884468,0.00036561655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038990853,0.0016132243,0.10751838,0.0013628276,0.00022492386,0.0000075089215,0.4164976,0.00008239345,0.008781064,0.011793864,0.4459495,0.0022696592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002387463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021795694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5431731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016893909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011025834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486401540","doi":"","title":"E-mail Communication for Provisional Sentence Summons","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of international commercial law and technology","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Summons; Law; Sentence; Statutory law; Legislation; Formality; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03855691653878103,"score_gpt":0.33199140144463163,"score_spread":0.2934344849058506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486401540","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19649407,0.0029763684,0.005212565,0.08447526,0.0040774425,0.0008122066,0.000085181935,0.00018598599,0.7056809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848589,0.0001666776,0.014195636,0.00032525143,0.00020177945,0.000007702158,0.0000019834856,0.000005912265,0.00023618854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918526,0.000056572535,0.0002998847,0.00008031171,0.00024202341,0.00013592838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863917,0.00016610205,0.0002763567,0.00010718243,0.0007529525,0.000058213896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057511806,0.000064091546,0.00014041299,0.00016570982,0.00033548812,0.00003397901,0.0006791192,0.00013540727,0.00007955199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049901655,0.000057682915,0.000056536344,0.00012860153,0.0007039905,0.00027648872,0.00011669795,0.00023360465,0.000003962498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064929736,0.000097548014,0.004511843,0.0000018252047,0.000033534117,0.0000038060623,0.003613447,1.05108036e-7,0.000051870564,0.9871479,0.0008558651,0.003617272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005120601,0.00019552822,0.0009300552,0.000044549688,0.000023126313,0.000021983182,0.0023360285,0.000016713164,0.0003838368,0.14709881,0.8483366,0.00010074241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044845804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001192306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8474807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060962288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008920349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25938824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488068905","doi":"","title":"Promoting Equality, Black Economic Empowerment, and the Future of Investment Rules","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Negotiation; Context (archaeology); Empowerment; Investment (military); Foreign direct investment; Political science; Promotion (chess); International trade; Economics; Development economics; Economic growth; Political economy; International economics; Law; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.008378454535069838,"score_gpt":0.29005831642055735,"score_spread":0.2816798618854875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488068905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9611379,0.0032432768,0.00002528487,0.008006247,0.0006354274,0.00025610917,0.000003073786,0.00001866058,0.026674047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995913,0.0017037144,0.00009046913,0.00012571308,0.0012335252,0.0000033808726,5.225052e-7,0.000010056078,0.0009196113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979096,0.00031492533,0.0002881358,0.00013688121,0.00025111664,0.0010993397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931085,0.00010618211,0.00028810624,0.00015311642,0.000045385146,0.000096377575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059902817,0.000099447156,0.00017674502,0.000038499962,0.0004578441,0.00011125261,0.00042002666,0.00008917964,0.00006798706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010579537,0.0000666801,0.00008133769,0.00006256904,0.00093304797,0.0001838117,0.00007903146,0.0014272651,0.000021686512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002085246,0.000016723114,0.0014111552,0.0000033159013,0.000051047668,2.7088055e-7,0.07445749,5.568135e-7,0.00007304027,0.92064434,0.00004252288,0.0032786636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000991173,0.00008763274,0.00023681049,0.000009695269,0.000038971848,0.000017895387,0.029115567,0.000040259292,0.000073752984,0.86490434,0.10435154,0.00013233599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049207115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0085344175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10430902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032083562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016468577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6200836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491810477","doi":"","title":"Doctrinal reform and post-contractual modifications in New Brunswick: Nav Canada v. Greater Fredricton Airport Authority Inc.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond University Research Portal (Bond University)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law; Public administration; Political science","score_opus":0.030728555104739496,"score_gpt":0.2906812519680911,"score_spread":0.2599526968633516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491810477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5952958,0.00002032946,0.0000069187813,0.0024232778,0.00015438627,0.0003382715,0.000070718925,0.000055440214,0.40163487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8866317,0.00004115221,0.00030197966,0.000030188701,0.00012001405,1.02959746e-7,0.00003185408,0.000009806643,0.112833165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968933,0.00023118756,0.00019313513,0.0006200578,0.0010897144,0.00097263523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976789,0.00018532065,0.000108193395,0.00045880434,0.00056785124,0.001000929],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009600137,0.00020960717,0.00027664044,0.0008759186,0.0015372962,0.000109266875,0.000995379,0.00034205898,0.00044584402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002760386,0.00025022283,0.0000705064,0.001743688,0.0010481786,0.0010946244,0.00043316247,0.0014856406,0.000022597402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035769935,0.00017415851,0.07043051,0.000017645274,0.000060247243,0.0042024306,0.022919683,0.0000020451903,0.0004144249,0.8865592,0.014021403,0.0008405506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010152371,0.000075931166,0.076233774,0.000014688375,0.00003085822,0.000007761539,0.061748926,0.000018537234,0.00006596596,0.00028179676,0.8601412,0.00036528235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96536285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9915231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88627744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012328621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012871014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501446081","doi":"10.1080/00083968.2013.765279","title":"Apartheid vertigo: the rise in discrimination against Africans in South Africa","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vertigo; History; Geography; Political science; Development economics; Ethnology; Medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.042385470238760874,"score_gpt":0.2656439224648627,"score_spread":0.2232584522261018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501446081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9315529,0.020504536,0.000013781999,0.009565441,0.0011840846,0.000984095,0.00006158521,0.00003137726,0.03610222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99733907,0.0003946727,0.00042367293,0.00015996334,0.0004909862,0.00013149802,0.0000016115833,0.0000553368,0.0010031642],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950061,0.0007815998,0.0012978574,0.00047969958,0.00039891945,0.0020358122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952686,0.00085672707,0.0006663142,0.00051951094,0.0012324093,0.0014564508],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024201828,0.00046452595,0.0009445847,0.0013403599,0.0010074242,0.00028670672,0.0015981724,0.00018161815,0.000089158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006454595,0.00036858913,0.00026381257,0.0034306997,0.0025243536,0.00083562074,0.00009716344,0.0007402127,0.000029097782],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002026015,0.000049227114,0.026409997,0.000056603625,0.0001300146,0.00044364002,0.9566943,0.00034356592,0.000024086296,0.01168709,0.0012158711,0.002925362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006527323,0.00020594394,0.019656615,0.0004695832,0.00008716845,0.000015503261,0.6645772,0.00008581231,0.0000049172795,0.006302518,0.3073268,0.0006152326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07899203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9013105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82231843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003806079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015652326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1503997350","doi":"10.1057/palgrave.pm.5940180","title":"Alternative dispute resolution in the South African pension funds industry: An Ombudsman or a Tribunal?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pensions An International Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Pension; Jurisdiction; Dispute resolution; Law; Business; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.09769182420107722,"score_gpt":0.40027791841640825,"score_spread":0.302586094215331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1503997350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9656814,0.000052566913,0.0008913617,0.010498225,0.001829729,0.00028198885,0.000035668756,0.000059112965,0.02067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99428123,0.00015221992,0.00072446774,0.0009867529,0.0026821468,0.000013605476,0.00002456341,0.000019926983,0.0011150816],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99571264,0.0012284676,0.0004961099,0.00035663805,0.001664416,0.00054173765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980443,0.00024278183,0.00033773071,0.00032707548,0.0006692468,0.00037883274],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025886649,0.00019213092,0.00020181769,0.00041026194,0.0010534488,0.0007469732,0.001623078,0.00021585597,0.00100044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011463822,0.00013054593,0.00010930008,0.00070693734,0.00033691677,0.0014954396,0.00013773829,0.0013371645,0.00005696018],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002169777,0.0019254404,0.090843834,0.000002441267,0.0001764879,0.004144708,0.77226526,0.0024264376,0.0001137366,0.103031,0.0040442096,0.018856637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030178046,0.001041171,0.14540279,0.00023253924,0.00008034362,0.0010364901,0.15308449,0.010075648,0.00002085236,0.020983543,0.66410613,0.00091821986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042759203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007915392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6600619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040048797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038613402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504007968","doi":"","title":"Die rekeningkundige erkenning van bates en verwante uitgawe deur niewinsgewende organisasies met verwysing na die NG Gemeentes in die Vrystaat","year":2008,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Christian Scholarship = Tydskrif vir Christelike Wetenskap","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Profit (economics); Business; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.05141962110380009,"score_gpt":0.3313686405080862,"score_spread":0.27994901940428607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504007968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86931884,0.109475486,0.0009546562,0.0018813874,0.0099314395,0.0024132794,0.00060686964,0.0006018973,0.0048161196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9680911,0.010337482,0.008559592,0.000647368,0.0059853615,0.00009663703,0.00012666397,0.0006304956,0.0055253017],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800633,0.0035373745,0.004586966,0.0026541827,0.004085329,0.005072847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98747337,0.003818614,0.0032251684,0.0016908856,0.0018011195,0.0019908207],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010265136,0.002402083,0.003289416,0.0018376294,0.0087788105,0.0034142495,0.0041752732,0.0018019901,0.0003430617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009377374,0.002476653,0.002299036,0.0021492657,0.0022649078,0.005057346,0.0011253207,0.006790294,0.00051737507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003949365,0.002520017,0.33885527,0.002240402,0.0035702814,0.01742135,0.578333,0.0010178738,0.021818005,0.0006156907,0.01724686,0.012411902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0100052785,0.0024460135,0.03379137,0.0062274467,0.002299999,0.0011872909,0.06457207,0.00051079603,0.007755723,0.004686115,0.86008286,0.0064350087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022480616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016332321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.842836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003610081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020622094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507481612","doi":"","title":"Sex Discrimination, Accountability of Public Authorities, And the Public/Private Divide in Tort Law: An Analysis of Doe V. Metropolitan Toronto (Municipality) Commissioners of Police","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Accountability; Political science; Metropolitan area; Private law; Duty; Public law; Liability","score_opus":0.026372047064541618,"score_gpt":0.33954178063106283,"score_spread":0.3131697335665212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507481612","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9580254,0.0039686356,0.00012283027,0.0016958321,0.00004946147,0.00020563132,0.000026387976,0.000014689486,0.035891116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99734783,0.0018542119,0.000060999104,0.00003152963,0.000076898155,0.0000056359877,0.0000065149875,0.000010331307,0.0006060217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949956,0.0018439944,0.00085206126,0.00022082205,0.00084186916,0.0012456522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998245,0.00034120394,0.00043702067,0.00047990872,0.00030715927,0.00018972269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012033194,0.00015048971,0.0006123657,0.00023029935,0.00037332665,0.00009935251,0.00094425614,0.00012151834,0.00031023618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004954024,0.00011020769,0.00019652527,0.0012240055,0.0016757092,0.0012128752,0.00008568269,0.000589399,2.1304434e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005043739,0.00016024838,0.043424066,0.000008661456,0.00033077016,1.08479114e-7,0.06312001,0.0000069442685,0.000013625574,0.8893421,0.0000025326394,0.0035404675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023575907,0.00039140388,0.03240814,0.0000380171,0.0011346819,0.0000047807503,0.62659204,0.00042529326,0.00010481118,0.3102905,0.025767028,0.0004857481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43976337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69159406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5790517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025247058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012796094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6602018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508301403","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4500","title":"A Wavering Commitment? Administrative Independence and Collaborative Governance in Ontario’s Adjudicative Tribunals Accountability Legislation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Statute; Legislation; Independence (probability theory); Corporate governance; Public administration; Legislature; Political science; Transparency (behavior); Government (linguistics); Law; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.05378763993765281,"score_gpt":0.37590865109594346,"score_spread":0.32212101115829067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508301403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8754204,0.00010975338,0.00008852586,0.0009575376,0.0003573463,0.0011233006,0.00006709066,0.000030296354,0.12184575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968996,0.000016649396,0.0021868173,0.0001306023,0.00010437821,0.0000745867,0.0000023794282,0.000010585966,0.0005744105],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980086,0.00018713369,0.0003862355,0.0004205881,0.00067069556,0.00032671925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99823,0.00056513725,0.0003270334,0.00029048655,0.00041014963,0.00017720717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010606217,0.00016641697,0.00031611376,0.00008043256,0.00020441815,0.0001787162,0.0006116586,0.0001821978,0.00043764655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016798388,0.00017666616,0.000029724983,0.00062772253,0.00053663854,0.0015764947,0.0002298768,0.00058810366,0.000015909043],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006084229,0.0003881752,0.34311467,0.00008599284,0.00006694309,0.000016283491,0.5981036,0.00007420034,0.0015771601,0.052898247,0.00031486526,0.0027514251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009232204,0.00019135298,0.93144935,0.00016618686,0.00010318205,6.707791e-7,0.012280886,0.000034953846,0.002763307,0.0026393104,0.04899996,0.00044758723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08916053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59436524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5883347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033976487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010499412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9169048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508647693","doi":"","title":"Emerging trends among the South African inmate population and persons subject to community corrections","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta criminologica","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Demography; Quarter (Canadian coin); Prison; Prison population; Psychology; Geography; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.07039650726743392,"score_gpt":0.335052983389006,"score_spread":0.2646564761215721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508647693","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9249722,0.00006561651,0.000022824386,0.0061673853,0.00020024298,0.00015532099,0.000011449702,0.00022535767,0.068179645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968334,0.00001013534,0.00035637885,0.0003382776,0.0001993702,0.000033452045,0.000005876585,0.000010403953,0.0022127102],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983289,0.0006535276,0.00017250888,0.00020018122,0.00023631327,0.00040856304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990753,0.00029122998,0.00009837065,0.00034730037,0.000047300146,0.00014048432],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006575522,0.00013370159,0.00015912995,0.0001381816,0.002888945,0.00016155685,0.00045115332,0.000113087255,0.00022798679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006418369,0.00009806962,0.0000563439,0.0005324777,0.00043031792,0.000300724,0.00018489205,0.00044919166,0.000026279044],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015530522,0.000052673535,0.053112347,0.0000022783784,0.000016794886,9.420783e-7,0.9105389,0.000032469998,0.000054064705,0.0015885517,0.0012233449,0.033362072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015966143,0.00010995011,0.5103422,0.000011649032,0.00007635743,0.0000013076253,0.29233563,0.000102591424,0.000027844595,0.00028921876,0.19624676,0.0002968684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018083246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014074531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61820334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001301299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019056253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99840915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510579985","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v32i1.12319","title":"AT LAST A SOUTH AFRICAN PROPER LAW OF DELICT Burchell v Anglin 2010 3 SA 48 (ECG)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Delict; Law; Common law; Locus (genetics); Haploinsufficiency; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Comparative law; Private law; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.027810237544735033,"score_gpt":0.2834699522834022,"score_spread":0.25565971473866717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510579985","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31175613,0.00092154334,0.00004205321,0.0011068308,0.0007421137,0.0002569987,0.00006810246,0.000099379904,0.68500686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91746575,0.000005862156,0.0015138636,0.0004953468,0.0003192961,0.000014420879,0.000008557246,0.000021583777,0.08015532],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983218,0.00022496989,0.0002463378,0.00032144823,0.00047259204,0.00041287977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902123,0.00007501047,0.00009979687,0.00038687818,0.00025164208,0.00016544189],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036147225,0.00013184208,0.00022979922,0.000036809324,0.00022888907,0.00007252536,0.00031113435,0.00014481928,0.00223002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018309917,0.00011358894,0.00012293014,0.00041294534,0.0005416447,0.00014664288,0.00021556701,0.00017578818,0.0010224447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008699568,0.0003100279,0.032825436,0.00007712163,0.00010100316,0.00017538531,0.9057592,0.000011965177,0.007270083,0.019874701,0.03149773,0.0020103597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002589061,0.000025645972,0.00038484274,0.000026440499,0.000025712672,0.0000013056309,0.0053790845,0.000012894626,0.005330284,0.00019176197,0.988169,0.00019411785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010002119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023554857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9566713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106119944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015248469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512343341","doi":"","title":"Consent and Coercion in the Law of Rape in South Africa: A Feminist Transformative Approach","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Transformative learning; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Gender studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04301952484605037,"score_gpt":0.2970025262024348,"score_spread":0.2539830013563844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512343341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7886379,0.00055138784,6.372942e-7,0.0007986724,0.0001186329,0.0004188508,0.000044157587,0.000008042065,0.20942175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992356,0.000022128463,0.00007437834,0.00039643634,0.000033953405,0.00010661309,7.3369637e-7,0.000004922621,0.00012523879],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884725,0.00017573463,0.00019954419,0.0001489207,0.00019336885,0.00043521213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993492,0.00029336195,0.000049088732,0.00011782348,0.000047270627,0.0001432626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010529901,0.00010047157,0.00023740105,0.0001265845,0.00030559598,0.00003358483,0.00021488962,0.000070772236,0.000012757796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002718951,0.000076272714,0.000020637293,0.00043260216,0.0016566298,0.00009643069,0.000018839582,0.0002554892,0.0000031433663],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056753406,0.000014320271,0.0017895444,0.000020538346,0.00001303204,0.0000065454906,0.8901651,4.3921622e-7,0.0000035544463,0.10790711,0.00003467877,0.00003947309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026145278,0.00002784979,0.0003987407,0.000013927628,0.000005717924,4.2543007e-7,0.9569408,0.000003420899,0.000004080879,0.0023396197,0.03990669,0.000097255244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009483006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38287905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37339604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019196118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003029465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99711293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512674864","doi":"","title":"Interdicts seeking to preserve constitutional rights - of losing litigants, interim interdicts pending appeal, and lessons from Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Interim; Political science; Constitution; High Court; Government (linguistics); Status quo; Legislation; Supreme court; Position (finance); Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.029423678572347813,"score_gpt":0.3192401797264142,"score_spread":0.28981650115406643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512674864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7182095,0.000982991,0.017538046,0.0023285472,0.0030999032,0.00041937223,0.00045616296,0.00008427501,0.25688118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967855,0.0000031794932,0.0019742562,0.00026373903,0.00086401467,0.0000019641454,0.000005167537,0.00001618263,0.00008598191],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969252,0.0002592084,0.0006911409,0.0003575683,0.0009764827,0.00079041783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99767584,0.00052887923,0.0004214792,0.00021107591,0.0002677631,0.00089498935],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001461411,0.00023279022,0.0004134795,0.00018993451,0.0015150557,0.0002942227,0.0006384844,0.00011609147,0.00027428273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005899992,0.00021898132,0.00009835959,0.00038345327,0.0015844883,0.00041080767,0.00034162457,0.00059734366,0.0000072275243],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038314512,0.00011826132,0.026500136,0.00004424653,0.0004142815,0.0007959465,0.6149119,0.000053092615,0.001161669,0.35096306,0.002132887,0.0025213533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025460771,0.00041064748,0.0075607155,0.0033852516,0.00032425573,0.00015528391,0.3108619,0.000099797144,0.0045950185,0.021254051,0.6469487,0.0018583216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46845043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6764623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6448158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068547524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007125733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513219015","doi":"","title":"From Delgamuukw to Ritchersveld - are land claims in Canadian and South African law comparable?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review = Stellenbosch Regstydskrif","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033766206916251665,"score_gpt":0.31571966634487525,"score_spread":0.2819534594286236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513219015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058183234,0.20609206,0.000029585282,0.047042966,0.0010486683,0.005197601,0.00058114575,0.00047347991,0.68135124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9705125,0.011235271,0.0026603707,0.011389285,0.0011651794,0.00018423323,0.000040346742,0.00012387909,0.0026889485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99220914,0.0011896052,0.0013433357,0.0015951181,0.0012624441,0.0024003312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99470615,0.0005847216,0.00040711148,0.0013699216,0.00028554336,0.0026465778],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025939022,0.00079949584,0.0017282015,0.0003099831,0.0011840735,0.0004250475,0.0014688636,0.0005523309,0.0012668987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038236153,0.0008265145,0.00026685928,0.0016275127,0.0009935134,0.00078858377,0.0003167289,0.0010890935,0.0015009227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004272824,0.0010017495,0.080461115,0.003054409,0.0006461881,0.0007376936,0.3627928,0.00028311266,0.00004314914,0.42212084,0.08357012,0.04486154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007805848,0.000076033866,0.0005367753,0.002352164,0.00011955814,0.000003759239,0.0040908763,0.00004570187,0.000022355624,0.000714541,0.99024355,0.0010140925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7094756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91619706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91232926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009433551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068973197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513770463","doi":"10.1080/02255189.2007.9669185","title":"The Big-Push Approach to African Development and Local Capacity Building: Understanding the Issues","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développement","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Capacity building; Poverty reduction; Poverty; Local Development; Political science; Economic growth; Environmental planning; Business; Regional science; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.13528584232179847,"score_gpt":0.29406335789773413,"score_spread":0.15877751557593567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513770463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86088693,0.010019276,0.033916574,0.06910544,0.0057313247,0.002136583,0.000012779048,0.00006593427,0.018125176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806482,0.00020817718,0.017519945,0.00067385356,0.00046901708,0.00003998321,0.000001266994,0.000037440375,0.00040209576],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99561805,0.00021671192,0.0012151307,0.00045036548,0.0005573322,0.0019424224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955953,0.0005910671,0.00047198092,0.00030466163,0.00079247117,0.0022445638],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008960919,0.00042948965,0.0005552873,0.00049757445,0.0060627316,0.0003546885,0.0012767024,0.00012321083,0.000010625503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001332416,0.00030453096,0.00009068828,0.0011415272,0.0013441051,0.00016555536,0.00020043789,0.0004912837,0.0000068210625],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033462453,0.000031389067,0.0055419663,0.000044424876,0.00072493585,0.00013599248,0.83557665,0.00006721372,0.0000054261204,0.1296904,0.0031308404,0.025017327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025930288,0.00005241997,0.0063946852,0.00012879228,0.000042616666,0.000030232577,0.29560107,0.0000027589454,0.00007245391,0.0009541358,0.6960842,0.0003773554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012903648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8463915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83348787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0128750205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049490444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513938139","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v34i2.12036","title":"CURRENT ISSUES OF CONSTITUTIONAL DAMAGES LITIGATION: A CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS OF RECENT COMMONWEALTH DECISIONS","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Commonwealth; Law; Plaintiff; Supreme court; Political science; Charter; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.07882269416384635,"score_gpt":0.4100255463537328,"score_spread":0.33120285218988643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513938139","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6572206,0.03455545,0.0060159056,0.014945137,0.002402727,0.0006549937,0.0014984801,0.00012529561,0.28258142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99695694,0.0008472304,0.0013477317,0.000095300806,0.000094654606,0.000005257075,0.00008274454,0.0000026588286,0.00056746585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984647,0.00028344817,0.0003674671,0.00017218123,0.0005517382,0.00016046333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982689,0.00049392023,0.0001607934,0.0002459265,0.00073012855,0.00010034001],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045062532,0.000070573464,0.00030393756,0.00013462224,0.00015690227,0.000029723797,0.00018692618,0.00005582506,0.0032529936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010753571,0.00006686595,0.0001401692,0.0013125036,0.0012078739,0.000118585405,0.000075423864,0.00009620798,0.000019965966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025228594,0.00042705025,0.10319162,0.0000217329,0.00053557346,0.0000110578085,0.09905892,0.00009650741,0.00022313069,0.7723809,0.006924739,0.017103558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021328613,0.000018910883,0.01018497,0.000066998815,0.0002751314,2.4579322e-7,0.0042816964,0.00004677485,0.00079228246,0.0015640317,0.9824527,0.00010300795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025467898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006412834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97552794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006197648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044566704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521091668","doi":"10.71781/2051","title":"Les conjoints de fait au Québec : perspectives féministes pour un encadrement légal","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.009012687587170604,"score_gpt":0.21562016667569872,"score_spread":0.2066074790885281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1521091668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60927063,0.03085876,0.00018313724,0.0017462888,0.0011928105,0.0004618232,0.00009694724,0.00016298798,0.35602665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79727095,0.00019988568,0.0013442205,0.000049933806,0.000756263,0.000034849665,0.00013514118,0.00004422394,0.20016451],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953005,0.0005784819,0.0006312106,0.0010309131,0.0013951513,0.0010637487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973018,0.00030158984,0.0007200056,0.00043852738,0.0006467415,0.000591324],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004646094,0.000718614,0.0006374233,0.00030747318,0.017609013,0.00015028269,0.00096227345,0.00085542875,0.00051522633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026259574,0.0008684845,0.0005951414,0.00055967254,0.001722949,0.0005217659,0.0002181499,0.0007626335,0.00026524058],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030013287,0.000544042,0.070666075,0.0001162015,0.0004651752,0.0013664557,0.7421368,0.00058804016,0.002594293,0.1773704,0.0006141983,0.0032382137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011606117,0.00016330145,0.11201736,0.00034694525,0.0007526719,0.00013806424,0.6507906,0.00034466828,0.0049792626,0.00088050583,0.22725794,0.0011680778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9258199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6137982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31202167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04722479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013093915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526298774","doi":"","title":"Contextualizing inclusive education : evaluating old and new international perspectives","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Equity (law); Inclusion (mineral); Globalization; Context (archaeology); Global education; Sociology; Political science; Comparative education; Gender studies; Social science; Higher education; Pedagogy; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.0476763407526239,"score_gpt":0.42379584369117257,"score_spread":0.3761195029385487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526298774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007046383,0.0064264718,0.0000677548,0.0053002853,0.00091013865,0.00035860584,0.0000064673663,0.00009755907,0.9867622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0134893535,0.0003292519,0.004457935,0.00058004877,0.0062980284,0.000011448203,0.000020866519,0.000024649993,0.9747884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829227,0.00011177796,0.00024243777,0.0004000096,0.00074609753,0.00020740852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876034,0.00026697654,0.00022699237,0.00014775922,0.0004216065,0.00017634923],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005570063,0.0001803164,0.00020714116,0.00015056247,0.00039751158,0.000245799,0.00037948566,0.0002548784,0.003259215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012053086,0.00018659388,0.00006503747,0.00006767849,0.00030387673,0.00034256923,0.00023117283,0.00029787386,0.00013316856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004590858,0.000016076337,0.000030376144,0.00000403862,0.00003800633,5.0280767e-7,0.4026614,6.972073e-7,0.0000021323638,0.46389124,0.0670243,0.06632663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013541397,0.000018381683,0.00001703173,0.000107252534,0.00003404149,6.4608827e-7,0.059387255,0.000018969884,0.0000010942164,0.019213835,0.9208533,0.00021276137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030430935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016628656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.853829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014908628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041812235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99765193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527372535","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v25i2.4614","title":"I CAN SEE CLEARLY NOW: VIDEOCONFERENCE HEARINGS AND THE LEGAL LIMIT ON HOW TRIBUNALS ALLOCATE RESOURCES","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Limit (mathematics); Videoconferencing; Political science; Law; Business; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics; Telecommunications; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04114657717530011,"score_gpt":0.3268015283295251,"score_spread":0.28565495115422496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1527372535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7018924,0.00045135326,0.00022684074,0.048301943,0.0005045377,0.0012198073,0.000021586486,0.00014455238,0.24723701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98934317,0.000044311717,0.0002873668,0.0018814007,0.0005890121,0.000016427924,6.676677e-7,0.00002455415,0.007813116],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975837,0.00024250601,0.00031739584,0.00040876403,0.000853516,0.00059412146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976148,0.0012140484,0.00021290946,0.00040348506,0.00024827637,0.00030645553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002491323,0.00019858227,0.0003521882,0.00016058415,0.0004680163,0.00073748996,0.0011811253,0.00014934842,0.00008223359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017668019,0.0001540682,0.00007730898,0.00050025986,0.00096358504,0.00045899095,0.00033021948,0.00037209457,0.00006306353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0060953447,0.00041138625,0.017617693,0.0004941322,0.0003605367,0.00016233315,0.65877074,0.00032848938,0.0016790241,0.27021977,0.020158155,0.023702368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020594145,0.0003958521,0.048235573,0.00031648966,0.00038934936,0.0000028504123,0.017388009,0.000070087146,0.0027225886,0.0013559577,0.9263927,0.00067113375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006177109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029648058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90623456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000078235724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014262511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9337983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529279683","doi":"","title":"State v. Zuma: The Future of Constitutional Democracy in South Africa","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Presidency; Democracy; Victory; Constitutionalism; Independence (probability theory); Law; Political science; State (computer science); Judicial independence; Rule of law; Constitutional law; Constitutional review; Separation of powers; Freedom of the press; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.009206684646540755,"score_gpt":0.2723809467700299,"score_spread":0.26317426212348916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1529279683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5095725,0.12889194,0.011050375,0.0688674,0.002913756,0.001392931,0.00004613541,0.00019787478,0.2770671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964901,0.0010703751,0.00009955183,0.00010022009,0.00062033837,0.0000013322655,5.567006e-7,0.0000044592393,0.0016130687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970221,0.0002911554,0.00031623946,0.00013439778,0.0005682441,0.0016678993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993679,0.00008672636,0.00020678705,0.00013260091,0.00012395353,0.00008203102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027030872,0.00010788934,0.00016716013,0.000096747055,0.0005737227,0.0000560591,0.00054662663,0.000077978584,0.00006368627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016910414,0.000075924,0.00009876625,0.00051601586,0.0006593759,0.00022853383,0.00002123098,0.0016109085,0.00002826838],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038823036,0.000047602243,0.0018344431,7.45676e-7,0.000022348338,0.0000056598983,0.07476644,0.00006515614,0.000016629036,0.91501504,0.00013606266,0.008051055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050347956,0.00011895745,0.0009601492,0.000014622237,0.000016491067,0.00001948097,0.03292133,0.000009727961,0.00001139108,0.85706836,0.10821808,0.00013792519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000532012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009793645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48691761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007509085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046245805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8203807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541669179","doi":"","title":"R v. Sinclair: Balancing Individual Rights and Societal Interests Outside of Section 1 of the Charter","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Charter; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Business","score_opus":0.012095356520733977,"score_gpt":0.2832377083204115,"score_spread":0.27114235179967755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541669179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918567,0.0023065102,0.00019302766,0.00035849639,0.00067546224,0.0000932142,0.0000027511096,0.000011237456,0.0045026275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983855,0.000082917686,0.000037017817,0.000022321841,0.00078438426,9.851184e-7,2.9735588e-7,0.0000067368387,0.00067984266],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800265,0.00022809609,0.00022983989,0.00007829685,0.00041808852,0.0010430353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945056,0.00006374246,0.00025053864,0.00009263929,0.000070532,0.000071995026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002219779,0.00007965615,0.00013958702,0.00004305837,0.00036983725,0.000025611678,0.00025877662,0.00009175819,0.000027772798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000915248,0.00005419639,0.000103525585,0.00015922276,0.00029684714,0.00033546062,0.00006860619,0.0008551561,0.0000026549217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000485724,0.00019123222,0.24517065,0.000023609673,0.00044614726,5.727028e-7,0.53806543,0.0000030865958,0.002591594,0.20339729,0.00062290375,0.00943892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003541361,0.0013320768,0.15653156,0.00041861992,0.00077908393,0.0003829417,0.15544921,0.00005429717,0.010803117,0.56615937,0.10337251,0.0011758573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056408404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002846692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38261622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003364189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005299571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37152752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542062513","doi":"10.21991/c9hm16","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM IN SOUTH AFRICA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography; Development economics; Economics","score_opus":0.05168537418911047,"score_gpt":0.2833531090796398,"score_spread":0.23166773489052933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542062513","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021016465,0.001858803,0.027052352,0.0015597828,0.003113937,0.00099328,0.00034736207,0.00049539376,0.96247745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927356,0.00004155302,0.004614243,0.0006357826,0.00030195873,0.00019616575,0.00006938397,0.000013498958,0.0013918059],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99484545,0.00022912085,0.0010336018,0.0009009506,0.0012171605,0.0017737034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977907,0.00017015915,0.0003062335,0.00058225705,0.00051924,0.0006313902],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011353965,0.0005143001,0.00055947044,0.00048455223,0.0024241891,0.00014456324,0.0009979042,0.0005269462,0.002276907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011068058,0.0005267245,0.00032335726,0.001350342,0.0336838,0.0015539557,0.0003062218,0.0006988269,0.0016411175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010886791,0.0002477716,0.033508856,0.000010665144,0.000051235358,0.0001321726,0.018226475,0.000045139106,0.000012777742,0.9466491,0.0007257971,0.00028117708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021695371,0.000076181685,0.00093092,0.00021422512,0.00006145933,0.00006283178,0.032015283,0.00008367634,0.00012940381,0.06246225,0.90069664,0.0010975881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012367682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014627443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99063396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019357532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041784737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545795616","doi":"","title":"The right to address the court in the language of one's choice","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Codicillus","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Multiculturalism; Political science; Economic Justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.0256943357895385,"score_gpt":0.32546961414151826,"score_spread":0.29977527835197976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545795616","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14352725,0.0044096047,0.00002957524,0.017133731,0.00063278386,0.0008853333,0.000016275579,0.0000371532,0.8333283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951822,0.000033492102,0.000032725467,0.0010238667,0.00017287732,0.000036037633,4.2537596e-7,0.0000064817273,0.0035119038],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810666,0.0006956544,0.00017381176,0.00012742692,0.00058248796,0.0003139393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795866,0.0013976729,0.00006842475,0.0004571446,0.00006667669,0.000051407733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021845943,0.00007494092,0.00011151089,0.000022484654,0.00060941954,0.00008326887,0.0010250185,0.000053984168,0.00017103738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00221971,0.000034526573,0.000044760618,0.00054178614,0.00057463784,0.00004907607,0.000046920304,0.00020070313,0.00010283068],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013694261,0.00007703179,0.0018930389,0.0000055737974,0.000017894732,0.0000136657345,0.8007949,0.000023060213,0.00013591941,0.17770112,0.01732232,0.002001791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012179907,0.00002157778,0.0016023521,0.000014088796,0.000010641896,3.1592413e-7,0.0305507,0.00000294229,0.00026410236,0.00076044933,0.96658653,0.000064482265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038099904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012436107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9492642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058952166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000100746474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69396394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545819739","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1485","title":"Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium v. Minister of Justice: Sex Equality and the Attack on R. v. Butler","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Political science; Criminology","score_opus":0.05443311413666295,"score_gpt":0.35233492321334,"score_spread":0.297901809076677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545819739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0088172015,0.001752648,0.00006737939,0.0077038226,0.00042636206,0.00015811183,0.000007562009,0.000016873417,0.98105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97316235,0.00045483344,0.00022196145,0.0018009252,0.0005227335,0.000003048594,7.3475076e-7,0.000011883126,0.023821553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807465,0.00051983335,0.00035294332,0.00019059666,0.00053589954,0.00032608397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987882,0.00045091016,0.00023478048,0.00020826433,0.000100608035,0.00021726702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001878431,0.00013375595,0.0002626771,0.000027499173,0.0008127635,0.00022798018,0.00024793606,0.00010855269,0.0002623536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019576357,0.000091037284,0.00008325868,0.000091179616,0.0013584918,0.00025086262,0.00007742179,0.00034304635,0.00003478176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074912625,0.00021885442,0.004645722,0.00009206169,0.00016733767,0.000095164956,0.13122861,0.000019610183,0.0000577947,0.82687503,0.034093868,0.0017568102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013354204,0.00010661945,0.00042431158,0.000058999696,0.00012483943,0.00004635478,0.0058803502,0.000024007377,0.000039543516,0.008006393,0.9837782,0.00017497194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017075614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003815684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9643451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050057628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050661554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62512016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551700116","doi":"","title":"Feticide : creating a statutory crime in South African law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review = Stellenbosch Regstydskrif","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Jurisprudence; Law; Legislature; Abortion; Political science; Common law; Position (finance); Criminology; Sociology; Pregnancy; Business","score_opus":0.03016946507801467,"score_gpt":0.3170328084844136,"score_spread":0.28686334340639896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551700116","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033062703,0.118093215,0.00006070177,0.0026396688,0.0007690203,0.0044114674,0.000040260104,0.0005803234,0.87009907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9562711,0.015708493,0.0046215244,0.0067599737,0.0008305819,0.0008522429,0.000032318843,0.00022934636,0.014694377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884367,0.0026246586,0.0022254733,0.0017505729,0.0022222567,0.0027403357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940842,0.0012714083,0.00083155785,0.0019818812,0.0006701869,0.0011607953],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038627142,0.0010430589,0.001986628,0.00028909164,0.0015948176,0.0005959954,0.0021042547,0.00056990824,0.005850631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015282277,0.0009977885,0.00060842745,0.0020727804,0.0022148578,0.0016462404,0.0005748748,0.0015537783,0.0047894525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000546079,0.00048309466,0.0011535282,0.0025291815,0.00014719814,0.00013148112,0.097984076,0.000013066228,0.000101173224,0.87702703,0.010367333,0.010008218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082169584,0.00016529245,0.0001684249,0.0034824419,0.00015089236,0.000005216153,0.008528061,0.000031778247,0.00009147913,0.002192184,0.9831297,0.0012328252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03148251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002908949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97276235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069646304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065318466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551862032","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1019085","title":"Fragile Stability: Post-Apartheid South Africa","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.0171077049062973,"score_gpt":0.28253641187758183,"score_spread":0.2654287069712845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551862032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6504878,0.013300262,0.009644742,0.003475902,0.0015499478,0.00053123693,0.000015624893,0.00035694934,0.32063755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928566,0.00023096809,0.0002596735,0.00014261348,0.0012343352,0.0000028644183,0.0000014087368,0.000029712675,0.0052418136],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99337846,0.000291088,0.00042144334,0.00029374877,0.00091053784,0.0047047026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858207,0.00022080074,0.0002157695,0.0002871027,0.00033534036,0.00035890113],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010185859,0.00018825302,0.00023376512,0.0001417043,0.0010996711,0.00016179998,0.00071338814,0.00018337801,0.00059417816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093681336,0.00017123122,0.0001911866,0.00056073256,0.00037351245,0.00036936562,0.00006705132,0.0023136386,0.00036540587],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018966568,0.00018926075,0.0073389946,0.0000051891925,0.00016158533,0.0000306494,0.5214755,0.000005074666,0.000395054,0.4504673,0.00024004816,0.019501673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000598701,0.0003999941,0.0003466387,0.000013115039,0.000053429056,0.000029857469,0.20929608,0.0000043142604,0.00021382885,0.19382627,0.5947726,0.0004452193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034860556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057000066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5945325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018411056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003624947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553654399","doi":"10.1353/arw.2005.0125","title":"John S. Saul. The Next Liberation Struggle: Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy in Southern Africa. Toronto: Between the Lines/Scottsville: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press/New York: Monthly Review Press/London: The Merlin Press, 2005; 341 pp. Index. $21.95. Paper.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Studies Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Democracy; Socialism; Economic history; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; History; Law; Politics; Communism","score_opus":0.058068844010640566,"score_gpt":0.3158088508833773,"score_spread":0.25774000687273674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553654399","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038696395,0.96111727,0.00001129842,0.01349723,0.00023846496,0.003001816,0.0001503534,0.000070225964,0.02152638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08215153,0.91233706,0.0001126737,0.000782588,0.0007565576,0.0000463623,0.000014042502,0.000039792125,0.0037593774],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99436647,0.001783092,0.0010885011,0.0006415766,0.0012236595,0.00089668477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954427,0.0019804016,0.0009991026,0.0009473319,0.0004117692,0.00021868742],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049948855,0.0004956349,0.0012757122,0.000017061084,0.0015048162,0.00012560068,0.0016869215,0.00019767333,0.00015483174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014196754,0.0002912057,0.000301169,0.00063750887,0.0018231043,0.0006573462,0.00069463835,0.00061658036,0.000018895533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006171967,0.00011855998,0.00079076044,0.002654067,0.0008428509,0.000023014763,0.36728227,0.000009391479,0.0000022627378,0.0038693354,0.5279386,0.09640718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033162785,0.00003529282,0.00057578814,0.0018436442,0.000741755,8.922235e-7,0.03529312,0.000003983004,0.0000018868724,0.00032064744,0.9605174,0.00033393834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04793179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036867432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43257883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032612126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002959348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554917978","doi":"10.1080/00083968.2012.659577","title":"Cleaning the wharves: Pilferage, bribery, and social connections on the Durban docks in the 1950s","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); DOCK; Wage; Business; Resistance (ecology); Labour economics; Sociology; Demographic economics; Economics; Social science; Engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.06357483326005672,"score_gpt":0.2882485465159669,"score_spread":0.22467371325591015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554917978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89217395,0.012396383,0.0000047030767,0.06492551,0.0011868818,0.0005316433,0.000044636156,0.00001749672,0.02871881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958522,0.00027336084,0.000042188658,0.0013759681,0.0018099893,0.00004182197,6.487609e-7,0.000029419647,0.00057444087],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647874,0.001025438,0.0005934403,0.00023169711,0.0002967495,0.0013739384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952954,0.0028964567,0.00041792606,0.0003203259,0.00047532344,0.0005945331],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003988345,0.0002973407,0.00048708206,0.00032166316,0.0043223803,0.00035197494,0.001136225,0.00010105975,0.00004658237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040908316,0.0001691359,0.00018985255,0.0013706473,0.0026878738,0.00041892103,0.000065146545,0.0007580132,0.0000058209143],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013358274,0.00002296834,0.0071255406,0.00001831253,0.00017761097,0.000081933635,0.8230191,0.000014970904,0.0000030480815,0.1634799,0.0051462394,0.00089702365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014034208,0.0001021603,0.010272789,0.000080118865,0.00008781176,0.000065289925,0.5311145,0.0000021604524,9.1356e-7,0.0016237586,0.4563252,0.00018489311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050570562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8151228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76455224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001165574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051874574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555915201","doi":"","title":"Legitimizing Elections Through the Regulation of Campaign Financing: A Comparative Constitutional Analysis and Hope for South Africa","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College international and comparative law review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.12079174063485275,"score_gpt":0.3611035223263063,"score_spread":0.24031178169145356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555915201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039717242,0.14706562,0.0729588,0.0155216595,0.0009855998,0.007719431,0.0020788552,0.00016755487,0.71378523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99415356,0.0014615325,0.0021736356,0.000342201,0.00009715065,0.00017281818,0.000028270842,0.0000026704283,0.0015681514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985741,0.00023419375,0.00039800227,0.00025757155,0.0003757698,0.00016037309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984161,0.0005682812,0.00030275874,0.00011176492,0.00054791576,0.000053173797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000370626,0.0001401689,0.0004820132,0.00006042797,0.0011339623,0.00003503575,0.00018971655,0.00005701408,0.00008401014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000097363765,0.00010558359,0.0001501525,0.000681134,0.002069344,0.00029447908,0.000049252314,0.00013043564,0.000003386691],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003783062,0.000040617473,0.00029599972,0.00003351274,0.00028554705,6.3044484e-7,0.042743005,0.00006719995,0.000012898813,0.9538449,0.0026139647,0.000023894341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039124672,0.000065682165,0.0010052797,0.00029034453,0.00036600977,0.000007771755,0.0033303914,0.0006359339,0.00010800858,0.0051322565,0.9884803,0.0001867222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034846104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054310943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98586637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007384956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001773866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8721636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1562861504","doi":"10.25071/1920-7336.36486","title":"Addressing Xenophobia in the Equality Courts of South Africa","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Refuge Canada s Journal on Refuge","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Xenophobia; Racism; Refugee law; Political science; Inequality; Oppression; Law; State (computer science); Refugee; Human rights; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.07393147902492228,"score_gpt":0.3335000328272876,"score_spread":0.2595685538023653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1562861504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9869373,0.0010096797,0.000007645638,0.0011651338,0.0006007754,0.00029539395,0.00002398249,0.000015078318,0.009945027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99743634,0.00002147254,0.0001179453,0.0011738816,0.0003734506,0.000011238282,0.0000011700623,0.000018247838,0.0008462781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99552983,0.0011176433,0.0006504273,0.00022523837,0.001765341,0.00071150594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981873,0.00033546504,0.00051275536,0.0003975315,0.00024438454,0.0003225535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002222722,0.00018997579,0.00035455267,0.00012540071,0.00059793954,0.00020076208,0.00097652193,0.00013265344,0.0008394945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006807316,0.00012989632,0.000103829174,0.0005512323,0.00027957093,0.000270101,0.00005167793,0.0008358679,0.000027041715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021128842,0.0006470369,0.011183415,0.00015316842,0.00020121387,0.0011378594,0.13359343,0.00035670726,0.001087249,0.828504,0.019615978,0.0033086448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027508795,0.000053326483,0.0022433994,0.00011111342,0.000013292969,0.0000058330143,0.00070870016,0.000009870183,0.00008706957,0.0012371056,0.9950788,0.00017642426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025271041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023818886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9754628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079363864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016885436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564650852","doi":"","title":"Feminist Activism in the Supreme Court: Legal Mobilization and the Women's Legal Education and Action Fund","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Review of Canadian Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Politics; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.03457825904700046,"score_gpt":0.35763258022025857,"score_spread":0.3230543211732581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564650852","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4882208,0.296719,0.0000027718554,0.09304295,0.0003189062,0.0019326326,0.000020978709,0.000022003447,0.11971992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.938726,0.057479456,0.000017672182,0.002984124,0.00016427795,0.00014441767,0.0000013665658,0.0000060172106,0.00047665273],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841297,0.00071779196,0.00022441507,0.00013998609,0.00026158785,0.00024326274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890393,0.00049605337,0.00024488603,0.00020622027,0.000094812116,0.00005411623],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018116274,0.000104583196,0.00031363498,0.00009220312,0.00057980005,0.00007421921,0.00023078901,0.000015063836,0.000007221355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004356971,0.00005505597,0.00003080873,0.0009295214,0.002739164,0.00012254872,0.000029096342,0.00012548921,0.0000017285935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008400372,0.00010824088,0.008062323,0.0011416682,0.00018246639,0.0000052490504,0.43721458,0.000004852776,0.000012129542,0.34247807,0.043859076,0.16684735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000102352824,0.000030758998,0.0066735893,0.00023300765,0.000055085908,0.00000335811,0.1162628,0.0000020410591,0.0000011531962,0.0011452823,0.87540936,0.000081202335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.401356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39804128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8315503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020509603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003991001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568858494","doi":"10.20361/g2qp5z","title":"The Swazi People by R. Van der Wiel","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Deakin Review of Children s Literature","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Xhosa; Zulu; Tswana; Glossary; Indigenous; Dance; White (mutation); Publishing; History; Languages of Africa; Sociology; Anthropology; Media studies; Visual arts; Art; Linguistics; Literature","score_opus":0.004114645198647812,"score_gpt":0.27517910635752135,"score_spread":0.27106446115887356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568858494","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067942613,0.86612046,0.00010010027,0.03003318,0.00056853786,0.0014890936,0.00008751794,0.00011056994,0.09469629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94936776,0.03943253,0.00020802213,0.0060280478,0.0009233878,0.000049942853,0.00005742064,0.00003133703,0.003901571],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729407,0.0010597699,0.00038431626,0.00023693337,0.0006391539,0.0003857866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980471,0.0005325327,0.0002913944,0.0008314023,0.0002005169,0.00009706834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025308747,0.00018945076,0.00035615682,0.000017210574,0.0007893879,0.00021871288,0.0014148531,0.00012307007,0.00014894924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011286325,0.00009353447,0.0002077836,0.00073156186,0.00039769855,0.00016143781,0.00012091947,0.0004300647,0.000098523866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021323413,0.000086810935,0.0026961851,0.0008153643,0.00017303527,8.1888214e-7,0.06510359,0.0000010726438,0.000025315061,0.30218124,0.58990973,0.038985547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009032717,0.000017798817,0.00083286973,0.0015697591,0.0000696354,0.0000025711302,0.000044830562,0.0000015698229,0.000023289573,0.002242393,0.99497247,0.00013247598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018088044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007740031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9425735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024133638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054410564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6071414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1569953442","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1445006","title":"Book Review: Martin Chanock, The Making of South African Legal Culture, 1902-1936: Fear, Favour and Prejudice","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Prejudice (legal term); Legal culture; Criminology; Political science; Law; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.009476285357499458,"score_gpt":0.2897929634056076,"score_spread":0.28031667804810817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1569953442","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022817545,0.9068383,0.00039669295,0.030724436,0.00021868428,0.00058703363,0.0000049561177,0.000066105604,0.058882013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92334765,0.053282227,0.00008645672,0.005901928,0.00063752616,0.0000057162993,6.4790083e-7,0.000016890841,0.016720925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961749,0.00048814403,0.0004321363,0.00024853754,0.0007256191,0.0019307077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989743,0.00004589948,0.0004802748,0.00024185145,0.00016053689,0.000097143195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003578215,0.00019123015,0.00033407818,0.00006670884,0.0008071913,0.00013060567,0.00066369097,0.00010107564,0.00011374385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004121478,0.00013284343,0.00015607374,0.0004587486,0.00029937108,0.0003673267,0.000060458307,0.0016634329,0.000017671773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030608402,0.00030101047,0.001699426,0.00017148619,0.0005216393,0.00004254026,0.2971726,0.000015966772,0.00031973,0.4412883,0.20366192,0.054499306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002709521,0.00029269548,0.000121560224,0.00024868923,0.000107054584,0.000059696573,0.011862497,0.000007301811,0.000017755594,0.012031896,0.9747827,0.00019718075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012839035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041028278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9210659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004572977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012512209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7226881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1570629652","doi":"","title":"Protecting the Dignity and Autonomy of Women: Rethinking the Place of Constructive Consent in the Tort of Sexual Battery","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Autonomy; Tort; Constructive; Law; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Gender studies; Computer science; Liability","score_opus":0.033870480268388764,"score_gpt":0.29080364811252873,"score_spread":0.25693316784414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1570629652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98676807,0.00022722236,0.000021246986,0.0003799202,0.0000723651,0.00037511956,0.0000019577856,0.0000072667176,0.012146814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990735,0.000010311497,0.000099481884,0.000002265638,0.00008856766,0.0000014485955,3.533379e-7,0.0000034589752,0.0007206312],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99567467,0.003013117,0.00017906573,0.00017428168,0.0006887763,0.00027009292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99519926,0.0039927373,0.00026704886,0.00018515419,0.00031133962,0.000044443],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007083145,0.00006696639,0.00019674482,0.000082915176,0.0014265504,0.00003689586,0.00039508464,0.00008765142,0.000011682878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010371648,0.000048505262,0.000025570533,0.0004032184,0.0032437171,0.00013220904,0.0001915636,0.00093138684,2.1593038e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017134137,0.000056854176,0.1706368,0.00012523911,0.00004242291,0.000010467488,0.82298493,0.00006701777,0.0029573773,0.0025393297,0.000049176397,0.00035906504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051855115,0.0005032279,0.078100994,0.00013725989,0.00002072043,0.0000054434913,0.90650785,0.00012679952,0.00062974356,0.0011367613,0.012207288,0.0001053519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020702215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008107168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0925358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000174844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046102886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572964298","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v30i2.12437","title":"JUDICIAL DISCRETION IN THE DETERMINATION OF POST-DIVORCE CHILD SUPPORT: A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MAINTENANCE ACT 99 OF 1998 AS COMPARED TO THE CANADIAN FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT GUIDELINES OF 1997","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Discretion; Interpretation (philosophy); Obligation; Child support; Government (linguistics); Welfare; Duty; Judicial interpretation; Political science; Law; Family law","score_opus":0.027946106230464327,"score_gpt":0.32231501797889267,"score_spread":0.29436891174842833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572964298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84602225,0.0004933907,0.00027888577,0.06821867,0.0006435595,0.0038346986,0.0018055422,0.000018982091,0.078684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99815965,0.000007160934,0.0001154615,0.001338883,0.00009028377,0.00002967192,0.000024766821,0.0000103548655,0.00022377956],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976581,0.00044198762,0.00069794117,0.00020907528,0.0007416169,0.00025133006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981092,0.00008028196,0.00066959736,0.00061918155,0.00046733933,0.000054367374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011431514,0.00012584936,0.00030651514,0.00006126888,0.0002712774,0.000027614517,0.00093132874,0.0000878078,0.00007140284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005817729,0.00006797975,0.00019173449,0.000913693,0.00053212856,0.000093939205,0.00011917761,0.00016763632,0.0000028940053],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016565362,0.00040402033,0.06939345,0.00033906937,0.00009777091,0.000004519185,0.88254327,0.00025747993,0.00180307,0.031870723,0.004264507,0.008856489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014308931,0.00034024296,0.64957833,0.0013029083,0.00028329703,0.000018942006,0.063942686,0.00060687755,0.011858878,0.0022881012,0.26774004,0.00060878537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15843917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5059037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8186006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000976077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005746309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84716487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1574901069","doi":"","title":"Metropolitanisation : a tale of three cities in Canada and South Africa","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Africanus Journal of Development Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Metropolitan area; Sustainability; Equity (law); Decentralization; Business; Corporate governance; Economic growth; Local government; Government (linguistics); Economic policy; Development economics; Economics; Finance; Geography; Political science; Public administration; Market economy","score_opus":0.06164617737434093,"score_gpt":0.2828342618494007,"score_spread":0.22118808447505978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1574901069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98347014,0.009752974,0.00004416311,0.00034391586,0.00023529238,0.00009501146,0.0000033475183,0.0000050612553,0.006050106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99563533,0.0004201199,0.0035987087,0.000019569981,0.00005470986,0.0000042579436,1.192544e-7,0.000006263325,0.00026093368],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813193,0.00010104277,0.00061291776,0.00010626242,0.0007595776,0.000288271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872553,0.00029367764,0.00045363684,0.00006618286,0.00036536733,0.000095626805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006119493,0.00011666091,0.00042250275,0.00019857574,0.0003039703,0.000008478537,0.00019668113,0.000028924489,0.000015038891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006991124,0.00009785281,0.00003337296,0.00042270272,0.00049565773,0.00016825253,0.00008517021,0.00012834271,7.878989e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017513337,0.00001637982,0.34487796,0.000015531583,0.00012480962,0.000054519704,0.65351987,0.000006881104,0.0000054592233,0.00045318203,0.0004666786,0.0004412235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095758255,0.00013982478,0.30430627,0.00017970598,0.000058373873,0.000018255829,0.6377705,0.000002627359,0.00029134649,0.0026142201,0.05327087,0.00039045123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19390741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6242155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4303081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011465405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030376716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81146044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576654223","doi":"","title":"A legal comparison between South African, Canadian and Australian workmen's compensation law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Law; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03741250059426563,"score_gpt":0.3288176060820602,"score_spread":0.2914051054877945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576654223","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071384326,0.00012655256,0.0000037588406,0.0013580497,0.0007674603,0.00084669224,0.00006748284,0.00015473408,0.92529094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8474763,0.0000035746205,0.00048537517,0.0001094515,0.00056992547,0.00004017457,0.00061845937,0.000036238762,0.15066049],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740577,0.00022535711,0.00045387034,0.000505272,0.00064469874,0.00076503213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826276,0.000121479854,0.0002700855,0.00026746167,0.00022382304,0.00085436954],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038436364,0.0003307291,0.0005376431,0.00022642806,0.0009826161,0.0007947429,0.00045093836,0.0006865966,0.0016181116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009039927,0.0003419586,0.00008189789,0.00037992417,0.00033511998,0.00037936532,0.000021669097,0.00057009095,0.000581394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017999719,0.00002690574,0.01971219,0.00007375164,0.00014346384,0.000011178825,0.62253684,0.0000035082053,0.0000056620042,0.33742803,0.016877128,0.003163322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014932448,0.000029866334,0.008938323,0.000055723805,0.00010715377,9.193923e-8,0.1071354,0.0000066217913,0.00002009319,0.000632478,0.8824344,0.0004904766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9157089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9524038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8655573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004456262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006798355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1578391147","doi":"","title":"Defining the limits of the common-law, South African and European privilege against self-incrimination","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review = Stellenbosch Regstydskrif","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Privilege (computing); Common law; Political science; Statutory law","score_opus":0.023421961660647788,"score_gpt":0.2904408270188929,"score_spread":0.2670188653582451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1578391147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010300318,0.08041515,0.000056959176,0.0065509174,0.00086537283,0.0024268015,0.000043421176,0.00032558615,0.8990155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97996557,0.013918561,0.0007468172,0.0039062933,0.000394729,0.000058905876,0.000010425397,0.000106757376,0.0008919661],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98939157,0.0058286637,0.0013056201,0.00087397546,0.0015924003,0.0010077768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994607,0.0016359242,0.0010706212,0.0019047869,0.00041874836,0.00036297625],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007366732,0.0006001465,0.0010312248,0.00007519366,0.0024663713,0.00024587492,0.0022709256,0.00022001985,0.00007045026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012418244,0.00038924225,0.00042256777,0.0010661278,0.002347498,0.000444099,0.00072255335,0.0008976928,0.00019093236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014440616,0.00012211698,0.0007307466,0.0011811929,0.00009213943,0.0000041049047,0.042578653,0.0000061814158,0.00002227511,0.9349386,0.0016832431,0.018626295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043938757,0.000117104275,0.00025576464,0.002075853,0.0003386612,0.00000494484,0.0024581635,0.00006839326,0.00021325168,0.00072437763,0.9927899,0.00051417353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066154357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070320145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9911067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001448842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018688409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W157918589","doi":"","title":"Pacta commissoria (vervalbedinge) en pandreg : aantekeninge","year":2010,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Journal of South African Law / Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Philosophy; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.01661888708315236,"score_gpt":0.2902815755631063,"score_spread":0.27366268847995395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W157918589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54387987,0.008130802,0.00039384878,0.013390438,0.021653546,0.0014769225,0.00069360156,0.00043037703,0.40995055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747892,0.00035385138,0.0039972477,0.0004045196,0.010605585,0.000019917587,0.00001342298,0.00029887797,0.009517365],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858463,0.0019498313,0.0035893281,0.0012950602,0.0042990586,0.0030204237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98763114,0.0020203306,0.00420914,0.001776799,0.0018707132,0.0024918553],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072159385,0.001524752,0.0026857874,0.0007568786,0.0018329417,0.001387405,0.0042453334,0.0017615317,0.0016157432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025538001,0.0013967927,0.0019257918,0.0019366975,0.0039546117,0.0019515372,0.0007174871,0.005840779,0.0006530515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021415022,0.0018385323,0.016393576,0.00043877432,0.0019985863,0.0021481824,0.85233015,0.000054905056,0.009329961,0.080694295,0.029079745,0.0035518066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029504676,0.001057195,0.0009367135,0.00055350584,0.0010049437,0.00013009795,0.042457584,0.00004159671,0.0012765813,0.0032726247,0.9445973,0.0017213621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037534977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030256277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91551757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000730865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015855278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580896534","doi":"","title":"Specialised intellectual property courts : where does South Africa stand on the global map? : intellectual property law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Without Prejudice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Law; Political science; Property law; Property rights","score_opus":0.03046327200662017,"score_gpt":0.2739175606346154,"score_spread":0.24345428862799526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1580896534","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0149054015,0.0006625735,0.0007980311,0.008904045,0.0017495641,0.002031056,0.000093353316,0.0006256384,0.97023034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9575363,0.000032736887,0.00037353885,0.0009147125,0.0017194244,0.00009839618,0.0000030909264,0.000054601245,0.0392672],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99441636,0.0016035369,0.0005089851,0.0008643372,0.0015169487,0.0010898268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968853,0.0012157836,0.00022943923,0.0008894556,0.0003794761,0.00040055098],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021092484,0.00047617033,0.0005226771,0.00005465794,0.0016829782,0.0006634622,0.0015136673,0.00030384996,0.0026109952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00564028,0.00020210094,0.00017622218,0.00064030034,0.0020776037,0.00034216425,0.00036037416,0.000668454,0.0015574736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008391576,0.00028295766,0.0011399278,0.00006622687,0.00014578697,0.000011705049,0.84048176,0.000017680371,0.00003079962,0.054729577,0.09694269,0.005311754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004985399,0.0003034896,0.000021961827,0.00019692584,0.000061823484,0.0000011331994,0.015886331,0.00020046913,0.00012843216,0.0029263927,0.9792922,0.00048227617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022771284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046915067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9426309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005270908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005090657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581458977","doi":"10.4102/jtscm.v3i1.54","title":"Driver pretesting system in Zimbabwe: An analysis of impacts and perceptions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Transport Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Stakeholder; Perception; Business; Government (linguistics); Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.01027439998144532,"score_gpt":0.28005948639717876,"score_spread":0.26978508641573345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581458977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99451846,0.00045874805,0.0004759133,0.00036272875,0.000045389526,0.00014633377,0.0000058465803,0.000009620508,0.003976968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99748105,0.00037847416,0.0019445323,0.000034809498,0.000049568825,8.6758615e-7,0.0000025437098,0.0000035983226,0.00010458229],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988058,0.00008274806,0.0004377591,0.000119457975,0.00036702378,0.00018719591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994734,0.000030418907,0.00018879739,0.00009052061,0.00006615479,0.00015074086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011779544,0.00008554705,0.00032032456,0.0004899563,0.00010774157,0.00003161545,0.00014373749,0.000047772784,0.00003228817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011062396,0.000075039745,0.00008963934,0.00056298816,0.00009761495,0.0002820738,0.000006770369,0.00010593275,1.6502855e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046848847,0.00010710701,0.837225,0.00009666791,0.0002488343,0.00016379464,0.15096584,0.00088987494,0.0000683909,0.006040057,0.000015996528,0.0041315435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004200349,0.00014033317,0.96292263,0.0001460074,0.00069015403,0.0000016158717,0.033804104,0.00066821004,0.0000019162499,0.00011953811,0.0009920782,0.000093349685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025331663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068840507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12569761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007581827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020163196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30600318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586503322","doi":"","title":"Equality and unfair discrimination : refining the Harksen test","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Supreme court; Charter; Law; Relation (database); Context (archaeology); Test (biology); Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.07026810988229498,"score_gpt":0.3092973164572257,"score_spread":0.2390292065749307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586503322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021463629,0.00045806976,0.0004690502,0.00279399,0.0005459603,0.00012519656,0.000022138292,0.00009237691,0.9740296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99624366,0.000011835156,0.0012311788,0.0002864118,0.0005414217,0.0000057160573,6.380819e-7,0.000015147543,0.0016639859],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798304,0.00048611008,0.000312555,0.00020048887,0.0005637514,0.00045406685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986496,0.00040621214,0.00028272453,0.00021792729,0.00016021152,0.00028335542],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002528067,0.0001303029,0.00016117057,0.00004645992,0.0024184065,0.00029709793,0.0004755679,0.0000838808,0.00029310034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013720797,0.00008818816,0.00007452442,0.0002807608,0.001152686,0.0004009007,0.00010565193,0.000484722,0.000044390094],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017027865,0.000035753532,0.011652257,0.0000038620474,0.000017520217,0.000012438921,0.7640874,5.160954e-7,0.000009191988,0.22106175,0.00021637065,0.002885923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005589702,0.00019346333,0.016283203,0.00006502358,0.00013503025,0.000028925702,0.41399023,0.000024932586,0.000058352118,0.03341084,0.53477186,0.00047917606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003812523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003357117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010936326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010414243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588949821","doi":"","title":"The effect of value-added tax on small to medium-sized developers of residential properties in South Africa","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Unisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Value-added tax; Business; Goods and services; Ad valorem tax; Tax credit; Tax reform; Property tax; Legislation; Accounts payable; Indirect tax; Public economics; Economics; Finance; Market economy","score_opus":0.018097334468779386,"score_gpt":0.2322368743754888,"score_spread":0.2141395399067094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588949821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80279744,0.0008848452,0.000033464676,0.00015934491,0.0011927907,0.0013254728,0.00009415408,0.000063848616,0.19344868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831427,0.000016846629,0.0005733716,0.0000046339724,0.00011454058,0.0000057201773,0.000031131167,0.000018406026,0.016092693],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958613,0.00076049444,0.0006196098,0.0005450474,0.0017222798,0.00049130275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974124,0.00038630312,0.0008774426,0.00047529873,0.00062439527,0.00022420121],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011564585,0.0003680889,0.00077529787,0.0004497237,0.0014312228,0.000048790575,0.0014764582,0.00051418674,0.000022469572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014823341,0.0003321466,0.0003460035,0.0009479059,0.0017598894,0.0001933157,0.00012350269,0.0005109429,0.00002116984],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006338897,0.00020396485,0.0010244466,0.00035759862,0.00029671137,0.00012875485,0.9700898,0.0015226955,0.0041120425,0.014907013,0.00033762326,0.00068043015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01029574,0.0051911385,0.058331907,0.0079568075,0.0020624727,0.000005558555,0.68716156,0.00018072559,0.0573224,0.0011257926,0.16668302,0.0036828776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023274391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015994849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28292826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005246574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025809568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592054344","doi":"","title":"An analytical study of the regulation of South African diamond trade from 1994 to 2009 with reference to aspects of the 1996 Constitution.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"ResearchSpace (University of KwaZulu-Natal)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts; European Commission; U.S. Department of the Treasury; African Union; Royal Bank of Canada; International Fund for Animal Welfare","keywords":"Constitution; Diamond; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.03519623775333819,"score_gpt":0.31525177118235626,"score_spread":0.28005553342901807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1592054344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95316994,0.000063758554,0.000028081662,0.0010648558,0.0000568216,0.0014722489,0.00047448592,0.000017741313,0.043652043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976395,0.000008829617,0.00031260008,0.0000063359785,0.000025750383,0.0000010784024,0.000044055203,0.000010419589,0.0019514428],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958337,0.00074402,0.00026550045,0.0004898939,0.00231104,0.00035584954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997547,0.0002242943,0.00052266085,0.000987029,0.0004360606,0.0002829595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007121417,0.0002010378,0.0005501412,0.00035968467,0.00048632422,0.000025658868,0.0018766011,0.00023902139,0.0000714531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047183497,0.00016047446,0.00013497424,0.0023237874,0.0011353928,0.0002516326,0.00016966417,0.00048044758,0.0000045234306],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024620295,0.0014334182,0.017035421,0.00016708432,0.0003926567,0.0000186128,0.9144818,0.0013255511,0.003440502,0.05659489,0.00094247813,0.0017055506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008393499,0.0010205923,0.47359797,0.00048527803,0.00028121553,1.8921085e-7,0.51789385,0.00006313164,0.0012591727,0.0005931637,0.0036601706,0.0003058795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05729345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16925964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45656258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023770315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010651093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94898415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595545527","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v31i1.2922","title":"An international perspective of restorative justice practices and research outcomes","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1251056966468923,"score_gpt":0.5630817214649989,"score_spread":0.4379760248181066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595545527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81167006,0.0004495949,0.0008034907,0.025020199,0.0021385069,0.00043338863,0.000022518114,0.000032753618,0.15942949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99258834,0.000049221402,0.005721288,0.000043982505,0.00079181505,0.000005140284,2.33607e-7,0.000004385086,0.00079556543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967793,0.0003045245,0.00025116536,0.00027210714,0.0019873218,0.00040555297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99589765,0.0011602867,0.00037673063,0.00012424272,0.00216286,0.00027820028],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008773292,0.00006628963,0.00013112165,0.00024935967,0.0019871867,0.00052885263,0.00093621446,0.000060386563,0.000045146866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018305123,0.000050699855,0.000043103693,0.00074160023,0.0038746125,0.0022552586,0.00009323507,0.00038228452,0.000004160748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088450775,0.00022755386,0.014879495,0.000005653911,0.0000101975675,0.000010488237,0.04860795,0.000015271571,0.0020879132,0.93237215,0.001028677,0.00066618156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011189329,0.0011532216,0.09221641,0.00007011073,0.000089535584,0.000027001737,0.14296323,0.00082437217,0.0020601808,0.3146866,0.4443693,0.00042112777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021663713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003461348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61768556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042050247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010550922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W160769704","doi":"","title":"Self-incrimination, private records, and required reporting in regulatory statutes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Privilege (computing); Law; Statutory law; Context (archaeology); Self-incrimination; Waiver; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.02234647486807,"score_gpt":0.2916551616949299,"score_spread":0.2693086868268599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W160769704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7134768,0.00059516873,0.00044751386,0.0019447024,0.00096308254,0.00033392417,0.0000057316092,0.00024615918,0.28198692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98805654,0.0000263781,0.010569261,0.0001650616,0.00072984974,0.0000064956535,0.0000010564318,0.000025880749,0.00041947633],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965303,0.00068541965,0.0011245498,0.00032994556,0.0006934153,0.00063639384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973359,0.00028483174,0.0015148434,0.00026407847,0.00021799347,0.0003823501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006572203,0.0001691848,0.00033030933,0.0001693379,0.0011356382,0.0003340246,0.00032793576,0.00013395147,0.000058765316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049759345,0.0001626923,0.00007544,0.00044399124,0.00050825975,0.00056864345,0.00009081161,0.00047992132,0.000015239928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045739536,0.00007461117,0.10386002,0.000044586195,0.000041847597,0.00009913305,0.5362133,0.000016286296,0.000040967796,0.35291368,0.00039904827,0.0062507982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011614444,0.00017542645,0.0184776,0.00016900072,0.000072129675,0.00005438967,0.057056442,0.00020316472,0.000101554724,0.06398283,0.85784185,0.00070416695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071252434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012202065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8574428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027811519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018171786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87345254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1666412170","doi":"","title":"Problematic aspects of the right to bail under South African law : a comparison with Canadian law and proposals for reform","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law reform","score_opus":0.014470187945205822,"score_gpt":0.2877414275538324,"score_spread":0.2732712396086266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1666412170","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063193617,0.000082129205,0.000034693876,0.001551084,0.00014868742,0.0031315014,0.000075885226,0.000043907345,0.9886128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700844,2.9993996e-7,0.0017221179,0.00033297323,0.000076658784,0.00019527764,0.000052973337,0.000036100813,0.027499177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980845,0.000089605775,0.00038356186,0.0003491152,0.00059789384,0.0004953574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987246,0.00007339459,0.0002905112,0.00032511988,0.0003108278,0.00027557331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003875147,0.00024174529,0.00047881744,0.00009086945,0.00075106474,0.00016249903,0.00045836085,0.00023569136,0.00006624922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041645915,0.0001405028,0.000070203045,0.0004325491,0.00036996152,0.00012488589,0.000020145455,0.00017909276,0.0000072562007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002461709,0.000028594675,0.000061751976,0.00017801614,0.00003841068,5.593919e-7,0.10021194,0.0000071575346,0.000007632007,0.8991464,0.00027832002,0.000016625887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012840127,0.00081315555,0.0010908326,0.001788946,0.0008733758,0.0000010800171,0.30647457,0.00005479089,0.004905582,0.15348823,0.52738583,0.0018395758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7985306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99634963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9637651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005265057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011411482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57766587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W167291807","doi":"10.21991/c9s953","title":"UNDERSTANDING GROOTBOOM — A RESPONSE TO CASS R. SUNSTEIN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Enforcement; Political science; Law; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Human rights; Order (exchange); Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.17536705212009115,"score_gpt":0.32126896627456664,"score_spread":0.14590191415447548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W167291807","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006815494,0.0004367022,0.28771406,0.009835881,0.003827361,0.001275193,0.00024510178,0.000656878,0.6891933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990714,0.000013335109,0.004973273,0.0016313475,0.00023859502,0.00011929244,0.000018909162,0.000020052881,0.0022711896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956781,0.00042382785,0.0006591784,0.0007521142,0.0010413782,0.0014453599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975587,0.00045321378,0.0001820489,0.00054839236,0.00037625534,0.00088135106],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016796553,0.00040175577,0.0004094856,0.0005269047,0.0036656037,0.00020212786,0.0008257457,0.000347305,0.0014636839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024347089,0.00042875027,0.00025901032,0.0011283475,0.009150009,0.0010115706,0.00030656633,0.000388396,0.0017399107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058798026,0.000108181164,0.008752104,0.0000062611794,0.0000586718,0.00012808488,0.009325098,0.000048329963,0.00016999517,0.97388387,0.0068485755,0.00008283732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001280842,0.00016069594,0.00035963417,0.00017790767,0.00006862947,0.00007732802,0.041422375,0.000047692243,0.00034005567,0.06246512,0.89266163,0.0009381057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016051981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024318723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9838985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024989098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032795295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1703486188","doi":"","title":"Enforcement of fundamental rights and the standing rules under the Nigerian Constitution : a need for a more liberal provision","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Human Rights Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Anachronism; Enforcement; Common law; Interpretation (philosophy); Expansive; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.02036352092857403,"score_gpt":0.3175825170209664,"score_spread":0.2972189960923924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1703486188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7424304,0.00068541634,0.0011974513,0.008685735,0.00065217895,0.0024388966,0.000058707403,0.000079034566,0.2437722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99834406,0.0000037270204,0.0003848205,0.00018884888,0.0004405,0.000013022105,0.0000033307783,0.0000051066418,0.0006165558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815744,0.000283887,0.00041583672,0.0001680275,0.00059908425,0.00037572713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989904,0.00022426774,0.00034648145,0.00016647318,0.00013067397,0.00014167432],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012440158,0.00015483888,0.0002513307,0.00006121572,0.0064418544,0.0003945395,0.00038076355,0.00006797216,0.0001414048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016556169,0.00007273536,0.00013891133,0.00012451317,0.0029081013,0.0003561966,0.000037521073,0.00024057466,0.0000016339923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015065934,0.00003801735,0.000015507812,0.0000026441592,0.0000398364,0.0000031799198,0.07339613,0.0000089436335,0.000040717554,0.925808,0.0004092692,0.00008707523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025561063,0.00030847837,0.00011788848,0.00007560678,0.00010154993,0.000017040893,0.015079363,0.000059141945,0.00013703482,0.78409415,0.19726709,0.00018652632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026026878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003097698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2559137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022132814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000073366384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W171480398","doi":"","title":"Governance of cybersecurity in South Africa","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer security; Corporate governance; Business; Information governance; Public administration; Political science; Computer science; Information system; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.02765076795755129,"score_gpt":0.29964006329255255,"score_spread":0.27198929533500127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W171480398","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13973656,0.0012000802,0.000048963786,0.00016636647,0.0002651306,0.00009812062,0.000006207529,0.000035048317,0.8584435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922194,0.000008971903,0.00092365214,0.000029020332,0.000133949,0.0000038073656,1.556442e-7,0.0000040327463,0.006677025],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990355,0.00008861486,0.00014175037,0.00008514065,0.0003094977,0.0003395433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996108,0.00007319203,0.00006876739,0.00013361186,0.000028870616,0.00008478583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005941667,0.00005042252,0.000109370776,0.000019929981,0.000048934187,0.000012615693,0.00021239292,0.00006435947,0.0004997647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036221265,0.00004604104,0.00003430416,0.00034196267,0.00019703434,0.00039630017,0.000047376732,0.000084063635,0.00011215934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033188305,0.000052851006,0.07783015,0.0000028596644,0.000001818791,4.2715064e-7,0.61435413,3.674549e-7,0.00001224093,0.30718857,0.00039514562,0.00015811289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002745234,0.000015713138,0.03439384,0.000017240847,0.0000069842263,5.6350885e-8,0.03416288,0.000005248463,0.00043631124,0.002289162,0.9281917,0.0002062898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018579833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005611333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9277966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007368509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004724048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5472073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1754125440","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1203","title":"Managing Charter Equality Rights: The Supreme Court of Canada’s Disposition of Leave to Appeal Applications in Section 15 Cases, 1989-2010","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Charter; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; High Court","score_opus":0.02555511051597266,"score_gpt":0.3141556700297845,"score_spread":0.28860055951381186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1754125440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19271968,0.07059255,0.0056496584,0.19397044,0.010863116,0.032953992,0.0020540725,0.0005784398,0.49061805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977767,0.0005079124,0.00017264149,0.00064421236,0.00029905624,0.00015267883,0.000031710068,0.000013892983,0.00040123388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752235,0.00039458973,0.0006595462,0.00031542528,0.0007255331,0.00038256324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836755,0.00023109005,0.00028293696,0.0006510153,0.00030817275,0.00015922976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019304556,0.00017116983,0.00043843157,0.00004668857,0.00041117362,0.00003018857,0.00056750764,0.000101994636,0.0002891312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016051209,0.00013186895,0.00010860199,0.0005480535,0.0003477541,0.00020404306,0.00008369548,0.0003755914,0.0000142702],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005478186,0.00043847837,0.005129273,0.0036748403,0.00012285967,0.000015085119,0.03230175,0.000028787439,0.0019167467,0.9121248,0.0395593,0.004633303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000102105245,0.000023852066,0.0010608804,0.0006075962,0.000076452794,0.00000221976,0.00041163276,0.00001449515,0.00025779527,0.0013954503,0.9958626,0.00018492309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6444519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9448253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9563033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002208211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038864315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53774595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1772612133","doi":"","title":"Strafregtelike struikelblokke in die mishandelde persoon se stryd om geregtigheid : regte","year":2014,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Litnet Akademies : 'n Joernaal vir die Geesteswetenskappe, Natuurwetenskappe, Regte en Godsdienswetenskappe","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Die (integrated circuit); Art; Philosophy; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.018187339154420418,"score_gpt":0.29431164612818345,"score_spread":0.276124306973763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1772612133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7028111,0.06976229,0.0005410075,0.016343273,0.021352746,0.010248265,0.0035499325,0.0043226485,0.17106873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87697875,0.008621583,0.00447307,0.0024196093,0.011884963,0.0006221076,0.0010771462,0.0016127191,0.09231004],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.948802,0.00850278,0.009241412,0.010219713,0.008976165,0.01425791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97084343,0.00786694,0.0053071124,0.007938786,0.003025567,0.0050181504],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012479631,0.0076697646,0.008898436,0.0035490394,0.004125014,0.0029983441,0.010127483,0.0085559,0.0012059532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009394166,0.008195473,0.00380542,0.0066606035,0.008053029,0.0038992753,0.004374809,0.0133217415,0.005092332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010517412,0.010465929,0.12972337,0.00876025,0.0079502,0.012828394,0.4562766,0.013745969,0.011117514,0.045527525,0.13751042,0.15557642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0117872385,0.002928656,0.022841087,0.004618641,0.0018055808,0.00026438522,0.02726081,0.011917529,0.0012970776,0.0067528766,0.8970442,0.011481926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009717645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01598213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75953376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045592124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024154573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1774255088","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1138","title":"Precedent, Principle and Pragmatism: Justice Wilson and the Expansion of Canadian Tort Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Political science; Delict; Appeal; Sociology; Public law; Private law; Black letter law; Liability","score_opus":0.03942703095278265,"score_gpt":0.3191824306053409,"score_spread":0.27975539965255825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1774255088","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017088914,0.4236544,0.000017141585,0.011627699,0.00050559326,0.002711574,0.000038901777,0.00007023355,0.54428554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8488871,0.14778325,0.0004905527,0.0018032558,0.00011039846,0.000037739635,0.000003272756,0.000012358569,0.000872068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984258,0.00037847587,0.0003066427,0.00021245054,0.0003905936,0.00028605698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898285,0.0002004928,0.00013015019,0.0003025005,0.00014037019,0.0002436502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013220118,0.000119914715,0.00036017667,0.000028956865,0.0007500288,0.00003357206,0.00025745467,0.000072748735,0.0001231376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044207255,0.000084748404,0.00004934563,0.00029444424,0.001280224,0.00023530396,0.00007744904,0.00012843747,0.000015670768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007978308,0.000010512537,0.00037826132,0.0011039221,0.000019156147,0.0000088542,0.023369199,3.4656495e-7,0.00000549339,0.97075224,0.0036257769,0.0007182815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022144409,0.000016439079,0.0001768786,0.00086928945,0.00014417019,0.000008759007,0.00023704977,0.000005602912,0.000013165277,0.0004440094,0.99775606,0.000107143474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29094175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39270678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99413025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058361624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002326796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7137799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1783277956","doi":"10.25071/1920-7336.26031","title":"An Evaluation of South Africa's Application of the OAU Refugee Definition","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Refuge Canada s Journal on Refuge","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Appeal; Convention; Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); Political science; Law; Comprehensive Plan of Action; Public administration; Business","score_opus":0.05549133444766365,"score_gpt":0.3128300183247841,"score_spread":0.25733868387712044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1783277956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99462664,0.00055374997,0.000092286835,0.00020089473,0.00048209605,0.00037445428,0.000048323287,0.000017261498,0.0036042742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99904674,0.000027682565,0.00030016992,0.0001559435,0.0002948123,0.000016495567,0.000005436929,0.000020122237,0.00013259101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947509,0.0010430095,0.00062562124,0.00023242208,0.002996612,0.00035143035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997134,0.00009650678,0.0009417702,0.00055904,0.0010236831,0.0002450459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022591224,0.00015728231,0.00027782278,0.0001196419,0.0007766637,0.000022596352,0.00070259767,0.00013949048,0.000134108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000719413,0.00011849772,0.00012663817,0.00071095646,0.00035479027,0.00022846338,0.000030870608,0.00039986515,0.0000055342994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028005926,0.0005701093,0.012908913,0.000059805636,0.00017589782,0.00003290823,0.020202717,0.0026833592,0.0039086766,0.9541637,0.00077711797,0.004236791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064368185,0.0001426936,0.007356949,0.00006935865,0.000116437644,0.000014970245,0.00017361426,0.0002642373,0.0016941525,0.00358612,0.98572105,0.00021672704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032302793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011593255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9849439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010977279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031328376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6469309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1801314064","doi":"","title":"Administrative Law in Public-Sector Employment Relationships","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Public sector; Legislation; Economic Justice; Administrative law; Supreme court; State (computer science); Subject (documents); Public law; Power (physics); Political science","score_opus":0.12795058424267347,"score_gpt":0.29050052465917486,"score_spread":0.1625499404165014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1801314064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29335928,0.00007338171,0.00014520567,0.0030633113,0.000095588475,0.000571299,0.000066268214,0.000047396054,0.70257825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9575697,0.00013362776,0.0027083308,0.000041024512,0.000023147619,1.0183772e-7,0.000019097266,0.000008790946,0.03949618],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782443,0.0004986293,0.00019430692,0.00042401243,0.0006430839,0.0004155185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983244,0.00025160675,0.00033810086,0.00041293667,0.00036362075,0.00030935692],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006258899,0.00017699107,0.00046884478,0.00023920699,0.0013692077,0.00003946476,0.0018326569,0.00024927896,0.007157267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012041009,0.00025289238,0.00015948295,0.0008620399,0.0018646352,0.0018416105,0.0005820268,0.00036576742,0.000093849456],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007301821,0.00084021135,0.049736705,0.000031413456,0.00023043266,0.00061748945,0.5924628,0.000046097106,0.0001291595,0.33783725,0.016211813,0.0011264613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002184423,0.00023936489,0.02264954,0.000060684553,0.00007564291,0.000003320495,0.2012803,0.000034525838,0.000046790614,0.0008391746,0.7721337,0.00045254125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.065257266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.112796694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7559219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004238845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093889236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1810554196","doi":"","title":"Contested Concepts: Equality and Dignity in the Case-Law of the Canadian Supreme Court and South African Constitutional Court","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Supreme court; Law; CLARITY; Political science; Constitutional court; Economic Justice; Constitutional law; Proportionality (law); Sociology; Constitution","score_opus":0.10685737232591842,"score_gpt":0.3635527079116429,"score_spread":0.2566953355857245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1810554196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98895454,0.00006087831,0.0000020762066,0.0020813607,0.000085631,0.00048820238,0.00012261739,0.0000062771487,0.008198418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986202,0.0000067444557,0.000050631897,0.000014800269,0.000043363765,0.0000011138553,0.000001807893,0.0000025357135,0.0012588174],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979627,0.0008312132,0.00014366965,0.00022485857,0.0005165025,0.00032101828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987774,0.00036760853,0.0001031987,0.00022147379,0.00029842276,0.00023192972],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002025219,0.00008389597,0.00017344461,0.00006625767,0.001683388,0.00011158233,0.00036553913,0.00015887184,0.000019123034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014900995,0.000065163054,0.00003293849,0.00021937996,0.013726173,0.00020621208,0.00015078802,0.00056631607,7.582915e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051649706,0.00005756749,0.68763477,0.000088920024,0.000035439523,0.00033663315,0.16546129,6.480984e-7,0.001322999,0.1447126,0.00023767458,0.00005980578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015040522,0.00022003298,0.5524912,0.00018392404,0.000078426565,0.00026860458,0.40420276,0.000049191323,0.0012574805,0.001293295,0.03808205,0.00036900304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.616813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50892776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23874147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006776049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048784775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1814892625","doi":"10.4102/satnt.v24i1/2.167","title":"A decade of democracy: environmental management in a changing world","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suid-Afrikaanse Tydskrif vir Natuurwetenskap en Tegnologie","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earth Summit; Political science; Legislation; Charter; Government (linguistics); Constitution; Summit; Environmental law; Democracy; Public administration; Environmental protection; Economic growth; Environmental planning; Sustainable development; Politics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.017599888277501582,"score_gpt":0.3077595941773805,"score_spread":0.29015970589987894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1814892625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74589723,0.0069653527,0.00021273893,0.011084092,0.0010300933,0.0021688472,0.000075998985,0.0007875053,0.23177813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9702265,0.0006983635,0.009232306,0.0004980818,0.0003570927,0.00009845742,0.000011960842,0.000061119325,0.018816108],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99514747,0.0005680549,0.0008398337,0.00081157085,0.0010152593,0.0016178355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998164,0.00055567856,0.0002752694,0.00072131807,0.000041626994,0.00024213505],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019139106,0.00043527829,0.0006054549,0.0023123664,0.00039950758,0.00006641493,0.0013199478,0.00041155712,0.00069613993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043434819,0.00044421636,0.0002406621,0.002755677,0.0007790273,0.0005273325,0.00057230453,0.00078368274,0.0005281191],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008698822,0.0028443947,0.10454112,0.0002569161,0.00084429956,0.0012108834,0.34424514,0.0012498042,0.010112581,0.16700737,0.0065133767,0.36030424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026914086,0.0001774104,0.008343298,0.000213792,0.00016157993,0.000006981421,0.02836163,0.00037413972,0.008949706,0.0064180675,0.94294846,0.0013535552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020140012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009988418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93643504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010422338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013109003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1819105132","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1178","title":"Lovelace and Law Revisited: The Substantive Equality Promise of Kapp","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Dignity; Law; Supreme court; Section (typography); Test (biology); High Court; Legislature; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04251897755341901,"score_gpt":0.3545310692028195,"score_spread":0.3120120916494005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1819105132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016180876,0.48638612,0.000037725753,0.017594928,0.00011602186,0.0020259572,0.00003851068,0.00008517596,0.4920975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94866186,0.045871563,0.00024056698,0.004320439,0.00012547386,0.000012492363,0.000003581821,0.0000100752895,0.00075396104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759203,0.0007696299,0.00045471362,0.00028806392,0.00057349744,0.00032208703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861866,0.0002341337,0.00024522122,0.0005103855,0.00026613654,0.0001254699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003037638,0.00015851096,0.00049500883,0.000010120273,0.0003438222,0.00006139183,0.00048973557,0.000081482984,0.00020579655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045556636,0.00010764868,0.00012377031,0.00040925335,0.0009155082,0.00025093296,0.00005166118,0.00020412836,0.000064534106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008314528,0.000035875317,0.00009040173,0.00048836484,0.00001591936,0.0000022459205,0.008920325,6.471913e-8,0.000036725356,0.9862639,0.0024582774,0.001679616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011835476,0.000039823477,0.00008351348,0.0015327849,0.00010295535,7.864695e-7,0.00022993027,9.018502e-7,0.00007790801,0.006850658,0.99081784,0.0001445409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009958436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049836864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9883596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058995152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000086014436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43897858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1820010189","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1246","title":"The Aboriginal Sentencing Provision of the Criminal Code as a Protected “Other Right” under Section 25 of the Charter","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Criminal code; Charter; Political science; Law; Criminal procedure; Code (set theory); Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.028645309101327156,"score_gpt":0.3431667786345331,"score_spread":0.3145214695332059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1820010189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31966323,0.22016625,0.00071598694,0.063320376,0.012359199,0.023951791,0.00013264794,0.0003751203,0.3593154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99593365,0.0012701013,0.000075005424,0.00073580263,0.000422798,0.00007472819,4.69846e-7,0.000017477063,0.0014699587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973075,0.00091548316,0.00039884308,0.0001657141,0.00084899424,0.00036350306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985349,0.00012718086,0.00039158954,0.0005717603,0.00030915183,0.000065394765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001898072,0.00014273274,0.00025307073,0.000011418253,0.0007787128,0.00003509982,0.0006827206,0.00008420158,0.000287516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023601891,0.00006233321,0.000208431,0.00043146592,0.00071323384,0.0002232342,0.00008282764,0.00027825835,0.00003305306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008696451,0.00044405102,0.0059833988,0.0039661056,0.00022505785,0.0000010408218,0.10455663,0.0000049768737,0.005151512,0.86620444,0.0075888913,0.0057869554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009962414,0.000025398693,0.0006722834,0.0017293331,0.00015741428,0.0000028827976,0.00079973025,0.0000060091456,0.0010694722,0.00082424347,0.99451625,0.000097338336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034822216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022710746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9869274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011692509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022539655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59893084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1824834794","doi":"","title":"Sentencing the corporate offender in South Africa : a comparative approach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Punishment (psychology); Commission; Sentencing guidelines; Political science; Criminal law; Law; Corporate crime; Criminal procedure; Criminology; Corporate law; Sentence; Business; Sociology; Psychology; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.1706108760139859,"score_gpt":0.3380569271859532,"score_spread":0.16744605117196731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1824834794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8073829,0.0065010954,0.012624049,0.0006196389,0.0025235363,0.0007382005,0.000033388784,0.00006871406,0.16950852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934494,0.0000075478238,0.004356092,0.00014698705,0.0015907515,0.000009543574,7.6057967e-7,0.000024084151,0.00041483712],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99524957,0.0012936444,0.0008296725,0.00023117398,0.0013178984,0.0010780678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965067,0.00062614237,0.0014439443,0.000296589,0.00056134915,0.00056529033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004149966,0.00028689162,0.00058119907,0.00030337615,0.0006126047,0.00015515003,0.0009946127,0.00012744339,0.00007307684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012135009,0.00020000138,0.00021675955,0.0011932765,0.00123057,0.00065696373,0.00012267006,0.0010226419,0.000065277556],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020862807,0.000155552,0.0032488643,0.000052717533,0.00005001061,0.00003174118,0.98889333,0.00030143693,0.000021956173,0.0066569555,0.00025250248,0.0001263047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051778887,0.000111765556,0.0012853988,0.000057703684,0.0008910076,0.000025348783,0.9883467,0.00013165663,0.000020263715,0.00030051082,0.00804624,0.00026564163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000081096034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019730267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18606654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003082318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005193328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8155819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1840587976","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1281","title":"Section 15(2), Ameliorative Programs and Proportionality Review","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Proportionality (law); Law; Supreme court; Scrutiny; Political science; Government (linguistics); Interpretation (philosophy); Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0437121907092876,"score_gpt":0.3492321278906274,"score_spread":0.3055199371813398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1840587976","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00048403913,0.86264616,0.000035847384,0.023963343,0.0003740824,0.005243477,0.0000051313136,0.00021972263,0.10702817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24873663,0.7334274,0.001446889,0.01101513,0.0007300733,0.0013060754,0.000052938492,0.000032687636,0.0032521654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975758,0.0006045051,0.0004794799,0.00036176198,0.00064274634,0.00033569886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985906,0.00005391689,0.00023817571,0.00031573823,0.00058687356,0.00021473531],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017730021,0.00017373815,0.00046743974,0.000013611731,0.00040567204,0.00011273227,0.0002373763,0.00008389808,0.0022697328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051327393,0.00013787943,0.000113927235,0.00048187745,0.0006195519,0.00062625547,0.00007380993,0.00021635483,0.0005410715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007041845,0.0004839544,0.004981164,0.039393283,0.00017326497,0.0000154313,0.011202943,1.1222069e-7,0.000034052537,0.424153,0.2966021,0.22295366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000518376,0.00003781021,0.000144319,0.008491089,0.0000869436,0.0000021539252,0.000075746015,7.9769006e-7,0.0000023960788,0.0021714082,0.9887578,0.00017771148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031801534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087254384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69215566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105483414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012966547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1849597082","doi":"10.15173/glj.v6i3.2366","title":"The Treatment Action Campaign's Quest for Equality in HIV and Health: Learning from and Lessons for the Trade Union Movement","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Labour Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alliance; Social movement; Action (physics); Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Trade union; Political science; Collective action; Economic growth; Political economy; Sociology; Public relations; International trade; Medicine; Politics; Business; Law; Economics; Virology","score_opus":0.15183134565550963,"score_gpt":0.4305086984579208,"score_spread":0.2786773528024111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1849597082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5108285,0.027889322,0.017112302,0.43758428,0.002487974,0.0023506805,0.00045134895,0.000068964786,0.0012266354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99660355,0.00166949,0.00057438127,0.00030271686,0.0005546803,0.000030455518,0.00000343494,0.0000046329983,0.00025663976],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864674,0.00048821696,0.00019859461,0.0001297739,0.00022748805,0.0003092099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991738,0.0003467186,0.00016593018,0.0000686747,0.00005430826,0.00019052964],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029776841,0.00008446662,0.00012659389,0.000010699965,0.00142958,0.0003031635,0.000117941054,0.000053009968,0.0000024145186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025152133,0.000049225673,0.0000360365,0.00009219325,0.00012535701,0.00012942062,0.000017526456,0.00013422438,5.22504e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005423095,0.00026538738,0.0750307,0.000018977806,0.00017411642,0.0000043009236,0.26812914,0.0006553063,0.000017341164,0.31906754,0.0047620754,0.33133283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014204837,0.0003390585,0.028864987,0.000022668208,0.00002236185,0.000001732995,0.0449713,0.00029825795,0.000007309519,0.03322828,0.8907362,0.00008733571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008222447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01893923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88597417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090419006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027691803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1855246521","doi":"10.25071/1920-7336.36480","title":"Critical Challenges to Protecting Unaccompanied and Separated Foreign Children in the Western Cape: Lessons Learned at the University of Cape Town Refugee Rights Unit","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Refuge Canada s Journal on Refuge","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Child protection; Documentation; Government (linguistics); Unit (ring theory); Social protection; Political science; Work (physics); Public administration; Economic growth; Social work; Foreign policy; Law; Politics; Psychology; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.043149727762664285,"score_gpt":0.3155817251995841,"score_spread":0.2724319974369198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1855246521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9775571,0.0009300165,0.0000033505153,0.018075014,0.00011749905,0.00069761724,0.000020271453,0.000018284296,0.0025808346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99779606,0.00011145008,0.000052007876,0.0007107807,0.00015577965,0.0000064424116,0.0000018398298,0.000016069689,0.0011495812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963771,0.001372359,0.00034555717,0.00033744192,0.0009231021,0.0006444411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817145,0.00060065906,0.00021168235,0.00038334457,0.00026836662,0.00036449917],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014340631,0.0002226432,0.00034908083,0.00011379908,0.001873963,0.00014315314,0.0008956416,0.00014835031,0.00031477492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051973853,0.00014190548,0.00006578095,0.00048730994,0.00040262716,0.00026001775,0.00014782918,0.000978605,0.000021406657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009996102,0.00050586613,0.0130783655,0.0001258934,0.00049646856,0.0010920246,0.0734309,0.0007858535,0.00041810403,0.89635795,0.005555368,0.0071535683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004959625,0.00017504222,0.021369832,0.00013411698,0.00003664378,0.00004998764,0.0012504519,0.000020271382,0.000065743014,0.0016403579,0.97450286,0.00025870226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06824343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4015048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9689475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006160895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054846756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1860318624","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1051","title":"Is Money No Object: Can the Government Rely on Financial Considerations Under Charter Section 1","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"La Cité Collégiale","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Argument (complex analysis); Tort; Law; Compensation (psychology); Economics; Political science; Finance; Liability","score_opus":0.03660786601367969,"score_gpt":0.30662824855732257,"score_spread":0.27002038254364286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1860318624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025798962,0.032975968,0.00015857293,0.26240543,0.004106314,0.003488623,0.00020128505,0.00028202895,0.6938019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9426046,0.006661619,0.00013548894,0.046935774,0.0009822189,0.00011877561,0.0000043994337,0.000019556754,0.0025375814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979512,0.00023472804,0.00030619622,0.00029297793,0.00088614685,0.00032876036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906826,0.00012243597,0.00012282949,0.00041611472,0.000159819,0.00011054266],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072319777,0.0001616843,0.00024548074,0.000008657087,0.0010413592,0.0001118257,0.00021805053,0.00009838736,0.0011923711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005088562,0.00011905627,0.00014443316,0.00020360081,0.00029754543,0.00014814349,0.000041687446,0.0002782296,0.00072518986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000750647,0.00009971052,0.00004397925,0.00014848287,0.00003289569,0.000008421942,0.016770873,0.00002429508,0.000025247813,0.893783,0.08873798,0.000317644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001674248,0.000056806308,0.00010922274,0.000640046,0.00006263434,0.0000016591626,0.0001455606,0.0000010711351,0.00006955477,0.008331341,0.9902517,0.00016295891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033596305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006967755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9400247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005999329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034156206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1881710185","doi":"10.21991/c92378","title":"FROM MARGINALIZED DISCOURSES TO TENDER EMBRACES: BUILDING A NEW FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION JURISPRUDENCE IN SOUTH AFRICA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Freedom of expression; Expression (computer science); Law; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Human rights; Computer science","score_opus":0.05095967262843192,"score_gpt":0.31197599485480704,"score_spread":0.2610163222263751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1881710185","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06924502,0.006120086,0.5006549,0.004739714,0.0060284412,0.0029110054,0.0011748106,0.0005723705,0.4085537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9529265,0.000018230747,0.045679435,0.00016963182,0.0002996616,0.000080778875,0.000020453755,0.000014854116,0.0007904353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960641,0.00020874948,0.0008493483,0.0007791277,0.0010443305,0.0010543062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978759,0.0003411055,0.0003445874,0.0005331282,0.00029232685,0.0006129109],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058525323,0.00038643202,0.0005940094,0.00048059886,0.00086809724,0.00010097039,0.0010405829,0.0003102843,0.0012881331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017290834,0.00037258188,0.00023300131,0.0010427056,0.0057507996,0.0011287495,0.00040049542,0.0003491196,0.00017922957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023287021,0.00017798714,0.02285759,0.000010662469,0.000040635463,0.000037179954,0.06099787,0.000349895,0.0012616507,0.9115183,0.0023316897,0.00018368418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006273893,0.00025084618,0.0030477752,0.002942557,0.00025224572,0.000017629536,0.14036797,0.0002859987,0.009134842,0.19455135,0.6403359,0.0025389614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005031454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010201174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8836815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003346813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029333583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1882354232","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1278","title":"The (Re)Discovery of the Proportionality Principle in Sentencing in Ipeelee: Constitutionalization and the Emergence of Collective Responsibility","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Charter; Supreme court; State responsibility; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Human rights; Algorithm","score_opus":0.028789289579169576,"score_gpt":0.3352638882078174,"score_spread":0.3064745986286478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1882354232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64223605,0.20086688,0.00026752203,0.045526184,0.00089721364,0.016725902,0.00007919341,0.000036212477,0.09336485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942979,0.005049296,0.00004530425,0.0001930981,0.000015444422,0.000109300425,0.00000100041,0.000002588344,0.0002860624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99694896,0.0015927632,0.00060215004,0.00017281063,0.0005262182,0.00015707992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982172,0.00071865524,0.00031497644,0.0003227138,0.0004043623,0.000022092398],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055765472,0.00007616486,0.0002537111,0.000013404365,0.00033544935,0.00002387689,0.00033601956,0.000039892442,0.000085468564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00490179,0.00003792596,0.000071940725,0.00070797565,0.00274761,0.00027756588,0.00012964635,0.00013525426,0.0000018224687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039032915,0.000047568476,0.06093513,0.0003367371,0.000012315822,2.4519056e-7,0.0074328417,0.000023009075,0.000031092633,0.93066126,0.00033563265,0.00014515413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002646331,0.00007527183,0.3477778,0.010400144,0.00021492843,0.0000038507906,0.014194253,0.0007367684,0.00083641295,0.30782095,0.31460947,0.0006837848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010165852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019633623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6228403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012527556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007428074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1888552146","doi":"","title":"Maman bat papa","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Politique africaine","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Metis; Legislation; Ethnology; Humanities; Sociology; Law; Art","score_opus":0.02900258408788902,"score_gpt":0.31467789939342933,"score_spread":0.2856753153055403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1888552146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060380357,0.021592274,0.00036406092,0.048311405,0.0033471892,0.00037632033,0.000075922915,0.00020112115,0.91969365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7639035,0.00068939,0.0015661448,0.0013273575,0.0012730341,0.000034662542,0.0000047778685,0.000053520253,0.23114759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951094,0.0014646961,0.0005264641,0.0005856022,0.00064624246,0.0016676117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759644,0.00057765236,0.00019012144,0.0006403509,0.00021330563,0.00078212423],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013413975,0.00038751686,0.00045694,0.000117577714,0.00051769096,0.00014406662,0.00058237807,0.0004474726,0.008466557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019626583,0.00042152303,0.0002425846,0.0011718267,0.0013224047,0.00045011047,0.00009849767,0.00054276746,0.0037615378],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036045028,0.00017148018,0.0012947293,0.00004101356,0.00004019653,0.000073756346,0.058548894,0.000004079902,0.000020680744,0.9196498,0.019067656,0.0010841422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002748883,0.00008071962,0.00018783391,0.000052304295,0.000058440906,0.000010220946,0.0026708944,0.000009496702,0.00025562872,0.14055924,0.8554205,0.00041987363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050575132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040632833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83635277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006042698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036878875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W189665483","doi":"","title":"Judicial discretion to exclude evidence in terms of s 35(5) of the Constitution : S v Hena 2006 (2) SACR 33 (SE) : comments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Law; Discretion; Political science; Section (typography); Judicial discretion; Economic Justice; Judicial review; Business","score_opus":0.07030531263123174,"score_gpt":0.3675662191141264,"score_spread":0.29726090648289466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W189665483","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9586641,0.0007550444,0.007041169,0.0038158845,0.0015910034,0.00062668684,0.00007096275,0.000016971284,0.02741814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978916,0.000031596035,0.0012825715,0.0003399388,0.00037728396,0.0000017475804,3.3286753e-7,0.000006479118,0.00006842806],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966456,0.00055596494,0.00095625455,0.00018136119,0.0012545569,0.00040623258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771667,0.00034807657,0.0010545604,0.00025817228,0.00038539513,0.00023711206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001840799,0.00016617164,0.00044620526,0.00024662993,0.00024009458,0.00004171661,0.00090746983,0.00009853272,0.000049225404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002992328,0.00012687789,0.0001795917,0.0008879917,0.0008241883,0.00040872913,0.000067654095,0.00039983058,0.0000057857337],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001713897,0.00047164672,0.0155288065,0.000241201,0.00004428806,0.000066105684,0.9511866,0.0017309418,0.003317975,0.017452374,0.0006495051,0.0075966786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004520466,0.0053285947,0.14127544,0.01110077,0.006401751,0.000078297955,0.78599703,0.00017355563,0.008179709,0.01431165,0.021020105,0.0016126351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005573976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017261266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16518955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002619174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004062929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.517393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1899158120","doi":"","title":"R v Kapp : a model for South African affirmative action jurisprudence?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Judgement; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Remedial education; Order (exchange); Dual (grammatical number); Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.030670520803296717,"score_gpt":0.3434101125210649,"score_spread":0.31273959171776816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1899158120","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09524455,0.004090538,0.82067925,0.02520564,0.0009768861,0.0015796012,0.000026360925,0.00043781791,0.051759366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895614,0.00040957145,0.0011861463,0.00016463695,0.0008292733,0.000015250076,0.0000012870205,0.000015506863,0.007816941],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963019,0.00015230385,0.0002710706,0.00022659624,0.0005386745,0.0025094468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913883,0.00007518551,0.0002523256,0.00014402847,0.00020558047,0.0001840216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002329403,0.00015704136,0.00020148397,0.00012252593,0.0010467977,0.0001588188,0.00049196515,0.00013193287,0.00001751965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033029224,0.00014527046,0.00017476088,0.0003468961,0.00013318592,0.00052912266,0.000016176467,0.0012174317,0.000041640847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018910535,0.00011332704,0.00007572364,0.0000033534743,0.000082325285,0.000001710282,0.31517673,0.0010755478,0.00014600715,0.6462748,0.0006088207,0.036252566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072003185,0.00047962592,0.00004205743,0.000017116532,0.0000713911,0.000013495207,0.07352111,0.007300027,0.00005178556,0.8776966,0.03974354,0.00034325253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000673508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011536737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89431685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019624864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003983934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8051228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1907220870","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v32i2.2940","title":"The role of public policy in the nonenforcement of foreign judgments arising from gambling debts in South African courts: A comparative overview","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comity; Enforcement; Debt; Political science; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Foreign policy; Jurisdiction; Public administration; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.1112529788754521,"score_gpt":0.4212934574958366,"score_spread":0.3100404786203845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1907220870","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9515984,0.0030244207,0.0023500293,0.0018664371,0.00030451777,0.0008611076,0.000019947738,0.000009086164,0.039966024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987638,0.00009537091,0.0007949361,0.00011681234,0.00020057333,0.000008559094,4.4493854e-7,0.0000044775456,0.000015031354],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959917,0.0002809904,0.00080144074,0.00021162606,0.0018828931,0.0008313456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973903,0.0013361425,0.00058011117,0.00020805156,0.0002466328,0.00023880572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014842546,0.000115481664,0.0002820524,0.00029154235,0.0010297484,0.00027994905,0.001584543,0.00006349773,0.000016441289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002442046,0.000067315406,0.000114861505,0.0021151165,0.0017741151,0.00050318084,0.00013206313,0.00036783834,0.0000016118437],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015991033,0.00036552167,0.04318824,0.000011609112,0.000028074175,0.000008409354,0.5338992,0.0001770825,0.0009840725,0.40319347,0.00005742808,0.017926993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024751055,0.00061071216,0.061560575,0.0005613041,0.000052727253,0.000006151278,0.48474628,0.004028187,0.004090306,0.28221327,0.15908338,0.00057200395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003932771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026526104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15902595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055865047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012892913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79200965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1914365750","doi":"10.4102/jef.v5i2.299","title":"‘n Ondersoek na die inkomstebelastinghantering van beëindigingsboetes betaalbaar deur verhuurders by die voortydige beëindiging van ‘n huurooreenkoms","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lease; Economics; Context (archaeology); Profit (economics); Database transaction; Income tax; Business; Finance; Public economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.023011874141124676,"score_gpt":0.28262192197389374,"score_spread":0.2596100478327691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1914365750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9551184,0.006569477,0.00070598,0.0005808835,0.00224891,0.00015862561,0.0000145365375,0.00003427799,0.03456887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963947,0.0005716112,0.00082710397,0.00020850035,0.0015152048,0.0000023948394,7.5380956e-7,0.00001604192,0.00046366814],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743426,0.00011254307,0.00069816987,0.00030752286,0.00043512613,0.0010123565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99823624,0.00031051313,0.0008052929,0.00010092984,0.000060029466,0.00048700275],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024146705,0.00024531435,0.0004661604,0.00025263932,0.001615085,0.00034008923,0.00066850195,0.00014598985,0.000115886054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039286877,0.00022129093,0.00016245407,0.00020489802,0.0014001965,0.002539717,0.00014312813,0.00034901898,0.000039506453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110781635,0.00025576042,0.5544862,0.00006315014,0.00013449673,0.00005817956,0.31535572,0.0002680157,0.00083822955,0.022438077,0.003353624,0.102637775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011248535,0.00067841366,0.011887853,0.0002540588,0.00013717744,0.000034334807,0.024500407,0.00020064155,0.000995991,0.006203646,0.95288575,0.0010968735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005413586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028764064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94953215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027015177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036000978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1930724199","doi":"","title":"Pillay and Others v S : trial fairness; the doctrine of discoverability; and the concept of 'detriment' - the impact of the Canadian s 24 (2) provision on South African s 35 (5) jurisprudence : comment","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discoverability; Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Law; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.0259280608459404,"score_gpt":0.3247955542952449,"score_spread":0.2988674934493045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1930724199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9793216,0.0017930679,0.00006074774,0.01248306,0.0004400642,0.0013622579,0.00016398342,0.0000054821335,0.004369722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999136,0.00003813927,0.00007764657,0.00020580154,0.00042711355,0.000007702016,3.1631996e-7,0.000015828746,0.00009147019],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99533695,0.0015979606,0.0009692851,0.00023825633,0.0013714932,0.00048605414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99485034,0.002116808,0.0017216931,0.0005706302,0.00043610216,0.00030443692],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004217736,0.00026705736,0.00061712996,0.00013722917,0.00087277533,0.00013042112,0.0013312037,0.000092755545,0.000045856952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025156357,0.000109095425,0.00040069074,0.00064617547,0.004995409,0.00018803866,0.00016246048,0.0006513127,6.52951e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010231102,0.00015816693,0.001138004,0.000059285558,0.0002214652,0.0000031403986,0.9736727,0.0010244462,0.00003193463,0.010745772,0.000289713,0.0024242767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018375527,0.0040866155,0.0049875807,0.0003983523,0.0039098435,0.000017922797,0.9537827,0.0002120308,0.00076914823,0.0012769412,0.01173711,0.00044624633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037214406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00617249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031041915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033884821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001445448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99771243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1931154280","doi":"","title":"'Tagging' bills in Parliament : section 75 or section 76?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Constitution; Jurisdiction; Law; Section (typography); Competence (human resources); Constitutional court; Government (linguistics); Political science; Computer science; Economics; Politics; Management","score_opus":0.020530151905430602,"score_gpt":0.24766032892015674,"score_spread":0.22713017701472615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1931154280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50419873,0.00008011985,0.0006464747,0.0022258367,0.0005369555,0.0008714895,0.0000466543,0.0000959949,0.49129772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91945153,0.00014677891,0.0016496176,0.00003851005,0.000113221984,1.072449e-7,0.000017298918,0.0000101688665,0.07857278],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998075,0.00027369574,0.00019282853,0.00045397092,0.0005878097,0.00041667104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998756,0.00011837646,0.0003699299,0.00033961385,0.00026332596,0.00015277197],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060410495,0.00018445856,0.00045043105,0.0003559293,0.00071226846,0.000056597983,0.0011721966,0.0002782662,0.0068355496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043734442,0.0002380392,0.00015661976,0.0010243821,0.0006324381,0.0014130167,0.0004508057,0.00026321778,0.00004447502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0074479952,0.003409909,0.06092379,0.00034586908,0.00062728825,0.0011598793,0.60045594,0.0040898486,0.0056955568,0.03027098,0.24398367,0.041589268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022346934,0.00023542656,0.010244437,0.00009932321,0.00011270846,0.0000020542416,0.11221054,0.00017808453,0.00011983711,0.00029621366,0.8738703,0.00039636515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.252945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13667461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6298866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006974759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041288085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1932747739","doi":"","title":"The First Years of the South African Constitutional Court","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional court; Constitution; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Dignity; Democracy; High Court; Human rights; Charter; Sociology","score_opus":0.05270734368583768,"score_gpt":0.30115180388678925,"score_spread":0.24844446020095157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1932747739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008850046,0.13101593,0.002024517,0.08958267,0.005722994,0.0066535873,0.0057199565,0.00045136348,0.74997896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99027306,0.00615278,0.000078680125,0.00193801,0.00036883808,0.00010091645,0.00001677486,0.000010771617,0.0010601432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99540126,0.0007150182,0.00081000995,0.0004635925,0.0019212425,0.0006888512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99516857,0.0016786258,0.00053085963,0.00095379807,0.0014530729,0.00021509886],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019397134,0.00033694357,0.00052785815,0.000032342865,0.0049511977,0.0001085471,0.0021435255,0.00014404098,0.0004768396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002824377,0.00019878663,0.0004082537,0.0006486695,0.056633882,0.00038281115,0.00043122267,0.00060179,0.00019429464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003418664,0.000050460294,0.0006698739,0.000049273767,0.000061943436,0.00003371519,0.005133958,0.000044341967,0.0000026493697,0.9791598,0.014640969,0.00011888503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002498197,0.000040979805,0.0005675092,0.0005890418,0.00013796323,0.00015454079,0.0016893356,0.000015961554,0.000014285496,0.003087914,0.9931549,0.0002977403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026847022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002778558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.981423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020451342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035691115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1933453569","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v36i2.3018","title":"Pecuniary interests and the rule against adjudicative bias: The automatic disqualification or objective reasonable approach?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Constitution; Theology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.09870584771046623,"score_gpt":0.3610285210144931,"score_spread":0.2623226733040269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1933453569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5863517,0.0031031757,0.017665919,0.031233557,0.0028631496,0.0051207813,0.00004412829,0.00032928013,0.35328835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941776,0.0001696267,0.003797834,0.000541546,0.00029871988,0.00009059198,4.997878e-7,0.000009582783,0.0009140339],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715024,0.00062449544,0.00037615545,0.00031908613,0.0009902607,0.0005397517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973546,0.001297231,0.00039908112,0.0002955335,0.00031409558,0.00033944528],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009413562,0.00013526235,0.00020621672,0.00008121815,0.004025635,0.00046873649,0.0015348862,0.000072665374,0.00006729116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009279433,0.000059385326,0.00010064152,0.00097287237,0.008064122,0.00076870504,0.00020178774,0.0004330552,0.000019817626],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033495927,0.00020548137,0.00058163574,0.000017099754,0.000041797197,0.0000055632913,0.74254936,0.0000028647733,0.000047839716,0.22622797,0.0018300526,0.02815537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0059956787,0.00091153174,0.049949575,0.0005190659,0.00042560606,0.00018768459,0.3768442,0.030889738,0.00094219024,0.2814246,0.25035697,0.0015531451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030018148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006222424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4078259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022745044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088754087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1934157515","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v33i1.2951","title":"Gronde vir die weiering van toegang tot inligting soos van toepassing op openbare instellings (deel II)","year":2008,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.053831095083939316,"score_gpt":0.354117746080132,"score_spread":0.3002866509961927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1934157515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90873367,0.0040028985,0.0073485635,0.0057808533,0.008640945,0.0012221326,0.000046026224,0.0002481449,0.06397679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97759455,0.0004378947,0.010099132,0.00050789287,0.0045177406,0.000020103409,0.0000025123109,0.00007474051,0.006745439],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894864,0.0002929449,0.0016907969,0.0013596262,0.004046425,0.0031238312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947978,0.0006577342,0.0011114199,0.000580972,0.0007847578,0.0020672833],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006300756,0.0006702947,0.00092342834,0.0004738913,0.02185718,0.0022213224,0.0038246904,0.00045845757,0.00035465608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040504276,0.0006060572,0.0006123549,0.0026329393,0.0052580666,0.004416014,0.0013758964,0.001968123,0.00016131635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008673221,0.003200564,0.017958231,0.0006203513,0.00035573213,0.0027465292,0.6799039,0.00926269,0.039733436,0.026413731,0.022732569,0.19620492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022479016,0.0011434505,0.0019912883,0.0013383203,0.00020666057,0.0004010318,0.011212752,0.015718285,0.007747646,0.010789409,0.9447154,0.0024878506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007217455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013976896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9219828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001838289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031802303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1937304692","doi":"","title":"The Commission for Equality and Human Rights (part 1)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Research Online (The Open University)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Human rights; Political science; Law; Fundamental rights; Social equality; International human rights law; Gender equality; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.26729734920337345,"score_gpt":0.5040934428365701,"score_spread":0.23679609363319665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1937304692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0117211575,0.00006080414,0.000017960092,0.04442228,0.00006647571,0.0028051266,0.000050939787,0.000019376004,0.9408359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41218585,0.000047469497,0.0013724101,0.00005183938,0.00031327864,0.000008496246,0.000011219811,0.000009307574,0.58600014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671173,0.0017005231,0.00014717526,0.0003286272,0.00057605724,0.00053586863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972401,0.0015010694,0.00007166587,0.00055177056,0.00038643018,0.00024894293],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066141966,0.00009075498,0.00015529293,0.000068801695,0.012995881,0.0014968289,0.0056632366,0.0000821587,0.00031154812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043664846,0.00005693106,0.000040756,0.0006576232,0.0013775834,0.00089579064,0.003714155,0.00039742902,0.00004767058],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019529273,0.00016564813,0.00024662816,0.0000037587656,0.000028346003,0.0000052695664,0.010038957,0.0000018016448,0.000022203862,0.9309818,0.051684562,0.0066257147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005729296,0.00007737608,0.00014473849,0.000020697611,0.000008715139,1.4075019e-7,0.007318659,0.00003111667,0.000038628496,0.0072623873,0.9844292,0.00009540316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028604684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10060499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9327446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000241307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023170307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W193918409","doi":"","title":"The role of a modern central bank in managing consumer bankruptcies and corporate failures : a South African public-law angle of incidence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interest rate; Economics; Monetary policy; Financial system; Business; Finance; Monetary economics","score_opus":0.015143636976491657,"score_gpt":0.21829974192215612,"score_spread":0.20315610494566447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W193918409","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9265585,0.0027403762,0.0004950129,0.0013321242,0.0003363357,0.0003122069,0.000025853633,0.000038139075,0.06816143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998828,0.000045063385,0.0008134289,0.0000057035095,0.000046524343,3.463314e-7,0.0000012134499,0.0000026091147,0.00025711593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986776,0.0001615213,0.00017283505,0.0002043614,0.0005315785,0.00025208178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893963,0.00013634947,0.0003717723,0.00019003481,0.0002537129,0.00010850874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037893717,0.0000943388,0.00020389642,0.00008450468,0.0007111461,0.000039609295,0.0004014813,0.00009302567,0.000006053301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015707209,0.00009907679,0.00006237006,0.00034268256,0.0024727948,0.000568822,0.000098059594,0.00013629025,5.462332e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014074486,0.00006533006,0.050679196,0.00001786327,0.000037788115,0.000027363003,0.13311607,0.00040794568,0.0019127675,0.81280196,0.00002855187,0.0007643964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031699974,0.0005685387,0.18808417,0.0007697145,0.00031103505,0.000023187915,0.38997054,0.007590488,0.0040700305,0.21203719,0.19205144,0.0013536531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005770216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027471061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6007648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017000572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049471896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91111153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1940355904","doi":"10.25071/1920-7336.21368","title":"Insiders but Outsiders: The Struggle for the Inclusion of Asylum Seekers and Refugees in South Africa","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Refuge Canada s Journal on Refuge","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Safeguarding; Comprehensive Plan of Action; Political science; Legislation; Inclusion (mineral); Politics; Human rights; Law; Sociology; Gender studies; Medicine","score_opus":0.01967761990742772,"score_gpt":0.2965545827600229,"score_spread":0.27687696285259517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1940355904","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98730206,0.006048981,0.00012390714,0.003775705,0.0009707282,0.00069057,0.00005442907,0.0000207898,0.0010128445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970832,0.00007093185,0.00027615402,0.0012003904,0.00039232368,0.000009380615,0.0000011207583,0.000028686689,0.0009378062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658996,0.00032596357,0.0006902102,0.00027829153,0.0013280726,0.0007874967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99715424,0.0014170209,0.00051937293,0.00036685728,0.00023082714,0.00031170572],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039726947,0.00022870454,0.00034522347,0.00017667154,0.0019385006,0.00011102984,0.00078605604,0.00016104804,0.000044413733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015351885,0.0001249408,0.00011958675,0.0005760559,0.00056047406,0.00019373675,0.00026120865,0.00073717476,0.000001158394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041744765,0.00061352,0.023592744,0.00036876355,0.0011725049,0.001414281,0.44055226,0.0020550897,0.00180857,0.47761312,0.021641333,0.02499334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059414975,0.00011472548,0.0010819989,0.000087945074,0.000035143345,0.0000069034127,0.0037594002,0.000034726745,0.00019006971,0.0014781947,0.9924333,0.00018345269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007828465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12322058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97079194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008510027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013124823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1941609635","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1000","title":"Don't Get Enough Credit: The Need for an Impartial Consumer Credit Report Appeal Tribunal in Ontario","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Ontario","keywords":"Appeal; Tribunal; Liability; Business; Credit history; Law; Law and economics; Accounting; Political science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.04621000422786614,"score_gpt":0.36957719301974,"score_spread":0.32336718879187387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1941609635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8596807,0.0002874144,0.00007120623,0.054757733,0.0014335015,0.0005869983,0.000034465007,0.000032180335,0.083115764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98706675,0.000012037133,0.00018123002,0.0018160371,0.010106425,0.0000033991369,0.0000034732118,0.000008514505,0.0008021448],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801433,0.00023330052,0.00061359664,0.00013937149,0.0005238055,0.00047559425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988839,0.00012384188,0.00045797369,0.000102514285,0.00022786991,0.00020387542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019424878,0.00013208886,0.000372401,0.00008241205,0.0008677228,0.00021755647,0.00032213973,0.00019653076,0.000035162066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003044469,0.00009879662,0.00017996356,0.00016257519,0.0005389735,0.00047798926,0.000024813966,0.0004724809,0.0000012955037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006625955,0.00030944374,0.0031499176,0.0000064997744,0.000080717226,0.00015480738,0.5944231,0.0000057993316,0.00010563053,0.38462564,0.013644638,0.0028311734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014379753,0.00043024778,0.008724668,0.0000115749135,0.000060186117,0.000050706614,0.0058191726,0.000004004384,0.00002083779,0.02916574,0.9541008,0.00017411784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19118871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17405744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94045615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035451556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014562517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84101385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1950670188","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9388.2010.00663.x","title":"Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation: The British Columbia Experience","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of European Community & International Environmental Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; Legislation; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.04874813427220085,"score_gpt":0.3173546946823896,"score_spread":0.2686065604101887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1950670188","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34546307,0.002183614,0.0000019646427,0.000791354,0.00035892357,0.00022572652,0.00004758591,0.000029625076,0.65089816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887197,0.006790853,0.000113329785,0.0022756106,0.00017814722,0.000020275873,0.00007016516,0.00001625068,0.0018156675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705726,0.0015758974,0.00040240076,0.00013434679,0.0006258829,0.00020419652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887204,0.00020551794,0.00023252399,0.0005259856,0.000047416786,0.00011648665],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018579282,0.00008742034,0.00015217124,0.000007653701,0.0016948086,0.00065339444,0.001720521,0.000030854007,0.0031821518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030236063,0.000101466125,0.000111163965,0.0001050241,0.0016765251,0.00035927055,0.00043036113,0.00058681256,0.0001988557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020416965,0.005856053,0.06519788,0.0011837559,0.00052047934,0.00015712106,0.10906769,0.000013574233,0.0065465313,0.655164,0.01582142,0.14045106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101397425,0.000019673305,0.0063044317,0.00039039852,0.000012543931,0.0000035329788,0.0016890521,0.000004841083,0.000012308874,0.00023489578,0.99110204,0.00012486569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01060551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042922866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97528064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007202005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028007527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W195398862","doi":"","title":"HIV / AIDS and equal opportunities in the workplace : the implications of the Employment Equity Act","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Statutory law; Legislation; Equity (law); Affirmative action; Political science; Employment discrimination; Equal employment opportunity; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.16456644923569405,"score_gpt":0.3841107808934568,"score_spread":0.21954433165776274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W195398862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4229782,0.0022835599,0.000111415946,0.019578524,0.00016236011,0.00027183423,0.0001134974,0.0000058671117,0.55449474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996217,0.00012204497,0.000057676483,0.00025686165,0.00014456529,0.000006007452,6.7810714e-7,0.0000033993645,0.0031917384],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860436,0.00042541302,0.00032934398,0.000081685735,0.00042719126,0.00013203763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989082,0.0004919903,0.00025379958,0.00012500175,0.0001739377,0.00004702262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001066765,0.00008369307,0.00015121537,0.000032437467,0.0004274005,0.00012072066,0.00078279135,0.000032477677,0.0002880524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054285858,0.000040524632,0.00006830559,0.00014356298,0.00093680766,0.00017032893,0.000096470205,0.0002328387,0.0000066463735],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009288949,0.00011957348,0.008532528,0.0000022128606,0.00008873047,0.0000016745607,0.54225165,0.00004559363,0.000029669776,0.44346714,0.0013447308,0.00402363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054546434,0.00013051866,0.0074896454,0.00009423976,0.000054446147,0.000015342295,0.21593153,0.000036969835,0.00003766968,0.051590595,0.72393656,0.00013703597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015232242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003582532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7225918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004814738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007393873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34517068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964921481","doi":"","title":"The Protective Function and Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Duty; State (computer science); Constitution; Law; Constitutional law; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Government (linguistics); Fundamental rights; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.006188439553772255,"score_gpt":0.2321878651487161,"score_spread":0.22599942559494382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964921481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9779259,0.007161406,0.0002487259,0.0017120783,0.0010467755,0.00042311003,0.000002284363,0.000007367121,0.011472373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988971,0.000100531644,0.000003865161,0.000010092417,0.00042831656,0.0000035567523,5.072751e-8,0.0000033549138,0.0005531432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987269,0.00019469067,0.0001060824,0.000051249506,0.0002025517,0.00071852136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960196,0.000043510816,0.00012475623,0.000067188244,0.00008356573,0.000079047764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018528671,0.000046778503,0.00006265084,0.000033286673,0.00115844,0.000030388568,0.00010361995,0.00006144525,0.000006887626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080451326,0.000025498963,0.000027585087,0.00013275964,0.0003959546,0.00018015613,0.000013249252,0.00057882647,7.251558e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007122561,0.000029643114,0.04332584,0.000005358718,0.00017219623,9.155114e-8,0.09422812,0.0000014041423,0.0004484689,0.85256195,0.00011203309,0.009043688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053676224,0.0003564208,0.06572133,0.000028540277,0.00009812335,0.00003769426,0.020117769,0.0000135137025,0.00033776026,0.83518827,0.07740785,0.00015598336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14971246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78522617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6355137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043274768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079810206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89099014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967825996","doi":"10.4102/jtscm.v7i1.96","title":"Public transport policy and performance: The results of a South African public opinion poll","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Transport Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Public opinion; Government (linguistics); Public transport; Public administration; Political science; Public policy; Constitution; Democracy; Population; Politics; Economic growth; Business; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.027912949952342125,"score_gpt":0.26081505109635095,"score_spread":0.23290210114400883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967825996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.824518,0.0016672527,0.0004447051,0.08109785,0.00055696274,0.0012067341,0.00006097009,0.00004114175,0.090406336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99536204,0.0021784732,0.0004384896,0.00018513233,0.00037949404,0.000012565405,0.000005842789,0.000013426489,0.0014245148],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977163,0.00010856058,0.00073807983,0.00019058406,0.0007978444,0.00044859707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988161,0.00005968255,0.00040617748,0.00021083502,0.00021724831,0.0002899831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020850957,0.00016807455,0.00032905737,0.00038770388,0.00034989644,0.00009678903,0.00048704492,0.00008313847,0.00008630378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043360982,0.00011364416,0.00012759313,0.0006019473,0.0005483095,0.00064058544,0.000027359414,0.00023783132,0.0000023081889],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044964897,0.00038061122,0.37764308,0.00047726062,0.0006172844,0.00005066354,0.49197248,0.000036779224,0.000019117044,0.06250251,0.002121999,0.06372855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021071285,0.0003882305,0.41941905,0.00011320668,0.00010708741,0.000007029343,0.036972515,0.00005869568,0.0000073701276,0.0011970175,0.5393463,0.0002764289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088898133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015826893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53722423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063802894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001611315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46342742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969543367","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00275.x","title":"Postapartheid Justice: Can Cosmopolitanism and Nation-Building Be Reconciled?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Harm; Sovereignty; Crimes against humanity; International law; War crime","score_opus":0.03441776350165194,"score_gpt":0.33687557103262505,"score_spread":0.3024578075309731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969543367","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028151306,0.6797678,0.0000131081615,0.027563453,0.00060283125,0.0009798688,0.000078239114,0.00025510756,0.28792447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38849598,0.54949886,0.0096379705,0.041599505,0.0019323562,0.00010696787,0.00004809779,0.00006753579,0.008612716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828124,0.00020319226,0.00033758022,0.00030284515,0.0004458096,0.0004293216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906516,0.00024206795,0.00015571178,0.0002246162,0.00016787094,0.00014459655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011805539,0.00015789845,0.00032837136,0.0000013876578,0.0009479285,0.00012077198,0.00024956182,0.000121205274,0.00021661031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019750102,0.0001507234,0.00019181144,0.0003134931,0.00055071217,0.00020647865,0.00006525452,0.00019382148,0.000025479876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.570893e-7,0.000022499707,0.00014627076,0.00084136456,0.000021535081,0.0000022592956,0.00879108,3.9381933e-7,0.000031534157,0.9297287,0.05919958,0.0012142566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092854956,0.000010864042,0.000017743288,0.00048549214,0.00016032765,0.0000013339605,0.0010855418,0.0000052948326,0.000020195886,0.011396691,0.9865269,0.0001967285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034356052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001529454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92732733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002498251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001400248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72907954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969839827","doi":"10.4314/jjs.v28i1.27135","title":"Groepsgedingvoering - die voorstel van die Suid-Afrikaanse Regskommissie vir die sertifisering van 'n groepsgeding","year":2004,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Die (integrated circuit); Theology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.04650540702735572,"score_gpt":0.35488767523740283,"score_spread":0.3083822682100471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969839827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83001846,0.012104315,0.018627819,0.02197735,0.031092945,0.0027031868,0.00013764488,0.0008684931,0.08246979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794314,0.00090482226,0.0060282205,0.00037157667,0.006758897,0.000045380635,0.0000031967506,0.00014442437,0.0063120876],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98579764,0.00029955362,0.002182138,0.0019293722,0.00520523,0.0045860563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99256045,0.0008117896,0.0011719153,0.0008862793,0.0009978388,0.0035717208],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010925447,0.0010371336,0.0012086821,0.0007509544,0.011610223,0.004086745,0.004547365,0.0006448199,0.00034162702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007018928,0.00091965555,0.0009734043,0.002284818,0.0051797135,0.0050276266,0.0011521996,0.0025501116,0.00033496867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027768563,0.0059074685,0.020743355,0.0019912387,0.001051754,0.008467478,0.54504883,0.023644673,0.153463,0.08907372,0.01008255,0.13774908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004102279,0.0013268318,0.0030445736,0.00232305,0.00048978947,0.00022886797,0.008832515,0.0019675547,0.017160986,0.07727047,0.8799858,0.0032673008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010644681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037904983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8699032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036389427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026721307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973913384","doi":"10.1515/ldr-2013-0022","title":"Assessing the Organisation pour l’harmonisation en Afrique du droit des affaires’s Contributions to Poverty Reduction in Africa: A Grounded Outlook","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law and Development Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Political science; Poverty reduction; Member states; Sustainable development; Political economy; Welfare economics; Development economics; Sociology; Business; Law; Economics; International trade; European union","score_opus":0.0340829679989631,"score_gpt":0.3254963322359437,"score_spread":0.2914133642369806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973913384","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16226926,0.062274806,0.014698387,0.44938752,0.0010223616,0.012881774,0.000011226332,0.00054790766,0.29690674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931162,0.002973516,0.0015753952,0.0014321315,0.00012219218,0.00023869198,0.00000536916,0.000008317107,0.00052817486],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835175,0.0005999325,0.00031480234,0.00018161978,0.000278238,0.00027367688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992932,0.00021548795,0.00010741394,0.00015025325,0.00015673508,0.00007689605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023604233,0.00011329385,0.00018160284,0.000024291328,0.0010382754,0.00033906326,0.00021689349,0.000057925678,0.00018484991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005023684,0.00006903984,0.000026250988,0.00031963646,0.00017884087,0.0005718645,0.000077660894,0.00013443716,0.00020247331],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074750624,0.00012621398,0.0009612948,0.00029858443,0.000054729164,0.000002281305,0.47091338,0.0000041690296,0.0006050087,0.4602974,0.009338874,0.05739057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032081347,0.000019099316,0.01720886,0.0012231324,0.00005880285,0.000008119348,0.022624861,0.000015038335,0.0003363742,0.06074212,0.8970684,0.0003744023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001647041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061716017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8877295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005668376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027288983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.798568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978776847","doi":"10.1093/ijrl/eep026","title":"Recognizing Socio-Economic Refugees in South Africa: a Principled and Rights-Based Approach to Section 3(b) of the Refugees Act","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Refugee Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Section (typography); Political science; Law; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.02070061146262324,"score_gpt":0.3155815534253494,"score_spread":0.29488094196272613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978776847","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9625971,0.00025266423,0.00026329886,0.0024031103,0.0012405781,0.00025470575,0.00001483364,0.000020579635,0.032953132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956998,0.0000030353528,0.00309432,0.00022236662,0.0006558705,0.000003572482,8.892181e-7,0.000009249135,0.0003108878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979615,0.00026872515,0.00063079107,0.00020312448,0.0007022703,0.00023358029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986897,0.00012196185,0.0006167967,0.00015386283,0.00029875626,0.00011888693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013168991,0.00013564114,0.00028343816,0.00023121799,0.0001926401,0.00011701161,0.00076993695,0.00012965914,0.000022906963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027967733,0.00009947871,0.00015578362,0.00021778661,0.00024509674,0.00037862675,0.0000682961,0.00034379208,0.000004540819],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018102913,0.0010360588,0.02423298,0.000040923696,0.0005068383,0.000058703874,0.32017225,0.00667877,0.003390107,0.63459235,0.0007793721,0.006701357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027436002,0.00040545614,0.010294937,0.00047450652,0.00008407609,0.000024894996,0.0025542744,0.00035040395,0.0022576998,0.031637605,0.94868207,0.0004904631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013439677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026480568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9479027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005766287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022646891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40566242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979366558","doi":"10.7202/042249ar","title":"La protection sociale et judiciaire de la jeunesse, premier pas vers une réforme globale du droit de la famille","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Legislator; Statute; Statutory law; Political science; Law; Legislation; Family law; Context (archaeology); Legislature; Humanities; Civil code; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.007688240797605933,"score_gpt":0.2658689147577636,"score_spread":0.25818067396015765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979366558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5551448,0.00020382245,0.0034321728,0.0020649733,0.00013763663,0.00038791058,0.000020612155,0.00032354012,0.43828455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987444,0.00015843878,0.0020832017,0.000797051,0.0006118245,0.00010226775,0.0000075090907,0.000046881574,0.008748834],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970365,0.001029769,0.00025809166,0.0003568256,0.00052699755,0.00079179305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998744,0.00049358304,0.00016097735,0.00024015259,0.00008700308,0.00027430063],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025454015,0.00021801548,0.00026607988,0.00009163571,0.00089979236,0.0002490486,0.00048118064,0.000955876,0.00008552084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011630697,0.00025895276,0.00016811573,0.00068823475,0.0018381972,0.00042244967,0.000062089086,0.00090722955,0.00008443739],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015566376,0.00034156442,0.012780567,0.00007674019,0.0001564797,0.00014816922,0.49910527,0.000934115,0.0008377047,0.42106336,0.005979362,0.05842098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007960518,0.000045748577,0.005819331,0.000054417047,0.00007376823,0.000024574576,0.019241292,0.0002677642,0.00038312012,0.060808636,0.9120692,0.00041610366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011636853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057029636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90608984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00533219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007662049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979388471","doi":"10.1080/03056240108704538","title":"The Lesotho highlands corruption trial: who has been airbrushed from the dock?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of African Political Economy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Language change; Political science; Government (linguistics); Geography; Economic history; Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04535999257637842,"score_gpt":0.3380758899715409,"score_spread":0.2927158973951625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979388471","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013579108,0.04328965,0.00012080986,0.15018411,0.00050093286,0.0014906868,0.000059595717,0.00008510775,0.8029112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784336,0.011808297,0.00016291306,0.005683884,0.0019653551,0.00014293604,0.000013856039,0.000025245015,0.0017638959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969698,0.0008363709,0.00077710854,0.0003136716,0.00035866947,0.0007443376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958353,0.0026849175,0.0003023253,0.0006860662,0.0001631053,0.0003283059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001920727,0.0001896002,0.00058077124,0.000024249965,0.0007670185,0.00019729935,0.0010206802,0.000105723004,0.0008622051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018112293,0.00011129737,0.00031183276,0.00035774807,0.0016372756,0.00019188998,0.00012315244,0.00026207624,0.00023045544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001882754,0.000058521353,0.0005106808,0.00008789657,0.00005869939,0.000003033314,0.0035207556,1.3519535e-7,3.1074518e-7,0.97309196,0.012462681,0.010017059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011693768,0.000067880144,0.0002584531,0.00041041445,0.00009451702,6.6665973e-7,0.0013230073,0.000006740348,0.000002851104,0.025892703,0.9706278,0.00014558104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034558573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002465922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9770757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002417899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041761628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9440541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979641765","doi":"10.1353/ccj.2006.0016","title":"Gone But Not Forgotten: Should Judges Be Allowed to Remedy by Re-sentencing?","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Prison; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12624068618915282,"score_gpt":0.331878685057201,"score_spread":0.20563799886804815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979641765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8758669,0.019557443,0.0019557476,0.083163135,0.0038620278,0.00047541503,0.00042056243,0.00006262687,0.014636158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9607952,0.0013881759,0.0075702546,0.018012624,0.002136,0.000034603396,0.000038438044,0.00013169643,0.0098929955],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904519,0.0016411038,0.0017459892,0.0011037115,0.0004397663,0.004617546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98943233,0.0026244142,0.0010105016,0.0007736029,0.001314756,0.004844412],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037937455,0.000985814,0.0014963361,0.0010814093,0.0014445885,0.00039908118,0.0020210352,0.001840713,0.0005708241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010536451,0.0011418926,0.00041187656,0.00050304394,0.0037420525,0.0007691663,0.00019348906,0.0029070321,0.00006418071],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010150035,0.00053941854,0.0039040134,0.006142833,0.0007469002,0.03257108,0.3837252,0.0016408438,0.0075270855,0.316368,0.21197781,0.033841796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015387502,0.0018855907,0.0068472433,0.00072011235,0.019913105,0.0044525615,0.45550764,0.00022528271,0.0014392602,0.0050178473,0.5006867,0.0017658864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2723344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47369686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31135017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041089985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077166045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981031201","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2001/v4i1a2878","title":"Utilizing constitutional values in constitutional comparison","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proscription; Constitutional law; Affirmative action; Law; Political science; Public law; Mores; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03607853444442566,"score_gpt":0.3597977281514343,"score_spread":0.32371919370700863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981031201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15220737,0.031006722,0.010091903,0.016963663,0.0056300825,0.0023052427,0.00010706466,0.0009070572,0.7807809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99256134,0.0012294444,0.0017503198,0.00024671163,0.0024739206,0.000085185835,0.000028028824,0.0000689168,0.0015561215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893344,0.0010911005,0.0018215325,0.0011724386,0.002527693,0.004052841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99439746,0.0006097389,0.0017117164,0.0015220969,0.00072781974,0.0010311785],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053341165,0.00089307,0.0013670644,0.00044690122,0.010339539,0.002253744,0.003392465,0.0007098112,0.0007907165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025800897,0.00092245283,0.0006464323,0.0004998485,0.018153533,0.0031241586,0.00048316625,0.004135021,0.00031696536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025425002,0.0003879732,0.022203285,0.000020578284,0.0003034471,0.00019079928,0.0068534124,0.00045969646,0.00022631287,0.9653724,0.0010465431,0.0026813454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00535009,0.00042331408,0.0015946827,0.00040801568,0.00025216112,0.00033065205,0.011496974,0.0004571343,0.0009033418,0.10744515,0.86960894,0.0017295288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033946685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013064977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8685624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005105027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055515296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981637557","doi":"10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.10.003","title":"WITHDRAWN: The Challenges of Poverty Reduction and Environmental Conservation in South Africa's Extended Public Works Programme (EPWP)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Geography","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":true,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty reduction; Geography; Poverty; Reduction (mathematics); Environmental protection; Environmental planning; Socioeconomics; Economic growth; Sociology; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.027539686959031088,"score_gpt":0.2312380130161004,"score_spread":0.2036983260570693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981637557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93134373,0.01240238,0.000047092617,0.004462812,0.0001695483,0.0013128081,0.000010155016,0.00012918767,0.05012229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99848217,0.00081597833,0.00038659666,0.000050957737,0.00009302815,0.00012392098,0.0000061547385,0.000010998913,0.000030174597],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856234,0.000120789344,0.00022917648,0.00029242347,0.0004239898,0.00037127468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942505,0.00007569509,0.00015512324,0.00023336057,0.000020286634,0.000090457055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055007584,0.0001285199,0.00016932297,0.00015355616,0.00038376992,0.00004498997,0.00021415773,0.00013693834,0.000020985664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032507076,0.00010266201,0.000057333236,0.00059570157,0.0014564594,0.00019291096,0.00006067909,0.0001967739,0.0000042007796],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014007429,0.00054637244,0.0849883,0.000023467483,0.00009618055,0.00000591498,0.76053655,0.0000044973235,0.0002498384,0.09664936,0.00018608084,0.05657338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025808094,0.00028310792,0.4310764,0.00006215685,0.00008351747,0.000009907278,0.39995578,0.000051091396,0.00023388931,0.027841961,0.13693286,0.00088848796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019860813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000103994425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36058074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034182245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038226648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5366385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982423120","doi":"10.7202/1027114ar","title":"La responsabilité relative au permis de construction en droit québécois","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01006139143739615,"score_gpt":0.2631221719150196,"score_spread":0.2530607804776234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982423120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.637724,0.0014310782,0.0025819282,0.0071050166,0.0014175558,0.0003972397,0.000054726457,0.00018632611,0.34910217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93596363,0.00025703255,0.007309919,0.00020782111,0.0023645456,0.000048557093,0.000007859332,0.00006388575,0.053776763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938519,0.0032697397,0.000575319,0.0006971011,0.00044320646,0.0011627295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954598,0.0028436566,0.00031716164,0.0006618752,0.00016208108,0.00055540877],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040287413,0.00027445826,0.0005410562,0.00013632046,0.00055816566,0.00012707456,0.00067186524,0.0009266381,0.00070915464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004899555,0.0004463073,0.00033979077,0.0008789322,0.002384564,0.0006240409,0.00013246809,0.0009973603,0.0008829102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006959342,0.00009852819,0.021766245,0.00016190328,0.000069370224,0.000054082433,0.29161784,0.00008370228,0.000090291665,0.6305638,0.0002454343,0.055179223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057129125,0.00021612014,0.008127062,0.00044637194,0.00024925117,0.00020558391,0.015686959,0.0014845509,0.00016966839,0.30820724,0.6639352,0.0007006888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028113877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008332702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6636898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004606801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011636678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983570010","doi":"10.4314/ad.v34i3-4.63525","title":"1 - Wasted Citizenship? Reclaimers and the Privatised Expansion of the Public Sphere","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Africa Development","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Public sphere; Citizenship; Realm; Livelihood; Private sphere; Governmentality; Political economy; Public administration; Commons; Dismissal; Negotiation; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.02885563251180901,"score_gpt":0.2602801075770594,"score_spread":0.23142447506525038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983570010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51012176,0.0032103332,0.00025197215,0.056726616,0.0009736167,0.0019575052,0.000004145684,0.00019693091,0.42655712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99304193,0.000033282955,0.0035113972,0.00028000423,0.00003820178,0.000017741088,8.1619095e-7,0.000006724944,0.0030698993],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816656,0.0003683252,0.0002952844,0.00019643617,0.00064353674,0.000329853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999087,0.00024886668,0.00015871502,0.00028716892,0.0001235867,0.0000946683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010502534,0.000115354545,0.00017788893,0.000030892632,0.0007444005,0.00007837164,0.0005416547,0.00008204971,0.00012578095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008589399,0.0000638564,0.000047548197,0.0006485755,0.00061291916,0.00008209847,0.00012940631,0.00014606102,0.000015489595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009863904,0.00006787915,0.0037841215,0.000014841635,0.00009573276,0.0000040046743,0.77231437,0.0000019174784,0.000471383,0.12430363,0.015754549,0.083088905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017149786,0.000037266524,0.020739246,0.00008696114,0.00003123779,0.0000013401818,0.019569123,0.000016410268,0.001637533,0.01574391,0.9400861,0.00033588475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003529146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043256987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92433155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000102533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003498039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5725402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985833149","doi":"10.1163/221097312x13397499736787","title":"Enforcing Fundamental Rights in Nigerian Courts – Processes and Challenges","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Redress; Constitution; Law; Fundamental rights; Political science; Jurisdiction; Human rights; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05640802013070071,"score_gpt":0.3423379376105661,"score_spread":0.28592991747986535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985833149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6437514,0.21243368,0.0000093838335,0.03333128,0.00075743435,0.00028746386,0.0000037639202,0.000047529567,0.109378055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932351,0.0056958445,0.00031046045,0.000105454565,0.00044822154,0.0000019519825,6.73683e-8,0.0000047159947,0.00019819119],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984081,0.00014619292,0.00041971193,0.00015411722,0.00051188073,0.00036001403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989343,0.00025464344,0.00030613772,0.00007027131,0.00028613338,0.00014848128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090673374,0.00014562084,0.0004194971,0.00016698758,0.0004120228,0.00009867804,0.00023894105,0.00004973918,0.000011334406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061231706,0.00011273686,0.0000495428,0.00028263952,0.00044461948,0.0006764481,0.000041423704,0.00022055849,0.0000024106046],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014755613,0.00019848488,0.004003751,0.00008196793,0.00017112982,0.0005107812,0.9303673,0.000009664726,0.000039822862,0.05203533,0.0007346691,0.011699557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008488599,0.00086816447,0.0050034425,0.00036913474,0.00005372627,0.000041517218,0.20650485,9.57354e-7,0.0001042184,0.018758206,0.7671035,0.0003434078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028511687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020261575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76636887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019446948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015859328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4597276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987225883","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2008.00015.x","title":"Conceptualizing attorney general conduct in Charter litigation: From independence to central agency","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Political science; Charter; Law; Supreme court","score_opus":0.0915259864041464,"score_gpt":0.3303397594812043,"score_spread":0.23881377307705792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987225883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9488744,0.00011726138,0.00012847038,0.019423021,0.0009188609,0.00040094825,0.00012537312,0.000057733185,0.029953938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949469,0.0000066092603,0.0005964315,0.0014771587,0.00088640035,0.0000387265,0.00014356061,0.00001214476,0.001892059],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980205,0.00020438837,0.00029839872,0.00036463272,0.0004178081,0.0006942627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982915,0.0000469771,0.00006986663,0.0002179779,0.00015146815,0.0012222402],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028237808,0.00012765973,0.00014417728,0.00016566434,0.000505998,0.00019851375,0.00034268975,0.00020130129,0.0018725782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005432922,0.00015663983,0.000036205598,0.0005583375,0.00026514113,0.0008074985,0.000015150796,0.00020093103,0.00017986775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014204494,0.00005773405,0.21237493,0.0000051597563,0.000021887032,0.00059153547,0.31857303,0.0000056019167,0.00027409074,0.44793323,0.017657671,0.002490934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028265544,0.000058912614,0.063276045,0.000015697255,0.0000043367177,0.0000056614085,0.0042014485,0.000071390925,0.00018307376,0.0009374639,0.9305865,0.00037678157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10641576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7560052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9129289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008506661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00546385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991712514","doi":"10.1163/221097312x13397499735869","title":"Violence, Amnesty and Transitional Law: “private” Acts and “public” Truth in South Africa","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Amnesty; Impunity; Transitional justice; Political science; Law; Normative; Democracy; Politics; Human rights; International law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03779984685403315,"score_gpt":0.3056065072990975,"score_spread":0.26780666044506435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991712514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9492475,0.022489801,0.000085798085,0.006347729,0.00039802314,0.0001777454,0.000018075443,0.000032561038,0.021202784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971038,0.0011107471,0.0013009999,0.0001214797,0.00031216472,0.000004890144,2.4213426e-7,0.000012392348,0.000033292665],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790996,0.00021080047,0.00049848156,0.00022949289,0.0006598966,0.00049138203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987369,0.00031269068,0.0002820475,0.00009235084,0.00027851996,0.0002974751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010305049,0.00019187489,0.0004857692,0.00020771104,0.00050707656,0.00015804787,0.000254499,0.00008088065,0.000010336808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074188714,0.00015631187,0.00007945074,0.0005208474,0.0016501963,0.00077125005,0.000086156186,0.00038214726,0.0000031405762],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011616762,0.00015301474,0.008671884,0.000026622125,0.00016473189,0.00027854397,0.5101862,0.000029098048,0.000034863144,0.47909242,0.00003458804,0.0012118886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0063217734,0.0011552055,0.018721469,0.001199776,0.00024134462,0.00013264662,0.496364,0.0000037121376,0.00012910663,0.17663097,0.29793268,0.0011673154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023572604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046958312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30246148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020690182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021769824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6374213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999535358","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2010/v13i3a2691","title":"Rethinking Volks V Robinson: The Implications of Applying a \"Contextaulised Choice Model\" to Prospective South African Domestic Partnerships Legislation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Sine qua non; Law; Jurisprudence; General partnership; Duty; Legislation; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.059355931468528064,"score_gpt":0.3419609162935602,"score_spread":0.2826049848250321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999535358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44617176,0.014928414,0.08099538,0.116098024,0.0026891723,0.01692807,0.00023407217,0.0017890955,0.320166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927049,0.00020931974,0.0022332636,0.0003200459,0.0017232724,0.000687023,0.000009925305,0.0001631212,0.0019491116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909868,0.0010225661,0.0015539175,0.0012116154,0.0020243472,0.0032007108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913086,0.0009270582,0.0027113487,0.002746574,0.001364053,0.0009423224],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005464276,0.00085308036,0.0011708844,0.00031706094,0.010228443,0.0018060139,0.004560439,0.0005117753,0.0000814134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043519153,0.00071601436,0.0007040726,0.0009648801,0.0021307233,0.0019188407,0.00055838306,0.003231095,0.000058562026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063545577,0.0003565574,0.008545995,0.00005505281,0.0010100459,0.000022606802,0.23515706,0.008850877,0.0019293948,0.73381704,0.00075024983,0.008869695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008546193,0.0020273519,0.006364441,0.00088734477,0.0021039546,0.00020124027,0.045264285,0.006215171,0.0025916642,0.5058038,0.41575322,0.0042413003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028565766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021319136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54653317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033186872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025760466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001470746","doi":"10.3917/polaf.091.0083","title":"«Maman bat papa»","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Politique africaine","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029664676324288472,"score_gpt":0.31665467822553506,"score_spread":0.28699000190124657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001470746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062510273,0.023164924,0.0003913156,0.0471465,0.0034790782,0.00038806797,0.000072511284,0.00021715983,0.9188894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7764091,0.0007306351,0.0015066303,0.0013619304,0.0013600542,0.00003659882,0.0000049835317,0.000056093864,0.21853401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949281,0.0015294722,0.00054862385,0.0006072389,0.00067085185,0.0017157164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974753,0.000615252,0.00020021679,0.0006627969,0.00023035092,0.0008160818],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014049463,0.0004027924,0.00047781388,0.0001222986,0.00055084104,0.0001486664,0.000603046,0.00046974284,0.007912366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022294899,0.00043768217,0.00025429126,0.0012360937,0.0013893532,0.00047711306,0.00010083635,0.00056717655,0.0036876327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000353401,0.0001823763,0.001283214,0.000041105213,0.000042721396,0.00006692552,0.0639669,0.0000046158543,0.000021182628,0.91370124,0.01958959,0.001096596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002888909,0.00008667032,0.00019023035,0.0000552209,0.00006167003,0.000009695094,0.0027675058,0.000010976161,0.00026374296,0.13284606,0.8629795,0.00043988734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005421815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044189818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84338987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006221538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040195388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002031328","doi":"10.7202/1021211ar","title":"Environmental Justice and Human Rights on the Mining Wastelands of the Witwatersrand Gold Fields","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Settlement (finance); Transformative learning; Politics; Environmental justice; Statutory law; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Order (exchange); Social rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy; Economics","score_opus":0.011698180579348079,"score_gpt":0.2370247737388817,"score_spread":0.22532659315953363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002031328","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88216335,0.000030714724,0.000014124421,0.0009024328,0.00013945391,0.00011993221,0.0000040069563,0.000011354787,0.116614625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957177,0.0000045267357,0.00005610256,0.00014624165,0.00036423389,0.000005760301,7.1383516e-7,0.000006340574,0.0036983944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919575,0.00016715203,0.0001229511,0.00013585911,0.00018117596,0.00019712043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993515,0.00026927306,0.00007660711,0.00024349797,0.0000057181983,0.00005341023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004448094,0.000059415383,0.000108477696,0.000015605323,0.00047421127,0.00003543141,0.00030996505,0.000081456215,0.00005806214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007006237,0.000045541266,0.000046811223,0.00006499025,0.0003421292,0.00004842956,0.00006176008,0.0001366339,0.000011016279],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006538478,0.00017969568,0.062262207,0.00016794866,0.00008778297,0.000015018529,0.4435777,0.00014491187,0.0021356598,0.48516193,0.0040039974,0.0021977634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039556976,0.0013160344,0.09521958,0.0013397582,0.001429168,0.00004031938,0.040935725,0.0018601759,0.015367557,0.2535573,0.58298767,0.0019910117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003010992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002853465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57898366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004426346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000059918466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36472976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W200252722","doi":"","title":"Criminal justice and political cultures : national and international dimensions of crime control","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Willan eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Crime control; Policy transfer; Criminal justice; Criminology; Politics; Cultural criminology; Embeddedness; Sociology; Organised crime; Imprisonment; Opposition (politics); Political science; Law; Social science; Public administration","score_opus":0.02616812384129907,"score_gpt":0.3362722245047189,"score_spread":0.3101041006634198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W200252722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002060886,0.0007074988,0.000025143867,0.00046651787,0.0004128617,0.00020956405,0.00023437451,0.00003911387,0.99769884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58726215,0.000018652096,0.00035725755,0.00050569605,0.0009754003,0.0000067972023,0.000015609285,0.000017331939,0.4108411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845374,0.0000695018,0.00025783776,0.00027845489,0.00066468114,0.00027578915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888366,0.00030652486,0.0001330767,0.00009208033,0.00035903908,0.00022559238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023486454,0.00017655632,0.00027163207,0.00010238045,0.00024395177,0.00006686756,0.0002025226,0.00028776677,0.000091451926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046976676,0.00014760756,0.00006099016,0.000013295365,0.0013806426,0.00004095455,0.000091903625,0.0002605217,0.000011139788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021268463,0.000010528242,0.000020878155,0.0000663321,0.000064606866,0.000009087943,0.021315694,7.9776294e-7,0.00001591351,0.9752513,0.003073467,0.00015009398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007486867,0.00006122293,0.00020460968,0.00017649333,0.000555317,0.000014309783,0.0021110289,0.0000091379925,0.0000086943055,0.13687779,0.85893106,0.00030164974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020962328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007320489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8558576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035415852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012821772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60192615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005609060","doi":"10.1080/03057070.2013.814299","title":"The History of Dispossession at Orania and the Politics of Land Restitution in South Africa","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Southern African Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Trillium Foundation; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Politics; Political science; Land reform; Political economy; Geography; Sociology; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03186419755194626,"score_gpt":0.28956580843322477,"score_spread":0.2577016108812785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005609060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9171738,0.06802088,0.0000123754135,0.0020330832,0.0005679752,0.00029217667,0.000016222286,0.0000075767202,0.011875912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949358,0.0006023611,0.00010133603,0.000013971981,0.00014299844,0.0000050572053,5.752157e-8,0.0000072846165,0.0041911136],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811745,0.00044196576,0.0005753706,0.000085941916,0.0005491689,0.00023009113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975955,0.00087330886,0.0008511358,0.00015282565,0.00046213233,0.00006512371],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017030364,0.000102026555,0.00039029573,0.00007988092,0.00033590506,0.000018881103,0.0003075143,0.000051221963,0.000015438854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015742717,0.000048735117,0.00009275041,0.00020546213,0.0035459595,0.00010300246,0.00013597163,0.00018576263,0.0000063997404],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014780418,0.000030903626,0.031059658,0.000022128243,0.000089329245,0.000002786528,0.96322703,0.0000083570885,0.00006387704,0.0040004854,0.001104144,0.00024347928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019710092,0.00016498008,0.008638248,0.00027098018,0.0001665189,0.0000029859991,0.85353065,0.00002516181,0.00001801335,0.010663108,0.124371484,0.0001768488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087200216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036880682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12326734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039530828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019196558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99916583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005853945","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2007.tb02136.x","title":"Ethics and good urban governance in Toronto: The Bellamy report and integrity in public service","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Public service; Political science; Corporate governance; Government (linguistics); Politics; Economic Justice; Public administration; Ethical code; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Management; Philosophy","score_opus":0.046468823105330855,"score_gpt":0.34395580008495186,"score_spread":0.297486976979621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005853945","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37724057,0.0018769914,0.00003476201,0.30893925,0.00043216234,0.0006033714,0.000029710522,0.000040766645,0.31080243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974969,0.00006114104,0.00012354099,0.0012915109,0.00016577374,0.000012249377,0.00001523403,0.000007716707,0.0008259068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831194,0.0002554275,0.0003160309,0.00028902272,0.00033468133,0.00049287576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986744,0.000326962,0.00012357764,0.0002227908,0.0001646023,0.00048765272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051648365,0.00010300264,0.00011424703,0.00005413839,0.00046910497,0.00038254145,0.00025019835,0.00031424678,0.00013799057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032305536,0.00009789945,0.000012231315,0.0005567721,0.0002738511,0.000800514,0.000029853216,0.0006977762,0.000003433045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042260467,0.000018246003,0.21129729,0.00001031562,0.0000035419685,0.0001537948,0.03517587,1.5526577e-8,0.0000015056689,0.75026715,0.0005182611,0.002549796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014678593,0.000023943938,0.16483755,0.000013815401,0.0000026515374,0.000019054796,0.017088477,0.000023654311,0.0000032419473,0.0011589284,0.81653273,0.0001491584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49350002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81601447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013442971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7005534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006029855","doi":"10.15173/glj.v4i2.1138","title":"Marikana Massacre and Strike Violence Post-Apartheid","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Labour Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); State (computer science); Political economy; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Law; Geography; Economics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.006321270030581632,"score_gpt":0.26750298906715736,"score_spread":0.2611817190365757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006029855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.911037,0.0039572995,0.00010745007,0.007001295,0.0011493103,0.00023590276,0.000082301754,0.00008419954,0.076345205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947073,0.0005710675,0.0017747799,0.0007975348,0.00068690453,0.0000037009002,9.011523e-7,0.0000075067555,0.0014503379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981483,0.00024763148,0.00024589294,0.0001936619,0.0005789966,0.0005854992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870515,0.000054488777,0.00014275277,0.00014774961,0.0004107138,0.000539136],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005917901,0.00013806034,0.00017157261,0.00003247704,0.0007858494,0.0006578144,0.00044630133,0.0001320563,0.0029315813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046270655,0.000118452124,0.00006305688,0.00030772566,0.0003307344,0.0006077192,0.000107520944,0.00033026305,0.00066329807],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090256726,0.00018316242,0.27462286,0.00003157399,0.00017168779,0.00031552993,0.028887833,0.000018688514,0.00025680457,0.37286437,0.025862928,0.2966943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072690926,0.00016123448,0.1186756,0.00011899373,0.00003625388,0.00014922771,0.011083253,0.000019166306,0.000019260151,0.098221555,0.7703134,0.00047519285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039401315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037029453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74445045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018497554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023694067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006585367","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v3n1p100","title":"Consideration of Obscene Speech in Prejudication in US Constitution","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitution; Law; Stipulation; Norm (philosophy); Constitutionalism; Judicial review; Political science; Value (mathematics); Promulgation; Sociology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.017782963657851984,"score_gpt":0.32359257935176267,"score_spread":0.3058096156939107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006585367","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9531964,0.00011090545,0.000023062024,0.00093186495,0.00024883376,0.000053298354,0.000002038626,0.0000014421811,0.04543212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986464,0.000032088985,0.0010841783,0.00008015347,0.00012137916,2.6932054e-7,2.7844905e-7,0.000001228895,0.000034018318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993891,0.000057722827,0.0002664928,0.000036629535,0.0001565856,0.00009347979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995351,0.00008524791,0.00015969815,0.000039329312,0.00012812289,0.00005250946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060653576,0.000028455597,0.00009772153,0.00006859182,0.000047435682,0.000024296203,0.000047181784,0.00006537462,0.000021789474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004120471,0.000026609416,0.00001468531,0.00007725203,0.000383733,0.00015865908,0.0000074171176,0.00016213699,6.4257307e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035118128,0.00003524568,0.032989476,0.0000050122094,0.0000017900172,0.0000065828085,0.0071932706,0.000005522988,0.0011342558,0.9584585,0.000019666413,0.00014716169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036354738,0.0003542191,0.18117785,0.00038360464,0.00006921092,0.00008325173,0.006987368,0.0004067136,0.02346167,0.4538959,0.3291231,0.0004216064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003824324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072976635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5045626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038191276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018012497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57812595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008300074","doi":"10.1177/095624780201400205","title":"Developing citizenship among urban youth in conflict with the law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Urbanization","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Centre for Comparative Criminology","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Criminology; Political science; Inclusion (mineral); Local government; Punishment (psychology); Government (linguistics); Inclusion–exclusion principle; Key (lock); Public administration; Public relations; Economic growth; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Gender studies; Politics","score_opus":0.033232065990055425,"score_gpt":0.22263105020884905,"score_spread":0.18939898421879361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008300074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91591704,0.001092165,0.00139767,0.0023502102,0.00006497942,0.0004305915,0.0000027307324,0.000058590475,0.078686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99693173,0.00010437637,0.0001354609,0.00021986087,0.00008325662,0.000007107556,0.0000045680845,0.000009205098,0.0025044563],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993076,0.000096204145,0.00008606156,0.00013986658,0.00020981823,0.00016047174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997847,0.000041535255,0.00004425283,0.000086006265,0.000005660951,0.000037850088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016418661,0.00006960337,0.000063998305,0.000019506091,0.00031333332,0.000068612186,0.000089863875,0.000049554128,0.00015627603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019035044,0.000050605024,0.00000735181,0.0001407155,0.00036545197,0.000111117915,0.000024582923,0.00007502862,0.000026721109],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038210846,0.000013689177,0.43211725,0.000003502791,0.000008858816,0.0000038160374,0.483951,0.0000659824,0.000004051137,0.08304438,0.000597439,0.0001862027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022113975,0.00017547111,0.29872987,0.00013313952,0.00014977457,0.0000010405671,0.1377229,0.0008786319,0.0002270551,0.001601788,0.5569021,0.0012668584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025102362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031286848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55630463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008948341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004385529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24099381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009151479","doi":"10.7202/1013030ar","title":"African Customary Marriages in South Africa and the Intricacies of a Mixed Legal System: Judicial (In)novatio or Confusio?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legal pluralism; Legislature; Constitutionalism; Comparative law; Legal history; Indigenous; Legal profession; Family law; Civil law (Civil law); Marriage law; Common law; Legal realism; Public law; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.028546077294312085,"score_gpt":0.27755494852196305,"score_spread":0.24900887122765097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009151479","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12277917,0.0033081672,0.000025682722,0.0016005244,0.0016537193,0.0007588598,0.00006868038,0.00006297526,0.8697422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988347,0.000030043922,0.00027071376,0.00006355188,0.00055666926,0.00001760304,3.4571528e-7,0.000015792966,0.00021053484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969894,0.00086591137,0.0007109836,0.00016494081,0.000622094,0.0006466611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985399,0.00053479645,0.00042213654,0.00017044117,0.00013559876,0.00019708577],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004050003,0.00016867633,0.00049885706,0.00022107556,0.001346483,0.00010702915,0.0004433573,0.00013580968,0.0001067645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095553213,0.00010670486,0.00008303595,0.00092594256,0.0012030627,0.00048616572,0.00015059943,0.00051047973,0.00001258302],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000445737,0.00008994402,0.004821182,0.000033263263,0.000036443253,0.00006492323,0.16106555,0.000005061498,0.000014889162,0.8325909,0.00019702403,0.00063511386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004292187,0.00011620579,0.0049167406,0.00023419352,0.00008230922,0.000059328624,0.12564915,0.00003378503,0.0000881824,0.0014141119,0.86271405,0.00039977604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047562025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007032184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8760556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002424272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057936853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009552916","doi":"10.4314/ad.v32i3.57190","title":"2 - Developmental Local Government in Post-Apartheid South Africa? A Feminist Rethinking of the State and Development in the Context of Neo-liberalism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Africa Development","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Sociology; State (computer science); Political economy; Government (linguistics); Neoliberalism (international relations); Population; Developmental state; Democracy; Inequality; Political science; Economic growth; Development economics; Gender studies; Politics; Economics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.026413598503755503,"score_gpt":0.2567912888004229,"score_spread":0.2303776902966674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009552916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9637634,0.0006461515,0.00020697116,0.000520442,0.00020736779,0.0009848932,0.000016734803,0.000020411047,0.033633612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907051,0.000008996982,0.008055485,0.0003137555,0.000016981297,0.00005337429,0.0000019876052,0.000020119436,0.0008242447],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.995351,0.00035898454,0.0012281307,0.00041940916,0.0018390983,0.00080335955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984976,0.00056117063,0.00044040935,0.00023543567,0.0001351318,0.00013023776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004958788,0.0002923062,0.00041481125,0.00012469033,0.00040023666,0.000057479043,0.0009262022,0.00014761221,0.000047799243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038610073,0.00020258832,0.0000555117,0.00091602636,0.00082548073,0.0001246444,0.00045532724,0.00038340682,0.000014940722],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008868413,0.00015030854,0.021083811,0.00002512974,0.000037225203,0.000022337454,0.961155,0.000004699797,0.00011120002,0.0013914371,0.00007540442,0.015854778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013653587,0.000059658767,0.107060954,0.00030828553,0.000014522311,0.0000053618787,0.45797807,0.0000055697615,0.007578379,0.00063866883,0.42440188,0.00058330176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044803182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006655049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5031769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010317422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001267128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82613117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010061757","doi":"10.7202/042232ar","title":"L'immixtion et la trop grande expertise du propriétaire, cause d'exonération de responsabilité des architectes et des entrepreneurs sous l'article 1688 C.C.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Supreme court; Liability; Law; Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.013526741643153352,"score_gpt":0.2964197419582084,"score_spread":0.28289300031505504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010061757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9767699,0.00037342758,0.012786265,0.001407175,0.000061539606,0.0003634032,0.000008437229,0.00036972298,0.007860106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98839164,0.00022124108,0.009067221,0.0003544574,0.00019976858,0.00011423497,0.0000060229418,0.000039482653,0.0016059083],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652183,0.0016851111,0.00031127105,0.00038994782,0.00042208258,0.0006697452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983647,0.00081405556,0.00010695069,0.00030454414,0.00011896594,0.0002908085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018774077,0.00019661183,0.00020449473,0.00012101053,0.0007347074,0.00026969897,0.00031336353,0.0002729855,0.00007294082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004102437,0.00020469363,0.00012965851,0.0003998824,0.0018154044,0.0005472573,0.000045559074,0.0004070066,0.000045320216],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004895088,0.00032900163,0.06899855,0.00003357268,0.00005026042,0.000060786366,0.7436123,0.0019810924,0.009327156,0.048579145,0.00010251783,0.12643613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00788969,0.0012735366,0.22829676,0.00045064153,0.00053457916,0.00021974706,0.07792512,0.007793434,0.10160306,0.4475335,0.12329351,0.0031864287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013177155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049022464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66568714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012822663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023830454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8347164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012229299","doi":"10.7202/1013029ar","title":"South Africa: A Diceyan Rechtsstaat?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutionalism; Law; Political science; Doctrine; Constitutional law; Liberal democracy; Rule of law; State (computer science); Democracy; Interpreter; Politics; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.060937889761241405,"score_gpt":0.3179023034452359,"score_spread":0.2569644136839945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012229299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002374822,0.0012247697,0.00007941556,0.0006659234,0.001792479,0.00010329664,0.000019532477,0.00011285115,0.9936269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992992,0.000025440977,0.0019939884,0.00018622335,0.002183323,0.0000046372415,4.8883186e-7,0.00002318669,0.0025907308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750626,0.00038315973,0.0002861157,0.00013925372,0.0007524202,0.0009328009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998657,0.00011064886,0.00018395387,0.00019428587,0.00013481794,0.00071927754],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019651025,0.00013718267,0.00018735696,0.00006322701,0.00560981,0.00015436135,0.00045939052,0.00014364121,0.0011507948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036671452,0.00011689638,0.00013745122,0.00031928136,0.00034122218,0.00079172774,0.00008129762,0.0005287769,0.00076648814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022001448,0.00012120436,0.0021747379,0.0000041263706,0.00004948534,0.000034309178,0.19729826,0.0000021637068,0.000021756905,0.7952754,0.001988072,0.0030084967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018929661,0.000025771029,0.000090823174,0.0000142947965,0.000028973362,0.00001466197,0.007189402,8.934511e-7,0.000066287,0.0016835943,0.9905252,0.00017082675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060200767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000844481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9910362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025592596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001964421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013627542","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2000.tb01565.x","title":"The South AfricdCanada Program on Governance: an experiment in supporting democracy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada; Government of Ontario","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Corporate governance; Public service; Good governance; Work (physics); Democratic governance; Service (business); Politics; Management; Law; Engineering; Economy; Economics","score_opus":0.02486518913146441,"score_gpt":0.336732285012598,"score_spread":0.3118670958811336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013627542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60963845,0.00014750578,0.00000234676,0.06429417,0.00042902472,0.0011227985,0.00004336329,0.00013453052,0.32418784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99465865,0.0000071450127,0.0001504367,0.00037948508,0.00022528695,0.00012521037,0.00002801664,0.000014110646,0.004411647],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979402,0.00019763732,0.00029861412,0.00029049048,0.00047235895,0.0008006968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870163,0.00006282557,0.000106575644,0.00029989248,0.00006337386,0.00076572335],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007700827,0.000121246274,0.000096411815,0.000053166987,0.0013137226,0.0006683416,0.00043986226,0.00011112078,0.0011933771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039935226,0.00011085722,0.00003157778,0.00048737566,0.00021142082,0.0004823983,0.0000057651005,0.00019410525,0.0000718631],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038608545,0.00021475214,0.0072752293,0.000004341892,0.000013468224,0.0001444701,0.0635141,0.0000062706067,0.0000031726745,0.38608536,0.0052687493,0.5374315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013107155,0.00016146214,0.0023236002,0.0000062710756,0.0000021794235,9.923313e-7,0.0074341455,0.00011167925,0.000029142398,0.00054516084,0.9890837,0.00017056723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0655813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9167075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98381495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010598885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048125247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014559428","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2013/v16i1a2310","title":"Reasonable and Probable Cause in the Law of Malicious Prosecution: A Review of South African and Commonwealth Decisions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Law; Conviction; Action (physics); Cause of action; Discretion; Political science; Reasonable doubt; Commonwealth","score_opus":0.0806131554190942,"score_gpt":0.39180385668970136,"score_spread":0.31119070127060716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014559428","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000119134595,0.97844636,0.000024344701,0.0014249411,0.0001831206,0.0036594567,0.000117027776,0.000058346453,0.015967289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040353518,0.9575854,0.00042121968,0.00016689043,0.00047580662,0.00034630325,0.00003564269,0.00014944364,0.00046580145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869538,0.0038363428,0.0031856138,0.001157361,0.0021655825,0.0027012816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895905,0.0016657464,0.0051620025,0.002232065,0.00069285306,0.0006568165],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011661233,0.0012174381,0.005016841,0.00039482213,0.002316387,0.0005326696,0.0031699,0.00086608814,0.00004960039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023421687,0.0008822389,0.0009406673,0.001274207,0.0037171084,0.0008528804,0.0005752609,0.0041646794,0.000008969421],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021588763,0.00079120096,0.00013864163,0.047650795,0.0018184659,0.00024764676,0.042045966,0.0000035504038,0.0000017645767,0.6883862,0.0012691632,0.2174307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008149917,0.00058293564,0.000003729116,0.049831577,0.0018846699,0.0005072837,0.0031217707,0.000001801374,0.0000023728155,0.005832254,0.93670493,0.00071166235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005787913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018023394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9354358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015500536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045452965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014918168","doi":"10.1177/002070200906400211","title":"Contact Africa","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Peacekeeping; International court; Political science; Security council; Independence (probability theory); General assembly; Law; League; Foreign policy; Collective security; Public administration; Politics; International law; Public international law","score_opus":0.012180476186127465,"score_gpt":0.345523314866636,"score_spread":0.33334283868050857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014918168","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.097430125,0.007776714,0.0042626313,0.6348882,0.0061414964,0.00015411274,0.00026889853,0.000043454012,0.24903439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914172,0.00019416734,0.0004527036,0.003534492,0.0039268266,1.7658006e-7,0.0000013437299,0.0000049655728,0.00046809853],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950249,0.00032286777,0.0009414117,0.00013416212,0.0030839632,0.0004926772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955673,0.00012380147,0.0011620492,0.00013929281,0.0022621304,0.0007454187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011776661,0.00017486847,0.00046635655,0.000518693,0.0003543449,0.00045901892,0.0016999557,0.00009285385,0.00056986394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019115926,0.00015427479,0.0006341815,0.001955446,0.00009626953,0.0005946011,0.00003744496,0.00046273487,0.0000059807926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000996125,0.00056860177,0.04091915,0.000003379982,0.019096974,0.009665024,0.018485952,0.0088534495,0.00011217438,0.16784145,0.69630235,0.03715538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052985083,0.00011671328,0.015022056,0.000023270773,0.000667805,0.00024336265,0.0012040002,0.000041445626,0.000008229152,0.012786055,0.96914905,0.00020815006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5062377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6317649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8939871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005030731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006399712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017397267","doi":"10.1163/187197310x527784","title":"Antony Anghie, Bhupinder Chimni, Karin Mickelson and Obiora Okafor (eds.), The Third World and International Order: Law Politics and Globalization, Developments in International Law, 45, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2003, 208 pp., ISBN-13: 978-90-41-12166-0.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; International law; Political science; Globalization; Politics; Public international law; Order (exchange); Economics","score_opus":0.028425644070195474,"score_gpt":0.3348973936284089,"score_spread":0.30647174955821344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017397267","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08334405,0.04638246,0.00011156469,0.06708875,0.0069498806,0.0026267767,0.00067078776,0.000278129,0.7925476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95351475,0.014307059,0.0028473241,0.02022302,0.0005340755,0.00010624035,0.0003577191,0.00005108788,0.008058739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99660367,0.0007577836,0.000862212,0.0004099986,0.0009106365,0.00045571322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973915,0.00051257556,0.00038564467,0.00047330928,0.0010072445,0.00022971001],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023356474,0.0003624553,0.0004324152,0.00013312015,0.0011119394,0.0006687519,0.00171046,0.00019226826,0.00041082568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012300811,0.0003220219,0.000067371,0.0005937108,0.0016515545,0.00096573425,0.0011080839,0.0011634417,0.000036011657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002702862,0.00026316306,0.033183552,0.0001496268,0.00018890179,0.00001310421,0.007840992,0.000001859154,0.000020229912,0.94143337,0.012945529,0.003932665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006437949,0.000017221315,0.007114397,0.00064777414,0.000038834616,0.00003378917,0.0003346318,0.00006869803,0.000018191251,0.010890971,0.97984016,0.00035155582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0341335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12024188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9668946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024654303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019331687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017780382","doi":"10.2495/sdp-v9-n1-74-89","title":"The review of sub-sahara africa gravel roads maintenance management system’s monitoring and need assessment: tanzania experience","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tanzania; Agency (philosophy); Business; Government (linguistics); Environmental planning; Monitoring and evaluation; Pavement management; Environmental resource management; Management system; Transport engineering; Engineering; Operations management; Geography; Economic growth; Environmental science; Economics","score_opus":0.01572388572961067,"score_gpt":0.30578987237292604,"score_spread":0.2900659866433154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017780382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7384369,0.08238492,0.012871303,0.0034310806,0.0042059487,0.0010785555,0.0000031915747,0.000065519605,0.15752263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907266,0.0040059886,0.0037048052,0.000030160814,0.00019039826,0.000012155342,5.5139935e-7,0.0000062708527,0.0013231083],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982001,0.000114794115,0.0005110463,0.000116205534,0.0007860688,0.00027177765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983553,0.00021182075,0.00048152255,0.000067041445,0.00079132017,0.000092983915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023780135,0.000102713326,0.00019503139,0.00012496082,0.00042698547,0.0001867525,0.00044175034,0.00003315268,0.0000034463349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032346754,0.000076087505,0.000032138625,0.00016905776,0.00013291852,0.00031557182,0.00014749961,0.00013958265,5.1491446e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002514267,0.000087172615,0.07784963,0.0038736535,0.000799224,0.0017418814,0.45935482,0.00007365519,0.000112545444,0.38720018,0.004225424,0.064430386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050516904,0.00003571296,0.018103942,0.0076811095,0.00003342697,0.000026147804,0.29545715,0.00005169278,0.00015941201,0.0005371201,0.677213,0.00019607379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031375763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.7489734e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6729876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002673092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013584639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32840702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017848436","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12342005","title":"Governance, Peace and Human Rights Violations in Africa: Addressing the Application of the Right to Self-Determination in Post-Independence Africa","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Human rights; Autonomy; Commission; Political science; Law; Corporate governance; Charter; Self-determination; Context (archaeology); International law; Judicial independence; Politics; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.037559979490837996,"score_gpt":0.34044152133600647,"score_spread":0.30288154184516847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017848436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9409574,0.009846137,0.00016204373,0.005923506,0.00047197563,0.0007851624,0.000012208009,0.000020636713,0.04182089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988719,0.000047248155,0.00055581273,0.000022505417,0.00021666028,0.00002195266,9.0902155e-8,0.0000074978466,0.00025632055],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976987,0.0004695742,0.00055801775,0.00014401195,0.00076016894,0.0003694932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817014,0.0005088185,0.00064963393,0.00018776116,0.0003970538,0.00008660378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020680942,0.00013378599,0.0003029452,0.0001290453,0.00073972146,0.00006852881,0.00053405366,0.00006300249,0.0000048021834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005846098,0.00007931279,0.000069876754,0.0010338592,0.00040525544,0.0009027799,0.00016323225,0.000370944,0.0000018610372],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048440925,0.00033053203,0.06890933,0.000027609756,0.000080523016,0.000009776692,0.8369786,0.00004331047,0.00090308994,0.090365306,0.00059796544,0.0017055047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009546702,0.0002866171,0.47439927,0.0005070722,0.00019154865,0.000019170728,0.066563755,0.000048707603,0.0007306061,0.005763098,0.45003384,0.00050164625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010629876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005787666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7704148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036874306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000086586144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5689414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019776754","doi":"10.1007/s00267-007-9034-x","title":"Land Claims and Comanagement of Protected Areas in South Africa: Exploring the Challenges","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Management","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nature Conservation; Geography; Forest management; Environmental planning; Agroforestry; Forestry; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.041703815487841446,"score_gpt":0.24636983803244258,"score_spread":0.20466602254460114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019776754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8899468,0.0029563943,0.00016366782,0.00065385294,0.00017179007,0.0015098152,0.0000042211295,0.000049656846,0.10454375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99800164,0.0006497214,0.00043341407,0.000023626466,0.00004818094,0.000102814214,9.903971e-7,0.000011642395,0.00072795385],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985938,0.000105964624,0.00023184564,0.00025270417,0.00046923183,0.00034643334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954814,0.00005994133,0.00008351318,0.00024123541,0.0000021246321,0.000065075896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010961619,0.00011912833,0.00013125199,0.000103812206,0.00017533182,0.000023661763,0.0002669335,0.000032547472,0.000049224152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009990423,0.00009675508,0.000029860223,0.00015437193,0.00034400506,0.00012135507,0.00032775613,0.00011243254,0.000023095874],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011721689,0.0004883438,0.07948896,0.00015680217,0.00016993555,0.00012843676,0.78001845,0.00007626553,0.0000850019,0.060690034,0.00005434037,0.07852624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089652423,0.00009332247,0.64368755,0.00007950125,0.000050986695,2.4821898e-7,0.1937014,0.000013615326,0.00015280582,0.0020101913,0.1590164,0.00029748798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000076516524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015789797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.586317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014955607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002117988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39455578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032899432","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2010.0015","title":"The Legacy of Empire: The Common Law Inheritance and Commitments to Legality in Former British Colonies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Colonialism; Indigenous; Political science; Law; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Population; Rule of law; Jurisprudence; Corporate governance; Sociology; Politics; Demography; Economics","score_opus":0.03161779720101658,"score_gpt":0.3712986535816661,"score_spread":0.3396808563806495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032899432","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9654953,0.0006328699,0.000010105668,0.008911783,0.00022646546,0.0002743488,0.0000074553113,0.0000051744905,0.024436532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998336,0.000049684466,0.00022738744,0.0011409321,0.000119029486,0.000009143241,1.2097516e-7,0.000006208343,0.00011150119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977568,0.0009455294,0.00045277312,0.000095083145,0.00047531747,0.00027453044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975948,0.0012066913,0.0006071015,0.0002578692,0.0002334116,0.000100177196],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019783871,0.000106706844,0.00043069673,0.000016058353,0.0009018698,0.00029960592,0.00096025807,0.000022645241,0.000011591934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005229583,0.000060146467,0.000070209164,0.00042378934,0.007014606,0.00038534988,0.00011320823,0.00057394564,0.0000033387523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005091258,0.00017722008,0.027753545,0.000004374132,0.00013753155,0.000013098682,0.33981895,0.000031597745,0.00040158202,0.62366784,0.002523515,0.0049615963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069110206,0.0008614875,0.09122518,0.00009840055,0.000048938673,0.00003242944,0.08476939,0.000014089675,0.00083843747,0.054623257,0.7665428,0.00025451786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0129748415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1543249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76401925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047426376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000083286104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037310542","doi":"10.1163/170873812x626090","title":"Provisional Registration of a Retirement Fund under Scrutiny in Swaziland","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Certificate; Complaint; Pension; Pension fund; Business; Law; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.12819428883288406,"score_gpt":0.41543919384198386,"score_spread":0.2872449050090998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037310542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83678687,0.024724511,0.00011266852,0.008548274,0.001287161,0.0003372116,0.000006784014,0.000015917725,0.12818061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974032,0.00021536199,0.00083379814,0.00005280586,0.0005326072,0.0000031596217,2.099166e-7,0.000006776632,0.00095207297],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977517,0.00026009415,0.0006546158,0.00009385757,0.00089683203,0.0003429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984684,0.00027226662,0.0006437672,0.000097126824,0.00038895712,0.00012945407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002399467,0.0001067085,0.00034598523,0.00013789843,0.00017200073,0.000030308607,0.00022973919,0.000048835976,0.000037377304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087964785,0.00008291754,0.00009332207,0.0004068734,0.00052226475,0.00055337854,0.000060776558,0.00021057697,0.0000041150147],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050173997,0.0008909527,0.23033875,0.00009668092,0.00051238056,0.000056656354,0.57763684,0.000104350045,0.00063548516,0.17402402,0.011561445,0.0036407234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019104057,0.0010313671,0.08241493,0.000535375,0.00018539935,0.000017432658,0.31115878,0.000005414762,0.00059252226,0.005821296,0.59581757,0.00050951244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004412746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053821376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5842561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028224522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021952963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3381279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037575371","doi":"10.1080/02582470709464752","title":"Mobilising ‘Community’ for Justice in District Six: Stakeholder Politics Early in the Land Restitution Process","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Historical Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Politics; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Dilemma; Political science; Economic Justice; Inclusion (mineral); Stakeholder; Public administration; State (computer science); Land administration; Law; Sociology; Geography; Social science","score_opus":0.0911174463509951,"score_gpt":0.34796807263169366,"score_spread":0.25685062628069855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037575371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9575802,0.0008326666,0.0046192454,0.0016113849,0.0017187975,0.0007025232,0.000024482799,0.00006067261,0.03285002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973263,0.0000075428497,0.0006167766,0.00014059519,0.0013133087,0.000016845406,0.0000016204583,0.000017726523,0.000559276],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963574,0.0008509764,0.00064290385,0.00019835656,0.00097483676,0.00097554014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973698,0.0014961531,0.00031020385,0.00025655815,0.00027242134,0.0002948111],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007240666,0.00017265195,0.00027593598,0.00031985756,0.0015146566,0.00021723546,0.0008713124,0.0001962886,0.000010818867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005544714,0.00013637444,0.00010246623,0.0014345013,0.00023552142,0.00031063668,0.000037206217,0.0016612414,0.000006667738],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001732074,0.0003943199,0.14731973,0.000054669446,0.000011857962,0.00012476294,0.8435669,0.0002102023,0.000005403498,0.006565441,0.00093494484,0.0006385769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031513385,0.00065640884,0.06763562,0.00020505753,0.0002646927,0.000037280082,0.36305562,0.000063417894,0.000010235889,0.014445433,0.5494951,0.0009797815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035970376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018316215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5485602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052910014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004468078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037632484","doi":"10.1353/anq.2003.0045","title":"In the Eye of the Storm: The State and Non-Violence in Southern Africa (Botswana)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropological Quarterly","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Silence; Politics; State (computer science); Ethnic group; Citizenship; Institution; Law; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Political science; Gender studies; Media studies","score_opus":0.019528073002409187,"score_gpt":0.3130048656446204,"score_spread":0.2934767926422112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037632484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9705193,0.0008343825,0.00003437409,0.006781297,0.00022167135,0.0004297721,0.000009973719,0.000010018521,0.021159206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988707,0.00008385608,0.00004531008,0.0003042156,0.00003677679,0.000022348739,9.8213384e-8,0.0000050315252,0.0006317025],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737924,0.0012945953,0.0002715814,0.00022998873,0.00040878734,0.00041582325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989925,0.00047471948,0.00011260871,0.00034296463,0.00003494097,0.00004226821],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015819788,0.00012313153,0.00018898562,0.000029096098,0.0004102779,0.00005738554,0.00075318624,0.000102122714,0.00028271577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028162473,0.000053080763,0.000060104634,0.00060792716,0.0037721992,0.00010838987,0.000031001342,0.00035800994,0.000050399525],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019227653,0.00017184379,0.05077996,0.0000056136473,0.0000068183867,0.000020814306,0.9239746,0.0000057886023,0.000041765743,0.021800281,0.00039155388,0.0027817462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069525494,0.00080408005,0.051014084,0.00007851174,0.00002147851,0.0000023429716,0.78741306,0.00005210185,0.000048557176,0.094045274,0.06546106,0.00036420606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0110420445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008623439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13656154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038459526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000068581765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038134501","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100010061","title":"Administrative Discretion and the Spirit of Legality: From Theory to Practice","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Principle of legality; Discretion; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.02094910563217443,"score_gpt":0.3122005883661069,"score_spread":0.2912514827339325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038134501","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2749155,0.06839086,0.002696192,0.51029795,0.0045420807,0.0011681473,0.0012091915,0.000014577005,0.13676548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97738576,0.00081878435,0.0022137673,0.013879986,0.00075932307,0.0000028991255,0.0000046540918,0.000018235583,0.004916617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971095,0.0010238589,0.0006856038,0.00029125693,0.00022370681,0.0006660837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99509436,0.0015821392,0.00069365144,0.00024721582,0.0005692403,0.0018134175],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042721257,0.0002463693,0.0006629426,0.000039991588,0.00078561896,0.00024890227,0.00042954687,0.0003155835,0.00020579761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014383034,0.00022461933,0.00034979612,0.0003411505,0.0033340517,0.00078999205,0.00002051219,0.0007805049,0.0000023068221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005237747,0.000013388331,0.000018939087,0.00001752099,0.0001541601,0.000054032844,0.3676449,0.0000051634747,0.0000040454424,0.6245321,0.00069304317,0.006810325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009351609,0.00037507317,0.0003471724,0.00030542345,0.00047268785,0.000066521396,0.17777488,0.000024177052,0.000010120221,0.14798456,0.6714427,0.00026153188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29493397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.577709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70247024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007674225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018388513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039212520","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2011/v14i7a2620","title":"Analysing the Onus Issue in Dismissals Emanating from the Enforcement of Unilateral Changes to Conditions of Employment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Appeal; Enforcement; Unfair dismissal; Collective bargaining; Legislature; Compliance (psychology); Law; Promotion (chess); Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.021897228404757003,"score_gpt":0.3507606884253308,"score_spread":0.3288634600205738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039212520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89349985,0.007884659,0.0005597099,0.06896668,0.001036545,0.0022703558,0.00017350698,0.000108625296,0.025500083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996313,0.0007196616,0.0003504933,0.0004281552,0.0011089002,0.00009361999,0.00001976731,0.00006960753,0.0008968291],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930931,0.0011268266,0.0014349428,0.0005984654,0.0017712316,0.0019754688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942946,0.00097206223,0.0020745595,0.0017795179,0.00050310884,0.00037613843],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004311779,0.000534434,0.001016345,0.00021746305,0.0036696706,0.00064282876,0.003575316,0.00023842767,0.00058907445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012448663,0.0003676156,0.00044303617,0.0006652476,0.001707644,0.0006803945,0.00054487557,0.0015374906,0.000022434398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089360034,0.0010468202,0.029826617,0.00010087128,0.00404139,0.00012638865,0.3663693,0.008790496,0.012788529,0.5473627,0.0044737915,0.024179524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005521128,0.0017499968,0.009373256,0.0016125847,0.0015936409,0.00003964433,0.09895571,0.00076073856,0.031380948,0.06619297,0.7807622,0.002057195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06749888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16312157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7762884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014952981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000816104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040069261","doi":"10.7202/1000628ar","title":"The Unfinished Project of Roncarelli v. Duplessis: Justiciability, Discretion, and the Limits of the Rule of Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Discretion; Supreme court; Political science; Justiciability; Economic Justice; Political question; Rule of law; Politics; Power (physics); Sociology","score_opus":0.057300528873199766,"score_gpt":0.31551749798359946,"score_spread":0.2582169691103997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040069261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06981707,0.0017684569,0.000047498637,0.002987326,0.0009967452,0.00077766035,0.00008009911,0.000017814136,0.92350733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99932456,0.00016935563,0.00021507351,0.000052650845,0.000081688646,0.0000062714416,1.1826644e-7,0.000008402877,0.00014185607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976722,0.0008635106,0.0005160562,0.000112444024,0.0006038288,0.00023198339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980891,0.00059798476,0.00056517404,0.00032501266,0.0003691362,0.0000535877],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027595279,0.0000960617,0.00024710147,0.000014662723,0.0027343454,0.0000359997,0.00077505514,0.00007796123,0.000051473147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064208865,0.000041426778,0.00016064817,0.00022133003,0.004601372,0.00014004455,0.00012114792,0.0002773895,9.788181e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001057531,0.00005996781,0.0011512337,0.000020933801,0.000051293824,5.3595727e-7,0.059490927,0.000004646506,0.000020171292,0.9383906,0.000028637789,0.0006752972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030101854,0.0003933474,0.008794478,0.00047457794,0.00079936127,0.000021855058,0.070324495,0.00009336666,0.0141843315,0.11585555,0.78561205,0.00043642454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01088159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010832033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9295075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031864216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005009645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99856395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040434443","doi":"10.1163/221097312x13397499736345","title":"The Constitutional Protection of Socio-Economic Rights in Selected African Countries: A Comparative Evaluation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Realisation; Democracy; Political science; Enforcement; Dictatorship; Constitutional court; Development economics; Economic growth; International human rights law; Law; Economics; Politics; Constitution","score_opus":0.05081557316831877,"score_gpt":0.3591895841450753,"score_spread":0.30837401097675654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040434443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8622779,0.013441765,0.00029008344,0.0076919515,0.0015203885,0.0014309443,0.000033552747,0.00003497251,0.11327841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991304,0.00006665819,0.00013897875,0.000006924686,0.00042721134,0.00003154689,6.0965243e-7,0.0000030746098,0.00019457392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972986,0.0007212325,0.0007563046,0.00013363369,0.00080846285,0.0002817468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99675447,0.00068082876,0.0009112593,0.000083726176,0.0015225994,0.000047141177],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026857872,0.00013046834,0.00041648457,0.0001453099,0.0009090031,0.00007216473,0.00027068617,0.000054596363,0.000028891665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051241665,0.00009018837,0.00009306613,0.0005233038,0.003292889,0.0003924966,0.000030790663,0.00025856146,0.000008097836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006791279,0.00023654239,0.009940744,0.000019988885,0.0006858972,0.000019249414,0.26205716,0.0032605643,0.00014887039,0.7161182,0.0063806437,0.00045301014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024452566,0.00065570895,0.010449335,0.00017901097,0.00026105027,0.000018496909,0.14354701,0.0003161157,0.00058475696,0.045093857,0.79602545,0.00042397744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004604509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00930126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7896448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001332033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011754318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99941957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043287644","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.05.007","title":"Land restitution and communal property associations: The Elandskloof case","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Land tenure; Legitimacy; Public administration; Sanctions; Business; Law; Political science; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.04251931802782195,"score_gpt":0.34582263592246687,"score_spread":0.30330331789464493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043287644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9687091,0.00012596422,0.000015312951,0.008213213,0.00025178795,0.00026190345,0.00006405791,0.00008536265,0.022273293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99534225,0.000046372916,0.00030962366,0.00036635832,0.00071785954,0.000011633033,0.0000052203122,0.0000056674544,0.0031949969],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925023,0.00018012726,0.00010148368,0.00009859559,0.00015976862,0.00020977185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994076,0.00018996536,0.00005432121,0.00019744811,0.000060805454,0.00008987789],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005316477,0.000064300606,0.00008138366,0.000036449168,0.0010596042,0.00025936318,0.0001432021,0.00009870628,0.000024997415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015375733,0.00003329779,0.00002170706,0.00019196837,0.00030395977,0.00022223132,0.00006051438,0.0002738934,0.00002415391],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010325499,0.000052707823,0.86377025,0.000004300526,0.000022203303,0.000060824663,0.079751156,0.000002542491,0.000023396238,0.053159542,0.0016134745,0.0015292795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005173838,0.000020114408,0.09290299,0.000008390137,0.000030068737,0.00006819966,0.00054975343,0.0001428817,0.000008847441,0.0018351354,0.9037595,0.00015674028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14629401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10188998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90214604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034124696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014623158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9144982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046066281","doi":"10.1002/iir.92","title":"The abuse of the process of the court in friendly sequestration proceedings in South Africa","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Citation; Law; Library science; Process (computing); Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03550360185464811,"score_gpt":0.3291719711877474,"score_spread":0.29366836933309926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046066281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22775097,0.15605097,0.000011100184,0.023932552,0.0019358813,0.0036426466,0.00005110167,0.00004761223,0.5865772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99254686,0.0065184454,0.00002835459,0.00011463703,0.000062425985,0.00007367564,3.24331e-7,0.0000061582073,0.000649148],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982178,0.00012850348,0.00056004303,0.00014955338,0.0007763478,0.00016773955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988713,0.00010710232,0.00045295246,0.00017170695,0.0003750731,0.000021848418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010677658,0.00008915366,0.00016888305,0.00003664147,0.000121615616,0.000035716985,0.0012931696,0.00005409809,0.00006389396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014711627,0.00004696104,0.00010151281,0.0008295995,0.0003716492,0.00025123294,0.000057845053,0.00022375559,0.000008728291],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001747357,0.0004971114,0.14000247,0.00092276325,0.00005051376,0.0000016408239,0.6711389,0.000040364812,0.00007733921,0.18069044,0.003035853,0.0035251768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005071085,0.000054203636,0.021320065,0.01106384,0.000062617175,0.0000013527832,0.0077730804,0.00053701346,0.00033924586,0.010831331,0.9471911,0.0003190138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001344335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027814528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9441553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012214221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000097197626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24030523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052087121","doi":"10.7202/042742ar","title":"L'aide sociale et le prêt, les droits extrapatrimoniaux et l'assurance-chômage","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Collège de Maisonneuve","funders":"","keywords":"Loan; Interpretation (philosophy); Welfare; Damages; Social Welfare; Political science; Scope (computer science); Section (typography); Unemployment; Social Security Act; Law; Social assistance; Sociology; Law and economics; Economics; Business; Economic growth; Social security; Finance","score_opus":0.01653360318679621,"score_gpt":0.28965251216867655,"score_spread":0.27311890898188035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052087121","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4257327,0.0021426883,0.004280625,0.015243051,0.00036805207,0.0004955262,0.00005555679,0.00059596763,0.5510858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94398665,0.00023715328,0.00824873,0.0018567528,0.00081511267,0.00004821962,0.000014124669,0.000061323226,0.044731945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709195,0.0004313168,0.00037305773,0.00049065583,0.0006995972,0.00091341656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855566,0.00047444078,0.00019938042,0.00037150018,0.00013035921,0.00026865525],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016101212,0.00026850883,0.00036243815,0.00013670312,0.0010737318,0.00030867703,0.00075078814,0.0005614937,0.00027107223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095808937,0.00031769855,0.00023840283,0.00053740555,0.0012827378,0.0008021257,0.000072233015,0.00087968446,0.00029635045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041782954,0.00019385322,0.0045058387,0.000038991635,0.000064289954,0.00005660377,0.16291474,0.00017147389,0.00078249275,0.78267026,0.0092242705,0.03933543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067638647,0.000034610355,0.002997806,0.00004018969,0.00003869127,0.0000037851541,0.008720719,0.000054204636,0.0007435848,0.022725847,0.96343666,0.0005275069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057428284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016450379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9542124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001045126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008102452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058095284","doi":"10.1163/15692108-12341243","title":"Land and Justice in South Africa: Exploring the Ambiguous Role of the State in the Land Claims Process","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African and Asian Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; State (computer science); Land reform; Land law; Land tenure; Politics; Land grabbing; Government (linguistics); Political science; Economic Justice; Commodity; Rurality; Political economy; Economic growth; Sociology; Law; Rural area; Agriculture; Economics; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.05593421277439234,"score_gpt":0.31190536240415956,"score_spread":0.2559711496297672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058095284","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9656874,0.010665354,6.920485e-7,0.0012021653,0.0001346109,0.00027490503,0.000008372158,0.000011125137,0.022015398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993192,0.00030236234,0.000010892603,0.000049203,0.00012863251,0.00006299715,9.001188e-8,0.000006297248,0.00012032232],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987653,0.00029037418,0.000169759,0.00013672124,0.00027840954,0.00035944357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994502,0.0002399728,0.00008566498,0.00014597946,0.00003596307,0.000042230997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094255945,0.00010731899,0.00019135124,0.00003956881,0.0004235193,0.00004624227,0.00026412887,0.000023578445,0.0000012212131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026791223,0.000050447987,0.000021533922,0.0005178709,0.000774007,0.00017118093,0.00013218592,0.00018519198,0.0000013330821],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008477379,0.000021196118,0.19442844,0.000020355488,0.0000134726215,9.430836e-7,0.8034327,0.0000021905516,0.0000013903046,0.00049888995,0.0000126104815,0.0015593029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019146172,0.000020298536,0.16967396,0.000039894996,0.00004334512,5.548185e-7,0.82111907,0.0000029041141,0.000010671363,0.0028161986,0.0059898393,0.00009182103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071377907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017642209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033631828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002195113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024871842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32574108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059962459","doi":"10.1353/cch.0.0030","title":"A Common Hunger: Land Rights in Canada and South Africa (review)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Colonialism and Colonial History","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Oppression; Dignity; Politics; Indigenous rights; Redress; Human rights; Government (linguistics); Pastoralism; Political science; Geography; Ethnology; History; Livestock; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.017780668623065134,"score_gpt":0.24214815238436516,"score_spread":0.22436748376130003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059962459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84408486,0.13963015,7.303369e-7,0.0018430372,0.0012743113,0.00022945693,0.000009138208,0.0000091200045,0.012919192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946679,0.0034394902,0.00008536036,0.00051869,0.00032818175,0.000005210925,3.639387e-7,0.0000067742285,0.00094804156],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982308,0.00032731044,0.0004714171,0.00014084789,0.0005383441,0.00029125146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894,0.00017737925,0.00038133195,0.000100711826,0.00012909004,0.00027147325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006535991,0.00012816122,0.00048634276,0.00010328965,0.00029988037,0.000009534539,0.00022956128,0.00009243756,0.00008125508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013398554,0.000115548704,0.00005000858,0.0001505037,0.0004981705,0.00017094504,0.000042946554,0.00033232826,0.0000021019314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074005174,0.00018609392,0.09886779,0.00024795465,0.00007124204,0.0039016588,0.6685264,0.0000052444593,0.00002401932,0.0031671226,0.22277841,0.0014839906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060940057,0.000117718075,0.015992813,0.00011883045,0.00004155086,0.000049779606,0.00016866534,0.0000023923553,0.0000010934449,0.00019943206,0.9825553,0.00014297402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8011415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94368607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75977695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014695077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002999349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53207165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061241455","doi":"10.1002/iir.139","title":"New legislative measures in South Africa aimed at combating over‐indebtedness—are the new proposals sufficient under the constitution and law in general?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Legislature; Constitution; Debt; Law; Bill of rights; State (computer science); Order (exchange); Constitutionalism; Consumer protection; Constitutional review; Economics; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Finance; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.046522426008477946,"score_gpt":0.33187570296776514,"score_spread":0.2853532769592872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061241455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026674716,0.3620139,0.0012465469,0.049031746,0.0018539556,0.0037281527,0.000050914197,0.00012454066,0.5552755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932456,0.0019988653,0.00020795787,0.0010776476,0.00033220285,0.000043405187,0.000007698306,0.000008774158,0.003077857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764204,0.00046410033,0.0005311458,0.00029709042,0.00077932194,0.00028629001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903774,0.0002642673,0.00030026986,0.00019289833,0.00013677348,0.000068049005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012212567,0.0001658391,0.00026282758,0.00005998141,0.00033689695,0.00013888857,0.00053202914,0.000076879005,0.00017468499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044536867,0.00010252292,0.00007819958,0.0005126875,0.00049336476,0.00025711695,0.00014838569,0.00026252898,0.000028111705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020683954,0.00009916999,0.017654259,0.000064385276,0.00003690426,0.000015130263,0.072428115,0.00045742665,0.000039881485,0.8994209,0.0069513842,0.0028117204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005848125,0.000018974217,0.0066735954,0.001978584,0.00003885512,0.0000031415402,0.002428483,0.00018093629,0.000029892251,0.012569404,0.97522146,0.0002718864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015448658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024332684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96827006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044089483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036502746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9934707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064755567","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12342042","title":"Competing Competences in Adjudication: Reviewing the Relationship between the ECOWAS Court and National Courts","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Complementarity (molecular biology); Economic Justice; Political science; Institution; Law; International law; Public administration","score_opus":0.11394445736055644,"score_gpt":0.3808152849352499,"score_spread":0.2668708275746935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064755567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5497626,0.06901369,0.00024684466,0.26431352,0.0011750424,0.0006794374,0.000009171193,0.000044662866,0.11475503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976137,0.00051054393,0.00047184387,0.0002754981,0.0010429594,0.000006318186,2.6137965e-7,0.000005869287,0.00007300375],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971315,0.0010952734,0.0005826979,0.00012001176,0.00084653974,0.00022394196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900571,0.0085268095,0.0006297005,0.00010177635,0.0006157888,0.000068802714],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008144116,0.00010675958,0.0003221934,0.00007818163,0.0013132838,0.00012979022,0.00047216294,0.00003463334,0.0000072829043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012402151,0.000059903356,0.000068811496,0.00043399812,0.0011686725,0.00032979235,0.00009236851,0.00043892578,0.000005462443],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007653903,0.000014368272,0.7569418,0.000016461952,0.00008476662,0.000002899535,0.1239983,0.000046203542,8.4496963e-7,0.115835175,0.0015528967,0.0014986617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028887068,0.000079761965,0.40290082,0.0003235659,0.00008721186,0.000008271852,0.07586919,0.00002173717,0.0000017434284,0.019227235,0.50103647,0.00015512563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013861796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025957183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4994836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014192448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001576672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067271657","doi":"10.4000/chs.850","title":"« It's a Mystery » : the Royal Prerogative of Mercy in England, Canada and South Africa","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Crime Histoire et Sociétés","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Prerogative; Meaning (existential); Deliberation; Law; Lottery; Sociology; History; Political science; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04635659208524007,"score_gpt":0.33230454601338405,"score_spread":0.285947953928144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067271657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1777206,0.077951066,0.0000061101405,0.020475939,0.003513107,0.00076115265,0.00023791124,0.000040836687,0.7192933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87225765,0.00016208117,0.00008655914,0.00053014915,0.00020322305,0.000031812644,0.0000036076146,0.000026170383,0.12669872],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965706,0.0011794097,0.00052695523,0.00043766072,0.00066280016,0.0006225625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983174,0.0008023282,0.00021576359,0.00036387722,0.00010690455,0.00019367959],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008916918,0.00029259376,0.000499956,0.000041245414,0.0006101042,0.00005205279,0.0005156359,0.00025124816,0.00468505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003351106,0.00025346607,0.000111770794,0.00044843374,0.0024098814,0.00019869018,0.00010406679,0.00057726726,0.000040453357],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005328767,0.000086601256,0.000758386,0.00005682284,0.000055123164,0.000038783928,0.9609129,0.000058162423,0.0000028235052,0.0019718166,0.013851132,0.022154205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006943361,0.00006430672,0.0010706898,0.00010529158,0.00009683604,8.943396e-7,0.043524653,0.000103450744,0.000012145326,0.0007301552,0.9533119,0.0002853029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6408555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5712914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9394608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008568769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012468796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070403052","doi":"10.1163/221097312x13397499736589","title":"Protecting Human Rights amidst Poverty and Inequality: The South African Post-apartheid Experience on the Right of Access to Housing","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Poverty; Democracy; State (computer science); Political science; Constitution; Politics; Development economics; Economic growth; International human rights law; Population; Fundamental rights; Inequality; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.10854540699747733,"score_gpt":0.3684019043684768,"score_spread":0.2598564973709995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070403052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9735345,0.0007249481,0.000030496263,0.010751085,0.0002635087,0.00047921468,0.000009001709,0.000027092898,0.014180125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99856824,0.00002329519,0.00011681859,0.00061305676,0.00046400077,0.000020496607,6.6225965e-8,0.000014596018,0.00017942495],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965831,0.0008872688,0.000697216,0.00025071774,0.0011197244,0.00046198725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99687976,0.0010584231,0.0008581855,0.0003034725,0.00073040504,0.00016977884],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021311892,0.00023238889,0.00054314075,0.00013233912,0.0042821807,0.00018952847,0.0010675899,0.000049371163,0.000024795347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020961238,0.00011392961,0.00014631268,0.00081611896,0.0019058111,0.00052123866,0.00033768258,0.00054531003,0.000002789221],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012954573,0.00007475038,0.0054906607,0.000011376711,0.00018539185,0.00006550864,0.9829276,0.000023193339,0.0002704431,0.009852563,0.00070365524,0.00026526905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008671141,0.0019455196,0.0154950265,0.00054055057,0.00018621306,0.00005757283,0.7094661,0.000005159667,0.00486776,0.0041410644,0.26161584,0.0008121043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022930678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001462053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27346155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018151033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011449594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074741131","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2003.tb00910.x","title":"Governing the multicultural city‐region","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Ontario; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Immigration; Multiculturalism; Recreation; Settlement (finance); Legislature; Local government; Government (linguistics); Business; Finance","score_opus":0.04796019242221597,"score_gpt":0.2990276706229065,"score_spread":0.25106747820069053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074741131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1267331,0.00029047683,0.00034028664,0.13142435,0.0014309202,0.00067601586,0.000024963501,0.00015153635,0.7389284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909763,0.000003873892,0.00013065207,0.00065225555,0.00023992895,0.000018381319,0.00001599763,0.000006625254,0.007956018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987956,0.00023301433,0.00013084461,0.00015968528,0.000267793,0.00041301583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990839,0.00007716229,0.000066803404,0.00017321306,0.00012854901,0.0004704098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004542848,0.000080004436,0.00006174999,0.000042126558,0.0012740032,0.00044282994,0.00024355225,0.00010487422,0.0004636461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017897342,0.00006390279,0.000038462058,0.00035518693,0.0002579014,0.000419843,0.0000051315096,0.00014858034,0.00012289254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013795388,0.000010284358,0.007811631,0.0000016592704,0.000009024953,0.000021777525,0.02281087,3.7823676e-7,0.0000050291987,0.9559129,0.012416286,0.0009988154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062332816,0.000013402034,0.00061607215,0.000002052168,0.000004634055,0.0000041084204,0.0077339164,0.000012752901,0.000016515249,0.00024255944,0.991197,0.00009466753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015419801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73173076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9787807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005043575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022477456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076253832","doi":"10.1002/(sici)1099-1107(200021)9:1<65::aid-iir61>3.0.co;2-0","title":"A perspective on the doctrine of voidable dispositions in South African insolvency law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Insolvency; Perspective (graphical); Law; Citation; Political science; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.03038050590296959,"score_gpt":0.355158790273849,"score_spread":0.3247782843708794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076253832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048338682,0.021586329,0.000008318643,0.022899814,0.00022910113,0.000737677,0.000070590344,0.00003900929,0.9495953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821315,0.010669812,0.00011243333,0.0021668521,0.000177518,0.0001452109,0.000006575866,0.00001131342,0.0045788125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980628,0.0002943294,0.00046116716,0.00027075966,0.0006585896,0.0002523538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988744,0.00033586854,0.00016384301,0.00030195512,0.00025403,0.00006987669],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077084557,0.00013839583,0.00027165306,0.00008189671,0.00019969644,0.000042747135,0.00082986715,0.000054018758,0.008025964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065727724,0.00010356463,0.0001726977,0.0007240724,0.00039327692,0.00023451127,0.00004542351,0.00027412723,0.00036237104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021247552,0.00025856632,0.0003566459,0.000045375902,0.000033653967,0.000008129161,0.038237616,0.00001569817,0.000005210704,0.95835394,0.0011197535,0.0015441515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020805198,0.00007407981,0.00056856556,0.0021429022,0.000030253057,9.630613e-7,0.0023298275,0.000014735348,0.000022829521,0.012851535,0.98157716,0.00017909828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058928425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016836203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9804574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043351436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012823027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9928808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076287430","doi":"10.7202/043335ar","title":"Secret professionnel et signalement de situations de compromission chez l'enfant : un dilemme à résoudre","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.021278968814574632,"score_gpt":0.30023262674390994,"score_spread":0.2789536579293353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076287430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8330588,0.004810928,0.048776835,0.06782669,0.00084598473,0.0011158554,0.0001586633,0.00030093265,0.043105353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9157834,0.00037357738,0.02907873,0.0030529725,0.001049701,0.00010453412,0.000054505028,0.0000595876,0.050442997],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995496,0.0012673517,0.0005588403,0.00053909543,0.0007384239,0.0014003414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978466,0.0004970393,0.00030195946,0.00041515255,0.00012280972,0.0008164146],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024049554,0.0003639964,0.00039620692,0.000117558426,0.0013717082,0.00017036495,0.0007331064,0.0007946387,0.004095761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043970396,0.00039674918,0.00024825847,0.00059393083,0.0011195502,0.00038738834,0.00016072686,0.0012822008,0.00044909053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005971516,0.0006053016,0.004773611,0.00011710911,0.00014301806,0.000074913325,0.7383108,0.0017492281,0.0038025726,0.20918493,0.009318463,0.031860325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017502665,0.00020440464,0.004645858,0.0006526355,0.00042206276,0.000025615802,0.063840516,0.017511426,0.004883289,0.08456954,0.82025874,0.0012356483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017168453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009952573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81094027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047602793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009818752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076433970","doi":"10.1002/iir.86","title":"Reform of South African insolvency law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Insolvency; Law; Political science; History; Art history","score_opus":0.048313854475952885,"score_gpt":0.36451579135873374,"score_spread":0.31620193688278087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076433970","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014912194,0.05135913,0.00009214553,0.0045586317,0.0009799226,0.00037225333,0.000032536285,0.000090416084,0.94102377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9497447,0.042898294,0.00073773833,0.0014699998,0.00045178438,0.000049594106,0.000015851627,0.000018893437,0.00461315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976398,0.0001431575,0.0006709849,0.00028998795,0.0009355078,0.00032056682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985884,0.000069987414,0.0003796102,0.00036494178,0.00045046164,0.00014658937],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090495846,0.00016103341,0.0003675069,0.00008833326,0.00017305551,0.000039449,0.0010936734,0.0000899565,0.0033501887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040646305,0.0001443809,0.00023466207,0.0005718697,0.00042024822,0.00042898091,0.00012625246,0.00019926671,0.00037252743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021069864,0.00022358198,0.0026793773,0.00032485262,0.000092275666,0.00003193812,0.01888775,0.0000012858086,0.000025512583,0.9638334,0.0021603566,0.011718617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012727002,0.000034144192,0.00021206068,0.0012888439,0.000032190113,0.0000030313463,0.00079277623,0.0000034373727,0.000018979921,0.0028665387,0.99445444,0.00016625707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004502416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008744646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99229413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035407775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015134139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99756086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077618305","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12342020","title":"The Lesotho Constitution and Doctrine of Separation of Powers: Reflections on the Judicial Attitude","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Separation of powers; Doctrine; Law; Democracy; Political science; Government (linguistics); Politics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07608136454369334,"score_gpt":0.41773993300588264,"score_spread":0.3416585684621893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077618305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6547259,0.014981796,0.00026326813,0.04819831,0.0016771175,0.000757128,0.000010425837,0.000022751843,0.2793633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982918,0.0009112358,0.00017735267,0.00005477152,0.0002667152,0.0000057631587,5.7408275e-8,0.000002713625,0.00028957368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985951,0.00028419372,0.00042636288,0.00007275543,0.0004657559,0.00015578754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977412,0.000873003,0.00055405096,0.00010018598,0.000684748,0.000046760484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011454242,0.00008014539,0.00023426468,0.000062470746,0.0008007581,0.000055525423,0.00021223494,0.00003143822,0.000017894916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015225975,0.000042344956,0.00007890651,0.00033379468,0.0020830845,0.00025510584,0.000044705463,0.00018764292,0.0000037802517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001830023,0.00013655085,0.0035765197,0.000015545058,0.00067228865,0.000005587767,0.18981425,0.00007468759,0.0017095545,0.79014194,0.010030466,0.0036395898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081497064,0.0016736803,0.007735246,0.0002407218,0.00028326546,0.000016619684,0.26839694,0.0000072333573,0.0019887232,0.022318358,0.6962722,0.00025206525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008854947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006331835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7678236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008506714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001441107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7675212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079586111","doi":"10.1590/s0104-026x2006000200005","title":"Violência doméstica e Juizados Especiais Criminais: análise a partir do feminismo e do garantismo","year":2006,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Estudos Feministas","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Gender studies; Feminism; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030021622989282442,"score_gpt":0.32021316021112695,"score_spread":0.2901915372218445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079586111","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06626614,0.07259175,0.0006389593,0.0047057127,0.0055145565,0.0064478135,0.0016925416,0.0017094769,0.84043306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9454066,0.0017284756,0.00065785524,0.00050640665,0.0036175265,0.00025961324,0.00014031323,0.00029790573,0.047385264],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856235,0.0015662856,0.0030292782,0.002923011,0.0034378443,0.0034201033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919421,0.0015932963,0.0015729527,0.002849291,0.0007429048,0.0012994538],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003049809,0.0018542772,0.0025749288,0.0004683674,0.002565474,0.0036631331,0.0030400704,0.0012335214,0.005861083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017469805,0.0019238766,0.0011844352,0.0033144245,0.0030394627,0.00072883477,0.0009228852,0.0015866591,0.010091148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007038277,0.0035844715,0.02793661,0.0017466245,0.0006050326,0.002921089,0.18135636,0.000029296225,0.00033603417,0.16466549,0.6065373,0.00957788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016562033,0.0004715276,0.0042285137,0.0012530815,0.001573928,0.000029321796,0.015027766,0.000050137867,0.0001624747,0.0010198128,0.9721792,0.002348031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007573787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021777235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8791405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010283862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001178591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083274652","doi":"10.4314/aa.v8i1.23104","title":"The Changing Family Structure and Legal Lag in Lesotho: Implications for the Future","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Anthropologist","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Population; Law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Proclamation; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Geography; Demography; Politics","score_opus":0.02536751942573162,"score_gpt":0.3520677738474582,"score_spread":0.32670025442172657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083274652","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07379165,0.042320054,0.0026561175,0.7957862,0.0031850797,0.0026197892,0.00028863645,0.00032101647,0.07903147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942925,0.002193507,0.00032206083,0.00041517272,0.0008689216,0.000067473506,0.0000028716715,0.000012326864,0.0018251862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987698,0.00013138234,0.00016431458,0.00024053603,0.00014462776,0.0005493182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875885,0.00071375316,0.00008567442,0.00031032608,0.00006516993,0.00006620072],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005512343,0.00011757094,0.00012927447,0.000050399645,0.00299266,0.00022057143,0.000535119,0.000104424376,0.000029591907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002799394,0.00006762749,0.000047623285,0.0006807173,0.00515067,0.00011986029,0.000094590396,0.00020396635,0.0000029976975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029302935,0.000022423052,0.012237721,0.0000033262636,0.000019587573,0.0000048347447,0.037663072,0.000007195227,0.000040616756,0.9073087,0.0055324426,0.037130784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011391893,0.000023822908,0.008958886,0.000002454512,0.0000101693495,0.0000025612947,0.17805688,0.000023338464,0.0000047212584,0.0038057235,0.8089055,0.00009204599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00606012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03583754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9205008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009553223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000092359754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085159431","doi":"10.1080/714003705","title":"Human Rights in Foreign Policy: Lessons for South Africa from Canadian Experience?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Multilateralism; Hypocrisy; Diplomacy; Political science; Foreign policy; International human rights law; Constructive; Right to property; Government (linguistics); Linguistic rights; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.051973596459282186,"score_gpt":0.37092084931500063,"score_spread":0.31894725285571845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085159431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83050716,0.00010814147,0.000058080273,0.004865788,0.0006689352,0.00025057752,0.000058312737,0.000018618572,0.16346438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929697,0.0000012084201,0.00019728164,0.00015266683,0.0028906884,0.000013504893,0.0000061033033,0.000011029202,0.0037578105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977947,0.00014470507,0.0005354985,0.00018141657,0.00088807306,0.0004556335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985585,0.00017481744,0.00036806014,0.00019377407,0.00042149035,0.0002833253],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006603434,0.00014991083,0.00023112923,0.00049160863,0.0013906648,0.00025483777,0.0020027347,0.00010507491,0.00069052563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008797807,0.00010055242,0.00017083585,0.00021382334,0.00039205782,0.00038030645,0.000051399813,0.00028566975,0.000028602844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003177018,0.0000502788,0.00076907355,4.139774e-7,0.00006840625,0.00014281548,0.22549333,0.000017190996,0.000074947384,0.77150244,0.001810981,0.000038373415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058516307,0.000048731137,0.0011679862,0.000045393746,0.000014626296,0.0000059082145,0.0026270507,0.000010134695,0.00014883575,0.5327686,0.46244177,0.00013578279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36276957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69377476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46063077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008562132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033105162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088114035","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2009/v12i2a2728","title":"Die Impak en Grondwetlikheid van die Reg om te Staak met Betrekking tot Noodsaaklike Dienste – 'n Vergelykende Studie","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Constitution; Political science; Position (finance); Law; Business","score_opus":0.018726474126044543,"score_gpt":0.3248098539873243,"score_spread":0.30608337986127976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088114035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5674891,0.11020809,0.0028894434,0.028408615,0.011391711,0.0055720652,0.00041945846,0.0031213292,0.2705002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97123235,0.010510727,0.0017869596,0.00048575108,0.006693169,0.00021371472,0.000048847647,0.00051539147,0.00851311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97887313,0.0024869677,0.002784799,0.0026072413,0.004420616,0.008827223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986913,0.0012970569,0.0036693674,0.0043577403,0.001273049,0.0024897777],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008624817,0.0022473931,0.0028500992,0.00063932635,0.016014755,0.0040384056,0.00756333,0.0012890352,0.000745123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038073547,0.0021534383,0.0018244493,0.00073685823,0.0033724783,0.004914431,0.0019751012,0.0069012092,0.0005659878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004174189,0.003774191,0.03141099,0.00051575684,0.016006324,0.0050615515,0.2009827,0.0008471684,0.0053431247,0.4993709,0.011594713,0.2209184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005475838,0.0017754141,0.0010780033,0.0004051751,0.0012686684,0.00019580487,0.018810477,0.000092773975,0.0024500606,0.034496997,0.93100876,0.0029420604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009384535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056371726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91941404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008707612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031452489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089950863","doi":"10.1177/0021934707306569","title":"<i>Baker</i> Revisited 2007","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Black Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Supreme court; Duty; Law; Racism; Immigration; Politics; Restitution; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04994834571938465,"score_gpt":0.39739064332305907,"score_spread":0.3474422976036744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089950863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14580901,0.07051059,0.00085408596,0.007981049,0.0043853563,0.0003049698,0.000004679033,0.00008831616,0.77006197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863247,0.003068472,0.0019181912,0.00064894994,0.0028939229,2.7338388e-7,9.0384454e-8,0.000010449808,0.005134906],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818105,0.00011267776,0.00054492947,0.00009292292,0.00070921116,0.00035922904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979313,0.00048790372,0.00044985182,0.000112254944,0.00086080923,0.00015786428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037813731,0.00010034322,0.00034469584,0.00011952841,0.0003027865,0.00004085064,0.00029436775,0.00006744894,0.000096274794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022357565,0.000077833676,0.00014526218,0.00042683727,0.00061494985,0.0002624251,0.000064787804,0.00025647532,0.00011955302],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016665856,0.00013964914,0.019641997,0.00005327906,0.0005803035,0.00046218513,0.44400707,0.000011548199,0.0001506407,0.0155315995,0.5135497,0.0057053976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026865708,0.00008876804,0.0012645217,0.0000868195,0.000058664224,0.0000044085727,0.035562776,3.170433e-7,0.00010423122,0.002093414,0.9603618,0.000105666935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021141614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006338567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84051573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018742772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008005678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31739652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094771148","doi":"10.1080/13218711003739516","title":"Families Impacted by the Criminal Justice System on the Frontier: A New Model Required","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychiatry Psychology and Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Magistrate; Economic Justice; Frontier; Criminal justice; Imprisonment; Criminology; Domestic violence; Sociology; Law; Political science; History; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.02688341621342481,"score_gpt":0.3334904379082711,"score_spread":0.30660702169484627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094771148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17741205,0.0026931178,0.00087383715,0.06463403,0.009988643,0.0005569555,0.00004360822,0.00024564913,0.7435521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98498774,0.00007087962,0.0010524933,0.009818564,0.0010380159,0.000022949762,0.0000026084472,0.000017593795,0.002989153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998384,0.0003198636,0.00022603666,0.00036040018,0.0002653806,0.00044429992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988464,0.00022092256,0.00011830405,0.0005918136,0.00004441383,0.00017813235],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007870415,0.0001802296,0.00017868324,0.000028178767,0.0015695711,0.00011858925,0.00069313764,0.0003006937,0.00010242587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010400086,0.0001040833,0.00007199523,0.00019086429,0.0013430202,0.00012813181,0.000038224225,0.00069509866,0.00009787777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097920674,0.0000556513,0.00024779062,0.000015039335,0.000029863815,7.53208e-7,0.03361815,0.0000023398868,0.0001109278,0.78583246,0.17936048,0.0006286255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013070216,0.00021697811,0.0008581319,0.00004915922,0.0006919337,0.000023228182,0.05097089,0.0006871152,0.0000135687405,0.045807734,0.8988617,0.0005125146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010904131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015957358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8075757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015140573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011090828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094877933","doi":"10.1007/s12142-005-1017-9","title":"Dignity, discrimination, and context: New directions in South African and Canadian human rights law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Human rights; Law; Political science; Legislature; Plaintiff; Substantive rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.042610148228079146,"score_gpt":0.3346408859805842,"score_spread":0.2920307377525051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094877933","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0317308,0.13758716,0.0000050111826,0.006528301,0.00019497836,0.0018883961,0.000040325445,0.00018253669,0.8218425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900797,0.0007235143,0.0000885392,0.00043758884,0.00031667695,0.000029139066,0.000012612447,0.000012694573,0.008299562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822634,0.00028915028,0.0003884518,0.00038409547,0.000276081,0.00043589246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989014,0.000058556237,0.000112301605,0.00025077874,0.000076454344,0.0006004537],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005038483,0.00019467525,0.0003943293,0.00014995135,0.0029096412,0.00019264696,0.00024891904,0.00009426571,0.0007296544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003668727,0.00015549008,0.00005436779,0.00032919314,0.0006224239,0.00041409972,0.000046276233,0.00021273161,0.000074476804],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.499568e-7,0.000029417855,0.00047183337,0.00011540213,0.00001151603,0.000009979953,0.065444365,5.0239134e-8,6.090189e-7,0.928391,0.002560815,0.0029644594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000190965,0.00001760285,0.0012987212,0.00066122867,0.000058408437,0.0000013148748,0.00020253455,4.5308138e-7,0.0000026898351,0.026583295,0.97075135,0.00023141333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6392831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99304014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96819055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027519348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008020717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096974502","doi":"10.1080/0042098042000226957","title":"Privatising Cape Town: From Apartheid to Neo-liberalism in the Mother City","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Urban Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegemony; Ideology; Dominance (genetics); Liberalism; Politics; Sociology; Cape; Urban politics; Government (linguistics); Political economy; Autonomy; Public administration; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07695537889438255,"score_gpt":0.3621353132828267,"score_spread":0.2851799343884442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096974502","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8872447,0.008374429,0.00007104614,0.02319719,0.00061450264,0.00054376567,0.000014722917,0.000113574744,0.079826064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99318254,0.00004590344,0.001372954,0.0028877512,0.0006039652,0.00003510847,7.6102026e-7,0.000010621719,0.0018604138],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986223,0.00015687053,0.00019140719,0.0002515617,0.00041980666,0.0003580703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928916,0.00027390954,0.00005094868,0.0002685176,0.000061024395,0.000056458455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048747822,0.00012823606,0.00021480802,0.00004231449,0.00044573154,0.00009501632,0.0004431526,0.00005544091,0.00008326945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058476784,0.00008986022,0.000046368146,0.000456986,0.00031360053,0.00014239515,0.00012438357,0.00014851558,0.000102815684],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063685807,0.00003265463,0.016735377,0.0000016648441,0.000034474953,0.000012363508,0.96317726,0.000031794032,0.000014448126,0.0099427365,0.009335783,0.000675082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043032216,0.000042436244,0.019083885,0.00008413759,0.00002397788,2.0779744e-7,0.06593522,8.3006785e-7,0.00010085246,0.04921664,0.8647882,0.00029332814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008713623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008212452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.897242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018500948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004584318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99788743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098264719","doi":"10.1002/iir.1212","title":"Treatment of a Debtor's Home in Insolvency: Comparative Perspectives and Potential Developments in South Africa","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Insolvency; Creditor; Statutory law; Estate; Bankruptcy; Business; Law; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Economics; Debt; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.05246384574752867,"score_gpt":0.3532636275689038,"score_spread":0.3007997818213751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098264719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5365886,0.35333768,0.00006203882,0.0032667622,0.00084665656,0.0030768823,0.000053838077,0.00006250669,0.10270505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9735398,0.0243991,0.0012557065,0.000041537307,0.000058440175,0.00019920606,0.0000056630997,0.000007335255,0.0004931639],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831504,0.00020522068,0.0005151618,0.00029957216,0.00041968626,0.00024531872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928606,0.00008183784,0.00019379554,0.00011818829,0.00023866133,0.00008148725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020975665,0.00016061147,0.00043220958,0.0002034224,0.00005720883,0.00004475069,0.0003079897,0.0000638682,0.0003996349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000160096,0.00013974591,0.00007528023,0.00041335818,0.00023757727,0.00040568993,0.000062220235,0.00009497646,0.00007826232],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029487484,0.00095217046,0.060929976,0.0001703173,0.00012085258,0.000033622448,0.9093432,0.000010147758,0.000054252425,0.016712941,0.00022545281,0.011417575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045627463,0.00063576474,0.24980529,0.006681564,0.00011000849,0.000008584262,0.05526623,0.00031634446,0.00007393692,0.009393582,0.6717288,0.0014171776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012663614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029093504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.854077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046086265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001807054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5698673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098509544","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.47.2.427","title":"Crime and Crime Prevention in South Africa: 10 Years After","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Law enforcement; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Politics; Political science; Crime prevention; Law; Criminology; Economic Justice; Criminal law; Civil society; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.07994079659052933,"score_gpt":0.32064880576170973,"score_spread":0.2407080091711804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098509544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9683483,0.010638247,0.00027290694,0.0017523022,0.00045210947,0.00022641534,0.000026495218,0.00003093982,0.01825228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99151486,0.00056037697,0.004785798,0.000969568,0.0006976804,0.000024725947,0.000003192942,0.000041859916,0.0014019298],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99570394,0.0009223711,0.0007633591,0.0005063511,0.00017156462,0.0019324429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996216,0.00084676384,0.00039458636,0.000311883,0.0003736805,0.0018571048],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024511723,0.0003662598,0.00062290503,0.0009735645,0.00041823598,0.00020211091,0.00065575144,0.0007121401,0.00042100795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005309591,0.0004228899,0.0001336165,0.00020704647,0.0015822696,0.00059232675,0.00008099716,0.0012663961,0.00002961252],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004914541,0.00011611145,0.003184082,0.00093701726,0.00011427979,0.0071497634,0.84580255,0.00017113879,0.00012031009,0.11367679,0.0011980343,0.027038446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002547202,0.0012605841,0.20186116,0.0007372942,0.010234659,0.0026808747,0.58028793,0.00019784657,0.000090404654,0.011376751,0.18725476,0.0014705176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008542458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08055308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2655146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012641987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003932742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098776700","doi":"10.1108/10222529201000011","title":"Applying the Canadian “reasonable expectation of profit” test to a section 80M(1)(d) reportable arrangement","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Meditari Accountancy Research","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Section (typography); Profit (economics); Actuarial science; Indigenous; Engineering; Economics; Business; Finance; Microeconomics; Advertising","score_opus":0.07524187460895183,"score_gpt":0.425843313522879,"score_spread":0.3506014389139272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098776700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.421631,0.0004033978,0.000051304614,0.015226241,0.005246754,0.007822218,0.000041979627,0.00013133851,0.54944575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98943377,0.000008695745,0.00059904857,0.000091926115,0.0019374213,0.0025002153,0.000008828587,0.000021328446,0.005398797],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958216,0.00021730259,0.00032173665,0.00036347497,0.0023696914,0.00090621365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708116,0.0006365413,0.00009733675,0.00057310873,0.0012259503,0.00038592334],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007318027,0.000111547415,0.00016124183,0.00034510333,0.0018634162,0.00027264826,0.0007434363,0.00017893194,0.0010365687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006929806,0.000090391775,0.000043582644,0.0017147438,0.00044584073,0.00040348354,0.00009417285,0.00090873084,0.00018192997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007310629,0.00020326629,0.42113143,0.00011396202,0.000066529086,0.00008883507,0.3832207,0.000026081487,0.015957443,0.02333967,0.14239569,0.013383277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012934246,0.0000656038,0.008627774,0.000035515233,0.000008544475,0.0000018026384,0.02484905,0.00003792979,0.0012978477,0.001262433,0.96354264,0.00014154184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7355582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96111125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8211469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069461635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002094874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100324937","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00355.x","title":"Difficult but Not Impossible: The ANC's Decentralization Strategy in South Africa","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Development and Change","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Disadvantaged; Dispose pattern; Metropolitan area; Public administration; Globe; Economic growth; Population; Government (linguistics); Private sector; Local government; Service delivery framework; Service (business); Political science; Economics; Sociology; Economy; Engineering; Market economy","score_opus":0.06990704449413995,"score_gpt":0.29126379384606244,"score_spread":0.22135674935192248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100324937","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98604065,0.0013013057,0.00006974024,0.0012544628,0.00019954977,0.00043180923,0.00000571075,0.00006644771,0.010630309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99853176,0.000099907695,0.00022689604,0.00017233624,0.00014584711,0.000057208785,0.000007688175,0.0000071452628,0.00075120886],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898946,0.000052509637,0.00015441628,0.00017380534,0.00028165718,0.00034812643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972576,0.00002227237,0.000051392362,0.000076185206,0.000043891414,0.00008048524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003020315,0.00009863169,0.000093478615,0.000049765033,0.00037538135,0.00012004892,0.00016451771,0.000079046426,0.000039132894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045102137,0.00007124667,0.000012352556,0.00046055432,0.00012109018,0.00016157623,0.000044920762,0.000085631946,0.000028976609],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008281124,0.000029791563,0.0058328356,0.0000066964562,0.0000054036664,0.000007806799,0.9834168,0.0000050298568,0.000021453006,0.006056469,0.000057239664,0.0045521893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022247795,0.00006510992,0.3452887,0.00015627484,0.000025661682,0.0000012586752,0.15246436,0.000027747437,0.0026715174,0.0022641039,0.49388275,0.00092773704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038205084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021578819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83095247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012804654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001555737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2905355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101482872","doi":"10.7196/samj.8608","title":"The state of our prisons and what this reveals about our society","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"South African Medical Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; State (computer science); Prison; Democracy; Public administration; Subsistence agriculture; Economic growth; Law; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.011632435305029892,"score_gpt":0.3184013427659796,"score_spread":0.3067689074609497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101482872","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045438853,0.019265486,0.00039912097,0.016576484,0.956908,0.0005539825,0.00017651032,0.00010592454,0.005560113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.067559354,0.022861827,0.00067579077,0.00032266873,0.89646685,0.000023512628,0.000011458302,0.000103687344,0.011974837],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98695195,0.0020026925,0.0014213942,0.00058737455,0.0076156105,0.0014209927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992125,0.0023063195,0.0019379045,0.0005942651,0.0011001946,0.001936361],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015086441,0.00051188475,0.0011478233,0.00011331743,0.0021969294,0.0016779037,0.0025379774,0.001411744,0.00010456528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024878409,0.00033966286,0.0006477136,0.0005179625,0.0014668223,0.00048716532,0.00047572266,0.0053502694,0.000065435335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041436557,0.000026332242,0.000050869003,0.000048285492,0.0001855422,0.000025036563,0.15442957,4.634656e-7,5.7514023e-7,0.00008208238,0.82667315,0.018436689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054416124,0.00011635347,0.000012361264,0.00065348577,0.0001513218,0.000004759893,0.092665255,0.000010952654,6.703135e-7,0.0019640268,0.90352815,0.00034849244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002664281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016006375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07685503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034433845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004272051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103535062","doi":"10.1002/iir.1211","title":"Consumer Debt Relief in South Africa—Should the Insolvency System Provide for NINA Debtors? Lessons from New Zealand","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Creditor; Insolvency; Debt; Poverty; Economics; Business; Financial system; Economy; Finance; Economic growth","score_opus":0.0770305411021622,"score_gpt":0.36116952914453876,"score_spread":0.2841389880423766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103535062","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014313239,0.64469457,0.0016665574,0.120308995,0.009648513,0.015538231,0.0006294464,0.0007776486,0.19242279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.955893,0.016478436,0.002829059,0.0019515292,0.0013641693,0.0017162699,0.00007300729,0.00007007575,0.019624466],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701554,0.00027384405,0.0008643638,0.0005214889,0.00080310757,0.00052166637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977949,0.00068712654,0.00043125145,0.00047560062,0.00039362293,0.00021749684],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009492355,0.0002678406,0.00049506745,0.00012652212,0.00030641857,0.00032359498,0.0014789284,0.00017541947,0.00078943727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017430864,0.00020046392,0.00026139253,0.00048347138,0.00023600741,0.00053461915,0.00014802514,0.00036317142,0.000806688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086855965,0.00051640306,0.03130143,0.0012471173,0.00052172225,0.000035277317,0.27176479,0.000015980611,0.000067547284,0.1563082,0.467583,0.070551686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040623214,0.000028833203,0.0010229805,0.0028815058,0.00007570903,0.0000011176891,0.0013814504,0.00008123946,0.0000071314143,0.0057175816,0.9881237,0.00027253068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030691007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004040912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94157976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000487773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005115839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105418881","doi":"10.24124/c677/20078","title":"Multi-level Governance: Getting the Job Done and Respecting Community Difference – Three Winnipeg Cases","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Political Science Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Flexibility (engineering); Corporate governance; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Variety (cybernetics); Administration (probate law); Order (exchange); Political science; Multi-level governance; Business; Public relations; Economics; Law; Politics; Management; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.13177384451653296,"score_gpt":0.39242586006863867,"score_spread":0.2606520155521057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105418881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3437188,0.22753847,0.00073785556,0.120452136,0.0014340311,0.0031962153,0.00023914449,0.00027511132,0.30240825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910924,0.001154815,0.001037285,0.0060437955,0.00021040926,0.000008770774,4.460625e-7,0.000009352585,0.0004427288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957355,0.00038034105,0.0003688981,0.00033488328,0.0007532165,0.0024271503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99496233,0.0016580744,0.00010833495,0.00056030817,0.00024001986,0.0024709022],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011716174,0.00016878697,0.0002850503,0.00006239324,0.00452404,0.00028371537,0.0013675784,0.000078345765,0.00008474154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02605508,0.00012211467,0.00005896855,0.0013540746,0.005163744,0.0002992869,0.00021933917,0.0006957032,0.000038823382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016159416,0.000023236369,0.030069511,0.0002671831,0.00000624173,0.00010067115,0.010358879,5.9584288e-8,0.00005146332,0.8504921,0.00032542355,0.108303614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019214666,0.00005440758,0.77572113,0.00279427,0.00006722965,0.00007426139,0.0055687604,0.000033301505,0.000037407728,0.008953476,0.20581898,0.0006845988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67976826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8816018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8415386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016338369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022194954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99754363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107164622","doi":"10.1080/03057070.2011.579437","title":"‘Our Struggle is for the Full Loaf’: Protests, Social Welfare and Gendered Citizenship in South Africa","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Southern African Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Welfare; Gender studies; Social citizenship; Sociology; Political science; Social Welfare; Political economy; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.1463034505101509,"score_gpt":0.3395637428216498,"score_spread":0.1932602923114989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107164622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7629081,0.08853861,0.0009527053,0.074489504,0.0029732194,0.0063615288,0.0015222314,0.00029560248,0.06195847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99729556,0.00006317484,0.0011015765,0.00007966716,0.0007404069,0.00004903979,1.7924019e-7,0.000031524134,0.00063886587],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976283,0.00027788486,0.00062227255,0.00024384918,0.00063769554,0.00059001794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981332,0.00028355446,0.00071561924,0.00015983412,0.0005695464,0.00013827124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001773426,0.00023799979,0.00055379263,0.00015985689,0.0011494629,0.000092193186,0.00056254683,0.00012641355,0.00005504807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010165039,0.00015834304,0.00021619863,0.00044367855,0.0006616335,0.00011323826,0.00014743183,0.00038254593,0.000011914602],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025144525,0.000044270542,0.004053621,0.000030164058,0.00031823662,0.000015872478,0.9910391,4.4199118e-7,0.000013694196,0.0016429143,0.0014674753,0.0011227423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083360664,0.00020194001,0.0014025017,0.00003272367,0.0001499074,0.0000031424356,0.95886016,0.0000033207243,0.0000151282175,0.008685735,0.02959105,0.0002208022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009526051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021013037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23438744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016559512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014790847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88408554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110027607","doi":"10.7202/039839ar","title":"Penalty Clauses through the Lens of Unconscionability Doctrine: Birch v. Union of Taxation Employees, Local 70030","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Doctrine; Appeal; Law; Political science; Legal doctrine; Law and economics; Economics; Business","score_opus":0.030636016975081126,"score_gpt":0.32612853735531183,"score_spread":0.2954925203802307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110027607","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55516124,0.00045266747,0.0017276817,0.008208962,0.0036323369,0.0007285962,0.00016083619,0.00009765567,0.42983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99834466,0.000062354244,0.0010831199,0.000070744805,0.0003272985,0.0000031573695,0.0000016250011,0.000010514529,0.000096506796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975018,0.0006381384,0.0005448852,0.00016775088,0.00084032904,0.00030708383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977584,0.00042189047,0.0007276451,0.0003255014,0.0006700949,0.00009647474],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024022777,0.00011842028,0.00024394873,0.000039607083,0.0020749324,0.000038217884,0.00056886696,0.00015599196,0.00046611388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010983432,0.000079609454,0.00014719153,0.00041428616,0.0019243342,0.00052362453,0.00008564144,0.0007045065,0.0000136087965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050422845,0.00022801974,0.011608259,0.000023749808,0.000043781707,0.0000036289878,0.0132543305,0.000115262505,0.0007189285,0.9704609,0.0004068093,0.003085918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036012934,0.00012634699,0.004536327,0.000028991977,0.00003910152,0.000010520225,0.0023635726,0.000008550235,0.0033423738,0.019246891,0.9698035,0.00013369683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023307959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07331567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9693967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010622792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009816032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110624938","doi":"10.1177/1743872110378707","title":"Legal Judgment and Cape Colonial Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Contradiction; Performative utterance; Law; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Power (physics); Legal realism; Epistemology; Political science; History; Legal profession; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.014802688930022824,"score_gpt":0.2618092153669088,"score_spread":0.247006526436886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110624938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023379339,0.0011751468,4.887793e-7,0.00081563974,0.0005391473,0.00017706376,0.000007847804,0.000053771062,0.97385156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92803895,0.000048534628,0.00005690118,0.0021122051,0.00083197176,0.000016168746,0.0000015479866,0.0000055535024,0.068888135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933,0.000084064624,0.00008662977,0.00012107623,0.00019283433,0.00018542274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997064,0.00006747055,0.0000356012,0.00010443264,0.00004604634,0.000040078157],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028235468,0.00008860104,0.0001220086,0.000005853727,0.0020776314,0.0006363303,0.0001552622,0.00008637533,0.00011366135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000223207,0.000053094875,0.000028788212,0.000027973194,0.0042081997,0.00017376224,0.000068804635,0.00024411334,0.000012989781],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013890448,0.000006020561,0.000010115091,0.0000036081344,0.000009405947,0.000002238144,0.20352937,2.1696316e-8,0.000028505994,0.79615474,0.00020895383,0.000033160984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003642519,0.000020873451,0.000012045957,0.0000042617867,0.000024418709,0.0000021734786,0.007004248,7.107553e-7,0.000054467855,0.03984787,0.95258164,0.00008300998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026645357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21282093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9523727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008412963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017893148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112572389","doi":"10.1177/135822910100500306","title":"Toward Substantive Equality: A Feminist Critique of the Notion of Difference in the Canadian and South African Equality Tests","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Discrimination and the Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normality; Sociology; Hegemony; Jurisprudence; Perspective (graphical); Gender studies; Reading (process); Law; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06608083827679245,"score_gpt":0.3597831751199686,"score_spread":0.29370233684317615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112572389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87238973,0.00027269166,0.00019169501,0.051239572,0.000369133,0.00024010982,0.000059185182,0.0000028107231,0.07523505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992104,0.000047440284,0.000026506634,0.00053583796,0.00007701145,0.000002478897,8.5362296e-7,0.0000026056425,0.000096855554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981581,0.0006531016,0.0003615918,0.000070992515,0.00065294205,0.0001032533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986016,0.00044784238,0.0003900893,0.00008228603,0.00043030633,0.000047857695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021484864,0.00006157479,0.0001403257,0.00006954619,0.00016702448,0.0000964844,0.0005038803,0.000044244025,0.000010442318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079263427,0.00003223344,0.00005885814,0.0001671682,0.0011008726,0.00013527527,0.000041345862,0.0001734407,1.8311066e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060089995,0.00003218627,0.011805996,0.0000049543137,0.000016126998,0.0000026262962,0.29778865,0.0000013658893,0.000015073838,0.68957484,0.000005330151,0.00069272757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026554102,0.00012567129,0.4911989,0.0003876285,0.00012462438,0.000045562938,0.2859923,0.0001750785,0.00025188224,0.20633702,0.012486972,0.00021896571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07394848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3058256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48323783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093343755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001585388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9322182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113683616","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v17i6.04","title":"Arbitration of family separation issues – a useful adjunct to mediation and the court process","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Mediation; Dispute resolution; Compulsory arbitration; Law; Adversarial system; Political science; Alternative dispute resolution; Arbitration clause; Federal Arbitration Act; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.010679055463419719,"score_gpt":0.3214630370797933,"score_spread":0.31078398161637355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113683616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8537935,0.019745648,0.025769765,0.043728832,0.0014900146,0.0040767756,0.00002580286,0.00048500928,0.050884623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943361,0.0013485259,0.0008466114,0.00076677406,0.00185807,0.00015732276,0.00001599554,0.000086628424,0.0005839269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992284,0.0018372915,0.0013201003,0.0007196945,0.0020955012,0.0017434092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957022,0.0008235175,0.001108551,0.0007142332,0.0010744452,0.00057705323],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073657953,0.0005815148,0.0009982685,0.00027393887,0.0018284587,0.0005618498,0.0011185268,0.0003798003,0.000066562825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019820984,0.00044979516,0.00031456214,0.0010820118,0.0013961621,0.0012921924,0.00012150978,0.0014496336,0.00004972238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002022311,0.0002971363,0.0017846327,0.000109456356,0.0006398315,0.0000068944487,0.1280928,0.0018913532,0.0037894647,0.8522077,0.0019862866,0.007172098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011617288,0.002681618,0.0011004903,0.00033270093,0.0009344261,0.00010484787,0.033307534,0.0044038505,0.0106941005,0.1670489,0.7657827,0.0019915048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018971502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005911398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76379645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086837006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010087135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114615455","doi":"10.1177/135822910000400403","title":"Can Law Protect Language? Law, Language and Human Rights in the South African Constitution","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Discrimination and the Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Mandate; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Duty; Law; Population; Political science; Human rights; Public administration; Citizenship; Sociology; Politics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.013517603621007627,"score_gpt":0.31401365460878616,"score_spread":0.30049605098777854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114615455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4458492,0.00033414818,0.000017612801,0.016057234,0.00018982374,0.00026535304,0.000017622318,0.00001245165,0.53725654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984307,0.000006334375,0.00004392471,0.0008226853,0.0002915592,0.0000064382707,0.0000032837524,0.0000026456773,0.0003923785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871594,0.00035191106,0.00022863435,0.000084011255,0.0005102962,0.00010923337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951905,0.0001228205,0.00014400526,0.00007134319,0.00010070154,0.00004205601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010132723,0.00007175489,0.000109529086,0.000046075165,0.0004380832,0.00024611803,0.00034315264,0.000039267095,0.00011633351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004543923,0.000039933704,0.000044130582,0.00007298824,0.0012979024,0.0002562247,0.000021693837,0.00018981115,0.0000031154284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003945612,0.000023190762,0.000034191846,0.0000015361283,0.000014287211,0.000023485209,0.23508394,0.0000025896459,0.000014942437,0.76421154,0.0000132260275,0.0005376503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009041626,0.00023163954,0.0029594467,0.00034184035,0.00020623308,0.00020304733,0.23625292,0.00009882561,0.0005919828,0.2970299,0.4525156,0.0005269261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029143803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041883394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55258155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005405134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020485986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9773212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114923845","doi":"","title":"Die reg op toegang tot inligting in publieke administrasie","year":2009,"lang":"af","type":"dissertation","venue":"Unisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.02306091923866505,"score_gpt":0.24974946154054498,"score_spread":0.22668854230187993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114923845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4409583,0.0023411992,0.00008910973,0.00034879628,0.0019350268,0.0007319162,0.00016647382,0.00015962265,0.55326957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9607829,0.00010578925,0.0015256762,0.000031020325,0.000455117,0.0000023338691,0.00029035538,0.000031942178,0.036774904],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99410343,0.00049558404,0.00092123967,0.0012821633,0.0021510746,0.0010465321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99620646,0.00031960802,0.0014147555,0.000726798,0.00081389584,0.000518467],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009300354,0.00068514695,0.0010426108,0.00066728937,0.0031255395,0.00023355402,0.001967147,0.0012546605,0.0001957465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078101404,0.0009348336,0.00056236755,0.0015200094,0.0020597118,0.0013161148,0.00025317754,0.0013521793,0.00016707579],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011768816,0.0014025153,0.011441025,0.0005607575,0.00038721858,0.0038655035,0.9109359,0.0012449893,0.0008645744,0.06355708,0.0008182876,0.003745314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003382212,0.0006605196,0.06352701,0.0030090162,0.0008024399,0.00003132996,0.5175259,0.0007435463,0.0004732358,0.0013427876,0.40551427,0.0029877066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051767696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001968658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51982456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015023362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039872536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115924852","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2013/v16i1a2319","title":"The Impact on Women on the Removal of Gender as a Rating Variable in Motor-Vehicle Insurance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; Yale University","keywords":"Actuarial science; Disadvantaged; Legislation; Variable (mathematics); Promotion (chess); Economics; Business; Law; Political science; Economic growth; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01805414983900718,"score_gpt":0.3180676394324125,"score_spread":0.30001348959340535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115924852","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83995664,0.003974117,0.000037830778,0.0051930905,0.0005339187,0.0010229171,0.000022489608,0.00009950859,0.14915948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99369854,0.0012620711,0.00013954168,0.00028278818,0.0011520673,0.00016443315,0.0000019022517,0.00012558162,0.003173074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98964465,0.0019538985,0.0013477029,0.0008181997,0.002291435,0.0039441343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922098,0.0023020892,0.0019882994,0.0024241845,0.00049734337,0.0005782979],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010142472,0.0007933805,0.000978365,0.00019197218,0.008302616,0.0016382016,0.004370626,0.0004302564,0.00027329873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046301503,0.00048386172,0.00056783715,0.00068719283,0.0020445627,0.0010616452,0.00033247637,0.003999259,0.00011474681],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029703465,0.00064630975,0.0040703067,0.000028452389,0.00094115606,0.00023167227,0.04038726,0.0021044493,0.0028699618,0.9354811,0.0006896267,0.009579394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010155956,0.007376498,0.011063905,0.00094492827,0.00020451337,0.00049722317,0.051947065,0.0015015942,0.0059747887,0.40813705,0.49916595,0.0030305209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072085066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024181213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52734405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004793642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002590258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120296895","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1061","title":"Remedial Power of Administrative Tribunals","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Tribunal; Charter; Constitution; Political science; Jurisdiction; Statute; Administrative law; Judicial review","score_opus":0.07423987899678985,"score_gpt":0.39523443980314216,"score_spread":0.3209945608063523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120296895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002782215,0.16496891,0.0001306648,0.01829969,0.0011121312,0.0018383864,0.00006906398,0.00016415404,0.8106348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98595417,0.010922914,0.0009247057,0.0013811529,0.00020956449,0.000028434315,0.000006945125,0.000014012004,0.0005580775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790484,0.0002720437,0.0004944649,0.00024339001,0.0007363988,0.00034889212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987789,0.00013074164,0.00021974665,0.00035409164,0.00032589727,0.00019061616],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013645436,0.00014420775,0.0004927929,0.000020478863,0.00018611515,0.000025976296,0.00047835748,0.00009892282,0.001580206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010709516,0.00012618884,0.00019653067,0.00040823375,0.00072592223,0.00022207106,0.00005194854,0.00016604649,0.00027943144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015107057,0.00013156107,0.00012215023,0.00038880762,0.00004272356,0.00002138573,0.019817377,6.652748e-7,0.000054349828,0.9742021,0.00463772,0.0005660784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023626558,0.00009588533,0.000023703224,0.0015476925,0.000059578484,9.408058e-7,0.00030841102,2.8920564e-8,0.00038603286,0.006498746,0.9906893,0.00015346143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077285216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014095594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98605156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001210761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050443487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120716607","doi":"","title":"Employee Rights In Bankruptcy Protection And Bankruptcy & Receivership | Ontario Ministry of Labour","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receivership; Bankruptcy; Business; Christian ministry; Finance; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.027202807990937244,"score_gpt":0.29191503648539535,"score_spread":0.2647122284944581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120716607","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7971414,0.000053491105,0.0000137423285,0.00078200555,0.00011620833,0.00029333183,0.0000021033645,0.000054504475,0.20154321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97196,0.000004474036,0.0008265819,0.00008446149,0.0000868797,0.0000062347776,7.72295e-7,0.0000035216317,0.027027069],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874216,0.00014748253,0.00024355625,0.00025123137,0.00032614465,0.0002894153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952155,0.000050953106,0.00008179465,0.00016444278,0.00007635851,0.000104877436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048010252,0.00010884825,0.00018917768,0.0001010568,0.00017762676,0.00004951579,0.00019036005,0.00017319838,0.0008680518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012662694,0.00009984366,0.000035813187,0.00038490738,0.00019658421,0.00028507336,0.000020702673,0.00022028165,0.000023190994],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022304863,0.00028917476,0.24396652,0.000044733217,0.000025336094,0.000051940675,0.5548406,0.00000620321,0.0007051056,0.19105612,0.0007318856,0.008059289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010145775,0.00042135632,0.46603328,0.00008732407,0.000017815344,0.0000022796598,0.0051585757,0.000004556182,0.0017001721,0.044233564,0.48088402,0.00044249027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27029374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37526834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5496821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023941686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001812621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95045584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121329059","doi":"10.3828/bjcs.19.2.11","title":"Human Rights Codes: Are They Ready for Today's Challenges?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Human rights; Commission; Nova scotia; Equity (law); Political science; Sociology; Law; Work (physics); Engineering","score_opus":0.08018853485791355,"score_gpt":0.3436190799789972,"score_spread":0.26343054512108366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121329059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1450776,0.28990698,0.000007988236,0.015933197,0.0025845077,0.00084350177,0.00042931316,0.000075241915,0.5451417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919578,0.0017327637,0.00045204462,0.00011241316,0.0020214724,0.000011215759,0.0000016172625,0.000015322976,0.0036953813],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839014,0.00013909453,0.00040987798,0.00014874867,0.00040033285,0.0005117871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822086,0.00014971473,0.00033462004,0.0000936608,0.00089748885,0.00030368209],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000947719,0.0001132755,0.00039746446,0.0002742889,0.0017130087,0.0001467423,0.00035179302,0.00009590986,0.000029304456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003583525,0.00012177504,0.0001283103,0.00017135369,0.0003316703,0.00023925393,0.000017128725,0.00018450123,0.000007653685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020807633,0.0001290995,0.0017284229,0.000102896935,0.00065884215,0.0027769743,0.100872576,0.000024903831,0.000009561541,0.21194412,0.6720224,0.009709359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003507045,0.00006429194,0.003896383,0.00025389504,0.000051079456,0.000046669575,0.01592435,1.037219e-7,0.000006017962,0.028300973,0.9509414,0.00016416743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55651903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9922598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8468802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041895107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002351797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122093054","doi":"","title":"Fixed election dates and the Governor General's power to grant dissolution","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Governor; Power (physics); General election; Political science; Public administration; Internal medicine; Economics; Medicine; Law; Physics; Politics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.02107787189601682,"score_gpt":0.2792371100888111,"score_spread":0.25815923819279424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122093054","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090061754,0.57100874,0.00004763825,0.24382468,0.0018910719,0.0052945903,0.00022859954,0.00014173765,0.08750118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8653392,0.0957115,0.0002847552,0.03139076,0.00036995974,0.00016268817,0.00003678958,0.000021941227,0.0066824104],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986734,0.0002811972,0.00019561544,0.00022110384,0.00024640444,0.00038227538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991372,0.000053248375,0.00005493058,0.00022237074,0.000051982875,0.00048021603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005667154,0.000111594236,0.00021812027,0.000037494123,0.0008443677,0.00004294854,0.00022690436,0.00003866772,0.0005301794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022353148,0.00008234588,0.00005459602,0.00042673838,0.00033197444,0.00016536444,0.000024832283,0.00010362081,0.00017591658],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024831492,0.000019320149,0.008163689,0.00012930705,0.00006879556,0.000049030852,0.02780185,0.0000013822853,0.00002022139,0.010235846,0.93879277,0.014692984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014812032,0.00001771611,0.0010333034,0.00016498749,0.00003583437,0.000005782738,0.00026826735,0.000003439711,0.0000041939898,0.00008167871,0.9981162,0.00012046082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5803002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5286889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77527744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004729217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030879682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64942795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123220012","doi":"10.1177/0964663913502509","title":"Criminal Justice and Cape Law’s Persons","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Prince Albert Grand Council","funders":"","keywords":"Expansive; Politics; Criminal law; Jurisdiction; Criminal justice; Law; Personhood; Criminology; Political science; Economic Justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.0639379628286415,"score_gpt":0.3747237199031805,"score_spread":0.310785757074539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123220012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20521708,0.010090068,0.0000066670773,0.011750604,0.0010918082,0.00044723696,0.0000114564555,0.000250154,0.7711349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98823845,0.00017450494,0.00026113942,0.0009699438,0.001731917,0.000059404207,6.7965914e-7,0.00001441736,0.0085495645],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984648,0.00017210741,0.00016365288,0.0002626531,0.00042513898,0.0005116423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928546,0.00020604212,0.000066949455,0.00007909284,0.00023795037,0.00012449239],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029283937,0.00015588444,0.00026641853,0.000027333797,0.00313743,0.0002347979,0.00019641004,0.000107606174,0.0001548042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045809214,0.00014479476,0.00007447523,0.00018805917,0.0019558645,0.00037750008,0.00016628465,0.00021760467,0.00021371302],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004613413,0.000021799542,0.00022343405,0.00004811093,0.00007127088,0.000007185334,0.62091833,8.771947e-8,0.000020219552,0.3608928,0.015860585,0.001931557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016945566,0.00003583309,0.0011267914,0.000009725255,0.00032335927,5.1142297e-7,0.44868824,0.0000014306424,0.000008581235,0.0032734002,0.54613763,0.00022502738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02456409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007301973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78302133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001453416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000068607296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99816036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123802935","doi":"10.1163/156920905774270457","title":"Cultural Perceptions of Africans in Diaspora and in Africa on Atlantic Slave Trade and Reparations","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African and Asian Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Diaspora; Corporation; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); African studies; Political science; Middle Passage; Perception; Sociology; Law; Gender studies; Psychology","score_opus":0.04019569952181833,"score_gpt":0.3425869583322969,"score_spread":0.30239125881047857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123802935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93930674,0.0037746532,0.0000013040002,0.008038485,0.000028303264,0.00022302594,0.000013109657,0.000023062907,0.048591312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973941,0.0018325315,0.00034253325,0.0000363711,0.00006725492,0.000024381323,9.124044e-7,0.000005628692,0.00029629542],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895835,0.00012526584,0.00023841066,0.0002476398,0.00016513972,0.00026522155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955696,0.00018029328,0.000063982356,0.00009100361,0.000023168717,0.00008461946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024106691,0.00012207293,0.0002922447,0.0001477719,0.000230321,0.000031408075,0.00006838208,0.00005106165,0.000008529286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020264833,0.000102096405,0.0000240742,0.00042835623,0.0009527688,0.00016832913,0.000048815044,0.00012549294,0.0000021008336],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017077553,0.00007197125,0.05261871,0.00001168598,0.0000199449,0.0000058466267,0.9385271,0.0000037038471,0.00003938529,0.005481347,0.000499721,0.0027034953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043794673,0.00010932704,0.18155521,0.00007058446,0.000027728185,0.0000014368127,0.79669696,0.000025022193,0.000005670736,0.00083698466,0.020034308,0.00019884754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005876287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00794516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14183018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066934546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024586356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4433586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125101295","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v5n1p9","title":"Social Justice: Reflections on Human Dignity and Equality","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Excuse; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Political science; Health care; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.16411613218495924,"score_gpt":0.4839335848241642,"score_spread":0.31981745263920497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125101295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43895522,0.00030785144,0.000029031014,0.002362515,0.00052911544,0.000042572687,0.000008710648,0.00001013738,0.5577549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961254,0.00001725076,0.000121409124,0.0005767432,0.0023875718,2.6731058e-7,1.729586e-7,0.000003971423,0.00076720153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999163,0.00015419412,0.00017208254,0.000041984,0.00023018505,0.00023855953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940544,0.000111372356,0.00012386152,0.00003713868,0.00009415355,0.0002280164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000794256,0.000049410653,0.00011389433,0.000028699857,0.0011177667,0.0000794783,0.0000602968,0.0000675569,0.000026837057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014119069,0.000042144315,0.000035652334,0.000051865733,0.00040012217,0.00018775772,0.00002271712,0.00020027318,0.0000022473141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024472827,0.00004979952,0.000628858,0.000008096666,0.000009436261,8.62455e-7,0.04278832,4.9566317e-8,0.000032350858,0.9558525,0.00057261524,0.000054675365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022937832,0.00011165134,0.004787901,0.000012440632,0.0001160646,0.000004528965,0.0075421757,3.2678818e-7,0.000052565163,0.066983104,0.9200635,0.00009637939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006812356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016954877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9194909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006704114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036005407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85970706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126769189","doi":"10.1177/1077801212453430","title":"Violence Against Women in South Africa","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Violence Against Women","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Position (finance); Government (linguistics); Poison control; Human rights; Domestic violence; Sexual violence; Human factors and ergonomics; Criminology; Suicide prevention; Political science; Law; Injury prevention; Sociology; Medicine; Medical emergency; Business","score_opus":0.019037978465048882,"score_gpt":0.27713929310534846,"score_spread":0.25810131464029956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126769189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8929826,0.0019689836,0.000024151883,0.000099192606,0.0007565007,0.00050645164,0.000028393673,0.00029756877,0.103336185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954387,0.0010631813,0.00027523187,0.00074125157,0.00077884615,0.00046707713,0.0000051502893,0.000051240695,0.0011793466],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934019,0.00054749724,0.0006166854,0.00065736787,0.0010774157,0.003699147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974208,0.00023913702,0.0002546876,0.00072742003,0.00011867307,0.0012393175],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037214097,0.0004060679,0.0005483835,0.00034773728,0.0005448418,0.00016341626,0.0013510634,0.00031458784,0.0003439232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009758919,0.0004059614,0.00010238795,0.0017326415,0.00075956574,0.0011148831,0.00033084024,0.00056657265,0.0015404965],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041912474,0.00023947771,0.06763315,0.000026095788,0.000020439868,0.000025079842,0.89428306,0.000050168772,0.00024233219,0.0016283408,0.0000884555,0.035721503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018575282,0.00022275346,0.015584199,0.0016774475,0.000015743888,8.3236927e-7,0.49756718,0.00013924087,0.00033470843,0.008964494,0.47123194,0.002403941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014774516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024995139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47114348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023515532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040847025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127725437","doi":"10.1002/iir.1233","title":"Perspectives on the South African Responsible Lending Regime and the Duty to Conduct Pre‐agreement Assessment as a Responsible Lending Practice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exposition (narrative); Debt; Duty; Economics; Business; Political science; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.12399551837239799,"score_gpt":0.45362418167625207,"score_spread":0.3296286633038541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127725437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060120123,0.044393696,0.00013189798,0.3607325,0.0009908056,0.0022179452,0.000024093184,0.00007855916,0.58541846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.966052,0.012356191,0.0030070834,0.006093746,0.0005226376,0.00038371625,0.000002945588,0.000025048215,0.011556607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99461335,0.0024538971,0.0004761272,0.0005078771,0.0015903445,0.0003584344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954947,0.0026871134,0.0004003171,0.0005251969,0.0006734426,0.0002192196],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011226878,0.00021711577,0.00033818113,0.00013963095,0.00063139916,0.00037079578,0.0010217194,0.000057930374,0.00046597532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024084782,0.00013203749,0.00013163568,0.00064793095,0.0005090023,0.00056049414,0.00034030812,0.00044003112,0.0002673747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003875891,0.00008193529,0.00011290647,0.000027329157,0.00011543086,0.000014915773,0.17236309,0.0000062914605,0.000016934817,0.8166809,0.009300759,0.0008919192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042068303,0.00015955338,0.00012572393,0.0011240258,0.000086139655,0.000009974555,0.074725114,0.000015570438,0.000016880133,0.005551136,0.91757715,0.00018807162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001054939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009280253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96004003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008170048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000987729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98413575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130290708","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2002.tb01160.x","title":"Designing a merit‐based process for appointing boards of abcs: Lessons from the Nova Scotia reform experience","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; Political science; Veto; Nova scotia; Public administration; Humanities; Politics; Law; Sociology; Ethnology; Art","score_opus":0.11515505098058823,"score_gpt":0.36579358106839904,"score_spread":0.2506385300878108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130290708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5427025,0.0011142632,0.027663471,0.26907268,0.0022422757,0.0040387474,0.00092789653,0.00034724572,0.15189089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99652416,0.000001228121,0.002382325,0.00045744944,0.00030106286,0.00006690869,0.00003746478,0.000014834847,0.00021455353],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985162,0.00009117964,0.00030040235,0.00026581853,0.00035377822,0.00047259018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868625,0.00020236593,0.00020566145,0.00025666723,0.00030613993,0.00034291763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005988006,0.00011443677,0.00014405228,0.00008051068,0.00069304265,0.00026536896,0.0005275779,0.00012639334,0.0005538651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014679229,0.00010230496,0.000059243157,0.000529167,0.00040226994,0.0005273091,0.000008669408,0.000114925395,0.000013122613],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061187326,0.00023823562,0.023479719,0.00013707894,0.00010457378,0.000027553542,0.6936181,0.000016006856,0.0012920412,0.24720629,0.010749259,0.023069931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010897246,0.00031880874,0.0009832702,0.00020660702,0.000083414554,0.0000022962383,0.23191462,0.00572547,0.012107906,0.002208711,0.74436045,0.0009987272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.064503625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6888892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73361117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003992329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021038887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9417259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131814071","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2009/v12i4a2747","title":"The Constitutional Validity of Search and Seizure Powers in South African Criminal Procedure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Search and seizure; Constitution; Criminal procedure; Law; Democracy; Law enforcement; State (computer science); Political science; Enforcement; Business; Supreme court; Politics","score_opus":0.030630525159094132,"score_gpt":0.32502375730937255,"score_spread":0.2943932321502784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131814071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9045983,0.01573516,0.0006707707,0.013064381,0.001095256,0.0016962442,0.00007343821,0.00018233483,0.06288412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958754,0.0017282349,0.00036277753,0.00006783577,0.00086519675,0.000050368053,0.0000050974872,0.000059420192,0.000985668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991941,0.0011173204,0.0011563632,0.00081519026,0.0020332048,0.0029369695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995603,0.0006771725,0.0010675762,0.0012247049,0.00071081164,0.0007167114],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065688826,0.00060859864,0.00087072427,0.0002276769,0.007649873,0.001323738,0.0026144388,0.0004545011,0.000086197906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024526326,0.0004895623,0.00037131825,0.00043208044,0.01068799,0.0012621714,0.000466215,0.003125492,0.000019324658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089585583,0.00029372072,0.024921075,0.00010253901,0.00045286512,0.00014549201,0.07881788,0.00022572489,0.00035012187,0.88954103,0.0002865651,0.003967157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012832004,0.0031702598,0.01686675,0.0010007804,0.0011802256,0.0009230521,0.240387,0.0007657147,0.003997744,0.088108905,0.62692326,0.0038443175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002699595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015331089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8014321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017069982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004130241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132792422","doi":"10.1007/s12132-010-9078-5","title":"Including Women? (Dis)junctures Between Voice, Policy and Implementation in Integrated Development Planning","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Urban Forum","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Transformative learning; Agency (philosophy); Democracy; Citizen journalism; Space (punctuation); Corporate governance; Public administration; Political science; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Human geography; Perspective (graphical); Economic growth; Public relations; Management; Politics; Pedagogy; Economics; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.023278808015207392,"score_gpt":0.3646012295160244,"score_spread":0.34132242150081704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132792422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98421556,0.000081465216,0.000047431342,0.0008019907,0.00019485256,0.0002287977,0.000009811299,0.000069784044,0.014350324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99687326,0.0000013416686,0.0013773695,0.00019291104,0.00029747453,0.000025568317,0.000019028352,0.000012335882,0.0012007167],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986594,0.00006362816,0.00024445308,0.00020641257,0.00025777117,0.00056838995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995237,0.00011389515,0.00008439037,0.00009274251,0.000036422975,0.0001488319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006594695,0.000119412165,0.00014917884,0.00024484366,0.00041473174,0.0001211985,0.00019649416,0.00010813632,0.000110349174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031065056,0.0001094287,0.000014468776,0.0004764377,0.00013318572,0.0002501248,0.00013049303,0.0002740825,0.000023487499],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051731977,0.000007132792,0.701696,0.000004509138,0.000009856389,0.0000020899272,0.28608456,9.0678077e-7,0.00015705578,0.0051671052,0.00065321836,0.0062124263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003429353,0.0000206925,0.10852099,0.000015230235,0.000003022339,1.1447835e-7,0.044555973,0.000004678231,0.00047758236,0.0015161033,0.84436303,0.00017961758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00365618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007077062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8437098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033390717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031058316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5527075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133502498","doi":"10.12735/jfe.v2i1p28","title":"The Constitutionality of Prescription Periods in the South African Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Finance & Economics","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Medical prescription; Law; Political science; Medicine; Constitution; Nursing","score_opus":0.020800130981242393,"score_gpt":0.276397518324489,"score_spread":0.2555973873432466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133502498","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89363396,0.0005247859,0.00017920548,0.0036495088,0.0007615501,0.00012185683,0.0000096413105,0.0000030801177,0.101116434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99890935,0.00017081732,0.00034044439,0.00016646723,0.00031661097,0.0000021617418,1.5002412e-7,0.0000025539766,0.000091457754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989633,0.0002455663,0.0004300312,0.000067902365,0.0001377989,0.00015538528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988718,0.0002751824,0.00056113955,0.00016108036,0.000104874205,0.00002593935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032111388,0.000053599084,0.00015944113,0.000022652332,0.00031193474,0.000082426835,0.00053430436,0.00004973898,0.000006957079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043522942,0.00003497607,0.00008730674,0.00009045545,0.0010119032,0.00024634754,0.000021813947,0.00019400773,0.0000039184533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029095254,0.00002243717,0.0065385792,0.0000020751725,0.0000055022106,5.813755e-7,0.04458186,0.00057012634,0.0000029244006,0.9470653,0.0001561497,0.0010253801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022689406,0.000054345066,0.012720646,0.000016906426,0.000009423057,0.0000025961574,0.006268753,0.00010648328,0.000018138637,0.022660494,0.95785594,0.00005939671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039646972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016120335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9576998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011927673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023849591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37283996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135712619","doi":"10.12927/hcq.2009.20750","title":"Questions &amp; Answers: Words from the Street: Delivering on a Provincial Mandate at the Local Level","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Healthcare Quarterly","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Grand River Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Best practice; Public administration; Public relations; Business; Medical education; Medicine; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04675419127981048,"score_gpt":0.3435208586272263,"score_spread":0.29676666734741586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135712619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79973453,0.0021688747,0.0033597597,0.18035145,0.001615096,0.0016351759,0.00066018756,0.00043790994,0.01003699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99401104,0.00002365314,0.00025481867,0.0035145706,0.0012539253,0.00003206896,0.000027017417,0.000014789065,0.0008681001],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973696,0.00067709404,0.00029425617,0.000374703,0.0006938757,0.00059050776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861056,0.0003684975,0.00011760121,0.0005697821,0.0001221517,0.00021142665],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006236921,0.00018254617,0.00017535697,0.000031537737,0.001954886,0.00016908931,0.00060810224,0.00015824397,0.0001381278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009703989,0.000117185635,0.000095359996,0.0002972156,0.00043445267,0.00017680944,0.000025200517,0.0004537538,0.00040707545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013619378,0.00007762946,0.0033682561,0.000007351069,0.000016499409,0.000018392811,0.52938324,0.00002047579,0.000011224236,0.021961585,0.0051069628,0.4398922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055033906,0.0011471539,0.057877395,0.000214165,0.000041374653,0.0000017360259,0.057809506,0.00007011325,0.000010865261,0.007793861,0.87398845,0.00049503625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12586722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52584374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86888146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005281166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000413693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137187785","doi":"10.1093/icon/mon004","title":"The role of dignity in equality law: Lessons from Canada and South Africa","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Temptation; Underpinning; Value (mathematics); Law; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03387566459346647,"score_gpt":0.31228142075917004,"score_spread":0.27840575616570357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137187785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.492461,0.0058620996,0.00046990052,0.009468263,0.002709967,0.00018947625,0.0012376859,0.000014351526,0.48758724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999177,0.00005446671,0.00025702905,0.00014476485,0.00027669108,0.0000012475119,0.0000024713552,0.0000020194009,0.00008434848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981,0.00017310663,0.00042676931,0.00008749398,0.0010701735,0.00014246315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998239,0.0007016076,0.00031034782,0.000067748035,0.0005811198,0.00010021361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005949508,0.00006865596,0.00014859537,0.0000332776,0.00034046939,0.000034830413,0.0004718558,0.000047227197,0.000047320158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004626408,0.000053392738,0.00005533978,0.000074974116,0.002709794,0.00024101754,0.00006528252,0.0002077385,0.0000017355326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005601659,0.000025460164,0.013596528,4.2108698e-7,0.000055251767,0.00004047619,0.007974881,0.00004134388,0.000040506,0.97795147,0.000076476106,0.00014116104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005570309,0.000015434756,0.0063277427,0.000051732335,0.000014482755,0.000022284372,0.0024196403,0.000012826377,0.00044120985,0.11574928,0.87427276,0.000115562616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5867233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5907389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8741963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003265801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002089305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99843496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138402929","doi":"10.1111/plar.12055","title":"Documenting “Community” in the ≠khomani San Land Claim in South Africa","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PoLAR Political and Legal Anthropology Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Term (time); Politics; Government (linguistics); Political science; Desert (philosophy); Tracking (education); Sociology; Geography; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.03980802614158203,"score_gpt":0.36173453990225246,"score_spread":0.32192651376067044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138402929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07735382,0.16545859,0.00007003536,0.12053734,0.0005332548,0.0012107017,0.000036947342,0.00012606195,0.63467324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99283695,0.0016367828,0.0000752736,0.0048767077,0.0002367588,0.000022417771,0.000004415088,0.000009640672,0.00030102773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942245,0.003985509,0.00041223565,0.00022555879,0.0002447192,0.00090747036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986245,0.00079432287,0.00006918332,0.0003054819,0.000030621497,0.00017589422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034412679,0.00016653351,0.0004569886,0.00007386449,0.00068505993,0.000088948866,0.0005092307,0.00014427633,0.00037770002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014005639,0.000113049486,0.00007424329,0.0003957207,0.0023145785,0.00017670644,0.0001529639,0.00091110973,0.00008366304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031174484,0.00009821307,0.032746248,0.00026407425,0.00000604253,0.000014866211,0.038870417,2.8111115e-8,9.882936e-7,0.9268406,0.00023821571,0.00091719633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002512986,0.00008282673,0.005457329,0.00044120415,0.000037968184,0.000009375342,0.01057591,0.000005828073,0.0000011432013,0.00983892,0.9731044,0.00019379352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02739595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069650337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9728662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057103454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059851798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9790807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140264524","doi":"","title":"The Beneficiary’s Bank and Beneficiary Described by Name and Number: Liability Chain and Liability Standard in Wire Transfers (Part 1)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Liability; Art; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009834545048129027,"score_gpt":0.2640484558326957,"score_spread":0.2542139107845667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140264524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97406924,0.0029575925,0.00008563047,0.009477855,0.00014886471,0.0007405689,0.00011574903,0.000103186954,0.0123013025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976214,0.0013940672,0.000400233,0.00018069847,0.0000624595,0.000031204232,0.00000373211,0.000016603675,0.00028956553],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747413,0.00036121716,0.00042971395,0.00062068854,0.00050417264,0.00061006186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986602,0.0005936924,0.000051266503,0.00032068355,0.00008719208,0.00028695865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028815349,0.00024141624,0.00036032175,0.00002930179,0.0008908159,0.00026763693,0.00024498018,0.00023094358,0.00008926713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000544931,0.00018731951,0.000047979207,0.00031175138,0.0016362116,0.00037945487,0.000096939504,0.0003268112,0.0000038309704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005411444,0.0003826099,0.485603,0.00011494326,0.00006329819,0.000016931033,0.2731481,0.000051056406,0.00013037276,0.14723995,0.00072182604,0.09198676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0069442433,0.0009901201,0.0742634,0.00028305003,0.00016661045,0.000010722035,0.0901442,0.00042316713,0.0007721989,0.20614271,0.61732733,0.002532262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010942533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034309387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61660546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027940096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018380705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141250364","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v3n1p38","title":"Harassment in the Workplace: Context as Indicator","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Race (biology); Context (archaeology); Political science; Politics; Racism; Sociology; Criminology; Law; Gender studies; History","score_opus":0.07790474503234336,"score_gpt":0.473657742509328,"score_spread":0.39575299747698467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141250364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04507007,0.00009084479,0.000024494173,0.037514724,0.00034521316,0.00024726946,0.000003408564,0.000019852254,0.91668415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984271,0.000013181894,0.00007964175,0.0011064057,0.0006031788,0.00008469998,0.0000031821428,0.0000062756367,0.013832433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99618375,0.0010990265,0.00015275978,0.00019303928,0.0020212089,0.0003502392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979637,0.0015516714,0.000031445783,0.00019531357,0.0001779461,0.00007991575],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006263018,0.000053762793,0.00006837785,0.000116211246,0.00035740662,0.00029130914,0.001387081,0.00007068393,0.001617409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001318977,0.000040287665,0.000033594693,0.00025348837,0.0006693541,0.00014777998,0.00013520586,0.00047770317,0.002669242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018304276,0.00006093372,0.004629051,9.829278e-7,0.000007065532,0.000008308308,0.02428874,0.0000014453464,0.000009622969,0.9631751,0.005082719,0.0027177064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018509317,0.000024798508,0.0012218964,0.000014116211,6.2173655e-7,4.3722596e-7,0.0043575955,0.000035534304,0.00004600447,0.031106105,0.96296066,0.00004712619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013225898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008334372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95787793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002973302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016549753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142806756","doi":"","title":"Disability Equality Rights in South Africa: Concepts, Interpretation and the Transformation Imperative","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Dignity; Political science; Redress; Law and economics; Disability studies; Transformative learning; Scholarship; International human rights law; Medical model of disability; Sociology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.011359584954886539,"score_gpt":0.3152093886211726,"score_spread":0.30384980366628606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142806756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9392086,0.0038363354,0.008139476,0.008295595,0.00020162002,0.00074881647,0.0000048036463,0.00005251203,0.039512202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994783,0.00014836552,0.000027051894,0.00006313884,0.00013197817,0.0000058039527,0.0000010375798,0.000002424539,0.00014192438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971207,0.0011014241,0.0003315036,0.0001400024,0.0003289085,0.0009775092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946046,0.0001923841,0.0001259094,0.000091216505,0.000067772846,0.00006226983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005636219,0.00009983442,0.000173506,0.00003105705,0.00059123035,0.00013463487,0.00021196743,0.00007563609,0.000018537325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000254147,0.000064006126,0.0000675755,0.00024347755,0.00066971866,0.0005870793,0.000008277975,0.0010767316,0.0000055564556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114002105,0.000020484456,0.00032645688,6.496426e-7,0.000008174003,1.3652823e-7,0.45498058,0.000006805772,0.0000026286716,0.5409768,0.0000011472961,0.0035621182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015378251,0.00014046622,0.0016790754,0.000014054916,0.000022211,0.0000033620174,0.0885253,0.00032108827,0.000013838127,0.90513957,0.002470017,0.00013321507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057117356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072367056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3664553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010166995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046851864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4677923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145217611","doi":"","title":"Conscientious Objection to Creating Same-Sex Unions: An International Analysis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Context (archaeology); Accommodation; Law; Political science; Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.02207339460264576,"score_gpt":0.3313607941634519,"score_spread":0.30928739956080614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145217611","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47682625,0.00022893137,0.0020676116,0.00084103696,0.0025153202,0.00034097306,0.000042232237,0.00035117383,0.51678646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808577,0.00000815195,0.0049705054,0.00086394214,0.0013720192,0.000030945055,0.000028134107,0.000013267068,0.011855364],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787503,0.00032138385,0.00026841488,0.00032256628,0.00070506183,0.0005075342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859744,0.00013351266,0.00010910791,0.0003539993,0.00019629962,0.00060965365],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014514669,0.00012448736,0.00018989155,0.00023512924,0.000909922,0.00038762737,0.0005113105,0.00011024612,0.0024651687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009941728,0.00013052877,0.00012665821,0.0014293771,0.000225686,0.001305273,0.000105039064,0.00019320169,0.00074868504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024814406,0.00034549268,0.4969877,0.0000049612145,0.0004065976,0.000005045224,0.13838296,0.0005539274,0.00055141834,0.35863748,0.0014132743,0.0026863269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026007547,0.00005125626,0.020851528,0.000016554171,0.00022237546,0.0000011323349,0.014615743,0.00017512508,0.0003562657,0.0011786894,0.9618761,0.00039516264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021924812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014661557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9604628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034085137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008213941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W214726199","doi":"","title":"Coverage of Issues Related to Language, in Particular Language Rights and Language Policy, in the South African Print media/Mediadekking in Die Suid-Afrikaanse Gedrukte Media Oor Taalverwante Onderwerpe, in Besonder Taalregte En Taalbeleidskwessies","year":2006,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Literator","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Theology; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0061135216869519955,"score_gpt":0.2863898865395676,"score_spread":0.2802763648526156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W214726199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97549546,0.017503595,0.0000053376643,0.0017599736,0.00029456455,0.0012792556,0.00035992527,0.00006664653,0.0032352689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976781,0.00009015589,0.00033236216,0.0002778531,0.00055740844,0.00013436793,0.00007798388,0.00007050294,0.0007812878],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99207336,0.0023082085,0.0017164545,0.001042674,0.0013145034,0.0015448319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968279,0.0016299569,0.00040478312,0.0007897226,0.00007877665,0.00026886386],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029766373,0.0006924841,0.0012017573,0.0012830381,0.00015814489,0.00038301118,0.0010165524,0.0005887145,0.00009941941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016831148,0.0005647667,0.0001589315,0.0036871072,0.000689792,0.00057725556,0.0003704638,0.0011688727,0.00004151541],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010432125,0.0003781162,0.076245606,0.00011277463,0.000022683333,0.0020241954,0.91681457,0.0001129559,0.0013091017,0.0023000247,0.0000683101,0.00050735736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0077447877,0.00028850482,0.35022917,0.0030040245,0.00013531953,0.000015234536,0.60339856,0.00062288786,0.0066207685,0.0061741937,0.019199511,0.002567029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.113865234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15454212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.313416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052127463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026467163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147471715","doi":"","title":"Anti-Spam: A Comparative Appraisal of Canadian, European Union, and South African Regulatory Regimes","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European union; Cyberspace; Legislature; Business; Political science; International trade; Internet privacy; Public administration; The Internet; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.027755550380962713,"score_gpt":0.28485904287192165,"score_spread":0.25710349249095893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147471715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8267578,0.0055423924,0.00023942562,0.0013493043,0.0002225315,0.00015785318,0.000008807109,0.000043441712,0.16567846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953833,0.0011736262,0.00011862394,0.000031461786,0.00036389884,9.763526e-7,0.0000015352576,0.000019006884,0.0029075723],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963655,0.0009647225,0.0002934084,0.00021399827,0.00043583143,0.0017265308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989116,0.0000873869,0.00025479237,0.00017882668,0.00019636884,0.0003709769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030594508,0.000147769,0.00029134075,0.0003852614,0.00093550794,0.000041366016,0.0004027629,0.00006968179,0.00003071174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020061005,0.00013960677,0.00007317581,0.00073991256,0.0009777208,0.00022367974,0.00004038276,0.0009862342,0.000022417373],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003155705,0.00006264241,0.06623446,0.000006357557,0.000248833,0.00006276345,0.5341715,0.00003819009,0.00009261269,0.39442247,0.0032987862,0.0013298098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015137412,0.00054569327,0.060045313,0.000060950544,0.00011288005,0.00039149632,0.23565404,0.000026568287,0.000119071665,0.021739027,0.6789573,0.0008339502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04596702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12776393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67565846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005023251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048595606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.960386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147639589","doi":"","title":"What is law and development","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Variety (cybernetics); Legislation; Law and economics; Political science; Value (mathematics); Dominance (genetics); Enforcement; Law and development; Field (mathematics); Law; Sociology; Development studies","score_opus":0.02689319132734295,"score_gpt":0.36665095635174516,"score_spread":0.3397577650244022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147639589","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2938462,0.0007918189,0.000020954556,0.010296058,0.0015196402,0.0001401701,2.957099e-7,0.00011556128,0.6932693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704693,0.00004093926,0.005101465,0.0012084454,0.00015441635,0.000004294891,2.5005474e-7,0.0000052566506,0.023015607],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947137,0.000020100162,0.000048367354,0.00011427033,0.00017777308,0.00016814288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970704,0.00003829672,0.00001894849,0.000103011815,0.00002969269,0.000103024744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023907673,0.00004548166,0.00005328187,0.000010811788,0.00029908298,0.00019315122,0.00011466767,0.000062047206,0.00074799755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034839875,0.000042500025,0.000007995044,0.00006114478,0.0002592746,0.0002314072,0.000048992282,0.00010923843,0.0003083007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013964975,0.000008078756,0.00047675337,0.0000023347143,0.00000369374,0.0000020611387,0.92644286,2.0106542e-8,0.00021538376,0.065902784,0.0013550902,0.0055895275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047612706,0.0000027788776,0.00011970068,0.0000038316953,0.0000013742762,1.7744023e-7,0.02116215,5.5133427e-7,0.0014504562,0.0004362589,0.9767104,0.000064715736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011207903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032495284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9753553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000148245035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061447536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81900483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152101107","doi":"10.25071/1920-7336.21246","title":"Migration, Refugees, and Racism in South Africa","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Refuge Canada s Journal on Refuge","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Xenophobia; Refugee; Racism; Democracy; Political science; Civil society; Public policy; Criminology; Development economics; Value (mathematics); Political economy; Sociology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.015696091242721116,"score_gpt":0.2799128903618702,"score_spread":0.2642167991191491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152101107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98851866,0.0037410047,0.000016116808,0.0019590186,0.00072727073,0.00019757701,0.000017091326,0.000040338688,0.004782944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905481,0.00028863733,0.00024801964,0.0011708401,0.00061345246,0.000008477938,0.0000026871367,0.000029217152,0.007090603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966545,0.00043364055,0.00056748005,0.00035878894,0.0011740578,0.00081153784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984414,0.00014208863,0.00028576827,0.00028855028,0.0001771754,0.0006650023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011065473,0.0002445344,0.00034981873,0.00026391045,0.0007235312,0.00022686688,0.00043634177,0.00018044554,0.00039133788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070251606,0.00021831848,0.000066583285,0.0007888449,0.00019156255,0.00033684424,0.000049702932,0.0007973251,0.000024784233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076370436,0.00043159767,0.08032806,0.00005947107,0.00020424074,0.010254634,0.051037274,0.0003092201,0.00018666111,0.8346578,0.015289965,0.0064773946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004908371,0.00006506511,0.0023024294,0.000068697955,0.0000125086535,0.000035172437,0.00014713743,0.000018831639,0.000012396672,0.000960943,0.9956153,0.00027068958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00705466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16651489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98032534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012153783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014097973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158558054","doi":"10.1017/s0008197300000027","title":"Practice Directions and the Civil Procedure Rules","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Jurisdiction; Statute; Civil procedure; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.010753279426418435,"score_gpt":0.28814126681326285,"score_spread":0.2773879873868444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158558054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0139844995,0.0061248075,0.000010162562,0.0653379,0.00034890953,0.00020170266,0.000005128693,0.00005242449,0.91393447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791611,0.0023268946,0.0001432773,0.002306812,0.001563662,0.000010944,2.7251477e-7,0.000011366198,0.014475712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981614,0.00082052016,0.0001775603,0.00010865481,0.00043897692,0.00029290523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986982,0.00076691195,0.000114591945,0.00017483624,0.00012153213,0.00012395075],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024692991,0.00008986972,0.00011822201,0.000013439015,0.004274584,0.0005360567,0.00040482348,0.000053191943,0.00034021187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006463872,0.000045721223,0.000069120084,0.0001936252,0.0015067182,0.00047053036,0.000034728593,0.0005559547,0.00016483192],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023643853,0.000057143578,0.00007389176,0.000004210895,0.00009539695,0.000028303793,0.118057996,0.000013749357,0.000004020941,0.8342785,0.032952055,0.014198245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036391578,0.000013074975,0.00016614333,0.000013837632,0.000074720374,0.0002532858,0.006440028,0.00001666707,0.0000041834196,0.0025083956,0.99007237,0.00007335408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028723883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015887212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9651766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056698093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009809169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99702173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W21657429","doi":"","title":"A Promising Late Spring for Charter Damages: \"Ward v. Vancouver\"","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Jurisdiction; Compensation (psychology); Government (linguistics); Economic Justice; Statute; Psychology","score_opus":0.029380816644021833,"score_gpt":0.28704507100559423,"score_spread":0.2576642543615724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W21657429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6523986,0.006781928,0.07160793,0.0019956836,0.006248202,0.0021501423,0.00000972625,0.0005839534,0.25822383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98689383,0.00035765622,0.0018793338,0.000081769846,0.00091632095,0.000015328658,2.533574e-7,0.000031711377,0.00982382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964393,0.00012407308,0.00025751855,0.00021351172,0.00033161973,0.002634017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931204,0.000055889708,0.00017860161,0.00015912793,0.00014059039,0.00015372572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002890941,0.00013823558,0.00018047093,0.00008963851,0.0008088989,0.00010447128,0.0004858922,0.000105859355,0.000101541926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023018397,0.00012743301,0.00014890402,0.00017892433,0.00013419538,0.0004856051,0.000038098748,0.0011474345,0.000050274226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003089992,0.00021436329,0.0086745,0.00003057099,0.00042946948,0.000023328064,0.35814655,0.000007708133,0.00049160793,0.5875332,0.0011278238,0.043011926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015101342,0.0005073442,0.00039285992,0.00007833333,0.0001180699,0.0000136755425,0.030721886,0.00007823089,0.00037831743,0.57495266,0.39065263,0.0005958396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082044496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0111845555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38952482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009258591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018789318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6241244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168351882","doi":"","title":"From Equality Before the Law to the Equal Benefit of the Law: Social and Economic Rights in the Irish Constitution","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Irish; Social rights; Doctrine; Law; Political science; International human rights law; Human rights; Fundamental rights; Constitution; Convention; Social equality; Right to property","score_opus":0.02478059605225247,"score_gpt":0.3063622042283671,"score_spread":0.2815816081761146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168351882","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93550867,0.00090912345,0.00007552282,0.022095853,0.00042454232,0.0003739738,0.000030277935,0.000010739163,0.040571295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977784,0.00006887981,0.0000073950305,0.0006689377,0.0012495436,0.000007951341,9.514915e-7,0.0000044490844,0.00021348192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997403,0.000731854,0.00031966693,0.00016001565,0.00042795658,0.000957506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992392,0.00023761265,0.00020721246,0.00022573309,0.00004817092,0.000042068245],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037275397,0.00011524137,0.00016625444,0.000016684115,0.0030566333,0.00011162148,0.0010358501,0.00009882523,0.000029195953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006421251,0.000051011306,0.00011434674,0.00016471352,0.0016756088,0.0001993075,0.000095067146,0.0012186877,0.000015990743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001559128,0.000015222156,0.0012217604,3.858747e-7,0.00002841748,5.9039775e-7,0.12204539,0.000021796352,0.0000026491361,0.87621105,0.00020646678,0.00023069375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041000792,0.00007310141,0.0039895508,0.000010937886,0.000045257813,0.000025025836,0.0307577,0.000012881671,0.00002783047,0.8012987,0.16323023,0.000118824704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0802579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46678284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38652495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006950917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097257755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99824125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169175884","doi":"","title":"The child's right against exploitation in the form of pornography on the Internet : a South African perspective","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Pornography; Child pornography; The Internet; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Advertising; Art; Law; Computer science; Business; World Wide Web; Visual arts","score_opus":0.01411834257981732,"score_gpt":0.25230835737505614,"score_spread":0.23819001479523882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169175884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16679487,0.00069034763,0.00000705034,0.001639071,0.00048259005,0.0010416721,0.000029020552,0.000046949026,0.82926846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970678,0.00079668954,0.000016274667,0.00011151154,0.000161035,0.000009282713,0.000049352344,0.000029331468,0.028148536],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996269,0.0013422075,0.00032177372,0.00048338433,0.0010676858,0.0005159326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973147,0.00096477644,0.0005306087,0.00064777315,0.00045092084,0.000091251626],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016491908,0.0003312958,0.00031092926,0.00063843164,0.0016935855,0.00026072806,0.0022862519,0.00033959764,0.00011528067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072318927,0.0002040057,0.00038217774,0.0026863138,0.0006066169,0.00046294628,0.0000683786,0.0014807171,0.000041273364],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002741782,0.00010677792,0.0003939987,0.0000108442355,0.00010658991,0.000035660658,0.72731584,0.000004765874,0.000001737176,0.27066812,0.0005539096,0.0005275655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000245948,0.000078233614,0.00062643905,0.000111998095,0.00006260681,2.1010896e-7,0.6148466,0.0000032768116,0.000025588637,0.0022196497,0.3815915,0.00018798478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019385003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012280012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80388314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045832407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027408934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178913227","doi":"","title":"A guide to the Personal Property Security Act: The case of Malawi","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Personal property; Statutory law; Security interest; Law reform; Statute; Law; Legislature; Common law; Legislative history; Insolvency; Commission; Business; Political science; Property (philosophy)","score_opus":0.022917426676099244,"score_gpt":0.32659740174318375,"score_spread":0.3036799750670845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178913227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6051848,0.012587255,0.0010124025,0.104001775,0.0015213466,0.0014203541,0.000019875924,0.000097852535,0.27415434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983794,0.00016083765,0.000058972815,0.00032671707,0.0009781112,0.0000090754165,2.0572394e-7,0.000011885296,0.014660228],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688476,0.00055593846,0.00025508387,0.00014585802,0.00058180414,0.0015765745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990136,0.00008337405,0.00015004275,0.00021633542,0.00032648264,0.00021018542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008159628,0.00011030018,0.00014522087,0.00003717786,0.0008136388,0.00011157027,0.00073307025,0.000066761095,0.00006869845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084830844,0.000048077367,0.00011508484,0.0003882046,0.0003162779,0.00017734872,0.00010376072,0.0013689033,0.00007576915],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012554573,0.00011570524,0.0007967492,0.000004663484,0.00017300875,0.00015606699,0.69253474,0.000027657336,0.000035037152,0.2500209,0.027831865,0.028178057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029057197,0.00023761016,0.000009008738,0.000011129343,0.000041010335,0.0010015746,0.18155287,0.00008059302,0.000026200445,0.036416218,0.78020895,0.00012426049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011095212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047857787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7523771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010158196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053076576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181422939","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v8n4p185","title":"Challenges Posed on The New Mining Act and Its Regulations in Tanzania","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tanzania; Enforcement; Business; Corporate governance; Order (exchange); Scale (ratio); Eviction; Sustainable development; Indigenous; Law enforcement; Environmental planning; Law; Political science; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.09302691121749544,"score_gpt":0.34633160309594463,"score_spread":0.2533046918784492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181422939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66037935,0.005380311,0.0000019587048,0.05038045,0.00022940293,0.00006778568,0.0000016652347,0.000004759306,0.28355432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983051,0.00015625224,0.0001389479,0.0003139642,0.0003918609,1.4416226e-7,3.7577443e-8,0.0000032190696,0.0006904816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940664,0.00009196984,0.00013092207,0.0000425015,0.0001996327,0.00012834824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994162,0.00021255315,0.000082791106,0.0000428031,0.0000708085,0.00017489571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006169435,0.000038862538,0.000086988475,0.000031839136,0.000110701076,0.000058137357,0.00008166597,0.00003957847,0.000008630044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003781488,0.000025816264,0.000014626107,0.00004842537,0.00009058389,0.00010439805,0.000016382153,0.00009976092,0.0000013071884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037094771,0.000009272465,0.00020344196,0.0000012692818,0.0000046784526,0.0000054946527,0.09742707,0.0000031183135,0.000004625298,0.9015808,0.0005027609,0.00025373718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075673946,0.00026769345,0.007767799,0.00012333458,0.000026256,0.000013288662,0.035778694,0.00009407646,0.000055577388,0.11314789,0.8418399,0.00012872001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028095642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005549868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84133714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003590263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001178718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10527567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2182297336","doi":"","title":"CITY OF TORONTO BY-LAW No. 666-2014 To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Morningside Avenue at Tams Road. The Council of the City of Toronto enacts: 1. Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, is amended as follows: A. By inserting in Schedule XXIII (Prohibited Turns) in § 950-1322, the following in","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Geography; Transport engineering; Public administration; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.029734193614803,"score_gpt":0.2912621558612559,"score_spread":0.2615279622464529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2182297336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.959341,0.0064711603,0.000004798775,0.0002928438,0.0002572728,0.0013915657,0.00008868274,0.000046018922,0.03210666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983911,0.00027756483,0.0002506175,0.00034738999,0.00008336866,0.00007152746,0.0000040918926,0.00005830831,0.00051601557],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931221,0.0011618051,0.0018726604,0.0009644235,0.0018012297,0.0010777981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960683,0.0009950736,0.0012576535,0.0011164125,0.00031513962,0.00024741673],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008517816,0.00059750245,0.0012954111,0.000036345304,0.0005745661,0.00011378239,0.0014023118,0.00041311377,0.00032763951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00246296,0.00043083125,0.00029111063,0.00025628784,0.0011973068,0.0007884272,0.00079620286,0.00057890237,0.0000012888694],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007499119,0.00040051047,0.05664205,0.00010665228,0.00014701982,0.0000045597535,0.9257826,0.00027354935,0.0122192735,0.0016639949,0.00010462702,0.0019052055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.027112275,0.0039597666,0.085581735,0.006455602,0.00093373185,0.000019552139,0.44847023,0.048625614,0.04171733,0.001013025,0.33015886,0.0059522483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5324332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9309667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4773124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023147317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022338092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2182656146","doi":"","title":"To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 195, Purchasing, on an interim basis to authorize standing committees of Council to increase the award authority of the Bid Committee in cases of emergency.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interim; Purchasing; Public administration; Law; Code (set theory); Political science; Business; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Marketing; Programming language","score_opus":0.14244438071259583,"score_gpt":0.38152805539877455,"score_spread":0.23908367468617872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2182656146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9412866,0.00009877194,0.00013754936,0.0016847269,0.00050760177,0.0007838686,0.0001972248,0.000024068462,0.055279557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99786985,0.000036992595,0.0008694348,0.00017493458,0.000076035925,0.000024120605,9.3519105e-7,0.000017366285,0.00093032315],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99616665,0.0007330343,0.0008843803,0.00034045143,0.0014413869,0.00043411364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974037,0.000449647,0.00032697784,0.0009598866,0.000579474,0.00028035222],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003841882,0.00022617103,0.00058064115,0.00008688012,0.00024895815,0.00002111516,0.0014157259,0.000117937234,0.0013364969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023984786,0.00015567103,0.00015690122,0.0007129533,0.00041962086,0.0002101985,0.00053804537,0.0001911866,0.0000037690832],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012428272,0.0009569877,0.16496034,0.00006307297,0.00008893868,0.000008857672,0.77170724,0.00020438865,0.00397483,0.05131674,0.0023227022,0.0031530478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016876654,0.005502368,0.08405685,0.0010136968,0.0002345857,0.000003341552,0.3714796,0.00038812112,0.02373933,0.0026376485,0.5078391,0.0014176896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4683468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58791465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5055164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069006416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001934198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2183102720","doi":"","title":"To appoint Valerie L. Jepson as Integrity Commissioner under section 158 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006. Whereas under section 158 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 the City of Toronto shall appoint an Integrity Commissioner;","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); History; Advertising; Business","score_opus":0.03873836191851536,"score_gpt":0.3249845917564282,"score_spread":0.2862462298379128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2183102720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6791631,0.00086476427,0.004057475,0.002720588,0.0024455457,0.0021285817,0.00015488532,0.00013212585,0.30833295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920908,0.0001082122,0.0007087909,0.0003424555,0.0005617635,0.000027656104,0.000009604814,0.000048380316,0.0061023035],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99087644,0.0034683887,0.0017600625,0.0008221741,0.0023269763,0.0007459478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929736,0.0008324675,0.0017045394,0.0024214764,0.0015797426,0.0004881661],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057200305,0.0006408627,0.001262923,0.00003707414,0.00072774134,0.00007978036,0.0024975194,0.00088354206,0.006156332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017007248,0.00036800228,0.0007427816,0.00042407415,0.0017455526,0.0012621044,0.0010798099,0.0010945454,0.000004102639],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0046800366,0.011735146,0.3331046,0.0012661377,0.0014838743,0.0000011351856,0.3764913,0.00072658213,0.077806905,0.13231233,0.046009768,0.0143821845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029200944,0.0020601628,0.64026916,0.0010775832,0.00069918344,0.000008344946,0.12044035,0.0009167769,0.075619,0.0201227,0.1341074,0.0017592538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8568652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82055455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31292775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024593608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007968322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2183305769","doi":"","title":"CITY OF TORONTO BY-LAW No. 327-2015 To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, respecting St. Helen's Avenue. The Toronto and East York Community Council enacts: 1. Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, is amended as follows:","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.12468321781563291,"score_gpt":0.3464252873811255,"score_spread":0.22174206956549258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2183305769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45589143,0.0078116814,0.000024068619,0.000553712,0.0007323046,0.001133925,0.0005631674,0.00017748463,0.5331122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98952925,0.0004246311,0.0007435775,0.0010747276,0.00049473223,0.000090057605,0.000015243751,0.00009662321,0.007531162],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99161154,0.0014230584,0.0013712017,0.00096846756,0.00316325,0.0014624672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933992,0.00071295525,0.0009440896,0.0022664787,0.001598548,0.0010787024],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077309813,0.00081489753,0.0013319438,0.00002704837,0.0018157011,0.0003359141,0.0025508925,0.0005236918,0.0039183693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018345997,0.0007067916,0.00034830754,0.00013843297,0.0018986287,0.0014292384,0.0014344873,0.0007896984,0.00004089546],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074208895,0.00044180808,0.0036836693,0.00005404271,0.00030303097,0.0000082727065,0.97307354,0.000008442853,0.00037679198,0.016374553,0.004169759,0.00076397747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014344847,0.00083172263,0.0002792832,0.00019008982,0.00016649865,0.000004649716,0.24599248,0.00025694384,0.00035221133,0.0006411143,0.7490334,0.0008171418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.869564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9331206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7448636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042517683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004108758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2184081005","doi":"","title":"BY-LAW No. 972-2013 To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Lawrence Avenue West at William R. Allen Road. The Council of the City of Toronto enacts: 1. Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, is amended as follows: A. By inserting in Schedule XXIV (Compulsory Turns) in § 950-1323, the following in","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transport engineering; Law; Code (set theory); Sociology; Civil engineering; Political science; Engineering; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.03896630338358851,"score_gpt":0.29065449523689374,"score_spread":0.2516881918533052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2184081005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96968305,0.007633574,0.0000015995014,0.000793912,0.00025549324,0.0014211418,0.000049170314,0.000038232236,0.020123797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99772435,0.00061553513,0.00022715049,0.00044982924,0.00006776461,0.00009230164,0.0000022798401,0.000044313598,0.000776479],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947171,0.0007654525,0.0013388961,0.00081629585,0.0013965362,0.0009656777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971302,0.0008116133,0.0007181811,0.00089834764,0.00022564302,0.00021597819],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043354854,0.0004893105,0.0008863737,0.000033467903,0.0005583305,0.00015546694,0.0014380213,0.00031654275,0.00034071697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008833258,0.00033915372,0.00019470802,0.0002279445,0.0011903964,0.0008353681,0.00075654214,0.0005579658,0.0000052903265],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021359578,0.00029265677,0.03393374,0.000057914942,0.00010518988,0.0000046838604,0.9594457,0.00032143065,0.0032165302,0.0006769587,0.00016741978,0.0015641892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013646881,0.0019028918,0.08000492,0.004375344,0.00039628468,0.000013467542,0.47132984,0.033232152,0.006482934,0.0009326266,0.38332096,0.0043617017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4599163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8937294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48811585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001435782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020334832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2185191513","doi":"","title":"WHEREAS Council of the City of Toronto has provided adequate information to the public and has held at least one public meeting in accordance with the Planning Act; The Council of the City of Toronto HEREBY ENACTS as follows: 1. Notwithstanding Article XIII Section 320-57 and 320-58 of the Etobicoke Zoning Code,","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public administration; Town council; Public information; Political science","score_opus":0.07325185141802981,"score_gpt":0.2647767199758875,"score_spread":0.19152486855785766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2185191513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95611316,0.00070452766,0.00009710467,0.006009377,0.0003110181,0.0014715132,0.000023166494,0.000023563141,0.035246544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99882644,0.000018081719,0.000111128866,0.00019670358,0.0000704991,0.000048442034,4.5426654e-7,0.000015694362,0.0007125804],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953572,0.0006210566,0.00079382345,0.00027692597,0.0024692544,0.00048174863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995426,0.0008987103,0.0013449051,0.000852664,0.0013787624,0.000098970166],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075202053,0.0002472519,0.00041718938,0.000017553373,0.0013304717,0.00032155585,0.0011503594,0.00016794581,0.00009268706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045340415,0.00010477188,0.00010951551,0.000575095,0.0015494532,0.0018570675,0.0006227973,0.00042881106,4.2002523e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042634044,0.000119279124,0.22399352,0.00010554497,0.0001323155,1.5085061e-7,0.75374126,0.00014388538,0.0132332845,0.0066204485,0.00026655986,0.0012174026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042140265,0.00073291076,0.3646226,0.0016633059,0.000368574,0.000016658396,0.5119298,0.0031117545,0.035469875,0.00073652284,0.07624465,0.0008892997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18814136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7707828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5826415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001622673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027648285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2185197477","doi":"","title":"BY-LAW No. 651-2008 To appoint Geri Sanson as Integrity Commissioner under section 158 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006. WHEREAS under section 158 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 the City of Toronto shall appoint an Integrity Commissioner;","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Law; Political science; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.03868767560021912,"score_gpt":0.31510464982921577,"score_spread":0.27641697422899664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2185197477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64912766,0.001716621,0.0015215843,0.0019211983,0.0021404994,0.0022398895,0.00031813077,0.00013770816,0.3408767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99056125,0.00029213633,0.0007117725,0.00045944127,0.00045034735,0.000030572322,0.000017261022,0.00005476561,0.0074224663],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909802,0.0027813374,0.0019241343,0.00089720596,0.0025728256,0.000844289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99291116,0.000652559,0.0016680604,0.002317306,0.001913051,0.0005378531],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035733853,0.0007224805,0.0013661849,0.000034784476,0.0011459521,0.00006462456,0.0024813514,0.0009776079,0.006270155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010200901,0.00042792677,0.00078534853,0.00046056864,0.002669453,0.0014831551,0.0009336458,0.0012140505,0.000006417279],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0059751207,0.015706474,0.21168725,0.0009986024,0.0016347378,0.000003842532,0.42322177,0.00046672483,0.12876447,0.067564584,0.14031777,0.003658664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041991645,0.0026605905,0.45193496,0.0011355652,0.0007034776,0.000028506582,0.11068908,0.00056890486,0.11665047,0.007758177,0.30109924,0.002571867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9194906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82824075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34143355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030162432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092004205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2185200959","doi":"","title":"Concerns from a European user-empowerment perspective relating to Internet content","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Repository of the University of Namur","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Empowerment; Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Political science; Public administration; Content (measure theory); Intervention (counseling); Public relations; Public economics; World Wide Web; Computer science; Economics; Law; Psychology; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03422837001450475,"score_gpt":0.26044619515914963,"score_spread":0.2262178251446449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2185200959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6586097,0.0000906206,0.00012599082,0.0007106367,0.00032183455,0.0001517898,0.0000060294306,0.000021980166,0.33996144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94998896,0.0000059078698,0.00044807052,0.00003019123,0.000090792004,5.0487056e-8,2.510021e-7,0.0000054368024,0.04943032],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988352,0.00039370952,0.00012792659,0.00017956791,0.0003278394,0.00013573897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991741,0.00009168741,0.00020142306,0.00024761277,0.00019664393,0.00008852072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022792848,0.000069161564,0.00014429644,0.00003365589,0.00030329163,0.000012410917,0.00064636295,0.000040690633,0.00009393526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014231908,0.00006620169,0.00012365846,0.00015509964,0.00040083638,0.00009213068,0.0002766981,0.000110307796,0.000032618733],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000162269,0.000105275285,0.07929037,0.0000046367804,0.00014134523,0.0000781134,0.9031479,0.00007829762,0.006865986,0.0066000423,0.0033613043,0.00016451695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087505486,0.00017712485,0.06535385,0.0003530993,0.00014475214,0.0000023334173,0.33193716,0.000048697537,0.0026612957,0.00017718051,0.5979907,0.00027876665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036789402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058511307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59462935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041338394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006644357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9696247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2189586175","doi":"","title":"Whereas authority is given to the Council of the City of Toronto by Section 34 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended, to pass this By-law; and Whereas the Council of the City of Toronto has provided adequate information to the public and has held at least one public meeting in accordance with the Planning Act; and","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Law; Political science; Public administration; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.061413069638402595,"score_gpt":0.2662147458642883,"score_spread":0.2048016762258857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2189586175","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8956991,0.0017879334,0.00022090854,0.037696782,0.0002624588,0.0027228403,0.00014392698,0.000031348252,0.061434712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973333,0.000027386606,0.00006728086,0.0011347787,0.00008495557,0.00010783145,0.0000017948436,0.000017892653,0.0012247715],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943625,0.0012466187,0.00079117087,0.00040045945,0.0026574282,0.00054186146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99544543,0.0010433882,0.0011557824,0.0010212078,0.0011759506,0.00015822121],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008480335,0.00033707195,0.0005182725,0.000018007731,0.0018009553,0.0004392341,0.0015771001,0.00018955025,0.00008842058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002876157,0.00013862166,0.000099829886,0.0005469799,0.001349707,0.0013968684,0.0009534719,0.00040858434,7.4706344e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006005445,0.000119134864,0.10352438,0.0001287566,0.00018087907,9.5754224e-8,0.87431115,0.0000758398,0.0014508647,0.0035035354,0.0137053225,0.0023995093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017562571,0.0007472676,0.09315535,0.00083337876,0.00023631487,0.000007647161,0.18283184,0.0007883929,0.005102293,0.00039946527,0.71349025,0.00065154245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37745622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5835291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69978493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018276614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014889014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2190280036","doi":"","title":"Against the Backdrop of Dignity and Equality, The Non-Absoluteness of Property Rights","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jotwell: The Journal of Things We Like","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Property rights; Law; Property (philosophy); Democracy; Political science; Constitution; Property law; Sociology; Human rights; Law and economics; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.05364131249292708,"score_gpt":0.31590508144679913,"score_spread":0.26226376895387205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2190280036","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82231086,0.006301913,0.0007853953,0.05046831,0.0031583689,0.0012076831,0.000022231021,0.000037388454,0.115707844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99456626,0.00031374415,0.00027809257,0.00055208686,0.00040488818,0.0000014207396,1.5787414e-7,0.000012945523,0.0038703878],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962248,0.00136761,0.0007147593,0.00011427015,0.0012830456,0.00029546546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99650526,0.000932524,0.0012783727,0.00044561815,0.0006768193,0.00016142357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0108558005,0.00015695528,0.00039560112,0.00005275475,0.00061390596,0.00009393551,0.001748877,0.00011223771,0.000019504098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000782617,0.000053936736,0.0001674577,0.00039261044,0.0013304497,0.00056300603,0.0003737784,0.00062348205,0.000009272076],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031101605,0.00021016448,0.0016462433,0.000085896994,0.00024933292,0.000012240568,0.9658754,0.00012129151,0.0010332945,0.002564481,0.024692029,0.0031986374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012919046,0.00046031296,0.0010469717,0.00044244571,0.0004511007,0.000030268955,0.05770777,0.00045486208,0.003039178,0.03960976,0.89509803,0.0003674218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003942403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030616432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9081676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008885851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028499615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59597605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2192161463","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v18i3.08","title":"A Critical Appraisal of Western Cape Forum for Intellectual Disability v Government of the Republic of South Africa 2011 5 SA 87 (WCC)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Constitution; Constitutionalism; Law; Perception; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.03146304632993881,"score_gpt":0.31708016510968756,"score_spread":0.28561711877974877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2192161463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91509163,0.023000622,0.013116151,0.014479953,0.0042347363,0.004109008,0.0006711034,0.00030895913,0.024987847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968108,0.00013218033,0.0014089487,0.000046096935,0.0007336195,0.00011164864,0.0000056743183,0.00012229306,0.0006287272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882712,0.0015394699,0.0024480668,0.00088482455,0.0040287804,0.0028276641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98980963,0.0038503595,0.0020214557,0.0016185108,0.0018169074,0.00088312774],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005859549,0.0007398842,0.0016438966,0.00012033262,0.0008113467,0.00016866687,0.002767341,0.00056792377,0.00022309106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016178558,0.0005850772,0.0012372916,0.0009400885,0.0049542864,0.0009397457,0.00063045055,0.0017667409,0.000009837804],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006489551,0.0047773104,0.0538281,0.00080466975,0.0025699954,0.00001383521,0.44927043,0.0005608515,0.0033115044,0.45928308,0.008307303,0.010783369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011504406,0.008489654,0.0011502885,0.00075111893,0.0022314382,0.00013656302,0.23857073,0.0006106534,0.035865743,0.056359272,0.6415667,0.0027634054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00096622313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002758669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6332594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025419656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030413105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2198549152","doi":"","title":"Inclusive Interpretations: Social Rights and Judicial Accountability","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; International human rights law; Legitimacy; Fundamental rights; Social rights; Law; Reservation of rights; Right to property; Politics; Charter; Obligation; Linguistic rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.006517283529891264,"score_gpt":0.31276639483288304,"score_spread":0.30624911130299176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2198549152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8033399,0.0027456696,0.010927391,0.007825141,0.001309989,0.00043698703,0.0000062304644,0.00016767539,0.17324103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99720937,0.00010850888,0.00009410434,0.00017397036,0.0018097954,0.000004943665,9.3349075e-7,0.000009457799,0.00058892014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971673,0.000486758,0.00024280683,0.00019506991,0.00044061718,0.0014674478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992906,0.0001882094,0.00015350818,0.00008637357,0.00017508138,0.00010623786],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035234848,0.00011300313,0.00017708348,0.00007466434,0.0020857975,0.00016253853,0.00032911106,0.0001239161,0.00008198227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005230215,0.0001023863,0.00007561527,0.00020479521,0.00049106014,0.00041916256,0.00008193859,0.0012254891,0.000040033683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036073587,0.0000366425,0.0012681409,0.000002005999,0.000049988244,5.949675e-7,0.12410248,8.1361463e-7,0.00001404834,0.85345244,0.00017327329,0.020863488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002955303,0.00008479924,0.00037585114,0.0000061527808,0.000030261244,0.000007903296,0.009616494,0.000026631164,0.000005543135,0.8908674,0.09854768,0.0001357501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023464484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022238722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19386949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012495907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013488128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99921334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2210039053","doi":"","title":"The New Wall of Separation: Permitting Diversity, Restricting Competition","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Jurisprudence; Legitimacy; Legislature; State (computer science); Legal pluralism; Legal profession; Legal realism; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01517884994801499,"score_gpt":0.3124879887257448,"score_spread":0.2973091387777298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2210039053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5551923,0.033717595,0.01075614,0.07596624,0.0016049695,0.00067735405,0.0000019777467,0.00022868707,0.32185474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933636,0.0022829052,0.00009332513,0.00006867749,0.00069497374,1.6876957e-7,5.0515285e-7,0.0000034293641,0.003492397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796104,0.0001907932,0.00020994259,0.00009095317,0.00048878975,0.0010584935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932855,0.000149299,0.00022965799,0.00009138788,0.00012290073,0.00007818236],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024294073,0.00006424846,0.00009143487,0.00004020109,0.0025004218,0.00010277683,0.00042757788,0.00005410621,0.000022426668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032565297,0.000051391824,0.00007762637,0.00028140063,0.00008993874,0.0002573815,0.000054056647,0.0008163515,0.00001242554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022750388,0.000019685918,0.0026909425,6.463154e-7,0.000026677855,0.0000016614524,0.03217007,0.00005958255,0.000051280284,0.92666894,0.00034462253,0.037943162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060027145,0.000420605,0.001612484,0.000036387468,0.000057011024,0.000030486905,0.033235542,0.00010725636,0.00007074687,0.7838797,0.1797359,0.00021363447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000847391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025036735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43817133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005856492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016067077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2214132031","doi":"","title":"Towards the application of the precautionary principle in South African law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review = Stellenbosch Regstydskrif","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Precautionary principle; Sustainable development; Legislation; Environmental law; Political science; Law and economics; Scale (ratio); Law; Business; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.060024578047306563,"score_gpt":0.34380490210830666,"score_spread":0.2837803240610001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2214132031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028620905,0.116506316,0.00022281193,0.012790784,0.0010566163,0.005896069,0.00007640405,0.00020871568,0.8603802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891661,0.004256461,0.00068263296,0.0020541684,0.00040297734,0.00044524999,0.000013502884,0.0000643149,0.0029145929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99245274,0.0023420837,0.0013336012,0.0008177635,0.0021259845,0.00092784484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956661,0.0004277898,0.0008138546,0.0021403604,0.0005727093,0.0003792238],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005671301,0.0004710984,0.0008975933,0.00007635399,0.0008455726,0.00009502173,0.0027274091,0.00030885168,0.00014203365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010574427,0.0002993299,0.0004256609,0.002175175,0.0024367375,0.00045418137,0.0007159511,0.0008323413,0.0002457667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046180005,0.00020421858,0.0009893908,0.0005549302,0.000047098518,0.000003387149,0.042700984,0.000051784846,0.000010767574,0.9488777,0.0020527185,0.004460852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045971086,0.00006851857,0.00016099642,0.00081579934,0.00010581862,0.000003151938,0.0032031576,0.000062410676,0.00012246572,0.0039066365,0.99072546,0.00036588943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065886043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032249275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98867273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004376141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094032456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2219214420","doi":"","title":"Expanding Constitutional 'Dialogue': A Lesson from South Africa","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Thursday; Constitution; Charter; Ceremony; Minor (academic); Political science; Law; Geography; Theology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04538617068798758,"score_gpt":0.290990455857946,"score_spread":0.2456042851699584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2219214420","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14838973,0.026344774,0.078734435,0.0014683465,0.0037865934,0.0005492201,0.00007849259,0.0004446516,0.74020374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99518317,0.00051968807,0.0005243532,0.000047200632,0.0011025532,0.000006661156,0.000003752874,0.000013698265,0.0025989078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99611807,0.0002698214,0.00028621373,0.00025079236,0.0005901366,0.002484982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992085,0.000095096104,0.0002022786,0.00015576062,0.00011676989,0.00022160244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019372174,0.00015647823,0.00020292228,0.00011298618,0.0010864354,0.00011236214,0.0005748489,0.00015600609,0.00066655513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003590069,0.0001460424,0.00014253304,0.00031718172,0.0008579585,0.0003792992,0.00005749137,0.0014905237,0.00034748562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045256886,0.000046050176,0.0040060063,5.618396e-7,0.00008945557,0.000012812502,0.20367959,0.0000012053107,0.000047975132,0.79024786,0.0001109406,0.0017122633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080339087,0.00013430422,0.00022701174,0.00003188161,0.00008556307,0.000020213613,0.07375078,0.000006084915,0.00009622822,0.8176448,0.10680023,0.00039951704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010521499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011570455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8467935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012661822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041786255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83560926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2221719150","doi":"10.29173/alr1286","title":"Through the Looking Glass: Mediator Conceptions of Philosophy, Process and Power","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Settlement (finance); Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Power (physics); Mediator; Party-directed mediation; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Alternative dispute resolution; Law; Public relations; Psychology; Social psychology; Business; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.022683630246883364,"score_gpt":0.34332485832182946,"score_spread":0.3206412280749461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2221719150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019926953,0.22677973,0.0000065835743,0.049572885,0.00016841954,0.0007418924,0.000005949796,0.000027415064,0.72070444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97698176,0.016891168,0.00014413093,0.00507945,0.00027688162,0.00004213243,0.0000013823308,0.000010243139,0.0005728657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884355,0.0001717737,0.0002849798,0.00017563769,0.0003201124,0.00020396212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899775,0.00045307088,0.00015483299,0.00023702919,0.00010162974,0.000055665612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037492218,0.00010132624,0.00026025384,0.0000059097547,0.00031145217,0.000028304145,0.00035025118,0.000054943772,0.0006353612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005329702,0.00006643956,0.0000697848,0.0002534872,0.0008987818,0.00033941655,0.000052505184,0.00011521946,0.00011263112],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011234655,0.000025734558,0.0001997305,0.00030330126,0.000020230536,3.4071005e-7,0.05523668,4.1390177e-7,0.0000016998202,0.9418361,0.0014636716,0.00091097725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006962757,0.000012148919,0.000007084548,0.0008054295,0.000061734616,7.3976713e-7,0.00038705918,7.565853e-7,0.000014784653,0.003422132,0.9951297,0.000088811845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021899862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003327428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.993666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026096528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006881383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6956759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2225086936","doi":"10.5623/cig2012-041","title":"Boundary Dispute Resolution: A Comparison of Ontario’s <i>Boundaries Act</i> and <i>Surveys Act</i> as Solutions for Municipal Roads","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GEOMATICA","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Barrie Urology Group","funders":"","keywords":"Boundary (topology); Statutory law; Context (archaeology); Dispute resolution; Process (computing); Political science; Public administration; Law; Business; Law and economics; Geography; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.053986309426007247,"score_gpt":0.34688122934389726,"score_spread":0.29289491991789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2225086936","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75915945,0.007974053,0.005007413,0.0036891827,0.002684234,0.0018807948,0.00017198887,0.00031709488,0.2191158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98888904,0.000012373559,0.0064033624,0.00010973535,0.0003184682,0.00008232615,0.000029500876,0.000019941297,0.0041352767],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972655,0.00044665008,0.0005103662,0.00023424224,0.00054565974,0.0009975464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983251,0.00054570974,0.0002452687,0.00040365628,0.0001558511,0.0003244039],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028531018,0.0001940905,0.00044834553,0.00006784581,0.0025336922,0.00031425175,0.00037723724,0.0001969262,0.00025682917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008228529,0.0001934918,0.00012265003,0.00026143665,0.0021125237,0.00067912025,0.0002568323,0.00022737737,0.00005766463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006573723,0.00039928532,0.072924264,0.00009249105,0.00011427131,6.892856e-7,0.81934327,0.000009418819,0.000060928112,0.09539195,0.008910965,0.0026867518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041613233,0.00012730181,0.016345197,0.000045119607,0.00011353432,0.000001817334,0.0053672907,0.00013844388,0.00006590035,0.0045963335,0.9725274,0.00025553574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06299751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.122917846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96361643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035817764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011972152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2225304967","doi":"","title":"Protecting Survivors of Domestic Violence within the Insurance Regime: Opportunities to Seek Termination or Variation of Insurance Contracts","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficiary; Insurance policy; Business; Legislation; Harm; Casualty insurance; Liability insurance; Actuarial science; Incentive; Law; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.028573178201582877,"score_gpt":0.2951715519902165,"score_spread":0.2665983737886336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2225304967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9821061,0.00014351553,0.0013257356,0.00086534,0.00063116103,0.0010247842,0.0000316648,0.00008888449,0.013782848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971873,0.000022989654,0.0014558547,0.0002584511,0.00019019374,0.0000834934,0.0000016884654,0.000017039329,0.0007830001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722916,0.0009518767,0.00055168394,0.0002656212,0.0007125404,0.00028914804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99717003,0.0011322481,0.0006579331,0.0004057648,0.00048725677,0.00014676362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035593752,0.00015091512,0.00030454775,0.000067541645,0.00047875487,0.00008287593,0.0005659303,0.00011969361,0.000033564385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008055223,0.000113998954,0.000050487284,0.00048052217,0.00050121243,0.0005409745,0.0000613562,0.00028414174,0.000019217485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074922363,0.0003773685,0.056316998,0.0006139753,0.000105200284,0.000025224832,0.38864562,0.0029749477,0.010236131,0.50534546,0.000082679566,0.034527164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00481768,0.0022733342,0.7216243,0.007368385,0.00020960461,0.000024823847,0.052820694,0.0023155785,0.030443784,0.06818889,0.10699847,0.0029144385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014098605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007941099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6653073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008539852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026763373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99246657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2226823929","doi":"10.1080/02587203.2000.11827607","title":"The State as Trustee of Land","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal on Human Rights","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Law; State (computer science); Plaintiff; Constitution; Doctrine; Common law; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Trust law","score_opus":0.022867181371909424,"score_gpt":0.31622755676574815,"score_spread":0.29336037539383875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2226823929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65864193,0.00016128615,0.0000021461879,0.00031778202,0.00025200055,0.00012997375,0.000010388721,0.00003471149,0.34044978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9435236,0.000016035463,0.000042143907,0.000056309913,0.0005647319,0.0000033467638,5.194829e-7,0.000015859869,0.055777483],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726194,0.0005289218,0.00047237842,0.00019577229,0.00097376114,0.00056724227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986194,0.00023507002,0.0003149426,0.00032057613,0.00015165033,0.00035839799],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011434988,0.00016588971,0.00025053218,0.00010016543,0.003333414,0.00026721592,0.0008251136,0.000071657254,0.003284592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007517414,0.000096904914,0.00017210122,0.00031739264,0.0008736372,0.00015447565,0.000020484413,0.00049717136,0.000617843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004561352,0.00018904087,0.0019195047,0.000006732268,0.0001849063,0.00023007997,0.8199571,0.00020705644,0.000013963316,0.16678543,0.0028550837,0.0071949684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053238723,0.00033260207,0.00045717126,0.000037175454,0.000026627597,0.0000059045014,0.0030336739,0.0000025002687,0.00006489562,0.14035194,0.85495895,0.00019616562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049971836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005976912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8521039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000113603215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014244822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2234647739","doi":"","title":"Nasiebou in 'n eenheidstaat versus die toekenning van groepregte : diskoerse oor die akkommodering van diversiteit met spesifieke verwysing na Afrika en Suid-Afrika : geesteswetenskappe","year":2014,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Litnet Akademies : 'n Joernaal vir die Geesteswetenskappe, Natuurwetenskappe, Regte en Godsdienswetenskappe","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021476067480476143,"score_gpt":0.28640158692246376,"score_spread":0.2649255194419876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2234647739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78847224,0.059731424,0.0013238328,0.005802928,0.02405819,0.010321755,0.0026548335,0.005123111,0.102511704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93961424,0.0073235543,0.008352618,0.0012170761,0.009698709,0.00059160206,0.0011910495,0.002118055,0.029893091],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94182,0.010487759,0.009673427,0.011868445,0.009651862,0.01649851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96213716,0.014910996,0.005846741,0.00861591,0.0029358147,0.0055533876],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","open_science","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015037068,0.009023891,0.010493227,0.004805137,0.006448436,0.0036847836,0.0118137365,0.007512084,0.0008333496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01416529,0.010292176,0.0055156774,0.00713544,0.0071659368,0.0065526827,0.009652302,0.013709519,0.0055696475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.029967094,0.0076055974,0.124998085,0.007683583,0.014463539,0.015892388,0.48302662,0.03383133,0.018703451,0.026795324,0.014854505,0.22217846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.028546033,0.007411343,0.026884105,0.008432656,0.0063841282,0.00028436902,0.067128025,0.021365015,0.0028841964,0.007255814,0.80253416,0.020890178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007583896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00847985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7876796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007963303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002057413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2235259443","doi":"10.7202/1100727ar","title":"DE L’ANC À LA CONSTITUTION SUD-AFRICAINE : CONTINUITÉ OU RUPTURE DANS LA PROTECTION DES DROITS FONDAMENTAUX ?","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021290258458733807,"score_gpt":0.29178877516789653,"score_spread":0.2704985167091627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2235259443","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21864696,0.0009497406,0.009808173,0.010414033,0.0032458222,0.0008451026,0.00040728415,0.00055869715,0.7551242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.914447,0.00039943506,0.00087941263,0.00021361475,0.0016400736,0.00019983007,0.00008023579,0.000043867483,0.0820965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99680424,0.00061054697,0.00053770427,0.00056171836,0.0006813239,0.0008044516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824136,0.0004993245,0.00032378425,0.00027175643,0.0003373637,0.0003263783],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017674813,0.0003140193,0.00033162147,0.00027524817,0.00048582483,0.00038632535,0.00072607986,0.00052923424,0.00049328874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015047438,0.00040299265,0.00027212856,0.0010901451,0.0016770785,0.0006269757,0.00013215108,0.000666359,0.0006626629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060202794,0.00021303291,0.0028609727,0.000114688555,0.00016464907,0.00041634086,0.07201303,0.00065757264,0.0011068594,0.89833283,0.001653324,0.022406481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006235369,0.00007901589,0.0036650372,0.00061785796,0.00011011916,0.00028239758,0.0046834648,0.0051975343,0.0003102811,0.082444355,0.90155697,0.00042941535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011746319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006470397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89990366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030759547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091457745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2239920060","doi":"","title":"Franchisees as Consumers: The South African Example","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Promotion (chess); Legislation; Distribution (mathematics); Intellectual property; Entrepreneurship; Franchise; Investment (military); Goods and services; Globe; Small business; Marketing; Commerce; Market economy; International trade; Economics; Finance; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.032983879553609846,"score_gpt":0.3012949561335534,"score_spread":0.2683110765799436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2239920060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28774008,0.040297367,0.0029491892,0.01719882,0.002650745,0.000739623,0.000007894499,0.00033307797,0.6480832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881362,0.00042499532,0.00007863589,0.00025120043,0.00092918193,0.000007771598,6.692011e-7,0.000021370342,0.010149975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956037,0.0005289657,0.00024149242,0.00020151974,0.00086600875,0.0025583152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988648,0.00016164895,0.0001878859,0.000260813,0.00020274603,0.00032208132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052873744,0.0001457305,0.00017587829,0.00006746989,0.0010328576,0.00025179633,0.0008977365,0.00009637994,0.00017161982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094779,0.00010083653,0.000114815375,0.0004239602,0.00055309373,0.00027410348,0.0000641774,0.0017869221,0.0006141196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057032034,0.000043207234,0.0041268845,9.915964e-7,0.00013449759,0.000007833848,0.36395988,0.000012619347,0.0000068384575,0.6216409,0.0013995618,0.008609749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034600942,0.00012395268,0.00004760239,0.000004347367,0.000031742613,0.000030240168,0.18599817,0.0000032428193,0.0000059950185,0.254971,0.55829823,0.00013945869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007438066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00704765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7003961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011043816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067657623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241121537","doi":"","title":"'n Kritiek op 'n normatiewe vergelyking van die 2003- en 2011-weergawes van die South African Languages Bill aan die hand van sosiolinguistiese beginsels van taalwetgewing : geesteswetenskappe","year":2012,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Litnet Akademies : 'n Joernaal vir die Geesteswetenskappe, Natuurwetenskappe, Regte en Godsdienswetenskappe","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01815445649468825,"score_gpt":0.28544391165623206,"score_spread":0.2672894551615438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241121537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44547132,0.3197561,0.0010518894,0.009207105,0.03667526,0.016153684,0.012421047,0.008200745,0.15106286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8562321,0.01434367,0.0066510844,0.0022683586,0.023501828,0.0009931319,0.0020702647,0.0026485238,0.09129103],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9393197,0.009397681,0.0109406775,0.009508981,0.009882983,0.020950008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95992815,0.008078023,0.008173896,0.009149461,0.0059178434,0.008752628],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014654237,0.0106863,0.011182685,0.0045706513,0.010375432,0.0047057914,0.011534201,0.007968376,0.0023893577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017139494,0.010230763,0.0046035033,0.006160558,0.011302284,0.0071568256,0.007824407,0.013684638,0.012389019],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0047462606,0.006099283,0.06946067,0.0055132946,0.010044605,0.006915481,0.75699925,0.0031249805,0.0060923444,0.00730343,0.04753026,0.07617015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008285668,0.0023649123,0.014408196,0.0044040466,0.0048704776,0.0003632326,0.09141803,0.0016074923,0.0029338745,0.005452354,0.8488708,0.015020927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008223687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00315466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8013405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056680767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030867208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241456428","doi":"","title":"From Natural Justice to Fairness – Thresholds, Content, and the Role of Judicial Review","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Citizenship; Natural justice; Immigration; Judicial review; Geography","score_opus":0.01650871147873161,"score_gpt":0.3037533496124567,"score_spread":0.2872446381337251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241456428","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10923958,0.86266434,0.00025097007,0.009167651,0.0012987572,0.0005275278,0.0000075026237,0.00002667627,0.016817015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9694683,0.02740667,0.000053860585,0.0006890978,0.0018521294,0.0000063171383,7.955613e-7,0.000009768353,0.0005130736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973056,0.00038087228,0.0002778103,0.00011327521,0.000474341,0.0014481144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991315,0.00024135046,0.0001909469,0.00014062387,0.0001437048,0.00015188624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039361,0.00010601174,0.00028004582,0.00003073403,0.0004290942,0.000044554195,0.00045246707,0.000056364635,0.000049874663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009186242,0.000068462665,0.00009320705,0.00022799043,0.00032948333,0.0002923355,0.000077096876,0.0009982531,0.000026168364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001528656,0.000037793645,0.003189424,0.000018757562,0.00012977824,5.5668033e-7,0.05116048,3.3902072e-7,0.00012074101,0.9241003,0.00055359857,0.020535354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018789568,0.00013353681,0.0010126369,0.000544229,0.0010528467,0.00004599187,0.1257917,0.000008169344,0.00012821003,0.4163431,0.45261845,0.00044217182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031918988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020014918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8602287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002634283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059444876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48252174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2248504465","doi":"","title":"Stimulating Sustainable Economic Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa With Legal Systems Enabling Women Entrepreneurs’ Creativity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Multinational corporation; Creativity; Poverty; Political science; Modernization theory; Economic growth; Informal sector; Sustainable growth rate; Business; Economics; Law; Geography; Finance","score_opus":0.010602060745908769,"score_gpt":0.257012697076723,"score_spread":0.2464106363308142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2248504465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95189935,0.013597809,0.0007378611,0.0002606899,0.00033448322,0.00045877387,0.0000025973889,0.00008772724,0.03262069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99207777,0.0010558843,0.000035412806,0.000010044123,0.0010543384,0.000036524696,0.0000010636154,0.000037679,0.0056912703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920604,0.0006406334,0.0004172499,0.00029339132,0.0004689498,0.0061193598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877846,0.00027101472,0.00029594815,0.00017976719,0.00012287851,0.00035191755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069686915,0.00023632754,0.0003760474,0.00026067498,0.0007993533,0.00042061423,0.00045897037,0.00012884144,0.00005032975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037638907,0.00021310268,0.00007084537,0.00045509153,0.00016723078,0.0018714037,0.00007363609,0.0016046657,0.000050989227],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034022858,0.00032155061,0.24030569,0.000052668533,0.00022511701,0.0000691406,0.16708258,0.005102979,0.00009774679,0.58490527,0.00017722645,0.0013198217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0070674983,0.0019034996,0.0043721884,0.0003525879,0.00021604808,0.00039763167,0.5575577,0.001315377,0.00031595293,0.06846595,0.35511,0.0029255783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070961355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016568253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5164393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00956323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037943327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254167256","doi":"","title":"Spam Legislation in Canada: Federalism, Freedom of Expression and the Regulation of the Internet","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Spamming; Charter; Business; Parliament; Internet privacy; Government (linguistics); Scrutiny; The Internet; Political science; Law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0058829383960089165,"score_gpt":0.2244610233739713,"score_spread":0.21857808497796238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254167256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98630464,0.0024102102,0.00036086552,0.0024268846,0.0002167021,0.00017094561,0.0000011321199,0.0000030025246,0.008105596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987146,0.00010491845,0.000025141373,0.00001163822,0.00013862134,0.000001236444,4.0176903e-7,0.0000037874781,0.0009996434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998573,0.00032737936,0.00025012658,0.000063692896,0.00036652602,0.000419242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946904,0.00009946193,0.00027273453,0.000084239044,0.00006071574,0.000013822116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014922718,0.00004872112,0.00010577424,0.000027326623,0.00014451846,0.00002098988,0.00021638317,0.000036085297,0.000011997848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000116280164,0.000028054921,0.000032700755,0.00015593704,0.00022632565,0.00012004068,0.000030988904,0.00040587582,1.3115059e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012374324,0.000022309916,0.09097911,0.000004331163,0.000018110895,2.7730889e-7,0.024196912,0.0011061858,0.0011813212,0.8803617,0.0005387547,0.0014672948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038267788,0.00007796247,0.14806801,0.00021131843,0.000052391388,0.000016141628,0.026665496,0.0023397068,0.0027910403,0.7996213,0.016078034,0.00025184636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91056526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9846205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.080740385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083875284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024730242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43870386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254936749","doi":"","title":"Private Law, the State and the Duty to Protect: Tort Actions for Police Failures in Gendered Violence Cases","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Tort; Accountability; Duty; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; State (computer science); Liability","score_opus":0.019732282883735443,"score_gpt":0.32338132619098997,"score_spread":0.3036490433072545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254936749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9134295,0.004696422,0.0047080526,0.063981116,0.00030804792,0.0038480277,0.000018030318,0.00007720896,0.008933618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970857,0.0009831005,0.00014464714,0.0006377448,0.00029890568,0.00006115847,1.933656e-7,0.000008047012,0.00078053534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759865,0.00029222824,0.00021265836,0.00016228983,0.00028157115,0.0014525877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992982,0.00028040697,0.000106817555,0.0001556157,0.000074477044,0.000084468484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027776817,0.00010840532,0.00013772133,0.000048170157,0.0012176577,0.00019971083,0.00045092482,0.000046615685,0.0000069608727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037364394,0.000063365376,0.00006328747,0.00029570426,0.00028493864,0.00021098931,0.00003291363,0.0008319238,0.0000056214767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031128438,0.000036262056,0.0001590929,0.0000023977054,0.000039780698,0.000002345704,0.09093305,0.00006576606,0.00010483435,0.885273,0.00006518159,0.023007007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011999932,0.00037026312,0.0007262723,0.00004070508,0.000034674747,0.00007461202,0.03482948,0.000037313297,0.00015824538,0.85492945,0.107369244,0.00022975335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012128133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09317551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10730407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005225609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085698155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255825711","doi":"","title":"Taalwetgewing in Suid-Afrika","year":2009,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Litnet Akademies : 'n Joernaal vir die Geesteswetenskappe, Natuurwetenskappe, Regte en Godsdienswetenskappe","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.012702023489887559,"score_gpt":0.3063201525003647,"score_spread":0.2936181290104771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255825711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4997372,0.13432078,0.0003010554,0.031053836,0.018469147,0.010566989,0.0017343865,0.0047733593,0.29904324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9054195,0.00740794,0.00493597,0.0037577937,0.008939458,0.00030446897,0.00051637855,0.0009576691,0.06776078],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95539,0.0058528753,0.008788662,0.008475235,0.007827005,0.013666264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9786269,0.004882629,0.0039948276,0.0061936784,0.002420835,0.003881098],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011191739,0.0063865837,0.0076787025,0.003995399,0.0035293337,0.0024852809,0.00882472,0.0070488313,0.00075852196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075387363,0.0069436296,0.0033032482,0.009822331,0.0051775086,0.004257828,0.0025344554,0.011566927,0.006028143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007994835,0.011267472,0.10527823,0.0029499908,0.0039705588,0.021455927,0.42737135,0.008562581,0.018060148,0.091976695,0.13393646,0.16717577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009311379,0.00294237,0.055805963,0.0038567323,0.0012813035,0.00028573463,0.019326942,0.003843516,0.0014298469,0.012706025,0.87872314,0.010487044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045888457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036015704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7447867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050513907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023980879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99876803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256405310","doi":"","title":"Jones v Tsige: A Banking Law Perspective","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Law; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Political science; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.022827424478379557,"score_gpt":0.26784103102200624,"score_spread":0.2450136065436267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256405310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6442578,0.00041103593,0.000045658842,0.0035260464,0.0002817133,0.00044798994,0.000016704067,0.00018517983,0.3508279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98337615,0.000023828108,0.0023226338,0.00023120154,0.00020052987,0.000001317506,0.0000047209073,0.000025632755,0.013813994],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971324,0.00050338753,0.00018851343,0.00054439274,0.0009332478,0.00069804926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795717,0.00023714526,0.00023726533,0.0004953185,0.00069899886,0.00037408317],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000882863,0.0002292993,0.00036790106,0.00021500333,0.0020343347,0.00014844454,0.0011849995,0.00034650846,0.0078162495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003450806,0.00028798787,0.00025671223,0.0007835792,0.001496635,0.0022729621,0.00041330815,0.0005476881,0.001988188],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001281708,0.00023545256,0.06707555,0.00003917772,0.00020260604,0.00007161487,0.49692166,0.000012782087,0.0035748708,0.42900443,0.0017723712,0.0009613054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027295947,0.00027232344,0.12763841,0.00022471556,0.0002613496,0.000007981953,0.34445006,0.000029452098,0.0016125303,0.08584931,0.43529758,0.0016267085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021663455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006290551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4335252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006192127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019074148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256544311","doi":"","title":"Mandatory relief and supervisory jurisdiction : when is it appropriate, just and equitable?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Law; Original jurisdiction; Political science; Government (linguistics); Federal jurisdiction; Constitutional court; Exclusive jurisdiction; Constitution; Constitutional right; Separation of powers","score_opus":0.03790536619238992,"score_gpt":0.2896650696295711,"score_spread":0.2517597034371812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256544311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41174302,0.012020775,0.00042849453,0.023452964,0.0014563681,0.0006494314,0.00011766672,0.00025875185,0.5498725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902971,0.00035635076,0.0026876782,0.001200936,0.0018408241,0.000008406676,0.0000014241498,0.000030512538,0.0035768098],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749726,0.0002782631,0.00040863417,0.0003678548,0.0006920379,0.0007559684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987031,0.00009718401,0.0002081709,0.00022241223,0.00016066711,0.00060842634],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017052197,0.0002155792,0.00029161188,0.00011897693,0.002242692,0.0005276716,0.00032774554,0.00020052999,0.00094749936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013930893,0.0001984644,0.00008048686,0.00020817514,0.00088956195,0.0008581035,0.00017417586,0.0006130739,0.000103413215],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006599516,0.00006659284,0.0035342413,0.000023905093,0.00007016553,0.000016258226,0.9490961,0.0000030204121,0.00005228128,0.019261539,0.012298056,0.015511866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005101792,0.0000833941,0.00021810981,0.000034386194,0.00007838076,0.000015170308,0.09559638,0.000027935112,0.000027020496,0.0049377927,0.8981885,0.00028280175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007682623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074953836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88589036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018482807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014984027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256798114","doi":"","title":"Confidentiality and Disclosure in Mediation: When the Chicken Won't Talk","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Mediation; Statutory law; Scope (computer science); Law; Conciliation; Alternative dispute resolution; Political science; Lawyer supported mediation; Business; Common law; Online dispute resolution; Computer science","score_opus":0.012520252402349174,"score_gpt":0.27346304327326293,"score_spread":0.26094279087091377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256798114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9464041,0.013589852,0.00040681625,0.01699585,0.0005436981,0.00028459207,0.0000028713528,0.000039629198,0.021732567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99169743,0.0041528633,0.000024000228,0.00011575894,0.0007924757,0.00000490163,9.1787814e-7,0.000008173602,0.003203497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974283,0.00043327268,0.00023159773,0.00014515633,0.0005228201,0.0012388387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947834,0.00012125847,0.00012414834,0.00012477081,0.00006126337,0.000090225694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032816702,0.00009072733,0.00013473183,0.00004908155,0.0008739029,0.0000950447,0.00037781813,0.000089162204,0.0001250958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030921574,0.000064556014,0.00005118325,0.00021094712,0.00048579506,0.00031458816,0.00004538744,0.0014124836,0.000016307731],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005558022,0.000086701664,0.14582475,0.000004342328,0.00011416406,0.00003630005,0.42131612,0.000009473407,0.000032784814,0.42521712,0.000940467,0.006362211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014000122,0.00014791507,0.029462792,0.000020076446,0.000043111177,0.00029989667,0.07081065,0.000023345412,0.000024794283,0.69260955,0.2047601,0.00039773504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030865103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0388821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35050547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048102927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016957966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9786558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258318312","doi":"","title":"Canada Water Kerk (Londenbediening) : van oraloor","year":2015,"lang":"nl","type":"article","venue":"Die Kerkblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Maar; Theology; Philosophy; Geology","score_opus":0.032261506533828525,"score_gpt":0.2811571590310056,"score_spread":0.24889565249717704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258318312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19496869,0.0094920155,0.000055816694,0.02068823,0.018665828,0.0011074707,0.00040619733,0.00038222675,0.75423354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8769703,0.000041215248,0.00022779194,0.0015151938,0.0017702339,0.00002305164,0.000042701966,0.000064919135,0.119344585],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944233,0.00044651827,0.0006258377,0.00077142013,0.001915991,0.0018169477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970664,0.00014609893,0.00017825486,0.0007276758,0.0005150571,0.0013665126],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011228239,0.00048980676,0.00059384416,0.00008773359,0.00067548186,0.00034278637,0.0012210852,0.00033652736,0.0027661645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008445361,0.0003962565,0.00014822478,0.00044291277,0.0006680515,0.0004854594,0.00046017297,0.0005718002,0.007370086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010388948,0.00017684273,0.007338237,0.00006129318,0.00021625876,0.000923907,0.36304379,0.000074031515,0.0000679528,0.0022001325,0.62301004,0.002783657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066440256,0.00011171681,0.00016850246,0.000044645632,0.00009712534,0.0000020691773,0.015789324,0.000064919666,0.0006018054,0.0014523218,0.98035705,0.0006461129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9275081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.912298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68200165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012195471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033352398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259655095","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1603830","title":"Back to the Future in South African Security: From Intentions to Effective Mechanisms: Part II - Restorative Justice, Crime, and (In)security in Africa","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Criminology; Economic Justice; Political science; Computer security; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.010773285500786475,"score_gpt":0.27610596113995145,"score_spread":0.26533267563916496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259655095","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91196597,0.007771597,0.0031628318,0.040871616,0.0020126922,0.0030681416,0.00015344839,0.000064495856,0.030929195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977702,0.0004359851,0.00014769574,0.00019231618,0.00070552033,0.00008697374,7.439328e-7,0.000019684785,0.00064090255],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950898,0.0013540478,0.00040319795,0.0004584898,0.0005661332,0.0021283315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987775,0.00043100887,0.0001463011,0.00024413248,0.00013709237,0.0002639747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044431635,0.00022585891,0.00033623126,0.00032505643,0.00052956445,0.00011269486,0.0006021169,0.00016798468,0.00010095017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011762497,0.00015152374,0.00007494841,0.0012692258,0.00016723276,0.00036249115,0.00022796584,0.0016666304,0.000094774994],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004623995,0.00017398268,0.0017412361,0.000004653254,0.00005574722,0.000017593818,0.75927913,0.000009198266,0.0001524054,0.23531227,0.000638891,0.0021524818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012421127,0.0006165664,0.002876363,0.00022701533,0.0000599883,0.0000043288605,0.30910522,0.000009969678,0.000047441474,0.5930867,0.09231217,0.00041208358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014027779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18191001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4501739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023848985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011373298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.833018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260600733","doi":"","title":"Women’s Constitutional Activism in Canada and South Africa","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Political economy; Development economics; Economics","score_opus":0.01970990178880861,"score_gpt":0.2346631737128687,"score_spread":0.2149532719240601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260600733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90515625,0.0023151936,0.00039657028,0.00029324973,0.00039538761,0.000121562094,0.000005256416,0.000020658441,0.09129588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99836326,0.00024607344,0.000060507606,0.00004951382,0.00013988197,0.000007507554,1.7197486e-7,0.000005644462,0.0011274681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99708843,0.0001417026,0.0001720907,0.00014457061,0.00037131546,0.0020818587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956036,0.000048150352,0.000089666624,0.00007060353,0.000046393587,0.00018480992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013786698,0.00009255296,0.00013290708,0.00007530593,0.00033343153,0.00003377998,0.0002314304,0.000051585383,0.00020872375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016286506,0.00008706116,0.000021110782,0.00019720531,0.00041318865,0.00021246642,0.000031341853,0.0010696787,0.000010185438],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038543978,0.000025444737,0.044807322,0.0000013665484,0.00003940103,0.00002537189,0.23998412,0.0000018594261,0.0000049486275,0.712585,0.00004071858,0.0024459036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012600473,0.00016964035,0.009684312,0.00002579765,0.000021443451,0.00008286955,0.3260124,0.000011495038,0.000018292145,0.5530579,0.10911977,0.0005360546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64808005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9593729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31129283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068123695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02720526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260725809","doi":"","title":"The Duty of Fairness: From Nicholson to Baker and Beyond","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Notice; Supreme court; Law; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Political science; Citizenship; Nothing; Immigration; History","score_opus":0.010420384982274211,"score_gpt":0.27279196745253065,"score_spread":0.26237158247025644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260725809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93536764,0.019609746,0.0013585245,0.006662621,0.00053624815,0.00023367975,0.0000070143524,0.00003441183,0.036190122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99082905,0.0047182254,0.00012801292,0.00013404246,0.00042660214,0.0000030114536,3.4713221e-7,0.000010359453,0.0037503736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768585,0.00019120955,0.0002199098,0.00014163413,0.00046977322,0.0012916249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992641,0.00021256122,0.0001179437,0.00015370983,0.00011135199,0.00014031497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016665957,0.00008789302,0.00014276686,0.00003596092,0.001193831,0.000059176564,0.00040831638,0.00007042019,0.00003841369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038631103,0.00006199886,0.000059303202,0.00023384784,0.0003390513,0.00017512591,0.00005656057,0.0008142409,0.000028422313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021679692,0.00011244248,0.04641754,0.0000027565968,0.00030875197,0.00001924838,0.31694332,0.000022189979,0.00047070064,0.5818366,0.0041767606,0.049472913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062560895,0.00028332366,0.004141958,0.000015754751,0.000042411455,0.000040596624,0.048667826,0.000011547174,0.00018248854,0.38642272,0.55930233,0.00026343853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015381122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072299396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5551256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035126903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012940727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9182103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262034836","doi":"","title":"Good governance for NGOs : tax international","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Without Prejudice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Corporate governance; Political science; Business; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.02636243065743611,"score_gpt":0.347983518449591,"score_spread":0.3216210877921549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262034836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016614143,0.0013777398,0.0036725784,0.0053644124,0.004484676,0.0007617437,0.00012442176,0.00024825378,0.96735203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95932037,0.000027564229,0.006314054,0.0003992511,0.002246182,0.000101737794,0.000004572664,0.000017084316,0.03156919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986769,0.000069166585,0.00015464707,0.00017985047,0.0004631198,0.00045633462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992395,0.00015366774,0.00013230195,0.00018799337,0.00011668494,0.0001698362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006880983,0.000094752686,0.000120286,0.000018959405,0.00026767794,0.000070449256,0.0004994562,0.00009103115,0.0003995163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083109684,0.00009496692,0.0000656207,0.00014103143,0.00016337683,0.00062502857,0.00007846438,0.000106807805,0.00027391003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009175506,0.00025377097,0.22620413,0.00002215674,0.00010585448,0.0000012195036,0.1757827,0.0000061785245,0.00022168916,0.5417435,0.044501655,0.011065355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027437002,0.000013736675,0.0043917294,0.000014216195,0.000016098282,4.6308224e-7,0.00075993367,0.000027813132,0.00014408969,0.0007309609,0.9934896,0.00013696376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007526147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002711107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94898796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016041407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007632564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43744233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262943403","doi":"","title":"Non-Universalité, Illégitimité Et Surcomplexité Des Droits Économiques Et Sociaux? Des Préoccupations Légitimes Mais Hypertrophiées: Regard Sur La Jurisprudence Canadienne Et Sud-Africaine (Non-Universality, Illegitimacy and Over Complexity of Economic and Social Rights? Legitimate Concerns But Hypertrophied: Focus on Canadian and South African Jurisprudence)","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.037417363919534964,"score_gpt":0.2909212037901191,"score_spread":0.2535038398705841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262943403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9691094,0.0028947606,0.0002062852,0.00817572,0.00021754329,0.00076137844,0.0012706952,0.00006301207,0.017301196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98654866,0.009366803,0.0009211448,0.00028092554,0.00038477665,0.000019545434,0.000027821623,0.00009695658,0.0023533686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99278635,0.0012861802,0.0009019012,0.0009873295,0.00045600694,0.0035822634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99636686,0.0009529829,0.0008317602,0.00035056556,0.00041293624,0.0010848826],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002652508,0.0008127459,0.0012716602,0.0005606527,0.003072174,0.00044539652,0.0007255299,0.00047684164,0.00014184492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018827533,0.00087653333,0.00029414837,0.00043246182,0.01149367,0.0020604806,0.00027683054,0.002041147,0.000010399773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031444276,0.00017105696,0.023336247,0.000094309115,0.0006655994,0.00020951148,0.16482675,0.000083337174,0.000029163717,0.8082928,0.0005543033,0.0014224696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007747088,0.0028235528,0.11922298,0.00080493523,0.0009441587,0.0015993393,0.076469585,0.0017795498,0.000092626964,0.7461763,0.038894664,0.0034452195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7613998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85813963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096739806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055640056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010857351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263659966","doi":"","title":"Tercon Contractors: The Effect of Exclusion Clauses on the Tendering Process","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Procurement; Business; Law and economics; Industrial organization; Economics; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.007675066680775974,"score_gpt":0.3003185728067872,"score_spread":0.2926435061260112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263659966","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98390865,0.00057770667,0.000060773444,0.0032506704,0.0005350167,0.00030010624,7.792734e-7,0.00002939658,0.011336912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99852103,0.00018746982,0.0000031017128,0.000072956485,0.00077671226,0.0000097535385,1.6866923e-7,0.000013981136,0.00041483174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738026,0.0004373642,0.00020702771,0.00012733064,0.0005902847,0.0012577216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984912,0.0009344211,0.00021819146,0.00020928959,0.00008751431,0.000059371607],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056885616,0.00012327197,0.00015545698,0.000041195042,0.0010388875,0.00010544272,0.0007972423,0.00010424126,0.00008317799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013874696,0.000056537217,0.00010666122,0.00021266882,0.00037767395,0.00018064033,0.00003867503,0.0028422768,0.000017790293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004608371,0.00017535515,0.047893338,0.000037004622,0.00038841713,0.00000973753,0.1619434,0.00005624953,0.020632919,0.7113504,0.0003072011,0.056745186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004273102,0.006043083,0.0061920322,0.0004332732,0.0005108037,0.00023028755,0.13209774,0.00016254753,0.068585426,0.55867434,0.22133039,0.001466997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002933136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021106915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22102319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021086607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008264535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265158501","doi":"","title":"Equality in the workplace - reflections from South Africa and beyond, Ockert Dupper and Christoph Garbers (Eds.) : boekbesprekings","year":2010,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Journal of South African Law / Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disappointment; Political science; Equity (law); Library science; Variety (cybernetics); Kingdom; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.027131398170269588,"score_gpt":0.30324564687889755,"score_spread":0.27611424870862794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265158501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77374226,0.03906721,0.00034631693,0.020620806,0.0051003257,0.0019672003,0.00091501774,0.0002042284,0.15803662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99175775,0.0005243143,0.002055686,0.0007709955,0.002042067,0.000037634072,0.000008846123,0.00013122034,0.0026714972],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98929465,0.0023606217,0.002558663,0.0013105785,0.002546734,0.0019287722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99241287,0.002280088,0.002273164,0.001266507,0.0006164063,0.0011509424],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006303156,0.0011039771,0.0017836537,0.0005059052,0.002083391,0.0013817691,0.0019322701,0.0011162002,0.000216267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015516283,0.00086614897,0.000649794,0.0019715626,0.004672691,0.001241115,0.0004934392,0.0045037544,0.000062588726],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009765627,0.0006051481,0.011936253,0.000097241485,0.000408563,0.00032698718,0.96929467,0.000019730534,0.0020730314,0.011179088,0.0020479101,0.0010348188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026465643,0.00060460024,0.004046785,0.00033061494,0.0009150203,0.00006562984,0.16888204,0.000051060113,0.0001651612,0.006867257,0.8140458,0.0013794928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007128559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01260624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81199783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034463932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007272702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266143053","doi":"10.22145/flr.39.1.6","title":"The Process of Law Reform: Conditions for Success","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Law reform; Law; Politics; Public law; Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Political science; Project commissioning; Publishing","score_opus":0.06468398277748962,"score_gpt":0.38638811212857493,"score_spread":0.32170412935108533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266143053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024487748,0.034414683,0.000015284379,0.0018145805,0.00024365108,0.0010744804,0.00004415818,0.000052350155,0.9620959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99235326,0.0037127372,0.00024396679,0.0015490121,0.00012179948,0.0004342604,0.000007815205,0.000011511732,0.0015656286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989387,0.00011833313,0.00030284555,0.00013458914,0.00023959637,0.00026594903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916464,0.00010272061,0.00017055857,0.0002220995,0.0002636051,0.00007636488],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075032865,0.000084011175,0.00022523326,0.0000051299903,0.0013403447,0.000052442243,0.0004925816,0.00004961453,0.00025827414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015581408,0.000052226602,0.00012072414,0.00012842823,0.00070661097,0.000252269,0.000030711668,0.000075600634,0.00004134734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041984063,0.000019504427,0.000023710547,0.0005186837,0.000010665414,3.4325495e-7,0.0049883407,1.5705949e-8,5.3557307e-7,0.9934213,0.00073012465,0.0002825852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006992446,0.000031436266,0.000013435429,0.0005430364,0.00003236837,3.247758e-7,0.00020910978,4.4455197e-7,0.00009357206,0.031520937,0.967402,0.000083410494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064675272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005043361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9921084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004854095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007886647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266915758","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2251456","title":"Consultation Paper on a Franchise Act for British Columbia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Franchise; Political science; Library science; Law; Public administration; Business; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.007021480444889727,"score_gpt":0.26309752301284217,"score_spread":0.25607604256795247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266915758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9119399,0.004049405,0.0018649629,0.0052605527,0.0013344513,0.001874079,0.000018695606,0.0001832569,0.07347466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9706886,0.00071018137,0.00022888342,0.00046440825,0.0007236092,0.0000645257,0.0000026635287,0.00001995085,0.027097225],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732196,0.00014001198,0.00021296975,0.00017355764,0.00036547642,0.0017859958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999151,0.000227444,0.00013011185,0.000093335635,0.0002600345,0.00013808826],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012545463,0.00007359867,0.00013750009,0.00002724487,0.0009898354,0.0008230677,0.00027751824,0.00010894097,0.0010659543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087265915,0.000101400976,0.000103722065,0.00017427001,0.00013669433,0.0004967464,0.000010781208,0.00083999475,0.0002121785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012867877,0.0005044552,0.017280994,0.000021802902,0.00041126943,0.000011325089,0.07297873,0.00002680755,0.00032075064,0.22333916,0.08516517,0.59981084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015717497,0.00046954126,0.003511916,0.000038145936,0.000033708857,0.000025361422,0.011731944,0.00002547095,0.0000044664534,0.5162262,0.4660693,0.0002922055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032291066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21120206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59951866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007805393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016649573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267108635","doi":"","title":"Book Review of 'The Strange Alchemy of Life and Law' by Albie Sachs","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Alchemy; Courage; Law; Rigour; Democracy; Political science; Economic Justice; Milestone; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Epistemology; Politics; Theology","score_opus":0.014553448383503685,"score_gpt":0.26991443064564796,"score_spread":0.25536098226214426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267108635","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029362303,0.94159544,0.000055650795,0.001578176,0.00010776177,0.00019738633,0.000006337004,0.000009466882,0.053513553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71947294,0.27555344,0.000049409522,0.0019994446,0.000104873216,0.0000023480704,3.0963452e-7,0.000010869162,0.0028063748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810123,0.00022547002,0.00032265004,0.000103262006,0.0003962527,0.0008511551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993006,0.000037822694,0.0003071744,0.00015159513,0.000099734694,0.00010306568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018498843,0.00008586311,0.00023095126,0.000017442151,0.00019172799,0.000009362485,0.00044958663,0.000065837725,0.00048560943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020931156,0.0000618735,0.00010994179,0.00016066743,0.00047363606,0.00017157625,0.000040568102,0.00066796236,0.0000048950556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006428403,0.00024425084,0.0034854487,0.00068958,0.0003988275,0.0000014516802,0.04392815,9.688095e-8,0.00043979555,0.87923706,0.06560923,0.005901801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041174967,0.00019502308,0.00009236686,0.0006412335,0.000118741584,0.000011477494,0.0025961902,5.1407636e-7,0.0006811365,0.03561031,0.95946836,0.00017288554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001025037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066093536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89385915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001535146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012418078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53170824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W22685458","doi":"10.1155/2012/286079","title":"Indigenous Knowledge, Livelihoods and Government Policy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Toxicology","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Livelihood; Geography; Tourism; Wildlife; Wetland; Indigenous; Delta; Resource (disambiguation); Environmental planning; Ecology; Agriculture","score_opus":0.03887373694957096,"score_gpt":0.3401691167171845,"score_spread":0.30129537976761356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W22685458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6167158,0.0035853575,0.00007873159,0.0010139921,0.0010284273,0.00013059248,0.0000031151176,0.000014650671,0.37742934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99500257,0.0003168003,0.0018206285,0.0002653155,0.0008530298,0.0000013430653,2.2960553e-8,0.000006799377,0.0017334974],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989287,0.00021710667,0.0002613109,0.00007807571,0.00024703212,0.00026777643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924207,0.00011251113,0.000263553,0.00007341542,0.00010243927,0.0002060426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072604604,0.00006840409,0.00019194851,0.000079101,0.00017973059,0.00001963925,0.0002803751,0.00013310561,0.00023941412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058715686,0.00005841893,0.000053536885,0.00015311352,0.00029630426,0.00013357727,0.00007946052,0.00020245921,0.000032511227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000902847,0.00049373973,0.025583778,0.00001029022,0.000095840056,0.0001227476,0.90367293,3.849493e-7,0.00041673146,0.033816326,0.0020109727,0.033685986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073205587,0.0015477494,0.05685319,0.000022407574,0.000065560496,0.00009077457,0.012244117,0.00000142122,0.0007457738,0.009946569,0.9175476,0.00020280233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022143277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034278355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9155366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030006666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043081387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26214167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269607816","doi":"","title":"Practice and procedure: Costs on review - What charges are appropriate? Picamore Pty Ltd v Challen [2015] QDC 067","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Context (archaeology); Law; Work (physics); Political science; Civil procedure; Engineering; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.022376873988257537,"score_gpt":0.29229576708758964,"score_spread":0.2699188930993321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269607816","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37439755,0.069337554,0.000112637965,0.39571306,0.0007994624,0.0032584083,0.000053309705,0.0013440663,0.15498397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9512574,0.04344671,0.0021503137,0.00044401534,0.00006948378,0.0000030176852,0.0000049896403,0.000017836737,0.0026062385],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836034,0.0001748646,0.00017243905,0.00048802057,0.00045487392,0.0003494727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838346,0.00009400553,0.0003700067,0.00049506465,0.0004507628,0.00020671776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008717639,0.00018451684,0.00041683548,0.00019109405,0.00029887946,0.0000379561,0.000704103,0.00040448544,0.00007246532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001917729,0.00018512757,0.000057579287,0.0005077047,0.00090839097,0.0006005136,0.00035339454,0.00044177953,0.00018048944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016878356,0.0027502184,0.16824405,0.003256911,0.0010505492,0.0013198891,0.21743268,0.0000066368675,0.00012628184,0.23415889,0.119299196,0.25066686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007303025,0.00013816051,0.00217621,0.0013206815,0.00010599384,0.0000080475165,0.04864346,0.0000034461298,0.0000743021,0.0018403745,0.94467,0.0002889945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005336807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003124785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82537085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021641863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018441427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75492835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270097586","doi":"","title":"Local government alternative dispute resolution: a British Columbian case study","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"ProQuest Dissertations and Theses","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Likert scale; Process (computing); Qualitative research; Thematic analysis; Supervisor; Order (exchange); Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.017823750143306644,"score_gpt":0.33481616930948405,"score_spread":0.3169924191661774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270097586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9005714,0.0017162492,0.000065579225,0.00013227396,0.0005119313,0.0019088587,0.00009028953,0.00015449313,0.094848916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737268,0.00019903627,0.00024405177,0.000032895332,0.0002072006,0.00038130238,0.0001054811,0.00003890829,0.025064344],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737,0.00032217515,0.0004283426,0.00060090615,0.00085977605,0.00041879882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874854,0.00019309156,0.00027363843,0.00025010688,0.00027856143,0.0002560793],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039946704,0.0002776382,0.0003716168,0.000058091056,0.0016723518,0.0008278962,0.00028661836,0.00020457429,0.00010726559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036501334,0.00033434207,0.00008964539,0.00034611003,0.00023435696,0.00038029518,0.000027297676,0.0003316023,0.000017537335],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013659136,0.0019178981,0.0056684,0.00011550417,0.00029976288,0.005782317,0.8706382,0.000016532722,0.000005025509,0.017340068,0.00039281338,0.0976869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005585951,0.0005136653,0.019895399,0.0004201438,0.0003573608,0.00009605795,0.9552746,0.000115886316,0.000031538075,0.003519524,0.01840297,0.00081430085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13580151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71622854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58042705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024546857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023106615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271301890","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1288","title":"The South African Judicial Appointments Process","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Political science; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.013693792431736268,"score_gpt":0.2923582814250808,"score_spread":0.2786644889933445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271301890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029662554,0.0009508623,0.00013824433,0.0026288982,0.0009425271,0.00018652609,0.000006743678,0.00008233461,0.9920976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99371016,0.000026686173,0.00030038253,0.00018114486,0.0028613866,0.000012199536,0.0000011958443,0.000023129442,0.0028837188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972876,0.0003063755,0.00038273426,0.0002068465,0.0010733783,0.0007430938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890745,0.00012625942,0.00029942955,0.00020326939,0.00023079882,0.00023280253],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013391798,0.00015782099,0.00017522443,0.00003605767,0.004809806,0.0007428807,0.00082558923,0.00010842406,0.00018592498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001706585,0.000110876405,0.00012974981,0.00029572,0.00077045604,0.0003164323,0.000057854573,0.00049055886,0.00020336502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038177102,0.00007391509,0.0010964671,0.0000027375681,0.00002947532,0.000043700315,0.031319477,0.000046035515,0.000010924978,0.96385914,0.0023147264,0.0011652368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005649877,0.00007061377,0.00030095823,0.00002804212,0.00004879027,0.000018630237,0.0152418595,0.000017125558,0.00009395128,0.48901144,0.4943128,0.00029081578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026580015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.082257934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9907439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018955512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022021068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99648577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272975401","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4568","title":"Cardboard Boxes and Invisible Fences: Homelessness and Public Space in City of Victoria v. Adams","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Victory; Normative; Sociology; Autonomy; Public space; Economic Justice; Poverty; Law; Meaning (existential); Space (punctuation); Political science; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Politics; History; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.041755369473819644,"score_gpt":0.3374319252273366,"score_spread":0.295676555753517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272975401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9659879,0.0011333956,0.00004451346,0.0016057113,0.00024399176,0.00034437765,0.000012177239,0.00003192107,0.030595966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985236,0.00015936882,0.0007973884,0.0001237389,0.00019449566,0.000006825699,7.190877e-7,0.000009118767,0.00018476803],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834406,0.00013704754,0.00031381263,0.00032067744,0.0005162012,0.0003681967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989474,0.00023933398,0.00016633914,0.00023522401,0.00018371677,0.00022798525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006410831,0.00014144728,0.00040474435,0.00023988161,0.00011524129,0.00018258384,0.00056266115,0.00013940014,0.00004724589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083287887,0.00014073565,0.000030410205,0.0008201886,0.00038689972,0.0007967036,0.00018895374,0.00015542649,0.0000028457932],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022131945,0.0003315279,0.69358236,0.00055477873,0.000051027902,0.000022611492,0.25212523,0.00006330169,0.0013223548,0.042364974,0.00063636946,0.008724169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018390744,0.0005557665,0.86933064,0.0006412317,0.00027712376,0.0000012610817,0.05002697,0.000077638535,0.0031936963,0.0068733576,0.066155195,0.0010280482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004451122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026439177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20209825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005373982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016584808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6728795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273733982","doi":"","title":"Production and marketing - two sides of the same coin : at home with...","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stockfarm","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trademark; Marketing; Product (mathematics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Business; Production (economics); Agricultural science; Agricultural economics; Advertising; Geography; Economics; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01779355398533591,"score_gpt":0.28614989328109286,"score_spread":0.268356339295757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273733982","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95293474,0.0008359884,0.000003334532,0.0011360082,0.00044046537,0.0002631936,0.0000026846421,0.0000307357,0.04435287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99380505,0.000008529806,0.0004008176,0.00003367481,0.00038113052,0.000009848018,2.2589902e-7,0.000007747169,0.005352992],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990481,0.00021700397,0.000095476615,0.00011600023,0.00028969074,0.00023371092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995149,0.000117546864,0.00009318211,0.00016363955,0.000049669045,0.00006107572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010174027,0.00006143284,0.00008942357,0.000018697041,0.00036855246,0.000015922706,0.0001224028,0.000031102314,0.000080314014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005822612,0.000040107127,0.000020693606,0.00020877473,0.0004895183,0.00015357732,0.00009451272,0.00007823242,0.000009008893],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000974285,0.00005069983,0.77956617,0.000038150916,0.000024464674,4.7396398e-7,0.2075942,0.000007968408,0.0016992236,0.005896134,0.0009874813,0.004037591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000677084,0.00010689998,0.51750654,0.0002504682,0.0001349169,0.000014793853,0.032931726,0.0000106893485,0.0060843443,0.0015280466,0.44016808,0.0005863774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006594911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011355345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4391806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000736953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003268906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2834645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274644315","doi":"","title":"Can There Be Legitimate Pluralism in Modes of Protecting Religions and Their Freedom? the Cases of Canada and South Africa","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Politics; Freedom of religion; Supreme court; Multiculturalism; Religious pluralism; Subsidiarity; Secularity; Human rights; Sociology; European union","score_opus":0.025824593168259666,"score_gpt":0.24232780199881923,"score_spread":0.21650320883055957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274644315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98635256,0.0053394334,0.000029293953,0.0010245962,0.000041343894,0.00023218627,0.00001617932,0.000007794893,0.006956632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99920857,0.00047462079,0.00005458226,0.000013618385,0.00004933059,0.0000066450925,1.2566848e-7,0.000009837815,0.0001826916],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982333,0.00025680562,0.00024240409,0.00011394061,0.00021528672,0.00093825883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999327,0.00018186073,0.00022846213,0.000111816335,0.00008289013,0.0000679688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015768898,0.00010163864,0.00018318993,0.00005151711,0.00043739288,0.000023375462,0.00024896482,0.000051312403,0.000007400194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036355775,0.000064677864,0.000031674437,0.00019627062,0.00039425542,0.00009486251,0.000050808736,0.0007767121,4.133641e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060413422,0.000029218594,0.0120062865,0.000015376552,0.00009764918,0.000011936519,0.8441254,0.000038763825,0.00022696731,0.14229836,0.000034264518,0.0010553522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006643893,0.00032271066,0.0013500924,0.00013699471,0.000049051843,0.0001113638,0.76683927,0.00012989252,0.0008623091,0.22797662,0.0012470763,0.000310241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7060722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95387274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24780056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026814177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027614855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48987567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275821254","doi":"","title":"The Legislature Strikes Back: The Effect of Ontario’s Bill 152 on the Beneficiaries of the Statutory Duty of Care in the Peoples Decision","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Legislature; Duty; Duty of care; Law; Business; Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.009495012955705796,"score_gpt":0.28556250511921594,"score_spread":0.2760674921635101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275821254","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3362201,0.43902862,7.2398484e-7,0.038472746,0.0007616728,0.0056214626,0.00005145916,0.000013402051,0.17982982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872412,0.011080193,0.0000097618495,0.0010099395,0.000055528366,0.000028993793,0.0000018703751,0.000009216405,0.00056327047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99598336,0.0019746446,0.00057418563,0.0002197033,0.00093603355,0.0003120825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847951,0.0132964505,0.0004777443,0.0012587073,0.00014393653,0.00002807122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029240747,0.00021666304,0.0005194219,0.000014202094,0.00070745853,0.0000637789,0.0021139206,0.00011631676,0.00010268609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026390108,0.000060668626,0.00036042125,0.0006580419,0.00088581373,0.00010296018,0.00011952447,0.00048324946,0.000009825805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015283516,0.00007814972,0.005560518,0.00055204146,0.00006807722,8.614825e-7,0.3300209,0.000047024147,0.000012026613,0.63264775,0.0049484386,0.025911357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001398706,0.0002862867,0.0039012914,0.0026228998,0.00014157765,4.1954928e-7,0.0031737091,6.422336e-7,0.0001957751,0.0013530533,0.9880811,0.00010339816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1677344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84637374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98313266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011869982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038811556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8378077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277623564","doi":"","title":"Functionaries and functions in extradition proceedings : South African judicial decisions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Yearbook of International Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Imprisonment; Law; Appeal; Life imprisonment; Political science; Girl; Criminology; Economic Justice; Prison; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.018751947081468556,"score_gpt":0.2589453351960249,"score_spread":0.24019338811455637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277623564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10559977,0.0001596297,0.00031492423,0.0010802,0.00063684804,0.00032422828,0.00022075571,0.00011336873,0.8915503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922207,0.0000047231,0.0008727618,0.00007101884,0.0008336162,0.000048556372,0.000024456158,0.000020404099,0.0059037353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979803,0.00004981036,0.00045205062,0.0003722316,0.00081554253,0.000330088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899226,0.00020073973,0.00023987064,0.0001164018,0.0003298758,0.000120874625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044556882,0.00016317074,0.00022664844,0.0002868682,0.00040078707,0.00015774168,0.00030994462,0.00012443063,0.00039823103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004406551,0.00017151966,0.00008976068,0.00047407884,0.0011155657,0.00038494603,0.00008479504,0.00022204003,0.000048588834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012611008,0.00012641879,0.021863807,0.000004959586,0.000033123662,0.00000559614,0.0540108,0.000044443477,0.000085684944,0.92222446,0.0012478015,0.00022680101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018053565,0.00022675234,0.055192124,0.0002016128,0.00010412791,0.0000053371723,0.09383998,0.00020278167,0.00012896149,0.13728766,0.71015817,0.00084712694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048829084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021270334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88662094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002162498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014755283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.738153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278063734","doi":"10.11575/prism/34110","title":"Marc Ribeiro v. Dragons' Den","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.024482587614469548,"score_gpt":0.2513028307785939,"score_spread":0.22682024316412433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278063734","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06846417,0.00054200337,0.028974097,0.002899637,0.00037809924,0.00021756113,6.9445576e-7,0.00015570574,0.89836806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90304637,0.000039245264,0.046036247,0.00008226988,0.000067312154,2.0889992e-7,0.000003623963,0.000010608104,0.050714143],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887145,0.00015805726,0.00007242722,0.00017098857,0.0004730449,0.00025403188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992189,0.00006527816,0.000080222555,0.0002127138,0.00012388719,0.00029902777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044541789,0.00007215066,0.00015367854,0.00008016411,0.00026867216,0.000016906448,0.00054911355,0.0001232047,0.0003772614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019028613,0.00009145299,0.00007411302,0.00023473008,0.00056819984,0.00029959463,0.00018431008,0.00013473471,0.000328109],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015379598,0.00020553928,0.017673519,0.00002407142,0.00010644704,0.00022451027,0.69249266,9.496887e-7,0.00007800901,0.08446731,0.08058361,0.123989575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044590273,0.000037667498,0.0020739674,0.000008625864,0.00003705406,3.7619276e-7,0.00400804,0.0003125409,0.000019555973,0.0043537715,0.9885596,0.0001429083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011856502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002514075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.907976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014138679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025945032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279900960","doi":"","title":"A compliance paradigm shift : financial law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Without Prejudice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treasury; Mandate; Compliance (psychology); Quarter (Canadian coin); Business; Financial services; Paradigm shift; Key (lock); Finance; Accounting; Law; Political science; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.05632751559696221,"score_gpt":0.35113297163190177,"score_spread":0.2948054560349396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279900960","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02978632,0.0028427085,0.0012996442,0.0033704555,0.0019772318,0.00053147326,0.000019495432,0.00046976472,0.9597029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99364895,0.000011198846,0.0015094011,0.0013417848,0.0016105034,0.000041785108,0.0000022085146,0.000019382438,0.0018148042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980269,0.00022717207,0.00020124856,0.00023895569,0.0004966013,0.0008090923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905235,0.00012694846,0.00010290973,0.00033670283,0.000031350268,0.00034972414],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007771572,0.00014622738,0.00021703844,0.000027445896,0.00068788417,0.00009128395,0.00048324835,0.00014612309,0.00033941487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028246315,0.00014842238,0.00006877644,0.00032106446,0.00063477916,0.00069577305,0.00009354437,0.00024207335,0.0013844782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019988556,0.000082153834,0.032911826,0.000010659887,0.000008596223,0.0000025813592,0.117514364,0.0000012593114,0.0000068304234,0.8469933,0.0018821431,0.00056625914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020461391,0.000016848868,0.010593159,0.000032953318,0.000019712488,7.9145985e-7,0.0002687834,0.000004943715,0.000034595043,0.013082382,0.97551143,0.00022976269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039570793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017302835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9736293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108227105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012505299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99939305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2280194287","doi":"","title":"Cornubia Precinct Development : construction and project management","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Civil Engineering = Siviele Ingenieurswese","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Precinct; Geography; Settlement (finance); Industrial zone; Environmental planning; Archaeology; Regional science; Business","score_opus":0.010558697489035169,"score_gpt":0.24774926267672787,"score_spread":0.2371905651876927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2280194287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4978605,0.0037885772,0.070744984,0.00045384764,0.0046380246,0.0026405973,0.000008211697,0.0022657705,0.4175995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97901785,0.000080219266,0.018563723,0.000033240816,0.0002739338,0.00007814716,0.0000033244683,0.000031344065,0.0019182102],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852383,0.00007293973,0.00024012719,0.0003380203,0.00036736744,0.0004577065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993991,0.00010882808,0.00006578968,0.00022247263,0.00005944303,0.00014434771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006522083,0.0001861048,0.0001928651,0.00016490904,0.00029367566,0.00012406269,0.00023345703,0.000097435644,0.00004650631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002850796,0.00019938323,0.000036322454,0.00036518305,0.00013384507,0.00018725445,0.00012311073,0.00017069391,0.00004177602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006634534,0.00022759521,0.021917967,0.0011003219,0.0004936759,0.00006727902,0.32606888,0.0020706642,0.00093856454,0.11624739,0.005030796,0.52577055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026761732,0.00002261797,0.0016413669,0.000085120635,0.000026185222,0.0000032634653,0.0008515672,0.0009757967,0.00023735703,0.00009982496,0.9954742,0.00031507266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000809695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027619823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9904434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014261015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006111369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81306124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282477943","doi":"","title":"The role of pathological gambling in the sentencing of a person convicted of armed robbery : a comparative discussion of the South African, Canadian and Australian jurisdictions : comments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Criminology; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.0816407160527359,"score_gpt":0.3236185034298723,"score_spread":0.2419777873771364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282477943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938197,0.00035455753,0.00003365799,0.0018078992,0.00015904366,0.00029066965,0.00008638993,0.0000031911934,0.0034449066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995081,0.000023620205,0.00028949528,0.000035983758,0.00007923371,0.000003826848,5.9468044e-7,0.0000074864347,0.000051666757],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965027,0.0012142636,0.0008379094,0.00015065834,0.0008875933,0.00040684984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99685836,0.0007612382,0.0013740805,0.0002398734,0.00055185874,0.0002145814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016499641,0.0001653835,0.0005118757,0.00020768949,0.00065151195,0.000022368165,0.000760407,0.00009555252,0.000012975024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010818661,0.00007909324,0.00019067552,0.00084408483,0.0022058028,0.00012387088,0.000064029526,0.0005635029,3.478301e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020334475,0.000089341345,0.02139112,0.00004272308,0.00004360087,0.000017266932,0.9769186,0.00015785354,0.00051028683,0.0004700944,0.000028224935,0.00012758149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042393684,0.00026262668,0.03682496,0.00019632891,0.0005603931,0.000025226445,0.9604743,0.000087912566,0.00026687866,0.00011043023,0.0006768921,0.0000900771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012988135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007614282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016444225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012229236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006835798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99358445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283350547","doi":"","title":"Secrecy is a slippery affair : media freedom","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhodes Journalism Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Officer; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Code (set theory); Political science; Computer security; Computer science; Law; Advertising; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1004118482646366,"score_gpt":0.3460162223802308,"score_spread":0.24560437411559416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283350547","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000858139,0.6472719,0.00045455486,0.009145957,0.0017677802,0.00053167273,0.000020391386,0.00019265551,0.339757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5463589,0.43185508,0.009522985,0.0067130877,0.0020160305,0.000043506,0.0000035056746,0.00005967653,0.0034272613],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968785,0.0007696277,0.0006060522,0.0003050047,0.000834452,0.00060633343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824214,0.00021061809,0.00033064274,0.0004715494,0.00024825463,0.0004968],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002782963,0.00022726406,0.0005715513,0.00008442716,0.00044987205,0.00009873936,0.00096442533,0.00015091522,0.014776125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013327309,0.00018507097,0.00033833346,0.00064374873,0.00037316245,0.00050786394,0.00011479001,0.0004536014,0.0012943601],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019489346,0.00023573262,0.0029742674,0.0012760437,0.00018626201,0.00027066728,0.55348945,1.233083e-7,0.000018939769,0.2245503,0.14588873,0.07109001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014339037,0.000018806177,0.00014440317,0.0026200567,0.00013773004,0.000017231969,0.0013514869,0.0000017338112,0.000020809062,0.0123081645,0.98295146,0.00028473942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006676783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019974832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8370627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012495751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023348804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283663779","doi":"","title":"'n Taalwet vir Suid-Afrika? Die rol van sosiolinguistiese beginsels by die ontleding van taalwetgewing","year":2010,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Litnet Akademies : 'n Joernaal vir die Geesteswetenskappe, Natuurwetenskappe, Regte en Godsdienswetenskappe","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01176054951707885,"score_gpt":0.28483201059101904,"score_spread":0.2730714610739402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283663779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62104934,0.096764304,0.00065451587,0.01462576,0.04975853,0.012401572,0.009610531,0.0077482522,0.18738717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8285808,0.00863901,0.005247772,0.0024703466,0.020569237,0.00083404116,0.0018357032,0.0022707551,0.12955235],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9481273,0.0048863017,0.009807746,0.011145814,0.009386551,0.01664627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9642639,0.008578215,0.0066992384,0.008869356,0.0043843533,0.0072049196],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012934918,0.009175988,0.0094193,0.0030491431,0.009214122,0.004667456,0.012703424,0.009985958,0.0020978672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017726496,0.009692935,0.0047928584,0.005190805,0.011501991,0.0045058657,0.0063797305,0.020673504,0.008414065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007419582,0.009401039,0.069010824,0.0052278196,0.0117203565,0.010471408,0.3552255,0.0020222901,0.1457689,0.033022676,0.27407628,0.07663333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007249034,0.001890735,0.003285343,0.0021448787,0.002666777,0.0002653598,0.014311238,0.0032120256,0.0057439925,0.010562193,0.9370075,0.011660926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070702075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007295386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6629312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035054057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029488301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284783134","doi":"","title":"The role of international human rights law in the development of South Africa's legislation on juvenile justice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Democracy & Development","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Juvenile; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Juvenile court; Juvenile delinquency; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.02345015306475036,"score_gpt":0.29988317915099194,"score_spread":0.2764330260862416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284783134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1624939,0.00017872296,0.000104567174,0.0008180602,0.00042824418,0.0004547862,0.000003215443,0.000036465197,0.83548206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944641,0.000004739208,0.0040500476,0.00008683903,0.00011775056,0.000048926537,0.000009324186,0.000009964879,0.0012083123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972324,0.00024381795,0.0007486339,0.0002439575,0.0011649322,0.00036627235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987629,0.00039424704,0.00033693528,0.0002647851,0.00018359227,0.00005755604],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018118873,0.00015455789,0.00018934015,0.000064801905,0.0017453472,0.00008197439,0.00095751666,0.00008669573,0.000080643134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008471044,0.000101965124,0.000050349965,0.00036345335,0.00038445092,0.00018150556,0.00011079847,0.00019661174,0.000055012133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028477196,0.00013004681,0.0013712813,0.000004020061,0.0000292928,0.0000030101178,0.3588284,0.000022511165,0.000057045687,0.6374745,0.00007872956,0.001972718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025689087,0.000016672902,0.0035941952,0.000047510344,0.000014751851,3.352412e-7,0.009437337,0.000011343692,0.0019619178,0.024269344,0.9602434,0.00014627451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069612666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014494343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9601647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025530983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021049098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285540011","doi":"","title":"Compensating the Harms of Sexual and Domestic Violence: Tort Law, Insurance and the Role of the State","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Compensation (psychology); Harm; Liability; Government (linguistics); Business; Domestic violence; Damages; Actuarial science; Liability insurance; Law; Political science; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Psychology; Social psychology; Environmental health; Medicine","score_opus":0.00484831343702776,"score_gpt":0.25742322859302746,"score_spread":0.2525749151559997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285540011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98213416,0.014314413,0.00007450983,0.0010838376,0.0000904536,0.00019229316,0.000003379564,0.0000061534633,0.0021007832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99783796,0.0018661501,0.000028871367,0.00007627774,0.00009189999,0.000002516131,5.675465e-8,0.0000063033945,0.00008998783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828565,0.00030244837,0.00024082328,0.00009956401,0.00039664755,0.00067485723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992174,0.00024926307,0.00026933043,0.0001420917,0.000084480715,0.000037437414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029219424,0.00008058288,0.00015464732,0.000013320877,0.00070356566,0.000051138322,0.00043326162,0.000032760243,0.0000026455875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023984855,0.000037659156,0.000034499626,0.00018059196,0.0017689696,0.00011834232,0.00007833957,0.0007900073,5.4174484e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007969168,0.000026893216,0.014841613,0.0000092184455,0.00008081242,5.790104e-7,0.11717009,0.00027905422,0.00050825486,0.8511609,8.9087393e-7,0.015842034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011469015,0.00012598754,0.0040186197,0.00007045616,0.00004725344,0.00005082685,0.049743842,0.000039798077,0.0002786425,0.9434965,0.000887041,0.0000941159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004311853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004307248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09233565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014033163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084712415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6518261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288676574","doi":"","title":"Aboriginal land rights in Australia remains an unruly horse : aantekeninge","year":2009,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Tydskrif vir die suid-afrikaanse reg","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Colonisation; Resistance (ecology); Legislation; Treaty; Law; Political science; Indigenous rights; Psyche; Land reform; History; Ethnology; Human rights; Archaeology; Agriculture; Ecology","score_opus":0.03160331132602916,"score_gpt":0.3776349469851022,"score_spread":0.346031635659073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288676574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90345025,0.0023722423,0.00005512857,0.0026939223,0.0018557145,0.0011020096,0.00017304598,0.0004494665,0.0878482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97210467,0.00030679195,0.0017556559,0.00023432217,0.0026206153,0.00003359776,0.00007845115,0.000076058794,0.022789823],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901949,0.0015854657,0.0015494687,0.0018627921,0.0019329132,0.0028744242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996123,0.00026349587,0.0005530015,0.0015606802,0.00033110063,0.0011687175],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026036396,0.001147098,0.001382119,0.00065577845,0.001101591,0.00068836147,0.0018877359,0.0011731848,0.00081854156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013533344,0.0011055149,0.00043111158,0.0021526979,0.0012932676,0.0016686834,0.000077638746,0.001628318,0.001708927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002104696,0.005574604,0.080599695,0.0002900395,0.00033764227,0.0075362353,0.7127769,0.00036280885,0.002728201,0.16340944,0.02052541,0.00375436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022097959,0.0011000104,0.024376268,0.0004888476,0.00019101563,0.0000148532035,0.0020692248,0.000118409895,0.0005041603,0.016574547,0.9505022,0.0018506566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04429126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.078776315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9299768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009018887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005718096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290727734","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2273251","title":"Putting the Train of Environmental Protection on Tracks: Nova Scotia's Experiment in Using Law to Strengthen Environmental Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Law; Environmental law; Political science; Engineering; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02211417667440575,"score_gpt":0.2738297278406412,"score_spread":0.25171555116623545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290727734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929712,0.0005489137,0.00016016849,0.0010232077,0.00016821311,0.0008023324,0.000004656776,0.000012983621,0.004308318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991356,0.00003910212,0.00024117547,0.00014065839,0.00025683243,0.0000151534905,6.8547115e-7,0.000022154714,0.0001486224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702346,0.00036913887,0.00036984362,0.00022493167,0.00061496283,0.0013976739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994889,0.000056567093,0.00018455113,0.00016058044,0.000006109706,0.000103308965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016464572,0.00015944614,0.0001698689,0.00006814998,0.000450698,0.00008879356,0.00037359892,0.00009003755,0.0003728315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027661452,0.00012758633,0.00009237492,0.00013302205,0.00035013436,0.0003274338,0.000049858118,0.0010340678,0.00008612787],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015570625,0.0018696605,0.0019989,0.000009886277,0.00023831491,0.000009820604,0.33022624,0.0035445665,0.16260733,0.39053255,0.00001721238,0.10878981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0059530376,0.0051484182,0.004300055,0.00046521152,0.00017091118,0.00018393605,0.7373742,0.0022216225,0.048805654,0.15541531,0.037798185,0.0021635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009277685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071905185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4071479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025993213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001952778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99731964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291826599","doi":"","title":"Fluitjieblasers - is dit die huidige regering se erns?","year":2005,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Journal of South African Law / Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Dismissal; Honour; Political science; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.03097142147707586,"score_gpt":0.3028394684097316,"score_spread":0.2718680469326557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291826599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49967578,0.068789035,0.0007996178,0.029041843,0.01002757,0.002532077,0.0015484276,0.0007792516,0.3868064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95993114,0.0016013327,0.0029577054,0.0015255918,0.009963603,0.000028490202,0.000012752532,0.00035737586,0.023622032],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98353237,0.0014596231,0.0043841703,0.0016659207,0.004964954,0.003992944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98830175,0.0010771761,0.0042367503,0.0018991928,0.0016311072,0.0028540005],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053562596,0.0018058091,0.0028845437,0.0008947978,0.0023173657,0.0014235016,0.003749037,0.0012888188,0.0017236412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012842491,0.0016995281,0.0023252976,0.001960293,0.0035511015,0.0031119615,0.00073225226,0.003087358,0.0021781214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021655527,0.002190724,0.0036900002,0.0005928428,0.0025778583,0.0030682718,0.90828884,0.0013838201,0.002280548,0.0143870665,0.049492694,0.009881793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027498445,0.0008948924,0.00023544992,0.0008926293,0.0010699703,0.00006608429,0.040681664,0.00015789337,0.0034368767,0.0008968864,0.9469474,0.0019704008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036207875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018729682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89745474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002483508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015901749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292627550","doi":"10.14288/1.0101865","title":"An examination of the use of the injunction in labour management disputes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Labour economics; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.026567003586823117,"score_gpt":0.20259171015498867,"score_spread":0.17602470656816555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292627550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931711,0.00001565633,0.000049181832,0.000038463197,0.00015700553,0.00023616504,0.000027592907,0.000010642975,0.006294216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983155,0.000024663577,0.0003444765,0.000012597853,0.00000819071,2.9107582e-7,7.2880295e-7,0.0000031409104,0.0012904257],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991418,0.00025435677,0.00008770865,0.00012435,0.00029052893,0.00010121436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943995,0.000026105146,0.00015183722,0.00023879287,0.00011776685,0.000025537029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031900892,0.000018535497,0.000090444184,0.000026662952,0.00017136509,0.0000212416,0.00046554615,0.000054973538,0.00007198225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005281633,0.00004116157,0.000051352585,0.0005178872,0.00054806663,0.00042931398,0.00012643494,0.000061793486,0.0000011984415],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011520665,0.00042026234,0.4250199,0.00008443637,0.000030554667,0.0000084705025,0.09840276,0.000018557213,0.00010886085,0.0009868251,0.00033339811,0.47457448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018100056,0.000020638856,0.98597115,0.0000704134,0.000017003793,1.7119113e-7,0.012182024,0.000022794322,0.0000042462107,0.00040570225,0.0010824967,0.0000423789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3091285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51866204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56095123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006233473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028706558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6954721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293281345","doi":"","title":"DEAL: : Hudbay/Augusta sets Canadian poison pill precedent.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International financial law review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Pill; Law; Business; Stock (firearms); Finance; Economics; Political science; History; Archaeology; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.018935859695237457,"score_gpt":0.33291499343366476,"score_spread":0.3139791337384273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293281345","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005964669,0.012343425,0.00008218587,0.018474812,0.0024439306,0.0005448031,0.00007797958,0.00010939644,0.965327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97558707,0.0051129013,0.00078614685,0.011029846,0.001351613,0.000068095,0.000057430414,0.000027577504,0.0059793447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796647,0.00023839563,0.00037161048,0.00031121317,0.0006628442,0.00044945168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883485,0.00011879617,0.00014245136,0.0002395882,0.00032278465,0.00034150542],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010213582,0.00015635,0.00027367953,0.00006325365,0.00040034213,0.000117874115,0.0009044325,0.00012353392,0.001773008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016262345,0.00015676719,0.00014016447,0.0002560627,0.00019190524,0.00031396866,0.000074679825,0.00020388671,0.0011355799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025919228,0.000015592404,0.00045046606,0.00006762258,0.000008513769,0.000007452878,0.00090912724,7.035647e-7,8.95612e-7,0.9452116,0.0316245,0.021700947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000913094,0.000017882612,0.00058774516,0.0006502826,0.000018221494,0.0000015646234,0.000011608365,0.000006202884,0.0000049613554,0.005850432,0.99257535,0.00018446319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31786883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54827356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9749906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046323583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004899302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298454046","doi":"","title":"MAGAZINER, DANIEL R. – The Law and the Prophets: Black Consciousness in South Africa, 1968-1977","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Histoire sociale","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consciousness; Law; History; Legal consciousness; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.019627245885040535,"score_gpt":0.2582624003071181,"score_spread":0.23863515442207758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298454046","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022666657,0.013613514,0.000021428861,0.011867055,0.001537968,0.001055213,0.0000218855,0.00013438254,0.9490819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96633816,0.000028235343,0.00007025011,0.0008010554,0.0007683363,0.00007217297,0.0000013732824,0.000022269825,0.03189814],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976669,0.0006991712,0.00026129794,0.00022752705,0.0004944108,0.0006506736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989065,0.00041598326,0.00015259777,0.00031439768,0.0000822591,0.00012829057],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001872078,0.00016524276,0.0002698092,0.000030897696,0.0020480442,0.00012765327,0.0005181331,0.00016498925,0.000097211436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000489099,0.000103690305,0.00009178955,0.00045119927,0.0086072525,0.0002641837,0.00015565622,0.00034432003,0.00016320877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022896429,0.00004389758,0.0010754322,0.0000075704143,0.000009011879,0.0000020409962,0.6867076,6.2417115e-7,0.0000069362195,0.30563012,0.0060773273,0.00041651982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071866286,0.000007403175,0.00021147454,0.000010954304,0.000033931796,4.2327434e-7,0.055537887,0.0000083194145,0.0000032108967,0.0049407505,0.93834823,0.00017877352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030118183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053991615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9436715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002795197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001921677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301857310","doi":"","title":"Legal Perspectives on Bullying","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Teacher: The National Education Magazine","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Context (archaeology); Statutory law; Duty; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Duty of care; Criminology; Sociology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.024739374411755076,"score_gpt":0.3539250215638901,"score_spread":0.32918564715213505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301857310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03730688,0.0006189799,0.00004526228,0.0306362,0.0005146188,0.00024849002,0.0000054977786,0.00013030926,0.9304938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86291814,0.000008806779,0.00057918567,0.00059319305,0.0033482949,0.00004856174,0.000014497376,0.000011829867,0.13247749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830705,0.00023245165,0.00017162708,0.00022152567,0.0008601937,0.00020712576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990387,0.00022524982,0.00010086853,0.00012661147,0.00045761582,0.00005096979],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010598933,0.000101890815,0.00007833126,0.00010618862,0.0006888696,0.00015860515,0.00033528023,0.00006608264,0.0013090636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010734823,0.00008194504,0.000057855905,0.00042032578,0.00028348193,0.00023130163,0.000022416683,0.00024235231,0.0012225142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008089585,0.00031821543,0.0006561597,0.0000013998101,0.0000073637398,1.557186e-7,0.03689478,0.000086103435,0.000091625014,0.82936245,0.13149577,0.0010778666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000102222,0.000012635579,0.0073303906,0.0000065596437,0.000007900752,8.123925e-7,0.0119159175,0.000031789124,0.000017746212,0.014126071,0.96633506,0.00011291365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010399638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015622628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8348393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057038234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007625086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2302058315","doi":"10.55016/ojs/sppp.v9i1.42564","title":"The False Panacea of City Charters? A Political Perspective on the Case of Toronto","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The School of Public Policy Publications","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Panacea (medicine); Perspective (graphical); Politics; Political science; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Medicine; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05650911666329846,"score_gpt":0.3820222489531011,"score_spread":0.32551313228980266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2302058315","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053034034,0.00036560502,0.00011894103,0.5575776,0.0000992559,0.0006573313,0.00025306924,0.00006046833,0.3878337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945049,0.000058375605,0.000035235676,0.00045725697,0.0004222057,0.000110535926,7.796889e-7,0.00001248436,0.0043981853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705976,0.0010353622,0.00047143133,0.00022355783,0.00056580687,0.0006441062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935735,0.0029319609,0.0004239391,0.0014164031,0.0012981187,0.00035608612],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031479108,0.00013779064,0.00021710215,0.000099892306,0.0009750828,0.00012860628,0.0017444259,0.00009978161,0.0007445574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02466436,0.000059745198,0.00018989609,0.00081280986,0.0033148692,0.0005772146,0.00020224188,0.00018557697,0.000045542816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067956626,0.00009680655,0.0005390772,0.0000017272102,0.00006568273,2.4148977e-7,0.014978482,4.2656346e-8,0.00007851721,0.9777226,0.0056899204,0.0008201116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080520776,0.00024645182,0.02304739,0.000050881048,0.000115962175,0.00001904928,0.19872048,0.000016067877,0.00065997586,0.3683019,0.4076391,0.0003775294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.110028826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016977768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9414709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085933553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015896752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2309789829","doi":"","title":"Solidarity, Unconscionability, and Enforcement of Union Fines: Birch v. Union of Taxation Employees, Local 70030","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Enforcement; Law; Context (archaeology); Appeal; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.009316116154295692,"score_gpt":0.29197513476173365,"score_spread":0.282659018607438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2309789829","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98114395,0.00083218917,0.009687983,0.0011678633,0.0005324787,0.0002791035,0.0000071858967,0.000027506525,0.0063217334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985178,0.00061376736,0.0002141048,0.0000107682245,0.00021086342,0.0000028452762,0.0000037678135,0.000010954262,0.00041513503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740785,0.00038174036,0.0004447747,0.00017344808,0.00062560005,0.00096658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986741,0.00013626427,0.0005179269,0.00018198072,0.00037594853,0.00011380389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005615996,0.00011731986,0.00022608461,0.00014355347,0.00031023155,0.000035655117,0.00032188627,0.00016438866,0.00014411123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062512496,0.00010621219,0.00007485971,0.0003535186,0.000791637,0.00026868045,0.000088508365,0.0011625297,0.0000029412647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035149063,0.0001547927,0.051688265,0.00002467041,0.0000537545,5.272204e-7,0.013209303,0.000043963548,0.001346748,0.9084195,0.000040064024,0.024983246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013927878,0.001130601,0.0046931324,0.00006695991,0.00009217652,0.000031123167,0.019095609,0.00017494858,0.0020772384,0.93357354,0.037299264,0.00037261847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008100112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046901204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046995133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043386238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027677114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99850506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314409218","doi":"10.7202/1027106ar","title":"Denys-Claude Lamontagne, Jean Brisset des Nos, Le droit minier, 2 édition, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2005, 133 pages, ISBN 2-89400-203-3 Pierre Noreau, Le droit en partage : le monde juridique face à la diversité ethnoculturelle, Montréal, Éditions Thémis, 2003, 270 pages, ISBN 2-89400-178-9 Hubert Reid, Dictionnaire de droit québécois et canadien, 3 édition, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2004, 828 pages, ISBN 2-89127-682-3","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The Wilson Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.010431824984772829,"score_gpt":0.22607276224615724,"score_spread":0.21564093726138442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314409218","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10635689,0.62532943,0.015692383,0.11310247,0.0044595245,0.0084644295,0.021873493,0.003934616,0.10078678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3103339,0.24959756,0.008059733,0.002151456,0.0046864836,0.0015289662,0.013936192,0.0011352221,0.4085705],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9796358,0.0035016583,0.0036235524,0.0043232,0.0027446991,0.0061710943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870605,0.0015565756,0.0024713213,0.00373233,0.0018597615,0.0033195028],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038292324,0.0028202336,0.003213172,0.0010810792,0.0074116522,0.0016806357,0.003591796,0.0037794388,0.0010368588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022888132,0.00417819,0.0017776274,0.0048332517,0.0037276598,0.0048301877,0.00088209286,0.004584308,0.0013118266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031980497,0.0029997563,0.0036895054,0.000741141,0.00090401666,0.0022333735,0.024951786,0.009408879,0.0006380682,0.037519924,0.91402346,0.0025702824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004317881,0.000341521,0.0099643795,0.0018426606,0.0014271127,0.0008267043,0.010146464,0.00093932444,0.0004380758,0.032647386,0.93280107,0.0043074004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8729218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95401496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37573186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008506815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005173161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323710659","doi":"","title":"National Credit Act 34 of 2005: The Confusion Continues","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Confusion; Business; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law and economics; Credit card; Consumer protection; Credit card interest; Law; Finance; Political science; Economics; Commerce; Payment","score_opus":0.015980664395296117,"score_gpt":0.3125420838990526,"score_spread":0.2965614195037565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323710659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35171202,0.042320322,0.0013127332,0.016376812,0.0037472162,0.00057360076,0.00001821223,0.00010556837,0.5838335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98834205,0.0012102275,0.00005775132,0.00009576729,0.0023880876,0.0000026411692,0.0000010283719,0.000008948554,0.007893501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968069,0.00028530872,0.00022777801,0.00007511388,0.0008407271,0.0017641353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991184,0.00021619041,0.00022874512,0.000088224086,0.0002430475,0.00010538999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062009417,0.0000817833,0.00012379263,0.00005284135,0.000562264,0.000048992642,0.00044104908,0.000080325895,0.00037801743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006810108,0.00005600984,0.000096841446,0.00016810469,0.0002995626,0.00036285908,0.0000393207,0.0009474104,0.00006662413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034358745,0.000088156514,0.010172541,0.0000018006418,0.00009431587,3.4937796e-7,0.029488018,0.0000046907944,0.00022286444,0.9495701,0.006552173,0.0037705933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033083642,0.000068204296,0.0016180403,0.000012604069,0.00003206031,0.000021171356,0.0144301895,0.000007635281,0.00013800892,0.0797206,0.90349454,0.00012610936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032482183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010816711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8969424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076075667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026243636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46555084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325644776","doi":"","title":"Legislating Tolerance: Article 976 of the Civil Code of Quebec and its Application to Mixed-Income and Mixed-Use City Redevelopment Projects","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Redevelopment; Principle of legality; Hegemony; Political science; Subaltern; Sociology; Sustainability; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.02034303813196567,"score_gpt":0.27514719138808386,"score_spread":0.25480415325611816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2325644776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933431,0.00022091449,0.00018093735,0.001112216,0.0001470467,0.00067496113,0.000022526057,0.000040485073,0.004257774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972053,0.00001553885,0.0010651337,0.000090525435,0.00008046542,0.000054325035,3.1079506e-7,0.000010288972,0.0014781188],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847466,0.00017264104,0.00033506888,0.00029807055,0.00043911103,0.00028044684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893457,0.00023035008,0.00019823013,0.00029338888,0.00017699109,0.00016646524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074472063,0.00011477156,0.0002097373,0.000030413477,0.00029750643,0.0000579689,0.00027480655,0.000086628046,0.000027783153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008158555,0.000078124576,0.000032363372,0.0003495575,0.000323524,0.0003430459,0.00021038346,0.00009222199,0.000010200972],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012866527,0.00015331853,0.5704058,0.00017222471,0.00006607229,0.0000023681357,0.09331109,0.00003287058,0.09310072,0.2218826,0.0008312228,0.01991309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002174102,0.00015784185,0.5137401,0.0011869281,0.000072730036,0.0000024677438,0.0041641155,0.00015251113,0.2675748,0.0059992922,0.20386097,0.00091414875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012137051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09148694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2158833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010761509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015970273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327383966","doi":"10.1002/iir.1244","title":"Is the Unequal Treatment of Debtors in Natural Person Insolvency Law Justifiable?: A South African Exposition","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Debtor; Statutory law; Creditor; Legislature; Debt; Economics; Promotion (chess); Constitution; Asset (computer security); Business; Law; Law and economics; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.06275054775297945,"score_gpt":0.35479495410023204,"score_spread":0.2920444063472526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327383966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10497049,0.35982543,0.0002646376,0.093930505,0.0066469247,0.0043381844,0.00051728863,0.0002505693,0.42925596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813219,0.01553819,0.00016610062,0.0006801946,0.0002739247,0.00012891118,0.000007904012,0.000013890323,0.0018690325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978761,0.00029444354,0.00050936284,0.0003191893,0.00069898774,0.0003019361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988332,0.000264115,0.000305885,0.00029412017,0.00022694177,0.000075763885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053117523,0.00018439635,0.00032718654,0.000089759444,0.00016317739,0.000037135113,0.00063439,0.000075493095,0.0007951521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032603877,0.00010491769,0.00023924284,0.0004147853,0.00040339207,0.00036042908,0.000041066563,0.00009864439,0.00011680858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016045784,0.0012064286,0.014571291,0.00058936974,0.00037460358,0.000054325952,0.37868366,0.0000055761648,0.00079737237,0.45377347,0.0038235283,0.14595994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081729965,0.00024564107,0.0013006959,0.003880649,0.00012206399,0.0000023160087,0.0034761606,0.00002618864,0.0003870913,0.0019315608,0.9874465,0.00036384104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034125505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081972865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98362297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006320916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014873195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8706358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W232812854","doi":"","title":"FRUITS OF DEMOCRATIC TRANSFORMATION OF EDUCATION IN A SOUTH AFRICAN UNIVERSITY IN 1998: PERSPECTIVES OF STUDENTS IN THE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION, UNIVERSITY OF CAPETOWN","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Democracy; Witness; Humanities; Sociology; Political science; History; Politics; Art; Law","score_opus":0.07558711411738922,"score_gpt":0.3701898814563409,"score_spread":0.2946027673389517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W232812854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885291,0.00032638182,0.0001150124,0.0007353986,0.00029901217,0.00041898832,0.00002485269,0.000002959934,0.0095482925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953894,0.0002267811,0.004175456,0.000032698368,0.000031275016,0.0000020715263,0.0000025340923,0.000005448518,0.0001343305],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972812,0.00078126136,0.0008602508,0.00019713619,0.00065243617,0.00022773567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99679273,0.00024959163,0.0015944502,0.00021381136,0.0010346294,0.00011476422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031364625,0.00012458237,0.0003657314,0.0012285947,0.00025707658,0.000012141984,0.0010569484,0.00010379561,0.000038392587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010377859,0.00012664184,0.00011627178,0.0029971742,0.0010325505,0.0009373193,0.000029425333,0.00022108872,0.0000011265033],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009549455,0.0032395625,0.11007353,0.0002757424,0.000023248373,6.2622104e-7,0.84827584,0.0032536674,0.0007871513,0.032093305,0.00003569724,0.0018461511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005207912,0.00021472655,0.16665329,0.0007875584,0.000062773484,0.000008213115,0.8205692,0.000024209401,0.00084720604,0.009316697,0.00087199383,0.00012332962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009050371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006351424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056579765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021451423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006517283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329467884","doi":"10.7202/1027184ar","title":"Nicole Duplé, Droit constitutionnel : principes généraux, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2004, 603 pages, ISBN 2-89127-659-0 Patricia Hughes, Patrich A. Molinari (eds.), Participatory Justice in a Global Economy: the New Rule of Law / Justice et participation dans un monde global : la nouvelle règle de droit, Montréal, Éditions Thémis, 2004, 519 pages, ISBN 2-89400-195-9","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Citizen journalism; Economic Justice; Political science; Cartography; Law; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02170954771568927,"score_gpt":0.2837692787371545,"score_spread":0.26205973102146524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329467884","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34684289,0.33427584,0.030838681,0.065007195,0.0038000804,0.0065428135,0.0070005036,0.0011206046,0.20457141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95796317,0.021659948,0.005991522,0.0018235986,0.002029104,0.0004927763,0.000308786,0.00013274617,0.009598324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98920715,0.0022853499,0.0026562316,0.0017093851,0.0010808965,0.003060981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993237,0.0013706923,0.0015657125,0.0018399828,0.00054662256,0.0014399948],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034515858,0.0010323839,0.0015999657,0.00021657036,0.0018072914,0.0005143607,0.0018977708,0.0013896396,0.00053039036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016911062,0.001389601,0.0007111792,0.0030648557,0.0020893705,0.0018230599,0.00056232215,0.001518456,0.0005897255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005352543,0.005119812,0.015062761,0.0012541116,0.00067446183,0.0006534041,0.054271955,0.19833781,0.0000981102,0.6141778,0.09353058,0.016283935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005723738,0.0004242453,0.0120683685,0.0011599358,0.00669555,0.00028281787,0.012033947,0.02703224,0.00027545725,0.1489772,0.78230995,0.003016541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.073865436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11281821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68877935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006359862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032768932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337616990","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1395","title":"Book Review: Charter Conflicts. What is Parliament's Role?, by Janet L. Hiebert","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01055225528877959,"score_gpt":0.2842486700797144,"score_spread":0.2736964147909348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337616990","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000027884555,0.54373217,0.000044640245,0.037199926,0.0007842365,0.00029883542,0.000015747068,0.00006550575,0.41783103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18741657,0.5026278,0.0009122496,0.26597428,0.0024824126,0.00005198002,0.000024167317,0.00010450564,0.040405996],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679536,0.00026965534,0.00056408835,0.00036116966,0.001170179,0.0008395325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838257,0.00005569626,0.00034470813,0.00037188682,0.0002060295,0.00063908694],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010153454,0.00027636974,0.00043089886,0.00004030863,0.0011554643,0.0009614712,0.00079285377,0.00020393453,0.0077742506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062600775,0.00024537204,0.00022901292,0.00018493073,0.00046700888,0.0021271314,0.000077852565,0.00068313174,0.0013614278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025068808,0.00021115536,0.000050750623,0.000068462025,0.0001315394,0.00012598485,0.055181712,0.0000044306375,0.00016563268,0.055639584,0.8820695,0.0063261525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059035677,0.00006988149,0.0000029850873,0.0008224036,0.0000648703,0.000037789654,0.001238691,9.2916446e-7,0.00039809686,0.0060135117,0.9904506,0.00030988976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013170982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003443153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37742504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035139162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014250923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340695936","doi":"10.14288/1.0091101","title":"A critical engagement with Nancy Fraser’s theory of bivalent justice : implications for the BC Treaty Commission process","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Political science; Commission; Law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.027569242327750994,"score_gpt":0.2864396203832246,"score_spread":0.25887037805547364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340695936","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8742677,0.0017022616,0.03148692,0.010719533,0.00026146733,0.0026933022,0.00062864844,0.00022374756,0.0780164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979746,0.00007658097,0.0009671048,0.000054926713,0.000041234784,0.00000338161,0.0000037448358,0.000006006696,0.00087246636],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899745,0.0001641121,0.00010797047,0.00022915899,0.00026975802,0.00023153052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984276,0.0006291149,0.000102202415,0.00026214903,0.00046791066,0.000111003785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005761125,0.00003817957,0.00016805473,0.00002159237,0.001203913,0.00006442287,0.00051966874,0.00007132696,0.00009134807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040390814,0.000080964805,0.00007971474,0.00032266846,0.00079063757,0.00023787541,0.0000419033,0.00011294221,0.0000023052148],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001632639,0.0011254438,0.010529487,0.00034886505,0.000094654664,0.000019186198,0.05991584,0.00002927303,0.00006169027,0.010371046,0.0064304154,0.91091084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008660238,0.0002890995,0.9180935,0.0002193045,0.00038777423,0.000001602291,0.057041217,0.00003558897,0.0000024732028,0.012830524,0.010063656,0.00016920592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012998526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035654966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9107416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006594772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018442993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343937585","doi":"","title":"Modernizing Pakistan's Blasphemy Law as Hate Speech","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blasphemy; Free speech; Political science; Law; First amendment; Supreme court","score_opus":0.021426760810418694,"score_gpt":0.3077349810378278,"score_spread":0.2863082202274091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343937585","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06478116,0.00077302125,0.00034614437,0.003885052,0.0010002776,0.0004090261,0.000031628544,0.0005862647,0.92818743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94076437,0.000053667158,0.002411883,0.0017392142,0.0010007881,0.000029214016,0.0000021854762,0.00005086275,0.053947844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996785,0.00029226704,0.00038977046,0.00060151855,0.0009828289,0.00094860187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981066,0.0003029387,0.00015279742,0.00065555255,0.00018313384,0.0005989493],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009372619,0.00026441962,0.00031603323,0.000038953087,0.000985271,0.00038408083,0.00089092384,0.0002580916,0.0035722607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041829707,0.00020836585,0.00015697061,0.000304995,0.001036886,0.0010056444,0.00021155985,0.00029758952,0.009624955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033285924,0.000048777907,0.0006111146,0.000010219154,0.00003211834,0.00008485501,0.009326442,0.000003095489,0.0012581816,0.98283017,0.002440712,0.003321032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049202767,0.000038991715,0.000028946528,0.00008290466,0.000020728343,0.0000022242968,0.0009925914,0.000004384524,0.0047147498,0.05797234,0.93527406,0.00037603016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02532526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0133341225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9328334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003699096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017902034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344652708","doi":"","title":"Costs in Statutory Derivative Actions: The Lingering Ghost of Wallersteiner","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Appeal; Derivative (finance); Discretion; Law; Action (physics); Shareholder; High Court; Covariant derivative; Common law; Companies Act; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Corporate law; Economics; Finance; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04458498226051166,"score_gpt":0.33994094728553076,"score_spread":0.2953559650250191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344652708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8560127,0.019601598,0.0017847889,0.0060366136,0.0012832596,0.00048019653,0.0000031548263,0.00006295548,0.114734754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966969,0.0010952688,0.000085768435,0.00004483804,0.000312661,0.0000047761464,3.1875626e-7,0.000010381543,0.0017490687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770945,0.00032699457,0.00023818458,0.00010234647,0.00044434215,0.001178675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992829,0.00015299785,0.00017247123,0.00011783559,0.00018304745,0.0000907408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035641026,0.00008023978,0.00013049397,0.00009221958,0.00024829555,0.000046319168,0.00038024553,0.0000642955,0.000018129562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008111878,0.00005946509,0.00005204839,0.0004148043,0.00023790482,0.00028213297,0.000041428673,0.0013031998,0.000016742908],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001568807,0.0001505341,0.012529619,0.0000046857663,0.00019144808,0.000010067844,0.44595912,0.0005520554,0.00029113525,0.5182098,0.0005101082,0.021434527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014022709,0.00038035537,0.0009137405,0.000086879794,0.000036881745,0.000021764223,0.5482649,0.00008645887,0.00023840052,0.12083614,0.3273946,0.00033757664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025951243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015663804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39737368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027103547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040304293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8740771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346395395","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i1.4518","title":"THE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHT TO HOUSING &amp; THE CANADIAN CHARTER: A CASE COMMENT ON TANUDJAJA V. CANADA (ATTORNEY GENERAL)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Human rights; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Covenant; Cultural rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.08000862500583227,"score_gpt":0.36071883352819145,"score_spread":0.2807102085223592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346395395","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3650759,0.00013003092,0.00003673479,0.22676848,0.0047934805,0.0013903412,0.00016742178,0.00005876225,0.40157884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977251,0.0000015634224,0.00016329557,0.017399082,0.0011713677,0.00003549747,0.000004099251,0.000018889934,0.003955189],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978994,0.00017157354,0.0002597577,0.00024200026,0.00095762056,0.000469621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998202,0.00021543127,0.0001102332,0.00045992323,0.000332986,0.00067940564],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093565567,0.00013951413,0.00014001447,0.0000919897,0.0014106025,0.00056012033,0.0016234127,0.000059638143,0.00015660992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005942857,0.00009762182,0.00003680059,0.00028770498,0.00016860107,0.00015712931,0.00021861937,0.00020802856,0.000077153585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005394101,0.000046630303,0.0015575701,0.00001115887,0.00008697475,0.00033197462,0.089051284,0.0011139084,0.000038747214,0.02368658,0.8831255,0.00089573103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013261885,0.00002631397,0.00027015564,0.000023791548,0.000040495914,0.0000036096533,0.0028971124,0.000022965816,0.00009836647,0.0000872109,0.99625605,0.00014129041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99162054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99921834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6121751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015524449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016942726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2370276253","doi":"","title":"המידתיות החוקתית בדרום אפריקה (Constitutional Proportionality in South Africa)","year":2016,"lang":"he","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Constitutionality; Political science; Constitutional law; Law; Constitutional court; Normative; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Supreme court; Sociology; Constitution","score_opus":0.02384589623482796,"score_gpt":0.2929926217642545,"score_spread":0.26914672552942653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2370276253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5046101,0.088832416,0.038211092,0.054955363,0.010779901,0.0034054522,0.00047310346,0.00054452114,0.29818803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9683521,0.0018894556,0.00012868251,0.00008645112,0.0023265465,0.000022755425,0.0000030290819,0.000033617314,0.027157353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885832,0.0010422842,0.001239196,0.0007810751,0.0020107937,0.006343453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975488,0.0003114659,0.00076689856,0.00042409074,0.00044589853,0.00050281815],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00946339,0.0004843247,0.0005913189,0.00034522967,0.0011420052,0.00023236986,0.0012278168,0.0004877398,0.00196096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015193764,0.00035514342,0.00040717213,0.0011544584,0.0031120568,0.0009737042,0.00018817303,0.0032825868,0.0016857369],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014640584,0.00029787348,0.032691143,0.000011436412,0.00018887669,0.00004544428,0.030918065,0.000012712995,0.00014551492,0.9293896,0.0003331828,0.0058197593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029584754,0.0004352011,0.003873126,0.0003339675,0.0001379337,0.00013783696,0.017379992,0.000012996943,0.000046112775,0.7310532,0.24255992,0.0010712704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022781457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00180233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.463742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0084938435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022481903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2389641338","doi":"","title":"The application of the doctrine of proportionality in South African courts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Southern African Public Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Doctrine; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Statutory law; Constitutionality; Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Democracy; Politics; Supreme court; Constitution","score_opus":0.016155151990462698,"score_gpt":0.26983433229337395,"score_spread":0.25367918030291126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2389641338","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4778444,0.00041208166,0.0002900212,0.028768687,0.0003710523,0.003383466,0.0001958011,0.00015120322,0.4885833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978586,0.000002014191,0.000089366215,0.00007526405,0.000110198824,0.00018273154,0.0000028147608,0.000015615802,0.0016633829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720407,0.00050049776,0.00059227383,0.00026856526,0.00097116164,0.00046343403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977692,0.0002582081,0.00064240186,0.0007401381,0.00046662558,0.00012346925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018338811,0.00013667456,0.00024197857,0.00005217174,0.00044074125,0.00009916331,0.0012097347,0.00010166106,0.00017464264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006173172,0.00007964566,0.00013126804,0.0010990859,0.0024777665,0.00019031674,0.00018083573,0.000220728,0.00006470109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011177536,0.00012491773,0.040667657,0.000011956469,0.000025023519,1.595865e-7,0.13215244,0.0000062363815,0.00009216194,0.82466537,0.000109334826,0.0021335816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007358087,0.00005975149,0.022017747,0.000028056706,0.000038384944,4.943772e-7,0.15055008,0.00015784461,0.00026631408,0.13201967,0.69369316,0.00043265428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020057539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065801144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69358385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015350274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003762079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98646796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2399871532","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3671","title":"Law and development: Forty years after ‘Scholars in Self-Estrangement’","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Embeddedness; Field (mathematics); Political science; Relation (database); Law; Milestone; Sociology; Social science; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.009156073736940879,"score_gpt":0.22802735484153128,"score_spread":0.2188712811045904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2399871532","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56944835,0.0014350849,0.00013088272,0.0003575833,0.00025202546,0.00015076443,0.000008668492,0.0000369767,0.42817968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937241,0.0002477417,0.0053616245,0.000052571333,0.000040878098,6.3674996e-8,1.1803498e-7,0.0000034700504,0.0005694002],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992635,0.00008787073,0.00009753589,0.00009934732,0.0002502031,0.00020150474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996488,0.000029923682,0.00006820687,0.000062599014,0.00005318012,0.00013727257],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041569368,0.00005486244,0.00009864759,0.000016426087,0.0002940083,0.000031995067,0.00020607702,0.00006437953,0.0010888202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010213874,0.000051089053,0.000028798613,0.00002171595,0.00026573727,0.000958628,0.00006316917,0.00007735981,0.000013263273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034085428,0.00027390075,0.12383382,0.00002803077,0.00019256366,0.00063430145,0.71364814,8.9214717e-7,0.00012051651,0.12974174,0.000677252,0.030507954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007359167,0.000022274662,0.029800583,0.000052987787,0.000011085261,0.0000018497103,0.0061693243,1.3557323e-7,0.000013546817,0.0002559514,0.9628412,0.00009511443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023318024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34499475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.962164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045287432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000750562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2412916127","doi":"","title":"Treatment Action Campaign (TAC) v South Africa (Minister of Health): reflections on the right to health care in Canada.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Right to health; Health care; Political science; Constitution; Action (physics); Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.08512447776085207,"score_gpt":0.34406506554057376,"score_spread":0.2589405877797217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2412916127","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23240016,0.0029748604,0.00015277062,0.39256203,0.0038189606,0.0122841075,0.00038226112,0.00023235733,0.35519248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99644774,0.000014489489,0.00007852151,0.0013182554,0.00011227189,0.0009778161,0.0000030358183,0.000010385133,0.0010374832],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980295,0.00039446622,0.00030865974,0.00023346742,0.00042839788,0.00060551515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918014,0.00010309604,0.00015685985,0.00026234167,0.0000491444,0.0002483936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004691853,0.00011204264,0.00022305099,0.00009392204,0.00053277373,0.00002783583,0.00019040167,0.000041302806,0.000020566407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012667973,0.00007968676,0.000043818112,0.00066139735,0.00006664701,0.000050707327,0.000017855695,0.00011626405,0.000010237377],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005391543,0.00010907428,0.0006560626,0.000015836966,0.000018891971,0.0000040925697,0.9677368,0.0002590061,4.2581962e-7,0.004945149,0.0013497093,0.024851045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040949593,0.00018424107,0.011716243,0.000017857586,0.0000062604963,2.8401476e-7,0.11560817,2.589114e-7,0.00009888055,0.00022197435,0.87160224,0.00013408465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85925764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9863341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87025255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010219855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033576773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99357975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2413607570","doi":"","title":"Justice and justiciability: advancing solidarity and justice through South Africans' right to health jurisprudence.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Society for International Health","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Solidarity; Law; Justiciability; Political science; Constitutional court; Right to health; Sociology; Dignity; Economic Justice; Human rights; Politics; Constitution","score_opus":0.05336916577706501,"score_gpt":0.33027084816019603,"score_spread":0.276901682383131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2413607570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7699659,0.008824335,0.015022351,0.04164295,0.0045054276,0.006282568,0.00015709548,0.00097068347,0.15262868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892953,0.00037013952,0.005710147,0.0024047713,0.0008142773,0.00032584462,0.0000011787035,0.000023604252,0.001054739],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963937,0.00039378525,0.0004071119,0.00070082076,0.0007726852,0.0013319098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976468,0.00061657606,0.00020652113,0.00035717926,0.00018232087,0.0009905735],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020253223,0.00023579354,0.00043456882,0.00009748308,0.0021137823,0.00015127636,0.0003578149,0.0001425231,0.000025907202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050905365,0.00023034187,0.000043356627,0.0007774197,0.0009411649,0.00055785564,0.00025735775,0.00034045242,0.00002316193],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011750518,0.00017133502,0.012155958,0.00062035763,0.00004072321,0.000060267565,0.93724275,0.000036478665,0.0000041908766,0.021234611,0.0054079187,0.022907933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013604204,0.00022546551,0.11389803,0.00008081912,0.00091926305,0.000031926393,0.089296624,0.00009911051,0.00008049383,0.007725292,0.78481954,0.001463026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021377825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010011947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8479461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003450984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034191605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414841724","doi":"","title":"Motion to strike claim dismissed in HIV defamation suit.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Publishing; Law; Economic Justice; Motion (physics); Political science; Computer science; Medicine; Virology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03500197644132113,"score_gpt":0.2854225592911853,"score_spread":0.2504205828498642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2414841724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7688877,0.00011480212,0.0016075933,0.009729725,0.0005866951,0.0014671986,0.0000059646636,0.0001957357,0.21740457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928851,0.00001201608,0.00021236972,0.00023362279,0.00024793082,0.0004949327,0.000005637016,0.000008408817,0.00589997],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986676,0.00014817604,0.00017894304,0.00019425826,0.00035572966,0.0004553187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949133,0.00007244534,0.000044842956,0.00014671443,0.000047038455,0.00019760797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008118472,0.0000708755,0.000100340156,0.00011984188,0.00013324874,0.00009150336,0.00022315828,0.00008657773,0.00009613368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081903336,0.000074127456,0.000029480674,0.0007724886,0.000051436433,0.00028229062,0.000033010747,0.000093145485,0.00018443017],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008903989,0.00024346261,0.31161982,0.000013168673,0.00001224121,0.000033788092,0.16874325,0.0003415044,0.000027498929,0.027168896,0.006749443,0.48495787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033739881,0.000006036229,0.56045717,0.00000596971,0.0000057545512,2.515462e-7,0.0027115631,0.0000495937,0.00005941708,0.002056135,0.4341399,0.00017078323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010143444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016271214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4847871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030340304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002674777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.302283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461480614","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3761","title":"The past and future of law and development","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Demise; Contextualization; Context (archaeology); Ethnocentrism; Political science; Law; Sociology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.00945480414423544,"score_gpt":0.2261087200482236,"score_spread":0.21665391590398816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461480614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07173717,0.010427142,0.00020762079,0.0062439353,0.00051656214,0.00012419069,0.000008439514,0.000015821488,0.9107191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99588066,0.0014537977,0.0014953082,0.000019182273,0.0001577867,9.788191e-9,3.6127854e-8,0.0000015787389,0.000991666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953955,0.000067370536,0.00006400085,0.00005034135,0.00017517708,0.000103528604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961823,0.000067862326,0.00009052951,0.000048025922,0.00008754078,0.00008782847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003057276,0.000034854358,0.00006962284,0.0000036918561,0.0009948695,0.000018055302,0.0001605709,0.000037346676,0.00016180913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000067787023,0.000022090717,0.000016709839,0.000007980035,0.0007535866,0.00026158712,0.00006054312,0.000037603924,9.517091e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007029194,0.000018881212,0.0033025476,0.000006275046,0.000056940702,0.000008911556,0.19848275,5.0186294e-8,0.00007698656,0.73926383,0.0007754119,0.057937123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023371216,0.000019385323,0.0016976098,0.00001370531,0.000007011233,0.0000016823096,0.020358592,6.4322634e-8,0.000021235299,0.00031737852,0.97729546,0.00003416947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010340332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10503342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97652006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097986784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043166627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2462379764","doi":"","title":"Official coordinates, lawfully established monuments and South African cadastral surveys","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GEOMATICA","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Cadastre; Art; Political science; Geography; Cartography","score_opus":0.016114930232509445,"score_gpt":0.2735156286909459,"score_spread":0.2574006984584365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2462379764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9040784,0.00019866596,0.0017702051,0.002530729,0.0005676358,0.00060696545,0.000078493256,0.00032892203,0.08983996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955667,0.000004184297,0.0023797136,0.0000748802,0.0002292351,0.000015654638,0.000009014301,0.000019958869,0.0017006269],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782205,0.0003491043,0.0002876807,0.00031865019,0.0005708117,0.0006517114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914116,0.000109729925,0.000093604525,0.0002442809,0.0000996885,0.00031153334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013131519,0.0001739592,0.00026298346,0.000077372424,0.00055063877,0.00028916475,0.00035880678,0.00013426701,0.00024319069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006656612,0.00016976033,0.0000515217,0.0004396003,0.00046218248,0.00031029244,0.0001181161,0.00017535425,0.00017216557],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006970115,0.0005289181,0.030457538,0.00009977882,0.00016767149,0.00015904741,0.8667125,0.0004600333,0.00010668218,0.087736554,0.001668277,0.011833277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01255325,0.0013313781,0.20131882,0.0005140691,0.00058681716,0.000024183444,0.18514137,0.0005188654,0.0011449456,0.14184046,0.44976822,0.0052576265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01226413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034017097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6815711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020401044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026272732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2462575549","doi":"10.25159/2520-9515/875","title":"A PROPOSED MODEL FOR THE APPOINTMENT AND DISMISSAL OF THE NATIONAL COMMISSIONER OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law Society and Development","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presidency; Cabinet (room); Law; Constitution; Politics; Dismissal; Interim; Political science; History","score_opus":0.07855212467861385,"score_gpt":0.346102545491675,"score_spread":0.2675504208130612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2462575549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9769757,0.0003139897,0.0026859075,0.013077562,0.000217987,0.0018148026,0.000022325741,0.0000074645473,0.004884275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995674,0.0000041768376,0.003632093,0.00047260185,0.000052631854,0.000008290368,1.0185462e-7,0.000003508128,0.00015260706],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986224,0.00014648716,0.00033572473,0.000077419514,0.0007036295,0.00011432289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998718,0.00026072006,0.00044737995,0.00007421863,0.00044121043,0.000058438563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015504096,0.00007986117,0.00018706037,0.000005922752,0.0007981445,0.000031365074,0.00031659886,0.000037679776,0.0000028908532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039278333,0.00003460357,0.00008682242,0.00012664753,0.0004210229,0.00006420926,0.0001411349,0.00013218861,9.4516274e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038764996,0.00014880492,0.0016202404,0.000020366831,0.0001356585,9.933591e-9,0.990049,0.00032894153,0.000033304004,0.007163324,0.0003866824,0.0000748807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046421615,0.00034578252,0.03509531,0.00023673393,0.0002803396,0.0000034534648,0.7969931,0.020159908,0.00087571196,0.0066814846,0.13433121,0.0003548311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016318426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025412824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19305596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068384754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042643884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6138763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2462916037","doi":"","title":"New tools for governance.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hospitals & health networks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Business; Process management; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.01905586065075743,"score_gpt":0.3444528136043358,"score_spread":0.32539695295357834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2462916037","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06075538,0.05157902,0.17289816,0.16931035,0.07007396,0.014193305,0.00021847361,0.0026548675,0.45831648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96160084,0.00066260854,0.018321224,0.0030469508,0.006944962,0.00009267758,0.000013110928,0.000040251987,0.009277391],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782985,0.00007853193,0.00035936077,0.0003507136,0.0003785581,0.0010029704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981124,0.0005176217,0.00025867278,0.00037216017,0.00010129091,0.00063785515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012211221,0.00015449073,0.00029070754,0.000016956055,0.00074826874,0.0002502385,0.0005117011,0.00025691232,0.0005949996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006099542,0.00015604978,0.000114251445,0.00029666247,0.0001585377,0.00045056792,0.000054084117,0.00045685837,0.00009255627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022919137,0.000031118205,0.0018156058,0.0000195277,0.000012068668,0.0000017347983,0.031268083,0.00006537806,0.0000020556874,0.25573066,0.3641003,0.34693053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002882226,0.00011285935,0.002875373,0.000024119585,0.000005076112,2.0962584e-7,0.00043476745,0.00015779422,0.0000023358923,0.0034648366,0.9924422,0.0001922047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038030192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053826864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90084547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013848487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008130882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6514828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2464272941","doi":"","title":"Sexual Orientation and the Charter: The Achievement of Formal Legal Equality (1985-2005) and Its Limits","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Portal (King's College London)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Sexual orientation; Political science; Orientation (vector space); Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.06029180085866842,"score_gpt":0.3840803329675603,"score_spread":0.32378853210889186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2464272941","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95245254,0.0016468143,0.000043035703,0.011688353,0.00022490573,0.001893894,0.00010180719,0.00004236885,0.03190631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961531,0.00023511545,0.000054521337,0.00015167889,0.00031658393,0.000106485044,0.000008785716,0.000015523243,0.0029581992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952415,0.0010039805,0.0004552651,0.00039420012,0.0019694127,0.00093561574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981582,0.00071160047,0.00017489768,0.0003400134,0.00037010683,0.00024514695],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00973631,0.00016392158,0.00027531732,0.00011850038,0.001831017,0.00022734079,0.0005390187,0.000121199286,0.000080389436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010030877,0.00010433965,0.000060326125,0.0007238375,0.0019404112,0.00079597795,0.00033719346,0.00055626634,0.000017286957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004557241,0.00015946198,0.0021931902,0.00007202822,0.000082298575,0.000043941567,0.091591485,0.000014998134,0.00033224045,0.90374964,0.0002874741,0.0010175304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.024370562,0.0024982593,0.05247564,0.00032285,0.00024045035,0.00007063277,0.30403996,0.00074703264,0.0051499764,0.027142625,0.58136535,0.0015766658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042650606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069329753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.876607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011867234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005434115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2466951685","doi":"10.14288/1.0077700","title":"Consumer protection in the condominium purchase : the purchaser's perspective","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Business; Advertising; Marketing; Commerce; Computer science","score_opus":0.013718250186556641,"score_gpt":0.23113242620143473,"score_spread":0.21741417601487809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2466951685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96254903,0.00014621623,0.00006358718,0.0037569532,0.00033705178,0.00094239373,0.00004729476,0.000046432735,0.032111067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986975,0.000026492216,0.000072849034,0.000097000506,0.000097567536,0.000004966648,0.0000013672852,0.0000067031324,0.000995542],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985801,0.00036281906,0.00009390395,0.00026555,0.00041796482,0.00027966622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906695,0.00017626738,0.000109678156,0.00031512155,0.0002605836,0.00007140296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011964233,0.00003750336,0.00014678798,0.000033486893,0.0009283358,0.00018748877,0.0007797179,0.00013602222,0.00027806623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046363467,0.000082612365,0.00009406055,0.00053074484,0.002035991,0.00030663508,0.000088718414,0.0005377252,0.00004398522],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011085416,0.00068491517,0.018077826,0.000033565942,0.00010071325,0.000425984,0.64403486,0.000004711639,0.0008656281,0.003104289,0.007761,0.32479563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015289764,0.000070968934,0.5931981,0.00003161694,0.000045733257,0.000023388648,0.3009516,0.000045943772,0.0000014854617,0.004580729,0.09929014,0.00023130824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6666583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89891595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5751203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009506615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019643141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7501694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2481399373","doi":"10.1017/s000202060002713x","title":"Abdullahi A. An-Na'im, ed. Cultural Transformation and Human Rights in Africa. London: Zed Books, 2002. Distributed by St. Martin's Press, x + 269 pp. Tables. Notes. References. Index. $69.95. Cloth. $27.50. Paper. - Abdullahi A. An-Na'im, ed. Human Rights under African Constitutions. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2003. x + 434 pp. Index. Price not reported. Cloth.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Studies Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.046417513727015164,"score_gpt":0.3142752774659616,"score_spread":0.26785776373894643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2481399373","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04192017,0.8749699,0.0008368496,0.0048918505,0.001085033,0.012944981,0.004695142,0.0013256065,0.057330437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9200058,0.07791045,0.00038533844,0.00015731431,0.000202209,0.00012436048,0.00060271507,0.000055468237,0.00055634987],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906673,0.0014039971,0.0024329098,0.0018033267,0.0019163629,0.0017761493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936585,0.00027799967,0.0020283044,0.0013565822,0.0018353293,0.0008433025],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020790529,0.0012093567,0.00253051,0.00016043942,0.0040495247,0.0002853987,0.0015599628,0.0006341504,0.00050109084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004485981,0.0010675245,0.00030633633,0.0023336718,0.00553814,0.0025849766,0.00041871588,0.001180304,0.000030037994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010870075,0.0065198177,0.0042372504,0.006008079,0.003553794,0.0006957063,0.13036385,0.00084793597,0.00074116146,0.3368185,0.50766826,0.0014586269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027087193,0.00038876783,0.0013498309,0.0014678645,0.00082509825,0.000014147498,0.00588063,0.00002475405,0.00008146236,0.0014007064,0.98438865,0.0014693623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07255486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03654518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8780856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013422644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000522906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2482086321","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v36i3.11595","title":"RECONSIDERING THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF MUNICIPAL COUNCILS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Constitution; Legislature; Political science; Privilege (computing); Law; Legislation; Power (physics); Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.29612549673656535,"score_gpt":0.32522373823901013,"score_spread":0.029098241502444777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2482086321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74967647,0.0018069173,0.000002715794,0.0007654009,0.0002116832,0.00007962629,0.0000031651198,0.000021537959,0.24743247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967425,0.000046464,0.00024542838,0.000117696116,0.00009689841,0.000005093215,2.6203654e-7,0.0000044080793,0.002741253],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936014,0.00013382678,0.000095689575,0.0000587356,0.00022081117,0.0001308049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994551,0.00019377179,0.00004259178,0.00016312591,0.000098942204,0.00004644659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008481006,0.000043528293,0.00008002474,0.000015942232,0.00013110628,0.000050524053,0.0001657066,0.00003615309,0.00006568173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029713096,0.000030015384,0.000016875392,0.000067656154,0.00057148206,0.00013701241,0.000060281553,0.000074414944,0.00001438571],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004990193,0.000005974132,0.004128622,0.0000046248897,0.000009122445,0.0000013291875,0.9889373,0.0000018898091,0.00003304919,0.004925062,0.0010698832,0.0008781541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001423639,0.00002717994,0.00044109364,0.000025817511,0.000011167568,0.0000012003989,0.10663016,0.000017348219,0.0002606226,0.003939655,0.8884193,0.00008411336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010169591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001044444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88734937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003062276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006965645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21056494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2487492641","doi":"","title":"Passing on the Torch of Learning in the 'Primordial Soup' of Construction Law: Reflections from the Construction Law Academic Forum, 2012","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Legal education; Management; Political science","score_opus":0.06496778071295242,"score_gpt":0.36258825817781354,"score_spread":0.2976204774648611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2487492641","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45081577,0.00054552173,0.00066915795,0.011807391,0.0018872144,0.00057548034,0.000013450625,0.000079326725,0.5336067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99791706,0.000027709939,0.00070533936,0.0004345135,0.0007125553,0.000017317245,0.000002223393,0.000008491854,0.00017477252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975514,0.0011190206,0.00034268148,0.00013974938,0.0005106341,0.0003365164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760026,0.0017866014,0.00026100906,0.00023633284,0.00007568182,0.000040130384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001777037,0.00010411547,0.00015790167,0.000034705743,0.0010259149,0.00004768902,0.00038689552,0.00019089383,0.0002820984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040589494,0.000055558357,0.00008503053,0.00044220805,0.002039601,0.0004524603,0.000055897344,0.0007825545,0.000019524827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019988565,0.000019546933,0.01977544,0.0000015225577,0.000015179579,5.3323674e-8,0.073064096,0.000028875114,0.00066628656,0.903966,0.00028390385,0.0021591093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045754178,0.00009412679,0.0044461708,0.000090890775,0.00010405443,0.0000048165484,0.4268085,0.000048623508,0.007050531,0.0427607,0.51786155,0.00027251279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021554444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066169896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8612053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009321972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007399065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9849611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2491292666","doi":"10.1163/2211906x-00502005","title":"Reflections on the Supreme Court of Ghana, written by Samuel Kofi Date-Bah","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.08444552360252398,"score_gpt":0.40682011618498515,"score_spread":0.32237459258246115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2491292666","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1485434,0.0008829983,0.0014530199,0.020492246,0.0009334844,0.00025735082,0.00024262242,0.000026575522,0.8271683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980668,0.00003206761,0.0003302921,0.0004681423,0.00028950346,0.000002051188,6.174193e-7,0.000004449148,0.00080609374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976999,0.0006128134,0.00045760494,0.0001279256,0.0008110652,0.00029066834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811924,0.00046257317,0.00048126504,0.00020577385,0.00056895963,0.00016219035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080368685,0.0001303456,0.00034260156,0.000027612521,0.00038239642,0.00006374739,0.000727643,0.00007331412,0.0003286481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012046778,0.00006989135,0.00014836773,0.00035813823,0.0010906162,0.00032496612,0.00005011818,0.00018644075,0.00010193526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001509726,0.00013322353,0.0007066937,0.00000152805,0.00012591203,0.000006525667,0.0089419475,0.000008063316,0.0010226155,0.879405,0.10933586,0.0001616521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005700019,0.00038418718,0.00052251504,0.00011064679,0.00005124799,0.000008983186,0.005663111,0.000001723373,0.0027683063,0.025329893,0.96444184,0.00014755322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052673195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084117625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.855106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002172106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017112114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40184212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2492672834","doi":"10.22158/wjssr.v3n3p352","title":"Public Transportation in South Africa: Challenges and Opportunities","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Journal of Social Science Research","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Public transport; Government (linguistics); Poverty; Public policy; State (computer science); Public administration; Inequality; Economic growth; Political science; Bus rapid transit; Transportation infrastructure; Business; Economics; Engineering; Transport engineering; Law","score_opus":0.38062263090240117,"score_gpt":0.4282627552406466,"score_spread":0.04764012433824544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2492672834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21112753,0.0139336195,0.000036290192,0.11683957,0.0005331905,0.0003638833,0.000010736302,0.00003570993,0.65711945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99479187,0.002043534,0.00007790469,0.000013581971,0.00036274508,0.000004222314,4.219731e-8,0.000005978061,0.0027001442],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957437,0.00055090734,0.00033339078,0.00018918666,0.0024117471,0.00077109673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980323,0.0004416055,0.00015842132,0.000077066856,0.00093220966,0.00035839918],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015419031,0.00007092451,0.00018404226,0.0012190323,0.0009257003,0.00019274506,0.00071455195,0.00005827148,0.00012341175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011366847,0.000049738683,0.000045128138,0.0014276793,0.00496904,0.0014500808,0.000046636447,0.00033976187,0.000007911903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018664503,0.000035153804,0.0014486138,0.000005730256,0.000003590687,0.000033300938,0.47981867,2.9499814e-8,0.00026292878,0.40220183,0.000118282056,0.1160532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070768653,0.0001382935,0.047211524,0.00014173519,0.00000593181,0.0000011274714,0.19820839,7.9736895e-7,0.00007144289,0.040125396,0.7131761,0.00021161165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038773298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089754234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78366435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041273507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013071601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99773884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2499526531","doi":"10.29173/alr108","title":"Comparing Aboriginal and Other Duties to Consult in Canadian Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Charter; Jurisprudence; Law; Constitution; Political science; Section (typography); Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.037624990442016455,"score_gpt":0.3629828335306127,"score_spread":0.3253578430885963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2499526531","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008064631,0.07761342,1.9378307e-7,0.0030682986,0.00019929555,0.0003799274,0.0000032774722,0.000011498369,0.91065943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98511547,0.0014829561,0.00012134807,0.011789779,0.000120340395,0.000026809348,8.609892e-7,0.000009538307,0.0013329029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883604,0.00015287068,0.00018015475,0.00013513962,0.00014284143,0.0005529503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908704,0.00016379461,0.00003272888,0.00015909378,0.000027020205,0.0005303246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067422603,0.00009502465,0.00026022806,0.000023544166,0.0002106767,0.000052399522,0.00018164204,0.00004662596,0.00047579463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016185947,0.00008673758,0.00002373747,0.00024832416,0.00025697783,0.00020264677,0.000021798152,0.000094500596,0.00047439334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.5786367e-7,0.0000061515125,0.060837306,0.0000865526,0.0000039099245,8.6918396e-7,0.017337618,7.140814e-8,1.686361e-7,0.92079246,0.00076108746,0.00017314266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049551516,0.0000039308607,0.00039413618,0.0005671313,0.000014815749,8.4696546e-7,0.00012325835,4.0390506e-7,0.0000015019237,0.00011716864,0.9986067,0.00012060163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98985034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013490971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011232208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6097525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510241885","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.43.1.133","title":"Changing Family Forms, Patterns and Emerging Challenges Within the South African Indian Diaspora","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nuclear family; Diaspora; Context (archaeology); Extended family; Colonialism; Politics; Democracy; Sociology; Gender studies; Family life; Flexibility (engineering); Political economy; Development economics; Political science; History; Anthropology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.13226223015817212,"score_gpt":0.3759100507220304,"score_spread":0.24364782056385825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510241885","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89665127,0.09342539,0.00007820318,0.0014542516,0.0009327058,0.00019017042,0.000007041888,0.000020280015,0.007240694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953702,0.002986232,0.00020723364,0.00023762939,0.0010799229,0.000010527772,2.0974326e-7,0.00001255384,0.000095484385],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976974,0.00041306546,0.000496271,0.00013973695,0.0006881934,0.0005653394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980467,0.00050358765,0.00075575855,0.00013952181,0.0003574754,0.00019695966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025521002,0.00021884966,0.0005760651,0.00022251386,0.001015638,0.000080156446,0.00036129466,0.000055258864,0.0000033301924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021741632,0.00013276393,0.00010965903,0.00035145605,0.00063406635,0.0006781601,0.0001820409,0.0003991373,0.00000845009],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022023014,0.00003192156,0.01802501,0.000016401273,0.00027782738,0.000007747503,0.975378,0.000010066546,0.000010786801,0.00541578,0.0001968588,0.0006075774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002171323,0.00009790829,0.06317675,0.00010882924,0.000066647626,0.0000028657494,0.9216964,0.0000030101883,0.00002791348,0.0006901848,0.013747685,0.00016465293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007452375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001796977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09871894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012125715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007194305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7811569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516362872","doi":"10.53386/nilq.v67i1.94","title":"Stormont House Agreement: Model Implementation Bill","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council; Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Econometrics; Economics","score_opus":0.018840458857021965,"score_gpt":0.31808359846222845,"score_spread":0.2992431396052065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516362872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90557504,0.00017850238,0.0025899012,0.0018250127,0.0008464741,0.00059459417,0.000045413875,0.00046587846,0.08787921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926376,0.0000049604055,0.00046494105,0.00024348125,0.001076679,0.00003307692,0.000009369623,0.000037979204,0.005491964],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979334,0.00015741686,0.00032153027,0.000353652,0.00066435436,0.0005696293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990503,0.00003704084,0.00014375479,0.00033491798,0.00021715017,0.00021681283],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004935149,0.000182835,0.00017787384,0.00008486956,0.0007582452,0.00022055583,0.00037825224,0.00012277695,0.00057723775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020320727,0.00014478897,0.00009394076,0.00024849427,0.0003244188,0.0005789615,0.000019108847,0.00016698694,0.0013956699],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009463722,0.0001475923,0.03204082,0.000007742936,0.000076373675,0.000021060881,0.8611159,0.000027705693,0.00015303832,0.010597756,0.0060048383,0.08971255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016885162,0.00145335,0.0031476999,0.000019134279,0.000081969396,0.0000017406182,0.032607835,0.0015074738,0.00007825809,0.0046631764,0.9540379,0.00071296835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030971294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15995415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94803303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022405772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002268962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517233587","doi":"","title":"The adjudication of customs' tariff classification disputes in South Africa : lessons from Australia and Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Tariff; Tribunal; Adjudication; Duty; Position (finance); Rules of origin; Business; International trade; Dispute resolution; Law; Political science; International trade law; Finance","score_opus":0.05479371487939794,"score_gpt":0.2720279670312292,"score_spread":0.2172342521518313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517233587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9771512,0.0005329269,0.00040229465,0.0024750284,0.0012465199,0.00022804084,0.0000644626,0.000021787393,0.01787773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978445,0.000013286248,0.0005681521,0.0000019046076,0.00011086821,7.337299e-7,0.000007769357,0.0000023145606,0.0014504822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988212,0.00015679302,0.00013011092,0.0001836576,0.0005675624,0.00014069326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904335,0.00018019915,0.00021791145,0.00018203926,0.00024377946,0.00013271304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003297178,0.00006783072,0.00012241983,0.000038692488,0.0005378626,0.00002023205,0.00031093252,0.00010193458,0.000005984475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032591584,0.00007168791,0.000026434323,0.00020704846,0.0009851924,0.00026793493,0.00006160719,0.00012741218,0.0000019194183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022292236,0.0001018655,0.18932487,0.000021412112,0.00008707915,0.000033442528,0.3281836,0.0006309871,0.0010876986,0.4749969,0.0049294624,0.00037976398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090413354,0.000049024125,0.25694674,0.000112115624,0.00010003923,9.144092e-7,0.1374515,0.00070265017,0.00023459659,0.0032300102,0.599954,0.00031426706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7259684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5845995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5950246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005633133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018243532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4229805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519724377","doi":"","title":"Victim policies and criminal justice on the road to restorative justice, E. Fattah and S. Parmentier : book review","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta criminologica","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Restorative justice; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.12622316862556424,"score_gpt":0.35927118255432017,"score_spread":0.23304801392875593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519724377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12478698,0.17678726,0.00001609788,0.19519827,0.0007897567,0.0020173127,0.000029503779,0.00028017015,0.50009465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8902016,0.045491003,0.0003093861,0.054798692,0.0002997747,0.0000944928,0.0000010346274,0.000014007219,0.008790005],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802655,0.00041938896,0.00023994777,0.0004035511,0.0004032139,0.00050736516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865115,0.0005566099,0.00011779896,0.00035180215,0.000111684865,0.00021098198],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004558213,0.00021487483,0.0002798141,0.00006310064,0.0011883848,0.00016327105,0.0004230628,0.00012154385,0.0010916962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024275512,0.0001397759,0.00004114182,0.00024782526,0.00079200324,0.00023070474,0.00021703195,0.0002926053,0.0001938108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032910157,0.00011047069,0.00006378844,0.00036045312,0.000036448626,0.000028865838,0.2920304,5.429947e-7,0.000076384706,0.020607049,0.6749741,0.011678606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090822934,0.00026411898,0.0010482509,0.00019097856,0.00064919883,0.000003528785,0.028225726,0.0000060515376,0.000027882228,0.00017431508,0.96909624,0.0002228703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024083874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027569171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76541466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007245538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002351035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521054874","doi":"","title":"East Africa Law Society, Eals Practice Manual Series – Number 3, The Constitutionnal Law Digest, Nairobi, Law Africa Publishing, 2005","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Publishing; Interpretation (philosophy); Ethnology; Humanities; Sociology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02209106361165802,"score_gpt":0.30401797350563853,"score_spread":0.2819269098939805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521054874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045383957,0.00038668903,0.001080562,0.030383982,0.0016874996,0.0003860851,0.0001824936,0.00026337008,0.96517545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9614511,0.00008803701,0.0031197679,0.0050583435,0.003193749,0.000058317382,0.00005240582,0.000040753814,0.026937516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99600965,0.0002974352,0.0006589578,0.00055420067,0.0014300816,0.0010496936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969572,0.00088028033,0.0004675026,0.00046060357,0.0008297349,0.00040468754],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038469029,0.0003006402,0.0002914654,0.000043367098,0.0016434717,0.0018061093,0.0016395001,0.00035830314,0.0010505291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014056695,0.00029446106,0.00033436727,0.00040223933,0.0027960183,0.0042336695,0.00025581804,0.00083645113,0.00053429033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007387033,0.0001951727,0.00013059925,0.00001170234,0.00016191787,0.00009473564,0.06840982,0.000048378246,0.000024128136,0.9062551,0.024486823,0.00010774745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032009752,0.00002132287,0.000046968904,0.00006560805,0.000069111564,0.00015189967,0.009896095,0.00003150401,0.0000375282,0.035337947,0.95368373,0.0003381636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02830208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06863494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9609973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013541373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005967669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523307492","doi":"","title":"Magnus Killander (dir.), International Law and Domestic Human Rights Litigation in Africa, Cape Town, Pretoria University Law Press, 2010","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Cape; Human rights; Political science","score_opus":0.012774952310499077,"score_gpt":0.2542703782032494,"score_spread":0.2414954258927503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523307492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15269673,0.00027565937,0.000079464466,0.0017960742,0.0016789363,0.0004541156,0.00006457887,0.00010983927,0.8428446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9672677,0.00002679622,0.0004363217,0.00011853874,0.00068452803,0.000019735602,0.000053114545,0.000013036029,0.031380214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998432,0.00012399,0.00027786495,0.00037156654,0.00046141632,0.0003331894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901044,0.00017992716,0.00014511116,0.00018378509,0.00028776313,0.00019297727],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031734293,0.0001506389,0.00017427468,0.00012221724,0.00031301816,0.00023764769,0.00060859206,0.00018156185,0.0011191374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000114385824,0.00017803595,0.00006351867,0.00013120093,0.00041211967,0.0008100926,0.000103049526,0.0002580247,0.00008429524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018007542,0.00007955594,0.0023159592,0.000008239723,0.000039918374,0.00005173719,0.013223174,0.000039605882,0.00008315174,0.98242736,0.0015944558,0.00011882084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000650512,0.000026275986,0.005642602,0.00007863264,0.000020806849,0.000010838557,0.00035981927,0.00078004133,0.000021654289,0.117732264,0.8743983,0.0002782557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17015019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08373577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87280387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008011878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007678406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523355058","doi":"10.1093/jeclap/lpw056","title":"South Africa: The Criminalisation of Cartel Conduct","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Competition Law & Practice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cartel; Legislation; Competition (biology); Business; Imprisonment; Organised crime; Competition law; Collusion; International trade; Political science; Law; Economics; Market economy; Monopoly","score_opus":0.0844969108818255,"score_gpt":0.3411680185562723,"score_spread":0.25667110767444684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523355058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019030156,0.0006737266,0.0020812417,0.018270086,0.0009934217,0.00014023599,0.000011843193,0.00002654141,0.9587727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964249,0.0000825722,0.0012248461,0.0004601408,0.0009858093,4.886446e-7,3.0705186e-7,0.000014342357,0.0008065675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958097,0.0026607744,0.0005155373,0.00010199858,0.0007388539,0.00017313601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958328,0.0015248873,0.001295134,0.0002134834,0.0010314651,0.00010222498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045459196,0.00008665288,0.00016339537,0.000048049606,0.00032571968,0.00009267055,0.00044989545,0.000030506837,0.00034181474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038988597,0.000049365073,0.00011271134,0.0001903088,0.000628366,0.0012224413,0.000049974624,0.0002140046,0.00016016731],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016553137,0.00011966273,0.00008547459,0.000008297264,0.00006293482,0.00006184719,0.13736475,0.000008647595,0.0027730288,0.8570313,0.0015361944,0.00078235206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035768107,0.00014346241,0.0002632767,0.00007873562,0.00012965154,0.000027365113,0.017610937,5.173043e-7,0.00030979273,0.0008952018,0.98010635,0.000077020864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008991628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018647745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97857016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008382385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013773814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46675807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523838823","doi":"10.1080/17533171.2016.1223613","title":"“Apartheid in a parka”? Roots and longevity of the Canada–South Africa comparison","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Safundi","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada; Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry","keywords":"Oppression; Context (archaeology); Face (sociological concept); Foundation (evidence); Public policy; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; History; Politics; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.02618631270289475,"score_gpt":0.2793362613583213,"score_spread":0.25314994865542656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523838823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9148079,0.0011062216,0.000014147421,0.0032086405,0.00041768115,0.000284988,0.00005547156,0.000021597318,0.080083326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99844867,0.000008344883,0.000035276273,0.000041067797,0.000060121754,0.0000060055077,1.6892253e-7,0.0000056725466,0.0013946837],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998701,0.00024721777,0.00019718958,0.0001645167,0.00038331607,0.0003067734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992826,0.00023805315,0.00011065584,0.00023711559,0.000037684364,0.00009388561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045529945,0.00007879351,0.00018004034,0.000024563013,0.0001542853,0.000016365779,0.00031933287,0.00005942136,0.0000876812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047759438,0.000045646055,0.000028520393,0.00028524626,0.00041594656,0.0000719295,0.00010362777,0.000089241126,0.000007945962],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018114992,0.00002941898,0.86743504,0.00000853618,0.000009185749,0.0000027042379,0.123141326,0.000002181042,0.00007179768,0.0042398395,0.0020076835,0.0030341973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041657934,0.000022719041,0.36821553,0.00008516074,0.00001376052,1.9019201e-7,0.0048866747,0.00000774327,0.00023014718,0.0015490018,0.62439907,0.0001734511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29683778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90575707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62239134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015010619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040329745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7078447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2526541440","doi":"","title":"Mulki Al-Sharmani, dir, Feminist Activism, Women’s Rights And Legal Reform, Londres, Zed Books, 2013","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019580699531691257,"score_gpt":0.2930893376940419,"score_spread":0.2735086381623506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2526541440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29902723,0.00056870916,0.00008411398,0.0044008293,0.0015434726,0.0003121047,0.00010485244,0.00021340171,0.69374526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94061667,0.000062679,0.00049157225,0.0010281265,0.0010423125,0.000088985806,0.000030312554,0.000029895693,0.056609448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782574,0.00011688763,0.00034799022,0.00043293825,0.00072413735,0.00055229885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859625,0.0001097927,0.00020377467,0.00027294498,0.00023991808,0.0005772957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007976252,0.0002056007,0.0002660676,0.00015747779,0.0002776225,0.00033447638,0.00070799637,0.00015049256,0.00055161683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027094086,0.00021815494,0.0000824773,0.00014549337,0.0003244372,0.00064844557,0.00014090019,0.00032225274,0.0002868457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047333282,0.00045657135,0.0016585084,0.000044668082,0.00031260308,0.00071249274,0.17027779,0.00002633582,0.00023304549,0.7442739,0.078256175,0.00327456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006278738,0.000055540477,0.00017960614,0.000045563233,0.000014644227,0.000050666302,0.0017641236,0.00036831966,0.0000621511,0.011848699,0.9847033,0.0002794954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053710703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015872194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9064472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028310772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044949068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9525907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527964352","doi":"10.71781/2516","title":"Critique féministe matérialiste du droit civil québécois : le travail « domestique » et les violences sexuées, les « impensés » du droit du logement","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.033239801098916825,"score_gpt":0.33885643912255575,"score_spread":0.3056166380236389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527964352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5158108,0.008690251,0.0001821753,0.008375723,0.0046414756,0.0033059102,0.0008822973,0.00004793206,0.45806342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9198245,0.0035428249,0.0030220372,0.00028707474,0.0019955987,0.00046465438,0.0011810812,0.00017782964,0.0695044],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99072266,0.0022344678,0.0018479599,0.0020132326,0.0018093488,0.0013723243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945709,0.00096568937,0.0014571444,0.0009845746,0.0011881645,0.00083351636],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005995201,0.0012302742,0.0017516508,0.0002591482,0.001992717,0.0021903042,0.004120823,0.0017508864,0.0068487423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016856616,0.0013585857,0.00046589994,0.00086215057,0.001892168,0.0014940972,0.0006905937,0.0012913953,0.0015543514],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005610264,0.0012932584,0.0039954023,0.00043477266,0.0005359185,0.0006371534,0.72288465,0.00008665947,0.0003662156,0.0679627,0.010038465,0.19120379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014239912,0.0004978525,0.0019107743,0.0011990862,0.00045351402,0.000031349886,0.22092202,0.000089467,0.00057712937,0.0064908597,0.7646358,0.0017681757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5183707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73648566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7545973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008906923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004762142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528975407","doi":"","title":"The Role of Dignity in Canadian and South African Gender Equality Jurisprudence","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Jurisprudence; Jurisdiction; Disadvantage; Law; Sociology; Gender equality; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.055525963570154956,"score_gpt":0.33650898016338376,"score_spread":0.28098301659322883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528975407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9448121,0.026986834,0.0000034724128,0.0017943555,0.00029524646,0.00013584357,0.000023916473,0.00000826738,0.025939953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979058,0.0014926656,0.00011564699,0.0000494518,0.00016316205,0.0000021307162,6.4525985e-8,0.000006877606,0.00026422643],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979429,0.00036444093,0.000507766,0.000120524346,0.0006188011,0.00044553055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984228,0.00041961088,0.00037441918,0.00013073682,0.00039839436,0.0002540142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023068863,0.000113291244,0.00035089318,0.00011334217,0.00091097044,0.0000358503,0.00039777384,0.000058696784,0.000005500577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001733834,0.00007755338,0.0000761649,0.00037979725,0.0012836233,0.0002767065,0.00009831513,0.00032451117,0.0000021258443],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004639492,0.000036352376,0.33381456,0.0000102381155,0.000114861694,0.00008463933,0.6570135,0.00001217699,0.000020008658,0.007487838,0.00037137105,0.0009881076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047331152,0.00015301116,0.16730383,0.000055391443,0.000059797345,0.000025367031,0.22492528,0.000007598566,0.00010373644,0.0068964018,0.59972125,0.00027503356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20920058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44365257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59934986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031619368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007862174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79606545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529091141","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.33.3.377","title":"Dual Legal System, Basotho Culture and Marital Stability","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Proclamation; Champion; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.14663799853541848,"score_gpt":0.3779781005958598,"score_spread":0.2313401020604413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529091141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74516386,0.070531085,0.000051829913,0.00086928054,0.0012364434,0.00022869343,0.000019179915,0.000039396542,0.18186025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99596393,0.00063423614,0.0009754075,0.00006553732,0.0006846902,0.000005011702,1.2545176e-7,0.0000052537025,0.0016657824],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787354,0.00052784994,0.0004961451,0.00016028021,0.0006737738,0.00026839654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981475,0.0003752701,0.00037265403,0.00010248997,0.0008517166,0.00015039169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009112492,0.00016742703,0.0006334892,0.000064573964,0.00060002663,0.00012407624,0.00018714352,0.00006749427,0.000034911318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000314913,0.000120196426,0.000114885916,0.00024608776,0.0009990464,0.00057950674,0.00009284878,0.0003377568,0.000020034784],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008795298,0.00017574483,0.01702534,0.00007774329,0.0005960647,0.0001286616,0.8805603,0.000009210439,0.00016972143,0.029345397,0.071566924,0.00025693956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006172817,0.00036751863,0.007978754,0.00012346554,0.00010115032,0.000020255318,0.50400996,0.00003576068,0.000060373164,0.0003248642,0.48614064,0.00021997985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000062164516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000113006754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4145737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024901153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047613965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49014682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529910913","doi":"","title":"Military courts in a democratic South Africa: in search of their judicial independence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Democracy; Judicial independence; Political science; Law; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.028136188697696112,"score_gpt":0.26580457000992463,"score_spread":0.23766838131222853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529910913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7437803,0.00087614724,0.000018669052,0.00016870558,0.00020838523,0.0009568363,0.00015726736,0.000018730738,0.25381494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737145,0.00029552914,0.0006296589,0.0000064605856,0.000033382086,1.8075426e-7,0.000094519615,0.00001821945,0.02520755],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99660176,0.00060452695,0.00037092293,0.00057794113,0.0011853043,0.00065955584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978294,0.0002538705,0.0005731314,0.0005188545,0.0005624835,0.00026227042],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013850471,0.00032645505,0.0011425227,0.00081527274,0.00038903544,0.000016690932,0.00299811,0.00078084535,0.0035709855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011704924,0.0004500566,0.00025846853,0.001184488,0.0009835861,0.0012136982,0.0006209762,0.0008069515,0.000029111945],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014120537,0.00044450106,0.01036634,0.00024223985,0.00014486327,0.00014282494,0.98133075,0.00007459191,0.00023810624,0.001521649,0.0010710171,0.0030110704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024120118,0.0002150644,0.049227107,0.0007537037,0.00026487015,6.679116e-7,0.9347073,0.00011451171,0.00009807692,0.0008533684,0.010638386,0.0007149533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14236434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2084988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22993419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048922497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018457703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W253311260","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1207","title":"Fighting for the Right to Housing in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wellesley Institute; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Appeal; Legislation; Political science; Context (archaeology); Law; Economic Justice; Common law; Fair Housing Act; Public administration","score_opus":0.04495896988797166,"score_gpt":0.35400155828177166,"score_spread":0.3090425883938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W253311260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5753164,0.0010327998,0.00023358427,0.20841344,0.0019203584,0.00052896066,0.000026688982,0.000013875244,0.21251385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99321896,0.0000043772793,0.000195038,0.0030635535,0.0033484933,0.0000011705288,5.5476217e-8,0.000004534101,0.00016384647],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921167,0.0000785457,0.00018349833,0.000041258627,0.00027529275,0.00020975266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994267,0.00017604991,0.00011144832,0.000027717151,0.00013114179,0.00012693391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008116024,0.00004263794,0.00012722354,0.00003269503,0.00043371593,0.00006907509,0.00016157962,0.000033069577,0.0000036078354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038427504,0.000029313633,0.000032566335,0.00014089023,0.000085155996,0.000108316526,0.000023164206,0.000107145934,4.7125573e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048377857,0.000013640739,0.00096438144,0.000006887321,0.000022933424,0.000018056617,0.5535956,0.00004015018,0.000010165207,0.42757523,0.013036927,0.004667612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002768576,0.000021717477,0.00025896105,0.000009964306,0.00000882237,8.7875026e-7,0.01538604,0.000007725616,0.000013802266,0.0070494106,0.9769089,0.000056871148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9473584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9601667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.963872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059638335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023200691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4115703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549553488","doi":"10.4102/ids.v50i1.2167","title":"Godsdienspluraliteit en die liberale staat – die illusie van sekulêre neutraliteit","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"In die Skriflig/In Luce Verbi","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Secularism; Secular state; Jurisprudence; Law; Appeal; State (computer science); Democracy; Liberalism; Political science; Pluralism (philosophy); Religious pluralism; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.017794358112309637,"score_gpt":0.3095690067877702,"score_spread":0.2917746486754606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549553488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8083243,0.0046133003,0.000027288386,0.010246007,0.0018336701,0.00097343995,0.00009931724,0.00043187034,0.17345081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96001166,0.0015273942,0.00064441754,0.0005732723,0.0007765016,0.00011395195,0.000008838088,0.00008753678,0.036256403],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99418014,0.0009376527,0.00092893466,0.0010882845,0.0009811418,0.001883858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969729,0.0011614269,0.00023503377,0.0009787113,0.00016062155,0.00049129897],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015214977,0.00053684245,0.0007215726,0.00040271008,0.00035823553,0.00020849163,0.0012986939,0.00053299085,0.0007680017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012198339,0.0004403931,0.00025793607,0.0008550213,0.00092237926,0.0013026603,0.00044408222,0.00055963814,0.0011514645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055182603,0.0011336865,0.23622264,0.00024948295,0.00017552612,0.0051303348,0.6275022,0.00015434338,0.0029482325,0.02658484,0.007673463,0.09167343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016707669,0.00012825464,0.018414274,0.00045330857,0.000031044106,0.0000028787656,0.0031081636,0.000015949565,0.0008387311,0.010408827,0.9639505,0.0009772921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062718755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015146673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9562771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085134676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027960984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550333647","doi":"10.14264/uql.2016.675","title":"Challenging the efficacy of no-drop prosecution policies in domestic violence cases: a comparative legal analysis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"The University of Queensland","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Political science; Obligation; Enforcement; Legislation; Criminal justice; Law; Plaintiff; Criminology; Poison control; Sociology; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.022311321160979884,"score_gpt":0.316811300763871,"score_spread":0.2944999796028911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550333647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95877165,0.00064889214,0.000062724524,0.0002833811,0.00011593523,0.00043659876,0.000048463276,0.000017334734,0.03961505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961642,0.00035578967,0.00001755673,0.0000038451717,0.000052710428,5.1019236e-7,0.000021419164,0.000004193678,0.0033798],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986681,0.00041034477,0.00017616377,0.00017543256,0.0003700715,0.00019993455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830717,0.00081068976,0.0003670431,0.00025110127,0.0002287116,0.000035300076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004704932,0.00012701708,0.00038639116,0.00022126982,0.0004501095,0.000015371286,0.00058679114,0.00012359474,0.000053524287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019676433,0.00008281822,0.00015682961,0.0007049438,0.00074779923,0.00010609544,0.000041836083,0.0001963534,0.000016521997],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052543794,0.00013414091,0.00377508,0.00007734878,0.0004816539,0.000031919608,0.98491895,0.00024191671,0.00007585408,0.00927973,0.00009297732,0.00036499783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033450325,0.00033685614,0.21394956,0.0027034855,0.0036794092,0.000003052257,0.75426775,0.0007447814,0.00026413676,0.0015020155,0.018260038,0.0009439074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041252766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031429987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23065121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121982215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018975176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9862439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556045997","doi":"","title":"Is a Class Action a ‘Classy Act’ to Implement outside the Ambit of the Constitution?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eSpace (Curtin University)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0482789081837574,"score_gpt":0.3277495910763121,"score_spread":0.27947068289255467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2556045997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44532937,0.000078314966,0.0007071167,0.06298199,0.0016749672,0.0010960641,0.000043512213,0.0001173609,0.4879713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778321,0.000008706772,0.00014301234,0.00041287078,0.0001678504,0.0000012367543,3.710571e-7,0.000004368123,0.021429496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986425,0.00031208713,0.00010484869,0.0001459635,0.00041104745,0.00038356512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912274,0.00013957068,0.00015034918,0.0003307906,0.000109564884,0.00014697043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004964845,0.0000935349,0.00011050439,0.000083815714,0.00074928906,0.000033455708,0.0005592984,0.00007382524,0.00028686435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023355983,0.00006814233,0.00010149868,0.0009341115,0.00041634942,0.00029877978,0.00025741832,0.00016668277,0.000116847135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000749156,0.00010426544,0.08092188,0.000009516337,0.00007834771,0.0000024868134,0.29824176,0.000030710304,0.00087165914,0.59280616,0.026226822,0.00063145725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015427938,0.000016075504,0.0054441183,0.000011456027,0.000047917936,2.5822553e-7,0.039096545,0.0000024397361,0.0014876743,0.000051376577,0.9536005,0.00008730671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023725207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043898458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9273737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039050725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022993611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57630014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556967335","doi":"","title":"What Could Possibly Go Wrong? Examining the Consequences of the City of Toronto Public Square By-laws on Diversity in Yonge-Dundas Square","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Square (algebra); Diversity (politics); Law; Political science; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.02596646077086317,"score_gpt":0.24030823119868747,"score_spread":0.2143417704278243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2556967335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83954155,0.00023085953,0.00002567146,0.06741928,0.0006027062,0.00061133824,0.000090488174,0.00012924547,0.091348834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817996,0.00025419082,0.00010719425,0.00028034966,0.00005658479,8.3472077e-7,0.0000065244644,0.000013764355,0.017480966],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965379,0.0014228754,0.00022384553,0.0004294765,0.00088563457,0.00050022063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780804,0.00081595674,0.00039738088,0.0006652688,0.00012488273,0.00018844318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005356902,0.0002323265,0.00037412622,0.00008980638,0.0011097244,0.00019692293,0.0020429713,0.00026400413,0.000635353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035065244,0.00018158188,0.00016250556,0.0007778327,0.0022283208,0.0037797634,0.0011346648,0.00038591961,0.000009948292],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013325409,0.00019424615,0.79922336,0.00005451682,0.000057549103,0.000011557239,0.12065696,0.000020580577,0.000016627459,0.05306923,0.025975173,0.00058692234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012653846,0.00050230464,0.18351656,0.00048724198,0.00009660223,1.4627894e-7,0.2356076,0.000011952333,0.0017051569,0.0018160992,0.57427824,0.00071272714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11159657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014411755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6157068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034934632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037473554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8943194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561333220","doi":"10.1111/1467-9655.12542","title":"Rights and responsibilities in rural South Africa: implications for gender, generation, and personhood","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Wenner-Gren Foundation","keywords":"Personhood; Human rights; Subject (documents); Sociology; Value (mathematics); Meaning (existential); Neglect; Gender studies; Environmental ethics; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.09179248282789317,"score_gpt":0.3469678345541576,"score_spread":0.25517535172626443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561333220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9722219,0.002235388,0.0017525743,0.020273747,0.00080666604,0.00028603774,0.00003131609,0.000014753714,0.0023775809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962437,0.000070642614,0.0018606158,0.00006324515,0.00039218055,0.0000074799277,1.4786201e-7,0.0000033649724,0.0013586296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998967,0.00020767994,0.00030246677,0.00012942332,0.00016583037,0.00022763252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921024,0.00023471982,0.00017792151,0.000111885,0.00015233495,0.00011292397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072270574,0.00009092811,0.0001888389,0.0000541502,0.0007727669,0.00006336555,0.00024066873,0.00010671967,0.000041841402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011348758,0.000041377512,0.00007562536,0.00011254686,0.0024413806,0.0002351848,0.00007732514,0.00012029627,0.0000012966085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003622566,0.00025658146,0.051149294,0.000019108971,0.000097200755,0.000015122007,0.19534823,0.000048358183,0.0012341697,0.7396606,0.0066213133,0.0051877373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045309733,0.0010018817,0.09874001,0.00020912144,0.00020843264,0.00005183975,0.037297856,0.0002156354,0.0005329112,0.3904631,0.46594974,0.0007984772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014303101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038508896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4593284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098184835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011619317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8995369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564468797","doi":"10.1080/23323256.2016.1238772","title":"Is it enough to talk of marriage as a process? Legitimate co-habitation in Umlazi, South Africa","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Southern Africa","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Sociology; Ambiguity; Position (finance); Order (exchange); Space (punctuation); Gender studies; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04132436547426474,"score_gpt":0.380034638374425,"score_spread":0.3387102729001603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564468797","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37356985,0.00091760565,0.0013065739,0.059335504,0.00095468626,0.0020739404,0.0009113352,0.0003748346,0.56055564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877528,0.000026357366,0.00053453393,0.00038258522,0.00018242061,0.000112270114,0.0000035865296,0.000052713964,0.010952749],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99637717,0.00048832805,0.00066640857,0.00070866285,0.00070784555,0.0010515812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981286,0.00043554895,0.00036136585,0.00052105676,0.0002723876,0.00028107755],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008973426,0.0003176739,0.0005697799,0.00036171437,0.00041118986,0.00004656924,0.0008019009,0.00038392414,0.0075653666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013909744,0.00025291526,0.00014540699,0.0010331759,0.0026356934,0.0002782926,0.00012192062,0.00020614815,0.0037410874],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015547336,0.00018306481,0.0054501574,0.000024952673,0.000043425196,0.000043878164,0.9845349,0.0000028266693,0.00089528394,0.004637608,0.0031293156,0.00089909945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017331459,0.0007571457,0.00032790352,0.0002182126,0.00007047425,0.0000038091775,0.50893223,0.000008282427,0.003195277,0.019047108,0.46482316,0.0008832554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017059599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007839579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61418295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019525684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035189258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W256952874","doi":"10.4324/9781315243450-41","title":"Sentencing the corporate offender: Legal and social issues","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Sentencing guidelines; Political science; Transparency (behavior); Context (archaeology); Law; Punishment (psychology); Legislation; Criminology; Imprisonment; Politics; Penology; Sociology; Sentence; Prison; History; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.037950854719609135,"score_gpt":0.21725911686657964,"score_spread":0.17930826214697052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W256952874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038093276,0.0018344029,0.00040654384,0.003506778,0.00067853375,0.0009818528,0.0004357541,0.00016076394,0.95390207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.783246,0.0011195305,0.000454848,0.000025843527,0.00036325326,1.222877e-7,0.000021998612,0.000023783652,0.21474466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964805,0.0002965087,0.00044647994,0.0007609286,0.001499064,0.00051647663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99684894,0.00023615782,0.0013535287,0.0006145319,0.0007282027,0.00021866738],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007539653,0.0005268777,0.00073958613,0.00018209202,0.005836045,0.00012110866,0.0018591717,0.00073927466,0.00059856486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035194444,0.00053232163,0.0005337833,0.00020335263,0.014616596,0.00079290936,0.0004636153,0.001222067,0.000056097444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016777635,0.00010483821,0.00013869614,0.00013242528,0.00051124033,0.00067277096,0.038828783,0.00006977757,0.00033846268,0.9560188,0.0018412969,0.0011751455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016619228,0.0003705556,0.002952974,0.0006802446,0.0013415136,0.00015513517,0.1462496,0.00016413727,0.00012093535,0.01869756,0.8260985,0.0015069244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008165062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025916088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93732125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004590042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014173638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572354882","doi":"10.4102/apsdpr.v4i2.114","title":"Alternative Service Delivery in Africa: The Case for International Regional Organisations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Africa’s Public Service Delivery and Performance Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Service delivery framework; Corporate governance; State (computer science); Regional science; Population; Political science; Work (physics); Service (business); Harmonization; Regional integration; Economic growth; Public administration; Geography; Business; Sociology; International trade; Economics; Marketing; Engineering","score_opus":0.0878023863314305,"score_gpt":0.31164680710534076,"score_spread":0.22384442077391026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2572354882","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35497037,0.10904827,0.00035324268,0.48388296,0.002045944,0.004124666,0.0003845068,0.00029814223,0.044891883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9204144,0.07235949,0.00030421506,0.005336956,0.0005141183,0.00033450985,0.000018408831,0.000021986261,0.0006959294],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997719,0.0003080651,0.0005083466,0.0004352936,0.00045284763,0.00057648483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968702,0.0009735665,0.00025985064,0.00037081292,0.0013356591,0.00018986169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018593415,0.00023314886,0.00031141916,0.0001348057,0.0007600087,0.00015558963,0.00092383125,0.00011484713,0.00048265568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044424395,0.00014914453,0.000085277505,0.0012147798,0.00019452939,0.0016437477,0.00023655109,0.00019189605,0.00014920077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003317739,0.0007966439,0.014655663,0.0046603275,0.00073077634,0.00025957596,0.3400619,0.000028977183,0.00009571183,0.13814487,0.067444324,0.43278947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048484385,0.00003874394,0.00022283592,0.0008112629,0.00005949544,0.000052506966,0.0037477463,0.00057644234,0.0000037553627,0.00072234357,0.99301064,0.00026938165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015718783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004138681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9255663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026138514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036148066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60819376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2585827466","doi":"","title":"Migration Governance and Migration Rights in the Southern African Development Community (SADC): Attempts at Harmonization in a Disharmonious Region","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Department for International Development; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Political science; Harmonization; International trade; Corporate governance; Development economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.03685802613868033,"score_gpt":0.24971520603611647,"score_spread":0.21285717989743613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2585827466","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97891414,0.00023195543,0.00008453364,0.003348325,0.0000955072,0.00046404847,0.000013675958,0.000058341884,0.016789496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974868,0.000034301658,0.00028893823,0.00009021692,0.000030589053,0.000005726665,0.000033935707,0.000009876927,0.0020195618],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964153,0.0020998681,0.00023947305,0.0002676068,0.00064080104,0.00033692567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988846,0.00020666668,0.00018912223,0.00037735738,0.00018350041,0.00015871853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017292238,0.00017614754,0.0001872106,0.00022770776,0.0012803989,0.00018863333,0.0006888911,0.00015455342,0.000008729167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003411133,0.00016683173,0.000034357075,0.0014490944,0.0003382277,0.00096710795,0.00021878441,0.0006196126,0.000027711874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014541294,0.00021773233,0.38626936,0.000008627051,0.000013695575,0.000092341776,0.60309154,0.000046842924,0.000017922976,0.007904718,0.0014847083,0.00070709444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001172893,0.000050997176,0.056404624,0.00008095492,0.00002314897,0.0000030891952,0.053844202,0.00009993207,0.000076393146,0.0009465217,0.88695264,0.00034461592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03280132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5991835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88546795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014861809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025739562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9847923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586306443","doi":"10.3130/aija.69.77_2","title":"CONSIDERATIONS ON FORMATION, DESTRUCTION AND REDEVELOPMENT OF DISTRICT SIX (CAPE TOWN, SOUTH AFRICA)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redevelopment; Zoning; Quarter (Canadian coin); Cape; Slum; Colonialism; Geography; Plan (archaeology); Malay; Economic shortage; Space (punctuation); Environmental planning; Archaeology; Political science; Sociology; Law; Demography; Computer science","score_opus":0.022961142873072216,"score_gpt":0.27276466615906086,"score_spread":0.24980352328598865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586306443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86620116,0.0010365684,0.1242878,0.002626061,0.000409573,0.00022485969,0.000045286495,0.00002211165,0.005146575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814969,0.000052939224,0.01830353,0.000020568483,0.00007753501,0.0000011570784,9.750676e-7,0.0000045449474,0.00004189341],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989905,0.000060175746,0.0004181702,0.00008174175,0.0003210919,0.00012834677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904823,0.00021806781,0.0003615628,0.000067970475,0.00020223785,0.00010194261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032753716,0.000090108384,0.00020035173,0.0002459388,0.0003572283,0.00003809694,0.00006899216,0.00007620859,0.000034057102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019835493,0.00007510592,0.000058307385,0.0002087927,0.00021551692,0.00021234778,0.0000042730458,0.0002585855,2.4659147e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024559238,0.00013397138,0.0014955654,0.00007363213,0.0001621109,0.000019140412,0.93965226,0.045266822,0.001310162,0.0017394506,0.00027331055,0.009627986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01966222,0.011368054,0.07433378,0.007113032,0.0025206467,0.0023199858,0.42114916,0.00030899214,0.07368379,0.20498702,0.17914231,0.0034110153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005994726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037367616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51850307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044243527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016877719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30627307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592597033","doi":"","title":"Responsible Government in Nova Scotia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œWashington historical quarterly","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); History; Government (linguistics); Genealogy; Geography; Archaeology; Philosophy; Engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.016714909257411193,"score_gpt":0.2785677344851311,"score_spread":0.2618528252277199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592597033","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.597525,0.00079557166,0.00043291712,0.017402517,0.015750214,0.0009898926,0.000014836027,0.00042158097,0.36666745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854939,0.00000149388,0.00090563676,0.00029427567,0.0007904151,0.000013636413,7.457787e-7,0.000025616093,0.012474308],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968948,0.00038930235,0.00041794626,0.0004071594,0.0012589497,0.00063184847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983848,0.0005597894,0.00014294016,0.0006071788,0.00006429758,0.0002410395],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001988419,0.00018527065,0.0002501963,0.00006989002,0.000399612,0.00017268393,0.0010118473,0.00024401334,0.0005780019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003341795,0.00015223758,0.000114413546,0.0006945403,0.00031180066,0.00031450935,0.000046122786,0.00096350635,0.000843445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032195196,0.00080410804,0.022435872,0.000021221307,0.000050161012,0.00013171443,0.71139824,0.0000062135714,0.008105985,0.12745284,0.0858911,0.04338058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027855666,0.00017135925,0.0016022208,0.000008959516,0.000014485612,0.0000010666173,0.0025659213,0.000026060256,0.00003176243,0.0029910898,0.99206436,0.0002441436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028986296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16408789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9061733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001914334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024905356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602041320","doi":"","title":"The validity of historical aboriginal treaty rights : the Canadian experience : aantekeninge","year":2006,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Tydskrif vir die suid-afrikaanse reg","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Indigenous; Political science; Law; Indigenous rights; Land rights; Human rights; History; Ethnology","score_opus":0.026954262350276273,"score_gpt":0.3107086171061892,"score_spread":0.28375435475591293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602041320","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48963234,0.025173385,0.00012587242,0.018539649,0.008002399,0.0019570403,0.0003058634,0.0003184503,0.455945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9567272,0.0002956324,0.00020257718,0.00007872106,0.0022327946,0.00011117628,0.000013888459,0.0000611999,0.040276777],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99160016,0.0016434923,0.001312445,0.0010273091,0.002192259,0.0022243129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949516,0.001403906,0.00068402925,0.0016860901,0.00056853134,0.00070580933],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002536207,0.0007488261,0.00084960076,0.00018986975,0.0067030736,0.00054751174,0.002732497,0.0006284814,0.0002836432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029238506,0.00046899176,0.00058632804,0.0014559858,0.0040666466,0.00045211433,0.00014121925,0.0010190408,0.00027864616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000430531,0.0009802767,0.04944901,0.00011888613,0.00029501706,0.00067486876,0.5261582,0.00008851165,0.0004263809,0.24126679,0.1767291,0.0033824244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040245306,0.00016012815,0.0044665146,0.00006814938,0.00015334469,0.0000059418326,0.0025761256,0.000053881937,0.00062617095,0.0057017244,0.9851636,0.00062192784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9212208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92560697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80843455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00428723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022364738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606452615","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.39.4.453","title":"A Critical Evaluation of Attitudes towards Nuclear, Joint and Extended Family Structures among People of Indian Origin in Durban, South Africa","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Westernization; Reflexivity; Sociology; Situated; Extended family; Nuclear family; Perspective (graphical); Gender studies; Social science; Geography; Political science; Anthropology; Law","score_opus":0.21977888678953023,"score_gpt":0.4281287374795857,"score_spread":0.20834985069005546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606452615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9781182,0.01521451,0.000010675559,0.00012354256,0.00027591566,0.000249061,0.000010460979,0.000007594401,0.0059900656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998272,0.00042685948,0.0011517584,0.000018746101,0.00009410666,0.0000055058313,2.113423e-7,0.00000858471,0.000022247223],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99640316,0.0007996312,0.00086777343,0.00018213938,0.0014724822,0.00027478745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99669355,0.0004018271,0.0006309122,0.00012190707,0.0020353298,0.0001164925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001765606,0.0001831415,0.0009753863,0.00032034877,0.00026555077,0.00002694812,0.00023749271,0.000085964566,0.000017709901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016672395,0.00014568266,0.00012643509,0.0005219344,0.0019446875,0.0004027759,0.00008498705,0.00030616266,0.000001281781],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011878323,0.00016659594,0.08574682,0.000059420614,0.0002353073,0.000018930014,0.9089142,0.00017528342,0.0004053029,0.0033468585,0.00067537435,0.00013711574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074809155,0.000298959,0.81803155,0.00015573458,0.00009159019,0.000002659642,0.17610742,0.0000463637,0.000114623195,0.004018185,0.00025598385,0.00012881949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003853779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004375956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7328068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020125954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004203487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71652824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606686253","doi":"","title":"The constitutional phenomenon of parliamentary privilege and immunity in South Africa : a comparison with jurisdictions in Britain, Canada and France","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Law; Privilege (computing); Political science; Legislation; Doctrine; Politics","score_opus":0.02747202688656342,"score_gpt":0.2822475937560583,"score_spread":0.2547755668694949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606686253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96173954,0.0065534445,0.00034131506,0.001473429,0.00014591486,0.00018377294,0.00019045422,0.0000038817425,0.029368263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993862,0.0001006021,0.00016889095,0.000020267407,0.00005306412,0.0000049893847,6.212577e-7,0.0000031917755,0.00026221137],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987509,0.00019338322,0.00040917704,0.00011483488,0.00036491337,0.00016678133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998796,0.00050277147,0.00032408294,0.000063181666,0.00022539728,0.00008856791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004938834,0.00010032949,0.00024839918,0.0000704515,0.00030145288,0.000046543177,0.00020921856,0.00003154508,0.000026170097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006203594,0.000060294813,0.000019162288,0.0001339061,0.0020231607,0.00020522128,0.000057078054,0.00019188346,7.554419e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047512876,0.00018648422,0.4568331,0.0000086219325,0.0001601349,0.00001635483,0.4213946,0.000043598728,0.000109379034,0.11950382,0.0001801172,0.0010886866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0057317587,0.00060081924,0.08496698,0.00093925116,0.00006998496,0.0000244751,0.3239372,0.00021160692,0.00009379882,0.014765358,0.5680985,0.00056025124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032676876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30542383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5679184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014208184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026155094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9737646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610411114","doi":"","title":"The various policy options for the settlement of disputes in residential community schemes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review = Stellenbosch Regstydskrif","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Arbitration; Dispute resolution; Law; Political science; Settlement (finance); Alternative dispute resolution; Public administration; Mediation; Leasehold estate; Business","score_opus":0.03562624560871863,"score_gpt":0.3707180090891675,"score_spread":0.3350917634804489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610411114","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032046665,0.5603109,0.003665196,0.12878665,0.0031170156,0.01587649,0.00044192275,0.0004464772,0.2841507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82211936,0.16610248,0.002130557,0.0026240665,0.0013184729,0.0010241995,0.000048678477,0.00011152157,0.0045206477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916096,0.004080418,0.0014571821,0.0004946844,0.0012060091,0.0011521177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882023,0.008269365,0.0006810851,0.002103333,0.000499894,0.00024404062],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011983269,0.00044507778,0.00088079355,0.00012333336,0.004165989,0.00024569413,0.0028322744,0.00023184608,0.000108076165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005396097,0.00028790516,0.0005091792,0.001307964,0.0023176481,0.00034604888,0.00059067894,0.00099928,0.000068531925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005117573,0.00019885629,0.00022228848,0.0009002265,0.00011569113,7.962776e-7,0.009909167,0.000022102668,0.000019285455,0.959589,0.010289761,0.018681657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064150605,0.00015531995,0.00011983698,0.0010681088,0.0001626901,0.000001341128,0.002222511,0.00009669614,0.00010275444,0.007068826,0.98803455,0.00032584128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013888621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01195402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9777448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024867567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005151039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611578056","doi":"","title":"Regional Migration Governance in the African Continent. Current State of Affairs and the Way Forward","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Political science; Regionalism (politics); European union; Government (linguistics); German; Regional science; State (computer science); Geography; Development economics; Economic growth; International trade; Business; Economics; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.009561877314595017,"score_gpt":0.2667672865665327,"score_spread":0.2572054092519377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611578056","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6586225,0.07015317,0.0044254945,0.24635148,0.0008052374,0.001157154,0.000023423476,0.00003578656,0.01842576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97959715,0.019405905,0.000010886371,0.000033155557,0.00018757183,0.000008982842,1.947821e-7,0.000005119423,0.00075100386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977425,0.00048650944,0.00024931072,0.00011148752,0.0005404765,0.0008697452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991051,0.00037884395,0.00028503934,0.00011471091,0.00007986448,0.000036460275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004216416,0.0000801044,0.00013390975,0.000026983931,0.00023090087,0.000046589663,0.00041573367,0.000022185774,0.000009588853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035392688,0.000035153622,0.00007006489,0.00020720734,0.0006035811,0.0002045902,0.000024458592,0.00054165785,0.000003915855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001974665,0.000040222178,0.0024514114,0.000002489696,0.00003027148,8.101504e-7,0.07054151,0.0000021548294,0.000026627325,0.78612524,0.00049639685,0.14008541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021516774,0.00013827151,0.00412402,0.00007753189,0.00003013057,0.000016206792,0.021446958,0.000019132227,0.000027259568,0.65151906,0.3202994,0.00015036031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006479838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022558607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32097468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037720308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069698424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99527717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613736125","doi":"","title":"Transforming court governance in Victoria","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Monash University","keywords":"Political science; Corporate governance; Law; Mandate; Court of record; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Administration (probate law); Statutory law; Public administration; Original jurisdiction; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Business","score_opus":0.028414062702570957,"score_gpt":0.31926572362056227,"score_spread":0.2908516609179913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613736125","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069131866,0.00054843,0.0000092239825,0.00027891243,0.018877573,0.0015596008,0.00012078558,0.0003405105,0.9091331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5884039,0.0013793526,0.000070701906,0.0000029233872,0.002785373,0.0000018918505,0.00011128878,0.00008108321,0.4071635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893681,0.0023607493,0.0005538164,0.0017868496,0.0037539455,0.0021765686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936167,0.00090687355,0.0007528365,0.0016971877,0.0020032758,0.0010231199],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023620664,0.00077613536,0.0011058153,0.0018676763,0.0063497457,0.00069088745,0.005429988,0.0021386927,0.0003934359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009100463,0.0010639974,0.0005291194,0.0029238947,0.001255076,0.002614329,0.00032505058,0.0035190354,0.00021060303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0061474615,0.0010024417,0.022776464,0.00079777575,0.00086576934,0.0155685535,0.3340484,0.000026765822,0.0045460495,0.5945664,0.018253637,0.001400271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017539697,0.00014239537,0.0013629525,0.00059490366,0.0001448922,0.000002473604,0.028752401,0.000008261131,0.00047813746,0.00028259322,0.9654817,0.0009953395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0354471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060410433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.947228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009728268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005822615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614273743","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2851153","title":"The Civil Domestic Violence Legislation Drafting Table: Where is Ontario?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Table (database); Law; Political science; Engineering; Forensic engineering; Computer science; Database","score_opus":0.015518685902076536,"score_gpt":0.2928823387591639,"score_spread":0.27736365285708736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614273743","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2662498,0.109361485,0.01172352,0.022601852,0.0060552442,0.0010539336,0.0000058095466,0.0003827442,0.5825656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96774167,0.0024293354,0.00009242061,0.00009502859,0.0008438679,0.000005714867,4.9880333e-7,0.000015966507,0.028775522],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959419,0.0002904223,0.00029161773,0.00019343002,0.0008770335,0.0024056335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988262,0.00020063893,0.00024066096,0.00020549589,0.00031362026,0.00021339681],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058434308,0.00013447557,0.00013828193,0.000043544413,0.0016940922,0.00042356126,0.0006855826,0.00010640868,0.000093660456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007796129,0.00010012035,0.000066803266,0.00041045112,0.00025249535,0.00054901326,0.000059068887,0.0019379394,0.00012998607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008499028,0.000059358063,0.032631136,0.0000032610876,0.00015120162,0.000017111206,0.48063204,0.00016382663,0.000022198283,0.42574584,0.0036162266,0.05687281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033790348,0.000109619585,0.00009560986,0.00004732165,0.000029065162,0.000038675313,0.030026214,0.000047855814,0.000004550051,0.32426244,0.64483136,0.00016940148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040326383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63120914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70149183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004115228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013415587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2617174980","doi":"","title":"Die glansende skadu van haar afwesigheid : die logika van supplementariteit in André P. Brink se Donkermaan","year":2002,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Stilet : Tydskrif van die Afrikaanse Letterkundevereniging","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Depiction; Pessimism; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Art; Theology; Psychology; Literature","score_opus":0.04257808848954566,"score_gpt":0.29135973236932583,"score_spread":0.24878164387978016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2617174980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63007325,0.03391578,0.004114442,0.05702294,0.00952463,0.007421651,0.003611317,0.002740023,0.25157598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682434,0.0013902915,0.0020853232,0.005704208,0.0038766367,0.00023453392,0.00042142184,0.00043367213,0.017610472],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98050916,0.0030068385,0.0033038394,0.003745128,0.0033782471,0.006056764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922574,0.0020466896,0.0013015051,0.0025799915,0.0003576843,0.0014567017],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00276753,0.0026141983,0.0026890542,0.0013040674,0.002635847,0.0018398492,0.0036195312,0.0013286741,0.013687615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006959745,0.002943377,0.0010763629,0.0018908337,0.0021503717,0.0024209833,0.0014006407,0.0042122668,0.003985962],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008564993,0.004176593,0.1604725,0.0013238542,0.0018833553,0.021421332,0.5749644,0.0019349913,0.0029878826,0.0032879142,0.16060221,0.06608848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0064178673,0.00036228143,0.0033535238,0.000827701,0.00059091515,0.000035818917,0.009474404,0.0017596153,0.00082066556,0.005342991,0.96666306,0.004351142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017082902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027672702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80606085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023052827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003545548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618913004","doi":"10.1080/00358533.2017.1326674","title":"An ‘All of Commonwealth’ Journey: From Marlborough House to Malakal","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Round Table","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.08129354360226068,"score_gpt":0.39928069530067356,"score_spread":0.31798715169841285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618913004","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84000313,0.00041133387,0.00022594098,0.0066976342,0.0008200009,0.00036010984,0.00006758402,0.00012064322,0.15129365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930696,0.000029862515,0.0012956702,0.0004520055,0.00064553553,0.000009850535,0.000001667654,0.000023529004,0.004472303],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853206,0.00022724296,0.00019407982,0.00018933968,0.00043967742,0.00041761732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981605,0.00015765861,0.00021171785,0.0011665976,0.00008770822,0.00021584134],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010177924,0.000101360194,0.00021184502,0.000021213516,0.0014701877,0.00050041935,0.0018968851,0.00008557632,0.00036977223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028669607,0.00007653052,0.000042379826,0.00010003028,0.00037816243,0.00065680774,0.00019649202,0.00017679723,0.00026810722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032719312,0.00048769472,0.091322765,0.000024017816,0.00019525475,0.000036287096,0.73473424,0.00029924986,0.0014146053,0.121584535,0.041895572,0.007678587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033788607,0.00010869096,0.011857612,0.00002654027,0.000046613663,3.1444446e-7,0.005449401,0.00005590308,0.0005302799,0.017589727,0.9637844,0.0002126629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14008422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01434474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92188877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009652563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014416056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619093147","doi":"","title":"Part Three Child and Family Services Act Table of Concordance with Bill C-89","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Concordance; Table (database); Medicine; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.02117728817160394,"score_gpt":0.24929470781495267,"score_spread":0.22811741964334872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2619093147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9126469,0.00063769636,0.000012571898,0.0013390746,0.00016401791,0.0002838254,0.000076722565,0.000050543928,0.08478867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956426,0.00013569344,0.0009004355,0.00007802201,0.000099339704,4.5586202e-7,0.0000055528167,0.000018397046,0.003119502],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980237,0.00014698903,0.00017340135,0.00046830453,0.000723135,0.00046449495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978582,0.00009777638,0.00061976793,0.0008486972,0.00030383142,0.00027167593],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088843465,0.00020712696,0.0004462507,0.00011316902,0.0025107882,0.00013364053,0.0015354315,0.00023217736,0.00021895142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012931964,0.00019828606,0.00009077838,0.00026857297,0.0019617218,0.0020194494,0.0005078692,0.00035988216,0.000039499282],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034258852,0.00008008824,0.96470135,0.00010261321,0.00011083477,0.00002741472,0.031160435,0.000006438154,0.00056326936,0.0017854619,0.00011782696,0.0010016786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018188677,0.00022543677,0.83203036,0.00044114597,0.000143144,0.0000029243556,0.013522159,0.000013401491,0.0006269306,0.00089572254,0.14983921,0.00044072152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009309187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019400882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14972138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008220565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017072624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620782846","doi":"","title":"Charter Litigation, Social and Economic Rights & Civil Procedure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Civil rights; Political science; Social rights; Law and economics; Law; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.02745461013366895,"score_gpt":0.3526265116974939,"score_spread":0.32517190156382497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620782846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69993865,0.00014035912,0.0000022333872,0.043738585,0.00038473617,0.000101244164,0.00001666442,0.000013489924,0.25566402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871752,0.00003149898,0.000027977434,0.0006695702,0.011076847,0.0000011353626,3.0879642e-7,0.000006944156,0.0010104652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991697,0.00007979022,0.00023413313,0.00009474321,0.0001950455,0.00022655503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925387,0.000025646043,0.0004323836,0.00005655405,0.00010382116,0.00012770754],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044703885,0.00008564243,0.00022383023,0.000044722474,0.0035201937,0.00048983254,0.0002295653,0.0001455764,0.000038230286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006956514,0.00007545129,0.000076632205,0.000019149584,0.001068257,0.0006537209,0.00004779504,0.0001742566,0.000007827168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000130310345,0.000012742354,0.0007625665,0.000010084347,0.000028284747,0.0000040066416,0.23328708,2.0785187e-8,0.000012676197,0.76274246,0.002593997,0.00053302577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000796747,0.000057995705,0.017489193,0.00001979394,0.000044892473,0.000007431626,0.0025704927,0.0000018731581,0.000028070825,0.17534706,0.8034423,0.00019412873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070223203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051542167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8008483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010498672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029926878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622699047","doi":"","title":"Redressing Harm: A proposal for the establishment of a stolen generations reparations tribunal","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indigenous law bulletin","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Indigenous; Harm; Political science; Law; Government (linguistics); Legislature; Publishing; Project commissioning","score_opus":0.025215637460859645,"score_gpt":0.32331715834525193,"score_spread":0.2981015208843923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622699047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19256292,0.0086290715,0.008265138,0.08815867,0.001799372,0.014170825,0.0010188288,0.0007879882,0.6846072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97416264,0.00005422355,0.01115454,0.00037709952,0.0005781282,0.0003293112,0.000022924816,0.000020277423,0.013300851],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840224,0.00020180545,0.00034154812,0.00022290462,0.00041970538,0.00041178285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989859,0.00030144886,0.00012554339,0.00030652698,0.0001968901,0.000083690466],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093944627,0.000106925145,0.00016204907,0.000029448162,0.0027266392,0.00021936923,0.00040723613,0.000094695424,0.0016891544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014279896,0.00008426915,0.00010256476,0.00022101446,0.00052689377,0.00008193119,0.00002310428,0.0001275868,0.000094014285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014164193,0.0004623089,0.00009718899,0.000021339567,0.0001088888,0.000007725191,0.7367915,0.0014022985,0.00028148954,0.22198062,0.026873505,0.011831473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025079647,0.000077232085,0.000016180757,0.000014370863,0.000047625388,0.0000013233367,0.0025625816,0.000048022794,0.00057294307,0.0012751007,0.9950214,0.00011242325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009654733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046682465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9681479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013037596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071446464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2631610529","doi":"","title":"Curbing Reckless and Predatory Lending: A Statutory Analysis of South Africa's National Credit Act","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Online (University of Wollongong)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Legislation; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12580478208903392,"score_gpt":0.3869839508270283,"score_spread":0.2611791687379944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2631610529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97377044,0.0004028298,0.0003322573,0.0014461542,0.000065730004,0.00022959459,0.0008636715,0.000050297065,0.022839053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890666,0.00016479794,0.0015313814,0.0000025837833,0.00009227912,3.652746e-7,0.000012222035,0.0000080165955,0.009121756],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668735,0.0005929755,0.00016635934,0.00034787646,0.0017570293,0.0004484222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973385,0.00093415636,0.00017546427,0.00024924154,0.0010444468,0.0002582159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027471401,0.00009370545,0.0003246015,0.0011880922,0.0004969585,0.000022952607,0.0006382388,0.00014427459,0.00046465718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015184935,0.00009167464,0.00014685171,0.002158915,0.0018509433,0.0005108823,0.0003674537,0.00024153193,0.00000872252],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006849215,0.00089583034,0.18906453,0.0001885028,0.002940747,0.00007671143,0.7405491,0.00006786502,0.00489963,0.035593085,0.006210029,0.018829074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028672393,0.00045034714,0.19743207,0.00039353725,0.00075554656,5.650599e-7,0.26509294,0.0013745682,0.00018928168,0.0020366067,0.52862906,0.0007782568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012859206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016201284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52241904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033068843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007895692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6819878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2701135309","doi":"10.1177/0964663917710986","title":"Articulations of Aboriginal Title, Indigenous Rights, and Living Customary Law in South Africa","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Colonialism; Indigenous rights; Political science; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Scholarship; Human rights","score_opus":0.039013163952688695,"score_gpt":0.3743865769613492,"score_spread":0.3353734130086605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2701135309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22661446,0.0038696516,0.00000262327,0.00028235023,0.0003282573,0.00016136628,0.000011161124,0.0000407418,0.7686894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958815,0.000031164884,0.00009787877,0.000012915776,0.00031651778,0.000007877004,2.1843928e-7,0.0000049326877,0.0036469954],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999289,0.00006200575,0.00012585717,0.000114650145,0.000201353,0.000207162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996209,0.00008106962,0.00010213266,0.00009176907,0.00007177016,0.000032370768],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025410313,0.000067245775,0.00017033705,0.000030031182,0.0015727644,0.00007439593,0.00014932599,0.000059778016,0.000035898807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015256157,0.000061189116,0.000035746798,0.00008370366,0.00096523814,0.00018381371,0.00007234928,0.00010224135,0.000035933288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031472875,0.000027079896,0.008504405,0.000011067987,0.000040367366,0.000008002398,0.80651164,3.3672237e-7,0.0000034720154,0.18368497,0.00079481694,0.0004106708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017700839,0.00002675712,0.034305993,0.000058805716,0.00005310764,1.6143866e-7,0.019542897,0.0000021075484,0.000011694922,0.015773097,0.9298258,0.00022256743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050484254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005026653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92903095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067413464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066326844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W27264515","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1021","title":"Aboriginal and Treaty Rights and Violence against Women","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Victoria; U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Indigenous; Treaty; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Section (typography); Criminology; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.006509524513361927,"score_gpt":0.27224665411809296,"score_spread":0.265737129604731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W27264515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4778943,0.0009940336,0.000022118911,0.00044439972,0.00020293516,0.00010986687,0.0000028829056,0.00003519556,0.52029425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961084,0.00082515064,0.0011848556,0.00022119365,0.00051174994,0.000011767679,3.616131e-7,0.000009533147,0.0011269726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985307,0.00017232694,0.0002007742,0.00020502473,0.00037666093,0.00051451067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899983,0.00008705166,0.00010905451,0.000117609525,0.00011884106,0.0005675973],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005105311,0.00013566679,0.0001844107,0.00004067222,0.0013819337,0.0005703618,0.000230021,0.00010109349,0.0004384319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025778718,0.000106650165,0.000030492916,0.00010373228,0.0006357094,0.00073384406,0.000027703773,0.00031511078,0.000094253075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003117629,0.000101606434,0.009757365,0.000016429785,0.00006636252,0.00013763923,0.1401861,0.000003421569,0.00020984776,0.8205488,0.0009797344,0.027961548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010058932,0.00016243644,0.003197085,0.00015460525,0.000026594951,0.00007369206,0.0050365045,0.000055512006,0.000087907945,0.50002474,0.48970476,0.00047026158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04339315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01513767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5191673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013653722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058765156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2731186053","doi":"","title":"The litigant in person and the access to justice dilemma : quo vadis South Africa","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Status quo; Dilemma; Political science; Law; Adversary; Economic Justice; Common law; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Law and economics; Computer security","score_opus":0.09857682815585109,"score_gpt":0.35440460100717075,"score_spread":0.25582777285131963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2731186053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32321036,0.011496699,0.002291301,0.09171881,0.0019935113,0.0010204584,0.00026742442,0.000039424132,0.56796205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964733,0.000110012996,0.000087437365,0.00017554159,0.00045196342,0.000011730389,1.7264578e-7,0.000007864815,0.0026819422],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982518,0.00041253289,0.00036944784,0.00016895823,0.00052521116,0.00027207832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758756,0.0014058485,0.0003098983,0.000113565606,0.00041117932,0.00017193341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013584001,0.0001350698,0.0002530836,0.000081382284,0.0006953456,0.00047573252,0.00084743096,0.000047191326,0.000085986685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006033381,0.000060666476,0.00007806662,0.00019565801,0.0011702458,0.00039986224,0.00015364739,0.00020878052,0.000043246444],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062899943,0.000038353755,0.0015685128,0.000002987181,0.00010199517,0.000009190322,0.7007781,0.000008077151,0.000037537535,0.29387742,0.0014500624,0.0014987193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018069531,0.00011247154,0.0010592521,0.00015886725,0.00006817191,0.0000068575005,0.15273815,0.00006764715,0.000030553932,0.01819847,0.82555586,0.00019671951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024903417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007849913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8241058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000099165896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006371483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53481066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737102794","doi":"","title":"Exploring the core content of socio-economic rights : South African and International perspectives, D Brand and S Russell (Eds.) : review note","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SA Publiekreg = SA Public Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Covenant; Cultural rights; Political science; Constitution; International human rights law; Context (archaeology); Social rights; Fundamental rights; Law; Economic growth; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.12042639562286035,"score_gpt":0.30720428929256777,"score_spread":0.18677789366970743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737102794","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12541191,0.07734726,0.00009185459,0.046197876,0.0024678458,0.001842722,0.00018681942,0.00025071498,0.746203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916883,0.005430219,0.0002516821,0.00042042803,0.00022798344,0.000070983515,0.0000073611186,0.000019810535,0.0018832014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772745,0.000338788,0.0004736084,0.00050147006,0.00045834196,0.00050033623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831635,0.00038949327,0.00033320475,0.00038083628,0.00029901988,0.00028112007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020250971,0.00022824142,0.0004045904,0.000105481406,0.0007381035,0.00047619824,0.0006085659,0.00008977963,0.0006709221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086817244,0.00016668577,0.000115261835,0.00029545272,0.0018232946,0.0014985569,0.00016285066,0.0002906333,0.000020280335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007949152,0.000039476545,0.0010751591,0.00004294689,0.000083417486,0.0000017387956,0.07986341,2.8393148e-7,0.00000443282,0.91437906,0.00082800223,0.003674123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056470995,0.000033097633,0.0012751004,0.00007218,0.000049018247,0.0000041543963,0.019267036,0.000007763805,0.00001185548,0.009535734,0.9689229,0.00025642192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018375076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010621862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96809494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027498175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002978441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73461264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737267453","doi":"10.5287/ora-py6rqzzoz","title":"Realising intersectionality in discrimination law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intersectionality; Doctrine; Scrutiny; Normative; Mainstream; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; Identity (music); Law and economics; Judicial interpretation; Political science; Law; Gender studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.05487928442682189,"score_gpt":0.34412506503773455,"score_spread":0.28924578061091266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737267453","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16551079,0.00010160736,0.00033523212,0.0006750697,0.0003961958,0.0007939769,0.00038980093,0.00009306301,0.83170426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.954378,0.0007054714,0.002035442,0.000011835673,0.00014147667,4.764386e-7,0.0015324889,0.000036691894,0.041158095],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939892,0.0019430058,0.00025729096,0.0007855335,0.002099915,0.00092504884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967435,0.0005662911,0.00034638768,0.00052411115,0.0013289641,0.00049077417],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029252395,0.00029433693,0.00057023834,0.0016041297,0.0017095186,0.0000856278,0.0019437801,0.0005030217,0.0003738347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005174386,0.00042491802,0.00027715557,0.0018196763,0.0020976025,0.001258102,0.0005510325,0.0015882388,0.000020530893],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034794607,0.00059375307,0.0046526855,0.00049667316,0.00021327497,0.0005631957,0.5804544,0.000059083974,0.00018368015,0.38946182,0.009555534,0.01028645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008718873,0.0001646061,0.005123419,0.0003353617,0.000056455443,6.446784e-7,0.37188572,0.00009183215,0.000010099329,0.033156373,0.58793867,0.00036496785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1172784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49668956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7905462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021916036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016910495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737924813","doi":"","title":"Dronkenskap as verweer in die Suid-Afrikaanse strafreg : 'n sober benadering? : regte","year":2016,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Litnet Akademies : 'n Joernaal vir die Geesteswetenskappe, Natuurwetenskappe, Regte en Godsdienswetenskappe","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01276365090172694,"score_gpt":0.2885596901187951,"score_spread":0.2757960392170682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737924813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70673823,0.07073287,0.00035491525,0.0394038,0.020122647,0.010655627,0.0037272996,0.004449089,0.14381549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8034927,0.012809807,0.0021997609,0.0022019548,0.007546157,0.00078218215,0.00032779225,0.0016848502,0.1689548],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9488774,0.00630809,0.009494613,0.010412157,0.0092688305,0.01563893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9709788,0.008723086,0.0044532404,0.007993729,0.0026491103,0.005202053],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010396904,0.0077214264,0.008279409,0.0038549665,0.0035078211,0.0020649177,0.009820638,0.008220895,0.0023220407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009801834,0.006906069,0.0038470132,0.0063305157,0.010098102,0.005213009,0.0051509645,0.008936532,0.015129776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0148085905,0.010265703,0.17982335,0.005132554,0.00940438,0.03588309,0.32677528,0.0024157013,0.033187453,0.078287594,0.13780701,0.1662093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01317504,0.0026186784,0.02325042,0.006457592,0.0015291659,0.00039754974,0.014492164,0.00072830805,0.003450278,0.012780401,0.90975887,0.011361515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010700125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013868367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77195185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006745866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036234981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99897105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W273928470","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Julie Macfarlane, the New Lawyer: How Settlement is Transforming the Practice of Law (Vancouver: UBC Press, 2008)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Settlement (finance); Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.009438984859168716,"score_gpt":0.294223176339749,"score_spread":0.28478419148058026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W273928470","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00000501499,0.61345917,0.00071671023,0.28090167,0.00031225395,0.0006181084,0.000008813553,0.000028700995,0.10394957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059405163,0.78639096,0.00027961953,0.08139681,0.0017696916,0.000014959172,0.00000237822,0.000035368357,0.070705056],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957277,0.0005687213,0.0004373443,0.00021308733,0.0011744285,0.0018787227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998495,0.0002974022,0.0004972609,0.00037789537,0.00019657268,0.00013590258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004769379,0.00020051532,0.0002859116,0.000022025308,0.001044431,0.00013993845,0.001065176,0.00009156073,0.00030769617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033175008,0.00011732935,0.00022789405,0.00025238516,0.00028403418,0.00082062156,0.000031011572,0.0018975933,0.000021207921],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042757492,0.00005074573,0.0000024850006,0.00001536586,0.00012744567,0.0000039942042,0.020150907,0.000005412268,0.000011650176,0.16631167,0.7968295,0.016448032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031557464,0.00019872969,8.6301975e-7,0.00011572935,0.00022703156,0.0000340688,0.00391362,0.0000026521006,0.00011553546,0.013644597,0.9812855,0.00014606619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001274722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003932485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19950485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000596894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022222167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8244204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742849623","doi":"10.1007/978-981-10-4807-4_6","title":"A Comparative Study on National Refugee Law of South Africa, Brazil and Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Solidarity; Political science; Economic growth; Development economics; Safe haven; Social protection; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.06723739448602464,"score_gpt":0.3495022068919526,"score_spread":0.28226481240592793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742849623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00063277234,0.00013752293,5.856341e-7,0.00014823965,0.00021558817,0.00045642597,0.00020948237,0.000020327705,0.9981791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5745834,0.0000010712898,0.000027063357,0.000058809193,0.000116517665,0.000004445626,0.0000033877702,0.000008308123,0.42519698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977809,0.00006153497,0.00025278816,0.00033722163,0.0013764075,0.00019111548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986008,0.00030137398,0.00034586393,0.00028024736,0.00033884734,0.00013291172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037850373,0.00020727703,0.000462645,0.000054330274,0.00055733504,0.00007608396,0.00043318406,0.00015450495,0.00043503314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014136666,0.00018159357,0.000046523273,0.000012491079,0.00077858235,0.0000797385,0.00011244617,0.00025917488,0.000034854256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016769276,0.000027718523,0.00007769716,0.0000039196993,0.00009629738,0.000008877922,0.12732786,8.45055e-7,1.9142188e-7,0.8657951,0.0066261496,0.000018602104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000250642,0.00012306818,0.00011080234,0.00004754144,0.000038764512,9.199474e-8,0.0062289336,0.0000010504083,0.000002534512,0.011042306,0.9819091,0.00024519218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50791717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9537948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9752829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000266098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011579192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7405171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751339960","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340011","title":"Prosecution of Rhino Poachers: The Need to Focus on Prosecution of the Higher Echelons of Organised Crime Networks","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Poaching; Law; Focus (optics); Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.038218407874290955,"score_gpt":0.3204868912000346,"score_spread":0.2822684833257436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751339960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9022381,0.0054711774,0.0005956686,0.055779334,0.0023508193,0.0015468729,0.000035648827,0.000038537488,0.03194388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998483,0.000091741276,0.00015758233,0.000071823604,0.00038158044,0.000007611935,5.727281e-8,0.000013901084,0.0007927137],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736893,0.00054985314,0.0007208437,0.00014483213,0.00090493803,0.00031060903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970328,0.0004954245,0.0011487949,0.00027881455,0.00095575274,0.000088412664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015195748,0.0001615258,0.00048641418,0.00009072511,0.00030876623,0.00002217957,0.000718323,0.000085291096,0.000029240036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014084752,0.00007335358,0.00022319128,0.00085180847,0.0011673016,0.00022362391,0.00015846726,0.00024102214,0.000002818852],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019723305,0.0010081833,0.02657589,0.00009698558,0.0021334135,0.000015957781,0.6865118,0.00035174814,0.051036954,0.20422031,0.017315134,0.0087613035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0075084968,0.010534953,0.15766177,0.0042317305,0.002229072,0.000021549109,0.37929812,0.000015738035,0.2312497,0.033325315,0.17226385,0.001659716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004051924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008260236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30721366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025959677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002215378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4300971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751432287","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340009","title":"Demanding Equal Rights and Treatment of Husbands/Partners in Paternity Disputes: A South African Perspective","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Dignity; Legitimacy; General partnership; Perspective (graphical); Best interests; Law; Political science; Balance (ability); Inequality; Identity (music); Sociology; Law and economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.06506849929916098,"score_gpt":0.37614340719717687,"score_spread":0.3110749078980159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751432287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97584057,0.0063929628,0.000119981334,0.002123061,0.00028672823,0.00020836246,0.000020389884,0.00001692487,0.0149910245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99845415,0.00044220255,0.0002633722,0.0000079419315,0.00029990627,0.0000075071234,5.7603135e-8,0.00000960788,0.0005152763],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978998,0.0003715414,0.0005558199,0.00022485407,0.0005328158,0.00041519586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980242,0.0007124267,0.0005563102,0.00011765194,0.00039431642,0.00019508255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073803886,0.00020099824,0.00069717027,0.0002450877,0.00029369307,0.000041423467,0.00022202566,0.000055197084,0.00001797718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007080594,0.00011348849,0.00014620215,0.00038773625,0.0012563047,0.00040374565,0.00006774948,0.000106853935,0.0000026821963],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029963354,0.00019411197,0.06067357,0.000007988302,0.00043265132,0.00015164557,0.9183996,0.0000026196938,0.00008648573,0.01800994,0.000076721895,0.0016650768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0056797895,0.0038632352,0.013616173,0.00059872697,0.00037546887,0.000019995,0.8891701,0.0000030951996,0.0007868447,0.022611033,0.06261294,0.000662612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023414602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025391972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062536225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015121621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46289068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751606866","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340015","title":"A Human Rights-based Approach to Combating Public Procurement Corruption in Africa","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Accountability; Language change; Transparency (behavior); Procurement; Public administration; Business; Political science; Economic growth; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.16568403885829244,"score_gpt":0.40130538978737484,"score_spread":0.2356213509290824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751606866","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29337862,0.0032242986,0.0014303562,0.021421475,0.001611519,0.0013912171,0.0000096270705,0.00010004641,0.67743284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951442,0.000005218607,0.0034855092,0.00006373582,0.00049438205,0.000033578523,2.7376944e-7,0.000013690619,0.00075941917],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969498,0.0003432213,0.0006943329,0.00025269153,0.0011412958,0.0006186566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749947,0.00012446687,0.00096696545,0.00032430174,0.00080765557,0.00027711617],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030959772,0.00019902295,0.0005449814,0.00031323766,0.0027522927,0.0005370677,0.0011263379,0.000068997935,0.000014852422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020089424,0.00015854287,0.00014153378,0.0004080229,0.0006773342,0.00077295455,0.00018960812,0.00041055,0.000010207014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001986217,0.0018552035,0.05262112,0.000123557,0.00053994224,0.0002380538,0.72574335,0.00046965943,0.0003110443,0.20042184,0.01339467,0.0040829596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002026041,0.000968363,0.009390781,0.00036434788,0.00010438118,0.0000052088767,0.060271177,0.000058209105,0.000074535725,0.0048365323,0.9212584,0.0006420288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010470651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018796433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90786374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067078864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021409032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751717206","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340013","title":"The Legal Protection of Development-Induced Displaced Persons in Africa","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Displaced person; Obligation; Internally displaced person; Political science; Convention; Displacement (psychology); Law; Human rights; Economic growth; Refugee; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.0845499542240998,"score_gpt":0.35671151932774603,"score_spread":0.2721615651036462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751717206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86951905,0.005576257,0.000059478796,0.015529456,0.0019899963,0.00059292396,0.000003984112,0.00002576389,0.1067031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960289,0.000078001176,0.00040346154,0.00000799299,0.00030240472,0.000018166118,3.992349e-8,0.000011554341,0.003149502],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975733,0.0003239053,0.00065775984,0.00015400638,0.00081738434,0.0004736153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976131,0.00031966896,0.0011918271,0.0002654462,0.0004948113,0.00011514872],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026628957,0.00015836235,0.00043585492,0.00012845926,0.002485372,0.00025191257,0.0009834509,0.00006769845,0.000006978419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040442357,0.00010538151,0.00013723849,0.00027199928,0.0010057855,0.00072645326,0.00018134079,0.00044492047,0.000005434947],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006627917,0.00027263566,0.0117350295,0.000050459832,0.0008232727,0.00019227134,0.9372151,0.000013736484,0.0017468423,0.015434878,0.0035875211,0.0282655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080370833,0.00030054356,0.010556432,0.00018177116,0.000055472072,0.000008261873,0.137339,0.000004685811,0.0010987839,0.00048358104,0.84893054,0.00023724345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011333841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034987677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.845343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036522912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006063159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752705834","doi":"","title":"The unity of public law, David Dyzenhaus (Ed.) : book review","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SA Publiekreg = SA Public Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Immigration; Supreme court; Citizenship; Immigration law; Political science; Residence; Officer; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03494857129783558,"score_gpt":0.31894811548732127,"score_spread":0.2839995441894857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752705834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000120100995,0.14881904,0.000036856385,0.15308823,0.0009207669,0.0009469218,0.000054163484,0.00044694924,0.69556695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8875151,0.023215804,0.0005960559,0.03839152,0.001754379,0.0002750722,0.00009919616,0.000112417365,0.048040457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918378,0.0018126646,0.0012559085,0.0007857859,0.002300369,0.0020074581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938162,0.0009970913,0.0007428596,0.001991392,0.0014534051,0.0009990782],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008264511,0.00047933563,0.00077995256,0.0001574255,0.0026801375,0.0017928117,0.0037084823,0.0004061415,0.008749657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040403516,0.00036363295,0.00041044646,0.0022229769,0.004122015,0.0048018754,0.00070982287,0.00088077475,0.00081642676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036961117,0.00014583653,0.00011570589,0.00008345583,0.000067088,0.000002852109,0.00296395,2.669135e-7,0.000002160968,0.7215852,0.25263995,0.022389848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037510568,0.000050754283,0.000089014,0.000090202215,0.000054464384,0.0000032360913,0.00067400583,0.0000061566498,0.00003539996,0.0033824986,0.9948068,0.00043230702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033230293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012860722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.887395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006736581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015446842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752856065","doi":"","title":"Meeting of Commonwealth Law Ministers, Winnipeg, August, 1977 : selected memoranda.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books  | UK Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01946732433891963,"score_gpt":0.28834055720422574,"score_spread":0.2688732328653061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752856065","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048847187,0.0004584298,0.000017289212,0.00078880845,0.00042746981,0.00039308,0.00007017071,0.0001271119,0.9488705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97943836,0.00013203092,0.0012876306,0.00020103158,0.00035559872,0.000015905092,0.0000052509713,0.000032982993,0.0185312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971048,0.00039987935,0.0007320315,0.0003611617,0.00078929984,0.0006127892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977044,0.00073807786,0.00048883684,0.00048790083,0.00032996255,0.0002508244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094744994,0.00022610804,0.000552083,0.00006741525,0.00035570376,0.000028893315,0.0007164884,0.00020302975,0.0003120575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004065475,0.00017926328,0.00013027673,0.00030527456,0.0014344108,0.0002267022,0.00014989186,0.00012377105,0.000033479326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020697401,0.00027350592,0.0115313195,0.00019366953,0.00013235919,0.000026782256,0.080155045,0.0000011293981,0.0010554888,0.8851765,0.012985326,0.008261906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008630284,0.00013216939,0.0004437608,0.0002270748,0.00005865505,7.62708e-7,0.0006344838,7.0957293e-7,0.001928083,0.003728818,0.99168783,0.00029460745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028284993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013193496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97870255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011453432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002861241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9781857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755209705","doi":"10.60082/2563-4631.1066","title":"Canada-Botswana Human Rights Engagements: A Critical Assessment of the Literature and a Research Agenda","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Transnational Human Rights Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Environmental ethics; Sustainability; Sociology; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.10623607245805676,"score_gpt":0.48209665959894377,"score_spread":0.375860587140887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755209705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05845282,0.05561187,0.000037817226,0.31047148,0.0011029727,0.006055432,0.0005158496,0.000078126825,0.5676736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99566954,0.00016464553,0.00009115714,0.00028711537,0.00016758022,0.00005456157,0.000008873408,0.000007996945,0.0035485388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538,0.0017213684,0.0003883725,0.00027915573,0.0018888097,0.0003423311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979277,0.00053051964,0.00014265167,0.00072426756,0.00056602,0.000108827655],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038480975,0.00014409129,0.00027901868,0.000041404845,0.0119330585,0.00028423237,0.0015914629,0.000065291,0.00071387447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001741337,0.00007263144,0.000108971195,0.00021156248,0.0020298918,0.00027021253,0.00011464834,0.0006485815,0.0000019256497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.2399006e-7,0.000036592668,0.00004182129,0.00035146263,0.000024925532,0.0000070682763,0.0052904836,1.1640979e-7,0.000008491983,0.99012154,0.004067516,0.000049075617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015607827,0.00001751582,0.0074545364,0.0010546857,0.00006920035,9.407176e-7,0.000031116208,0.0000019895178,0.000015245046,0.17658962,0.81449926,0.00010983468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09266795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56711525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9372167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001990523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004204312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9893533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755604978","doi":"10.60082/2563-4631.1074","title":"Evaluating Canadian and South African Collaborative Human Rights Initiatives: A Preliminary Analysis and Research Agenda","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Transnational Human Rights Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Human rights; Law; Political science; Charter; Parliament; Fundamental rights; Bill of rights; Government (linguistics); International human rights law; Population; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.17343914074143107,"score_gpt":0.4854186976573275,"score_spread":0.3119795569158964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755604978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38019058,0.04270672,0.000036395006,0.05114683,0.00016545459,0.0066263895,0.0006410114,0.00012888326,0.5183577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975074,0.0002209018,0.00023902202,0.000103005754,0.00013337343,0.00012892482,0.000034561865,0.00001141907,0.0016213706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953575,0.0020426223,0.00041693324,0.0004859698,0.0012071196,0.00048986607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975172,0.0005554487,0.00025856736,0.00053000543,0.0008086729,0.00033010272],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005484102,0.0002024369,0.0004541904,0.0003321093,0.018329488,0.0004945738,0.0008444932,0.00009162485,0.0007594108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021623346,0.00013377999,0.000106374326,0.0008402446,0.0027037987,0.0005352267,0.00006891118,0.00039245305,0.000013387548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074614372,0.000021998303,0.00033779725,0.00013021713,0.00023554325,0.000013588893,0.1349127,0.000001302794,0.0000032916214,0.8639679,0.00015827178,0.0002099456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010995393,0.0005044931,0.12064329,0.0011976734,0.0027507995,0.0000028280128,0.003840293,0.00010874526,0.000026788313,0.32410854,0.54469985,0.0010171257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05288919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53118646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61731684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020780493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035415514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766277717","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v6n1p162","title":"Ownership and Control of Natural Resources under the Nigerian Constitution 1999 and Its Implications for Environmental Law and Practice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Natural resource; Supreme court; Legislature; Constitutional court; Political science; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Public administration","score_opus":0.09625925455456258,"score_gpt":0.444332042772637,"score_spread":0.3480727882180744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766277717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18325996,0.005042336,0.00016720743,0.19574624,0.0003998235,0.0014963462,0.00041681077,0.000022320843,0.613449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982541,0.00009971153,0.000100599296,0.00028622794,0.00016552005,0.000040155726,0.0000032230755,0.0000033365777,0.00104711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899465,0.00023279194,0.00010168802,0.0001587276,0.0003594223,0.00015270128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997539,0.0020359245,0.00008707498,0.00013108476,0.00014476335,0.00006214333],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017213227,0.00004578589,0.000063944375,0.000024727946,0.0017062812,0.00035175626,0.0003162542,0.000048949307,0.000012588946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001328978,0.000033780714,0.00001521285,0.000017614659,0.0033734546,0.00044707104,0.0001345116,0.00014570412,0.0000023566756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008992371,0.000016902026,0.0011530346,0.0000034336827,0.00003044195,4.159476e-7,0.0034983908,4.394567e-7,0.0015552877,0.99322146,0.00003177208,0.00039851913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075028616,0.000051475774,0.014832774,0.000018840768,0.000017804274,0.000008135798,0.0055823824,0.00011606441,0.00023490822,0.022540515,0.9557625,0.00008428138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023621377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016524218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97068095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054259894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032709984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770710527","doi":"10.3968/9945","title":"Gender Apartheid and Its Effect on Family Relationships in TsiTsi Dangaremgba’s Nervous Conditions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in literature and language","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deconstruction (building); Perspective (graphical); Gender studies; Masculinity; Sociology; Institution; Subject (documents); Gender equality; Social science","score_opus":0.06260694584297503,"score_gpt":0.39065571964038853,"score_spread":0.3280487737974135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770710527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86327434,0.058991406,1.4396545e-7,0.00039217912,0.00029478184,0.00025636968,0.000042954278,0.000025562664,0.076722294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976795,0.00054915453,0.000029135334,0.0001939147,0.00022209939,0.000033540593,0.000009723025,0.0000076284873,0.0012753237],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989239,0.00032915827,0.00012701811,0.00024099884,0.00015038931,0.00022854388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921227,0.0004268009,0.000058750793,0.00020837857,0.000038135004,0.000055698496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006718204,0.00012385123,0.0002044066,0.00009604047,0.00091693527,0.00018351554,0.00014188391,0.00012274887,0.0000052100218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00149716,0.00009898344,0.000022679977,0.00013537543,0.00033398194,0.0002691637,0.00009723603,0.00039555054,0.000007531899],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022068683,0.000020906442,0.020949535,0.00006919357,0.000027214379,0.00020593774,0.9537666,0.0000010474846,0.00009463241,0.023321595,0.000735652,0.0007856214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003685043,0.00047124777,0.6191782,0.0023484263,0.000109924535,0.000012382143,0.26780772,0.000026216861,0.00018476951,0.012724834,0.09225692,0.0011943164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010907848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011639702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68595886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040467472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014468043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70524174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770867543","doi":"","title":"An appraisal of selected tax-enforcement powers of the South African revenue service in the South African constitutional context","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Enforcement; Revenue; Internal revenue; Service (business); Political science; Tax revenue; Business; Public administration; Accounting; Law; Geography; Marketing","score_opus":0.017108304068763822,"score_gpt":0.2753670594740499,"score_spread":0.25825875540528603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770867543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.754894,0.00034439148,0.00014292818,0.0005347267,0.0056781624,0.0015132555,0.0011151485,0.00004508047,0.23573232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957502,0.0000074564277,0.00016267257,0.000011969134,0.0002954625,0.0000042742654,0.00011207889,0.000010057518,0.0036458152],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99651724,0.00059098244,0.00041148884,0.00044525755,0.0017093924,0.00032563033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959375,0.0002395308,0.0016910158,0.00077262084,0.0012320082,0.00012727147],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086583797,0.0002683877,0.00052303984,0.0001743879,0.0016959155,0.00005328345,0.0021878295,0.0004347059,0.00006821421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007791194,0.00025243143,0.00024092566,0.00077498675,0.0033883466,0.00045272027,0.00008310399,0.00056595256,0.0000045281604],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007135079,0.00026595933,0.015536508,0.00023550453,0.0002161382,0.000033286993,0.7394588,0.0011625659,0.0008518277,0.24082503,0.0006238507,0.0000770156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018945889,0.00025886847,0.05549488,0.0012304677,0.0006501379,0.000007655071,0.7728122,0.00016883762,0.0007756613,0.0005027897,0.1653665,0.0008374079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023354927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016972536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24085622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045240464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050871004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771410415","doi":"10.1080/02587203.2002.11827658","title":"The Evolution of Standing Rules in South Africa and their Significance in Promoting Social Justice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal on Human Rights","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Jurisprudence; Law; Enforcement; Political science; Economic Justice; Scope (computer science); Social justice; Human rights; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04690604526550103,"score_gpt":0.29780502622233795,"score_spread":0.25089898095683694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771410415","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94718313,0.0011198659,0.00008302752,0.00039845335,0.00029725762,0.00040371506,0.00002522118,0.00003898448,0.05045034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987311,0.0000063047496,0.00007921319,0.0000074554905,0.0005388023,0.000011308309,2.864787e-7,0.000018231704,0.0006073264],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967729,0.00087081036,0.0006718151,0.0003083801,0.00064670254,0.0007294243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851173,0.00042651178,0.0005899126,0.00016455185,0.00012714961,0.00018015977],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002232238,0.00021966531,0.0003587884,0.000338917,0.0029238693,0.00023068565,0.00052854215,0.00012932195,0.00006600233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031752538,0.00014544156,0.00009663192,0.0007029505,0.00087607146,0.00024640546,0.00005305852,0.000765062,0.000012834443],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004082493,0.000074713316,0.00201354,0.000015154062,0.00001437603,0.000022436554,0.91474044,0.000016114338,0.000049444025,0.0826574,0.000042882013,0.0003126669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033767673,0.0007346914,0.009351065,0.0007741872,0.00012235396,0.000007064304,0.7297639,0.0008234845,0.00014081418,0.20716156,0.04651974,0.0012243453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011203953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006198082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18497653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075172575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008665616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99837416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791107529","doi":"10.7176/nmmc.vol6731-45","title":"Strengths, Constraints and Gaps in HIV and AIDS Education Communication Process among NGOs in Kenya","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journals & Books Hosting (International Knowledge Sharing Platform)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"African Union; International Development Research Centre; Danish International Development Agency; London School of Economics and Political Science; UNICEF; World Bank Group; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services","keywords":"Bar chart; Pie chart; Psychological intervention; Conformity; Thematic analysis; Triangulation; Graphics; Process (computing); Psychology; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Medical education; Qualitative research; Public relations; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Medicine; Social psychology; Social science; Geography; Family medicine","score_opus":0.02942231717054093,"score_gpt":0.37201229214433984,"score_spread":0.3425899749737989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791107529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81258136,0.0013891374,0.000016568041,0.000217995,0.00033826724,0.00022759115,0.0000063264265,0.000039708568,0.18518308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99632585,0.00025687722,0.0009893343,0.00004967141,0.0004960316,0.000023843066,0.000009946978,0.000018767,0.0018296513],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826926,0.00008408581,0.0005902113,0.0003323508,0.0003725318,0.00035156246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846435,0.00042290107,0.00032958918,0.00017169814,0.00043793043,0.00017352839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018719749,0.00017190703,0.00021785939,0.0004918558,0.0004527861,0.00047379622,0.00056089973,0.000148815,0.00014969705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023324746,0.00018486191,0.000031164167,0.00028669013,0.0007039789,0.0011624309,0.00023855432,0.00052489305,0.000016680726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002943192,0.0001582653,0.76216227,0.00003813391,0.000025382546,0.0000054248367,0.18391928,0.000008029922,0.00008028645,0.01338063,0.00012836067,0.0400645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006295863,0.00032023797,0.65611994,0.016570406,0.00011024334,0.00014165227,0.11501035,0.018178802,0.0011120709,0.098739326,0.08486834,0.0025327504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007060906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004884345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18374455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000356389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003323785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.753845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793895311","doi":"10.3390/laws7010008","title":"Living on the Global Peripheries of Law: Disability Human Rights Law in Principle and in Practice in the Global South","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Laws","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Context (archaeology); International human rights law; Law; Political science; Oppression; International law; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.027062429510614452,"score_gpt":0.3661809971483927,"score_spread":0.33911856763777826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793895311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63100135,0.00004277859,4.1136846e-7,0.0007774693,0.00005800028,0.00021057607,0.000008960669,0.000009957777,0.3678905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99935,9.459283e-7,0.00011016908,0.00037171543,0.00011716709,0.000015114601,2.979954e-7,0.0000026475525,0.000031924726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795514,0.00097461144,0.00022693079,0.00021777002,0.00035851143,0.00026705864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989532,0.0005813065,0.00009016076,0.0003043829,0.000036672427,0.00003423497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018936412,0.00009249865,0.00014371562,0.0000045944153,0.00039372806,0.00010412018,0.00041501966,0.00008118765,0.000050561648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000685912,0.000056021607,0.000024428167,0.00035572264,0.0024290935,0.0002706082,0.00013242397,0.0001554736,0.000009040829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019449184,0.00009484146,0.14035739,0.0000031197362,0.0000019657837,0.0000022479064,0.15714374,0.0000010852021,5.7749054e-7,0.7023538,0.000003179705,0.000018598806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004680869,0.00023009465,0.339661,0.00016435368,0.0000197286,0.0000013680726,0.062176283,0.000019972262,0.000022018696,0.13913326,0.45780063,0.00030320568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08436533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6233607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56322056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025073485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029948362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92173195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795423455","doi":"10.18820/24150517/jjs42.v2.5","title":"Can law avoid creating culture and religion in its own image? The context for diversity, religion and culture in MEC for Education: KwaZulu-Natal and Others v Navaneethum Pillay: Reflections a decade later","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Diversity (politics); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Conscience; Law; Ambivalence; Political science; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02303375758220615,"score_gpt":0.3737030121332806,"score_spread":0.35066925455107445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795423455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91209143,0.0042726113,0.0007301741,0.05897841,0.0019669815,0.0035200918,0.00009628447,0.00006354464,0.018280452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935199,0.0004599567,0.0030554715,0.0012042228,0.0005232289,0.000037138205,9.823798e-7,0.00000773018,0.0011913432],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859285,0.000083514395,0.00023531578,0.00032787945,0.00034679097,0.0004136671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894047,0.00025602133,0.00014242632,0.00008083753,0.0003402216,0.00024003648],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018733185,0.00011735726,0.00015732252,0.00009144567,0.0040448885,0.00046603597,0.00031436453,0.0001310173,0.0000025374754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014728759,0.000076661265,0.00004512943,0.00042638966,0.0017037182,0.0006045049,0.00015619726,0.00027303433,7.0783636e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000479403,0.00015109428,0.005430351,0.00009705172,0.00002213364,0.0000050963617,0.7717371,0.0000026413265,0.006992509,0.18731166,0.022232262,0.005538699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017105906,0.0007598132,0.0008150693,0.0003224236,0.000052514297,0.00008184877,0.025127022,0.00031891954,0.001719543,0.0965761,0.87213653,0.00037961974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015223572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012451988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8499043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002239379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031129114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796284979","doi":"","title":"AMELIORATIVE PROGRAMS AND THE CHARTER: REFLECTIONS ON THE SECTION 15(2) LANDSCAPE SINCE R V KAPP","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Charter; Scrutiny; Deference; Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Suspect; Political science; Government (linguistics); Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03111939339729341,"score_gpt":0.3405103882080994,"score_spread":0.309390994810806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796284979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38795546,0.006310163,0.001626267,0.25279728,0.0033425959,0.002043987,0.000003891836,0.00022566816,0.34569472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920051,0.0017000044,0.0000130331455,0.00017419446,0.0015713597,0.000030299518,3.9028208e-7,0.000010666309,0.004494971],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977145,0.00049531035,0.00014660304,0.00016506766,0.00038971455,0.0010887781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990807,0.00017222123,0.00026921878,0.00029789755,0.00011321613,0.00006670684],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036514306,0.00011131444,0.000125865,0.000035688423,0.0066975164,0.0008517724,0.0005779258,0.00007830888,0.000022793085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051238656,0.000058043544,0.00008052365,0.00014672971,0.0009399375,0.00031538846,0.000049288217,0.0017503836,0.000040179213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116197356,0.000036520833,0.0010635491,7.087014e-7,0.00008974358,0.0000012923879,0.0620196,0.0000018339722,0.000018988298,0.92291784,0.00026197342,0.013471771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017237653,0.00071122515,0.0014196592,0.00005250785,0.00010412715,0.00007926026,0.11310399,0.000077174605,0.000032502725,0.47548395,0.40689906,0.00031276196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069201185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018693909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6040496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003421055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007738072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796901051","doi":"10.1163/22134514-45060016","title":"The Methodology Used to Interpret Customary Land Tenure","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Customary land; Land tenure; Adjudication; Jurisdiction; Law; Statutory law; Common law; Indigenous; Political science; Statutory interpretation; Legislation; Land law; Geography","score_opus":0.07231443054933451,"score_gpt":0.3534564155081441,"score_spread":0.2811419849588096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796901051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41313317,0.0066830097,0.0021607599,0.012466467,0.0010962425,0.0002930595,0.000009145835,0.000021201638,0.5641369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945503,0.000095450065,0.0019113272,0.0010372787,0.00036793345,0.0000011872352,7.217537e-8,0.0000071879995,0.0020292555],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997234,0.0019203342,0.00027567355,0.000099344594,0.00027081874,0.00019985031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984397,0.00084985874,0.00023236274,0.000115090676,0.00020022684,0.00016275288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015550554,0.00008965359,0.00021910618,0.000010698444,0.00036384395,0.00016538314,0.00038696761,0.000016202894,0.000059487807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022903417,0.000054583663,0.00005011038,0.00010839859,0.00046514673,0.00026793074,0.000083438616,0.00024285611,0.00013490616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023712737,0.000051426756,0.003576673,0.000005791713,0.00013439945,0.00012976001,0.45282716,0.000041070743,0.0005802515,0.4131436,0.12203842,0.0072342977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002262269,0.000174605,0.011220962,0.000040177707,0.000008580404,0.000009262898,0.0018108311,0.0000043836544,0.00009349893,0.0018690597,0.98445874,0.00008366691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022385968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005029391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8624203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029350864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003530147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27984303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797246365","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2018/v21i0a4496","title":"An Analysis of the Regulatory Environment Governing Hearsay Electronic Evidence in South Africa: Suggestions for Reform – Part Two","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Statutory law; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Legislation; Common law; Commission; Law reform; History","score_opus":0.02600647097165336,"score_gpt":0.3086666323383723,"score_spread":0.28266016136671895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797246365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9556275,0.02265045,0.0057634194,0.0037746348,0.0010844376,0.002938277,0.00017591007,0.00034417113,0.0076411855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99505687,0.00081954646,0.0007945558,0.00012888658,0.0015267164,0.00022188156,0.00002249728,0.0001389302,0.0012900903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882545,0.0018459989,0.0018945888,0.0013098188,0.0024168422,0.0042782575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99407697,0.000709763,0.0017735427,0.0021301212,0.0006185891,0.00069101446],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008329822,0.000813502,0.0014183021,0.00063407817,0.0027791378,0.00037165132,0.002891863,0.0004954387,0.00041849207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095481006,0.00068255095,0.0012120032,0.0031528613,0.0025674677,0.0015905693,0.00029225953,0.002441235,0.00004122569],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025659343,0.0019490311,0.0333385,0.000120304314,0.0073789414,0.000028668208,0.24734311,0.019452408,0.007640084,0.67306197,0.0005839747,0.0065370733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00819467,0.0068589984,0.009923853,0.001058729,0.010036627,0.00006479696,0.062330928,0.010218207,0.008234852,0.03302807,0.8458325,0.0042177537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032467225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0446468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8452485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011852472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002949455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801111753","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v28i1.14290","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES TO SCHOOL RULES*","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.03890829450555221,"score_gpt":0.31985550496035153,"score_spread":0.2809472104547993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801111753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013702267,0.0012293134,0.00005445756,0.014063472,0.0009429841,0.00019578966,0.0000449694,0.00010661957,0.9696601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98422694,0.000012063021,0.00080826855,0.0017651782,0.00046195582,0.00008153348,0.000003844481,0.0000037410498,0.012636476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897796,0.00012910936,0.00007927849,0.00016621125,0.0004295197,0.00021790252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960405,0.00004908896,0.000018909039,0.00013306313,0.000035204037,0.00015967201],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003669191,0.00005079743,0.00006563416,0.000034158853,0.0006478783,0.00004041332,0.00027382316,0.000024505318,0.0115717575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016146133,0.00005369275,0.000034074215,0.00013316608,0.00025337253,0.00009226324,0.00017293965,0.0001358796,0.0022829971],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011941662,0.000046450798,0.0012070257,0.0000025991108,0.000009950714,0.00002156601,0.07147423,0.000032362525,0.000030614894,0.8911155,0.033046253,0.0030015158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070667054,0.000018331388,0.000333279,0.0000020077061,0.0000024260569,7.909498e-7,0.0029507412,9.934338e-7,0.000005743017,0.0017048944,0.9948301,0.00008003118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000112128546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004058866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97052467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019128078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013764162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99849385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886092291","doi":"10.1108/ijpl-05-2018-0025","title":"Citizen engagement in South Africa: the case Prince Albert","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Leadership","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public engagement; Community engagement; Public relations; Originality; Value (mathematics); Political science; Construct (python library); Local government; Civic engagement; Unit (ring theory); Constitution; Government (linguistics); Social engagement; Sociology; Public administration; Qualitative research; Psychology; Politics; Social science; Computer science; Law; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.21391069724016276,"score_gpt":0.36654543500319875,"score_spread":0.152634737763036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886092291","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31678253,0.0018211837,0.0026270018,0.31117073,0.0096758185,0.00057582353,0.000017852934,0.000081434984,0.35724762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99239,0.0000065803883,0.0004931649,0.00080365146,0.0028624649,0.0000046528658,4.4337855e-7,0.000010373059,0.0034286669],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724555,0.0007588973,0.00045100634,0.00014132261,0.0010137431,0.00038947025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790406,0.00052737095,0.00036180328,0.00015372637,0.00089375593,0.000159307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047928263,0.0001008545,0.0001340623,0.00027616558,0.00023803004,0.00038145768,0.0013946202,0.000078173034,0.000694625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035942858,0.000072782466,0.00010375335,0.00038550718,0.00071469136,0.0005610019,0.000115595874,0.00048648287,0.0001080397],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046808862,0.000121920726,0.011884937,0.0000036630968,0.0001555414,0.0017598692,0.90868294,0.0000057243938,0.00001518664,0.064758725,0.0056973672,0.0068673315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007152627,0.000076252574,0.0008979609,0.000049886763,0.000015131503,0.00019631218,0.162279,0.000031824227,0.00004360488,0.0028462776,0.83270097,0.00014752285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002127063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012337822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8270036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043382455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000430885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76056564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886131258","doi":"10.1080/00083968.2018.1492511","title":"Domains of Freedom: Justice, Citizenship and Social Change in South Africa","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Social justice; Economic Justice; Social change; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Criminology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.08095709864198207,"score_gpt":0.300244981895898,"score_spread":0.2192878832539159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886131258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9522485,0.0147252,0.000012345935,0.0028663748,0.0016331836,0.00048137107,0.00018476612,0.000025497524,0.02782275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99548554,0.00019176182,0.0012569589,0.000115235875,0.0024256576,0.000023082332,0.0000010105422,0.000046663794,0.00045409595],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996386,0.00039311204,0.0009881394,0.00039827786,0.00031032405,0.0015241321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99548984,0.000533632,0.00078460545,0.0002685322,0.0017143859,0.0012090256],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001980917,0.00037197274,0.0010793495,0.0011828769,0.0012305533,0.00009722796,0.00083773496,0.00020704762,0.000064835614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035109704,0.00036684202,0.000194642,0.0019652839,0.005816648,0.00031752358,0.00010166351,0.0003912319,0.000004708488],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050871095,0.000019003273,0.01109464,0.00018606697,0.00024343867,0.00036172825,0.9462918,0.0000026287787,0.000019567577,0.040119603,0.00078102195,0.0008296237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015141364,0.0011316843,0.02155523,0.00071222015,0.0006885934,0.000063257205,0.72663105,0.000024236246,0.00000913645,0.009774565,0.2368847,0.0010111809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0290545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76424855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.735194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013796904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009825708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W28862002","doi":"10.1021/acs.joc.7b01841","title":"The inclusivity of communal land tenure : a redefinition of ownership in Canada and South Africa?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review = Stellenbosch Regstydskrif","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"State Administration of Foreign Experts Affairs; Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province; Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Land tenure; Compromise; Land law; Jurisdiction; Individualism; Property (philosophy); Political science; Law; Institution; Security of tenure; Common law; Property rights; Sociology; Law and economics; Geography","score_opus":0.044231689386051765,"score_gpt":0.27526492582951534,"score_spread":0.23103323644346357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W28862002","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19356555,0.40271857,0.000010943562,0.0043765716,0.00062748557,0.0029325746,0.0002348317,0.00008217479,0.3954513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9351953,0.06352235,0.00028936184,0.00024028536,0.00008001911,0.00004494208,0.000008775976,0.000031238415,0.00058767817],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943282,0.0017383529,0.0012764622,0.00047514902,0.0013924316,0.0007894245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959593,0.0016978844,0.0007963225,0.0009428486,0.0003319366,0.00027170958],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029264884,0.00036446698,0.0010875863,0.000086360946,0.0010583571,0.0000280982,0.0008457587,0.00019459939,0.000092691946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012170327,0.00026892437,0.00018134255,0.0010555412,0.0018950074,0.00020799582,0.00038644465,0.00067624566,0.000008997819],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009489298,0.00096624315,0.2563734,0.012121123,0.0005986896,0.00042646614,0.3720155,0.000046628633,0.00014819675,0.31261694,0.017800523,0.025937352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009264173,0.0001448106,0.0022597932,0.0027142419,0.00011682899,0.000016467973,0.005326957,0.000019547515,0.00012077181,0.0008561964,0.98698187,0.0005161271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.65882015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81328666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9691813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033443642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018194849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887699319","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.2.04","title":"<i>R v Kapp</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Prima facie; Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Section (typography); Argument (complex analysis); Indigenous; Political science; Race (biology); Sociology; Gender studies; Business","score_opus":0.022998339544274767,"score_gpt":0.2750613597648385,"score_spread":0.2520630202205637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887699319","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43420905,0.002226366,0.00004576348,0.039801218,0.0016250352,0.00020096861,0.000016482587,0.000014604109,0.52186054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860259,0.00005165528,0.000096187905,0.0034844717,0.0013470886,0.0000029367175,2.4616557e-7,0.000011553564,0.008979936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871796,0.00023937538,0.00024184457,0.00009870458,0.00016267663,0.00053943554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998424,0.00018010143,0.0001702031,0.00015838516,0.0001753449,0.00089196226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023256985,0.00008898964,0.00024279693,0.000078653284,0.00064785447,0.00023372378,0.00048213647,0.00007166601,0.0003154078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036356333,0.000067631045,0.000071222705,0.00021219674,0.001995242,0.00023361528,0.000020814985,0.00024871173,0.000059240047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027515485,0.0000035497908,0.000566727,0.0000039891825,0.00003203314,0.000043772205,0.3454862,6.11124e-7,0.000001964557,0.6509235,0.0021484613,0.0007617134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058533734,0.00007588112,0.00010811525,0.00002931057,0.000013996752,0.000031983567,0.010647417,0.00000289825,0.0000088627,0.11797182,0.870431,0.00009339211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019166552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15827617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8682825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036672613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008628009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9873649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892686722","doi":"","title":"An analysis of assisted dying and the practical implementation thereof in South African criminal law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03286761464082161,"score_gpt":0.34888528235265354,"score_spread":0.31601766771183193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892686722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83080435,0.00018117164,0.00021241054,0.00019797626,0.00095614034,0.00050512457,0.00006008897,0.000027260621,0.16705546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976492,0.0000192998,0.0006600017,0.0000036819251,0.000117827905,0.0000017645093,0.00011835879,0.0000061000906,0.0014237652],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979634,0.0005005508,0.00023720856,0.00032822308,0.00079071574,0.00017986189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806035,0.00024485422,0.0008811437,0.00035148291,0.00036679071,0.00009538453],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091077,0.00014193296,0.00044305535,0.0002301172,0.0014668406,0.0000871066,0.00045698378,0.00025571324,0.00007417333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020609259,0.00014662478,0.00016750429,0.00034546008,0.0017526087,0.0006565441,0.0000383512,0.0002788509,0.0000010353908],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010193469,0.00010504487,0.007332856,0.00007508118,0.0006769513,0.000052384945,0.5986209,0.00020807599,0.00039354738,0.3912123,0.000017170905,0.00028635422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019303544,0.00010520761,0.11244358,0.00016827694,0.0055151572,0.0000020837017,0.8667588,0.00082843733,0.00017198276,0.00067823444,0.010961487,0.00043634317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053281263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05969747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39053407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031738012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093956816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896546039","doi":"10.15173/glj.v9i3.3709","title":"Review of: Bridget Kenny (2018) Retail Worker Politics, Race and Consumption in South Africa: Shelved in the Service Economy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Labour Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Consumption (sociology); Service (business); Politics; Business; Economy; Economics; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.03485706099039951,"score_gpt":0.31004326146990957,"score_spread":0.27518620047951003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896546039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76351714,0.1350096,0.00004901911,0.014955707,0.00080806337,0.00063802494,0.00010908018,0.000029861163,0.08488351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917866,0.004075307,0.00046277026,0.0028768247,0.0005395144,0.000004200763,0.0000011236376,0.0000060246325,0.00024761073],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978197,0.0007305376,0.00048338991,0.00018387222,0.0003084941,0.0004740071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989803,0.0001073179,0.00028399806,0.00020391635,0.0002679534,0.00015654798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030312096,0.00012498256,0.000289962,0.00005228139,0.00025860558,0.00015289198,0.0004948534,0.00010659126,0.00035756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006328962,0.000097249576,0.000049485545,0.00062859367,0.00042454703,0.00029325526,0.0000787602,0.00033953605,0.00010204123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010688982,0.00017159914,0.60589975,0.0009003538,0.00006601507,0.000081187325,0.26891455,0.0000029763276,0.0000045428965,0.10592452,0.01462324,0.003304352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006981783,0.000047474925,0.08104542,0.002122834,0.000039371,0.000033580847,0.0075679664,0.000011801016,0.000001847272,0.009028796,0.8991921,0.0002106375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006595303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011450405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88456887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025324684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000256011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39657226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898257162","doi":"","title":"Don't Think about Elephants: Reece V. City of Edmonton","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New Brunswick Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Geography","score_opus":0.024823107416675337,"score_gpt":0.27188806588370523,"score_spread":0.2470649584670299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898257162","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50006396,0.0036045979,0.0015545905,0.0017111037,0.0010394397,0.00019506017,0.0000088169345,0.00006772381,0.4917547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880411,0.00036376953,0.0041641826,0.000064387736,0.00058451405,4.389349e-9,6.5484204e-7,0.0000072901717,0.0067740814],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983082,0.00022720048,0.00022252415,0.00011788593,0.00067155244,0.0004526406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985053,0.00010210641,0.00042251166,0.00020156184,0.00025842196,0.0005100949],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009863797,0.00010919075,0.00027447,0.00008392993,0.00080780376,0.000027076207,0.00071589235,0.0001624954,0.0014662368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013522372,0.000119132535,0.00017979855,0.00027550219,0.0006655537,0.0010187511,0.00011461505,0.0003505994,0.000031313753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030478707,0.00042261486,0.116931304,0.000033898516,0.0002152966,0.00005107132,0.5037304,0.000012403035,0.00043500113,0.35288998,0.019818036,0.005155207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008538109,0.00007578643,0.017917631,0.00008278927,0.00008548832,0.000009853421,0.023974944,0.000002708656,0.00031898892,0.001488615,0.9550054,0.00018397222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10505778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043379404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9351874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018734006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006248875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899483506","doi":"10.4324/9780203125113-13","title":"Building a sanctuary city: municipal migrant rights in the city of Toronto","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Migrant workers; Right to the city; Socioeconomics; Environmental planning; Environmental protection; Political science; Economic growth; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.047393004482735854,"score_gpt":0.32385182790282463,"score_spread":0.27645882342008876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899483506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035256916,0.008052379,0.000016864116,0.0001779455,0.00043930803,0.0004812859,0.000019501193,0.000050972332,0.987236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8274158,0.00014570371,0.0010488684,0.00015616215,0.000762556,0.000012457759,0.0000033106237,0.000016955844,0.17043819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767214,0.0001623078,0.00045217833,0.00029711294,0.0009278753,0.0004883621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848694,0.00046567805,0.00023944862,0.0006121309,0.00007602557,0.00011980283],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015102664,0.00027527957,0.0004859336,0.000052030788,0.0002706619,0.00004635254,0.0011593,0.00049064757,0.006804252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000086602224,0.0001813176,0.00022778218,0.00004817066,0.0006319971,0.000274763,0.00018128593,0.00044360658,0.00004095822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011142061,0.00003001977,0.00024705008,0.000011275196,0.0000289649,0.000008816551,0.21019065,1.026241e-7,0.0000025893432,0.7878462,0.0006568072,0.0009664039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108754975,0.000022757007,0.00017567282,0.000089837515,0.000050833303,5.695542e-7,0.001092798,0.0000014253794,0.0000064762776,0.037269805,0.9609358,0.00024527602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33099636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.388795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.960279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032954264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009654328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99410367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899664618","doi":"","title":"Reforming tradition : a conversation with Remi De Roo","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Art; Sociology; Communication","score_opus":0.03070545907861777,"score_gpt":0.29519848350421857,"score_spread":0.2644930244256008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899664618","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9004958,0.0000941224,0.00037387866,0.00044059288,0.0001658505,0.00014734057,8.2534046e-7,0.0000730951,0.09820844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99077785,0.00003283437,0.0007662909,0.0000033849756,0.000511657,3.7092508e-7,0.0000023936955,0.000007109057,0.007898095],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981074,0.00062440766,0.00007130046,0.00022193098,0.0006472833,0.0003277334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883544,0.00021889112,0.00008438537,0.00013058523,0.0005226531,0.00020804044],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015771668,0.00006163723,0.000110524285,0.00013599671,0.002125716,0.0000683043,0.00021082515,0.0001235964,0.00008679416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026073263,0.00006868641,0.00002420709,0.00042529232,0.0013027387,0.0004136459,0.00005403134,0.0004718465,0.000019092997],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006763368,0.000080808095,0.06437272,0.00006655458,0.0000711124,0.00010505219,0.9186141,0.00001241207,0.0073956144,0.004729003,0.0008960878,0.0029801934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011459694,0.0021846644,0.019986488,0.0002296925,0.000037640944,0.000012182662,0.3282543,0.0007170863,0.0013122124,0.00086155924,0.6449584,0.00029980185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068068113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000597806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6440623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003345565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033154557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901208680","doi":"","title":"Canadian Tort Law since Cooper v. Hobart: Part II","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Political science; History; Liability","score_opus":0.07780419096957743,"score_gpt":0.3282948075439705,"score_spread":0.2504906165743931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901208680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9047592,0.00024348556,0.000014368797,0.004176434,0.00067645696,0.0003743384,0.00006597686,0.00030186278,0.08938788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9022951,0.00004213725,0.00006623432,0.0021193547,0.0007252569,0.0000015814586,0.000015733638,0.000040616615,0.09469397],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99667317,0.00044246248,0.00027982885,0.00067664776,0.00073026324,0.001197633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975176,0.00008955451,0.00013766799,0.0006738782,0.00028777984,0.0012935407],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072508573,0.00033163177,0.00033429114,0.0003362946,0.002259384,0.00048327135,0.0015282842,0.00039435108,0.00045010308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010571212,0.00040201924,0.00015043595,0.00081613363,0.0005965168,0.0030945842,0.0003546053,0.00064997585,0.0020898231],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043412347,0.00011979856,0.9386846,0.000012445005,0.00006746182,0.0004195289,0.027445566,0.00003188194,0.000034506153,0.03229544,0.00006768326,0.0007776842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004386724,0.00005688891,0.03538052,0.00006201411,0.00005191009,0.000004002373,0.0010202986,9.833121e-8,0.00018230676,0.00007579776,0.9622237,0.00050378405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014896946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9193265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.962156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017904303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009124622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901806227","doi":"","title":"Episode 5 – The Stories We Tell: Site-C, Treaty 8, and the Duty to Consult and Accommodate","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Appeal; Duty; Indigenous; Law; Context (archaeology); Piano; Common law; Political science; History; Art history; Archaeology","score_opus":0.031235272530211904,"score_gpt":0.3566375705211476,"score_spread":0.3254022979909357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901806227","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010440172,0.62903565,0.000012563918,0.026450915,0.0006112867,0.0018294388,0.00008549835,0.000065682325,0.3314688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.831571,0.16537593,0.000045865796,0.0023737336,0.00029709167,0.000043861513,0.000004409498,0.000010632514,0.00027746471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985153,0.0002833138,0.00034190642,0.00024422028,0.00032406734,0.00029118278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889815,0.0002561058,0.00017125967,0.00036627232,0.00015329866,0.00015491403],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016674445,0.0001725013,0.00043250626,0.000011540435,0.0009176977,0.00010103918,0.0003036887,0.000051195842,0.000033619628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015318354,0.00007825906,0.00006268523,0.00021097413,0.0040496583,0.00020370336,0.00025247925,0.00016568921,0.000019540796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002841934,0.000016236816,0.00019956508,0.00055371114,0.000017852784,2.4968745e-7,0.025543485,4.475188e-9,8.7643735e-7,0.9465459,0.0008716224,0.026222048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032067453,0.000051442694,0.0000678142,0.0012141787,0.00008363826,0.0000016684764,0.0005949467,0.000001361752,0.000022610375,0.002369623,0.9951538,0.000118230084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007057725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011056975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9942822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036965594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031041865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906192178","doi":"","title":"CRISTINA DÂMBOEANU, comparative assessments related to the proportions of different forms of abuse against children","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Demography; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.2834720507559977,"score_gpt":0.5885304650544665,"score_spread":0.3050584142984688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906192178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.958745,0.0016110188,0.00008233403,0.00018358688,0.00031419992,0.0013500903,0.00022698211,0.000031611537,0.037455194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99701416,0.001579706,0.00023390455,0.00007991568,0.000074760195,0.000061902,0.000031735315,0.00002529802,0.0008986312],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995883,0.0005820328,0.0012874772,0.00036108468,0.0014454932,0.00044090964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963414,0.00041744194,0.0016378403,0.0005827078,0.00071687537,0.00030372827],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011850265,0.00027804376,0.00091673253,0.00041059003,0.00083886454,0.00026022078,0.0034759918,0.00011960575,0.0040871017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050577195,0.00018880528,0.00024382207,0.0016217792,0.0008310674,0.0013058587,0.0006057423,0.00045733058,0.00001984392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014505959,0.0010313954,0.8658472,0.00003111876,0.0005098761,0.000014723528,0.08164507,0.00029080242,0.0024243698,0.0010981862,0.04528267,0.0016795708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048103917,0.00004140884,0.9768526,0.00034321594,0.00010265704,0.0000032104601,0.0026587814,0.000025340629,0.006107667,0.0024462652,0.010580179,0.0003576148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016891683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033713086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11100546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017374493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002953223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911000279","doi":"","title":"Araya v nevsun resources and law reform","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brief","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Corporation","score_opus":0.018462271836035708,"score_gpt":0.30150714718248695,"score_spread":0.28304487534645123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911000279","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0954135,0.00037725095,0.000007378868,0.0014960101,0.00020955165,0.000071096205,0.0000025391632,0.00009828057,0.9023244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852896,0.000013775898,0.00048038492,0.0009917914,0.0010339291,0.0000031756888,4.3847373e-7,0.000007220428,0.0121796895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922955,0.000049690214,0.000090424925,0.00015749382,0.00023108732,0.00024174018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995982,0.00003439846,0.000034494515,0.0001597156,0.00005676415,0.00011642684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031440856,0.000057821897,0.00008049771,0.000017503626,0.0005396726,0.00011608441,0.00018837543,0.00007192185,0.000249367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010193896,0.000050708266,0.000019584668,0.00014244804,0.0011938675,0.00017598094,0.00007128671,0.00006666351,0.0002255347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019874698,0.000018682545,0.0015564867,0.0000050867893,0.000010151857,0.000007986599,0.30034563,3.322128e-8,0.000043517124,0.68673444,0.0048454013,0.006412753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008913325,0.000037576454,0.001055271,0.0000070882447,0.00000415381,5.672798e-7,0.0020916034,0.0000021372332,0.00011934774,0.0032761893,0.9932392,0.000077730074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0151253985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055765295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9883938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056789235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024523473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99143296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913543067","doi":"10.5539/jsd.v12n1p139","title":"“Against All Odds”. Female Small Scale Mine Owners in Gwanda, Zimbabwe","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sustainable Development","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Odds; Scale (ratio); Face (sociological concept); Mining industry; Business; Capital (architecture); Economic growth; Political science; Economics; Geography; Sociology; Law; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.01656831201432625,"score_gpt":0.27416558831235316,"score_spread":0.2575972762980269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913543067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9312795,0.0006487733,0.00005804753,0.0013887298,0.0004920309,0.0003985141,5.278055e-7,0.000019057585,0.065714814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9376755,0.00007401442,0.0055802297,0.00032620644,0.00017326431,0.000008579421,0.0000017458358,0.000021661355,0.056138817],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702746,0.00018480788,0.000796167,0.00023024422,0.0008504962,0.0009108445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982644,0.00012321612,0.00043970937,0.0001782854,0.0006835047,0.00031093636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003074058,0.0001920575,0.00043063887,0.00045392243,0.00020283063,0.00015119699,0.00063400983,0.00015633427,0.00028124347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037053175,0.00016625195,0.000104652245,0.0007171748,0.00012648445,0.0004866301,0.00015982332,0.00040772546,0.00011714331],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030526874,0.00053861877,0.20478179,0.00026767256,0.00015726825,0.0022265418,0.77421707,0.0007587686,0.00026602365,0.0044877683,0.0034276438,0.008565565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011565611,0.00006938918,0.012096937,0.0001080517,0.000011223464,0.0000049351916,0.14414415,0.000008163523,0.0004053436,0.00023466662,0.8414838,0.0002768332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003670058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050565175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8380561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017879263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020246773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6779558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914307283","doi":"10.1037/e610082009-001","title":"Applicability of the Level of Service Inventory to Minority Group Offenders in Ontario: Women and Aboriginal Offenders","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"PsycEXTRA Dataset","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Service (business); Criminology; Group (periodic table); Business; Marketing","score_opus":0.07581112337648768,"score_gpt":0.3481510114547355,"score_spread":0.2723398880782478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914307283","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010191463,0.00010493532,0.0000032942457,0.00045758288,0.00034531503,0.0010151626,0.987464,0.000010002015,0.0004082311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0181552,0.000038797614,0.00027633086,0.0010720025,0.000109365246,0.000090495116,0.98018646,0.000012189709,0.00005917429],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99627787,0.0004881538,0.0007388712,0.0007615298,0.0010680895,0.000665509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973057,0.0001889861,0.00045003634,0.0016305659,0.00009274185,0.00033200765],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00186423,0.00037420008,0.0007169577,0.0001841105,0.00016166235,0.000045355264,0.0020911533,0.0004190948,0.0003890772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018158353,0.0003319848,0.000080504156,0.0008811887,0.00077133405,0.00022620197,0.00031457486,0.0008333794,0.000021200774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011921351,0.000358336,0.004509167,0.0003000068,0.000039085477,0.000003842354,0.017855681,0.0000024830981,0.000007555457,0.00015953378,0.9764642,0.00018089772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004157375,0.00007248311,0.015329798,0.00006574644,0.00005033364,6.303957e-7,0.0018734386,6.073297e-7,0.000002937624,0.0007199433,0.9811567,0.00031165837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7277589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93606645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20830753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083976175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088803156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917257282","doi":"","title":"Liberdade de Religião - Guarda do Sábado (Sabbath)","year":2018,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.029083009221670585,"score_gpt":0.3482533727593761,"score_spread":0.31917036353770556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917257282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036316827,0.0024799479,0.0006469331,0.00733421,0.0036003126,0.0004367832,0.000022415532,0.00047033376,0.94869226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7226348,0.00016321693,0.0013302927,0.0015712199,0.0035238378,0.000011074194,0.0000016858178,0.000047022644,0.27071685],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99569106,0.00046864944,0.0005429402,0.0007818928,0.0010237801,0.0014916799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765295,0.00028727725,0.00021017373,0.00088279846,0.00030729888,0.0006595187],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014319604,0.00038245134,0.0004273563,0.00012169783,0.0011000488,0.00062312523,0.0014148011,0.0005674017,0.01434933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008041857,0.0003587588,0.00024697042,0.0012008427,0.0016955858,0.0004940337,0.00043842476,0.00048735333,0.019481393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045601504,0.00015112909,0.0027589027,0.00002366906,0.000075403404,0.000040964333,0.5042359,0.0000013619782,0.00013803784,0.06566503,0.4231343,0.0037296824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033550357,0.0002736655,0.00038723275,0.000068761896,0.0000761571,0.0000030811427,0.019599864,0.00010877341,0.00080109184,0.0057786508,0.9720208,0.0005464123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047331396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001487995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.686318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043627768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061248796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920429397","doi":"10.5539/res.v11n1p194","title":"Unveiling the Challenges in the Implementation of Article 13 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities on the Right to Access to Justice: A Case Study of Lesotho","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of European Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Pretoria","keywords":"Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Economic Justice; Political science; Human rights; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Law; Duty; Public administration","score_opus":0.17611014894435315,"score_gpt":0.4456469987185158,"score_spread":0.2695368497741627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920429397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9659569,0.0042627132,7.5408866e-7,0.009326889,0.000054996843,0.0025109998,0.000018468058,0.0000039059346,0.017864361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99745953,0.0022076517,0.000006486353,0.00017174604,0.0000235123,0.00005139896,2.3370872e-7,0.000006636503,0.000072778435],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958306,0.0028709788,0.00048632594,0.00014252409,0.0005496663,0.000119918164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959921,0.002705382,0.0004241039,0.00051530125,0.0003492514,0.000013816914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034880193,0.00010363908,0.00028492534,0.00008747163,0.00036530965,0.000013381053,0.0006448541,0.000008249426,0.000028165548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011029281,0.00003556115,0.00007713314,0.0014031796,0.00045042028,0.00006758728,0.00015955363,0.00009853826,0.0000035627577],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022657223,0.00032533478,0.0020860825,0.0010269481,0.00015518203,0.0000015731106,0.9011664,0.00009601613,0.00002566608,0.09441073,0.00035791492,0.00032554267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019971709,0.00047032387,0.0075599616,0.0021894015,0.0002605339,6.53885e-7,0.9829477,0.0000023306786,0.00023735368,0.00009359573,0.0059798094,0.00005859687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013691931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076319217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09431714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028047849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025709223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42587915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920971698","doi":"10.1515/ldr-2019-0017","title":"Application of Y.S. Lee’s General Theory of Law and Development to Botswana","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law and Development Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Resource curse; Dutch disease; Law and development; Natural resource; Diversification (marketing strategy); Development economics; Language change; Politics; Rule of law; Development theory; Economics; Political science; Curse; Development studies; Law; Sociology; Economic growth; Business","score_opus":0.026942358629925552,"score_gpt":0.3083007062933814,"score_spread":0.28135834766345585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920971698","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071473345,0.20598607,0.0022321665,0.0028308383,0.00028241987,0.004602736,0.000008272267,0.00008337895,0.71250075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738571,0.0054655843,0.014819563,0.004420221,0.00003392124,0.000077384415,0.0000057000266,0.000010603558,0.001309923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891925,0.00014044342,0.0003380967,0.00016759457,0.00027451786,0.0001600927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994583,0.00008228845,0.00012630508,0.0001880017,0.00007185798,0.00007321593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015951429,0.000095546115,0.00028142374,0.000013822158,0.00018046083,0.000015063687,0.00021686201,0.000036065976,0.00007414141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024049888,0.000063479645,0.000017640788,0.00011440103,0.00022354885,0.000062295294,0.00012973438,0.000048793554,0.000075929085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007775467,0.00001810124,0.0007704068,0.00067545555,0.000027423208,1.5402027e-7,0.032784455,3.9710628e-7,0.000055809713,0.9214341,0.000109007524,0.044116907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007902761,0.000009756524,0.00071162166,0.00034369528,0.000012279035,3.7762624e-7,0.0002216374,3.0221176e-7,0.00054546143,0.0010845857,0.996891,0.00010021715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002535843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019324268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.996782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003220214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013281142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2588625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944152752","doi":"10.22215/etd/2017-12724","title":"Trade Unions and Noncitizens in South Africa: Towards an Organizational Norm of Differentiated Universalism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Xenophobia; Universalism; Norm (philosophy); Political science; Immigration; Embodied cognition; Racism; Cosmopolitanism; Working class; Ethnic group; Institution; Nationality; Sociology; Gender studies; Political economy; Law; Development economics","score_opus":0.023616993632970675,"score_gpt":0.30043629136954725,"score_spread":0.2768192977365766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944152752","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40846577,0.00020468891,0.000014565342,0.00018122594,0.0005619528,0.00035439368,0.00021955573,0.000091397575,0.58990645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9671705,0.000036429603,0.0001698763,0.0000087158905,0.000098341356,0.0000037710367,0.0006974055,0.000027500295,0.03178746],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849534,0.00014745508,0.00027122514,0.00031859044,0.00049923774,0.0002681388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908394,0.00005085166,0.0002755263,0.00025811634,0.00017159301,0.00015998176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020772388,0.00019122913,0.00034438222,0.00022569545,0.00036665297,0.00010334433,0.00049107487,0.00042807325,0.00061943743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030224212,0.00018945422,0.000046835426,0.0003471877,0.00030721602,0.00023278368,0.000028559096,0.00023880987,0.0000052765085],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023251894,0.0000864995,0.002214513,0.000033713466,0.000033474156,0.0000070429783,0.9138682,0.0000010169265,0.00014155856,0.0832151,0.000080638194,0.00029498627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028293938,0.000227072,0.36977786,0.000436497,0.00046468055,7.0424574e-7,0.57287467,0.000120801094,0.0010663393,0.019323746,0.03098471,0.0018935372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031832804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012891007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55870473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011074235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006005761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7725719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945074637","doi":"10.1080/00083968.2019.1598452","title":"The Janus face of legal pluralism for the rule of law promotion in sub-Saharan Africa","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Central European University","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Rule of law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Dialectic; Sociology; Legal realism; Comparative law; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04268643175071297,"score_gpt":0.2796468034743327,"score_spread":0.23696037172361972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945074637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8948536,0.06487229,0.00003153566,0.015917981,0.002650783,0.0021044633,0.0002804747,0.000017513796,0.01927136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969292,0.0009997857,0.00025489338,0.000044730015,0.0002982631,0.000050558003,0.0000012235985,0.000034864228,0.0013864826],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967968,0.00031478,0.0011193487,0.00028316848,0.00033379174,0.0011521244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943219,0.0020223842,0.0009933206,0.00046820444,0.0016426252,0.00055156567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028884392,0.00029154145,0.00084331096,0.00033732658,0.00096176384,0.000103517756,0.0014183697,0.00012214432,0.000016493103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031430922,0.00019766226,0.00034055256,0.0012057518,0.0026983842,0.00037588621,0.00006515007,0.00034190383,0.000002603014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020458842,0.00008791105,0.0037458027,0.00034407867,0.0009146743,0.0001081931,0.7414069,0.00069217937,0.0005214197,0.24494106,0.002496747,0.0045364266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006596827,0.0005673291,0.0018467787,0.0004044257,0.00016801931,0.000019768895,0.10684699,0.000040003128,0.00013880426,0.003749576,0.8852423,0.00031635448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078642845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7993506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8827455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011871852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011611964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945498499","doi":"","title":"Making Motherhood Work: Women?s Child Support Claims, Race, and the Remaking of Citizenship in South Africa, 1958-2015","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Deep Blue (University of Michigan)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies, University of Michigan; Department of Afroamerican and African Studies, University of Michigan; Wenner-Gren Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Citizenship; Gender studies; Race (biology); Work (physics); Sociology; Political science; Law; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.018030771241159312,"score_gpt":0.2600203560993727,"score_spread":0.24198958485821337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945498499","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9053951,0.0010906844,0.00004327124,0.00018932243,0.0003098327,0.00048113527,0.00004072079,0.00004193799,0.09240802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915329,0.000063103966,0.00074300705,0.00003406008,0.00013338545,0.0000014534797,0.000032131487,0.000033635417,0.0074263117],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758875,0.00042422654,0.00032857043,0.00045918333,0.00065227493,0.00054699427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825674,0.00019347575,0.0008245837,0.00041206207,0.00020023646,0.00011292208],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015806729,0.0002571746,0.00073623535,0.0003740762,0.00058928394,0.0000434852,0.0009315405,0.0004903907,0.0003838224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022003194,0.00028343414,0.00016828382,0.0008707816,0.001147357,0.00014906953,0.00014967173,0.00054899225,0.000030131217],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048822066,0.000030748834,0.00034473639,0.00009559081,0.00011086675,0.00001636782,0.99538064,0.0000046095333,0.000003743793,0.0028486468,0.00005383005,0.0006220215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014484384,0.000051304112,0.0025069558,0.00044567155,0.00014288755,6.695815e-7,0.9807315,0.000023511862,0.000007218822,0.0019807925,0.012324524,0.00033653993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002415239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032376256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08613784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012174429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019832504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946896408","doi":"","title":"MAKING THE CHOICE BETWEEN MERGER AND CONCURRENCY RULES IN TORT: A COMMENT ON YOUNG V. BELLA","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"BELLA; Supreme court; Tort; Law; Action (physics); Political science; Position (finance); Cause of action; Liability; Business","score_opus":0.06253256117679147,"score_gpt":0.3556093057262634,"score_spread":0.29307674454947197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946896408","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012883217,0.3893173,9.1064567e-7,0.29919237,0.0004299724,0.0017885756,0.000075990356,0.000033993834,0.29627767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98570186,0.0049895323,0.000012080449,0.008267517,0.0003622023,0.000034203633,0.0000047665912,0.000010097315,0.00061776204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849933,0.00048538207,0.00023029126,0.00015622962,0.00025386718,0.0003748756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921995,0.00027729725,0.000078119134,0.00027241392,0.000028851997,0.00012338243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014125517,0.000109160756,0.00021225649,0.000033142853,0.00072704215,0.00008600675,0.0004531703,0.000047145546,0.00021522222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024561066,0.00006630118,0.00004442503,0.00025904167,0.0002866188,0.000050697752,0.00003533091,0.00022044059,0.00011499649],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001744966,0.00002235564,0.15599965,0.00044085426,0.00004557497,0.00002937735,0.042356063,0.0000028228424,5.7626204e-7,0.45637012,0.295834,0.04889689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004273701,0.0000054125435,0.014815245,0.0006891913,0.000032268905,2.8843021e-7,0.00012197007,9.4598147e-7,1.9975924e-7,0.0005708421,0.98362887,0.0000920377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60463285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7876844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9728186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035236223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022646388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5591894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947891039","doi":"10.7202/1059342ar","title":"LEGISLATION DEROGATING FROM THE QUEBEC CIVIL CODE","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Legislation; Law; Scope (computer science); Charter; Civil code; Political science; Compensation (psychology); Code (set theory); Civil law (Civil law); Statute of limitations; Business; Commercial law; Computer science; Programming language; Psychology","score_opus":0.017030052240038472,"score_gpt":0.2679905076278339,"score_spread":0.25096045538779543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947891039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6290298,0.0004174835,0.00046257334,0.003629321,0.00055925164,0.0003698745,0.00002432104,0.00015116541,0.3653562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984446,0.000019084438,0.0006833503,0.0003518893,0.0010097367,0.000013194591,0.000014464222,0.000016986789,0.01344529],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987425,0.00020314276,0.00018261325,0.00023465649,0.0002802555,0.00035679847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884295,0.0005365554,0.00012286386,0.0003589571,0.000056147546,0.0000824949],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005958646,0.000071501585,0.00014122532,0.000019222574,0.00032251317,0.00016617388,0.00047047006,0.00011924186,0.0007345385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004388236,0.00008373741,0.00007915541,0.00024497294,0.00013122158,0.00021541193,0.000060400653,0.00021154858,0.0011266666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019346842,0.000040781775,0.28523183,0.00002404374,0.000057059733,0.000018137169,0.5070346,0.0005306855,0.00092852383,0.18877342,0.0040015015,0.013340071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007317513,0.000040439187,0.034263864,0.00028992488,0.00008365835,0.0000022491217,0.023779051,0.0029888079,0.00035536312,0.09481068,0.84200376,0.0006504444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04600917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12699878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83800226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032045192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014912258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948174746","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340017","title":"‘Lawfare’ in South Africa and Its Effects on the Judiciary","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Presidency; Politics; Democracy; Rule of law; Political science; State (computer science); Jurisprudence; Sociology","score_opus":0.06124879699420717,"score_gpt":0.3468832610474058,"score_spread":0.28563446405319864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948174746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8020019,0.03053028,0.0000028431616,0.028113613,0.0013004788,0.000382428,0.0000056427057,0.000022281913,0.13764054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99812734,0.000439954,0.000045888068,0.00018721972,0.0006857425,0.000008899571,2.2317792e-8,0.000011858723,0.000493089],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979597,0.0004158934,0.00034998887,0.00017075325,0.00069128466,0.00041239272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975471,0.001200911,0.0005983257,0.0002456075,0.0002685016,0.00013959338],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020100542,0.00016565087,0.00043904915,0.00011327425,0.0016329548,0.00024357779,0.000799616,0.000059070633,0.0000110439605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072180037,0.0001024864,0.00009980316,0.00018297446,0.00078455196,0.0004169151,0.00022114028,0.0004756191,0.000017652745],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017222112,0.000093138195,0.01577388,0.000028900107,0.00034903805,0.0006356252,0.88140124,0.000005910418,0.00005643529,0.095158316,0.0034466025,0.002878669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024235924,0.0016606192,0.064440586,0.0012693291,0.00030286433,0.000017058666,0.23101252,0.000013206537,0.0005737547,0.029960092,0.6674529,0.00087351765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014696862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018872276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66400623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013661274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011053793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949433261","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340027","title":"Private Prosecutions in Kenya","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kenya; Law; Legislation; Conflict of laws; Political science; Constitution; Criminal code; Statutory law; Private rights; Criminal law","score_opus":0.04397163548767583,"score_gpt":0.3736450141364982,"score_spread":0.32967337864882235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949433261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7326933,0.010114266,0.0001307425,0.014111795,0.002423953,0.00032999218,0.0000060957104,0.00005612387,0.24013373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956144,0.00026028574,0.0014884891,0.00010567299,0.0012594934,0.000004160262,5.9202705e-8,0.000008778504,0.0012586524],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982375,0.00023605781,0.0004774826,0.00012546644,0.0005359902,0.00038749422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986448,0.00019069923,0.00031994196,0.000118838245,0.00059846643,0.00012719596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012951745,0.00010997562,0.00032737985,0.00018336413,0.0004619688,0.00006747674,0.00042042407,0.00004628345,0.00005453599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017916498,0.00008771206,0.00009308843,0.00080977654,0.0014574453,0.0004533001,0.00010010028,0.0002700214,0.00004541476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013510924,0.00022357161,0.04648978,0.000014780371,0.0002854853,0.00024023461,0.79631644,0.0000074082714,0.00018010395,0.1413827,0.011455097,0.0032692729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035817715,0.0003602889,0.003999986,0.000080950565,0.00003066922,0.000007671384,0.050620887,0.0000012702494,0.00013732868,0.005014968,0.9392418,0.00014596479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025485424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009805425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92778677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029129736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020857115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5370018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950248336","doi":"","title":"Canada Water Kerk (Londenbediening)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Die Kerkblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Maar; Theology; Philosophy; Geology","score_opus":0.03358951895615178,"score_gpt":0.29075051444662553,"score_spread":0.2571609954904738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950248336","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17346342,0.0011155864,0.00004324769,0.008614245,0.0040068687,0.00027173053,0.000029038607,0.00022274099,0.81223315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97165745,0.0000059678982,0.00027050832,0.0008745408,0.0006334981,0.000011560997,0.000009149804,0.00001607577,0.026521225],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998141,0.00011976458,0.00016416855,0.00021775698,0.00075412204,0.00060319906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990691,0.00005495676,0.00003427315,0.00023531931,0.00017324006,0.0004331315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051223085,0.00011274958,0.00014604002,0.000029929455,0.00028471553,0.000085768566,0.00039889244,0.000079291334,0.00034296158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047594597,0.00008771855,0.00003473485,0.00012219044,0.00020229883,0.00018325786,0.00010389787,0.00014340249,0.00058898755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003617507,0.000056910983,0.012800769,0.000010692719,0.000057211728,0.00035182992,0.4593136,0.00003432239,0.000081715414,0.010622087,0.51357096,0.0030637556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017899908,0.000015334497,0.0001287172,0.0000048014326,0.00000860992,4.0061292e-7,0.0054438063,0.0000078614175,0.00044830772,0.000950526,0.9926562,0.00015645649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9165427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9124015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79819405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040319297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010774202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75704396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951447645","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199482139.003.0016","title":"Three Models of Affirmative Action through the Lens of Separation of Powers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Political science; Action (physics); Perspective (graphical); Identification (biology); Set (abstract data type); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.08699701251397882,"score_gpt":0.30324818611989984,"score_spread":0.21625117360592103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951447645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000585082,0.00006803663,0.003622405,0.000029101937,0.00018468326,0.00046348386,0.00014575105,0.000026400852,0.9948751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3912164,0.00027581523,0.0007583373,0.000011512645,0.00012304606,6.793369e-7,0.0000115212015,0.000023795566,0.60757893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880266,0.00007922838,0.00023889281,0.0001958732,0.0005292422,0.0001540743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819815,0.00013723568,0.00079943077,0.0003707358,0.0004626839,0.00003174179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020582663,0.00016178859,0.00033779882,0.00007103242,0.00021263011,0.00000897566,0.00057395414,0.00032767522,0.00007748663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017770431,0.00014910173,0.00018794497,0.000022396329,0.0016680012,0.00034158316,0.0001742864,0.00020063485,6.246889e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113146765,0.000009816842,0.0000011573853,0.000042456228,0.00012495604,7.664701e-7,0.12408708,0.000080707876,0.000024831963,0.8745935,0.0006479334,0.00027363858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019904824,0.00010128189,0.0000016438347,0.00011466376,0.00019422731,1.0331306e-7,0.0047086137,0.00009436619,0.000653832,0.025554894,0.96823174,0.00014561373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018107654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000966523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9675838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012953514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017566986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.614582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952361554","doi":"10.18778/1733-8077.15.1.03","title":"The Trials and Tribulations of Zimbabwean Precarious Women Workers in Johannesburg: A Cry for Help?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Sociology Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Scholarship; Human rights; Gender studies; Sociology; Migrant workers; Face (sociological concept); Documentation; Political science; Work (physics); Criminology; Economic growth; Law; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.12462550554707856,"score_gpt":0.5079537008259466,"score_spread":0.383328195278868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952361554","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24847208,0.7141529,0.00017927821,0.01788514,0.00071789476,0.007723328,0.00011102422,0.000050154755,0.010708244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9696526,0.025921607,0.00047241314,0.0004926942,0.000093765484,0.0008050487,0.000009625915,0.000013165639,0.0025390936],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99041116,0.008052325,0.00078248023,0.00023162602,0.00015364369,0.00036877653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815729,0.017499031,0.0004981197,0.00018300892,0.00018287615,0.00006401082],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023075487,0.00011429441,0.0009143655,0.000037930513,0.00025899845,0.000013202665,0.0002366353,0.0001472144,0.00006768863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014777553,0.000077970064,0.00015194557,0.0002621001,0.001311905,0.00008642712,0.000039936738,0.00015788329,0.000018585222],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050288778,0.000020779613,0.001994237,0.00038409812,0.00008634424,1.0536494e-7,0.9257421,9.232766e-7,0.0000075489875,0.06496168,0.0017787096,0.004973185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006948259,0.00022700746,0.00051240093,0.0007075907,0.00006592661,1.0483236e-7,0.28961498,0.0000024908566,0.0000021075216,0.084014095,0.6239804,0.00017805945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018839008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010248916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7211805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001366115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023562404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9935214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952494044","doi":"","title":"Expanding the Constitutional Right to State-Funded Legal Counsel to Address the British Columbia Housing Crisis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eviction; Law; Charter; Political science; Constitutional right; State (computer science); Right to counsel; Supreme court; Public administration; Economic Justice; Fair Housing Act; Civil rights","score_opus":0.022337275482845313,"score_gpt":0.3297768709251076,"score_spread":0.3074395954422623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952494044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035096318,0.15705696,0.00019130573,0.009090162,0.0030992294,0.0053949715,0.00034785303,0.00015221971,0.789571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98246914,0.010448652,0.00004769724,0.0060523273,0.00020430401,0.00007017511,0.000011014127,0.000011953895,0.00068471034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978501,0.00019532566,0.0004555605,0.00030379902,0.00076657324,0.00042862276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989422,0.00011907922,0.00017431662,0.0003424267,0.00022238905,0.0001996156],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015981303,0.00013362523,0.00038874682,0.000010654332,0.0016785249,0.0008441727,0.00053880294,0.00004536567,0.0002522062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059213588,0.00009858625,0.000119523735,0.00035840782,0.0010426139,0.00032160827,0.00015844713,0.00022248461,0.00006648593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000099539975,0.000050959414,0.00024010228,0.0008890361,0.000034758443,0.0000032797557,0.0053235153,0.0000016197497,0.0000048242355,0.9717009,0.016101914,0.0056391195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014335243,0.000033886405,0.00003816202,0.0035415827,0.000040380204,0.000003760749,0.0005831626,5.706308e-7,0.000012829172,0.0009541913,0.9944834,0.00016468448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09259898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1295216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9783815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017435265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014740613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964424237","doi":"10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.39","title":"Citizens’ E-Participation at Local Municipal Government in South Africa","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Reviews on Global Economics","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Local government; Government (linguistics); Economic growth; Business; Public administration; Political science; Development economics; Economics","score_opus":0.03646462897086611,"score_gpt":0.31786417983780246,"score_spread":0.28139955086693635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964424237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8735225,0.0063759936,0.000034292356,0.0004580941,0.0009980765,0.0003835733,0.00002165997,0.000006821952,0.11819897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996308,0.0020318804,0.00038158573,0.000343911,0.00020880435,0.000004212771,5.001388e-7,0.000007687389,0.00071337365],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979743,0.00029848723,0.0008989679,0.00016887725,0.00031363417,0.00034576876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856436,0.000091793445,0.0008611995,0.00023271462,0.00004575407,0.00020415396],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018702011,0.00013799254,0.00053495326,0.000031795727,0.00007335386,0.000054585937,0.00041326578,0.00010684389,0.0003532461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033144318,0.00012163714,0.0002212026,0.00017534388,0.00011060489,0.00022209507,0.00008017034,0.00019614105,0.0008661184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001827833,0.0010363157,0.28233087,0.0002374836,0.0002479307,0.00010295139,0.4167887,0.026012674,0.000022606242,0.15275864,0.012697359,0.10593664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059854105,0.00019524102,0.0020722658,0.0001353399,0.000025311077,0.0000016431885,0.0020118582,0.00033207613,0.0000071626264,0.000626876,0.9938391,0.00015457664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041251198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004151959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98114175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033096517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011360535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964660712","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-05-27","title":"Institutions protecting constitutional democracy: Some conceptual and methodological preliminaries","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Democracy; Legislature; Statutory law; Political science; Separation of powers; Law; Government (linguistics); Executive branch; Constitutional law; Relation (database); Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07140572652467007,"score_gpt":0.3218985388752062,"score_spread":0.2504928123505361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964660712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2602231,0.004086222,0.011657787,0.0030644087,0.0012489253,0.00064567785,0.00003153743,0.00010466695,0.7189377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823366,0.00012603874,0.0165575,0.00004569969,0.0001373013,7.051687e-8,6.300638e-7,0.0000016570525,0.00079452636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988052,0.00046362545,0.00011552326,0.00013054015,0.0002869019,0.00019819319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991506,0.0003247687,0.00014612003,0.00007090148,0.00015756201,0.00015010108],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009415489,0.00006977989,0.00017341363,0.000015076331,0.0021798597,0.000044432407,0.00023328343,0.00011043921,0.0013970606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039242563,0.000071328555,0.00006403882,0.000029895824,0.0044872784,0.0011070371,0.000106832624,0.00026147012,0.000014755105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054902433,0.000022471713,0.0017103478,0.0000042777174,0.000027732216,0.00001487239,0.042494263,0.00003650202,0.00008231495,0.9550663,0.00009247634,0.000393527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009976812,0.00022103035,0.0014588871,0.00006733787,0.00006536055,0.000044637905,0.121868774,0.000027790757,0.00005071555,0.011096342,0.86388403,0.00021740481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013394641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006162925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94396996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027577122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031744372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965274425","doi":"10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.50","title":"Local Government Reform in South Africa: The Quest for Review and Repositioning of Municipal Administration","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Reviews on Global Economics","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public administration; Government (linguistics); Local government; Democracy; Politics; Audit; State (computer science); Corporate governance; Development plan; Accountability; Relevance (law); Political science; Business; Finance; Accounting; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.029361215144516988,"score_gpt":0.321520357490562,"score_spread":0.292159142346045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965274425","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28620437,0.509393,0.00034761406,0.010834808,0.0013077892,0.0044504735,0.00015649782,0.00001105883,0.18729444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96323353,0.035403956,0.0007417255,0.00041952278,0.00007866704,0.0000082765,6.0157737e-7,0.0000038944177,0.0001098453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986548,0.00014783382,0.00082453864,0.00010246498,0.00013651141,0.00013389745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985217,0.00008207627,0.001112404,0.00016229268,0.000059050326,0.00006251829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002873372,0.000081211496,0.0004489684,0.000011038879,0.000060971885,0.000033223074,0.0002356906,0.00005075441,0.000014177759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030374032,0.000054888686,0.00013274657,0.00009097146,0.000101139405,0.00017806004,0.000027609001,0.000115694806,0.0000062182953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011357022,0.00062209874,0.017482208,0.0048952256,0.0003044928,0.00001602667,0.11749704,0.0005595846,0.000008730397,0.75410986,0.0032988612,0.10007017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003909849,0.0005273691,0.00041086052,0.0018234479,0.00011290973,0.000008549749,0.0040706224,0.00007086975,0.000008699114,0.0009411809,0.99151987,0.00011464392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000420014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025264866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.988221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095016946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012511668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24846601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966063952","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190653330.013.33","title":"Foreign Relations Law in the Constitutions and Courts of Commonwealth African Countries","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.028321213844853897,"score_gpt":0.247206760510738,"score_spread":0.2188855466658841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966063952","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000088134206,0.00020957747,0.00004810123,0.00016973498,0.00008189695,0.0006319242,0.00030497933,0.00003061271,0.998435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44149056,0.00018673671,0.00009975875,0.00006796772,0.00003379227,7.111947e-7,0.000010675923,0.000008775104,0.55810106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998925,0.00012680722,0.0001725472,0.00020442455,0.00036156838,0.0002096593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988055,0.00045146391,0.0002304269,0.00032372467,0.000119277516,0.00006956667],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036466855,0.0001487434,0.00027671905,0.00009923887,0.0006102715,0.000044917004,0.00048346343,0.0002689617,0.00003514668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021238677,0.00014214551,0.00006895981,0.000016546799,0.0028175153,0.00012686614,0.0001435035,0.00036718615,0.0000014021109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019565077,0.0000061337246,0.00011718526,0.000020854506,0.000024154135,0.000013422079,0.027384596,0.0000051933084,5.7141353e-8,0.9718075,0.0005570605,0.000044271404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022400387,0.000027345943,0.000017574803,0.00008256712,0.000088659646,8.0850816e-7,0.0036827417,0.0000045375205,5.5812063e-7,0.013696475,0.9820344,0.0001403497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037514574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004744011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9814773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016537396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042138158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966748507","doi":"10.29173/cais980","title":"Metaphors, for dealing with data in the workplace","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Information science; Library science; Humanities; Psychology; Ethnology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.056665501450579546,"score_gpt":0.32386461452620663,"score_spread":0.2671991130756271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966748507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.920347,0.00042359848,0.00009362373,0.007958952,0.00020154718,0.0011148979,0.00025910488,0.000046525372,0.069554806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961972,0.000051585557,0.0026948338,0.00023418463,0.00027269445,0.00003676857,0.0000039378747,0.000017874638,0.00049087853],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806744,0.000055008844,0.0003682058,0.00035589817,0.0006734061,0.00048002147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9764364,0.00053985877,0.00057654816,0.0004365125,0.021920303,0.00009037785],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028497549,0.00018639595,0.0003437505,0.000078015044,0.00036059672,0.0018101278,0.004629116,0.00013005376,0.000025846071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026650317,0.0001134397,0.00007279871,0.00057036284,0.0014562918,0.00586109,0.00055182533,0.00024025801,0.0000023515506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039796787,0.00011882172,0.11539107,0.00013884473,0.00009600249,9.135722e-7,0.7509522,0.000001312158,0.0006337351,0.1245645,0.0043833978,0.003321237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007204732,0.00040768637,0.010922421,0.00039310707,0.00017750623,0.0000048041156,0.056647718,0.00023996679,0.0034033754,0.0092887515,0.9174249,0.00036928922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002016595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011010707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91304153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043174758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003270855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969393105","doi":"10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.38","title":"The Influence of Legislation and Regulation on Strategy in Public Entities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Reviews on Global Economics","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Business; Law and economics; Public economics; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.031077486922164794,"score_gpt":0.3115971274325305,"score_spread":0.2805196405103657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969393105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9537835,0.0038822412,0.0000016845279,0.0006978746,0.00019153675,0.00018391944,0.0000024082917,0.0000015552265,0.04125525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869671,0.012650241,0.0000511755,0.00007697018,0.0000692007,7.963625e-7,2.0434457e-7,0.0000019467857,0.000182367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990156,0.00018184091,0.0005156107,0.00006851107,0.000110465866,0.00010792839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989046,0.00012494369,0.0007360029,0.00010973614,0.00008164523,0.000043089334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017092124,0.000056928882,0.00021414335,0.000039966933,0.000060214446,0.00009903139,0.00019088904,0.00004792096,0.000015165292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035100876,0.000040470273,0.000055503326,0.00011249661,0.00010953224,0.00047929995,0.000014149158,0.00009662802,0.000019608296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008363226,0.0000460576,0.08126042,0.000035202927,0.000019615625,6.4302986e-7,0.003755806,0.009588673,0.0000079294805,0.8464906,0.00047031732,0.058241095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002743246,0.00021552174,0.07552535,0.00018888841,0.000007463173,0.0000012554791,0.0006201858,0.00009026071,0.000004160073,0.015238079,0.9077558,0.00007868998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007911221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041487147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9072855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021098497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013954566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16503298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974595825","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a4221","title":"Director's Duty to Act for a Proper Purpose in the Context of Distribution under the Companies Act 71 of 2008","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Goddard Space Flight Center; Nedbank","keywords":"Duty; Statute; Statutory law; Statutory interpretation; Companies Act; Law; Context (archaeology); Common law; Interpretation (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Face (sociological concept); Statute of limitations; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Corporate law; Economics; Sociology; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.015442356436548343,"score_gpt":0.2963009868218156,"score_spread":0.28085863038526726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974595825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9592535,0.010212268,0.0013947204,0.015318476,0.0008806846,0.00572725,0.00019487082,0.000117507065,0.006900738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971567,0.0005111523,0.00019108813,0.00040133714,0.0005893933,0.00025940206,0.00003685176,0.00008688017,0.00076719775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918596,0.0016652594,0.0015368651,0.0006902875,0.0018457932,0.002402178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99472314,0.0017035308,0.0011752931,0.0011952001,0.0008847597,0.00031805932],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006126984,0.00063627254,0.001229341,0.0001938796,0.0010380617,0.00031194216,0.002706948,0.00035956863,0.00015985384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008378049,0.00040392025,0.0007273144,0.0014871499,0.0011734932,0.00077018683,0.0002064829,0.0017896342,0.00004575554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004579116,0.0021775456,0.014813558,0.00035444455,0.0018260862,0.00002182308,0.18300503,0.0029303285,0.008727363,0.757854,0.008711777,0.014998951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004798394,0.002933145,0.002876647,0.00038770906,0.00045629623,0.00007549697,0.08854001,0.00022734843,0.008797582,0.010659343,0.87910426,0.0011437604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048573534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020178305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8703925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018497986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016445953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980138343","doi":"10.3390/land8100150","title":"Participatory Rural Appraisal Approaches for Public Participation in EIA: Lessons from South Africa","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; North-West University","keywords":"Public participation; Participatory rural appraisal; Citizen journalism; Environmental planning; Participatory development; Rural development; Participatory planning; Community participation; Geography; Environmental resource management; Political science; Business; Environmental protection; Socioeconomics; Public administration; Sociology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.18033780112979325,"score_gpt":0.38185208951391764,"score_spread":0.20151428838412438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980138343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97958964,0.0003427462,0.00037724,0.0022457526,0.0005697697,0.0005260084,0.00006182494,0.00009256054,0.016194431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982867,0.0000017749607,0.00030097796,0.000033489505,0.00029056522,0.00020432605,0.0000293784,0.000015271271,0.00083749613],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852073,0.0002043036,0.00020898883,0.00024678698,0.0002834256,0.0005357848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990577,0.00045841633,0.00008570344,0.00021868224,0.0000370273,0.00014248375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061140634,0.00010602261,0.00020163073,0.000057404653,0.00015014865,0.00013110333,0.0002397818,0.00014036335,0.00017212995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005566481,0.00009684449,0.00005759004,0.00024286166,0.00013599766,0.00028700763,0.000047140962,0.00012482502,0.00018242782],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003189119,0.00008752402,0.73727626,0.000008655866,0.000016338425,8.132653e-7,0.24828583,0.000049414346,0.00001465434,0.012959702,0.0001741959,0.0010947048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044204495,0.00020245885,0.29086658,0.00007277719,0.000121249344,1.1150909e-7,0.07027759,0.008882577,0.000100274534,0.01389228,0.6100582,0.0011054716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012516112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003838404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60988396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006565174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000112700494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39492038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980704029","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v39i2.11355","title":"UNTANGLING THE REQUIREMENT OF GOOD FAITH IN THE DERIVATIVE ACTION IN COMPANY LAW (Part 1)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Foundation","keywords":"Faith; Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Statutory law; Fair dealing; Action (physics); Jurisprudence; Meaning (existential); Political science; Sociology; Good faith; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.08262122442472057,"score_gpt":0.3696140038897634,"score_spread":0.2869927794650428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980704029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70371383,0.00008443406,0.00003316252,0.0027686516,0.0003247569,0.0003220462,0.0000027563758,0.000013412515,0.29273695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99873865,0.0000039341353,0.000109227694,0.0006374288,0.00026594437,0.000015275373,7.094806e-7,0.0000037739806,0.00022504514],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989666,0.00031898922,0.00016065348,0.00010299139,0.00027498804,0.00017580007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954885,0.00015617977,0.00007066303,0.0001631707,0.000047164107,0.00001396775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000982896,0.000051991687,0.000079992584,0.000025119945,0.00016063626,0.000039372284,0.00028055138,0.000038756694,0.00012451127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000659084,0.000030155297,0.000021745836,0.000347792,0.0004976849,0.00015874433,0.000037720056,0.000113262395,0.000034022924],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024446506,0.00007713582,0.018051747,0.000005421273,0.000008629082,0.0000026128932,0.86589223,0.000005720109,0.0003080652,0.11413748,0.0007288849,0.00075760845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042642126,0.00010749264,0.013918595,0.00010128183,0.000011567235,3.282531e-7,0.09487925,0.000058590864,0.002759151,0.0051325387,0.88245714,0.00014762788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031694383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017280122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8817283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008996127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002654574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96427137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980919765","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a5950","title":"Deciphering Dangerousness: A Critical Analysis of Section 286A and B of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Declaration; Discretion; Law; Statutory law; Political science; Legislature; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.00906949135286845,"score_gpt":0.29022582411866865,"score_spread":0.2811563327658002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980919765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.983764,0.0068252254,0.00049068226,0.00087320304,0.0005505738,0.0006532131,0.000032610234,0.00005940095,0.006751072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997818,0.00062187307,0.00059219927,0.000042893073,0.00039918997,0.000023486631,0.0000044519193,0.00007000286,0.00042791062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.993423,0.0008995115,0.0015266798,0.0006736128,0.0018594582,0.0016177634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99540263,0.00085784006,0.0014905952,0.00093544956,0.0009530452,0.00036044428],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026515687,0.0005213202,0.0015135029,0.0004537185,0.0006951287,0.00013486108,0.001317996,0.0004655063,0.00029143266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012686584,0.00042093144,0.0009159397,0.0026804162,0.0018120296,0.0008183386,0.00029549553,0.0016718449,0.000003804551],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002912657,0.0022359276,0.24378756,0.0022837797,0.015360955,0.00003530565,0.215504,0.0061647515,0.086642176,0.41425,0.00035906013,0.010463838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021492774,0.014595007,0.10155351,0.0056416593,0.0664668,0.00095173955,0.31661278,0.009699124,0.19646639,0.054662883,0.20260711,0.009250209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032058097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0090102125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3595871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008933714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014194261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981107737","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v39i3.11326","title":"UNTANGLING THE REQUIREMENT OF GOOD FAITH IN THE DERIVATIVE ACTION IN COMPANY LAW (Part 2)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Law; Appeal; Supreme court; Fair dealing; Statutory law; Action (physics); Jurisprudence; Meaning (existential); Political science; Sociology; Good faith; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.08242535669262861,"score_gpt":0.369411996836841,"score_spread":0.2869866401442124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981107737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68951994,0.00008299126,0.00003292472,0.0026962657,0.00032578618,0.00032228744,0.000002765731,0.0000134160355,0.30700365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99873734,0.0000038274934,0.000108624336,0.0006383289,0.00026652607,0.000015278503,7.0502375e-7,0.0000037740645,0.00022557621],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896747,0.00031919632,0.00015961086,0.00010270188,0.00027513548,0.0001758862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995491,0.00015646598,0.00007022377,0.00016317608,0.000047074333,0.000013972846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009743808,0.00005200534,0.000080052276,0.000025150195,0.00016071396,0.00003928926,0.000280704,0.000038764338,0.00012706737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006588226,0.00003016151,0.000021750418,0.00034839867,0.0004978638,0.00015885798,0.00003772538,0.000113290684,0.000034048753],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002459438,0.00007822189,0.018169714,0.0000055044065,0.000008762704,0.0000026500998,0.86436534,0.000005724278,0.00029499232,0.11554006,0.00075227756,0.0007521498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041808136,0.000104039835,0.013909712,0.00009732568,0.000011337304,3.099145e-7,0.08975324,0.000057858528,0.0026659432,0.004954086,0.8878835,0.00014457524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00321775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018109044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8871312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009001091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026317844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981705201","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190083472.003.0003","title":"Ethical and Legal Issues in Mandatory Reporting","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Political science; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.04175626881034083,"score_gpt":0.36278310002432557,"score_spread":0.32102683121398473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981705201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030253347,0.0015992733,0.0000033616877,0.0038932702,0.0004805363,0.00025406922,0.0000033987105,0.00009615626,0.9933674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.060149297,0.00024614437,0.00050131103,0.0007814827,0.00051619957,0.0000022942668,0.0000037581196,0.00003061298,0.9377689],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997822,0.000069898706,0.0007415058,0.00045231913,0.00060967985,0.0003046038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986005,0.00020149421,0.00074438145,0.0002813473,0.00007633561,0.00009596653],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022378296,0.0001956653,0.00045582632,0.00011272688,0.00013527472,0.00014212762,0.00022522427,0.0012345923,0.0020305454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001446635,0.00018465727,0.00007568537,0.00003153684,0.0005016995,0.00013537498,0.00017527689,0.0014049689,0.0003777568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046055875,0.0000029472883,0.00066975027,0.000023615294,0.000009734644,0.00016541517,0.010785151,1.5307108e-7,9.815471e-7,0.982574,0.0048442683,0.0009194032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007809342,0.00001542131,0.000060819362,0.00010675215,0.0000108109925,0.000002281775,0.00052337436,0.0000021283033,0.0000020138343,0.012324039,0.9866322,0.0002420423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028856536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044686655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.981788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012535429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033511597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99888176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990248207","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v12n4p8","title":"Do the Queensland Regulations Governing the Refund of Motor Vehicle Registration Fees Breach s 92 of the Commonwealth Constitution?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Constitution; Protectionism; Law; Denial; Extraterritoriality; State (computer science); Business; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; International trade; Jurisdiction","score_opus":0.020090675629249082,"score_gpt":0.3072781416663553,"score_spread":0.2871874660371062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990248207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.902676,0.0006682112,0.000026817112,0.009154024,0.0002904572,0.00016453376,0.00003446788,0.0000024024796,0.08698309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987566,0.000029939027,0.0000607102,0.00013913958,0.00016634479,3.3483272e-7,2.4897145e-7,0.000002284986,0.00084441307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989699,0.00021766774,0.00029185513,0.000041997635,0.00036922327,0.00010931993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872005,0.00035992055,0.00051227154,0.00016942338,0.00019721042,0.000041131803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009701441,0.000042578296,0.00011456341,0.00001148759,0.00043015613,0.000054770862,0.00022844574,0.000041847885,0.000015641735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001772877,0.000020569667,0.000059970767,0.00008747816,0.0009356303,0.000106232954,0.000030023199,0.00016188585,7.438024e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006336578,0.0000146110615,0.020984078,0.000009564073,0.000015965004,1.9535346e-7,0.013613956,0.000039777882,0.0001363583,0.96488845,0.0002619592,0.000028736462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008917963,0.00025849268,0.15393649,0.0002849096,0.0001750512,0.00002391697,0.025956202,0.0002691982,0.00045719455,0.061840486,0.7557558,0.00015046442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004157841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074042135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.903048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044804045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021177418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62854403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990939872","doi":"","title":"Kontrakbreuk en nie-vermoënskade : geld die gesegde \"belofte maak skuld\" nie vir gekwetste gevoelens en psigiese besering nie?","year":2011,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Journal of South African Law / Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Law; Feeling; Injustice; Scrutiny; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.029813549807218818,"score_gpt":0.27268135950774386,"score_spread":0.24286780970052504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990939872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6748841,0.036341663,0.0011603998,0.0059883245,0.013119854,0.003357282,0.00161158,0.0010376556,0.26249918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97017777,0.002556315,0.0052003413,0.0005659577,0.0066106706,0.000070587506,0.000023277791,0.0006173154,0.014177763],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97768325,0.0036727139,0.0054362924,0.0024123057,0.005418371,0.0053770733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98542655,0.0018709705,0.0047863345,0.0027438686,0.0017822785,0.0033900097],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075955745,0.002720957,0.0042223483,0.0013611185,0.0025783568,0.0012968166,0.0065509053,0.0023449273,0.0012248281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024056036,0.0025468604,0.0027961084,0.002292354,0.004273914,0.0035249304,0.0017185695,0.0054989187,0.0014316153],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032874849,0.0022261492,0.010937797,0.00075675466,0.0033079677,0.0057634646,0.94813055,0.0002783567,0.0035118305,0.009375464,0.0057066977,0.006717494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0067821443,0.003316816,0.008753132,0.0021794834,0.003412715,0.0003773837,0.110696375,0.0002058407,0.004261315,0.0060364525,0.84847206,0.005506302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010183748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004822194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84276533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027565158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019758018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991900837","doi":"10.3138/utlj.69.s1.006","title":"The right-remedy gap in economic and social rights adjudication: Holism versus separability","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Dignity; Holism; Social rights; Fundamental rights; Right to health; Political science; Law and economics; Empowerment; Human rights; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.014228895770455503,"score_gpt":0.26792245688190774,"score_spread":0.25369356111145225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991900837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49127096,0.0006536371,0.000004093624,0.0015574533,0.0008172808,0.00014582857,0.0000060309703,0.0000121175635,0.5055326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986299,0.00011405679,0.00011325956,0.000009922103,0.0001797542,5.0694183e-8,4.9149656e-7,0.0000022340632,0.0009502927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990749,0.0002625572,0.00012513115,0.00012799192,0.00020705599,0.00020237632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993893,0.00019221423,0.00015730238,0.000114369504,0.00006361382,0.0000832267],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007748274,0.000062334286,0.00013851219,0.000011237119,0.0014356584,0.00005455508,0.00039509402,0.000094211115,0.0012182897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001466568,0.000056134922,0.00006377795,0.000020083744,0.00067661534,0.0005682259,0.000066227956,0.00016808024,0.000037733862],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004870894,0.000053145475,0.005009009,0.000006166003,0.000066883935,0.000011530787,0.1681611,0.000011062865,0.000008119003,0.82323843,0.0016677462,0.0012796925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001353717,0.000049536924,0.008011884,0.0000072839835,0.000020697495,9.885978e-7,0.014144256,0.00002542228,0.0000049959835,0.0055734017,0.97070086,0.00010697779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09333616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96903306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086784473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000115535426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992588057","doi":"","title":"Scope of the Promotion of Access to Information Act 2 of 2000 : a comparative perspective","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of information; Scope (computer science); Legislation; Constitution; Promotion (chess); Government (linguistics); Law; Information access; Public access; Perspective (graphical); Access to information; Political science; Directive; Public administration; Public relations; Business; Computer science; Politics; Library science","score_opus":0.04887231065456085,"score_gpt":0.3752751095676394,"score_spread":0.32640279891307855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992588057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35952488,0.000027161932,0.00026357773,0.00058424805,0.00006164929,0.0005136584,0.000011315742,0.000010127136,0.6390034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989134,0.0000012559071,0.00035455936,0.000016235454,0.000023605233,0.0000063371967,7.270512e-7,0.0000012069571,0.0006826902],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919146,0.00009707697,0.00022167104,0.000052140316,0.0003509548,0.000086694396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991113,0.000044060464,0.00021042718,0.0001118825,0.0005029149,0.000019409592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023484114,0.000042982163,0.00012597792,0.000054217042,0.000065688815,0.00002036609,0.00031191244,0.00003362878,0.00020579541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012881166,0.000028924778,0.00004031609,0.0006078311,0.00022834478,0.0006754889,0.00006358987,0.000038967875,0.000010032108],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004920884,0.0001809171,0.01242979,0.000026338806,0.000019514899,3.420447e-8,0.8248834,0.0005960712,0.00072018075,0.1578034,0.0027867632,0.00050437194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010862276,0.0005682419,0.3658898,0.0002629013,0.00007618787,2.171966e-7,0.17958507,0.00020302842,0.39280316,0.0163671,0.042742424,0.0004156568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021958603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027879751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6452983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000113628106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019347284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98455423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993749956","doi":"","title":"South Africa's Wedding Jitters: Consolidation, Abolition, or Proliferation?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consolidation (business); Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.028741838777739132,"score_gpt":0.308755391149123,"score_spread":0.28001355237138387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993749956","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01895412,0.00014658475,0.00791885,0.00436842,0.00053649826,0.0006415847,0.000021730437,0.0006653075,0.9667469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9345089,0.0000022616475,0.0049020583,0.00027915824,0.00086222624,0.000049776474,0.000015558464,0.000013314418,0.05936671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983906,0.00015873539,0.00029650232,0.00026360629,0.00047706882,0.00041347893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992104,0.00012721827,0.00009950359,0.00019149718,0.0002611173,0.00011022049],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046808133,0.00011724433,0.00013645648,0.000090728005,0.0007640259,0.00033806972,0.00022734425,0.00010165486,0.002769941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003665009,0.000097145174,0.000045851226,0.000505201,0.00027359146,0.0004890684,0.000032002004,0.00009218829,0.00063519296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031392217,0.00010743704,0.016706215,0.000011285696,0.00001707868,0.000010266556,0.20807086,0.000075795964,0.000075920216,0.7069342,0.06777975,0.000179804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036564327,0.000023277875,0.00089143484,0.000012631328,0.000019489604,7.654155e-7,0.014244793,0.00009246866,0.00034239833,0.01091178,0.9728174,0.00027791347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060835603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005510815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9155548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011777218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023487613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99814165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994834569","doi":"10.1093/acrefore/9780190277734.013.763","title":"The Legal and Political Framework for Archaeology and the Protection of Archaeological Resources in South Africa","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of African History","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Politics; Government (linguistics); Charter; Political science; Colonialism; Archaeology; Public administration; Geography; History; Economic growth; Law; Ethnology","score_opus":0.05437510252046681,"score_gpt":0.33218686045543344,"score_spread":0.27781175793496665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994834569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006735152,0.06174737,0.00020616587,0.005391291,0.0011043377,0.0043372763,0.00013219927,0.000036905363,0.9203093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7970953,0.10246433,0.0019378263,0.0000357086,0.0014410301,0.0013184623,0.00000931783,0.00007731733,0.09562074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921184,0.0034040804,0.0007801028,0.00070253154,0.0015516779,0.001443203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855964,0.012529118,0.0004532772,0.0006465408,0.00047818918,0.00029645054],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00703087,0.00031133505,0.0009502358,0.0005331137,0.0005573711,0.00003276927,0.0012864576,0.0008844158,0.0000413146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015326759,0.00019076071,0.00019052479,0.0005349096,0.02723553,0.00009226691,0.0009291313,0.0026855473,0.0000020513348],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001325998,0.00006328666,0.00090649014,0.00040914788,0.0000562132,0.0000060920906,0.32039922,4.236948e-7,1.7880386e-7,0.66256183,0.0024745332,0.011796583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056932814,0.00044643728,0.0002777224,0.00019394925,0.000033009124,0.0000011914411,0.023809267,0.000013830806,2.9789845e-7,0.059473384,0.91499925,0.00018232947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037430902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012884178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9125247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081566494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018429843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997082908","doi":"10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.101","title":"Inevitability of Labour Broking in South Africa and the Need for Strict Regulation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Reviews on Global Economics","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Economics; Economic system; Labour economics; Development economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.027318801377680516,"score_gpt":0.30387043564056754,"score_spread":0.27655163426288704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997082908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9720928,0.014823277,0.0000870696,0.0013309123,0.00047659437,0.0010650171,0.00003188178,0.0000032750515,0.010089177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99691314,0.0017186854,0.0010395057,0.000100727826,0.00012979044,0.0000031056895,2.3114394e-7,0.0000034832078,0.00009131641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855566,0.00035139528,0.00074755563,0.00010179088,0.00009914473,0.00014447425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982468,0.00040817505,0.0010305335,0.00015260951,0.00010808186,0.00005382735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052102124,0.0000788555,0.00050592754,0.000041341646,0.000050742667,0.000043366334,0.00025068695,0.00006451471,0.000023602102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015808265,0.00005304033,0.00016277515,0.00019139994,0.0001325836,0.00020603811,0.00002935738,0.00010851916,0.0000049349755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002179394,0.00017495232,0.21032885,0.0005090275,0.000099839046,7.365597e-7,0.12479525,0.0019131697,0.0000105648705,0.5983284,0.00072713994,0.06093266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023659174,0.0001664322,0.011609863,0.00020293394,0.00003967632,9.2875246e-7,0.0028911505,0.0002796931,0.000005422901,0.023386741,0.9589253,0.0001259508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054047592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006595098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95819813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026561995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000115829185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21629219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998427861","doi":"10.36030/2664-3618-2018-1-85-108","title":"ЮРИДИЧНЕ РЕГУЛЮВАННЯ ВІДНОСИН У СФЕРІ УПРАВЛІННЯ ПРОЕКТАМИ ПУБЛІЧНО-ПРИВАТНОГО ПАРТНЕРСТВА У СВІТІ","year":2018,"lang":"uk","type":"article","venue":"Збірник наукових праць Національної академії державного управління при Президентові України","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine","score_opus":0.028518571387873174,"score_gpt":0.3711329744263023,"score_spread":0.3426144030384291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998427861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12079035,0.031295333,0.002305842,0.02511104,0.048354704,0.01275991,0.0031131427,0.008007959,0.74826175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8415079,0.004075571,0.006290602,0.008318706,0.03282987,0.0010951834,0.0006062681,0.0021926987,0.10308316],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9459256,0.00645512,0.009483143,0.011380393,0.011023236,0.015732532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9647049,0.0040334207,0.005863896,0.011985066,0.005077534,0.008335198],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011148555,0.008476731,0.008495466,0.003766844,0.011306202,0.005706796,0.01640374,0.0075607933,0.036524553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075676264,0.0091286125,0.005072552,0.014226114,0.019460352,0.0070158164,0.006447626,0.008769719,0.06925453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036001028,0.008192217,0.03765418,0.0019337732,0.004981658,0.002436197,0.2216752,0.00016723838,0.004813098,0.14177206,0.50004184,0.07273244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008585474,0.0036983227,0.0063388254,0.001993404,0.0026240635,0.00025394242,0.020400783,0.000802596,0.0040466087,0.023885133,0.91586024,0.011510631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016040191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0120172715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7207176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054392274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008152223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003267222","doi":"","title":"Retail Worker Politics, Race and Consumption in South Africa: Shelved in the Service Economy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour / Le Travail","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Consumption (sociology); Politics; Service (business); Business; Economy; Economics; Political science; Sociology; Law; Social science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.024840740740690016,"score_gpt":0.2613500682622468,"score_spread":0.23650932752155682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003267222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9341305,0.0014387021,0.0000035829382,0.0027796493,0.00012637772,0.00039649956,0.00000988193,0.00003787535,0.061076924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98694485,0.00003556433,0.00011123379,0.00074084604,0.00010257832,0.00002159463,0.0000022833663,0.00001287711,0.01202816],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983493,0.00043877814,0.00024310975,0.00029340145,0.00020528387,0.00047012873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926645,0.0002381445,0.00007902298,0.00028366552,0.000049446604,0.00008326689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011508311,0.00012588892,0.00021099056,0.000077285345,0.0001447997,0.0001702183,0.00038221708,0.00014847745,0.00035909616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009381567,0.00010857873,0.000027093249,0.00041444044,0.00020853875,0.00028366226,0.00004944716,0.0003124043,0.0005297965],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016900209,0.000045603203,0.27501193,0.000031546948,0.0000069875914,0.000006611345,0.67096555,0.000011580423,0.000013435325,0.053462096,0.00010771591,0.00032007226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015749742,0.000027125194,0.2651481,0.00006912567,0.00001288308,8.848037e-7,0.12547326,0.0001069378,0.000018784916,0.004961976,0.6022429,0.00036307788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040297746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007505857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6021352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009085309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012983863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6809639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004162162","doi":"10.26643/gis.v15i1.18704","title":"Predictors Of Efficiency In Municipal Solid Waste Management In Moses Kotane Municipality In The North-West Province Of South Africa","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GIS Business","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Municipal solid waste; Solid waste management; Business; Socioeconomic status; Environmental planning; Waste management; Environmental science; Environmental health; Population; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.03575204172753264,"score_gpt":0.2866763591676303,"score_spread":0.25092431744009763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004162162","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9832584,0.00033464047,0.000017565844,0.0005731032,0.00012289679,0.0007613663,0.00003196892,0.000023131,0.014876926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996127,0.000039046176,0.00010886766,0.000053435888,0.000064183805,0.000037933507,0.0000043290033,0.000011690533,0.00006785052],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730533,0.00045804036,0.0006801593,0.00033313554,0.0007510141,0.00047230406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896395,0.0001679383,0.0002549149,0.00044046505,0.00010882504,0.00006387597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010833223,0.00016487682,0.0004013052,0.00017017109,0.000072566094,0.000027901091,0.0012922753,0.000090610825,0.000025387588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064778375,0.00013337989,0.000050226936,0.0035929012,0.00061544764,0.00018997498,0.000319353,0.00023636526,0.0000058393794],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009462193,0.00043594578,0.20982976,0.00023732126,0.000012822885,0.00008056061,0.7799697,0.007517671,0.000018654031,0.0015035868,0.000021408874,0.00027792933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023556994,0.00018599792,0.7201739,0.00043976618,0.000081091755,4.043854e-7,0.2622964,0.003037652,0.00010413799,0.00023507587,0.010444486,0.00064539665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010331339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022689406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5176733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009496378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015561614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005193046","doi":"10.1002/iir.1361","title":"Rectifying an unconstitutional dispensation? A consideration of proposed reforms relating to no income no asset debtors in South Africa","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debt; Asset (computer security); Economics; Intervention (counseling); Business; Finance","score_opus":0.08024285634923674,"score_gpt":0.37181749629770094,"score_spread":0.2915746399484642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005193046","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079650514,0.011742251,0.0018481635,0.025790818,0.004066387,0.0052295183,0.00026090167,0.00041529382,0.8709962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918736,0.0003967529,0.0059446897,0.0010304797,0.00036808808,0.00005260389,0.000042799165,0.000013193366,0.00027777944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744,0.00029148613,0.0008456664,0.00036640812,0.0008268089,0.00022962541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998264,0.00016412284,0.00036945113,0.00017388295,0.0008336269,0.00019493056],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011256408,0.00015467305,0.00033680003,0.00012214584,0.00017972573,0.00007846959,0.0004556057,0.00009060878,0.0006402372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008841723,0.0001395875,0.000096214586,0.0006875537,0.00016144042,0.0008478267,0.00009972617,0.00025709474,0.00040242667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031542312,0.00062446535,0.16602594,0.0024645568,0.00023048173,0.000082600985,0.36562502,0.0011919125,0.0021119872,0.44955283,0.003382156,0.008392602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001193348,0.000532839,0.0055205366,0.009564894,0.00009181205,0.0000045308543,0.002607366,0.003279652,0.00014230906,0.0045007053,0.971482,0.0010800166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003996509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029883755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96809983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038786413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046978774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005219098","doi":"","title":"Practice and procedure: UCPR 229 - defamation proceedings - damages to be assessed","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hogan; Damages; Plaintiff; Law; Political science; Legal action; Action (physics); Engineering; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.012174577972417657,"score_gpt":0.27580014579316947,"score_spread":0.2636255678207518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005219098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8526659,0.000058204718,0.00019763906,0.05610582,0.00003709534,0.00039073953,0.0000046986534,0.00030842182,0.0902315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98354954,0.00008449021,0.01489211,0.00022616581,0.000021294516,4.7869503e-7,0.0000010991287,0.0000047333974,0.0012200796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990366,0.000027257614,0.0001121548,0.00031007573,0.00026198738,0.00025191516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991972,0.00005230122,0.0001535652,0.00016045394,0.00032999952,0.00010651303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038162438,0.000106671054,0.00018413602,0.00029304868,0.00037413376,0.000038844722,0.00043177337,0.00026808085,0.000042656968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011852551,0.00012272017,0.000027400994,0.00073765754,0.00035836978,0.0005081012,0.00013785882,0.00021225768,0.000027492284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041957738,0.0006789157,0.12647456,0.00012252814,0.00013939476,0.00010838388,0.17422445,0.0000061603196,0.0057738926,0.63883936,0.015828688,0.03738409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007339905,0.00027536452,0.06610697,0.000080230435,0.00010086012,0.0000069989246,0.0573457,0.000019998466,0.0017523813,0.008599494,0.8646112,0.0003668241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042732363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014648351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8487825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009012982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009589291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50043833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005361189","doi":"","title":"Practice and procedure: Personal Injuries Proceedings Act 2002 s 27(1) - duty of respondent to give information and documents","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Respondent; Law; Duty; Scope (computer science); Legislature; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Computer science","score_opus":0.005497805870604089,"score_gpt":0.2535990927887431,"score_spread":0.248101286918139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005361189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95898557,0.000090903304,0.00002983417,0.0110504925,0.000027111973,0.00033112318,0.00001112541,0.00007288942,0.029400948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944243,0.00016811166,0.0041587814,0.00007334754,0.000008524562,3.1307337e-7,6.5369875e-7,0.0000020592847,0.0011639083],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992223,0.000020578804,0.00013673895,0.0001723252,0.00026818298,0.0001798975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927723,0.000036174406,0.00021308693,0.0000864956,0.00030322923,0.00008380182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034757247,0.0000901517,0.00017328038,0.0003229735,0.00021541682,0.00002785223,0.00024038521,0.00019130677,0.000046182264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008014898,0.00009796142,0.000020748908,0.00043184214,0.00050501677,0.00093122,0.00016888138,0.00016174078,0.000016027792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021516955,0.00029997973,0.2932225,0.00018966067,0.00017145665,0.000019596842,0.55053055,0.0000012489731,0.0011942234,0.098617084,0.010802552,0.042799477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010212134,0.000490573,0.12881169,0.00012596657,0.000088398556,0.000006570274,0.0960677,0.0000118245025,0.0012947678,0.003089755,0.76870155,0.00028998492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048418203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006169518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.757899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069470276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008860856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39947507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006412958","doi":"","title":"Practice and procedure - Disclosure of documents - production for inspection","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Production (economics); Publishing; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Business; World Wide Web; Law; Accounting; Database; Economics","score_opus":0.008141806058587896,"score_gpt":0.2672262602857488,"score_spread":0.2590844542271609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006412958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9731335,0.00013565403,0.00080195355,0.014966313,0.0001458048,0.00060564966,0.000010165237,0.00018192997,0.010018996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898468,0.00014377595,0.009321154,0.0000054384036,0.00002613584,8.573722e-7,0.0000013412254,0.0000041038784,0.0006503938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938476,0.000023350096,0.000094232295,0.00021795255,0.00014651864,0.00013321282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993824,0.0000235041,0.00018381525,0.00015632034,0.00022195854,0.00003203136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024939407,0.0000636694,0.00013408007,0.00016062192,0.00027408762,0.000005878608,0.00018088522,0.00018342205,0.000008593509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070248067,0.00007010515,0.000030480327,0.00034382544,0.0006679411,0.00030652594,0.00007609889,0.00011519209,0.0000034447596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011598199,0.0012235374,0.19212669,0.000531949,0.00044285468,0.000026608257,0.16291979,0.00013244517,0.00562338,0.61530447,0.0018633304,0.01864513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004099099,0.00069815526,0.044441722,0.00033124766,0.00039949577,0.000015200655,0.119210325,0.0000085045285,0.018255068,0.092999734,0.71897095,0.0005705023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012588071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005951712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7171076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093352304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009665264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2858805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007448233","doi":"","title":"An evaluation of the implementation of sector policing in the Eastern Cape","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Criminologica","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cape; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.18433433180565698,"score_gpt":0.446300000888135,"score_spread":0.261965669082478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007448233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98325,0.000023430017,0.0000027233955,0.0009795901,0.000133847,0.00033188387,0.000003735937,0.000008973789,0.0152657665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996053,0.000002481413,0.000058525722,0.0001626651,0.0001404289,0.000012946706,0.0000011322097,0.0000026548216,0.000013871748],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981485,0.0008536068,0.00018367103,0.00010631233,0.00054786034,0.00016003301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992493,0.00009681871,0.0001689826,0.00026946445,0.00020087737,0.000014585826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015526648,0.00004939323,0.00007859547,0.00003615245,0.00015585693,0.00001754353,0.0005453259,0.000054169483,0.00033016238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028659246,0.000027493576,0.000028063194,0.00023652148,0.00038226027,0.00013005803,0.000040691044,0.00006514747,0.00000435893],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009240934,0.000060779792,0.15216573,0.0000050452973,0.000007335085,1.2888434e-7,0.82337236,0.0000027244898,0.008060591,0.0052534607,0.00013449043,0.010928133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041729576,0.00029528845,0.759719,0.000016336773,0.00008865718,3.6238072e-7,0.22050028,0.00020331689,0.010736395,0.004569988,0.0033498325,0.00010324222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019084679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012061005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6075533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056382563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011452544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9874473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007700209","doi":"","title":"Practice and procedure - Indemnity costs - whether indemnity costs can be ordered in the Magistrates Courts - Beardmore v Franklins Management Services","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proctor/˜The œproctor","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indemnity; Appeal; Honour; Loan; Law; Business; Actuarial science; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.0164442105133994,"score_gpt":0.3192601052528514,"score_spread":0.30281589473945203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007700209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81583816,0.0045670993,0.000019655992,0.07060005,0.0005026367,0.0064077894,0.0001679996,0.00041205817,0.10148452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98926574,0.00025166062,0.00078003213,0.006480002,0.0006869472,0.00044603614,0.000021419415,0.000054939093,0.0020132489],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99510837,0.00096611463,0.000590768,0.00078727683,0.0015538578,0.0009936065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99753475,0.000669834,0.00044112813,0.0006774144,0.00040148498,0.00027535707],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030535925,0.0004810723,0.00041309386,0.00012660303,0.0013467845,0.0007994406,0.0015804245,0.00035642606,0.00019300435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064550317,0.00032906386,0.00008494763,0.0009459019,0.00089051906,0.000983318,0.00032615388,0.0010791823,0.00007042628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059648335,0.002091356,0.11748108,0.0008825575,0.00044821578,0.00013003865,0.82670546,0.000037944617,0.00011450668,0.022084577,0.00952368,0.019904114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001231979,0.00012799707,0.02677797,0.00017027215,0.0002132089,0.000020031517,0.07459891,0.0001589182,0.00007192996,0.0013153796,0.89460254,0.00071088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010061473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057553086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88507885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005908619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036452612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008441642","doi":"","title":"Challenges facing the South African Police Service and community-based organisations in the war against drugs in a South African township","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Criminologica","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Service (business); Political science; Criminology; Public administration; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.16874966938426905,"score_gpt":0.3331064451573235,"score_spread":0.16435677577305446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008441642","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88089234,0.00021185716,0.000003488414,0.033851754,0.00006829512,0.0005015642,0.000018054016,0.00011850068,0.08433417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946229,0.00005113378,0.00017565275,0.0048356,0.00017975712,0.00007506924,0.0000057166094,0.000017866476,0.00003633062],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953819,0.002763562,0.00032094345,0.00036160683,0.00045539663,0.00071660284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99688685,0.001813655,0.00018007409,0.0008510275,0.00016348579,0.0001048878],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028648383,0.00024297765,0.00027310496,0.00017631559,0.0020281137,0.00016139245,0.0017260262,0.0002146162,0.00004232374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010534298,0.00015173433,0.00004684488,0.0010365633,0.0013217245,0.00017607286,0.00030427883,0.0010834526,0.000042493426],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001826274,0.00009097166,0.0021919804,0.000013638032,0.000007005511,0.0000016469307,0.995517,0.0000029195257,0.00004853587,0.0013218767,0.000043822874,0.0007423093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030686014,0.00011149713,0.02132561,0.000028082968,0.000023931647,5.179482e-7,0.9517375,0.000030963245,0.000035920475,0.0010456117,0.025127945,0.00022550786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019738877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040175367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11373056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015934477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018416718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008469765","doi":"","title":"Costs on review - what charges are appropriate?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty of Law; School of Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Civil procedure; Actuarial science; Law; Operations research; Political science; Business; Engineering; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.09739257056085873,"score_gpt":0.38115776155142644,"score_spread":0.28376519099056774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008469765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020946998,0.040297616,0.000011011944,0.010649556,0.0012475816,0.0014440966,0.00025453453,0.00020354576,0.92494506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912185,0.0018303606,0.0010072099,0.0023096602,0.00029029069,0.000025638601,0.000038258113,0.000022977063,0.0032571256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973897,0.00030905457,0.00046565145,0.00030046693,0.0011857942,0.0003493327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980662,0.00009023964,0.0004515342,0.00045081362,0.00054066855,0.00040054054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013374427,0.00018388579,0.00057060074,0.000031943604,0.00016209614,0.00009705812,0.0006969494,0.0001606846,0.00041725658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010348088,0.0001545276,0.00016058724,0.00023955063,0.00068091,0.0008603372,0.0001001413,0.00024244488,0.0007685417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016636228,0.00070047023,0.0025881345,0.0015882066,0.0002007857,0.000045461107,0.07070192,0.00001591861,0.00019026716,0.81036156,0.10955224,0.0038886943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043805447,0.000120692326,0.00016592939,0.0027131694,0.000048856833,4.1405278e-7,0.0029784588,7.811188e-7,0.00097305403,0.0019253511,0.99041265,0.00022259563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037491692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006141168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97027147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001720016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013665094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9878305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008629474","doi":"","title":"Sector policing as a vehicle to deliver police-community relations in KwaZulu-Natal : Paulpietersburg and Ulundi police stations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Criminologica","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Community policing; Criminology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.08635408439607471,"score_gpt":0.3662337035169792,"score_spread":0.2798796191209045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008629474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9279131,0.000022796003,0.000018706567,0.0038158027,0.00012813971,0.0003230424,0.000030887066,0.0001589773,0.06758852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99556124,0.000016972197,0.0011251017,0.0018307595,0.0002545535,0.000032263735,0.0000064289184,0.000015905063,0.0011567664],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979701,0.0005645929,0.000270139,0.00028385146,0.00027614337,0.0006351966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984441,0.0006268962,0.000087853434,0.000402154,0.00016224613,0.0002767476],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048471813,0.00016730464,0.00019910684,0.00026416086,0.0014418145,0.00013666129,0.00052097137,0.0002031111,0.0003184775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009540109,0.00016428661,0.00004250864,0.00067325303,0.00068960816,0.00044182496,0.00033604857,0.00046748898,0.000447399],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031146566,0.00010497613,0.013100805,0.0000054477064,0.000017025444,0.000003176201,0.9758715,0.000002806977,0.0016344733,0.005836952,0.0019096497,0.0014820552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010359094,0.0010099314,0.5322123,0.00008845928,0.00009204615,0.000010494444,0.23929182,0.00007662937,0.00076339056,0.008105617,0.21635088,0.0009625146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41155356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09248006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73657966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026368504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000107858505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011319384","doi":"","title":"Default judgment - whether irregular - whether court has residual discretion not to set aside default judgment irregularly entered","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty of Law; School of Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Aside; Law; Residual; Political science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Linguistics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.057182657281343315,"score_gpt":0.3426607792697138,"score_spread":0.28547812198837047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011319384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64250386,0.0010617152,0.0067447354,0.048362095,0.0019516121,0.00516918,0.0036979627,0.00071414665,0.2897947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797923,0.0000046339737,0.008821568,0.00083789043,0.00043155006,0.00006797985,0.00019544362,0.0000698909,0.009778736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940816,0.0005825511,0.001135798,0.0007748675,0.0025137623,0.00091138034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973991,0.00013693399,0.0005732076,0.0008662756,0.00054688985,0.00047757482],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016540473,0.00047646338,0.0007773981,0.0001338162,0.0006302223,0.00031365483,0.0010535584,0.00040879904,0.001237206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020234386,0.00044695823,0.00035904036,0.00035979605,0.0013836548,0.00072857895,0.00023098558,0.00038852668,0.0004482038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002238032,0.0031345768,0.008259414,0.0005097517,0.0011970064,0.00017528425,0.25962973,0.006300527,0.10641116,0.34652206,0.26437366,0.0012487926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021549163,0.00045434304,0.0066575063,0.00040036644,0.00022100488,0.0000028681714,0.0047310684,0.000032387925,0.042398788,0.006113795,0.9359061,0.0009268476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055086438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014668935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67153245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047452893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020626241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011632388","doi":"10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.133","title":"Outsourcing and Tendering Complexities in the South African Public Sector Institutions: A Demise of New Public Management Theory?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Reviews on Global Economics","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demise; Procurement; Outsourcing; Public sector; Business; Political science; Economics; Economy; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.13617364792431594,"score_gpt":0.33461809890062266,"score_spread":0.19844445097630672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011632388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43772942,0.037162226,0.0009967686,0.00954198,0.0010707888,0.0016150743,0.00003350163,0.000022576536,0.51182765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994687,0.0031822645,0.0013585057,0.00048368346,0.00015998502,0.0000033091042,3.973669e-7,0.000004880839,0.00011995097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983484,0.000371666,0.00070868793,0.00013778289,0.00017643005,0.00025703482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986988,0.00012009342,0.0007638046,0.00022062592,0.00005662339,0.00014009827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003428915,0.00012323364,0.00045308977,0.00012189127,0.00011739427,0.00022219705,0.00062703487,0.000050272127,0.000066651366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004492166,0.000086835156,0.00014590567,0.00029910478,0.00017937472,0.0004516887,0.00008460759,0.00019017125,0.000018552513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002456416,0.00004273133,0.010551204,0.00007440471,0.00004965806,0.0000032483933,0.033375908,0.00016875555,2.072813e-7,0.9395495,0.00024371373,0.015916105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004974635,0.00007812858,0.002129415,0.00022405508,0.000034819528,0.000008305758,0.031506177,0.00003059375,3.118157e-7,0.022331396,0.94303006,0.00012927354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000856652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002664668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94278634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000391589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026312808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35410348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012966730","doi":"","title":"Eenvoudige adoptie van pleegkinderen","year":2019,"lang":"nl","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Research and Documentation Center (WODC) (Scientific Research and Documentation Center)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"L'Alliance Boviteq","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Humanities; Theology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09597449817026094,"score_gpt":0.4349271570950536,"score_spread":0.33895265892479265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012966730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9019994,0.004139002,0.00013343841,0.0059425174,0.011723273,0.0072985766,0.0010290142,0.00020503851,0.0675297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7396996,0.0016066645,0.00031269182,0.00010209485,0.0005264253,0.00023528033,0.0014260067,0.00009386414,0.2559974],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.970184,0.0047674244,0.0020645258,0.004990931,0.01255458,0.0054384996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880519,0.001694902,0.0006144123,0.0021719523,0.0044817664,0.0029850486],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.027871685,0.0009585848,0.00096528727,0.00445316,0.01145591,0.03755001,0.0025247284,0.0005723142,0.017929265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006864347,0.000938343,0.00030234357,0.008359625,0.013950127,0.008635422,0.0026231231,0.002514597,0.012983438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026207014,0.00554832,0.29449865,0.001995727,0.0006558864,0.00018164108,0.26417103,0.000034480803,0.012326503,0.050101,0.35197997,0.01588606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009709742,0.0022591434,0.0062466846,0.0009654774,0.000054144377,0.000026226375,0.12602971,0.0006179679,0.002932282,0.034638442,0.8148893,0.0016308442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022229063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015592173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46290934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015251299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015145722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013873445","doi":"","title":"The end of the rope: The Criminal Law’s perspective regarding Acts of Consensual Sexual Violence between adult partners within the South African, English and Canadian legal frameworks.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"ResearchSpace (University of KwaZulu-Natal)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Rope; Criminology; Law; Political science; Sexual violence; English law; Sexual assault; Psychology; Engineering; Medicine; Human factors and ergonomics; Medical emergency; Poison control; Computer science; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.025367168913446557,"score_gpt":0.3167061869184492,"score_spread":0.29133901800500267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013873445","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.878532,0.00095322944,0.000006897346,0.009100051,0.0005495952,0.0013347452,0.0007232197,0.000031186017,0.10876908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99320203,0.00014653878,0.000080361766,0.000021579943,0.00025094775,0.0000019922422,0.00001834982,0.000024505041,0.0062536886],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952053,0.0014351164,0.00025365315,0.0005060917,0.0018664435,0.0007333839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936765,0.0018390407,0.0006954944,0.00083889125,0.0026061814,0.00034388452],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027716972,0.00027218898,0.00044729188,0.00016517697,0.0034870298,0.00016840272,0.002567662,0.0005575861,0.000043259588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005475566,0.00017324081,0.00017986972,0.00093446806,0.011134146,0.00030407342,0.0004126312,0.001998889,0.000005792235],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028518136,0.000015971875,0.0010923103,0.00008047319,0.00025706826,0.000010708729,0.8179105,0.0000059395425,0.000014486342,0.17852443,0.0014756038,0.00032732458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002449802,0.00009986223,0.002677607,0.0003157061,0.00019549209,7.4824936e-7,0.96572,0.000022138815,0.00015299441,0.000849367,0.02952222,0.00019887804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6210343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87180275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25076842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048868847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031696956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016085588","doi":"","title":"Is die hersieningsgrond \"rasionaliteit\" in artikel 6(2)(f)(ii) van wet 3 van 2000 van toepassing op huishoudelike dissiplinêre tribunale?National Horseracing Authority of Southern Africa v Naidoo 2010 3 SA 182 (KZP) : regspraak","year":2012,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Journal of South African Law / Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Art; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04007099994512386,"score_gpt":0.31370415904160354,"score_spread":0.2736331590964797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016085588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7289091,0.04813453,0.0024024644,0.022188792,0.009358245,0.0033851739,0.00747901,0.00043786448,0.17770487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733219,0.0002637704,0.004314058,0.00042475457,0.0051236846,0.000038923554,0.00005983898,0.00030698988,0.016146088],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97817874,0.0027481786,0.0060459822,0.0017476606,0.0070958366,0.0041835746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843924,0.0015897356,0.0065021035,0.0014737084,0.003292318,0.0027497243],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012420803,0.0019533313,0.0035282706,0.001561788,0.0026869571,0.000742884,0.0030336273,0.0016846565,0.0021100522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003072363,0.0018661278,0.001960839,0.0037027758,0.0033424713,0.0036730804,0.0010146886,0.004036135,0.00041934836],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025031609,0.0044933143,0.03266381,0.0005540516,0.001347354,0.00038695792,0.9269309,0.0012205599,0.0027274166,0.0076077543,0.016494466,0.0030702387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005578939,0.0013523516,0.0033631488,0.0029871943,0.0015152526,0.00007700094,0.1717049,0.00045098,0.0012988371,0.010778952,0.7974184,0.0034740076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023118206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012397853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78092396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029575345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032053846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3021099728","doi":"10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.142","title":"Impacts of Coal Mining in Witbank, Mpumalanga Province of South Africa: An Eco-Legal Perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Reviews on Global Economics","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Coal; Coal mining; Business; Geography; Natural resource economics; Mining engineering; Environmental planning; Environmental protection; Economics; Geology; Archaeology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.027746429918937266,"score_gpt":0.32114896814476546,"score_spread":0.2934025382258282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3021099728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9440631,0.0069751292,0.000006839885,0.0001751376,0.00042917964,0.0004030477,0.000045121033,0.000004495704,0.047897942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969549,0.0011192058,0.0015525691,0.000066565655,0.00019687072,0.0000011433502,4.821071e-7,0.000009544741,0.00009872644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978334,0.00033884463,0.0010886212,0.00020222193,0.00022492527,0.00031203678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99724114,0.00010407111,0.0019882808,0.00025411454,0.00021439814,0.00019798298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022522064,0.00016522055,0.00092348334,0.00011636772,0.000039053204,0.000045112356,0.0005880561,0.000119081305,0.000070694696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006669471,0.00014237585,0.00025928285,0.00023002845,0.00018807959,0.0006196912,0.000051641007,0.00023888396,0.000030519408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012576544,0.0010611766,0.47387484,0.00041518445,0.00024704062,0.00006469017,0.35541448,0.002685845,0.000050811643,0.15702048,0.0015585808,0.00634922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0058980393,0.0068816133,0.040962923,0.0034704842,0.00032529936,0.000046632653,0.15434895,0.0004145657,0.00022993376,0.005348516,0.78060806,0.0014649816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005258253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013167725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77904946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010258491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000839634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58059186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3021493680","doi":"","title":"The Power of Prevention: The extent of Environmental Authority in the Context of Local Government","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Government (linguistics); Local government; Sociology; Local authority; Political science; Public administration; Geography; Linguistics; Archaeology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011079794982840754,"score_gpt":0.26665610186646144,"score_spread":0.2555763068836207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3021493680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9067611,0.002177512,0.00004212957,0.0016827985,0.0005005743,0.0009761325,0.00007206851,0.000007766057,0.087779924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974607,0.000050558025,0.0000326887,0.00012756388,0.00004557056,0.000017045397,5.8161913e-7,0.000005837997,0.0022594116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974859,0.0006131643,0.0003861878,0.00015314204,0.0011438242,0.00021778845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987349,0.00042974172,0.0002589013,0.0005116489,0.000020760966,0.00004406954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020878073,0.00009100703,0.00018185469,0.0000063244947,0.00018597128,0.00002463646,0.00080624665,0.00007219415,0.00083593966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009699926,0.000048275822,0.00013376135,0.00013340518,0.0011651225,0.00011510861,0.00013913307,0.00022559299,0.0000591939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019936095,0.0007375848,0.03433203,0.00003483645,0.000097835655,0.000003074384,0.1409802,0.00003634266,0.0011466607,0.81421334,0.0010421085,0.0071766367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010800206,0.0004668653,0.0659069,0.00010549315,0.000053824348,9.4749566e-7,0.32567087,0.000025903759,0.004162229,0.0059967088,0.59630555,0.00022470258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016142562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017600706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80821663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015406574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058048365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9152953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022419904","doi":"","title":"Statutory Recognition of Indigenous Custom Adoption: Its Role in Strengthening Self-Governance Over Child Welfare","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Statutory law; Corporate governance; Welfare; Business; Sociology; Law; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.009240907442018293,"score_gpt":0.2480614602751862,"score_spread":0.2388205528331679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022419904","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7955689,0.0018365633,0.000001570979,0.00016255777,0.00052172056,0.0004879214,0.00008573822,0.00013515426,0.2011999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976582,0.00014896248,0.00062214106,0.000119775585,0.00031587825,0.000024334258,0.000018892502,0.000027573607,0.001064271],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774635,0.00024221282,0.00039739214,0.00037858935,0.0007267767,0.00050870207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990021,0.00007543062,0.00029971826,0.0003140277,0.00014224934,0.00016646838],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005628682,0.00017685836,0.00028375897,0.000067169385,0.0003718486,0.00008226764,0.00040848218,0.0002251358,0.001937091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001560473,0.00019553406,0.00008778808,0.00048514796,0.00012932501,0.00083926076,0.00008431675,0.0004877482,0.0007350469],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037518173,0.0013192897,0.28987247,0.00047684985,0.00021932126,0.00009074569,0.42227653,0.00078656955,0.0006276439,0.26092675,0.00050051184,0.022528136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014678633,0.00015517707,0.05549025,0.00038319093,0.00003641503,0.000001654758,0.0085273655,0.000049861137,0.00085866277,0.00084471086,0.9315375,0.0006473451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064875563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053863428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.931037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037916552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015715831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022508769","doi":"10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.141","title":"Critical Analysis of the “Duty of Care” in the Protection of the South African Environment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Reviews on Global Economics","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.022144665527835297,"score_gpt":0.2997688685096839,"score_spread":0.2776242029818486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022508769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9745167,0.0053442055,0.000024860388,0.0021441437,0.00045579672,0.0008389109,0.00005884027,0.0000010511848,0.016615497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987372,0.000969096,0.00011354826,0.000105141255,0.00005160754,0.0000030563197,1.0123096e-7,0.0000025437134,0.000017670012],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979103,0.0007444166,0.00083384133,0.00009897622,0.00028344593,0.00012901952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981408,0.0001237353,0.0012379874,0.000393719,0.000069227084,0.00003451055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021386333,0.00008336467,0.00054366345,0.000047077956,0.00005815265,0.00001614179,0.0008051501,0.00006330601,0.000056978195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000596767,0.000040641677,0.00060033525,0.0004893781,0.00033069536,0.00008406033,0.00006434173,0.0002004869,0.000005577143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055789313,0.0009825148,0.42863387,0.000643672,0.0011758433,0.0000018654814,0.3660184,0.027928438,0.0001044551,0.13240737,0.00036219682,0.041183468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008873018,0.00097240414,0.1658212,0.00071056583,0.0023193816,0.0000037102818,0.049579334,0.00039629097,0.00027534095,0.003746253,0.7749411,0.0003471296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002259919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031753827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7745789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003733211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012913937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16573194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033719684","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2020.1773017","title":"Remedying formal irregularities in wills: a comparative analysis of testamentary rescue in Canada and South Africa","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Foundation; Louisiana State University","keywords":"Testamentary trust; Law; Statute; Jurisprudence; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03996326956342198,"score_gpt":0.2599483294766122,"score_spread":0.21998505991319026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033719684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9606287,0.00037435064,0.0000564519,0.0015184804,0.000054343574,0.00014928254,0.00006729194,0.000009425532,0.037141662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990118,0.000119655546,0.00060263893,0.00020273925,0.000025981031,1.6539471e-7,0.000003526256,0.000003260096,0.000030205887],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981784,0.0004669295,0.00032559322,0.00015846871,0.0004400937,0.0004304686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990889,0.00019926805,0.00020948185,0.00009215341,0.00008251583,0.00032772537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005781958,0.000107322165,0.00045573,0.00025816457,0.00056204834,0.00003746202,0.00037136103,0.000053008564,0.000045181405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005020436,0.00012014974,0.00006254851,0.0014938513,0.00031185016,0.0005464399,0.00015398762,0.00047444488,1.1575285e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002368317,0.000034265606,0.44562656,0.000029316428,0.00015918474,0.000218016,0.534805,0.0013619574,0.0000023255568,0.017091667,0.000101217425,0.00033365353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016266509,0.00014719876,0.073663145,0.00012294513,0.00026194486,0.0000019990189,0.78391474,0.0036822585,0.000007644053,0.00023038723,0.1360085,0.00033256185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9009472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3719634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011026668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009421708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48995644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036560524","doi":"10.7939/r3-pj8n-ed15","title":"Housing First Programs in Alberta and the Right to Housing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Alberta Library","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental planning; Business; Political science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.016007247638656665,"score_gpt":0.20620752067561196,"score_spread":0.1902002730369553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036560524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6636339,0.00013018325,0.000029925002,0.11387142,0.0000731089,0.00050999917,0.0000011127732,0.000051527775,0.22169884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952871,0.000030004983,0.0012544313,0.0006857067,0.00006776603,1.7825528e-7,0.0000022179452,0.000009699929,0.0026628736],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991687,0.00013852847,0.00009624848,0.00020990468,0.00016767552,0.00021892863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991562,0.00047634958,0.000057732817,0.00012571304,0.000011410745,0.00017259769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009264748,0.00008339104,0.00017968054,0.00004820579,0.00036923503,0.000072862094,0.0004438725,0.000069024856,0.00021308204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014663917,0.0000754136,0.000049235572,0.0005684372,0.00059287,0.000675094,0.00031472376,0.0001185326,0.000030568594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021954648,0.00003261539,0.059189808,0.000022007738,0.00001796533,0.000021558251,0.9109086,0.00002875258,0.00000160327,0.026881283,0.0017972084,0.00087909144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009585147,0.000045954508,0.0009319295,0.00007628539,0.000024239056,1.9126054e-7,0.021610882,0.00026082117,0.000024341205,0.0004827792,0.97540313,0.0001809313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.065921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052888338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97360593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020030197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008023361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.964394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039473221","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.08","title":"The Imperilled Right to Life, Femicide Crisis in South Africa: Critical Considerations for Legislators","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Femicide; Criminology; Legislature; State (computer science); Human rights; Law; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Poison control; Domestic violence; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.09012589169491791,"score_gpt":0.3763832856786459,"score_spread":0.28625739398372796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039473221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.622622,0.002150435,0.0021456424,0.36809936,0.0022708382,0.00020995594,0.000023654953,0.000017986027,0.0024600876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916925,0.00006168049,0.0014527494,0.0059053176,0.00083697715,0.000012286414,4.722935e-7,0.0000058973046,0.00003211728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986222,0.00034073243,0.0004426777,0.00014564722,0.00017928124,0.000269474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960164,0.0030713193,0.00014183526,0.000052177606,0.0005254719,0.000192791],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006443044,0.00008317355,0.00023897066,0.00009383072,0.0003611376,0.00005697633,0.00035038058,0.00019031942,0.00008944336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013532966,0.0000626761,0.00008929342,0.00002294693,0.0009901008,0.00011756517,0.000069126865,0.00031325145,0.00000900827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018368843,0.000016857011,0.001047293,0.00000153766,0.00008197693,0.000038576676,0.37844658,0.000014680623,0.00006853761,0.6134003,0.00659415,0.000105863335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014078657,0.0005000563,0.0014182973,0.0000125901315,0.00008070874,0.000027972428,0.056465846,0.00005925369,0.00011581173,0.6418054,0.29788917,0.00021703687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024201938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025111922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36907047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006269341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030015668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046978994","doi":"10.3366/ajicl.2020.0323","title":"What Weight (If Any) Should Be Attached to Children's Wishes and Views in Child Relocation Disputes? Lessons from Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of International and Comparative Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relocation; Agency (philosophy); Best interests; Affect (linguistics); Political science; Law; Family law; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.08598854467025008,"score_gpt":0.3488582449759353,"score_spread":0.26286970030568524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046978994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78938395,0.00251105,0.00012081346,0.1920609,0.00058363215,0.00019507788,0.00007586793,0.000007955407,0.015060775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99552155,0.00021932476,0.00035426876,0.00343114,0.00038502776,0.0000058037836,0.000010143131,0.0000049082428,0.00006784767],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853754,0.0002018744,0.0003478081,0.00019343781,0.0005704042,0.00014892488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990949,0.00019006466,0.0002416157,0.000055538465,0.00015139219,0.00026648492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022702973,0.00011635711,0.0002753125,0.000052169693,0.00021224588,0.00018693335,0.00036623547,0.00002909987,0.00016428625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080466314,0.00010114339,0.000034830005,0.0002364505,0.00018892421,0.00063499395,0.00009913133,0.0002765249,0.0000012432323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004755078,0.00021428191,0.15802172,0.0000060445614,0.000404964,0.000095288604,0.58527297,0.00048468044,0.000100869496,0.24139626,0.010836283,0.002691115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009489815,0.00023222298,0.13920332,0.00013839887,0.00003904144,0.0000129202435,0.057373364,0.00020739868,0.00021724372,0.0019530082,0.7993219,0.00035221758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12126931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30097046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7884856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017129145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015549587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8845822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3047893425","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340060","title":"The Powers of the South African Public Protector: A Note on Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker of the National Assembly","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Scope (computer science); Political science; Relation (database); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05807562474425876,"score_gpt":0.3166075339409355,"score_spread":0.25853190919667673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3047893425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4123974,0.0039701015,0.00005393921,0.38839072,0.005402744,0.0017714472,0.00022179566,0.00005049304,0.18774135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984617,0.00004181259,0.00009821422,0.00034304816,0.0007093596,0.0000082549595,6.461769e-8,0.000015207489,0.0003222949],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967048,0.00063487975,0.0007322347,0.00018613799,0.0013761402,0.00036576652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99666506,0.0008409734,0.0014925596,0.00022213788,0.0006422147,0.00013707436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015918732,0.00018820656,0.00043401157,0.0000623679,0.0008898846,0.0001150252,0.0016379376,0.000056803237,0.000025534167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004060843,0.00008975788,0.00044267724,0.0006169139,0.0020205881,0.0002603358,0.00029227496,0.00050701614,0.000008706117],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058432424,0.00018577368,0.010175791,0.000047923742,0.0019422,0.0000100943635,0.85854816,0.0012859222,0.0006111287,0.084960654,0.040609457,0.00103856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085426925,0.00057804125,0.005452027,0.00012377239,0.00014546458,0.0000033441736,0.11587365,0.000050552204,0.00065260316,0.0014576393,0.8745244,0.0002842513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002068849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038017263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83391494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004346401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086276326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74449414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048084044","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340059","title":"Is There a Need for Legislative Recognition of Rehabilitative Maintenance in South Africa? Lessons from Specified States of the United States of America","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Legislature; Discretion; Order (exchange); Law; Spouse; Business; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.10222546332533636,"score_gpt":0.348290597979472,"score_spread":0.24606513465413563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048084044","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94988745,0.0059307283,0.00090393756,0.035200596,0.0002700994,0.0009144239,0.0019325592,0.000015982027,0.0049442374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955643,0.00049171376,0.0035905952,0.00013375316,0.00009867645,0.000013196095,0.0000033025158,0.0000167305,0.00008774945],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970879,0.00069426384,0.0010473006,0.00021529042,0.00063357444,0.00032169453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930413,0.0028942116,0.0020216114,0.0001537952,0.001792367,0.00009675756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075276324,0.00019551133,0.0009052098,0.0001592284,0.00014761524,0.000017724618,0.000538298,0.000056026107,0.000031977354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042517213,0.00013165732,0.00030183952,0.001666505,0.002153315,0.00025267963,0.000120482844,0.00030563097,0.0000010168269],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008628412,0.0001120914,0.0037961197,0.000052392643,0.000467805,0.0000035133833,0.9916727,0.00018450036,0.0002071705,0.0006202526,0.0014039982,0.00061660755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011042324,0.0010428127,0.0025565743,0.00044865144,0.00014792584,1.3468744e-7,0.9412356,0.0000836882,0.0014457097,0.01368112,0.038083803,0.00016975633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024709722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002598017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050437115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014348468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022128593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79339796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048599398","doi":"","title":"Consent, Coercion, and Shared Parenting: Ruffudeen-Coutts v Coutts","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05136468322551728,"score_gpt":0.3043930437155806,"score_spread":0.25302836049006333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048599398","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46598035,0.006693127,0.0002506315,0.009736799,0.0043377765,0.0003746816,0.00010978855,0.00005561708,0.51246125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967422,0.000038896724,0.00032045937,0.0013199792,0.0005599413,0.0000011156512,0.000003197201,0.00001614738,0.0009980673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833655,0.00024064694,0.0003846929,0.00015635951,0.00036836002,0.0005133985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976,0.00025117726,0.00026027224,0.00016034098,0.00038404585,0.0013441326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011134427,0.0001296797,0.00027687466,0.00013365748,0.00065936893,0.0003228533,0.00040882087,0.00012757172,0.00011476612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089234393,0.00012747118,0.00007745343,0.00019527931,0.00089287374,0.00030924022,0.000017788643,0.00026572295,0.00006152752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004458633,0.000045202472,0.11579744,0.000061599705,0.00016289526,0.00051637867,0.16374148,0.000023027393,0.00035567238,0.53840417,0.1782839,0.0025636596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039464346,0.000052718467,0.006415377,0.000090669535,0.000033809236,0.000011878108,0.003145872,0.00000924807,0.000012673343,0.0028633985,0.9868019,0.00016780253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04722714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20334613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.808518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017225454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013532345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9591175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091380475","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.65","title":"Victimisation of African Foreign Nationals in Durban, South Africa","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign national; Victimisation; Criminology; Deportation; Harm; Government (linguistics); Political science; Harassment; Law enforcement; Xenophobia; Law; Politics; Sociology; Immigration; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.09142455886152369,"score_gpt":0.3435112650397908,"score_spread":0.2520867061782671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3091380475","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95911807,0.0011433355,0.00088091404,0.01608997,0.00051723805,0.000081869344,0.000012027477,0.00001089227,0.022145662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980222,0.000096145195,0.00085741264,0.00056658726,0.0004005265,0.0000022262295,0.0000020648265,0.0000048583997,0.000047999893],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985871,0.00033247197,0.0004904326,0.00011973053,0.0003055836,0.00016468475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984215,0.0004614353,0.0004741918,0.000039516937,0.0005211391,0.000082207924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000577455,0.00007472966,0.00026001825,0.00019887177,0.000059643462,0.000010314671,0.00039174885,0.00020352451,0.00017946518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017533754,0.0000712905,0.000073050236,0.000038862494,0.0008787559,0.00017029508,0.00005588736,0.00027414746,0.000005491365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020818862,0.00004629266,0.017437236,0.0000053201343,0.0000996735,0.00003853961,0.51056206,0.00006682595,0.00023131479,0.47018713,0.00024635321,0.0008710579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036504243,0.00094927027,0.06283664,0.000055453736,0.00011615248,0.000042351807,0.07842459,0.00028046692,0.0005086111,0.7519043,0.10083511,0.0003966076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003946635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000054352513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4321375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075479686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020486566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32378125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094339767","doi":"","title":"The Historic Re-Run Election in Malawi and the Future of Governance – Paul Mkandawire","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Conversation; Political science; History; Library science; Media studies; Public administration; Sociology; Management; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.00482240540984081,"score_gpt":0.24859184303538007,"score_spread":0.24376943762553926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094339767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19355784,0.020868815,0.0000099657955,0.023690889,0.0022861883,0.0006371476,0.0000026304742,0.000043565844,0.75890297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95950246,0.0010637952,0.000030857405,0.00009406111,0.00022644155,0.0000070411484,1.3329418e-7,0.0000037214525,0.03907149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991717,0.00016016352,0.00012414584,0.00011218143,0.00027628458,0.0001555554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994501,0.0002306543,0.000090720845,0.00016679366,0.00004069696,0.000021051084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076211966,0.00005128132,0.0000991637,0.000008567398,0.00021330187,0.000032635915,0.00022082115,0.000064600485,0.00011666301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010706471,0.000025964411,0.000028376471,0.0002979066,0.00027727403,0.0001097945,0.000033376546,0.00013131257,0.000019300907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019333808,0.000024799894,0.024609316,0.000014571788,0.00001322848,0.0000012025416,0.105905786,0.0000049934633,0.000056879762,0.8328968,0.01931514,0.016963918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003514253,0.00001850907,0.0035046686,0.0000061217243,0.0000035871847,1.6730723e-7,0.0064808987,0.000030300434,0.00002926506,0.0024929538,0.9870331,0.000048954862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00348159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011368998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.967718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012653995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052014308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63441676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3099010709","doi":"","title":"Contextualizing alternate dispute resolution: an agile approach to resolve disputes in infrastructure projects","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Online dispute resolution; Agile software development; Business; Dispute mechanism; Critical infrastructure; Alternative dispute resolution; Resolution (logic); Law and economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.05947191633760109,"score_gpt":0.3299700783830015,"score_spread":0.27049816204540045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3099010709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08925147,0.0005188916,0.015063289,0.0101538375,0.0005650877,0.0020093503,0.000040779767,0.0007283858,0.8816689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96844167,0.000009907792,0.027233575,0.0025952964,0.0007105063,0.000049034785,0.000013185726,0.000022793982,0.00092402997],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976333,0.00032111222,0.00030945233,0.0005879739,0.00057018275,0.00057798787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989854,0.00007374754,0.00007234491,0.00027757953,0.00008496176,0.00050595135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047000224,0.00018137052,0.00025929956,0.000088623594,0.00028509556,0.00022725147,0.00073516427,0.00013707117,0.0001086911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067548046,0.00016273587,0.00005279325,0.0009971656,0.00020601712,0.00058996095,0.00023680716,0.00029648628,0.00007486304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009698368,0.000088981695,0.011998021,0.0000327366,0.000016828266,0.000027185903,0.79474336,0.0009086269,0.00025959002,0.17913009,0.009812678,0.0028849065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010452274,0.0003077001,0.004944892,0.00007303142,0.000019353572,0.000001924301,0.08299445,0.010821651,0.00028942386,0.0024958036,0.89611435,0.00089219684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035055366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015186896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88630164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015773173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014190984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6636176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3102961379","doi":"10.18357/ijcyfs114202019941","title":"DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION OF THE CHILD CARE SYSTEM IN LITHUANIA","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Child Youth and Family Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Scope (computer science); Politics; Christian ministry; Social security; Process (computing); Political science; Qualitative research; Public administration; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.031505174493361654,"score_gpt":0.302321469300907,"score_spread":0.2708162948075453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3102961379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83729774,0.070187494,0.00027270333,0.026618423,0.004044613,0.00034402136,0.0001359359,0.00002751778,0.06107158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99765396,0.00067964697,0.00005617497,0.0009816303,0.0006172413,7.9403657e-7,0.0000011244539,0.000003558583,0.0000058633404],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987688,0.00008828455,0.0003630709,0.00008291806,0.0006103012,0.00008661675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989374,0.000047595924,0.00029089794,0.00004117666,0.00063101266,0.000051876304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002112295,0.000070279006,0.00017896987,0.00006441868,0.0001734239,0.00002953712,0.0003448344,0.00003622005,0.0000012881582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005502403,0.000048008118,0.0000749116,0.00017929218,0.0002904619,0.00015782336,0.000093946765,0.00014551621,8.0768905e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011083707,0.00003142586,0.11522766,0.00005588054,0.00026377235,0.00001843047,0.84946376,0.0003992366,0.000008617519,0.03321806,0.00027669562,0.0009256286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021682584,0.00014049094,0.14659825,0.0020921184,0.00014572083,0.00001697766,0.7417105,0.000048520615,0.00012320868,0.0003419293,0.10636159,0.00025241723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010040704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000058630096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16035625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001127869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000068246794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19577143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108152910","doi":"10.1002/iir.1400","title":"The impact of constitutional property law on insolvency law in South Africa","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Legislation; Law; Creditor; Constitution; Property (philosophy); Numerus clausus; Law and economics; Business; Real property; Property rights; Property law; Political science; Economics; Finance; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08609690609543058,"score_gpt":0.3776087350731606,"score_spread":0.29151182897773004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108152910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00055663235,0.040807102,0.00004082411,0.010404738,0.00051406026,0.000852298,0.00011711129,0.00005824192,0.946649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99327695,0.004201089,0.000102983526,0.0016754244,0.0002663745,0.000061242026,0.000010021774,0.000009269606,0.00039665267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771357,0.0002786622,0.0006139492,0.0002834278,0.00081787386,0.00029249664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988028,0.00024617213,0.0002647898,0.00021500455,0.0003244493,0.00014682923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007744255,0.0001685211,0.00031756063,0.0000331721,0.00026958005,0.00007415662,0.0009919114,0.000073062525,0.00057724596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013699675,0.000094631105,0.00027782802,0.00045041132,0.0014806598,0.00029564035,0.00010710682,0.00030962302,0.00026443126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037217305,0.00011206552,0.0008658229,0.00007246918,0.000051605413,0.0000103450575,0.014455817,0.000035143752,0.000011725638,0.98094213,0.0021640086,0.0012416652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022690739,0.00013653436,0.00013637032,0.0010687154,0.000013578448,6.4927025e-7,0.00018460106,0.000047645488,0.000010639232,0.003606368,0.99441624,0.00015173125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013244395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020393437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9927203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002588273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040728896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63204384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110999353","doi":"","title":"2011. 03. 058. Требилкок М. , Дэниэлс Р. Реформа господства права и развитие: намечая тонкую тропу прогресса. Trebilcock M. j. , Daniels R. j. rule of law reform and development: charting the fragile path of progress. - Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2008. - 372 p. - Rec. Ad Op. : ceric I. // Canadien j. of law and society. - Calgary, 2010. - Vol. 25, n 1. - p. 121-122","year":2011,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Социальные и гуманитарные науки. Отечественная и зарубежная литература. Сер. 4, Государство и право: Реферативный журнал","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Path (computing); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02956775104682746,"score_gpt":0.25688782350121336,"score_spread":0.2273200724543859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110999353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4774938,0.14333378,0.00033222308,0.00410251,0.012936796,0.016657019,0.004498925,0.0017818125,0.33886313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9594208,0.006998232,0.01480609,0.001423979,0.0015743801,0.0009094088,0.000613113,0.0010082804,0.013245698],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97179127,0.0021942141,0.008661749,0.0049535027,0.005436904,0.006962391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9786973,0.0013916128,0.008322397,0.004856224,0.0033978277,0.003334654],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009251601,0.004198641,0.006471035,0.0009359589,0.004406283,0.0006604837,0.005985115,0.003356488,0.0058593624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00113643,0.003700868,0.0017796811,0.0029174741,0.015994085,0.0034666324,0.0041182847,0.004016796,0.0005128769],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024915857,0.008725922,0.017280087,0.008163484,0.0061301817,0.0006188809,0.8072435,0.000022782255,0.0044040373,0.066251114,0.043911334,0.03475704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014833105,0.0043679657,0.023781957,0.0044720764,0.0042479555,0.00041119,0.052934725,0.0011366023,0.037252072,0.0070511107,0.83918965,0.010321606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.120678455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029611595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7952783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021844737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038137657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111597585","doi":"10.47689/2181-1415-vol1-iss2-pp104-116","title":"Contextualizing alternate dispute resolution: an agile approach to resolve disputes in infrastructure projects","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Общество и инновации","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Agile software development; Resolution (logic); Business; Online dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Critical infrastructure; Political science; Computer science; Law; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.05915888088027054,"score_gpt":0.3301266905315525,"score_spread":0.270967809651282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111597585","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31816843,0.0024231141,0.012109952,0.016100982,0.0019776525,0.0045447806,0.00019670985,0.001468893,0.6430095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97961307,0.000027948168,0.015766252,0.002423352,0.0013059018,0.00009411686,0.000030742813,0.000048113816,0.000690486],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963544,0.0005312048,0.0005019112,0.00087562914,0.00083746563,0.00089937175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983965,0.000116118215,0.00015626279,0.00045275025,0.00012767663,0.00075069745],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076252746,0.00030297993,0.00042383978,0.00015298955,0.00043967544,0.00028637334,0.0011007296,0.00024371303,0.00010878176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011540598,0.00029283355,0.000096339885,0.0013986956,0.00031089626,0.0007580809,0.00031616585,0.00055094674,0.00015155847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021810111,0.00018835682,0.018113485,0.00007457547,0.000040124633,0.00008112088,0.8498867,0.0016862396,0.00085990794,0.10793301,0.013831336,0.007087014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011261228,0.00029797305,0.0061956006,0.00010632411,0.000027521923,0.0000033259373,0.029483143,0.0045783552,0.00032004912,0.0018902126,0.95505327,0.0009181266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022875941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009324215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9412219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024035815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023133746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114177557","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340070","title":"The Case for the Constitutionalisation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ESCRs) in Botswana","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Cultural rights; Human rights; Social rights; Political science; Accountability; Fundamental rights; Constitution; International human rights law; Politics; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.09728896319440221,"score_gpt":0.37992898036501344,"score_spread":0.2826400171706112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114177557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7601193,0.034571353,0.00023443873,0.18775159,0.0014568027,0.0008202712,0.000072298644,0.000016978998,0.014956949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988113,0.00023984692,0.00013707043,0.000078733974,0.00067900144,0.000005545248,1.0278907e-7,0.0000023816367,0.00004602736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991133,0.00014737107,0.0003568299,0.000073200325,0.00016260681,0.00014665282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983169,0.0010417331,0.0003302526,0.000032797056,0.00022939431,0.000048949256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008655928,0.00006944698,0.00021081354,0.000019462186,0.0011680044,0.00007229688,0.00018495433,0.000025594441,0.0000043193922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006000806,0.000036147827,0.00008326471,0.000107230284,0.0016779002,0.00026090795,0.000042960863,0.00012653942,6.898857e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018547504,0.000014710074,0.0012916084,0.0000116943065,0.0002950452,0.00007920412,0.4036484,0.000052649917,0.000011322644,0.5853628,0.007539855,0.0015072474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007284128,0.00014604378,0.00041980785,0.000014694464,0.000090843925,0.00003773842,0.2847719,0.000057967107,0.000036737438,0.009269274,0.704321,0.00010558839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011508968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004156372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69678116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011951543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014119323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89834636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114308825","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340072","title":"Strategic Litigation in South Africa and Uganda: Shared Perspectives and Comparative Lessons","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Sanitation; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Government (linguistics); Political science; Economic growth; Public administration; Development economics; Law; Economics; Geography; Medicine","score_opus":0.20546898267733332,"score_gpt":0.37960530496386546,"score_spread":0.17413632228653214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114308825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8780549,0.059242763,0.000023498345,0.024998609,0.000119826414,0.00023097999,0.00002502835,0.000027235266,0.03727716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985137,0.0005316128,0.0005298862,0.000046731406,0.0002671227,0.0000036262968,1.7966806e-7,0.0000057985817,0.00010136453],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852806,0.00028750626,0.00034848007,0.00020414322,0.00037439514,0.0002574045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998811,0.00028990762,0.00029788158,0.000047004753,0.0003384089,0.00021581759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000488779,0.00014251884,0.00047629082,0.00009715808,0.00032760212,0.00015867471,0.00015914976,0.000043998734,0.000014196385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005851006,0.00011770146,0.000050172017,0.00047536942,0.0009565083,0.00049725536,0.000081756894,0.00031568622,0.0000022811957],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006966961,0.000024150993,0.0034398467,0.000011954615,0.000100212725,0.000040994746,0.96101755,0.000008251679,0.000043116663,0.034994125,0.00016209451,0.00008802747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000546842,0.00033447938,0.0034876294,0.00006048742,0.00004760595,0.0000028706988,0.9787245,0.000019676843,0.000016413627,0.0025049362,0.014104846,0.00014974445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007912451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016934963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.120458774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000112622845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014827654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4799726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121471626","doi":"10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105524","title":"South Africa's PNR regime: Privacy and data protection","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computer law & security review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Political science; State (computer science); Data Protection Act 1998; International trade; Business; Geography; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.09049200405618141,"score_gpt":0.34921999666277587,"score_spread":0.25872799260659446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121471626","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00059413986,0.89131916,0.005954158,0.017494189,0.0015041587,0.002397873,0.00008510839,0.0005474843,0.08010375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8701183,0.09019689,0.02617249,0.007192187,0.003803282,0.00012755443,0.00015943985,0.00008100824,0.0021487994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975744,0.0006869641,0.00031346493,0.0006661072,0.00041660282,0.00034245124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981816,0.000074910335,0.00014103291,0.0012207875,0.00018664803,0.0001950218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011665373,0.00016360889,0.0003969186,0.000014346826,0.00045229142,0.00026007346,0.00083451817,0.0000982778,0.00014653828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033116623,0.00015573608,0.00006910834,0.0005025936,0.000312887,0.00048539645,0.0012131447,0.0002935283,0.0001335158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012358785,0.00037910664,0.00024463993,0.007929898,0.0001760593,0.000242339,0.30490473,5.8257746e-7,0.000009927885,0.43976587,0.073099986,0.17323449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010848612,0.000016214835,0.000012053274,0.0011404585,0.000060865248,0.0000069088233,0.0000843462,0.000113416754,0.0000044669646,0.0031792277,0.99508244,0.0001911255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020718997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013703771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92198247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049835187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015172444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6350733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121834289","doi":"","title":"The Constitutional Validity of Search and Seizure Powers in SouthAfrican Criminal Procedure","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Search and seizure; Constitution; Criminal procedure; Democracy; Political science; Law; Law enforcement; State (computer science); Criminal investigation; Enforcement; Reasonable suspicion; Business; Politics; Supreme court; Computer science","score_opus":0.018675642200052786,"score_gpt":0.31704513016079783,"score_spread":0.29836948796074503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121834289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9834601,0.001144218,0.00018412847,0.002774461,0.0003252659,0.00017368507,0.000005024878,0.000014301007,0.011918769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983889,0.0004851403,0.00008266527,0.000021092388,0.00028474483,0.0000028558127,4.4507482e-7,0.000005436184,0.000728749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973978,0.0002357025,0.00022331624,0.00014378647,0.0005689982,0.001430391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930406,0.00021421503,0.00009055557,0.00010634505,0.0001657958,0.00011904729],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005041818,0.000090539674,0.00012822138,0.00007484941,0.0008018471,0.00008699124,0.00040363186,0.00010809759,0.000032784654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00080584845,0.00006587254,0.000052828855,0.0002740699,0.0022748949,0.00016059563,0.00004773508,0.0025956435,0.0000053226404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004149563,0.000033728844,0.028267788,0.0000045774254,0.000020662574,0.000003623564,0.030411225,0.0000059447407,0.00020658238,0.9396175,0.000035837867,0.0013509903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020339156,0.0006292769,0.014078457,0.00006659773,0.00011664545,0.00053746253,0.36617228,0.00012229204,0.0003177504,0.5222015,0.09306032,0.0006635504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000534488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01473084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4174161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029221852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067559537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122112788","doi":"","title":"Rethinking Volks v. Robinson: The Implcations of Applying a 'Contextualised Choice Model' to Prospective South African Domestic Partnerships Legislation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Sine qua non; General partnership; Jurisprudence; Law; Legislation; Duty; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04079357892956755,"score_gpt":0.3275927431078283,"score_spread":0.2867991641782608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122112788","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7828909,0.0017139401,0.10223127,0.01827596,0.0014473625,0.004178331,0.000024488252,0.00034376487,0.08889396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965884,0.000029508014,0.0008438367,0.0001033444,0.00076518656,0.00009236736,0.000001332233,0.000026627162,0.0015493628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965112,0.00031417323,0.0004192292,0.00028248376,0.00073843566,0.0017344768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982454,0.0003867626,0.000417954,0.00033961333,0.00042828894,0.00018197203],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004879182,0.00017305312,0.00023137963,0.00015173366,0.0014644924,0.00019422563,0.0008105948,0.00014588967,0.000026922038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022634284,0.00013529658,0.00013614415,0.00084071595,0.0003449627,0.00039504113,0.0000668452,0.002753435,0.00001906195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031707066,0.000033441695,0.0022882312,0.0000021791259,0.00005751496,5.0149396e-7,0.34093168,0.0007959547,0.00061202515,0.65335983,0.000028234186,0.0018587136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000877147,0.00022917338,0.00081769074,0.000046769488,0.00016529586,0.000026718686,0.085752964,0.0028655126,0.000100958845,0.89027154,0.018357664,0.0004885311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077291956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02274762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25517872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008356867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034654704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122459975","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1718950","title":"The Treatment Action Campaign and the Three Dimensions of Lawyering: Reflections from the Rainbow Nation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rainbow; Action (physics); Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Optics; Physics","score_opus":0.03389581036590049,"score_gpt":0.3340466596428461,"score_spread":0.3001508492769456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122459975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9464093,0.007324113,0.0011481238,0.034585718,0.0021531254,0.0007055686,0.000006646465,0.000056128218,0.0076113166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907786,0.0071322364,0.000050931296,0.000038583574,0.0007757161,0.000017648317,6.531157e-7,0.000008119245,0.0011975152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839014,0.00033948052,0.00017952634,0.000106218366,0.0003188647,0.00066580024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838793,0.0010799774,0.00018163848,0.00020591156,0.00009910805,0.000045427725],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026219373,0.00008500544,0.000097807635,0.000020852036,0.003284456,0.00014084183,0.00029015448,0.00006952929,0.000016591726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042919526,0.00003374376,0.000088945424,0.0002049027,0.0006966731,0.00012892342,0.000022893852,0.0010786104,0.0000051401826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013279117,0.00005958647,0.0012482731,3.2171002e-7,0.00024908572,3.0477742e-7,0.07460781,0.000017684659,0.0014681837,0.88264817,0.000081501516,0.03948628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007347394,0.0001531374,0.0006813463,0.000005092443,0.0001210395,0.000012846378,0.03544224,0.00008491364,0.000220169,0.6456723,0.31678623,0.00008593906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071575944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31493756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31670475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039421493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086266233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122490110","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v14i7.6","title":"Analysing the Onus Issue in Dismissals Emanating from the Enforcement of Unilateral Changes to Conditions of Employment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Appeal; Enforcement; Unfair dismissal; Collective bargaining; Compliance (psychology); Legislature; Promotion (chess); Law; Labour law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.018536158317493914,"score_gpt":0.3303078449576757,"score_spread":0.3117716866401818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122490110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9280679,0.019684989,0.000760048,0.032093383,0.0010762546,0.002135193,0.00013638646,0.00012535644,0.015920483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99597675,0.00063602196,0.00043911336,0.000593847,0.0015598624,0.00010513351,0.00002778984,0.00007388384,0.0005876212],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99214,0.0015677038,0.0014939326,0.00046160945,0.0017941727,0.0025425954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99556214,0.0012888558,0.0012677896,0.00097483705,0.0004048943,0.0005014969],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050926222,0.0005362159,0.0009558798,0.00026567763,0.0014533473,0.00021870139,0.0018771669,0.00023675659,0.0008202708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069421943,0.00036610482,0.00041934632,0.0015714827,0.0010195621,0.000686588,0.00034056,0.0015082125,0.00003083518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005271616,0.0011973664,0.03229121,0.000073399235,0.0027695484,0.00002705482,0.4848523,0.0060848636,0.010237754,0.44674706,0.0038478922,0.0113443555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030850277,0.001070269,0.0043309657,0.0008090346,0.0012774125,0.000038002396,0.124590605,0.00027996732,0.02614086,0.01974961,0.81711924,0.0015089803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032600034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05373505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81327134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018163192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006156858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122580347","doi":"","title":"Democratizing Review: Justifiability as the Animating Vision of Administrative Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Administrative law; Judicial review; Political science; Legislature; Constitution; Law; Public law; Separation of powers; Rule of law; Public administration; Constitutional law; Politics","score_opus":0.027144312422381665,"score_gpt":0.3966138173109913,"score_spread":0.36946950488860963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122580347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19925806,0.1291506,0.005858129,0.024445659,0.0008943841,0.0014863753,0.0000048249412,0.00012433388,0.6387777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994105,0.0041046944,0.00038277006,0.00037051103,0.00033483503,0.0000019921931,4.3251464e-7,0.000009674699,0.0006900916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652827,0.00052373135,0.0005394475,0.00016493724,0.000684401,0.001559186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984128,0.0005826883,0.00043371005,0.00020124245,0.00026509317,0.00010448408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017967308,0.000113864764,0.0002168823,0.000027275453,0.0011044077,0.0000605151,0.0005101639,0.000075878066,0.00008018565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001844569,0.00007829352,0.00013154905,0.00039687075,0.0005326472,0.00029650412,0.00004683141,0.0014781484,0.000024301924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029466231,0.000044141212,0.00028504562,0.000036352812,0.00003516158,0.000003604404,0.021892926,0.0000013672127,0.00022852776,0.96324974,0.00010580154,0.014087886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045581927,0.0010426647,0.00028309686,0.00091046066,0.00020053814,0.00012370416,0.108325794,0.000024031631,0.0012531121,0.67844373,0.20850967,0.0004273733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007241029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007116916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79484695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077299617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002092583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84943235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123089497","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v16i1.8","title":"Reasonable and Probable Cause in the Law of Malicious Prosecution: A Review of South African and Commonwealth Decisions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Malice; Plaintiff; Warrant; Suspect; Cause of action; Law; Probable cause; Order (exchange); Action (physics); Political science; Reasonable doubt; Officer; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.04659939553475984,"score_gpt":0.3514826152423833,"score_spread":0.30488321970762344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123089497","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022431198,0.98263025,0.00003241189,0.0013442197,0.0001549421,0.0046467716,0.000088467576,0.000067798144,0.010810835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028296314,0.9691847,0.00067916117,0.00023147352,0.00041944193,0.0005668546,0.000037567235,0.00015976152,0.00042470449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862358,0.004276636,0.003391328,0.001134273,0.0021786483,0.0027833174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911105,0.0019214501,0.0038755431,0.0016310593,0.000763654,0.000697818],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009112789,0.00124858,0.0047174147,0.00042182498,0.0013801453,0.0004087908,0.0023876133,0.0008605707,0.000102659506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001516382,0.0008856377,0.0008621345,0.002198881,0.0029627436,0.00083454384,0.00049216405,0.00412277,0.000016443208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014063805,0.00084727333,0.00010356791,0.047672726,0.0017145489,0.00013617905,0.04411669,0.0000048952443,0.0000035694713,0.73153126,0.0021123344,0.17161629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077113294,0.0006411368,0.0000024217727,0.04023822,0.0017423446,0.00047352308,0.005005453,0.0000027292444,0.0000037409623,0.006294195,0.9440736,0.0007514833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006781776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010804214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9419613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016436281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037047032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123133825","doi":"","title":"Tort Lite? - Vancouver (City) V. Ward and the Availability of Damages for Charter Infringements","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Charter; Supreme court; Law; Tort; Causation; Liability; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.024988743164697347,"score_gpt":0.28044682799899723,"score_spread":0.2554580848342999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123133825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8611337,0.0062279627,0.0043560034,0.0011098383,0.0016752352,0.0014858352,0.000013611572,0.00006825824,0.12392957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99234647,0.0007889549,0.0002607303,0.000057518235,0.00025147598,0.000014669309,2.1897137e-7,0.000009235046,0.0062707295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802876,0.00018800283,0.0002714323,0.00014630039,0.00028862664,0.0010768891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927175,0.00012853884,0.00019015723,0.00017211848,0.00016602609,0.00007141051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004399674,0.00009456781,0.0001826812,0.000044614862,0.00038691537,0.000042425738,0.00038302303,0.00006442036,0.00014451673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004105155,0.00006340993,0.00010032865,0.00012607414,0.00057709194,0.00030205015,0.000060237122,0.00051568926,0.000004235814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00086852297,0.00022284174,0.08701767,0.000036355043,0.00047054118,0.0000013756749,0.26059678,5.2539207e-7,0.000048588987,0.6329216,0.0016506026,0.016164588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029528865,0.00043083803,0.003999239,0.000026701171,0.00015449252,0.0000037826196,0.023273466,0.000012746935,0.00023908922,0.73284644,0.23578985,0.0002704419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006355825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055734967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23732333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026551154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006402844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3110142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123444135","doi":"","title":"Adjudication of Social and Economic Rights in South Africa: Beyond the Rhetoric of Illegitimacy and Excessive Complexity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Social rights; Charter; Political science; Human rights; Law; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Constitution; Social equality; Cultural rights; Right to property; State (computer science); Linguistic rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04127155449291715,"score_gpt":0.28347438003571174,"score_spread":0.2422028255427946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123444135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88002664,0.0009846715,0.00045999675,0.00090774504,0.00013533651,0.00037007628,0.00013521734,0.000016963611,0.116963364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991199,0.000040436404,0.00047001702,0.000015062747,0.00013790432,0.000019284242,0.000008398011,0.0000023409639,0.00018665052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991602,0.00010736622,0.0002681678,0.00015465301,0.00017891606,0.00013072879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992132,0.0002735172,0.00023777626,0.00007495215,0.00015705466,0.00004350696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042375788,0.00006436915,0.00017160956,0.00011093296,0.0005179337,0.000011668549,0.00013901362,0.00008111885,0.000044007433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028252313,0.00006468864,0.000033128694,0.00021947538,0.0026359695,0.00018458313,0.000034043165,0.00009689532,0.000003943408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000797438,0.000024782801,0.0076952684,0.000013138041,0.00001029677,0.0000013774401,0.096361704,0.000032109834,0.00001202239,0.8957478,0.000055064975,0.0000384705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030750665,0.000057344845,0.35128257,0.00012295031,0.00010951097,0.000043350614,0.011188481,0.0025351916,0.00020651158,0.575095,0.055677384,0.0006066328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056116184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059672154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3435873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023828243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003821228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97123396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123772538","doi":"10.11575/sppp.v9i0.42564","title":"The False Panacea of City Charters? A Political Perspective on the Case of Toronto","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Politics; Revenue; Power (physics); Public administration; Political science; Nothing; Zoning; Government (linguistics); Local government; Law; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.2960672413520862,"score_gpt":0.6043461652437381,"score_spread":0.3082789238916519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123772538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7212496,0.009344673,0.0000140402235,0.004481673,0.0007385729,0.0007394485,0.00009505202,0.000017239598,0.26331973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973305,0.0014902665,0.000025237612,0.00014639659,0.00031863834,0.000023555507,2.887334e-7,0.000020551823,0.0006445721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966791,0.00087258295,0.00063820806,0.0003237228,0.0009199767,0.00056635326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946927,0.0017394836,0.0012718937,0.0011708991,0.0008129435,0.00031210767],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003719283,0.00022016627,0.0005917475,0.00007701765,0.0023732688,0.0013196399,0.00537742,0.00012415207,0.004290855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053223087,0.00013500951,0.00027792793,0.0001905531,0.0023731086,0.0016588381,0.00094771717,0.00038606842,0.000008200571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005980461,0.00068902835,0.11775866,0.000047866655,0.00066366734,0.0003189981,0.11041784,0.0000041040616,0.0026326145,0.7395542,0.019671539,0.0076433825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017190385,0.0001617913,0.4337446,0.0009551274,0.0005113713,0.00005031365,0.2237321,0.00007970327,0.019005243,0.22672594,0.09198321,0.0013315813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20194584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02049887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5128283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004693207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030407496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123870019","doi":"","title":"Precedent, Principle and Pragmatism: Justice Wilson and the Expansion of Canadian Tort Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Political science; Delict; Common law; Sociology; Public law; Private law; Black letter law; Liability","score_opus":0.028227883254181844,"score_gpt":0.2971254760630718,"score_spread":0.26889759280889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123870019","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36532092,0.000699188,0.000023506811,0.0018001914,0.0001556486,0.0003461425,0.0000045391093,0.000025881107,0.631624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932868,0.0003784167,0.00089615997,0.00026341734,0.00006635625,0.00000712806,5.193727e-7,0.0000043905698,0.0050968505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924165,0.00011705484,0.00012050748,0.00011915118,0.00021822209,0.00018343893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944323,0.00016533767,0.00004504023,0.0001260494,0.00005319904,0.00016711924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043927893,0.000055813343,0.00010888593,0.00004333893,0.0006122142,0.000028926524,0.00012200523,0.000057823847,0.00008582774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024122874,0.00003749012,0.000013650806,0.00019314408,0.0009050087,0.00016144314,0.000045073524,0.00006211284,0.000005456798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014282601,0.0000070392384,0.0035521253,0.000018227274,0.000008481661,0.000004829198,0.24506037,0.0000016173709,0.000018882081,0.74960685,0.0013582306,0.0003490501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008047432,0.00004193342,0.008130985,0.000028107097,0.000067217625,0.000008610181,0.016110184,0.00011673721,0.00027076527,0.0015162745,0.97272575,0.00017870257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6434384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70378536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97136754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033147724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001606924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47087187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124294062","doi":"","title":"How Could Human Rights Law Be Used by the Courts to Assist Victims of Domestic Violence? A Comparative Study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Domestic violence; Law; Political science; International human rights law; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.0235203374695695,"score_gpt":0.35613866868244304,"score_spread":0.33261833121287354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124294062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98534995,0.000342345,0.00024994247,0.0034124553,0.00047404342,0.00068837503,0.000010564261,0.000039593746,0.009432741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99738324,0.00000969853,0.00003618192,0.00008565411,0.0003948534,0.000023195122,0.0000013898381,0.000014853269,0.0020509283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960067,0.0005238638,0.00033561853,0.00027250563,0.0011330956,0.0017281709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985585,0.00027720182,0.00032372246,0.0003360205,0.00027354452,0.00023099821],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003209088,0.00020822178,0.00037037997,0.00006904416,0.0022017679,0.00033966583,0.001122862,0.00011808225,0.000065698754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010574166,0.00013924153,0.000111883994,0.00037754682,0.00076250173,0.00028928736,0.00006936806,0.0025880164,0.0000166374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005112,0.0006247406,0.0030566456,0.0000020242296,0.00027183036,0.000009486197,0.16611077,0.000006618771,0.0021597482,0.8268399,0.00066570914,0.00020140779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029648617,0.0034525942,0.0011179448,0.00007902972,0.0003932621,0.00007390316,0.21464968,0.000020875226,0.001337334,0.53052497,0.24442182,0.00096372224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055774976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17807087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29631492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005197968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000892055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124915855","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2012/v15i3a2506","title":"The Methodology Used to Interpret Customary Land Tenure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Customary land; Law; Land tenure; Adjudication; Jurisdiction; Common law; Statutory law; Indigenous; Political science; Statutory interpretation; Legislation; Land law; Geography","score_opus":0.048583883940547204,"score_gpt":0.3792018602225298,"score_spread":0.3306179762819826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124915855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35609108,0.056862205,0.014324339,0.20911907,0.015137454,0.006286504,0.00013231166,0.0021948346,0.3398522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98353463,0.0018655637,0.0021567626,0.00081600435,0.0038441902,0.00017788108,0.000007809636,0.0002063595,0.0073908195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98717,0.002962715,0.0014221274,0.001218537,0.0021346442,0.005092023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909256,0.0023691866,0.0011814968,0.0031411217,0.00080002967,0.0015825459],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010518268,0.0009702046,0.0012809559,0.00026011156,0.017358592,0.0037998664,0.005925577,0.00073946593,0.00028153253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067486474,0.00074311986,0.0008163023,0.00053976785,0.0028488163,0.0016777673,0.0010298967,0.00417411,0.0005082087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002683494,0.0005419039,0.01100763,0.00005759969,0.0032012325,0.00076432107,0.12929493,0.0002681072,0.002782351,0.7251333,0.03185318,0.09241197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016022132,0.0007020491,0.00037116723,0.00010407905,0.00025397688,0.0002183852,0.006115129,0.000032839063,0.001025025,0.035338487,0.95328665,0.0009499781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064988583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07652024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9214335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027353729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021307413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125518127","doi":"","title":"Restorative Justice and the Regulatory State in South African Townships","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Context (archaeology); Corporate governance; State (computer science); Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Criminology; Public administration; Cape; Law; Sociology; Geography; Business","score_opus":0.021985107955222193,"score_gpt":0.27237502857519796,"score_spread":0.2503899206199758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125518127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7701537,0.05647153,0.0009217627,0.01743642,0.0008684308,0.0008355165,0.000007139646,0.000119597666,0.15318587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881819,0.0020740847,0.000040567607,0.00012128571,0.00034732991,0.000006326216,1.223794e-7,0.000012664707,0.009215709],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964265,0.00094409083,0.00025447443,0.00018112003,0.00047258657,0.001721219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991865,0.00028517708,0.00017670613,0.00015785058,0.000075582044,0.00011815866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005179765,0.00011828428,0.0001819435,0.00009313035,0.0007614513,0.00014481929,0.0003843179,0.0000664205,0.000059677164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007359841,0.00008317654,0.00005159937,0.0004350287,0.00083523395,0.00027058698,0.00004611666,0.0018920706,0.00003460807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094704235,0.000021750197,0.0009799899,0.000002700127,0.000032443746,0.000008283981,0.5722173,0.000021828753,0.0000021593073,0.42287967,0.00016830355,0.0035708533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025142962,0.00016459354,0.00086935767,0.000027631533,0.00011625483,0.000029135232,0.32341248,0.00017359774,0.0000041485073,0.6272781,0.045075636,0.0003348164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058852957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008102264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24880484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009742811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070679915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82202107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125786627","doi":"10.5430/ijba.v3n4p54","title":"An Examination of the Tenancy Agreement as a Shield in Property Management in Nigeria","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Business Administration","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Leasehold estate; Renting; Business; Landlord; Finance; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.027072426098315738,"score_gpt":0.33730931509313916,"score_spread":0.31023688899482343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125786627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9701869,0.00007685124,0.00027948295,0.0026056038,0.0014455593,0.00024484497,0.0000019684826,0.0000036275223,0.025155144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988167,0.00004550139,0.00039389532,0.000059982274,0.0003290052,0.000007944163,0.000002495071,0.000004384103,0.00034007823],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824625,0.0002073839,0.0004955415,0.000074281845,0.000841551,0.00013496989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989722,0.000034061843,0.00042058027,0.000095486845,0.00043293013,0.00004474234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013121031,0.0000662301,0.00010432455,0.00019573177,0.000041255487,0.00005819598,0.0004719924,0.00005400136,0.000104410225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027329993,0.00004274535,0.000035016532,0.00038583955,0.00008408068,0.0009586559,0.000032876003,0.0001050758,0.0000039651004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062792376,0.004257741,0.5362174,0.000076764125,0.00013611499,0.00014914158,0.22963372,0.00070969184,0.0029094624,0.07849725,0.00014018982,0.14664464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007355276,0.00008909702,0.98058784,0.00025408054,0.0000128855145,0.000011233581,0.008500732,0.000048258997,0.0011999615,0.0011555038,0.0072929375,0.000111918554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020455968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001044876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44437048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002516665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019054287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17431048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125837551","doi":"","title":"Judicial Discretion in Derivative Actions Under the Companies Act of 2008","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Discretion; Law; Legislature; Judicial discretion; Jurisprudence; Action (physics); Balance (ability); Judicial review; Judicial interpretation; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.026025508154103944,"score_gpt":0.26571524396244245,"score_spread":0.2396897358083385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125837551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89480627,0.00014042442,0.0038719946,0.0022317872,0.0012604834,0.00040625717,0.000011453709,0.000037870042,0.097233474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977467,0.000019420604,0.00060876476,0.000009169129,0.00016715103,0.000001257407,0.000002807221,0.0000028705938,0.0014418822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989194,0.00019052133,0.00012359674,0.00014774731,0.00046701316,0.00015169548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991649,0.00018395239,0.00017881523,0.00015176968,0.0002607808,0.000059827787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001941883,0.00007448322,0.00014743632,0.000074876254,0.0008938778,0.000020855789,0.00032650452,0.00010600188,0.000168796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009184122,0.00007486293,0.000075420445,0.000380613,0.0018274629,0.0006839181,0.000059206635,0.0001695106,0.000017712517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016706678,0.00032830218,0.027472159,0.000033629367,0.00016612459,0.000017666816,0.25315085,0.010568646,0.005483915,0.6993544,0.0029342435,0.00032298852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014285608,0.00017837502,0.5052498,0.00028416485,0.00013743233,0.000006678805,0.34938452,0.0013474647,0.0016388077,0.013595596,0.12613276,0.0006158284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025516702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028781095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6857588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033841733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049074524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98097247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130651333","doi":"","title":"Behind the blackboard : reviewing educators' experiences of school violence in South Africa","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Criminologica","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pedagogy; Blackboard (design pattern); Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.140825339625572,"score_gpt":0.37243758653959175,"score_spread":0.23161224691401974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130651333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9157842,0.0028928982,0.0000023768416,0.0018344711,0.0005728201,0.00036216728,0.000002363062,0.000044251647,0.07850447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981684,0.0005076964,0.0003731433,0.00012373945,0.00023293075,0.00010265034,3.2190968e-7,0.000008253698,0.00048283054],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978319,0.00034634076,0.0003878607,0.00038743147,0.00048007464,0.0005663858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979812,0.00027656875,0.0004539089,0.0010506362,0.00010022623,0.00013748088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011602273,0.00016958117,0.0003337793,0.00006737903,0.0012397687,0.00023522726,0.0027030038,0.00016940547,0.000555513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070139635,0.00011032907,0.00010953776,0.00013304618,0.0021286805,0.00044547426,0.00040666052,0.00035749053,0.00008762318],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011438047,0.00005364593,0.017061532,0.00001409607,0.0000074869617,0.0000071843383,0.97635764,3.4480416e-7,0.000079334,0.0021821116,0.0005163874,0.0037087929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002631963,0.00012079989,0.03980273,0.00042780762,0.000054877626,8.085176e-7,0.78226864,0.000004423512,0.000734379,0.0047759525,0.17108634,0.00046005764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008869918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011971877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19408901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000780874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002494775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95354235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131509491","doi":"","title":"A LITTLE LESS TALK AND A LOT MORE ACTION: HOW CAN LAW ENFORCEMENT ENHANCE THE RECRUITMENT OF WOMEN?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Calhoun: The Naval Postgraduate School Institutional Archive (Naval Postgraduate School)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Law enforcement; Action (physics); Law; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06636261195002008,"score_gpt":0.3433367560650181,"score_spread":0.27697414411499804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131509491","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7540746,0.0097119585,0.00038855086,0.09644509,0.010186763,0.015245459,0.0041835993,0.0008101588,0.10895388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97811353,0.0022521552,0.00039375736,0.002190224,0.002365877,0.00121184,0.0015951602,0.00014513185,0.011732324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98987824,0.0015975221,0.0014390274,0.001678851,0.0035140025,0.0018923852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938844,0.000767425,0.0013352303,0.0012338739,0.001097237,0.0016818295],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022132718,0.0013356266,0.0013903906,0.00030602727,0.0041245315,0.0009570739,0.002523059,0.0005341342,0.00015643962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027121215,0.0009589423,0.00070800877,0.0012782377,0.004597109,0.000837076,0.00057664094,0.0033055055,0.00021707955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005086408,0.00070038124,0.00039163724,0.0012671101,0.0027004168,0.00039635348,0.20326127,0.00047695622,0.006037323,0.75483924,0.009765915,0.015076973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024326516,0.0010502181,0.0027330953,0.0013550273,0.000899484,0.00009535654,0.07936852,0.00029104066,0.005260901,0.04136111,0.8626853,0.0024672837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023279453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011983702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8529194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023163918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004908216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132853333","doi":"10.47348/sacj/v33/i3a5","title":"Revising spousal testimonial privilege and marital communications privilege in South African criminal procedure: Is abolition or extension the answer? Part 2","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Privilege (computing); Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Sociology; Criminology; History; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.07818039969400453,"score_gpt":0.33598407691269494,"score_spread":0.2578036772186904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132853333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9423029,0.005987633,0.0017395478,0.034193765,0.001349486,0.0017283326,0.0002878586,0.00018250858,0.012227991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898646,0.00016734048,0.00637348,0.0014316256,0.0020020858,0.000014426812,0.0000039318065,0.00004920023,0.00009329874],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99520147,0.0009723164,0.0011846487,0.00050654483,0.0013053109,0.0008296994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958844,0.0009645849,0.0010805154,0.0005940392,0.00073663174,0.0007398311],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021587585,0.00038974718,0.000666678,0.00022945105,0.0011312118,0.00039011627,0.0015086108,0.0001922437,0.000116424126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066568167,0.00029171168,0.00018518778,0.0011991422,0.0017019478,0.0007196247,0.00039367046,0.0013274928,0.000024896799],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011085125,0.00016941405,0.0028196024,0.00039252487,0.000041377214,0.00025388904,0.98866063,0.000026989197,0.00008947369,0.0034700716,0.0006724394,0.0022950724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015208313,0.0012022378,0.007609649,0.00079087773,0.003080716,0.0001908257,0.92231333,0.0008801224,0.000040194813,0.00047351068,0.061145656,0.00075202517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012080843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010658835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06634728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021961128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010937665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133168691","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1409","title":"A Pipeline Story: The Evolving Autonomy of Canadian Municipalities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Legislature; Statutory law; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Political science; Autonomy; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Law; Business; Geography","score_opus":0.04232552655796398,"score_gpt":0.33370421449100807,"score_spread":0.2913786879330441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133168691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09529504,0.0033923069,0.000006024336,0.0999894,0.00047381182,0.00007876069,0.000030372757,0.000008955781,0.80072534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99050003,0.0000814075,0.000111928035,0.0016904221,0.0025169495,4.8320305e-7,3.2941176e-7,0.0000055797823,0.0050928406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988779,0.0003536097,0.00022663639,0.000048969338,0.00026140438,0.00023150734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910873,0.0001350945,0.00019466739,0.00006756548,0.00034888976,0.00014504253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009268043,0.000056461566,0.00019619311,0.0001211494,0.00085327995,0.00008249062,0.00020927706,0.0000764282,0.00007342903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043290106,0.000044039072,0.00010000868,0.0003121023,0.00062458473,0.00016740721,0.00003402395,0.00023518226,0.0000013027548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021875112,0.0000069272824,0.00008840779,0.000004961562,0.000019751158,0.000008821717,0.42924076,6.4784484e-7,0.000008143664,0.5676472,0.0025407453,0.0004314263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013117901,0.00001260543,0.000324513,0.000013900625,0.000023817163,0.0000030337994,0.05557706,0.000002757054,0.0000205493,0.005710937,0.9381293,0.00005031344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62018824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43797153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9355886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002347612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035000509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6562826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135940413","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2020/v23i0a8150","title":"State Use Provisions for Patent Law, and Expropriations: Some Comparative Law Guidelines for South Africa during the Covid-19 Crisis and Beyond","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Remuneration; Government (linguistics); TRIPS Agreement; State (computer science); TRIPS architecture; Intellectual property; Patent Act; Business; Patent infringement; Political science; Patent law; Engineering","score_opus":0.13350417912541174,"score_gpt":0.3603051737450357,"score_spread":0.22680099461962394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135940413","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31332684,0.11379678,0.05668029,0.47874868,0.0018512565,0.025703838,0.003397745,0.0022917413,0.004202841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97880715,0.0015901818,0.006751205,0.009583154,0.0016485713,0.0008563902,0.000035949608,0.00015402393,0.00057334686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99235916,0.0008636491,0.0015748426,0.0012748863,0.0012099117,0.0027175737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933969,0.0017099379,0.0011054752,0.000653073,0.0014045349,0.0017300958],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002771858,0.0008639903,0.0011727567,0.00013826764,0.0073872865,0.0018633364,0.00109029,0.000340965,0.00003445095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022939849,0.0006742963,0.0005054425,0.00057228864,0.0017683114,0.0021386303,0.00036675105,0.0014245453,0.000009315444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015730021,0.0001815731,0.00016471064,0.00023498274,0.0010810057,0.000019397869,0.25543872,0.0011756619,0.00079212704,0.73057467,0.008495977,0.00026817055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049212626,0.0011795817,0.000009462472,0.00004186036,0.0005461453,0.000044978635,0.04796996,0.0008054093,0.00080764387,0.09405118,0.84859043,0.0010321067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017850765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059499196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84009445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013365238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001319745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137763280","doi":"","title":"The Universality of the Human Condition: Theorizing Transportation Inequality Claims by Persons with Disabilities in Canada, 1976 – 2016","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Sociology; Doctrine; Disability studies; Human rights; Inequality; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.009692718577204665,"score_gpt":0.27246921987263095,"score_spread":0.2627765012954263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137763280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99063826,0.0004747708,0.00012711115,0.0027570736,0.00015392413,0.00015220846,0.000038562186,0.000007743095,0.0056503383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983632,0.00008616614,0.0000036122947,0.000033442124,0.00014348216,0.0000027700592,0.0000024361389,0.0000063455827,0.0013585188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768764,0.00054992747,0.0002390838,0.000115117924,0.00050050265,0.000907736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923706,0.00022765734,0.00020395209,0.0001604243,0.000121521734,0.000049403086],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022575597,0.00008421837,0.00011607352,0.000014970661,0.0013152661,0.00003490058,0.00044062507,0.000040329236,0.000054505042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000823676,0.000047977926,0.000047237772,0.0002569124,0.0011553576,0.00019126106,0.000007892065,0.0007071605,7.8295824e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050430415,0.000026733513,0.13517325,0.000004223174,0.00005543075,4.943397e-7,0.09430597,0.00000503254,0.00007378021,0.7693643,0.0004971112,0.00044325774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068259524,0.00020787113,0.022280805,0.000061207065,0.000049529877,0.0000025836296,0.7077965,0.0000043851087,0.00022153198,0.24028444,0.028189676,0.00021883972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79031736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6134906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025590789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007812888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139205488","doi":"10.21991/cf29411","title":"Toronto's 2018 Municipal Election, Rights of Democratic Participation, and Section 2(b) of the Charter","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Public administration; Political science; Democracy; Government (linguistics); Representation (politics); Local government; General election; Section (typography); Law; Business; Politics; Advertising","score_opus":0.015306788955929419,"score_gpt":0.2880664323400087,"score_spread":0.2727596433840793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139205488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39631814,0.009169175,0.028375434,0.010374902,0.0133106075,0.0019491578,0.00041195285,0.00025999587,0.5398306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99806696,0.00006442173,0.000452857,0.00019435566,0.00020341664,0.00003822107,0.00001710362,0.0000048914526,0.0009577847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997832,0.00025661377,0.0005935062,0.00031477984,0.00057816145,0.0004249113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998273,0.00018687172,0.00029627563,0.00035355857,0.0007491962,0.00014110014],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037971928,0.00017448826,0.00028835202,0.000055632394,0.0017118086,0.000043927204,0.00023852513,0.00019318335,0.00037403224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075858366,0.00014635125,0.0001555139,0.00046502324,0.0071633244,0.00067850796,0.00013335691,0.00016557805,0.000009553372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021401751,0.00011318643,0.02127544,0.000019663239,0.00006868382,0.0000019920933,0.0036646177,0.00008766594,0.0007283453,0.9718803,0.0020116032,0.00012709547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002923275,0.00018309016,0.01342412,0.0005702769,0.0005001623,0.00011556856,0.017832683,0.0009697668,0.025263691,0.12236115,0.81486803,0.0009881548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002948232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022613212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84951913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002684361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00134897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3141701539","doi":"10.1017/9781108283618","title":"Remedies for Human Rights Violations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Damages; Political science; Jurisprudence; Harm; Law; International human rights law; Discretion; Interim; Proportionality (law); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03923995706868449,"score_gpt":0.2819543061799168,"score_spread":0.2427143491112323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3141701539","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000039229057,0.00026936518,0.00036449754,0.000036502406,0.00065563316,0.00073986396,0.00039900973,0.00022184459,0.99727404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020093336,0.000012054407,0.0003491883,0.000027996757,0.0010552523,0.000004336185,0.00022618061,0.000029946872,0.99628574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982984,0.00016679088,0.00018554916,0.00050225644,0.00042473033,0.00042227155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831796,0.0002674135,0.0002113113,0.00047108784,0.00051105075,0.00022117828],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002203621,0.00025353566,0.00039194216,0.00014101043,0.0023714106,0.00011885977,0.0007365215,0.0005211637,0.000014807041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006977223,0.0003149013,0.00029639233,0.00002782104,0.00076788245,0.00012972984,0.00025855782,0.00037008876,0.000011445762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008188488,0.000007832291,0.0000012695015,0.000035614557,0.000070963084,0.000046668378,0.003618257,2.650868e-7,0.000005457044,0.7281885,0.26797822,0.0000387487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003019731,0.000021463871,0.0000023937828,0.00012787378,0.00023182978,3.382254e-7,0.00037962146,0.0000026366486,0.000057182755,0.0002684941,0.9982475,0.0003586714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018749118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006091152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7302693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007495973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005868519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3141998102","doi":"10.29173/mlj1020","title":"Section 24(2) of the Charter; Exploring the Role of Police Conduct in the Grant Analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Charter; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.0718746993278118,"score_gpt":0.3069453242783958,"score_spread":0.235070624950584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3141998102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96687376,0.0001347096,0.000012998422,0.00090864324,0.0008901084,0.00011895859,0.000003112729,0.000005974633,0.031051734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99840325,0.000020352702,0.000022391558,0.00011936817,0.0014039995,0.0000056781555,1.2334746e-7,0.0000048599336,0.000019985991],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981064,0.0007045447,0.00028758054,0.00008615104,0.00059603126,0.00021927615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991299,0.00014743659,0.0002565396,0.000269389,0.00016343802,0.000033305372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018082772,0.000071314236,0.00015132982,0.00007319753,0.0009509667,0.00009561908,0.00081396254,0.000037734713,0.00007062605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007922324,0.000033847467,0.00017140205,0.0010557534,0.00070121133,0.00023394711,0.00005675217,0.00031886267,0.000005790413],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033460627,0.000100716396,0.056215446,0.0000053000845,0.00026666492,0.0000020719635,0.8982275,0.00005533456,0.0016793606,0.038430065,0.00018090903,0.0048031714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026215697,0.000102902646,0.04132025,0.000040649466,0.0003636638,0.000012501962,0.7992525,0.00008036784,0.0047246055,0.007168214,0.14653768,0.00013451223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13853279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4664954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3279626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006607877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003687696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8672038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3143269603","doi":"10.5539/ass.v17n4p35","title":"The Legitimacy of the Public-Sector Employee’s Strike in the Jordanian Legislation: A Study Case","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislator; Public sector; Legislation; Legitimacy; Private sector; Sovereignty; Law; State (computer science); Public administration; Political science; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.04109033316577105,"score_gpt":0.3467466323789308,"score_spread":0.30565629921315973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3143269603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34106085,0.00016524845,0.000014485563,0.033091966,0.0011276002,0.0010447332,0.000012988872,0.000039771854,0.62344235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99858105,0.0000034852483,0.00003677234,0.00023129146,0.00045492884,0.000041633917,2.3958444e-7,0.000007136794,0.00064345496],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956698,0.0013012728,0.00032723745,0.00035447165,0.0017269229,0.0006203418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984079,0.00040006737,0.00018517669,0.00054219854,0.00037444106,0.00009021274],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045365663,0.000116733514,0.00015243428,0.000049308303,0.0054193153,0.0008675627,0.0021201358,0.000061024635,0.000071737006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024613666,0.000065755215,0.00010445946,0.0049571856,0.0035682342,0.00062365545,0.00032403631,0.0003508963,0.000011631469],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004308007,0.00018748855,0.05670658,0.000001684225,0.000009673052,0.00022239356,0.73675364,2.345473e-7,0.000033894437,0.18522385,0.00068685855,0.020169398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037398908,0.00005119422,0.17434584,0.000008250202,0.000019904974,0.000028718756,0.63887256,0.00000402218,0.000038162405,0.0048226165,0.18123789,0.00019682499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00269672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045272775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6575202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002353075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018045893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W314685758","doi":"","title":"Anti-Spam: A Comparative Appraisal of Canadian, European Union, and South African Regulatory Regimes: Lex Informatica Conference, 21st-23rd May 2008 Pretoria, South Africa","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of information, law and technology","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Forum spam; Spamming; Spambot; Legislature; The Internet; Jurisdiction; European union; Cyberspace; Political science; Business; Advertising; Law; Computer science; International trade; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.020198345302985768,"score_gpt":0.26684578276076093,"score_spread":0.24664743745777518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W314685758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17946468,0.0008460475,0.00075096084,0.005543989,0.00043947552,0.0005086309,0.000080132806,0.00013390416,0.8122322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99780494,0.00009407968,0.0017277694,0.00013001787,0.0000904873,0.0000015462721,0.000004965981,0.0000056597496,0.00014053776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787986,0.00019275268,0.0009888065,0.00010098815,0.00043535387,0.00040222783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997166,0.00007930584,0.0011588671,0.00023800948,0.0010379129,0.00031992092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013640245,0.00019124319,0.00051473937,0.0012520371,0.00044519315,0.00014628078,0.00047010178,0.00024819764,0.00002831404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040183752,0.00016486993,0.000052155974,0.001202578,0.0013913029,0.001558526,0.00006094807,0.0003989795,0.000012784426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021949223,0.000021004344,0.0023244421,0.000026070069,0.0000596523,0.0000051267803,0.36543328,0.000010436133,0.000009959609,0.62706035,0.0037290002,0.0012987215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008943756,0.00044014218,0.0030432788,0.00010656637,0.000060162343,0.000038329523,0.11207518,0.000046666668,0.00011411291,0.0053187073,0.877576,0.00028645401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011955108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012130485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.873847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007330589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005798798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67232007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3148539756","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199692552.001.0001","title":"The Negligence Liability of Public Authorities, Second Edition","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Variety (cybernetics); Scope (computer science); Political science; Reputation; Legal liability; Law; Tort; Business","score_opus":0.039539422012797455,"score_gpt":0.3091166999051831,"score_spread":0.2695772778923856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3148539756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000016091453,0.001956355,0.00006991587,0.00091278047,0.0034633793,0.00053580955,0.00010532114,0.000091482696,0.9928489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014703745,0.00019811952,0.00012112951,0.000062065184,0.0015061677,0.000018193772,0.000025474652,0.000017755463,0.98334736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753135,0.00036377282,0.00041796657,0.00033390164,0.00092765136,0.0004253734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971656,0.0012408447,0.00031587656,0.0006815472,0.00046603323,0.0001300573],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024713764,0.00017227248,0.00029869826,0.000050711787,0.00056016934,0.00020565116,0.0010601685,0.000510166,0.005750675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011680496,0.00012634571,0.0001636607,0.00015583665,0.0015782362,0.0003048117,0.00016331545,0.00045746577,0.00040361463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020089585,0.000011705153,0.000047696463,0.000051600993,0.000018711988,3.794067e-7,0.011617057,7.647385e-8,4.7737853e-7,0.7325684,0.25201657,0.0036653224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030337384,0.000024905763,0.000019359073,0.000025134048,0.000011041082,6.012722e-8,0.0017164081,0.000001989665,0.000007947916,0.06294843,0.9350726,0.00014178806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046739128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003170619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.683056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005163613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027154714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3150226060","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1405","title":"The Better Local Government Act versus Municipal Democracy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Local government; Democracy; Public administration; Political science; Business; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.029564945102533626,"score_gpt":0.35098515828569643,"score_spread":0.32142021318316283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3150226060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31043962,0.0016920982,0.00005399849,0.17204903,0.0018447025,0.0000947366,0.000013854975,0.000017760616,0.5137942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916183,0.0002297422,0.00008257002,0.0022055665,0.0046717613,5.2858826e-7,1.7078396e-7,0.0000072694943,0.0011840914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983953,0.0002917396,0.00024541636,0.000070775255,0.0007010343,0.00029572783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919033,0.00030299052,0.00018421198,0.00007642797,0.000120610974,0.00012540404],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006171646,0.00007427415,0.000161899,0.000010179007,0.0015404301,0.00020329282,0.00023992968,0.00009343757,0.000036709534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027910902,0.00005398076,0.00013321092,0.00011886912,0.00074109767,0.00019023032,0.00009136632,0.00028486075,0.0000073245383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014778573,0.00004886984,0.00017343402,0.0000042086335,0.00012081633,0.00007131025,0.17063099,0.0000011566625,0.000028725446,0.79999727,0.0028447655,0.025930682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006086026,0.00005238534,0.0003868482,0.0000072640078,0.00003576911,0.0000038149756,0.016888212,0.000002519146,0.000052146155,0.0099418415,0.971944,0.000076639706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019515199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018522762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96909916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003023226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000365052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151230307","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1410","title":"With Great(er) Power Comes Great(er) Responsibility: Indigenous Rights and Municipal Autonomy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Constitution; Indigenous rights; Autonomy; Political science; Jurisprudence; Legislature; Democracy; Public administration; Law; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Local government; Empowerment; Sociology; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.02316959477108585,"score_gpt":0.3310868733339203,"score_spread":0.30791727856283446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3151230307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8994759,0.0009375614,0.0000070915216,0.004786564,0.00015909168,0.00012663032,0.000018162236,0.000023429422,0.09446558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99437433,0.000039548257,0.00045349932,0.0011171204,0.0012979655,0.0000015896734,0.0000010145436,0.000014318843,0.00270059],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979282,0.000527924,0.00038644182,0.0001988348,0.0005167627,0.0004418062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873734,0.00019862555,0.0002898589,0.00014502289,0.00033128224,0.00029790075],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008195391,0.00016985211,0.0004749207,0.00011130344,0.0013737442,0.00027519438,0.00021577936,0.00020150801,0.00008597269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014033467,0.00013282937,0.00011236058,0.00030916807,0.0010456778,0.0004043577,0.000094299256,0.00038665102,0.0000041614076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019337326,0.00008399283,0.0029473528,0.000014650611,0.0001557669,0.00033802135,0.7792448,5.1334035e-7,0.0000150913565,0.2158967,0.00019434716,0.0009153903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018471079,0.0004933596,0.009380204,0.00006206529,0.00016426902,0.00014627687,0.017784957,0.0000013154046,0.00008567219,0.047493793,0.9221167,0.00042426446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0140979085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004913801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9219224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026781636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015159046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155307953","doi":"10.29173/mlj1016","title":"In the Aftermath of R v Pham: A Comment on Certainty of Removal and Mitigation of Sentences","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ontario Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Philosophy; Linguistics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.024547187069918663,"score_gpt":0.3142020781336466,"score_spread":0.28965489106372794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155307953","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9698176,0.00009003749,0.0000109692955,0.0048425356,0.00020064479,0.00009967825,0.000004286717,0.0000019382398,0.024932336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987157,0.00002263507,0.00030831192,0.00072022405,0.0002241392,9.2083803e-7,1.6883101e-7,0.0000022187446,0.000005689113],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988106,0.0003254778,0.00026524073,0.000055991008,0.00042894186,0.00011378775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993749,0.00013845782,0.00024263361,0.000083769206,0.00012865345,0.000031546326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011515338,0.000047429276,0.00012349279,0.00003242122,0.00016928696,0.00002498835,0.00021827527,0.00004279304,0.000032482498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008789163,0.00003176253,0.000034566692,0.00012435448,0.00078393513,0.00010105034,0.000024262496,0.00014044435,0.0000013900159],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034513738,0.00047126578,0.029420715,0.000084803134,0.000070199545,0.00007451972,0.667757,0.000008332814,0.001757095,0.2858984,0.004529917,0.0095826695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019505757,0.0015172771,0.018227264,0.00067377754,0.00008198529,0.00009345073,0.6385669,0.00012289395,0.012502289,0.056800067,0.26918277,0.0002807006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012994387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02139156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26465288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032813798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024798646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157906344","doi":"10.25159/2522-3062/5307","title":"The Canadian Courts’ Approach to the ‘Duty to Consult’ Indigenous Peoples: A Comparative Overview","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Duty; Law; Supreme court; Obligation; Political science; Convention; State (computer science); Notice; Ceremony; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.10975294987985741,"score_gpt":0.35698417075444955,"score_spread":0.24723122087459215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157906344","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05972086,0.020413835,0.0007906221,0.02154602,0.0013600489,0.0008819775,0.0004779933,0.00002161522,0.894787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99324346,0.00012853739,0.0006815271,0.0010674814,0.00046904376,0.000018243367,0.0000040904756,0.000008474322,0.0043791668],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774855,0.00050357607,0.00043684966,0.0002042116,0.0007345766,0.00037223144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996935,0.0006303221,0.00025902316,0.00018281772,0.0014998242,0.0004929861],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010566775,0.00016483522,0.00032924121,0.00007845716,0.0021986703,0.00062690745,0.0009213401,0.000060438724,0.000113525806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030576286,0.00010016354,0.00011199109,0.00038599342,0.00049198535,0.00015051271,0.00012279293,0.00035331456,0.0002168446],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005755812,0.000069006106,0.00037498865,0.0000023276855,0.00021088823,0.000011377419,0.8090068,0.00015566286,0.000008654619,0.18231705,0.0075630685,0.00022261037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018757646,0.00005601542,0.00033025097,0.0000417445,0.000024837318,0.000017161869,0.17378856,0.000029370418,0.00002094559,0.001519794,0.8238608,0.00012290999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021660917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44334203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9335226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038363392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010448656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159161535","doi":"","title":"Violence conjugale et droit de la famille : la méconnue ordonnance de protection (Domestic Violence and Family Law: The Overlooked Protection Order)","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Political science; Law; Humanities; Legislature; Self defense; Poison control; Sociology; Suicide prevention; Art; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.011829912185277243,"score_gpt":0.2712061632539304,"score_spread":0.25937625106865314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159161535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7323105,0.09298001,0.14272174,0.019516569,0.00089227164,0.0021274898,0.000021094282,0.0002350472,0.009195292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9364992,0.06034033,0.00029590284,0.0012113147,0.00077124697,0.00010152856,5.5481155e-7,0.00004797851,0.0007319877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930799,0.002930579,0.00044291804,0.00050191197,0.00058906915,0.0024556012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984375,0.00039978707,0.00042147035,0.00021308039,0.00021470296,0.0003134289],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060224603,0.00034132643,0.0003348348,0.00005074045,0.0013396502,0.0004348403,0.00063660654,0.0004070483,0.000025992766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014928277,0.0003090125,0.00012790281,0.0008837153,0.0017376397,0.0006334009,0.000119538694,0.0048919637,0.00004994231],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030337268,0.00015941725,0.000879569,0.00011201341,0.00017668781,0.00005767459,0.041647088,0.00068141497,0.0046671527,0.81869143,0.00003309421,0.13259111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018114223,0.001512853,0.0014987568,0.001919404,0.00023169685,0.0012867872,0.017611718,0.008881317,0.00034304528,0.88157684,0.08249615,0.000830012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008721519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015352014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20418867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018825689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049729203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163784926","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190075774.003.0010","title":"The Republic of South Africa","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Political science; Law; Democracy; Bill of rights; Constitutional court; Judicial review; German; Power (physics); Constitutional review; History; Politics","score_opus":0.04414709120188668,"score_gpt":0.28768565929733414,"score_spread":0.24353856809544747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163784926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000016061339,0.00566636,0.000016549646,0.0011146184,0.0005846117,0.00017033429,0.000016701717,0.0000779879,0.99235123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031120384,0.00022455696,0.00025430764,0.000052656516,0.00045651186,0.0000048898855,0.0000036832676,0.000027305447,0.9678557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815625,0.000071306706,0.00034107914,0.00028639805,0.00083317125,0.00031178814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982118,0.00038902793,0.00027440913,0.0006410957,0.00036765865,0.00011602047],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007397029,0.000163409,0.0002851148,0.00004975361,0.00047866465,0.00015334207,0.0007337054,0.0003402145,0.005101041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061628775,0.000111890105,0.00022950873,0.000089962865,0.00091465365,0.00006110853,0.00021236975,0.00032049534,0.00024764313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019768918,0.0000030956257,0.0000035676346,0.0000045528045,0.00003877642,0.000005429548,0.055427946,6.883402e-8,3.1262962e-7,0.9305889,0.012237356,0.001688005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003427927,0.000010711416,0.0000011542787,0.000026106884,0.000027348517,1.1367894e-7,0.0035391876,3.5226438e-7,0.0000040796804,0.022765193,0.97345567,0.00013580856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013962048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036697194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9612183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081871694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005236588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165357967","doi":"","title":"Misconduct relating to fraud and corruption in the public service","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Language change; Corporate governance; Abuse of power; Good governance; Political science; Independence (probability theory); Democracy; Power (physics); Law; Public administration; Business; Politics; Finance","score_opus":0.05881110559674418,"score_gpt":0.329420973543528,"score_spread":0.2706098679467838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165357967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61553687,0.00005939426,0.000027374157,0.039733388,0.00009454242,0.00026198238,2.1431913e-7,0.000032494947,0.34425375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99242246,0.0000024683125,0.0010393438,0.0035731324,0.00009277075,0.000025468984,4.3136143e-7,0.00000323261,0.002840697],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922234,0.00016536085,0.00009570306,0.00011662052,0.00020638497,0.00019359995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956125,0.00016880552,0.000021833319,0.000114079674,0.00006451291,0.00006952892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006671978,0.000042741718,0.000050860162,0.000035609122,0.0002088627,0.00025483684,0.00020971574,0.000052179403,0.0007349899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044988812,0.000028611721,0.000008084337,0.00049195834,0.000046447734,0.0004336797,0.0000474236,0.00010952649,0.00058990583],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012437056,0.00002800717,0.04087179,0.0000069551356,0.0000033251094,0.0000018317851,0.8250647,0.000003650711,0.00029856898,0.1135629,0.008038457,0.012118559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021636818,0.000036407913,0.038538575,0.000020006157,0.0000049567298,0.000001168832,0.22057766,0.00037365372,0.000015754102,0.008614562,0.73136127,0.00023962246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019036224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010194205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7233228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029196746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022277942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9874961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167603032","doi":"10.25159/2522-6800/7124","title":"Prosecutorial Discretion and Judicial Review: An Analysis of Recent Canadian and South African Decisions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Southern African Public Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Judicial review; Appeal; Political science; Scrutiny; Judicial discretion; Principle of legality; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Discretion; Judicial activism","score_opus":0.035878895317085775,"score_gpt":0.3093612923735879,"score_spread":0.2734823970565021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167603032","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28704357,0.02676936,0.0008088868,0.06504932,0.002717348,0.0034202812,0.006696184,0.00055626925,0.6069388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99735117,0.0008018673,0.00041655192,0.00047746507,0.00033049993,0.000026861715,0.00008802024,0.00002415499,0.0004834243],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684197,0.00071678485,0.00046981193,0.00059647893,0.0007620221,0.000612961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974273,0.00017255025,0.00024717688,0.0005248444,0.0006015338,0.0010266183],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014426826,0.00019969734,0.0005885735,0.0002897947,0.0007146551,0.00028929816,0.00034846226,0.0001665761,0.0010947321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017751028,0.00018608978,0.0001280854,0.0029196101,0.0010714962,0.0003017652,0.00009962741,0.00020342275,0.000011056492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006043211,0.00023884307,0.020243833,0.000061634164,0.0009609082,0.000049074366,0.63081527,0.0000059049257,0.000044774744,0.3220623,0.0005089776,0.024948021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003695117,0.00007923014,0.0012937209,0.000077776895,0.0010878101,0.0000012719757,0.09114935,0.00007469084,0.0000060081898,0.002910802,0.90249735,0.00045250013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15850565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67744565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9019883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002449505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011481899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168065586","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a7662","title":"Editorial: Determining the Content of Indigenous Law with Special Reference to Recording of the Law - Continental Views","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Diversity (politics); Political science; Cape; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.022941763180475437,"score_gpt":0.2918479840411488,"score_spread":0.2689062208606734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168065586","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012443649,0.003739997,0.00005780975,0.0011803037,0.9205173,0.0042900816,0.0004406771,0.0001591448,0.057170987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3472664,0.00061203033,0.00019923203,0.00014554334,0.64924127,0.000121998295,0.00005369054,0.00027280915,0.0020870368],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821264,0.0025237533,0.003085457,0.0014746276,0.0068451352,0.003944632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850558,0.0030302426,0.0052945963,0.0024733676,0.0034161161,0.0007298819],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064600674,0.0016177732,0.003078676,0.00024880466,0.003270398,0.0008346399,0.0066465153,0.002014665,0.00016368566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021950188,0.0010381629,0.0012791748,0.0013374713,0.0035710295,0.0010108931,0.0009736196,0.008934225,0.00006522428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003267325,0.0008027398,0.00068615226,0.0003927123,0.0028769225,0.00002750314,0.058912136,0.0001809682,0.0008774424,0.1636023,0.76645845,0.001915353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026754956,0.0020314008,0.000014998642,0.0009988343,0.0008678752,0.00001553746,0.0053170323,0.0000012389457,0.0010203373,0.0011763275,0.9847689,0.0011120118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025978187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11330174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33482277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046794815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067288787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171212085","doi":"10.1177/09646639211022786","title":"Settler Colonialism and the South African TRC: Ambivalent Denial and Democratisation Without Decolonisation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Decolonization; Denial; Democratization; Scholarship; Gender studies; Ambivalence; Sociology; Political science; History; Politics; Law; Democracy; Psychology; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.03660394011820325,"score_gpt":0.3507990178362136,"score_spread":0.31419507771801036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171212085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8900316,0.007872253,0.000045952267,0.0829922,0.0009147853,0.0007310319,0.000024444955,0.00012802942,0.01725973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955831,0.00035657219,0.00022177915,0.0005331661,0.0011102164,0.00007787043,0.0000032547657,0.000014012807,0.002100039],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977961,0.00078467035,0.00025357536,0.00031928756,0.00050649134,0.00033983265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989995,0.0003924267,0.0001578528,0.00009668113,0.0002783759,0.00007519622],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009387176,0.0001615616,0.00035554837,0.000027334714,0.0030717251,0.00032123167,0.000115929026,0.00012120232,0.000024982386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012793984,0.00012752102,0.00007116561,0.0002805324,0.0023448977,0.0002386623,0.00018946792,0.00019888327,0.0000097001275],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101570455,0.000020664782,0.009693044,0.000015432093,0.00016762482,0.000009358602,0.8847717,8.378625e-7,0.000016677626,0.10140032,0.001822856,0.0019799143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004597648,0.00010435936,0.066334344,0.000039618262,0.00060497504,0.000005320245,0.4235257,0.00004219893,0.00011358575,0.041257758,0.46266034,0.000714173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015071523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008287926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.461246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019468652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020515734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99822617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173401672","doi":"10.18820/24150517/jjs44.i2.02","title":"Reconsidering the “pay now, argue later” approach of South Africa in relation to disputed taxes – lessons from Canada and Australia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Relation (database); Enforcement; Revenue; Service (business); Political science; Internal revenue; Law; Sociology; Economics; History; Economy; Archaeology; Finance","score_opus":0.04987300977789767,"score_gpt":0.2404725915238684,"score_spread":0.19059958174597075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173401672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872266,0.000055965018,0.00022149386,0.0006726029,0.0007986767,0.00026110414,0.00006747693,0.000012781778,0.010683321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99456227,0.0000034547115,0.0019148596,0.0000042218426,0.000082585204,6.134565e-7,0.000005292408,0.000003249083,0.0034234396],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893415,0.00013325342,0.00012904238,0.00023519757,0.00040948717,0.00015885608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993132,0.00015559023,0.00015076117,0.00018778518,0.000100280966,0.00009241314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023933152,0.00008277687,0.00016983072,0.000057776484,0.0003446835,0.00001976914,0.00025434943,0.00010595087,0.000025743324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010668375,0.00007943567,0.000035573805,0.00027019094,0.00032502314,0.00027221508,0.00009517755,0.00016803498,0.0000043869695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016686523,0.00006651631,0.52023214,0.000052869582,0.00010648756,0.00003708778,0.42544279,0.010845385,0.0025890884,0.039329857,0.0010674857,0.00006344179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011798803,0.00007562544,0.78035355,0.0003404458,0.00012481885,0.0000034188147,0.08828547,0.001064997,0.00074428134,0.0013658269,0.12584174,0.00061996916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48550358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38575473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3371573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033790286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065178063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62545365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175924501","doi":"","title":"Locating the Woman: A Note on Customary Law and the Utility of Real Property in the Swaziland Context","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Land law; Property law; Property (philosophy); Political science; Law; Real property; Property rights; Cultural property; Common law; Corporate governance; Land tenure; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography; Business; Cultural heritage","score_opus":0.011313079288811534,"score_gpt":0.2797180075449119,"score_spread":0.26840492825610035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175924501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5177234,0.0033093714,0.000023139846,0.01477015,0.0001887549,0.00084933144,0.000001642976,0.000014496719,0.46311975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971164,0.0005337899,0.0000042332354,0.00083847827,0.00017157973,0.000007823714,1.7952941e-7,0.0000069360585,0.0013205883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969741,0.0011983418,0.0002509706,0.00014049135,0.0004922913,0.00094378024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987627,0.0007054745,0.0001778609,0.0002598059,0.00006405623,0.000030090596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009659087,0.00009761067,0.00017667648,0.000020881187,0.00058356347,0.00009376583,0.00067569956,0.00006318138,0.000026009073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002711246,0.000034806963,0.00006656743,0.0002183162,0.0008678377,0.00012635716,0.00005274801,0.0016212955,0.0000140978755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005102531,0.000065568216,0.00692162,0.00000952814,0.00004339025,0.0000024356673,0.20816498,0.000005427183,0.000017507331,0.7667298,0.0001869733,0.017342571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007334228,0.0011076864,0.007759959,0.0002110452,0.00013890176,0.00013476524,0.38241652,0.0017182591,0.00007280936,0.39873794,0.19981484,0.0005530619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01585534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039614063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47939304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002065423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008928486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99069816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176221380","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3109060","title":"Nigeria's Federation Account As a Subject of a Garnishee Order - A Review of CBN v Obla Ubana &amp; Ors (2016)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Order (exchange); Political science; Economics; Library science; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.05342914084251092,"score_gpt":0.40920009996330303,"score_spread":0.3557709591207921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176221380","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000007460978,0.96745104,0.00017549533,0.00024623823,0.0006089126,0.0011168628,0.000019186224,0.000029813595,0.030345002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00034939917,0.9879194,0.00013280235,0.000050571365,0.0009341201,0.000050092465,0.000029924948,0.000078330595,0.010455373],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922251,0.0015660488,0.0017921581,0.00049784087,0.0014627158,0.0024561249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99348897,0.00031251682,0.004106917,0.00088424043,0.0010006335,0.00020670998],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010748995,0.00055324705,0.0028409876,0.00029120262,0.0010024392,0.00028622476,0.0019419173,0.00056987704,0.00064848055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005622087,0.00044353696,0.0011254237,0.00068843894,0.00049722084,0.00048895855,0.00014450373,0.003112757,0.0002106694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003397413,0.00016668238,0.000016572758,0.026395604,0.0011787103,0.000011053212,0.005980414,3.5688663e-7,9.688789e-7,0.029831603,0.0025624677,0.9338216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017567103,0.00015700179,3.6525054e-7,0.042179868,0.000760439,0.0000971822,0.000403118,8.89305e-8,2.7473683e-7,0.007673917,0.9481643,0.00038780473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021088037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009118421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9456018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023301342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04106958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179505124","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v39i3.11341","title":"EXTRA-CURIAL STATEMENTS BY A NON- TESTIFYING CO-ACCUSED, THE CANADIAN SUPREME COURT AND CHANGE IN SOUTH AFRICA","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Hearsay; Appeal; Supreme court; Political science; Economic Justice; Statement (logic); Common law; Law of the case; Court of record; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.0769069062069869,"score_gpt":0.36522825698616346,"score_spread":0.28832135077917653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179505124","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75889254,0.00085533876,0.00002639275,0.005496012,0.0015144695,0.0018332654,0.00038843718,0.00009501988,0.23089853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968606,0.0000056117337,0.00011907128,0.0006610443,0.00066206674,0.000060045943,0.000006313592,0.000015763557,0.0016094785],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853003,0.00013033357,0.00016308465,0.000245512,0.00033343487,0.00059757725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937594,0.00007488585,0.00005656986,0.00018807147,0.00006161905,0.00024292931],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000680098,0.00011903595,0.00012313198,0.000097663644,0.00064431946,0.00026993442,0.00030653644,0.000104474144,0.0006052805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001250901,0.000093328024,0.00002063252,0.0003057434,0.0005476229,0.00031565505,0.000044737677,0.00015743746,0.00023119646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000130315475,0.000014727012,0.056399506,0.0000045329703,0.00000835794,0.000010746059,0.93211675,4.4142485e-8,0.00006991936,0.00016661534,0.010505615,0.00069013383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045367522,0.000049849503,0.0042673475,0.000027723741,0.000009769545,2.3331323e-7,0.004166027,0.000061030634,0.000039717106,0.00015601283,0.99057436,0.00019423192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20054168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40522355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98006874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021120427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017963247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.804782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183559477","doi":"10.1017/9781108283618.005","title":"Remedies for Laws That Violate Human Rights","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Declaration; Interim; Law; Political science; Damages; Parliament; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.054741096793653625,"score_gpt":0.27108160459509034,"score_spread":0.2163405078014367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183559477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009268315,0.00045347266,0.00011349344,0.000045959485,0.00076836767,0.000744957,0.00031783758,0.00024048277,0.9972227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008021293,0.00004767948,0.00024641614,0.00004749735,0.000715639,0.0000024909557,0.000084313666,0.000047123885,0.99078757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802,0.00010017643,0.00019097001,0.0006503748,0.0005331726,0.0005052999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983272,0.0001875285,0.0002736081,0.0005680145,0.0003722214,0.00027141185],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026018592,0.0003665094,0.0005308865,0.00013503688,0.0018634538,0.00013919592,0.00087028585,0.0006399678,0.000034693272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027863507,0.0004288801,0.00039159562,0.0000121373505,0.0009362499,0.00015797568,0.00038844318,0.0004484617,0.00001965342],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027571701,0.000006410067,0.000001969863,0.00004971746,0.00013289627,0.00018726909,0.003214722,1.7185675e-7,0.000011953845,0.95611644,0.040137276,0.00011363119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039125973,0.000031607862,0.0000018053814,0.00019184707,0.0002554979,7.8793323e-7,0.00032721309,0.0000014956577,0.00022843495,0.0003545626,0.99771583,0.0004996479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021549936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005897252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95757854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041897988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016538182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184041181","doi":"10.1111/capa.12411","title":"Le droit de contracter avec l'État : Le principe d'égalité devant le service public en droit des marchés publics québécois","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"École Nationale d'Administration Publique","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02626523371792836,"score_gpt":0.2685474781656884,"score_spread":0.24228224444776006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184041181","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21175395,0.0036151162,0.0017132624,0.6716966,0.0016727598,0.0007794052,0.0006433654,0.00022492677,0.107900634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9641326,0.00012391225,0.0020934339,0.005291736,0.0011650467,0.00012915157,0.000640807,0.0001062133,0.026317084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931081,0.0013363956,0.0009931852,0.0010887362,0.00091687427,0.002556707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99245673,0.0004548603,0.0003991645,0.000944461,0.0019048643,0.003839916],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023396008,0.00052260916,0.00057503296,0.00039206888,0.0021150627,0.003169039,0.0013073058,0.00097560295,0.0014385175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003897366,0.00074776955,0.00025450898,0.0027183024,0.0011858849,0.0041487226,0.0001656034,0.00091595645,0.00032294847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010791791,0.00032644015,0.0049982457,0.00014298769,0.00013774452,0.0004916312,0.024162678,0.0000017584657,0.000077190314,0.9517326,0.0017981322,0.016119847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065456703,0.00009034057,0.006409008,0.000059763977,0.00005899491,0.0001583294,0.014872278,0.0005203627,0.00031689828,0.026735296,0.9493412,0.00078296085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5433796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9475431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003935336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14674067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186140732","doi":"","title":"Access Barred: The Effects of the Cuts and Restructuring of Legal Aid in B.C. on Women Attempting to Navigate the Provincial Family Court System","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.008391708723394908,"score_gpt":0.27462851516831144,"score_spread":0.26623680644491654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186140732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9815758,0.000094559175,0.0000011388578,0.001036408,0.0012422526,0.0010507111,0.000011421532,0.000034392648,0.014953336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99880975,0.0000024831995,0.0000441082,0.00031056462,0.00044192886,0.00008192957,2.1097654e-7,0.000018120945,0.00029088173],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976393,0.0005537227,0.0003564608,0.00028361182,0.00071937684,0.00044753426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982552,0.0007202644,0.00023288374,0.00056515733,0.00008467238,0.00014181319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017723737,0.00016092729,0.000268983,0.00003600034,0.0006964216,0.00023124297,0.0014067705,0.00013027819,0.000007490417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012275756,0.00008692536,0.000059225837,0.00043457586,0.0006761915,0.00029462588,0.00043370933,0.0007332057,0.0000075800585],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052667933,0.00014611652,0.20202845,0.0014353724,0.00014062448,0.000059614165,0.4095864,0.0003967532,0.04671823,0.3327225,0.0012242004,0.0050150347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004480479,0.0007721577,0.56775117,0.0049224817,0.0001700019,0.000015640462,0.078364655,0.00021127598,0.05896783,0.004571815,0.27809438,0.0016781067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017715927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009765087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36572272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001509773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019039809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9888252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186341787","doi":"","title":"Improvising with Peter","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Generosity; Improvisation; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Scholarship; Kindness; Active listening; Relation (database); Sociology; Field (mathematics); Art; Aesthetics; Psychology; Law; Visual arts; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.007755458721970919,"score_gpt":0.2751028534742512,"score_spread":0.26734739475228025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186341787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33027506,0.021521024,0.017447205,0.00788312,0.0012339937,0.000258701,0.000002415831,0.00023256951,0.6211459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981879,0.00060410355,0.0006213193,0.00015379996,0.0007557131,0.0000014207917,5.8525615e-7,0.000015976673,0.015968105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969987,0.00017851571,0.00013317955,0.00015913563,0.00044468284,0.002085776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943775,0.000045737048,0.00008024517,0.00012886092,0.00018802848,0.000119378325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012945702,0.00008612257,0.00011243826,0.000038171704,0.00062745984,0.00020825471,0.00022756093,0.00005893602,0.00016302444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016557833,0.00007046269,0.000063693944,0.000300684,0.0001307594,0.00028505843,0.000028886072,0.0012880692,0.000066125926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073862364,0.00010980804,0.007306365,0.000006114277,0.0002624343,0.00021855078,0.07487375,0.000017389753,0.0006715901,0.8613421,0.00023472018,0.054883342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001168479,0.00039999944,0.00029993601,0.00005173513,0.000101287,0.0006626571,0.07254991,0.000011173316,0.00054391776,0.25561574,0.6680545,0.0005406751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018434002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005510128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6678198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000916328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006592692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186537419","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v40i3.11191","title":"Caveat Jurisconsultus: Warrantless Access to the Client Records of Legal Practitioners","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Legislation; Warrant; Law; Legislature; Confidentiality; Political science; Business; Constitution","score_opus":0.024129306489278527,"score_gpt":0.34774169685732614,"score_spread":0.3236123903680476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186537419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5268259,0.0000813294,0.000055142096,0.010358729,0.0018850754,0.0005891283,0.000026813244,0.000038971717,0.4601389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97394454,0.000013501739,0.00021400761,0.0011057747,0.00028151454,0.000026336484,0.000003251676,0.000010565853,0.024400508],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987096,0.00017567204,0.00019942879,0.00021094651,0.00043341436,0.00027091068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991458,0.0001584067,0.00010712978,0.0003491861,0.00014792252,0.0000915441],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055919157,0.00008661644,0.00014306224,0.000053295433,0.00017466355,0.00019016406,0.00061409466,0.00006844984,0.001325797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019021014,0.000059252725,0.00006425798,0.00040245036,0.00015017383,0.00052661286,0.00013321973,0.00014352253,0.0010279195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025227747,0.00027777508,0.09226061,0.0000758258,0.00012538982,0.000019513447,0.6113681,0.00022930514,0.001274109,0.052413035,0.23340218,0.008301849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001334037,0.000029446112,0.0016365582,0.000025259167,0.000010854315,4.3354677e-7,0.003970651,0.000005482718,0.00046895424,0.00008612953,0.99353164,0.000101168065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030148965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010460536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7601295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008177104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001349016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189319554","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1268","title":"Reimagining Toronto’s Community Councils","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stewardship (theology); Public administration; Local government; Corporate governance; Citizen journalism; Function (biology); Power (physics); Political science; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Public relations; Management; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.05488240855583334,"score_gpt":0.3888048319306447,"score_spread":0.3339224233748114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189319554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058707576,0.0006793443,0.000030673018,0.024284778,0.00030243726,0.000057545913,0.0000045565175,0.000026989186,0.9159061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906834,0.00012444613,0.00021828344,0.0044050105,0.0039415834,1.7403825e-7,3.0797312e-7,0.000004416161,0.0006224248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860805,0.00041537182,0.00025054702,0.000042618703,0.0004416231,0.00024179151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992487,0.00008502795,0.00021671086,0.00006618779,0.000249838,0.00013356126],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016337788,0.000071804825,0.0002127581,0.000023575953,0.0013286908,0.00013699789,0.00025951443,0.00009316277,0.000033077242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020803731,0.000058141384,0.0000852936,0.0000777291,0.00039380646,0.000524058,0.000018115716,0.00043459478,0.0000028838638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014369286,0.00003876898,0.000044489425,0.0000023312853,0.000011695295,0.000004809966,0.46457198,1.0912008e-7,0.000052904983,0.52929264,0.0013384181,0.0046274597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003444209,0.00013667616,0.0013497646,0.000014476282,0.000021152266,0.000004755754,0.019631594,5.389819e-7,0.00000882494,0.048584305,0.92980057,0.000102933045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045835946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004081312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9319758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039380832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038723028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189387988","doi":"10.4018/978-1-7998-7898-8.ch011","title":"Challenges Facing Mediation as a Means of Court-Connected Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Ashanti Region of Ghana","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in public policy and administration (APPA) book series","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.04995125228873101,"score_gpt":0.33630475771760043,"score_spread":0.2863535054288694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189387988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000964638,0.028135475,0.00012530731,0.015750453,0.00025821102,0.00067932677,0.00009588013,0.00003893459,0.9539518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8912447,0.09230049,0.00014089426,0.00013746758,0.0004243568,0.00004564017,0.00008736595,0.000019799681,0.015599296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750984,0.00035822397,0.0007120419,0.00041680565,0.0006931783,0.00030992195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796826,0.0005591853,0.0008352136,0.00028956094,0.00026852026,0.00007927894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008518544,0.0002615253,0.00047221122,0.00037883638,0.00019026877,0.00008319664,0.00035166577,0.0003088857,0.00003143675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016065077,0.00024059921,0.000080866586,0.00025831655,0.0010154675,0.0027697145,0.00006532619,0.00032452555,0.0000013763023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005565611,0.000033458055,0.00003848051,0.000106072286,0.000022564482,0.000018988398,0.050681442,0.000008461352,0.0000059447207,0.94489497,0.000018263116,0.004115707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043591933,0.00035692516,0.00018327647,0.00062780874,0.000030237607,0.00001565241,0.021620851,0.000028378292,0.00020982503,0.09762825,0.8784904,0.00037248404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005062866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018042166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93835247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001554045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009349369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191729461","doi":"","title":"Learning from the experts: A new approach to poverty reduction South African Homeless People's Federation and People's Dialogue on Land and Shelter","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Social Work","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Poverty; Poverty reduction; Poor people; Economic growth; Political science; Development economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.02501548186102481,"score_gpt":0.2866277817562159,"score_spread":0.2616122998951911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191729461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89455605,0.00039186567,0.0010272672,0.04654956,0.0004941148,0.00063566235,0.000019574005,0.00019454981,0.05613138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99493414,0.00001922619,0.0004119851,0.00072785706,0.0026018342,0.000037632588,0.000013686368,0.00002013922,0.0012335185],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807125,0.00047657438,0.00017559562,0.00044124326,0.00041651932,0.00041882877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989943,0.00053506927,0.000026613545,0.00011394934,0.000046485267,0.0002835659],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033570296,0.00016180566,0.00026490047,0.000023534787,0.0025393213,0.0006912702,0.00015998214,0.00018965051,0.00037146983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088426337,0.00012901511,0.00005100321,0.00050249964,0.0003225372,0.00017621327,0.000054437045,0.00030476277,0.000060629955],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019036426,0.00007478711,0.0088518765,0.0000058924056,0.000017356462,0.0000014035596,0.9449818,0.000020281548,0.0000058478063,0.007836946,0.0048810914,0.03313231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002000824,0.0003801903,0.17613026,0.00016571853,0.0002639949,0.000003655527,0.39461973,0.00017763727,0.000017194927,0.016774984,0.40768382,0.001781988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033031863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072885305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5503621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009654181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058572416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195038048","doi":"","title":"Director's Duty to Act for a Proper Purpose in the Context of Distribution under the Companies Act 71 of 2008","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Statute; Statutory law; Statutory interpretation; Law; Companies Act; Context (archaeology); Common law; Interpretation (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Statute of limitations; Face (sociological concept); Law and economics; Political science; Business; Corporate law; Economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.0166167324502717,"score_gpt":0.30246970897346087,"score_spread":0.2858529765231892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195038048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872967,0.0023732837,0.00069504924,0.005776425,0.0002570385,0.0011914464,0.000028560873,0.000010162771,0.0023713144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987849,0.00020392748,0.000013292156,0.00010504988,0.00014494853,0.000019015675,0.0000028448007,0.000008272925,0.000717778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777293,0.00038990504,0.00028511923,0.00011787545,0.0004446391,0.0009895177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990487,0.00034469532,0.00020437414,0.00018365713,0.00017928897,0.00003927745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035755606,0.0000955406,0.00021427682,0.00003693119,0.0002283034,0.000049041166,0.0006559149,0.000060627743,0.000032305255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029704507,0.000051122144,0.00012136568,0.00034731408,0.00020115123,0.0001584297,0.000033134365,0.0006167925,0.000012393581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007178831,0.00040168973,0.025746986,0.00003091531,0.00024757173,8.3676395e-7,0.19593234,0.00019009397,0.0014032791,0.7592638,0.0018675858,0.014196996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002827533,0.0022237475,0.021912245,0.00017510311,0.00015619553,0.000029058823,0.39672935,0.000120836914,0.0017900363,0.088913284,0.4845679,0.00055471656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015024813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011431704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67035055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005929428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013123307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6379159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195498398","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.33.1.04","title":"Section 28’s Potential to Guarantee Substantive Gender Equality in <i>Hak c Procureur général du Québec</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Gender equality; Charter; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Action (physics); Order (exchange); Sociology; Constitutional court; Law and economics; Gender studies; Constitution; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.025733274067818057,"score_gpt":0.26755339791935123,"score_spread":0.24182012385153318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195498398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9386213,0.00142341,0.00014281951,0.028027683,0.00095563015,0.00022050101,0.00002635484,0.000008504181,0.030573819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99519,0.00005694345,0.0000623358,0.0023662804,0.00065560115,0.000008409307,0.0000012003617,0.0000141968285,0.0016450146],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801135,0.0006190605,0.00038581537,0.00018841385,0.00021873647,0.00057664345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987198,0.00014363385,0.00017350909,0.0001494846,0.00026455303,0.0005490367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024388498,0.00012240419,0.00034075155,0.0001147658,0.00039617595,0.00024524718,0.0003185246,0.000098321456,0.00018203608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054236886,0.000109153036,0.000104408544,0.00044622974,0.0004163069,0.00029708905,0.000033057982,0.00041489274,0.000010315346],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001387172,0.000025892865,0.0077997227,0.000017990129,0.00007036313,0.00037117762,0.62694836,0.000094261115,0.000035514688,0.36346713,0.00058942457,0.00044146084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004083901,0.00019370603,0.0062094377,0.00016906987,0.00008196371,0.0002758346,0.117621206,0.000058217793,0.000111955116,0.18322895,0.6873326,0.0006331833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1624403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8094341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68674314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010361357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002583606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8431371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195954957","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.152","title":"An Analysis of Public Order Policing in the Gauteng Province, South Africa","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Legitimacy; Order (exchange); Democracy; Public relations; Public administration; Public order; Political science; Public engagement; Public service; Civil society; Public trust; Sociology; Law; Politics; Business","score_opus":0.08456295755198988,"score_gpt":0.37624038195952453,"score_spread":0.29167742440753464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195954957","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872775,0.0008177807,0.00071211014,0.0069495514,0.00035909345,0.000030082723,0.0000064556725,0.0000041568624,0.003843232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99853367,0.00010240878,0.0005140208,0.0005503028,0.0002254116,0.0000013177097,0.0000039486304,0.0000029380674,0.000065983106],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978196,0.0011814996,0.0003914282,0.000118784024,0.00028190142,0.00020676201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998175,0.00054885715,0.00032992222,0.00010186217,0.00079372426,0.00005061892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014143765,0.000064584565,0.00028339628,0.00041146926,0.00010511011,0.000033268265,0.00057991623,0.00017895226,0.000120117635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012775767,0.000048387894,0.00009761567,0.00013505691,0.00095253286,0.00019339964,0.000050863935,0.00032023928,0.0000010525401],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002412859,0.000115271476,0.089035414,0.0000018137788,0.00055255694,0.00013553939,0.47877467,0.00008410882,0.00012357491,0.42985073,0.000031052135,0.0012711277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017865209,0.00048899604,0.54903305,0.00002902149,0.0012516989,0.00012168449,0.25175285,0.0006716018,0.00011423855,0.152007,0.042375475,0.00036785207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024818635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003873112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45999765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006210514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004675426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3509647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197169129","doi":"","title":"(Re)creating Boundary Lines: Assessing Toronto's Ward Boundary Review Process","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"TD Bank","keywords":"Appeal; Corporate governance; Boundary (topology); Representation (politics); Process (computing); Public administration; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Geography; Management; Law; Computer science; Politics; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.035098699703135276,"score_gpt":0.35840714699723614,"score_spread":0.32330844729410085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197169129","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018875958,0.050853066,0.00020458928,0.0044391616,0.0005233967,0.0004221518,0.000011449396,0.00017133077,0.9244989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751633,0.008349808,0.003881046,0.00012614275,0.0003372531,8.638231e-7,0.000005819434,0.000020686382,0.012115101],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979426,0.00021503356,0.00017600966,0.00041492583,0.0007564443,0.00049493246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978125,0.00010608496,0.00063981186,0.0007956781,0.0003916048,0.00025432176],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010208647,0.00020506987,0.00050064235,0.00001436201,0.0045044026,0.0003447069,0.0015533379,0.00017948759,0.01640137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007535739,0.0002490941,0.00019140413,0.000052601677,0.0011707906,0.004795328,0.00033554598,0.00017987024,0.000041716063],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078166515,0.00019268123,0.010411356,0.0018643166,0.00018364134,0.00011024661,0.7912254,0.0000025263048,0.000076800425,0.0019467289,0.007489695,0.18641844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007807258,0.00010748639,0.04456584,0.0031742488,0.00032103152,0.0000013649124,0.3692359,0.00008367699,0.000019362267,0.00016442756,0.5807983,0.00074763416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5171964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45367083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9562873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010177296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076082523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197908878","doi":"","title":"Reimagining Toronto's Community Councils","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Local government; Humanities; Sociology; Public administration; Art","score_opus":0.04962825735037202,"score_gpt":0.3389958492203268,"score_spread":0.28936759186995475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197908878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03674419,0.00082894013,0.000032241922,0.0019676234,0.001559366,0.0002156851,0.000017955255,0.0002632951,0.9583707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782453,0.00006997143,0.0013402282,0.00079816853,0.0010387701,0.00002076109,0.0000036187125,0.000023707169,0.018459443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752337,0.00059209793,0.00024284078,0.0002456741,0.00079702836,0.00059898006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972305,0.00022637754,0.00022657332,0.0016493028,0.00026074352,0.00040648706],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027782575,0.00017056048,0.00025585643,0.000010706361,0.0070668766,0.0011305911,0.0020814892,0.00016306879,0.0021642493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021483544,0.00015549724,0.00009923873,0.00004953745,0.001219714,0.0017883988,0.0002942933,0.00080424384,0.0010489217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053992604,0.0002233755,0.036605004,0.00003863966,0.00009313258,0.00006102928,0.24409555,0.000004440979,0.00026291347,0.67492145,0.036586303,0.0070541827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029996881,0.000028353083,0.0034801185,0.00003974238,0.000017039112,5.706028e-7,0.0056417747,0.0000056695812,0.00007571744,0.005839281,0.98432606,0.00024571337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38969246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27505493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9477397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006528339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029523732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198319603","doi":"","title":"ACPNS Legal Case Notes Series 2021-79 Canadian Union of Postal Workers v B'nai Brith Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; Relation (database); Series (stratigraphy); High Court; Computer science","score_opus":0.0063282733207325114,"score_gpt":0.21071020671401483,"score_spread":0.2043819333932823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198319603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9536911,0.00017055767,0.000032300894,0.013603137,0.00021977483,0.00013052873,0.00018958567,0.000052970347,0.03191002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99432814,0.000063985375,0.001630026,0.000022064882,0.000023363622,1.6343468e-7,0.000009528652,0.000007711709,0.003915031],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987708,0.00010472386,0.00015379782,0.00030423567,0.00025717542,0.00040929473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988645,0.00006117774,0.00012719672,0.00038753482,0.00034762255,0.00021202213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020016314,0.00012517595,0.00027500433,0.0002339582,0.00048058343,0.000016108981,0.00044372486,0.00029747875,0.0005638598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034670747,0.00015917851,0.000065648084,0.00087615114,0.0009210502,0.00018604293,0.00021207026,0.00028496448,0.000009860063],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010959978,0.00014277056,0.86455566,0.00008357331,0.00038442336,0.033264842,0.023393655,0.000056524565,0.00048238752,0.04982159,0.007641934,0.020063056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006196889,0.00006151938,0.019411677,0.00010469202,0.000088324996,0.00018388257,0.098593734,0.0000076673805,0.0036560085,0.0006337327,0.8762197,0.00041941152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9958053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99936885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8685777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004652332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036451234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64911115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199096622","doi":"","title":"Effective Remediation in Public Procurement: Damages or Judicial Review?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Procurement; Damages; Liability; Business; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.029347270289572378,"score_gpt":0.32532028746549585,"score_spread":0.29597301717592345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199096622","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07326807,0.27849007,0.006065496,0.4840941,0.002714864,0.008975576,0.000014327381,0.0007024123,0.14567508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9651981,0.03149348,0.000053914697,0.0013565375,0.0015043663,0.00003501728,0.000002411979,0.000015722488,0.00034043298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99637425,0.0006681372,0.00033927,0.00022582077,0.0006018823,0.0017906608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921185,0.000114159855,0.00022358014,0.00008855126,0.00016926765,0.000192587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004186301,0.00012596372,0.00024371794,0.00008734793,0.00034496665,0.00010021792,0.00045534613,0.000087715955,0.00016745045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004723812,0.00010442336,0.00007465402,0.001031746,0.000109147106,0.0005538563,0.0000453545,0.0016835359,0.000092470385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046356727,0.0003364628,0.022267269,0.0003140234,0.00029788134,0.000079640165,0.15687376,0.000010165486,0.00023725576,0.58088213,0.009197025,0.2290408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021889887,0.0013658701,0.001229723,0.00055304036,0.00012453386,0.00002001209,0.017503213,0.000048687773,0.00006961066,0.11433814,0.861899,0.00065914245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019123236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007413091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89193004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016515552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038437068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7314219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199977776","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v32i2.12265","title":"WHICH STRUCTURES DOES THE HOUSEBREAKING CRIME PROTECT?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Law; Fence (mathematics); Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Business; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.017192545392954086,"score_gpt":0.3081281536896537,"score_spread":0.2909356082966996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199977776","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18835524,0.0010258319,0.00016168864,0.01475418,0.0020497546,0.0005549458,0.000014513303,0.00033527068,0.7927486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98957235,0.00000554048,0.00068105425,0.00075325085,0.0007720164,0.000021345195,0.0000011937232,0.000013542446,0.008179733],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878776,0.000248544,0.00010639378,0.00020322551,0.0003492949,0.00030477703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993303,0.00011226794,0.000043145952,0.00030355572,0.00015608009,0.000054641037],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030411442,0.00008155882,0.00009089857,0.000017072462,0.0005574734,0.00029507975,0.00031680052,0.00008258026,0.0014187865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004940918,0.00004491894,0.000047508922,0.00034925013,0.00016346425,0.00014073592,0.000106242005,0.00019971903,0.000115722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022134755,0.00006312858,0.012894998,0.00004351001,0.000100031946,0.00008360699,0.73187864,0.000016483293,0.004022553,0.22632675,0.011830994,0.012717174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089702415,0.00000639005,0.004074802,0.000015328787,0.000015814332,0.0000020539997,0.0042298753,0.000004260941,0.0046488564,0.01539,0.97137886,0.00014403848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006609833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017622801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9595479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044168093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013341178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201436197","doi":"10.33423/jabe.v23i2.4089","title":"The Impact of the New Regulation of Public Enterprise Contracts on the Cameroonian System of Public Procurement Contracting","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Business and Economics","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Procurement; Dynamism; Business; Adjudication; Constructive; Law and economics; Industrial organization; Law; Economics; Marketing; Process (computing); Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.029745005759056118,"score_gpt":0.26370523671148144,"score_spread":0.23396023095242532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201436197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.987354,0.0004993801,0.00008902835,0.0045897197,0.00029350107,0.0002465136,0.0000057845373,0.0000026992348,0.006919404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994656,0.00020725769,0.000045976965,0.000021783035,0.00021517597,0.0000019858796,3.386462e-7,0.0000075419675,0.000034333472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987622,0.000088413326,0.0006617438,0.000086477456,0.00021306741,0.00018811556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99681187,0.00043136228,0.0019030148,0.00020758169,0.00056515017,0.00008103224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019929653,0.00009127587,0.0003061374,0.000041806314,0.00027515454,0.00018241582,0.00033266318,0.0000650154,0.0000146281445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005363937,0.000046109,0.00012422605,0.0002349455,0.00022662054,0.00022587733,0.00005504562,0.00015301825,4.0047223e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010876782,0.00083999144,0.051395524,0.00039429177,0.0020021908,0.0000049172436,0.11064186,0.011015142,0.011543523,0.6944363,0.0016564829,0.1149821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010104416,0.0006595738,0.54567105,0.0022325525,0.0008374752,0.000085990345,0.25957304,0.0048108744,0.023080448,0.020261975,0.13145472,0.00122788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002675814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022734272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6741743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020880924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000964383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2116294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202796054","doi":"10.1017/9781108283618.009","title":"Remedies for Social, Economic and Cultural Rights","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Damages; Eviction; Legislature; Interim; Cultural rights; Law and economics; Law; Human rights; International human rights law; Economics","score_opus":0.04090890984125542,"score_gpt":0.26541158050871483,"score_spread":0.2245026706674594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202796054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021265032,0.0006505935,0.00001765485,0.000113687835,0.0005239319,0.00043431975,0.000370082,0.000103009515,0.9975741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0042142468,0.0001674451,0.00017431886,0.00003478619,0.0008704267,0.0000014501951,0.00004445709,0.000022627788,0.99447024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885887,0.000053714848,0.00014166885,0.00045309824,0.00018322267,0.00030940544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991739,0.00012891347,0.00017479765,0.00018397046,0.00018163834,0.00015677861],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013611854,0.00024295665,0.0003870238,0.00006559965,0.0012480515,0.0001392864,0.0003640289,0.0004372791,0.000014019788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002035578,0.00027947765,0.00019936358,0.0000041505086,0.0010749343,0.00015065064,0.0002513131,0.00024029319,0.000009346876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023486404,0.000001844959,6.390284e-7,0.000031442236,0.00009392388,0.000035738154,0.006326625,7.16491e-8,0.0000026054279,0.9177108,0.07553565,0.00023717733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031257508,0.000015307889,0.000001731013,0.000046165947,0.0001437812,8.3959213e-7,0.0010858529,0.0000030015776,0.00003235534,0.00014718572,0.9978708,0.00034042052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013053152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024040331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92233515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004302799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019670575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205378507","doi":"","title":"Analysis of Construction Dispute Cases in Canadian Courts and Lessons Learned for Modular and Off-site Construction Contracts","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Construction contract; Process (computing); Business; Modular design; Contract management; Supreme court; Popularity; Engineering; Law; Political science; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.03948868914331469,"score_gpt":0.3367185654483378,"score_spread":0.29722987630502307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205378507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97093296,0.00055619347,0.000025912683,0.00081090484,0.00040725266,0.0007520348,0.000198766,0.00003091867,0.026285062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99657524,0.00068287324,0.00015583972,0.0000036271426,0.0001248899,0.0000050729327,0.0001782139,0.000020216035,0.0022540158],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971249,0.000646422,0.000312529,0.00068427157,0.00055194314,0.0006799124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978338,0.0005919785,0.0002704322,0.00023789037,0.0004032259,0.0006627062],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077364856,0.00020733499,0.00062161346,0.0024383708,0.0010785852,0.00017695015,0.0002635736,0.00043690097,0.000016997577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006202185,0.00026635488,0.00014775046,0.0018619676,0.0011788985,0.0003601927,0.00005061538,0.00058823166,9.740281e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026373812,0.0001234796,0.60915726,0.0006464751,0.0028430435,0.0023004974,0.11769086,0.00014793364,0.005930346,0.23523134,0.00014207137,0.023149291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041752644,0.0009848211,0.32251522,0.0006084793,0.005135503,0.000036398393,0.21073233,0.0067441263,0.0057147183,0.0048560854,0.43627426,0.0022227995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.716405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96009237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4361322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094807945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026550412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205980090","doi":"10.1017/s0147547901214136","title":"Glen Adler and Eddie Webster, eds., Trade Unions and Democratization in South Africa, 1985–1997. New York: St. Martin's Press, 2000. vii + 238 pp. $69.95 cloth.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; Democratization; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Economic history; Politics; Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political economy; Law; Sociology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.034546674694404506,"score_gpt":0.27198863033636417,"score_spread":0.23744195564195966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205980090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12917902,0.14000297,0.0024112016,0.023255318,0.0016754133,0.0038431154,0.0002455995,0.0011957817,0.6981916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95853174,0.001933275,0.002273278,0.00034226515,0.00057469326,0.000030721792,0.000024381778,0.000041878295,0.036247782],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750936,0.00031349008,0.00043494307,0.0005412801,0.00048893166,0.00071199075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891573,0.00017086479,0.00014099125,0.00029314862,0.00004051062,0.0004387713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048856315,0.00026248625,0.00032576977,0.00008063441,0.00045426475,0.0003083755,0.00030906076,0.0002720631,0.00080830685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025300117,0.00024320115,0.000048107562,0.0006952834,0.0004167424,0.00058486284,0.0001316707,0.00026558878,0.000046901154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014771114,0.0003822549,0.056835555,0.000045250268,0.00007432625,0.000039164443,0.6305907,0.000104504084,0.00008127303,0.021215793,0.26902646,0.021457043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089254323,0.00006851001,0.0024232508,0.000042038446,0.000041968447,0.0000015928609,0.0065438566,0.00062125904,0.000022797001,0.0026670154,0.9862976,0.00037756233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034791713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045185816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8293527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010690961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023754025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99174553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207502307","doi":"","title":"Freedom of Expression and Academic Freedom on Canadian University Campuses: Liberté d’expression et liberté universitaire sur les campus canadiens","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Undergraduate Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of expression; Humanities; Expression (computer science); Politics; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.031215914249968002,"score_gpt":0.29464194829337087,"score_spread":0.26342603404340287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207502307","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07276744,0.263098,0.00017530906,0.45790118,0.0037254037,0.0017113596,0.0009872789,0.00017571727,0.19945832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9096131,0.07773084,0.0008762618,0.0015836256,0.00016129714,0.000002038552,0.000014051138,0.000029259858,0.009989542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932364,0.0014062516,0.00056528754,0.0011417422,0.0013052587,0.0023450453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934826,0.0010176337,0.0002984801,0.0006958226,0.00074948964,0.0037560123],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016500597,0.00045416178,0.0008334168,0.0002883597,0.0014980012,0.00010245148,0.0012914704,0.0004504537,0.00028594577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002926623,0.00044358053,0.00022357855,0.0027825874,0.006860709,0.0011832676,0.0005933883,0.0010294813,0.000062054154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009099282,0.00010107052,0.002029566,0.0011122276,0.00002309203,0.00032325668,0.0048602987,0.000017911803,0.00048263502,0.98054343,0.0057907524,0.00470663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007556209,0.000244581,0.0018424754,0.026338387,0.00044540467,0.00005623949,0.007942407,0.00021221659,0.00095735665,0.014522529,0.9454634,0.001219365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5213249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33287916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96602094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027756772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0086169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211268824","doi":"","title":"Quantification of damages for malicious prosecution: A comparative analysis of recent South African and Commonwealth case law (2)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Law; Tort; Plaintiff; Confusion; Political science; Commonwealth; Cause of action; Action (physics); Element (criminal law); Liability; Psychology","score_opus":0.11505500301773637,"score_gpt":0.4004993345167652,"score_spread":0.28544433149902887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211268824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9708825,0.0009338382,0.013372531,0.000644671,0.00046900145,0.0006992265,0.0004982922,0.000024429997,0.012475563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99281937,0.000028954959,0.006642047,0.00006106289,0.00037118405,0.000008256647,0.0000057528473,0.000012951178,0.000050411894],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684346,0.00063143484,0.0011048693,0.00028157927,0.0007293394,0.0004092979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99360496,0.00070048956,0.002236108,0.00032237242,0.002785708,0.00035038136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002344595,0.00020753522,0.0009021338,0.0004951953,0.0005904388,0.00007262486,0.00043173446,0.00010911516,0.00005805385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009665647,0.00018497507,0.0002273024,0.0015526741,0.0024478887,0.00024504884,0.00005959668,0.0002382503,0.0000017596204],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010680943,0.00018855937,0.0006854558,0.0002566843,0.0005670461,0.000042641896,0.94887096,0.00012169899,0.00023531818,0.04743726,0.000073178555,0.00045310755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008248093,0.0017027295,0.0006983856,0.000082938925,0.015165901,0.00004995388,0.9710163,0.0005321782,0.0010293972,0.0004094576,0.008210016,0.00027792103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008283769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010068866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047027804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012793942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036629834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90193486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213018447","doi":"10.21128/1812-7126-2021-5-118-137","title":"The concept of human dignity in the case-law of the Supreme Court of Canada on Charter Equality Rights","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sravnitel noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Supreme court; Law; Human rights; Charter; Adjudication; Political science; Fundamental rights; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.034556323815057036,"score_gpt":0.3077362683404588,"score_spread":0.2731799445254018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213018447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7105975,0.0007323049,0.000014539629,0.005065104,0.0014838265,0.0009278327,0.00046847505,0.000024286735,0.2806861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990024,0.0000048474244,0.000024559135,0.0002589847,0.00015627588,0.000016533239,0.000008806726,0.000008797698,0.0005187761],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958596,0.0015921192,0.0007081108,0.0002864955,0.001098364,0.00045530318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966475,0.0013795618,0.00042429406,0.0010019944,0.00045843126,0.00008823938],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017844468,0.00019179781,0.00037245895,0.000033532997,0.0013407826,0.000046157948,0.0010869146,0.00013163121,0.0001447283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006474777,0.00010631344,0.00016234095,0.0007495334,0.0025697253,0.00011555041,0.00015913502,0.00043123326,0.0000027193496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022555092,0.00020393636,0.0016592098,0.000025235464,0.00004620212,0.00011803039,0.062559575,0.000044456065,0.00020372127,0.93275034,0.002260268,0.00010644194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035689555,0.0004253995,0.013486936,0.00087013823,0.00037227923,0.00009984524,0.11784738,0.00006300483,0.06296264,0.098881386,0.6999867,0.001435314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4758624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9411772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.833869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017960362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011763708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217014753","doi":"10.1017/s0008423921000858","title":"Decolonizing Authority: The Conflict on Wet'suwet’en Territory","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Indigenous; Legal pluralism; Politics; Colonialism; Political science; Traditional authority; Corporate governance; Decolonization; Political authority; Law; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Political economy; Law and economics; Epistemology; Comparative law; Geography; Legal realism","score_opus":0.03716939979351979,"score_gpt":0.34432353547953864,"score_spread":0.30715413568601885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217014753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52975565,0.0010319762,0.00010944307,0.120396316,0.0064749476,0.00018979456,0.000032964872,0.000025415924,0.34198353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99455327,0.0000040362324,0.0003214781,0.0026923153,0.0012210037,9.687784e-7,1.3665611e-7,0.0000061587234,0.0012006107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696594,0.00037786431,0.000282902,0.00019143148,0.00086499436,0.0013168498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99575967,0.00064570573,0.00008858455,0.00023323848,0.0004921197,0.0027806778],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033323213,0.00009180146,0.00016249348,0.00015962598,0.001590105,0.0004895245,0.0011848869,0.00008865135,0.00040659556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00929798,0.00006841045,0.00009448133,0.00074026914,0.0033082673,0.00034293882,0.00004333567,0.0005293447,0.00007315302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012720951,0.000008528512,0.0029351367,0.0000014957018,0.0000045687934,0.000320215,0.01711984,0.0000038619655,0.00005773965,0.97745115,0.0014163407,0.0006798551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014080465,0.000091220136,0.05127499,0.000065747496,0.000022307115,0.00006689769,0.01459813,0.000024795867,0.00069304876,0.009882599,0.9229597,0.0001797953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060168877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11437771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9675685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015301643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014751116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217764329","doi":"10.59952/tuj.v2i1.34","title":"The impact of single window system on customs administration at Victoria falls border post in Zambia","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Revenue; The Internet; Trade facilitation; Information and Communications Technology; Government (linguistics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Business; Implementation; Geography; Engineering; Finance; International trade; Free trade; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.012352028263512655,"score_gpt":0.2853515881729626,"score_spread":0.2729995599094499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217764329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93772376,0.00010257154,0.000011582214,0.0010601772,0.00037904707,0.00007632988,0.000010179968,0.000011246896,0.060625136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962065,0.000021176182,0.000016372644,0.00001052027,0.00016066468,3.661476e-8,9.407732e-7,0.0000036943115,0.0035800545],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986537,0.0005779395,0.00012377069,0.00007998393,0.0003592641,0.00020530383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991221,0.00024832354,0.00016265409,0.0001528674,0.00023141842,0.000082673105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006781755,0.000064138294,0.00010364772,0.000039912717,0.0011491372,0.00009167967,0.0003768526,0.00006250816,0.00013927436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017931304,0.000041739346,0.00010777495,0.00033627846,0.00021057761,0.00015444748,0.00006323841,0.00023227888,0.000028691102],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004021843,0.00091018114,0.047516227,0.000037324513,0.0004992778,0.0023226014,0.8557827,0.0021783148,0.018562464,0.058348272,0.006260406,0.0035603838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036150026,0.0015154126,0.10791325,0.00042967527,0.00019865728,0.00025626432,0.5638531,0.00014582109,0.003633924,0.0005072894,0.317292,0.0006395848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005861726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027313603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3110316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012549342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048509557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.883835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W35489204","doi":"10.29173/alr62","title":"Mitigation, Specific Performance, and the Property Developer: &lt;i&gt;Southcott Estates Inc. v. Toronto Catholic District School Board&lt;/i&gt;","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Business; Law; Management; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01124517219457759,"score_gpt":0.24797532339761671,"score_spread":0.2367301512030391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W35489204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036202822,0.3276665,0.000004805557,0.009099575,0.00042178755,0.0036422403,0.000011382462,0.00011478305,0.6228361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7384485,0.23437877,0.00055363815,0.0024211318,0.00035643778,0.00066762057,0.00003352671,0.000043893666,0.023096457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968907,0.0006409504,0.0006870823,0.0005122772,0.0006320571,0.0006369089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978198,0.0004927727,0.00024794045,0.00068664976,0.00037836836,0.00037446522],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012013627,0.00034304181,0.00061558984,0.000019378102,0.0011866479,0.00042979373,0.0008237523,0.00013199153,0.0021830092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009209551,0.00018484543,0.00012264316,0.000448832,0.0014047496,0.0012650692,0.00021141,0.00021790479,0.0025284244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050021103,0.00020516776,0.0072734044,0.0031241837,0.00022857194,0.000008054518,0.14930174,0.0000016027719,0.0000956263,0.49279147,0.2243315,0.122588664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003379681,0.000021825595,0.0017765492,0.00068965193,0.00007922114,0.000003569416,0.00016422303,0.000014712278,0.0000065752515,0.00013652655,0.99642324,0.0003459268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03805392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03093484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77209175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025374914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022175937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W354984725","doi":"","title":"The diary of Sarah, Lady Cowper","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Pickering & Chatto eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Majesty; Duty; Poor relief; Greenwich; History; Corporation; Political science; Classics; Sociology; Poverty","score_opus":0.021061243128608253,"score_gpt":0.29145097824324806,"score_spread":0.2703897351146398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W354984725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014897886,0.0034067107,0.00002224018,0.00025200928,0.00081602327,0.0005236905,0.000014452977,0.00016924959,0.99464667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.046949085,0.00021546078,0.0001413573,0.00020858772,0.0015327251,0.0000314067,0.0000072512785,0.000062839834,0.95085126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972955,0.00022209935,0.000499702,0.00040044566,0.0009335249,0.0006487251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978914,0.00063359697,0.00038444402,0.0007471976,0.00016179316,0.00018152452],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012185436,0.00033557304,0.0004990373,0.000087860484,0.00077256205,0.0001543632,0.0011652374,0.00046951653,0.00009457659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030301602,0.00027405427,0.00025987127,0.000052786563,0.0012131325,0.0000643364,0.00021457646,0.0006342063,0.0001915999],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007568947,0.000058315047,0.0003220929,0.00018785667,0.000337216,0.00009197166,0.29679227,0.0000076086694,0.00006553393,0.43427902,0.095163345,0.17261907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010930854,0.00003577509,0.00006139469,0.00018067678,0.00004820994,6.451998e-7,0.000479781,0.0000018343493,0.000052754684,0.012255523,0.9864708,0.00030327283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004303516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007936418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8913075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003429289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007788438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W38316102","doi":"10.1016/j.jelekin.2024.102865","title":"The prevention of HIV transmission from mother-to-child : the obligations of the South African government in terms of national and international laws","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nova Scotia Health Research Foundation","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Transmission (telecommunications); Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Medicine; Virology; Engineering; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.011125025305814907,"score_gpt":0.29568205595804403,"score_spread":0.28455703065222915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W38316102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44206166,0.00021772912,0.00021845991,0.008111549,0.0010151839,0.0015122618,0.0005952365,0.000015132942,0.5462528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849019,0.000033085253,0.00031013676,0.000023109342,0.000083419276,0.000035461333,0.0000354202,0.000010030376,0.014567414],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782187,0.00018567251,0.00045978764,0.00017569451,0.0012486062,0.000108380475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876374,0.00035512654,0.0005051891,0.00019700594,0.00014446236,0.000034498895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069458573,0.00011005022,0.00015993834,0.000042341257,0.0002475472,0.000035013265,0.0007137399,0.00015314562,0.00023994813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036264132,0.00005804503,0.00011140507,0.00026419852,0.00028253693,0.000074694246,0.00004339717,0.00025711022,0.0000016116587],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027091784,0.00033409824,0.013707794,0.000047659414,0.0002019909,1.1954292e-7,0.8002408,0.00010843677,0.0043658945,0.16051377,0.00064998074,0.019558508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001683055,0.00013940259,0.39010695,0.0014610498,0.00022971841,2.9899914e-7,0.21895367,0.0006545354,0.019436697,0.14211093,0.22456625,0.00065745425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010418798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010742187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58128715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008289798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013751353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5994392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200031576","doi":"10.1002/iir.1442","title":"<i>Sequana I</i>: Struggling with section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Appeal; Section (typography); Law; Relation (database); Norm (philosophy); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Advertising","score_opus":0.025393993595580186,"score_gpt":0.3326100410917249,"score_spread":0.3072160474961447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200031576","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02319348,0.19833042,0.00090401684,0.01787734,0.0076846085,0.0012071066,0.00008616881,0.0001750327,0.7505418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96957415,0.02466631,0.00074079336,0.0011177034,0.00058771356,0.00003490936,0.00001317827,0.000018325794,0.0032468932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978523,0.00027380083,0.00044776525,0.00027324967,0.0009384518,0.00021439274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845546,0.00013275367,0.00033194688,0.00036404736,0.0006466081,0.00006917024],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057515583,0.00013419424,0.00025995832,0.000040568742,0.00022925963,0.000053443702,0.00072231656,0.000072162606,0.0010276111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094902364,0.00009621036,0.00019326077,0.00076566817,0.00022107614,0.00033581487,0.00012920369,0.00026977138,0.00003832344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013738158,0.0018992166,0.1491365,0.0060168235,0.001533706,0.00024305661,0.08565646,0.0002901947,0.004027583,0.5406552,0.028665114,0.1817388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015430419,0.000023430171,0.0011280036,0.0033811668,0.00005935955,0.0000078457915,0.00034194603,0.000010594539,0.00057679205,0.0009295525,0.99323344,0.00015353895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005453318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008089988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9645684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016911243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050792214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205269872","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198866220.001.0001","title":"Human Rights Litigation against Multinationals in Practice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Jurisdiction; Liability; Damages; Settlement (finance); Complicity; Harm; Relevance (law); Law; Business; Law and economics; Sociology; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.026085288513798977,"score_gpt":0.2932285839222297,"score_spread":0.26714329540843074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205269872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018207074,0.00010477553,0.000016229504,0.00009984887,0.00023486734,0.00046359876,0.000058313442,0.00010553246,0.9987348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005745941,0.000033995442,0.0007921128,0.0000863004,0.00032020328,0.0000021285282,0.0001438729,0.000019490199,0.99285597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977127,0.0005465182,0.00022465424,0.00046258688,0.00071981066,0.00033372894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983662,0.00035088355,0.0003440036,0.00031708003,0.0004752638,0.0001465731],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004808094,0.00021326254,0.00028870298,0.00020515423,0.0008549554,0.00013084176,0.00059543346,0.0005455419,0.000051417584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018643426,0.0002787977,0.000122035424,0.000054447963,0.0004005459,0.00043412737,0.0002431307,0.00059552095,0.000003236137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000126970435,0.000043323034,0.000006381531,0.000027359254,0.000055793545,0.00033779183,0.02980205,0.000013415609,0.0000032380258,0.9630008,0.0061804745,0.0005167017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003809027,0.000011450602,0.000008952994,0.00017909722,0.00006913546,3.092867e-7,0.0011352088,0.000007567447,0.000017333761,0.0014521335,0.9964406,0.00029730462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019348564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027187637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9902601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012714997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061615935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206208231","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2015/v18i6a1117","title":"Editorial","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Democracy; Sociology; Political science; Safeguarding; Multiculturalism; Legal education; Politics","score_opus":0.009911963621447422,"score_gpt":0.3101963665386608,"score_spread":0.30028440291721337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206208231","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000042259468,0.03353723,0.00017301795,0.0016025034,0.85895956,0.0013684554,0.00029862998,0.0011923589,0.10282599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008087146,0.009559618,0.00060347543,0.00012864497,0.95757663,0.00026032078,0.0005515571,0.0009181384,0.022314453],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9655618,0.0039083315,0.003387099,0.0027985002,0.014833058,0.009511175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97946846,0.0028815616,0.0036537948,0.0029780115,0.0071413377,0.0038768523],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015746338,0.0029539126,0.0037728064,0.00090282405,0.0053771464,0.0035820953,0.0072284313,0.007914745,0.000985266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012723702,0.0029997183,0.0020750803,0.0020569349,0.0032102687,0.0027751648,0.0010075395,0.023240505,0.001727175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007399681,0.00037155004,0.000006093621,0.00008828688,0.001373903,0.00015824795,0.011978156,0.00005502282,0.000019276362,0.023377454,0.9601754,0.0016566543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038844822,0.0012735159,1.435054e-7,0.00033456515,0.0011028121,0.00004079392,0.0037992918,0.00000814746,0.000037222497,0.026368227,0.96037084,0.0027799457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0117732305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0266603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0986171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02256025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03351862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206497214","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-84647-3_29","title":"Article 31: The Rights to Rest, Play, Recreation, and Cultural and Artistic Activities","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Children's well-being","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Recreation; Rest (music); Competition (biology); Aesthetics; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Art; Law; Medicine; Philosophy; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.012219610784861985,"score_gpt":0.2665343865141429,"score_spread":0.2543147757292809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206497214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08399163,0.000953562,0.000009145532,0.0016093607,0.00029451773,0.00064677995,0.000027375005,0.00010858942,0.91235906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.761019,0.00025410415,0.0001507298,0.00025834164,0.0007530265,0.000026902677,0.000019550374,0.000030830757,0.23748751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836475,0.00011076031,0.00023599369,0.000457042,0.0004847142,0.0003467476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898016,0.00036259784,0.00013283014,0.0002865556,0.000045033998,0.0001928284],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038135928,0.0002552731,0.00027077162,0.0000817084,0.0020873267,0.00035672347,0.0002909055,0.00015454026,0.00059269654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014462041,0.0001961228,0.00005800834,0.000084287254,0.00063368987,0.00026817943,0.00027128035,0.0004644438,0.000064082946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023519717,0.000008155588,0.0007455429,0.000008523289,0.00007375209,0.000017997476,0.12900598,0.000007952025,0.000010344239,0.8622891,0.006731206,0.0010779402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002065932,0.000068009744,0.0032108524,0.00011775832,0.00015025478,0.000014094128,0.0016282188,0.000006760714,0.0000495486,0.10610281,0.8879219,0.00052316353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014552744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054942403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8811907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015573516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006190092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99921185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206745800","doi":"10.1080/02582473.2021.2004215","title":"<i>Land, Law and Chiefs in Rural South Africa: Contested Histories and Current Struggles</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Historical Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Land rights; Land law; Law; Gender studies; Land tenure; Ethnology; Geography; History; Sociology; Archaeology; Agriculture","score_opus":0.022505975903520627,"score_gpt":0.2577970278198587,"score_spread":0.23529105191633806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206745800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59769034,0.19583784,0.00049731776,0.009469548,0.021672722,0.002579822,0.00067140267,0.0008706157,0.17071037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974414,0.0000722941,0.00023089047,0.00015586992,0.0007050886,0.000044762794,0.0000032307323,0.000036919737,0.0013095355],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995852,0.0008637663,0.00067434035,0.0004548988,0.0012450814,0.00090989785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981721,0.00025300076,0.00042549142,0.00023515348,0.0001288903,0.0007853634],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013534942,0.0003171363,0.00058659003,0.00031391444,0.0021313769,0.00022608184,0.00053940306,0.000106867614,0.00015739468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046749949,0.0003122524,0.00012904542,0.00088428386,0.0007852413,0.00030973522,0.0003624792,0.0016170635,0.0000068377212],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022236201,0.00016591237,0.047912717,0.000017246497,0.000027155897,0.00013440475,0.9264162,0.000012442402,0.000014339848,0.020803977,0.0022027406,0.0020704805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001229678,0.00022884842,0.0005814625,0.00001930544,0.0000485124,0.000035992012,0.060905144,0.000013992523,6.341548e-7,0.0022217634,0.93427277,0.0004419296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011436747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035424152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038692874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003634044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206757867","doi":"10.1017/9781108283618.010","title":"Remedies for Violations of Indigenous Rights","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Indigenous; Political science; Duty; Interim; Law and economics; Law; Declaration; Sociology","score_opus":0.03424107778291943,"score_gpt":0.25700268139465404,"score_spread":0.2227616036117346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206757867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015062853,0.00054920366,0.00034857457,0.000013919663,0.00042379336,0.0006722743,0.0005454185,0.00008289717,0.9972133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007886357,0.00006894185,0.00058640214,0.000012818365,0.00030101373,0.000001456432,0.00006018714,0.000022645836,0.9910602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876016,0.000058523117,0.00019755847,0.00033629453,0.00036645084,0.0002810047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839646,0.00024020886,0.00028554237,0.00037152096,0.0005645868,0.00014168456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001662582,0.00019846665,0.00039213267,0.0001400667,0.00070581544,0.000032921223,0.00051918376,0.0004204863,0.000013893428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058327943,0.00024024029,0.00025957337,0.0000149417,0.0006968702,0.00008363553,0.0001778844,0.00023463792,0.0000045808456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024830257,0.000008311542,0.000002970868,0.0000535233,0.000122061116,0.00003938682,0.013784017,6.18131e-7,0.000009461408,0.97905064,0.006679837,0.00022432033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022013484,0.000029209663,0.0000027445503,0.00012220716,0.00021593073,3.98003e-7,0.00051027554,0.0000018124438,0.00018102833,0.00021974313,0.998252,0.00024452584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002004356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025408724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99157214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002545732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041560718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9796715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206809556","doi":"10.47348/samlj/v33/i2a2","title":"Investigating the Need to Introduce Compulsory Interest Arbitration as a Method to Prevent Lengthy Strikes in South Africa","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Mercantile Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Harm; Order (exchange); Compulsory arbitration; Political science; Action (physics); Law; Business","score_opus":0.040935064742647874,"score_gpt":0.32856749089509674,"score_spread":0.2876324261524489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206809556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70324206,0.0016606787,0.010166193,0.041445587,0.0031993762,0.0025265676,0.00011862662,0.0003281203,0.23731276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96941644,0.0000041087483,0.025687592,0.002550298,0.0014469886,0.000052365125,0.000003442113,0.000049931405,0.0007888125],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931809,0.0028359897,0.0009610333,0.0006920299,0.0011943848,0.0011356827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969646,0.0005274014,0.00042235377,0.0005712766,0.0005073097,0.0010070693],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042985897,0.00036123008,0.00057353044,0.0002872168,0.0015819639,0.00089140795,0.0011775815,0.00016519827,0.00035011466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037031388,0.00030323918,0.00022234167,0.0025842784,0.00039923,0.00034687176,0.00031862158,0.0013718181,0.00021554317],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049646107,0.00012755259,0.00080767955,0.000012103749,0.000067698675,0.00008063645,0.9335739,0.0008918945,0.0014826736,0.059601773,0.00068125216,0.0026231986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067098124,0.0002834275,0.00052123435,0.0003355437,0.000119969256,0.000036800087,0.67780393,0.00016326498,0.0042277225,0.009989771,0.3050272,0.0008201513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016707169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005485889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30434594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048438745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010342731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4207014272","doi":"10.1177/00420980211065895","title":"Making Mangaung Metro: The politics of metropolitan reform in a South African secondary city","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Urban Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metropolitan area; Politics; Corporate governance; Economic growth; Public administration; Political science; Local government; Government (linguistics); Urbanization; Municipal services; Business; Geography; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.08052264952683977,"score_gpt":0.3594413239580355,"score_spread":0.2789186744311958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4207014272","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37778047,0.036871508,0.000007809428,0.002985862,0.0008409604,0.0005320883,0.00018078336,0.00010825741,0.5806923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951863,0.000017899667,0.00023259729,0.0002215257,0.00021467406,0.00006356032,0.0000010431734,0.000013934572,0.0040484373],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977196,0.0004642674,0.00034958989,0.00023379645,0.0007011504,0.0005316179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990071,0.00032481254,0.00020248783,0.00031598104,0.00010187326,0.00004775089],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015174706,0.00013420005,0.00034935196,0.0001868662,0.0014247723,0.000026417352,0.000600092,0.00003229209,0.00016605505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006148361,0.000101955986,0.00011053017,0.0010649972,0.0009469305,0.00009510775,0.0007275164,0.0004088936,0.0000043402865],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012313312,0.000041593852,0.05684011,0.000021359307,0.00012915493,0.000011979642,0.7412272,0.0000028727227,0.000002268062,0.20016417,0.0013787383,0.0001682469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015528318,0.000059231916,0.0035971429,0.000010284844,0.000037370453,2.5836218e-7,0.84819853,0.0000038010323,0.000016268395,0.0074149477,0.14037766,0.00012923547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045268806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028076083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6174059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027838028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015197662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211191022","doi":"10.1002/iir.1243","title":"Various Aspects to Consider with Regard to Special Insolvency Rules for Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprises in South Africa","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Business; Small and medium-sized enterprises; Industrial organization; Finance","score_opus":0.07918310268532958,"score_gpt":0.3542193387217083,"score_spread":0.2750362360363787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211191022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060913444,0.10681436,0.0053718584,0.0773206,0.007998048,0.0135193365,0.0005767665,0.00047596105,0.72700965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94727993,0.0036696277,0.03497621,0.005993183,0.0032107239,0.001013472,0.0000346428,0.000078227145,0.0037439945],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975303,0.00017932072,0.0005646439,0.0005315904,0.00074947695,0.00044468444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810594,0.0002899554,0.00023185552,0.0002571873,0.0006280905,0.00048698785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001143482,0.0002462731,0.00052315596,0.00022461236,0.000113906266,0.00016164526,0.0006734633,0.00009178025,0.0002105166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052921423,0.00021069722,0.00009079558,0.00044509396,0.00016603225,0.00025350746,0.00019301809,0.00017478265,0.00018896793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014746011,0.0009878842,0.03750647,0.0011393316,0.00042571055,0.00039379593,0.721562,0.00004400189,0.000045941444,0.13215569,0.08155883,0.022705685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084986526,0.00023722422,0.0009360461,0.0019872363,0.00004718313,0.0000044407184,0.0011276336,0.0000031790887,0.000010829782,0.006447967,0.9880186,0.00032980012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037644693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033380399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90645975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003508152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065055396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8591984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212773880","doi":"10.1002/div.1774","title":"Ranking the 2004 Canadian Dividend Achievers","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mergent s Dividend Achievers","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dividend; Ranking (information retrieval); Citation; Business; Information retrieval; Library science; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.020661979960902684,"score_gpt":0.2942131860790036,"score_spread":0.2735512061181009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212773880","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28742412,0.010683014,0.000382959,0.1773704,0.010058285,0.002346367,0.00019858578,0.0008235877,0.5107127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816154,0.00021534257,0.00037938426,0.002671763,0.0015729544,0.000037090416,0.000012936727,0.000045661756,0.013449461],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957875,0.000525147,0.0004332216,0.0005474378,0.0012760406,0.0014306605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979602,0.0002803524,0.00016518604,0.0006534063,0.00009868542,0.00084217574],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001911964,0.00033351622,0.00028901838,0.00022185553,0.0027488302,0.0003389574,0.0016349546,0.00021265841,0.0040637488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007138825,0.00027590382,0.0002713259,0.0008435702,0.00067326066,0.000810245,0.00017479606,0.00058309635,0.0018933647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000872041,0.00021335843,0.11637197,0.000032752912,0.0005887289,0.000115740186,0.38427645,0.0035098034,0.00019098404,0.05221706,0.39759633,0.04479965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030804437,0.00001713105,0.0038228205,0.00002545083,0.00008151934,0.0000010484855,0.004648312,0.000038732567,0.00006836725,0.00037393163,0.990232,0.00038268056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30452043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60028464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6941913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011254887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006884948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212904494","doi":"10.1515/npf-2021-0049","title":"Challenges to Nonprofit Organization Participation in Social and Development Policy Planning in South Africa","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nonprofit Policy Forum","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Sustainable development; Economic growth; Corporate governance; Political science; Public administration; Social Welfare; Democracy; Public relations; Business; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.08316715712304859,"score_gpt":0.38095033560214925,"score_spread":0.29778317847910063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212904494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91105014,0.00050976523,0.00008811516,0.03697571,0.00021348921,0.0011558718,0.00002663191,0.00018384421,0.049796406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99745667,0.000007166777,0.00045480623,0.0006190089,0.00046464655,0.00027028724,0.000011751824,0.00003479923,0.0006808354],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974062,0.00030196935,0.00039073735,0.00041429716,0.00058000395,0.0009067941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943316,0.00006792867,0.00012155988,0.00013886322,0.00006523035,0.0001732606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092345185,0.00017303064,0.00024030409,0.0007933576,0.0010385291,0.00007687208,0.00032140972,0.00011793162,0.00006575686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007626568,0.000206868,0.000020031774,0.0023575001,0.000091922775,0.00021543883,0.00044965866,0.00027470218,0.000046865414],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025464036,0.00005832921,0.092275485,0.000013267942,0.0000058289897,0.000006542942,0.8520467,0.00012832413,0.000028446348,0.049531218,0.0001443114,0.005736043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016382807,0.00018819075,0.3626033,0.00005258637,0.000010238376,0.0000012385093,0.24857257,0.000065312306,0.0003065593,0.004852129,0.3807621,0.0009475077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026595388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019766383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6034742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012317087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008909158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8435833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220654244","doi":"10.1163/17087384-bja10064","title":"Habeas Corpus as a Remedy for Deprivation of the Right to Personal Liberty: Contemporary Developments in Lesotho","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Habeas corpus; Writ; Law; Political science; Enforcement; Constitutional right; Judicial review; Constitution","score_opus":0.055753344791364075,"score_gpt":0.34171092834650907,"score_spread":0.285957583555145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220654244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9192939,0.008602622,0.00013189815,0.028930446,0.0020805972,0.0011438443,0.00004079628,0.000019492769,0.039756447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99675,0.000021434285,0.0009993338,0.0004299809,0.00015027192,0.000047354053,3.812086e-7,0.000011708599,0.0015895201],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764097,0.00039666635,0.00058885687,0.0001502651,0.0009590034,0.00026421825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842775,0.00044940982,0.00058488647,0.00009668071,0.0003495488,0.00009171913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018100891,0.00011650268,0.0003776001,0.00016082102,0.00072252343,0.000030511106,0.00059235917,0.00002746772,0.000026088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017678096,0.00008500311,0.0001447575,0.00080676295,0.00024599084,0.00022484516,0.00027315988,0.00026423598,0.0000016334028],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007787372,0.00028363708,0.10810866,0.00003191157,0.00044008752,0.00008011862,0.851456,0.0000721534,0.00038060636,0.019248268,0.016419737,0.0027000818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008108434,0.00039598034,0.007175223,0.000080098835,0.00003090953,0.000009762138,0.07114481,0.000003092183,0.00034543907,0.0028388004,0.9170054,0.00015962638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055243156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048750022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90058565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005458284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008547659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55571395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220911915","doi":"10.1163/17087384-bja10063","title":"A Future of Justice Inclusion: Examining Access to Justice in South Africa through the ‘Ethic of Care’ and ‘Complexity’","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Concreteness; Economic Justice; Inclusion (mineral); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.12882707152831185,"score_gpt":0.38936405628928,"score_spread":0.26053698476096815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220911915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7386401,0.16489668,0.00016948336,0.029258417,0.004224933,0.0010013949,0.00017381489,0.000035509805,0.06159965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997065,0.00038998085,0.0015350669,0.0002493422,0.0006316014,0.000014070805,1.9361983e-7,0.00001353258,0.000101230115],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99638087,0.00094892783,0.00076673663,0.0002120684,0.001320449,0.000370933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99697846,0.001182494,0.00085858547,0.00020675291,0.0006689166,0.000104810635],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00222513,0.00017450548,0.0006605732,0.00019255851,0.0017499598,0.000046089026,0.0012379225,0.000048949427,0.00003592896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018047044,0.00012717227,0.000098182514,0.0016370262,0.0010320548,0.00040571092,0.0028699362,0.000707899,4.6264358e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020011772,0.000051579034,0.0007962883,0.00014895484,0.00010147072,0.000044900673,0.986447,0.00040071472,0.000026013795,0.010079092,0.0008978213,0.0008060463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033330396,0.00060320273,0.00062218535,0.00009019215,0.00030770618,0.0000056627937,0.81387407,0.0000021906149,0.000018953218,0.0015212361,0.18249887,0.00012243736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049921277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048621016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25842488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025624727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033491763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221075346","doi":"10.1163/17087384-bja10062","title":"The Imperative of Engendering an Egalitarian Legal Framework for the Protection of Female Employees’ Rights in Nigeria","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Convention; Law; Political science; Linguistic rights; Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women; Declaration; Constitution; Right to property; International law; Charter; Remuneration; Fundamental rights","score_opus":0.06608425698013083,"score_gpt":0.3746722905388958,"score_spread":0.30858803355876496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221075346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.974987,0.010208287,0.0013844995,0.006547724,0.0023889786,0.0013951401,0.000037153764,0.000020470205,0.0030307951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980716,0.00006643132,0.0011365057,0.000015999809,0.00041724707,0.00009941961,1.4488198e-7,0.000010643685,0.00018199116],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972059,0.0008803251,0.00070331024,0.00014858898,0.0007349878,0.0003269017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997115,0.0013629503,0.00074959185,0.00020380394,0.00050719903,0.00006144539],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003395621,0.00013541257,0.00041853657,0.000104390725,0.002245335,0.000066597575,0.0007015442,0.00004333822,0.000016271264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014834631,0.00008075963,0.00018128123,0.0006445726,0.0008197153,0.00038651784,0.00015084386,0.0005705998,2.0315366e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054450484,0.00017550231,0.0014089253,0.000019635765,0.00048426667,0.0000141641995,0.82368475,0.00079104747,0.00023517052,0.1712385,0.00014454756,0.0012589965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005152483,0.0019036438,0.0010394518,0.00006134306,0.00008053148,0.000006994665,0.76283807,0.000021422693,0.00083096285,0.022672523,0.20984578,0.00018402986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002900228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052434676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20970123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030248487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027209308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224863990","doi":"10.1163/17087384-bja10065","title":"Zimbabwe’s Contribution to the Transnational Judicial Dialogue on Corporal Punishment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporal punishment; Human rights; Law; Commonwealth; Political science; Jurisprudence; Norm (philosophy); Victory; International law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.0418768195586337,"score_gpt":0.3361045951574651,"score_spread":0.2942277755988314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224863990","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3698432,0.0045003453,0.00051207753,0.5809619,0.010251719,0.0013147324,0.0002886948,0.00007978733,0.032247547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971236,0.0000293428,0.00010757217,0.0012814298,0.00096980546,0.000040196668,0.0000021806666,0.000009008338,0.0004368908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967209,0.00068632583,0.00045848466,0.00014997298,0.0016296548,0.00035466193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983415,0.00048153292,0.00037496697,0.00010991823,0.0005417104,0.000150392],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002514088,0.00012964004,0.0003187637,0.00013288438,0.0020424621,0.000077781886,0.0006087153,0.000025021522,0.0001258782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086524937,0.000093083465,0.00017391791,0.0006413619,0.00038401718,0.0001666845,0.00012821514,0.0004711909,0.000010786794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005365337,0.00022630901,0.0010906481,0.0000021174267,0.00032556048,0.00011632453,0.17128813,0.001627828,0.000031114923,0.7862101,0.037037272,0.0015080257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047812687,0.0009121479,0.0012250603,0.000006682948,0.00006065682,0.000008134386,0.032055452,0.000002744929,0.000025493966,0.0054382524,0.9596627,0.00012457056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014603313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004260288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9226254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008513586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032477785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99925673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229954982","doi":"10.1002/div.1347","title":"Great‐West Lifeco Inc.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mergent s Dividend Achievers","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reinsurance; Life insurance; Business; Health insurance; Financial services; Finance; West virginia; Actuarial science; Economic growth; Economics; Geography; Health care","score_opus":0.025619022424710026,"score_gpt":0.3062733998175411,"score_spread":0.28065437739283106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229954982","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63796103,0.0024512105,0.00075136434,0.024639115,0.0077966894,0.0010112375,0.00007912352,0.0010442331,0.324266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940274,0.0001642534,0.00067243946,0.0005456247,0.00068172446,0.000020910109,0.000011919411,0.000025085761,0.0038506698],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997833,0.00015110325,0.00026009002,0.00036354424,0.0007678772,0.0006243917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990668,0.00006841073,0.00009815125,0.00033247191,0.000053690455,0.00038045718],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005773007,0.00018773408,0.00020285176,0.00009893216,0.0007443351,0.0001154183,0.00062725623,0.00013885275,0.0028534967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036568032,0.00018545598,0.00012744022,0.00046968815,0.00037817558,0.00045439636,0.00014894729,0.00023444556,0.0031711506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115772345,0.000800237,0.17016563,0.00007231614,0.00042086988,0.00031418834,0.40376028,0.0017050379,0.00048524147,0.36207938,0.04832424,0.011756801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000503312,0.000050104085,0.005447474,0.000025730227,0.000045672492,6.462801e-7,0.0020937636,0.0000016311574,0.00019543046,0.004452331,0.98684454,0.00033935756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008310439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028006274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9385203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003259497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230248784","doi":"10.20474/jahss-2.3.3","title":"Animals: ‘objects’ or ‘sentient beings’? A comparative perspective of the South African law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Environmental ethics; Law; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08617310543616923,"score_gpt":0.3768089567178542,"score_spread":0.29063585128168495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230248784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6228622,0.010132777,0.000029435978,0.00302277,0.0012027832,0.00033504918,0.00002599044,0.000015609105,0.36237335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99859047,0.0004173114,0.00018370684,0.00010304508,0.00035811638,0.0000024868134,1.1724803e-8,0.000003678208,0.00034119526],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795324,0.00034037512,0.00041770612,0.0001628652,0.00081569,0.00031010763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984005,0.00045959614,0.0006973458,0.000056376964,0.00035131574,0.0000348719],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012067168,0.00011165171,0.00034383876,0.000106354535,0.0012723111,0.00011367828,0.0005982993,0.000048472826,0.00007115187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028966265,0.000054893288,0.00011055472,0.00044443208,0.00715683,0.0008883259,0.000104688224,0.00014336291,6.7281604e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005309782,0.000027592547,0.0019607546,0.0000057972147,0.000008915909,0.0000024185256,0.5534039,0.000003132949,0.000026433092,0.4442289,0.000025319023,0.0002537527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036273367,0.0003609629,0.0010209408,0.0001350268,0.000018528404,0.0000017221187,0.8609893,0.0000010733276,0.00011788202,0.05580833,0.081054,0.00012952612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006884016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007854794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38842055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000199333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028358173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99554515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233694023","doi":"10.7202/1021949ar","title":"Renonciation aux représailles et recours en dommages","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03129338562044258,"score_gpt":0.3297596516628757,"score_spread":0.2984662660424331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233694023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036179654,0.012233187,0.0033316263,0.16262609,0.00433192,0.00054924964,0.00007423253,0.00032529252,0.7803488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74111694,0.0010921896,0.0031722516,0.00034168514,0.001691126,0.000023999515,0.000038511393,0.00003906249,0.25248426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99580514,0.001892334,0.0005998467,0.0005141276,0.0006362231,0.00055231573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963861,0.002152543,0.00038240588,0.00057094864,0.00027037182,0.00023759474],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026183068,0.00027607402,0.00031380696,0.00018888272,0.0010530879,0.0002044121,0.0004671641,0.0011506196,0.0020230727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005744926,0.00030736477,0.00015112746,0.0013397648,0.0007462376,0.00081903837,0.00013141474,0.0011197807,0.0023723159],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009303244,0.00012113944,0.011547362,0.000004998517,0.00008076502,0.0000042990728,0.097578675,0.001764197,0.000009609914,0.6435982,0.12362463,0.12165684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028863785,0.00006762564,0.0021095283,0.00014603195,0.00011451822,0.0000019026477,0.006691338,0.00070651405,0.00004504795,0.013363291,0.9761182,0.0003473313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002224111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005159697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8524936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042876494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006988283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234293503","doi":"10.1177/002071520004100107","title":"Democratic Local Government and Responsiveness: Lessons from Zimbabwe and Tanzania","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Comparative Sociology","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tanzania; Democracy; Local government; Political science; Government (linguistics); Development economics; Economic growth; Public administration; Socioeconomics; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.03747424124821119,"score_gpt":0.3817108811857446,"score_spread":0.3442366399375334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234293503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9750913,0.002391164,0.0013029403,0.009171042,0.00047281137,0.00006933892,0.000039709623,0.000007255355,0.011454474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969784,0.00039966882,0.0008653693,0.00046802792,0.00044193253,0.0000022344223,0.0000014801639,0.000004469421,0.0008384026],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982899,0.00060348783,0.00031954382,0.0001374433,0.0005009015,0.00014873323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839103,0.0009653757,0.00022505964,0.000051632906,0.00025064673,0.00011625604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004679149,0.000097331904,0.00027575434,0.000036374622,0.00016632823,0.00004986159,0.0002995394,0.00009809189,0.0006727296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013705732,0.00008551161,0.000050467424,0.000038477036,0.0014617661,0.0002127286,0.00004944051,0.0002421102,0.000020422041],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026629854,0.0003095727,0.026853086,0.0000047114236,0.0013881687,0.00036825327,0.77428246,0.00033745234,0.0013446735,0.13742673,0.008087974,0.046933923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035173316,0.00066154514,0.116345234,0.00014300617,0.00013874861,0.00008387779,0.06693589,0.00051343674,0.00048771754,0.25689244,0.5537917,0.0004890546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019098251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016367585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70734656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021126626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013768092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73659176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235019799","doi":"10.1002/div.1728","title":"Great‐West Lifeco Inc.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mergent s Dividend Achievers","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reinsurance; Life insurance; Business; Health insurance; Financial services; Finance; Actuarial science; Economic growth; Economics; Health care","score_opus":0.025619022424710026,"score_gpt":0.3062733998175411,"score_spread":0.28065437739283106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235019799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63796103,0.0024512105,0.00075136434,0.024639115,0.0077966894,0.0010112375,0.00007912352,0.0010442331,0.324266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940274,0.0001642534,0.00067243946,0.0005456247,0.00068172446,0.000020910109,0.000011919411,0.000025085761,0.0038506698],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997833,0.00015110325,0.00026009002,0.00036354424,0.0007678772,0.0006243917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990668,0.00006841073,0.00009815125,0.00033247191,0.000053690455,0.00038045718],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005773007,0.00018773408,0.00020285176,0.00009893216,0.0007443351,0.0001154183,0.00062725623,0.00013885275,0.0028534967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036568032,0.00018545598,0.00012744022,0.00046968815,0.00037817558,0.00045439636,0.00014894729,0.00023444556,0.0031711506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115772345,0.000800237,0.17016563,0.00007231614,0.00042086988,0.00031418834,0.40376028,0.0017050379,0.00048524147,0.36207938,0.04832424,0.011756801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000503312,0.000050104085,0.005447474,0.000025730227,0.000045672492,6.462801e-7,0.0020937636,0.0000016311574,0.00019543046,0.004452331,0.98684454,0.00033935756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008310439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028006274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9385203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003259497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235400449","doi":"10.1787/fin_sme_ent-2018-48-en","title":"South Africa","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Financing SMEs and entrepreneurs","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Accommodation; Geography; Agricultural economics; Business; Retail trade; Socioeconomics; Economics; Commerce; Archaeology","score_opus":0.026105041955087477,"score_gpt":0.2561022490330542,"score_spread":0.2299972070779667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235400449","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012498375,0.0043805595,0.000019106992,0.00027497584,0.0009859644,0.00020461436,0.00005254975,0.0001810917,0.9926513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15763766,0.0004533652,0.00022059647,0.00007943558,0.0012265159,0.000005826572,0.000007731285,0.000049921626,0.840319],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982133,0.000032668497,0.00026035236,0.00059229875,0.000419358,0.00048204942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990106,0.000082890976,0.00021113193,0.00040699902,0.000099128796,0.00018923677],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025779384,0.000295651,0.00036758938,0.00009987662,0.0004901883,0.00014636159,0.0003147613,0.00040169348,0.0020187015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018683537,0.00029304475,0.00013628589,0.000049384973,0.00063680817,0.000090836234,0.00017937661,0.0002847958,0.0006654405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020097576,0.000016082806,0.0008334153,0.000066103246,0.000074538046,0.000089067646,0.7215316,0.0000026799994,0.0000029559085,0.20440973,0.059055537,0.013898147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010004239,0.000042778116,0.00006790871,0.00016198818,0.000046069657,8.1707117e-7,0.00082436344,0.000001910318,0.000004361729,0.021516636,0.9768988,0.00033431328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014137717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000100498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9178433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007677901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015163454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236308964","doi":"10.7765/msi/9781526119704.13","title":"Chapter 12: ‘Because it does not make sense’: sovereignty’s power in the case of Delgamuukw v. The Queen 1997","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Manchester University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Supreme court; Law; Indigenous; Political science; Injustice; Power (physics); Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04708668175415881,"score_gpt":0.2654197548989816,"score_spread":0.2183330731448228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236308964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008853737,0.000054108663,0.000009627088,0.0009817265,0.00037554777,0.0009100403,0.00036039518,0.000051628493,0.99637157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44573793,0.000036895464,0.000031705556,0.0003497252,0.00016130868,0.0000018508492,0.0000037864097,0.000030413625,0.5536464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975938,0.00031065117,0.00034200208,0.00058990356,0.000654244,0.00050937163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99699426,0.00045245432,0.00060447614,0.001666512,0.00015482523,0.00012746008],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008568024,0.0004481236,0.0005179337,0.0001374611,0.0009143525,0.00022701835,0.001826402,0.00057362,0.00021233622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005662525,0.00029942452,0.00032292696,0.000009888237,0.0019613565,0.00020495734,0.0007815073,0.0008645929,0.000026963082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011538777,0.000017904515,0.000021398895,0.00004295248,0.00012485575,0.0051365867,0.17376336,0.0000011685531,0.0000013659886,0.81874216,0.0010058753,0.0010269689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042051004,0.00003614388,0.000023797096,0.00015736798,0.00020438661,0.000030504034,0.0072100908,0.0000026654873,0.000030254312,0.0033811582,0.9880843,0.00041880296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008660716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01285753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9870784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018355748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012544247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236421334","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v13i3.63674","title":"Rethinking Volks V Robinson: The Implications of Applying a \"Contextaulised Choice Model\" to Prospective South African Domestic Partnerships Legislation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); General partnership; Sine qua non; Duty; Law; Legislation; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Limited partnership; Sociology; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.07185191166909422,"score_gpt":0.316219953803129,"score_spread":0.2443680421340348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236421334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38092923,0.017550752,0.13024482,0.028890794,0.0020749134,0.017079439,0.00018450475,0.0023696173,0.42067593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99171096,0.0001751063,0.004446177,0.00037669728,0.0010841335,0.000767792,0.000010236621,0.00017148745,0.0012574065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99075043,0.0012937817,0.0016992912,0.0011758402,0.0018508928,0.0032297652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935529,0.0008373845,0.0017203015,0.0016086642,0.0013195735,0.0009611617],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048917094,0.0008614262,0.0011107863,0.0004166659,0.0036971655,0.0004974802,0.0028536618,0.00050690473,0.00017622592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019542868,0.0007205897,0.00067964115,0.0023002948,0.0014981859,0.0013465728,0.00034742258,0.0031000695,0.000069349924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000571924,0.00036351883,0.0040117884,0.000035329125,0.0007168947,0.000014956558,0.40059415,0.002774977,0.0010234212,0.58563757,0.00038007702,0.0038753937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007304677,0.0030256037,0.0035242024,0.0007073255,0.002374907,0.00025696462,0.09223674,0.0037305446,0.0043712547,0.6410356,0.23696396,0.0044681733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027415017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014351712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6107817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031557928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023922373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238421790","doi":"10.4324/9780203126653","title":"Vindicating Socio-Economic Rights","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Enforcement; Context (archaeology); Fundamental rights; Argument (complex analysis); International human rights law; Linguistic rights; Reservation of rights; Covenant; Right to property; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.02112629957064237,"score_gpt":0.31242794763332327,"score_spread":0.2913016480626809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238421790","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000015425585,0.001146555,0.000018550027,0.0003153565,0.0014947286,0.00025907098,0.000018243316,0.00026615677,0.9964659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017875697,0.00002325947,0.0008269917,0.00012789,0.0054922467,0.000014122335,0.000022893277,0.00003538527,0.9755815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983435,0.000102780235,0.00029254213,0.00031935412,0.00036770946,0.0005740585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881285,0.00025328257,0.00028416302,0.00034637257,0.0000328766,0.00027046938],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006818762,0.00021832144,0.00031988148,0.00008091118,0.00076822477,0.00011450172,0.00072633364,0.0006632478,0.020079728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004295139,0.00020212331,0.00016843712,0.000029736191,0.0005912597,0.0002287454,0.00013048446,0.00041559193,0.02274963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.768846e-7,0.0000072640746,0.000075580465,0.000007937729,0.000035790497,0.0000018153601,0.05361953,1.475859e-7,1.3904156e-7,0.67458355,0.27076223,0.0009052421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004592926,0.0000047760773,0.0000038108892,0.000017706205,0.000035076355,1.5116443e-7,0.0003240509,6.8664093e-7,0.0000016261305,0.04184534,0.9574441,0.0002767584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023385482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010637782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68668187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014934368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096079166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98081607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238801568","doi":"10.14426/ahmr.v3i2.824","title":"Benign Neglect or Active Destruction? A Critical Analysis of Refugee and Informal Sector Policy and Practice in South Africa","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AFRICAN HUMAN MOBILITY REVIEW","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Balsillie School of International Affairs","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Bureaucracy; Political science; Livelihood; Neglect; Corporate governance; Economic growth; Confusion; Poverty; Development economics; Law; Economics; Geography; Management","score_opus":0.05957333138471543,"score_gpt":0.4227461964927873,"score_spread":0.36317286510807184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238801568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7892641,0.034914482,0.00003884315,0.004161815,0.00014388854,0.003009806,0.00023082735,0.00013216205,0.16810407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962924,0.0024908187,0.0007326085,0.00013523918,0.00009494759,0.000067389105,0.000002372494,0.000010454391,0.00017372906],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971009,0.00089589285,0.00061961525,0.0004728796,0.00046502022,0.00044570531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99650455,0.0016161441,0.0005009102,0.00081174134,0.00030020412,0.00026648393],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021760536,0.00019986369,0.00085764885,0.00026943194,0.0009471857,0.0001881328,0.00046974226,0.0001210686,0.00020954618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03734328,0.00016916147,0.00013919412,0.001175026,0.00221799,0.0010265814,0.00026598206,0.00028559155,0.0000035009812],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004981122,0.00059612654,0.021923928,0.002798357,0.0009899901,0.000047725203,0.83480716,0.0000030780734,0.000046890582,0.09320667,0.00008634957,0.044995617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020524694,0.0015019026,0.42581895,0.0027672325,0.009624491,0.000029571009,0.06051592,0.000090942915,0.000026869076,0.008964729,0.48647875,0.0021281838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003020578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028551335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7742912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017072786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035148027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9707656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238816770","doi":"10.1002/div.5388","title":"Great‐West Lifeco Inc.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mergent s Dividend Achievers","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reinsurance; Subsidiary; Life insurance; Business; Health insurance; Finance; Plan (archaeology); Actuarial science; Economics; Economic growth; Health care; Multinational corporation; Geography","score_opus":0.01673982754958098,"score_gpt":0.2839205626527571,"score_spread":0.26718073510317614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238816770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39394456,0.0021915238,0.00028058368,0.008716935,0.0048260284,0.00064658927,0.00007269623,0.0007439845,0.5885771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808213,0.00006475694,0.00038454655,0.00026018167,0.0011854218,0.000020459835,0.000024509689,0.000024618097,0.017214175],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775326,0.00022276911,0.00028973963,0.00035484473,0.0007564398,0.0006229247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919206,0.000107985565,0.00011008463,0.00030958682,0.00005510016,0.00022518392],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005860295,0.0001856545,0.0002010348,0.000100290345,0.00071972073,0.00013025467,0.00055565365,0.00013545304,0.0041693407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018937555,0.0001842097,0.00012534152,0.00044658437,0.00034951814,0.00038887848,0.00012943048,0.00019677487,0.0023266033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005258776,0.00041689374,0.46720323,0.00003635202,0.00013135713,0.0001222238,0.043322597,0.00031232013,0.00032912698,0.16625121,0.31653637,0.0052857245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002133592,0.00002206717,0.015461719,0.000010580503,0.000035176865,3.214425e-7,0.0006902929,0.000008084962,0.00009865218,0.0020629175,0.98113346,0.0002633923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01917244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005115311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66459703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018391936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000104097795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243984867","doi":"10.7202/1021680ar","title":"Damages awarded by Arbitration Board — Application for certiorari to quash award — Wether board has power to award and assess damages","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Law; Dispose pattern; Arbitration; Jurisdiction; Economic Justice; Business; Punitive damages; Liability; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.03737503824203407,"score_gpt":0.31851796057445725,"score_spread":0.28114292233242316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243984867","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3176211,0.00052449596,0.37893003,0.19504632,0.0012415923,0.0062234458,0.00029460812,0.00091309164,0.0992053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798228,0.000013847312,0.008970863,0.00077321916,0.0003604033,0.0004125945,0.000059377468,0.00004721352,0.009539651],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976856,0.00031079826,0.00043489135,0.0005857064,0.0005123392,0.0004706515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979712,0.0006770333,0.00017163572,0.00047616736,0.00031855746,0.00038541018],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010072364,0.0002471263,0.00029292522,0.00020486092,0.0012513411,0.00044594487,0.0003933259,0.00051282486,0.00009082346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001584785,0.00026145313,0.00007524535,0.0007722319,0.00027799432,0.00045004053,0.00009620055,0.00034600918,0.00018643873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015270097,0.00038461038,0.037163258,0.0000193857,0.00016934716,0.000001146298,0.13488135,0.0016646618,0.0057824254,0.116590016,0.6721808,0.03101034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034035894,0.00013023238,0.0018093099,0.00002759819,0.00005060721,1.587449e-7,0.004635825,0.00025246735,0.0010504362,0.0015231919,0.9898292,0.00035061582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013707572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064297963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6622017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019865537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024259689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245180425","doi":"10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-4208-0007","title":"notes-for-a-speech-by-edward-broadbent-president-international-centre-for-human-rights-and-democratic-development-to-canadian-bar-association-london-england-barbican-centre-sept-25-1990-8-pp","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Human Rights Documents online","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Human rights; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.01805327747516768,"score_gpt":0.3235390848281612,"score_spread":0.3054858073529935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245180425","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038458784,0.00045150134,0.000049411436,0.00689298,0.0042620935,0.004464638,0.9773807,0.00030041498,0.0023524084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0043284795,0.000111278445,0.0019378643,0.0009903606,0.0044437903,0.00035831315,0.8449109,0.00016571696,0.14275329],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899177,0.0005000792,0.0020010117,0.002123465,0.0028440258,0.0026137002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99298793,0.0011746623,0.0014231933,0.0012814794,0.0012798624,0.001852856],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001675667,0.0013617423,0.0014900139,0.00082880596,0.0051092366,0.0012915331,0.0033081206,0.001291197,0.006306694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009456545,0.001164093,0.0004829164,0.0003740737,0.00042583435,0.0008387858,0.0004625491,0.000832619,0.0013993225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060084833,0.0004361714,0.00040857494,0.00008973428,0.0008997408,0.00004175064,0.003686158,9.988909e-7,0.000014255621,0.003011203,0.99097,0.00038130517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043188785,0.000102947204,0.00006569231,0.000463582,0.00039211966,0.0000013424603,0.00007163745,0.0000036911715,0.00008978478,0.010683037,0.982189,0.0016182736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14201483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65393144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51191664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056532496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091968203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248643579","doi":"10.7202/1021684ar","title":"Right for employees working for an employer outside the limits of the City of Montreal, to absent themselves for two hours, without loss of pay, in order to vote as electors on the City of Montreal elections — Applications of article 328 of the Charter of the City of Montreal","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Salary; Obligation; Work (physics); Law; Order (exchange); Political science; Business; Engineering; Finance; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.04129080020596097,"score_gpt":0.3222224253999829,"score_spread":0.28093162519402193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248643579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98814017,0.000050559025,0.002450634,0.0031201413,0.00008526197,0.003846702,0.0003326638,0.000011700346,0.0019621914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987634,0.000006397815,0.00033959543,0.00003317716,0.00008280024,0.000343371,0.0000033258882,0.000022580152,0.00040535873],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974172,0.00042898295,0.0009844105,0.00027414173,0.0005745843,0.00032066912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99447185,0.0023790572,0.0011261945,0.000951483,0.0010058181,0.00006562017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012472061,0.00019759807,0.0005010256,0.00012167297,0.00045491746,0.000012928216,0.0009914857,0.00021222078,0.000008799305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002075851,0.00009796763,0.00029724193,0.0018495797,0.0009215252,0.000092116046,0.00011862337,0.00027623272,1.6716542e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004532311,0.0013816634,0.8749299,0.000033383767,0.00033427015,1.6631764e-8,0.0814041,0.00722174,0.003809431,0.025571058,0.0008314806,0.00402974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016278618,0.00080167776,0.7662504,0.00045501356,0.00054364454,3.6035007e-7,0.009086277,0.0010158159,0.19896705,0.018383697,0.0025623613,0.0003058451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025366927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06852691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19515762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006978535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003868019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98112327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250119383","doi":"10.1017/s0021853701457938","title":"TWENTIETH-CENTURY SWAZILAND <i>When the Sleeping Grass Awakens: Land and Power in Swaziland</i>. By R<scp>ICHARD </scp>L<scp>EVIN</scp>. Johannesburg: University of Witwatersrand Press, 1997. Pp. 290. SA Rand 98.94 (<scp>ISBN</scp> 1-86814-301-5).","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of African History","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); History; Archaeology; Economic history","score_opus":0.012124313984791675,"score_gpt":0.21353790170005468,"score_spread":0.20141358771526302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250119383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77576846,0.17388518,0.00017803657,0.0007844711,0.0019987798,0.0008605385,0.000100217025,0.00008487742,0.04633944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95768076,0.030052198,0.00010771706,0.00025247358,0.00048737254,0.0000037928469,0.000008445132,0.000071973845,0.01133526],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99410695,0.0017746915,0.0009780265,0.0004980654,0.0015263681,0.001115895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937441,0.0031008695,0.0015469658,0.00064621767,0.00042661338,0.00053522957],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004636633,0.0005328854,0.0010937129,0.0002679542,0.0009121865,0.00011746965,0.0017609216,0.00035952218,0.000048485632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013904411,0.00039253008,0.00034766342,0.0005764613,0.0021407416,0.000814562,0.0003177763,0.0012491596,0.000017594895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019094339,0.0002920673,0.04399663,0.00007196602,0.00036849736,0.00017510324,0.3984975,0.00009447783,0.0006648085,0.00008558356,0.5553229,0.0002395769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002765515,0.00022561433,0.004281345,0.00017718665,0.00037891447,0.000042423984,0.034664497,0.000019306342,0.0000876126,0.00030278144,0.9569394,0.00011542122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035425287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010011866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4016165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008617792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004137711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250952640","doi":"10.14426/ahmr.v3i2.830","title":"Security Risk and Xenophobia in the Urban Informal Sector","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AFRICAN HUMAN MOBILITY REVIEW","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Balsillie School of International Affairs","funders":"","keywords":"Xenophobia; Informal sector; Victimisation; Survey data collection; Political science; Refugee; Migrant workers; Security forces; Criminology; Development economics; Sociology; Economic growth; Racism; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.034183864420811,"score_gpt":0.3478570658549397,"score_spread":0.3136732014341287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250952640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7145566,0.048918594,0.0000010657293,0.0014217683,0.00016378565,0.0020510447,0.0000412997,0.000072494666,0.2327734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905821,0.008425967,0.000018464725,0.0004352766,0.00018526359,0.000096985765,0.0000021230303,0.000007915509,0.00024591284],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753845,0.0008644599,0.00041040464,0.00032656937,0.00044542848,0.0004146773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979501,0.00023022716,0.00035275132,0.0012629268,0.0000669628,0.00013704963],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052052485,0.00016486525,0.00039862498,0.000027911316,0.0019445062,0.0002960356,0.0013344091,0.00008210413,0.00033933565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020714523,0.00011852007,0.00010837567,0.00019208621,0.0014172728,0.00047100792,0.00023571478,0.00044997412,0.000056450892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014513956,0.00032050526,0.4436974,0.0016256827,0.00003008986,0.000021653823,0.4924464,1.7625631e-7,0.000004146087,0.039371844,0.0075968234,0.014870765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017682451,0.00005765697,0.10843787,0.00032075698,0.000054577526,7.37866e-7,0.0022492833,0.0000016055876,0.0000014365305,0.0037138718,0.8847698,0.00021559859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008685868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008431794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87717295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008194774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008883453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252183880","doi":"10.1002/div.2104","title":"Jean Coutu Group (PJC) Inc. (The)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mergent s Dividend Achievers","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Estate; Real estate; Distribution (mathematics); Citation; Market share; Marketing; Computer science; World Wide Web; Finance; Mathematics","score_opus":0.020925439515239334,"score_gpt":0.3003029225300649,"score_spread":0.27937748301482557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252183880","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36258733,0.007166838,0.0010324745,0.108198784,0.009154004,0.0019589611,0.00008259944,0.0012849792,0.508534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766996,0.00019837958,0.0005080861,0.0011890294,0.0014314149,0.000026579235,0.000010097567,0.000024102112,0.01991274],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975323,0.00032420264,0.00029331533,0.00033400237,0.00088374026,0.0006324385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989025,0.00024037952,0.00011937689,0.00041390044,0.000056847362,0.0002669935],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011300641,0.00018580645,0.0001819341,0.00006451685,0.0010953587,0.00013834458,0.0009394727,0.00011139398,0.0034454763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039121145,0.0001473824,0.00013941126,0.0004200059,0.0005014528,0.00046447362,0.00018437182,0.00029125824,0.0026074827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008465754,0.00055296766,0.041670024,0.000025388044,0.00029927737,0.000032523312,0.3452892,0.0005491843,0.00045048335,0.128918,0.40748328,0.07464499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018731461,0.000020958747,0.0009280241,0.0000069382872,0.000038049668,1.9548673e-7,0.0036456995,0.000053823256,0.00004350725,0.00032397566,0.9945419,0.00020962446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035408821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004117909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6141122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024281895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000088047585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253030667","doi":"10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-3065-0104","title":"briefing-papers-canadian-policy-in-namibia-a-lack-of-clout-or-a-lack-of-commitmant-sept-1985-6-pp","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Human Rights Documents online","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Operations research; Geography; Engineering","score_opus":0.07046414943660437,"score_gpt":0.41109356950784176,"score_spread":0.3406294200712374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253030667","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011007417,0.0007994595,0.0000026447767,0.0016345548,0.0014029525,0.0013745626,0.9607819,0.000119106546,0.032784108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036446963,0.0016960542,0.0008959828,0.0017528507,0.0049070553,0.00012586902,0.88833505,0.00023844888,0.0656017],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918619,0.00074261037,0.0021227724,0.0013565543,0.0019799448,0.0019362618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943176,0.00047550868,0.0014472565,0.0024332397,0.00036156317,0.0009648595],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011327787,0.0010248278,0.0019406878,0.0015190763,0.0010239593,0.00024827398,0.0043053124,0.0013112163,0.008096318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057350536,0.0007902158,0.0004903202,0.0012704085,0.0017902373,0.000717745,0.000580014,0.0010906985,0.0005823692],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006323337,0.00066496915,0.00012408198,0.00025719713,0.00027162847,0.00030351442,0.0046942816,0.000001422661,0.000010563627,0.022054354,0.9711037,0.00045104598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014859656,0.00019967351,0.00009819455,0.0009048011,0.00014684498,0.0000026711784,0.00012941058,0.000001165681,0.000026241221,0.009135272,0.9868853,0.0009844225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55168366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8357649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28408122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014442749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002181728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253361622","doi":"10.4324/9781843145790-55","title":"Community Savings Credit Union v United Assn Of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada 2001 B.C.S.C. 413","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Apprenticeship; Political science; Economic history; Economics; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.034179753395241076,"score_gpt":0.2619687173672524,"score_spread":0.22778896397201134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253361622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8792368,0.00090943824,0.000001802236,0.0008084981,0.00022625216,0.00035642742,0.00015209467,0.000014403772,0.11829429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689268,0.00042576613,0.000058546375,0.00011352005,0.00007021295,0.0000012757764,0.000016072436,0.000022544471,0.030365264],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977733,0.0006463032,0.00049925357,0.0001455493,0.00064605306,0.0002895775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971406,0.0009507612,0.0010233155,0.0003985524,0.00033858593,0.00014821647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018296349,0.00022060145,0.00041517944,0.0001338041,0.00067556085,0.00005284202,0.00060255686,0.0004514291,0.00011150294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005150631,0.00014917355,0.00004228917,0.00025014274,0.0018728112,0.0001593361,0.000752277,0.0013099421,4.731969e-8],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060287704,0.00015539888,0.4759825,0.0016587286,0.00089449954,0.0000025345114,0.437368,0.00006287112,0.0003560906,0.06569334,0.013771887,0.0039938632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015440945,0.00016420618,0.045331683,0.00451159,0.0012886618,0.000008238599,0.19365834,0.000330593,0.0009733434,0.0084839035,0.74243027,0.0012750773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92415935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6468284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7286584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096045624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034915988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6900451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255546245","doi":"10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-9986-0007","title":"guatemalan-community-leaders-ask-canadian-government-to-investigate-human-rights-violations-committed-by-goldcorp-inc-at-marlin-mine-dec-9-2009-1pp","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Human Rights Documents online","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Ask price; Political science; Fishery; Human rights; Public administration; Geography; Business; Law; Biology; Finance","score_opus":0.03675572701866012,"score_gpt":0.34732086100792814,"score_spread":0.310565133989268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255546245","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03284508,0.00035131452,0.0000038476237,0.001924839,0.0018335133,0.0023862286,0.94296825,0.00040889363,0.017278057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04720918,0.000050541155,0.00031898895,0.0017548397,0.002825636,0.00023722059,0.8437538,0.00020826753,0.103641525],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868616,0.0025198068,0.0021541084,0.0017417991,0.0038690723,0.0028536392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99061793,0.0007252245,0.0012943826,0.003914809,0.00050543126,0.0029422257],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019878861,0.0017579447,0.0017772167,0.00094309455,0.012393212,0.0009785971,0.0058496767,0.0017418809,0.0158661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032478984,0.0014607803,0.0004741415,0.0009594287,0.002371951,0.0012249459,0.0011651095,0.0025858828,0.00695645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003145297,0.0006884192,0.0003652524,0.00009316713,0.00034280116,0.00014060538,0.004386623,0.0000014287718,0.000065085536,0.0019456833,0.9919072,0.000032280368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00147817,0.00027028113,0.00015169289,0.0006412704,0.00039247915,0.0000034336372,0.00039459436,0.0000013159315,0.00008055892,0.0072923475,0.98731613,0.0019777333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49119833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8711142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3799159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054932213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005698304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281679871","doi":"10.21991/cf29444","title":"Doctrine Calling: Inherent Indigenous Jurisdiction in Vuntut Gwitchin","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Indigenous; Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Chemistry; Philosophy; Sociology; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.02070468328231063,"score_gpt":0.2974262186870117,"score_spread":0.27672153540470107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281679871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22508173,0.009617133,0.052200932,0.021878432,0.018794192,0.0059199473,0.0014474262,0.001654916,0.6634053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960883,0.000088392604,0.0005693924,0.0009241292,0.00031949166,0.00049851486,0.00017602605,0.000016158858,0.0013195513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995314,0.0004050272,0.0008448234,0.0007203512,0.0014276573,0.0012881474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985281,0.00022030015,0.00027783038,0.00040764952,0.00021529601,0.00035077965],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012868791,0.0003556603,0.00042132437,0.00062513776,0.0053257197,0.00015518357,0.0007984885,0.00020873343,0.0016967551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047698675,0.00040953205,0.00022458345,0.0014626817,0.0044226856,0.0007414319,0.00047353376,0.0009811687,0.00027895352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009596623,0.00033977474,0.048506927,0.000008824225,0.000038494876,0.00011847798,0.008206637,0.0065000495,0.00005121457,0.9333678,0.0017357025,0.0010301495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016050142,0.00010301019,0.0005850729,0.00004468568,0.00003400892,0.00007622034,0.011305125,0.00031007535,0.00005483902,0.021807741,0.9634731,0.00060112117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003865797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031248087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9617374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023700953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043302216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281715103","doi":"10.21991/cf29443","title":"Dickson v Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation, Section 25 and a Plurinational Charter","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Charter; Political science; History; Law; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.022677648802949302,"score_gpt":0.2633903208127694,"score_spread":0.2407126720098201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281715103","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04489537,0.005147997,0.09171714,0.11834946,0.022343272,0.0038968609,0.0023577812,0.0016254653,0.70966667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942484,0.000055632998,0.0005833598,0.0013264677,0.00066484016,0.00040205638,0.00021006214,0.00001396008,0.0024952379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996491,0.00022464205,0.00053130236,0.0006554396,0.0013429709,0.00075464544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985296,0.00028621856,0.00023756221,0.0002630203,0.0003818179,0.00030177727],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009181598,0.00029714778,0.0002771587,0.0004095135,0.009692177,0.0002271933,0.00043447493,0.00017309493,0.0021084258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006925685,0.0003404145,0.00015329561,0.0007592692,0.005334734,0.0011037341,0.0003881495,0.0005470895,0.00012631429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045290253,0.0001422988,0.015609156,0.000012238368,0.000049849983,0.000024172952,0.0039876243,0.0007132722,0.000025860965,0.969615,0.009413631,0.00036162898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011086925,0.00006741936,0.00088303786,0.000035186073,0.000035362085,0.00011165555,0.0059384597,0.0006451092,0.0000137102215,0.022741338,0.9679786,0.00044145164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009775613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012777585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95856494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010051281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017253014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285406453","doi":"10.56516/revdirfem.v1i1.7","title":"A perspectiva de gênero no Direito brasileiro","year":2022,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Direito e Feminismos","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"WSP (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.031041783299199863,"score_gpt":0.3281479352883388,"score_spread":0.2971061519891389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285406453","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045568887,0.023304248,0.000106111045,0.0062160473,0.006412462,0.0026206481,0.0010611941,0.0009742411,0.91373616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83171564,0.0003467376,0.00022109067,0.0011060799,0.0029811494,0.00037382497,0.000039075418,0.00017100458,0.16304538],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99019057,0.0023654804,0.0010892753,0.001669557,0.0025472804,0.0021378133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99545825,0.0009090412,0.0007090792,0.0016161575,0.0003040968,0.0010033571],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027611903,0.0008328101,0.0011752679,0.00024565068,0.00364644,0.0008996302,0.002744502,0.00037710555,0.017621778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019059181,0.0009578053,0.00078583625,0.0021377993,0.0009073161,0.0004055227,0.001644216,0.0017735157,0.0022874752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036964277,0.0014987629,0.027027791,0.00049999607,0.00044890644,0.001051832,0.4162481,0.00006474154,0.00072489167,0.11627834,0.43168435,0.004102663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006092838,0.0003633185,0.0010877096,0.00014011418,0.00022914444,0.000020140847,0.028464647,0.00020258571,0.00005216905,0.00023952924,0.96747273,0.001118632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022896656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001805476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78614676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002808572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014098523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99928725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285718216","doi":"10.7202/1088752ar","title":"Un verrou sur la justiciabilité des droits sociaux","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Sociologie et sociétés","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3973988204679872,"score_gpt":0.5120563651370097,"score_spread":0.1146575446690225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285718216","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15677434,0.06401108,0.000662635,0.31799144,0.009763504,0.0010345221,0.0003000167,0.0012970215,0.44816545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756483,0.004044755,0.002626002,0.005902789,0.0021106717,0.000044753273,0.000023058303,0.00009625873,0.009503415],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920528,0.0038368255,0.0007106454,0.00100493,0.0008118807,0.0015829415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99289864,0.00532275,0.00035883026,0.00040678587,0.00036015676,0.00065282185],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026336343,0.0005870185,0.00090174226,0.00003192906,0.0011369966,0.00019915975,0.0013231805,0.0016037332,0.005992171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011186816,0.00063153054,0.0006914096,0.00086826104,0.0078117964,0.00078733277,0.0006171035,0.0017992203,0.002421853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004871513,0.00037122492,0.0076623904,0.00025369247,0.00041220445,0.00012970062,0.48757863,0.000121814875,0.00011032045,0.41624522,0.054834586,0.032231495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011820988,0.00037472846,0.0028997376,0.00007996225,0.00043348575,0.0000018293109,0.06746433,0.000208801,0.000104264305,0.37988698,0.54619247,0.0011713157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006675077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002889603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81887394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085400284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011372878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294982954","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197550021.013.9","title":"Remedies and Accountability for Economic and Social Rights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interim; Remedial education; Accountability; Political science; Dialogic; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.03435361386078709,"score_gpt":0.2605806518804142,"score_spread":0.2262270380196271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294982954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00071185606,0.00014177235,0.0000060327416,0.00010604489,0.00028823092,0.00057790364,0.00046248984,0.00007626334,0.9976294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017750017,0.00017090625,0.00018280827,0.000030992473,0.00036277671,0.000003529101,0.000021372467,0.000021856642,0.98145574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989656,0.000053395917,0.00012316651,0.00042614032,0.00018657031,0.00024511619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993522,0.00019534738,0.00015717515,0.0001587502,0.00004430798,0.00009222533],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027913565,0.00019291471,0.00030918283,0.00006951173,0.00176819,0.000076140626,0.00031554943,0.00028079032,0.0001743572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000074643276,0.00023329182,0.00009912399,0.0000025357433,0.001092872,0.00016678273,0.00044152516,0.0002535958,3.6711413e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008415791,0.0000026649122,0.0000121791745,0.0000379293,0.000057428595,0.000004709596,0.029367723,1.1702476e-7,2.6617022e-7,0.96795225,0.0012666227,0.0012139692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031365402,0.000031485626,0.0000057667844,0.0000068995155,0.000119754324,3.1006735e-7,0.001022487,0.0000030827832,0.0000015774456,0.012841067,0.98540354,0.00025038022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017004985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021887368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98413694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042646416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012755251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297235682","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v25i2.14860","title":"DNA EVIDENCE IN SOUTH AFRICA: FALLACIES AND THE FUTURE","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Profiling (computer programming); Legislature; Political science; Law; DNA profiling; Common law; Biology; DNA; Genetics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03152925795317972,"score_gpt":0.2845128952228036,"score_spread":0.25298363726962386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297235682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72177666,0.036618963,0.000012711644,0.036433294,0.0016982427,0.0008647782,0.00002265316,0.00013622834,0.20243648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908652,0.000037732727,0.00006719621,0.0004904417,0.00028411738,0.000060712133,2.873791e-7,0.0000053050885,0.00818902],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987316,0.00043572907,0.000099380326,0.00015835158,0.0003565617,0.00021835178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950284,0.00024702784,0.000038377857,0.00015607862,0.000017384098,0.000038280163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010482816,0.000060363647,0.00009770062,0.000036842153,0.00053565553,0.000096195035,0.0003227649,0.000029731158,0.00050445885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017363245,0.000041511048,0.000031832682,0.00036098048,0.0004041302,0.00014522101,0.00024174286,0.00021431054,0.000029781788],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000355103,0.000007209705,0.007335918,0.0000029031964,0.0000031699892,0.000007890284,0.971107,0.0000036208048,0.000008813506,0.019408807,0.0016456277,0.00043351884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026596643,0.000012688625,0.0011000329,0.0000069153043,0.0000059362587,4.180646e-7,0.08443748,0.000011187194,0.000002735736,0.002074269,0.9120002,0.00008217563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001505295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023089226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91035455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006945017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044676526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.552347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297805254","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-10695-8","title":"Informal Livelihoods and Governance in South Africa","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg; National Research Foundation; Economic and Social Research Council; University of Edinburgh; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Livelihood; Corporate governance; Everyday life; Economic growth; Political science; Development economics; Geography; Business; Economics; Law; Archaeology; Finance","score_opus":0.018093480536637573,"score_gpt":0.26457227557492874,"score_spread":0.24647879503829118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297805254","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000031928124,0.0035289435,0.0000029085327,0.00015371849,0.00036594312,0.00029794802,0.00007094176,0.000091871836,0.9954558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043401167,0.00023530477,0.00031507644,0.00016523953,0.00030991214,0.000032296117,0.000009418308,0.000024026964,0.9555076],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804294,0.000085666106,0.00029313812,0.0003198444,0.00080078555,0.0004576388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992573,0.0001519651,0.00019031035,0.00022464237,0.000034788503,0.00014098253],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005743242,0.00020399885,0.00030896158,0.0000843515,0.0003009401,0.00010612749,0.0005309832,0.00028481887,0.007828415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024623127,0.0002091018,0.00006565583,0.00021486712,0.00036612485,0.00024410222,0.0004703255,0.00069048523,0.00017719014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012203193,0.000013407981,0.00042668846,0.00002527232,0.000013088439,0.000032459706,0.6517301,0.0000022354923,3.4494416e-8,0.3106958,0.03477369,0.002275008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015097992,0.000032316686,0.00016956944,0.000024461378,0.000009996736,2.149687e-7,0.005017384,0.0000044938006,8.5954895e-8,0.0026345034,0.99168295,0.00027307577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005171103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010415383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95690924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044446925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009781596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9930786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297990014","doi":"10.18357/ijcyfs132-3202221032","title":"THE ROLE OF CITIES IN ENDING VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN IN SOUTH AFRICA","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Child Youth and Family Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Foundation","keywords":"Urbanization; Sustainable development; Normative; Political science; Economic growth; Government (linguistics); Population; Human rights; Sexual abuse; Development economics; Poison control; Law; Suicide prevention; Environmental health; Medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.020175827029282827,"score_gpt":0.2857010932271,"score_spread":0.2655252661978172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297990014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9316072,0.05483654,0.0000020039045,0.0009855875,0.0006203513,0.000088553505,0.000048624825,0.0000046823707,0.011806471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99578774,0.0037453452,0.000026167983,0.00020433273,0.00020398092,0.000004414135,8.029937e-7,0.000004746159,0.000022496479],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834996,0.0001826816,0.00044393528,0.0000985939,0.00073881686,0.00018601074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916595,0.00023872376,0.00033472636,0.000054730655,0.00016922723,0.00003661651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001089429,0.00008201417,0.0002009706,0.00023146757,0.0003472346,0.00004239939,0.00054608355,0.000020534866,0.0000024269668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045493265,0.0000623457,0.000065226384,0.00021024469,0.00035829368,0.00013456287,0.0002568335,0.00031243864,2.5528217e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104044164,0.000043158267,0.27488065,0.0000012808415,0.00013486338,0.000012944432,0.7152136,0.00021699864,0.000008226567,0.0035942907,0.00003087,0.0057590893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008046393,0.000090222675,0.10430151,0.00023908039,0.000018621211,0.000003587514,0.8744928,0.000014616094,0.0000215685,0.006719883,0.013155802,0.00013767183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014565705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000060560033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17057914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014065762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058484908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2670683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298019662","doi":"","title":"Putting third first: critical legal issues and HIV/AIDS.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"湖北中医学院学报","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Poverty; Human rights; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Political science; Economic growth; Law; Medicine; Virology; Economics","score_opus":0.015255948894048289,"score_gpt":0.3271282439929399,"score_spread":0.3118722950988916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298019662","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14544633,0.003939505,0.000080490834,0.023826554,0.0005398023,0.00026228925,0.000021826196,0.0004940193,0.8253892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9400792,0.00012114135,0.009709477,0.00042454564,0.0010204741,0.000010684635,0.0000014342796,0.000017927276,0.048615076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831635,0.0001474683,0.00020904803,0.00033526134,0.00045584003,0.0005360332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991464,0.000362483,0.000024930207,0.00021097682,0.000060025108,0.00019516499],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056327885,0.00013709425,0.00019618587,0.000042082418,0.00082367955,0.0003377405,0.00029563942,0.00014550149,0.0033376182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009240194,0.00013411744,0.00005612145,0.00023641993,0.00071261026,0.00049742725,0.00006456321,0.00021977205,0.0010995783],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038296712,0.00014472385,0.011341961,0.00006263461,0.00003432002,0.00016603462,0.2565145,0.000011846788,0.00004307141,0.6302065,0.05430865,0.047127463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013203039,0.000036633104,0.00029375163,0.000030102905,0.00001656502,0.0000028990582,0.0019488402,0.00006530402,0.000054366006,0.008566363,0.98868126,0.00017187232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015218247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021073665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9343726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005012219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005333738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306318151","doi":"10.1163/17087384-bja10073","title":"Casting a Constitutional Light on the Cultural Defence in South African Criminal Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Political science; Criminal law; Indigenous; Public law; Civil law (Civil law)","score_opus":0.07884638516160358,"score_gpt":0.34129568917961983,"score_spread":0.26244930401801625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306318151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5468397,0.008124368,0.00002963831,0.03295087,0.0021421402,0.0004332382,0.00004615073,0.00005051432,0.4093834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982436,0.000023253158,0.00020611551,0.00057678105,0.00050444686,0.000025119674,2.2672423e-7,0.000007613618,0.0004128499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966356,0.0007797252,0.0005516958,0.00020630767,0.0013352489,0.00049140916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980216,0.00083877105,0.00051294256,0.0001336489,0.00036590197,0.00012711088],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021601345,0.00017848614,0.00037690645,0.00013057228,0.0024444622,0.0001262362,0.0007503783,0.0000276737,0.00013156101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018165143,0.00011831915,0.00017097646,0.00080804963,0.0025276195,0.00032018157,0.00027115902,0.0008693168,0.000011602831],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010829251,0.0000726036,0.0011865738,0.0000044150243,0.000085728505,0.00031808412,0.4689889,0.0003503555,0.000027672939,0.527525,0.0012271978,0.00010520809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029545336,0.00031269324,0.0001605279,0.00005196803,0.000056167897,0.000053193053,0.62462485,0.000004393157,0.000033059277,0.0014034734,0.37282825,0.00017595821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053218636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004287298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5261215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072646106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039908127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312224242","doi":"","title":"Laverne A. Jacobs &amp; Justice Anne L. Mactavish, eds., Dialogue Between Court And Tribunals – Essays In Administrative Law And Justice (2001- 2007)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Political science","score_opus":0.27898383656870224,"score_gpt":0.5710314281679922,"score_spread":0.29204759159929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312224242","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63144696,0.08124442,0.00038025217,0.003756869,0.0018356494,0.002203748,0.00084374857,0.00015370332,0.27813464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980994,0.014962423,0.00067146413,0.0010266901,0.0009991417,0.000020037765,0.00002757611,0.000037341124,0.001261316],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951581,0.00088113215,0.0010959299,0.000728686,0.0011749269,0.0009612486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954448,0.0018950232,0.0008895366,0.00041907222,0.0004937713,0.0008578337],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043882504,0.00045617548,0.0011832393,0.0004592765,0.00090703176,0.0019211519,0.0020475371,0.00034000727,0.002872374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026070501,0.0004520463,0.00010435481,0.0013383719,0.0009847163,0.0032200296,0.00050478074,0.00082648406,0.000027661139],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017564746,0.0020665207,0.55383384,0.0008110049,0.0007143272,0.0008249267,0.07737028,0.0001313457,0.0061892457,0.03298046,0.29324988,0.030071743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002557582,0.000122304,0.39381927,0.00088305544,0.0012979495,0.00001769547,0.0041243737,0.00002873614,0.0011756928,0.052775826,0.5415045,0.0016930032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006434373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024001151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34954703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019950303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037041647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312845928","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4297377","title":"Reconsidering the Test for Interlocutory Injunctions Affecting Homeless Encampments: A Critical Assessment of BC Case Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Interlocutory; Law; Test (biology); Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Geology","score_opus":0.048467092402171,"score_gpt":0.35817870566669086,"score_spread":0.30971161326451985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312845928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8575327,0.0069541167,0.04314548,0.017958317,0.007838339,0.002741619,0.00012072915,0.0002891785,0.06341955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982219,0.000054765147,0.0006471942,0.00011018058,0.0003727877,0.000091518516,6.38365e-7,0.00001892207,0.00048211063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971063,0.0005281532,0.0003426637,0.00017956442,0.00043516,0.0014081614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970929,0.0023196721,0.00018977848,0.0001589901,0.00015408534,0.00008459912],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005895959,0.00010755674,0.00019388205,0.00008067613,0.003369954,0.00011112307,0.0003683328,0.00004085535,0.00013757724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014315979,0.00009247161,0.00015276951,0.00027971657,0.00034562766,0.0002295548,0.00013560778,0.0018382614,0.000001458417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000258898,0.00028173072,0.0021168538,0.00001974484,0.00017264594,0.000058602374,0.06268564,0.00015612427,0.00013596,0.92767805,0.00015651358,0.0065122484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008601747,0.001388928,0.000035155008,0.0000420581,0.0001820925,0.0019867516,0.6923163,0.00041879018,0.00005674452,0.23922619,0.06313961,0.000347198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010258146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0084893005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6884519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002254261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022899953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99792755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313680416","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4318312","title":"Litigation Under Section 7 of the Charter After R v Brown","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Charter; Political science; Law; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.010948033319190701,"score_gpt":0.27623483037014424,"score_spread":0.26528679705095354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313680416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9773704,0.0006721827,0.0005758492,0.0070116306,0.0015126969,0.00016225537,0.0000021007438,0.00007088911,0.012622032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870007,0.0003111689,0.0000059746503,0.00008383991,0.00088136824,0.0000058815976,5.2790637e-7,0.000009364923,0.011701145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810344,0.00021099494,0.00015995513,0.00009157362,0.00042579044,0.001008249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996057,0.00004115568,0.00010854433,0.00011327187,0.000089643996,0.0000416789],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016433548,0.000058882644,0.000072412535,0.000063687614,0.0003627707,0.00004580679,0.0002289021,0.00007617597,0.00010966708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000095692056,0.0000425397,0.00009674332,0.00057459966,0.00014868581,0.00020319062,0.000029495412,0.00075612194,0.000078851386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096988006,0.0000824362,0.03065937,0.000015853358,0.00023113172,0.0000032120877,0.17511168,0.00018637405,0.001806217,0.77532566,0.0020794047,0.014401656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046991665,0.00013302374,0.025808265,0.000047949678,0.00005396101,0.000018230869,0.03955991,0.00005047271,0.00042262787,0.8260109,0.10720311,0.00022166267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002687871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027271537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13555178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005797178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010370106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32850158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313728292","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4317458","title":"Implicitly Feminist?: The SCC’s decision in R v Jarvis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.007567481177700835,"score_gpt":0.299370103768089,"score_spread":0.29180262259038814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313728292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83335924,0.0048003863,0.0003826024,0.0033801105,0.0009562635,0.0003586411,0.0000014242855,0.000041313837,0.15672003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99280906,0.000984648,0.00006637676,0.000281986,0.00043555596,0.000004201605,2.8554916e-7,0.00001604464,0.0054018623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963778,0.00024927917,0.0002862986,0.00019280375,0.0006208301,0.002272967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914736,0.0003161845,0.00013048097,0.00025101358,0.0000638921,0.000091059126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004910826,0.0001145842,0.00016325946,0.00009662919,0.0004615995,0.00016895121,0.00089666416,0.00011194883,0.0002725923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003284859,0.00007899087,0.00010428809,0.0005198696,0.00013221065,0.00021064171,0.00007381534,0.0019080003,0.00069868844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008330852,0.000060072136,0.061173428,0.0000018599727,0.000038775837,0.0000071059044,0.048337266,0.000037330567,0.00008403745,0.8327174,0.00046634622,0.056993023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072120375,0.00019073272,0.00277277,0.000036150705,0.000014087629,0.00003707778,0.041479938,0.000029673281,0.00001644229,0.47284624,0.48161986,0.00023582061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013003739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010763888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48115352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014380665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024131048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8980459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317934103","doi":"10.1017/s0008423922000865","title":"In Your Face: Law, Justice, and Niqab-Wearing Women in Canada Natasha Bakht, Toronto: Irwin Law, 2020, pp. 266","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.01485837862073951,"score_gpt":0.2931429287647197,"score_spread":0.2782845501439802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317934103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8941966,0.0013861635,0.000002610658,0.00606662,0.0017211661,0.00017867183,0.00013643807,0.000005073917,0.09630665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969539,0.0000095393625,0.00008128716,0.0024068905,0.00021389862,0.0000061919122,3.540493e-7,0.000008039015,0.00031991958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957986,0.00024781795,0.00043231697,0.00027255167,0.0010503873,0.0021983548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960081,0.00020024773,0.00009787837,0.00015311927,0.000109233275,0.0034314196],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032708426,0.0001222267,0.0002702004,0.00011857368,0.001017487,0.0002116064,0.0010888771,0.000043670974,0.0015022961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012922594,0.00012991317,0.000027101994,0.00091810565,0.001397941,0.0009258187,0.00014594034,0.0005670576,0.0000030263363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007619871,0.000014582924,0.010211509,0.000011739296,0.0000036262345,0.0011446198,0.046528824,0.00013203232,0.000024154118,0.9404831,0.0012634951,0.00017470973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011805223,0.00025932022,0.0677421,0.00009758404,0.000034976736,0.00016269206,0.47627404,0.0004143322,0.00006464499,0.02231354,0.4305783,0.00087796914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9989736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91816956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02083745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021609489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99941045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319782459","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4349241","title":"Section 3 of the Charter at 40","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Charter; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutionalism; Law; Political science; Constitution; Original meaning; Section (typography); Constitutional law; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Politics; Epistemology; History; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.01244093780514937,"score_gpt":0.28415187599366143,"score_spread":0.27171093818851205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319782459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93650997,0.0010163655,0.0000898623,0.00596015,0.0030773054,0.00016970426,0.0000024378294,0.00009159831,0.053082623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9556788,0.00062220317,0.0000035456105,0.00004486994,0.0012998887,0.000002323817,3.5157493e-7,0.00000905122,0.042338964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786496,0.00019446824,0.0001517925,0.00009162781,0.000446077,0.0012510525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958634,0.00004812746,0.00012425167,0.00012704254,0.00006740314,0.000046831465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019974664,0.000058666963,0.000084304214,0.00005478973,0.0006887352,0.000027763594,0.00035538053,0.00007306883,0.0001351419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015683453,0.000041063246,0.00010969214,0.00057372206,0.00015125157,0.00011964708,0.00006210184,0.0008290328,0.00013210175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018464393,0.00012252359,0.05491564,0.000019745105,0.00040739754,0.000008630249,0.29868734,0.00013512923,0.00734597,0.5916853,0.025229827,0.021257851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042916872,0.00013118632,0.005609268,0.000022418415,0.00003957532,0.00003053684,0.01908008,0.000030338524,0.00046047175,0.1463247,0.82766366,0.00017861607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030035054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046331417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80243385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009791179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095952844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52972645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321238841","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/ndu6m","title":"Regulations relevant to (long-form) audio recordings in South Africa","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Nautical Research Society","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Business; Speech recognition","score_opus":0.07216214127457114,"score_gpt":0.34130801558076973,"score_spread":0.2691458743061986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321238841","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07394345,0.00033958367,0.0046517067,0.029521717,0.0063387053,0.003683794,0.00013066662,0.0026669006,0.8787235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8333957,0.000029509529,0.0071503995,0.00015823382,0.0006263433,0.00023749284,0.000019065135,0.000061256265,0.15832198],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963416,0.00024694455,0.00067071617,0.0009246701,0.00092240196,0.000893696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980079,0.00032957926,0.00022101289,0.00084796094,0.00021094055,0.0003826297],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018318678,0.00031720244,0.00051100046,0.00058202766,0.0004474909,0.0003339546,0.0011783097,0.0006071301,0.00066659885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023899232,0.00032061027,0.00020776338,0.0015402174,0.00020841257,0.00016327594,0.0013787746,0.00085924653,0.0029138261],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021064136,0.000046298712,0.013731957,0.000050601844,0.00003683124,0.000038521815,0.9429311,0.00090021885,0.0000047022872,0.017648507,0.02359037,0.0009998083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031655343,0.000056102694,0.020801986,0.0005892761,0.00006693795,2.5422534e-7,0.028839968,0.00029753344,0.00002329892,0.079591796,0.86800516,0.0014111161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076454873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014513325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91409117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081091333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005859774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323787428","doi":"10.33137/ic.v23i.39891","title":"Straight from the Archives: Senator Peter Bosa’s Personal Archives to be Available Shortly for Consultation and Study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Italian Canadiana","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; History; Law; Political science; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03581684492157016,"score_gpt":0.2883930862210712,"score_spread":0.252576241299501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323787428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82046044,0.00094837486,0.00006243494,0.025796905,0.0008902484,0.0035877116,0.007050459,0.00008520571,0.14111821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97726816,0.0000018736822,0.00046098186,0.002000709,0.0002380435,0.000244932,0.000043686246,0.000018073231,0.019723518],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845093,0.00026852638,0.00015800838,0.00035957503,0.0003538795,0.00040908938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985822,0.0007876274,0.000047853286,0.00017449964,0.000020428148,0.00038738025],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025927278,0.00011815385,0.00013819254,0.00007626834,0.0013882959,0.00018501343,0.00036820516,0.000020619475,0.0014620555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027577346,0.000107520194,0.00005022678,0.00019300044,0.00028136198,0.00009649116,0.000071216215,0.00016465147,0.00001617873],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047203688,0.000043008276,0.0057069627,0.0000032589637,0.00007559814,0.000027800148,0.93791145,0.000008052577,0.000041284184,0.0042584725,0.05015656,0.0017203708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003140595,0.00013893419,0.0040967576,0.0000037911313,0.000034189005,5.422183e-7,0.15597413,0.00009875335,0.0000042076585,0.0007573221,0.8384133,0.00016400237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07332101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3291875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78825676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012124682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006148678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365813841","doi":"10.1163/17087384-bja10076","title":"The Conundrum of Two Fellows in The Same Ship: A Comparative Legal Analysis of The Duplicity of Damages in South Africa","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Plaintiff; Law; Common law; Equity (law); Political science; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Delict; Comparative law; Private law; Black letter law; History","score_opus":0.0871911255752702,"score_gpt":0.3845308382580939,"score_spread":0.2973397126828237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365813841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97789806,0.004175926,0.000006587532,0.00463446,0.00023809276,0.0003093603,0.00004395675,0.0000072747434,0.012686276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991615,0.00018818637,0.0000500635,0.00003266935,0.00008259514,0.000010174789,2.7112256e-7,0.0000073306587,0.00046721305],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950746,0.0017577359,0.0012221697,0.00017871133,0.0013140513,0.00045269483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941271,0.003355125,0.0014940326,0.00036852795,0.000597863,0.000057351845],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005128823,0.0001923364,0.0011061752,0.00042636335,0.0004251081,0.000060506543,0.0015704636,0.000052354793,0.0000089816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018659955,0.00009600118,0.0004849284,0.0065965303,0.0028987257,0.00023336668,0.0002859109,0.0005506029,0.0000016381292],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012841988,0.00012593537,0.085119106,0.000014746756,0.0012352533,0.000020527681,0.89517426,0.0018008378,0.00011892607,0.015555755,0.0006170054,0.00008924311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070560107,0.00024277085,0.09223199,0.000119285745,0.00071223755,0.0000010205542,0.8869652,0.00015595548,0.00023730053,0.0018676353,0.016592812,0.00016819847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029092846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016577054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02126343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014011472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002745569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372234371","doi":"10.55016/zgcw1834","title":"A Common Hunger: Land Rights in Canada and South Africa","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Goddard Space Flight Center; University of Toronto; Canada Council for the Arts; Alberta Foundation for the Arts; Government of Canada; Canadian Bar Association; University of the Western Cape; University of Ottawa; University of Oxford; National Geographic Society","keywords":"Indigenous; Dignity; Poverty; Context (archaeology); Political science; Geography; Human rights; Development economics; Land tenure; Economic growth; Economic Justice; Indigenous rights; Law; Ecology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01326468657479048,"score_gpt":0.19636858333354174,"score_spread":0.18310389675875124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4372234371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008916934,0.00054073054,0.0000065983204,0.000006939325,0.000101631,0.0003128372,0.000084633546,0.000028413886,0.99802655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.080576755,0.000007736905,0.00013804654,0.000010078678,0.000057910314,3.0256052e-7,0.000017329608,0.000010679464,0.91918117],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985336,0.00016842446,0.00017278889,0.00029888103,0.0005053815,0.00032089808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991904,0.00014385556,0.00020261541,0.00024281978,0.00006340356,0.00015690766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014283248,0.00018854681,0.00044050158,0.00010417177,0.00024735226,0.000020424832,0.00048301963,0.00028529417,0.000035515575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007795441,0.00022378589,0.000059854883,0.000021462743,0.00058515614,0.000055716966,0.00020284239,0.000372169,0.0000017595788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051065214,0.00008687331,0.008278402,0.0005499351,0.00032644853,0.003026736,0.5415664,0.00002805171,0.000001741462,0.34535453,0.09450404,0.0057662292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003609144,0.000013983673,0.00022534018,0.00010061166,0.000064494554,2.762824e-7,0.00025910142,0.0000150829665,0.000001829762,0.0012990958,0.9974185,0.00024077593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9949607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90291446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007232434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016951326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9125724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4375831770","doi":"10.47348/tsar/2023/i2a5","title":"A cause of action raising a triable issue in a class action: reconsidering the certification threshold","year":2023,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"Tydskrif vir die suid-afrikaanse reg","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.32645404877734413,"score_gpt":0.3997789358053836,"score_spread":0.07332488702803946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4375831770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9002498,0.0060436777,0.0001732312,0.023971999,0.005892711,0.002845023,0.00007978058,0.0008000618,0.05994376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97927755,0.001974833,0.00009858371,0.00010260688,0.001222694,0.00014893882,0.000026758491,0.00009494256,0.017053116],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940275,0.0011010502,0.001457115,0.0009743457,0.0011982169,0.0012417934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99615234,0.0013299469,0.0007961472,0.001215723,0.00029372124,0.00021214035],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004202942,0.0005112781,0.0008148311,0.00060720457,0.00092312525,0.00036014777,0.0008101334,0.00064805575,0.00038031742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012747686,0.00045955396,0.00032668427,0.003998944,0.0008738701,0.0010172928,0.00023085825,0.0009694773,0.0009367021],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019960664,0.0011065853,0.0136378715,0.0015748771,0.00080880855,0.0002927395,0.7875061,0.009372941,0.059551034,0.006724463,0.061152477,0.05627604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002235527,0.00023109835,0.0031320145,0.0010702435,0.00041786188,0.0000123640275,0.06661774,0.006325036,0.027153261,0.0057820664,0.8857947,0.001228068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008000691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011317956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82464224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000786324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005530539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380630800","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.207","title":"The Impact of the Private Security Industry Regulation Act and other Legislative Frameworks on Private Securities Operating in Drinking Establishments in South Africa","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Legislature; Business; Private security; Private sector; CLARITY; Duty; Finance; Public administration; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.044022791377502354,"score_gpt":0.35417308816280346,"score_spread":0.3101502967853011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380630800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954342,0.00049747416,0.000008290455,0.0015235145,0.00043866519,0.00010227606,0.0000069289786,0.000002822824,0.0019858172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995998,0.00003424754,0.000041697163,0.00016129274,0.000118993295,0.0000060560583,4.5730604e-7,0.000004877787,0.00003258974],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794686,0.0011014091,0.00036991306,0.00011265145,0.0002724204,0.00019672824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860805,0.0007479936,0.00045404982,0.00007184403,0.00009205336,0.000025992846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013313156,0.00008309859,0.00018128683,0.00013713377,0.0003551941,0.000037571248,0.00044512466,0.00029626,0.000047543923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008858491,0.000054995595,0.000056143446,0.000050331364,0.0010039423,0.0001493789,0.00023472185,0.001760164,1.307242e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084861415,0.00003438292,0.38716233,9.703592e-7,0.000058861566,0.00000729765,0.504383,0.0007142119,0.000025031297,0.10719871,0.000013532811,0.0003167742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010346848,0.00030394824,0.5574796,0.000086647815,0.0000143970765,0.000017526123,0.0271276,0.00029777348,0.000042301697,0.40994963,0.0035201197,0.00012573307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001865867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029621415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47725543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002360144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013124292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76471347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384451809","doi":"10.47348/sacj/v36/i1a5","title":"The adequacy of rape criminalisation in modern South Africa: A comparative study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; CLARITY; Law; Criminology; Political science; Criminal law; Sexual assault; Sentence; Sociology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics","score_opus":0.12725805060837075,"score_gpt":0.3789522234718644,"score_spread":0.25169417286349366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384451809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852547,0.0009484635,0.00063503435,0.00037599978,0.0007693793,0.0005474477,0.000020132507,0.000044964385,0.011403893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987103,0.000022491875,0.00035645138,0.00001985119,0.00046606868,0.000016375849,8.2206617e-7,0.000023080658,0.0003845592],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99453324,0.0014905732,0.0012223838,0.00028102906,0.0017515233,0.0007212761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99543005,0.0016940137,0.0012909506,0.00034607164,0.0009546191,0.00028431622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004864631,0.0002508016,0.0006383971,0.0005397972,0.0006718263,0.00015210053,0.0011681723,0.00009863793,0.000026955237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028858506,0.00018910125,0.00021135292,0.0020229227,0.00085866306,0.0003960709,0.00013554814,0.00064831186,0.000040964787],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006017992,0.00018922807,0.0014027247,0.00005645054,0.00006939695,0.000100126665,0.9934066,0.000927709,0.000042026048,0.0022140965,0.00014103492,0.00084883743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009099061,0.0006535352,0.0029549468,0.00007428118,0.0010359641,0.000003042499,0.99098784,0.00043731867,0.000030185527,0.0012662807,0.0014456239,0.00020108421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015285453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017405192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0134556135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020685514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063099957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7711325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385241220","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v25i1.16525","title":"SENTENCING OF PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLERS IN CANADA. LESSONS FOR SOUTH AFRICA?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Seriousness; Punishment (psychology); Prison; Criminology; Legislation; Sentence; Attendance; Political science; Service (business); Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Business","score_opus":0.08449379811015129,"score_gpt":0.33569306580244274,"score_spread":0.25119926769229145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385241220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96309537,0.0000942146,0.00008720024,0.0033796444,0.00048353765,0.00034336734,0.000094639385,0.00007016883,0.032351863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974855,0.000002810457,0.00035076053,0.000082162005,0.000065120264,0.000027402859,0.000003192358,0.000006897676,0.0019761636],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899954,0.000073981624,0.00015820863,0.00015756249,0.0002454505,0.00036526617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951833,0.00021201187,0.00004999275,0.00010797822,0.000045974146,0.00006570889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004618412,0.00005873276,0.00013870085,0.00006151601,0.000085646665,0.000013103414,0.00018248465,0.000054110067,0.00006342137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004107414,0.000052023894,0.00004067012,0.0004811826,0.00009060786,0.000048758557,0.000047245496,0.00007553601,0.000019962536],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003932136,0.000037387956,0.11625015,0.000053801934,0.000017083361,0.00013358273,0.85128444,0.00024381619,0.0008198368,0.011853949,0.016544346,0.002722261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011765542,0.00007613915,0.05801909,0.00012740199,0.00003306686,5.9599387e-7,0.3439007,0.0008717597,0.0005669847,0.0041001244,0.5904961,0.0006314766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3459341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70597494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5739518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021527313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004559486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6584214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385309200","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v44i2.16558","title":"THE CONFLICT BETWEEN CERTAIN CAPITAL ALLOWANCES IN THE INCOME TAX ACT AND THE SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONES POLICY OBJECTIVES","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Business; Capital (architecture); Public economics; Property tax; Allowance (engineering); Context (archaeology); Income tax; Incentive; Tax policy; Economic policy; Economics; Tax reform; Market economy; Law; Operations management; Political science","score_opus":0.01805645931809351,"score_gpt":0.3217493208971571,"score_spread":0.30369286157906356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385309200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86955506,0.00034488708,4.923535e-7,0.025424458,0.00041538934,0.00043251622,0.000028427297,0.000038939543,0.10375986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99075663,0.00020169577,0.000006209204,0.00025400807,0.004977326,0.00004925045,0.0000022114102,0.000009799405,0.0037428504],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983403,0.00064564124,0.00019389436,0.00019532944,0.00023082031,0.00039403472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751407,0.0021183225,0.00007986772,0.000228093,0.000015477735,0.000044173372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017705221,0.000116308984,0.00017125218,0.000068026406,0.00085759617,0.00042648416,0.0006860649,0.00007109727,0.000054244094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035969916,0.000055606193,0.000070690985,0.00032608857,0.0015467472,0.00020381733,0.00014159596,0.00021074591,0.00023882787],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041039548,0.0000057176826,0.08804949,0.0000031358693,0.00003739561,0.0000054790244,0.8011456,0.0000053545427,0.0000016607011,0.10539734,0.002249942,0.0030578563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005798387,0.000026387177,0.22139855,0.000009657052,0.000013317186,5.607717e-7,0.04435979,0.000015188917,0.0000072650446,0.021631368,0.7118012,0.00015693095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009450409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011491003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7567858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009896024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013731093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518158","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1148","title":"The First Years of the South African Constitutional Court","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional court; Constitution; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Dignity; Democracy; High Court; Charter; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.0383977175940013,"score_gpt":0.2967878873949738,"score_spread":0.2583901698009725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019478257,0.23628996,0.00006139282,0.04585323,0.002079574,0.002236182,0.0001247583,0.00014874157,0.71125835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820002,0.0149760805,0.000088426066,0.0013712067,0.00020883488,0.000032085474,0.0000014117899,0.000008418312,0.0013133421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979858,0.00026243745,0.0003562805,0.00018833633,0.00087934494,0.00032781647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986439,0.00030566443,0.00020890437,0.00053148525,0.00021804663,0.00009203894],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011458268,0.00011247651,0.00027056632,0.000009420197,0.0014755779,0.00002918284,0.0009725111,0.000060840026,0.00026995374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008023885,0.00006954028,0.00021998274,0.00042205025,0.0061538233,0.00009888338,0.00013615054,0.00019928392,0.00018423102],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046552086,0.00003142963,0.002075595,0.00012919215,0.000037057915,0.0000065629824,0.012607466,0.0000033395322,0.0000010409176,0.94826096,0.036380026,0.00046269072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007772508,0.000007693183,0.000486604,0.00043954834,0.000043597927,0.000003304641,0.00021639194,0.0000011397552,0.000003830798,0.0005885768,0.9980373,0.0000943016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058719685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072824536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98005235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009172032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004758909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385559301","doi":"10.55662/jadr.2023.2301","title":"MEDIATING INDIGENOUS DISPUTES: LESSONS FROM AFRICA AND CANADA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Alternate Dispute Resolution","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Indigenous; Conciliation; Political science; Legislature; Alternative dispute resolution; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.030116810358855932,"score_gpt":0.3158946660343224,"score_spread":0.2857778556754665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385559301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.986349,0.0027192147,0.000339025,0.0040751663,0.002052564,0.00012820493,0.0000865122,0.00005261091,0.0041977153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99662226,0.0012938462,0.0005040635,0.0000532965,0.0011396676,0.0000020825748,0.0000080027685,0.000014740566,0.00036204339],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783385,0.00020556025,0.00041900092,0.00015958872,0.0009346215,0.00044736874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858624,0.00037191756,0.00046265626,0.00012234606,0.00016891283,0.00028794206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090151076,0.000113044254,0.00023123066,0.00013628771,0.00047287648,0.00011826289,0.0003803621,0.00007813258,0.00001686267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063654006,0.000102475875,0.000064033404,0.0003609339,0.00012475382,0.00033673315,0.00009657295,0.0002811497,0.000011454131],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021118669,0.00016026836,0.08865665,0.00007347125,0.0006248118,0.0022267373,0.8004727,0.0018040439,0.0021957112,0.00925613,0.028459525,0.065858796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015446295,0.00020930577,0.06890788,0.00035688758,0.00020230189,0.00002473899,0.027984748,0.0026929525,0.00034703422,0.009112788,0.8878995,0.000717201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60074836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41943005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007671246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5911638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385869228","doi":"10.59962/9780774855181-009","title":"A Comparative History of “Cultural Rights” in South Africa and Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography; Ethnology; Anthropology; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.03853571102527205,"score_gpt":0.219121988359897,"score_spread":0.18058627733462496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385869228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040796674,0.0019220249,0.000001655034,0.0000019872293,0.0001891361,0.0003415645,0.00039771572,0.000019734274,0.9930465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31687135,0.00001822928,0.00013351062,0.0000051544666,0.000024951745,1.5962779e-7,0.0000046344585,0.0000057458738,0.68293625],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859023,0.00007042928,0.00023157659,0.00031441753,0.00053548417,0.0002578421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895656,0.00009981574,0.0003502014,0.00015996989,0.0002795397,0.0001539261],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017145975,0.000115452654,0.0005620211,0.000052973333,0.00013549328,0.00002708112,0.00039513782,0.000286772,0.00023763262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013062804,0.00024696416,0.00007876467,0.000010494238,0.001874747,0.00007865908,0.00015546712,0.00031401243,6.6860537e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089076755,0.0000404911,0.00022279719,0.00017848116,0.00022254074,0.0010672463,0.8042332,0.0000025262352,0.0000025403695,0.022547368,0.169906,0.0014877046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038197945,0.000025712534,0.00013318674,0.000273264,0.000050717754,0.0000012139926,0.004703596,0.0000019280467,4.122936e-7,0.000342661,0.9938387,0.00024660688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99786544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8239327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010623089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009797434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386363116","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4545155","title":"R c Yombo: Affirming and Obscuring the De Minimis Defense","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Physics; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.017053405909346016,"score_gpt":0.3035604748882661,"score_spread":0.2865070689789201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386363116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96027315,0.010136708,0.00042975563,0.008056601,0.00043272422,0.00015787288,0.000001151227,0.00017712165,0.020334907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99156606,0.003760901,0.000070376605,0.00008826139,0.0006495963,0.0000046737196,2.4345863e-7,0.000015485231,0.0038443785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968774,0.0002524111,0.00014501091,0.00013404271,0.00033359218,0.002257599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993653,0.00028250858,0.00007727917,0.0001146439,0.000041031693,0.000119199336],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00436979,0.00008771524,0.000098764336,0.000068082605,0.0014220692,0.00017493598,0.00035307134,0.000068568166,0.00002032489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061800267,0.00006552307,0.000064129854,0.00043296575,0.00021139935,0.00015934197,0.000070160284,0.0011112288,0.00007001678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035284036,0.000021025586,0.019291794,0.0000089966115,0.0001710111,0.00005478661,0.34718633,0.0001040207,0.00016487406,0.58343494,0.0007463147,0.04878064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005577779,0.000117586176,0.0021894933,0.00003839995,0.00008550478,0.00019394068,0.16532725,0.0005378301,0.000044279506,0.50476205,0.32577035,0.00037551482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052758586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029463863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32502404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005737169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012484838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386519887","doi":"10.1515/9781772126716-007","title":"5. Human Rights and Canadian Municipalities","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Alberta Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.03038491694147247,"score_gpt":0.23854957327255888,"score_spread":0.2081646563310864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386519887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00048259183,0.00018900157,9.262867e-8,0.000056240893,0.00011907006,0.00022061425,0.000086491,0.000022559732,0.99882334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.057563607,0.000012947952,0.00003315434,0.000020265814,0.000054469434,2.0911614e-7,0.000014949067,0.000015285386,0.9422851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893486,0.00007689018,0.0001144261,0.00027319067,0.0003226344,0.00027798893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990479,0.00012064383,0.00014333882,0.00032325878,0.000066274704,0.00029860187],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013167124,0.00016810598,0.0002821669,0.00016575353,0.0016226068,0.000029117362,0.0006409427,0.00025704037,0.0033443503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008672518,0.00022227703,0.000092225884,0.000006233059,0.0011831,0.00008041885,0.00027931647,0.00031497263,0.000009117557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041881767,0.000001762465,0.000004012377,0.00001244637,0.000057023004,0.000026808219,0.19404769,4.834819e-7,1.4737931e-7,0.8033012,0.0024882362,0.000055991728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012967961,0.000025823327,0.0000024812896,0.000036863374,0.00009062288,3.673522e-7,0.0014893175,6.352048e-7,0.0000011996322,0.007999301,0.989994,0.00022970092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9950537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99083465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9875058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024591925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022508988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386739929","doi":"10.47348/tsar/2023/i4a9","title":"Regspraak: Onderhoudskostes vir koekoekskuikens – wie moet vir die gelag betaal, of rus die skade maar waar dit val?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tydskrif vir die suid-afrikaanse reg","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wife; Ignorance; Power of attorney; Theology; Philosophy; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Genealogy; Political science; History","score_opus":0.039843535560902976,"score_gpt":0.32977217336739556,"score_spread":0.2899286378064926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386739929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7159536,0.021823741,0.0002654168,0.014951926,0.0066189705,0.0038922215,0.0013488932,0.0046400046,0.23050526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9485806,0.0063002235,0.0010260293,0.00037681987,0.001971614,0.00025055243,0.0001701453,0.000350132,0.04097386],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887322,0.0012760425,0.0018604308,0.0019105845,0.0031375994,0.0030831504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99312866,0.001824773,0.0008910223,0.0024024092,0.0005966742,0.0011564576],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033433132,0.0012056889,0.001803298,0.0007885202,0.0017608413,0.00041352108,0.0027598334,0.0011078379,0.00089704915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026730422,0.0011703669,0.00094656367,0.002330942,0.0026931127,0.0013034603,0.0010607978,0.0012485086,0.003648333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017737327,0.003148625,0.049892206,0.001788407,0.0032301103,0.003021635,0.68042016,0.00067331636,0.029059399,0.054842316,0.13127238,0.040877696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016558758,0.00050766725,0.0050566723,0.00037917017,0.0004544775,0.0000075501375,0.01046468,0.00017574833,0.009691313,0.0068233525,0.96296084,0.0018226507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055150418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048601176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83168846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006658868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007622411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387402060","doi":"10.1080/00020184.2023.2261386","title":"The High Court Ruling Against Ingonyama Trust: Implications for South Africa’s Land Governance Policy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Indigenous; Indigenous rights; Land tenure; Law; Land law; Politics; Corporate governance; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.061763956144264255,"score_gpt":0.36561232708731417,"score_spread":0.3038483709430499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387402060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3447839,0.02338741,0.00017871801,0.29307732,0.003522645,0.0043520196,0.0018236135,0.0029109025,0.32596347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854689,0.0016038407,0.0003291669,0.00019842667,0.001175617,0.0005061629,0.0000053416256,0.000030214662,0.01068229],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804574,0.0001059673,0.00030293758,0.0003544283,0.00037234428,0.0008185736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99726564,0.0016624583,0.00022841823,0.00040241497,0.0003191775,0.00012186656],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009527932,0.00018409516,0.0002891056,0.000071711205,0.0034003071,0.00016714146,0.0006586187,0.00005074794,0.000002307007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004223203,0.0001365853,0.000121504905,0.0015413514,0.00088799786,0.00012803443,0.00025548428,0.00013739272,0.000101393955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026122752,0.000025703916,0.006479347,0.000021865873,0.00025739346,0.0000037770421,0.68774647,0.000060281684,0.00001951765,0.25885433,0.04014177,0.006363403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027100832,0.00003175004,0.007745655,0.000020006739,0.000040026713,1.7359741e-7,0.116768524,0.000028385168,0.0000054300517,0.017340899,0.85751504,0.00023312269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006794498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008581739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8173733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003131709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023316157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99789715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387986340","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4586986","title":"South West Terminal Ltd. v Achter Land: Contractual and Evidential Implications","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Terminal (telecommunication); Geography; Engineering","score_opus":0.01711396575549169,"score_gpt":0.3209821736075516,"score_spread":0.3038682078520599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387986340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9759153,0.0023300292,0.0013751001,0.011224617,0.00062169426,0.00031828438,0.00001736018,0.0002420668,0.00795551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99196035,0.0011280251,0.00004211398,0.000101988415,0.0012218617,0.000010754566,0.000004091296,0.000017830956,0.005513012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997029,0.00017890176,0.00023325928,0.00021035314,0.00036660748,0.0019819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930555,0.0001460855,0.00012824286,0.00013997311,0.0000926418,0.0001875159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021726727,0.00011843877,0.00015452763,0.0001314727,0.0010048851,0.0002712758,0.00036753537,0.00010749738,0.000119256365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029668646,0.000107469496,0.00007925892,0.0003420908,0.0002446439,0.0003485143,0.00006678067,0.001102993,0.00033921696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018457173,0.00015069645,0.17885523,0.00001685703,0.0004765815,0.0000802609,0.2540676,0.000025691197,0.000578576,0.479458,0.0034661067,0.08263981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031642658,0.00061818905,0.08996788,0.000076170574,0.00038648015,0.0006209435,0.071671836,0.000115087,0.00003878738,0.3735895,0.45854557,0.0012053042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039009308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00251816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45507947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037798693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014952987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7728865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388641977","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4601795","title":"Extension of Arbitration Agreements to Non-Parties under Nigerian Law: A Review of Metroline Nigeria Limited v. Alhaji Mukhtar Mohammed Dikko","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Extension (predicate logic); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05346153276809968,"score_gpt":0.3815544882078853,"score_spread":0.3280929554397856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388641977","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000083889354,0.9947497,0.00045720275,0.0005003286,0.0006728326,0.0015234856,0.00003288642,0.00005319042,0.0019264393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027550552,0.9941894,0.00019718384,0.000342911,0.0006632611,0.000068621215,0.00005506962,0.00009598957,0.0016325465],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992203,0.001205386,0.002177021,0.0005150819,0.0015231187,0.0023763753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99612755,0.0003026118,0.0019970865,0.000601861,0.00067523064,0.000295678],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076871016,0.00052140205,0.0025989753,0.00048289145,0.000383875,0.000066937406,0.0010520039,0.00039132018,0.00010777794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012597499,0.0004336141,0.0008992753,0.002003078,0.00026641565,0.0002680339,0.00016233718,0.0018266655,0.000129646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034429904,0.0012914886,0.000040654708,0.12124701,0.00880616,0.000071276896,0.031850018,0.00004878268,0.00021034603,0.31914508,0.0055461926,0.5113987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036121224,0.0004986883,0.0000029383013,0.06499223,0.0013149151,0.000019286179,0.0021806343,0.0000023184691,0.000014763788,0.013315289,0.91669005,0.00060766836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014313962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007870498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91114384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017608019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005499019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389726401","doi":"10.4337/9781803921327.00026","title":"Afro-centric law and technology discourse","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cape Town; National Research Foundation; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fondations communautaires du Canada; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025234994072821922,"score_gpt":0.2850567588394379,"score_spread":0.25982176476661595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389726401","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000026131816,0.0010734011,0.000011961724,0.0058769863,0.0025559808,0.000520832,0.0000870737,0.0014607626,0.98838687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027543895,0.0000983581,0.00035113306,0.00050111813,0.0020369233,0.00003532892,0.000037406928,0.00019081662,0.969205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996504,0.00008476774,0.00047048295,0.00088023324,0.0011373427,0.0009231737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789935,0.0003103203,0.00035157442,0.0007364406,0.00031617077,0.00038616153],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013113368,0.0004678861,0.0006085198,0.00069236115,0.00095559243,0.002461731,0.0013712961,0.0016183382,0.00021166097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011143746,0.00048073137,0.00015058971,0.00018547488,0.0023324701,0.0008017287,0.00085486606,0.0017184099,0.0005361616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046780046,0.0000054718203,0.000024297347,0.000024939358,0.000070580885,0.000105990126,0.013819807,1.194219e-7,0.000001315537,0.9480163,0.02883537,0.009091163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016194816,0.000022986005,0.0000012749874,0.00013842933,0.00006709605,0.0000024566896,0.0010603023,0.0000012201489,0.0000045054826,0.19363698,0.8044737,0.00042908668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013187781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029965264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77563834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002990728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047847416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390017459","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4656632","title":"The Prudent Parliament and Section 24(1)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"TransCanada (Canada); Institute on Governance; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Business; Politics; Advertising","score_opus":0.013413319702996541,"score_gpt":0.29945608356687686,"score_spread":0.28604276386388033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390017459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8664413,0.026823875,0.00092703075,0.045529045,0.00694383,0.00069682713,0.0000022075874,0.0004677748,0.0521681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96058947,0.018017793,0.000008896447,0.000043253163,0.0010240936,0.000008103663,3.0828346e-7,0.000008755218,0.020299321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975233,0.00019254653,0.00013707222,0.000109954686,0.00042853068,0.0016085609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958944,0.000112702735,0.00007526709,0.00008903207,0.000048463695,0.00008509924],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038022415,0.00006465453,0.00006502195,0.00004389231,0.0017240298,0.0002405902,0.00023441242,0.0000513508,0.00001403295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018137594,0.00004488106,0.000042399468,0.00031886654,0.00016357472,0.00013444772,0.000045811543,0.00088905235,0.000083946565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004332443,0.000028874947,0.00660181,0.000002973182,0.0001495105,0.000008634728,0.06743718,0.00002688852,0.00009078918,0.829275,0.006799063,0.08953594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016722227,0.000087155095,0.00054889644,0.0000054883517,0.000012922048,0.000015687463,0.039951902,0.000023573657,0.0000096276735,0.18032119,0.7787755,0.00008079913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040539933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006739371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7719765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083047844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088717474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390831749","doi":"10.1080/09649069.2024.2304980","title":"Administrative law values, homelessness and mandatory orders","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.025798740528436035,"score_gpt":0.3336687290508605,"score_spread":0.3078699885224244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390831749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3489048,0.025206916,0.0000720378,0.018450333,0.0028043608,0.0002952864,0.000086821165,0.00012075751,0.6040587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99791354,0.00028221135,0.000114851486,0.0004561722,0.00085414597,0.0000017325394,0.0000010385588,0.000014477673,0.00036186018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987245,0.00016530343,0.00028239266,0.00015391335,0.00043928463,0.00023455892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994009,0.00011094328,0.00011686883,0.000046213863,0.00015605694,0.00016900769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006820109,0.00012278055,0.0002840149,0.000051422547,0.0010187476,0.00039013172,0.0001554954,0.00015884331,0.000056597622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002929005,0.00010538192,0.00008974029,0.0001906305,0.0012151763,0.00053246587,0.00004529505,0.00033006753,0.0000043505697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028548411,0.00002048474,0.0000808489,0.00003816038,0.00006911618,0.00013009834,0.09287338,9.519595e-8,0.00002282519,0.90340704,0.000871997,0.0024573992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002445561,0.00010756065,0.0009816348,0.000042835174,0.0000728295,0.0000058021824,0.055493984,0.000001329622,0.000010570461,0.012400958,0.9304915,0.00014645445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006784313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058437313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9296195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074097276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015266325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7835486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390928461","doi":"10.1080/00083968.2023.2286227","title":"Governing street trading in post-apartheid Cape Town: neo-colonial or neo-liberal order?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Temporalities; Rationality; Colonialism; Political economy; Sociology; Politics; Liberalism; Liberalization; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03959951355023242,"score_gpt":0.28755135658762926,"score_spread":0.24795184303739684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390928461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93706715,0.029002147,0.000015218016,0.010039505,0.0036012563,0.00053862325,0.00026495062,0.000093738505,0.019377394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928413,0.0005583786,0.0011783949,0.00028038144,0.0020017622,0.000031943982,0.0000054186353,0.00008986786,0.003012573],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995152,0.00041825225,0.0012243143,0.00062060286,0.0004195421,0.0021652821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947413,0.001282765,0.00042278244,0.00034925598,0.0011825841,0.0020213102],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020074088,0.00055391,0.0011440207,0.0012008911,0.0011536377,0.00049959694,0.0012126369,0.00023326615,0.0003304031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006213475,0.0004884209,0.0003207012,0.003616052,0.0015758546,0.0009151966,0.00008893538,0.0008861238,0.000018167004],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015873565,0.0000466405,0.007176542,0.00028123774,0.0008730154,0.013181582,0.93958324,0.00035048093,0.000057647932,0.020991512,0.006224809,0.011074576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005766792,0.00078544085,0.0014782319,0.0011527104,0.00024237324,0.00024479278,0.20539737,0.0001636234,0.000005464007,0.0015918248,0.7875237,0.0008378055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1494049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.978984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82957906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005308776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005535646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391108915","doi":"10.1080/00083968.2023.2288157","title":"Diamonds, risk and insurance practices in British Africa, with an emphasis on the Gold Coast and Tanganyika","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Basel","keywords":"Gold coast; Emphasis (telecommunications); Geography; History; Development economics; Archaeology; Economics; Engineering; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.04101963160399418,"score_gpt":0.2798529061356244,"score_spread":0.23883327453163022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391108915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93029803,0.060179733,0.0000026721,0.0050640185,0.0003330147,0.00030649928,0.00017538657,0.000026235552,0.0036144173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99304646,0.005447498,0.00039060315,0.00011503512,0.00042672968,0.00003380039,7.420082e-7,0.000048044243,0.000491066],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99708545,0.0005908081,0.0005433746,0.0005085039,0.00026916116,0.0010027251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955579,0.0018471987,0.0005375961,0.00028429806,0.0005342046,0.0012387858],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002362014,0.00031557356,0.000614079,0.00052902027,0.001041492,0.00076130923,0.000586034,0.00011006591,0.000015941947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004923797,0.00025387653,0.000077974226,0.0017607417,0.0029693774,0.00084869296,0.00005212512,0.00066648854,0.0000016339179],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071908114,0.000050397335,0.079019465,0.00017268528,0.00049859454,0.004460201,0.8623116,0.00004570793,0.000007181158,0.016052863,0.0013582476,0.03595117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035511528,0.001155258,0.035571758,0.0014039095,0.0002302614,0.00037425297,0.52280277,0.000034446028,0.0000021451146,0.0036467165,0.4338118,0.0006115354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23503338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9870377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7520043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008826142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089218264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391427397","doi":"10.55667/10.55667/ijede.2023.v38.i2.1309","title":"Tomorrow Never Comes, But It [Education] Gives You Hope","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of e-learning & distance education","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Context (archaeology); Higher education; Perspective (graphical); Qualitative research; Narrative inquiry; Pedagogy; Sociology; Psychology; Medical education; Political science; Gender studies; Medicine; Geography; Social science","score_opus":0.012996786989571674,"score_gpt":0.3568907190929071,"score_spread":0.3438939321033354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391427397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21699643,0.04492356,0.01802181,0.18871306,0.11085929,0.0006745668,0.000048554954,0.00039638174,0.41936636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9273128,0.00044774616,0.0015172157,0.000539913,0.0041972767,0.000009471172,0.000020586873,0.000022673077,0.065932356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977372,0.00022439635,0.0005088618,0.00021824587,0.0010900953,0.00022119202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977411,0.00026050644,0.0003979073,0.00012228894,0.0013040111,0.00017420371],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008675728,0.00013885468,0.00016336734,0.0003346179,0.0002443029,0.00070727366,0.0007636643,0.00008828744,0.0011840701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015197622,0.00013215176,0.00015185495,0.0003977046,0.00019828159,0.0015733531,0.0000415833,0.0005347616,0.00021048416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012047518,0.00070183526,0.017819809,0.000057456775,0.0003031776,0.000044326887,0.21874087,0.00033334948,0.00031546585,0.484767,0.16227192,0.11452434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009011174,0.000032579395,0.0017385862,0.0004039145,0.000030860283,0.000019196204,0.030739563,0.000043345135,0.00003746816,0.0029502672,0.96376824,0.00014586316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037549634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007388345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8014963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008475369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032745409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391718414","doi":"10.21991/cf29465","title":"Weaving Section 33 into the Charter Project","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Weaving; Section (typography); Charter; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Law; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.022622506655428528,"score_gpt":0.3215545900362177,"score_spread":0.2989320833807892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391718414","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004930888,0.011997548,0.112162665,0.056839973,0.027750019,0.0024396412,0.00025573588,0.0021172613,0.78150624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920125,0.00013912407,0.0006651354,0.0010156848,0.0017961897,0.00023030424,0.000047899808,0.0000167545,0.004076398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968037,0.00022606016,0.00049934606,0.0006461447,0.00091828394,0.0009064426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986199,0.00041306482,0.000094571886,0.00039583625,0.0002888,0.0001877979],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010967379,0.00031998794,0.00024681317,0.0003120173,0.0046510333,0.0007682683,0.00060537626,0.0002859152,0.00047988567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007355509,0.00024798393,0.00029313,0.0011803384,0.010150311,0.0014179104,0.00020051439,0.0006349364,0.0010516717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016632308,0.000034526718,0.0013840931,0.000023476463,0.00007743102,0.000035466994,0.0129261175,0.0000667602,0.00012160199,0.9593671,0.02343439,0.0025124028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022749805,0.000027743974,0.000035324847,0.00019738493,0.00006176924,0.00005910936,0.010871567,0.0006339154,0.000083226034,0.018893505,0.9685576,0.00035138908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018178677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015142085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98708165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074114837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037533347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391796847","doi":"10.7202/1100543ar","title":"THE ABROGATION AND RESTORATION OF THE RULE OF LAW AND JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE IN SOUTH AFRICA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Rule of law; Political science; Judicial independence; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.019443176660146583,"score_gpt":0.2854330129203918,"score_spread":0.2659898362602452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391796847","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9197819,0.00017315838,0.000026651112,0.0017644992,0.00032892835,0.0001860136,0.00002405081,0.000018160386,0.07769664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992946,0.000050885228,0.000043715,0.000034984896,0.00010356187,0.000010765875,0.000001942476,0.0000041505446,0.00045539104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917465,0.000091637674,0.00019591828,0.00009250498,0.00033724937,0.000108057786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938136,0.0002369304,0.00015115274,0.000096769225,0.000108156,0.00002565266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000746866,0.000041596686,0.00007231172,0.00005452044,0.00015182399,0.00003492231,0.0002440335,0.000061945626,0.000005500323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006687546,0.000034508477,0.000023716373,0.00024260652,0.00036935584,0.00012281643,0.00006233035,0.00010252741,0.0000029206567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002439536,0.0000118447415,0.014053268,0.00001006165,0.000009097103,0.0000012747682,0.24223205,0.000059991096,0.00030016582,0.7425554,0.000027088709,0.00071538304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012567105,0.000101608704,0.2817163,0.0005186946,0.000057071567,0.0000056394338,0.034317948,0.006095269,0.0016539594,0.45507383,0.21879253,0.00041044687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043592397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011465042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28748155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009435819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011501677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65898955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391829277","doi":"10.35293/esi.18","title":"Thetha Sizwe: Contemporary South African Debates on African Languages and the Politics of Gender and Sexualities","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill-Queen's University Press","funders":"Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Human sexuality; Gender studies; Politics; Sociology; Anthropology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05538654389901528,"score_gpt":0.3290674640315581,"score_spread":0.27368092013254286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391829277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00052532455,0.005908096,0.000004124158,0.0011811563,0.00018030358,0.0005843621,0.000347046,0.00018969743,0.99107987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46218398,0.00009213403,0.000030904645,0.00021315979,0.00030395197,0.000015981163,0.000011640814,0.000037464553,0.53711075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975097,0.0005117727,0.00039831153,0.00041152554,0.0007377401,0.00043095235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99608916,0.002897375,0.0003070118,0.0004073201,0.00012127241,0.00017787876],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011910106,0.00032915975,0.00065734895,0.00015614834,0.0004429815,0.00015483948,0.0004476868,0.00032494427,0.00010667986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070713816,0.0002099934,0.00010387843,0.00015703967,0.0041949777,0.00008020017,0.00026870336,0.00039131506,0.000024570458],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028527493,0.0000087012195,0.000110117406,0.000081924176,0.00011277014,0.0000090274025,0.46824417,3.0528943e-7,2.523393e-7,0.52044785,0.010867271,0.00008905027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059807714,0.00009099122,0.00008640403,0.00008042573,0.00010940114,8.1007477e-7,0.5327474,0.0000044073354,0.000009375795,0.091701664,0.37414423,0.00042684496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036397942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026646716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46165866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000086726424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005942157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392423549","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.205","title":"Policing Intimate Partner Violence in the Witbank Policing Area","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Medical emergency; Domestic violence; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Forensic engineering; Medicine; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.07460170175104085,"score_gpt":0.3916594819470437,"score_spread":0.31705778019600284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392423549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97177607,0.00075332023,0.0001653146,0.018769471,0.000904049,0.000030827774,0.0000016855283,0.0000059833947,0.0075932513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99490637,0.00074493594,0.00025958568,0.0034450355,0.000562182,0.0000018843427,0.0000011537054,0.000003707556,0.000075144424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844736,0.0006376058,0.00033214068,0.00011117572,0.0002283035,0.00024340957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865806,0.0006701743,0.0002125118,0.00007449658,0.00034189972,0.000042850766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009340497,0.00007375573,0.0001950126,0.00012301677,0.00015337735,0.000036234716,0.0004822568,0.00017087646,0.00009124224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00096827827,0.000055287324,0.00006197886,0.000030134517,0.0009519524,0.00015093903,0.00008015694,0.00044902696,0.0000062460476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045247438,0.000056698886,0.05176067,0.000002957336,0.0000850537,0.00049805886,0.29609716,0.00003165792,0.00030789393,0.6465419,0.00030031623,0.004272388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012595211,0.00016367693,0.14915244,0.00015532236,0.000074679774,0.0008743408,0.030107189,0.00005323825,0.00041733627,0.78577024,0.0317245,0.00024749374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009942323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002174695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26598996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007908863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021541228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35075083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392815258","doi":"10.29173/jaed240","title":"Interview With The Nominees In CANDO’s Economic Developer Awards","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Aboriginal Economic Development","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Computer science; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.014212323103150282,"score_gpt":0.31949835976610347,"score_spread":0.3052860366629532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392815258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9439217,0.00077266444,0.00053043466,0.0061975713,0.0015549471,0.00023507274,0.0000022539846,0.000013636131,0.046771705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901482,0.00019639664,0.0068368968,0.00045726635,0.0005931938,0.000006373903,5.6890957e-7,0.000018523364,0.0017425657],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981656,0.00010252956,0.0008570975,0.00017622582,0.00022514573,0.00047341673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988568,0.00019988218,0.0005172306,0.00013480683,0.00009325663,0.00019804084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005185665,0.00017942545,0.00037583036,0.00022934448,0.00020112166,0.00012639377,0.00070567545,0.000073926945,0.00037108845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002514068,0.00012030746,0.00006856671,0.0001249376,0.00022461549,0.00041721395,0.000038419283,0.0003173244,0.00018400945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013439485,0.00029486744,0.18275723,0.000079094,0.00091306854,0.00070673705,0.58302826,0.0027005514,0.000029253932,0.04165812,0.036397375,0.15009147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006135429,0.0000464378,0.020224936,0.000069820824,0.000012572378,0.000025256257,0.005139781,0.000003768056,0.00014928766,0.000058305042,0.97346574,0.00019053392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071200746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025365356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9370684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031843956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004866906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392938312","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4744088","title":"Palpable and Enforceable: A Normative Framework for a Stronger Damages Remedy under Section 24(1) of the Charter","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Damages; Normative; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Advertising","score_opus":0.015353777911201566,"score_gpt":0.3091001661177299,"score_spread":0.2937463882065283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392938312","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36476916,0.06279914,0.465267,0.034854777,0.012742295,0.0033347656,0.000085739564,0.00038637468,0.055760734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99060166,0.0009376145,0.00031649886,0.00007228272,0.00080917624,0.000013999184,5.969809e-7,0.00001544448,0.0072327363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980839,0.00015777434,0.00021002897,0.00014081976,0.00032598226,0.0010814975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992879,0.00031608852,0.00011415329,0.00011955223,0.00010471353,0.0000575722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018589897,0.00010068145,0.0001386013,0.00006495533,0.00055399555,0.00017191743,0.00024207686,0.00012445898,0.00006215493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000270929,0.00006893077,0.000098789445,0.00034066796,0.00022233417,0.00037719193,0.000038618346,0.0012880582,0.000004419963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029402598,0.000015304078,0.0004935832,0.000024226176,0.00015929539,3.7309377e-7,0.05055656,0.00003928088,0.00006417772,0.9442846,0.0004968435,0.003836358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002464484,0.00021103889,0.00014583157,0.00017322728,0.00009453716,0.000015436257,0.047546066,0.00043291942,0.00013588244,0.8542189,0.096622236,0.0001574673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018662178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010089455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6258325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005479122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014195836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5596044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393015985","doi":"10.1515/9780791485842-010","title":"Affirmative Action as a Way to Overcome Disadvantage: Inspiration from Canadian Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SUNY Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantage; Affirmative action; Law; Action (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.06235362951171484,"score_gpt":0.33478608353961625,"score_spread":0.2724324540279014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393015985","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023384199,0.00061524374,0.00002345137,0.00015737841,0.0014879128,0.00095065363,0.0004789504,0.00015943842,0.9958931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39480567,0.000022957474,0.00014887723,0.0007293444,0.0015409922,0.00006488621,0.000085977525,0.000069556816,0.60253173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773175,0.00013199885,0.00033315446,0.0004629623,0.00072132074,0.0006188408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815226,0.00014283505,0.0002192476,0.00049478025,0.00015522493,0.0008356784],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026641865,0.00036738126,0.00037580603,0.00014063207,0.0006543048,0.00025690786,0.0005088962,0.00065106765,0.0010187405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000082124374,0.00039310212,0.0001307305,0.00001606513,0.00035369373,0.00040815995,0.00012997119,0.00055667333,0.001175144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021526077,0.000005437368,0.000007933514,0.000011090853,0.00005658571,0.000013558366,0.13047166,0.0000018506294,0.000021918691,0.85976523,0.00085707835,0.008766115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011397302,0.000032355274,0.000018866625,0.000088295885,0.00007856065,2.7695305e-7,0.00042329985,9.925145e-7,0.00018587032,0.017108245,0.98149264,0.0004566095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8300204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8050722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9806356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010223157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003045716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394703372","doi":"10.25071/hdveps73","title":"Shifting ground: New approaches to Charter analysis in the criminal context","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada Watch","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Context (archaeology); Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.10661858684562299,"score_gpt":0.27774926760301777,"score_spread":0.1711306807573948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394703372","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68915194,0.00031169265,0.0000630204,0.14809993,0.00019119437,0.00035746561,0.000009732006,0.00003117475,0.16178386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98569655,0.000002215064,0.000136558,0.0031725345,0.00033019177,0.000013794922,0.0000035949868,0.0000063315965,0.010638216],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984419,0.00019494497,0.00017662707,0.00022881496,0.0005395555,0.00041817527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993917,0.00013270677,0.000026945238,0.00024604012,0.000013436893,0.00018921675],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005451265,0.00009555134,0.00017167299,0.000039915452,0.00027406792,0.00013418365,0.0005553263,0.000047976842,0.0012960966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007579757,0.00007384745,0.000055046243,0.0011140635,0.00006956695,0.000103309925,0.000017806515,0.00015111288,0.000043844986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014665133,0.000021775262,0.011431806,0.0000045448664,0.00007026229,0.0000466582,0.8719792,0.00015455381,7.994584e-7,0.0039596325,0.06731084,0.04500529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007993031,0.000008732229,0.006602336,0.0000041288017,0.000083150735,2.615025e-7,0.04771642,0.000045272955,0.0000040327827,0.00021806368,0.9451028,0.00013486623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.973106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99316937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87779194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029421906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051690184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4397039188","doi":"10.21275/sr23625065717","title":"Women's Access to and Control over the 5 Forms of Capital in Machakos Town Sub-County, Kenya","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre; Global Affairs Canada; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Capital (architecture); Geography; Socioeconomics; Economic growth; Political science; Business; Economics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.05259580457452125,"score_gpt":0.43845251265743856,"score_spread":0.38585670808291733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4397039188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859225,0.00014113447,0.000009864524,0.010371773,0.00036052792,0.00016571826,0.000013111413,0.0000037787618,0.0030115475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99900943,0.00033163215,0.00001176537,0.00021757113,0.00021603148,0.000008293578,1.1594563e-7,0.0000032384223,0.00020190413],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956948,0.00010972228,0.00027523923,0.00014974375,0.0033387959,0.0004316655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760884,0.0005249028,0.0001066946,0.000080587975,0.0014534126,0.00022557616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010897243,0.00005556183,0.00012571877,0.00081775757,0.0003419763,0.0005574312,0.0015965998,0.000036251276,0.00005746611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027700183,0.000033918237,0.000025544201,0.0014633811,0.0026913588,0.0011860954,0.00044511026,0.00029798533,0.000005649267],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000771711,0.00026568078,0.32586765,0.0000307129,0.0001310204,0.0004376496,0.530292,0.00020849888,0.02308919,0.062257446,0.0046467613,0.052001696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002526818,0.0005518456,0.7741502,0.00027437205,0.0000074061954,0.000034007833,0.09622087,0.00075497024,0.002663741,0.06960248,0.052920394,0.00029287048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004908812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015005478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44828257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029364193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000649391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9916424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399082956","doi":"10.29173/mlj910","title":"The Politics of the 1960s: South Africa, Civil Rights, and the Rule of Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Rule of law; Political science; Law; Civil rights","score_opus":0.014930760063202998,"score_gpt":0.24665087743670888,"score_spread":0.2317201173735059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399082956","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13151133,0.0025545973,0.00007462766,0.00558227,0.001494697,0.00034110903,0.000020910105,0.000022977923,0.8583975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99824727,0.000017420194,0.00008624941,0.00020905778,0.0007792008,0.0000024029011,8.096135e-8,0.000008689314,0.0006496113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765646,0.0008299369,0.0003558615,0.00009706521,0.00070432527,0.00035631898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982133,0.0007726936,0.00037499733,0.00034123167,0.00019657743,0.00010118297],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023643312,0.00010439481,0.00020259558,0.000014267951,0.0033389097,0.00021428656,0.0009406097,0.000071998016,0.00003197136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031574472,0.00004359535,0.00014190895,0.00013510305,0.004340089,0.000104231294,0.00016656407,0.00037017665,0.000008760852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012719109,0.000013503826,0.00031723708,0.0000039794245,0.000027349246,5.492614e-7,0.09074008,0.0000025385114,0.000004610044,0.90836054,0.0003377741,0.00017911568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045526904,0.000023931087,0.0001832327,0.000028343118,0.000058359474,0.0000049276828,0.023765756,0.00001788812,0.0001364057,0.26247787,0.712778,0.00007000963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019126046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05280381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86673594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044886277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052554296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399412387","doi":"10.1007/978-981-19-6056-7_15","title":"Women Human Rights Defenders: A Case of Activism of Mothers of Children with Albinism in Tanzania","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Tanzania; Albinism; Human rights; Political science; Psychology; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Law; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.02151983921128866,"score_gpt":0.28542263052942507,"score_spread":0.26390279131813643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399412387","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10751901,0.00020457376,0.000005133451,0.000024196546,0.0000607131,0.0004844441,0.00007425021,0.0000385771,0.8915891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7854723,0.0000044362846,0.00017553515,0.0000061387414,0.00005350453,0.000008073978,0.0000029874536,0.000039624883,0.21423744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817705,0.00004758881,0.00052191445,0.00038263478,0.0005614785,0.00030933038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888736,0.00009367016,0.00042109014,0.00039008373,0.00009706762,0.0001106989],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038991627,0.0002756028,0.0007157424,0.00035335598,0.00007777803,0.000017721253,0.0003836918,0.00037265226,0.0013857057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011673905,0.00021507316,0.0001295574,0.00014945157,0.0011143718,0.00011116212,0.00008992144,0.00034020952,0.000016589638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031140444,0.000064264175,0.00013977468,0.00008723664,0.00039454878,0.00023348218,0.26203832,0.0000032928242,0.00002155472,0.73674285,0.00011335559,0.00013020872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037604687,0.0024688502,0.0002357603,0.0029344417,0.00090651814,0.00014705486,0.04690723,0.000011255674,0.0018993808,0.80608904,0.13177988,0.0028601408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022522435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014728157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67795324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021132122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001662908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400900206","doi":"10.1177/14624745241266478","title":"Penal-welfare systems in a (post)colonial world: The rise and disregard of alcohol and drug rehabilitation centers in South Africa","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Punishment & Society","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Rehabilitation; Welfare; Political science; Criminology; Political economy; Sociology; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.011837325739133672,"score_gpt":0.28376865795533274,"score_spread":0.2719313322161991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400900206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9600644,0.013267987,0.0000036500944,0.021259042,0.0004353698,0.0011411123,0.000052902302,0.00006006758,0.0037154697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990031,0.00010654956,0.0001632164,0.000030651627,0.00007250057,0.00010019717,0.000002245316,0.000011709067,0.00050983095],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822736,0.0003920125,0.000316719,0.00031707817,0.00042759028,0.00031926803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999232,0.0004051762,0.000076347584,0.00015733641,0.000050109607,0.00007900743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001779308,0.00012817771,0.00020934707,0.00007262626,0.0002177491,0.00021409252,0.00019134398,0.00007111596,0.00001552268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001615837,0.00009741162,0.00009516065,0.00068694074,0.0006387489,0.00023810107,0.00012721616,0.00025196632,0.0000024311178],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019967289,0.000047801397,0.027728535,0.00015251496,0.00002564725,0.0000034436443,0.96394885,0.000014343771,0.000020329726,0.006575135,0.0010431209,0.00042031184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010769175,0.0000971837,0.039444763,0.0004804739,0.00007687948,4.759031e-7,0.585598,0.0015122689,0.0000072411653,0.001031388,0.37034413,0.00033027044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035088076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026031747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37835082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029725058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008183457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53042907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401071066","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4909207","title":"Civil Asset Forfeiture's Part In Funding Police Budgets","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Asset (computer security); Business; Finance; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.024049657615773053,"score_gpt":0.3397189862088488,"score_spread":0.3156693285930758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401071066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14738713,0.13577233,0.00083508773,0.021983756,0.021427732,0.0017430476,0.00011175842,0.0007688596,0.6699703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720094,0.007880302,0.00008015928,0.00016165791,0.0051585613,0.000035388995,0.0000110098545,0.0000761481,0.01458736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917655,0.0005867464,0.00067482877,0.00064034614,0.0010664795,0.005266089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862814,0.00018272393,0.00036419756,0.00039841622,0.00013211148,0.00029442259],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078274,0.00041564403,0.0005448441,0.00051317713,0.00052210613,0.00074211846,0.0014265793,0.00073142775,0.00018290826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004033579,0.0004070807,0.00036977933,0.00063636573,0.00022289983,0.00020980177,0.00089005625,0.014013835,0.0002987148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053161413,0.00012990212,0.0025993162,0.00012596669,0.00051906286,0.00009153156,0.1591373,0.000240711,0.000016573462,0.82163876,0.006894575,0.008553116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020212668,0.000053236887,0.000042084845,0.0003093952,0.00008137575,0.000032105687,0.012974491,0.00002809368,0.000004381911,0.673247,0.31258896,0.0004367678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01116258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24055591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8246223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007411429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012450834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401177462","doi":"10.1163/24056901-10020017","title":"A Deficiency of Available Remedies in Cases of Labor Trafficking: Ontario’s First Civil Precedent","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Labor Rights Case Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.0294594359829718,"score_gpt":0.3032932549320054,"score_spread":0.2738338189490336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401177462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7815245,0.0031532603,0.0000066543466,0.001143592,0.0023384544,0.00028576833,0.00027058643,0.00009095576,0.21118626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99178284,0.00004627199,0.00036208637,0.000042289423,0.00016409048,0.00002316315,0.000009868508,0.00001191867,0.0075574624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813116,0.000079577185,0.0004965089,0.00031928095,0.00071376096,0.00025972037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874026,0.00052526896,0.00012114573,0.00018473895,0.00035221776,0.00007634826],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045939165,0.0001378572,0.00022887066,0.00020084967,0.00018100286,0.000094384246,0.00038458596,0.00010063043,0.0025487524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022168907,0.00011531939,0.00008559439,0.00049772655,0.00054571254,0.0004023429,0.00007310422,0.00017970426,0.00006391238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004626835,0.00023810599,0.0025620656,0.00007641926,0.000054893237,0.0035083177,0.13618821,0.00010301308,0.00005732037,0.8553236,0.0017694312,0.00007235558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002303645,0.00006733318,0.00012031227,0.00033134612,0.000026378852,0.00008330628,0.0010732013,0.00010299108,0.0016590549,0.0037057144,0.9924389,0.00016110968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39273426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95797336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9906694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045671687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034572036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401177553","doi":"10.1163/17087384-bja10096","title":"Constitutional Damages in South Africa: A Transformative Approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ernest Oppenheimer Memorial Trust","keywords":"Damages; Constructive; Adjudication; Transformative learning; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Justiciability; Constitutional court; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Human rights","score_opus":0.060804941012245164,"score_gpt":0.3481304359984687,"score_spread":0.28732549498622356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401177553","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029728841,0.12643741,0.004237785,0.006374541,0.0021707208,0.00046717672,0.00006629563,0.00013271319,0.8303845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996533,0.0003343317,0.001750485,0.00003389519,0.000499041,0.000011317044,4.1479404e-7,0.00000760257,0.0008299527],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977092,0.00031458985,0.00059081777,0.0001788492,0.0007894209,0.00041711284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886274,0.000440402,0.00015974285,0.00008084443,0.00031271443,0.00014358103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017294342,0.00017271264,0.0004546938,0.000261996,0.00032782333,0.00018334293,0.00037590825,0.00006671855,0.000035219673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006669998,0.00013062132,0.0001891997,0.001096077,0.002596997,0.0009189633,0.00005027491,0.000560729,0.000022831693],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036661924,0.000058083457,0.00037199087,0.00004060464,0.00024083452,0.00022962035,0.75828874,0.00007173408,0.0000066995976,0.23825346,0.0013135788,0.001087976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031840327,0.00012033592,0.00009765753,0.00019190698,0.00007466293,0.000019700832,0.33966327,0.000025421778,0.000014673851,0.002672223,0.65661573,0.00018601782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000057174428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000050365157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96680415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038479484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005175369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9568744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401655519","doi":"10.1515/9782763754376-021","title":"UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES: BILL 101 AND THE ENGLISH-SPEAKING BLACK COMMUNITY","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unintended consequences; Political science; History; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.05589281031623833,"score_gpt":0.2979732299066317,"score_spread":0.2420804195903934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401655519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000030186293,0.001620349,0.000018725763,0.0042284923,0.0005990247,0.0004086449,0.00002242898,0.00018176988,0.99289036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30964515,0.00080184353,0.00023830133,0.00092516525,0.00046696127,0.0000060060097,0.00001257204,0.000031435025,0.6878726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744093,0.00091242,0.00036703612,0.00031107807,0.0006018417,0.00036668102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966663,0.0015862957,0.00024124436,0.0007327979,0.00061178993,0.00016154077],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021909045,0.00030459743,0.0005362734,0.00006499788,0.0012841071,0.00041597956,0.0009265697,0.00045972248,0.0033989896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001921266,0.00017759223,0.00017890439,0.000092620765,0.019782083,0.00015411705,0.00053138577,0.0015332972,0.000100774996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000104212795,0.0000047063777,0.000004514728,0.000010811854,0.00005621207,0.000015258307,0.26492134,3.061815e-7,3.9905478e-7,0.73372835,0.0008651823,0.00038250702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003192286,0.000013429963,9.4780046e-7,0.00013014983,0.00007098463,0.0000012690839,0.03988493,0.0000036089873,0.0000053111185,0.112371884,0.84694,0.00025825188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02073684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01563893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8460748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015444105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039565834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99751204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401764731","doi":"10.53555/sfs.v10i2.2961","title":"Mapping The Role Of Uniform Civil Code To Achieve The Goal Of Gender Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Code (set theory); Computer science; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Programming language","score_opus":0.2210486129728544,"score_gpt":0.336113366063578,"score_spread":0.11506475309072359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401764731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95356303,0.00048401294,0.000058983416,0.0030335488,0.0008326353,0.0001623587,0.000035492663,0.0000074062973,0.041822534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99921817,0.00012337082,0.00033293467,0.000058206853,0.00009880315,0.0000015643512,2.2338928e-7,0.000004195173,0.00016255994],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969547,0.0007678736,0.0006634298,0.00011060665,0.0012008665,0.00030256112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99650013,0.002199338,0.00064662646,0.00016345775,0.00042379528,0.000066624736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0155337555,0.00008287122,0.0002779993,0.00019646932,0.00035967748,0.00006700647,0.0015729534,0.00005426713,0.000059915776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037032007,0.000045973487,0.00008380412,0.0033912573,0.0022096336,0.00033546318,0.00017832576,0.00020695086,0.000003033763],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007939176,0.00003683344,0.5893556,0.000027988339,0.000027384947,0.0000029689454,0.40176585,0.0014908646,0.0006039382,0.0036494522,0.0015974885,0.0013622622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017852303,0.00034973168,0.55736786,0.00010632252,0.000025955282,0.0000027782496,0.39218697,0.00011829758,0.00064497493,0.008006143,0.04086474,0.00014772436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035436768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009964472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045655113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044573557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049412716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8141487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401904676","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4920291","title":"Billing Without Bilking: Regulating Time-Based Legal Fees Billing Without Bilking: Regulating Time-Based Legal Fees","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.01341578412402166,"score_gpt":0.29053444142036283,"score_spread":0.27711865729634116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401904676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87004864,0.021160258,0.04947934,0.013655284,0.0039008418,0.0021946644,0.00003459975,0.0037827184,0.035743665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767576,0.000096438016,0.0071109105,0.00023569215,0.0043790373,0.000031820728,0.00002340827,0.000306814,0.011058285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98697734,0.0012541898,0.0016207393,0.0014069922,0.0025832837,0.0061574304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99611384,0.0010712764,0.0009111354,0.00074390485,0.000546334,0.00061349],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011471054,0.00094625144,0.0010807685,0.0010592809,0.004021231,0.0030471466,0.0015398805,0.0005925665,0.00034824447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016902661,0.0008343501,0.0007583992,0.002546194,0.00092096714,0.0018209856,0.00016815268,0.004960834,0.0003315988],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023765655,0.0013527271,0.07257485,0.000982717,0.004026088,0.0007498522,0.09279412,0.16512384,0.08998517,0.4221817,0.0017238164,0.14612857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006309516,0.0020240452,0.00024429685,0.006288325,0.001452838,0.00052090624,0.017188052,0.56504756,0.011829081,0.061743014,0.32118607,0.006166286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023429731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014903423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39992374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042315256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0134568205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402054989","doi":"10.1080/00083968.2024.2354912","title":"Multi-layered encounters between Reclaim the City and the Cape Town municipality","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cape; Geography; Archaeology; Environmental planning","score_opus":0.08024490972404218,"score_gpt":0.3151783108301456,"score_spread":0.2349334011061034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402054989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8227464,0.10680153,0.000065708875,0.051900078,0.0031603703,0.00092383265,0.00023901054,0.00007424545,0.01408881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947119,0.0014437932,0.00049650075,0.0002690117,0.0012835911,0.000032638403,0.0000011496961,0.00003880056,0.0017226096],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99627745,0.000854509,0.00086902105,0.00041662483,0.00031808528,0.001264305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99362576,0.0033094198,0.00037866825,0.00051014114,0.00088618184,0.0012898472],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053771557,0.00038163833,0.00086154847,0.0003675135,0.002657837,0.00055898353,0.0014798129,0.00014246046,0.000048188118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067454167,0.00023118987,0.00032966313,0.0015787729,0.007198253,0.0004176598,0.00014058081,0.0007810558,0.000004531724],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004052943,0.000010208995,0.0072939233,0.00010721112,0.0011985281,0.00046030874,0.9433161,0.000029469717,0.000006575209,0.04119298,0.0021982822,0.004145897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049874734,0.00011505887,0.0021928905,0.0003777562,0.00044063455,0.00006630774,0.32398194,0.00007458622,0.0000019427835,0.004943616,0.66694295,0.00036357876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23379712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8897016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6647447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018729963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014901552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402335981","doi":"10.1177/00943061241269350v","title":"Fractured Militancy: Precarious Resistance in South Africa after Racial Inclusion","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Resistance (ecology); Inclusion (mineral); Political science; Gender studies; Development economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.042289714176997305,"score_gpt":0.344434641964908,"score_spread":0.3021449277879107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402335981","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034205152,0.9808005,0.00018907705,0.0027358234,0.0016848922,0.00050347584,0.000010865936,0.00003484916,0.010619974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990805,0.0043255906,0.0011010102,0.0004813975,0.00095665414,0.000032808042,0.0000018423646,0.000020660045,0.0022750408],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99548054,0.0022160606,0.0012034463,0.00030716657,0.00040106996,0.00039170016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835825,0.00054363284,0.00053238124,0.0002384743,0.00015034062,0.00017694329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004788481,0.00022419263,0.0008754265,0.00023729856,0.00032890943,0.000049700826,0.00061523187,0.00041536085,0.00022073682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017354531,0.0001715706,0.0004106447,0.00044431572,0.0007898905,0.0005543978,0.00021025294,0.0010518767,0.00009113806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018862626,0.00003145099,0.001791059,0.00008165027,0.000031803876,0.00046753485,0.98637503,2.5840833e-7,0.000016915774,0.0009416636,0.008151516,0.0019224626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002863304,0.0000720265,0.00040863798,0.0007598924,0.000028185572,2.3845698e-7,0.00028916035,0.0000012785773,0.0000021451635,0.0092556765,0.9887297,0.00016668886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019757366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019558598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9873845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033004387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009672715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6996446},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4402729297","doi":"10.1016/j.exis.2024.101542","title":"Sand mining governance in post-apartheid South Africa: Interlegalities of resource extraction on the Wild Coast","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Extractive Industries and Society","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Corporate governance; Resource (disambiguation); Extraction (chemistry); Sand mining; Political science; Fishery; Geography; Business; Biology; Finance","score_opus":0.03902330021030556,"score_gpt":0.2945714815110332,"score_spread":0.25554818130072765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402729297","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88567436,0.0044959653,0.000032715692,0.013632159,0.00041136754,0.00042491002,0.00013671725,0.00007243693,0.095119394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938937,0.00017081868,0.000022531916,0.00018108406,0.00032009033,0.000022365559,0.000001441279,0.000014422241,0.005373563],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984514,0.00033900302,0.00023887579,0.0002398103,0.00042890426,0.0003019929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974238,0.0021167342,0.00015089853,0.00019025306,0.000071827315,0.000046441208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014882002,0.00014916569,0.00017880397,0.000018448509,0.00057851645,0.00022079029,0.00026933718,0.00018952583,0.00010370039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057326804,0.00009063433,0.00010270409,0.0004557409,0.0012790605,0.0003390954,0.00007640634,0.0008263613,0.0000049131727],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059268903,0.000032189735,0.00042034357,0.000011142999,0.00006551492,0.00000379473,0.9444055,0.000013918886,0.000091908674,0.03839985,0.011091616,0.0054049836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010093671,0.00006578427,0.0015843707,0.00018843073,0.00002551058,0.0000011101525,0.62267375,0.00006698922,0.00038423165,0.0005634568,0.37422466,0.0001207762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011694763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020173923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36313304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013856003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018715386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47127515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402747029","doi":"10.1080/00083968.2024.2374572","title":"People and municipalities: decentralisation and the articulation of agency in local political arenas in Africa","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Decentralization; Articulation (sociology); Politics; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.0435911658284073,"score_gpt":0.2872933302576541,"score_spread":0.24370216442924678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402747029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95246804,0.036540084,0.00003458463,0.006354966,0.00037839537,0.0002867168,0.000024593286,0.000008811365,0.0039038148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986313,0.00081072474,0.00019668476,0.000037303296,0.000150773,0.000016494576,7.0356424e-7,0.00001688696,0.00013914758],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975037,0.00045531438,0.0007551889,0.00022999427,0.00017513888,0.00088068173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997211,0.0014724252,0.00017222812,0.00015277806,0.00033934662,0.0006522286],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021573643,0.00018699521,0.0005838216,0.000659541,0.0002736153,0.00010844504,0.00026950287,0.00009012451,0.00001570993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037616077,0.00014651586,0.00008768708,0.0013960043,0.0028776466,0.00032182515,0.00004401291,0.0002770766,4.944053e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026713635,0.000008459149,0.007867343,0.00013394438,0.000068252506,0.00015297861,0.6552873,0.00010022716,0.000003301151,0.33519644,0.000040316776,0.0011146953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009738489,0.00019195036,0.026182937,0.0011192161,0.00017854078,0.00007456304,0.87348545,0.0010147765,0.000004603821,0.06187055,0.034538742,0.0003648235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18687399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9317178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7448438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013322463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000774518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403372054","doi":"10.1080/02697459.2024.2409462","title":"Rights and planning: challenges, progress, and approaches","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Practice and Research","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental planning; Political science; Engineering ethics; Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Environmental science","score_opus":0.3409412562101764,"score_gpt":0.49613189840231714,"score_spread":0.15519064219214074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403372054","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057560757,0.62163454,0.000009797549,0.027100774,0.00025639735,0.0004439645,0.000003991505,0.00018759932,0.29280218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925368,0.0032248779,0.0010499395,0.000022614011,0.00058903557,0.000034039567,0.000002033879,0.000013937448,0.0025267387],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976317,0.0006501518,0.00011567799,0.0004394196,0.0006848438,0.00047818458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967634,0.0027677051,0.000027230057,0.000120803896,0.00008941225,0.0002314626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044229086,0.00010276396,0.00012783185,0.00018107296,0.0010656031,0.00091806415,0.00013733612,0.00015393087,0.000010674259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001313831,0.000080566206,0.000011475539,0.00026497134,0.0011409455,0.00081639114,0.00019688843,0.00076133315,0.00001844838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011234557,0.00006861253,0.0026259045,0.0004244658,0.000107237436,0.000873569,0.8508794,0.0000012272554,0.000005398143,0.09239266,0.006202334,0.046306893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093201634,0.0000820365,0.00053950725,0.00023664125,0.000020872461,0.0000263068,0.04575092,0.00020426002,0.0000070727297,0.0035417706,0.9493773,0.00012012333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004304786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017351693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94317496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002750529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010702444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8852914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403732074","doi":"10.54195/eirj.15838","title":"Exceptions to the binding force of a debtor’s arbitration agreement on the Insolvency Practitioner","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Insolvency and Restructuring Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Insolvency; Arbitration; Business; Bankruptcy; Agreement; Law; Creditor; Political science; Finance; Debt; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03859897225367584,"score_gpt":0.30528454188136284,"score_spread":0.26668556962768697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403732074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9238723,0.00011354777,0.0003281116,0.009463287,0.001095441,0.00030117293,0.000007869059,0.000050560466,0.06476774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966583,0.00028974158,0.0002966308,0.00029989582,0.0009253948,0.0000050042186,0.0000012814298,0.000013884366,0.0015098144],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981239,0.0006611965,0.00030095066,0.00014774798,0.0004994056,0.0002668209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991809,0.00021698892,0.00021223238,0.0001977573,0.000078901554,0.00011318119],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017779875,0.000098680735,0.000087824876,0.00014092984,0.002197792,0.00021226885,0.00038357143,0.000029425915,0.000120092736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007271374,0.000056506764,0.000066790366,0.0004885565,0.00018737391,0.0001992073,0.000092875045,0.00042053944,0.00013011672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001529992,0.00013370739,0.006559016,0.000060016006,0.0002110877,0.00019805822,0.7592811,0.0062026763,0.00954895,0.16276312,0.032988533,0.021900754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005893545,0.0004613893,0.1303562,0.000623989,0.00007719099,0.00005638171,0.026582517,0.000117980126,0.00082174694,0.010544643,0.8292968,0.00047177673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000043040007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004459168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7963083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058330214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006864667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403761697","doi":"10.61955/efslli","title":"Will clear rules fix statutory interpretation? Canadian experience with Judge Kavanaugh’s proposed “rules of the road”","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of legislative drafting and law reform.","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.011160227634690944,"score_gpt":0.3005250053962475,"score_spread":0.28936477776155656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403761697","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5928007,0.0019312912,0.00024155647,0.008501819,0.0021193183,0.00029553956,0.000110813744,0.000036790294,0.3939622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977361,0.000042223368,0.0007478424,0.0002191051,0.00039063432,0.0000030409535,0.0000018493644,0.000012271287,0.00084690965],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837404,0.00015125959,0.00038177523,0.00014220359,0.0007498444,0.00020087276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874085,0.00013207251,0.00028507962,0.000089134846,0.00061771146,0.00013514732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005709409,0.00011209263,0.00015948598,0.00013859813,0.00026135074,0.00022934319,0.00049909996,0.00005838558,0.00004862005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022628083,0.0000664031,0.000086761895,0.00012581405,0.0008540799,0.0014869039,0.000053001393,0.0003100322,0.0000040838104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101242564,0.000019875455,0.0022572947,0.000012348999,0.00018990778,0.00006567963,0.7074019,0.000022948068,0.000062993466,0.28135833,0.000035481415,0.008472051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044239117,0.00024964602,0.0052649337,0.0013826387,0.000052895037,0.000050701976,0.0212953,0.0005618208,0.00037483856,0.0042836866,0.96577704,0.00026407916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.099850535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045796223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9657416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004713334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006051349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9716155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404042131","doi":"10.7202/1114025ar","title":"Le statut juridique de l’<i>Accord d’Arusha pour la paix et la réconciliation au Burundi</i> à la lumière de l’arrêt de la Division d’appel de la Cour de justice de la Communauté des États de l’Afrique de l’Est dans l’affaire <i>The East African Civil Society Organizations’ Forum vs The Attorney General of Burundi and Two Others</i>","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Conciliation; Philosophy; Law; Arbitration","score_opus":0.009402461292829284,"score_gpt":0.2864156319494153,"score_spread":0.277013170656586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404042131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8303582,0.0007176966,0.06778528,0.020730024,0.00023088155,0.0005690219,0.00081792154,0.0002862737,0.0785047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983159,0.0018532611,0.009043357,0.0019842684,0.0007062194,0.00016246861,0.00009440632,0.00017946067,0.0028175283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98958546,0.0069307853,0.00072448974,0.0005863666,0.0006828214,0.0014900884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897134,0.0081542535,0.00060737826,0.0005188085,0.00044971463,0.0005564774],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010979038,0.0005290828,0.000492386,0.00015290643,0.0014054023,0.00071789714,0.0016806623,0.0008204708,0.000050517425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038150244,0.0005324988,0.00033877295,0.0010643429,0.0026978755,0.00050971116,0.00037864223,0.0014823476,0.000013875046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095308125,0.00044526625,0.16113451,0.0002512992,0.00031543648,0.00014186965,0.30425876,0.013469042,0.0052471412,0.50973624,0.0039918004,0.00091332605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032076892,0.00019456341,0.12831178,0.0016905942,0.00091446954,0.0013463341,0.11220264,0.09255463,0.001581372,0.12042471,0.53604805,0.0015231498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.074408576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06524132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5320563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004005845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0154871335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404585783","doi":"10.21991/cf29482","title":"The Prudent Parliament and Section 24(1)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Section (typography); Political science; Computer science; Law; Operating system; Politics","score_opus":0.018328256684608444,"score_gpt":0.2984950539539075,"score_spread":0.28016679726929905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404585783","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006936901,0.071654774,0.08753923,0.107150994,0.04300187,0.0025501295,0.00030214965,0.0017876441,0.6790763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99300927,0.00091005216,0.0003568551,0.0004800307,0.000787958,0.00014357384,0.000018012617,0.000009744735,0.004284492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744654,0.00014161285,0.00040673354,0.0004929194,0.0007566362,0.0007555513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987136,0.00048535105,0.000072341354,0.00026374208,0.00019053275,0.00027440378],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090158754,0.00023549334,0.00017829442,0.00013366259,0.0049764393,0.00092869176,0.00033863925,0.00019397943,0.00016175846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005423336,0.00018225703,0.00014427242,0.00048029926,0.011262261,0.0007634381,0.00018235669,0.00038828657,0.0003325811],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017605173,0.000024436911,0.0021339043,0.000013450154,0.00006550142,0.000025003521,0.0016958839,0.00005122903,0.00003137325,0.9718542,0.020520562,0.0035668497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022505657,0.000026772383,0.000068222165,0.00011973938,0.000043021875,0.00005452199,0.00572632,0.000359456,0.000041203766,0.028297095,0.9647925,0.00024610676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041301447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001080784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98607236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053975184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001731011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99631894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404586346","doi":"10.21991/cf29480","title":"Not Merely Interpretative","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.02562652841561336,"score_gpt":0.32874291388411897,"score_spread":0.3031163854685056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404586346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010950874,0.0067403694,0.15609968,0.023875955,0.009580385,0.0008101392,0.0005225112,0.0013326673,0.7999432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99089175,0.000103200626,0.0017946842,0.0017014636,0.0005332302,0.00011820093,0.00006076429,0.00001785693,0.004778822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652773,0.00019139623,0.0005719089,0.0007325625,0.00095600466,0.0010203749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820167,0.00059592223,0.000095076284,0.0003335731,0.000363019,0.0004107481],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007397699,0.00035611886,0.0003434975,0.00036316834,0.0021539764,0.0005467952,0.0006235348,0.00029876028,0.0015852741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012595573,0.00034734127,0.00034068193,0.0009014305,0.0141069945,0.001543763,0.00021486376,0.0005573965,0.003583884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038022274,0.00004589006,0.0009052256,0.000022406199,0.00012335787,0.000111785266,0.006171074,0.00009286541,0.00008157365,0.9748099,0.015367935,0.0022299786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030658176,0.00003581536,0.000029277175,0.0002896547,0.00006930851,0.000045733075,0.005905473,0.0007045135,0.00024337649,0.038121935,0.9537756,0.0004727592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046160846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004125892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9897967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070781447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003777802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404741362","doi":"10.13162/hro-ors.v11i3.5740","title":"Equality, Self-determination, Administrative Discretion: Lessons from the Implementation of Jordan Principles in Two Provinces","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Reform Observer - Observatoire des Réformes de Santé","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Administrative discretion; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.11441554133027304,"score_gpt":0.4723979715718027,"score_spread":0.35798243024152965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404741362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9759139,0.0053162687,0.00041312812,0.011299162,0.00043876359,0.0014466395,0.00045696791,0.00029476237,0.004420407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99245363,0.0010580558,0.005092264,0.00045710264,0.00030622628,0.00017840537,0.000111612746,0.00003381645,0.00030890226],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958529,0.00085264567,0.001113438,0.00049372576,0.0008409096,0.0008463901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981814,0.00054579513,0.0004359354,0.0004210463,0.00019010871,0.00022571477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003038671,0.00028243446,0.00043014748,0.00008965179,0.0008750981,0.00028339497,0.0007509701,0.00012035072,0.00015310415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013785245,0.0002024547,0.00015758524,0.0010448701,0.00059091224,0.0014439949,0.00014907798,0.00038084434,0.000013534323],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042584677,0.000129407,0.28546995,0.00068668986,0.000070802664,0.00001824437,0.5167781,0.000006814559,0.000009205454,0.11169279,0.000084634,0.085010774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007649224,0.00030748008,0.6946123,0.0010163808,0.000057211884,0.0000036195422,0.1633818,0.0013236079,0.00039618497,0.021804273,0.11582314,0.00050903705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10888839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42174232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4091424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003121052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033087225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8970456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404972541","doi":"10.1080/07053436.2024.2423302","title":"De l’émergence des programmes <i>Car Wash</i> à la production d’un espace collectif dans la ville de Port-au-Prince","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Loisir et Société / Society and Leisure","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"ESPACE; Port (circuit theory); Humanities; Art; Engineering","score_opus":0.01512876552614055,"score_gpt":0.31561995786081715,"score_spread":0.3004911923346766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404972541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8751963,0.060636595,0.0014797732,0.013575832,0.002282336,0.00080222223,0.00006469094,0.0005835494,0.0453787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92980975,0.015964178,0.0060131177,0.00030029946,0.001365738,0.0001379063,0.000009864787,0.00008933535,0.046309784],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954179,0.0012563848,0.00041078537,0.00096377346,0.0006721468,0.0012789918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981093,0.00076889497,0.00016328422,0.0003454569,0.00017451678,0.00043857892],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036977322,0.0004919662,0.00048569,0.000033898777,0.0018524125,0.000771798,0.00046252573,0.0009832138,0.00020810321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037046245,0.00050943927,0.0005559016,0.0019546638,0.0038546075,0.00082917186,0.00022535335,0.0013117476,0.000039206552],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025441674,0.00028470976,0.017306855,0.0008739121,0.0004200198,0.000080482874,0.86970055,0.00026794008,0.0008540993,0.07337335,0.008392732,0.02841991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024663526,0.000091069145,0.0016995186,0.00038198847,0.00027376754,0.00006960343,0.19226997,0.0005190874,0.00062073884,0.0057313596,0.79754597,0.000550281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003707101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016194697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7891533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011081127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018437573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405565090","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5062166","title":"The Relationship in Mandatory Reporting: Perspectives of Ontario Telephone Screeners and Investigation Workers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.03285755207355996,"score_gpt":0.31953120325108475,"score_spread":0.2866736511775248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405565090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9514341,0.033618275,0.000042016727,0.0031690777,0.0005056033,0.00028457568,0.0000012803785,0.00003157668,0.0109135285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888449,0.0017160462,0.00021598606,0.0000075599114,0.00029465964,0.000012147055,0.0000019639313,0.000020036096,0.008886755],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668545,0.0004063748,0.00090989197,0.0003277284,0.0005625633,0.0011079767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979111,0.00032543257,0.0012954137,0.00022409511,0.00014434553,0.00009961081],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010851446,0.00016753818,0.0002617301,0.00020938832,0.000545048,0.0002275491,0.00036682017,0.00027335988,0.000009252304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029738022,0.00013545067,0.00012162334,0.0003458381,0.00074644986,0.00011665266,0.00024765605,0.006339524,0.00000351549],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034287554,0.000011765556,0.42809153,0.000017264392,0.0001266174,0.000007793235,0.31655726,0.000087779445,0.000003902019,0.2535953,0.00008469829,0.0013818173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013863594,0.00003863759,0.033584822,0.00028096364,0.00006261023,0.000014326337,0.16514976,0.000009053931,0.0000036403428,0.79667264,0.0038720965,0.000172801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07106396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6536155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5825515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069983574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024960812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405643556","doi":"10.4000/12z72","title":"Resignations in the heat of the moment: A comparison of South African law with selected common-law countries","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit comparé du travail et de la sécurité sociale","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Moment (physics); Political science; Physics; Classical mechanics","score_opus":0.012927835118672761,"score_gpt":0.29514441896704474,"score_spread":0.282216583848372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405643556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.724542,0.0047495416,0.00033484626,0.005303949,0.00018731836,0.0012388122,0.00026194402,0.00018713395,0.2631944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99901694,0.0000534491,0.00016182006,0.00024368794,0.00014857248,0.000069698246,0.00000854119,0.000027079872,0.00027023742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965219,0.0016646923,0.000489307,0.0002462031,0.0006414186,0.00043650615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976511,0.0015776457,0.00016713573,0.00032803012,0.00020365728,0.00007244473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021226509,0.00017276708,0.0004900921,0.00007400535,0.0004514737,0.0002193515,0.0008572446,0.00017526286,0.00004391943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010745973,0.0001362699,0.00012422312,0.0015656557,0.0024964162,0.0001537593,0.00005374517,0.0005946031,0.000005459289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024626157,0.0001457774,0.012379833,0.00008356777,0.00004229316,0.000006599222,0.36015806,0.00018743388,0.000038236536,0.6264526,0.00045630746,0.000024667943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019188182,0.00036388662,0.035706982,0.0016631889,0.00057620485,0.000026797568,0.112122275,0.0030259707,0.0013991878,0.05663351,0.7856035,0.00095965824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010586072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031525627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7851472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027581683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075830874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407290833","doi":"10.1515/jtl-2025-0003","title":"The (Un)intended Consequences of Legal Transplants: A Comparative Study of Standing in Collective Litigation in Five Jurisdictions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Tort Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Criminal Justice Association","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Business; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.03760755494931052,"score_gpt":0.3622623859285788,"score_spread":0.3246548309792683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407290833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96830815,0.0009150964,0.00003892671,0.00050415104,0.0004677617,0.00030662908,0.00002057342,0.0000057871025,0.029432947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99961275,0.00005158852,0.00007671784,0.0000058000483,0.0000582602,0.0000061782443,2.0005525e-7,0.0000031335023,0.00018534616],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982963,0.0004409445,0.0005810988,0.000084668965,0.00046418965,0.00013276916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998739,0.00067928963,0.00025426468,0.000053362583,0.00023415919,0.00003993277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013001149,0.00006437749,0.0002675141,0.00016048072,0.0001713744,0.0000705067,0.00019532627,0.000042586296,0.000019212177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011697671,0.000045846893,0.000064979984,0.0006916183,0.00059598836,0.0004552516,0.000010418976,0.0002778573,4.741105e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021091428,0.00023919078,0.004595971,0.000013302774,0.00013564837,0.00008999552,0.9006282,0.0002204741,0.00031905976,0.09342417,0.00006345685,0.000059598446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001842719,0.0017935083,0.010141685,0.0010836902,0.00016035259,0.000018623083,0.9480767,0.00025829903,0.0034830743,0.022845773,0.010094992,0.00020057055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048285243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024919897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070578404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034170403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052892976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9928728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407799883","doi":"10.1163/17087384-bja10106","title":"Re-Appraisal of Legal Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa: Questioning the Legal Pluralism Paradigm","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); International law; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Epistemology; Legal research; Sociology; Legal realism; Philosophy","score_opus":0.034635560253492084,"score_gpt":0.3495001852745393,"score_spread":0.31486462502104723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407799883","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.307794,0.3691774,0.00041084673,0.070670895,0.013807493,0.00145075,0.000056005505,0.00015980644,0.2364728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956427,0.0015899607,0.00014958171,0.00007931112,0.00074945454,0.000025969684,4.900204e-7,0.00001954535,0.0017429694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99508244,0.0012176557,0.0014827392,0.00029975132,0.0012042545,0.00071316486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99578995,0.0020118398,0.0010262791,0.00033228245,0.00068803784,0.00015158887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038614166,0.00031282924,0.0010341803,0.00042450443,0.00076280104,0.00031800536,0.0011202709,0.00013450632,0.000010326097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037348813,0.0002219421,0.0003044281,0.0017820892,0.0016508977,0.0009901541,0.0002096095,0.0008855589,0.000007230419],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058699877,0.00039714246,0.011720689,0.00018240858,0.0016276131,0.0006713869,0.2702264,0.0018503304,0.0002634538,0.6316242,0.07845601,0.0023934052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076998555,0.00022009264,0.002056427,0.0007095923,0.0001833383,0.000014905974,0.081487894,0.000028837645,0.00010178787,0.0009658666,0.91318893,0.0002723553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070297797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028631594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8347329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050545315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007378546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408522727","doi":"10.47348/slr/2024/i2a2","title":"Learning from protected areas – Distilling lessons for a potential future OECM statutory framework in South Africa","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Political science; Environmental planning; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.03733155270315756,"score_gpt":0.33720983957268114,"score_spread":0.29987828686952356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408522727","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000864648,0.94566697,0.011075486,0.00822947,0.0027876135,0.0042314962,0.00024271995,0.0008273261,0.026074244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588637,0.027246712,0.008296404,0.0003143891,0.0025215477,0.00060337887,0.000068618756,0.000095366355,0.0019899206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966567,0.0007178246,0.0005458321,0.00072498946,0.00062100636,0.0007336063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985401,0.0005928887,0.00014999091,0.00037274015,0.0001289221,0.00021537203],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013055233,0.0002989592,0.00061108003,0.00007361406,0.00060805614,0.00032079272,0.0005098995,0.0003247414,0.0005472171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00096903235,0.0002671109,0.0003030669,0.0009017878,0.00026792302,0.00027085724,0.00011675153,0.0011065187,0.00020534685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090012436,0.00013985764,0.00015953879,0.007028273,0.0002326103,0.00019331551,0.3601325,0.00010736668,0.000034926372,0.57642883,0.0025708904,0.052881908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012335426,0.000038406743,0.000013953438,0.00758023,0.00013800577,3.1175742e-7,0.003232427,0.0001432859,0.0000034736072,0.0053553116,0.9830336,0.0003376556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005431875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016300776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9804627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020572054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003337084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409172553","doi":"10.52783/jier.v5i2.2465","title":"Inclusive Justice and Sustainable Legal Protections Against Domestic Violence: A Comparative Study of UK, Canada, and Australia","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Informatics Education and Research","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Domestic violence; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Law; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Environmental health; Medicine","score_opus":0.04049455776163485,"score_gpt":0.4634632471167358,"score_spread":0.42296868935510096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409172553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9873318,0.00040741355,0.000040232404,0.0007466309,0.00018573963,0.00053909386,0.0000017276648,0.0000016264939,0.01074571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99610513,0.00017791853,0.00029084692,0.000040718598,0.00005646138,0.00001174221,2.7920083e-7,0.0000013523908,0.0033155219],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851453,0.00024829365,0.0004161983,0.000047012385,0.00056180794,0.00021217973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746287,0.00036337646,0.0002163064,0.000069216694,0.0017360069,0.00015224627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020250713,0.00005711229,0.00016540351,0.0003611953,0.0008852297,0.00016451262,0.00013971237,0.000043701035,0.000008122377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011799623,0.000046106303,0.000009577808,0.0005937511,0.0003939717,0.00033673114,0.00012212318,0.00041238367,2.5076332e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008447037,0.0004578738,0.006971492,0.00076287217,0.000092687114,0.000008580653,0.9486457,0.00010043541,0.000013920304,0.029425142,0.010702808,0.0027340318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036663923,0.00022769396,0.0058931196,0.00017424866,0.00004341052,0.000006162202,0.9756686,0.000059771475,0.00002162682,0.00119966,0.01628615,0.000052923057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1668087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06621491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10059379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027145236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004570208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9508242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409675351","doi":"10.3138/cjwl-02-x","title":"Reasoning from Remedy in <i>R. v Morgentaler</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016044874679068545,"score_gpt":0.2740055504505927,"score_spread":0.25796067577152415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409675351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7534906,0.004815458,0.000017190805,0.02116924,0.00087593234,0.00015738203,0.000017901531,0.0000071602844,0.2194491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923238,0.000117236275,0.0001206795,0.002317864,0.00022263911,0.0000048222446,8.9910844e-7,0.000007801548,0.004884238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986943,0.00029831566,0.00030605658,0.00011917673,0.00013111954,0.0004510039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890804,0.00028416145,0.00014118178,0.00014900902,0.00006196819,0.0004556311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019436036,0.00009001476,0.00028992572,0.00013871085,0.00031593975,0.00017805646,0.00043736005,0.0000777844,0.0001397825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005397133,0.00007619307,0.00006416029,0.00034310966,0.000592622,0.00019866618,0.000027344175,0.0003535083,0.000006605928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000513432,0.000008274083,0.0142481495,0.000007296052,0.00005337112,0.00014814845,0.30617067,0.0000123156315,0.0000045195425,0.677469,0.0008325418,0.0009943513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019316438,0.00003064876,0.003097187,0.00033744922,0.000030775478,0.000010291009,0.042920202,0.000026988428,0.000017402157,0.24950732,0.70190835,0.00018173493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14106317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43714306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7010758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006933021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084565964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86465657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410002467","doi":"10.21991/cf29491","title":"“We do not really know why this approach was taken”: Explaining and Modifying the Supreme Court’s Approach to the Indirect Horizontal Effect of Charter Rights","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02154921779442441,"score_gpt":0.27536276577393937,"score_spread":0.25381354797951494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410002467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012636288,0.005737988,0.09705743,0.02205538,0.0031750356,0.004254412,0.00042444727,0.0003297578,0.8543293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99574596,0.00008620627,0.0016168599,0.0009113005,0.0002883056,0.0004335831,0.00004819727,0.000012396295,0.0008571853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957248,0.00065698934,0.0007063603,0.0008123417,0.0010860242,0.0010135025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99738884,0.0011163887,0.0002595001,0.0006585152,0.00031557473,0.0002612063],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025267024,0.0004802375,0.00064340886,0.00032338614,0.005288718,0.00037258543,0.0011391096,0.00034020064,0.0000544439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010128639,0.0003045017,0.00028341953,0.0010521823,0.009326165,0.0006499644,0.00047441624,0.00065011345,0.000047652687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018009101,0.00009355667,0.0028583608,0.000057773825,0.00018574807,0.000004097651,0.013426979,0.00040080058,0.00006438892,0.9699589,0.011502453,0.0012668194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019903912,0.00018308988,0.00013813647,0.00051438005,0.0003173057,0.00006144568,0.014450372,0.0021877442,0.00080308266,0.0063011497,0.9723173,0.0007356435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086945825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036435187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98310965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035018503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011441142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410307168","doi":"10.1177/00219096251339092","title":"Legal Pluralism and Child Identity: The Interplay of Igbo Worldview and English Traditions in <i>Chinweze &amp; Anor v Masi &amp; Anor</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Asian and African Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Igbo; Sociology; Identity (music); Gender studies; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.018939784391391046,"score_gpt":0.3373833903494517,"score_spread":0.31844360595806065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410307168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80177,0.07530741,0.000040069175,0.03144482,0.0009277894,0.0003434165,0.000048728507,0.000021147676,0.09009664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892164,0.008652251,0.00033831273,0.00026589743,0.00024214733,0.000003946773,4.0534397e-7,0.0000060048837,0.001274662],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985216,0.00028093703,0.00049898395,0.00015995647,0.00031288998,0.00022561141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989679,0.00032471033,0.0002979161,0.00011847778,0.00019416022,0.00009684362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009172298,0.00014730988,0.0004948717,0.00023578298,0.00048355456,0.00018051796,0.00023622814,0.000050055092,0.000011428322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005197677,0.000101079735,0.00008407677,0.0006265255,0.0012603624,0.0005385824,0.000105221436,0.00037158112,5.051474e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067440415,0.00012798494,0.017256435,0.00015006421,0.00041759896,0.000022501472,0.92305124,0.0000012874151,0.000021580034,0.043714974,0.009043605,0.0061252974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060721533,0.0000675321,0.02255018,0.0006796783,0.00016021305,0.000017235172,0.1966759,3.7895654e-7,0.000005306761,0.004724952,0.7743534,0.00015803475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022912226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070322724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76530975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057024434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000063655745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46438578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410444879","doi":"10.17159//1727-3781/2025/v28i0a20220","title":"The Judiciary's Contribution to Preventing Protected Area Downgrading, Downsizing, and Degazettement: Mining and Environmental Justice Community of South Africa v MEC for Agriculture, Rural Development Land and Environmental Affairs (1322/2021) [2024] ZAMPMBHC 48 (18 July 2024)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Environmental justice; Environmental planning; Economic Justice; Political science; Geography; Environmental protection; Law","score_opus":0.010362434990230969,"score_gpt":0.2489336477855339,"score_spread":0.23857121279530294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410444879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95226735,0.03534466,0.0028389683,0.0012717925,0.0006714333,0.0039192038,0.0001980595,0.00011291428,0.0033756082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942202,0.001514771,0.0017062399,0.000064572996,0.00028031936,0.00032525478,0.00006408432,0.00005577752,0.0017688068],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939858,0.0010687158,0.0012452503,0.0006706359,0.00094854797,0.0020810664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969546,0.00095513125,0.0009350529,0.00046701095,0.00013223238,0.0005559356],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036968032,0.0007196401,0.0008723829,0.00023513452,0.006301845,0.0006273737,0.0007429029,0.00036055595,0.000046496632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066517317,0.0005871628,0.0002054928,0.0005168308,0.0011302358,0.00055446726,0.00059507793,0.0016193831,0.0000037392106],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008361187,0.0034809469,0.058577295,0.0015903814,0.014299101,0.00009510748,0.68165225,0.00048410665,0.07538506,0.04389282,0.02037816,0.091803595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010740284,0.0021837738,0.0041497312,0.0014799867,0.0033937944,0.00014907354,0.28759193,0.0006328006,0.0106470315,0.010076924,0.6662941,0.002660549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042090693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002493371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6459159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016814492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043772135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410603649","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v18n3p1","title":"Procedural Exclusivity in Ghana: The Legacy of O&amp;#39;Reilly v. Mackman","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Ghana","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.020652261662847005,"score_gpt":0.3365854009939209,"score_spread":0.3159331393310739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410603649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8042178,0.0011618277,0.00003583141,0.013668413,0.00041097956,0.00010444512,0.0000053179997,0.0000045193683,0.18039086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99690056,0.000033182743,0.00025425688,0.000847008,0.00020288886,5.567326e-7,1.098532e-7,0.0000031306276,0.0017583313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901736,0.0001237571,0.0003191514,0.000058515394,0.0002665902,0.00021460738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992965,0.00018718731,0.00017307128,0.00009037729,0.00017652106,0.000076362405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007866173,0.00005934535,0.00018678173,0.00006701478,0.00019665544,0.00007828969,0.00024920655,0.00005676772,0.000023331462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038558803,0.000039831408,0.000059447753,0.00020759781,0.00053867674,0.00019287823,0.000063584455,0.00021557022,9.943487e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000079704405,0.000041741037,0.002064222,0.000025376377,0.000015719173,0.00000668767,0.028964125,0.0000024635483,0.000030401796,0.96806985,0.00060574117,0.00016570651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068966043,0.00008574366,0.006165274,0.00020427353,0.00006407558,0.0000104601895,0.022213442,0.0000174103,0.00026663372,0.11767562,0.8524667,0.0001407199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036983981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003782191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85186094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000073216346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028914318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5590896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411625495","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v18n3p20","title":"Reforming the Constitution in a Developing Country: How Mismanaging Constitutional Reforms Led to Electoral Loss in Botswana","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Development economics; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.015959542227229586,"score_gpt":0.31688058072883685,"score_spread":0.3009210385016073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411625495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65591824,0.0024403266,0.004014422,0.09843357,0.0017470662,0.000514309,0.00001562299,0.000022328291,0.23689412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974189,0.00003896562,0.00053023215,0.0016475741,0.00012993524,0.000001536065,4.1589323e-7,0.0000015745193,0.00023086688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999047,0.000071596434,0.00027373794,0.000076062766,0.00024517643,0.0002864172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995557,0.00009627743,0.00009925517,0.000055273034,0.00012182194,0.00007164263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001035229,0.000067858535,0.0001610982,0.00015546873,0.00033027172,0.00012501224,0.00016738713,0.000057612928,0.0000026758207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000317613,0.000046615485,0.000024972056,0.00039922952,0.00086157524,0.00025591985,0.00004199353,0.000231467,5.595237e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008465537,0.0000075461044,0.007830368,0.000009850878,0.000008407153,0.00003055551,0.005316239,0.000023611881,0.000013175502,0.9866011,0.000052279058,0.00009838136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079734233,0.000029249763,0.003162295,0.00062182196,0.000019581004,0.000023687955,0.007923768,0.00007864423,0.00013762552,0.06095502,0.92608625,0.00016474511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026483764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063679283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9260339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006743082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008680798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40035704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411694090","doi":"10.1080/01419870.2025.2520414","title":"Carceral apartheid: how lies and white supremacists run our prisons","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnic and Racial Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); Prison; Criminology; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.061986835306394275,"score_gpt":0.4144539717605644,"score_spread":0.35246713645417016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411694090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46466947,0.28141454,0.000104079976,0.09546737,0.003158949,0.0009791221,0.00003962841,0.00037980973,0.15378705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9567939,0.0064330753,0.0001565245,0.0002272975,0.0004016141,0.000022804625,6.784084e-7,0.000006023803,0.035958096],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888957,0.00016151105,0.00012956155,0.0002654144,0.0002205071,0.00033345452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995105,0.00014790641,0.000050933068,0.000106071006,0.000102078106,0.0000824839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004377542,0.00014253613,0.00029784863,0.00005615954,0.0011471754,0.00010032368,0.00012628704,0.000110492154,0.000006663788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063452567,0.00011689721,0.000044682016,0.00027496507,0.00073087827,0.0001557675,0.00024739892,0.00017961254,0.000005844204],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034110613,0.000025412462,0.032764923,0.000068331574,0.00019689839,0.000008911355,0.9106765,5.9609266e-7,0.00001565989,0.013885234,0.019954337,0.022369126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004699657,0.0000548742,0.03121458,0.000087718276,0.000110226705,5.7958476e-7,0.2528473,0.000005299386,0.000028536719,0.0059239813,0.7089472,0.00030974468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023261496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003931916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68899286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004680234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006649022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8823262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412154862","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-82411-1_11","title":"Reflections on the Future of Legal Segmentation: Three Frontiers of Investigation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Global dynamics of social policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Segmentation; Political science; Cartography; Computer science; Geography; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02158115838513291,"score_gpt":0.34491192270554116,"score_spread":0.32333076432040825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412154862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024391219,0.0003746373,0.00019970682,0.014270735,0.0010205891,0.00045004208,0.0017152972,0.000032218777,0.98169285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61365646,0.00092830614,0.0054576546,0.001991145,0.01165827,0.000054220094,0.0006467904,0.000103499864,0.36550367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982356,0.00009184257,0.0005013674,0.00021180915,0.0007433223,0.00021610012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846494,0.0000597936,0.00076837954,0.00023917279,0.00040593225,0.00006180663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028769937,0.00020922815,0.00042205158,0.00015124748,0.0003984018,0.000026505488,0.00055955816,0.0005208193,0.000039014074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016003691,0.0001963186,0.00029174206,0.0004419775,0.001642548,0.00010146786,0.00009699051,0.0002975969,0.0000041913318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033667977,0.000013574768,0.00006493189,0.000035820867,0.00012916206,3.0746457e-7,0.007350633,0.000007271058,0.000001806228,0.9761764,0.013134717,0.0030517536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021997817,0.00010173611,0.00038448197,0.0001053764,0.00019125587,1.4122084e-7,0.0060506286,0.00003152173,0.000008064934,0.8195419,0.17312163,0.00024328838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009647282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014402445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6161892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001084634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014292737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412372703","doi":"10.5430/jct.v14n3p149","title":"Interrogating the Disconnect: A Limpopo Province Case Study of Mainstream Educators’ Engagement with Inclusive Education Policies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Curriculum and Teaching","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Political science; Mainstreaming; Pedagogy; Sociology; Economic growth; Special education; Economics","score_opus":0.010436289053292927,"score_gpt":0.3549087171550855,"score_spread":0.34447242810179257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412372703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.986462,0.00044454818,0.00005913417,0.001445305,0.00034922923,0.00033379326,5.752438e-7,0.000007101856,0.010898328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990656,0.000007920536,0.00041034576,0.000076062024,0.00027602326,0.00000712657,1.06936035e-7,0.000004758959,0.00015205315],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984569,0.0006434711,0.00035284244,0.00009941657,0.0002965467,0.00015081646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889374,0.0002689062,0.00049997645,0.00011527563,0.00015642676,0.00006565363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001472583,0.000095190415,0.00018636245,0.00014446012,0.0010305145,0.00013139978,0.00023868315,0.000026172256,0.0000036701726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007124133,0.00005458108,0.000040508385,0.00017544937,0.00016006498,0.0003009424,0.00014439029,0.0004684727,1.2614541e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000089024015,0.0008922445,0.0742789,0.000026822101,0.00008343099,0.000049716247,0.8891835,0.0000136834715,0.000011335782,0.016126808,0.00014700522,0.01917765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027366882,0.0003081565,0.0008380407,0.00029815634,0.00011329724,0.000092236085,0.99399805,0.000014894907,0.0000126029,0.0002994566,0.0036859112,0.00006551596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013451197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007246369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10481456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014044886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070020935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99311835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412847133","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340118","title":"The Appointment of Commissioners of the Independent Electoral Commission in Botswana","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; International law; Law; Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.022845490107340896,"score_gpt":0.36870934968682767,"score_spread":0.3458638595794868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412847133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69288796,0.0693437,0.000078718986,0.06878159,0.003308663,0.000910945,0.000010243773,0.000020333015,0.16465783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99781233,0.0003652492,0.00009841672,0.00004033373,0.000055850684,0.0000029187029,3.0163143e-8,0.0000043128816,0.0016205593],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975253,0.00059983047,0.0007296545,0.00008805298,0.0008094187,0.00024774575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799955,0.00062470196,0.00068416673,0.00020462506,0.0004259744,0.00006097168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002052579,0.00010882534,0.0003980474,0.000107841224,0.00050675974,0.000027984855,0.00085030106,0.00004699691,0.000008440166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014635922,0.00005508068,0.00017689665,0.0008371522,0.0010721787,0.00011090622,0.00025235792,0.00037131476,4.3756896e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010702353,0.00092395255,0.29133943,0.00015917287,0.0016617015,0.000050790008,0.4516146,0.0003657346,0.0018989469,0.1753206,0.044962995,0.030631864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010577126,0.0003303812,0.030089984,0.0006375424,0.0001282202,0.0000020694315,0.16037288,0.0000077306,0.0027218577,0.006004417,0.7984932,0.00015396925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010319226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001098772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75353026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030558373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045279518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3950487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413254496","doi":"10.1080/23323256.2025.2469679","title":"Post-pandemic women-led vigilantism: implications for gender, power and popular justice in the rural Eastern Cape","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology Southern Africa","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Cape; Economic Justice; Power (physics); Pandemic; Political science; Criminology; Gender studies; Sociology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Socioeconomics; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.028697583394611807,"score_gpt":0.35488879723906824,"score_spread":0.32619121384445643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413254496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8891109,0.007118274,0.0023282669,0.042216282,0.0016055715,0.0018936669,0.00040775043,0.0002620551,0.055057216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99450505,0.00012925101,0.00019209774,0.0013599977,0.000109355635,0.000204837,0.00000963242,0.000017366412,0.003472416],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805033,0.00040812002,0.00030772662,0.00035031987,0.0001545283,0.000728947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987771,0.000518255,0.00010728141,0.00038253455,0.00012686074,0.00008798051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007999548,0.00018324681,0.00028093188,0.00014161118,0.0010480611,0.00008581964,0.00062948925,0.00025081757,0.00014743942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005558765,0.00014519096,0.000070736496,0.0004599325,0.0016212461,0.00010133486,0.00010704915,0.00024972923,0.00006862809],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082396,0.00014199209,0.0868187,0.00002872191,0.00007196054,0.000005771387,0.7925076,0.0000011854858,0.0002174473,0.11744675,0.0014767811,0.001200699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010019259,0.0001345604,0.006775255,0.000017425167,0.000149062,0.0000066541834,0.70703787,0.000022039867,0.0000027884807,0.03677681,0.24775922,0.00031637444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015390872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011708498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24628244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001230843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018258406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8060944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413295264","doi":"10.51363/unifr.diff.2025.50","title":"Contentious Status of the Banadir Regional Administration","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"IFF working paper online","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Università di Macerata","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Political science; Regional science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.08777951208073798,"score_gpt":0.38182387220633257,"score_spread":0.2940443601255946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413295264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027827641,0.011902619,0.000011011494,0.004967777,0.0075729163,0.0007407426,0.0003583743,0.00013227708,0.9715315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8215787,0.0022981754,0.0004040923,0.00042422165,0.0020703487,0.000018462631,0.00026951745,0.000026523165,0.17290996],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655825,0.00027067296,0.00062475656,0.0003767685,0.0016443742,0.0005251589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977564,0.00031542018,0.0006294916,0.00055661355,0.00060747575,0.00013460044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069819007,0.00022672258,0.00042594466,0.000095526615,0.00041254915,0.00007842374,0.0006794035,0.00047558825,0.00019973748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017376441,0.00018018314,0.000305848,0.00060445734,0.00056645076,0.000060368042,0.00012804217,0.0006258917,0.000005451454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033331822,0.0020219127,0.10990954,0.0011045514,0.0018414065,0.000215737,0.10584049,0.000051061746,0.00023112481,0.06291821,0.4650011,0.25053155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013465589,0.000018068837,0.003392182,0.0007147223,0.0001163259,0.000001432283,0.00084027083,0.0000017858335,0.0000036747833,0.00038198463,0.99422294,0.00017196879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011151574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052863125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8187959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066278054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007989543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99763423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413515758","doi":"10.64628/aam.yapqw77kt","title":"Wet'suwet'en: Why are Indigenous rights being defined by an energy corporation?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Corporation; Political science; Energy (signal processing); Business; Law; Physics; Ecology","score_opus":0.018042524420948666,"score_gpt":0.2679641409730237,"score_spread":0.249921616552075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413515758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15703812,0.00078759616,0.01672206,0.018331727,0.0012221517,0.0006514971,0.00006741678,0.0017721996,0.80340725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98870337,0.000010715933,0.001821516,0.004122457,0.0006373469,0.000014092223,0.000036420028,0.000017817092,0.004636265],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816513,0.00029738975,0.00024073248,0.0003704629,0.00052853883,0.00039773202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990309,0.00011153394,0.00013675602,0.00020028492,0.000113095346,0.00040747062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002257709,0.00015051995,0.00020201916,0.000037945756,0.00082973094,0.00024100122,0.0004950368,0.00016993935,0.0008253105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015014061,0.00013633916,0.000052902917,0.0005088348,0.00016713995,0.00058761856,0.000062387575,0.000136085,0.00019310757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028240745,0.0002070483,0.007405578,0.000010210082,0.000044205866,0.00006639394,0.6054693,0.000036962567,0.0004186325,0.31878856,0.06614961,0.0013752665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019100778,0.0001084201,0.0000666736,0.0000046003756,0.000015271953,3.015911e-7,0.0051762294,0.00013822342,0.0010283189,0.015264356,0.9777252,0.00028138125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017877715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012331557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9115756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000104217695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012776718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9886623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413525533","doi":"10.64628/aam.64pha3tx5","title":"Are We Dating The Same Guy? Online groups toe the line between protecting women and defaming men","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Line (geometry); Psychology; Computer security; Internet privacy; Computer science; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.08829303166513598,"score_gpt":0.35662887062926063,"score_spread":0.26833583896412466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413525533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94959384,0.00023380638,0.00012422662,0.025401479,0.0001417251,0.00079132506,0.00002236163,0.0004542933,0.023236927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99061,0.000038594717,0.0005178584,0.00030779312,0.0012893124,0.00006477487,0.0000037488085,0.000019083784,0.0071488516],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980795,0.0004153113,0.00024512218,0.00026184184,0.00044847548,0.00054975844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977742,0.0016110373,0.00018986614,0.00027135146,0.000058344765,0.000095231895],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031165997,0.00012425422,0.00017646016,0.00004171817,0.0020440568,0.00027142128,0.00055039657,0.00007757756,0.000095601805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002633161,0.00006849767,0.000033233577,0.0008613501,0.00031414602,0.00019784212,0.00043885192,0.00041848066,0.00004225141],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006190674,0.00001819049,0.053197574,0.00003530679,0.00006462316,0.000007816677,0.90427506,0.00003630171,0.00008261983,0.0026543743,0.0012304493,0.03839152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023263937,0.00004594841,0.017607922,0.00007822874,0.000024864288,5.980325e-7,0.81232184,0.0011870067,0.00006484689,0.007612956,0.16053489,0.00028826177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001531805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010487721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15930444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009816709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000406995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413602748","doi":"10.64628/aam.e7wrcrqj4","title":"Police violations of Charter rights highlight the need for accountability and transparency","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Charter; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.0758745830195794,"score_gpt":0.3763282472076923,"score_spread":0.3004536641881129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413602748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53456813,0.00085665623,0.010846061,0.05158346,0.0076887505,0.012118855,0.0027089792,0.0014201677,0.37820894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945796,0.000035112113,0.0006850536,0.000058943635,0.00040936668,0.00019347733,0.000020175043,0.000012823132,0.004005409],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856883,0.00014208807,0.00035703953,0.00034858158,0.0003244395,0.00025904315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839956,0.0007105998,0.00014481945,0.0004605521,0.00020817766,0.00007630891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007854127,0.00014981988,0.000278527,0.000060041348,0.00049627706,0.00009201899,0.0005451157,0.00027061472,0.0001976976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006920596,0.00009679002,0.00013653318,0.00019784222,0.00052099384,0.00010256376,0.00014014597,0.0002123399,0.000016485646],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002363966,0.00006717213,0.0048756585,0.00016686686,0.0000911978,9.510189e-8,0.87146515,0.000014035845,0.00003430781,0.11961306,0.003463943,0.00018489092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070265966,0.00008801262,0.029770983,0.00017050919,0.0004279273,1.5289352e-7,0.024831388,0.0005424015,0.00036809593,0.2727513,0.6694663,0.0008802473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10807978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060599416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84663373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005705362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014241603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9565422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414654018","doi":"10.38159/ehass.202561026","title":"Exploring Automatically Unfair Dismissals due to “Agreed” or “ Normal” Retirement Age in South Africa","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"E-Journal of Humanities Arts and Social Sciences","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Mandatory retirement; Labour law; Retirement age; Age discrimination; Scholarship; Legislation","score_opus":0.221081386833867,"score_gpt":0.35437968640747863,"score_spread":0.13329829957361164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414654018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6441279,0.0006735143,0.0001202597,0.007141446,0.0012544106,0.00034443405,0.00000556206,0.000052391526,0.34628007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99409354,0.00003545871,0.00090121164,0.00042530024,0.00042193028,0.000011696784,1.259302e-7,0.000005493479,0.0041052606],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976575,0.00018895703,0.0005676024,0.00019908999,0.0008707016,0.0005161674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992431,0.00022684914,0.00021137095,0.000067075605,0.00014277051,0.0001088689],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023999363,0.0001412966,0.00037327068,0.00032720086,0.001781861,0.00062861765,0.00058087456,0.000055549877,0.0002474552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004337298,0.000106763146,0.00008326053,0.00060191035,0.0012609023,0.0008210822,0.00015932304,0.00019660831,0.000008360616],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034387558,0.000047417154,0.00055572885,0.000023142717,0.0000150865935,0.00011607685,0.87597275,0.0000076015585,0.000011698617,0.1198449,0.0014522636,0.0019189615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042675735,0.00035715365,0.005996185,0.00032285906,0.000035635137,0.0000017363781,0.5191105,0.000011358911,0.000027212494,0.009269138,0.46412054,0.00032091825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026847396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024501877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46266827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016578684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036279028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414736529","doi":"10.36475/11.3.2","title":"The Global Implications of South Africa’s Transformative Constitutionalism on Private Law Systems","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and World","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Transformative learning; Private law; Argument (complex analysis); Mandate; Private sphere; Politics; Normative; Public law","score_opus":0.020269145321503604,"score_gpt":0.30819381834833914,"score_spread":0.28792467302683555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414736529","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00069689215,0.0010211433,0.00024358134,0.003964666,0.0002561852,0.00026074197,0.00011915334,0.0000339882,0.9934037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996962,0.000012590723,0.000037931455,0.0003639856,0.000040375762,0.000027290742,0.0000017729251,0.0000013534535,0.002552698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993342,0.00009278439,0.00016205512,0.000098292425,0.00015385375,0.0001587735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995154,0.00019779465,0.00005145915,0.0001327873,0.00005523016,0.000047289657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025859132,0.000059081616,0.00009940986,0.000013281245,0.0009147674,0.000087756845,0.00018359843,0.00003323858,0.000005173661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024276316,0.000040959785,0.0000337045,0.000329995,0.0013726008,0.00007643995,0.000021206683,0.00006757318,0.000008790489],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007682786,0.000010836229,0.00042713023,0.0000069856906,0.000017865279,1.4019702e-7,0.012283784,0.0000071677027,0.0000011361406,0.98688483,0.00029936834,0.000053045645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112890506,0.000006489125,0.00022437911,0.000037869788,0.000014925814,6.7279665e-8,0.0013341398,0.0000032272026,0.00001685772,0.099074736,0.8991302,0.000044224143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011664417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030759159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006267477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006448244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70357436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415256078","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5612191","title":"Arbitrary Detention Powers and Section 1 of the Charter: Two Critical Blind Spots in &lt;i&gt;Luamba&lt;/i&gt;","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Blind spot; Power (physics); Feature (linguistics)","score_opus":0.012514497836076057,"score_gpt":0.3101200581526644,"score_spread":0.29760556031658836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415256078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9085478,0.025429023,0.0013725306,0.0057415646,0.0064261933,0.0010590994,0.000037605485,0.00008119747,0.051304974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925188,0.003975233,0.00011615007,0.000075303695,0.00091558386,0.000017229459,0.0000035648666,0.000019882698,0.002358278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99524856,0.00094484887,0.0006551807,0.00046480726,0.0008561734,0.0018304093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987021,0.00022709461,0.00035957556,0.00034063298,0.0002335479,0.00013706349],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043676393,0.00028045292,0.00043295464,0.00035126397,0.00051889516,0.00017625354,0.0007633787,0.0004835119,0.00005676424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074580964,0.000244782,0.0003022635,0.00053488906,0.0006157938,0.000270749,0.00034382264,0.0046741026,0.000004896963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044723842,0.0004399799,0.0077166343,0.00021140074,0.0004469482,0.000022881395,0.043749955,0.0001604861,0.0020683722,0.9265248,0.0002729037,0.017938387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024207418,0.00027092325,0.008930622,0.0010343019,0.0004077869,0.00009233744,0.005294655,0.0003335637,0.00019558978,0.94686997,0.03334617,0.0008033342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041907936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011369662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083970964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017530979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005337218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415300917","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2025/v28i0a20220","title":"The Judiciary's Contribution to Preventing Protected Area Downgrading, Downsizing, and Degazettement: Mining and Environmental Justice Community of South Africa v MEC for Agriculture, Rural Development Land and Environmental Affairs (1322/2021) [2024] ZAMPMBHC 48 (18 July 2024)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Set-aside; Situated; Protected area; Convention on Biological Diversity; Environmental justice; Marine protected area; Rural area; Biodiversity; Convention","score_opus":0.010362434990230969,"score_gpt":0.2489336477855339,"score_spread":0.23857121279530294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415300917","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95226735,0.03534466,0.0028389683,0.0012717925,0.0006714333,0.0039192038,0.0001980595,0.00011291428,0.0033756082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942202,0.001514771,0.0017062399,0.000064572996,0.00028031936,0.00032525478,0.00006408432,0.00005577752,0.0017688068],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939858,0.0010687158,0.0012452503,0.0006706359,0.00094854797,0.0020810664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969546,0.00095513125,0.0009350529,0.00046701095,0.00013223238,0.0005559356],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036968032,0.0007196401,0.0008723829,0.00023513452,0.006301845,0.0006273737,0.0007429029,0.00036055595,0.000046496632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066517317,0.0005871628,0.0002054928,0.0005168308,0.0011302358,0.00055446726,0.00059507793,0.0016193831,0.0000037392106],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008361187,0.0034809469,0.058577295,0.0015903814,0.014299101,0.00009510748,0.68165225,0.00048410665,0.07538506,0.04389282,0.02037816,0.091803595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010740284,0.0021837738,0.0041497312,0.0014799867,0.0033937944,0.00014907354,0.28759193,0.0006328006,0.0106470315,0.010076924,0.6662941,0.002660549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042090693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002493371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6459159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016814492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043772135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415406449","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340124","title":"The Persistence of Property Grabbing in the South African Customary Law of Succession","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Legislature; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Estate; Vulnerability (computing); Law reform; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Common law","score_opus":0.04659250560921592,"score_gpt":0.3277579227932704,"score_spread":0.28116541718405447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415406449","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28401917,0.20313329,0.0000577175,0.059943296,0.0045007286,0.0016741008,0.00004258829,0.000025063138,0.44660404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953208,0.0025978524,0.00013661456,0.00016103755,0.00025202404,0.0000122219335,9.9052194e-8,0.000015005361,0.0015043211],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925759,0.0022088294,0.0021670787,0.00034932085,0.0019309778,0.0007679211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925584,0.0027323344,0.0025255706,0.00053375954,0.0015323111,0.000117593016],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00712281,0.00039090932,0.0012665703,0.00027983828,0.001762787,0.00018587438,0.0028978186,0.00013266742,0.000011858083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030258044,0.00017485098,0.0006037153,0.0031747178,0.0071086385,0.0006349051,0.0006029965,0.0010905056,0.0000019387908],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071990566,0.0004033841,0.01100997,0.00027528874,0.0009536411,0.00008513989,0.9273651,0.00009172667,0.00015607281,0.05096193,0.0017676097,0.0062102308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006708243,0.00071098213,0.0016507288,0.0013245508,0.0004595678,0.0000071712916,0.8522186,0.00002081726,0.00027766763,0.0023329246,0.14008513,0.00024099302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022047907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014778832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7113016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000369816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084362645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416193743","doi":"10.18357/anthropologica67120252751","title":"Rights and Responsibilities in Rural South Africa: Gender, Personhood, and the Crisis of Meaning, by Kathleen Rice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropologica","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Land rights; Rural development","score_opus":0.022329235214345277,"score_gpt":0.3150123787860534,"score_spread":0.29268314357170816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416193743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7078184,0.025052436,0.000038677597,0.00694393,0.00024578566,0.00048253642,0.000035500587,0.00007646683,0.2593063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965086,0.00039363073,0.00022850126,0.0001390689,0.000027085578,0.000013800573,6.918359e-7,0.0000037029931,0.0026849417],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983069,0.00068191875,0.00023540799,0.00025366037,0.00021697253,0.0003051681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988856,0.0007304197,0.0000924543,0.00019607342,0.000045095392,0.00005039956],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088502024,0.00012193658,0.00029207836,0.000081224876,0.00093500526,0.000058059766,0.00026252132,0.00013401684,0.00012382085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055768155,0.00007514837,0.00004474717,0.00038773348,0.0048440397,0.00011030305,0.00015855915,0.0001720291,0.0000025100176],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001441,0.000034123757,0.003611192,0.000013507697,0.000025914753,0.0000033338695,0.7493326,1.17840244e-7,0.000034535613,0.24233964,0.0043545207,0.00010643913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009311371,0.00007506552,0.00097647967,0.000022255923,0.00004891028,4.488897e-7,0.8766895,0.000014230381,0.0001736795,0.09441423,0.026500996,0.00015308551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00819836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039299708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2886902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031250016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004915626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416611325","doi":"10.2989/1814232x.2025.2570313","title":"Comparing seismic survey mitigation regulations: lessons for South Africa from international frameworks","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Marine Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Seismic survey; Survey data collection; Disaster mitigation","score_opus":0.04446905463044103,"score_gpt":0.3494937877881412,"score_spread":0.3050247331577002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416611325","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4690386,0.00047725602,0.19261709,0.030625843,0.009345278,0.0008554491,0.00015003454,0.00012918703,0.29676127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97875935,0.00001064163,0.019616533,0.00012188569,0.00033991958,0.000006837569,0.0000065860518,0.000007226852,0.0011310424],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976178,0.00021939297,0.0005480329,0.00028381558,0.00094801583,0.00038294052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964915,0.0011015586,0.0005586,0.00023989745,0.0014185075,0.00018994344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041863224,0.00011976635,0.0002657833,0.00046667128,0.00076865824,0.0003999997,0.001551288,0.00010775914,0.00008132412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070590423,0.000115097326,0.00010953905,0.0017260861,0.0011497951,0.0007435812,0.00034363067,0.0004167637,0.000005866845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000518861,0.0003680085,0.5231388,0.000018758285,0.00028899574,0.0000139071235,0.27963227,0.0090205865,0.0004503487,0.11498227,0.007394616,0.064172566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017817677,0.00015116815,0.6503257,0.00033985983,0.00014836386,0.0000024718888,0.030450037,0.0244022,0.00038192538,0.13281082,0.15858655,0.00061910873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068046834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031277532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50972074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004051624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010874291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8450843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416871784","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5818782","title":"(Mis)recognition of Customary Marriages: A Comparative Analysis of Canadian and South African Family Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Injustice; Statutory law; Economic Justice; Interpretation (philosophy)","score_opus":0.03326763832415882,"score_gpt":0.30758279631752816,"score_spread":0.27431515799336936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416871784","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31981578,0.016214726,0.0004399739,0.0011463738,0.00066036545,0.0008595705,0.0014247227,0.000049918483,0.65938854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99678916,0.0016892069,0.00023858866,0.000060483333,0.00014424432,0.000011179643,0.000044657816,0.0000088706,0.0010136209],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961799,0.00067009963,0.00064224505,0.0003688125,0.00057223835,0.0015667465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796206,0.00019665789,0.0007737109,0.0002729562,0.0005083752,0.0002862706],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025516595,0.00025426917,0.0009379775,0.0020373664,0.00039130886,0.00008549107,0.0006329957,0.00034889794,0.00006649639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015292343,0.00026016045,0.00037308325,0.002140627,0.0006709149,0.000119249584,0.00010323302,0.0023658567,0.0000030393774],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022107414,0.00015594106,0.005953478,0.00014682165,0.014349035,0.000013808384,0.6066174,0.00080668135,0.000039858074,0.3655239,0.00030093893,0.0058710505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013851139,0.00047158974,0.0049286922,0.00066697755,0.01303115,0.00000642766,0.6688008,0.0005238866,0.000093538,0.25807935,0.050527323,0.0014851541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5323779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8673179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67697334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016217817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011981194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417005967","doi":"10.17159/r3n3gv92","title":"What the Doctor Ordered: Lessons From Abroad to Strengthen South Africa’s Medical-Parole System","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Dignity; Legislation; Imprisonment; Criminal Conviction; Sentence; Value (mathematics)","score_opus":0.028892530347944798,"score_gpt":0.3352269723553151,"score_spread":0.3063344420073703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417005967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13899456,0.029287606,0.00060565956,0.13816702,0.03325647,0.0032948512,0.0008662712,0.00072786433,0.6547997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90995055,0.00015199861,0.00019247651,0.0023483306,0.0016973462,0.0001723172,0.000011759488,0.00004632572,0.085428916],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926868,0.0012948188,0.0010175538,0.0012790405,0.002287054,0.0014347495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955138,0.0013503826,0.00029800265,0.0017048848,0.00029684076,0.00083606434],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001723038,0.0006076861,0.0008262944,0.00019981225,0.0014627796,0.002277747,0.003392553,0.0007496042,0.007583579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010924437,0.00043443224,0.0003806275,0.0020008828,0.00095055415,0.00070911524,0.001247747,0.00094408164,0.005131221],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007958991,0.00016602624,0.0008638903,0.000080319915,0.0003838212,0.000050769435,0.903797,0.000019826586,0.000017808921,0.02731058,0.054575935,0.0126544805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005038537,0.0000418037,0.00022386384,0.0012680417,0.0002282016,3.011527e-7,0.15920427,0.0003702865,0.000042378786,0.0005389434,0.8371312,0.00044687217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003015392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013004021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7825552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005541176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010166181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417400764","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340125","title":"Beyond Bhe – Examining the Impact of Bhe v Magistrate Khayelitsha on the Customary Law of Succession and Gender Equality","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Magistrate; Legislature; Customary international law; Human rights; Commission; Rule of law; Ecological succession; International law; Family law","score_opus":0.09636516097035498,"score_gpt":0.4068332502368066,"score_spread":0.31046808926645164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417400764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72818667,0.049176995,0.000023511035,0.006713987,0.0009884681,0.0004239469,0.0000821562,0.000009792897,0.21439445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963977,0.0022204232,0.000071236995,0.00021849063,0.00035544042,0.000005120703,2.7006078e-7,0.000017837176,0.0007134959],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99320453,0.0025075458,0.001840502,0.00036612182,0.0014366757,0.0006446249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906938,0.0047602016,0.0025572733,0.0005266296,0.0012841006,0.00017799833],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073820455,0.00046509033,0.0012976984,0.00017678057,0.0014265951,0.00019313344,0.0013448695,0.00015353852,0.000086185624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021840858,0.00022667935,0.00052352675,0.001439733,0.0062773707,0.00056318566,0.00063642184,0.0010800922,0.0000021052244],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015368852,0.0006907001,0.036335696,0.00045948403,0.006485671,0.00008398942,0.6429247,0.0003182308,0.0013807472,0.2937915,0.008980028,0.0070123463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028012698,0.005224486,0.10688214,0.002330983,0.0025667476,0.000036123674,0.7719654,0.00009542095,0.0026436439,0.07522524,0.02912061,0.0011079265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025250593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018433192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26821098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007423589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417401061","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340126","title":"The Continued Struggle of Customary Law Wives for Recognition of Their Inheritance Rights in South Africa","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Legislature; Context (archaeology); Jurisprudence; Law reform; Customary international law; Family law; Magistrate","score_opus":0.03940335552585601,"score_gpt":0.3155829949943145,"score_spread":0.2761796394684585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417401061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5290494,0.2895184,0.00015920599,0.0050941966,0.004921685,0.0021434855,0.0005647934,0.000026089247,0.16852273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964903,0.0013287839,0.00074707094,0.000033885684,0.00030163693,0.00003217403,5.271442e-7,0.00001527047,0.0010503641],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951049,0.00088060455,0.0022374943,0.0003260338,0.0007609368,0.0006900353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99070597,0.0037905064,0.0027793085,0.00030851248,0.0023016965,0.00011398706],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029535627,0.00037901764,0.0015126825,0.0002666785,0.00095289573,0.00009792387,0.001093477,0.00016624533,0.000014685102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001825125,0.00025228751,0.0005604361,0.0015685577,0.0042865314,0.00058574026,0.00022156478,0.0005559202,0.0000015376991],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002596769,0.00055724155,0.0014258468,0.00037512658,0.002382066,0.000026234737,0.9138091,0.000021935855,0.0004924634,0.06626534,0.002650268,0.009397606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030846198,0.0016193805,0.00065933063,0.0027719433,0.0005825106,0.0000023353737,0.5126927,0.000015967687,0.0043672994,0.07791063,0.3958135,0.00047977862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003805199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001988364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46744087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028064713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046987386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417525542","doi":"10.20355/jcie29698","title":"Translating the Universal Declaration of Human Rights into Practice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Contemporary Issues in Education","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Declaration; Rhetoric; Human security; National security; Bologna declaration; International human rights law; Public policy; Security studies","score_opus":0.027962659524911893,"score_gpt":0.3990730451958557,"score_spread":0.3711103856709438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417525542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.413189,0.02172459,0.00059894257,0.07148279,0.0030900969,0.0005877599,8.835556e-7,0.000020617343,0.48930532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99591887,0.00003564599,0.0020432551,0.00011932088,0.00033940238,0.0000022771644,0.0000013140482,0.0000036945887,0.0015361926],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816644,0.0007139583,0.0005810216,0.00008157727,0.0003636056,0.00009341182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827605,0.0003482606,0.00064765353,0.00013731325,0.00055372395,0.000036976006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020507397,0.0000693626,0.00017924306,0.00023765318,0.0003060392,0.000056573175,0.00035826128,0.000082715815,0.000023868057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006808362,0.00005431402,0.00006180575,0.0005559753,0.00021211863,0.0012487932,0.000013755808,0.00025815642,0.0000015816142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012836697,0.00046045796,0.0065406207,0.000037256028,0.00006233695,0.0000061091287,0.7385384,0.000032998127,0.0008015119,0.23843296,0.0069923652,0.007966613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003236464,0.000087877124,0.00079779094,0.00026538875,0.000036177793,0.0000010421905,0.0902269,0.0000112112075,0.0007685592,0.03099498,0.8764149,0.00007151714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072257915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012250986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86942255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021689023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013520473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W45096477","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511835186","title":"Legal Aspects of Economic Integration in Africa","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; State (computer science); Situated; Economic integration; Political science; Economic community; Political economy; Law and economics; Economic system; Law; Sociology; Economics; Economy","score_opus":0.03166868806732721,"score_gpt":0.23789201090251455,"score_spread":0.20622332283518735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W45096477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014321413,0.00018414749,0.00004352493,0.0000074959166,0.00045270313,0.00040812537,0.00011421801,0.00007304978,0.99857354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11077718,0.000037391743,0.00008278042,0.0000056207623,0.00017833489,9.1660536e-7,0.000015807564,0.000021278565,0.88888067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985639,0.00018898575,0.00025810217,0.00038778075,0.0002500415,0.0003511992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895936,0.000096959615,0.00032561147,0.00037833242,0.000103051956,0.00013668742],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030987008,0.00022611137,0.00042501878,0.0002960985,0.00013668608,0.000036808004,0.00082750316,0.0004703914,0.000020775606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045450048,0.0002861058,0.0001622059,0.000025420946,0.00067796576,0.00022499874,0.00021864504,0.00045883772,0.000036283054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047951984,0.0000138570285,0.000003461164,0.000022450384,0.00002565193,0.00007698397,0.0124263475,0.0000012464815,0.000005448798,0.9600103,0.02693309,0.00043319695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027104234,0.00003585923,0.000009475484,0.00012593661,0.00006142979,3.8881194e-7,0.00079047907,0.000008856562,0.00017601257,0.00014673815,0.99810857,0.0002652075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009377576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007647171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9711755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013523548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012761366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W53876277","doi":"","title":"The human right of HIV positive persons to non-discrimination in getting life insurance in South Africa","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Life insurance; Business; Actuarial science; Medicine; Virology","score_opus":0.015376981192236096,"score_gpt":0.24928535247999145,"score_spread":0.23390837128775535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W53876277","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82132214,0.00017957836,0.0004911119,0.00049121195,0.00054628926,0.00035292475,0.000021353913,0.000017406861,0.176578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99680257,0.0000034014563,0.0010193579,0.000006600733,0.000079350604,0.000001547973,0.0000018966562,0.000004523203,0.0020807714],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984341,0.00029897998,0.00019245443,0.00025015042,0.0005655394,0.0002587273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990824,0.00019615586,0.00020256209,0.00017927821,0.00021837476,0.0001212615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007023147,0.00010152591,0.00018753218,0.00016305265,0.0011508961,0.00002586719,0.0003851089,0.0001209122,0.000012709607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005982875,0.00011207871,0.00007426529,0.0006352125,0.0007370389,0.00038868253,0.00006150791,0.00020649105,0.000006283682],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007206148,0.00012349074,0.08357041,0.000022790913,0.000024997702,0.000054893793,0.68235147,0.0015243981,0.0018012875,0.23014873,0.0002804284,0.000025017689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027670385,0.0002268827,0.46311125,0.00090452476,0.00008543568,0.0000037129225,0.437951,0.0003589146,0.0028363464,0.0027254953,0.0880626,0.00096679875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017548399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015708946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37954083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053704286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006015406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88518786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W571589029","doi":"","title":"Empowerinig the customer : the citizen in public sector reform","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Commonwealth Secretariat eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Service (business); Legislation; Consumer protection; Business; Product (mathematics); Public relations; Public administration; Political science; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.060169288814793956,"score_gpt":0.3114004068688801,"score_spread":0.25123111805408616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W571589029","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015212096,0.0018978375,0.0000095506275,0.008133475,0.0023801122,0.0021145914,0.00006788695,0.0002823386,0.9849621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18521462,0.00024825678,0.000037018075,0.0032741036,0.0026883776,0.0002640373,0.00006816549,0.00014445934,0.80806094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99350756,0.0012782775,0.001104658,0.0007754301,0.001640336,0.0016937192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953533,0.0010712577,0.00076789234,0.0020966234,0.00023644925,0.00047447448],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043864083,0.00068965164,0.00092419767,0.00030348075,0.0021270532,0.0006013659,0.0042238547,0.001089545,0.001426885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027633188,0.00042580656,0.00039397425,0.00038498963,0.002012652,0.00016779658,0.0007801503,0.0032606823,0.00078378204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009255589,0.000054283777,0.00059248926,0.00011513586,0.00020363292,0.00013140804,0.2775361,0.0000017668968,7.6319407e-7,0.57714295,0.12992823,0.014200659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034821508,0.00004394747,0.00012499977,0.000115174385,0.000051700295,0.000004222748,0.0034319614,0.000008370824,4.056195e-7,0.026941687,0.9684226,0.0005067274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013490619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08140691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83849436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034233285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004527693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W57840268","doi":"","title":"Practice and procedure : Default judgment - whether irregular - whether court has residual discretion not to set aside default judgment irregularly entered","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proctor/˜The œproctor","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Aside; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.031209756776568752,"score_gpt":0.32140707935036905,"score_spread":0.2901973225738003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W57840268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5280088,0.009695344,0.011690529,0.37311596,0.004576457,0.02232083,0.00083226565,0.0025541093,0.04720571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9690101,0.00003424187,0.0046633203,0.002422049,0.0016089355,0.000764953,0.000046724977,0.00015123977,0.021298429],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929741,0.00086122303,0.0009226632,0.0013424549,0.002491189,0.0014083781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968097,0.0004502291,0.000578735,0.0009239544,0.0006962712,0.0005410717],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002573859,0.00071373454,0.00060531404,0.00019226012,0.0017215788,0.0012788154,0.0011048664,0.00047025474,0.00036952025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011711968,0.00056465314,0.0001907533,0.0007726493,0.00096890033,0.001173793,0.00035424824,0.00068602426,0.00037675232],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035770137,0.002768462,0.008068443,0.0007546217,0.00090228644,0.00016616186,0.7114037,0.0005589977,0.032358006,0.014158136,0.21531206,0.0099720955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012270359,0.00036805702,0.0027315672,0.00021106347,0.00029313652,0.00002123341,0.014200311,0.00013190432,0.0034020827,0.00184006,0.97456986,0.0010036668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050995923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043189093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75925785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007609156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005431331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W605378001","doi":"","title":"Gender and equality law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Ashgate eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feminist legal theory; Sociology; Gender studies; Feminism; Intersectionality; Feminist theory; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06162550175721081,"score_gpt":0.3242279264604541,"score_spread":0.2626024247032433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W605378001","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000061344836,0.00089389074,0.000009045351,0.00007409389,0.0005905983,0.00047279443,0.000026106634,0.00019478498,0.9976773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05827372,0.000022217891,0.00025545698,0.0007796822,0.0009981442,0.000018786279,0.0000110325145,0.000049121132,0.9395918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979251,0.00023437513,0.0002931633,0.00045613843,0.0005985188,0.0004927108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987873,0.00018593085,0.00018469612,0.00042563977,0.00012664316,0.00028979604],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006524786,0.00027354425,0.00037182777,0.000046612055,0.0005203557,0.00025721488,0.0004294145,0.000607229,0.00072299805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057237343,0.00026519244,0.000101586105,0.00001902871,0.0014283344,0.00010390812,0.0002268973,0.0004881321,0.0012994556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001941577,0.0000036153535,0.0000054347915,0.00003433499,0.0000394916,0.0000075232606,0.06085959,2.7081597e-8,0.0000022839718,0.9110315,0.025884656,0.0021296171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087911,0.000010418168,0.0000062996824,0.000025962026,0.000037058555,3.7306017e-7,0.00039462867,4.4885644e-7,0.0000066151024,0.1583716,0.84077764,0.00028102595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033658019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074561784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.814893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019996852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047506738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W607177415","doi":"","title":"Strengthening ombudsman and human rights institutions in commonwealth small and island states : the Caribbean experience","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Complaint; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Public administration; Commission; Accountability; Constitution; Sociology","score_opus":0.038246839168161385,"score_gpt":0.3243750193872769,"score_spread":0.2861281802191155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W607177415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072612524,0.0010696494,0.0000076210918,0.00034084392,0.00011090025,0.00049925287,0.00005175489,0.00007777673,0.92522967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7380187,0.0001834927,0.00011205111,0.00009730635,0.0001874417,0.000027462307,0.000034206718,0.000014435839,0.2613249],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982691,0.00021100602,0.00035909133,0.0004177156,0.00031385932,0.00042924684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990543,0.00030942314,0.00012153324,0.00030473116,0.000036325702,0.00017366993],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000432663,0.00025457708,0.00032691314,0.00012321831,0.0021339012,0.00028930974,0.0004468681,0.00024973298,0.00027592308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026539405,0.00017903713,0.00003462226,0.00013964217,0.002141859,0.00017274517,0.00014471769,0.0005598615,0.000008996165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063545767,0.000026697344,0.0026261979,0.000021271246,0.000018458111,0.000021726124,0.6381509,0.00000982038,3.0792484e-7,0.35501927,0.003538843,0.0005601761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001991457,0.000035225195,0.00027880754,0.00009884743,0.000019040022,0.0000013012718,0.006474883,0.000009630723,0.0000012785017,0.019779569,0.9728288,0.00027347996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054776236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4243037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96928996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018980097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029704336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W609023248","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1206","title":"A Road to Home: The Right to Housing In Canada and Around the World","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wellesley Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Right to the city; Political science; Public administration; Law; Economic growth; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.030145471920515615,"score_gpt":0.3342277108108299,"score_spread":0.30408223889031427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W609023248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8376121,0.00022524931,0.000003116323,0.11247694,0.00029551866,0.00012028988,0.0000038046408,0.000002887463,0.049260117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883402,0.0000066317857,0.000038523445,0.008472581,0.0025683863,0.0000011953753,2.9770039e-8,0.000005020397,0.00056744297],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888897,0.00020613027,0.00019296947,0.00006123016,0.00040636316,0.0002443183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994428,0.00010128222,0.00009382343,0.00005265039,0.000089167326,0.00022025585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095510896,0.00006302777,0.00015711872,0.000058751102,0.00053138984,0.00018261462,0.0002303177,0.000027989685,0.0000042587935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016724426,0.00003616501,0.000024589073,0.00038779664,0.00020464817,0.00012366858,0.00006442782,0.00019405458,0.0000013614514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006178683,0.000017763425,0.0044100247,0.0000037599254,0.000027821729,0.000041978034,0.7915381,0.000025424317,0.000008778051,0.18243626,0.01564057,0.005787731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026757186,0.000032904234,0.006906013,0.0000164277,0.000012905735,0.0000035281648,0.02660646,0.000002202971,0.0000048705183,0.008276469,0.9577714,0.000099230834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96487564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94213086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005334048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015013028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40870747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W619865951","doi":"10.1163/9789004482128","title":"National Perspectives on Housing Rights","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Political science; Fundamental rights; Cultural rights; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.0277772318996029,"score_gpt":0.3260308464765297,"score_spread":0.2982536145769268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W619865951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000049643318,0.0005348319,0.000024476609,0.00027405148,0.0005894291,0.00018776442,0.000011872904,0.0001476145,0.998225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008085626,0.000022330054,0.0008420396,0.0002454338,0.0014657405,0.0000049405153,0.000006355306,0.000020985124,0.98930657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979328,0.00011610801,0.00013873655,0.00035626334,0.0012019122,0.00025421288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999181,0.00018618767,0.00009428753,0.00014143504,0.00030072965,0.00009640821],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000386754,0.00017002344,0.00018334997,0.00013423918,0.0006219085,0.00012346398,0.00027457342,0.00033934895,0.004570593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002485189,0.00014959753,0.000109606466,0.00010218368,0.0004412429,0.00010416246,0.000022135779,0.0003289297,0.0015806853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016115464,0.000015975402,8.9855206e-7,0.0000014522387,0.00001487059,0.0000029087817,0.040652283,0.0000017302071,4.2983586e-8,0.7522686,0.20700976,0.000029860099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005050778,0.000013441424,6.2730726e-7,0.000023383882,0.00000795145,9.781529e-8,0.0013585433,6.2806504e-7,0.0000014558492,0.14145996,0.856904,0.00017943453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018898734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003560412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64989424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014436056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013986113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W643519258","doi":"","title":"Reconstructing law and justice in a postcolony","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Indigenous; Political science; Comparative law; International law; Adjudication; Legislation; Law enforcement; Sociology","score_opus":0.02099535928535164,"score_gpt":0.3125496074605675,"score_spread":0.29155424817521586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W643519258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006771852,0.0008927918,0.0000016185198,0.00045130952,0.00034659938,0.0002238653,0.0000030315587,0.00008261398,0.99793047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00986466,0.000097402895,0.0030412239,0.0014546139,0.00076252146,0.0000033988792,0.0000028355191,0.000015213558,0.98475814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988469,0.00009511074,0.00022138421,0.000283572,0.0002495004,0.0003035446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992872,0.00032586674,0.00009950517,0.00013464125,0.000048484097,0.0001043032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051686156,0.00013749315,0.0002545635,0.0000764032,0.00024215932,0.00011218158,0.00021211331,0.00040303002,0.00035731756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002986467,0.00014116104,0.000033846565,0.000095164614,0.00048439155,0.00014563806,0.000058156867,0.00040153743,0.000079583326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045650445,0.0000062804525,0.00005533236,0.000028235767,0.0000058044416,0.000042549163,0.03821822,2.8763657e-7,3.2199665e-7,0.9477466,0.009502073,0.0043897633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009841916,0.000018290286,0.000004341215,0.00008571559,0.000034314784,0.000001939352,0.0017862344,0.0000035024464,5.697487e-7,0.037514314,0.960266,0.00018635202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025218732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009694784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95076394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002588884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003689732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57563806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W650993297","doi":"","title":"Interpreting convention rights : essential human rights cases of the Commomwealth","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Butterworths eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Charter; Human rights; Law; Convention; Political science; Fundamental rights; Right to a fair trial; Freedom of thought; Right to property; Bill of rights; International human rights law; Conscience; Linguistic rights; Ex post facto law","score_opus":0.0201401076219856,"score_gpt":0.3149354175850776,"score_spread":0.294795309963092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W650993297","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007367512,0.00015321025,0.000037537087,0.00010239308,0.0017791777,0.00094769825,0.00006759269,0.00014933449,0.98939556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4946352,0.0000011314254,0.000029179428,0.000073267045,0.0008962129,0.000017410259,0.000024106937,0.000029380479,0.5042941],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962238,0.00065217825,0.0008899265,0.0005344798,0.0010836526,0.000615965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99726653,0.00033242826,0.0011302433,0.000846305,0.0002446526,0.00017986438],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072011334,0.00041972336,0.000651691,0.00016025633,0.0020603864,0.00013942184,0.001317625,0.00057639816,0.00068027474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057020483,0.00032292167,0.0005193489,0.00008528372,0.0017286103,0.00008837318,0.0003564296,0.00080851355,0.00007200851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087296095,0.00018126755,0.0011833122,0.00037810882,0.0004316034,0.0004078937,0.1161732,0.000002808489,0.00005415704,0.7909323,0.088281505,0.0018865278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023530047,0.000053027416,0.000022983655,0.0008899741,0.00015310211,0.0000075737244,0.000107405685,0.0000015358918,0.0002467753,0.05043914,0.94748175,0.00036142874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012363184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041031566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85920024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004428046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004615786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W652506007","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780195328103.003.0007","title":"Review of Laws Having Racially Disparate Impacts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disparate impact; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Race (biology); Context (archaeology); Law; White (mutation); Equal Protection Clause; Disparate treatment; Civil rights; Housing discrimination; Phenomenon; Sociology; History; Gender studies; Plaintiff","score_opus":0.04351004289165949,"score_gpt":0.34124635487102506,"score_spread":0.29773631197936556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W652506007","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000019232034,0.1510573,0.000011030264,0.00047203564,0.00031459072,0.0004120244,0.000023233542,0.00007929267,0.8476286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016098181,0.25041902,0.0004642993,0.0012100572,0.00045228668,0.0000043075906,0.0000114060285,0.00003835561,0.7457904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979608,0.00006995714,0.00056526513,0.0003128855,0.0007353393,0.00035577378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984118,0.00013867665,0.0005002199,0.0004395497,0.0002896618,0.00022012655],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006058722,0.00026885618,0.00071508624,0.00007055515,0.00023073953,0.000030990625,0.0005657807,0.00034581538,0.005867092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004781183,0.00023397422,0.0002996482,0.000075802316,0.0006048443,0.00016980815,0.00012338943,0.0003183901,0.0008521485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014688377,0.0000318623,0.000041505602,0.0036298798,0.00012867751,0.00008396074,0.032489315,4.1624295e-7,0.000005359511,0.58425975,0.3715166,0.0077980044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052156873,0.000019936058,0.000004354836,0.0068167653,0.00006141943,9.158247e-7,0.000027160919,1.537872e-7,0.0000057652423,0.0012245069,0.99152064,0.00026622394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009861218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010661554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62000406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014665192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057994336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W652668216","doi":"","title":"The Malling of Property Law?: The Toronto Eaton Centre Cases, 1984-1987, and the Right to Exclude","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01967884701109915,"score_gpt":0.29394705477513694,"score_spread":0.2742682077640378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W652668216","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027440714,0.014669952,0.00003382817,0.021867465,0.0007254481,0.0017213447,0.0000072517582,0.00007663365,0.9334574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970906,0.00015116697,0.00017119141,0.00080098514,0.00035564345,0.000023715109,2.58268e-7,0.000008521892,0.027582482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833775,0.00047488482,0.000197727,0.00013149185,0.00042267825,0.00043545073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837667,0.0009797806,0.000069767724,0.0003592662,0.00007857985,0.00013593183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00196895,0.00010338967,0.00015250762,0.0000043873206,0.0012924388,0.00014174305,0.0005611902,0.00005725919,0.00032420887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045135312,0.00003092208,0.000060731305,0.00010722261,0.00089195446,0.00025286348,0.0001749114,0.000101392805,0.00003649914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060009286,0.000031817934,0.0011453835,0.000023260074,0.000034047294,0.0000013224508,0.3385234,0.0000012708452,0.000018898969,0.655744,0.0034695913,0.0009469767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017494833,0.000015922504,0.00007858949,0.000030281211,0.0000380948,0.0000012192186,0.035101112,0.000014489583,0.00030560326,0.000449612,0.96369684,0.00009330341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07197801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10235673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96022725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008492516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037202135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W655024480","doi":"10.2307/486360","title":"Black Lawyers, White Courts: The Soul of South African Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Law; White (mutation); Political science; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04081084140700945,"score_gpt":0.2721514198078341,"score_spread":0.23134057840082464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W655024480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7484795,0.020495366,0.000077748606,0.021706454,0.0023422209,0.0009733741,0.00030752912,0.00007714039,0.20554066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993964,0.0005911554,0.00065733766,0.0004315065,0.0012714764,0.000018985198,0.0000018674838,0.000073494375,0.002990142],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950495,0.0005953587,0.0013631963,0.00047981704,0.00055111095,0.0019610466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923064,0.00090395816,0.0013131095,0.00074890314,0.0026418094,0.0020858063],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028180436,0.00052888953,0.001259587,0.0006221085,0.0019133925,0.00021127022,0.0020736097,0.00020074974,0.00019280346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037240481,0.0004171716,0.0005044496,0.0023338422,0.008302203,0.00049369736,0.00012105906,0.00063581666,0.000016544018],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006969735,0.00004191393,0.011582725,0.00009174786,0.00077455584,0.0007890381,0.8390653,0.0003038079,0.000014963961,0.14324276,0.0033744783,0.0006490118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003370414,0.00027873574,0.00093070825,0.00021668649,0.0002673716,0.00007372656,0.39706567,0.0000073581355,0.0000046864698,0.004681015,0.59573716,0.00039986437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09347101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86800295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77453196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020203881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018439669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6892489307","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.10003533","title":"The Concept of Automatic Disqualification or Mandatory Recusal by Judges with Interest in Matters Before them: The Unsettling and Its Impact on Judicial Corruption in Nigeria","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Economic Justice; Politics; Statute; Language change; Doctrine; Judicial opinion; Skepticism; Public interest","score_opus":0.0583047241381296,"score_gpt":0.3274472191566251,"score_spread":0.2691424950184955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6892489307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99139893,0.000047057438,0.000026760674,0.004216541,0.00005916681,0.0005548428,0.00009226016,0.00018774605,0.0034167138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992988,0.000053843323,0.000004611205,0.00006971887,0.000042066178,2.1921001e-7,0.00013047869,0.00016507364,0.00023515985],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833035,0.00073650636,0.00021541005,0.00018477521,0.00028359127,0.00024938717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993706,0.00017837419,0.00012198119,0.0001671096,0.00010673152,0.000055234752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015294609,0.00008392271,0.000104750936,0.00010009429,0.0010772353,0.00029783393,0.0004968616,0.00004305234,0.0006909552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007711722,0.00004909407,0.000015828185,0.00077664875,0.00042818172,0.0001659592,0.00018801758,0.00019225592,0.0003742556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012779018,0.00027882526,0.0019223627,0.00012543092,0.00009426572,0.000028809727,0.6983053,0.00026252092,0.0016815765,0.024756655,0.122852,0.14841434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030293574,0.0019773333,0.06397747,0.0007807387,0.000041874046,0.000021437698,0.1552266,0.005918201,0.0008213875,0.0018600374,0.7656063,0.0007392437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009683521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007992831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6427543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017298067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010621335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8285332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6893526805","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4707350","title":"Get back your ex lover permanently +27789189922 Newcastle Pietermaritzburg Pinetown Ulundi Umlazi Limpopo Giyani","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Romance; MAGIC (telescope); Passion; Commit; Witness; Humiliation; Regret; Mistake","score_opus":0.066983656726909,"score_gpt":0.30942753313537613,"score_spread":0.24244387640846715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6893526805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016969478,0.0004986014,0.00062662584,0.0036546828,0.00055819826,0.0004805993,0.00024330568,0.0007759255,0.9761926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8813629,0.00039952758,0.0009266506,0.00095362234,0.001422048,5.3710853e-8,0.0013881566,0.0017275361,0.111819506],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962502,0.0008710673,0.00037890175,0.0006717524,0.0009889872,0.00083905103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772763,0.000052713553,0.0001483241,0.00072013034,0.00087302155,0.00047818976],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089689484,0.00022986055,0.00025462266,0.00015687084,0.002470251,0.0018127384,0.0014904249,0.00016515744,0.107146345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013033615,0.0002612564,0.00012970316,0.00096404104,0.000499267,0.0005226087,0.0016690097,0.0004783864,0.06424251],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009242907,0.0004760898,0.00014037763,0.000108482214,0.0001285913,0.00030197168,0.08442473,0.0000542932,0.0038425457,0.016424691,0.8561605,0.03784527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048665758,0.00009743721,0.0004208497,0.000028403754,0.000022311135,0.000042408315,0.003061544,0.000098309116,0.00026388577,0.00023749286,0.9949301,0.00031062466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002890536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013344021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8643934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003786236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000366482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6910463632","doi":"10.4102/satnt.v24i1&amp;amp;2.167","title":"’n Dekade van demokrasie: omgewingsbestuur in ’n veranderende wêreld","year":2005,"lang":"af","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Die (integrated circuit); Fraternity","score_opus":0.2840603014863588,"score_gpt":0.5912630799197168,"score_spread":0.307202778433358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6910463632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6743617,0.104704596,0.0001799565,0.0023080765,0.0027594394,0.0014994238,0.00011149312,0.00014324616,0.21393207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97738224,0.012852238,0.0005832665,0.00074797956,0.0019970925,0.00005881386,0.00001330328,0.00014374379,0.006221327],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898359,0.001618663,0.0026541457,0.0013050472,0.0027226855,0.0018635383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99426484,0.0012259721,0.001991146,0.0010613318,0.0005112937,0.0009454086],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050568343,0.00092434406,0.0020126996,0.0016282828,0.0010744694,0.0041290172,0.008595982,0.00072307576,0.031230839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015075966,0.00095337606,0.00057699287,0.0041407887,0.0009411066,0.006848473,0.0021496294,0.0019825057,0.0004624332],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035230856,0.0014159075,0.84060085,0.00015108801,0.0003773369,0.00024676792,0.031949777,0.0015909201,0.003611584,0.00077053584,0.083251834,0.035681117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002505649,0.00003287015,0.43082893,0.0014672016,0.00036596437,0.0000122658175,0.0023296706,0.00031370754,0.004674357,0.011464772,0.54406554,0.0019390815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017900739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005584608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4608137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001035837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009030458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6912458403","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4707608","title":"Same day lost love spell +27789189922 Krugersdorp Pretoria Randburg Randfontein Roodepoort Soweto Springs Vanderbijlpark Greyton Greytown Griekwastad Groblersdal Groblershoop Groot Marico Haenertsburg Hammanskraal Hankey Harrismith Hartbeespoort Hattingspruit Hazyview Hectorspruit Heidelberg Heidelberg Heilbron","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Commit; Passion; Romance; MAGIC (telescope); Spell; Regret; Witness; Mistake; Humiliation","score_opus":0.03313571867822561,"score_gpt":0.26668217095675695,"score_spread":0.23354645227853132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6912458403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06698898,0.00820254,0.015193718,0.01662901,0.0054505295,0.0055566086,0.0008115742,0.003472009,0.877695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.896217,0.0012694263,0.0012810739,0.0009899104,0.0022747433,6.7762807e-7,0.0011638568,0.0030864493,0.0937169],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881816,0.0026932217,0.0015690909,0.0023224906,0.0027863227,0.0024472743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936136,0.0003309743,0.00077516795,0.0017062763,0.0021370691,0.0014369],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048383377,0.0010056237,0.0012560806,0.0005200872,0.0035835314,0.0037562153,0.003009699,0.00059940334,0.049304947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036845205,0.0011117106,0.00059255556,0.00245067,0.0012643192,0.0020614062,0.002643739,0.0015744732,0.024322378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023935146,0.0020777632,0.0016101474,0.0010696173,0.0016765683,0.0020394253,0.1472507,0.0014279818,0.011166677,0.021379458,0.7742461,0.033662066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029457642,0.0002957416,0.0006454395,0.00035626165,0.00020484575,0.000102371516,0.004127727,0.00026168372,0.0017614762,0.0007063819,0.9872992,0.0012930994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017041272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031170784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.829228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001406841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019993128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6922616645","doi":"10.13140/rg.2.2.35636.24962","title":"PrEP interest, eligibility and initiation by MSM and transwomen in Cape Town and Port Elizabeth, South Africa","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cape; Port (circuit theory); Population; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.03308564114772294,"score_gpt":0.31284733283668975,"score_spread":0.2797616916889668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6922616645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9239428,0.00092756184,0.00022864959,0.0013792439,0.00005228601,0.00029059488,0.00002650062,0.00006232884,0.073090024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99698526,0.00019214464,0.0003139021,0.000076365766,0.00003816425,0.000014086955,0.0000010547897,0.0000070534707,0.0023719904],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988026,0.00014212773,0.00022681718,0.00036248422,0.00018408531,0.0002818764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994189,0.00018661704,0.000051899868,0.00013334783,0.000040456733,0.00016874561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078514183,0.00010957331,0.0001706174,0.0000536386,0.00011916929,0.00007952691,0.000096779055,0.000119312965,0.0002046499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029700313,0.00007792893,0.000013977099,0.00014056773,0.00045617856,0.00037402447,0.00005922326,0.00007767991,0.000004478802],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074085554,0.00008125076,0.2707147,0.00003429755,0.000018804925,0.00000670226,0.7034602,6.327059e-8,0.0014698078,0.005810879,0.0016239333,0.016705249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008865929,0.0010144692,0.1810281,0.0004200976,0.000143503,0.000007993372,0.10033978,0.0001172517,0.0038796857,0.08686267,0.61461455,0.0027060036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000671643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011564954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6129906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000061402076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000500574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31778497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6967838060","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.11461809","title":"IN Bram Fischerville/Mount Fletcher [[[[WhatsApp ((( (+27) 0633867063))) *____**)) ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN Bram Fischerville/Mount Fletcher KEMPTON PARK, GAUTENG JOHANNESBURG CBD. ABU DHABI, ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE Bram Fischerville/Mount Fletcher WhatsApp ((( (+27) 0633867063)))","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pill; Abortion; Mythology; Context (archaeology); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.03522970299789088,"score_gpt":0.30340770936277056,"score_spread":0.26817800636487965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6967838060","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019971,0.008930502,0.0045627323,0.03680109,0.011360587,0.037220586,0.83743185,0.0055360077,0.03818565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06098934,0.008257622,0.0030213837,0.006457836,0.008204419,0.00016924649,0.8932742,0.008953704,0.010672273],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9802932,0.0038823902,0.0037642042,0.0043731113,0.0035708295,0.0041162693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892976,0.0010138287,0.0022282396,0.003094458,0.00273062,0.0016352003],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008324683,0.0023363638,0.0027199255,0.0018084691,0.003778563,0.0042693294,0.00647335,0.002882702,0.02007163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075845723,0.0026091756,0.0010482994,0.004770035,0.001432509,0.0032889731,0.00308143,0.0040886314,0.012667116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012353598,0.001466567,0.000047348654,0.0014766998,0.00042616582,0.00013519023,0.017540662,0.0005441911,0.002021723,0.0017407886,0.9690571,0.0043082433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004932126,0.0009345272,0.00037089948,0.0009295879,0.00032928752,0.00002540502,0.006799996,0.000907722,0.00042696434,0.0005756716,0.9809148,0.0028530497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055763144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014096918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055842325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005909571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045579937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6968669182","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4707674","title":"+27789189922 Quick Reacting Revenge Spells / Punish Your Enemy, Death Revenge Spells Amos London Chandler Whitehorse Gracefield North West Klerksdorp Mahikeng Mmabatho Potchefstroom Rustenburg Northern Cape Kimberley Kuruman Port Nolloth Western Cape Bellville Cape Town Constantia George Hopefield Oudtshoorn Paarl Simon's Town Stellenbosch Swellendam Worcester","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; MAGIC (telescope); Commit; Romance; Passion; Agency (philosophy); Mistake; Witness; Temptation; Cape","score_opus":0.044026416246285775,"score_gpt":0.2745897131878397,"score_spread":0.23056329694155392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6968669182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3706455,0.0020297302,0.00032952827,0.0031828554,0.0010650582,0.0019942597,0.0006056339,0.00086780504,0.6192796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9060158,0.001358372,0.00044691126,0.00046418604,0.001183402,4.5885207e-7,0.00087206,0.0013913526,0.08826745],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911181,0.0016908878,0.001333169,0.0018598166,0.0019213929,0.0020766691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99433005,0.00028893433,0.0008279038,0.0018095456,0.0016844288,0.0010591309],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002328362,0.0008563116,0.001002974,0.00043898963,0.0032511714,0.0021799484,0.002453302,0.0005907713,0.05431046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014395067,0.00094063533,0.00038340114,0.0017298856,0.0005838606,0.001284759,0.0025082945,0.0018739143,0.013314575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017418785,0.0047556655,0.11010856,0.0013169335,0.0023403806,0.007953005,0.44065428,0.0008086187,0.0066849357,0.006081754,0.31001127,0.1075427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013368994,0.00028187173,0.001393819,0.00032053734,0.00020593916,0.00011048098,0.016267117,0.000047315298,0.00060969306,0.00006432045,0.97820634,0.0011556771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00228376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039006295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66819507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005974135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016625537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6979709164","doi":"","title":"Access to justice for children with disabilities : the South African context","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Economic Justice; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Vulnerability (computing); Face (sociological concept)","score_opus":0.024932641230377164,"score_gpt":0.2855014813932423,"score_spread":0.26056884016286513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6979709164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6728976,0.0006171909,0.0030129245,0.00360748,0.009392494,0.0046917126,0.00086754235,0.00026276612,0.30465034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9503423,0.000009819542,0.00038098713,0.000024669549,0.0011446045,0.00001369745,0.000049919923,0.000017290431,0.04801671],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804467,0.00013983408,0.0001648058,0.0004645429,0.0008602774,0.0003258473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978479,0.000471855,0.0003567798,0.00038800537,0.0007382922,0.00019712564],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032022997,0.00022454184,0.00032605653,0.000094237446,0.0028807435,0.00013137447,0.0012929107,0.000267233,0.00006354089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006541482,0.00018453569,0.00017238861,0.000290575,0.0012252372,0.0005782168,0.00009023339,0.00020388837,0.000019099241],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021457344,0.00011911834,0.019104563,0.00026226277,0.0005360144,0.00001083089,0.76414645,0.00021038255,0.00006061632,0.20333512,0.009041952,0.0010269374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012341865,0.0003193061,0.026765825,0.0007400282,0.001429065,0.0000034843772,0.5460482,0.0000073434994,0.00029381088,0.001140829,0.42104152,0.0009763778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004561964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007344838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41199955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005532514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017439651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980053248","doi":"","title":"Aspects of corporate governance in South African public higher education institutions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Unisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Central University of Technology; Dartmouth College","keywords":"Corporate governance; Higher education; Accountability; Fiduciary; Government (linguistics); Constitution; Legislature; Democracy; Public sector","score_opus":0.047829847445294386,"score_gpt":0.25544970120549204,"score_spread":0.20761985376019765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980053248","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07213892,0.0017019241,0.00005302061,0.00042263864,0.0023349286,0.00055634725,0.00022495593,0.000105107036,0.92246217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724259,0.000040375267,0.0007691068,0.00001607996,0.00025634945,0.0000045583547,0.00025660376,0.00002053247,0.026210517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968695,0.0002622825,0.000514567,0.000644648,0.0012906331,0.00041838788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996627,0.000078902696,0.0017074636,0.00042282895,0.00080819137,0.00035566077],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027386897,0.00032696643,0.000610435,0.00031863595,0.0010872511,0.000061608866,0.0011083039,0.00053189154,0.00031931643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003434674,0.00043569796,0.00026887126,0.001647365,0.0017703479,0.00069208606,0.00011302581,0.00061427127,0.00006265432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014767896,0.0002836218,0.0020280133,0.0001566035,0.00007767448,0.00007775058,0.1956341,0.00011479934,0.00016303733,0.8009685,0.00020353244,0.00014463741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001118013,0.00014652111,0.034228913,0.00079895207,0.00031527772,0.0000023082537,0.12831974,0.000043495664,0.0001607549,0.005470504,0.82836396,0.0010315775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022479733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001034077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.900287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010132829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011702808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6982677247","doi":"","title":"KalaChasma))1844-461-2828-Netgear router tech support phone number 1844-461-2828 Netgear router Technical Support phone number 1844*461*2828&amp;gt;&amp;gt;Success","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Router; Core router; One-armed router; Phone; Telephone number","score_opus":0.020129653636588998,"score_gpt":0.31865445268967585,"score_spread":0.2985247990530869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6982677247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024970376,0.00003406017,0.003320583,0.0018273487,0.0052865352,0.0054986295,0.0008938199,0.0030798067,0.9775622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.073604226,0.0007458904,0.011616265,0.001030353,0.004069929,0.0017202044,0.00055320235,0.0019254016,0.90473455],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97242516,0.003176935,0.0038854675,0.009706162,0.005659115,0.005147166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97880423,0.0012571717,0.0028483823,0.0135323545,0.0009721133,0.002585743],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012656727,0.0033846395,0.0040204315,0.0009859542,0.001424768,0.0015918347,0.00999726,0.005534732,0.93190044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003825549,0.0034051565,0.0020398118,0.0019800197,0.004351549,0.0016835779,0.008176561,0.0044346284,0.95121163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047997845,0.0016751825,0.0314756,0.00039684848,0.0011294011,0.00039438417,0.01645507,0.000018775121,0.0014183517,0.0016965228,0.9374715,0.0073884036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002628499,0.0000095279565,0.0011289944,0.0007935174,0.00061211904,0.00018830124,0.00039379467,0.0000071465224,0.00091987854,0.002094557,0.98734266,0.003880986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007383634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005010698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07282765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028562187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022590416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6984241281","doi":"","title":"Footy Round Up 16","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"League; Period (music)","score_opus":0.008705460783114584,"score_gpt":0.2236818040514332,"score_spread":0.21497634326831863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6984241281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000042406605,0.0006011291,0.0000016535291,0.00028004253,0.0013271929,0.00047878665,0.00007495566,0.00037223948,0.9968598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003575341,0.00019312912,0.00056812825,0.00034687505,0.0008738219,0.000016345455,0.000070174654,0.00013762311,0.9942186],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754804,0.00023186814,0.0006050281,0.00024284856,0.0008784694,0.00049373007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981918,0.00019678044,0.0007072122,0.00048540416,0.00019594564,0.0002228548],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006175682,0.0003326179,0.00048958097,0.00008646009,0.0002053031,0.00013848604,0.00072024623,0.00070753763,0.654054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005382159,0.0003390969,0.00020239166,0.000014047007,0.0004149629,2.554664e-7,0.000117322896,0.00033855689,0.055814732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022477503,0.00001885469,0.0000028258492,0.00016291183,0.000041356183,0.00000385209,0.0035818717,0.000009578131,1.3998021e-8,0.0011052947,0.9936148,0.0014361544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000306907,0.00006098646,0.0000011733889,0.00015080666,0.000047182944,0.00000339865,0.0005935851,0.0000016098679,9.752198e-7,0.00005875947,0.99839973,0.00037486176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04430705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016723987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59823924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017317469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000089327914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986201470","doi":"","title":"Pathological vs non-pathological incapacity: are the differences in requirements and consequences justified?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Element (criminal law); Set (abstract data type); Order (exchange); Criminal law; Work (physics); Raising (metalworking)","score_opus":0.05515419264473335,"score_gpt":0.28562019867846716,"score_spread":0.23046600603373382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986201470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8266986,0.000459436,0.000020464015,0.0015897728,0.00027232693,0.0007259567,0.00013720388,0.000027002248,0.17006922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9662237,0.0016834725,0.0007940568,0.00005887192,0.0000341406,3.6056645e-7,0.00010992179,0.000009120722,0.031086328],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968714,0.00078185124,0.00028059652,0.0007667828,0.0008323816,0.00046700085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977326,0.00036765437,0.0007974692,0.00044809742,0.00044773574,0.00020645846],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092826516,0.00033154493,0.0010673353,0.00022014056,0.0011037678,0.00012344439,0.002529749,0.00072854914,0.003037136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031920278,0.0003352048,0.00020394735,0.0006637472,0.0030466171,0.00071447477,0.0008361949,0.0006866363,0.000015191925],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036195666,0.0010995246,0.101975575,0.00059474446,0.0005325791,0.0051958035,0.84342045,0.000011592307,0.0016757377,0.020155577,0.0070452224,0.014673632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014176347,0.0002785127,0.100947104,0.00057795574,0.0003854932,0.0000050434583,0.87086356,0.00002415772,0.000046352063,0.0012458375,0.023559505,0.00064884225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027373062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05889455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13952512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001927621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006474793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986511192","doi":"","title":"Problematic aspects of the right to bail under South African law : a comparison with Canadian law and proposals for reform","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Law reform; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Common law; Work (physics); Inheritance (genetic algorithm)","score_opus":0.012555987032548156,"score_gpt":0.24060820086957171,"score_spread":0.22805221383702357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986511192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11614717,0.00017037579,0.00019096507,0.0012634664,0.0012812384,0.0030398653,0.00012228299,0.0000459286,0.8777387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98732364,0.000001326165,0.002010113,0.000029675877,0.00013060363,0.000010452071,0.000028138189,0.000013316799,0.010452716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983159,0.00010153142,0.00020499443,0.0003407543,0.000744422,0.00029244294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820244,0.00007218055,0.0004326786,0.00030410048,0.00068678113,0.00030182378],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024970085,0.00019222136,0.00040646482,0.00010190705,0.0017981871,0.000064059124,0.000538237,0.000286554,0.000026847387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054414144,0.00016551641,0.00010049882,0.00030797484,0.0010957152,0.00036955182,0.000045755693,0.00021615572,0.0000044967933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009695038,0.000038534257,0.00014201783,0.0002665935,0.00011077589,0.000004149971,0.096892804,0.0001054634,0.0001574202,0.90201944,0.00015930126,0.000006550835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023215567,0.0010193406,0.004836916,0.00454962,0.0017773537,0.000009997743,0.43649048,0.0002517582,0.005553413,0.03145901,0.50976557,0.001964984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41216865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71285033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8711765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011379005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028545447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987085448","doi":"","title":"Sex for sale : a comparative analysis of legal models and the socio-economic determinants informing law reform in South Africa","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Unisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legislation; Law reform; Normative; Context (archaeology); Interpretation (philosophy); Politics; Unemployment; Underpinning; Harm","score_opus":0.03832112884352523,"score_gpt":0.28081047166496864,"score_spread":0.2424893428214434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987085448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5907643,0.0004607087,0.00018985856,0.000032014817,0.00047875906,0.0009974669,0.00060839177,0.000066906454,0.4064016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98409474,0.000016973076,0.0003794222,0.0000034312548,0.000057211306,0.000009313665,0.00012358806,0.00001101729,0.0153043205],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997981,0.00015769289,0.0005047297,0.00042562574,0.0005692408,0.00036172263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807245,0.00038350635,0.00085363584,0.00028872397,0.00027822284,0.00012343966],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077626645,0.0002529647,0.00093798403,0.00046675932,0.0015965113,0.00006222196,0.00066333014,0.00036386598,0.000011530936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006345845,0.00025403296,0.00043838762,0.0006588281,0.0024080249,0.0006073369,0.00012397792,0.00029401775,0.0000065964364],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051568716,0.000029704268,0.00033253993,0.000075136035,0.0005169319,0.000014825078,0.8031046,0.0029653376,0.000007087093,0.19238813,0.000011967393,0.000038051287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021480855,0.00008046317,0.0010965007,0.00021185615,0.0019488093,9.01564e-7,0.95314413,0.02225186,0.000038336406,0.0024713823,0.016058786,0.00054889725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012167025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010791872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39333045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007879697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011085086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989196233","doi":"","title":"Advancing the right to education for First Nations children: Lessons in administrative dialogue from the South African constitutional experience","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Constitution; Human rights; Legislation; Right to education; Constitutional right","score_opus":0.025978215360173668,"score_gpt":0.3309598144570081,"score_spread":0.3049815990968344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989196233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64786965,0.0004356314,0.000014358747,0.0019924217,0.005939167,0.0059910594,0.011098712,0.00021964424,0.32643935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926183,0.000030201181,0.0011961326,0.00042934006,0.00060782424,0.0022139505,0.0011259414,0.000051472984,0.0017268213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959658,0.00058137946,0.00071385945,0.0010026648,0.0009703406,0.00076595484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955959,0.0021286511,0.0005565656,0.0006745304,0.00073156646,0.0003128175],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012077816,0.0004904353,0.00044244138,0.00024205059,0.008439402,0.00029355864,0.0016812028,0.00046321034,0.00023564341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010366308,0.0003790471,0.00023755465,0.0013836558,0.0010940251,0.00067389756,0.00011383428,0.0008454357,0.0001953643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012576146,0.00024308245,0.00033417923,0.000019363673,0.000074100644,0.0000018110553,0.039080158,0.000019371364,0.00009244804,0.9565552,0.00011108866,0.0033434457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053813064,0.000114827184,0.0044469195,0.0008025392,0.00018166976,0.0000018179883,0.0706047,0.0000044139583,0.0020617913,0.056879036,0.86325175,0.0011123812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005254634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28964356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89967614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012405929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012051065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990801151","doi":"","title":"Eli Lilly v Government of Canada: the tale of promise v expectation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation; Public policy; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.009613906869454271,"score_gpt":0.232641735591238,"score_spread":0.22302782872178373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990801151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43224993,0.00042098243,0.0032490003,0.01195745,0.00023669956,0.00042832442,0.00003571397,0.000044658642,0.55137724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840097,0.000034148856,0.0035868336,0.00004091944,0.000030568288,0.000015268499,0.0000041746594,0.000009328361,0.012269075],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99615204,0.0021503074,0.00030626377,0.00019016989,0.0009880078,0.00021319781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965399,0.00088911696,0.00035627958,0.0006827409,0.0014457204,0.000086250184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035097422,0.000085136955,0.00013762905,0.000021145564,0.00044760783,0.000039403967,0.00074422976,0.000054867243,0.00025581516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029461542,0.00007201289,0.000052396554,0.00039537944,0.0007882443,0.000106752486,0.0001550777,0.00009190921,0.0000044950953],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033432836,0.00038688426,0.010713766,0.000044694236,0.00005356721,0.0000013034052,0.6697503,0.000005953917,0.007451814,0.2866237,0.007006279,0.01792831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008883434,0.0000030413212,0.025192106,0.0006504949,0.0000611743,0.0000011575188,0.026762547,0.0013141177,0.46407574,0.0027933843,0.47780782,0.00045008006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1883261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49297538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6429877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018928143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006840685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8170789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991298623","doi":"","title":"Flexibility and differentiation: A plea for allowing national differentiation in the fundamental rights domain","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Council on Foreign Relations","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Flexibility (engineering); Domain (mathematical analysis); Variety (cybernetics)","score_opus":0.055304565306178194,"score_gpt":0.3281979367015723,"score_spread":0.27289337139539416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991298623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3487029,0.0044888426,0.0026372534,0.002276877,0.0024194384,0.005313309,0.0072152293,0.00028794992,0.6266582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873237,0.00019160828,0.00061635475,0.00012886939,0.0012609707,0.000041277428,0.003193306,0.000026701968,0.0072171907],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769235,0.00022864819,0.0003618843,0.00071819284,0.0006445694,0.00035438014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979846,0.0008409491,0.0003254972,0.0007066058,0.000045035515,0.00009732166],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001621418,0.0002939711,0.000336548,0.000084531195,0.001852866,0.0006440888,0.0014322229,0.00019180113,0.00002863921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003666039,0.00022508879,0.00006600554,0.000026928086,0.0003927329,0.00052114023,0.000571374,0.00034307758,0.0000033479246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004258746,0.0002114093,0.030439163,0.0010197604,0.0005474291,0.00001947436,0.5767101,0.00004585535,0.000022779494,0.37471774,0.0013502778,0.014490166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011936162,0.00006846007,0.0513142,0.0010199723,0.0002294282,0.0000032769972,0.0027669254,0.01739273,4.9482406e-7,0.37206125,0.5531124,0.000837261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013406319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04104616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6386208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000086808745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060400987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991584681","doi":"","title":"Home Office Expenditure: A critical analysis of the applicable law governing the deductibility of home workspace expenses incurred by persons in employment - given the shift to working from home","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Legislature; Internal revenue; Statutory law; Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory interpretation; Common law; Tax law; Service (business)","score_opus":0.024976628264374707,"score_gpt":0.2850141485813095,"score_spread":0.26003752031693483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991584681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9681416,0.0006763871,0.00011241882,0.0033002705,0.0004402811,0.00153086,0.0010139631,0.00004031735,0.024743898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98840135,0.00009295021,0.000405019,0.000035628516,0.000034148095,0.0000011756615,0.00016722418,0.000022270646,0.010840256],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996174,0.00082143064,0.00037537224,0.00075859623,0.0013616596,0.0005089677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99602497,0.0015294931,0.000875902,0.0010880108,0.00029293186,0.0001887164],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010443982,0.00034461578,0.0012123247,0.00028399457,0.0011523762,0.000093020826,0.0047667488,0.0004213756,0.0017386049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020528311,0.000317236,0.00059533474,0.0027427198,0.0016879841,0.00052383385,0.0012736903,0.00067321607,0.000013688275],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018690925,0.00052123005,0.012891048,0.00011241671,0.0019388822,0.000028826173,0.9647025,0.0005250485,0.0004341717,0.004320503,0.011416846,0.001239461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008241847,0.00009301569,0.067599505,0.00044075638,0.0023084208,1.4410014e-7,0.88300014,0.00006932341,0.00007800896,0.0003365031,0.044696495,0.0005534939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29406726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36047497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08170233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004779331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005226308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991760764","doi":"","title":"The influence of Part G of the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 on the general principles of contract","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; McMaster University","keywords":"Consumer protection; Consumer Protection Act; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Data Protection Act 1998","score_opus":0.020684960523053117,"score_gpt":0.253671840226745,"score_spread":0.23298687970369186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991760764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95799184,0.000328716,0.000012433896,0.00027081798,0.0017613049,0.00074480154,0.000081544466,0.0000101775095,0.03879835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898177,0.0001301699,0.000047506834,0.0000022645368,0.00015371833,0.0000030236765,0.000004378844,0.000005933379,0.0098353205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776924,0.00039551032,0.00035135614,0.00020318503,0.0011225966,0.00015812412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962533,0.0004952381,0.0016926219,0.00045078248,0.0010630648,0.00004498889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065748073,0.0001445362,0.0003168654,0.000059602575,0.00097589777,0.000009287217,0.00086913526,0.0002801243,0.000029159512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009789747,0.00009353499,0.00024954154,0.00026416173,0.002691433,0.00021337655,0.00006582994,0.00026709263,0.000002040806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002814262,0.00052063883,0.026952969,0.0006538015,0.0011765553,0.00001011231,0.11789107,0.004804441,0.10834718,0.7349395,0.001083028,0.00080641755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017099314,0.000579938,0.30467635,0.0047756536,0.0008942202,0.0000048939196,0.026702417,0.000108047425,0.152962,0.0016513687,0.50513065,0.0008045379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058161835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010637926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73328817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019699402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017292758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9916698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6992701561","doi":"","title":"Market Conduct Regulation of the Retirement Fund Industry in South Africa","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Position (finance); Government (linguistics); Financial market; Financial services; Investment fund; Target date fund; Retirement age","score_opus":0.04078844407606409,"score_gpt":0.28251805328078045,"score_spread":0.24172960920471637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6992701561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4257079,0.0010753346,0.000007153085,0.00029426778,0.006906541,0.00055886665,0.000056360295,0.00004574638,0.5653478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8817725,0.000011921264,0.00017182711,0.000002120012,0.0002956401,0.0000013678176,0.000025845547,0.000010207655,0.117708564],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976686,0.0002907376,0.00027291084,0.00037601206,0.0011728934,0.00021881922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864125,0.000092822025,0.0004914867,0.00034987312,0.0003381589,0.00008642807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054124143,0.00017849467,0.00030260024,0.00018696589,0.0005890098,0.00003401454,0.00063502335,0.0011208274,0.00026903057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002303986,0.00019277824,0.00020198272,0.0007237906,0.0007856124,0.00028833133,0.00010198431,0.0010114727,0.000009553994],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051672175,0.00017099186,0.00967513,0.0007482449,0.00025777722,0.00007671419,0.8378345,0.00070215866,0.0025441623,0.13254125,0.01481335,0.00011903185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010155706,0.00010421698,0.08203274,0.0037405854,0.00068845745,0.0000023040534,0.27708495,0.00026469395,0.001657737,0.0044097165,0.62806165,0.00093737006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018261193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016143307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61324835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008831196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020477236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8644847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6993068654","doi":"","title":"Nova Scotia (Minister of Education &amp; Culture) v NSTU","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Appeal; Supreme court; Arbitration; Salary; Judgement; Geologist","score_opus":0.022438214142588803,"score_gpt":0.3180927186410187,"score_spread":0.2956545044984299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6993068654","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16799389,0.0013000518,0.000012310903,0.0008023204,0.0009579111,0.00026245718,0.000012881553,0.00008958198,0.8285686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87662905,0.0000406654,0.002810326,0.0010511192,0.0007520416,0.0000075547505,0.000013748784,0.000016072418,0.11867943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835503,0.0001742246,0.00031140322,0.00029151078,0.00051572453,0.00035210888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901074,0.000048588023,0.00010580892,0.00043143157,0.00016329842,0.0002401094],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039656137,0.00014080292,0.00020786852,0.00003651074,0.00024750404,0.00012254599,0.0004832088,0.00016794595,0.0152528025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017651184,0.00013375246,0.0001023792,0.00039925252,0.00048644244,0.00040214314,0.000035922905,0.00021866732,0.0069824215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001431846,0.0012720929,0.028373707,0.00013045667,0.00012234814,0.000007762372,0.2817463,0.00002873434,0.001403337,0.3999426,0.24743348,0.03939599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015263,0.000023964194,0.0006077005,0.000042048774,0.000019128012,7.1396823e-7,0.0011419171,2.9725774e-7,0.0002688269,0.0019068128,0.99566805,0.00016792055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011704746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01385916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74823457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011610705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032271547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996743127","doi":"","title":"Suspended/Prospecteddeclarations of invalidity: a comparative analysis of the Canadian, South African, and Italian judicial techniques","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Padua  Archive (University of Padua)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Jurisprudence; Constitutional court; Discretion; Judicial review; Constitutional review; Dialogic; Margin of appreciation","score_opus":0.09628143754195496,"score_gpt":0.3789679774660526,"score_spread":0.28268653992409765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996743127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20563647,0.00024891982,0.0037214009,0.00990868,0.000103515464,0.0022861846,0.0021673297,0.00006676573,0.7758607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956592,0.00003529936,0.002706357,0.000011944108,0.000015988391,0.0000017824774,0.000014960178,0.000003222231,0.0015512451],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699956,0.0012191536,0.00019554756,0.0002916784,0.00089298584,0.00040105724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99774885,0.00067078136,0.00017904905,0.00039631152,0.0008000371,0.00020494578],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014598508,0.000099360324,0.00043677498,0.0013745882,0.0013656816,0.00003345576,0.00083529414,0.00010015102,0.00013918335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061953906,0.000100714904,0.0001844927,0.0045254496,0.0047669816,0.00015363643,0.00041639275,0.00039826983,0.0000025681531],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112001195,0.00015334095,0.079057224,0.000066592635,0.0012086625,0.000012666312,0.53742373,0.000026451966,0.0030413726,0.37277743,0.0055630505,0.0005574649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009612442,0.00039330844,0.29739618,0.000371246,0.0015597991,3.5652286e-7,0.48470697,0.0025824062,0.0040300954,0.09725638,0.11018554,0.00055648305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40566295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86414313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79002273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024446278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017671897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998597474","doi":"","title":"Annual Report of the Town of Weymouth Containing the Reports of Selectmen, Town Treasurer, Town Accountant, Town Clerk, Assessors, and Other Officers and Committees for the Year Ending December 31, 1930","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"State Library's electronic repository (State Library of Massachusetts)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fogarty International Center; Ministry of Education, India","keywords":"Annual report; Year-ending; Small town; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.01257270448105904,"score_gpt":0.2558454238037035,"score_spread":0.24327271932264447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998597474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07591681,0.045297384,0.00005754486,0.0031738903,0.0017319517,0.005054706,0.002171795,0.00036738376,0.8662285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.568614,0.0023169552,0.00066982745,0.00021609775,0.00045549625,0.000107031236,0.00009386928,0.0004762115,0.42705047],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938106,0.00094531436,0.0019360835,0.0010013186,0.0012381681,0.0010685233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926073,0.0015674764,0.003923781,0.0015707931,0.00014880681,0.00018181803],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014416507,0.00072062714,0.001453678,0.00025278924,0.0005173618,0.00024112771,0.0013478169,0.00045662394,0.0006767438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025591982,0.00046737783,0.00047741126,0.0009345853,0.0020628427,0.0010939677,0.0006022972,0.00087466056,1.5443506e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001511216,0.00043602995,0.122817084,0.0010457278,0.0046902723,0.00027556668,0.08320588,0.00009032013,0.0016010649,0.0049986243,0.7769235,0.0024047538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008270005,0.00038091256,0.0015815195,0.00070915016,0.00048447374,0.00010945192,0.0068287845,0.00001962334,0.0067475834,0.001331096,0.9803759,0.0006045366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020793877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003041363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4926972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008875482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028058125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998642473","doi":"","title":"2006 Annual Reports Of The Town Officers Of The Town Of Sandwich (The Oldest Town On Cape Cod) For The Year Ending December 31, 2006","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"State Library's electronic repository (State Library of Massachusetts)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Australian Government; Strong","keywords":"Cape; Year-ending; Quarter (Canadian coin); Duration (music)","score_opus":0.0071046947785648506,"score_gpt":0.23856290888475082,"score_spread":0.23145821410618597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998642473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0116613945,0.006734774,0.000026203985,0.005085519,0.0028694328,0.0043679243,0.0026794754,0.00027053608,0.9663047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2475996,0.00095698494,0.00016341191,0.00020370551,0.0006577861,0.00010345153,0.00004916405,0.0004296309,0.74983627],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930564,0.001097522,0.0018558145,0.00092082476,0.001706958,0.001362466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916787,0.0015810939,0.003966694,0.0024787653,0.00012173719,0.00017297531],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009188347,0.0007677112,0.0011769129,0.00025980413,0.0006195171,0.00015491815,0.0034488798,0.00049320376,0.0016847773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017386522,0.00039448414,0.0009424544,0.0010528825,0.0026388953,0.0010806471,0.00067528966,0.0009446636,0.0000055966884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005045396,0.00018438805,0.005899369,0.00022135222,0.00082028046,0.000014187776,0.01144874,0.00010586005,0.00059980195,0.0035545414,0.97596717,0.0006797876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006567906,0.000291585,0.00063226244,0.00063709595,0.00028969077,0.00000850602,0.0011044075,0.000006815893,0.019315334,0.0023530696,0.97420204,0.0005023943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087706756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001372988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2359382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014091705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003239507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000640663","doi":"","title":"F. Venter, Constitutional Comparison. Japon, Germany, Canada and South Africa as Constitutional States","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Persée (Ministère de lEnseignement supérieur et de la Recherche)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutional law; Government (linguistics); Constitutional court; Constitutional right; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.06478157638346205,"score_gpt":0.35107716249646503,"score_spread":0.286295586113003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000640663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001327209,0.006835947,0.0011005793,0.0018110714,0.0005090263,0.00071231875,0.0010486961,0.00032489968,0.9863303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51495874,0.0013902256,0.009587406,0.0024779697,0.0008094265,0.0001814661,0.0003015334,0.00023563376,0.4700576],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993109,0.0031095494,0.0005778475,0.0008304028,0.0012748447,0.0010983658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99620014,0.002153686,0.0004129591,0.00043705408,0.0001583633,0.0006377733],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027452286,0.0006280855,0.00072033564,0.00027078175,0.0006117836,0.00034346915,0.00067214045,0.0012268075,0.0076281987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017989151,0.0006898967,0.0001628351,0.000386115,0.006337273,0.000110202905,0.00020310222,0.0015954403,0.00018218652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004052421,0.00018652258,0.0013380608,0.00009856544,0.00021370285,0.00033815223,0.36444023,0.000025460771,0.000009250413,0.06979118,0.5633547,0.00016366346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007575709,0.000057733174,0.000043088785,0.00022996974,0.00014948382,0.000038769744,0.016128223,0.000079776604,0.000007944247,0.0010087078,0.98078173,0.00071697537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36066523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24173854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51627266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027239607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009085171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000756694","doi":"","title":"Halifax Regional Municipality (Metro Transit) v Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Position (finance); Supreme court; Transit (satellite); Government (linguistics); Discipline","score_opus":0.04024225870852339,"score_gpt":0.29695247289819854,"score_spread":0.25671021418967516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000756694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7188915,0.0022349113,0.00085365225,0.0060815895,0.0010500043,0.00079977716,0.00011706,0.0010484565,0.26892304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988534,0.00017173911,0.0013847102,0.0013348276,0.0006611888,0.00003264972,0.000056681598,0.000046260142,0.0077779726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955707,0.0010778218,0.00054513616,0.00062003796,0.0012574078,0.00092888833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799037,0.0002162932,0.00014465541,0.0007102829,0.00024866793,0.0006897542],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013017089,0.00032504642,0.00047370163,0.00010613771,0.0016468057,0.0001321616,0.000929874,0.00040862654,0.0014857632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022995519,0.00033547234,0.00028874754,0.0010261233,0.001398968,0.0007351244,0.000051349467,0.0006789831,0.00079163513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047524346,0.0011676499,0.023331828,0.00011432583,0.00034294385,0.00065929245,0.25972703,0.0005067632,0.0019355409,0.67066664,0.03999993,0.0010728034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010497839,0.00009474641,0.0037563187,0.000050385646,0.000054750544,0.00000871932,0.0025622984,0.000053119315,0.000511711,0.0020890732,0.9892042,0.0005648702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059916835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024886591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94920427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032321326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003534602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009964305","doi":"","title":"Get Onsite Help and Support on all 1800 Microsoft 213-2171 Support that we sell..","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Microsoft Office Live Meeting; Phone; Microsoft excel; Distributed Component Object Model; Microsoft Office; Visual Basic for Applications","score_opus":0.0222033152421606,"score_gpt":0.30353024914083016,"score_spread":0.2813269338986696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009964305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034859433,0.000024021563,0.000106486536,0.0017341676,0.0013989576,0.0018283289,0.0003110657,0.0007275837,0.9935208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013793223,0.002004651,0.0009040316,0.0008069203,0.0008773983,0.00019612895,0.000062125335,0.00055419153,0.98080134],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911763,0.0012263801,0.00075534434,0.003911814,0.0014681043,0.0014620763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99286306,0.0007620273,0.00081584736,0.004518689,0.00014469896,0.00089567224],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005345057,0.0009385693,0.0011175035,0.0004658481,0.0004415637,0.00043945166,0.0025082408,0.0014304558,0.8431161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015894995,0.0009192538,0.0003880089,0.00023752957,0.0014317688,0.0003094209,0.0021090864,0.0010344129,0.88227993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009895621,0.00026354616,0.009949789,0.00016835965,0.00037142914,0.00017697945,0.027615255,0.0000015560358,0.00023502692,0.0033473603,0.9475367,0.010235006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006305668,0.000004313752,0.0003225381,0.00032102191,0.00014652818,0.000016784277,0.000506466,0.0000010869998,0.000710556,0.0017848273,0.99454,0.0010153231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017682515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012082651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04700325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055978546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007317327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010725451","doi":"","title":"Judicial discretion to exclude evidence in terms of s35(5) of the Constitution: S v Hena 2006 2 SACR 33 (SE)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Judicial discretion; Discretion; Section (typography); Fair trial; Admissible evidence","score_opus":0.04822013898818121,"score_gpt":0.2981487082366875,"score_spread":0.24992856924850626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010725451","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56827354,0.000087508444,0.0011183146,0.002858026,0.00033755536,0.0010057132,0.00015315972,0.000022306607,0.42614385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99098384,0.000088895125,0.0013501818,0.00004314459,0.00004465184,6.3454365e-8,0.000003006719,0.000004417635,0.0074817855],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981093,0.00029640296,0.00023166345,0.00034427855,0.00071336736,0.0003049902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982878,0.0001470565,0.00048449432,0.00049730716,0.000428069,0.0001552936],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070128,0.00014708599,0.0004911694,0.00020322882,0.00053061446,0.000018899402,0.0023240384,0.00017963357,0.0034602042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019368801,0.00016641815,0.00017209371,0.0010589398,0.003609998,0.001098804,0.00088613987,0.0001707319,0.000031350795],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0042476407,0.00092437473,0.07416567,0.00025289485,0.00031574542,0.000102335594,0.77427644,0.00040157852,0.008855532,0.09314842,0.028158475,0.015150879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0052727656,0.0014130317,0.109054916,0.002661695,0.00069133984,0.000004466587,0.26217192,0.000245388,0.0046538403,0.0029105584,0.60962266,0.0012974193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08115522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05298746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5814642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025280844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005548092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015254865","doi":"","title":"South African economy contracts marginally in third quarter","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Productivity; Work (physics); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.017701195793398197,"score_gpt":0.28531120107130387,"score_spread":0.2676100052779057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015254865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000079346955,0.00024220663,0.000020950562,0.001512482,0.0007190144,0.0004961318,0.000025981155,0.0011023063,0.995873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.062193524,0.000028537257,0.00030827787,0.00030426547,0.0009746969,0.000054898366,0.000003778137,0.00040069837,0.93573135],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981289,0.00017534419,0.00027760078,0.0004618185,0.0003151459,0.00064122194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906117,0.00017719327,0.00019055633,0.00035141688,0.000029586257,0.00019006753],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000599303,0.0002479694,0.00043680554,0.00034997423,0.00007819972,0.00015771334,0.00058508,0.00048662798,0.0071766493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018455622,0.00023426664,0.000103816456,0.000413977,0.00029608412,0.00010897618,0.00005985714,0.00035041853,0.0072317366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068821555,0.000029832137,0.0016045772,0.00001356994,0.00004000557,0.00006874641,0.0838377,5.485107e-7,8.9539654e-8,0.039546646,0.87451005,0.00034136264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020967177,0.000014405008,0.00014953697,0.00005808507,0.000011749686,7.729983e-8,0.009911458,0.0000020910963,2.2303396e-7,0.0008839872,0.98844945,0.00030926056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018612342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11010965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11393941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021298148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028599554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017281018","doi":"","title":"Analysing the Onus Issue in Dismissals Emanating from the Enforcement of Unilateral Changes to Conditions of Employment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Appeal; Enforcement; Unfair dismissal; Collective bargaining; Compliance (psychology); Industrial relations; Labour law","score_opus":0.38911105385662553,"score_gpt":0.5929458640894302,"score_spread":0.20383481023280464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017281018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9602831,0.0042140083,0.00008313223,0.0017659089,0.0004324441,0.0009294665,0.0001253261,0.000016211588,0.03215041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982018,0.0006333159,0.00021628944,0.00038634596,0.0001578693,0.00004203197,0.0000065905188,0.000018183711,0.000337588],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969033,0.0007180796,0.000851108,0.0002532573,0.0009226525,0.00035161545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99743783,0.0007079701,0.0009566308,0.0004725038,0.00027893015,0.00014611759],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025002623,0.00018288057,0.0005619425,0.00033807495,0.00042995298,0.00031918997,0.003062285,0.000068340625,0.013328648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056099624,0.00012068105,0.00013263927,0.0013524024,0.0004423518,0.00070925645,0.0007658941,0.00023752477,0.000007074593],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013157654,0.00038640448,0.5422725,0.000037179183,0.000532633,0.000019493511,0.42036268,0.00071171543,0.014193797,0.0047861654,0.009836078,0.0067297528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007993397,0.00005470652,0.77797127,0.0016078635,0.00045251875,7.8272933e-7,0.045843404,0.000121019344,0.0643892,0.027239496,0.080786996,0.0007334224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11434017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011780895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3745193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012747802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000113090486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9875733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018044156","doi":"","title":"CUPE, Local 805 v Prince Edward Island (Department of Health)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Process (computing); Trade union; Government (linguistics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.01317081162851128,"score_gpt":0.28975638754450955,"score_spread":0.27658557591599825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018044156","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15722112,0.009950764,0.004098231,0.007272245,0.001995036,0.0016045467,0.00018835785,0.00047755238,0.81719214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98929644,0.000042018462,0.0013921367,0.0005405506,0.000582629,0.000019352774,0.000017844084,0.000019869505,0.008089165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740785,0.0003424057,0.0005169408,0.00034589594,0.00076678337,0.0006201005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891466,0.00010792274,0.00022591921,0.0003910005,0.000114560484,0.00024592117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096589135,0.00016590126,0.00035117383,0.00004111142,0.00047138293,0.00007950507,0.00045496164,0.00012941404,0.0005783725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000103220744,0.00016000145,0.00010651378,0.00033570567,0.0006708829,0.00025611118,0.00010466234,0.00022629846,0.0005050157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079206104,0.00065393245,0.043677084,0.00014632699,0.000065954555,0.000044663982,0.016911874,0.00045518842,0.00007291918,0.85355973,0.07794955,0.006383583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035305688,0.00007601011,0.0020550068,0.000040662246,0.0000093108,6.2787853e-7,0.00058689417,0.00000824817,0.00044021595,0.004794325,0.99145085,0.00018478259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039793547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03768909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9135013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003035698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036357154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97987056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020307919","doi":"","title":"La FAAS 7  : voisiner le quotidien de Sudbury","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Érudit (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sample (material); Identification (biology); Context (archaeology); Consumption (sociology)","score_opus":0.009671650424505867,"score_gpt":0.20999221734288848,"score_spread":0.2003205669183826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020307919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37891704,0.09684067,0.00028199138,0.18510823,0.0020287998,0.00040383672,0.00013430028,0.0008876435,0.33539748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5174595,0.0048287655,0.00045119642,0.00021345622,0.00042149407,0.0000042947586,0.000013138765,0.00004221614,0.47656593],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969966,0.000633503,0.00019282286,0.00047817017,0.0005256309,0.0011732805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983848,0.00043237678,0.00014213314,0.00043000607,0.00010619531,0.0005045019],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010060755,0.0002741312,0.00032252664,0.00021651297,0.0013261731,0.00006294398,0.000778484,0.00051334704,0.000496033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020038926,0.00034547102,0.00025413782,0.0019542438,0.0008159488,0.0004596284,0.0005814759,0.00045888196,0.00379171],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006134977,0.0001294831,0.0030518419,0.00006021378,0.00016953277,0.007203851,0.122145385,0.00063126587,0.00018739373,0.27879316,0.5443368,0.04322977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005331419,0.00004558578,0.0014028013,0.00005498831,0.00011263248,0.000047057038,0.018268991,0.00071027345,0.000049709797,0.003868909,0.97453403,0.0003718535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10846694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11262903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4301973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008267239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035277865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7021243051","doi":"","title":"\"Nothing in this act shall preclude any better ideas\" : exploring the relationship between legislation and governance","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Legislation; Corporate governance; Government (linguistics); Information governance; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.06363732535008361,"score_gpt":0.3074937234178696,"score_spread":0.24385639806778603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7021243051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7756971,0.0007822304,2.3836171e-7,0.00029324827,0.00096880685,0.00079916307,0.00016195893,0.00018954746,0.22110769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817232,0.00034437145,0.00038633926,0.00019698705,0.00038963053,0.0002426539,0.00017005991,0.00013851997,0.016408255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942258,0.0011564995,0.0010054476,0.0010921404,0.0015331181,0.0009869881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99534386,0.0026273902,0.00082208554,0.0007052825,0.00022041792,0.00028095258],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003172656,0.0006188421,0.0006398376,0.00027791772,0.0028945848,0.0004027665,0.0010957844,0.0008650851,0.00021279341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006497437,0.0006014193,0.00021237583,0.0012538069,0.00020950065,0.0032316851,0.0001703658,0.0028292208,0.0001695033],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023627555,0.0001609967,0.3220983,0.0003872297,0.00024305943,0.00011768106,0.04258386,0.000053035892,0.00038520078,0.42716604,0.000033834236,0.20653446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006891836,0.00005272617,0.47749114,0.0011761927,0.00020904421,0.000002357182,0.002833792,0.000008696611,0.00044446133,0.082707845,0.4330911,0.0012934624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007987316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018378539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43305728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014518112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011654671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024391737","doi":"","title":"Rethinking Volks v Robinson: The implications of appliying a \"contextualised choice model\" to prospective South African domestic partnership legislation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boloka Institutional Repository (North-west University)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sine qua non; General partnership; Legislation; Duty; Limited partnership; Position (finance); Legislature","score_opus":0.06620193021246602,"score_gpt":0.2729531309105742,"score_spread":0.2067512006981082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024391737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46988022,0.00007198159,0.012388449,0.0003715064,0.00027715723,0.0012316164,0.000046622612,0.00023073773,0.5155017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99470943,0.0000032055048,0.0015866287,0.000072883544,0.00021580479,0.000021934216,0.000009938319,0.000012447823,0.0033677258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800354,0.00024137982,0.00032274303,0.0004878654,0.00055634463,0.00038810013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981895,0.00022134926,0.0003290586,0.00046391046,0.00055135874,0.00024483236],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002906248,0.00019949915,0.00022808254,0.00025599328,0.0024441702,0.00006588295,0.00086765416,0.00014528929,0.00001722432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004581329,0.0001924131,0.00013871006,0.001401787,0.001220653,0.00060247147,0.00017777363,0.00031831439,0.000024790696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013381866,0.0001283462,0.10899843,0.000012124493,0.00007211028,0.00003533658,0.2982605,0.008354375,0.00013738494,0.5836862,0.000057249646,0.00012411537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018745991,0.0003357277,0.77909994,0.00021699314,0.0006430524,0.000026826821,0.027972007,0.0013838015,0.0003684028,0.011662315,0.17484286,0.0015734609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027990036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038871965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6701015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007516331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012391323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027489545","doi":"","title":"Constitutional exclusion under s 35(5) of the Constitution : should an accused bear a ‘threshold burden’ of proving that his or her constitutional right has been infringed?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Charter; Constitution; Supreme court; Constitutional right; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional law","score_opus":0.09112931964103883,"score_gpt":0.2743497088664191,"score_spread":0.18322038922538025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027489545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61759716,0.0005524034,0.01707775,0.0011723203,0.006099671,0.0018740126,0.00030915817,0.00023556725,0.35508195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99491674,0.00002006579,0.003309164,0.000022488472,0.00031531544,0.0000026511648,0.000014630107,0.000006041005,0.001392921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968204,0.0002946346,0.00041844137,0.0004870559,0.001615198,0.00036430967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759793,0.00018218385,0.0007020833,0.0005207916,0.00075652485,0.00024047805],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000641487,0.00025749218,0.0004343175,0.00015856308,0.0025756902,0.000038918646,0.0010281681,0.00042544203,0.0005976444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002953594,0.00023749538,0.00026616134,0.0005507759,0.025073068,0.0014675602,0.0003705393,0.00039091328,0.000008252314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004996104,0.0003047561,0.017009752,0.0000743846,0.00015338615,0.000056650162,0.030488564,0.0021199738,0.004218447,0.94470745,0.00031824302,0.0000487567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012004147,0.0013103118,0.04421241,0.0044721668,0.0021965685,0.00034164297,0.092889115,0.0023839306,0.061466474,0.020834139,0.7542242,0.0036649122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064850454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010278942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92387336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071967335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005370077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029867574","doi":"","title":"Lessons on affirmative action: a comparative study in South Africa, Malaysia and Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Theses database, Tilburg University","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Public policy; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.11541254679514537,"score_gpt":0.36263418854808815,"score_spread":0.24722164175294278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029867574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7607183,0.0001314164,0.0000011224125,0.0001309197,0.00043434577,0.0007831049,0.0012467874,0.000045022756,0.23650898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9639311,0.0000434296,0.000022403708,0.000008056023,0.00008613165,0.000004265867,0.00034100018,0.000013496798,0.035550136],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754065,0.0006336846,0.00016577468,0.0005674388,0.00068930443,0.0004031704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827427,0.00039160176,0.00039021464,0.00058098114,0.00015812344,0.00020480808],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004010643,0.00030914822,0.00051857857,0.00023092328,0.001251161,0.000116274314,0.0008118087,0.00015783726,0.0002385736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021730331,0.00033769972,0.000046639823,0.00026673786,0.00029013207,0.0005335466,0.00012270697,0.0006252517,0.000037919388],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073581235,0.00033873116,0.010245217,0.000049727765,0.00016617338,0.0004655807,0.97934157,0.000014108708,0.0000039816346,0.004747333,0.0036210536,0.00027072418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005536024,0.00007946542,0.013266671,0.000187416,0.00012844309,1.5809036e-7,0.82650286,0.000011750481,0.000021410286,0.00003989884,0.15879567,0.00041265346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6914508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97584677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28439596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007016455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013975952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043418111","doi":"","title":"Socio-economic rights as constitutional human rights : Canada, India and South Africa","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Right to property; Government (linguistics); Constitution; Linguistic rights","score_opus":0.013658113396763483,"score_gpt":0.2738361110185248,"score_spread":0.2601779976217613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043418111","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013358826,0.00013396815,0.005460993,0.00025890995,0.0012124839,0.0051124236,0.0008693596,0.0005943654,0.98622394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25726652,0.000018281185,0.010673865,0.0005378735,0.00074601435,0.001324049,0.000997645,0.00012264181,0.72831315],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964154,0.0003167374,0.0007780162,0.00058600714,0.0010873307,0.00081654754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787116,0.00008356893,0.00080970896,0.0005843128,0.00020800288,0.0004432463],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021746291,0.00051321735,0.00053290685,0.0007434434,0.0023811343,0.0011126864,0.0010558495,0.00083816214,0.0020257642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000113198934,0.00051336444,0.00012324912,0.000415511,0.0029572689,0.0015995741,0.00024943362,0.00066859263,0.00049280643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035745259,0.000014168767,0.0000703633,0.00005533163,0.000025676583,0.000018235009,0.00879502,0.000011913554,0.0000042017523,0.4358811,0.5549724,0.00014801389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032022892,0.000010467519,0.000028700844,0.00031566017,0.000034593133,0.0000061167175,0.0002291168,0.000010179124,0.00017927815,0.0057992036,0.9923911,0.0006753511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6229726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73201287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4374187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018550894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052199797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7083692137","doi":"10.1002/aesr.202500258","title":"A Guideline to Evaluate Sorbent Performance for Atmospheric Water Harvesting","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sorbent; Guideline; Limiting; Moisture; Water quality; Certification; Water cycle","score_opus":0.0325014292133847,"score_gpt":0.4323894833573403,"score_spread":0.39988805414395556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7083692137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84850955,0.002044479,0.042508576,0.039121542,0.00053949305,0.002944392,0.000006956566,0.00028063857,0.064044386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.935233,0.00007850246,0.006862229,0.00029407075,0.00010083637,0.00053492223,0.0000047853287,0.000012045074,0.05687959],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99703604,0.00049630716,0.0003304238,0.00051539997,0.00054080994,0.0010810024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99651873,0.00059399515,0.000019881158,0.00036658562,0.0022808232,0.00022000809],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005984335,0.00012518668,0.00020164819,0.000060040213,0.0016647368,0.00013379382,0.00037299085,0.000099405035,0.000045726418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045272694,0.00010115813,0.000048237544,0.0007408491,0.0005570474,0.00031711283,0.00037080635,0.0001749525,0.0000035144772],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089493964,0.00016645102,0.0053624134,0.0004919895,0.000040608502,0.0000070176184,0.048271757,0.020993311,0.00032623348,0.1598713,0.0022340834,0.7613399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037058242,0.00016513499,0.00014431243,0.00002301453,0.000005654717,9.006449e-8,0.009606321,0.0040449803,0.0007023521,0.051678143,0.93312377,0.00013564514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024879607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010195856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93088967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071608025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006644713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095863645","doi":"","title":"FINANCIAL IMPACT","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject matter; Fence (mathematics); Subject (documents); Financial stability; Panel data; Financial compensation","score_opus":0.010282759079082831,"score_gpt":0.3625497519839267,"score_spread":0.35226699290484387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095863645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32905087,0.000010357096,0.000041615283,0.00050010934,0.0006667558,0.00005005254,0.0000012936342,0.00009088263,0.669588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836917,9.622752e-7,0.0012419035,0.00014391087,0.0007289269,0.0000022323661,3.0609064e-7,0.0000032183825,0.01418685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994704,0.000022011493,0.00005282755,0.00007914868,0.00017240776,0.00020317965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997104,0.000042698466,0.000014196685,0.00011402668,0.00003717428,0.00008154173],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026284813,0.000037819816,0.000048208567,0.000018399578,0.0002055089,0.000050856386,0.00018949568,0.00007760033,0.0068983226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068696967,0.000029269557,0.000044524477,0.00014608305,0.00017050249,0.00011973024,0.000021298305,0.00014810564,0.0008647054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064838155,0.000040918985,0.025811087,8.274316e-7,0.0000038396392,0.0000069501134,0.07696889,5.813339e-7,0.001128028,0.83927894,0.04337818,0.0133753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050718107,0.000010032375,0.005808542,3.8099213e-7,0.0000015237707,1.3124163e-7,0.0002032686,0.0000031320203,0.00012782268,0.0074373363,0.9862921,0.00006497643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034754404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042545735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94291395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018153509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001797392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097280216","doi":"","title":"Whether the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act supports the decision of Service Nova Scotia and Municipal Relations to disclose a Pre- Employment Reference Check.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of information; Personally identifiable information; Third party; Nova scotia; Service (business); Data Protection Act 1998; Information privacy","score_opus":0.02514901245633055,"score_gpt":0.3070245886306119,"score_spread":0.28187557617428133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097280216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9878363,0.00003389815,0.00083236705,0.001337921,0.00004147605,0.0011930066,0.000008427787,0.000011602937,0.008705004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985502,0.0000031757145,0.001153499,0.000025064193,0.000016634383,0.0000149124935,0.0000016005009,0.0000033964873,0.0002315418],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891204,0.0001269029,0.00037817494,0.00008989671,0.00038863067,0.00010438615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990961,0.00016112358,0.00023842943,0.00027971622,0.00019423939,0.000030371984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000832215,0.00006812798,0.000112937465,0.00005468521,0.0001469311,0.00003607075,0.0002141872,0.00005704068,0.00008523401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025304008,0.00003796099,0.000017849297,0.00042265965,0.00018691598,0.00041961696,0.00015742166,0.00008586049,0.0000036966378],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022594692,0.00024979026,0.10157212,0.000050063863,0.000033678054,1.2577337e-7,0.8742419,0.00092066464,0.00118714,0.014817981,0.0002763865,0.006424236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007446515,0.00042760096,0.93496686,0.00015145446,0.00008769893,0.0000010005908,0.03983292,0.0008719452,0.0013665883,0.0058161244,0.015540548,0.00019258996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.117751434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05994229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83440894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025075014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006184688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9572113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7112446418","doi":"","title":"Remedies for Unreasonable Administrative Action after Vavilov","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Remedial education; Administrative law; Action (physics); Invocation; Core (optical fiber); Supreme court; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.039322525820764224,"score_gpt":0.3537405037262486,"score_spread":0.31441797790548437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7112446418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036000594,0.020513654,0.002147616,0.016620988,0.016099937,0.0047716107,0.0005661672,0.00053647417,0.902743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8486809,0.00029173394,0.0023319712,0.0015596207,0.0016594732,0.0006920383,0.000017572944,0.00004041355,0.14472626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954367,0.0004992453,0.00080865656,0.0011099015,0.0008451365,0.0013003051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99684227,0.00086934963,0.0003332984,0.00075011846,0.0006590805,0.0005458837],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012862693,0.00054915075,0.00069796044,0.00013210297,0.0017838815,0.0007911836,0.00085402094,0.00064649124,0.0029267548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017937445,0.0005764037,0.00043553338,0.0011700126,0.001649193,0.0012942464,0.0002532419,0.0007279961,0.00086043077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023705338,0.00076402153,0.0058214986,0.00080003246,0.0007273459,0.000056821973,0.062750846,0.000014025686,0.0003616694,0.8494035,0.07105352,0.0058761854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009404438,0.0002941535,0.0005626502,0.00039713076,0.00028232252,5.816894e-7,0.012564037,0.000043232496,0.002467036,0.028392712,0.9534791,0.00057657686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003238691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013252957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8824256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000793738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012996686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7112651132","doi":"","title":"Ghana’s official creditors are scheduled to meet on Monday to discuss restructuring some $5.4 billion in loans to the country","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - Andrews University (Andrews University)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Creditor; Debt; Debt restructuring; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.015937274343449978,"score_gpt":0.2412574166559579,"score_spread":0.2253201423125079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7112651132","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85582805,0.00024838513,0.0005020867,0.024565613,0.0063524,0.002610773,0.0030628021,0.0004928714,0.106337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809358,0.00008077891,0.000057439414,0.00038981627,0.0014589338,0.0000011020838,0.00004041961,0.00007238535,0.016963292],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937635,0.0006437603,0.0005456129,0.0018106587,0.0015285984,0.0017078385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996214,0.00060159195,0.00020713927,0.0011276382,0.00024610566,0.0016035545],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006059319,0.0008880397,0.0009622249,0.003327411,0.0022194835,0.0015668417,0.003417897,0.00064266747,0.00011823574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044084768,0.00087032217,0.0004910715,0.010295178,0.00074070675,0.0030027113,0.0022279788,0.00120657,0.0007320321],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007665417,0.0016870347,0.013953824,0.00037148874,0.0009912814,0.011525924,0.5559719,0.023740318,0.00015079425,0.2619334,0.11319262,0.00881595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085929,0.00057239557,0.0011200844,0.00082275283,0.00016749826,0.0000031207367,0.07633394,0.0001837423,0.00009246125,0.00019831768,0.91847706,0.0011693205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029675066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022343127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80528444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003267076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083914906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7113059450","doi":"","title":"The Section 32(1) Analysis: Clarifying Eldridge in Light of York Region District School Board","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Charter; Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisprudence; High Court; George (robot)","score_opus":0.01629377792440269,"score_gpt":0.28440729282094773,"score_spread":0.26811351489654506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7113059450","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21457416,0.059469484,0.0023181948,0.013552915,0.011596642,0.003047941,0.00006218627,0.0004170042,0.6949615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98000187,0.0016930508,0.00016159508,0.00040352638,0.0010054408,0.000101982136,0.0000097508055,0.000032282867,0.01659048],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99265254,0.0018342956,0.0017596474,0.0011450913,0.0013460723,0.0012623448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958203,0.0008263223,0.0008749067,0.0016117614,0.00038336564,0.00048338767],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027584184,0.00054676156,0.001058977,0.000642074,0.0022178253,0.00092193624,0.0018938314,0.00095341634,0.00027025992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019031308,0.00047581416,0.0008394086,0.012601873,0.0010075048,0.00082507706,0.0004567314,0.0021420757,0.00018564805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011599011,0.0011461558,0.44742268,0.00056357787,0.0043003154,0.00011362186,0.07695813,0.002192971,0.0004939012,0.4223996,0.036140658,0.0071084686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009660136,0.00012016612,0.017958215,0.00048131534,0.0014029813,6.184496e-7,0.012344528,0.00046119088,0.0006724106,0.003304655,0.9616442,0.0006437516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040120617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05191661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9255035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012406664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000760131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7113509527","doi":"","title":"Reconceptualising the Judicial Role in the Allocation of Healthcare Resources: Lessons from Canada and South Africa?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bristol Research (University of Bristol)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Legislation; Legislature; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.08017680478293579,"score_gpt":0.33482053193705474,"score_spread":0.254643727154119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7113509527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9376048,0.003593941,0.000031807605,0.041685738,0.00004459509,0.00040878245,0.00012254379,0.000012652953,0.016495157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990722,0.00008039634,0.00021919182,0.00006174159,0.000112056296,7.974432e-7,0.0000054380394,0.0000060836537,0.0004421269],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963685,0.00158844,0.0001759129,0.0002586262,0.0012191924,0.00038929464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982102,0.00084002194,0.00016723051,0.00034341664,0.00032186878,0.00011725473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025535559,0.00007614144,0.00020059626,0.00011844538,0.0010688464,0.000040017858,0.0010300856,0.00009633707,0.000050065722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061396335,0.00007076546,0.000041998395,0.0008216862,0.0016808329,0.00018730563,0.0001763386,0.0004499528,0.0000044801936],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000714558,0.000039290764,0.004578576,0.00001218704,0.000013981161,0.000011978864,0.975072,0.000018878049,0.00003598653,0.0037761629,0.0038724113,0.012497072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024182248,0.000033483117,0.012826433,0.00004855085,0.000011295981,3.055835e-7,0.6354763,0.000112362635,0.000011004,0.00091709214,0.35023612,0.00008521561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9788812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98457843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3463637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005241937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011458627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8220811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W71173951","doi":"","title":"Parole boards in South Africa: on the road to extinction? A comparative perspective","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Privilege (computing); Prison; Perspective (graphical); Law; Criminology; Public administration; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.08221764025382884,"score_gpt":0.3528631016499546,"score_spread":0.2706454613961258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W71173951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15261807,0.0013756063,0.00026316382,0.0026323653,0.00047676417,0.00033922165,0.000056378096,0.000015700212,0.84222275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99590236,0.000008459336,0.0002969839,0.0002199642,0.00026901055,0.000018878167,4.4528423e-7,0.000009501105,0.0032743884],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755186,0.0007092808,0.0004624154,0.00025009754,0.0007218049,0.00030455887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808806,0.00043541228,0.00035803515,0.00013719795,0.00078447274,0.0001968107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011536719,0.00019889425,0.00038073238,0.00019242054,0.000477511,0.00018895259,0.0005035372,0.00006879363,0.000523442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003999424,0.00013766447,0.00012528083,0.0004287023,0.00049831177,0.00023333766,0.000053133608,0.0004612327,0.0002415945],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017896593,0.00014086001,0.00048629008,5.5220113e-7,0.0000911149,0.0000070619076,0.6394912,0.0001466384,0.000028363202,0.35854617,0.0008519489,0.00003082417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061488926,0.00028978928,0.00036394145,0.000061520484,0.000021025022,0.0000035981345,0.5137794,0.00005187901,0.000116781644,0.020059511,0.46443418,0.00020345011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019643654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000518633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8432843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035884438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012146738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5731323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124602040","doi":"10.17159/pjdnzz54","title":"Criminal Justice for Female Victims of Domestic Violence: Time to Deal Defencelessness a Final Blow","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Domestic violence; Legislature; Plea; Notice; Legislation; Law enforcement; Presidential system","score_opus":0.025197674508300676,"score_gpt":0.3496766400808022,"score_spread":0.3244789655725015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124602040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90325963,0.002256761,0.009060608,0.0011319482,0.002670275,0.0026457228,0.00031798898,0.000113032125,0.07854403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708477,0.000034253364,0.009692929,0.00077086204,0.00057609315,0.00020853976,0.000007522455,0.000031233736,0.017830815],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961856,0.00025916143,0.0008355785,0.00086203986,0.00075698685,0.0011006525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968882,0.0012284525,0.00027875497,0.0005382855,0.00071529334,0.00035100657],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010472062,0.00041839166,0.0007581242,0.00029972263,0.00071466435,0.00021530349,0.0012362065,0.0003741406,0.0034155461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007680627,0.00042834133,0.0003183658,0.0015720197,0.0008221053,0.0002946914,0.00035243446,0.00031294004,0.001058955],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003456133,0.0021246343,0.0049399654,0.008923991,0.0005243512,0.00014364149,0.74468267,0.0008939289,0.00360731,0.031894393,0.009365938,0.18944307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007810007,0.0038936061,0.006216111,0.012485193,0.013939524,0.000017592547,0.09615028,0.010031137,0.009652147,0.014177553,0.8211317,0.0044951686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021726222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045747114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81176573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025932313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089601916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7126242126","doi":"10.64449/9781997468912","title":"Landmark Constitutional Cases that Changed South Africa: Volume 2","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book","venue":"UJ Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Dalhousie University; National Research Foundation; Universidade do Minho; University of Pittsburgh","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Constitutional law; Legislation; Constitution; Constitutional court; Constitutional review; High Court; Common law; Bill of rights; Human rights","score_opus":0.08881075822393716,"score_gpt":0.2997735386261752,"score_spread":0.210962780402238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7126242126","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000026908589,0.008377996,0.0003538303,0.0001475868,0.0058050742,0.0021871799,0.0029401607,0.00040187134,0.9797594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2692856,0.00010213043,0.00020528381,0.00019709056,0.0024838033,0.00030895995,0.000106889805,0.00005065633,0.7272596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918512,0.0009764333,0.0010736462,0.001808677,0.0024126794,0.0018773655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99506366,0.0012636916,0.0010129088,0.0013235839,0.00060032663,0.0007358557],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012011229,0.0012517254,0.0016045871,0.00039914393,0.0024141874,0.0008372283,0.0023223169,0.0018204487,0.0016614939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010521876,0.0012895523,0.00078345306,0.00013374782,0.010063152,0.00026895636,0.0013183837,0.001747991,0.00053520745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002363664,0.0001366913,0.00048368186,0.00061069673,0.0008678308,0.00066190306,0.3177134,0.00001283188,0.0000026272442,0.56279576,0.11453159,0.0019466223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079122715,0.00010010775,0.000015920097,0.00089176063,0.00073749805,0.000008181762,0.0019355284,0.00003508599,0.000034056346,0.002138986,0.99200577,0.0013059053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013632477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022862549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8774741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008756058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004280821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133032279","doi":"","title":"Gender stereotypes in South African law: Hugo and beyond","year":2003,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec; Bibliographical Society of Canada; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Stereotype (UML); Stereotype threat; Natural (archaeology); Gender equality; Term (time); Racism","score_opus":0.02871949108432492,"score_gpt":0.35004913462427556,"score_spread":0.32132964353995064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133032279","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20648418,0.008273643,0.000014814431,0.0002835645,0.0014761821,0.0007983149,0.000018021969,0.00006210535,0.7825892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.913063,0.00020541911,0.00073767366,0.00030102392,0.00023337263,0.000048107708,0.000039327788,0.00007968287,0.08529243],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954042,0.000715065,0.0006337052,0.0011414477,0.0009978042,0.0011078196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980818,0.00024075383,0.0005094396,0.0005350121,0.0001976931,0.00043530238],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094220444,0.00066053355,0.0008391837,0.00028492013,0.00067614875,0.00041189624,0.0005900771,0.00086919335,0.0013392657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031548413,0.0007141627,0.00015190365,0.001108996,0.00083286327,0.0003061956,0.00009619998,0.00094230863,0.00030825782],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074584364,0.00008202511,0.0017003168,0.0001275079,0.00005412897,0.000029493955,0.95517224,0.000005457941,0.00004485856,0.04211549,0.00017199854,0.0004219008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071374065,0.00011076903,0.0011361599,0.00010210855,0.00016714979,0.0000010041297,0.8203098,0.000021425469,0.0001473129,0.0032418463,0.17297645,0.0010722255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005431289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075356807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7065788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023058619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046543076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7147116020","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v30i2.2915","title":"Revisiting the judicial role in the allocation of healthcare resources: on deference, democratic dialogue and deliberation","year":2005,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Deliberation; Argument (complex analysis); Health care; Deliberative democracy; Judicial review; Function (biology); Value (mathematics)","score_opus":0.028953187304734385,"score_gpt":0.34485750977645174,"score_spread":0.31590432247171735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7147116020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8404209,0.0046833633,0.00065216667,0.14482984,0.0008063396,0.001333023,0.00001584287,0.000013786321,0.007244764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99424773,0.0005290417,0.0005932311,0.001699189,0.002851074,0.000021996602,7.866334e-7,0.000008608333,0.000048337315],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99467105,0.0010507893,0.0010241931,0.00042071327,0.00207721,0.00075601845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99657106,0.0017025406,0.00071068195,0.00027725054,0.00044509425,0.00029336885],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014430342,0.00019372937,0.00031017466,0.00018402447,0.004213507,0.0007639553,0.0014675669,0.00015712346,0.000018781688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049576256,0.0001119012,0.0001183596,0.0018288502,0.002552282,0.00079750776,0.00011036037,0.00088674674,0.000006960363],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024488918,0.00020578079,0.002774253,0.00007681208,0.000014602131,0.000004722747,0.460911,0.0008923098,0.0006444992,0.1576194,0.00042806295,0.37618366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004111279,0.0044849687,0.089143075,0.0040168045,0.0004511758,0.00016316278,0.13396844,0.0765381,0.0015327856,0.2745681,0.4090304,0.0019916883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004485213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008583584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40860236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034423784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010252482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7147256335","doi":"10.38140/jjs.v32i2.2944","title":"Gronde vir die weiering van toegang tot inligting soos van toepassing op openbare instellings (deel I)","year":2007,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Juridical Science","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Appeal; Freedom of information; Promotion (chess); Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory law","score_opus":0.03694009050939181,"score_gpt":0.37725761096028226,"score_spread":0.3403175204508905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7147256335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7392057,0.006700093,0.087206766,0.0071000145,0.022566684,0.0025298982,0.000045732977,0.00034727133,0.1342978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97393876,0.00037632784,0.016335648,0.00077161775,0.006081738,0.000012106702,0.000001395646,0.00008821212,0.0023941768],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856891,0.0002856835,0.0024711532,0.0016688235,0.005156644,0.0047286055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99161094,0.0014220701,0.0015255095,0.0006908732,0.0010973073,0.0036532998],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02234779,0.0008112666,0.001043761,0.0007436384,0.014801261,0.005149707,0.004972332,0.0006070331,0.00064544246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077709514,0.00074688246,0.00073330855,0.0038968055,0.005452647,0.0059623597,0.0013685698,0.0026521427,0.00019902029],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00095762534,0.0013797985,0.005777076,0.0004140923,0.00021662416,0.0011312882,0.3160591,0.0019521171,0.03454825,0.031239593,0.0018743183,0.6044501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025864032,0.001202351,0.0017855859,0.0019508686,0.00029994227,0.00021929528,0.034897823,0.010907498,0.018752415,0.024023874,0.9003451,0.0030288752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033824894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024914864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89847076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028766987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031932862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161945555","doi":"10.82308/5331","title":"The Structure of Invalid but Operative Legislation: Why the Notwithstanding Clause Does Not Preclude Judicial Review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Constitution; Judicial opinion; Doctrine; Legislation; Interpretation (philosophy); Dormant Commerce Clause; Judicial activism","score_opus":0.028533301615737156,"score_gpt":0.3709455877957895,"score_spread":0.34241228618005237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161945555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014913022,0.11963491,0.00005004509,0.030939989,0.01816991,0.006499797,0.0005903535,0.00034950653,0.8088525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8924627,0.014174026,0.00015154842,0.001174527,0.0019375694,0.000047666657,0.00013721905,0.00005482081,0.08985995],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967319,0.0006328888,0.0006401615,0.0004053599,0.0012528877,0.00033684235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776834,0.00079098355,0.00041877365,0.00045890984,0.00049182685,0.00007114893],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011345374,0.00030070145,0.00046724462,0.000055915552,0.0013895495,0.00047941157,0.0010337854,0.00033116338,0.0008799014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014948543,0.00013018743,0.00020507134,0.000649886,0.0004865585,0.00026350014,0.000080613674,0.00077436236,0.000037495884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011867318,0.00001739118,0.000059599955,0.0010859204,0.00037704967,0.0000070659744,0.68730193,0.000007867126,0.0008417088,0.26082176,0.045251057,0.0041100103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011736375,0.00004693043,0.000049527618,0.00320851,0.00058866554,4.977992e-7,0.07659515,0.0000126903815,0.0060780006,0.011528246,0.90131706,0.00045735238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034833404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.063291036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87754965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017599197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006540823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161974366","doi":"10.82308/50485","title":"Advancing the right to education for First Nations children: Lessons in administrative dialogue from the South African constitutional experience","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Charter; Fundamental rights; Human rights education; International human rights law; Democracy; Enforcement; Constitution","score_opus":0.026413952327486428,"score_gpt":0.3720208486128775,"score_spread":0.34560689628539104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161974366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08182918,0.00070415274,0.0036504765,0.022554195,0.007502501,0.008152265,0.0023097047,0.00018160806,0.8731159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896679,0.000012997639,0.001638271,0.00033117045,0.0014037549,0.001716618,0.0008709967,0.000013982262,0.0043443157],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810594,0.00017277796,0.00035730508,0.00048361404,0.0005035206,0.0003768097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974643,0.0014479464,0.00024194336,0.00033085994,0.00038939138,0.00012558102],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044112193,0.00022363396,0.00021654637,0.00011036054,0.0029888856,0.00024253354,0.0009151722,0.00019898721,0.00036886317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003833101,0.0001451315,0.00010331016,0.00075811654,0.001033835,0.00021729717,0.00003573894,0.00023988137,0.000088526496],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030001811,0.00007538023,0.0008776779,0.0000036385868,0.000017045691,1.3458413e-7,0.6661516,0.00000715415,0.0000023868129,0.3280523,0.0045527597,0.00022995331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021751912,0.000052626776,0.008765382,0.0003039005,0.00006948802,2.7781834e-7,0.4797549,0.0000090345275,0.00018932206,0.009906512,0.5002336,0.00049743685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006713078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47849616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9078387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003354818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029633695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W71771385","doi":"","title":"Indemnity costs - whether indemnity costs can be ordered in Magistrates Court","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proctor/˜The œproctor","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indemnity; Appeal; Honour; Loan; Law; Business; Actuarial science; Political science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.03135639991169576,"score_gpt":0.3295403591522502,"score_spread":0.29818395924055446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W71771385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84490466,0.0021565903,0.000055133256,0.027080622,0.001133771,0.0033400226,0.00021608961,0.00069949933,0.1204136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98804504,0.00006324931,0.0005626929,0.0019076478,0.001149325,0.00026881506,0.0000195209,0.00007501072,0.007908713],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99488777,0.0007982176,0.0007538848,0.00080783304,0.001377489,0.001374783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99744576,0.0005057741,0.00037018757,0.0007344756,0.00045114162,0.0004926403],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002239929,0.00050804124,0.0005532479,0.00017754706,0.0009689229,0.00043202945,0.0016126703,0.0005153364,0.0012435388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015272349,0.00042051196,0.00015142928,0.0012674408,0.0012945589,0.00063097954,0.00027081615,0.001216051,0.00038974162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054863066,0.0022696767,0.49536607,0.00018221312,0.00026581253,0.00007849984,0.398314,0.000062557454,0.0018531265,0.019348988,0.03455945,0.047151007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013869796,0.00011784327,0.017741833,0.000097078024,0.000057076828,0.000004279502,0.007686374,0.00016280793,0.00091761927,0.0016024833,0.9692741,0.0009514936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018377626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11669766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9347147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019240857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010591431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W72655083","doi":"","title":"Practice and procedure - District Court Act 1967 s79 - transfer of proceeding pending in Magistrates Court to District Court","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Discretion; Remand (court procedure); High Court; Political science; Court of equity; Court of record; Original jurisdiction; Jurisdiction; Supreme court","score_opus":0.01169614851392166,"score_gpt":0.26447828529699724,"score_spread":0.2527821367830756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W72655083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96502453,0.00011652599,0.0009456739,0.011877347,0.00006054303,0.0005714918,0.000050603525,0.00012785014,0.021225464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996162,0.00018828294,0.0034133368,0.000015243031,0.000021398242,0.0000013717612,0.0000037915524,0.000010881964,0.00018368199],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849963,0.00003966395,0.00025334745,0.00042866686,0.00037519014,0.0004035244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991655,0.00010571167,0.00015494633,0.00021413177,0.00022260024,0.0001371281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004906522,0.00018289438,0.00037410247,0.000437218,0.00027099127,0.000027983006,0.0006078008,0.0002994015,0.000062687825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000726547,0.00020483,0.000057937978,0.0011665503,0.0007824785,0.00039892297,0.00016257931,0.00039836054,0.0000125905235],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005601393,0.00085373496,0.8223805,0.0003604878,0.0002036262,0.00032120018,0.07630021,0.00012127312,0.002655403,0.09058421,0.00077623094,0.0048830113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008794716,0.001122781,0.3820723,0.001743818,0.000713292,0.00006863337,0.3241504,0.00007697156,0.012456202,0.014595281,0.2519569,0.0022486853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002889829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00093058834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44030818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026358064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003412991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8352725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W72796938","doi":"10.29173/alr102","title":"&lt;i&gt;Progressive Homes Ltd. v. Lombard General Insurance Co. of Canada&lt;/i&gt;","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Duty; Law; Workmanship; Liability; Insurance policy; Liability insurance; Political science; Business; Economics; Operations management","score_opus":0.011746203514436651,"score_gpt":0.28126348985878635,"score_spread":0.2695172863443497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W72796938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026416996,0.38697767,0.0000013536628,0.0062840367,0.0006108454,0.0014155016,0.000036110752,0.000041943822,0.57821554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94939774,0.023294298,0.0003561549,0.003485593,0.0003403758,0.00020039351,0.00001773929,0.000038620892,0.022869065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99692994,0.00043972037,0.000635493,0.00041135072,0.00087364,0.0007098702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779516,0.00041571443,0.00041164007,0.0006368659,0.00038445584,0.00035614404],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004765704,0.00027324472,0.0007890702,0.000024234194,0.0003685115,0.000070597336,0.0008844495,0.00012595612,0.0031305912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008346742,0.00023052063,0.00018474067,0.0005089372,0.00072845473,0.00038393482,0.00010172975,0.00013301165,0.00039781822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074503523,0.00012550749,0.0038536133,0.0020846215,0.0001985482,0.000033879143,0.009461223,0.0000032038893,0.00033888678,0.564784,0.40780848,0.011300592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013442323,0.000024061444,0.0010875423,0.0010232424,0.000039549253,0.0000018347,0.000023967634,0.0000018969231,0.00011389447,0.00032025078,0.99693704,0.00029232202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49789304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67732334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9229808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019485017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007639388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W74706850","doi":"","title":"Land use permits and water licences: improving enforcement of terms and conditions in the NWT","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada","keywords":"Enforcement; Business; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Geography; Environmental science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.021865758497316205,"score_gpt":0.25110752590460494,"score_spread":0.22924176740728874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W74706850","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97465235,0.00007747805,0.000008495114,0.00016890098,0.000063332656,0.00016624585,0.00001901583,0.000012790529,0.024831392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99847335,0.000051177252,0.00005029889,0.00006391148,0.000040261064,6.7412645e-7,0.000005934924,0.0000030998904,0.0013112666],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999277,0.00012954162,0.00007817615,0.00011129534,0.00015958096,0.00024443492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962133,0.00012659625,0.000036776113,0.00010655085,0.000026173551,0.000082543804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026840184,0.00006731343,0.00008945503,0.00011102325,0.0002606712,0.00004602121,0.00016818689,0.00006019078,0.00012610182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038358674,0.000048454473,0.000019913974,0.00019248114,0.00035271235,0.0007172051,0.00008432881,0.000090448586,0.0000049366054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007995756,0.000028463426,0.9670183,0.000010062801,0.0000067254578,0.0000073268575,0.024866005,0.0000016132246,0.000009701861,0.007679722,0.00016272036,0.0002013819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007621722,0.00006432007,0.027201487,0.000037315993,0.00007441249,1.0650476e-8,0.28486896,0.000024379044,0.00049638445,0.00023771336,0.68599504,0.0002378231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049004573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039355643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9398168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039935545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016995291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9781736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W759495011","doi":"","title":"Changing House: The Law Affecting A Move Between Elected Offices","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Jurisdiction; Legislature; Law; Politics; Business; House of Representatives; Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.05732839688503895,"score_gpt":0.32578342572180186,"score_spread":0.2684550288367629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W759495011","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031970184,0.605577,0.000025755096,0.04737297,0.0016988445,0.004312435,0.0001367498,0.00064561924,0.30826044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978754,0.0028931163,0.00013132535,0.016333362,0.001072464,0.000058471815,0.000019057257,0.00004244945,0.00069576234],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997699,0.0005469247,0.00025641546,0.00026167883,0.00041142857,0.0008245311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983885,0.0001869759,0.00012409558,0.00034674114,0.000095314535,0.0008583671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019111076,0.00016478632,0.0003166347,0.000074720745,0.00081259315,0.00013769085,0.00062334444,0.00006854802,0.00025859036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036508727,0.000130876,0.00008967605,0.0009855788,0.00026420775,0.00025442525,0.000050031744,0.000251021,0.0004529621],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009389431,0.000047458074,0.033646517,0.0013076105,0.0005101851,0.0002454819,0.40790436,0.000008831267,0.0000045840256,0.02456362,0.35877296,0.17297898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082501625,0.000018426394,0.000090833724,0.0006587448,0.00009663583,0.0000011757958,0.0074997563,0.0000015017505,0.0000070380024,0.00014558552,0.9912147,0.00018310315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5371904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65880513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9467838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008509343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008307876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6249892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W77652136","doi":"","title":"Personal Injuries Proceedings Act 2002 s 27(1) – duty of respondent to give information and documents","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proctor/˜The œproctor","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Respondent; Law; Scope (computer science); Duty; Legislature; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Legislative history; Computer science","score_opus":0.01127528389158153,"score_gpt":0.3029806081498711,"score_spread":0.29170532425828954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W77652136","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9363057,0.00064798177,0.000041148232,0.0063005514,0.00046905802,0.0019578598,0.000051142506,0.000191034,0.054035503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98988307,0.000036795373,0.00070663774,0.00068770564,0.00028717256,0.00005922501,0.000002780981,0.000011036387,0.008325597],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771017,0.00005981426,0.00044615992,0.00027200024,0.0010173178,0.0004945341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987385,0.00008512434,0.00029191747,0.00014960667,0.00048179532,0.00025304194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008769688,0.00021985173,0.00026480807,0.0001694865,0.00050152076,0.0003363172,0.00053513004,0.0001437558,0.00025324692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008855976,0.00016923007,0.00007109598,0.00064023054,0.00035359172,0.0015908154,0.00013442645,0.00022208005,0.00018113814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006770512,0.00013909944,0.017370293,0.0001211914,0.0000544988,0.0000011563012,0.93147695,9.545037e-7,0.001244851,0.011416716,0.024006495,0.0134907635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048513818,0.000444157,0.017946193,0.000087020075,0.00004427719,0.0000014621475,0.014198762,0.000025741483,0.0015924587,0.0013833035,0.9634168,0.00037465873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002960147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056943052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9394103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020392027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002097942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6901002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7808746","doi":"10.5553/arbac/.000007","title":"Het incorporatiebeding: verleden, heden en toekomst","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academie voor arbeidsrecht","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Trade union; Order (exchange); Quarter (Canadian coin); Character (mathematics); Labour law; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology; Business; Labour economics; Economics; Linguistics; History; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.032996095817226886,"score_gpt":0.3754511805984044,"score_spread":0.3424550847811775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7808746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13821276,0.0057612145,0.00038461265,0.010186277,0.0053914026,0.0010623812,0.000040958595,0.0011691803,0.8377912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790295,0.00017652525,0.0021058144,0.0011177881,0.004932683,0.000059659113,0.000010897163,0.000054102256,0.012513029],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963241,0.00051582075,0.0004743593,0.00040439324,0.001018157,0.0012631636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997967,0.0005990526,0.00021558584,0.0004031159,0.000104851315,0.000710391],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026016496,0.0002959617,0.0003669726,0.0001588835,0.0006600291,0.0001180534,0.0010868807,0.000765751,0.0012235453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018138859,0.00029058367,0.0001445622,0.000841827,0.0004730868,0.0013776558,0.00031034063,0.0010175944,0.0025332996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006036534,0.00026991375,0.22410138,0.000043907883,0.00015673507,0.000019999563,0.37218487,0.000008775188,0.0014932837,0.25930008,0.12814218,0.01421851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024632984,0.000033539647,0.002071163,0.000026096723,0.000049863098,0.0000022308686,0.0038579495,0.000010940178,0.0013049315,0.0032594737,0.9887129,0.00042459945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007677939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000086115084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86057067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047018685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019204352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W806317943","doi":"","title":"The Battle Between Privacy and Policy in Quon v. City on Ontario: Employee Privacy Rights and the Operational Realities of the Workplace on Display at the Supreme Court","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privacy rights; Battle; Supreme court; Privacy policy; Privacy laws of the United States; Information privacy; Privacy law; Right to privacy; Internet privacy; Political science; Law; Business; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.02076179928572717,"score_gpt":0.3068944878887991,"score_spread":0.2861326886030719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W806317943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9218377,0.000044339515,0.0000019447548,0.04166966,0.00025243402,0.0005532594,0.000018038972,0.000014821636,0.035607796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978249,0.000019419893,0.000035313074,0.000272148,0.00032400395,0.000026503585,0.000002060736,0.000007830781,0.021063691],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798566,0.0005596841,0.0002664068,0.0002369576,0.0006459883,0.00030531318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99453074,0.004655536,0.000106106934,0.00057943136,0.00005850167,0.00006967223],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017662466,0.00015107662,0.00018394753,0.000028283937,0.0020734882,0.00024000434,0.0008355849,0.00011298825,0.00013328347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001344022,0.000055362863,0.000054515982,0.000210178,0.0024065839,0.00014612766,0.00041420152,0.0005133582,0.00000709984],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001409139,0.000025338368,0.35299402,0.0000022753234,0.00002414964,2.5621264e-7,0.21305732,0.000005030352,0.000014354242,0.4304535,0.0031421203,0.00014070833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007471925,0.00004901165,0.61537874,0.000029060187,0.00002097897,6.292194e-7,0.0014942554,0.000009505184,0.0003078537,0.031370576,0.35044864,0.00014359171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26053154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6282892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39908293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019901904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025197002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}