{"meta":{"query_hash":"4826bf06c3f2","filters":{"topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation"},"cohort_total":118,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":118,"exported":118,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4826bf06c3f2","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Legal+Language+and+Interpretation"},"results":[{"id":"W125521770","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2560305","title":"The Use of 'Use': Legislative Intent, Plain Meaning, & Corpus Linguistics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Corpus linguistics; Linguistics; Meaning (existential); Legislature; Plain language; Quantitative linguistics; Natural language processing; Applied linguistics; Computer science; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.06685703779046978,"score_gpt":0.3243335371579432,"score_spread":0.2574764993674734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W125521770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27548432,0.019034682,0.14429446,0.0062043564,0.012071621,0.0015600687,0.0000464281,0.00030690877,0.54099715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98234385,0.0013309827,0.00025194912,0.0001031342,0.0006038856,0.0000014319829,0.0000027785761,0.000010941882,0.01535104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799746,0.00032542943,0.00024897643,0.00008963637,0.00041079376,0.00092771475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984469,0.000341201,0.00027181456,0.00011016328,0.00073368626,0.00009625394],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021334253,0.0000809672,0.00011041108,0.00004742249,0.00039897684,0.00021853262,0.0002522543,0.00005959699,0.000010587995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010208416,0.000055879238,0.00007660379,0.00014790808,0.00019615996,0.00029034208,0.000026474994,0.0008594838,0.000016722302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093967676,0.000024851446,0.0022317374,7.9998534e-7,0.00010140261,0.0000022669233,0.0623021,0.00006938444,0.000028357608,0.9260117,0.0021564544,0.0069769747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025147587,0.00020685254,0.000037067377,0.00002646286,0.000033575365,0.00001478795,0.009889041,0.00017124084,0.000028057852,0.07264999,0.9165887,0.000102709004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006327824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.080545455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9144323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007021332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002333329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493465670","doi":"10.1017/s0008413100002516","title":"Some linguistic properties of legal notices","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Ambiguity; Directive; Interpretation (philosophy); Representation (politics); Phrase; Computer science; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01352950252367318,"score_gpt":0.24722279949903456,"score_spread":0.23369329697536137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493465670","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83236355,0.0076438147,0.000106401414,0.004758154,0.0075804177,0.00068916596,0.00005179193,0.000036514368,0.14677021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903156,0.000043075393,0.0007822817,0.00042252927,0.0068880157,0.0000069934754,0.0000019761212,0.00003134546,0.0015081421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978058,0.00040791993,0.0007131481,0.00014740106,0.00018347289,0.00074231095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940138,0.00042726786,0.0006351818,0.00027802063,0.0036136813,0.0010320868],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021845812,0.00018094196,0.00035929814,0.00029603214,0.0005533714,0.0003153186,0.0008298847,0.0001862145,0.000097504155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06914889,0.00014641832,0.00015959221,0.0002479597,0.0007320648,0.00009053054,0.000017863364,0.000615942,0.000010830077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023590575,0.000024130914,0.0016425753,0.00016330917,0.00011610845,0.0006134713,0.20839334,0.00041619473,0.00032634742,0.78691804,0.0008306096,0.00053227984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047412407,0.00032474913,0.0017478168,0.0015778219,0.00031835097,0.0001527979,0.009275715,0.0012569694,0.0014514998,0.035324395,0.947448,0.0006477751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7291602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8903201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94661736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006847952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005723934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1540657271","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1973558","title":"The Elimination of Broker Voting: Much Ado About Nothing?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Voting; Business; Law and economics; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Law; Economics; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.011101008765928537,"score_gpt":0.27190663225745726,"score_spread":0.26080562349152875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1540657271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52200806,0.010406378,0.019954033,0.0049145618,0.0013761783,0.00038433415,0.000001758746,0.000082930295,0.44087178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952756,0.0006749241,0.00005565804,0.000097025266,0.00022091986,0.0000017427684,4.3711535e-7,0.0000066903985,0.003666991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848396,0.00014515554,0.00020291889,0.00007140836,0.00029107885,0.00080548465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999456,0.000068459376,0.00019199823,0.000066132925,0.00018153392,0.00003587049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002375522,0.000054769513,0.00006713467,0.000042053223,0.00054393045,0.00005283176,0.00026815003,0.000053290863,0.000090947484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035152907,0.0000378725,0.00007500096,0.000117459706,0.00010231817,0.00030789422,0.000012174308,0.000584444,0.000019798874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031224612,0.00002439196,0.00062213925,0.0000015437843,0.000037297465,6.374239e-7,0.099918276,4.2417034e-7,0.00022407272,0.84519607,0.00006361399,0.053880338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021401525,0.0021451253,0.016130427,0.00028042868,0.0003067176,0.00016034587,0.3862658,0.0009471743,0.014229401,0.3900709,0.18630135,0.0010221659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013837961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071431925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47326756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002903614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009132159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41835284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1563752931","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2026954","title":"Drafting Egypt's Constitution: Can a New Legal Framework Revive a Flawed Transition?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Transition (genetics); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.008517625268013569,"score_gpt":0.2933754799184375,"score_spread":0.2848578546504239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1563752931","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10045482,0.030221747,0.31164435,0.03920803,0.003281057,0.0007666555,0.000008910536,0.00030284195,0.5141116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924663,0.0007439653,0.0005141384,0.0008908672,0.0032149027,0.000003246637,0.0000034335662,0.000008581903,0.0021545687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997255,0.00023481679,0.00023279389,0.0001162229,0.00034860158,0.0018125088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939203,0.000071710005,0.00012300977,0.00008418454,0.000090556525,0.00023851055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017133869,0.000110738954,0.00014192864,0.00006793505,0.00079067197,0.00016901943,0.00017952324,0.00012290607,0.00036969688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028822708,0.000102351405,0.00012923076,0.00024557998,0.00012434491,0.0009467974,0.000008271716,0.0014385908,0.000058068195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022688788,0.000023618153,0.0002656219,0.0000021409076,0.0000562451,0.0000035639905,0.067020684,0.0000055386754,0.00007164276,0.92043144,0.00015816627,0.011938654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001600437,0.0005297091,0.0002901696,0.0005238306,0.00036592956,0.0010011308,0.11345432,0.000057586392,0.00041458878,0.2428052,0.6379348,0.0010223298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00493457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008035421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89201146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010694058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046693436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8283215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592014777","doi":"10.4000/droitcultures.2880","title":"Langues officielles versus droits linguistiques : l’un exclut-il l’autre ?","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Droit et Cultures","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École Nationale d'Administration Publique","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018837339016467763,"score_gpt":0.3346721171976231,"score_spread":0.3158347781811553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1592014777","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14767997,0.06475459,0.00010116401,0.005768403,0.0063380944,0.0002615772,0.00011323209,0.0002520073,0.774731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9245697,0.0013045712,0.00058208685,0.00105188,0.0037139684,0.000014897378,0.000094316485,0.000030308916,0.068638235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979015,0.0003488932,0.00029311262,0.00028840842,0.0004560649,0.00071199785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894565,0.00022602454,0.00016411782,0.00021484712,0.00018442316,0.00026496276],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005406731,0.00027070098,0.00026630724,0.000052959072,0.00036280733,0.00018276481,0.0003260893,0.00034603933,0.0023069335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000748489,0.00025047298,0.00020339443,0.00027878894,0.00031489177,0.00070676254,0.00007396132,0.0003567588,0.00078727305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007056202,0.00027759472,0.00032729647,0.00005099829,0.000121529316,0.000021420223,0.28859168,0.000007925497,0.0005962759,0.6567251,0.039522465,0.013687111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004644229,0.00015564827,0.0010754336,0.00016490086,0.0001509793,0.0000057418947,0.02132198,0.000067692505,0.004911159,0.0018688436,0.96932435,0.0004888221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006166337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024552844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9298019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001236978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008108811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W160071724","doi":"","title":"Plain English in Quebec Legislation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Statute; Meaning (existential); Plain language; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Affect (linguistics); Political science; Plain English; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Medicine; Communication","score_opus":0.008466890841817872,"score_gpt":0.29698435496761105,"score_spread":0.28851746412579315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W160071724","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13163479,0.000022777836,0.0020227034,0.00020296818,0.00017800026,0.000058197405,1.471391e-7,0.00004237982,0.86583805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788932,0.0000018606737,0.00020030886,0.00026004587,0.00021754364,9.4290766e-7,0.0000023830967,0.0000016647801,0.020422028],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995973,0.000033464275,0.00008315287,0.000057755355,0.00011199229,0.00011630333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998257,0.00006519496,0.000015151704,0.000033485936,0.000035687477,0.000024771329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006196599,0.00002276609,0.000029704528,0.000051743824,0.000047194986,0.000036947597,0.00004639228,0.000041276857,0.0004900784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025887447,0.000021042215,0.0000128119655,0.00013692775,0.000024778443,0.00038767612,0.0000040019254,0.000041595278,0.00003228739],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014263938,0.000025334692,0.012883801,0.000001226658,0.0000017986143,0.000008330173,0.5987442,0.000005361626,0.00021872472,0.30054697,0.0013493965,0.086200595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033294922,0.000025507987,0.0343141,0.000018597628,0.0000026218,8.2326586e-8,0.059588153,0.00014442333,0.0017892306,0.0009967728,0.90261143,0.00017613398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3119841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90236145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90126204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008815986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004015424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69259745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970820959","doi":"10.5539/elt.v7n5p102","title":"A Contrastive Survey of Speech Acts in Hong Kong Bilingual Legislative Texts: A Case Study of CO and SPR","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Language Teaching","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Pragmatics; Linguistics; Legislation; Speech act; Realization (probability); Psychology; Contrastive analysis; Perspective (graphical); Contrastive linguistics; Political science; Computer science; Applied linguistics; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.016877238054850217,"score_gpt":0.34220535705836075,"score_spread":0.32532811900351055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970820959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9645574,0.00014908984,0.000098765995,0.000004581254,0.00009632007,0.00036894536,0.000017512917,0.000030481011,0.03467688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995724,0.0000015200255,0.00015162294,0.000015997213,0.0001484929,0.0000033472777,0.0000071698946,0.000011237294,0.00008819139],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971783,0.0018048468,0.0003249031,0.00022218243,0.00026440152,0.00020532859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815035,0.001332619,0.00020309273,0.00013589396,0.00011738638,0.0000606884],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033441158,0.00011362973,0.00030622643,0.00015678121,0.00011662723,0.00004594019,0.00012032617,0.00007265267,0.000023848219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010278795,0.000104652456,0.000027945767,0.00019358042,0.00012505872,0.0003913165,0.000038751816,0.0003314189,4.9080313e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031439267,0.0001420233,0.089442566,0.00001206133,0.00002195634,0.00023071283,0.8956977,0.0000071570203,0.0004266141,0.00020942622,0.000002666016,0.013775673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011939378,0.0003567212,0.018881787,0.00011172649,0.00002331494,0.0000099557665,0.97806025,0.00023660185,0.0008918205,0.000008738772,0.000058559755,0.00016661499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22622608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27779025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08236252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004708177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000780453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993357890","doi":"10.1093/slr/hml006","title":"How Legislation is Drafted and Enacted in Bangladesh","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statute Law Review","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Parliament; Legislature; Mandate; Commonwealth; Political science; Law; Legislative process; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.01136785493717765,"score_gpt":0.2900013341011395,"score_spread":0.27863347916396186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993357890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013400171,0.2087841,0.00027771568,0.02845319,0.00022701865,0.0012245076,0.000042176816,0.00012478667,0.7474663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969428,0.01998333,0.00029617982,0.004745234,0.0001423135,0.000023911554,0.00008211267,0.000008911171,0.005289987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930656,0.00013090174,0.00013499627,0.00012937884,0.00015108396,0.0001470834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975646,0.00003190721,0.000059069218,0.00007859072,0.000044152657,0.000029798457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025790767,0.000061450875,0.00013396518,0.00002181613,0.000082486345,0.000108250926,0.000054406304,0.000041602652,0.00011092309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053587893,0.000053857944,0.000029692592,0.00022977038,0.00007033005,0.00054507697,0.000009040161,0.000068178,0.000011482123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000800836,0.00004457869,0.0011547392,0.0006304802,0.000011220521,0.000022515922,0.013152099,1.7673148e-7,0.00027476772,0.85157186,0.020710876,0.112418674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009321714,0.000009335383,0.0005733112,0.00053808163,0.000011775161,3.6618275e-7,0.000055884087,0.000007369798,0.000063741354,0.00088607304,0.9976865,0.00007432983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01415713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021078093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9769756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042384367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035686804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020798792","doi":"10.1080/00085006.2008.11092571","title":"Writing Standard: Process of Macedonian Language Standardization","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Slavonic Papers","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Standardization; Macedonian; Norm (philosophy); Linguistics; Standard language; Process (computing); Computer science; Political science; Law; Programming language","score_opus":0.007279359737407534,"score_gpt":0.28336541123047104,"score_spread":0.27608605149306353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020798792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46816796,0.00059807074,0.00007702488,0.00054256245,0.000117047886,0.00017625478,0.00009951069,0.00004284214,0.5301787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983746,0.000057530542,0.000088109125,0.00036210535,0.00008701405,0.0000055040823,0.000017738197,0.000010688558,0.00099674],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990516,0.00006820787,0.00015841248,0.00013320784,0.00028931277,0.00029930385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943936,0.00002855155,0.000064019165,0.00010450371,0.000127408,0.00023615868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002508565,0.00006976393,0.000117452895,0.000112874885,0.00048215623,0.00003257972,0.00013746336,0.000073271396,0.0007503663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025048945,0.00007389955,0.000046504272,0.00027643557,0.00022171033,0.00019317481,0.000003979908,0.00008189533,0.000011032631],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040902232,0.000013930194,0.010737634,0.000065610984,0.00006165269,0.0002087131,0.9138543,0.00014632862,0.0024392218,0.014791635,0.0012328058,0.056407284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016453272,0.00029988913,0.007556969,0.0003725221,0.00008393756,0.00002938646,0.22129133,0.00018518204,0.012660211,0.00023221296,0.7546032,0.0010398447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1455883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5659197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7533704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039924093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022098643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86010134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024403972","doi":"10.7202/042416ar","title":"Pour un manuel de légistique","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Training manual; Computer science; Legislature; Cover (algebra); Scheme (mathematics); Process (computing); Order (exchange); Operations research; Information retrieval; Engineering; Political science; Business; Mathematics; Law; Programming language","score_opus":0.005801337484957332,"score_gpt":0.2625865560614121,"score_spread":0.2567852185764548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024403972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5342378,0.00019286464,0.032709282,0.0029186674,0.00005767301,0.00007623234,0.0000037169164,0.00009001697,0.42971373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679467,0.00003507396,0.0043769577,0.0026947085,0.00028256688,0.0000073231045,0.0000036021609,0.000007938894,0.02464511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993665,0.00008579162,0.00008203578,0.00010050175,0.000118173986,0.0002469865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996956,0.00007154621,0.000032775875,0.00008015566,0.000026463687,0.00009344114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032047753,0.000052474734,0.00006123335,0.00003288423,0.00020216707,0.000057316764,0.00015282996,0.00014464284,0.00056120125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024751754,0.000056989596,0.000050476217,0.000073741794,0.00012966953,0.00015396703,0.0000069157577,0.00017910298,0.00013767858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024637638,0.000059833186,0.0026978054,0.00001186815,0.00003349855,0.000058092992,0.26941243,0.00008528095,0.0028061962,0.5575429,0.00479671,0.16247071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008727188,0.00008910547,0.0138070965,0.00007161106,0.00008583559,0.00003058104,0.01933529,0.0029896214,0.021151593,0.14718941,0.793639,0.0007381104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020370667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023349144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7888423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007769018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011151984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.614476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028847006","doi":"10.1017/s082932010000702x","title":"Theories of Categorization: A Case Study of Cheques","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.017517435087542277,"score_gpt":0.27048286368126695,"score_spread":0.2529654285937247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028847006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94725996,0.011715069,0.000063765445,0.0019387611,0.0011855296,0.00023224004,0.00009657357,0.0000035603969,0.03750456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99450994,0.0007011202,0.0000979621,0.0006625236,0.0003900073,0.000002504154,0.000002769396,0.000019640598,0.0036135092],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982275,0.00029947437,0.00071799586,0.00017335027,0.00014312401,0.0004385668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974843,0.00020989572,0.00066395756,0.00016201657,0.0007032226,0.0007765862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000975312,0.0001772925,0.0005362587,0.00007140328,0.00043019146,0.00007362183,0.000226616,0.00022143516,0.0006176871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017958267,0.00019287008,0.0002861336,0.00035653406,0.0010473109,0.00063735835,0.000013121062,0.00035032825,8.38102e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025218178,0.00005756647,0.00037923604,0.000110846566,0.00020388563,0.0007098919,0.60740644,0.000017256014,0.000010511487,0.38790888,0.00031033953,0.002882651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001266947,0.0015174095,0.0001436564,0.00043205038,0.0005926223,0.0019096526,0.9492481,0.00040846237,0.00006303602,0.011822488,0.032183733,0.0004118891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6575085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90940213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37608638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005050926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066886906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78650135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042695409","doi":"10.7202/042406ar","title":"La stéréophonie législative, facteur de haute infidélité ?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; CLARITY; Statute; Legislature; Simplicity; Style (visual arts); Focus (optics); Law; Political science; Object (grammar); Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.006334597832786917,"score_gpt":0.2696395652041275,"score_spread":0.2633049673713406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042695409","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67468846,0.00016211602,0.0041987957,0.0006278588,0.00005466616,0.000077692785,0.0000053836943,0.00008975523,0.3200953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98044497,0.000063885476,0.0015314614,0.001382944,0.0002459514,0.000008443298,0.0000059833937,0.000011774394,0.016304588],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990105,0.00020335695,0.00012566068,0.00014534467,0.00019088532,0.00032427796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995125,0.00016203712,0.000057462068,0.0001131144,0.000035819292,0.00011905554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005006995,0.0000825494,0.000103040424,0.00005681165,0.00024764388,0.00010602816,0.00019271571,0.00021894764,0.00038766526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032160885,0.000086953936,0.00007367993,0.00014782092,0.00027666974,0.0003348726,0.000012886691,0.00031843747,0.00012265623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025578172,0.000058068137,0.007735959,0.000014249972,0.00005283576,0.000049628987,0.5836962,0.00017878631,0.0023229828,0.19658558,0.0020456791,0.20723449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034729406,0.00003933698,0.014896021,0.00003309694,0.00002937599,0.000008431027,0.007879148,0.0006289876,0.0029862404,0.0078354925,0.9650251,0.0002914279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034985985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023039808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9629795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006869323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014323193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5288858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049826445","doi":"10.7202/042402ar","title":"L'interaction des techniques de rédaction et des techniques d'interprétation des lois","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislator; Interpretation (philosophy); Statute; Political science; Law; Testimonial; Lawmaking; Distrust; Legislature; Humanities; Epistemology; Philosophy; Legislation","score_opus":0.01135308943117734,"score_gpt":0.31736631097022555,"score_spread":0.3060132215390482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049826445","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6422117,0.00013206774,0.20658652,0.00033337512,0.000055151675,0.00023566207,0.0000043940604,0.0006137912,0.14982738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94436103,0.00042498804,0.049752995,0.0007920248,0.00027677647,0.00007749937,0.00001728143,0.000025963527,0.004271428],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873537,0.0002475593,0.00022599417,0.000216509,0.00020621804,0.0003683517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993367,0.00013277894,0.00012364329,0.00011994387,0.00017655673,0.00011032877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081842946,0.00014135544,0.00012924442,0.00019065695,0.0005951954,0.00023108398,0.00017206454,0.00026938817,0.00019291439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004935941,0.00015292055,0.000110744346,0.00023226549,0.0006135784,0.0015919121,0.000014706739,0.00033507103,0.00003149308],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006349246,0.00006468124,0.0018438257,0.000033327142,0.000024359713,0.0000060776433,0.25122884,0.000014522112,0.025374707,0.012409969,0.0003538986,0.7085823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002617218,0.0004432273,0.006972613,0.0006783133,0.00011955331,0.000083969426,0.036691822,0.0010202222,0.673822,0.1044862,0.1746497,0.0007707032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009329397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015808828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7078116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004932523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009361388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99888736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053280603","doi":"10.7202/042323ar","title":"Loi et héritage culturel","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Punctuation; Population; Law; Scope (computer science); Set (abstract data type); Legal writing; Political science; Linguistics; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Legal research","score_opus":0.005931192176188512,"score_gpt":0.2742402702540822,"score_spread":0.26830907807789367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053280603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23107326,0.00033411031,0.004314189,0.0035990768,0.000095865806,0.0000916119,0.000005199337,0.00010947081,0.7603772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9463138,0.00004897563,0.0014481496,0.004658078,0.00027798384,0.0000055315063,0.000007772941,0.0000065876716,0.047233135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993953,0.00007286053,0.00007864411,0.000103338636,0.00015509938,0.00019476727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974996,0.000042098432,0.000029175164,0.000076322496,0.000027269829,0.00007517819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027944602,0.000052125226,0.00006149562,0.000027275339,0.00018896296,0.00007770226,0.00013531459,0.00013619075,0.00035779702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016115379,0.000050954157,0.000054408352,0.00008977643,0.00013599424,0.0002841288,0.000006916862,0.00019693989,0.00016472457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010391255,0.000034946534,0.00037860204,0.0000058339324,0.00001702381,0.000015703768,0.39187068,0.000031382227,0.0012312304,0.5507516,0.008146211,0.047506355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016564778,0.000022582568,0.0006555235,0.000014466654,0.000013040977,0.0000024960236,0.008057927,0.00013242688,0.0010720211,0.005093264,0.9846208,0.00014980686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013278323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003838747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9764746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034264132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050493552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39176264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077073892","doi":"10.7202/1023809ar","title":"Multilingual Legal Drafting, Translators’ Choices and the Principle of Lesser Evil","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Meta Journal des traducteurs","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Point (geometry); Position (finance); Process (computing); Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy; History; Mathematics","score_opus":0.022103007640218986,"score_gpt":0.3175323212462504,"score_spread":0.2954293136060314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077073892","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9707242,0.017382115,0.00127175,0.0006789229,0.00031016843,0.00012617346,0.0000017149476,0.00001765254,0.009487264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99661183,0.0015407414,0.00054374884,0.00013247434,0.00034869966,0.0000029042874,4.0964008e-7,0.000009273234,0.00080992375],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983653,0.0006700578,0.00030147482,0.00011703895,0.00034227155,0.00020387938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992111,0.00028412152,0.00018948248,0.00009544695,0.00012419226,0.00009569319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023819283,0.00010044262,0.0002613045,0.000054374403,0.00046781992,0.00019050988,0.0002458372,0.00004720653,0.00011263997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068875623,0.000058049794,0.00019205418,0.00012835146,0.00069930934,0.0005287834,0.000010086969,0.00023739507,0.000002165449],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043180646,0.0001798135,0.008908999,0.000119358854,0.0013771959,0.00001678561,0.24922413,0.000110565365,0.0049599395,0.25957605,0.00006997381,0.4750254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022971716,0.00018129792,0.006960971,0.00008889938,0.0012128546,0.00007771324,0.001381242,0.00044978102,0.010075666,0.007321798,0.96965647,0.0002961328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006994601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010737424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9695865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014046729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006314533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.359814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085476362","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmm002","title":"Legislative Drafting and Language in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statute Law Review","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Obligation; Normative; Government (linguistics); Legislature; Law; Civilization; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.010263075171416171,"score_gpt":0.32080361860021556,"score_spread":0.3105405434287994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085476362","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013395125,0.119381726,0.00003437482,0.0010861179,0.00012075773,0.00035859892,0.0000064000333,0.000014347845,0.86560255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98615533,0.007079495,0.00014483092,0.006265691,0.00006353054,0.0000054057614,0.000004747395,0.0000037689865,0.00027720732],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936557,0.00007685501,0.00014561317,0.00009033495,0.00014016984,0.00018145649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974203,0.00008872333,0.000043612363,0.0000531407,0.000020059357,0.000052454914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006345079,0.000045723435,0.00011245983,0.000010572872,0.00006959262,0.000015524407,0.000053003103,0.000014418659,0.00008224297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011331042,0.00003993739,0.0000136219405,0.00013857736,0.000041770734,0.00023614425,0.000011935092,0.0000786322,0.000003887324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051611073,0.000008148833,0.0038374858,0.0004973966,0.000009810995,0.00020131283,0.19618519,8.856008e-8,0.000024503033,0.27484524,0.00046723054,0.52391845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006221061,0.0000058371947,0.0014893567,0.0010059412,0.0000071315408,7.543927e-7,0.0017806577,0.0000020100697,0.000031014173,0.000042238065,0.9954895,0.00008336234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9917081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99894273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99502224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001701912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002450905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16285995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095019064","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2002.9986631","title":"Improving legislative drafting capacity","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legislation; Law; Principal (computer security); Political science; Legislative assembly; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.038789550395226136,"score_gpt":0.27908085905250163,"score_spread":0.2402913086572755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095019064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008659726,0.00043537506,0.00045802412,0.009518951,0.00027667513,0.00020935683,0.0000048302127,0.00016283647,0.9802742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899762,0.000021858348,0.0010458945,0.0036535787,0.00032951444,0.0000143297075,0.0000025879656,0.000012287123,0.004943694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986138,0.00032434246,0.00021903009,0.00019711291,0.0002602863,0.0003854801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992682,0.00020557822,0.0001309992,0.00017054123,0.00008523349,0.00013947347],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006032444,0.000099059325,0.00014029832,0.000028971188,0.000907574,0.00012097947,0.00022450933,0.00008884004,0.0035764463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033569333,0.00009830301,0.000059994243,0.00012022844,0.00024828885,0.00015838617,0.000042452328,0.00025224054,0.00076661265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012711578,0.00010157592,0.0005754634,0.000039652994,0.000016515185,0.000016356365,0.4231924,0.0000057121206,0.00021322709,0.5208194,0.013164141,0.04184281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001539789,0.000038477137,0.0000435938,0.000028251972,0.000005950904,8.595622e-7,0.00093638484,0.00040029158,0.00013454778,0.0001714499,0.9979526,0.00013363977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048718475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008636263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9847884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013429223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021625005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104654749","doi":"10.7202/1101221ar","title":"Les mots du droit : une grammatologie critique du droit international public","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.02288680002431749,"score_gpt":0.29992271728643155,"score_spread":0.2770359172621141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104654749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2194329,0.0007616623,0.0070657595,0.16426028,0.01264348,0.00051538757,0.00044344622,0.00071223546,0.59416485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9442521,0.002501636,0.00040607637,0.0019555185,0.0042003323,0.00014448464,0.0007567337,0.00008016395,0.045702986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959137,0.00030459577,0.0009450762,0.0008242431,0.0010608251,0.00095159037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972231,0.00062960904,0.00044229915,0.0003798764,0.00095803716,0.000367074],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012380213,0.00041465668,0.00046011628,0.00063814333,0.00045824592,0.0006906897,0.001833218,0.0005497799,0.0038021593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026867245,0.0005484597,0.00051782554,0.0010995606,0.000554068,0.0017319937,0.00024651803,0.0006756397,0.0020702116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057508303,0.00030729925,0.008535026,0.000080905615,0.000355559,0.0007744795,0.012783406,0.00015577857,0.000214202,0.8978867,0.014264091,0.06458503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080267317,0.000102844344,0.0080514755,0.00047087594,0.00009447001,0.00036699,0.003348012,0.033957295,0.00018592662,0.13453464,0.817299,0.00078579964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05300081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036901366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8030349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024459064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006428638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147357191","doi":"10.7202/042814ar","title":"Le sens ordinaire des mots comme règle d'interprétation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Meaning (existential); Legislator; Literal (mathematical logic); Mistake; Context (archaeology); Linguistics; Statutory interpretation; Philosophy; Original meaning; Law; Epistemology; Legislation; Political science; History","score_opus":0.010782344751875164,"score_gpt":0.2709654093437196,"score_spread":0.2601830645918444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147357191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62868786,0.00014454698,0.018552702,0.0022725498,0.00008732148,0.00010555858,0.0000043891255,0.00011891581,0.35002613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857883,0.000023807464,0.0018530651,0.0012405671,0.0002619708,0.000007761676,0.00001143535,0.000011143317,0.010801941],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925286,0.00010027636,0.00011796463,0.00012701529,0.00015127845,0.0002506379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996394,0.000071115996,0.000047976126,0.000095973286,0.000058124493,0.000087436485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025516935,0.00006893804,0.00008527787,0.000052290416,0.0004844881,0.00009054627,0.00013979709,0.0001294066,0.00013299393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002105764,0.00007690192,0.000059874692,0.00012611557,0.00032032022,0.0004102474,0.000010412059,0.00016086448,0.00010089046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033646673,0.00008299943,0.002103576,0.00001962065,0.00003555439,0.000020635402,0.46034783,0.00013166346,0.001829123,0.28254804,0.0033836595,0.24946363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002008077,0.0003778571,0.020254457,0.00032645997,0.00014493793,0.000046323315,0.12378248,0.0074008396,0.018474258,0.119887345,0.70581144,0.0014855351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059469165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014689839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70242774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005143288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009781454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89899987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262115130","doi":"","title":"Bilinguisme legislatif : regard sur l’interpretation et la redaction des lois bilingues au Canada (Statutory Bilingualism: Examining Statutory Interpretation and Drafting Bilingual Laws in Canada)","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Statutory interpretation; Redaction; Law; Legislation; Statutory law; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.011841637297709571,"score_gpt":0.27200408511962904,"score_spread":0.26016244782191944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262115130","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95786065,0.023024805,0.0013760411,0.0005430245,0.0037663283,0.00031454154,0.000025248717,0.00003643935,0.013052933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99274576,0.0032856935,0.00025912895,0.00037754292,0.001298059,0.000010075293,0.00003611106,0.00007498413,0.0019126673],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916864,0.00220982,0.0011843762,0.0005472559,0.0010167371,0.0033554204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965745,0.0015228863,0.0008225735,0.00022448985,0.00046413572,0.0003914093],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008200114,0.0004915999,0.0005412725,0.00035302385,0.0006609073,0.00026694452,0.0003104669,0.00028124684,0.000046332767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034256217,0.0005192807,0.000111995374,0.0006124626,0.00039094652,0.0024699576,0.00007468012,0.0029774967,0.0000025041215],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000379023,0.00015768947,0.14628546,0.00022449053,0.0003387222,0.000095025905,0.50844353,0.0025331422,0.00065666746,0.022677613,0.00006142362,0.31814724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039253957,0.0014129624,0.05300739,0.0043499446,0.0008027908,0.0015286072,0.7948069,0.037616633,0.0012544652,0.0147996815,0.08280892,0.0036863168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9975216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99991137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3144609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02862516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09287937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269066253","doi":"","title":"Survol des droits linguistiques : Enfin de vrais droits linguistiques au Canada (A Look at Language Rights: True Language Rights in Canada at Last)","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Charter; Humanities; Sociology; Ethnology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0030818190554565464,"score_gpt":0.24270942013991928,"score_spread":0.23962760108446274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269066253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9250913,0.029514128,0.00010693827,0.0010133375,0.0015645308,0.00025627395,0.00011213784,0.000045176523,0.042296134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.943587,0.0014248337,0.00005775228,0.00030881993,0.0025929608,0.00001298247,0.000021772803,0.00004876128,0.0519451],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99205554,0.0010906868,0.00085099833,0.00057250756,0.0009361893,0.004494067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976245,0.0006503003,0.0004972711,0.00032017598,0.00034261876,0.00056512764],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021200476,0.0005267421,0.0005909755,0.00017582868,0.0010803749,0.00010588526,0.0007569277,0.00029315604,0.0011293577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011882621,0.00041645468,0.00018687377,0.00041961958,0.0003676756,0.0003978017,0.0001168731,0.0014721653,0.000045042645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009231888,0.00042605778,0.10547793,0.00029323655,0.0013539251,0.008780849,0.40442437,0.00008490734,0.0059101903,0.4034387,0.010938159,0.05794848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0074359477,0.0018137664,0.01761568,0.0061193025,0.0007014095,0.0026388718,0.05462854,0.00045863233,0.074219,0.15425566,0.6742889,0.005824278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99986404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66335076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07997297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04969276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292006375","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139168533.001","title":"Introduction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Prayer; Kingdom; Law; Political science; English language; History; Classics; Linguistics; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.016195376398946297,"score_gpt":0.22212643550535374,"score_spread":0.20593105910640744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292006375","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000018733697,0.000297713,0.00015616267,0.00012368945,0.00070957583,0.00020533272,0.00003624459,0.00012780531,0.99832475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027789804,0.00015329616,0.000036527475,0.00006412944,0.0025870118,2.636641e-7,0.00004224024,0.000018726987,0.99431884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915516,0.000055774217,0.00009159425,0.0002334495,0.00024596145,0.00021805399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999362,0.000026537635,0.00012472294,0.00022374572,0.00013182689,0.00013119524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001516032,0.00014684051,0.00015884136,0.00009585654,0.00029998462,0.000044684235,0.00024018156,0.00029425375,0.00015360625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017572573,0.00017778666,0.00012241497,0.0000045118436,0.00023431357,0.0002365555,0.00007482351,0.00027107558,0.00015706476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019557665,0.0000032074274,4.9462255e-7,0.000010630065,0.00003445464,0.000015440575,0.0019569702,1.1263638e-7,0.000019005844,0.9044737,0.08804662,0.005419798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008493078,0.000013229737,0.0000023699195,0.000021343802,0.000105661464,0.0000013332574,0.00016895018,0.0000015169907,0.000093552444,0.000006121707,0.9993065,0.00019449508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012530512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032766166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9112599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002904666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009784002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72499293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292298107","doi":"","title":"Les « dents » de la Loi sur les langues officielles: le recours judiciaire sous la partie X (The 'Teeth' in the Official Languages Act: The Court Remedy Under Part X)","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.025333398358721965,"score_gpt":0.3176593911655847,"score_spread":0.2923259928068628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292298107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80668896,0.08578137,0.00076733954,0.057578977,0.0007028168,0.0003585844,0.000007839565,0.00004283109,0.048071276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862727,0.00661832,0.0000076271335,0.000879733,0.001577629,0.000013323703,0.0000054545067,0.000030381094,0.0045948136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931707,0.0037726718,0.00040382042,0.000217041,0.0007533297,0.0016824702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808055,0.0011224094,0.00030485823,0.00023559811,0.00015972486,0.000096853364],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011286565,0.0002368994,0.0002362698,0.00006332679,0.00094601256,0.00037058702,0.0009545437,0.0002849803,0.000071522314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086925115,0.00013622608,0.00019275337,0.00038109394,0.0008569249,0.00031042602,0.000051786974,0.0027209253,0.000043206197],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002293343,0.00069878006,0.0075493334,0.000019082712,0.0004401963,0.00010159186,0.32128313,0.0016129358,0.00011462826,0.4112058,0.018532999,0.23821218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009811899,0.00035543766,0.0043884455,0.0002808509,0.00024704417,0.00046454318,0.7181913,0.0005266326,0.00006861577,0.050478984,0.22363079,0.0003861725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041837595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19450653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39690816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094995194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005067901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312552196","doi":"10.7202/1027339ar","title":"La langue du droit. Rosalind Greenstein (dir.), Langue, culture et code : regards croisés, CERLAC (Centre de recherches en Langues de Spécialité et Cultures) et L’Harmattan, 2003, 203 p., ISBN 2-7475-5334-5 Nicholas Kasirer (dir.), Le droit civil, avant tout un style ?, Montréal, Les Éditions Thémis, 2003, 228 p., ISBN 2-89400-180-0","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015965411862475416,"score_gpt":0.2882900295783926,"score_spread":0.2723246177159172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2312552196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.131281,0.24627711,0.0043343427,0.15781175,0.0021584064,0.003736,0.010778265,0.0018648169,0.4417583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3005023,0.054412678,0.013997828,0.012441876,0.0056244275,0.00028077938,0.004027028,0.0005034921,0.6082096],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909395,0.0040178546,0.0011763301,0.0011915899,0.0008714893,0.0018032243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99617136,0.0006156992,0.00070371106,0.00090435415,0.0008145384,0.0007903553],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038973736,0.00085061364,0.0010968358,0.00023886828,0.00084037735,0.00081841066,0.001167389,0.0017485901,0.00206427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026214018,0.0010473054,0.0005583387,0.0011562309,0.00058446405,0.001875766,0.00024908417,0.0023635025,0.00071936473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014767986,0.0010010225,0.0010933151,0.00039741345,0.00042192306,0.00071503234,0.10970499,0.0005887457,0.0034995936,0.05029152,0.8232542,0.008884543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020374449,0.0001544167,0.002217405,0.0016252119,0.0005702251,0.00071172597,0.01414335,0.0018644334,0.0035614052,0.006111252,0.96540886,0.0015942419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11446474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27581605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19186443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023361593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015972402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339209625","doi":"10.7202/1035892ar","title":"La rédaction bilingue des comptes rendus des comités de la Chambre des communes","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Obligation; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.021626960998935865,"score_gpt":0.29766373861417855,"score_spread":0.2760367776152427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339209625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9050058,0.012336918,0.0024831987,0.0008260292,0.00034275666,0.00016488694,0.00004046723,0.00013858883,0.07866134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796225,0.0060717436,0.0024713406,0.00014242929,0.0005765569,0.00002503739,0.000010326466,0.000039494553,0.011040588],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99698925,0.0015941632,0.00033133358,0.00027944564,0.00017484231,0.00063098664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976105,0.0015777424,0.00017392093,0.00027990257,0.00014699617,0.00021091268],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015639769,0.00018600936,0.00029883644,0.00009097886,0.00070138456,0.00020078068,0.0003559607,0.00047142632,0.0008261189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008775734,0.00020572243,0.00020209452,0.0003422917,0.0027780684,0.00076220144,0.000067789275,0.00037006816,0.00029782136],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010023331,0.00040728052,0.098648295,0.0007146389,0.00016408425,0.00021411246,0.25130326,0.000051011688,0.017313486,0.045319643,0.0013800377,0.5843839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029176732,0.00090737763,0.19204244,0.01436985,0.0006669183,0.001567028,0.04156429,0.0025146366,0.035115235,0.5402553,0.16577838,0.0023008874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010251929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005284913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58208305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012206658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016308484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340449071","doi":"10.7202/1035644ar","title":"L’interprétation judiciaire des droits linguistiques au Canada et l’affaire Beaulac","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.008138708167493285,"score_gpt":0.2654651616229168,"score_spread":0.2573264534554235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340449071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33206108,0.004000568,0.002788023,0.026674654,0.002733061,0.00032918752,0.0001234167,0.00012459529,0.63116544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724003,0.00089729007,0.00045433707,0.001093985,0.0019085557,0.000022796958,0.000024582354,0.000039449933,0.02315872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784297,0.00032523464,0.00040526458,0.0003884904,0.00032818998,0.0007098502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986108,0.0003719063,0.00022021802,0.0002433565,0.00027303564,0.0002806774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056070037,0.00018792764,0.0002875189,0.00007193346,0.00033886876,0.00008636705,0.00032024673,0.00022819593,0.00047899413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013723366,0.00022550931,0.00015353588,0.0002967386,0.00040279713,0.00061104243,0.00004417833,0.00019771168,0.00013439343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006885723,0.00013802787,0.01096095,0.00046709008,0.00014633781,0.0004493438,0.127004,0.00003696405,0.0014317984,0.5656368,0.012710264,0.28094956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017854781,0.00087722304,0.031015106,0.017448876,0.0005682712,0.00021032925,0.014311909,0.0017866155,0.010561971,0.32292438,0.59573954,0.0027702993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83599347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97621846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6403392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034864151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020774964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91960025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345472701","doi":"","title":"Some Problems with the Shared Meaning Rule as Formulated in R v Daoust and The Law of Bilingual Interpretation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Statutory interpretation; Law; Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.003891298027389843,"score_gpt":0.2513665626663399,"score_spread":0.24747526463895003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345472701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98275274,0.0008323818,0.0002465126,0.0022700792,0.00008050777,0.00025934578,6.405691e-7,0.000011939431,0.013545844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992554,0.00018067422,0.000020419488,0.00018081882,0.00011607415,0.0000045211314,0.0000013105542,0.000006847838,0.00023391083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887633,0.00015546805,0.00016930424,0.000082076614,0.00021693434,0.00049989467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954355,0.00012730823,0.00015156677,0.00006875074,0.00008541835,0.000023408675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002386087,0.0000629798,0.000097029406,0.00004103639,0.00029559442,0.000107077845,0.00019127544,0.00004831023,0.000020474832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000165589,0.000031147814,0.00003953438,0.00013574892,0.00027417464,0.00047268285,0.000015729087,0.0010299182,0.0000016727241],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017292576,0.000013289132,0.00018370575,0.0000027594056,0.000041879248,7.4176893e-7,0.12403189,0.000032323813,0.001852233,0.8697193,0.0000016027044,0.003947325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004005321,0.00068517646,0.00035113242,0.00017673231,0.00012407024,0.00017025002,0.114992104,0.004149921,0.0017450199,0.87170875,0.001596773,0.00029476313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00582312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11617559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11035247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009505702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078484317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8999519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346719107","doi":"","title":"Rethinking the Interpretation of Bilingual Legislation: The Demise of the Shared Meaning Rule","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Presumption; Meaning (existential); Interpretation (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Legislature; Legislative intent; Linguistics; CLARITY; Argument (complex analysis); Divergence (linguistics); Epistemology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011762779660335603,"score_gpt":0.27760885556106873,"score_spread":0.2658460759007331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346719107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7809844,0.008420202,0.016220653,0.0076994803,0.0011851827,0.0006285395,0.0000033816173,0.000033161123,0.18482497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987992,0.00020235784,0.000050454717,0.00015665562,0.00013373354,0.0000018054417,4.958579e-7,0.000006452846,0.0006488261],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980777,0.00065044133,0.0002915888,0.00007792631,0.00042218258,0.00048015048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989781,0.0002634406,0.00038528445,0.00014743111,0.00020930263,0.00001649186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044099446,0.0000644075,0.00008962033,0.00002909925,0.00062271854,0.000063726504,0.0004305682,0.000052268144,0.00006104697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015482066,0.000031360443,0.00012950899,0.0002724457,0.00018092827,0.0002752563,0.000019034558,0.0008292548,0.0000015337741],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025384315,0.000013818954,0.0011589265,0.0000029690173,0.0000703551,1.8605324e-7,0.3800237,0.0003270689,0.0009297171,0.6059689,0.000022839324,0.011456127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051825726,0.00017011703,0.000595918,0.00022749772,0.0001700225,0.000060277103,0.12548439,0.002307787,0.0049750498,0.85752445,0.0077727907,0.00019343566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052632863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051387097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2545393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024098366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020318097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47895104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2488304506","doi":"","title":"Bilingual Interpretation of Enactments in Canada: Principles v. Practice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Political science; Linguistics; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012269091142209096,"score_gpt":0.30492908268188895,"score_spread":0.29265999153967986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2488304506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67505324,0.0006066137,0.002080806,0.0036646556,0.001873773,0.00015851221,0.000012562887,0.00000644441,0.31654337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99735814,0.00006578969,0.0016876932,0.00056633115,0.00015877355,9.419183e-7,0.000002732206,0.0000052169703,0.00015436039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846095,0.00010660706,0.00055901386,0.00007562153,0.00068484864,0.00011294142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984937,0.00019773471,0.00057127065,0.0000523884,0.00062614214,0.00005877246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005738911,0.00006384954,0.00013571516,0.0001155218,0.000037598373,0.00003186648,0.00029320308,0.000034329045,0.000083868785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012626983,0.00005772922,0.00007560786,0.00010036731,0.00006524362,0.00086668535,0.000020993151,0.00015244682,0.0000026175196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007761055,0.00038499886,0.0075180805,0.000020692953,0.00030138236,0.00030535046,0.06635343,0.010431707,0.0027447327,0.9028784,0.000053833497,0.008231269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014097684,0.0018119136,0.050633315,0.005001069,0.0003727039,0.0005452914,0.12211426,0.0019437278,0.09453329,0.026188456,0.68126607,0.0014922359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7658559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92779356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010262885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026946114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4780125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2504073153","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511815300.004","title":"Legal theory: epistemology, language and legal reasoning","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sketch; Fiqh; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Islam; Computer science; Sharia; Algorithm; Theology","score_opus":0.011956841647874448,"score_gpt":0.233838866576516,"score_spread":0.22188202492864156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2504073153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00085685676,0.0015197743,0.00016367035,0.000037476773,0.00028248288,0.00026180592,0.0000879306,0.00013199468,0.996658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09165044,0.00010135674,0.00006804542,0.00012243325,0.00040066295,5.0559146e-7,0.000033480716,0.000026797372,0.9075963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987802,0.00019751446,0.00012626302,0.00032614212,0.00023009186,0.0003397825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916995,0.00012373735,0.00017007037,0.00024636503,0.00008567167,0.00020419351],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004085747,0.0002329043,0.00028417137,0.00011525668,0.0004395103,0.00011401089,0.00030420188,0.00040361076,0.000048404578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048826714,0.00026207007,0.00012581279,0.000006509116,0.0006050932,0.00036664295,0.00018727554,0.00042763675,0.00002618949],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006271991,0.000003949922,0.0000038783764,0.000024454017,0.0000717298,0.00032782072,0.004996163,4.914725e-8,0.000027345088,0.98761034,0.0020483679,0.0048231827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020325018,0.00002832782,0.000011201792,0.00009712661,0.00017882537,0.000022136344,0.0016001437,0.0000041419867,0.00006724177,0.000016807046,0.9974724,0.0002983763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067868023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016552128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99542403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019013578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014061555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521691047","doi":"","title":"Book Review: We Are Our Language: An Ethnography of Language Revitalization in a Northern Athabaskan Community","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of international women's studies","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Sociology; Autonomy; Indigenous; Gender studies; Context (archaeology); Anthropology; Media studies; Linguistics; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.023253905527100098,"score_gpt":0.3702929991689918,"score_spread":0.34703909364189167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521691047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8049115,0.17942294,0.00006920085,0.01239955,0.0005093934,0.00019225881,0.000029096653,0.000017574628,0.00244847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.955824,0.04026349,0.00006342569,0.0022922005,0.00024304148,0.000010433288,0.0000029320393,0.0000088118795,0.001291637],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982066,0.00052647776,0.0005318578,0.00007723163,0.00051307696,0.0001447381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814504,0.00016355695,0.0007492694,0.00011980653,0.0007661077,0.000056227716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015377431,0.000097400654,0.0003121311,0.000249254,0.0000982857,0.000018561785,0.0003726454,0.000040211064,0.00012726967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017483358,0.00006418818,0.00011671756,0.00022611617,0.00009265292,0.00079930347,0.000053064578,0.00017568503,0.0000047826097],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016853651,0.00047145737,0.05495997,0.0004319283,0.0005101723,0.00007973076,0.91022104,0.000005531904,0.002523019,0.0003970684,0.017297298,0.012934231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013128116,0.0005468938,0.009389589,0.011398582,0.00006616912,0.000014069332,0.90504014,0.0000033288122,0.00072864635,0.00046038255,0.07073979,0.00029960522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016621598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002830654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15091252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002970475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060890663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2617518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2548248757","doi":"10.71781/1814","title":"Charte canadienne et droits linguistiques : frontières allégoriques et autres assertions consensuelles","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.022873197086802577,"score_gpt":0.36559858306505705,"score_spread":0.34272538597825447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2548248757","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37787232,0.0013499858,0.000045355384,0.0062994226,0.0018504321,0.00071141246,0.00041306097,0.0000115210805,0.6114465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7395752,0.0007575365,0.0020590445,0.000385632,0.0004345958,0.00006812789,0.0009922085,0.000043165626,0.25568447],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693704,0.00086657575,0.0006002983,0.00068500853,0.00030821696,0.0006028455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978605,0.0005102492,0.0005078028,0.000306305,0.0005176232,0.0002975299],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011030637,0.00041538634,0.0005356533,0.0001493453,0.00063469313,0.0008708035,0.0008172828,0.00048019434,0.012243052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011954664,0.00036878578,0.00018190453,0.00018009037,0.00025362454,0.00077877205,0.00009257363,0.00036641012,0.00094447006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017804743,0.0002153034,0.0006540308,0.000054083204,0.00035509592,0.00011590017,0.7772895,0.0000035415549,0.0043503726,0.08361089,0.0047957427,0.12837747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036489867,0.00020088023,0.0017292704,0.0014790008,0.00018251281,0.0000035121914,0.026334433,0.00009679672,0.0094792945,0.0017703633,0.95763683,0.0007221957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2741074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8960456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9528411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029878394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013612797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555677156","doi":"10.7202/1037766ar","title":"Legal Language – Pragmatic Approaches to Its Interconnectivity with Legal Interpretation and Legal Translation1","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Meta Journal des traducteurs","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Scrutiny; German; Linguistics; Premise; Computer science; Epistemology; Psychology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.042937274449119066,"score_gpt":0.2813722736414379,"score_spread":0.23843499919231884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2555677156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.830249,0.0040206923,0.14630829,0.007418227,0.00030738884,0.0004533695,0.000016200036,0.00008387609,0.011142956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99481976,0.00019157928,0.0023040501,0.0002237956,0.0002550905,0.00002485528,0.0000021224228,0.000024412875,0.002154308],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979398,0.00064319256,0.0003235614,0.0002893487,0.00044615008,0.00035794554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991046,0.0002255486,0.00015135437,0.00012637106,0.000119430595,0.00027270237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011646529,0.00020856937,0.00031644097,0.00021203792,0.0003994826,0.0005921909,0.0002272478,0.00006509584,0.0001991007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048695007,0.00012512175,0.00013862413,0.00028319575,0.00022446016,0.00347271,0.000015804302,0.00023446573,0.000020309557],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007095283,0.0001944701,0.0005743988,0.00008670671,0.0010560745,0.0002147674,0.12632164,0.00006590821,0.017623123,0.12299098,0.00015675521,0.7300056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013971863,0.009798414,0.035435032,0.004118436,0.010307935,0.008702445,0.06588385,0.0037353465,0.092427626,0.015839178,0.73265594,0.0071239467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006150468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054606586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7324992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012466713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013702376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.571051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592716210","doi":"10.17118/11143/10153","title":"Les droits linguistiques au Canada","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.00535703464936218,"score_gpt":0.21612915166550156,"score_spread":0.21077211701613938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592716210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2049174,0.0017198231,0.0012993136,0.0018221178,0.00077073876,0.000096791875,0.000017419212,0.00005201249,0.7893044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79120094,0.00017684684,0.00034791091,0.00047801866,0.0012307805,0.0000010278679,0.000011783499,0.000018840445,0.20653386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851316,0.00023450612,0.00017423413,0.0002752781,0.00021410415,0.0005887321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906754,0.000185971,0.0001137314,0.00020196522,0.00012390496,0.0003068838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036248175,0.00016363367,0.0002139999,0.00005534913,0.00052113424,0.00004409825,0.00036457315,0.00024467686,0.0008615018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031535217,0.00022760712,0.00011584496,0.0002110843,0.00016487065,0.00015820435,0.000067847686,0.00025085508,0.000055754637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003291898,0.000036467332,0.00990693,0.0002539467,0.00006590011,0.00027727656,0.04401853,0.00029850606,0.00024375522,0.9050354,0.00378512,0.036045283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020524058,0.000072059185,0.0034557674,0.00038405083,0.00009798232,0.000023574654,0.0011777946,0.0025333867,0.00096514844,0.0014655897,0.98932785,0.00029153866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.967618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9876496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9855428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010158029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010602669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9936418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620240063","doi":"","title":"CANADA, La Corte Suprema ha affermato che nella provincia dell’Alberta non vige alcun diritto costituzionale al bilinguismo legislativo","year":2017,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.013439073427374817,"score_gpt":0.30187980784953516,"score_spread":0.28844073442216034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620240063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5850034,0.0010307946,0.00009824309,0.024488807,0.0029097165,0.0013229933,0.0013489666,0.00006751611,0.3837296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9297571,0.00019379641,0.00022286671,0.0027689983,0.0012421984,0.000015739382,0.00037180004,0.00005049334,0.06537699],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99669844,0.0002597427,0.000564008,0.0007228602,0.00096380163,0.00079113164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972674,0.00043425715,0.0006033007,0.0008970093,0.0003924765,0.00040552075],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054301467,0.00044918942,0.00054693467,0.000073853815,0.0014201266,0.0006255036,0.0011749929,0.00028322326,0.0006847591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017012585,0.00042292973,0.00020335628,0.00016416168,0.0005306963,0.0007134148,0.00026496488,0.00054993934,0.00015210643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013079996,0.0043055774,0.09725901,0.00090016937,0.0016640314,0.0039666593,0.19435084,0.00040511964,0.013136227,0.034640938,0.60017616,0.047887243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084310543,0.000121861005,0.01326262,0.00038356942,0.0001505166,0.000017408236,0.0011698958,0.009815124,0.000772366,0.00007426267,0.9727052,0.0006841012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94698215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9856949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.372529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048086213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003989662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626759417","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0012","title":"Bilingual Interpretation Rules As A Component Of Language Rights In Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisprudence; Political science; Supreme court; Meaning (existential); Legislation; Law; Minority language; Linguistics; Secession; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01107821377210607,"score_gpt":0.2280969517864728,"score_spread":0.21701873801436672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626759417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023239287,0.00022711008,0.000023338458,0.000009716545,0.00018315826,0.0002496667,0.00008317096,0.0000206157,0.97596395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6017826,0.000034681136,0.00005363613,0.000029259369,0.00005906898,3.0529063e-7,0.000044430926,0.000008755337,0.39798722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901235,0.000080897524,0.00018676558,0.00018013488,0.00033859615,0.00020128192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993526,0.000093562114,0.00022068807,0.00015841439,0.00008148358,0.00009325113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012216352,0.0001509311,0.0002488443,0.00013535436,0.0000969221,0.000014633695,0.00023771882,0.00016296981,0.00020033715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013680052,0.00016354184,0.000102456666,0.0000074781833,0.00012713863,0.00013952864,0.00007627428,0.00022079101,0.0000016107438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015059703,0.000013427451,0.00002181457,0.00005112149,0.00008027356,0.00016775359,0.07783878,0.0000058998517,0.00005539919,0.9119443,0.00009579908,0.0095748175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022198398,0.000024757855,0.00001881002,0.00021546836,0.00007354698,0.000001126096,0.0023268037,0.000042849413,0.0003381126,0.00033238094,0.9961889,0.00021525726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95991635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9666678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9960931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077523256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009853457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6669043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2673226964","doi":"","title":"La mise à jour des droits linguistiques canadiens / Michel Bastarache et Michel Doucet (dir.), Les droits linguistiques au Canada (3e éd.), Édtions Yvon Blais, 2013, 1296 pages","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Érudit (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Sociology","score_opus":0.006353465623330921,"score_gpt":0.2144174990847365,"score_spread":0.2080640334614056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2673226964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56903076,0.21846071,0.0008306329,0.06835338,0.0021329196,0.0006050912,0.0007295724,0.00030050124,0.13955647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8829829,0.014576302,0.0014540646,0.0017394455,0.0011841067,0.000010240804,0.00014739984,0.00007497169,0.09783054],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958679,0.001239919,0.00045509843,0.0006886555,0.00058528694,0.0011631246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99679756,0.0006906487,0.00041950552,0.00044325998,0.0007029946,0.000946022],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011080237,0.00054165005,0.00055629184,0.00023348915,0.0019590636,0.00015211695,0.0007092933,0.00055240985,0.00035287096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019750132,0.0006362635,0.0002708006,0.0005085198,0.00065211,0.0004484921,0.0001955727,0.00075741473,0.000053893593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016412121,0.00028900572,0.0037914189,0.0003680865,0.000507824,0.002563133,0.13394032,0.0005799753,0.0007867121,0.081225224,0.71874446,0.057039693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000517697,0.00015087066,0.001502877,0.0004921088,0.00034334068,0.0000867922,0.0076291724,0.0016558965,0.00048388992,0.0010285557,0.98539835,0.0007104523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9963995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31395218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01233254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001965239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740009593","doi":"","title":"Software Support for Multi-Lingual Legislative Drafting","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NPARC","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Summit; Legislature; Work (physics); Software; Face (sociological concept); Civil society; Political science; Computer science; Software engineering; Public relations; Engineering; Politics; Sociology; Law; Geography; Programming language; Social science","score_opus":0.04031201512568208,"score_gpt":0.362732922926063,"score_spread":0.3224209078003809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740009593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04610223,0.000044466426,0.13605875,0.0012777852,0.000641315,0.0006267012,0.000028984052,0.00026109195,0.8149587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9274772,0.00000203083,0.06653556,0.00041786255,0.00028444067,0.000021486545,0.000012871211,0.000008129972,0.0052404525],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994056,0.000024199651,0.00010200083,0.00012476335,0.00014176367,0.00020164206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968624,0.00006430284,0.000044522254,0.000055230474,0.00009943794,0.0000502795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002464462,0.000052397067,0.00006988085,0.00002586582,0.00027883978,0.00005094433,0.00009773654,0.000053033484,0.0003706036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076454465,0.00004985107,0.00005644991,0.000069509886,0.00006955019,0.00025007423,0.00001174901,0.0000605071,0.000055276792],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002597951,0.00006872841,0.0006287571,0.000013382469,0.0000222814,0.000010964315,0.8874704,0.000033106277,0.0035177425,0.043127857,0.00034391953,0.06473688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0047849007,0.00069641916,0.0009749966,0.00018951886,0.00009168497,0.000003960261,0.029126143,0.0007065779,0.04131721,0.032768138,0.8883254,0.0010150841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005847073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011893563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8879815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000080574966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020762681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40578496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759137770","doi":"","title":"Lost (and found) in Translation, ovvero l'esperienza della traduzione dei testi normativi in Svizzera e Canada","year":2011,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Research Padua  Archive (University of Padua)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Medicine; Art","score_opus":0.08537659557439257,"score_gpt":0.2979714025611766,"score_spread":0.212594806986784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759137770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78758645,0.0009697515,0.0073420717,0.0035779423,0.00019079767,0.0018838538,0.00028832557,0.000024560128,0.19813623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99597996,0.0006330304,0.0022997668,0.000050061226,0.000036993366,0.0000015913945,0.000023783652,0.0000139512085,0.00096087356],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957051,0.0016074317,0.00033289575,0.00047206812,0.0010855146,0.0007969568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797773,0.0010252069,0.00013420709,0.00025360167,0.00028424445,0.00032502736],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016458664,0.00019975725,0.00037789953,0.00067122077,0.00048173172,0.000044572716,0.0005631522,0.00013907783,0.00082481425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035121202,0.00024820014,0.00007389738,0.0014265289,0.0011799242,0.00086141354,0.00015126079,0.0007792663,0.000041637737],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008120663,0.00043431247,0.049507927,0.00034062756,0.00007893927,0.000655199,0.91712666,0.00004042928,0.0022955982,0.0058231573,0.0013932269,0.02149184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006334197,0.0015417077,0.53696996,0.0023446807,0.0000882097,0.000017507093,0.35167545,0.044626717,0.00043022327,0.014159197,0.04037218,0.0014399703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8943156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9764485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5654512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004486584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001884179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759279867","doi":"","title":"Words & phrases judicially defined in Canadian courts and tribunals = Termes et locutions définis par les tribunaux canadiens.","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.013585008632870852,"score_gpt":0.26050957872835695,"score_spread":0.2469245700954861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759279867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2952737,0.0067205965,0.000009076249,0.033395667,0.0009653502,0.0006090205,0.00290367,0.000024264502,0.6600987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624679,0.0053847716,0.000102579776,0.0018418832,0.0002910773,0.000042388965,0.000054940607,0.000035911493,0.029778522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966317,0.00044197644,0.0006922498,0.00047666568,0.0003374254,0.0014199839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99684876,0.0004804624,0.00021620137,0.0002861508,0.0001912798,0.0019771669],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009069009,0.00034262118,0.00054318085,0.0011970829,0.0004791548,0.000095493975,0.00034431345,0.00039966067,0.0010822304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009978124,0.00032392604,0.00012675661,0.00056560535,0.00092400884,0.0006151368,0.000025579418,0.00023547659,0.000032500455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057151872,0.00008059656,0.10150441,0.00009894616,0.00017066745,0.00074015657,0.06425027,0.0000110320725,0.000055628803,0.58372325,0.06262721,0.1866807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005480845,0.00012643782,0.044007402,0.0005128027,0.00008637243,0.000010408459,0.00090774655,0.000008940261,0.000033472537,0.0035749194,0.9497298,0.00045360322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8871026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014489442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01084103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761639815","doi":"","title":"Words that bind : words and phrases judicially considered by the Supreme Court of Canada and by the Judicial Committee of [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science","score_opus":0.010115703580239105,"score_gpt":0.2243171275757868,"score_spread":0.2142014239955477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761639815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60405254,0.0021280642,0.0000073739347,0.009923889,0.00024558147,0.0004210474,0.0008095211,0.000007201955,0.38240474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99418616,0.00050962635,0.000011064083,0.0007596409,0.00007797237,0.0000075450857,0.000005404916,0.000009909857,0.0044326987],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870986,0.00017979337,0.00028219217,0.00014758094,0.00038473812,0.00029582693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987103,0.00061833183,0.0002022123,0.00018385744,0.00007969895,0.00020562838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043637428,0.000117111675,0.00024058539,0.00007343914,0.00025004635,0.000022503713,0.00025433907,0.000078666984,0.00015515136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033907517,0.00007028946,0.00003400084,0.00013038429,0.000916169,0.00012872259,0.000026894333,0.00008214031,2.7144873e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010233313,0.00003434517,0.07482745,0.00004890883,0.00021373243,0.000016483817,0.090333335,4.4643667e-7,0.001378047,0.02916888,0.7515703,0.052305784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007126895,0.00012434954,0.010708112,0.00017911075,0.00011543963,0.000003964692,0.011134574,0.0000032657358,0.002006329,0.0021609399,0.972545,0.00030618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99492353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99967265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39013356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008830826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002043677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36253953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764666273","doi":"","title":"Survol des droits linguistiques : Enfin de vrais droits linguistiques au Canada (A Look at Language Rights: True Language Rights in Canada at Last)","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Charter; Humanities; Sociology; Ethnology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0030818190554565464,"score_gpt":0.24270942013991928,"score_spread":0.23962760108446274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2764666273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9250913,0.029514128,0.00010693827,0.0010133375,0.0015645308,0.00025627395,0.00011213784,0.000045176523,0.042296134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.943587,0.0014248337,0.00005775228,0.00030881993,0.0025929608,0.00001298247,0.000021772803,0.00004876128,0.0519451],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99205554,0.0010906868,0.00085099833,0.00057250756,0.0009361893,0.004494067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976245,0.0006503003,0.0004972711,0.00032017598,0.00034261876,0.00056512764],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021200476,0.0005267421,0.0005909755,0.00017582868,0.0010803749,0.00010588526,0.0007569277,0.00029315604,0.0011293577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011882621,0.00041645468,0.00018687377,0.00041961958,0.0003676756,0.0003978017,0.0001168731,0.0014721653,0.000045042645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009231888,0.00042605778,0.10547793,0.00029323655,0.0013539251,0.008780849,0.40442437,0.00008490734,0.0059101903,0.4034387,0.010938159,0.05794848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0074359477,0.0018137664,0.01761568,0.0061193025,0.0007014095,0.0026388718,0.05462854,0.00045863233,0.074219,0.15425566,0.6742889,0.005824278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99986404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66335076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07997297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04969276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790018451","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2018.2","title":"Notes Toward a Postmodern Principle","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discoverability; Interpretation (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Postmodernism; Statutory interpretation; Epistemology; Normative; Rhetorical question; Sociology; CITES; Directive; Reading (process); Linguistics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.028169165798758774,"score_gpt":0.3403192242615245,"score_spread":0.3121500584627657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790018451","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6505607,0.0019773156,0.0029254109,0.01070697,0.0022437088,0.00019940037,0.00001857035,0.000025818325,0.33134216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963964,0.000015123893,0.0006442764,0.001643654,0.0009419214,6.726747e-7,4.1665447e-7,0.0000073737697,0.00035015622],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900514,0.00008888286,0.00022802652,0.00009323468,0.00027277006,0.00031193375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864525,0.0000666424,0.00014814112,0.00010432626,0.00047894043,0.0005566783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005168736,0.00006957458,0.00011873763,0.000080888436,0.00039059244,0.00017150151,0.000412868,0.00007197826,0.0007097647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004905063,0.00006358578,0.00007341551,0.00013518342,0.00048989727,0.00058694655,0.000008826165,0.000155363,0.00010093616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050137864,0.000026146576,0.010237622,0.00001831332,0.00006242361,0.00055937195,0.49386033,0.000008252899,0.0012579454,0.47762892,0.002025749,0.0142647745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015451017,0.00027822613,0.0019744067,0.00013822035,0.000023616562,0.000047130026,0.000805326,0.000029635352,0.0019549995,0.0030639542,0.9913611,0.0001688774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1517964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5656546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98933536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018695564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018457252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85385185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800586352","doi":"10.1080/20508840.2018.1465250","title":"Professional legislative drafters: status, roles, education","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Theory and Practice of Legislation","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Public administration; Kingdom; Professional development; Professional association; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.01292731522742003,"score_gpt":0.3650538824196346,"score_spread":0.3521265671922146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800586352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04640424,0.0008450248,0.0026462355,0.0056774374,0.00060207996,0.00032346617,0.0000043551336,0.00002797897,0.94346917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925661,0.000094023926,0.0004667291,0.0008084103,0.00052041846,0.000009823166,0.0000089869645,0.000004861451,0.0055206507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743634,0.0019839772,0.00014245116,0.00010239651,0.00021539828,0.0001194202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974476,0.0018813976,0.00023273031,0.00011365698,0.00028760955,0.00003697387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033445088,0.000057595287,0.00006353439,0.000041380288,0.00043085372,0.000053103864,0.00008650981,0.000052338604,0.00026918418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027819688,0.000040485756,0.000019702258,0.00013550343,0.00047269117,0.0015395627,0.00002063406,0.000101956335,0.000024561996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005706261,0.00004837104,0.000108016444,0.0000032032872,0.000016420225,1.049982e-7,0.3274285,5.87784e-7,0.0006778767,0.61305857,0.00042276096,0.05766496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021230716,0.000192025,0.001348004,0.00008858104,0.00009015454,0.0000038340695,0.09789582,0.000049499857,0.00085214165,0.08505903,0.8140782,0.00013041131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007732631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027832933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94616187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026921494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029109913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33304775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887986758","doi":"10.29173/alr1297","title":"Legislating Language Use in Alberta: A Century of Incidental Provisions for a Fundamental Matter","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Legislature; Political science; Subject matter; Law; Linguistics; Sociology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01598940405306635,"score_gpt":0.3278651499158751,"score_spread":0.31187574586280875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887986758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67152774,0.038829796,0.00010917199,0.010339328,0.0005885966,0.006408892,0.000059659116,0.00004094714,0.27209586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99368876,0.0008847497,0.00044428877,0.003577082,0.000050450486,0.000084472966,0.000040755862,0.000013127248,0.0012162824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989924,0.000090082896,0.000349383,0.00017769373,0.00016725191,0.00022320446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992353,0.0003956917,0.00013703555,0.0001469073,0.000031146843,0.0000539227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024150622,0.00009773914,0.00024171923,0.000029434666,0.0001008711,0.000046424855,0.00014974161,0.000049521786,0.00034884125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054837944,0.00008410924,0.00013282958,0.00016779557,0.000084842366,0.0006414032,0.00003590697,0.00007638438,0.0000725254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000668738,0.0006116085,0.02430648,0.0033795303,0.000100666024,0.000023243982,0.27278292,0.000007661341,0.0013058841,0.6780293,0.0016227657,0.017763037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002467883,0.00028618396,0.0018355403,0.021411473,0.00024528464,0.0000182229,0.005483001,0.000021929214,0.001005497,0.0008548016,0.9655134,0.00085676933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47656354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.545319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9638907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011147401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007499713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52692205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899526143","doi":"10.5287/ora-1rn2pnqnz","title":"The rights of official language minority communities in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terminology; Political science; Meaning (existential); Norm (philosophy); Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.020802396351709926,"score_gpt":0.28570289508051483,"score_spread":0.2649004987288049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899526143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57868415,0.0001879741,0.000016981427,0.00018650835,0.00015419192,0.00039487722,0.0004108125,0.000011962456,0.41995254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97385937,0.001052536,0.00013530845,0.0000053139397,0.00004825622,1.978953e-7,0.0007102263,0.000009836499,0.024178976],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961071,0.0015227363,0.00019776447,0.0002385008,0.0013405645,0.000593347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973156,0.00095143815,0.0002901321,0.00041426573,0.0008149907,0.00021361069],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013736446,0.00017691044,0.00039926358,0.0005697528,0.0015055884,0.00003110548,0.0019071135,0.00018297508,0.00022696488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001861287,0.00019292958,0.00015088411,0.00076306344,0.0010341203,0.00039816494,0.00027583833,0.000976342,0.0000022825825],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0044535343,0.00027171272,0.0079707205,0.00038725237,0.00031745125,0.0005087755,0.85805196,0.00004927405,0.0001363361,0.08512785,0.01760738,0.025117747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000498282,0.0001166522,0.0043499456,0.00014749687,0.000034191224,3.1857914e-7,0.63569564,0.00015835316,0.0000259421,0.0012879727,0.35750508,0.00018012941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9939839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39577356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013485895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006825693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904615132","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3264804","title":"Measuring Prescriptivity in Canadian Regulations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.016686354077594803,"score_gpt":0.2763803416534147,"score_spread":0.2596939875758199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904615132","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6493655,0.00085846765,0.0011062572,0.0034080707,0.0004485147,0.00013685047,0.0000011827505,0.0000261185,0.34464905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961647,0.00010311086,0.00002645268,0.00010657066,0.00052188954,0.0000016008173,5.644882e-7,0.0000047318117,0.0030704043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808294,0.00014309239,0.000104445135,0.00007747062,0.00018191089,0.0014101292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968654,0.000014274343,0.00003616202,0.000056451732,0.000088553315,0.000117990145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021891778,0.000042037736,0.000051282666,0.00014145399,0.0004674033,0.00008203046,0.00015457833,0.00004685343,0.00012758453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027096467,0.000041534382,0.000029094354,0.00019795672,0.000069847345,0.00040478128,0.0000057571324,0.00050111924,0.00004273672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019192294,0.00002569821,0.035603546,0.0000011856688,0.000032492233,0.0000057991947,0.06365021,0.000010935823,0.00042759487,0.8602255,0.00024186789,0.03975598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010085306,0.0004861226,0.08016721,0.00012702426,0.000040885105,0.000094034294,0.03671083,0.0008859825,0.0005281344,0.5097403,0.3695554,0.0006555236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7188969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36931354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023690835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005677332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905115839","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i4.5077","title":"The Value of Methodological Deductivism in Argument Construction","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European University Institute; McMaster University","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Section (typography); Epistemology; Dialectic; Value (mathematics); Argument map; Informal logic; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.052289089651204525,"score_gpt":0.3782583810100003,"score_spread":0.32596929135879577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905115839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5769414,0.00006528036,0.0019261051,0.0005762869,0.0004821308,0.00013551244,6.7192536e-7,0.000019818284,0.41985282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99634796,0.000022499291,0.0031100637,0.00020579493,0.0001250896,0.0000054411803,5.6672195e-7,9.5176415e-7,0.00018160338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932224,0.00017875528,0.00016741357,0.00005039332,0.00014116964,0.00014002588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958724,0.00019678842,0.0000752138,0.000059949172,0.000060415354,0.000020419071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011265017,0.000035528665,0.00006482285,0.000027561196,0.0001669408,0.000024831834,0.00011745792,0.000052604766,0.00011448203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061588694,0.000021157854,0.000028231669,0.00012459375,0.0005268179,0.00023895841,0.000023060902,0.000068805,0.0000259936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050193947,0.000012104624,0.0020351312,0.0000022645402,0.000005631549,7.6156925e-7,0.03212092,0.00001168595,0.00033321365,0.90855426,0.000049798222,0.056824062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016431024,0.002546427,0.17444715,0.00012408494,0.000050153445,0.00003417502,0.09498813,0.0023862752,0.041885868,0.2638929,0.4172347,0.00076706696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000896118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048655932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64466137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000322301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060792107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19410825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914810151","doi":"10.1515/npf-2018-0034","title":"Regulating Charity in a Federated State: The Australian Perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nonprofit Policy Forum","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Politics; Principal (computer security); Public administration; Scope (computer science); State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Political science; Royal Commission; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.022779306100777077,"score_gpt":0.3738998931947204,"score_spread":0.35112058709394334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914810151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.465565,0.0000267115,0.00004183194,0.0661478,0.00021535739,0.000408231,0.000010987235,0.00007583918,0.46750826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855471,0.0000029510945,0.000050476214,0.0015786331,0.00056440843,0.000016900243,0.0000021370895,0.00000782181,0.012229544],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887663,0.0001660921,0.00014806166,0.00016803884,0.00020572828,0.0004354523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995571,0.000038213097,0.000065816064,0.00011378326,0.0001671453,0.000057992394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004612079,0.000080312784,0.00008671241,0.00007916229,0.00065247377,0.00016021928,0.0001807066,0.00007035722,0.00018750077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005031159,0.000059707072,0.00004027964,0.0005302639,0.00032239818,0.00031219647,0.000035077268,0.00016102276,0.00015286707],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062025865,0.000038485618,0.011824176,0.0000048316538,0.000020592212,0.0000045635798,0.57904965,0.0000012659924,0.0008661467,0.39084592,0.00514349,0.01213889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020109806,0.00062727096,0.08288004,0.0002450373,0.000031235646,0.000009485099,0.497494,0.0020367538,0.026037017,0.15769102,0.22971609,0.001221056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23104718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10646013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51998216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035337976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002791058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90984464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943253563","doi":"10.7202/1058256ar","title":"La modification des dispositions constitutionnelles relatives à l’usage de l’anglais ou du français","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.013803477302619955,"score_gpt":0.2635202801737545,"score_spread":0.24971680287113454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943253563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5847625,0.003406282,0.0126597285,0.0022686692,0.000349744,0.00027697126,0.00006926165,0.000070866576,0.39613596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826679,0.0012162279,0.0015867546,0.00015834474,0.00040080806,0.000037412265,0.000056108976,0.000019313575,0.013857079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983879,0.0004663989,0.00027446405,0.00029540723,0.00016200781,0.0004138348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899024,0.0003707679,0.00014007995,0.00022624321,0.00011315814,0.00015949341],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006195744,0.0001311615,0.00020043514,0.00008529994,0.00046188183,0.00014057141,0.00022960023,0.00029782453,0.0011862303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029119963,0.00019008781,0.00017611177,0.00038561516,0.0008409561,0.00091678736,0.000028997301,0.00028526792,0.0012433613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002118151,0.00017079325,0.03501384,0.00017777474,0.00006237371,0.000037112408,0.16223815,0.0006312202,0.0020357373,0.787155,0.0003327261,0.01212411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027358546,0.00061756495,0.3830456,0.005546708,0.0010278282,0.00054031884,0.04581492,0.050638396,0.004832534,0.33988172,0.16278568,0.0025328556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031910716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006451662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44727325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050627935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018957436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947589675","doi":"10.7202/1059339ar","title":"LA PRÉCARITÉ DES DROITS LINGUISTIQUES SCOLAIRES OU LES SINGULIÈRES DIFFICULTÉS DE MISE EN OEUVRE DE L’ARTICLE 23 DE LA CHARTE CANADIENNE DES DROITS ET LIBERTÉS","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.008899178926120882,"score_gpt":0.2741951505575788,"score_spread":0.2652959716314579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947589675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90965015,0.0054605855,0.00027126394,0.0014709439,0.0002844596,0.00041554606,0.000061885294,0.00018975562,0.082195416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754511,0.0010249559,0.0026985018,0.0004924091,0.0008600542,0.000053871107,0.000024711131,0.000085138316,0.019309232],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956083,0.0016531746,0.00046050316,0.0005447319,0.00024600633,0.001487275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975182,0.001089959,0.000206623,0.00033297707,0.00020715107,0.0006451019],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002163691,0.0003241271,0.00045249794,0.0001313198,0.00050204754,0.00050565746,0.00055698317,0.00064407184,0.00027181453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021342076,0.00043878343,0.0002655614,0.00043822694,0.00083604763,0.0006257091,0.00009292378,0.00067572785,0.00012402177],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011725976,0.00045087253,0.09866386,0.0010329975,0.0001874743,0.0007484256,0.64059997,0.0004936959,0.018981053,0.17804271,0.00051991374,0.060161788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035961098,0.001561769,0.40660116,0.013408193,0.0011870858,0.0015504151,0.04383164,0.028047644,0.045116007,0.31283525,0.13823919,0.0040255375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12125708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15202399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5967683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018359923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006616105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955727152","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmz008","title":"The Drafters’ Dance: The Complexity of Drafting Legislation and the Limitations of ‘Plain Language’ and ‘Good Law’ Initiatives","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statute Law Review","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legislation; Plain language; CLARITY; Law; Simplicity; Political science; Negotiation; Normative; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04602867560778381,"score_gpt":0.33057608494547897,"score_spread":0.2845474093376952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955727152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04286482,0.21026094,0.00022466943,0.01729185,0.00019870217,0.0022019402,0.00006106342,0.000025759618,0.72687024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9719225,0.026667278,0.00012323262,0.001135175,0.000022084148,0.000015549958,0.0000064577757,0.0000034657367,0.000104222636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880856,0.0005970571,0.00022962844,0.00008591884,0.0001801872,0.00009865328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831027,0.0012167337,0.00022389706,0.00014910274,0.00008344455,0.000016556221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013520279,0.00005782781,0.00016457803,0.0000061498777,0.00037592114,0.00005404258,0.00012756902,0.000019172005,0.000014397533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034876834,0.000027462198,0.00004594705,0.000119698474,0.0015448645,0.0002915348,0.000035909274,0.00008809716,0.0000022314364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008093081,0.0000036654953,0.00006668705,0.0001050923,0.000016288537,9.901035e-8,0.08633845,2.5672873e-7,0.00003177298,0.90170145,0.000016542459,0.011711611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017546854,0.00019697378,0.007595091,0.004327545,0.00038491693,0.0000032877178,0.066927254,0.00037780503,0.00040706803,0.036232974,0.88141674,0.00037567926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028808343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063473824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9290577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000084280955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033770863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5692118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982364953","doi":"10.14746/cl.2019.37.5","title":"PREFACE (FERNANDO PRIETO RAMOS, GUEST EDITOR)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Legilinguistics","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"German; Norwegian; Legal translation; Civil code; Translation studies; Competence (human resources); Linguistics; Thematic structure; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.024194819717496912,"score_gpt":0.35753828090848455,"score_spread":0.3333434611909876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982364953","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07305529,0.0004296941,0.0009379494,0.00019939059,0.02164752,0.0005153196,0.000016590875,0.00014693993,0.9030513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97019714,0.000018045632,0.0005120257,0.00021134841,0.011925342,0.000007883198,0.000021682947,0.000009744747,0.017096812],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987555,0.00015902877,0.00020644105,0.0002349001,0.0003712035,0.00027291747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890304,0.0002422241,0.00011432523,0.00021405633,0.00041999083,0.00010638316],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002798967,0.00012722333,0.0002199144,0.000035358094,0.00022604482,0.00012768546,0.00027803215,0.00009436378,0.00039066764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074308243,0.00011901956,0.000060016944,0.00015345051,0.00016793508,0.0001391622,0.000042260483,0.00020661861,0.0011295732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018104109,0.0002685197,0.01924473,0.00006779351,0.00011761257,0.000026757865,0.41209158,0.00019753595,0.0014952506,0.39700267,0.16884229,0.000464224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024405646,0.000076321565,0.0004340855,0.00003591418,0.000014758407,2.9472895e-7,0.0025760347,0.00040972972,0.00075022737,0.00041775455,0.9948643,0.00017656421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005341514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004691007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8971418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000112437156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019761318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009072630","doi":"10.5553/ejlr/138723702020022001001","title":"A Linguistic Insight into the Legislative Drafting of English-Speaking Jurisdictions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Law Reform","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Linguistics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02282715622133777,"score_gpt":0.2852341037927005,"score_spread":0.26240694757136274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009072630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025444517,0.00028943087,0.0005533247,0.0011393668,0.00045565274,0.00004595916,8.197735e-7,0.000014915471,0.9949561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967449,0.000028151388,0.00040563024,0.00065745023,0.0020538773,1.6359324e-7,4.304475e-7,0.000009982333,0.00009943968],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879795,0.0003664714,0.00038498486,0.00006235286,0.00028229525,0.00010593294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875945,0.000083325926,0.00038202005,0.000064302396,0.0006302638,0.00008062037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009555082,0.0000592538,0.00011793579,0.000029896746,0.00031433013,0.00006441638,0.00027736503,0.000013479925,0.000045834142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017356097,0.000035347297,0.00010341546,0.00017049884,0.00017615562,0.00033401395,0.000039188002,0.00027186875,0.000010175855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018051729,0.000008286885,0.000024196546,0.0000045639536,0.000025958981,0.000029106279,0.976404,0.000011685627,0.00016685727,0.020123255,0.0000029387588,0.003181098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001416,0.00017424738,0.00008170198,0.00008591641,0.000025936788,0.0000014066402,0.00268313,0.00003935128,0.000362876,0.0000107261485,0.99634683,0.000046268055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064826803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035262026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9963439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007714689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007847308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24176049},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3107209022","doi":"10.3233/faia200865","title":"Plain Language Assessment of Statutes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Readability; Statute; Operationalization; Plain language; Computer science; Legislature; Legislation; Proxy (statistics); Plain English; Rewriting; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Programming language; Law; Machine learning","score_opus":0.029107683230061722,"score_gpt":0.33788050183367846,"score_spread":0.3087728186036167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107209022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000026511296,0.0014146009,0.21048266,0.00068490737,0.00015910671,0.0006363614,0.00009649428,0.00003417654,0.78646517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82499015,0.0064352364,0.041811563,0.0009980532,0.0017465941,0.00046737038,0.00049164414,0.000110191315,0.12294918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900776,0.000028326498,0.00036792748,0.0002546273,0.00020937901,0.00013199697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994934,0.00006739384,0.00016574877,0.00014227362,0.00005733464,0.00007385849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020280972,0.00012107921,0.00023647348,0.00013209633,0.00011822211,0.000045371384,0.00019447497,0.00015721445,0.00020794968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034242978,0.00013006668,0.00005917404,0.00009449835,0.00032257568,0.0000983132,0.0000328222,0.0002343937,0.000017690712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004681968,0.000016664031,0.00005859384,0.00002086412,0.000014879476,0.00000213867,0.009071566,0.000010970532,0.00003339942,0.83016443,0.0005406453,0.16006118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028581271,0.000081795,0.000026756761,0.00017206724,0.00007045623,3.346211e-7,0.018959075,0.0016730342,0.00087378547,0.43549085,0.5421934,0.00042987536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039715174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074984547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8249636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007203143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001598766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5303965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120066650","doi":"10.32091/riid0024","title":"Application of information communication technology (ICT) to legislative drafting: case studies of legislative drafting assistant softwares in Nigeria and Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Information and Communications Technology; Engineering; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.1366142706643352,"score_gpt":0.5273066232018672,"score_spread":0.390692352537532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120066650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9727069,0.0056770453,0.0034245464,0.0018552649,0.000073764495,0.0009538768,0.000059103433,0.000026029084,0.015223439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99814737,0.00077113503,0.00079629576,0.00019979246,0.000018349841,0.000040723466,0.000007965559,0.000007546903,0.000010837854],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998143,0.0003047944,0.00083950436,0.00015915913,0.00038667847,0.00016683654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736476,0.0005411498,0.0011342791,0.00018083247,0.00069010956,0.00008888558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010038876,0.00012800413,0.00046077612,0.00041154082,0.0002472579,0.0001607296,0.00072382385,0.000076532924,0.00007012705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002747918,0.00012369134,0.000034890967,0.0010797865,0.00025530808,0.00250363,0.00039914617,0.00020768073,4.835426e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019953794,0.000058392074,0.37350482,0.00017530004,0.00017929675,0.000020950947,0.5651381,0.0003869487,0.016905023,0.0019967172,0.00059114274,0.04084378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039589014,0.00035156577,0.2952037,0.0046979226,0.00040962698,0.000054978085,0.43585983,0.0051298426,0.1530129,0.011857225,0.08688135,0.0025822017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39531595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3865384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13610788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020013416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037939198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62465566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123822955","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Myles Mcgregor-Lowndes and Bob Wyatt (Eds.), Regulating Charities: The Inside Story, New York: Routledge (2017)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Political science; Power (physics); Politics; Legislator; Law; Storytelling; Sociology; Legislation; Narrative; Art","score_opus":0.018615693566523355,"score_gpt":0.30026930476576347,"score_spread":0.2816536111992401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123822955","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003211776,0.9300733,0.00045580487,0.034678284,0.00038428555,0.00028307675,0.0000016059653,0.00003903148,0.030872812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55945146,0.35881397,0.00005600247,0.0066988957,0.0023255518,0.000009469303,0.000002396243,0.000027495229,0.07261473],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766874,0.0002994252,0.000251374,0.00019317039,0.00037265042,0.0012146214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989446,0.00011245065,0.00040899453,0.00031698798,0.00009124707,0.00012571095],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002948155,0.00014673785,0.00021424622,0.00003394627,0.0032841244,0.00051234727,0.0006243599,0.00008365056,0.0002551787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008988624,0.00010290943,0.00011421043,0.000048369067,0.00030127313,0.001005429,0.00006318501,0.0012034503,0.000025273743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045924564,0.000029353387,0.0008180262,0.00008382821,0.00022404204,0.000011059124,0.0634802,0.0000015056595,0.0001368588,0.10020567,0.28147033,0.5534932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003072153,0.00011156343,0.00047058353,0.00057533366,0.00007580231,0.0000889686,0.0075979712,0.000036433357,0.00002769031,0.015729755,0.9747705,0.00020817526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036885596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012678859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6933002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039013696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017852203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99801344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136833726","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3675761","title":"Why Write Statutes Which Some People Cannot Read?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.008372716202741989,"score_gpt":0.2675126354109079,"score_spread":0.2591399192081659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136833726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43092078,0.023072936,0.0152311865,0.339318,0.0016002635,0.0007212995,0.000031022035,0.00045774205,0.18864676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891875,0.002526659,0.00004387498,0.005177834,0.001263738,0.0000030012475,0.000006466639,0.000014629064,0.0017762937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975844,0.00018315643,0.00019649649,0.00015975097,0.00038755458,0.0014886555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994345,0.000047449535,0.00010688804,0.00007017762,0.00016247951,0.00017852137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008971126,0.00009796634,0.00013755789,0.0000473032,0.00048627594,0.00018098111,0.00029115062,0.000069847476,0.00041358257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003860425,0.0000886244,0.00007478072,0.00035564232,0.00003913606,0.00081043324,0.000022048824,0.001128361,0.00008658419],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010559412,0.000049961633,0.0018519639,0.000010462401,0.00015536045,0.000011813526,0.14253269,0.00003290373,0.0010274253,0.8229211,0.0099448785,0.021355871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009605868,0.0010055866,0.00048964645,0.000041967425,0.00009641093,0.000058608417,0.069824055,0.00040805494,0.0003216223,0.1428735,0.7833286,0.00059134694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006836407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.098612376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77338374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005186666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00285719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165623109","doi":"","title":"Bijuridism and Bilingualism in Canada: Ideals under Tension","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue française de linguistique appliquée","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neuroscience of multilingualism; Politics; Order (exchange); Compromise; Political science; Law; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.018542210847259828,"score_gpt":0.26756879208336126,"score_spread":0.24902658123610144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165623109","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84278196,0.059246276,0.0017252158,0.0069758757,0.002845905,0.00089461886,0.00007154734,0.00008474345,0.085373856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913952,0.001456482,0.0014524562,0.0016328782,0.0009956637,0.000033856795,0.000010120732,0.000040475752,0.002982907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978956,0.00027638764,0.0005290193,0.00046523556,0.0002200264,0.0006137532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988562,0.00024116825,0.00018487488,0.0002590359,0.00017210309,0.00028661298],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007126856,0.00026113426,0.000397593,0.00010999971,0.00016586964,0.0000352518,0.00023231407,0.00032607754,0.00031792477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006219531,0.0002901077,0.00007361048,0.0003873705,0.0002449791,0.0001167293,0.000066165965,0.00048707,0.00003459084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012984814,0.00020708192,0.016450126,0.0006237913,0.00007303593,0.0017455003,0.37418905,0.00012048432,0.0007290248,0.5788481,0.0021949501,0.024689015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020252832,0.00032168967,0.03724447,0.0037248372,0.0003543098,0.0001899927,0.019110924,0.009410088,0.004045904,0.08040083,0.84055185,0.002619796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9895164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8383569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066205603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024426817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W31708651","doi":"10.3747/co.26.5123","title":"Vagueness and Ambiguity in Legal Interpretation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Ambiguity; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Linguistics; Fuzzy logic","score_opus":0.0069845376402705986,"score_gpt":0.30942492731859494,"score_spread":0.3024403896783244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W31708651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5551583,0.00015849735,0.0011636984,0.0016795291,0.00006956078,0.000073245465,3.809025e-7,0.00003454948,0.4416622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99633884,0.000020798423,0.00034550487,0.00064723106,0.000082521896,0.00000403362,0.000001242638,0.0000020141415,0.0025578209],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995866,0.000060780538,0.00008474445,0.00008430405,0.00008947379,0.000094122435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998696,0.000028011002,0.00001566403,0.000035746503,0.000021227652,0.00002975092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023718298,0.000031858668,0.000045405803,0.00004186439,0.000055383716,0.000043983222,0.000047263544,0.000033633292,0.00025537168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008544651,0.000029021397,0.000011212508,0.00008142988,0.000044989236,0.0006210232,0.000010491996,0.000045403787,0.000027973276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049419574,0.00006994525,0.014834714,0.000009114693,0.0000065190834,0.000006549127,0.22315696,0.000048397647,0.0009001984,0.13885222,0.0008233903,0.6212426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019971428,0.00020365321,0.15164597,0.00017085814,0.000030161249,0.0000071550794,0.03845084,0.034840655,0.008374192,0.0052825413,0.75801665,0.0009801537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011464813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061289307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75719327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005027373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003078783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209325648","doi":"10.13130/1971-8543/14436","title":"L’antinomia del reato culturalmente motivato. Ipotesi giusfilosofiche per un ripensamento","year":2020,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.024166769110460628,"score_gpt":0.22485386468083218,"score_spread":0.20068709557037157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209325648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93092835,0.0021024744,0.0017154516,0.020848842,0.00018172475,0.00047808012,0.00010045876,0.00009522133,0.043549404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855979,0.002011962,0.0009297023,0.0006678707,0.00015573426,2.6708068e-7,0.000040664374,0.000018215065,0.010577691],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980622,0.00025180852,0.00023699553,0.0005990895,0.0004342904,0.00041564784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875104,0.000072263414,0.0002789094,0.0002452853,0.00024083702,0.00041167895],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020720312,0.00028851657,0.0004700229,0.00008951656,0.000680377,0.0000748782,0.0005153136,0.00031243288,0.0006271196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000078001576,0.0002984089,0.00025532316,0.00039029057,0.00066769856,0.00077871943,0.00025031014,0.0003324175,0.00007525169],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011548984,0.00036923905,0.013040865,0.0004370814,0.00097411737,0.00030838215,0.88109577,0.00014123652,0.032351196,0.009402085,0.040736225,0.019988934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008751744,0.0020416088,0.020557126,0.0014168712,0.0026339479,0.000035246874,0.4584094,0.06531962,0.005567462,0.0010542907,0.43092573,0.003286951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005448642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021952389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42268634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001016161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011762935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W339068569","doi":"","title":"A CORPUS-BASED ANALYSIS OF DEONTIC AND EPISTEMIC VALUES OF THE MODAL SHALL IN LEGAL TEXTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deontic logic; Linguistics; Meaning (existential); Modal verb; Sentence; Pragmatics; Obligation; Epistemic modality; Verb; Computer science; Modal; Natural language processing; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02005083112389101,"score_gpt":0.30308184728987475,"score_spread":0.28303101616598375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W339068569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9439054,0.0016463143,0.00004492846,0.00039599888,0.00011413431,0.00015900788,0.000015384014,0.000007058482,0.05371174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99935806,0.000018485256,0.000028382598,0.0003759292,0.000057147703,0.0000046793343,0.0000047088615,0.000004438827,0.00014818685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990137,0.000259252,0.00027933592,0.0001132144,0.00017768453,0.00015680761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993994,0.00027626276,0.00017241955,0.000060498805,0.000053698728,0.000037725487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079720735,0.00007384107,0.00028054637,0.00010484656,0.00013271636,0.000023378698,0.000110691806,0.000100658144,0.000006760006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001689434,0.00006122216,0.00006984198,0.00042012127,0.00061142596,0.00037989317,0.000028378232,0.00010582224,1.8202611e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010247404,0.00010811932,0.28775924,0.00018400427,0.000086417014,0.0000030251172,0.15908909,0.000005934248,0.0009666538,0.55108434,0.00003711076,0.00057361857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0055761696,0.00041444748,0.82128793,0.0014321284,0.0052955346,0.0000035129603,0.1259879,0.009812795,0.0038817145,0.008273647,0.016518392,0.0015158193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013500519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049601113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5428107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000431824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000093017465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9930687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205814575","doi":"10.2307/3504743","title":"10.2307/3504743","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Relevance (law); Political philosophy; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Politics; Philosophy; Public law","score_opus":0.004423186271412567,"score_gpt":0.22448061219380314,"score_spread":0.22005742592239058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205814575","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000935518,0.000038402937,8.185868e-7,0.0005852329,0.0000031312957,0.000079570855,0.0000025935358,0.00007801148,0.9982767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0071524726,3.1923233e-7,0.00004144108,0.00023484831,0.00017459548,0.000005226683,0.000003883541,0.00000480784,0.9923824],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952024,0.000046778267,0.00006408462,0.000087777415,0.00013969764,0.00014143158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997852,0.000024034585,0.000009672946,0.00007890281,0.000026005555,0.000076192286],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001252421,0.000039385603,0.00005041931,0.000022759672,0.00011733122,0.000052208365,0.00011816593,0.000032698794,0.9967319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057445704,0.0000375416,0.000027429416,0.000124319,0.000027927968,0.00015349548,0.0000068784057,0.000033480206,0.9804688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016829837,0.0000133881,2.067424e-7,7.645917e-7,0.0000037030916,0.0000027046665,0.0034760078,0.0000056829085,0.000031361928,0.00005321765,0.09216771,0.90422845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037438338,0.000036902413,0.000010863032,0.0000052933015,0.0000035248956,2.2691454e-7,0.0000142534955,0.000021205271,0.000032303946,0.000008871581,0.99977225,0.000056847777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009619088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010503613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9076046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002946378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003120407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1530902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212796781","doi":"10.22215/etd/2004-05868","title":"Evaluating the punitive turn thesis: is Canadian penal discourse officially exemplifying a punitive mentality?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.06448230649826289,"score_gpt":0.44750628855372243,"score_spread":0.3830239820554595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212796781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19286944,0.0003332398,0.000025574544,0.0029506267,0.00063657085,0.0010179743,0.0001109243,0.00005569218,0.8019999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9586649,0.000043247204,0.0000923118,0.0025630016,0.00047827722,0.00008418735,0.00061364815,0.00003497901,0.037425473],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972757,0.00052900496,0.00035520786,0.0003803504,0.0009034548,0.0005562472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985976,0.00023675506,0.00028375498,0.00019982125,0.00046228408,0.0002197551],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010799502,0.00028438118,0.0002557823,0.00018929971,0.001747276,0.0005061953,0.00049920054,0.0002849164,0.0027779392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059643487,0.00020552186,0.00020354483,0.00032180222,0.00017930304,0.0005030548,0.000017485901,0.00048626322,0.00013305122],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006609613,0.00003837499,0.000065433574,0.00002734962,0.0001714907,0.000020269787,0.9202207,0.000008011774,0.0001426947,0.04701208,0.0003332111,0.03189431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000268247,0.0001390397,0.0020090942,0.0006734115,0.00036025434,0.0000015946869,0.98938113,0.0000841292,0.001187335,0.0027933833,0.0025363618,0.00056598947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8755399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.985707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7657954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008228558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005833064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220723148","doi":"10.4324/9781315253770-30","title":"Language Laws and Collective Rights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.00953017180415712,"score_gpt":0.2714130888372983,"score_spread":0.2618829170331412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220723148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006274815,0.0007222452,0.0000075015328,0.00019531928,0.0001681191,0.00018862396,0.000022312734,0.000062109,0.99857104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012395894,0.000056685076,0.000055418393,0.00037742237,0.00018330432,0.000007901305,0.000021368245,0.00001052754,0.9868915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937123,0.00003392605,0.000086360145,0.00017342756,0.00023214595,0.00010289657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971336,0.0000734261,0.000052426843,0.00007874117,0.000030965894,0.000051077754],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001274617,0.00009179564,0.00012333138,0.0000629767,0.00041256487,0.00005518553,0.00008978045,0.00010894044,0.033639014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019545752,0.00007974569,0.000047980455,0.000021727239,0.00010309825,0.00011912852,0.000043494998,0.0001714671,0.00007886635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005930008,0.0000037113618,0.0000010235572,0.0000027405465,0.000023030118,0.000028894581,0.08384771,2.9478908e-8,0.0000032527398,0.9053649,0.008901142,0.0018176513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072562194,0.00003590155,0.0000019891797,0.000009699909,0.000018964927,9.4212436e-7,0.0009068134,0.0000017548002,0.000011486997,0.022148926,0.9766684,0.00012251225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065709273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012831291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9677673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016295403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011909953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220964383","doi":"10.30853/phil20220144","title":"Linguoculturological Comparative Analysis of Legal Terminology in Judicial Practice in the USA and Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philology Theory & Practice","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terminology; Novelty; Vocabulary; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Linguistics; Sociology; Epistemology; History; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02498137040266672,"score_gpt":0.36700246698559474,"score_spread":0.342021096582928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220964383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7746651,0.00044454457,0.0000131717225,0.019189702,0.00014892103,0.00018708632,0.000009589649,0.000005151449,0.20533675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99009764,0.000043307668,0.00006364253,0.0096371155,0.00004927811,0.00003279337,0.00000805408,0.00000172349,0.000066418754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99124956,0.007833772,0.00025823113,0.0002050309,0.00025417574,0.0001991997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914624,0.008047045,0.00027361163,0.00011415106,0.00007973011,0.000023055803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003938031,0.00007346898,0.0002510918,0.00015613553,0.00026724103,0.000018451756,0.00027311075,0.000057696365,0.00030445718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006656163,0.00005774618,0.000032143253,0.00064510683,0.00036428872,0.0004034884,0.000081283535,0.00055721326,0.0000011926184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012871755,0.00030836827,0.009560666,0.0000013442269,0.00026676373,0.0003857547,0.22306153,0.0003515418,0.000065929,0.7638836,0.00012302802,0.00070429395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077244674,0.000726564,0.06804453,0.0000031849834,0.0014170443,0.00014716141,0.3551645,0.00026542466,0.00002403018,0.009262241,0.5638794,0.00029346283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78571963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91598094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7546214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000107636806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003694204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79685295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233958423","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_103733","title":"Self-Other Agreement","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Agreement; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.012153310569698827,"score_gpt":0.27170662861140343,"score_spread":0.2595533180417046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233958423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000010006722,0.00014992956,0.0006117105,0.00042400957,0.00025149537,0.00014154601,0.000002189002,0.000098590266,0.9983195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029229533,0.00005225622,0.00040215557,0.0019026326,0.00064585166,0.0000026536075,0.0000048482266,0.000014018841,0.99405265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935925,0.00001830181,0.00010921023,0.00013547247,0.00026544373,0.000112347094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996882,0.000025850273,0.00006404141,0.00012149213,0.000050416264,0.00004999233],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018692178,0.0000912216,0.00010421642,0.000035476474,0.000091013404,0.000049480055,0.00013178488,0.00016624935,0.030246302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011730859,0.00007536744,0.000077360855,0.0000065099725,0.000041951018,0.000044302793,0.000016241178,0.00008591736,0.0036762387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.35477e-7,0.0000022921186,0.0000018063714,0.0000056366275,0.000023051758,0.0000011739718,0.008868068,3.250078e-8,8.075513e-7,0.9695111,0.013148851,0.008436257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003306322,0.000019401945,5.0784547e-7,0.000021979047,0.000018141183,8.101289e-8,0.00006280999,0.00000556824,0.0000070836804,0.004423552,0.995297,0.00011076701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010158906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031352947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9821482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007837656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057019046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237208509","doi":"10.17118/11143/16164","title":"La jurilinguistique et l’égalité : les droits linguistiques en tant qu’accords incomplètement théorisés","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.010418918497763182,"score_gpt":0.29530726301331295,"score_spread":0.2848883445155498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237208509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23381127,0.0034624685,0.0015082012,0.0032043427,0.00095047744,0.00030155567,0.00006271342,0.00012628458,0.75657266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90104824,0.0029793952,0.0015272402,0.00033166818,0.0014080803,0.000006763119,0.000023332377,0.00004707724,0.0926282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728453,0.0007710515,0.0003759096,0.0005284956,0.00034002017,0.0006999939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979458,0.00035389233,0.00043223897,0.00065560924,0.00026807014,0.00034437605],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016423318,0.00032976194,0.0004170007,0.00012385503,0.0013714985,0.00037970484,0.001117635,0.00060850184,0.00059362716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012629492,0.00042579795,0.0002986205,0.00012673586,0.0004956732,0.0004301627,0.00038997913,0.0006834968,0.00009963733],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000996363,0.00015440358,0.012501527,0.000350752,0.00014944824,0.00129655,0.09340351,0.000084632935,0.00049416523,0.8686656,0.0006868757,0.022112943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006334688,0.00021721252,0.013971301,0.0015492748,0.000253833,0.0000773674,0.0035876029,0.0015396101,0.0016296918,0.012266891,0.9636269,0.0006468176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03965113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02783693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96294004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003665354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005075509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244496524","doi":"10.5040/9781474292320.0016","title":"Comparing Multilingual Practices in the EU and the Canadian Legal Systems: The Case of Terminological Choices in Legislative Drafting The work of the author has been supported by the Polish National Science Centre funds allocated on the basis of decision no. DEC-20137/11/D/HS5/01822.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Bloomsbury Methuen Drama eBooks","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Work (physics); Political science; Public administration; Law; Engineering ethics; Library science; Engineering; Computer science; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.08062050448646282,"score_gpt":0.34540122688397745,"score_spread":0.2647807223975146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244496524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6629658,0.00096957147,0.000004230163,0.007452261,0.00053215947,0.0030901602,0.00012228379,0.000017105445,0.32484645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913023,0.000013409415,0.000028354329,0.0006308919,0.00022495826,0.00005029932,0.000005837539,0.000019996392,0.0077239214],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940895,0.0024585335,0.0009732227,0.00048933737,0.0014823028,0.0005071471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859764,0.01055661,0.0018437356,0.0007126773,0.00083171006,0.000078850084],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013010165,0.000351786,0.0005064307,0.00020450044,0.0021777214,0.0007023562,0.0024409296,0.0003242116,0.000059758586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074455435,0.00012446265,0.0001914706,0.0003598569,0.008153695,0.00027723907,0.00030381605,0.0010272075,0.0000027939977],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006662395,0.0001355665,0.0027364285,0.00006269205,0.00043092476,0.000100937614,0.718118,0.000102426886,0.0003274308,0.26752606,0.0016502385,0.008143057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005512645,0.0006399793,0.010696698,0.0056636105,0.0018326452,0.00044690628,0.2883796,0.016213655,0.0043140114,0.0087344255,0.65554345,0.0020223353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39414158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6173452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65389323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022366509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001703921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285795054","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v15n3p54","title":"The Competence of the Electoral Commission to Conduct Free and Fair Elections in Tanzania: A Legal Analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Political science; Presidential system; Democracy; Law; Public administration; General election; Impartiality; Jurisdiction; Politics","score_opus":0.01290626226697857,"score_gpt":0.305085606901815,"score_spread":0.29217934463483647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285795054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9792342,0.0004554495,0.00004845924,0.007959021,0.0001363868,0.000063591615,0.000012419205,0.0000015730949,0.012088881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992142,0.000011552491,0.0000386843,0.00034631518,0.00003711667,7.873085e-7,1.3464032e-7,0.0000013708303,0.00034984964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993247,0.00018532564,0.00016128496,0.000035577817,0.00019817978,0.00009492892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996099,0.00011029524,0.00009915469,0.000059031227,0.000072729395,0.000048891456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004338031,0.000028292623,0.000091162496,0.000049766997,0.00054526085,0.00005274187,0.00015248814,0.000012111407,0.000023431207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012246372,0.000016565991,0.000047714402,0.00030864286,0.000119040145,0.00008166768,0.00005267336,0.00015226683,3.489813e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002076631,0.000040318344,0.011697632,0.0000029545997,0.000075794735,0.000004575662,0.017652009,0.00010258113,0.0016383247,0.967721,0.00078862294,0.0002554386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011113998,0.001225051,0.12972075,0.00006671669,0.00055411237,0.00007591888,0.038963743,0.0016867532,0.0019421959,0.02845176,0.7959237,0.0002778727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0134111075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023804331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93926924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005010711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009175668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320169557","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4346447","title":"A First Nations Voice and the Exercise of Constitutional Drafting","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free Exercise Clause; Political science; Law; First amendment","score_opus":0.006774712304847665,"score_gpt":0.2740369906969946,"score_spread":0.26726227839214695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320169557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40682516,0.019046681,0.021221546,0.04821202,0.0012462719,0.0010837048,0.000018939332,0.00022702593,0.50211865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939209,0.0044736736,0.00002073716,0.00003261463,0.00012006646,0.000004267183,0.0000011392609,0.000001955655,0.0014246231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991302,0.00007190756,0.00011810947,0.000049901646,0.00019331882,0.00043656724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948484,0.00030481495,0.00007381888,0.00003214261,0.000081344864,0.00002301624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018836102,0.00003310321,0.00006192103,0.00007396913,0.00094673096,0.000032452175,0.00010161957,0.000024710022,0.000022634626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065814954,0.000022784638,0.000041785268,0.0002886949,0.00050676736,0.0001798577,0.000014224298,0.00029981305,0.000016306634],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016455775,0.0000042406477,0.0003057927,0.0000024303847,0.000018666662,5.0038454e-7,0.019872263,0.000034588153,0.000010498278,0.97813416,0.000025736348,0.00157468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00407698,0.00016123653,0.0017878393,0.00043075235,0.0002251575,0.00015028579,0.13009994,0.003987702,0.00012484714,0.76921713,0.089361645,0.00037647353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007090271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014313421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5870958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011804083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011258577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7987225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377239793","doi":"10.1515/9780228014775-014","title":"Should Quebec Adopt a Written Constitution? A (But Not The) Conclusion","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Linguistics; History; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02891901232179405,"score_gpt":0.2585544050376543,"score_spread":0.22963539271586025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377239793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000012127766,0.0000031498657,0.00008268752,0.001274102,0.00053609995,0.00072264246,0.0004915514,0.0003988358,0.9964788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021665357,0.00013380178,0.0000303852,0.00082987675,0.00024011394,0.0000030596038,0.00006460315,0.000034088254,0.9769987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978375,0.00024868888,0.0002545555,0.00051260093,0.0007497876,0.0003969021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984557,0.00034728873,0.00027492523,0.00043646307,0.00030598041,0.00017962628],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041315902,0.0003399144,0.00036773836,0.00018355304,0.0018838804,0.00011987863,0.00073719013,0.00061285094,0.00018969523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000087441294,0.00031089468,0.00030717967,0.000026669042,0.0010058596,0.0002757422,0.0005117578,0.00066483626,0.00015141335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011558138,0.000007253256,9.862881e-7,0.00002478614,0.00011380756,0.00025486722,0.0047549903,0.00000520534,0.000012899502,0.98835826,0.004493986,0.0018574024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033109443,0.000036456135,0.0000056452577,0.00020631436,0.00021643964,0.0000010832624,0.0010721898,0.000012755986,0.00012952022,0.00049599836,0.99710613,0.00038634223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16470106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016571077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9926122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006132448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036456223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387607509","doi":"10.1007/s11196-023-10051-w","title":"Correction: Religious and Cultural Expressions in Legal Discourse: Evidence from Interpreting Canadian Courts Hearings from Arabic into English","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arabic; Linguistics; Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0193043582254333,"score_gpt":0.34828267555918047,"score_spread":0.32897831733374716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387607509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94123894,0.0014167525,0.00407945,0.033702858,0.01098607,0.0005075183,0.0002352142,0.000083494226,0.007749714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991593,0.0029490942,0.001149834,0.00095918536,0.0020237085,0.000032652642,0.00007554345,0.000027386639,0.0011896142],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997903,0.00025805624,0.00066533126,0.00030451862,0.00052552787,0.0003435523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947228,0.003403607,0.00039155464,0.000169515,0.0010926737,0.00021984392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001367136,0.00018488163,0.00024580708,0.00028864862,0.00039278384,0.0004929983,0.0009768116,0.00018946605,0.000058463895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058631673,0.00016195387,0.00019049198,0.00015333146,0.00027572177,0.0010937365,0.00013403865,0.00065603445,0.000006561359],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008548406,0.00021736906,0.04477788,0.00006643533,0.00122661,0.00060954463,0.68487203,0.015174038,0.01210194,0.18886313,0.037728768,0.01350741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035481574,0.00046763424,0.038924105,0.025041394,0.00040003093,0.00035706823,0.055230457,0.12167099,0.023424815,0.16126236,0.56742245,0.0022505294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41612417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37400523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6296416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096398516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007473323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70191824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390746775","doi":"","title":"DROIT COMMUN, LANGUE COMMUNE: UN RETOUR SUR L'INTERPRÉTATION JUDICIAIRE DU DROIT LINGUISTIQUE AU QUÉBEC À LA LUMIÈRE DU DROIT COMMUN","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09393303450070303,"score_gpt":0.4825885199579052,"score_spread":0.3886554854572022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390746775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6801053,0.065442815,0.0020339116,0.031373117,0.0033447745,0.0015049501,0.00024996413,0.000269706,0.21567546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977148,0.014357022,0.00020563278,0.0050243675,0.0017231749,0.000051965642,0.00012549982,0.00014415418,0.0012201843],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99228156,0.0029939765,0.0018994214,0.0006677604,0.0012835521,0.00087371824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993086,0.0020461942,0.002028725,0.0009162246,0.0012086312,0.0007142226],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003448081,0.0006860067,0.001518708,0.00042500944,0.0015805118,0.0020655307,0.006183131,0.000565049,0.012393746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042110807,0.00078237284,0.00063883775,0.0016539267,0.0010355035,0.0038468102,0.0017069624,0.002029788,0.00020369797],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00090520224,0.0015225121,0.5473421,0.00071597996,0.0013923786,0.00074596645,0.19133341,0.00038790127,0.0058863023,0.014055238,0.13533613,0.10037682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004168981,0.00034444456,0.5545408,0.008383943,0.0014424569,0.00015371417,0.024035899,0.0083243735,0.009618105,0.025688993,0.3595669,0.0037314182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6168415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24375722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37308425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012869758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001568447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392319020","doi":"","title":"Le style clair en droit : étude comparative du discours juridique en anglais et en français, avant et après simplification. Le plain language dans la communication juridique avec le grand public.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plain language; Linguistics; Plain English; Political science; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009774518143274995,"score_gpt":0.2600888495350963,"score_spread":0.2503143313918213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392319020","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36162108,0.0010752799,0.0021618325,0.010672459,0.00015155059,0.0014354488,0.0016210808,0.0002557374,0.62100554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97582024,0.001671925,0.0017479763,0.00017195531,0.000057964626,0.000023867264,0.011013985,0.000070864575,0.009421221],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910476,0.0062635923,0.00051176554,0.0007614696,0.00088388514,0.0005316661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958952,0.0018744434,0.0006844268,0.00095689,0.00031260567,0.00027644666],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024576492,0.00048247023,0.000756179,0.0004641826,0.0020408265,0.00015806819,0.0023432535,0.00042940804,0.00046001832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004915845,0.00062235707,0.00048142293,0.00036562164,0.00082420773,0.0011150343,0.000511276,0.0016523974,0.000020911186],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032694623,0.0005029002,0.0001435583,0.00008563761,0.00025241537,0.000047230842,0.8081994,0.00007357414,0.0015070423,0.18684958,0.0013581251,0.0006536014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001537971,0.00016576392,0.013253414,0.00026979964,0.00015469019,0.000011257855,0.7864569,0.00090730796,0.00027260187,0.0014551401,0.19471002,0.00080514787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16198131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6261957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61419916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005161986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005065349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392408156","doi":"","title":"La francophonie canadienne divisée autour des droits linguistiques prévus dans la Constitution : entre interprétation symétrique et interprétation asymétrique, entre intention législative comme stratégie judiciaire et contraintes juridiques","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Constitution; Legislature; Judicial interpretation; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.009869882018331241,"score_gpt":0.2708574911608414,"score_spread":0.2609876091425102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392408156","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27228898,0.0024470203,0.15618667,0.0062416606,0.001251177,0.0013921936,0.00046581865,0.0005148407,0.5592117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700868,0.0027600513,0.0071880077,0.000398548,0.000106813015,0.00022788935,0.0073133954,0.00011729364,0.011801179],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97196007,0.023135098,0.0016608469,0.0014187547,0.0008608492,0.0009643637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98380077,0.0058951583,0.0018340658,0.00088149006,0.007078464,0.000510025],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008792812,0.0010108472,0.0010405525,0.0005936562,0.0012429749,0.0015269747,0.0010629544,0.001181818,0.00055528554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012220987,0.0011595016,0.00063980324,0.0013193339,0.0018566619,0.001721302,0.0002452118,0.0018358445,0.00006254704],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008900504,0.00063823536,0.0013267725,0.00032558723,0.00027933498,0.000084043524,0.47596043,0.00004752779,0.003967479,0.46284908,0.00018785558,0.05424465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0065381075,0.000106865846,0.048441652,0.08888698,0.0019397165,0.00031712456,0.4115106,0.04926015,0.19484232,0.11305794,0.0784192,0.006679339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1287192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7025968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69779783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017796217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003228812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399164710","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-323-95504-1.00033-8","title":"Semantic Transparency Norms","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Business; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.014264551250714507,"score_gpt":0.2780156440878573,"score_spread":0.26375109283714276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399164710","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000106510915,0.0034398995,0.0000056819667,0.00028869242,0.0010463007,0.00033594115,0.000026120528,0.00016670256,0.99468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016784795,0.00021147534,0.000028491353,0.00033546146,0.00085748226,0.00001645278,0.000020690051,0.000054300395,0.9816908],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867535,0.000020209332,0.00029344673,0.00033262555,0.00042421473,0.000254147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994812,0.000036950798,0.00008176843,0.0002278206,0.00006477604,0.00010748478],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023329034,0.00022979321,0.00027433754,0.000116216805,0.00017408321,0.00014282859,0.00027142497,0.00031759447,0.002436116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012786504,0.00019805743,0.00026218474,0.000012695671,0.00018267488,0.00008377415,0.000025464962,0.0004087881,0.0030525776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029071077,0.0000021066578,8.662522e-7,0.00008480052,0.00005554768,0.00006507747,0.032630708,6.477068e-8,0.000006628206,0.20639317,0.00020015864,0.76055795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039450737,0.000026190548,9.1035463e-7,0.000472222,0.00013162964,0.0000016521622,0.00009495984,0.0000026562388,0.000010249219,0.04512449,0.9538471,0.00024848964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037226557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023434528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95364696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001116167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019182569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399448969","doi":"","title":"Юрислінгвістика в епіцентрі західної науки: проблеми і перспективи","year":2022,"lang":"uk","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.2448914563529436,"score_gpt":0.596717935312,"score_spread":0.3518264789590564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399448969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48164916,0.07158297,0.0002183013,0.0025599557,0.008172414,0.0019136459,0.0005254746,0.00013383552,0.43324426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970225,0.0106855985,0.000097787684,0.0024040616,0.0011562917,0.00012324823,0.00005719439,0.0001218482,0.015128967],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98996305,0.0025983762,0.0019354686,0.0011160997,0.0031639263,0.0012230577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945755,0.0008085135,0.0023009267,0.0009679618,0.0006314955,0.0007155886],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005020647,0.00070184626,0.0014383754,0.0013298808,0.0026762527,0.0043426943,0.008515883,0.00024187237,0.25135008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000937581,0.0007192052,0.0007992987,0.0035049254,0.00056447036,0.0065702107,0.0037827892,0.0017945638,0.00039385335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013992194,0.0025543207,0.15961322,0.00039846703,0.001677722,0.0007339907,0.08633493,0.0011448229,0.04972494,0.006100371,0.5614421,0.1288759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018619696,0.0001830547,0.15665932,0.0008799457,0.00075013743,0.000054678174,0.012967318,0.00060915004,0.009910243,0.018403938,0.7951908,0.0025294211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02598461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012934771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48857585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008357678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013822744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400424259","doi":"10.59704/ba3e9215b8eeb22e","title":"The Salience of “Writtenness” and “Unwrittenness” as Constitutional Categories in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Political science; Psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.007648189164577459,"score_gpt":0.2730482472402296,"score_spread":0.26540005807565215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400424259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3329521,0.0072172424,0.00014263291,0.009182877,0.0022214132,0.00048149624,0.00005691633,0.00003763285,0.6477077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979546,0.00037940737,0.00003797364,0.00016556904,0.00007474972,0.000023995255,0.0000069654193,0.0000031181644,0.00135359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989746,0.00008752527,0.00023237198,0.00020040243,0.0003354198,0.00016964962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941653,0.00025203876,0.00006698263,0.000111333895,0.000107172295,0.000045945908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003723507,0.00009375697,0.00014257991,0.000038757924,0.00016539764,0.00011893572,0.00023109559,0.00008573194,0.000089903544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022491565,0.00006421407,0.000028587829,0.0001222092,0.0009968041,0.00006627518,0.00025379914,0.00030286348,0.0000048694874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059515914,0.000003864705,0.0023750458,0.000052451003,0.000014288511,0.000022204733,0.010267285,0.000040669005,0.000011857654,0.9845318,0.0005282966,0.002146276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041345568,0.000059282793,0.007082081,0.0012935397,0.00013705863,0.000025150312,0.2840233,0.003434439,0.0012704903,0.5872971,0.11374966,0.0012144414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6650025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028132266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072025796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99842566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400446843","doi":"10.59704/53f0a1f60dbaf402","title":"What are Principles and How Do They Work?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Computer science; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.03128466417495498,"score_gpt":0.31383600956083874,"score_spread":0.2825513453858838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400446843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14584069,0.020495784,0.00004892394,0.037161607,0.0041885288,0.0005105588,0.000010442925,0.00032341896,0.79142004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9315095,0.0018859273,0.00016351407,0.00027582783,0.0004411367,0.00002143949,0.0000061359665,0.000010543765,0.06568599],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915373,0.000091540234,0.00007773984,0.00029829337,0.00023013836,0.00014853058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995977,0.000057480494,0.00006350685,0.00016056633,0.000055786582,0.00006495856],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032763666,0.000112638496,0.00013425035,0.00005363683,0.00010186008,0.002646631,0.00017826637,0.00021498454,0.00022242525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012117805,0.00008427861,0.000068280744,0.000055165612,0.00007807078,0.00026564373,0.0004738602,0.00033572852,0.00006535399],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016702588,0.00002823676,0.0027025032,0.0003671946,0.0001508973,0.00006202768,0.61750436,0.000019783312,0.000018025159,0.27613705,0.010409205,0.09258398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012407219,0.000031677882,0.0019472948,0.0041334573,0.00014694562,0.0000015469722,0.1543895,0.00014682968,0.00018709118,0.09789145,0.74013615,0.00086395507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009819733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00710539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7856688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057621935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009789092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401019486","doi":"10.29173/alr2778","title":"Applying Purposive Textualism to Quebec's Codes","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory law; Law; Statute; Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Meaning (existential); Originalism; Legislative history; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; History; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.015256165037924315,"score_gpt":0.34488806233769,"score_spread":0.32963189729976566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401019486","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014522753,0.16977192,0.00015420221,0.015434654,0.0004449494,0.001948009,0.0000040566265,0.000090169015,0.81200683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7238242,0.040659305,0.0003741374,0.10447875,0.0011196091,0.0032233673,0.000062650346,0.00006145891,0.12619653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990794,0.00013609351,0.00018425907,0.0002076006,0.00019854703,0.00019409209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994047,0.0002820666,0.00002437067,0.0001436096,0.00004226303,0.0001029375],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003332851,0.000088415465,0.00017772004,0.00002210563,0.00016493995,0.0002082142,0.0001878824,0.00004172066,0.0011757106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002849401,0.0000708545,0.000098588425,0.00029161098,0.00005720755,0.0003518647,0.000030296875,0.00008398952,0.0021540027],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.2114343e-7,0.000004806523,0.0000023364214,0.00046151716,0.000016931963,0.000008098844,0.013313125,1.4125615e-7,0.00003405359,0.8134911,0.01780459,0.15486248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012227446,0.00001026795,0.0000016150988,0.0035161108,0.000045276633,0.0000014151585,0.00013761663,0.0000047366416,0.00007383549,0.0002168285,0.9958757,0.000104333354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2897852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42145547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97807115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008389623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008587319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401652559","doi":"10.1515/9782763754376-017","title":"THE CHARTER OF THE FRENCH LANGUAGE IN THE MEDIA: CONSTITUTIONAL POLITICS, JUDICIALIZATION, AND SENTIMENT ANALYSIS","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.009183116780741527,"score_gpt":0.26958989898919905,"score_spread":0.26040678220845753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401652559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004543419,0.0019695694,0.00018945569,0.0041793,0.00023230253,0.00019913644,0.000049219903,0.000005807256,0.99272084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84545606,0.00021189278,0.000011473921,0.0011748264,0.0002783652,0.0000059040335,0.0000583537,0.0000036407525,0.15279949],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899983,0.00012592498,0.00021384121,0.000118064556,0.0004381356,0.000104204635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992966,0.0002719054,0.00011200586,0.00017551944,0.00012437656,0.000019567113],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044482166,0.00007787904,0.00013450236,0.000053920663,0.00030210568,0.00007958277,0.00020092943,0.0000925625,0.00097036205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015199052,0.000037235564,0.000112530826,0.000117671276,0.0009305536,0.000046325706,0.00003899453,0.00011955447,0.00000379819],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.6076466e-7,0.000004785015,0.00046733598,0.000002176722,0.00010559072,0.0000021856974,0.037956778,0.0000010548285,0.0000019333363,0.96046054,0.00080889935,0.00018836324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005201359,0.000033001183,0.014377455,0.0003121517,0.002480647,0.0000059596523,0.05544398,0.0002580391,0.00022816597,0.06745122,0.8582504,0.00063885126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044140886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04793452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8930093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003373023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002025313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401652585","doi":"10.1515/9782763754376-012","title":"JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION OF THE CHARTER OF THE FRENCH LANGUAGE COLLECTIVE RIGHTS VERSUS INDIVIDUAL LIBERTIES","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Law; Judicial interpretation; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.01800542786944597,"score_gpt":0.2634213897441681,"score_spread":0.24541596187472214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401652585","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.089438275,0.0010915371,0.00005299371,0.0006773743,0.0037190584,0.0005107803,0.00015712081,0.00001343098,0.90433943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81360424,0.000015087151,0.00003959237,0.00020215187,0.0002880368,0.0000084927215,0.000016669534,0.000013551543,0.18581219],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978114,0.0003666091,0.0005246117,0.0002781921,0.00081348326,0.00020573745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982454,0.0004120877,0.0006129584,0.00034504817,0.00034482722,0.000039656275],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002552977,0.0002490062,0.0003938429,0.000070995084,0.00035328927,0.00004958309,0.00063212303,0.00034707072,0.0043258425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020702534,0.00014568513,0.00048597614,0.0002407299,0.0012470675,0.00023581581,0.00021728298,0.00038525104,0.000022255746],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001338216,0.000071450915,0.00017478019,0.00006170443,0.0006626644,0.0000032058383,0.6269452,0.000010325873,0.00041842222,0.3618516,0.00087292027,0.008793907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013438431,0.0058732876,0.06007023,0.020313628,0.01342002,0.0000343292,0.16613661,0.0040897634,0.31459334,0.119603306,0.275711,0.0067160698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01159249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03845261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.724166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018272833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004957272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99658436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401655299","doi":"10.1515/9782763754376-016","title":"LANGUAGE AS A TECHNOLOGY OF POWER: AN INTERSECTIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE CHARTER OF THE FRENCH LANGUAGE","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Linguistics; Power (physics); Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Physics; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.005861244065032835,"score_gpt":0.2747932504854603,"score_spread":0.26893200642042747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401655299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09494052,0.000508574,0.000036233203,0.00043346555,0.00023398573,0.00016313512,0.00010323658,0.000018521961,0.9035623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7861598,0.0000082673505,0.000031392,0.000141901,0.00003479262,0.0000024046926,0.000017018383,0.0000074699356,0.21359695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988905,0.00007894595,0.00032043824,0.00018479174,0.00042156776,0.00010372298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988493,0.000054338736,0.00037853015,0.00048377953,0.00021252672,0.000021562833],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019964861,0.00011480223,0.00033862024,0.00027523897,0.000062826395,0.000010890329,0.0005179151,0.00027119627,0.009823701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012458541,0.00006774864,0.0004522895,0.00038968507,0.00045639073,0.00007024198,0.00011875034,0.0002203265,0.000004470785],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016891585,0.00011204363,0.0015560124,0.00004550347,0.0024539516,0.00000972286,0.33325443,0.00000614075,0.013730498,0.64131975,0.0005135395,0.0069815353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001719225,0.0015950997,0.020761227,0.002628101,0.013494201,0.000034781515,0.5888315,0.00039163942,0.19743358,0.015295642,0.15526022,0.0025548127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008819638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036874056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6912193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044049866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017546176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99778074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407286278","doi":"","title":"Droits linguistiques et aménagement des langues","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.014887124016038599,"score_gpt":0.2782168655519212,"score_spread":0.2633297415358826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407286278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044603413,0.011934922,0.011049386,0.009310425,0.0008023989,0.00045144363,0.00009996969,0.00041786704,0.9614732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22219424,0.0028172757,0.01288028,0.0005249533,0.0002207317,0.00005098339,0.0005909474,0.000083690684,0.7606369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902503,0.0070927637,0.0006196729,0.000803776,0.00070327555,0.0005302497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99437165,0.0018327725,0.00038812272,0.0009548377,0.0022009388,0.00025165765],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069587524,0.0004449154,0.00042445553,0.00022744712,0.00067994115,0.00093018333,0.0010594409,0.00040642195,0.0011635947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029978899,0.00046617317,0.0003506999,0.0004986719,0.0012120162,0.00039990252,0.0004982572,0.00072292105,0.0011911809],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045004476,0.00016648842,0.00009923197,0.00026894722,0.00011132481,0.000027359756,0.16165712,0.0000025430527,0.00018248272,0.78384495,0.005852298,0.047782734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001825147,0.0000014485602,0.00026258992,0.0067185685,0.00017850209,0.000005730606,0.0009914172,0.0011624862,0.003696955,0.031013014,0.9552101,0.00057670724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013700137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030678516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94935775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058555475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006295889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411656885","doi":"10.51847/ueth4fss92","title":"10.51847/UETH4Fss92","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.005670046911103396,"score_gpt":0.2309536359093813,"score_spread":0.2252835889982779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411656885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010093395,0.00003884547,8.952508e-7,0.0007109988,0.0000034875375,0.00008491146,0.0000027487433,0.000084866566,0.9980639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0068884315,3.4431966e-7,0.00005606008,0.00024669192,0.00018552657,0.000006062275,0.0000040244663,0.0000054547686,0.9926074],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994701,0.000056635083,0.00007015936,0.00009615621,0.00015278005,0.00015414649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997618,0.000028850714,0.0000106269135,0.00008636142,0.00002854004,0.00008377182],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015571271,0.000043258606,0.00005544079,0.000025883463,0.00012799054,0.000054375232,0.00012915894,0.000038236587,0.9966484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006466798,0.00004132584,0.000030095563,0.00013744111,0.00003224156,0.00015766425,0.0000076143187,0.000039941915,0.98029995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001507183,0.0000110773135,1.7379949e-7,6.307385e-7,0.0000033007111,0.0000022719717,0.0035748403,0.000004903541,0.00002937163,0.00004079337,0.019766884,0.9765507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000408793,0.00003642163,0.000011893524,0.0000053929466,0.0000038547205,2.4092662e-7,0.000017305596,0.000025252453,0.000018010422,0.0000053601616,0.99977297,0.0000624065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092506304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000098662695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9800061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031630636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033155295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16852188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412253693","doi":"","title":"Law and Language in Scandinavia","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.046249176382934805,"score_gpt":0.327911754766447,"score_spread":0.2816625783835122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412253693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37018737,0.0025545305,0.00007435384,0.0006306693,0.000022872415,0.00029170286,0.000015054899,0.000012265556,0.62621117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74994373,0.00010876054,0.00012474993,0.000028351153,0.000011113867,3.880515e-8,0.000007589969,0.0000043839145,0.24977127],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978187,0.0009059089,0.00008979522,0.0002183315,0.0006399585,0.000327302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989036,0.0002563694,0.000086143235,0.00024725357,0.00029436842,0.00021227622],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022384657,0.000080473095,0.00020911553,0.00013016374,0.00071249495,0.000027074446,0.00067297736,0.00009886983,0.07469099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000139561,0.000087283435,0.00006143332,0.0005702301,0.0014231541,0.00062080426,0.00041004905,0.0002179696,0.0074700494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000752831,0.00009805735,0.00005847826,0.000047288002,0.000056153563,0.00028740862,0.37805745,0.000017766639,0.0021684123,0.010558015,0.60469055,0.0032075774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010504689,0.00016105841,0.0021275822,0.0000642431,0.000022840575,0.0000018911413,0.19793418,0.000096595664,0.0007120115,0.00003249107,0.79767704,0.000119625955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072217025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08401538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3797564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031324814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031969382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99330276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412317208","doi":"","title":"Justifying the evidential use of intuitive judgements in linguistics","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Psychology; Evidentiality; Natural language processing; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04315366923613121,"score_gpt":0.35187087168632986,"score_spread":0.3087172024501986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412317208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59151053,0.00004175361,0.00041078415,0.0002112185,0.0010675362,0.00030075412,0.0000020509997,0.000015183093,0.40644017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960279,0.000011783455,0.0001482873,0.00025298682,0.00009520992,0.0000015794435,9.969575e-7,0.0000019221934,0.0034593756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995316,0.00007452415,0.00010398432,0.000057458295,0.000151697,0.00008069649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996289,0.00015875969,0.000039250735,0.00006128139,0.00010075862,0.000011035215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025001314,0.000025620995,0.00004734096,0.00002779985,0.00003747582,0.000040444513,0.00008936711,0.000023678816,0.0005663367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013809573,0.000017618313,0.000020314148,0.00010191817,0.000042397714,0.00011676906,0.000025259824,0.000049779675,0.000055861165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006632074,0.000105544845,0.13377337,0.00004750187,0.00004513429,0.000005706443,0.4200486,0.00017381806,0.001383426,0.4258795,0.0030910398,0.015380019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016796485,0.00036349747,0.08622718,0.0007589854,0.00014252074,3.377192e-7,0.11998739,0.007572832,0.013004965,0.004465743,0.76506233,0.00073456886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011470538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043177945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7619713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000289458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003728026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416037236","doi":"10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.5","title":"JUDGEBERT: Assessing Legal Meaning Preservation Between Sentences","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Université Laval","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Sentence; Interpretation (philosophy); Term (time); Semantics (computer science)","score_opus":0.02408618950152515,"score_gpt":0.36051252911151105,"score_spread":0.3364263396099859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416037236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06442233,0.00047927935,0.01972906,0.008351588,0.0013543008,0.00029833434,0.0000035133596,0.00011465374,0.9052469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9357234,0.000049116785,0.00075004133,0.0011700324,0.0006040623,0.000008544371,0.000017372018,0.000008847362,0.061668552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974315,0.00045327324,0.00058166526,0.0004604537,0.0005973449,0.00047576873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872315,0.0004480523,0.00021273241,0.00021331993,0.00030401442,0.000098744975],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010515681,0.00020921155,0.00029622024,0.0001936816,0.0010551456,0.001721379,0.00046476972,0.00023188577,0.001175899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007280085,0.00019457309,0.00015121349,0.0010704523,0.00022760205,0.0055162073,0.00013636902,0.00030465974,0.00008338311],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025543593,0.00012370986,0.0860631,0.00018403781,0.00035934293,0.000012355142,0.11560332,0.000046018133,0.0014969319,0.5721186,0.008380232,0.21558683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014819365,0.00029581104,0.05093871,0.0027920236,0.0010847278,0.000001300134,0.14813735,0.026178868,0.01830662,0.028971104,0.71998245,0.0018291002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023873528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037434634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8713011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019931656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005942673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417500595","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197777497.013.0006","title":"Constitutions and Election Laws","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Election law; Politics; Scholarship; Identification (biology); Work (physics); Dispute resolution","score_opus":0.013433043735706455,"score_gpt":0.23671829579348197,"score_spread":0.22328525205777552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417500595","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000013007529,0.00010179856,0.0005593941,0.00005690941,0.00017289436,0.00019313014,0.000038752667,0.00008022822,0.9987839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0036038244,0.00037625452,0.00007595933,0.000077914454,0.00006760222,3.3047672e-7,0.000013866059,0.000004054921,0.99578017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951065,0.000029824268,0.000063456995,0.00017205457,0.00011425582,0.00010976118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966395,0.00004180445,0.000060910457,0.00009474444,0.00008246994,0.00005610579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006144795,0.00009596335,0.000113629714,0.00009506357,0.0004914536,0.000051020485,0.00011359882,0.00022081788,0.00006893395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013732846,0.00011429969,0.000058227066,0.0000056526983,0.00032790564,0.00011755893,0.00005922636,0.00017949667,8.5726134e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014358183,0.0000018638636,0.0000019220627,0.000011530138,0.000033141605,0.000011916786,0.0019838435,2.0288482e-7,0.0000035717123,0.98770225,0.002023275,0.008212109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101535414,0.00001470885,0.0000014117384,0.00006785203,0.0000901968,6.701558e-7,0.00015285244,0.000007975907,0.000016180444,0.0009825478,0.99845254,0.00011155252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015466255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017211947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99642926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013155538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020465348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4661006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987618578","doi":"","title":"Translation between Internationalization and Localization","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internationalization; Unification; Lingua franca; Politics; Field (mathematics); Legal translation","score_opus":0.2479318286523233,"score_gpt":0.584139530070581,"score_spread":0.3362077014182576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987618578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6108187,0.033180583,0.17386748,0.0019580028,0.0012244014,0.0008817208,0.000079237776,0.000115870746,0.17787398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942567,0.00436287,0.00023820439,0.00029851386,0.00025388636,0.000007965041,0.00009107315,0.000014702883,0.00047613197],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827754,0.00037197943,0.00043098253,0.00022336331,0.00054986536,0.00014628108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987303,0.00021948759,0.00032101534,0.00011242778,0.00050705567,0.000109716464],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008152893,0.00010476888,0.0002297865,0.0002667033,0.00030676834,0.0011686224,0.00049188937,0.000091434216,0.0055636438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049996836,0.00010832461,0.00006050455,0.0006979318,0.000097508,0.003254919,0.00011041192,0.00011521548,0.000006044366],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040472485,0.00008591412,0.8177157,0.000053547992,0.00012306531,0.000012633225,0.015702467,0.0002132426,0.011204576,0.0062123956,0.0038103047,0.14482568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090094557,0.000013423145,0.7351488,0.0006856984,0.0002041195,0.0000052512096,0.0017108226,0.001772832,0.03515597,0.035064645,0.18870428,0.0006332056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020202342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076560804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38343793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000077983364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016734458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989345708","doi":"","title":"Are machine learning corpora “fair dealing” under Canadian law?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UWSpace (University of Waterloo)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Key (lock); Training set; Machine translation; Training (meteorology)","score_opus":0.01472327995228694,"score_gpt":0.2173807952109115,"score_spread":0.20265751525862455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989345708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93817294,0.00013389798,0.000060175127,0.008893546,0.00013774102,0.00006437477,0.000019307116,0.000053239724,0.052464794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83375096,0.000020317228,0.00029961005,0.0003162493,0.000028534329,3.791978e-8,0.000024524803,0.0000046716627,0.1655551],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993146,0.00013190556,0.00004392066,0.00014282789,0.0001587991,0.00020794015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994921,0.00002409263,0.000088046545,0.00009012252,0.00014711473,0.00015850138],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014011987,0.000058200072,0.0001101988,0.00006322698,0.0005465209,0.00003348806,0.00013834376,0.00008095955,0.0011089589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003586969,0.00007102529,0.000060962368,0.0001634881,0.00013617879,0.0002495417,0.000032148124,0.00012808172,0.00007016477],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002620662,0.000041633484,0.030630572,0.00003347552,0.00008413945,0.0006716769,0.8791176,0.0003996503,0.0012045868,0.08451782,0.0018853825,0.0013872263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047385594,0.000046900946,0.006491262,0.00008770562,0.00006186917,0.0000038486037,0.8261366,0.00060314033,0.0007760765,0.00067695335,0.16434613,0.00029568246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.976995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99672604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16246074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014323149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019677338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989773348","doi":"","title":"Canadian Law Dictionary","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Citation; Source document; Legal document; Jurisprudence; Legal research","score_opus":0.008302208825228462,"score_gpt":0.2512596954620358,"score_spread":0.24295748663680733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989773348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036036454,0.0002240694,0.000015095824,0.0040375832,0.00049888296,0.00020019547,0.000009543529,0.00009104177,0.95888716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730282,0.000010392979,0.00016998703,0.008289708,0.0004897415,0.000036105037,0.000016458065,0.000009314186,0.01795013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991029,0.00009045844,0.000119085686,0.00015343256,0.00021476574,0.00031935377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992687,0.000035200537,0.000027986383,0.00014554964,0.00009485791,0.00042771825],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001598857,0.00007231651,0.00007569358,0.000034918525,0.0006276382,0.00022484653,0.00019045068,0.00009402599,0.011406715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000067844245,0.00006993927,0.000049716786,0.00012226152,0.00012716322,0.0009035215,0.000014307838,0.00014362618,0.005341688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016248015,0.0000119873885,0.0015298122,0.0000026809057,0.000011439772,0.000009204198,0.0054357946,0.0000027251397,0.00014861271,0.9682029,0.023159279,0.0014839654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007758045,0.000018844621,0.0013824527,0.000012652134,0.0000053104955,9.859588e-7,0.00095284963,0.000023186974,0.000112051945,0.0057925587,0.99150175,0.00011976916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9820238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9644197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9683425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026618908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023583915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995944433","doi":"","title":"Professor Kate Glover Berger to join Osgoode faculty July 1 - Osgoode Hall Law School","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Join (topology); Focus (optics); Public law","score_opus":0.027923818787593306,"score_gpt":0.311179873882283,"score_spread":0.2832560550946897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995944433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03912112,0.0003382504,0.00030533734,0.028924173,0.00089418516,0.0012078225,0.00021130346,0.0005136754,0.92848414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9392671,0.000011444635,0.0013664616,0.036930952,0.0011994482,0.000086723616,0.00006958377,0.000047384725,0.02102089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693286,0.00034518077,0.0004739047,0.00065229496,0.0008378688,0.00075788447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981159,0.00007492087,0.00015409398,0.00036797175,0.00022306631,0.0010640688],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048345188,0.00030403954,0.00038368304,0.000041263185,0.0006626436,0.0004892794,0.0006661318,0.00024857378,0.0031944225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081611826,0.00027991514,0.00021521024,0.00047944637,0.00016930912,0.0013513712,0.00017121162,0.000580382,0.011385334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035388154,0.00019618137,0.0013705424,0.000108640146,0.00017539902,0.00009774522,0.052515075,0.00009538369,0.008907307,0.7322483,0.20293657,0.0009949523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007227385,0.00022650188,0.00063718,0.00011901369,0.00006136318,0.0000012567743,0.0016049073,0.00006839221,0.0056400066,0.0036667725,0.9866271,0.00062476145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06567203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10966678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90746325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022202027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025491515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001479785","doi":"","title":"Justin Trudeau News - What experts say Canada needs to do to become a leader in the electric vehicle industry","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Electric vehicle; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Automotive industry","score_opus":0.016855414931219233,"score_gpt":0.2987752596716087,"score_spread":0.28191984474038945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001479785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053516626,0.0021180639,0.000016463666,0.023354523,0.000652344,0.0004952684,0.0000027878216,0.00003282046,0.9679761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13088809,0.00006958642,0.000046531717,0.042361293,0.0008596345,0.000077556455,0.000010899925,0.00007056528,0.8256158],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985025,0.0002292581,0.00016908912,0.00023861662,0.00048498306,0.0003755611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994717,0.00008531758,0.000046434423,0.00022684304,0.000030884563,0.00013878984],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020517172,0.00015468904,0.0001970935,0.00023895691,0.00008377362,0.00036935252,0.00043005048,0.00035392813,0.01158967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017644383,0.000112329464,0.00004044843,0.0012927204,0.000015325264,0.00012693691,0.00003489977,0.0003334494,0.00003723299],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032764572,0.00001654343,0.00018987419,0.0000069229814,0.000010264724,0.0000318176,0.08845577,0.0000028234617,0.000055084543,0.0007159763,0.89160293,0.01890871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005395387,0.00001957331,0.00007712739,0.00012723896,0.000005779359,6.2360664e-7,0.1274364,0.0000025301601,0.000041704323,0.000004781888,0.87206453,0.00016574423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9688408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14236023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003473248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009723418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9893139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001960747","doi":"","title":"<em>Chevron</em> Abroad","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Chevron (anatomy); Agency (philosophy); Statutory law; Statute; Normative; Judicial review; Doctrine","score_opus":0.014084014311995604,"score_gpt":0.2774109907753754,"score_spread":0.26332697646337977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001960747","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22914827,0.0025654235,0.00047638273,0.006019758,0.0010433843,0.00053560914,0.000042715295,0.00054940715,0.75961906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97884053,0.00007592687,0.0006619054,0.009265496,0.0016006768,0.000029555044,0.000029994464,0.000032286778,0.009463653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976386,0.00025871434,0.0003502652,0.00047069267,0.0007318244,0.0005499321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878895,0.00009725584,0.00013106386,0.00029984605,0.00015335971,0.00052953215],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046581108,0.00021636226,0.00027894272,0.000041069212,0.00051652687,0.00043184435,0.00057967927,0.00021138387,0.006089368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007127947,0.00020970729,0.00018557673,0.00041774253,0.00017051696,0.00095905596,0.00009859728,0.00035949354,0.0041490695],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022361943,0.00023742922,0.0016632252,0.00012361469,0.0001999581,0.00021438835,0.24614827,0.00006800235,0.03141874,0.51516336,0.17656298,0.027976383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042510912,0.00012713467,0.0006553938,0.000044624794,0.000035837318,0.000001313857,0.0025908172,0.00016570659,0.0017918275,0.00088376575,0.9929224,0.00035603324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026594938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0139953885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81635946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014241185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019940615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7002401438","doi":"","title":"9781315436258_oachapterB2.pdf","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Key (lock); Constructed language; English language; Plain language","score_opus":0.01708223632627203,"score_gpt":0.31705862116455064,"score_spread":0.2999763848382786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7002401438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000099009085,0.000025997066,0.00045344429,0.002310258,0.0014502007,0.0005300946,1.10649e-8,0.00015876476,0.99506134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003553827,0.0003128935,0.00039408525,0.0014656533,0.0018192373,0.00007380646,0.00048477956,0.00019568173,0.99170005],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794644,0.00036996522,0.00027614966,0.00041967529,0.00062580296,0.00036193713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882245,0.00014097578,0.00030379492,0.00051756663,0.000109046894,0.00010614838],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000496692,0.00025347093,0.0002835112,0.0001252546,0.000527723,0.0005685132,0.0006853326,0.00025424798,0.9694094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022961845,0.00020742511,0.00017751197,0.00032366786,0.0002773514,0.00023720102,0.0001088477,0.00030723464,0.8479741],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044177177,0.000027337202,0.00004257554,0.000019495123,0.000095633775,0.000012044051,0.004627249,4.339468e-7,0.00001946802,0.017308537,0.003900554,0.9739423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013293464,0.000014243077,0.000056123197,0.00014401495,0.00006205081,0.0000025962822,0.0009008989,0.000012416711,0.000015164185,0.0003652026,0.9980247,0.00026962603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010740917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015010527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9941242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015574352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003937787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009329682","doi":"","title":"Documents and studies on 19th c. monetary history.: International monetary conferences. [2], Republication of Report of the Royal Commission on International Coinage together with the Minutes of Evidence and Appendix (London, 1868)","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Royal Commission; Index (typography); Commission; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.04131673459687574,"score_gpt":0.27222976922102526,"score_spread":0.23091303462414953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009329682","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18663813,0.016588228,0.001062189,0.029839942,0.0012233999,0.0014490703,0.0001400286,0.00004409055,0.7630149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86667585,0.0016088231,0.0008691859,0.00011398649,0.000028408595,0.00002302176,0.0001277298,0.00001607413,0.13053694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99529874,0.0024731879,0.00071988255,0.00047350366,0.00088651833,0.00014817115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99308944,0.0019897567,0.0019421052,0.0008243661,0.00208495,0.00006940313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003773823,0.00025609756,0.00038012452,0.0001397739,0.00022547958,0.000050424303,0.0010439679,0.000155062,0.00036062134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018092842,0.0001572626,0.00011327514,0.00014426373,0.0022943201,0.00031198387,0.00037274353,0.00032764845,0.0000036412323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000547526,0.0013036516,0.04483821,0.00055938837,0.0014494363,0.000017490738,0.2544784,0.0000848345,0.0012320512,0.62752724,0.02011788,0.047843926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025624519,0.000106929365,0.09160199,0.03759158,0.0010037948,0.00007298262,0.008790778,0.01016441,0.043066204,0.006360945,0.7972533,0.0014246106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074683167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031137713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77713543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021821949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003702583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99914104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7026855105","doi":"","title":"Best of the Best: North shore athletes honoured","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Diafiltration; Liquation; Dysgeusia; Triacetin; Fusible alloy; Emperipolesis","score_opus":0.007456269102237447,"score_gpt":0.19736285244595536,"score_spread":0.1899065833437179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7026855105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17214468,0.018352238,0.000002569725,0.0018553737,0.00058964535,0.00079254195,0.000037163634,0.0001839151,0.8060419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9651889,0.0029254025,0.00007121924,0.0008748755,0.00088835787,0.000038149497,0.000025285924,0.00003408763,0.029953687],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781156,0.00030594418,0.00032155588,0.0003081643,0.00039258428,0.000860174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921995,0.0001566532,0.00015845126,0.00030413683,0.00004868616,0.00011211233],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014568308,0.00011012033,0.00022628559,0.00001752306,0.00063086284,0.00056443055,0.000711514,0.0001281419,0.064396806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007544304,0.00015104799,0.00019431955,0.0006849833,0.00030436853,0.001092357,0.000120226876,0.0003768896,0.0000590092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027154148,0.0007748516,0.27277407,0.00005666795,0.00026090455,0.000060156737,0.01816692,0.00026648838,0.0000076060132,0.086512946,0.34841472,0.2726775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010797523,0.0010722976,0.004393258,0.0008514979,0.00019424305,0.00003180023,0.001520158,0.0024271084,0.00006484597,0.12633435,0.86099786,0.0010328249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016264413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34001163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79304427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006955244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023734145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99028635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027558605","doi":"","title":"De l'interprétation des textes législatifs plurilingues : Comparaison d'études portant sur la jurisprudence en Suisse, au Canada et dans l'Union européenne","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); Freedom of information","score_opus":0.0072905335967546935,"score_gpt":0.24466376446908578,"score_spread":0.2373732308723311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027558605","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8573372,0.0003704442,0.011980503,0.00022667735,0.0005693231,0.0003133034,0.0002491322,0.000046083802,0.12890737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746601,0.0006626915,0.00451234,0.00010566554,0.00014955587,9.886343e-7,0.0008649647,0.000038774186,0.019004915],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641293,0.0014364222,0.00036538273,0.0005697652,0.0006520827,0.00056343124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974267,0.0008905698,0.00061659387,0.00029835297,0.0005054703,0.00026231137],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007829573,0.0003983346,0.00051547855,0.0002404663,0.0009128036,0.000066607936,0.0009012664,0.0002442571,0.00031371045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003963225,0.0005002566,0.00022997474,0.0004209682,0.0009194295,0.0007529728,0.00011689811,0.0004002355,0.000022588076],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003281877,0.00021105583,0.025532186,0.00033626708,0.00033364494,0.0001698537,0.90197307,0.0003687315,0.014085523,0.040168095,0.0019274964,0.014565898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010054982,0.0008131099,0.51112974,0.0026907308,0.0007448013,0.000015479814,0.32677934,0.02917943,0.003955149,0.0021595052,0.12005051,0.001476705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94612604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5751937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00097529864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045157373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029556294","doi":"","title":"La formation professionnelle et technique au Québec : un aperçu","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"other","venue":"Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Term (time); Work (physics); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.011255985159624103,"score_gpt":0.26211549941562473,"score_spread":0.2508595142560006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029556294","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0114266,0.0057673305,0.004419064,0.027272003,0.00034048918,0.0013807333,0.000236851,0.00025362035,0.9489033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54721844,0.000580868,0.0011276172,0.002190445,0.00061214465,0.0005324779,0.000099876444,0.00019568433,0.44744244],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99388105,0.0019740395,0.0009238265,0.0007452211,0.0018593965,0.000616475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916036,0.0063299267,0.0010253475,0.00047160097,0.0001813308,0.00038820584],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015929041,0.00072068715,0.0006133627,0.0009317781,0.00066004536,0.00041285198,0.0010948229,0.00045486295,0.02665938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046540764,0.0006655495,0.000370931,0.0011482377,0.00085266324,0.0018939291,0.00046007268,0.0009445072,0.0016331958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028958303,0.0011452155,0.009410761,0.0006370394,0.00045477436,0.000056971214,0.4226176,0.00008325458,0.0015478192,0.11169463,0.44122592,0.010836402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007716365,0.00018485494,0.0050700656,0.00096018077,0.00012351407,0.000042141815,0.0041830703,0.0004929286,0.00048743407,0.00067586906,0.98620075,0.0008075728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8118246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99776775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5449748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018963482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13814917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043065087","doi":"","title":"Reforming the advocacy rules in Canadian charity law: Legislative amendments, judicial action or administrative discretion?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Legislature; Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Limiting; Action (physics); Revenue; Doctrine","score_opus":0.05495224973657405,"score_gpt":0.34712228113445076,"score_spread":0.29217003139787673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043065087","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34218317,0.000094305906,1.9513169e-7,0.00007008353,0.0011889394,0.0009223581,0.0005675534,0.000071892784,0.6549015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805906,0.00023134121,0.000054293017,0.00041508736,0.00016242001,0.00023357959,0.0009004813,0.00006199455,0.017350206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960485,0.0008733225,0.0006944711,0.00071128254,0.00076892006,0.0009034757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812055,0.00019627782,0.0005787404,0.00035895148,0.0003395287,0.00040593825],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014219636,0.00048210623,0.00045991578,0.00033572115,0.003135243,0.00019331931,0.00069277553,0.0007055186,0.001391217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000860534,0.00038086015,0.00020807692,0.00052453834,0.00024304641,0.0021290223,0.00003292808,0.0014966249,0.00017939387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096468953,0.00022970013,0.000099728764,0.000103760576,0.00023410979,0.00015944852,0.026674837,0.0000019792888,0.00093849987,0.8427552,0.000008405551,0.12782963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018007196,0.00091461185,0.005366739,0.002096612,0.0005435789,0.00001651725,0.14054765,0.00003608939,0.025460834,0.08665504,0.73343,0.0031315875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91440713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7561002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002550071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010776892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043896981","doi":"","title":"Thermodynamics and crystal chemistry of rhomboclase, (H<sub>5</sub>O<sub>2</sub>)Fe(SO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>·2H<sub>2</sub>O, and the phase (H<sub>3</sub>O)Fe(SO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub> and implications for acid mine drainage","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Crystal (programming language); Acid mine drainage; Phase (matter); Crystal chemistry; Crystal structure; Chemical thermodynamics; Drainage","score_opus":0.016291463030414784,"score_gpt":0.2677770103862502,"score_spread":0.2514855473558354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043896981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88307023,0.01603858,0.0031462805,0.005054016,0.0028166615,0.016672388,0.027010884,0.0025916994,0.04359928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94921106,0.0204025,0.0018663801,0.0010478437,0.0040477295,0.0006021106,0.0066030254,0.0028856376,0.0133337155],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9313439,0.008376139,0.010604046,0.015860854,0.017573755,0.016241288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9401643,0.007531112,0.01435752,0.014489192,0.012908032,0.010549837],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021470077,0.012311222,0.014380789,0.008777712,0.021302016,0.006139651,0.021785997,0.0107282195,0.0043887603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00764624,0.013903279,0.008981383,0.011912607,0.028480781,0.0115184905,0.013933442,0.010983403,0.0032632048],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018190043,0.007960599,0.0035546424,0.00471182,0.008989971,0.0041547976,0.05258917,0.00043953152,0.8246307,0.008500812,0.040004816,0.026273094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.14132011,0.015822044,0.027921304,0.017407704,0.028939063,0.004364273,0.12345022,0.038342565,0.2499677,0.018005835,0.27735418,0.057105005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029067819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04953896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57466304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069811614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009583079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100433106","doi":"","title":"Rpr1, a gene required for Rpg1-dependent resistance to stem rust in barley. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 113: 847–855","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stem rust; Puccinia; Gene; Chromosome; Plant disease resistance; Mutation; Genetic analysis","score_opus":0.008469476422918402,"score_gpt":0.27089277437350484,"score_spread":0.26242329795058644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100433106","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5301769,0.0006738425,0.02335645,0.0022401316,0.0001618375,0.0013115335,0.000029154544,0.000088596775,0.44196156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859429,0.000018899951,0.005694262,0.00055850815,0.00018412637,0.00008161395,0.0000059243384,0.000011656676,0.007502087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989037,0.00006023475,0.00023409277,0.00026570656,0.0002445583,0.00029172938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958324,0.00011428951,0.000036324494,0.00012783651,0.000050858132,0.000087419954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045879176,0.00009378645,0.0001431635,0.000056168665,0.00013670723,0.00011064628,0.00014310985,0.000095712225,0.00010670334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044846693,0.0000837368,0.00002926006,0.00013327156,0.00014154818,0.000084209336,0.000034041997,0.00005242163,0.000015110232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016411523,0.00004630733,0.0007714604,0.000015768364,0.0000060147245,0.0000047359877,0.011711832,0.000019541123,0.007282743,0.9742824,0.0012487993,0.0044463077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0099049695,0.0010560801,0.024881344,0.00034645342,0.00024219332,0.000007102488,0.05997169,0.0024263568,0.2925421,0.20577398,0.3988773,0.003970455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005636221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012388733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7685084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009410291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057638168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6913204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7113426770","doi":"","title":"Finance for the Common Good","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Capital (architecture); Function (biology); Capital market; Financial capital; Quarter (Canadian coin); Economic capital","score_opus":0.011454442311130507,"score_gpt":0.29601153846518924,"score_spread":0.2845570961540587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7113426770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016444907,0.024163514,0.0040102084,0.02459427,0.005774387,0.0020873572,0.00011117339,0.00011102721,0.92270315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9317666,0.00050987164,0.00021114577,0.007833477,0.0006196119,0.0001569666,0.000008714115,0.00001355292,0.058880012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816054,0.0002262118,0.00040987262,0.00038636578,0.0003064888,0.0005104995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998223,0.00087009085,0.00016393725,0.00049582345,0.00016642922,0.00008068362],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008478558,0.00020586111,0.0002737918,0.000034603207,0.0017256057,0.0004972477,0.00082874554,0.00020988313,0.0006897358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040043629,0.00015884553,0.00026739962,0.0004927737,0.00042650712,0.0005659154,0.00010664409,0.00037545335,0.0002892847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076520286,0.000075644675,0.00041083863,0.000052324704,0.00008439861,0.0000023436583,0.008323065,0.000039640418,0.00009005597,0.9458451,0.018447783,0.02655228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047463813,0.00010703247,0.00063764164,0.00020263618,0.00012082882,3.1179877e-7,0.0019561432,0.0011288729,0.0011237025,0.011376357,0.9826678,0.00020406132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013294437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02690932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015639616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032094127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7118817543","doi":"10.54389/bfea8387","title":"A Right to Explanation for Algorithmic Credit Decisions in the UK","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"˜The œproceedings of sliit international conference on advancements in science and humanities","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Transparency (behavior); Process (computing); Accountability; Statutory law; Financial services; Credit card; Misrepresentation","score_opus":0.0492433805445838,"score_gpt":0.3656328452474607,"score_spread":0.3163894647028769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7118817543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30085105,0.00019434979,0.0009769743,0.008070759,0.0019116624,0.0021303955,0.00009751223,0.000013535271,0.68575376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993229,0.00043198513,0.00026088284,0.0024253807,0.00013482332,0.00026680154,0.0000047949247,0.000004466601,0.0032418757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972795,0.000020636884,0.0005738622,0.00046343682,0.0013018533,0.000360701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770445,0.00038216222,0.00024370725,0.00010710683,0.0015241868,0.000038384806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024492466,0.00018298018,0.00020327388,0.0008908023,0.00076498196,0.00083090196,0.0017018361,0.00005808197,0.00018676912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007238144,0.00012927668,0.000045796285,0.0009272318,0.0010726667,0.0012947723,0.00016055595,0.00021136519,0.000005175882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012919605,0.00010718558,0.00054246356,0.000015918127,0.000012386573,5.841316e-7,0.068580315,0.00000857943,0.0011698788,0.91705024,0.0007224639,0.011660765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002343979,0.0011888482,0.008599238,0.0030139468,0.0000587274,0.0000023104024,0.5249574,0.010643643,0.0025474369,0.324537,0.121429004,0.0006784544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004286104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018043584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.692378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034454395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003080862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8012407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125757963","doi":"10.1515/9781773855196-081","title":"9.7 Why ‘Liberal’ and ‘Conservative’ Are Unhelpful Terms in Canadian Courts","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation; Work (physics); Subject (documents); Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.017089426874906537,"score_gpt":0.21724890911765773,"score_spread":0.2001594822427512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125757963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031750132,0.0011730953,0.00001792843,0.00043964834,0.0002944351,0.0005617526,0.00015518095,0.0000288083,0.99415416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14995709,0.0006452195,0.000094854164,0.0010199249,0.00008467959,6.754542e-7,0.000031719774,0.00004083486,0.848125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818325,0.00011369776,0.0002893554,0.00057662616,0.00036865304,0.00046843386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877167,0.000105730884,0.0002588865,0.00024515693,0.00015686516,0.00046169024],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025045735,0.00034829305,0.00052571885,0.00042751216,0.00031448106,0.00009765468,0.0004291588,0.00057300506,0.00061253813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018845245,0.0004219147,0.00017374844,0.00002087522,0.0011109049,0.00031726414,0.00018444535,0.00060629525,0.000019869773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001517783,0.000017044926,0.0006333874,0.00038956464,0.00026509122,0.0018151482,0.11561485,0.0000028258137,0.000028213955,0.8715229,0.0014002485,0.008158956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004015716,0.000101051824,0.0005574871,0.0014896118,0.00021073439,0.000005157019,0.0015456817,0.00056411535,0.000036714766,0.0048861355,0.9896926,0.0005090989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8912984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94218016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9882924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036200526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004562801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132927986","doi":"","title":"Models of democratic dialogue the justification for judicial review","year":2004,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada; Canadian Heritage","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Legislature; Democracy; Charter; Constitution; Dialogic; Democratic theory","score_opus":0.04027160308365091,"score_gpt":0.4047744276622828,"score_spread":0.36450282457863187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132927986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021832485,0.3195277,0.11426385,0.029761028,0.010285594,0.026785852,0.00022113642,0.00020290904,0.47711945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9611214,0.023703653,0.00032102445,0.0008346664,0.00065965496,0.00047086706,0.00097984,0.00004137121,0.011867539],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977153,0.00028906474,0.0007347436,0.00037836138,0.0005702694,0.00031228742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974642,0.0003557711,0.0010440265,0.00035741262,0.00070858246,0.00007004413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011035006,0.00026826156,0.00054063293,0.00006625007,0.0005815727,0.00005840165,0.00052982423,0.0003021525,0.00019905817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001000205,0.00020628757,0.00036928276,0.00046601892,0.00016884293,0.0003035882,0.000014247161,0.0002456708,0.000028919338],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019324767,0.00017666935,0.0000018211874,0.008650126,0.0001681454,8.8424457e-7,0.85943496,0.0011674173,0.0013442802,0.100059494,0.0054003,0.023402622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003974853,0.0025213403,0.00029596346,0.09580647,0.017605439,0.000006685005,0.48260757,0.046043452,0.018813644,0.26771396,0.0598516,0.0047589894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067599565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040956764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9392889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015129695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010074612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135481431","doi":"","title":"Multilingualism in International Law and EU Law, Vol. III:Case law of the European Court of Justice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Multilingualism; European Union law; Economic Justice; Common law; Scots law; Comparative law","score_opus":0.0292221195768003,"score_gpt":0.3059812032545961,"score_spread":0.2767590836777958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135481431","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007991794,0.001494427,0.000072874136,0.00046383374,0.00014719025,0.0007368895,0.00023378397,0.0000116347965,0.98884755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50465083,0.00016510481,0.0000809407,0.00006210421,0.000033455406,3.6861234e-8,0.00002293792,0.000011232701,0.49497333],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962867,0.0015564442,0.00028897356,0.0003683916,0.0011695632,0.00032996424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99698186,0.0006295999,0.00052696007,0.00049960846,0.0012262447,0.00013574999],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029674582,0.00018737107,0.0004725778,0.00016313956,0.0011005717,0.000029406083,0.0018213012,0.00022774271,0.038110077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018350386,0.00018665979,0.00023713644,0.00032178903,0.0048900177,0.00052614947,0.0012313732,0.0005888354,0.00072545116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012470374,0.0003357782,0.0000013150393,0.00073783495,0.000580612,0.0019743664,0.32717812,0.00020001108,0.0012584816,0.28038722,0.38474426,0.0013549799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014556096,0.00012093072,0.000060595645,0.0006022292,0.0002171633,0.000012289168,0.036843184,0.00007856112,0.0006301409,0.00012431045,0.9596641,0.00019089968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07203669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13044316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5749198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007177652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010806745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135601574","doi":"","title":"Language and Legal Interpretation in International Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Interpretation (philosophy); Customary international law; International Legal English Certificate; Legal research; Principle of legality; Comparative law; International legal system; Public law","score_opus":0.019600212050488317,"score_gpt":0.2997106941019101,"score_spread":0.28011048205142175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135601574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008768566,0.0034827993,0.00008466679,0.0008771168,0.00011586234,0.0006230198,0.0001518344,0.000020406762,0.9858757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30928746,0.00038083643,0.00006146681,0.000034113917,0.000026768012,1.4278245e-7,0.0001338855,0.000011334978,0.690064],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968676,0.0010818681,0.00017780685,0.0003889403,0.0011501482,0.00033363418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984182,0.00054655236,0.00026186838,0.00032766603,0.00032074566,0.00012496658],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002064994,0.00015625806,0.00035512363,0.00032650022,0.0010992332,0.000053082476,0.0014200907,0.00020433412,0.46131855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001222398,0.00018983697,0.00016131539,0.00033565928,0.0015042297,0.0007731607,0.0010787861,0.00069585495,0.0050816797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008674559,0.00006896413,0.0000013060429,0.00009050335,0.00017489518,0.0004905264,0.17929806,0.00002749746,0.00031101156,0.021684716,0.7913081,0.0056769573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005465612,0.00011806886,0.00013480525,0.00012293449,0.00004546002,0.000002887133,0.0639454,0.00014544712,0.000047148587,0.00003932327,0.9346949,0.00015709449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026159985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06233399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45623687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011945643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008529577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99569297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135677223","doi":"","title":"The European Court of Justice, the European Central Bank, and the Supremacy of EU Law:Special Issue","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"European union; European commission; Constitutional court; Work (physics); European Union law","score_opus":0.0188033257208091,"score_gpt":0.2722505615409507,"score_spread":0.25344723582014156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135677223","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008220277,0.0039130915,0.00010599797,0.0040126336,0.00018468784,0.0011853693,0.00021231128,0.000015122575,0.98954874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20065579,0.0026565006,0.000020983542,0.000047325266,0.00045938318,7.3774984e-8,0.000020807718,0.000024813768,0.7961143],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892993,0.007796318,0.0003478113,0.0003967503,0.0015543248,0.00060549605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99432576,0.0027879386,0.000755044,0.0009148062,0.0010299181,0.00018654657],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009258812,0.0002506381,0.00055784726,0.00010794674,0.003684919,0.00007769402,0.0037887213,0.00014768408,0.07433333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038959342,0.00015581194,0.00038575145,0.0003408471,0.010860342,0.00044295957,0.0016447946,0.00065577094,0.0061303154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009090536,0.00003633458,4.6540853e-7,0.000114332914,0.00030625024,0.000053403175,0.06476311,0.000003829305,0.00015860796,0.024549283,0.90229595,0.006809363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012422253,0.00012990377,0.00047821968,0.00025054862,0.00038981249,0.0000021166506,0.027308498,0.000014032054,0.00011177153,0.000090553054,0.9698197,0.00016258184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005727984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010946723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19983377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030155294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085809635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135759491","doi":"","title":"Multilingualism in International Law and EU Law, Vol. II:Case law of the International Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Human rights; International human rights law; European Union law; International court; Scots law; Public international law","score_opus":0.025132337290389866,"score_gpt":0.30459758572935597,"score_spread":0.2794652484389661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135759491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037559427,0.00091935357,0.000032013155,0.0008877635,0.00013539815,0.00070900895,0.00025485715,0.0000071129666,0.95949507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62646455,0.000106654676,0.000058654485,0.000046751662,0.00003543263,6.414657e-8,0.000025551932,0.000008351119,0.373254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966297,0.0012963874,0.000320377,0.00031650628,0.0012034549,0.0002335561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968878,0.00071062864,0.000631407,0.00040501362,0.001273057,0.0000920706],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033626324,0.00017171279,0.00046131288,0.00015481726,0.0015126568,0.000030390745,0.0018749769,0.00017061434,0.016595973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014301622,0.00014240836,0.0002011674,0.0002038305,0.0073475232,0.00044908578,0.0015064897,0.00049320963,0.00010384364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014050141,0.00026883342,0.0000018981292,0.0003528743,0.0006913958,0.0005428891,0.22989936,0.00007274726,0.0011522514,0.6149932,0.15021397,0.0004055191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038279959,0.00020312813,0.00014047348,0.0008105281,0.00039750093,0.000020126454,0.02773418,0.00023003337,0.0011427195,0.0007421415,0.96452326,0.00022790358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06817067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12639622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8143093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004170854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048637704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135970361","doi":"","title":"The new French model of constitutional review","year":2008,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.06918215873215401,"score_gpt":0.3112056410272481,"score_spread":0.24202348229509413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135970361","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015995352,0.090651974,0.00461183,0.0077176243,0.00013764486,0.0016151251,0.0002517581,0.000022671473,0.878996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45236957,0.028062042,0.00021377658,0.000045413315,0.000024009552,6.003127e-8,0.000018717526,0.0000058212877,0.5192606],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99516654,0.001553814,0.00034403446,0.00041496722,0.0019107382,0.0006099152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959475,0.0010371443,0.00054030336,0.000740653,0.0014086097,0.00032580202],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029640559,0.00021130806,0.0005884011,0.00012747635,0.004215453,0.00002324765,0.0025732089,0.00019939298,0.25325474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043734658,0.00019313757,0.0004549525,0.0012103246,0.009246667,0.0007779545,0.0009415607,0.0005409387,0.019748086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030191807,0.00009805429,0.0000032229434,0.00023303775,0.00023409961,0.000054403183,0.030268686,0.00021269333,0.00111692,0.006624939,0.95927167,0.0015803389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084407657,0.00023654594,0.0003887322,0.0008514952,0.0002190909,0.00000721652,0.011646078,0.0014618151,0.0007937869,0.000040088136,0.9832959,0.00021518054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012548124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003419792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43637422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042137256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004015348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135999126","doi":"","title":"Drafting Proper Short Titles:Do States Have the Answer?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Quarter (Canadian coin); Politics; Process (computing); Style (visual arts); Plain language","score_opus":0.0568988737933066,"score_gpt":0.3577561118185657,"score_spread":0.3008572380252591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135999126","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49471563,0.00029509596,0.00014908341,0.00046779864,0.00006636291,0.00018987285,0.0000135982555,0.000014306948,0.5040882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773362,0.00013140253,0.00003885746,0.000026957267,0.00012254035,4.129021e-7,0.000016255784,0.000005846737,0.022321526],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984192,0.0002843656,0.000074179574,0.00012838683,0.0006916555,0.0004021671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993972,0.00013744761,0.00003441349,0.00016210802,0.00016430288,0.000104517516],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015078642,0.000057349644,0.00008978531,0.00007863004,0.00063893374,0.000093339695,0.00034678204,0.00005501213,0.0011445166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000117169366,0.000045913832,0.00008047667,0.00018986358,0.000660161,0.001662169,0.0001226516,0.00022674081,0.00007487469],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012368249,0.0002748634,0.1265161,0.00004849738,0.00014198263,0.00006693507,0.7621529,0.000011225745,0.0011361869,0.0769533,0.0147960605,0.01777827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018315481,0.00011930237,0.03096241,0.000081674945,0.0000288892,0.000002202658,0.8468778,0.00013056255,0.00037230965,0.0005755067,0.12044721,0.00021896293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012283728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006868627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48262057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045805235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017058637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161308614","doi":"10.7202/1125047ar","title":"Putting Practice into Theory: Ruth Sullivan’s Contribution to Legislative Scholarship, Practice, and Teaching","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legislation; Interpretation (philosophy); Scholarship; Citation; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.012330954898794313,"score_gpt":0.3845760872051047,"score_spread":0.3722451323063104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161308614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015149602,0.18330376,0.0046906574,0.04919135,0.0003807489,0.0009606117,0.000006010274,0.00018092009,0.76113445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9504645,0.011434443,0.009825263,0.026183223,0.0005200885,0.00007372324,0.00002015547,0.000027769554,0.001450861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655664,0.0022463691,0.00028778703,0.00031582772,0.00035230082,0.00024104827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739146,0.001950102,0.0001397609,0.0001468982,0.00023849682,0.00013326158],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009910362,0.00012538616,0.00021403753,0.000039891675,0.0005806661,0.0006111851,0.00014111133,0.0000704142,0.000119661774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028580762,0.00010464629,0.00006349585,0.0002111041,0.00008545456,0.003364497,0.000053712338,0.000435292,0.000240677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059648964,0.000013397703,0.0000058734518,0.00023566931,0.00003319945,0.000019827914,0.016488448,1.2057612e-7,0.00004007084,0.83866453,0.00063449575,0.14385839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004771171,0.000049824488,0.0000043608406,0.003913464,0.00017881735,0.000011911849,0.00070546457,0.0000073392534,0.000035250225,0.004837261,0.99008703,0.000121547506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026413344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067682203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98945254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017791802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011604657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9796019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161942306","doi":"10.82308/17782","title":"Reforming the advocacy rules in Canadian charity law: Legislative amendments, judicial action or administrative discretion?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Legislature; Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Limiting; Action (physics); Revenue; Doctrine","score_opus":0.07515314114975656,"score_gpt":0.4077364586359134,"score_spread":0.3325833174861568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161942306","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042066332,0.000075983204,0.0000206388,0.00036421482,0.0008513977,0.00068269134,0.00004200916,0.000035071942,0.9558617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.939438,0.0001132707,0.00003457535,0.0003063229,0.00028761057,0.0001029116,0.00061215804,0.000015013222,0.059090126],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983877,0.00025227538,0.00031180665,0.00028729733,0.00034354965,0.00041737058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992694,0.00007329833,0.00022657978,0.00013865186,0.00013920883,0.00015284387],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049219414,0.0001960675,0.00020424135,0.00014798887,0.0008103819,0.00013934803,0.00028419198,0.00029906267,0.0029601015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017229801,0.00012874363,0.000078913654,0.0002127611,0.00015088596,0.0007891558,0.0000067679384,0.0004272593,0.00007090843],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031338303,0.00005740663,0.00021174384,0.000022984137,0.000057421283,0.000023334307,0.79586625,2.7938094e-7,0.000029324301,0.18859051,0.00022608045,0.014601305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005897709,0.00041521,0.008360057,0.0006388819,0.0001636926,0.0000021934172,0.7527105,0.0000738211,0.0023612923,0.011803276,0.22179145,0.0010898527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98804307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89737165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071673933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025410324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W71792753","doi":"","title":"All Originals: Fiction and reality of multilingual legal drafting in the European Union and Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Cadmus - EUI Research Repository (European University Institute)","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European union; Art; Engineering; Political science; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.03599440214163162,"score_gpt":0.336226350933647,"score_spread":0.30023194879201537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W71792753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51238394,0.00016202401,0.0000036199442,0.00011049612,0.00021407686,0.00019822585,0.0000057102247,0.000015023719,0.48690686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890714,0.00041691965,0.000014819788,0.000029731355,0.00026462003,2.8016518e-7,0.000119924385,0.000012202999,0.010070094],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916077,0.006664618,0.0002714361,0.0003893055,0.0007502105,0.00031670422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886113,0.00021373497,0.00019009174,0.00023794075,0.00036325306,0.00013382109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004944271,0.00015548378,0.00018648259,0.00025034547,0.00096520345,0.00017847533,0.00045719344,0.000096767064,0.0000025304003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005783915,0.00014894569,0.000042571395,0.00029672185,0.00038493492,0.0005289587,0.00006099382,0.0008035656,0.0000014086803],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000971593,0.00048636392,0.005684572,0.0009993778,0.0002778718,0.020837462,0.75400573,0.0001434595,0.008222132,0.02335794,0.011614334,0.17339917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006029453,0.00015299555,0.09243587,0.0005598438,0.00007303511,0.000028442599,0.08229704,0.000047088928,0.00050830713,0.000009989356,0.8229159,0.00036851503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8907596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8706025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8113016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046857866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010870433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74236625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W77205514","doi":"","title":"Legislative Drafting Program Provides Global Reach","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislator; Legislature; Legislative assembly; Legislation; Civility; Political science; Law; Public administration; General assembly; Order (exchange); Element (criminal law); Business; Politics","score_opus":0.014989043337821863,"score_gpt":0.34855293952227734,"score_spread":0.3335638961844555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W77205514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006198999,0.03230401,0.0000056465306,0.011280322,0.00063670595,0.0018075175,0.000054952136,0.000114703886,0.94759715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9599804,0.007495682,0.00276254,0.026126346,0.00087222503,0.00035338744,0.00016336497,0.000022580436,0.002223438],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988853,0.00013197298,0.00019872416,0.00020659147,0.00018893841,0.00038851748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992311,0.00002457151,0.000072876224,0.00017299702,0.000067867695,0.00043056355],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004775735,0.00010508049,0.00016461237,0.000027064845,0.00031491788,0.00010766556,0.00023747385,0.000060507195,0.0015518768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026495807,0.00009732444,0.00007951196,0.0002759126,0.00015135,0.00041407897,0.000011704637,0.00018717034,0.0001724502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010251853,0.00001514178,0.004983365,0.00013296504,0.000019206725,0.00002438812,0.007590846,2.785207e-8,0.000011328752,0.0046436987,0.012949381,0.96962863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043317184,0.000027731696,0.0003525049,0.00049237505,0.000032410207,0.0000030813117,0.00039170982,0.0000052313476,0.0000074461104,0.00008549872,0.9984338,0.00012488695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70625675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95904666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9854844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034557903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009696328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}