{"meta":{"query_hash":"4826bf06c3f2","filters":{"topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation"},"cohort_total":118,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":118,"exported":118,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4826bf06c3f2","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Legal+Language+and+Interpretation"},"results":[{"id":"W125521770","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2560305","title":"The Use of 'Use': Legislative Intent, Plain Meaning, & Corpus Linguistics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Corpus linguistics; Linguistics; Meaning (existential); Legislature; Plain language; Quantitative linguistics; Natural language processing; Applied linguistics; Computer science; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.06685703779046978,"score_gpt":0.3243335371579432,"score_spread":0.2574764993674734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W125521770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16228095,0.06708152,0.06778815,0.122392416,0.0012420345,0.00008741588,0.0014054003,0.0003239308,0.5773982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877479,0.003929379,0.0034857031,0.0007324078,0.0003395966,0.00007516796,0.00012502278,0.00013166295,0.003433134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914773,0.00721207,0.00026950496,0.00036803816,0.0004909738,0.00018208267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9787694,0.01839956,0.0011522393,0.0008578236,0.00059105776,0.00022986352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069381357,0.0007132894,0.000736748,0.0063778474,0.0074891644,0.014111903,0.0020525574,0.00392907,0.0055087726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020564396,0.0010172374,0.00032626934,0.011337893,0.029538743,0.021830918,0.0040410855,0.006101283,0.00039862917],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013549831,0.000008857142,0.00045735372,0.000117264295,0.0000058347,0.0000522989,0.034980055,0.000101551566,0.00006498494,0.95431006,0.004699646,0.005188387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022774962,0.000023687817,0.0047684615,0.0011241384,0.00004562655,0.00044569705,0.056373432,0.0029126485,0.00060672016,0.81613517,0.11747759,0.00006415828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011078124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014796893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014111903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041837734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002504535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0366928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493465670","doi":"10.1017/s0008413100002516","title":"Some linguistic properties of legal notices","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Ambiguity; Directive; Interpretation (philosophy); Representation (politics); Phrase; Computer science; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01352950252367318,"score_gpt":0.24722279949903456,"score_spread":0.23369329697536137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493465670","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4895579,0.0014732705,0.30449295,0.0106323715,0.0005016811,0.00026538386,0.0011773964,0.0012532566,0.19064586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829783,0.00016979544,0.0138618825,0.00017531503,0.00024080931,0.00005089876,0.0003222849,0.00014074334,0.0020598555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917168,0.0031875488,0.0010396625,0.0010782876,0.0025393937,0.00043836114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9489031,0.03573598,0.0052839792,0.0038264482,0.005464138,0.000786388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005702313,0.0002878074,0.0005092375,0.005159271,0.0034717428,0.0063327337,0.0012904487,0.0022201047,0.006403466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042265102,0.00057561864,0.00080020865,0.0034453312,0.009422541,0.015384038,0.002929636,0.0027638252,0.0004581777],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059083042,0.000031531785,0.00274261,0.00010931938,0.000012573065,0.0003157884,0.008095126,0.00044215214,0.0018007098,0.97335345,0.0009012844,0.012136375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038529717,0.00008234494,0.008307999,0.00016120667,0.000044489007,0.0010902573,0.0069739143,0.010236082,0.0029737125,0.93607825,0.033927716,0.00008547442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027826724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014162388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006403466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029577988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011977159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03015709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1540657271","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1973558","title":"The Elimination of Broker Voting: Much Ado About Nothing?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Voting; Business; Law and economics; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Law; Economics; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.011101008765928537,"score_gpt":0.27190663225745726,"score_spread":0.26080562349152875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1540657271","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.100235276,0.003426978,0.021101989,0.42213115,0.003220696,0.00007377915,0.00024781196,0.0002431053,0.44931924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9374486,0.00044250753,0.0021089704,0.03431339,0.0019111158,0.000050143462,0.000050929313,0.00011707862,0.023557171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98168105,0.009560726,0.00061157544,0.0018846799,0.0035130056,0.0027489667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95380193,0.027720284,0.0038165483,0.0078061023,0.0044606226,0.0023944536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02011275,0.00031761717,0.0014554102,0.0011164832,0.004086837,0.006429211,0.002524189,0.008706753,0.023851203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066711344,0.00039795408,0.00085298065,0.0010601485,0.012492687,0.008700751,0.0032777928,0.008947594,0.002045357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018937931,0.00011181855,0.0031792952,0.00011527698,0.000090699476,0.00016383255,0.0013260766,0.00028555986,0.00027326777,0.91180307,0.047402818,0.035059024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012929046,0.00004363505,0.0029318763,0.000106337226,0.00007707397,0.00017512143,0.0015706274,0.0011670827,0.00054213393,0.9198054,0.073419936,0.00003154933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033465135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048386613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023851203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021837447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035394533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10636765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1563752931","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2026954","title":"Drafting Egypt's Constitution: Can a New Legal Framework Revive a Flawed Transition?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Transition (genetics); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.008517625268013569,"score_gpt":0.2933754799184375,"score_spread":0.2848578546504239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1563752931","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18864879,0.0032876062,0.032834984,0.3519661,0.0031525926,0.00033278824,0.00029796286,0.00034012788,0.41913906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9200987,0.0006786753,0.018517617,0.026940428,0.00032094814,0.00014659198,0.00008397238,0.000115216186,0.033097956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99186265,0.003127216,0.0007092914,0.0008084043,0.001748407,0.0017440373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99133825,0.0036645492,0.0006615671,0.0018533902,0.002072187,0.00041007868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026644541,0.00036742244,0.000659213,0.0016786692,0.0069835917,0.010189466,0.0019544964,0.008843234,0.004868618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033739936,0.00040248313,0.00064537517,0.0012575872,0.025647126,0.008431599,0.0047946116,0.012568416,0.00076760317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024561066,0.000015581918,0.00022696036,0.000026649803,0.000009789126,0.00010704634,0.003835918,0.00023398692,0.00015872759,0.98553306,0.0032217389,0.006605997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016846263,0.000059124603,0.002267507,0.00034822946,0.0000628028,0.00020007417,0.008972446,0.0015299172,0.0012859313,0.81957656,0.16541626,0.00011269531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030495172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03343255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030495172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011764209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02793295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14091152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592014777","doi":"10.4000/droitcultures.2880","title":"Langues officielles versus droits linguistiques : l’un exclut-il l’autre ?","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Droit et Cultures","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École Nationale d'Administration Publique","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018837339016467763,"score_gpt":0.3346721171976231,"score_spread":0.3158347781811553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1592014777","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1179955,0.014426172,0.0038803879,0.0702735,0.0010266606,0.00003338525,0.00010559752,0.000069838454,0.792189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9526968,0.0037071293,0.00059055747,0.0067803417,0.00061083137,0.000041900563,0.00004689249,0.00011924084,0.03540636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941345,0.0037181526,0.00018936084,0.00045587352,0.0007311593,0.0007709766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99451053,0.0033855604,0.0005911153,0.0004077486,0.00066871406,0.0004362329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036341718,0.00047472506,0.00052440964,0.0011198075,0.0076399897,0.015819898,0.0008752938,0.003129193,0.008382348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008325993,0.0002555465,0.00036166192,0.0012300055,0.0184083,0.009476685,0.0053327517,0.0069749993,0.0017269794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003917341,0.000018160466,0.0012395848,0.00008922661,0.000007153615,0.00010970206,0.08291786,0.000025660578,0.0002374573,0.9037299,0.0040442045,0.0075419634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004054163,0.00010339228,0.008383126,0.0014669895,0.000057806865,0.00041055665,0.21687111,0.00032856438,0.0011136738,0.12156231,0.64958453,0.00007740298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023135316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023135316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050572287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049569737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046001256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W160071724","doi":"","title":"Plain English in Quebec Legislation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Statute; Meaning (existential); Plain language; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Affect (linguistics); Political science; Plain English; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Medicine; Communication","score_opus":0.008466890841817872,"score_gpt":0.29698435496761105,"score_spread":0.28851746412579315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W160071724","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09490271,0.013178456,0.0042336048,0.1516084,0.0019282023,0.00014952719,0.0016894623,0.0003032979,0.7320063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8003249,0.0044095493,0.0024378402,0.020210965,0.00021841022,0.00010025588,0.00039262432,0.00009748904,0.1718079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705756,0.00091109006,0.00010146961,0.000297149,0.0010005947,0.00063220505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962919,0.0011741038,0.00026685957,0.00017226463,0.0018162205,0.00027867814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021887762,0.00035608743,0.00028871378,0.0012410478,0.009683637,0.0056646145,0.0008029038,0.0019034777,0.017552856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059461095,0.0002653555,0.00025505578,0.0017403151,0.007557348,0.0015956379,0.0012870162,0.0032324307,0.0010646821],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028456438,0.000043800745,0.003744865,0.00015248677,0.000010096032,0.00084076414,0.054780286,0.00040499002,0.0012921885,0.7142197,0.18892366,0.035558783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014126016,0.00001543417,0.019500252,0.00037032797,0.000014280348,0.00015965337,0.016926752,0.0006309454,0.00035529482,0.011248653,0.95070195,0.000062261555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9809201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9841217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07768825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07768825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05860203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5636703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970820959","doi":"10.5539/elt.v7n5p102","title":"A Contrastive Survey of Speech Acts in Hong Kong Bilingual Legislative Texts: A Case Study of CO and SPR","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Language Teaching","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Pragmatics; Linguistics; Legislation; Speech act; Realization (probability); Psychology; Contrastive analysis; Perspective (graphical); Contrastive linguistics; Political science; Computer science; Applied linguistics; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.016877238054850217,"score_gpt":0.34220535705836075,"score_spread":0.32532811900351055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970820959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987299,0.0000673132,0.000085102074,0.000039150822,0.0000029851583,0.000013760148,0.00004590484,0.0000011019688,0.0010147975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985788,0.00011792282,0.00018459387,0.000024671008,0.0000048747165,0.000019822879,0.00010215935,0.000004349138,0.0009627836],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734193,0.0015215386,0.0002579805,0.00028027158,0.00033650172,0.0002617466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939482,0.0029455847,0.0012716639,0.00029907798,0.0011514861,0.00038406768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022447607,0.00029151427,0.00029378344,0.002642932,0.002776871,0.0016841213,0.00040073026,0.00057473383,0.0012757836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006693656,0.00022676385,0.00017317817,0.0028501074,0.0023242559,0.0011310045,0.0016141336,0.0006508078,0.00023137052],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078323836,0.00007798768,0.100866415,0.00011641038,0.000011629304,0.0023156512,0.8851469,0.000027651186,0.0028219635,0.0006784607,0.00023605982,0.0076226275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030708945,0.000087227934,0.18798375,0.00005437303,0.000016269914,0.000908506,0.8040737,0.00017770636,0.0012591466,0.0000636942,0.005351942,0.000020639054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037849426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06629049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037849426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025505242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015392922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075258255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993357890","doi":"10.1093/slr/hml006","title":"How Legislation is Drafted and Enacted in Bangladesh","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statute Law Review","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Parliament; Legislature; Mandate; Commonwealth; Political science; Law; Legislative process; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.01136785493717765,"score_gpt":0.2900013341011395,"score_spread":0.27863347916396186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993357890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32773656,0.0108261695,0.005433276,0.033084612,0.0004605736,0.0006383086,0.0007769905,0.00010693312,0.6209366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89981073,0.013040554,0.005272368,0.002445521,0.0000939722,0.0002859652,0.0003759411,0.00012736392,0.07854765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9766103,0.013171217,0.0021370954,0.0009968103,0.0055435183,0.0015409747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98438454,0.008744748,0.002133357,0.0007370585,0.0034461578,0.00055409415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017859148,0.00021819671,0.00038435106,0.003545755,0.0058802045,0.013081202,0.0012519773,0.0023285698,0.0044057462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029066201,0.0006985612,0.00025969846,0.007904467,0.0074821175,0.0031210303,0.0021281273,0.0029758387,0.0016351808],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081005346,0.00009679024,0.016993405,0.00085810584,0.00005434227,0.005058158,0.40311086,0.0015560059,0.0036547715,0.44033495,0.020760095,0.1074415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004235026,0.0001332668,0.044225648,0.00157867,0.00004440831,0.00073982414,0.1586448,0.0005562961,0.0017318937,0.018487968,0.77365327,0.00016161449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10885331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17235938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10885331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026469376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02342657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21643943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020798792","doi":"10.1080/00085006.2008.11092571","title":"Writing Standard: Process of Macedonian Language Standardization","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Slavonic Papers","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Standardization; Macedonian; Norm (philosophy); Linguistics; Standard language; Process (computing); Computer science; Political science; Law; Programming language","score_opus":0.007279359737407534,"score_gpt":0.28336541123047104,"score_spread":0.27608605149306353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020798792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74068123,0.004221079,0.021527275,0.008332579,0.00043899304,0.0003032995,0.00021740075,0.00023489686,0.22404325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840571,0.00029993,0.003293906,0.0002146813,0.000038287086,0.00004972255,0.0000485217,0.000047800295,0.011950051],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812851,0.00863513,0.001740803,0.00221403,0.004637017,0.0014879939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783624,0.009398388,0.0025750087,0.0034189955,0.005462414,0.0007829921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018285643,0.0004927353,0.00051987317,0.004477311,0.008212614,0.009023617,0.001272824,0.0011010193,0.0020564173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0419552,0.00045713133,0.00025981385,0.002376676,0.019355563,0.003505948,0.008448267,0.0022237126,0.00047620464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031831092,0.000014456066,0.0045959447,0.00008792895,0.000007425061,0.00042397744,0.8387945,0.00012374265,0.0012758875,0.11438102,0.0018460518,0.038417302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003100281,0.00014272846,0.05409197,0.0010891327,0.00003342416,0.0011218424,0.3610837,0.0011980467,0.0065925666,0.07273793,0.50167483,0.0002028592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043530174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03384649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043530174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013628161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011981888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098879695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024403972","doi":"10.7202/042416ar","title":"Pour un manuel de légistique","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Training manual; Computer science; Legislature; Cover (algebra); Scheme (mathematics); Process (computing); Order (exchange); Operations research; Information retrieval; Engineering; Political science; Business; Mathematics; Law; Programming language","score_opus":0.005801337484957332,"score_gpt":0.2625865560614121,"score_spread":0.2567852185764548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024403972","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003844349,0.05049791,0.017154478,0.47314546,0.04354684,0.00008891736,0.00044256475,0.0011077137,0.41017178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11976617,0.03393652,0.027184261,0.13752252,0.045692965,0.00044023196,0.0007157195,0.0016463771,0.6330952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864733,0.006684418,0.0004655256,0.0012512789,0.0042627347,0.0008626754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879218,0.0066419346,0.0006724401,0.0013131388,0.002456197,0.0009944339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008489549,0.0011732599,0.0012877875,0.0019664892,0.007977973,0.014035516,0.0013627101,0.009169397,0.044172045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02242979,0.00047890402,0.0011348476,0.0017734692,0.00906595,0.011783939,0.003923489,0.021502567,0.018047627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005444322,0.000043938267,0.0004478751,0.00017088592,0.000015462047,0.000357786,0.0036253552,0.00019891879,0.0005435775,0.6958576,0.24921457,0.04946961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007491938,0.000009520956,0.00023022312,0.00016779079,0.0000025098723,0.00022107108,0.00069866114,0.0000938575,0.000120135475,0.016997099,0.981437,0.000014600839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010651938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012169946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044172045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064609027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063850554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14777023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028847006","doi":"10.1017/s082932010000702x","title":"Theories of Categorization: A Case Study of Cheques","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.017517435087542277,"score_gpt":0.27048286368126695,"score_spread":0.2529654285937247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028847006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.654089,0.0015204869,0.018223638,0.0062814993,0.00015203902,0.0003090472,0.00013527404,0.00012608181,0.31916296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.963449,0.000517964,0.0057385964,0.0003261283,0.00002676743,0.00014394264,0.00006369854,0.000059367907,0.02967439],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908516,0.006930031,0.00019681279,0.00049679086,0.00090808084,0.00061665545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98860884,0.008473176,0.0005247572,0.0009886869,0.0010758026,0.00032873394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070435796,0.00044241772,0.0007171462,0.0027984548,0.013111254,0.0071575716,0.001909147,0.0038600983,0.010985751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011116293,0.00031655218,0.00065710046,0.004834278,0.012647217,0.006343855,0.004568,0.0042702937,0.0009799298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010548548,0.00026544198,0.010861613,0.0002827227,0.000018760922,0.00427515,0.5791871,0.0007232074,0.0007946422,0.3563594,0.0057586837,0.04136777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043727945,0.00016176558,0.013293632,0.0005046319,0.000030130403,0.0030397377,0.6027171,0.004876875,0.0014356266,0.068038926,0.30577728,0.00008063183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018039225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030219875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9819608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008779541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027877367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06370032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042695409","doi":"10.7202/042406ar","title":"La stéréophonie législative, facteur de haute infidélité ?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; CLARITY; Statute; Legislature; Simplicity; Style (visual arts); Focus (optics); Law; Political science; Object (grammar); Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.006334597832786917,"score_gpt":0.2696395652041275,"score_spread":0.2633049673713406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042695409","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10695374,0.012880069,0.039265268,0.12223459,0.0036407667,0.00007657842,0.00051544554,0.00044800495,0.71398556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92418796,0.003230233,0.006530847,0.008502252,0.0011585457,0.000080655846,0.00015048649,0.00015018639,0.05600879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962865,0.0021712563,0.00012089811,0.00041238446,0.00062356377,0.00038536347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99741495,0.0013536088,0.0004278969,0.0001809947,0.0004926158,0.00012993453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037916303,0.00024303327,0.00024087816,0.0010047762,0.0029011585,0.0035565575,0.00037596186,0.0012135416,0.006426656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048260493,0.00018224736,0.0001627178,0.000978117,0.0072077266,0.0028800864,0.0008583798,0.0027340725,0.0010007194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002322448,0.000008204473,0.000988376,0.00006382539,0.0000038841213,0.00013772948,0.033613935,0.000045512756,0.001361845,0.93106544,0.012978801,0.019709267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011448484,0.000032868546,0.0058045327,0.00022431178,0.00001022687,0.00060376123,0.024029424,0.000285254,0.0014672336,0.029285131,0.9382115,0.000034330635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040830575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045345243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040830575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004779965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00345484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08118582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049826445","doi":"10.7202/042402ar","title":"L'interaction des techniques de rédaction et des techniques d'interprétation des lois","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislator; Interpretation (philosophy); Statute; Political science; Law; Testimonial; Lawmaking; Distrust; Legislature; Humanities; Epistemology; Philosophy; Legislation","score_opus":0.01135308943117734,"score_gpt":0.31736631097022555,"score_spread":0.3060132215390482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049826445","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05026641,0.0092713265,0.46753502,0.058276117,0.0009832414,0.000436848,0.00019092341,0.0010748721,0.41196513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7303236,0.0028264255,0.21329704,0.0045214333,0.0008981972,0.00084067526,0.00012121442,0.0009913978,0.04618006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7299543,0.21626566,0.0050615952,0.010285036,0.033434555,0.004998763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6859119,0.25677353,0.014590283,0.026787173,0.013493452,0.002443677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09943723,0.0011264489,0.00096914836,0.0035612262,0.0046918876,0.022694498,0.0031548038,0.0049264105,0.012898562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13056877,0.0015164511,0.002315699,0.0029633234,0.036554452,0.018547952,0.006898269,0.010385947,0.0030557008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015460602,0.00009177767,0.002628137,0.00037416353,0.00009166885,0.00011072855,0.018528257,0.00073495234,0.0019806742,0.89757484,0.0034212198,0.07430884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024244467,0.00047111514,0.017683368,0.0009338321,0.0001550637,0.0011032148,0.018198714,0.005425953,0.0076474645,0.58841634,0.3594523,0.0002702103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004557182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037991197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09943723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007617154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009521037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5258806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053280603","doi":"10.7202/042323ar","title":"Loi et héritage culturel","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Punctuation; Population; Law; Scope (computer science); Set (abstract data type); Legal writing; Political science; Linguistics; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Legal research","score_opus":0.005931192176188512,"score_gpt":0.2742402702540822,"score_spread":0.26830907807789367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053280603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014197042,0.0054501356,0.0007254031,0.015148452,0.0010545015,0.00002189546,0.00024817418,0.00008185517,0.9630725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2604074,0.005010738,0.0012736467,0.0037759857,0.00046203277,0.000050607097,0.0002909869,0.00014333926,0.72858524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990121,0.0003735877,0.000029821189,0.00013922677,0.00023487631,0.0002104163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995695,0.00008762961,0.000047782447,0.00008941609,0.00008963055,0.00011611494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009821194,0.0005778251,0.00031914213,0.0012096213,0.0071062865,0.008572499,0.0007267981,0.0017896761,0.066577934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015626514,0.00017621508,0.00020350263,0.0013897953,0.0077546495,0.0033831657,0.0038404672,0.0027050418,0.010974795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051320847,0.000053728218,0.002009284,0.00012678167,0.000010415551,0.0006273078,0.030696062,0.00008660117,0.00049347413,0.75572944,0.10943409,0.10068152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003805657,0.000008572043,0.0010414944,0.00010920998,0.0000020650368,0.00020570763,0.0069737025,0.000032987788,0.00017347216,0.009580966,0.981859,0.000008993856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037107527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061827216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066577934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067756344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032079893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22272539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077073892","doi":"10.7202/1023809ar","title":"Multilingual Legal Drafting, Translators’ Choices and the Principle of Lesser Evil","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Meta Journal des traducteurs","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Point (geometry); Position (finance); Process (computing); Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy; History; Mathematics","score_opus":0.022103007640218986,"score_gpt":0.3175323212462504,"score_spread":0.2954293136060314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077073892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0811651,0.008858386,0.15099417,0.22677715,0.0024898713,0.0002486306,0.00010563908,0.00041172557,0.5289494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9293963,0.001014093,0.028186042,0.010427069,0.00093764224,0.00023845307,0.00003892773,0.00034256306,0.02941884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.86429334,0.09949766,0.007379677,0.009657302,0.015970068,0.0032020872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88275623,0.07734482,0.009058869,0.018119138,0.010346373,0.0023746057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07227275,0.000680795,0.0008639613,0.002039733,0.0079018315,0.016507441,0.002188338,0.0083736805,0.0042706896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12125986,0.00077427796,0.000750615,0.0021321299,0.0553318,0.013576688,0.008916101,0.009283999,0.0013337365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037146554,0.000012162191,0.00031426764,0.000096921205,0.000012780752,0.00014579362,0.022514535,0.00018083656,0.00027261846,0.9638081,0.003593771,0.009011064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044340184,0.000054648794,0.0007991889,0.0004838793,0.000027469812,0.00055224344,0.009909067,0.0008382299,0.0013231987,0.84212583,0.14377375,0.00006831543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018919457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002573169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07227275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00556029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006759429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38221937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085476362","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmm002","title":"Legislative Drafting and Language in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statute Law Review","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Obligation; Normative; Government (linguistics); Legislature; Law; Civilization; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.010263075171416171,"score_gpt":0.32080361860021556,"score_spread":0.3105405434287994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085476362","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12615766,0.025749799,0.0012381603,0.099609405,0.0018982633,0.00040938403,0.0029525661,0.00029473347,0.74169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6850469,0.012647173,0.0025809903,0.011273141,0.00023220827,0.00018136975,0.0013062519,0.00018560191,0.28654644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98693514,0.0013651438,0.00067546725,0.0010572278,0.005865439,0.004101643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781788,0.005205234,0.0010985294,0.0006578046,0.012164003,0.002695649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008207993,0.0003603313,0.00073910895,0.0049203667,0.024776472,0.012108032,0.0033147251,0.003072234,0.015927829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027492937,0.0007664546,0.0004987044,0.010305625,0.008562414,0.0020918637,0.0039401576,0.0044966782,0.0010822822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067248926,0.00007636321,0.0073300926,0.0004253722,0.000028227782,0.00094677595,0.052834038,0.00097558653,0.00057637447,0.7038467,0.1654509,0.06744229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002967401,0.000022095806,0.025208961,0.00043829254,0.00003151257,0.00008524817,0.010644493,0.00064091885,0.00037557122,0.0075997524,0.9548163,0.000107217704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23569156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23569156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.41278195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88648945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095019064","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2002.9986631","title":"Improving legislative drafting capacity","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legislation; Law; Principal (computer security); Political science; Legislative assembly; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.038789550395226136,"score_gpt":0.27908085905250163,"score_spread":0.2402913086572755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095019064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047802,0.003393765,0.11961215,0.13566227,0.005205984,0.004124215,0.0017990705,0.02924745,0.65315306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38743725,0.004353402,0.17284115,0.021238573,0.006236158,0.0043343673,0.0049123596,0.008269796,0.39037687],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9339767,0.028279414,0.0052321088,0.008099506,0.016288064,0.008124174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.53819686,0.20512676,0.020412354,0.097842135,0.1092064,0.02921555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08707437,0.0012636936,0.0014980428,0.012958085,0.011463911,0.019024007,0.004847873,0.004932309,0.2522977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32637605,0.0028490736,0.001630222,0.00738215,0.0059675514,0.025278399,0.012581376,0.0064065857,0.09978124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020618572,0.0005928552,0.005669051,0.0005547879,0.00004328353,0.00040950804,0.0088725025,0.0031058413,0.0034820682,0.07077239,0.46866947,0.43762195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025317547,0.00019743499,0.0079049915,0.00075604854,0.000056578803,0.00025816623,0.00437961,0.0050158133,0.0023183564,0.0192979,0.95941395,0.00014797185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019434186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025653591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2522977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010220032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03319328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8440199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104654749","doi":"10.7202/1101221ar","title":"Les mots du droit : une grammatologie critique du droit international public","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.02288680002431749,"score_gpt":0.29992271728643155,"score_spread":0.2770359172621141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104654749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013147354,0.022102188,0.006369175,0.2442323,0.0018453958,0.000037790996,0.00048917986,0.00011662103,0.71166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7220961,0.012505922,0.0034299246,0.039210625,0.0017284295,0.00016943051,0.00032639125,0.00027268202,0.22026062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995295,0.0020602515,0.00011914504,0.00038609622,0.0014907704,0.0006487275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975012,0.0010007459,0.00021948674,0.00013294743,0.0009961087,0.00014949392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032708114,0.0006958791,0.00046171763,0.002865594,0.0107706785,0.011663637,0.0017887207,0.005208375,0.01008901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007081134,0.00031362125,0.00039162583,0.004788402,0.028867766,0.007492383,0.0030780404,0.0069015566,0.0012576609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005148654,0.0000024163219,0.00012839367,0.000030552437,0.0000010751525,0.000035460893,0.011541499,0.000046245837,0.00002778268,0.946102,0.038899697,0.0031798324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008893733,0.000007107546,0.001226887,0.0003781865,0.000007696518,0.00008380973,0.01939148,0.00025275038,0.0001466623,0.09212385,0.88634944,0.000023178276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.594121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5883249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.594121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03278994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019767938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81653863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147357191","doi":"10.7202/042814ar","title":"Le sens ordinaire des mots comme règle d'interprétation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Meaning (existential); Legislator; Literal (mathematical logic); Mistake; Context (archaeology); Linguistics; Statutory interpretation; Philosophy; Original meaning; Law; Epistemology; Legislation; Political science; History","score_opus":0.010782344751875164,"score_gpt":0.2709654093437196,"score_spread":0.2601830645918444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147357191","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009821462,0.0073840953,0.10736834,0.030748937,0.0052233106,0.00016888844,0.0008643502,0.001350365,0.8370702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5889063,0.007426181,0.07653147,0.006528433,0.005904657,0.00066981587,0.00093132554,0.0014448444,0.31165698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875606,0.007047163,0.0005378526,0.0011203937,0.0030604897,0.0006734153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938792,0.0030033262,0.00058114575,0.00091281824,0.0013996986,0.00022371321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007812588,0.001226903,0.00076158665,0.0030098355,0.003986427,0.014182262,0.0018626356,0.0035369971,0.021135226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016331807,0.0006392048,0.0011799723,0.0026060494,0.016533937,0.009154121,0.0032368477,0.006438926,0.0076363212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022118087,0.0000051996894,0.00025292468,0.000062330466,0.000008621269,0.0001106263,0.0054538893,0.00013275462,0.00038272777,0.96787775,0.0110488245,0.014642265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016597804,0.000023587963,0.00071104907,0.00018600283,0.000011300437,0.0004045945,0.0037390748,0.0006387525,0.0010841924,0.14115398,0.85199505,0.0000358596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018037332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011758333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021135226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059354957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005441489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0707044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262115130","doi":"","title":"Bilinguisme legislatif : regard sur l’interpretation et la redaction des lois bilingues au Canada (Statutory Bilingualism: Examining Statutory Interpretation and Drafting Bilingual Laws in Canada)","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Statutory interpretation; Redaction; Law; Legislation; Statutory law; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.011841637297709571,"score_gpt":0.27200408511962904,"score_spread":0.26016244782191944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262115130","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56102574,0.0037454073,0.02057522,0.03515853,0.00029452186,0.00027491004,0.0011021516,0.00018394797,0.37763956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96810776,0.0007303308,0.0039037103,0.0011028576,0.000023005186,0.000052802618,0.00014044969,0.000057708094,0.025881542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99502987,0.001511721,0.00017645287,0.0006669565,0.0016518007,0.000963113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99083215,0.0032899063,0.00069060054,0.00037003416,0.0043353625,0.00048189948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006366954,0.00027922506,0.00030513183,0.0022822146,0.0113302255,0.007775289,0.0011643426,0.0011122518,0.004943656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012278139,0.0003001358,0.000292886,0.0034274028,0.015976872,0.0021056382,0.0022398692,0.0025699951,0.00029195345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008013582,0.00003353933,0.029816547,0.00029681844,0.000024612289,0.00044021418,0.3264097,0.00087583624,0.002231065,0.56445336,0.015180704,0.06015745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004389683,0.000053318832,0.13794522,0.00094134425,0.000116489806,0.00028210666,0.3292363,0.0031168538,0.005071193,0.04507123,0.47793746,0.00018466068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98324883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99062914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10985904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10985904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14534841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79708683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269066253","doi":"","title":"Survol des droits linguistiques : Enfin de vrais droits linguistiques au Canada (A Look at Language Rights: True Language Rights in Canada at Last)","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Charter; Humanities; Sociology; Ethnology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0030818190554565464,"score_gpt":0.24270942013991928,"score_spread":0.23962760108446274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269066253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17266217,0.052642483,0.00096483645,0.3300099,0.001560875,0.00006458271,0.00096652494,0.00006177306,0.44106695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7249496,0.018043553,0.0005988127,0.027719246,0.00036093625,0.000032087686,0.0002231741,0.00007443789,0.2279981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99650925,0.0002576562,0.00004708495,0.00021954531,0.0010266381,0.0019398582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976757,0.00028792152,0.00010300169,0.0000645044,0.0009643754,0.0009044215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012927393,0.00027572934,0.00030941938,0.0016228473,0.027711187,0.011620834,0.0011408868,0.0031684313,0.007258475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002912177,0.000306185,0.00031549312,0.0032576742,0.014568271,0.003662743,0.0030825518,0.0043100584,0.0003731665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044752007,0.00003389702,0.013374658,0.00017081732,0.000020908976,0.0010215618,0.10112927,0.00032088035,0.0005315864,0.6424298,0.1818581,0.059063658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008216562,0.000012233583,0.03451142,0.00026151913,0.000020266214,0.00015351032,0.07334545,0.0001656294,0.00020991662,0.012182665,0.879071,0.000058180103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13482636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13482636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2040743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9782383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292006375","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139168533.001","title":"Introduction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Prayer; Kingdom; Law; Political science; English language; History; Classics; Linguistics; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.016195376398946297,"score_gpt":0.22212643550535374,"score_spread":0.20593105910640744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292006375","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005162476,0.0050707837,0.0015037847,0.0045294254,0.003625265,0.00005970394,0.00083002454,0.00020264456,0.98366207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0043633464,0.003251877,0.00088983105,0.0023444216,0.0009728145,0.000051151183,0.000760466,0.00015912567,0.987207],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992865,0.00009629408,0.000028282127,0.0001917586,0.00031212228,0.000085124826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994252,0.00011664732,0.00002626697,0.000076533186,0.00026132708,0.00009414183],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053450384,0.00063122594,0.00043776422,0.0009924897,0.0019928918,0.0044279452,0.0013164569,0.0020768691,0.3877143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020760342,0.0002211999,0.00036552065,0.0011072003,0.0013582432,0.0039017105,0.0021088808,0.0023322008,0.18101962],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023547045,0.00003515496,0.00015776952,0.00022831692,0.000002395293,0.00012338723,0.0010708282,0.00010065483,0.00023217504,0.14729588,0.7501207,0.10060923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.340333e-7,0.00000284257,0.000061160805,0.00008193248,4.0454248e-7,0.00004119168,0.00009649136,0.00000845443,0.000022017723,0.003997452,0.99568594,0.0000015028728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034916839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047460487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61228573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020742805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019957125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8733512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292298107","doi":"","title":"Les « dents » de la Loi sur les langues officielles: le recours judiciaire sous la partie X (The 'Teeth' in the Official Languages Act: The Court Remedy Under Part X)","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.025333398358721965,"score_gpt":0.3176593911655847,"score_spread":0.2923259928068628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292298107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11192549,0.0081583,0.002019421,0.06808681,0.0010303437,0.000078482444,0.00024136422,0.00007547158,0.80838424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70543146,0.0018532074,0.0005426133,0.018525431,0.0006646386,0.00006768067,0.00007393018,0.000056972236,0.272784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961772,0.000959698,0.0001299515,0.00045551275,0.0009515868,0.0013260533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979881,0.0008799585,0.00037373492,0.0001669687,0.00039131986,0.00019996654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026224472,0.0002594381,0.000287721,0.0006355867,0.008489416,0.007528691,0.0007852778,0.0046733352,0.009402116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040614028,0.00031452463,0.0004176029,0.00066756416,0.0069478736,0.0019959917,0.0027942213,0.0053879195,0.0017635277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055451175,0.00002745048,0.0025134871,0.00007600166,0.000010588171,0.00052181707,0.027691927,0.00014761648,0.00095325673,0.8757089,0.077525735,0.014767822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031000538,0.00010961147,0.023418797,0.00035597876,0.000032454158,0.0003247422,0.022867233,0.00027182192,0.0011164531,0.023016676,0.9283747,0.00008055342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1522709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23266113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9924106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007589392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0081384275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30276918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312552196","doi":"10.7202/1027339ar","title":"La langue du droit. Rosalind Greenstein (dir.), Langue, culture et code : regards croisés, CERLAC (Centre de recherches en Langues de Spécialité et Cultures) et L’Harmattan, 2003, 203 p., ISBN 2-7475-5334-5 Nicholas Kasirer (dir.), Le droit civil, avant tout un style ?, Montréal, Les Éditions Thémis, 2003, 228 p., ISBN 2-89400-180-0","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015965411862475416,"score_gpt":0.2882900295783926,"score_spread":0.2723246177159172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2312552196","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039001732,0.89911824,0.00085829676,0.048508745,0.009525946,0.000019897408,0.00037728393,0.000071474096,0.04112998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015247392,0.6989631,0.0014416258,0.009885581,0.004844619,0.000095681055,0.000616419,0.0004155788,0.26849005],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980184,0.0006264452,0.0001748162,0.00038951807,0.0006015093,0.00018933152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986981,0.00046195887,0.00018046664,0.000054929456,0.000463312,0.00014112241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022612314,0.0018689513,0.001160292,0.0028825607,0.00261855,0.007146331,0.0011141708,0.0038839933,0.044393197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035984823,0.0010198205,0.00066868035,0.005168376,0.0028519214,0.008735803,0.0024067448,0.0058676023,0.029156141],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024798153,0.000009654344,0.00023117848,0.00046153713,0.000008769513,0.000065996224,0.0014493508,0.000051337858,0.00009987653,0.018820062,0.90043896,0.07833849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004588441,0.0000059425174,0.0008552914,0.0008245532,0.000004178911,0.00015399224,0.0010057029,0.000024393476,0.00006848324,0.0029544523,0.9940858,0.000012567731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.097825795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14752826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097825795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00862556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006315738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19451278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339209625","doi":"10.7202/1035892ar","title":"La rédaction bilingue des comptes rendus des comités de la Chambre des communes","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Obligation; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.021626960998935865,"score_gpt":0.29766373861417855,"score_spread":0.2760367776152427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339209625","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17775793,0.0019972725,0.008368116,0.020063821,0.00026596276,0.000042744166,0.00014997153,0.000050622515,0.7913037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9404422,0.00039694883,0.0009792167,0.00084834703,0.000054444492,0.000029712051,0.00003154084,0.000035047167,0.057182513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935022,0.002833793,0.00012666552,0.0008468639,0.0013333334,0.0013571891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956846,0.0019177253,0.0005136638,0.00053612865,0.0009630871,0.00038468337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044754,0.0002808874,0.00032347193,0.0013026964,0.011972391,0.007946714,0.000891929,0.0022094387,0.011080246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00696527,0.00023383176,0.00032816132,0.0022210681,0.024374284,0.0028557545,0.0042244266,0.0031612061,0.00071273366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015583239,0.0000075927087,0.0015038872,0.000029465888,0.0000059474696,0.00015005254,0.05591259,0.00006606894,0.0003658768,0.9346451,0.0020371194,0.0052607283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000383217,0.000050461636,0.024074167,0.0004110956,0.00003732522,0.0004256365,0.090178944,0.00054117176,0.0014850927,0.2175094,0.6651619,0.00008651418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22310887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3399966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22310887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016815238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015241662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4436205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340449071","doi":"10.7202/1035644ar","title":"L’interprétation judiciaire des droits linguistiques au Canada et l’affaire Beaulac","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.008138708167493285,"score_gpt":0.2654651616229168,"score_spread":0.2573264534554235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340449071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08017239,0.0076062432,0.01978946,0.052769925,0.0011386472,0.00005711849,0.0005613477,0.00019360177,0.8377113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89158976,0.002294988,0.003995261,0.0055656135,0.00017730733,0.000033328026,0.00017612963,0.00016604367,0.09600161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99395555,0.0015840967,0.00015809221,0.00074579543,0.0023519464,0.0012045255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962709,0.0008039228,0.00020715882,0.00032853443,0.002066666,0.00032288744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025432815,0.00067225896,0.00051268993,0.0019683598,0.014008283,0.010505084,0.0017490194,0.0027976378,0.006774835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050863167,0.00035758235,0.00050111074,0.0028480268,0.024077876,0.0031428405,0.002713082,0.0064061545,0.00077651755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000258485,0.0000065734857,0.0019940657,0.000055742526,0.000017343704,0.00013326907,0.026796825,0.00019168213,0.0004700494,0.94696456,0.012415377,0.010928607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024043164,0.000025109584,0.016575666,0.00048641907,0.000081284175,0.0003047225,0.039792184,0.0011024236,0.0018493788,0.13283478,0.80676246,0.00016141657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92862034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95692575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07137966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060513403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.073453866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43905753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345472701","doi":"","title":"Some Problems with the Shared Meaning Rule as Formulated in R v Daoust and The Law of Bilingual Interpretation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Statutory interpretation; Law; Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.003891298027389843,"score_gpt":0.2513665626663399,"score_spread":0.24747526463895003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345472701","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074312374,0.0036225761,0.27042052,0.37919083,0.0048741507,0.00035738066,0.00050808367,0.0010154365,0.26569867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.835702,0.0010208866,0.11596501,0.025957081,0.0031624686,0.00059342507,0.00012283998,0.0004041624,0.01707219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9794012,0.011673534,0.001957114,0.0026530786,0.0030839771,0.0012311258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9604286,0.02824742,0.0014027634,0.005530013,0.0038231597,0.0005681566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036056504,0.00063221675,0.0020560473,0.0023668557,0.007801082,0.008107489,0.005802436,0.014861079,0.0059492528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07064117,0.0011514681,0.0019715314,0.0023443934,0.033041045,0.017833356,0.0057054013,0.018891558,0.0010986814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015841313,0.000007322486,0.00014878705,0.000019730782,0.000009754868,0.00007863216,0.0020441343,0.00016198625,0.000068732035,0.9903949,0.003691219,0.0033590763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003712098,0.000010367494,0.00016552671,0.000034034056,0.000014429684,0.00025490098,0.0006557856,0.0016932227,0.00025933594,0.98801047,0.00883105,0.000033751174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011892515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015367202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036056504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044344934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006391382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1906873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346719107","doi":"","title":"Rethinking the Interpretation of Bilingual Legislation: The Demise of the Shared Meaning Rule","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Presumption; Meaning (existential); Interpretation (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Legislature; Legislative intent; Linguistics; CLARITY; Argument (complex analysis); Divergence (linguistics); Epistemology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011762779660335603,"score_gpt":0.27760885556106873,"score_spread":0.2658460759007331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346719107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24834925,0.006195866,0.27625474,0.14587218,0.0022141142,0.0001430832,0.0001897496,0.0003977041,0.32038334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616279,0.00062862574,0.02975847,0.0034903043,0.00036300553,0.000054074797,0.000045208766,0.00015380063,0.0038785934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95484126,0.028180871,0.0021951944,0.003341567,0.009898937,0.0015420982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9691159,0.019381313,0.0022209901,0.0041800053,0.0046298895,0.0004718784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032982748,0.00052707107,0.0011140858,0.0033054217,0.007351336,0.010681703,0.0021879268,0.00513664,0.0016997658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059933506,0.0006220719,0.0011101775,0.0018289464,0.042863462,0.011982492,0.007476988,0.010218218,0.0004278553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018163078,0.000004628514,0.00039310622,0.000032906533,0.00000794716,0.00012759551,0.019951468,0.00022680209,0.00028354017,0.9691843,0.0009782416,0.008791338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029797355,0.000025768208,0.00071095163,0.00021618586,0.000025796091,0.00026906125,0.008045108,0.0026244512,0.0012564096,0.9458759,0.040874396,0.00004618745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010708114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011967681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032982748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008783558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012557313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17443156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2488304506","doi":"","title":"Bilingual Interpretation of Enactments in Canada: Principles v. Practice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Political science; Linguistics; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012269091142209096,"score_gpt":0.30492908268188895,"score_spread":0.29265999153967986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2488304506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12108563,0.0033455803,0.041506227,0.12043907,0.0005842185,0.0003606629,0.00051466684,0.0004085537,0.71175545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92092466,0.001018072,0.014775319,0.009331117,0.00011701281,0.00012855965,0.00011680876,0.00020391289,0.05338446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9692134,0.008420366,0.0013269633,0.0026332748,0.011790134,0.0066158706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97620755,0.009088617,0.0009958602,0.001965155,0.01016842,0.0015744239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019024657,0.000674053,0.00086781976,0.0023482095,0.020416943,0.014795782,0.0033779368,0.008869314,0.006969892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05151371,0.0009152496,0.0008003245,0.0044131083,0.02173551,0.006356654,0.00620947,0.012027556,0.0007007799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005751124,0.000034012595,0.0025755926,0.00009299382,0.00001984289,0.00040951907,0.039709777,0.0007374733,0.00036307375,0.9076205,0.02258348,0.025796175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017600792,0.00009708305,0.014047847,0.0011805715,0.00022483413,0.0008975577,0.061161954,0.007577667,0.0045374343,0.40743774,0.50234264,0.00031860342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9621709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9764109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9162312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08376876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32199478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6077877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2504073153","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511815300.004","title":"Legal theory: epistemology, language and legal reasoning","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sketch; Fiqh; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Islam; Computer science; Sharia; Algorithm; Theology","score_opus":0.011956841647874448,"score_gpt":0.233838866576516,"score_spread":0.22188202492864156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2504073153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005868921,0.068432406,0.038836934,0.045240384,0.0017061839,0.000052314335,0.00011525196,0.0000849326,0.8396627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6056811,0.081219636,0.04698179,0.014164081,0.004663083,0.00051247707,0.000503041,0.0002649778,0.2460098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998184,0.0011331207,0.00005904812,0.00012644728,0.00037926895,0.00011813302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983011,0.0013586443,0.00007238454,0.00008345795,0.00012957149,0.000054924327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021934947,0.0004763229,0.00053133693,0.002004283,0.0028348821,0.00789198,0.0010840017,0.0024000395,0.008675263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002916901,0.00029524692,0.00038259523,0.0025654314,0.021603225,0.008561726,0.0019350316,0.0050938968,0.001520129],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010824251,0.0000035834626,0.000020131707,0.00003458603,9.750402e-7,0.00001772528,0.0011193048,0.00007369563,0.000018760913,0.98948026,0.0046820077,0.0045480304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002737528,0.000003890582,0.000079548176,0.00017541631,0.000001547593,0.000052753774,0.0012416869,0.00029228828,0.00005348655,0.85776764,0.14032455,0.000004506058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030097999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033711917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008675263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004453518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034424344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03231275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521691047","doi":"","title":"Book Review: We Are Our Language: An Ethnography of Language Revitalization in a Northern Athabaskan Community","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of international women's studies","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Sociology; Autonomy; Indigenous; Gender studies; Context (archaeology); Anthropology; Media studies; Linguistics; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.023253905527100098,"score_gpt":0.3702929991689918,"score_spread":0.34703909364189167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521691047","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016422336,0.9266662,0.0002632874,0.027055608,0.011769715,0.00006529984,0.00034462343,0.000032531487,0.032160565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012511584,0.8986102,0.0005390248,0.008899919,0.004932681,0.00017721947,0.00055373344,0.000066214496,0.07370946],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919134,0.00023517737,0.00005832923,0.00011119687,0.00034788897,0.00005595149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99774903,0.001236404,0.00018540022,0.000053941778,0.0006749938,0.00010021613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087405613,0.0007187623,0.0010939931,0.0022875029,0.0018865382,0.003520873,0.0013840338,0.0018514611,0.0153832575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036736154,0.00040871388,0.00022337548,0.005954348,0.0018606058,0.0031473553,0.001316171,0.002778559,0.0045315344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011637349,0.00001644399,0.00034370393,0.0038005377,0.000012837675,0.00023909225,0.0061830883,0.00008952801,0.00022141454,0.0035079059,0.8930393,0.0925344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023957357,0.000014870532,0.0016162066,0.0037949143,0.000008609039,0.000489321,0.0033352533,0.000019713278,0.00007057665,0.00040781355,0.9902271,0.0000132444775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039774172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09219877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039774172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034676192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006361792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07908535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2548248757","doi":"10.71781/1814","title":"Charte canadienne et droits linguistiques : frontières allégoriques et autres assertions consensuelles","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.022873197086802577,"score_gpt":0.36559858306505705,"score_spread":0.34272538597825447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2548248757","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04541423,0.014451215,0.006216129,0.041795485,0.000986977,0.000047927326,0.0004080884,0.000098708624,0.8905812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8533741,0.007593976,0.0020494906,0.0045030247,0.00035457828,0.00009847945,0.00021875685,0.00010361535,0.131704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977289,0.00063738885,0.000058588368,0.00040638767,0.00067943905,0.0004892397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99663013,0.0012896637,0.00022901456,0.000321969,0.0012071759,0.00032200274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022569105,0.0005386955,0.00043753439,0.0029250388,0.0122941425,0.012336106,0.0009553777,0.0023525658,0.0116599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054087318,0.00020638331,0.0002740763,0.0036503025,0.027439557,0.0059232926,0.00323443,0.0053347424,0.0011275397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010548044,0.0000057485995,0.0004983318,0.000033038184,0.0000024183485,0.00006152558,0.013902607,0.000057144294,0.00008969301,0.9727937,0.0061682384,0.0063769408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017436809,0.000018429733,0.007478421,0.00058997085,0.00001827463,0.00014626853,0.035210077,0.000343724,0.00043651476,0.14971875,0.80597645,0.00004566556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6344893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73798203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3655107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03059363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027848026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7353265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555677156","doi":"10.7202/1037766ar","title":"Legal Language – Pragmatic Approaches to Its Interconnectivity with Legal Interpretation and Legal Translation1","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Meta Journal des traducteurs","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Scrutiny; German; Linguistics; Premise; Computer science; Epistemology; Psychology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.042937274449119066,"score_gpt":0.2813722736414379,"score_spread":0.23843499919231884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2555677156","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03302434,0.014124634,0.20479803,0.040765163,0.00074958155,0.00019187116,0.00011653856,0.00015299521,0.7060769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9421314,0.002928987,0.0407296,0.0014321225,0.00056366244,0.00023955411,0.00009603183,0.00017583712,0.011702754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9670579,0.027022742,0.00090828864,0.0014009743,0.0024443762,0.0011657564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793068,0.01530933,0.0017504783,0.0016207075,0.0014844773,0.0005281593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016859427,0.0011739732,0.0009626678,0.006262055,0.0090961065,0.01502178,0.0029314347,0.0064429995,0.008049326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019825166,0.000926497,0.0010367774,0.005066787,0.06936448,0.02090764,0.009309885,0.0047205375,0.0010034402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001110194,0.000011830322,0.00017927398,0.00010647361,0.0000064419246,0.00027347804,0.021836387,0.00017563508,0.00015500953,0.972911,0.0005808549,0.0037524763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014630106,0.000026087679,0.00056534796,0.0003248236,0.000013341028,0.0005183424,0.015680488,0.0013572725,0.00034384133,0.9267844,0.05434045,0.000031059462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045826263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00506609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016859427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074122767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006360626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08916223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592716210","doi":"10.17118/11143/10153","title":"Les droits linguistiques au Canada","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.00535703464936218,"score_gpt":0.21612915166550156,"score_spread":0.21077211701613938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592716210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019968318,0.11267873,0.001984259,0.082823314,0.0052048634,0.00007689586,0.008237839,0.00059625757,0.7684295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12622955,0.045046132,0.0024327647,0.007664202,0.00064238865,0.00006564135,0.0026671176,0.00037560053,0.8148766],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970431,0.00023227041,0.00009962834,0.00026840638,0.0017882934,0.0005682835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99619967,0.00047593008,0.00016043925,0.00020495575,0.0024486694,0.00051039783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001290265,0.000674238,0.0005001547,0.0033810409,0.010978889,0.0077962377,0.0010741972,0.0018159912,0.028877065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047877203,0.0004661246,0.00030899077,0.007458409,0.004611855,0.0018591585,0.0020889223,0.0036884502,0.0044876197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005698236,0.000016334066,0.002260745,0.00022511225,0.000011514656,0.00034467576,0.009900704,0.0002522328,0.000690997,0.16888297,0.71208066,0.10527708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001923483,0.000001603057,0.003666629,0.00012828872,0.0000031104,0.000054342316,0.0013044662,0.000043485008,0.000119653756,0.0012924443,0.99337053,0.000013430555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9922009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99453187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07462502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07462502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15861066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620240063","doi":"","title":"CANADA, La Corte Suprema ha affermato che nella provincia dell’Alberta non vige alcun diritto costituzionale al bilinguismo legislativo","year":2017,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.013439073427374817,"score_gpt":0.30187980784953516,"score_spread":0.28844073442216034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620240063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1030086,0.0039201267,0.0029231312,0.07593472,0.0015472103,0.0001456248,0.009532173,0.00066458125,0.80232376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40944517,0.0014160257,0.00346366,0.014289028,0.00015206545,0.00008516492,0.0023406,0.0001712678,0.568637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965533,0.00018764587,0.000071110764,0.0003589891,0.0016311208,0.0011978196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969451,0.00042501642,0.00014817932,0.00013741356,0.0018287749,0.0005155535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015653565,0.00038370123,0.0003685359,0.001993831,0.008704017,0.0066052387,0.0014912284,0.0017807608,0.032006435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003064075,0.00043634043,0.0006015621,0.0025048915,0.0027552277,0.00085251627,0.0017945025,0.0032255258,0.0021350342],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018831242,0.00007346815,0.04204821,0.00032522733,0.00017053065,0.0008116606,0.0069070347,0.0009534162,0.0039644777,0.44943655,0.42210028,0.073020875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043777836,0.000021772317,0.088541955,0.00012582821,0.00006690287,0.00016529541,0.00393354,0.00048501918,0.0012383196,0.0052761026,0.9000123,0.00008914391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.989037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9963658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050491333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050491333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.084469296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36634195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626759417","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0012","title":"Bilingual Interpretation Rules As A Component Of Language Rights In Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisprudence; Political science; Supreme court; Meaning (existential); Legislation; Law; Minority language; Linguistics; Secession; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01107821377210607,"score_gpt":0.2280969517864728,"score_spread":0.21701873801436672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626759417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04346773,0.004603842,0.0047033695,0.017078133,0.00023663214,0.000043370397,0.0001535211,0.000064601,0.9296488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94232076,0.0022544716,0.0027138314,0.0014613261,0.00009022471,0.000024161543,0.00009098779,0.00008354439,0.050960734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99464285,0.0010665949,0.00016733076,0.00048297216,0.0023313637,0.0013089632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99636674,0.0012278324,0.0001815679,0.00029125472,0.0015999072,0.0003326487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003013114,0.00030129636,0.00040279055,0.0017889948,0.012356415,0.011371842,0.0013349106,0.0018351986,0.005481034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004491083,0.00025273938,0.0002762543,0.002827458,0.026689505,0.0026197697,0.0026744949,0.0038928585,0.00035177497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074099257,0.0000063828347,0.00044986827,0.000024069093,0.0000023760213,0.00018015035,0.019129844,0.00024063072,0.00016158016,0.95905167,0.0078089917,0.012936964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016810623,0.000012358798,0.0049258624,0.00050385634,0.000023528597,0.00029053012,0.026022024,0.002056669,0.0010415373,0.3278052,0.63721395,0.0000877404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9494794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9653179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0921316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0921316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12100929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66846466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2673226964","doi":"","title":"La mise à jour des droits linguistiques canadiens / Michel Bastarache et Michel Doucet (dir.), Les droits linguistiques au Canada (3e éd.), Édtions Yvon Blais, 2013, 1296 pages","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Érudit (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Sociology","score_opus":0.006353465623330921,"score_gpt":0.2144174990847365,"score_spread":0.2080640334614056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2673226964","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060573164,0.67563015,0.001173328,0.27084494,0.020727064,0.000019211211,0.0007558998,0.00016758674,0.02462442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13744414,0.5974317,0.0038101594,0.023598438,0.014076205,0.000048276906,0.001024984,0.0004827509,0.22208336],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977549,0.00041316875,0.000095968135,0.0002548682,0.001178972,0.00030217864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974233,0.0005844814,0.00019934056,0.000057237383,0.0013737273,0.0003618787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032440647,0.0008896637,0.000677911,0.0022675863,0.0071753873,0.006642859,0.0012231265,0.0033213072,0.012283436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059824986,0.00055135315,0.0003441023,0.0029892626,0.0051255794,0.0030950368,0.001943322,0.004206103,0.0030085263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006729591,0.000015208954,0.0016964396,0.00032629637,0.000029887504,0.00034244405,0.007198195,0.00015051136,0.0004458588,0.01867589,0.8489155,0.12213652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005239853,0.0000063352663,0.0056547527,0.00046840758,0.00001482874,0.00040999104,0.0060558375,0.000106672174,0.00036653408,0.0015087663,0.98535675,0.00004601725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89032316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92184854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10967684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023232592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027535085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22064543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740009593","doi":"","title":"Software Support for Multi-Lingual Legislative Drafting","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NPARC","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Summit; Legislature; Work (physics); Software; Face (sociological concept); Civil society; Political science; Computer science; Software engineering; Public relations; Engineering; Politics; Sociology; Law; Geography; Programming language; Social science","score_opus":0.04031201512568208,"score_gpt":0.362732922926063,"score_spread":0.3224209078003809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740009593","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008495335,0.00027587023,0.8269962,0.0014532702,0.00025497013,0.00081099314,0.0009745255,0.1298715,0.030867336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10216406,0.00066642044,0.8429473,0.00058253284,0.00032119092,0.001179544,0.005924277,0.01991131,0.026303342],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98994595,0.0038612196,0.001700291,0.0013548613,0.002715508,0.00042207824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9322957,0.03779543,0.002687264,0.017983925,0.007839449,0.0013982973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02017626,0.0011108472,0.001115358,0.0049245944,0.002030102,0.006302814,0.0050991457,0.0019467924,0.028562915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05114209,0.0016331971,0.001724331,0.0037931204,0.001889249,0.010007106,0.0071858773,0.0026632815,0.016377587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061332824,0.000601443,0.004702181,0.0011695024,0.00022224845,0.0017173268,0.010491409,0.0056982785,0.016400399,0.0801016,0.10450007,0.77378213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064698356,0.00023962194,0.003927128,0.0008452786,0.00016129533,0.0019372773,0.0018159591,0.09414247,0.02635175,0.11441587,0.75519145,0.0003249675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026854235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032365154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028562915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019506336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004308823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10670352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759137770","doi":"","title":"Lost (and found) in Translation, ovvero l'esperienza della traduzione dei testi normativi in Svizzera e Canada","year":2011,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Research Padua  Archive (University of Padua)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Medicine; Art","score_opus":0.08537659557439257,"score_gpt":0.2979714025611766,"score_spread":0.212594806986784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759137770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1217748,0.006094979,0.03612544,0.031164773,0.0063665933,0.0003135062,0.0039410167,0.0012968325,0.792922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7946763,0.0024311908,0.013838049,0.005599954,0.0005530969,0.00025186976,0.0023418446,0.0017781305,0.17852964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98472136,0.005199395,0.0013995636,0.00197229,0.0056708986,0.0010364858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9805613,0.0064901686,0.0010512836,0.004420028,0.0068427245,0.0006344484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008772675,0.000868041,0.0009792019,0.0024714167,0.0042853705,0.0114380075,0.001396822,0.0016817541,0.02874582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03226553,0.00049632514,0.0005042492,0.003965695,0.012037624,0.006686264,0.005097859,0.0037774784,0.008693076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046193795,0.00013838743,0.021557182,0.0011773751,0.00009713733,0.001137612,0.09419148,0.00034382322,0.0059156287,0.500685,0.08707061,0.28722388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007320906,0.00018509243,0.032335445,0.0012075438,0.000102215505,0.0014912426,0.035971455,0.0010246277,0.009301735,0.09659933,0.8215489,0.0001592061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047800325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.075794905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9521997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008332192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010451569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096164405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759279867","doi":"","title":"Words & phrases judicially defined in Canadian courts and tribunals = Termes et locutions définis par les tribunaux canadiens.","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.013585008632870852,"score_gpt":0.26050957872835695,"score_spread":0.2469245700954861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759279867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010684249,0.038696554,0.002192871,0.012021924,0.0017306313,0.00009144629,0.00685517,0.000161963,0.92756516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4591527,0.046279654,0.007583808,0.0065684486,0.0011389612,0.00017222026,0.0077610137,0.0003938193,0.47094938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998137,0.0001684784,0.00008597447,0.00015191839,0.0009873956,0.00046924065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878365,0.00023866569,0.00011466254,0.000052045503,0.0006869394,0.00012410231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006141578,0.0005881792,0.0003158215,0.0037971262,0.0071968944,0.0073283683,0.0011728001,0.0009947281,0.023950037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029259557,0.00031362902,0.0002885371,0.012174086,0.007107629,0.0025850441,0.0010661244,0.0019922764,0.003438019],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012865499,0.0000053247827,0.00090778497,0.00018467076,0.00000424489,0.00007022486,0.009162539,0.000092625945,0.00034503345,0.6504558,0.30157474,0.037184156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040846558,0.000003294136,0.007604009,0.00023167883,0.0000067868446,0.000057406578,0.004657976,0.000065858156,0.00016724036,0.022946747,0.96422964,0.000025333331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96432364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9849865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04386558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04386558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07857533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31826854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761639815","doi":"","title":"Words that bind : words and phrases judicially considered by the Supreme Court of Canada and by the Judicial Committee of [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science","score_opus":0.010115703580239105,"score_gpt":0.2243171275757868,"score_spread":0.2142014239955477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761639815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00665578,0.025997115,0.005498693,0.04197501,0.0033021418,0.00007297775,0.0022122294,0.00030333918,0.91398287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4684963,0.01693003,0.009095262,0.02231775,0.0016867855,0.000156954,0.0017903158,0.00080098055,0.4787257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997265,0.00042606506,0.00007948962,0.00019329089,0.0013709913,0.0006651333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828607,0.0003094866,0.00012573267,0.00008114041,0.0010320756,0.00016538535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012913388,0.0007096356,0.00043692856,0.0024086297,0.010126172,0.009973766,0.001548635,0.0024787337,0.021811433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049094106,0.00040866286,0.00024709312,0.0051092505,0.013256456,0.005095354,0.0019056603,0.0030066734,0.0068499646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020797363,0.000005526599,0.00025780193,0.00007877496,0.0000034989444,0.000073433126,0.013759934,0.00004394651,0.00029117358,0.5624127,0.40502113,0.018031359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045401184,0.0000035519215,0.0015937346,0.00021898141,0.0000060996626,0.00005833267,0.010462882,0.00006769878,0.00029757392,0.039329905,0.94792795,0.000028668801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7757366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8783282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22426343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026193272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04910003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4511683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764666273","doi":"","title":"Survol des droits linguistiques : Enfin de vrais droits linguistiques au Canada (A Look at Language Rights: True Language Rights in Canada at Last)","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Charter; Humanities; Sociology; Ethnology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0030818190554565464,"score_gpt":0.24270942013991928,"score_spread":0.23962760108446274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2764666273","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17266217,0.052642483,0.00096483645,0.3300099,0.001560875,0.00006458271,0.00096652494,0.00006177306,0.44106695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7249496,0.018043553,0.0005988127,0.027719246,0.00036093625,0.000032087686,0.0002231741,0.00007443789,0.2279981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99650925,0.0002576562,0.00004708495,0.00021954531,0.0010266381,0.0019398582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976757,0.00028792152,0.00010300169,0.0000645044,0.0009643754,0.0009044215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012927393,0.00027572934,0.00030941938,0.0016228473,0.027711187,0.011620834,0.0011408868,0.0031684313,0.007258475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002912177,0.000306185,0.00031549312,0.0032576742,0.014568271,0.003662743,0.0030825518,0.0043100584,0.0003731665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044752007,0.00003389702,0.013374658,0.00017081732,0.000020908976,0.0010215618,0.10112927,0.00032088035,0.0005315864,0.6424298,0.1818581,0.059063658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008216562,0.000012233583,0.03451142,0.00026151913,0.000020266214,0.00015351032,0.07334545,0.0001656294,0.00020991662,0.012182665,0.879071,0.000058180103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13482636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13482636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2040743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9782383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790018451","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2018.2","title":"Notes Toward a Postmodern Principle","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discoverability; Interpretation (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Postmodernism; Statutory interpretation; Epistemology; Normative; Rhetorical question; Sociology; CITES; Directive; Reading (process); Linguistics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.028169165798758774,"score_gpt":0.3403192242615245,"score_spread":0.3121500584627657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790018451","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01632517,0.0027569118,0.06778946,0.14533278,0.0015028116,0.00009359783,0.00013187405,0.00016555136,0.76590174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84134084,0.0014386658,0.03139937,0.023169363,0.0026589544,0.00038398732,0.00009680641,0.00025392603,0.09925823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99028987,0.0040298607,0.00026746056,0.0014027196,0.0033369777,0.00067304255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99253815,0.004128305,0.00034211078,0.0011418024,0.0016052846,0.00024439808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013210707,0.00052415574,0.00043043256,0.001722742,0.010163065,0.009135892,0.0023964038,0.004967083,0.005993142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011529182,0.0003873356,0.00060149014,0.0011719826,0.070903696,0.011390996,0.0045283157,0.012291618,0.001235539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010730739,0.0000013681803,0.000016112428,0.000003169299,2.7269223e-7,0.000007577541,0.0010340562,0.000013675236,0.000017474087,0.99772197,0.00069538975,0.0004877972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072540406,0.0000067043434,0.00009126645,0.00004704114,0.000001696626,0.000041464322,0.0008258863,0.0002844958,0.00014707753,0.92186636,0.07667335,0.000007389767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025463266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026222022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025463266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015368271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014809564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11150509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800586352","doi":"10.1080/20508840.2018.1465250","title":"Professional legislative drafters: status, roles, education","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Theory and Practice of Legislation","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Public administration; Kingdom; Professional development; Professional association; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.01292731522742003,"score_gpt":0.3650538824196346,"score_spread":0.3521265671922146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800586352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050998494,0.02466166,0.005362289,0.21997657,0.003848577,0.00009226045,0.00009944389,0.00016932971,0.6947914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68460083,0.012709482,0.0023848345,0.0112123415,0.0016970139,0.00015830985,0.00011723552,0.00016454792,0.2869553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97838527,0.012123068,0.00070571544,0.00080064195,0.0054250895,0.0025601955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95543146,0.030925915,0.0032455123,0.0013310184,0.0054894537,0.0035766643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019298915,0.00028265157,0.0004095239,0.0017671898,0.011441669,0.018268963,0.0011497434,0.00392046,0.01048678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07354375,0.00047874768,0.0002117886,0.0025650202,0.023691664,0.009466105,0.0036520683,0.005741233,0.0020222545],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021050384,0.0000614669,0.0021814427,0.00012314446,0.00000262613,0.00018323782,0.2024395,0.00007519534,0.00014713634,0.6212015,0.10545163,0.06811212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010335979,0.000032285814,0.003547522,0.00062578236,0.000003280136,0.00012755572,0.064435534,0.00012614987,0.00013601499,0.031085948,0.899845,0.000024613273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014486809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02119621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019298915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071931677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016298082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102063596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887986758","doi":"10.29173/alr1297","title":"Legislating Language Use in Alberta: A Century of Incidental Provisions for a Fundamental Matter","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Legislature; Political science; Subject matter; Law; Linguistics; Sociology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01598940405306635,"score_gpt":0.3278651499158751,"score_spread":0.31187574586280875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887986758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24469338,0.0526912,0.0053335773,0.16071717,0.001496383,0.000069555324,0.0001991816,0.00012628363,0.5346733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87825614,0.013813322,0.0027295477,0.02072533,0.00029559262,0.000033558754,0.0000759928,0.000054296765,0.084016256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99419785,0.0012086888,0.00013387403,0.0005442231,0.0025861666,0.0013290994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99534214,0.002329476,0.00028153587,0.0002247412,0.0013958919,0.00042621917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006429988,0.00021372773,0.00030306785,0.0015151558,0.013027349,0.007732563,0.002230922,0.003262251,0.0021384617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007105738,0.00039217598,0.00023226325,0.0021284798,0.024746137,0.0017814009,0.0033915157,0.004685123,0.00013580745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003275415,0.000025763788,0.0032181663,0.00013391256,0.000012845709,0.00036246484,0.034260027,0.0006366362,0.0009520201,0.86980003,0.023700649,0.06686474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032851494,0.000054722394,0.034221124,0.00072693365,0.000063854255,0.00015618319,0.026875472,0.0006985541,0.0012307755,0.084069915,0.8517456,0.00012410812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9607677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98284227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.098351434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.098351434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14113636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71359295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899526143","doi":"10.5287/ora-1rn2pnqnz","title":"The rights of official language minority communities in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terminology; Political science; Meaning (existential); Norm (philosophy); Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.020802396351709926,"score_gpt":0.28570289508051483,"score_spread":0.2649004987288049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899526143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4571862,0.0025319543,0.002420744,0.029143207,0.00017104682,0.000118065414,0.00030001666,0.000050790393,0.508078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975716,0.0005649787,0.00047054535,0.0012347156,0.00001628805,0.000019801517,0.000038507424,0.00001305888,0.021926071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946727,0.000583512,0.00008765448,0.0003845157,0.0019073323,0.0023643037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99668807,0.00078255887,0.00027793393,0.00015297574,0.0010729709,0.0010254455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025664626,0.0002647755,0.00034878828,0.0011836529,0.02049244,0.008836665,0.0017654552,0.0016931786,0.0044487305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005175169,0.00021171976,0.00025286354,0.0017502893,0.0170409,0.0020959836,0.0056886706,0.0023735792,0.00020714784],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003041577,0.000027882428,0.006639701,0.0000775075,0.000008881318,0.0004874638,0.10704683,0.00053648517,0.0007704517,0.84904903,0.008415864,0.026909582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043824766,0.000052883428,0.034050945,0.000696887,0.000049151993,0.00032253962,0.2535505,0.002568951,0.0013697448,0.1369672,0.57015204,0.0001753477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9858365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9898836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09094773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09094773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17367172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65987504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904615132","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3264804","title":"Measuring Prescriptivity in Canadian Regulations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.016686354077594803,"score_gpt":0.2763803416534147,"score_spread":0.2596939875758199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904615132","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95083386,0.0006138385,0.001414712,0.0017904252,0.00004431539,0.00020658858,0.0015443368,0.00004276858,0.04350921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917571,0.00028481527,0.0023391505,0.0003492799,0.000013937832,0.000115615774,0.0010043738,0.000031587675,0.004104153],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9449741,0.0068748714,0.002926684,0.0038592862,0.036498807,0.0048662117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7853248,0.06393847,0.02967422,0.0071080304,0.10618849,0.007766026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029697236,0.0005354234,0.0008488132,0.011201076,0.013770353,0.009086652,0.0041854903,0.002109495,0.002850697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15883909,0.00092226145,0.0012609252,0.014537116,0.00659053,0.0026524856,0.0043178624,0.004283294,0.0003338687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021361736,0.0002780577,0.8618742,0.0002218718,0.00015671848,0.00022093137,0.07021098,0.0016408247,0.0009398004,0.022018498,0.0066596055,0.03556489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002742686,0.00007778369,0.94154114,0.000377553,0.00014344495,0.00010659233,0.025315605,0.0023536887,0.0013620196,0.0023209313,0.02619546,0.00017832614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9908721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99497664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16081615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16081615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22229515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9733343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905115839","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i4.5077","title":"The Value of Methodological Deductivism in Argument Construction","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European University Institute; McMaster University","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Section (typography); Epistemology; Dialectic; Value (mathematics); Argument map; Informal logic; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.052289089651204525,"score_gpt":0.3782583810100003,"score_spread":0.32596929135879577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905115839","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014760968,0.008282404,0.85776824,0.03906286,0.0007045053,0.0001526178,0.0000901605,0.00022518997,0.07895302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6381869,0.004607053,0.3471736,0.0029694138,0.0015756608,0.00056396425,0.00009987143,0.00023585782,0.004587641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.903393,0.07466412,0.0041725175,0.0054909727,0.010641925,0.0016375445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8283233,0.14081967,0.004789968,0.019484207,0.0053101326,0.0012727703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09485225,0.0012583265,0.0018149794,0.005910817,0.006194675,0.014331108,0.0050134896,0.0059459936,0.0034551157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10201872,0.001622654,0.002336147,0.0033881457,0.081081934,0.028168954,0.011778337,0.010397367,0.0009154187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007216858,0.000007515525,0.00010318767,0.000064126,0.00001386736,0.000018784845,0.0009338165,0.00036721744,0.00004692198,0.9955511,0.0002682973,0.002617984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010039662,0.0000071117693,0.000024956935,0.000036338803,0.000004264346,0.000020947655,0.00011724526,0.0007380135,0.00013870776,0.9952614,0.0036344868,0.0000064120077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001485578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015946287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09485225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008093497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047266055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50163263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914810151","doi":"10.1515/npf-2018-0034","title":"Regulating Charity in a Federated State: The Australian Perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nonprofit Policy Forum","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Politics; Principal (computer security); Public administration; Scope (computer science); State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Political science; Royal Commission; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.022779306100777077,"score_gpt":0.3738998931947204,"score_spread":0.35112058709394334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914810151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1468305,0.014702194,0.0065038335,0.39228967,0.0019641167,0.00009422785,0.00009574158,0.000045541503,0.4374742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91356564,0.0055225804,0.002387566,0.039198447,0.0005788831,0.00005455981,0.000017642724,0.000016683212,0.038658064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99270976,0.0043755416,0.00021786804,0.00045811723,0.0012108798,0.0010278817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99467576,0.0022099053,0.00048219057,0.00027695962,0.0015279739,0.00082720205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008437297,0.00020792175,0.00030379542,0.001748473,0.008477439,0.008876341,0.0014388012,0.00750071,0.0041954154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009629049,0.00033534726,0.00044507816,0.0014264447,0.013047406,0.0044080117,0.00586943,0.007941998,0.00032091967],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011753712,0.000039452938,0.0008142196,0.00010156699,0.0000061186697,0.00028925907,0.01597806,0.000388027,0.00020065991,0.96810424,0.0062091956,0.007857394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019313155,0.00018022323,0.015654149,0.0020612963,0.000050603237,0.0004890305,0.027433075,0.0043350626,0.00066872383,0.37634042,0.57264435,0.00012373822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10385463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.111160904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10385463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019746633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017728293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20650023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943253563","doi":"10.7202/1058256ar","title":"La modification des dispositions constitutionnelles relatives à l’usage de l’anglais ou du français","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.013803477302619955,"score_gpt":0.2635202801737545,"score_spread":0.24971680287113454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943253563","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33127502,0.0025223184,0.0024490259,0.010862502,0.00029725162,0.00020615393,0.00069430564,0.00005275696,0.6516406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7679081,0.0014853249,0.0014988524,0.0033093647,0.00006841133,0.00014540847,0.00020693336,0.000027251284,0.22535045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966274,0.00047074215,0.00010647618,0.00044238413,0.0009447803,0.0014082355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739695,0.0005711267,0.00026267933,0.00023720282,0.0012163974,0.0003155728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020590012,0.000250466,0.00019913868,0.0012663419,0.007994496,0.003344819,0.00071421487,0.0015924847,0.009573532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037594226,0.0002992575,0.00032077194,0.0013604246,0.0055607175,0.0009400844,0.0015666464,0.0027563456,0.0006228799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017439578,0.00012184777,0.03874784,0.00027060334,0.000075281874,0.0016241018,0.12679996,0.00089373736,0.009213865,0.68123823,0.03333552,0.10750465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003878475,0.000110036155,0.22126772,0.00039474064,0.000075227945,0.00028114274,0.030784477,0.00028317975,0.0034850333,0.008252972,0.7348692,0.0001575328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90023464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9629395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09976536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030679746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045181733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2225982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947589675","doi":"10.7202/1059339ar","title":"LA PRÉCARITÉ DES DROITS LINGUISTIQUES SCOLAIRES OU LES SINGULIÈRES DIFFICULTÉS DE MISE EN OEUVRE DE L’ARTICLE 23 DE LA CHARTE CANADIENNE DES DROITS ET LIBERTÉS","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.008899178926120882,"score_gpt":0.2741951505575788,"score_spread":0.2652959716314579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947589675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033289976,0.009468011,0.004403181,0.04349365,0.0008004256,0.000058565605,0.0002564597,0.00006557386,0.9081641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61561555,0.0057078074,0.002424189,0.010763892,0.00044514643,0.00017104456,0.00017867427,0.00014935542,0.3645444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99525577,0.0016052566,0.00019539453,0.0007498858,0.001059575,0.0011340807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99682474,0.0014653804,0.00036903954,0.00041030586,0.0006607098,0.00026979152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032055443,0.00048230877,0.00042263718,0.0014360298,0.0076192524,0.012462441,0.0016506755,0.0043504233,0.01637973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069376295,0.00033139708,0.0005399542,0.0018320252,0.018862259,0.0047726897,0.004326637,0.0056464686,0.0029601438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015476317,0.000010236178,0.0009666911,0.000078599114,0.000005785526,0.00017557891,0.019256685,0.00010573853,0.0002868165,0.957933,0.012985322,0.008179994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008140848,0.000018540104,0.0030148125,0.0003505727,0.000010823633,0.00018682158,0.013589674,0.00012082058,0.0006964833,0.053469174,0.92849183,0.00004228448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10439773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17663907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8956023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010468888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014077499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20758009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955727152","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmz008","title":"The Drafters’ Dance: The Complexity of Drafting Legislation and the Limitations of ‘Plain Language’ and ‘Good Law’ Initiatives","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statute Law Review","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legislation; Plain language; CLARITY; Law; Simplicity; Political science; Negotiation; Normative; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04602867560778381,"score_gpt":0.33057608494547897,"score_spread":0.2845474093376952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955727152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1203431,0.03421174,0.13942316,0.34635112,0.0022514171,0.00025779475,0.00014272367,0.00045881057,0.35656008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95909494,0.004887343,0.017695716,0.007858796,0.0004767121,0.00015968815,0.000039476654,0.00024063353,0.009546567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.88682836,0.09167118,0.0030823408,0.0031273877,0.013135766,0.002154925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7756696,0.19074045,0.008347078,0.010651068,0.012266338,0.0023255486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08343191,0.00044916256,0.00083745184,0.005847737,0.009938943,0.023867955,0.0025065278,0.0057215896,0.003993528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11623278,0.00089373044,0.000903923,0.0038305398,0.0697378,0.02115671,0.008107891,0.009990703,0.0005791379],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011967712,0.0000061881074,0.00034203858,0.00012371011,0.000008596852,0.0001289804,0.04132592,0.0003653272,0.0001526234,0.94431615,0.004205817,0.009012604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003977124,0.000057648296,0.0019122856,0.0016501967,0.000034162033,0.00034162798,0.044728655,0.0019580766,0.0007907822,0.55387044,0.39452258,0.000093782095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01807003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017852006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08343191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019007118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016980024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44123536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982364953","doi":"10.14746/cl.2019.37.5","title":"PREFACE (FERNANDO PRIETO RAMOS, GUEST EDITOR)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Legilinguistics","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"German; Norwegian; Legal translation; Civil code; Translation studies; Competence (human resources); Linguistics; Thematic structure; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.024194819717496912,"score_gpt":0.35753828090848455,"score_spread":0.3333434611909876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982364953","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012184397,0.012687822,0.0003178293,0.0663643,0.90909135,0.000038298393,0.0001914799,0.000104272156,0.011082758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023744015,0.017983,0.00053828565,0.04814544,0.8213719,0.00013159827,0.00033496422,0.00030950332,0.108810894],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981413,0.00029649853,0.00017210266,0.00036356595,0.0009110789,0.00011544591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98841697,0.0032987015,0.00061804336,0.0003268316,0.006089662,0.0012498805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002440802,0.0017392567,0.001391704,0.0030093517,0.0021932828,0.0062419423,0.0020002145,0.0031758256,0.06231582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015966058,0.00052361994,0.00068059296,0.0017855581,0.0010443337,0.0045939814,0.0023485816,0.007068402,0.04595878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009953126,0.000005616078,0.000021881298,0.00007864375,0.0000013711423,0.000032584136,0.000033367254,0.00001441204,0.000036952184,0.00036210104,0.99132055,0.008082545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043960376,0.000007466353,0.00018014344,0.0001766489,0.0000022915483,0.00009284972,0.00007540692,0.000030254889,0.00004089042,0.0003742638,0.99900824,0.0000070829033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027458954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033931695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06231582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00205459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023484118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20846719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009072630","doi":"10.5553/ejlr/138723702020022001001","title":"A Linguistic Insight into the Legislative Drafting of English-Speaking Jurisdictions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Law Reform","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Linguistics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02282715622133777,"score_gpt":0.2852341037927005,"score_spread":0.26240694757136274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009072630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2734623,0.0196555,0.04023339,0.058102768,0.0012081217,0.00019135523,0.00035855986,0.00013843608,0.6066496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9555042,0.0047229566,0.008466217,0.002130663,0.00039888316,0.000054096832,0.00010509221,0.00007882671,0.02853904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929329,0.004816244,0.00038225646,0.0003832438,0.0010090251,0.00047635142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991691,0.0049235304,0.0009298902,0.00027305135,0.0019055068,0.000277089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064406376,0.00023069054,0.00023496192,0.0019942294,0.005167709,0.00398684,0.0006069778,0.0011940582,0.0021047946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073441262,0.00027260283,0.0002410176,0.0016784606,0.010574924,0.0028322549,0.0014127224,0.002446037,0.0003065235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013876239,0.000019006804,0.0012128318,0.00013667291,0.0000037709726,0.0008893294,0.48636314,0.00013768233,0.0010392233,0.49191046,0.0047026123,0.013571374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007776955,0.000052965108,0.008854199,0.0008400206,0.000021465532,0.000926948,0.1076784,0.00068670284,0.0013709723,0.029118557,0.85039324,0.000048881444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035140302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04065442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035140302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069192997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055011525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069871545},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3107209022","doi":"10.3233/faia200865","title":"Plain Language Assessment of Statutes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Readability; Statute; Operationalization; Plain language; Computer science; Legislature; Legislation; Proxy (statistics); Plain English; Rewriting; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Programming language; Law; Machine learning","score_opus":0.029107683230061722,"score_gpt":0.33788050183367846,"score_spread":0.3087728186036167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107209022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21681398,0.0041658673,0.27705792,0.00434454,0.0006454341,0.000700569,0.004153009,0.0020888238,0.4900299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8114754,0.0015802664,0.14158744,0.0005438267,0.0002701535,0.00027381937,0.0040832716,0.00060672534,0.03957906],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893863,0.0034735473,0.0008797194,0.0007790003,0.0052967267,0.00018463237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9400312,0.031043945,0.0056922752,0.004989716,0.017767804,0.00047506407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008653994,0.00039211952,0.00036686138,0.00691071,0.0010444028,0.006912929,0.0011970401,0.0007784854,0.0096682245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08020973,0.00024202805,0.00038468576,0.0041607777,0.0022953441,0.005808196,0.00163451,0.0012998545,0.001848242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014248973,0.00013777599,0.02384263,0.0006678535,0.000057786907,0.0002717301,0.0126418825,0.007733458,0.0064582257,0.32237515,0.027101414,0.59856963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034538065,0.000410739,0.08269626,0.0022378042,0.00011365342,0.0011457556,0.01292682,0.053418435,0.02686547,0.39984268,0.42006445,0.00024338382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003588704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045480174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0096682245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002371321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018941548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045767248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120066650","doi":"10.32091/riid0024","title":"Application of information communication technology (ICT) to legislative drafting: case studies of legislative drafting assistant softwares in Nigeria and Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Information and Communications Technology; Engineering; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.1366142706643352,"score_gpt":0.5273066232018672,"score_spread":0.390692352537532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120066650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92587906,0.0013229285,0.0016117475,0.0051383222,0.000063550724,0.00031438822,0.00013965761,0.00004554548,0.06548478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9678296,0.0029530758,0.0046606534,0.0007763756,0.000015915264,0.000085849824,0.00012230426,0.00006487222,0.0234913],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894069,0.0039984724,0.0004272737,0.0005315238,0.0034108679,0.0022248907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806456,0.010442535,0.0014894143,0.0007202584,0.004724284,0.0019779822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006120489,0.0004335199,0.0005052179,0.003646614,0.03610672,0.0056684325,0.0020917929,0.0030611618,0.0026641174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025463432,0.00067880255,0.0004388882,0.00793567,0.008888381,0.0017372246,0.0030083733,0.002842065,0.00043371067],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022025857,0.00058162375,0.0629373,0.0006519272,0.00004966489,0.028098654,0.7520598,0.002363993,0.0025164194,0.042105895,0.011749091,0.09666545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006467816,0.00020463181,0.059570797,0.00069111533,0.00008803892,0.004092283,0.71447617,0.0018772385,0.0034082234,0.0014048937,0.21397504,0.0001469156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94359916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9862201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062178154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062178154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07947072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45113617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123822955","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Myles Mcgregor-Lowndes and Bob Wyatt (Eds.), Regulating Charities: The Inside Story, New York: Routledge (2017)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Political science; Power (physics); Politics; Legislator; Law; Storytelling; Sociology; Legislation; Narrative; Art","score_opus":0.018615693566523355,"score_gpt":0.30026930476576347,"score_spread":0.2816536111992401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123822955","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000113227594,0.9448674,0.00034673855,0.021234462,0.01411278,0.000040259427,0.00031904082,0.00006709773,0.018899085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008368042,0.92653143,0.00055652135,0.011549902,0.0067940606,0.00008852691,0.00048184986,0.00007797846,0.053082857],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889475,0.00017112595,0.00008482757,0.00013064596,0.00064970803,0.00006900564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99604684,0.002011469,0.00029750017,0.000086449276,0.0013082694,0.0002494068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012300273,0.0014348023,0.002079268,0.0037125545,0.0011083162,0.005718189,0.0018074817,0.0026723528,0.04315685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065744068,0.0009352463,0.0008541942,0.0077458518,0.001181053,0.0052875727,0.0014399224,0.005519823,0.03528629],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008088424,0.000008933699,0.000032033808,0.0013650648,0.000007738045,0.00002430857,0.00008775887,0.000040173,0.000030585186,0.0010671798,0.9526319,0.0446962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005218877,0.000007581548,0.00015451651,0.002245924,0.000008432514,0.00014230059,0.00008397232,0.000014468415,0.000017872277,0.000653207,0.9966581,0.000008358837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010678423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022311594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04315685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025524732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066887755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14437407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136833726","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3675761","title":"Why Write Statutes Which Some People Cannot Read?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.008372716202741989,"score_gpt":0.2675126354109079,"score_spread":0.2591399192081659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136833726","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022091417,0.0029541212,0.0125082135,0.76713216,0.004555489,0.000039577888,0.0002564081,0.0002980292,0.19016461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58018833,0.002611532,0.00754206,0.3321984,0.004046255,0.00015811887,0.00026054,0.0008219251,0.07217283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9759369,0.012576195,0.0011994975,0.0017568009,0.005847702,0.0026828486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92721033,0.048256245,0.0053494447,0.006149066,0.011222973,0.0018119343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018990064,0.00036367206,0.00081420096,0.0017579467,0.007455187,0.012599812,0.002023677,0.012029953,0.015098871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.098080404,0.0008560511,0.0006676666,0.002120171,0.023153437,0.0151093975,0.004363708,0.018110335,0.0063954834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002328572,0.000021502936,0.001658251,0.00011725206,0.000027107288,0.00026665098,0.026661605,0.00007569192,0.00020827424,0.74570197,0.21146433,0.013774052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005481795,0.00001741296,0.0015804713,0.00069702114,0.000039880113,0.00039010882,0.03884433,0.00044391176,0.00080727047,0.6390035,0.31805304,0.00006822399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0108480435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015272842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018990064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003255767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073258295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10043031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165623109","doi":"","title":"Bijuridism and Bilingualism in Canada: Ideals under Tension","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue française de linguistique appliquée","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neuroscience of multilingualism; Politics; Order (exchange); Compromise; Political science; Law; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.018542210847259828,"score_gpt":0.26756879208336126,"score_spread":0.24902658123610144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165623109","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35447007,0.026393637,0.0022483408,0.17591043,0.00063895434,0.00008127522,0.00030335612,0.00007746584,0.43987647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741122,0.0051281503,0.001119249,0.0060013183,0.00007499824,0.000019485138,0.000040160056,0.000028887276,0.013475631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941115,0.0011271832,0.00015746662,0.00047643675,0.0019283346,0.0021990824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951172,0.0014376306,0.0003681166,0.00012211537,0.00175525,0.001199815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004101158,0.00037565286,0.0005418331,0.0028903396,0.03946744,0.01180126,0.0016322528,0.0036041732,0.003604721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073086563,0.00032325,0.00036374244,0.0046457974,0.038748838,0.002568876,0.006191819,0.005468048,0.00016435212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049948496,0.000028111197,0.0047970247,0.00015919154,0.000015951257,0.0010133316,0.18014136,0.00018657974,0.0005436254,0.7809301,0.011107994,0.02102678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006716154,0.000042154265,0.023383152,0.0011915573,0.000087697146,0.000898342,0.34056425,0.00091941847,0.0010400031,0.118513525,0.5130397,0.0002530305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99243563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1803074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1803074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26864532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9507272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W31708651","doi":"10.3747/co.26.5123","title":"Vagueness and Ambiguity in Legal Interpretation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Ambiguity; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Linguistics; Fuzzy logic","score_opus":0.0069845376402705986,"score_gpt":0.30942492731859494,"score_spread":0.3024403896783244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W31708651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61689323,0.017321272,0.030975262,0.16447726,0.0006983492,0.000270689,0.0010543175,0.00013201704,0.16817765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99097157,0.0015777588,0.0026619707,0.0032421926,0.000111210364,0.00003227569,0.00011085733,0.000023687991,0.001268482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9513739,0.025592439,0.00553537,0.0017535134,0.013874179,0.0018706146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8317119,0.11406993,0.031557713,0.00573266,0.014687259,0.002240539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0425045,0.0003556369,0.0006840677,0.004913699,0.0049098977,0.0073218914,0.0022491682,0.002553368,0.0035602248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17835695,0.000687453,0.00088500004,0.0031343263,0.021259846,0.0053278245,0.006395007,0.0036499402,0.00038741756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003760811,0.000107369306,0.15810068,0.0013396605,0.00016336063,0.010904183,0.30940416,0.0022685267,0.0016424818,0.34565976,0.03390427,0.1361295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015773106,0.000121750025,0.07970931,0.0041649304,0.0001688025,0.010827929,0.15498738,0.006711062,0.0019952743,0.6098592,0.13082273,0.00047392194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12228608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10018634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12228608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014713149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020671902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24314857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209325648","doi":"10.13130/1971-8543/14436","title":"L’antinomia del reato culturalmente motivato. Ipotesi giusfilosofiche per un ripensamento","year":2020,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.024166769110460628,"score_gpt":0.22485386468083218,"score_spread":0.20068709557037157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209325648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053509537,0.022304889,0.009645799,0.105533324,0.002502555,0.00006239968,0.0001328507,0.000055495937,0.8062532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9108518,0.0066494206,0.0016383426,0.008464645,0.0029648084,0.00011066995,0.00006774803,0.00007213811,0.0691804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968777,0.0016501648,0.000067131485,0.0003757189,0.0006713575,0.00035801326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974688,0.0012654909,0.00039420486,0.00029568907,0.00039468223,0.0001811632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021001867,0.00053085276,0.00028113095,0.0017480752,0.002783145,0.00651581,0.0007708182,0.0020598725,0.0059806644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004308872,0.00022327669,0.00038172634,0.0011989052,0.02441867,0.0034454358,0.0027618783,0.0035850347,0.00082859496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008807093,0.000010646698,0.0009669171,0.00007107475,0.0000040333884,0.00011027543,0.0070278132,0.000042861004,0.00014867754,0.97467846,0.009285521,0.0076449476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015050109,0.000054733093,0.012226817,0.00056203466,0.000021519976,0.00080951594,0.01139618,0.00065714645,0.0007880145,0.38009164,0.5933386,0.000038706487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003569191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005676746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00651581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003659356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016362291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026550591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W339068569","doi":"","title":"A CORPUS-BASED ANALYSIS OF DEONTIC AND EPISTEMIC VALUES OF THE MODAL SHALL IN LEGAL TEXTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deontic logic; Linguistics; Meaning (existential); Modal verb; Sentence; Pragmatics; Obligation; Epistemic modality; Verb; Computer science; Modal; Natural language processing; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02005083112389101,"score_gpt":0.30308184728987475,"score_spread":0.28303101616598375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W339068569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9367717,0.0017713719,0.019131633,0.0010311158,0.00009821504,0.0005447545,0.009900509,0.00010367078,0.03064709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96702087,0.00066460745,0.01982483,0.00009313965,0.000038605296,0.0007187655,0.008794367,0.00007176671,0.0027729992],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996956,0.0018192476,0.00023471053,0.00034476764,0.00058731186,0.000057895984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9720558,0.02200234,0.0015479318,0.0011599335,0.0030154749,0.00021853673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003667146,0.00016800046,0.00025006037,0.007349534,0.0019333453,0.0021402927,0.0005157079,0.0005508478,0.0044176276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01563738,0.00020316898,0.00019386181,0.009904066,0.0019110154,0.002152701,0.001697333,0.0008080516,0.00042964832],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011044665,0.00094447593,0.10569598,0.0065696794,0.00021965294,0.0032679883,0.31667206,0.004787773,0.03303349,0.1265757,0.038928118,0.36220062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018819852,0.0004210202,0.37244788,0.0023033125,0.00025497304,0.0020629845,0.21514334,0.021692295,0.021323703,0.026173914,0.33777678,0.0002114841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004997355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009105812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007349534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017593816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011043272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01939398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205814575","doi":"10.2307/3504743","title":"10.2307/3504743","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Relevance (law); Political philosophy; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Politics; Philosophy; Public law","score_opus":0.004423186271412567,"score_gpt":0.22448061219380314,"score_spread":0.22005742592239058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205814575","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030605652,0.000385478,0.00034885417,0.00033073543,0.00038595693,0.000051107876,0.0009881048,0.00061101164,0.9965926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011230961,0.00042885524,0.00053911953,0.00047146168,0.000113007205,0.000038234855,0.0014772185,0.00040122386,0.99540776],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935216,0.00005831631,0.00005138957,0.00017025816,0.00026656807,0.000101355145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786633,0.00048955146,0.000082600505,0.0003703469,0.00052858196,0.00066257],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009336318,0.0016842041,0.0012561077,0.0024479073,0.0018500226,0.005152586,0.0020270273,0.0028193519,0.98443896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002408049,0.0008401493,0.00084084726,0.0028032253,0.0018269419,0.00609731,0.0043956907,0.0018018897,0.984632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001647251,0.00015551333,0.00046054236,0.00041990966,0.000014600567,0.00017499148,0.000090494286,0.00013431696,0.001180698,0.005758276,0.5986125,0.39283338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026414236,0.00003381736,0.0008596335,0.00020753336,0.0000067227215,0.00021746612,0.0001405085,0.00010421121,0.0001904542,0.0012945323,0.996903,0.000015771277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047848015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005079495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015561044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012071242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015862874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022195935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212796781","doi":"10.22215/etd/2004-05868","title":"Evaluating the punitive turn thesis: is Canadian penal discourse officially exemplifying a punitive mentality?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.06448230649826289,"score_gpt":0.44750628855372243,"score_spread":0.3830239820554595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212796781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4408547,0.0017366414,0.0019149003,0.0934796,0.0007307587,0.00011426711,0.0009171893,0.000068552974,0.46018332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815757,0.0005488543,0.0005613258,0.0027819874,0.0000790098,0.000033795317,0.00018892037,0.000058902926,0.014171489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871323,0.0018898159,0.00030918934,0.0010855502,0.006588316,0.0029948405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9567103,0.009088585,0.0037134772,0.0017758306,0.026001105,0.0027107703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0104842475,0.0007348918,0.00075078494,0.0054348297,0.027072381,0.020772137,0.0043815235,0.0044132844,0.014219739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07392047,0.0005050034,0.00052554125,0.0072550913,0.028662046,0.0066902586,0.005494447,0.0071239616,0.0007827112],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026538016,0.0001169036,0.03531776,0.00017656697,0.00007480717,0.0005315477,0.23386736,0.00061367964,0.00078227295,0.646367,0.052600503,0.02928618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009985612,0.00006429525,0.17591067,0.0010650305,0.00025930526,0.00022858298,0.52390355,0.0025777684,0.0022595795,0.08524807,0.20797645,0.00040681465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9909518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99350137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15683338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15683338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20105778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9779538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220723148","doi":"10.4324/9781315253770-30","title":"Language Laws and Collective Rights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.00953017180415712,"score_gpt":0.2714130888372983,"score_spread":0.2618829170331412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220723148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040970114,0.005759039,0.0018329925,0.0074865012,0.00017674715,0.000020033454,0.00005340996,0.000031312302,0.98054296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44368836,0.0072554816,0.0023359929,0.005876217,0.00049161864,0.00016655632,0.0001582214,0.00007169239,0.53995585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998596,0.00035060715,0.000023431938,0.0001387028,0.00044332692,0.00044787303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910307,0.00035926205,0.00006955134,0.00010592557,0.0002762861,0.00008591754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014940007,0.0004995269,0.00031944652,0.0016224942,0.008561888,0.0054906597,0.00082970934,0.00208895,0.021869779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015583824,0.0001969879,0.00032905827,0.0015813939,0.023774454,0.0029971104,0.0021556478,0.0021046544,0.0019543106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.1497303e-7,0.000002527454,0.000043902393,0.000009655055,6.19807e-7,0.000021585178,0.0015132877,0.00005125475,0.0000221274,0.98998916,0.0049869767,0.0033582062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056595472,0.000007011419,0.0008262125,0.00023581978,0.0000033292283,0.00005398975,0.00212518,0.00015303961,0.00008605096,0.3532355,0.64325845,0.000009767292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34591353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40527934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34591353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018914284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012452127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68780017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220964383","doi":"10.30853/phil20220144","title":"Linguoculturological Comparative Analysis of Legal Terminology in Judicial Practice in the USA and Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philology Theory & Practice","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terminology; Novelty; Vocabulary; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Linguistics; Sociology; Epistemology; History; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02498137040266672,"score_gpt":0.36700246698559474,"score_spread":0.342021096582928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220964383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9749297,0.0009088534,0.00017967183,0.0004965376,0.00001316382,0.000015113091,0.000107060245,0.0000034532059,0.023346484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99877983,0.0003153282,0.00011446315,0.000043548644,0.0000017647261,0.000005586988,0.00004876696,0.0000026263492,0.00068811636],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752015,0.00067306054,0.00010009734,0.00019078796,0.0009428693,0.0005729715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942847,0.0015841363,0.0005121358,0.00013680712,0.0030180477,0.00046407257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016888967,0.000117332136,0.0003338006,0.005282642,0.0073311473,0.0035922523,0.0007943435,0.00041832266,0.0020211595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009531822,0.00012922578,0.00015931182,0.011781112,0.0054809297,0.0009253306,0.0020147362,0.000716513,0.00008814047],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002484808,0.00008551854,0.136816,0.00039692238,0.000082835264,0.0015930723,0.6640582,0.00080062356,0.00421804,0.10470367,0.003974389,0.0830222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000957988,0.00004229914,0.49698755,0.00025535616,0.00006651397,0.0003684297,0.4689393,0.0005247464,0.0006829688,0.0025534655,0.029503029,0.000066767614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96869713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99033314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04842171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04842171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050058473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35132575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233958423","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_103733","title":"Self-Other Agreement","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Agreement; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.012153310569698827,"score_gpt":0.27170662861140343,"score_spread":0.2595533180417046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233958423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011989503,0.00017363287,0.005421848,0.0017427936,0.00020769722,0.00003192079,0.000033368073,0.00002723023,0.99116254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20227613,0.0004232398,0.004801406,0.002423429,0.00037834333,0.0002686143,0.0001751404,0.00018471225,0.78906906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956761,0.0014362208,0.0001784935,0.000909061,0.0012711307,0.0005290489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983871,0.0005666448,0.000071407994,0.00044763973,0.00042236905,0.0001048298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034784141,0.0005858573,0.00066886237,0.0013360357,0.0061764773,0.0074876575,0.0020274837,0.004186442,0.046181474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064500025,0.00044004948,0.0007021908,0.0010571993,0.013500086,0.008960915,0.004856832,0.0074796146,0.0116474265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001181063,0.0000027730073,0.0000058619476,0.0000026015286,5.18473e-7,0.000005998059,0.0002836957,0.0000123561285,0.000014144758,0.99504554,0.003080657,0.0015446842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046348287,0.0000040106584,0.00005129282,0.000038921542,0.0000024513201,0.000041608448,0.00047643765,0.00016321156,0.0001741085,0.8743947,0.12464199,0.0000066326934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036149397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004559473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046181474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043658027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035669687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15449244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237208509","doi":"10.17118/11143/16164","title":"La jurilinguistique et l’égalité : les droits linguistiques en tant qu’accords incomplètement théorisés","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.010418918497763182,"score_gpt":0.29530726301331295,"score_spread":0.2848883445155498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237208509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04217228,0.008278961,0.05756082,0.04339262,0.00086014747,0.000028157112,0.0001419045,0.00017799983,0.847387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90365845,0.002502042,0.0068068616,0.0035256597,0.00050843455,0.00008228224,0.00008352318,0.00027386064,0.082558885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960427,0.0021723092,0.00012722095,0.0006869718,0.00062347844,0.00034730043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978527,0.0010371577,0.00024504328,0.0004526778,0.00030223883,0.000110174675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033599825,0.00052818557,0.0005614461,0.0014534489,0.004891555,0.010323367,0.0014507931,0.0031711103,0.0077634444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005434956,0.00044330655,0.00052397815,0.0016328231,0.02495223,0.013406806,0.004022054,0.006450296,0.0011669925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006232523,0.0000015518859,0.00007903546,0.000010553901,0.0000013041571,0.000015317515,0.005104242,0.000049588532,0.000038242237,0.99223304,0.0008116364,0.0016492846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001184572,0.000013517496,0.00092422194,0.00021584556,0.000015799995,0.00013275888,0.009171163,0.00093613315,0.0003468112,0.7022788,0.28592288,0.000030199211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027101723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022197623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027101723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074907164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031095522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054349184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244496524","doi":"10.5040/9781474292320.0016","title":"Comparing Multilingual Practices in the EU and the Canadian Legal Systems: The Case of Terminological Choices in Legislative Drafting The work of the author has been supported by the Polish National Science Centre funds allocated on the basis of decision no. DEC-20137/11/D/HS5/01822.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Bloomsbury Methuen Drama eBooks","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Work (physics); Political science; Public administration; Law; Engineering ethics; Library science; Engineering; Computer science; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.08062050448646282,"score_gpt":0.34540122688397745,"score_spread":0.2647807223975146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244496524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08119861,0.00537424,0.002375932,0.008319881,0.0001311241,0.000052294836,0.00014351931,0.000043014177,0.9023614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9407415,0.0018688974,0.0020354157,0.00074501167,0.000035137047,0.000036585352,0.00010305982,0.000076930366,0.054357555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893919,0.003387709,0.00020924,0.0006059112,0.0036876446,0.0027175068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929477,0.0038996222,0.0002934533,0.00039901538,0.0020278008,0.00043246505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007323957,0.00043907444,0.00046326482,0.003919246,0.021866005,0.016925653,0.0026699074,0.0023773988,0.00640889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01565674,0.0003224439,0.00037442814,0.0082516335,0.024436623,0.0042565144,0.004343634,0.0036987066,0.00033735653],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017755854,0.000008475252,0.0007139703,0.00004221991,0.0000063655175,0.00018346279,0.082807735,0.00024007194,0.00010982932,0.89074594,0.0077798553,0.017344192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022485658,0.000030792045,0.017793903,0.0009600979,0.00007270395,0.00026626766,0.2403187,0.0015692222,0.0009453739,0.15083545,0.58705235,0.00013266673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9483812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98182493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10861683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10861683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09438783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78807396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285795054","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v15n3p54","title":"The Competence of the Electoral Commission to Conduct Free and Fair Elections in Tanzania: A Legal Analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Political science; Presidential system; Democracy; Law; Public administration; General election; Impartiality; Jurisdiction; Politics","score_opus":0.01290626226697857,"score_gpt":0.305085606901815,"score_spread":0.29217934463483647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285795054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7825624,0.0026228882,0.0048650815,0.017760124,0.000115877985,0.0002233368,0.00015530223,0.000027990322,0.19166698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932288,0.0003488308,0.00090298115,0.0005407143,0.00004996525,0.000041259504,0.000027303864,0.000004334472,0.0048558214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951508,0.0016422891,0.00043366995,0.0002986772,0.0011096527,0.0013648336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9729206,0.017376699,0.0043702913,0.000837031,0.0034937146,0.001001697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007761495,0.00009736995,0.0001863613,0.0027231239,0.0056131626,0.006789511,0.0011605683,0.0020184556,0.004445025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02163333,0.00040185204,0.0002632052,0.0018615413,0.0057785204,0.0022961348,0.0021368647,0.0024321852,0.00039296877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004867086,0.000055040335,0.021544859,0.00015732287,0.000008398098,0.001986972,0.017063586,0.0008662583,0.00078446727,0.9411791,0.0035086407,0.01279653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019174845,0.00058650854,0.4430758,0.0030769412,0.000396741,0.0039272495,0.09769373,0.022213405,0.0048984555,0.20365098,0.21993831,0.00035004425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07371302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09354837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07371302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008858137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012028939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14656788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320169557","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4346447","title":"A First Nations Voice and the Exercise of Constitutional Drafting","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free Exercise Clause; Political science; Law; First amendment","score_opus":0.006774712304847665,"score_gpt":0.2740369906969946,"score_spread":0.26726227839214695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320169557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032203786,0.0032955396,0.023074698,0.08795115,0.0008746672,0.00008002569,0.000065912645,0.00009659644,0.8523576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9379132,0.0007762084,0.0068916767,0.009261774,0.0005484404,0.0001938431,0.000031178148,0.00012963125,0.044254187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9329773,0.048454907,0.0019672557,0.0048163584,0.006450039,0.005334058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9197131,0.06590743,0.0026372415,0.006282715,0.0038999142,0.001559587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06131771,0.00067305355,0.0012514342,0.0030529045,0.015829902,0.024168147,0.0033521692,0.022173008,0.009774512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.093756124,0.0009577322,0.0011297818,0.0028313946,0.05127381,0.012474922,0.0076819025,0.02033907,0.0010376248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067703427,0.000005538048,0.0000648108,0.0000076198507,0.0000029645298,0.000032855827,0.0020846631,0.00008202031,0.0000377614,0.9953779,0.0011378308,0.0011591975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021460326,0.000016775388,0.00029525725,0.00014327919,0.000012789261,0.000055312477,0.001984981,0.00066745904,0.0003398849,0.9649043,0.031526946,0.000031482607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010820613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014183889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06131771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008835638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01446795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32428294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377239793","doi":"10.1515/9780228014775-014","title":"Should Quebec Adopt a Written Constitution? A (But Not The) Conclusion","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Linguistics; History; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02891901232179405,"score_gpt":0.2585544050376543,"score_spread":0.22963539271586025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377239793","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01206795,0.009695925,0.0017176826,0.6265467,0.004677604,0.00007788862,0.0007198125,0.000110433575,0.344386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22543724,0.0038649475,0.0030376548,0.28703025,0.0012279487,0.00015615742,0.00021939153,0.000120070436,0.4789063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99629164,0.00096177415,0.00010454536,0.00037907125,0.0011862251,0.001076776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967301,0.000708637,0.000113813185,0.00024554337,0.0017598463,0.00044201265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005029731,0.00048968155,0.00058857846,0.0008464012,0.010505485,0.0099785235,0.0023139524,0.012741318,0.016527409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008282761,0.0004030133,0.00063467084,0.0013761374,0.009986403,0.00514439,0.0023267893,0.012682247,0.0014171778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031290634,0.00002640759,0.0005452338,0.00007499442,0.000020840676,0.0001663053,0.0023387433,0.00023929244,0.00019398701,0.79123694,0.19462124,0.010504741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007204587,0.000024210882,0.0038454584,0.00057595817,0.00004900448,0.00008704293,0.0052446695,0.00047282575,0.00041775306,0.09627562,0.8928523,0.00008320877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9480654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94781744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0519346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04031637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09058033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29251713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387607509","doi":"10.1007/s11196-023-10051-w","title":"Correction: Religious and Cultural Expressions in Legal Discourse: Evidence from Interpreting Canadian Courts Hearings from Arabic into English","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arabic; Linguistics; Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0193043582254333,"score_gpt":0.34828267555918047,"score_spread":0.32897831733374716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387607509","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023608482,0.0010178731,0.0011118846,0.23919883,0.7338965,0.00015707167,0.0045572706,0.000766272,0.016933395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15527205,0.0071446504,0.0068928576,0.1487271,0.11523266,0.0011039921,0.0032959462,0.0030899025,0.5592408],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99096394,0.0008584394,0.0012653165,0.0010319434,0.0044912696,0.0013890918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8828424,0.020287942,0.0033381665,0.006175323,0.08423763,0.0031184545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050762547,0.0018847559,0.0025395344,0.0041819303,0.01623938,0.007347419,0.0076232334,0.017279461,0.059396215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14037655,0.0013297361,0.0009254894,0.0074258978,0.0080712475,0.003375085,0.0042295647,0.016154358,0.023281328],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046205627,0.0000059160066,0.00016383207,0.00018645923,0.000011737008,0.0003961896,0.0017223476,0.000035320278,0.000071923474,0.0015495348,0.9911678,0.0046427012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008080496,0.000019488467,0.0044851527,0.0010087721,0.00007663464,0.0006325724,0.0072726337,0.00042589405,0.00063664786,0.001589888,0.9836314,0.00014020727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6137957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6345025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3862043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019107867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77695745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390746775","doi":"","title":"DROIT COMMUN, LANGUE COMMUNE: UN RETOUR SUR L'INTERPRÉTATION JUDICIAIRE DU DROIT LINGUISTIQUE AU QUÉBEC À LA LUMIÈRE DU DROIT COMMUN","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09393303450070303,"score_gpt":0.4825885199579052,"score_spread":0.3886554854572022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390746775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3110717,0.021662282,0.005956189,0.14365585,0.0021213437,0.00005342745,0.0007620207,0.00012621171,0.514591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9516179,0.002354688,0.00092420436,0.004990247,0.00015686231,0.000018772591,0.00008477742,0.000057537112,0.039795008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970657,0.0010106612,0.0000881984,0.000365195,0.0008297576,0.0006404298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99669635,0.0007494058,0.0001786626,0.00016037907,0.0017269924,0.00048818253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023935384,0.00044802128,0.00040532893,0.0015081327,0.015742192,0.007933688,0.0013783101,0.0022695863,0.004178738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038238915,0.0002242382,0.00033745705,0.0022929497,0.019201603,0.0018970689,0.0019639444,0.005113263,0.00028902333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009322495,0.000029909566,0.019400101,0.00018292954,0.0000388569,0.0006331505,0.19848603,0.0004467438,0.0008528268,0.68614686,0.055395246,0.03829406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032674943,0.00005326619,0.09188461,0.0009414872,0.00009398594,0.00024705104,0.15058143,0.0013285634,0.00065670884,0.029560003,0.7244251,0.00019512561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9868983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06821192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06821192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055228334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4949144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392319020","doi":"","title":"Le style clair en droit : étude comparative du discours juridique en anglais et en français, avant et après simplification. Le plain language dans la communication juridique avec le grand public.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plain language; Linguistics; Plain English; Political science; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009774518143274995,"score_gpt":0.2600888495350963,"score_spread":0.2503143313918213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392319020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8748504,0.0052394965,0.0025297774,0.0030140495,0.00026564745,0.00013835865,0.002895939,0.000049898877,0.1110165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97676885,0.002483875,0.0009035068,0.0003197223,0.00006423025,0.00018349028,0.0013600236,0.000065518136,0.017850861],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696344,0.0011792473,0.0002672221,0.00036240363,0.00095497444,0.00027284704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986166,0.0075612683,0.0018498114,0.0005189298,0.0034667514,0.00043731285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029862684,0.00040100256,0.000400766,0.0046850853,0.0046783974,0.0040185773,0.00060439535,0.0005828436,0.009364136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012841375,0.00037248514,0.00020488378,0.0071986257,0.0038358911,0.0032722251,0.0018341114,0.0014434301,0.0010578855],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009050923,0.000025358815,0.035423867,0.0008265427,0.000024917115,0.00042722438,0.9042962,0.00008425092,0.0016062076,0.017202025,0.006763499,0.033229247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013208631,0.000054201006,0.24730766,0.00096831535,0.00004654731,0.00051773124,0.51577216,0.00017307558,0.00082011597,0.0009914654,0.23326337,0.000072149254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2649979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36938336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2649979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068845768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072617154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5269109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392408156","doi":"","title":"La francophonie canadienne divisée autour des droits linguistiques prévus dans la Constitution : entre interprétation symétrique et interprétation asymétrique, entre intention législative comme stratégie judiciaire et contraintes juridiques","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Constitution; Legislature; Judicial interpretation; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.009869882018331241,"score_gpt":0.2708574911608414,"score_spread":0.2609876091425102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392408156","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10164059,0.01405352,0.0076022577,0.08909341,0.0011532895,0.000059639795,0.0003860417,0.00009493095,0.78591627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9166011,0.0026118853,0.0013030353,0.005376131,0.00014438322,0.000035771518,0.000089238856,0.000049692306,0.073788784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995654,0.0012958106,0.00011139463,0.00060040795,0.0013137242,0.0010246274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958753,0.0012394865,0.0002758906,0.00027629294,0.0018671841,0.00046589584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032794182,0.00056600105,0.00044882463,0.0021903024,0.018176898,0.011205096,0.0012520589,0.0039082114,0.008910294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049477182,0.0002779708,0.0004120853,0.0027183173,0.03170933,0.003593338,0.0031482815,0.0058626146,0.00090123934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026599962,0.000011114263,0.0033068187,0.00007339045,0.00001585812,0.00030147273,0.061542235,0.00015817017,0.0003116907,0.9077304,0.013638671,0.012883534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029309575,0.00003997267,0.028108569,0.0007505072,0.000062269544,0.0004023483,0.08694122,0.0005261868,0.0010559168,0.14292112,0.7390075,0.00015521808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8270863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90258193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17291367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049935106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04710555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36230624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399164710","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-323-95504-1.00033-8","title":"Semantic Transparency Norms","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Business; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.014264551250714507,"score_gpt":0.2780156440878573,"score_spread":0.26375109283714276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399164710","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017972062,0.0011387006,0.072197326,0.004033525,0.00047266204,0.000040265855,0.00048237853,0.00057657744,0.91926146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26406926,0.0040093493,0.06733905,0.0024042577,0.0016052691,0.00040276852,0.0034502419,0.0021855833,0.65453434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972915,0.000916473,0.0002252357,0.00043845555,0.0009869344,0.00014132282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977047,0.0011268525,0.00009595242,0.0005465494,0.00046559423,0.00006038136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022028196,0.00087310025,0.00060398824,0.0023664571,0.0021093676,0.009123908,0.0010422241,0.0022540533,0.060153633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007263672,0.00069274334,0.00056140276,0.002469008,0.005138536,0.0138434665,0.0026845273,0.0033303162,0.014057672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003978212,0.000005813596,0.000023690296,0.000022288406,0.0000015092448,0.000014093229,0.0003568467,0.00009450749,0.00008099296,0.96662,0.0129588125,0.01981755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032604994,0.0000024526673,0.00004443569,0.000060555183,0.0000032724333,0.000046682166,0.00017925045,0.0005500805,0.00023241749,0.854577,0.1442944,0.000006232557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036094717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030789403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060153633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026447098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018959823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20123392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399448969","doi":"","title":"Юрислінгвістика в епіцентрі західної науки: проблеми і перспективи","year":2022,"lang":"uk","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.2448914563529436,"score_gpt":0.596717935312,"score_spread":0.3518264789590564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399448969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014753324,0.015999226,0.036602795,0.029109135,0.0011085669,0.00007519209,0.0002448132,0.00016642195,0.9019405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7629403,0.01474822,0.040643603,0.0024817395,0.0011611164,0.00030747982,0.0002289317,0.00042200938,0.17706653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964154,0.0013532158,0.00015645819,0.0005533935,0.0011859888,0.00033550116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975841,0.0010827741,0.00021429709,0.0003054409,0.00060846226,0.00020480574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032719434,0.0005323904,0.00038785546,0.002221585,0.005086413,0.014514127,0.0009193553,0.003009186,0.018852828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006031604,0.0006496146,0.00043832336,0.0024129865,0.015203469,0.0077823694,0.002995126,0.0037900708,0.005358084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000826719,0.0000058104515,0.00024244425,0.000043700536,0.000002626254,0.000094689516,0.0032373886,0.00008131598,0.000116311814,0.9809545,0.004840063,0.010372777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011045644,0.000014317564,0.0013717244,0.00025739722,0.000013226209,0.0004231092,0.0040375097,0.00059586077,0.00045966913,0.6221771,0.37060595,0.000033070242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009081527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011706209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018852828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006605417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005813926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063068986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400424259","doi":"10.59704/ba3e9215b8eeb22e","title":"The Salience of “Writtenness” and “Unwrittenness” as Constitutional Categories in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Political science; Psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.007648189164577459,"score_gpt":0.2730482472402296,"score_spread":0.26540005807565215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400424259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37473872,0.0034111552,0.002857298,0.14404973,0.0004497307,0.00004945757,0.0015382703,0.000077995566,0.4728276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98251843,0.0007803065,0.00046172767,0.0028634062,0.000039168703,0.0000098931005,0.00013910966,0.000041573803,0.013146419],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99493295,0.0009218994,0.00013135668,0.0005158828,0.002118599,0.0013792614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98597646,0.006431593,0.00084693084,0.00043764157,0.0048139635,0.0014933108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037277157,0.00018297798,0.00035187192,0.0026702085,0.015474643,0.01784201,0.0011665963,0.0015474041,0.005936284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018466232,0.00026288343,0.00019530507,0.0064054383,0.023692878,0.003956542,0.0035351638,0.0037238873,0.00015456014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005373469,0.000014596734,0.013538332,0.00012340998,0.000018518782,0.00021036617,0.089286394,0.0006021507,0.0004946126,0.8300763,0.032809854,0.03277171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036545032,0.000023797164,0.11603298,0.000879983,0.00009006344,0.00013900746,0.22845589,0.0027077303,0.001747472,0.17491958,0.47469383,0.0002731864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9933964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99565876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12317457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12317457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14064632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8936982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400446843","doi":"10.59704/53f0a1f60dbaf402","title":"What are Principles and How Do They Work?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Computer science; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.03128466417495498,"score_gpt":0.31383600956083874,"score_spread":0.2825513453858838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400446843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017965348,0.023154898,0.09052937,0.3423522,0.0030898023,0.00033549865,0.00049402245,0.0006226694,0.52145624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7828285,0.02367955,0.1125336,0.036310427,0.0015610483,0.00093974656,0.0006024619,0.0015970404,0.039947614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94156796,0.03495991,0.0017351435,0.0049988404,0.011822729,0.0049153278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.937785,0.036241952,0.0048838495,0.005768171,0.011997792,0.003323183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.057352863,0.0012673216,0.0018115556,0.00508951,0.012137526,0.03063256,0.0051752087,0.0072039133,0.011204985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09906817,0.0013662968,0.0013725694,0.007084528,0.074102215,0.031366337,0.006422629,0.010942637,0.004272269],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014350078,0.000024205727,0.001608551,0.0003541081,0.000051418872,0.000049995975,0.010588773,0.00039274507,0.00009384818,0.93877566,0.013268257,0.034778085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025479549,0.000016731708,0.0014696122,0.00077470863,0.00003257417,0.00004222001,0.010565266,0.00038897363,0.00021561292,0.88257974,0.10384038,0.00004878429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.085206695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07761378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085206695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021281164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042236604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3033145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401019486","doi":"10.29173/alr2778","title":"Applying Purposive Textualism to Quebec's Codes","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory law; Law; Statute; Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Meaning (existential); Originalism; Legislative history; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; History; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.015256165037924315,"score_gpt":0.34488806233769,"score_spread":0.32963189729976566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401019486","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03358819,0.0041110767,0.09165305,0.08809319,0.0013444587,0.0002826435,0.0009726278,0.0003130151,0.7796418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8505013,0.0018057015,0.033991646,0.0075059356,0.00024233076,0.00034802567,0.00032991145,0.0001453809,0.105129905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920997,0.0035512038,0.00021929687,0.0008595946,0.0023903693,0.00087974354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988591,0.0051381662,0.00041816817,0.0011494006,0.004232901,0.00047041877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005878641,0.0005001549,0.0003066711,0.0021670773,0.012115272,0.01226578,0.0020546918,0.0023137422,0.0047295475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01595922,0.00029520356,0.0003826547,0.002909777,0.028629214,0.0030639556,0.002729841,0.003946417,0.00046311272],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051842526,0.0000031904974,0.00029127958,0.000025389276,0.0000021642406,0.00007559069,0.007715708,0.00034941203,0.000054665597,0.9768172,0.0065634674,0.008096804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019044961,0.000014706478,0.002128049,0.000424768,0.000017324764,0.0001160935,0.013042574,0.0034643072,0.0006589324,0.39935797,0.580696,0.00006018757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94845325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9563023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11497811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11497811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10711576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8342285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401652559","doi":"10.1515/9782763754376-017","title":"THE CHARTER OF THE FRENCH LANGUAGE IN THE MEDIA: CONSTITUTIONAL POLITICS, JUDICIALIZATION, AND SENTIMENT ANALYSIS","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.009183116780741527,"score_gpt":0.26958989898919905,"score_spread":0.26040678220845753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401652559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014118538,0.098782144,0.012588619,0.10207936,0.005576271,0.0000937551,0.0029751586,0.00032415288,0.763462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4962799,0.06147694,0.014273979,0.013170225,0.007515907,0.0002707404,0.00233904,0.00058952306,0.4040838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984394,0.0007141555,0.000033070635,0.000118698816,0.00052505505,0.00016969645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835396,0.0008187039,0.00007843338,0.00005026994,0.00062471605,0.00007394053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023099147,0.00055176346,0.00035496743,0.00401906,0.0039024055,0.008445998,0.0003679249,0.0012720992,0.0062296493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003023326,0.00024207677,0.00029382965,0.004695826,0.0060482784,0.0029400033,0.0005886133,0.0017805877,0.0010148155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023605613,0.000010162151,0.00086199254,0.00017874557,0.000010635298,0.00011626505,0.008631249,0.00020940497,0.00056602224,0.55151355,0.34412265,0.09375579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005505766,0.000008952496,0.007118111,0.00046218224,0.000010918178,0.000104898165,0.004685028,0.0005103767,0.0005253193,0.045663167,0.94087446,0.000031095493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37057963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44363335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6294204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021171309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010598918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73684525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401652585","doi":"10.1515/9782763754376-012","title":"JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION OF THE CHARTER OF THE FRENCH LANGUAGE COLLECTIVE RIGHTS VERSUS INDIVIDUAL LIBERTIES","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Law; Judicial interpretation; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.01800542786944597,"score_gpt":0.2634213897441681,"score_spread":0.24541596187472214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401652585","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038583775,0.009588717,0.0023733005,0.03162322,0.001632898,0.000032093754,0.00024202446,0.00006712935,0.95058227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3837577,0.0074060713,0.0028963166,0.022531047,0.002010655,0.00016740515,0.00035831815,0.00018434298,0.5806882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99430895,0.002168621,0.000098192555,0.00043110945,0.001791384,0.0012017438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790645,0.00090891344,0.000083937215,0.0001193957,0.0009089325,0.00007233722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044133724,0.0006169904,0.0005922531,0.0019745259,0.009013104,0.009666943,0.0012796152,0.0054327296,0.007087329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051114685,0.00034611268,0.00060350023,0.0017200623,0.011102583,0.0017095,0.0011398499,0.0061786054,0.0011258883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004181004,0.0000034689224,0.000034014887,0.000012223249,0.0000018617789,0.000047524987,0.0012628257,0.000091515736,0.000064420135,0.93318695,0.061862297,0.0034287523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021573682,0.000014625687,0.0012045642,0.00032992454,0.000014268419,0.000081385544,0.0015878464,0.00062742416,0.00050353224,0.12918168,0.86638194,0.000051285377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67764086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7051866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32235914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044364154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03415012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6485151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401655299","doi":"10.1515/9782763754376-016","title":"LANGUAGE AS A TECHNOLOGY OF POWER: AN INTERSECTIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE CHARTER OF THE FRENCH LANGUAGE","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Linguistics; Power (physics); Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Physics; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.005861244065032835,"score_gpt":0.2747932504854603,"score_spread":0.26893200642042747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401655299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019625084,0.0059458506,0.013039819,0.006715157,0.00011544499,0.000035250734,0.000105917876,0.000047984584,0.9543695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9045892,0.002729111,0.0067773047,0.0006088935,0.00020464779,0.000106983185,0.0001490879,0.00013841616,0.08469646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957793,0.0024816135,0.00004814116,0.0002485006,0.00080645306,0.00063596683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983896,0.0008623255,0.00011768525,0.00010715242,0.00041867173,0.00010447766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021624938,0.00061709445,0.0005023714,0.0048919357,0.008557121,0.01500282,0.0009720891,0.0015483747,0.0077278297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002855323,0.00025898436,0.000660955,0.0060822475,0.025936462,0.008059006,0.002540791,0.0023738085,0.0006580408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003002627,0.0000018909176,0.00006933745,0.000007899137,0.0000012931304,0.000032849228,0.008551902,0.000065132415,0.000024051009,0.98713964,0.001395581,0.0027074139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010304241,0.000025050018,0.0029310484,0.0002920635,0.000021679272,0.00020223616,0.040383328,0.0015206599,0.0003408172,0.6011412,0.35309428,0.000037395817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14875615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15786946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85124385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029484171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010540911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2957806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407286278","doi":"","title":"Droits linguistiques et aménagement des langues","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.014887124016038599,"score_gpt":0.2782168655519212,"score_spread":0.2633297415358826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407286278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054083113,0.01618751,0.0088768825,0.0075785774,0.0010310117,0.000016974614,0.0002244057,0.00019576185,0.9604806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26886445,0.01587659,0.004742442,0.0011338877,0.0029794467,0.00010536031,0.00046574435,0.0005347389,0.7052973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990577,0.0005387376,0.00002847129,0.000085946915,0.00020042573,0.00008874935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994765,0.00028992604,0.000024404431,0.0000698033,0.000106412364,0.000032959106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000778977,0.0008218991,0.0006859809,0.0019713372,0.003911062,0.007718428,0.00061121734,0.0015697171,0.023198357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001896893,0.00042125533,0.00043954284,0.002232081,0.0064775655,0.00439528,0.0015441101,0.0041152374,0.005683198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012437553,0.0000058242235,0.00004258418,0.000035552363,0.0000027498518,0.000040916344,0.0027864792,0.00015643696,0.00018321561,0.9643569,0.020056374,0.012320544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007601393,0.000010631828,0.00030246086,0.00009044797,0.0000059448466,0.00012096825,0.0014701828,0.00066460914,0.0001972126,0.200793,0.7963242,0.000012740564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04916973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028481727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04916973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060608964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022687064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097767055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411656885","doi":"10.51847/ueth4fss92","title":"10.51847/UETH4Fss92","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.005670046911103396,"score_gpt":0.2309536359093813,"score_spread":0.2252835889982779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411656885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001004829,0.0005079683,0.0015059527,0.00091663736,0.0006832446,0.00006879824,0.0010584852,0.0008837176,0.9933703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024891556,0.0002107004,0.00062467327,0.0002048592,0.00007042486,0.000025727282,0.00049727387,0.0002067207,0.99567056],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993536,0.00009676943,0.000066655266,0.0001630021,0.0001966518,0.00012322163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986094,0.0003181871,0.00006699353,0.00027246345,0.00047319353,0.0002596274],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001091816,0.0012809413,0.00072886224,0.0023943742,0.0016809658,0.004526682,0.0013713731,0.0040621837,0.9704418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021057262,0.00046573975,0.00069535477,0.0025389728,0.0012365456,0.0034255222,0.0027122537,0.0012427357,0.9624115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020345773,0.00011099764,0.00096819724,0.00034905996,0.000014791641,0.00030567482,0.00023804183,0.00027409135,0.0022347944,0.013944907,0.27891183,0.7024443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016811542,0.000028460408,0.00056252145,0.00016281017,0.000006794103,0.00019993342,0.00013286913,0.00021286902,0.00048003357,0.0017580079,0.99642783,0.00001100534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003940822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038408905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029558182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012610296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070688303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042161047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412253693","doi":"","title":"Law and Language in Scandinavia","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.046249176382934805,"score_gpt":0.327911754766447,"score_spread":0.2816625783835122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412253693","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71814203,0.024137983,0.00033213606,0.012120512,0.00038482723,0.000022582215,0.00034027811,0.00003739782,0.24448225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933308,0.0015510087,0.0001360305,0.00036710795,0.000034498786,0.000015369951,0.00007396379,0.00001138752,0.004480008],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99112296,0.0049388628,0.00062996265,0.00073610945,0.00060514314,0.0019669011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994255,0.0031745005,0.0010027981,0.00022515377,0.0007989317,0.0005435158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034729736,0.00059353077,0.00077447563,0.0038318357,0.010613093,0.012585346,0.00086608087,0.0042470386,0.0066808537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006776844,0.00064694835,0.00035924313,0.0062424806,0.014991769,0.0035625903,0.004651115,0.0019301799,0.000545554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071928016,0.000295957,0.056780316,0.0013407712,0.00013735401,0.0084399255,0.4403685,0.0017350719,0.002222955,0.4007605,0.0142235365,0.07297573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019560361,0.0003886564,0.25683397,0.0062938174,0.0002025714,0.0022759214,0.44195843,0.0010647733,0.0007475458,0.06563364,0.2241329,0.00027228316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10892993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20375924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10892993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008989102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01572416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21659178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412317208","doi":"","title":"Justifying the evidential use of intuitive judgements in linguistics","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Psychology; Evidentiality; Natural language processing; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04315366923613121,"score_gpt":0.35187087168632986,"score_spread":0.3087172024501986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412317208","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054974455,0.0036113036,0.69854873,0.069581166,0.0021999974,0.00018201582,0.0004896178,0.00051028526,0.16990241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92362875,0.0005997246,0.06762427,0.0033650326,0.0014538028,0.00014942868,0.00012361495,0.00017741998,0.0028779285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9451468,0.035665397,0.0039773243,0.0045933644,0.009030173,0.0015868801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8144495,0.14350931,0.007380384,0.019961184,0.013115371,0.0015842221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049533308,0.0011442711,0.0018577036,0.0048980745,0.0042850184,0.009479913,0.005039969,0.00931186,0.007777856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17901845,0.0018549468,0.0020199625,0.0024030313,0.033467215,0.021359118,0.008451975,0.009891775,0.0010308969],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030766765,0.000012293549,0.00024359892,0.00009645339,0.000031852516,0.000073916926,0.0007754584,0.0005953609,0.00010608092,0.9934837,0.0011695491,0.0033809054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014559855,0.000005489869,0.0001266894,0.000051963183,0.000011208671,0.00003305303,0.0000920557,0.0016906933,0.00013314023,0.9957841,0.0020460777,0.0000110109595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024520562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030034946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049533308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004506666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033829664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26196033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416037236","doi":"10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.5","title":"JUDGEBERT: Assessing Legal Meaning Preservation Between Sentences","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Université Laval","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Sentence; Interpretation (philosophy); Term (time); Semantics (computer science)","score_opus":0.02408618950152515,"score_gpt":0.36051252911151105,"score_spread":0.3364263396099859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416037236","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6337146,0.008859635,0.13884564,0.0016274003,0.0011661898,0.0024714244,0.13206324,0.024628391,0.056623396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55066276,0.0011840662,0.15462828,0.0005944293,0.00029738774,0.0017367835,0.27982405,0.0014669857,0.009605313],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927933,0.0020361012,0.0010385028,0.0011279556,0.0027491774,0.00025500357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97802585,0.011363179,0.0024451204,0.0032027224,0.0043649008,0.0005982547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045039286,0.0013270716,0.0007063427,0.009014066,0.0017353855,0.0027171425,0.0011509061,0.0017498162,0.00423381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037053447,0.00019232888,0.0007745627,0.0032253296,0.0013908427,0.00406505,0.0030976303,0.0011987123,0.0023932322],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014486649,0.0007335465,0.09417819,0.006428016,0.0008091089,0.0015449751,0.0065893508,0.014690055,0.039204743,0.015293702,0.2372353,0.58184445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046066137,0.0014708431,0.22898842,0.0014386747,0.00067699346,0.00402854,0.007859979,0.14904545,0.074092165,0.027553694,0.5038611,0.00052340695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008027684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016757552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009014066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014179973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019943803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023819387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417500595","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197777497.013.0006","title":"Constitutions and Election Laws","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Election law; Politics; Scholarship; Identification (biology); Work (physics); Dispute resolution","score_opus":0.013433043735706455,"score_gpt":0.23671829579348197,"score_spread":0.22328525205777552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417500595","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057693142,0.00603691,0.0059039136,0.00799532,0.00046044076,0.000043768843,0.00015381118,0.000067434456,0.9735692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6644737,0.0068114973,0.0064900094,0.0047325008,0.0010424363,0.0002844288,0.0006278155,0.00012086793,0.31541672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974275,0.0010705595,0.00015239992,0.00035687443,0.000710528,0.00028202165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792033,0.001216676,0.0001501875,0.00029013076,0.00034724534,0.000075455224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028431718,0.00021408159,0.0003044513,0.0015807322,0.002864985,0.0047577983,0.00071117375,0.0015648364,0.016103411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062126606,0.00026180164,0.00023544945,0.0011977684,0.010302021,0.002823061,0.0018697922,0.0028193186,0.0017717715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.8129597e-7,0.0000013203742,0.000021566115,0.000005514923,3.1145785e-7,0.00000404919,0.00022759476,0.00006398616,0.000010637189,0.9958359,0.0018969261,0.0019314052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007595441,0.00001060681,0.00050555577,0.0002024247,0.0000032458959,0.00003043457,0.00045380736,0.00025755534,0.0001222186,0.42498624,0.573412,0.000008233874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005510784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004642073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016103411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035167397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027770677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053871274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987618578","doi":"","title":"Translation between Internationalization and Localization","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internationalization; Unification; Lingua franca; Politics; Field (mathematics); Legal translation","score_opus":0.2479318286523233,"score_gpt":0.584139530070581,"score_spread":0.3362077014182576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987618578","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011191761,0.019051474,0.019259755,0.085688934,0.0077839065,0.000052098192,0.0003127442,0.00013544402,0.8565239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8322991,0.018233297,0.00934468,0.017772114,0.0051580467,0.00017185905,0.00041721365,0.00044658032,0.116157025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99365413,0.003892853,0.0002693335,0.0007354562,0.00088474643,0.0005634594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961033,0.0018774448,0.00029486298,0.0006300953,0.00093349896,0.00016091696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003676587,0.0007197219,0.0004407915,0.0014503954,0.0038081212,0.006852447,0.0007775438,0.002388602,0.009813982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071089044,0.00020153787,0.00034968284,0.0025565992,0.022724792,0.006802994,0.003377009,0.005470629,0.0019184237],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007706936,0.00000278251,0.00006996594,0.000049384664,0.0000016942087,0.000060930008,0.00583479,0.000035366138,0.00009327231,0.9802404,0.007561783,0.0060420516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009641356,0.000021038466,0.00065591646,0.0004586574,0.0000064534775,0.00027039787,0.009004629,0.00020573866,0.0003760508,0.3074544,0.6815183,0.000018752084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018603671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010724346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018603671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008529398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006279628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061885357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989345708","doi":"","title":"Are machine learning corpora “fair dealing” under Canadian law?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UWSpace (University of Waterloo)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Key (lock); Training set; Machine translation; Training (meteorology)","score_opus":0.01472327995228694,"score_gpt":0.2173807952109115,"score_spread":0.20265751525862455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989345708","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1477482,0.020369308,0.15381001,0.3134088,0.0051663173,0.0008189502,0.02941377,0.0026764874,0.32658815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83576244,0.0071020587,0.08032048,0.02527059,0.0020686497,0.0007313236,0.01860577,0.001250707,0.028887993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94044095,0.02063299,0.0027269672,0.0062151104,0.02534842,0.0046355827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84281546,0.068039365,0.010465655,0.025295531,0.050016917,0.0033671788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.057528224,0.0010777797,0.0013035026,0.010104098,0.0167876,0.020854041,0.006508381,0.004334923,0.00887063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24731605,0.0011653461,0.0009949039,0.020195289,0.017658874,0.017386593,0.0060400795,0.0053585386,0.0016730266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026173764,0.0001282196,0.03486884,0.00054226554,0.00031033732,0.00042117113,0.0072437176,0.009794186,0.0009917691,0.58497566,0.15322839,0.2072337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018152448,0.000060014292,0.037482664,0.0017203242,0.00023001443,0.0004586706,0.009059478,0.03619816,0.004527996,0.4127717,0.4969163,0.000393142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84877545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8959235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15122455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047111917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07273168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34182245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989773348","doi":"","title":"Canadian Law Dictionary","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Citation; Source document; Legal document; Jurisprudence; Legal research","score_opus":0.008302208825228462,"score_gpt":0.2512596954620358,"score_spread":0.24295748663680733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989773348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036929856,0.011018907,0.0021763537,0.009324556,0.0027681522,0.00017999341,0.025189428,0.0008977217,0.9480756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006830072,0.018872088,0.0048852325,0.004055695,0.00051781564,0.0001718495,0.019176539,0.0006782399,0.94481254],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99518,0.00019981887,0.00020237335,0.00039072672,0.0036067662,0.00042034753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910643,0.00044873706,0.00015949109,0.00037001676,0.007531114,0.0004263772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016456916,0.0009896721,0.0011069309,0.011419928,0.01042509,0.010441238,0.0039046842,0.002288719,0.28131095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008998091,0.0006665127,0.0005986671,0.02148639,0.0026403528,0.0038689352,0.0019200114,0.0030764926,0.11598837],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040725236,0.0000041571307,0.000093004994,0.000110807814,0.0000016500463,0.00004148934,0.00028497603,0.000058491052,0.000037315684,0.03725872,0.9190298,0.043075573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.525996e-7,5.284449e-7,0.000106516345,0.00007199672,8.9602725e-7,0.000019314206,0.00007372383,0.000018361467,0.000008995964,0.0007945198,0.99890006,0.0000042709503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88765746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92540115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28131095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045884058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10108134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94107884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995944433","doi":"","title":"Professor Kate Glover Berger to join Osgoode faculty July 1 - Osgoode Hall Law School","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Join (topology); Focus (optics); Public law","score_opus":0.027923818787593306,"score_gpt":0.311179873882283,"score_spread":0.2832560550946897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995944433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060120816,0.009295262,0.0006814839,0.26604643,0.021581294,0.00021355637,0.000611301,0.0006430853,0.6949155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0056048953,0.000802873,0.00019692593,0.008571974,0.0006679006,0.000025896079,0.00009145827,0.000060021684,0.983978],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998458,0.0001863695,0.000044193373,0.00031062283,0.0005319733,0.00046885654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969592,0.00017817279,0.00008281871,0.00011262474,0.0006705076,0.0019966448],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020299435,0.00048505157,0.0003633174,0.00093722495,0.008074119,0.0059150434,0.00089722394,0.0054644085,0.32507402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035692423,0.00057247374,0.00031895505,0.00051733584,0.001874536,0.0031077124,0.0036174394,0.0054270797,0.078752324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009766148,0.00002529532,0.00023987747,0.000012696986,6.503916e-7,0.00007885418,0.00013826479,0.0000075545577,0.00009055052,0.005413722,0.9837055,0.010277172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038729754,0.000009520567,0.000554011,0.000034014305,6.2795294e-7,0.000031126034,0.00027417426,0.000011695283,0.00007398389,0.00045858175,0.99854326,0.0000052405853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024269884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09274341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32507402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061988006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009815807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001479785","doi":"","title":"Justin Trudeau News - What experts say Canada needs to do to become a leader in the electric vehicle industry","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Electric vehicle; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Automotive industry","score_opus":0.016855414931219233,"score_gpt":0.2987752596716087,"score_spread":0.28191984474038945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001479785","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006817449,0.0051654875,0.00015468747,0.56686497,0.02386587,0.000055952703,0.001664918,0.0002339551,0.40131247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004698949,0.0028188261,0.00015209262,0.098027036,0.003044952,0.00003512816,0.0004489994,0.00018894055,0.89058506],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976775,0.00013879199,0.000055651144,0.00015715962,0.0012582385,0.00071268727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933035,0.001265044,0.0001680759,0.00013144355,0.00340977,0.001722175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015328242,0.0005693416,0.000652107,0.001168665,0.008543293,0.010816535,0.0016032845,0.016223826,0.103670225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008229962,0.00041392114,0.00045444217,0.0014528282,0.002289663,0.0032855792,0.0016069693,0.010038437,0.03158578],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002667155,0.0000026312593,0.0000465932,0.000011221156,5.3989294e-7,0.000024911777,0.00003886782,0.000006036768,0.000012193978,0.0022169917,0.99559927,0.0020380274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045210945,0.0000016905379,0.00039864256,0.00007722549,0.0000024042333,0.0000134631455,0.00045677795,0.000026562448,0.000040828625,0.00057247624,0.998396,0.000009538873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7877131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8692263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21228689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015209097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04856411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42707413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001960747","doi":"","title":"<em>Chevron</em> Abroad","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Chevron (anatomy); Agency (philosophy); Statutory law; Statute; Normative; Judicial review; Doctrine","score_opus":0.014084014311995604,"score_gpt":0.2774109907753754,"score_spread":0.26332697646337977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001960747","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34420457,0.0030262729,0.0029579122,0.008055321,0.00014829304,0.00007159379,0.0002290794,0.000111826484,0.64119506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93864876,0.0007280401,0.0009560265,0.0022736806,0.000017369828,0.000043570522,0.0000930135,0.00006753163,0.057172023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967673,0.0017788073,0.00007367904,0.00035628653,0.00048615836,0.00053785014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965077,0.0015974584,0.00064618257,0.000361298,0.0007115051,0.0001758827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026060308,0.00014813649,0.00020698436,0.0010053369,0.0029593178,0.0043373443,0.000492329,0.0015131163,0.0146849165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006280652,0.00012594277,0.00021379009,0.00169679,0.0025381674,0.0018588373,0.0014684792,0.0013399905,0.001770947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020421512,0.00015406823,0.024468344,0.0003790154,0.000059087626,0.0016437887,0.05022094,0.0015622181,0.0040935576,0.68309766,0.048867494,0.18524966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005398322,0.00013882609,0.09364479,0.00049311854,0.000084434185,0.00096761814,0.04489844,0.0024993618,0.00806214,0.030890664,0.81817394,0.00009272715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03329546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054229926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03329546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003999938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026297572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066203296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7002401438","doi":"","title":"9781315436258_oachapterB2.pdf","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Key (lock); Constructed language; English language; Plain language","score_opus":0.01708223632627203,"score_gpt":0.31705862116455064,"score_spread":0.2999763848382786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7002401438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019403965,0.0018925456,0.0009947818,0.0008048601,0.0009266079,0.00004617909,0.0017241966,0.0006203338,0.9927965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018367106,0.0028475204,0.0012167171,0.00034825536,0.00032867858,0.00008903963,0.0015775218,0.00075804605,0.99099755],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995579,0.00005567012,0.00002303866,0.000052968226,0.00026127108,0.000049128943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992256,0.00021217346,0.00005473476,0.00011513327,0.00026941215,0.00012279786],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040651165,0.0008206532,0.0005196017,0.0028307175,0.0015152625,0.006990311,0.00090049685,0.0013754717,0.7019439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002315287,0.0004211164,0.00043792324,0.004465333,0.0007640685,0.0035216894,0.0028729392,0.0020689003,0.5567975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015418085,0.000032844237,0.00009845029,0.00029291582,0.0000022837567,0.00007164373,0.00028824247,0.000090306465,0.00021032416,0.018489912,0.82962084,0.15078677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011961451,0.000002724698,0.00009335687,0.00012985533,4.968726e-7,0.000031687807,0.000062506,0.000015639382,0.000046036723,0.0011395637,0.9984748,0.0000021703888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033965332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060600317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29805613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013342351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013585084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42514086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009329682","doi":"","title":"Documents and studies on 19th c. monetary history.: International monetary conferences. [2], Republication of Report of the Royal Commission on International Coinage together with the Minutes of Evidence and Appendix (London, 1868)","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Royal Commission; Index (typography); Commission; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.04131673459687574,"score_gpt":0.27222976922102526,"score_spread":0.23091303462414953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009329682","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020455539,0.52396333,0.00069223234,0.029038005,0.023093654,0.00014351877,0.050802946,0.00024697173,0.36997375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05027394,0.3306788,0.0019356644,0.005541619,0.013259827,0.0010668657,0.042349804,0.0007542842,0.55413926],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990533,0.000120126824,0.00009053771,0.000117034404,0.00047170353,0.00014730125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998808,0.00033805767,0.0003225975,0.00009599406,0.00034070163,0.000094729505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014975978,0.002056974,0.000893038,0.009097895,0.0018385332,0.0043586227,0.0015062927,0.002163947,0.07225944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059072208,0.0004988099,0.00050149806,0.01911935,0.00092096184,0.0031772496,0.0016689379,0.002902563,0.01957271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056094264,0.000017271603,0.00030728552,0.0005853943,0.0000065167637,0.00004069798,0.00029688812,0.00007304338,0.0000644071,0.018328499,0.93404865,0.04617521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008153514,0.0000072596836,0.0057164063,0.0009039511,0.000004673118,0.00003421909,0.00019120217,0.00002926858,0.00008859672,0.0026273248,0.99038154,0.0000074514433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044981077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06992914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07225944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072162207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057596266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24173194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7026855105","doi":"","title":"Best of the Best: North shore athletes honoured","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Diafiltration; Liquation; Dysgeusia; Triacetin; Fusible alloy; Emperipolesis","score_opus":0.007456269102237447,"score_gpt":0.19736285244595536,"score_spread":0.1899065833437179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7026855105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006267004,0.007093016,0.00032521208,0.32334492,0.062290426,0.000048292288,0.0002526566,0.00022277675,0.6001557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021865377,0.0025455942,0.0003175021,0.04972004,0.0042667473,0.00003333978,0.00013751551,0.00027528993,0.92083865],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960538,0.0007734754,0.000102060236,0.000321684,0.0013046032,0.0014442845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952893,0.00025424955,0.00016155538,0.00021547938,0.0013868157,0.002692501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022986608,0.00059956184,0.00061242323,0.000979577,0.02028395,0.013733502,0.0011358876,0.0048758667,0.10167051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068327505,0.00060385873,0.00035549115,0.0009958716,0.004019877,0.0058265105,0.009109168,0.0068972637,0.040029928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007301329,0.000009204902,0.0003140981,0.000014361869,0.0000013768479,0.000108205546,0.0018043799,0.000004107213,0.00003120346,0.0026698443,0.98374325,0.011292748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028983602,0.0000068913464,0.0010595263,0.000109569075,0.000002260856,0.00013468902,0.010429347,0.000007252396,0.000026081761,0.0008641769,0.9873476,0.000009647529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05618393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25015226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94381607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034355153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009262538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34012175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027558605","doi":"","title":"De l'interprétation des textes législatifs plurilingues : Comparaison d'études portant sur la jurisprudence en Suisse, au Canada et dans l'Union européenne","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); Freedom of information","score_opus":0.0072905335967546935,"score_gpt":0.24466376446908578,"score_spread":0.2373732308723311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027558605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4025892,0.015371001,0.13230911,0.014260491,0.0005861481,0.0007732921,0.001540125,0.00044892592,0.43212172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93116957,0.0046122,0.03721089,0.0008243589,0.00015438792,0.000453698,0.0008126262,0.0004671832,0.024295013],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95352614,0.030994305,0.0012982077,0.0028641294,0.010222214,0.0010949116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9309345,0.04968135,0.0030643118,0.0046320898,0.011184025,0.00050375005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031589054,0.0006756358,0.0009602074,0.006208099,0.005870518,0.017719999,0.0017886703,0.0016321245,0.008900672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.073783584,0.00061242643,0.00080104975,0.009872772,0.018293593,0.007393741,0.003950944,0.0036895894,0.0010160141],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027422173,0.00008293152,0.015798822,0.0014422846,0.00016886153,0.00024343196,0.42343107,0.0013039439,0.0027343011,0.38928747,0.0057183444,0.15951446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013719095,0.00017972957,0.082294896,0.004445835,0.00042220805,0.0005743771,0.3158542,0.007397919,0.0118830595,0.10237143,0.47409445,0.00034470134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20145878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23682198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7985412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021112662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02805082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4005723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029556294","doi":"","title":"La formation professionnelle et technique au Québec : un aperçu","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"other","venue":"Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Term (time); Work (physics); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.011255985159624103,"score_gpt":0.26211549941562473,"score_spread":0.2508595142560006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029556294","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06002585,0.28001004,0.008309348,0.13602601,0.005407664,0.00021671569,0.0067121536,0.0008619759,0.50243026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31437162,0.123042405,0.009751917,0.0067710537,0.0016369465,0.00017818224,0.0030066934,0.00052741595,0.5407138],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961986,0.0006801609,0.00015644715,0.0003847959,0.0018408058,0.0007391739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99359894,0.0012572531,0.0004249111,0.00035313857,0.0035211425,0.0008446104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037784008,0.0011018467,0.00062910083,0.007392978,0.007922583,0.009983018,0.0017729696,0.0027333251,0.037180442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007885412,0.00046129792,0.0006542216,0.015360444,0.0052881595,0.0036133393,0.0020088684,0.0029859461,0.001914275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009387424,0.00015771855,0.013388837,0.00074956036,0.000057076784,0.00047737555,0.006403102,0.0013354613,0.0006219602,0.23719451,0.3069184,0.43260205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015194119,0.000021046959,0.03743498,0.0010572036,0.000026462018,0.00020312356,0.0048191077,0.0008378548,0.00035905003,0.0055188835,0.94964993,0.000057172078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99284357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99291575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88884944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11115054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16567722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8064574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043065087","doi":"","title":"Reforming the advocacy rules in Canadian charity law: Legislative amendments, judicial action or administrative discretion?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Legislature; Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Limiting; Action (physics); Revenue; Doctrine","score_opus":0.05495224973657405,"score_gpt":0.34712228113445076,"score_spread":0.29217003139787673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043065087","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06968169,0.005727772,0.009601448,0.21121733,0.0012079278,0.00014501237,0.00019978164,0.00009619457,0.7021228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9417095,0.0023365829,0.004216363,0.017847627,0.00036355207,0.000081556616,0.00006775811,0.00006194278,0.03331526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98109376,0.003815676,0.0005860126,0.0017261526,0.007287737,0.005490553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98450536,0.005982906,0.0014934082,0.0011407827,0.005676542,0.0012009661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015575419,0.00039760105,0.0006755325,0.0024700488,0.020302039,0.020384649,0.003454935,0.005536204,0.0060418067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035572197,0.0007602546,0.00063450995,0.0029459693,0.043306176,0.0068026977,0.0038876904,0.010190309,0.0006064779],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006798423,0.000010964687,0.00046173143,0.00002429008,0.0000037933473,0.000038189835,0.0075075105,0.00016912594,0.00011208486,0.9806294,0.005341141,0.0056948457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012695107,0.000032733587,0.010065463,0.00089664635,0.000088506196,0.00009473269,0.026829727,0.0019855716,0.0009711405,0.47136837,0.4872796,0.0002604333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93313277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94365096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10923908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10923908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18864894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7925887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043896981","doi":"","title":"Thermodynamics and crystal chemistry of rhomboclase, (H<sub>5</sub>O<sub>2</sub>)Fe(SO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>·2H<sub>2</sub>O, and the phase (H<sub>3</sub>O)Fe(SO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub> and implications for acid mine drainage","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Crystal (programming language); Acid mine drainage; Phase (matter); Crystal chemistry; Crystal structure; Chemical thermodynamics; Drainage","score_opus":0.016291463030414784,"score_gpt":0.2677770103862502,"score_spread":0.2514855473558354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043896981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98133767,0.00057411916,0.0011278419,0.0009445827,0.000032558015,0.0000137939005,0.00046392405,0.000031731764,0.015473814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99798155,0.00012784355,0.0001772513,0.000017651555,0.0000055881533,0.0000060422285,0.00010990176,0.000008879985,0.0015652879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997397,0.000051428717,0.000014766324,0.00005527318,0.00009177809,0.000047073627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993123,0.00036318525,0.00010075053,0.000061101986,0.00011861014,0.000044004948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005570698,0.00008892459,0.00018283007,0.0005347583,0.00064751395,0.0012107141,0.000601873,0.00048091318,0.0066426545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029148739,0.00028324264,0.00016296328,0.00030005342,0.0013538754,0.0010031683,0.0004665342,0.00046754078,0.00033188492],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010734621,0.00041390603,0.09135898,0.0008791386,0.00009407036,0.0006075698,0.0023496037,0.077298544,0.19327186,0.5835306,0.011109475,0.03801284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024328548,0.00032103245,0.32799232,0.00006736853,0.000043093783,0.00044945758,0.0038643058,0.12503162,0.17520475,0.3382535,0.02836402,0.00016525963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026120983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030274117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026120983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002509498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001308063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051937878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100433106","doi":"","title":"Rpr1, a gene required for Rpg1-dependent resistance to stem rust in barley. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 113: 847–855","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stem rust; Puccinia; Gene; Chromosome; Plant disease resistance; Mutation; Genetic analysis","score_opus":0.008469476422918402,"score_gpt":0.27089277437350484,"score_spread":0.26242329795058644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100433106","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96301514,0.0054762624,0.009720139,0.00041770807,0.00022880035,0.00011736528,0.015925415,0.001163279,0.003935874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9545767,0.001804126,0.007871948,0.00014666047,0.00004919393,0.0000951274,0.02357762,0.00030473413,0.011573874],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998845,0.000008405665,0.000007467659,0.00004450105,0.00003503543,0.000020044368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9999101,0.000011893812,0.000031631742,0.000006413551,0.000012402984,0.000027631957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000076042415,0.0006415295,0.00044483895,0.00038159665,0.000239819,0.0003359266,0.00028421645,0.00026570816,0.0026911383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000099088174,0.00023443025,0.000315935,0.00028732652,0.00023188398,0.00015390836,0.00016305638,0.00047194932,0.0018939674],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057541234,0.000007918143,0.00012014464,0.000032140066,0.0000023814334,0.00006864202,0.000008414138,0.0000343559,0.99822146,0.000036073103,0.00011298402,0.0012979088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008253799,0.00025603126,0.081047885,0.000049087823,0.000055602683,0.001548211,0.00010909372,0.0019519422,0.8955136,0.00030309756,0.019054286,0.000028648818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002122745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001566011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026911383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007386689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027945646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009002805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7113426770","doi":"","title":"Finance for the Common Good","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Capital (architecture); Function (biology); Capital market; Financial capital; Quarter (Canadian coin); Economic capital","score_opus":0.011454442311130507,"score_gpt":0.29601153846518924,"score_spread":0.2845570961540587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7113426770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055985996,0.009463895,0.0028219435,0.1735468,0.0017037205,0.000029307728,0.000110352186,0.00007324812,0.8066521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5497464,0.0057148165,0.002499873,0.07449092,0.003542968,0.00015766463,0.00013215376,0.00012851055,0.36358678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791163,0.00080538855,0.000045877554,0.00027922602,0.00054022984,0.0004176436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910766,0.0003269393,0.000083598774,0.00013116523,0.00018963435,0.00016097988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022606226,0.00041198143,0.00028166862,0.0009479703,0.006619775,0.0064703985,0.00047747503,0.0064661414,0.017591959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047087385,0.00015379098,0.0003596079,0.00047877556,0.012672577,0.005622185,0.0028241284,0.005878223,0.0023846624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021189474,0.0000026777166,0.000056329947,0.000004852544,6.1303575e-7,0.000015203204,0.0002345488,0.000020334961,0.000020042678,0.97250664,0.025098704,0.0020379352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008451349,0.000011643734,0.0006169294,0.00012682809,0.0000034321592,0.000077561075,0.0006262778,0.00020251886,0.000121957055,0.37824163,0.6199522,0.00001055465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02089093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021831963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02089093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073198853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008032869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058850944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7118817543","doi":"10.54389/bfea8387","title":"A Right to Explanation for Algorithmic Credit Decisions in the UK","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"˜The œproceedings of sliit international conference on advancements in science and humanities","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Transparency (behavior); Process (computing); Accountability; Statutory law; Financial services; Credit card; Misrepresentation","score_opus":0.0492433805445838,"score_gpt":0.3656328452474607,"score_spread":0.3163894647028769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7118817543","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036052063,0.005783439,0.029884355,0.58721185,0.0031224643,0.0002056568,0.00045367552,0.0003125275,0.33697402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76932406,0.0019244639,0.008502515,0.14291856,0.0016671437,0.0002632108,0.00018784222,0.000121310826,0.07509083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97231334,0.012647446,0.0025527866,0.0027471243,0.0057809795,0.003958357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93343484,0.045418907,0.005386147,0.007137609,0.006164275,0.0024582492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02028376,0.0003949742,0.00072521926,0.0009305763,0.006103547,0.012607355,0.0021937026,0.027483033,0.015308295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08416457,0.0006958592,0.00087504194,0.00090777496,0.02435413,0.010756772,0.009768204,0.015476596,0.0043830774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042510506,0.000027096985,0.0009593851,0.000048533384,0.0000045096263,0.00054899923,0.003970936,0.00044191288,0.00012613852,0.9408112,0.04199855,0.011020226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010734455,0.000054542947,0.0016836139,0.0005117792,0.000013585581,0.00059848983,0.0013947004,0.00249907,0.000545124,0.6356269,0.35682616,0.00013870171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033557642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021076113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033557642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0092805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014365089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10727203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125757963","doi":"10.1515/9781773855196-081","title":"9.7 Why ‘Liberal’ and ‘Conservative’ Are Unhelpful Terms in Canadian Courts","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation; Work (physics); Subject (documents); Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.017089426874906537,"score_gpt":0.21724890911765773,"score_spread":0.2001594822427512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125757963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014318353,0.006334684,0.0014692688,0.08628585,0.000787452,0.000037145106,0.00034230333,0.000059853384,0.890365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5401859,0.0033790492,0.002738017,0.035663202,0.00039336982,0.00006394532,0.00021492159,0.00016136063,0.41720015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99155676,0.001178227,0.00012519707,0.00045124127,0.0035500084,0.003138604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99659735,0.0007553954,0.00012844709,0.0001469875,0.0019934908,0.0003783311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028015117,0.0005180464,0.00036015373,0.0019716055,0.020052046,0.01361987,0.0017648453,0.0065914607,0.01632603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008022943,0.0004941047,0.00050014845,0.0027549015,0.020151675,0.004153616,0.00254819,0.007229019,0.0024083022],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007365495,0.0000047568633,0.00041392306,0.000021202703,0.000002101752,0.00006887139,0.0064165625,0.000048044636,0.0001151463,0.9217796,0.06484623,0.00627625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019605386,0.000011727885,0.008418978,0.00036056695,0.00002240086,0.00018244339,0.016836837,0.00037301867,0.00040094796,0.1611884,0.8121126,0.000072451956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95603234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9824719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05225761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05225761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05788789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3791573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132927986","doi":"","title":"Models of democratic dialogue the justification for judicial review","year":2004,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada; Canadian Heritage","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Legislature; Democracy; Charter; Constitution; Dialogic; Democratic theory","score_opus":0.04027160308365091,"score_gpt":0.4047744276622828,"score_spread":0.36450282457863187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132927986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017575433,0.0036306689,0.1298515,0.08355303,0.00087033684,0.0001792561,0.0001363074,0.0001158198,0.7640876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9220765,0.0015806966,0.028631318,0.004673214,0.0012122147,0.00053487584,0.00009543267,0.00010033778,0.041095436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97140795,0.019368475,0.0007506962,0.0024621293,0.0042858785,0.001724846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97547525,0.017610766,0.0017519436,0.002058748,0.0022191317,0.0008842599],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02104881,0.00057910837,0.00075557013,0.0024544694,0.0062130284,0.012952554,0.0024408288,0.008610849,0.008324402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034132693,0.0005108519,0.00088155665,0.0023362928,0.031472936,0.010881081,0.004933374,0.006273956,0.0013965885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001969788,0.0000025648526,0.00001744617,0.0000070601313,9.3979276e-7,0.000009672546,0.00032287254,0.00019226187,0.000007325555,0.99845815,0.0004483163,0.0005313373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012235824,0.0000039681763,0.00003147034,0.000027154469,0.000002140389,0.000013580543,0.00017229456,0.00086738024,0.000023759407,0.98344976,0.015391789,0.000004383909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029926111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027184775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02104881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009889394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010349537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11131811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135481431","doi":"","title":"Multilingualism in International Law and EU Law, Vol. III:Case law of the European Court of Justice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Multilingualism; European Union law; Economic Justice; Common law; Scots law; Comparative law","score_opus":0.0292221195768003,"score_gpt":0.3059812032545961,"score_spread":0.2767590836777958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135481431","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023305992,0.06017086,0.0048215184,0.01999764,0.0006713918,0.000041385832,0.000068007685,0.000039315753,0.890884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8047926,0.013730979,0.002553797,0.008692185,0.0014079037,0.00014815052,0.00010243215,0.00010487086,0.16846712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979127,0.0008747561,0.00010456258,0.00021073109,0.00050380424,0.00039343286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868566,0.0008642602,0.00011851972,0.000110755456,0.00013229474,0.00008849635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021847747,0.00048616156,0.00047296332,0.0019094761,0.0036884856,0.012075837,0.0009968517,0.004007675,0.004267629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005401067,0.00030970154,0.00043297227,0.0024153143,0.013082213,0.00526223,0.0034486086,0.0024720822,0.00044099055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010489718,0.000010985544,0.00024567338,0.00004579157,0.0000051781985,0.000106986256,0.0027484323,0.00019724906,0.0000507427,0.97701365,0.013196622,0.006368234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000133724525,0.000021502217,0.0018894274,0.00060452416,0.00001786964,0.00041593058,0.0053752805,0.00069406413,0.00035480913,0.70127684,0.2893118,0.000024668547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015385902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020505011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015385902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053940373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003869459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039136708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135601574","doi":"","title":"Language and Legal Interpretation in International Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Interpretation (philosophy); Customary international law; International Legal English Certificate; Legal research; Principle of legality; Comparative law; International legal system; Public law","score_opus":0.019600212050488317,"score_gpt":0.2997106941019101,"score_spread":0.28011048205142175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135601574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005228163,0.04090341,0.0046697315,0.010680598,0.0007481681,0.00001519376,0.00008275699,0.000049079797,0.93762285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5353557,0.031366073,0.0052271355,0.002324349,0.0020278853,0.00016527489,0.000367038,0.00031652304,0.4228501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975285,0.0016323674,0.00006306572,0.00017106735,0.00041485668,0.00019016431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812204,0.0015152552,0.000064461296,0.000112007154,0.00013101983,0.000055221913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019251956,0.0007617072,0.00068942265,0.001995041,0.002788197,0.0100341635,0.0008813303,0.0028826005,0.011900548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035259072,0.0005139019,0.00028381924,0.0041657537,0.014220781,0.007385564,0.0016338006,0.0033519669,0.0016098169],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037842074,0.000008289711,0.000030999483,0.000028329447,0.0000012493638,0.000017273996,0.0020912664,0.00016241144,0.000031103962,0.97832525,0.013186234,0.006113847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071754425,0.000006438961,0.00026690392,0.00017821208,0.0000047682743,0.00005346036,0.0018037513,0.0004044259,0.00010633453,0.81498677,0.18217209,0.000009715672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009448001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011071931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011900548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005205544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038500654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039811313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135677223","doi":"","title":"The European Court of Justice, the European Central Bank, and the Supremacy of EU Law:Special Issue","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"European union; European commission; Constitutional court; Work (physics); European Union law","score_opus":0.0188033257208091,"score_gpt":0.2722505615409507,"score_spread":0.25344723582014156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135677223","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002822876,0.36551186,0.00095234456,0.09975173,0.018793445,0.000027290973,0.00017536865,0.000035761128,0.5119294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15367429,0.16238481,0.0013929502,0.0469264,0.045370914,0.00019389862,0.0003866718,0.00037358332,0.58929646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983121,0.000551423,0.00010102772,0.00023241462,0.00053532806,0.00026773702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979377,0.0014330802,0.000098464014,0.000117726704,0.00026676027,0.00014628161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002586493,0.000898066,0.0013291473,0.0025414617,0.0059253364,0.018913394,0.0015717585,0.01439114,0.014484141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059018075,0.0007656767,0.00070207205,0.0047330773,0.008290018,0.010226366,0.0032323445,0.009734784,0.0018339745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000155862,0.000029378543,0.000103157356,0.00011325774,0.000009619666,0.00006560872,0.0009872136,0.00015150965,0.000049259757,0.7211003,0.26360717,0.013767903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013688135,0.0000072040116,0.00069709105,0.00080746965,0.000016036358,0.00008846769,0.0010532509,0.00014539999,0.00007354963,0.28618112,0.710896,0.000020693064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022462826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04380268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022462826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008706238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009965122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063168526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135759491","doi":"","title":"Multilingualism in International Law and EU Law, Vol. II:Case law of the International Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Human rights; International human rights law; European Union law; International court; Scots law; Public international law","score_opus":0.025132337290389866,"score_gpt":0.30459758572935597,"score_spread":0.2794652484389661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135759491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011690364,0.091127425,0.0038447664,0.02521753,0.0009567087,0.000043955766,0.000066859575,0.00003924131,0.86701316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6700675,0.03273557,0.0036974386,0.016213838,0.0031662972,0.00026267016,0.00017453507,0.00016996097,0.27351224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981989,0.00071235694,0.00008460396,0.00018862696,0.00047597152,0.00033952692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986003,0.000979427,0.00011480309,0.00009645131,0.000121349934,0.00008780117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019290239,0.0005228412,0.00048060063,0.0022010691,0.003790186,0.011709282,0.001016139,0.004105967,0.005122776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047655827,0.00031829346,0.0004079947,0.0031299922,0.013840493,0.006341691,0.0032891317,0.0033304368,0.0005267411],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000776199,0.00001076722,0.00016168253,0.00004794387,0.000003610084,0.00006826308,0.0024602148,0.00015252145,0.000030841795,0.97025687,0.019985138,0.0068144514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011888798,0.000015951995,0.0013431724,0.0005903297,0.000012663142,0.0002844712,0.004354187,0.00045182626,0.00021517108,0.6528286,0.33987254,0.000019236972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0144593725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021725064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0144593725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006133001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047818096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044498265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135970361","doi":"","title":"The new French model of constitutional review","year":2008,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.06918215873215401,"score_gpt":0.3112056410272481,"score_spread":0.24202348229509413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135970361","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016203055,0.005213221,0.05920691,0.051607165,0.00077234337,0.000097199074,0.00033956414,0.00020183322,0.8663587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86893195,0.0019005234,0.016499212,0.00636919,0.0013414167,0.00029203534,0.00012893285,0.00015152589,0.10438524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98028344,0.013189154,0.00041742212,0.002204318,0.0021471144,0.0017584732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905952,0.0055898903,0.00042964288,0.0015305699,0.001457936,0.00039681638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011284063,0.00071915117,0.00093566976,0.0036629636,0.0058267456,0.016580213,0.001741729,0.007219993,0.013889683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017777909,0.0006019538,0.0011788545,0.002526263,0.017623466,0.010879783,0.0024263486,0.004662314,0.0017042536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025767968,0.0000013952067,0.00002191677,0.0000041960097,0.0000015630493,0.000008056473,0.0001615144,0.00009801464,0.000006768985,0.9983456,0.00075342506,0.0005948101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002480553,0.000008181048,0.0001374239,0.00003897979,0.000010573613,0.000047512134,0.00021147267,0.00083508226,0.000045852743,0.9535986,0.04502577,0.000015640786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045761652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031151595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045761652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017589148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012220386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12761885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135999126","doi":"","title":"Drafting Proper Short Titles:Do States Have the Answer?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Quarter (Canadian coin); Politics; Process (computing); Style (visual arts); Plain language","score_opus":0.0568988737933066,"score_gpt":0.3577561118185657,"score_spread":0.3008572380252591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135999126","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029635714,0.011413386,0.026539335,0.74167895,0.008592769,0.000093154325,0.0007615308,0.00041730478,0.18086784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70154995,0.016188823,0.035258,0.18467903,0.004998421,0.0004201632,0.0015186894,0.0012356754,0.054151285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97298163,0.013222961,0.0027500165,0.0021355157,0.0064412467,0.0024686018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8912246,0.061140433,0.011691598,0.008301099,0.023870202,0.0037720217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03809926,0.00042608724,0.0009951754,0.0026894468,0.008839874,0.01878804,0.0020629535,0.008082828,0.0157405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1442631,0.0011837786,0.0006451098,0.0063498453,0.016770812,0.0360219,0.0042055696,0.010813112,0.0051043737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037972364,0.00002819776,0.004005628,0.0002667129,0.000016053596,0.00012481939,0.017065002,0.00014706154,0.00028868864,0.80406374,0.13455468,0.039401505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023252336,0.000028014867,0.004045842,0.0012140172,0.00003376693,0.00012629585,0.03298765,0.00037182734,0.00093497004,0.2723246,0.6878031,0.00010663796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03413805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03681122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03809926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009948599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024487523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20149052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161308614","doi":"10.7202/1125047ar","title":"Putting Practice into Theory: Ruth Sullivan’s Contribution to Legislative Scholarship, Practice, and Teaching","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legislation; Interpretation (philosophy); Scholarship; Citation; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.012330954898794313,"score_gpt":0.3845760872051047,"score_spread":0.3722451323063104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161308614","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008817957,0.06709365,0.017050428,0.68289846,0.0049850633,0.00006964463,0.00005399075,0.00018538315,0.21884543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7961648,0.053417306,0.023844363,0.068577565,0.005468866,0.00032038867,0.000060550585,0.00036711904,0.051779065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9377758,0.038959086,0.0013665247,0.0028803712,0.015146672,0.0038715836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9273787,0.056827504,0.0019191656,0.0036413234,0.0065613645,0.0036718866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038506016,0.0006210793,0.0013405188,0.005081454,0.027654385,0.018081374,0.0044386555,0.008296207,0.0028079252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047406122,0.00079754274,0.0006857047,0.004437831,0.12117875,0.008276794,0.008879837,0.0148023935,0.00071157573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058654778,0.00002197312,0.0002885453,0.0001469235,0.000009080455,0.00014493744,0.07038145,0.00029649446,0.000062774816,0.8506972,0.05246205,0.025482625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011658844,0.000014197076,0.000657812,0.00079227885,0.0000125593815,0.00013984299,0.018305138,0.00038713467,0.00019109073,0.21757,0.7618607,0.000057446417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5696764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6636365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5696764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08711984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16123511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86571574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161942306","doi":"10.82308/17782","title":"Reforming the advocacy rules in Canadian charity law: Legislative amendments, judicial action or administrative discretion?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Legislature; Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Limiting; Action (physics); Revenue; Doctrine","score_opus":0.07515314114975656,"score_gpt":0.4077364586359134,"score_spread":0.3325833174861568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161942306","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08249101,0.00593278,0.010337247,0.18802209,0.0010013157,0.00014682328,0.00016656483,0.000089312816,0.71181285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9506723,0.0022764024,0.0042032176,0.014246809,0.00030056536,0.00007272274,0.000058619164,0.00005180657,0.028117638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98085505,0.0037346152,0.00056579034,0.0017470202,0.00771067,0.0053868596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984189,0.006181035,0.0016034411,0.0011659471,0.005578684,0.0012818674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015244176,0.00038188358,0.0006527425,0.0023121126,0.019223861,0.020528441,0.0032696815,0.0052802544,0.0053721275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034470987,0.00071300945,0.0006051625,0.0029275168,0.043819055,0.007018652,0.0036664822,0.009863896,0.00058130024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007126291,0.000011842841,0.0005098106,0.000025536197,0.000004132783,0.000042241514,0.0076846196,0.00020796106,0.0001365789,0.980839,0.0044199247,0.0061112694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012775601,0.000034906836,0.011263059,0.00084677164,0.00009450768,0.00009852412,0.026115905,0.002251266,0.0011637406,0.5260893,0.4316658,0.00024841714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9164552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93297505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.106718235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.106718235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18447112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7742986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W71792753","doi":"","title":"All Originals: Fiction and reality of multilingual legal drafting in the European Union and Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Cadmus - EUI Research Repository (European University Institute)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European union; Art; Engineering; Political science; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.03599440214163162,"score_gpt":0.336226350933647,"score_spread":0.30023194879201537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W71792753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0632164,0.008887637,0.0020746668,0.050127484,0.0032588362,0.00009530515,0.0011921163,0.0001704781,0.87097704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6447327,0.0048204777,0.001511198,0.0036962035,0.00047358256,0.000036343867,0.00041472685,0.00029179332,0.344023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931693,0.0008589291,0.00019720545,0.0005612972,0.003740263,0.0014729558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988057,0.0036120994,0.00040665388,0.0009075215,0.00607144,0.0009452705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003674872,0.0005938952,0.00060972816,0.0037792698,0.032159705,0.020858355,0.0023197115,0.0033554411,0.014156372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024885915,0.00044642965,0.00046176076,0.0071714516,0.023548178,0.0026581492,0.004104837,0.00739636,0.000961983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051007188,0.000023493254,0.0012883535,0.00013405363,0.000016906215,0.0005273556,0.092653275,0.0007589152,0.00019656988,0.692958,0.18539885,0.02599324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008222018,0.0000072153175,0.0030302044,0.0002639597,0.000019015648,0.00015519018,0.03155464,0.00034480167,0.00036232837,0.013985239,0.9502153,0.000053890286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9803843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9862969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12595235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12595235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13995765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9138525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W77205514","doi":"","title":"Legislative Drafting Program Provides Global Reach","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislator; Legislature; Legislative assembly; Legislation; Civility; Political science; Law; Public administration; General assembly; Order (exchange); Element (criminal law); Business; Politics","score_opus":0.014989043337821863,"score_gpt":0.34855293952227734,"score_spread":0.3335638961844555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W77205514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007176462,0.0010162913,0.0030010873,0.01556379,0.0037638983,0.000819731,0.0029297103,0.0030001677,0.9691877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00467387,0.0005484279,0.0032630411,0.0040842583,0.0005741616,0.0003337083,0.0020179963,0.00080562185,0.98369884],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99042445,0.0009755049,0.0003339096,0.00091623387,0.005996386,0.0013534997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97612554,0.002189238,0.00055086846,0.0028304907,0.014428853,0.0038750528],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009891247,0.00081689795,0.00090075907,0.004445876,0.0069659464,0.0054700193,0.0019380335,0.0031299696,0.41439164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021015536,0.0008984734,0.00070328545,0.002719252,0.0016768266,0.001921525,0.004375148,0.0036165512,0.25765198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009620846,0.00001853588,0.00014865823,0.000060986935,0.0000021568671,0.000046885827,0.00020160835,0.000036824276,0.00023705141,0.009580685,0.9315918,0.05806507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004223376,0.0000038924413,0.00050019234,0.000024170553,0.0000015960554,0.00001582271,0.000045715544,0.000017820634,0.000049390805,0.00038933757,0.99894434,0.0000035517146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13027097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34985897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86972904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008129252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047725283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83529925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}