{"meta":{"query_hash":"2ee5566a521c","filters":{"topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes"},"cohort_total":780,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":780,"exported":780,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2ee5566a521c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Legal+Systems+and+Judicial+Processes"},"results":[{"id":"W1000343132","doi":"","title":"James Madison Has Left the Building","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University of Chicago Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliamentary sovereignty; Nullification; Law; Legislation; Political science; Statutory law; State (computer science); Democracy; Judicial review; Constitution; Legislature; Sovereignty; Federalism; Politics","score_opus":0.02876443821679884,"score_gpt":0.2704875496667374,"score_spread":0.24172311144993855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1000343132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014279865,0.050474685,0.001267016,0.21437559,0.03164971,0.000056572782,0.00045411816,0.0004159797,0.6998784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006454697,0.009708558,0.0005492968,0.02354535,0.0019567737,0.00002239224,0.00010485823,0.00010065737,0.95755744],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834,0.00022755927,0.000063052714,0.00038573428,0.00075631693,0.00022728469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974955,0.00048299038,0.00010186699,0.00019955014,0.0007271949,0.0009929201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013200251,0.00056427094,0.0004632061,0.0011397977,0.004460771,0.005416848,0.0007696603,0.004014766,0.19618611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047055646,0.0003813559,0.00031595185,0.0006819353,0.0015042159,0.0020684386,0.0021111148,0.004244974,0.0913435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018125307,0.000018534392,0.00031695425,0.000048752558,0.0000049132373,0.00010472256,0.00009789846,0.000025409992,0.00015357266,0.022417651,0.9076737,0.0691198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.016684e-7,0.0000024865822,0.000109654015,0.000032125154,0.0000010099286,0.000025472706,0.000025681209,0.0000065502913,0.00003819186,0.0005517503,0.99920386,0.0000023487278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020842373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059273515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19618611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030664008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062102377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65630794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1019748629","doi":"","title":"Compensation for mental injury under the Montreal Convention: A paradigm shift","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European transport law: = Droit européen des transports = Europäisches Transportrecht = Diritto europeo dei trasporti = Derecho europeo de transportes = Europees vervoerrecht","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Paradigm shift; Compensation (psychology); Convention; Law; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.024697993521142266,"score_gpt":0.2624626091592792,"score_spread":0.23776461563813694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1019748629","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028899476,0.013053124,0.004861764,0.8035105,0.0028830613,0.00011441421,0.00026689563,0.000054840282,0.14635593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8367368,0.010039763,0.0048058773,0.11389674,0.0058332635,0.00019272997,0.00018753267,0.000079912046,0.028227312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96610117,0.012475311,0.0013442213,0.004028772,0.009597966,0.0064524836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.964217,0.016933963,0.0024667536,0.0021390729,0.009695086,0.004548127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034988597,0.0006318177,0.0009209688,0.004024802,0.010935228,0.024615137,0.0069506806,0.019454874,0.00876991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049826406,0.0006401138,0.0010953248,0.0033153016,0.035488654,0.013318825,0.0065665822,0.01467862,0.0005575117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001693059,0.000038002676,0.001124202,0.00005469938,0.000013717767,0.00004235431,0.0021770957,0.00028458552,0.000085335596,0.96204895,0.019489253,0.014624988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015345975,0.00015183732,0.023766635,0.0019265714,0.00006694813,0.00022515515,0.010872192,0.0029012007,0.0006728753,0.5165892,0.4423181,0.00035572724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5834574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64738125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5834574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.074348934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15801142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83799136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1020271015","doi":"","title":"Guide to MC001 - The Walter L. Oblinger, Jr. Papers","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.014557796429054007,"score_gpt":0.31423674029238896,"score_spread":0.29967894386333493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1020271015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002519434,0.0073978333,0.0013483831,0.0058711376,0.0062004384,0.00030974738,0.0095293885,0.0016230817,0.96746796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005332557,0.0038279446,0.0005796745,0.00086883403,0.0004091976,0.00008169682,0.0022486304,0.00037311058,0.99107754],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845886,0.00011605409,0.000087279346,0.00020425375,0.0009864372,0.00014708395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977488,0.00019771744,0.000090763424,0.00021143418,0.0012787854,0.0004725272],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016217337,0.0013994217,0.0009723248,0.003410689,0.0021106647,0.005711209,0.0016560843,0.0016395475,0.6093289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006155118,0.00077973487,0.0005011289,0.0031109273,0.00055367616,0.0038590278,0.0024078395,0.002754097,0.61299694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004221585,0.000012472375,0.000045009292,0.000025410884,3.2679475e-7,0.0000090484655,0.000019402707,0.000012078384,0.000030931427,0.0013084145,0.9581074,0.040425222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.45675e-7,0.0000022924569,0.000087400236,0.000033545002,2.0591875e-7,0.000011199336,0.000011216951,0.000005373546,0.000011619263,0.00013259552,0.99970275,0.0000011347121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019107983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04249938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6093289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025032167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056844917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5572449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1024819059","doi":"","title":"The Disturbed Legislation of Same-sex Marriage in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"读与写:教育教学刊","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.027184488699442916,"score_gpt":0.24566679797267707,"score_spread":0.21848230927323414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1024819059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81639665,0.00468759,0.00094970694,0.08055038,0.00065217266,0.00026195188,0.0008809781,0.00007052828,0.09554998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9512797,0.0011180553,0.00044377372,0.011433478,0.000071964365,0.00005094426,0.00013763519,0.000033644686,0.035430785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828592,0.0016388156,0.00059449644,0.0011878846,0.004488623,0.009230967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97947,0.005498978,0.0015184112,0.0006669394,0.0081815645,0.004664261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072499206,0.0002647245,0.0009217713,0.0028497144,0.04113009,0.011196524,0.005226325,0.009778699,0.0072368393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028421821,0.0013221974,0.0009414209,0.004742946,0.010806887,0.0019656396,0.0047369716,0.013413911,0.00034365448],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037886118,0.00040901478,0.09314654,0.00030904973,0.00022849037,0.003339458,0.0767821,0.0038860294,0.002388017,0.7006274,0.070337616,0.048167545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028677884,0.00023464694,0.3821523,0.00071294996,0.00031724037,0.00078389276,0.106108464,0.0051520974,0.0029056876,0.024395859,0.4762631,0.0006868909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99717295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22930545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22930545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3822348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89389646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1038600807","doi":"","title":"Unnatural Law: Rethinking Canadian Environmental Law and Policy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.0073172990539150445,"score_gpt":0.19330297224360196,"score_spread":0.18598567318968692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1038600807","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050663285,0.006923204,0.017142816,0.49572754,0.002506897,0.0001666172,0.0007047586,0.00033887694,0.42582598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84117806,0.006082955,0.018128356,0.04522454,0.0006929451,0.00015308845,0.00036376037,0.0005229484,0.08765336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826241,0.003675052,0.00042031312,0.0016391362,0.007478792,0.0041626706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9693338,0.0113468915,0.0008317269,0.0027715678,0.012834196,0.002881804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018956387,0.0007804649,0.00080293434,0.006021769,0.031596005,0.027684117,0.0053269397,0.008779661,0.01551524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059325106,0.0008158311,0.0008320747,0.007933733,0.045486115,0.012965082,0.0073790923,0.012133142,0.00062700757],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012235159,0.000012334579,0.00090938737,0.000038958828,0.000008163271,0.000040360377,0.009612646,0.000747484,0.000078241384,0.9341765,0.037760537,0.016603177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002665031,0.00001214556,0.0054175854,0.00033347568,0.000046098223,0.000031164083,0.02019817,0.003411918,0.00041213716,0.39413702,0.5758395,0.0001340676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2543741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2543741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40230373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86482036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W106247267","doi":"","title":"An Economic Assessment of Same-Sex Marriage Laws","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard journal of law & public policy/Harvard journal of law and public policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Sanctions; Institution; Family law; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Lesbian; Law; Law and economics; Social psychology; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.024278939390909367,"score_gpt":0.331284516279577,"score_spread":0.30700557688866764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W106247267","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19467181,0.0073541068,0.053516615,0.012881049,0.0005590168,0.00039341045,0.0005953865,0.00005756428,0.72997105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724639,0.0030761075,0.0044106906,0.00078872585,0.00041759977,0.00017042074,0.00019579481,0.000026552332,0.018450169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963517,0.0012773895,0.00010380572,0.00018742695,0.0016298998,0.00044975194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890326,0.007785447,0.0010388856,0.0005250608,0.0011161735,0.0005018297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005320034,0.00047400792,0.00069745525,0.0033560488,0.0018148732,0.0056888866,0.0015305249,0.002303242,0.01312633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021247456,0.0003248447,0.0011033762,0.0020259656,0.004236863,0.0052921567,0.002232963,0.002898295,0.00041651196],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029953793,0.00006733475,0.0025681495,0.000034550467,0.000014164751,0.00008891977,0.0000728497,0.0067031477,0.00003848451,0.9800047,0.0017705865,0.008607213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037385966,0.00015547624,0.007718151,0.00024430917,0.000046334128,0.00028368508,0.0010942825,0.06311526,0.00020685288,0.88925534,0.037793607,0.00004923506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042266417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029650133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01312633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044045667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024206939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043911994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W113836864","doi":"","title":"The Evolution of Same Sex Marriage Law in Canada: Lessons for the U.S","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Journal of Gender & Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sex discrimination; Law reform; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.028914507932121965,"score_gpt":0.28810532761018554,"score_spread":0.25919081967806357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W113836864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8076296,0.00326788,0.0009016488,0.060332913,0.00015864712,0.00006439812,0.0010899219,0.00004408191,0.12651089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871001,0.0011520701,0.00029275072,0.0016585395,0.000015134319,0.00000584157,0.0001314369,0.000020240332,0.009623712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980757,0.00020849267,0.00003448428,0.00021899953,0.00052900106,0.0009333279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99479693,0.0005255633,0.00028396636,0.000119989665,0.0028298125,0.001443713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016133538,0.00013501209,0.0003784663,0.0023709666,0.010948961,0.0050767437,0.0015300084,0.0018034893,0.01246437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067436737,0.00024717159,0.00032392962,0.0033726355,0.006637399,0.0013505484,0.0015699526,0.0024454703,0.00041124353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024360968,0.00024894235,0.26452708,0.00010496074,0.00010411294,0.0010988462,0.04151842,0.003592628,0.0019525693,0.45753056,0.058132585,0.17094564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006585359,0.000077724835,0.7060547,0.0003991762,0.000073967494,0.0003785162,0.061761536,0.004350281,0.0008275431,0.021989176,0.20386924,0.0001523919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99469453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096689664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.096689664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13297985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70153594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W114757845","doi":"10.29173/alr121","title":"The Changing Regulatory Scheme in Northeast British Columbia","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Negotiation; Hydraulic fracturing; Government (linguistics); Boom; Environmental law; Business; Redress; Petroleum industry; Jurisprudence; Natural resource; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.023721149658074637,"score_gpt":0.26155335985384837,"score_spread":0.23783221019577372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W114757845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21501422,0.016920147,0.0026921902,0.12967172,0.0027190454,0.0006646439,0.0022904181,0.00040739714,0.62962013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52480084,0.009379835,0.0049401987,0.08098874,0.00022539767,0.0003414587,0.0012671421,0.00014870013,0.37790763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919762,0.00055852457,0.00034920417,0.0010681282,0.003916065,0.0021318605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857486,0.002522136,0.00044105327,0.00048292047,0.0085083535,0.0022969719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004164025,0.00028711566,0.00041464544,0.0027284033,0.014564397,0.010806484,0.0035504657,0.0058601554,0.0080817295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01014593,0.0007368203,0.00040094234,0.00369776,0.0052772323,0.001314806,0.0020369804,0.0057651424,0.00072807155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001380112,0.00022566157,0.029034855,0.00058302935,0.00007193683,0.0044334764,0.008910933,0.0038279325,0.006388585,0.48059583,0.336843,0.12894665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056088265,0.000058341822,0.04812088,0.000723275,0.000058589543,0.00043186045,0.005786139,0.0014991965,0.000836874,0.005311947,0.936848,0.00026876474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9927745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.851285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.148715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22852953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98736995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W11616365","doi":"10.21991/c9s084","title":"FURTHER RESTRICTINGS ON ACCESS TO CHARTER REVIEW: A COMMENT ON HY AND ZEL'S INC. V. ONTARIO (A.G.)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.06074538259970911,"score_gpt":0.3081228134511146,"score_spread":0.24737743085140548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W11616365","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026458192,0.0021477253,0.00048748622,0.9307398,0.0051392606,0.0001843921,0.002017353,0.00022792043,0.056410268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012346883,0.0009773342,0.00061203627,0.9485889,0.0025515296,0.0002253634,0.00026497408,0.000057721234,0.034375254],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9751058,0.0018331148,0.0022378087,0.0024238504,0.011869146,0.0065304185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9583605,0.019146508,0.0025437165,0.0018792285,0.012993675,0.005076376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013525524,0.0014426393,0.0020623195,0.0019061265,0.017962692,0.008461543,0.010945812,0.13123886,0.01373949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04163212,0.0028505533,0.004052571,0.003294667,0.011351499,0.0046725967,0.0044103353,0.043927945,0.0060143075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005192207,0.000023787008,0.0009420267,0.00009425869,0.000020923126,0.00042161712,0.0013860121,0.0000859499,0.0005914968,0.017135141,0.9772086,0.0020381773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034581101,0.00005930709,0.013024146,0.00061736937,0.00016819875,0.00030582421,0.0017958027,0.00036561795,0.0007381995,0.0050801416,0.9772066,0.00029302033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88339627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9420842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13123886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048980642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.109591275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35538107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1193139268","doi":"","title":"Attorney-Client Privileged Documents: Federal District Court Limits the Scope of Attorney-Client Privilege Granted Involving In-House Counsel","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Law & Medicine","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; False Claims Act; Waiver; Statute; Government (linguistics); Political science; Legal advice; Medicaid; Plaintiff; Damages; Privilege (computing); Medicine; Health care","score_opus":0.018150789315568027,"score_gpt":0.299806196081922,"score_spread":0.281655406766354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1193139268","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12757659,0.0052606133,0.00996564,0.053562265,0.0014930486,0.0007860943,0.0017157521,0.00084371126,0.79879624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8382579,0.001447562,0.0030409745,0.056547906,0.0013578337,0.0005465058,0.0005868544,0.00017840772,0.0980361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97438806,0.0036875014,0.0019141948,0.003336954,0.008921324,0.007751924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96173966,0.023374306,0.0021574302,0.003396747,0.0068386444,0.0024931675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014434131,0.00079622446,0.0012348613,0.002321566,0.012876245,0.016819213,0.004155476,0.028706899,0.028023377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038874656,0.001714418,0.0009740675,0.0019436318,0.0046604243,0.0046237865,0.00657213,0.010013163,0.0072227693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062159594,0.0006743995,0.023338143,0.00032735284,0.00015688072,0.00427558,0.0040139775,0.0016159639,0.0059245513,0.54911476,0.34326816,0.06666868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001017274,0.0007645415,0.049740717,0.0023393575,0.0007498022,0.0051898663,0.003643556,0.009011538,0.014740241,0.10697762,0.80516726,0.00065825874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08118049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14128235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08118049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010620542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028888365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16141593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1195034990","doi":"","title":"Civil Procedure - Second Circuit Upholds Extraterritorial Reach over Foreign Financial Institution under the Anti-Terrorism Act","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Plaintiff; Terrorism; Damages; Political science; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Personal jurisdiction; Constitution; State (computer science); Sociology","score_opus":0.023192761975116487,"score_gpt":0.2854697569323346,"score_spread":0.2622769949572181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1195034990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015508502,0.0013414816,0.0021783868,0.024411587,0.0012736546,0.0006772368,0.002854201,0.0004619537,0.951293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23307152,0.0014169279,0.0021351415,0.11364783,0.0013181525,0.00097513216,0.0018931607,0.0001558724,0.64538634],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865485,0.0011316276,0.0003851992,0.001280977,0.0056723417,0.0049813767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99341077,0.0021527912,0.00028221795,0.000645435,0.0028810645,0.0006277895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043052686,0.0013202991,0.0008055691,0.0018490797,0.009468466,0.009157223,0.0028809402,0.020807322,0.03498718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012285681,0.0012820093,0.0017343328,0.0015455282,0.0037082762,0.002331453,0.0027376048,0.01094465,0.012823549],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019858488,0.0002366414,0.0031432696,0.00012063394,0.00004908758,0.0021527004,0.0014363625,0.00068943814,0.0026316317,0.31897828,0.64901495,0.021348441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033814498,0.00023527235,0.011350294,0.00044966795,0.00009173392,0.00090925,0.0011644267,0.0013982278,0.0031778857,0.01588771,0.9647727,0.00022466744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38750172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5517626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38750172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017248096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034777194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77049243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W121911457","doi":"","title":"Legal Issues Arising From the Health Care Reform Issue","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; Politics; Health care; State (computer science); Employee Retirement Income Security Act; Political science; Liability insurance; Health care reform; Law; Law and economics; Insurance policy; Economics; Health policy; Pension","score_opus":0.04157606531804298,"score_gpt":0.3365920831101973,"score_spread":0.2950160177921543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W121911457","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016033093,0.0062564784,0.0058661927,0.81620187,0.0029739605,0.00008194556,0.000107743865,0.00003351417,0.15244526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5060001,0.0065303287,0.0064791692,0.42855218,0.018082917,0.00021388712,0.00012343212,0.00007727066,0.03394069],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9629532,0.010798116,0.0017283511,0.0035343147,0.013311621,0.007674422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9583978,0.03131613,0.0018695522,0.0012312719,0.00518755,0.0019976427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03484717,0.00043318383,0.0009795075,0.0025879915,0.021890158,0.016850237,0.004754972,0.033417113,0.006788061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05477996,0.00095821416,0.0017302643,0.002245908,0.03717416,0.0111380145,0.006544444,0.027651452,0.00070044806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056764297,0.000020042104,0.00026822535,0.000021519823,0.0000051937463,0.00024138385,0.001356592,0.00014649509,0.000074847216,0.98010606,0.014063491,0.0036903825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009658331,0.000054753902,0.0028550986,0.00054515665,0.00007382172,0.00061122084,0.005545615,0.0011543818,0.0005466109,0.58874905,0.39961347,0.0001542342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1349473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.157378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1349473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030977512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046155788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26832366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1235290971","doi":"","title":"The Loadstone Rock: The Role of Harm in the Criminalization of Plural Unions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Harm; Law; Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Sociology; Mores; Criminology; History; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.028028749304842775,"score_gpt":0.2986093494421076,"score_spread":0.2705806001372648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1235290971","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11536764,0.0127833495,0.033161808,0.20645629,0.0011100532,0.00007948857,0.000037035097,0.000075676704,0.6309287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.968734,0.0011960402,0.0016993047,0.011648161,0.00050496194,0.000057674315,0.0000076157503,0.000028345157,0.016123861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9719425,0.01869573,0.00044316927,0.0015445516,0.0048991186,0.0024749606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98015434,0.015195229,0.0014329343,0.0013655903,0.0011561244,0.0006956677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014335002,0.0004393135,0.00064976356,0.002563736,0.01621471,0.011131792,0.0023273572,0.011025258,0.0032486366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02540505,0.00042983878,0.0007090657,0.0011732252,0.104792,0.01120172,0.013106856,0.009886453,0.00036680332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007862219,0.000005277623,0.00027317562,0.000014223311,0.000002375995,0.000112916445,0.006278005,0.00013450619,0.000023556071,0.98907673,0.0014017324,0.0026696029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014571309,0.000043259213,0.0012950985,0.00024042239,0.0000099268345,0.00029800108,0.012422433,0.00089438574,0.00026090036,0.8904492,0.09403037,0.000041307096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014975709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011502042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01621471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008338561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005238931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075811684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1238124","doi":"10.29173/alr275","title":"Canada (A.G.) v. PHS Community Services Society — The Insite Decision","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Lease; Forbearance; Public administration","score_opus":0.021542994379209802,"score_gpt":0.29997823915292093,"score_spread":0.2784352447737111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1238124","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034075066,0.012189473,0.0009903726,0.24456723,0.0026556815,0.0004485345,0.0032115304,0.000294201,0.7015679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21150014,0.0052508996,0.001859275,0.2501653,0.00046936993,0.00019876951,0.0008887649,0.000092072085,0.5295754],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956145,0.00025810066,0.000073674026,0.00027471944,0.0019627314,0.00181617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966053,0.00067665137,0.00006712121,0.00007304166,0.0016832289,0.00089462264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024698596,0.00040681695,0.00037353914,0.001365567,0.025738688,0.0063180486,0.0023332883,0.011657333,0.012241044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005368149,0.00083612656,0.0006237639,0.0018878012,0.0037592207,0.0010502747,0.001349018,0.006833987,0.0016267069],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004921404,0.000049638074,0.003106418,0.000102181875,0.000023829103,0.00090178644,0.0016403663,0.00028799102,0.0005375159,0.16533782,0.81146747,0.016495777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008902732,0.00003553946,0.013302601,0.00026393528,0.000068740555,0.00022849516,0.0027849087,0.00044464954,0.00070558145,0.008482051,0.9734876,0.00010685684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99170226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99786335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9387931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06120687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22398803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.444089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W133852656","doi":"","title":"Judicial Selection and Democratic Theory: Demand, Supply, and Life Tenure","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Adjudication; Political science; Separation of powers; Law; Judicial review; Judicial independence; Constitution; Judicial activism; Accountability; Legitimacy; Rule of law; Supreme court; Politics","score_opus":0.00943560439557363,"score_gpt":0.26658545450579074,"score_spread":0.2571498501102171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W133852656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11492482,0.005400172,0.02539828,0.09719058,0.00044354273,0.00007854095,0.0002718033,0.000058653823,0.7562336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808264,0.0010034163,0.0012542566,0.0026864375,0.0010041122,0.00006335347,0.000055097596,0.000037571757,0.013069323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852888,0.00769999,0.0004331032,0.0015217089,0.0031494661,0.0019069613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95080775,0.034567032,0.0047950866,0.0028370917,0.0035363308,0.0034566675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014527064,0.00022851976,0.00064103934,0.0025099088,0.0070548407,0.0099650975,0.0014316835,0.0032287962,0.016472261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034159616,0.00034012424,0.00039156724,0.0032037988,0.024895867,0.00794862,0.0041675186,0.004187987,0.0013374379],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016089829,0.000038098664,0.0018837907,0.000019524847,0.0000028341549,0.000019938632,0.0015343457,0.00025698004,0.00003092609,0.9858191,0.0027716246,0.0076066023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042199983,0.00003057958,0.0026908237,0.000076720244,0.000004559972,0.000041387233,0.0014459859,0.0009918406,0.00008365843,0.962889,0.031689774,0.000013477522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034454702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005138024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016472261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072349617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004229848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07682741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W139234383","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.436480","title":"The Paradox of the Misuse of Administrative Law in ERISA Benefit Claims","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Golder Associates (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Administrative law; Business; Political science; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.022729955400126303,"score_gpt":0.3184111754368146,"score_spread":0.2956812200366883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W139234383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22563069,0.0044793067,0.03052301,0.3277503,0.0006563747,0.00007510406,0.00030542168,0.0002661756,0.4103137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98363346,0.00051741354,0.0013245526,0.009127889,0.0008610891,0.000044131022,0.000027785956,0.00007555772,0.0043880376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96035856,0.017978562,0.0022950303,0.0046550175,0.010741953,0.003970804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7288937,0.21834078,0.016849687,0.020234194,0.012254048,0.003427586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.063347824,0.00037019685,0.002237706,0.003738145,0.008526753,0.021860188,0.004024226,0.024544757,0.012061334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20272782,0.001148679,0.0012932466,0.0048830993,0.029733079,0.02913998,0.007980159,0.022751309,0.0022141037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007150667,0.000040148774,0.0008677868,0.000037482314,0.000016341675,0.00014631751,0.0021436932,0.00028381898,0.00014338351,0.9858395,0.0049213264,0.0054885377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007774947,0.000020249732,0.0019519792,0.00008436431,0.00002788864,0.00014762618,0.0015339813,0.0015133552,0.00026889791,0.98108417,0.0132558495,0.00003385456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058218143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004731581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063347824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059994054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062264362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33501935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W145174559","doi":"","title":"Alberta's New Lobbyist and Conflict of Interest Legislation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12623933283566602,"score_gpt":0.3175506723979309,"score_spread":0.19131133956226487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W145174559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02077277,0.035169892,0.0026315276,0.27862772,0.016501125,0.0005835474,0.0036786066,0.0005342445,0.64150053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16374798,0.014528852,0.00855002,0.07542629,0.0025320263,0.00025258254,0.0018506936,0.0002315264,0.73288006],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97061443,0.0015619892,0.00091885176,0.0013082422,0.022065843,0.0035306155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9653764,0.0061015924,0.00079680653,0.0011989452,0.022417089,0.004109136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014597119,0.0006247194,0.00076420314,0.0072718663,0.013182677,0.0150978565,0.003402821,0.008694095,0.010407553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031185217,0.00090852176,0.00097649544,0.0043457747,0.00443338,0.001999141,0.0020957175,0.0063317833,0.001034175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004615029,0.00003199177,0.0023592482,0.00021319886,0.000035208333,0.00026306615,0.00092969433,0.0004380407,0.00031452155,0.123116195,0.8362129,0.036039922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023386341,0.000012358561,0.011791302,0.00021214427,0.00006528215,0.000063203726,0.00046818092,0.0002512574,0.00030811515,0.003917549,0.9828279,0.000059327827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9805291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10419984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10419984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30950242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75602627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480252542","doi":"","title":"Privacy & Terrorism Review - Where Have We Come in 10 Years?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Patriot Act; Political science; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Law; Presidential system; National security; Business; Population; Privacy laws of the United States; Information privacy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02017663765758389,"score_gpt":0.3186287148046143,"score_spread":0.2984520771470304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480252542","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000036405872,0.9915047,0.000029743234,0.0063152052,0.0012854538,0.0000062472336,0.000024306113,0.000002864314,0.0007950291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00041291656,0.9947168,0.00004732058,0.0034995885,0.00094056077,0.00000845305,0.0000395763,0.000001957347,0.00033281406],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718386,0.0010491832,0.0004686777,0.00021846626,0.00088920444,0.00019056619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98164684,0.010321241,0.0020303223,0.00033518628,0.004800292,0.00086612545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047059194,0.0006968244,0.0019148289,0.005302896,0.0011227694,0.0034596338,0.0017490351,0.004215976,0.009389818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016503392,0.00056684547,0.0015072341,0.0059041437,0.00205839,0.005200226,0.0015851944,0.0048683574,0.0027408244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075141834,0.00005019536,0.0004246844,0.05841972,0.00024730974,0.00022519463,0.00026710663,0.00017237841,0.00013541133,0.011493889,0.36478525,0.5637039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012550769,0.000053381606,0.001015053,0.06912605,0.00018078236,0.000561764,0.00022495873,0.000021776306,0.000036848778,0.0017873045,0.9269635,0.000015985734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076932297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019242523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009389818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038802756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01117568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031412065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482536848","doi":"","title":"A Tale of Three Signatories: Learning from the European Union, Japanese, and Canadian Kyoto Experiences in Crafting a Superior United States Climate Change Regime","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kyoto Protocol; Greenhouse gas; European union; Climate change; Emissions trading; Climate change mitigation; Renewable energy; Political science; International trade; Business; Economy; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.016727232846526285,"score_gpt":0.2476527710087194,"score_spread":0.23092553816219313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482536848","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34760746,0.009278274,0.0034025765,0.35826716,0.0042139003,0.000087906,0.00009333125,0.00013810457,0.27691114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91833174,0.004740188,0.0016928558,0.02527921,0.00018555531,0.000039067778,0.00007912452,0.00013580217,0.049516425],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879524,0.0042381743,0.00025469263,0.00065415056,0.0027640623,0.0041365395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867649,0.0028409366,0.0004685838,0.00049241615,0.004744045,0.004689133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015760778,0.0006168169,0.00056685193,0.0012028717,0.05947115,0.018327171,0.0014705284,0.005170043,0.0038249453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017056571,0.00036209438,0.00048309236,0.002066243,0.02685967,0.007504548,0.008336058,0.011189712,0.0005226092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011580801,0.00008497433,0.0065483847,0.00015193407,0.000024933992,0.0013345677,0.6934868,0.00034037416,0.0010806437,0.1428905,0.10266581,0.051275216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012680832,0.00004024188,0.003838086,0.00023273927,0.000026775571,0.0001602218,0.6234551,0.00015828435,0.00038234104,0.0056772255,0.36589253,0.00012370394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81318337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88666356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95716023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042839747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08414493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37583363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483029253","doi":"","title":"Why the Development of Mass Torts in Canada Is Important to Corporate America: Not Only Are American Manufacturers Liable to Suit in Canada, but That Nation's Class Action Regime Is Developing the Potential for Increased Exposure","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Class action; Punitive damages; Law; Jury; Supreme court; Product liability; Political science; Business; Liability; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.033356526601454266,"score_gpt":0.25253559787557256,"score_spread":0.2191790712741183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483029253","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054602623,0.011840946,0.0031362914,0.6226706,0.0021395055,0.00007720697,0.00038768788,0.00020998069,0.30493516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7599864,0.010528733,0.0026738623,0.15315586,0.00081105024,0.000033807653,0.0002534832,0.00018829868,0.07236852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918001,0.0005629383,0.0001179166,0.0006553881,0.003876965,0.002986749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9822389,0.0017918996,0.0010373316,0.000442272,0.009677411,0.00481222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037148567,0.0004003751,0.00039272386,0.0015823104,0.025108492,0.013922737,0.0019226768,0.0060955565,0.013965589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018623844,0.00047531346,0.0006267118,0.0021550981,0.016322548,0.00575188,0.0025595704,0.007934863,0.00138674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008067056,0.00007310336,0.03733744,0.00021634107,0.00006863287,0.001280986,0.007742062,0.0005650995,0.0011312923,0.52873325,0.36253724,0.06023396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005814828,0.000051846444,0.076920725,0.00093244296,0.00013235514,0.0010767219,0.020864088,0.0012406794,0.0015782941,0.05601448,0.8408836,0.00024660648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.988035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99457896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10416142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10416142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16910361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75574756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483767843","doi":"","title":"Psychological Consequences of Adopting a Therapeutic Lawyering Approach: Pitfalls and Protective Strategies","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Therapeutic jurisprudence; Countertransference; Neutrality; Process (computing); Psychology; Psychotherapist; Burnout; Therapeutic relationship; Jurisprudence; Engineering ethics; Law; Mental health; Clinical psychology; Political science; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.051051897712148846,"score_gpt":0.3095755052090106,"score_spread":0.25852360749686176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483767843","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27184924,0.0074655027,0.041221272,0.5894289,0.0013434914,0.0004605185,0.000023698216,0.00035845334,0.08784893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97286284,0.0015333014,0.010809972,0.012393043,0.00025671758,0.00025003235,0.000005539597,0.00002703457,0.0018614668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95372885,0.03445717,0.0012567991,0.0013384243,0.0066599026,0.002558882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9657479,0.020413911,0.0040386445,0.0026795529,0.0029250002,0.0041949647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030326845,0.00064235175,0.0004683091,0.0017513786,0.012395249,0.0075444523,0.0025841123,0.008401644,0.00206804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060378637,0.0005625906,0.00056804885,0.0007573044,0.037055265,0.006138505,0.0099043595,0.0099693565,0.00043689876],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097329925,0.0012308614,0.018374758,0.0005560125,0.00009155044,0.0041212677,0.2375237,0.0008235549,0.0021845696,0.5323352,0.01392733,0.18873394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024421146,0.00053141225,0.015172419,0.001815061,0.000099372846,0.010249126,0.34513062,0.0037597478,0.0018690311,0.5430891,0.07786938,0.00017060207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002726568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004649985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030326845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032231507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010321111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16038561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483904195","doi":"","title":"Using the Charter to Cure Health Care: Panacea or Placebo?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Panacea (medicine); Charter; Politics; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Health care; Public health care; Medicine; Public administration; Sociology; Alternative medicine; Health policy","score_opus":0.03267490134069296,"score_gpt":0.3521586041574903,"score_spread":0.31948370281679733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483904195","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059465882,0.015425922,0.019343793,0.8523792,0.008927703,0.00009278713,0.00004505966,0.00012826514,0.0977107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58041966,0.01382242,0.013906782,0.34653515,0.015789304,0.000503439,0.00004794399,0.00015089852,0.028824473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9631067,0.023181876,0.0011423181,0.0023861327,0.007894991,0.002287919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9496702,0.040084753,0.003509558,0.0032202995,0.0025197237,0.0009953572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05271569,0.00082966546,0.0015189543,0.0021378186,0.0061575947,0.012193323,0.002942088,0.022433145,0.004976727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11135501,0.00044142207,0.0009805312,0.0016792462,0.059760872,0.017628923,0.0061298828,0.02667618,0.00081736484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000102899585,0.000011652758,0.00005475382,0.000025237307,0.0000044005974,0.00002172202,0.00037379033,0.000086358305,0.000025945075,0.9888707,0.0074383314,0.0030768095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010649964,0.00010196282,0.00025061847,0.0004094753,0.000024648967,0.00008700342,0.0011352715,0.00077623804,0.00024745928,0.8531437,0.14366104,0.000056107765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051798257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056654685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05271569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006675976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015360926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27879053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486541666","doi":"","title":"The Constitution of Agreement: A Brief Look at Sub-Federal Cross-Border Cooperation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Agreement; Political science; Covenant; Law; Scope (computer science); State (computer science); Public administration","score_opus":0.0061881381555569616,"score_gpt":0.31234230124391493,"score_spread":0.30615416308835797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486541666","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04371009,0.028284973,0.02650619,0.08299517,0.0012576488,0.00013683015,0.00013922913,0.000056763678,0.8169132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93229544,0.012483702,0.007523486,0.01269302,0.0009534092,0.00040311215,0.00009200857,0.00004735627,0.03350846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910676,0.004929533,0.000383002,0.00079864915,0.0014794129,0.0013417756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956269,0.0033393556,0.000275556,0.00039312098,0.00024009722,0.0001249184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007736153,0.0002794674,0.00062372466,0.0021101085,0.011416816,0.012997929,0.0013029781,0.008469672,0.0034632573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008282182,0.0004573292,0.0006375041,0.0033188425,0.02382704,0.012363122,0.0044383495,0.008893764,0.00051809056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.499817e-7,0.000002134501,0.000027148502,0.0000059063077,3.8778995e-7,0.000022096554,0.001042177,0.000032357984,0.000013944152,0.99768925,0.00047127876,0.0006923139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009583061,0.000022434182,0.0006765498,0.00032987673,0.0000057667253,0.00015815225,0.004498508,0.00050969474,0.00018975754,0.80711603,0.186461,0.000022643195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0110231675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009562718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012997929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008939442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064636003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06486052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489925341","doi":"","title":"Getting Sex \"Right\": Heteronormativity and Biologism in Trans and Intersex Marriage Litigation and Scholarship","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of gender law & policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Heteronormativity; Law; Transgender; Scholarship; Sociology; Bodily integrity; Political science; Normative; Adjudication; Gender studies; Human sexuality","score_opus":0.026883449821106402,"score_gpt":0.32428863116215334,"score_spread":0.29740518134104693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489925341","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25628236,0.011291416,0.015611643,0.18042669,0.0013693261,0.000054370077,0.00002815235,0.000054328662,0.5348817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806176,0.0009184963,0.0008684247,0.010704094,0.0003287974,0.0000487193,0.000007322619,0.000017051727,0.006489442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826841,0.011941848,0.00053043047,0.0014426126,0.0023785874,0.0010223398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97826266,0.017399685,0.0012156267,0.0012612076,0.0010558772,0.00080492435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022511806,0.00021701884,0.00056607096,0.0019771266,0.012874736,0.015824718,0.0015860475,0.007273984,0.0034839509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01934646,0.00024975967,0.00036335082,0.0010450643,0.10441753,0.010487299,0.01240274,0.007817109,0.00025835447],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073534493,0.000017302285,0.00039864006,0.000017618991,0.0000020297398,0.00012399424,0.04542044,0.000045341607,0.00010111008,0.94962054,0.0009500824,0.0032955278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017134458,0.00005111771,0.0013367059,0.000423357,0.000011229413,0.00030167663,0.12156329,0.00053981977,0.00064560724,0.7918536,0.083226934,0.000029501323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040348573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041314284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022511806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004794241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004764346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11905527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492945492","doi":"","title":"Auspicium Melioris Aevi: A Token Of A Better Age","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Library science; Law; Editorial board; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.03639924132225035,"score_gpt":0.3298574677081266,"score_spread":0.2934582263858762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492945492","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009764221,0.038418725,0.0009735192,0.42029864,0.48437166,0.000036400368,0.00011416538,0.00038970917,0.054420684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025022881,0.02528411,0.0019373944,0.14748622,0.38070104,0.00011264729,0.0002398579,0.00088005664,0.4183358],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99619627,0.00077831384,0.00018303779,0.00052284397,0.0018933933,0.00042614702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910068,0.0017983032,0.0007330065,0.00059654255,0.0033311332,0.0025342503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004405911,0.0009922727,0.00071104936,0.0018767035,0.0033716434,0.009495741,0.0014649455,0.0034534743,0.022918792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013664532,0.00035925,0.00034611384,0.0010063449,0.0027909877,0.004329689,0.003489292,0.0070558167,0.012726806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007978787,0.00000663468,0.000077337885,0.000047424215,0.0000014617692,0.00003321376,0.00013716295,0.0000071118925,0.000093673574,0.0036274372,0.9866795,0.009280962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015643292,0.0000037899777,0.00014979884,0.00006341177,0.0000011588867,0.00003869152,0.00014202757,0.00002519754,0.00005758316,0.00061554054,0.99889827,0.0000029116186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022458953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004001574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022918792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002535068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044962685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076671004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493551315","doi":"10.21991/c9pt0f","title":"Case Comment: Canada (Attorney General) v PHS Community Services Society","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Discretion; Jurisprudence; Political science; Legal guardian; Constitutional court; Public administration; Constitution","score_opus":0.04371893510183338,"score_gpt":0.26364144151413,"score_spread":0.2199225064122966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493551315","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020414174,0.003788878,0.0009766703,0.6999283,0.0036780601,0.00027540184,0.0011229196,0.000119076205,0.26969662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13331923,0.001886728,0.0006595887,0.7342112,0.0014507126,0.00014876958,0.0003164056,0.0000711672,0.12793626],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99299145,0.00056961353,0.00016243524,0.0008288761,0.0026936592,0.0027539656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969037,0.0015051997,0.000119510965,0.000077590965,0.0010311824,0.00036276283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028380125,0.0006901576,0.00068925676,0.001519616,0.025717655,0.0070855413,0.0041459915,0.03474118,0.013218716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009727874,0.00083591265,0.001225603,0.002954354,0.006681468,0.0024368938,0.0020097224,0.022660878,0.001829166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072727504,0.000056165172,0.0022143493,0.00007721025,0.000025584302,0.0033343874,0.004572781,0.00034640013,0.0004705108,0.21934137,0.764557,0.004931426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013195808,0.00004780499,0.005924284,0.00037142067,0.00011395345,0.0013069845,0.010915776,0.0010263902,0.0012111781,0.026327074,0.9524039,0.00021931216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9149827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9472689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08501732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047256913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06291811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34287453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494529202","doi":"","title":"In Search of Prophylactic Rules","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legislature; Constitution; Law; Political science; Repeal; Constitutional review; Constitutionality; Constitutional right; Judicial review; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.02812784305623991,"score_gpt":0.3322232253782323,"score_spread":0.3040953823219924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1494529202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020799782,0.0050511826,0.09760245,0.118138775,0.0026022107,0.00030401014,0.0003056229,0.00036410659,0.7548319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7374334,0.0038261402,0.050261907,0.07786954,0.0023183574,0.00055315247,0.00046415947,0.0003458199,0.12692751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98227936,0.0048244023,0.0012895223,0.0034412423,0.0064940546,0.0016714224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722343,0.012289664,0.0023946457,0.0060546817,0.0057760514,0.0012506976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019802598,0.00042948904,0.0006689433,0.0020094612,0.0056090257,0.011108794,0.0023297875,0.0069540716,0.010969909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061199773,0.0006736189,0.0006911746,0.0012548473,0.015837876,0.011528682,0.0045943195,0.011874581,0.0032756063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048314805,0.0000060940943,0.00016367344,0.00001788916,0.0000029665791,0.000019435838,0.00035914822,0.00008852403,0.000082771505,0.98817134,0.006622289,0.0044610295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000256764,0.00002030663,0.000322652,0.00019684853,0.000018071376,0.00009715285,0.0004619844,0.00062095426,0.0008030003,0.7430139,0.2543983,0.000021194315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008071942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009552156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019802598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071325903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016711747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10472739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498795935","doi":"","title":"Torturous Consequences and the Case of Maher Arar: Can Canadian Solutions Cure the Due Process Deficiencies in U.S. Removal Proceedings","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Law and economics; Intensive care medicine; Medicine; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.01865442000027958,"score_gpt":0.2625715392883221,"score_spread":0.24391711928804252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1498795935","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12277577,0.005229883,0.0015362635,0.572689,0.0012546196,0.00013912008,0.00025298697,0.00008501167,0.29603738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8075489,0.0039838827,0.0018069199,0.12329762,0.00043288645,0.00006030118,0.00008209513,0.000053919048,0.06273337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923781,0.0009720821,0.00022791226,0.0004897651,0.0028163386,0.0031157383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99110186,0.0029284202,0.00064468087,0.00034208532,0.003405327,0.0015776225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00700234,0.00039121052,0.0004422655,0.001788621,0.029606014,0.006964409,0.0034627917,0.015829345,0.007983979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029419046,0.00036887612,0.00062703446,0.0020006276,0.008631361,0.0029024084,0.00354162,0.013410188,0.00049165083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111554335,0.00013421569,0.01182688,0.00016300104,0.00007001133,0.0059488923,0.027423266,0.0010984013,0.0011630548,0.66485214,0.23269054,0.054518044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019609086,0.00014732567,0.054983754,0.0012386234,0.0004179152,0.0043813162,0.06841953,0.003384211,0.0023635044,0.14199157,0.7219397,0.0005364306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9265648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9793276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07343519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04696542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12895124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34075958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499115456","doi":"10.21991/c9t66r","title":"SUPREME COURT OF CANADA IN BRYDGES EXANDS RIGHT TO COUNSEL","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Right to counsel; Remand (court procedure)","score_opus":0.023685569509992642,"score_gpt":0.25293871170625226,"score_spread":0.2292531421962596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499115456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06485009,0.008604106,0.0019894745,0.2660979,0.0055016642,0.0006647447,0.004045598,0.00027711038,0.6479693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3218463,0.0029156597,0.002794904,0.11123001,0.00079319585,0.00038927823,0.0008132413,0.000285548,0.5589318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97644114,0.001512893,0.0007210258,0.002254907,0.008250361,0.010819726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845918,0.0037516628,0.00033452702,0.0005645437,0.0070833494,0.0036741046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01006118,0.0010846474,0.0025216988,0.0027212002,0.05797685,0.024732849,0.006635359,0.031355113,0.020584377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027777784,0.0026428981,0.0018158038,0.0030370855,0.007976497,0.003343897,0.0055085793,0.032239877,0.0017612526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010138143,0.00007802164,0.0023103936,0.00006190518,0.00007088508,0.0009503223,0.0038227458,0.0004888361,0.0005088528,0.68872917,0.29483348,0.00804406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020989665,0.00003475638,0.013120624,0.00056097755,0.00019996987,0.0002188762,0.00593735,0.001520574,0.0012405623,0.044821035,0.9316801,0.00045528234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9929455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16245864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16245864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3629996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9714292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499637637","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.382680","title":"Cicio v. Does, 2003 U.S.App.LEXIS 2925 (2d Cir. 2/11/03) - Can We Extricate Ourselves from the Supreme Court's Quagmire of ERISA Remedies?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Golder Associates (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Lexis; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.01563317520167239,"score_gpt":0.27051862515370717,"score_spread":0.25488544995203477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499637637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056120283,0.0040651825,0.0010248381,0.05360525,0.0011342221,0.00014814758,0.0025219664,0.00026474494,0.9316237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.108756654,0.0036121022,0.0017144978,0.15413986,0.0007947094,0.00051992224,0.0017562159,0.00026484494,0.7284411],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966428,0.0001896707,0.0001359281,0.00040512037,0.0017103655,0.0009160647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957873,0.0015864463,0.00032486764,0.00028773004,0.0016519253,0.000361703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035051454,0.0008174022,0.0007450851,0.0020072889,0.012720085,0.010096599,0.002573283,0.015209354,0.05044397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015293531,0.001076931,0.00079912273,0.00200391,0.003155557,0.004781136,0.0027659736,0.009690476,0.019429756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005487182,0.00004770534,0.0015912628,0.0001582997,0.000012615908,0.00037205132,0.001490947,0.000069596725,0.00052193715,0.11759844,0.87033767,0.007744649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005552425,0.000025595396,0.0061859195,0.0003298702,0.00005495887,0.00026853013,0.0013063035,0.00021328998,0.0010234151,0.013733844,0.9767477,0.000055090582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19056183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45611045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19056183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008666427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014979197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3789053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501624571","doi":"","title":"\"Trapped\" in Sing Sing: Transgendered Prisoners Caught in the Gender Binarism","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Transgender; Lesbian; Sexual orientation; Gender identity; Criminology; Gender studies; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.05119094538386727,"score_gpt":0.3195292514121399,"score_spread":0.26833830602827263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501624571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92536247,0.0040936335,0.00084656663,0.03521324,0.0010113464,0.000066824396,0.000036497968,0.00006853355,0.033300973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98188895,0.0022087684,0.00030547977,0.0056668874,0.000191453,0.000056181692,0.000012381775,0.000024025621,0.009645793],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998744,0.0007022424,0.0000296059,0.000079388104,0.00009366229,0.000350994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992175,0.0002255545,0.00021287441,0.00003890791,0.000065282016,0.00023988844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010574849,0.0006463576,0.0004964903,0.0010634515,0.018437007,0.0058137276,0.00096300995,0.0044452827,0.0051015606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037526975,0.00039896162,0.0002965022,0.000592645,0.0098731825,0.0040126443,0.005790257,0.004215936,0.000618901],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006921654,0.00013175188,0.008785163,0.00012864057,0.000009576221,0.015019899,0.92503166,0.000035705714,0.001187419,0.020027013,0.01119631,0.01837766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004014823,0.00008468696,0.003189912,0.00014141595,0.000010361908,0.00703736,0.9722243,0.000047334946,0.00018444365,0.0022690732,0.014786475,0.000020620482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009768347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032266103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018437007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018174993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019143432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019422948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505095038","doi":"","title":"Section 6 of the Indian Act and \"The Second Generation Cut-off Rule\"-–A Factum","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Treaty; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Genealogy; History; Politics","score_opus":0.029928511596743534,"score_gpt":0.30122784997285057,"score_spread":0.27129933837610704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1505095038","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029364012,0.13205579,0.004116934,0.16418083,0.012228245,0.0001930828,0.000763433,0.00010107976,0.6834243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14088249,0.16554065,0.009358619,0.38201565,0.024108311,0.00085935515,0.001484204,0.00022154406,0.2755292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99229854,0.0017105879,0.00045470195,0.0005751031,0.0040537273,0.0009073767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955329,0.0023691095,0.00042271923,0.00023457808,0.0012432078,0.00019745094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065459874,0.0005391594,0.00049391866,0.0023413405,0.004338994,0.006885114,0.0026180246,0.0098689785,0.005540984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009263352,0.00051002356,0.0008683392,0.0024155108,0.008167702,0.0033329814,0.0014727778,0.011477823,0.0030578673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007357719,0.000027791853,0.00035972105,0.0001910169,0.0000038671055,0.00014783026,0.0007338865,0.00016444872,0.0001015235,0.73164415,0.25182223,0.014796145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036293002,0.000014698695,0.0010172075,0.00094890693,0.000008479292,0.00014571873,0.00028641324,0.00008143316,0.000117601056,0.027157547,0.9702002,0.000018197868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.081665024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06986475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91833496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060419613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014015819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16237938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509516451","doi":"","title":"Can You Patent That? A Review of Subject Matter Eligibility in Canada and the United States","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patentable subject matter; Subject matter; Subject (documents); Statute; Deference; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Law and economics; Patent law; Intellectual property; Sociology; Patentability; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.030890037414999873,"score_gpt":0.3121329932854517,"score_spread":0.28124295587045184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509516451","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002429335,0.9950937,0.000031072723,0.0022340994,0.00013794468,0.000006897279,0.000042630036,0.0000022704417,0.002208374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033918233,0.9949516,0.00009676103,0.0009728535,0.000110551795,0.000005564173,0.000041308136,0.0000021459653,0.00042742016],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955161,0.00051234773,0.0004266988,0.00028608926,0.0028965364,0.0003622154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97904176,0.0059260894,0.0014897661,0.00015738119,0.012476728,0.0009081684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0091582015,0.000745105,0.0020099403,0.019740634,0.0026610696,0.0041681994,0.0020487001,0.0019747165,0.0031493036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019851936,0.00051829655,0.0009864001,0.02896961,0.0038823094,0.002141612,0.0008616922,0.0021332165,0.0005441938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112821705,0.000049311235,0.0027408525,0.029213157,0.00021269922,0.0003358214,0.00083948934,0.00061776023,0.00041642107,0.023946432,0.1602164,0.78129876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018936236,0.00004012856,0.011954029,0.034845263,0.0003841162,0.0002070342,0.00046696473,0.00011944616,0.00019164797,0.0023110833,0.9494216,0.000039803825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8461115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90836537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15388852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044019625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.117154025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31938624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509727831","doi":"","title":"Strickland-Lite: Padilla's Two-Tiered Duty for Noncitizens","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Immigration; Conviction; Duty; Political science; Immigration law; Right to counsel; Criminal law; Deportation; Criminal Conviction; Defense attorney; Punishment (psychology); Quarter (Canadian coin); Criminology; Sociology; History; Psychology","score_opus":0.010829125588598328,"score_gpt":0.28721920061557615,"score_spread":0.2763900750269778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509727831","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079780474,0.005311841,0.015013338,0.36758906,0.0018381021,0.00027149083,0.00018788932,0.00034376554,0.5296641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7348385,0.0014636335,0.008994077,0.14513025,0.00044696216,0.00033100523,0.000061807696,0.000117325195,0.108616516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99161834,0.0026917355,0.00025913498,0.0019604457,0.0015753174,0.0018951354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947807,0.0031016252,0.0003869175,0.0006182204,0.00067116536,0.00044126555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008416116,0.0004881453,0.0006351767,0.0016772107,0.012777273,0.014562852,0.0023681915,0.014033859,0.0045509953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021597108,0.0007039789,0.0006541627,0.0010588418,0.018603563,0.008401259,0.00908843,0.01636137,0.00072894705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015442198,0.000013121431,0.00043796524,0.000022220676,0.000004521302,0.00019295765,0.0032036584,0.00008282914,0.00013138606,0.9669831,0.018257126,0.010655661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078169396,0.00010261199,0.0031009065,0.0005525289,0.000047543537,0.0008318769,0.005166381,0.001423849,0.0016680743,0.37733102,0.60947007,0.00022707376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06228777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08176027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06228777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008487823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020750301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.123850465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510251589","doi":"","title":"The Proper Remedy for a Lack of Batson Findings: The Fall-Out from Snyder v. Louisiana","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Merck Canada Inc. (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Denial; Law; Political science; Trial court; Psychology; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.0351712841029123,"score_gpt":0.312802299376727,"score_spread":0.2776310152738147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510251589","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12630954,0.00391793,0.018798614,0.6490934,0.0022195687,0.00014293342,0.00013606415,0.00021688524,0.19916503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76359355,0.0015069142,0.007884812,0.20742932,0.0010907454,0.00013490203,0.000059305436,0.00012637571,0.018174022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9705668,0.011533802,0.0018951021,0.0029337308,0.008589942,0.004480647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96433294,0.024130125,0.0020394977,0.0027724314,0.00506675,0.0016583111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04047589,0.00040965783,0.0009139164,0.0012495713,0.011155927,0.00735247,0.003074798,0.01794297,0.002443408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.071793616,0.00082166103,0.0008241126,0.0006662542,0.02082209,0.007553412,0.008896623,0.027258633,0.00068349356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007033548,0.000055607106,0.0039414293,0.00011145762,0.000045619396,0.0016476981,0.0068184948,0.00057811907,0.0011549713,0.90114254,0.06364243,0.020791264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018930127,0.0002215652,0.0043119234,0.00095537654,0.00015081033,0.001426751,0.011265712,0.0027867537,0.00445347,0.69748396,0.2765036,0.0002508369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03308603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07796297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04047589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076442207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031588033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21405953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1511188274","doi":"","title":"Insights From Canada for American Constitutional Federalism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Federalist; Supreme court; Political science; New Federalism; Commerce Clause; Law; Politics; Cooperative federalism; Legislature; Constitution; Constitutional law; Separation of powers; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.014173878747507666,"score_gpt":0.26610350562930557,"score_spread":0.25192962688179793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1511188274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016330933,0.016679272,0.0013988196,0.15029512,0.0008072911,0.0000345651,0.00040716867,0.00005093349,0.8139958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8523186,0.01916513,0.0032976384,0.04020901,0.0007309257,0.00009626602,0.00038090366,0.00010392225,0.08369758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99492055,0.0006996652,0.00009663739,0.00056590355,0.0017499522,0.001967196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961069,0.0011963813,0.00015856605,0.0001823492,0.0016602095,0.00069557136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002933377,0.00042986052,0.00059236033,0.0034111608,0.026213031,0.012922418,0.0014030747,0.0042004087,0.01555829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008026074,0.00030258743,0.000583092,0.005290548,0.017460652,0.004186285,0.0032806557,0.007429832,0.00075133285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064689066,0.000003707458,0.00041302727,0.000020344363,0.0000027201822,0.000058445243,0.002626546,0.00007895012,0.000025800422,0.97451085,0.018143797,0.004109338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020925014,0.0000068885743,0.003936562,0.00038568655,0.00003055045,0.00011009008,0.009439166,0.00035332568,0.00009105888,0.27012038,0.7154578,0.000047671205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9775519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98707527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18161774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18161774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15102583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9492074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1511321940","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3568756","title":"Intellectual Property Colloquium Series: Canada and the Three-Step Test: A Step in Which Direction?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Series (stratigraphy); Intellectual property; Test (biology); Property (philosophy); Computer science; Mathematics; Political science; Law; Geology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.011934034369658153,"score_gpt":0.22266337525591667,"score_spread":0.21072934088625853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1511321940","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016156465,0.023586497,0.0046386,0.69988436,0.05598221,0.00031436648,0.007068253,0.0003525593,0.19201669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3788479,0.02032645,0.012461873,0.15587315,0.013182235,0.00088602415,0.0072657894,0.0012537856,0.40990278],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99341875,0.0009261282,0.00028934111,0.0006627001,0.0033703528,0.00133276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9616515,0.011384351,0.0012201704,0.0023044532,0.018125666,0.0053139245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01132638,0.0008480816,0.0010474494,0.0027962641,0.009923892,0.009384626,0.005351593,0.008769218,0.03199379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04272451,0.00049183297,0.0008897608,0.0058646295,0.005973967,0.008763313,0.003464706,0.008463071,0.003119814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006547571,0.000050933246,0.0014158335,0.00007339733,0.000014484527,0.00006891024,0.00042401164,0.00016466434,0.00010108075,0.06956646,0.9052979,0.022756856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008549753,0.00006776821,0.013114185,0.00044276757,0.00005674712,0.00006388726,0.0036074691,0.001051796,0.0009509252,0.034841932,0.945575,0.00014198727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.870148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92077506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.129852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042169265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.107604906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3059609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515546384","doi":"","title":"The Commerce Clause – Commonwealth Comparisons","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College international and comparative law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Commonwealth; Commerce Clause; Law; Political science; Subject (documents); Power (physics); Dormant Commerce Clause; Federalism; Politics","score_opus":0.10675605986598544,"score_gpt":0.393803836988847,"score_spread":0.28704777712286156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515546384","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.068913,0.0026007514,0.0015005787,0.0031525597,0.00008910611,0.000020094001,0.0000454719,0.0000063371053,0.9236722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97418547,0.0010559757,0.0003325628,0.00088294456,0.000066432396,0.000021336795,0.000054602144,0.000016193339,0.02338445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99486166,0.0016571919,0.00015536945,0.0003730663,0.0018767219,0.0010760064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713045,0.0014424521,0.00024587405,0.00028268286,0.00070394564,0.00019473048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034426977,0.00019167789,0.00028230256,0.003674282,0.006111802,0.008252898,0.00067433604,0.0019869315,0.012929567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009411376,0.0001504361,0.00041374503,0.0040972354,0.009636018,0.004399242,0.0033938242,0.002237621,0.0006078314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074534137,0.000006929757,0.0005486434,0.0000062746503,0.0000040968157,0.000042598742,0.0017171658,0.000040246883,0.000060026956,0.99180704,0.001226831,0.004532628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002744685,0.0000793186,0.020776728,0.0002998494,0.000052624404,0.00014496404,0.010599405,0.0006746676,0.00095746596,0.8073453,0.15901174,0.00003052145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03170575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06052532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03170575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059138993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033923923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0630424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516652919","doi":"","title":"Allocating Damages Caused by Violation of the Charter: The Relevance of American Constitutional Remedies Jurisprudence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Damages; Jurisdiction; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Cause of action; Legislature; Constitution","score_opus":0.008418104755562386,"score_gpt":0.2788427618669082,"score_spread":0.27042465711134583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516652919","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06067618,0.032266907,0.018031431,0.30687585,0.0017311107,0.0000635685,0.00010237206,0.00012009783,0.5801325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92949873,0.011817406,0.0064416733,0.031021746,0.0012570666,0.00006193933,0.000029820996,0.00003297639,0.01983874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928108,0.0020807763,0.00029301574,0.0008235624,0.0030279693,0.00096384156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99056387,0.006503742,0.00037684682,0.00047032034,0.0016652102,0.00042000966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072044856,0.0003239679,0.0004813002,0.0019839676,0.008890591,0.012172561,0.0017626977,0.008867729,0.001936503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012167706,0.00034896104,0.00053274346,0.0017250247,0.042427983,0.0044432636,0.0027831725,0.010606166,0.00017924813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003855127,0.000008499551,0.00016060554,0.000009550397,0.0000019817126,0.000041255535,0.0005580745,0.00022038305,0.000055853507,0.99373674,0.0018462903,0.003356877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003164211,0.000031600404,0.0017243286,0.00033555168,0.000049845825,0.00011843481,0.0015547421,0.0018864265,0.0004731153,0.83138096,0.16234948,0.000063878055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28084525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32420272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28084525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027367234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032287385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55842113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518121802","doi":"","title":"\"Am I My Brother's Keeper?\"1: Reforming Criminal Hazing Laws Based on Assumption of Care","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Emory law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Merck Canada Inc. (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Statute; Political science; Liability; Duty; Enforcement; Law; Criminal law; Criminal liability; Brother; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.019549803617831468,"score_gpt":0.2976546569109547,"score_spread":0.27810485329312323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518121802","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051207654,0.0012349797,0.0066443644,0.7412926,0.0022923076,0.00010495074,0.00004829795,0.00010377315,0.19707109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.636427,0.0009999108,0.0030568964,0.28613782,0.0010800714,0.00012067624,0.000034699046,0.00007290723,0.07207004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916509,0.0038729045,0.00028612438,0.0010142835,0.0017036677,0.0014721128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911724,0.0053488445,0.0006499067,0.00045785925,0.0016467189,0.0007243325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012414936,0.00030855273,0.00027532008,0.00055591954,0.02309627,0.007541607,0.0028249423,0.016031487,0.0039227377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022721691,0.00036882726,0.00052350067,0.00037985994,0.019785551,0.0070689344,0.005655748,0.01942733,0.000959709],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001542105,0.000048264857,0.0019914897,0.000027969543,0.0000053490226,0.0004582584,0.035479825,0.0001364285,0.00028191536,0.82837933,0.1254825,0.007693141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007345478,0.00014775041,0.0075894617,0.0005799262,0.000056970133,0.0008394646,0.067706324,0.0031487863,0.0022392105,0.22683218,0.6906325,0.0001538807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07538698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11533607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07538698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007733397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017384224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14989632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518167023","doi":"","title":"Mr. Justice Marshall Rothstein, Supreme Court of Canada, Address to the American Bar Association, Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Association (psychology); Section (typography); Political science; Administrative law; Economic Justice; Bar (unit); Psychology; Business; Advertising; Geography","score_opus":0.06840600996292688,"score_gpt":0.35529124152952096,"score_spread":0.28688523156659407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518167023","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019366279,0.035125878,0.0006774509,0.8388024,0.014425408,0.00013558468,0.0012087879,0.00019179785,0.10749603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03300871,0.014683338,0.0012165203,0.4076201,0.0039280187,0.00013558553,0.0003914345,0.00016822637,0.5388481],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939903,0.0003261547,0.00016096859,0.0009874053,0.0027999706,0.0017352788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99551576,0.00072258,0.00012214936,0.00009652622,0.0026630214,0.00087997626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029340284,0.00086734485,0.00090583524,0.001514469,0.026944928,0.008699944,0.0028072551,0.015157204,0.021015821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010106145,0.0009616017,0.00084769214,0.0017662017,0.0041553974,0.0028649496,0.0014776974,0.018977568,0.0053558177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007953663,0.000009084053,0.00031440897,0.0000249293,0.000004869903,0.00011198256,0.00024211568,0.000052032097,0.00008722974,0.022882262,0.9702762,0.005986974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001017582,0.0000058617215,0.0014738813,0.00015247588,0.00001264826,0.00007017935,0.0004740177,0.00017690379,0.0001597647,0.003101182,0.9943223,0.000040678362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9371382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9758834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94018626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05981376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11828228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43398124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1525652459","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2571466","title":"Case Comment: Alberta v United Food and Commercial Workers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Agricultural economics; Environmental science; Economics","score_opus":0.014404261232963116,"score_gpt":0.2663090512859727,"score_spread":0.2519047900530096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1525652459","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04263508,0.0012739212,0.0007271069,0.7439493,0.0065832348,0.00012772513,0.00051600777,0.00020837148,0.20397918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10760041,0.00078632537,0.0004440104,0.7188533,0.002527951,0.00006040225,0.00014634985,0.00007017537,0.16951105],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99531317,0.0003334455,0.00013089481,0.000614178,0.0013224396,0.002285895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928076,0.0035962882,0.000305857,0.00030761975,0.001882648,0.0010999731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034864265,0.0008609963,0.0010103808,0.0014446581,0.025073271,0.009315754,0.00797735,0.090670824,0.02695562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013182411,0.0013486332,0.0011872579,0.0020175704,0.0070936303,0.0028062353,0.0031387662,0.034391183,0.004249283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000202484,0.00009887981,0.004794765,0.000082142105,0.0000675278,0.006336038,0.005097623,0.0004406741,0.0007576402,0.08504324,0.8908292,0.0062498106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002838518,0.00009290377,0.0121899685,0.0005148588,0.00036890854,0.0022743256,0.028084757,0.0015340627,0.001862287,0.027567556,0.92491835,0.00030816084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8330918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.916951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1669082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026006853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059019826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3357823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1525741930","doi":"","title":"In re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust Litigation: Examining the Requisite Levels of Inquiry into the Merits of a Case at the Class Certification Stage","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Class action; Class (philosophy); Political science; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Civil procedure; Summary judgment; Federal court; Law and economics; Economics; State (computer science); Computer science","score_opus":0.055958612772368785,"score_gpt":0.319606232146535,"score_spread":0.2636476193741662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1525741930","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22691539,0.0058727195,0.004072271,0.12080274,0.0014511137,0.0003878354,0.0006641092,0.00011496396,0.63971895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87839276,0.0021743546,0.0040694997,0.036658835,0.00050237833,0.000086503336,0.00016914192,0.000052269705,0.077894196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.985338,0.0010130606,0.000415413,0.0013360766,0.007654851,0.004242588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98501045,0.008236759,0.0007003876,0.0004957458,0.0048049306,0.0007516463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010262759,0.00046783368,0.000644199,0.0022773782,0.02186106,0.015309755,0.003812273,0.012341812,0.0039292043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03353695,0.0006844968,0.00095847435,0.0024075566,0.011683442,0.004266676,0.0029478695,0.0101576885,0.0005521259],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008635869,0.000052900275,0.005396224,0.00011225624,0.000027190454,0.0019064642,0.012001128,0.00064386876,0.0021473644,0.8998453,0.059432387,0.018348588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027418663,0.0001926806,0.05880493,0.00090601447,0.0004565478,0.0014729731,0.031369634,0.0048447847,0.012526564,0.14014992,0.74837506,0.0006268003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8903018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9617744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10969818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.068177715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.085758984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49466628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526362886","doi":"10.1177/009885881303900211","title":"The Role of Private Law in the Control of Risks Associated with Tobacco Smoking: The Canadian Experience","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Law & Medicine","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Legislation; Tobacco control; Government (linguistics); Class action; Business; Control (management); Political science; Law; Action (physics); Public administration; Public health; Medicine; State (computer science); Economics; Supreme court; Management","score_opus":0.01915490647097126,"score_gpt":0.299904142200474,"score_spread":0.2807492357295027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526362886","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19432715,0.022311857,0.0016837022,0.5478872,0.0013951004,0.00008608425,0.00037216867,0.0000506334,0.23188616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92493945,0.013072814,0.0007289288,0.038581945,0.00038816853,0.000023391569,0.00007667211,0.000055053897,0.022133615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98623925,0.0021971683,0.0003319364,0.0009898598,0.005436089,0.004805748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97972727,0.008358591,0.0010126143,0.00069897977,0.0052570254,0.0049455245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009538303,0.0004510876,0.00081479276,0.0017489375,0.054281432,0.012753188,0.002907447,0.009591452,0.0071350657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023551041,0.00061537477,0.00077049545,0.0038552298,0.0244607,0.0038011253,0.0050522885,0.013522057,0.00031068394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013018335,0.00017501853,0.01491025,0.00030536877,0.00006927172,0.00344159,0.15991157,0.00079314684,0.00094057596,0.64155763,0.1161688,0.061596688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096637305,0.000091691596,0.029539058,0.0008157655,0.00014562465,0.0014364128,0.13402873,0.0012856313,0.0007025986,0.03378603,0.79773295,0.00033884362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99446625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.185226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.185226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2904707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94502234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527157723","doi":"10.4225/75/57b289de40cd1","title":"Zubulake: The Catalyst for Change in eDiscovery","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Journal of Paramedicine","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Electronic data; Political science; Business; Electronic records; Law; Law and economics; Public relations; Economics; Civil procedure; Computer science","score_opus":0.04582346099285282,"score_gpt":0.3685235288390369,"score_spread":0.32270006784618405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1527157723","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2414331,0.00881908,0.021888599,0.5800454,0.003050964,0.00030361753,0.00009649759,0.00020363895,0.14415912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8673879,0.0029370238,0.009897965,0.08770563,0.00048573123,0.0001538371,0.00006696078,0.00009961098,0.031265236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96070486,0.012755534,0.0029586453,0.0044186767,0.0127992,0.0063631097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95209193,0.032134738,0.0035784247,0.00368516,0.00622525,0.0022845038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043038767,0.00030204214,0.00059639954,0.002182756,0.015363277,0.021850834,0.0039704423,0.0148005085,0.0025935967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11388071,0.0008385905,0.000684069,0.0023773715,0.016632633,0.018444555,0.011194208,0.018070402,0.00047285605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006573929,0.00007454681,0.0036815114,0.00008529636,0.000014134408,0.0024561593,0.010317535,0.0005153511,0.0009204587,0.92550033,0.022301007,0.03406792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011745543,0.00021962194,0.007015089,0.0010678647,0.000068335736,0.0030562524,0.026238536,0.0037631376,0.0063850274,0.25091803,0.7008196,0.000330987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03672208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03718545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043038767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020001914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02773452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22761351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542606338","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511617706","title":"Reconceiving the Family","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Child custody; Political science; Child support; Law; Work (physics); Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.025665456090244378,"score_gpt":0.22578862886568066,"score_spread":0.2001231727754363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542606338","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014086819,0.01304541,0.0131284,0.067455485,0.0014300453,0.000047786158,0.00007002106,0.000099644305,0.8906363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7184024,0.0086921295,0.006289545,0.01976748,0.0008612063,0.00015545587,0.000099639874,0.00018469874,0.24554746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99488443,0.003005531,0.0001027919,0.0005038718,0.0008598595,0.0006434224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855834,0.0005560848,0.00009292889,0.00031583753,0.0002519799,0.00022477802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004606967,0.00033105383,0.0003750024,0.0013303738,0.010392227,0.008602993,0.0015076968,0.004053146,0.010053868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0081297215,0.00021509171,0.00036084483,0.0010368924,0.022704909,0.0095985755,0.008865517,0.0044800043,0.001576191],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033076005,0.000004094606,0.000087818145,0.000009740362,0.0000012496088,0.00005994825,0.008212646,0.00006248453,0.000023210736,0.9620741,0.017024724,0.01243655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005152635,0.000011026127,0.00022690384,0.00021698217,0.0000046741065,0.00017425981,0.009502502,0.00018150645,0.00011892465,0.33036304,0.65918595,0.000009097549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012028326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015194912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012028326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007410811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010950742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05376941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1543897645","doi":"","title":"Deterring Player Holdouts: Who Should Do It, How to Do It, and Why It Has to be Done","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marquette sports law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advertising; Business","score_opus":0.07947803496910595,"score_gpt":0.3301894109656125,"score_spread":0.25071137599650656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1543897645","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044881683,0.047931384,0.0028128661,0.8402972,0.004669911,0.00016157221,0.00015986797,0.0002412986,0.058844265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61504054,0.061887532,0.0063597555,0.21437487,0.0030961616,0.00032128504,0.00042209294,0.00018050928,0.09831728],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955473,0.0014983371,0.00020049344,0.0003857417,0.0012523517,0.0011159049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98695964,0.0028879803,0.001344853,0.00026400064,0.0038983254,0.004645131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061532776,0.00060932466,0.00041385644,0.00076825777,0.0060855057,0.00764642,0.0019332966,0.0066602533,0.009939731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017222056,0.00032493917,0.0001864402,0.0006478476,0.006943368,0.0053805676,0.0026953327,0.0055154013,0.0032693723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017489548,0.00047827742,0.048931554,0.0011304228,0.000045832752,0.00050356035,0.007805044,0.00027454164,0.00087329483,0.021985345,0.415021,0.50277615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095138115,0.0005917023,0.076511145,0.0052557727,0.00008279786,0.001255285,0.10518483,0.0011316587,0.0018216921,0.028356351,0.77944624,0.00026732983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07523179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19416697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07523179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005997771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024346597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14958781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544132179","doi":"","title":"Reconsidering Res Judicata: A Comparative Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Res judicata; Scope (computer science); Doctrine; Law; Adversary; Political science; Action (physics); Law and economics; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.25700860748035,"score_gpt":0.3939149846991725,"score_spread":0.13690637721882254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544132179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011509591,0.041536007,0.0015421361,0.06892095,0.0015865499,0.00002499092,0.000042124568,0.0000187862,0.87481904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8288515,0.033351075,0.001253758,0.0514243,0.008731769,0.0001572189,0.000086191096,0.00009759124,0.07604666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864281,0.0075501506,0.00026670255,0.0011199428,0.0021248779,0.0025102173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98581034,0.010834867,0.00072883023,0.00041736691,0.0015635416,0.0006450108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011996257,0.0006199208,0.0008966108,0.0048899557,0.015728544,0.022954585,0.0037915837,0.020462705,0.0148002645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012692927,0.00053024484,0.0010339525,0.005073192,0.038957614,0.015756628,0.0050570513,0.01570348,0.0014655504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006261963,0.000009828132,0.00007044608,0.000028145707,0.0000026216437,0.00010537225,0.002375741,0.000046683494,0.000032843618,0.9917169,0.003996411,0.0016087138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041271072,0.00009313885,0.0022435677,0.00088685,0.000035818342,0.00028915587,0.026398417,0.0004788544,0.00024255246,0.351124,0.6181023,0.000064145635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045916364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07902678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045916364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03142516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010147052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2280066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546684010","doi":"","title":"How Robust is the Governance System of British Columbia for Regulating the Environmental Aspects of Shale Gas Development","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bradford Scholars (University of Bradford)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hydraulic fracturing; Legislation; Legislature; Transparency (behavior); Enforcement; Regulator; Corporate governance; Public participation; Environmental planning; Business; Sustainability; Shale gas; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Natural resource economics; Public administration; Political science; Oil shale; Environmental science; Engineering; Waste management; Law; Petroleum engineering; Finance; Economics","score_opus":0.012309182300582281,"score_gpt":0.18147243680116165,"score_spread":0.16916325450057937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546684010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5111401,0.0042804517,0.0071721375,0.09853284,0.00032403812,0.0004481092,0.0012702877,0.00018555931,0.37664652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98146766,0.0006809623,0.0015937665,0.0033087195,0.000019787001,0.000045705634,0.00012812791,0.000020035333,0.012735179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907706,0.0017106322,0.00029594684,0.0010117029,0.0026013101,0.0036097036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815555,0.0034990474,0.0017863318,0.001142351,0.008655193,0.0033615963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006464739,0.00019260195,0.00033309485,0.0024187798,0.008923352,0.012776575,0.0014872546,0.0019835455,0.0041410313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02090684,0.00033729573,0.0002018138,0.0023774665,0.00873926,0.0018298642,0.0018649227,0.0025884002,0.00037116406],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017182654,0.00017735767,0.16903168,0.00040531138,0.00028678126,0.0013270985,0.018685954,0.009785617,0.0052432436,0.5769516,0.06862468,0.14930885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011715501,0.0000970092,0.38306656,0.0011558749,0.00020529934,0.0003306878,0.035108633,0.0054185693,0.0027138505,0.060978685,0.5103186,0.00048905687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95955735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9818579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93440217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06559785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10930496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47594792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1548195955","doi":"","title":"Before You Host a Party Read This: Social Host Liability and the Decision in Childs v. Desormeaux","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Harm; Government (linguistics); Autonomy; Assertion; Duty; Political science; Law and economics; Duty of care; Law; Duty to protect; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.006028609463067668,"score_gpt":0.2610048106190587,"score_spread":0.25497620115599107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1548195955","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.122948006,0.00485761,0.002279425,0.52572584,0.002479486,0.00010648257,0.0002558765,0.00013860925,0.3412086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72834927,0.0013919983,0.0008365042,0.16140401,0.0009488675,0.00006487431,0.00007046515,0.00008068743,0.10685338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938777,0.0013832715,0.00019350843,0.0006276897,0.0016362636,0.0022815503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945802,0.003190997,0.0003675059,0.00015089879,0.0010075767,0.00070279505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004828308,0.00041727498,0.000491754,0.000747078,0.023925906,0.005922683,0.002312962,0.024527775,0.0055178027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012667735,0.000644706,0.00095041294,0.00077113375,0.012401396,0.0027796745,0.0032048405,0.012868925,0.000611326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008450974,0.00005308353,0.0058325767,0.000065114335,0.000024769684,0.008022169,0.027459864,0.0003151633,0.0006373144,0.7215988,0.22999094,0.0059156674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015631263,0.00017872824,0.014691715,0.0005694768,0.00014520335,0.002562212,0.05037588,0.001287114,0.0029902717,0.1202389,0.8065324,0.0002718614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5315123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67785794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5315123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015252804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017138023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9424934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W154997875","doi":"","title":"The Rules of Professional Conduct: A Conflicting Guide for Counsel in Child Custody and Access Proceedings","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Child custody; Professional conduct; Right to counsel; Psychology; Law; Legal ethics; Political science; Criminology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.13674393191880455,"score_gpt":0.4107299191758901,"score_spread":0.27398598725708556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W154997875","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011577427,0.018618343,0.32412636,0.37581518,0.00512246,0.0027620767,0.00033059463,0.002006336,0.25964135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10872073,0.014039162,0.7265322,0.06098429,0.0020681317,0.002414407,0.0003098648,0.00092466635,0.08400651],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9142385,0.056383766,0.0092023825,0.0017108954,0.016049668,0.0024147774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9298446,0.047734283,0.0029845724,0.00303474,0.012159491,0.004242301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.059133537,0.0010807929,0.0010330874,0.005469306,0.014673461,0.015666427,0.0043938984,0.015802054,0.0031429122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09749121,0.0023416113,0.00080930506,0.0028503053,0.019701764,0.010937333,0.00861161,0.015685793,0.0046701073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036723166,0.00018382362,0.0020954963,0.00040313724,0.000014701692,0.0020260143,0.08247211,0.001341458,0.0011063203,0.34806746,0.3691243,0.19312842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023380835,0.0000460383,0.0007450428,0.0013681157,0.000012354038,0.0018549049,0.019745605,0.0015986002,0.0003817745,0.10874367,0.8653433,0.00013742034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03671515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10761397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059133537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010281617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06444232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3127318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1550600082","doi":"","title":"The Case Against Same-Sex Marriage in Canada: Law and Policy Considerations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Meaning (existential); Law; Sociology; Foundation (evidence); Political science; Gender studies; Psychology","score_opus":0.01853885757025264,"score_gpt":0.23443851488100978,"score_spread":0.21589965731075714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1550600082","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042332754,0.020336729,0.0009418023,0.75578874,0.00093653717,0.0000822025,0.00018252821,0.00003193314,0.17936674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7224693,0.02081736,0.0013399591,0.2111604,0.00074606773,0.00009355295,0.000109217726,0.00003028075,0.043233912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877208,0.0015068735,0.00025693537,0.000707458,0.0035036292,0.006304266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886925,0.0051172907,0.0004948308,0.00020368418,0.0031452521,0.0023464381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071042953,0.00036275794,0.0006101659,0.0023350115,0.041205358,0.012773929,0.004682405,0.020976078,0.0066938624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020005513,0.00054824376,0.0007145021,0.004063612,0.017272903,0.004507616,0.004926934,0.013899875,0.00029761065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025539412,0.000025938727,0.003243939,0.0001331678,0.000012929938,0.001069097,0.012066162,0.0004297303,0.00019787805,0.91626567,0.0535054,0.013024653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010668674,0.000050844974,0.017801423,0.0019655847,0.00015713868,0.00097612216,0.06722191,0.0031896557,0.000683286,0.19494848,0.71259415,0.0003046605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9930837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14280668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14280668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29807636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99422276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552046944","doi":"","title":"Affording Discretion to Immigration Judges: A Comparison of Removal Proceedings in the United States and Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College international and comparative law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Discretion; Law; Political science; Commit; Immigration law; Convention; Waiver; Duty","score_opus":0.04280318097654043,"score_gpt":0.35181468779765557,"score_spread":0.3090115068211151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552046944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68573886,0.008196525,0.00068707584,0.017703453,0.00037304842,0.00034160234,0.0009245315,0.00008420199,0.2859507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794627,0.0034233434,0.00047316376,0.00457759,0.00006794082,0.000072899864,0.00048402295,0.0000432563,0.011395087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97151554,0.0018046763,0.0008070934,0.0010523024,0.012008942,0.012811474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722881,0.0069301277,0.002064533,0.00065411953,0.01239971,0.0056634624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006574871,0.00038444303,0.00091779785,0.007271646,0.028622596,0.01241872,0.0034026434,0.0039261696,0.0062169367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036492813,0.0007372965,0.0010595815,0.008946664,0.0076203914,0.0016268579,0.004660787,0.004342611,0.0004939959],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013348795,0.00088872813,0.23282859,0.0010846162,0.00079782313,0.007496982,0.13848944,0.0060826,0.0036905291,0.34569213,0.12082082,0.1407928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040813067,0.00023052556,0.609116,0.0012435417,0.0006030196,0.0009419809,0.14053218,0.003056921,0.0016198871,0.009075502,0.23254742,0.0006249832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9913386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99775666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8695329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1304671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20342271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9466095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552363372","doi":"","title":"Developments in Family Law: The 2003-2004 Term","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Law; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Term (time); Rhetorical question; Child support; Human settlement; Political science; Engineering; History","score_opus":0.011691896295613152,"score_gpt":0.2738257111976265,"score_spread":0.2621338149020134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552363372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19810718,0.101746,0.0014099239,0.20081882,0.0040874574,0.00013387125,0.0011521261,0.00008370221,0.49246094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8296139,0.019742167,0.0011873298,0.04023233,0.0014357221,0.00017895986,0.0004549228,0.000054890155,0.10709974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804974,0.00043693362,0.00013228945,0.00030084842,0.0005212725,0.0005589265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969214,0.0008614179,0.0005378127,0.00013866405,0.00060730206,0.0009335358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030702075,0.0001732738,0.0002658848,0.0015851952,0.008869783,0.0070375362,0.0012208208,0.0050124195,0.0051189912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008966774,0.0002776675,0.00029912827,0.0027565737,0.005074121,0.0032320067,0.0030807294,0.004949007,0.00072111667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016982795,0.00030466498,0.017052682,0.0002761,0.00002125859,0.0040742387,0.042238526,0.0003812528,0.0012251303,0.64117694,0.15974502,0.13333431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000094199195,0.000053212174,0.03216519,0.00036970293,0.0000069260423,0.00076544384,0.0062981956,0.00008938573,0.00027398136,0.0063607637,0.95358574,0.00002201665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20138091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29012764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20138091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03165548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014194815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4004175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553727096","doi":"","title":"Hydro Law and the Future of Hydroelectric Power Generation in the United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vanderbilt law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hydroelectricity; Renewable energy; Natural resource economics; Greenhouse gas; Environmental protection; Business; Environmental science; Economics; Engineering; Ecology","score_opus":0.023770949653074303,"score_gpt":0.2989259806843814,"score_spread":0.2751550310313071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553727096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05432896,0.032881748,0.0042702174,0.1990985,0.0019980036,0.000032708103,0.0013360722,0.00014793266,0.7059059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80222017,0.025136242,0.0029953066,0.017864652,0.0021292057,0.00008306965,0.0006283257,0.000073182266,0.14886978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999744,0.000054963966,0.000012618477,0.000030076093,0.00010276204,0.000055609853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994493,0.00017293818,0.00007274858,0.000022741302,0.00020717284,0.000074980744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004973277,0.0001520455,0.000070828806,0.00059898524,0.0012246112,0.002440701,0.00030034565,0.00133381,0.0135904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015081126,0.00015553412,0.00014316496,0.00075324305,0.0013930816,0.0023594315,0.00085686514,0.0015980112,0.0010347915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003838653,0.000025831117,0.004874279,0.00009125904,0.000006781139,0.00026908342,0.00038487907,0.004398455,0.00036382113,0.76988673,0.16131769,0.058342807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013893492,0.000040274226,0.010356227,0.00035595254,0.0000068640766,0.00016577927,0.0007514338,0.003570335,0.00030216717,0.1928673,0.7915389,0.00003083009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03281857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06426837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03281857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035844622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032111576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065255046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555251283","doi":"","title":"Case Comment: In re Dewey Ranch Hockey","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Franchise; League; Phoenix; Insolvency; Asset (computer security); Political science; Law; Business; Advertising; History; Marketing; Computer security; Metropolitan area; Archaeology","score_opus":0.012786369947064596,"score_gpt":0.2921498761164307,"score_spread":0.27936350616936606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555251283","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04934575,0.0044405293,0.0009141437,0.7371788,0.011737334,0.00023592864,0.0005682742,0.00015251013,0.19542682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14336653,0.0027889258,0.0005616519,0.5724579,0.0035257444,0.00019067082,0.00024296565,0.00008210189,0.27678353],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837166,0.00018436648,0.000078591045,0.00042807456,0.00037893746,0.00055845885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987974,0.0006655439,0.00007468499,0.00004458802,0.00027447141,0.00014336543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011599604,0.0006855348,0.00053561205,0.00056747114,0.01049312,0.0038040606,0.0022123463,0.022644782,0.013239906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006821939,0.00062197406,0.0005779094,0.00060183334,0.0021372817,0.0022501915,0.0018335293,0.025040917,0.0027916818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011378297,0.00006763311,0.0030089281,0.0001341983,0.000026819982,0.016619803,0.009149902,0.0002297094,0.0011093068,0.051287584,0.90867925,0.009573011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037281585,0.00012032771,0.0074562286,0.0005141827,0.00005711793,0.004676245,0.018513694,0.00039632997,0.0014100596,0.0051286854,0.96159065,0.00009914923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12482272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23350929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12482272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005055763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004861953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24819237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556090743","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511611490.004","title":"The Watergate Effect: Or, Why Is the Ethics Bar Constantly Rising?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Geography; Meteorology","score_opus":0.03792707005990208,"score_gpt":0.25454010726362825,"score_spread":0.21661303720372616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556090743","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036704103,0.019139178,0.0053091445,0.4727031,0.00466447,0.000033226184,0.00009454731,0.00013181136,0.49425408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.195727,0.015036817,0.0031700218,0.23795135,0.0044140355,0.00017292165,0.00010885094,0.0005132901,0.5429057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655473,0.0010267398,0.00007767032,0.0005868079,0.0012933539,0.00046066506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967513,0.0021832006,0.00015607096,0.00025560157,0.00043955073,0.00021442553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042863963,0.0005492017,0.0005359736,0.001249563,0.004351144,0.01165741,0.0014265317,0.010140874,0.018200697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008719303,0.00037238593,0.00042294894,0.0014887034,0.027315173,0.02178552,0.0046946676,0.0140389735,0.0043964316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036857155,0.0000048973766,0.00006825051,0.000026633496,0.0000015279205,0.000022420681,0.0011988853,0.000028224362,0.000035586236,0.9294109,0.061391205,0.007807882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009265809,0.0000065843233,0.00023738891,0.00018314163,0.0000029864948,0.000040381638,0.0013116922,0.00010553995,0.00013044506,0.3307542,0.6672071,0.000011227808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015818235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018415432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018200697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008473401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007380039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06147909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1558207436","doi":"","title":"The Evolution of a New Pleading Standard: Ashcroft v. Iqbal","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Merck Canada Inc. (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Pleading; Supreme court; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Civil procedure; Law; Lawsuit; Scrutiny; Summary judgment; Political science; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Economics","score_opus":0.015279418772501722,"score_gpt":0.3099208083664389,"score_spread":0.2946413895939372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1558207436","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10345111,0.006254191,0.1717167,0.12061852,0.002545534,0.0002970959,0.00019327605,0.00076634047,0.5941573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85909575,0.0013772402,0.042587917,0.061664302,0.0010579918,0.00031485787,0.00011564662,0.00023404899,0.033552144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95828277,0.009545426,0.0019433151,0.0053759087,0.022189641,0.0026629257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96320075,0.021946242,0.0022344354,0.003614342,0.008058452,0.0009456954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028657187,0.0004884006,0.0007836198,0.0033177352,0.008263384,0.0147788385,0.004823544,0.016039312,0.0039955503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06015789,0.0008804343,0.0008496827,0.0016466673,0.022866592,0.012753723,0.0057807122,0.01889983,0.0010709439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020643702,0.000027504298,0.00054003723,0.000024176721,0.000005645208,0.00007100054,0.0010877253,0.0002405826,0.0004931971,0.97416604,0.005531949,0.017791547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014588222,0.00031808938,0.0052232244,0.0005116025,0.00006851723,0.00045571788,0.0012394402,0.0035415452,0.0045204316,0.7851301,0.19848575,0.0003596893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02361577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028954268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028657187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011773021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010241388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15155548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564720906","doi":"10.1353/esc.2003.0027","title":"Making a Bad Law Worse","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English studies in Canada","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Capilano University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Parliament; Pornography; Criminal code; Government (linguistics); Economic Justice; Convict; Sociology; Criminal law; Political science; Criminology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06546488233032925,"score_gpt":0.3465956979901178,"score_spread":0.28113081565978854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564720906","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002072705,0.010052195,0.0013230819,0.65306926,0.055898696,0.000052491498,0.00006469483,0.00018704224,0.2772798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03805504,0.005284942,0.00070765405,0.5807431,0.0118255,0.00007221503,0.00008566208,0.00035648773,0.3628696],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98560834,0.0035824594,0.0004479127,0.002590617,0.0042377748,0.0035329175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98466706,0.0034738204,0.0006630677,0.0017701883,0.0042239516,0.005201898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010445268,0.0012243523,0.0010386988,0.0015700997,0.026614515,0.02611697,0.0019429058,0.019233702,0.07203437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032318957,0.00082903716,0.00082602026,0.0007359147,0.023122802,0.017244862,0.0109140575,0.0409413,0.022857133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017697028,0.000057801535,0.00028559568,0.00003361481,0.0000090370595,0.00012031201,0.0008957921,0.000070631664,0.00010332765,0.13241968,0.8491789,0.016807573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010098803,0.000019406394,0.0002675998,0.00015443993,0.0000055031574,0.00006402544,0.0014788818,0.000058798003,0.00010350714,0.03348746,0.96432555,0.000024678006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018756716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029799117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07203437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076060095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016592797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24097896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564827554","doi":"","title":"Court of Appeals of New York: Hurrell-Harring v. State","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Touro law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; State (computer science); Political science; Right to counsel; Supreme court","score_opus":0.11903171212421901,"score_gpt":0.3335821471066135,"score_spread":0.21455043498239448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564827554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018939076,0.030021224,0.0007946179,0.13275847,0.008269164,0.00079326564,0.015917553,0.00036159478,0.7921451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07391399,0.0058325646,0.00063454144,0.07319374,0.0019752923,0.0012171641,0.002702812,0.00013694624,0.84039295],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983606,0.000118727265,0.00008410646,0.00024200643,0.0007315939,0.0004629534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997482,0.0014220779,0.00008466826,0.0000965823,0.0006450525,0.00026964492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017252999,0.0009284273,0.0010263934,0.0015981452,0.009943928,0.005573793,0.0018682905,0.01613163,0.069867745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075279465,0.0015208081,0.0008071955,0.0015475272,0.0016271423,0.0021868723,0.0016695212,0.010371004,0.011110334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009369598,0.00006520835,0.0017280107,0.000113526105,0.000018781382,0.0008651845,0.00063179777,0.00012517333,0.00066229893,0.05920118,0.9254402,0.011054971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013495305,0.000028693623,0.0100671705,0.00053561217,0.000043572334,0.00011712777,0.00081370503,0.00047613826,0.00032839304,0.008423679,0.9789539,0.000076950426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38261566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6418349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38261566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009721486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01861578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7607772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1567662657","doi":"","title":"Special Recognition: St. John's University School of Law Honors Alumni Who Have Served as Chief Judge of the United States Court of International Trade","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.019819839416979172,"score_gpt":0.2524379773725229,"score_spread":0.2326181379555437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1567662657","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046648826,0.005897501,0.00042872757,0.50683403,0.262117,0.00027156665,0.00055627275,0.00038048558,0.21884957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018008469,0.0024164054,0.00035622052,0.033144187,0.032246344,0.000068402194,0.000251782,0.00010139525,0.91340685],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993425,0.000050604034,0.000040249975,0.00007529933,0.00030784964,0.00018347756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99451905,0.0004719477,0.0002302531,0.0001067648,0.002457734,0.0022142369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083193043,0.0006934488,0.0006968829,0.0009177388,0.0039807474,0.0030555846,0.0007743938,0.0042326767,0.17177315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003934807,0.000434406,0.00032665403,0.00044478933,0.0006492977,0.0015170607,0.0015331468,0.00503511,0.04159],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057620196,0.000013095467,0.00015534023,0.0000108264885,7.158708e-7,0.000041098538,0.000041517495,0.000004317925,0.000051210183,0.00032865803,0.9943416,0.005005712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014254622,0.000031624444,0.0032166513,0.00007761883,0.000006844545,0.00026413807,0.0011255797,0.0001408806,0.0001788511,0.0004918945,0.99443454,0.00001708828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008084055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03437504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17177315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012472526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024101564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5746384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1571195437","doi":"10.1002/9781444323405.ch2","title":"Legal Requirements for Producers Selling Canned Fish into North America","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fish <Actinopterygii>; Business; Fishery; Commerce; Biology","score_opus":0.022101703580191128,"score_gpt":0.3099311853725766,"score_spread":0.28782948179238543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1571195437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020417858,0.0014367675,0.00231815,0.02212727,0.0011625842,0.001317376,0.005753055,0.000887995,0.9445788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07806749,0.0031712991,0.021951232,0.04151206,0.0005413393,0.0019518115,0.007124772,0.00051441824,0.84516555],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904553,0.00081008265,0.0008563594,0.0006248954,0.0059495955,0.0013037439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796198,0.0049728174,0.00091435417,0.0008702487,0.012697814,0.00092488003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061794026,0.00050055794,0.00053359696,0.00247612,0.009224706,0.0051280255,0.0027871523,0.007230973,0.042521786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013629289,0.0012205936,0.00082809455,0.001962021,0.0019471417,0.0024212997,0.0015818223,0.0045861946,0.012802236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101306665,0.00037420128,0.006618955,0.00043164098,0.000014159399,0.001075004,0.005347679,0.00046043211,0.005320778,0.14275254,0.7828717,0.0546317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035199217,0.00003876747,0.019318983,0.00040004702,0.000021580681,0.00020597113,0.0018326294,0.00022790035,0.0010721252,0.0033807028,0.97340673,0.000059361337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5508324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.693995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5508324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011864928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06592721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9036257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572505345","doi":"","title":"Mr. Garland Goes to Ottawa: Comments on Restitution in Canada through the Lens of Garland v. Consumers' Gas","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Loyola of Los Angeles law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Lens (geology); Political science; Law; Physics; Optics","score_opus":0.03335572446463545,"score_gpt":0.3034290228093618,"score_spread":0.2700732983447263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572505345","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005934772,0.010340945,0.0001611039,0.93143725,0.0031448314,0.000060005186,0.00046147202,0.000046854002,0.048412684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07998486,0.008338088,0.00042602688,0.79142445,0.0015953908,0.000089209,0.00015778275,0.000106130945,0.117878],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917664,0.00088410504,0.00038977695,0.00072446634,0.0030945514,0.003140816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9805833,0.008782056,0.00064558216,0.00029566715,0.007547638,0.00214567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058792206,0.0009387214,0.0010087842,0.0022730366,0.043684904,0.009451121,0.0066059795,0.0448214,0.0125204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023407515,0.0010476311,0.0011966212,0.004050462,0.012767341,0.0029443563,0.0025730822,0.023141304,0.0013544533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003762052,0.000010389652,0.0012785319,0.00008925773,0.000015917336,0.00055944105,0.0056519085,0.00014483498,0.00013296028,0.02685419,0.9624602,0.0027648371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044967157,0.000022943817,0.009061169,0.0007213323,0.00009851985,0.00015879015,0.025658503,0.00027754833,0.0004752195,0.0051683816,0.958048,0.00026473118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99132043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09971341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09971341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14965768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7234748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576082661","doi":"","title":"Deference to the Majority: Why Isn't the Supreme Court Applying the Reasoning of Atkins v. Virginia to Juveniles","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Loyola of Los Angeles law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.031230243542506884,"score_gpt":0.3086106831929167,"score_spread":0.2773804396504098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576082661","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07241479,0.022560252,0.0043504294,0.71892095,0.0060323947,0.00008226918,0.000099069526,0.00007534039,0.17546459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.782892,0.0056337714,0.0014150251,0.17625697,0.0033911762,0.00008536615,0.000046074514,0.00006123559,0.030218424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98846835,0.0043055336,0.00031069215,0.0014012831,0.0034952753,0.0020187735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904643,0.004027531,0.00059922517,0.00042974736,0.0028531027,0.0016260651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011317509,0.00019738235,0.0005081948,0.0010833483,0.011783211,0.006046605,0.0026497836,0.0073921774,0.0035398332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038186904,0.000381263,0.00042386013,0.0008197403,0.009671796,0.0046128025,0.0030184,0.010204777,0.00074501266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003728533,0.00004536294,0.002626753,0.00007966456,0.000023791737,0.0007403648,0.007905528,0.00016640789,0.00039927018,0.757178,0.18790872,0.042888816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011628725,0.00014821373,0.007219669,0.001088768,0.00006380456,0.00037205353,0.014740872,0.000452504,0.00078771653,0.29098716,0.68390846,0.00011443439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10347442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16324048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10347442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069908043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01158298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20574433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W157926775","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1062","title":"New Brunswick (Minister of Health and Community Services) v. G.(J.): En Route to More Equitable Access to the Legal System","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.03671431630726523,"score_gpt":0.37204518587448204,"score_spread":0.3353308695672168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W157926775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030217282,0.0073193526,0.001615274,0.33634204,0.002887727,0.0005557755,0.0010991753,0.0001498428,0.6198135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23553166,0.0053852997,0.005016792,0.32864884,0.00044447032,0.00046604197,0.00046272558,0.000115779614,0.4239284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931335,0.0009536598,0.0002902802,0.000589163,0.0020602914,0.0029731467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942887,0.0014358353,0.00034335876,0.0003199786,0.0021084016,0.001503706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060754344,0.00049939106,0.0004173506,0.0008962102,0.0128896525,0.0074820677,0.002857254,0.011956753,0.011961785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010827147,0.0008428218,0.00076970836,0.0015978545,0.0048115375,0.002985918,0.0032390405,0.011769781,0.0011765694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076264274,0.000070289236,0.008623726,0.00021315497,0.00002772338,0.0011091192,0.0080662975,0.0002495216,0.0016199738,0.6545771,0.30600876,0.019358061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014212103,0.0000719565,0.019575797,0.00062464114,0.00006462817,0.0002696253,0.005782865,0.00030482814,0.0011294336,0.019638747,0.95227027,0.00012499151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9478001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98887783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05668579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05668579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20507148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41128612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579884250","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2012.01441.x","title":"SAME SEX, DIFFERENT RIGHTS: AMENDING U.S. IMMIGRATION LAW TO RECOGNIZE SAME‐SEX PARTNERS OF REFUGEES AND ASYLEES","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Refugee; Persecution; Legislation; Immigration law; Political science; Law; Immigration reform; Population; Refugee law; Sociology; Politics; Demography","score_opus":0.03907273651068179,"score_gpt":0.35761914716710147,"score_spread":0.3185464106564197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579884250","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06733543,0.17240599,0.005248432,0.4615369,0.013726865,0.00045842488,0.00024182118,0.00012195738,0.27892414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57341343,0.056173563,0.008003541,0.305572,0.003764006,0.00044848057,0.00022990504,0.000070284616,0.052324776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9808881,0.007791597,0.0021979315,0.0014704264,0.005177508,0.0024744954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9594116,0.026850792,0.0018745216,0.0015855348,0.008967012,0.0013104891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032873593,0.00036874463,0.00075972336,0.0029323131,0.012215069,0.010875407,0.00284747,0.021470666,0.0016800434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046899553,0.0008326807,0.0010219476,0.0020820284,0.01197876,0.0072408486,0.0038885286,0.015832264,0.0005090701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030344714,0.00009634641,0.0026066615,0.00041857763,0.000021229287,0.001060623,0.012035467,0.00042632723,0.00069154816,0.8344795,0.10441154,0.043721683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081476486,0.00014128821,0.008007711,0.0035910872,0.00013470148,0.0005792762,0.011157532,0.0007443425,0.0012782649,0.07621934,0.89791495,0.00014991764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21310389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33510092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21310389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013215571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42372698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580971803","doi":"","title":"Teck Cominco and the Wisdom of Deferring to the Court First Seised, All Things Being Equal","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.014420732576537667,"score_gpt":0.258138203470031,"score_spread":0.24371747089349335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1580971803","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018965723,0.009201987,0.005966966,0.53907824,0.0022676596,0.00004725037,0.00021230035,0.000051944287,0.42420805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7443399,0.0040514814,0.004695249,0.15718581,0.0023594091,0.000114203234,0.000084773834,0.00016665178,0.08700255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843709,0.0042350623,0.0005587431,0.0027766114,0.0045119403,0.0035467912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9784958,0.011747116,0.0013857057,0.0019411397,0.0049840827,0.0014462352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01260301,0.00046653286,0.00085718324,0.0014156894,0.02132245,0.015524601,0.0024206247,0.023066226,0.008500457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03981735,0.0005267813,0.00057033176,0.0021527696,0.05043458,0.013119364,0.004087507,0.01968802,0.0011868711],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015161185,0.000004897034,0.00015847014,0.000013004187,0.0000036366166,0.000035164318,0.0008066665,0.00010674477,0.000025903853,0.9790597,0.01774156,0.0020292061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035662317,0.000011312593,0.00051397935,0.00015151825,0.000014101916,0.00006025255,0.0012081108,0.0004740817,0.00021898594,0.8626289,0.134635,0.000048087255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24857114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27083087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24857114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025919281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053492963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49424863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584604341","doi":"","title":"A 'Reasoned Apprehension' of Overbreadth: An Alternative Approach to the Problems Presented by S.163.1 of the Criminal Code","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Possession (linguistics); Child pornography; Pornography; Political science; Law; Criminology; Criminalization; Criminal code; Psychology; Criminal law; The Internet; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021126682576148505,"score_gpt":0.2894608271191765,"score_spread":0.26833414454302795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1584604341","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025697976,0.004953674,0.04011444,0.42429283,0.0054883603,0.00018445951,0.00032786297,0.0003015626,0.4986389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6742074,0.0032251417,0.028395407,0.13031065,0.0024976975,0.0004069462,0.00017199878,0.0003137567,0.16047093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876417,0.0041149706,0.00034420798,0.0014273827,0.0043160114,0.0021556886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992581,0.0035294,0.00051059603,0.0007609173,0.0022597748,0.0003583218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010630367,0.00073880376,0.0007722946,0.0023778342,0.012837768,0.014589535,0.004813911,0.014753178,0.0064917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018200804,0.00044097853,0.001102191,0.0019505352,0.04224892,0.008299483,0.0039018758,0.019693526,0.00096590957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035837143,0.0000036106746,0.00010966861,0.000008853137,0.0000017461565,0.00006474651,0.004400721,0.000084146486,0.000042728156,0.98472786,0.008468095,0.002084266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002174226,0.000034495555,0.0013261846,0.0004725684,0.00002416467,0.00031111029,0.019630868,0.0020774538,0.00057108165,0.5245158,0.45089206,0.00012235476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5359602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6001099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5359602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03200756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039847877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93354523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586771993","doi":"10.21991/c9cq10","title":"TERMINAL CARE, TERMINAL JUSTICE: THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA AND SUE RODRIGUEZ","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Terminal (telecommunication); Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Remand (court procedure); Engineering; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.02368763410841072,"score_gpt":0.2618966319644512,"score_spread":0.23820899785604047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586771993","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06006272,0.02800173,0.0007561131,0.7508124,0.0039356505,0.00019308188,0.00070229074,0.000049386763,0.15548657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5548849,0.013956922,0.0013750398,0.33656415,0.003018058,0.000268426,0.0003015868,0.00013933622,0.08949161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832945,0.0019334203,0.00045430614,0.0014342497,0.0043479293,0.008535533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977007,0.009107886,0.00074566266,0.00040785404,0.0061885943,0.0065431725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014280249,0.0008548728,0.0023025747,0.0021362323,0.066996455,0.02486416,0.0077367313,0.055144414,0.008383125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0415668,0.001556056,0.0017441325,0.004359947,0.019191897,0.0057088137,0.0059208637,0.04703153,0.00057876983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017038194,0.00014341893,0.0048325043,0.00010043824,0.00012121071,0.0013769721,0.008215857,0.0012528945,0.00027118274,0.6614745,0.31206784,0.009972856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006256055,0.00010843044,0.03179196,0.0022372133,0.00068815466,0.00050806976,0.04238287,0.004715366,0.00084469636,0.19985501,0.71511817,0.0011244036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9867199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99526817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8438502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1561498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3601785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9787466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586780762","doi":"10.20381/ruor-11103","title":"The \"Faint Hope Clause\" (C.C.C. s.745.6): The judicial review process with special reference to the 1996 amendments.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"uO Research (University of Ottawa)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Political science; Linguistics; Law; Computer science; Philosophy; Programming language","score_opus":0.06519627041496201,"score_gpt":0.38183711503215545,"score_spread":0.31664084461719344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586780762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21774688,0.022860434,0.011933884,0.07779223,0.0059152185,0.0028310071,0.021032805,0.0010590773,0.6388285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6246251,0.0054394426,0.009990316,0.053870387,0.0016537708,0.0016305414,0.008308282,0.00019370815,0.2942885],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832313,0.0026336405,0.0018977027,0.0012883812,0.007779468,0.0031694246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97905344,0.007426031,0.0050316397,0.002444027,0.0049653635,0.0010795515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011819145,0.00049373275,0.00040501048,0.00232107,0.00448443,0.0068578,0.0021683099,0.0054386607,0.007362019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044569973,0.00083378743,0.0005320391,0.0040624267,0.005181091,0.002516804,0.0023508663,0.0043691243,0.0029613571],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035990425,0.00017120583,0.036378067,0.00046108154,0.000053755706,0.000785404,0.00766557,0.0012107694,0.00257037,0.24565807,0.6056057,0.09908007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015753008,0.00028579283,0.21093242,0.0007177044,0.00006268887,0.000421656,0.0034516817,0.00057848135,0.0017531225,0.012965038,0.7684628,0.00021109024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.512215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66658485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48778498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01183674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027337244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9813153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588414815","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1021","title":"Section 15(1) at the Supreme Court 2001-2002: Caution and Conflict in Defining “The Most Difficult Right”","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Section (typography); Jurisprudence; Political science; High Court; Sociology","score_opus":0.036268995179990327,"score_gpt":0.2895490815012053,"score_spread":0.25328008632121496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588414815","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036903236,0.0098333,0.007082754,0.63256425,0.005167281,0.00022455407,0.0025591939,0.00017587355,0.3054896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30690312,0.0038096288,0.0142486105,0.58777595,0.0028613403,0.00030082054,0.0006199858,0.00021780595,0.08326275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95296186,0.0093038175,0.003906403,0.0039990447,0.023137301,0.0066915276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9665613,0.018698167,0.0017681008,0.00109125,0.009859934,0.0020211784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028596712,0.0006706096,0.0013771645,0.002266745,0.024475787,0.018243633,0.0064692027,0.031970028,0.0030113996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05372076,0.0016372671,0.0013429577,0.0031134114,0.018545851,0.005030597,0.003511013,0.03054343,0.0010223497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054866483,0.00003419497,0.002983433,0.0002056772,0.000049420938,0.0004997235,0.016686847,0.00044287738,0.00084666425,0.61959034,0.3471583,0.011447594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011173609,0.000047428908,0.019618634,0.0018053227,0.00018011042,0.0003923988,0.009361868,0.0007325348,0.002718982,0.13510808,0.8295695,0.00035338476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8582513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94244057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8582513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053817876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.108549535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39047784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1589311579","doi":"","title":"A Review of the Year in Family Law: \"Same-Sex\" Marriage Issue Dominates Headlines","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"University of Oklahoma College of Law - Digital Commons (University of Oklahoma)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Legislature; State (computer science); Same sex; Political science; Constitutional law; Power (physics); Constitutional right; Constitutional court; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.03476449023720474,"score_gpt":0.2773891674839094,"score_spread":0.24262467724670467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1589311579","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006611144,0.99751174,0.000018608787,0.0007608313,0.0004225843,0.0000059320005,0.000040022358,0.000002075011,0.0011720427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00079715997,0.99758685,0.00004444836,0.00096994604,0.00019914864,0.000006238949,0.000043695945,0.0000018343438,0.00035066792],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879515,0.00033476553,0.00017623197,0.00014909731,0.00048787572,0.000056839326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940415,0.0027369685,0.0007106153,0.0001063198,0.002215127,0.0001894291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00251303,0.0005179491,0.0015308419,0.0065799337,0.0008054813,0.0020070958,0.000847043,0.0015152891,0.005601111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007462073,0.00055764324,0.0005413175,0.013592792,0.0010290395,0.002370388,0.00065100606,0.0018397684,0.0018010143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006291571,0.00004135595,0.0007843166,0.049791355,0.00012829762,0.00010713025,0.0002867397,0.00010872715,0.00024954227,0.00488694,0.2690641,0.6744885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007966678,0.000048400427,0.002330149,0.033938847,0.0001334401,0.00021504503,0.00019932503,0.000013455678,0.00007052423,0.00039977985,0.96263295,0.000010107907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016545275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048252996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016545275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028226452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008548844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03289795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1589896724","doi":"10.25071/1916-9272.34372","title":"A Case for Personal Meetings with the Federal Ethics Commissioner","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Public Policy Administration and Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Public relations; Public administration","score_opus":0.15228820699522647,"score_gpt":0.3732721237450636,"score_spread":0.2209839167498371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1589896724","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093259886,0.002998284,0.012091384,0.66114575,0.004299374,0.00017217983,0.00003542707,0.00012920231,0.22586852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8458366,0.0005354913,0.0045388537,0.11606177,0.0014937235,0.00020899862,0.000024136516,0.00010152825,0.031198865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8565695,0.09777354,0.0028185658,0.006673056,0.015654532,0.020510739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8609381,0.07535079,0.013004109,0.009283235,0.01297389,0.028449956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05971066,0.00042586165,0.00046859487,0.001642503,0.054755636,0.012826629,0.0034002995,0.022099951,0.0071634566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11802883,0.00086907914,0.00093785994,0.0013606462,0.02589552,0.014768899,0.0133474665,0.032666817,0.001129096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054502725,0.00023317085,0.006523807,0.00009917542,0.000030972493,0.0061235167,0.20085688,0.00022656968,0.00053602323,0.61173916,0.14064609,0.03293019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037083253,0.00006314057,0.0049706954,0.0007362051,0.000023156741,0.0032681136,0.15577981,0.0009071356,0.0004794161,0.0768315,0.7567612,0.00014243717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051817596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08754729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9795593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020440694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03062068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31578398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594843427","doi":"","title":"Immortal beloved and beleaguered: towards the integration of the law on assisted death and the scientific pursuit of life extension.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Assisted suicide; Context (archaeology); Autonomy; Law; Political science; Position (finance); Psychology; History","score_opus":0.04968530628510512,"score_gpt":0.26718454399845115,"score_spread":0.21749923771334603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1594843427","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007182863,0.11169344,0.0127304895,0.7603845,0.005281374,0.00008280084,0.00005290291,0.000058271784,0.10253337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44200453,0.11125604,0.0149131995,0.38144392,0.005822664,0.00022816352,0.00013191815,0.0000920872,0.04410746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97947127,0.009248874,0.00058114866,0.0014188047,0.007459045,0.0018209127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9649415,0.022431046,0.002005559,0.001895805,0.005839307,0.0028867987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03358398,0.00044107865,0.00062154327,0.001828539,0.011307446,0.015844306,0.0033370878,0.017103257,0.0013551158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034807697,0.00039162397,0.00059251394,0.0015991551,0.10886883,0.011668826,0.01105656,0.018725127,0.00036232226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008824473,0.0000090054145,0.00030451725,0.00011433639,0.000003866213,0.0001513286,0.012046308,0.000096963326,0.00009346971,0.95450056,0.017407361,0.015263516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014736349,0.000040534997,0.0011852396,0.0014066009,0.000015118217,0.000310974,0.013831237,0.00030204907,0.00046202287,0.40292227,0.5794511,0.000058218116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25437075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40974206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25437075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03593311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.101636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5057803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595478172","doi":"","title":"Disentangling Disparate Impact and Disparate Treatment: Adapting the Canadian Approach","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disparate impact; Disparate treatment; Statutory law; Context (archaeology); Employment discrimination; Political science; Federal court; Court decision; Law and economics; Statutory interpretation; Disparate system; Law; Actuarial science; Business; Economics; Labour law; Civil rights; Supreme court; History","score_opus":0.02323000181431923,"score_gpt":0.3011056711042784,"score_spread":0.27787566928995916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595478172","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010703416,0.02203974,0.14037283,0.23956738,0.0039756587,0.00049065944,0.00033888075,0.00014635488,0.5823651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6908398,0.027758535,0.105383545,0.10173964,0.0042771893,0.00092723884,0.00024856796,0.00030505587,0.06852043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95902675,0.013223944,0.0013052741,0.0033691323,0.018964332,0.0041106283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97331196,0.0142023275,0.0010467471,0.0020418386,0.0079356255,0.0014614102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03479304,0.0018004845,0.0030590175,0.016389597,0.024269918,0.017846381,0.007442354,0.011552397,0.009545747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057167362,0.0011450573,0.0024603584,0.011108453,0.08642035,0.017119762,0.013802321,0.01811767,0.0008977122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008119891,0.000010867459,0.00044411112,0.000047419468,0.000015999454,0.000065743996,0.001366847,0.0001880355,0.00002755267,0.9823521,0.0041802744,0.0112930285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025269948,0.000011597992,0.0011377025,0.00038029172,0.000073348565,0.00009782341,0.001678033,0.0015092664,0.00007802212,0.9463052,0.048652254,0.00005117211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78897923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8720819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21102077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10087586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13471188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73190904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599508463","doi":"","title":"SEEKING JUSTICE IN THE EMPIRE STATE: COURT OF APPEALS BROADENS THE REACH OF LONG ARM JURISDICTION AND CLARIFIES THE STATUTORY GUIDELINES FOR APPLICATION OF CPLR SECTION 302(A)(1)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"American Bar Foundation","keywords":"Law; Plaintiff; Statute; Jurisdiction; Statutory law; Political science; Personal jurisdiction; Original jurisdiction; Supreme court; Common law; State (computer science); Sociology","score_opus":0.03178343934061472,"score_gpt":0.3303585305879274,"score_spread":0.2985750912473127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599508463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07206817,0.0035863388,0.018530665,0.20481011,0.0020861733,0.00036778327,0.00025829766,0.00020770819,0.6980849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8089491,0.0013869167,0.0051200534,0.11943179,0.0019948084,0.00039612388,0.00012297131,0.00013547487,0.062462647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9781681,0.005106121,0.0013631387,0.0033483664,0.00639563,0.005618651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96892345,0.022623347,0.0011702073,0.0015460264,0.004028819,0.0017081656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02572264,0.00056884205,0.0013122832,0.0023461774,0.017688943,0.020392826,0.004034859,0.029499948,0.008916119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044170216,0.0013759133,0.0010261162,0.0017508593,0.023149598,0.011817486,0.011939854,0.035581548,0.001492784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019105264,0.000024780422,0.0009145985,0.000028388793,0.000012052391,0.0007409121,0.0035014567,0.0002685961,0.0003662164,0.96768415,0.021604335,0.0048353733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015310425,0.00012546731,0.0044511943,0.0010765637,0.000095935546,0.00056692277,0.0050134547,0.0038248352,0.0012565622,0.52471936,0.45844308,0.0002735347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16354859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2833736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16354859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019276239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04887748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3251933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1601795522","doi":"10.58948/0738-6206.1067","title":"2007 Judges' Edition Bench Memorandum: Nineteenth Annual Pace National Environmental Law Moot Court Competition","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pace Environmental Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Memorandum; Pace; Law; Competition (biology); Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.012279588474115968,"score_gpt":0.2740705536509881,"score_spread":0.2617909651768721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1601795522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049341484,0.0017341513,0.00077400065,0.071844235,0.010405935,0.00042829837,0.0032705856,0.00032343922,0.90628517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01575267,0.0009725962,0.0009132701,0.0984538,0.0016363268,0.0005485034,0.0009746849,0.00016588409,0.8805823],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946424,0.00047212842,0.00030661395,0.00084101566,0.0024203828,0.0013175166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968027,0.0010353423,0.000107746135,0.00031278632,0.0013818928,0.00035955236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005147363,0.00093545666,0.00091894926,0.0015717467,0.013064863,0.013915086,0.0038236992,0.024721298,0.07507949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010092544,0.0013356984,0.0015569251,0.0014108529,0.0029874386,0.003981001,0.004679772,0.017480861,0.04324663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002500717,0.00007797496,0.00036538966,0.000035860183,0.0000069190805,0.00024401557,0.00027421518,0.00011760254,0.00020472845,0.055273633,0.93857837,0.0047961846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025159783,0.00001784191,0.0011241855,0.00020168246,0.0000125010965,0.00005558663,0.00046707818,0.00023864041,0.0002667113,0.005741263,0.99180704,0.00004225599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09709794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21466354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09709794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009171178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020991629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25116593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1601954506","doi":"","title":"Penal Policy and Penal Legislation in Recent American Experience","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Imprisonment; Legislature; Nothing; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Law; Period (music); Criminology; History; Sociology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.024384431658852526,"score_gpt":0.35997671957770305,"score_spread":0.33559228791885054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1601954506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41327667,0.03022965,0.0010208361,0.23850289,0.0022226986,0.000026648986,0.00020226823,0.00009209771,0.31442627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8584735,0.02777109,0.0006208798,0.045849226,0.0010055985,0.000056654677,0.00019251119,0.00006196793,0.065968655],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996009,0.001873504,0.00015561614,0.00023739199,0.0008923853,0.0008320156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937615,0.0022166253,0.00091220974,0.0002016698,0.0011305959,0.0017773526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028472631,0.00016116438,0.0002419397,0.001887263,0.01142647,0.0051117013,0.00076467195,0.0030447417,0.008387118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007712014,0.00028562493,0.000196285,0.0048398236,0.008045409,0.0047304854,0.0042367163,0.006661992,0.0007674379],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007720839,0.0008457602,0.040607445,0.00031543212,0.000021946169,0.0019859888,0.32168314,0.00040016414,0.00050394516,0.1971201,0.22737262,0.20906629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067076685,0.00005537074,0.035177495,0.00025923384,0.000007643585,0.0007657623,0.090255536,0.00011781406,0.00013064018,0.0041924175,0.8689916,0.000039662355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057928298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18531765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057928298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007060863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007444256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11518222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605094561","doi":"10.21991/c9x68f","title":"Cooperative Federalism in Search of a Normative Justification: Considering the Principle of Federal Loyalty","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Loyalty; Normative; Political science; Federal law; Law; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Legislation; Politics","score_opus":0.03309826142050176,"score_gpt":0.3159430235126354,"score_spread":0.28284476209213366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1605094561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10846757,0.002091925,0.0697207,0.19818759,0.00043570605,0.00012915295,0.0001391487,0.000102750564,0.6207255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751736,0.00034949524,0.006317027,0.0066497503,0.00016035381,0.00007038502,0.000026967531,0.000023758172,0.01122868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903296,0.003198163,0.0002243271,0.0012843835,0.0026266994,0.0023367195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941603,0.002655229,0.0003314322,0.00066079857,0.0016010142,0.0005912657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0126507,0.00026488738,0.0006676383,0.001534899,0.012637414,0.00843551,0.0022846642,0.007331241,0.0030152733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015997846,0.0002678789,0.00064129324,0.0015959562,0.039389223,0.0072006704,0.0037608033,0.0072171194,0.00026120027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010955158,0.0000011112862,0.000051576557,0.0000015886409,6.772457e-7,0.0000071521745,0.00039381688,0.000057207606,0.000014733084,0.99864763,0.00039593136,0.00042752412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013869054,0.000006251356,0.00046267008,0.000038733702,0.0000061572905,0.000022794093,0.0012342866,0.0010587367,0.00011987172,0.974358,0.022661505,0.00001712317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41494262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.485729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41494262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027604848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039917536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82505476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1607939490","doi":"","title":"Clouding Accountability: Canada’s Government Secrecy and National Security Law 'Complex'","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Accountability; National security; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.014654575758585635,"score_gpt":0.27433378704746203,"score_spread":0.2596792112888764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1607939490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18453018,0.0018453936,0.0037970934,0.38877815,0.0006477582,0.000085193606,0.0005296255,0.00014746706,0.41963914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9522117,0.00040239753,0.0006583606,0.012396844,0.00015627552,0.000016710534,0.000060645496,0.00004551895,0.034051634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903842,0.0014027162,0.0001553951,0.00061057793,0.0029161533,0.0045309546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97541183,0.009597583,0.0016832993,0.0011659022,0.0075543737,0.0045870394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006961824,0.00026065073,0.0004539882,0.0020696053,0.023045529,0.022755269,0.0021042018,0.006994602,0.01706279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0321311,0.00041072047,0.00063309947,0.0030164202,0.01553243,0.006326008,0.005030361,0.009054468,0.00060495094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046859113,0.00003274358,0.009119434,0.000027749391,0.000024510622,0.000191077,0.008176833,0.0008419078,0.00013734058,0.881257,0.08471328,0.015431106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011333844,0.000061104314,0.059961613,0.0002959067,0.00017171484,0.00016734464,0.031838,0.006591869,0.0011613108,0.38828436,0.5110714,0.00028202953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9837022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99110466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8729431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1270569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23190509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92186666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W161306848","doi":"","title":"Are You on the List? Dispelling the Myth of a Total Exemption from the Privacy Act’s Civil Remedies in Shearson v. DHS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Cincinnati law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Mythology; Civil rights; Political science; Business; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.03431844826589081,"score_gpt":0.2524853338504464,"score_spread":0.2181668855845556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W161306848","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04690646,0.008429776,0.0028032488,0.5282087,0.0028371054,0.00018363784,0.00029688972,0.000054671753,0.41027945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5961497,0.004972428,0.001923221,0.3293705,0.0023082846,0.00025516472,0.00012344615,0.000052894153,0.06484437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.982828,0.0075441664,0.001054949,0.0017731261,0.0042410027,0.0025587399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810906,0.013308237,0.0012864886,0.0010883118,0.002132431,0.0010938713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023430133,0.00036423677,0.0006033079,0.0016242763,0.00989625,0.008054723,0.0028328395,0.016866146,0.0046664667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037423044,0.0008475617,0.00057882804,0.0010980315,0.021795949,0.0081193615,0.0063180127,0.016865727,0.0010665399],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020234607,0.000016851178,0.0007677844,0.000077117766,0.0000071432787,0.0004903108,0.0045231143,0.000080587604,0.00013919576,0.9043565,0.081743,0.007778193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007544166,0.00007693755,0.0037340904,0.0011247618,0.000044794364,0.0006116871,0.008083871,0.00046248964,0.00095450366,0.15887076,0.82587624,0.00008445626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09206978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09728311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09206978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008514265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02087559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18306774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1623523886","doi":"","title":"Spilling Secrets: Trade Secret Disclosure and Takings in Offshore Drilling Regulation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Greenfield Research (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Supreme court; Constitution; Eminent domain; Business; Law; Public interest; Trade secret; Government (linguistics); Intellectual property; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.020293980634642796,"score_gpt":0.2559140950623895,"score_spread":0.2356201144277467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1623523886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48236078,0.0050586485,0.035969697,0.040788498,0.00035400758,0.00020244534,0.00009262804,0.000043208853,0.43513015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99211216,0.0008834961,0.0013021822,0.0021920283,0.00012639267,0.000034536606,0.000010170363,0.000005667012,0.0033334016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887017,0.0034830782,0.0007462954,0.00079241727,0.004262578,0.0020138756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977549,0.015930055,0.0035180687,0.0014911321,0.0012689892,0.00024276107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010173234,0.00023978058,0.0003994143,0.001555764,0.004630751,0.00784628,0.0010950227,0.0067564836,0.00239169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022997025,0.00035772606,0.0009558361,0.001233882,0.01611647,0.007820424,0.004758706,0.005861953,0.00017720278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016256896,0.000025031351,0.0013118286,0.000023700608,0.00000574085,0.0002555373,0.0024256327,0.0006060699,0.00028562054,0.9907404,0.00047761924,0.0038264382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055076445,0.00013153417,0.0067445342,0.00060104317,0.00009821183,0.0006141068,0.00866592,0.0050083115,0.0038346185,0.93754,0.03661559,0.00009102629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008399888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007597466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010173234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004587819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068211537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053801835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1636711477","doi":"","title":"The Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters: C.L. Dellums and the Fight for Fair Treatment and Civil Rights by Robert L. Allen (review)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour / Le Travail","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil rights; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.01537093033048888,"score_gpt":0.25979221123217655,"score_spread":0.24442128090168766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1636711477","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000051123207,0.9711368,0.000012140765,0.026682267,0.0015242607,0.0000017563859,0.0000029829216,8.9367313e-7,0.000587851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018939663,0.97785485,0.0000371727,0.016275749,0.002390033,0.00000801682,0.000008990571,0.0000028006855,0.0015284388],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827087,0.0008682598,0.00010421308,0.00018387378,0.0004329955,0.00013968811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996709,0.0020112798,0.00043132022,0.000049742062,0.0005336654,0.000265084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003757596,0.00090854254,0.0013495191,0.0016671766,0.0021024963,0.0042935885,0.0012497546,0.0046638874,0.0033681954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076482655,0.0004463592,0.0005489298,0.002799083,0.00496294,0.004399572,0.0022247243,0.0072717736,0.0010552306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007894116,0.00002572676,0.00033156897,0.0059063365,0.00007596905,0.00013820083,0.000721387,0.000117125,0.00008059962,0.025346143,0.79880244,0.16837558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049152335,0.00003953639,0.0014234805,0.019250449,0.00007710854,0.0004649697,0.0008864148,0.0000435785,0.00008048979,0.010117099,0.9675326,0.000035157216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0214757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04995648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0214757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003477854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011238349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042701423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W168019101","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1110","title":"In the Park: A Jurisprudential Primer","year":2010,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Primer (cosmetics); Law; Political science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.012381302423647869,"score_gpt":0.3160161615382893,"score_spread":0.30363485911464144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W168019101","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010087209,0.023933396,0.048575986,0.27510694,0.002323397,0.00011805386,0.00008707269,0.00008407202,0.63968396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7521976,0.011916672,0.0171149,0.060355607,0.005013287,0.0004978725,0.000104577586,0.0002807764,0.15251864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99520713,0.0027873924,0.00016988297,0.0005733234,0.0006357308,0.00062651286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947108,0.0037122576,0.00025598067,0.00034970162,0.0005779023,0.00039323865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00569572,0.0003643849,0.00071517215,0.0020514806,0.009525994,0.015603132,0.0032421967,0.011324176,0.017139373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009483249,0.0006036035,0.00070095627,0.0022186728,0.0291131,0.018641043,0.006744661,0.0130491145,0.0023460623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014016426,0.000007046507,0.000028677252,0.000008603996,7.015981e-7,0.000017686036,0.0010836992,0.000017028311,0.00000969077,0.994679,0.0029497058,0.0011969134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014051323,0.000015883712,0.00016150693,0.00016887764,0.0000043005184,0.00010283997,0.0034347484,0.00027325883,0.000059434355,0.8056407,0.19011514,0.000009323227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006282687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011945036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017139373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046913824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062056426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057336926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W168443748","doi":"","title":"Defending against Suits Brought by Illegal Aliens","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Wrongful death; Law; Plaintiff; Tort; Misrepresentation; Jury; Doctrine; Lawsuit; Immigration; Political science; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.014371805943596144,"score_gpt":0.2864605411120291,"score_spread":0.27208873516843296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W168443748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22366512,0.0054485663,0.0062476997,0.065235436,0.0013673098,0.00029979693,0.00012317917,0.0003056927,0.69730717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.895235,0.003676925,0.0018743849,0.021273494,0.00089619326,0.00010291283,0.000060885275,0.00002959562,0.07685055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995501,0.00070408935,0.0002658857,0.0005016198,0.0011797436,0.0018477708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959265,0.0022791666,0.00058258005,0.00025624977,0.0005839924,0.0003715418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031217707,0.00065915904,0.00037395032,0.0016605668,0.009698981,0.0069454033,0.002773597,0.014418523,0.0074311085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009254293,0.00033484603,0.00079837535,0.0007338183,0.006848064,0.0018398154,0.0053879195,0.004717187,0.0012922758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116617426,0.00025782618,0.020323236,0.0002691792,0.000099296776,0.02882724,0.030168692,0.003362532,0.0049752495,0.75200737,0.09621595,0.06337683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006945403,0.00046232683,0.021462083,0.002644871,0.0002918182,0.008645413,0.05025551,0.005629478,0.006887697,0.096138924,0.8072962,0.00021613327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031851597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04163978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031851597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00529732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00592112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06333238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W172843058","doi":"","title":"Supreme Court of Canada Rules that 'Private Study' Need Not be Done in 'Splendid Isolation' to Satisfy Fair Dealing Provisions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Agency (philosophy); Fair dealing; Copyright Act; Political science; Fair use; Copyright law; Business; Intellectual property; Sociology; Good faith","score_opus":0.021684638773484092,"score_gpt":0.28685737783063114,"score_spread":0.26517273905714706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W172843058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039585933,0.0018727691,0.009590146,0.16280513,0.0026278566,0.0010648611,0.0045445925,0.0009738154,0.7769349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3080736,0.0014310544,0.010363965,0.19780977,0.00070360757,0.00089285633,0.0013492121,0.00028009672,0.47909585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97364604,0.0014132815,0.0010750284,0.0019521577,0.0137090385,0.008204575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9715028,0.0067326757,0.00064483,0.0017598679,0.016859079,0.0025006828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014487389,0.00078771356,0.0013299399,0.0020484398,0.026376218,0.011935996,0.004893911,0.022184156,0.011403526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035057638,0.0017791594,0.0015674282,0.0032777525,0.009191292,0.0037074818,0.0034038385,0.016959755,0.0034502514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007045018,0.00010237477,0.0025997912,0.000092068985,0.00003270381,0.0003599973,0.0047893263,0.00024217735,0.0008996071,0.6532077,0.32590377,0.011700026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022397298,0.000094327486,0.012116766,0.00041898628,0.00021937571,0.00021585374,0.0037979532,0.001331578,0.0019000121,0.05164692,0.9276861,0.00034816453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95651656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9791413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043483436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04178507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2189739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3031733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1747210889","doi":"10.29173/alr97","title":"Potential for Genetic Discrimination in Access to Insurance: Is There a Dark Side to Increased Availability of Genetic Information?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Underwriting; Genetic discrimination; Actuarial science; Legislature; Medical underwriting; Business; Population; Private information retrieval; Genetic testing; Insurance policy; General insurance; Political science; Law; Medicine; Income protection insurance; Computer security; Computer science; Environmental health","score_opus":0.0182991260174569,"score_gpt":0.3120985351544801,"score_spread":0.2937994091370232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1747210889","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093994394,0.0072368714,0.012453786,0.58195007,0.0007069694,0.00008205205,0.00014512298,0.00009352078,0.30333725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86040837,0.0027684418,0.0040982673,0.11408022,0.0007388734,0.000052700332,0.000047846654,0.000030553423,0.017774774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97275996,0.007872842,0.0007688033,0.002018786,0.012280546,0.0042990902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9416128,0.040798083,0.004025549,0.0033533897,0.007878749,0.002331354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027566249,0.00022145968,0.00068522024,0.0020247137,0.007673372,0.009511375,0.003211445,0.014983897,0.0046924464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053063896,0.00061980763,0.00073637307,0.0013921559,0.03459874,0.005881615,0.0052398853,0.011185053,0.00045215507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018638946,0.00003213336,0.0077641443,0.000046285233,0.000017126584,0.0009357425,0.0064815115,0.00021154046,0.0004535956,0.9523881,0.01190086,0.01975034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014069457,0.00012736516,0.02534825,0.0017347947,0.00015109417,0.0029506532,0.0139012905,0.0019432633,0.001894598,0.62866014,0.32288134,0.00026654822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22840089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2619732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7715991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0145997405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033333845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45414287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1749212531","doi":"","title":"Stories of 0s: Transgender Women, Monstrous Bodies, and the Canadian Prison System","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Transgender; Jurisprudence; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Context (archaeology); Political science; Criminal law; Gender studies; History","score_opus":0.029952102075931845,"score_gpt":0.29853962858674,"score_spread":0.26858752651080814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1749212531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6237186,0.014370419,0.001055142,0.16659757,0.0017097289,0.00009908395,0.000510614,0.00010701561,0.19183184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970177,0.0034815806,0.0002648084,0.007915009,0.00011720537,0.000027689406,0.00006080192,0.000050095925,0.01790591],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939632,0.0019857336,0.000074757074,0.00035223877,0.0012544575,0.0023696506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996114,0.0010163985,0.00026559667,0.00012720336,0.00096249126,0.0015142683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032363278,0.001098741,0.00064040977,0.0025784308,0.072662115,0.011368723,0.0036894719,0.0051259706,0.005171655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007048577,0.0006750295,0.0005493642,0.002805524,0.045957156,0.0057243514,0.0092195915,0.008587572,0.000387051],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003194277,0.000015254286,0.0023175175,0.0000588313,0.00000738312,0.0013182546,0.9375557,0.00007587576,0.00020527936,0.028630575,0.023740863,0.006042424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038608437,0.000015339454,0.0028347399,0.00016450154,0.000012956433,0.00042088825,0.87413466,0.000077776866,0.00010953234,0.0016494131,0.12052213,0.000054133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98051924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99084735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12072213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12072213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07400392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87590444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1752244394","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1109","title":"Whose Best Interests?: Custody and Access Law and Procedure","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Best interests; Premise; Law; Child custody; Contradiction; Political science; Normative; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0232905646197808,"score_gpt":0.3312614555548316,"score_spread":0.3079708909350508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1752244394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045970134,0.025743635,0.045193266,0.14432889,0.0007159092,0.00009043849,0.000074180636,0.000059110098,0.73782444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94846684,0.0055376254,0.0062126555,0.015607098,0.00091617095,0.00015228128,0.0000329878,0.000062529674,0.023011733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98221886,0.010235227,0.00059584033,0.0015094873,0.0035591556,0.0018814066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898224,0.0075256117,0.000801751,0.0005057844,0.00078498956,0.00055939914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013774782,0.00037980435,0.00063182734,0.0018740249,0.0075054932,0.015811987,0.0020973843,0.010023095,0.006326913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024422044,0.00046081716,0.0006432088,0.0020005428,0.051168814,0.018105468,0.007326384,0.008357541,0.000854633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026443352,0.0000039033584,0.0001049058,0.000005709395,0.0000011566907,0.000046228175,0.0011432314,0.000023230583,0.00001911364,0.9966917,0.0005723665,0.001385836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014509551,0.000022012879,0.00048491423,0.00021772602,0.000008624923,0.00023733676,0.0029487154,0.00023298568,0.0001322004,0.9538035,0.041881487,0.000016021797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009853172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063257287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015811987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006760565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009354379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07284886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1768518597","doi":"","title":"Out in the Cold: Schreyer v Schreyer ’s Call for Law Reform","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.0373655364487764,"score_gpt":0.3053320849986185,"score_spread":0.26796654854984214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1768518597","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034034522,0.0010557242,0.0011138855,0.97036046,0.0026735663,0.00002066706,0.000027158307,0.000023304996,0.021321869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14756067,0.0006499783,0.0014321461,0.83054614,0.006142335,0.00007402501,0.000028289423,0.000070553964,0.0134958085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831808,0.006605511,0.0006300093,0.002453439,0.0032666721,0.0038635316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794686,0.013663115,0.0012144804,0.0013404558,0.002545789,0.0017676216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022439651,0.00048818442,0.0012902472,0.0013741369,0.010464315,0.010009979,0.0037959698,0.059255883,0.009430399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09109104,0.000562826,0.0012459626,0.00086228765,0.03004753,0.01737398,0.007614829,0.05043832,0.0014597102],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058629503,0.000048118844,0.00036297512,0.00004643477,0.00002082667,0.00023092046,0.0027563965,0.00016082672,0.00016183169,0.7125477,0.2758553,0.0077499296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001583892,0.000035759775,0.00091421173,0.00036399526,0.000048940365,0.00013922532,0.0032266483,0.00052855164,0.00041263536,0.6948278,0.29925308,0.00009068771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028611863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042321123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059255883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007212687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018274428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11867362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W179309874","doi":"10.58948/2331-3528.1800","title":"Inconsistent Responsiveness Determination in Document Review: Difference of Opinion or Human Error?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pace law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Computer science; Human error; Quality (philosophy); Information retrieval; Psychology; Data science; Risk analysis (engineering); Epistemology; Medicine","score_opus":0.07820519774678054,"score_gpt":0.41734571862699993,"score_spread":0.3391405208802194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W179309874","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28529832,0.025005326,0.5055553,0.091187246,0.005886963,0.0039118156,0.0007928489,0.0014578467,0.08090447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87986994,0.0024511463,0.09566595,0.0145139275,0.0018892632,0.0015106712,0.00027119502,0.0003368093,0.0034910813],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.29019824,0.49970526,0.04806607,0.027032802,0.13073178,0.0042658933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.09446057,0.7707266,0.052315623,0.032212134,0.04900026,0.001284745],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4621453,0.0008368607,0.0024810266,0.009135067,0.0032997832,0.008428406,0.00396021,0.0040357215,0.0023954532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.76782674,0.0011107341,0.0017124605,0.0060680043,0.009740588,0.0103317555,0.005931162,0.0042028404,0.0009584726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013005206,0.00042014883,0.089383736,0.0058784657,0.003553636,0.0017872365,0.095685914,0.0066473177,0.007534902,0.16122459,0.034240417,0.5923431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013658454,0.0021874066,0.18050456,0.009551043,0.0027750768,0.0038990278,0.03342911,0.043339927,0.035540238,0.45634824,0.22923173,0.0018278742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002914336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003410049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5378547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008522191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007858316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6632706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W181195231","doi":"","title":"Joint Reform?: The Interplay of State, Federal, and Hemispheric Regulation of Recreational Marijuana and the Failed War on Drugs","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decriminalization; Legalization; State (computer science); Political science; Recreational use; Recreational Drug; Recreation; Joint (building); Criminology; Law; Medicine; Psychology; Psychiatry; Drug; Engineering","score_opus":0.008596425557281904,"score_gpt":0.24906123677223596,"score_spread":0.24046481121495406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W181195231","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18919136,0.011431533,0.008364538,0.34502366,0.0011106328,0.000105977015,0.00012544531,0.00009515223,0.44455177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96632284,0.001448313,0.0007706672,0.02236312,0.00042494078,0.000064049964,0.000026783113,0.000025283172,0.008553852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99135476,0.003797383,0.0001708841,0.0011166797,0.0010088295,0.0025515573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99509263,0.0021086137,0.00082426117,0.00050762034,0.0006638453,0.00080303836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068944586,0.00020586957,0.0004830219,0.0008631969,0.010361676,0.014671751,0.0013336652,0.0065402193,0.005825657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009913403,0.000386523,0.0006368804,0.0011991622,0.024335667,0.008039567,0.0074425554,0.007878421,0.00036911777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022296193,0.000044394164,0.0013823995,0.00003175693,0.000019106588,0.00009517974,0.0071014445,0.00029371772,0.00024626023,0.97570974,0.0068323603,0.008221416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013171778,0.0001489525,0.023347942,0.0005684107,0.00019790328,0.00019095243,0.027527062,0.0017228335,0.0014326542,0.5007174,0.4438882,0.00012590698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051313058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059410565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051313058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014417575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016796125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104607284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1831315329","doi":"","title":"'Constitution Chicken': National Security Confidentiality and Terrorism Prosecutions after R. v. Ahmad","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Constitution; Jury; Confidentiality; Legislation; Parliament; Constitutional right; Terrorism; Trial court; National security; Politics","score_opus":0.010331544651187597,"score_gpt":0.29328166733078564,"score_spread":0.28295012267959807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1831315329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.437416,0.008291374,0.0033218444,0.16473767,0.0018664412,0.0001929697,0.00019764336,0.000053408716,0.3839227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9364921,0.0010670155,0.00081997435,0.029092005,0.00026638154,0.000039876926,0.000041295236,0.00001843821,0.032162905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893112,0.002212172,0.00030154918,0.0009336879,0.0032355075,0.004005856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915569,0.0056328,0.00062626664,0.00036221347,0.0010898426,0.0007319733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010144126,0.00023183269,0.0005510952,0.001109223,0.02538019,0.008498564,0.002147743,0.014610884,0.002701374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021574916,0.00052401086,0.00064086216,0.0011896193,0.015492771,0.0032329487,0.0049115755,0.0176363,0.00029211465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006538312,0.000044584183,0.0032938528,0.000044087632,0.000016997199,0.0030450784,0.029808294,0.0003273632,0.00092428253,0.9337716,0.020419842,0.008238619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002615926,0.00045659882,0.051879477,0.0010070738,0.00024313867,0.0025015841,0.096753106,0.0023990758,0.008114449,0.21239933,0.6235378,0.00044685343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5939699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7042841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5939699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02522839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04648818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8168426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W183155047","doi":"","title":"Legal aspects of carbon trading : Kyoto, Copenhagen, and beyond","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kyoto Protocol; Emissions trading; Carbon offset; Carbon market; Carbon fibers; International trade; Greenhouse gas; Political science; International economics; Business; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03198017485561127,"score_gpt":0.3339041531463252,"score_spread":0.30192397829071393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W183155047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003790221,0.25749412,0.0033067977,0.12840472,0.023425713,0.000043090593,0.00024947227,0.00012443257,0.58316153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20128866,0.25835556,0.0061615137,0.06809622,0.023651939,0.00018248486,0.00048074435,0.00046419087,0.44131875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961838,0.0007034464,0.0002688419,0.00036976088,0.0020148244,0.00045932297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981223,0.0011193686,0.00015602114,0.0001452558,0.0003029228,0.00015421108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033087928,0.00057302264,0.00047482934,0.0013018617,0.0027918252,0.014143967,0.0011629355,0.006326217,0.00515352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007749026,0.00051442604,0.0003811729,0.0022121356,0.0064687068,0.010442345,0.002121313,0.0065480126,0.0017188567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029669696,0.000018563493,0.00015874224,0.00021154038,0.0000051354114,0.00011065033,0.002014472,0.00037986174,0.00023865874,0.73397934,0.2197457,0.043107674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002978175,0.000005349617,0.00038066506,0.00032173662,0.0000036366102,0.000043785374,0.0006542897,0.000082128354,0.00011419848,0.0734346,0.92493826,0.000018452809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019239211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025101542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019239211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061774524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0101236245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044820786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1854733578","doi":"","title":"Fathers Not Shortchanged by Current Adoption Legislation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Notice; Supreme court; Law; Best interests; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05667251494718964,"score_gpt":0.34153147649777804,"score_spread":0.28485896155058843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1854733578","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008917882,0.04280672,0.004126823,0.57326204,0.09679458,0.00010600129,0.00019285925,0.00047004514,0.273323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.088418745,0.022278314,0.003793365,0.66494614,0.027010417,0.00017379527,0.00027048765,0.00037684798,0.19273195],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97761744,0.004887469,0.0018875623,0.0026661272,0.011168718,0.0017726613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9742433,0.0145281805,0.0023553513,0.0021643045,0.004984411,0.0017244524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01463547,0.00025337515,0.0005621018,0.0006306127,0.004714378,0.0070804637,0.0017050593,0.010508678,0.009770695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049923025,0.0005959609,0.00060362596,0.0006468062,0.0070971907,0.004860138,0.003549538,0.016339837,0.0032651718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044729175,0.000049396553,0.0011670919,0.00056783285,0.000014889428,0.0010810844,0.0106742,0.00006271248,0.0014487162,0.309138,0.5943165,0.08143492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004062153,0.000011983912,0.0004212823,0.00048704134,0.0000057103252,0.00014057838,0.00047360267,0.000015347976,0.00020382415,0.003246947,0.9949792,0.0000104056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019835413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03770417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019835413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050155595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01498808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077400684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1855830533","doi":"","title":"Dispute over autism treatment heads to top court","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Europe PMC (PubMed Central)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Charter; Supreme court; Law; High Court; Political science; Remand (court procedure); Law of the case; Autism; Medicine; Court of record; Original jurisdiction; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.020576504590816717,"score_gpt":0.2668612368897832,"score_spread":0.24628473229896647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1855830533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06960026,0.002461147,0.0036036407,0.2707781,0.00371598,0.00026902443,0.0006109415,0.00023892616,0.64872193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5715092,0.0013905377,0.002804001,0.19560672,0.0014213476,0.00018952448,0.00031141963,0.00014527231,0.22662194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.981457,0.0019951242,0.00063053216,0.0017068464,0.0077125705,0.0064979466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98597276,0.00473964,0.00032117433,0.000496696,0.006209177,0.0022605574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009478149,0.00038549927,0.0009066327,0.0020498985,0.03736527,0.011172778,0.004015513,0.016702902,0.013493248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03627584,0.00077475584,0.00092965236,0.0015774852,0.0073544784,0.002563331,0.006843619,0.02014866,0.0015445793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006935404,0.00007452349,0.003713473,0.00007082047,0.000059904727,0.0036486336,0.012900097,0.00047458752,0.0011897916,0.6089605,0.33740515,0.031433187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014435993,0.0000695502,0.010720679,0.00078651373,0.00022615647,0.0011806603,0.015618418,0.0021390328,0.0022244637,0.13488942,0.8317881,0.00021270245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70607805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83329034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70607805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040616073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10514111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5913058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1864625425","doi":"","title":"The Constitutionality of Decolonization by Associated Statehood: Puerto Rico's Legal Status Reconsidered","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Political science; Constitutional law; Constitutionality; International law; Originalism; Treaty; Municipal law","score_opus":0.017918148097918234,"score_gpt":0.3145785384309697,"score_spread":0.29666039033305147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1864625425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4498767,0.0035568585,0.00578546,0.040973887,0.00022737824,0.0001429755,0.0002203004,0.00006783144,0.49914858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800498,0.0006058644,0.00071790087,0.002241614,0.000052434763,0.000075567295,0.000024473378,0.000018328281,0.016213989],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839383,0.0006340275,0.00006329578,0.00030407397,0.00015787731,0.00044682683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988348,0.00052474474,0.0001348565,0.00026618474,0.00017019405,0.00006924705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037459652,0.00019277226,0.00032221925,0.00052792806,0.0069826064,0.0063850195,0.0014873226,0.0027457294,0.0030887271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038183897,0.00026453403,0.00032152113,0.00074766023,0.011512029,0.0036056838,0.004326781,0.0040580286,0.00016104734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019090867,0.0000050067474,0.0009700401,0.00002003438,0.0000052380265,0.00026622048,0.011100743,0.0001881043,0.0005934777,0.9801405,0.0012374186,0.0054541244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010261699,0.00012870981,0.018396815,0.00055385684,0.00022287873,0.0005693004,0.058742475,0.0032944544,0.005747677,0.36654428,0.5454493,0.0002476238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19991322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18919651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19991322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008702022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007622422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39749914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1867839040","doi":"","title":"The Preservation Obligation: Regulating and Sanctioning Pre-Litigation Spoliation in Federal Court","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Sanctions; Law; Obligation; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Political science; Summary judgment; Pension; Misconduct; Civil procedure; Supreme court","score_opus":0.0541456604935297,"score_gpt":0.32113545725217446,"score_spread":0.26698979675864476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1867839040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34336802,0.005162111,0.083165176,0.089091726,0.0006825147,0.0005546879,0.0001764526,0.00074998144,0.47704932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791326,0.0004525738,0.0052947756,0.0067874966,0.00036551285,0.00011539981,0.000035429744,0.000043518736,0.0077727097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96050864,0.010930015,0.0029011164,0.0045404173,0.01162595,0.009493861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95464677,0.02603339,0.004878351,0.0065406053,0.006062938,0.0018378678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029500576,0.0003645979,0.0006212519,0.0030088883,0.01439929,0.01920536,0.0042840242,0.015842112,0.0023317037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052054904,0.0010317803,0.00082398107,0.0022855557,0.01859277,0.011378475,0.007330422,0.009008199,0.0006191066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004185564,0.00008654843,0.005341801,0.000047649264,0.000024070676,0.0006476549,0.0066791107,0.0010858225,0.001257167,0.94531363,0.010466242,0.029008573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001529024,0.0005387631,0.03474587,0.0014832133,0.0003595989,0.0015013282,0.011645166,0.01428362,0.013293034,0.722559,0.19888514,0.00055236364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047109943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.067861274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047109943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014616706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0258315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15601581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1868157597","doi":"","title":"A Life of H. L. A. Hart: The Nightmare and the Noble Dream","year":2004,"lang":"ceb","type":"book","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dream; Aside; Biography; Law; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; History; Political science; Art; Literature; Psychology","score_opus":0.021763474336079617,"score_gpt":0.28486191129631,"score_spread":0.2630984369602304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1868157597","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004395722,0.1020142,0.0010900229,0.8234626,0.016417924,0.000013291722,0.00006972698,0.00006298538,0.052473504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29318437,0.08808693,0.0021777048,0.27924725,0.019730015,0.000070338916,0.000100443365,0.00029310677,0.31710982],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777514,0.001329506,0.000042631247,0.00016741965,0.00045025835,0.00023514478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970771,0.0010729881,0.00018604449,0.00018723722,0.00054143247,0.0009351948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022755316,0.00040742083,0.0003846076,0.0005281553,0.01050432,0.008009281,0.0008539391,0.0035728815,0.008393183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050881025,0.00038538902,0.00022235466,0.0007769002,0.012459266,0.006571368,0.0029885548,0.009699541,0.0024043038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022204675,0.000031927077,0.0002781349,0.000060865103,0.000004635849,0.00014653186,0.013652423,0.00003095579,0.000111283414,0.09492286,0.8621554,0.028582875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003967,0.000014307992,0.00040615626,0.00014313146,0.0000015621131,0.0001536744,0.012078745,0.000030146337,0.00005967825,0.014463563,0.97263014,0.000015014867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02397406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038933095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02397406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049580135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057612653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047669053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1873752839","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4502","title":"Politics and Policy Change in American Administrative Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Agency (philosophy); Politics; Law; Political science; Arbitrariness; Abandonment (legal); Law and economics; Administrative law; Position (finance); Sociology; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.07245255672048595,"score_gpt":0.4187299525912302,"score_spread":0.34627739587074424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1873752839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043525077,0.017521108,0.0036612542,0.23221849,0.0013042812,0.00003776536,0.000052903448,0.000060470204,0.7016187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90708864,0.0070356796,0.0013343481,0.030668786,0.0012350247,0.00008440702,0.00003846169,0.00003626356,0.052478332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931965,0.0029012044,0.00015178992,0.0006180087,0.0016176448,0.0015148977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970294,0.0017618267,0.0003005526,0.00019699862,0.0003496229,0.00036144233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051119467,0.00024336367,0.00026227807,0.0017656822,0.015076954,0.014375132,0.001035143,0.006577737,0.0050538112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007913871,0.00036761162,0.00040422016,0.003272099,0.029175712,0.0063242754,0.0038560778,0.00803927,0.00050962623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019016799,0.000012907974,0.00016694023,0.0000073076467,0.0000013988729,0.000018929139,0.0010610725,0.00016376503,0.000022706565,0.9907584,0.004763985,0.003020726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012619121,0.000011707175,0.002138464,0.00009977345,0.0000068552854,0.000027486936,0.0027031596,0.00064183265,0.00011928162,0.6890541,0.3051608,0.000023761366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062659025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.074387185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062659025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028632225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022566266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20774227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1876411196","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/6tjr9","title":"Decentralizing Family: An Inclusive Proposal for Individual Tax Filing in the United States","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interdependence; Sketch; Law and economics; Income tax; Political science; Tax reform; Law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.047030240200316646,"score_gpt":0.3653939792759077,"score_spread":0.31836373907559107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1876411196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09288009,0.003469188,0.025628459,0.087402895,0.0014236623,0.0009028716,0.00035621406,0.00041305125,0.7875235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76837367,0.0018795957,0.017637834,0.04125026,0.00077554816,0.00083956606,0.00015997488,0.00009916313,0.16898441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99328095,0.0017917024,0.00039007503,0.0008539036,0.0017415563,0.0019418444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977982,0.0008661058,0.00010880315,0.00025250754,0.00067599915,0.0002984425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072923563,0.00037010564,0.00035264547,0.0014496627,0.014309113,0.0065954244,0.0023145273,0.011529579,0.0058368086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069415728,0.00067192083,0.0009673753,0.0011556355,0.008106937,0.0035224927,0.0057936837,0.009447707,0.00070314744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000128150305,0.000053623557,0.0011143076,0.00001799698,0.000005913808,0.0002184202,0.003413252,0.0004660582,0.00014377518,0.9672764,0.019906988,0.0073705297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016135577,0.00019085096,0.00954491,0.0005485905,0.0001400861,0.0007806739,0.007995941,0.007407251,0.0013693173,0.22422905,0.74735254,0.00027940117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3846616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014379822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025202155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56419677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1888161112","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1257","title":"The Day the Dialogue Died: A Comment on Sauve v. Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Political science; Law; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.016729205297561806,"score_gpt":0.2717723883430372,"score_spread":0.25504318304547535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1888161112","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018279888,0.007899996,0.0005140316,0.8980596,0.004905485,0.00003949527,0.00033309552,0.00006929295,0.06989914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21804556,0.0032328472,0.00047445923,0.7124509,0.0019811639,0.00006847823,0.0001403317,0.00015994013,0.06344628],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898637,0.0016430225,0.00020137521,0.0008931856,0.0030687624,0.004329956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99276805,0.0038876052,0.00024109115,0.00012987274,0.0019190398,0.0010544155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005783503,0.0009664421,0.00096874073,0.0014005883,0.08099222,0.014249446,0.0060160607,0.04036314,0.0047116205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015710335,0.0009867408,0.0015967869,0.002464004,0.01941854,0.0043610567,0.0039202143,0.03903982,0.0006315822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013711357,0.000024257577,0.0012914693,0.00014203826,0.00003225828,0.0027440924,0.080385596,0.0003123836,0.0006175724,0.19001277,0.71766615,0.0066342438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065949025,0.00002541953,0.0036522793,0.00046967846,0.00007510736,0.0004180069,0.074514486,0.0004687699,0.0010029789,0.016948985,0.90211743,0.0002408869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97684664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9860204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10743038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10743038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12802994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7794656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1895800542","doi":"","title":"The Appropriate Role of the Courts in Interpreting the GST Legislation: Reflections on the Canadian Experience","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.021609594344825855,"score_gpt":0.3032304733417238,"score_spread":0.28162087899689797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1895800542","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12871821,0.007984016,0.0038120938,0.5711773,0.0014030605,0.0001233458,0.00025766293,0.000068639776,0.2864557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8919383,0.005287629,0.0030796616,0.049949948,0.0003504159,0.000053843643,0.00006212266,0.00016018626,0.049117837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.968199,0.009918456,0.00093904475,0.0020103462,0.008512917,0.010420277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9542658,0.022905609,0.0011848317,0.00072412426,0.01546722,0.005452466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029429844,0.00065225246,0.00087124243,0.0037471417,0.06400508,0.024118258,0.0049061547,0.01580993,0.010930494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04933718,0.0010705211,0.0010457822,0.0062735933,0.04856855,0.006689536,0.0075145736,0.023539314,0.0005836675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074802345,0.00006086801,0.0038759804,0.00020272529,0.00002496863,0.0015737818,0.24323343,0.00084226794,0.000756246,0.67064744,0.05404874,0.024658795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007334644,0.0000387042,0.012276932,0.0006478535,0.000073067386,0.00048939354,0.30782625,0.001049875,0.001053541,0.04491377,0.631225,0.00033233996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99556667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.264382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.264382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33903491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8532126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W190042589","doi":"","title":"Paul T. Takagi Honored","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice A Journal of Crime Conflict & World Order","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ceremony; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.053824508817645424,"score_gpt":0.3422315353053557,"score_spread":0.28840702648771027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W190042589","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002985231,0.024375886,0.0010402641,0.20055239,0.24634485,0.00020509533,0.0010263422,0.0004306063,0.52303934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006153559,0.0061263633,0.00025921638,0.014259606,0.008349125,0.00005071777,0.00025853916,0.00012057829,0.9644224],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980578,0.00014359973,0.00005277874,0.0002856791,0.00097251625,0.00048752083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99560297,0.00009517628,0.0000858544,0.000092608534,0.0013729836,0.0027505432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015822238,0.0007642647,0.00061333366,0.0013216108,0.0063744974,0.005410922,0.00092567847,0.0021690931,0.16674969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046803453,0.0003356311,0.0005160118,0.0007258958,0.00081865443,0.0019098006,0.004539287,0.0059267106,0.06545388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007637577,0.000009874508,0.00015711883,0.000019824618,0.0000011126464,0.000054417163,0.000078825804,0.0000055933797,0.00005450754,0.0013670934,0.9773146,0.020929314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001382213,0.000008997367,0.00023759555,0.000036402176,0.0000012227139,0.00009955527,0.00013333088,0.000009984207,0.000036207734,0.00017139809,0.9992607,0.0000031358395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01339254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03919113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16674969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038645712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009218965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5578333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1914405500","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: The Law of Canada: Statutes and Regulations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.11203312431465048,"score_gpt":0.39313218609290285,"score_spread":0.2810990617782524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1914405500","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033511294,0.03128362,0.0026310515,0.048594933,0.0030019942,0.0012359712,0.16066702,0.0015014588,0.7477328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01849982,0.022585386,0.0059277792,0.006592794,0.0005951695,0.0009082386,0.02580019,0.00063607976,0.9184545],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99474597,0.00047715727,0.000367509,0.00042228404,0.0033008675,0.00068628264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97365487,0.0048366184,0.0006190549,0.0006706695,0.019055769,0.0011629125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043944595,0.0013352272,0.0013114648,0.012258111,0.010445264,0.012888596,0.0031773823,0.007280536,0.14909571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020567192,0.001403592,0.0008058843,0.03256421,0.003287619,0.0042578527,0.0014487642,0.00491116,0.019729944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009799603,0.000026188032,0.00045828352,0.0002549392,0.0000040421587,0.000021831394,0.0004957507,0.00019344597,0.000029234956,0.028039875,0.94834626,0.022120375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019546804,0.0000088196475,0.0061308015,0.0008714972,0.00001846849,0.000018670768,0.0014427205,0.00024200199,0.00012774288,0.0064198677,0.9846526,0.00004733835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99014145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14909571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09995604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35061336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7252352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1926460403","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.31553","title":"IN THE MATTER OF THE FEMALE MIND: AN ANALYSIS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA’S APPROACH TO WOMEN AND MENTAL HEALTH","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Mental health; Law; Psychology; Political science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.03688513608631631,"score_gpt":0.33467628247499454,"score_spread":0.2977911463886782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1926460403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23831297,0.013430114,0.0025627334,0.1578751,0.0008941785,0.0001779517,0.00042058245,0.00003571039,0.5862906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9288956,0.0029172907,0.00072706013,0.025210306,0.00017794993,0.000057859004,0.00008251546,0.00004639676,0.04188504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884797,0.001955525,0.00013804458,0.00069630845,0.0035041033,0.005226501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99515706,0.0019268369,0.00021108457,0.00010761792,0.0015991613,0.0009982637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004797958,0.00061606726,0.00065031426,0.0036294593,0.059777785,0.015162259,0.0031272438,0.0075555462,0.0050191754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0099549275,0.00048470998,0.00079643016,0.004487703,0.035483703,0.0030540745,0.005159966,0.009611599,0.00025299808],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019983112,0.000023582961,0.0029946226,0.000051173647,0.000015447216,0.0011926591,0.115665995,0.0003111718,0.00027922215,0.8475982,0.02438288,0.0074650077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053339096,0.00004224181,0.028288025,0.0010150321,0.00013983862,0.00053731404,0.27972656,0.0016204163,0.0008244223,0.11796237,0.5695604,0.00023005065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99204344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2011718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2011718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22563477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9265275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1939758794","doi":"10.29173/alr295","title":"Litigating Shut-in for Lack of a Market: A Comment on Stewart Estate v. TAQA North Ltd.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Lease; Shut down; Freehold; Natural gas; Estate; Business; Payment; Expansive; Finance; Real estate; Commerce; Economics; Engineering; Law; Waste management; Political science","score_opus":0.09980463436795538,"score_gpt":0.3757299032898299,"score_spread":0.2759252689218745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1939758794","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018513333,0.004461808,0.0025790366,0.8053709,0.0052140844,0.0001761665,0.00064735085,0.00023895936,0.16279842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09873444,0.0015963628,0.001308463,0.8235798,0.0027808568,0.00021051672,0.00016942584,0.00013832697,0.07148185],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98642945,0.002192041,0.00081319903,0.0019682355,0.0045765988,0.0040206034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97235334,0.02004316,0.00080736045,0.0007892742,0.0038489213,0.0021580004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016301261,0.0012195674,0.0017845298,0.0011323505,0.019111492,0.011305106,0.011286983,0.108364716,0.009366994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039819375,0.0028603885,0.003346396,0.0013620231,0.011680876,0.0080955215,0.0054724636,0.06130203,0.0034165338],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013447859,0.000080272344,0.0021482506,0.00017789305,0.00007121189,0.0026463314,0.007118322,0.00029079872,0.0010049889,0.25308728,0.7276722,0.005567929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003977013,0.00022863015,0.009102232,0.0015463349,0.00045937032,0.0017455538,0.013255263,0.0018053814,0.0026700925,0.07170659,0.896625,0.00045800774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26695558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5672583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7330444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01342797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037415788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53080344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1941005615","doi":"","title":"INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LITIGATION IN THE UNITED STATES AND CANADIAN COURTS","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"공법학연구","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personal jurisdiction; Alien Tort Statute; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Charter; Sovereign immunity; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Tort; Torture; Human rights; Sovereignty; Original jurisdiction; Supreme court; Liability; Politics","score_opus":0.016550471507339817,"score_gpt":0.2948294795397938,"score_spread":0.27827900803245403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1941005615","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062131427,0.010665317,0.00088380266,0.06956935,0.0015565077,0.0001705385,0.00072991505,0.00007409738,0.85421914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7667251,0.010117683,0.0015107202,0.03684234,0.000514031,0.00015454099,0.0006234443,0.00008613371,0.18342584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9746395,0.0018813189,0.0007048988,0.002136925,0.008360712,0.0122766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986699,0.0035200925,0.00061887025,0.0005091609,0.006260384,0.0023924934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009690829,0.00096409,0.00082444603,0.006181722,0.043119654,0.030473849,0.003289721,0.0120344935,0.013835306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02667415,0.00089830736,0.0015815663,0.01026932,0.0150606055,0.006007239,0.006510275,0.010946689,0.00093583734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009621567,0.000078429475,0.0041000806,0.000106342515,0.000042839052,0.00067169336,0.011012913,0.00069942576,0.00022263166,0.8337382,0.12600105,0.023230111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014390911,0.00007205766,0.020664295,0.0012907787,0.00023836484,0.00038617628,0.046780895,0.0022146155,0.0012342947,0.047232963,0.8794053,0.00033633155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.990777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9944338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2302125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2302125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3258441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8928444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1946532422","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpv110","title":"Sweet success: ‘Valentine Secret’ not confusing with ‘Victoria's Secret’, rules Federal Court of Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Trade secret; Federal court; Law; Political science; Advertising; Business; Intellectual property; Supreme court","score_opus":0.03821629386603757,"score_gpt":0.289577209192768,"score_spread":0.25136091532673044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1946532422","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036324736,0.0053954767,0.0036302852,0.56680876,0.0028651145,0.00006955727,0.0001739422,0.00009453557,0.3846376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5447011,0.0012589721,0.0020139914,0.326299,0.0004979642,0.000051614992,0.00006878498,0.00011711984,0.124991484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869991,0.0027184514,0.00041627503,0.0014157279,0.0049723415,0.0034781396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902261,0.004425864,0.0004309816,0.0005230447,0.0028852362,0.0015088051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009965159,0.00038904307,0.0006695725,0.00092200533,0.03121562,0.014923765,0.002363723,0.016038844,0.0049997815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032879923,0.0006183379,0.00057485054,0.0013306165,0.022543486,0.0067231865,0.005120283,0.01878567,0.0006850359],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026647194,0.000015437707,0.0010823236,0.000040003397,0.000018539406,0.0003583883,0.019068325,0.00009966425,0.00027213257,0.78374493,0.18769486,0.0075787315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003283934,0.00003032104,0.0035819504,0.00043052062,0.000049416114,0.00032911217,0.026193582,0.0005293197,0.0007956031,0.124717385,0.84310955,0.00020037324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7871851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9089787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21281493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024049675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06492881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42813647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W194656709","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Legal Perspective on Challenging Enforcement of the $18.2 Billion Ecuadorian Judgment against Chevron - Part I: Contesting the Jurisdiction of the Ontario Superior Court","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TDM","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chevron (anatomy); Jurisdiction; Perspective (graphical); Enforcement; Political science; Law; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.03385950939696475,"score_gpt":0.2776266211246042,"score_spread":0.24376711172763943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W194656709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.094663374,0.0068690395,0.0016662448,0.27279714,0.0005409549,0.00017136207,0.000565582,0.00003896795,0.6226873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8766354,0.0036010675,0.0020379904,0.025493834,0.00023427914,0.00009559809,0.000098741875,0.00003872803,0.09176437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896778,0.0013209564,0.00022621,0.0007950065,0.0029184942,0.0050615994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914698,0.0023654427,0.00042645607,0.0002979671,0.0043019284,0.0011383301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060711973,0.00052066986,0.00053878536,0.00302423,0.032024954,0.014428595,0.0031034285,0.009173886,0.01235886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018932573,0.0005216746,0.000670763,0.0033177873,0.015762227,0.0038345903,0.0036360247,0.007729293,0.0004624043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056012737,0.000023685687,0.003550428,0.0000754263,0.000031217944,0.0005285934,0.012262277,0.00088479137,0.00041746526,0.91088986,0.060765725,0.010514561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014229004,0.000057705252,0.037023988,0.000852497,0.00022224274,0.00033175616,0.08172865,0.0036732447,0.001365147,0.15496103,0.71922696,0.0004144973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99563247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99785703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20115264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20115264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23000146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92654973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1950996903","doi":"","title":"A CRITIQUE OF THE BRITISH COLUMBIA RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE BROKERAGE INDUSTRY’S USE OF DUAL AGENCY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Real estate; Agency (philosophy); Dual (grammatical number); Business; Estate; Real estate development; Finance; Public relations; Public administration; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05093970985968707,"score_gpt":0.3211113976777358,"score_spread":0.2701716878180487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1950996903","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016325498,0.072750896,0.0020585614,0.61172265,0.0017438431,0.00004830695,0.0002252014,0.0000903681,0.29503474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56082815,0.045468442,0.0030659358,0.26731917,0.001436849,0.00015595474,0.0001587087,0.00014400968,0.121422805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98485816,0.0033582677,0.00043632224,0.0019435096,0.007677078,0.00172679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98159766,0.007716283,0.0007539836,0.0006742012,0.008211706,0.0010462259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00869444,0.00035711413,0.00066214503,0.0038979778,0.020591762,0.015179865,0.0041356822,0.011445191,0.0050896816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015392057,0.0007230913,0.00054435874,0.0058389087,0.031354874,0.0040993863,0.0025820325,0.017436186,0.0011590061],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001454759,0.000017426784,0.000984635,0.00018475161,0.000015679223,0.0002259511,0.008988782,0.00025870695,0.00019070951,0.7336273,0.230392,0.025099482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028827548,0.000014597155,0.0067108376,0.0010382225,0.00003296108,0.00016504826,0.00710311,0.00044550878,0.000261256,0.04754851,0.93657005,0.000081124665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94796634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.962472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076795235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.076795235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11118616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.557191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W195506792","doi":"","title":"Canada’s Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act and Secret Commissions Offense","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American University international law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; Ratification; Legislation; Language change; Enforcement; Convention; Law; Political science; Business; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.02130956694984576,"score_gpt":0.27143593421231443,"score_spread":0.2501263672624687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W195506792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027870173,0.026042102,0.00083298254,0.09540306,0.0028706437,0.00016579387,0.0064267893,0.00019543174,0.84019303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5166284,0.026485728,0.0015856334,0.03193344,0.0009775468,0.000111314395,0.0035382628,0.00010718955,0.41863242],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910806,0.00030656726,0.00015578922,0.00031104774,0.0061530746,0.001992987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99269086,0.00081678666,0.00070124725,0.00019256696,0.004247836,0.0013507026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012380849,0.0004083564,0.0002648351,0.0030004065,0.009587952,0.0067885076,0.0010600166,0.0025516672,0.011922412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007521024,0.00028813301,0.00033563175,0.0039054092,0.0047501274,0.0010231892,0.0014429732,0.0033150024,0.0011909101],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028461667,0.000044347522,0.010939234,0.00020795269,0.000012030392,0.00032923216,0.002585493,0.00069079717,0.00009240128,0.24469902,0.693594,0.04677701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009611445,0.000009909067,0.030943988,0.00044177668,0.000016456273,0.00009558807,0.0011914833,0.00061836926,0.00017260102,0.0036974396,0.96275526,0.000047439626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9939851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99532664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12741728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12741728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22355151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9244814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965708235","doi":"10.2307/3504645","title":"10.2307/3504645","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Political philosophy; State (computer science); Law; Political science; Sociology; Applied philosophy; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Comparative law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.008321394201013394,"score_gpt":0.22492051744548167,"score_spread":0.21659912324446828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965708235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002959842,0.00033966094,0.00029523936,0.0002986116,0.0003173388,0.000041904408,0.0007795653,0.00046708973,0.99716455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011142149,0.0003626414,0.00042197527,0.00039742616,0.000089502835,0.000029837449,0.0010906002,0.00029905693,0.9961947],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994512,0.00004847098,0.000042648648,0.00015086411,0.00021908185,0.00008765869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980977,0.00044615785,0.000073553,0.0003248004,0.00046645355,0.00059142907],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082580664,0.0015622206,0.0011068301,0.00222088,0.0017952586,0.0047883,0.001776187,0.002806078,0.9846922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020931142,0.0007514048,0.0007158997,0.0026754464,0.0017224031,0.0057015913,0.004011316,0.0016841553,0.9845673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016446713,0.00015592299,0.00049095997,0.00040351695,0.000013191111,0.00016979812,0.00009911361,0.00014639413,0.0013404235,0.0068476237,0.5921835,0.39798513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002366685,0.000031493943,0.0008079787,0.0001805184,0.0000058446694,0.00018889591,0.0001303396,0.00010360725,0.00018451046,0.0012054426,0.9971238,0.00001378603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042668665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004697844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015307784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001138892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013586074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021834612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967693510","doi":"10.1080/01947640903356183","title":"The Campaign to Deny Terminally Ill Patients Information and Choices at the End of Life","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Medicine","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Legislation; Commit; Supreme court; Government (linguistics); Terminally ill; Death with dignity; Order (exchange); Law; Health care; Assisted suicide; Political science; Medicine; Palliative care; Family medicine; Nursing; Business","score_opus":0.008837790986566299,"score_gpt":0.27901969817062305,"score_spread":0.27018190718405677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967693510","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031543116,0.0022118662,0.0008558145,0.47712398,0.015273063,0.00024096874,0.0019067606,0.0007856279,0.49844754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021051727,0.0027507278,0.0010741153,0.37771937,0.005471104,0.0005997082,0.0015172956,0.00026749878,0.5895484],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985839,0.00026093362,0.000053114658,0.00012745165,0.00058236625,0.00039230403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945648,0.0018707091,0.00037120827,0.0003015652,0.0007416681,0.0021500315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019128954,0.0005536199,0.00031687584,0.000567429,0.002718872,0.0029390415,0.0009899309,0.0102807395,0.1763424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011852646,0.0003467463,0.00050103146,0.0002992983,0.0010452922,0.002654241,0.003783205,0.008300146,0.08443348],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010315617,0.00002492993,0.000119640834,0.000017293507,0.0000010258495,0.000024762547,0.000058908183,0.0000058219516,0.000084989806,0.0020149422,0.98539263,0.012244895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003762072,0.000027926992,0.0013781656,0.00013631125,0.0000038383164,0.000050581595,0.0001929456,0.000049349695,0.00017339429,0.0008927843,0.9970493,0.000007821581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009239755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014759099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1763424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011532645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004679801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5899241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980009831","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.1769","title":"Ontario Court of Appeal Takes a Spin at Roulette: <i>Moreira v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corp.</i> , 2013 ONCA 121, February 26, 2013","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Roulette; Appeal; Lottery; Law; Political science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02047576640537435,"score_gpt":0.2381419362012918,"score_spread":0.21766616979591744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980009831","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021237232,0.004076573,0.00091788743,0.13160267,0.0022836078,0.00048601994,0.008014754,0.00025736616,0.8311239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.085213006,0.0020710677,0.00095015846,0.05169552,0.0004240712,0.00018144971,0.0014092915,0.0000996173,0.857956],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977125,0.00009150032,0.00005505972,0.00016548371,0.0012648648,0.000710609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974952,0.00029936768,0.000054009888,0.000066511966,0.0016812386,0.00040366084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017061658,0.00054084964,0.0004887371,0.0010913964,0.01963324,0.0048415414,0.001764595,0.008161006,0.036127023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004157379,0.00085647375,0.0008110382,0.0012402796,0.0020994921,0.0011442335,0.0011263009,0.0050220457,0.0047242464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056041765,0.000026974507,0.0031045796,0.00005599678,0.000018537947,0.00038912956,0.0010800932,0.000089243804,0.0005346245,0.029927803,0.95845324,0.0062637455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055561675,0.000020102636,0.020935338,0.0001245328,0.00006545654,0.00008906597,0.0016785031,0.00037470795,0.0005257056,0.002440253,0.9736121,0.000078633515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9834674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99702245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05810192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05810192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08093245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42156094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992990269","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.46.3.231","title":"The Youth Criminal Justice Act: New Directions and Implementation Issues","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Proportionality (law); Presumption; Seriousness; Political science; Criminal justice; Accountability; Sentencing guidelines; Economic Justice; Criminology; Law; Restorative justice; Psychology","score_opus":0.09592288235905266,"score_gpt":0.35514754309255103,"score_spread":0.25922466073349837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992990269","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003844261,0.03364705,0.0041219564,0.9125268,0.00742414,0.00018264801,0.00017643625,0.00015094948,0.03792575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19698696,0.12908675,0.07257261,0.51363087,0.032162316,0.0023078872,0.0011822112,0.0002629555,0.051807433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96107703,0.015605844,0.0036232616,0.002130085,0.013611101,0.003952735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93192464,0.036439236,0.0041449964,0.0024703413,0.015239918,0.0097807925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049216356,0.0010024045,0.0011597809,0.004496527,0.006538544,0.01855882,0.004538352,0.022129003,0.0078119924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05812106,0.0007619504,0.0012493726,0.0038570927,0.016140087,0.01801804,0.004987059,0.02044716,0.001322096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003095075,0.0002756305,0.0023252114,0.0005537702,0.000015710211,0.0002961482,0.0030681782,0.00047895603,0.00019393205,0.7697345,0.13426691,0.0887601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007174779,0.00017377287,0.0052432576,0.00291914,0.00003582502,0.00035985257,0.004585063,0.0014952199,0.00021058708,0.10202187,0.8827749,0.000108869324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.082082465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0755978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98172706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018272908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07316571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26028413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995526659","doi":"10.3821/1913701x2008141135cbspfa20co2","title":"Competition Bureau Shouldn't Point Finger at Pharmacies:","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Pharmacy; Business; Point (geometry); Advertising; Medicine; Family medicine; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06667409077087244,"score_gpt":0.30410650509887455,"score_spread":0.2374324143280021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995526659","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010154763,0.0011440675,0.00097571005,0.8371755,0.0071921404,0.00011370489,0.00036089332,0.0004200048,0.14246318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07264279,0.0005690553,0.0012920625,0.5924295,0.0017601859,0.00005877731,0.0001569682,0.00021425873,0.33087638],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98166084,0.0011783118,0.0006993751,0.0017460176,0.008700674,0.0060148286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796281,0.0028898956,0.0010976226,0.0006291699,0.007949943,0.007805245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007845489,0.0005265079,0.0007697274,0.0013017972,0.017267626,0.013842028,0.0027617693,0.043265596,0.055215143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034081347,0.00095513614,0.00076686806,0.001550596,0.004142294,0.00575152,0.0032111104,0.02314396,0.014235033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000396843,0.000056902623,0.003357939,0.00003797526,0.00001770393,0.00026871325,0.00092720654,0.00007944572,0.00045933313,0.038599256,0.9413277,0.014828098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065227636,0.000047478603,0.0144300815,0.00011438094,0.000034868946,0.00022144795,0.0018709449,0.0003405418,0.0005559168,0.008207484,0.97399354,0.000118042284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48233736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6744218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9812527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018747317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09277391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95905966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995732436","doi":"10.1163/1571818041904308","title":"Nowhere to turn: The Supreme Court of Canada's denial of a constitutionally-based governmental fiduciary duty to children in foster care","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Children s Rights","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Denial; Fiduciary; Supreme court; Law; Duty; Duty of care; Political science; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.005898822853987835,"score_gpt":0.24837747402933286,"score_spread":0.24247865117534503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995732436","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11354956,0.0074125817,0.0015878223,0.73306406,0.004124368,0.00010890323,0.0004494616,0.00007065772,0.13963258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63464594,0.0027078919,0.0016685781,0.29031643,0.0010146231,0.00008533091,0.0001182375,0.00015047322,0.06929242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829959,0.0018711719,0.000404287,0.0016217629,0.0044092913,0.008697559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98190343,0.007482432,0.0005900754,0.00049824046,0.006120562,0.0034053298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013640613,0.0006041834,0.0013782753,0.0017616458,0.060498573,0.024147028,0.007238497,0.039250504,0.006284051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036847822,0.0013897298,0.0013924583,0.0028866136,0.026118599,0.006264699,0.006031675,0.052308835,0.00050677406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000117593074,0.000060520873,0.0035988714,0.0000682994,0.0000765944,0.0013878457,0.028400606,0.00075360655,0.0005771939,0.76563376,0.18908104,0.010244157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003953279,0.00006915955,0.02117077,0.0012493187,0.00066109514,0.0004987629,0.08918932,0.0026300072,0.0026632175,0.19690186,0.6837117,0.0008595155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9900793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99654394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16159342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16159342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32561898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9724328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003235112","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1280","title":"The Efficacy of Regulation as a Function of Psychological Fit: Reexamining the Hard Law/Soft Law Continuum","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Hard law; Soft law; Law; Compliance (psychology); Perspective (graphical); Function (biology); Incentive; Philosophy of law; Psychology; Social psychology; Comparative law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; International law","score_opus":0.07379689688929711,"score_gpt":0.34910201110018635,"score_spread":0.2753051142108892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003235112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9589199,0.0002619213,0.0044394815,0.0023092008,0.000015885911,0.00007857016,0.000039760653,0.000026818563,0.03390855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988507,0.000037212783,0.000673138,0.00011261051,0.000012435253,0.000026120066,0.000019982916,0.000013023609,0.00025476786],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945064,0.003010293,0.00018594145,0.00065615383,0.0011806546,0.00046059236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92183965,0.05711492,0.0071891453,0.0068730735,0.0037935688,0.0031896438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012119204,0.00034519102,0.00059727044,0.0026165582,0.0015414093,0.005171196,0.0011008222,0.0019230536,0.005273351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054738004,0.00033722518,0.00063300354,0.0014655936,0.009964675,0.0059616086,0.0061915317,0.0046266736,0.00033123413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002009809,0.0029709104,0.59303606,0.00027480736,0.0003474338,0.0004935304,0.05951375,0.0029270635,0.0062045497,0.22242494,0.0009185453,0.10887865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013345183,0.000735128,0.8730438,0.00010675598,0.00013408177,0.0002794739,0.018619128,0.012018297,0.0014968684,0.090690345,0.0026637018,0.00007907823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013051553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073065405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012119204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014468692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000818635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06409323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003496468","doi":"10.1258/rsmmlj.75.2.37","title":"A Claim Delayed May Be a Claim Denied","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Medico-Legal Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Olds College","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.01867714687467659,"score_gpt":0.3449665298723358,"score_spread":0.3262893829976592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003496468","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025065002,0.0041141324,0.00041050263,0.08144938,0.9041224,0.000061756225,0.00014096723,0.00014211283,0.009308019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030605008,0.0038113112,0.0003765026,0.065492064,0.89403987,0.000100287856,0.000080368365,0.00010259976,0.032936487],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99136424,0.0017776517,0.001460247,0.0011053566,0.0034072374,0.00088521675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9452727,0.03595822,0.0023462886,0.0019455709,0.011668445,0.0028087383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01407969,0.0036176902,0.0071220524,0.0057339207,0.0070989453,0.009445012,0.0074100634,0.075824544,0.016379092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0797528,0.0027620397,0.004153904,0.002915527,0.0054369825,0.004375011,0.002130637,0.04624222,0.013358435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045387147,0.00002387391,0.000048323025,0.0001945135,0.000042972544,0.0005866633,0.000029009236,0.000045192824,0.00006859414,0.0013750985,0.9945852,0.0029550588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013451738,0.000046744786,0.00089430105,0.0010560434,0.0002595201,0.00049064675,0.00013302438,0.0006604364,0.00022158759,0.0044886596,0.99153906,0.00007557134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038729985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013462809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075824544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051025674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005538546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0744614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007616212","doi":"10.1089/glr.2004.8.243","title":"How Tribal Gaming Commissions Are Evolving","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"National Capital Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Volume (thermodynamics); Political science; Advertising; Law; Computer science; Business; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.04405696667068869,"score_gpt":0.32550036429346524,"score_spread":0.28144339762277654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007616212","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2352031,0.00880964,0.0031589658,0.30000395,0.002506374,0.00019521792,0.00025910803,0.00009080216,0.4497727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92574656,0.002208198,0.0010694077,0.0223821,0.00065913744,0.00007377619,0.00009823741,0.00007999818,0.047682587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9731189,0.011424674,0.0008845475,0.0021615901,0.00667447,0.005735879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9432322,0.021507584,0.0042818957,0.002797663,0.019964024,0.008216655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023509266,0.00015755776,0.0003543659,0.004978517,0.013066124,0.026592761,0.002897613,0.0076022884,0.016454602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.104526676,0.00049903296,0.00037296058,0.004437987,0.01081475,0.009792823,0.004586996,0.0062313885,0.0014779923],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031788273,0.00011851791,0.016922902,0.00013072041,0.000040968072,0.0006389792,0.030312395,0.00047074948,0.00028656662,0.7913525,0.079970285,0.07972363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040537594,0.000053858992,0.054424237,0.00069210585,0.000052220104,0.0003984255,0.06567179,0.0011132276,0.0004428687,0.17513758,0.7018619,0.00011117777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06749055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17172313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06749055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015486053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030720128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13419545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009358250","doi":"10.1080/07366981.2014.922010","title":"Appreciating Healthcare Data Privacy Laws in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EDPACS","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Kingdom; Health care; Norm (philosophy); Information privacy; Audit; Business; Perspective (graphical); Privacy law; Political science; Public administration; Law; Privacy policy; Accounting","score_opus":0.06985224562273877,"score_gpt":0.32319463858916797,"score_spread":0.2533423929664292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009358250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4042555,0.019663705,0.0022632687,0.24424511,0.0007119674,0.00013211006,0.00040485442,0.000042281772,0.32828125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96995294,0.005163379,0.0009191165,0.015006398,0.00007522806,0.000026190834,0.0000716833,0.00002238143,0.008762535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98019433,0.0029046917,0.00063396303,0.0010067021,0.007822891,0.007437415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9696128,0.011831038,0.002590613,0.0006681891,0.010735782,0.0045614643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012427611,0.0002589636,0.0005327899,0.004823785,0.03677367,0.021421518,0.002137886,0.005001259,0.002252369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035027992,0.00055582315,0.0004580987,0.007952506,0.032942154,0.005902574,0.0064432374,0.008425781,0.00013042484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034757333,0.000036056044,0.015824812,0.000092516755,0.000021090156,0.0007376438,0.09223696,0.000486321,0.00021656543,0.8574774,0.013658707,0.019177204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036783305,0.00004266999,0.084326304,0.0015250525,0.000084592604,0.00044502053,0.3611331,0.0016039008,0.000970709,0.0770566,0.47252697,0.00024825713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9953307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99735093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7308395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2691605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3442887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8476702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010941785","doi":"10.1215/03616878-25-1-133","title":"Riding the Bull: Experience with Individual Market Reform in Washington, Kentucky, and Massachusetts","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Download; Citation; Section (typography); Politics; Library science; Political science; Law; Advertising; Business; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.02959835943018209,"score_gpt":0.345061260811961,"score_spread":0.3154629013817789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010941785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88741004,0.001476332,0.00063994835,0.055517588,0.0002004766,0.00013617914,0.000078325145,0.0000664742,0.054474697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.956975,0.00046763194,0.00031524606,0.010131061,0.00009078905,0.00009397853,0.000060367507,0.000029967217,0.031835977],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99398637,0.0021089346,0.00018662142,0.0004482093,0.0006352351,0.0026346366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99198043,0.0034915956,0.00063543767,0.0003473127,0.00090758514,0.0026376063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077708527,0.00025082828,0.00061391207,0.0011649871,0.032902334,0.009263124,0.0034363645,0.008930384,0.0111446185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0149215385,0.0005150143,0.0004704516,0.0024203681,0.007500845,0.0051334193,0.010255971,0.009047314,0.0006155355],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004769463,0.0017756831,0.08832821,0.00019978923,0.0002042124,0.0062593855,0.5392435,0.0020761066,0.0021378084,0.1524,0.10059393,0.106304355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022660526,0.00065123173,0.09676566,0.00026250718,0.00021656875,0.0005522972,0.46292284,0.001839591,0.0014459965,0.013637287,0.42130992,0.0001695012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49317223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74792254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49317223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021116843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027429339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9806033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011710302","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.1.148","title":"The Case for the Federation of Law Societies Rejecting Trinity Western University's Proposed Law Degree Program","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Academic freedom; Sexual orientation; Legal profession; Sociology; Higher education","score_opus":0.054975110701719655,"score_gpt":0.2780333447581323,"score_spread":0.22305823405641265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011710302","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.096987985,0.0019185407,0.0022253913,0.7098708,0.0034585712,0.0001586346,0.00008352061,0.000055929635,0.18524064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70575696,0.0007476693,0.0016810982,0.19851936,0.0012675287,0.00036785772,0.00010470514,0.000082096114,0.09147268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.963765,0.0081950985,0.00097313186,0.0036181842,0.0050323657,0.018416146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9596395,0.008792861,0.0030598934,0.0025970663,0.007559104,0.018351605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038788185,0.00047348047,0.0009389387,0.0013912924,0.045797076,0.02156348,0.004817752,0.031174615,0.010723339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057357673,0.0008333431,0.0011036047,0.0015087475,0.022813153,0.008625862,0.014799536,0.026921064,0.0011098916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088048946,0.000086645516,0.007758182,0.00005753854,0.000021638483,0.000803035,0.015021454,0.0002627548,0.0002134988,0.8571518,0.10746945,0.011065857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017383891,0.00013181716,0.019091433,0.00082056195,0.00006739319,0.0004538971,0.046814706,0.0011931871,0.00046376145,0.08945654,0.8411162,0.00021675784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3992607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4872733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6007393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031009484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11817084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7938735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W201269595","doi":"10.29173/alr160","title":"Recent Regulatory and Legislative Developments of Interest to Energy Lawyers","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Variety (cybernetics); Energy law; Commission; Public administration; Political science; Key (lock); Business; Law; Environmental law; Computer security","score_opus":0.04310559034669739,"score_gpt":0.31845065880103396,"score_spread":0.2753450684543366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W201269595","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08416441,0.22574876,0.0036293895,0.3621315,0.0048045777,0.00012002918,0.00049714313,0.0002015003,0.31870273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5293681,0.213084,0.006223092,0.14567493,0.012700901,0.0000815384,0.000909248,0.00012004999,0.09183829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927412,0.0012535673,0.00048569494,0.00087036355,0.003412489,0.0012366585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9582328,0.020584058,0.006438929,0.0006971896,0.012294462,0.001752446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009923643,0.0001776484,0.00031672575,0.0027216193,0.0035012255,0.008090286,0.0015010822,0.006347544,0.0059683747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024366217,0.0005460919,0.00039143173,0.005658301,0.0045775105,0.0028792406,0.0011494544,0.0046174857,0.0006621094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018329351,0.00027691832,0.011551071,0.0022131347,0.000055804576,0.0018724476,0.009326175,0.00195358,0.0043243887,0.4353736,0.192807,0.3400625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014295398,0.00005039616,0.016580667,0.00039225296,0.000026182886,0.00045569558,0.0023465622,0.00023822597,0.0010026149,0.0059595928,0.9728857,0.00004783231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10837549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2812201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10837549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019402893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019067852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21548933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013505516","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2006.11.1.49","title":"Filling in the Blanks for Litigation Privilege: <i>Blank</i> v <i>Canada (Minister of Justice)</i>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Blank; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Privilege (computing); Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.0961047505531322,"score_gpt":0.3825391091228876,"score_spread":0.2864343585697554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013505516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019100722,0.0035214713,0.014300163,0.32814345,0.0068420786,0.0008548905,0.0018236941,0.0010667518,0.62434673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3425153,0.0023384993,0.026486307,0.31526428,0.0017935847,0.0006131772,0.0008333632,0.00095648406,0.309199],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9693661,0.003643674,0.0013780837,0.0019038842,0.0133140655,0.010394156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9492253,0.01902963,0.0018616758,0.0030230752,0.020189287,0.006671093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021345109,0.0007094554,0.0014879332,0.004592516,0.030550478,0.019408645,0.0051541505,0.020670034,0.031368475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0848051,0.0015760334,0.0015082986,0.0031176764,0.012499114,0.0076238904,0.005442075,0.015459277,0.004633589],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039992,0.00006212469,0.0020818624,0.000098299985,0.000020100766,0.00040367115,0.003933059,0.00019141957,0.00045024737,0.29687214,0.66710615,0.028740957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007368029,0.000047028647,0.00964657,0.0007999762,0.00009056056,0.00044665413,0.008341546,0.0010576276,0.0019027385,0.08763144,0.88963944,0.00032268738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87089646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9435877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12910354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0483184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23176892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35057616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017025070","doi":"","title":"A Taxonomy of Lawyer Regulation: How Contrasting Theories of Regulation Explain the Divergent Regulatory Regimes in Australia, England/Wales, and North America","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Craft; Political science; Common law; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.017734730989431673,"score_gpt":0.23941946009143175,"score_spread":0.22168472910200007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017025070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22845165,0.0193002,0.0824746,0.14244439,0.0006919743,0.0002991736,0.00012323077,0.00019087638,0.5260239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616283,0.0054803365,0.012425052,0.007080638,0.00015104386,0.00030533675,0.00007911533,0.00005657316,0.012793494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893132,0.0052678413,0.000379559,0.0009891615,0.0024595975,0.001590723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887341,0.0064132954,0.0016194959,0.00075680536,0.0017996853,0.0006765998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01034485,0.0003715579,0.0006721094,0.004924655,0.006305356,0.011721771,0.0026226556,0.0043702926,0.002487365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014641582,0.00046755595,0.0009544934,0.0033291313,0.029468242,0.009517863,0.0041432935,0.004986264,0.00043022394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005799318,0.000018564597,0.0023370562,0.00004352323,0.000004680701,0.000056819637,0.021545833,0.00032732525,0.00008289472,0.9653106,0.0014694514,0.008797478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003280821,0.00006979455,0.019629616,0.001204786,0.00003359059,0.00022330105,0.053344816,0.007989976,0.00033475083,0.7804807,0.13656618,0.000089663634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05350297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04904088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.946497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017122818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013957161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12423533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W202196090","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1299","title":"Canada's Supreme Court and Its National Health Insurance Program: Evaluating the Landmark Chaoulli Decision from a Comparative Perspective","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Landmark; Supreme court; Perspective (graphical); Law; Political science; Section (typography); Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.06415747322803625,"score_gpt":0.3906227387677859,"score_spread":0.32646526553974964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W202196090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10670505,0.023553632,0.0013636731,0.14585029,0.0010251629,0.00007893445,0.00038433733,0.000036807305,0.72100216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94445163,0.005457638,0.00088118314,0.024816465,0.0005711872,0.00006211456,0.00012548419,0.000038700444,0.023595614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873412,0.0026944259,0.00018371767,0.00072255015,0.0040351474,0.0050229738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98926955,0.0044857203,0.0004046978,0.00026374075,0.0046201744,0.000956098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00982612,0.00046422146,0.0009285587,0.0051873205,0.031411026,0.02383469,0.0034391023,0.010177316,0.0066949753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02230714,0.00044056994,0.00071200076,0.0072376756,0.020786023,0.0049775676,0.0034026466,0.008800916,0.00037885507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043591594,0.000023782075,0.0022148814,0.000059838785,0.000033977285,0.00037698593,0.0044464446,0.0006342295,0.00011365222,0.95628786,0.029213956,0.0065507176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018784648,0.00016374684,0.032998588,0.0020555358,0.0005821987,0.00039943078,0.07873004,0.005232598,0.0013720256,0.28586808,0.5920709,0.0003390245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96800274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98789984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19196059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19196059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12892595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93721116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027819035","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14109","title":"Case Comment on <i>Canada v. Fischbacher</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Volume (thermodynamics); Political science; Library science; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics; World Wide Web; Physics","score_opus":0.020119470051829617,"score_gpt":0.2597711806890595,"score_spread":0.2396517106372299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027819035","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035174645,0.0013694101,0.00038907593,0.91766393,0.0053348667,0.00009885324,0.00083483546,0.00012629302,0.07066534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013167276,0.00048903446,0.00030097354,0.9414525,0.0013633819,0.00005658869,0.00012632192,0.000038571885,0.043005273],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946852,0.0003841186,0.00018427648,0.0006486711,0.0023195008,0.0017783246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934608,0.003094439,0.00029913033,0.00019031441,0.001968988,0.0009863322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003854483,0.0009169928,0.001257728,0.0017122901,0.019342097,0.0076150424,0.006224784,0.06768042,0.013221317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014630614,0.0011455875,0.002076301,0.0025745914,0.006853832,0.0027573865,0.0020024288,0.02945606,0.0034042397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003391894,0.000015465199,0.00077057263,0.00003526053,0.000014177987,0.000575597,0.0007336049,0.00011079733,0.00022202652,0.034704935,0.96102625,0.0017574801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006586628,0.000032387314,0.0046401094,0.0002818767,0.000077439996,0.0004490288,0.0026320573,0.00060805125,0.00070152926,0.012452586,0.9779108,0.00014831792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8515004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92873216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14849961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028238136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0583746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29874825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W202828550","doi":"","title":"The Effectiveness of International Legislative Responses to the Helms-Burton Act","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Political science; Jurisdiction; Law; Politics; Legislature; Democracy; Legislation","score_opus":0.015359214123728433,"score_gpt":0.3293505699516135,"score_spread":0.31399135582788507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W202828550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040470563,0.0043920665,0.0016519149,0.01659278,0.0012100643,0.00018169668,0.00028941027,0.00010154432,0.93511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74347466,0.010261837,0.0041970415,0.055238195,0.0012421376,0.00086048734,0.0009970957,0.000273467,0.18345512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98060685,0.0064266506,0.0010033371,0.0015910116,0.0059428466,0.004429304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97391504,0.012635751,0.0046587694,0.0024029375,0.0053815837,0.0010058925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01840403,0.0008731214,0.0004894615,0.0035965166,0.007735468,0.0155355865,0.0017822066,0.004869411,0.009851935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037877142,0.0005766623,0.00076430506,0.0045040036,0.006932215,0.003112584,0.0045144595,0.008552591,0.0022211275],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018762522,0.00026246606,0.01234415,0.00051363546,0.00007452867,0.0006348905,0.017151985,0.0008436692,0.0018818388,0.7802826,0.108441785,0.07738069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003303548,0.0001480028,0.020432003,0.0014434928,0.00013164495,0.00021753012,0.012324843,0.00055308535,0.005219981,0.008868692,0.9505464,0.00008133369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04804043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050461553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04804043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009011222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014677916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09733093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032725796","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2265.2012.00748_26.x","title":"A Second Appeal: A Consideration of Freedom and Social Justice. By Daphne M.Rolle. Pp. vi, 31, Lanham, MD, University Press of America, 2010, $15.99.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Heythrop Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Calgary Laboratory Services","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Economic Justice; Social justice; Citation; Sociology; Law; Library science; Theology; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.02330735780298176,"score_gpt":0.2683693989717078,"score_spread":0.24506204116872604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032725796","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010158594,0.53830373,0.00097556313,0.32057902,0.008976585,0.000022754353,0.000082810206,0.00003849178,0.13000512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10517449,0.2588506,0.0017927854,0.1032885,0.025874106,0.00014591291,0.00018034257,0.00015356633,0.50453967],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872214,0.0005224063,0.000043311873,0.00014983844,0.00040475943,0.00015751769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858886,0.0009038018,0.00009062499,0.000046326506,0.00019532892,0.00017502326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016571577,0.0009870209,0.0005880564,0.0013761066,0.0039183544,0.004999791,0.0014255607,0.007377916,0.03195542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059407484,0.0006479275,0.0006498818,0.0009495681,0.0077281115,0.009075456,0.0028003026,0.0063263224,0.006776122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029485174,0.000020891935,0.00012855035,0.0001116541,0.0000073255387,0.00013351807,0.00042371542,0.00010231886,0.00006533809,0.09181515,0.8777517,0.029410357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024770414,0.000015210089,0.0011527658,0.00080524356,0.000011503854,0.00031971507,0.0014673283,0.00033487962,0.000077935656,0.21281374,0.7829526,0.000024257695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016582482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04611525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03195542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004287292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030442467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10690153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W203816426","doi":"","title":"Must There Be Uniform Standards for Jurisdiction in a Federation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Russian federation; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.01342975026102831,"score_gpt":0.3063085427951787,"score_spread":0.2928787925341504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W203816426","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1799052,0.0064851237,0.075787865,0.25479507,0.0026757044,0.0005390145,0.0004021591,0.0003523588,0.47905743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9433519,0.0006974202,0.020409416,0.017934883,0.00046233804,0.00018822652,0.00011468241,0.000052804564,0.016788324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.950784,0.010983735,0.0031315514,0.004328584,0.018110562,0.01266158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93884456,0.01655112,0.0051294323,0.008799085,0.024564167,0.0061115664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043176558,0.0002784464,0.0013289959,0.0017012472,0.017448157,0.014323351,0.0032081585,0.010674222,0.002920034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.092191085,0.0007668922,0.0011430787,0.0014786721,0.022344757,0.011769926,0.0061100847,0.009694893,0.00065778906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008868693,0.000016330578,0.0006889689,0.000021891565,0.000011946052,0.000056686957,0.0014105522,0.0003446238,0.000090221845,0.9854425,0.005366655,0.006540678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008430277,0.00010646811,0.009193556,0.00066603586,0.00006667613,0.00023775299,0.0052714716,0.0019107806,0.00087893306,0.8033832,0.17798781,0.00021300072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22063494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19997765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22063494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019609977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.068609126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4387014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043803687","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwt038","title":"United States v Windsor: (Docket no 12-307): Supreme Court of the United States: Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan JJ; Roberts CJ, dissenting; Scalia and Thomas JJ dissenting, joined by Roberts CJ as to part I; Alito J dissenting, joined by Thomas J as to parts II and III: 26 June 2013","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Dissenting opinion; Supreme court; Law; Substantive due process; Federalism; Political science; Due Process Clause; State (computer science); Jurisdiction; Appeal; Politics","score_opus":0.008336688054690365,"score_gpt":0.2561875288732041,"score_spread":0.24785084081851375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043803687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0121864965,0.0074135168,0.001166716,0.08050121,0.013686388,0.0013538182,0.016000897,0.00081570813,0.86687523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032825556,0.00213367,0.0012264592,0.09570663,0.0016891418,0.0007784474,0.0039181765,0.00028695873,0.8614349],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99472165,0.00037733358,0.0004310717,0.0008396041,0.0021885762,0.0014417312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969867,0.0007182384,0.00019292375,0.00026290177,0.0014623181,0.00037698392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032802818,0.0011465078,0.0010480423,0.0019733591,0.010402151,0.010958941,0.0036600619,0.032470845,0.06516838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007902236,0.0025715174,0.0017668979,0.0025692168,0.0019837231,0.0041354406,0.00229597,0.0150806215,0.029749116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059787995,0.0000920386,0.0011138744,0.00007748128,0.000030713007,0.00040339702,0.00028162255,0.00008276443,0.0005523438,0.030573934,0.95882344,0.007908671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008010597,0.000021291698,0.0040765856,0.00040733872,0.00004432597,0.0000898457,0.00028269624,0.000132625,0.00048736556,0.0028031138,0.99150413,0.00007056166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3858428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.675898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3858428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011042257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032082103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7671939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048708683","doi":"10.1017/s1537592704470376","title":"Same-Sex Marriage and the Constitution","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Politics; Law; Supreme court; Legitimacy; Political science; State (computer science); Sociology","score_opus":0.013846825684301596,"score_gpt":0.2967608833149278,"score_spread":0.28291405763062616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048708683","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002413348,0.47122076,0.0005709478,0.119036324,0.0060648774,0.000025144882,0.0001612493,0.00003137226,0.40047592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20839688,0.3577526,0.0010098143,0.044413455,0.010963296,0.00020373192,0.00046914682,0.00011041491,0.37668067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902785,0.00039638556,0.00002923752,0.00012539412,0.00019173347,0.00022932571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952257,0.00021504507,0.00007317482,0.00004852347,0.00006178514,0.0000788845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013305531,0.0006849934,0.00037483455,0.0010290429,0.003142449,0.003973549,0.00076914264,0.0044031013,0.015996037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025153607,0.00041386316,0.00031214886,0.0015866191,0.007009641,0.00533325,0.0019298143,0.0048405947,0.0037786358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012728395,0.00002908692,0.00026659362,0.000063703854,0.0000056777167,0.000112875634,0.0017928206,0.000093238865,0.00003023249,0.6526434,0.31289855,0.032051075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009556258,0.000012308428,0.0011941104,0.0005076227,0.000003841186,0.00010841199,0.0009779643,0.00005228426,0.000025224927,0.1470467,0.85005397,0.000008024278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015144072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025909338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015996037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00315143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040218728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053512096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051089205","doi":"10.5195/jlc.2010.1","title":"Protecting a Client’s Confidences: Recent Developments in Privileged Communication Between Attorneys and Accountants","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Commerce","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"PricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Waiver; Transactional leadership; Order (exchange); Representation (politics); Political science; Business; Law; Jurisprudence; Public relations; Internet privacy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04541260549783039,"score_gpt":0.3410863356233887,"score_spread":0.2956737301255583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051089205","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07606598,0.43107742,0.011334669,0.35280943,0.0012242954,0.000032082397,0.0000414122,0.00007474542,0.12734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7771709,0.18316497,0.0065799877,0.018632328,0.0043006516,0.00005037027,0.000045713354,0.000036935486,0.010018141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99004436,0.005148164,0.0006215843,0.00092593586,0.0021735518,0.0010864044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90958375,0.0720755,0.006242808,0.003140042,0.0060431506,0.0029147756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016994875,0.00022762296,0.00047500347,0.0023366027,0.0040824106,0.012453712,0.0026459994,0.007973856,0.00525024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03946027,0.00047686306,0.00041537714,0.0039017494,0.018717116,0.015887951,0.0046559917,0.0076657734,0.00059135514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009945455,0.0001293505,0.0033724436,0.0007896899,0.000016593014,0.000822665,0.019377783,0.00074078026,0.00041333112,0.5565696,0.01035387,0.4073145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038366376,0.00032875378,0.01803157,0.004069417,0.000050567323,0.005277687,0.025634218,0.0034957915,0.0019302355,0.20720538,0.7337456,0.00019254214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008050179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009022573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016994875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007868684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007702255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08987856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W206020881","doi":"","title":"Gender and the Profession: The No-Problem Problem","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Honor; Pleasure; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Representation (politics); Lesbian; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.026315645169295365,"score_gpt":0.2723184401503823,"score_spread":0.24600279498108696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W206020881","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006575206,0.009216283,0.0013940547,0.9297423,0.0047811856,0.000015385967,0.00004319861,0.000017182154,0.048215244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51880777,0.015169487,0.0024082407,0.41037408,0.017343022,0.00015657971,0.00007474037,0.00014431968,0.035521775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9734038,0.014244933,0.00081257505,0.003145191,0.005125902,0.003267591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96460706,0.021557873,0.0016558063,0.0014740705,0.0033573133,0.007347744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024577448,0.0006138155,0.0011678927,0.0024866397,0.015728898,0.009619845,0.0029359164,0.013807559,0.017350534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039578076,0.00056787237,0.00068735675,0.002178274,0.05776485,0.023348296,0.010594443,0.018430376,0.0027231018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007274506,0.00012446416,0.0038724376,0.00024268481,0.000020285535,0.00052562234,0.01919319,0.000079080746,0.00007581391,0.7660415,0.15385312,0.055899028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000642649,0.000080444675,0.0031642115,0.00090657175,0.000015935802,0.0015333301,0.06053249,0.00028045327,0.00007595031,0.51176393,0.42151427,0.0000681311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023253452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023167312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024577448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010203929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012420632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12997955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064054238","doi":"10.1215/03616878-26-3-658","title":"The Making and Meaning of Hospital Policy in the United States and Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Meaning (existential); Citation; Politics; Download; Library science; Political science; Law; Sociology; Public administration; Psychology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02626146355776272,"score_gpt":0.3606816588355035,"score_spread":0.3344201952777408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064054238","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006811697,0.78678775,0.00013246668,0.10257096,0.003643072,0.000024818362,0.0006487501,0.000025924503,0.10548505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030230897,0.86065555,0.00027979934,0.016138239,0.0029089993,0.000044699722,0.00061670673,0.00003344108,0.08909161],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711967,0.0003537159,0.00009220739,0.00013013251,0.0018496495,0.0004545425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99547786,0.00082417927,0.00019088642,0.00007622423,0.0030477352,0.00038318284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016464132,0.00061877473,0.00065946346,0.003569417,0.004045556,0.0066934973,0.0013672705,0.0031060155,0.011087992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006973547,0.00039103214,0.00035254078,0.009380911,0.0034486973,0.0023478789,0.0008057987,0.0028196455,0.001787005],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069524617,0.0000043045443,0.00019346562,0.0003643255,0.000008794772,0.00003264589,0.00035271756,0.00015204854,0.000018323604,0.034558482,0.9205578,0.043750197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003336155,0.000002594224,0.0011887876,0.0009295387,0.000009079133,0.00002502212,0.00047329947,0.000041726667,0.00002006609,0.0025737362,0.9947226,0.000010322797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9228815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9539677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0822168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0822168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13846071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59652746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066751805","doi":"10.1089/glr.2005.9.10","title":"Games of Skill and Chance in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Systems, Applications & Products in Data Processing (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Volume (thermodynamics); Management; Sociology; Humanities; Economics; Computer science; Art; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.013278266526361444,"score_gpt":0.28090421449630576,"score_spread":0.2676259479699443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066751805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09596777,0.071971,0.0011483397,0.11677879,0.0012593884,0.00021902366,0.0024970397,0.00009510701,0.7100636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8869697,0.023870766,0.0005423255,0.009260676,0.0002803026,0.00006503413,0.00049043377,0.00003439326,0.078486525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995739,0.00040664783,0.00007659257,0.00024331233,0.0022481561,0.0012863257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99461246,0.0010100175,0.00023165556,0.00013058554,0.0026582235,0.0013570507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017404127,0.00029506852,0.00049575046,0.0027004879,0.00799983,0.006530185,0.0012012252,0.0019524633,0.011923603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010640236,0.00026770914,0.0003134861,0.0037360447,0.0043185265,0.0014716261,0.0016009322,0.002163697,0.0005062198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007885133,0.00006172501,0.013803825,0.000229373,0.00005377204,0.00014250951,0.0027855735,0.0012109133,0.00018343207,0.505107,0.39360228,0.08274067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000406488,0.00005237065,0.07705261,0.00092199864,0.00008713774,0.00008071762,0.0051937834,0.0015497574,0.00027522317,0.038412206,0.87623006,0.00010343216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9842434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99163896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082455456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.082455456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.122962065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.598259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076488515","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.1.128","title":"“I Wish the Supreme Court Thought More Like Dianne”: A Comment on <i>Krangle v Brisco</i>","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Wish; Political science; Art; Ethnology; Sociology; Literature","score_opus":0.020587774562238485,"score_gpt":0.2452920658503334,"score_spread":0.2247042912880949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076488515","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003781766,0.0021817086,0.00024238291,0.93954706,0.002379383,0.000017093655,0.000056087392,0.00002628362,0.05176811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05825187,0.00093498285,0.00016489747,0.8950253,0.0011644132,0.000037857437,0.000027445143,0.000045588724,0.044347648],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928363,0.0018390379,0.00019018028,0.0009257115,0.0018398211,0.0023689647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99570066,0.0019839946,0.00031577487,0.00009533697,0.001154487,0.0007498076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042561125,0.00042944544,0.00051634095,0.0006105042,0.025724756,0.010049295,0.0039006022,0.036555115,0.008850257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013673044,0.0007340967,0.0010513263,0.0010984187,0.0133663565,0.006275285,0.0041380827,0.039513946,0.001814627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000187421,0.000011639499,0.00078814273,0.000050945673,0.000007691347,0.00069896795,0.009621765,0.000045393466,0.00021898419,0.1371217,0.8489875,0.0024284897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003819053,0.000025728628,0.0030876591,0.00047081785,0.000027682241,0.00042257243,0.03235477,0.00021333311,0.0004929111,0.024566462,0.9381643,0.00013565671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44685048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6039226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44685048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017465398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025043985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.888499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076627798","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.2004.16325","title":"From the Editor-in-Chief: What Do Nursing and the Law Have in Common: Retention","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Nursing leadership","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nursing; Psychology; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.06740083358692409,"score_gpt":0.31784290197605003,"score_spread":0.25044206838912597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076627798","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003465276,0.004338605,0.00006843745,0.05403494,0.94089955,0.000017511009,0.000027904725,0.00002390043,0.0005543844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005107946,0.004061081,0.00008896632,0.03027322,0.9620004,0.000026096848,0.00001928431,0.000024673764,0.0029954605],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898996,0.0023926662,0.001982493,0.0010792493,0.004012089,0.00063393783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9028539,0.045782685,0.0040698377,0.001723088,0.03624085,0.009329662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015819274,0.004349292,0.00934246,0.005965772,0.00767489,0.01448195,0.008338372,0.03582842,0.012137001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07638954,0.0020881074,0.003822749,0.00414974,0.0053672045,0.0069009946,0.0017821667,0.036286946,0.0071891164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003832435,0.000018031496,0.000052130457,0.00039278483,0.00003133615,0.000107219465,0.000029701141,0.000019764293,0.000025000398,0.00023112276,0.99539006,0.0036646088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020817644,0.000103216014,0.0010507767,0.0035993343,0.00046420642,0.0005749383,0.00052749267,0.00048247323,0.00024618843,0.0024537053,0.9901929,0.00009657672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054295794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013433069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03582842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049337535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008613629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08366126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078718453","doi":"10.5172/jfs.327.13.2.133","title":"Redefining marriage or deconstructing society: A Canadian case study","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Studies","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Sociology; Legalization; Existentialism; Law; Economic Justice; Gender studies; Political science; Criminology","score_opus":0.16065818865534542,"score_gpt":0.42514830876905424,"score_spread":0.2644901201137088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078718453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68736154,0.012979656,0.0012888893,0.04479192,0.00046565765,0.00034264,0.00056731876,0.000031106534,0.25217128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96731544,0.009991864,0.0013049593,0.0054022972,0.00006177288,0.000069842215,0.0001231339,0.00002036659,0.015710356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934089,0.0013204623,0.00014293617,0.00044304505,0.0019761503,0.0027085203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952559,0.0016175946,0.00039767573,0.00017578075,0.0014799096,0.001073004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042255884,0.00067092734,0.00066443306,0.0036089644,0.0536264,0.0053240326,0.0026634613,0.004815275,0.0037792837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010585655,0.0004559022,0.00058258174,0.008550118,0.013877312,0.0019586782,0.004651358,0.00529351,0.0002054748],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012114725,0.00023061327,0.028899247,0.00040067892,0.000046198435,0.017164316,0.34417245,0.0012607212,0.0009131363,0.5007568,0.05530718,0.05072746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065852415,0.00009267145,0.039444137,0.0010688419,0.000112810354,0.0056324117,0.46306124,0.0012351417,0.00064041675,0.011866001,0.4765244,0.00025614875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9952571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15533073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15533073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16600391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97969663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W208274694","doi":"","title":"The Act of God Defense: Why Hurricane Katrina & Noah's Flood Don't Qualify","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œReview of litigation","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Storm surge; Storm; Hurricane katrina; Tropical cyclone; Flood myth; Atlantic hurricane; History; Natural disaster; Oceanography; Archaeology; Geology","score_opus":0.01908386068942609,"score_gpt":0.3253921845488619,"score_spread":0.3063083238594358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W208274694","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044883788,0.01083039,0.00034381755,0.9428215,0.011047171,0.000018780727,0.0000501921,0.00006761284,0.030332118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16487128,0.01723545,0.00080169964,0.73576814,0.008159233,0.00009420618,0.00013283567,0.0003566186,0.07258055],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99598277,0.0017630002,0.00011051681,0.00033100627,0.00087225373,0.0009404237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909388,0.0025372142,0.00061438535,0.00024247049,0.0019967605,0.0036703793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043368335,0.00036962645,0.0003568398,0.00049773103,0.011690662,0.0070430036,0.0013485702,0.0076585547,0.029315967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0230732,0.00036379308,0.000267028,0.0004963869,0.010511689,0.0071100285,0.0034190675,0.0174033,0.006403737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011433891,0.000016831398,0.0011442488,0.00004130969,0.000003957866,0.00018158939,0.007561428,0.000013201885,0.00003841541,0.01401378,0.95865643,0.01831741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011624314,0.000027555885,0.0026915579,0.0005512441,0.0000067009864,0.00064451183,0.046300814,0.00008520917,0.00006710032,0.013914037,0.93566674,0.000032901728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034215912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062441047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034215912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006506217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010219901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098071694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084328457","doi":"10.1353/rah.2013.0024","title":"Rethinking Legal Liberalism: The Sexual Freedom Doctrine that Never Was","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reviews in American History","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Liberalism; Doctrine; Civil liberties; Sociology; Economic Justice; Injustice; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.05658699082711832,"score_gpt":0.297354613784197,"score_spread":0.24076762295707865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084328457","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009420483,0.048549082,0.0041256724,0.76030624,0.004492834,0.000015838381,0.0000405117,0.00004301953,0.17300625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67406553,0.032620095,0.0029630507,0.19807239,0.010051944,0.000098894845,0.00006998044,0.00014589514,0.08191235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953754,0.0020621233,0.000103312705,0.00040882055,0.0014606231,0.00058961404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951428,0.0031312716,0.00027014507,0.0003889987,0.00055786595,0.0005088429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054060025,0.00035222046,0.00036299837,0.0011914223,0.0065047042,0.008684122,0.0011003137,0.005613461,0.0034865607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012072402,0.00026721822,0.00037288482,0.00087526004,0.053660218,0.012295405,0.0060590724,0.011403584,0.00088249997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052217392,0.000010536551,0.000119310826,0.000016923874,0.0000020084924,0.00007002185,0.0042918976,0.00004868684,0.000080864585,0.9438022,0.037640627,0.013911745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001052991,0.00001080398,0.000347551,0.00024846144,0.000003084883,0.00009957997,0.004215142,0.00011446804,0.00014036304,0.69930965,0.29548612,0.000014210762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011857528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023434367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011857528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068135634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009686143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049436152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087100822","doi":"10.5663/aps.v3i1&amp;2.21704","title":"Case Commentary: Manitoba Métis Federation v. Canada and Manitoba","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Political science; Genealogy; Library science; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.17026464547054096,"score_gpt":0.4944043371446504,"score_spread":0.3241396916741094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087100822","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006093611,0.0025318936,0.00018642146,0.95523834,0.0043391804,0.00002978212,0.00011546594,0.000022295784,0.031442944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07636566,0.0028405206,0.0003264937,0.8851687,0.0024301682,0.000040513216,0.000047768568,0.000030286617,0.032749914],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964585,0.00054544857,0.00015607793,0.00043016978,0.0009825298,0.0014273124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99096745,0.003435883,0.0004572997,0.00021020953,0.002759088,0.0021700654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029039432,0.0006354231,0.0008477487,0.0012112764,0.028616276,0.0053831325,0.0057199756,0.039123315,0.011188909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01359012,0.00092035305,0.0008487631,0.0027610129,0.009825104,0.0024959347,0.0026388553,0.037964523,0.001324777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004759488,0.000022458571,0.004310555,0.00015690074,0.000038006357,0.0071968627,0.00794126,0.0002121533,0.00022978721,0.054388087,0.91863066,0.0068256604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085164604,0.000021349466,0.005671904,0.0016383807,0.00010877355,0.004192845,0.023715733,0.00055503775,0.00040160815,0.014451304,0.9490187,0.00013927389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9357013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97533995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06429869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052675176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15998435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3821869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W209576043","doi":"","title":"U.S. ruling ignores Canadian Internet users’ privacy rights","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; The Internet; Business; Privacy rights; Computer security; Information privacy; Computer science; Political science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.0345170458778531,"score_gpt":0.27525231177220744,"score_spread":0.24073526589435434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W209576043","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047781393,0.0018312202,0.0015172955,0.2175794,0.0015051488,0.00012753224,0.0015404187,0.00020659741,0.727911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57501423,0.0028164666,0.0033990915,0.18872508,0.00067210675,0.000121751385,0.0006990014,0.00017959914,0.22837272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847928,0.00090881775,0.00033927005,0.0012553483,0.008194413,0.0045093675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9728485,0.009629977,0.0006232125,0.0013239761,0.012948569,0.0026257462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073904702,0.0005877166,0.00069285627,0.0031601184,0.032509126,0.013928079,0.0033909723,0.012325084,0.0129292635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03278413,0.0006877112,0.0012240316,0.0049745054,0.008836127,0.0027421075,0.0030568442,0.012403254,0.0016623219],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010766144,0.000051497453,0.0064050825,0.00007724567,0.000032452564,0.0005481617,0.006804553,0.0004381807,0.0006111087,0.5195733,0.44181293,0.023537848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015969104,0.000039937615,0.016066426,0.0004057631,0.00021757411,0.00021368657,0.007238923,0.0019304503,0.0022174523,0.040616654,0.9306574,0.00023603802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99036646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9938992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077677466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.077677466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19656843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5635921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095969229","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1029735","title":"The Problem of Official Discretion in Anti-Terrorism Law: Comment on Khawajah","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Terrorism; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.009732085653718662,"score_gpt":0.29073789709406467,"score_spread":0.28100581144034603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095969229","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005831004,0.0018923676,0.00038603414,0.97425485,0.0026770947,0.000022704751,0.00010383534,0.000020462621,0.014811685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08118765,0.001393865,0.00042750835,0.89822227,0.0086079575,0.000071280614,0.000028515738,0.000052671578,0.01000832],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913277,0.00218357,0.0006127925,0.0017656918,0.0019024179,0.0022078664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9594618,0.03229412,0.002047602,0.0013862355,0.0034409175,0.001369382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014342065,0.00063837925,0.002011632,0.001376433,0.014089138,0.0110556055,0.0058273557,0.080344215,0.007485581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03769964,0.0011788545,0.0016565078,0.0021596744,0.022059353,0.0121709835,0.005886988,0.057194047,0.0020720067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022542081,0.000065177956,0.0012442813,0.00022288744,0.000083548046,0.00071317784,0.008636401,0.00028198247,0.00041921047,0.4662597,0.5158982,0.0059500625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005357152,0.00009829302,0.008156021,0.0012583332,0.00031729726,0.0005893837,0.016936583,0.0012856161,0.0017259785,0.30839664,0.6602029,0.000497243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05543665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06899167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.080344215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075632515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012099109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11022794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099437096","doi":"","title":"Same-Sex Marriage in Canada: Contributions from the Courts, the Executive, and Parliament","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Law; Executive order; Executive power; Politics","score_opus":0.006973245466474039,"score_gpt":0.24459392306279873,"score_spread":0.2376206775963247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099437096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6479128,0.056271058,0.00035890672,0.17525758,0.0010398286,0.00010832236,0.0021482874,0.000019571884,0.11688361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9564514,0.021759732,0.00022490382,0.0073601343,0.00021540234,0.000019958912,0.0003798013,0.000019899499,0.013568663],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99346364,0.00086533703,0.0001613464,0.00033455258,0.0021653168,0.0030098006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98220026,0.0042504636,0.0010102829,0.00022975814,0.008396536,0.0039126794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047945664,0.00036365262,0.0007887606,0.0044312277,0.022149883,0.008053785,0.0025837326,0.003923118,0.0069117676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020880122,0.0004383944,0.00048168434,0.012203212,0.00589818,0.002048245,0.0037041563,0.0048538735,0.00023000705],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038528978,0.00027731643,0.31810355,0.0009775811,0.0002758316,0.0017383398,0.18444265,0.0016101941,0.00029689737,0.15039542,0.14769427,0.1938026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058550162,0.0000576895,0.49148235,0.0017472608,0.00034962397,0.0003265211,0.28614196,0.0014441025,0.0003775712,0.00868572,0.20911731,0.00021133744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99858594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1704339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1704339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33210313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9621791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W210520605","doi":"","title":"John Marshall Globalized1","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Constitutionality; Constitutionalism; Political science; Separation of powers; Democracy; Politics; Limited government; Impeachment; Sociology","score_opus":0.018162318802768918,"score_gpt":0.2881237672120543,"score_spread":0.2699614484092854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W210520605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035709802,0.013182653,0.0012699935,0.18025216,0.010959322,0.00003825837,0.00039373027,0.00023803028,0.790095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031135453,0.005779538,0.00069028285,0.04955987,0.0014154778,0.000034583612,0.00022118266,0.0001760708,0.9109876],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991504,0.00013609801,0.000022155882,0.0002603608,0.00025833,0.00017262813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946254,0.00008071692,0.00004480469,0.000065098684,0.00019445091,0.00015241711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000693428,0.0007144201,0.00024094798,0.00068205845,0.0056033265,0.0069264458,0.0007872277,0.0030657258,0.06620702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022909031,0.00024988662,0.00029241142,0.0006723586,0.002797493,0.004355865,0.003834013,0.0051831147,0.013663865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011719605,0.000011556167,0.0003939167,0.0000454444,0.000003387067,0.00014170997,0.0010578996,0.000043613603,0.00016597858,0.1560236,0.8133484,0.028752673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.5894417e-7,0.0000023716836,0.00012289392,0.000040802308,8.546932e-7,0.000040375933,0.00026131148,0.0000109846405,0.00005931573,0.00298575,0.9964715,0.0000029525033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030971235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.067946956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06620702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040106284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00508428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22148454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107990315","doi":"","title":"Expanding the Role of Culture in British Columbia's Adoption Scheme","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Government (linguistics); Cultural heritage; Public relations; Perspective (graphical); Ambiguity; Political science; Best interests; Public administration; Law; Business; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.026866553479299244,"score_gpt":0.32071451691811753,"score_spread":0.2938479634388183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107990315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26804885,0.062582955,0.0034180325,0.06599868,0.00072921993,0.00029707258,0.00048189439,0.000105563464,0.5983377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.919999,0.023555508,0.0026736013,0.010495676,0.0001140863,0.00013333603,0.00015975944,0.000032146825,0.042836793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99412656,0.001142532,0.00026314522,0.00044275683,0.0024869223,0.0015381927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901183,0.0035671934,0.00048710275,0.0005482888,0.004141627,0.0011375223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005880924,0.00022851386,0.00038532785,0.004182121,0.014271378,0.008873723,0.0029235624,0.0030221904,0.0052139293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013815503,0.0004505906,0.00028034538,0.0055921176,0.011292317,0.0020210173,0.004292141,0.004255989,0.0002644957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032711574,0.000049914786,0.018012078,0.00031134626,0.000023034747,0.0011814593,0.019784467,0.0009419011,0.000601588,0.7613334,0.03101968,0.16670837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005089517,0.00006751813,0.12829174,0.004312939,0.0001316649,0.00059539126,0.031259038,0.00264621,0.00076257886,0.07044106,0.76121914,0.00022191145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9694287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9868335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08505054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08505054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13680741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6170877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109825357","doi":"10.1002/j.1939-4640.2004.tb03151.x","title":"Who's Your Daddy?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Andrology","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University College of the North","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Child support; Law; Complaint; Psychology; Criminology; Political science","score_opus":0.025783801724154436,"score_gpt":0.33151859761338776,"score_spread":0.3057347958892333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109825357","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017049778,0.015004612,0.0009679136,0.6823721,0.022575123,0.0000379234,0.00029914003,0.0001861681,0.2615073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13320455,0.011044437,0.00073947007,0.3122694,0.0039343964,0.00005062989,0.00027757778,0.00013727383,0.53834224],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862254,0.0005953236,0.00006349809,0.00015307749,0.0002428318,0.00032277915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752206,0.0004359037,0.00018914859,0.00008968767,0.0005343575,0.0012287897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013754455,0.00033664794,0.00034030474,0.00055591454,0.00777676,0.0040629287,0.00062915625,0.00318593,0.043442458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006536453,0.00023902958,0.00022729093,0.00037577358,0.0025314689,0.0042451555,0.0023673072,0.0046756514,0.01572419],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019258254,0.00003151552,0.0042575933,0.00005290652,0.000003978223,0.0010768876,0.010876931,0.000009727476,0.00013935621,0.017171064,0.92230153,0.04405929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023873627,0.00001122963,0.001408338,0.00013224302,0.000002322516,0.0016019691,0.023688804,0.000013530698,0.00007268523,0.0017050067,0.97135127,0.000010306804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00959215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02612398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043442458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016325326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018943171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14532948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111481304","doi":"","title":"St. John's University School of Law - 2013 An Introduction to the Symposium","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology; Engineering physics; Engineering","score_opus":0.01072183227894385,"score_gpt":0.2457794590543913,"score_spread":0.23505762677544745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111481304","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001288555,0.11818411,0.0015602352,0.25747436,0.057304278,0.00010889231,0.0005756751,0.00022460379,0.5632793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013919348,0.044188917,0.0010313435,0.016320122,0.016693885,0.00008860776,0.0002613757,0.00014997425,0.9073466],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998487,0.00027467674,0.00007221356,0.00020644485,0.0007269895,0.00023254733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836797,0.00020569177,0.000051254767,0.00008802434,0.00055766484,0.000729288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025470972,0.0006968102,0.00062324275,0.0023878827,0.0074222228,0.009841796,0.0011265846,0.0056505185,0.12731399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029133223,0.00079860556,0.00054167566,0.0024622104,0.0029623935,0.0042468486,0.003273902,0.007392275,0.035102434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070630754,0.00002945672,0.00010347576,0.000055680353,0.0000018131748,0.000035771147,0.00019037405,0.00005563715,0.00007989104,0.037654076,0.93378687,0.027999895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022525776,0.00000447032,0.00042709438,0.00023854739,0.0000011583097,0.000018761646,0.00020277889,0.000037495625,0.000036570043,0.004284492,0.99473995,0.0000063819293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031014176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.121483915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12731399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009504629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0118213175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42590773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112888221","doi":"","title":"Oil and Freshwater Don't Mix: Transnational Regulation of Drilling in the Great Lakes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College environmental affairs law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oil drilling; Jurisdiction; Drilling; Shore; Oil reserves; Oil pollution; Oil spill; Fossil fuel; Environmental planning; Environmental protection; Business; Natural resource economics; Environmental science; Petroleum; Law; Oceanography; Political science; Engineering; Geology; Economics; Waste management","score_opus":0.010407559926024797,"score_gpt":0.23930098447593456,"score_spread":0.22889342454990977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112888221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20375833,0.0083430465,0.009822396,0.22324422,0.00052691426,0.00012871707,0.00011765895,0.00008253864,0.5539761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95206106,0.0017448426,0.0012833445,0.02438397,0.000223244,0.00009072749,0.000024677616,0.000023008297,0.020165138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99140114,0.0037949358,0.0004450566,0.0009664161,0.0021339431,0.0012584989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99245304,0.004959012,0.00069870445,0.000516332,0.0010385924,0.0003342519],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010484182,0.00015695691,0.00028268338,0.0008374985,0.0060180114,0.008147003,0.0012057545,0.008182208,0.0023663817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015304701,0.00034509474,0.00059232314,0.00085369544,0.012908997,0.0042799744,0.0045640767,0.005858978,0.00020519306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015675432,0.000014693973,0.0012559722,0.000038308368,0.000016835833,0.00030391544,0.0035469292,0.0005959371,0.00048586904,0.98105824,0.007531167,0.0051363413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013884493,0.0001161636,0.013084419,0.0005115583,0.00019523311,0.00037652015,0.013665058,0.005881829,0.0027060322,0.5898429,0.37331098,0.00017040895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058104463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08524958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94189554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006311562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011483181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11553252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126710748","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.2002.19159","title":"Pont du Gard Forum, \"Let's Get Real\" - The Nether Side Revealed","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Nursing leadership","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Sciences Centre; Sunnybrook Health Science Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.3072337490193521,"score_gpt":0.37339169103675257,"score_spread":0.0661579420174005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126710748","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003952887,0.13922524,0.00055964343,0.817704,0.032623056,0.000018315364,0.00010864205,0.00003623946,0.009329449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014868691,0.09862055,0.0011028863,0.8063124,0.017061578,0.00008816171,0.000101807425,0.0000722673,0.06177163],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965843,0.0013013579,0.00015448326,0.0003729548,0.0013740425,0.00021281252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880675,0.008553122,0.00041359387,0.00037404726,0.0019476935,0.0006440876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050653545,0.00056349405,0.0010195698,0.0011932077,0.0043110717,0.0067606,0.0015503797,0.013762971,0.012749221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027210204,0.00035415162,0.00060986733,0.0016009208,0.005276053,0.0066623767,0.0026308468,0.016440177,0.0029933327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030407884,0.000009286739,0.00015220219,0.00033505214,0.000016340837,0.00010885141,0.00047180222,0.00003258521,0.000113548886,0.029381253,0.93005997,0.039288696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014447456,0.000008505988,0.00039585016,0.0009603554,0.000013768635,0.00007135438,0.0008384025,0.00003597864,0.00012257686,0.011278921,0.98624414,0.000015621677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020428587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060076118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020428587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035852597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008968049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0426504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128765631","doi":"","title":"Stumbling Toward Total Information Awareness: The Security of Canada Information Sharing Act","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Information sharing; Information security; Business; Information security management; Internet privacy; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Security information and event management; Cloud computing security; World Wide Web; Law; Cloud computing","score_opus":0.017644946319456543,"score_gpt":0.269815469725017,"score_spread":0.25217052340556045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128765631","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20968008,0.0029257846,0.0035932502,0.43825525,0.00057095883,0.00015475517,0.00051837333,0.000089327936,0.3442122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93944395,0.0010255433,0.0014965718,0.022875618,0.00012680248,0.000053839423,0.00009132639,0.00004322119,0.03484311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9813965,0.002953041,0.00039626195,0.0012005933,0.008743624,0.0053100633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96120226,0.014172041,0.0017671272,0.001927482,0.012925306,0.008005771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009932123,0.00041798182,0.00063461636,0.0028027361,0.034168538,0.017182441,0.002824753,0.010127863,0.008520861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05078224,0.0005499982,0.00060503854,0.0033297928,0.019621292,0.0075609325,0.006865976,0.01274424,0.0005455467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087123655,0.000053107295,0.009804115,0.000049536575,0.000046497113,0.00021275601,0.023068285,0.0009294015,0.0003003458,0.85579467,0.081183605,0.02847054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011986108,0.000071913186,0.056714945,0.0005693803,0.00020125916,0.00019466768,0.043188926,0.005553164,0.001444521,0.28182897,0.60970914,0.0004032187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99101955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9925822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86549366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13450637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32711446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9759166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128775454","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1210","title":"Representing a Minor: A Shared Dilemma in Ontario and Massachusetts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Minor (academic); Harm; Compromise; Dilemma; Confidentiality; Law; Irrational number; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04862358677588755,"score_gpt":0.2734139214565873,"score_spread":0.22479033468069978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128775454","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35541168,0.0042633903,0.0036499274,0.41809493,0.0011984389,0.0001472226,0.00009703009,0.00008153154,0.21705581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9347778,0.0010210491,0.0008406839,0.023837794,0.00025353394,0.000044457418,0.00002173138,0.000027174563,0.039175782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900484,0.002679957,0.0003659722,0.00086675026,0.0027365414,0.003302275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99251306,0.0022641183,0.0005917977,0.00028385993,0.0016242359,0.0027229576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071206973,0.00030233545,0.00046215532,0.0008418956,0.035360016,0.0076193204,0.0032577189,0.008903557,0.004834929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017132942,0.00054443924,0.00047778193,0.0011004453,0.016553137,0.002953339,0.007290575,0.0053395876,0.0003586101],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012072143,0.00007145192,0.014387895,0.00013754776,0.00004108049,0.008983168,0.28800103,0.000465116,0.0015024542,0.5522479,0.09524833,0.038793303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074212105,0.000100087556,0.019665433,0.0005036831,0.000086191474,0.0023155108,0.23615421,0.0008097874,0.0005899464,0.05861907,0.6808821,0.00019976537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9122275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9699293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08777249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08763321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07829871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6358264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131200747","doi":"","title":"Fail-Safe Federalism and Climate Change: The Case of U.S. and Canadian Forest Policy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Treaty; Decentralization; Government (linguistics); Climate change; Political science; Corporate governance; Negotiation; Public administration; Business; Politics; Law; Ecology; Finance","score_opus":0.05114417643714488,"score_gpt":0.2662013001789001,"score_spread":0.2150571237417552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131200747","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1323615,0.011830102,0.0032178212,0.1768999,0.0006849426,0.0001547937,0.0006283888,0.0001057048,0.6741169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9494174,0.0035328018,0.0014340504,0.015941279,0.00013127898,0.000090464,0.00018441021,0.000041983894,0.029226309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834315,0.0020781779,0.0002873954,0.0011903589,0.0049541984,0.008058366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99046963,0.002179355,0.00048570186,0.0008367853,0.0044951965,0.0015333787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01143486,0.00046939045,0.0007723862,0.003323279,0.052259922,0.011870257,0.0033648994,0.006704759,0.006361816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020137621,0.00043899572,0.0012345403,0.0055433023,0.022282166,0.0034610296,0.004976885,0.008791391,0.0002462711],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024883468,0.000012368391,0.0027975754,0.000033852844,0.000030378997,0.00022009977,0.004501717,0.0009869415,0.000107711625,0.96539205,0.01746693,0.008425539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013181522,0.000035825877,0.04047265,0.0004994994,0.00024957611,0.00024809662,0.013545926,0.0038421964,0.0004475987,0.30006164,0.6401814,0.00028370228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99530315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80684566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19315432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24450971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9358266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135982753","doi":"","title":"Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. United States Forest Service","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Center (category theory); Environmental law; Service (business); Environmental protection; Forestry; Political science; Geography; Law; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Business; Chemistry","score_opus":0.0219474293172689,"score_gpt":0.2629660277357925,"score_spread":0.24101859841852358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135982753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036884144,0.00203877,0.0011273464,0.068180665,0.0014310345,0.0002682554,0.0015706193,0.00035241802,0.8881468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26657492,0.0012551375,0.001624584,0.14790793,0.00040831073,0.00036104565,0.00081890845,0.000096495176,0.58095264],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99533385,0.00035300804,0.00015594461,0.0005192263,0.0021573042,0.0014806143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99687934,0.00123278,0.00013432295,0.00012169139,0.0012171409,0.00041482478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028036947,0.00051616033,0.00029283907,0.0013027102,0.016497843,0.005429734,0.0016841295,0.009943255,0.019240582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070246127,0.0007558945,0.00052905065,0.0011383216,0.0026014661,0.0015617686,0.0014066971,0.0061253207,0.0033574703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071806666,0.00014336407,0.0057191476,0.00007499267,0.000020262307,0.0010608578,0.0024955363,0.0002275626,0.0017825934,0.27534547,0.6919794,0.021079034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083633866,0.00007573783,0.012159028,0.00014117529,0.0000488906,0.00019693538,0.001650209,0.00053676084,0.0014659545,0.009711752,0.97382224,0.000107764725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71552026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88783246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71552026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013281104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04235292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5723102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139388177","doi":"10.25071/1916-9272.34375","title":"The Yellow Brick Road? Establishing a Constitutional Right to State-Funded Counsel for Matters of Civil Law in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Public Policy Administration and Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; State (computer science); Brick; Political science; Constitutional right; Constitutional law; Engineering; Constitution; Civil engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.040851247097714566,"score_gpt":0.2943698147545478,"score_spread":0.2535185676568332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139388177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4460208,0.0050160373,0.003894884,0.14383703,0.00033353217,0.00025239363,0.00078470155,0.00009474199,0.39976585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684738,0.0012496869,0.0015609375,0.007297877,0.000042311818,0.000033156746,0.00009743116,0.000022679289,0.021222187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920013,0.0008219866,0.00018280944,0.0005623473,0.0023934692,0.004038065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99098325,0.0027710986,0.00050991715,0.00035363817,0.0029776578,0.0024044379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005271726,0.00021258024,0.000543263,0.001473696,0.02188442,0.008982257,0.0021074063,0.003200076,0.0074788854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017813865,0.00051609566,0.0003525374,0.0020761173,0.007887561,0.0022743118,0.0028568532,0.004636649,0.0002351385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092995,0.000055490145,0.016490439,0.00012189072,0.000041940963,0.0006679861,0.012349214,0.0016052303,0.00095066626,0.8969055,0.038390342,0.032328356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025969252,0.00012011879,0.17636916,0.0010848874,0.00025241196,0.0005138588,0.051945686,0.009411918,0.0026098355,0.11648564,0.6404119,0.0005348512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99848855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13817997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13817997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28852302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139950611","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2364141","title":"Joint Venture Theurgy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Joint venture; Business; Joint (building); Venture capital; Business administration; Finance; Engineering","score_opus":0.010635684814514558,"score_gpt":0.2528073147070377,"score_spread":0.24217162989252317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139950611","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016567688,0.0030508745,0.0023056758,0.017148713,0.009999727,0.00019015839,0.0004112195,0.00028483555,0.9500412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08002233,0.00069197826,0.0004927816,0.0034754674,0.0026362464,0.000121619465,0.00028386046,0.00008045842,0.9121954],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99672604,0.0003909618,0.000107344014,0.00054121885,0.0013370133,0.00089743617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942719,0.0007606098,0.0002614371,0.0009168028,0.00085875666,0.0029305937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030288943,0.00049282506,0.00069677166,0.001765057,0.003436188,0.008409895,0.0012217276,0.005187289,0.1141334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0080834655,0.00034797937,0.0006332887,0.0009993721,0.0012642912,0.0025756473,0.0052993735,0.0049061044,0.032393858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023248263,0.0002902554,0.002190938,0.00012602225,0.00003885801,0.00097126456,0.0004865061,0.00021287163,0.0012630506,0.26051405,0.6204308,0.11324293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042345484,0.000090597154,0.0023634955,0.000063567255,0.000010286764,0.0003370953,0.00023684413,0.0004619602,0.00030847522,0.016536435,0.9795348,0.000014101229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014462948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035989045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1141334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017708846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066070785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38181424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142554591","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2002.tb00848.x","title":"DETERMINING THE EFFECTIVE REPRESENTATION OF A CHILD IN OUR LEGAL SYSTEM","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Association (psychology); Process (computing); Professional responsibility; Psychology; Law; Professional conduct; Child custody; Association rule learning; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.03252536613617515,"score_gpt":0.33035479595454686,"score_spread":0.29782942981837174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142554591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66045845,0.0011629877,0.03791065,0.02655689,0.0001248147,0.0006442682,0.000111773,0.00008067986,0.27294952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98302114,0.00027402214,0.010875194,0.0006445269,0.000018848368,0.0000935791,0.000013130328,0.000014874043,0.005044682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9637636,0.025007218,0.0013923392,0.0014146823,0.00518868,0.0032334938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9696423,0.017033443,0.004274341,0.0018907817,0.0060402933,0.0011189126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034581155,0.00014846555,0.00026282528,0.0018143315,0.0106911855,0.011015025,0.0014449017,0.0023625416,0.00404536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.088067725,0.0004362801,0.00021254175,0.0011214275,0.010137343,0.005476926,0.005710554,0.0025616237,0.00060906925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039682403,0.00005902722,0.03096234,0.00010977267,0.000017970637,0.0012807407,0.08974352,0.0013259528,0.0022144902,0.8009694,0.0062140445,0.06706315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008627092,0.000369743,0.06582706,0.0014363666,0.00015998646,0.002972333,0.30070308,0.01271731,0.015703687,0.23109712,0.3687393,0.00018775497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04291555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06501102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04291555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01068196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021144863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18288481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142746656","doi":"","title":"EF Cultural Travel v. Explorica: The Protection of Confidential Commercial Information in the American and Canadian Contexts","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Confidentiality; Business; Meaning (existential); Point (geometry); Constructive; Scope (computer science); Internet privacy; Advertising; Law; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.021587877450341436,"score_gpt":0.27180676372958085,"score_spread":0.2502188862792394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142746656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15670852,0.0071618124,0.0020403008,0.16372113,0.0005706228,0.00016858285,0.00068836025,0.00008883403,0.66885185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8578577,0.003460176,0.0015859698,0.06275643,0.00019901172,0.00009271397,0.000119345954,0.000040304098,0.07388836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98974866,0.0010833062,0.0002579724,0.0008780543,0.004540613,0.0034913917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882988,0.0054743346,0.0005716897,0.00057423,0.0035748058,0.0015061385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005650896,0.0004727334,0.00039108712,0.0023284014,0.03549606,0.014324422,0.0027211756,0.014151589,0.00480211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017918829,0.0007156685,0.00067433255,0.0035792224,0.02312254,0.003935394,0.003700716,0.009907994,0.00035893125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005588429,0.000027702432,0.003197369,0.000058072914,0.000012307837,0.0010621257,0.021810057,0.00029026598,0.0004091869,0.91241026,0.04983068,0.010835986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012689742,0.000100382495,0.032716945,0.0009762512,0.0002441474,0.0010909805,0.06861423,0.002299476,0.0023393177,0.103616044,0.78722936,0.0006460498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98985463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9934156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083557695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.083557695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1391154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60625637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143586171","doi":"","title":"Tortious Liability for Negligent Misdiagnosis of Learning Disabilities: A Comparative Study of English and American Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas international law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Punitive damages; Jury; Jurisdiction; Common law; Pleading; Tort; English law; Plaintiff; Political science; Trial court; Liability; Supreme court; Sociology","score_opus":0.038290024550209426,"score_gpt":0.3600164189409897,"score_spread":0.32172639439078027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143586171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.948335,0.007861009,0.00035940245,0.0032721234,0.000040705727,0.000018101997,0.000047119654,0.0000032176767,0.040063396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950506,0.0027570103,0.00009024474,0.0004985266,0.000048175436,0.000011541999,0.000019294053,0.0000027811652,0.0015219052],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998293,0.0007280005,0.00009050756,0.00012147965,0.00042081275,0.0003461719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874598,0.009910324,0.0010142782,0.00014120984,0.001056249,0.00041823194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027196321,0.00010843021,0.00030041265,0.0045690755,0.0022984028,0.0027839772,0.0004888999,0.0012707979,0.0044144746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009723607,0.00018254355,0.00020849807,0.003722499,0.00367835,0.0045970744,0.0017786142,0.0009585909,0.00018218378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002781044,0.0010184421,0.15835951,0.00061188167,0.00010437856,0.0068417103,0.5860817,0.00029777066,0.0018852691,0.14066723,0.007466824,0.09638732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002304227,0.0004039296,0.57440704,0.0009003785,0.00006935069,0.0038240752,0.35225296,0.00045821903,0.00033824902,0.008960237,0.05830761,0.000054823206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0128591405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03689526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0128591405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025767388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001059537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025568604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153328781","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwt036","title":"Religious Values and Two Same-Sex Marriage Cases Decided by the Supreme Court of the United States","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Supreme court; Law; Estate; State (computer science); Spouse; Political science; Legislation; Federal law; Constitutionality","score_opus":0.013814926514620133,"score_gpt":0.27714526891225655,"score_spread":0.2633303423976364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153328781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3736858,0.0064294874,0.0020114828,0.12772958,0.0049220207,0.00039802454,0.0008114583,0.00010314877,0.483909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8534591,0.0023137555,0.001256977,0.07458378,0.0013662397,0.00030473256,0.000296578,0.000042182088,0.06637656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930583,0.0011535117,0.00035024752,0.0006137903,0.0020417382,0.0027823409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945523,0.002712358,0.00034828708,0.00027996628,0.0008839351,0.0012230546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006426513,0.00042406743,0.0006427143,0.001520232,0.023241125,0.005329902,0.0023269707,0.013671264,0.008129252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0140134,0.0010661768,0.0014112089,0.0014890196,0.006953528,0.0023164218,0.0051339916,0.01819642,0.00090550346],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002213126,0.00045259937,0.008472593,0.00009336728,0.000073994255,0.011417049,0.020654764,0.0003089419,0.0013098995,0.79834783,0.14221504,0.01643263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089542044,0.00037339746,0.02849303,0.0010764189,0.00038174356,0.0035691014,0.03708581,0.001821994,0.0053672353,0.10561837,0.81488556,0.0004319773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.117476605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26672235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.117476605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007966053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010568738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23358566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160729556","doi":"","title":"Mandatory Bankruptcy Counseling: The Canadian Experience","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Legislature; Debt; Creditor; Agency (philosophy); Business; Accounting; Actuarial science; Finance; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.022149580153710335,"score_gpt":0.25935564143064077,"score_spread":0.23720606127693045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160729556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6300654,0.041555304,0.0016714503,0.11309834,0.0022520025,0.00066972844,0.0014748916,0.00025201685,0.20896089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89954984,0.043201678,0.002300743,0.014533262,0.00036129256,0.0001378943,0.0006239047,0.000149487,0.03914196],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99685585,0.00048604113,0.000100607205,0.000252277,0.0010996416,0.0012055031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99185187,0.0010490592,0.00040775954,0.00020410173,0.0017126559,0.004774508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028522601,0.0005423359,0.00041929338,0.0012149903,0.016711447,0.0036756438,0.0033927597,0.0027318671,0.012816525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008496154,0.00052862475,0.00037170615,0.0050981347,0.0051072827,0.0013416269,0.0028582392,0.0039277677,0.0006464925],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042528607,0.0028471327,0.07860765,0.0012397091,0.00007526666,0.016384227,0.13676949,0.0010170307,0.0012766084,0.038027037,0.23920879,0.4841218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014029973,0.0005564929,0.11817922,0.0022304247,0.00007747607,0.011552216,0.080776244,0.0009674945,0.00067437126,0.0026714017,0.7818977,0.00027668354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95458496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047425896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047425896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12938459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3441006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161250834","doi":"10.1353/sch.2011.0013","title":"Lochner and Constitutional Continuity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Constitution; Substantive due process; Doctrine; Political science; Constitutional law; Constitutional right; Sociology","score_opus":0.05440738764365759,"score_gpt":0.261243954552733,"score_spread":0.20683656690907543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161250834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021836825,0.015543043,0.003910819,0.111100666,0.00071201846,0.00004054497,0.000099724966,0.000040553245,0.84671587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8719646,0.004580981,0.0013197768,0.025008915,0.0013497954,0.00012627148,0.000086817156,0.00006141417,0.09550141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99328446,0.0026617902,0.00017772918,0.0014995091,0.00093136297,0.001445083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996609,0.0018092901,0.0002787373,0.0005495066,0.00037180062,0.00038170887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057237325,0.00023661609,0.00043737254,0.0013834098,0.009277209,0.007707516,0.0011511483,0.005266642,0.013321656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00796172,0.00026729263,0.0003168665,0.0012981873,0.045347564,0.008989,0.0072900956,0.007467514,0.000945487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022524177,0.0000017376113,0.000038592916,0.000002758352,3.8255493e-7,0.000016687107,0.00043512703,0.000020110074,0.000009840888,0.9963935,0.0021054223,0.0009735871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002626413,0.000014608823,0.00049385487,0.00014210418,0.0000048098764,0.00006599332,0.0015086638,0.000100708545,0.00009543317,0.7597518,0.2377793,0.000016464992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019013047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016852094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019013047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013759303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007530148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099831164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W216126594","doi":"","title":"Sidestepping Deference: How United States v. Ressam Encourages Overly Stringent Review of Sentencing Decisions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Law; Supreme court; Discretion; Standard of review; Ninth; Sentence; Remand (court procedure); Political science; Sentencing guidelines; Criminal Conviction; Conviction; Computer science","score_opus":0.060716333327436534,"score_gpt":0.30114480023069,"score_spread":0.24042846690325348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W216126594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26334554,0.0036993106,0.020042863,0.14701888,0.0019977754,0.00027836027,0.00010305805,0.0010508304,0.5624634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9478878,0.00060018135,0.004614686,0.03228555,0.00032748358,0.00012512426,0.00003519162,0.00012852221,0.0139954975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96732473,0.017511217,0.00094765495,0.002452305,0.0069055925,0.004858506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9440286,0.040421657,0.0023580801,0.002883166,0.007364736,0.0029437235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028883196,0.0003986833,0.00050029915,0.0022075053,0.016511552,0.012584824,0.0034098641,0.0110257,0.006954697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08984003,0.00088386785,0.00072059664,0.0013843225,0.008647256,0.005291612,0.007920713,0.010835771,0.0010696092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001685811,0.00035203036,0.015451034,0.0002302303,0.00008680485,0.006420225,0.058501296,0.0042779543,0.00218378,0.6062153,0.2043462,0.101766594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016930854,0.00066911796,0.02295546,0.0019528121,0.00029612394,0.0023080495,0.044993326,0.012831764,0.00298254,0.2824137,0.6279216,0.0005062553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06356984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14676417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06356984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009310967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022062551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15275079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161914410","doi":"10.1300/j082v48n03_06","title":"Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in North America","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Homosexuality","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Sodomy; Sexual orientation; Gay rights; Gender identity; Homosexuality; Political science; Law; Same sex; Criminology; Gender studies; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04396964410420226,"score_gpt":0.37378586109260487,"score_spread":0.3298162169884026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161914410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9732178,0.0032996782,0.000028213308,0.001311728,0.00003498378,0.00000598909,0.00012741663,0.0000017282102,0.021972466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99557495,0.0021423274,0.000034201283,0.00029005072,0.000016425614,0.000005474361,0.000062128216,0.0000021622534,0.0018723457],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99974376,0.000071089584,0.0000079861065,0.00002158673,0.00006205808,0.00009353795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993364,0.00011834195,0.00019564689,0.00001670259,0.0001262162,0.00020675373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040575225,0.000075595155,0.00016133951,0.0012293993,0.0025561007,0.0011698673,0.00015504919,0.00023800533,0.0035392984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010231448,0.000074206044,0.00010422069,0.0016991388,0.001109437,0.00056952506,0.00075745466,0.00044378964,0.0001295767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012807305,0.00019096045,0.8103855,0.00009093508,0.0000366601,0.00072081323,0.11784007,0.00006379328,0.0007070346,0.011740108,0.004171586,0.053924367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028178715,0.000027584836,0.9110584,0.000084467654,0.000009678424,0.0002478096,0.07353867,0.00003085742,0.000057438032,0.0005177727,0.014417586,0.000006844154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3441722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66684127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3441722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002259402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019346523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6843378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164598656","doi":"","title":"The Paper Tiger Awakens: NOrth American Environmental Law After the Cozumel Reef Case","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tiger; Fishery; Reef; Geography; Law; Political science; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.009028591866510343,"score_gpt":0.2471793717977171,"score_spread":0.23815077993120676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164598656","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24639419,0.0063392906,0.0008172592,0.39407963,0.0010469351,0.000032069373,0.00008428215,0.00003762328,0.35116875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8820568,0.0028737672,0.0003771459,0.053430736,0.00047335715,0.00006044442,0.000048469483,0.000030768,0.060648456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761,0.00050871616,0.00004426343,0.00035668127,0.00044684578,0.00103353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817944,0.0009029359,0.0002649725,0.00011778352,0.00030504403,0.00022976071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031343396,0.00016234569,0.0002563787,0.0007645641,0.020482268,0.007783618,0.0011791397,0.007783655,0.003439877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061036972,0.00025388514,0.0003035777,0.0014330598,0.010976435,0.0043817707,0.003506548,0.008936599,0.0002824711],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000461248,0.00005466158,0.008561966,0.00007044449,0.000009893427,0.0033783833,0.052105498,0.00026079296,0.00047592068,0.7966491,0.11665086,0.021736242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025006813,0.00004068121,0.023173677,0.00032462546,0.000024023624,0.0007061229,0.04983921,0.00033400976,0.0007940308,0.04142993,0.88323355,0.000075066346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37445685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54573375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6255431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017685272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011696283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7445545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169484996","doi":"","title":"How Marriage Became Optional: Cohabitation, Gender, and the Emerging Functional Norms","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Census; Ambivalence; Family law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Stepfamily; Nuclear family; Remarriage; Gender studies; Sociology; Extended family; Family values; Demographic economics; Demography; Political science; Geography; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Population; Economics","score_opus":0.06946662032263941,"score_gpt":0.25978442389773554,"score_spread":0.19031780357509614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169484996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87160796,0.002513028,0.0046122894,0.02484816,0.00017309937,0.000022371338,0.00006584928,0.000009889385,0.09614721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982876,0.00044998594,0.00027321282,0.00033543006,0.000041092466,0.000005471475,0.0000133614085,0.0000041156254,0.000589754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966133,0.0019938948,0.00012328978,0.00037325104,0.0005004573,0.0003958441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99514115,0.0023487299,0.00087348913,0.00028280015,0.00063100044,0.00072284654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054768715,0.00012692607,0.00018175988,0.0012123955,0.0039481963,0.00395468,0.00093708327,0.0007943923,0.0018415573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014208507,0.00016853379,0.00016087713,0.0007931189,0.026995476,0.005397203,0.0031542387,0.002107994,0.000097721364],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006701397,0.00007812396,0.06953948,0.000031363856,0.000010674527,0.0005268414,0.18470712,0.00017344148,0.00045874246,0.6911843,0.0018526247,0.051370323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002292018,0.00013608272,0.15719582,0.00031029255,0.000020713966,0.0011823642,0.27179495,0.0011606469,0.0006347556,0.50896937,0.05849323,0.00007884604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016664697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023168046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016664697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022361723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024255684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033135355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171410223","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwv021","title":"Space Enough for a Christian Law School","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Space (punctuation); Law; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.028646026292544837,"score_gpt":0.30848409275868804,"score_spread":0.27983806646614323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171410223","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017416809,0.0025069898,0.00093896483,0.22998522,0.005437199,0.00007392703,0.00020382693,0.00019933496,0.74323773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32706627,0.0018283147,0.0008990054,0.078029,0.0032234497,0.00007729594,0.00014642405,0.00023023188,0.5885],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761605,0.00055589556,0.00006364388,0.00017192075,0.0006250734,0.0009674902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99219996,0.0007430776,0.00029645013,0.0004475576,0.0010484667,0.0052646333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016750284,0.00024547597,0.0003047013,0.0010633153,0.01183268,0.009859673,0.0006642757,0.005599459,0.23270757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008157476,0.00028734322,0.0002905146,0.0007629345,0.005265488,0.009124189,0.010788139,0.0055111004,0.028015122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035517005,0.00013716702,0.0018958615,0.00010807202,0.000008209131,0.0007837841,0.010969061,0.000048877446,0.00038387868,0.19535355,0.7547567,0.03551926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010638819,0.000019409264,0.0010395935,0.0001754201,0.0000023461898,0.00015750641,0.00836673,0.000029835539,0.000067980895,0.01021483,0.979902,0.000013605776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010191348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0246107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23270757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023398842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057496224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7784844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173693669","doi":"10.21991/c9rm2r","title":"The Assisted Human Reproduction Act Reference and the Thin Line Between Health and Crime","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Legislature; Legislation; Law; Jurisdiction; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Political science; Reproduction; Criminal jurisdiction; Power (physics); Human rights; Public administration; Politics; Biology","score_opus":0.04897607700576859,"score_gpt":0.3266017884079739,"score_spread":0.27762571140220527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2173693669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03747603,0.013183261,0.016121814,0.118551716,0.0033746879,0.0002442693,0.00033336494,0.00018964444,0.8105252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7763462,0.0043327915,0.014065738,0.0608303,0.0020757779,0.00071101735,0.00020851287,0.0001217187,0.14130792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.968821,0.015151041,0.0019568517,0.0037152583,0.007807162,0.0025486522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980149,0.014191995,0.0013376562,0.0017979973,0.0019690755,0.0005543708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02152665,0.00042136878,0.0007150866,0.0020506107,0.0093424115,0.009190733,0.002396284,0.01846147,0.0047830967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04143878,0.00069561583,0.00084183976,0.0017668079,0.03339182,0.005340454,0.005072954,0.011831187,0.001013234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032838047,0.0000043329032,0.00007396291,0.000008959321,0.0000011022554,0.000035335488,0.0013285753,0.000030408382,0.0000412194,0.99368674,0.0029684962,0.0018176155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059711354,0.00013773295,0.0039243074,0.00073021837,0.000034983157,0.00048528722,0.003317755,0.00068961637,0.0008933947,0.44417033,0.54541844,0.00013822337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050551027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05516222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050551027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009117957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018103644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11384517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2174176022","doi":"","title":"A Bare Desire to Harm: Transgender People and the Equal Protection Clause","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Golder Associates (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Transgender; Equal Protection Clause; Supreme court; Scrutiny; Plaintiff; Law; Suspect; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Lesbian; Harm; Sociology; Gender studies; Medicine","score_opus":0.11816255827801277,"score_gpt":0.3329016496125383,"score_spread":0.21473909133452557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2174176022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041205242,0.007437999,0.009500959,0.36730412,0.0025131353,0.000095806194,0.00008910587,0.00004675758,0.57180685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71606034,0.0023857716,0.002699332,0.23462674,0.0023687726,0.0002740388,0.00005244447,0.000056826604,0.041475736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98681086,0.0054218513,0.00048403372,0.0017343422,0.0032806427,0.0022681218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98939335,0.008011044,0.0004957975,0.00067178905,0.00072893465,0.0006990369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01359817,0.0005199847,0.0007248807,0.00080421043,0.016619427,0.012128577,0.0027587872,0.030855602,0.0056548654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017684031,0.00068055827,0.0010413199,0.00079552527,0.035984594,0.013169372,0.008102272,0.027127478,0.0008667888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044356375,0.000010182376,0.0000907393,0.000005781428,0.0000014990343,0.000090212445,0.0014362247,0.000024739906,0.000040610277,0.99364966,0.0036128797,0.0010328861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006734479,0.000047110152,0.00070760655,0.00037890606,0.000024748764,0.00028777667,0.0035823402,0.00053529494,0.00042787218,0.8595782,0.13430008,0.0000627099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01928292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022391435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030855602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005818376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011301136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07191485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2175355199","doi":"","title":"The Importance of Selective Federal Preemption in the U.S. Securities Regulatory Framework: A Lesson from Canada, Our Neighbor to the North","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chapman University Digital Commons (Chapman University)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Security market; Business; Third market; Stock exchange; Stock market; Private placement; Investment banking; Financial system; Broker-dealer; Preemption; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.014892692460394107,"score_gpt":0.22434166990413315,"score_spread":0.20944897744373905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2175355199","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034140073,0.025265818,0.002750945,0.65413016,0.0016558869,0.000058225152,0.00030717094,0.00006806886,0.2816237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80221254,0.018558592,0.004451445,0.12649365,0.0010198193,0.00007045325,0.00018435642,0.00008657455,0.04692263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.990611,0.0012970043,0.00025486946,0.0008560339,0.003791561,0.0031895929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861609,0.004137648,0.0005710027,0.0005339267,0.006803302,0.001793235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0094098775,0.00031842123,0.00047486878,0.0019428245,0.022011463,0.012596705,0.002207225,0.0066757323,0.0042437064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018303894,0.00041193428,0.00052085996,0.0026489722,0.022627609,0.0037731526,0.0022639313,0.009597859,0.00043797583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001972665,0.000013506463,0.001962977,0.000053013344,0.0000091232205,0.00013831594,0.0053150686,0.0005372684,0.00022101581,0.87800664,0.08908562,0.024637759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005095461,0.000029330782,0.018049402,0.0014499438,0.000050208993,0.00014481714,0.013802539,0.001540372,0.0007078163,0.27381432,0.69018036,0.00017993724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9837196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9909764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11625022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11625022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23731928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8434583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2176580901","doi":"","title":"The Celebration of the 40th Anniversary of Ronald H. Brown's Graduation from St. John's School of Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Graduation (instrument); Law; Political science; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.013369594270397833,"score_gpt":0.25584544181841723,"score_spread":0.2424758475480194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2176580901","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005620472,0.0130947,0.0005300443,0.61615866,0.2619144,0.000032351014,0.00044588852,0.00015137657,0.10205213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05243907,0.006342467,0.0004783185,0.086974464,0.052817315,0.00006711043,0.0002630375,0.00022518368,0.8003929],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977132,0.00025209985,0.000055610162,0.00024985714,0.0011008502,0.0006283409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957372,0.00031600066,0.00017622721,0.00017887935,0.0010704977,0.0025211843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034779743,0.00063013233,0.00066586735,0.0008662014,0.007871835,0.007381374,0.0010179626,0.0057808277,0.024277797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008662684,0.00042728486,0.00053326396,0.0005798123,0.003562081,0.0032450103,0.006310847,0.011257064,0.013632962],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002016713,0.00002007908,0.00025120107,0.000020478094,0.0000031931802,0.00007966759,0.0002666893,0.000021703585,0.00009402224,0.008025723,0.9840179,0.0071792654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036141462,0.000016064687,0.0015098426,0.00006765428,0.0000024023889,0.000053544103,0.000534933,0.000027187207,0.00013033827,0.0025268362,0.9951159,0.000011714213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01117761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0593821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024277797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047044703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036566071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08121735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2179633363","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1245","title":"The Charter 25 Years Later: The Good, the Bad, and the Challenges","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Newspaper; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; History; Law; Media studies; Advertising; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.01750348607281817,"score_gpt":0.27215274406333234,"score_spread":0.2546492579905142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2179633363","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047092903,0.015882455,0.0009865897,0.8844582,0.033720262,0.000016346557,0.00012128649,0.0000760597,0.0600296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24981448,0.0148928845,0.0025669106,0.45044115,0.034488726,0.00008569573,0.00028496727,0.0003950418,0.24703021],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908042,0.0032801006,0.00025317477,0.0007388187,0.0033818958,0.0015418495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99068475,0.0026568575,0.00076922536,0.00053463585,0.0032842592,0.0020704083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010256417,0.00044969292,0.00044103974,0.0008305269,0.00977357,0.018499603,0.0010127472,0.009352421,0.012085824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032158908,0.00018844477,0.0005323183,0.001173089,0.009095104,0.011456246,0.002850129,0.020277329,0.0025486168],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030927524,0.000027569198,0.00063675916,0.00003092894,0.000004319154,0.00011362057,0.0019304419,0.00007106174,0.000104540195,0.18663642,0.78869337,0.021720067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000867579,0.00002866512,0.0014229299,0.00013753603,0.000005363964,0.000062667845,0.002747712,0.00008210607,0.000148454,0.020618172,0.9747039,0.000033874607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0417282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051827528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9582718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0080046225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012488676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08297062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181345678","doi":"","title":"3) Consider approval of Interlocal Agreement between Canadian County and the City of Oklahoma City pertaining to grading, draining, and hard surf acing of certain streets within the City which are continuations or connecting links in the State or County Highway system or other projects that mutually benefit the two jurisdictions, and is located within Canadian County. Children's Justice Center","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Archaeology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.043355502605640826,"score_gpt":0.2863884139864069,"score_spread":0.24303291138076608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181345678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05767867,0.0005926885,0.0057133753,0.13107492,0.0011046089,0.001027127,0.0019643605,0.00028869303,0.8005555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47428405,0.0005197892,0.009141989,0.19556135,0.0005797841,0.0009120862,0.00054546015,0.00009285497,0.31836268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900525,0.0009298424,0.0002885282,0.0008651212,0.002380837,0.0054830476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924359,0.0021000837,0.00029666402,0.0002963753,0.0037491461,0.0011217218],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006002688,0.000562203,0.00064206467,0.0015057084,0.02759786,0.008106243,0.0037056785,0.03229439,0.023067366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011284705,0.0009252266,0.0013507612,0.0012294931,0.0044103647,0.0023383542,0.0033299394,0.007993638,0.0023625474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012472963,0.00022020319,0.01822104,0.00012513208,0.00009627197,0.0045342846,0.016445968,0.0015417668,0.0021551214,0.6853007,0.25682473,0.01441008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017255128,0.00016173112,0.029493371,0.00026760512,0.00026859026,0.00055240217,0.02853556,0.003059582,0.0016131314,0.03337888,0.9021823,0.0003143563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9468814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97693264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03614858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06364278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26227754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2189752036","doi":"","title":"A Further Note on Final Note: The Scope and Limits of Judicial Law Making","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Legislature; Political science; Equity (law); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06312479471144636,"score_gpt":0.39137233326407306,"score_spread":0.32824753855262667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2189752036","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049073896,0.014961463,0.008395295,0.6964214,0.008690688,0.00014764935,0.0005194539,0.0001204926,0.2658362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22944991,0.0070686485,0.00982879,0.4986446,0.010671357,0.00038290693,0.00035570425,0.00017492363,0.2434233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907749,0.0027631044,0.0003838655,0.0012870624,0.00299952,0.0017915147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873055,0.008640156,0.00031782643,0.0005165271,0.0028411243,0.000378865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00602242,0.0005024969,0.0004888237,0.0010810529,0.0110815205,0.011849033,0.0031064898,0.013576326,0.012453447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025612118,0.0005388532,0.001104415,0.001160869,0.015738372,0.01079881,0.0028508287,0.016036497,0.0023974252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017941054,0.000013828225,0.000256472,0.00004937572,0.0000059192944,0.00015049292,0.0021289405,0.00009665767,0.00018228113,0.7300518,0.26156926,0.005476955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028020997,0.000034350844,0.0015297196,0.00035449793,0.0000143758525,0.00011147073,0.0028133674,0.00030613097,0.0005593606,0.31241938,0.68175805,0.00007131419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12992539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2301988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12992539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010887739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011458671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2583382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2195660638","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court's Remedial Decision in the Insite Case","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Remedial education; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.024232597098618715,"score_gpt":0.28690811156191726,"score_spread":0.26267551446329857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2195660638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26662612,0.0011837301,0.009062037,0.19557253,0.0026170418,0.00024228876,0.00037549454,0.00019074451,0.52413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93227905,0.00023891615,0.0017059308,0.021135816,0.00091174664,0.0000800323,0.000063548985,0.00005483554,0.04353004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853845,0.0029799254,0.00057109323,0.0020561954,0.0039331582,0.005075113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880086,0.008130598,0.0005923461,0.0008215999,0.0014610983,0.0009858507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012384578,0.00048364338,0.0013215931,0.0019358607,0.012605076,0.010634936,0.0040721023,0.039030153,0.009573161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052559737,0.00070426037,0.001420727,0.0011502786,0.008025691,0.00470686,0.0046041887,0.019595457,0.0015156341],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000195506,0.0001791578,0.0017630865,0.000032853677,0.000051056315,0.0025674552,0.0023466302,0.0008710989,0.0010359433,0.9482968,0.03549116,0.0071691927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006138089,0.00023981999,0.0099712955,0.00028198044,0.00035139752,0.0016447012,0.0072216503,0.00979083,0.0047501936,0.82109857,0.14371262,0.00032310167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03298835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06429132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039030153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056190346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0135125965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06559265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2196959378","doi":"","title":"Last Words: A Survey and Analysis of Federal Judges' Views on Allocution in Sentencing","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Remorse; Sentencing guidelines; Criminal justice; Political science; Law; Craft; Psychology; Criminal procedure; Economic Justice; Quarter (Canadian coin); Criminology; Social psychology; Sentence; History","score_opus":0.02047924057071578,"score_gpt":0.2979585752552062,"score_spread":0.27747933468449043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2196959378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968184,0.00022121875,0.00019176482,0.0006641384,0.00000926291,0.000013304822,0.000037936697,0.000003142872,0.002040748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99899405,0.00021310832,0.00013191537,0.00015938138,0.000012588778,0.000022091845,0.000036828464,0.0000022688484,0.00042776013],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98440015,0.010454961,0.001077397,0.000570055,0.0022085626,0.001288967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95794463,0.023947516,0.008540905,0.0010894311,0.006765858,0.001711597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015073414,0.00015465834,0.00033039265,0.0018211537,0.0030880237,0.002064452,0.00061804126,0.0010069218,0.0012282459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048962295,0.00035168376,0.00024234096,0.0018938495,0.0016460308,0.0016923436,0.0012967958,0.0012432756,0.00023153074],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035372446,0.00027037584,0.433641,0.00026439712,0.000061877865,0.0005458456,0.48685738,0.00030466638,0.0037616645,0.0036278581,0.005381151,0.06493007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018083634,0.00043604756,0.5984593,0.00032006355,0.000037864404,0.00038964234,0.3822757,0.0008210851,0.0009659278,0.00087107316,0.015322875,0.00008226735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011854221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020008186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015073414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019481027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021024693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0797168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W219804546","doi":"","title":"Applying the Holder Standard to Speech That Provides Material Support to Terrorism in United States V. Mehanna","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard journal of law & public policy/Harvard journal of law and public policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Civil liberties; Terrorism; Verdict; Conviction; Political science; Habeas corpus; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03616701957154553,"score_gpt":0.3136454666598135,"score_spread":0.27747844708826797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W219804546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30936813,0.004909531,0.010432018,0.15402304,0.00642731,0.0007819641,0.00057166955,0.0003165063,0.5131698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8541934,0.0010813451,0.004305082,0.11075851,0.0015095449,0.00064264593,0.00014688366,0.00007890132,0.027283652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9785685,0.008099583,0.0014478103,0.0025020847,0.005368756,0.0040133023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9699972,0.02296094,0.0016506052,0.0015688617,0.0027581158,0.0010642239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032092284,0.00075200445,0.0007270822,0.0023020732,0.013346467,0.011041809,0.003166491,0.02780788,0.004847367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059127163,0.0011347024,0.0010852447,0.0011238004,0.012210393,0.007651064,0.009644058,0.023887772,0.001010013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003424068,0.00020734835,0.006776478,0.0002800804,0.00008049224,0.0051884525,0.029863404,0.00043773244,0.002776949,0.87411356,0.056606192,0.023326954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006237513,0.0017392846,0.035521295,0.0035647904,0.00069617113,0.0021849861,0.043844935,0.0026564768,0.015656173,0.2844425,0.60837585,0.0006938238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041236255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06445377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041236255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053978637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010990156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16972226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2198551708","doi":"10.7202/1100326ar","title":"THE NEW CHOICE OF LAW RULES IN TORTS: THE AFTERMATH OF TOLOFSON V. JENSEN; LUCAS V. GAGNON","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02331861216708627,"score_gpt":0.3094122674864674,"score_spread":0.28609365531938113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2198551708","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12281598,0.016492251,0.009654894,0.1718338,0.0019124823,0.000096667776,0.00022886884,0.00008980078,0.67687523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9240271,0.0035491516,0.0030554251,0.018687468,0.00056008063,0.000043258813,0.000054539425,0.000057086774,0.049965836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98808205,0.002172515,0.00039991256,0.0015917189,0.0057165236,0.0020373652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945774,0.0030211003,0.0003539763,0.0003081064,0.001239671,0.0004996722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006414406,0.00034416592,0.00043844664,0.0015511933,0.008984291,0.011600921,0.0023744204,0.0074661146,0.0014926327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009890376,0.00060076447,0.00056045403,0.0012315889,0.027800322,0.0053827725,0.0024935945,0.009330217,0.00016147466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009387419,0.0000045624265,0.0002564308,0.000010595929,0.0000021130104,0.00014661865,0.0025699413,0.00014264045,0.00011816899,0.9882472,0.0044499245,0.004042245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094558156,0.000059554106,0.0063497215,0.0004465738,0.000055115324,0.00050961407,0.006174605,0.0026988953,0.0013893007,0.4883984,0.4936042,0.00021950454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.761104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8469436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.761104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06572835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037100364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48060578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2200737601","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: POLI 220 - The Politics of Human Rights: Finding Supreme Court of Canada Decisions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Politics; Political science; Law; Human rights; Supreme Court Decisions","score_opus":0.043216611542104086,"score_gpt":0.31423144463254943,"score_spread":0.27101483309044533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2200737601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051915746,0.031772282,0.0010682922,0.0807705,0.0007526926,0.00025112156,0.003983223,0.00016340075,0.8293228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35201848,0.00920081,0.0019681703,0.014922616,0.0002768789,0.00022179811,0.00075126276,0.00016206774,0.6204779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812096,0.00027651954,0.000043640775,0.00016942277,0.00069168373,0.0006977725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983364,0.0006091882,0.000060514856,0.000048536655,0.0007072222,0.00023833255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001962582,0.00053723797,0.00047366487,0.0032198967,0.019657107,0.0125202825,0.0018580864,0.007200234,0.03543001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005546754,0.0005105693,0.00038943268,0.005659055,0.006282926,0.0033060105,0.002489114,0.0053411475,0.001259297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037497226,0.00004762105,0.003219543,0.00013913744,0.000015723866,0.00041528867,0.00934429,0.00039400175,0.00020015548,0.6763723,0.2828169,0.026997516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004027248,0.00001603087,0.017263928,0.0006333908,0.00004047779,0.00014401761,0.02385303,0.0008876532,0.0007905763,0.060287755,0.89594334,0.000099549565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9878462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09945027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09945027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14182203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7215656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2207417587","doi":"","title":"My Neighbour's Kid Just Bought a Drone . . . New Paradigms for Privacy Law in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Drone; Law; Privacy law; Political science; Information privacy; Internet privacy; Privacy policy; Computer science","score_opus":0.030682969472982404,"score_gpt":0.29180995916633656,"score_spread":0.2611269896933542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2207417587","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.092008956,0.0054097916,0.0051219338,0.46936923,0.0016081076,0.00012934828,0.00088844483,0.00014072208,0.4253234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6810267,0.0039599924,0.0036787256,0.064548716,0.00019609627,0.000055335604,0.0002103844,0.00010991814,0.24621421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99426067,0.0007560794,0.00012487255,0.00059775537,0.0019378959,0.0023226736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993739,0.001205941,0.00019993374,0.00016612181,0.0025793181,0.0021096668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030198812,0.0002613744,0.00036988023,0.0009838435,0.033066045,0.012128124,0.0016230675,0.0052649737,0.014701279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010399678,0.0004313695,0.00040208467,0.0017218409,0.009160162,0.0036970782,0.002931648,0.008704111,0.0010864818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049551145,0.000038549275,0.009434046,0.000102847196,0.000016691987,0.00065008306,0.023606043,0.00055290037,0.000379035,0.6942942,0.23434998,0.03652607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005416057,0.00004039203,0.016627405,0.00036559347,0.000048376227,0.00026555947,0.03868867,0.0023889004,0.00060959824,0.06740893,0.873308,0.00019453163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11312749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11312749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26875407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82080126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2213730134","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2627030","title":"The 'Red Menace' on Trial: Jury Discrimination in Dennis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Law; Jury trial; Political science; Psychology; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0336958732526119,"score_gpt":0.3292454144415412,"score_spread":0.2955495411889293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2213730134","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30466884,0.003668306,0.0019846275,0.4173407,0.002841652,0.00008107142,0.00012032649,0.000031621537,0.2692628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8985912,0.0008194747,0.00044962432,0.04723947,0.0005854902,0.00008523452,0.000024016248,0.00005793198,0.052147437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98512137,0.0072664297,0.00048260012,0.0016700695,0.0018820061,0.003577612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98392063,0.011219913,0.0008824017,0.0006004939,0.0007773841,0.00259924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018900486,0.00026419174,0.0009444939,0.0011616666,0.025996998,0.010394116,0.0022570386,0.013660304,0.014302806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055261604,0.00047739266,0.00035839324,0.0011936931,0.0147273615,0.0057009235,0.009645064,0.016238788,0.0010140993],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020971397,0.00023616402,0.013350708,0.000068334724,0.000024853458,0.001285302,0.042212173,0.00026616294,0.00026598963,0.77984923,0.11821795,0.044013474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017715627,0.00021387312,0.036172565,0.0010116384,0.00008481588,0.001585239,0.113171615,0.001914434,0.0015573637,0.53342336,0.31046954,0.00021852662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047252297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12037537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047252297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066562826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015610486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09995651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215341176","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1054","title":"Into the Wasteland: Applying Equality Principles to Medical Inadmissibility in Canadian Immigration Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04223248256360731,"score_gpt":0.37202400221443904,"score_spread":0.32979151965083175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215341176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09483413,0.00614652,0.015589154,0.17873044,0.00068612525,0.00019114999,0.00018716288,0.000048649086,0.7035867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9600127,0.0016576119,0.0028219928,0.009510039,0.0001987224,0.00007610658,0.000030145626,0.000026743224,0.025665976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.985316,0.00393708,0.00039265884,0.0008497461,0.0035965713,0.0059079668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907699,0.0053333226,0.00051360426,0.00044294266,0.0021385783,0.00080156204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0113905445,0.00048445642,0.00065324473,0.004055755,0.02439435,0.01118863,0.0028721497,0.0077632796,0.008284489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034358643,0.0006359181,0.0007489834,0.0035781614,0.050215784,0.007693554,0.008465428,0.0077899806,0.0002551959],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006802857,0.000004927877,0.00070786686,0.00001630149,0.0000037242578,0.000076857265,0.004689641,0.00028345824,0.000016195345,0.98752606,0.0024478976,0.0042203343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056828354,0.00002918368,0.00909281,0.0005495786,0.000074951495,0.00011832689,0.027207647,0.0028591775,0.00025194028,0.8556761,0.104000516,0.000082969134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9263604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94879687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096110955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.096110955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14241642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69733703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215800789","doi":"","title":"Professor Raz, the Rule of Law, and the Tobacco Act","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Legislation; Rule of law; Statutory interpretation; Damages; Charter; Interpretation (philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010100793155748654,"score_gpt":0.29329123498091764,"score_spread":0.283190441825169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215800789","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019379666,0.040522333,0.01151607,0.5129531,0.0017194542,0.00012495078,0.0003112185,0.00013265206,0.41334054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7541364,0.019351808,0.012291856,0.113529846,0.0022333357,0.00017148427,0.00013209665,0.00007528514,0.09807801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931306,0.0022861536,0.0002796431,0.0008460193,0.0023175813,0.0011399759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963108,0.0022807233,0.00041040257,0.0001860088,0.00061029004,0.00020190062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005462957,0.0003914825,0.0004967786,0.0010556072,0.008511955,0.007445479,0.0015626187,0.0097304415,0.0035867693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009914011,0.0003502576,0.000564215,0.0014975338,0.027267799,0.0043916567,0.002423172,0.012225049,0.0008718819],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035352912,0.0000028743275,0.000079286816,0.000010250251,0.0000013607124,0.00003278407,0.00058512244,0.000069017486,0.00002978293,0.99024934,0.0073274216,0.0016093309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039509476,0.000026631762,0.00077334663,0.00017469276,0.000015733749,0.0001188903,0.00082403736,0.000498555,0.00022049312,0.66400576,0.33326194,0.000040380277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22657336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18775983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22657336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013594889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021670623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45050907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2217600237","doi":"","title":"St. John's School of Law - 2013 Commencement Exercises","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01733951531488466,"score_gpt":0.25310786484930686,"score_spread":0.23576834953442222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2217600237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0093220975,0.0010736788,0.002190388,0.017896598,0.0013749046,0.00017762267,0.000900472,0.00034379994,0.9667204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07165652,0.00063004595,0.002182961,0.0022439873,0.00034556742,0.00010689805,0.00031321315,0.00012883647,0.9223921],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753344,0.000341203,0.000085014,0.00027615577,0.0012424351,0.00052168005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954253,0.0013801465,0.000089935245,0.0003726042,0.0018380284,0.0008940578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004289216,0.00045564154,0.00047127836,0.0013582077,0.007502637,0.005526185,0.0016694552,0.003445749,0.10625455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0110290125,0.00046976237,0.0005121827,0.0010235723,0.0016072378,0.0028146144,0.0028577144,0.005000569,0.017109966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009775678,0.00022153904,0.0009330473,0.00008404456,0.000010941983,0.00030601933,0.0014620962,0.0006614451,0.0005477891,0.27891338,0.64765435,0.06910765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004200393,0.000050671624,0.0039411876,0.00018214433,0.000015506781,0.00007998365,0.00084917335,0.000840937,0.0017815232,0.04140179,0.9507712,0.000043831606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057294853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1685717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10625455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007600548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076195695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3554569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2219252445","doi":"","title":"Mistake, Forged Cheques and Unjust Enrichment: Three Cheers for B.M.P. Global","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Unjust enrichment; Business; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Restitution","score_opus":0.03034953253617476,"score_gpt":0.32777009429423465,"score_spread":0.29742056175805986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2219252445","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1100433,0.008458007,0.002464662,0.741526,0.0013012168,0.000056031953,0.00006391401,0.000057749545,0.13602917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85020286,0.0032193824,0.0021302574,0.090289466,0.0004654814,0.000072429946,0.000033396973,0.00010313563,0.053483568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997071,0.0010657855,0.000084437954,0.0002898175,0.00061372505,0.0008752824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99460185,0.0023314701,0.00047037203,0.00051893474,0.0007876344,0.0012897709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050158473,0.0004654881,0.0005352385,0.0006841821,0.01765603,0.0075562433,0.0013819826,0.0147576695,0.0069780317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012526788,0.00029436243,0.0005490999,0.00071417604,0.02364891,0.010843686,0.0071857553,0.014756207,0.0008619517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113878705,0.0002254147,0.008907298,0.00010967536,0.000027010567,0.002530849,0.0789921,0.00019953883,0.00031895062,0.675907,0.17738062,0.055287655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061808874,0.00011153539,0.014127151,0.0007327901,0.000059035727,0.0031315123,0.15805794,0.00089749496,0.000919289,0.46205568,0.35968772,0.00015805368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011179765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03888164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01765603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005304632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076384535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03848797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2220265832","doi":"","title":"\"Purely Personal and Philosophical\": Gov. Winthrop Rockefeller's Death Sentence Commutations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Arkansas Historical Quarterly","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Power (physics); Prison; Federalist; Economic Justice; Life imprisonment; State (computer science); Punishment (psychology); Governor; Barbarism; Repentance; Political science; Imprisonment; Psychology; Philosophy; Civilization; Theology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0664991382152904,"score_gpt":0.2993760663006863,"score_spread":0.2328769280853959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2220265832","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009802983,0.022607196,0.00021000445,0.7386193,0.013660792,0.00006127176,0.00035492843,0.0001335412,0.21454997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05582055,0.0055820206,0.00017653486,0.23954096,0.0028970246,0.00015247062,0.0001178522,0.00009328781,0.6956193],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832636,0.00031356094,0.000045805977,0.00028323708,0.00032150114,0.0007096277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865866,0.00046814908,0.00006045927,0.000060504033,0.00023530744,0.00051688385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013760928,0.0004851824,0.00033649566,0.0005727382,0.025574131,0.0060638124,0.00122376,0.010480478,0.024106473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004052555,0.0005306602,0.00028263326,0.00048756914,0.0034015889,0.0030929672,0.0028723762,0.013936694,0.004380566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014788547,0.000018958453,0.0004450973,0.000024351446,0.0000018120523,0.0003522692,0.0019653584,0.000013288657,0.00006425806,0.011963746,0.9764158,0.008720145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076223364,0.000027846378,0.0034872454,0.00020828415,0.0000030459194,0.00015952103,0.006433344,0.000023508563,0.000082016326,0.0013061864,0.9882329,0.000028608049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23571557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49707913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23571557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055918545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009147684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46868712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2225597701","doi":"","title":"Looking for Cover: A Public Choice Critique of the Canadian Debit Card Code","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Enforcement; Cover (algebra); Debit card; Consumer protection; Law and economics; Dispute resolution; Business; Political science; Law; Public administration; Economics; Credit card; Payment; Finance; Engineering","score_opus":0.03345973358785123,"score_gpt":0.2756080004714551,"score_spread":0.24214826688360389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2225597701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059715215,0.0048775016,0.018058399,0.32600728,0.00041645445,0.00010363396,0.0003400403,0.00009538343,0.59038615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95159835,0.0014472328,0.0027536547,0.018606698,0.000264962,0.000058047666,0.000053698626,0.00004304761,0.025174255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98682654,0.0020381722,0.00017966345,0.0010455174,0.006832825,0.003077306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98942965,0.005444507,0.00052655605,0.0005414369,0.0033363756,0.0007215149],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075534335,0.00042752957,0.000559824,0.0030462197,0.020465303,0.0106839,0.0028632027,0.0075945044,0.0046976563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016421745,0.00039359604,0.00065704784,0.0033847275,0.038474012,0.0042232713,0.0028904893,0.0071199182,0.0003106644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005466364,0.0000038264143,0.00023246254,0.000009945297,0.0000019739923,0.000020442887,0.001983252,0.00018392109,0.00002244191,0.99159825,0.003337466,0.0026006058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095718024,0.00003062248,0.006360733,0.00037318075,0.00006099377,0.00008364621,0.008979139,0.0032639315,0.00060597336,0.659612,0.32040405,0.00012996909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9495799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9339294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0988125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0988125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09537522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7169382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2233854638","doi":"","title":"'I Didn't Mean it that Way!': Racial Discrimination as Negligence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Redress; Harm; Racism; Cause of action; Jurisdiction; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Contributory negligence; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.01885133627578977,"score_gpt":0.31370049500736785,"score_spread":0.2948491587315781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2233854638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10761419,0.008154529,0.028938139,0.29313883,0.0017029124,0.00012722996,0.0000473473,0.000053935113,0.5602229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9244506,0.0010881796,0.0034259758,0.036297087,0.0003219051,0.0000727295,0.000011009442,0.000020592171,0.034311853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918321,0.0041572596,0.00019120176,0.0007927133,0.0017350352,0.001291802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99637634,0.0021726668,0.00044573043,0.00025682754,0.00047548686,0.00027287236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007561484,0.000282221,0.00029272103,0.0007776686,0.0112103745,0.0050111213,0.0012843283,0.008391853,0.0034519648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011130832,0.00021638017,0.0004311323,0.00046374885,0.037443645,0.005746502,0.004296835,0.0062362775,0.00048847066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003897746,0.00000929262,0.0006509338,0.000012411134,0.0000021341782,0.00018152532,0.016043399,0.00006486221,0.000069714195,0.97604764,0.003552933,0.003361311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021701298,0.0000834152,0.0043189996,0.00040367592,0.000020798625,0.0010092562,0.027403856,0.0010281281,0.00060207536,0.6760339,0.28901008,0.000064200845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027295543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026149917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027295543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004768546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061300136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054273307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2233951085","doi":"","title":"Understanding the Legal Client’s Best Interests: Lessons from Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Comprehensive Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Therapeutic jurisprudence; Best practice; Jurisprudence; Legal ethics; Political science; Economic Justice; Best interests; Law; Legal profession; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.08505117815841898,"score_gpt":0.34161581436623745,"score_spread":0.25656463620781844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2233951085","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024194412,0.08155301,0.041949816,0.53282845,0.0014714458,0.00013299618,0.00003029428,0.000080475475,0.31775916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87075055,0.033861708,0.013611368,0.066635475,0.0021769507,0.0003284846,0.00004244354,0.00014735332,0.012445619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9722539,0.01786854,0.00077475247,0.001941039,0.0041189687,0.0030427687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95007163,0.04147823,0.0014698829,0.001920421,0.0024127527,0.0026471245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038351998,0.0010124882,0.002263484,0.0044326773,0.018512856,0.02475268,0.0058292234,0.021751631,0.0040446566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036889564,0.0010109195,0.0012356967,0.0028124938,0.169172,0.03864984,0.017515767,0.03215697,0.00082206825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060211946,0.000038177877,0.00012328637,0.000064154505,0.0000044310455,0.00016179125,0.018795915,0.00016090788,0.000015561294,0.9713696,0.0023420232,0.00691812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012809113,0.00001224611,0.00009805988,0.0003419716,0.000003499827,0.00012020678,0.007724346,0.00029545935,0.0000363636,0.97066575,0.020676393,0.000012825224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022672258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023106668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038351998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0290031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0331677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21043319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2234269269","doi":"","title":"An Obvious ‘Comity of Errors’: Canadian Federal Court of Appeal Admonishes Motives of Applications Judge, While Agreeing with the Result","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comity; Appeal; Notice; Jurisprudence; Law; Order (exchange); Political science; Federal court; Supreme court; Business; Jurisdiction","score_opus":0.012548161888682005,"score_gpt":0.27087271868717516,"score_spread":0.25832455679849314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2234269269","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022793261,0.0014076743,0.006415255,0.70726347,0.004505043,0.00016879682,0.00038360097,0.00020329196,0.25685963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4558124,0.0007428651,0.0043977094,0.40238756,0.0016477765,0.00013344381,0.00014351164,0.00018523692,0.13454957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9603125,0.0050986195,0.0016331078,0.0054623364,0.018371632,0.009121749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96529895,0.014128986,0.0009647949,0.001909642,0.01524255,0.0024551149],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02476421,0.0006121685,0.00073331356,0.0022313867,0.031043043,0.0141443,0.0044766897,0.029963642,0.0069405413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08184644,0.000955173,0.0010559527,0.0022725826,0.01858078,0.006178199,0.0042473064,0.029932184,0.0014855107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046272547,0.000019580028,0.0013876286,0.000043952714,0.000023487923,0.0007342179,0.010499427,0.00015433379,0.0005692117,0.7036142,0.27444184,0.008465917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067337205,0.00004028388,0.0040893955,0.00039176177,0.000118076605,0.00043227922,0.008446018,0.0016749837,0.0020844722,0.114486486,0.8678538,0.00031498956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8104005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.870168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047130004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09193918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38143218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2237559586","doi":"","title":"The Unbearable License of Being the Executive: A Response to Stacey's Permanent Environmental Emergency","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"License; Business; Emergency response; Environmental law; Law; Law and economics; Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Economics; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.0186498126633165,"score_gpt":0.2831260062512624,"score_spread":0.2644761935879459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2237559586","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06615564,0.0035848857,0.0026215832,0.7410078,0.0028878173,0.000056458,0.00004932086,0.00009917309,0.18353726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69390905,0.0020865127,0.0009624884,0.22105579,0.00085071044,0.00007533316,0.000025421534,0.00009424173,0.080940515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942239,0.002087286,0.000163565,0.00051304064,0.0009766711,0.0020355321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945956,0.0029967432,0.0004998667,0.0002181298,0.0007093845,0.0009803618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005321253,0.00024889983,0.00033665355,0.00063676934,0.022822898,0.007596233,0.0025031536,0.01498972,0.0066781044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01481536,0.0002966359,0.000421114,0.00052163156,0.012453799,0.004199421,0.0077410517,0.02146695,0.0006940501],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031958432,0.00006343383,0.0014462996,0.00005111855,0.0000093816325,0.0035466834,0.030419037,0.00046169653,0.00044740134,0.6551758,0.29621577,0.012131402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041227733,0.00006132425,0.0028264227,0.00030760624,0.000016561095,0.0009796584,0.05855373,0.0009967346,0.00065202056,0.090548545,0.84491765,0.00009840363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060928714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12989716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060928714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006756327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01308494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12114811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2242865105","doi":"","title":"Great Strides in Section 9 Jurisprudence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Arbitrariness; Jurisprudence; Section (typography); Law; Doctrine; Discretion; Political science; Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.017257866464203964,"score_gpt":0.29136850088250155,"score_spread":0.2741106344182976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2242865105","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017863408,0.015137441,0.013530301,0.6437062,0.006921252,0.00004778082,0.000044361386,0.00013226393,0.30261695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48447996,0.008688553,0.013053479,0.41707098,0.008256455,0.00020083986,0.00008933642,0.00028099492,0.06787927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95295906,0.02001995,0.002304024,0.0072008064,0.014067638,0.0034485226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9496124,0.037943475,0.0013660787,0.0029239,0.005468089,0.0026859557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049062576,0.00043935745,0.0009610966,0.0012184185,0.009180846,0.015446502,0.004277672,0.018579418,0.004449461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045894902,0.0008125892,0.0011269276,0.0008753242,0.04232115,0.011551495,0.010870361,0.036088802,0.0016502173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046994546,0.000010155363,0.0001127038,0.000021756807,0.0000029339074,0.00005652136,0.0031285838,0.000079561694,0.000082515246,0.9800996,0.012342504,0.004058376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017147915,0.000043864893,0.0005447658,0.00036694255,0.000008147244,0.00016752548,0.0027777043,0.00034578436,0.00022650743,0.63498,0.360468,0.00005358236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011871795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013192034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049062576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010879783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013607811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25947082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246056922","doi":"","title":"Empirical Data on S. 24(2) Under R. v. Grant","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Econometrics; Economics","score_opus":0.12420499618619098,"score_gpt":0.35387194108754516,"score_spread":0.2296669449013542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2246056922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4294182,0.0011693469,0.00300732,0.0135057,0.0005308822,0.00074547215,0.14221102,0.00047776528,0.4089343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7151572,0.0014369233,0.0024369245,0.004892894,0.00045114564,0.0011905743,0.06911865,0.00027182396,0.20504385],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99556667,0.000680572,0.00028075094,0.00046292224,0.0018147307,0.0011942612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9701821,0.013529721,0.003666182,0.0023721452,0.008646429,0.0016034534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040831454,0.0004379122,0.0006233396,0.004169997,0.003685709,0.002074018,0.0014792582,0.0021748398,0.053556167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021767598,0.00037709504,0.0003776975,0.00646575,0.0010882065,0.0011872776,0.0011091268,0.0033419793,0.019862354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006426704,0.00094355183,0.07026542,0.00044087414,0.00012507572,0.00083068165,0.00320408,0.0012490033,0.0018943803,0.120647006,0.74516964,0.054587703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034224187,0.00039804057,0.26122704,0.0002998176,0.00019871636,0.0007073146,0.0060441284,0.0019666327,0.006728305,0.022286773,0.69966084,0.0001401543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056554966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08467047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.943445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017716612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005296968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17916328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2247076484","doi":"","title":"What's wrong with Canada's animal cruelty laws? : Bill C-50, a touchstone for change.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cruelty; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03904586659535517,"score_gpt":0.3254996254135036,"score_spread":0.2864537588181484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2247076484","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008998657,0.010803538,0.001086929,0.88947195,0.0023783136,0.00004329539,0.00020605476,0.00005215448,0.08695916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25452858,0.010602254,0.0036707616,0.62736785,0.00086577656,0.0000691072,0.00019449381,0.000117513155,0.102583736],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98648226,0.001408502,0.00032152177,0.0010979414,0.007633055,0.0030567106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858504,0.0031787145,0.00052873616,0.00050368055,0.0074960953,0.00244241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010234822,0.0003551597,0.00045226715,0.0011770384,0.024903502,0.014959946,0.0029526073,0.015196147,0.004635642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029033102,0.00047455786,0.0004855426,0.001836852,0.030935165,0.0052607674,0.0025371523,0.014818535,0.00084181526],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002467732,0.000034731467,0.0028771332,0.00008323911,0.000018736007,0.00025672285,0.013123193,0.00016801474,0.00042049956,0.43573228,0.51613224,0.03112851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023353092,0.000019372637,0.008166993,0.0005433276,0.000038386406,0.00009845652,0.016874515,0.00021404051,0.00037248604,0.04135752,0.93217134,0.000120125405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9836038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9882063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084846586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.084846586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24759571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.615608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W225236535","doi":"","title":"Canadian Price-Fixing Class Actions: The Supreme Court of Canada Gives the Green Light to Indirect Purchaser Claims","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Plaintiff; Damages; Class action; Legislation; Certiorari; Political science; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.01908005545827297,"score_gpt":0.25304099785432815,"score_spread":0.2339609423960552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W225236535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050781745,0.0047315247,0.0037430476,0.10511137,0.0028667774,0.00043405767,0.002789399,0.0003252852,0.82921684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5459915,0.004696866,0.004356599,0.1637672,0.0018013334,0.00035595708,0.0013335102,0.00028054227,0.2774165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9798305,0.00070814614,0.0005044293,0.0020306788,0.010660355,0.006265949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98752975,0.0032611112,0.00038116451,0.0008195809,0.006317291,0.0016911105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073987017,0.0010300144,0.0010802189,0.002620065,0.03140074,0.01560456,0.0059849042,0.02367019,0.01350337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022409715,0.0014860238,0.001682704,0.003179153,0.0077967457,0.0026308456,0.0045791734,0.02006514,0.0017326354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009112727,0.00006443823,0.004820807,0.000099787416,0.000070333794,0.0015928074,0.002974455,0.00084963907,0.0010047012,0.6883255,0.2820453,0.018061018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002361513,0.00006515004,0.011021954,0.00073980395,0.00040232533,0.00036231923,0.0021660938,0.0026494055,0.002143531,0.056985274,0.92282706,0.00040087456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9799759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99054986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08482594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08482594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19327073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61545813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252996208","doi":"","title":"'Juice Formulation is Not Rocket Science' and Other Observations: Cadbury Schweppes Inc. v. FBI Foods Ltd.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Rocket (weapon); Business; Aeronautics; Agricultural science; Environmental science; Engineering","score_opus":0.025466864391134898,"score_gpt":0.2995919398515941,"score_spread":0.2741250754604592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252996208","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05407317,0.009793424,0.0025375271,0.49614105,0.0026523103,0.0002007087,0.0012681442,0.00028269435,0.43305102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28436998,0.0037041185,0.0017451071,0.46346217,0.0008653613,0.00022685475,0.00029668276,0.00009643566,0.24523336],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968629,0.00044772125,0.00013393775,0.00064731046,0.0011801927,0.00072803994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972072,0.001595783,0.00020351794,0.00011481998,0.00074290787,0.00013576171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035921498,0.00074671925,0.0003688304,0.00094361074,0.014459473,0.0053657233,0.0026781312,0.030554524,0.015313083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009119526,0.0008353613,0.0007218661,0.0008430977,0.0053449264,0.006204293,0.0018201233,0.0113258995,0.002569774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000163384,0.000094261195,0.002291796,0.00023843526,0.000026415175,0.0011605211,0.011171713,0.00015803133,0.0012281217,0.26677856,0.7039582,0.012730621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001063287,0.00015186299,0.008814283,0.00038687148,0.000079921214,0.00065747986,0.009230561,0.00034669842,0.0051737144,0.02681774,0.9480352,0.00019943477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18572403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34804764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18572403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053368458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008745834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.369286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253606702","doi":"","title":"Regulated Conduct and the Competition Act","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Competition (biology); Subject (documents); Political science; Law and economics; Business; Public relations; Economics; Computer science; Biology; Library science; Ecology","score_opus":0.052357448705167835,"score_gpt":0.34681847559608364,"score_spread":0.2944610268909158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253606702","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009486563,0.005916351,0.004819255,0.03062744,0.00025990405,0.000069993,0.00029427125,0.000041278625,0.948485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70676386,0.0061475476,0.004495275,0.021302095,0.000628312,0.00031593887,0.0003536863,0.00007695333,0.2599163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98743314,0.003517339,0.000346186,0.0009946291,0.005885496,0.0018232206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940538,0.0022899008,0.00067325524,0.0006083541,0.0018266616,0.00054806855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053261844,0.00034465975,0.0004099063,0.0016675792,0.006384393,0.010680131,0.0009939891,0.008133194,0.010720841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011249757,0.00030541298,0.0005563314,0.0021870492,0.019643333,0.0028809411,0.0027568475,0.005069812,0.0021539694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036008341,0.0000042576794,0.00007940654,0.00000704458,0.0000016075861,0.00002527264,0.00026851002,0.0001091151,0.000034564364,0.9913617,0.0065429546,0.0015620241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028918563,0.000027364145,0.003012013,0.00032104738,0.000015405065,0.00011303034,0.00089777634,0.0010226116,0.0001653702,0.6671597,0.327191,0.00004593702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31130007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27384794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31130007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018199284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03816006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61897624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254003184","doi":"","title":"R. v. Khadr : Did Prime Minister Harper Commit a Contempt of Court?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contempt; Prime minister; Commit; Irony; Law; Political science; Politics; Prime (order theory); Government (linguistics); Philosophy","score_opus":0.03263190839115979,"score_gpt":0.3082248196504549,"score_spread":0.2755929112592951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254003184","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07589771,0.006324289,0.0012656921,0.75342256,0.0023864894,0.000055096756,0.00012672441,0.00008036854,0.16044113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6208898,0.0021661457,0.0005030633,0.30408654,0.0009428085,0.000029040462,0.000025852189,0.00004152569,0.07131524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738914,0.0007500712,0.00006899401,0.000429494,0.00046976682,0.0008925624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99620914,0.0025091404,0.00026582298,0.00011758647,0.0005227099,0.00037572233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004110111,0.00021163035,0.00036005676,0.00039591925,0.013591181,0.0055194017,0.0011725946,0.011826031,0.0051584947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017269624,0.00040648744,0.00030073617,0.0005724061,0.00513644,0.0031881265,0.0015281608,0.010582903,0.0010576965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012433805,0.000034099732,0.0046499814,0.00007902563,0.000022932636,0.0030418134,0.018203031,0.0002144363,0.0006963689,0.58491117,0.3703995,0.017623287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006436149,0.00014168302,0.010889145,0.00034643782,0.00005968067,0.0017933564,0.029360149,0.0010540164,0.0024381224,0.10012462,0.85354877,0.00017967242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12983905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17578392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87016094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069225533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009508163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2581666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255864694","doi":"","title":"A Fundamental Right of the Monied to 'Buy Out Of' Universal Health Care Program Restrictions Versus the Moral Claim of Everyone Else to Decent Health Care: An Unremitting Paradox of Health Care Reform?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Government (linguistics); Supreme court; Right to health; Law; Constitutional right; Substantive due process; Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Public administration; Medicaid; Economics","score_opus":0.02374570358356102,"score_gpt":0.3582294755513623,"score_spread":0.33448377196780127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255864694","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020065822,0.0044342675,0.0082259225,0.83507675,0.0008917623,0.000025299545,0.00010119818,0.000048471957,0.13113052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77702194,0.003162066,0.0039728065,0.19416745,0.0024113588,0.00010302046,0.00006368036,0.00006667271,0.01903092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98815155,0.005089639,0.00031821348,0.0018274797,0.0023399994,0.0022732099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895717,0.0053607654,0.0008264608,0.001973216,0.001041322,0.001226569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017904108,0.00036017076,0.0011742102,0.000749093,0.0066190665,0.012278374,0.0025473346,0.01529522,0.0064017917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017572338,0.0004915314,0.00082749897,0.0006850525,0.074917465,0.018436827,0.006620782,0.023460802,0.0009139747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008980548,0.000017886357,0.00006868158,0.000013116362,0.0000033378992,0.00001440012,0.00056159566,0.000067425004,0.000093609546,0.9932381,0.003511855,0.0024009806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052435393,0.000027683576,0.0003951591,0.000117627766,0.000009544742,0.000042254585,0.00095549977,0.00032494395,0.0002327378,0.9371865,0.06062901,0.00002660225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03030694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026208851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03030694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013249589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022832138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096132934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256778810","doi":"","title":"The Reach of Patent Law and Institutional Competence","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Libertarianism; Patent troll; Law and economics; Statutory interpretation; Normative; Utilitarianism; Political science; Law; Competence (human resources); Statutory law; Legislature; Intellectual property; Patent law; Economics","score_opus":0.016907777604288205,"score_gpt":0.2626571450379325,"score_spread":0.2457493674336443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256778810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049208604,0.011506682,0.063566275,0.079548545,0.00022948852,0.00009488908,0.000109775116,0.00021122207,0.7955244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771403,0.0028312223,0.0062979986,0.0036833105,0.0005865486,0.00013926066,0.000056967056,0.00006706077,0.009197367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97955245,0.007386835,0.0014546262,0.0041685933,0.005591315,0.0018462578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.930673,0.047795925,0.0053680195,0.0075854477,0.0049985414,0.0035790976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034512814,0.00059183215,0.0014749855,0.0065787616,0.006542404,0.023528265,0.0032261545,0.011097151,0.0072091226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063838236,0.0007609033,0.0013438124,0.00264158,0.072679214,0.0321889,0.01832885,0.012070962,0.0014097965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002435039,0.0000058259275,0.000083849,0.000015398376,0.000003401505,0.00001623086,0.00036664066,0.00014240388,0.000041519666,0.99738353,0.00013598878,0.0018027308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010925136,0.000010595268,0.00013955744,0.000078382705,0.000005101912,0.000030282059,0.00022874202,0.00018694965,0.000079151454,0.9921989,0.007023293,0.000008185468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027947156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001350068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034512814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0087961955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009343709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18252343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258265011","doi":"","title":"Review of Sexual Science and the Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Speculation; Law; Psychology; Criminal law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.015712209525683193,"score_gpt":0.2923488644332383,"score_spread":0.2766366549075551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258265011","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012495287,0.9789547,0.00012520934,0.007494049,0.003935698,0.0000040598748,0.00003206843,0.0000061723777,0.009323071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027989862,0.9756998,0.00017912347,0.007119732,0.0057601235,0.000011863678,0.00009969837,0.000010046858,0.0083206985],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883074,0.00029799444,0.00010916782,0.0001000062,0.00056058634,0.00010149653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99654216,0.0020208391,0.0002874203,0.00009133958,0.0008238122,0.00023439528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011033057,0.0004842745,0.0008393575,0.006188548,0.000979249,0.0029557354,0.00089839415,0.0017715836,0.012389313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005648662,0.00033055776,0.0004851956,0.008756929,0.0024532895,0.0024867626,0.0011481631,0.0024393233,0.003527871],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002556248,0.000032495656,0.00037798597,0.004470485,0.00004389715,0.00013512226,0.00029899323,0.0001620586,0.00012593578,0.03295587,0.69076663,0.27060494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029454484,0.000009958138,0.0008247816,0.0031194913,0.000009976304,0.00022468713,0.00015010386,0.00002247365,0.000020435835,0.0045142914,0.9910954,0.000005494515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057556718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013348647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012389313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023605186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063454723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04144633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258680811","doi":"10.82308/23794","title":"Taxing charities, imposer les organismes de bienfaisance : harmonization and dissonance in Canadian charity law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive dissonance; Law; Political science; Harmonization; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.014510330160765725,"score_gpt":0.2407778839126342,"score_spread":0.22626755375186847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258680811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11936305,0.0056205373,0.0041104928,0.07092624,0.0003918048,0.000116692594,0.0001673913,0.000066403125,0.7992373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92223793,0.0016853537,0.0017496533,0.00610118,0.00006066252,0.000031297404,0.0000427618,0.000029481549,0.0680616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99588877,0.0007673209,0.00009980583,0.000373865,0.0015004821,0.001369759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970739,0.0010515752,0.00017875891,0.00012856245,0.0011370081,0.000430213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033996191,0.00021020956,0.00018282938,0.0015603267,0.025965292,0.00945723,0.0015985309,0.002358323,0.00555835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007758304,0.00030147855,0.0002100144,0.0020278601,0.02348853,0.0023891837,0.0029145402,0.003515612,0.00027349993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000088682655,0.000009054568,0.0012074319,0.000021783842,0.000002480985,0.00013036122,0.014536926,0.00022935886,0.00014484781,0.963485,0.012566912,0.0076569854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006023891,0.000027405496,0.030416887,0.00042424552,0.000053978343,0.00026473086,0.0747811,0.0026585332,0.001047763,0.20370021,0.68639165,0.00017333483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9895629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99553066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13594535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13594535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17538851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98635715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258721558","doi":"","title":"Structure and Relationship in American Federalism: Foundations, Consequences, and \"Basic Principles\" Revisited","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Federalism; Political science; Law and economics; Sovereignty; State (computer science); Politics; Separation of powers; Enumerated powers; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Law; Public administration; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07735576547804769,"score_gpt":0.34149023505342135,"score_spread":0.2641344695753737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258721558","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1226181,0.011052833,0.098244436,0.09042248,0.00052312925,0.00015977024,0.00019184976,0.00016398923,0.67662346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805563,0.0014191985,0.0088654915,0.00200036,0.00026889011,0.00015035098,0.00004074287,0.000026417145,0.006672346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962728,0.0017255952,0.0001290995,0.0005992962,0.0007825163,0.00049063656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971334,0.0014999601,0.00044353455,0.000328043,0.00041905235,0.00017607909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049036485,0.000188608,0.0005239894,0.0029020829,0.0062423595,0.0071131694,0.001360827,0.003287186,0.0053525777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009109792,0.00038416937,0.0006539648,0.0033317492,0.03524113,0.006611433,0.0033561112,0.004410442,0.0003462295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010041506,0.0000016218409,0.00007480327,0.0000025497432,6.0261596e-7,0.0000030881447,0.00024208424,0.00005525582,0.000006007136,0.99846256,0.00016524353,0.000985088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000676499,0.000004022683,0.0005557898,0.000021538948,0.0000027557917,0.000014164788,0.0001982915,0.00035900096,0.000027374472,0.99164635,0.0071604834,0.0000033930064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012416486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015124866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012416486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01043383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006239615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075703144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258825645","doi":"","title":"Talking Trash with the Supreme Court of Canada: The Reasonable Expectation of PrivacyUnder the Charter","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.006551949007729256,"score_gpt":0.22950072105639718,"score_spread":0.22294877204866792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258825645","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18005443,0.002729214,0.0034077133,0.556455,0.0006282534,0.00008507936,0.00033772737,0.000042147392,0.25626042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95220006,0.0006107371,0.00055972516,0.030689703,0.00023492202,0.000024309096,0.00003254136,0.0000321554,0.015615833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9775261,0.006352475,0.00042804188,0.0020561134,0.005650078,0.0079872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9641093,0.021104032,0.0021181353,0.0014063839,0.007641467,0.0036205365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017238706,0.00042149454,0.0010022531,0.0012819628,0.043954764,0.022148592,0.0036530418,0.024836022,0.011996833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07384078,0.00077125867,0.0007058558,0.0022136075,0.03140312,0.0093840705,0.0054271417,0.02796189,0.0005242152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013658383,0.000083726045,0.0047138277,0.0000437958,0.000040860265,0.00083467574,0.024960285,0.0010192024,0.00020598894,0.8988922,0.059870947,0.009197976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020008112,0.0000798892,0.019363971,0.00049445004,0.00019951675,0.00027267376,0.072444335,0.005750188,0.0009549794,0.7419564,0.15782149,0.0004619943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9639098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97762454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08605627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08605627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20761776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6243849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259052511","doi":"","title":"Role of the Media and Public Perceptions, The Proceedings of the Canada-United States Law Institute Conference on Multiple Actors in Canada-U.S. Relations: The Role of the Media and Public Perceptions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Media relations; Perception; Media coverage; Media studies; Law; Public relations; Public administration; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.016411777471255936,"score_gpt":0.22173814889375243,"score_spread":0.2053263714224965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259052511","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3116369,0.02467016,0.0012694448,0.33295304,0.00063136086,0.00007302287,0.0006774218,0.000030165285,0.3280586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820118,0.0045998404,0.00026057256,0.0049342895,0.00019406446,0.00001753809,0.0000390685,0.00001722244,0.00792548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99414766,0.0021418894,0.00010967205,0.00030026407,0.002334997,0.0009655113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9704869,0.021608483,0.0019963072,0.0003100396,0.003789381,0.0018088635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0103395,0.000356511,0.00033380918,0.004184024,0.015073768,0.03326263,0.0011312023,0.0037305646,0.0061396775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025058713,0.00031665058,0.0003589833,0.004418158,0.017357104,0.008392445,0.0031267474,0.004143779,0.00026294007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043345246,0.0002322139,0.0723035,0.00040348497,0.00020030235,0.0008176179,0.17777896,0.0012220726,0.00075439597,0.59201515,0.08509518,0.06874372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085893,0.00006807311,0.17923574,0.0015029418,0.000377035,0.00015368636,0.43989724,0.0020571665,0.0017781472,0.104242414,0.2703515,0.0002500895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7519379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.879401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24806207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039158158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04335965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4990459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259606356","doi":"","title":"Critique: A Historian Said Terra Nullius Was An Invention - I'm a Blackfella Lawyer Who Has Serious Concerns about His Lack of Understanding and Knowledge of the Common Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NOVA (University of Newcastle, Australia)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3993850435462904,"score_gpt":0.38363869333881156,"score_spread":0.015746350207478832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259606356","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040225446,0.0028922022,0.00023705406,0.9889079,0.0036794047,0.000006253505,0.000013058456,0.000013515675,0.0038483213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03250595,0.00543921,0.0008802366,0.915366,0.013955573,0.00006382633,0.000034226126,0.0001065769,0.03164835],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99182844,0.0038487166,0.00032621124,0.0015009618,0.0019872768,0.0005083943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9749658,0.015858017,0.0008594418,0.00073362247,0.0065079425,0.0010751847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009550847,0.0010951912,0.0010793883,0.0022175172,0.011303678,0.008671155,0.005079733,0.01940684,0.0072833006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040952127,0.0005202559,0.0008142612,0.0019148471,0.03110416,0.013052431,0.004820405,0.03345768,0.002304214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015139253,0.000009377737,0.00020143094,0.00012029689,0.000010840565,0.00016335945,0.0104780365,0.000080421945,0.00007892333,0.1461958,0.8379166,0.0047298013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014744405,0.0000073296183,0.00044106867,0.0005934568,0.000009691229,0.00023862533,0.011305004,0.00020607447,0.00015915303,0.062496293,0.9244955,0.00003301877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056538597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058842108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056538597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013298893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014028199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11241901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260043176","doi":"","title":"Role of the Media and Public Perceptions, The Proceedings of the Canada-United States Law Institute Conference on Multiple Actors in Canada-U.S. Relations: The Role of the Media and Public Perceptions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Media studies; Perception; Media relations; Law; Sociology; Public relations; Public administration; Psychology","score_opus":0.016411777471255936,"score_gpt":0.22173814889375243,"score_spread":0.2053263714224965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260043176","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3116369,0.02467016,0.0012694448,0.33295304,0.00063136086,0.00007302287,0.0006774218,0.000030165285,0.3280586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820118,0.0045998404,0.00026057256,0.0049342895,0.00019406446,0.00001753809,0.0000390685,0.00001722244,0.00792548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99414766,0.0021418894,0.00010967205,0.00030026407,0.002334997,0.0009655113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9704869,0.021608483,0.0019963072,0.0003100396,0.003789381,0.0018088635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0103395,0.000356511,0.00033380918,0.004184024,0.015073768,0.03326263,0.0011312023,0.0037305646,0.0061396775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025058713,0.00031665058,0.0003589833,0.004418158,0.017357104,0.008392445,0.0031267474,0.004143779,0.00026294007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043345246,0.0002322139,0.0723035,0.00040348497,0.00020030235,0.0008176179,0.17777896,0.0012220726,0.00075439597,0.59201515,0.08509518,0.06874372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085893,0.00006807311,0.17923574,0.0015029418,0.000377035,0.00015368636,0.43989724,0.0020571665,0.0017781472,0.104242414,0.2703515,0.0002500895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7519379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.879401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24806207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039158158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04335965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4990459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260876279","doi":"","title":"Canadian landmark case: L.C. and the Attorney General for Alberta v. Brian Joseph Mills.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Landmark; Law; Psychology; Political science; Cartography; Geography","score_opus":0.013626670997450008,"score_gpt":0.23267619651414828,"score_spread":0.21904952551669826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260876279","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023461206,0.016598694,0.0011231583,0.46286887,0.0043511465,0.00021137237,0.003421125,0.00033499493,0.4876294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.222453,0.0052523594,0.0013479376,0.110359564,0.0007224137,0.00008661972,0.0008702616,0.00011675272,0.65879107],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980526,0.00010592122,0.00003227717,0.00015612307,0.0009484034,0.0007047566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998092,0.00039158817,0.000059310518,0.000041869367,0.0010227512,0.0003924714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013002724,0.00060616265,0.0003345668,0.0011914569,0.019200632,0.0043896637,0.002387943,0.011507596,0.025315091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005199888,0.0005426449,0.00051994674,0.0019139368,0.0023433364,0.0014164156,0.0013038886,0.006712305,0.0023234356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005544212,0.000014654319,0.0014034779,0.000047730962,0.000011321475,0.0004190792,0.00075770204,0.000105086816,0.00024649696,0.044291407,0.94412476,0.008522934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092303315,0.000027599905,0.019256433,0.00027833134,0.00010089235,0.00031796077,0.0036364002,0.0005179557,0.0009039332,0.009518204,0.9652039,0.00014615005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9821827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047276378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047276378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.098762915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34301573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261498436","doi":"10.11575/prism/29090","title":"Costs Decision: Gadd v. Director, Central Region, Regional Services, Alberta Environment re: Cardinal River Coals Ltd.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Geography","score_opus":0.026302124616388967,"score_gpt":0.2894077733649567,"score_spread":0.26310564874856773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261498436","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014898704,0.004855587,0.0007830525,0.35832182,0.004668192,0.000191914,0.0022606798,0.00032042718,0.6136996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11772371,0.0013527288,0.00064978405,0.15407595,0.000885863,0.00007308955,0.0005705625,0.00009655331,0.72457176],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981665,0.0001687352,0.00005589762,0.00019011289,0.00093543384,0.0004834047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99724436,0.0006796507,0.00006876147,0.00008279366,0.0014129559,0.0005115513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017359392,0.0007627051,0.00040499814,0.0011058178,0.008627465,0.0052079693,0.0020595952,0.014270961,0.045394767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007416783,0.00079122686,0.0004442961,0.00094501965,0.0018314377,0.0021458738,0.0013899091,0.0066770324,0.0052449135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046089,0.000019024044,0.0010490248,0.00003233298,0.000007961266,0.00016523658,0.0002947462,0.00010353839,0.0002521908,0.026384618,0.9646976,0.0069476203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077906945,0.000031760545,0.009025332,0.00014784111,0.00005805542,0.00015180283,0.0012887014,0.0005075485,0.0007965765,0.006640623,0.9811988,0.000074942815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66245246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8820229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33754754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015600994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041589316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67907083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262682471","doi":"","title":"The First Issue About Bills of Rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Business; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.004868257513415156,"score_gpt":0.25406772215056356,"score_spread":0.2491994646371484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262682471","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029832427,0.0043651634,0.0027848172,0.8342037,0.023575475,0.000028974891,0.00038700373,0.000055756474,0.13161582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10661414,0.004031278,0.003156218,0.6984366,0.067511335,0.0001662544,0.00035038686,0.00037389263,0.119359784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873704,0.003265215,0.00083097303,0.0018388979,0.005288932,0.0014056123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95334214,0.035936605,0.001659185,0.003463656,0.004521459,0.0010770428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011258921,0.0004940397,0.0014593042,0.001587491,0.0064034085,0.012469542,0.0035180568,0.042141482,0.027253069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08484311,0.00082492107,0.0016949058,0.0018936528,0.009455287,0.017322183,0.0027183355,0.038135137,0.004979767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021476473,0.000020705966,0.00019134654,0.00005173088,0.000013069392,0.00007693941,0.0004227178,0.000057258032,0.000083136285,0.72858953,0.2644819,0.005990167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043857202,0.00003022275,0.0011130413,0.00036822652,0.000036713045,0.00022563066,0.0005377534,0.00033106087,0.00038785007,0.28969535,0.7071728,0.000057555157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006483402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006595287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042141482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039078607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004237201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09117055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262710151","doi":"","title":"CAN INSURANCE LAW ACCOMODATE THE UNCERTAINTY ASSOCIATED WITH PRELIMINARY GENETIC INFORMATION","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Insurance law; Flexibility (engineering); Context (archaeology); Actuarial science; Argument (complex analysis); Insurance policy; Interpretation (philosophy); Business; Casualty insurance; Key person insurance; Genetic testing; General insurance; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.006355884415096602,"score_gpt":0.2306101609030274,"score_spread":0.2242542764879308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262710151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18378967,0.0022707044,0.24147668,0.20736188,0.0007793802,0.0005410548,0.00030475957,0.00034121232,0.3631347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9719505,0.00041342626,0.012340445,0.010457216,0.00062800135,0.00010907877,0.000029135963,0.00003664212,0.004035613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96254706,0.013686051,0.0019242532,0.0041950466,0.011125571,0.0065220306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89505905,0.075070985,0.010749007,0.008977047,0.008265296,0.0018786718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.068645336,0.00053335365,0.0010934497,0.0024140244,0.004807911,0.009913249,0.0027653964,0.0177509,0.003979296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14638488,0.00085573475,0.0013334772,0.0012911938,0.023465067,0.01636821,0.007370188,0.010039233,0.0008144368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003613284,0.00003386622,0.0027699138,0.00003942283,0.000033151446,0.00047948858,0.0018261976,0.002561169,0.00047748303,0.9815522,0.0016516385,0.008539354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044799996,0.00006004555,0.0014928071,0.000110239984,0.000034939418,0.00023860643,0.0004946492,0.004732346,0.00042464395,0.9779418,0.014360699,0.00006441013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011677007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008407669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.988323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007073652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013949046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36303556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264183851","doi":"","title":"At the Intersection of North American Free Trade and Same-Sex Marriage","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Isolationism; Economic integration; Globalization; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Politics; Economic globalization; Free trade; Political economy; Sociology; Law; International trade; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.010735404447816115,"score_gpt":0.20946712159040975,"score_spread":0.19873171714259363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264183851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05338011,0.009623115,0.0014764452,0.09095309,0.0008314403,0.0000095271025,0.000029307756,0.000017701752,0.84367925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92734283,0.009003083,0.0007074332,0.018929578,0.0005944104,0.000043715427,0.000029697767,0.000027301003,0.043321904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947916,0.0021030332,0.00007252995,0.0004644108,0.0010597557,0.0015087108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978264,0.00091215136,0.00018694224,0.00013710679,0.0004807243,0.00045669504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028159276,0.00022855222,0.00039898575,0.0014873814,0.028286511,0.008545103,0.0010637104,0.00314474,0.008263274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003397008,0.0002108141,0.0004039126,0.0024997876,0.028722825,0.0047667273,0.006666038,0.0042682406,0.0003653139],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076558335,0.000013467967,0.0010080233,0.000018947501,0.0000039217907,0.00018746156,0.03853907,0.000046636753,0.000031402178,0.9432303,0.007457868,0.009455276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012265413,0.000020363444,0.012464413,0.00053433364,0.000027006294,0.00039665445,0.14235078,0.00023340582,0.00015185039,0.36249125,0.48127317,0.00004447594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43256578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6464787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43256578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014936138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018670384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8600959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264430798","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2728448","title":"Chapter 6 Legal Aspects of Health Applications of Genomics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill University and Génome Québec Innovation Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Genomics; Biology; Genome; Genetics","score_opus":0.011991529829662614,"score_gpt":0.28415047188281306,"score_spread":0.27215894205315044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264430798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069076037,0.023966998,0.009914374,0.075180925,0.0017029212,0.00021770445,0.00027334498,0.000048458256,0.8817877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33102202,0.03131176,0.016858337,0.07232893,0.008841498,0.0006703117,0.00040227908,0.00014369044,0.53842115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99453235,0.0021179419,0.00027338488,0.0005717682,0.0017675133,0.0007370629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950335,0.003433207,0.00025952552,0.00034121727,0.0007488972,0.00018362304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055288533,0.00043798168,0.0004955676,0.001672251,0.004362386,0.009619401,0.0016585712,0.012461853,0.015473205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009403959,0.00048132273,0.0010910304,0.0014212081,0.00947848,0.004472826,0.0024716835,0.008321561,0.0024343217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003886833,0.000020130434,0.00014414417,0.000043650754,0.0000037648597,0.000055624914,0.00091754727,0.00015708226,0.00011147631,0.97657657,0.017175725,0.004790371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012302373,0.000030474288,0.0015181919,0.00071155065,0.000019322593,0.00022748925,0.0012447765,0.00045783928,0.0005540093,0.55659294,0.43860078,0.000030318739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011806298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01456292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015473205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046353927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070301257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051763058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265053783","doi":"","title":"‘Even a Successful Lawsuit Will Be a Worry’: Law and Community Relations in L. M. Montgomery’s Life and Work","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Lawsuit; Witness; Law; Accident (philosophy); Plot (graphics); Political science; Sociology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01896576532311175,"score_gpt":0.26593464564253544,"score_spread":0.24696888031942368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265053783","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10244286,0.025635114,0.0010970519,0.77980006,0.0020926793,0.000036959562,0.000016850032,0.00007150674,0.08880699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8599711,0.008930318,0.0008347526,0.086109534,0.0016008193,0.00007854273,0.000012728972,0.00012406135,0.042338096],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994107,0.003990788,0.000052030944,0.0003667867,0.00043815473,0.001045217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929813,0.0037507787,0.00038470072,0.0001343752,0.00031943354,0.0024293703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043524047,0.0004912307,0.000498328,0.0012953609,0.06440775,0.015348151,0.0022113328,0.010554836,0.003524502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007048834,0.00069866533,0.0002657611,0.0009818044,0.057094358,0.009613247,0.010430287,0.0142943645,0.00058861775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014880407,0.000070526854,0.0007170667,0.000035584548,0.0000058461987,0.0013185492,0.79264647,0.00004302882,0.00023392927,0.10573581,0.086397335,0.012780932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000108575105,0.00006466992,0.001610931,0.00022152098,0.000004320343,0.0010505186,0.538614,0.00012219045,0.0001832503,0.023976082,0.43409947,0.000042302985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05334899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10061002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06440775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013328158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009427508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106076896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265065212","doi":"","title":"New Brunswick Human Rights Act","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0141904969213125,"score_gpt":0.29372372198909114,"score_spread":0.2795332250677786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265065212","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0072490876,0.009932624,0.00091384875,0.04303453,0.0064723333,0.0011294864,0.016094197,0.000326873,0.91484696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016091395,0.004257146,0.0024606714,0.030999368,0.0004835678,0.001595926,0.0035367648,0.00015016856,0.940425],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918139,0.00090466125,0.0008773472,0.0010517404,0.0031355345,0.002216935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922805,0.0025672084,0.0003820308,0.0011660774,0.003001047,0.00060324307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061565735,0.0019695912,0.001888139,0.0043078535,0.00995395,0.014575091,0.0049874205,0.019220032,0.052667707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019531632,0.00289011,0.0015692515,0.006061882,0.0040688757,0.003820494,0.0042062844,0.018425379,0.02137725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012593967,0.00010437272,0.0013923199,0.0002559651,0.000049309325,0.0007094861,0.0012747162,0.00033519405,0.0006477779,0.2579434,0.7169412,0.020220382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009241559,0.000017411054,0.0072175898,0.0006798042,0.000047026435,0.000118720905,0.0005549413,0.000116507596,0.00032392863,0.00938571,0.9813349,0.00011094609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73595136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8974804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26404864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040710248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09376685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5312073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265225572","doi":"","title":"Angoisse Identitaire Et Critique Du Droit. La 'Critique Juridique Identitaire Américaine' Comme Objet Et Source De Réflexion Théorique (Identity, Anguish, and Legal Critique. 'American Identity-Based Critique' as an Object and a Source of Theoretical Reflection)","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Anguish; Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.008733067921432837,"score_gpt":0.3352515685027662,"score_spread":0.32651850058133336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265225572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02985965,0.083388016,0.0027891654,0.37287065,0.001566798,0.000022956066,0.00010282595,0.000033080833,0.50936687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86428106,0.01806854,0.00114778,0.01732538,0.0012174768,0.00006807188,0.000052151023,0.00006927348,0.09777028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950958,0.0026169154,0.00012208514,0.00052246696,0.0011613637,0.0004813448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966505,0.0019397179,0.0003979073,0.00019052695,0.0005881196,0.00023324891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004406604,0.00038053025,0.00041314278,0.002520049,0.017575072,0.01234022,0.0009011625,0.00583545,0.005068381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076450566,0.00036317107,0.00026915717,0.0036921566,0.04541615,0.006634334,0.0036927282,0.008447388,0.00060746074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037036016,0.0000052253263,0.00012476592,0.000019656974,0.0000011332085,0.00002898106,0.018393952,0.0000293417,0.000028400087,0.96687704,0.010403658,0.0040842085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016711858,0.000009190343,0.0019450467,0.00046891946,0.000007995179,0.00012401748,0.034612194,0.00020153151,0.00017101555,0.3156293,0.6467921,0.00002196548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14609188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17812383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14609188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022579897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014052398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29048306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265345618","doi":"10.5623/cig2013-041","title":"Geomatics and the Law: <i>Hartley v. Cunningham:</i> Trees as Common Property","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GEOMATICA","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geomatics; Property (philosophy); Sociology; Law; Geography; Philosophy; Epistemology; Political science; Cartography","score_opus":0.011090147186481505,"score_gpt":0.2581819669303814,"score_spread":0.24709181974389993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265345618","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012037374,0.03527794,0.0021772601,0.7621199,0.0027960746,0.000071230235,0.00044001034,0.00008572796,0.1849945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3776955,0.019604124,0.0027817497,0.529226,0.0047745304,0.00018382314,0.0001747171,0.000095699834,0.06546393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704903,0.0009385359,0.00013391678,0.00045823673,0.00083709485,0.0005831611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951207,0.003087344,0.0004212157,0.00021600493,0.0008011807,0.00035347894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034081165,0.00058305945,0.0006101005,0.0017549251,0.008843809,0.009186412,0.0029448252,0.023410693,0.007463232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011248788,0.0005888807,0.00050483353,0.0034015488,0.016529556,0.009379382,0.0038886357,0.010546269,0.0008230218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008457729,0.00000929974,0.00023481516,0.00004231071,0.0000045605834,0.000079799545,0.0019592852,0.00012260817,0.000039605075,0.80035144,0.19388482,0.0032631794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003316355,0.000021134965,0.0029002551,0.0005885599,0.000033862685,0.00013393132,0.004953964,0.0005376593,0.00042741164,0.46675244,0.52350825,0.0001093687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25531846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38762125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25531846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010593104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01467424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5076647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266687343","doi":"","title":"Rule 11(E)(1)(C) and the Sentencing Guidelines: Bargaining Outside the Heartland?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Conviction; Sentence; Sentencing guidelines; Law; Guideline; Political science; Economic Justice; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02250927074885195,"score_gpt":0.3019852667799017,"score_spread":0.2794759960310497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266687343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.113684535,0.011033027,0.04010613,0.3331374,0.0025054738,0.00016953198,0.00010451159,0.00017648807,0.49908295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8869638,0.0025668584,0.008263788,0.055041716,0.0010006963,0.00016091544,0.00004032789,0.00007172151,0.045890126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9717691,0.011052938,0.0012627053,0.0037529937,0.007390403,0.0047718873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98195326,0.01188118,0.0017340239,0.0010572203,0.0025807181,0.00079364947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02009232,0.0002960649,0.00054077624,0.001182036,0.009805668,0.014362125,0.0024731522,0.015445821,0.005840456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06425732,0.0007049325,0.0003937182,0.00199767,0.014665349,0.008486335,0.0034544182,0.014000493,0.0012167002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001804181,0.00002301148,0.0013068448,0.00003355903,0.000011997527,0.0002058885,0.0064080916,0.00059976714,0.000290292,0.939772,0.015032422,0.03629807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066429806,0.00010530401,0.012592651,0.00076330954,0.00008395896,0.00035407156,0.018280981,0.0031985426,0.001802133,0.5574205,0.40504616,0.00028590875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2576355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32259148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2576355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014381633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026277388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51227176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267723364","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court's Compassionate Judge: Charter Jurisprudence in the Cory Years","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Charter; Political science; Doctrine; Honour; Power (physics); Sociology","score_opus":0.013631953678877958,"score_gpt":0.29142958070463143,"score_spread":0.27779762702575345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267723364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16840434,0.02875447,0.0043669,0.31284872,0.0018271102,0.000053516877,0.000048643633,0.000042213058,0.48365405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96722645,0.0021085686,0.00062702567,0.011011636,0.00033004532,0.000015945428,0.000007637096,0.000034461606,0.018638287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886513,0.0054498306,0.00024162188,0.0014848319,0.002292801,0.0018796681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98681146,0.0089520775,0.00093174574,0.00078272633,0.0012364126,0.0012855388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0147042405,0.00024394515,0.00045131237,0.0015302642,0.01930437,0.016629234,0.0010866822,0.009526655,0.0028194017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039053205,0.00047645936,0.00022189549,0.0022553436,0.04870298,0.009003258,0.0060875136,0.012603041,0.0002127165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016483482,0.000009486724,0.00040397092,0.000009508009,0.000001483154,0.00019389042,0.02121335,0.000106725754,0.00007513163,0.96389925,0.008036787,0.006033894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007042283,0.00006760366,0.0048955777,0.0003561632,0.000009026475,0.00022474439,0.021007808,0.0007539788,0.00044571233,0.36941984,0.6026573,0.00009187795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18890955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25149974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81109047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032286983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026493285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3756199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268350524","doi":"","title":"An Appeal to Reason: A Review of Roy B. Flemming, Tournament of Appeals: Granting Judicial Review in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Political science; Judicial review; Discretion; Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.02451983910168061,"score_gpt":0.35151441312121506,"score_spread":0.32699457401953447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268350524","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012609114,0.9906036,0.000050862072,0.0068009915,0.00046926638,0.000009433452,0.00002636398,0.0000030988895,0.0019102094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024523633,0.991163,0.00014434157,0.0050225575,0.000544067,0.000011008447,0.000030607258,0.000006918102,0.00062516355],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99420893,0.0011282315,0.0005962568,0.00046720752,0.003089962,0.0005094887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96509945,0.016753783,0.0015178748,0.0004613072,0.014404334,0.0017633064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011094419,0.000764802,0.001873357,0.013705602,0.0041418276,0.008522472,0.0023884191,0.0046377694,0.0025793163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02540697,0.00094404677,0.00069634744,0.023540165,0.008480864,0.00438902,0.0018075944,0.0053589786,0.00067806576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008562531,0.00009655911,0.0013865309,0.021754809,0.00012099682,0.00039305765,0.004498414,0.0006489811,0.0003731157,0.078842856,0.5465303,0.34526882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011928745,0.00002071746,0.0036167472,0.017012466,0.000047113183,0.00014038933,0.00066180393,0.000077989745,0.00005463344,0.0025196443,0.9757874,0.000049272356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81260574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9141286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18739426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06948601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1456315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5041586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269229896","doi":"","title":"Empty Ritual, Mechanical Exercise or the Discipline of Deference?: Revisiting the Standard of Review in Administrative Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Standard of review; Sophistication; Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Administrative law; Doctrine; Political science; Judicial review; Transparency (behavior); State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.040744062725474955,"score_gpt":0.3629541067238302,"score_spread":0.3222100439983553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269229896","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09116399,0.03900736,0.3904246,0.2696461,0.004274387,0.00037346865,0.00017278346,0.00044664275,0.20449057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91550326,0.0044925804,0.056153093,0.014914922,0.0028031485,0.00028886026,0.000040894778,0.0001494524,0.0056538116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.86716545,0.07264586,0.008889673,0.0097538475,0.0373736,0.004171671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7451092,0.16228549,0.015445459,0.035292026,0.037733454,0.00413435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12038536,0.0006081313,0.0021189344,0.00697418,0.007529261,0.025465503,0.0046670074,0.010119788,0.0014470408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23799184,0.0010578255,0.0014088523,0.0037113712,0.096220374,0.027973821,0.009026509,0.012354229,0.00052064826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009327255,0.000007763156,0.00016631572,0.00005487304,0.000006526002,0.000017824508,0.0017020655,0.00016721092,0.00009376517,0.990033,0.00085775566,0.0068835206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016441516,0.00004145291,0.0005256689,0.0002596189,0.000013892138,0.000052748805,0.0006812734,0.00073396607,0.00021312982,0.9783981,0.019023625,0.00004009574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005656158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004766879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12038536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012225626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018425586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6366663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270540995","doi":"","title":"The Criminal Justice Principles of Charles Hamilton Houston: Lessons in Innovation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Baltimore law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Defense attorney; Sociology; Criminology; History; Politics","score_opus":0.05072771945486774,"score_gpt":0.3032486934254714,"score_spread":0.25252097397060363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270540995","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004565003,0.03810721,0.005925403,0.82274085,0.003598414,0.00003451194,0.000032192453,0.00007443234,0.124922015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5236417,0.08113262,0.017512865,0.22712271,0.0111727035,0.0002647636,0.00005908187,0.0001897093,0.13890387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955825,0.001781972,0.00009352889,0.0006143818,0.001373684,0.00055400055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882366,0.0071721105,0.0003499263,0.0007271762,0.0014778611,0.0020362723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00988467,0.0004589816,0.00043797918,0.0010207687,0.0053641507,0.009156678,0.0017990102,0.0055313916,0.005416854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012067244,0.0002853609,0.0002946384,0.0011024808,0.03388438,0.00860658,0.004264017,0.008959408,0.0010583728],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011605944,0.000025243875,0.00019973368,0.000046904977,0.000003960369,0.000075292315,0.0013510823,0.00026950665,0.0000354504,0.8873643,0.08021597,0.030400848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029451048,0.000026963886,0.0003213761,0.0002867091,0.000003686477,0.000045994973,0.0011451327,0.00038919772,0.00010196309,0.4625961,0.53502476,0.000028677106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039377823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03924495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039377823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0133495955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026961103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0968585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274038361","doi":"","title":"One More Brick in the Wall: The Impact of Personal Jurisdiction of Ex Juris Defendants on the Relationship Between the United States and Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Personal jurisdiction; Ex parte; Law; Brick; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Engineering; Civil engineering","score_opus":0.054840712301713175,"score_gpt":0.30804286064676156,"score_spread":0.2532021483450484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274038361","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60534596,0.003309088,0.00054798677,0.19537619,0.00053401187,0.00007667628,0.00076676253,0.000017878943,0.19402541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97770876,0.0008051816,0.00010720919,0.013579351,0.00014117469,0.000021231925,0.00008797157,0.000019253452,0.00752982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914943,0.0030829506,0.00016666114,0.00053066626,0.0018671207,0.002858342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96277505,0.023182182,0.0028531803,0.0007244719,0.0052708765,0.005194155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049352306,0.00029556855,0.00085480325,0.002173766,0.017486963,0.00928764,0.0027981636,0.0070633707,0.020058813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049616743,0.0002720454,0.0009750317,0.0025521808,0.011546497,0.005855499,0.0071525215,0.011528074,0.0006815542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010712303,0.00077548285,0.14783435,0.0002125065,0.0005577226,0.004530399,0.08660269,0.0033377204,0.0009896193,0.5722174,0.14586568,0.036005225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050894223,0.0004865203,0.35430413,0.0014072589,0.0015077541,0.0006005656,0.38627157,0.0049751946,0.0017236705,0.16586387,0.0818135,0.000536975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7366904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84268403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2633096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016546976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02174048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52972054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274860673","doi":"","title":"Considering the Evidence, No Wonder the Court Upheld Canada's Regulation of Cigarette Advertising","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Policy & Marketing","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wonder; Advertising; Political science; Law; Business; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03264630197409187,"score_gpt":0.30203551557208497,"score_spread":0.2693892135979931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274860673","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023750335,0.003072322,0.0015353482,0.8056478,0.0033484884,0.000095777636,0.0015714349,0.0001069734,0.16087154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21968201,0.003610272,0.0026549436,0.6807931,0.0024326078,0.00008748343,0.0005846312,0.000075701646,0.090079226],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97529435,0.0015254087,0.00066915987,0.00165376,0.014263646,0.006593591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95125276,0.02303169,0.0015359526,0.0012286004,0.020127697,0.0028233256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009592739,0.0006060232,0.0011684184,0.0032627457,0.015931923,0.012851159,0.005457742,0.03375872,0.015067602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056359418,0.0008885518,0.0019943186,0.003639848,0.0089298785,0.004433306,0.0026718786,0.025320906,0.0018274437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001917405,0.00012800406,0.015031112,0.00035944814,0.00022999097,0.0007534497,0.0025992836,0.00051179656,0.0009423457,0.4553861,0.50754535,0.016321385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039841843,0.0001349306,0.024083195,0.0015850046,0.0009556499,0.00026827448,0.0069582085,0.0022246984,0.0046654567,0.078528225,0.87974614,0.00045182236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9481997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97194266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05180031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04465625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13293518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32400525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275355198","doi":"","title":"Scarred Epistemologies: What a Theolog y of the Cross Has to Say about the Gay Marriage Ban","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intersections Canadian Journal of Music","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.03686937369963159,"score_gpt":0.2859495322431794,"score_spread":0.24908015854354784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275355198","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0651477,0.020821692,0.02397695,0.51912826,0.004656196,0.000040303166,0.00014035347,0.000052610474,0.36603594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9517968,0.00400824,0.0031721368,0.023933757,0.0029565888,0.000061113395,0.0000616265,0.000120295415,0.01388939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897093,0.006640247,0.00024283826,0.0008789594,0.0013966716,0.0011319688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9770486,0.015237023,0.0010592826,0.0021551717,0.0026878903,0.001812003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01652672,0.0006991229,0.0013331757,0.0044709896,0.016426574,0.02484722,0.003475475,0.012896734,0.013187516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033295482,0.00067413657,0.0007924292,0.0036820546,0.08633939,0.040864907,0.009676158,0.022481352,0.00084206724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009426041,0.000011886817,0.00013899474,0.00001598064,0.0000056201475,0.000041504973,0.0072434237,0.000042928063,0.000015911688,0.987849,0.0024563277,0.0021690694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009393522,0.000004439895,0.00013691976,0.000112373695,0.000006190056,0.000035717858,0.009820519,0.00015649883,0.0000430488,0.96850955,0.021155205,0.000010125474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020136874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017406808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02484722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009696683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010397515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08740264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275514020","doi":"","title":"Immigration Law - Alien Denied Entry to Another Country and Returned Involuntarily to United States, Not \"Found In\" United States","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deportation; Law; Alien; Statute; Immigration; Political science; Immigration law; Lawsuit; Federal law; Conviction; Legislation; Citizenship; Politics","score_opus":0.017414930757544828,"score_gpt":0.2883466331919541,"score_spread":0.2709317024344092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275514020","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03194563,0.0011775905,0.0006444828,0.025730953,0.001702117,0.00023070253,0.0034486023,0.00021236861,0.9349075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19058387,0.001330342,0.00092744234,0.08512958,0.00054739375,0.00048822045,0.0033069244,0.00010499666,0.7175813],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967362,0.00024762537,0.00017837434,0.00057870755,0.0010075168,0.0012516312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981768,0.00043367542,0.00012170251,0.0001831451,0.00082696724,0.00025766488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016013522,0.00081049657,0.0006463139,0.0012297584,0.012652405,0.0066881357,0.0022427528,0.011324138,0.033853076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00451145,0.0007989458,0.0011808532,0.0011215584,0.0023680325,0.0029726035,0.004123213,0.007350341,0.01340023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098007615,0.00026879733,0.008712631,0.000116320116,0.000036542526,0.0027061119,0.004144303,0.00020014535,0.0015422967,0.19746394,0.7688585,0.015852498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010438513,0.00015313523,0.01936757,0.00047524346,0.000099293524,0.0009280475,0.0057258317,0.00036770175,0.0013240608,0.005252913,0.966103,0.000098881894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20499334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48951185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20499334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056904377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01215969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40760028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276392976","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review Standards for Interest Arbitration Awards Under the Employee Free Choice Act","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"USF Scholarship Repository (University of San Francisco)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Appeal; Statute; Compulsory arbitration; Judicial review; Presumption; Political science; Negotiation; Legislature; Law; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.05319719207445227,"score_gpt":0.301760431959914,"score_spread":0.2485632398854617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276392976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041014936,0.013077421,0.20383437,0.23329051,0.011785785,0.0065969164,0.0017089834,0.0024973669,0.48619363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5271491,0.0067717033,0.2603292,0.09042154,0.011296592,0.007777655,0.0013790403,0.0009380072,0.09393728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.599662,0.12679973,0.07109699,0.018948192,0.16368385,0.019809313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.447836,0.3143532,0.026347136,0.043488648,0.1620231,0.0059518586],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.32256648,0.00076046115,0.0024406442,0.009527074,0.011127117,0.022450909,0.008598857,0.026347673,0.004489774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.48038688,0.0024621484,0.0024560776,0.00440765,0.0138156,0.00933381,0.006430207,0.022175789,0.0038704465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000891413,0.00022876807,0.002991643,0.00036236754,0.000056765777,0.00025075537,0.0048533054,0.0012046697,0.001152993,0.8323057,0.10187391,0.054629933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040405398,0.00044491654,0.01506054,0.0028559044,0.0002931234,0.00058385433,0.0031597891,0.006530398,0.003992756,0.3498287,0.6161376,0.00070824736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026330959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039809357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32256648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014363132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058629423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8353962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278908142","doi":"","title":"J(TR): Time to Remove Religion From the Oath","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Oath; Witness; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0065677045471131835,"score_gpt":0.24790843827024628,"score_spread":0.24134073372313308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278908142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027049698,0.001006646,0.023246367,0.45999846,0.0165613,0.00036189484,0.001039162,0.0010501838,0.46968633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3805778,0.0008323193,0.008953029,0.47118974,0.01413869,0.0005296442,0.00030117438,0.0006457185,0.12283191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906221,0.0013327714,0.0010748584,0.0021690952,0.0023555704,0.0024455437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97422487,0.017596163,0.0011125087,0.0023138607,0.0038368325,0.00091578305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015950078,0.00046219738,0.0010352673,0.00068378705,0.005809556,0.0054858085,0.0050988845,0.034433566,0.019985167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044484507,0.00068727287,0.0022447223,0.00056399265,0.0088689905,0.0071409293,0.003147165,0.021160373,0.007430447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012435099,0.00004340361,0.0012556204,0.00013035092,0.000033085602,0.0013296631,0.002761814,0.00017641086,0.0014990327,0.7793757,0.20735082,0.00591993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002285482,0.00035172747,0.005614934,0.00048884196,0.00019161278,0.0022734713,0.0065841633,0.0017677273,0.004609922,0.27735454,0.7001941,0.00034041065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021219928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022540776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034433566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034175878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006119787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08435309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279006159","doi":"","title":"Follow the North Star: Canada as a Model to Increase the Independence, Integrity and Efficiency of the U.S. Immigration Adjudication System","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Immigration; Independence (probability theory); Star (game theory); Political science; Geography; Law; Physics; Astrophysics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.012650915798952493,"score_gpt":0.2307023007858504,"score_spread":0.2180513849868979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279006159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09333561,0.0015960784,0.01243426,0.21096349,0.0012914722,0.00035318418,0.00096679165,0.0004447396,0.6786145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68916893,0.0012546197,0.016026108,0.028578518,0.00017122594,0.00012283126,0.00029319982,0.0002500799,0.26413447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99318475,0.0011407802,0.00010000983,0.00055394863,0.0028773549,0.0021431162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99033594,0.0009602733,0.0002609065,0.00039577953,0.0051778364,0.0028691646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045196936,0.0003061628,0.0002788741,0.0015813855,0.017257586,0.009445507,0.0015781816,0.0041517937,0.013298366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015085645,0.0003487414,0.00042832724,0.0023239683,0.0048253713,0.003267311,0.00366433,0.004509891,0.0017548426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013020917,0.0000990207,0.014925309,0.000073379204,0.000037552345,0.0003768221,0.0053835385,0.0036811745,0.0006245145,0.60822254,0.29220206,0.07424391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002209578,0.00012129874,0.0213216,0.00030311168,0.000104682586,0.00015947946,0.011978295,0.011914733,0.0015137226,0.076116964,0.87603,0.00021507042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98758185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92970103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.070298985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25425747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5100572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2280291964","doi":"","title":"Re) Constructing Judicial Ethics in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Accountability; Generality; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Judicial independence; State (computer science); Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.027952814325779538,"score_gpt":0.24230421124752666,"score_spread":0.21435139692174712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2280291964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06394614,0.008213259,0.005465104,0.112497464,0.0012606353,0.00014992896,0.0003362162,0.00013839145,0.8079929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86675316,0.0038337456,0.004184905,0.015742583,0.00017194572,0.00007971519,0.00010693105,0.00006488016,0.10906218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938279,0.0011835274,0.0001398843,0.0005203529,0.0018786233,0.0024496247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965404,0.0007102344,0.00015008684,0.00009973674,0.00164486,0.0008547443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033636698,0.00032010686,0.0003094861,0.001707604,0.019320996,0.013729408,0.0017774098,0.004522063,0.00510296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007075608,0.00032141083,0.0003214062,0.0023696045,0.015046083,0.0025583422,0.004013578,0.005280833,0.00043755752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008464517,0.000008280415,0.0011776659,0.000028837836,0.0000042075867,0.00015247171,0.012442801,0.00040710726,0.00009149258,0.9468721,0.029882543,0.008924102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018403705,0.000017655851,0.0065348595,0.00029152958,0.00003146961,0.00013072361,0.03319084,0.0020356518,0.0003650224,0.12244484,0.8348538,0.00008520426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9903593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99341387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18023664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18023664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28808805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9508093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283363849","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1310","title":"Of Banks, Federalism and Clear Statement Rules: Bank of Montreal v. Marcotte","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Doctrine; Supreme court; Statement (logic); Political science; New Federalism; Statutory law; Statutory interpretation; Cooperative federalism; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Law; Dual federalism; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.04504876488770859,"score_gpt":0.32404270331181456,"score_spread":0.27899393842410597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283363849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07799875,0.0116154775,0.013025626,0.34278926,0.0019549846,0.00040160184,0.0009508422,0.00018302252,0.5510805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81179386,0.0027021072,0.005092493,0.078647956,0.00053172035,0.00021193096,0.00013173232,0.00006206533,0.10082618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918188,0.0016251047,0.00021247585,0.0011547306,0.0031252918,0.0020636343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930315,0.003707047,0.00043663138,0.0003084618,0.0019019174,0.0006144783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008330273,0.00046916274,0.00047299938,0.0013626005,0.015997335,0.009962271,0.003551775,0.013183597,0.0055574067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026164,0.0008101669,0.0005946346,0.0017306784,0.011765412,0.0039059082,0.0023324327,0.011972504,0.00047389296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002026507,0.000010830437,0.0011034857,0.00002788353,0.0000122845295,0.0002655632,0.0023972495,0.0001508015,0.00022918361,0.9575104,0.03438357,0.003888352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024337246,0.000095337746,0.017131684,0.00063900155,0.00017612138,0.000353629,0.0046669147,0.0034032324,0.0028301477,0.2399436,0.73014396,0.00037291847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9203476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9480304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07965243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046844777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.066247895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33988428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285547032","doi":"","title":"Sexual predator laws in Canada.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Predator; Psychology; Criminology; Law; Political science; Biology; Ecology; Predation","score_opus":0.0270717790487623,"score_gpt":0.23996036371587892,"score_spread":0.21288858466711663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285547032","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24971382,0.05488809,0.0010471559,0.14437279,0.0017966678,0.00047312715,0.032414176,0.00023933465,0.5150548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7520002,0.0283851,0.0010189724,0.020380253,0.00027625938,0.000119184304,0.0044802553,0.00005438026,0.19328539],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970831,0.00014056255,0.00013264784,0.00018169497,0.0014902448,0.0009716953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99047405,0.0019384596,0.0006798075,0.00015027136,0.0055654976,0.0011919449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014694465,0.00020704162,0.00038982547,0.0031480165,0.009609737,0.003533706,0.0019218076,0.00266059,0.016550545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011164684,0.00033128084,0.0002859658,0.005521789,0.0018680558,0.0010375995,0.0011171247,0.002548933,0.00073727395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017737343,0.00016555078,0.06466018,0.0008976628,0.00009682469,0.0015829973,0.006788906,0.0009491029,0.00045139345,0.22246723,0.5923197,0.10944303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010656941,0.00007418928,0.22855173,0.0009494978,0.00015984422,0.00042028763,0.008585089,0.001134756,0.0007191073,0.006952815,0.7522233,0.00012277604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9977139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078519225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.078519225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23237967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5696995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288254698","doi":"","title":"Canada v. United States of America","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.009069578412270709,"score_gpt":0.2369884345714382,"score_spread":0.2279188561591675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288254698","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01424053,0.006385715,0.0007091255,0.031983357,0.0009952103,0.00012080469,0.0019534866,0.00017080603,0.94344085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2474709,0.007581391,0.0017095641,0.08117662,0.00024779083,0.00019297858,0.0011828939,0.00012483231,0.66031295],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969997,0.000103397346,0.00006376848,0.00024689105,0.0016131949,0.00097298535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769324,0.00034540746,0.00009516585,0.00005223135,0.0014712325,0.00034270217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007834709,0.00045899997,0.0003344657,0.001892815,0.018763194,0.0051427255,0.0011168465,0.0050718132,0.022376684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003908815,0.0004608872,0.00045264044,0.0023888962,0.0022461303,0.0011369301,0.0013380661,0.0041584787,0.002009137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003578177,0.000027370153,0.0050976817,0.00017012312,0.00002905998,0.0009219628,0.0015914607,0.00032024522,0.0005188044,0.35513067,0.60881364,0.02734322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002934028,0.000013141334,0.0058158617,0.0002651337,0.00004767987,0.00019121212,0.0010920898,0.00025998303,0.00044737585,0.007816158,0.983968,0.00005399582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9863214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99529266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03555871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03555871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15582626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25799775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289530266","doi":"","title":"Marriage: Legal Aspects","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.00664601981876684,"score_gpt":0.264095510572992,"score_spread":0.2574494907542252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289530266","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04564631,0.008701185,0.0034939444,0.043976318,0.00062813703,0.000058594862,0.00017665049,0.000020594622,0.89729834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8499746,0.004134642,0.0007202568,0.0068473513,0.0011268479,0.00008006762,0.00011654638,0.000021328846,0.13697839],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977063,0.00087791483,0.00008144112,0.00027272868,0.00048366337,0.0005779009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981152,0.0008099243,0.00015580117,0.00016140398,0.00036565142,0.00039210587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019123327,0.00023463798,0.0005207607,0.0013439602,0.007885435,0.006142803,0.0010759004,0.0061977194,0.035043735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074887597,0.00029636652,0.00031324354,0.0018713626,0.010475946,0.004143114,0.0038542226,0.0038980595,0.0030702688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055565874,0.000027956072,0.0006093474,0.000011368198,0.0000016457841,0.00010117147,0.0021654728,0.000040693416,0.000034630186,0.9861311,0.004569454,0.0063015125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020163883,0.00004784227,0.005287527,0.00018135575,0.000012834337,0.00062238955,0.010217132,0.00029732767,0.000116832845,0.77352124,0.20965439,0.000020904388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013981522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019027285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035043735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025697078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004586954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11723304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296872476","doi":"","title":"Should the Law Society of Upper Canada Give Its Blessing to Trinity Western University Law School","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blessing; Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.06374453824057522,"score_gpt":0.28782632109302614,"score_spread":0.22408178285245092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296872476","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002931726,0.002006317,0.00025065968,0.9369838,0.010527098,0.000046322035,0.0002794762,0.00013634878,0.046838216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05038715,0.0022351285,0.001716739,0.6670072,0.003212,0.00007805424,0.00027895736,0.00023188654,0.27485296],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.979076,0.0014714056,0.00054435915,0.001533359,0.0072527663,0.010122019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9088765,0.0064419177,0.0015338298,0.0024980635,0.04480901,0.03584071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01272837,0.00073936087,0.0015498284,0.0024199502,0.036028173,0.023937535,0.0055329315,0.04909398,0.03503398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05480888,0.0009783603,0.0015295438,0.002769834,0.0158964,0.008960318,0.006097198,0.026107905,0.008236819],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042463897,0.000057636393,0.0017741632,0.00006345689,0.000038165075,0.000115970826,0.0010959365,0.00011993638,0.00016372313,0.05797939,0.9276898,0.010859328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000380483,0.000019697884,0.00347819,0.00022896529,0.000040754287,0.000028218743,0.004727585,0.00023845321,0.00020241585,0.010810223,0.98006254,0.00012487687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9648668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9830881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06779373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06779373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3753239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49188024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297903105","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2749212","title":"Has the Supreme Court of Canada Rejected 'Originalism'?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Majority opinion","score_opus":0.0132876229293175,"score_gpt":0.25088194590505614,"score_spread":0.23759432297573863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297903105","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03502717,0.0035366318,0.0010932371,0.76898426,0.003393757,0.000055345394,0.00042440917,0.00006672594,0.18741843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69213927,0.0018364856,0.0011472142,0.23811544,0.002283238,0.000041914514,0.00015453192,0.00015448919,0.0641275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9753263,0.00276315,0.00046615084,0.0025453812,0.0103140315,0.0085850265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94902796,0.014454002,0.0020641864,0.003060147,0.026074681,0.005319004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023975018,0.00046284794,0.0011786371,0.0024747835,0.024397025,0.021348968,0.006035024,0.017301563,0.012564896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08555764,0.0004968221,0.0008700453,0.0035328534,0.041545715,0.0059442385,0.0043448918,0.01891693,0.0010868241],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007180418,0.000031235995,0.0025968666,0.00008547777,0.00004079781,0.00023107648,0.0054019745,0.00020988974,0.00010019176,0.8130788,0.16548589,0.012666007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002655605,0.00004230349,0.01234929,0.00056568737,0.00014257344,0.00017127866,0.013815415,0.0010560497,0.0008045373,0.2970906,0.67344886,0.00024796458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9548919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95898825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9006006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09939938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2136213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72119635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298045547","doi":"","title":"Gender Essentialism and American Law: Why and How to Sever the Connection","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of gender law & policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Washington and Lee University","keywords":"Transsexual; Transgender; Gender dysphoria; Gender Identity Disorder; Psychology; Transvestism; Conviction; Medicalization; Identity (music); Essentialism; Law enforcement; Misdemeanor; Obligation; Law; Lesbian; Dehumanization; Social psychology; Criminology; Psychiatry; Sociology; Gender identity; Gender studies; Psychoanalysis; Political science","score_opus":0.054564147899543114,"score_gpt":0.3350831900351788,"score_spread":0.28051904213563567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298045547","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0359934,0.028072862,0.0050702402,0.6774746,0.0034176796,0.000010820959,0.00006303817,0.000042118496,0.24985515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8578274,0.016070073,0.0023494875,0.09686148,0.00397251,0.00004510063,0.000048158174,0.00007651833,0.022749152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99686843,0.0014187818,0.00007368174,0.00037168415,0.00061529974,0.00065203215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962626,0.0018725091,0.0002940087,0.0002429101,0.0007375788,0.00059037434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047805686,0.00024030101,0.00034612374,0.0014777897,0.0078538675,0.0063776122,0.0010139535,0.0047280192,0.008058598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009648057,0.00024712164,0.0003586438,0.0013424755,0.04090176,0.011787298,0.0041510644,0.009945739,0.000608422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063905536,0.000012834564,0.0006462197,0.000013072908,0.000002233778,0.000036012178,0.003518509,0.000015122696,0.000031159878,0.9754851,0.011758731,0.008474577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010160365,0.00001057892,0.0020070479,0.00025570148,0.000010756803,0.0001106143,0.0059758737,0.000094852476,0.00008509969,0.78835595,0.20306706,0.000016271046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041699417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046232022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041699417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007909521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006336789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0829134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298650376","doi":"","title":"\"The Wal-Mart Way\": Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Social Change, and the Canadian Legal Landscape","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography; Business","score_opus":0.03141266923292917,"score_gpt":0.3181969658712287,"score_spread":0.2867842966382995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298650376","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040380932,0.13780992,0.0005117192,0.4657305,0.0015245102,0.00006751226,0.000578494,0.000054743003,0.3533417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82692015,0.05489455,0.0006802983,0.061629567,0.0007809662,0.000042016156,0.0002167478,0.000032474316,0.054803297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99449027,0.00054459454,0.00007343876,0.00029053824,0.0029983253,0.0016029078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973533,0.0005006785,0.00014035562,0.000050931554,0.0014422297,0.00051254686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002732848,0.00037950824,0.0003592971,0.0035948919,0.021362592,0.0119264675,0.0026966673,0.0052023525,0.004661566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008059254,0.00030407126,0.00042227295,0.005034976,0.023887867,0.0030521774,0.0022725773,0.004818477,0.00030765508],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034497913,0.000030809668,0.0048938184,0.00033586335,0.000022945855,0.00039565546,0.017178666,0.00030012857,0.00023230277,0.63427556,0.290329,0.05197082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045699526,0.00002632128,0.05310372,0.0018317095,0.00011671141,0.00022752435,0.04248775,0.00039417425,0.0003169775,0.07599638,0.8253034,0.00014962493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9923658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99767214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12736677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12736677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23400198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9241149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2305552948","doi":"10.21991/c90w9b","title":"RIGHTS, RECOGNITION, AND RECTIFICATION: CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES IN JOHNSON V. SAND","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Rectification; Constitutional law; Law; Political science; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.06385283455441237,"score_gpt":0.27573461441026664,"score_spread":0.21188177985585427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2305552948","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15189591,0.008173409,0.021241523,0.16810885,0.0023051223,0.0009695292,0.00045987483,0.00036117993,0.64648455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9234262,0.0011191024,0.0054830643,0.020335829,0.0005818182,0.00042919346,0.00008578382,0.000051386007,0.048487592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96911734,0.008974005,0.0020662565,0.0034984823,0.008537127,0.0078067505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98876625,0.007815762,0.00085870427,0.0009894692,0.0009807313,0.0005891865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02330307,0.0007383505,0.0015117927,0.0027048707,0.01565746,0.015496932,0.0044427407,0.027905768,0.0046868157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036895875,0.001151053,0.0015973108,0.0020269183,0.024256384,0.008373379,0.008230783,0.017887766,0.0005030998],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021268661,0.00003743715,0.00018165796,0.000017573568,0.000008450671,0.00016065358,0.0012176943,0.0002892956,0.0001592555,0.9895392,0.005751929,0.0026155892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003334961,0.00009912976,0.0026245988,0.00033494685,0.00016223444,0.00030715746,0.0044474797,0.0031509337,0.0028376612,0.8147858,0.17059796,0.00031864297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10854328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12615635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10854328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016218688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032904316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.215823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2310374476","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1353","title":"Book Notes: The Majesty of the Law: Reflections of a Supreme Court Justice, by Sandra Day O'Connor","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; O'Connor","score_opus":0.02361246546314408,"score_gpt":0.3118351738015861,"score_spread":0.288222708338442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2310374476","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011896917,0.057770777,0.00037811714,0.85095644,0.019984227,0.000022720262,0.000104390674,0.000020967127,0.069572575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040663734,0.048967727,0.0008809229,0.48569986,0.021212112,0.00012225358,0.00008363784,0.00025812557,0.40211162],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979394,0.0009428226,0.000077492215,0.00027615228,0.0004782818,0.00028595596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99371606,0.004579781,0.0001554438,0.00015707365,0.00079626136,0.0005953397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031284674,0.0008281174,0.0007692981,0.0012892042,0.020314809,0.014290683,0.002612927,0.019073334,0.017012043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011167585,0.0009664632,0.00053189584,0.002291374,0.016325979,0.0153748235,0.0045517758,0.026650151,0.0032354002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061191895,0.000009505121,0.000043693002,0.000027747707,0.0000015588828,0.0000628124,0.0033862349,0.000018698309,0.000019190657,0.03435302,0.95924765,0.0028237752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000087884055,0.0000076059923,0.00030239922,0.00027588988,0.000004130324,0.00005760267,0.011317473,0.000021453678,0.000048033227,0.016631935,0.97130716,0.00001751681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13849927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42570567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13849927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009256221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013818642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2753862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2310583295","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1219","title":"Law and Feminism: Editor's Note","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.014026141060443734,"score_gpt":0.3046367552947283,"score_spread":0.2906106142342845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2310583295","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026111584,0.0068323226,0.00018772186,0.59426415,0.39588165,0.000017517277,0.000086550295,0.000046585905,0.0024222836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002993593,0.0031083678,0.00043413384,0.5327885,0.45031866,0.00004957985,0.00003039462,0.00009551791,0.010181166],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940217,0.0012849157,0.00059846573,0.0014679461,0.0019345648,0.0006923996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9612062,0.023042416,0.0016966538,0.0013376509,0.010473886,0.0022432553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008894495,0.0020269647,0.0028186738,0.0028771304,0.0088572195,0.011854797,0.0063084704,0.040684134,0.011884689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042824402,0.0012473791,0.002201091,0.0030728122,0.0064390353,0.008359212,0.0041868216,0.030924546,0.0039302944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014543502,0.000013615155,0.00009038404,0.00011609017,0.000014012504,0.000097797536,0.00015877454,0.000016908818,0.000054037166,0.0018194097,0.995161,0.0024435564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005156186,0.000019680783,0.0014992913,0.0006278062,0.00009824638,0.0002404592,0.00086306967,0.00016781059,0.0002170086,0.0040410645,0.9921272,0.000046746027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016196337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051497776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040684134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004342069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009406589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04703909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312640086","doi":"10.1300/j082v47n03_07","title":"The Queer Sensitive Interveners in the<i>Little Sisters</i>Case","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Homosexuality","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Government of Ontario","keywords":"Queer; Lesbian; Supreme court; Scope (computer science); Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04158743626568111,"score_gpt":0.3474361665371785,"score_spread":0.3058487302714974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2312640086","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054058123,0.0029406354,0.0004068658,0.75811833,0.0009047706,0.000043372947,0.000041073377,0.000020779631,0.18346608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33621797,0.0014858642,0.00022153513,0.6076354,0.0007666837,0.000039389637,0.000016128884,0.000027664164,0.053589348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996029,0.000895598,0.00009860653,0.00028893704,0.00087632105,0.0018116282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99523926,0.0027007107,0.0002881905,0.000109309585,0.00064814545,0.0010143936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037942824,0.00023790302,0.00039425376,0.0006055425,0.031740144,0.00614834,0.0013210241,0.029248502,0.0047978736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011736755,0.0005079207,0.00041978172,0.0006750691,0.011009011,0.0019848684,0.0023811066,0.022003613,0.00069640647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009483805,0.00009651599,0.0056424295,0.00007186537,0.000025046127,0.012779426,0.045199182,0.0003448268,0.0012137811,0.5126191,0.40824717,0.013665929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014021414,0.00008165518,0.010049134,0.0006243042,0.00008487929,0.002457466,0.06912068,0.0007244621,0.0020325116,0.085310504,0.82920355,0.00017062295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46691865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67035264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46691865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01647438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02526112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92840177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314285884","doi":"10.2307/3552548","title":"Beyond the Nass Valley: National Implications of the Supreme Court's Delgamuukw Decision","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03462854562494203,"score_gpt":0.3160677530455197,"score_spread":0.28143920742057765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314285884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18202552,0.004318356,0.00043182963,0.40217897,0.0009540092,0.000082549224,0.0009435346,0.000036272486,0.40902892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8427957,0.0022919076,0.00068853557,0.08620409,0.00034631023,0.00007851802,0.00027910125,0.000051410883,0.06726444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99205923,0.0008310164,0.00011049522,0.0005871665,0.0020257747,0.004386348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934151,0.0023262822,0.00025025304,0.0001687292,0.0022139696,0.0016257012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063548777,0.0003132071,0.0009324818,0.0022963304,0.029063376,0.014973037,0.0033915495,0.009400367,0.013594376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020523656,0.0004935883,0.00074335036,0.0029315643,0.011905533,0.0046077957,0.004639379,0.009753995,0.00041162674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016101236,0.000089988134,0.007922601,0.00010411305,0.000046662528,0.00050715596,0.007991568,0.0009210158,0.00029462588,0.8112721,0.149078,0.021611154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029871365,0.00008723292,0.11732228,0.0009635084,0.00030845252,0.00018415853,0.049803156,0.0026802693,0.00087363,0.24610874,0.5810567,0.0003131462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9793835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9940897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08916063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08916063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17447916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64690864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328256650","doi":"10.1056/nejmp1201951","title":"The Severability of the Individual Mandate","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New England Journal of Medicine","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Severability; Mandate; Supreme court; Medicine; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Management; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.039499727826783654,"score_gpt":0.31495717086273434,"score_spread":0.27545744303595066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328256650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13840231,0.0028858306,0.025831461,0.039119206,0.0010260314,0.00025832953,0.0005094051,0.00014223343,0.7918251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96620685,0.00065530156,0.007087996,0.00932786,0.0009066351,0.0002649739,0.00013063815,0.000047038342,0.01537275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9722964,0.008087091,0.0016976766,0.0050250273,0.009181498,0.0037122206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96381485,0.019071143,0.0031981554,0.006032301,0.0059106974,0.0019728157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023862403,0.00041592872,0.0010303461,0.002048014,0.0067381123,0.007949166,0.0025837265,0.0071272203,0.0070150304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059782475,0.00060704286,0.0013403905,0.001154627,0.011643602,0.005025252,0.0056702686,0.0103142755,0.0010494216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032969037,0.000025381383,0.0014556648,0.000037914066,0.00003498815,0.00009941431,0.0006968003,0.00030274913,0.00036009809,0.98375016,0.0042146128,0.008989261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008651069,0.00015920751,0.009025658,0.00045263243,0.0002116669,0.00040386393,0.00086702144,0.0023998502,0.0016709288,0.8932438,0.09136947,0.000109386034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0084987655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010774321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023862403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004240655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013585498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.126198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328835147","doi":"10.1249/jsr.0b013e3182a4b858","title":"Arkansas’ Creation and Implementation of Health and Safety Legislation Utilizing Ambrose’s Requirements for Change","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Sports Medicine Reports","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Medicine; Medical emergency; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.10047560673218602,"score_gpt":0.42698301552486023,"score_spread":0.3265074087926742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328835147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.106010266,0.0034794048,0.023245538,0.28542686,0.0049184505,0.0022090296,0.001514764,0.002503593,0.5706921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.562836,0.0017663811,0.06635667,0.16955093,0.0013175041,0.0026605914,0.0011923073,0.00028230713,0.19403735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.969216,0.007214308,0.0022226984,0.0029033776,0.013412272,0.0050312835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9710981,0.013332201,0.002728101,0.0024085212,0.007547345,0.002885681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023394765,0.0005449236,0.00051924645,0.0018780356,0.0094741965,0.010728181,0.003622312,0.009280207,0.008385912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03386489,0.0007505582,0.0012311455,0.0010005744,0.0040733865,0.003563073,0.007795061,0.01040036,0.00158554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018280523,0.001627073,0.029387908,0.00095512683,0.00013452239,0.0040591573,0.016430665,0.005613715,0.006893473,0.4356014,0.36138678,0.13772745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005110094,0.00035129767,0.022807427,0.00062037184,0.000053805394,0.00044016636,0.00517016,0.0014463997,0.0018158266,0.011023985,0.95603436,0.00018509255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12918575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1760278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12918575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013139252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052787434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2568676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329774564","doi":"10.11575/prism/34397","title":"It May Be Wrong, But Is It Illegal? – Castle-Crown Wilderness Coalition v. Flett and the Limits of Discretionary Decision-making","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wilderness; Crown (dentistry); Computer security; Law; Political science; Operations research; Computer science; Engineering; Medicine; Biology","score_opus":0.06411083598371471,"score_gpt":0.37282778135493116,"score_spread":0.30871694537121647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329774564","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054039683,0.0027413082,0.0038801248,0.67225856,0.00083966576,0.000023770694,0.00006716855,0.000031641754,0.26611802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8866951,0.0011092654,0.0011143773,0.09219624,0.0006975939,0.000017831377,0.000034397963,0.000022392513,0.018112803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902288,0.0027296992,0.00028883314,0.00087799947,0.003182446,0.0026921877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98387766,0.010956735,0.0010888516,0.00082939846,0.002210014,0.001037199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015258627,0.00020058182,0.00038596406,0.0009494695,0.015712703,0.011807266,0.0022976757,0.013297835,0.0041444446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022829683,0.0002732948,0.00061477366,0.0010034087,0.038809646,0.006572314,0.002930423,0.0113828,0.00041143646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022692153,0.00001690052,0.0017923005,0.000019911058,0.00001250291,0.0004629908,0.009898434,0.00022446325,0.00024180255,0.9418843,0.038827017,0.0065967566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061402265,0.000031269225,0.008446791,0.00035006963,0.000046553258,0.00045731166,0.022953207,0.0010913742,0.0008759687,0.6446599,0.32087362,0.00015258841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38470155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5556679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38470155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01860197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021795126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76492465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331372983","doi":"10.3821/1913-701x-144.6.252","title":"Pharmacy owners in Newfoundland and Labrador Going to Court to Challenge Right of Professional Body to Negotiate Compensation Deal","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Pharmacy; Compensation (psychology); Business; Public relations; Political science; Law; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04992982977995006,"score_gpt":0.3119538476937048,"score_spread":0.26202401791375474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331372983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8649263,0.00074298907,0.0006071044,0.028002998,0.0001092332,0.00020699327,0.00040713334,0.00006321263,0.104933955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8649223,0.0003157933,0.0005010277,0.010147848,0.00003180724,0.00006971704,0.00015200773,0.000033982848,0.12382552],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894504,0.001049698,0.00021263013,0.00069466536,0.0016441953,0.0069483034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9772613,0.0077397944,0.0029424974,0.0006122894,0.003758024,0.0076860613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048128255,0.00021475932,0.00059849565,0.0018290464,0.037262708,0.008692931,0.002410949,0.004333415,0.022008194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013402089,0.0011593158,0.0006111402,0.0019535879,0.008258372,0.0028637797,0.0065135076,0.0068910276,0.00121048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007765986,0.0008155438,0.5463804,0.0002636302,0.00021504212,0.01158562,0.09301016,0.0012972733,0.004172111,0.1436515,0.14013231,0.05769984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013584475,0.00018484771,0.5673902,0.00031610328,0.0001534341,0.0013905248,0.20963858,0.0014091759,0.0023750393,0.0026060136,0.21421541,0.00018478882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.929984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9868672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07001603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062152244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.098413125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45094818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2333618217","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.150202","title":"<i>Carter</i> v. <i>Canada</i>: What’s next for physicians?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Declaration; Law; Political science; Assisted suicide; Criminal code; Medicine; Criminal law","score_opus":0.020323901755975263,"score_gpt":0.26395464850151357,"score_spread":0.2436307467455383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2333618217","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026040091,0.009809688,0.00028103337,0.9129738,0.005287077,0.00004125641,0.00035320836,0.000049500755,0.0686004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.046589546,0.007713363,0.00085414934,0.8875268,0.0019123018,0.000039137987,0.00021868965,0.00007179791,0.05507416],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950675,0.00042717042,0.00012168889,0.00033642407,0.0020399871,0.002007256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951717,0.0010780451,0.00017981465,0.000074779964,0.0019124111,0.0015831969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036114138,0.00040654695,0.00044139975,0.0011754519,0.020929985,0.0068237,0.0024213213,0.012985774,0.00923642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016282288,0.00051889144,0.00052791927,0.0016055141,0.0071844114,0.0027234424,0.0020724384,0.01880308,0.0015328564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013822373,0.0000068786544,0.0006720263,0.000043821092,0.0000056132412,0.00017231768,0.00093436154,0.000028311053,0.00010925439,0.035825938,0.95465034,0.0075373417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000265944,0.000014023971,0.002978095,0.00062008743,0.00002896267,0.00020465376,0.0040129954,0.000112970534,0.0003906442,0.009841976,0.9816784,0.000090541886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95415854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98665035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049933974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049933974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15593754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.362298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2333983203","doi":"10.2307/3504632","title":"10.2307/3504632","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; Law; Political science; Civil rights; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Public law","score_opus":0.008543035132900959,"score_gpt":0.2249097289358994,"score_spread":0.21636669380299844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2333983203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025702297,0.00028505494,0.00032460393,0.00031538325,0.00031943797,0.000047453006,0.0009175993,0.000560614,0.9969728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009754314,0.00029569792,0.0004142736,0.0003922651,0.00008488847,0.000032640608,0.0011813014,0.00032734676,0.9962961],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994295,0.000050930514,0.00004356899,0.00015037332,0.0002372195,0.00008829358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797744,0.0004478358,0.00007812242,0.00037167914,0.0005087284,0.00061618927],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086082355,0.0016024946,0.001124489,0.0023122423,0.0018545832,0.004984972,0.0018486372,0.0028170524,0.9856241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023259725,0.00081150903,0.0007417112,0.0028586877,0.0017951201,0.0061128074,0.004051195,0.0017472586,0.98618156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014442258,0.00013897252,0.0004208671,0.00035965518,0.000012183303,0.00016204115,0.000088384,0.00012895979,0.001194076,0.0064783394,0.6339732,0.35689896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024194836,0.000029071041,0.0007452674,0.00015885584,0.000005282313,0.00017163492,0.00011986506,0.00009672214,0.00017340491,0.0012100812,0.9972519,0.000013687369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004710252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052879388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014375925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011910485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001484217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020505428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335923003","doi":"10.18060/17656","title":"High Stakes: How to Define \"Disability\" in Medical Marijuana States in Light of the Americans with Disabilities Act, Canadian Law, and the Impact on Employers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indiana international & comparative law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.05860420647173557,"score_gpt":0.3501380052379137,"score_spread":0.29153379876617813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335923003","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02333899,0.023743328,0.012367548,0.5086323,0.0026957898,0.00030316878,0.00024000871,0.000049467628,0.42862937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86357,0.011613861,0.0057164496,0.0961773,0.0019796295,0.00039377014,0.00017717865,0.00006764663,0.020304125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9779624,0.011380846,0.0010855831,0.0010222467,0.005763823,0.0027850957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96655864,0.021307291,0.0016425485,0.0010608869,0.0072086616,0.0022219291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02762702,0.00058271666,0.0008033197,0.0048651933,0.017192751,0.013442533,0.0031533737,0.011080377,0.006131417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.065194264,0.0005622499,0.00059168495,0.003181915,0.037205894,0.017492117,0.008588096,0.013792588,0.00060774595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004923355,0.000019733407,0.0013729448,0.00003816959,0.000003967498,0.00015103348,0.0047969064,0.00009512872,0.000032954522,0.9577213,0.02686983,0.008893038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003555656,0.000031482206,0.007917718,0.0019035435,0.000029928979,0.0003473702,0.025346048,0.00080066494,0.00018630839,0.79584664,0.16746898,0.00008575823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25617695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3126695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74382305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023396082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04183462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50937164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338606940","doi":"","title":"Developments in Administrative Law: The 2008-2009 Term -- Contemplating Legislative (Im)Precision","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Deference; Law; Political science; Statute; Standard of review; Administrative law; Judicial review; Tribe; Legislature; Judicial deference; Statutory interpretation","score_opus":0.05553443847400083,"score_gpt":0.3102329400619607,"score_spread":0.2546985015879599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338606940","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15771785,0.014567723,0.004869889,0.3289201,0.002154974,0.00015586482,0.00029054028,0.000116094976,0.49120694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79045767,0.0041074464,0.0038336378,0.13466227,0.0012155016,0.00010648755,0.00012533403,0.00008652243,0.065405175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850995,0.0018216763,0.0006682372,0.0022305802,0.006414799,0.0037652657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846764,0.0073742904,0.0014026439,0.0009754851,0.004213105,0.0013581457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014619413,0.00020477577,0.00037628494,0.0012441865,0.017964503,0.025166761,0.002638519,0.013373766,0.0022159119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02521796,0.00066561124,0.0007420565,0.0016946937,0.024616076,0.005444083,0.004705317,0.015756804,0.00039334435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001737864,0.00002382393,0.002078404,0.000039767885,0.000006651657,0.0003774218,0.017770153,0.00026218462,0.0005736592,0.9400846,0.024991749,0.013774034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018531293,0.000056813424,0.013429629,0.00032251276,0.00002596045,0.0003261194,0.012481682,0.0004187749,0.0016095901,0.027491905,0.9437258,0.00009259473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7207166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83003074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7207166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08543984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08366125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6199123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338978280","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v46i2.4918","title":"The Implications of a Supreme Law Bill Of Rights for New Zealand Judicial Appointments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Bill of rights; Commission; Judicial review; Human rights","score_opus":0.03882758577520705,"score_gpt":0.2898765720509398,"score_spread":0.25104898627573274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338978280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098920636,0.0045242286,0.0067894435,0.2747216,0.0023137918,0.00042318765,0.00021817909,0.00009383336,0.6119951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8541329,0.002581006,0.007975912,0.03811934,0.0010964463,0.00020943374,0.000082336344,0.00005659364,0.09574602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9702204,0.006594487,0.0020009622,0.0034750206,0.010480117,0.007229123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796952,0.0092262495,0.0025623203,0.0015875798,0.004736141,0.0021925268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02279848,0.0002631595,0.00071047636,0.0016081532,0.01409263,0.014183769,0.0030257225,0.010582949,0.0064841337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07440099,0.00089884584,0.001032298,0.0013744712,0.018405667,0.0055805235,0.0047804145,0.017295897,0.0008430813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020591628,0.000017888713,0.00098628,0.000030746636,0.000005791415,0.0004803184,0.0036988957,0.0002181822,0.00035374283,0.97823584,0.009474914,0.0064768638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022785175,0.00019509817,0.02940811,0.0009622906,0.000100805904,0.0008271536,0.009814406,0.0022924312,0.00091871375,0.250009,0.7049438,0.00030042118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5124191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6636686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5124191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037240777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059982717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9809047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342044936","doi":"","title":"Louisiana's Civil-Law Notaries","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Legislation; Expansive; Estate; Business; Public law","score_opus":0.020785326393138695,"score_gpt":0.28735207424954795,"score_spread":0.26656674785640927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342044936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20088406,0.0033029367,0.0023142977,0.047812574,0.00057796284,0.00023762813,0.0011411036,0.00035489057,0.7433746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4030039,0.0013745769,0.0015319474,0.007952442,0.00011478839,0.00007631657,0.00031166928,0.00003876786,0.58559567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988176,0.00015292235,0.000051018105,0.00016518644,0.00033689232,0.00047645372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967519,0.00081054744,0.00028834923,0.00020456153,0.001364191,0.00058039493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012950506,0.00020193045,0.00016447878,0.0007154049,0.009552431,0.0035773218,0.00069939514,0.0016339865,0.01490516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002793816,0.00025144534,0.00022868278,0.0005223358,0.0023177422,0.0011447612,0.0018543254,0.003147382,0.0013232059],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007135945,0.00017162247,0.034962386,0.00015869063,0.00002841614,0.0015449324,0.012202234,0.0005445279,0.003471627,0.6367601,0.1897182,0.12036581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008073863,0.000039463586,0.021687008,0.000090187226,0.000010912004,0.00015616606,0.0018689055,0.00039284508,0.0006421545,0.003853835,0.97121775,0.00003278955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3872467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6420722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3872467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011976469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027741788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7699853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342501057","doi":"","title":"Tribunal Jurisdiction Over Charter Remedies: Now You See it, Now You Don't","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Jurisdiction; Charter; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Legislative intent; Legislature; Mandate; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Original jurisdiction; Statutory law","score_opus":0.013246779382523775,"score_gpt":0.27583513220765404,"score_spread":0.26258835282513027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342501057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10232664,0.0060010166,0.012888115,0.24960867,0.0019273338,0.00017418154,0.0003486042,0.00028926745,0.62643623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8563488,0.0007678636,0.002837321,0.056934845,0.00035990193,0.0001072323,0.00006424125,0.00007200183,0.0825077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874451,0.0029013043,0.0005065901,0.002244211,0.0039383206,0.0029643893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943456,0.0032642828,0.0005767293,0.0005515174,0.0007766768,0.0004852643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008927236,0.00033443543,0.00062756805,0.00087508664,0.010498989,0.011443405,0.0023840114,0.013545039,0.008532628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020533623,0.0005427206,0.0009170487,0.0008686367,0.013353345,0.008024232,0.0042762063,0.014124724,0.0014216488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031719825,0.000040182636,0.00117149,0.000048420767,0.000011958607,0.0003079463,0.004641975,0.0001536659,0.0006527983,0.9395829,0.04062238,0.012734577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015266624,0.0002570065,0.010696892,0.0004964865,0.00013439792,0.0007862628,0.010724737,0.0017632602,0.00446344,0.3487057,0.6215408,0.00027829723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04780575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09122743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9933757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066242605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013364828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095054984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344325849","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1020","title":"Goliath Arisen: Taking Aim at the Health Care Regime in Auton","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.029603809876643825,"score_gpt":0.37182756326721056,"score_spread":0.3422237533905667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344325849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49252418,0.0023489383,0.00053052424,0.10235804,0.00065361726,0.00008805616,0.00013472675,0.000025432057,0.40133655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8906321,0.00041976213,0.00020947674,0.019197926,0.00012943303,0.00002608033,0.000027578282,0.00001278866,0.089344956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980387,0.00034315445,0.000026827536,0.0001449127,0.0002394629,0.0012069503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889624,0.00032715735,0.000097906755,0.000062253384,0.00023653012,0.00037998683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019186009,0.00015846734,0.00017882632,0.00062823744,0.013345375,0.004931109,0.0006739422,0.0038907402,0.011000262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003307914,0.00015834106,0.00019347809,0.00045973208,0.010669887,0.001378557,0.0039623887,0.003910289,0.00046198067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055934295,0.000040889405,0.012301512,0.00005940694,0.000010131229,0.0019770695,0.06258371,0.0002863081,0.0005497779,0.87369704,0.03337742,0.015060798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005555264,0.000078095625,0.047503367,0.0004491194,0.000024170986,0.0006576778,0.10209333,0.0007107552,0.0008865811,0.06261682,0.7848568,0.00006773809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3969473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6394441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3969473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027534164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020765398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7892736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344334150","doi":"","title":"'On the Date of the Partial Wind-Up': Monsanto V. Ontario (Superintendent of Financial Services)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Pension; Financial services; Economics; Business; Finance; Financial system","score_opus":0.009558125926525423,"score_gpt":0.24503182632228587,"score_spread":0.23547370039576046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344334150","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044144087,0.004493228,0.0010949686,0.6239197,0.0032372277,0.0001519688,0.0016054342,0.00010663918,0.32124665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26941064,0.0019848475,0.0006065778,0.3894389,0.000940526,0.00008241315,0.00031886034,0.00007678395,0.33714056],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973761,0.00018249798,0.00006249698,0.00024721617,0.00092838117,0.0012033582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982455,0.00037912163,0.00012735938,0.00006642211,0.00080709445,0.00037464075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020531388,0.00030871338,0.0003125565,0.00063006295,0.025381228,0.0050654,0.002097069,0.020998292,0.00928976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007045124,0.0005893402,0.0006351664,0.0010007775,0.00558326,0.0021305943,0.0016517233,0.01100324,0.0012212716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007933765,0.000018303484,0.0052222996,0.00008443886,0.000017718112,0.0020954132,0.022751505,0.00010093073,0.0008753999,0.14997439,0.8115128,0.0072675017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048028094,0.00002662686,0.017411578,0.00024459697,0.00005765455,0.00044631318,0.012016218,0.00017511728,0.0009586135,0.0067654876,0.96175146,0.00009825549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9693266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99127007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036915354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036915354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048977878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26784092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345275768","doi":"","title":"Chevron Corp. v. Yaiguaje: Canadian Law and the New Global Economic and Environmental Realities","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Chevron (anatomy); Environmental law; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Geology","score_opus":0.004588649092674444,"score_gpt":0.2190748999977112,"score_spread":0.21448625090503676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345275768","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070145205,0.01314266,0.00087350956,0.16454846,0.00054996915,0.000050500938,0.0009631105,0.00006171816,0.74966484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7886452,0.008835018,0.001111176,0.02023148,0.00020152166,0.00002445318,0.00027346582,0.000039623505,0.18063796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980281,0.00012354087,0.00003010751,0.00016843849,0.00080868445,0.0008410929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986994,0.00030382088,0.000077543846,0.000047129342,0.00067365635,0.0001985003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013476755,0.00041088084,0.00021961746,0.0017813941,0.014273323,0.008082254,0.0011107674,0.004185512,0.014094239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043295263,0.00020121913,0.00033561734,0.0030513057,0.0067941975,0.0022079328,0.0017560091,0.0035129718,0.00047954606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003322106,0.000016931788,0.0056598843,0.00007272759,0.000011393218,0.00042209987,0.0040125004,0.0005355539,0.00024616456,0.8458302,0.12541977,0.01773958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004793054,0.000023448762,0.031173099,0.000513287,0.0000948291,0.00030530858,0.016116142,0.0013792877,0.0006898481,0.101466164,0.8480509,0.00013977938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9906763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99578446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.080990426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.080990426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1285206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58762944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345860747","doi":"","title":"St. John's Holdings v. Two Electronics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.014678228177880044,"score_gpt":0.28039365544863765,"score_spread":0.2657154272707576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345860747","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051384594,0.0022962522,0.0013581219,0.05147137,0.0013757295,0.00009557726,0.00088332966,0.00014380724,0.8909913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30551597,0.0011369349,0.00077948876,0.042758834,0.00034815562,0.000071030445,0.0003068429,0.00007050169,0.6490122],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984768,0.00008956862,0.00005787442,0.00015895134,0.0007028387,0.0005139521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981906,0.0010393509,0.00010674046,0.00009284887,0.00037305927,0.00019743975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010253364,0.00035230507,0.00021182276,0.0010191726,0.01166018,0.0043733083,0.00084377,0.005489059,0.03370735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042477925,0.00056866073,0.0004760494,0.000996912,0.0017830484,0.0015899878,0.0014444751,0.0051857755,0.0037360592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019547516,0.00008976517,0.007322756,0.00014309387,0.000027409329,0.003807641,0.0033046517,0.00043878477,0.0034167331,0.39003634,0.5503346,0.040882666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009030157,0.00013778158,0.018501628,0.0004243749,0.00009715062,0.00095811,0.0024266043,0.0010717391,0.008915174,0.029058013,0.9382092,0.0001099567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.111911744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31601045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.111911744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044375304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006967889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22252071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346636438","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511596780.007","title":"Moral Authority in English and American Abortion Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutionalism; Abortion; Constitutional right; Political science; Constitutional law; Abortion law; Supreme court; Sociology; Population; Family planning; Politics","score_opus":0.017764901221628215,"score_gpt":0.24666138140816662,"score_spread":0.2288964801865384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346636438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07384058,0.01747691,0.0038580226,0.0809455,0.0007368096,0.00003465523,0.0000538035,0.000021174967,0.8230324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92693585,0.0035383627,0.0012537965,0.024212187,0.0005920826,0.000086377986,0.000031501382,0.00002138731,0.043328438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99334127,0.0030628194,0.00022011895,0.0006036628,0.0016396171,0.0011325929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963218,0.0026296682,0.0002576748,0.00012354934,0.00043282652,0.00023447737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054587102,0.00022461479,0.00030788098,0.0010101704,0.0104297595,0.007735143,0.0008968325,0.005055696,0.0029381642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005944546,0.00034541963,0.00031277502,0.0006217672,0.032819487,0.0059145554,0.0038178295,0.006957092,0.00032715857],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025441475,0.000005148483,0.0000766054,0.0000060065017,4.512031e-7,0.00003033137,0.0044963444,0.00001538596,0.000023259507,0.99339104,0.0010748325,0.0008781521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000405167,0.000040079434,0.0024594364,0.0003250079,0.000012566053,0.00020894226,0.012074812,0.00035171406,0.00026427908,0.5984899,0.38568622,0.000046519835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045467764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041614726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045467764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012469295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007160185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09047145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2359817729","doi":"","title":"Irish American Lesbian Gains Canadian Immigrant Status","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Lesbian; Irish; Political science; Legal status; Immigration law; Gender studies; Law; Demographic economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.013009293907134284,"score_gpt":0.3053727218628849,"score_spread":0.2923634279557506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2359817729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2263108,0.0009125353,0.0002961413,0.05014593,0.0009106253,0.0000874159,0.00042371743,0.000085242995,0.7208276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41698465,0.0010510765,0.00047641477,0.020928912,0.00007775844,0.000029535853,0.0002194461,0.000059672086,0.56017256],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986179,0.00008663011,0.000020298097,0.00008709517,0.0003550649,0.00083295204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879503,0.000057264686,0.000026664988,0.00003708516,0.0006007028,0.00048325633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014222418,0.0002837497,0.00022447137,0.0009336451,0.019939482,0.0039032432,0.0006978911,0.0017991345,0.026282158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024492564,0.0001587394,0.0002813664,0.0007698059,0.002217092,0.0008418486,0.0028325054,0.0030366827,0.0023281379],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025450526,0.00023491548,0.053373583,0.00006427188,0.000023022782,0.0071158577,0.06918636,0.0002244254,0.0024988183,0.25493127,0.48754117,0.12455181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026942202,0.00006412803,0.027148344,0.00018167292,0.000025237454,0.000835235,0.09506735,0.00017777058,0.00085211475,0.002460271,0.87308913,0.00007183026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9692314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9892517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030768573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020903287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04533971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15166467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2367629654","doi":"","title":"Not Out There: Why Outdoor Smoking Bans Finally Pass Constitutional Muster","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Secondhand smoke; Environmental health; Law; Business; Medicine","score_opus":0.11790511293036299,"score_gpt":0.34706352026548243,"score_spread":0.22915840733511944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2367629654","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15598096,0.0013442856,0.010111554,0.2314386,0.0022988978,0.00018529125,0.00030485072,0.00025847807,0.5980771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87815124,0.0002152438,0.0019109978,0.05496345,0.000844134,0.00011076948,0.00006233631,0.00015036472,0.063591555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98882806,0.0023340823,0.00034397442,0.0023594582,0.0019735296,0.0041609397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865892,0.008324798,0.0006776522,0.001450566,0.0018632886,0.0010944009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0127364015,0.00036781968,0.0008608527,0.00089800695,0.012360327,0.010227767,0.0030796488,0.026877748,0.020481283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03197268,0.00077921007,0.0013226942,0.0005986291,0.014616102,0.005665085,0.004380034,0.017160334,0.0023612056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003647843,0.0000622887,0.0018702827,0.000020200747,0.000029807168,0.00030309256,0.002912244,0.00012086478,0.0004892695,0.9657038,0.023616936,0.00483475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017324173,0.00009673855,0.010949664,0.00024716934,0.00015839594,0.0002958962,0.0074719233,0.001334334,0.0028112081,0.78735256,0.18897933,0.00012946234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038457595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058252707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038457595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052583627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010900096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076467514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W23790115","doi":"10.29173/alr193","title":"Recent Regulatory and Legislative Developments of Interest to Oil and Gas Lawyers","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Calgary Laboratory Services; Suncor Energy (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Variety (cybernetics); Commission; Energy law; Political science; Public administration; Business; Key (lock); Fossil fuel; Law; Environmental law; Engineering","score_opus":0.042440730634729036,"score_gpt":0.31896632749318915,"score_spread":0.2765255968584601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W23790115","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08408175,0.2499732,0.002848281,0.36622795,0.0044430904,0.000110590074,0.0005213834,0.00020315476,0.2915907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53217536,0.2263466,0.0048609143,0.12975477,0.01074028,0.00006694302,0.0009893439,0.00010215343,0.09496355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99190265,0.001301204,0.0004538089,0.0008068029,0.0040485444,0.0014869941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96031874,0.017560951,0.005699975,0.0005785403,0.014017251,0.0018245433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010253609,0.00018574749,0.0003471055,0.003069405,0.0034767932,0.007968981,0.0016662326,0.0056245066,0.0056325216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023976319,0.0005075601,0.00037879817,0.0058554844,0.0048905434,0.0021510168,0.0010580241,0.0045554456,0.0006214923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001950303,0.00024506295,0.011939059,0.0023412064,0.000065038155,0.001626984,0.008630301,0.002291734,0.0044352934,0.42602584,0.20577596,0.33642852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019466155,0.00005927109,0.024405532,0.00046749323,0.000034796652,0.0004026926,0.0026957789,0.0002675498,0.0010733585,0.006520103,0.9639936,0.000060464547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21608925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46106666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78391075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025329532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028210241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42966294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2394661373","doi":"10.29173/alr1409","title":"Clones, Controversy, and Criminal Law: A Comment on the Proposal for Legislation Governing Assisted Human Reproduction","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lawson Health Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Reproduction; Criminal law; Law; Government (linguistics); Mechanism (biology); Political science; Government regulation; Reproductive technology; Human reproduction; Law and economics; Sociology; Biology; Genetics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05611255327318252,"score_gpt":0.3423504418763614,"score_spread":0.28623788860317884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2394661373","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016589194,0.004098862,0.0002613308,0.9790025,0.0053446176,0.000034154946,0.00010166304,0.00003239346,0.009465588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009419264,0.0014011025,0.00028855854,0.9709627,0.004983354,0.000058469337,0.000040096842,0.000033876717,0.012812478],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857292,0.0028921794,0.001082863,0.0022481403,0.0052693887,0.0027781844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95664245,0.03382937,0.001226407,0.000772391,0.0054137427,0.0021156468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021717642,0.0012232868,0.0018023314,0.002175644,0.023500906,0.011035989,0.009990991,0.14261709,0.005458604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049038447,0.0019000925,0.0029268113,0.0037193384,0.018933859,0.0068826955,0.0038070162,0.06459626,0.0021924367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056748922,0.000030093805,0.0006616102,0.000111219364,0.000024695892,0.00073969143,0.0028653217,0.00022937964,0.00031526925,0.11221976,0.87871426,0.0040319166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002263519,0.0000854942,0.00397598,0.0006395835,0.00018466006,0.00040471833,0.0038410362,0.00067752163,0.00084216386,0.03403691,0.95482624,0.00025928268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4213326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5629486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4213326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025044072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053343862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8377603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2401018369","doi":"","title":"Equity's Maxims as a Concept in Canadian Jurisprudence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Equity (law); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.015532785515953934,"score_gpt":0.3321780412997231,"score_spread":0.3166452557837692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2401018369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08707756,0.0052697146,0.016177263,0.03053683,0.0003275129,0.00009164419,0.0002003903,0.000060400693,0.86025864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798232,0.00064633606,0.003505936,0.0006589519,0.0000938017,0.000026946442,0.000024184737,0.00002595698,0.015194688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912689,0.0021414745,0.00029616206,0.0008955447,0.0034637784,0.0019342549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99302703,0.003455545,0.0002603891,0.00035237396,0.0022178078,0.00068675005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007613957,0.0005881097,0.00086463627,0.0046888446,0.016853334,0.013869184,0.0024360279,0.0039484887,0.0056998343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01807964,0.00053905504,0.00068381743,0.0062481835,0.036544744,0.005619208,0.0034187702,0.0066746133,0.00023602687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002127836,0.0000016181702,0.000056526278,0.000004532509,0.0000010533913,0.0000069256616,0.0013104249,0.00012694261,0.000012088005,0.9963833,0.000721311,0.001373034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014975048,0.000007771643,0.0020784105,0.00008641328,0.000019506404,0.000035251505,0.0024088807,0.0015155247,0.00009241045,0.94926906,0.044431247,0.00004045218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8840108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8950433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11598921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11135917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08060144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8079711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414443586","doi":"","title":"Private v. public. Canada's Supreme Court decision shakes fundamentals of system.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Supreme Court Decisions; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02770067040335001,"score_gpt":0.2504139590335681,"score_spread":0.2227132886302181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2414443586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048181448,0.0061610346,0.0054629724,0.25237644,0.0013330795,0.00027894086,0.0065081627,0.00042000643,0.6792779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62845844,0.0029054505,0.0034190787,0.081616424,0.00047649973,0.00014077732,0.0010610678,0.0001369281,0.28178534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911165,0.00056476064,0.0001693479,0.0004807477,0.0045578307,0.0031108367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99161035,0.0023834826,0.00029228767,0.00026578907,0.0043870388,0.0010609381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036062307,0.0004351734,0.0005849776,0.0021731486,0.018207755,0.009187211,0.002592165,0.00960785,0.015871646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016678806,0.0007027673,0.00090216805,0.002704409,0.0052775554,0.002699413,0.0022066012,0.006775582,0.0014793659],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000932576,0.000026666183,0.0041611474,0.00011486492,0.00004149421,0.00038292469,0.002084671,0.0005813941,0.000532829,0.59660345,0.37647745,0.018899826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033292538,0.00008264398,0.04031674,0.00052337867,0.00032200894,0.000251381,0.0040542292,0.0033216388,0.0026319504,0.16775323,0.7801664,0.00024343822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98745745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99454737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9340757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06592432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15833814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4783166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W243121698","doi":"","title":"The Impaired Dual System Framework of United States Drunk-Driving Law: How International Perspectives Yield More Sober Results","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sobriety; Law enforcement; Law; Enforcement; Criminology; Driving under the influence; Poison control; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Psychiatry; Environmental health","score_opus":0.011733558702517596,"score_gpt":0.2780547868322283,"score_spread":0.2663212281297107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W243121698","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046246447,0.02105895,0.012580869,0.31349066,0.0030766868,0.00007563984,0.00015608856,0.00016454994,0.60315007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91932905,0.0075523625,0.008913093,0.035962675,0.0012551514,0.00016454146,0.00010216017,0.000121669844,0.026599191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98835665,0.0071816845,0.00032271136,0.00090725365,0.0018021663,0.0014294791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99015874,0.0046166363,0.00091557886,0.0007926146,0.002558629,0.00095771835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012130639,0.0005774301,0.0004128467,0.0038646152,0.009099584,0.0213962,0.0016145464,0.0061648916,0.01013975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01550942,0.00035742542,0.0006259027,0.0026657232,0.044087257,0.011646159,0.0066293394,0.007722764,0.0009838495],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008745212,0.000014038391,0.0012936343,0.00003103035,0.0000044331427,0.00013341171,0.005994974,0.000090434856,0.00004217174,0.97558653,0.009650724,0.007149884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016782504,0.000068000125,0.0058491644,0.0010617875,0.00003122023,0.00038430723,0.029417662,0.00099803,0.00033211237,0.742095,0.21968405,0.00006182272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01861451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024679448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0213962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009934515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01046996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072080314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461841409","doi":"10.3138/uram.26.3.220","title":"Ultimate Justice and The American Legal System","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ultimate Reality and Meaning","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024419565148632673,"score_gpt":0.31060045016850446,"score_spread":0.28618088501987177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461841409","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2048801,0.013492844,0.016008113,0.16098778,0.00055866473,0.00006325561,0.00018389983,0.000073010764,0.6037523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910273,0.0014518544,0.0010222034,0.0024220764,0.00025697346,0.00003909723,0.000027287211,0.000010338613,0.0037429463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924245,0.0047837044,0.0001704617,0.0006357755,0.0011795512,0.0008060128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98890114,0.007632559,0.0009242172,0.0005691568,0.0010688379,0.0009040644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007900288,0.0003453661,0.00060048,0.0033711917,0.01013328,0.011938718,0.0012449323,0.0052428837,0.004792298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016437026,0.00038080895,0.0004613331,0.0034494593,0.051215045,0.009609384,0.0041194824,0.0068188314,0.00030140814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034058155,0.000010256611,0.00020829284,0.000006767714,0.0000021169951,0.000009811616,0.0012725537,0.00011893912,0.000014306237,0.9963929,0.00061053335,0.001350165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056479857,0.0000048446354,0.0006969761,0.000022633049,0.0000033381039,0.0000082535635,0.0010196477,0.00021507556,0.0000133942485,0.9926059,0.0053984723,0.000005792499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01857931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023051564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01857931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075633232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012110296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05487603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2462065632","doi":"","title":"Check List for Legislators: Towards a Canadian Approach to End-of-Life Choices.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Parliament; Legislation; Human rights; Law; Political science; Transparency (behavior); Supreme court; Assisted suicide; Politics","score_opus":0.05512585813284403,"score_gpt":0.2773274205096741,"score_spread":0.2222015623768301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2462065632","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004136342,0.005044345,0.020254634,0.49587193,0.0052606077,0.0003250291,0.0007390936,0.00054725504,0.4678207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23163396,0.007162682,0.06114602,0.2727066,0.0014830731,0.00059841794,0.0010014048,0.0007827998,0.42348507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9793993,0.0046132733,0.0006103631,0.0015671358,0.010251557,0.0035583568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9711095,0.0072298916,0.00077402627,0.00089070626,0.013948978,0.0060468526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023313288,0.00050354865,0.00059469807,0.0038571404,0.030243985,0.01423945,0.0043470995,0.010085268,0.029687237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046866294,0.0006759327,0.00077157625,0.0035028195,0.013903882,0.0057844818,0.0068817437,0.010639739,0.0042565125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000078826615,0.00002322161,0.0012820034,0.000052825908,0.0000060987645,0.00017542428,0.0069415937,0.00018487811,0.00013062697,0.57149494,0.37617126,0.043529276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008618717,0.000007024712,0.0017786351,0.00020376511,0.000009754967,0.00005406292,0.0047168485,0.0003317407,0.00011831195,0.03308582,0.9596249,0.00006047996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91632366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96582174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08367634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0559369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21893235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40585256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2462788911","doi":"","title":"Supreme Court denies leave to appeal in medical marijuana charter challenge.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Possession (linguistics); Philosophy","score_opus":0.0490595872218848,"score_gpt":0.27067366526851017,"score_spread":0.22161407804662536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2462788911","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022934312,0.0039087906,0.0015030232,0.65542895,0.0089679845,0.00017457012,0.0009091492,0.00026272467,0.3059105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23680186,0.0018402331,0.0013542054,0.5103036,0.00739564,0.00024184254,0.00048748913,0.00013581372,0.24143927],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865828,0.0012993705,0.0005534293,0.0013274263,0.0060009626,0.0042359293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835397,0.009975638,0.0006010958,0.0006953873,0.0032735646,0.0019146366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010720361,0.0004824651,0.0008747106,0.0011331933,0.018218523,0.008687521,0.003744666,0.039834436,0.011579524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042850662,0.0007934614,0.0011896373,0.001029515,0.006675745,0.00268477,0.0040241578,0.02152222,0.0032299105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010236771,0.00006177925,0.0017259157,0.00004708899,0.000030337218,0.0015870158,0.0023678297,0.00019323561,0.0006883745,0.34196734,0.64101833,0.010210506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015567664,0.00009284138,0.006671371,0.00031984152,0.00009198825,0.0003855004,0.0017892581,0.0008904222,0.0008800337,0.045332313,0.94327545,0.000115297495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3430588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6057973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6569412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017322045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048599157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6821239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2463543593","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2783895","title":"Dead Hands, Living Trees, Historic Compromises: The Senate Reform and Supreme Court Act References Brings the Originalism Debate to Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.012233293648170801,"score_gpt":0.2444069167170582,"score_spread":0.2321736230688874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2463543593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061531242,0.005317265,0.002026275,0.26929268,0.0010901869,0.000033869383,0.00022695815,0.000039657185,0.6604419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8966513,0.0015846113,0.00052107655,0.026648466,0.0005436001,0.000022175265,0.00004493492,0.00007401949,0.073909774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907607,0.003080658,0.00021347815,0.0010531319,0.0021371597,0.0027549157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897143,0.00524142,0.000549287,0.00087901327,0.0025957767,0.0010201811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009626063,0.00033295326,0.0007071414,0.001566753,0.038152754,0.019598497,0.002836395,0.014538374,0.012210375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023214305,0.0004509064,0.0004913009,0.003051867,0.04153871,0.0059025567,0.004660612,0.016268149,0.00055671175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008287141,0.000007677681,0.0003764681,0.000013170934,0.000004610716,0.000064897344,0.009527737,0.000094747375,0.000021456173,0.9659945,0.020738533,0.0031478314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036571095,0.000016172366,0.0035261617,0.00039623244,0.00006075558,0.00010586114,0.038752597,0.0006054086,0.0004564822,0.346196,0.6097524,0.00009525763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8030067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9220636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19699329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043931436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06734419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3963068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2464221961","doi":"","title":"Clarifying the Doctrine of Rectification in Canada: A Comment on Shafron v. KRG Insurance Brokers (Western) Inc.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Business; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.01446423488740496,"score_gpt":0.2596307595832642,"score_spread":0.24516652469585926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2464221961","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023091003,0.0037766884,0.0014307111,0.884899,0.0032531435,0.00015384138,0.0007786846,0.00013919048,0.082477786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1423361,0.0020535595,0.0016603544,0.8095578,0.0022473775,0.00010437203,0.00015912284,0.00010065101,0.041780658],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855063,0.0010158148,0.0007606615,0.0015515658,0.00570606,0.0054595047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97906953,0.009703474,0.0010190633,0.00057762477,0.0077249743,0.0019053967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011669146,0.0008316277,0.0013702719,0.0015845266,0.030141251,0.011652637,0.009085913,0.08271742,0.005145183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037394464,0.0014487754,0.002559238,0.0031169192,0.013757808,0.004598539,0.0036809773,0.038810935,0.0009317917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011943648,0.00004587434,0.003494679,0.00013152041,0.00006323515,0.00133743,0.009914157,0.0007002434,0.00076550664,0.40879428,0.56788766,0.00674598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051798485,0.00009601542,0.013854639,0.0008386318,0.00041683577,0.0005435882,0.012361726,0.003713072,0.002485955,0.056894433,0.90765774,0.00061938824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9773375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.988379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08271742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07562622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21464579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54870915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465691456","doi":"","title":"St. John's University School of Law St. John's Law Scholarship Repository","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.015159421075503176,"score_gpt":0.2521878395926588,"score_spread":0.23702841851715561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2465691456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005379824,0.0097780945,0.00084357976,0.0282395,0.003102374,0.00017190172,0.0046130493,0.0008205677,0.94705105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022671595,0.006860961,0.00092830963,0.0020416416,0.0006118538,0.00008523357,0.0008669607,0.00018860024,0.9657448],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984017,0.00018631191,0.00011207199,0.00020022882,0.00095663813,0.00014299068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99515355,0.0011049416,0.00020692451,0.0006038516,0.0020195358,0.0009112115],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001289811,0.0004698936,0.0010551121,0.003118616,0.0058232606,0.00892603,0.0013402534,0.004282202,0.3307111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007866734,0.0008363924,0.00026331714,0.0036295007,0.0023672667,0.0026408187,0.0033738648,0.0030760805,0.09073946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023370847,0.00005334219,0.0009825686,0.00028623026,0.000014470244,0.00037940076,0.00083839096,0.00012552827,0.0002602108,0.04284863,0.90273005,0.05145769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011383119,0.00001592361,0.0028690011,0.000721723,0.000010516766,0.00013118876,0.0005666679,0.00022710422,0.00042506173,0.009505915,0.98549217,0.000023239418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04477781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17271318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6692889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037009001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0102627305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9546594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W24771791","doi":"10.1093/bja/aeu123","title":"Carter v. Canada (Attorney General): Canadian Courts Revisit the Criminalization of Assisted Suicide, 59 Wayne L. Rev. 561 (2013)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Anaesthesia","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.01943920825066627,"score_gpt":0.25021001268375603,"score_spread":0.23077080443308975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W24771791","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032265194,0.050167296,0.0025711295,0.56062907,0.004781185,0.00036790146,0.0017937971,0.00024219666,0.3471822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26716453,0.022960985,0.0030876969,0.53567123,0.0013968273,0.00028273335,0.00046355178,0.0001508572,0.16882168],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908958,0.0008430955,0.0002532436,0.00057503924,0.003696539,0.0037362038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927729,0.0026009618,0.00025062583,0.00013943815,0.003028356,0.0012076651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058546877,0.0007882336,0.00040826295,0.0021366533,0.03319201,0.009259396,0.0032897461,0.023366483,0.0073775207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015649341,0.0010839842,0.0012469455,0.0025774094,0.007407518,0.0029412182,0.0031685096,0.014995268,0.000849918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000566119,0.00003413306,0.0047871186,0.00012916989,0.000036988808,0.001203284,0.0056550037,0.00059863785,0.0005562258,0.3417318,0.62457246,0.020638496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015471413,0.00004749064,0.017656062,0.0010508238,0.00019625036,0.0003369983,0.0067433827,0.0014822601,0.0008179439,0.028622195,0.9425469,0.0003449416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9910217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0822071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0822071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2287829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.596457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2490563910","doi":"10.5342/michhistrevi.38.1.0001","title":"Michigan Ceded: Why and Wherefore?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Historical Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering","score_opus":0.03220956045452139,"score_gpt":0.30651475323354843,"score_spread":0.27430519277902704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2490563910","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006353375,0.7509317,0.00015605093,0.13331445,0.0037368718,0.0000046196246,0.0003476071,0.000022522683,0.10513291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16663449,0.6843023,0.00030640463,0.02969089,0.011693283,0.000035680714,0.0004965017,0.00007313789,0.10676735],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995484,0.00017392742,0.000020768606,0.00006799212,0.000110610876,0.00007833282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995845,0.00015098267,0.00007252682,0.00001933758,0.00009258848,0.00007998756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049409264,0.00031613206,0.00026488435,0.0011020498,0.0033909287,0.0048428606,0.00062996236,0.0023109468,0.015303329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014360086,0.00024538866,0.00015224294,0.0026865974,0.0025652046,0.0038803527,0.001156485,0.0026853867,0.002382296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028264403,0.000016349915,0.0023796374,0.00062874664,0.000024552934,0.00030870127,0.0061659375,0.0000913795,0.000160075,0.13781595,0.7790015,0.07337891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014094143,0.0000056420145,0.0036129386,0.0011191454,0.0000070118967,0.00009888204,0.001670378,0.00003071668,0.000061355575,0.0027792098,0.9906064,0.0000068593763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054851532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12465456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054851532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057573523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034662602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10906452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2494567957","doi":"10.29173/alr367","title":"Recent Regulatory and Legislative Developments of Interest to Oil and Gas Lawyers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Fossil fuel; Petroleum industry; Energy law; Political science; Business; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Environmental law; Engineering","score_opus":0.09678805675881301,"score_gpt":0.33863822203446475,"score_spread":0.24185016527565173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2494567957","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037975624,0.42667088,0.002156745,0.26690367,0.0072861207,0.00009563432,0.00045290863,0.00019397141,0.25826448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29228932,0.47326303,0.005281513,0.11798467,0.012538854,0.000072320094,0.0009338005,0.000109147506,0.09752739],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99250424,0.0011602083,0.00034662435,0.00053360156,0.0042957435,0.0011595828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96274954,0.015103276,0.0041540153,0.0005226972,0.015953518,0.0015169439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010587888,0.0002353922,0.0003836804,0.003974993,0.0035231253,0.0075823814,0.0015338705,0.004374411,0.00579411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022904873,0.00053930946,0.0003540397,0.0071669444,0.005196805,0.0019120341,0.0011605313,0.0050794105,0.0006441852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014169706,0.00021136594,0.008385294,0.003218205,0.000069351525,0.0012608618,0.0060521998,0.0017644571,0.0034128549,0.35015118,0.26059282,0.3647397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012848559,0.000042737134,0.013795395,0.0005089197,0.000033626246,0.00019829717,0.0020693813,0.00013385034,0.0005846415,0.0041625984,0.9784142,0.000043536933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36517522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6856232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63482475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02629754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050104454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7260993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498238348","doi":"","title":"Pursuing the Perfect Mother: Why America's Criminalization of Maternal Substance Abuse is Not the Answer- A Compartive Legal Analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Criminology; Substance abuse; Psychology; Substance use; Child custody; Political science; Law; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.02418125322418489,"score_gpt":0.3038653782064632,"score_spread":0.2796841249822783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2498238348","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.099425405,0.020217787,0.0020485586,0.54611987,0.0011441142,0.000028183347,0.00009924976,0.000040023162,0.33087677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9162041,0.010571824,0.00082153606,0.05966893,0.0009786229,0.00003922442,0.000059766535,0.000042348012,0.01161373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950531,0.0022616952,0.00010513392,0.0004982066,0.0010113905,0.0010705756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934283,0.0039961496,0.00065969204,0.00030379565,0.0012336682,0.0003782975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052698306,0.00021843733,0.00029927687,0.0025572097,0.012696244,0.009328705,0.0014992423,0.00657573,0.0034242822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011834018,0.0002238635,0.00036168486,0.0017627724,0.035085544,0.0074267313,0.0027261493,0.0067482237,0.00023191649],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000083180685,0.000021238176,0.0023691826,0.00003337282,0.0000081134785,0.00032190626,0.017561916,0.000070272275,0.000053820157,0.9608675,0.008611241,0.0100731505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032950946,0.00007433312,0.017377298,0.0010674614,0.00006810127,0.0008243906,0.14935984,0.0006382315,0.0005526737,0.409044,0.42087552,0.00008519189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20755295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2709184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20755295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017464072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015198873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41268975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503483160","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511527432.014","title":"Changing the Path of the Law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Surprise; Law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Path dependence; Phenomenon; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; History; Political science; Neoclassical economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.019881765680081556,"score_gpt":0.21014143948762617,"score_spread":0.1902596738075446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2503483160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01183833,0.007946397,0.018850809,0.119541995,0.0018605557,0.000040932013,0.00007066438,0.000106210784,0.83974403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6347546,0.0070027453,0.013447378,0.028925356,0.0006708376,0.00007280592,0.000071313276,0.00017289253,0.31488213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980964,0.00062028406,0.000041022067,0.00035691066,0.0006477024,0.0002375934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877495,0.0005833438,0.00006364748,0.00015147438,0.0002964636,0.00013001656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020265519,0.00017019472,0.00015769889,0.00061381725,0.0031870068,0.005575519,0.00061091833,0.002251621,0.008864457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055740494,0.00018112962,0.00015344427,0.00041473575,0.0145323565,0.009520061,0.0025800634,0.0049777706,0.0013088656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016881785,0.0000024132783,0.000032546126,0.0000061041073,3.8588306e-7,0.000009841918,0.00069723296,0.000037958256,0.000028943452,0.984262,0.009260315,0.005660615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032045173,0.000008224378,0.0001528983,0.00007431484,0.000001493772,0.000043387914,0.0012012421,0.0002666023,0.00014922969,0.579936,0.41815642,0.0000069809703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010085849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012601415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010085849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072573344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067257695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052655816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2504631741","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107416031.019","title":"Attorney-General of Canada on Behalf of the United States of America <i>v</i>. Khadr","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Reports","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Respondent; Political science; Law; Jurisdiction; Misconduct; Terrorism; State (computer science); Human rights; Economic Justice; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.021638512689180052,"score_gpt":0.28310135020311034,"score_spread":0.2614628375139303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2504631741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011697838,0.0045263385,0.0009400937,0.084411584,0.0071136206,0.0009079878,0.007685894,0.0009930547,0.8817235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03414278,0.0013880858,0.0005755184,0.016842734,0.00029472457,0.000083566476,0.0010570857,0.0001666155,0.94544894],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610245,0.00012543873,0.00016628997,0.00049483177,0.0017241291,0.0013868863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99058074,0.000879735,0.000253757,0.00027880465,0.0066197133,0.001387335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014983066,0.00062783726,0.0005999151,0.0015226767,0.012548004,0.0050291773,0.002146989,0.005507276,0.15009992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007376474,0.00068466447,0.00037948386,0.0022338894,0.0018277596,0.0011419589,0.0012918249,0.0047274022,0.01906464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027127877,0.000026829834,0.001867066,0.000051416027,0.000009205568,0.00026638506,0.0003505476,0.00007989905,0.00027550862,0.019631224,0.96234494,0.015069856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001418882,0.0000054885463,0.0044949437,0.00008111929,0.000011100785,0.00006535054,0.0006542746,0.00022781645,0.00021298247,0.00071460614,0.9934946,0.000023623545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9735295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.987683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15009992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038243655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13351792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50213426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2504914278","doi":"10.29173/alr360","title":"The Further Adventures and Strange Afterlife of the Oil and Gas Lease","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Afterlife; Lease; Adventure; Economics; Business; Law and economics; Philosophy; History; Finance; Art history; Theology","score_opus":0.02405054878716231,"score_gpt":0.29294165083335244,"score_spread":0.26889110204619016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2504914278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020294162,0.0061224,0.0008034035,0.4422753,0.0032536106,0.00003039407,0.00020749691,0.000057650977,0.5269556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32702342,0.0022684694,0.0005010168,0.2824281,0.0017343493,0.00004362965,0.00008657368,0.000063584135,0.38585085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99656016,0.0007198905,0.00008589171,0.00049286225,0.0011142952,0.0010268288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970636,0.00143761,0.00020003294,0.00020460441,0.0006505031,0.0004436655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028916083,0.00024670872,0.00030851568,0.00051879155,0.016772684,0.0083576515,0.0015517237,0.02158211,0.008935151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008032553,0.00041844868,0.00059317733,0.00075106655,0.011569639,0.004484862,0.0024538774,0.017532803,0.0015910706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002652427,0.000011279449,0.0011256807,0.000030306346,0.0000069079356,0.0017323425,0.008097442,0.00007657695,0.00025794984,0.622583,0.3608237,0.0052282987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008878175,0.000010438126,0.0020703948,0.000119485376,0.000008359338,0.00048008378,0.0081217475,0.000088087705,0.0002669487,0.017260756,0.97151875,0.000046121368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2954071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59753174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70459294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00901814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011250505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5873753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2505598889","doi":"10.29173/alr352","title":"Navigating the Quagmire of Oil and Gas Transactions with Income Trusts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Oil Sands Technology and Research Authority","funders":"","keywords":"Database transaction; Transaction cost; Business; Fossil fuel; Asset (computer security); Focus (optics); Energy law; Petroleum industry; Economics; Public economics; Law; Finance; Political science; Environmental law","score_opus":0.026666769372819962,"score_gpt":0.3232781554594928,"score_spread":0.2966113860866728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2505598889","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10884543,0.12978888,0.01542183,0.21680693,0.0008246472,0.000112220645,0.00009448475,0.00005321447,0.52805245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9256475,0.039365876,0.0022696028,0.01321645,0.0005326204,0.00004266837,0.00003444572,0.000019321596,0.01887155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.989921,0.005027832,0.00032708395,0.00064938946,0.002684065,0.00139061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869731,0.008052343,0.0018635232,0.00056419254,0.002017286,0.0005294319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011930706,0.00014443329,0.00037632315,0.0018088244,0.005522808,0.0116290245,0.0015264105,0.005757808,0.004149915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021353317,0.00031436243,0.00028126125,0.0020750437,0.01654211,0.009121145,0.0039101257,0.005432645,0.00042968272],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003425305,0.0000057027555,0.00035637413,0.00004938118,0.0000032947246,0.000115015224,0.0009526331,0.00019386299,0.000036820195,0.9862482,0.002907095,0.009128135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023837052,0.000042752752,0.004055154,0.0010824758,0.000027726564,0.0003232539,0.007687643,0.0009093909,0.00026764363,0.62365276,0.36189103,0.000036354515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08138121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1242106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9186188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012614801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026982298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16181505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508827122","doi":"10.29173/alr253","title":"Assessment and Analysis of the Decision of the Alberta Court of Appeal in &lt;i&gt;OMERS Energy v. Alberta (Energy Resources Conservation Board)&lt;/i&gt;","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Upstream (networking); Energy law; Energy (signal processing); Law; Political science; Energy conservation; Energy resources; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Environmental economics; Environmental law; Engineering; Physics","score_opus":0.014386768502257313,"score_gpt":0.28742922953165007,"score_spread":0.2730424610293928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508827122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3410683,0.01244544,0.00481547,0.06291793,0.0007619707,0.0009070096,0.002594639,0.00006929295,0.57442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.943658,0.0046238885,0.0033794735,0.0068309633,0.00024212185,0.00014607534,0.00095324335,0.000026826696,0.040139418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9539156,0.005287689,0.00085171283,0.0014699937,0.031815063,0.006660019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9518413,0.019922547,0.0025827216,0.0008629371,0.023376333,0.0014141502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02739727,0.0004991595,0.0007102753,0.013645535,0.012615679,0.014385568,0.0042715487,0.0047914456,0.0052977726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054025702,0.0006902681,0.0009470901,0.010775572,0.00807381,0.00229495,0.0024936548,0.0049958853,0.0004646786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016776228,0.00016124573,0.033369496,0.00041304543,0.00018372705,0.001492656,0.013672414,0.0069912793,0.0009743587,0.81344885,0.069020525,0.060104746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001799253,0.00030534877,0.256,0.002348065,0.0011041344,0.0004619941,0.086758606,0.019856231,0.004192974,0.19794153,0.43011448,0.0007367237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9413405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97550565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12323679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12323679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20283352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89414966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509552618","doi":"10.29173/alr240","title":"Maternal Substance Abuse and the Limits of Law: A Relational Challenge","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Tort; Intervention (counseling); Substance use; Liability; Criminology; Psychology; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.057549962499129186,"score_gpt":0.30239467018303545,"score_spread":0.24484470768390626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509552618","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.082414635,0.034856368,0.021308322,0.6153997,0.0007831416,0.00007926213,0.000027913695,0.000045377587,0.24508524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9675313,0.008319128,0.0035389215,0.015180955,0.0007082036,0.00006231,0.000007514368,0.000016310341,0.0046353815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846095,0.009174147,0.0004008922,0.0011454552,0.003393952,0.0012760257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761644,0.019182205,0.001543665,0.0010426801,0.0010785905,0.0009884799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02058721,0.00021845609,0.00070181245,0.0013769462,0.0071394118,0.012976847,0.0028291445,0.009497364,0.0036160874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026520645,0.0004211423,0.00054530863,0.0010308085,0.061246395,0.012115945,0.009744994,0.010816162,0.0002278642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021976932,0.00001140238,0.00035144974,0.000021530155,0.000003933791,0.00016816412,0.006163075,0.000104764775,0.00009139167,0.98742515,0.0004956004,0.005161227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014030655,0.00003439831,0.0015214077,0.0003740236,0.00001266456,0.00048345968,0.02080474,0.00038648126,0.00015968646,0.9196315,0.05655479,0.000022745176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017811762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02694276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9821882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009595122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019548682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.108876824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2511357307","doi":"10.29173/alr236","title":"Recent Judicial Developments of Interest to Oil and Gas Lawyers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freehold; Law; Business; Confidentiality; Fossil fuel; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.05593790568919646,"score_gpt":0.3355935593943845,"score_spread":0.2796556537051881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2511357307","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01757849,0.7496545,0.0007079052,0.07562668,0.0020139138,0.00007154541,0.0003847339,0.0000620981,0.15390018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1650433,0.7764953,0.0015115421,0.024313351,0.0031704442,0.000030138219,0.0004559939,0.00003912861,0.028940849],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98982996,0.0009731587,0.00045230752,0.0007590414,0.0063354904,0.0016500129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9743703,0.006688655,0.0021125686,0.00031107105,0.015031673,0.0014856386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008711549,0.0003812881,0.0004927109,0.010250406,0.0067940685,0.009418086,0.00233191,0.0041290144,0.0067949183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019730708,0.0007235363,0.0004896363,0.017786587,0.0059324387,0.0018986108,0.001162747,0.003594494,0.00069039146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009574799,0.000113802824,0.0062330947,0.0033242092,0.00009159124,0.0015677129,0.0068487413,0.0019391393,0.0008783201,0.19074492,0.35447684,0.43368584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017587145,0.000021415815,0.013901509,0.00094100315,0.000047410584,0.00037750741,0.0019281819,0.00017817917,0.00019905968,0.002783621,0.9795488,0.000055828274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9347473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97577626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08237968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08237968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10930171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5977092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512581135","doi":"10.29173/alr255","title":"Regulatory and Liability Issues in Horizontal Multi-Stage Fracturing","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Imperial Oil (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Context (archaeology); Energy law; Liability; Unconventional oil; Fossil fuel; Subject (documents); Process (computing); Political science; Business; Economics; Law and economics; Law; Environmental law; Engineering; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.04528024000301092,"score_gpt":0.3651734046056263,"score_spread":0.3198931646026154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512581135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18449318,0.043418154,0.022051798,0.16008641,0.0009551611,0.00025831923,0.0001774185,0.0001586727,0.58840084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95229924,0.0054445155,0.0035527206,0.013856207,0.00070065714,0.000063944215,0.000034472425,0.000020081141,0.024028197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844214,0.003953249,0.0007356283,0.001301532,0.0069134487,0.002674703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747756,0.018230438,0.002014699,0.0009739846,0.0034838675,0.00052138645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01611254,0.000257257,0.00044081063,0.0021911873,0.006611552,0.008508245,0.0026520214,0.012735167,0.003717789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02222481,0.00052424445,0.0007072571,0.0016964233,0.016207205,0.0029288812,0.0034667857,0.0061682174,0.0003526053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006215456,0.000015334947,0.0009033729,0.000052462095,0.000007165314,0.0004967545,0.0010654876,0.00108735,0.0002346211,0.98020625,0.0051777964,0.010747158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073018826,0.00015634304,0.01154341,0.0013178587,0.00008763236,0.0015424105,0.006657148,0.00599341,0.0019008546,0.7225326,0.24806152,0.00013396995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08834413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10857041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08834413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012698778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021592746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17565984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515759044","doi":"10.29173/alr361","title":"\"Practical Necessity\" or \"Highly Sophisticated Opportunism\"? Judicial Review and Rate Regulation After ATCO Gas and Pipelines Ltd. v. Alberta (Energyand Utilties Board)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Opportunism; Pipeline transport; Business; Engineering; Law; Political science; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.06880607552981717,"score_gpt":0.3501502890439015,"score_spread":0.28134421351408434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2515759044","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02670087,0.010262202,0.004357276,0.6397615,0.0017757994,0.00014798294,0.00047748163,0.00012636423,0.31639054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6229942,0.003098339,0.0027377135,0.25756586,0.0022817305,0.00010276638,0.00015201623,0.0000616049,0.11100587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9751839,0.005887303,0.0008439089,0.002777342,0.008830138,0.0064773923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9720873,0.018500207,0.0014567082,0.0014498173,0.0055000684,0.0010058703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021399792,0.000417499,0.00057723146,0.0010972839,0.009746499,0.011598832,0.0040228334,0.029254733,0.0052396096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04476506,0.00074070215,0.0007508848,0.0014022767,0.017510336,0.0044538947,0.0019435274,0.011666732,0.00093238853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031458985,0.000017454477,0.0008880027,0.000051412495,0.0000139593485,0.00025686866,0.00198787,0.00025942578,0.0003471716,0.8148131,0.17550465,0.005828692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021942514,0.00008282294,0.0148691265,0.0006676233,0.00013243263,0.00032542946,0.0069122803,0.0022745302,0.0022711456,0.32684708,0.6450455,0.00035256494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4993637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7226571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50063634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022147177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04477859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99291414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W251828165","doi":"","title":"Refining the Test for Discrimination in the Context of Special Education: Moore v British Columbia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Special education; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Test (biology); Christian ministry; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.012364503626463534,"score_gpt":0.2736648334698175,"score_spread":0.261300329843354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W251828165","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49577224,0.0019819664,0.009200872,0.08130221,0.0006339136,0.0005122939,0.0009116667,0.00008652862,0.40959832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96490896,0.00032851682,0.004119768,0.020737145,0.00007844488,0.00018167909,0.00012591049,0.000019130637,0.009500385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98333824,0.004459268,0.0005951474,0.0019767974,0.006584239,0.0030463932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98251814,0.011112978,0.0007803294,0.0012705242,0.0032363688,0.0010817386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015348542,0.00042246337,0.00093037507,0.0025214518,0.012198723,0.006944677,0.00410213,0.0076678335,0.004023082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05072837,0.00046303638,0.00061130914,0.003575993,0.012691199,0.005326303,0.0049454835,0.009584172,0.0003347841],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020788221,0.00009908151,0.023982268,0.00011300839,0.000051875624,0.0013368684,0.0141036855,0.0006365252,0.00087914057,0.904477,0.0283972,0.025715463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087338063,0.00050329947,0.111681916,0.0021594793,0.00063998334,0.0014874293,0.059400365,0.012979801,0.0053226263,0.54303455,0.2613277,0.0005895314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7714152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82913274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22858483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0209317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04150703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.459862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521244895","doi":"","title":"The Law, Psychiatry and Pathologization of Sex Reassignment Surgery for Transgender Ontarians","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transgender; Mental health; Legislation; Political science; Gender dysphoria; Human rights; Sex reassignment surgery (male-to-female); Health care; Law; Medicine; Sociology; Gender studies; Psychiatry; Transsexual","score_opus":0.014692220745295461,"score_gpt":0.26512151889228297,"score_spread":0.2504292981469875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521244895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30562097,0.0074694403,0.0027731368,0.18484785,0.0012659578,0.00017866193,0.00017668573,0.000060055736,0.49760717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9033265,0.0028834813,0.0013447392,0.033348035,0.00027059182,0.00007662104,0.000047743895,0.000020945949,0.058681317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966108,0.000731768,0.00017209382,0.00024710002,0.0012771199,0.0009610318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99621445,0.0015087363,0.00045846312,0.00024309626,0.0008932435,0.0006819924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023697366,0.00011120956,0.000107992906,0.00054388115,0.013354747,0.0034187634,0.0008632635,0.0032700512,0.0024899866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005471804,0.00024423233,0.00016765625,0.00049994735,0.020640237,0.00085791666,0.0033339427,0.0027428365,0.0002762153],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004974978,0.00006708498,0.029708462,0.00014798206,0.000010006537,0.0068620136,0.19198419,0.00029655563,0.003863809,0.62555194,0.08111188,0.06034627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017059056,0.000056681543,0.054768205,0.00065427483,0.000018155875,0.0030795834,0.12204395,0.0002936031,0.0012794323,0.021835405,0.7958862,0.00006747567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6831697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8643271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31683028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024353903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.069153555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6373923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527691255","doi":"10.29173/alr433","title":"Toward Tort Liability for Bad Samaritans","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Liability; Strict liability; Delict; Declaration; Political science; Punishment (psychology); Common law; Joint and several liability; Private law; Public law; Psychology; Black letter law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04618932793106224,"score_gpt":0.3396519297527077,"score_spread":0.29346260182164546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527691255","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046130296,0.15461928,0.016169373,0.45914724,0.002390255,0.00009711667,0.00010713451,0.00007735871,0.321262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7173583,0.10485848,0.0088198,0.11369426,0.003279127,0.00006820409,0.0001243297,0.000037018035,0.051760577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99026626,0.0034506589,0.00043073838,0.0010944915,0.0039219027,0.00083585305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986272,0.00621163,0.0018705293,0.0007403468,0.0039847996,0.0009206729],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014129811,0.00037308809,0.00041960314,0.00504455,0.0053831427,0.0060811727,0.0016953939,0.009771393,0.003734783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021383392,0.00041661048,0.000603142,0.0016967059,0.015392583,0.0047445917,0.0044380887,0.012189389,0.0009344612],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034418026,0.000017010128,0.0010005719,0.00010419371,0.000009128819,0.0001462557,0.0010307404,0.0003299066,0.00013801751,0.9720383,0.013789248,0.011393137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000159122,0.00004010916,0.004844769,0.0020564639,0.00003764839,0.0005844562,0.0022680757,0.00067559356,0.00049290457,0.6190796,0.36986464,0.00003989499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03849915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.067486845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03849915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007623439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016692465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076550126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528344651","doi":"","title":"Employee Drug Testing: Orwellian Vision or Pragmatic Approach to Problems in the Workforce","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Human rights; Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Legislation; Political science; Civil liberties; Charter; Legitimacy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.0695673268313307,"score_gpt":0.3514494775894099,"score_spread":0.2818821507580792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528344651","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026979428,0.010365026,0.0077723023,0.8916558,0.0016342578,0.00006172208,0.000028591692,0.00003423616,0.085750096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35954124,0.0116852475,0.014919172,0.5448855,0.0057826587,0.00045060096,0.000035695495,0.00009240165,0.06260751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854482,0.0075248717,0.00046443488,0.0016618607,0.0029322552,0.0019684127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99193656,0.0046714987,0.0004671283,0.0004112605,0.0011363006,0.0013773794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016560188,0.00086364197,0.000872378,0.0025541212,0.013180247,0.012892389,0.003591742,0.027355859,0.004556412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013989998,0.00044211012,0.0007398799,0.001494947,0.08778514,0.013091002,0.008858832,0.01804387,0.0005665419],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004891971,0.000028430026,0.00015718403,0.00004655812,0.0000022601885,0.00010281822,0.00273658,0.000078339195,0.000050541545,0.9713019,0.020399556,0.0050908667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032805958,0.000043002787,0.00035557238,0.0004689779,0.0000074391232,0.00020163333,0.00711134,0.00046399535,0.000085145024,0.7593576,0.23184112,0.000031460248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.088305466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09888845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088305466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027828347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046003044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20190978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528473891","doi":"10.3138/9781442687592-010","title":"Appendix: The Progression of Canadian Drug Law – Key Events","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); Drug; Law; Political science; Computer science; Medicine; Computer security; Pharmacology","score_opus":0.02328979632383903,"score_gpt":0.23223993962474326,"score_spread":0.20895014330090422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528473891","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008366442,0.0015225051,0.0005766036,0.007387388,0.0036821899,0.0005328736,0.033579405,0.00042048737,0.951462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0077327825,0.0013258774,0.0008930549,0.0016071745,0.00040368698,0.00013094879,0.0074474737,0.00014653921,0.9803124],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911565,0.00004853245,0.000025979853,0.00007459566,0.00055032456,0.00018482668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997033,0.0003188269,0.000056724057,0.00010101612,0.002103718,0.00038667937],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000647994,0.00070991763,0.000469152,0.00394396,0.0063289274,0.0037646536,0.0013583384,0.0022694934,0.47792834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004712864,0.0004403791,0.00044145656,0.006247496,0.0008649201,0.001351117,0.0010008127,0.0023143443,0.07447154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034647205,0.000004780042,0.00003887772,0.000023780507,2.2962654e-7,0.000014762385,0.000045587498,0.000029265786,0.000012726202,0.005211467,0.98937035,0.0052446155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034496088,0.000002058012,0.0011664107,0.00005152557,9.522255e-7,0.000015458276,0.00013806314,0.000029764029,0.000033864784,0.0010053363,0.9975472,0.0000057725415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89589876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95117074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47792834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036436066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04288614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7446718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529612912","doi":"","title":"When All Else Fails, Blame the Parents: An Analysis of Parental Responsibility Laws in Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Juvenile delinquency; Economic Justice; Law; Criminology; Poverty; Moral responsibility; Political science; Legal responsibility; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.043616866470318885,"score_gpt":0.3376268931768372,"score_spread":0.2940100267065183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529612912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93284804,0.0026142013,0.00027511537,0.0060697575,0.000045805442,0.00020952639,0.0011628405,0.000019065179,0.056755643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907782,0.0020802654,0.00021773358,0.0007829605,0.000009167442,0.00002894757,0.0004710506,0.00001474456,0.0056168186],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99268156,0.0004117934,0.0001924442,0.00029077055,0.0031865782,0.0032368908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98475665,0.002751893,0.0021402463,0.00033952057,0.0072658663,0.0027457403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021317312,0.00031450333,0.0004830716,0.0048214598,0.01798462,0.004722857,0.002360175,0.0015500048,0.0040327115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0156132355,0.00044804366,0.00070649746,0.009605699,0.0034862857,0.000916635,0.0020214375,0.0024728007,0.00020170205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021215214,0.0004307377,0.68880457,0.00026669313,0.00015879433,0.0037323113,0.12871644,0.0026806027,0.0005152277,0.08375745,0.030378371,0.060346715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033443972,0.000050205632,0.8108064,0.00040570748,0.00012177006,0.00038184054,0.13251413,0.0022995004,0.00028218608,0.0016698777,0.051333927,0.0001010064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9981165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99897397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15124692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15124692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20961106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9844333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529726430","doi":"10.3138/9781442671669-003","title":"Mack v. Attorney General of Canada: Equality, History, and Reparation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03772428112565787,"score_gpt":0.2365762163895333,"score_spread":0.19885193526387543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529726430","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017439557,0.086177796,0.00091302395,0.20276982,0.0018552551,0.00012911404,0.0017699779,0.00012036382,0.6888251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22223027,0.020971693,0.000880523,0.06051556,0.00047024235,0.00009151289,0.00031515333,0.00009404139,0.694431],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964562,0.00025024253,0.000072312876,0.0001908999,0.0015325202,0.0014978376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984446,0.000361733,0.000084347135,0.000044744418,0.00078456855,0.00027996086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015870142,0.00055544975,0.00038952308,0.0014297351,0.019006912,0.0065072835,0.0022327218,0.01000202,0.014500533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053230147,0.00069024996,0.00039723545,0.0027929246,0.0053498363,0.0025704745,0.0016043541,0.0068441597,0.0013412213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028569575,0.000014905915,0.0013292753,0.000076513046,0.0000069048892,0.00023064982,0.0040683,0.00016316026,0.000148895,0.24554911,0.73121667,0.017167015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001805906,0.000011449495,0.009067508,0.00041787856,0.000032348496,0.00012243641,0.0055214027,0.00020458027,0.00048996374,0.017254012,0.9667837,0.000076723445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9876864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07212175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07212175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16080679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52328235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529794700","doi":"","title":"A Practical Guide to Appellate Judging","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Trial court; Political science; Supreme court; Law of the case; Economic Justice; Court of record; Remand (court procedure); Sociology; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.05537421702774193,"score_gpt":0.4255470423250415,"score_spread":0.37017282529729956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529794700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012758423,0.014875956,0.071306065,0.056745224,0.012991823,0.0023462193,0.0044026156,0.0064352104,0.82962096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0091727525,0.008512328,0.07949288,0.02660892,0.0026799897,0.0015596555,0.0032465535,0.0021928141,0.8665341],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99281436,0.00268184,0.0006707887,0.00069253636,0.002501291,0.0006391826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98892003,0.0034284568,0.00033034646,0.0008217521,0.0055333916,0.0009659604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050659124,0.001362147,0.0012121727,0.0033215499,0.005649765,0.0059751193,0.0033477177,0.0059116073,0.20087682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021174317,0.0011457419,0.00080608285,0.0035514054,0.0027324166,0.0051170685,0.0041491548,0.0068717916,0.19009066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009978731,0.000037596863,0.00011533167,0.00011192571,9.225239e-7,0.00012713118,0.00056892895,0.000085596046,0.0001827835,0.010158092,0.9146025,0.073999204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028609406,0.000008778925,0.0001233982,0.00013964446,4.8001175e-7,0.00011261376,0.0003589437,0.00009466115,0.00004393965,0.0036432566,0.99546367,0.000007728608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013871722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035773993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20087682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032699488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008746595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67199993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530012025","doi":"10.34961/8424","title":"The devil in the detail: property division under British Columbia' s Family Law Act 2011","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Property (philosophy); Law; Political science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.016084813069506838,"score_gpt":0.19946759908236483,"score_spread":0.18338278601285798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530012025","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2389573,0.0073590796,0.0016061786,0.08915261,0.0008894191,0.00051641953,0.0025970547,0.00013770944,0.6587842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7442108,0.0030313001,0.0017716297,0.02672602,0.000090706526,0.00016460943,0.00068902643,0.000050728206,0.22326525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904074,0.0011244612,0.0004198664,0.00076940283,0.0046585095,0.0026203417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99089557,0.00263431,0.0004640326,0.00038237651,0.004243435,0.0013802841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049738116,0.00023380943,0.0003743482,0.0019730416,0.01888603,0.007929779,0.0022079572,0.004957169,0.0048608324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01759143,0.00050832925,0.00022508067,0.002849576,0.0055316854,0.0010275567,0.002291955,0.0051920568,0.00073291606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088232104,0.00012920133,0.04297024,0.00033391113,0.00003372341,0.0030610217,0.05796219,0.0012689373,0.002170135,0.44226238,0.3815163,0.06820369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041925705,0.000054414453,0.12846704,0.0008505475,0.000046051297,0.00048701852,0.036410075,0.001041292,0.001324298,0.008681282,0.8223669,0.00022926892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9899121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10785278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10785278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18448688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78253037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2535315963","doi":"10.5703/1288284316229","title":"The Long Arm of the Law: Privacy Explored","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Purdue Pharma (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Law; Internet privacy; Computer security; Political science","score_opus":0.02994724360585235,"score_gpt":0.29074652168074006,"score_spread":0.26079927807488773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2535315963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071553014,0.02481108,0.079612084,0.31389508,0.00087759277,0.00009301757,0.00030103305,0.00009324565,0.50876385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96374434,0.004147153,0.0042596115,0.009855271,0.00091685046,0.00006537476,0.00005071025,0.000059142512,0.01690162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99168724,0.0048877737,0.00022701977,0.00089986937,0.0013388095,0.0009593285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97912395,0.015600759,0.0010888713,0.0019115024,0.0014925876,0.00078232965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009087519,0.00043550873,0.0007798501,0.0019564303,0.0081417225,0.018897727,0.0017949477,0.009240736,0.013174411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024662659,0.00043010383,0.0007474419,0.0030073137,0.05241654,0.027433949,0.0060062967,0.0095164785,0.00085315463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000466696,0.0000044038816,0.00015864789,0.00001060826,0.0000022146853,0.000012062465,0.0012215461,0.00005589193,0.000031489504,0.9958287,0.0006926142,0.0019770777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050499166,0.000006857741,0.00033711665,0.0000811535,0.000004414864,0.000024447074,0.0014753101,0.00028421008,0.00006896814,0.9826781,0.015027569,0.0000066846246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008868283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007752723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018897727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064843637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010115146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04805994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2535591805","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316585481.015","title":"McBoyle v. United States","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.015543595569036405,"score_gpt":0.3157554521773973,"score_spread":0.3002118566083609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2535591805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063508176,0.003724131,0.00036441948,0.019570526,0.000613282,0.0000802517,0.0011015162,0.00011738027,0.96807766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12832488,0.0033302305,0.000606088,0.061933897,0.0008346389,0.0003734032,0.0006467556,0.00011629512,0.8038339],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979746,0.00039850583,0.000082294304,0.00023246545,0.00074470503,0.00056738954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997761,0.001019977,0.00016995288,0.00017459688,0.0006027741,0.00027158757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018433777,0.0006866332,0.0005311073,0.0017916714,0.0071998253,0.004549343,0.0013275904,0.0083732605,0.04546679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067850975,0.0005075596,0.00064345467,0.0019401293,0.0018127995,0.0020991366,0.002335725,0.006116786,0.008894331],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091358175,0.000102208345,0.0016430372,0.000108134365,0.000016191801,0.00024292314,0.00087094854,0.00018216559,0.00041596126,0.33621976,0.6317109,0.028396355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067534,0.000033981647,0.0055857794,0.00048725813,0.000040136627,0.00012338476,0.00053481775,0.00040578132,0.00062277005,0.025603103,0.9664561,0.00003938573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1325729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2898954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1325729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043164953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01183905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26360244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2537570604","doi":"10.29173/alr456","title":"Englander v. Telus: Protection of Privacy in the Private Sector Goes to the Federal Court of Appeal","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Personally identifiable information; Parliament; Subject (documents); The Internet; Internet privacy; Supreme court; Business; Private sector; Private information retrieval; Law; Political science; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.033039218718509344,"score_gpt":0.3018146509869245,"score_spread":0.26877543226841516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2537570604","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024027841,0.03391204,0.0014300798,0.44698524,0.0048771976,0.00018665084,0.0009370409,0.00024208725,0.48740178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27813148,0.009632577,0.0010654976,0.4117813,0.002447404,0.0001904424,0.00032279632,0.000089825226,0.2963386],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875279,0.0019333019,0.0005793532,0.0013681494,0.005065568,0.0035257791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98485523,0.009343426,0.0005314042,0.0006171114,0.0037123035,0.00094047654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007952362,0.00041991682,0.00084783434,0.001572692,0.011210226,0.0073958524,0.0025644545,0.023566684,0.009942101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030455498,0.0008235188,0.00083660317,0.001504609,0.005417044,0.00408688,0.0017108276,0.011150184,0.0025938363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000803529,0.000030506111,0.0015608779,0.00019312622,0.000029649424,0.0008599263,0.0023534764,0.00010752949,0.00057713344,0.45908687,0.516326,0.018794635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013988957,0.000067483474,0.010070572,0.0011476444,0.00018242118,0.0006399691,0.0022392538,0.00041161463,0.0012505746,0.053208303,0.93049544,0.0001469339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5290373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6820567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5290373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01774096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04347584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9474726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2538980895","doi":"","title":"The Cost Recovery Act and Tobacco Litigation in Canada: A Model for Fast Food Litigation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Tobacco industry; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.01760770313621708,"score_gpt":0.25644350460337956,"score_spread":0.2388358014671625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2538980895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16001657,0.0030868133,0.009742564,0.13065407,0.00051371683,0.00080914394,0.0016972803,0.00019076659,0.69328904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8975685,0.0019345838,0.0034461461,0.009470015,0.00018454478,0.00021119034,0.00022293003,0.000054875305,0.086907126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936913,0.0009970824,0.00010605493,0.00052911893,0.0015364039,0.0031401129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99406093,0.0022482097,0.00040940222,0.00023962311,0.001676168,0.001365616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031122037,0.0010571354,0.0009396421,0.0036284474,0.01915436,0.01984079,0.004330593,0.01678852,0.017626332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01332856,0.0009225858,0.0017870475,0.0038418865,0.013251067,0.006486948,0.0035194827,0.009268731,0.0010417358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037017715,0.00010212772,0.0020361363,0.000022307395,0.000018657483,0.00024987824,0.0013837853,0.0036821177,0.00008436155,0.9739328,0.015303738,0.0031470773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008686473,0.0002418346,0.018339211,0.0005641676,0.00053661177,0.00049758854,0.024959859,0.08046367,0.00060237676,0.7027535,0.16959196,0.00058059377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9896965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9912846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12632178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12632178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27478555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91653293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2546431366","doi":"10.29173/alr465","title":"Inadequate Reasons: The Need for Tribunal Participation in Judicial Review Litigation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03927509320099208,"score_gpt":0.3639145121851825,"score_spread":0.3246394189841904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2546431366","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07026196,0.0051473514,0.0037607416,0.83461577,0.0014528488,0.00023498628,0.00013625616,0.00007992277,0.0843102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82243615,0.0015427861,0.0039598136,0.15240087,0.0012736577,0.00038589042,0.000087114604,0.00007420523,0.01783953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.87210137,0.070409894,0.007124739,0.00526218,0.031765964,0.013335821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5432159,0.31920403,0.029362286,0.019724716,0.05362652,0.03486654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.102853805,0.00017918389,0.0007459842,0.0017619277,0.009099442,0.013937678,0.0045065014,0.016029598,0.009871957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37084612,0.00065379683,0.0005440014,0.0018952407,0.008332077,0.0072159753,0.0046811025,0.013518273,0.0011922619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046392967,0.00032887267,0.07904701,0.0010026627,0.000113805414,0.0018273607,0.04161724,0.00086387125,0.0010830517,0.39019424,0.3008463,0.18261163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036382186,0.00027698363,0.1211458,0.0042983647,0.00023307237,0.0016176732,0.058134414,0.004186466,0.0015684022,0.2758433,0.53201205,0.00031972298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047842227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23757038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102853805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009961913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.073857956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5439494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2547332279","doi":"10.29173/alr775","title":"Next Up: A Proposal for Values-Based Law Reform on Unilateral Withholding and Withdrawal of Potentially Life-Sustaining Treatment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; State (computer science); Political science; Common law; Law reform; Public law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04003853548056559,"score_gpt":0.342337364744946,"score_spread":0.30229882926438045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2547332279","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008360577,0.003924698,0.028025217,0.7733517,0.007766887,0.00090098195,0.00017212391,0.00028222761,0.17721559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3428177,0.004857974,0.08091094,0.47052562,0.0044778725,0.0015750685,0.00020191219,0.00014457451,0.094488434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97261775,0.0103630675,0.0012575232,0.0028173577,0.007115137,0.005829242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790749,0.008814442,0.0008731434,0.001689002,0.0058439057,0.003704585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031417295,0.00067290216,0.0009154799,0.002865436,0.010046458,0.013353798,0.006064269,0.03164487,0.006593275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04885998,0.00066837075,0.0022141237,0.001835942,0.021953732,0.013369639,0.0068362597,0.019355487,0.0009643812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014258614,0.000044199718,0.00019495936,0.00008668993,0.000010118078,0.000112260976,0.00100619,0.0003022906,0.00011590055,0.9660297,0.023318822,0.008764453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016992408,0.00010769516,0.0013914193,0.0008035407,0.00009679821,0.00017525586,0.002599236,0.001508677,0.00065912295,0.5734488,0.4189016,0.00013801864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1853886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32465875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9697853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030214714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15223843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36861902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2548370312","doi":"10.29173/alr463","title":"Regulating Hydraulic Fracturing: Regulatory Recourse for Subsurface Communication","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hydraulic fracturing; Harm; Jurisdiction; Production (economics); Order (exchange); Liability; Business; Compensation (psychology); Law; Petroleum engineering; Geology; Economics; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.03130227233156364,"score_gpt":0.3279236359648988,"score_spread":0.2966213636333352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2548370312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040684823,0.03506599,0.02618255,0.110428035,0.0013206403,0.00025552948,0.00038023922,0.00030884796,0.7853734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80049646,0.015611166,0.015944796,0.047858182,0.00084050774,0.00014824797,0.00028553302,0.00008089473,0.11873422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821181,0.0016118595,0.0004745443,0.0010903226,0.012547263,0.0021578877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884467,0.004790649,0.0009103899,0.00080837,0.00460921,0.00043463992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009891345,0.0004723244,0.00045937378,0.00232926,0.00659883,0.008455296,0.0040630135,0.008315626,0.0033259096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010859338,0.00053724594,0.000642601,0.0017337054,0.015959317,0.002162435,0.0030706367,0.0065220883,0.00038455942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013313529,0.0000218206,0.0011699141,0.00015461832,0.000010219446,0.00029994303,0.0017121423,0.0014188379,0.0011390012,0.9482056,0.016745266,0.029109284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068864974,0.00008254794,0.009265068,0.0018327364,0.00008144863,0.00052895234,0.0029606908,0.002205072,0.002147215,0.17097539,0.80967087,0.0001811097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7545704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8146499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24542958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03031017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10002811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49374992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560639850","doi":"","title":"U.S. Drug Court: A Building Block For Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Block (permutation group theory); Mathematics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.025403605069868575,"score_gpt":0.23117829764253867,"score_spread":0.2057746925726701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560639850","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063220166,0.015578382,0.007544677,0.5760252,0.004856827,0.0019333619,0.011251089,0.0014510396,0.31813926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46119633,0.019471148,0.056324843,0.11614801,0.0012921203,0.00069144083,0.006931558,0.0005655641,0.33737892],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99536246,0.0002919696,0.00011447092,0.00036643934,0.0022064478,0.001658276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98158157,0.0007990401,0.00032699414,0.00036990392,0.009220817,0.007701708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035200298,0.00055250555,0.00054335414,0.0026359917,0.015710484,0.0072904476,0.0029181018,0.0048519094,0.025461668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00863872,0.00069666805,0.00076688995,0.00180716,0.0028529246,0.0029226118,0.002828679,0.0051513375,0.003112893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001926569,0.00027633278,0.019018436,0.00025246385,0.00005860404,0.0005721938,0.0006852934,0.0017200154,0.0014714057,0.14284676,0.6874533,0.14545251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002518617,0.00016983584,0.055236727,0.0007027938,0.00011104633,0.0002626313,0.002169184,0.0063941553,0.0010321493,0.015932767,0.9175511,0.00018564828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99286735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10619588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10619588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.48238847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77050865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564813398","doi":"10.3138/cbmh.20.1.208","title":"From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice Allen Buchanan, Dan W. Brock, Norman Daniels, and Daniel Wikler","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Health History","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Criminology; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04254316171467316,"score_gpt":0.29606575603534246,"score_spread":0.2535225943206693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564813398","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015299635,0.039209265,0.003400992,0.72255516,0.0018792276,0.000023700197,0.00015950917,0.000041102936,0.21743144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7553107,0.0509151,0.004088413,0.08605539,0.0016669481,0.000074564494,0.00010451086,0.00011705108,0.101667285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981318,0.0010778558,0.00004383128,0.00016965195,0.00036534693,0.0002116138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939015,0.004024308,0.000261397,0.0002670004,0.0005608395,0.0009849659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041395333,0.00022089851,0.0004979871,0.00076954515,0.0053314874,0.005192212,0.0005441362,0.0030487422,0.010034191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013469569,0.000210614,0.00012718339,0.0010057823,0.021835893,0.0047805347,0.0018425084,0.0031013046,0.00088684156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017104152,0.000020296657,0.0020157578,0.000037207363,0.0000072955863,0.0002557882,0.0076490026,0.000111704576,0.00007214501,0.846322,0.11706317,0.026428575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014637198,0.000010110359,0.0022784339,0.00032208933,0.0000067175674,0.0004188368,0.0071939435,0.00011897174,0.00009618026,0.82061505,0.1689017,0.000023377332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056629453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11786173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056629453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004998792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005915924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11259967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566677771","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2854522","title":"Integrating Climate Change into EA: Thoughts on Federal Law Reform","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Law reform; Environmental law; Political science; Federal law; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Legislation","score_opus":0.01929999479391651,"score_gpt":0.30068315380329763,"score_spread":0.2813831590093811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566677771","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030049363,0.009537856,0.010977099,0.70929,0.0032896798,0.000052313775,0.00016968812,0.00007421621,0.2365597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91082865,0.0037485603,0.0033260577,0.06709086,0.0034529832,0.00008800615,0.00004705251,0.00004980078,0.0113679655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996148,0.001514861,0.00010150978,0.00041446512,0.00048689256,0.0013342999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99689794,0.0017012106,0.00020747629,0.00028389765,0.00060144824,0.00030807513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065044053,0.0003347611,0.00059555203,0.001376121,0.0051107123,0.0107877785,0.0020563155,0.013765925,0.007038889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011989697,0.0002536328,0.00087116146,0.0015488068,0.017196942,0.014988388,0.0037896854,0.010724104,0.00045189308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013323845,0.00003398115,0.00026436156,0.000020895208,0.000008163506,0.000040924875,0.00073622394,0.00055433414,0.000065661996,0.98632973,0.006857789,0.00507458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011780088,0.00001317081,0.001149311,0.00011638013,0.000012477854,0.000018848006,0.0020666944,0.00072479504,0.00015510136,0.95069087,0.045020625,0.000019992392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025931671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031377327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025931671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008302168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009683588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060236692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567168204","doi":"","title":"Same-Sex Marriage and the Constitution : The Civil Marriage Act (Canada) Considered, Part 1","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hōgaku shinpō","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.010396073148679024,"score_gpt":0.2254141503759062,"score_spread":0.21501807722722718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2567168204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14367045,0.01765088,0.0017050933,0.06217179,0.0008635341,0.00038272454,0.0018345577,0.00005110089,0.7716698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8523023,0.0056996695,0.0011990393,0.011664514,0.00031429078,0.00015753717,0.00031444637,0.000033349173,0.12831497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99493366,0.0005075329,0.00011753552,0.0004252079,0.0014558065,0.0025602705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99753153,0.0006816314,0.00017209286,0.00014700858,0.0009607874,0.000506854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020841714,0.0004634764,0.00064576033,0.0015133275,0.020313594,0.008214676,0.0021601748,0.0106545165,0.008649401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075457375,0.0005977337,0.00062209915,0.003733327,0.0123038925,0.002011432,0.0022903036,0.0076291305,0.0005195051],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016965407,0.000033417906,0.0025381288,0.00003943755,0.000009213689,0.00017950793,0.0032364628,0.0003374252,0.00009777629,0.970379,0.017787566,0.0053450833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012135239,0.00009556366,0.06424947,0.00070805254,0.00016518614,0.00034122678,0.018850522,0.002598243,0.000864973,0.2923912,0.61937195,0.00024224723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9880613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06743343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06743343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1917687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4892661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2570829184","doi":"","title":"Halsbury's Laws of Canada in Context","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.009436389660185094,"score_gpt":0.1889700245784419,"score_spread":0.1795336349182568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2570829184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03252559,0.006307128,0.0019351611,0.09019274,0.00081646227,0.00015496109,0.0011926047,0.00012298279,0.8667524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46384308,0.0032485777,0.0028014695,0.03980954,0.00027895535,0.0001753813,0.0002806554,0.00016917901,0.48939317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863318,0.0013488842,0.00039484713,0.0014777532,0.0047976263,0.0056491503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913005,0.0022904363,0.00026892862,0.0004899373,0.0042457776,0.001404288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042450405,0.0006646015,0.0009605615,0.0027887379,0.034940828,0.025785051,0.0043230252,0.013592888,0.019277979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016783288,0.0011434191,0.0010214711,0.004819449,0.019213418,0.004461377,0.005624899,0.015665973,0.0011943642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010287524,0.00001043105,0.0003473563,0.000021902202,0.0000073809165,0.00008839561,0.0032841216,0.00017624589,0.0000545978,0.954209,0.03882668,0.0029635052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000447089,0.000013212535,0.0058707767,0.00034955304,0.000049538765,0.000095395444,0.010174451,0.00054997264,0.0003432859,0.12167808,0.86063856,0.0001924624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99622726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99769104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81296504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18703493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3246002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94292426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587304703","doi":"","title":"The Evolution of Consumer Privacy Law: How Privacy by Design Can Benefit from Insights in Commercial Law and Standardization","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Personally identifiable information; Privacy by Design; Business; Consumer protection; Temptation; Standardization; Transferability; Information privacy; Information privacy law; Limiting; Internet privacy; Privacy policy; FTC Fair Information Practice; Law and economics; Law; Computer science; Economics; Political science; Incentive; Microeconomics; Engineering","score_opus":0.019592488692547372,"score_gpt":0.2636593672511173,"score_spread":0.24406687855856996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587304703","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029407296,0.010284697,0.37424144,0.26346412,0.0010138943,0.00019892561,0.00008549445,0.0002519106,0.32105213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8484541,0.005673929,0.103150405,0.019286098,0.0009390871,0.00043881012,0.00007339124,0.00033231082,0.021651784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97032833,0.019893263,0.00084179087,0.0025271901,0.005141916,0.001267557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96371067,0.024421474,0.0013534337,0.006970458,0.0027990665,0.0007449286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0422323,0.00071454264,0.0009230619,0.0024465525,0.0058474704,0.015582821,0.0026368054,0.01005431,0.0035979506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035984654,0.000947313,0.0011548371,0.0018125837,0.07835108,0.02728188,0.006097071,0.014695477,0.00072422746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028955653,0.0000066738226,0.00008274356,0.000011392445,0.0000027269423,0.000018873376,0.0011987356,0.00020082493,0.00004320138,0.9951507,0.00048360325,0.0027976346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008614517,0.00001787126,0.00011203323,0.00006992798,0.0000048628926,0.000053667514,0.0005929515,0.0008327898,0.0001668606,0.9715636,0.026562763,0.000014190618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048568184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034454279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0422323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010041508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076089147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22334844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592300480","doi":"","title":"R. V. Safarzadeh-Markhali: Elements and Implications of the Supreme Court's New Rigorous Approach to Construction of Statutory Purpose","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Statutory law; Law; Statutory interpretation; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.019048617900382345,"score_gpt":0.26969926271533595,"score_spread":0.2506506448149536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592300480","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07600719,0.008182666,0.020820573,0.41726455,0.0020399692,0.00036783828,0.0004270268,0.00030813896,0.474582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81126016,0.003187671,0.01693943,0.1186297,0.0015977423,0.00029642443,0.00012524484,0.00012363079,0.047839977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9803052,0.003096397,0.00055250514,0.0018285617,0.0106364945,0.0035807919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907554,0.004817849,0.0004646059,0.0006523478,0.0025250253,0.00078473124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016681027,0.00071284367,0.0009778697,0.0019631921,0.013839165,0.0121666,0.0049804715,0.014605949,0.0012393715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017573977,0.0009190159,0.0010993802,0.0015995465,0.029655479,0.004457537,0.0038976115,0.024126733,0.00042501645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009072305,0.000008086268,0.00024296941,0.000009073811,0.0000063104644,0.00009388412,0.0011150057,0.00016217127,0.00014157663,0.98864067,0.0070035174,0.0025675367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022210708,0.000094610434,0.0054006414,0.00045253718,0.000115085066,0.00024250872,0.002189331,0.0056255446,0.0023338746,0.7966042,0.18640824,0.0003112428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6097464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.722976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6097464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042516816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08072503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7851038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593594836","doi":"","title":"ESTs under Canadian Patent Law: Useful or Not?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patent law; Law; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.03759961730365224,"score_gpt":0.2727977674909791,"score_spread":0.23519815018732687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593594836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024295758,0.006355226,0.01089,0.13312532,0.0006805815,0.00018999906,0.0005481283,0.00015381677,0.8237611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.741576,0.007972772,0.01108469,0.05912553,0.00090564345,0.00020093995,0.00041892586,0.00010271468,0.17861272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98060226,0.0021251892,0.0006529413,0.0015487666,0.011360055,0.003710787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876457,0.0052931774,0.0005548318,0.00087720534,0.005132156,0.00049701094],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013557876,0.0006039658,0.0005681818,0.0033102885,0.01415367,0.011814946,0.0029277047,0.009806608,0.007894819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032489687,0.00049987895,0.0008517457,0.0040193712,0.017943937,0.006833625,0.0028850536,0.0063362853,0.0009014463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003039085,0.0000034202606,0.00030229756,0.00002328087,0.0000024591575,0.00011485055,0.0008746203,0.00007934894,0.000097408374,0.9817837,0.008589149,0.008126498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003206996,0.00003122824,0.008008069,0.00043325181,0.000056085475,0.00047953584,0.003960456,0.0018258038,0.00093678024,0.47125357,0.51283795,0.0001452275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.837657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87041926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98584634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047455695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.073300645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34431678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595840443","doi":"","title":"The Law of Privacy in Canada (Student Edition). By Barbara A. McIsaac, Rick Shields, Kris Klein (Toronto: Thomson Carswell, 2004)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shields; Law; History; Art history; Political science; Engineering; Electrical engineering","score_opus":0.008122435637651802,"score_gpt":0.2591764783519739,"score_spread":0.2510540427143221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595840443","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017285154,0.6076344,0.001743328,0.08936058,0.008054623,0.000076508266,0.00303541,0.00022234947,0.28814432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059618868,0.30505782,0.0032195416,0.018693719,0.003254181,0.00010083198,0.0019319146,0.0002501816,0.607873],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846506,0.000100734826,0.000050648352,0.00010825073,0.0010116319,0.00026370576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984848,0.00015293584,0.00007610152,0.00006514412,0.00097170414,0.00024939736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000990851,0.001123245,0.0004633644,0.0026707214,0.006741687,0.0066109668,0.0017198346,0.003486496,0.0219477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029522325,0.00087302364,0.00048231753,0.0068436996,0.0058342884,0.003398017,0.0016802865,0.003272082,0.006463266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062641607,0.0000072967196,0.00032514718,0.000098992976,0.000004040252,0.00007352521,0.0011302141,0.0001472134,0.000040691823,0.030028548,0.93927985,0.028858235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029229943,0.0000028799918,0.0020538121,0.0002637079,0.000004150369,0.000083204424,0.00083837577,0.00006843204,0.000034538436,0.0057413764,0.9908949,0.000011739205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9661066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98640245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0670818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0670818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07815729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48671484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598412328","doi":"","title":"Dedication: The Honorable Jerome Turner","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œUniversity of Memphis law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Nothing; Reputation; Memphis; Uncanny; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.018583760170405837,"score_gpt":0.24998113565672303,"score_spread":0.2313973754863172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2598412328","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017538463,0.018578509,0.001928576,0.66115725,0.24816756,0.00019564047,0.0011996977,0.0010670479,0.06595189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01869328,0.012634416,0.0027716993,0.26941392,0.05705689,0.000407108,0.0010424895,0.001148814,0.6368314],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99575317,0.00078294554,0.00017059426,0.0008083198,0.001767145,0.00071792124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97677577,0.00147439,0.00077777036,0.0005783471,0.008185492,0.012208251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003921838,0.0014655279,0.0014687415,0.0015126459,0.005508318,0.007873134,0.0018898733,0.0031018192,0.102117375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02190135,0.0006485636,0.0006611415,0.0005981483,0.0017313666,0.0035031822,0.0058405697,0.010294032,0.07896379],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008801364,0.000010511216,0.00006771291,0.00002468366,0.0000013419589,0.00006486505,0.00013082674,0.000008381407,0.000046902685,0.0005923726,0.9929074,0.006136189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054283482,0.000014268238,0.00023355299,0.00015024895,0.0000020505026,0.0004964785,0.0007539542,0.000034146116,0.00005863695,0.0007883861,0.99744934,0.0000134852635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052774753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006694002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102117375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033141328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008478017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34161663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599661567","doi":"10.11575/prism/30032","title":"Lost in Translation: Examining Alberta's Duty to Consult Policy and the Challenge Government Faces when Policies are Imposed on them by the Judicial System","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Duty; Political science; Public policy; Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.07151754644638478,"score_gpt":0.3165587576489407,"score_spread":0.24504121120255593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599661567","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19800235,0.005347277,0.0022119472,0.18931304,0.0010478764,0.00009568793,0.0001246223,0.00005805145,0.60379916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9317511,0.0016177697,0.0012027466,0.019114094,0.00015597389,0.00003163388,0.000055290293,0.000041896972,0.04602964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.983677,0.004351237,0.000333386,0.00076498336,0.0054458273,0.0054274756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97517747,0.014175471,0.0010137847,0.0008762211,0.0067563313,0.002000727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015596659,0.00030233053,0.0004403789,0.0022871534,0.050519478,0.028095536,0.0040332787,0.008625895,0.0067431466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03489866,0.00044665096,0.000457037,0.00508096,0.040008277,0.0053016883,0.008239616,0.009871192,0.00047152955],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004542279,0.00003990841,0.0047144345,0.00010015737,0.000011713542,0.0018373984,0.19294038,0.00038958437,0.00030604837,0.7366467,0.037971646,0.024996685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003346781,0.000034657605,0.015489714,0.00083413225,0.000044590244,0.00046577238,0.47724396,0.0010075633,0.00053716055,0.09537587,0.40881565,0.00011747942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9508649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97263813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12200668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12200668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22135694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8852245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602021631","doi":"10.11575/prism/30049","title":"Compliance, Not Enforcement: A Comparative Evaluation of Best Practice Regulation for Hydraulic Fracturing","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Enforcement; Hydraulic fracturing; Business; Best practice; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Petroleum engineering; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.47301032253752456,"score_gpt":0.5114695262236514,"score_spread":0.03845920368612682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602021631","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7168022,0.010190936,0.014992182,0.021025693,0.0006886627,0.0036740077,0.00043999738,0.00012075005,0.23206568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895504,0.0009945413,0.0034474249,0.0027843819,0.00017408704,0.0014925947,0.00011737244,0.000038636874,0.0014005365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.517975,0.29255304,0.024522053,0.011024719,0.14353783,0.010387272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3338168,0.5317558,0.04965029,0.018963568,0.061885275,0.003928386],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2907572,0.00050504814,0.0020287249,0.013071149,0.0068211243,0.014729611,0.0056041977,0.0074286396,0.0057435115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.47061035,0.0007950099,0.0022638352,0.011200923,0.021110022,0.014813288,0.012446716,0.006077076,0.0003503927],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005338634,0.0050963056,0.060600568,0.012367872,0.0025915443,0.00071180257,0.14438914,0.006324718,0.002481862,0.49650106,0.011551074,0.25204548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003762729,0.028720709,0.38799283,0.016940607,0.0041660853,0.00056902185,0.3298302,0.012136952,0.007930133,0.07561286,0.13134044,0.0009975374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0111091975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018542793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2907572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03314968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02143467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87462264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603315218","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1321","title":"Out of Sync: Section 8 and Technological Advancement in Supreme Court Jurisprudence","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Charter; Supreme court; Statutory law; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Enforcement; Phone; Law enforcement; Internet privacy; Sociology; Computer science; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.05558990262627044,"score_gpt":0.34674789400514555,"score_spread":0.2911579913788751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603315218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026173715,0.14122656,0.0072624236,0.3126186,0.0024868029,0.00007199017,0.00018953867,0.00012228552,0.50984806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71841335,0.08327555,0.007155994,0.13736872,0.00486415,0.00015559826,0.00024498848,0.0001983733,0.048323236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95298344,0.010656654,0.0019825324,0.0041449647,0.025143577,0.0050888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94184667,0.04096046,0.0037266118,0.002309792,0.010023409,0.0011331049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033286307,0.00040346134,0.00087498233,0.008367806,0.012743214,0.022440048,0.004038335,0.011050389,0.0041809655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059217766,0.000763193,0.0009778468,0.0090082465,0.048446286,0.011341962,0.006054221,0.015838217,0.00075519364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005704261,0.000007404086,0.0004211309,0.00008334253,0.0000057395014,0.00014938482,0.0022750732,0.00021893263,0.000050202743,0.9703005,0.012906745,0.013575869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021339127,0.000031827727,0.0048727645,0.002174705,0.000042919906,0.00025081978,0.0037491217,0.00071032305,0.0003645549,0.2732648,0.71442145,0.000095373754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4473575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4554614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4473575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055056006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.076646306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8895072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604920721","doi":"","title":"Drawing Lines In The Disappearing Sand: A Re-Evaluation Of Shoreline Rights And Regimes A Quarter Century After Bell v. Town Of Wells","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ocean and coastal law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Shore; Oceanography; Archaeology; Geology; Geography","score_opus":0.025946072450838385,"score_gpt":0.2741303071459205,"score_spread":0.24818423469508213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604920721","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093083695,0.032383516,0.0061055063,0.45210478,0.0048896438,0.00013188008,0.0001941556,0.000082382016,0.4110244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6866999,0.016341714,0.0026173985,0.19318931,0.0020715378,0.0001545757,0.00013946743,0.00017602784,0.09861013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874642,0.004336428,0.000545933,0.0017971896,0.0036545196,0.0022017052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98970604,0.0061406656,0.00033231758,0.0005103758,0.0026429319,0.0006676022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013295039,0.00045518676,0.0005200804,0.0018807227,0.016323574,0.018502887,0.0028801935,0.015803322,0.0053295074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024879122,0.0006021039,0.0007060267,0.0017523658,0.028674481,0.020809572,0.0058189086,0.020725917,0.0005573111],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023278133,0.000028263084,0.00096186914,0.000063797444,0.000011642969,0.00027379487,0.017524492,0.00014433397,0.00019735078,0.9162274,0.04592882,0.01861488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006857018,0.00012158662,0.004530348,0.0019359471,0.00007887083,0.00016953248,0.051963143,0.0005381938,0.0009761635,0.16486713,0.77460206,0.00014843472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20709534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31323928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20709534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022866817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024779832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41177982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605077909","doi":"10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.80","title":"Competency to Stand Trial in the American Legal System","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Competence (human resources); Officer; Psychology; Law; Mental illness; Criminal justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Criminal procedure; Mental health; Social psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.08126889273112033,"score_gpt":0.45396468085595,"score_spread":0.3726957881248297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605077909","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24961016,0.003319744,0.0065459753,0.15165284,0.0008398624,0.00011188152,0.00018761214,0.0001418639,0.58759004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9568945,0.00089527486,0.002330437,0.014744373,0.00033941388,0.000056802404,0.000053052463,0.000022311235,0.024663966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954873,0.0013935248,0.00021917526,0.00044792413,0.0010426567,0.0014094458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98944587,0.003684339,0.0007637292,0.00043871583,0.002681816,0.0029855086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062690647,0.0001247931,0.00020423916,0.0018033973,0.011599828,0.006738517,0.0010920434,0.0040092194,0.012846737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011006417,0.00029039555,0.00027552777,0.0013005834,0.008908601,0.00403198,0.004571058,0.006611803,0.0008268802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014190394,0.00008939367,0.0069378535,0.000026586544,0.0000039676274,0.00049503957,0.0037527368,0.00036749296,0.00012907317,0.9332424,0.031311527,0.023629647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058113565,0.0001216155,0.034946524,0.00048105782,0.000024446326,0.0010317427,0.007270981,0.0061463104,0.000464464,0.51391,0.43537644,0.00016842567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.112198405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1712827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.112198405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012712852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023014363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22309071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606300689","doi":"","title":"No Right to Assisted Suicide Under European Human Rights Convention","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Human rights; Supreme court; Political science; Convention; Conscience; Fundamental rights; International human rights law","score_opus":0.022068586053874656,"score_gpt":0.30806097198189053,"score_spread":0.2859923859280159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606300689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029420465,0.008309535,0.0035517921,0.056943797,0.0026038233,0.00011592423,0.0001964516,0.00009132494,0.8987669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5144633,0.0029374978,0.0036179307,0.20294942,0.0011740011,0.00033880855,0.0003378119,0.00011210001,0.27406904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9794897,0.005080105,0.0015776516,0.003303828,0.0060703936,0.004478436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99566615,0.0015983583,0.00044107327,0.00072735595,0.0012174115,0.0003496016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009512497,0.00064374483,0.00068748184,0.0009388519,0.005088407,0.009447355,0.0018271374,0.019502463,0.008079567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016207227,0.0005762472,0.0012280565,0.0006906725,0.0077224826,0.005451012,0.008052181,0.011423092,0.0025224485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004567335,0.000023959543,0.0006835089,0.00006785905,0.000027853072,0.00042298168,0.002279368,0.000107607724,0.00033405796,0.95684034,0.028819012,0.0103477985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000978921,0.000098844655,0.0024485865,0.0005654759,0.000054524764,0.0010540459,0.0011055607,0.00022375523,0.0012888178,0.06945685,0.9234818,0.00012369246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031870916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032696668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031870916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004927044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009302613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063370764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607152550","doi":"","title":"St. John's University School of Law: A Profile","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œCatholic lawyer","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02678458915965182,"score_gpt":0.2933177452194329,"score_spread":0.26653315605978106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607152550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18759121,0.023032378,0.001421942,0.22552711,0.0038776246,0.0011166707,0.0053968495,0.00038186563,0.55165434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25015065,0.040656514,0.0020440738,0.019935582,0.002348359,0.00047507873,0.002217225,0.00022981106,0.68194276],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928826,0.000055666565,0.000029459958,0.00003151151,0.0003687983,0.00022632703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99473226,0.00012738538,0.00013864262,0.00003128774,0.0006335167,0.0043369373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088088826,0.00030371433,0.0003028039,0.0043665553,0.003658723,0.0033705265,0.00042999475,0.0012182705,0.044455692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016909327,0.00032532262,0.00012871271,0.0048865695,0.0006621548,0.0018220233,0.0019801192,0.0014129262,0.010844335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006840728,0.00033732533,0.031231975,0.00029336667,0.0000050755625,0.00044505825,0.0029864386,0.000099767865,0.0012105277,0.008637913,0.80685776,0.14782639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020736057,0.00013544117,0.100287735,0.0005170597,0.0000054322563,0.0007446831,0.0064860927,0.00020184253,0.00030691197,0.0012332287,0.89004093,0.000019930834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013673958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.101382434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044455692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00228049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008013479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14871907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2608062544","doi":"10.29173/alr519","title":"Recent Legislative and Regulatory Developments of Interest to Oil and Gas Lawyers","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Calgary Laboratory Services","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Nova scotia; Energy law; Political science; Fossil fuel; Petroleum industry; Law; Public administration; Environmental law; Engineering; Sociology; Waste management","score_opus":0.04583144941291671,"score_gpt":0.31347088161861675,"score_spread":0.2676394322057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2608062544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30014744,0.11043845,0.0041213506,0.24407087,0.004331645,0.0002112196,0.00074602966,0.00028597802,0.335647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74653,0.04819083,0.003647153,0.090883315,0.0040927064,0.00007351396,0.0007622284,0.00006134348,0.105759025],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99453074,0.00074647437,0.00025337463,0.00043098774,0.002832153,0.0012064138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97183233,0.011260965,0.0058059758,0.00033158204,0.008980893,0.0017881301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006611774,0.00017019098,0.00022774887,0.002447223,0.004663354,0.0058038966,0.0011335685,0.00402472,0.004987113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022404322,0.0004957639,0.00024907384,0.0037839185,0.0045312317,0.001190352,0.0010826797,0.0039334395,0.0004505749],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044670582,0.000412851,0.04502008,0.0025761228,0.00013975648,0.005316135,0.023722205,0.0041780937,0.011498314,0.33205706,0.23119116,0.3434415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024896726,0.00010939234,0.079839654,0.0003485591,0.00006853966,0.00049268565,0.005235537,0.00025798724,0.002158123,0.0037191373,0.9076716,0.000073947296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30852738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68357635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69147265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02534903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02829359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6134631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2608571048","doi":"","title":"Of Neighbours and Netizens, Or, Duty of Care in the Tech Age: A Comment on Cooper v. Hobart","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Cooper pair; Duty of care; Sociology; Law; Political science; Physics; Condensed matter physics; Superconductivity","score_opus":0.017258769762707158,"score_gpt":0.28612123636849524,"score_spread":0.26886246660578805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2608571048","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021602085,0.009434835,0.0014727224,0.66354835,0.0036931671,0.000094359864,0.0004578378,0.00008027265,0.29961637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14612971,0.0025797577,0.0006837486,0.7566125,0.0022589003,0.00015315009,0.000079970756,0.00011258943,0.09138973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99342406,0.001515743,0.00027442002,0.0010956768,0.0016174786,0.002072684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910471,0.006402416,0.00043422455,0.0002643921,0.001169239,0.00068268203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006524706,0.0007573702,0.0012565887,0.0008235917,0.02932234,0.012198217,0.005717058,0.048332978,0.0052445033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013012454,0.0013060438,0.001240468,0.0015090493,0.014087191,0.0052489676,0.0037493515,0.028557656,0.0012469218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094521645,0.000036080524,0.0015055973,0.00013872863,0.000029500912,0.002000825,0.020476278,0.00020270489,0.00046915852,0.5348349,0.4358388,0.0043729087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007477706,0.000048034224,0.0037840926,0.000711801,0.00012407893,0.0008139484,0.021272622,0.0005911391,0.0010406503,0.03132852,0.9400118,0.00019848492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6629151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80037415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6629151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019803584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022665761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67814004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2608578223","doi":"","title":"Review of Approaches to and Best Practices in the Regulation of Hydraulic Fracturing in Canada: Appendix M of the Final Report of the Newfoundland & Labrador Hydraulic Fracturing Review Panel","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hydraulic fracturing; Best practice; Engineering; Environmental planning; Petroleum engineering; Law; Political science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.14152971420338187,"score_gpt":0.3215966750295495,"score_spread":0.1800669608261676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2608578223","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012618142,0.4454718,0.01592848,0.20625171,0.020670269,0.007292743,0.027106952,0.00084301515,0.26381692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09656378,0.5277302,0.042921532,0.07058154,0.0026252447,0.003375116,0.015759485,0.0005853327,0.23985773],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93816125,0.0058401492,0.0054713166,0.002529273,0.043072466,0.004925582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7505568,0.013765628,0.0062054624,0.0026874945,0.22350015,0.0032845414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04035277,0.0010293905,0.0011949382,0.018636871,0.0077469843,0.010627819,0.0063140653,0.004129469,0.005310389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06141213,0.0014197762,0.0013459168,0.029404346,0.00408124,0.0029583191,0.002341783,0.003639047,0.0017780352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054250933,0.000057640325,0.002253522,0.007500336,0.00007846668,0.0003135427,0.003237038,0.0011746623,0.0018858962,0.017534243,0.8398529,0.12605745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012333021,0.000021372112,0.008521837,0.0046681473,0.0000660814,0.00004583729,0.0011363239,0.00016678742,0.00076472305,0.00046152386,0.9840507,0.00008435931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9817749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98798954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85134155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14865844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4600766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9874355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2608806802","doi":"10.29173/alr521","title":"Recent Judicial Developments of Interest to Oil and Gas Lawyers","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Energy law; Petroleum industry; Law; Fossil fuel; Economics; Cover (algebra); Law and economics; Business; Political science; Environmental law; Environmental science; Engineering","score_opus":0.051009606954392175,"score_gpt":0.3241699117892353,"score_spread":0.27316030483484316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2608806802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11926944,0.16572738,0.0027095652,0.32364243,0.0060635055,0.000078913174,0.00036563748,0.00012774885,0.38201544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69586176,0.11457149,0.0025881247,0.09283045,0.015127896,0.000048534792,0.00053757377,0.00004997508,0.07838419],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947273,0.00093063945,0.00027461865,0.0006710948,0.0024305317,0.00096578593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9652253,0.01970798,0.004358684,0.0007265793,0.008648073,0.0013333152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006446621,0.00016805045,0.00030910125,0.0025056002,0.004353632,0.008399888,0.0015207835,0.008479789,0.006262364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027091207,0.0005604065,0.00032822922,0.0044256183,0.005150072,0.0025838297,0.001195105,0.0055751144,0.00069981284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009911599,0.00018695868,0.00883034,0.00076070393,0.000051753224,0.0035351128,0.0053043864,0.0016080689,0.0020050367,0.61028093,0.20870808,0.15862958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003805259,0.000052387873,0.017510686,0.00033865,0.00003946924,0.0009740455,0.002676063,0.00041964112,0.00079586054,0.017095106,0.9600073,0.00005264224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0897527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2735109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0897527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013318486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011835664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1784606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609094498","doi":"10.29173/alr490","title":"Recent Regulatory and Legislative Developments of Interest to Oil and Gas Lawyers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Energy law; Fossil fuel; Political science; Business; Public administration; Law; Environmental law; Engineering","score_opus":0.07631261855110284,"score_gpt":0.3192058481914503,"score_spread":0.24289322964034749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2609094498","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027714487,0.21816157,0.0021512227,0.53287625,0.007396768,0.00013046873,0.0004114578,0.00018371783,0.21097408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2844826,0.29968965,0.006185902,0.28128383,0.016226077,0.00013106216,0.00096820877,0.00013834727,0.11089431],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871452,0.002367287,0.0007713932,0.0012792728,0.006412898,0.0020238853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9492901,0.02363786,0.0058355806,0.0007223315,0.017932195,0.0025819156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01457342,0.00027728922,0.00038941187,0.0041946764,0.0056058965,0.010719248,0.0019337474,0.009258105,0.0070083635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035238083,0.0007183179,0.00048160632,0.008000897,0.0077310633,0.0028725825,0.0014866181,0.008510108,0.00081355456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011990427,0.00024291407,0.006187602,0.0024782352,0.00004835648,0.0013405373,0.0073851505,0.0018050793,0.0036729777,0.40203184,0.30012715,0.27456033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015681208,0.000043679294,0.012968417,0.00063173636,0.000031190564,0.00025205384,0.002375688,0.00017120816,0.0006148872,0.0071495874,0.9756889,0.000056955665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34404182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6620391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6559582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03259261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0620474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6840786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609726810","doi":"10.29173/alr499","title":"Recent Judicial Developments of Interest to Oil and Gas Lawyers","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freehold; Fossil fuel; Energy law; Law; Government (linguistics); Business; Judicial review; Conveyancing; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Environmental law; Engineering","score_opus":0.061356951221785465,"score_gpt":0.3290709010426418,"score_spread":0.26771394982085633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2609726810","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047676507,0.5868917,0.0010798136,0.16237508,0.0023249066,0.00008395896,0.0006190472,0.00007985944,0.19886912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37570179,0.5297406,0.0019666925,0.04530018,0.004240131,0.00003676842,0.00075690256,0.000043470376,0.042213608],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99054646,0.0009825956,0.00041858075,0.0006676779,0.0055943937,0.001790287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9633403,0.009731274,0.0033802618,0.00035369795,0.021222021,0.00197242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009012333,0.0002627083,0.00044113284,0.00842382,0.0062260167,0.009645534,0.0019056104,0.004036697,0.0057916357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025245111,0.0006012801,0.00036776374,0.01531286,0.0057139616,0.0017188239,0.0011071465,0.0036852786,0.0005416439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014456097,0.00011109885,0.011764154,0.0024730004,0.000091610025,0.0020957221,0.008585536,0.0018305982,0.0012747677,0.23097327,0.3485743,0.39208138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024244571,0.000029438928,0.026532602,0.00069936394,0.000050399984,0.00049899035,0.0031645622,0.00026545164,0.0003579835,0.0039447104,0.9643574,0.00007499313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8978672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96739364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1021328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07723427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07656889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56037647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611272792","doi":"","title":"The Fictitious Payee After Teva v. BMO: Has the Pendulum Swung Back Far Enough?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Cheque; Accounts payable; Business; Payment; Negotiable instrument; Accounting; Finance; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.022483142883396832,"score_gpt":0.2643073849316903,"score_spread":0.24182424204829348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611272792","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03536632,0.007750752,0.0012392228,0.7589185,0.0050381594,0.00004036155,0.00024219285,0.000052918123,0.19135158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37501836,0.0027715347,0.00060519634,0.4602933,0.0018772745,0.000043594064,0.00013569432,0.0000796985,0.15917537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538136,0.00066001294,0.00013940883,0.00061825936,0.001601416,0.0015996065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99726427,0.001339466,0.00015186214,0.00011358026,0.0006454624,0.00048544863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004052407,0.00031306437,0.00045371414,0.0004999633,0.014375908,0.011149328,0.002648622,0.024695335,0.0063819555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0099236155,0.00048169793,0.0005186798,0.0007668812,0.0076753367,0.0049092243,0.0017898091,0.02025048,0.0011446925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008021888,0.000027953078,0.0033848558,0.00008352684,0.000016360289,0.0017127426,0.014891917,0.000098199,0.0008652447,0.51138765,0.45379296,0.0136584025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004131282,0.000052173018,0.010490561,0.000569785,0.00006137432,0.00045224148,0.016537724,0.0004142662,0.0014036167,0.041762814,0.9280611,0.00015298833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62409556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82498515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62409556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02376894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021499809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75623643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612851079","doi":"","title":"Bush V. Gore: Is the Bloom Off the Robes?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Appeal; Political science; Economic Justice; Humanities; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.01065162298600387,"score_gpt":0.2720273898845859,"score_spread":0.26137576689858205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612851079","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007978354,0.040571146,0.0001423872,0.81247187,0.008050649,0.000034909728,0.00055828167,0.000027487751,0.1301649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23844737,0.046433013,0.00035214602,0.42303193,0.0055886237,0.00007132024,0.00045711192,0.00015070099,0.28546792],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990723,0.00018459477,0.000035986875,0.00013775827,0.00026423403,0.0003050878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888986,0.00041563364,0.000080546524,0.000029697409,0.00030309707,0.00028133212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010560644,0.0002393984,0.00036668062,0.0006138875,0.0073438208,0.005523204,0.000750136,0.004189453,0.022570869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006124656,0.00036030053,0.0001710066,0.0009216084,0.0037345188,0.0041751643,0.001422777,0.007177504,0.002494171],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002159187,0.000005881143,0.00080694084,0.00011971331,0.0000038241965,0.0004130897,0.005335968,0.000009657919,0.000108913955,0.0336227,0.94938046,0.01017129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052856453,0.0000061099863,0.0029515382,0.00032454537,0.0000044284516,0.00014861872,0.009682,0.000013028138,0.00007138071,0.003436086,0.98334485,0.000012064154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45933825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70538914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45933825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012764245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0116215795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9133292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613004266","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2818892","title":"The Law, Psychiatry and Pathologization of Gender-Confirming Surgery for Transgender Ontarians","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Transgender; Psychology; Sex reassignment surgery (male-to-female); Psychiatry; Psychoanalysis; Transsexual","score_opus":0.0353946780033841,"score_gpt":0.3105931860668426,"score_spread":0.2751985080634585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613004266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52451646,0.0055116904,0.0031169679,0.27610388,0.0017969965,0.00014636565,0.00010050598,0.00006139456,0.18864581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9572521,0.0014462379,0.0011052678,0.025640592,0.00045843353,0.000039936782,0.000019177856,0.000022572356,0.0140156485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939248,0.0028817914,0.0003543231,0.00026897047,0.0008452997,0.0017249039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9742363,0.015181326,0.0028381674,0.0010372703,0.0024801854,0.004226744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008033712,0.00011648145,0.00016906977,0.0014943598,0.013048045,0.004082413,0.0013652808,0.0056972597,0.0081817275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042091746,0.0004123258,0.00026022515,0.0005903803,0.009989364,0.0018532216,0.0062661185,0.0051088724,0.00074895774],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035127514,0.00069481635,0.14602233,0.000295393,0.000041422292,0.032574188,0.08336826,0.0008456318,0.0048959833,0.44862524,0.12590262,0.15638289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007839356,0.0005782669,0.13961048,0.0018213242,0.000103351485,0.029760236,0.26563647,0.0014912371,0.0069283824,0.16605301,0.38771752,0.00022138716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016380906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.066193335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9836191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036224322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028168924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042486787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613302742","doi":"10.29173/alr482","title":"Recent Judicial Decisions of Interest to Oil and Gas Lawyers","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Creditor; Energy law; Law; Fossil fuel; Judicial opinion; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Environmental law; Finance","score_opus":0.07317393158328371,"score_gpt":0.3524954744657324,"score_spread":0.27932154288244865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613302742","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030671712,0.673254,0.0012998991,0.10936658,0.0026126145,0.000106405794,0.00082440465,0.00009702903,0.18176736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25494054,0.6417381,0.0025799782,0.047339898,0.0032465658,0.00004066352,0.0010562964,0.000060514496,0.04899739],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98912036,0.0009778287,0.0005072519,0.0006859107,0.0072391396,0.0014695987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9709529,0.007100889,0.0022580463,0.0003163704,0.018171003,0.0012007087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009530932,0.00038069425,0.0004858618,0.0089520905,0.006755703,0.007470706,0.0021070554,0.0035208983,0.0040650032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02335201,0.0006613274,0.00043808043,0.016272087,0.004960889,0.0014901317,0.0010417392,0.0034044192,0.00058491854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107358996,0.00007300094,0.0068837553,0.002521546,0.00010138155,0.001207305,0.005959252,0.0021357292,0.0010976589,0.10016892,0.52795976,0.35178432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024227655,0.000023073302,0.017961694,0.0008881623,0.000081615486,0.00034397992,0.00208688,0.0002445395,0.0003378646,0.0028419595,0.97508687,0.000079256446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92691433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9823382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08282652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08282652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.080421835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60095125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613414015","doi":"","title":"Emerging privacy torts in Canada and New Zealand: an English perspective","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"City Research Online (City University London)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Internet privacy; Political science; Law; Business; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.04916275944464213,"score_gpt":0.33591559154947787,"score_spread":0.2867528321048357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613414015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17550372,0.047527123,0.002322151,0.20403033,0.0010212379,0.0002538542,0.0009961668,0.000035950212,0.5683095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83194065,0.023487875,0.001885524,0.033765808,0.0003386807,0.00013005456,0.00021880324,0.000060312283,0.10817229],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931768,0.000775779,0.00025546722,0.00059770624,0.0026119235,0.002582272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99475753,0.0017980745,0.0004601826,0.00017236288,0.001872798,0.0009390321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040320046,0.00047201748,0.000428692,0.002504105,0.018310446,0.012893706,0.0023948618,0.0075961654,0.007712908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009993666,0.00046629945,0.0006074949,0.0036705448,0.017365646,0.0055637504,0.0039784964,0.008132213,0.00042657513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000338243,0.000036967816,0.0037786115,0.00016871218,0.00001449403,0.0020909838,0.06303414,0.00034540586,0.00037474866,0.8850301,0.03067367,0.01441846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006488361,0.00004665522,0.05265523,0.0019208974,0.00010491139,0.0010930924,0.13678144,0.0011498667,0.00042256474,0.05939423,0.74611676,0.00024943546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99302566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99454814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14798506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14798506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13421856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9882166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613481975","doi":"10.29173/alr506","title":"Recent Developments of Interest to Oil and Gas Lawyers","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Energy law; Fossil fuel; Business; Law; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Environmental law; Engineering; Waste management","score_opus":0.08627037069827513,"score_gpt":0.3214399244744216,"score_spread":0.23516955377614646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613481975","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021207338,0.47078767,0.00060402346,0.26901034,0.0036761365,0.000060131435,0.0006268105,0.00008651795,0.23394102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24340324,0.56926656,0.0016371,0.06982509,0.0069749583,0.00003547265,0.0007815334,0.000051553863,0.108024515],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99336845,0.00059320097,0.00022966386,0.0004106325,0.0041180663,0.0012800951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9741667,0.006571957,0.0019487716,0.00020680278,0.0146696055,0.002436183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061907717,0.00023443025,0.00036537208,0.0063452376,0.0049012545,0.0081737805,0.0014296434,0.0039516687,0.011894353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015705612,0.00043294087,0.00025682003,0.010814546,0.0033941905,0.0015101387,0.0009567856,0.0028368481,0.0009081188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012308339,0.00009736921,0.007904711,0.0020170088,0.000047440477,0.001010678,0.0041982187,0.00084825105,0.0007895383,0.08619496,0.5109951,0.38577366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008794627,0.00001885563,0.012005766,0.0003064913,0.000019739435,0.00015211465,0.0015023503,0.000069888534,0.00016061436,0.0016631485,0.98406595,0.000026328622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96684027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94057083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05942915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08165617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43119073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616937611","doi":"10.29173/alr491","title":"Recent Judicial Developments of Interests to Oil and Gas Lawyers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Creditor; Energy law; Fossil fuel; Law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Environmental law; Finance; Engineering","score_opus":0.03285363821762997,"score_gpt":0.3395869987280314,"score_spread":0.3067333605104014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616937611","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017870639,0.7408913,0.0005052012,0.1053312,0.0020251863,0.000046436176,0.00040017377,0.00004212273,0.13288777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23515743,0.6987678,0.0011724883,0.037556168,0.0034402078,0.000027208755,0.00042526473,0.000038055812,0.023415415],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.988667,0.0011912544,0.00046867135,0.0008674734,0.0068710283,0.0019345244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95871645,0.011949021,0.0030080029,0.00041517205,0.02392271,0.0019885704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012247948,0.0003621275,0.0006036406,0.009361535,0.005782176,0.009656257,0.0023285612,0.004592292,0.005276779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025745353,0.00068487687,0.00046875147,0.016579116,0.0073104836,0.0018761962,0.001332199,0.004527914,0.00050387846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011581937,0.00009934069,0.006676867,0.0031998158,0.00011078471,0.0012096945,0.0071316306,0.0013479985,0.00095188455,0.27979448,0.3433289,0.3560329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022560407,0.000026550808,0.021513902,0.0014806353,0.00006479672,0.0003150902,0.0027724553,0.00018178392,0.00031431828,0.0041473517,0.96907806,0.000082603794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92898124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97424793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.095463976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.095463976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11128202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69264287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619707348","doi":"10.29173/alr488","title":"Principles of Kyoto and Emissions Trading Systems: A Primer for Energy Lawyers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kyoto Protocol; Emissions trading; Greenhouse gas; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Clean Development Mechanism; Business; Climate change; Government (linguistics); Climate change mitigation; International trade; Economics; Natural resource economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06805492274857106,"score_gpt":0.3205381381756745,"score_spread":0.25248321542710345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2619707348","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018264921,0.16936807,0.02008395,0.6320918,0.0053640325,0.00014538018,0.00008941925,0.00008758058,0.17094326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20165983,0.21665308,0.033233646,0.3558717,0.016172769,0.0010073582,0.00019975675,0.00029459022,0.1749073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870805,0.0058441376,0.0006285299,0.0008010543,0.0043670186,0.0012787352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876974,0.009476158,0.00048096574,0.0004360267,0.0016138544,0.00029555548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014323822,0.0006768239,0.0006545379,0.002776175,0.007656156,0.014361464,0.0032864832,0.0174726,0.0030515885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019281546,0.00068225316,0.0006450957,0.0037781708,0.039093964,0.014420408,0.0037864107,0.018194044,0.0011259891],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019336635,0.000011555129,0.000050089668,0.000044603774,0.0000016007947,0.000043335604,0.0013145953,0.00013396729,0.000034521076,0.9539824,0.0364644,0.007916978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006937483,0.000009768037,0.00017283704,0.00037942213,0.0000029790544,0.000055775006,0.0014954554,0.0001951438,0.00004800972,0.38350576,0.6141141,0.000013848058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08264795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.078357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08264795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019886114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031030208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16433376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621087158","doi":"","title":"Personal Jurisdiction in the Data Age: MacDermid v. Deiter's Adaptation of International Shoe Amidst Supreme Court Uncertainty","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maine law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Personal jurisdiction; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.06082935640126188,"score_gpt":0.3381627950855944,"score_spread":0.2773334386843325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621087158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12274938,0.008427515,0.015275051,0.2782486,0.0010815552,0.000094440635,0.00018657012,0.000086435284,0.5738504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9429141,0.000910776,0.0018466827,0.036937952,0.00029829168,0.000050917643,0.000023146247,0.000027015656,0.016991172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99154097,0.003045155,0.00024307385,0.0016811105,0.0022001578,0.0012896099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99301153,0.0047801477,0.0003142731,0.00067634904,0.0007701663,0.00044747966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011651748,0.00022890791,0.0004743198,0.0012624772,0.010242093,0.012930316,0.0024069462,0.010644618,0.003180643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02074214,0.00040603997,0.0004595415,0.0013439768,0.029521259,0.01012632,0.005882789,0.012529767,0.00029701003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009153168,0.0000059650724,0.0002754225,0.0000056546455,0.0000024660121,0.00020313438,0.0057657994,0.00012094823,0.000059088365,0.9845955,0.006703889,0.0022529208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005364373,0.000040901832,0.0022192306,0.000338947,0.000032102074,0.00039947388,0.009027069,0.0017623011,0.0008462034,0.64959276,0.33557653,0.00011082004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14013849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15624835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14013849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015674768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010875468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27864563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624265922","doi":"10.29173/alr675","title":"The Iroquois Pipeline Project: A Study in Federal/State Conflict","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pipeline (software); Authorization; State (computer science); Process (computing); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Business; Public administration; Operations research; Engineering; Sociology; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.04541077352948219,"score_gpt":0.3738125880105131,"score_spread":0.3284018144810309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2624265922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67332244,0.008122054,0.0022029153,0.03706468,0.00018228417,0.00012960123,0.00012411889,0.000030577627,0.27882132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770298,0.0030341644,0.00048617146,0.0032811398,0.00006666048,0.00008646976,0.00006617782,0.000018877394,0.015930561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99319357,0.003174414,0.00014590115,0.00035450654,0.0015492621,0.0015824294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98835003,0.008566945,0.0011600566,0.00020976512,0.00095670216,0.0007565171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008090025,0.00024348717,0.00031515464,0.0034685917,0.019883284,0.007810991,0.0017886756,0.00405275,0.005006658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013854981,0.0003242621,0.00025632637,0.0068328027,0.016567295,0.00481572,0.0039850627,0.005161175,0.00027252384],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043436103,0.00019471614,0.01998312,0.0001120556,0.000014316687,0.0015880708,0.14547206,0.00057235657,0.00018504735,0.7754054,0.022725005,0.033704393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005974514,0.00017290418,0.106192775,0.00052264746,0.00003760859,0.0010574552,0.49160632,0.0011439392,0.00072420767,0.047352936,0.35102403,0.00010547349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3172161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4209957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6827839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02482075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026844917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6307394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2635633351","doi":"","title":"The Development of Medical Marihuana Law in Canada and its Effect on Michigan Marihuana Statutes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan State international law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01996899898648709,"score_gpt":0.32663443389989427,"score_spread":0.3066654349134072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2635633351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41960257,0.008770537,0.0014386155,0.1928232,0.00042579405,0.00020366006,0.0015688224,0.00009210383,0.37507468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93546915,0.004205734,0.0014153281,0.013437605,0.00015703103,0.00006683391,0.0003024189,0.000043021537,0.044902824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99364835,0.000671803,0.00014615254,0.00035861987,0.0031717785,0.002003285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98427194,0.0042004082,0.0010181721,0.00019899965,0.007586474,0.0027239644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035836245,0.0002549814,0.00030543513,0.0047212187,0.014232176,0.008343204,0.0027129129,0.0033265343,0.008275507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021117536,0.00057532993,0.00073012686,0.004372708,0.0064503634,0.0018777944,0.0027750875,0.005597198,0.00027395927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016187961,0.0001975684,0.088578194,0.00013673946,0.00012544148,0.00071193546,0.007289395,0.0020580546,0.0014894464,0.766454,0.07458507,0.05821232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013446058,0.00021713434,0.5770584,0.0011121684,0.0003370842,0.00034127204,0.021096116,0.0064837723,0.0040726806,0.031973172,0.35687515,0.00029866284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9924663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15387663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15387663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25445873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9813832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W26477208","doi":"10.1177/0306312715575054","title":"Rosario Esparza, Sr., and Consuelo Esparza, Plaintiffs v. Pierre Foods, n/k/a Advanced Pierre Foods, Inc., Defendant.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Studies of Science","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.036068973080222014,"score_gpt":0.3362157129895857,"score_spread":0.3001467399093637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W26477208","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03671484,0.024069188,0.0018589488,0.56852144,0.003455894,0.0001359756,0.00062136067,0.00022615101,0.36439615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36543876,0.012245467,0.0036598742,0.18783975,0.0011243396,0.00012319218,0.00046055534,0.00015409007,0.428954],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762934,0.00035524933,0.00008630879,0.0002577297,0.0010957393,0.0005756239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99611807,0.002061277,0.00016802478,0.000099043995,0.0012101707,0.0003434826],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027879702,0.00054488075,0.0003283779,0.0010405167,0.013318166,0.003860709,0.0014085565,0.010632593,0.011748548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008790104,0.00047949783,0.0005685688,0.00077622785,0.0021599764,0.001916346,0.0014479788,0.0085248705,0.0020063014],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012680421,0.00006854314,0.0060258196,0.00015879062,0.000031732994,0.002194638,0.004848268,0.00036125604,0.0011123602,0.18757047,0.77073663,0.026764708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006610726,0.000067732544,0.012166555,0.00045330115,0.00011556479,0.00069176056,0.008978094,0.00083716016,0.0027862804,0.03997611,0.9337648,0.00009655357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22288105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41128865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9866818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006143793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0116351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44316745},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["insufficient_payload"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W264846025","doi":"","title":"Written and Oral Persuasion in the United States Courts: A District Judge's Perspective on Their History, Function, and Future","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Argument (complex analysis); Adversarial system; Persuasion; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.018343817006556705,"score_gpt":0.3047617679055159,"score_spread":0.2864179508989592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W264846025","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.073212065,0.16434368,0.0017350294,0.2525697,0.0028255093,0.000041202762,0.000117033036,0.00005923332,0.50509655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93240064,0.01559976,0.0009690795,0.016281534,0.0010581762,0.000061559,0.000038571274,0.000026696378,0.033564024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922255,0.004270407,0.00036460493,0.0005921688,0.0013938686,0.0011535527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879865,0.006747902,0.0011032842,0.00039333163,0.00226101,0.0015079948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005234308,0.00022732386,0.0004200263,0.002673572,0.010153327,0.026462177,0.0014506542,0.0066380524,0.0042446535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012264653,0.00039591943,0.0002811004,0.0026460222,0.013529171,0.006928431,0.0043413946,0.008350154,0.00037553255],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004445478,0.00011975179,0.002358525,0.00018086155,0.000009152842,0.00032280886,0.048582043,0.00013503442,0.00016274242,0.8445568,0.028399933,0.07512789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041903964,0.00014064055,0.015556293,0.0017324185,0.000030457506,0.00043031818,0.07860679,0.00047094643,0.0007667535,0.11038069,0.7917289,0.00011373613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039899494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.073488586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039899494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013214569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009835873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09587884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2727564952","doi":"","title":"Canada v. United States of America","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography; History of the United States; Archaeology","score_opus":0.010791714715945488,"score_gpt":0.24134614877763563,"score_spread":0.23055443406169016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2727564952","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037824865,0.0074669085,0.0011488985,0.11598297,0.0021138864,0.00031039183,0.005291378,0.0002638528,0.8295969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28227246,0.006343922,0.0019684376,0.19030412,0.000416269,0.00029095897,0.0014208024,0.00015606463,0.516827],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99326104,0.00030232093,0.00018580888,0.0004143148,0.0032357713,0.0026007197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913201,0.0019907204,0.00035353663,0.00019606226,0.0048715225,0.0012680752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019949358,0.00058317534,0.0006915857,0.0031376502,0.025151838,0.008032094,0.0021880153,0.013088555,0.022061834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011440742,0.000941625,0.0011434419,0.004207245,0.0027334914,0.0020237127,0.001991735,0.008343799,0.0019889248],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008405,0.00007344323,0.007180497,0.00014035955,0.00007058118,0.0006085451,0.0017542542,0.00034237403,0.00045984788,0.2930805,0.67811024,0.018095324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014972466,0.000034418117,0.021776656,0.00045639215,0.00022348922,0.00025370164,0.0029576197,0.00065726985,0.0008125457,0.01784091,0.9546514,0.000185959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9912731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99603695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048296668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048296668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24844217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3504185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2728048982","doi":"","title":"Emerging from the Haze of America's War on Drugs and Examining Canada's New Half-Baked Laws","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham international law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Haze; Political science; Law; Geography; Meteorology","score_opus":0.013802225428663875,"score_gpt":0.2592427467225681,"score_spread":0.2454405212939042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2728048982","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30647564,0.0051882504,0.0015903695,0.36124483,0.0008391863,0.00008185883,0.0003848046,0.000037596736,0.32415748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92359227,0.0018276565,0.00066524954,0.032673594,0.00013574332,0.000021791193,0.00006949301,0.000049571438,0.040964644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99461347,0.00064108445,0.00005735453,0.00027554706,0.0014343282,0.0029782124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923463,0.0026989882,0.00039900347,0.00020723848,0.0025308046,0.0018175688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041350536,0.00037449115,0.0004246712,0.0022866053,0.038990915,0.021721238,0.0025089562,0.009846286,0.010728227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012537267,0.00039896692,0.00061898475,0.0031192135,0.02866042,0.0063979225,0.004860643,0.014046329,0.00040793733],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062748564,0.000072251816,0.010869996,0.000067603236,0.00002144002,0.00095931994,0.10630858,0.00055854354,0.0004194393,0.7774722,0.08653679,0.016650978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003940996,0.000038764938,0.029349508,0.00051141594,0.00008069866,0.00016846946,0.38511926,0.0010892897,0.0008731329,0.11692869,0.46564007,0.00016133384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.987259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11439446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11439446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21123637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82999384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734877033","doi":"","title":"Lawrence Solomon: If Voters Want to Rip Up Ontario’s Outrageous Renewable Energy Contracts, the Courts Won’t Stop Them","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Renewable energy; Law; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.02579643519589863,"score_gpt":0.2565628021366177,"score_spread":0.23076636694071906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734877033","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011330268,0.0022440252,0.00033857624,0.8985687,0.0020782184,0.000039212708,0.0003863363,0.00004408362,0.084970504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12143514,0.0022145004,0.0005853159,0.5455389,0.00096906413,0.000068867004,0.00014334798,0.00008556312,0.3289592],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960376,0.00054102484,0.00013163075,0.0005271641,0.0015368764,0.0012256056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99326867,0.0029890854,0.0002574962,0.00015777201,0.0022555839,0.0010714432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038613142,0.0003657336,0.00043802054,0.00052322604,0.022999614,0.008624268,0.0015205685,0.018308375,0.015247012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014602696,0.00047562845,0.00041645873,0.00088907516,0.0052812137,0.0041928543,0.0013602911,0.013405185,0.002096281],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055475444,0.000018810113,0.0025564095,0.00005634008,0.000021932856,0.00025623394,0.0047092717,0.0000989821,0.00032867846,0.08741123,0.9000168,0.004469818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045092343,0.000013019655,0.0048878337,0.00017767007,0.00003707646,0.000057077243,0.01132089,0.00025283723,0.0006107357,0.012619691,0.9698618,0.00011634799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92362297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9728721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076377034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03764816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06203216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27315778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742639630","doi":"10.5204/qutlr.v16i1.613","title":"Permitting Voluntary Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide: Law Reform Pathways for Common Law Jurisdictions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Law reform; Law; Political science; Discretion; Jury; Legislation; Nullification; Reform Act; Assisted suicide","score_opus":0.09939074364770284,"score_gpt":0.36755375413076546,"score_spread":0.2681630104830626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742639630","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072664954,0.080862366,0.0042419713,0.66602576,0.0015219322,0.0005665663,0.00015389569,0.00007106336,0.17389144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81471103,0.051773857,0.005976399,0.1034857,0.0006361178,0.00033503605,0.00014528252,0.000048097012,0.022888476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869218,0.0045683277,0.0006844501,0.0010106352,0.0028672232,0.0039475732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813089,0.00841426,0.0017117102,0.0006076381,0.0048314445,0.0031260978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015794298,0.00023935389,0.00048908725,0.002199168,0.00985588,0.013166813,0.0031082206,0.011485199,0.0044507454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036764752,0.00043307486,0.00083463883,0.0019038954,0.020830953,0.0062511275,0.0063908184,0.01139807,0.00028801052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021866068,0.00008177383,0.0027298226,0.000566612,0.000020879259,0.00070177316,0.010199815,0.0006572451,0.00026536649,0.9087573,0.018498925,0.057498574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015700459,0.00034822128,0.03384744,0.0078509515,0.00019052185,0.0011127093,0.044048734,0.0017204821,0.0010604173,0.17762809,0.731813,0.00022234806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69593614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8265554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69593614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06457479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18815924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6117091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743881733","doi":"","title":"Humiliated by Strip Search, Toronto Man Wants Watchdog’s Ruling Quashed","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.019624094727621905,"score_gpt":0.31264585640412307,"score_spread":0.2930217616765012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2743881733","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.113669775,0.0027259286,0.001437254,0.41525006,0.0039304746,0.00012180188,0.0005665797,0.00027812767,0.46202007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4474761,0.00080447993,0.0008558591,0.10646278,0.0010101647,0.00003715832,0.00015925558,0.00013664496,0.44305754],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997417,0.00025255262,0.00006259122,0.00033351994,0.00086649845,0.0010678011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959098,0.0015571421,0.00017961847,0.00021450844,0.00086843123,0.0012705091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002234895,0.00033969586,0.0004530615,0.00087605894,0.02525314,0.009734242,0.0012902785,0.012676605,0.017938375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010522788,0.00057210634,0.00052415323,0.00081021705,0.0068556373,0.0021005664,0.0021004435,0.014152128,0.0017616904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091526315,0.00003843296,0.009170613,0.0000429294,0.000054565,0.0033516616,0.020073669,0.00028566198,0.0011198547,0.16515616,0.787412,0.013202863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049898186,0.00006617746,0.016489282,0.00016292832,0.00006637549,0.0005151604,0.023209516,0.0007329849,0.0012587083,0.013232546,0.9440962,0.00012024082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73472553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9251344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26527447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020791678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025534881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5336734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W274710323","doi":"","title":"Supreme Court Preview. (Looking at the Law)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutionality; Conviction; Supreme court; Life imprisonment; Prison; Political science; Punishment (psychology); Equal Protection Clause; Criminal law; Common law; Psychology","score_opus":0.041159620802117505,"score_gpt":0.30070436431906705,"score_spread":0.25954474351694956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W274710323","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012175805,0.0067915753,0.0003332064,0.037424926,0.006104667,0.0001809513,0.004814325,0.0002997814,0.94283295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0087244995,0.0019620794,0.0002705408,0.099290244,0.0030894126,0.00041356444,0.0015892632,0.0001493564,0.88451105],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824667,0.00015426472,0.00007881852,0.00030340007,0.00075367483,0.0004632806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882513,0.0003693669,0.000045181514,0.00010557464,0.000492367,0.0001623927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011149468,0.0010492702,0.00063509046,0.001835389,0.0087253135,0.008154224,0.0024704693,0.017553933,0.1287759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003678991,0.0011511347,0.0011157506,0.0019890412,0.0016218957,0.0032630404,0.00221701,0.010643715,0.089609355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013915664,0.000051952517,0.000306859,0.000035002362,0.000004205087,0.00012596002,0.00013599823,0.00006580084,0.00013649641,0.03268719,0.95543754,0.01099902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002365499,0.00001751843,0.001851768,0.00018357749,0.000008247396,0.00004965541,0.00016626588,0.00009475749,0.000079339516,0.00740562,0.99009794,0.000021662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11803071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21182707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1287759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055773887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007793612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4307983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756562363","doi":"","title":"Alberta Law Reform Institute","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.013343710348467073,"score_gpt":0.2379567838292309,"score_spread":0.22461307348076384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756562363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011153148,0.0022947476,0.00024169606,0.012144756,0.0011119439,0.000051157174,0.0015903993,0.0002810019,0.98116887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031439401,0.00055630784,0.00027268848,0.0013440439,0.00008130807,0.00001556027,0.00036986842,0.00004551106,0.9941707],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977435,0.00012465857,0.000033861335,0.0002597607,0.0014113702,0.00042682432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976865,0.00023040232,0.00004501271,0.00015456343,0.0013423755,0.00054112624],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010521825,0.00074445695,0.0005889398,0.0031783958,0.008539921,0.006947558,0.0018158789,0.003999902,0.35940883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028937883,0.00070971,0.00045561025,0.0024770082,0.0017304725,0.0014510737,0.001982833,0.004101006,0.08161628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016788468,0.000047539823,0.0003948914,0.00003383433,0.000003977095,0.00007720678,0.00011286945,0.0001127567,0.000069213456,0.038940147,0.9220558,0.038134906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007199078,0.000003781316,0.000972809,0.000043946042,0.000003384627,0.000017781562,0.00013127086,0.00010114826,0.00007288014,0.0024561947,0.99618214,0.0000074444292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7319523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9105261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9750306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024969386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05140984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91372555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757365176","doi":"","title":"New Brunswick. Supreme Court","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | United Kingdom Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02768971995276146,"score_gpt":0.2831824010391151,"score_spread":0.2554926810863536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2757365176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008145119,0.004095918,0.00018926259,0.0052528344,0.000840401,0.00004492059,0.010413083,0.00026088738,0.97808814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0044562225,0.0020605205,0.00022495067,0.0012847065,0.00005715227,0.000044442408,0.002135995,0.00019407501,0.989542],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990677,0.000076595614,0.000073037736,0.00019777294,0.00037447026,0.00021042323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866104,0.00029330028,0.00009313959,0.00021258813,0.00059260067,0.00014736128],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006125648,0.0010297161,0.0008729745,0.0045167725,0.0054698037,0.007411761,0.002619138,0.0047918116,0.57110023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002930554,0.0017254748,0.0007180154,0.0089816125,0.0014697654,0.0036181835,0.001803714,0.005461885,0.2303093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022587481,0.000018887455,0.00049918273,0.00017235932,0.000009060564,0.00028377192,0.00016779132,0.00016929096,0.00010776357,0.05157949,0.8880824,0.058887344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013962851,0.0000023683313,0.0013525944,0.00023028438,0.000006982974,0.000055756038,0.00021636332,0.000074743715,0.00012080563,0.005934928,0.9919723,0.00001885714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.631104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8641976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57110023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017678548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01377644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.742137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759122353","doi":"","title":"Prince George's County - Board Of Education - Issuance Of Credit Cards - Prohibition Pg 411-15 (HB 707)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maryland | Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Business; Political science; History","score_opus":0.0183376068246481,"score_gpt":0.29664823918850985,"score_spread":0.2783106323638618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759122353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022521239,0.0023979268,0.0011345507,0.04288341,0.00694107,0.0013718026,0.0034724718,0.0007525225,0.9185249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02295359,0.00043228664,0.0006653586,0.02416875,0.00048866676,0.0004462318,0.0003959039,0.00006582824,0.9503834],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99588263,0.00041153224,0.00028017422,0.00065606594,0.0012594147,0.001510266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958532,0.0018076327,0.0002342462,0.000257576,0.0010033994,0.00084405305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031973456,0.00086677226,0.0007402492,0.0011991195,0.011996188,0.0050452827,0.002906728,0.023418717,0.08496062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008773074,0.0017246093,0.00069575675,0.00089311245,0.0020081506,0.0012403257,0.0030554044,0.012851463,0.034296963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013072701,0.00035927066,0.002674932,0.00012523297,0.000018002609,0.0007023624,0.0008740299,0.00015007191,0.001297945,0.037026078,0.93547916,0.021162054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000102369646,0.00015532527,0.019165576,0.0002583929,0.000028787277,0.00018173015,0.0007658604,0.00020512089,0.001538929,0.0023977493,0.97513074,0.00006945754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28929973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6136309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28929973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005572437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024064496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5752317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759507286","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Deradicalization of the Wagner Act Model:The Impact of B.C. Health Services and Fraser","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.018895149944001318,"score_gpt":0.2939634375256757,"score_spread":0.2750682875816744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759507286","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0746249,0.0042364174,0.007849832,0.08349288,0.0008010768,0.00018381908,0.0002111713,0.00006141481,0.8285385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.932959,0.0016018578,0.0022164704,0.012071894,0.00030242515,0.00014658619,0.00006438794,0.000045377856,0.05059206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9793937,0.0069139535,0.0004464184,0.0019013418,0.006605726,0.0047387215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912776,0.0046998635,0.00048078937,0.00088399334,0.0018674516,0.0007903152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0163182,0.000462593,0.0005657934,0.002698588,0.017118622,0.017425977,0.0026655064,0.0071344916,0.0046475907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022442512,0.0005901862,0.0009133149,0.0018242092,0.029483913,0.0057976707,0.0050062137,0.010183865,0.0007646559],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048902257,0.0000060131015,0.0001715428,0.0000041598105,0.0000015842509,0.000022591308,0.0008457239,0.00018278963,0.000027610216,0.99583864,0.0018307217,0.0010637345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011017086,0.000068761154,0.0043544844,0.0005116754,0.00009461739,0.00013411164,0.008275515,0.0050368784,0.0010699126,0.7023421,0.27783695,0.00016492033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66297245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72712874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92916524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07083473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08899112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67802477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762010100","doi":"","title":"Digest of British Columbia case law : being the cases determined in the courts of British Columbia and on appeal therefrom [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.01180223798376326,"score_gpt":0.22266555461002524,"score_spread":0.21086331662626198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762010100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061597354,0.06973459,0.0023319616,0.06001152,0.00787527,0.0001971101,0.021444192,0.00045280295,0.83179283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0335513,0.018316712,0.0020738246,0.008858349,0.0008526741,0.00010825926,0.008350531,0.00022527389,0.927663],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926883,0.00006351544,0.000044373748,0.00006871548,0.0004273929,0.00012713371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979253,0.00037594876,0.000078544064,0.00014609675,0.0012127537,0.0002613912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010018813,0.0007486488,0.00040487864,0.0046167276,0.0067402218,0.0052212775,0.0011607789,0.0027706546,0.045164023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030891441,0.00054177584,0.00029985665,0.0063337306,0.002478664,0.0019432452,0.0010567176,0.0024489253,0.009846499],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070966444,0.0000052149026,0.0003106015,0.000058400325,0.0000013004784,0.000037699072,0.00042840652,0.000054030275,0.000081294675,0.010068601,0.97501636,0.013930998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024451415,0.0000025692157,0.005318439,0.0002318266,0.000004124385,0.00007993815,0.00077652145,0.000096139906,0.00010523507,0.0034791173,0.98988754,0.000016214577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9216754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9758966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078324616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038729697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045409597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28100497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762170593","doi":"","title":"Kazemi Estate v. Islamic Republic of Iran and the Doctrine of State Immunity under Canadian Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Estate; Islam; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Sharia; Islamic republic; Philosophy; Mathematics; Theology","score_opus":0.04242137595012278,"score_gpt":0.2757057562862098,"score_spread":0.233284380336087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762170593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12304194,0.0027607223,0.0017372902,0.06696803,0.00043638246,0.00013454269,0.00018471079,0.000041652555,0.8046948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9310067,0.00095751736,0.0009010124,0.011138567,0.0001828465,0.00004097626,0.00003373915,0.000020537263,0.055718202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99343383,0.0008029561,0.00014157509,0.0003683186,0.0017342098,0.0035190936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996031,0.0019740032,0.00022623627,0.00015593036,0.0012397749,0.00037320197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038228908,0.0003326493,0.00046970506,0.0018649821,0.02914268,0.010644358,0.002329271,0.012117492,0.005569439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011680386,0.00050706544,0.0007291624,0.0023850878,0.019918254,0.003686921,0.0028424286,0.009772878,0.00033066585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014660201,0.000014752667,0.0007453124,0.000012151114,0.0000053426847,0.00016123416,0.004401314,0.00014708718,0.00006172929,0.9829774,0.009074341,0.0023847846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018641811,0.000088141875,0.019320073,0.0003880562,0.00013223928,0.00042989213,0.025917798,0.0026212388,0.0013163779,0.49166965,0.45762742,0.000302723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9376029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9667954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062397122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0455103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08351834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33020186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762313541","doi":"","title":"British Columbia. Supreme Court","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.015201715039385172,"score_gpt":0.2465966546578671,"score_spread":0.23139493961848193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762313541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013041395,0.0036976843,0.00008832066,0.013814423,0.0019273343,0.00006527603,0.017710157,0.00031536497,0.96107733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009412987,0.0016734396,0.00012981963,0.0045556403,0.00019840545,0.00007534875,0.0036451742,0.00014528215,0.9801639],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857163,0.00009245868,0.000052944484,0.0001716789,0.0006496382,0.00046162246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976533,0.0002688941,0.00008801034,0.00016891274,0.001431752,0.00038912316],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071466767,0.00085238914,0.00083051104,0.0051458343,0.0107843485,0.007377692,0.0024129096,0.005683481,0.4565048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036648419,0.000919991,0.00064724893,0.0070815235,0.0012928926,0.0019582477,0.0015821529,0.005241066,0.14016117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011017305,0.000013619925,0.00032213255,0.000042721374,0.0000032068363,0.00006447457,0.000051607996,0.000044244443,0.000019500676,0.006190554,0.9767521,0.01648478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014899974,0.0000028580216,0.0033052359,0.00020812092,0.000009948495,0.000030355244,0.00024144752,0.00011769064,0.00006840171,0.0024020902,0.9935777,0.000021131298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90655303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9576254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4565048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027882706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03625763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77522993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765267238","doi":"","title":"Rewriting Hockey's Unwritten Rules: Moore v. Bertuzzi","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maine law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rewriting; Law and economics; Programming language; Law; Computer science; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.040414497346018305,"score_gpt":0.35957113208346725,"score_spread":0.31915663473744893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765267238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039610416,0.0053249854,0.0028926535,0.16827561,0.007027017,0.00017855443,0.00013481261,0.00015783196,0.7763982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4554127,0.002874038,0.0018234146,0.22288758,0.002380911,0.00027721227,0.00011707687,0.00021805066,0.31400907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99469537,0.0008164441,0.00019295048,0.0010171601,0.0018241237,0.0014540526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99711514,0.0012566324,0.00015382029,0.0002130823,0.00066273514,0.0005984875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045516393,0.0005054672,0.00034169125,0.0010787422,0.011712306,0.0077011734,0.0031568334,0.010005826,0.0068449024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016791621,0.0007738435,0.00048425532,0.0005388773,0.00784657,0.0036309666,0.0040763994,0.014582222,0.001699087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005726095,0.00007061888,0.0022719356,0.00007158308,0.00002664985,0.0014887168,0.012397379,0.00046260134,0.00044705268,0.5345775,0.4198336,0.028295096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051882696,0.00008561397,0.0044962033,0.00047073024,0.000053663138,0.0005966206,0.005869766,0.0006765066,0.0008085682,0.04340292,0.94335747,0.00012993572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34771338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47017214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34771338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014269788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014152687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69137895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765704983","doi":"","title":"Toronto Legal Clinic Launches Challenge to Mandatory Minimum Sentence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sentence; Political science; Business; Law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05265288418667979,"score_gpt":0.3705902467685467,"score_spread":0.3179373625818669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765704983","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0089627355,0.0005961263,0.00061459735,0.95938903,0.006486964,0.00007841452,0.00023477484,0.00020275814,0.02343458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.107939914,0.00061400357,0.0026485585,0.66758215,0.008010141,0.00018310011,0.00041478855,0.00029825052,0.212309],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9613341,0.003177871,0.001362043,0.00276313,0.019046152,0.01231668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9126115,0.023097435,0.0024734458,0.0023669272,0.016647419,0.04280327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020752631,0.0006660155,0.0010498551,0.0014770525,0.023200512,0.016530627,0.005985752,0.05671163,0.03117923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060915936,0.0016683453,0.0018054774,0.0008125087,0.006559267,0.0035336174,0.007940067,0.050813306,0.0049341675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039522387,0.000069685855,0.0021054721,0.00003226492,0.000016406675,0.00096406654,0.0008644928,0.00018636581,0.00044925278,0.03131069,0.95733863,0.0066230893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014560578,0.00018471079,0.019612331,0.00025644235,0.00003670084,0.00068570813,0.0033302715,0.0014572325,0.0008976945,0.014175456,0.95904243,0.0001754257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39641464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7834929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60358536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037023813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16327548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7882145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766300202","doi":"","title":"Canadian Human Rights Act","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.01826609359649322,"score_gpt":0.29103637540426164,"score_spread":0.2727702818077684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766300202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010005737,0.004052086,0.000496547,0.018264128,0.003333071,0.0004268687,0.014507157,0.00042105667,0.9574985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008436163,0.0031259726,0.0018943606,0.017408917,0.00048923277,0.00051783264,0.004411108,0.00016831761,0.9635482],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98569643,0.000714367,0.00060514064,0.0009914816,0.009394429,0.002598149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854703,0.0018862489,0.00027501574,0.0014457657,0.00955951,0.0013632482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055789673,0.0017182529,0.0017204169,0.008102463,0.012980457,0.014214218,0.0047080796,0.015014303,0.0886328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021236228,0.0018101997,0.0016960761,0.0082229,0.004198805,0.003079656,0.0031259344,0.010789681,0.038027287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019010267,0.000047988106,0.00024459526,0.00008364351,0.000009109613,0.00005287352,0.00026912458,0.000109879824,0.000101771475,0.10301086,0.8844009,0.011650201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011881118,0.0000044280296,0.0016734861,0.00012699822,0.000011116545,0.00001641007,0.00013598906,0.000074339754,0.00006115639,0.0036891366,0.9941643,0.000030806812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96814764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0886328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06809833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2997477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49409026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767731553","doi":"","title":"User “Safer Harbor” from Statutory Damages: Remixing the DOC’s IP Task Force White Paper","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital USD (University of San Diego)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"SAFER; Task force; Statutory law; Damages; White (mutation); Safe harbor; Task (project management); Law; Computer security; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Public administration","score_opus":0.015331725566986192,"score_gpt":0.23025723253541783,"score_spread":0.21492550696843163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767731553","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0103926975,0.0036105393,0.052662175,0.45543298,0.008209297,0.000500582,0.000219855,0.0006108214,0.46836102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18101232,0.0042321887,0.030932888,0.47430423,0.014332768,0.0012943038,0.00024473717,0.0010117664,0.29263487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9670167,0.011873495,0.001993057,0.0042662537,0.01183293,0.0030175839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9385504,0.047302913,0.001449659,0.004088668,0.007249135,0.0013591001],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049068585,0.0012075182,0.00091256324,0.0020268373,0.010129073,0.025148593,0.005436129,0.05751175,0.010553671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08795118,0.00095632125,0.0019340042,0.0011437665,0.018342787,0.01801612,0.01241158,0.03189772,0.0055834902],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035665584,0.00006829261,0.0004103461,0.00011365988,0.000015130951,0.00077609124,0.0035177164,0.00063952804,0.00060002774,0.69600135,0.27090687,0.026915276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006448516,0.00012673884,0.0005753269,0.00096768426,0.000047361693,0.00026587464,0.0018481105,0.0017819294,0.0017166418,0.13669668,0.8557216,0.00018755884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019790912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025186367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05751175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005749224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020120515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2595026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767915429","doi":"10.54648/joia2017040","title":"<i>Eli Lilly v. Canada</i>: A Patently Clear-Cut Dismissal on the Facts, but Opening the Door for Future Claimants on the Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Arbitration","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Plaintiff; Arbitration; Settlor; Political science; Expropriation; Waiver; Economic Justice; Intellectual property; High Court; Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.033305713577065965,"score_gpt":0.3020814067210422,"score_spread":0.26877569314397626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767915429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024845269,0.006199828,0.0023724285,0.22466369,0.0021049967,0.00016989029,0.0009948061,0.00030999468,0.7383391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26641357,0.004711716,0.0030706674,0.21722892,0.0010727376,0.00011503838,0.0006938944,0.0002103391,0.50648314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920771,0.00034164675,0.00020055033,0.000568834,0.0038162004,0.0029956915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971819,0.0008723924,0.00018427343,0.00013435051,0.00131615,0.00031098886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003185014,0.00056315685,0.00052451313,0.0015620905,0.0135379685,0.02123086,0.003329451,0.0151250865,0.008582053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008259473,0.00056666095,0.0008554795,0.0019839108,0.009113573,0.0032275333,0.0024007873,0.012726625,0.0022933064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005006729,0.000027054599,0.0018366746,0.000097010685,0.000023078981,0.0009150341,0.004313957,0.00020495849,0.001603363,0.55103767,0.4271036,0.012787454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003158851,0.000037841743,0.0051920526,0.0003837931,0.000047674897,0.0002777954,0.004636368,0.0005375501,0.0025082773,0.019847605,0.9663367,0.00016268664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91646606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9657133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08353394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061155677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08960923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44371754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768602159","doi":"","title":"Canada and United States: Campus Sexual Assault Law & Policy Comparative Analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Criminology; Political science; Law; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Sociology; Medical emergency; Medicine","score_opus":0.024927929898942842,"score_gpt":0.314884714665855,"score_spread":0.28995678476691217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768602159","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5892381,0.018796692,0.00067706656,0.016580217,0.0002484746,0.00030616223,0.013006256,0.00007165615,0.36107537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96931654,0.007915885,0.0008019903,0.0027199115,0.000048007478,0.0001336254,0.0036321315,0.000031529235,0.015400357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99368894,0.0008486782,0.00012611046,0.00030260353,0.0025124028,0.0025212055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920133,0.00121382,0.0005953463,0.0001758277,0.0046045333,0.0013972087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022052494,0.0002614295,0.0006579546,0.008807674,0.012176724,0.0062211007,0.0013243008,0.001116981,0.010869632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010823838,0.00024297951,0.00059173175,0.027297102,0.0029625148,0.0015686444,0.0028173043,0.0018028867,0.0005225343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007059702,0.0006425407,0.2982013,0.0011072892,0.00046836527,0.0010019564,0.0238988,0.00511261,0.00054649217,0.36934963,0.15712945,0.14183562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010759995,0.00012979688,0.68024313,0.0010448985,0.00037540568,0.00026141666,0.111007676,0.0019796712,0.0005341043,0.006282406,0.19789803,0.00013587244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99855274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14937873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14937873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18547827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9866001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773753753","doi":"","title":"British Columbia. Court of Appeal","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.013341180375732134,"score_gpt":0.2464097517477036,"score_spread":0.23306857137197146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773753753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003365817,0.0035980714,0.00014773419,0.038385473,0.006593706,0.0006026034,0.017594472,0.0003761207,0.929336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008239338,0.0010043597,0.00012079034,0.019977953,0.00049855415,0.00031140997,0.0018579885,0.00014029747,0.96784925],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965873,0.0001518371,0.00014107146,0.00035553865,0.0012783362,0.0014860275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960752,0.0007334237,0.000089336645,0.0002696195,0.0022415246,0.00059098535],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014151003,0.0019478265,0.0023692665,0.006248231,0.023436854,0.011170702,0.0052787694,0.026331846,0.30831712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008213666,0.0025160464,0.0019662506,0.0054347473,0.0022495922,0.002434271,0.0032556185,0.018301088,0.106738046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076872195,0.0000770028,0.0005674028,0.0000785336,0.00001957686,0.00042184984,0.00014005564,0.0001002221,0.00009190093,0.007959973,0.98023707,0.010229408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010301832,0.000013430082,0.0056500877,0.00034543563,0.000049060774,0.00009178548,0.00056370115,0.00028508526,0.00021344081,0.003175166,0.989428,0.000081744925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9097643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96824396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30831712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038064048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06927324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98660165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773895286","doi":"10.29173/alr1244","title":"Recent Judicial Decisions of Interest to Energy Lawyers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists; Calgary Laboratory Services","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Duty; Insolvency; Law; Judicial opinion; Legislation; Political science; Corporate governance; Common law; Judicial interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Law and economics; Economics; Business; Supreme court","score_opus":0.12436475873453809,"score_gpt":0.3854942446628735,"score_spread":0.2611294859283354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773895286","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028406374,0.32266948,0.003617998,0.4503694,0.0157502,0.0000896108,0.00027582177,0.000116737174,0.17870441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30438134,0.24717517,0.0052761575,0.35329774,0.02133725,0.00012161594,0.00047516896,0.00013936915,0.067796275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851415,0.003514087,0.0011893883,0.0017820301,0.006344805,0.0020281612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95288175,0.03264872,0.0029974016,0.0010775975,0.009518389,0.0008761566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025822813,0.00034298922,0.0005803049,0.0036084326,0.0082053505,0.008398403,0.0032207174,0.013301515,0.0044673705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0531042,0.00093373447,0.0008779053,0.005871698,0.0070104445,0.0042547546,0.0023315682,0.011856233,0.0009520167],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037709247,0.00008532301,0.001241706,0.0009678313,0.000058240585,0.0012481026,0.006705756,0.00082895294,0.0009101173,0.44374853,0.4227937,0.12137412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024830093,0.000024632236,0.0023441352,0.0010966241,0.00005184654,0.0003395524,0.0023895293,0.00026322086,0.0005109499,0.022234514,0.97065914,0.0000611506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061399486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13755442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93860054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014889065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013923346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13656574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774697679","doi":"10.29173/alr1247","title":"The Oil and Gas ROFR: Understanding Current ROFR Issues from the Point of View of the Transactional Lawyer, the Litigator, and In-House Counsel","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Interpretation (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Duty; Insolvency; Law; Point (geometry); Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Business; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.048880586736071305,"score_gpt":0.3296881836334959,"score_spread":0.28080759689742457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774697679","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06789928,0.12625568,0.035041526,0.5590304,0.0014109464,0.00012249568,0.000083904946,0.00011155795,0.21004425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83558553,0.08857291,0.018307902,0.03853124,0.0035788207,0.000149587,0.00008684952,0.000077667195,0.015109516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98904246,0.0052046175,0.000680507,0.0012751502,0.0020007337,0.0017965059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9772535,0.014916476,0.0038290417,0.00077556033,0.0020390805,0.0011863946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020662664,0.0006389304,0.0008759258,0.0047914935,0.010290486,0.030113598,0.005337182,0.023619222,0.0034684632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021376941,0.0009770055,0.00074667303,0.004040147,0.046505738,0.058044262,0.00653267,0.016509026,0.0007189901],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000102552085,0.00006697052,0.0015068374,0.00019021226,0.000004662461,0.0005447685,0.018988738,0.00060492184,0.00018171709,0.9482969,0.0047886213,0.024815343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000087875105,0.00009048735,0.003826017,0.0026468465,0.000018053428,0.0013347575,0.1240636,0.0061311717,0.00041983507,0.6305998,0.23076583,0.00009473304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023317952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03267434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97668207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018195644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020219548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13201928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775084867","doi":"","title":"Canadian Bill of Rights","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bill of rights; Political science; Law; Business; Human rights","score_opus":0.01586531310931771,"score_gpt":0.2709500391023645,"score_spread":0.25508472599304677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775084867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00085042726,0.0021356996,0.0002859793,0.013324829,0.001207426,0.00013375258,0.0034178984,0.000120754405,0.97852325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012439686,0.0018081728,0.0008792905,0.007979231,0.00031062518,0.0001530784,0.0012669943,0.00008607515,0.9750768],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99120927,0.00038246947,0.00022268985,0.00075961865,0.0056590075,0.0017669091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955575,0.00030019938,0.00006256182,0.0003732765,0.0032206355,0.00048587055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024035687,0.0013534081,0.0010261451,0.00568863,0.014643627,0.012777711,0.0027349852,0.009384165,0.10299874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0096977735,0.0010366188,0.0011934794,0.004882942,0.00344737,0.0024676318,0.0024945377,0.007917652,0.019533886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010089916,0.000017046124,0.00017848986,0.00003488204,0.000005880173,0.00004271314,0.00016007756,0.000082995284,0.000060174276,0.31563047,0.67141175,0.012365416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006268084,0.000002665821,0.0006288552,0.000052847707,0.0000055813166,0.000018388464,0.00007483233,0.000055738885,0.000041077885,0.0071730865,0.99192446,0.000016140006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95545703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9728176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10299874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07086394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16771132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5141563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780014199","doi":"","title":"A State in Shackles: The Effect of a Dysfunctional Childhood on Crime and Imprisonment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South Dakota law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Imprisonment; Population; China; State (computer science); Demography; Per capita; Law; Geography; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.01738619952999428,"score_gpt":0.3111859570448523,"score_spread":0.29379975751485804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780014199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93321085,0.011254744,0.00007159161,0.036169447,0.00033991225,0.0000377944,0.0010834273,0.000017912193,0.017814422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99102426,0.0044494956,0.000066230845,0.0012232864,0.00015304188,0.00002479146,0.00031043738,0.000009063864,0.002739491],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985549,0.0006377258,0.000050037488,0.00009426082,0.00017125449,0.0004918026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99195683,0.0015207303,0.002866567,0.00026997266,0.0009193381,0.0024666733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011167533,0.0002293864,0.0002931964,0.0012745885,0.0043706554,0.002861799,0.001101988,0.0014524569,0.01972093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006085489,0.0002419201,0.00064302125,0.0017938688,0.0022375889,0.0018683502,0.0038529253,0.0030411573,0.00066844205],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022661961,0.0005678673,0.941731,0.00013069874,0.00010428136,0.000757221,0.00655089,0.00019902721,0.000043544173,0.0066187386,0.017041814,0.02602845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009792686,0.00008062235,0.9682123,0.00044628937,0.00005474057,0.0003450458,0.02392925,0.00016051476,0.00003598224,0.00086883304,0.0058413837,0.000015215512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21880738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28211406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21880738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056783473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005586875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4350676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782373394","doi":"","title":"Recognition of Canadian same-sex marriage: \"Zappone and Gilligan v. Revenue Commissioners and Others\"","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Research Repository (Kingston University London)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Gender studies; Psychoanalysis; Sociology","score_opus":0.05109892314624952,"score_gpt":0.28226182189928173,"score_spread":0.2311628987530322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782373394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03705483,0.012762857,0.0004603793,0.15130286,0.0019045791,0.00010381562,0.0009678614,0.00006094967,0.7953819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47623473,0.007558936,0.0005534918,0.07605429,0.0004808923,0.00008173232,0.00033032848,0.000049228107,0.43865633],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99549687,0.00033565602,0.000058963455,0.00021393622,0.0015458314,0.0023488032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981123,0.00030739032,0.00007572987,0.00007415161,0.0009691908,0.00046116862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020319885,0.00051462493,0.00040756204,0.0015587846,0.027033094,0.005919366,0.0029757328,0.009023264,0.009387764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005455586,0.0005547707,0.0005978246,0.002521056,0.00641217,0.0016096176,0.0023516146,0.006537859,0.0008748081],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034297125,0.00003509144,0.0027927198,0.000071267474,0.000014752303,0.0005258777,0.016442807,0.00018604507,0.00017944786,0.36564782,0.5958155,0.018254315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003030419,0.000018666791,0.020145668,0.00034859343,0.00007483069,0.00034046566,0.033629235,0.0002539353,0.0005119449,0.013257223,0.93124413,0.00014497456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9937257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07480535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07480535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19409269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54275334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784058903","doi":"","title":"Reigniting the Dialogue: The Latest Use of the Notwithstanding Clause in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0699901260664429,"score_gpt":0.26192259895362685,"score_spread":0.19193247288718396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784058903","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20622797,0.022738013,0.002810747,0.5047338,0.0021271827,0.00013281852,0.0007487887,0.00013880224,0.26034185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8945961,0.0060917716,0.0018220183,0.042011876,0.00032402852,0.000046270314,0.00015138167,0.0001582892,0.054798268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97990555,0.0029086238,0.00043616045,0.0016366643,0.008482324,0.006630612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97122496,0.008608814,0.0008602557,0.00084742275,0.013945941,0.004512602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011203269,0.00041855226,0.0008952535,0.0026488323,0.03608852,0.019166494,0.0046025477,0.008945163,0.0071267853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032969523,0.00060237624,0.00059752614,0.005744631,0.015137331,0.004578569,0.0050818473,0.011677997,0.00032287146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012461694,0.00007265626,0.009788855,0.00028893017,0.00008392365,0.0007341463,0.07748638,0.0010623026,0.00067667273,0.6739374,0.1562344,0.07950968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006796458,0.000052766765,0.031140976,0.0005923235,0.00016641378,0.00014550737,0.062747754,0.0016637214,0.001044383,0.028544711,0.8735303,0.00030311852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9974396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20706165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20706165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.42378852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9196961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784118047","doi":"","title":"The Constitutionality of Restrictions on Recreational Cannabis Advertising: Balancing Public Health and Freedom of Expression","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Advertising; Recreation; Cannabis; Freedom of expression; Public health; First amendment; Political science; Internet privacy; Law; Business; Medicine; Computer science; Psychiatry; Constitution; Human rights","score_opus":0.1462983577840852,"score_gpt":0.3725945129491481,"score_spread":0.22629615516506288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784118047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16542657,0.0033060526,0.008856742,0.0646765,0.0004751757,0.00031942522,0.00037414287,0.00009351359,0.75647193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97027135,0.00093724637,0.0021114144,0.0066439114,0.00027129758,0.00013953156,0.000060586714,0.000022558737,0.019542068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852883,0.003341508,0.0007829169,0.002093887,0.0049527837,0.0035406074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98367554,0.01054458,0.0013528471,0.0014997548,0.002108975,0.00081829424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013553369,0.00042677217,0.00070282316,0.0015136999,0.013929226,0.016951714,0.0026939155,0.0078993095,0.004883475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026673768,0.00091238774,0.0007704947,0.0014474225,0.044979095,0.005839689,0.004394668,0.011152904,0.00064875087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010993647,0.000018286515,0.00042851997,0.000013554878,0.0000035869473,0.00006945795,0.0017390464,0.00010474972,0.0002232424,0.99437875,0.0012505013,0.0017593042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023434394,0.00016765768,0.009877584,0.0007788116,0.00017517887,0.00031830344,0.008789965,0.002213528,0.0051854337,0.7895789,0.18248068,0.00019961536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17259872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1971346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8274013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01906378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03394717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34318817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784904327","doi":"","title":"The Needs of the Many Outweigh the Needs of the Few: A New System of Public Interest Intervention for New Zealand","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Intervention (counseling); Order (exchange); Public interest; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Balance (ability); Law and economics; Fair dealing; Business; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.021583600796285147,"score_gpt":0.27837090622638966,"score_spread":0.25678730543010453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784904327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.345964,0.0042610625,0.047864918,0.16853353,0.0009904013,0.0027583037,0.00017502639,0.000509057,0.42894363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85319394,0.0015953605,0.058802757,0.008134476,0.00022401533,0.0007152849,0.00005037344,0.00014099706,0.0771427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936365,0.0014826925,0.0004409943,0.0010210334,0.0022536216,0.0011651241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951161,0.0011578309,0.00047386254,0.00076484284,0.0010034024,0.001483899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076001743,0.00026639912,0.0004748927,0.00086593145,0.007268611,0.010328031,0.0017193061,0.0034443242,0.007327491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011541143,0.00070045906,0.00061865384,0.0005515313,0.010780544,0.0065653156,0.006152963,0.00508629,0.00056431285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002956843,0.0006061878,0.0148441605,0.0010807858,0.00008930778,0.0035837686,0.043713097,0.0029481906,0.0189771,0.6854223,0.02884733,0.19959216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006988708,0.0009800696,0.06521562,0.0011721819,0.0002394185,0.002856007,0.018912043,0.0093133915,0.0032756682,0.17736988,0.7193587,0.00060817646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2805653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4911565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2805653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019216467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05717266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5578644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787932860","doi":"10.29173/alr1393","title":"Roundabout Justice: A Comment on Danyluk v. Ainsworth Technologies","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Roundabout; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.04574130954311656,"score_gpt":0.3232651807586889,"score_spread":0.2775238712155723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787932860","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009069752,0.0070001786,0.0006593227,0.8866301,0.0074387393,0.00011881586,0.00059753226,0.00016946798,0.08831616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033372518,0.0023754511,0.0006140387,0.9039573,0.0022533291,0.00007543947,0.00014211304,0.00007479859,0.057134982],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98827773,0.0013640675,0.0005320171,0.0014057385,0.0049572424,0.0034631807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9713618,0.019611845,0.00062389986,0.00058878656,0.005751742,0.0020617873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0125943385,0.0009212243,0.0013848171,0.0024320174,0.024896955,0.011454976,0.007161293,0.06921291,0.009862766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03226232,0.0019315447,0.0016906849,0.0037356154,0.008993474,0.004653425,0.0031419727,0.042306777,0.0022407935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059147773,0.00002186951,0.000721029,0.00010029139,0.000027926591,0.0005303464,0.002528449,0.00014108999,0.00029651436,0.050503515,0.939467,0.0056028278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014260966,0.000055457982,0.0078806095,0.0007328707,0.00023152359,0.00025558303,0.005433509,0.00044199466,0.0012408335,0.017090669,0.9662743,0.0002200313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7686608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9109595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23133922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029565122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.076940715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4654032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788021253","doi":"10.11575/prism/29089","title":"Breaker v. Director, Southern Region, Regional Services, Alberta Environment re: Town of Strathmore (11 July 2006) , Appeal No. 05-70-DOP (A.E.A.B)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Geography; Business; Regional science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.024028933741578176,"score_gpt":0.26645950950043196,"score_spread":0.2424305757588538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788021253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020704074,0.007550378,0.0009535319,0.0676757,0.00085942197,0.0001197436,0.0018239255,0.0004814116,0.8998318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.094013855,0.0021506501,0.0006761566,0.030060077,0.00013903137,0.000037018835,0.00053602626,0.00008441933,0.8723028],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991254,0.00005639919,0.000015677686,0.00007159464,0.000398636,0.00033221536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989925,0.0002376496,0.000038161288,0.000030781033,0.00044683175,0.0002541204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009424355,0.0003111001,0.00026790827,0.0007799181,0.011741198,0.003962769,0.0010450707,0.0046173697,0.055483956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024642327,0.0005413928,0.0002542177,0.00071850244,0.0017254502,0.001172894,0.0010107905,0.004352942,0.008380223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050867893,0.000028543065,0.002479796,0.000051517105,0.0000070761585,0.00037908053,0.0012379255,0.00008144154,0.00078334153,0.035675988,0.94221205,0.017012479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037433914,0.000031565378,0.015274194,0.00010045981,0.000027324933,0.00017330707,0.0018627422,0.00020403003,0.0010854477,0.0036708773,0.9774991,0.00003337452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7333726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94118685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26662737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009159521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016891267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5363952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788037232","doi":"10.29173/alr1303","title":"Schmeiser v. Monsamo: A Case Comment","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Philosophy; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.02841218055363319,"score_gpt":0.333660435587362,"score_spread":0.3052482550337288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788037232","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020772649,0.0045979302,0.0007926711,0.7907425,0.0029992152,0.00009722885,0.00032342182,0.0001589895,0.17951523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17644574,0.0029281867,0.0010867494,0.6700623,0.0026445235,0.00007398848,0.00013995681,0.000101667625,0.1465168],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99475634,0.0007166064,0.0001629962,0.0006056702,0.0020596313,0.001698688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878572,0.008381715,0.00036293798,0.00029079153,0.0022462304,0.0008611818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007413431,0.00049975555,0.00062709005,0.001471973,0.014485135,0.0058902255,0.0038826356,0.0291991,0.01126131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022957223,0.0007485628,0.00083249935,0.0020047247,0.0072752303,0.0023669694,0.0025516064,0.01769825,0.0015967619],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013174699,0.000028966984,0.0025913222,0.00014339402,0.000031079588,0.001544704,0.0027604112,0.00024217472,0.0006520422,0.22753271,0.7523561,0.011985226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016616448,0.000074721625,0.011999666,0.0004871347,0.00018408473,0.000862961,0.0054146885,0.000835826,0.0018797317,0.043066654,0.9348395,0.00018892306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5969883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8331962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40301168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013235465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04342853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81077015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789499020","doi":"","title":"Alberta. Legislative Assembly. Select Special Committee on Constitutional Reform. Subcommittee B","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; General assembly; Legislative assembly; Public administration; Law; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.021029736959985685,"score_gpt":0.27277577649858564,"score_spread":0.2517460395386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789499020","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009318588,0.00419452,0.0006234627,0.033411324,0.011044404,0.0013255383,0.026903972,0.0016781737,0.9198867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016163585,0.0008048158,0.00039479343,0.008808184,0.00067202246,0.00027267038,0.003996382,0.00016287497,0.9832719],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99529004,0.0002405529,0.00014988336,0.00043688138,0.0027599481,0.001122634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991803,0.0009245156,0.00015670025,0.00041405953,0.0053152936,0.0013865863],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003908718,0.0012682918,0.001323616,0.004797541,0.007724051,0.0055625187,0.003910527,0.008332787,0.36333287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055057015,0.0015038147,0.0010802848,0.0058491314,0.0014701391,0.0017915503,0.0018382104,0.005885715,0.18364094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012699305,0.000015904712,0.00008209565,0.000044307097,0.0000019456916,0.00001738808,0.000022172477,0.000020167736,0.00010240322,0.0012516612,0.99253196,0.0058974023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016433863,0.000004708578,0.0018710071,0.00005457155,0.000004975892,0.0000049084238,0.00007470942,0.000025608751,0.00008458424,0.00032071795,0.99752754,0.000010357059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7849474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90516853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36333287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019393986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057198115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9081284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790589594","doi":"","title":"Industrial Relations Reform Act: materials prepared for a Continuing Legal Education seminar held in Vancouver, B.C. on September 10, 1987","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Continuing education; Law; Medicine; Medical education","score_opus":0.025098373759158264,"score_gpt":0.29399445870468477,"score_spread":0.2688960849455265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790589594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023268633,0.013259201,0.0010335039,0.093861274,0.00552276,0.0030614717,0.012686132,0.000748211,0.8465589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020647606,0.0015494094,0.00087325583,0.005376232,0.00029031473,0.00032957637,0.001433037,0.000054165743,0.9694465],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992167,0.000061379855,0.000027375478,0.000037491565,0.00037189183,0.00028511893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871063,0.0003362326,0.000037596645,0.000052194835,0.0005851036,0.0002781688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001259897,0.0006078569,0.00051956804,0.0013012915,0.005230265,0.00212107,0.0010585715,0.005595688,0.055669382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025908994,0.0007053531,0.00026062044,0.0015341939,0.00094181433,0.00061898737,0.0006079476,0.0031444002,0.015581462],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003720929,0.000092294606,0.00070004724,0.000092090275,0.0000029039138,0.00012297812,0.0005133927,0.00015480704,0.00034666387,0.0035418135,0.97441745,0.019978197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003170631,0.000031106872,0.019139651,0.00011261261,0.000007130325,0.000023073188,0.0009070255,0.00012346661,0.00037944244,0.0004620508,0.9787622,0.000020424954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.748638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9289171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25136203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014469357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029957712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5056847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791532750","doi":"","title":"Constitutional jurisdiction over health and health care services in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Health care; Health services; Business; Right to health; Political science; Environmental health; Law; Medicine; Population","score_opus":0.010984279257019999,"score_gpt":0.25512025824636503,"score_spread":0.24413597898934503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791532750","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058795065,0.032778155,0.0015696983,0.14471072,0.0015565199,0.00022034277,0.0042319214,0.0002063647,0.75593114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70186657,0.019919802,0.0027980958,0.024253197,0.00048903475,0.0001341455,0.00089672365,0.00014480816,0.24949765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99073243,0.000711638,0.00025632678,0.0005831804,0.003511483,0.0042049675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99106884,0.0022641565,0.00034640369,0.0002380808,0.0038313535,0.0022511855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003447786,0.0005002865,0.0008656609,0.004011474,0.026191995,0.018836226,0.0032947154,0.005482672,0.0138097415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012556834,0.0012013305,0.0006501863,0.009436811,0.013269061,0.0025501132,0.002659822,0.006562521,0.0007172184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026582844,0.000029329774,0.0025057378,0.00012222465,0.000024283236,0.00022601213,0.004465823,0.0010037132,0.00013224651,0.8237799,0.14715816,0.020526074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076689794,0.000026080994,0.032228407,0.00081781537,0.00009694628,0.00015474252,0.0095295785,0.0024340157,0.0003403467,0.067462854,0.8865937,0.00023882386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9992162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6352493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.36475068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.61216015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7367992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791578309","doi":"","title":"Dr. Henry Morgentaler, Dr. Leslie Frank Smoling, Dr. Robert Scott v. Her Majesty the Queen and the Attorney General of Canada = [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Art; Law; Political science; Biology; Zoology","score_opus":0.010364286603522937,"score_gpt":0.2269972760748051,"score_spread":0.21663298947128218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791578309","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014239876,0.050304156,0.00096580567,0.50322276,0.013141679,0.00009437928,0.0015060658,0.00059229834,0.4287489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007821935,0.016080717,0.00039692223,0.05336262,0.001745259,0.0000295235,0.0003766775,0.0001936425,0.91999274],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988292,0.00013335112,0.000026853342,0.00013922411,0.0006489263,0.0002224481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996227,0.00045868123,0.00012509052,0.00006870592,0.001996944,0.0011235644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013677869,0.00047081948,0.00039964757,0.0011334065,0.0061978404,0.0028380353,0.0008417179,0.0027120395,0.15063219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007373377,0.00038475965,0.00025941286,0.0010104877,0.0010579071,0.001953546,0.001072225,0.004805012,0.06295625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003241295,0.0000016951673,0.00011905321,0.000013114407,4.960179e-7,0.000023342489,0.00006366749,0.0000048365214,0.000016234164,0.0009700416,0.9904541,0.008330351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021569556,0.0000031381544,0.00066751096,0.00004895066,0.0000014175776,0.00017993597,0.00031055568,0.000013553135,0.00003731962,0.00035954645,0.9983699,0.000006018769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.276735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5123408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.723265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006927656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013195368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5502485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792826003","doi":"","title":"Privacy and Ethics Canada. Parliament. House of Commons. Standing Committee on Access to Information","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Parliament; House of Representatives; Political science; Commons; Select committee; Internet privacy; Privacy law; Information privacy; Public administration; Law; Business; Privacy policy; Computer science; Legislature; Politics","score_opus":0.0432929380952272,"score_gpt":0.30746690022155654,"score_spread":0.2641739621263293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792826003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00088172004,0.016670324,0.0005620817,0.101534314,0.006085913,0.0002726427,0.028781362,0.00081314816,0.84439856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010293327,0.0060569663,0.00053676177,0.01915449,0.0005799317,0.00015338826,0.0035188175,0.0004107011,0.9592956],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99106395,0.0005208257,0.00025364867,0.00044295625,0.005847857,0.0018707493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884991,0.001731909,0.0003196283,0.00053512614,0.0066653914,0.0022488886],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033343087,0.0013498861,0.0013866178,0.0036550644,0.010685679,0.009052317,0.0030592023,0.0092001725,0.31682125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011557867,0.0014793855,0.000945697,0.010163012,0.0040198294,0.0032894898,0.0026784053,0.008100697,0.10011997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001051157,0.000010363842,0.0000948153,0.00006604723,0.0000025530767,0.000021571983,0.00007118024,0.000028746968,0.000026970507,0.014668521,0.9750171,0.009981702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071132613,0.000002596186,0.00143304,0.00019012445,0.00000508438,0.00001026696,0.00016090642,0.000044966117,0.00005450669,0.0019639772,0.9961112,0.000016189653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9616344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97652084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31682125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05555778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13544826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97447157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792987410","doi":"","title":"&#13;\\n\\tNative American Lands and the Keystone Pipeline Expansion: A Legal Analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MedCrave (MedCrave Group)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Forensic genetics; Forensic nursing; Forensic psychology; Pipeline (software); Forensic odontology; Criminology; Political science; Geography; Forensic science; Law; Sociology; Archaeology; Engineering; Medicine; Biology","score_opus":0.009924086392610946,"score_gpt":0.28953638450182423,"score_spread":0.2796122981092133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792987410","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13672887,0.0072819213,0.0019118423,0.29601344,0.0005780078,0.00008574498,0.00019151834,0.00003488473,0.55717385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8718388,0.0053664036,0.001256471,0.060052518,0.0006270393,0.00012970674,0.00006808554,0.00003301901,0.060627874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99479973,0.0018539418,0.00017164972,0.00037516304,0.0011973619,0.0016021968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99029887,0.0066202437,0.00078389037,0.00019863904,0.0015940248,0.00050433585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005943365,0.00018870729,0.00019540435,0.0020910734,0.019097025,0.010425946,0.0019129297,0.0085894605,0.010514421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011097334,0.00030729096,0.0005045502,0.0028432072,0.014115061,0.0074295895,0.003875192,0.0072591202,0.0006182371],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004779369,0.000021245462,0.0015193652,0.00002225257,0.0000029328116,0.00031434186,0.005522991,0.00010289494,0.00006721572,0.96528494,0.024023874,0.0031130994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034261335,0.00006379548,0.021350052,0.0009721691,0.00008135269,0.00061361847,0.08598128,0.001933131,0.00094947306,0.23678821,0.6511054,0.0001273218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1552832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2537309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8447168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016079267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02314181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30875874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793178950","doi":"","title":"British Columbia Courthouse Library Society.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Library science; Archaeology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.011893988654213842,"score_gpt":0.2308396368792842,"score_spread":0.21894564822507034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793178950","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015839973,0.005950028,0.00019216948,0.014897117,0.0015973398,0.00006432251,0.030790882,0.00049341837,0.94443077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027071948,0.0014249013,0.000115445684,0.00068886974,0.00004145171,0.000011153438,0.0022072967,0.00009253666,0.9927112],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914765,0.00003663689,0.000034979843,0.00012790995,0.00047697214,0.0001757781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997015,0.00020783299,0.00007401981,0.0001457479,0.0019767457,0.00058059965],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046551824,0.000619327,0.0006302005,0.0029648002,0.0069360333,0.006780481,0.0012253772,0.002430781,0.5946016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029893634,0.00055133423,0.0003296121,0.0062577063,0.0008192588,0.0017614706,0.0015174493,0.0021480497,0.21210013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001668893,0.000008759342,0.0004124212,0.00008973887,0.0000023424175,0.00007437698,0.00007804124,0.000023352588,0.0000659603,0.0025004633,0.9590601,0.037667852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022252202,0.0000014585337,0.002128826,0.00009911018,0.0000022422494,0.000024973664,0.00027991526,0.000025613166,0.000052355008,0.00022204507,0.9971535,0.000007608464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89957124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9708303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5946016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017994499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041065644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5782516},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2793204109","doi":"10.29173/alr1410","title":"Exporting Trust: Does E-Commerce Need a Canadian Privacy Seal of Approval","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Merge (version control); Data Protection Act 1998; Personally identifiable information; Consumer protection; Legislature; Business; Privacy policy; The Internet; Internet privacy; Skepticism; Information privacy; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Commerce; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.026224423997142726,"score_gpt":0.30874912102203794,"score_spread":0.28252469702489524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793204109","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06541028,0.011732991,0.0024679126,0.27839264,0.00087319117,0.00014083616,0.00037298104,0.00007919784,0.64053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87267613,0.007347295,0.0019307957,0.050472476,0.0003555891,0.00004415368,0.00021541215,0.00006510174,0.06689316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890477,0.001305613,0.00035617084,0.000817772,0.005362594,0.0031101273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9654394,0.01053344,0.0017776003,0.001467646,0.017729843,0.0030521129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009819994,0.00020740952,0.0005105403,0.0021823612,0.013570994,0.018129298,0.0014342226,0.006952738,0.007703768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0421308,0.00036650273,0.0005738285,0.003482665,0.012680091,0.007902984,0.0018955664,0.005231159,0.0005753699],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044419947,0.000029121424,0.009668528,0.0001641523,0.00001546754,0.00039960648,0.005231481,0.00021147438,0.00030917415,0.8891183,0.06441254,0.030395761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067375746,0.000058052832,0.041135356,0.0006825185,0.00010144127,0.0003431773,0.012689795,0.0008044392,0.00082382385,0.072286546,0.87084675,0.00016067945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95037365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96665704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06563708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06563708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14926028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4762326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793245889","doi":"","title":"The Future of Mandatory Reporting Laws: Developing a Legal and Policy Framework for Determining What Reporting Obligations to Impose on Professionals","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.037156213831801684,"score_gpt":0.3919334695615314,"score_spread":0.35477725572972973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793245889","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013065333,0.012830259,0.09053964,0.47735575,0.0010646309,0.001117479,0.0005402868,0.00032757228,0.40315908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66299504,0.018071845,0.21048822,0.047514435,0.0014461689,0.0017797156,0.00059622276,0.00021036706,0.056897987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95541775,0.017715517,0.0016732359,0.0030603132,0.014428873,0.0077043534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91563964,0.040358946,0.0051039616,0.0043685087,0.02934603,0.0051828423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.087193236,0.001279313,0.0012097043,0.009660395,0.018868167,0.029856777,0.009811929,0.018675063,0.0066100517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0659179,0.0015511881,0.0019044101,0.0063206144,0.05849981,0.023643933,0.0068505937,0.0130506735,0.00093258754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002039842,0.000014097504,0.00027066487,0.000034902143,0.0000023279913,0.000037537135,0.0013182015,0.0006092591,0.00003071239,0.9889286,0.0046033985,0.0041481843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025627674,0.00003171272,0.0021536616,0.0017847503,0.00003761008,0.00008808997,0.010665472,0.007515717,0.0005023767,0.7275652,0.24945575,0.00017393826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82726365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7804351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82726365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14964718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38445282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9862887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793313343","doi":"","title":"Bill C-30: Response to the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in R. v. Shoker Act","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01851392975246272,"score_gpt":0.26933735344206966,"score_spread":0.2508234236896069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793313343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01945292,0.006682721,0.00096147245,0.37973204,0.004824257,0.00034808196,0.0032318532,0.00031130709,0.58445543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0888699,0.0020408835,0.0010992619,0.25260764,0.00065592024,0.00011501541,0.000583933,0.00013942346,0.65388805],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939594,0.00030701942,0.0001286983,0.0003026755,0.0032149826,0.002087292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99695385,0.0005501253,0.000076076765,0.000063344974,0.0017947587,0.00056175556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023008992,0.00064521807,0.00043345336,0.0013798099,0.018319067,0.0060470034,0.0026900892,0.01927422,0.014217619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076733325,0.00067451823,0.000853804,0.0014065948,0.003947139,0.0011129249,0.0015205302,0.011947181,0.0035195632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021293246,0.00001814659,0.0006654927,0.000027359982,0.0000057583816,0.00028867697,0.0010736191,0.000118690376,0.00031810085,0.046788264,0.9463311,0.004343431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003431191,0.000020498504,0.009465347,0.0001307047,0.000027073462,0.00012959198,0.0023157601,0.00033992418,0.00082089077,0.00531652,0.981313,0.000086416076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9755587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059859276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059859276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13170971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43431145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793575832","doi":"10.11575/prism/33989","title":"Whatever Happened To ... Roncarelli v. Duplessis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.017404904786310144,"score_gpt":0.23950198193727348,"score_spread":0.22209707715096333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793575832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050903983,0.01096004,0.0018195708,0.3617119,0.0025149896,0.0001065864,0.00022152865,0.000098407705,0.571663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6650194,0.004664435,0.00091577816,0.1611087,0.0013658177,0.000075334996,0.00010087024,0.00008359263,0.16666603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935788,0.0008749782,0.00011475316,0.0011125372,0.001955659,0.0023632783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820495,0.00061874493,0.00019111641,0.00008795023,0.0006380939,0.00025920194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004189127,0.0003871929,0.0004280552,0.0010548724,0.022688674,0.010503568,0.0020568655,0.012697612,0.0068725958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008896866,0.0004839579,0.00052655034,0.0011066541,0.01645536,0.0047762147,0.0030714995,0.015078816,0.00092941424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022136006,0.00001118829,0.0010346273,0.000042053773,0.000008040797,0.0005941467,0.0076391906,0.000078836994,0.00032376352,0.924122,0.05732833,0.008795717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031484655,0.000056936366,0.004739945,0.00039379514,0.000056092686,0.0004002302,0.014522915,0.00029067483,0.0027339142,0.07149806,0.9051379,0.00013798621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6932659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70581114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30673409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035268735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019689828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.617081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793845714","doi":"","title":"Provincial Judges' Association of British Columbia. Conference","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Political science; History; Psychology","score_opus":0.008456671860181576,"score_gpt":0.20935247317022854,"score_spread":0.20089580131004697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793845714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004482947,0.0064617046,0.00025066422,0.044316173,0.0148950815,0.00021178415,0.012810621,0.00036147423,0.9162096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00484913,0.00060437806,0.00009847514,0.0013218771,0.00018778373,0.00002897492,0.000954832,0.0000434345,0.9919111],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983626,0.00008843803,0.000050257146,0.00016312818,0.00073876255,0.00059684255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973201,0.00013509265,0.000052713483,0.00010428853,0.0018179164,0.0005698717],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011783403,0.00073970546,0.00046729797,0.0022878926,0.009141406,0.005524691,0.0015591697,0.003847095,0.3160108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029975977,0.00069051184,0.0005140405,0.0023866678,0.0008142328,0.00085748883,0.0016842763,0.0036975576,0.06949719],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022617478,0.000012440069,0.00038696526,0.00003641356,0.0000023302484,0.000041934578,0.00005334758,0.000035306963,0.000057034445,0.0015687174,0.9832788,0.014504143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007374453,0.0000024771648,0.002555393,0.000042483938,0.000003181771,0.000010726902,0.00020671588,0.00006178012,0.000053157826,0.00021045252,0.99683976,0.0000065220615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.873226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9655187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3160108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020751063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049286786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9756276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795930076","doi":"","title":"Canada Update: Pursuing Just Desserts: The Supreme Court of Canada Clarifies Damage Awards from Charter Breaches","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.039861434050896954,"score_gpt":0.23718386133171715,"score_spread":0.1973224272808202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795930076","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01133974,0.021288073,0.0016785207,0.56802535,0.015654324,0.00030214668,0.010846623,0.001111118,0.36975405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16956414,0.03292641,0.009037185,0.3478162,0.0057102693,0.00020210295,0.00832784,0.0010259128,0.42538995],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879776,0.00064022257,0.00060773676,0.000532937,0.008193363,0.0020481122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9636811,0.005905469,0.00073678436,0.0011110357,0.024488034,0.0040775137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00732671,0.00065388443,0.00074209896,0.0041906806,0.016934844,0.014525938,0.004058551,0.013008406,0.019725295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033435654,0.0009881303,0.00064821943,0.0046017594,0.004035997,0.0038453282,0.003629125,0.00990645,0.0030803988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000103103475,0.00001260552,0.0011110946,0.000041303658,0.0000074496297,0.00015255976,0.00044386054,0.00008292917,0.0000720172,0.010060926,0.9749144,0.013090672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014481509,0.000007075516,0.0046041855,0.00019140376,0.000024452995,0.00007236993,0.00086122495,0.0001777027,0.0001541395,0.0021443872,0.99168384,0.000064757565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98356485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9963644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069396935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.069396935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23625478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5035124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796141458","doi":"","title":"Canada Update: A New Framework for Determining Jurisdiction, the Application of the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens, and Limitations of the Solicitor-Client Privilege","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Doctrine; Jurisdiction; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02582153148283101,"score_gpt":0.2684698756026286,"score_spread":0.24264834411979758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796141458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018687084,0.0152865965,0.033190545,0.2900425,0.010444737,0.0024224217,0.05572163,0.0030828814,0.57112163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16782184,0.012375722,0.20322545,0.13703446,0.0023138567,0.0019001503,0.024709832,0.0018859744,0.44873264],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9602041,0.0027210733,0.0027889907,0.0018959631,0.02814671,0.004243215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9160152,0.008986174,0.0016497134,0.0027139194,0.06486831,0.0057665887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015790999,0.0010905457,0.0016404557,0.011225671,0.014332529,0.019435855,0.010132984,0.0108733745,0.015136286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052036487,0.0018963143,0.0025212108,0.010555558,0.005624049,0.005634995,0.0050832797,0.010499619,0.003204152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000417711,0.000039560306,0.0038328466,0.00022720985,0.000043325028,0.0001770184,0.0014273542,0.0008023433,0.00022827082,0.11081941,0.84797835,0.034382597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043956083,0.000014686029,0.010817962,0.0005852361,0.00012193675,0.00011720259,0.0010466151,0.00090111856,0.0005433199,0.008867425,0.9767611,0.00017932279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9940851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13230479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13230479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.46408463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95994294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2798095494","doi":"10.29173/alr1347","title":"Health Care Reform and the Law in Canada: Meeting the Challenge, Timothy A. Caulfield &amp; Barbara von Tigerstrom, eds. (Edmonton: University of alberta Press, 2002)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.015242604907607161,"score_gpt":0.2488093476599681,"score_spread":0.23356674275236095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2798095494","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020368712,0.25567287,0.0005712162,0.6935081,0.0016589052,0.000026001615,0.00025597704,0.000036976227,0.046233136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2201706,0.54159045,0.0040509934,0.15085295,0.0058409455,0.00008864501,0.0005105397,0.00010050812,0.07679442],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930704,0.0010560281,0.00013501027,0.00027091394,0.0033414203,0.0021263063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99092734,0.0023138141,0.00032282056,0.00016979277,0.0038498067,0.0024163967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061110025,0.0006442321,0.0006704396,0.0036325715,0.015753811,0.014759784,0.0027254827,0.011876276,0.006467168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015536945,0.0006350436,0.0005824521,0.0070273336,0.02144484,0.0048844903,0.0030206565,0.006798272,0.0006927196],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012614715,0.000025048796,0.0012270792,0.00021628645,0.000018282833,0.0001290257,0.0022613695,0.00055039395,0.000059865237,0.20967142,0.74313045,0.042698044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033336026,0.000014366636,0.012622576,0.0015722134,0.000052268577,0.00012413165,0.011163062,0.00067623507,0.00015293095,0.09510434,0.87840647,0.000078035926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9875213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15914616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15914616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38789657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9752713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802442146","doi":"","title":"Food as a Dangerous Product: The Promise of Private Law for Public Health","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"St. Jude Medical; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Fraser Health Authority","keywords":"Public health; Business; Product (mathematics); Law; Public health law; Environmental health; Political science; Medicine; Health care; Health policy; Public health policy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.047940402726698965,"score_gpt":0.3181412321099093,"score_spread":0.27020082938321033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802442146","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009083978,0.010583428,0.008824579,0.70403314,0.0010238286,0.00007191831,0.000116437404,0.00008224451,0.2661805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63948613,0.017691463,0.01115726,0.23032184,0.0033939148,0.00021130213,0.00021090856,0.000117991236,0.0974092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98605794,0.0038878075,0.00028228902,0.0013448684,0.006123997,0.002303138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97552437,0.013890545,0.0012930826,0.0024666432,0.004093428,0.0027319635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016814735,0.00060483563,0.00073863333,0.001597656,0.014502155,0.020699993,0.0028415772,0.024581775,0.010400204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024304673,0.0005842324,0.0010053786,0.0012086275,0.04273351,0.015055501,0.007454883,0.012181831,0.0013800767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013313858,0.000032494932,0.0004800389,0.000051074243,0.000007606503,0.000112333066,0.0012569458,0.000257247,0.00014279022,0.9558576,0.024706809,0.017081685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036397287,0.000055043023,0.0013671619,0.0005234485,0.000033436136,0.00013822252,0.0030454157,0.0012943324,0.00035120343,0.61297697,0.3801194,0.00005896942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2843803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33640736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2843803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03295908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08463816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804163518","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3259","title":"Residual Discretion: The Concept of Forum of Necessity under the Court Jurisdiction and Proceedings Transfer Act","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Plaintiff; Law; Discretion; Competence (human resources); Statute; Inherent powers; Political science; Exclusive jurisdiction; Scope (computer science); Personal jurisdiction; Constitution; Economics; Computer science; Management","score_opus":0.016132068405202284,"score_gpt":0.28193297070808054,"score_spread":0.2658009023028783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804163518","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10971245,0.0021161616,0.21240781,0.014832407,0.0004830025,0.0006296387,0.0003430885,0.00024831205,0.65922713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9597871,0.00036123145,0.021374749,0.001102523,0.0002376812,0.0005267606,0.000104159044,0.000042767253,0.016463129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9775522,0.009245418,0.0018388691,0.0027117333,0.0064724237,0.0021793526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722038,0.017841673,0.0022279646,0.003929931,0.0021726221,0.0016239802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018752508,0.00034995633,0.0006374846,0.0037515156,0.0054454594,0.010985653,0.0030652303,0.0063451026,0.0048817745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043493193,0.00051546784,0.00089660607,0.0020991936,0.03138004,0.011357382,0.0064370013,0.0061810333,0.00072598644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060249004,0.000005693929,0.00011689274,0.000009425532,0.0000016542331,0.000038030783,0.0015916291,0.00010284874,0.00014104435,0.99580115,0.00027338538,0.0019122488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045295714,0.000057792284,0.0009950647,0.00018543527,0.000022350418,0.00024036114,0.0013577226,0.001345458,0.00040874447,0.94703233,0.04825419,0.00005526861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007507795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006144952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018752508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004617679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013691519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0991739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W28212462","doi":"10.1111/gcb.13667","title":"Hardship and the Granting of Zoning Variances: A New Test in Light of Rousseau v. Zoning Board of Appeals , 17 Neb. App. 469, 764 N.W.2d 130 (2009)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nebraska law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Zoning; Test (biology); Law; Psychology; Political science; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.036507085924172546,"score_gpt":0.28705960188110174,"score_spread":0.2505525159569292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W28212462","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053551276,0.013429573,0.0020692733,0.83007616,0.011583409,0.00006977453,0.00018334606,0.00011532996,0.13711792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15612859,0.0073054275,0.004215548,0.67792463,0.0125324335,0.00046146326,0.00017288771,0.00031462876,0.14094442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881058,0.0029724117,0.00059920404,0.0023022606,0.0037474602,0.0022729223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98894906,0.0066576297,0.00038781107,0.00073570525,0.0021620197,0.0011077017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018584384,0.0009249128,0.0011529147,0.0012539625,0.016622616,0.016209835,0.0043191807,0.030243019,0.023481522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035865285,0.0007416741,0.0014457295,0.0011523053,0.019997468,0.015715742,0.008126984,0.032363813,0.002746102],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004924641,0.000047126156,0.0010769091,0.00004341879,0.000020188147,0.00017182916,0.0015565759,0.00013603349,0.00014386373,0.48970103,0.48644793,0.020605922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008894187,0.00006308283,0.0025099986,0.0003676728,0.000033720426,0.00009904182,0.002352482,0.00036123508,0.0001373378,0.076990165,0.91688836,0.00010791113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13308714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18897781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13308714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008731258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016142903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.264625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885134652","doi":"10.5195/lawreview.2018.566","title":"The Hidden History of Northern Civil Rights Law and the Villainous Supreme Court, 1875-1915","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Pittsburgh Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Criminal Justice Association","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Civil rights; Political science","score_opus":0.01383021113524075,"score_gpt":0.22448203352422996,"score_spread":0.21065182238898922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885134652","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3148837,0.014552536,0.0011783027,0.017145334,0.00024374496,0.000034288765,0.00029671582,0.000025527193,0.6516398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97144216,0.0017186736,0.0002122571,0.0013392412,0.00012224149,0.0000143030475,0.000057540554,0.000013107877,0.025080446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984378,0.00051521807,0.000037137783,0.00025412103,0.00029376877,0.0004619499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985506,0.0008393471,0.00017857656,0.000086938766,0.0001852023,0.00015934951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022892142,0.00019283385,0.00035812205,0.0017468443,0.006923003,0.0043531875,0.000599563,0.0020652756,0.006053837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007762872,0.0003561555,0.00020694727,0.0018234288,0.02145162,0.004028481,0.003052205,0.0032672798,0.00035134633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039196995,0.00002362566,0.0031242985,0.000038902974,0.0000096728345,0.00031945482,0.022005208,0.00042200982,0.00010933316,0.9577844,0.006014615,0.010109283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003923634,0.000108330874,0.07989455,0.0015501603,0.00004791226,0.00051321415,0.02066645,0.0009764304,0.0009504074,0.21781065,0.6773546,0.00008816465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33113086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5162256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33113086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027633915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010455437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.658407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886144973","doi":"10.29173/alr1448","title":"Case Comment on R. v. Marshall","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.03618848562604948,"score_gpt":0.3229803431907318,"score_spread":0.28679185756468234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886144973","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039841416,0.0037389747,0.00033593565,0.89299333,0.0077766483,0.000107744505,0.00049389474,0.00014487274,0.090424515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029586844,0.001894807,0.00039332235,0.8536588,0.0043530194,0.00009286193,0.000092816954,0.000111588204,0.10981587],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99421954,0.00043045366,0.00021071442,0.0008524507,0.002869126,0.0014177485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968086,0.001270378,0.00016963333,0.00012747513,0.0011204047,0.00050338695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028723394,0.0008475613,0.0011845265,0.0013830931,0.012487271,0.0040433086,0.0049700253,0.03182457,0.013345212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013935287,0.00085430813,0.0019228433,0.0015086232,0.004202158,0.0019193526,0.0021602313,0.026315633,0.004453948],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005364161,0.00001592511,0.0004932431,0.000051990784,0.000016824166,0.00092801807,0.0010173358,0.00010317853,0.00038071748,0.036761876,0.95602185,0.004155322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004840585,0.000030201898,0.0019855322,0.00026126465,0.00006857907,0.00039758283,0.0014384795,0.00019901077,0.0006246588,0.0075981533,0.9872404,0.00010776272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73146963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8014423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26853037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021580962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03197319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5402236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886965970","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Legal Research Guide: Prince Edward Island","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; History; Geography; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.06726609954820885,"score_gpt":0.35776436375410897,"score_spread":0.29049826420590014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886965970","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011310807,0.0060030296,0.0027885935,0.0049274955,0.00092003925,0.00081281847,0.08666874,0.0025648968,0.8941833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016627928,0.0045005684,0.0044833194,0.0004029296,0.00004917238,0.00030191048,0.015570742,0.0007762362,0.97225225],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724954,0.00020523477,0.00024169446,0.00018975086,0.0017784395,0.00033530235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779222,0.0022146031,0.00032433396,0.0007627309,0.017933626,0.0008426063],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036164564,0.0019171222,0.0016627746,0.01235694,0.009793009,0.009224763,0.0027132148,0.00228947,0.36370713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014855043,0.0023020883,0.0010803265,0.027060576,0.001984469,0.0057556117,0.0021130322,0.003128802,0.16266014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000085303545,0.000010951082,0.00017255364,0.00014735878,0.000001811108,0.000012499982,0.0001672744,0.000099844205,0.000023024337,0.002667146,0.9625304,0.03415855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059080544,0.00000408624,0.0024459462,0.00032317112,0.000007327381,0.0000189795,0.000537554,0.00011916385,0.000113408685,0.0008305659,0.9955707,0.000023266788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94467837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98391867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36370713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036290247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12437603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90759456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888642844","doi":"","title":"Forum [Invited Papers]: FORWARD TO THE PAST: The 2005 CASW Code of Ethics","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social work review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Code (set theory); Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Programming language; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.033162741697677835,"score_gpt":0.3149727705498449,"score_spread":0.28181002885216705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888642844","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012566249,0.01065368,0.0014261225,0.8247278,0.11158159,0.00055910804,0.0014407194,0.00023776005,0.04811672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038505383,0.0071830708,0.0058922386,0.57553065,0.045532666,0.0017363564,0.00158649,0.00069182884,0.3233413],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96833235,0.005699354,0.0018944003,0.001864409,0.016688198,0.0055212984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93249786,0.016374845,0.0029405286,0.0026764716,0.036074787,0.009435465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03233523,0.0013199942,0.0018091783,0.006723387,0.016802102,0.021425981,0.005681084,0.04722709,0.021096408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09899298,0.0011908063,0.0022193685,0.004920853,0.0075431773,0.0068557407,0.0043183607,0.023838878,0.007099826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000116627,0.000008750325,0.00007616917,0.00007079897,0.0000035386252,0.00003360298,0.00022496453,0.000026123096,0.00005622885,0.01638087,0.9801813,0.0029260975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002099383,0.0000074431537,0.00088879024,0.0003555805,0.000010355056,0.000014383262,0.00042902958,0.000076366174,0.0000866962,0.0040064086,0.9940528,0.00005120977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53960115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6848302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53960115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04311418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17315976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9262205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889948538","doi":"","title":"Same-sex marriage in Canada: The impact of legal marriage on the first cohort of gay and lesbian Canadians to wed.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ePrints Soton (University of Southampton)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Same sex; Gender studies; Homosexuality; Psychology; Cohort; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.01045308544132911,"score_gpt":0.22436262443193655,"score_spread":0.21390953899060744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889948538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99381965,0.000994432,0.000030150237,0.0016044925,0.00003300271,0.00004932645,0.00044218326,0.0000040155905,0.0030226822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99556315,0.0012580049,0.000064309956,0.00048539927,0.000008472039,0.000019160707,0.0003216341,0.000004170022,0.00227583],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998776,0.00011460876,0.000027131926,0.00008544791,0.00037012002,0.0006265675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779725,0.00008295056,0.00030400298,0.00003553469,0.00059085025,0.0011894404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009794487,0.0003195111,0.00037174602,0.0013647972,0.014626394,0.002499889,0.0012147536,0.0008524842,0.0030049288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025134746,0.00038600434,0.00050133385,0.0031417576,0.0016427869,0.0007606815,0.0024114868,0.0018867331,0.00020826641],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018360873,0.00030674398,0.85132486,0.00009549326,0.000051099432,0.00097655127,0.11226497,0.00007806973,0.0005326461,0.0012257795,0.0054393406,0.027520886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012502537,0.00009463525,0.820228,0.00009224576,0.000021584861,0.00023876377,0.17249474,0.00015431237,0.0000887134,0.000094266936,0.0064381654,0.00004208639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99879223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043158792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043158792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06121915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3131404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890043845","doi":"10.11575/prism/32768","title":"An Evaluation of the Cost of Family Law Disputes: Measuring the Cost Implication of Various Dispute Resolution Methods","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.07189602198828637,"score_gpt":0.3458588539410936,"score_spread":0.27396283195280724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890043845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97881067,0.0012779111,0.005259553,0.0009825749,0.000046442285,0.0009314293,0.00015691428,0.000022189604,0.012512308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892287,0.00052455475,0.008729554,0.00011681912,0.000051860374,0.0004421402,0.00008787948,0.00001129833,0.0008071831],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.89508677,0.06451837,0.007133058,0.0013967728,0.030176906,0.0016881572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4319279,0.47012165,0.05674398,0.007962279,0.029452344,0.0037918477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053854357,0.00042831685,0.0005801202,0.006591523,0.0021837915,0.003130193,0.0016859247,0.0011403543,0.004121813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2922551,0.00044009375,0.0008306021,0.0034651603,0.0019854836,0.003986312,0.0023569502,0.0012783428,0.00024207054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021436221,0.0031029088,0.60799485,0.0013568195,0.0005266166,0.00060852815,0.015537599,0.004039867,0.0019662383,0.0068837036,0.0015059091,0.35433337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003243537,0.0055751777,0.9063642,0.00095096393,0.00045535984,0.0015196403,0.044334065,0.017267823,0.003632307,0.0058061755,0.013535608,0.00023438553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034574512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054843514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053854357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057685548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003045228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2848125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893792851","doi":"10.5703/1288284316712","title":"The Long Arm of the Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Purdue Pharma (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.018408331854230887,"score_gpt":0.3025642271002901,"score_spread":0.28415589524605916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893792851","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014306188,0.032091487,0.025239473,0.59166974,0.0072936555,0.00005509395,0.00049418525,0.00017215374,0.32867807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61680305,0.014524165,0.010619737,0.15293503,0.02008184,0.00022741812,0.0003009518,0.00013185495,0.18437587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997926,0.00071669987,0.00007432452,0.00056158256,0.0005191249,0.00020225186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99439186,0.003098982,0.00038684224,0.00071719487,0.0010442868,0.00036078904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00274757,0.00035750054,0.0005123968,0.0010381063,0.0033654273,0.009257808,0.0011015713,0.008934141,0.020834537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009827674,0.00021817924,0.00031782617,0.0012426996,0.012278536,0.013846788,0.0022684722,0.0070089204,0.004258886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001140598,0.000006093466,0.00017320429,0.000029132245,0.0000038006247,0.000020468302,0.00024209579,0.000045179204,0.00006514734,0.9714317,0.021490773,0.0064809206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013337613,0.000011339259,0.0006080143,0.000121527315,0.000004192726,0.000044986213,0.00040808468,0.00029194955,0.00008301365,0.8716982,0.12669834,0.000017004266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054406836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004509833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020834537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027005754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021342624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06969845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894481999","doi":"","title":"Devalued Liberty and Undue Deference: The Tort of False Imprisonment and the Law of Solitary Confinement","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Law Foundation of British Columbia","keywords":"Tort; Law; Deference; Plaintiff; Political science; Dignity; Imprisonment; Prison; Supreme court; Liability","score_opus":0.01757136329170218,"score_gpt":0.2777668288321548,"score_spread":0.26019546554045264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894481999","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38659593,0.011927418,0.01694746,0.10533982,0.00076571765,0.00007493817,0.00011409589,0.00009990504,0.47813478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804863,0.0012714803,0.00076135935,0.0030851143,0.00009802954,0.000017473561,0.000009388195,0.000012625525,0.014258215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958983,0.0011334652,0.0000946122,0.0002961354,0.0010955355,0.0014818906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967158,0.0012913051,0.00040565498,0.0003327557,0.00076632225,0.00048819117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032980198,0.00037273133,0.00030416116,0.0009173983,0.0153541565,0.006917599,0.0017297255,0.0050793043,0.002996146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007954583,0.00033223856,0.00068435393,0.00065517816,0.033342216,0.0034403298,0.0044337567,0.0040934333,0.00024485672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028428847,0.000015720065,0.0025282705,0.00003107629,0.0000088359875,0.00085496565,0.019360721,0.0006366764,0.0001777076,0.9610627,0.0059705838,0.009324243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006592913,0.000201818,0.039965644,0.0017447213,0.00020512955,0.0026775429,0.08108508,0.007878957,0.0011679906,0.54580665,0.31877372,0.00042676614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7317278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7600955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7317278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030383792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025381194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5397042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894919336","doi":"10.11575/prism/33992","title":"Whatever Happened to ... R. v. Sault Ste. Marie: the Due Diligence Defence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Due diligence; Forensic engineering; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.012373272219103584,"score_gpt":0.2188905559664028,"score_spread":0.20651728374729922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894919336","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03475574,0.005561447,0.0016174134,0.7539055,0.0031551234,0.00008183775,0.00013100992,0.000056426783,0.20073561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5086026,0.0032796005,0.001394104,0.2886236,0.0012758726,0.00004792002,0.000053940905,0.00009465695,0.1966277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98634547,0.0017100674,0.00039120766,0.0018210908,0.005324662,0.0044074226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913523,0.0024803015,0.00056991115,0.00025634436,0.004099453,0.0012417308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007980558,0.00036833936,0.0005202514,0.00062528206,0.0219535,0.008337154,0.0027121583,0.028311528,0.004499627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02692817,0.00056843826,0.0008609466,0.00079033687,0.0125989225,0.00300438,0.002851707,0.021181855,0.0008703177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052282612,0.000032031698,0.004369263,0.00010930885,0.000047671823,0.0023949249,0.020503426,0.00040616654,0.0013428297,0.71875584,0.23540188,0.016584417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044993514,0.00008340432,0.0072596427,0.00052123994,0.00008924711,0.0009216881,0.01423822,0.0006581112,0.0017305253,0.045281433,0.9288166,0.00035500134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8882666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9209945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11173338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04074519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06470542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29562843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898703881","doi":"","title":"Guides de recherche · Research guides: Droits de la personne au Canada: Législation","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.37468108746925405,"score_gpt":0.47206012185029744,"score_spread":0.0973790343810434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898703881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056253397,0.052386947,0.0050341324,0.07353318,0.0058722184,0.0012950249,0.06510245,0.0024431122,0.7887077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021186233,0.027415518,0.0062511577,0.004275002,0.00046440974,0.00065791304,0.011803616,0.000841188,0.92710495],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836939,0.0015179656,0.0008589807,0.0011876078,0.0110802045,0.00166135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9565639,0.0079812305,0.0010680662,0.002017087,0.030379785,0.0019900226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009370601,0.0015342268,0.0021167113,0.010548358,0.012939874,0.020909017,0.0036062698,0.008116655,0.21827044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03634836,0.0018191116,0.0011125018,0.021080922,0.004885867,0.006079838,0.002311645,0.0068437327,0.039158426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028776767,0.000051783314,0.00070097245,0.00045127203,0.000011463661,0.00005797405,0.0010701696,0.00029122687,0.00017158038,0.04122208,0.90368676,0.052255925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021194963,0.0000120666255,0.0042226096,0.0009910748,0.00001721292,0.000029278044,0.0012677672,0.0002677781,0.00032429962,0.003052047,0.98974985,0.00004475371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98112833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9808133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21827044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.115462266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31273085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8377413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900409787","doi":"","title":"Testing the Jurisdictional Waters: The Provincial Regulation of Interprovincial Pipelines","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Federalism; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Political science; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Constitution; Law; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.015678449520153962,"score_gpt":0.2738930200858683,"score_spread":0.25821457056571434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900409787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3684413,0.0033143624,0.017460333,0.06745739,0.00026234135,0.00013716755,0.00037527306,0.00013220368,0.5424196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98137695,0.0004239687,0.0012329606,0.002434399,0.000022261833,0.000017260423,0.000033368335,0.000014587738,0.014444308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927642,0.0010207024,0.00019167368,0.00080259313,0.0028033028,0.0024175849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99265987,0.0027287458,0.0004260924,0.00042986756,0.0030982152,0.0006572211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005143272,0.00015465627,0.00026745806,0.0010614085,0.02035507,0.008930279,0.001963621,0.0025500862,0.0033335453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012279086,0.0003945489,0.000321699,0.0018947726,0.019405453,0.0022792155,0.0033856619,0.004883487,0.00020032113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020528489,0.0000106942525,0.0058083907,0.000039161176,0.000010954438,0.00023004341,0.016074955,0.0009906889,0.00053793367,0.9572606,0.006651254,0.012364654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010308623,0.000106277424,0.06924808,0.0006689139,0.00018834451,0.00032691137,0.07575705,0.0069880644,0.003915213,0.26280063,0.57956773,0.00032968313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96180296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9797482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9367453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06325472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12495412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4589473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901817107","doi":"","title":"Distilling Duty: The Supreme Court of Canada Amends Anns","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Duty; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.09904062580052556,"score_gpt":0.30247117218939124,"score_spread":0.20343054638886568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901817107","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12827434,0.005107759,0.0015111746,0.46501803,0.0035377748,0.00026210237,0.0007616045,0.00012646502,0.39540073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5488455,0.0017621749,0.0015788096,0.16966337,0.0009313516,0.00011949386,0.00016656806,0.0001471793,0.2767855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.981585,0.0016897584,0.00041491134,0.0017933788,0.0054609673,0.00905594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829274,0.0057168123,0.00037845437,0.00054652576,0.006339692,0.004091121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011332272,0.00069590297,0.0012955428,0.0019070322,0.05751907,0.021615403,0.005752829,0.038619623,0.012122568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04243447,0.0014593377,0.0011070784,0.0024551817,0.012667293,0.0046030744,0.00555171,0.032571707,0.0012108779],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014314277,0.000091986054,0.0052593937,0.000055484612,0.00009009821,0.0014100804,0.01496828,0.0012610675,0.0005738054,0.58635867,0.3738902,0.015897704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018484141,0.00006794639,0.012952755,0.0004343871,0.00024225612,0.0002135934,0.022965735,0.002932924,0.0012380214,0.08771136,0.8705691,0.00048700336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98644173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13240798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13240798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25069162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96069163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903030359","doi":"","title":"“Revenge Porn”, Tort Law, and Changing Socio-Technological Realities: A Commentary on Doe 464533 v ND","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of law and technology","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Liability","score_opus":0.02352344111494002,"score_gpt":0.2844934128313727,"score_spread":0.26096997171643266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903030359","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016239985,0.008097861,0.00029279015,0.9700097,0.004570571,0.000011817348,0.00009719875,0.000011995434,0.015284052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047895763,0.0051900563,0.0006546271,0.9155751,0.010224585,0.000092062866,0.00004227606,0.00006155127,0.020263977],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887699,0.0035354693,0.0009157192,0.0024121604,0.002627999,0.0017386588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95911336,0.035446428,0.00091854023,0.0007141367,0.0028690002,0.0009384168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0131619815,0.000905224,0.0016101075,0.0016182145,0.016076514,0.011346631,0.007522387,0.121529154,0.0056916736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038167402,0.0010522096,0.0020300883,0.002233186,0.0325082,0.01316322,0.005843015,0.06230247,0.0011655139],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048765683,0.000033841847,0.00036928995,0.00020549144,0.000029971869,0.0005019331,0.0116320085,0.00015008073,0.00018790316,0.429549,0.5514964,0.0057953317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006789512,0.000025822555,0.0013350385,0.0014637442,0.00007961936,0.00024905396,0.01328039,0.00027196822,0.00043150818,0.11083974,0.8718232,0.00013197547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25803843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4532122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7419616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019577643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026703544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51307297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903346198","doi":"10.29173/alr2510","title":"Sober Second Thoughts: Litigating Purchase and Sale Agreements in the Energy Industry","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"ConocoPhillips (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Closing (real estate); Compromise; Subject matter; Business; Energy (signal processing); Law; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Economics; Political science; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.026319566844816164,"score_gpt":0.3235116577494944,"score_spread":0.29719209090467824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903346198","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108651266,0.04525582,0.029167214,0.30772123,0.0027742644,0.0002105264,0.000094845855,0.0001070637,0.50601786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8846245,0.009652513,0.00524205,0.042413656,0.0012629715,0.000103016995,0.00003441022,0.00006745191,0.056599546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.988552,0.005287702,0.00045560653,0.00082677015,0.0031613435,0.0017166549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97717035,0.019754995,0.0008327448,0.00046956932,0.0014719125,0.00030032237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015594683,0.00034224155,0.0006118337,0.0023773513,0.0099827405,0.010603274,0.0019971442,0.019777983,0.0072972975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024063807,0.0005208126,0.00089696114,0.0016738256,0.021391984,0.010044808,0.0053617903,0.012682879,0.0006276665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008818041,0.000015879394,0.00022758474,0.00004147904,0.0000070127244,0.0004898127,0.0076330574,0.00022631018,0.00012491779,0.97759205,0.008402475,0.0052305995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055060504,0.000046999146,0.0013663947,0.0005678711,0.00003344331,0.0006248173,0.019876063,0.0014603669,0.0007168274,0.73758274,0.23759104,0.000078324476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035055805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040952064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035055805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007084048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008649304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08247352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903681867","doi":"10.29173/alr2511","title":"Recent Judicial Decisions of Interest to Energy Lawyers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Calgary Laboratory Services","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Judicial opinion; Insolvency; Law; Bankruptcy; Legislation; Arbitration; Creditor; Business; Economics; Political science; Law and economics; Debt; Finance","score_opus":0.0941295086463844,"score_gpt":0.36665933033719056,"score_spread":0.27252982169080614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903681867","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040239267,0.122103296,0.0068790014,0.63115466,0.019901527,0.00016182504,0.00031646108,0.00022175045,0.1790222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32118148,0.078394346,0.008341513,0.4853295,0.021012811,0.00020728973,0.0003504111,0.00021379722,0.084968835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9744241,0.0058568595,0.002541098,0.0030380625,0.010483156,0.0036566416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92843264,0.051206272,0.00456369,0.0018134736,0.0126810325,0.0013028557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036969658,0.0004272547,0.00069150334,0.003616197,0.011112141,0.011334463,0.0040584896,0.020953042,0.004408604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.086256824,0.0012801046,0.0011726589,0.0053515215,0.007496781,0.005327304,0.0033842898,0.016947549,0.0011454746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052742507,0.00010603121,0.0014465292,0.00067881495,0.00006324769,0.0020741045,0.0082821725,0.0008308319,0.0012931852,0.44936118,0.44724104,0.08857021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003782507,0.00004359892,0.0021427246,0.00090055156,0.000074140284,0.0004633278,0.0024240941,0.00047086517,0.0009979364,0.028881617,0.9634583,0.00010500743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03599013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07850196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9640099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014827859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013434011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19551659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904170329","doi":"10.29173/alr1364","title":"The Law Society of Alberta in the Matter of Conduct of Kenneth Robert Sockett, Q.C.: A Brief Commentary on the Responsibilities and Perversions of Self Governance","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.033322593831416863,"score_gpt":0.2863692248769453,"score_spread":0.2530466310455285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904170329","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012120337,0.05151138,0.0002855021,0.90934277,0.015363637,0.000040004375,0.00017172661,0.000042014482,0.022030883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037926007,0.022274856,0.0009286249,0.83996636,0.012280982,0.00010333809,0.00009478895,0.000109981025,0.08631518],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98542595,0.0031522242,0.000675138,0.0019212818,0.006028011,0.002797462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753862,0.014773334,0.00087068416,0.0004123014,0.0065878164,0.001969696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016161885,0.0012054449,0.0018477882,0.0023056935,0.026868124,0.017685132,0.006131902,0.060510818,0.005984306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026978604,0.0017106468,0.0012755552,0.0052425605,0.01681245,0.004736758,0.0032930437,0.042635296,0.00143398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028470045,0.000008484413,0.00021277873,0.00011463772,0.000017802036,0.00018923452,0.0016372652,0.000121822726,0.00011193751,0.073548794,0.9196313,0.0043774163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045703116,0.000014896214,0.0019204635,0.00047466627,0.00004471454,0.000050506016,0.0017224589,0.00010930357,0.00016119688,0.01227332,0.98309225,0.000090495625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86865854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.943008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13134146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050359197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11429775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36538327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906326474","doi":"10.25071/1705-1436.76","title":"What’s Right Is Right: The Supreme Court Gets It","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Just Labour","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Right to be forgotten; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03514403942566111,"score_gpt":0.30081652285736965,"score_spread":0.2656724834317085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906326474","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023175381,0.00514115,0.010007421,0.74991596,0.0027148135,0.00003313825,0.00010059242,0.00006392593,0.20884758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85688084,0.0016186618,0.0033975088,0.11525637,0.002203558,0.000053238637,0.000064901455,0.00017188246,0.020353066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97703326,0.0117021175,0.0006888018,0.0025143488,0.0042642485,0.003797272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9595462,0.026188798,0.0018978431,0.0030573602,0.0046686893,0.0046411147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02478964,0.00056336867,0.0013806084,0.001870685,0.016737035,0.022444632,0.0021175877,0.019798767,0.0162206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061110727,0.00067802344,0.00086072064,0.0018753561,0.07536414,0.026328055,0.007971955,0.022455886,0.001901033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029840827,0.000039128263,0.00082766346,0.00004998256,0.000029650935,0.00014026514,0.008169018,0.00013460113,0.0001640798,0.9498097,0.03170168,0.008904282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021334428,0.000008821905,0.0005348167,0.00010607938,0.000012170222,0.000037190766,0.0039158603,0.00013043173,0.00010932882,0.9558831,0.039217312,0.000023581391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017777352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019414295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02478964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007450746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014025377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13110173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907377067","doi":"","title":"Older Drivers in the News: Killer Headlines v Raising Awareness","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Accident Research Centre, Monash University; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; U.S. Department of Justice; Government of Western Australia; Queensland University of Technology; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; Monash University; University of New South Wales; State Insurance Regulatory Authority; State Government of Victoria; Transport Accident Commission; Australian Government","keywords":"Raising (metalworking); Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Injury prevention; Advertising; Suicide prevention; Occupational safety and health; Project commissioning; Engineering; Internet privacy; Publishing; Medical emergency; Computer security; Psychology; Forensic engineering; Political science; Business; Medicine; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.06993890466540861,"score_gpt":0.37789662896172876,"score_spread":0.3079577242963202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907377067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8670502,0.010376829,0.00048398392,0.05766665,0.0015723016,0.000051435916,0.0002500298,0.00004323044,0.06250533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734162,0.0070458166,0.0002869483,0.007158578,0.0018853532,0.00003248703,0.00012637452,0.00003683985,0.010011394],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976382,0.0011685921,0.00015700783,0.00012990698,0.0006722423,0.0002339952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736701,0.017495565,0.004220889,0.00045090815,0.003059333,0.001103109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036808217,0.00021280009,0.00023635544,0.0023084262,0.00292589,0.0051793368,0.00034953654,0.0013598126,0.00446458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02320455,0.0002447167,0.00016185077,0.001986129,0.002732249,0.0052470956,0.0023327966,0.0016338401,0.0005922997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013815315,0.00010525253,0.043243073,0.0016996871,0.000040052502,0.0018993804,0.7890964,0.000051771865,0.0024979908,0.010319801,0.04557501,0.105333336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001723119,0.00015643438,0.10019425,0.0019018908,0.000071613154,0.0007952337,0.60867625,0.00014276504,0.0012739626,0.0018631077,0.28485838,0.0000488898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008997997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009742166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008997997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021003035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014991574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019466281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W29090523","doi":"","title":"Hiding the Meat of the Patent Bargain: Supreme Court of Canada Voids Viagra Patent for Insufficient Disclosure","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Business; Law; Patent infringement; Patent troll; Patent law; Political science; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.028723383076222596,"score_gpt":0.24574849024043244,"score_spread":0.21702510716420984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W29090523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08775531,0.005710222,0.009853097,0.36690834,0.0016696253,0.00030946406,0.0014954155,0.0003327352,0.5259658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7136471,0.0022528456,0.0031886238,0.18381988,0.0010375826,0.00015710547,0.00028696822,0.00017328191,0.09543671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9754116,0.0020719003,0.0008130553,0.0026880472,0.011793186,0.0072222454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98070437,0.010004603,0.00086034933,0.0010916165,0.0059007267,0.0014382475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016164623,0.00063988625,0.0010494755,0.0018530505,0.025750257,0.015139109,0.0038917714,0.030049218,0.00696655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0499892,0.0011048634,0.001264378,0.0028218867,0.012317876,0.005498242,0.0052170684,0.024675678,0.0013188387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010910452,0.00004808537,0.0023490544,0.000049316273,0.00005094525,0.0012710681,0.006262908,0.00031466465,0.0010464584,0.8360183,0.14131895,0.011161105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034536002,0.00014646436,0.010095801,0.00077455223,0.0004038644,0.00080832833,0.007881842,0.0035893323,0.0045402544,0.24047315,0.73039937,0.0005417345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8349388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8863388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16506118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041092064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08784938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33206648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913114798","doi":"","title":"Legalization Is Only the Start: Canada Must Do Right by Its ‘Cannabis Criminals’","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Cannabis; Criminology; Political science; Computer security; Business; Law; Computer science; Psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.01639693815726617,"score_gpt":0.2786389157213551,"score_spread":0.2622419775640889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913114798","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024545195,0.006687892,0.001105945,0.7247838,0.0017382113,0.000038388047,0.00013249012,0.000103307575,0.24086477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5482586,0.004369456,0.001744145,0.1563134,0.00043287242,0.000024381967,0.00009887862,0.00012618059,0.28863215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99680746,0.00042002348,0.000047701335,0.0002850819,0.0011158704,0.0013239351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996429,0.00056628534,0.00014526049,0.0001439339,0.0012723674,0.0014431203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002111593,0.0002726465,0.00024916054,0.0006001096,0.030824507,0.010903906,0.0012787539,0.006522595,0.0118893385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007480178,0.00025547706,0.00018959066,0.0009008328,0.02170612,0.0040303506,0.002697369,0.009549724,0.0011101284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029383289,0.000036228128,0.0023741433,0.000056178582,0.000007720022,0.00043055564,0.02108187,0.00012189842,0.00053808163,0.52972263,0.40617836,0.039422926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000082825545,0.000017389919,0.0032119409,0.000105262414,0.000006212559,0.000098400036,0.013651803,0.00012015569,0.0003776371,0.018740715,0.963622,0.000040169503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9582927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9841283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049467582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049467582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14132802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35891408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914700484","doi":"","title":"A Reply on","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.011615090475031595,"score_gpt":0.30005514424973684,"score_spread":0.2884400537747052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914700484","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001269353,0.0010761739,0.00013419922,0.9165088,0.07768195,0.0000096443,0.00018019274,0.000040246712,0.0042419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019973046,0.0006466002,0.00013484218,0.95864975,0.021090914,0.000027119673,0.00007705118,0.000046961446,0.017329484],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942415,0.0012150332,0.00054961944,0.0011065266,0.0020069282,0.0008804983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881592,0.005532718,0.00053584017,0.0006201437,0.0038216717,0.0013303361],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049815606,0.0009044718,0.0009405696,0.001060101,0.004364006,0.0056613144,0.0028093464,0.032113295,0.04674171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036164403,0.0005624297,0.0015086398,0.00090256316,0.0034886734,0.0058830823,0.004352483,0.032774538,0.024247697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001068571,0.0000040302393,0.000055850775,0.000021170987,0.000002841426,0.000045054985,0.0000638601,0.0000061983546,0.000029869121,0.0021637934,0.9961903,0.0014063097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000179599,0.000011030785,0.0004417659,0.00015678257,0.000010021417,0.00012328688,0.00042538333,0.0000352466,0.0001555168,0.003533035,0.99506277,0.000027246337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053275363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008046589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9532583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034618508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004842819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915677960","doi":"10.36641/mjgl.25.2.strange","title":"The Strange Pairing: Building Alliances Between Queer Activists and Conservative Groups to Recognize New Families","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Journal of Gender & Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Operationalization; Normative; Political science; Family law; Power (physics); Politics; Dissent; Law; Criticism; Sociology; Law and economics; Gender studies","score_opus":0.06771112213284422,"score_gpt":0.33837304921252676,"score_spread":0.2706619270796825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915677960","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37190267,0.002408321,0.022366146,0.19279921,0.0017647854,0.00031938267,0.000034133955,0.00019261891,0.40821263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96266955,0.00041868282,0.002037148,0.013414236,0.00023016546,0.000093902665,0.000011580761,0.000023233542,0.021101616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892838,0.006821459,0.000073728515,0.0005802162,0.0005863209,0.0026544402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99207836,0.003014267,0.0008312928,0.0004784403,0.00037701664,0.0032206236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010142292,0.0003962621,0.00030169016,0.0010642477,0.03702675,0.008834665,0.0013176039,0.0040573794,0.008998874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011607539,0.00039696178,0.00041092496,0.0007017242,0.0265071,0.00859097,0.013552948,0.0069381683,0.00073063426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007583741,0.0001694662,0.007898018,0.000044814497,0.00001669889,0.0009377195,0.32564476,0.00033936565,0.0009684331,0.58476895,0.024722436,0.054413408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060175804,0.0001598554,0.0051889084,0.00026607158,0.000022924698,0.00031403618,0.33400634,0.0007315877,0.0009017496,0.112083025,0.54618853,0.000076787204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03897522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1259999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03897522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007048107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01226726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07749671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916970689","doi":"","title":"The Attorney General's Standing to Seek Relief in the Public Interest: The Evolving Doctrine of Parens Patriae","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Supreme court; Public interest; Context (archaeology); Political science; History","score_opus":0.07240285337715215,"score_gpt":0.3456311690745672,"score_spread":0.27322831569741507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916970689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10236827,0.047564905,0.009861144,0.28435218,0.00094307214,0.000036597456,0.000065089196,0.000049779414,0.554759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96572447,0.005961787,0.0012107047,0.011232011,0.0004729667,0.000013305983,0.000013082315,0.000021548673,0.01535021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899996,0.0036114778,0.00031931952,0.0011897845,0.0031150614,0.0017647209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98838544,0.007794207,0.0008261541,0.0005061485,0.00185521,0.00063279766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011289101,0.00018822803,0.00039629178,0.0018481814,0.010985626,0.016229495,0.0015686352,0.009362884,0.0015687712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02188975,0.00039253858,0.00026574693,0.0025590821,0.049850926,0.0062777,0.0035843279,0.010119056,0.00024422863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025556747,0.0000035227931,0.00036130214,0.000008475868,0.0000015825849,0.00006794019,0.0030448842,0.00006437155,0.000046155266,0.9884355,0.0034029451,0.004560691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023796174,0.000027175358,0.00786422,0.00055049715,0.000023719052,0.00029471074,0.0112441685,0.0010241962,0.00032733867,0.69444114,0.28410748,0.00007161153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29157197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36978304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.708428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024881693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038246613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5797497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918249602","doi":"10.70658/4486-1457.1451","title":"Social Enterprise Law in Action: Organizational Characteristics of U.S. Benefit Corporations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Toronto Mississauga; University of Denver","keywords":"Corporation; Shareholder; Corporate law; Legislation; Statute; Limited liability; Business; Politics; Law and economics; Corporate governance; Law; Economics; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.02400868845019108,"score_gpt":0.2948512677926852,"score_spread":0.2708425793424941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918249602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9807522,0.00029349374,0.00019073502,0.0014345847,0.000008810369,0.00003063053,0.000109725945,0.0000073675046,0.017172473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983865,0.00015524881,0.00010800546,0.00018619202,0.000008037173,0.000014035177,0.00011264644,0.000003127752,0.001026203],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824,0.00040058658,0.00010129951,0.00022252943,0.0005293935,0.00050620764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98763436,0.0027438535,0.00509887,0.00046025563,0.0012514305,0.0028112428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018877849,0.000113861075,0.00016476888,0.003630358,0.0032934083,0.0036765295,0.0005868188,0.00067230157,0.0032524248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007573724,0.00014071769,0.0001533862,0.003756909,0.0029472245,0.0027156519,0.0030141668,0.0011105108,0.00036416872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003414952,0.00024449464,0.9382666,0.000019920342,0.000015892032,0.00025239505,0.022040255,0.00018335674,0.00041272424,0.012796891,0.0035259915,0.022207346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003454909,0.000055977212,0.94650084,0.0000456891,0.000006955845,0.00014970453,0.036893,0.00048188306,0.00013630987,0.0019202224,0.013794349,0.0000116009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019453337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037611544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019453337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024998542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002534153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038680255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W29320652","doi":"","title":"Comparative Perspectives on Lawyer Regulation: An Agenda for Reform in the United States and Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law reform; Law; Regulatory reform; Public administration; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04000465346090345,"score_gpt":0.3178044839275043,"score_spread":0.2777998304666009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W29320652","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13341568,0.039229438,0.0010024644,0.54673105,0.00097627996,0.0001227316,0.00040421842,0.000046468293,0.27807182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91353816,0.019018566,0.0011239576,0.045683775,0.00026090152,0.000073976254,0.0001533935,0.000024988127,0.020122275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98321354,0.002841192,0.00033185605,0.00080259517,0.004040082,0.008770793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98367786,0.0036309403,0.00077373016,0.00028130837,0.0071094604,0.004526786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009763672,0.00033907074,0.00089549023,0.0049806153,0.033394773,0.020200541,0.004096761,0.009530274,0.0076607545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019661019,0.00041341304,0.000807347,0.008107332,0.016800229,0.0043245116,0.004533951,0.007779969,0.00022189636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080006896,0.000112314854,0.007742597,0.00019614342,0.00004006956,0.0004685616,0.016941635,0.0013543632,0.0002771349,0.906018,0.03582661,0.030942615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022160234,0.00014033528,0.08219576,0.0026560598,0.00031361493,0.00026899533,0.159376,0.0048554717,0.0008680759,0.12554447,0.6231043,0.00045530967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99593663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32734817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.32734817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.421641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7801808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2938388826","doi":"10.1089/glr2.2019.2351","title":"CONNECTICUT GAMING DEAL BACK ON","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"WiLAN (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.032635087150380125,"score_gpt":0.3260474541890375,"score_spread":0.2934123670386574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2938388826","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012710362,0.017842941,0.0006911077,0.15455231,0.012850405,0.00039069544,0.0022932992,0.00031306615,0.7983558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05121896,0.0058947583,0.00049456593,0.13411646,0.0025946638,0.00044617054,0.0006805076,0.00012688826,0.8044271],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99596465,0.00047198913,0.0001489072,0.0006335492,0.0018590472,0.00092186924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938771,0.002622068,0.00020114542,0.0003740375,0.0021192408,0.0008064092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026047954,0.00094670674,0.000982466,0.0060153306,0.014380043,0.017170649,0.0026002254,0.020869546,0.074738346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012313334,0.00090225023,0.001013683,0.003595271,0.0031185849,0.003303821,0.0027610944,0.010931929,0.010075166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047448102,0.000087430024,0.0011483745,0.000091984584,0.000030783835,0.0003681712,0.00028077868,0.00019508267,0.00028517176,0.10097965,0.8776311,0.018854065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005461891,0.000036877016,0.006043065,0.0006600074,0.000058206995,0.00008736588,0.00059348997,0.0003707871,0.00051108043,0.008844456,0.9826804,0.00005973276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29881448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64235747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29881448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016951125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02978617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59415036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943030016","doi":"10.14264/uql.2019.267","title":"The governance of hydraulic fracturing in unconventional resources: the elements, form and effectiveness of the regulations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"The University of Queensland","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hydraulic fracturing; Legislation; Resource (disambiguation); Jurisdiction; Business; Corporate governance; Lease; Process (computing); Environmental planning; Engineering; Political science; Law; Geography; Petroleum engineering; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.006950601032907184,"score_gpt":0.23184428594038828,"score_spread":0.2248936849074811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943030016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8043308,0.00072460005,0.024984987,0.0042130956,0.000027020982,0.00015624553,0.00009576837,0.00004462341,0.16542283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968676,0.00014209046,0.0014934784,0.000059964223,0.0000027486615,0.000026686854,0.0000133890035,0.000004723285,0.0013893064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955089,0.0026651933,0.00018999228,0.0003507022,0.00071917404,0.00056599855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918656,0.0046092654,0.0014023975,0.0006643202,0.0011206341,0.00033773453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004197354,0.000098257995,0.0001461307,0.0010144525,0.0022285243,0.004137619,0.0005572503,0.00054441066,0.0011118652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009213374,0.00019107552,0.00012212648,0.001820821,0.010891956,0.0022349302,0.0019989973,0.000897047,0.00009819028],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003703558,0.00003957002,0.03428948,0.00013421057,0.000017606644,0.00064902805,0.07924672,0.005676491,0.0028077576,0.8375569,0.0014776341,0.038067702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004395489,0.00018890228,0.19576892,0.0012483839,0.00006356131,0.00079064455,0.24057521,0.013723616,0.005637196,0.29728922,0.2444968,0.00017344255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01872493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028156549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01872493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006460407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063009006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046873808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943469719","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1338","title":"R v Smith and Judicially Reviewing the Scope of Criminal Law under the Charter","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Law; Possession (linguistics); Charter; Political science; Criminal law; Authorization; Criminal procedure; Scope (computer science); Philosophy; Computer security","score_opus":0.05240966874915045,"score_gpt":0.3235476951893797,"score_spread":0.2711380264402293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943469719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053836644,0.027282601,0.016168995,0.1778294,0.0045325966,0.0006328549,0.0008046656,0.0004748193,0.7184374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5111408,0.013434243,0.018866831,0.17813797,0.001976305,0.00041053788,0.0004650256,0.0001590216,0.27540928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872162,0.0019472187,0.00068635365,0.001899885,0.005664495,0.0025858388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883267,0.0057679485,0.000570697,0.00049467845,0.0044341395,0.00040577204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009403733,0.00044232726,0.00053002837,0.0019112827,0.008142058,0.006066204,0.002320454,0.011315631,0.0032331035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028195564,0.0006037347,0.0009993303,0.001396953,0.009064498,0.0029363488,0.0017898586,0.008857246,0.00073494256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015328553,0.000012573717,0.0009600986,0.000108567634,0.000014953504,0.0004545,0.0028701557,0.0003621279,0.0005561764,0.8501693,0.12510324,0.019372942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052632393,0.00006786162,0.006676622,0.0006139898,0.0000990854,0.00036899283,0.0020658628,0.0011229973,0.0020027116,0.108896166,0.87784153,0.00019162375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7689351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8480621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7689351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026846325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08246572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46485138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943917422","doi":"","title":"The Ship is Not the Only Vessel on the River: Revisiting First Nations' Mobility Rights under Article III of the 1794 Jay Treaty","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Damages; Tort; Harm; Law; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Political science; Treaty; Causation; Liability; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.025309398463645782,"score_gpt":0.30756244866963506,"score_spread":0.2822530502059893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943917422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02804261,0.083227605,0.005140979,0.20816948,0.0035060635,0.00011437238,0.0001397115,0.000058561393,0.67160064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6079156,0.06704641,0.005141055,0.16396788,0.0028707173,0.0003009832,0.00017024437,0.00008808592,0.1524991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99398005,0.002351669,0.0002787018,0.00061040913,0.0016619929,0.001117284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99679416,0.0020628076,0.0003147805,0.00018817568,0.0004945868,0.00014549843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0090424195,0.0003294101,0.00043636723,0.001445857,0.0062067164,0.0064600576,0.0021121115,0.010319963,0.003856818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0110041695,0.00033169895,0.0006560092,0.0012448248,0.02080961,0.005409529,0.0039812564,0.009370508,0.00078727945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054098305,0.000007997049,0.00028484024,0.00009684124,0.0000036000963,0.00021479167,0.004375601,0.00014927259,0.00009867727,0.9621464,0.020948382,0.011668135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018406556,0.00004032103,0.0021545626,0.0020251374,0.000022833454,0.00030254936,0.005796544,0.00021483835,0.0004361317,0.12535387,0.86358255,0.00005222534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11169696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1548741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88830304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010545214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025046779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22209364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944998944","doi":"","title":"Dewey Ranch and the Role of the Bankruptcy Court in Decisions Relating to the Permissible Control of National Sports Leagues Over Individual Franchise Owners","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; League; Phoenix; Franchise; Law; Relocation; Section (typography); Business; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Advertising; Marketing; History","score_opus":0.02419912512742232,"score_gpt":0.2746869947154551,"score_spread":0.25048786958803276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944998944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040157937,0.030568853,0.003088811,0.21557961,0.001318447,0.0002772765,0.0002310891,0.00006910758,0.7087088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6298962,0.0119101,0.0020772265,0.084772095,0.0014257445,0.00037695427,0.0000934501,0.0000724069,0.26937583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913818,0.0028826925,0.00029200222,0.0010303573,0.0018606613,0.0025524483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891403,0.008501612,0.0005320385,0.00022517244,0.001012281,0.00058857055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008699842,0.0004671882,0.00050575007,0.0019616624,0.016712302,0.013303692,0.002363993,0.015257316,0.012758184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020540463,0.00091259286,0.00041973952,0.0017659545,0.013623918,0.007486078,0.0037591564,0.011223538,0.0013129902],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038042068,0.000033416763,0.001288435,0.000043412518,0.000005892506,0.00063322205,0.004080581,0.00037208007,0.00014141084,0.8860177,0.09725572,0.010090163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013948928,0.000135988,0.0113025885,0.0016720408,0.000056789417,0.00062107644,0.017838638,0.0025846865,0.001139016,0.30142838,0.6629095,0.00017188575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23439638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34091058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23439638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016206529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018237812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4660641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946304970","doi":"","title":"Mapping Territorial Limitations on Insurance Coverage","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital USD (University of San Diego)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Business; Liability; International trade; Economics; Finance; Market economy","score_opus":0.03350818900713962,"score_gpt":0.23772586878507437,"score_spread":0.20421767977793476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946304970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75985557,0.0021556572,0.012848273,0.0020278036,0.000057715086,0.00016952363,0.009687949,0.00018733015,0.21301018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99046785,0.0004170768,0.0026281825,0.00011374833,0.000021266118,0.00008363513,0.0032961369,0.000059636903,0.00291245],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900176,0.0027497075,0.0010075709,0.0014673801,0.003560431,0.0011973472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9280046,0.043016538,0.011412697,0.005411139,0.010697087,0.0014578974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059953523,0.00036591585,0.0005575797,0.005609664,0.0015207988,0.004979318,0.001528769,0.0011924079,0.01590796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07882005,0.00043473952,0.0006508674,0.0066378643,0.0030198754,0.006365313,0.0053626043,0.0017814619,0.0017390647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042700782,0.00013621723,0.5419227,0.00070272293,0.00023266482,0.001551635,0.018670596,0.01852177,0.0021800129,0.33095342,0.018990329,0.065710925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060643673,0.00025187864,0.5815307,0.0012883771,0.0004531235,0.0025875056,0.054610696,0.06405354,0.004706999,0.08113759,0.20910573,0.00021324598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04707346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031364724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04707346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004250137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021951997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0935989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947492467","doi":"10.7202/1059255ar","title":"Death Bed Marriages in the Commonwealth Caribbean","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Geography; Ethnology; Genealogy; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01951997130616902,"score_gpt":0.2793692158514105,"score_spread":0.2598492445452415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947492467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87051046,0.0050510056,0.0001474607,0.0042705582,0.000060512553,0.000049148242,0.0001560335,0.0000064743936,0.11974824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920853,0.0016354964,0.00005550321,0.0005154616,0.000012488871,0.000010502311,0.0000455428,0.0000030051058,0.0056366236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985714,0.0002672486,0.00004661358,0.00009171062,0.00015979417,0.0008632288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986027,0.00041221277,0.00032803393,0.000063157066,0.00033394984,0.00025995393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009576793,0.000117574615,0.00031500385,0.001768047,0.01227719,0.0025750436,0.00073875056,0.0011556795,0.0035423639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038596785,0.0001859566,0.00019483933,0.0018342695,0.0037976922,0.00048061827,0.0032814092,0.001480845,0.00016035489],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003520069,0.00014540435,0.278722,0.0004672939,0.00013601447,0.01563624,0.21910453,0.0012125855,0.0018753115,0.3729709,0.019005565,0.09037221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044531876,0.00008229807,0.566143,0.0010705431,0.00015749109,0.0014668274,0.282279,0.0004403576,0.00059072877,0.006612269,0.14101242,0.00010059704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81045693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92526174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81045693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011306871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006931952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38131863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953111865","doi":"","title":"The Emerging Presence of Mexican Law in California Courts","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital USD (University of San Diego)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.011799568202224671,"score_gpt":0.2339182678745312,"score_spread":0.22211869967230655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953111865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9070102,0.0039651077,0.00018806054,0.011313044,0.00008675178,0.00001331562,0.00024799976,0.000021844478,0.07715374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99519485,0.0015759937,0.00012052116,0.00071281404,0.00009160261,0.000005299821,0.000091997805,0.0000055713904,0.002201402],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985078,0.00024268097,0.000052787833,0.00037641474,0.00042871802,0.0003915718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964289,0.00061746145,0.0012237356,0.00018938564,0.000866397,0.0006741595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020568087,0.00011297316,0.00026625057,0.0032336263,0.004547096,0.0058795386,0.0007013996,0.00094002584,0.0036354978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048333993,0.0003666247,0.00014814807,0.0035444836,0.0050819,0.0031123043,0.0033635485,0.0023208116,0.00013334396],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041366377,0.00022515339,0.4920022,0.0005957744,0.00014187027,0.004817388,0.14236835,0.0004286805,0.0028448976,0.18807343,0.051197052,0.116891585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004948386,0.00007524757,0.7650556,0.000557772,0.00009736207,0.0011131497,0.079767495,0.00034370087,0.0004062162,0.005386745,0.14705177,0.00009552666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13846265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29768798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13846265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00643078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023501932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27531344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953283758","doi":"10.82308/7073","title":"Abuse of intellectual property rights in the US and Canada comparing theories of social obligations and abuse of rights","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Law; Political science; Reservation of rights; Intellectual property; Statutory law; Fundamental rights; Right to property; Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01662398767493088,"score_gpt":0.23532386354866777,"score_spread":0.2186998758737369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953283758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72698385,0.009403805,0.0007661603,0.017954066,0.00009780247,0.00008427177,0.0011412463,0.000035909314,0.2435328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890753,0.002719128,0.00020076246,0.0006659539,0.000009232598,0.000019317258,0.00017504468,0.000012081008,0.0071231886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99580127,0.0005541572,0.00011763723,0.00025708205,0.00149464,0.001775204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897976,0.0026126578,0.000877487,0.0003725605,0.005187919,0.0011517587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003184045,0.0003148231,0.00057309854,0.0051983264,0.011991584,0.007666212,0.001819639,0.0012373221,0.0058635175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014455391,0.00028072865,0.00061067555,0.012522749,0.010294251,0.0027927787,0.0036229952,0.0021260758,0.00017282416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024238619,0.00009468681,0.13722849,0.00028126827,0.00013065347,0.0005371624,0.07182461,0.005144155,0.00020546325,0.6920582,0.022821553,0.069431305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013689432,0.00007048383,0.4271642,0.0015987415,0.00032317446,0.00021891909,0.27529895,0.009854282,0.00045129162,0.085485816,0.19908908,0.00030802164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99881506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21505545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21505545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20496273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9104244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954974037","doi":"10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1297","title":"North American and Australian LGBT Movement and Interest Groups","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social movement; Movement (music); Gender studies; Political science; Identity (music); Sociology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.07421144016963192,"score_gpt":0.3780513985747297,"score_spread":0.30383995840509775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954974037","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5232603,0.00774063,0.0007111762,0.017445775,0.00057625934,0.00017671943,0.0005857479,0.000020689213,0.4494827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85522413,0.007073998,0.0011636643,0.006405784,0.00017275209,0.00045643988,0.0004429772,0.000034624267,0.12902574],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737823,0.00089221896,0.00010369152,0.00020931127,0.0007751807,0.000641413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961223,0.00064033415,0.00042942385,0.00016853455,0.0013588686,0.0012806212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027575032,0.00024254368,0.0002441553,0.0026259106,0.009069961,0.002954267,0.00081541063,0.0009793643,0.0131084835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058568977,0.00019990974,0.00024896607,0.0049769916,0.00284534,0.002986389,0.003191914,0.0018186336,0.0011806609],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014067344,0.00035726582,0.101502694,0.00043551868,0.000023748813,0.0006197653,0.6037184,0.00006132962,0.00038240975,0.11391628,0.06758983,0.11125212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008543595,0.000058111294,0.43207192,0.00050414214,0.000018002125,0.0003464528,0.22345085,0.00015001759,0.000106550644,0.004685276,0.33856955,0.000030686173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3611957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5346086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3611957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069008768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007915435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7181866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955425684","doi":"","title":"Repeal the Jones Act for American Energy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; Port (circuit theory); Oil refinery; Oil boom; Business; Boom; Commerce; International trade; Government (linguistics); Petroleum industry; Downstream (manufacturing); Economic shortage; Economy; Economics; Engineering; Law; Marketing; Waste management; Political science","score_opus":0.039446651221369075,"score_gpt":0.3286791863043932,"score_spread":0.2892325350830241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955425684","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001183893,0.0022174506,0.000988458,0.0481849,0.01296978,0.00033203678,0.001084299,0.0006862944,0.93235296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010685732,0.0013963409,0.0012587976,0.13981253,0.003063206,0.0006028515,0.0010575729,0.0004871434,0.8416358],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913201,0.0008712976,0.00049451663,0.0011652126,0.0045854542,0.0015634525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915292,0.001662978,0.0003206047,0.0014234314,0.004148548,0.000915209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058338377,0.001351247,0.0010723441,0.0013158765,0.006025743,0.009098173,0.0027136623,0.020523665,0.11193348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018936774,0.00088935054,0.0013417292,0.0012254893,0.0026313136,0.0045807343,0.0045306077,0.021704769,0.12235026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003840305,0.000092155045,0.00022209484,0.00009184709,0.000006992087,0.00021930691,0.00014977227,0.000058288657,0.00039476337,0.0667345,0.9158174,0.016174503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047425374,0.000007145525,0.00021541525,0.00003699543,0.0000016530042,0.000029322842,0.000029248913,0.000019157334,0.000049961294,0.0010066385,0.99859303,0.000006588695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027702633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03529655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11193348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032820627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014450922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37445474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963512296","doi":"10.29173/alr2548","title":"After the Hammer: Six Years of Meads v. Meads","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Pedagogy; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.012744714712181722,"score_gpt":0.28665101674335247,"score_spread":0.2739063020311707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963512296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42389923,0.028727438,0.002828495,0.2963434,0.0023022648,0.000119509765,0.00021955335,0.000077586024,0.24548253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9242774,0.0041681128,0.00061462546,0.026769495,0.0004455526,0.00003566585,0.000044046363,0.0000605436,0.04358451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993208,0.0033145454,0.00018851008,0.0007601036,0.0014331635,0.0010957441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98479134,0.011247167,0.00085313583,0.00066434836,0.0013876897,0.0010562517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014553341,0.00023510668,0.00048291625,0.0019294709,0.01696253,0.009684996,0.0009190737,0.0061214636,0.0037583585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036118373,0.00047331644,0.0002452876,0.0017523841,0.025982339,0.008863761,0.0054880613,0.0096168835,0.00037887602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001108513,0.000058559446,0.0047526998,0.00010203164,0.000012219318,0.0024492652,0.27469692,0.00015084477,0.0002917141,0.5855365,0.07193887,0.059899487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016843816,0.00006134477,0.0058528893,0.000655776,0.000009495932,0.0005891432,0.13546908,0.00014777022,0.00057515,0.055737138,0.80082726,0.00005800024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07511011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15665935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9248899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015281034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0095985485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14934582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963561557","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Canadian Law: Constitution and Charter of Rights","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Charter; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02381715427103188,"score_gpt":0.2810135466251489,"score_spread":0.257196392354117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963561557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061089047,0.06018052,0.0012473637,0.032953072,0.0022321483,0.00021303137,0.012333902,0.0004237212,0.8843073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047999293,0.022150187,0.0030928655,0.0049506687,0.00047903167,0.00019670336,0.0030319218,0.00025542657,0.91784394],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822503,0.00013805463,0.00007108063,0.00014202636,0.0010586883,0.00036507417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847275,0.00018829439,0.000048273676,0.00005662078,0.0010759461,0.00015807753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012942837,0.0013055576,0.0005608425,0.0060312836,0.011603672,0.0104233,0.0019928196,0.0065067722,0.059968386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003873503,0.0008358729,0.00053313636,0.012700619,0.004005369,0.0036515377,0.001997335,0.005378452,0.0041792663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016064396,0.000020357405,0.00047155365,0.00015816827,0.0000051648744,0.000094933326,0.0015950734,0.00023028244,0.000080047226,0.29359052,0.6749653,0.02877244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007263922,0.0000033227457,0.002935003,0.0002542982,0.0000073542437,0.000042164644,0.0010993303,0.00009342608,0.00012537299,0.008590847,0.98681206,0.000029550254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98991895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10179766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10179766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20513673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73859715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969647344","doi":"","title":"Freedom of Disposition v. Duty of Support: What's a Child Worth?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disposition; Duty; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.0071184082202724866,"score_gpt":0.2567437064569111,"score_spread":0.2496252982366386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969647344","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027144277,0.007901748,0.0034525334,0.08722342,0.0011430554,0.000044021057,0.00013573244,0.000027201659,0.87292814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86674726,0.0058160746,0.0015019478,0.03530971,0.0012633998,0.00014736048,0.00011738231,0.00006164161,0.08903515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995144,0.0015692994,0.00022071115,0.0005649022,0.0012572163,0.001243896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764293,0.0011389423,0.0003021188,0.00020413217,0.00036041526,0.0003513617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039439886,0.0003677434,0.0003290112,0.0006371202,0.0058349688,0.008525205,0.00096252793,0.0066176304,0.0057230624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006387827,0.00025062702,0.0005115023,0.0011058336,0.02602187,0.0085345525,0.004075714,0.009472684,0.0008432078],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005467741,0.00000677984,0.00035758063,0.00001166339,0.000001041296,0.000045867935,0.0021036793,0.0000277521,0.00002924131,0.9894106,0.004106109,0.0038942464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023208155,0.00008075651,0.0059870603,0.00087724347,0.000023046045,0.00057168765,0.010106046,0.00022350322,0.0005478841,0.41952965,0.56197476,0.00005512312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022962347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029757136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022962347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071258266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061726472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051701725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977144259","doi":"10.7202/1064941ar","title":"Is Genetic Discrimination Back on the Radar? A Commentary on the Recent Court of Appeal Reference Decision on the Genetic Non-Discrimination Act (GNDA)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Bioethics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Université de Montréal; Génome Québec; Genome Canada","keywords":"Appeal; Genetic discrimination; Opposition (politics); Law; Political science; Closing (real estate); Government (linguistics); Criminology; Sociology; Genetic testing; Politics; Genetics; Biology","score_opus":0.09335878304915689,"score_gpt":0.33277665070631796,"score_spread":0.23941786765716105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977144259","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00047273052,0.0056285937,0.00010735303,0.9785519,0.010502053,0.000008858484,0.000037181468,0.000008671095,0.004682702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009000562,0.0017237279,0.00012858216,0.9779798,0.007472659,0.000018011306,0.000014589144,0.0000238026,0.0036383127],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9680503,0.0105979685,0.0017581634,0.003859244,0.0106533,0.0050810575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9118387,0.059108205,0.0018717913,0.0008671818,0.022009602,0.0043044407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029940726,0.0009503451,0.0022492025,0.002544495,0.021710064,0.012232543,0.009474183,0.06780712,0.0055387905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.093787365,0.00096421177,0.0022977819,0.0032032323,0.025596263,0.005466039,0.0025718869,0.05433901,0.0018514629],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037478607,0.000011361134,0.00025838346,0.00013943715,0.000020026158,0.00063784636,0.0030884726,0.000088490684,0.00012866248,0.037052974,0.95323783,0.0052990387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007644761,0.000026750957,0.0014061452,0.0020836887,0.000095277785,0.00040470436,0.0058706817,0.00028365487,0.00026546515,0.025497412,0.96379316,0.00019664544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73587924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7985594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26412076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07108395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09652338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5313524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978221471","doi":"10.5840/cpsem200619","title":"Disabling the Normative Because \"She Can Afford To\"","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Semiotics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.027264173748833435,"score_gpt":0.28460597307565455,"score_spread":0.2573417993268211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978221471","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003376047,0.0014680033,0.026771843,0.036615517,0.0008854366,0.0000306942,0.000033835662,0.000107177126,0.9307113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55148256,0.0017129942,0.011105025,0.017923614,0.0015036666,0.0003442787,0.00006814135,0.00050202303,0.41535777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922611,0.004444431,0.00021442177,0.0008377142,0.0016877905,0.0005545093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99587727,0.0019945484,0.00022576838,0.0008255115,0.0008148885,0.00026196212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006412,0.0007163604,0.00071350223,0.0012689619,0.007832628,0.010652979,0.0014492762,0.0066074287,0.01200278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009810753,0.00053826673,0.00037183214,0.0008439043,0.05122964,0.013057296,0.0050421837,0.011640644,0.003937737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.771727e-7,0.0000018737214,0.000009049572,0.000003779697,3.5793283e-7,0.000005464384,0.0005972174,0.000008707171,0.000017140052,0.99624,0.0022149347,0.0009005424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004857091,0.000004507644,0.0000389531,0.000048148206,0.0000031341497,0.00007156978,0.0011573498,0.00011467486,0.00018078227,0.8662143,0.13215409,0.000007674543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005326003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009352365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01200278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038764917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075472053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040153265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978444439","doi":"10.29173/alr2568","title":"Is that All There Is? The Dubious Dividends of Daniels","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Connaught Fund; University of Toronto","keywords":"Dividend; Economics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Finance","score_opus":0.044039202841768266,"score_gpt":0.33135573181480504,"score_spread":0.2873165289730368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978444439","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015508875,0.013639366,0.0011471721,0.93848985,0.004111195,0.000007799768,0.00006848989,0.000022143193,0.040963136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18296733,0.01228299,0.0024497034,0.724709,0.012897721,0.00006425262,0.000065641725,0.00016229309,0.06440106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828091,0.004914516,0.00053652824,0.0025786015,0.0074146884,0.0017465736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9605438,0.025992086,0.0012711855,0.0024098107,0.007633411,0.0021497682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024129584,0.00054645224,0.0015532286,0.0019064741,0.009569269,0.0137367565,0.0025105008,0.018819729,0.0082096085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0657924,0.0006112937,0.00061181915,0.0017081137,0.043535843,0.016927645,0.0047422554,0.02932646,0.0017824882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001676027,0.0000071274976,0.00014684933,0.00002897219,0.00000879178,0.000020272448,0.0005481109,0.00006304291,0.00002282257,0.75404304,0.23667817,0.008416049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026127293,0.000007703109,0.00032714964,0.0002613841,0.000014315591,0.000029233619,0.0008763005,0.00020429905,0.0001299139,0.6522273,0.34586346,0.000032871816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09158093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12883034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09158093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016449032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022284763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1820957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978848097","doi":"10.1163/2211906x-00802005","title":"The Thought of Samuel J. Levine at the Intersection of the Talmudic and Constitutional Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Torah; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Judaism; Constitution; Narrative; Talmud; Constitutional law; Sociology; Constitutional interpretation; Philosophy; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.022699139442951943,"score_gpt":0.32111341021611084,"score_spread":0.2984142707731589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978848097","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046395674,0.058316812,0.0077740215,0.6658491,0.008041144,0.000024739158,0.0000918042,0.00009589852,0.21341085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8239281,0.020986969,0.006846774,0.08784323,0.00886592,0.00009546645,0.000060446913,0.00014020634,0.05123297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752516,0.0017216868,0.00003430621,0.0002532658,0.00030049338,0.00016510775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966126,0.0025063173,0.00018846842,0.00011580283,0.00030823026,0.0002687048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003226532,0.00044678533,0.00029984265,0.0021092563,0.004630663,0.009326705,0.00083309226,0.002979514,0.0025454285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068483846,0.00022931838,0.00023067513,0.0012565899,0.018822864,0.007531492,0.0017633934,0.004694086,0.00044074844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016934984,0.000011516562,0.00028060214,0.000029065233,0.0000028103755,0.0000839415,0.011162684,0.000045094454,0.000117238946,0.93328094,0.048916135,0.0060530603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020336152,0.000042091742,0.00076355366,0.00052367564,0.0000076267847,0.0002610097,0.015073719,0.0002693246,0.0004033167,0.30121604,0.6813907,0.00002857107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020397303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040799105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009326705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040193484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029603776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029162586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980960846","doi":"","title":"SENIORS ON THE STAND: ACCOMMODATING OLDER WITNESSES IN ADVERSARIAL TRIALS","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Witness; Psychology; Cognition; Cross-examination; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.06516766666459298,"score_gpt":0.3504715508136412,"score_spread":0.28530388414904817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980960846","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056608688,0.084315374,0.13985084,0.6124078,0.013030919,0.0066812634,0.00017282905,0.00024426848,0.08668796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5573624,0.034645934,0.16753021,0.21719606,0.008378937,0.0070700417,0.00011351597,0.00015535885,0.0075475434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.5100317,0.41104385,0.029293751,0.009920077,0.03225229,0.0074582854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.26928166,0.62125,0.03571429,0.031128373,0.032180093,0.010445568],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.6001658,0.00070670084,0.002128725,0.003960306,0.0112756705,0.017781131,0.008517531,0.018649586,0.0020748293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6991891,0.0013877202,0.0017101925,0.0024915377,0.02600483,0.025121426,0.019004159,0.019927265,0.0007265668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074476516,0.00021774662,0.0109243635,0.005938553,0.000556704,0.0035854108,0.081369184,0.00297723,0.0011229387,0.5408497,0.07058313,0.28113034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006094711,0.0007905294,0.005740687,0.032828968,0.0006291987,0.0020627012,0.01989775,0.0041866233,0.001968614,0.4250812,0.505772,0.00043228775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013832866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037728965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98616713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01124048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06351578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4930668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2985415371","doi":"10.5703/1288284317057","title":"Transfer Turns Ten: The Future of the Code","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Purdue Pharma (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Metadata; Intermediary; World Wide Web; Code (set theory); Service (business); Publishing; Terminology; Session (web analytics); Point (geometry); Library science; Telecommunications; Business; Political science; Law; Set (abstract data type); Marketing","score_opus":0.009280923608627594,"score_gpt":0.2556000762844916,"score_spread":0.24631915267586402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2985415371","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014503414,0.010452187,0.04933599,0.5811181,0.020297844,0.00014050074,0.00021311014,0.0016919178,0.32224694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5030774,0.018498164,0.06423098,0.1319641,0.016366111,0.0006898831,0.0007342051,0.004302999,0.26013622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9704668,0.012186014,0.0012642655,0.0022319218,0.010582658,0.0032684712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90293515,0.045608908,0.002819372,0.0122465845,0.026265126,0.010124812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031355146,0.0006389176,0.00052409153,0.0041596005,0.01263858,0.024730336,0.0032352433,0.010692063,0.020589372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10006353,0.00047744092,0.0009077857,0.0031083908,0.043912504,0.028407315,0.0085856635,0.014419919,0.0067140125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028268161,0.000026724325,0.00042607173,0.000067897796,0.0000032832552,0.00014673393,0.0058748373,0.00022440113,0.00016044354,0.8252865,0.10266182,0.06509305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011856872,0.000026543437,0.00045181872,0.00050543516,0.000005070587,0.00016904755,0.0036206078,0.00071266055,0.00032355127,0.23793717,0.75618047,0.000055709505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020693619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013084196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031355146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014092642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033491418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16582382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989946791","doi":"10.4324/9780429029813-15","title":"Privacy in North America","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.025005861697003844,"score_gpt":0.2749559333054913,"score_spread":0.24995007160848745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989946791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001720461,0.058749504,0.0007510935,0.022938702,0.0014162535,0.000013247938,0.000038148584,0.000033768938,0.91433895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17832212,0.08469134,0.0021256488,0.03848924,0.0024197756,0.00021277953,0.00013459468,0.00014431753,0.6934602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983021,0.0006053567,0.00005291838,0.00023337241,0.00048617012,0.00032001096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992186,0.00038999805,0.00005401618,0.00008138414,0.00016396394,0.00009209349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013212211,0.00044712404,0.00032401332,0.0013954832,0.011771573,0.009762671,0.00070014707,0.003539907,0.01638673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018389244,0.00035553114,0.0003696328,0.0024192284,0.009973126,0.0066868565,0.0038329621,0.0049204533,0.0031352472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031494317,0.000014855063,0.00012192257,0.00006499219,0.0000028935256,0.0001332619,0.00937556,0.000091245005,0.00005499885,0.85589427,0.11173482,0.022508034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012880786,0.0000028165418,0.00023875978,0.00016034114,0.000001490173,0.000101825965,0.0014587175,0.00003235311,0.000029327692,0.042537674,0.95543057,0.000004883648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059069913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0947806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94093007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013034051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010662401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.117452145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990727155","doi":"","title":"Nipped in the Bud: How Legal Disparities Create Financial Growth Hurdles in the State-Sanctioned Marijuana Industry and Why Bankruptcy Courts Can Provide a Remedy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Miami law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; State (computer science); Business; Law; Economics; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.013205102627574076,"score_gpt":0.22465827217102444,"score_spread":0.21145316954345036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990727155","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2709021,0.0054905256,0.0037518856,0.46147206,0.0016608929,0.00006852392,0.00020738541,0.00010918307,0.2563375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95004356,0.0028237114,0.00089872244,0.028860928,0.0006121748,0.000040774943,0.000067226196,0.00004866351,0.01660432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973572,0.0007062887,0.00008185559,0.00033595058,0.0005805857,0.00093819946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931525,0.00293731,0.00094858627,0.0003536818,0.0012585832,0.0013492998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038505085,0.00018977677,0.00038991557,0.0016744408,0.010135209,0.013592081,0.0015178842,0.004431726,0.012835217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019319339,0.00024810943,0.0005095976,0.0014831291,0.011243718,0.012394695,0.005729891,0.007394329,0.00096026046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060752955,0.00018366426,0.026531361,0.00006928149,0.000026640688,0.0010760772,0.0150008565,0.000682807,0.00030546248,0.80264544,0.07903236,0.07438533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116096155,0.00013128233,0.033812236,0.0010449551,0.00008889499,0.000667993,0.098355494,0.0027698353,0.0008409841,0.5840383,0.27800697,0.00012706761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034855235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06672524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034855235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073833275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010707231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069304705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993106835","doi":"","title":"Irreconcilable Differences? A Constitutional Analysis as to Why the United States Should Follow Canada's Lead and Allow Same-Sex Marriage","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lead (geology); Political science; Biology","score_opus":0.029057916912850385,"score_gpt":0.29068382459679754,"score_spread":0.26162590768394717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993106835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20920031,0.0020382078,0.007042562,0.10759358,0.0009997626,0.00034069477,0.001107699,0.00015319718,0.671524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.941246,0.00036692893,0.001492516,0.0269963,0.0002621975,0.00013600398,0.00008991388,0.000057581223,0.029352607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864364,0.0016440095,0.0004478365,0.0020326506,0.0034449666,0.0059940866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891355,0.0047140657,0.00056657434,0.0011396795,0.002714983,0.0017291865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011123985,0.00046589095,0.0012945598,0.0014733115,0.021593366,0.0120345615,0.0047426107,0.016084285,0.010636803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02440167,0.0009347885,0.0011808639,0.0020316096,0.022668688,0.0051036472,0.004070356,0.020390134,0.0007037705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028827168,0.000034911995,0.001338953,0.000012767396,0.000018369941,0.00010489647,0.001721789,0.0002544235,0.00017692764,0.9856538,0.007957863,0.0026964229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003460166,0.00009847366,0.014640067,0.00040767685,0.00034170502,0.0002304629,0.014956084,0.0029397502,0.0020467457,0.7365097,0.22717881,0.00030448154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6994125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8290534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30058748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024604868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06527631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60471535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993371085","doi":"10.29173/alr2581","title":"Under Construction: A Close Examination of Recent Construction Law Developments and Their Impact on the Oil and Gas Industry","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blueprint; Arbitration; Legislation; Jurisprudence; Law; Order (exchange); Common law; Procurement; Energy law; Construction industry; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Environmental law; Economics; Engineering; Construction engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.02808192877136987,"score_gpt":0.2977293875325276,"score_spread":0.2696474587611577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993371085","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1788057,0.3044272,0.0055551548,0.09448293,0.0013264515,0.00008314495,0.00019598457,0.00009130267,0.41503218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7785116,0.18001394,0.0018164407,0.010801647,0.00097439997,0.000030680203,0.00014953357,0.000067047265,0.027634682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916393,0.0017257087,0.00025362993,0.00065115234,0.0046753394,0.0010548552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908292,0.0053399303,0.0014671789,0.00027976267,0.001815268,0.00026845618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063292184,0.00023718324,0.00037465003,0.0056460164,0.0062849,0.013079622,0.0022678075,0.005352453,0.0036392375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012308042,0.0005241858,0.000327828,0.010138252,0.020239098,0.0044963174,0.0030957856,0.004652203,0.00033343927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018658355,0.00005161621,0.0040368955,0.0003968541,0.00001318156,0.0007130494,0.018969277,0.0011644419,0.00049604825,0.8697111,0.014354406,0.090074345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067063984,0.000054609456,0.03191134,0.0013533558,0.000024412126,0.00044283448,0.02045193,0.00066449627,0.0004908645,0.031895246,0.9126502,0.000053983174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33245257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.456977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66754746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035446875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027318308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66103494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993495833","doi":"","title":"\"Nothing Less than Indispensable\": The Expansion of Federal Magistrate Judge Authority and Utilization in the Past Quarter Century","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Magistrate; Quarter (Canadian coin); Nothing; Law; Political science; History; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.035431519248789504,"score_gpt":0.29144868862936835,"score_spread":0.25601716938057884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993495833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4955528,0.01786084,0.0014897535,0.36162853,0.0015275698,0.000023071136,0.00037331975,0.00005619044,0.12148793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9666705,0.002136733,0.0004488405,0.020721063,0.0008955638,0.000016047748,0.00004243069,0.000022217051,0.009046612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943606,0.0019508358,0.00030449606,0.0007074177,0.0011433939,0.0015331882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99000216,0.0038265234,0.0021299566,0.000508645,0.0021102433,0.0014224312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006475461,0.0000960153,0.00024215986,0.0014402734,0.0062346854,0.004576036,0.0010883564,0.0054450845,0.003776793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017424924,0.0003511317,0.00027100084,0.0021301312,0.010309672,0.0032487293,0.0031871186,0.0057237083,0.00030141074],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015955843,0.000113316215,0.031728763,0.00015088878,0.00001649555,0.0003823908,0.042996738,0.00043819085,0.0007894039,0.7633987,0.06651605,0.093309484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004154899,0.00010458273,0.23494656,0.0005808337,0.000028164843,0.00050582964,0.020423323,0.0008121836,0.0010732746,0.042259477,0.6991266,0.00009777987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.096248694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22104312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096248694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011704643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014900245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19137692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993727139","doi":"","title":"Evolution, Child Abuse and the Constitution","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Plaintiff; Scrutiny; Equal Protection Clause; Law; Constitution; Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Supreme court; Criminology; Wrongful death; Sentence; Political science; Damages","score_opus":0.010145256629287233,"score_gpt":0.24806300294556796,"score_spread":0.23791774631628074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993727139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017321005,0.04823708,0.000396369,0.047619358,0.0012585629,0.00008560272,0.0022831997,0.00006893897,0.8827299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37731835,0.036181837,0.00081359677,0.04744917,0.001660764,0.0008077281,0.0020156214,0.000096760334,0.5336561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886715,0.0002498886,0.000068824374,0.00016620125,0.0002305905,0.00041727477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994677,0.00017965297,0.00009161829,0.000059011785,0.00010834828,0.00009372042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011659951,0.00040359292,0.00033697434,0.001103323,0.0055990983,0.0044357968,0.00067422877,0.0037021667,0.033911716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023875297,0.0004702998,0.00025831014,0.0017194942,0.0028740335,0.0019296566,0.003053308,0.0045393924,0.003764414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019113335,0.000026610389,0.0032027438,0.000053827305,0.000009422077,0.00033543588,0.0025825321,0.00008195576,0.00012559499,0.7111633,0.2509453,0.031454213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008711402,0.000012312516,0.010230157,0.0003767991,0.000008772529,0.00013591495,0.0012717152,0.000049876107,0.000048261845,0.018760202,0.96908283,0.000014386088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10206297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16204235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10206297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049319277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048292154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20293778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994487570","doi":"","title":"Panel 2: How Are Laws Applied and Detention Practices Reformed?Litigation: Taking Cases and Those Responsible to Court","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Torture; Interrogation; Law; Accountability; Political science; Administration (probate law); Acknowledgement; Human rights; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Computer security","score_opus":0.08251636393225717,"score_gpt":0.33531091775036204,"score_spread":0.2527945538181049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994487570","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002536521,0.0015257493,0.0004896131,0.92528194,0.004401932,0.00021210876,0.00041386136,0.00006151561,0.06507677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035640113,0.0028243859,0.0014057934,0.7948262,0.004935712,0.0006664562,0.0005646205,0.00011890687,0.1590178],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922963,0.0016903116,0.00032548147,0.0010124895,0.0019729997,0.0027023715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98220587,0.005178119,0.0007675985,0.0006255727,0.0063222433,0.0049004573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011197121,0.00067500124,0.00060171145,0.00091096264,0.018032767,0.013916945,0.0028574835,0.038632184,0.059987035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02470303,0.00060466613,0.0009938149,0.0010097966,0.0048600202,0.01275592,0.005156068,0.023515573,0.019594224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001614815,0.00004848723,0.00068170537,0.00006138152,0.0000032939945,0.00013292742,0.0008504399,0.000050291717,0.0002972634,0.0076281917,0.9836178,0.00661204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054759417,0.000051659405,0.006916281,0.00060993514,0.000020333595,0.00017628678,0.008648724,0.00017909962,0.0006462752,0.011996037,0.97062254,0.00007811258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04106339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10399949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059987035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0092611415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03091748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20067662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995404007","doi":"","title":"Leadership and Strategic Change on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08909117494085535,"score_gpt":0.22693483992413196,"score_spread":0.1378436649832766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995404007","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6334826,0.0037411414,0.0004984776,0.061782405,0.00046428497,0.00007638809,0.0005645581,0.000050971063,0.29933912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974872,0.001184784,0.00016570037,0.002209072,0.00002808177,0.000008204091,0.00010479045,0.000013851831,0.02141344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99553937,0.000314683,0.00003937184,0.00028571204,0.0013328224,0.0024879226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99507964,0.00037988863,0.00022557659,0.000066947294,0.0022907332,0.0019571716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014832853,0.00025062176,0.00029013705,0.0016360264,0.027865035,0.006326232,0.0011973201,0.0013282197,0.0055899834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006648563,0.00023636332,0.00026589012,0.0027544731,0.0064975526,0.0011954916,0.0027568687,0.00331704,0.0003261897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020685176,0.00021881933,0.13814954,0.00016674431,0.000119087716,0.002155964,0.12373887,0.0029929471,0.0023137077,0.36897537,0.21849887,0.1424633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000495835,0.00009511923,0.36455613,0.00032707545,0.00007266773,0.00029968313,0.17086282,0.002566764,0.0013870395,0.01921315,0.4403035,0.0002664776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99911815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8235276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17647241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22123267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9551753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996329874","doi":"","title":"‘Kell v Canada: Revaluating the CEDAW Decision in a Feminist Light’","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Gender studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.03381194680904793,"score_gpt":0.2695996113370498,"score_spread":0.23578766452800187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996329874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018033788,0.013294003,0.0015923355,0.32934007,0.003240326,0.00013415665,0.0005267004,0.00009352424,0.6337451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20440906,0.0037089344,0.0011804753,0.27372348,0.00090278586,0.0001366878,0.00014281846,0.00024255343,0.51555324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98917925,0.0013925801,0.00017209898,0.0009399472,0.0036163263,0.004699887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951283,0.0024411166,0.00016995797,0.00021026698,0.0014708588,0.0005794594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006040979,0.00075360446,0.0007879955,0.0020409613,0.02732945,0.020177666,0.0049380227,0.035270795,0.014874008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021247214,0.0010563768,0.0007335938,0.0031855453,0.025030633,0.0074843345,0.004969372,0.023045149,0.0015830864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002700098,0.000016161337,0.00031644237,0.000046225512,0.000009435648,0.00018362224,0.0071453727,0.00014452217,0.00017035875,0.7314334,0.25295684,0.0075505245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048303216,0.0000138062005,0.0018359169,0.000345511,0.00003578628,0.000076921344,0.009834019,0.00028978114,0.0006822901,0.07224768,0.91446614,0.00012389301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97887087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99128824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090057544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.090057544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2006104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6534163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004006291","doi":"10.11575/prism/34532","title":"Parenting Assessments and Their Use in Family Law Disputes in Alberta, British Columbia and Ontario","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child custody; Law; Family law; Political science; Criminology; Geography; Psychology","score_opus":0.06332613530043898,"score_gpt":0.33627959105203303,"score_spread":0.272953455751594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004006291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9570821,0.0025304644,0.00046048625,0.0054265605,0.000060552316,0.00012810432,0.00027200163,0.000023196397,0.0340165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929501,0.0013852792,0.00065791816,0.0004717236,0.000013393808,0.0000300154,0.000100961624,0.000010391957,0.0043802545],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98889065,0.0030583635,0.00067817146,0.00061047333,0.0049519297,0.0018104037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9586664,0.015692607,0.0067952136,0.0011596406,0.012579577,0.00510659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009095973,0.00017226496,0.0002721014,0.0037025674,0.010617771,0.0037774318,0.0025318025,0.0009955704,0.002946035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037829988,0.00040362732,0.00018055971,0.0049567414,0.0061192713,0.0009853706,0.0029114462,0.0015975297,0.00013486668],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019264984,0.00021752714,0.550199,0.0003096525,0.000050941544,0.0047554257,0.24167076,0.001176634,0.0012532546,0.02249826,0.015938584,0.16173728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028962448,0.00008428565,0.7886751,0.0006032983,0.000034601948,0.0011751945,0.16897759,0.001131634,0.00048449807,0.0015517378,0.03714056,0.000112593014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9890343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99648714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083367646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.083367646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09946734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6048775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005981645","doi":"","title":"Robots, Regulation, and the Changing Nature of Public Spaces","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Robot; Public space; Commercialization; Space (punctuation); Robotics; Business; Political science; Engineering; Public relations; Computer security; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Law; Architectural engineering","score_opus":0.012311811127671527,"score_gpt":0.2593195108787194,"score_spread":0.2470076997510479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005981645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.119670026,0.008952636,0.037244,0.16169196,0.0014603046,0.0000851531,0.00014104434,0.0002014251,0.6705535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9605046,0.002272302,0.0025921664,0.011083482,0.0005431471,0.00010617426,0.00003798903,0.00007623925,0.022783874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98759705,0.0048139617,0.00040019955,0.002127345,0.003144711,0.0019167856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98692757,0.0057565896,0.0023524375,0.0016062123,0.0022552835,0.0011019083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069357017,0.00026327345,0.00036277226,0.0012741097,0.008847071,0.0153475255,0.0018474524,0.0061982716,0.0062581035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011587194,0.00050637405,0.00079442334,0.0011328259,0.056252327,0.013872302,0.008343282,0.006263384,0.00082576135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010716946,0.00002288985,0.001996235,0.00003877989,0.0000061419473,0.00012082579,0.010942039,0.0004265333,0.00015805826,0.9723583,0.0054557687,0.008463735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023290766,0.00005620888,0.008718771,0.00057902536,0.000022142163,0.00027128798,0.028656032,0.0011289364,0.000701878,0.39607593,0.5636585,0.00010798008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028907554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026143694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028907554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009584235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062064193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06953883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006231166","doi":"","title":"Avro Canada Orenda","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Alphascript Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Geology","score_opus":0.0176221467649386,"score_gpt":0.24296944119482286,"score_spread":0.22534729442988427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006231166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004663162,0.0021271096,0.0002889418,0.00078407367,0.0004829089,0.000018198869,0.0011807295,0.00024440527,0.9944073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00061971514,0.00052624394,0.00016237255,0.0000637133,0.000017185906,0.0000043087457,0.00029567833,0.00009882735,0.998212],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922955,0.00002845976,0.000018098632,0.00017065373,0.0004103546,0.0001428661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993298,0.000089527915,0.0000295856,0.00008454438,0.00035584162,0.00011073877],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045353075,0.0013817792,0.0011866558,0.0022834134,0.004308142,0.00535908,0.0013621314,0.0023474926,0.6579977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014109846,0.0008153054,0.0006678047,0.0034100749,0.0008949417,0.0024586597,0.002326662,0.0021777495,0.39233664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011925517,0.000045821747,0.00031291807,0.0002774083,0.000009815301,0.00023922302,0.00015541975,0.00028602278,0.0005756438,0.026484212,0.73070747,0.24078692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007419762,0.0000063558464,0.0002903064,0.00010299782,0.0000035592052,0.00006106325,0.00009932209,0.00009139061,0.00014755472,0.0012488303,0.9979361,0.000005126062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18299034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4724028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8170097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049990863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008311906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48782474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006632041","doi":"","title":"You Made Gideon a Promise, Eh?: Advocating for Mandated Publicly Appointed Counsel at Bail Hearings in the United States Through Domestic Comparisons with Canadian Practices and Legal Considerations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.031388970557142244,"score_gpt":0.3066943899697634,"score_spread":0.27530541941262116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006632041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49880403,0.002967856,0.0006310613,0.3013322,0.0005398819,0.0000958253,0.00022496957,0.000032280786,0.19537185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9429938,0.0009114218,0.00035445474,0.04036351,0.000057042274,0.00003186802,0.000036446734,0.000020778092,0.015230734],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885699,0.002548975,0.00016784991,0.0006231368,0.0023172577,0.00577289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98417294,0.006874035,0.0011297427,0.0002996016,0.0033300375,0.0041935905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011040049,0.00022247042,0.00032419685,0.0015921376,0.040976208,0.011834225,0.0033174958,0.009272283,0.0061205444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036087137,0.00055099564,0.00025791442,0.002340886,0.011320216,0.0035835975,0.0047745854,0.011362336,0.00036856995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022901534,0.0003397921,0.089351885,0.00015927955,0.000043346055,0.0017178076,0.40179652,0.00042520967,0.0014084503,0.27813587,0.14673734,0.07965552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006163457,0.000074081065,0.07131039,0.000621867,0.00011540886,0.0003249252,0.6929643,0.0006308623,0.0010719618,0.008687292,0.22399308,0.0001442007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97036785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9916515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07247689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07247689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1608032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5258591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011027392","doi":"","title":"Welcomed Participants' or 'Environmental Vigilantes'?The CEPA Environmental Protection Action and theRole Of Citizen Suits in Federal Environmental Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Action (physics); Political science; Environmental law; Environmental protection; Geography","score_opus":0.051198315684278316,"score_gpt":0.2692325831660606,"score_spread":0.21803426748178226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011027392","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11947832,0.0013441036,0.0046625915,0.54760754,0.0038323523,0.00015669098,0.000101074525,0.00007903617,0.32273838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87138236,0.00028009014,0.00060552167,0.07148421,0.00088201324,0.00018411412,0.000016183087,0.00006468847,0.055100895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97349066,0.014187192,0.00046761733,0.0025007706,0.002397933,0.006955836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9635381,0.023808945,0.0024182498,0.0019191602,0.003432139,0.0048834947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03578508,0.00044320873,0.0007750301,0.0009984691,0.029091539,0.022507943,0.0035183993,0.041796096,0.016565142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08773917,0.00093388575,0.0005297551,0.0011240552,0.021887926,0.022295883,0.0088606365,0.02365191,0.0010800713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062936124,0.00008901838,0.0020930718,0.000055329252,0.000014484256,0.0006367788,0.06700393,0.00007009598,0.00030013063,0.8469314,0.06949911,0.013243736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000135423,0.00016347288,0.010128361,0.00062418217,0.000103774604,0.0004073268,0.2515358,0.00058783405,0.0012407764,0.27478558,0.46010426,0.00018313246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044321463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.105388366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9556785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008911216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016592687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18925184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011030870","doi":"10.1525/fsr.2020.32.3.125","title":"Looking Backward and Moving Forward","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Sentencing Reporter","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legislature; Law; Context (archaeology); Criminal justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Quarter (Canadian coin); Order (exchange); Sentencing guidelines; Sociology; History; Sentence","score_opus":0.026084565107569957,"score_gpt":0.2779666017560384,"score_spread":0.2518820366484684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011030870","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016518761,0.012302604,0.003060146,0.8894835,0.024369463,0.000016537006,0.00011991735,0.00017313396,0.06882279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12994552,0.027234657,0.008897801,0.6757188,0.017466264,0.00014491017,0.00039155904,0.00081858283,0.13938197],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846336,0.0072092307,0.00038607203,0.0021569678,0.0032212646,0.0023927551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813456,0.006739776,0.00070344127,0.0016405075,0.005706211,0.0038645263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015905594,0.0013240348,0.0010596138,0.002586541,0.01485768,0.022027548,0.0033458602,0.016651714,0.049697388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03136975,0.00049495674,0.0009498667,0.0016030585,0.025473978,0.041972186,0.011832218,0.03821902,0.017856656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035797722,0.000058918456,0.0005433652,0.00018504956,0.00001563344,0.00025534598,0.007253594,0.00014257389,0.00019784688,0.42020002,0.53174216,0.039369572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008522333,0.00002622023,0.00015891482,0.00079541723,0.00001157824,0.00013041108,0.008174136,0.00014570304,0.00024096758,0.16093157,0.8293404,0.000036120928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011868948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012459206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049697388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011348626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019988673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16625434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011774774","doi":"","title":"Walking the Centre Line: Balancing an Employee's Right to Privacy in Drug andAlcohol Policies in the Atlantic Offshore Oil Industry","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Right whale; Petroleum industry; Line (geometry); Business; Right to privacy; Submarine pipeline; Internet privacy; Law; Engineering; Political science; Computer science; Fishery","score_opus":0.018885409040244484,"score_gpt":0.29919442617670855,"score_spread":0.28030901713646406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011774774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5728845,0.00050091173,0.0037403973,0.23551856,0.00019319421,0.000078351,0.00005007176,0.00001990923,0.18701407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779228,0.0001612514,0.0005372187,0.011175286,0.000053140695,0.000020720665,0.0000056429526,0.000008681013,0.010115174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887311,0.0043705306,0.00032592527,0.0006375078,0.0013705736,0.004564396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776808,0.016183252,0.0012077483,0.00086418766,0.0016672347,0.002396714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015299608,0.00020130664,0.00037501918,0.0008493966,0.025542594,0.0136925755,0.002132275,0.022063864,0.007283104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031421125,0.0004621831,0.0005695373,0.00082461763,0.020079533,0.007394694,0.0076219533,0.012514548,0.0004642606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023486707,0.0002142882,0.016153615,0.000050916504,0.000032755594,0.0017131658,0.07871493,0.0009103462,0.00091698545,0.85967076,0.01951262,0.021874752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022918399,0.00024717205,0.02447575,0.0006223412,0.00023185823,0.0006672765,0.32002893,0.0039063985,0.0037588198,0.48615712,0.15940146,0.00027378666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20264801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31961766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20264801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012114735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039706256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40293694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016750273","doi":"","title":"Patient v. God: Determining the Standard of Care for Christian Science Practitioners in Medical Negligence Cases","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medical negligence; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.034342414452244195,"score_gpt":0.3832997399443293,"score_spread":0.34895732549208514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016750273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8538757,0.0008451864,0.007055887,0.08960894,0.00035226683,0.00045615245,0.0001988712,0.00004986272,0.047557093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99194384,0.00007504097,0.0029909417,0.0043710107,0.00004170418,0.00006687573,0.000021282258,0.000007003908,0.00048226328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9497349,0.027407372,0.005735918,0.0022347786,0.009408313,0.005478651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89035267,0.08117641,0.0099894265,0.0027066027,0.008770306,0.0070045646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05832309,0.0002584013,0.0007115446,0.0030477815,0.007851598,0.0070062433,0.0030779324,0.012126239,0.003240154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19719896,0.00063166925,0.00087098964,0.001338242,0.007312415,0.0049337912,0.0063187904,0.008387383,0.000330233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029006556,0.00094919134,0.331007,0.0004630867,0.0003388706,0.0064770575,0.043824855,0.0045350576,0.0028566658,0.46003,0.037463147,0.109154336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001209556,0.0039940104,0.4758847,0.0042563705,0.0010838978,0.0078078946,0.11772574,0.03265071,0.01480906,0.28345403,0.05617754,0.0009464074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018199539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04275792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05832309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008823878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03138608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30844563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3017116148","doi":"","title":"製薬業界におけるデータ保護 : 日本とカナダの比較研究 = The pharmaceutical industry in the Great White North and Land of the Rising Sun : a comparison of regulatory data protection in Canada and Japan","year":2004,"lang":"ja","type":"book","venue":"知的財産研究所 eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); Pharmaceutical industry; White paper; Business; International trade; Natural resource economics; Environmental protection; Geography; Political science; Economics; Law; Biotechnology; Biology","score_opus":0.07415641562206027,"score_gpt":0.3101240314112957,"score_spread":0.23596761578923542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3017116148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024136348,0.022122957,0.019832572,0.042665966,0.00087125285,0.00006253637,0.0003169886,0.00011327374,0.88987803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5696297,0.015486682,0.021793975,0.007556903,0.00068204704,0.00011365445,0.00021275863,0.00015857247,0.38436577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959403,0.000087707675,0.000011170119,0.00006082696,0.00018273645,0.00006343748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991905,0.00047339822,0.000044273052,0.00003076518,0.0002055354,0.000055394066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008672258,0.00024463926,0.0001142987,0.00055814494,0.0022071283,0.003358533,0.0005196292,0.0009339832,0.006066641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017057338,0.00016198633,0.00012756234,0.0010777208,0.0070219855,0.0021255598,0.0004193456,0.0014354795,0.0010462477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009577394,0.000017079788,0.00042754607,0.00006298491,0.0000032829364,0.000101676385,0.0042317114,0.00036747305,0.00036438985,0.8913083,0.061654106,0.041451883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009004448,0.000013986625,0.0033726292,0.00013630462,0.000010048177,0.00020268348,0.0036374184,0.0010714784,0.0009306601,0.44412825,0.5464671,0.000020426389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1540292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28199604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8459708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062370785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008152361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3062653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3029923822","doi":"","title":"Issuance of the Keystone XL Permit: Presidential Prerogative or Presidential “Chutzpah”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Presidential system; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.027829896464397277,"score_gpt":0.2969604624097633,"score_spread":0.26913056594536605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3029923822","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02729895,0.004016006,0.004064279,0.05520189,0.005091435,0.00012984301,0.0002217685,0.00029330057,0.9036825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5655589,0.0022560228,0.0022992643,0.039826516,0.0024785597,0.00021074187,0.00013718873,0.00019024186,0.3870425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964874,0.0009590479,0.00018915127,0.0005743684,0.0007979454,0.0009922194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965821,0.0015028785,0.00040115454,0.00037659812,0.00077373465,0.00036350725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028696859,0.00041013185,0.00022214912,0.00036893028,0.005062976,0.0064802608,0.00083273026,0.0055794124,0.018422281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008650693,0.00034772052,0.00020229274,0.0004747239,0.004094464,0.0037031989,0.0019825592,0.0044068336,0.005716849],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068741036,0.00002848431,0.0016145188,0.00012745977,0.000008624668,0.00039486156,0.0031056388,0.00008042675,0.0014122935,0.61077195,0.35494444,0.027442684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012768031,0.00005796355,0.002222856,0.00008952835,0.000010293026,0.00018815669,0.0016770327,0.00014329939,0.0016032847,0.009757885,0.9842056,0.00003118914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008290003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01778223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031693564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055116494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06162864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033892577","doi":"","title":"With a Little Help from Too Many Friends? Lessons from TWU and Comeau on Intervening Before the Supreme Court","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Viewpoints; Supreme court; Intervention (counseling); Framing (construction); Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.011809589367994755,"score_gpt":0.27187720250325476,"score_spread":0.26006761313526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033892577","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021558244,0.015508552,0.0012448808,0.7710375,0.0012601763,0.00004155787,0.000054679324,0.000058529407,0.18923587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7251005,0.007742913,0.0013058773,0.22044283,0.00095267757,0.0000880729,0.000047991245,0.00014843584,0.0441707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98329264,0.005622833,0.0002222279,0.0013377655,0.003548208,0.0059763137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9750199,0.013191513,0.0006164318,0.0006068101,0.0038138505,0.006751523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0116448635,0.0006426083,0.0013365225,0.0019420054,0.058162004,0.030925931,0.005193306,0.02219232,0.00814969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028453225,0.0006623208,0.00053295755,0.0018545107,0.050397296,0.014841909,0.008430319,0.024078095,0.0013571306],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052499494,0.00010248284,0.002106402,0.000105474544,0.000029758294,0.0013775326,0.101340294,0.00017840609,0.00012697047,0.6480165,0.22158358,0.024980148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007237646,0.000043722564,0.004123065,0.0013534129,0.00006092013,0.0004667424,0.15671891,0.0006515516,0.00032082485,0.26895827,0.5670903,0.00013985297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8710666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93060434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12893343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08302763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12770094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60241044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034608992","doi":"10.12927/hcpol.2020.26229","title":"The Courts and Two-Tier Medicare","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Healthcare policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Health care; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.0472190968272542,"score_gpt":0.3788073601656157,"score_spread":0.33158826333836156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034608992","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08511466,0.0064137657,0.004699263,0.4055892,0.0010612038,0.00015366203,0.00040168923,0.00009623539,0.4964704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90245694,0.0013638722,0.0017757418,0.04165339,0.0005046234,0.000084281055,0.00009311109,0.000036533973,0.05203143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9789917,0.0047165165,0.00041398095,0.0016911376,0.0063607427,0.007825911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852271,0.0055928566,0.0009134755,0.001101771,0.004064269,0.0031004262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013662534,0.00036623116,0.0004886155,0.0017145217,0.023312228,0.017053852,0.0025340288,0.010425552,0.0101362085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029639361,0.00051905715,0.00067424384,0.0013026736,0.02398253,0.0052252933,0.0056701824,0.010911149,0.000683112],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009869693,0.000010828413,0.0005091513,0.000008293403,0.0000050030435,0.000063575695,0.0011385299,0.00015113612,0.00004455147,0.9855084,0.009832608,0.0027180074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012979888,0.000053109976,0.007666016,0.00040739728,0.000074239906,0.00015245611,0.007317562,0.003763532,0.0005551874,0.73174095,0.2479918,0.00014787648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7617597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8018469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7617597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07333558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12655221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53208935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W303835224","doi":"","title":"投資協定仲裁判断例研究(18)最近の仲裁人忌避申立てに対する判断--Vito G. Gallo v Government of Canada事件における忌避申立てに対する決定(Decision on the Challenge to Mr. J. Christopher Thomas, QC)","year":2010,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"JCAジャーナル","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023330159080194247,"score_gpt":0.2812254961925654,"score_spread":0.25789533711237117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W303835224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051578753,0.0065005072,0.0033277182,0.14055662,0.0015303467,0.00020505086,0.0012536175,0.000085270374,0.7949621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.569464,0.0036345534,0.0046488047,0.061248083,0.0011508523,0.00018827729,0.00035361838,0.00006479011,0.35924697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972313,0.0002617575,0.00012595968,0.00032383925,0.0012811511,0.00077595696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976355,0.00043498666,0.00019354277,0.00006875223,0.0014586515,0.00020867554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025718955,0.00040509482,0.0002638298,0.0010311012,0.006903276,0.0042361612,0.0010147832,0.006454591,0.009616924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049955444,0.000357999,0.0005257359,0.00081777346,0.009212116,0.0016843636,0.0010303687,0.004955269,0.00197327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050585946,0.00002592039,0.0038720623,0.00009802256,0.00002224117,0.0003755482,0.0057757283,0.00013773693,0.0011247278,0.86775637,0.10622086,0.014540139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053632855,0.00006132908,0.011828454,0.00025906443,0.00008097168,0.0002765132,0.0032040337,0.00029513772,0.0023231145,0.09038798,0.8911595,0.00007022461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5184935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71109605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48150653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014056515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019532217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96868443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039067449","doi":"","title":"Book Review: A Parent-Partner Status for American Family Law by Merle H. Weiner","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Psychology; Genealogy; Political science; History","score_opus":0.039273711452433996,"score_gpt":0.3395010143025037,"score_spread":0.3002273028500697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039067449","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042559247,0.18380179,0.00032981986,0.54092443,0.23484552,0.00010941258,0.00040272542,0.00006890798,0.039091773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010788219,0.21686694,0.00059519423,0.34528068,0.21302268,0.00024762313,0.00056880614,0.00017802285,0.2124518],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976572,0.000592128,0.00018717384,0.00023825173,0.0011741032,0.00015110329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818971,0.009525544,0.00066182006,0.00033751404,0.006437816,0.001140273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029703449,0.0007495218,0.0011773428,0.0027913887,0.0022367418,0.0036257398,0.001942634,0.007980834,0.020087091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022032326,0.00046606307,0.0005307351,0.0022692257,0.0021237491,0.0031610634,0.0013489345,0.007459238,0.00972155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028020768,0.000002622025,0.000029034869,0.000046591267,0.0000010434132,0.0000118584,0.0000070665233,0.000007965636,0.000004947259,0.00045906927,0.9946385,0.0047885156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010830667,0.000010848468,0.0006119045,0.00084731524,0.000009457953,0.00012025413,0.00007789147,0.000036383433,0.000022979833,0.001082618,0.9971578,0.000011716843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02247034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.069929786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02247034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049991957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008053701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06719804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039642515","doi":"","title":"A Feminist Critique of Quebec v. A. : Evaluating the Supreme Court's Divided Opinion on Section 15 and Common Law Support Obligations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Law; Supreme court; Political science; Common law; Majority opinion; Business","score_opus":0.08359551058275173,"score_gpt":0.3771282442904529,"score_spread":0.29353273370770117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039642515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057015423,0.0071127503,0.003268835,0.4586484,0.0012277863,0.000074850854,0.00072021916,0.000054529257,0.4718773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8534957,0.0017691038,0.0012985738,0.087736204,0.0005508782,0.00008867927,0.00007545458,0.00006806191,0.054917384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897572,0.00341593,0.00015096799,0.00080136757,0.0030144344,0.0028599703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849635,0.008757994,0.0004840555,0.00037581005,0.004558267,0.00086040475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011505003,0.0006580684,0.00089584646,0.0025810688,0.029139437,0.010583787,0.0049051726,0.016572671,0.009102972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021040106,0.0005606036,0.00083332043,0.0027259416,0.031715367,0.0043182946,0.0031005368,0.0138718,0.00059029367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035812584,0.000011003686,0.0009426171,0.00004325131,0.000015769028,0.00034226698,0.014299006,0.00034047558,0.00014464742,0.9023742,0.07674757,0.0047032842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017068042,0.000058247017,0.016481368,0.0016918228,0.00020490441,0.0003412241,0.053715944,0.002824063,0.0014505739,0.306506,0.6162459,0.0003091438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9671414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98281604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09814912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09814912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08953458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71212506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3040664743","doi":"","title":"Family Violence and Evolving Judicial Roles: Judges as Equality Guardians in Family Law Cases","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Family law; Political science; Domestic violence; Sociology; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine; Poison control; Environmental health","score_opus":0.03198261990149851,"score_gpt":0.31997426403961426,"score_spread":0.28799164413811573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3040664743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6934989,0.011912966,0.004950364,0.110289015,0.00073010044,0.00013792397,0.000037390266,0.000030560204,0.1784128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938862,0.0008006635,0.00037265892,0.0026061079,0.00008719471,0.000022578473,0.0000052177406,0.00000715342,0.0022122518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9435057,0.03999187,0.0011072867,0.0021031315,0.0042468277,0.009045197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96834534,0.017446144,0.0033369665,0.00079551945,0.0030518726,0.0070241583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029066134,0.00021023602,0.00032611942,0.0025375723,0.02234476,0.014951088,0.0026933698,0.0053833346,0.003603596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.077703424,0.00063499005,0.0003806422,0.0015370138,0.028040016,0.009114907,0.011728501,0.00660619,0.00024366063],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009085821,0.00018040075,0.03902696,0.000093794224,0.000019405026,0.0045551704,0.3857534,0.00041287843,0.00040251945,0.52216107,0.009917016,0.037386626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013129628,0.00018333938,0.05911857,0.0011977721,0.00005115914,0.0019823024,0.6539525,0.0014466221,0.00084402284,0.18528606,0.095609225,0.00019727302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.091703765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19914374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091703765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018973865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02016971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18233997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041055734","doi":"","title":"The Suicide Clause","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian military history","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dependent clause; Computer science; Natural language processing","score_opus":0.04223727702105613,"score_gpt":0.24411578007356782,"score_spread":0.2018785030525117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3041055734","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0052939216,0.0029903841,0.0003893319,0.032198243,0.001061957,0.000038547645,0.0003317233,0.000027986376,0.95766795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18265456,0.0018763125,0.00036609356,0.02872116,0.00053800386,0.00007101728,0.00030438017,0.00006500141,0.7854035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996558,0.00035772493,0.00006709415,0.00031449384,0.0014119134,0.0012906746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830025,0.00029781088,0.000058787136,0.00014327287,0.0009336313,0.00026624431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018046191,0.00053395284,0.00043885538,0.0014228108,0.01708349,0.008875893,0.0017322272,0.0065126005,0.0276765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006900312,0.00033508072,0.00043943204,0.0019106932,0.009196722,0.002297771,0.0021908393,0.009481032,0.0037723694],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007897963,0.0000068438308,0.00018891173,0.000011168025,0.0000022078793,0.000047981135,0.001463589,0.000033594697,0.00003329755,0.8410776,0.15121388,0.0059129694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012904716,0.0000065638155,0.0017270724,0.00010799897,0.000008451682,0.000056607572,0.0026330014,0.000085432424,0.00013243823,0.062482305,0.93272823,0.000018979035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8808178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92191875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11918223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029903356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05326418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2397682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3047249928","doi":"","title":"The Detention of Huawei’s CFO is Legally Justified. Why Doesn’t the U.S. Say So?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law; Computer science; Computer security; Political science","score_opus":0.017959887433916036,"score_gpt":0.2834534215149981,"score_spread":0.26549353408108206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3047249928","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09621755,0.0036542173,0.0024151867,0.55157787,0.0030135869,0.00009257711,0.00032305435,0.00017842322,0.34252745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6825729,0.0011554084,0.0015114472,0.21815224,0.0005399572,0.000064718806,0.00015869051,0.00003786946,0.09580684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961976,0.0005469548,0.00016194911,0.00044655713,0.0011705896,0.0014763174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99563414,0.0012446119,0.00043704698,0.00022935348,0.0016964002,0.0007584829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044227056,0.00033034352,0.00029307316,0.0007965732,0.015887212,0.0044463654,0.0008592882,0.010672842,0.007859465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014491385,0.00041833843,0.00038835162,0.0006643698,0.0070930524,0.0031018343,0.0019112318,0.008484498,0.0011893575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006201182,0.00009765417,0.014866333,0.000090478534,0.00004840391,0.0011875584,0.009221821,0.00011353162,0.0022507976,0.48930603,0.4357262,0.0470291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005816087,0.00011420048,0.03224478,0.00046113165,0.00008592882,0.00045480847,0.010724911,0.000999633,0.0037185561,0.04126478,0.909683,0.0001901722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33967522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42834502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33967522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070455046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019427214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6753962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049431473","doi":"","title":"Gender-Identity Protection, Trade, and the Trump Administration: A Tale of Reluctant Progressivism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Sexual orientation; Political science; Inclusion (mineral); Identity (music); Negotiation; Law; Business; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.013626673808079394,"score_gpt":0.2765362668559764,"score_spread":0.26290959304789696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049431473","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04130503,0.011276189,0.010660848,0.5657975,0.004050863,0.000056081426,0.000034032302,0.00012412982,0.3666954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8063779,0.0052814293,0.005262666,0.10898908,0.0028843535,0.00021571803,0.000034633584,0.00030914153,0.07064514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97673076,0.013445361,0.00070396124,0.002363661,0.0047562798,0.001999996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98427457,0.011406475,0.00089871045,0.0013252927,0.0013885564,0.000706411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024165507,0.00065886066,0.0006000984,0.0016847984,0.018689334,0.020232206,0.0022769936,0.014209368,0.003071799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02605336,0.0005641677,0.0007396198,0.0014172635,0.089880764,0.018235052,0.0104360655,0.034612894,0.00076792546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032718738,0.000006524875,0.000059793136,0.000008995925,7.6655914e-7,0.00002429743,0.009136169,0.000022096032,0.00002810086,0.98306596,0.0057015964,0.0019423835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001528134,0.000036280846,0.00029041996,0.00044519556,0.000006103237,0.00012509762,0.020128205,0.00029220912,0.00032959587,0.48654363,0.491751,0.000036965917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012833755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010419489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024165507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013836452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013894995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12780094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082070622","doi":"","title":"RETHINKING CANADA’S DUTY TO CONSULT DOCTRINE: ACCOMMODATING ABORIGINAL RIGHTS IN THE DEPLOYMENT OF SMALL MODULAR REACTORS (SMRs)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"University Library (University of Saskatchewan)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Software deployment; Doctrine; Modular design; Duty; Political science; Engineering; Business; Law; Computer science; Software engineering; Operating system","score_opus":0.011437777458544223,"score_gpt":0.21108788125937608,"score_spread":0.19965010380083187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082070622","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1471182,0.0032487037,0.026063798,0.16846748,0.0006655785,0.0002226175,0.0001231443,0.00014582761,0.65394473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9222145,0.0011749371,0.010957945,0.017767757,0.00007889373,0.00008585266,0.000028947668,0.00006186112,0.047629245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.990408,0.0022569068,0.0001785802,0.00078688335,0.0036144787,0.0027551723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941426,0.002564301,0.00023659805,0.00047499168,0.001886611,0.0006950224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00912133,0.00043112654,0.00027200623,0.0010488494,0.026138252,0.010896154,0.0039197467,0.007989631,0.0032437118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010948397,0.0005490805,0.00068243325,0.0010775437,0.028331567,0.0045632515,0.0065913014,0.0075240075,0.00034679458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014511991,0.000011595152,0.0018253126,0.000042380554,0.0000063733182,0.0007384998,0.029122427,0.00054804015,0.0007432457,0.9425882,0.013434736,0.010924754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066367385,0.000100971345,0.011268547,0.00081792806,0.00009811645,0.0008289822,0.071990035,0.004793928,0.0029485198,0.16935,0.7374736,0.00026302136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9376434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9762182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94282126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057178754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13821279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4148628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082890517","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: The Law of Canada: Home","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.12216481619010341,"score_gpt":0.3939349046415186,"score_spread":0.27177008845141515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082890517","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034926627,0.024383157,0.0014705507,0.039356634,0.0021601953,0.0006475791,0.07475017,0.0009990341,0.8527401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018545432,0.011885617,0.0019464322,0.00407878,0.00037207498,0.00043087365,0.009574066,0.00038477787,0.952782],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759054,0.00025472004,0.00013559428,0.0002417453,0.0013643709,0.00041302168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894601,0.0019414494,0.0002482525,0.0003238404,0.007213531,0.0008127592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025446597,0.0009888813,0.00089332263,0.007286925,0.010177903,0.011033237,0.0024077215,0.0058249864,0.18098898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011186151,0.0008565538,0.0005041956,0.017918603,0.0027659526,0.0038868464,0.0014142577,0.0037895346,0.018132983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010204713,0.000021233125,0.00042783713,0.00018811498,0.0000026932535,0.000026803993,0.000612685,0.00011334063,0.000022861539,0.027852986,0.9485721,0.022149215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013378009,0.000006457458,0.005001083,0.0005622549,0.000010089838,0.000016496931,0.0020533027,0.00014507385,0.00009793158,0.004695635,0.9873706,0.00002768366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9841733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99398357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18098898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.070073426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20949684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60546845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093684030","doi":"","title":"The Texas Lawyer's Creed: Exploring Its Origin and Impact over the Last Quarter Century","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Creed; Quarter (Canadian coin); History; Political science; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.08685444479715995,"score_gpt":0.37724065610406987,"score_spread":0.2903862113069099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093684030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6371744,0.027810141,0.0010320226,0.18420859,0.0026281036,0.00006360111,0.00050755823,0.00004278793,0.14653273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9436942,0.010488075,0.00044814797,0.0077521284,0.0010641342,0.00003247291,0.000102530445,0.000046759207,0.03637158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982799,0.0004755768,0.000055954908,0.00034628378,0.00037339667,0.00046883948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900121,0.003945553,0.0020449702,0.00039338533,0.0017294303,0.0018745596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036534013,0.00019631663,0.0002739812,0.002834087,0.011761814,0.00996062,0.0011533634,0.0032291827,0.011944986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01093725,0.00028974065,0.00018046575,0.0028827186,0.015593856,0.004802306,0.004749519,0.0052630436,0.00065033475],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015999714,0.00021302588,0.042957064,0.0003616715,0.000030277213,0.0017126818,0.35246447,0.00026317607,0.0005598858,0.41589195,0.06818232,0.117203504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016051577,0.00012006271,0.0712147,0.0010481384,0.000022686578,0.00070614176,0.21102774,0.0002902254,0.00048005852,0.0073350533,0.70768887,0.000050197195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058553137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12429503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058553137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0129678035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014202731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11642462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3101647335","doi":"","title":"The Treatment of Transgender Prisoners, Not Just an American Problem--A Comparative Analysis of American, Australian, and Canadian Prison Policies Concerning the Treatment of Transgender Prisoners and a \"Universal\" Recommendation To Improve Treatment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & sexuality","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transgender; Prison; Criminology; Transgender Person; Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.07941484820139695,"score_gpt":0.36849445391128843,"score_spread":0.2890796057098915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3101647335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9273197,0.005580223,0.00032721373,0.048757855,0.00020439853,0.00006163721,0.000068131245,0.00001380874,0.01766707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892112,0.0031116577,0.00034632848,0.0054650526,0.00003622048,0.000029267749,0.000031609903,0.0000051827437,0.0017635509],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.994806,0.0021770361,0.0001882542,0.00015771961,0.001121507,0.0015495968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99079704,0.0026539105,0.0017379767,0.00027583807,0.0019481631,0.0025870844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052790274,0.00015214585,0.00027970597,0.0012246071,0.011936373,0.0024919286,0.0017284622,0.0015835486,0.0025537554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01737739,0.00023349555,0.0003631837,0.0016153697,0.0056094034,0.0011118111,0.0025349413,0.0031710183,0.00011178135],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007403385,0.0013835751,0.28913027,0.0010168264,0.00017184598,0.0013387969,0.22626112,0.001302141,0.004002912,0.15719056,0.040236864,0.27722478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013716967,0.0005146113,0.67833376,0.002269975,0.00026327762,0.0011262032,0.24850328,0.0010289031,0.0012123348,0.0068883877,0.05958389,0.00013816827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6882391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8962675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3117609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017583702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060129646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6271938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3102574423","doi":"10.11575/prism/32415","title":"Dividing Property and Allocating Debt Under British Columbia's Family Law Act: The Case Law to Date","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"BC Cancer Agency","keywords":"Law; Debt; Property (philosophy); Political science; Family law; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Finance","score_opus":0.06030970083077203,"score_gpt":0.3198359784500154,"score_spread":0.25952627761924335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3102574423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21166487,0.015598644,0.003755967,0.10792197,0.00092393695,0.00018998976,0.0011461017,0.00009019751,0.65870833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.854603,0.0040740194,0.0023433475,0.021005677,0.00012995407,0.000101487756,0.00021208037,0.00004274296,0.11748758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99519664,0.00080446334,0.00021783262,0.0004848695,0.0017428081,0.0015534709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99545765,0.0017631743,0.00025018543,0.0002680872,0.0016730095,0.0005879164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032589578,0.00024518705,0.00028825336,0.0015415032,0.0156301,0.00842945,0.0019925789,0.006647854,0.004330926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013121333,0.00046545308,0.00020256528,0.0025843754,0.010073797,0.0028900977,0.0018194718,0.0059610684,0.0005300243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003603115,0.000047320424,0.012430807,0.00009498812,0.000012592663,0.0011991361,0.01916585,0.00058761326,0.00045496784,0.8202276,0.11505932,0.030683737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004566269,0.000034414832,0.05262997,0.0014581534,0.00006886482,0.00093963137,0.029162737,0.0023891442,0.0014022008,0.092576444,0.8190202,0.00027251532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97617984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9903709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9241736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07582643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08694043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55016184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3102761468","doi":"","title":"Constitutionalism and the Genetic Non-Discrimination Act Reference","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Dissenting opinion; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Federalism; Context (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis); Genetic discrimination; Criminal justice; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.020028458104021474,"score_gpt":0.2781514681079943,"score_spread":0.2581230100039728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3102761468","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07030919,0.006000294,0.014011522,0.12518616,0.0020121932,0.00019987335,0.0003622022,0.00016320517,0.7817554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86954623,0.0011020637,0.003707573,0.04755731,0.00059609965,0.00020427971,0.00012965914,0.00006181643,0.077095024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98265725,0.003697854,0.0005811131,0.0029099053,0.0059273927,0.0042265006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943553,0.0025996536,0.0003037076,0.0006293121,0.0015406581,0.0005713966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012662039,0.00044634324,0.0005887785,0.0013318672,0.014936227,0.010957169,0.0024142873,0.011458428,0.0032437101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018147973,0.00054443453,0.0008967893,0.0013072909,0.029996885,0.0035264953,0.004021025,0.012531978,0.0006315429],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004173974,0.0000045630063,0.00012267039,0.000004999167,0.000002476089,0.00005110786,0.00064318377,0.0000723175,0.00010096299,0.9955492,0.0023551253,0.0010892882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085705295,0.00007911491,0.0035535276,0.00026971905,0.00006338603,0.00018873578,0.0019007326,0.0013947975,0.0012594913,0.6290183,0.36203936,0.00014715757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55189455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58755285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44810545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030983014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04383224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9014889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108428560","doi":"","title":"The Student Loan Bankruptcy Gap","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Student loan; Creditor; Debt; Loan; Business; Quarter (Canadian coin); Phenomenon; Actuarial science; Economics; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.031204617869714193,"score_gpt":0.3068233362966724,"score_spread":0.27561871842695823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108428560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9412717,0.003372738,0.0017181681,0.010158183,0.00012507578,0.00006085796,0.00674999,0.00010149754,0.036441736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99367976,0.00079373614,0.0002716368,0.0006547106,0.000076567696,0.00004741907,0.0024333033,0.000010284416,0.0020325663],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954861,0.0012448695,0.00043351066,0.0007316536,0.0014166085,0.00068723253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885089,0.0044985213,0.0036658496,0.0009579205,0.0012903636,0.0010784785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029988564,0.00012229149,0.00046576635,0.003015716,0.0017677929,0.00266423,0.00063451205,0.00064035517,0.008403603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019364852,0.00013954051,0.00015759155,0.0044675805,0.001462844,0.0024589077,0.004518177,0.0015635986,0.0012144453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028695117,0.0002810832,0.6297071,0.0002046055,0.000063048756,0.0006594419,0.012416559,0.0007904982,0.00029796996,0.07190117,0.10187109,0.18152048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000489653,0.00016042034,0.7402346,0.00057236926,0.000044704157,0.0010231659,0.024232004,0.002561882,0.0008581823,0.03679816,0.193413,0.000052557698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065600467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009780666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008403603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016233169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021625885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028112829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108486231","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Canada Legal Research Guide: Legislation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.17832400093949366,"score_gpt":0.46640891516382454,"score_spread":0.2880849142243309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108486231","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012355059,0.00312949,0.009565282,0.011513733,0.0012563646,0.00836857,0.29373786,0.003841128,0.66735214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0050178193,0.006125861,0.029199602,0.005096007,0.00028444044,0.010673436,0.09886427,0.0023769548,0.8423615],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887947,0.0014117862,0.0008139612,0.0007482146,0.0073914053,0.0008400041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90782577,0.014095761,0.0016702604,0.003831696,0.0694978,0.003078731],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012846629,0.0009619518,0.0015001956,0.011425667,0.007059582,0.0070636347,0.0038622222,0.0027165506,0.34672043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046017338,0.0019062681,0.0007726504,0.020325476,0.0020993373,0.004608249,0.001915859,0.004264738,0.17710875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000921031,0.000021475948,0.00012230274,0.00022256305,0.0000016088538,0.000012820719,0.0002261503,0.000033021348,0.00006872618,0.0039474145,0.97872263,0.016612105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010766843,0.0000070843857,0.0015820494,0.00039227595,0.000005640161,0.000018277415,0.00040305243,0.00003898263,0.00012800968,0.00089335983,0.9965005,0.000019931907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7395907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8917937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34672043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026717942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15301946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.931824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112305715","doi":"","title":"Breaking Ranks (and Precedent): Reference re Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act, 2020 ABCA 74","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Appeal; Law; Political science; Subsidiarity; Substantive due process; Government (linguistics); Supreme court; Separation of powers; Referendum; Greenhouse gas; Parliament; Doctrine; Law and economics; Constitution; Economics; European union; Politics","score_opus":0.019209500498176754,"score_gpt":0.27669472022818536,"score_spread":0.2574852197300086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112305715","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024276441,0.005760775,0.0022199769,0.22617915,0.0052304096,0.00025469525,0.0013563687,0.00027825264,0.7344439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2239722,0.001402636,0.0034022366,0.20439635,0.0010005982,0.00018807607,0.0006106786,0.00014046859,0.56488675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859985,0.0009969671,0.0002949464,0.0012214391,0.008187672,0.0033005443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99476445,0.0015793572,0.00012974147,0.00022771879,0.0026942552,0.00060442503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006228634,0.000713197,0.0005694819,0.0018938078,0.021413257,0.014304924,0.004441606,0.023123318,0.0099397395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017833715,0.0010336279,0.00091020047,0.0020354774,0.008382574,0.003008113,0.0023165122,0.017278805,0.0031993461],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003994418,0.00003520271,0.00088091916,0.000038916227,0.000012556006,0.00050317944,0.0039299335,0.0003326931,0.0008089537,0.5550844,0.42737067,0.01096265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005264753,0.00005215768,0.008331301,0.00022963696,0.000047225447,0.00012772925,0.0039603203,0.0008322625,0.0010429622,0.04536409,0.93975663,0.0002031584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9450181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9741034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07035901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07035901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09563983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5104927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118576861","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Law: Introduction & Country Information","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.011064737125793077,"score_gpt":0.2409444573655515,"score_spread":0.22987972023975842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118576861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005792298,0.0042643873,0.0006643595,0.009550149,0.0017236775,0.0004926283,0.07048534,0.001869256,0.910371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012719497,0.0026265234,0.00069612695,0.0011233555,0.00014513245,0.00010413696,0.011408662,0.00039898104,0.98222524],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968815,0.00014663256,0.00014670895,0.0001611267,0.0021595028,0.0005044605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866753,0.0009049681,0.00023165837,0.0004213487,0.010586126,0.0011804868],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026549227,0.0018890414,0.0013828026,0.011461387,0.0071299504,0.011359807,0.0027855425,0.0053296466,0.475279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009069292,0.0014726318,0.0010180067,0.021830501,0.002185511,0.0042168414,0.0019785583,0.0029901536,0.20107308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004712338,0.000009673775,0.000055323868,0.000071668386,7.048141e-7,0.0000057018196,0.00002644528,0.000057531775,0.000019020808,0.0023847593,0.9876177,0.009746701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052715313,0.0000036586534,0.0013896652,0.0001722741,0.0000031851903,0.0000066483517,0.00012014301,0.00007713095,0.000059266175,0.0009507294,0.9971945,0.000017362072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9615878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98438036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.475279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05691412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16002229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7484508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120624671","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Law: Yukon","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Geography; Political science","score_opus":0.030620002608394016,"score_gpt":0.2797991757128724,"score_spread":0.24917917310447837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120624671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017268348,0.0090906,0.0007362216,0.009639608,0.001073768,0.00020593834,0.042359065,0.0015803135,0.93358773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024221814,0.0022663285,0.0004514306,0.00038550244,0.000032475597,0.00003858905,0.0040578353,0.000271078,0.9900746],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862576,0.000064785774,0.00007334402,0.00014744014,0.0007964331,0.0002922805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954839,0.00034328058,0.00009837011,0.00017141986,0.0034114067,0.0004916681],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001160868,0.0013662304,0.00093622523,0.005204855,0.009259445,0.010954828,0.0018626606,0.0035739543,0.49151823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004907247,0.0011418739,0.0005651499,0.015201643,0.0018787428,0.003476342,0.0020366954,0.0023679438,0.12276944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013433105,0.00001038417,0.00021111657,0.00012918607,0.0000017477657,0.000025844387,0.00016289974,0.00010906616,0.000045433077,0.0113270525,0.9525559,0.0354079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039277893,0.0000019963775,0.0013718591,0.00012400247,0.0000024039923,0.000012014049,0.00028394573,0.00008477462,0.000060866623,0.0008769748,0.9971656,0.000011562915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9719918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99095047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49151823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05089985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13860704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72528756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121162138","doi":"10.29173/alr31","title":"Cut-and-Paste Justice: A Case Comment on &lt;i&gt; Cojocaru v. British Columbia Women's Hospital and Health Centre&lt;/i&gt;","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"B.C. Women's Hospital & Health Centre","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.02434530195155279,"score_gpt":0.2974120474015985,"score_spread":0.2730667454500457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121162138","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008533349,0.0059032394,0.0011056932,0.6977582,0.00612005,0.00016675124,0.0007429141,0.00014360798,0.27952617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06543841,0.0018392147,0.00079707743,0.78013855,0.0017724019,0.00017184082,0.00015306886,0.00009992654,0.14958957],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99089515,0.0010594918,0.0003439328,0.0011070241,0.0040731067,0.002521278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935468,0.0033750506,0.00022962186,0.00023354104,0.0019507846,0.0006640959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005088279,0.0007453728,0.0008365577,0.0011084629,0.02565708,0.008148059,0.004494685,0.04173002,0.009068885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01801553,0.0010434869,0.0011861863,0.001958174,0.010118698,0.0028039252,0.0024469423,0.029186424,0.0023725135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026078947,0.000013421783,0.0005423481,0.00005081968,0.000008550734,0.00081181235,0.0030282664,0.000085138854,0.00017975023,0.0888727,0.9025259,0.0038552776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005877893,0.000028604984,0.004503547,0.00043679087,0.00006545793,0.00062623725,0.0072754617,0.00035197975,0.00054864556,0.015672775,0.9702994,0.00013231844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78013676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9169873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21986324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02703835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048932508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44231606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121163730","doi":"","title":"The Evolution - or End - of Marriage?: Reflections on the Impasse over Same-Sex Marriage","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Emblem; Legalization; Institution; Marriage law; Lesbian; Law; Political science; Family law; Writ; Sociology; Gender studies; History","score_opus":0.023231151012212146,"score_gpt":0.3066077325682289,"score_spread":0.28337658155601675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121163730","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029232468,0.05115801,0.0020131394,0.8207866,0.0029849783,0.000014709983,0.000020604983,0.000011438842,0.09377801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79636484,0.023833543,0.0009275789,0.15415463,0.0047800564,0.000050597428,0.00002000321,0.000059524315,0.019809294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9796919,0.013136357,0.00038669998,0.001289763,0.0028595165,0.0026357134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838802,0.012930739,0.00072987744,0.00044366004,0.0010210094,0.000994472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021624047,0.00033268862,0.00073504593,0.0014889275,0.022242352,0.017108997,0.0029273261,0.021352401,0.0038941016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025497746,0.00046458354,0.0005488767,0.0014389183,0.094740026,0.018021917,0.009449086,0.024492763,0.00047584932],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000139338945,0.000023326384,0.00040904403,0.000037840076,0.0000030567514,0.00041489716,0.043926302,0.000056805227,0.00006965805,0.9348681,0.015259081,0.0049179234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003105253,0.00004764778,0.0015631616,0.0007704214,0.000010458966,0.00052636897,0.09333656,0.00018895128,0.00029703512,0.5382042,0.36498123,0.000042867407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02171705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030535856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022242352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014195203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009386407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11436021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121551587","doi":"","title":"Section 2(b) Advertising Rights on Government Property: Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority, a New Can of Worms and the Liberty Two-Step?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Offensive; Censorship; Section (typography); Supreme court; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Scope (computer science); Advertising; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Business; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.009869531556974587,"score_gpt":0.24305472176946194,"score_spread":0.23318519021248735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121551587","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12059522,0.0020069631,0.0031234934,0.12390601,0.00065669115,0.00021075751,0.00036425947,0.00008592847,0.74905074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7263179,0.0007553702,0.0017333158,0.059975136,0.00036568756,0.00017757177,0.00009734066,0.000046397432,0.21053122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943025,0.00072780694,0.0001621728,0.00083393115,0.0021300865,0.001843489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960932,0.0019484337,0.00021419814,0.00032198956,0.001015517,0.00040666512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003170857,0.0004542819,0.00046413846,0.00096396887,0.013023665,0.0118487375,0.002563225,0.019081667,0.009066854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008813649,0.0008056823,0.0005224434,0.0009809227,0.012545004,0.0037535122,0.002393306,0.012640901,0.001098751],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022936636,0.000025944724,0.0016648974,0.00003313871,0.000007922789,0.0005956353,0.0040181717,0.00016792624,0.0005877636,0.95589393,0.03184601,0.005135645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001222035,0.00009909373,0.014345861,0.0005355271,0.000101137855,0.00090779166,0.015295202,0.0017669507,0.0035048223,0.2170955,0.7459843,0.00024162073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5331447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7534481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4668553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016307924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018418225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9392094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121580119","doi":"","title":"Parent Education Programs in Family Courts: Balancing Autonomy and State Intervention","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Intervention (counseling); Dispute resolution; State (computer science); Conflict resolution; Family law; Psychology; Best practice; Child custody; Political science; Best interests; Social psychology; Public relations; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.014096699668035558,"score_gpt":0.2956563983992676,"score_spread":0.28155969873123204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121580119","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8769189,0.0019413887,0.015117387,0.027691519,0.00033097627,0.0008808905,0.000030338755,0.00018139256,0.07690725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915087,0.00034188927,0.0027550363,0.0021268583,0.00009122808,0.00024415366,0.00001167489,0.0000057575285,0.0029145668],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939097,0.0035757478,0.00019255921,0.0006293202,0.00067266356,0.0010200978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986172,0.009252666,0.0011483609,0.0005632185,0.00033350804,0.002530275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006734698,0.0001881218,0.00020731146,0.00084297196,0.0040827403,0.0026195291,0.0019405199,0.0034902887,0.0054310267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019276446,0.00029554122,0.0003162264,0.0004792867,0.003001595,0.0030967675,0.006080043,0.0036086317,0.00028712742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006488336,0.013538927,0.051624164,0.00062320346,0.00014025536,0.002924033,0.043600634,0.0071802456,0.003950738,0.31495142,0.011556999,0.54926056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006065147,0.013131319,0.2048006,0.00654945,0.00059008796,0.004289223,0.063718915,0.033536058,0.0155053055,0.3860688,0.26534086,0.00040419085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003739715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014315611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006734698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00271707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077687986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035616934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121646640","doi":"","title":"The Personal Information Protectionand Electronic Documents Act: A LostOpportunity to Democratize Canada's\"Technological Society\"","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information society; Political science; Internet privacy; Public relations; Business; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.00823376168224244,"score_gpt":0.24372380977963076,"score_spread":0.23549004809738833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121646640","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06308918,0.002355841,0.0020763401,0.58133894,0.0016412871,0.0001760118,0.0011403739,0.0003076328,0.3478745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31923112,0.0018809428,0.0032614784,0.14929672,0.0005623317,0.00012116232,0.00039931477,0.0001776799,0.5250692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847698,0.0009524932,0.00024115505,0.0006955788,0.008496753,0.0048443205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877109,0.0028045466,0.0005348593,0.00082469475,0.0041490584,0.003975825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053753564,0.0007307244,0.00050084427,0.002612219,0.031338107,0.018184094,0.003482802,0.019435644,0.02087042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017568791,0.0009081889,0.0009836096,0.0029243673,0.01563481,0.0047825496,0.006117566,0.017782489,0.0021509207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040566923,0.000110572866,0.003544078,0.00005174717,0.000024119188,0.00028990253,0.0049700597,0.00047187225,0.0006648122,0.6618761,0.3017875,0.02616879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005165694,0.000035637866,0.0129307145,0.00015476382,0.000054788572,0.00010397986,0.0057347007,0.0011056535,0.0010229793,0.031689424,0.9469742,0.00014144079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9919369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11154068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11154068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.43810904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8092881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121699755","doi":"","title":"A \"Reasonable\" Expectation of Sexual Privacy intheDigital Age","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privacy law; Information privacy; Internet privacy; Law; Psychology; Business; Computer science; Political science; Privacy policy","score_opus":0.027124936271374533,"score_gpt":0.3105962681194601,"score_spread":0.2834713318480856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121699755","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4135898,0.0007933464,0.02617099,0.10664178,0.00032792176,0.0001305031,0.00044077614,0.00010691796,0.45179796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99058425,0.00007225288,0.0007090865,0.0037564533,0.00005166237,0.000020436008,0.000020946689,0.000003938676,0.004781136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940965,0.0023173655,0.0003061022,0.00058238197,0.0009906605,0.0017068728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98533857,0.007424387,0.0017821919,0.0017004473,0.002126219,0.001628132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007992514,0.00023651369,0.00034994082,0.00070277596,0.0047066454,0.0060643014,0.00089300907,0.0055803196,0.011580829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034248844,0.0003114877,0.00040479837,0.00031448234,0.0067905528,0.0040448564,0.002745727,0.004592967,0.000891238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000909046,0.00008121405,0.011344582,0.000025726942,0.000016049671,0.000885544,0.0059580407,0.0004885197,0.0003995731,0.96954244,0.0043742685,0.0067930566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000963065,0.00021568846,0.017001674,0.00017150915,0.00005899317,0.0030063784,0.020675892,0.0038231,0.0023782605,0.89454937,0.0579391,0.00008369017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010126338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013695268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011580829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024450703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052475836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04226899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121714131","doi":"","title":"Proportionality in the Criminal Law: The Differing American versus Canadian Approaches to Punishment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Proportionality (law); Statute; Political science; Law; Criminal justice; Constitution; Punishment (psychology); Criminal law; Charter; Criminal procedure; Theory of criminal justice; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.5830334374999637,"score_gpt":0.46388903905426315,"score_spread":0.11914439844570057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121714131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063281104,0.017479455,0.013626719,0.07210018,0.0010205912,0.000070010276,0.00016423844,0.00008355807,0.8321741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94442385,0.011804542,0.0074432814,0.0072296932,0.00033680646,0.00006723447,0.000058763704,0.00006450368,0.028571308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864395,0.0032048707,0.00029346632,0.00089028897,0.007065238,0.0021065937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99161196,0.00242351,0.00036683324,0.000405326,0.0042955587,0.00089675304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058556288,0.0004382638,0.00051613944,0.0032872797,0.011959994,0.009508163,0.0024635964,0.0021702256,0.003968817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017748998,0.0003148252,0.00052674935,0.0043458655,0.018638661,0.0034677808,0.003213752,0.004992762,0.0002405158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019065881,0.000009746633,0.0010589941,0.00004659403,0.000008944134,0.00004709626,0.005287036,0.00017158772,0.00011512211,0.97001463,0.0045195683,0.01870157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078156096,0.0000823198,0.052676015,0.001089195,0.0002562224,0.00072482723,0.029465685,0.003874049,0.0010308683,0.4747497,0.43560275,0.00037021947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9407953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97581565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07689628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07689628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08416923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55792415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121853942","doi":"","title":"'The Normal Ones Take Time': Civil Commitment and Sexual Assault in R. v. Alsadi","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Guard (computer science); Sexual assault; Involuntary commitment; Psychology; Civil rights; Security guard; Psychiatry; Power (physics); Criminology; Law; Political science; Medicine; Computer security; Medical emergency; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Mental health","score_opus":0.018599408638417875,"score_gpt":0.2765613553115887,"score_spread":0.25796194667317085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121853942","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.123724945,0.0061800224,0.0029060126,0.56967014,0.003515149,0.00020653127,0.0001195655,0.00012557345,0.2935521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62642324,0.0022138706,0.00053307065,0.30665976,0.0020061356,0.00018291295,0.000035522724,0.000072226525,0.06187329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898391,0.0039191674,0.00043442586,0.0008605309,0.0016387973,0.0033079446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99347126,0.0044290177,0.0005556676,0.0003378381,0.0005688305,0.0006373398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01027249,0.00052083365,0.0008925118,0.00079650106,0.023826098,0.008191194,0.0033088038,0.049745265,0.0052687284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020722033,0.0009169587,0.0012000912,0.00075859984,0.017271865,0.004957047,0.006666007,0.03575561,0.0010318303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010674895,0.00013008348,0.0026649067,0.00013373583,0.000029705345,0.014860828,0.10780104,0.0004418258,0.0009699085,0.79539245,0.07164275,0.0058259782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026198267,0.00040877095,0.010035733,0.0017942048,0.00013425414,0.006926967,0.17122778,0.0016759753,0.002355163,0.20319735,0.6016174,0.00036440135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.087041624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.123811245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087041624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006242348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011431766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17306995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122093128","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1253","title":"Ordinary People, Necessary Choices: A Comparative Study of Childcare Expenses","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Legislature; Flexibility (engineering); Tax deduction; Context (archaeology); Baseline (sea); Variety (cybernetics); Public economics; Law and economics; Economics; Order (exchange); Actuarial science; Sociology; Political science; Law; Gross income; Tax reform; Computer science; Management; Finance; State income tax","score_opus":0.029280073424633273,"score_gpt":0.3613706878434686,"score_spread":0.3320906144188353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122093128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9167355,0.0016222555,0.0005060181,0.0010589709,0.000014067416,0.000023362183,0.00013806284,0.0000020795735,0.07989976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99771774,0.00063038565,0.0001867462,0.00011900268,0.0000075172993,0.000013254082,0.000076806435,0.0000033468039,0.0012452235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99625564,0.0019424158,0.00009915181,0.00020638896,0.00094202976,0.00055431883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933503,0.0046310797,0.0008561241,0.00017558981,0.0006653102,0.00032163467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022063334,0.00011739884,0.00039900347,0.0032512627,0.0039705704,0.003057587,0.0006138199,0.00079019455,0.006256698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009186316,0.00014192724,0.00025937453,0.0052921064,0.0049394052,0.0033475142,0.0023696271,0.0011656525,0.00013418042],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032700613,0.00039950057,0.100239016,0.00033027676,0.00014249259,0.0018937109,0.22218493,0.0012201556,0.00063495646,0.6186171,0.004614986,0.049395908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006482226,0.0002662289,0.3454642,0.0005137507,0.0000828089,0.0007568203,0.5130692,0.0009283595,0.00064945343,0.03701349,0.10112554,0.00006528086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.076197684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17016105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076197684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008508785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020707657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15150833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122171275","doi":"","title":"“Natural Born” Disputes in the 2016 Presidential Election","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Presidential system; Political science; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Presidential election; Judicial review; Politics","score_opus":0.015105933032825125,"score_gpt":0.3169053765679362,"score_spread":0.30179944353511107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122171275","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22582926,0.01268437,0.0055135675,0.19303972,0.0063747563,0.00021897076,0.00028948596,0.00010000332,0.5559499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88158023,0.00226194,0.0017009294,0.047857005,0.0021563952,0.00015637313,0.0000897128,0.00006627845,0.06413109],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97599256,0.0109157525,0.0014925948,0.0026338554,0.0037737126,0.005191496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98377925,0.011014211,0.0011116831,0.00073724595,0.0020508086,0.0013068507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03100173,0.0003103311,0.0008082653,0.0009000744,0.02751925,0.014310108,0.0018807864,0.01478006,0.0044021164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036573112,0.0007826978,0.0007833384,0.0010773742,0.009983908,0.006256624,0.005826649,0.016281424,0.0009223441],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050000297,0.000063889296,0.002120403,0.000075038726,0.00001506733,0.0015405738,0.022887265,0.00018886155,0.0004248295,0.9134718,0.049464483,0.009697776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010378261,0.00012746039,0.0096304,0.00041224548,0.000056779896,0.0007137188,0.025270408,0.0007527041,0.0016324267,0.08820695,0.8729028,0.0001903252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058034614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13593605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058034614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011854723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0113858525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1639548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122242701","doi":"","title":"Judicial Settlement-Seeking in Parenting Cases: A Mock Trial","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Settlement (finance); Mediation; Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Dispute resolution; Best interests; Political science; Normative; Law; Alternative dispute resolution; Child custody; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.028284608529605966,"score_gpt":0.2990803392286651,"score_spread":0.27079573069905916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122242701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8155196,0.0026153314,0.01875342,0.013347256,0.0011315646,0.0022375812,0.0001418942,0.00009891528,0.14615452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9683101,0.00067151047,0.012900818,0.0040299892,0.0002664124,0.001491985,0.000060672537,0.000023368515,0.012245227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9628471,0.029812047,0.0012147382,0.0012307497,0.0030598296,0.0018355282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94132876,0.051121686,0.0015093646,0.0021528811,0.0020856345,0.0018016598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028503627,0.00055120315,0.0010292203,0.0009367388,0.00950124,0.0055191717,0.0022149845,0.010721827,0.004435009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.074588105,0.0005713585,0.0011055551,0.0011997604,0.0061419914,0.0035314048,0.006908858,0.006656154,0.00092474057],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024475253,0.004526584,0.012415106,0.0011404628,0.00019610689,0.02724762,0.1593559,0.007169046,0.009418883,0.6421829,0.03971061,0.09418931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0059468956,0.01448986,0.02141592,0.0027153024,0.0003951135,0.015215047,0.10890903,0.046930306,0.023005798,0.38861954,0.37146425,0.00089291227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017491357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045005307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028503627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025134555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022369192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15074337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122587374","doi":"","title":"Accessing with Dinosaurs: Protecting Access to Government Information in the Cretaceous Period of Canadian Democracy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Government (linguistics); Freedom of information; Democracy; Accountability; Politics; Political science; Business; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.01441090964558543,"score_gpt":0.2706919971771945,"score_spread":0.25628108753160905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122587374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47875062,0.009535379,0.0039877375,0.07251336,0.0005983226,0.00018629999,0.00071097986,0.00008717302,0.43363017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9438627,0.0034066527,0.0026896335,0.0074262065,0.00006765801,0.00004102038,0.0001677461,0.000023894276,0.042314544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99602306,0.0003841521,0.00009137178,0.00037298977,0.0012992074,0.001829133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958716,0.0008057098,0.00040987227,0.00024654917,0.0017382564,0.0009279073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002494113,0.000276618,0.00022752598,0.0017283378,0.026593236,0.00795462,0.0015958764,0.0027594366,0.003469947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008094874,0.00025355953,0.0002978988,0.0023184007,0.014598189,0.0022402776,0.0031139308,0.0028953846,0.00027847267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010235228,0.000043533702,0.04645172,0.00022151228,0.00002284997,0.002535161,0.17731373,0.0008866096,0.0022115102,0.64670783,0.03399513,0.089508034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016555345,0.000039416234,0.1091013,0.000512557,0.000050381263,0.00061927084,0.08667695,0.0006229745,0.0014491326,0.016149702,0.78457814,0.00018359933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9925132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8891419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11085808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13903742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8043355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123314778","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3157","title":"Musings and Silences of Chief Justice William Osgoode: Digest Marginalia about the Reception of Imperial Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Legislature; Political science; Government (linguistics); Philosophy","score_opus":0.029584433551938502,"score_gpt":0.31789449808654124,"score_spread":0.28831006453460273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123314778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44134712,0.011035008,0.002460065,0.19664624,0.0016345843,0.000042786898,0.000095528994,0.00012055607,0.34661812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9677017,0.0008641986,0.00016869241,0.006767894,0.00016612807,0.000008948175,0.000011421873,0.00006968278,0.024241475],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954963,0.0019555334,0.000086744534,0.00040750654,0.0010669695,0.0009869162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915882,0.0052257897,0.0004593258,0.0003412801,0.00143099,0.0009543601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047707553,0.00033276097,0.0004071875,0.0013492556,0.031611584,0.010365843,0.0011571127,0.003514433,0.0037196546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018262817,0.00042435838,0.00016877372,0.0012450425,0.048586737,0.0047697276,0.005310359,0.007379658,0.00042939893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060913575,0.000008638188,0.0009066252,0.00003701458,0.0000080893515,0.00060020265,0.8153627,0.000047058333,0.00086130085,0.14114375,0.030340994,0.010622702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009604609,0.00001631328,0.0027027666,0.00015564912,0.000010481332,0.00023129563,0.3721266,0.000103337494,0.0009676256,0.016367318,0.6072501,0.00005897321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50159997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.619983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49840003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025530823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012787803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99736065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123887407","doi":"","title":"Securing a Future for Children: the International Custom to Protect the Natural Family","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Natural (archaeology); Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.009500188083425908,"score_gpt":0.24445037008973752,"score_spread":0.23495018200631163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123887407","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098668754,0.009190238,0.0038266666,0.112912074,0.0006464496,0.000087971785,0.0001277281,0.00006845744,0.77447164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87107617,0.00300848,0.0027379906,0.0176267,0.00016511841,0.000052953987,0.000057860118,0.00004102459,0.10523374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967026,0.0005375358,0.00007244384,0.0003496548,0.0009391309,0.0013986286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898034,0.00028138445,0.00012373767,0.00010366315,0.0002208199,0.0002901001],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031536703,0.000221769,0.00018199903,0.000473415,0.013491268,0.004858268,0.0008114661,0.0028585014,0.0036668568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004219018,0.00019591812,0.00016236643,0.00061567104,0.018983142,0.0021026265,0.003933669,0.006997981,0.00024452194],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040691343,0.000006154807,0.0012626081,0.000011739595,0.0000016071324,0.0001775325,0.020025017,0.00006260864,0.00012089993,0.94997245,0.017060392,0.011294958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012359333,0.0000185514,0.0072174184,0.00026182845,0.000009971622,0.0003589815,0.020007769,0.00016394575,0.0003946406,0.03949065,0.9320286,0.000035318637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62375104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7879877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62375104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01959249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046207048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7569295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124012522","doi":"","title":"The Death Penalty, Mandatory Prison Sentences, and the Eighth Amendment's Rule against Cruel and Unusual Punishments","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Prison; Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Constitution; State (computer science); Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.018312038699929877,"score_gpt":0.2829163941783379,"score_spread":0.26460435547840805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124012522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25745225,0.006593928,0.011185341,0.08592098,0.0012642834,0.00023382899,0.00046039332,0.0001633891,0.6367256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9699461,0.00071630214,0.0018402188,0.0056918366,0.00048246665,0.000112245616,0.000059411825,0.000018908671,0.021132492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886635,0.0024516112,0.0007730484,0.00113235,0.0037989172,0.0031806591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99045557,0.0051039294,0.0014778072,0.0006971958,0.00146834,0.0007971483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077696512,0.00033206373,0.0006624338,0.0014765826,0.007273767,0.007847089,0.0023122886,0.008992637,0.0036770378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026819479,0.0005853304,0.00069433125,0.00063696684,0.014677185,0.0024458219,0.00386586,0.009815761,0.0005624276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036621535,0.000033722157,0.0010701454,0.000026626758,0.0000102551285,0.00035132928,0.0014366566,0.0004811045,0.00019020712,0.98189664,0.0077427677,0.0067239287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034810012,0.00026253672,0.027509974,0.0007723819,0.000120996694,0.000900002,0.0037588184,0.003924816,0.0014086263,0.8280379,0.13272968,0.00022607164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11481887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15802316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11481887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006045971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014707614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22830111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124248368","doi":"","title":"The Loyalty of Lawyers: A Comment on 3464920 Canada Inc. v. Strother","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Loyalty; Business; Political science; Management; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.0363073417879423,"score_gpt":0.2781827264901342,"score_spread":0.2418753847021919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124248368","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005183764,0.0022936123,0.00028320306,0.94450426,0.0019321237,0.000050724255,0.0004522006,0.000049257822,0.04525093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03837232,0.0011570553,0.0002776382,0.92922515,0.0015545103,0.00004925372,0.00008372062,0.000044645712,0.029235696],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98703176,0.0011600305,0.00044437035,0.0014476622,0.0057964395,0.004119758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97052604,0.01604582,0.001034076,0.0005363803,0.009138783,0.0027188316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009681283,0.0007776331,0.0013871811,0.0018188728,0.0316507,0.010082788,0.006932598,0.07354774,0.009503566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04182881,0.0014635922,0.0016914095,0.0037608,0.013952109,0.0039911256,0.002798922,0.04088419,0.0023827609],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056705943,0.000017063829,0.0016801778,0.000068581554,0.000028091217,0.00036473584,0.004154007,0.00010169779,0.0001908207,0.07930653,0.91039956,0.003631895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024435978,0.000058891776,0.015943106,0.00093037396,0.00028878995,0.00030004955,0.011425052,0.00084483484,0.00125208,0.030647576,0.9377052,0.00035971453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94609636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9815166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07354774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0506903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12187399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36778557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124396383","doi":"10.29173/alr438","title":"Misusing the \"No Duty\" Doctrine in Tort Decisions: Following the Restatement (Third) of Torts Would Yield Better Decisions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Duty; Tort; Supreme court; Law; Duty of care; Political science; Law and economics; Liability; Economics","score_opus":0.05400105752533564,"score_gpt":0.34799846423620323,"score_spread":0.2939974067108676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124396383","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.100864656,0.08398899,0.01601142,0.53480875,0.003986124,0.00016977165,0.00011244531,0.00008638666,0.2599714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8965471,0.02474522,0.00441782,0.055438705,0.0013808697,0.000036819554,0.000048997485,0.000027002423,0.01735754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9679551,0.020061811,0.0012398026,0.0019187975,0.0068935617,0.0019308542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93288094,0.050193276,0.0063037137,0.0018745974,0.0078768665,0.0008705719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039536368,0.00034402913,0.000467041,0.0020531006,0.005552015,0.0072395047,0.0018695402,0.00839853,0.0024872664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08433084,0.00046793604,0.0006278265,0.001525089,0.011408612,0.0057249404,0.0022055462,0.0068975314,0.0004831278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070800575,0.00010080829,0.0109006995,0.0004229583,0.0000696556,0.00053729187,0.0048497356,0.0010942626,0.0005628196,0.85621184,0.046841357,0.0783377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015476314,0.0003541108,0.044642776,0.0032425814,0.00042203418,0.0009782013,0.01214418,0.0034770358,0.003126856,0.48971727,0.4414712,0.00026901177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062091433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12477222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062091433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011085346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017194396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20909083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124604407","doi":"","title":"Balancing Competing Priorities: Affirmative Action in the United States and Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Dissenting opinion; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Law and economics; Promotion (chess); Race (biology); Public administration; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.009899411710128722,"score_gpt":0.27175180293503837,"score_spread":0.26185239122490966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124604407","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08529774,0.015918609,0.003882144,0.1083781,0.00083779177,0.00018281191,0.00032173347,0.000069074165,0.785112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8739231,0.009606604,0.005045788,0.022046942,0.00012859564,0.0000970389,0.00013173034,0.00004145008,0.08897877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99127805,0.0011792205,0.00014724204,0.0004975788,0.0035822738,0.003315674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99548596,0.0009586462,0.00017635322,0.00011403726,0.001796,0.0014689734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004398467,0.0003883453,0.0005814263,0.0020167036,0.03028179,0.014630587,0.0023744341,0.0048271413,0.006697316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008028618,0.00035479877,0.0005576866,0.0036266085,0.015033596,0.0033890293,0.0054879733,0.005452943,0.00032787956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035055153,0.00003155275,0.0031856014,0.00007354237,0.000021903152,0.0003457392,0.016199473,0.0012279737,0.00016362165,0.9188741,0.030903555,0.028938003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062994826,0.000040763112,0.01052824,0.0005228265,0.00009936579,0.00020792447,0.05823159,0.0023672248,0.0005176817,0.13988145,0.7873206,0.00021931312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9963176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99845064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18150246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18150246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34052634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9493411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124877502","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005634","title":"Professor Raz, the Rule of Law, and the <i>Tobacco Act</i>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Legislation; Rule of law; Statutory interpretation; Charter; Damages; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.012557742456289472,"score_gpt":0.26976392151120326,"score_spread":0.2572061790549138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124877502","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018469742,0.040711574,0.013171542,0.5409041,0.0020304252,0.00012903965,0.00033959668,0.00013961723,0.38410437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72417605,0.017899586,0.014014848,0.1348183,0.0020514284,0.00016982232,0.00013722393,0.00009641154,0.10663629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934923,0.001596079,0.00029261239,0.00084524736,0.0025636822,0.0012100199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968695,0.0016738164,0.00040898073,0.00015209983,0.00068397453,0.00021158799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049440246,0.00041858855,0.00045500003,0.0010590304,0.009240387,0.008221252,0.0016558416,0.008674838,0.0031729133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008478519,0.0003673039,0.0006257211,0.0014356422,0.031727985,0.003994753,0.0022786756,0.011911923,0.00082022115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004613883,0.000002994359,0.0001102365,0.000015943686,0.0000019323725,0.000039869083,0.00081481325,0.00007520688,0.000045672914,0.9854811,0.011499441,0.0019083743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037837643,0.000025980493,0.0011106279,0.00019724177,0.000022423597,0.00014287732,0.0011163739,0.0005135991,0.00035099633,0.5781891,0.41823822,0.000054682136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42524043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38391772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5747596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018607737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03023119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8455305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124898474","doi":"","title":"Flip-Top Not Distinctive of Philip Morris, Rules Federal Court of Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Federal court; Political science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.015592420227016028,"score_gpt":0.266079163632439,"score_spread":0.250486743405423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124898474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10758464,0.004155672,0.0027556708,0.20931885,0.001958312,0.00026434675,0.0010737231,0.00021314032,0.6726757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6288324,0.0010816192,0.0011431308,0.04050253,0.00031205828,0.000085283114,0.00012609437,0.00014757582,0.32776934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99218583,0.0005741593,0.0002158336,0.0012232669,0.0024162813,0.0033845936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99264103,0.0021675904,0.00023028562,0.00035802697,0.0032927142,0.0013103342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033849396,0.00038498806,0.0009456483,0.0012525587,0.03702762,0.012827214,0.0022846393,0.012060135,0.023550173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022612574,0.0007955609,0.000568748,0.0015274188,0.0064873938,0.00463797,0.0024048884,0.011980538,0.0016354767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007350329,0.000045249828,0.0046119364,0.000060399572,0.00004185971,0.0005255331,0.0060335817,0.00034754234,0.00033056363,0.7039178,0.2684994,0.0155126415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008206152,0.00006709449,0.02779752,0.0004644143,0.0001993362,0.00033200576,0.026013572,0.0022130848,0.001846695,0.18219772,0.7584271,0.00035945416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94376427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98388624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05623573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043452863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10192243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31527406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125079091","doi":"","title":"TWU Law: A Reply to Proponents of Approval","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Law; Supreme court; Lesbian; Opposition (politics); Sociology; Dignity; Statutory law; Political science; Politics; Gender studies","score_opus":0.01765990161242735,"score_gpt":0.279456748126513,"score_spread":0.26179684651408563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125079091","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021652752,0.0010383502,0.0006738218,0.98122597,0.004429282,0.00001612739,0.000015462241,0.000029353932,0.010406363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05195044,0.00089257746,0.0007881759,0.9317803,0.007946634,0.00007368738,0.00002315481,0.000112928006,0.0064321556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92164165,0.027073985,0.0049117664,0.009952143,0.02683762,0.009582805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7645506,0.19365175,0.0053754593,0.0054406547,0.023869555,0.0071120546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07800636,0.00093727134,0.0022991574,0.0025182122,0.023672724,0.020876426,0.009897138,0.124698296,0.005588661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19666433,0.0019275601,0.0029345052,0.0033490371,0.07509643,0.024669198,0.012657689,0.14191793,0.002505835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034234607,0.000056292916,0.0009509718,0.00010151072,0.000022663717,0.0007749543,0.020025503,0.00017976697,0.00011388346,0.548203,0.4218816,0.007655741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010263403,0.00009654135,0.0009910027,0.001213832,0.000044711098,0.00049666874,0.024284827,0.001212587,0.00057417934,0.21540977,0.75530666,0.0002666131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027835049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021200558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.124698296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016785333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025489103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.412542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125212540","doi":"10.24926/26390742.1993","title":"Originalism and Its Discontents (Plus a Thought or Two About Abortion)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional commentary","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centennial College","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Constitutionalism; Constitution; Meaning (existential); Fidelity; Epistemology; Original meaning; Argument (complex analysis); Epiphenomenon; Thought experiment; Interpretation (philosophy); Soundness; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science; Democracy; Politics; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07849300993930311,"score_gpt":0.3629534299588191,"score_spread":0.284460420019516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125212540","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03905886,0.01838157,0.011491314,0.43732223,0.0024871447,0.000042104726,0.00007946788,0.000042101838,0.49109513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93649006,0.0024630092,0.0020495914,0.02852201,0.0017407143,0.000061924526,0.000029576695,0.00005654016,0.028586619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894477,0.007040458,0.00023389765,0.0010644534,0.0014885308,0.0007249353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99086285,0.0072335713,0.00038538154,0.0007362107,0.0005950803,0.00018688547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008950656,0.00027900923,0.0003238231,0.0008149508,0.007104524,0.006943549,0.0011755516,0.007179604,0.0032133502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014816168,0.00023294789,0.00046566717,0.0006475087,0.073138446,0.0064256266,0.0037244374,0.009218581,0.00032916776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054029188,0.0000026860137,0.00003653064,0.000010833134,9.901205e-7,0.000027679873,0.0025804539,0.000018518795,0.000024738265,0.99333364,0.0023850598,0.0015733914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020162437,0.000014221116,0.00032564817,0.00012606896,0.0000065516865,0.00007054133,0.0028393583,0.00016229141,0.00023527571,0.8902332,0.10595294,0.00001366806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005887691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00608788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008950656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005365115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004226469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0473361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125276268","doi":"","title":"Family Law Reform in (Neoliberal) Context: British Columbia's New Family Law Act","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Law reform; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.00918706077473235,"score_gpt":0.24559867625893814,"score_spread":0.23641161548420578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125276268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6436289,0.0037769352,0.00043540032,0.16574545,0.0006226285,0.00017835526,0.0009867515,0.000056360546,0.18456922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8660294,0.0011496949,0.00045198936,0.024364868,0.00007676194,0.000109381275,0.00016306968,0.000033017484,0.10762178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.994464,0.00088312174,0.00015478037,0.00040924884,0.0012920365,0.0027967603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98912734,0.0031113198,0.0004041425,0.00041090243,0.0024376446,0.0045086755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040521338,0.00024379566,0.00053594675,0.0015392503,0.021421457,0.011451209,0.0029159524,0.00890972,0.010248911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015185033,0.0005971987,0.00033435252,0.0025899026,0.007988928,0.0022614475,0.0042582834,0.01011793,0.0006351828],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032213065,0.00059292413,0.06533216,0.00022243532,0.0001011687,0.0044263387,0.0740977,0.0024364386,0.0015850052,0.508931,0.2619405,0.08001214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001749615,0.00010150709,0.3085195,0.0007725541,0.00011800433,0.0004247607,0.08442973,0.0018926105,0.0009795156,0.020975228,0.58128804,0.00032359426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.986847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14287516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14287516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20782804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125408551","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1219","title":"\"Constitutional Chicken\": National Security Confidentiality and Terrorism Prosecutions after R. v. Ahmad","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Constitutional right; Legislation; Confidentiality; Jury; Parliament; Secrecy; Terrorism; National security; Politics","score_opus":0.04501341516142714,"score_gpt":0.31891517556036436,"score_spread":0.2739017603989372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125408551","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32618317,0.015822358,0.006567469,0.19752635,0.001751168,0.0002714671,0.00023462196,0.000065421445,0.45157796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94405866,0.0020971226,0.0011553853,0.027368406,0.00036205235,0.00004750919,0.000039018545,0.000017363054,0.024854442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98615915,0.0031185627,0.0004001176,0.00127689,0.0050990307,0.0039461576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877707,0.0083627775,0.0008627784,0.00048536144,0.0017519173,0.0007664721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013863767,0.00023059334,0.00054600916,0.0014648115,0.017672107,0.009034886,0.0026458672,0.013237936,0.002648199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026567742,0.00052263885,0.00077348074,0.0013528005,0.017857978,0.0039296355,0.0042386255,0.015437578,0.0002498897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033292097,0.000026916674,0.0016601714,0.000041050975,0.000012929661,0.0012302328,0.009575673,0.0002769376,0.00047087626,0.9710297,0.009254651,0.006387539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030774777,0.0004036428,0.04056166,0.0012542795,0.00033381247,0.0022216102,0.05315229,0.0032048947,0.008337285,0.39603287,0.4937442,0.00044574018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51849943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.618993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9713702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028629798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050757494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96867245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125879772","doi":"","title":"Can a Court Change the Law by Saying Nothing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Patentable subject matter; Law; Nothing; Majority opinion; Quarter (Canadian coin); Concurring opinion; Supreme Court Decisions; Political science; Certiorari; Intellectual property; Original jurisdiction; Patent law; History; Patentability; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04920999125744193,"score_gpt":0.31889411836985154,"score_spread":0.26968412711240963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125879772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18690923,0.0036162552,0.03121733,0.3353779,0.003119734,0.00034787832,0.0010401687,0.00042989003,0.43794167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8574821,0.0008426078,0.0047928756,0.116427645,0.0014758577,0.00014220159,0.00021396272,0.00020443917,0.01841841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9594244,0.012534959,0.0020089578,0.008336028,0.013412678,0.004283051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90711653,0.058778126,0.011929376,0.011551888,0.008363285,0.002260802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03091933,0.00037239745,0.00093963544,0.0013978026,0.0064876177,0.014131014,0.0031147848,0.010156356,0.02048988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16621964,0.00063308317,0.0008587652,0.0022281173,0.01338854,0.019216547,0.0039402326,0.01292661,0.0057806713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014418249,0.0003703356,0.028992007,0.0003092585,0.00022611364,0.0011587433,0.010898755,0.001423827,0.0020725175,0.81852657,0.081453115,0.054424573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023814713,0.00020030909,0.02046319,0.0006013971,0.00029001787,0.00047473627,0.010404777,0.0023855267,0.002344721,0.57831144,0.38405746,0.00022818016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018485622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022281839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03091933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00538807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008368055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16351897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126088849","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1019","title":"Correlativity, Personality, and the Emerging Consensus on Corrective Justice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personality; Psychology; Economic Justice; Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.028136906328389607,"score_gpt":0.3426470481351979,"score_spread":0.3145101418068083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126088849","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060569886,0.11291615,0.043406777,0.62886006,0.0049354085,0.000029228308,0.00007026594,0.0001163239,0.14909591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88846016,0.04495912,0.011150292,0.04446101,0.0042329663,0.00007550573,0.00006900427,0.00011443344,0.006477411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97760916,0.010378446,0.0011536814,0.0036078724,0.006054589,0.0011963104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9631551,0.026358854,0.0021638419,0.0024855898,0.004232213,0.0016044194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02867957,0.00059285795,0.0012908119,0.004201236,0.0065503456,0.011804763,0.0033224344,0.0094016185,0.0024149294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025288593,0.00032078323,0.00071426213,0.0024592,0.056334265,0.017619817,0.0076871854,0.015253225,0.0004562065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012750761,0.000011435531,0.00026959673,0.00008685919,0.0000070422366,0.000059677746,0.0063278913,0.00019061599,0.00005063351,0.9728252,0.002665556,0.017492535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066860543,0.000017137907,0.00047406746,0.00043640504,0.000004884364,0.00008586411,0.0064406716,0.00034040166,0.00011317396,0.95151937,0.040535692,0.000025765275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022494935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018433875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02867957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008386602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071808784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15167385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127324697","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Law: Provincial & Territory Legislation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Political science; Public administration; Business","score_opus":0.023655803917817526,"score_gpt":0.2663762862219683,"score_spread":0.24272048230415078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127324697","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011968312,0.0028305391,0.0003769453,0.0128125055,0.0012178242,0.00046146772,0.03833262,0.0007712381,0.94200003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018028307,0.0010310586,0.00041758388,0.0017442591,0.00006530862,0.00009249231,0.003569212,0.00016908889,0.99110806],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99634486,0.00014056903,0.00013886196,0.0001781656,0.002391868,0.0008056554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902862,0.00078007806,0.0001261509,0.0002846927,0.0075355093,0.0009874272],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026868377,0.0014778783,0.0011306206,0.0073621967,0.014638066,0.012044323,0.0030720762,0.0083863875,0.3527243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009508797,0.0015885585,0.001030009,0.012167929,0.0026317341,0.0033796194,0.0023942979,0.004688079,0.09609704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007398451,0.00001522747,0.00011767523,0.000063383326,0.0000013182392,0.00001637442,0.00012147606,0.000057965288,0.000030375679,0.010889855,0.98041105,0.008267958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007376835,0.000002862606,0.0015788556,0.00010831604,0.0000037277748,0.000007928497,0.0002454071,0.00007755961,0.00005778464,0.0010519256,0.99684036,0.000017965767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.990227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3527243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.096295245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29472947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9232602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127551180","doi":"","title":"Legal Ethics and Canada's Military Lawyers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Legislature; History","score_opus":0.014285994276415151,"score_gpt":0.2670874063036218,"score_spread":0.2528014120272067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127551180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16524269,0.018898338,0.00096103817,0.3424887,0.0009296447,0.00012206317,0.00035717717,0.00006502961,0.47093537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8477844,0.0065358835,0.00078663183,0.025142895,0.00030816128,0.00004101787,0.0001244478,0.000037508642,0.119239084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904107,0.0011239599,0.00019914251,0.00053571066,0.003880157,0.003850404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97775453,0.0055380645,0.0015895786,0.00028516768,0.00815715,0.006675512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035712027,0.00028851346,0.00033517816,0.0025041183,0.034115035,0.010558701,0.0017330766,0.00501334,0.015112753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017923906,0.00054049,0.00025364006,0.0032874346,0.013456047,0.0020583165,0.0029853883,0.005189093,0.0007176922],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006211401,0.00011650254,0.022822397,0.00026512065,0.000023302622,0.0016257149,0.059844814,0.00059736,0.00056947215,0.6776114,0.17972614,0.056735676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042086598,0.000032642314,0.056666367,0.00058536424,0.000024827943,0.00032261238,0.039265253,0.0005064941,0.00032484074,0.019377014,0.8827626,0.000089900146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99167234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99628675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22406375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22406375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30608934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8999761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128694934","doi":"","title":"Choosing Affordable Health Insurance","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Medicaid; Actuarial science; Business; Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Health care; Psychological intervention; Self-insurance; Group insurance; Insurance policy; Public economics; Health insurance; Income protection insurance; General insurance; Economics; Political science; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.0212316036586312,"score_gpt":0.298144125575376,"score_spread":0.2769125219167448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128694934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025690403,0.003197429,0.022674056,0.17419153,0.0011413916,0.00023947089,0.00041788054,0.00014497271,0.77230287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7002347,0.004764913,0.023359034,0.14163692,0.0017724098,0.00044883724,0.0005585566,0.0002013066,0.1270233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921302,0.0024646402,0.00033988088,0.0006873847,0.002903037,0.0014747442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953755,0.0022695789,0.00037449854,0.00057781633,0.0006007732,0.0008018377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066749738,0.0003717563,0.00037587783,0.0009473428,0.003481058,0.004869508,0.0009627371,0.0061946954,0.024258474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01923287,0.0002792751,0.0006121621,0.0004992613,0.0066050948,0.005173549,0.0047923056,0.0038823904,0.0028885026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010762824,0.00002814155,0.0011439259,0.000025311183,0.000010439429,0.00011470627,0.00080852746,0.0001746705,0.00013825824,0.95014817,0.029560803,0.01783634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034410074,0.00005784423,0.0020579738,0.000317963,0.000025167601,0.00027626983,0.001433278,0.0008007479,0.0003884995,0.47116187,0.52340364,0.000042349177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005594061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009736634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024258474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028026456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006152412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08115268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133561944","doi":"","title":"Tending the Bar: The \"Good Character\" Requirementfor Law Society Admission","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Law; Bar (unit); Political science; Geography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.029853419716642154,"score_gpt":0.31755118244864583,"score_spread":0.28769776273200365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133561944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21626663,0.00026488173,0.020342512,0.13798429,0.00096688623,0.00046708056,0.00023529308,0.00021518083,0.6232572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96914804,0.000051704938,0.0026434683,0.00589046,0.0002517331,0.00014960322,0.000045523306,0.000059512364,0.021759976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97825885,0.0057057627,0.0009951226,0.0025345718,0.005813013,0.0066926638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97035843,0.0071282685,0.0028066721,0.005425557,0.0064745788,0.007806542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010890076,0.00044320006,0.0013460495,0.0015802161,0.020198885,0.010008665,0.0024346206,0.0139664225,0.04864397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06068514,0.0008344837,0.00095252704,0.0012078816,0.026228294,0.008381182,0.010596428,0.012364158,0.0043314425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007767635,0.00015222425,0.0036468862,0.000035523233,0.000011050585,0.00017108407,0.002211535,0.0001694221,0.00047689062,0.97492313,0.008852457,0.009272085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000133643,0.00012052195,0.010768088,0.000102955055,0.000026117277,0.00046659782,0.006921258,0.0013335661,0.0009990425,0.92650163,0.05253526,0.000091302856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011066554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024853347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04864397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005313848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017592246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16273034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3140242985","doi":"10.29173/alr512","title":"Recent Judicial Developments of Interest to Oil and Gas Lawyers","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Energy law; Fossil fuel; Law; Business; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Environmental law; Engineering; Computer science; Waste management","score_opus":0.06734845769902215,"score_gpt":0.3369462035963154,"score_spread":0.26959774589729324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3140242985","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07053323,0.2968757,0.0010857228,0.21994574,0.0038907803,0.00012069203,0.0013619845,0.00013341474,0.40605283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5304204,0.27689862,0.0023934653,0.06320888,0.0063161585,0.000054759283,0.001446154,0.00007772175,0.119183786],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892313,0.00088673603,0.0003759008,0.00066035683,0.006477169,0.0023685235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96731186,0.007579971,0.0025949196,0.000317567,0.020012585,0.0021830774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007114022,0.00024382563,0.0003878085,0.008067248,0.007936146,0.009503848,0.0018695795,0.0044127544,0.008023075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023052977,0.000676741,0.0003598277,0.011835943,0.0045513003,0.0015138901,0.0010577156,0.0036423996,0.0006567981],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013360825,0.00011060153,0.01121914,0.001481066,0.00008125101,0.0018854378,0.0077306516,0.0018253361,0.0011499115,0.20911282,0.50383943,0.2614307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026748065,0.000027247468,0.03038806,0.0003965224,0.000048687027,0.00028259392,0.0028604914,0.0002363839,0.00031066092,0.0034140525,0.961937,0.00007156979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9399166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9849782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082907915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.082907915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.096213594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6015419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142173966","doi":"10.29173/alr354","title":"Recent Judicial Developments of Interest to Oil and Gas Lawyers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Creditor; Energy law; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Fossil fuel; Judicial review; Judicial opinion; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Environmental law; Finance; Engineering","score_opus":0.1103150384777167,"score_gpt":0.35085352382388235,"score_spread":0.24053848534616565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3142173966","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034407556,0.49048448,0.0008178116,0.21612322,0.0029214097,0.00006659875,0.0005143927,0.00007264155,0.25459188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41199276,0.4562243,0.0016472747,0.06809705,0.0048572645,0.000039898372,0.00062696775,0.000058520152,0.056455977],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877466,0.001337423,0.00047668663,0.0009593216,0.0069063483,0.0025736452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9697973,0.008249496,0.0025923718,0.00038773834,0.01703065,0.0019423394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010368621,0.00028437015,0.0005078432,0.007765065,0.0077471235,0.013266214,0.0026064746,0.0058371434,0.0074106664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026262155,0.0006749996,0.0004642323,0.013332692,0.0075886776,0.0022971914,0.0014642028,0.0053650388,0.0007519657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085973916,0.00010018906,0.00528426,0.0015262993,0.00006691965,0.0013245196,0.0073372363,0.0013084763,0.0009198035,0.3687503,0.39086643,0.22242963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020644711,0.000020895717,0.0138102,0.0007179633,0.000038556012,0.0002933692,0.0033641378,0.00025457458,0.00027925172,0.0053075156,0.9758261,0.00006686629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.886324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9573302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.886324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09297783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09562523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67460454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3147754447","doi":"","title":"Easements, Errors, and Energy Projects: Shelf Holdings Revisited","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Easement; CLARITY; Appeal; Law; Confusion; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Business; Political science; Engineering; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.00860961904611829,"score_gpt":0.25492887073728954,"score_spread":0.24631925169117125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3147754447","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27181035,0.017578177,0.007962869,0.16572613,0.0006682078,0.00007918453,0.00031963497,0.000079244215,0.5357762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9436671,0.0034419878,0.0009166352,0.015907891,0.00019733503,0.000019888928,0.00003494956,0.00002608963,0.035788078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99222577,0.00079999503,0.00021727991,0.00080689066,0.003929489,0.002020569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941837,0.0031871449,0.0003894788,0.00027998688,0.0014935021,0.0004661571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046427916,0.00033059242,0.0004280856,0.001838541,0.01332091,0.012748399,0.0030267774,0.010689133,0.0042043137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012713368,0.00050061947,0.0004913037,0.002745919,0.031546418,0.0058763507,0.00543358,0.011131063,0.0002499326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008403621,0.0000079483425,0.0014622739,0.000025808537,0.00000522435,0.00046264415,0.0112363,0.00027188048,0.00009776185,0.97049475,0.0084377555,0.007489238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007347158,0.000057804064,0.025778895,0.000752482,0.00011559065,0.0011332164,0.06516287,0.002872047,0.0016767278,0.3878103,0.5143231,0.00024355226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8933281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9242199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8933281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04294185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05572244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3115664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3148053063","doi":"10.29173/mlj784","title":"The Many Facets of Cook v. Lewis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"History; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.01490434989745106,"score_gpt":0.27859002118797693,"score_spread":0.2636856712905259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3148053063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006712705,0.004458944,0.0015681561,0.4904232,0.0017621645,0.000025586056,0.000056802728,0.000036197234,0.49495634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30842552,0.0033688685,0.00082143006,0.51447904,0.0025360214,0.00010815875,0.000034807366,0.00009993647,0.17012624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954319,0.0016956999,0.00008411725,0.0007097732,0.0011163088,0.000962224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99451125,0.003245731,0.00018041325,0.00030289005,0.0009008987,0.0008587881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050629475,0.00033733176,0.00031159105,0.00081915304,0.014255026,0.009384536,0.0015122585,0.009771789,0.011686961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016853422,0.00039314904,0.00031682,0.000859751,0.02267588,0.0059535033,0.0042523555,0.018304395,0.0015339471],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019529476,0.000012929929,0.0003958683,0.000021342034,0.000004644509,0.00015450464,0.002481537,0.00005442105,0.000051110437,0.7648587,0.22613977,0.005805587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022079661,0.000013565951,0.0007676613,0.00026960068,0.000008410287,0.00017666501,0.0067247404,0.00021722005,0.00026272488,0.36857116,0.62291247,0.000053757325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.093410395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15521802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9065896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006500638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011787332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18573338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156576711","doi":"10.29173/alr2644","title":"Mental Illness and Professional Regulation: The Duty to Report a Fellow Lawyer to the Law Society","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Duty; Mental illness; Political science; Psychology; Psychiatry; Mental health","score_opus":0.01958376856903326,"score_gpt":0.32950541519407395,"score_spread":0.3099216466250407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156576711","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042425256,0.061319534,0.0044144187,0.6759407,0.0023774577,0.00006102981,0.000035443056,0.000034036886,0.21339208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8355173,0.027151464,0.0018785616,0.10247979,0.0025047364,0.000048062833,0.000029789124,0.00002572142,0.030364484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98619545,0.007586363,0.00064285443,0.0008306466,0.0033034822,0.0014411517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98111993,0.012924131,0.0019426432,0.00076764944,0.0019961304,0.0012494647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013875427,0.00013081482,0.000299935,0.001192212,0.007022368,0.008799228,0.0014586318,0.009465984,0.0023368539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03144882,0.00034757654,0.00025046075,0.0010255646,0.031109292,0.003693741,0.004020975,0.008232406,0.00028645233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008586994,0.000026793481,0.0020926972,0.00013098217,0.000006208476,0.00042905562,0.016779482,0.0001424139,0.00015917704,0.9132754,0.027513199,0.039436024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040570558,0.00008206873,0.016456751,0.0021636765,0.000031588548,0.0011721911,0.02730006,0.00035611182,0.00037827517,0.29286417,0.65906185,0.00009264737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11602167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16761698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98882055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01117947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034175076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23069268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157772177","doi":"","title":"Introduction to the Law and Markets: Regulating Controversial Exchange","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Refugee law; Law; Human rights; Refugee; Sovereignty; Variety (cybernetics); Criminal law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.009186826359915088,"score_gpt":0.2715300291001338,"score_spread":0.2623432027402187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157772177","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054539284,0.056840952,0.015170787,0.4297733,0.018192839,0.00015123455,0.00021883476,0.000117656185,0.47408062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3457594,0.08103812,0.015170124,0.14361672,0.04716708,0.00074275234,0.00023525034,0.00039188107,0.36587864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722064,0.0015074627,0.00010893821,0.00025960305,0.00065316504,0.00025032082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955819,0.0033717004,0.00021513918,0.00019041907,0.00041148489,0.00022932854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035307088,0.00061583717,0.0004094732,0.0016441075,0.007832109,0.011458985,0.0016908781,0.009807738,0.014762497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005605372,0.00040260245,0.0008642734,0.0016200638,0.021288201,0.011481167,0.0036995786,0.012255674,0.0015371668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050720273,0.0000115408475,0.00005882575,0.00005184551,0.0000018688331,0.000088397304,0.002861025,0.00007854604,0.000058598922,0.9395696,0.052191213,0.005023514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054364264,0.000015597643,0.00024298414,0.00046170794,0.0000030725596,0.00011171073,0.00360773,0.0001895988,0.00010874345,0.17311953,0.822119,0.00001493086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004827774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064131995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014762497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005556637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038133583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04938543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158902389","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3827342","title":"The Perplexities of Patent Prosecution History: Procedure over Principle?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Patent law; Economics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.025030601107359246,"score_gpt":0.2767984386898429,"score_spread":0.25176783758248367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158902389","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19905825,0.04290989,0.09343467,0.49391332,0.002276068,0.00023443566,0.001598694,0.00040337985,0.16617127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.960955,0.008135123,0.00946169,0.013785878,0.0017874491,0.00013617655,0.00031143223,0.00024836243,0.0051789097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9772051,0.012567625,0.0019527815,0.0033914908,0.0035911754,0.0012917946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7739945,0.17991501,0.014103015,0.015022052,0.013045167,0.003920408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.078067906,0.00039615048,0.0009632045,0.0098622665,0.0070521594,0.016692763,0.0042760093,0.0071644066,0.009180438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2491163,0.0010166386,0.000554607,0.006965662,0.044309445,0.04421756,0.006917789,0.01050844,0.0011938364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012242836,0.0000573727,0.0171856,0.00038149103,0.00009054115,0.00031344825,0.03843981,0.0007370064,0.0003693559,0.8350292,0.0142845325,0.09298928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014883891,0.00005156095,0.01911975,0.0007262503,0.000042565563,0.00048552488,0.011409123,0.00092719437,0.0006847945,0.88821274,0.07820251,0.00012318938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008915465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010964039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078067906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006789765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008624239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4128675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160819707","doi":"","title":"Regulating Energy Innovation: US Responses to Hydraulic Fracturing, Wastewater Injection and Induced Seismicity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Hydraulic fracturing; Induced seismicity; Corporate governance; State (computer science); Business; Environmental planning; Engineering; Political science; Petroleum engineering; Civil engineering; Environmental science; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.021456006462347323,"score_gpt":0.3026793241869373,"score_spread":0.28122331772459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160819707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4523877,0.0038218652,0.0055361046,0.21617004,0.000612177,0.000094264,0.0001974294,0.000083695464,0.32109666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97778416,0.00079547236,0.00061680266,0.0154535,0.00010455054,0.000043499935,0.000023768534,0.000011128472,0.0051670442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909951,0.0036524597,0.00042640374,0.00074222055,0.0022757174,0.0019080925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839532,0.011466157,0.001986119,0.0005799958,0.0016113576,0.0004033391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00944606,0.00014875818,0.00025869758,0.0010652422,0.005270053,0.006702838,0.0010202456,0.0067403815,0.0027143105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02338083,0.00015317558,0.000538326,0.0017819148,0.00725472,0.002177132,0.003200295,0.005166067,0.00020233114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008358537,0.00008449181,0.010381254,0.000097102486,0.000033492117,0.00046326427,0.012241169,0.0018698112,0.0015074896,0.9362548,0.016348328,0.020635206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012532117,0.00036077746,0.058704253,0.0006969804,0.00018017546,0.00047156808,0.04690347,0.005197086,0.010845536,0.42044365,0.45582572,0.00024548534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025472028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03801119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025472028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0080893515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007034828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058692634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161990443","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Law: Saskatchewan","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.024403731915836745,"score_gpt":0.26978527091254517,"score_spread":0.24538153899670842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161990443","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010750567,0.0040205186,0.0007599232,0.0051303254,0.00055972923,0.00025002507,0.042456374,0.0009813025,0.9447667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001183229,0.0014695226,0.00045165844,0.0003030704,0.000016385346,0.000052093084,0.0039172582,0.00021082013,0.9923959],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987828,0.000078111305,0.00007308099,0.00014908695,0.0006757738,0.00024107889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99438876,0.00058301,0.00009829648,0.0002818978,0.0041370494,0.0005109346],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014251296,0.0018144369,0.00108759,0.005723502,0.0087860245,0.010099879,0.0023111997,0.003535876,0.5760827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057578576,0.001756911,0.0006323436,0.01751594,0.0018739366,0.003650785,0.0021088156,0.0029418585,0.20944472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013546271,0.000013076874,0.00020384787,0.00009496999,0.0000018004993,0.000021715092,0.00011302181,0.00013626364,0.000048369286,0.0075748027,0.9590328,0.03274579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006777209,0.0000032782443,0.0015193714,0.00015996907,0.000003414558,0.000012594594,0.0002940332,0.00012464513,0.00009623647,0.0014149799,0.99634844,0.000016292088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9673422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99276114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5760827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052884564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13523217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6046666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164953031","doi":"","title":"Affirmative Action in Higher Education: What Canada Can Take from the American Experience?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Supreme court; CONTEST; Charter; Political science; Law; Constitution; Diversity (politics); Politics","score_opus":0.02307608121030572,"score_gpt":0.30784968718962147,"score_spread":0.2847736059793157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164953031","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013600384,0.027953489,0.0008016652,0.68546504,0.0020900376,0.000019312532,0.00015707515,0.000031988813,0.26988104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6891133,0.0639243,0.00201451,0.1705919,0.0015418278,0.000053751424,0.00018350678,0.000085358515,0.072491474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98920435,0.0023266203,0.00020300828,0.00060104934,0.0037541552,0.00391072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98300385,0.004764542,0.00046455796,0.00055731536,0.006749446,0.0044603543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00803356,0.0005008887,0.0007835635,0.0019697328,0.04721521,0.021108277,0.0026938745,0.008636564,0.0085811475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01771551,0.00026025219,0.0005196497,0.005805661,0.029745173,0.007475205,0.0048429845,0.014914265,0.00068805995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039599865,0.000037613052,0.0018979914,0.00012017494,0.000009775917,0.00022756681,0.017141929,0.00024467078,0.00008035796,0.78141856,0.1629803,0.035801504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002563879,0.000021063423,0.005203546,0.0006861836,0.000029846702,0.00011300417,0.032154784,0.0002712836,0.00015534519,0.08258767,0.8786486,0.00010313098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9893472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99372476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13783643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13783643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24327505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164985285","doi":"","title":"Judging as Nudging: New Governance Approaches for the Enforcement of Constitutional Social and Economic Rights","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Mandate; Political science; Accountability; Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Principal (computer security); Social rights; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Separation of powers; Public administration; Law; Business; Human rights; Economics","score_opus":0.042259918008263085,"score_gpt":0.28148632306244525,"score_spread":0.23922640505418216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164985285","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027092297,0.0062398096,0.46900645,0.09753962,0.0006978088,0.00036864393,0.00008332946,0.00018252921,0.3987895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8860713,0.002599002,0.095761836,0.0042261467,0.00055128336,0.00034425157,0.000034751367,0.000060605904,0.010350837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9728854,0.016397871,0.0011868308,0.0030729931,0.004878845,0.0015781451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9774096,0.014280043,0.001903993,0.0041347933,0.0016313213,0.0006402633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0394251,0.00061657594,0.0008037511,0.0032582919,0.006939897,0.0143827135,0.0034714346,0.0067750113,0.004182796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030771097,0.0005620704,0.00091765,0.0028012146,0.09457928,0.0148534365,0.005717283,0.011812859,0.0003301905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014730804,0.000004100586,0.00006478764,0.0000092301025,0.0000012834009,0.00000949035,0.0006591364,0.00025389783,0.000025913929,0.9963685,0.00019370092,0.0024083618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011335601,0.000007872441,0.00015260128,0.00006100481,0.0000042454662,0.000013865218,0.0003850135,0.0010068425,0.00008062893,0.98772174,0.010545101,0.000009750469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015138717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026950385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0394251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017591314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016115624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20850235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W316779082","doi":"","title":"Luddites No Longer: Adopting the Technology Tutorial at the Supreme Court*","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Court of record; Law of the case; Court of equity; Concurring opinion; Majority opinion; Original jurisdiction; Economic Justice; Precedent; Damages; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.03193479066182143,"score_gpt":0.31783938553340246,"score_spread":0.28590459487158104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W316779082","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0169254,0.007882208,0.013273001,0.41092163,0.006405571,0.00008124194,0.0001126155,0.0008163451,0.543582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39738813,0.010078437,0.009346248,0.19512098,0.004593278,0.00022484662,0.00018128913,0.00043009565,0.38263676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99542123,0.0014557327,0.00017776954,0.00053672236,0.0016288995,0.00077969744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958413,0.0024677387,0.00018510537,0.00023346329,0.0005869535,0.00068550126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042766486,0.00030572093,0.00024338759,0.0009867286,0.010742458,0.012089236,0.0018003499,0.01020549,0.019106925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011170291,0.00042685008,0.0003565601,0.0007772219,0.007026416,0.012151302,0.0044077314,0.01167414,0.0047328323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008810985,0.000074037205,0.00085266423,0.000058300426,0.0000031378177,0.00088325306,0.0064452863,0.00023787095,0.00061691,0.52781487,0.40199554,0.061009258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049683713,0.000041007836,0.0006319718,0.00024138862,0.00000599,0.0003735713,0.003277553,0.00033929123,0.0004523603,0.045700878,0.94889814,0.00003280492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010202013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033046424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019106925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068720034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009432645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06391901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169239051","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Analysis of the Treatment of Transgender Prisoners: What the United States Can Learn from Canada and the United Kingdom","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Rochester; Emory University","keywords":"Kingdom; Transgender; Political science; Criminology; Medicine; Sociology; Gender studies; Geology","score_opus":0.037532346775630575,"score_gpt":0.2903665470817529,"score_spread":0.25283420030612236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169239051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7146314,0.113081135,0.0004243993,0.08203714,0.0016926028,0.00027329326,0.002716255,0.000028780625,0.08511512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9498075,0.032842554,0.00050597993,0.010037558,0.00011941098,0.00008679591,0.0008158633,0.00002500628,0.005759291],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99026114,0.0021515323,0.00048965286,0.00031202988,0.002659129,0.004126536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97539335,0.0028483153,0.001320728,0.0005293815,0.016563807,0.0033443684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004880672,0.00035831382,0.0008824642,0.0041210046,0.008653319,0.004427852,0.0016463891,0.001994147,0.0041146334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018998656,0.00030095075,0.0010737332,0.006197215,0.0027499553,0.0018485702,0.002574027,0.0017908828,0.00023199146],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030858086,0.00069342885,0.41941354,0.005264377,0.0007649969,0.0046636686,0.09475454,0.0010656096,0.0015886775,0.061400212,0.11140361,0.29590148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015660147,0.00027647207,0.6998398,0.005849348,0.00065998774,0.00076089695,0.18826164,0.00032287597,0.0006120224,0.0009624259,0.102047265,0.00025076757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9891046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99734926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09308167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09308167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12823659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67535794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179356839","doi":"10.29173/alr2654","title":"The Walking Wounded: Failure of Self-Represented Litigants in 2017 Supreme Court of Canada Leave to Appeal Applications","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.01557545823346896,"score_gpt":0.2951537408384793,"score_spread":0.27957828260501033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179356839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9825502,0.0005610799,0.00014002084,0.003150675,0.000042567975,0.00008003112,0.00040965594,0.00001236108,0.0130535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961159,0.00030047377,0.00006571202,0.000631642,0.000012326262,0.000015496007,0.00020592516,0.000009455254,0.002642964],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861444,0.0014687727,0.00047278235,0.0011066785,0.006044349,0.0047629327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9754279,0.004205361,0.0051329103,0.0008258796,0.009277196,0.005130688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067603956,0.00021474456,0.0005941143,0.00327351,0.011602096,0.00695638,0.0028265628,0.0013961697,0.0036905326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032265358,0.00037217277,0.00031445984,0.003742852,0.005360758,0.0013038471,0.005022441,0.0030011383,0.00043672722],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023763142,0.00024244218,0.7716162,0.00014114902,0.000106231164,0.0016191268,0.13225819,0.0003161709,0.0005787143,0.010376053,0.027007796,0.0555002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012224932,0.00006583008,0.76899934,0.00024242132,0.000067617744,0.000313645,0.20734368,0.00065472483,0.00039501284,0.0006963066,0.02113714,0.000071998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96932226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98887324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045488745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045488745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07560898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33004546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3180907258","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Reading List on Anti-Black Racism and the Law: Slavery in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Law; Reading (process); Sociology; Political science; Genealogy; Gender studies; History","score_opus":0.05628139280294006,"score_gpt":0.35755255899492483,"score_spread":0.3012711661919848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3180907258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005239991,0.059411693,0.000763423,0.14117052,0.0111157615,0.0010985489,0.06469134,0.00062094064,0.7158877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012132026,0.043509062,0.0010631725,0.011029003,0.002532867,0.00053517014,0.010273149,0.0003400707,0.9185856],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989328,0.00011507406,0.000064455846,0.00008865088,0.0005471207,0.00025200538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868001,0.0028984013,0.00022630811,0.00017931321,0.008625264,0.0012706016],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013798422,0.0010565771,0.0012101238,0.010489656,0.014453285,0.0074335216,0.0025845424,0.0050126854,0.17048483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007719458,0.00072544045,0.0006486517,0.023732698,0.0017153437,0.0033826674,0.0015487795,0.0025230052,0.021025801],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000400775,0.000017121163,0.0003573089,0.00017111574,0.000001827118,0.000023352897,0.00062371953,0.00003656017,0.000020744346,0.0022263017,0.9841564,0.012361403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013449869,0.000011027073,0.011612207,0.0012719807,0.000014564539,0.000031925116,0.006225851,0.00008023103,0.00007396596,0.0021201004,0.9785135,0.00003124207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97711265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9935887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99256647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03795658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.143246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5703286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183566964","doi":"","title":"Turning the Tables on RDS: Racially Revealing Questions Asked by White Judges","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); Law; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.015920724273393836,"score_gpt":0.28388893423677336,"score_spread":0.2679682099633795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183566964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7908585,0.002890803,0.005373336,0.0828087,0.0022590184,0.00024190525,0.0003687391,0.00010797522,0.11509095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96093094,0.001016025,0.0018110927,0.0199717,0.00063635723,0.00021037755,0.00013185068,0.00011574601,0.015175966],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96795905,0.025126554,0.000676983,0.001285831,0.0029223918,0.002029252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9578519,0.034836616,0.0025021178,0.00076422945,0.0025780797,0.001467033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019995488,0.00059167505,0.00052255945,0.0021516667,0.019730164,0.011989505,0.0013070387,0.005365301,0.004569438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06596235,0.0007322085,0.00041415542,0.0016255929,0.00996618,0.0069590756,0.0059811096,0.0058836117,0.0010622466],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006781159,0.00004525824,0.004193964,0.00005746999,0.0000081244825,0.0007049457,0.94773346,0.00005035745,0.00086537475,0.016252391,0.018243002,0.011777748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006883306,0.000029141014,0.0025835452,0.0001516073,0.0000043746654,0.00009800824,0.92904896,0.00018048302,0.00036455356,0.0043507423,0.06315552,0.000026201325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033088893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061498225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033088893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006416777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037717172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10574758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184232745","doi":"10.7939/r3-rjhx-sb10","title":"Alberta (Education) v. Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (Access Copyright)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Alberta Library","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Internet privacy; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.01132229790481223,"score_gpt":0.23240191986753417,"score_spread":0.22107962196272193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184232745","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010439479,0.0032255307,0.0006746028,0.026333548,0.0007091019,0.0000893726,0.0012456817,0.00023957023,0.9570432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07793878,0.0014764338,0.00091045635,0.022677753,0.00010348695,0.000029934417,0.00042290558,0.000057568242,0.8963827],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959765,0.00016794195,0.000077209654,0.00019565952,0.0021729772,0.0014097787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99532604,0.0007645447,0.00009798452,0.00012140008,0.002857413,0.0008326302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017087319,0.0004468888,0.00033708118,0.0021558397,0.016809225,0.007545756,0.0016881219,0.007095065,0.050944384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006208958,0.00061218516,0.00053753325,0.0028339347,0.0019500785,0.0018316287,0.0015846089,0.0034423673,0.005488592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081317055,0.00005978295,0.0050367266,0.00014089172,0.000013567663,0.0008206668,0.0018703886,0.0002929841,0.0006539716,0.14478877,0.7957963,0.050444614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037522288,0.00002402771,0.013299193,0.00018256453,0.000044030243,0.00019681867,0.0016549802,0.00035033392,0.00093188795,0.004796454,0.9784212,0.000060978964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9796205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99445665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.961842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038158022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10096416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27685714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195054819","doi":"10.29173/mlj1197","title":"“We have centuries of work undone by a few bone-heads”: A Review of Jury History, a Present Snapshot of Crown and Defence Counsel Perspectives on Bill C-75’s Elimination of Peremptory Challenges, and Representativeness Issues","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Research Manitoba","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Jury; Snapshot (computer storage); Representativeness heuristic; Law; Political science; History; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08984798323633318,"score_gpt":0.35279371786492797,"score_spread":0.2629457346285948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195054819","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015498971,0.9872815,0.000025134996,0.010986775,0.0004110233,0.0000020770651,0.000020770882,0.0000016337375,0.0011159934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032148643,0.98623407,0.00009102975,0.009097898,0.0007999248,0.00001056239,0.00003610679,0.0000044088747,0.00051120634],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931149,0.0030833904,0.000677163,0.0005517638,0.0021625368,0.00041026153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98546404,0.008471804,0.0015942926,0.00032385075,0.0035855747,0.0005603585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010986658,0.0005528569,0.0014621433,0.006432358,0.0025979534,0.006068562,0.0018994361,0.004926728,0.0042207837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02671167,0.0006894844,0.0007383533,0.010739849,0.008055111,0.0067964313,0.002223166,0.0064715664,0.0010262291],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012459492,0.00004769896,0.0016920599,0.026971031,0.00027554054,0.00014619174,0.0025950917,0.00018296148,0.00018050651,0.048715957,0.27534014,0.64372826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022503822,0.000041386636,0.005102664,0.046549264,0.00014955286,0.00017640364,0.0021938167,0.000016833701,0.00007978024,0.006777697,0.9388585,0.000031473708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053060506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14135341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94693947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0101342425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042518243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10550332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203477145","doi":"","title":"Rejecting Word Worship: An Integrative Approach to Judicial Construction of Insurance Policies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Insurance policy; Legislative history; Statutory interpretation; Law; Supreme court; Legislation; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.016727135022781763,"score_gpt":0.3001193273696865,"score_spread":0.2833921923469047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203477145","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058728572,0.003724913,0.47714075,0.043973997,0.0009021385,0.00032117986,0.00011331404,0.0004151456,0.41468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8735206,0.0012582479,0.09750854,0.003869712,0.0008457126,0.00042828906,0.00012357277,0.00046649773,0.021978788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828839,0.01056559,0.0010869186,0.0018774334,0.0024868,0.0010993964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9742216,0.017789075,0.0011022118,0.0029815852,0.0032883738,0.0006171051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02609332,0.0007866271,0.001130668,0.0048109284,0.009170485,0.02096617,0.0050268276,0.0073322128,0.004642749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034837198,0.00091423857,0.0016798562,0.0024083687,0.060274262,0.020594614,0.008209387,0.010804393,0.0007961501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066740477,0.0000070486553,0.00009563284,0.000015017839,0.0000049818605,0.000060760278,0.009773628,0.00020070857,0.00013013881,0.98521036,0.00056591025,0.0039291545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018051678,0.000016894493,0.00018405424,0.00012075603,0.000020297091,0.000057617697,0.0044186544,0.0015507053,0.0004013311,0.96437865,0.02880696,0.000026125063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075711547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008064836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02609332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010988228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0113930255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13799632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205792654","doi":"10.29173/mlj995","title":"Manitoba's Mental Health Court: A Consumer Perspective","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Mental health; Psychology; Sociology; Psychiatry; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03757740274435816,"score_gpt":0.3455028073994768,"score_spread":0.30792540465511864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205792654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7041559,0.0020047168,0.000529109,0.16024227,0.000100975754,0.00005643468,0.0001376883,0.000018393472,0.13275439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682977,0.0019720527,0.0005433799,0.014439828,0.000057415156,0.000025669739,0.000041798427,0.000022878152,0.014599302],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826044,0.0007119933,0.00003010998,0.00008157421,0.00040523687,0.0005106953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99644464,0.0014523438,0.0002630276,0.000072298244,0.00096906,0.0007986435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025339215,0.00023844621,0.0002291099,0.0011844661,0.023999266,0.009971423,0.0011634461,0.0030237255,0.011089826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034850235,0.0003025416,0.0001446672,0.0024667776,0.008731618,0.0031196123,0.0025323299,0.0039345534,0.00032311995],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006292711,0.00027276558,0.05224728,0.00016476536,0.000014814817,0.00471546,0.78093904,0.000096297714,0.0018441192,0.10754398,0.025055097,0.027043495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006188813,0.000041677577,0.02052205,0.0002693776,0.000011681884,0.0006127058,0.8928418,0.00020747869,0.00023330683,0.0032944065,0.081934415,0.000024848849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.693546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8628281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.306454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028089188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032376986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61651754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207090722","doi":"","title":"Syllabus for Law and Religion Course (Fall 2021)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; McGill University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Syllabus; Course (navigation); Law; Political science; Mathematics education; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.00870842216145985,"score_gpt":0.28662777363449704,"score_spread":0.2779193514730372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207090722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008392279,0.00063163106,0.0026404685,0.018332677,0.0075880536,0.0027165764,0.029646197,0.0047214497,0.92533064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008942926,0.00046872575,0.004137806,0.0052307565,0.0012147529,0.002109963,0.018118745,0.0011255025,0.9586508],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897516,0.00008958085,0.000049010192,0.000091132744,0.0005206469,0.00027448803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918031,0.00030063375,0.00022503354,0.00016894209,0.0023105799,0.005191732],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015207683,0.001009208,0.0009270108,0.001888102,0.0036048754,0.0058114105,0.0019270739,0.0031224121,0.61959904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004697046,0.00084270455,0.00073144585,0.0012248317,0.00044376362,0.0024862564,0.0053818915,0.0034672406,0.552791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047270147,0.00022738798,0.00027302437,0.00006327441,9.16513e-7,0.000032094915,0.00004631092,0.000057901183,0.00025412874,0.00101176,0.9746858,0.023299994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009528913,0.00014979209,0.0068414547,0.00025075453,0.0000031080797,0.00005924146,0.0002555055,0.00039413106,0.00048924383,0.0038723787,0.98755985,0.000029280538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00981856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02667417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61959904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036460387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007979803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54259574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213061309","doi":"","title":"When Fast-Tracking Slows You Down: Reconsidering Nationwide Permit 12 Use for Large-Scale Oil Pipelines","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pipeline transport; Scale (ratio); Tracking (education); Environmental science; Petroleum engineering; Economics; Engineering; Psychology; Geography; Environmental engineering","score_opus":0.042024782898753305,"score_gpt":0.29068409543556584,"score_spread":0.24865931253681253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213061309","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022461351,0.001098385,0.0046165255,0.7964996,0.0063153817,0.000115931114,0.00017098266,0.0004585339,0.16826329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15326457,0.0010705844,0.0029767824,0.7089314,0.0033990021,0.00021083551,0.00012972733,0.0005280288,0.12948908],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836458,0.0033630251,0.0008223916,0.0024925855,0.0058014565,0.0038747997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733236,0.016059814,0.0009949688,0.0014787503,0.006612438,0.0015304949],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020563629,0.0007245022,0.00062353926,0.0007366556,0.024028156,0.014847702,0.0054531475,0.044862427,0.01081298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036987513,0.0011092863,0.0014788975,0.0007315605,0.010655033,0.013294951,0.0058351513,0.032387447,0.0031804147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053497854,0.000082597,0.0022393751,0.00008400308,0.00001424538,0.0013468047,0.010555305,0.00042255656,0.0015171347,0.29712918,0.67319024,0.013365099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003605426,0.0000994302,0.0017052678,0.00022469729,0.00003447182,0.00021939904,0.014004054,0.0007429893,0.001678513,0.020080041,0.96101075,0.00016431761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11740487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1877315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11740487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010605586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030736458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23344302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215340977","doi":"","title":"The Role of Law in the Conduct of Canada-U.S. Relations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.022021545655391727,"score_gpt":0.2559886629228827,"score_spread":0.23396711726749098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215340977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3265758,0.003888259,0.0047050514,0.07254642,0.00016942555,0.00014330634,0.0004016068,0.00006301028,0.5915071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99071676,0.00067448243,0.000538482,0.0014243879,0.0000259947,0.000013303422,0.000025119378,0.000015441308,0.006566034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98710454,0.0040567224,0.00025111745,0.0007691606,0.0034465406,0.004371942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813756,0.008521029,0.0015160296,0.00036286694,0.0054975464,0.002726936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008214116,0.00020389145,0.00030846894,0.004120034,0.025481276,0.018119264,0.0015946188,0.003200487,0.0067504225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026229892,0.00038408113,0.00032248447,0.004912801,0.025627688,0.003143792,0.0037982122,0.0037150225,0.00044040516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032226704,0.000040026163,0.020309882,0.000054656135,0.00002307547,0.00030550477,0.035306368,0.00092657533,0.00029178988,0.9088563,0.012838205,0.021015428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009692204,0.000071231894,0.18492064,0.0009573866,0.00014523957,0.00032781332,0.13967831,0.0059864554,0.0011301759,0.34808254,0.31839517,0.00020821221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96677333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9807148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.118053876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.118053876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21230769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85654485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W322187415","doi":"","title":"The Oral Judgment Practice in the Canadian Appellate Courts","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Common law; Psychology; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.01983593079110275,"score_gpt":0.34168180213300475,"score_spread":0.321845871341902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W322187415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2850886,0.018368002,0.0027491022,0.079436414,0.0014951419,0.00025375537,0.0012982413,0.00028904915,0.61102176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90466595,0.0046025557,0.0021411988,0.005543827,0.00020509423,0.00003530694,0.00019099972,0.000047744652,0.08256734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899188,0.00073144876,0.00029145787,0.00070061686,0.0061617517,0.0021958181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98780185,0.0017709784,0.00070178317,0.00048048957,0.006341477,0.0029033686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035423639,0.00029282848,0.00025211077,0.002871549,0.023168214,0.009739755,0.0025877452,0.003036846,0.012878875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013018726,0.00058758276,0.00028266723,0.004729159,0.011391619,0.0014705377,0.0028967063,0.0028522494,0.00084984914],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105327556,0.00016683537,0.03968587,0.00046339177,0.000030111538,0.0035020458,0.10330151,0.0011522009,0.0028820767,0.40089133,0.19793098,0.24988832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017672051,0.00006266279,0.066810854,0.0004940122,0.00003067656,0.0005999519,0.027631735,0.0008069425,0.0007500708,0.0062647606,0.8963157,0.00021502537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9922133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11748795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11748795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1439348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85243875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W327359422","doi":"","title":"Hopeful Result, Unclear Implications: A Comment on Canada (Attorney General) V. PHS Community Services Society","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Possession (linguistics); Legislation; Government (linguistics); Political science; Business; Public administration","score_opus":0.04954407218080468,"score_gpt":0.3524190806559234,"score_spread":0.3028750084751187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W327359422","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033446553,0.0058230055,0.00027339222,0.9361034,0.0076630116,0.000067358786,0.00053051964,0.00005902764,0.04613565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023896221,0.0018281941,0.00025466425,0.9435789,0.0030112676,0.000040025177,0.00008211553,0.000049196053,0.027259437],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98802525,0.0012256581,0.0004238923,0.0011972224,0.0046462896,0.004481726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879488,0.005964633,0.00037622597,0.00021746884,0.0041036373,0.0013891358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074860137,0.0010241976,0.001201371,0.0019226439,0.030834803,0.0121353315,0.008037316,0.061088596,0.0070044096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023984835,0.0011475534,0.0020770598,0.0035478754,0.015822869,0.0035521395,0.0030875995,0.04447493,0.0014387388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029425128,0.00001831381,0.0007745738,0.0000879858,0.000017747545,0.0010613523,0.0031826608,0.00019094371,0.00019584966,0.056567673,0.93426776,0.0036057855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042612843,0.000020635152,0.00357138,0.00065173773,0.000073302115,0.0002711391,0.007735058,0.0003988612,0.00036836215,0.010732522,0.9759334,0.00020101728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96037966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9772981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11122248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11122248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14698951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80697936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W333347183","doi":"","title":"How Just Is Our Justice System","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ETC.: A Review of General Semantics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cynicism; Skepticism; Law; Economic Justice; Faith; Sociology; Political science; Legal profession; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03499994370798245,"score_gpt":0.32622125447458317,"score_spread":0.29122131076660074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W333347183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029745277,0.008701213,0.009470513,0.39548624,0.002015134,0.000047039717,0.00042908592,0.00023301756,0.55387247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9352161,0.0033162404,0.0024223202,0.028271986,0.0014948607,0.000058066442,0.00018561089,0.00012145733,0.028913504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914436,0.003433186,0.00022446936,0.0015636958,0.0016649608,0.0016701785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950287,0.0012990242,0.00048754818,0.0006512069,0.0012415464,0.001291998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054919124,0.00021504125,0.00045078437,0.0016593373,0.0094412025,0.01692532,0.0012914686,0.0034235062,0.010301254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010985586,0.00021179931,0.00037771513,0.0014034363,0.026047159,0.014633138,0.0034941568,0.0055599716,0.0024516038],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054235506,0.000012344691,0.00097497745,0.000030334315,0.000014502052,0.000046870602,0.0038373352,0.00010508028,0.000087295666,0.95950097,0.02704391,0.008340927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070113665,0.000019300824,0.0028050242,0.00019165542,0.000013818957,0.000103712584,0.007177541,0.00020665048,0.00012217881,0.7102264,0.27909756,0.00002919119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014865458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014069904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01692532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065589626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009724439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047588885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W337740633","doi":"","title":"Security Breach Notification Soon Becoming Mandatory in Canada, Canadian Privacy Law Review","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Data breach; Information privacy; Business; Privacy law; Computer security; Law; Privacy laws of the United States; The Right to Privacy; Political science; Privacy policy; Computer science; Human rights","score_opus":0.02039286490380941,"score_gpt":0.2689180990166476,"score_spread":0.2485252341128382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W337740633","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08355669,0.09238418,0.0013208615,0.6062778,0.007868994,0.00051474955,0.008841788,0.00030803436,0.19892693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47617862,0.07339519,0.004381227,0.1912965,0.0022605509,0.0002557062,0.0040459754,0.0002456747,0.2479406],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9762453,0.0009600183,0.0010356195,0.0011598235,0.015062832,0.00553638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93536055,0.008580649,0.0025636842,0.00093553384,0.045187574,0.007372087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013063357,0.00054650666,0.0010315591,0.006968268,0.019118084,0.017567284,0.0044572577,0.011972261,0.009386363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0399362,0.001244518,0.001488167,0.008527176,0.0050978325,0.0030815715,0.00220556,0.01048834,0.000795144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017215448,0.00013027314,0.021497488,0.00084727636,0.0001525795,0.000865138,0.003136816,0.0013223425,0.0006619631,0.1015681,0.8063859,0.06326012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001270197,0.000062592364,0.13299984,0.001715676,0.00030105884,0.0002552194,0.0049945572,0.0012884904,0.000763874,0.005304592,0.8519149,0.00027229154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99814034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23746331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23746331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.61661303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88443446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W341806150","doi":"","title":"For their own good? Exploring legislative responses to the commercial sexual exploitation of children and the Illinois Safe Children Act","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vanderbilt law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Statutory law; Legislation; Legislature; Legislative intent; Law; Harm; Criminology; Political science; Safeguarding; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.08878705201028878,"score_gpt":0.33679254127003855,"score_spread":0.24800548925974977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W341806150","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1712628,0.021323618,0.0015028485,0.5479381,0.0019600624,0.00019425404,0.00026972895,0.0000979799,0.25545064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69114137,0.016582096,0.0024687306,0.18933973,0.0012131844,0.0010365928,0.0003050511,0.00012259495,0.09779063],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98197913,0.008467549,0.000771859,0.0010587174,0.0041261227,0.0035965554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9618064,0.03003603,0.0024088605,0.00046766188,0.0034582256,0.00182288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014931388,0.00044968564,0.00031795196,0.0030837758,0.018867126,0.013255059,0.003181139,0.010799146,0.007047453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029580312,0.0007090434,0.0006152323,0.0033506462,0.019393064,0.006819338,0.0079841865,0.010796029,0.0007020051],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003596655,0.00010219081,0.010810696,0.000305221,0.000012185598,0.0012236397,0.48105675,0.00030196414,0.0006360709,0.36734855,0.11464005,0.023526762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013931511,0.00005418845,0.015522694,0.0017426867,0.000018196924,0.00018798107,0.4629407,0.0002434905,0.0005056469,0.007876482,0.51076716,0.00012685783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27220348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39021382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27220348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027172573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044896424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5412382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W34182808","doi":"10.1177/02692155211028018","title":"Notional Severance, Usurious Contracts, and Two Comments on the Supreme Court's Decision in the New Solutions Case","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Severance; Appeal; Political science; Plaintiff","score_opus":0.020536581013972516,"score_gpt":0.3024325397614665,"score_spread":0.28189595874749396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W34182808","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057499457,0.004637564,0.01911238,0.57976305,0.0033823065,0.00011379887,0.0002920298,0.00007649893,0.33512288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6829521,0.0013946317,0.0061289812,0.2288856,0.003923281,0.00058035087,0.00016852906,0.00015348903,0.07581311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98329353,0.0070977965,0.0010213596,0.002041609,0.003998594,0.0025471158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844222,0.011688428,0.00068114663,0.0009854763,0.0014658609,0.00075697503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024420386,0.00091714994,0.0012281939,0.0018078645,0.013098372,0.013824816,0.004652669,0.042101786,0.0046527022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04350232,0.00094442104,0.0021633974,0.002173856,0.027530363,0.012793421,0.0076203695,0.032871578,0.00061048614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009434776,0.000006658566,0.00009114387,0.0000055746623,0.000002400213,0.000050567975,0.0005691741,0.00009415276,0.000024490346,0.9891076,0.009401029,0.00063782267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009803355,0.000031641317,0.00081224757,0.0001946392,0.000030686748,0.00014233442,0.001961527,0.0014299217,0.0004765799,0.86811864,0.12660773,0.00009602179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020324975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03181139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042101786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008310314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007939091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12914884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W36143415","doi":"10.29173/alr359","title":"An Introduction to Various Issues Surrounding the Ownership of Storage/Pipeline Gas","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Energy","funders":"","keywords":"Pipeline (software); Law and economics; Insolvency; Leasehold estate; Natural gas; Business; Class (philosophy); Economics; Law; Political science; Computer science; Finance; Engineering","score_opus":0.051576194431045885,"score_gpt":0.3566077667291348,"score_spread":0.3050315722980889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W36143415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013763507,0.044378325,0.0052502817,0.095081516,0.0023958776,0.00020987619,0.00054982374,0.000094415474,0.8382765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34899193,0.07199503,0.00749713,0.07169647,0.003520734,0.00018746882,0.00034023973,0.00010698361,0.4956641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99646974,0.00052258646,0.00013348207,0.000192768,0.0018451944,0.00083625753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99747676,0.0015750346,0.00013543859,0.00007566029,0.0006180377,0.00011902512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025234134,0.0003876956,0.00031572484,0.002123152,0.011040773,0.0066660573,0.001823263,0.0059908326,0.007754433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036408561,0.0004692759,0.0006801679,0.003223653,0.014866652,0.0033666478,0.001878496,0.006315807,0.0006925641],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039207157,0.000013392879,0.00050560373,0.00008632027,0.0000018272518,0.0004827947,0.0038368923,0.00024622836,0.0002666589,0.9159604,0.06647862,0.01211726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035787866,0.000017898492,0.0033502835,0.00040737927,0.000008072947,0.0003524162,0.004341574,0.00028531515,0.0003461099,0.048815526,0.94203246,0.000039252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72921157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80768806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27078843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02561869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022271909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5447663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W366855202","doi":"","title":"Securing Mobile Technology & Financial Transactions in the United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Internet privacy; Mobile phone; Financial services; Work (physics); Mobile technology; Consumer privacy; Computer security; Financial transaction; Information privacy; Finance; Telecommunications; Mobile computing; Computer science; Engineering; Database transaction","score_opus":0.008556099296420622,"score_gpt":0.2739848455485193,"score_spread":0.26542874625209867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W366855202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1453216,0.039177373,0.0030576617,0.2618068,0.0021741143,0.000104605984,0.00052882446,0.00014001298,0.54768896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8277037,0.048616495,0.0041545513,0.071619265,0.0015434772,0.00016514075,0.0005821814,0.000035108493,0.045580097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818796,0.00047494154,0.0001615046,0.00016510248,0.0006450937,0.0003653964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955693,0.0019479742,0.0011106179,0.00015682213,0.00088938326,0.00032591412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019888142,0.00017505168,0.0001890904,0.0013138427,0.004254789,0.008761939,0.000554249,0.005007846,0.0047908067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005590296,0.0002484278,0.00031721892,0.0016758172,0.0023154048,0.004315856,0.0017460879,0.0033806616,0.00082601205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042598233,0.0001562786,0.026487771,0.00015787336,0.000012086039,0.000942424,0.0048455815,0.0006784226,0.00060904125,0.7907288,0.084488295,0.09085078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020648231,0.00018084396,0.06814918,0.0018381793,0.000050449056,0.00096903904,0.00973468,0.0024109492,0.00094666576,0.055438377,0.8601422,0.00011887507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035238482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041924335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035238482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037314564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07006675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W368277265","doi":"","title":"Forensic Use of DNA Information V. Human Rights and Privacy Challenges","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Western Sydney law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Internet privacy; Profiling (computer programming); Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Human rights; Accidental; DNA profiling; Business; Computer science; Biology; DNA; Genetics","score_opus":0.043930047416583025,"score_gpt":0.2602114521093683,"score_spread":0.21628140469278528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W368277265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009723764,0.03776537,0.029330667,0.38427612,0.003201283,0.00015426843,0.0002722736,0.00012393808,0.53515226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69055074,0.041329257,0.020950822,0.16265023,0.009071604,0.0006000403,0.00028668315,0.00012272464,0.07443796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97449005,0.012089304,0.00097262743,0.0028627717,0.007775834,0.0018094042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96125215,0.027721759,0.0021654041,0.0039413488,0.003782917,0.0011363643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024968436,0.0005113895,0.00070499396,0.002274456,0.0050966935,0.012638795,0.0031959186,0.020413201,0.008753544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034388255,0.0005371535,0.00061957876,0.0019610324,0.03294805,0.017000977,0.007598376,0.010621238,0.0020966898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001304885,0.0000111819945,0.00039191413,0.00010520618,0.000005786285,0.00026910007,0.0009332946,0.00013278321,0.000109908906,0.9651401,0.0119738355,0.02091382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008438766,0.000040052113,0.00048257617,0.0016183814,0.000014002384,0.0012703657,0.0016798406,0.0005155303,0.0006733834,0.7429753,0.25068277,0.00003937795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035054267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021638318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024968436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005271081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009025196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13204724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W38524600","doi":"10.29173/alr368","title":"Recent Judicial Developments of Interest to Oil and Gas Lawyers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freehold; Fossil fuel; Law; Government (linguistics); Judicial review; Energy law; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Environmental law; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1103150384777167,"score_gpt":0.35085352382388235,"score_spread":0.24053848534616565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W38524600","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024428098,0.66921335,0.00087258016,0.11536845,0.0024384009,0.00007695482,0.00062638544,0.0000785188,0.18689722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25864372,0.6590195,0.0022214737,0.038404964,0.0036827375,0.000035507648,0.0007019237,0.000053429354,0.037236817],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889607,0.0010729562,0.0005086668,0.0009140769,0.006687973,0.0018556305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96263254,0.009678508,0.0026060273,0.00040385345,0.022810576,0.0018684488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010492744,0.00036261446,0.0005134715,0.010788302,0.0063970406,0.009832516,0.0024775336,0.0040931497,0.0073240367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024985803,0.00069826265,0.0005022448,0.016669767,0.0068433564,0.0017569462,0.0012509765,0.004147285,0.0006476951],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102565,0.00010157019,0.006425051,0.0032559067,0.000105243875,0.001208431,0.0062674303,0.00180814,0.001176949,0.2769837,0.3286517,0.37391332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021806303,0.00002590548,0.019883147,0.0011514969,0.00006096785,0.00028919737,0.0022637232,0.00022524646,0.00032760916,0.0040834406,0.9715915,0.00007595681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94283706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.981644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8988614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1011386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12384684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7338153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W38735234","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104307","title":"Family Law Rules: Rule 42- Appointment of family case manager in the family court of the Superior Court of Justice in Ottawa","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Ergonomics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Campbell Soup Company; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality","keywords":"Law; Family court; Economic Justice; Family law; High Court; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.017151541332203,"score_gpt":0.26543569037176307,"score_spread":0.24828414903956006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W38735234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40055147,0.002088234,0.003407907,0.093281895,0.0020793322,0.001327922,0.0033113342,0.00033128788,0.49362063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70041174,0.00068109063,0.002102189,0.016939217,0.00014659188,0.00015427207,0.00045569436,0.0000773334,0.27903184],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952625,0.00053164724,0.00033371546,0.00090597325,0.00083581725,0.0021302814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99384034,0.0018349128,0.00050142827,0.00036324502,0.0014738098,0.0019862233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033007136,0.00034418303,0.00034272397,0.0009174773,0.030790571,0.0050002392,0.0030681037,0.0074892594,0.035366226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012194408,0.000919332,0.00041547773,0.00074682885,0.004269248,0.0016702055,0.002779245,0.0056433077,0.0023731817],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027249285,0.00030628341,0.091408074,0.00027696948,0.00009829778,0.050529107,0.082380354,0.0012141387,0.0038494684,0.12127599,0.59583914,0.052549627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006612788,0.00010570874,0.08989021,0.00042892568,0.00009498135,0.005844203,0.092455804,0.0009263316,0.0026364406,0.0071599623,0.8001216,0.0002696542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.906358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97456825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.093642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03856172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06268374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27978617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W399115648","doi":"","title":"Originalism: A Quarter-Century of Debate","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Federalist; Constitution; Original meaning; Law; Economic Justice; Quarter (Canadian coin); Meaning (existential); Political science; Sociology; History; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.018954366920051317,"score_gpt":0.30526493557333045,"score_spread":0.28631056865327914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W399115648","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013662559,0.083256036,0.0006589644,0.8828518,0.017011907,0.0000072911425,0.00006525882,0.000021486649,0.014760921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16070218,0.10996539,0.0018889405,0.62573975,0.08491244,0.000108280736,0.00021880175,0.000303901,0.01616038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9324651,0.04009109,0.0029801293,0.0061216145,0.014694068,0.0036480331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89377904,0.08041993,0.0028011603,0.0065940875,0.011991703,0.0044141375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.059908208,0.00089154585,0.002256695,0.00542077,0.01541779,0.030537011,0.005983165,0.02876154,0.010458777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08390233,0.000714623,0.0013422935,0.008490536,0.083000064,0.050744582,0.012070513,0.032240592,0.0026266386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007477885,0.000057919893,0.00020658229,0.00053441245,0.000026410955,0.00016551062,0.020274676,0.00014315735,0.00009498287,0.6013867,0.32820415,0.048830613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020908437,0.000013878988,0.00022091981,0.0014316771,0.0000070029823,0.00011045395,0.015280698,0.00014044082,0.000062043364,0.1780612,0.80461955,0.000031192245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076093217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004885276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059908208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022414103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015516338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31682867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205154769","doi":"10.22215/etd/2021-14731","title":"Genetic Discrimination and Beyond – A Proposal for Ethical Life Insurance","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Exceptionalism; Genetic discrimination; Life insurance; Actuarial science; Genetic testing; Insurance policy; Test (biology); Luck; Law and economics; Legislation; Business; Law; Economics; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.018527207158352054,"score_gpt":0.33097100874542384,"score_spread":0.3124438015870718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205154769","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0076477346,0.0033033,0.008378717,0.80719477,0.0036569254,0.000057899248,0.000028474758,0.000020789708,0.16971135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50812864,0.005017754,0.016082667,0.25591883,0.007770379,0.00036150834,0.000062165134,0.00007887315,0.20657918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950736,0.0028432736,0.00010419253,0.00041422504,0.00085168227,0.0007130174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959275,0.002213042,0.00022972866,0.0003194861,0.00051925564,0.0007909295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010805071,0.0003404071,0.00042552565,0.00056840415,0.0044448585,0.0058962847,0.001373978,0.014635337,0.006666553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01552256,0.00022480827,0.00051637634,0.00038248766,0.019250466,0.0062022293,0.003798537,0.011754029,0.0014002816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004933048,0.000014406177,0.000060678136,0.0000058054593,0.0000012737102,0.00006163708,0.0005165606,0.00010395373,0.000051982588,0.98007995,0.016676484,0.0024223884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012130434,0.000017564978,0.0001255058,0.00008680933,0.0000022591885,0.00007929591,0.0010912769,0.0003892797,0.00009987347,0.8866463,0.11143488,0.000014851069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013547905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002228113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014635337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031081825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006380616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05714333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226020095","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4056228","title":"A Mighty Fortress is Our Court: Abusive Litigant Abatement at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Fortress (chess); Political science; History","score_opus":0.009965136432084788,"score_gpt":0.259841814722693,"score_spread":0.24987667829060822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226020095","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5401152,0.005322729,0.0017915824,0.2090709,0.0011036473,0.0002112576,0.00054162845,0.00007423241,0.2417689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9245201,0.0015240569,0.0006428067,0.016996901,0.00014327002,0.000031496627,0.00007131556,0.000041439143,0.056028545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992349,0.00074178295,0.00010742832,0.00059658184,0.0017958144,0.0044093123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943178,0.0017203606,0.0002277566,0.00011924849,0.0020367594,0.0015781468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036187046,0.0004401871,0.0007453155,0.0015509622,0.046256684,0.011492727,0.0035905663,0.015760643,0.012989538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016521303,0.0006340493,0.0006305036,0.0021961534,0.008225895,0.0028074486,0.0033443768,0.013450377,0.0006685128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030712696,0.00032448478,0.038700115,0.00015248197,0.00019653492,0.0066578817,0.04440687,0.004090797,0.0012003593,0.607955,0.25375608,0.042252257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029553735,0.00020220049,0.101379976,0.00075641513,0.0008075195,0.0016460455,0.22083977,0.012715598,0.003446384,0.1463639,0.5107951,0.0007514723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99391854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99815875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10260033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10260033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21343134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.744421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229795280","doi":"10.1089/glre.2011.16315","title":"<i>Pineau v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation</i> <i>Case No. CV-10-00399497, [2011] O.J. No. 4360, 2011 ON.C. LEXIS 9344, 2011 ONSC 5822 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, October 5, 2011)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Lexis; Download; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web; Mathematics; Philosophy; Statistics","score_opus":0.03211866439953598,"score_gpt":0.25939014346978134,"score_spread":0.22727147907024536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229795280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007996306,0.0045747324,0.0005170159,0.038611285,0.000711598,0.00025043433,0.0064643393,0.00016491879,0.94070935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10294102,0.003787987,0.0010091978,0.064489864,0.00035001544,0.00032687967,0.0027229807,0.00010874672,0.8242633],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756265,0.00013983283,0.00007977912,0.00018680889,0.0012386783,0.0007922984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979316,0.00048323584,0.00014519319,0.00008210082,0.0010983567,0.0002595977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013265907,0.00057349226,0.0003512569,0.0015712685,0.013630898,0.004936231,0.0020561903,0.0059960512,0.03951311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044981535,0.0008419044,0.0006478652,0.0022287278,0.0024015433,0.0016644084,0.001179082,0.0029036836,0.0059905513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033362798,0.000018758039,0.0018852509,0.00008334208,0.000009594942,0.0002587816,0.0010427426,0.000058709764,0.0002654166,0.0615261,0.92941046,0.0054074675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003055092,0.00001933436,0.019721039,0.00020015452,0.000029267383,0.000118444885,0.0011240868,0.00024805445,0.0003892695,0.004079978,0.9739947,0.000045196826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95717305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9899395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04282695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03041915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04633986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22070742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230516726","doi":"10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim030310344","title":"The Story of an Illusion: The Plan to Trade the 'Alabama' Claims for Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"The SHAFR Guide Online","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Illusion; Plan (archaeology); History; Psychology; Archaeology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.03726105557574012,"score_gpt":0.36292009114538787,"score_spread":0.32565903556964776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230516726","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031768356,0.00046501608,0.00013121348,0.0031774128,0.00016070709,0.00001655619,0.98498154,0.00025898387,0.007631869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012296433,0.00046279698,0.0005113619,0.00052972266,0.00005752144,0.00006931519,0.97795606,0.00012904342,0.007987707],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990158,0.00013354543,0.0000588125,0.00011080094,0.00041817114,0.00026291478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953874,0.0012560214,0.00032544864,0.0005909345,0.0019457971,0.00049441046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012842629,0.00083261647,0.0005738548,0.0038945375,0.002744586,0.0044631776,0.0020137785,0.0022897108,0.02941672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010569591,0.00040844825,0.0006366549,0.006521424,0.0009672371,0.0021195323,0.0022419475,0.0030322196,0.014124525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020728257,0.000008320766,0.002138496,0.000078450335,0.0000067379956,0.00002501171,0.00008120365,0.0001641088,0.000013674892,0.0017345259,0.993885,0.0018438391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008283192,0.0000054299994,0.012945341,0.00036341627,0.000017287237,0.00006549427,0.0013756182,0.0013116999,0.0002178388,0.0034347533,0.9801514,0.000028953162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73850185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90101486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26149815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008782579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014756678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5260763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231016205","doi":"10.1089/glr2.2017.2176","title":"SAADATI v. MOORHEADCase No. 36703; 2017 SCC 28 (Supreme Court of Canada, June 2, 2017)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04692567298294598,"score_gpt":0.33077687592443095,"score_spread":0.28385120294148497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231016205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015618204,0.0051266393,0.000950085,0.049980998,0.001757949,0.0002851243,0.0035883216,0.00027755025,0.9224151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09597118,0.0030901327,0.0014860217,0.07064593,0.00041132825,0.00023190521,0.0014259613,0.00012434449,0.8266132],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99510396,0.00021976783,0.00010780734,0.00029388364,0.0028339205,0.0014405478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99635494,0.0006509496,0.00009306375,0.00009532759,0.002373609,0.00043208041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024691336,0.0005772884,0.0004834662,0.0018056701,0.018137947,0.0082134325,0.002038986,0.009225739,0.028715229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075968266,0.000753612,0.0008143127,0.0018726579,0.002976044,0.0014976178,0.0015875159,0.00646916,0.006724585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005183865,0.000036262623,0.0025532187,0.00008549055,0.000017786311,0.00037338978,0.0012787253,0.0001468932,0.00045481438,0.14217298,0.8412705,0.011558029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041270898,0.000023740036,0.0076132603,0.00030690336,0.00004987164,0.00015419904,0.0013528606,0.00036828,0.00077104004,0.008551786,0.9807062,0.000060507424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.931478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9822885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06852198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024550844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09684791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17812967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231234638","doi":"10.1089/glre.2008.13111","title":"Bear Hills Charitable Foundation v. Alberta (Gaming and Liquor Commission), <i>[2008] A.J. No. 1431</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Foundation (evidence); Download; Political science; Library science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.015426669396747698,"score_gpt":0.2679643827990066,"score_spread":0.2525377134022589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231234638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016236166,0.0055889697,0.0008444087,0.055828437,0.0011003355,0.00016798062,0.003179704,0.0002963961,0.9167576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.114888504,0.0029564914,0.0010300638,0.078120485,0.00030161053,0.0001237547,0.0013013309,0.00006944161,0.8012082],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745375,0.0001545803,0.000062759034,0.00015650659,0.0012901922,0.0008821308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824023,0.00041348918,0.00008978306,0.0000525238,0.0009307571,0.00027315505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016038966,0.0005841216,0.0003504812,0.0015200588,0.013933275,0.00779519,0.0022402466,0.010434491,0.025491456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043320595,0.000898446,0.0005772587,0.0017957225,0.0026777226,0.00147477,0.0011212619,0.00450111,0.004029038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043115026,0.000049514943,0.0038335766,0.00008501134,0.000016100877,0.00031478718,0.0013797394,0.00019707362,0.00041208026,0.118997365,0.8643339,0.01033769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051357227,0.000045616856,0.027029864,0.00032044834,0.00006838282,0.0001428208,0.0027781557,0.00058762735,0.0009870816,0.011652733,0.9562348,0.0001010887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9290683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9808091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07093167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021242898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04058151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15412879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232095161","doi":"10.4135/9781412971966.n166","title":"Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Encyclopedia of African American Education","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.008305614785608956,"score_gpt":0.27743689446464015,"score_spread":0.26913127967903117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232095161","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041643707,0.0026191843,0.0001824506,0.013910576,0.0004957096,0.00007719538,0.006313875,0.000222131,0.97201455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028126607,0.0019651323,0.0001961668,0.009188558,0.000076777986,0.000049558406,0.001099733,0.0000582753,0.9592392],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984958,0.0000705435,0.000035022123,0.00010642867,0.0007539704,0.0005382295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812776,0.00031155886,0.00005238797,0.00007227699,0.0012113547,0.00022471497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071825215,0.00052493275,0.0004724996,0.0021858509,0.01316029,0.004970103,0.001345652,0.0052938415,0.10462231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034062576,0.00060277653,0.00033674357,0.0028664377,0.0012076946,0.001463995,0.0012292877,0.0033630242,0.020743564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025964915,0.00003292038,0.0013072195,0.000078708654,0.000003910352,0.00026368257,0.00040148955,0.00007733999,0.000166128,0.036161587,0.9456703,0.015810693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022919376,0.000011358235,0.0062708287,0.0002449193,0.00001360378,0.0000804814,0.0006023932,0.00014812725,0.00030173635,0.00297335,0.98930514,0.000025218578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9350854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98237854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9350854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022109948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058695994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34999645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233383303","doi":"10.1163/1570-6664_iyb_sim_person_26466","title":"Fridman, Prof. Gerald Henry Louis, MA, BCL, LL.M, QC (Ontario), FRSC","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"International Year Book and Statesmen's Who's Who","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"St louis; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.011119779279840127,"score_gpt":0.2809018343251173,"score_spread":0.26978205504527714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233383303","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025350694,0.00023789803,0.00014798708,0.00046297684,0.00008611569,0.00001746489,0.9938929,0.00041008674,0.004491063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009512332,0.00019988863,0.0004359073,0.00014591732,0.000033404485,0.00006745626,0.98996615,0.00011479568,0.008085132],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989845,0.00017344214,0.00007843578,0.00030883658,0.00030809612,0.00014667072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99631554,0.00071478006,0.0002985902,0.0007022825,0.001355893,0.0006129674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015504261,0.0012440427,0.0010518363,0.0036560057,0.0009875958,0.0027999058,0.0017959849,0.0011361538,0.10020343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008591543,0.0004888179,0.0007022674,0.004263523,0.00038291508,0.0013523232,0.0014922242,0.0013986696,0.16126408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016351187,0.000003904518,0.0007201548,0.00005678216,0.0000030252334,0.000003960593,0.000005059375,0.0000509848,0.0000117843165,0.00016957226,0.99686986,0.0020885523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055438028,0.0000056097797,0.004113908,0.00013025175,0.000008654749,0.000027209398,0.000059084767,0.0003539107,0.00011491672,0.00060030015,0.99451965,0.000011146818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09599133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23393506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9040087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024969748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040505407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33521384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233760448","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20910","title":"Paton Estate v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Commission (c.o.b. Fallsview Casino Resort)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Estate; Commission; Download; Real estate; Advertising; Business; Political science; Law; Economics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02501758896512817,"score_gpt":0.26404554970336713,"score_spread":0.23902796073823895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233760448","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030136513,0.00429126,0.00070593244,0.025078397,0.00039420504,0.0002028081,0.0027633654,0.00012428936,0.9363032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17177783,0.0023545055,0.00069414475,0.01292908,0.00011405114,0.00009428986,0.00070422457,0.00003653475,0.8112954],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859697,0.000058922717,0.000028185954,0.000088822286,0.0008293321,0.00039772099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988575,0.00019797472,0.00005397143,0.000032528536,0.0006206741,0.0002373387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007228326,0.0002831838,0.0001947253,0.0008295386,0.012041401,0.0037276098,0.00085051707,0.0031774712,0.03698355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023255243,0.0005066755,0.00030854187,0.0010865052,0.001540506,0.00082298956,0.0007980182,0.001710681,0.0031590597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065400935,0.00004260544,0.0113968775,0.000117932155,0.000013567157,0.0006777246,0.0016931072,0.00016236732,0.00089696655,0.07197611,0.8842387,0.028718678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005909832,0.000035165893,0.057059616,0.00018742758,0.000047038495,0.00024456333,0.0015610441,0.00057104137,0.000912089,0.003842861,0.93543136,0.00004862784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95556796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99331784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044432044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02129945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035788823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15453905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235374131","doi":"10.1002/9780470015902.a0005188","title":"Genetic Information Access, a Legal Perspective: A Duty to Know or a Right Not to Know, and a Duty or Option to Warn?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Encyclopedia of Life Sciences","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Right to know; Harm; Duty to warn; Duty; Genetic testing; Legislation; Perspective (graphical); Internet privacy; Personally identifiable information; Confidentiality; Genetic engineering; Need to know; Psychology; Political science; Law; Social psychology; Medicine; Computer security; Computer science; Genetics","score_opus":0.018785663983132497,"score_gpt":0.33304394215067723,"score_spread":0.31425827816754476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235374131","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069380654,0.012951726,0.0039147153,0.5033795,0.0014393154,0.000033981123,0.00009808489,0.000024120021,0.47122052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6927733,0.022656688,0.006456845,0.19829142,0.005042657,0.0001973352,0.00011679554,0.000082546816,0.07438246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828707,0.011201988,0.00063904445,0.0011227613,0.0028779376,0.0012874935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96343875,0.028696597,0.0014016539,0.001380222,0.003352291,0.0017305606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01626563,0.00037422776,0.0007041117,0.0020287451,0.009193173,0.016815491,0.0019248374,0.020103736,0.0158603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026815161,0.00027032988,0.0003731096,0.0027418751,0.049529966,0.012028082,0.005763697,0.013585786,0.0013615639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021442522,0.000008714662,0.00007199676,0.000018091068,9.601064e-7,0.00008693018,0.0019161884,0.000031032643,0.00001737677,0.98515344,0.010423245,0.0022699435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014640785,0.000013443752,0.00045447674,0.0006667481,0.000006272374,0.00040342528,0.009926525,0.00036051727,0.000087460525,0.7583631,0.2296798,0.000023553848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014924874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013000975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020103736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008777469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010647471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0860219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236248285","doi":"10.1089/1092188042380095","title":"Ontario Superior Court of Justice: &lt;I&gt;MGM Grand Hotel Inc. v Chu&lt;/I&gt;","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Art","score_opus":0.025415346161760704,"score_gpt":0.29378179329766596,"score_spread":0.26836644713590524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236248285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022429273,0.00341404,0.0005688826,0.06015136,0.0010670804,0.00031874623,0.005370455,0.00016327247,0.90651685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11275607,0.0015022912,0.0008502354,0.017596323,0.00020748895,0.00011399694,0.00079272385,0.00008249831,0.8660984],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695754,0.00013925326,0.000076013086,0.00022196438,0.0016179036,0.000987355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965035,0.0004279615,0.00010201619,0.00009545889,0.0022415756,0.00062946836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014174707,0.00055967463,0.00039527062,0.0015280538,0.018707857,0.005496863,0.0015267608,0.005281319,0.050614092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004153391,0.0008012758,0.0005689798,0.0018838051,0.0023047065,0.001104443,0.0010299437,0.004249358,0.0044591646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060041675,0.000031525826,0.0047174133,0.00011128812,0.000020956672,0.00042983328,0.0013681221,0.00013488058,0.0005619125,0.091750845,0.8919912,0.008822138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005427232,0.000021768521,0.026172196,0.00019087686,0.000050395814,0.000110673085,0.0015801197,0.00049244054,0.00066983694,0.0037108639,0.96687984,0.00006663512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9859372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99742895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07272213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07272213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11535708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52763844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236249296","doi":"10.5703/1288284316502","title":"The Long Arm of the Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Purdue Pharma (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.028009260210386074,"score_gpt":0.3265348339630232,"score_spread":0.2985255737526371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236249296","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014874174,0.03221257,0.025591658,0.5729387,0.0071178414,0.00005495161,0.00051371084,0.00017018127,0.34652624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6223315,0.014326698,0.0102084,0.14279418,0.019025406,0.00021885392,0.00030098986,0.00012435718,0.19066963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980925,0.0006521091,0.000067979774,0.0005211661,0.00047356327,0.00019273991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99485755,0.002816497,0.00036439786,0.0006634695,0.00096167694,0.0003363369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002516178,0.00034476904,0.00048926304,0.0010031004,0.0032513535,0.009006556,0.0010664302,0.008599011,0.021364342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009143281,0.0002119298,0.00030840863,0.0011810968,0.011451608,0.01330298,0.002184733,0.0066000624,0.0043358947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000110283545,0.0000059634276,0.00017424334,0.000027881111,0.0000037773088,0.000020860192,0.00022854976,0.00004461082,0.0000651083,0.9714414,0.021539712,0.0064370697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012835865,0.000011028376,0.0006134612,0.00011509293,0.000004153633,0.000045859546,0.0003876994,0.00028835385,0.00008250603,0.87462795,0.12379465,0.000016375867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005327534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045316895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021364342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002575042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020517616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0714708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237249097","doi":"10.1037/e629382007-001","title":"Same-Sex Marriage in Canada: Evolution or Revolution?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"PsycEXTRA Dataset","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual revolution; Genealogy; Demography; History; Geography; Sociology; Gender studies; Human sexuality","score_opus":0.025429042485166038,"score_gpt":0.31165501054295563,"score_spread":0.2862259680577896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237249097","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029785803,0.00019223595,0.000042644304,0.00026600258,0.000018280665,0.0000128279025,0.9956204,0.000071531715,0.0007974162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009930548,0.00033137485,0.00024054754,0.000097008306,0.0000128269685,0.00007586573,0.98615706,0.0000374071,0.003117361],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989467,0.0000821972,0.00009812146,0.000193656,0.00033450386,0.0003447917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936785,0.0009483052,0.000722382,0.0007670138,0.0030881015,0.00079571817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009912607,0.0011818914,0.0012656401,0.00712443,0.0022819769,0.003284795,0.0033580016,0.0017580816,0.021202506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00836701,0.00074702426,0.0012643406,0.019905634,0.000687154,0.0008692324,0.0014424758,0.0022637297,0.0075337524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014274598,0.000046923866,0.028138062,0.00036339488,0.00009941678,0.000060390706,0.0001832505,0.0009326156,0.000057100217,0.0015520605,0.96116775,0.0072563216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034499494,0.000021497219,0.29815972,0.00071065215,0.00021811515,0.000112992515,0.0011880858,0.0035643622,0.00056587067,0.0012944462,0.69371456,0.00010472706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98470366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9906544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021202506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019423366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047475703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14092702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237988032","doi":"10.29173/alr403","title":"An Introduction to Various Issues Surrounding the Ownership of Storage/Pipeline Gas","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Energy","funders":"","keywords":"Pipeline (software); Insolvency; Leasehold estate; Law and economics; Business; Natural gas; Class (philosophy); Economics; Law; Political science; Computer science; Finance; Engineering","score_opus":0.028446587593752366,"score_gpt":0.35086296297317937,"score_spread":0.322416375379427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237988032","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012668364,0.04819503,0.0071648755,0.09055376,0.0021700016,0.00019183016,0.00045052473,0.00009541626,0.83851016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37033144,0.08502476,0.009833839,0.06327478,0.0039217123,0.00018426908,0.0003094148,0.000111102934,0.46700874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706984,0.000505344,0.00011077722,0.00014086073,0.0015552205,0.0006180113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976369,0.0015837387,0.00013048331,0.00006397919,0.00048714638,0.00009779656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002277831,0.00038789024,0.00031603622,0.0023455168,0.009149607,0.006306115,0.0015773944,0.005470854,0.008390231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033715246,0.00043195547,0.0006253294,0.0033812209,0.013812131,0.0033621215,0.0016657852,0.0054521,0.00076443405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003824379,0.000014074237,0.00044577575,0.0000828001,0.0000016530787,0.000461006,0.0031041305,0.000249557,0.0002797647,0.9258098,0.056031846,0.013515708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038038313,0.000021045185,0.003612918,0.0004057641,0.000008236415,0.00042175793,0.0037225832,0.0003436669,0.00036676702,0.07736568,0.9136906,0.00003716742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55137247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68700135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44862753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019786721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0150434915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9025392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239831365","doi":"10.1037/e513792004-001","title":"Gay rights, marriage, and the Supreme Court","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"PsycEXTRA Dataset","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Gay rights; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02721996703560543,"score_gpt":0.3259147545694934,"score_spread":0.298694787533888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239831365","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003944878,0.00008775655,0.000037379323,0.00041857664,0.000052190866,0.00000745617,0.99778265,0.00010784373,0.0011116943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017625461,0.00012841912,0.00018303824,0.00009911826,0.000030132709,0.00009256088,0.99600875,0.00003788817,0.0016574358],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988563,0.00024110537,0.00015847191,0.00021285369,0.0003606957,0.00017059731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99325514,0.0022312151,0.00092984276,0.0013474228,0.0015650194,0.00067145075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013489679,0.0010075383,0.00086817,0.003610374,0.0013622708,0.0029324272,0.0021002155,0.0013644211,0.054946117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009654319,0.00059139566,0.0009155339,0.009145169,0.0004492861,0.0015684569,0.0019483875,0.0023199464,0.049749434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033040218,0.000015058748,0.0016956303,0.00011704697,0.00000632514,0.000010895509,0.000021587946,0.000110704605,0.000010373877,0.00033542034,0.995214,0.0024300192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029559818,0.00002596281,0.043603424,0.0003697981,0.000029744884,0.000048754795,0.00034683122,0.00085738994,0.00027427962,0.002585523,0.95152974,0.00003296059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07065442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.112269886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07065442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029269294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003839962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1838131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239987928","doi":"10.29173/alr72","title":"Recent Judicial Developments of Interest to Energy Lawyers","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receivership; Freehold; Duty; Energy sector; Judicial opinion; Energy (signal processing); Actuarial science; Business; Economics; Law; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.058509107799009856,"score_gpt":0.3200448532691088,"score_spread":0.26153574547009895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239987928","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024421575,0.30106044,0.0022797664,0.41015476,0.008722735,0.000059963768,0.00023171166,0.0001086938,0.25296032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.373776,0.2594784,0.004390978,0.2551137,0.029979313,0.00007949005,0.00045781594,0.00009187878,0.07663244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858686,0.003569622,0.00074814144,0.0015521073,0.006510741,0.0017507696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9516759,0.030789835,0.0033595844,0.0010194846,0.011985773,0.0011694658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016638985,0.0003056466,0.00053232006,0.004239302,0.0069055967,0.011899096,0.0028316139,0.014866023,0.006559397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04308024,0.00088819885,0.0006299708,0.0063985167,0.0075406507,0.004090884,0.0019040512,0.010552555,0.0011389783],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050307746,0.000104740815,0.00150428,0.000914832,0.0000434025,0.0014515946,0.0033738152,0.0010636996,0.0009803704,0.5902093,0.26759824,0.13270545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025368221,0.000036011697,0.0040124487,0.0008032818,0.000035006244,0.00037703782,0.0017373994,0.00034312258,0.00041882705,0.02813097,0.9640257,0.00005488432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08425693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21533577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08425693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018139496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017411701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16753304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240039888","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.18615","title":"Nova Growth Corp. v. Kepinski <i>2014 CarswellOnt 6335, 2014 ONSC 2763 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice [Commercial List], May 12, 2014</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Download; Economic Justice; CITES; Law; Humanities; Politics; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.02529310089975424,"score_gpt":0.2676874636780195,"score_spread":0.24239436277826526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240039888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010326949,0.0014332721,0.0004724384,0.019314101,0.00036855208,0.00016852187,0.003942309,0.00009864145,0.9638751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.057247624,0.0011874642,0.0006485113,0.02109036,0.000100400095,0.00013459999,0.001809215,0.000061041326,0.91772085],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973232,0.00015078198,0.000084150895,0.00023188588,0.0014351655,0.0007748667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975485,0.00038472947,0.00010340949,0.000070065646,0.001627686,0.00026546043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013354154,0.00056399294,0.0002596004,0.0015232916,0.012784054,0.0050448063,0.0015777008,0.004697895,0.04399895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004541216,0.00077636505,0.0005347148,0.0012768247,0.0017403566,0.0018240581,0.0014033321,0.0037647055,0.009158244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050173843,0.000034084696,0.0035966476,0.00009059397,0.000010576129,0.0002586486,0.0009305322,0.00012766369,0.0005465177,0.09310636,0.8912645,0.009983734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029017408,0.000022819984,0.016902871,0.00017957801,0.000024946316,0.00013044573,0.001148253,0.0003553802,0.00081935304,0.00442808,0.975904,0.000055242414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8642535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97719884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13574648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023451565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03537131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2730918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240456741","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.17911","title":"Dennis v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming CorpCase No. C55923, [2013] O.J. No. 3468; 2013 ON.C. LEXIS 3610; 2013 ONCA 501 (Ontario Court of Appeal, July 31, 2013)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Appeal; Lexis; Art; Humanities; Download; Advertising; Art history; Political science; Law; Computer science; Business; World Wide Web; Philosophy; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.024288057881616046,"score_gpt":0.24798813914238224,"score_spread":0.22370008126076618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240456741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012081527,0.004124055,0.0007492864,0.01711952,0.00037711102,0.00025906748,0.006033322,0.00014191747,0.95911413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08739591,0.0024652346,0.00095845025,0.014355675,0.000119363394,0.00019828032,0.001579175,0.000050080125,0.89287794],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997858,0.00008625993,0.0000512259,0.00014248712,0.0012984462,0.0005635126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842876,0.00024475026,0.00006607768,0.00004558445,0.00096887694,0.0002459548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012187706,0.00056049705,0.00028811765,0.0012820447,0.0151398545,0.0038208175,0.001274282,0.004018581,0.052911095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003558361,0.0008686011,0.00049743557,0.0015159183,0.001670418,0.0012562446,0.0009852283,0.0019566761,0.005946673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007531568,0.000033095836,0.005465231,0.00013120951,0.000013982645,0.00027931124,0.0011862392,0.00012118588,0.0004984925,0.0866248,0.8910212,0.014549911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007198797,0.000028924007,0.030325059,0.00020456873,0.000044154425,0.00015119482,0.000994833,0.00040746137,0.00056798424,0.004411192,0.96273077,0.00006194481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9702774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99501723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052911095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031745236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05937664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23032892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241150343","doi":"10.1093/acref/9780195301731.013.45917","title":"Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"African American Studies Center","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.0316661190525865,"score_gpt":0.31537282752406665,"score_spread":0.28370670847148016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241150343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011014318,0.0026722546,0.00034024921,0.022917356,0.0006536883,0.00012303154,0.0071086325,0.00024987664,0.95492053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.054514516,0.0015905871,0.00033597302,0.013091602,0.00009725229,0.00006868247,0.0011427702,0.000057558453,0.92910117],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808,0.00010491916,0.0000463101,0.00014352953,0.00091234274,0.0007128932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99715936,0.00050546555,0.00007264892,0.00010436274,0.0018296549,0.00032857445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010824745,0.00050156756,0.000493656,0.0020086372,0.01785312,0.0045843557,0.0015022762,0.0058635455,0.07012664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004464619,0.0006292165,0.00034741353,0.0024167474,0.0013740675,0.001204657,0.0012816301,0.0041148644,0.011368444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000460757,0.000050344705,0.003301896,0.00007851214,0.000007202525,0.0004117759,0.0008047405,0.000114228504,0.00026944096,0.060838923,0.9173601,0.016716726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045835634,0.000023840748,0.01744042,0.0003322394,0.00002926132,0.00013610977,0.0012611167,0.0003071221,0.00060785824,0.005188125,0.9745807,0.00004740151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9449542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9867959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07012664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02206709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059861723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23459697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242191756","doi":"10.1163/2213-2996_flg_com_323010","title":"Canada - Legal System","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Foreign Law Guide","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.016399944525404112,"score_gpt":0.27733520371517756,"score_spread":0.26093525918977345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242191756","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006239355,0.00004131311,0.000016626249,0.00005318649,0.00000984403,0.000005961352,0.9987955,0.00014787882,0.00086715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00031229338,0.00008263611,0.00014496146,0.000057233858,0.0000047883177,0.000034011602,0.9975303,0.000090154404,0.0017436682],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836653,0.00014198311,0.00012190362,0.00033951222,0.0005642284,0.00046591595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924696,0.0012639336,0.0004549326,0.0010316777,0.0037804293,0.0009995193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001022042,0.0024721962,0.0015944389,0.010941337,0.0023710842,0.0052345293,0.0032077085,0.0025038312,0.14431788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009947806,0.001131724,0.0016346213,0.020512966,0.0009269379,0.0017144955,0.002160657,0.0030338778,0.1418499],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016985263,0.000007793199,0.0004236073,0.0001538593,0.000008684992,0.000006673942,0.000015017201,0.00010793521,0.000016220689,0.00042342514,0.9977818,0.0010381404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012984037,0.0000059563313,0.003977431,0.0003366674,0.000021581982,0.000018663119,0.00011978098,0.00037734007,0.0001285842,0.0010524525,0.99380386,0.000027831526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80388975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8716377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98928285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010717176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027625669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48279142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242221348","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.17910","title":"Ontario First Nations Limited Partnership v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corp. <i>Case No. CV-12-461369, [2013] O.J. No. 2800; 2013 ON.C. LEXIS 2992; 2013 ONSC 4166 (Ontario Court of Justice, June 17, 2013)</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Lexis; General partnership; Download; Law; Political science; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.03532596529928986,"score_gpt":0.2548350094174521,"score_spread":0.21950904411816222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242221348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009224055,0.0036076664,0.00054272806,0.023663323,0.00038666112,0.00021193444,0.0046972,0.00009894593,0.9575676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11758973,0.0031289365,0.0010176253,0.025485959,0.0001435549,0.000216223,0.0018107236,0.00007394318,0.85053325],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973109,0.00013879657,0.000059790465,0.00013678789,0.0015721886,0.0007816213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979462,0.000332675,0.00010517676,0.000057538753,0.0012016612,0.0003567292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012720635,0.0005037236,0.00023530897,0.0014266369,0.015040136,0.004071752,0.0013293112,0.003780618,0.037222568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003722775,0.0007182485,0.00049694814,0.0019270722,0.002083285,0.0014048195,0.0010626541,0.0020059575,0.0043001412],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042921718,0.000021598456,0.004410098,0.000117853924,0.000010897778,0.00028785173,0.0017436902,0.00010576706,0.0003835804,0.08025972,0.9032307,0.009385384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035616962,0.000020732597,0.022614263,0.00018233876,0.000029561734,0.00012009245,0.0015074242,0.00029131817,0.00053805026,0.0039862185,0.9706251,0.000049298673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9794805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044444088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044444088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07402895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3224659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242254569","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.18111","title":"Michigan vs. The Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians <i>Case No. 13-1438, 2013 WL 6645395 (U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, December 18, 2013)</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribe; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01944810771552718,"score_gpt":0.2532683744881838,"score_spread":0.2338202667726566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242254569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072298676,0.0043533803,0.00041967985,0.07864242,0.0007163902,0.00009271852,0.0013617404,0.000110938534,0.842004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41309765,0.0023110963,0.00043061722,0.07899239,0.00061123166,0.0003111206,0.0004665841,0.00006996199,0.5037094],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922,0.000110770015,0.000014852473,0.00009200084,0.00018144197,0.0003809581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992274,0.0003024287,0.00005334113,0.000028332179,0.00018908367,0.00019944666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082966516,0.0003674834,0.00025404035,0.0007452818,0.015601002,0.004377897,0.0013244698,0.0053025614,0.029006323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002319239,0.00044528762,0.0003151883,0.0008390813,0.0018333372,0.0011477049,0.0015283936,0.0040303855,0.0028934896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012731776,0.0000628127,0.007975134,0.00011141777,0.00003278799,0.0013895523,0.0044141817,0.00009829387,0.00081193977,0.15678087,0.8114403,0.016755493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000633707,0.00007920741,0.054456886,0.000507324,0.00009792888,0.00053621747,0.010411355,0.00061661,0.0020032616,0.008054469,0.9230943,0.00007921467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34962255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7261503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34962255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046780067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005213199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69517505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242279659","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.161112","title":"<i>R. v. Trins</i> <i>Case No. A10-7330-30Z; [2012] A.J. No. 600; 2012 ABPC 156; 2012 AB.C. LEXIS 1108 (Alberta Provincial Court, June 11, 2012)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01901146512330852,"score_gpt":0.26681222964717793,"score_spread":0.2478007645238694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242279659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032864998,0.0024910027,0.0005518094,0.034115806,0.00091170287,0.0001701461,0.0028172971,0.00037455466,0.9552812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05461008,0.0014928364,0.0009958799,0.10233178,0.00040665365,0.00021058963,0.0016363288,0.00017417931,0.8381417],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976042,0.00020415892,0.0000812897,0.0002292572,0.0010507432,0.0008304306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976482,0.0006743247,0.00013798077,0.00010118415,0.0011736464,0.0002647898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017262807,0.0007656457,0.0005285048,0.0017818443,0.010723441,0.005757172,0.002517992,0.009683902,0.056586772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060086055,0.00091461197,0.00074296584,0.0015775589,0.0020002879,0.0015928214,0.0014970275,0.0058276462,0.01873475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023053135,0.000019313746,0.00070175197,0.00004595616,0.0000057912343,0.00017303329,0.00035573775,0.000070341724,0.00020331684,0.058568183,0.93534106,0.0044925213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031994387,0.000032173255,0.008262801,0.00030014428,0.000027286193,0.00021014003,0.0009417208,0.0003760257,0.0006463004,0.010447102,0.9786709,0.000053354477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6201146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83715594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6201146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011114836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019270191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76424515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243198121","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14412","title":"Dennis v. Ontario Lottery &amp; Gaming Corp., <i>[2010] O.J. No. 1223 (Can.)</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Download; Volume (thermodynamics); Law and economics; Political science; Advertising; Economics; Business; Computer science; World Wide Web; Physics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.02510372144971111,"score_gpt":0.2576572364137912,"score_spread":0.23255351496408005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243198121","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009296981,0.00607735,0.00047428234,0.030797528,0.00056499516,0.00015057783,0.0047071646,0.00016842475,0.9477627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.068334505,0.0033789664,0.000560185,0.03132461,0.00016945048,0.00012152712,0.001409777,0.000058172544,0.8946428],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998519,0.00006468699,0.00003739621,0.00009285692,0.0008265757,0.00045949608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884284,0.00021303094,0.000069196256,0.000031379124,0.0006419519,0.00020163516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082004967,0.0005631292,0.00027723156,0.0012879279,0.012843279,0.0049409666,0.0013707712,0.00578378,0.040468436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002766246,0.00083974237,0.00049588067,0.0014946109,0.0017815747,0.0013669775,0.0008916541,0.002409079,0.006217234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037830523,0.00002540759,0.003492844,0.00007537516,0.000008288703,0.00017820393,0.00085875456,0.000071725524,0.00030241124,0.04952132,0.9381756,0.00725231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036169447,0.00001723754,0.018191418,0.00016673001,0.000027683534,0.00009202236,0.00082247594,0.00026518706,0.00045034834,0.00268983,0.97720224,0.000038653787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94488245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9899817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055117548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02403284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035325803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17437124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244012758","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19215","title":"R. v. Miller <i>[2014] B.C.J. No. 2121, 2014 BCSC 1561, Docket: X075613 (British Columbia Supreme Court, April 4, 2014)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Miller; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02322293283140335,"score_gpt":0.2536600518538323,"score_spread":0.23043711902242892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244012758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003321991,0.004075615,0.00061599864,0.05671635,0.0006880237,0.0002298456,0.0042531556,0.00050633494,0.92959255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0328846,0.0023545085,0.00118402,0.080353074,0.00037356353,0.00036946198,0.0012445232,0.00015180855,0.8810844],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976508,0.00017323587,0.00008184597,0.00021881155,0.0011598865,0.0007154316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800044,0.00058293616,0.00010637668,0.000094027615,0.0010021008,0.00021416809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016253979,0.00073787005,0.00055840734,0.002007586,0.011986049,0.005640419,0.0021875885,0.009252793,0.08305398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070273834,0.0009328418,0.0007551353,0.0019152345,0.0020330853,0.0019190129,0.001436458,0.0069183884,0.027160795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020189158,0.000017836624,0.00047567784,0.0000540073,0.000005139584,0.00008816681,0.00016962586,0.000052575462,0.00021937425,0.0485029,0.9426178,0.0077767037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035884645,0.00001894719,0.005962268,0.00036672948,0.000029320216,0.00009517887,0.00034791967,0.00028923395,0.00046838896,0.008846976,0.9834902,0.000048916474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6184404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8486769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3815596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013113913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02973045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76761335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244639184","doi":"10.5195/jlc.2018.158","title":"Front Matter","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Law and Commerce","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Ghana; Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; Grove City College; Temple University; Washington and Lee University; Duquesne University; Santa Clara University; West Virginia University; Stonehill College; University of Akron; Ball State University; Adams State University; Georgetown University; Carnegie Mellon University; University of Louisville; Syracuse University; University of Pittsburgh; University of Dayton; Michigan State University; University of Notre Dame; Yeshiva University; East Tennessee State University; George Washington University; University of Oxford; Florida International University; York University; University of Miami; Northwestern University; University of Pennsylvania; Ohio State University; Yale University; Texas Woman's University; University of South Carolina; Gannon University; San Francisco State University; Carleton College; College of Engineering, Michigan State University; Princeton University; Brown University; Tulane University; Case Western Reserve University; University of Minnesota; Wake Forest University; Boston College; Harvard University","keywords":"Notice; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.024288054281286033,"score_gpt":0.312575618259725,"score_spread":0.28828756397843897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244639184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025819312,0.000632535,0.00039820213,0.0035335561,0.0058870674,0.000099359844,0.0022617604,0.0013993816,0.9855299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00081837707,0.00036736048,0.00019927553,0.0014545978,0.0008101686,0.000031905496,0.0011342607,0.00039421386,0.99478984],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917966,0.00005989325,0.000040106333,0.00022391243,0.00038123492,0.00011511819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978806,0.00022445136,0.00008273342,0.00031315655,0.0009401422,0.0005590386],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007183795,0.0010538042,0.00076173217,0.0016601582,0.0020604804,0.0058954936,0.0014875109,0.0031469003,0.9341804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044302554,0.00040961843,0.00061128347,0.0012015742,0.0005428342,0.0032352498,0.0026368292,0.0020600725,0.92300344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015659201,0.000018058921,0.00010494234,0.000076044955,0.0000015539408,0.000036375764,0.000030753847,0.000009918885,0.00016609524,0.0019020326,0.9439955,0.05364311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033751883,0.0000054528573,0.00013981583,0.000035922203,9.134966e-7,0.000027948156,0.000028565342,0.00001290207,0.00004537031,0.0003225496,0.9993753,0.0000018676678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019673419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002796534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06581962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012245914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019698022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09388363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244833696","doi":"10.29173/alr474","title":"Recent Regulatory and Legislative Developments of Interest to Energy Lawyers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legislation; Energy law; Politics; Political science; Energy (signal processing); Law and economics; Law; Environmental law; Economics; Business","score_opus":0.0563274225112046,"score_gpt":0.3162559533531349,"score_spread":0.2599285308419303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244833696","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010184648,0.6735383,0.0017194644,0.16572239,0.004333068,0.00005825114,0.00020016049,0.00009958854,0.14414418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10416564,0.7254938,0.0044213026,0.099934824,0.011031157,0.000065614564,0.00052558945,0.00009774937,0.054264326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896533,0.0022126879,0.000626097,0.0011406525,0.0051700105,0.0011972046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97047824,0.013665256,0.0030423617,0.0005447194,0.011192875,0.0010764883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013963796,0.0003256795,0.00049190776,0.004457626,0.003379486,0.00852583,0.002090187,0.007227657,0.0077963816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022711808,0.0007639876,0.0005933435,0.0074979486,0.0048937956,0.0043536737,0.0014503276,0.0071126954,0.0011348589],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009877322,0.00026028825,0.0021060167,0.003770767,0.000049761304,0.0006862831,0.0031583565,0.001437994,0.0019481551,0.39944398,0.21740273,0.36963698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010262282,0.00003336936,0.0043224636,0.0008704142,0.00001929746,0.0001942341,0.00076171866,0.00013663131,0.00031535607,0.005974022,0.9873317,0.000030540632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14476593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28137702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8552341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021874554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032515343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28784657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245503644","doi":"10.5840/em2002271223","title":"Canada and Same-Sex Marriage","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Medics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.05662054415782617,"score_gpt":0.3135205864392081,"score_spread":0.2569000422813819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245503644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44994056,0.0237236,0.0007202014,0.16268736,0.00088120584,0.00012993139,0.0021503067,0.000045648932,0.3597212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95614594,0.006107218,0.000261333,0.0066534127,0.000100720674,0.0000250396,0.00020831072,0.000020077909,0.030477917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948996,0.0005829967,0.00012941305,0.000341826,0.0011505248,0.0028956523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98921007,0.002073909,0.00076032965,0.0002236945,0.003548717,0.004183201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023039235,0.00024555952,0.00084851,0.0035164508,0.024169173,0.0068606124,0.0021952896,0.003681556,0.020902213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013519621,0.00035913356,0.0005396424,0.008037521,0.0074053057,0.002145739,0.002821192,0.004898381,0.0004201042],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018888224,0.00016552336,0.0762598,0.00018469499,0.000073962976,0.0009671139,0.021250987,0.00091004866,0.00015399061,0.802925,0.05352243,0.043397576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002465999,0.00010443838,0.3145865,0.0016376799,0.00027419112,0.00091832754,0.13229464,0.0026015148,0.0004947268,0.1292236,0.4173154,0.00030234488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12633602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12633602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22777666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9166363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245946685","doi":"10.2307/3504872","title":"10.2307/3504872","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Perspective (graphical); Philosophy of law; Separate but equal; Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Politics; Mathematics; Civil rights; Comparative law","score_opus":0.008365380806297822,"score_gpt":0.2249569230201606,"score_spread":0.2165915422138628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245946685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026695593,0.00030720813,0.00031507187,0.0003076306,0.0003023046,0.000040666553,0.00077795854,0.0005057476,0.9971764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009984844,0.00032067948,0.00039529658,0.00035963548,0.000080208876,0.000028309081,0.0010308594,0.00028762908,0.99649894],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999453,0.000047163197,0.000040857543,0.00014462222,0.00022658896,0.000087733366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980661,0.0004306366,0.0000758933,0.0003468668,0.00048656116,0.0005939437],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008449415,0.0015517008,0.001110642,0.0023346362,0.0018310028,0.0049236105,0.001808529,0.0028294188,0.98510355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021649122,0.00076796935,0.000689554,0.0027756603,0.0018018511,0.0059914035,0.0040290835,0.0016681285,0.9852976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001511048,0.000143273,0.0004481073,0.0003642135,0.0000122076235,0.00016984018,0.00009606042,0.00013992446,0.0012704507,0.0074467417,0.5999305,0.3898275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002211001,0.0000283571,0.00071277405,0.00016068394,0.0000051741845,0.00017600936,0.00012616138,0.00009660166,0.00017001966,0.001219896,0.9972691,0.000013026668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045621297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005124981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014896452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011674245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014226963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021247983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246137496","doi":"10.18276/aie.2018.42-06","title":"Arguments in the dispute over legalizing euthanasia and physician assisted suicide - part II","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analiza i Egzystencja","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Argument (complex analysis); Immorality; Slippery slope; Autonomy; Premise; Assisted suicide; Value of life; Law; Right to die; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Sociology; Medicine; Political science; Philosophy; Morality; Epistemology; Economics","score_opus":0.09478087885277818,"score_gpt":0.37202013082383756,"score_spread":0.27723925197105936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246137496","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026341083,0.028113035,0.010711793,0.65829676,0.010245335,0.00020203904,0.000068907226,0.00003582327,0.26598528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6571333,0.011822938,0.0066911667,0.2575279,0.013578497,0.00061853963,0.000078898556,0.00009622997,0.052452505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9807685,0.0092133125,0.0010436565,0.001056734,0.0062829475,0.0016348804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.967956,0.027269838,0.001325956,0.0005464985,0.0022267548,0.00067492446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022927566,0.0005134441,0.001127712,0.0021124058,0.007896093,0.011811618,0.0028394728,0.031743787,0.0030842551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04659451,0.0005019643,0.0014277032,0.0015273329,0.030287972,0.008974464,0.0072357296,0.02515666,0.00068734825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015310909,0.000015102598,0.00007136995,0.000065367385,0.0000061274914,0.00022303057,0.0032608134,0.00017845491,0.00013268777,0.9818987,0.011266463,0.00286663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045642642,0.00004947333,0.0005999032,0.0013931409,0.000019663972,0.0003254173,0.005236278,0.00085232547,0.0005090014,0.6432596,0.34764862,0.000060941682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048143766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002159769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031743787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010691256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067940587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12125403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246474693","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvggx1x1.9","title":"“They Are Genetically Incapable” of Defending Québécois Values:","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"MQUP eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology","score_opus":0.02883487945326004,"score_gpt":0.2655839527166406,"score_spread":0.23674907326338054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246474693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07980288,0.0014942562,0.004246919,0.037276175,0.00023604493,0.00006285254,0.00015020564,0.000051327672,0.87667936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72296214,0.0005612579,0.0027474063,0.005910844,0.000038902843,0.000056600766,0.00006525272,0.000050847913,0.2676068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980599,0.000577112,0.000018177649,0.00021940077,0.0004097797,0.0007155489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982615,0.00045420756,0.00012161433,0.0001944033,0.00065739074,0.0003109241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025494169,0.00028425953,0.00024297672,0.0007495822,0.01155754,0.007113887,0.0011971975,0.0029546197,0.014241692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047397213,0.00022096653,0.00021546938,0.00096599467,0.02300664,0.0032053813,0.0017193797,0.0037605262,0.0009035195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013373912,0.000013409238,0.0021628262,0.000011771861,0.000006056971,0.00015446477,0.017387947,0.00012712156,0.0003265622,0.9392292,0.021065503,0.019501714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022052498,0.0000319075,0.018385852,0.00024371543,0.000024265984,0.00023145591,0.028520206,0.00084354426,0.00086867064,0.2522405,0.69850636,0.000081564496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86226135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9513817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13773865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022176871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028144116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2770996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247324961","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_3868","title":"Same-Sex Marriage in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Genealogy; Gender studies; History; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.01637867172896089,"score_gpt":0.23615409189971986,"score_spread":0.21977542017075896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247324961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09354303,0.04282458,0.0011991689,0.041039076,0.0013361081,0.00011576673,0.00088357937,0.00005517176,0.8190036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.578262,0.028542714,0.0010458011,0.0061399615,0.00017355177,0.000054789474,0.00033539918,0.00006211339,0.3853837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980459,0.00016748202,0.000038757542,0.0001451223,0.0005194067,0.0010832408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991949,0.00010773313,0.000029638988,0.000022174689,0.00039658195,0.00024894788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082863367,0.00036489224,0.0005230817,0.0018237656,0.02448181,0.005664883,0.0020592639,0.003016334,0.014533721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022355681,0.00047274967,0.00045481528,0.005158275,0.0055599767,0.0014476231,0.0016478326,0.004281592,0.00069738814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001718394,0.000043100263,0.0030445282,0.00007296774,0.000013262635,0.00036185677,0.012196698,0.00070850615,0.00008216119,0.8441199,0.090537906,0.048801903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000248089,0.000019361789,0.0228034,0.0005687608,0.00003672309,0.0002790384,0.03135676,0.0012511049,0.00023403458,0.048751667,0.8945659,0.000108444656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9981463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99936754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14412421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14412421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27233258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9926946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247898333","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.161113","title":"<i>Moreira v. Ontario Lottery &amp; Gaming Corp.</i> <i>Case No. CV-08-352327, CV-08-356748, [2012] O.J. No. 1879, 2012 ON.C. LEXIS 3717; 2012 ONSC 2304 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, April 30, 2012)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Lexis; Download; Humanities; Art; Mathematics; Computer science; Philosophy; Statistics; World Wide Web; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03858182301488459,"score_gpt":0.2729170242922233,"score_spread":0.23433520127733873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247898333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044537135,0.0035024555,0.00041533608,0.024937237,0.0006013672,0.0002072754,0.0052373125,0.00016239345,0.9604829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.058551624,0.0027628485,0.00081545586,0.047268685,0.0003202038,0.00025309584,0.0024277722,0.00011382581,0.88748646],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974704,0.00012789265,0.00008006403,0.00018430302,0.0013963782,0.0007410353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797744,0.00042030882,0.00013691925,0.0000873578,0.0011303123,0.00024766597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011624559,0.000649458,0.0003732083,0.0016007614,0.011922816,0.0048302785,0.002255026,0.0059531657,0.054230843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00402045,0.0009492981,0.0007467894,0.0019763676,0.00193885,0.0016628935,0.0012406991,0.0032377462,0.009622389],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025173866,0.000016417496,0.0012029456,0.00007161621,0.0000079711335,0.0001483676,0.0006517345,0.000042549687,0.00021790144,0.03342067,0.95903313,0.005161513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022300192,0.0000149220505,0.013246815,0.00014912113,0.000021160467,0.000084634514,0.0006302596,0.00017223027,0.00032894008,0.0021409993,0.98315513,0.00003349696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92143947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98215276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07856053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024962736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030563336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1814202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248841446","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.16611","title":"Between Giuseppe Tarascio and Her Majesty, the Queen[2012] F.C.J. No. 127, 2012 FCA 30, 2012 Fed.C.C. LEXIS 134 (Federal Court of Appeal, Toronto, Ontario; January 26, 2012)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Appeal; Lexis; Art; Humanities; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Botany","score_opus":0.02658409602326493,"score_gpt":0.27696495111278485,"score_spread":0.2503808550895199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248841446","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056226477,0.16505699,0.0016193093,0.5171431,0.017788451,0.00010309922,0.0005045281,0.00017699407,0.29198492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08650934,0.031195428,0.0011195956,0.21281551,0.00780667,0.00016393651,0.00016434022,0.00022315381,0.6600021],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990338,0.00027779053,0.000025121222,0.00025735295,0.0002178281,0.00018815798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987348,0.0008031531,0.00007810785,0.00004766198,0.00014128178,0.00019495358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013298463,0.00072833395,0.0004398624,0.00075784087,0.0075063235,0.0041389847,0.00091573066,0.005299549,0.02587189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044726883,0.000528847,0.00030113154,0.00068612763,0.002909019,0.0026424974,0.0023630003,0.007129025,0.0075718467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021320313,0.000009671178,0.00024733823,0.00006185101,0.0000068555837,0.00017706092,0.0012140819,0.00003812144,0.000087183325,0.039486676,0.94987273,0.008777097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009643799,0.000006841641,0.0013536118,0.00016075498,0.000005150152,0.00015207673,0.0008824293,0.000059304548,0.00007313942,0.005102367,0.99217904,0.000015665108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.076929666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22180662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9230703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033053649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031043917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15296376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249162492","doi":"10.1089/glr.2007.11611","title":"Treyes v. Ontario Lottery &amp; Gaming Corp., No. 05-CV-290238PD1 [2007] (O.S.C.J. July 11, 2007)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Download; Advertising; Volume (thermodynamics); Art; Business; Political science; Humanities; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Physics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.04161001636919018,"score_gpt":0.32459618465748963,"score_spread":0.2829861682882995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249162492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008494363,0.0032229223,0.0005138181,0.012223394,0.0002703848,0.00015384803,0.0028126973,0.00016708681,0.9721415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.052421045,0.0019546456,0.0004505574,0.011005735,0.000077909644,0.00009013593,0.0009227718,0.00005497554,0.93302226],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828196,0.000058693342,0.000029526887,0.000091766095,0.0010828441,0.0004552946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856913,0.00019230746,0.000059740487,0.000034121425,0.00094422005,0.00020039575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092819036,0.00049030065,0.00031512429,0.0012364449,0.011946066,0.0038779892,0.0013887698,0.0042248117,0.06520002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028497784,0.0007112727,0.0004958792,0.0012568329,0.0016319636,0.0011374142,0.0008702786,0.002417442,0.010650435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006838137,0.000033880948,0.004434252,0.00010822017,0.000012797509,0.00030616025,0.0010844386,0.00010045115,0.000683818,0.049847886,0.927605,0.015714837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005185061,0.000031348372,0.02576963,0.00017703802,0.000035434387,0.0001414595,0.00092919107,0.00032783535,0.000707804,0.002532087,0.9692497,0.000046539175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95269847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06520002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020897392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028956605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2181158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249754693","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20115","title":"Kalra v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corp. <i>[2015] O.J. No. 4153, 2015 ONSC 4983; Court File No.: CV-14-4450-00 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, August 6, 2015)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Economic Justice; Download; Law; Political science; Federal court; Library science; Computer science; Supreme court; Economics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.019604268381198654,"score_gpt":0.2578478612331971,"score_spread":0.23824359285199842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249754693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008905198,0.003970978,0.00069639314,0.020513518,0.00037318293,0.00024005487,0.0052200276,0.00017382429,0.959907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11083378,0.003342281,0.00097581354,0.021202803,0.00017178233,0.00021657888,0.0019543695,0.00007482703,0.86122775],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765354,0.00012458685,0.00006909013,0.00013519505,0.0013220535,0.0006956163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99748504,0.00043830043,0.0001306147,0.00006845088,0.0015319124,0.00034570575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013156559,0.00042254792,0.00029646882,0.0014244729,0.012910357,0.0044124965,0.0014487912,0.0034640573,0.05494036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041525727,0.0007298295,0.0005303083,0.0014693786,0.0017659737,0.0015268604,0.001040845,0.0021493114,0.007510233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056048593,0.000024288547,0.0033018487,0.00015079224,0.0000107955475,0.00020579332,0.0011786327,0.00008418039,0.0003877111,0.07356338,0.90999115,0.011045372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053603017,0.000028377539,0.029540468,0.00027207503,0.000044044136,0.00013445115,0.001187761,0.00040988927,0.0005202207,0.0038292536,0.96392465,0.000055153076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9602725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99254346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05494036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030807775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04582311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22352713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250988032","doi":"10.1089/glre.2011.15308","title":"Between Clotilde Bérubé, Appellant, and Rational Entertainment Limited, RespondentINDEXED AS: Bérubé v. Rational Entertainment Ltd.Divisional Court File No. 09-DV-1559Ontario Superior Court of JusticeDivisional Court - Ottawa, Ontario","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entertainment; Law; Federal court; Political science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.027157987084553525,"score_gpt":0.2608420082777049,"score_spread":0.23368402119315135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250988032","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055564508,0.008107948,0.0005842237,0.05801092,0.0009427615,0.00018250462,0.002412527,0.00002780042,0.8741667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3145534,0.0020610357,0.0002880988,0.021998309,0.0002302736,0.00014201649,0.0005111387,0.000030049223,0.66018564],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743384,0.00027045602,0.000089113644,0.00046786887,0.0006279775,0.0011109167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707234,0.0010178955,0.00016325516,0.00009909086,0.0009967114,0.0006506227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016359643,0.0003160061,0.00034633366,0.00096524257,0.014889469,0.004789334,0.0011349887,0.005559655,0.043453623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008271437,0.0005510133,0.0002850183,0.0011589874,0.0019762113,0.0018447741,0.0017292843,0.004723325,0.0033130478],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024674818,0.00008577264,0.019752529,0.00013773676,0.000034274733,0.0013157211,0.0075653717,0.00013179383,0.00041106093,0.25348157,0.693995,0.022842411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076884135,0.00003789919,0.05302111,0.00029969448,0.00004002536,0.0003808506,0.008052599,0.00031903287,0.00041316487,0.0073761838,0.92993283,0.000049690618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7735399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9363074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2264601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015814561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020386435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4555875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251263544","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14913","title":"Chippewas of Mnjikaning First Nation v. Ontario (Native Affairs), <i>S.C.C.A. No. 91, C.S.C.R. no 91, File No.: 33613 (Supreme Court of Canada, July 8, 2010)</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.016435658769321584,"score_gpt":0.2192227205486977,"score_spread":0.2027870617793761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251263544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024629964,0.005338595,0.0008334339,0.06218552,0.0012313343,0.00019634789,0.0036149207,0.00010404842,0.9018659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17187269,0.0042444123,0.0009633677,0.03994244,0.00021723856,0.0001234273,0.0012334016,0.000054502187,0.7813485],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986688,0.00008486785,0.000030055096,0.00011641196,0.0006115003,0.000488506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986589,0.00037790535,0.000045944056,0.000041955278,0.00068393117,0.0001913427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011030744,0.00036645553,0.0003133382,0.0008992121,0.013888802,0.0049269386,0.0011982427,0.005024548,0.018785235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004417596,0.0004303952,0.0003800209,0.0010014757,0.0017650006,0.0012367235,0.0008270355,0.0029592644,0.002070016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006645438,0.00003771478,0.0063941474,0.00015049185,0.000018897166,0.0008871601,0.0037252724,0.00010819805,0.00084215926,0.13138245,0.84384406,0.012543027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021896627,0.000026039193,0.023704028,0.00018415533,0.000051003564,0.00018843256,0.0037416066,0.0003307391,0.0013728864,0.005215028,0.9651108,0.000053289878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9208972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98508334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079102814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020538146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039534543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15913731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251984746","doi":"10.1353/hyp.2006.0066","title":"The Long Arc of Justice: Lesbian and Gay Marriage, Equality, and Rights (review)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hypatia","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Taboo; Economic Justice; Wonder; Gay rights; Sociology; Law; Mainstream; Gender studies; Politics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03715062602520627,"score_gpt":0.35797233449054605,"score_spread":0.3208217084653398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251984746","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000021676005,0.99656785,0.000021118141,0.0010982571,0.0012400072,0.000011907787,0.000023707582,0.000005652108,0.0010098087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00032237772,0.9939281,0.00004720988,0.002311926,0.0011932055,0.000027966767,0.00005994635,0.0000030841657,0.0021062866],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992901,0.00014108974,0.000083247956,0.000081344966,0.00034581847,0.00005836521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982773,0.00062857446,0.00032058364,0.000029344703,0.0005895126,0.00015465853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008803248,0.0009987482,0.0018122138,0.002608656,0.0005970946,0.00290608,0.0010163583,0.001689602,0.01835892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037761168,0.0005025745,0.00078331225,0.0045232866,0.0007875203,0.0023609633,0.0010846443,0.0035308176,0.0052914815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059770708,0.000036235415,0.00016757866,0.03231553,0.0000915893,0.00008240927,0.000104314066,0.00008776304,0.00012920683,0.0012254883,0.6240556,0.3416446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003425167,0.000063085514,0.0015476086,0.032027237,0.00015762304,0.0005652294,0.00014111154,0.000031667554,0.000036901547,0.0005804869,0.9647949,0.00001993022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061886217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011043575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01835892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015580864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051039453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061416686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252216832","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.17415","title":"Majewski v. Complex Services Inc. <i>[2013] O.J. No. 396; 2013 ON.C. LEXIS 282; 2013 ONSC 690 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, January 30, 2013)</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Download; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Humanities; Art; Philosophy; Computer science; World Wide Web; Linguistics","score_opus":0.024848904152509753,"score_gpt":0.26179457320145105,"score_spread":0.2369456690489413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252216832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008172361,0.0036546604,0.00078643515,0.03880506,0.00053786725,0.0001850231,0.0030653635,0.00017234588,0.94462097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.100131,0.0029829773,0.0012943672,0.06324959,0.0002829429,0.00031271664,0.0013766102,0.00011716008,0.8302526],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986628,0.00010214389,0.00006917217,0.00013456299,0.0006666433,0.00036463395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989838,0.00034397715,0.00008770949,0.000036449535,0.00039762657,0.00015030397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010281305,0.0005220845,0.0002562064,0.0012458629,0.008721083,0.00472937,0.0012318264,0.0044681616,0.043879073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043488685,0.00080546434,0.0005497812,0.0010209841,0.0014484208,0.0018854807,0.0013039707,0.003783372,0.008717456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051419895,0.000021854976,0.001471971,0.00011098428,0.000008130565,0.00018176605,0.00073175126,0.00007187448,0.00042507797,0.1714076,0.81550485,0.010012805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041664618,0.000022093625,0.008432626,0.00026920423,0.000028029688,0.00016362761,0.0005613508,0.00041607342,0.00060555304,0.008407572,0.981012,0.000040298248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52939326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83069277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47060674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009742303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01726714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9467565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252492574","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3945019","title":"Nova Scotia (Attorney General) v. Lawen Estate: Case Comment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Estate; Law; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01796054517169222,"score_gpt":0.30338343647345184,"score_spread":0.28542289130175963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252492574","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05922841,0.0028653436,0.0009369764,0.6480225,0.0074560214,0.00026815027,0.0013651036,0.0001456766,0.27971184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18343827,0.0018726484,0.00069033273,0.6241061,0.0020386425,0.000177697,0.000307177,0.00007428842,0.18729477],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99530905,0.000478914,0.00027458437,0.0007567056,0.0013393313,0.001841463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99009985,0.0058692438,0.00049471186,0.00039061403,0.0019880272,0.0011575863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039609587,0.00073291844,0.0008011311,0.001171313,0.01677531,0.0070292046,0.0039399574,0.04438119,0.016210543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017203996,0.0010652066,0.001013222,0.0017532911,0.0038692604,0.0025173596,0.0028358218,0.01752345,0.0039059436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023047705,0.00011719606,0.011681134,0.00019610912,0.00004428342,0.007291534,0.006948288,0.00024314478,0.0012134885,0.0695504,0.89698625,0.0054977587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023689702,0.00011757399,0.02959951,0.00081816694,0.0002548497,0.003025231,0.013163406,0.0008610026,0.0022460115,0.011763461,0.9376339,0.00028002288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6386862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84094435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36131382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01512111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026192835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7268833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253009070","doi":"10.15353/cgjsc-rcessc.v3i1.81","title":"A Class Action on Behalf of Federally-Sentenced Women with Mental Health Issues","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Graduate Journal of Sociology and Criminology","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Mental health; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Psychology; Criminology; Political science; Medicine; Psychiatry; Computer science; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.10617544029194828,"score_gpt":0.34159168368573145,"score_spread":0.23541624339378317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253009070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.552017,0.0013137696,0.003281433,0.1692377,0.0015680637,0.00034773193,0.00007233352,0.00007568742,0.2720862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91832435,0.00026248887,0.00070744567,0.020040369,0.00018498489,0.00007253508,0.000011843396,0.000016098618,0.06037993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948548,0.0010285969,0.00011514681,0.0005266408,0.00072465924,0.0027500992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947635,0.0021657178,0.00059727876,0.00034443685,0.0007389274,0.0013900663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004049141,0.000320138,0.00034184018,0.00055605173,0.0331383,0.00525653,0.0017869183,0.0073648035,0.0075272024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012674397,0.0002842021,0.000546891,0.00030822933,0.009916488,0.0019304703,0.005154503,0.007786937,0.0006067161],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009636014,0.0003039934,0.023785869,0.00011975642,0.00004828156,0.006833156,0.2573656,0.00032554596,0.005448062,0.5598512,0.07888956,0.06693262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061975574,0.00045578886,0.037420798,0.0004905548,0.00014832328,0.002320191,0.26831096,0.0015414072,0.008147678,0.043712564,0.6372259,0.00016379403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2749561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43136036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7250439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009187702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023303892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5467113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253588455","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20311","title":"Lalani v. Reeves <i>Case File No. 07-CV-338183CP; [2016] O.J. No. 397; 2016 ONSC 424 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, January 26, 2016)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Download; Law; Political science; Art; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.01707181484242867,"score_gpt":0.25230569093579847,"score_spread":0.2352338760933698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253588455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027986865,0.0017428899,0.00045546805,0.023556191,0.00040627437,0.00018099307,0.005248215,0.00023565683,0.9653757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06614634,0.002910529,0.001155042,0.07690497,0.0005255514,0.00046597343,0.0038617256,0.00026218628,0.8477676],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959622,0.00037870996,0.00014971478,0.00037524142,0.0018520015,0.0012821249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954514,0.0018225241,0.00023102835,0.00020174513,0.0019024246,0.00039086497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033134113,0.00064334465,0.00060977146,0.0023687175,0.009774059,0.0067248014,0.0030996762,0.008750908,0.094121344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010748159,0.0008828234,0.0008381975,0.0021877706,0.0018279266,0.0021512266,0.0016786715,0.005336689,0.027102817],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000359032,0.000022386588,0.0011026165,0.00007516614,0.000009293467,0.00017045841,0.000497609,0.000039646584,0.00016580238,0.06862741,0.92475706,0.004496713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003795349,0.000020549565,0.005955491,0.0002875861,0.000029231736,0.00014641663,0.000534743,0.00021704825,0.00046866148,0.005265468,0.9869986,0.000038260252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66179985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83778083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33820015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013838078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020255553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68038374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253663200","doi":"10.5040/9781509922529","title":"Courts Without Cases","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.04520050111094261,"score_gpt":0.2962721350163189,"score_spread":0.2510716339053763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253663200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005358545,0.0042332406,0.0009718258,0.009666048,0.0015299175,0.0000415201,0.0001474415,0.00010295648,0.9827711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03112077,0.0044547687,0.001271965,0.011260666,0.001148521,0.00007250068,0.00029300008,0.00012479097,0.95025295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99190795,0.0009350644,0.00022090416,0.000943358,0.004384956,0.0016077614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959629,0.0010876374,0.00015776396,0.00078324194,0.001540782,0.0004677451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027103042,0.0008319661,0.0007595656,0.002169539,0.012813721,0.01591524,0.0027019535,0.006314774,0.06822873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01110671,0.00063018996,0.0007380339,0.0028691238,0.013762675,0.0073683155,0.0060166623,0.007918622,0.018904895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024343647,0.000004410193,0.00003405345,0.00002118413,9.986697e-7,0.000061872066,0.0004267339,0.000042448202,0.00004146374,0.88265216,0.10676837,0.009943895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028541233,0.0000026688638,0.000069315065,0.00007341826,0.000002044508,0.00003804852,0.0002025205,0.00004704557,0.00003563042,0.03205081,0.96747106,0.000004594987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27806008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36425242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27806008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022080833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04124093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55288315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253904827","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.161114","title":"<i>Moreira v. Ontario Lottery &amp; Gaming Corp.</i> <i>Case No. CV-08-352327, CV-08-356748, [2012] O.J. No. 2359, 2012 ON.C. Lexis 4239; 2012 ONSC 2903 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, May 29, 2012)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Lexis; Download; Humanities; Political science; Art; Mathematics; Computer science; Philosophy; Statistics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.04049825371803708,"score_gpt":0.2792281938176612,"score_spread":0.2387299400996241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253904827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004389915,0.0034715794,0.0004302562,0.023899885,0.00058341824,0.00020964435,0.005253381,0.00016069852,0.9616012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05884213,0.0028372079,0.00085270026,0.045513414,0.00031513962,0.0002546432,0.0024662244,0.00011228525,0.8888063],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974673,0.00012806046,0.000081527905,0.00018516959,0.0014129799,0.0007249212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980013,0.0004135294,0.00013413648,0.0000862145,0.0011250466,0.00023995363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001159629,0.0006490014,0.00036968407,0.0016002175,0.0117629,0.0047397665,0.0022407454,0.005745423,0.054450396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039478396,0.0009322229,0.0007455525,0.0019842668,0.0019119933,0.0016378266,0.0012268831,0.003138071,0.009573888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025824116,0.000016762331,0.0012324074,0.00007415987,0.000008087387,0.00015266534,0.0006626921,0.00004454558,0.00022961579,0.034580052,0.95754826,0.005424802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002244423,0.000014925494,0.013265398,0.00015178483,0.000021437727,0.0000865258,0.0006258116,0.0001790483,0.00033511323,0.0022177862,0.98304635,0.000033421846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9224749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98243594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07752508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025145939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031034652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18244743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254099115","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.17611","title":"Lake Louise Limited Partnership v. Canad Corp. of Manitoba, Ltd.Case No. CI 09-01-61504 and CI 09-01-61489, [2013] M.J. No. 81; 2013 MBQB 67; 2013 MB.C.Lexis 81 (Manitoba Court of Queen s Bench, Winnipeg Centre, March 15, 2013)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); General partnership; Charter; Library science; Political science; Geography; Humanities; Art; Archaeology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.02751448436436627,"score_gpt":0.2525301976058204,"score_spread":0.22501571324145414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254099115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024177646,0.007923131,0.0011553693,0.06300332,0.0008050569,0.00034518653,0.004099237,0.0002629089,0.8982281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09288446,0.0028551174,0.00084290776,0.038571462,0.00008970357,0.0002143369,0.0008221091,0.000052895888,0.8636671],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984433,0.00014070184,0.000037039586,0.0001490283,0.0006656468,0.00056430843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980775,0.00037145684,0.00009980944,0.000051779025,0.001093594,0.00030587538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014611607,0.0006668971,0.00025403406,0.0016060637,0.014505815,0.005484297,0.0016839129,0.0046909857,0.036119692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036353185,0.0011232381,0.00042249862,0.0020602087,0.0020082635,0.0019154797,0.001286972,0.0035992963,0.005849797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009788759,0.000074340795,0.009209489,0.00020757792,0.000031998043,0.00077200576,0.0021179188,0.00022189111,0.000999649,0.12508838,0.8420689,0.019110069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083566716,0.000060423437,0.022919385,0.00040219352,0.000074038966,0.0002573275,0.003636572,0.0006178691,0.0013593199,0.004976443,0.96552706,0.00008589998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9266575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98678374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0733425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02474609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06036525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1795463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255176700","doi":"10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim080210021","title":"The Story of an Illusion: The Plan to Trade the 'Alabama' Claims for Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"The SHAFR Guide Online","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Illusion; Plan (archaeology); History; Archaeology; Psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.03726105557574012,"score_gpt":0.36292009114538787,"score_spread":0.32565903556964776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255176700","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031768356,0.00046501608,0.00013121348,0.0031774128,0.00016070709,0.00001655619,0.98498154,0.00025898387,0.007631869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012296433,0.00046279698,0.0005113619,0.00052972266,0.00005752144,0.00006931519,0.97795606,0.00012904342,0.007987707],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990158,0.00013354543,0.0000588125,0.00011080094,0.00041817114,0.00026291478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953874,0.0012560214,0.00032544864,0.0005909345,0.0019457971,0.00049441046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012842629,0.00083261647,0.0005738548,0.0038945375,0.002744586,0.0044631776,0.0020137785,0.0022897108,0.02941672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010569591,0.00040844825,0.0006366549,0.006521424,0.0009672371,0.0021195323,0.0022419475,0.0030322196,0.014124525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020728257,0.000008320766,0.002138496,0.000078450335,0.0000067379956,0.00002501171,0.00008120365,0.0001641088,0.000013674892,0.0017345259,0.993885,0.0018438391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008283192,0.0000054299994,0.012945341,0.00036341627,0.000017287237,0.00006549427,0.0013756182,0.0013116999,0.0002178388,0.0034347533,0.9801514,0.000028953162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73850185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90101486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26149815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008782579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014756678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5260763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256483765","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.171012","title":"Marina District Development Co. (c.o.b. Borgata Hotel Casino &amp; Spa) v. Canada <i>Case No. [2013] F.C.J. No. 847; 2103 Fed.C.C. LEXIS 858; 2013 F.C. 800; (Federal Court, Toronto, Ontario, July 18, 2013)</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Download; Advertising; Business; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.02357041584856334,"score_gpt":0.252725631977032,"score_spread":0.22915521612846868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256483765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004190296,0.00326408,0.0004666645,0.01215089,0.00043695318,0.00010763418,0.0022580153,0.00016003147,0.9769654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040263366,0.0021630093,0.00062844204,0.007818507,0.00008367935,0.000083703606,0.0008562401,0.000065331515,0.9480378],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991122,0.000049249844,0.000021275971,0.000105521416,0.0004502352,0.00026146809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909735,0.0001447639,0.000046419103,0.00003095038,0.0005608627,0.000119641176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058271695,0.0004228766,0.00022537401,0.0013054749,0.008703095,0.003958743,0.0010559955,0.0022754245,0.07315166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017052103,0.0005997787,0.00034684318,0.0012652273,0.0009607335,0.0010113809,0.00086298963,0.002212423,0.013016852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022599002,0.000029843432,0.001732411,0.00007621143,0.0000062663908,0.00013318422,0.00028399468,0.00006565045,0.00031466212,0.058595058,0.9245159,0.0142242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014682819,0.000012477437,0.005972923,0.000098544995,0.000011383144,0.00006804284,0.00041112627,0.00019123752,0.00039445545,0.0017106639,0.99109757,0.000016892955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.793688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9467469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.206312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010753764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018799191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41505402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256694958","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.181010","title":"Szecsodi v. MGM Resorts International <i>Court File No. CV-11-9457-00CL, [2014) O.J. No. 946, 2014 ONSC 1323, 2014 CarswellOnt 2465 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Commercial List, March 3, 2014)</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Download; Law; Political science; Library science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.01533223290551432,"score_gpt":0.26300772418413465,"score_spread":0.24767549127862032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256694958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016071752,0.0044316263,0.0007589967,0.030198192,0.0007388481,0.0000906743,0.003889969,0.00016725468,0.9436527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25346634,0.0039943415,0.00097128574,0.03386708,0.00038277337,0.00015584212,0.0027005824,0.00013315932,0.7043286],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855584,0.000085998334,0.00006064927,0.00011129584,0.00051625504,0.0006699713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994861,0.00014857484,0.000045199344,0.000030644016,0.00020637314,0.000083167615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011316269,0.0004184118,0.00038176146,0.0014420315,0.004711817,0.0048756488,0.0010062174,0.0042009354,0.07018003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027382022,0.00036622194,0.0005124633,0.0012625596,0.001424275,0.001618421,0.0016740622,0.0028734228,0.009929342],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014876302,0.00003331225,0.0017342984,0.00016302546,0.000017114608,0.00072632835,0.00072599907,0.00014082532,0.0004894429,0.33143607,0.6478778,0.016507061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007675487,0.000032184278,0.011025544,0.0002531038,0.000040225015,0.00039756627,0.00095440797,0.00045806402,0.0012160069,0.02192602,0.9635816,0.00003838129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14131856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26644832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14131856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055584977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076438445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28099197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281944215","doi":"10.21991/cf29440","title":"Special Issue on Dickson v. Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation, 2021 YKCA 5","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.023339500237354822,"score_gpt":0.2675515541482636,"score_spread":0.24421205391090878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281944215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015133742,0.008220505,0.0004028958,0.14066945,0.062209874,0.0003530795,0.0062927473,0.00036297,0.7799752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0061681257,0.0023763159,0.00027983173,0.09403607,0.012689201,0.00029229117,0.0014597396,0.00013924185,0.88255924],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998451,0.00019635844,0.00006733016,0.00022626403,0.00068014866,0.00037894226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997689,0.0010051528,0.00010184507,0.00011008645,0.00078979175,0.000304095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019280033,0.0008679864,0.0009082962,0.0014824746,0.005258976,0.0061669922,0.001765124,0.017457372,0.15175535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061722146,0.00051702524,0.00082065165,0.00089287973,0.0010688824,0.0023784519,0.0018526333,0.007932063,0.05567423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010659917,0.000011557689,0.00004912685,0.000019908039,0.0000012776204,0.000038026603,0.000019755296,0.0000113219885,0.00006552993,0.0033803184,0.9948251,0.0015674124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014090876,0.000008751102,0.000694008,0.00011241906,0.0000050157873,0.000024579307,0.00005193391,0.000038740247,0.00006703258,0.0014992539,0.99747497,0.000009281766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06038975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15878521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93961024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004866094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012482609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5076722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289942971","doi":"10.1177/14647001221114611","title":"Drafting injustice: overturning <i>Roe v. Wade</i> , spillover effects and reproductive rights in context","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Theory","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Injustice; Context (archaeology); Reproductive rights; Spillover effect; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Philosophy; History; Demography; Reproductive health","score_opus":0.007330329053927768,"score_gpt":0.26507397967954793,"score_spread":0.25774365062562016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289942971","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27099526,0.005120395,0.008548125,0.16078426,0.00067206717,0.00019342128,0.000085599255,0.00004743913,0.5535534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96550584,0.0009501752,0.0009643398,0.017734507,0.000148194,0.000070811104,0.000011914031,0.0000193812,0.014594823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.987795,0.0069847694,0.00044880732,0.0015359343,0.001230545,0.0020050057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97647846,0.017285291,0.0024665962,0.0018047802,0.0013115795,0.00065332185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016521784,0.00035185096,0.0004103837,0.0011923669,0.009327917,0.011170355,0.0022104017,0.014431627,0.004734214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0367132,0.00036511058,0.00048202934,0.00077048887,0.031870358,0.008111792,0.008006406,0.012719175,0.00034780524],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002523031,0.000052810738,0.0017757304,0.0000694337,0.000012640295,0.00032659885,0.022706784,0.00019926175,0.0003386939,0.9613375,0.005884335,0.007270981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012795684,0.00022938171,0.018317819,0.0018760777,0.00021736757,0.0007599343,0.07983941,0.0014938357,0.0051647816,0.67363614,0.21811153,0.00022587544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03939349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08171217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03939349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006006527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0107815815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087376595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297261397","doi":"10.1097/01.npr.0000873552.13618.91","title":"The overturn of Roe v. Wade","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Nurse Practitioner","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Management; Economic history; Political science; Law and economics; Law; History; Sociology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.015824041127521955,"score_gpt":0.30500866873611515,"score_spread":0.2891846276085932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297261397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06652716,0.0050111376,0.0011782027,0.39673662,0.004886486,0.000047433816,0.000061252285,0.00006629732,0.5254854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6271653,0.0014175861,0.00039915013,0.20990753,0.0008200764,0.00004735107,0.000026802567,0.000075586664,0.16014062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928186,0.002479685,0.00027351335,0.0008631182,0.0013448669,0.0022202265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99281055,0.0036446871,0.00042149556,0.00081054895,0.0012979653,0.0010148126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076485844,0.0002274405,0.0004726003,0.0006266461,0.013495965,0.006063902,0.0012266238,0.011404209,0.0062284954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032279357,0.00042595077,0.00036307468,0.0004174427,0.008549669,0.003798748,0.004391692,0.020378865,0.0012127443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069069065,0.00006725856,0.004150425,0.000046350175,0.000024864341,0.0029588137,0.022659915,0.00020586792,0.0005677759,0.66617525,0.26448712,0.038587354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002539388,0.000055715616,0.0040229685,0.00037620618,0.000022473587,0.0011537727,0.014562329,0.00024746716,0.00070238166,0.048338197,0.9304248,0.000068211164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.064716175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20337151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064716175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054292656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012239361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12867892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298088210","doi":"","title":"Did hosp. violate FMLA: is RN guilty of job abandonment? Case on point: Stekloff v. St. John's Mercy Health Systems, 2000 WL 959613 F.3d-MO (2000).","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abandonment (legal); Point (geometry); Law; Political science; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.02319196584991082,"score_gpt":0.2708065344722051,"score_spread":0.24761456862229428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298088210","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053473085,0.0029245142,0.00082025194,0.66044605,0.0021622386,0.00009453542,0.0013630834,0.00012536038,0.27859095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39001465,0.0019686471,0.00064846355,0.4609868,0.0016726375,0.00012790771,0.00047644443,0.000057952075,0.14404644],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799156,0.00040261575,0.000117848984,0.00015887198,0.0004911672,0.0008378614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99532217,0.0018365957,0.00045964468,0.00013261527,0.0009530796,0.0012958433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034962143,0.0003294538,0.00025357478,0.00047636215,0.008997368,0.002809405,0.0015274617,0.014719428,0.019142555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01470032,0.00048484447,0.0004345698,0.0003347222,0.0024936965,0.0015917986,0.002072624,0.008267742,0.0037146115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014975191,0.00012243383,0.024730835,0.00011614431,0.0000354848,0.004969284,0.0066365474,0.00017148574,0.000743709,0.0587472,0.8848554,0.018721713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024527215,0.0004332117,0.075077556,0.001628272,0.00018878444,0.00392162,0.02501018,0.0014404919,0.0027407962,0.022550972,0.8665253,0.00023761805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.114664614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34261692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.114664614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059007835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007923217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22799438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298394964","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197519998.013.10","title":"When Queer Theory Goes to Law School","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Queer theory; Sodomy; Human sexuality; Interrogation; Sociology; Gender studies; Feminism; Supreme court; Homosexuality; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.023680275708311257,"score_gpt":0.23315658350301555,"score_spread":0.20947630779470428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298394964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060875,0.018745048,0.008861628,0.2475391,0.0020856857,0.000031633015,0.00007624702,0.00007851873,0.7164946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6705648,0.018763272,0.0044082603,0.06806585,0.0043798615,0.00017352731,0.00016884605,0.00024901255,0.23322654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99586946,0.0021678929,0.00007508589,0.0004894593,0.0008555584,0.0005425982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99422246,0.0041777957,0.00022056985,0.0004596492,0.00055029884,0.00036916454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00674315,0.00035190495,0.0005213887,0.0014002676,0.008285696,0.013088735,0.0013696834,0.006363103,0.015157683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010459502,0.0002517668,0.0003617602,0.0012332381,0.051950395,0.017067295,0.003252377,0.01193237,0.0021386335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.1759897e-7,0.0000020971797,0.00001556885,0.0000046175787,3.5711105e-7,0.000011631209,0.00090880616,0.000015062013,0.000004971602,0.993786,0.004211471,0.0010388459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041598933,0.0000043357804,0.00010446362,0.0001383203,0.0000017464092,0.00003258072,0.0024093622,0.000121178186,0.000055197343,0.7994373,0.19768643,0.0000049983837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019860031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014145974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019860031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009104036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006882324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06605464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4303107322","doi":"10.46692/9781447313656.007","title":"Access to records and family reunification","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family reunification; Computer science; Genealogy; Geography; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.07185045756388912,"score_gpt":0.371956698856067,"score_spread":0.3001062412921779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4303107322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08642061,0.020483498,0.0041352105,0.18074985,0.0020377634,0.000104823324,0.0005305486,0.00016302239,0.70537466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84309244,0.013656929,0.0013898101,0.014238321,0.0007100588,0.000099914316,0.0003824027,0.00012798129,0.12630218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865421,0.0073311194,0.0007957081,0.0011772129,0.0020310604,0.0021228283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9717882,0.01320103,0.003621409,0.004900079,0.0028927815,0.003596511],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009486753,0.00018332253,0.0003440362,0.0022106785,0.0134779345,0.012709149,0.0023534568,0.0037683323,0.031603143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035224974,0.0003956642,0.00028259715,0.0034142307,0.019209335,0.020082183,0.01642512,0.0051305518,0.0034994257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003365117,0.000036181165,0.0039936914,0.00017023434,0.000012757194,0.0018719047,0.3356716,0.000062476465,0.00014149566,0.50928926,0.06749988,0.08121684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074187283,0.000021219072,0.0030779818,0.0013651104,0.0000063495027,0.0013181613,0.2060364,0.000036558245,0.0001122033,0.03216038,0.7558211,0.000037126094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033387356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024628535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033387356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006363296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010529444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10572302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306366317","doi":"","title":"Implications and reflections on the 2010 Supreme Court ruling on Canada&amp;amp;#39;s AHR Act","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.10491841339325327,"score_gpt":0.3292463078774602,"score_spread":0.22432789448420692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306366317","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014207181,0.0020816473,0.00018474173,0.95024294,0.0031917875,0.00002888108,0.00012286248,0.000009979977,0.029929973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2892651,0.0036731788,0.00058886595,0.67489594,0.0036588307,0.00007066382,0.0001021039,0.00006727918,0.027678119],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96205324,0.009155603,0.0012535069,0.0032011007,0.012214452,0.012122023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9323012,0.04395778,0.0026652755,0.0009550432,0.0138911065,0.006229496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039325245,0.0006593594,0.0010668747,0.0024406128,0.04290185,0.02685476,0.0072714193,0.048826143,0.0070947893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08283755,0.0010503973,0.0012941561,0.004858365,0.040615257,0.005796552,0.006481796,0.054218493,0.0008842217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010934737,0.000065199405,0.002094382,0.00011178301,0.000037301907,0.0017786677,0.033357043,0.00071918766,0.0005412636,0.4118966,0.5396296,0.009659624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015525393,0.000057394405,0.010471374,0.0016396488,0.00012750336,0.00034421144,0.08652938,0.0011954476,0.0011714215,0.08163433,0.81613517,0.000538756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.906532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92999893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14126392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14126392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19824669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99601215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308792409","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada Ruling in Carter v. Canada: A New Era of End-of-Life Care for Canadians","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.18168632627563136,"score_gpt":0.48128892694769154,"score_spread":0.2996026006720602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308792409","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055533674,0.006416725,0.0012511988,0.70011324,0.0033569732,0.00013945764,0.0015106378,0.00008973698,0.23158833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5179623,0.004048782,0.002594732,0.3490251,0.0011745885,0.000099970544,0.0004013799,0.00014395251,0.12454925],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910129,0.00068614254,0.0002169452,0.00077834417,0.0035901652,0.0037154863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886314,0.002217174,0.00031138893,0.00021010797,0.005671869,0.0029580959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051218653,0.00041217505,0.0007070636,0.0011997935,0.032381415,0.010609104,0.0032350651,0.01531432,0.0066323546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019658735,0.0006982956,0.00087829767,0.0022195491,0.006853913,0.002139406,0.0027051137,0.018757857,0.0004842043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008765732,0.000027832995,0.005249105,0.00010692661,0.000046559428,0.00097379746,0.0069877915,0.00055880373,0.0006259862,0.4198261,0.5508554,0.014654005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013485417,0.00003560252,0.016124854,0.00076773285,0.00021686095,0.0002902288,0.011176601,0.0015048498,0.0011806632,0.03758763,0.9306311,0.00034891756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9949685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99795747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13585804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13585804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33043137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98572373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311883767","doi":"","title":"No Jordan’s Principle Cases in Canada? A Review of the Administrative Response to Jordan’s Principle","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.41825039322154733,"score_gpt":0.6133055297225486,"score_spread":0.19505513650100126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311883767","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006861831,0.9913351,0.000039411,0.003297546,0.00021740372,0.00001405304,0.00003557975,0.0000032433459,0.0043714647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01140339,0.98566705,0.00016908222,0.0019505265,0.00014103025,0.000014037401,0.00003941203,0.0000035205294,0.0006120512],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956554,0.0008221731,0.0003620908,0.00031835178,0.0024787434,0.00036319802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98997927,0.0037402166,0.000994286,0.00014864777,0.004658148,0.0004794248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007232055,0.0005864568,0.0011915631,0.0062367795,0.0035417038,0.004800991,0.0025483586,0.0024220403,0.002521273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014949058,0.00042973642,0.000613016,0.014182309,0.004943051,0.001936976,0.0010870638,0.0026614454,0.00026235962],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080817255,0.00010661836,0.002286719,0.05919044,0.0002750761,0.000755213,0.0059478204,0.00086345105,0.00035975224,0.09116848,0.13938904,0.6995766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015191206,0.00003550433,0.006982167,0.040251773,0.00021064539,0.00030120142,0.0026417114,0.00012671316,0.00025824347,0.0026066287,0.9465188,0.000051562325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82946914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90025675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17053086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048572864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18530113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35242248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312063360","doi":"10.25172/dc.10","title":"Greening Criminal Legal Deserts in Rural Texas","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Criminal justice; Constitution; Political science; Criminology; Rural area; Law; Public defender; Economic Justice; Geography; Sociology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06627981101426933,"score_gpt":0.36527104029009966,"score_spread":0.29899122927583033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312063360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9007576,0.0014106027,0.00024940062,0.029034557,0.00013163664,0.00008815822,0.000521824,0.000052099982,0.067754164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9646865,0.0016106651,0.0005834572,0.0047803624,0.0001328786,0.00008902698,0.00039733324,0.000025757507,0.027694076],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931896,0.00011846556,0.000009180638,0.000053576467,0.00010879433,0.00039113456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801207,0.00018157622,0.00043692338,0.000049814884,0.00021309708,0.0011065537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058201177,0.00018206795,0.00016216884,0.0011248913,0.008869905,0.0026631928,0.0008058816,0.0007904288,0.01288315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012714543,0.00020523532,0.000150545,0.0014628466,0.002946031,0.0011973196,0.00428718,0.001690891,0.0006339647],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024935702,0.0016377587,0.26496586,0.0004960859,0.000056366593,0.005261069,0.10966253,0.0015837857,0.0031774258,0.04168998,0.34743187,0.22378783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006466254,0.00039437428,0.53655833,0.0003948735,0.000016482823,0.00096193946,0.20762925,0.0005576979,0.0005059717,0.006391886,0.2464856,0.00003889587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.090974346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35673702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090974346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057742563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011250495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1808896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312665077","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4284018","title":"Post-Horrocks Judicial Review Appeals: Deference on Questions of Evidence?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University; University of British Columbia; Golder Associates (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Judicial deference; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05672507566631046,"score_gpt":0.3554129226578588,"score_spread":0.2986878469915483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312665077","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4390064,0.0045812894,0.011335568,0.22542383,0.003187873,0.00034380236,0.0004599409,0.00034402095,0.3153173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644771,0.00049749087,0.0013863121,0.014930635,0.0017130639,0.00007936552,0.00006503871,0.000048593243,0.016802467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96896064,0.009423256,0.0016886316,0.0039618844,0.008564468,0.0074012065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6630323,0.26743743,0.014137683,0.013419592,0.032345798,0.009627214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06269502,0.0003947726,0.0017680596,0.0039819996,0.008065626,0.013726891,0.004568056,0.018695798,0.022270834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3858722,0.0009060308,0.0010180974,0.0020166787,0.0069678593,0.011083972,0.0063671656,0.01222292,0.002460638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011030196,0.0008307271,0.030206803,0.0003698072,0.00023572691,0.0044010803,0.014345824,0.0007096747,0.0015262989,0.7079407,0.08821895,0.15011138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000373119,0.0004648131,0.065105006,0.0008125173,0.00032635283,0.0019184755,0.01256665,0.004938192,0.0026479303,0.7996699,0.1109449,0.00023204135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007260289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013492621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06269502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004713602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013474784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33156687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312694957","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4226330","title":"Privacy Dark Patterns: A Case for Regulatory Reform in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Personally identifiable information; Internet privacy; Privacy policy; Information privacy; Business; Information privacy law; Privacy by Design; Legislature; Privacy law; Population; CLARITY; Privacy laws of the United States; The Internet; Political science; Law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.011130648874258535,"score_gpt":0.25894013435475555,"score_spread":0.247809485480497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312694957","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5673058,0.0013452191,0.004024828,0.26713285,0.0003734781,0.0002482529,0.0008027221,0.000106772386,0.15866005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9643851,0.00035060613,0.0011005417,0.017159939,0.00004220505,0.000031961237,0.000088380715,0.00004337142,0.016797885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863237,0.0016203055,0.00031502658,0.0011868215,0.0036852353,0.006868887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9719661,0.0072314595,0.0019530725,0.0015493536,0.010790028,0.006509925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008746054,0.0002376908,0.00080368336,0.0025977928,0.03709696,0.015306133,0.0034238216,0.007895573,0.010442282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036301058,0.00058812875,0.00075875863,0.005670771,0.013806774,0.0040595517,0.0047645583,0.01250557,0.0003703008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027757473,0.00017986791,0.063748926,0.00013196365,0.00010928398,0.0015711559,0.055804744,0.002647726,0.0013160271,0.7432584,0.08023749,0.050716855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038136996,0.00013176889,0.17164724,0.0007151928,0.0002767062,0.0005355571,0.19499066,0.00866275,0.002354744,0.18146951,0.4382145,0.00062001916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9934689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99659616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14338908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14338908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30589285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99354726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312703641","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_3868-2","title":"Same-Sex Marriage in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Demography; Psychology; Genealogy; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.0199130651764603,"score_gpt":0.24154604696517643,"score_spread":0.22163298178871613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312703641","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.111164264,0.031101044,0.0009946217,0.036790494,0.0012040043,0.00016377524,0.0013991409,0.000067354515,0.8171153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.518479,0.018944602,0.0010349117,0.0060323314,0.00013605351,0.00007289527,0.0004102701,0.00006614487,0.4548238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977223,0.00019404774,0.000042138698,0.00015176827,0.00053810317,0.001351697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989298,0.00014601248,0.00003816311,0.000026585676,0.00048125887,0.00037825867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009306641,0.0003731071,0.0006105141,0.0021058426,0.028952787,0.006225704,0.0023533101,0.0033758567,0.018944154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025340482,0.00055863196,0.000505779,0.005625059,0.0047182282,0.0014474378,0.001841332,0.004389739,0.0009178031],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028868564,0.000068990055,0.005872505,0.000094716874,0.000016122436,0.00054639654,0.013873161,0.0010030468,0.00011602265,0.80930865,0.114826955,0.05424464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003668832,0.000030899675,0.034279685,0.0005353026,0.00004442913,0.00033420252,0.038437624,0.001769429,0.00026645864,0.036734767,0.88740945,0.00012097031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9985574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99955875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15207979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15207979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28963172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9834673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323351855","doi":"10.32920/22229284","title":"It Shouldn’t be Small Potatoes: The Future of Civil Damage Awards under Canada’s Personal Information Protection Legislation. Part Two: Inadequate PIPEDA Damages and the Way Forward","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Legislation; Personally identifiable information; Political science; Legislature; Law; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.04086420066099214,"score_gpt":0.2815357231726905,"score_spread":0.24067152251169835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323351855","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0177966,0.020363359,0.0022087437,0.63795906,0.0046739555,0.00014524192,0.0006410893,0.00017377877,0.3160382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36978576,0.019786187,0.0035939512,0.11661472,0.0020382025,0.00013308722,0.0004491248,0.00022705559,0.48737195],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98575914,0.00083435624,0.00021837943,0.0007899767,0.008878648,0.003519578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98303026,0.003086205,0.00047929556,0.0006102792,0.009107618,0.0036863629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007242594,0.00053055654,0.00046737798,0.0017344846,0.016525704,0.018769758,0.0028182825,0.012040334,0.020115532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021327475,0.0005987812,0.00062902854,0.0017191152,0.012812181,0.005355409,0.0029391104,0.00908882,0.0027105259],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000446646,0.000053314834,0.0040072063,0.0001009191,0.0000132462665,0.00023188602,0.0022432294,0.0005229922,0.0004267012,0.34255487,0.58773714,0.062063675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024689838,0.00004129871,0.011028062,0.00046773054,0.000024842793,0.00011407693,0.0037333947,0.00096803,0.00047551142,0.024406558,0.9585826,0.00013324295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96825457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9851505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11058165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11058165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23210603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8023298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323352387","doi":"10.32920/22227886.v1","title":"It Shouldn't Be Small Potatoes: The Future of Civil Damage Awards Under Canada's Personal Information Protection Legislation. Part One: The Nature and Enforcement of the Privacy Interest under PIPEDA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Personally identifiable information; Legislation; Political science; Law; Legislature; Economic Justice; Privacy laws of the United States; Enforcement; Business; Law and economics; Information privacy; Sociology","score_opus":0.0583807773821568,"score_gpt":0.2904150173103474,"score_spread":0.2320342399281906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323352387","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05217587,0.019950494,0.0044877417,0.6417393,0.0022631926,0.00013725902,0.0005334074,0.00013776025,0.27857497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6972637,0.01798437,0.005235957,0.082943276,0.0009742525,0.00010217695,0.00028940407,0.0001281773,0.19507867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861611,0.0011648769,0.00019046039,0.0008612854,0.0079049785,0.0037173252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837389,0.0031141283,0.00058423466,0.00063287327,0.0074585564,0.0044713155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007260808,0.0003853541,0.0004038679,0.0017121384,0.017367499,0.018767843,0.0025143367,0.0074538565,0.008445287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017295394,0.000565318,0.0006333378,0.0016979536,0.014942649,0.005497978,0.003955969,0.008035974,0.00076026184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072778865,0.00006747713,0.009400482,0.000119277836,0.000020710526,0.00039766027,0.004625652,0.001048129,0.000659409,0.7325217,0.1646843,0.086382404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005195442,0.00009274923,0.027557286,0.00066880335,0.000046369107,0.0002126952,0.009762138,0.0026700266,0.00089390937,0.088953905,0.86880267,0.0002875135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9806112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9905297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13541746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13541746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2645207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9825271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323352421","doi":"10.32920/22229284.v1","title":"It Shouldn’t be Small Potatoes: The Future of Civil Damage Awards under Canada’s Personal Information Protection Legislation. Part Two: Inadequate PIPEDA Damages and the Way Forward","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Legislation; Personally identifiable information; Legislature; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.04086420066099214,"score_gpt":0.2815357231726905,"score_spread":0.24067152251169835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323352421","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0177966,0.020363359,0.0022087437,0.63795906,0.0046739555,0.00014524192,0.0006410893,0.00017377877,0.3160382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36978576,0.019786187,0.0035939512,0.11661472,0.0020382025,0.00013308722,0.0004491248,0.00022705559,0.48737195],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98575914,0.00083435624,0.00021837943,0.0007899767,0.008878648,0.003519578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98303026,0.003086205,0.00047929556,0.0006102792,0.009107618,0.0036863629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007242594,0.00053055654,0.00046737798,0.0017344846,0.016525704,0.018769758,0.0028182825,0.012040334,0.020115532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021327475,0.0005987812,0.00062902854,0.0017191152,0.012812181,0.005355409,0.0029391104,0.00908882,0.0027105259],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000446646,0.000053314834,0.0040072063,0.0001009191,0.0000132462665,0.00023188602,0.0022432294,0.0005229922,0.0004267012,0.34255487,0.58773714,0.062063675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024689838,0.00004129871,0.011028062,0.00046773054,0.000024842793,0.00011407693,0.0037333947,0.00096803,0.00047551142,0.024406558,0.9585826,0.00013324295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96825457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9851505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11058165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11058165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23210603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8023298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323352446","doi":"10.32920/22227886","title":"It Shouldn't Be Small Potatoes: The Future of Civil Damage Awards Under Canada's Personal Information Protection Legislation. Part One: The Nature and Enforcement of the Privacy Interest under PIPEDA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Personally identifiable information; Legislation; Political science; Law; Legislature; Enforcement; Economic Justice; Privacy policy; Privacy laws of the United States; FTC Fair Information Practice; Business; Law and economics; Information privacy; Information privacy law; Sociology; Privacy by Design","score_opus":0.0583807773821568,"score_gpt":0.2904150173103474,"score_spread":0.2320342399281906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323352446","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05217587,0.019950494,0.0044877417,0.6417393,0.0022631926,0.00013725902,0.0005334074,0.00013776025,0.27857497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6972637,0.01798437,0.005235957,0.082943276,0.0009742525,0.00010217695,0.00028940407,0.0001281773,0.19507867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861611,0.0011648769,0.00019046039,0.0008612854,0.0079049785,0.0037173252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837389,0.0031141283,0.00058423466,0.00063287327,0.0074585564,0.0044713155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007260808,0.0003853541,0.0004038679,0.0017121384,0.017367499,0.018767843,0.0025143367,0.0074538565,0.008445287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017295394,0.000565318,0.0006333378,0.0016979536,0.014942649,0.005497978,0.003955969,0.008035974,0.00076026184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072778865,0.00006747713,0.009400482,0.000119277836,0.000020710526,0.00039766027,0.004625652,0.001048129,0.000659409,0.7325217,0.1646843,0.086382404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005195442,0.00009274923,0.027557286,0.00066880335,0.000046369107,0.0002126952,0.009762138,0.0026700266,0.00089390937,0.088953905,0.86880267,0.0002875135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9806112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9905297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13541746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13541746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2645207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9825271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323538348","doi":"10.32920/22229284.v2","title":"It Shouldn’t be Small Potatoes: The Future of Civil Damage Awards under Canada’s Personal Information Protection Legislation. Part Two: Inadequate PIPEDA Damages and the Way Forward","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Legislation; Personally identifiable information; Political science; Legislature; Law; Economic Justice; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04086420066099214,"score_gpt":0.2815357231726905,"score_spread":0.24067152251169835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323538348","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0177966,0.020363359,0.0022087437,0.63795906,0.0046739555,0.00014524192,0.0006410893,0.00017377877,0.3160382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36978576,0.019786187,0.0035939512,0.11661472,0.0020382025,0.00013308722,0.0004491248,0.00022705559,0.48737195],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98575914,0.00083435624,0.00021837943,0.0007899767,0.008878648,0.003519578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98303026,0.003086205,0.00047929556,0.0006102792,0.009107618,0.0036863629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007242594,0.00053055654,0.00046737798,0.0017344846,0.016525704,0.018769758,0.0028182825,0.012040334,0.020115532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021327475,0.0005987812,0.00062902854,0.0017191152,0.012812181,0.005355409,0.0029391104,0.00908882,0.0027105259],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000446646,0.000053314834,0.0040072063,0.0001009191,0.0000132462665,0.00023188602,0.0022432294,0.0005229922,0.0004267012,0.34255487,0.58773714,0.062063675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024689838,0.00004129871,0.011028062,0.00046773054,0.000024842793,0.00011407693,0.0037333947,0.00096803,0.00047551142,0.024406558,0.9585826,0.00013324295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96825457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9851505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11058165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11058165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23210603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8023298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323538413","doi":"10.32920/22227886.v2","title":"It Shouldn't Be Small Potatoes: The Future of Civil Damage Awards Under Canada's Personal Information Protection Legislation. Part One: The Nature and Enforcement of the Privacy Interest under PIPEDA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Personally identifiable information; Legislation; Political science; Legislature; Law; Enforcement; Economic Justice; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0583807773821568,"score_gpt":0.2904150173103474,"score_spread":0.2320342399281906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323538413","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05217587,0.019950494,0.0044877417,0.6417393,0.0022631926,0.00013725902,0.0005334074,0.00013776025,0.27857497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6972637,0.01798437,0.005235957,0.082943276,0.0009742525,0.00010217695,0.00028940407,0.0001281773,0.19507867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861611,0.0011648769,0.00019046039,0.0008612854,0.0079049785,0.0037173252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837389,0.0031141283,0.00058423466,0.00063287327,0.0074585564,0.0044713155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007260808,0.0003853541,0.0004038679,0.0017121384,0.017367499,0.018767843,0.0025143367,0.0074538565,0.008445287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017295394,0.000565318,0.0006333378,0.0016979536,0.014942649,0.005497978,0.003955969,0.008035974,0.00076026184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072778865,0.00006747713,0.009400482,0.000119277836,0.000020710526,0.00039766027,0.004625652,0.001048129,0.000659409,0.7325217,0.1646843,0.086382404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005195442,0.00009274923,0.027557286,0.00066880335,0.000046369107,0.0002126952,0.009762138,0.0026700266,0.00089390937,0.088953905,0.86880267,0.0002875135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9806112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9905297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13541746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13541746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2645207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9825271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361029193","doi":"10.1353/sch.2009.0023","title":"Public Diplomacy in the U.S. Supreme Court: The Warren Years—Part II","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Memoir; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Biography; Politics; Diplomacy; Law; Warren Court; State (computer science); Sociology; Art history; History; Political science","score_opus":0.060357327866453515,"score_gpt":0.2870304650667115,"score_spread":0.22667313720025797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361029193","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08982413,0.14867114,0.00059962645,0.41791213,0.0064518135,0.0001808205,0.0006786265,0.00004130771,0.33564037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7314732,0.045925424,0.0004256316,0.09984263,0.010811848,0.0005259574,0.0005581456,0.000057276055,0.110379934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99525523,0.0010049437,0.00013992778,0.0004035664,0.00130817,0.0018882705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996775,0.0013260287,0.0004891077,0.00013266515,0.0003748767,0.0009023803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038301395,0.00040464057,0.00041700975,0.0015506174,0.009155835,0.010415797,0.0014132324,0.00895763,0.007995214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008926245,0.0007061888,0.00046480657,0.0022437347,0.007495412,0.0057266075,0.006781792,0.011508854,0.0009585945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004949158,0.0001852328,0.0059746145,0.00010656276,0.000023459663,0.0006928694,0.011908215,0.00025132412,0.0002706732,0.47460073,0.44730616,0.058630656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003243575,0.00007651327,0.039550655,0.0011859081,0.000023098275,0.00035015214,0.010010858,0.00022398477,0.0003015298,0.03988154,0.90828854,0.00007475802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.104103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20606385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.104103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013846989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012863124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20699412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361288409","doi":"10.3138/chr.104.1.rev15","title":"<i>The Tenth Justice: Judicial Appointments, Marc Nadon, and the Supreme Court Act</i>. Carissima Mathen and Michael Plaxton.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Historical Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.025776165786006902,"score_gpt":0.28092126463009837,"score_spread":0.2551450988440915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361288409","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00052156736,0.54546386,0.00012205633,0.4002934,0.015223463,0.000015555992,0.00019183411,0.000016574515,0.038151737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06721823,0.48503816,0.0008840683,0.28395078,0.021046463,0.00009215112,0.00028985782,0.00008081042,0.14139947],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658823,0.0011569652,0.00018851575,0.00042124835,0.0011728625,0.0004722412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99335974,0.003794851,0.0005789998,0.00011636465,0.0015923465,0.00055772904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00399745,0.0008081021,0.00065634155,0.002859034,0.011053129,0.005160441,0.0024955133,0.008596281,0.0067780637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012982883,0.00078248227,0.00045561092,0.005068203,0.0069770245,0.0051036905,0.001914766,0.0088596735,0.0017788529],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009772482,0.000005656375,0.00015967569,0.00012583377,0.000002828383,0.000041618867,0.0005447969,0.000015758056,0.000013629817,0.028802434,0.9643468,0.0059312237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012838241,0.000005951565,0.002096587,0.0011067884,0.000011111599,0.00007340612,0.0014389034,0.000039342714,0.000079543395,0.008967838,0.98614776,0.000019979565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41978815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7412506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5802119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0136105055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024822166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83468944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382585266","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v14i2.14880","title":"Deductibility of Surrogacy Payments in Canadian Tax Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Tax credit; Tax deduction; Indirect tax; Value-added tax; Business; Tax reform; Direct tax; Public economics; Income tax; Deductible; Ad valorem tax; State income tax; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; Actuarial science; Gross income","score_opus":0.06932076726047351,"score_gpt":0.3876628382342725,"score_spread":0.31834207097379896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382585266","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12440167,0.005243787,0.004280746,0.087725446,0.0009954893,0.00037049683,0.00065739965,0.00011823508,0.77620685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84792143,0.004762703,0.0071012843,0.022219317,0.00026476613,0.00009027736,0.00032003815,0.000050172508,0.11727013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98834085,0.00090309995,0.0004457824,0.0007407827,0.0069695637,0.0025999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98887384,0.0036507049,0.0006340193,0.00060467055,0.005361457,0.0008753698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067218747,0.00027562946,0.00030418957,0.002328684,0.0206672,0.007807392,0.002043108,0.0046636285,0.0059241485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018553117,0.00060663343,0.0005300448,0.002373254,0.009390164,0.0021094892,0.0028511973,0.0055680526,0.00037166965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021105836,0.000029461038,0.004578983,0.000048521466,0.0000072939265,0.00051733776,0.005852178,0.0005264811,0.00036612846,0.9360147,0.033054654,0.018983105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085609594,0.000053527714,0.027373755,0.0006927374,0.0000852043,0.00063704496,0.006660476,0.004508756,0.0013303355,0.077715896,0.8805717,0.00028494134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98093694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9908031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10888974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10888974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21797241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7900541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385357111","doi":"10.59962/9780774867771-010","title":"McCue v. University of British Columbia","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Geography","score_opus":0.021618301451640787,"score_gpt":0.19779820870584183,"score_spread":0.17617990725420105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385357111","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040939073,0.009920317,0.00019442395,0.017189905,0.0009974182,0.0000708972,0.0006525638,0.00008837127,0.9667923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02492301,0.0018620968,0.0001314719,0.012960359,0.00008341392,0.000056808265,0.00010815182,0.000041682248,0.9598331],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980824,0.00013611314,0.00004951006,0.00017302544,0.0007604049,0.00079852017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857366,0.00042528994,0.000047278165,0.00008753964,0.000647933,0.00021830702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008130361,0.00063756877,0.0005397355,0.0022444243,0.017163288,0.00790452,0.0018544535,0.010282481,0.068080075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044996208,0.0010426476,0.0005501293,0.0027384665,0.0016562373,0.002112188,0.0018806492,0.008775699,0.0084443735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050009283,0.00002770507,0.0006848584,0.00010687261,0.000010575598,0.00042689565,0.0011750222,0.00013618081,0.00023380756,0.14635763,0.8214122,0.029378239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017906379,0.0000071787485,0.0020912709,0.00026202973,0.000019470845,0.00007142225,0.00074181415,0.00013397049,0.00019412006,0.0045542214,0.99187136,0.000035220448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9264405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9792865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07355952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027909847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055059023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22775054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385509996","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1425","title":"Reference Re Genetic Non-Discrimination Act: How to Make Space for Some Certainty","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisprudence; Certainty; Political science; Power (physics); Criminal law; Statement (logic); Expansive; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.059303696513317475,"score_gpt":0.3350643466073373,"score_spread":0.27576065009401984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385509996","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005174854,0.028629098,0.06064861,0.78053254,0.007033117,0.00008894174,0.00017838404,0.00030471335,0.11740978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54419285,0.0153843,0.062137965,0.33998725,0.008212948,0.0003734011,0.0001680042,0.00044471602,0.029098485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95707935,0.0188492,0.0023964387,0.0061114426,0.012829952,0.0027336052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9253632,0.05326355,0.0023868214,0.006332444,0.010794536,0.0018594053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050863165,0.0014381313,0.0025450434,0.0030757647,0.013697561,0.02442121,0.0063653314,0.027355801,0.005184767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.107594095,0.0012681294,0.0017079975,0.0020645515,0.07544807,0.0476954,0.010997471,0.037694488,0.0017243327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011252191,0.00000703834,0.000077558194,0.000048182566,0.000009943452,0.00007308612,0.0018379228,0.00031456997,0.000059176222,0.97576004,0.013120833,0.008680426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018598199,0.000016496448,0.00011182922,0.0004246255,0.00002114597,0.00004864206,0.001625222,0.00045186945,0.00017323553,0.83664346,0.16039647,0.000068409856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1051301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.068269834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8948699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019295143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035448257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26899332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512099","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1386","title":"The Law Society of British Columbia v. Trinity Western University: Complicated Answers to a Simple Question","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Law; Columbia university; Political science; Sociology; Media studies","score_opus":0.0417729288231093,"score_gpt":0.2996309573106084,"score_spread":0.2578580284874991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512099","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023601787,0.013538239,0.0010390725,0.7839982,0.0022469657,0.000066326844,0.00035860002,0.000053740674,0.17509708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5071072,0.013386705,0.0023680886,0.35312736,0.0016521364,0.00010955415,0.0003636503,0.00010536141,0.121779904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99396473,0.0013173663,0.00036231373,0.0005695385,0.0018173604,0.0019686741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98844016,0.006393932,0.00036937871,0.00035359926,0.0031250948,0.0013178106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00640194,0.00039513235,0.00057161285,0.001814208,0.016830618,0.01100406,0.002142565,0.015391313,0.0083291195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025651747,0.000689814,0.00037109823,0.0031357643,0.016441721,0.006808831,0.0029534257,0.014985454,0.00096621923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024902016,0.000015936466,0.0023451324,0.00014103514,0.000018116756,0.000898003,0.010897388,0.00021350218,0.00021302678,0.5169004,0.45057347,0.017759057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005418831,0.000018336417,0.008359185,0.0011968716,0.00005938122,0.00054360856,0.032582644,0.00066630996,0.00041538134,0.2138633,0.7420651,0.0001756708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8708485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93802875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12915152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041316275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09129047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2997719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512108","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1383","title":"A Comment on R. v. Reeves: Investigative Issues with Shared Electronic Devices and Data","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Adaptation (eye); Internet privacy; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.10151853592939351,"score_gpt":0.3568311269141614,"score_spread":0.2553125909847679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512108","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021293203,0.002150766,0.00064218155,0.9788296,0.0035916849,0.000064740874,0.00025414096,0.000105113766,0.012232387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006361605,0.0005628268,0.00045917992,0.9852085,0.0014196616,0.000064278,0.000031645,0.00004702118,0.0058452636],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97082865,0.0059041064,0.0022748683,0.005488763,0.010853241,0.004650438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9235841,0.054750387,0.0024162848,0.0019574782,0.013911053,0.0033807259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027553063,0.001446281,0.0029763523,0.0021172643,0.019367406,0.013445057,0.014737764,0.13751857,0.0065000616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08045815,0.0031447338,0.005320837,0.0032646721,0.015029162,0.010073231,0.005921628,0.08491805,0.0046242564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009258068,0.000043649354,0.0009887505,0.00014002215,0.00006694812,0.00093750696,0.003333375,0.00016965932,0.00044475505,0.071558505,0.9166797,0.0055445735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002702098,0.0001391952,0.0038173401,0.0012784749,0.00033313662,0.0009128022,0.0059646764,0.0010217022,0.0018135157,0.043196704,0.94075936,0.00049291365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41792285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5849262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41792285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016154358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04221733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83098054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385589434","doi":"10.59962/9780774868280-011","title":"9 Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.015325412147578215,"score_gpt":0.18952136478962014,"score_spread":0.17419595264204193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385589434","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009927793,0.010895851,0.0003947689,0.10934484,0.0041769454,0.0002594441,0.0024644178,0.00012082382,0.8624151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.060973667,0.0022214141,0.00037929232,0.0495071,0.00067008886,0.000117170974,0.00036207275,0.00008376731,0.8856854],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99600595,0.00025857516,0.00007066794,0.00030021576,0.0015709897,0.0017937203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971951,0.00067196495,0.000047838315,0.00010482614,0.001533024,0.00044722302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001540097,0.0009144529,0.0010912071,0.0025725241,0.030647231,0.011373943,0.002960483,0.021037012,0.04840019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008586314,0.0012122148,0.0011715669,0.0021449612,0.0033452718,0.0017640515,0.0019123489,0.012766325,0.0057576722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006592001,0.00003789448,0.00079738046,0.00005804574,0.000023642291,0.00047795393,0.00077072193,0.00025987515,0.00019295861,0.16337375,0.82614917,0.0077926316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004750517,0.000011397696,0.0045665586,0.00027748567,0.000059085178,0.000066555025,0.0017051352,0.00072692474,0.0003630851,0.017949227,0.9741408,0.0000861664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9807161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99328387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06711839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06711839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09877255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48698032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385598169","doi":"10.59962/9780774866033-003","title":"An Overview of <i>Carter v Canada</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03198619633134538,"score_gpt":0.22736620108634908,"score_spread":0.1953800047550037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385598169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017171032,0.07640428,0.00043974962,0.03134742,0.0016581923,0.00013200696,0.0015423921,0.00009425101,0.8866646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.053318534,0.096033126,0.0016048072,0.050498262,0.0009018483,0.00027555492,0.0012216084,0.00025602616,0.7958903],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724954,0.00021906484,0.0000610238,0.0001581209,0.00123737,0.0010749913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987458,0.00031143858,0.000046551344,0.000036654023,0.00067474024,0.00018487105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012138746,0.0010522638,0.00075672555,0.009633653,0.0178848,0.01375579,0.0026932047,0.007047146,0.04183418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033340994,0.0010645103,0.0007340561,0.015176422,0.004908186,0.0038962546,0.0016275962,0.006374905,0.0044299257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007722472,0.00001938395,0.00022478368,0.00025539874,0.0000054304846,0.00012387008,0.0011659785,0.0002171269,0.000077207966,0.289815,0.68335193,0.02473632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028534869,0.000002978736,0.0010359087,0.0004338986,0.000006251489,0.00004126758,0.000988702,0.00006660475,0.00005134604,0.0083658835,0.98898417,0.000020059995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9872643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99567235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13886566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13886566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17447294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385598822","doi":"10.59962/9780774861076-010","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada Judgments","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.014926406300226071,"score_gpt":0.18954356777884995,"score_spread":0.17461716147862388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385598822","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015439855,0.011019727,0.0006592491,0.05282528,0.00097655994,0.000058236175,0.0007636149,0.00006373159,0.9181939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5030684,0.0053032697,0.0011288797,0.0123031875,0.0004823046,0.000088779765,0.0003265818,0.00014057299,0.477158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912053,0.0010345116,0.0001560457,0.0007538508,0.003984936,0.0028652328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99312264,0.0016271169,0.00015269344,0.00032352188,0.0038621866,0.0009117372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037547091,0.00069734093,0.0009530604,0.0036378007,0.026521044,0.019797273,0.002811574,0.008729187,0.029681982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020067748,0.0010950175,0.00059119845,0.004919223,0.0091071455,0.0037059782,0.002330884,0.008538831,0.0025621147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003818492,0.000021454758,0.00082054007,0.0000421621,0.000016761427,0.00013521047,0.0017088668,0.000539251,0.00007285256,0.7385961,0.24386701,0.014141601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004682445,0.00001226686,0.0064735645,0.0004809719,0.0000691587,0.000056706835,0.0047575827,0.0017812508,0.00035381253,0.18394682,0.8019033,0.000117842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9864601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99463767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14460072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14460072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17446133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9921419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385862342","doi":"10.59962/9780774854443","title":"Eagle Down Is Our Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eagle; Law; Political science; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.019555838676225484,"score_gpt":0.22730905844803587,"score_spread":0.20775321977181038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385862342","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001900762,0.0074640918,0.00060655904,0.089550614,0.016740942,0.00003867155,0.00013709522,0.00019053929,0.88337076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026848674,0.0031461678,0.00035697425,0.037559237,0.0023276226,0.000026085243,0.00009498108,0.00014004065,0.92950016],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997274,0.0003886324,0.0000879627,0.0006125663,0.0011618946,0.00047503825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982522,0.00029196902,0.00008852233,0.00024275125,0.0006223245,0.0005021911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011244768,0.00048539756,0.00033275175,0.0004996272,0.005550596,0.008639434,0.0007337941,0.0044361083,0.13854021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067474404,0.00029377308,0.00027874732,0.00047972274,0.0050317403,0.0058409744,0.0037063882,0.0076563843,0.034727808],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009256533,0.00001594047,0.00030157578,0.000038229133,0.000003434593,0.00028096137,0.001730678,0.000011560013,0.00019562185,0.08244042,0.8838905,0.031081794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.1619063e-7,0.0000028526424,0.00011202186,0.000038826674,7.105029e-7,0.00006122745,0.0005303838,0.000003913054,0.000024140838,0.0012799791,0.99794275,0.0000022094232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02267321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030160591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9773268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032864048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004752245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4634632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385870803","doi":"10.59962/9780774851954-015","title":"New Directions for Canadian Environmental Law and Policy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental law; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.017713804409603087,"score_gpt":0.21335545332031775,"score_spread":0.19564164891071467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385870803","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019380774,0.030772788,0.0022016708,0.5169812,0.007176172,0.00007967807,0.0008708375,0.0002802429,0.4396994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10446663,0.06800422,0.018279364,0.0892081,0.0034071766,0.00026367733,0.0011541472,0.0003722067,0.7148445],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99324197,0.00081117573,0.00017214278,0.00037229754,0.0036200143,0.0017824223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99107426,0.0011228498,0.00012434908,0.00033046232,0.00560357,0.0017444683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007079438,0.0012768066,0.0008689327,0.0059315814,0.01881424,0.02137539,0.0030782337,0.008727742,0.075375155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013255858,0.0009422909,0.0010579121,0.007502882,0.013806489,0.01023216,0.0031504058,0.008902603,0.0037855837],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006601454,0.000014432728,0.0001527161,0.000068522706,0.000004025686,0.00003331517,0.0007258194,0.00023329369,0.00003311163,0.37328312,0.59957886,0.025866188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011510713,0.000002621621,0.0004915247,0.000233847,0.000011109161,0.000012626864,0.001892293,0.00035593504,0.000040037496,0.07207968,0.9248393,0.000029523122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9916236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99608886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17350112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17350112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3876155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95862156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386131694","doi":"10.59962/9780774854801-014","title":"Foregoing Life-Sustaining Treatment: The Canadian Law Reform Commission and the President’s Commission","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Law; Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.03332835995999916,"score_gpt":0.22772239544262152,"score_spread":0.19439403548262235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386131694","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006185229,0.049968805,0.0003523135,0.6587623,0.008519184,0.00009416995,0.00028341048,0.000040561095,0.27579394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22341235,0.031571716,0.0011343741,0.22336338,0.0035725005,0.00014931549,0.0002508702,0.00013297198,0.5164125],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898018,0.0013541622,0.0001727984,0.0005871889,0.0038006261,0.0042834897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99138814,0.001834556,0.00023087178,0.00023336122,0.0036052517,0.002707723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008587763,0.00087507867,0.0008593201,0.002605355,0.035482984,0.021134803,0.0034600713,0.022063356,0.01466424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02018711,0.00096919446,0.00058194436,0.004612831,0.016794952,0.0063647977,0.0034835916,0.019825384,0.0012537123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020992724,0.00002698315,0.0003768573,0.000043557462,0.00000894596,0.000082573315,0.0032835484,0.00015606369,0.000044878838,0.32982132,0.6474287,0.01870557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027728767,0.0000083854975,0.0025104631,0.00035613068,0.00002421967,0.00003408525,0.005787986,0.00016243182,0.000073546384,0.028462099,0.9624724,0.00008057494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99016786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99731976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19440351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19440351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.41691557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93437773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387476091","doi":"10.61575/mjls.1.mastering","title":"Mastering the Drift – An Introduction to the Michigan Journal of Law &amp; Society","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Merck Canada Inc. (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.030704839606973598,"score_gpt":0.3058395950936951,"score_spread":0.2751347554867215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387476091","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002870579,0.18817161,0.0019735731,0.21162671,0.03340482,0.000052998275,0.00022461984,0.00015860403,0.5615165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09857085,0.15745611,0.0034884997,0.048532642,0.1045761,0.00025582867,0.0002853126,0.00033337547,0.58650124],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915934,0.00034597755,0.00003628204,0.000104877676,0.00026862,0.00008485756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993253,0.00024509573,0.000041717703,0.00004943575,0.00010622189,0.00023225279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010914864,0.0007662424,0.00037104994,0.0024909463,0.007116838,0.008261352,0.0010145182,0.0035311414,0.03201771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016831806,0.00032715328,0.00034391799,0.0017876278,0.009104797,0.0061749844,0.0030531292,0.005000956,0.00501629],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006637871,0.00004695144,0.00060966116,0.0000786843,0.0000043771593,0.000081314276,0.0013684338,0.00008164227,0.000106835774,0.2694244,0.687775,0.040416125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.153795e-7,0.0000063356556,0.00072056084,0.00022526195,9.980697e-7,0.0000490625,0.00047785448,0.00009154576,0.000017745888,0.016997566,0.9814069,0.0000054053558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013173499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03646061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03201771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00648105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039810673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107109904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387565677","doi":"10.1515/9780887559310-010","title":"<i>Daniels v. Canada</i> beyond Jurisprudential Interpretation: What to Do Once the Horse Has Left the Barn","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Manitoba Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Barn; Interpretation (philosophy); Horse; Law; Political science; Philosophy; History; Archaeology; Biology","score_opus":0.021581328086954978,"score_gpt":0.21729136929445747,"score_spread":0.1957100412075025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387565677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023655281,0.019522144,0.0005233117,0.10497171,0.0011875338,0.000041936684,0.00039218785,0.00004853091,0.8709471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.089660615,0.012737309,0.001256697,0.09116098,0.00037819636,0.00007215355,0.00024027958,0.00010602335,0.8043878],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976713,0.00021427617,0.000038354494,0.00016764972,0.0011585997,0.0007497941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867696,0.00032276625,0.000044336637,0.00003551721,0.0007425337,0.0001779721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014141492,0.00055389863,0.0004060229,0.0016191747,0.019391015,0.008578625,0.0023194014,0.0076541784,0.019018378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035844608,0.0004942778,0.0004489481,0.0030660187,0.011009993,0.0033043644,0.0016995781,0.007203613,0.002806685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008173779,0.0000073578717,0.0003325092,0.000059371025,0.00000329949,0.00009958709,0.003046666,0.00006839242,0.000095138195,0.4644072,0.5236953,0.008176984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007724643,0.0000030865604,0.0011529031,0.0002716391,0.00000828893,0.000052463143,0.0032036207,0.00009340968,0.00016755352,0.027187921,0.9678297,0.000021675789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9656892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9898601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061155822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061155822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12384536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44371867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387565703","doi":"10.1515/9780887559310","title":"Daniels v. Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Manitoba Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.02695305703765634,"score_gpt":0.20383362988505588,"score_spread":0.17688057284739955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387565703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031996218,0.0058306544,0.00026963782,0.011320672,0.00045260217,0.00003258704,0.00050953275,0.000057386816,0.97832733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07666984,0.0045957486,0.0003501855,0.017199995,0.0001097056,0.000048006154,0.0002418702,0.00005430728,0.9007304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796104,0.000092025235,0.000027200893,0.0001748882,0.00091087964,0.00083392975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990609,0.0001331826,0.000025100377,0.0000340908,0.00058245944,0.00016414426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066370494,0.0004154595,0.00031948765,0.0015415297,0.022764158,0.0052108974,0.0010466798,0.0035096302,0.024398854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022032505,0.0004351796,0.0004714558,0.0019382465,0.0035753725,0.001121223,0.0016970905,0.0037287239,0.0026748716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020279283,0.0000074092527,0.00097486743,0.0000860514,0.0000067732058,0.00032021056,0.002270376,0.00013966601,0.00020036573,0.5270059,0.44739738,0.021570675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007903377,0.0000040318296,0.0010259446,0.000113009104,0.000008129302,0.000097172466,0.0008262326,0.000068458045,0.0001590383,0.008318334,0.9893551,0.000016706323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97188765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99003613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0455739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0455739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10603536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33066338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387867841","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4585828","title":"The Gatekeepers of the Federal Arbitration Act: An Empirical Analysis of the FAA in the Lower Courts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Federal Arbitration Act; Arbitration; Business; Law; Compulsory arbitration; Political science","score_opus":0.01809509419109677,"score_gpt":0.32635863190896697,"score_spread":0.3082635377178702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387867841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9749624,0.00025566467,0.00073717604,0.0016647148,0.0000124553435,0.000048580132,0.0000657878,0.000008101477,0.022245001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989911,0.000035982404,0.00009333419,0.00009333062,0.00000693695,0.00001316403,0.000013155397,0.000001417778,0.0007517009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99007976,0.004550498,0.0004666778,0.0006992177,0.0021882001,0.0020156933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8591689,0.11381767,0.016862007,0.0025649709,0.004252024,0.0033345295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009653311,0.0001848815,0.0006209242,0.0025452068,0.005789335,0.0070528206,0.0012191051,0.0038985186,0.004430445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.091927215,0.0003224079,0.0004165221,0.002179234,0.0051630093,0.0042502037,0.0016993443,0.00404852,0.00038486582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008591371,0.0017585288,0.37375164,0.00014984039,0.0001689289,0.0010829163,0.030852182,0.006629195,0.0017231143,0.5342052,0.0064704106,0.042349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002528938,0.0007150273,0.75139505,0.0004082595,0.00033268303,0.0003596129,0.035236362,0.022972668,0.0021013094,0.15858965,0.027465863,0.00017068064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047124885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055129435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047124885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006372752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009350986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093701184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388137275","doi":"10.1515/9781552389911-015","title":"Canadian Bill of Rights, 1960","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bill of rights; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.021970299098232567,"score_gpt":0.21173792215251358,"score_spread":0.18976762305428102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388137275","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019880678,0.019910045,0.00026173645,0.016600735,0.0013982462,0.00007870049,0.0015750062,0.000054775533,0.9581327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037735686,0.00928287,0.0006588696,0.008136857,0.0003780832,0.0001348766,0.0004952893,0.000075364085,0.9431022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99634594,0.00027370037,0.00012795931,0.00045307513,0.0018415741,0.0009577959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986842,0.00017269279,0.000039525003,0.00013351678,0.0008006157,0.00016942642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015706463,0.0013647551,0.0008870114,0.0045674727,0.015770255,0.010407553,0.0019954846,0.009107404,0.03435441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064175706,0.0014296767,0.0006314134,0.006880789,0.00718009,0.003862644,0.0022741843,0.0105581675,0.0053315177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017715478,0.000021999886,0.00014230912,0.000043206488,0.0000051571997,0.00005587039,0.00073416956,0.0001533266,0.000031823212,0.6326733,0.3524097,0.0137113575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000132450095,0.0000034516893,0.00085872447,0.00012596513,0.0000059948397,0.000022833656,0.000246663,0.000055562807,0.00004306959,0.03170931,0.9668957,0.00001946571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9605569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9824905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10725936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10725936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11098505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7782248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388892008","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4640252","title":"Getting Personal: The Promise and Potential Missteps of Canada’s New Privacy Legislation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Business; Internet privacy; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.01190959722124211,"score_gpt":0.25629803267087276,"score_spread":0.24438843544963065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388892008","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032315534,0.0031332073,0.0010320812,0.8558728,0.0016703189,0.0000622451,0.00049976964,0.000072839655,0.105341226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4631607,0.0035937557,0.0036042617,0.39891946,0.0013001949,0.00011139811,0.0002530829,0.00020152105,0.12885556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9601604,0.004551061,0.00090244954,0.0030171908,0.018052435,0.013316578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9365613,0.021545807,0.0016389824,0.0031140605,0.02148336,0.015656494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024064647,0.0005800317,0.0011226989,0.0025283487,0.038675506,0.027973978,0.005929666,0.034792572,0.016522024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063859455,0.0012185838,0.0015757543,0.0033712396,0.021099407,0.011874469,0.0064674285,0.030025851,0.0012277628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014296324,0.00009078738,0.004919558,0.00009232575,0.000054685705,0.0005108773,0.010977761,0.00045898126,0.00049108197,0.59791505,0.3600257,0.02432026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015071318,0.00007112319,0.014159795,0.0006218141,0.00015112972,0.00026372704,0.017460058,0.0017074336,0.0010216507,0.08902921,0.87494886,0.0004144603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9881126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13846016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13846016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3804239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390722069","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4668394","title":"Broader Application and Implications: A Federal Court (Non-IRB) Case Law Year in Review for 2023","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Federal court; Supreme court","score_opus":0.01375665776531502,"score_gpt":0.3370695961550257,"score_spread":0.32331293838971065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390722069","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011449217,0.16120431,0.0024237402,0.63803613,0.06283503,0.00066447473,0.0029263713,0.00019946814,0.120261244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18475339,0.08687397,0.010658066,0.5742461,0.03744742,0.0016791084,0.0023431594,0.00032845436,0.101670265],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.972384,0.0074044443,0.0026904726,0.0038095627,0.009381136,0.004330357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8699773,0.07396156,0.0070514604,0.0059139966,0.037062757,0.0060329293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053074617,0.00093699,0.002591603,0.011260901,0.0070512416,0.015204156,0.0035506175,0.02659327,0.016068943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15086617,0.0010299771,0.0033752087,0.0071193655,0.0046730647,0.009835984,0.0044001797,0.012888068,0.003974829],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045040683,0.00018752461,0.0023627006,0.0030876226,0.00024310016,0.0009722449,0.0014041215,0.0004423172,0.0015287291,0.1585001,0.7284283,0.10239285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015325483,0.00023649265,0.01504036,0.0072170985,0.00040562722,0.00032527215,0.0012851495,0.0003787518,0.00065190886,0.031515773,0.9426302,0.00016024035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.106327884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24386126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.106327884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01714543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044017047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28068876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391090089","doi":"","title":"Marriage and Advance Consent to Sex: A Feminist Judgment in <em>R v JA</em>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.22092094369302567,"score_gpt":0.5575377292074917,"score_spread":0.336616785514466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391090089","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08446939,0.009787828,0.005596484,0.5297281,0.002720217,0.00017796982,0.00012928178,0.000036693607,0.3673541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7800329,0.0026110564,0.0023182102,0.13252741,0.0011663643,0.0000887211,0.00003294426,0.000042192045,0.08118022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98916304,0.0050422386,0.0003683874,0.0010093474,0.0021146552,0.0023023512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99456644,0.003873959,0.00018445279,0.00014425465,0.00070900423,0.00052182365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01208262,0.00029632472,0.00054771284,0.0004380838,0.020881882,0.0077099274,0.0020699715,0.012859684,0.002521339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012672016,0.0004289976,0.00056636403,0.0004135118,0.025364172,0.0036143248,0.0034183885,0.016650667,0.000376906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034175773,0.000028652752,0.0007055082,0.000041262712,0.000005855982,0.0011638218,0.058075275,0.00018177234,0.00044760937,0.89225876,0.03837553,0.0086817285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044437915,0.000107370106,0.0026614622,0.0004640203,0.000031963016,0.00062643754,0.06440779,0.0007818933,0.001582521,0.1392148,0.7899179,0.00015938876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44348225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6112259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44348225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018095594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027910875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8818018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391600400","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1432","title":"“’Tis a rock—a crag—a cape? A cape? say rather a peninsula!” The Supreme Court of Canada’s Revisitation of the National Concern Doctrine","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Doctrine; Peninsula; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Political science; Cape; Law; Geography; Archaeology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04229890318743268,"score_gpt":0.3157237289327867,"score_spread":0.27342482574535404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391600400","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060244944,0.0080638,0.013591134,0.38675803,0.00251206,0.00010802541,0.0005040738,0.000105690684,0.52811223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75739604,0.002999551,0.0050239568,0.14018431,0.0005509941,0.000046622397,0.00012008827,0.00007315389,0.09360524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99390334,0.00075894746,0.00012981571,0.000717894,0.0033511475,0.0011388307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99578875,0.0013283576,0.00013831024,0.00016923045,0.0022776998,0.00029764953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049516354,0.00026731327,0.00038277073,0.00088515953,0.01414819,0.008051813,0.0020524238,0.0069391606,0.0024435713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010784475,0.00040009947,0.0005586258,0.0012644171,0.018877253,0.0029073376,0.0019682073,0.013912404,0.00031587356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003733748,0.00000320998,0.00036909123,0.000011752306,0.0000044097933,0.00009364472,0.0016005085,0.00014346189,0.00015747972,0.9681694,0.026197422,0.0032458971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035768913,0.000027896469,0.0067842277,0.0003214012,0.000038995036,0.00017908779,0.0047897273,0.0022802402,0.0014554424,0.20559397,0.7783261,0.00016709669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9563098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96984667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9496987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050301287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09773398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36496305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391714162","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_3868","title":"Same-Sex Marriage in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03137412374798617,"score_gpt":0.25685168362118244,"score_spread":0.22547755987319626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391714162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11467149,0.030845841,0.00100263,0.035907384,0.0011635321,0.00015775306,0.0013990409,0.00006839576,0.814784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5258197,0.018510837,0.0010096536,0.0056057936,0.00013238216,0.00006724912,0.00040374184,0.00006417886,0.44838643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978477,0.00018465305,0.000040094794,0.00014476896,0.00051029917,0.0012725242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894613,0.00014178792,0.000038175313,0.000026333772,0.0004735391,0.00037389217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009053748,0.00035549892,0.0005955112,0.00205288,0.027635654,0.006072959,0.002270447,0.0031565544,0.018936923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024671343,0.0005368919,0.00049286376,0.0055334275,0.0046290457,0.0013972066,0.0018110634,0.0042145853,0.000903239],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029217832,0.0000688477,0.006113639,0.00009411433,0.000016230255,0.0005391556,0.013813214,0.0010037589,0.00011718226,0.80718905,0.11409496,0.056920733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035939123,0.000030656454,0.035623316,0.0005246722,0.000044379525,0.00033200922,0.038223047,0.0017945356,0.00026263637,0.036544874,0.8864669,0.00011713017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99852055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99955803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14971893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14971893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28224763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9862055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391796722","doi":"10.7202/1100533ar","title":"NOTES FOR THE REMARKS CONCERNING CANADA AND THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Human rights; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022229991756490916,"score_gpt":0.27704811944173385,"score_spread":0.2548181276852429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391796722","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012968453,0.026151938,0.0010712671,0.68172157,0.045107093,0.0004746213,0.005934659,0.0002595284,0.2379824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018540934,0.007961937,0.0024024427,0.4805868,0.0065355254,0.00049407076,0.0011548756,0.00024519733,0.4820783],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99161714,0.0009070482,0.0005452354,0.0008844669,0.004043872,0.0020022935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897809,0.0026362995,0.00049926015,0.00037865,0.0060724327,0.00063245517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00502647,0.0013161247,0.0013095152,0.0018887061,0.015462654,0.0067389896,0.0043665883,0.022322485,0.046883736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01772997,0.0010510329,0.0016108151,0.003996689,0.004975136,0.0037810795,0.0026607332,0.019556383,0.013665349],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018369934,0.00000941429,0.00008329181,0.00004867323,0.0000051677785,0.00006658351,0.00033030662,0.00003978352,0.000070002345,0.02164875,0.9757648,0.0019148311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023177054,0.000008872882,0.0009897127,0.00019584541,0.00001070914,0.000029140903,0.00053127157,0.00005261786,0.00015023652,0.0039657904,0.9939912,0.000051454685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.899096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9315915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10090399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039931994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04842338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28972828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392031090","doi":"10.5040/9798216024354.ch-060","title":"Passage of the British North America Act (Constitution Act), Canada (1867)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.008000494164984686,"score_gpt":0.22893217305100327,"score_spread":0.22093167888601858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392031090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026797324,0.003763791,0.00026118127,0.0111334715,0.000832682,0.00015875987,0.008960379,0.00009990693,0.97211015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021312188,0.0029961837,0.0005987021,0.00719785,0.00015989646,0.00016516622,0.0020611687,0.000081032435,0.9654278],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967205,0.00022113776,0.00012434872,0.00023125275,0.0018066528,0.00089612656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707806,0.00026387462,0.00011009251,0.000107793574,0.0020941286,0.0003461472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014444058,0.0006346279,0.00039590264,0.0022291616,0.010950237,0.005047916,0.0013736764,0.006752619,0.04293514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049703275,0.0004876235,0.00041182572,0.004491251,0.0025605785,0.0013572599,0.0015866909,0.004536993,0.012786925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024103747,0.000038744478,0.0007916928,0.000070896625,0.0000045178776,0.00017416693,0.0011164306,0.00013127529,0.00015044917,0.18429498,0.7964445,0.016758187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000126744235,0.000004771743,0.006094722,0.0001230495,0.000004711498,0.00003153504,0.00043908792,0.000050272898,0.00010126759,0.0025761458,0.99054,0.000021620022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9692439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9819999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04293514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037872534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09448202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27478576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393404971","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i3.1306","title":"Recoding Family Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06788317923485174,"score_gpt":0.3306276168105635,"score_spread":0.26274443757571175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393404971","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06641639,0.013201736,0.07505414,0.08004314,0.0022228109,0.0001469715,0.0010055469,0.00043814452,0.7614712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9081156,0.0028561158,0.00711175,0.0061194496,0.000323611,0.000070291004,0.00020231215,0.00010652056,0.07509432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621886,0.0012654483,0.00010489704,0.0005657619,0.0010220695,0.0008230735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99553204,0.0010335636,0.00026768542,0.0005787389,0.0022714909,0.00031637514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038624757,0.00061152154,0.00041535418,0.0033028538,0.010231823,0.0076196953,0.0023557732,0.0027336706,0.009581356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008058469,0.0002606418,0.00040642274,0.0017596806,0.023599887,0.0062474906,0.0036747134,0.004050029,0.00054261147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002730733,0.0000024571966,0.00067582814,0.000014555668,0.00000193686,0.00016006449,0.0094130365,0.00018944968,0.00004157282,0.9738709,0.007111654,0.008515895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009187004,0.000010392562,0.0038076187,0.00040762595,0.000015948375,0.0005012929,0.022114426,0.0017139498,0.00026463062,0.20052557,0.77057546,0.000053893775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88408005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8703746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88408005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.066575736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037535183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48304302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395031071","doi":"10.29173/alr2742","title":"Reflections on the Supreme Court of Canada's Decision in R. v. Sharma","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.06710597164751762,"score_gpt":0.3782064975901769,"score_spread":0.31110052594265925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395031071","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017470017,0.013125398,0.0010585873,0.754276,0.0076960716,0.00014716196,0.0007644513,0.00010576767,0.20535658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25789055,0.008496609,0.0025386852,0.5823781,0.0032752107,0.00014304974,0.00035351503,0.00023939971,0.1446849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9698683,0.003163428,0.0008029263,0.0037480218,0.01244953,0.00996771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98093534,0.0060768374,0.0004293801,0.0003219935,0.0086119,0.0036245054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0144699225,0.0009243151,0.0013268933,0.0024279475,0.053306166,0.022847464,0.007875388,0.03278921,0.008376674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027008513,0.0015388158,0.0020935086,0.003078241,0.018449489,0.0047851945,0.0049046376,0.035247438,0.001150916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005316284,0.00004493437,0.0015016141,0.00015081913,0.000046719542,0.0016515305,0.0076475684,0.00066192995,0.00093019253,0.5491569,0.42389846,0.014256156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112427224,0.00006805952,0.0059654387,0.0009971159,0.0001234536,0.00031844646,0.010628379,0.0009903635,0.001035109,0.05526276,0.92393214,0.00056618534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98609066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99326116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17855136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17855136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27569178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.952764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395031145","doi":"10.29173/alr2749","title":"Twenty Years After Krieger v Law Society of Alberta: Law Society Discipline of Crown Prosecutors and Government Lawyers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Crown (dentistry); Legal profession; Sociology; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.014371476569757418,"score_gpt":0.2890085289352133,"score_spread":0.2746370523654559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395031145","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11214646,0.5068886,0.0013675715,0.15124074,0.0049468367,0.00015552291,0.0008163721,0.00008099121,0.22235684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6893504,0.13471967,0.0016966055,0.05780213,0.0013700135,0.00006898047,0.0006481157,0.000041553976,0.11430244],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925315,0.0010172004,0.00026564044,0.00061454676,0.004179305,0.0013918353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97873724,0.0067438986,0.0011358655,0.00037142684,0.011501872,0.001509686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073005278,0.0002280918,0.0003278033,0.0031133015,0.0062888023,0.0048104944,0.0014519845,0.0043999585,0.0021115558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017587105,0.0004763308,0.00029386804,0.005464149,0.004849819,0.0012949661,0.001173451,0.003637343,0.00028619],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016713233,0.000114944305,0.04255013,0.0019729678,0.00020265873,0.0012688187,0.020235367,0.00072994624,0.0017968907,0.2941445,0.3114409,0.3253757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003739325,0.00006883222,0.12642808,0.0012221778,0.00018721534,0.00024510737,0.0063456134,0.00019000837,0.0008080733,0.0053717108,0.8589904,0.000105346895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9642767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9898135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054997582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054997582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11902046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39903724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395048323","doi":"10.21991/cf29469","title":"Abortion Rights Without Law: A Constitutional Reflection","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional law; Abortion; Political science; Law; Reflection (computer programming); Computer science; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.023635029024650367,"score_gpt":0.3222993437780244,"score_spread":0.298664314753374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395048323","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015815565,0.004782523,0.002730728,0.74384296,0.0020307412,0.00005662183,0.00026846805,0.000064861866,0.23040755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6337702,0.004702715,0.004304767,0.26225662,0.0014379937,0.00007685912,0.00017620278,0.00012758654,0.09314706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98464495,0.002544728,0.0004005619,0.0018007151,0.0058859503,0.004722965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904917,0.003948242,0.0003215439,0.0005609493,0.0029396801,0.0017378951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0142502235,0.0005135902,0.0007070303,0.00170237,0.028821139,0.019992616,0.004377475,0.01861974,0.0077703423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019646635,0.0005907166,0.0008255144,0.0019536084,0.06998222,0.008236168,0.0055215717,0.027694264,0.0006106732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043356486,0.000008653259,0.00018434522,0.000012850061,0.0000034535867,0.000075704644,0.00458905,0.00012368683,0.00010095718,0.97599256,0.01662281,0.0022815748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046985406,0.000017168848,0.0018638743,0.00024001073,0.000033790013,0.00009681615,0.014996506,0.00071793917,0.0004662097,0.29800147,0.6833835,0.00013570134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97433996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9759477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97433996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1503743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22049841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9854454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395059230","doi":"10.29173/alr2713","title":"The Most-Cited Law Review Articles of All Time by the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.018299248359572924,"score_gpt":0.26902947451643044,"score_spread":0.2507302261568575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395059230","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18889257,0.39126247,0.0016199299,0.022816401,0.007673027,0.0011826188,0.07699762,0.0005137182,0.30904174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6802301,0.196505,0.007027544,0.0039339154,0.00275647,0.0004504541,0.023101905,0.0003827292,0.085611895],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98416406,0.0010503586,0.001344602,0.0007788633,0.011629337,0.0010327457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8797,0.017585108,0.012415249,0.0016266543,0.083719894,0.0049530193],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038262042,0.00048677987,0.00079981226,0.07567583,0.0051099365,0.0069620907,0.0011169119,0.00070098095,0.0073900535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055021722,0.00029856755,0.0005411395,0.084079415,0.0014207623,0.0011809516,0.0015322785,0.0006550449,0.0015763695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021774483,0.00007147409,0.11328311,0.019467738,0.0006877061,0.002290505,0.0103767365,0.00039955747,0.006913897,0.008989666,0.40382385,0.43347803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002314271,0.000034598947,0.30913377,0.0070207845,0.00045301268,0.001035872,0.0063720797,0.00024680013,0.0021872725,0.0009190087,0.6724879,0.000085723506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6468476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88410765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9961738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020962285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06751932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71046436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395458459","doi":"10.1515/9780228020219-013","title":"8 Courts, Legislatures, and the Politics of Judicial Decision-Making (or Perhaps the Notwithstanding Clause Isn’t Such a Bad Thing after All)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Politics; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01614891151882679,"score_gpt":0.25573111559982575,"score_spread":0.23958220408099895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395458459","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00096058974,0.011629012,0.0010564027,0.039572526,0.0008135367,0.000016873477,0.00017403546,0.000030652274,0.9457464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.089783676,0.011893185,0.0017636225,0.014792918,0.0008123599,0.00006159136,0.0002182643,0.000079678226,0.88059455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779534,0.0006863313,0.000031488955,0.00015848303,0.0009673734,0.00036097772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988458,0.0005932202,0.000055960416,0.00007386409,0.00033767332,0.0000934649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001685526,0.00038765144,0.000248515,0.0008130357,0.00549341,0.007039992,0.00071454095,0.0036689914,0.021024091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033421747,0.00033939772,0.00021154623,0.0015819744,0.011609858,0.0027381682,0.0011441713,0.0044056373,0.004317157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020235589,0.000003797945,0.00004613894,0.000016139844,7.522001e-7,0.000010665059,0.0005317057,0.000065236774,0.000033368622,0.85933715,0.13444164,0.00551141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005760775,0.0000032956398,0.0006134574,0.0001461135,0.0000027452354,0.000019490348,0.0008716976,0.00014834496,0.00010057251,0.16986601,0.8282147,0.000007846722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33776823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5191082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6622318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016529387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026087241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6716044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396882011","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2405.06156","title":"A Sharp Test for the Judge Leniency Design","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Science and Technology Council; National Taiwan University; Academia Sinica","keywords":"Test (biology); Psychology; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Law and economics; Geology","score_opus":0.16425648747758662,"score_gpt":0.24284961424064527,"score_spread":0.07859312676305866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396882011","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075243846,0.00067805016,0.9013647,0.0037253834,0.00033821486,0.0018483637,0.0006496574,0.0005215969,0.015630256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76070875,0.00028990436,0.2272255,0.0031026625,0.00048462555,0.004005983,0.0005687968,0.00011131738,0.0035024548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.81510127,0.13378865,0.007143944,0.02126649,0.019305214,0.003394511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.32180095,0.59510875,0.03401984,0.033546273,0.011953783,0.003570391],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.20430692,0.0024937238,0.0056797825,0.004363503,0.0025415753,0.0064873383,0.008181213,0.011066226,0.019032052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.56290567,0.0017177984,0.0044104382,0.0033185128,0.019820567,0.013330239,0.007748447,0.015428245,0.002012175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017359048,0.00048717673,0.018294645,0.0007061755,0.0010034303,0.0005676948,0.0010133977,0.023130778,0.001516069,0.8728729,0.004491251,0.07418054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016467979,0.002737815,0.0076066162,0.00025798162,0.00042581503,0.00040155882,0.00035040203,0.08818668,0.0031648458,0.8878766,0.007175101,0.00016977065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006596124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039422707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20430692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026505208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052096345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9812312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398138443","doi":"10.4324/9781003279112-7","title":"Navigating Judicial Disagreement","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03042245711701254,"score_gpt":0.3362594225049438,"score_spread":0.30583696538793126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398138443","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037529543,0.008497298,0.1334847,0.03888153,0.00083680777,0.00014005708,0.00022320267,0.00023346646,0.78017336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8189992,0.0056287427,0.063859075,0.0059102117,0.00057364156,0.00026767649,0.00040702423,0.00034581358,0.104008555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916779,0.0048632775,0.00018307814,0.0008524539,0.0017579518,0.00066522206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892067,0.0082890075,0.0004937566,0.0007902735,0.0008126727,0.0004075361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010543438,0.00055867794,0.00073804194,0.0028730622,0.00801395,0.017319942,0.002517496,0.0041643768,0.009261728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01987911,0.00041798822,0.0004985822,0.003213642,0.017284868,0.01697735,0.010144135,0.0069043487,0.0015763832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000527143,0.000011633629,0.00045032334,0.000043105287,0.000003834571,0.000107723514,0.014591271,0.0005609407,0.000111487934,0.94893587,0.007782393,0.027396284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005413751,0.0000075101016,0.0002760115,0.00018361099,0.000003818342,0.000064602194,0.014458149,0.0016389746,0.00017621175,0.83421797,0.14895736,0.000010346361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003141341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055343434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017319942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070762443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065335766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05575967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398290712","doi":"10.7910/dvn/dyzdvw","title":"Petition of John Grout Sr.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grout; Geology; Geotechnical engineering; Forensic engineering; Engineering","score_opus":0.020809713924007735,"score_gpt":0.2876695076056493,"score_spread":0.2668597936816416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398290712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013909355,0.0018625391,0.0003074277,0.018680733,0.008873787,0.00013609354,0.0008515469,0.0003425972,0.96755445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002494236,0.00019089575,0.000098599,0.0027717685,0.00036262567,0.000026457328,0.00013456824,0.00008558606,0.9938352],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790657,0.00017260175,0.00005258787,0.00047273605,0.0008998982,0.00049565185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874544,0.00014710035,0.00005202619,0.00011394265,0.0005433049,0.0003981437],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001422567,0.0008873115,0.0007499433,0.0014297577,0.008252843,0.005621308,0.0016250467,0.0055830353,0.42898992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003891365,0.00081095815,0.0006868513,0.0008120265,0.001382403,0.0020962867,0.0030566305,0.0063821585,0.22003677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025200536,0.000014370902,0.00011528446,0.000026590456,0.000002018697,0.00013337632,0.00009650077,0.000022919432,0.0001366019,0.009445521,0.98235977,0.007621815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003728301,0.000011371539,0.0003992132,0.00004149334,0.0000021071048,0.00005907767,0.00012099637,0.000028021068,0.000104245424,0.00044313408,0.99878067,0.0000058731093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03550914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1239102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42898992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029219685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004728147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8144766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399060784","doi":"10.29173/mlj748","title":"Playing Hardball with Repeat Offenders: Some Thoughts on the Three-Strikes Reverse Onus Dangerous Offender Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.06903938991704757,"score_gpt":0.25879803244528704,"score_spread":0.18975864252823949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399060784","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18311913,0.010959535,0.0015353693,0.72765404,0.0034238198,0.00010818999,0.00008014108,0.000038267033,0.07308153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7799969,0.010256658,0.002452733,0.17091367,0.0037971034,0.00014180546,0.00005263989,0.00005396715,0.032334592],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802774,0.0011892499,0.000054984223,0.00010940426,0.0002473449,0.00037129276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959347,0.0021592048,0.00040164613,0.00010631333,0.00068405364,0.00071400555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033606517,0.00033747024,0.00024835297,0.00074629777,0.013971645,0.00562054,0.0023231537,0.007896219,0.0026970778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010254495,0.00031614382,0.00042294047,0.0007549051,0.011196889,0.0028804536,0.002160142,0.009047424,0.0004050317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009149808,0.0003391962,0.038430873,0.00023720419,0.000037442813,0.00830445,0.6201956,0.0002013892,0.0008474816,0.08549254,0.17725168,0.06857063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016641177,0.00010956919,0.02306475,0.0006465464,0.000018523564,0.002314792,0.79699844,0.0002506177,0.00025710763,0.011433754,0.16482332,0.00006597072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11881986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32534322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88118017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038217886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071820314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23625648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399060906","doi":"10.29173/mlj968","title":"The Child and Family Services Authorities Act","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.009447094187823668,"score_gpt":0.24311224345599544,"score_spread":0.23366514926817178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399060906","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009123062,0.003216958,0.0012608202,0.060985405,0.0019623907,0.0007659896,0.0060626385,0.00028700678,0.9163357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047094993,0.0042867116,0.0037301593,0.05590885,0.000332235,0.0011521409,0.0043806853,0.000099599376,0.8830146],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99396896,0.00090254727,0.0002740084,0.00029147466,0.003202872,0.0013601552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935213,0.00091554,0.00038349666,0.00048241284,0.0033031467,0.0013942481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038813355,0.0007170198,0.00055393955,0.0013142482,0.007845037,0.003930061,0.0018179639,0.0059302347,0.030678948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011330471,0.00067276566,0.00047608232,0.0020160289,0.0024155397,0.001352756,0.0030978953,0.0050808224,0.01417122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044038272,0.000081239996,0.0041957684,0.00010295645,0.000012720208,0.00039760003,0.003278209,0.00012356258,0.00047460027,0.19922441,0.767938,0.024126835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018166505,0.000019294652,0.011167981,0.00021091964,0.000010867794,0.000098000346,0.0007011866,0.000051311523,0.00013064314,0.0018243245,0.9857458,0.000021465845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6367999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81697375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36320013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014197964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09687256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7306782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399286260","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4802382","title":"Judicial Review in the Federal Courts: The Emergencies Act","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Judicial review; Political science","score_opus":0.017626122926745418,"score_gpt":0.3255535371480049,"score_spread":0.30792741422125947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399286260","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17602953,0.017111942,0.0085009355,0.5471648,0.0023366362,0.00034836686,0.00058182667,0.00011420042,0.24781166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92185605,0.003101711,0.0020367936,0.04766706,0.002205399,0.00014707154,0.00008038515,0.000036445275,0.022869084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95214796,0.02560484,0.0021887226,0.003607458,0.007689029,0.00876204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8734035,0.100036755,0.009521309,0.0036320384,0.0087953815,0.004611156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039798424,0.0004157091,0.0010436146,0.0017910199,0.0108243795,0.013630333,0.0023895248,0.028276518,0.0046217525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13358825,0.0007493207,0.00090772397,0.0021766247,0.008612908,0.0054671196,0.004224916,0.015190382,0.0007755813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000159044,0.00016389927,0.0065764603,0.00009456389,0.000054909124,0.00075770397,0.0041739326,0.002058622,0.00053129805,0.8932714,0.072194465,0.019963684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034821857,0.000389315,0.07020065,0.0012739687,0.00027088454,0.0008846613,0.009014286,0.009765424,0.0022007998,0.50594246,0.39928916,0.00042010573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09345482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16451645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09345482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013913052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045743115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2104767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399539461","doi":"10.1163/2211-4394_ilwo_sim_032310","title":"III.W.8 DECLARATION OF MONTREAL ON LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, AND TRANSGENDER HUMAN RIGHTS","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transgender; Lesbian; Declaration; Human rights; Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09430577812742362,"score_gpt":0.37785703520284136,"score_spread":0.28355125707541773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399539461","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004253309,0.000018423092,0.000030270381,0.000098923425,0.000022543229,0.000011078143,0.9991634,0.00006820085,0.0005446017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00034651122,0.000052082865,0.0002480835,0.00013176167,0.000013100932,0.0001877321,0.99668795,0.00006642525,0.0022664375],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745756,0.00052754977,0.00031207353,0.00038127828,0.00077092566,0.00055066944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98938996,0.0031146696,0.0010489388,0.0018253865,0.0036730801,0.00094810105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036354167,0.0019364615,0.0014504652,0.005547591,0.0015036415,0.0052017304,0.0038622662,0.0032170776,0.11409336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02240328,0.0012598508,0.0020695077,0.008132148,0.00073715387,0.0018198037,0.0029120941,0.003376946,0.11071951],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028637072,0.000013770928,0.00095182564,0.00021824897,0.00001438568,0.000006701239,0.000016027949,0.00011255319,0.000011303634,0.0005333395,0.99704933,0.0010437965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035370138,0.00001778245,0.009236519,0.0008890267,0.000038906797,0.000031152103,0.00015990245,0.00042052296,0.00015937204,0.0018030376,0.9868514,0.00003865184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.173597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23516135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.826403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038098078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010666481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3816803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400073972","doi":"10.1515/9781773855714-101","title":"B Canadian Bill of Rights, 1960","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bill of rights; Political science; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.01954354620257779,"score_gpt":0.21180065942806003,"score_spread":0.19225711322548225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400073972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013007383,0.012067656,0.0002763353,0.016483413,0.0022331001,0.00013417371,0.0024098465,0.000078401026,0.9650163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012404091,0.00312235,0.0004843456,0.008793892,0.00034292144,0.000108234555,0.00041254977,0.000058215915,0.9742734],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976186,0.00019373506,0.000106308806,0.00037005325,0.0009117427,0.0007995075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882704,0.00021253143,0.000040048006,0.000109031214,0.0006581415,0.0001533014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001378484,0.0014698193,0.00072841306,0.00414852,0.014411457,0.008610487,0.0015348295,0.013419054,0.06758611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004818692,0.0013360998,0.0008124068,0.0046569244,0.00397725,0.0034681666,0.0019147842,0.012182766,0.011461836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017779632,0.000027173573,0.00012910746,0.000042180276,0.00000362192,0.00006180051,0.0004036229,0.00009151144,0.000041117557,0.33146495,0.65673673,0.010980327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001097117,0.0000037959778,0.00062412577,0.00007961539,0.000003796981,0.000023901865,0.00013262646,0.00003752063,0.00003980388,0.014465996,0.98456395,0.000013818834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91033036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9547401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089669645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05518501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.065390475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40039712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400074275","doi":"10.1515/9781773855714-054","title":"6.5 Interventions at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03189424598827061,"score_gpt":0.23549413609159825,"score_spread":0.20359989010332763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400074275","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012628785,0.0068342057,0.0009970674,0.03640595,0.0009199099,0.00009253287,0.00038432202,0.000061895356,0.94167536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32671228,0.0036181184,0.0014672711,0.028739456,0.00030603269,0.000115960785,0.00021680837,0.000075740885,0.6387483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955356,0.00047028164,0.000061038074,0.0003501749,0.0013754665,0.002207522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984097,0.0002801845,0.00004666696,0.000064768545,0.0009075269,0.0002911719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016876608,0.00052897807,0.00034428865,0.0013992378,0.020745274,0.006451632,0.0018157527,0.007649786,0.023196634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051498665,0.00036370533,0.00056750985,0.0014023621,0.0040719337,0.001454461,0.0019618259,0.005937908,0.0018678886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022273574,0.000028661216,0.0012622217,0.000053681444,0.0000148092395,0.00022057739,0.0021405534,0.00048232367,0.00022777796,0.75856555,0.21763888,0.019342652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002850279,0.000022606793,0.0072962483,0.00032715514,0.000046493842,0.00007269362,0.002624601,0.0010187662,0.0005068784,0.05197787,0.9360255,0.000052581723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96310985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98924166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06405453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06405453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.118966125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4647503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400728857","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4894400","title":"The Section 33 Democratic Accountability Concept: Proposing a Two-Pronged Approach for Judicial Review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Section (typography); Democracy; Political science; Law and economics; Judicial review; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.018247873274078154,"score_gpt":0.3373300424225857,"score_spread":0.3190821691485075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400728857","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010633536,0.0014714458,0.5259355,0.17294411,0.0034744542,0.0007951417,0.00024960472,0.00047083816,0.28402537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.665281,0.000804328,0.20120062,0.049957003,0.0054674693,0.0029934384,0.00010419489,0.00020836244,0.07398352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94444495,0.026154175,0.0025515163,0.005651894,0.016993733,0.0042037577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9646876,0.020251058,0.0032582632,0.0034960646,0.006975169,0.0013317689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03741128,0.001013757,0.0011579776,0.0044785137,0.0062194117,0.012545669,0.0030914461,0.017302373,0.005424921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056344714,0.0010592913,0.0018235502,0.0020061487,0.02222391,0.010847128,0.005086022,0.013785935,0.0018691665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004146051,0.000008044899,0.00006260993,0.000012627372,0.000003744413,0.000016856986,0.00017674979,0.00014820059,0.000043664364,0.9941619,0.0028549025,0.0025066063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026806032,0.000023007093,0.00020839114,0.00006544112,0.000015297335,0.000070593516,0.00007074502,0.0019117485,0.00025213862,0.9761204,0.021204174,0.00003119933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044418843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064840443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03741128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0078916075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021398084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19785213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401019393","doi":"10.29173/alr2780","title":"A Missed Opportunity: How the British Columbia Court of Appeal Could Have Helped Reform Sentencing in the Opioid Crisis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Political science; Law; Opioid; Law and economics; Economics; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.046372373735564416,"score_gpt":0.3080086319918639,"score_spread":0.2616362582562995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401019393","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023269944,0.004431723,0.00076903217,0.90735346,0.00548578,0.00010967297,0.0001950493,0.00007740986,0.05830785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41029182,0.004781868,0.0029284211,0.4581038,0.0025497265,0.00017884841,0.00019556934,0.00018199104,0.12078792],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98036146,0.005054424,0.00062298623,0.0010387907,0.003907094,0.009015101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95990455,0.012255694,0.00080334494,0.00095870264,0.014611099,0.011466682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021879226,0.0005323681,0.00073109043,0.002455122,0.03205666,0.021854397,0.0043351576,0.02937499,0.015808402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06288154,0.00090618106,0.00077146816,0.0017714073,0.014335796,0.005916858,0.005569281,0.029117564,0.0011986494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020335813,0.00018243898,0.006796328,0.00026201826,0.0000987783,0.0014987419,0.008543106,0.0021153546,0.0007844601,0.19235934,0.71753323,0.06962281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002807548,0.00014297766,0.03040785,0.001536909,0.00028409078,0.00026950813,0.034695074,0.0022306507,0.0010515907,0.045260835,0.8832237,0.0006160554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95067024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9868472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08397948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08397948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28639942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6093166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401062482","doi":"10.3138/9781552217030","title":"Essentials of Canadian Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.032678036681687256,"score_gpt":0.2412579582638367,"score_spread":0.20857992158214944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401062482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044812862,0.007038831,0.00070860004,0.020447774,0.0016705411,0.0000511788,0.0004465853,0.000070748145,0.9691177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03733408,0.010753393,0.003059335,0.009151637,0.000711712,0.00012147616,0.0003974823,0.00013450583,0.93833625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957557,0.00033789544,0.000091638154,0.00032680406,0.0027437073,0.0007443387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978435,0.00028723516,0.00004391861,0.00016252173,0.0014043325,0.00025845482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019095616,0.0008681791,0.0004961958,0.0038485606,0.01686232,0.010246314,0.0019791233,0.004028665,0.045964662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005527356,0.00057205104,0.00048445453,0.003979831,0.01124533,0.0036842613,0.0023855667,0.0044602505,0.0067748735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027434744,0.0000034154423,0.00008072218,0.000036696045,0.0000010244373,0.00004706189,0.0009215458,0.00006650076,0.0000350414,0.7234815,0.2610185,0.01430516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001421178,0.0000011247571,0.0002993754,0.000098768636,0.0000016192146,0.000035492983,0.0003837178,0.00007264035,0.000021298034,0.02967456,0.9694008,0.000009186379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9571585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9752172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.908103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09189699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12307035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6667625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401415475","doi":"10.32721/ctj.2024.72.2.pf.chan","title":"Policy Forum: The Registered Charity Appeals Process—More Reasons (and a Few Proposals) for Reform","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02790370333020237,"score_gpt":0.30493930471502184,"score_spread":0.2770356013848195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401415475","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00344062,0.0024927605,0.004028258,0.93956655,0.0036232565,0.00029112253,0.0001707173,0.00015371233,0.046233077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1831025,0.0050427523,0.019182587,0.6157836,0.0066014547,0.0005900839,0.0003616959,0.0002673941,0.16906798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93502027,0.016341679,0.0019010149,0.006799997,0.021568488,0.018368652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9155407,0.025762156,0.0038851516,0.005784665,0.031728037,0.017299209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055406455,0.00065259694,0.00085023633,0.0027034136,0.027436318,0.040036958,0.007266516,0.03663149,0.018873554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08780451,0.00089341286,0.0018806725,0.0033153063,0.026839482,0.01565452,0.0057886075,0.027913818,0.0034975687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028292729,0.00013456756,0.00061736,0.00013275625,0.000014192301,0.00013103976,0.002418215,0.0005236966,0.00037501566,0.7545995,0.22053288,0.020492435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012284314,0.000059712384,0.0027678548,0.0005221861,0.000036152964,0.000085171734,0.0050762645,0.0013726176,0.0005095913,0.0709175,0.9183863,0.00014380855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80521905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8024848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19478095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13824634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.356109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401505106","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4906764","title":"\"Zapata Drift\": A Proposal For Improving Trust In The Special Litigation Committee Process&amp;nbsp;","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Business; Political science; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.0182984586858127,"score_gpt":0.31565837808227065,"score_spread":0.29735991939645795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401505106","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04004948,0.0008757199,0.27748805,0.5393339,0.0044233045,0.0022560337,0.0007874484,0.003078625,0.13170744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74937487,0.00044605523,0.11793877,0.06353955,0.0034251404,0.0029941406,0.00026094457,0.00048455925,0.06153596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9361331,0.026057376,0.0024986994,0.009556827,0.017293416,0.008460597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8873699,0.045271374,0.014168227,0.021132702,0.021646066,0.0104117505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.067126855,0.0011630905,0.001782222,0.004258178,0.010708599,0.018579898,0.009431103,0.026793424,0.025098993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23989083,0.0013277403,0.0026534721,0.003764362,0.018197004,0.031068811,0.015496357,0.018065693,0.003907402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013449122,0.0001516957,0.0024456251,0.00014835659,0.00005678372,0.000111715024,0.0022795547,0.0018979458,0.00023248416,0.89869374,0.06575823,0.028089318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067442475,0.00031457032,0.006066695,0.0003904654,0.00023586216,0.00016551449,0.0026463105,0.0128777735,0.0015074974,0.8280064,0.14686006,0.0002543458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018344771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019106388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067126855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01358102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056090523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35500497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401546860","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-64583-9_16","title":"The Family Law Culture War","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thornhill Medical (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.021753621460370354,"score_gpt":0.2822358485820993,"score_spread":0.26048222712172897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401546860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065761767,0.010694557,0.00047476494,0.05335645,0.00154586,0.000020038871,0.00004655722,0.000014918333,0.9272707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21078548,0.005415971,0.00025026497,0.029807033,0.00075138116,0.00008470582,0.00003306531,0.00006165083,0.7528104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990165,0.00043884487,0.000011732236,0.00010311552,0.00016306993,0.0002666761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994448,0.00024346114,0.000030402487,0.000043540414,0.0000702506,0.00016755657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013249562,0.00044080982,0.00032112596,0.00072755973,0.010518142,0.0054240306,0.0007203848,0.0043453206,0.02987898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032929122,0.00023375172,0.00021030317,0.0008288058,0.01194856,0.0049554454,0.002571165,0.007234099,0.0028947857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072984017,0.000021050922,0.00015404497,0.000009993548,0.0000021866178,0.00010086497,0.006037587,0.000028814278,0.000032764052,0.8655088,0.11394167,0.014154942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007879166,0.00001222151,0.00086653524,0.00018923909,0.0000030952754,0.000111634996,0.010121056,0.0000656996,0.00010457944,0.12478427,0.8637253,0.000008491475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072977364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13380113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072977364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008559553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00728838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14510518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401809787","doi":"10.55016/ojs/sppp.v4i1.42359","title":"Rhetoric and Realities: What Independence of the Bar Requires of Lawyer Regulation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The School of Public Policy Publications","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Independence (probability theory); Bar (unit); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Physics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0801145769826002,"score_gpt":0.32757747224976025,"score_spread":0.24746289526716003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401809787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0538435,0.0055367425,0.022795428,0.34382138,0.0013020835,0.00007975802,0.00006802685,0.00008957674,0.5724635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94950897,0.0016833286,0.0034830335,0.02601702,0.00070046954,0.000083998995,0.000032554934,0.00007452041,0.018416155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97010607,0.01192352,0.00088594086,0.003087754,0.009892578,0.004104174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9632046,0.024454532,0.0024284648,0.0020060446,0.0067052003,0.0012010589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022112072,0.00041888215,0.0007767214,0.0027104395,0.017762495,0.022546917,0.003352201,0.011965912,0.0033471675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047521394,0.00082669273,0.0008537471,0.0020892452,0.08194561,0.014295029,0.005541694,0.014286787,0.0007756903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007157967,0.0000064854353,0.00024431248,0.0000320994,0.0000031648628,0.00004627743,0.014489316,0.00006423545,0.00010408194,0.9812494,0.0014117119,0.0023418046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000438936,0.000049228678,0.0054841265,0.0009506935,0.00006989451,0.00021487116,0.03999753,0.0012396367,0.0010089694,0.70229536,0.24852447,0.000121300836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28539315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20061292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28539315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044478618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04098111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.567464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401809813","doi":"10.55016/ojs/sppp.v16i1.77468","title":"A Made-in-Alberta Failure: Unfunded Oil and Gas Closure Liability","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The School of Public Policy Publications","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Closure (psychology); Liability; Environmental science; Fossil fuel; Petroleum engineering; Forensic engineering; Business; Engineering; Political science; Waste management; Accounting; Law","score_opus":0.03861231564212739,"score_gpt":0.3315484264540059,"score_spread":0.29293611081187854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401809813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102355145,0.0043888004,0.014064044,0.3829142,0.0033026151,0.00014621802,0.0005623512,0.0009626389,0.491304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66367525,0.0023931595,0.00774696,0.09099633,0.0005844489,0.00005313382,0.00038049463,0.0003013262,0.2338689],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855881,0.00106213,0.00025718604,0.0011103338,0.008812849,0.0031693624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864405,0.0028055052,0.0006185694,0.0010711309,0.006561065,0.0025032135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009746596,0.00048740135,0.00047108476,0.0014490023,0.015543531,0.011349091,0.004451713,0.009049212,0.007042666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016522288,0.0007276762,0.0007356702,0.0012344439,0.01112098,0.0038213746,0.00396307,0.012113532,0.0011793155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011358492,0.000097023316,0.012461532,0.00011682081,0.00004266842,0.0021178394,0.004801285,0.0024483972,0.0015972058,0.65739363,0.25078988,0.06802023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006182879,0.00012399124,0.021325318,0.0006006951,0.00008322862,0.0008586726,0.007959973,0.0053074537,0.0028505027,0.08004354,0.8804656,0.00031928593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8828217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9228722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11717832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0421995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12048323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30618024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402255527","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4913155","title":"8/1/24 Draft Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(F): Reflections After a Quarter Century","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Hull; Political science; History; Engineering; Archaeology; Marine engineering","score_opus":0.008764104651959955,"score_gpt":0.2913313792665106,"score_spread":0.2825672746145506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402255527","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013938777,0.01370968,0.0045146267,0.30158386,0.04020815,0.0008364937,0.0034230168,0.00057690905,0.62120837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08724404,0.0023935647,0.004590828,0.36657017,0.010433495,0.0011679986,0.00050699484,0.0006719644,0.5264209],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97712713,0.0031137427,0.0014519778,0.004010465,0.0075001246,0.006796592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99000657,0.0033984752,0.00039940217,0.0013072154,0.0041162972,0.0007719687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019910095,0.0015857454,0.0021137623,0.0034570817,0.014533919,0.021090806,0.0052127717,0.08393034,0.024625013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045088865,0.0019752034,0.0037811534,0.0022329257,0.0120036965,0.0093035055,0.006042743,0.056515783,0.012822221],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001767224,0.0002148103,0.00039127623,0.00016981052,0.00003936837,0.00030641488,0.0018169669,0.00021298512,0.00064925826,0.55785114,0.4264062,0.011764978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025880133,0.00014694226,0.0050425758,0.0010789077,0.0001615525,0.00018142923,0.0014708703,0.00048984215,0.0027967903,0.096792474,0.8912433,0.00033647032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21610011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19353557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21610011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023052767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018640371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42968452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402389718","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4952542","title":"Policy Forum: The Registered Charity Appeals Process—More Reasons (and&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;Few Proposals) for Reform","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Political science; Public administration; Public relations; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.034408246701807185,"score_gpt":0.37391599478545623,"score_spread":0.33950774808364903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402389718","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022794048,0.0009334438,0.0017770603,0.94294727,0.013443917,0.00032196805,0.00050186657,0.00028488605,0.037510227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024426308,0.000401153,0.0031449753,0.8440489,0.014836626,0.00077202386,0.0002597801,0.00021550909,0.11189463],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93170005,0.019549979,0.003248708,0.00876001,0.017535126,0.01920621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8371113,0.10079372,0.0065172436,0.010241165,0.022161564,0.02317495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07988044,0.0017043062,0.002147127,0.0030291623,0.021769095,0.033522647,0.010386829,0.21296832,0.10521871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1578623,0.0021980486,0.0044440804,0.0026540428,0.011776028,0.0304115,0.010804073,0.06470146,0.03454082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001718968,0.00043723965,0.00046785033,0.00016353432,0.000026843905,0.00022339812,0.00064476335,0.0002514798,0.00073327,0.1953741,0.7903014,0.011204228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085698365,0.0002404817,0.0037414806,0.0007081459,0.000116614196,0.00014650598,0.0014423331,0.001835361,0.0014561554,0.0872272,0.9018995,0.00032918295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037509378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03886967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21296832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023784524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0767658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42245317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402457743","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4952574","title":"State of New Jersey v. Darryl Nieves, Proposed Amicus Curiae Brief of False-Confession","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ontario Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Span (engineering); Confession (law); Life span; Theology; Physics; Art; Engineering; Structural engineering; Philosophy; Political science; Gerontology; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.012071612088610134,"score_gpt":0.29208686286281643,"score_spread":0.2800152507742063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402457743","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016378904,0.006617351,0.002607443,0.60610193,0.0069297766,0.00014656443,0.0011974631,0.00019756229,0.35982314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23944513,0.0031622932,0.0023389144,0.5364668,0.0025222402,0.00034328838,0.000532251,0.00010337205,0.21508573],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943522,0.0012312292,0.00032207667,0.0006048067,0.0023185473,0.0011711086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98987937,0.007119515,0.00030842453,0.0003330977,0.0019155547,0.00044406398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067037432,0.00054107036,0.00060590566,0.0011984908,0.011996838,0.006597877,0.0028539656,0.022129929,0.006609313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021913804,0.0008088983,0.00064859324,0.0011172333,0.0030321332,0.00432384,0.0021044821,0.017603055,0.0014890189],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041905572,0.00002408099,0.001196873,0.00006700484,0.000017011223,0.0005415604,0.0018327271,0.00011577719,0.00035377784,0.34726104,0.64054453,0.008003637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009464518,0.000055820263,0.0054857507,0.00051776995,0.00012854631,0.0003387939,0.0022674554,0.001003162,0.001305657,0.06414295,0.9245221,0.00013729694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2319339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5380902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2319339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009285083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021743236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46116775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403130753","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4976260","title":"Considerations for a Tort of Family Violence","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Law; Liability","score_opus":0.033048398360761365,"score_gpt":0.3360525044494344,"score_spread":0.30300410608867306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403130753","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03829614,0.005439367,0.015632173,0.56449795,0.00379506,0.00023780654,0.0002883008,0.0001504208,0.3716628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7773302,0.0030045926,0.008981013,0.13875441,0.009827423,0.0005691425,0.00015888033,0.00018826833,0.06118608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97584116,0.010070533,0.0012169678,0.002876068,0.0044305827,0.0055646994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96591413,0.024287382,0.0015080622,0.0018412353,0.0031481488,0.0033009187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022127913,0.0011709053,0.0021916232,0.0029762832,0.025171721,0.019958537,0.0066831266,0.09852301,0.017668638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06948723,0.0014396583,0.0029234136,0.0018814488,0.018928617,0.013077922,0.006951471,0.038802017,0.001979662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006332494,0.000057908688,0.00064842816,0.000043390057,0.00004116131,0.0014096628,0.0015731961,0.00078830955,0.00016254839,0.9677317,0.023631973,0.0038484747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108275046,0.0001278637,0.0022937935,0.0006557222,0.0001546524,0.0021270053,0.0058953827,0.0021482217,0.00033072307,0.8604315,0.12556021,0.00016664044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027971294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050872706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09852301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009665787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015921514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11702496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403538754","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4991119","title":"&lt;span&gt;Unreasonable Steps: Trying to Make Sense of R. v. Morrison&lt;/span&gt;","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Span (engineering); Life span; Engineering; Gerontology; Medicine; Structural engineering","score_opus":0.012523327030917636,"score_gpt":0.28592383506352587,"score_spread":0.27340050803260824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403538754","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059642266,0.015076367,0.015051525,0.5030484,0.0022696212,0.000083228086,0.00037809904,0.0004889765,0.45763946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4988463,0.008958144,0.020693226,0.2216903,0.0024450473,0.00038778683,0.00017890778,0.0007097316,0.24609053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976622,0.0010896968,0.00016221861,0.00031337145,0.00052836287,0.00024408607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99579275,0.0024795488,0.00042664644,0.00028972598,0.0006992469,0.0003121138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044184956,0.0006617999,0.00035467345,0.0011909464,0.0043980223,0.005020807,0.0014209821,0.012302906,0.025588375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017218206,0.00037993307,0.000359726,0.00088825636,0.008691933,0.007918334,0.0021520732,0.007261193,0.0034982269],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019380543,0.000011750567,0.00041028293,0.000057674562,0.0000062177483,0.00019762044,0.0012663024,0.00029384095,0.00015075492,0.66542816,0.30968958,0.02246855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026631895,0.000022683911,0.0013652232,0.0003892443,0.000014337567,0.00019993859,0.0023600957,0.001774451,0.0005499798,0.6565824,0.3366703,0.00004474151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036717333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06823954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036717333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055055763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003994484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08560163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403705975","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4938628","title":"Notwithstanding Judicial Review: Legal and Political Reasons Why Courts Should Not Review Laws Invoking Section 33","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Section (typography); Political science; Politics; Judicial review; Business","score_opus":0.028625565527659606,"score_gpt":0.33999120278914496,"score_spread":0.31136563726148536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403705975","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10719725,0.002946564,0.010392916,0.61028504,0.0018450947,0.00020068818,0.0003336488,0.00038693586,0.26641187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7516214,0.00058690965,0.0044746306,0.21908839,0.0018211046,0.00017210854,0.00007417079,0.00015691492,0.022004204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9630811,0.007574962,0.0019595898,0.0055672447,0.012940263,0.008876799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8430199,0.110575385,0.010809259,0.009623063,0.021245716,0.004726667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045262747,0.00026970584,0.00072035694,0.0013285404,0.0071067642,0.007453109,0.0023450234,0.032733124,0.0076216464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17535752,0.0008265525,0.00081115105,0.0014805271,0.011013373,0.0051388848,0.0025154874,0.020611322,0.0021354153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076765915,0.00008573875,0.007215942,0.00009781891,0.00005475747,0.0005516995,0.0032580614,0.00030402694,0.001500015,0.8227649,0.14981945,0.0142708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029214448,0.00018547373,0.03411495,0.0006967106,0.0002316351,0.00095044856,0.0034215038,0.0030073752,0.0044339076,0.6483819,0.30403423,0.00024957935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026063288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04196289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045262747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004270807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020737037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23937511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403730665","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4997421","title":"From Margarine to Cannabis: The Ongoing Evolution of the Criminal Law Power","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Cannabis; Power (physics); Law; Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Psychiatry; Physics","score_opus":0.009606674304234659,"score_gpt":0.2782675502228506,"score_spread":0.2686608759186159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403730665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6552513,0.008218449,0.0030353158,0.09355134,0.00023765904,0.000038055554,0.00017000444,0.000034896606,0.23946299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890211,0.0013326964,0.0003746695,0.0020875316,0.00007778151,0.0000053412705,0.000017649601,0.000033060696,0.0070500844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732697,0.0009752457,0.00008077784,0.00062442425,0.0005554828,0.0004372043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942952,0.0030277402,0.0005794613,0.00062581047,0.00080740504,0.0006643629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032919091,0.00015674243,0.00039016397,0.001544077,0.0039745816,0.006054144,0.0011653412,0.0030509196,0.010008939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013241625,0.00028465607,0.00022001883,0.0015342947,0.020953037,0.004612881,0.0038746954,0.0032414924,0.0005263366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014039862,0.00007062568,0.006842287,0.00010626323,0.000026318805,0.0005750922,0.032457232,0.00037731728,0.0019817469,0.8861531,0.004228132,0.06704141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004133207,0.00014931138,0.06833618,0.0005833536,0.000035565463,0.0007723829,0.032042272,0.0012239302,0.00269034,0.44128436,0.45271328,0.0001276921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049858812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06724061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049858812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007285307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005030127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09913719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403911139","doi":"10.12927/hcq.2024.27429","title":"The First Nations Health Authority’s Self-Assessment Aligning With the British Columbia Cultural Safety and Humility Standard","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Healthcare Quarterly","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Island Health","funders":"","keywords":"Cultural humility; Humility; Health authority; Political science; Public relations; Psychology; Public administration; Nursing; Medicine; Cultural competence; Law","score_opus":0.012452676228092706,"score_gpt":0.3253302581487766,"score_spread":0.3128775819206839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403911139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1660794,0.0044891275,0.0514224,0.07692166,0.0035708451,0.008428279,0.005848137,0.0013509827,0.6818891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69232523,0.0024136538,0.157319,0.0061273053,0.00016858972,0.0059991386,0.0053197094,0.00038306066,0.1299444],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97867113,0.006419793,0.0012152091,0.00033981324,0.012296005,0.001058073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9497985,0.00500489,0.0012194215,0.0021735276,0.03753831,0.004265322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025751168,0.00026827352,0.00033067688,0.0023835895,0.0032103811,0.0026334606,0.0013641702,0.0008903315,0.0027242312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039776042,0.00026839608,0.0003966529,0.001856147,0.0019437836,0.001145383,0.002528208,0.0029868917,0.0010768187],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013593174,0.00041962424,0.1286172,0.00032532105,0.000029118473,0.00016267673,0.013483598,0.000902534,0.0013869983,0.033561535,0.322849,0.4981264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056981782,0.00030195175,0.40686533,0.0014193832,0.000025873022,0.00021271207,0.015837599,0.002628044,0.0021900595,0.007690733,0.56263876,0.00013260506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5812694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7349861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41873062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012737511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08547174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8423932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403962834","doi":"10.59962/9780774820110-023","title":"Appendix A Canadian Legal and Institutional Context","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.020926923873944233,"score_gpt":0.19079336245946868,"score_spread":0.16986643858552444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403962834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028842697,0.0015405797,0.00063281757,0.0041457084,0.0009301346,0.00060674344,0.2544477,0.00028758385,0.7345243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04286001,0.0031186298,0.0034346012,0.0025821356,0.00028086276,0.0008535109,0.08778394,0.0003159322,0.85877043],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984836,0.00009778412,0.000060565122,0.00016502322,0.00079498533,0.00039804613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99103886,0.0009169588,0.00015782144,0.00023578652,0.006823477,0.00082709244],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008967475,0.00077655865,0.0007621232,0.009159348,0.008675645,0.0049339635,0.0016815724,0.0015409346,0.41315752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007805912,0.00059530634,0.00046838564,0.017391473,0.00094584835,0.0015913175,0.001000551,0.0022999493,0.04144577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001541361,0.000016673383,0.00058637524,0.00010676304,0.0000023085106,0.00006815906,0.00023044438,0.00015453357,0.000023644177,0.021527238,0.9690185,0.008249985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011836431,0.0000024991746,0.004337675,0.000110054396,0.000004640056,0.00002897818,0.0005656982,0.000078473335,0.000045667184,0.0017828812,0.9930118,0.000019861707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98639756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99193925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41315752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07169868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09902503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83705956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404469148","doi":"10.29173/alr2786","title":"The Regulatory Offence Revolution in Criminal Justice: The Expansive Role of Regulatory Offences","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expansive; Criminology; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Business; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.018555105770264178,"score_gpt":0.30972136901186803,"score_spread":0.29116626324160383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404469148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03464726,0.2321953,0.016765963,0.30090743,0.0029755929,0.00007771082,0.00004870027,0.000078309786,0.41230372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8059938,0.07369852,0.0051963334,0.08876603,0.00581244,0.00012868864,0.000033355343,0.000091400056,0.020279342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97335243,0.015092701,0.00074233377,0.0017542426,0.006905156,0.002153197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9547669,0.03729488,0.0021420205,0.0018827996,0.0030505995,0.0008627092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020516532,0.00032822328,0.000643077,0.0031834792,0.0055540083,0.011882411,0.0015618228,0.007823355,0.0026224162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033260584,0.00046400842,0.0006337201,0.0021692726,0.041915163,0.009254747,0.0042176563,0.010333476,0.0003887954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073396436,0.000011195933,0.00045722333,0.00008970745,0.00000754805,0.00009108347,0.0009608536,0.00024449726,0.00009006543,0.9725811,0.0068472736,0.018612014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003159567,0.00007304794,0.00572963,0.0015297973,0.000028633931,0.00033369692,0.0028106077,0.00059405394,0.00027315796,0.6205917,0.36794358,0.0000605046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013222356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024508497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020516532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073938924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010310665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1085031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404694558","doi":"10.1163/9789004322714_cclc_2023-0021-0156","title":"Public Interest Groups at Supreme Court of Canada to Defend Federal Environmental Law from Alberta Challenge","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Climate Change and Law Collection","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Public interest; Environmental law; Federal court","score_opus":0.07391896990976994,"score_gpt":0.2655424566525352,"score_spread":0.19162348674276525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404694558","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012951626,0.00016415642,0.00006277602,0.00067441433,0.00004917193,0.000026619779,0.9927067,0.00016344035,0.004857578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0057007824,0.00021146137,0.00043259322,0.00041959493,0.000032120523,0.00013754859,0.97896284,0.00010092593,0.014002086],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977094,0.00019220694,0.00010626304,0.0002544464,0.0010052108,0.00073249434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851167,0.003169279,0.0008642845,0.0015869625,0.0073269703,0.0019356644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028186738,0.0012135741,0.0011233601,0.0066950577,0.0039973953,0.0053686607,0.0039560557,0.0027147287,0.04626348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015148104,0.00093452935,0.0010873538,0.011535667,0.00091656955,0.0011036205,0.0022771528,0.0034080304,0.020733299],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036510417,0.000019409556,0.0033168558,0.000085138585,0.00001408937,0.000019404857,0.000055637505,0.0002092186,0.000011138203,0.001056268,0.99334735,0.0018289365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020823283,0.000011929801,0.04408795,0.00046870104,0.00005983828,0.000033203632,0.00054161745,0.001220953,0.0002627058,0.0019036881,0.9511546,0.000046632245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95722276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.980331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04626348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02143735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05282648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15553957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404694703","doi":"10.1163/9789004322714_cclc_2023-0027-0210","title":"Public Interest Groups at Supreme Court of Canada to Defend Federal Environmental Law from Alberta Challenge","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Climate Change and Law Collection","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Public interest; Environmental law","score_opus":0.07391896990976994,"score_gpt":0.2655424566525352,"score_spread":0.19162348674276525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404694703","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012951626,0.00016415642,0.00006277602,0.00067441433,0.00004917193,0.000026619779,0.9927067,0.00016344035,0.004857578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0057007824,0.00021146137,0.00043259322,0.00041959493,0.000032120523,0.00013754859,0.97896284,0.00010092593,0.014002086],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977094,0.00019220694,0.00010626304,0.0002544464,0.0010052108,0.00073249434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851167,0.003169279,0.0008642845,0.0015869625,0.0073269703,0.0019356644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028186738,0.0012135741,0.0011233601,0.0066950577,0.0039973953,0.0053686607,0.0039560557,0.0027147287,0.04626348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015148104,0.00093452935,0.0010873538,0.011535667,0.00091656955,0.0011036205,0.0022771528,0.0034080304,0.020733299],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036510417,0.000019409556,0.0033168558,0.000085138585,0.00001408937,0.000019404857,0.000055637505,0.0002092186,0.000011138203,0.001056268,0.99334735,0.0018289365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020823283,0.000011929801,0.04408795,0.00046870104,0.00005983828,0.000033203632,0.00054161745,0.001220953,0.0002627058,0.0019036881,0.9511546,0.000046632245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95722276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.980331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04626348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02143735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05282648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15553957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404737995","doi":"10.22215/cjcr.v11i1.5060","title":"Indian Residential Schools and s. 43 of the Criminal Code (Canada’s corporal punishment law, TRC Call to Action #6)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Children s Rights / Revue canadienne des droits des enfants","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporal punishment; Law; Criminal code; Punishment (psychology); Political science; Criminology; Action (physics); Criminal law; Sociology; Psychology; Physics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01735756233517956,"score_gpt":0.2551598936934323,"score_spread":0.2378023313582527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404737995","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030263575,0.004016389,0.0013879437,0.20375675,0.0109817535,0.0010100144,0.0038950522,0.0009557651,0.7437327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.057032175,0.0008139877,0.0013509558,0.17219678,0.00091080397,0.00050954695,0.00041551335,0.000213781,0.76655644],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99435586,0.0004415375,0.00030766486,0.0005775879,0.0015466461,0.0027706178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99496776,0.0011085749,0.00030814297,0.00027486033,0.0018613036,0.0014793231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003332796,0.00086076325,0.0010442367,0.0014470484,0.02829018,0.007851352,0.0035583915,0.030486805,0.04379651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009168366,0.0015210515,0.0017579643,0.0012653858,0.0036798355,0.0020436165,0.0039598113,0.025266841,0.009610224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004954366,0.00019408952,0.0038792833,0.00014254625,0.000018328725,0.00064147013,0.0041424045,0.00019396555,0.0006974869,0.0924458,0.88201785,0.015577212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044244618,0.00006864292,0.031296834,0.00036064943,0.000066549335,0.00020602609,0.0046123103,0.0003047747,0.00091114704,0.0043966672,0.95755875,0.00017338137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88919294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96804184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11080706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023216965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09997676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22291923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404991610","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5034921","title":"Race, Unconscionability, and Contractual Equality&lt;br&gt;","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Race (biology); Sociology; Law and economics; Gender studies","score_opus":0.012699163827818917,"score_gpt":0.30607450956005083,"score_spread":0.2933753457322319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404991610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3885524,0.0034034487,0.008606198,0.042538814,0.0002150811,0.00006583135,0.000311959,0.000019661775,0.5562866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880752,0.00031727593,0.00033127487,0.00063996,0.000064877706,0.000038381255,0.000017758868,0.000005564469,0.010509692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967103,0.0014436591,0.000112374335,0.00033687783,0.0004732346,0.0009235242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99075085,0.006443625,0.0010289388,0.00047048132,0.00057814945,0.0007280195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005016459,0.00016001244,0.00058017275,0.0009254797,0.0055540027,0.0056226463,0.0010258665,0.0034891942,0.02983558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01834005,0.00018459438,0.0003030497,0.0011634518,0.012452802,0.0064675296,0.0028976668,0.003087036,0.00087938295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037954396,0.000049310707,0.0023591516,0.000013903897,0.000004853554,0.00005621929,0.0014191166,0.00016427311,0.000039210874,0.98902345,0.0015778095,0.0052548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029036868,0.000034706674,0.008384887,0.0000651427,0.000017114231,0.000063549494,0.004352375,0.0007161933,0.00010893152,0.9754378,0.010772909,0.000017371047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02162082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022373201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02983558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028611775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047046063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099809945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405617616","doi":"10.1017/ilr.2023.46","title":"United Mexican States <i>v</i>. Burr and Others","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Reports","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.014080882060206528,"score_gpt":0.3132602105635948,"score_spread":0.2991793285033883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405617616","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014849362,0.0022468253,0.00034936774,0.021579912,0.003211643,0.000054875374,0.0011305022,0.00013630783,0.9698056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022242881,0.0024633247,0.00068486604,0.024803719,0.0005547745,0.000084118015,0.0010489027,0.00010276851,0.94801474],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994873,0.000052162897,0.000015405945,0.00008605557,0.00019360175,0.00016546171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999584,0.00004476102,0.000021903816,0.000037096546,0.00024579876,0.000066349494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005718572,0.0003750821,0.00026029587,0.0007756401,0.0039145336,0.0031627344,0.0007167725,0.0019515109,0.14558262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012890766,0.00020309983,0.00040328965,0.0007762689,0.000572214,0.001275373,0.0015426589,0.0022181019,0.031287916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001915123,0.000018062121,0.0005333235,0.000041247808,0.0000046090154,0.00014971306,0.00014059962,0.000041906478,0.00015913376,0.046247426,0.92811304,0.024531811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029593748,0.0000021941905,0.00043958498,0.000042960804,0.0000029900073,0.000031283846,0.000109163855,0.000017602568,0.00007476495,0.0006217749,0.9986517,0.0000030637052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14486907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21261467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14558262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036495465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058503347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48702234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405717084","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4998522","title":"The Charter in Administrative Decision-Making: Defending the Duty to Take Charter Values (or Purposes) Into Account","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Duty; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.028403399140806966,"score_gpt":0.37341505116271884,"score_spread":0.34501165202191186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405717084","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0599981,0.00393753,0.1941554,0.42286503,0.002504938,0.0001647146,0.00010592024,0.0001685718,0.31609982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95635134,0.0008648466,0.021477053,0.012173853,0.0012615393,0.00017645332,0.00002327784,0.00011140856,0.0075600515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9173501,0.05823124,0.00218144,0.006151805,0.011527201,0.0045581986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8703368,0.09441182,0.010512861,0.013067561,0.008299466,0.0033714366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.084871374,0.0008338256,0.002021478,0.0033728709,0.012017882,0.028298328,0.004209535,0.02879824,0.0034036299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13167761,0.0012732992,0.0011776519,0.0033320135,0.10797321,0.032295477,0.010491864,0.02747134,0.0008577327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013368937,0.00000667903,0.00015157105,0.0000081955495,0.0000039622164,0.000018561375,0.0013784568,0.00019376843,0.000025274661,0.99489427,0.0014946933,0.0018111769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028878876,0.000008869641,0.00018854215,0.00006396808,0.0000074192058,0.000019601102,0.00057665404,0.0011727951,0.0001308685,0.98920316,0.008579825,0.00001943375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010394302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008834632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084871374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010360996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026889363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44884807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406150484","doi":"10.53555/sfs.v10i3.3276","title":"Prolonged Delay in Justice to The Victims of Rape Cases","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Criminology; Psychology; Medical emergency; Political science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.24771534764707248,"score_gpt":0.35563111347830295,"score_spread":0.10791576583123047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406150484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7907475,0.007696649,0.010962245,0.041340023,0.0012497798,0.0005226008,0.0003591404,0.00021578954,0.14690636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97733235,0.0016999512,0.001627727,0.0019923244,0.00028294555,0.00008117938,0.00006372686,0.000030374262,0.01688934],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939031,0.0016447891,0.0005435064,0.0006199285,0.0014242359,0.0018644453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908358,0.002779274,0.0024429918,0.00057653943,0.00209652,0.0012688248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027104819,0.00019357313,0.00027187166,0.0017598331,0.005772034,0.0031796682,0.0014623362,0.0023387724,0.008893764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023723362,0.0003231828,0.00043553195,0.0011529675,0.0017551465,0.0022757482,0.003166423,0.0026391165,0.0013220657],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062498375,0.0007044824,0.1481098,0.00081995706,0.00015847504,0.047712237,0.10758099,0.002651629,0.009563373,0.28939918,0.0633794,0.32929546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000117091564,0.0017029096,0.22238415,0.0022527894,0.00033706648,0.04056438,0.2069723,0.0045163617,0.008316155,0.07404314,0.43840808,0.00038559252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0097015705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013753577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0097015705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004199272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073022004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030467927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406390357","doi":"10.1016/s1553-3212(10)70191-6","title":"10.1016/s1553-3212(10)70191-6","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Electronic records; Internet privacy; Computer science; Computer security; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.00873362985547804,"score_gpt":0.21634067593288225,"score_spread":0.2076070460774042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406390357","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025573297,0.0002802593,0.00039044596,0.0003151121,0.00014763951,0.00006628324,0.00060434284,0.00059649907,0.9973437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005029271,0.00014005596,0.00022897209,0.00017616915,0.000038157723,0.000046236015,0.00030338735,0.00011547066,0.9984486],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927217,0.000060081755,0.000060608447,0.00025577605,0.0002119631,0.00013940202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820626,0.0005144682,0.00014037895,0.00023255202,0.00033764626,0.00056870724],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011430575,0.0025610426,0.0016838225,0.0030417687,0.002770191,0.0044809654,0.0031292734,0.0071314964,0.990515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018623805,0.00097117637,0.0012545813,0.0026414732,0.0020454514,0.005784814,0.0038698984,0.0025539256,0.9933062],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021722919,0.0001863982,0.0008443422,0.00054418267,0.00002663697,0.00020903898,0.00012752743,0.00035899706,0.0013113865,0.0075968523,0.41881713,0.5697602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038954495,0.00007526621,0.00059497356,0.00031769017,0.0000101447295,0.0002237057,0.00011391269,0.00016059654,0.00023117654,0.00080717047,0.9974074,0.000019084235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004907494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047634053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009485006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014433764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016355428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013529122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406433712","doi":"10.1016/s0029-7437(08)70197-6","title":"10.1016/s0029-7437(08)70197-6","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Business; Actuarial science; Computer security; Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.010065520683514932,"score_gpt":0.2232027286929123,"score_spread":0.21313720800939737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406433712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004656702,0.0003916227,0.0005583482,0.00039018583,0.00020719162,0.00009472319,0.00067472475,0.0006414823,0.996576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00068155467,0.00017806269,0.00032959576,0.00017253359,0.000046636014,0.000058126752,0.0003526401,0.00014019807,0.9980406],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991277,0.00007271865,0.00007056741,0.00030735874,0.00022148229,0.0002001626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977672,0.0006780682,0.00016343297,0.00026038897,0.00044114492,0.0006897098],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001382074,0.0031791541,0.0021520518,0.0036493351,0.0031327296,0.004932698,0.0039915196,0.0077285874,0.99049604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001990813,0.0012351648,0.0016634113,0.0034022762,0.0032052442,0.0067440765,0.0038268187,0.0031458223,0.9931485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033706537,0.0002873632,0.0012928576,0.0008306174,0.000048280825,0.0003161396,0.0002095428,0.0005054631,0.002041438,0.010888915,0.33196953,0.6512728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005124375,0.00013329879,0.0008450585,0.00050711894,0.000016537244,0.00032970373,0.00020578098,0.000261197,0.00036213326,0.0009661894,0.99629515,0.00002648215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005840152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042836475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009503961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015970552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020204382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013556182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406441747","doi":"10.1016/s0029-7437(05)70994-0","title":"10.1016/s0029-7437(05)70994-0","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Ophthalmology","score_opus":0.010083205922202836,"score_gpt":0.22343028214758626,"score_spread":0.21334707622538343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406441747","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003703483,0.00033537313,0.0006209926,0.0003726878,0.00019515444,0.00008146412,0.0005522562,0.0005975719,0.9968742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00058278407,0.00015666426,0.00033128334,0.00014596895,0.000043574226,0.00004912483,0.00032527192,0.00013337044,0.99823207],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919444,0.00007352449,0.00006333096,0.00027490253,0.00021802461,0.00017576638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977596,0.0006277607,0.0001512138,0.0002724926,0.0004763804,0.00071259163],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012577465,0.0026742457,0.001856975,0.003513613,0.002775465,0.004651574,0.0036646067,0.00701811,0.989618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020775325,0.0010310374,0.0014489464,0.0032757868,0.0026346706,0.006016343,0.0033622717,0.0028233845,0.9922431],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024892268,0.00023214008,0.0009963538,0.00066045154,0.000037865517,0.0002469773,0.00017779558,0.00042949768,0.0018583236,0.011084215,0.33259892,0.6514285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033935532,0.00008771437,0.00066677446,0.0003589546,0.000011863562,0.00024365408,0.00014420558,0.00020208649,0.00027821446,0.00083722145,0.9971167,0.000018818422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005761579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041456334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010381997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014783047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019784076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014808655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406455807","doi":"10.1016/s0029-7437(09)70466-5","title":"10.1016/s0029-7437(09)70466-5","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"FLAGS register; Enforcement; Business; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.010046891217057163,"score_gpt":0.22316706769660413,"score_spread":0.21312017647954698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406455807","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039658247,0.0003591109,0.0006134794,0.0003577549,0.00020194579,0.0000818612,0.000683975,0.00063002435,0.99667525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007101982,0.00017053063,0.00034757043,0.00014886292,0.000050359075,0.00005175923,0.00038772324,0.00015048144,0.9979824],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991621,0.00007188681,0.00006588223,0.00029302796,0.00022784028,0.00017933977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997654,0.0006935089,0.00016979632,0.0002837499,0.00047960234,0.0007193256],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012804071,0.0027485748,0.0019353237,0.003507103,0.0027217488,0.0048357323,0.0035746866,0.006622325,0.99019355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019839562,0.0010942505,0.0014949981,0.0033626857,0.0027911498,0.005974027,0.0034942846,0.0029477556,0.99275017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027552157,0.00023851113,0.0011248427,0.0006904047,0.000044177636,0.00026227272,0.0001702046,0.00049156294,0.0020365298,0.010597473,0.33800814,0.6460603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043118154,0.00010766805,0.00080112845,0.00041425953,0.000014298721,0.00029115903,0.00015411973,0.00025029774,0.0003506516,0.00090889726,0.9966409,0.000023490535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004959971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037337153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009806454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013900726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018514002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01398772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406473205","doi":"10.1016/s1541-9800(11)70674-3","title":"10.1016/s1541-9800(11)70674-3","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Atlanta; Law; Mandate; Political science; Public administration; Geography; Archaeology; Metropolitan area","score_opus":0.008300268137937121,"score_gpt":0.21523492958806126,"score_spread":0.20693466145012412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406473205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003120499,0.0003419314,0.00046073302,0.0003278918,0.00017883259,0.00007286745,0.0005761657,0.0006165369,0.997113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005110335,0.00017180461,0.0002760305,0.00017769122,0.00004625077,0.000044294582,0.00029678692,0.00011730199,0.9983588],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992336,0.00005909386,0.000062649815,0.00027109138,0.00022296922,0.00015054125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979716,0.0006128472,0.00015069939,0.00024012894,0.00040803856,0.0006165977],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011122164,0.002693854,0.001687178,0.0030447706,0.0027124176,0.004273186,0.0030263038,0.006791833,0.9902228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001847629,0.000980394,0.0013514638,0.0027869772,0.0019729873,0.0060795275,0.0036269235,0.0027083317,0.9924239],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023537698,0.00019803422,0.00089570053,0.000587308,0.000030297444,0.00023281398,0.0001314023,0.00035930195,0.0015660219,0.006901973,0.3494034,0.6394585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040987477,0.00009296144,0.00065305945,0.00035936947,0.000012760841,0.00028303135,0.00012825389,0.00017329662,0.0003041491,0.0007400917,0.9971902,0.000021766955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004223526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039163693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009777188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001288572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014700707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013945878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406479632","doi":"10.1016/s0029-7437(05)70483-3","title":"10.1016/s0029-7437(05)70483-3","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort reform; Tort; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Law; Liability","score_opus":0.010079898730987453,"score_gpt":0.22343582159628342,"score_spread":0.21335592286529598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406479632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039651146,0.000383262,0.00062378874,0.00038448346,0.00020841906,0.000084333326,0.0006748175,0.00063557044,0.99660885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006475471,0.00016907972,0.00032811143,0.00015087391,0.000048988495,0.000050588602,0.00035840066,0.00014004148,0.99810636],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991804,0.00007061382,0.00006519342,0.0002865044,0.00021970281,0.00017761491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762803,0.00070975645,0.00017257102,0.00027888163,0.0004993689,0.0007114541],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012869451,0.0028078863,0.0020469264,0.0035287815,0.0028399213,0.0049597947,0.003737538,0.007130163,0.9899504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020504547,0.0010984343,0.0015166679,0.0034827737,0.002787097,0.006194757,0.0034161245,0.0030418325,0.9926823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027500323,0.00023560644,0.0010443213,0.0007186176,0.000042047934,0.00026401732,0.00017982273,0.00046208178,0.0019644955,0.010723021,0.33635786,0.6477331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040363637,0.000103996535,0.0007178571,0.00039437172,0.000013824954,0.0002732322,0.00015374632,0.00023452348,0.00031883997,0.0009145104,0.9968124,0.000022394388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005283659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003951511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0100495815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014976207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019695228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01433444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406486371","doi":"10.1016/s0029-7437(07)70390-7","title":"10.1016/s0029-7437(07)70390-7","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty to warn; Genetic testing; Computer science; Psychology; Computer security; Genetics; Biology; Confidentiality","score_opus":0.01012918362288393,"score_gpt":0.22367713164695321,"score_spread":0.2135479480240693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406486371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039728233,0.00037720607,0.0006058442,0.00038895206,0.00020761623,0.000080388585,0.00068542606,0.0006376648,0.99661946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00063670217,0.00016821173,0.00032049642,0.0001555274,0.000048471917,0.000050518363,0.00037927783,0.00014682172,0.99809414],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918133,0.00007173451,0.00006519019,0.0002767117,0.00022547257,0.00017963542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771214,0.0006822638,0.00016931623,0.00026536826,0.00046769064,0.0007031818],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012999981,0.002778024,0.0020026956,0.003449928,0.002782507,0.00490925,0.003566811,0.007012629,0.98972005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019925314,0.0010989965,0.0014524811,0.0033797575,0.0028153786,0.0060154162,0.0034692758,0.0029611953,0.99253935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025833928,0.00022373344,0.0010245222,0.00066733506,0.000039739076,0.0002470896,0.00016919343,0.00044841034,0.0019144072,0.0108175725,0.34966525,0.6345245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003948363,0.00009783257,0.00069907657,0.00037988857,0.00001278347,0.00025921088,0.00015493385,0.00022901429,0.0003295932,0.00092514657,0.9968514,0.000021683538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050784205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039121676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0102799535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014974687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020384833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0146631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406546955","doi":"10.1016/s1541-9800(07)70348-4","title":"10.1016/s1541-9800(07)70348-4","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Smoking prevention; Environmental health; Medicine; Business; Smoking cessation; Pathology","score_opus":0.008640582436949599,"score_gpt":0.2168628159482728,"score_spread":0.2082222335113232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406546955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035509304,0.00031066564,0.00045996474,0.0003654907,0.00017529438,0.00007433354,0.00062534714,0.0006691828,0.99696463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005353411,0.00014277457,0.0002695481,0.00018457751,0.000042321284,0.000042944233,0.0003244123,0.0001220914,0.998336],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993073,0.000057315807,0.000055212873,0.00023951266,0.00019934203,0.00014149332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980222,0.0005718246,0.00013881213,0.00023206873,0.00042567024,0.00060939946],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010534228,0.002497672,0.001542169,0.0028181176,0.0025929161,0.00408111,0.0028632407,0.0063052666,0.9905255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017966707,0.0008999535,0.0012273518,0.00264228,0.0018504955,0.0055014836,0.003383113,0.0025634435,0.9924764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023307264,0.00019406952,0.0009191905,0.00051156804,0.000027950504,0.00021803715,0.00012931049,0.00032675624,0.0015147637,0.0067733754,0.368142,0.6210099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039759092,0.00008400424,0.00066636293,0.00031143212,0.0000118175585,0.00025851768,0.00012638341,0.00016847112,0.0002973804,0.0006849241,0.99733174,0.000019186915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044149375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00394188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009474516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012317959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015018379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013514161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406575498","doi":"10.1016/s1553-3212(12)70056-0","title":"10.1016/s1553-3212(12)70056-0","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Business; Law and economics; Accounting; Economics","score_opus":0.009025969131172158,"score_gpt":0.2132866686552698,"score_spread":0.20426069952409764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406575498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026974862,0.00023598428,0.0004504344,0.00028679555,0.00014211296,0.000070327405,0.00051455374,0.00059368555,0.99743634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00045949838,0.000117724616,0.00023710664,0.00016056126,0.000031998497,0.000045134282,0.0002510242,0.00010667001,0.9985902],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992537,0.000059328948,0.00005757783,0.00027594273,0.00020602884,0.00014736774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839324,0.00041339206,0.000111074994,0.00021507329,0.00031212418,0.0005550303],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011383774,0.002520561,0.0016742591,0.0031818727,0.002907429,0.00445016,0.00305504,0.0071918913,0.99062926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019149766,0.00097607553,0.00132035,0.0026217091,0.0021189444,0.00584409,0.003926259,0.0024063657,0.99291766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023661974,0.00019902154,0.00091607944,0.00054771785,0.000027717535,0.00023123724,0.00014099907,0.0003791265,0.0013969549,0.008942869,0.40305942,0.5839222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033081935,0.00007328741,0.00053917925,0.00029622897,0.000009773174,0.00022245062,0.00011801088,0.00015119118,0.00020265332,0.00071171735,0.9976247,0.000017730836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054453453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005235547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009370744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015030254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00163362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013366222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406577230","doi":"10.1016/s1544-8800(09)70282-9","title":"10.1016/s1544-8800(09)70282-9","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.008589942541879891,"score_gpt":0.2163326638049174,"score_spread":0.2077427212630375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406577230","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036846794,0.00032414036,0.00046478256,0.00035803323,0.00017483241,0.00008111504,0.0006475834,0.0006962436,0.99688476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005822194,0.0001568988,0.0002924677,0.00019725064,0.000046473724,0.000048248952,0.0003328835,0.00012988031,0.99821365],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923456,0.000063431,0.00006486188,0.00027189584,0.0002043524,0.00016074641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784386,0.0006438131,0.00015116225,0.000257958,0.00043096382,0.00067225815],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011464445,0.0027150838,0.0017005744,0.002999103,0.0027886927,0.004180189,0.0030357924,0.00673141,0.9909566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019064504,0.0009949508,0.0013229513,0.0027251355,0.0021417923,0.0059029097,0.0036496904,0.0027192803,0.9925844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028441355,0.00021802823,0.0009877406,0.0005723928,0.000033331653,0.00024985787,0.00013874791,0.00039133875,0.0015980407,0.007039461,0.3729396,0.61554706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005175131,0.0001053726,0.00078921375,0.00035956447,0.000014322658,0.00029993107,0.00014941145,0.00020841244,0.00031746205,0.0007325883,0.9969489,0.000023117154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050353063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043453374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0090433955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001290343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015356592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01289928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407746090","doi":"10.5771/9780739146576","title":"Same-Sex Marriage in the Americas","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Lexington Books","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.0278914142674676,"score_gpt":0.30948495836989265,"score_spread":0.28159354410242504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407746090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009549753,0.111431,0.00026400347,0.020599894,0.0026585658,0.000017219407,0.000059062953,0.000033247983,0.85538733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19480354,0.16609566,0.0007891512,0.018688645,0.0016003548,0.000054157816,0.00019531249,0.00005780164,0.6177154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996213,0.00008616245,0.000013281573,0.00004211129,0.00016765315,0.00006959472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998272,0.000055890003,0.000016608396,0.0000108482955,0.00005090838,0.000038621532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029263538,0.00021472205,0.00021184374,0.00076872937,0.003801035,0.0021018432,0.0003496892,0.00094959023,0.0087382775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064080267,0.00015705917,0.00018783717,0.0013288826,0.002338265,0.0014772331,0.0011793431,0.0019971177,0.0011050312],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009529048,0.000057682642,0.0010421888,0.00017147977,0.000004583355,0.00039339426,0.023297742,0.00014649423,0.00023283425,0.580078,0.26269662,0.13186935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017516927,0.0000058296,0.0014389472,0.00021596118,0.0000014715324,0.00015912167,0.0037553166,0.000021750215,0.000028446166,0.007121678,0.9872463,0.0000034441941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042978786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09666209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042978786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031537767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040121814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085457265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407798530","doi":"10.53555/sfs.v10i1.3380","title":"Attaining Access to Justice Through Legal Aid Mechanism: Leaving No One Behind in Modern Era","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Economic Justice; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Engineering ethics; Criminology; Sociology; Epistemology; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.32213211815145576,"score_gpt":0.38196167480978827,"score_spread":0.059829556658332506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407798530","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05666469,0.035813555,0.008511129,0.51741815,0.0029666554,0.00010155006,0.00007497221,0.00019130562,0.37825793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83278537,0.018046333,0.006257632,0.0701111,0.0022665695,0.00009866545,0.000045026616,0.000057853544,0.07033153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996646,0.0010391885,0.0001370175,0.00028107408,0.0009624172,0.0009342397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974667,0.0011135085,0.000252631,0.00024881394,0.00050708983,0.00041117193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036846672,0.00017383264,0.00030515337,0.0008878794,0.006846225,0.01059233,0.001170975,0.0075274943,0.0040235594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039034605,0.00024515527,0.00036192854,0.00085121556,0.01991944,0.009943077,0.0041501084,0.0071684946,0.00089891785],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015747119,0.00004407926,0.0006433125,0.0001442614,0.0000048165707,0.00046939525,0.0052950005,0.000097597724,0.00026546745,0.9377366,0.022445148,0.032838624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021215503,0.00011438932,0.0019043835,0.0008897798,0.000018724759,0.0011906876,0.010422962,0.0005613465,0.00089379365,0.29522032,0.6886738,0.000088625675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008023557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012431996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01059233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053961556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010426497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039152026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408074171","doi":"10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.4381","title":"THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES (PREVENTION) ACT, 1967: A CRITICAL STUDY","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ShodhKosh Journal of Visual and Performing Arts","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Law; Psychology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03903233247455417,"score_gpt":0.4126015211518782,"score_spread":0.373569188677324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408074171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10041123,0.12808599,0.0047755786,0.21140033,0.00631245,0.0002827265,0.00022429523,0.00004473383,0.54846275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88399565,0.06839061,0.0013127559,0.021879485,0.004084982,0.0001446807,0.00007960053,0.000062557396,0.020049555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99465996,0.002837643,0.00020231852,0.00050215673,0.0009274706,0.00087052095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722652,0.023909435,0.0012518668,0.0003857518,0.0017832307,0.00040446498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008025015,0.0006461134,0.00031434474,0.005645711,0.013928297,0.014116015,0.0017736498,0.0067947474,0.0020999857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016979093,0.0006095475,0.00055486924,0.005489764,0.04051186,0.011901612,0.0025881084,0.011446314,0.00035713997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024933684,0.000035343175,0.0009115551,0.00025802353,0.0000054850707,0.0009620102,0.0536567,0.00017594887,0.00012169133,0.9117469,0.018423975,0.013677382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012739787,0.0000780685,0.00639085,0.0030561206,0.000033138538,0.0008110539,0.10594032,0.00045797543,0.00111851,0.08999963,0.79202235,0.000079315214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03615069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03176115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03615069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021053389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010324897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15275377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408098665","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1455","title":"R. v. J.J., Judicial Discretion and the Charter","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Judicial discretion; Discretion; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology","score_opus":0.02106667931831491,"score_gpt":0.3169317766388853,"score_spread":0.29586509732057037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408098665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07687513,0.05757176,0.023252932,0.37130278,0.0049980064,0.00039823362,0.0008973023,0.00041018738,0.4642936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7322095,0.006572521,0.009462851,0.16432668,0.0012962937,0.00020000707,0.00016695255,0.00011453172,0.085650705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98861516,0.0019767266,0.00044659324,0.001690858,0.0045771417,0.00269361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911957,0.0049237707,0.0006092208,0.00040582856,0.0023552615,0.000510187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011607364,0.0004065101,0.00043328418,0.001121522,0.011674449,0.0075180456,0.0022043367,0.012414381,0.0017482418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02470809,0.00075326563,0.00084069866,0.0010913658,0.010994733,0.002910166,0.0016551646,0.009853619,0.00049590925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042473846,0.000015086537,0.00090296223,0.000063168736,0.000018071329,0.00035325153,0.0023793073,0.00034529247,0.00073514413,0.91444695,0.070348375,0.010349941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002716607,0.00013177458,0.010543099,0.0005158869,0.00013770981,0.0004702611,0.0021684403,0.0016305039,0.0032745716,0.29949543,0.68097633,0.00038434836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6690584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7615197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33094162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01697817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036384832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66578114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408152624","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v33i1.2212","title":"Legal Relationship between Universities and their Students – How Accountable and to what Extent in Law are Universities Liable for Student Suicides?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.035682557447261676,"score_gpt":0.3381746291294324,"score_spread":0.30249207168217074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408152624","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.630393,0.0042184363,0.012766373,0.16785364,0.00055405445,0.00008598324,0.000076933444,0.00006137636,0.1839902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99331206,0.0003401579,0.00033358406,0.0029575452,0.000080595186,0.000013125323,0.000007260093,0.000004871189,0.002950812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9757263,0.014711425,0.0010693412,0.0014483178,0.0035214587,0.0035231553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97000307,0.010323673,0.008546598,0.0018531005,0.0034635386,0.0058099767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011203284,0.00017602967,0.00047190097,0.0016741332,0.011262198,0.015077217,0.001588793,0.0058516217,0.004785158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05168794,0.0002750884,0.00038983198,0.0015610296,0.027218794,0.009264057,0.009478489,0.006529898,0.00086839584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004728252,0.0001440233,0.044537652,0.00007064478,0.00003987173,0.0010619663,0.07714267,0.00046646394,0.00042743073,0.8348207,0.0061473004,0.035094086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004019674,0.00032941424,0.0548922,0.0010823369,0.000086924556,0.0024406242,0.21549216,0.0025831987,0.0013369207,0.5609495,0.16045949,0.00030699748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016285311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013331807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016285311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008580568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0130777685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062256634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408290791","doi":"10.37419/lr.v12.i2.7","title":"The Excessive Fines Clause in the Federal Courts: A Quarter-Century of Narrowing","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Law; Business; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.016926483652978382,"score_gpt":0.3373497357116555,"score_spread":0.3204232520586771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408290791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13314076,0.08348102,0.044766508,0.2988084,0.0035572397,0.000063103806,0.00014914472,0.00020399688,0.4358299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91066164,0.01125812,0.0068036416,0.05056592,0.002375215,0.000080117956,0.00005232342,0.000072019466,0.018131021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98929274,0.0043574246,0.00045960088,0.001676747,0.0029777354,0.0012357933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915651,0.0056521087,0.00048294305,0.00082519255,0.0012250494,0.000249571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011136602,0.0003371305,0.00058434514,0.002621613,0.012020957,0.015637431,0.0014581388,0.009519406,0.0013913984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01681333,0.0006844309,0.0005466705,0.0024116659,0.036975723,0.012334822,0.0038124304,0.018347561,0.00026366205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007575687,0.000007697512,0.00016275032,0.0000120062305,0.0000026138512,0.000023401795,0.0022209054,0.000157066,0.000082324535,0.9850891,0.0028070372,0.009427489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020281093,0.00006285813,0.0024349457,0.0006080581,0.000031012867,0.000086053085,0.00355749,0.0009573873,0.0008711077,0.7036208,0.28765345,0.00009663147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060327478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05463462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060327478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016733378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0097762095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.121409714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408877377","doi":"10.63485/xtdzb-f4n83","title":"Central v. distributed OA archiving in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.020505662432438447,"score_gpt":0.2830930256271493,"score_spread":0.2625873631947108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408877377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009126669,0.01666975,0.013568973,0.13772477,0.007209029,0.0011274748,0.02426864,0.010191688,0.78011304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13351232,0.015839009,0.039720245,0.03821965,0.0014713207,0.0007410103,0.016907638,0.0038342858,0.74975455],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97842103,0.0018129249,0.0022938706,0.001786142,0.012218982,0.0034670124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8794871,0.0083339615,0.002665173,0.012676816,0.088056415,0.0087805055],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014023281,0.00087023596,0.0011368212,0.00911819,0.016930357,0.023634149,0.0046120016,0.0051014517,0.10669114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059690904,0.001640083,0.0012403073,0.016313232,0.0052714157,0.008668812,0.005730975,0.0045575495,0.024658127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022836514,0.00002549273,0.0013087495,0.000454759,0.000053815107,0.00019662626,0.0009007917,0.00040425584,0.0005330516,0.11001759,0.81586707,0.070009425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094847295,0.000017337554,0.0039014714,0.00048274928,0.000050136696,0.0000960536,0.00067804387,0.0008606532,0.0006683988,0.008409921,0.9846406,0.00009974278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9811257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98324955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.995388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12848096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4068198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93219894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409907621","doi":"10.1017/cls.2024.21","title":"A School for Self-Represented Litigants: A People-Centred Approach to Access to Justice in Family Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Irvine; University of Windsor","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Family law; Law; Criminology; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.03103329439725823,"score_gpt":0.3047306412052184,"score_spread":0.2736973468079602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409907621","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4757293,0.0025304793,0.057899237,0.22514863,0.0021783877,0.003303527,0.00018400684,0.0006884945,0.23233789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94538754,0.0007946635,0.0213539,0.008378777,0.00017519399,0.0009068235,0.000060534512,0.00010466929,0.02283788],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9767844,0.017324634,0.0002995257,0.0011498979,0.0016653979,0.0027762458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844481,0.0036642891,0.0005807847,0.0008084294,0.000937246,0.009561244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021795794,0.0005123597,0.0005622405,0.0022639774,0.021285076,0.010593799,0.0031499835,0.003927658,0.014649002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011972561,0.00046777973,0.00079088047,0.0010073223,0.02632989,0.0069058524,0.02549992,0.0068020397,0.0014566593],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068774694,0.002593078,0.008491298,0.00046857013,0.000037806516,0.0013955447,0.6839365,0.00044816802,0.0010839758,0.13725296,0.04146862,0.12275473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013414543,0.0006186346,0.006430056,0.00065105036,0.00003206419,0.00039608663,0.58187586,0.0006269646,0.00081923726,0.082303144,0.3260617,0.000051094383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010837897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03530741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9891621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012690399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03308848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11526853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409970106","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5235704","title":"Collecting Conditions: A Snapshot of Supervised Release in 2023 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut&amp;nbsp;","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Columbia College","funders":"","keywords":"Snapshot (computer storage); School district; Lake district; Environmental science; Geography; Archaeology; Psychology; Computer science; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.024891622448299802,"score_gpt":0.3307014232711885,"score_spread":0.3058098008228887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409970106","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56483483,0.0031114167,0.0023077566,0.013183532,0.00056681404,0.0014801528,0.23724724,0.0010142345,0.17625396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8171406,0.0019570733,0.006645796,0.005400026,0.00020197396,0.001338986,0.06782049,0.00051022257,0.09898488],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771464,0.00025053252,0.00015493484,0.00028180942,0.00093647576,0.00066150393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99242604,0.0010816643,0.0014154366,0.00031543407,0.0031269088,0.0016345049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016283806,0.0002804673,0.00032555344,0.0032304295,0.004440841,0.0036329667,0.001156386,0.0012043712,0.013308702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064453566,0.0006080475,0.00021657028,0.0050061666,0.00066478585,0.0012159552,0.001810349,0.0024015377,0.0030533313],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047773708,0.0004251406,0.29778913,0.0007257488,0.00011441146,0.0029033828,0.012889229,0.0024456454,0.004508763,0.007766195,0.5769773,0.09297732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029489454,0.000063106905,0.9001934,0.0002504802,0.000022390406,0.00017817979,0.010025228,0.0005171424,0.0007766729,0.00049356517,0.08737202,0.00007834182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68625623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90027153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68625623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0105486475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019132053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6311829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410597222","doi":"10.9741/2327-8455.1214","title":"Blackjack At Thirty Thousand Feet: America's Attempt To Enforce Its Ban On In-flight Gambling Extraterritorially","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine","score_opus":0.18855747931655534,"score_gpt":0.4732266562161891,"score_spread":0.2846691768996338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410597222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1552422,0.009725494,0.0035582404,0.37793797,0.005683233,0.00012573822,0.0003237861,0.00019501352,0.44720834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50582176,0.00605344,0.0012159557,0.32470712,0.0015296176,0.00009381335,0.00011137022,0.000101879676,0.16036496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846077,0.00032674227,0.00006717054,0.00021021218,0.0005290033,0.0004062443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964579,0.0022905066,0.00025959234,0.00012943998,0.00065008376,0.00021253018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003454942,0.00022441146,0.000313294,0.00064532534,0.00717043,0.0046171616,0.0012039434,0.009004734,0.0040582404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005414598,0.00027117683,0.0004556092,0.0007880909,0.0044816504,0.0019495729,0.0015682329,0.00918213,0.0007443261],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055327535,0.00012393424,0.006397601,0.00018378944,0.00004040875,0.0012798478,0.021032715,0.0003130476,0.0021720594,0.5291771,0.39947727,0.039746895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005542352,0.00012119078,0.015024173,0.00053173275,0.000117890144,0.00033807917,0.018293487,0.0005058851,0.0035197027,0.028401656,0.93298304,0.00010769591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14322571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23138133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14322571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032265764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009311275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28478414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410814135","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-88455-9_2","title":"Legacy in Practice: A Family-Driven Path to Sustainability Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Bible College","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Path (computing); Sociology; Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Computer science; Philosophy; Ecology","score_opus":0.017128585902562977,"score_gpt":0.3328503572216762,"score_spread":0.3157217713191132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410814135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010231704,0.003397748,0.022986328,0.040756185,0.00046630498,0.00005636284,0.000043791057,0.00007166253,0.9219898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53428686,0.002568277,0.012258152,0.008807228,0.00051372004,0.00018056993,0.000061532104,0.00024335283,0.44108027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996418,0.0016896218,0.000097052725,0.00048056245,0.00090471416,0.00040997693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956182,0.0021758818,0.00020906946,0.0007650223,0.0008123739,0.00041935555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006341631,0.0004118471,0.00041859414,0.0012909306,0.0068442873,0.011607638,0.0021316349,0.006804305,0.01746413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0099152615,0.00036318426,0.00031159224,0.0013487077,0.03643375,0.012417889,0.0057836673,0.006942135,0.0021279138],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.3080125e-7,0.0000058051733,0.000031487245,0.000003496188,4.731702e-7,0.000015300517,0.0014277002,0.00003461094,0.000010799346,0.9906019,0.003861406,0.004006338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003222179,0.000008025447,0.00015704216,0.00010479377,0.0000016407242,0.0000654216,0.0025269547,0.0002888574,0.00008074492,0.79801106,0.19874495,0.0000072792427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016346337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027598204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01746413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009059603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013792659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06573236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411373773","doi":"10.17323/1999-5431-2016-0-3-69-90","title":"The Stabilization of the Regulatory Burden: The \"One-In, One-Out\" Principle Implementation Challenges","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Issues","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Burden of proof; Precautionary principle; Political science; Law; Biology; Biotechnology","score_opus":0.08423281540410126,"score_gpt":0.3767610727661123,"score_spread":0.29252825736201105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411373773","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08954535,0.0048417114,0.27053592,0.3395087,0.002615312,0.00046386945,0.00009924096,0.00037180755,0.29201803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89203423,0.0011583999,0.045608487,0.03551455,0.0007775949,0.00040671046,0.0000326613,0.0001905781,0.024276854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8922748,0.048664328,0.004150949,0.012305959,0.037107054,0.005496919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93766195,0.03848159,0.004779677,0.009026577,0.008460552,0.001589602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06894221,0.0007003523,0.001303438,0.0012511683,0.007887547,0.0136686135,0.0039482806,0.013131575,0.0025513568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06430515,0.0007935344,0.0019077356,0.0009712828,0.034404725,0.015104921,0.008556737,0.019730035,0.00083029625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017794904,0.000054897337,0.00069925253,0.00009906875,0.000025368288,0.00010249103,0.0037025115,0.00070928124,0.00046624636,0.9731618,0.004622716,0.0163386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061026116,0.00037724437,0.0028747218,0.00068188,0.00006621089,0.000604532,0.0060303113,0.004289324,0.0028182876,0.7647284,0.21728061,0.00018750207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0079513015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056149196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06894221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009913852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029496357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3646056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412110468","doi":"10.1099/ijsem.0.006819","title":"Judicial Opinion 132","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Food and Agriculture; Ministerio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital, Gobierno de España; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Joint Genome Institute; Canadian Patient Safety Institute; Office of Science; U.S. Department of Agriculture; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Biology","score_opus":0.01683935603797627,"score_gpt":0.31787951172082934,"score_spread":0.3010401556828531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412110468","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008150799,0.0020072774,0.004544148,0.36585173,0.03828132,0.00081169006,0.001283192,0.0004482467,0.5786216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05869129,0.0011519039,0.0037539618,0.43496686,0.013252109,0.0006307562,0.0006327655,0.000370806,0.48654947],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97501445,0.0039346567,0.002617518,0.0034525169,0.010279923,0.0047009243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9629738,0.012043451,0.0012668429,0.0018106719,0.02065554,0.0012495798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015426943,0.0007151695,0.0012034349,0.0016221405,0.012160394,0.0103058005,0.003928111,0.03212471,0.045017336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07675911,0.0008989748,0.001511551,0.0016828064,0.0039322944,0.004632976,0.003999457,0.02039032,0.025629153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035085854,0.000032061835,0.00029202364,0.00007052598,0.000011196406,0.000636221,0.001355612,0.000079497644,0.00072069676,0.11624443,0.87066805,0.009854531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017078642,0.000022755445,0.00045070332,0.00017103586,0.00002104908,0.00014891605,0.00062924996,0.00017835431,0.00035616764,0.008515128,0.98944956,0.000039902676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026273618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029089786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045017336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009629005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021125557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15059799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412633012","doi":"10.59350/3mq01-c7g13","title":"Supreme Court of Canada Supports York University Appeal","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.017981339544266464,"score_gpt":0.23931905268012924,"score_spread":0.22133771313586276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412633012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022391137,0.0040751444,0.0021205957,0.12917249,0.0027274338,0.00029344438,0.0034576545,0.00019405091,0.835568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25660488,0.002500663,0.0022724639,0.051648732,0.0011035679,0.00023726182,0.001235846,0.00015350399,0.6842431],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909773,0.00039019177,0.00022180783,0.0010666898,0.0041575944,0.0031863158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99250364,0.001802927,0.00011913676,0.00025124362,0.0044700624,0.0008529202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034625533,0.0006734366,0.0008315222,0.0022108047,0.029444639,0.010943395,0.0025826737,0.010440149,0.03143426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01767834,0.00084122113,0.00086934137,0.002453174,0.0054518026,0.0019530514,0.002530348,0.011968358,0.0030006762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037466427,0.000020493602,0.001059733,0.000037272766,0.000017756092,0.00038446617,0.0011594598,0.00025418593,0.00032110655,0.65406024,0.33402175,0.0086260885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007097037,0.000015668911,0.0039580115,0.00022851626,0.00007248915,0.00007683627,0.0012665304,0.0013820416,0.00066907285,0.047412477,0.944742,0.00010530827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97376245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98435193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07648801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07648801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.164485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5549619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412991209","doi":"10.54119/jflp.rojl5550","title":"Food Law &amp; Policy: An Essential Part of Today's Legal Academy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Food Law & Policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Engineering, Michigan State University; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Temple University; Fordham University; Santa Clara University; University of Oregon; University of Miami; University of South Carolina; Georgia State University; Loyola Marymount University; University of Cincinnati; Pepperdine University; University of Denver; Georgetown University; University of Louisville; University of California, Los Angeles; University of Washington; Baylor University; University of Connecticut; Michigan State University; University of Kansas; Ohio State University; Wake Forest University; Loyola University Chicago; Harvard University; Northwestern University; University of Missouri; University of Pittsburgh; Syracuse University; University of Oklahoma; University of Southern California; Louisiana State University; University of Pennsylvania; George Washington University; Tulane University; Yale University; University of Wisconsin-Madison; Arizona State University; University of Notre Dame; Yeshiva University; Emory University; Marquette University; West Virginia University; Florida State University; Case Western Reserve University; University of Minnesota; Brigham Young University; Vanderbilt University; York University; George Mason University; Boston College","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.052120436121788544,"score_gpt":0.38265434869161224,"score_spread":0.3305339125698237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412991209","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032409497,0.021489572,0.0055563245,0.6736151,0.0019721785,0.00003189527,0.000108088374,0.000091021444,0.26472637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80441934,0.020935452,0.0060227597,0.10647428,0.0045437533,0.00011972193,0.00013777861,0.00010031409,0.05724655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888053,0.0032200613,0.00038171327,0.0010713666,0.004901284,0.0016203633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9717271,0.015436565,0.0025379804,0.001612817,0.0048101307,0.003875435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018562565,0.00024091538,0.00038522852,0.0023974127,0.013065281,0.02173253,0.0014346419,0.007743756,0.00751073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028156087,0.00045407235,0.00031995372,0.0028632407,0.027297564,0.022699561,0.0056629013,0.010824461,0.0011477437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061944543,0.000030180336,0.0013729281,0.000046716676,0.000003766892,0.00005868106,0.0031610222,0.0000943629,0.0001167628,0.92336607,0.041557986,0.030185353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004712018,0.000022508912,0.0046598874,0.0006145704,0.0000057678803,0.00008534711,0.006832517,0.00022805638,0.00020460531,0.24729519,0.7400124,0.000034477824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013327242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021315033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02173253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01419667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033047926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103004515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413128904","doi":"10.32920/29896184.v1","title":"If It Wasn’t Required Before, It Is Now: All Family Lawyers Must Screen for Family Violence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Internet privacy; Criminology; Domestic violence; Law; Business; Psychology; Political science; Medical emergency; Computer science; Medicine; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control","score_opus":0.0360926448195204,"score_gpt":0.33408760908523744,"score_spread":0.29799496426571703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413128904","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00492481,0.0012987992,0.004661047,0.90215003,0.0049117994,0.00005658953,0.000092118804,0.00014429822,0.08176049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2752012,0.002563767,0.015304565,0.5625357,0.0031957526,0.00015398761,0.00023233237,0.00019291085,0.14061964],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990276,0.0029407055,0.0006105781,0.0013100288,0.0025714783,0.0022912386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840248,0.0049626557,0.0010742899,0.0018662602,0.004471327,0.0036006125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01118567,0.00028963046,0.00045096103,0.00058814726,0.012608982,0.009129117,0.0016488307,0.013099116,0.02589815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028013479,0.00049218565,0.0006802794,0.00039681816,0.017844258,0.012289118,0.0040347804,0.02001896,0.0074689947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000651406,0.00016924329,0.005401618,0.00018236478,0.000017351911,0.00088140316,0.014749139,0.00013299141,0.0017379253,0.33751878,0.54883516,0.090308964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030131949,0.00011463743,0.005771577,0.00042722686,0.000015705034,0.0008513336,0.011724585,0.00027894875,0.0012489597,0.09912492,0.8803098,0.00010220052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06250763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0718661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06250763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007824783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019806875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124287605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413129202","doi":"10.32920/29896187.v1","title":"Judging Family Violence: Recommendations for Judicial Practices and Guidelines in Family Violence Cases","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Criminology; Family law; Political science; Psychology; Medicine; Medical emergency; Human factors and ergonomics; Law; Poison control","score_opus":0.10017146434965322,"score_gpt":0.44044627123906105,"score_spread":0.3402748068894078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413129202","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003977447,0.02290089,0.04902207,0.8353207,0.009787593,0.004746536,0.0006822901,0.0023829031,0.071179554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07525696,0.03555782,0.56302434,0.26093096,0.009723781,0.013041249,0.0022348086,0.0009411763,0.03928892],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8293487,0.07801643,0.034818128,0.0070612743,0.03595448,0.01480094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.52326566,0.20225735,0.017865729,0.016341528,0.208202,0.03206773],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2023623,0.001859192,0.003193524,0.015557467,0.020221276,0.024208521,0.020764947,0.06198899,0.008625662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34096563,0.0034693845,0.003503204,0.0091220895,0.01723461,0.020534223,0.012346562,0.038015574,0.007969995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039083683,0.0006004559,0.0037069048,0.0013436979,0.000025878997,0.0009878558,0.0082736295,0.0017872173,0.0005038252,0.06663642,0.80553865,0.11055643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031295125,0.00019005,0.009396232,0.02200168,0.00014307252,0.0012048535,0.018714055,0.0041401796,0.0008244656,0.12619218,0.81620014,0.000680191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10036416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21388556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2023623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017690202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14544523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9836293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244051","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v15i2.127","title":"Crown Immunity in Class Proceedings: The Injustice of Barring Institutional Historical Abuse Claims","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Sovereign immunity; Legislation; Political science; Liability; Redress; Class action; Supreme court; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.07469835458697197,"score_gpt":0.3140843348932329,"score_spread":0.23938598030626093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3400159,0.002200607,0.008658821,0.013853378,0.0002994845,0.00017649663,0.00007141583,0.00009167185,0.63463223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98567736,0.0004452918,0.0007193266,0.0014166354,0.000080044854,0.000026858861,0.000013793845,0.000011168019,0.011609576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98942065,0.002116887,0.00038713202,0.0008811185,0.0033541468,0.0038402085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98203135,0.008325605,0.0024669513,0.001786661,0.0039024823,0.0014870011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007058212,0.00024974943,0.0003241709,0.0021643352,0.017909307,0.010103569,0.002738038,0.0066554,0.008710405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021928005,0.0003682832,0.00062693015,0.0014830868,0.015010165,0.0024882888,0.005472671,0.007014844,0.00047759886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006860688,0.00018342023,0.024888882,0.00011128872,0.000050610462,0.003422807,0.021388678,0.001748734,0.001417966,0.8947378,0.012267677,0.039713457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018010678,0.0004905068,0.137585,0.0020699052,0.0007498752,0.0068262136,0.07864653,0.012656865,0.013462641,0.23309831,0.5137033,0.00053074304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38988927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48226333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61011076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024695357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028611716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7752397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413465329","doi":"10.29173/mlj1392","title":"The Effect of R. v. Morrison on Sexual Assault Law: Is the Reasonable Steps Requirement an Articulation of Mens Rea or a Statutory Bar on the Defence of Mistaken Belief?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mens rea; Statutory law; Sexual assault; Law; Articulation (sociology); Statutory interpretation; Criminal law; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Poison control; Medicine; Suicide prevention; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.03271057274661248,"score_gpt":0.31713863252725577,"score_spread":0.2844280597806433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413465329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17688408,0.0043213153,0.005743164,0.26518267,0.0011569794,0.00016695789,0.000264914,0.00014253726,0.54613733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7948775,0.0016073397,0.002566028,0.15257782,0.00046937252,0.000111638314,0.000052990108,0.00006465765,0.04767266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919292,0.0020784587,0.0002599108,0.0011244665,0.0027074546,0.0019005028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873302,0.008951327,0.0008106972,0.0006198765,0.001586764,0.0007010709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00871568,0.0004416081,0.0005303786,0.0012526553,0.006937699,0.0060363826,0.0021974235,0.01039804,0.004113997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025269842,0.0006901418,0.0009111957,0.0008969038,0.017169828,0.003928432,0.003444866,0.012880507,0.00066242117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007322612,0.000036538084,0.0023870775,0.000053213218,0.000024199582,0.0006930827,0.003991309,0.00032932198,0.00090903696,0.95888644,0.023154924,0.009461536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048214203,0.0005550798,0.029945897,0.0012571174,0.00067255186,0.0012159419,0.012770839,0.0055208025,0.009726377,0.49843445,0.43874595,0.00067288545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48620299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5679847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51379704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014387082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021586893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9667459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413491303","doi":"10.64628/aap.qguy9drpk","title":"La Cour suprême du Canada a tort de ne pas traduire ses décisions rendues avant 1970","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Psychology","score_opus":0.02278039579421288,"score_gpt":0.2836202769346866,"score_spread":0.26083988114047374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413491303","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24619716,0.0108559765,0.0061378633,0.06824069,0.0020688123,0.0003069148,0.0024097844,0.00028911218,0.66349363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5889237,0.0017133555,0.0025696817,0.007597747,0.0002478409,0.00008175934,0.00027833573,0.00009812318,0.39848948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869457,0.0012726896,0.00029225112,0.00148539,0.005793151,0.0042108106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941117,0.0018885748,0.00019962987,0.00022722737,0.002879406,0.00069344166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004429736,0.0006865541,0.0007455596,0.0021643292,0.021471243,0.012059499,0.0020887812,0.009214971,0.013344691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015705153,0.0010851144,0.0010440333,0.0021248874,0.0069883987,0.0020259144,0.001984998,0.0107328035,0.0010999381],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012884945,0.000069428905,0.0051663257,0.00006387246,0.000071459915,0.0005801752,0.0040354105,0.0019283134,0.0010901403,0.8925884,0.072271526,0.022006111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012198404,0.00008682445,0.029257927,0.00028196874,0.00012214738,0.0002590483,0.0046669785,0.0029019797,0.003582935,0.039592978,0.91888756,0.0002377034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9861951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99191874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12585531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12585531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18114643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91314846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413492554","doi":"10.64628/aam.crpfmdaha","title":"New Brunswick’s notwithstanding clause use could spur Supreme Court action","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Spur; Action (physics); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering; Physics","score_opus":0.08332863056189613,"score_gpt":0.35784609865889316,"score_spread":0.27451746809699706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413492554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25869018,0.0014336708,0.0023055288,0.11113282,0.0020821367,0.00044145304,0.0011737369,0.00013184319,0.62260866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63158405,0.0007515305,0.0022512798,0.06402219,0.00022481676,0.00025764998,0.0003580153,0.00008689971,0.3004636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99376255,0.0009179933,0.00024642743,0.0007934178,0.0018974519,0.0023821301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98696494,0.0069287485,0.00076806307,0.00093290256,0.0028145935,0.0015907384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008206762,0.00041371246,0.0004367622,0.0021858301,0.0115770195,0.01147969,0.0028067613,0.0086060995,0.019740243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021373495,0.0007353734,0.00089322135,0.0022556356,0.0050524855,0.0028616101,0.004034131,0.0089873485,0.0013345401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031180462,0.00034442949,0.030872457,0.00013317373,0.00012333857,0.0016684089,0.011123109,0.00084733084,0.0036651986,0.73440117,0.17556533,0.040944222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003979057,0.00020623398,0.08363373,0.0005333524,0.00035207538,0.00026610965,0.01867326,0.001522641,0.0066013657,0.046640866,0.8408315,0.00034092486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8274163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96547914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1725837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04550495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06868089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3472001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413509072","doi":"10.64628/aam.ghg75u4vu","title":"How regulatory agencies, not the courts, are imposing COVID-19 vaccine mandates","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Virology; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Business; Political science; Public administration; Medicine; Outbreak","score_opus":0.042201717369762,"score_gpt":0.3080121269447169,"score_spread":0.26581040957495494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413509072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10871266,0.0033216584,0.02642597,0.26869786,0.0020879984,0.0005157017,0.0006700205,0.00029660892,0.5892716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88681316,0.0015272648,0.008278657,0.054478437,0.00069300045,0.00027919994,0.0002220089,0.00019202332,0.047516268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.91904026,0.040349897,0.0032165125,0.0066781044,0.017266346,0.013448913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92112017,0.04924629,0.007149035,0.0047581303,0.014159539,0.0035668574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.057502568,0.00028929018,0.00059030124,0.003092713,0.007637007,0.025905741,0.0026306992,0.012072897,0.011216222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.119237825,0.00085872423,0.0009661244,0.00185845,0.011511952,0.009759501,0.003741025,0.01003138,0.0023098544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004087785,0.00011813663,0.0055201887,0.00007565136,0.00005490988,0.00022681811,0.0049617565,0.00064913905,0.0009717998,0.9362712,0.031796146,0.019313378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012249482,0.00017909633,0.01850508,0.00075365347,0.00019609742,0.0003410839,0.0147802485,0.0028319824,0.004676472,0.5450688,0.41228947,0.00025556565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03972205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06294362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057502568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011729528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04023702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3041063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413531799","doi":"10.64628/aam.wsegxdmwk","title":"Canada’s Genetic Non-Discrimination Act has only had a limited impact on the use of genetic information by life insurers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Genetic discrimination; Actuarial science; Genetic testing; Business; Internet privacy; Genetics; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.039260072851107254,"score_gpt":0.2725445132854513,"score_spread":0.23328444043434407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413531799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10258251,0.0049766186,0.002182252,0.2506971,0.0025884528,0.00044064544,0.012367432,0.000475937,0.623689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5065065,0.0031526245,0.0040688766,0.18630487,0.0006206775,0.00019825195,0.0026542912,0.0001429131,0.296351],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9783633,0.0014650354,0.00047499995,0.0011554251,0.013518488,0.0050228047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9458062,0.01819856,0.0019501437,0.0017984064,0.023777073,0.008469691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010518058,0.00051585905,0.00081289245,0.003396141,0.009239929,0.007175927,0.0035420442,0.009621131,0.017453553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034149762,0.0008782809,0.0016503839,0.0020912546,0.0039985115,0.001482414,0.002541731,0.006725572,0.001778963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044783665,0.00049999205,0.076498866,0.00045550615,0.00040801274,0.0010202066,0.0038303875,0.0012105632,0.0036307184,0.26598322,0.56231904,0.083695635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004112349,0.00025451934,0.21593142,0.00071325846,0.0005643501,0.00039875423,0.0026728348,0.0023556969,0.004086693,0.008534385,0.7637002,0.00037668002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9861335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99353033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06711985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06711985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23913614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48699087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413540783","doi":"10.64628/aap.tyae45tsd","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada is wrong to refuse to translate its pre-1970 decisions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Supreme Court Decisions; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02956892846037685,"score_gpt":0.327476425723971,"score_spread":0.29790749726359417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413540783","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02396752,0.0052153612,0.0024103676,0.6654624,0.020415805,0.00019728713,0.002411117,0.0004693371,0.2794508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1360682,0.0024005931,0.0034765734,0.5277442,0.001790208,0.00011399848,0.0004854715,0.00029881494,0.32762194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822813,0.0008691974,0.00057784416,0.0012339938,0.009591278,0.0054463297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9767943,0.0049156686,0.00040136036,0.0006213955,0.014544283,0.002722986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077743502,0.00083870714,0.0009858063,0.0034207464,0.024405668,0.012347125,0.0041851383,0.028683009,0.01025951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034020904,0.0010571565,0.0019551525,0.0034451103,0.0092355115,0.0029761756,0.0023727233,0.029548831,0.002078357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005828602,0.0000569,0.0014541914,0.000075832126,0.00006350778,0.00040561167,0.0020593572,0.0004596202,0.00036720815,0.23974916,0.7424162,0.012834162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010920022,0.000034966353,0.0057148635,0.00033464297,0.00016673324,0.00012448564,0.002483411,0.00072229514,0.0014823348,0.026955957,0.9616314,0.00023958283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9839579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9902559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9027234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09727662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2560555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7057946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413585640","doi":"10.64628/aam.pj6gsdwug","title":"Punishment vs. deportation: What we can learn from the case of the truck driver in the Humboldt Broncos bus crash","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Deportation; Crash; Truck; Punishment (psychology); Criminology; Aeronautics; Engineering; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Automotive engineering; Law; Social psychology; Operating system; Immigration","score_opus":0.030904834011231633,"score_gpt":0.30536616051980675,"score_spread":0.27446132650857513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413585640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52400976,0.020704648,0.004500253,0.3074369,0.00048398518,0.000041831914,0.00031533308,0.000012761785,0.14249453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98380196,0.005709847,0.00032461356,0.00534807,0.00044707963,0.000014004895,0.00006734304,0.000010336613,0.004276785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780136,0.00084567163,0.00009829764,0.00026510566,0.00029242106,0.00069721387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97368276,0.021239951,0.002240709,0.00075882854,0.0013203148,0.0007574595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00511363,0.00043090506,0.00084635156,0.0010987112,0.0044546938,0.0063814055,0.0020727925,0.010850382,0.010188871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027614472,0.00037424098,0.00048694632,0.0014230338,0.013330009,0.013978675,0.0024108766,0.008954383,0.00067241245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029771295,0.00051089865,0.03542015,0.00041820496,0.00012132059,0.004362771,0.02345996,0.003996582,0.0002409952,0.86011976,0.033190116,0.037861567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009866491,0.00008772594,0.02231206,0.0005992399,0.00007910215,0.00074360636,0.041617714,0.0030775515,0.00027745985,0.8980597,0.032959383,0.00008777891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028598128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04277128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9714019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040847533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039166296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056863368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413591586","doi":"10.64628/aam.kxugq7nwa","title":"Could a Roe v. Wade-style reversal of abortion rights happen in Canada?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Style (visual arts); Political science; History; Law; Pregnancy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.018759164361497185,"score_gpt":0.29173397028040593,"score_spread":0.27297480591890877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413591586","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27506992,0.002850041,0.0028220478,0.38488,0.0012773953,0.0003773452,0.0013664452,0.0001409062,0.33121595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.817147,0.0012751304,0.0017624545,0.10132921,0.00026352078,0.00007827787,0.00020304431,0.000049991027,0.07789143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99064445,0.001026625,0.00018941438,0.00083510677,0.0024961326,0.004808236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942729,0.0018538304,0.00035433378,0.00033407682,0.0020745904,0.0011103116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006949176,0.0002996166,0.0005620637,0.0011243129,0.014294948,0.0055753845,0.0025136769,0.012745037,0.009989124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022972474,0.00043131132,0.0008581014,0.0012696794,0.004236537,0.0020778528,0.0020188545,0.009674856,0.0005412589],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028750306,0.00015101416,0.03675079,0.00014754814,0.00020761833,0.001900796,0.007099999,0.0019626557,0.0018492279,0.7691448,0.14064133,0.039856765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009370135,0.00030186994,0.14812827,0.0005553022,0.00069383165,0.0009840081,0.0201689,0.011827949,0.0055471915,0.16711602,0.6430102,0.0007294202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9826957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99103034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052086577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052086577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14614418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37791634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413600467","doi":"10.64628/aai.6phtmxf5w","title":"Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife have bolstered conservative causes as he is poised to lead the Supreme Court rolling back more landmark rulings","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Landmark; Wife; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Cartography; Geography","score_opus":0.08462225352389136,"score_gpt":0.35862834934852267,"score_spread":0.2740060958246313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413600467","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031486325,0.0028244278,0.00971628,0.55086523,0.011249593,0.000057451383,0.00016483603,0.00025515372,0.3933808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5334716,0.0013805504,0.006249346,0.13360892,0.004152339,0.00006410553,0.00010128222,0.00048203036,0.32048985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904738,0.0027222002,0.00022513393,0.0010704533,0.0038465038,0.001661936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98158264,0.011559478,0.0008055203,0.0012150183,0.002647177,0.0021901315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008392643,0.00047885513,0.00073027506,0.002039117,0.017860696,0.016864097,0.0013583999,0.0100282775,0.011795839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040477317,0.000389205,0.00048822438,0.0017787818,0.014676385,0.004547221,0.0045495895,0.019459931,0.002315981],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002111372,0.000016054262,0.0006833523,0.000021336582,0.000015671885,0.00027372123,0.0068442686,0.00014159118,0.00019970242,0.8281294,0.15444219,0.009211503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002397857,0.000036000692,0.0026463051,0.00012072237,0.000030243662,0.00023494239,0.007696011,0.00051859673,0.0021497018,0.30006006,0.6863811,0.00010238435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03135107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10747139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03135107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006525621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007702514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06233716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413968468","doi":"10.64628/aam.y33s9jttc","title":"The B.C. Supreme Court’s recognition of Cowichan title is an invitation to enact transformative change","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Sociology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.1306106194371652,"score_gpt":0.36841918799336154,"score_spread":0.23780856855619634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413968468","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018199561,0.0023007896,0.006632963,0.52391136,0.014311185,0.00014527839,0.00044862684,0.00028181422,0.43376848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40764907,0.0014366483,0.011905025,0.25353503,0.0048491047,0.0004225312,0.00024084354,0.00022874441,0.31973305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99300367,0.001390922,0.00031566646,0.00095134566,0.0033679244,0.00097042165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891889,0.0058983737,0.000574133,0.0010916956,0.0023433608,0.00090356887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008601053,0.00037252792,0.0009928732,0.0007613363,0.008786793,0.010500852,0.0014225094,0.022452861,0.0107897315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028910533,0.00041717218,0.00062731834,0.0011878925,0.007892392,0.0029641646,0.0031375566,0.019959457,0.0027866396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026277774,0.00003317567,0.00030147348,0.000023580598,0.000010218548,0.00013955975,0.0006715979,0.00014355904,0.00047264845,0.8515333,0.14097415,0.005670411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000106666615,0.000058411817,0.0024632043,0.00017155896,0.00003121176,0.00015154369,0.00057558675,0.0018048681,0.0021296926,0.33321702,0.65919656,0.00009359014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04838254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06700486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9516175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007745544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018434176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09620184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414240189","doi":"10.22329/cjpp.v10i1.8450","title":"Ultimate Integrity: A Reformulation of Unlimited Liability","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Practical Philosophy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Dignity; Liability; Nobility; Strict liability; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.12485736454289896,"score_gpt":0.39207513681352024,"score_spread":0.26721777227062127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414240189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018838488,0.004708247,0.34478328,0.046814352,0.0014388401,0.00021889138,0.00014580085,0.00013528684,0.58291686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8885814,0.00281098,0.05210786,0.010082224,0.0018082906,0.0003978389,0.00009188325,0.0001570086,0.043962516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98113626,0.0063659768,0.00080715714,0.002318588,0.007135147,0.0022368545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98544806,0.0059878095,0.0010489898,0.0027197427,0.004098897,0.00069635134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01658918,0.00066955975,0.0008103908,0.0020645966,0.0061882376,0.0075400583,0.0032134478,0.0071092574,0.0058203903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027235506,0.00056139793,0.0014520101,0.0011125332,0.0368305,0.014395015,0.0069176257,0.01211348,0.0011573551],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013725692,0.0000016650495,0.000014709118,0.000004896929,9.3172525e-7,0.00001620497,0.0001562656,0.00012144494,0.000017215621,0.99875605,0.00027001818,0.0006392217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013116401,0.000013199371,0.00006815308,0.00006629586,0.000007497393,0.00007725673,0.00012391215,0.001079179,0.0001439277,0.97431064,0.02408104,0.000015776184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026476135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015419825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026476135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010670144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014483507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08773303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414379000","doi":"10.5149/northcarolina/9781469678535.003.0009","title":"My Bones Are a Property Bequeathed to Me","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Emigration; Politics; Personal property; Racism; White (mutation); Property (philosophy); Property rights","score_opus":0.039623799716263695,"score_gpt":0.29211523191091093,"score_spread":0.25249143219464726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414379000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015276964,0.009490293,0.0020573908,0.051495105,0.00515783,0.000040898463,0.00011374996,0.00013735736,0.91623044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08025487,0.0035178056,0.0007232559,0.006251107,0.0007584975,0.00002147944,0.000041277017,0.00011054628,0.90832114],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996619,0.00009801498,0.0000068457894,0.00004683515,0.00011855154,0.00006788865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996729,0.000078212244,0.000031943964,0.000029174596,0.00009353765,0.00009426517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045539797,0.00033262235,0.00026028097,0.0005377439,0.0057232277,0.003531601,0.00041875456,0.0011134301,0.04813074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010084666,0.00018767607,0.00022435091,0.00038750234,0.0044942712,0.004130291,0.0020282383,0.0036073597,0.013672228],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038540365,0.000068096764,0.000747487,0.00012781519,0.0000071719883,0.00061289605,0.036446113,0.000068145484,0.00074262754,0.2907362,0.6013716,0.069033265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024498722,0.000019321224,0.00034199795,0.00012617538,0.0000021566054,0.00034073985,0.0083678905,0.000027945845,0.000107462394,0.0066599078,0.9839999,0.00000412763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040361965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008910318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04813074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011318685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008995904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16101342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414427548","doi":"10.32388/jryxr5","title":"Review of: \"Reframing Housing Policy through Behavioral Public Law: Nudges, Ethics, and Regulatory Design\"","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Public policy; Government (linguistics); Public housing; Legislation","score_opus":0.1841965846472584,"score_gpt":0.4495732312931537,"score_spread":0.2653766466458953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414427548","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001232083,0.22474341,0.0034167801,0.61248636,0.08441774,0.00021684103,0.0006334174,0.00012448215,0.07272884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.054476697,0.5925827,0.0045528593,0.17359874,0.08038445,0.00048075628,0.0011672344,0.00023725783,0.09251932],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.989038,0.0034418378,0.00079839583,0.0006279364,0.005705745,0.00038796433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94007385,0.029992573,0.002579248,0.0017188905,0.024463328,0.0011720356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011484468,0.0005154777,0.0010469905,0.0039473413,0.0028027457,0.004559071,0.0024618614,0.005641794,0.01717583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060894385,0.0003320264,0.0005369894,0.0040086024,0.005585413,0.003936086,0.0027253053,0.003844344,0.0061901202],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008425854,0.0000142958515,0.00010376385,0.0022013772,0.000010988831,0.000054443317,0.00038279162,0.0001316076,0.00008145753,0.036711477,0.8651468,0.09515255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032252265,0.000008286539,0.00074750895,0.0031417892,0.000010790455,0.00005220474,0.00034906555,0.0000888807,0.00007136569,0.0053121247,0.9902036,0.00001110809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01801573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033508547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01801573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063099144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024043674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060736418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414620344","doi":"10.1017/s135232522510075x","title":"Can We Legally Revise the Highest Legal Rule?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"University of Wisconsin-Madison","keywords":"Legal realism; Field (mathematics); Legal ethics; Legal research; Rule of law; Legal profession; Empirical legal studies","score_opus":0.010976192213895092,"score_gpt":0.28737852891891985,"score_spread":0.2764023367050248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414620344","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09225965,0.0042406954,0.21094179,0.2036069,0.0028412892,0.00018605459,0.00014816034,0.00046697608,0.4853085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9511037,0.0007186653,0.028192699,0.010186724,0.0005378039,0.00007421301,0.000050611863,0.00012534109,0.009010348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801998,0.009082148,0.0010768329,0.0038654641,0.0037048236,0.0020708826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9633795,0.018594053,0.0027387633,0.008010671,0.0059963916,0.0012805539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026457077,0.00036310568,0.0010113415,0.002135836,0.0060353843,0.011610428,0.0035054102,0.0072052428,0.0070930123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064199485,0.00054674374,0.0010261984,0.0009843699,0.043157246,0.017248467,0.0054636104,0.011320685,0.0013298976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005901714,0.000010839747,0.00015661404,0.00001781696,0.00000726751,0.000038258593,0.0007094966,0.00032733596,0.00007892002,0.9941789,0.001258245,0.0032103686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011876847,0.0000068901672,0.000116759606,0.000051403218,0.000007931169,0.000023148728,0.00036860612,0.0010371296,0.0001991487,0.98396605,0.014194103,0.000016910843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008308609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070972587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026457077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065800464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007796282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13992006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414957244","doi":"10.21991/cf29495","title":"Out of the Shadows: Responsive Judicial Review and the Resurgence of the Notwithstanding Clause","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Legitimacy; Judicial activism; Charter; Judicial independence; Democratic legitimacy; Order (exchange); Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.017971527778015053,"score_gpt":0.301501207142136,"score_spread":0.283529679364121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414957244","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10356767,0.012797868,0.029316535,0.48230037,0.0022525035,0.0001790948,0.00006157876,0.00019667354,0.36932763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91647893,0.0016508682,0.0030772528,0.05422053,0.0008764451,0.00005830634,0.000014192228,0.000059780927,0.023563737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96185637,0.017522108,0.0006822588,0.0031094702,0.012261988,0.0045678127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95505834,0.033322833,0.0024789185,0.0019357587,0.0055311467,0.0016730436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035510954,0.00024584532,0.0004606085,0.0017549628,0.011760684,0.013154774,0.0024178007,0.01041163,0.003535243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0711201,0.0003539287,0.00047602307,0.001229906,0.02588726,0.0072705555,0.005337008,0.010860341,0.0004489686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002206464,0.000016454382,0.00052629324,0.000033434604,0.000012143941,0.00039864858,0.008945935,0.0003158015,0.0005947102,0.9509967,0.017090624,0.021047212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012697268,0.00008553247,0.0034949072,0.00035797607,0.00007570288,0.00054447836,0.0124988975,0.002629855,0.003106206,0.5757745,0.40112707,0.00017796144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09277297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.111581005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09277297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022434328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032529235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18780214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417326230","doi":"10.1515/9781773856698-012","title":"10 “I am Not Going Back to Canada:” The Law Comes for Buck","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Action (physics); Term (time)","score_opus":0.029548226123193994,"score_gpt":0.22369446673483237,"score_spread":0.19414624061163838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417326230","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028958635,0.010387205,0.0009282179,0.21201055,0.0047677783,0.000063143554,0.00048405005,0.00013831955,0.7683249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029403768,0.0017821314,0.0004778915,0.09537314,0.00030161414,0.000036933485,0.0000980133,0.00011097342,0.87241554],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728525,0.00026138424,0.000048604346,0.00031574848,0.0009655603,0.001123375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979506,0.0003410249,0.000045005865,0.00008172235,0.0011323147,0.0004493553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015661691,0.000643474,0.00048248534,0.0012138381,0.019176146,0.014147944,0.0018308442,0.0113508785,0.044715077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060455417,0.0006232285,0.00047961486,0.0018365695,0.008342999,0.005438963,0.0021337606,0.01273148,0.008119553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009819733,0.0000114496415,0.00034036572,0.000027523949,0.0000039770016,0.00007069628,0.0014807701,0.00006172983,0.00006711216,0.25693822,0.7308625,0.010125791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005929336,0.0000037578618,0.0006240038,0.00010034338,0.000006346707,0.000026191092,0.0020040611,0.000062342304,0.00010483943,0.014788073,0.98225003,0.000024150535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96296203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.981845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044715077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042638384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08232809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30936456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W52213294","doi":"","title":"A History of Gender Variance in Pre-20th Century Anglo-American Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas journal of women and the law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Politics; Supreme court; Law; State (computer science); Battle; Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.014410756946399619,"score_gpt":0.25890060571800777,"score_spread":0.24448984877160815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W52213294","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11519843,0.06800867,0.0015453985,0.06670086,0.0026227452,0.000027660197,0.00012263379,0.000039904786,0.74573374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89978015,0.013196384,0.00045798038,0.013224182,0.0014484465,0.000042791933,0.00004779224,0.000045077104,0.071757175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825245,0.0007331734,0.000042522977,0.00021641355,0.00030828902,0.0004471139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986524,0.00072860444,0.000118887525,0.00006596232,0.00025031282,0.00018377978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023263597,0.00022174513,0.00021483672,0.0019089888,0.010766311,0.004924644,0.0005876637,0.0018927762,0.006744932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002201815,0.00017007922,0.0001508114,0.0018426051,0.017428646,0.0029717854,0.0022995532,0.00437537,0.0005183494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011525717,0.000030534535,0.0013605226,0.000026683083,0.0000020606733,0.00015561262,0.06749042,0.000019390689,0.000068974296,0.89328283,0.014054542,0.023496995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004710155,0.000023161874,0.0065914313,0.00034957533,0.0000041312896,0.0002025886,0.021480836,0.000079118065,0.00014257505,0.05309352,0.91801167,0.00001658294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04859048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08077577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04859048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011879248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004306297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096615314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W55417016","doi":"","title":"Come Shale Away: Navigating the \"Business Friendliness\" of Regulatory Environments in the Marcellus Shale and Albertan Oil Sands","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oil sands; Oil shale; Unconventional oil; Shale oil; Petroleum; Steam-assisted gravity drainage; Investment (military); Appeal; Natural gas; State (computer science); Synthetic crude; Politics; Economy; Business; Political science; Asphalt; Law; Geology; Engineering; Economics; Geography; Archaeology; Waste management","score_opus":0.011095980493860291,"score_gpt":0.2526587822495339,"score_spread":0.24156280175567363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W55417016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5094557,0.0016282124,0.0029184904,0.13102569,0.0001236944,0.00005419569,0.000048984755,0.000053612435,0.35469136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779259,0.00039461118,0.0005329889,0.0077586602,0.000024412193,0.000010797076,0.0000135251685,0.000011726376,0.013327398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943684,0.002057857,0.000055731995,0.00034665276,0.0012458732,0.0019255201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99353784,0.0036770187,0.00059336773,0.00016972715,0.0009959231,0.0010260692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059490586,0.00017072067,0.00020310139,0.00094042945,0.027214086,0.016050227,0.0017824474,0.0050206855,0.003279719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008889469,0.00025656255,0.00024094546,0.0011224033,0.027513638,0.0031673308,0.0033610493,0.0048441775,0.00018700658],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007054315,0.00008999884,0.024908517,0.00004873062,0.000017653809,0.0012439025,0.18581504,0.00091486593,0.0013351446,0.73612154,0.025849177,0.023584789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053465053,0.000067221816,0.040242363,0.0003212275,0.000059576643,0.00022177753,0.48974416,0.0018378228,0.0017706942,0.09288907,0.37266147,0.0001311392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8263661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9412507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17363387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042769525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051811583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34931284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W566458213","doi":"10.29173/alr29","title":"Re-defining Privity of Contract: &lt;i&gt;Brown v. Belleville (City)&lt;/i&gt;","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privity of contract; Business; Exclusion clause; Contract management; Marketing","score_opus":0.04016965325434883,"score_gpt":0.3079388001415848,"score_spread":0.26776914688723596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W566458213","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011053281,0.009951523,0.0036225705,0.4406471,0.0023991386,0.00016148422,0.0010919053,0.00014208266,0.5309308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28967032,0.0041099396,0.0036773952,0.47721812,0.0015325082,0.00028560756,0.0005662364,0.00017040214,0.22276947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860903,0.0023958082,0.00056838285,0.0016996053,0.0056847455,0.0035611582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98616356,0.0063870302,0.00067164615,0.0012248709,0.004331278,0.0012216337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011362384,0.00057297375,0.00066328223,0.0014687546,0.012505041,0.011585403,0.0040183216,0.02684045,0.012246834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025896147,0.00074521004,0.0011320555,0.0018010485,0.014650054,0.005943714,0.004002319,0.019105708,0.0020998109],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019880008,0.000012697931,0.00072197407,0.00006398846,0.000007820372,0.00018089623,0.0020435879,0.000119212156,0.00026238998,0.7284932,0.26402283,0.0040515168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009978006,0.00003239662,0.006552245,0.0008492884,0.00006358176,0.00026788306,0.004205212,0.0005656646,0.0009172742,0.12553371,0.8607735,0.00013948858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6597115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82278746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6597115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031286944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07397106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6845851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W58102176","doi":"","title":"Memorandum of Argument, Supreme Court of Canada, in re James R. Demers","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholars Crossing (Liberty University)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Argument (complex analysis); Memorandum; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.019228257440710154,"score_gpt":0.24382944643619522,"score_spread":0.22460118899548506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W58102176","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002152809,0.029626312,0.00048008322,0.83462656,0.07214787,0.00014691547,0.0029502597,0.00012566538,0.057743512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03353768,0.0131919775,0.00110744,0.6377377,0.021680595,0.00033736895,0.0009027196,0.00020930302,0.29129517],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958611,0.00032296308,0.00027666366,0.0006876576,0.0019800102,0.00087165536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994848,0.0017270923,0.00018786758,0.00016928112,0.0025218197,0.0005459305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037343025,0.0012343522,0.0013965068,0.0023532405,0.02147695,0.010801322,0.004214533,0.028074786,0.011932965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017218092,0.0013468907,0.0016803656,0.0026848349,0.0055548167,0.003177118,0.0023245963,0.026127059,0.0038171473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013150779,0.0000067732763,0.00009999944,0.000017711873,0.0000073831043,0.00008110018,0.00017309574,0.000035331523,0.000053862066,0.005191795,0.99291116,0.0014085576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048806956,0.0000066733887,0.002050807,0.00032212623,0.000037511134,0.00004067429,0.0006468228,0.00012866403,0.0002526542,0.0052919392,0.9911157,0.000057558853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8781193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9515973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12188071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048383996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058363408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3510521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W581529536","doi":"","title":"The law of privacy in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Carswell eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.023419802582677774,"score_gpt":0.23669831746089617,"score_spread":0.2132785148782184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W581529536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007758724,0.024020867,0.0018386411,0.06163447,0.0010375035,0.00007648805,0.00046094382,0.000072860996,0.90309954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27188298,0.02082912,0.0020850205,0.017955713,0.00048711587,0.000098940094,0.00022100461,0.00013980108,0.6863003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995479,0.0004149692,0.000079470934,0.00034572606,0.0021650526,0.0015157128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997758,0.0004987961,0.00006230247,0.000096201366,0.0011359277,0.00044887478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014886163,0.00073595496,0.00071761553,0.0020269386,0.019673996,0.013729963,0.002208538,0.006813644,0.014895907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069926386,0.000846949,0.0005242814,0.0049102707,0.012245456,0.003325962,0.0021647278,0.008410751,0.0011786546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074194913,0.00001036124,0.00028033,0.000026597196,0.0000055180426,0.00006898682,0.0013357245,0.0005178593,0.000030728046,0.9016305,0.08696526,0.009120711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018619698,0.000008624794,0.0019992795,0.00026761388,0.000022146556,0.00006792472,0.0025617634,0.0011721713,0.00011900236,0.19337487,0.8003169,0.00007103096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99640584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16560943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16560943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28082246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9677748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W584632781","doi":"","title":"Same-Sex Relationships: From 'Odious Crime' to 'Gay Marriage'","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Eleventh; General partnership; Political science; Lesbian; Criminology; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.051808084798144825,"score_gpt":0.30909351611420016,"score_spread":0.25728543131605536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W584632781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011891778,0.023035966,0.0009474547,0.041578136,0.0034399892,0.000082258885,0.00007527099,0.00003423708,0.9189149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4601905,0.036438856,0.0011743478,0.03562632,0.0020733108,0.00025671956,0.00019584078,0.00011205231,0.463932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987883,0.0005422228,0.00004335152,0.0000997366,0.0003025508,0.00022388579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995189,0.00014450628,0.00005769751,0.000042067484,0.0000972947,0.00013960063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007306102,0.0004031826,0.0003512018,0.0008957403,0.0073435945,0.006160257,0.0007300472,0.0026796053,0.0061635445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021443844,0.00032781172,0.00024107828,0.0010709566,0.010472114,0.0045935255,0.0042597516,0.0067010443,0.0011035873],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000740042,0.00007179485,0.0006609266,0.000077428376,0.0000022552256,0.0002480235,0.05582491,0.000090400084,0.00005735016,0.76159304,0.14110233,0.040264085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008854078,0.000033342938,0.0049754353,0.0007770419,0.0000070241467,0.0007446623,0.07250066,0.00012209805,0.00012714072,0.08471384,0.8359711,0.000018822293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041224994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09656693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041224994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037266482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009780592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081970036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W598803545","doi":"","title":"The Case for a U.S. Privacy Commissioner: A Canadian Commissioner’s Perspective, 19 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 1 (2000)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Political science; Law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03197506263777512,"score_gpt":0.31079550972087383,"score_spread":0.2788204470830987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W598803545","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005346506,0.01615485,0.0018694992,0.7560938,0.0015384688,0.000072044655,0.0002561728,0.000045237026,0.21862341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3470063,0.01494578,0.004303984,0.5153583,0.0013530939,0.0001878643,0.00018083936,0.00016131207,0.11650248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9657737,0.0067326506,0.00082105974,0.0031022425,0.010201194,0.013369218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97512674,0.009810413,0.00091588806,0.00087828963,0.009028266,0.0042404756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023402274,0.00094860006,0.0010310659,0.004579682,0.059460185,0.0366669,0.0059388787,0.051273882,0.010806382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05037514,0.0014864207,0.0018543678,0.006498741,0.0424012,0.01541766,0.0065353904,0.026817475,0.0013362156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012312655,0.000020834901,0.00064953585,0.000035152945,0.000010167239,0.00017708128,0.0038182642,0.00016484049,0.000049458282,0.85384417,0.13711679,0.0041013644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008343759,0.000026373298,0.0048112487,0.0010062905,0.00009706651,0.00032216765,0.014512474,0.0017010566,0.00034057227,0.22478378,0.7520403,0.00027525373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9767173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9768901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14663474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14663474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2713283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98978275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W603411450","doi":"","title":"Dirty Puddles and Safety Valves: The Path from Fact to Remedy in \"Canada (A.G.) v. PHS Community Services Society\"","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Path (computing); Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Operating system","score_opus":0.012049421718789442,"score_gpt":0.2346356043731855,"score_spread":0.22258618265439606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W603411450","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14639585,0.00878766,0.003995774,0.49834514,0.00093535497,0.00026290547,0.0005349392,0.000077362056,0.34066498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.873199,0.0023317935,0.001534718,0.067504026,0.00021770106,0.000076685414,0.00006926391,0.000037483893,0.05502939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868325,0.0030994883,0.00036648766,0.0010884819,0.0038035146,0.004809545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927424,0.0038157366,0.00056577724,0.00025590966,0.00179152,0.00082857424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009774516,0.00036964583,0.00050825824,0.001373161,0.03388837,0.014643288,0.004047762,0.023362415,0.004424892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019857071,0.00060350343,0.00069130724,0.0017818775,0.02832484,0.006327537,0.004895832,0.017353566,0.00021973035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016884502,0.000025154404,0.0013523501,0.000045739005,0.000008763868,0.00037726967,0.022214811,0.00026636987,0.00011243444,0.93507934,0.034769446,0.005731453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013777179,0.000077492565,0.015766315,0.0011910192,0.00017541151,0.00045461112,0.10160483,0.0024170156,0.0017746413,0.30140436,0.5746953,0.00030120832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.964653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9863906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92318004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07681996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20570977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5573704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W60908620","doi":"","title":"The Illusory Rights of Marvin v. Marvin for the Same-Sex Couple versus the Preferable Canadian Alternative--M. v. H.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"California western law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Same sex; Law and economics; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.06367659331093882,"score_gpt":0.308886387124464,"score_spread":0.24520979381352515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W60908620","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039889555,0.0032448974,0.0032314574,0.10413704,0.0006871672,0.00011342828,0.00047416546,0.000043584816,0.84817874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8493936,0.0011371811,0.0023278065,0.03403426,0.0002410424,0.00008653305,0.000103249346,0.0000386751,0.11263759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924138,0.0014119475,0.0001948444,0.00061792554,0.0031904175,0.0021709749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952011,0.0019528015,0.00019794462,0.00044012492,0.0016974956,0.00051061984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006777534,0.00034010512,0.00050560135,0.0010108376,0.012196873,0.0062238663,0.0021268204,0.012016059,0.010181579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01764753,0.00048434053,0.0006116483,0.00096497685,0.009037041,0.0024938982,0.0022175247,0.00797165,0.0009351091],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030904233,0.000008782953,0.00045250717,0.00001992895,0.00000581478,0.00007862758,0.0014322288,0.000054883203,0.00021467569,0.9740262,0.02018177,0.0034936029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016080892,0.00007147861,0.009054078,0.0005254981,0.00016895887,0.0004772315,0.0068043857,0.0013333639,0.0021284358,0.44007564,0.53903824,0.0001619044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66890985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8578485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33109015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013980903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0338025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W61967472","doi":"","title":"Everything You Need to Know About Health And Safety Law In Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ASSE Professional Development Conference and Exhibition","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Need to know; Law; Business; Political science; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.01874076437711888,"score_gpt":0.2935272172979801,"score_spread":0.27478645292086123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W61967472","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0896372,0.01106794,0.0004240424,0.7716017,0.0021835996,0.00013345282,0.001017898,0.0000751291,0.12385902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.635476,0.016629308,0.0014035455,0.15585203,0.0006537796,0.00009415076,0.00064335956,0.00010470084,0.18914309],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903313,0.00073475624,0.000272099,0.00045310898,0.0036164194,0.004592325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.971095,0.004249554,0.00078247406,0.00021372411,0.011903693,0.011755483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039199144,0.00032464007,0.0007413257,0.0026727049,0.041963235,0.012445058,0.0029801656,0.009900775,0.019514963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015636675,0.0009111133,0.00080940756,0.004000103,0.008101758,0.0034032774,0.003322878,0.013678396,0.0008636774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010454885,0.0003833553,0.043066688,0.00047390413,0.00012927738,0.0018834512,0.027163316,0.0021379169,0.0006942591,0.12835136,0.71154034,0.08407154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073373725,0.000066394314,0.100001305,0.0009130746,0.00010171429,0.00030626898,0.06649503,0.0013632195,0.00048221255,0.011232232,0.8186166,0.00034853266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99921083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99972063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29672354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.29672354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.58401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.815701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W623305902","doi":"","title":"Tort's Response to Surrogate Motherhood: Providing Surrogates with a Remedy for Breached Agreements","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Compensation (psychology); Honour; Law; Raising (metalworking); Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Liability; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.011760872157326581,"score_gpt":0.2784499502813309,"score_spread":0.26668907812400433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W623305902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17946187,0.003452318,0.023505177,0.20568246,0.0016976916,0.0003430584,0.00011234853,0.00024542768,0.5854996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91385853,0.0010328136,0.0045423866,0.027166378,0.00033880305,0.00009278937,0.000033625896,0.000042919633,0.05289173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9763533,0.008051077,0.0009910712,0.0018728699,0.007730748,0.005000869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885795,0.006532746,0.000981114,0.0011229437,0.0020290492,0.00075463456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020680046,0.0004564027,0.00073055277,0.0012742002,0.013410112,0.007414484,0.0037658538,0.02244034,0.003915004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043986376,0.0005591164,0.0009982245,0.0009768752,0.018321583,0.0035394514,0.0064538666,0.011812665,0.0005873148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003192999,0.000033669487,0.0015318454,0.000030807383,0.000013440561,0.002044895,0.014432351,0.0005697142,0.0006684764,0.9623294,0.010985257,0.007328206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017560506,0.00031417952,0.00969659,0.0010069434,0.00021947242,0.005288658,0.041928597,0.007825046,0.003362501,0.31767648,0.61213315,0.00037284955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25672358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29082888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25672358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016013617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03545307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5104586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W63491074","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1013","title":"Family Arbitration: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Two step; Computer science; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Applied mathematics","score_opus":0.03947905874857221,"score_gpt":0.35346821104787823,"score_spread":0.313989152299306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W63491074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08952441,0.018484902,0.03262624,0.26214448,0.0016198031,0.0002515334,0.00019854144,0.00015296962,0.5949971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8296007,0.0042531746,0.007727066,0.008018779,0.00023751424,0.00008116033,0.000041862506,0.000054780663,0.14998496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915105,0.0026428942,0.0002542673,0.0010148322,0.0029018587,0.0016757047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99643767,0.000776999,0.00039859474,0.00047827858,0.0011337195,0.0007747222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006011816,0.00034379802,0.00048235705,0.0008769367,0.011664577,0.007678127,0.001566134,0.003586251,0.011761326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010257825,0.00039674272,0.00050833455,0.0011277061,0.015683718,0.005314423,0.005867188,0.0036779286,0.0009988877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036040034,0.000017298631,0.0029760052,0.000101477024,0.0000147598985,0.0003272652,0.018355628,0.00032400663,0.00026775055,0.92324907,0.014582851,0.03974778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004705416,0.000056250334,0.009639601,0.0006308958,0.000038588347,0.00037899893,0.016824704,0.0012789362,0.0008621209,0.14508824,0.82508016,0.00007450394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.631138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72968453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.631138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042340223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06521227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7420685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W646098464","doi":"","title":"Canadian Same Sex Relationship Recognition Struggles and the Contradictory Nature of Legal Victories","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.015473953943370993,"score_gpt":0.29283572922781415,"score_spread":0.27736177528444317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W646098464","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15851812,0.008102232,0.001214097,0.24032867,0.0009393857,0.000072778115,0.00018725838,0.000058069276,0.59057933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9503475,0.0033558854,0.00065439276,0.013484887,0.00012991195,0.000029912273,0.0000633847,0.00004044391,0.031893574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831192,0.002435675,0.00026804244,0.0015040508,0.0063198893,0.0063531892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916393,0.0020896615,0.0007382837,0.0002753904,0.0024613412,0.0027961624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070139905,0.00048824557,0.00074969535,0.004200518,0.071417555,0.01727223,0.0033890102,0.0064244857,0.01143515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020427214,0.00057015294,0.0004928281,0.0062567485,0.038703557,0.005635134,0.008681795,0.009516074,0.00046556507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021835373,0.000020348378,0.0032448717,0.00006334431,0.000016522145,0.00062515703,0.102377675,0.00015715143,0.00019603784,0.8258948,0.049978808,0.017403448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000346213,0.000033026263,0.022645071,0.00042311248,0.00004795802,0.0004410386,0.3352593,0.0006422737,0.00048466222,0.106646806,0.533064,0.00027809935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9794627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99170977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15742645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15742645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1340743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9772659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6886020401","doi":"10.14288/1.0431101","title":"Climate discourse polluted : a cumulative effects analysis of the fossil fuel industry’s tactics to influence public discourse","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Fossil fuel; Leverage (statistics); Enforcement; Politics; Discourse analysis; Public policy; Culture theory","score_opus":0.02454525562120211,"score_gpt":0.33943100480322264,"score_spread":0.3148857491820205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6886020401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6799604,0.002122306,0.012149993,0.008117371,0.0001564594,0.00021408401,0.0003404766,0.00009830585,0.29684058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937133,0.0005253026,0.0012452597,0.00045634186,0.00007358139,0.00009448434,0.00006300596,0.00007642525,0.0037522947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.991771,0.0044547785,0.00019433639,0.0007621871,0.0019704532,0.0008471944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9545417,0.036644634,0.0029697889,0.0022985283,0.0027872364,0.0007579843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009249349,0.00044598724,0.0007074572,0.005367803,0.006216568,0.013809228,0.0011348267,0.0017572289,0.009798286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028184552,0.0004154896,0.0010246577,0.0037629965,0.013288554,0.0071295956,0.0076268744,0.0038431135,0.0005046187],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035846457,0.00039909568,0.048016198,0.0004598025,0.00029179954,0.00062497426,0.29164168,0.0034311197,0.0021399134,0.6059259,0.0034981149,0.043212928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024585254,0.00078935403,0.15377194,0.0012817106,0.0016244646,0.00030597104,0.37394902,0.013183103,0.0073934854,0.26562312,0.18157047,0.00026149862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016422715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0119259395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016422715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01014616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049455445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07361585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6903963152","doi":"10.13140/rg.2.2.35620.88969","title":"GRANDPARENTAL ACCESS TO GRANDCHILDREN -- A CASE COMMENT-- SIMMONS v. SIMMONS -- NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Nova scotia; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.06017104361776191,"score_gpt":0.3832810410472541,"score_spread":0.32310999742949215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6903963152","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17420217,0.003162925,0.00068598444,0.50654584,0.0024614073,0.00011704179,0.000914912,0.00009077618,0.31181893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6227248,0.0021094116,0.0005404699,0.23381737,0.0008636582,0.0000988149,0.00020868184,0.0000398037,0.13959706],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880755,0.00019148308,0.00004615019,0.000159238,0.00025741002,0.0005381601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728537,0.0012094532,0.00015903974,0.00011334504,0.0005095041,0.0007232182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015134246,0.00028501236,0.00034318073,0.0005266134,0.0103100035,0.0024161818,0.0013383293,0.0081567075,0.012490429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005802722,0.0004940124,0.0005757375,0.00056973734,0.0022160902,0.0008392211,0.0016841383,0.007606629,0.0013022121],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015877894,0.00008539463,0.05383903,0.00016890361,0.00004683097,0.016956937,0.020756623,0.0002403721,0.0022061446,0.21490295,0.6743918,0.016246215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026437783,0.00016814045,0.14747779,0.0013304951,0.00022240328,0.009373776,0.029899016,0.0007783928,0.0031982719,0.014533174,0.7926013,0.0001529499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.517672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8362564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.482328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006863271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018024832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97033703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6944112252","doi":"10.17613/46q0-d881","title":"The Development of Medical Marihuana Law in Canada and its Effect on Michigan Marihuana Statutes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Humanities Commons CORE (Modern Language Association / Columbia University)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; State (computer science); Legislation; Statute of limitations; State law","score_opus":0.02126222148385505,"score_gpt":0.24455150169706902,"score_spread":0.22328928021321398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6944112252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3917841,0.011266204,0.0011984905,0.21094929,0.00035560862,0.0001640739,0.0026345414,0.00010239072,0.38154525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94412994,0.0049957633,0.0008097348,0.008883504,0.00011998759,0.000045661054,0.00038004332,0.000033687556,0.040601674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957053,0.00036342235,0.00008346399,0.00021410575,0.0020637824,0.0015699927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99099404,0.0016992479,0.0006678184,0.00011876908,0.004470601,0.0020495025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00197241,0.00021527759,0.00023958998,0.0031832021,0.0122276405,0.006130801,0.002063904,0.002456517,0.01122826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013652545,0.0004185957,0.0005020296,0.003820611,0.0049271304,0.0014964752,0.0026018745,0.0042981897,0.00030417624],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001634016,0.0001872712,0.11845426,0.0001356907,0.00013173837,0.0006856808,0.00703159,0.001945161,0.001173813,0.68209934,0.11980563,0.068186305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010789184,0.00015093976,0.6188079,0.00091270753,0.00027391702,0.00028775053,0.017553812,0.005044944,0.0023441825,0.025196273,0.32909393,0.00022570252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99463177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99851984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1305199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1305199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23237094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9469926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6949692895","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4144345","title":"ON~PUTLOCKERZ'S.!! WATCH 1917 (2019) ONLINE FREE FULL HD 123MOVIES kol","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Sign (mathematics); Adversary; Box office; Movie theater","score_opus":0.052021988481198544,"score_gpt":0.2781331971404015,"score_spread":0.22611120865920298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6949692895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003754794,0.00020010008,0.00052575703,0.00048776172,0.00092285726,0.00008043668,0.003487921,0.0037772162,0.99014246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014286857,0.00015617235,0.0003052354,0.00022580044,0.0000859349,0.000031021355,0.0016518504,0.0019348883,0.99418044],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998363,0.000010707578,0.000004795178,0.000029122735,0.00007277037,0.000046182136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994948,0.000045920722,0.000012252925,0.00006449788,0.00020821484,0.00017422454],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021175205,0.0009440783,0.00051168766,0.0010354359,0.002324968,0.0037535517,0.0009652992,0.0011828971,0.94546384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012171946,0.00052199565,0.0006231067,0.0007723961,0.00040913178,0.0036405346,0.0033513901,0.00181277,0.8650477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002644218,0.000010963445,0.000057000187,0.000054680946,0.0000015040866,0.000029781246,0.00006875003,0.000013919625,0.00017298416,0.0011575536,0.97563237,0.02277404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004805421,0.0000063267535,0.00030189948,0.000035662244,0.0000014986969,0.0000346191,0.000097966615,0.000025239648,0.00012510229,0.00019006363,0.99917245,0.0000044585818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077027474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020663269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054536164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008451609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004900292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07778925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980170452","doi":"","title":"Beetle 96 with Binyamin Geva Border Style 126 [Hebrew]","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Internet Archive (Internet Archive)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Honour; Hebrew; Term (time)","score_opus":0.010178201257656233,"score_gpt":0.27497932793764807,"score_spread":0.26480112667999184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980170452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008108634,0.01033904,0.0011759957,0.007643416,0.0065853395,0.00004467121,0.0013397136,0.00028167776,0.9717792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005597424,0.0016584871,0.00027530067,0.0009820764,0.00055887084,0.000028272281,0.0002795515,0.00018290474,0.9904372],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960345,0.00009097595,0.000029117145,0.000099068326,0.000112279035,0.0000652148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968743,0.00007285389,0.00002311507,0.000056765075,0.00010742695,0.00005242157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006519979,0.0008063294,0.0006151089,0.0014185342,0.0036837328,0.0048354706,0.00058065203,0.00221542,0.20909098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015257043,0.00039574,0.00027283322,0.0021219593,0.0012320863,0.0018605863,0.0012101895,0.0026977884,0.108176254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017001184,0.000009641664,0.000059584825,0.000029605975,0.0000025489314,0.000027062413,0.00013564607,0.00005348326,0.00008417027,0.047961168,0.93037057,0.021249577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027446004,0.000003904444,0.00031073598,0.00005049183,0.0000010583809,0.000019290492,0.000058206435,0.00003383931,0.0000585558,0.0033372715,0.99611926,0.000004634617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043852367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.080413185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20909098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033569564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014080068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.699479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980241114","doi":"","title":"Beyond \"Restoration of Honor\": Compensating Veterans for the Psychological Injuries of the Gay and Transgender Bans","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Compensation (psychology); Sexual orientation; Stressor; Transgender; Veterans Affairs; Suicide prevention; Occupational safety and health; Identity (music)","score_opus":0.040300426216995915,"score_gpt":0.3204818410064792,"score_spread":0.2801814147894833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980241114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.533987,0.0047012633,0.03155272,0.23333938,0.0032409646,0.00021843261,0.00017808103,0.00016947523,0.19261266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9659629,0.0023393594,0.0059392345,0.0149184875,0.0006904995,0.00006423454,0.000059871636,0.0000252586,0.010000241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837875,0.0008175956,0.00006187934,0.000102375176,0.00031466334,0.00032473885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846625,0.0007283672,0.00032009228,0.000119804725,0.00016482847,0.00020072282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001917459,0.00019449854,0.00016869667,0.0006569001,0.0040736995,0.0037932608,0.0010108597,0.0020858988,0.0039401692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061515984,0.00009216564,0.0002958928,0.00046753854,0.0034819432,0.0030879006,0.0030471613,0.0035291805,0.0003029881],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097126416,0.0004674001,0.03582949,0.0003080535,0.000024688105,0.0008676992,0.03569191,0.0020223635,0.0023255905,0.5152564,0.036486566,0.37062272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042764605,0.00058245147,0.058610093,0.0016000218,0.0000580832,0.0017692209,0.16558158,0.007170879,0.007929926,0.2595575,0.49694663,0.00015085377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006795066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018934598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006795066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015282546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005061415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013511062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981300162","doi":"","title":"1997 Economic Census: Transportation: 1997 Commodity Flow Survey: Remainder of Washington","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Rosa P: A digital library for transportation research (United States Department of Transportation)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metropolitan area; Commodity; Census; Remainder; Population; General partnership; Survey data collection; Principal (computer security); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.044313904194396805,"score_gpt":0.3154628959810611,"score_spread":0.2711489917866643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981300162","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012813865,0.0008186799,0.0005122765,0.0009917024,0.0004982277,0.00045405506,0.96371585,0.00026148534,0.03146624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0052990844,0.0049307826,0.002087171,0.0005825958,0.00013751065,0.0017480501,0.94241583,0.0002025374,0.0425965],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910164,0.000112118905,0.000113907976,0.00015024144,0.0004044239,0.00011775279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759644,0.00017552746,0.0002269279,0.00013836402,0.0017652815,0.00009741004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009947333,0.001720969,0.00096428714,0.0038146388,0.0007568063,0.0020669175,0.0016612042,0.0010690246,0.062448174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038894447,0.0006616038,0.00042721626,0.012926483,0.00028096564,0.0019505306,0.00086217886,0.0021625236,0.07104065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024345349,0.000026797179,0.0014932583,0.00017910753,0.0000105717945,0.000019896472,0.000039088773,0.000103377235,0.000030610056,0.00077911204,0.98950803,0.0077858097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050238854,0.000015689777,0.015832353,0.00044393132,0.000017845556,0.0000365053,0.00034782465,0.00023127883,0.00012516386,0.00046293522,0.982417,0.000019358147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13840342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07537167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13840342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032284157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007965329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27519566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981538359","doi":"","title":"Entre formalisme et intimisme: «Elle était belle comme une idée» de Normand de Bellefeuille","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Formalism (music); Chose; Compromise; Poetry","score_opus":0.005256073949682322,"score_gpt":0.18154415616071465,"score_spread":0.17628808221103232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981538359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048707254,0.010219545,0.009892493,0.05960923,0.0012978831,0.000048518676,0.000073159565,0.00013488841,0.870017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8293182,0.0033056964,0.0028481018,0.0040722443,0.0001568127,0.000043918582,0.00003209232,0.00011223048,0.16011065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711704,0.0014212404,0.000036228463,0.00025945902,0.00081265776,0.00035331046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983576,0.00077113655,0.00009590549,0.00011620689,0.00037910126,0.00028007262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027234566,0.00045464712,0.0002503199,0.0010360754,0.015878098,0.014249754,0.0007640488,0.0015693443,0.0052353367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035807176,0.00017895663,0.00027930463,0.0016483206,0.037650853,0.0032939045,0.0027255996,0.004590511,0.0004707912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021411506,0.000013061632,0.0002870812,0.000026227897,0.0000022540955,0.00013818225,0.042906865,0.000084861524,0.00015139834,0.93141216,0.014193137,0.010763256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017281742,0.000013190306,0.001693459,0.00020067322,0.000006821357,0.00030740755,0.048621528,0.00042923284,0.00045071114,0.089046195,0.85917836,0.00003515906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72271985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.734422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72271985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04502152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03171328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55782616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6984940627","doi":"","title":"Toronto, Ohio","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); New england; Government (linguistics); Portrait","score_opus":0.01013802528462007,"score_gpt":0.22858604850121866,"score_spread":0.2184480232165986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6984940627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00065304694,0.0026913949,0.00026499844,0.0020315328,0.000952256,0.000023744442,0.008118064,0.00024917172,0.98501575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023203243,0.0014680874,0.0002044435,0.0002413691,0.00006308979,0.000012630275,0.0013760596,0.00014256213,0.99417144],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994679,0.000040579693,0.000027399861,0.0001603243,0.00020880539,0.000094881805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989447,0.00010724472,0.00006575587,0.000101412705,0.00042905044,0.00035183004],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003151111,0.0013316054,0.0006618507,0.0011692073,0.004728551,0.0055365143,0.0006607009,0.0018922213,0.81494856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011885574,0.0004999947,0.00043432837,0.0035088065,0.0007562343,0.0019870535,0.0016207225,0.0014855632,0.4461962],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043049055,0.000019353387,0.0005146986,0.00013850046,0.000005317854,0.00029256442,0.0002452998,0.000106999345,0.00020341578,0.010394244,0.92753315,0.06050345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055597443,0.0000035973205,0.0006860217,0.00005514755,0.0000020721995,0.000038755476,0.00018388005,0.000031030944,0.00005428832,0.00039320666,0.99854195,0.000004512279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17640786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5029738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18505144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054957396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072891843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35076213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987667048","doi":"","title":"Tort Vision for the New Millenium: Strengthening News Industry Standards as a Defense Tool in Lawsuits Over Newsgathering Techniques","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Journalism; Cynicism; News media; Sensationalism; Skepticism; Witness; Dozen; Government (linguistics); Politics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.02656282208526457,"score_gpt":0.37860359292139617,"score_spread":0.3520407708361316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987667048","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031266943,0.0041476013,0.03491708,0.68012977,0.0036828434,0.00022386956,0.00003077741,0.00051119516,0.24508992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6537786,0.0022276663,0.028482622,0.23036994,0.0020457427,0.0004983261,0.000050550057,0.00035923359,0.08218727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9650653,0.018116452,0.0010784407,0.0032238108,0.009731659,0.0027844044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93442136,0.03730406,0.005243383,0.00868348,0.008621232,0.0057264394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053755555,0.00056211115,0.00050077745,0.00305469,0.01784618,0.022826428,0.0034011914,0.016026199,0.0110311555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.100269444,0.00070812606,0.0007305347,0.0013914164,0.035703003,0.027998215,0.013130876,0.02439409,0.0021538413],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003935034,0.00013542797,0.0015872932,0.000074331,0.000011640994,0.00018984544,0.014265396,0.00013827601,0.0004805882,0.8499667,0.08083212,0.052279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011130166,0.0002619322,0.0029645364,0.00084753335,0.00003769891,0.00038809085,0.0189586,0.001579506,0.0014507746,0.31598592,0.6573209,0.00009311475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008336437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012645109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053755555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0090544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022098564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28428996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987668490","doi":"","title":"Toronto Judge Rules Drug Law Constitutional at Time of Project Claudia Pot Raids","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Legislation; Constitution; Constitutional law; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.016366570909449936,"score_gpt":0.28686749373574977,"score_spread":0.27050092282629984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987668490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052441742,0.0039742733,0.0024573682,0.42331967,0.007849058,0.0011408962,0.0028900746,0.00029528618,0.5056316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19219089,0.0011521709,0.0016614799,0.09628946,0.001166917,0.00021668254,0.00031202135,0.00014497436,0.7068655],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881093,0.0009962252,0.00031243335,0.0014337756,0.0047998913,0.0043484103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991039,0.0031355834,0.00029706716,0.0004074539,0.002704487,0.0024163777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077213026,0.0005955183,0.0006563731,0.0014115369,0.028433057,0.0108963745,0.0031415394,0.023703761,0.030574897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019270552,0.0012737808,0.000888253,0.0008662179,0.0071572536,0.0024273284,0.003160482,0.023561321,0.0023728418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099959056,0.00009923737,0.0044286484,0.00006797452,0.000047282294,0.0019157851,0.0033047926,0.00049779454,0.0009403687,0.2717008,0.70870787,0.008189532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008826142,0.00010985546,0.01232546,0.00015388396,0.00008370436,0.00033700047,0.00335124,0.0006919322,0.0028470857,0.014366158,0.96551025,0.00013524108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76270497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9322014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23729503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046422873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09877117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47738498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987815837","doi":"","title":"The Tobacco Damages and Health Care Costs Recovery Act: JTI-Macdonald Corp. v. British Columbia (Attorney General)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Health care; Public health; Health services; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.017267325668893517,"score_gpt":0.2933006148335574,"score_spread":0.2760332891646639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987815837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072777875,0.008471442,0.0013219327,0.18135387,0.0017455403,0.00049110886,0.008937674,0.0003562736,0.7245443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36312902,0.003366047,0.0015690093,0.09859561,0.00044879768,0.00022374655,0.0023810167,0.000089854686,0.5301969],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99670947,0.0002494611,0.00011119647,0.00017698316,0.0019371244,0.0008157367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978769,0.00041262087,0.00015703056,0.000105386025,0.0010664023,0.00038160157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014318464,0.0005113144,0.00038134333,0.0013596702,0.007917468,0.0048907753,0.0015481095,0.009005088,0.009200647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007851059,0.0006620816,0.00048587803,0.0016488261,0.0016948397,0.00089871103,0.0013566104,0.005933068,0.0018333528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011169333,0.000095444746,0.00998177,0.00009880778,0.00004237157,0.0006302148,0.0019079668,0.00045999564,0.0010626805,0.08510148,0.87374806,0.026759459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015895885,0.000100178775,0.1146904,0.0004248589,0.00024382699,0.00042121852,0.0021204753,0.0014897037,0.0022791715,0.015238678,0.8626552,0.00017725803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9244711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9741528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07552892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023517998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05704736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17063582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989218424","doi":"","title":"Appeals for Cuyahoga County and Eighth Appellate District","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Tribunal; Duty; Certification; State (computer science); Civility; General partnership","score_opus":0.01848183159256727,"score_gpt":0.29088567262962706,"score_spread":0.2724038410370598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989218424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04692615,0.003526056,0.00069961976,0.062343575,0.012750754,0.001553539,0.0056181243,0.0008447411,0.86573756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035808776,0.0005319625,0.00042487937,0.006267602,0.0010094519,0.00028472405,0.0009460105,0.00008851003,0.9546382],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988519,0.00008425786,0.000041565887,0.00020588296,0.00042041094,0.00039595834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795556,0.00023779967,0.00004041251,0.00009712938,0.0009323437,0.0007366926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010373519,0.0006493596,0.0005864302,0.0010091801,0.00854265,0.0027129527,0.001162623,0.0045350743,0.21447228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033503056,0.0006238507,0.00047105155,0.00036676083,0.00066951284,0.00084304425,0.0020168235,0.0041688983,0.031345032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013930071,0.00024239809,0.0031606278,0.000059679536,0.000011932015,0.001498977,0.00027426129,0.00007722899,0.0011190687,0.0051335893,0.9640351,0.024247818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009185224,0.00010863396,0.03968906,0.00013556433,0.00001981693,0.00031040842,0.0020034327,0.0006744461,0.0003423876,0.0010878642,0.9554933,0.00004332219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07664943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2607404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21447228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028079732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066009285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71748126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989932932","doi":"","title":"Coasting North: The Problem with the Jones Act for the Offshore Wind Industry and a Remedy from Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Offshore wind power; License; Turbine; Wind power; Submarine pipeline","score_opus":0.018490849914238258,"score_gpt":0.2540137610808956,"score_spread":0.2355229111666573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989932932","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06159904,0.0056986557,0.00408786,0.34618,0.0021958682,0.00022568388,0.00029658712,0.00012156505,0.57959485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5465148,0.00556292,0.0039728163,0.18084642,0.0005630808,0.00014479079,0.00019107554,0.000115996896,0.2620881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882025,0.000729559,0.00040129936,0.0012516334,0.006129852,0.0032850702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923645,0.0028155197,0.00034869966,0.00035530815,0.0031024741,0.0010133634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004539923,0.0004420952,0.00041374777,0.0011859337,0.029434502,0.010381473,0.0028964393,0.013320328,0.00494623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015439563,0.0006336729,0.0007197418,0.0018947248,0.011535232,0.0030340452,0.0035395543,0.014493095,0.00067643984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019786281,0.000020317679,0.002197692,0.000047499234,0.000011785578,0.00085277425,0.004915594,0.000509037,0.00033552016,0.8624905,0.11624858,0.012350987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056947763,0.00003710896,0.0064317477,0.0004265396,0.00006237357,0.00055526936,0.016278453,0.0021430193,0.0010017714,0.044972397,0.92783695,0.00019736227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9741819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9854022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06860486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06860486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22632533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49776542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990101384","doi":"","title":"Court Review: Journal of the American Judges Association, Vol. 58, No. 2","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Independence (probability theory); Judicial review; Judicial opinion; Supreme court; Publishing","score_opus":0.007592523473474518,"score_gpt":0.23228970374568148,"score_spread":0.22469718027220695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990101384","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015311772,0.15082762,0.001180233,0.29372114,0.14737047,0.00037176482,0.001538388,0.00047776083,0.40298143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015151045,0.062689945,0.0011190953,0.05346026,0.037406106,0.000387684,0.0008856836,0.00036953785,0.8285305],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99372053,0.00093171414,0.0005364463,0.0005824791,0.0036827,0.00054614554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793361,0.0025480106,0.000581733,0.00093340623,0.01516212,0.0014385609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063045523,0.0006107932,0.0012568005,0.0027535027,0.005478708,0.009943791,0.0015099066,0.006266151,0.108217284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027924368,0.00095527124,0.00082445896,0.0027404258,0.0022714832,0.0028491656,0.0020891777,0.007466055,0.07499721],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005974498,0.0000071978693,0.00016246512,0.00008144203,0.0000042089355,0.000023844517,0.00003126922,0.000018070177,0.000056670462,0.0022347553,0.9811437,0.016230384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029526716,0.000003600194,0.00044299115,0.0002136465,0.0000029565404,0.000015781761,0.00003638329,0.000017708277,0.000011807849,0.0004498754,0.99879754,0.000004667367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036254436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09285652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.108217284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066352957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015265091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36202288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991126884","doi":"","title":"Following Unprecedented Winter Storm in Texas and Protection Granted under the CCAA in Canada, Just Energy Receives Chapter 15 Bankruptcy Protection in U.S.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Storm; Energy (signal processing); Falling (accident)","score_opus":0.027086463160216446,"score_gpt":0.25951441044350626,"score_spread":0.2324279472832898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991126884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017387914,0.0011618753,0.00048735662,0.028142635,0.0012927577,0.00021628125,0.008267864,0.00048250976,0.9425608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029106084,0.0005098078,0.00033267224,0.008236379,0.00017243509,0.000110514324,0.0014128259,0.00009871094,0.9600206],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988279,0.00005621675,0.000023703204,0.00010855012,0.0003856603,0.0005980234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998478,0.00024148755,0.00006997613,0.00009623976,0.00084065547,0.0002736016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009491343,0.0004538666,0.00031189658,0.0008381867,0.008969464,0.005757246,0.0013548912,0.0060165,0.06315972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027669852,0.000366725,0.00038540777,0.0008513843,0.0012114259,0.0009353047,0.0019421985,0.004320147,0.014989938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037926584,0.00005132377,0.0029710578,0.000053627402,0.0000059846375,0.00039799936,0.0007266129,0.00014850785,0.00045133076,0.052086256,0.92888397,0.014185423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001685723,0.000020158808,0.012606768,0.00008607602,0.0000071555887,0.000072422954,0.0010942963,0.00023791453,0.00048081196,0.0016720727,0.983685,0.000020419126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6211751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8699309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3788249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011235828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027173573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7621117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991452684","doi":"","title":"Guenther v. Ryerson Appellant's Reply Brief Dckt. 46258","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Work (physics); Period (music); Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.013858319489062758,"score_gpt":0.2653042816211919,"score_spread":0.25144596213212916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991452684","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005263347,0.0068517677,0.0006089446,0.6647092,0.008519238,0.00018192572,0.0021134699,0.0002182696,0.31153378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023514148,0.0016757121,0.00033126597,0.7317731,0.00233853,0.00020559553,0.00029746105,0.0000645237,0.2397997],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99533075,0.0007119843,0.00029686643,0.0007747581,0.0014153308,0.0014703224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994915,0.0029885585,0.00017049197,0.000227598,0.0012757677,0.00042259792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003650419,0.0009263191,0.0008798724,0.0015734312,0.01046007,0.005230975,0.0028690188,0.052351043,0.032232393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013767354,0.0011317742,0.0012888231,0.0015392466,0.0022205315,0.0024271253,0.0020516093,0.021790938,0.012671641],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054696236,0.000027830562,0.0005198558,0.00005782189,0.000011733793,0.00041921984,0.00048205798,0.00006901498,0.0003770646,0.037910733,0.95668083,0.003389131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007933575,0.00004631445,0.0052752793,0.000338077,0.000059374976,0.0002586647,0.0012139636,0.000282209,0.0007673573,0.0107629355,0.9808157,0.00010075626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16348334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33589575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16348334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007455194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011881044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32506347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997026219","doi":"","title":"Troy Davis Faced Long Odds of Winning Reprieve","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Odds; Work (physics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Year-ending","score_opus":0.09231987947661377,"score_gpt":0.3163945917422137,"score_spread":0.2240747122655999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6997026219","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21873108,0.002262364,0.0007419272,0.60162836,0.0038904247,0.00007693599,0.000319606,0.0001619879,0.17218725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7199814,0.0016929674,0.0006619947,0.1379201,0.0014231118,0.00007163813,0.00011795901,0.00009984726,0.1380311],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944239,0.0012651833,0.00020514372,0.00057598134,0.0013442445,0.0021854679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898387,0.0040808637,0.00085107185,0.00025531935,0.0015673415,0.0034066257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040804297,0.0003372446,0.00051873986,0.00065716245,0.0213205,0.0085823,0.00083425915,0.009721858,0.024164721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025506042,0.00053860183,0.0004731739,0.0003629461,0.002983124,0.0018552912,0.0025695476,0.015379944,0.00331562],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037169622,0.00023866793,0.035893194,0.00010998012,0.00014147905,0.0071662483,0.014497399,0.0002794905,0.0010544073,0.051412176,0.8466378,0.04219748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008908172,0.00064798014,0.050662752,0.0005241328,0.00015653693,0.0037336221,0.092239894,0.0011963249,0.0033929218,0.015687147,0.8313148,0.0003547585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0449307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13822407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0449307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003910575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058831684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08933836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997094726","doi":"","title":"Transmission and Transport of Energy in the Western U.S. and Canada: A Law and Policy Road Map","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Renewable energy; Plan (archaeology); Energy policy; Road map; Architecture; Wind power; Energy law; Energy (signal processing); Power (physics); Transmission (telecommunications)","score_opus":0.01580401760100098,"score_gpt":0.2600426619460496,"score_spread":0.2442386443450486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6997094726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024298145,0.03869207,0.0020097073,0.3793967,0.0011094278,0.00018832572,0.0020819155,0.00013927754,0.5520844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5689983,0.109585166,0.0062558707,0.07070896,0.00091074,0.00036283716,0.0015380814,0.00016649565,0.24147356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620616,0.0003504442,0.00012053013,0.00023383675,0.0016491405,0.0014398127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99628013,0.0006009185,0.00016985381,0.00007289628,0.0022908014,0.0005855172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020365869,0.0005977739,0.00055372546,0.005287051,0.028283432,0.021664245,0.00254792,0.0050862464,0.009751932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048629665,0.0006546224,0.00052024546,0.010868268,0.016757425,0.0039806115,0.0029026056,0.005760839,0.000705384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008547412,0.000022395085,0.001728996,0.00011785089,0.000010992461,0.00021475827,0.004552557,0.0013407924,0.00014345058,0.790317,0.18469127,0.016851373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014606559,0.000008756113,0.009408705,0.0012050511,0.000025608972,0.0000546133,0.02815209,0.0015126573,0.00018983886,0.06892913,0.8903971,0.00010199595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99686855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99693847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20475788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20475788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.39367685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9223681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998503145","doi":"","title":"An act relating to the payment for funeral services performed by a transferring funeral home under a purchase agreement for funeral services or merchandise.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Portal to Texas History (University of North Texas)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Agreement; Funeral Rites; Service (business); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.025835061350692176,"score_gpt":0.24933339852712466,"score_spread":0.22349833717643247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998503145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020077876,0.00038408977,0.00032955172,0.004778636,0.00090115657,0.00014325515,0.0017166527,0.00017512978,0.98956376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0055510737,0.00016162789,0.00018291816,0.0031762577,0.00011336632,0.00008425352,0.00051161007,0.000053826738,0.9901652],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983051,0.00029785436,0.00008016863,0.00014566923,0.00075396977,0.00041722498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998109,0.0004326003,0.00010565087,0.00013430868,0.00096665364,0.0002518014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001585045,0.0006996575,0.0003080745,0.0011380223,0.0068861023,0.0037276715,0.0011816521,0.006593909,0.13806795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054307743,0.00056680385,0.00040837564,0.0010205407,0.0017152939,0.0019739245,0.0024972328,0.006040521,0.090553835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024947592,0.000051666397,0.00034073682,0.00003554632,0.0000020191071,0.00014879076,0.0005402955,0.000045806115,0.00021894366,0.062338453,0.9273136,0.00893911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013023536,0.000011839059,0.0025526695,0.000082151295,0.000002821667,0.000054616223,0.00046834457,0.000085574764,0.00020473693,0.0022352273,0.9942737,0.000015254398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.116070405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21082313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13806795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004990529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010872134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4618833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000871551","doi":"","title":"Housing Authority of the County of Salt Lake v. John Thomas Snyder : Amicus Brief","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Salt lake; Appeal; George (robot); Salt water; Nova scotia","score_opus":0.01749259706006662,"score_gpt":0.27898481259905156,"score_spread":0.26149221553898494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000871551","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0444982,0.009963724,0.00032639154,0.44854274,0.0033182723,0.00035941988,0.0015663157,0.00018222914,0.4912426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14127043,0.0054809465,0.00042382823,0.2957713,0.0022625579,0.0005253623,0.0005985598,0.00007005372,0.553597],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973646,0.00027230164,0.000108026485,0.00026025012,0.001097365,0.00089744653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971179,0.001126606,0.00012272876,0.000073601484,0.00093754235,0.0006217371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024959762,0.0003839446,0.00039533974,0.0010704512,0.016524758,0.005002322,0.0018512241,0.014261991,0.022441106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059933094,0.0009056338,0.00039574417,0.0012598267,0.0021150925,0.001789212,0.002300895,0.006517116,0.003275684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005718411,0.000052801795,0.0021692724,0.00009111689,0.000015495196,0.0005645716,0.0014129463,0.00010502643,0.00054070813,0.05224814,0.9339901,0.008752717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007029019,0.00006021523,0.02060696,0.00027221008,0.000058399564,0.0001599978,0.0023398434,0.00037570254,0.00061014073,0.006716559,0.96864307,0.000086685446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5022782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7752149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5022782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013811846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040211912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99870926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010184151","doi":"","title":"Guenther v. Ryerson Appellant's Brief Dckt. 46258","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.013729893608641715,"score_gpt":0.26541531733287893,"score_spread":0.2516854237242372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010184151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013836211,0.0061667543,0.00082498963,0.074165985,0.0017326309,0.0002597582,0.0024965343,0.00023597384,0.90028113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07511028,0.0022323267,0.0005423237,0.13016273,0.00063967356,0.0002722094,0.0006491926,0.00006677417,0.79032445],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975715,0.0002797979,0.00010077761,0.0003266733,0.0009077886,0.00081343146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846977,0.00077349215,0.000066339846,0.00008933458,0.00041362486,0.00018750501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018118256,0.00059408345,0.00048499028,0.001339524,0.008176205,0.0035090165,0.0014541266,0.015655681,0.029874107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004969688,0.0008504158,0.00069462415,0.0008713673,0.0013102089,0.0013433319,0.0015093776,0.008289556,0.011641027],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111404006,0.000080068465,0.0017117464,0.00010396748,0.000021178268,0.000916693,0.0009634495,0.0001559603,0.0014743826,0.116005406,0.8650435,0.01341227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064256914,0.000076787604,0.010592589,0.00028672384,0.00006852244,0.00034658037,0.0007114037,0.00037792657,0.0012265947,0.0070264377,0.97914916,0.000073012954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18874384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4013013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18874384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049966793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00859791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37529045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7012996211","doi":"","title":"Richwood, Ohio","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Agency (philosophy); Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.008959358244449368,"score_gpt":0.2235847370523514,"score_spread":0.21462537880790203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7012996211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045699338,0.0018386368,0.00048020118,0.0015671104,0.00081553345,0.000047878017,0.003907154,0.0005085332,0.9903779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015025843,0.0010310657,0.00024884313,0.00037773943,0.00007704744,0.00003829513,0.0008294131,0.00019709158,0.995698],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920636,0.00006294982,0.000033248587,0.00030375834,0.0002935721,0.00010006308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992416,0.000121630335,0.000052849104,0.000112376234,0.00028107365,0.00019044294],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065260223,0.0018671829,0.000632904,0.0017151991,0.004336255,0.0058110883,0.001174815,0.0026067076,0.8454563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017714562,0.000964714,0.00056611764,0.002742749,0.0007922782,0.0044518695,0.0025397989,0.003765539,0.5981406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042309464,0.00006748646,0.00037091525,0.00008376236,0.000004814177,0.00015448451,0.00015778089,0.000056088207,0.00026537548,0.00996473,0.8865567,0.10227557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008462887,0.000006889214,0.0005386145,0.000073652285,0.0000021072944,0.00004877808,0.00010352953,0.00002930169,0.00006308188,0.0005759605,0.9985447,0.0000049014006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01865844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054722894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8454563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001602214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025673355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22043782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7013055011","doi":"","title":"Toronto, Ohio","year":2009,"lang":"mk","type":"other","venue":"OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Government (linguistics); Geologist","score_opus":0.008719135659210588,"score_gpt":0.22145720696668203,"score_spread":0.21273807130747144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7013055011","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008911819,0.00312368,0.00035709457,0.0026101067,0.0012628441,0.00003086711,0.008627649,0.0002950574,0.9828015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004207425,0.002522768,0.00041328828,0.0003418434,0.00011800594,0.000022696737,0.0018385603,0.00020572144,0.9903296],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944156,0.000043694392,0.000031683387,0.00017174901,0.00021545892,0.00009587091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987459,0.00014889188,0.00007225474,0.00011441877,0.00050786074,0.00041060412],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030323723,0.0012838378,0.00065191375,0.0011736584,0.004687474,0.0051480224,0.0006743721,0.0015837385,0.77088517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013509394,0.0005162007,0.00043376564,0.0034307367,0.0007916156,0.0017911514,0.0013388755,0.0014344109,0.37791875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056876277,0.000025940439,0.0008431766,0.00016351283,0.0000071962595,0.0003392321,0.00031481934,0.000121694255,0.00032706198,0.011514191,0.91283554,0.0734509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008747391,0.0000054488414,0.0010592255,0.00006904756,0.0000034800955,0.000046844478,0.00026355364,0.00004435281,0.00008685971,0.00055492483,0.997851,0.0000064127285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16803907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5189298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77088517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004671497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006833019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.334122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014701246","doi":"","title":"Recent Developments: Pridgeon v. Bd. of License Comm'rs for Prince George's County: Board of License Commissioners Was Statutorily Required to Hold a Hearing on Whether a Liquor License Should Be Renewed, Even Though the Protest Was Withdrawn Prior to the Hearing","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Baltimore Law Forum","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"License; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.049207764494861035,"score_gpt":0.3019725169418427,"score_spread":0.25276475244698166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014701246","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088520855,0.015592555,0.0016903942,0.6283567,0.008229,0.000107422726,0.0011605102,0.00016057144,0.25618196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5198161,0.013012297,0.0021149714,0.25585482,0.00826372,0.00011989891,0.0010867097,0.00010235848,0.19962904],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962076,0.00046441655,0.00020699063,0.0007208235,0.0014100191,0.0009901592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889654,0.0047472343,0.0010007564,0.00033071655,0.0030548514,0.0019010237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056336727,0.000379541,0.0002882473,0.0016824027,0.008501104,0.009682284,0.0030767224,0.014059369,0.013771564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015887653,0.00072448363,0.0006532556,0.0016715474,0.0051157502,0.0038461268,0.0029223203,0.014572887,0.0017334017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093888404,0.0002468356,0.009342084,0.0005996661,0.00006700463,0.0023812454,0.007354024,0.0005212469,0.0014092055,0.2739493,0.65991,0.044125512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039386643,0.00007002323,0.02041406,0.00022429241,0.000059107017,0.00043947797,0.0039260415,0.00025606935,0.00087687996,0.0067651947,0.9668582,0.00007134115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19651893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36737758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19651893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010274617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015802046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3907501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014955031","doi":"","title":"Searches and Seizures: The-Times-They-Are-A-Changin' or Technology Issue Avoidance, City of Ontario, Cal. v. Quon, 130 S. Ct. 2619 (2010)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UF Law Scholarship Repository (University of Florida)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Population; Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.027488240345517383,"score_gpt":0.24192800327988936,"score_spread":0.21443976293437197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014955031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07899515,0.009666193,0.0007371374,0.15377887,0.00031780926,0.000096192285,0.0019922496,0.00006945883,0.75434697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6991982,0.0069011436,0.0004812037,0.038231492,0.00018384717,0.00007288984,0.00052827306,0.000047950296,0.25435498],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988913,0.00012383242,0.000042980086,0.00007894076,0.00035732798,0.00050565705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989241,0.000365714,0.00012478918,0.00003671427,0.0003312649,0.00021740365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008147396,0.0003075228,0.00019018106,0.00065940566,0.015784517,0.005432258,0.000958568,0.0069488934,0.010840434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037044042,0.0003895149,0.00026698064,0.0011277035,0.0038384374,0.002162287,0.0013072373,0.0027519215,0.0009447712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006874117,0.00005011936,0.018078895,0.000121337966,0.000024894882,0.0014554246,0.026021924,0.00029715121,0.000519364,0.30087352,0.6338788,0.018609824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005861439,0.00004101039,0.07551592,0.00026039453,0.00008852324,0.00039324848,0.052654345,0.0007614304,0.0008871834,0.02584414,0.8434037,0.0000915189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9433493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9911842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9433493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032083243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03824898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23278129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015726380","doi":"","title":"\"There's No Place Like Home\" DOMA Deportation: The Forced Expatriation of Bi-national Same-Sex Couples from the United States to Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital USD (University of San Diego)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; Hyporeflexia; TSG101; Diafiltration; Pretext; Articular cartilage damage; Proteogenomics","score_opus":0.01590776529561467,"score_gpt":0.22093716047150494,"score_spread":0.20502939517589028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015726380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41370293,0.005153951,0.001687404,0.28946036,0.005084565,0.00016948977,0.00049778534,0.00009739237,0.2841462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7879916,0.002950789,0.0005092718,0.08082625,0.00028834032,0.000056761168,0.00013402216,0.000057147838,0.12718575],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975573,0.000179153,0.000063041145,0.00018619178,0.0006437461,0.0013706336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791116,0.0004253875,0.00011832677,0.00009534018,0.0008840533,0.0005656684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016634491,0.00028215616,0.00032004036,0.0004573887,0.046105362,0.0047968035,0.002081641,0.0058618276,0.0048408224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004685819,0.00022154077,0.0005375358,0.0007341316,0.0077205165,0.0011429491,0.0031880795,0.006637675,0.00044236667],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013148334,0.00009043847,0.041722823,0.00017856469,0.000039994775,0.008251263,0.2473519,0.0007702501,0.0018616761,0.22546339,0.43236223,0.041775916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036292782,0.000049688355,0.035935447,0.000504635,0.000071494826,0.0016898634,0.32956514,0.00077746355,0.0015830153,0.004574441,0.6250198,0.00019277462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9866057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046105362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03368469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0968824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24440062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7016102733","doi":"","title":"Yes, Curbing U.S. Fossil Fuel Extraction Does Reduce Climate Pollution","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Fossil fuel; Government (linguistics); Renewable energy; Climate change; Energy policy; Energy source; Nothing; Climate policy","score_opus":0.02042270204422874,"score_gpt":0.30457160513571313,"score_spread":0.2841489030914844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7016102733","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062162835,0.031224044,0.0046644853,0.5751303,0.011802938,0.00003880289,0.0030427505,0.0007695516,0.31116426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60374844,0.03773592,0.006820779,0.23761366,0.003312808,0.00009535542,0.002569356,0.0004895987,0.10761404],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941885,0.000106149404,0.000022420249,0.000104798324,0.00024669297,0.00010105883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826944,0.00035380648,0.00025043025,0.00020954225,0.0006901498,0.00022665305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011984366,0.00041884402,0.00030218327,0.0005060778,0.001650479,0.002653509,0.00045860634,0.002090757,0.025238425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044041756,0.00014927838,0.00057936454,0.0007951626,0.0017689385,0.0026245909,0.0013729511,0.0023966213,0.0050160615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035568848,0.0004279305,0.013992943,0.00081277866,0.0002536784,0.00012800474,0.00074197835,0.0010172375,0.0048779533,0.1456886,0.63276917,0.19893408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000617651,0.00020819737,0.018033296,0.000641068,0.00017766724,0.000072832474,0.0011294353,0.0004054956,0.0044379975,0.04722432,0.92756677,0.00004115746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009871844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02046053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025238425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011607513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025127467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08443093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019129083","doi":"","title":"FRIENDS OF THE EEL RIVER AND CALIFORNIANS FOR ALTERNATIVES TO TOXICS v. NORTH COAST RAILROAD AUTHORITY AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF NORTH COAST RAILROAD AUTHORITY, et al., PLAINTIFFS’ CONSOLIDATED RESPONSE TO BRIEFS OF AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS AND REAL PARTY IN INTEREST","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Plaintiff; Supreme court; State (computer science); Nova scotia; Damages","score_opus":0.05139422025202575,"score_gpt":0.34990099180598105,"score_spread":0.29850677155395533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019129083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06233238,0.0061729713,0.0012240565,0.2765605,0.0038232221,0.0007595144,0.0029642954,0.00030169505,0.6458614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31868002,0.003708475,0.0017481258,0.25752088,0.0016213584,0.00096375955,0.0017573767,0.00010020735,0.41389978],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99104184,0.0012865058,0.00059588015,0.00093690585,0.0037024755,0.0024364202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878626,0.006615073,0.0006198631,0.00043699282,0.003372772,0.0010927697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064423704,0.0007433227,0.00059898524,0.0013686944,0.0142997615,0.004442148,0.0026499121,0.015154658,0.018870184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02254388,0.0009637089,0.0007576899,0.0010700724,0.0022048382,0.0024194529,0.0026633055,0.01199646,0.0035285584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014661359,0.00012839164,0.005254287,0.00014506893,0.00003369515,0.0015732906,0.0027930283,0.00017723234,0.0011885677,0.04112893,0.9388517,0.008579159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025073424,0.00023123538,0.051141668,0.00042487402,0.00018068151,0.0004133014,0.009485077,0.0008054246,0.0022454197,0.007067599,0.9275569,0.00019707535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25274345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25274345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009871808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017384581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50254464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030076165","doi":"","title":"Lynn and Eileen Harding v. Pecan Ridge Partners, Atlas Title Insurance Agency, Scott Wilson, Jeremy Larkin, Scott Nielson, Randy Kidman, Dave White, and Roger Cater: Brief of Appellees","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ridge; Appeal; Atlas (anatomy); Nova scotia","score_opus":0.014616687968409365,"score_gpt":0.28349687182476796,"score_spread":0.2688801838563586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7030076165","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021703657,0.017559277,0.0012118488,0.33507475,0.003823466,0.00022422466,0.0028691601,0.00013926112,0.6173944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15423584,0.0066105276,0.00088085205,0.21659662,0.0010762125,0.00030634785,0.0010094565,0.00010175416,0.6191824],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756527,0.00029365177,0.000114388415,0.0002831127,0.0010513467,0.0006921926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966717,0.0015483791,0.00016610375,0.000106172454,0.0008768054,0.00063082593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028756643,0.00041794937,0.00042770506,0.00089303876,0.014588445,0.005727851,0.0018426338,0.011119774,0.025463846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012461072,0.00079628214,0.0005479491,0.0010563779,0.0015304602,0.0028084458,0.0017744834,0.0084512355,0.0041601057],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000602469,0.000051059294,0.0029387248,0.00007254871,0.00001104734,0.00045096406,0.0012083781,0.00007865864,0.00035116778,0.04854626,0.9359628,0.010268202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006525527,0.000054820528,0.017579148,0.0004086724,0.000049860806,0.00019096656,0.004292947,0.00041044998,0.0009964536,0.012696239,0.9631844,0.00007082771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27039254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6414665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27039254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066147726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019039158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53763735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W70356315","doi":"","title":"Crossing the Floor, Conflict of Interest and the Parliament of Canada Act","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Conflict of interest; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.043856197623508175,"score_gpt":0.2820548642309233,"score_spread":0.23819866660741512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W70356315","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042001247,0.06362508,0.0015726478,0.53431314,0.004318334,0.00024842392,0.0014506712,0.00008041822,0.35239005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.689663,0.022415932,0.0034739182,0.1524381,0.0015490616,0.0002803409,0.00050927023,0.00013407692,0.1295363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95460093,0.006704712,0.0018940802,0.002042967,0.023386188,0.011371284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9410132,0.021218155,0.002879427,0.0010514577,0.025942849,0.007894936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020059066,0.0007059998,0.0012560388,0.0065452033,0.03497382,0.02461374,0.0052644815,0.018922178,0.008205532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.092294544,0.0011446767,0.0008620966,0.009647291,0.014762164,0.004384801,0.003982531,0.015188991,0.0006629501],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005697841,0.000039456616,0.0032982237,0.0002352804,0.000062134204,0.00030194948,0.005851295,0.00086389895,0.00013512596,0.67494184,0.2960487,0.018165119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010234618,0.0000347761,0.033300165,0.0013306547,0.0002031745,0.00013740476,0.0090671135,0.0014278428,0.0004394644,0.0855123,0.86806846,0.0003764305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99443394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22247678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22247678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.514694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9018167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7039325051","doi":"","title":"&lt;i&gt;United States v. Osage Wind, LLC&lt;/i&gt;: Wind Energy Being Blown Away by New Rules?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Oklahoma College of Law - Digital Commons (University of Oklahoma)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lease; Wind power; Honor; Nautical mile; Surprise; State (computer science); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.01080830846888219,"score_gpt":0.2020041316549408,"score_spread":0.1911958231860586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7039325051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009778269,0.0076104403,0.000519605,0.2662076,0.005744344,0.00008641883,0.0013644189,0.00016864552,0.7085203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14126775,0.004412257,0.00052056985,0.16820477,0.0013150518,0.00013636978,0.00040478894,0.00013885365,0.6835996],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998889,0.00016332815,0.00006157791,0.00018170458,0.00029365977,0.00041074012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989543,0.00036540674,0.00011579211,0.000061494145,0.00032149386,0.00018151225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011443278,0.00041997727,0.00017934934,0.00046252972,0.011480539,0.005758769,0.0010303741,0.012263788,0.03675184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003263318,0.00043754204,0.00024354449,0.0007696273,0.0022605397,0.003921177,0.0011832207,0.008041064,0.006328397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001998967,0.000015033478,0.0010629705,0.000043453423,0.0000029521113,0.00041275827,0.0011006262,0.00004283849,0.00019974301,0.03989138,0.9511317,0.0060765836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000126679815,0.000011637472,0.0058083353,0.00030059466,0.00001646657,0.0000987174,0.0042149425,0.00015336892,0.0005959178,0.004726151,0.98402447,0.000036657555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34339318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57251227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34339318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009747738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009697718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68278885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043990833","doi":"","title":"UND Law Expert Participates in Task Force to Examine Impact of Violence on Native","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UND Scholarly Commons (University of North Dakota)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Tribe; Expert witness; Task force; Economic Justice; State (computer science); White (mutation); Witness; Indian country; State supreme court","score_opus":0.03391095217412572,"score_gpt":0.3063078121600432,"score_spread":0.2723968599859175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043990833","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016107595,0.005006371,0.0039881794,0.13086578,0.013723017,0.004059177,0.016543161,0.0013250738,0.8083817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031286918,0.0045215744,0.0049497415,0.048682544,0.0015331676,0.0018760547,0.008967654,0.0003827009,0.89779973],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99411374,0.0008096061,0.0006949827,0.0007047573,0.0024525656,0.0012244965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9822404,0.0028872136,0.00081770995,0.001091861,0.009816709,0.0031462258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009191978,0.0007588287,0.0006168861,0.0040442073,0.005556724,0.0038558473,0.0018011273,0.005850662,0.11175639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015176209,0.0006971017,0.0006388963,0.001921741,0.0010920864,0.0024013023,0.0030945411,0.0034582696,0.041379668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025526793,0.00012725052,0.0054050945,0.00012724627,0.00000816642,0.0005924523,0.00045909313,0.000059234408,0.00042831013,0.002222827,0.9295326,0.061012235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013698886,0.000030127736,0.009343255,0.0002832579,0.000009411488,0.0001923812,0.0012550944,0.000077268276,0.00026209763,0.0007184438,0.98779976,0.000015137883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036469184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11286084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11175639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038172198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01650583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37386233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7066250321","doi":"","title":"H06-1637. Dethmers, John R. ( -2006). Papers, 1860-1944. 0.50 linear ft.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hope College Digital Commons (Hope College)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; George (robot); Square (algebra); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.021721234685970574,"score_gpt":0.2754955373950459,"score_spread":0.2537743027090753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7066250321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037347508,0.0075879833,0.00013344854,0.0060498808,0.0057531367,0.000091810616,0.0062763374,0.00027886874,0.9734551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010368138,0.0013381466,0.00005286225,0.0012884347,0.00035357088,0.000035287238,0.0005776239,0.00004928695,0.9952679],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967444,0.000030619172,0.000023951807,0.00007831626,0.000118463635,0.000074231546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937445,0.000076704375,0.000044552384,0.000035474353,0.00032676067,0.00014204107],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052492274,0.000971559,0.00045858053,0.001349539,0.002357438,0.0036198224,0.0008092869,0.0034727065,0.6855025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013230061,0.00042717348,0.00033526894,0.0018636581,0.00043562165,0.0021452764,0.0012542211,0.0021559761,0.60093516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026539485,0.000026883967,0.00017584683,0.000055633147,0.0000014329852,0.00002901261,0.000037977028,0.000009069268,0.00008028068,0.0027758076,0.9622803,0.034501195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000478448,0.00001006335,0.0007331252,0.00008779649,7.2741705e-7,0.000015479969,0.0000361875,0.0000067826754,0.000029042334,0.0002397778,0.99883384,0.0000023944165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017011523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04425809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6855025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017845732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016726938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44859242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071058531","doi":"","title":"Reasserting Tribal Forest Management Under Good Neighbor Authority","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Stewardship (theology); Revenue; Woodland; State (computer science); Service (business); Resource (disambiguation); Federal law; State forest","score_opus":0.030301911089065436,"score_gpt":0.29080126848444293,"score_spread":0.2604993573953775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071058531","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07133393,0.0065025515,0.00466117,0.5028664,0.01211581,0.00006709083,0.00004001682,0.00017822208,0.40223485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7681272,0.0018440869,0.003361352,0.1270142,0.0019582505,0.000066511115,0.000033209904,0.0002588749,0.09733623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99076897,0.0036067301,0.00025667873,0.0009147637,0.001774148,0.002678807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903881,0.0013203089,0.00028538855,0.0015812037,0.0018886181,0.0045363246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009540713,0.00023293788,0.00034524084,0.0006437924,0.027414689,0.011414497,0.0023839273,0.004621509,0.014100489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015625795,0.00031559152,0.00042739997,0.0004992951,0.016842822,0.009546595,0.009157968,0.011492186,0.001962401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031722586,0.00017271937,0.006713517,0.00007939557,0.00003142314,0.0014048634,0.15972622,0.00021562687,0.00073252124,0.44206148,0.29324263,0.0955879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009305072,0.000039096543,0.001961841,0.00017182264,0.000010963344,0.00027897148,0.07574439,0.00018421191,0.00018863882,0.029687451,0.8916917,0.000031667143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05695711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19215256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05695711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006041285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012850602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11325121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7111823523","doi":"","title":"Cardozo Law News Briefs: October 24, 2025","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Voting; Law enforcement; Section (typography); Economic Justice; Enforcement; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.01788095228372889,"score_gpt":0.2880913055025515,"score_spread":0.27021035321882264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7111823523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003260285,0.006934253,0.0003950924,0.06727052,0.034255628,0.00063598336,0.008641339,0.0008480049,0.87775886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008707627,0.0017733589,0.00019393927,0.023317438,0.0038238454,0.00034272706,0.0022415156,0.00012710481,0.9594724],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770266,0.00012457624,0.00007752092,0.00016108452,0.0012609261,0.0006731946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978126,0.00030199246,0.00015067868,0.0001234418,0.0009786973,0.0006325016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00203981,0.0009521568,0.0005302234,0.0023593956,0.008491243,0.009689936,0.0016718252,0.009092337,0.19507644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070680706,0.0007815489,0.0005011248,0.0016761849,0.0011227059,0.0027684686,0.0021711043,0.0076179975,0.07834554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016252912,0.000022575352,0.0000718948,0.00001952713,5.390431e-7,0.000054930064,0.000030369707,0.000007102945,0.00004788573,0.002128335,0.99367106,0.003929578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013533682,0.000012682221,0.0012659788,0.00006144011,0.0000014877705,0.0000180738,0.00010778078,0.000022474618,0.00006847044,0.00023804726,0.9981822,0.00000777687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12099826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23587368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19507644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010073155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007370886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6525957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132996695","doi":"","title":"The Search for a Model System which Balances Freedom and Respect for End of Life Decisions and Strict Regulation to Protect the Vulnerable from Abuse","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Charter; Supreme court; State (computer science); Value (mathematics); Human rights","score_opus":0.038226712707314876,"score_gpt":0.360749716669592,"score_spread":0.3225230039622771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132996695","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054577984,0.0016540834,0.24280345,0.18912695,0.00075994316,0.00059943955,0.00023109287,0.00017638256,0.5100707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.813543,0.002289386,0.12720245,0.012823983,0.00060991687,0.0010237196,0.00020770483,0.00012552459,0.042174347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918138,0.0032046624,0.00027624966,0.0012472238,0.0026785824,0.00077956996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921502,0.0032331944,0.0009421102,0.0011019921,0.0018277473,0.00074460305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016382111,0.00042332246,0.00059882435,0.002290719,0.007626564,0.011754124,0.002652893,0.0051307464,0.0052779857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012572085,0.00046213088,0.0011776233,0.0011345298,0.029960407,0.012964467,0.0045926864,0.009263181,0.0011268889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014497136,0.000008674499,0.00010863531,0.000007221177,0.0000020483742,0.000008149102,0.00040227588,0.00053581106,0.00004535323,0.99726945,0.0006661189,0.00094466977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032084587,0.000025666319,0.00026619676,0.00009065399,0.000008891233,0.000033521388,0.0009643436,0.0029956375,0.00016718628,0.9605712,0.03482314,0.000021435975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037304226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057893686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037304226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021251924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05366334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15419424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W77181116","doi":"10.29173/alr194","title":"Recent Judicial Developments of Interest to Oil and Gas Lawyers","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Energy law; Tort; Law; Judicial review; Fossil fuel; Political science; Economics; Agreement; Law and economics; Environmental law; Business; Liability; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04709673265114857,"score_gpt":0.3299872905711445,"score_spread":0.28289055791999596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W77181116","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018672444,0.7154145,0.0011158321,0.119592555,0.0025113802,0.000050131606,0.0002064582,0.000053947955,0.14238268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22299916,0.6801555,0.0019075093,0.048403833,0.009161661,0.000034885048,0.00043959238,0.00004158325,0.036856335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914799,0.0014150288,0.00044477286,0.0008863553,0.004321778,0.0014522141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9705594,0.012356499,0.0031228897,0.0004771304,0.012259644,0.0012245049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009631532,0.00022390643,0.0004863196,0.0051772166,0.004265635,0.008058454,0.0019282876,0.0060646236,0.006557772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022260604,0.000618783,0.00043923248,0.008947226,0.005222521,0.0027550561,0.0011203528,0.0050764424,0.0008631747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082642524,0.00014399708,0.003921763,0.0019869646,0.00005618177,0.001892707,0.0041280612,0.0011785879,0.0009140211,0.36079723,0.29109743,0.3338004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025092002,0.00003574076,0.010233105,0.000896294,0.000036043723,0.00080627704,0.001589755,0.00024188493,0.0002945889,0.010774542,0.97501546,0.000051212974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34376213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5898349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65623784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026871214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028847825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68352246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W79238141","doi":"","title":"Council of Canadians and CUPW v. the Attorney General of Canada - In support of the Applicant: Affidavit of M. Sornarajah","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TDM","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.016147513900933937,"score_gpt":0.22709230520229426,"score_spread":0.21094479130136032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W79238141","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039492905,0.009240182,0.0010445344,0.43978342,0.0048779557,0.00032370884,0.004211074,0.00022884517,0.50079745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23541582,0.005335255,0.0016604045,0.1904228,0.00085310603,0.00016376402,0.0010615102,0.00015731633,0.56492996],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906605,0.00052565447,0.0002465103,0.0004754802,0.004108615,0.003983357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868363,0.0022250735,0.000277746,0.00023444364,0.008180624,0.0022458327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050665755,0.00066261564,0.0008064889,0.0021027445,0.02938366,0.006424157,0.003691227,0.015698588,0.01877524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02127334,0.0007625169,0.0009561659,0.0031728745,0.002558245,0.0016615544,0.0022170478,0.009771448,0.0018087323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009701112,0.000051537798,0.0056498945,0.00013022205,0.000037465412,0.0005743245,0.0026064487,0.00019916042,0.00037190327,0.11316964,0.8658527,0.011259607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000948427,0.000044035758,0.020547565,0.00038299893,0.00021580324,0.0001764938,0.006157661,0.0008869336,0.0011081522,0.007291078,0.9629237,0.00017075724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9877202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99645245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05407118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05407118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19760264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3923157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W80058807","doi":"","title":"Council of Canadians and CUPW v. the Attorney General of Canada - In Support of the Respondent: Affidavit of J. Crawford","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TDM","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Respondent; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.019843222348233863,"score_gpt":0.23986387751023402,"score_spread":0.22002065516200017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W80058807","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042155657,0.009542569,0.00077636784,0.53574854,0.0046949857,0.00031110484,0.0051466464,0.00016943054,0.40145472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22396374,0.0052678003,0.0012017699,0.3064305,0.00079912454,0.00021529538,0.001197932,0.00014687794,0.46077693],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99151635,0.0005872371,0.00026257845,0.0004882844,0.0035550387,0.0035904755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98666096,0.003265817,0.00031776863,0.00027179698,0.007752237,0.00173133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005110043,0.00062071835,0.00078216364,0.00237653,0.029297391,0.0063589113,0.0038692476,0.01952587,0.01791123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022916486,0.0007640488,0.0009028823,0.004437347,0.003020079,0.0019835653,0.002045212,0.010317951,0.0016472756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000709096,0.00003072124,0.0042861137,0.00011068789,0.000026185036,0.00046537392,0.0031642877,0.000100082136,0.0002163845,0.078644745,0.9062691,0.0066154483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006594432,0.000024034482,0.017354194,0.0003958837,0.00014676881,0.00015811739,0.011003705,0.00049886364,0.000833567,0.0060916473,0.9632581,0.00016921412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9883571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99599373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05262094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05262094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14955547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38179344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W82309015","doi":"10.1017/s0098858800011163","title":"Rights Discourse and Assisted Suicide","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Law & Medicine","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Assisted suicide; Constitutionality; Political science; Legislation; Law; Constitutional right; Criminology; Supreme court; Psychology","score_opus":0.03345275892712883,"score_gpt":0.37419583861469624,"score_spread":0.3407430796875674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W82309015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040188525,0.023293896,0.0035024737,0.36899692,0.0020239265,0.000044636436,0.00006758,0.0000355683,0.56184655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91130567,0.0075437683,0.00084594864,0.045071807,0.0024719143,0.00009380016,0.000051266557,0.000046441484,0.03256927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98819375,0.0074617025,0.00045020363,0.001032783,0.001420869,0.0014406028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98826236,0.00853714,0.0010518094,0.00073651754,0.0007503278,0.00066190783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010811159,0.0005873176,0.0005435212,0.002247859,0.014885072,0.012529914,0.001836138,0.017920775,0.0078834165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020031996,0.00032860244,0.0006340611,0.0016644258,0.07744,0.013701478,0.012201544,0.012805272,0.001037187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028331842,0.000005517912,0.000068139816,0.000011675094,0.0000014504906,0.00006963853,0.00819225,0.000028439734,0.000020375946,0.98738366,0.0028060395,0.0014099019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038063794,0.00002175206,0.00036806468,0.0004871343,0.000009123442,0.00028676284,0.015585613,0.00019059722,0.00021347078,0.74954677,0.23322761,0.000025160502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007696259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049799606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017920775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008347418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007748139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060565054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W824533568","doi":"","title":"Interpretation & The Internet, 28 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 251 (2010)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); The Internet; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.022178969518380547,"score_gpt":0.282027364190812,"score_spread":0.2598483946724314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W824533568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006026273,0.029418577,0.002534911,0.2793654,0.0008079054,0.000067140114,0.00024908164,0.000084907064,0.6814458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47982964,0.027274407,0.004147817,0.185006,0.003201253,0.00048911304,0.00030614887,0.00019436229,0.29955137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935634,0.0029454129,0.00022166783,0.00055921177,0.0017959793,0.0009142748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99547535,0.003201528,0.00022131947,0.00025004768,0.00062448677,0.00022731132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005948776,0.00073773926,0.00050040765,0.00208386,0.015335294,0.019908395,0.0016262463,0.01872737,0.014123987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013103945,0.00063179235,0.000839078,0.0018685111,0.021190364,0.011510027,0.0038857092,0.010307114,0.0024487088],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008724693,0.000020159081,0.00033058668,0.00003108582,0.000005508333,0.00015343074,0.0021389488,0.00011927247,0.000045807377,0.8837431,0.10820997,0.0051934537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044014207,0.000019571162,0.0013599871,0.0007522343,0.000028722321,0.00014273256,0.005499188,0.0008635593,0.00020723861,0.509496,0.48154408,0.000042750933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08281677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11930392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08281677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015974406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017641488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16466945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W825083229","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1030","title":"Human Dignity and Ecnomic Integrity for Persons with Disabilities: A Commentary on the Supreme Court's Decisions in Granovsky and Martin","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Supreme court; Law; Sociology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.056901249944821375,"score_gpt":0.35657258113704027,"score_spread":0.2996713311922189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W825083229","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018163617,0.0069939387,0.00038071958,0.9766152,0.007757419,0.000017537182,0.000085892054,0.000013890873,0.0063190632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035824362,0.0029986687,0.00064366526,0.94580114,0.008596969,0.00007663487,0.00003010814,0.000042118336,0.005986258],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821845,0.006585078,0.0017691267,0.0025927937,0.0034287209,0.0034397647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92674994,0.06443897,0.0011687573,0.00093832746,0.0043187807,0.0023851995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024802085,0.00087715435,0.003284556,0.0015089486,0.020562693,0.01446381,0.009387156,0.14641204,0.0047797477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066631034,0.0017669323,0.0033704098,0.002218087,0.024588134,0.009038186,0.008457315,0.11115527,0.0011684985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012590154,0.00004245821,0.00040667685,0.0002359972,0.00007179136,0.00087327586,0.0073866155,0.0003027595,0.0002486101,0.3286502,0.6537477,0.007907955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003462573,0.00009731268,0.0019135053,0.00421084,0.00034470944,0.0005651614,0.01257618,0.00064224115,0.001003366,0.24640666,0.731523,0.00037087634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.119238436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20997992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88076156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014902611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03058723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2370888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W834402394","doi":"10.29173/mlj873","title":"AB v. Bragg Communications Law's Next Steps: Should Bullying Be a Tort - Or Even a Crime","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.16458486171092718,"score_gpt":0.36104551122936257,"score_spread":0.1964606495184354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W834402394","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03858106,0.003234409,0.0012202633,0.7247208,0.004636615,0.00015971225,0.00054102344,0.00018254518,0.22672364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20521237,0.001762374,0.0026623022,0.6449283,0.0014504762,0.00014116637,0.00018656702,0.000069232934,0.14358719],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655426,0.00038624788,0.00017713897,0.0003459551,0.0012108312,0.0013255872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938537,0.0024441392,0.00027803486,0.00013748703,0.001993313,0.0012932258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031783143,0.0005349057,0.00046236595,0.0011132689,0.01355495,0.0057576746,0.0020191292,0.026824184,0.008672759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01067662,0.00053043495,0.0005809438,0.0007370421,0.0041143876,0.0024129797,0.0019609914,0.015342661,0.0014736216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009074508,0.00011865689,0.013709158,0.00010270435,0.000036514248,0.0013567257,0.003412591,0.00026192705,0.0022472125,0.23076287,0.72559184,0.022309147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002568556,0.0002317012,0.036362015,0.00094004604,0.00029244673,0.00084151066,0.0109939575,0.0020542815,0.0050278883,0.06879558,0.87389237,0.00031136372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6574038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79679096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6574038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009352704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041356012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6892276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W88627892","doi":"10.29173/alr80","title":"&lt;i&gt;Daniels v. Canada&lt;/i&gt;: The Inevitable Comes to Pass, At Last","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Law; Economics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01316486980816561,"score_gpt":0.2537119165509631,"score_spread":0.24054704674279748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W88627892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009301852,0.010118894,0.0012063538,0.29133677,0.002024913,0.000088951,0.0021416827,0.0001767806,0.6836038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19703276,0.0076383213,0.002126212,0.20340176,0.00076089485,0.00009189306,0.00075042463,0.00017068595,0.58802706],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930066,0.0003996667,0.00013914627,0.0004584518,0.0036211796,0.0023749997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950682,0.0013139496,0.0001728863,0.00013816428,0.00261704,0.00068978657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003134466,0.00047870912,0.00044915892,0.0014438686,0.016518002,0.00854705,0.002258798,0.012747366,0.026711442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010432728,0.00058612204,0.00063004525,0.0018711362,0.006190176,0.0027033442,0.0013933557,0.00807302,0.0026487994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033202927,0.0000108423965,0.0010910867,0.0000776453,0.000011536992,0.00021877121,0.0007791297,0.00012809913,0.00024517806,0.24986161,0.7403551,0.007187821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041701114,0.000019623025,0.0069492287,0.00029488502,0.000059100137,0.000116230374,0.0023827944,0.00037522704,0.0009157498,0.03388053,0.9548706,0.00009440662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96953493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9884947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040497806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040497806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10859965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29383355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W88914411","doi":"10.7202/1068173ar","title":"LEARNING FROM THE YEAN AND BOSICO CASE: CAN THE REPARATION MEASURES ORDERED IN THE GUAYUBÍN CASE REALLY PRODUCE POSITIVE CHANGES?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Human rights; Political science; The Republic; Psychology; Law; Sociology; History; Epistemology; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03182424916457292,"score_gpt":0.2815330104807199,"score_spread":0.24970876131614697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W88914411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7688195,0.0024153234,0.0017074588,0.09211129,0.00016422248,0.00008614918,0.000083783496,0.000012837826,0.13459949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933222,0.00060280814,0.00029017037,0.0026365484,0.00008786407,0.000019459607,0.000013671842,0.0000033536992,0.003023899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965323,0.001957313,0.00006924561,0.0002501197,0.00042146537,0.000769513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922374,0.0050625796,0.0014963265,0.00022963788,0.0006848677,0.0002892342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007311965,0.00022631565,0.0003812672,0.00089844986,0.0052412925,0.004239741,0.0007115944,0.0033959781,0.004292017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023286885,0.00014749067,0.0001627651,0.0010305915,0.008277334,0.0035187907,0.0016858324,0.003932898,0.0002624279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035398084,0.00022529635,0.08673896,0.00022623659,0.00006165995,0.009380426,0.06162087,0.0037349712,0.0013949169,0.7490678,0.018384755,0.068810135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021555883,0.000779631,0.1452705,0.0012733544,0.00013961115,0.0020572918,0.2529806,0.006773431,0.0075753625,0.34451517,0.23807329,0.0003462858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048309777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08092278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048309777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008509533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056805583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09605718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W889274989","doi":"10.58948/2331-3536.1358","title":"Fleeing Cuba: A Comparative Piece Focused on Toro and the Options Victims of Domestic Violence Have in Seeking Citizenship in the United States and Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pace international law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eleventh; Citizenship; Political science; Domestic violence; Refugee; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Environmental health","score_opus":0.055198785593370145,"score_gpt":0.3507085574064305,"score_spread":0.2955097718130603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W889274989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5141907,0.041364968,0.0002565874,0.07286134,0.0009815189,0.00012986331,0.0004948699,0.000010051491,0.36971018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9361455,0.022704525,0.00020337608,0.008430356,0.00013357229,0.00006482671,0.00020500264,0.000024417921,0.03208843],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975073,0.00066188385,0.000051302966,0.00013180386,0.00033995498,0.0013078059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826944,0.000671595,0.00011245249,0.000055911434,0.000589939,0.0003007276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022409363,0.000626364,0.00064050744,0.0035134426,0.034544893,0.009380831,0.0020063356,0.0031862918,0.004830902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004337021,0.0003249215,0.0005006624,0.0058252956,0.009097418,0.0030454814,0.0029867312,0.005282471,0.00019841205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019368768,0.00015539663,0.02282828,0.0005570861,0.00008945166,0.003853749,0.6760414,0.00030618894,0.00054989744,0.19682685,0.05711109,0.04148683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010222458,0.000017420554,0.021729924,0.00065629446,0.000052438027,0.00022000709,0.8665142,0.000055968234,0.00020356294,0.0012725501,0.1092304,0.000037100075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9796805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9933523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.082145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07214118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59600645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W89025490","doi":"10.21991/c9zm2m","title":"Drivers Needed: Tough Choices from Alberta v. Wilson Colony of Hutterian Brethren","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.031467329142535354,"score_gpt":0.26442471498762216,"score_spread":0.2329573858450868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W89025490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047769133,0.002584703,0.0005138487,0.16021079,0.0017686484,0.00018614919,0.0010875703,0.00009189156,0.7857872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35402045,0.0017471344,0.0011518201,0.1524568,0.00035188865,0.00014021217,0.00090725237,0.00011308066,0.4891113],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943711,0.00041435836,0.00009799092,0.00025778468,0.0028094798,0.0020493097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99569666,0.0010104234,0.00011536003,0.00017207258,0.0015626262,0.0014427907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041373027,0.0005095471,0.0004524737,0.0012590903,0.020680655,0.008555758,0.0023783771,0.009712176,0.020984858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008112729,0.00071912544,0.0004596469,0.0014848913,0.002973808,0.001989809,0.0032116966,0.009453023,0.0016446022],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001134695,0.00008805627,0.007479192,0.00006228667,0.000023460057,0.0014126925,0.0058096224,0.0004817276,0.0005135506,0.22915293,0.7337653,0.02109784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010529212,0.000049049042,0.031516008,0.0002936637,0.00006361665,0.0002176037,0.014707005,0.0005690404,0.00063763704,0.03216407,0.91944087,0.00023607707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.945367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9893745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05463302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03521347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09666401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2554928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W93319703","doi":"","title":"Abortion Law in Transnational Perspective: Cases and Controversies - Introduction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Law; Political science; Abortion law; Adjudication; Human rights; Economic Justice; Reproductive justice; Constitutional law; Sociology; Family planning; Population","score_opus":0.00582589689883734,"score_gpt":0.27038075956008767,"score_spread":0.26455486266125033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W93319703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021975987,0.34629327,0.006514655,0.1346404,0.009373792,0.00018711528,0.0002703,0.00009588629,0.4806486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4520105,0.33536217,0.0094891675,0.08024871,0.018269159,0.00068046583,0.0006707815,0.00027053527,0.102998465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958884,0.0024808138,0.00022251584,0.00034451703,0.00073354854,0.00033024594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940229,0.00504675,0.00023490592,0.00024760806,0.00029205115,0.000155782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004151896,0.00056191295,0.00073269743,0.0029626682,0.004729846,0.01078797,0.0017414404,0.007937059,0.0063533573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008102329,0.00038476055,0.0006073496,0.0065038386,0.013559616,0.011063851,0.0065085846,0.007940082,0.0010662981],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012254073,0.000034274668,0.00032650415,0.00037690293,0.0000064449596,0.0007984288,0.014577145,0.00019997035,0.00017370163,0.912476,0.051072624,0.01994585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045277857,0.000038081533,0.0008872857,0.0020520443,0.00000885025,0.0016109251,0.019602453,0.00037330357,0.00017682886,0.118774444,0.85644263,0.00002866584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036533924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054894825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01078797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045776065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018276776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03321302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W933989094","doi":"","title":"Moral Issues of the Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Divergent/Convergent","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02512600169301227,"score_gpt":0.29502739143357126,"score_spread":0.269901389740559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W933989094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057597443,0.008091441,0.03134508,0.19371179,0.0011555837,0.00007152533,0.000121826946,0.000044316406,0.707861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772767,0.00064560375,0.004415746,0.005595236,0.0011732659,0.000090855676,0.000032765427,0.000042205622,0.010727583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834368,0.010306087,0.00034671449,0.0016146611,0.0033729125,0.0009228322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98040664,0.013215717,0.00093565264,0.0021364347,0.002258754,0.0010468574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014408614,0.00047981335,0.00081704283,0.0019783785,0.007085618,0.0118466765,0.0023882634,0.009629273,0.0066453544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03807692,0.00039106287,0.0005887507,0.0014290614,0.06651264,0.011514064,0.0038527327,0.013155313,0.0005786118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002363561,0.000007005345,0.00005893809,0.0000043632244,0.0000014409974,0.000006980557,0.0005670827,0.000044736207,0.000012516661,0.99755716,0.00085732836,0.0008799884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005765194,0.0000018092026,0.0001124174,0.000012727164,0.0000011707923,0.000009010918,0.00033506437,0.00014768606,0.000016603006,0.9956982,0.0036575333,0.0000020584152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002719376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021024384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014408614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055222157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005657609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07620096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W95103866","doi":"","title":"Is the End of the War in Sight: An Analysis of Canada’s Decriminalization of Marijuana and the Implications for the United States “War on Drugs”","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decriminalization; Sight; Political science; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.018129716369439594,"score_gpt":0.28251902145048485,"score_spread":0.26438930508104524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W95103866","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38493967,0.0061182836,0.00090682827,0.17370878,0.00033933768,0.000112908485,0.0005137253,0.000023123555,0.43333736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728793,0.002215473,0.00028214674,0.008516561,0.00006133286,0.000015378157,0.00007487518,0.000022120948,0.015932843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99183977,0.0006721573,0.00008613316,0.0002096091,0.0023955011,0.0047969026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914625,0.002132702,0.00072545966,0.00015490536,0.0039507365,0.0015735362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031299295,0.00026041476,0.00038633423,0.0033072946,0.036385342,0.012632851,0.0020153997,0.0043605766,0.0050579896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012797205,0.0003342082,0.00070289784,0.0059128655,0.017142434,0.003077423,0.0028176096,0.0057507125,0.00023591888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011924825,0.0000681191,0.028409217,0.00011169651,0.00004323089,0.0009891475,0.07883893,0.0008097969,0.00033949388,0.8044678,0.057344116,0.028459273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006192744,0.000066002314,0.15939862,0.00072514365,0.00019778113,0.00034556055,0.41530475,0.0024833032,0.00095358427,0.06673641,0.35354054,0.00018638819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9935156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8442297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1557703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24973002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9791868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W9841700","doi":"10.29173/alr56","title":"Canada's Next Step in Tobacco Control Laws: Is Plain Packaging Legislation a Viable Proposal?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislation; Law; Tobacco control; Order (exchange); Business; Perspective (graphical); Division (mathematics); Political science; Mathematics; Medicine; Public health","score_opus":0.013340609130144855,"score_gpt":0.26020956365946507,"score_spread":0.24686895452932023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W9841700","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015758768,0.018053874,0.0027914708,0.8089647,0.0036956389,0.00022877454,0.0006335485,0.0001728517,0.14970048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29629835,0.016226944,0.016288575,0.5761389,0.0014950526,0.00025862374,0.0007171911,0.00011440407,0.09246188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98305804,0.0017972541,0.0004983413,0.0012494781,0.009637855,0.0037591117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834366,0.0046567977,0.00046071928,0.00069317856,0.008660251,0.0020924367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011497842,0.00057061395,0.0007480764,0.0018752295,0.014283793,0.0120763155,0.0048061023,0.018226841,0.0057979976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028773751,0.00065719814,0.0014148349,0.002168828,0.010926959,0.005167824,0.0024455728,0.011897525,0.000676523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050596027,0.00008921761,0.0019199708,0.0003277311,0.00004403567,0.000332928,0.001932608,0.0004442892,0.0007029465,0.75073344,0.20649436,0.036927916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022238275,0.000102444705,0.008687656,0.00094003923,0.00021994182,0.0001480791,0.002841033,0.001214907,0.0010518586,0.07393666,0.91044647,0.00018843757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9760342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9816658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06719827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06719827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33798575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48755985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}