{"meta":{"query_hash":"2ee5566a521c","filters":{"topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes"},"cohort_total":780,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":780,"exported":780,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2ee5566a521c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Legal+Systems+and+Judicial+Processes"},"results":[{"id":"W1000343132","doi":"","title":"James Madison Has Left the Building","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University of Chicago Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliamentary sovereignty; Nullification; Law; Legislation; Political science; Statutory law; State (computer science); Democracy; Judicial review; Constitution; Legislature; Sovereignty; Federalism; Politics","score_opus":0.02876443821679884,"score_gpt":0.2704875496667374,"score_spread":0.24172311144993855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1000343132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008593055,0.19099422,0.0001816895,0.31037438,0.00016677409,0.00084718753,0.0000066096673,0.000087487075,0.4887486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96151274,0.034770537,0.000075743505,0.001977438,0.00020393498,1.2693994e-7,4.1047662e-7,0.0000036510844,0.0014554221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991549,0.00025166405,0.00010592433,0.000095012394,0.00024470134,0.00014780089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994535,0.0001309354,0.00012508337,0.00018289524,0.00006507824,0.000042495776],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009992525,0.000060634924,0.00018729988,0.000007557699,0.0014096642,0.000028081979,0.00061442517,0.000035548685,0.0005022164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006962828,0.00003693375,0.000105400315,0.00015069803,0.00081415055,0.00017290068,0.00006543383,0.000115908726,0.00007072087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072689572,0.000029851963,0.00006876713,0.000465619,0.00003976356,0.0000013940028,0.013341305,0.000006685624,0.000027324966,0.916881,0.046031985,0.023099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047998772,0.0000070542997,0.000049437178,0.00068292045,0.000058914877,8.4232846e-7,0.00086658105,0.0000023567816,0.000014750293,0.00094012974,0.9972763,0.000052719555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016498303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011503005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95291966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003526389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000881787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1019748629","doi":"","title":"Compensation for mental injury under the Montreal Convention: A paradigm shift","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European transport law: = Droit européen des transports = Europäisches Transportrecht = Diritto europeo dei trasporti = Derecho europeo de transportes = Europees vervoerrecht","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Paradigm shift; Compensation (psychology); Convention; Law; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.024697993521142266,"score_gpt":0.2624626091592792,"score_spread":0.23776461563813694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1019748629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5392775,0.0070915273,0.0991227,0.007219206,0.004427205,0.016342713,0.0024026772,0.006697462,0.31741902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752557,0.0053525018,0.0016884506,0.0040656906,0.0018869251,0.00053213653,0.0026255648,0.0017237654,0.006869265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9778422,0.003477527,0.00592519,0.0042685266,0.0033882707,0.0050982814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906994,0.00079241395,0.0018929583,0.00278061,0.0011498362,0.0026847897],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072153388,0.003239258,0.0028711332,0.0007771766,0.0053282166,0.0012329603,0.00471937,0.0007228591,0.0025600945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012143085,0.0030096034,0.0026673502,0.003257088,0.005359399,0.0039441176,0.000077054334,0.0028563456,0.0010714268],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010387231,0.013515079,0.13889377,0.0056952224,0.0073149446,0.015931766,0.14717986,0.004638778,0.015429542,0.4589403,0.0114599755,0.17061353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044518905,0.00090514455,0.4331241,0.0009100531,0.002003782,0.00018707543,0.00178051,0.00008322776,0.0006405694,0.005043126,0.54723275,0.0036377592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0137419095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0206163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5357728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052533596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010592844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1020271015","doi":"","title":"Guide to MC001 - The Walter L. Oblinger, Jr. Papers","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.014557796429054007,"score_gpt":0.31423674029238896,"score_spread":0.29967894386333493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1020271015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013549822,0.0001071553,0.00006130703,0.044830978,0.00044534449,0.00036251795,3.58571e-7,0.000083476814,0.940559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8254018,0.000032230728,0.0001270696,0.0063527054,0.00085649785,0.000048022393,1.672976e-7,0.0000063655225,0.16717517],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999075,0.00006198213,0.00014873629,0.00013671204,0.00029475123,0.00028281932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994903,0.0000908298,0.00002950927,0.00013088486,0.00012138291,0.00013707587],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043708927,0.000063274834,0.000084501626,0.000019796493,0.00055592094,0.00024443062,0.00029906246,0.00004631118,0.0037006366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026884404,0.000035383764,0.000038923496,0.00025908567,0.00008492667,0.00019834962,0.000042802654,0.000056590256,0.0023935486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002941118,0.00003198126,0.0012034522,0.000009706079,0.000019717949,0.0000013235996,0.016909897,0.0000069026187,0.0013709639,0.09631263,0.84167707,0.042453412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039839182,0.000012813366,0.0006519581,0.0000069765883,0.0000025468335,1.2139482e-7,0.004459164,0.0000029465918,0.00006261603,0.0011161455,0.9935704,0.0000744572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2072926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017499374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8118519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034288147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008774035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1024819059","doi":"","title":"The Disturbed Legislation of Same-sex Marriage in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"读与写:教育教学刊","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.027184488699442916,"score_gpt":0.24566679797267707,"score_spread":0.21848230927323414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1024819059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46259204,0.0005947592,0.000028635384,0.0009937625,0.00080975064,0.0003223816,0.000009651195,0.000020144236,0.53462887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980601,0.000042941945,0.000013968151,0.000058738267,0.00015097011,0.000008374651,9.5344024e-7,0.0000045678157,0.0016593916],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907887,0.00013146248,0.00020720127,0.00009868774,0.00028375303,0.00020002662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995654,0.000116625066,0.000108635126,0.00010997856,0.000050748447,0.000048587484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005803566,0.000054012682,0.00011293066,0.00001705755,0.0002700502,0.000021677906,0.00021028596,0.00003793234,0.0000920411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024777264,0.00003906347,0.000022114089,0.00021368578,0.000104087456,0.00012207615,0.00002051837,0.0000802041,0.0000054272214],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009386341,0.0000989299,0.5868215,0.00007161185,0.00005290557,0.000021623697,0.13770224,0.000011604057,0.0003254009,0.20652425,0.015235043,0.05304105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005469539,0.00005949564,0.37281942,0.000096412026,0.000018925519,5.8127046e-7,0.04721571,0.000052773743,0.0013087376,0.023407754,0.5540876,0.0003856229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99866486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5388526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016125616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091868057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2077035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1038600807","doi":"","title":"Unnatural Law: Rethinking Canadian Environmental Law and Policy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.0073172990539150445,"score_gpt":0.19330297224360196,"score_spread":0.18598567318968692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1038600807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5383152,0.00014939754,0.0000052651017,0.0006990325,0.000120244666,0.00008918903,0.000029514295,0.000029939629,0.4605622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976375,0.000018587762,0.000046495115,0.00018830693,0.00017748037,7.070239e-8,0.0000059368363,0.000006365143,0.0019192189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919605,0.000023707107,0.000085102336,0.00018782115,0.0002626447,0.00024464543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995063,0.000021212265,0.00008277747,0.00009703825,0.000026030832,0.00026665014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000072656294,0.0000838522,0.00012998274,0.000060008926,0.0012227552,0.00016825955,0.0002031376,0.00010930963,0.000008306671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015410153,0.000106697975,0.00005673495,0.00011751828,0.00072791206,0.0011709854,0.000060551385,0.00010675078,0.000013014709],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027200858,0.00005239411,0.0054440023,0.000031336094,0.00005730472,0.000270599,0.034039278,0.00001704493,0.0006634402,0.95804536,0.00016193716,0.0011901194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002193767,0.00038870968,0.03345326,0.0003927518,0.000100462865,0.00012348202,0.0767716,0.000012649623,0.0009954101,0.092039235,0.7921739,0.0013547735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79642975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53098685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86600614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004036111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002855533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9404568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W106247267","doi":"","title":"An Economic Assessment of Same-Sex Marriage Laws","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard journal of law & public policy/Harvard journal of law and public policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Sanctions; Institution; Family law; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Lesbian; Law; Law and economics; Social psychology; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.024278939390909367,"score_gpt":0.331284516279577,"score_spread":0.30700557688866764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W106247267","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3026725,0.0008183157,0.00077749,0.028699985,0.00205055,0.0005940291,0.00034730486,0.0000834807,0.66395634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807761,0.0010623877,0.0007755791,0.002794999,0.013956705,0.0000047489,0.000007903381,0.00006888852,0.00055271067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99193025,0.0013234263,0.0032121753,0.00036603987,0.0017330351,0.0014350533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908932,0.0004591773,0.0046434468,0.00048158746,0.0017775433,0.0017450545],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073997397,0.0005381692,0.001756417,0.0013580149,0.0010202348,0.0019400984,0.0017718828,0.00045478667,0.0006962397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006622178,0.0004606654,0.00073737476,0.00079861545,0.0015294018,0.0062296945,0.00017138798,0.0009892902,0.000030172481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006794651,0.0004699379,0.004921244,0.00008054595,0.0003231176,0.000057110505,0.0012188064,0.00003693764,0.00052584003,0.98489046,0.0044274083,0.0029806418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002097489,0.00080026797,0.0038690402,0.00016013866,0.000112862646,0.0006150948,0.0007405467,0.00002562907,0.00017205473,0.052639984,0.9383073,0.00045963255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15167114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015793307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93387985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010720983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010479822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W113836864","doi":"","title":"The Evolution of Same Sex Marriage Law in Canada: Lessons for the U.S","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Journal of Gender & Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sex discrimination; Law reform; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.028914507932121965,"score_gpt":0.28810532761018554,"score_spread":0.25919081967806357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W113836864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6027579,0.04129785,0.003797754,0.16364118,0.0049844445,0.0018988271,0.000086406886,0.000028829501,0.18150683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986816,0.00008545116,0.00002889933,0.0005672766,0.00045409353,0.0000015249467,1.6019625e-7,0.000004634789,0.00017633765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877167,0.0001376391,0.00039326661,0.00006959236,0.00038313773,0.00024470317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905485,0.00029265138,0.00031642965,0.00009463486,0.00017592571,0.000065496664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014465144,0.00006857714,0.00018040383,0.000018441591,0.0006345591,0.00005377416,0.00037912588,0.00003960702,0.0000066523426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000087918466,0.00003948293,0.0000797427,0.00015814201,0.00016703508,0.00014392506,0.000010477744,0.00014100352,2.617495e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049525705,0.000025941328,0.00056661427,0.000011184601,0.00004189322,0.000005067979,0.011690773,0.00012096086,0.00051426963,0.983811,0.0013799849,0.0017827867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014340417,0.00027949235,0.022296196,0.00017042841,0.00012704912,0.000028473767,0.16140552,0.00009352452,0.0015341203,0.2610019,0.551292,0.00033723854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86443204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99477273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7228091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002718289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016420794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48805797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W114757845","doi":"10.29173/alr121","title":"The Changing Regulatory Scheme in Northeast British Columbia","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Negotiation; Hydraulic fracturing; Government (linguistics); Boom; Environmental law; Business; Redress; Petroleum industry; Jurisprudence; Natural resource; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.023721149658074637,"score_gpt":0.26155335985384837,"score_spread":0.23783221019577372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W114757845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03358818,0.18089573,8.411541e-7,0.0016519981,0.00045712973,0.00095519604,0.0000014878768,0.00004041305,0.782409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9554957,0.032619324,0.0000147654855,0.0017998985,0.00021391564,0.00008016111,0.0000011335642,0.000013546121,0.009761519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880224,0.00016493091,0.00028150433,0.00017068048,0.00021897917,0.0003616517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994546,0.000109472334,0.00010432658,0.00018518249,0.00006686896,0.00007951856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012127556,0.000059124468,0.00021591217,0.000006942227,0.00086131395,0.00018557449,0.0002992151,0.00005103004,0.00042923572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027937058,0.00006420766,0.00006799948,0.0004226999,0.00023693104,0.00021577862,0.000044289616,0.000095013245,0.00009150685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043708656,0.00012591267,0.09345629,0.0020261244,0.000052377327,0.000034508652,0.013111307,1.9616897e-8,0.0000017227527,0.76985407,0.023556832,0.09777649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049127415,0.000006573329,0.0029216134,0.0027413245,0.000009778212,0.0000030107574,0.00026161727,3.6080723e-7,4.3865805e-7,0.00089798,0.9930009,0.0001072445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91332304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98742884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9694441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037462636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000975099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66246176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W11616365","doi":"10.21991/c9s084","title":"FURTHER RESTRICTINGS ON ACCESS TO CHARTER REVIEW: A COMMENT ON HY AND ZEL'S INC. V. ONTARIO (A.G.)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.06074538259970911,"score_gpt":0.3081228134511146,"score_spread":0.24737743085140548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W11616365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011906343,0.0018708912,0.0024951636,0.12952685,0.0029819815,0.0030298245,0.00012528211,0.00029754496,0.8477661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9445799,0.0004202,0.00014166492,0.053680018,0.00022921631,0.00019591945,0.000023213457,0.000010828636,0.00071904156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972954,0.000119330034,0.00054367876,0.0005988264,0.0007130171,0.0007297946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985403,0.00014616949,0.0002145971,0.0003014757,0.00033247637,0.0004650164],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006713526,0.0003289006,0.00041787527,0.00021905627,0.002006313,0.0001993074,0.00048442572,0.00018201792,0.00074851536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005089637,0.0002939474,0.00011644189,0.00042467442,0.0022247578,0.00077774335,0.00019716012,0.00034864037,0.00043134968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009853702,0.00016729573,0.018533124,0.000047483718,0.000039860613,0.000019619101,0.0015443414,0.0000062762374,0.0000043073014,0.90569437,0.072540745,0.0013040503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005882153,0.00022203993,0.002290407,0.0015383023,0.000043067175,0.000020132744,0.00085525325,0.0000025242962,0.000051165713,0.0072125643,0.98674154,0.00043477857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05091535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046675187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9326736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000528566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016287849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1193139268","doi":"","title":"Attorney-Client Privileged Documents: Federal District Court Limits the Scope of Attorney-Client Privilege Granted Involving In-House Counsel","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Law & Medicine","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; False Claims Act; Waiver; Statute; Government (linguistics); Political science; Legal advice; Medicaid; Plaintiff; Damages; Privilege (computing); Medicine; Health care","score_opus":0.018150789315568027,"score_gpt":0.299806196081922,"score_spread":0.281655406766354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1193139268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96037734,0.0043890793,0.0001926884,0.013016902,0.0013715159,0.0008600294,0.000005707089,0.000045869812,0.019740863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99443233,0.0025879652,0.000069469665,0.0016684824,0.0010581581,0.000018013863,0.0000015096989,0.000036443224,0.00012763751],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953146,0.00061507436,0.0014920367,0.00026857608,0.0016894961,0.00062023307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99594635,0.00066555635,0.0019022472,0.0002865632,0.00088464323,0.00031462646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025044598,0.00027790334,0.0010087251,0.00015424994,0.00048850785,0.00010481833,0.0008224816,0.00007538477,0.00019304678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008348067,0.00017072324,0.00015791916,0.0010062597,0.0024479616,0.00066246244,0.000048241436,0.0005225942,0.000018863871],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016165804,0.0040078512,0.29995868,0.0008455792,0.0018485925,0.00059499306,0.30176163,0.0003252104,0.022784408,0.110700935,0.18438339,0.07117213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0089360885,0.0074592456,0.11017685,0.008701358,0.00048942666,0.00015573486,0.0812451,0.00008604209,0.0013135856,0.002089035,0.7779152,0.0014323518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07385299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01101115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5935318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000311014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004529349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9323143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1195034990","doi":"","title":"Civil Procedure - Second Circuit Upholds Extraterritorial Reach over Foreign Financial Institution under the Anti-Terrorism Act","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Plaintiff; Terrorism; Damages; Political science; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Personal jurisdiction; Constitution; State (computer science); Sociology","score_opus":0.023192761975116487,"score_gpt":0.2854697569323346,"score_spread":0.2622769949572181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1195034990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041568257,0.030783216,0.0033295536,0.03675571,0.008385152,0.0047532395,0.00021089251,0.00037899122,0.87383497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992739,0.0008888305,0.000009755001,0.0027942446,0.0031183683,0.000107208616,0.000052029067,0.00001616891,0.00027438166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975359,0.00033572374,0.000495484,0.00035677032,0.0009161889,0.00035996543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991263,0.00014206104,0.00018057151,0.00018629781,0.0002510076,0.00011375092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015665159,0.00021033897,0.0003726109,0.00003216324,0.0010894787,0.00015861003,0.00041022184,0.00021510544,0.00084977364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014481189,0.00015349619,0.00020149638,0.00039121154,0.0003441738,0.0007161643,0.000013602182,0.00026108196,0.000023111923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005382266,0.000047039997,0.00012022123,0.00066355045,0.00001405451,0.000001015606,0.00038694587,0.000003687734,0.00004439851,0.9956851,0.0025208155,0.0005077943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003264611,0.000034774384,0.0026315022,0.00039107684,0.000063356936,0.0000040680297,0.000037286103,0.0000048266666,0.000026678004,0.0720357,0.9242143,0.00022997211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001419343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020713758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95117074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001297315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000814756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99715567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W121911457","doi":"","title":"Legal Issues Arising From the Health Care Reform Issue","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; Politics; Health care; State (computer science); Employee Retirement Income Security Act; Political science; Liability insurance; Health care reform; Law; Law and economics; Insurance policy; Economics; Health policy; Pension","score_opus":0.04157606531804298,"score_gpt":0.3365920831101973,"score_spread":0.2950160177921543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W121911457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014281989,0.00561486,0.00006381393,0.01608513,0.000729632,0.00022422484,0.0000073206947,0.00014536444,0.96284765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903351,0.00015994975,0.0003310388,0.0022473997,0.0017718913,0.000004697408,0.0000029815985,0.000007866924,0.0051390952],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898547,0.000109285735,0.0001792991,0.00015968872,0.00028904984,0.00027722126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995663,0.000031640186,0.000079650395,0.0001547499,0.00009083522,0.000076827644],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038773008,0.00007553636,0.00014066667,0.000012465439,0.0010456891,0.00013511663,0.000296276,0.00006161898,0.0009662028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053780026,0.000044655808,0.000040245784,0.00015724348,0.00013279979,0.00032167675,0.00003845033,0.0001033304,0.00019040651],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001554208,0.000028584807,0.0034599712,0.000018521043,0.000023340386,0.000003832671,0.5864713,6.9539965e-8,0.00000632332,0.33800083,0.044093207,0.027878443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045855133,0.000034760753,0.001092563,0.000023126135,0.0000033113804,1.2699498e-7,0.1689761,3.6546402e-7,0.000116761286,0.002208605,0.82742554,0.000072867144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94070274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36910427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9760531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016229448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002954035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1235290971","doi":"","title":"The Loadstone Rock: The Role of Harm in the Criminalization of Plural Unions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Harm; Law; Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Sociology; Mores; Criminology; History; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.028028749304842775,"score_gpt":0.2986093494421076,"score_spread":0.2705806001372648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1235290971","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5640972,0.01026985,0.00020077042,0.019413587,0.0010727129,0.0013710696,0.00002234544,0.00006377617,0.40348864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987671,0.00006894099,0.000007056259,0.00023175968,0.00024788163,0.000019084995,0.0000017000281,0.0000052938876,0.0006511814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850106,0.0004206252,0.00026889265,0.00009572041,0.0005196653,0.00019405739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990543,0.00026772096,0.00017014967,0.00021400968,0.00023534967,0.00005848413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018084043,0.00006750269,0.00012506066,0.000017527262,0.00051148614,0.000082465456,0.00056225556,0.000057686793,0.000023148465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065468793,0.000033675286,0.000046602483,0.00042863534,0.00030264456,0.00020762642,0.000043215412,0.00014013406,0.000018196426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002519511,0.000056086046,0.0041891444,0.0000118329435,0.000011234501,6.164356e-7,0.031542618,0.00013884075,0.00030195143,0.9609848,0.0021093455,0.0006282888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004607057,0.000113949834,0.0039768657,0.00010550512,0.00004530054,0.000001757437,0.16669829,0.000139768,0.0027641808,0.08853565,0.7369907,0.00016732243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11003961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06614233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8724492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039296177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026818377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9508982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1238124","doi":"10.29173/alr275","title":"Canada (A.G.) v. PHS Community Services Society — The Insite Decision","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Lease; Forbearance; Public administration","score_opus":0.021542994379209802,"score_gpt":0.29997823915292093,"score_spread":0.2784352447737111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1238124","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03829501,0.37465784,0.0000074198424,0.02299881,0.0013294459,0.0011546693,0.000011085339,0.00004560238,0.56150013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9433921,0.023127222,0.000016672893,0.032404024,0.0003807563,0.000021201675,0.0000052471546,0.000009187851,0.00064359535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833125,0.00054444984,0.00025720414,0.000088054905,0.0004269725,0.00035204637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982572,0.0010007904,0.00013815615,0.0003435665,0.000105863364,0.00015439259],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018258673,0.000111914946,0.000254237,0.0000025625131,0.0019879057,0.00006761261,0.0005630121,0.00005651621,0.00019833428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018252566,0.000068762594,0.00010525951,0.00030889397,0.00013920033,0.00041376794,0.000110184745,0.00024685982,0.000072904484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006124691,0.00017722952,0.0123189865,0.005646706,0.0001496927,9.207326e-7,0.039187912,7.507483e-7,0.000007374696,0.62141305,0.2780596,0.04303163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036124304,0.0000037400528,0.0006443874,0.0011721065,0.00004031293,9.957049e-7,0.0008062229,5.9672095e-7,0.000003105786,0.000275482,0.9969166,0.00010033674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9991171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90509707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010666338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035826568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W133852656","doi":"","title":"Judicial Selection and Democratic Theory: Demand, Supply, and Life Tenure","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Adjudication; Political science; Separation of powers; Law; Judicial review; Judicial independence; Constitution; Judicial activism; Accountability; Legitimacy; Rule of law; Supreme court; Politics","score_opus":0.00943560439557363,"score_gpt":0.26658545450579074,"score_spread":0.2571498501102171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W133852656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79469776,0.003050235,0.0018473025,0.014742192,0.00023708848,0.00049434043,0.0000027362485,0.00021092262,0.1847174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954755,0.00023253191,0.00017968759,0.000687168,0.001146985,0.000006920018,4.814991e-7,0.0000059918716,0.0022647686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922967,0.00012024671,0.00012687131,0.00015776911,0.00017102581,0.0001944183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999628,0.000094945826,0.000041776606,0.00003236084,0.000052970092,0.00014992374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061744027,0.00007291973,0.00012637254,0.000035534922,0.00066584727,0.00012162117,0.00004027244,0.00009049486,0.00018908297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002733697,0.000058884503,0.000014743909,0.00016011696,0.000140552,0.0003086626,0.000018692506,0.00007362992,0.000015380685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008737014,0.00008761079,0.079001874,0.00007177672,0.00006832562,0.0000029908,0.022686644,0.00001151269,0.0005491881,0.7721399,0.023114465,0.10217832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002074697,0.00041598664,0.05193469,0.00014903091,0.00021442345,0.000030803316,0.018605473,0.00088529254,0.0009970969,0.23123708,0.6922997,0.0011556919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004250585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024718018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6691853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021665744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011137559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99307835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W139234383","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.436480","title":"The Paradox of the Misuse of Administrative Law in ERISA Benefit Claims","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Golder Associates (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Administrative law; Business; Political science; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.022729955400126303,"score_gpt":0.3184111754368146,"score_spread":0.2956812200366883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W139234383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9233073,0.007039864,0.00003628741,0.0022445593,0.0003443236,0.0002589067,0.0000023568218,0.000005526002,0.06676087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99705243,0.0019155733,0.0000037527718,0.000029284947,0.00009042366,0.0000029096589,5.545698e-8,0.0000051132724,0.0009004506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807674,0.00028437274,0.00033911323,0.00007971358,0.00036568986,0.00085434807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926674,0.00015721036,0.0003128317,0.00010580072,0.000119378776,0.000038022805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002725555,0.000070025504,0.00015271213,0.000017805492,0.0005667057,0.000036937603,0.00037172937,0.00006336068,0.000013300609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022147092,0.00003924635,0.00009243965,0.00032566235,0.0003744892,0.00011581501,0.000011605645,0.0006555495,0.0000013502017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018253057,0.00003207831,0.0032421001,0.0000032615942,0.000024523812,3.3930374e-7,0.003183465,0.0000048781794,0.00007400742,0.99267447,0.000017763296,0.0007248713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030464426,0.00016002047,0.00088223076,0.000051640098,0.000013758442,0.000013902125,0.03072572,9.428701e-7,0.0012413977,0.94250345,0.024023894,0.00007839656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006147229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23390351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22775629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024476513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030643602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92928123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W145174559","doi":"","title":"Alberta's New Lobbyist and Conflict of Interest Legislation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12623933283566602,"score_gpt":0.3175506723979309,"score_spread":0.19131133956226487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W145174559","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06001379,0.59284645,0.000025936975,0.03683239,0.0007602075,0.0018521214,0.00005213683,0.00003506647,0.30758187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8935128,0.09866159,0.000029008837,0.0039546574,0.0002492567,0.0000067512788,0.00001367272,0.000008014457,0.0035642935],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992711,0.00006858225,0.00023630985,0.00013306348,0.000098728124,0.00019224879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992781,0.000040878473,0.00009731126,0.00009864458,0.00004555596,0.000439501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019349265,0.00007680867,0.00023636228,0.000041648927,0.00021915068,0.000015634954,0.00011553958,0.000039704995,0.00064241834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001095444,0.000074303774,0.0000393179,0.00018291413,0.00018238298,0.00018862385,0.000008793675,0.000054994172,0.000036011195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066278353,0.000024047773,0.056683727,0.0014990632,0.00008319234,0.000044348326,0.010901165,3.3417606e-7,0.000019412495,0.022827532,0.7989468,0.10896375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007509312,0.000019186724,0.0012476608,0.0009941,0.000020698388,0.0000060739553,0.00021908723,4.4224498e-7,0.0000057821494,0.00010319183,0.997223,0.00008567435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98132145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98161185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83349895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109714245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009662959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70340306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480252542","doi":"","title":"Privacy & Terrorism Review - Where Have We Come in 10 Years?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Patriot Act; Political science; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Law; Presidential system; National security; Business; Population; Privacy laws of the United States; Information privacy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02017663765758389,"score_gpt":0.3186287148046143,"score_spread":0.2984520771470304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480252542","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07024992,0.87327194,0.00011088918,0.019280637,0.0008275189,0.000511227,0.0000015023797,0.000057824163,0.03568854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7902694,0.20267859,0.000008506094,0.00017844075,0.0012404233,0.000006124468,4.953487e-7,0.000012299662,0.0056057633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99664474,0.00027192043,0.00033436745,0.00011830594,0.0004277631,0.0022028943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994326,0.000040579976,0.00019121829,0.00010932527,0.00006407338,0.00016215435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043144263,0.00010931487,0.0002587847,0.000070018184,0.00026029034,0.00006602266,0.00036139408,0.00009704356,0.00042175138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021664477,0.000096751006,0.000092130635,0.0002832244,0.00006705441,0.00064859935,0.00003530813,0.0011494131,0.00020280399],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007523392,0.00066288497,0.11925402,0.0007893274,0.00025738086,0.00003591075,0.050547693,0.0000018787199,0.00009698401,0.50178224,0.034452155,0.2920443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026792067,0.00006578917,0.0013350515,0.00079499284,0.000023045788,0.000043914708,0.0054273335,4.777047e-7,0.0000021698438,0.036089927,0.9557672,0.00018213375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043999352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019692767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9213151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091549486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017352628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482536848","doi":"","title":"A Tale of Three Signatories: Learning from the European Union, Japanese, and Canadian Kyoto Experiences in Crafting a Superior United States Climate Change Regime","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kyoto Protocol; Greenhouse gas; European union; Climate change; Emissions trading; Climate change mitigation; Renewable energy; Political science; International trade; Business; Economy; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.016727232846526285,"score_gpt":0.2476527710087194,"score_spread":0.23092553816219313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482536848","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98842484,0.005139121,0.00001336188,0.003460698,0.000071464754,0.00016511588,0.0000025778359,0.000017478142,0.0027053626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99567467,0.0036943175,0.0000032243067,0.00013925957,0.00042169957,0.0000052727332,0.000003697627,0.0000101949,0.0000476796],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972798,0.0007199689,0.00027613307,0.00015363048,0.00025945553,0.001311019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999401,0.00011961782,0.00016499961,0.000065743385,0.000116632145,0.0001320231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004348806,0.00010966161,0.00017518645,0.00012616995,0.0009799063,0.00016590492,0.00029415527,0.00005142649,0.000015655647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029120516,0.000081751474,0.000031048472,0.00065356377,0.0001845773,0.00037558255,0.000020956957,0.0007228923,0.0000016955851],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028917597,0.000030105995,0.13034931,0.000009052184,0.000039029896,0.000026003438,0.82693726,0.00003965098,0.00014265123,0.01668354,0.000023522927,0.025690988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040457337,0.00032746806,0.022120198,0.00024291936,0.00001618912,0.000017005746,0.945995,0.0000782145,0.000012161091,0.021132354,0.009416985,0.00023692891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7433719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90800077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1646289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028502062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009445457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75367457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483029253","doi":"","title":"Why the Development of Mass Torts in Canada Is Important to Corporate America: Not Only Are American Manufacturers Liable to Suit in Canada, but That Nation's Class Action Regime Is Developing the Potential for Increased Exposure","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Class action; Punitive damages; Law; Jury; Supreme court; Product liability; Political science; Business; Liability; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.033356526601454266,"score_gpt":0.25253559787557256,"score_spread":0.2191790712741183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483029253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96249986,0.000083132625,0.00251647,0.03365502,0.00054714887,0.0005798605,0.000058859714,0.000005349501,0.000054289965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834243,0.00007360295,0.000552325,0.015692128,0.00015450646,0.000035085362,0.0000032274688,0.000015651065,0.000049143313],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973409,0.00013386828,0.00063719304,0.00024181246,0.0011354011,0.00051077997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815565,0.00012787014,0.0009394714,0.00013347309,0.0004302709,0.00021326028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009907563,0.00018188012,0.00033861655,0.00011442927,0.0007353487,0.00013723664,0.00037820797,0.000046441306,0.000017036878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013114432,0.00012940743,0.000047010457,0.0006940045,0.00006692452,0.00016898141,0.000020389252,0.00025601248,7.0924085e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003316574,0.00023579606,0.42011663,0.00035670443,0.0009004709,0.0011229577,0.2376991,0.027989471,0.004390613,0.0011077633,0.2527614,0.050002538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018252241,0.00017077928,0.26238933,0.00070726895,0.000071336,0.00008400762,0.25731817,0.00008749659,0.008216602,0.0020788317,0.46589395,0.0011569721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99891317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99990934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21313259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005043023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031830844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99877644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483767843","doi":"","title":"Psychological Consequences of Adopting a Therapeutic Lawyering Approach: Pitfalls and Protective Strategies","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Therapeutic jurisprudence; Countertransference; Neutrality; Process (computing); Psychology; Psychotherapist; Burnout; Therapeutic relationship; Jurisprudence; Engineering ethics; Law; Mental health; Clinical psychology; Political science; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.051051897712148846,"score_gpt":0.3095755052090106,"score_spread":0.25852360749686176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483767843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043571796,0.04582194,0.00021838577,0.0010052873,0.00004028734,0.0011431439,0.000009864191,0.00010059382,0.9080887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97681135,0.022474272,0.00024831507,0.00015960814,0.000030074576,0.0000014907637,6.311126e-7,0.000002967782,0.00027131644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913895,0.00025775214,0.00011248019,0.00018087955,0.00015624535,0.00015366616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967486,0.000051970877,0.00007434714,0.00007619274,0.000064974956,0.000057667337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004025165,0.00007634405,0.00024203585,0.000014348749,0.00035856708,0.000033059336,0.00015842963,0.0000583895,0.00018032994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019206818,0.00006567062,0.000049136277,0.00023248805,0.00085297873,0.00029501054,0.000017892728,0.000093943134,0.000006674909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002229115,0.00006880372,0.00011174209,0.0014116678,0.00003836044,0.000009221996,0.00250861,0.0000053415165,0.000104699015,0.96899337,0.000034489734,0.026691405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004677687,0.00029018158,0.0006880796,0.004282779,0.00019233841,0.000018270826,0.016148996,0.0000056863955,0.00006119655,0.00948219,0.96782184,0.00054068386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00812147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005771932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9677873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027913957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007022641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99848354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483904195","doi":"","title":"Using the Charter to Cure Health Care: Panacea or Placebo?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Panacea (medicine); Charter; Politics; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Health care; Public health care; Medicine; Public administration; Sociology; Alternative medicine; Health policy","score_opus":0.03267490134069296,"score_gpt":0.3521586041574903,"score_spread":0.31948370281679733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483904195","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.394666,0.13085443,0.07931312,0.22214621,0.009831169,0.006142382,0.000022553342,0.00045287516,0.15657127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99365556,0.0014842433,0.00007645403,0.0013201854,0.0010563523,0.0000052440314,2.2214891e-7,0.000015959577,0.0023857856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966438,0.00045131115,0.00023696256,0.00015281397,0.00043319992,0.0020819511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993797,0.00004963095,0.0001505905,0.000106952975,0.00012799623,0.00018513904],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003207635,0.00010964677,0.00017362245,0.00005049212,0.0019551439,0.00017706402,0.0002830034,0.00006263064,0.0000759827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019852635,0.00006694617,0.000068026646,0.00042223663,0.000061702274,0.0001889153,0.000013151583,0.0008759216,0.000027195749],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012777343,0.000049925675,0.001196806,0.000024990344,0.00013020048,0.000006398108,0.081205264,0.000091771086,0.00006582558,0.8933486,0.005501677,0.018250817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004348861,0.00031003222,0.000019929847,0.000050779945,0.000019721889,0.00011971394,0.14824167,0.000003766017,0.000023858363,0.022730192,0.82783747,0.00020796798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071664853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.094790585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87061834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016445917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012154088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486541666","doi":"","title":"The Constitution of Agreement: A Brief Look at Sub-Federal Cross-Border Cooperation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Agreement; Political science; Covenant; Law; Scope (computer science); State (computer science); Public administration","score_opus":0.0061881381555569616,"score_gpt":0.31234230124391493,"score_spread":0.30615416308835797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486541666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8471373,0.010804367,0.0031650478,0.0019913188,0.00060622254,0.00033580302,0.000003375312,0.00003009531,0.13592651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871395,0.0018694905,0.0000027613055,0.000037935362,0.0007664698,0.000003961576,0.0000024773742,0.0000045975635,0.010172766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979697,0.00013316753,0.0003316507,0.00010963321,0.0004069345,0.001048925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992688,0.000053161984,0.00023687714,0.000068129724,0.00033265474,0.000040426843],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002139384,0.00008111812,0.00012156802,0.000027688135,0.0026542703,0.0002545458,0.00014692124,0.00007183793,0.00005842282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011863986,0.00005845378,0.00006741876,0.00018519588,0.00045696774,0.00031968532,0.000019060264,0.0003812768,0.000018431698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044537865,0.000031147087,0.006647844,0.000003819007,0.00003185647,8.3818964e-7,0.00038041163,0.00009002003,0.0009976879,0.98883045,0.00032489232,0.0026164793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018909061,0.00038456146,0.0035303193,0.00006822099,0.000051026153,0.00013964613,0.0031532387,0.000051086114,0.0032418033,0.19871122,0.7883831,0.00039486797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012963562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20069751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79011923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086642854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032204152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489925341","doi":"","title":"Getting Sex \"Right\": Heteronormativity and Biologism in Trans and Intersex Marriage Litigation and Scholarship","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of gender law & policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Heteronormativity; Law; Transgender; Scholarship; Sociology; Bodily integrity; Political science; Normative; Adjudication; Gender studies; Human sexuality","score_opus":0.026883449821106402,"score_gpt":0.32428863116215334,"score_spread":0.29740518134104693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489925341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850135,0.00044837972,0.000058312395,0.002759011,0.0001207224,0.00008402281,0.0000031921536,0.0000073769243,0.011505477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99866647,0.00021674614,0.0001364391,0.00037898798,0.0005688316,9.61981e-7,2.9166915e-7,0.000005324977,0.00002596923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901617,0.00021997465,0.000302538,0.000105796295,0.00015082589,0.00020472039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994287,0.000108772234,0.00019700658,0.000045381083,0.000060935567,0.00015923996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015464895,0.00008803243,0.00019779529,0.000109161796,0.00027887683,0.0001939971,0.00008804144,0.00012362152,0.000011137342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023497982,0.00007124912,0.000027137941,0.00011162681,0.00034447561,0.0008252261,0.000026114903,0.000395075,4.2478524e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007979293,0.00011306615,0.29992318,0.00030358753,0.000096864125,0.0000519324,0.19439174,0.000002060737,0.05465176,0.40567067,0.000100259065,0.044615082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003563205,0.000478916,0.6168687,0.00043690504,0.00007937522,0.0004308697,0.020111902,0.00006990206,0.006376154,0.25955686,0.09110405,0.0009231908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069209193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008096231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31694546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033130418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000109973196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492945492","doi":"","title":"Auspicium Melioris Aevi: A Token Of A Better Age","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Library science; Law; Editorial board; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.03639924132225035,"score_gpt":0.3298574677081266,"score_spread":0.2934582263858762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492945492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.264743,0.00042518886,0.0001485995,0.0014649344,0.0004940393,0.00014229791,0.0000016430699,0.000053870324,0.7325264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925088,0.00001804463,0.00018374507,0.00043203126,0.0010438926,0.0000061878272,5.6158945e-7,0.000004839657,0.0058018547],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916327,0.000061630286,0.0001594834,0.00007086676,0.0002706387,0.00027409787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996423,0.00004674488,0.000062470535,0.0000826505,0.00005844448,0.000107348955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051436236,0.00005293123,0.00013741563,0.0000330141,0.00012992554,0.00002589094,0.00013087773,0.00006413838,0.0006893299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080575504,0.000041409083,0.00004766848,0.00021272278,0.000097079144,0.00033423104,0.000027839027,0.000047811795,0.00011399808],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019774185,0.0004314405,0.37762004,0.00025783468,0.00011182014,0.000010236555,0.12818971,6.597854e-7,0.007196456,0.36487558,0.098463774,0.022822658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013278906,0.00002793506,0.010050899,0.000029499848,0.0000183002,3.5472294e-7,0.0037371295,6.38712e-7,0.0024517486,0.0015512843,0.9818568,0.00014260432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03687584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020632253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88339305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022668411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048087575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9695377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493551315","doi":"10.21991/c9pt0f","title":"Case Comment: Canada (Attorney General) v PHS Community Services Society","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Discretion; Jurisprudence; Political science; Legal guardian; Constitutional court; Public administration; Constitution","score_opus":0.04371893510183338,"score_gpt":0.26364144151413,"score_spread":0.2199225064122966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493551315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10930686,0.0018671309,0.011717728,0.013235099,0.0071362737,0.0016930562,0.0013641582,0.00063776044,0.85304195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99041206,0.00007263736,0.00061449123,0.007877312,0.00037414525,0.000074145464,0.00010551368,0.000012711084,0.00045696454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968998,0.00033670594,0.00063778745,0.00039509754,0.00073255354,0.0009980808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979702,0.00019793778,0.00028858107,0.00042512332,0.0006008998,0.00051725213],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009010756,0.00036267453,0.00040830192,0.00007617256,0.00922015,0.00016295534,0.0006752914,0.00027027194,0.00055665337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015798544,0.00036497286,0.00023825135,0.00048945384,0.00541215,0.0010287964,0.00025487668,0.00058534206,0.00007027644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021618922,0.00016061898,0.013922751,0.00006751518,0.00011880587,0.0002542647,0.0032568013,0.00003483712,0.000017288114,0.9582093,0.023645967,0.00029023015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096765684,0.000044051758,0.00023349111,0.00016360782,0.00008663787,0.00086419866,0.052657094,0.00014413553,0.0001800278,0.013716313,0.9302342,0.00070859614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9490386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93220645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.944493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008255287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006966203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494529202","doi":"","title":"In Search of Prophylactic Rules","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legislature; Constitution; Law; Political science; Repeal; Constitutional review; Constitutionality; Constitutional right; Judicial review; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.02812784305623991,"score_gpt":0.3322232253782323,"score_spread":0.3040953823219924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1494529202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6916574,0.000087645254,0.000050741735,0.002015461,0.00006779459,0.00011408909,3.4928559e-7,0.000012778968,0.3059937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986679,0.000011020334,0.00013435999,0.000045687102,0.00008655334,0.0000023544749,7.46658e-8,0.00000189663,0.0010501535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949676,0.000030479903,0.00009534613,0.000060498944,0.0001982768,0.000118641736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998481,0.000019408419,0.000017725723,0.00003697446,0.00004829269,0.000029500541],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031618835,0.000023697337,0.00006796837,0.000038316728,0.00005782249,0.0000144235255,0.00008119795,0.00003103794,0.00013293045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007960013,0.00001905784,0.000013693372,0.00021515996,0.00009676273,0.00017078544,0.000010164608,0.000040026698,0.00005074151],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009835889,0.00011075369,0.0051024295,0.00007393054,0.0000027152516,0.0000072592943,0.021535205,0.000039709586,0.00086846174,0.9706386,0.000052119784,0.0015590142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035135893,0.0006397925,0.04857896,0.0003967157,0.000018210001,0.0000035412438,0.077711225,0.0000128120255,0.061645642,0.70743,0.09913388,0.0009156411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17210811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017480247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30701047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043985434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027135518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9754388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498795935","doi":"","title":"Torturous Consequences and the Case of Maher Arar: Can Canadian Solutions Cure the Due Process Deficiencies in U.S. Removal Proceedings","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Law and economics; Intensive care medicine; Medicine; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.01865442000027958,"score_gpt":0.2625715392883221,"score_spread":0.24391711928804252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1498795935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80170286,0.00068556675,0.0000052016067,0.03160359,0.00011090466,0.00046070886,0.000007153203,0.000022541326,0.16540149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989308,0.00004859883,0.000012573781,0.00047996713,0.00012251806,0.000020385423,2.3060586e-7,0.000004465044,0.00038045808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895763,0.00010072189,0.00021963964,0.00016774582,0.00019748978,0.00035674774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930674,0.00016817627,0.000103051156,0.00007262469,0.00023684648,0.00011253801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017439427,0.00008948296,0.00017502846,0.000059544145,0.0011646695,0.00014729734,0.00025031724,0.000074575575,0.000022730506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007518549,0.000046617002,0.00002738126,0.00050539733,0.0025252989,0.00017057767,0.000021959277,0.00012973073,0.0000011920004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008240277,0.000010096496,0.0024958511,0.00003946053,0.0000064503265,0.000040039402,0.064321496,0.0000073784904,0.000016419193,0.93158877,0.00058963377,0.0008761642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001497982,0.00015086318,0.005170842,0.00025201953,0.00010446465,0.0020550357,0.71500254,0.0011208006,0.00022994805,0.16951449,0.104122095,0.0007789026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95496935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9857277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7620743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060667895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008700799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93045694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499115456","doi":"10.21991/c9t66r","title":"SUPREME COURT OF CANADA IN BRYDGES EXANDS RIGHT TO COUNSEL","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Right to counsel; Remand (court procedure)","score_opus":0.023685569509992642,"score_gpt":0.25293871170625226,"score_spread":0.2292531421962596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499115456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05153747,0.0011269579,0.014521137,0.009014193,0.0040982612,0.0013232185,0.00045560958,0.00013503818,0.9177881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978116,0.000041578918,0.00033048075,0.0008284317,0.00014624155,0.000057468846,0.000016000018,0.000007120994,0.00076107454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971821,0.00008945776,0.0006820379,0.00039346432,0.00082856097,0.0008243807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985272,0.00013473118,0.00018599552,0.00022408538,0.00055746647,0.0003704868],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069426035,0.00023373477,0.00041569417,0.00023193007,0.001046947,0.000041187777,0.00046487304,0.00017684657,0.00069478585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000597377,0.00023145085,0.00009512258,0.0007307947,0.003120247,0.0005472538,0.000079719255,0.00018754724,0.00003740252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057406996,0.000098686316,0.044428926,0.000022713577,0.000028376217,0.0000353546,0.0010305714,0.00010124722,0.00007426599,0.9377464,0.016241044,0.00013499043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014436514,0.00011136352,0.006288665,0.00052336964,0.00004109152,0.0000463189,0.010322098,0.000042876323,0.0019409764,0.03811914,0.94026554,0.00085489266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.59842855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9036621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94627416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005315078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011007125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499637637","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.382680","title":"Cicio v. Does, 2003 U.S.App.LEXIS 2925 (2d Cir. 2/11/03) - Can We Extricate Ourselves from the Supreme Court's Quagmire of ERISA Remedies?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Golder Associates (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Lexis; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.01563317520167239,"score_gpt":0.27051862515370717,"score_spread":0.25488544995203477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499637637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63922286,0.17534591,0.0022342415,0.11809903,0.00747935,0.0022173326,0.00018920178,0.00035694323,0.05485512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96903455,0.02295209,0.00005207263,0.00022609445,0.0015193335,0.000013705255,0.000004905177,0.000037801157,0.0061594546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943568,0.00084408006,0.00071811595,0.0003720632,0.0011069173,0.0026019982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784714,0.00026412559,0.0007144841,0.00033894883,0.00058297545,0.00025232128],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004445383,0.0002961363,0.0005194993,0.00009950564,0.0014626088,0.00021173836,0.00090683356,0.0002293033,0.0003179026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012781839,0.00019160357,0.00019852616,0.0010451175,0.00048391306,0.0003823814,0.000040375387,0.0015597504,0.000027180919],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014512305,0.0004025222,0.04399862,0.000051558134,0.00094768434,0.000025103978,0.039955284,0.000028054827,0.0013209814,0.85841686,0.039072886,0.015635349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008372955,0.00016869947,0.00077838375,0.00016301817,0.0001690952,0.000035290424,0.07669842,0.0000054111492,0.00049984636,0.27140704,0.6487525,0.0004849937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055175282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32747814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60967964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009013973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009806102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501624571","doi":"","title":"\"Trapped\" in Sing Sing: Transgendered Prisoners Caught in the Gender Binarism","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Transgender; Lesbian; Sexual orientation; Gender identity; Criminology; Gender studies; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.05119094538386727,"score_gpt":0.3195292514121399,"score_spread":0.26833830602827263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501624571","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47411337,0.0005174241,0.00008280004,0.008207968,0.00010676645,0.0003601554,8.47508e-7,0.000051347288,0.5165593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99550456,0.00011036775,0.00005050963,0.00062350684,0.00016108167,0.000013025403,9.654525e-7,0.000008255956,0.0035277512],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984062,0.0002835248,0.00027734475,0.00021888809,0.0003960133,0.00041803575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968964,0.00009424985,0.000032101256,0.000109558394,0.00001963087,0.000054836335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011203012,0.00010290814,0.00015980178,0.00008123138,0.00031246393,0.00013797256,0.0002749998,0.0001315848,0.0007204609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035638754,0.00007368942,0.0000489649,0.00081578817,0.00013005486,0.0002889014,0.0000048854117,0.00020121671,0.00003948376],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007877942,0.0006013558,0.016640779,0.00008899436,0.00002903482,0.0001360076,0.8642833,0.0004870352,0.0005796011,0.05328539,0.007853116,0.055936582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012179894,0.000040360013,0.016510217,0.000083053535,0.000017018046,0.000005263477,0.15326633,0.00018856437,0.00015554304,0.014477169,0.8134325,0.0006059994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051279213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.085262135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80557936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007984139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019484537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9550384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505095038","doi":"","title":"Section 6 of the Indian Act and \"The Second Generation Cut-off Rule\"-–A Factum","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Treaty; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Genealogy; History; Politics","score_opus":0.029928511596743534,"score_gpt":0.30122784997285057,"score_spread":0.27129933837610704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1505095038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37435868,0.32661945,0.000007060054,0.0032613133,0.0017465376,0.0017969449,0.000033076805,0.0000321769,0.29214478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9252042,0.0737136,0.0000016243115,0.0005482056,0.00035263624,0.000014107335,0.0000044593917,0.000004588137,0.00015658101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989492,0.00015802319,0.00034835216,0.00012517771,0.00028357163,0.00013567407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993818,0.000028918457,0.00030648417,0.00013142594,0.00009887373,0.00005249022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079886295,0.0000925719,0.00029094613,0.000010607505,0.00066825893,0.000021966816,0.00012829014,0.00005303988,0.000032444135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031726173,0.00004576187,0.0000850758,0.00015072753,0.00078539294,0.00024071982,0.000038706174,0.00012394933,0.0000012115679],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001315411,0.000045781104,0.00062450155,0.005326899,0.000032680262,3.3298602e-7,0.007137083,8.845018e-8,0.00004682357,0.95681775,0.0009376767,0.029017217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002582338,0.000022635479,0.00052927935,0.0013291993,0.000027413267,0.000005486407,0.000119666125,0.0000014915172,0.0002642712,0.00093866227,0.9964272,0.000076495795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009214194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022661412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9954895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033083055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000084695756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99738353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509516451","doi":"","title":"Can You Patent That? A Review of Subject Matter Eligibility in Canada and the United States","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patentable subject matter; Subject matter; Subject (documents); Statute; Deference; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Law and economics; Patent law; Intellectual property; Sociology; Patentability; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.030890037414999873,"score_gpt":0.3121329932854517,"score_spread":0.28124295587045184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509516451","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026378184,0.9953307,0.0000018724621,0.0030100923,0.000102197155,0.00071806787,0.000014799244,0.0000039975034,0.0005545247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006022659,0.99308187,5.215275e-7,0.0005357777,0.000137544,0.000015726979,0.00001311078,0.000014090155,0.00017872298],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955106,0.0014385633,0.0008502224,0.00022213951,0.0005758716,0.0014026322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998487,0.00026111215,0.0008358624,0.00017385907,0.00014588257,0.000096290445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072224587,0.00024624285,0.0014281323,0.000107192274,0.00024349913,0.000056976347,0.0004644471,0.00009858875,0.000028703233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023654739,0.00014017333,0.00020965651,0.0007237226,0.00017858521,0.00006976186,0.00003162516,0.0016775136,0.0000014214128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038814465,0.000051364474,0.002350373,0.039469797,0.00041839594,0.000017772836,0.0017980475,0.0000012028536,7.891863e-9,0.020873299,0.0015393308,0.9334416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029104733,0.000039209895,0.00005545394,0.03890045,0.000321566,0.00007132071,0.0017940331,3.7030313e-7,3.2742623e-8,0.025576474,0.93270606,0.00024400147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9931248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99712396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9331976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033803962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036020692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96944416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509727831","doi":"","title":"Strickland-Lite: Padilla's Two-Tiered Duty for Noncitizens","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Immigration; Conviction; Duty; Political science; Immigration law; Right to counsel; Criminal law; Deportation; Criminal Conviction; Defense attorney; Punishment (psychology); Quarter (Canadian coin); Criminology; Sociology; History; Psychology","score_opus":0.010829125588598328,"score_gpt":0.28721920061557615,"score_spread":0.2763900750269778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509727831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77163875,0.01603417,0.02406995,0.018742058,0.0035004464,0.0033448967,0.000034274595,0.00037675176,0.1622587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987085,0.0014732883,0.00008147713,0.00018801876,0.0026206595,0.00004135945,0.0000027872288,0.000021254538,0.008486166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963338,0.00013118752,0.0003348992,0.00020206685,0.0004214356,0.0025766043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989189,0.00014064481,0.00021657631,0.000106434076,0.00040464682,0.00021277965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021287792,0.00014277623,0.00023978931,0.00007995713,0.0011520521,0.0003190268,0.0003560188,0.000113793365,0.00017210335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035016166,0.0001186284,0.00015849194,0.00029312543,0.000108193206,0.0004421581,0.000019997646,0.00073608593,0.00009849311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054644428,0.000080985505,0.0036734885,0.000019609703,0.00023696947,0.0000021356948,0.0032958882,0.000011549249,0.00044492164,0.89611465,0.006706209,0.08935893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001635328,0.00039085897,0.00089089223,0.000034900662,0.000062068306,0.000050845927,0.014503812,0.000047754427,0.00006512782,0.817106,0.16481695,0.00039548313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014434216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016027141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21544623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083838403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037529268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99212873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510251589","doi":"","title":"The Proper Remedy for a Lack of Batson Findings: The Fall-Out from Snyder v. Louisiana","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Merck Canada Inc. (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Denial; Law; Political science; Trial court; Psychology; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.0351712841029123,"score_gpt":0.312802299376727,"score_spread":0.2776310152738147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510251589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75493413,0.0021301673,0.00023468904,0.02942901,0.0050583077,0.0029421044,0.000106319785,0.00017574211,0.20498951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99057025,0.00004722385,0.00013735393,0.00075116474,0.0017233859,0.000096088705,0.000003487157,0.000020886277,0.006650183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833953,0.00013417452,0.00033822533,0.0002652251,0.00050940044,0.0004134653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985208,0.00052382326,0.00016705827,0.00038317798,0.00026764497,0.0001374858],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014906991,0.00013670253,0.00022031955,0.000014943807,0.0015288794,0.00033163166,0.00077879534,0.00017089258,0.00020464644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012720224,0.000073552685,0.00012830613,0.00017953689,0.00074676814,0.00027643974,0.00006677778,0.00035281072,0.00013315013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013487606,0.000115438066,0.010712098,0.00006852929,0.00015194104,0.0000025678883,0.021203507,0.0000026687208,0.008768683,0.87965626,0.07507498,0.0041084588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028199985,0.000042090265,0.0010573147,0.000047687896,0.000028487651,2.3237838e-7,0.0029392068,0.0000087287035,0.0016759333,0.018879753,0.9748918,0.00014677297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06481108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28339213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8998168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033575245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028123794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1511188274","doi":"","title":"Insights From Canada for American Constitutional Federalism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Federalist; Supreme court; Political science; New Federalism; Commerce Clause; Law; Politics; Cooperative federalism; Legislature; Constitution; Constitutional law; Separation of powers; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.014173878747507666,"score_gpt":0.26610350562930557,"score_spread":0.25192962688179793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1511188274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20608422,0.000105419436,0.016417691,0.010848648,0.0014329237,0.00033086972,0.000042298816,0.00009196279,0.76464593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99592906,0.0000019433141,0.0002761416,0.0019940422,0.00088259927,0.000004711689,0.000008175007,0.0000020781135,0.0009012283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942905,0.00003887698,0.00009229014,0.00011039782,0.00020608491,0.00012330952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995286,0.00019953535,0.000045565997,0.00004269522,0.000093368515,0.000090243375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000057834397,0.000044494966,0.00010188455,0.00000894499,0.0005931952,0.000063478634,0.00009286344,0.000021038273,0.00006627977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019827629,0.000036572488,0.000019592775,0.00007491635,0.00038732684,0.0000795587,0.0000073643128,0.0000250752,0.000006224344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026254615,0.0000044293097,0.0005193999,0.0000015474927,0.000006399211,2.3307555e-7,0.00050099625,0.0000023204473,0.000034465957,0.98056906,0.017291475,0.0010670336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010322242,0.000010666806,0.00096434914,0.000004580677,0.000003275485,3.6502314e-8,0.0016672162,0.00002607355,0.00008326026,0.020903265,0.9761518,0.00008225836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9973146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95966583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007916824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001080862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45624378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1511321940","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3568756","title":"Intellectual Property Colloquium Series: Canada and the Three-Step Test: A Step in Which Direction?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Series (stratigraphy); Intellectual property; Test (biology); Property (philosophy); Computer science; Mathematics; Political science; Law; Geology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.011934034369658153,"score_gpt":0.22266337525591667,"score_spread":0.21072934088625853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1511321940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7372105,0.017787764,0.0014487082,0.019981818,0.0026877278,0.0025106878,0.000009793527,0.00014934661,0.21821366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919618,0.0024817223,0.000011628202,0.00010444198,0.0003782787,0.00002018231,1.8954954e-7,0.000012377404,0.005029394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975507,0.00025716002,0.00029773737,0.0001739452,0.00038849952,0.0013319195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923784,0.00023070163,0.00013369332,0.00008801686,0.00021099435,0.000098747274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003048039,0.00012596694,0.00022375127,0.000052052746,0.0009119281,0.000109547116,0.0002931928,0.000076403325,0.00006992378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014127343,0.000069592155,0.000033499513,0.0006137882,0.00024795998,0.00030722123,0.000038436625,0.0010678365,0.0000038122112],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025682629,0.0004947866,0.20173806,0.000099834506,0.00066054956,0.00005487885,0.1978092,0.000009868791,0.00007557169,0.5043993,0.008616416,0.08347328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006556336,0.0017850567,0.0106236795,0.0003359049,0.0001738634,0.0009193404,0.2735204,0.0003720794,0.00008428527,0.22404653,0.48019275,0.0013897546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97269374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47157633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010860817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013041547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515546384","doi":"","title":"The Commerce Clause – Commonwealth Comparisons","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College international and comparative law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Commonwealth; Commerce Clause; Law; Political science; Subject (documents); Power (physics); Dormant Commerce Clause; Federalism; Politics","score_opus":0.10675605986598544,"score_gpt":0.393803836988847,"score_spread":0.28704777712286156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515546384","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039611547,0.0924206,0.00008242417,0.09381156,0.0007642306,0.00091976294,0.000049414568,0.00006605689,0.8079248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.916511,0.070462264,0.000029133624,0.006269942,0.0003042035,0.00007089929,0.00000903826,0.0000047879616,0.0063387253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843824,0.00035965972,0.0003671302,0.00018179567,0.00043002004,0.00022314495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884963,0.0004408311,0.0001891756,0.00012658631,0.00026467195,0.0001290875],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007817611,0.00012600023,0.00032805774,0.000016046613,0.0016835971,0.00014401654,0.00042636375,0.00005300796,0.00013445286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005175103,0.000085886415,0.0000686492,0.00023758019,0.000498503,0.00022369766,0.00007563983,0.00022396629,0.00007069588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018641846,0.00003945684,0.0007893174,0.000033620276,0.000031986827,0.0000032206365,0.0003687699,3.5159292e-7,8.0093434e-7,0.9101205,0.08766957,0.0009237896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016124271,0.000028585544,0.00064615085,0.0005279827,0.000016116757,0.000009406669,0.0010885703,0.000030708008,0.0000018665459,0.0021349168,0.9952412,0.00011324035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009169144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041962218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91254985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074782336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000107632266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516652919","doi":"","title":"Allocating Damages Caused by Violation of the Charter: The Relevance of American Constitutional Remedies Jurisprudence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Damages; Jurisdiction; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Cause of action; Legislature; Constitution","score_opus":0.008418104755562386,"score_gpt":0.2788427618669082,"score_spread":0.27042465711134583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516652919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95247036,0.009326886,0.005168112,0.02487817,0.00038802752,0.00036083075,0.0000072508915,0.000026104122,0.007374282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996563,0.002838431,0.000010979365,0.000110121466,0.00024090112,0.0000014018821,3.5959272e-7,0.0000023539499,0.00023244263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983997,0.0001924265,0.00028129685,0.00008523212,0.0004868431,0.00055454083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989962,0.0001364474,0.0005335118,0.000093279166,0.00021375988,0.000026777465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018115229,0.00006567995,0.00013974277,0.000020717072,0.00067299407,0.000026875336,0.0003637235,0.00002894128,0.00000429012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005388997,0.000038837443,0.000060943385,0.00032662856,0.0010932257,0.0001895067,0.000012320296,0.0004902664,7.436343e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023540228,0.000055824075,0.010242728,0.000008791901,0.000064311294,2.366975e-7,0.00613103,0.000054615022,0.017415721,0.93637544,0.00056173216,0.029066049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016090893,0.001729546,0.07076376,0.0011018878,0.00025302952,0.000077975004,0.10120582,0.00021289346,0.01765121,0.72272843,0.08178317,0.0008831698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018635293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004401526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21364696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019397015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020021803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51761943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518121802","doi":"","title":"\"Am I My Brother's Keeper?\"1: Reforming Criminal Hazing Laws Based on Assumption of Care","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Emory law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Merck Canada Inc. (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Statute; Political science; Liability; Duty; Enforcement; Law; Criminal law; Criminal liability; Brother; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.019549803617831468,"score_gpt":0.2976546569109547,"score_spread":0.27810485329312323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518121802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32545492,0.0005114891,0.0016606944,0.0010105283,0.0017454906,0.00020828375,0.0000045378406,0.00007085293,0.6693332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99734557,0.000013337137,0.00024063344,0.00033987383,0.0018849856,0.000002340658,9.793935e-7,0.000014817144,0.00015743733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983485,0.00029234463,0.00031515682,0.00013791268,0.000622737,0.00028338493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991191,0.000110388624,0.00027539243,0.00011295511,0.00023743641,0.00014473507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012376843,0.00010501175,0.000216955,0.000069270216,0.0012340917,0.00012544788,0.00022353797,0.00010409324,0.00018660047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020949193,0.0000878764,0.00011657725,0.00011531812,0.00016325632,0.00033669156,0.000013418345,0.00027484752,0.0000227737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008743669,0.0005251252,0.015474866,0.0015892605,0.00014304742,0.000102000384,0.16567804,0.00360891,0.00883078,0.44433075,0.0022070038,0.35663587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003750073,0.002107642,0.005082162,0.003954613,0.00025062417,0.000065699256,0.099156044,0.0010529208,0.016981047,0.010163567,0.85606796,0.0013676294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008531272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011751567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.853861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016621691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001381757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518167023","doi":"","title":"Mr. Justice Marshall Rothstein, Supreme Court of Canada, Address to the American Bar Association, Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Association (psychology); Section (typography); Political science; Administrative law; Economic Justice; Bar (unit); Psychology; Business; Advertising; Geography","score_opus":0.06840600996292688,"score_gpt":0.35529124152952096,"score_spread":0.28688523156659407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518167023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017359028,0.019583115,0.000041319337,0.023072997,0.0006809275,0.003082722,0.00031057696,0.000044866534,0.93582445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918753,0.002614947,0.00017718952,0.004441535,0.00021605233,0.00006389538,0.000003499485,0.000012167833,0.00059539534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704206,0.000999155,0.000627668,0.0002849226,0.0007600613,0.0002861064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962197,0.00080979516,0.0013335393,0.00023803375,0.0012020487,0.00019690947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021732566,0.00017559312,0.0006033797,0.000013614669,0.00047741854,0.0000327932,0.00028310478,0.00006617718,0.00010373581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019663146,0.00013809395,0.000066925146,0.00042277947,0.00054675475,0.0003600977,0.000040153463,0.00017982496,0.000003081992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099007215,0.00012894951,0.00050852104,0.001209757,0.00020350578,0.000009469401,0.008483245,3.0829904e-7,0.0000591095,0.97410274,0.014935222,0.00026018568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001355779,0.0006599817,0.0037892186,0.0013523025,0.00052083784,0.000006616022,0.011185021,3.6366902e-7,0.0012480818,0.00047304027,0.98036385,0.0002651233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6762417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8983734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9745163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020112668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016899464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5631308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1525652459","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2571466","title":"Case Comment: Alberta v United Food and Commercial Workers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Agricultural economics; Environmental science; Economics","score_opus":0.014404261232963116,"score_gpt":0.2663090512859727,"score_spread":0.2519047900530096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1525652459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92237586,0.0016488498,0.0017151923,0.027508581,0.0005682599,0.0002540601,0.0000021424692,0.000052252013,0.04587482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967877,0.0005271712,0.00000906672,0.00080064783,0.0009078602,0.0000027106503,0.0000013616728,0.000013180636,0.00095027866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758476,0.00035156106,0.00021272596,0.00013428037,0.00024268529,0.0014739892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993006,0.00021126072,0.0001359741,0.00007954029,0.00008879127,0.00018382289],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023780589,0.00011160696,0.0001691424,0.00009838447,0.0014563256,0.0001798284,0.00017824933,0.0000970755,0.000026190852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026720206,0.00009931099,0.000050973078,0.00032667804,0.00016240921,0.00022904325,0.000030720013,0.00089326134,0.000011275566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035122826,0.00004794925,0.008826438,0.000008203709,0.00011154456,0.000015463402,0.0058704973,0.0000032423568,0.00000320811,0.9527165,0.0013230747,0.031038735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014061658,0.00080299197,0.00024187681,0.00006022605,0.000083651765,0.001990141,0.034016374,0.000046845267,0.000007627666,0.20151025,0.75942165,0.00041218306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054880694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31993097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7580986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032012071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082212937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1525741930","doi":"","title":"In re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust Litigation: Examining the Requisite Levels of Inquiry into the Merits of a Case at the Class Certification Stage","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Class action; Class (philosophy); Political science; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Civil procedure; Summary judgment; Federal court; Law and economics; Economics; State (computer science); Computer science","score_opus":0.055958612772368785,"score_gpt":0.319606232146535,"score_spread":0.2636476193741662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1525741930","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9730495,0.0040543387,0.000077324185,0.020578079,0.00014620628,0.00025728912,0.0000035002204,0.000005061584,0.0018287081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968915,0.00060853845,0.00000814185,0.00026168046,0.0005361065,0.000003148341,6.76714e-7,0.0000064415635,0.001683776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979926,0.0003357253,0.00042883196,0.00012548105,0.0003804075,0.0007369644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990473,0.00013760907,0.00038346864,0.00018423141,0.00015873759,0.00008867401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041285087,0.00008704425,0.00014997044,0.00007364087,0.0009600588,0.00007268003,0.00038080278,0.000078033336,0.000051321953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029457442,0.000049373506,0.000051079624,0.0005110526,0.0002601369,0.00032761446,0.000017215514,0.0005860029,0.0000021011163],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011619781,0.000059879072,0.012886241,0.000034326647,0.00014745629,0.000086026754,0.42755708,0.00009559127,0.012171405,0.45590144,0.0013796424,0.0895647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011907613,0.0009764862,0.084537685,0.00039845845,0.00014213339,0.0006176098,0.56793237,0.00010537325,0.00488493,0.26608163,0.0725276,0.00060500257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40387148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8799126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47604114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081386435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005303023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9407335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526362886","doi":"10.1177/009885881303900211","title":"The Role of Private Law in the Control of Risks Associated with Tobacco Smoking: The Canadian Experience","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Law & Medicine","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Legislation; Tobacco control; Government (linguistics); Class action; Business; Control (management); Political science; Law; Action (physics); Public administration; Public health; Medicine; State (computer science); Economics; Supreme court; Management","score_opus":0.01915490647097126,"score_gpt":0.299904142200474,"score_spread":0.2807492357295027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526362886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93305176,0.0014253644,0.000009357027,0.021166643,0.00012687307,0.00032868062,0.0000023454666,0.000003210601,0.043885756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982023,0.00006449284,0.0000028910783,0.0014950113,0.00020984309,0.000009001263,1.485269e-7,0.0000056809345,0.000010625982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977829,0.0005362554,0.0004973001,0.00006999889,0.0008026408,0.0003109048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99729526,0.00093467016,0.0010315971,0.00015127288,0.0004613167,0.0001258789],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027656185,0.00008648404,0.00036628346,0.000032509663,0.0005665063,0.000042901396,0.00070575764,0.00003135662,0.000030051498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006876226,0.000033539018,0.00004421131,0.00052304164,0.0038487383,0.00016446385,0.0000086131495,0.00026991457,4.256798e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012645769,0.00009434088,0.2296939,0.0000061856226,0.00028047123,0.00002383167,0.25645265,0.00004974293,0.00046184676,0.48873842,0.0003794625,0.02369267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002525449,0.0029170304,0.16195439,0.0011543836,0.00022866041,0.00003252061,0.55803454,0.000033895765,0.00030184613,0.011973355,0.26052475,0.00031917548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93355376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79669803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47676507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009011588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037329603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527157723","doi":"10.4225/75/57b289de40cd1","title":"Zubulake: The Catalyst for Change in eDiscovery","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Journal of Paramedicine","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Electronic data; Political science; Business; Electronic records; Law; Law and economics; Public relations; Economics; Civil procedure; Computer science","score_opus":0.04582346099285282,"score_gpt":0.3685235288390369,"score_spread":0.32270006784618405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1527157723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6227631,0.005168872,0.0006988372,0.34499523,0.0036983886,0.0016898272,0.000011929096,0.000030057581,0.020943752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943149,0.00013744387,0.000049683007,0.00090704556,0.0042331154,0.0000053546664,9.970183e-7,0.0000045684455,0.0003468534],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987514,0.000070050075,0.00042672944,0.00008283176,0.00037934052,0.00028963602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921286,0.00013967826,0.0003041298,0.000083070656,0.00013326065,0.00012700557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014695401,0.00008488955,0.00026596122,0.00009643902,0.00016531811,0.000045045766,0.00029337042,0.000073573305,0.000030838724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046114347,0.00005126257,0.000085463915,0.00033595317,0.00018048182,0.00036700245,0.000004712166,0.00022589993,0.0000032815476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010966348,0.0011237522,0.10542534,0.00027896187,0.000284739,0.00095580105,0.28713298,0.00012376247,0.0013155064,0.14353158,0.14539163,0.31333932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0052549564,0.0033616335,0.23229522,0.0018449626,0.0002490541,0.00021289587,0.044888314,0.00002984688,0.00035584855,0.03205005,0.6789119,0.0005453187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001672266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017425014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5335203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000645876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020434667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25279772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542606338","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511617706","title":"Reconceiving the Family","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Child custody; Political science; Child support; Law; Work (physics); Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.025665456090244378,"score_gpt":0.22578862886568066,"score_spread":0.2001231727754363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542606338","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006823115,0.00056458614,0.000069698304,0.00008469576,0.0006592466,0.00047080062,0.00007602104,0.00016778665,0.9978389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025099795,0.000085447035,0.0000068621903,0.00013573944,0.0014983757,0.0000011810704,0.000015008093,0.000026047235,0.99572134],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998378,0.00022305653,0.0001787441,0.0003581755,0.0004696051,0.00039245968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988724,0.00020672874,0.00027066795,0.00032173374,0.00021167225,0.00011680425],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004176452,0.00022592215,0.00031312407,0.00006924292,0.001406597,0.00017939052,0.00091057963,0.00039934568,0.0000028577513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040448067,0.00020768857,0.00018973024,0.000029811697,0.00070537964,0.0001427621,0.00017962568,0.0004707217,0.000023265686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055186933,0.0000027947701,0.0000024667854,0.000027040527,0.000024274674,0.000033093533,0.00037546718,6.929167e-7,0.0000020892826,0.425303,0.57361406,0.0006094729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012362815,0.00001103029,0.000026690186,0.00014851867,0.00008470579,8.3109325e-7,0.000557594,0.0000020662387,0.0000049659207,0.000031195163,0.9987413,0.00026742075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05193851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007487386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42527184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051791366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001189222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1543897645","doi":"","title":"Deterring Player Holdouts: Who Should Do It, How to Do It, and Why It Has to be Done","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marquette sports law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advertising; Business","score_opus":0.07947803496910595,"score_gpt":0.3301894109656125,"score_spread":0.25071137599650656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1543897645","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012405329,0.06349116,0.00022117155,0.66422737,0.0008525195,0.0032911939,0.000037663467,0.00019999241,0.2552736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6843929,0.052936662,0.00027346236,0.2539139,0.0013689362,0.00019352706,0.000009346436,0.00006269241,0.006848569],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996916,0.00014177286,0.0006010247,0.00069334114,0.0009232565,0.0007246054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984724,0.000076014396,0.0002177056,0.00044615573,0.00018440757,0.00060333696],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020098188,0.0003425992,0.00085827924,0.00007656942,0.00073418184,0.0007839447,0.00041095217,0.00016664728,0.0008519045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029101846,0.00029427127,0.0001510903,0.0007953789,0.00018231088,0.00060585927,0.00017695529,0.00023400228,0.00006136237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037092996,0.00008572696,0.006862331,0.0027275889,0.00006449963,0.00051881425,0.008745876,0.000004456754,0.000045792018,0.02028636,0.9101943,0.050427154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011500541,0.000046664863,0.0002713907,0.0053885174,0.0000710547,0.00002171642,0.00041286004,3.0119813e-7,0.000012309206,0.00017747354,0.9930562,0.00042654725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017249314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037515324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6719876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011021331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013973468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544132179","doi":"","title":"Reconsidering Res Judicata: A Comparative Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Res judicata; Scope (computer science); Doctrine; Law; Adversary; Political science; Action (physics); Law and economics; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.25700860748035,"score_gpt":0.3939149846991725,"score_spread":0.13690637721882254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544132179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.087434866,0.00072611426,0.00044003993,0.0011592264,0.0011834458,0.00013412756,0.000010222741,0.000019947922,0.90889204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971203,0.00006346333,0.00086813554,0.00022211886,0.00096945796,0.0000051223465,9.642333e-7,0.0000066331286,0.000743796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810976,0.00026614947,0.0005767279,0.0001663172,0.0006697603,0.00021128838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967309,0.000240178,0.0007434255,0.00008099315,0.002044062,0.00016041085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007542265,0.0001423962,0.0004301477,0.00015286323,0.00037589087,0.000121000594,0.0005201025,0.000062767394,0.00063706114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013533511,0.00012305187,0.00016344748,0.00019488385,0.00059348834,0.0010561311,0.000049860162,0.00030963746,0.000067004155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015957496,0.00011295559,0.0005525336,0.0000021062185,0.00023311186,0.00002284219,0.115311645,0.00001019461,0.00014285608,0.881342,0.0020805683,0.000029610734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075601065,0.00030764076,0.0019520317,0.00022293681,0.00005144505,0.000060173898,0.10289224,0.00002353521,0.005838765,0.09310542,0.7944976,0.00029216864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003624707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006595315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90968543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030432318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032668424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69753724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546684010","doi":"","title":"How Robust is the Governance System of British Columbia for Regulating the Environmental Aspects of Shale Gas Development","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bradford Scholars (University of Bradford)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hydraulic fracturing; Legislation; Legislature; Transparency (behavior); Enforcement; Regulator; Corporate governance; Public participation; Environmental planning; Business; Sustainability; Shale gas; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Natural resource economics; Public administration; Political science; Oil shale; Environmental science; Engineering; Waste management; Law; Petroleum engineering; Finance; Economics","score_opus":0.012309182300582281,"score_gpt":0.18147243680116165,"score_spread":0.16916325450057937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546684010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872315,0.00033449437,0.0016783598,0.0011668334,0.00016382866,0.00072997523,0.00012589125,0.000026195843,0.008542932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947601,0.000046935766,0.0012046235,0.00003653364,0.00008172272,0.0000018185136,0.0000042349902,0.00001230152,0.0038517606],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841917,0.00015345824,0.0002470273,0.00024954905,0.00064439303,0.00028641353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863815,0.00022206709,0.0006986207,0.00025386002,0.00011495679,0.00007231933],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001247415,0.000095686846,0.00032928263,0.000021286714,0.0013049282,0.00013927859,0.0007804912,0.00011317288,0.000040279385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015026977,0.00011282743,0.00016453053,0.00026865664,0.0005960219,0.0006250294,0.00013809597,0.00013826955,0.0000014166252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044642203,0.0009346929,0.20298809,0.00507091,0.0013666787,0.000021273216,0.12788193,0.0003056371,0.0058489176,0.20234442,0.040081434,0.4127096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034714467,0.00044159638,0.36408037,0.002082966,0.00028405534,0.000025685385,0.19052818,0.0014153678,0.001673089,0.0035558075,0.4315031,0.0009383574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039027132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07862225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41177124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014783333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018537175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1548195955","doi":"","title":"Before You Host a Party Read This: Social Host Liability and the Decision in Childs v. Desormeaux","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Harm; Government (linguistics); Autonomy; Assertion; Duty; Political science; Law and economics; Duty of care; Law; Duty to protect; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.006028609463067668,"score_gpt":0.2610048106190587,"score_spread":0.25497620115599107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1548195955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9616225,0.0058587072,0.00023112382,0.011404286,0.00027933682,0.0004062516,0.0000036742294,0.000035629495,0.020158514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958236,0.0011539945,0.000012081218,0.00011116705,0.0017037155,0.00001067633,9.92343e-7,0.000012429781,0.001171313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967496,0.0004074513,0.00043461725,0.00023349875,0.0005508347,0.00162404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999338,0.00014530824,0.00022051166,0.00010060645,0.00012772548,0.00006784821],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072624283,0.00014849166,0.0002897366,0.0000695747,0.0016952403,0.00024139276,0.0003257907,0.00017334061,0.000039413473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047839177,0.00009603018,0.00011610008,0.00044221972,0.00055770885,0.00038211158,0.000047876023,0.001345938,0.000010300233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003403004,0.00014890237,0.055299997,0.000010394146,0.0000403035,0.0000045364313,0.017653303,0.0000020266395,0.00001822783,0.8975009,0.0005817496,0.028399406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021279329,0.00015876112,0.06353857,0.000058206893,0.000034696557,0.000043261072,0.009562615,0.000014369065,0.0000051372444,0.8923434,0.031893726,0.00021931123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0462232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3540056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30778238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082371914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020969799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W154997875","doi":"","title":"The Rules of Professional Conduct: A Conflicting Guide for Counsel in Child Custody and Access Proceedings","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Child custody; Professional conduct; Right to counsel; Psychology; Law; Legal ethics; Political science; Criminology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.13674393191880455,"score_gpt":0.4107299191758901,"score_spread":0.27398598725708556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W154997875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99347425,0.0005340253,0.000014593161,0.00077354966,0.000352975,0.00067845674,0.000016401396,0.00003920902,0.004116564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965797,0.00015341076,0.000011469221,0.0000994825,0.00026856118,0.0000064213014,0.0000026928694,0.000015895865,0.0028623852],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984438,0.00012151475,0.00029349804,0.00024795713,0.0003765044,0.0005167141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987509,0.0003167598,0.00031821808,0.000100380596,0.00033145037,0.00018226958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018403967,0.0001556532,0.0002573342,0.00016370496,0.0010891486,0.0003000693,0.00060965464,0.00016883982,0.0000049945347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003315239,0.00013130417,0.00005663509,0.00032224038,0.00036477364,0.0029395532,0.0001882368,0.0002837319,0.0000038512117],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073336276,0.00006170496,0.97908205,0.00011587608,0.000021227603,0.0000019790639,0.008890698,2.6101603e-7,0.00017246159,0.011191699,0.000005156204,0.00038353654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009777672,0.000050069473,0.87164664,0.00052568427,0.000045561395,0.0000072705375,0.013629833,1.8060891e-7,0.00064164825,0.000519848,0.111665174,0.00029032386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002832702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005632971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11166002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011263436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018278984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8376961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1550600082","doi":"","title":"The Case Against Same-Sex Marriage in Canada: Law and Policy Considerations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Meaning (existential); Law; Sociology; Foundation (evidence); Political science; Gender studies; Psychology","score_opus":0.01853885757025264,"score_gpt":0.23443851488100978,"score_spread":0.21589965731075714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1550600082","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37316582,0.0005107551,0.000034494115,0.013412979,0.0004612935,0.00015677206,0.000014645056,0.000009843086,0.6122334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99820524,0.00016617404,0.000026562659,0.00059654744,0.00015602325,8.05411e-8,1.953981e-7,0.00000348142,0.00084568595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987421,0.00047292872,0.00019961892,0.00008413782,0.0002415531,0.00025968527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896616,0.00029424223,0.00018669268,0.00007065878,0.00026408493,0.00021816806],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009916875,0.00006699109,0.0001478282,0.000067970774,0.0016803368,0.00026593136,0.00013292814,0.000048141792,0.000023453344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004353282,0.00005501525,0.0000344479,0.00029326664,0.0003917786,0.00065453595,0.000023013872,0.00018083566,5.643977e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024000806,0.000010982848,0.0016751759,0.0000026648186,0.000019100595,0.0017556063,0.0017123354,0.0000040460886,0.000004566368,0.9935751,0.0010838815,0.00015416113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007934693,0.00002353408,0.0006435452,0.000026829573,0.000017804454,0.0010176526,0.062325526,0.0000059068475,0.000015782362,0.01785729,0.91711,0.00016262944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.986153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9757178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008720346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048596445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552046944","doi":"","title":"Affording Discretion to Immigration Judges: A Comparison of Removal Proceedings in the United States and Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College international and comparative law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Discretion; Law; Political science; Commit; Immigration law; Convention; Waiver; Duty","score_opus":0.04280318097654043,"score_gpt":0.35181468779765557,"score_spread":0.3090115068211151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552046944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93395543,0.0065531265,0.00004587136,0.035831388,0.00008121527,0.00087837595,0.000030670795,0.000009254025,0.022614678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953581,0.002066523,0.000040245468,0.0023600485,0.000044793556,0.000019513029,0.000015504034,0.000001310423,0.00009393317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908346,0.00007257531,0.000288167,0.00012527978,0.00033692134,0.000093612536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950844,0.00008250222,0.00013531288,0.000027953682,0.00020387568,0.000041902444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043628382,0.00007674972,0.0002358949,0.00003928892,0.00018710151,0.000049582322,0.00013124754,0.000025183954,0.000009559432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040253693,0.00005397384,0.000016543294,0.00031908145,0.00006662359,0.00017094956,0.000011864743,0.0000816554,3.694989e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039391452,0.0000522945,0.0024044486,0.00014469514,0.000012724936,0.0000021067801,0.011391634,0.000009727174,0.00003075959,0.9783582,0.0065720403,0.0009819418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023045613,0.00016045429,0.0048261085,0.0020519744,0.000021915683,0.0000067739047,0.028488072,0.00060867635,0.00008077352,0.00277129,0.9605824,0.00017111904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78652227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97558695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007306481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007609854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44477215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552363372","doi":"","title":"Developments in Family Law: The 2003-2004 Term","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Law; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Term (time); Rhetorical question; Child support; Human settlement; Political science; Engineering; History","score_opus":0.011691896295613152,"score_gpt":0.2738257111976265,"score_spread":0.2621338149020134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552363372","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63167715,0.021331068,0.0010506886,0.008315666,0.0016869508,0.0007049179,0.0000017878601,0.000090558846,0.3351412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99535745,0.002153705,0.000021387517,0.00052253914,0.0005041347,0.0000069320454,4.1067446e-7,0.000010100853,0.0014233087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728364,0.00011301087,0.0002582168,0.0001287325,0.0004307575,0.0017856689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996037,0.000019734238,0.00010990047,0.000072351075,0.00012136608,0.00007292963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025513691,0.000097781114,0.0001291205,0.00005144644,0.000918634,0.0001482517,0.00041344808,0.00007887093,0.000007703852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000113015005,0.00006818248,0.000038880076,0.00055810803,0.00014331435,0.00031959754,0.000021991094,0.0010478777,0.00005702252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010106828,0.000039025857,0.0023902054,0.0000021029691,0.000025135218,0.0000066874895,0.0049584056,0.00002255966,0.000051580428,0.9863434,0.000061503044,0.006089274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013596478,0.00012064492,0.008210802,0.00011621333,0.000015172894,0.00006653833,0.024634095,3.5586282e-7,0.00006249465,0.78766507,0.17742679,0.00032218065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030974884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21094482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36368033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018807373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0094814645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99613386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553727096","doi":"","title":"Hydro Law and the Future of Hydroelectric Power Generation in the United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vanderbilt law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hydroelectricity; Renewable energy; Natural resource economics; Greenhouse gas; Environmental protection; Business; Environmental science; Economics; Engineering; Ecology","score_opus":0.023770949653074303,"score_gpt":0.2989259806843814,"score_spread":0.2751550310313071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553727096","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037568938,0.85155314,0.000019049434,0.018813856,0.00029777884,0.0014498763,0.0000030538342,0.000023715154,0.09027061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8984105,0.09264351,0.0000040539594,0.008519376,0.00035412682,0.000027072207,0.0000067499845,0.000004375569,0.00003023897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984632,0.0007360073,0.00025058317,0.00008753327,0.0002624771,0.0002001566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994669,0.00017772341,0.00012275389,0.00013509038,0.000060264196,0.000037290618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002656259,0.00007888883,0.00022891487,0.000018727285,0.0003274455,0.000046269633,0.00017102601,0.00004858106,0.000036162113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006615407,0.000037334372,0.000046047244,0.0006457535,0.00027196112,0.00021133131,0.000015558378,0.00011049651,0.000004734222],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003070355,0.000024451983,0.000108041815,0.0001906338,0.000007190727,2.3578154e-7,0.0050175567,0.0000011728997,0.000005234049,0.99244356,0.0015938698,0.00060497306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018519297,0.000016212523,0.000027232227,0.0001875332,0.000033125565,0.0000017186319,0.00059597,0.000014234797,0.000012672373,0.0032223803,0.9956394,0.00006435697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023059325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011097498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9940455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016319802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027588283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9834462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555251283","doi":"","title":"Case Comment: In re Dewey Ranch Hockey","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Franchise; League; Phoenix; Insolvency; Asset (computer security); Political science; Law; Business; Advertising; History; Marketing; Computer security; Metropolitan area; Archaeology","score_opus":0.012786369947064596,"score_gpt":0.2921498761164307,"score_spread":0.27936350616936606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555251283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9556244,0.0014376579,0.00019442475,0.009035616,0.000929804,0.00020073689,0.0000014190313,0.00003877203,0.032537144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996761,0.0008700043,0.000016217917,0.000308148,0.0011631422,0.0000049849095,4.7675576e-7,0.000011861062,0.00086416304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973178,0.00016550171,0.00026519896,0.00014118946,0.00030383375,0.0018064869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947405,0.000070237875,0.00012766832,0.00009871738,0.00009646361,0.00013284518],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037881522,0.00009785981,0.00016494934,0.00009432894,0.0007686549,0.00013771046,0.00026444183,0.00013275864,0.00012282857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027042933,0.000087582834,0.000063992265,0.00033330746,0.00010108072,0.00032828285,0.000021673432,0.0023904159,0.000035819532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056325513,0.00016920624,0.017988523,0.000013386636,0.00005929135,0.00061863963,0.01938127,0.0000051775046,0.00035324108,0.92135364,0.0014254986,0.03857582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020766002,0.00025557986,0.0003257182,0.000060797545,0.000033265158,0.004372838,0.07391572,0.000021765003,0.000104615014,0.50373656,0.4145529,0.00054363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034053843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6117328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.577679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004629077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026823822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556090743","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511611490.004","title":"The Watergate Effect: Or, Why Is the Ethics Bar Constantly Rising?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Geography; Meteorology","score_opus":0.03792707005990208,"score_gpt":0.25454010726362825,"score_spread":0.21661303720372616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556090743","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010727718,0.0010253383,0.00003945925,0.0018276394,0.00081571424,0.0008304915,0.000116531315,0.00013882793,0.9950987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00945101,0.003958427,0.0000029172782,0.0009058711,0.0005653343,0.0000015768342,0.000004588471,0.000040850024,0.98506945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997376,0.00049161224,0.00025973085,0.0004595837,0.0008880215,0.00052500475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997029,0.001461023,0.00034900216,0.0005356327,0.00042923982,0.00019609382],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011313685,0.00037776862,0.00043680856,0.000056456844,0.006067704,0.0002977529,0.00125243,0.0007859309,0.000014775208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017998906,0.00022805994,0.00027450503,0.000025854513,0.002914205,0.00013359112,0.0003309524,0.0013895434,0.000048210328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015845198,0.000003657663,0.000004128324,0.00007474199,0.00017420476,0.00023060963,0.0074994247,3.3193064e-7,0.000002732147,0.7005615,0.2904587,0.00083148526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002761215,0.00006396582,0.0000019323454,0.00023882228,0.00013425325,0.000010252878,0.0007502862,0.0000025631443,0.000104535924,0.000055371434,0.99801993,0.0003419534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022642363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017380673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70756125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024156453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087203854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1558207436","doi":"","title":"The Evolution of a New Pleading Standard: Ashcroft v. Iqbal","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Merck Canada Inc. (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Pleading; Supreme court; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Civil procedure; Law; Lawsuit; Scrutiny; Summary judgment; Political science; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Economics","score_opus":0.015279418772501722,"score_gpt":0.3099208083664389,"score_spread":0.2946413895939372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1558207436","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04242254,0.002078072,0.0075999913,0.010086156,0.00047028868,0.00025442571,0.0000020211899,0.00010279635,0.9369837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887958,0.000036709116,0.00008149752,0.00005748344,0.00038933312,5.205631e-7,1.0356922e-7,0.0000017236252,0.010636807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992579,0.000042627595,0.00014102506,0.00007358766,0.00030991,0.0001749252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996601,0.000059274094,0.00006490598,0.000065036234,0.00008842666,0.00006228197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056137715,0.000039082188,0.00008391399,0.000016593096,0.00053054653,0.00006823741,0.00014532542,0.000041690942,0.00006269429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025783014,0.000025075238,0.000035595465,0.00024122941,0.00008160635,0.0001563347,0.000007706122,0.000044064065,0.00001234935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022932685,0.000008135544,0.0011814651,0.0000027630797,0.0000055102987,3.2865574e-7,0.005522599,0.0000028163179,0.00028136617,0.9361293,0.02263867,0.034204144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026133133,0.00016545226,0.0044791284,0.000042173957,0.000010445638,4.3052194e-7,0.019323062,0.000013671878,0.00055078225,0.12993719,0.84509206,0.00012425051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041025817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01349687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9463733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013260891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051895657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96536005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564720906","doi":"10.1353/esc.2003.0027","title":"Making a Bad Law Worse","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English studies in Canada","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Capilano University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Parliament; Pornography; Criminal code; Government (linguistics); Economic Justice; Convict; Sociology; Criminal law; Political science; Criminology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06546488233032925,"score_gpt":0.3465956979901178,"score_spread":0.28113081565978854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564720906","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06912311,0.0058717323,0.0000017066677,0.00031902213,0.004366869,0.00016491326,0.0000033760828,0.00003414563,0.9201151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982075,0.00012990799,0.0000323131,0.00064325717,0.00043427027,0.000020094938,1.4255514e-7,0.00000634842,0.0005261288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988263,0.00014248604,0.000181833,0.00015965111,0.0003417732,0.00034792264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943066,0.0002150145,0.00005093785,0.00008556697,0.00016436995,0.000053438896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005173719,0.00008227041,0.00019022902,0.000020869655,0.00046700475,0.000029404315,0.00013024408,0.00002989488,0.000057462705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019287159,0.0000790073,0.000018666331,0.0003496962,0.00017111102,0.00012911354,0.000026925298,0.00011712019,0.0000017022793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005155783,0.000021578806,0.032092568,0.000075906275,0.00007072211,0.000230974,0.10934419,0.0000687755,8.1830717e-7,0.79012686,0.06687643,0.0010860274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010146874,0.000004085786,0.0001487733,0.00007091334,0.00000357036,2.6568222e-7,0.10997219,3.8012263e-7,0.0000080921045,0.0018465767,0.88772875,0.00011495178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9919073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9290844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001034076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001456115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.359187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564827554","doi":"","title":"Court of Appeals of New York: Hurrell-Harring v. State","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Touro law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; State (computer science); Political science; Right to counsel; Supreme court","score_opus":0.11903171212421901,"score_gpt":0.3335821471066135,"score_spread":0.21455043498239448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564827554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026203168,0.2130652,0.000061617175,0.00046539,0.0002628716,0.00059166166,0.000007965927,0.000044375778,0.7828806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9548829,0.042319555,0.00019785718,0.00045985813,0.00018302408,0.0000060377643,7.5845975e-7,0.000013017188,0.0019369856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877334,0.000119478056,0.0004698089,0.00012834773,0.00030327972,0.0002057343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919724,0.000036394467,0.00035974444,0.00016775102,0.00011890793,0.00011993542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009614601,0.00008506884,0.0004488313,0.000015835098,0.0000919782,0.00000891549,0.0002762741,0.000036573816,0.00075420085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001254024,0.000071234026,0.000103456754,0.00025603618,0.00015363883,0.00013259723,0.00003266701,0.00006450513,0.000054278647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018511784,0.00013935825,0.0009729672,0.011281235,0.000091525646,0.000008398006,0.016685465,6.272341e-7,0.00021725835,0.8607073,0.03817456,0.0717028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093707255,0.000042215,0.00010797661,0.0046991203,0.00005466511,5.891066e-7,0.0002761682,1.8852381e-7,0.0006364201,0.004436488,0.9895352,0.000117260315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09881724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003333696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9522626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002005293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018723302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9071838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1567662657","doi":"","title":"Special Recognition: St. John's University School of Law Honors Alumni Who Have Served as Chief Judge of the United States Court of International Trade","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.019819839416979172,"score_gpt":0.2524379773725229,"score_spread":0.2326181379555437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1567662657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.638499,0.000075536984,0.000010450265,0.0018695764,0.000866714,0.00039079227,0.00034679356,0.000027636763,0.3579135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969515,0.00017827896,0.00007483533,0.00033743045,0.0007405155,0.0000018750745,0.00003675834,0.0000121654775,0.0016666495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980285,0.000437413,0.0004058798,0.00022118859,0.0006725862,0.00023440809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874747,0.00012952322,0.00044519763,0.00019808339,0.00031219993,0.00016750778],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065892603,0.0001381209,0.0003181864,0.00008157863,0.0003654003,0.000047550984,0.00052094145,0.00014830062,0.0016471565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036742445,0.00012485939,0.00015836945,0.0005214978,0.0007141931,0.00045216447,0.000057045854,0.00024195587,0.000018750046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040362138,0.0006867145,0.043757197,0.0002420707,0.00047493115,0.000019550967,0.011840155,0.0002286523,0.0005939071,0.9052544,0.036158286,0.00034046918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001124413,0.00011257384,0.007926653,0.0002659438,0.00006599199,0.0000017407699,0.008547924,0.000010478606,0.005925367,0.009423318,0.96636236,0.00023324648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10686825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05174616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93020403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013122056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004027402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1571195437","doi":"10.1002/9781444323405.ch2","title":"Legal Requirements for Producers Selling Canned Fish into North America","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fish <Actinopterygii>; Business; Fishery; Commerce; Biology","score_opus":0.022101703580191128,"score_gpt":0.3099311853725766,"score_spread":0.28782948179238543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1571195437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000093190116,0.00014616214,0.0005438052,0.0015866216,0.0021365904,0.0012572175,0.000046331374,0.00033222194,0.99385786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010671263,0.00014333375,0.0012298563,0.0006992281,0.0053674784,0.00012545002,0.00006617053,0.00023118716,0.98146605],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836075,0.00004442184,0.00024607414,0.0004584662,0.00044289324,0.00044740736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916965,0.00003269311,0.00029055058,0.00021090414,0.00013627582,0.00015994682],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002643842,0.00021432713,0.00035185405,0.000110114685,0.00046048017,0.00018035182,0.00040052275,0.00030813913,0.0015766888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022810725,0.0001908452,0.000097074786,0.00028666557,0.00022244072,0.00014878917,0.00003131561,0.00019707422,0.00007320285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000087043245,0.000028821582,0.0001413687,0.00015758174,0.00005885006,0.0000021521369,0.00254863,5.5026226e-7,0.000014053328,0.0016278065,0.9858037,0.009607768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012008604,0.0000371888,0.0000048134816,0.00006891719,0.000026405682,7.1915935e-8,0.00077509764,0.0000021789342,0.000020735544,0.00011187332,0.9985599,0.00027272722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42240745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7337864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.311379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008995413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006392277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572505345","doi":"","title":"Mr. Garland Goes to Ottawa: Comments on Restitution in Canada through the Lens of Garland v. Consumers' Gas","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Loyola of Los Angeles law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Lens (geology); Political science; Law; Physics; Optics","score_opus":0.03335572446463545,"score_gpt":0.3034290228093618,"score_spread":0.2700732983447263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572505345","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1480505,0.21838169,0.000025627567,0.011329536,0.00076259073,0.0031518235,0.0002540512,0.00002556145,0.6180186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851932,0.012182534,0.000028039376,0.0024614183,0.000038175378,0.000019888328,0.000004168933,0.0000065396175,0.000066039625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998355,0.0003881384,0.00044967423,0.00015955116,0.00041571414,0.00023195508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992172,0.00019498866,0.00022179916,0.00019341843,0.000116175484,0.00005642664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007268569,0.00011282329,0.00042598168,0.000015055258,0.00017476009,0.000014997254,0.00021431196,0.00004178163,0.00006370547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037096426,0.00007514492,0.000053086744,0.00034104293,0.00019245545,0.00011599606,0.000017124714,0.00009954337,0.0000036046686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021377673,0.00014060107,0.03257565,0.0033582393,0.000055051485,0.000012842934,0.0013358117,0.000015373247,0.00007939366,0.9137709,0.046686377,0.0019483789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001492497,0.000039984705,0.00095051434,0.003693004,0.000030050784,7.9967435e-7,0.000319746,1.9153843e-7,0.00017062161,0.00055518566,0.99398965,0.00010100164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9569157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9903797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9473033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015400503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005828696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3064321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576082661","doi":"","title":"Deference to the Majority: Why Isn't the Supreme Court Applying the Reasoning of Atkins v. Virginia to Juveniles","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Loyola of Los Angeles law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.031230243542506884,"score_gpt":0.3086106831929167,"score_spread":0.2773804396504098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576082661","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03793263,0.4808814,0.0013549678,0.05152636,0.0012530886,0.013251047,0.000268935,0.00015374261,0.41337782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831193,0.009009254,0.00023126081,0.00680564,0.00028040798,0.00029565155,0.0000013946116,0.000019179499,0.00023792095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975595,0.0006761398,0.00050702714,0.00023902286,0.0006738941,0.00034444945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984139,0.00040696515,0.00029533956,0.0004946247,0.000285143,0.000104010425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031905754,0.00016462163,0.00048213365,0.000018681745,0.000772191,0.00008790315,0.000921869,0.00006030487,0.00012481157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010080971,0.000080669255,0.00016396545,0.0008099555,0.000314913,0.00012753034,0.00010230073,0.00018224529,0.00002393666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074850227,0.000046138557,0.0013850523,0.0011867643,0.000048495993,0.000001544515,0.0033468585,0.000010036457,0.00015818719,0.9459134,0.03736676,0.0105293095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040577237,0.000035419656,0.00024533347,0.0027256636,0.00007930098,0.000001988098,0.0010912551,9.536599e-7,0.00017051765,0.00082735723,0.99466354,0.00011808109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022165684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044060204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9572968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000378829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001607529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9843458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W157926775","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1062","title":"New Brunswick (Minister of Health and Community Services) v. G.(J.): En Route to More Equitable Access to the Legal System","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.03671431630726523,"score_gpt":0.37204518587448204,"score_spread":0.3353308695672168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W157926775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82338166,0.0005930912,0.000049326103,0.111667804,0.00021407784,0.00038568195,0.00001699451,0.000016610196,0.063674726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98602796,0.00006799069,0.000037250815,0.010346674,0.002507472,0.0000010063437,4.6084924e-7,0.000009135193,0.0010020776],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796724,0.0007033745,0.0005124086,0.00007987759,0.00040090142,0.00033617142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990063,0.00009618783,0.00031440274,0.00009198978,0.00014591348,0.00034524014],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022532584,0.000104582265,0.0004281961,0.00006291779,0.0018665054,0.00037686393,0.0004990788,0.00008761551,0.0000135635055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003633724,0.000075232296,0.00006680803,0.00029392962,0.000114246,0.0005392814,0.00012464111,0.00028343833,0.0000030783708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001924242,0.000081013946,0.001798451,0.0006496289,0.00009033595,0.000004289158,0.603256,0.0000131367815,0.000016005839,0.35376006,0.006020055,0.03411864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005670943,0.0004420617,0.010218568,0.0003714877,0.00003288176,0.000021414342,0.07450605,0.0000017740643,0.000013005315,0.0011632198,0.91248757,0.00017490266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7145765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10807963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9064675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014167794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016354158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579884250","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2012.01441.x","title":"SAME SEX, DIFFERENT RIGHTS: AMENDING U.S. IMMIGRATION LAW TO RECOGNIZE SAME‐SEX PARTNERS OF REFUGEES AND ASYLEES","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Refugee; Persecution; Legislation; Immigration law; Political science; Law; Immigration reform; Population; Refugee law; Sociology; Politics; Demography","score_opus":0.03907273651068179,"score_gpt":0.35761914716710147,"score_spread":0.3185464106564197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579884250","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42364007,0.47440672,0.00022894096,0.007794132,0.0015466951,0.0027221886,0.000054264274,0.00020638041,0.089400604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9562988,0.04024248,0.00012431723,0.0018003219,0.0005246517,0.000059102542,0.000008348483,0.000012757264,0.0009291901],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981366,0.00029948325,0.0004878173,0.00023638557,0.0004564395,0.0003832873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906707,0.00016927582,0.00023776722,0.00016415562,0.00011026687,0.00025147066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013157373,0.00017702175,0.00060100993,0.00004400524,0.00035424015,0.000069070426,0.00016935854,0.000093818904,0.000067787456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017746128,0.00013115216,0.00008766627,0.00026989987,0.00014773845,0.00039939448,0.000049804738,0.00011139277,0.000039463972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007302632,0.00086929905,0.052177906,0.015325177,0.0005314328,0.000008976213,0.077412814,0.000002024884,0.0046442463,0.32166344,0.16986264,0.357429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095102005,0.0000614604,0.0020855889,0.0033489966,0.000090621405,8.100242e-7,0.001326293,8.2248613e-7,0.00029412966,0.0010325961,0.99142313,0.00024045438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013572968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044564107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8215605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008708701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004642867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99299574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580971803","doi":"","title":"Teck Cominco and the Wisdom of Deferring to the Court First Seised, All Things Being Equal","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.014420732576537667,"score_gpt":0.258138203470031,"score_spread":0.24371747089349335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1580971803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90632313,0.008405293,0.0052020736,0.056291394,0.00045021335,0.00066799374,0.0000017663274,0.00004570118,0.022612423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99493587,0.0031473676,0.000018381621,0.00061521993,0.0006520808,0.000005527827,1.4332566e-7,0.000010735586,0.0006146836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977956,0.00019846654,0.0002879856,0.0001245332,0.0004929408,0.0011004701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991906,0.0003041037,0.00019541258,0.00010186152,0.000119145414,0.00008883313],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046846336,0.00010211386,0.00021289583,0.00004102686,0.0020338777,0.00009003655,0.00045397435,0.00006066591,0.000008792283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003709335,0.000057277535,0.0000827935,0.00021847103,0.0004231798,0.0002582659,0.00006781044,0.0008695437,0.0000071020986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021866888,0.000036009336,0.0050176494,0.000016561724,0.00021315411,0.000006214074,0.12650599,0.00012921434,0.000056319364,0.86340016,0.0010261306,0.0033739132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038164435,0.00054409064,0.0013585617,0.00026260165,0.00019714984,0.00071366504,0.100740716,0.00026337855,0.000135829,0.47413138,0.41725388,0.0005823058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0154448515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029477695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41622776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002623904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012128344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584604341","doi":"","title":"A 'Reasoned Apprehension' of Overbreadth: An Alternative Approach to the Problems Presented by S.163.1 of the Criminal Code","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Possession (linguistics); Child pornography; Pornography; Political science; Law; Criminology; Criminalization; Criminal code; Psychology; Criminal law; The Internet; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021126682576148505,"score_gpt":0.2894608271191765,"score_spread":0.26833414454302795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1584604341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93827534,0.008193459,0.011219395,0.01053128,0.00048434545,0.0019094396,0.000045053315,0.000048984166,0.029292699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99822986,0.0005116503,0.000033125114,0.00018172461,0.000360322,0.000007256685,0.0000013720669,0.000009517748,0.00066516304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971991,0.0004542369,0.00036241784,0.00018921461,0.00074048253,0.0010545496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891156,0.000059992344,0.0004051228,0.00020728473,0.00030749355,0.00010854723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021426203,0.00012896916,0.00024043489,0.000044735694,0.0005781243,0.00006126791,0.00088901113,0.00007263599,0.0000050161357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002181234,0.000071928844,0.00012105498,0.00047464145,0.00018784784,0.00024984227,0.00004086314,0.0007250332,0.0000014317513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053024053,0.0019085412,0.0016758111,0.000084110136,0.00044638224,8.219994e-7,0.09749934,0.0017190587,0.014699033,0.8452418,0.0068472256,0.029347619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00403707,0.005438728,0.007246273,0.0008768475,0.00064079254,0.00028156757,0.20668979,0.0020249893,0.007907724,0.61695045,0.14657536,0.0013303921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010899613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00706133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22829135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024402307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014835835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586771993","doi":"10.21991/c9cq10","title":"TERMINAL CARE, TERMINAL JUSTICE: THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA AND SUE RODRIGUEZ","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Terminal (telecommunication); Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Remand (court procedure); Engineering; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.02368763410841072,"score_gpt":0.2618966319644512,"score_spread":0.23820899785604047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586771993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108425416,0.0056617423,0.009531481,0.0073266006,0.0070098415,0.0018162905,0.00081755116,0.00017830716,0.8592328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99838483,0.00007378112,0.00022175223,0.00048373375,0.0003058694,0.000038915663,0.00001728473,0.000006859479,0.00046694072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756455,0.000107116364,0.00053864036,0.000359511,0.0007400952,0.00069008983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843407,0.000182138,0.00025825275,0.00024305901,0.0006115838,0.0002708773],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004761633,0.00024406117,0.00032757493,0.00008872805,0.0030026243,0.00007321767,0.00045219195,0.00015972074,0.00021872844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050791196,0.00019359769,0.0000974239,0.00029837986,0.008757151,0.0005183765,0.00012916198,0.00023859013,0.000010360963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046929377,0.000038603506,0.022390088,0.000082565566,0.00004065694,0.000050321574,0.0018866074,0.000016779633,0.000028317292,0.97032964,0.0044887047,0.0006007895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020754403,0.00023097197,0.014090633,0.00071192015,0.0006157339,0.0007881768,0.11611062,0.00012536153,0.0010480937,0.030398741,0.83244115,0.0013631337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53824747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72445226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9399309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026774462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009279228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586780762","doi":"10.20381/ruor-11103","title":"The \"Faint Hope Clause\" (C.C.C. s.745.6): The judicial review process with special reference to the 1996 amendments.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"uO Research (University of Ottawa)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Political science; Linguistics; Law; Computer science; Philosophy; Programming language","score_opus":0.06519627041496201,"score_gpt":0.38183711503215545,"score_spread":0.31664084461719344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586780762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008827818,0.0028287182,0.000010288217,0.034888625,0.0004693903,0.0034006098,0.000049196122,0.00004309289,0.94948226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61871004,0.08222184,0.000037573565,0.0007816309,0.0058830967,0.00007966366,0.00021046214,0.00009502897,0.29198065],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994057,0.0010968809,0.00029169492,0.0005131568,0.0032127188,0.0008285718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99647593,0.0005450562,0.00040119016,0.0005723134,0.0017714245,0.00023407086],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005278983,0.00023904469,0.0004490238,0.00015794774,0.0064866804,0.00025169365,0.003100639,0.00022729565,0.0006075284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008391139,0.00013725199,0.00012987012,0.00223987,0.0011631034,0.00029316967,0.00016185046,0.0012091952,0.00020576199],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047541954,0.00028027044,0.0012570505,0.0020614862,0.00045249445,0.00012560755,0.0640336,0.000011927948,0.000019734438,0.28436303,0.56231064,0.08460877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017031548,0.00019135087,0.0014061062,0.001312154,0.0000681505,9.785477e-7,0.069216065,9.849346e-7,0.00000761085,0.0014842588,0.92595446,0.00018757323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026820827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.515659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65750164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030595632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018893782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99480677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588414815","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1021","title":"Section 15(1) at the Supreme Court 2001-2002: Caution and Conflict in Defining “The Most Difficult Right”","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Section (typography); Jurisprudence; Political science; High Court; Sociology","score_opus":0.036268995179990327,"score_gpt":0.2895490815012053,"score_spread":0.25328008632121496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588414815","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022486987,0.70502496,0.00002511652,0.048085324,0.0013808302,0.0027682101,0.000045009205,0.00018572605,0.21999785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82832724,0.16065101,0.000010780861,0.0038040064,0.0006775914,0.00012723893,0.000015742684,0.000026260626,0.00636011],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749297,0.00056711404,0.00050826033,0.0003487257,0.0005918916,0.00049106905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989047,0.00024306314,0.00022163274,0.00028721092,0.00022341439,0.00011996326],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020987578,0.00020897061,0.00040369743,0.000025804367,0.0015593256,0.00017293259,0.0003088917,0.00013981052,0.0017045563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038544319,0.00012441089,0.00008290593,0.00067303324,0.0004974962,0.00033289404,0.00008078366,0.00030238964,0.00024776655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025259626,0.0002268374,0.005276476,0.0020999915,0.0001160589,0.000034388977,0.011915339,0.000028389315,0.00022208967,0.22442771,0.74248767,0.013139769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019129939,0.00002585981,0.0006636224,0.0012306942,0.00006550778,0.000015924074,0.0002526463,0.000079333695,0.00001407896,0.000121296325,0.99714917,0.00019055865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026424909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11108782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80584025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021878269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000068463814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1589311579","doi":"","title":"A Review of the Year in Family Law: \"Same-Sex\" Marriage Issue Dominates Headlines","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"University of Oklahoma College of Law - Digital Commons (University of Oklahoma)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Legislature; State (computer science); Same sex; Political science; Constitutional law; Power (physics); Constitutional right; Constitutional court; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.03476449023720474,"score_gpt":0.2773891674839094,"score_spread":0.24262467724670467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1589311579","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000589249,0.70810026,0.000004536441,0.0007768311,0.00016064948,0.0013143542,0.0026296885,0.000033756914,0.2863907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03977021,0.9542563,0.00014917836,0.000039659517,0.00007732434,2.8769992e-7,0.000046063185,0.000031320185,0.0056296554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969838,0.0004918528,0.0007486906,0.0004906689,0.00085253746,0.00043242754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962646,0.00057249184,0.0016999085,0.00074469513,0.0005355553,0.00018277897],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007475586,0.00043334538,0.002925659,0.00033124257,0.0005434806,0.00002372181,0.002401489,0.0004856218,0.0002539752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014811441,0.00046211688,0.0012624484,0.0014883061,0.0030650508,0.00089948607,0.0008497131,0.00042515396,0.000020662312],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000560732,0.0027982758,0.00054927485,0.17914765,0.0014763284,0.00040463722,0.015191912,0.000007070837,0.0000065780096,0.5534032,0.03726584,0.20918852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006989445,0.0001318467,0.000043545206,0.042678412,0.00048386914,0.000005420409,0.010722312,0.0000012229731,0.0000015069638,0.00041128986,0.9444421,0.00037952847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04771982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054379098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90717626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032096857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010874794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1589896724","doi":"10.25071/1916-9272.34372","title":"A Case for Personal Meetings with the Federal Ethics Commissioner","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Public Policy Administration and Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Public relations; Public administration","score_opus":0.15228820699522647,"score_gpt":0.3732721237450636,"score_spread":0.2209839167498371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1589896724","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35398626,0.00033635527,0.0017287191,0.50052065,0.00016724646,0.00043387586,0.000012683128,0.000022913295,0.14279133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959961,0.000024581146,0.000057382535,0.0025213363,0.0007108466,0.0000026399744,2.2489009e-7,0.0000043425807,0.000682519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990254,0.0003421073,0.00017385607,0.000041776086,0.00026346644,0.00015341725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988748,0.0003586411,0.0002668118,0.000038688537,0.00032252705,0.00013854873],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003631438,0.000057575406,0.000090002344,0.000024299823,0.0019062825,0.00022205232,0.00013142198,0.00006284543,0.000030633608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045534899,0.000026029367,0.000034294408,0.00011719934,0.0005306282,0.00029988654,0.000010304218,0.00022663361,3.9461744e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013980301,0.000046850513,0.000086604574,0.000017274418,0.00003603393,0.000026409241,0.15393128,5.2872483e-8,0.000020061714,0.8421579,0.0024021943,0.0011355627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075443555,0.0009778787,0.00025747827,0.000048259993,0.00006871443,0.0031674418,0.08656778,0.000029553505,0.0001353516,0.011666305,0.8961669,0.00015986124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013086857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025809314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89376473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002039848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011330664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594843427","doi":"","title":"Immortal beloved and beleaguered: towards the integration of the law on assisted death and the scientific pursuit of life extension.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Assisted suicide; Context (archaeology); Autonomy; Law; Political science; Position (finance); Psychology; History","score_opus":0.04968530628510512,"score_gpt":0.26718454399845115,"score_spread":0.21749923771334603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1594843427","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97545457,0.0003824699,0.0000031141724,0.006994084,0.0007704469,0.00076024065,0.000007628917,0.000009935306,0.015617486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999006,0.000015012856,0.000004963767,0.0002093084,0.00014389178,0.00008878369,6.074507e-7,0.0000042811694,0.00052720035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987718,0.00018507123,0.00021201867,0.00015445087,0.0005115853,0.00016507674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912184,0.00021939675,0.00020187083,0.00021029421,0.00018584119,0.00006075508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027494002,0.00006889742,0.00015603156,0.000021419402,0.0008110093,0.00020372629,0.00030634657,0.00006743476,0.000006041176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015409321,0.000028762182,0.000049770664,0.0002596264,0.0019445679,0.000120478115,0.00007753444,0.00013669877,3.197198e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018134138,0.00010763889,0.006763942,0.000042083168,0.00006706594,4.012788e-7,0.01771636,0.0000014969999,0.0035018637,0.8279105,0.0008875111,0.14281984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000618013,0.00001763515,0.9766097,0.000025383348,0.000055588676,0.0000013997862,0.0034997182,0.000047245816,0.0020333012,0.0066412813,0.010358529,0.00009222394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019119391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028108109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9698457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009199611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000095923104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9896264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595478172","doi":"","title":"Disentangling Disparate Impact and Disparate Treatment: Adapting the Canadian Approach","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disparate impact; Disparate treatment; Statutory law; Context (archaeology); Employment discrimination; Political science; Federal court; Court decision; Law and economics; Statutory interpretation; Disparate system; Law; Actuarial science; Business; Economics; Labour law; Civil rights; Supreme court; History","score_opus":0.02323000181431923,"score_gpt":0.3011056711042784,"score_spread":0.27787566928995916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595478172","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42571378,0.0012483046,0.00006184217,0.0013741391,0.00008413334,0.0003562219,0.000012369891,0.000053284657,0.57109594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950536,0.000043668664,0.000033357075,0.00005590018,0.0005529258,0.000017806562,0.000005149347,0.000008478451,0.004229108],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990142,0.00009004153,0.00013532034,0.00017698373,0.00016560836,0.00041787105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995857,0.000060185022,0.000054667027,0.000073651325,0.00003476116,0.00019102193],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030853142,0.00011417511,0.00013227257,0.000034435656,0.0019446795,0.00045876316,0.00010654309,0.0000558711,0.000041226016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023279465,0.00006250499,0.000048683258,0.00023533503,0.00017714695,0.00021308949,0.000011051647,0.0000541368,0.000014533045],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029627563,0.00013530655,0.6348425,0.000027617414,0.00012223593,0.000025923488,0.022095675,0.001245218,0.000070466645,0.3280856,0.004093477,0.009226335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022009483,0.00035771425,0.3593778,0.00012519791,0.00030392906,0.000025370498,0.04431851,0.019872325,0.00021730478,0.022413442,0.5486465,0.0021409288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9791673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98146075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5693398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002690521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003483776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599508463","doi":"","title":"SEEKING JUSTICE IN THE EMPIRE STATE: COURT OF APPEALS BROADENS THE REACH OF LONG ARM JURISDICTION AND CLARIFIES THE STATUTORY GUIDELINES FOR APPLICATION OF CPLR SECTION 302(A)(1)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"American Bar Foundation","keywords":"Law; Plaintiff; Statute; Jurisdiction; Statutory law; Political science; Personal jurisdiction; Original jurisdiction; Supreme court; Common law; State (computer science); Sociology","score_opus":0.03178343934061472,"score_gpt":0.3303585305879274,"score_spread":0.2985750912473127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599508463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9442501,0.003385657,0.026010057,0.009906565,0.0008584908,0.0026860193,0.00005799735,0.000061623585,0.0127834575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986249,0.00021536235,0.00008491711,0.00027700095,0.00060042774,0.00006798883,0.000004839856,0.00000881263,0.00011575282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983571,0.00038054434,0.0005168202,0.00016894568,0.00040666226,0.0001698889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981558,0.00057673216,0.00048229712,0.00023014919,0.0005257884,0.000029233708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004101593,0.00009178293,0.0002088641,0.000033987493,0.0004971798,0.00005586869,0.0002721895,0.00010288943,0.0000026896603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000666046,0.000053087933,0.00005164088,0.00028062434,0.00038825214,0.00021445789,0.000027308826,0.00017798838,5.981987e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062003086,0.0005900507,0.0692761,0.0036894053,0.00025790997,9.787093e-7,0.16663447,0.0035816366,0.022238735,0.6476309,0.019937277,0.065542534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019247015,0.0007037613,0.08041365,0.00087050966,0.0006200585,0.0000084971025,0.11509024,0.005269539,0.005473772,0.055304173,0.73368657,0.0006345166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041386366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03739331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7137493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031943764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000104977946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98017174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1601795522","doi":"10.58948/0738-6206.1067","title":"2007 Judges' Edition Bench Memorandum: Nineteenth Annual Pace National Environmental Law Moot Court Competition","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pace Environmental Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Memorandum; Pace; Law; Competition (biology); Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.012279588474115968,"score_gpt":0.2740705536509881,"score_spread":0.2617909651768721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1601795522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017942978,0.13279001,0.0008227178,0.011194805,0.002683143,0.0045319754,0.0019043478,0.0003293055,0.8278007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97185844,0.020521142,0.00013662214,0.004170555,0.0016199639,0.000048207723,0.000511922,0.000033573207,0.0010995966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965587,0.0002513511,0.00056138466,0.00048557957,0.0015681692,0.00057477044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990263,0.00014139159,0.00030875902,0.00019157711,0.000020084413,0.0003118702],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020410186,0.00029852882,0.00043048098,0.00003456389,0.0009852428,0.00006703697,0.00025284337,0.00017500325,0.004487974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040718056,0.0002962278,0.00017538901,0.00014603049,0.00083321985,0.00078417466,0.00008563988,0.00026464986,0.0010506007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011853346,0.002175717,0.009351695,0.001586468,0.00023534335,0.00010025095,0.0037937765,0.000037215934,0.0019878608,0.8413703,0.13211054,0.007132322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039521066,0.00008625459,0.0023717417,0.00044156495,0.00007100454,0.000012491263,0.001069526,0.0000027745264,0.0001996397,0.0007219326,0.9942357,0.00039215112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002237754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019362103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9539154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077434204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004303064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1601954506","doi":"","title":"Penal Policy and Penal Legislation in Recent American Experience","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Imprisonment; Legislature; Nothing; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Law; Period (music); Criminology; History; Sociology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.024384431658852526,"score_gpt":0.35997671957770305,"score_spread":0.33559228791885054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1601954506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5954572,0.00013028468,0.000104391394,0.011944879,0.000047143243,0.00011830177,4.4734233e-7,0.000033777207,0.39216357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99686915,0.00031481398,0.0001881791,0.00047424436,0.00072238897,0.000008023619,3.4210717e-7,0.0000027807941,0.0014200548],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992805,0.000054781813,0.00012938294,0.0001303676,0.00020747325,0.00019748298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975365,0.000035614474,0.000048903912,0.00004158716,0.00004060067,0.000079653946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002353827,0.000047911537,0.000086720975,0.000063242835,0.00017770799,0.000078299585,0.000075193966,0.000023681438,0.00018328926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020439351,0.000041770927,0.000009716093,0.00043212483,0.00022168287,0.00037777523,0.000018542645,0.00004842368,0.000017132497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030406496,0.00009184754,0.0635216,0.0000064618876,0.000004234355,0.0000033783751,0.14148378,0.000050471688,0.00038666304,0.22169654,0.0010049122,0.5717197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001974985,0.000039560065,0.02353321,0.000014197755,0.0000012645918,0.0000012994942,0.01721226,0.00015573154,0.00013969615,0.000950712,0.95759654,0.0001580558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19383332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09168822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9565916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010428473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018799565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9248861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605094561","doi":"10.21991/c9x68f","title":"Cooperative Federalism in Search of a Normative Justification: Considering the Principle of Federal Loyalty","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Loyalty; Normative; Political science; Federal law; Law; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Legislation; Politics","score_opus":0.03309826142050176,"score_gpt":0.3159430235126354,"score_spread":0.28284476209213366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1605094561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40158665,0.0015129269,0.15216,0.027976943,0.002711106,0.0035141169,0.0003715137,0.00018428959,0.40998244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989593,0.0000368414,0.00030982474,0.00031406383,0.00012872981,0.00005874303,0.000020045527,0.0000052471282,0.00016721056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738485,0.00037171278,0.00079679734,0.0002934748,0.0006623683,0.0004907817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977965,0.00056202366,0.00031619568,0.00022985222,0.00097470445,0.000120739875],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014740545,0.00018863121,0.00041209656,0.00016107764,0.0017720545,0.0001008263,0.0003737702,0.00015340623,0.00010542354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015564224,0.00015217815,0.000119661134,0.00062576623,0.0089133335,0.0006322287,0.00012346108,0.00027234745,0.00002442024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040484134,0.000081635735,0.022151627,0.000054065225,0.000032230142,0.000001632717,0.002198815,0.0030225299,0.0002373732,0.971685,0.00025314125,0.00024145826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008782323,0.0005547586,0.018662661,0.0029143644,0.0001647264,0.0001552752,0.10067571,0.009671791,0.017435022,0.12489007,0.7137905,0.002302847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043673324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062557296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84679496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019167327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026898065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1607939490","doi":"","title":"Clouding Accountability: Canada’s Government Secrecy and National Security Law 'Complex'","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Accountability; National security; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.014654575758585635,"score_gpt":0.27433378704746203,"score_spread":0.2596792112888764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1607939490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6732476,0.0027516768,0.0005135464,0.01586872,0.00072678184,0.00033488628,0.000024615414,0.00005103037,0.30648118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978957,0.00046209517,0.000012777543,0.0005176823,0.00089790963,0.0000024769765,9.365351e-7,0.000007746107,0.00020266642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99698496,0.0000800682,0.0002162899,0.00016215247,0.0013603321,0.001196186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995018,0.00004516958,0.00012286614,0.000046245113,0.00015065992,0.00013320969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024576725,0.00009864194,0.00014009982,0.000012880767,0.0011723064,0.00015064255,0.00017497505,0.000057906873,0.000040527855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013259357,0.0000926202,0.00003658417,0.0001173922,0.00012352515,0.00032411236,0.00003134825,0.00067468395,0.0000018051543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010241225,0.000020177959,0.0007889266,0.000004568868,0.00003219451,0.0000013021898,0.001215741,0.000012566409,0.000034434383,0.9973395,0.000107934975,0.0004324201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000355953,0.00004284011,0.00031586774,0.000014998243,0.000009995048,0.000043915716,0.013548463,0.0000036331342,0.000021850119,0.8845015,0.10100656,0.00013438905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8251985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9937016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32464814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007633473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016465206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99617606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W161306848","doi":"","title":"Are You on the List? Dispelling the Myth of a Total Exemption from the Privacy Act’s Civil Remedies in Shearson v. DHS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Cincinnati law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Mythology; Civil rights; Political science; Business; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.03431844826589081,"score_gpt":0.2524853338504464,"score_spread":0.2181668855845556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W161306848","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7121354,0.04228306,0.00003416422,0.16666444,0.00030273915,0.0025923036,0.000030295574,0.00004036704,0.07591727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840175,0.014197019,0.000009143002,0.001352009,0.000090126465,9.721786e-7,0.0000014283531,0.0000039031765,0.0003278855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870217,0.00042198077,0.00019442789,0.00013456972,0.00040583278,0.00014100932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986666,0.00050388626,0.0003926214,0.00023937626,0.00016741306,0.000030099127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009998748,0.0000844435,0.0002660816,0.000014633765,0.00041619636,0.000027378504,0.00047423912,0.00004856847,0.00040186304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045963365,0.000045280525,0.000098080476,0.00030004975,0.00039721243,0.00022825925,0.000079728496,0.00016076952,0.000024357007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009210228,0.0005719858,0.014767774,0.00331746,0.000284636,0.000022101973,0.1965273,0.000050663788,0.00037037657,0.5988585,0.14314449,0.041992627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028832097,0.000057569432,0.026864547,0.010697637,0.00011501597,5.094745e-7,0.024317851,0.000039028484,0.000064132255,0.0042655994,0.9330818,0.0002080076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14406103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044313256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7899373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006152324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006520319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9731255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1623523886","doi":"","title":"Spilling Secrets: Trade Secret Disclosure and Takings in Offshore Drilling Regulation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Greenfield Research (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Supreme court; Constitution; Eminent domain; Business; Law; Public interest; Trade secret; Government (linguistics); Intellectual property; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.020293980634642796,"score_gpt":0.2559140950623895,"score_spread":0.2356201144277467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1623523886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9799614,0.0048473068,0.0020035196,0.0010498629,0.00026706632,0.0002333508,8.789813e-7,0.000040204486,0.011596397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99639016,0.0026949453,0.00005608609,0.000034889646,0.000644365,0.0000040363325,0.0000011240585,0.000015252287,0.00015910882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773824,0.00014301685,0.00030829315,0.00018632108,0.00031286696,0.001311284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995596,0.00004192048,0.00019743256,0.00006064494,0.00004073694,0.00009969359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026326857,0.000115099276,0.00018826938,0.000110790505,0.00051965937,0.00009822757,0.00016348985,0.00013057761,0.00003831524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013953261,0.00010279941,0.000050460418,0.0003029969,0.000109606764,0.0005460487,0.000015032596,0.0009098065,0.0000021334656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007368782,0.00005025385,0.16881244,0.000028747158,0.00006134151,0.000010659064,0.061996214,0.000017952345,0.00029015797,0.7393513,0.000021755906,0.029285505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087117444,0.00028707902,0.046398815,0.00032455433,0.000050903098,0.00015188995,0.052655544,0.00020115143,0.00014148478,0.88393867,0.014462123,0.0005165962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005750823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04701409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1445874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043532078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009501802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9703754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1636711477","doi":"","title":"The Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters: C.L. Dellums and the Fight for Fair Treatment and Civil Rights by Robert L. Allen (review)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour / Le Travail","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil rights; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.01537093033048888,"score_gpt":0.25979221123217655,"score_spread":0.24442128090168766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1636711477","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10152938,0.8095134,0.00045401193,0.033042412,0.00056101644,0.005458161,0.00013388408,0.00010420957,0.04920351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710713,0.021628328,0.000026353764,0.00050549605,0.00020757932,0.00018176006,0.0000029662444,0.000012609751,0.0063636173],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896777,0.00018939786,0.00024379895,0.00017680146,0.00019320748,0.00022904352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992569,0.00023347596,0.0001476213,0.00013404344,0.00012068338,0.00010728209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009575831,0.00011655601,0.0002838186,0.000009544914,0.00056999695,0.000060897688,0.00016793585,0.000075242,0.000009762214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008594704,0.00005877032,0.00005648268,0.00007424205,0.0003808453,0.000120405966,0.00001665594,0.000056328958,0.0000017726799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000624893,0.0005582754,0.0024848974,0.001405132,0.0012396411,0.000007904679,0.22881146,0.00000846697,0.00041166425,0.25437027,0.23368809,0.2763893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001488194,0.00012073987,0.000110074616,0.00014151231,0.00005476173,0.0000014513415,0.0026827494,0.000014736039,0.00013760924,0.0047110687,0.99042463,0.00011249168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055031702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051170595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8695419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031105752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001390099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9661431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W168019101","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1110","title":"In the Park: A Jurisprudential Primer","year":2010,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Primer (cosmetics); Law; Political science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.012381302423647869,"score_gpt":0.3160161615382893,"score_spread":0.30363485911464144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W168019101","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06947953,0.0008329428,0.00002025097,0.014018363,0.005405228,0.0003051306,0.000008458506,0.0000187723,0.90991133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894623,0.0005867036,0.00006539751,0.0010708723,0.008420676,0.000008704064,6.317385e-7,0.000020747664,0.00036392175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671566,0.0005475335,0.00057832216,0.00025889586,0.0011375892,0.00076196674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988021,0.00017853783,0.0003821468,0.00024569227,0.0001679082,0.00022361062],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036291452,0.00022087367,0.00031560165,0.00006745776,0.00206139,0.0016869091,0.0010886986,0.0003120592,0.0007807544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016153794,0.00014901803,0.00020831561,0.00040110704,0.00050326536,0.00088254677,0.00008111394,0.0018238461,0.00026960578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033253393,0.00026222266,0.0022351653,0.000028362772,0.000032741515,0.00015282271,0.008889839,0.00000167047,0.00064874196,0.98254704,0.003322608,0.0018455336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095380103,0.0001370558,0.004314243,0.0001754052,0.00009110683,0.00031599897,0.0037919658,0.000009126399,0.000247055,0.08009693,0.9094638,0.00040346765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23249716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5043016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9199828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043136297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003066871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W168443748","doi":"","title":"Defending against Suits Brought by Illegal Aliens","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Wrongful death; Law; Plaintiff; Tort; Misrepresentation; Jury; Doctrine; Lawsuit; Immigration; Political science; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.014371805943596144,"score_gpt":0.2864605411120291,"score_spread":0.27208873516843296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W168443748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56067955,0.00799041,0.0017302517,0.00781649,0.0030932545,0.00036200875,0.000045738965,0.00028476035,0.4179975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907551,0.0020141418,0.00009249319,0.0023766365,0.0021238357,0.0000018656989,0.0000051688107,0.000017879387,0.002612924],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972769,0.00024364187,0.00045552588,0.0002484474,0.0010106297,0.00076482404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986466,0.00011194908,0.0002860519,0.0001307589,0.00037312898,0.00045150428],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015168162,0.00019615317,0.00029218756,0.00010642311,0.0019716595,0.00070562784,0.00039146308,0.00017741772,0.00015689833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003299607,0.00017840591,0.00016525632,0.00044936154,0.00015446532,0.00069667277,0.000011985237,0.00047301024,0.000117068324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011968684,0.0003100743,0.001962269,0.000020336396,0.00011104277,0.00055272906,0.046640236,0.000051225634,0.004515525,0.04087444,0.8571786,0.047663826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004414894,0.00008729208,0.00018072431,0.00007872761,0.000023164182,0.00011359809,0.0029845831,0.000010965208,0.00011389184,0.003976596,0.9916798,0.00030920477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004242522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043008727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43007547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021249121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004060288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99932766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W172843058","doi":"","title":"Supreme Court of Canada Rules that 'Private Study' Need Not be Done in 'Splendid Isolation' to Satisfy Fair Dealing Provisions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Agency (philosophy); Fair dealing; Copyright Act; Political science; Fair use; Copyright law; Business; Intellectual property; Sociology; Good faith","score_opus":0.021684638773484092,"score_gpt":0.28685737783063114,"score_spread":0.26517273905714706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W172843058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912527,0.0008119953,0.00070659275,0.0051178974,0.00035967966,0.00047477314,0.000011056626,0.000016797081,0.0012485079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99880105,0.000198622,0.00007414388,0.00013219673,0.000476602,0.000010444645,0.0000017559419,0.000015790309,0.00028940503],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963321,0.0002533429,0.00044227883,0.0001529128,0.000850532,0.0019688404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991343,0.00012666169,0.00025471783,0.00011319954,0.0001383552,0.00023273814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038657817,0.00013526081,0.00028834413,0.00014512311,0.00062235486,0.00006536771,0.00032715392,0.00006869452,0.00003981579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033725117,0.00012097192,0.000049533,0.00041208594,0.000041319752,0.00047986658,0.00004932023,0.0006984644,0.0000030888375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015946168,0.0004014023,0.67777634,0.000032191958,0.0002083425,0.0000062282156,0.042085174,0.00023969055,0.0017004373,0.272287,0.00079638005,0.0043073613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046752766,0.0016763998,0.40260026,0.0005308924,0.00022901798,0.00007575575,0.4307208,0.00011959546,0.0012833886,0.062136192,0.09402518,0.0019272385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.775623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9790401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38863564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015371335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064324704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99920017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1747210889","doi":"10.29173/alr97","title":"Potential for Genetic Discrimination in Access to Insurance: Is There a Dark Side to Increased Availability of Genetic Information?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Underwriting; Genetic discrimination; Actuarial science; Legislature; Medical underwriting; Business; Population; Private information retrieval; Genetic testing; Insurance policy; General insurance; Political science; Law; Medicine; Income protection insurance; Computer security; Computer science; Environmental health","score_opus":0.0182991260174569,"score_gpt":0.3120985351544801,"score_spread":0.2937994091370232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1747210889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94586205,0.008672569,0.00031642034,0.0104131885,0.0002043387,0.00746005,0.000035920428,0.000017974053,0.027017457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928985,0.0014406077,0.0003270236,0.004549665,0.000063805484,0.0006299522,0.0000060804027,0.000007191928,0.000077132885],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985368,0.00014384654,0.00062741066,0.00017687837,0.00028783316,0.00022719405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989455,0.00015392239,0.00018319147,0.0002175284,0.00036528587,0.00013461105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004315897,0.00010909128,0.00033059117,0.00004206739,0.00013859666,0.000127022,0.00038474277,0.00005766418,0.0002614524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090342003,0.00009162883,0.00007433422,0.0004918596,0.00005993153,0.0008130168,0.0000600262,0.000042029595,0.00013915809],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016211598,0.000727204,0.30012327,0.048481163,0.00014668783,0.0000020355178,0.050688963,0.00020961242,0.00040378695,0.048205156,0.05673828,0.49411172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045923566,0.00013687824,0.6498848,0.0038850429,0.000070324146,7.624011e-7,0.00032868612,0.00002795119,0.00015485595,0.005664022,0.33896983,0.00041757798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42298084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10478333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49369413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058698788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014414458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9115521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1749212531","doi":"","title":"Stories of 0s: Transgender Women, Monstrous Bodies, and the Canadian Prison System","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Transgender; Jurisprudence; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Context (archaeology); Political science; Criminal law; Gender studies; History","score_opus":0.029952102075931845,"score_gpt":0.29853962858674,"score_spread":0.26858752651080814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1749212531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8699719,0.053980105,0.00018095158,0.012883455,0.0027260573,0.000562009,0.000022977707,0.00004510324,0.059627492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980145,0.0008373864,0.000041684772,0.00009334675,0.00063202495,0.000006973034,8.61343e-8,0.00000950698,0.00036448136],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980511,0.00036586722,0.0005556113,0.000105265215,0.0005788366,0.00034329365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982637,0.00031241827,0.00048788442,0.00008820599,0.0006575961,0.0001901977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031205146,0.00013231338,0.00063260493,0.00010075716,0.0011867647,0.00011987434,0.00025130727,0.00007280048,0.00000327061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070460635,0.000079804224,0.000091429654,0.00014274321,0.0010998886,0.00029318835,0.000027021522,0.00021283282,9.117721e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000311018,0.00004439157,0.009368723,0.0005988228,0.0010293537,0.000033804718,0.6981804,0.00004261649,0.000026905962,0.28114787,0.004223137,0.0049929935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017545304,0.00031923928,0.0017849792,0.00037563764,0.00018035407,0.00004830395,0.39445966,0.000010090083,0.000053468048,0.002222474,0.5985407,0.00025051198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31306297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70004284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5943176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034221145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005656207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9127754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1752244394","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1109","title":"Whose Best Interests?: Custody and Access Law and Procedure","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Best interests; Premise; Law; Child custody; Contradiction; Political science; Normative; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0232905646197808,"score_gpt":0.3312614555548316,"score_spread":0.3079708909350508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1752244394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1533705,0.0009257592,0.00001848055,0.0029384608,0.0008093473,0.00017618439,0.0000044243734,0.00003996669,0.8417169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970038,0.00028770085,0.000097677526,0.0006380653,0.0014613459,0.000004785682,4.797634e-7,0.000015684453,0.00049045717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880475,0.000078034,0.00024093557,0.00021013079,0.0003248434,0.00034130557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912405,0.00006224177,0.000161665,0.00009087455,0.00017882066,0.00038235597],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068735366,0.00013547632,0.00020347306,0.000035999274,0.0017617167,0.0014011286,0.0003214999,0.00017117121,0.00013282511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001404524,0.00011023475,0.00003749008,0.00010880593,0.0006079297,0.0012691802,0.000109732144,0.00063255755,0.000014637197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017111912,0.00005329665,0.0055223377,0.000045289125,0.000018932484,0.000030458032,0.002463788,3.0398542e-7,0.0005752677,0.98864233,0.0005411928,0.0020896986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014342987,0.0002826143,0.0029273478,0.0005303222,0.000114466144,0.0008385697,0.006371576,0.000022867798,0.0008332375,0.3545892,0.63122225,0.0008332789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15621668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8325098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8436333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020812631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012274837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1768518597","doi":"","title":"Out in the Cold: Schreyer v Schreyer ’s Call for Law Reform","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.0373655364487764,"score_gpt":0.3053320849986185,"score_spread":0.26796654854984214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1768518597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056206476,0.0071942043,0.0026655265,0.009276358,0.0014787689,0.001493228,0.000006525429,0.0000885826,0.9215903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939487,0.00067397783,0.00004999321,0.00062887947,0.0009789206,0.000034606837,5.012721e-7,0.000014753474,0.0036696887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970842,0.00015835262,0.00029696905,0.00015462714,0.00038876946,0.0019170572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994492,0.000056236135,0.00014890112,0.00011955203,0.00014933458,0.000076803015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053781634,0.00011280149,0.0001714187,0.000058841997,0.00087594835,0.00012780227,0.0005784276,0.00012305158,0.000034978897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000113105554,0.00007303428,0.00010970213,0.00016129135,0.00015726268,0.00043748415,0.00001867571,0.0010071311,0.000040624185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003706617,0.00005061098,0.00045095128,0.0000052108367,0.000025093434,0.0000022314346,0.013714528,1.9262248e-7,0.00003201261,0.98435014,0.00022447846,0.0011074508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080870406,0.0003648207,0.00020756209,0.00004458781,0.000031180505,0.000030713163,0.03283601,0.0000025799484,0.000097024094,0.5274258,0.4379102,0.00024077362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04008784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49985853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93774223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009961191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023280985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9663043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W179309874","doi":"10.58948/2331-3528.1800","title":"Inconsistent Responsiveness Determination in Document Review: Difference of Opinion or Human Error?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pace law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Computer science; Human error; Quality (philosophy); Information retrieval; Psychology; Data science; Risk analysis (engineering); Epistemology; Medicine","score_opus":0.07820519774678054,"score_gpt":0.41734571862699993,"score_spread":0.3391405208802194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W179309874","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059890314,0.96063006,0.000021354968,0.00555252,0.00050256157,0.002080751,0.000004154659,0.0000345648,0.025184993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7329552,0.26552236,0.000035749472,0.0009430788,0.00010919398,0.000100207704,0.000003127183,0.000006267459,0.0003247791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795175,0.0007771663,0.0005064097,0.00014653159,0.0003696356,0.00024852404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908763,0.00015797051,0.00032777214,0.00018549037,0.00014783042,0.000093287366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026017993,0.00010603824,0.00048527736,0.0000283927,0.00015907457,0.00001545899,0.00018159457,0.00005257427,0.00012889548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006922764,0.00007787577,0.000074522264,0.0003894258,0.00012423564,0.00028242628,0.000047683265,0.00007993258,0.000019293728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006360505,0.00057245773,0.014913903,0.15271655,0.00003851966,0.000010025464,0.008451799,3.942681e-7,0.0004709448,0.70263743,0.004018829,0.11610555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014515762,0.00006170986,0.0029586258,0.07579434,0.000048443213,0.0000023954706,0.00019061593,3.4353002e-7,0.00008740863,0.00060628576,0.9199017,0.00020293402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064926753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062156627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9158829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011814331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011121009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9815026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W181195231","doi":"","title":"Joint Reform?: The Interplay of State, Federal, and Hemispheric Regulation of Recreational Marijuana and the Failed War on Drugs","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decriminalization; Legalization; State (computer science); Political science; Recreational use; Recreational Drug; Recreation; Joint (building); Criminology; Law; Medicine; Psychology; Psychiatry; Drug; Engineering","score_opus":0.008596425557281904,"score_gpt":0.24906123677223596,"score_spread":0.24046481121495406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W181195231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8329859,0.00024334344,0.000061616345,0.0059298505,0.00004743911,0.00043466093,0.0000017028698,0.000011170059,0.16028433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99664277,0.00017516626,0.000051869265,0.00011910166,0.000042433756,0.000014755367,9.646095e-7,0.0000029886287,0.0029499473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992875,0.00010580474,0.00021069209,0.00008626157,0.00022785705,0.000081870414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945116,0.00016462599,0.00014954004,0.000073858275,0.00013356403,0.000027228214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058309885,0.000052159485,0.00012985809,0.000012061391,0.00025710836,0.000050100043,0.00006966148,0.000031729167,0.00021709016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010270336,0.000023516259,0.000022313036,0.00010811951,0.0004162618,0.00018119697,0.000029466119,0.00004518573,0.000002318009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074987876,0.00017997599,0.013583426,0.0003695664,0.00026021196,3.20702e-7,0.2099049,0.000054252112,0.0065133465,0.6460963,0.021900889,0.10038697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005211698,0.00063984835,0.37942174,0.00088084815,0.00008383434,0.0000035277178,0.2311034,0.003695642,0.014236935,0.3362688,0.027697464,0.00075622933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08961835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028491616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36583832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027593995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004701023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91644394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1831315329","doi":"","title":"'Constitution Chicken': National Security Confidentiality and Terrorism Prosecutions after R. v. Ahmad","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Constitution; Jury; Confidentiality; Legislation; Parliament; Constitutional right; Terrorism; Trial court; National security; Politics","score_opus":0.010331544651187597,"score_gpt":0.29328166733078564,"score_spread":0.28295012267959807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1831315329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8716753,0.01594873,0.003230726,0.0037894438,0.0018754218,0.0004968946,0.00001981469,0.00009521742,0.10286844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960867,0.0010681301,0.000009515991,0.000108586704,0.0021810976,0.000014900162,0.0000023062257,0.000004894066,0.0005238755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755627,0.00019975347,0.00022980248,0.00012515868,0.00051234354,0.0013766608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940294,0.00003003196,0.00013175556,0.000048236525,0.00021344768,0.0001735582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037777936,0.00009739975,0.0001244468,0.00006685154,0.0010148244,0.00015091235,0.000109038716,0.00011556703,0.000074910764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020395289,0.0000889102,0.00006008616,0.00016604055,0.00031845985,0.0010005084,0.000025067618,0.0008178048,0.000025940548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016881972,0.00006220774,0.015664142,0.0000069042762,0.000040909665,4.2637168e-7,0.0051509724,2.3636306e-7,0.00003187898,0.9782921,0.00013822096,0.0005951388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005111388,0.000064984764,0.009849282,0.000039729646,0.000054667977,0.0001826404,0.0133993765,0.000004716212,0.00003820571,0.8516379,0.123922616,0.00029475745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048600812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015401698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1266542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007051136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002910572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8594509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W183155047","doi":"","title":"Legal aspects of carbon trading : Kyoto, Copenhagen, and beyond","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kyoto Protocol; Emissions trading; Carbon offset; Carbon market; Carbon fibers; International trade; Greenhouse gas; Political science; International economics; Business; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03198017485561127,"score_gpt":0.3339041531463252,"score_spread":0.30192397829071393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W183155047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36434922,0.00078514655,2.5682826e-7,0.00032534983,0.00021866956,0.0005007233,0.000009464882,0.000018090468,0.63379306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928789,0.0050139506,0.00008407265,0.000039215232,0.00049908005,0.000039546623,0.000004746008,0.000025451029,0.0014150076],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724054,0.00043593431,0.00061216176,0.00063458114,0.0004153756,0.0006614071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986623,0.00037873653,0.00024248568,0.00034957792,0.00013874029,0.00022817575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036828164,0.0002063057,0.00061556534,0.00031296248,0.00028034815,0.00024285045,0.00054291415,0.00045345922,0.000095947165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007262323,0.00022902801,0.00009391329,0.00019859837,0.0005853463,0.0001577438,0.00032594104,0.0010314723,0.000002198122],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026694572,0.0005233772,0.009124114,0.001589368,0.00030161501,0.0002478395,0.030628772,0.0007716781,0.001006279,0.15360337,0.000670445,0.8012662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034995032,0.0015528409,0.03450446,0.004273774,0.00014851414,0.000035398596,0.04103742,0.0055062925,0.006440219,0.1774357,0.72092205,0.0046438063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014802201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012935758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7966224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058296113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001693297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9917583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1854733578","doi":"","title":"Fathers Not Shortchanged by Current Adoption Legislation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Notice; Supreme court; Law; Best interests; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05667251494718964,"score_gpt":0.34153147649777804,"score_spread":0.28485896155058843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1854733578","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005224443,0.6665399,0.00015559443,0.0016963456,0.0012232017,0.0013078987,0.000049647966,0.00010895365,0.32369402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6833837,0.3157701,0.0000065286235,0.00040457296,0.0002979428,0.000029973873,0.000039962524,0.000008695009,0.000058541962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842787,0.00010523885,0.0004579813,0.00022127254,0.0005264204,0.00026118927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925506,0.000021357228,0.0002892443,0.00013908124,0.00016304184,0.00013220341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075365975,0.00014694057,0.00037472285,0.000019748093,0.0005176654,0.00002394219,0.00014666124,0.000062043146,0.000036822083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002645946,0.00011063603,0.00010638587,0.00020439299,0.00039213922,0.00044222298,0.00003152284,0.00014715698,0.000013285673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009950419,0.00011038522,0.00016441605,0.0040813945,0.000014000807,4.5018032e-7,0.0019152557,5.906148e-8,0.000025174068,0.87046915,0.0027048264,0.12050492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013849704,0.00004007917,0.000056982226,0.0036812525,0.000030020094,0.0000012334912,0.000078393954,0.0000017008335,0.00004929639,0.0003594045,0.9954154,0.00014775309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008628195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00233103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99271053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097309625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007686492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99797344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1855830533","doi":"","title":"Dispute over autism treatment heads to top court","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Europe PMC (PubMed Central)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Charter; Supreme court; Law; High Court; Political science; Remand (court procedure); Law of the case; Autism; Medicine; Court of record; Original jurisdiction; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.020576504590816717,"score_gpt":0.2668612368897832,"score_spread":0.24628473229896647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1855830533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63431907,0.0015199019,0.00031462964,0.009970078,0.004157006,0.0016439062,0.00003053071,0.0003243799,0.34772053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800047,0.00038840962,0.000103415754,0.00064944464,0.00060784136,0.000076734,0.0000024750916,0.000029470331,0.018137455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973281,0.0003138495,0.00026467306,0.0003970104,0.00046328898,0.0012330525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880236,0.00005478122,0.000075523916,0.0002419171,0.000059309114,0.00076611893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054195884,0.00019614428,0.00024917375,0.000053883952,0.0004528706,0.00021005492,0.00023802157,0.000075829834,0.0003567772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003928994,0.00016575455,0.00008481708,0.00060695974,0.00009159022,0.00023627814,0.000027242942,0.00009407715,0.00029516307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010624914,0.0009831812,0.18726827,0.00006119574,0.00023258387,0.00031748047,0.1521601,0.000076131975,0.00044482286,0.4977575,0.07350028,0.08709221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032112727,0.000062421575,0.059832543,0.000017660008,0.000019142191,0.0000016312863,0.00022681248,8.2715974e-7,0.0003746959,0.00031064026,0.93862146,0.00021105351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062115337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002400813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8651212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042114223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003573158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9390022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1864625425","doi":"","title":"The Constitutionality of Decolonization by Associated Statehood: Puerto Rico's Legal Status Reconsidered","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Political science; Constitutional law; Constitutionality; International law; Originalism; Treaty; Municipal law","score_opus":0.017918148097918234,"score_gpt":0.3145785384309697,"score_spread":0.29666039033305147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1864625425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0117947515,0.33951852,0.00011207468,0.04794032,0.001412143,0.0051764934,0.001174488,0.000287894,0.5925833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95527476,0.04099988,0.000026525306,0.002400748,0.000062927975,0.000028147531,0.00003879387,0.0000065710697,0.00116166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751735,0.0006701767,0.00065983384,0.00021513404,0.0005476767,0.00038985844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827117,0.00040265496,0.0004907645,0.00018028007,0.00051402464,0.00014112552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00200831,0.00013433093,0.00042965444,0.000014977513,0.0012434066,0.00008532161,0.00022376928,0.00010473335,0.00011189461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021815863,0.00010206898,0.000105870924,0.0006888744,0.0004331014,0.00034127786,0.000019182142,0.00012223066,0.000016021762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013784505,0.00010062711,0.00026840135,0.00013562987,0.000030353785,0.0000042260613,0.00010567291,7.555576e-7,0.000021047283,0.8939839,0.10279118,0.0025444268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024762732,0.00005986766,0.00031131212,0.0006609849,0.00004662025,0.0000012690195,0.00013429017,0.0000022305533,0.000046670906,0.0041711493,0.99418235,0.0001356046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017867688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02841524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024056941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010329253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98931366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1867839040","doi":"","title":"The Preservation Obligation: Regulating and Sanctioning Pre-Litigation Spoliation in Federal Court","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Sanctions; Law; Obligation; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Political science; Summary judgment; Pension; Misconduct; Civil procedure; Supreme court","score_opus":0.0541456604935297,"score_gpt":0.32113545725217446,"score_spread":0.26698979675864476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1867839040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27523446,0.11618554,0.0016108461,0.020420829,0.0015154518,0.005661617,0.000005178116,0.00034227918,0.5790238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922109,0.0065672076,0.00017948815,0.00035632853,0.00023952281,0.00008104728,0.000005718301,0.000006128136,0.00035362007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989834,0.00017703362,0.0003230328,0.00013134521,0.00022571553,0.00015949795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994622,0.000079893296,0.00020524928,0.0000872582,0.00012746839,0.000037936545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001535986,0.00006329158,0.0001242956,0.00001354662,0.0010068195,0.00012146151,0.00008118334,0.000048869733,0.000029608487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036574653,0.000049303027,0.000025082689,0.00026259897,0.00009890999,0.00088740996,0.000017744018,0.000072916606,0.0000041619905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007407794,0.000011225821,0.01792337,0.0005523733,0.000005964164,2.8182225e-7,0.004759778,0.000002227981,0.0000063966972,0.9568833,0.0004976984,0.019349981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034287115,0.00007034854,0.10359623,0.006188187,0.000029456816,0.0000029282492,0.0012258334,0.00028367274,0.000085489075,0.1285368,0.7593337,0.0003044616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022350768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021650162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8283465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006353315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006170689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1868157597","doi":"","title":"A Life of H. L. A. Hart: The Nightmare and the Noble Dream","year":2004,"lang":"ceb","type":"book","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dream; Aside; Biography; Law; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; History; Political science; Art; Literature; Psychology","score_opus":0.021763474336079617,"score_gpt":0.28486191129631,"score_spread":0.2630984369602304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1868157597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87750196,0.0026691875,0.000009074816,0.03346872,0.00083806994,0.001611848,0.0012186028,0.000018888682,0.082663625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842327,0.0088647725,0.00017820548,0.003180372,0.0012451588,0.000016443286,0.0000119330425,0.0000488148,0.0022215883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99070054,0.00032702935,0.003063884,0.0017531471,0.00074867386,0.0034067342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872799,0.0030114702,0.0017462742,0.0011454762,0.001012083,0.0058048028],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010222937,0.0009194955,0.0026147831,0.00061745616,0.0020114216,0.0012770649,0.003155697,0.00060855475,0.00029287764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076470384,0.0005993874,0.0005009728,0.0008711366,0.057035636,0.0018251623,0.001643167,0.0011376782,0.000027240303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022186646,0.00017564565,0.0021032628,0.00020514897,0.00008863373,0.0000011447488,0.0007616037,0.00006636063,0.000037416983,0.99583083,0.00008761176,0.00042048946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051993555,0.0014265525,0.0147593925,0.0010171222,0.0006706871,0.000076252676,0.011479981,0.0038410358,0.00095688354,0.9050044,0.05367521,0.0018931306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042102233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039838594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10673073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011474746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025603756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1873752839","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4502","title":"Politics and Policy Change in American Administrative Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Agency (philosophy); Politics; Law; Political science; Arbitrariness; Abandonment (legal); Law and economics; Administrative law; Position (finance); Sociology; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.07245255672048595,"score_gpt":0.4187299525912302,"score_spread":0.34627739587074424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1873752839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7773841,0.000043013606,0.000005800414,0.0064202095,0.00022828844,0.00041023333,0.000019924524,0.00002840513,0.21546003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967645,0.00002219744,0.0001531536,0.0015844599,0.0012166979,0.000024354384,5.681338e-7,0.000010134683,0.00022393756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902624,0.00005532545,0.00019250003,0.00018114345,0.0002445075,0.00030030406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993172,0.00013683121,0.00011220975,0.000115948766,0.000111370544,0.00020638815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027633924,0.00008963712,0.00020725606,0.00013103892,0.00015603243,0.00012124124,0.00030610355,0.000067602006,0.00003820559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048200376,0.000089504814,0.000019738585,0.0005016175,0.0005537495,0.00043142136,0.000089294175,0.00016395457,0.000010234215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027324257,0.000094492854,0.022022428,0.00015191386,0.000011302904,0.000009913008,0.0362958,7.5374237e-7,0.00070027955,0.93571025,0.00016839153,0.0048071267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010684159,0.00071406725,0.5618572,0.0004031626,0.00017181618,0.0000056121567,0.027017614,0.00002884443,0.0036087038,0.014567516,0.3895301,0.0010269287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29951894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1261942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92114276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003061033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027893804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8897505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1876411196","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/6tjr9","title":"Decentralizing Family: An Inclusive Proposal for Individual Tax Filing in the United States","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interdependence; Sketch; Law and economics; Income tax; Political science; Tax reform; Law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.047030240200316646,"score_gpt":0.3653939792759077,"score_spread":0.31836373907559107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1876411196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97755516,0.0000739433,0.0009576068,0.0045136907,0.00030004804,0.0009921729,0.000034175293,0.00007900824,0.015494172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99669164,0.000020256244,0.0008029937,0.0015413068,0.0007547669,0.000033186792,0.000042202137,0.000007600019,0.000106055224],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875206,0.00021773171,0.00018400667,0.00016121022,0.00032845009,0.00035655717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994253,0.00020713313,0.00006683365,0.000080853315,0.00015808556,0.00006181313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014997256,0.00007716235,0.00010231294,0.00007601206,0.0009374075,0.00023682251,0.00037050064,0.000070722606,0.00003093782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027117255,0.000050407605,0.000023689521,0.0005753813,0.00024603918,0.00033245678,0.000042711294,0.00007744587,0.000005955949],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006973175,0.00019210408,0.009118905,0.000046477508,0.000031974047,0.0000051897523,0.54789287,0.000040736122,0.00021912566,0.42520526,0.01029708,0.0068805283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006850847,0.00045196427,0.0031389447,0.000075089745,0.000026109376,7.8568934e-7,0.46035314,0.0009977479,0.00058065966,0.08253688,0.45080623,0.00034736542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10923743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12224518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44050914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004606402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003315815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89669424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1888161112","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1257","title":"The Day the Dialogue Died: A Comment on Sauve v. Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Political science; Law; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.016729205297561806,"score_gpt":0.2717723883430372,"score_spread":0.25504318304547535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1888161112","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006812304,0.00063567463,0.00015206648,0.08153648,0.0022010119,0.00017849676,0.00000556474,0.000015853726,0.91459364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988403,0.00017124099,0.000006406387,0.008642157,0.002113178,0.0000036625468,6.1072865e-7,0.000009489308,0.00065024826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782604,0.00038083372,0.00029889584,0.000109293986,0.0008526391,0.00053230044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827427,0.0010197749,0.00019814557,0.00015514148,0.00013289439,0.0002197893],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049735038,0.000106972206,0.00012729272,0.000011580575,0.0063284608,0.00039998503,0.00056879205,0.000058756497,0.00004546207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003025771,0.000054042655,0.00006633894,0.00013885376,0.00026364165,0.00010720937,0.000038164682,0.00046319215,0.000014511652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002035832,0.000022883663,0.0003092414,0.0000018003569,0.00003141531,0.000053075706,0.0025730925,0.000010694791,0.0000037848015,0.9277846,0.06317223,0.0060168095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013492219,0.00003813705,0.0005251574,0.000030753843,0.000010656439,0.0000121934945,0.0050428202,0.0000020126035,0.000040235507,0.024683781,0.96938694,0.00009239575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9914689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9877218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003756375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056178693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99496514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1895800542","doi":"","title":"The Appropriate Role of the Courts in Interpreting the GST Legislation: Reflections on the Canadian Experience","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.021609594344825855,"score_gpt":0.3032304733417238,"score_spread":0.28162087899689797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1895800542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12395514,0.00013454161,0.000011711213,0.032467682,0.00035178903,0.00035499298,0.0000012364416,0.000013779095,0.8427091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99719286,0.000006342144,0.0000028337076,0.00040325624,0.0002295796,0.00004083232,1.14379e-7,0.0000036124545,0.0021205945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895304,0.0002538271,0.00018306109,0.00009804875,0.00029675354,0.00021524422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929124,0.00032032738,0.00009757223,0.00018702303,0.00007856712,0.0000252438],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010291978,0.000055108972,0.000056843575,0.000017927732,0.0029395297,0.0002297583,0.0004660325,0.00004406893,0.000039711336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003280976,0.00002077929,0.000037158716,0.00041767274,0.00042443068,0.00008969979,0.000027712122,0.00015552925,0.0000056224676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039478846,0.000011063874,0.005888002,9.4660584e-7,0.0000037181546,1.8836029e-7,0.06205345,0.0001503042,0.0001254916,0.9293317,0.001180695,0.001250496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075568954,0.00002103998,0.012835243,0.00008350824,0.000005782798,8.661033e-7,0.1416681,0.00041802786,0.0007714234,0.061996907,0.7819845,0.0001390435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9313345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99092394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87323767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001267649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003837383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W190042589","doi":"","title":"Paul T. Takagi Honored","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice A Journal of Crime Conflict & World Order","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ceremony; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.053824508817645424,"score_gpt":0.3422315353053557,"score_spread":0.28840702648771027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W190042589","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15836371,0.012672667,0.001487684,0.031136923,0.008259986,0.0007407248,0.000022456834,0.00021222017,0.7871036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97543347,0.0005728181,0.0002829783,0.001899996,0.008289075,0.0000037220723,0.0000012637698,0.000030250178,0.0134864235],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725753,0.0002906889,0.0007388769,0.00017912753,0.0009900043,0.00054376305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968619,0.0002843529,0.00072607095,0.00010532904,0.0017337253,0.00028866556],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010193854,0.0002005447,0.00054035865,0.00023958522,0.0017399988,0.000131296,0.0005066824,0.00014708028,0.00072533987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011069383,0.00018401869,0.00024121003,0.0011677098,0.0006076931,0.00061285065,0.00004508291,0.000503878,0.000084301646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054896815,0.00061800773,0.0029019848,0.00030618938,0.00055949745,0.00085053686,0.20180751,0.000027637298,0.0012845682,0.11947095,0.66225696,0.0093672285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008065625,0.000078085,0.0028904781,0.000062065694,0.00032097453,0.000035397905,0.009583989,0.0000021223675,0.000100044934,0.000863992,0.98498464,0.00027163303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023165871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012500655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81706977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014210856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015523697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1914405500","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: The Law of Canada: Statutes and Regulations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.11203312431465048,"score_gpt":0.39313218609290285,"score_spread":0.2810990617782524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1914405500","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017244964,0.0070412103,0.0000021251287,0.01613779,0.0004951319,0.00034042064,0.0000892041,0.00001812568,0.97570354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43094352,0.0014156234,0.00010346895,0.0006171392,0.0030104716,0.000040493233,0.00003233875,0.000031955664,0.563805],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972925,0.00040419569,0.00031236082,0.00018507443,0.0014544609,0.00035136673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997233,0.0008493467,0.00013246195,0.00021239773,0.0014350038,0.00013782215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038112812,0.00009370663,0.00024608878,0.000052837604,0.0011460189,0.00013853614,0.0004149634,0.00017707674,0.00014749428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011803356,0.00005856834,0.000023645925,0.00040964782,0.0011810182,0.00012837515,0.0001140203,0.0002737745,0.0000018230309],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011352427,0.000002642578,0.000018571767,0.000041488645,0.000011737956,6.4131893e-7,0.00216099,8.9979704e-7,3.6265922e-7,0.3577457,0.6398863,0.00012951593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033812463,0.000014121284,0.00004525006,0.00009449478,0.0000083818895,2.3202247e-7,0.019679215,0.0000014011688,0.000007511591,0.027168669,0.9528731,0.000073829695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43077108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001963982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010200431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1926460403","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.31553","title":"IN THE MATTER OF THE FEMALE MIND: AN ANALYSIS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA’S APPROACH TO WOMEN AND MENTAL HEALTH","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Mental health; Law; Psychology; Political science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.03688513608631631,"score_gpt":0.33467628247499454,"score_spread":0.2977911463886782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1926460403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97489643,0.000044791526,0.0000050266262,0.017780183,0.00007278307,0.00034335357,0.00013866695,0.0000010406118,0.0067177243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99944663,0.0000011964931,0.000015228923,0.0004575592,0.000024037126,0.000015844216,7.851115e-7,0.0000027793562,0.000035965455],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982571,0.00052005256,0.0003243353,0.00017096207,0.00047591567,0.0002516378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993013,0.0001672066,0.00006805886,0.000306012,0.000059516013,0.00009789387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010795883,0.0000711348,0.00029017235,0.000016083284,0.0002140034,0.000015248212,0.00044387096,0.000031177227,0.00011958061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037153784,0.000035416124,0.00006761448,0.00042672525,0.0019767117,0.00011697863,0.000069794776,0.00006991566,1.1947472e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020133282,0.00074745686,0.793794,0.00016258728,0.000037338454,4.667215e-8,0.17649676,0.0000046278774,0.00002204194,0.028161306,0.0004805579,0.00007316757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046994388,0.0000350026,0.7915693,0.00002045801,0.00003940159,1.3334136e-7,0.2061085,0.000013606361,0.00006908165,0.0018554346,0.00019032626,0.000051763058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70857084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8170732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.108502425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010922178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044307156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72832763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1939758794","doi":"10.29173/alr295","title":"Litigating Shut-in for Lack of a Market: A Comment on Stewart Estate v. TAQA North Ltd.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Lease; Shut down; Freehold; Natural gas; Estate; Business; Payment; Expansive; Finance; Real estate; Commerce; Economics; Engineering; Law; Waste management; Political science","score_opus":0.09980463436795538,"score_gpt":0.3757299032898299,"score_spread":0.2759252689218745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1939758794","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014456233,0.02530181,0.000013918055,0.054283146,0.00046059905,0.003915081,0.000037776656,0.000036214828,0.9014952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9629523,0.013945766,0.00020733195,0.018840859,0.00031242275,0.00033895468,0.00002058059,0.000034137818,0.0033476457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985163,0.00024339238,0.00047001417,0.00019322432,0.00029617653,0.0002808726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987608,0.0005443331,0.00023203382,0.00016727643,0.00015261864,0.0001429343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014722896,0.00011292008,0.00044773263,0.00001738675,0.000116757226,0.00002901022,0.0002062331,0.000042262236,0.00005566039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00096910226,0.00009337867,0.00009155201,0.00028358615,0.00010487757,0.0001431347,0.00002951133,0.00007203967,0.000028517521],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011599943,0.0005373927,0.012570473,0.015747964,0.0001025172,0.000009307952,0.023218643,0.000009921753,0.0000055647797,0.67608225,0.21351732,0.05808262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026064503,0.000106044536,0.000059465387,0.004057081,0.000023165983,2.686014e-7,0.00024607757,0.000008430678,0.000007921156,0.000728622,0.9943856,0.00011666211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17941211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25485885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94849604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007514601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018049638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82605225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1941005615","doi":"","title":"INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LITIGATION IN THE UNITED STATES AND CANADIAN COURTS","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"공법학연구","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personal jurisdiction; Alien Tort Statute; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Charter; Sovereign immunity; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Tort; Torture; Human rights; Sovereignty; Original jurisdiction; Supreme court; Liability; Politics","score_opus":0.016550471507339817,"score_gpt":0.2948294795397938,"score_spread":0.27827900803245403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1941005615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9150077,0.000022911274,0.0000045597303,0.0093116965,0.00011353395,0.00008962141,0.000004601786,0.0000098515175,0.07543552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999217,0.000013098936,0.000006131483,0.00040221258,0.0001865,0.0000045526067,0.000023289362,0.0000015547724,0.00014569634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995709,0.000040948493,0.000069913,0.00006239814,0.00014636741,0.000109478904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998282,0.000021856176,0.000021360458,0.000030266498,0.00004545829,0.000052809446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028417405,0.000029826693,0.00003398503,0.000074538184,0.0004363617,0.0001102786,0.00010294435,0.000030707713,0.00003661073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000255727,0.000021921926,0.000006238714,0.0001441584,0.000081022736,0.00012274542,0.0000041975404,0.000049766437,0.0000065756417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017158801,0.000022465261,0.009807604,0.000005363522,0.000007146186,0.000019441371,0.08179624,0.0000739323,0.000017537419,0.9065004,0.0014186216,0.00032950987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002042103,0.000014286104,0.021334114,0.00003358061,0.0000023278747,9.2687606e-7,0.0042692455,0.000010763639,0.000025158604,0.16295303,0.8110819,0.0000704503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97517467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97304034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8096633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000986034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008345846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33561856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1946532422","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpv110","title":"Sweet success: ‘Valentine Secret’ not confusing with ‘Victoria's Secret’, rules Federal Court of Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Trade secret; Federal court; Law; Political science; Advertising; Business; Intellectual property; Supreme court","score_opus":0.03821629386603757,"score_gpt":0.289577209192768,"score_spread":0.25136091532673044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1946532422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39525583,0.0024604325,0.0013327287,0.029466733,0.003466102,0.0007953263,0.000025448702,0.00006156937,0.5671358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941163,0.00012660271,0.00068192405,0.0012412266,0.0015525428,0.0000024568765,0.0000016766361,0.000031859236,0.0022454301],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99559844,0.00072694564,0.00093645114,0.00022262886,0.002029622,0.00048589884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99230164,0.0012855304,0.0014716267,0.0001648485,0.0042985003,0.00047783076],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035771353,0.00024035407,0.00062814093,0.00007436248,0.0006263379,0.00037002275,0.0005316914,0.00014044218,0.00023516576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011543982,0.00014221942,0.00009142174,0.0003858152,0.00043256028,0.0019566831,0.000072665076,0.00063523627,0.000008370329],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.04531679,0.002860018,0.005013664,0.0014155209,0.004553869,0.002469223,0.37388703,0.001357196,0.007225975,0.0714206,0.47593796,0.008542145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00101566,0.001053367,0.000021922688,0.0003828647,0.00015256315,0.00027784784,0.026361194,0.000080456906,0.002606095,0.0001743085,0.96756583,0.0003078584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8158454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56760424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59886044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049110816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009188309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W194656709","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Legal Perspective on Challenging Enforcement of the $18.2 Billion Ecuadorian Judgment against Chevron - Part I: Contesting the Jurisdiction of the Ontario Superior Court","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TDM","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chevron (anatomy); Jurisdiction; Perspective (graphical); Enforcement; Political science; Law; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.03385950939696475,"score_gpt":0.2776266211246042,"score_spread":0.24376711172763943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W194656709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6566443,0.00084219227,0.0000028921381,0.01443496,0.0034562182,0.0011917969,0.000012248484,0.000021792917,0.3233936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99792135,0.000048530997,0.0000011432043,0.0002083065,0.0007994882,0.000028280154,5.639667e-7,0.000008477292,0.00098384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842256,0.00021329164,0.0002603786,0.00012290616,0.00058609404,0.00039474896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991074,0.000143547,0.00022943273,0.0002519476,0.00017658355,0.00009109215],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015467291,0.00011102237,0.00013738083,0.000024891706,0.0026020731,0.000076136675,0.00038837135,0.000068227164,0.000052215786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022957346,0.00004947227,0.00010646006,0.00021900595,0.0003528787,0.00014743437,0.00004833248,0.0002515353,0.0000036030397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057602436,0.00014149598,0.03589896,0.000035331617,0.00017512783,7.124163e-7,0.42808926,0.00060160377,0.0004170129,0.52672315,0.0029906041,0.0048691817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037049782,0.00011951841,0.04605767,0.00038163541,0.00007562534,0.000001287873,0.12296676,0.000075633776,0.0019825366,0.00058135216,0.82717013,0.000217343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95882744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9803753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82417953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014065799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091487734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1950996903","doi":"","title":"A CRITIQUE OF THE BRITISH COLUMBIA RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE BROKERAGE INDUSTRY’S USE OF DUAL AGENCY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Real estate; Agency (philosophy); Dual (grammatical number); Business; Estate; Real estate development; Finance; Public relations; Public administration; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05093970985968707,"score_gpt":0.3211113976777358,"score_spread":0.2701716878180487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1950996903","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36238092,0.033127964,0.000003778312,0.0002402199,0.00088081945,0.0015160922,0.0001910882,0.000038804275,0.6016203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8616336,0.13776773,0.000012696215,0.00014330563,0.00010639834,0.00001529051,0.0000042323068,0.000009619121,0.00030712356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981462,0.00023325592,0.0007400757,0.0001852656,0.00045706605,0.00023815731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880034,0.00003310865,0.00053593796,0.0002181734,0.0003098255,0.000102626465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008832876,0.00009789239,0.00047728763,0.0000087656745,0.00041246146,0.00009907683,0.00024423315,0.00013145755,0.00010844686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010556749,0.00008839584,0.00015400413,0.00024383243,0.0008645595,0.0004290491,0.00010777343,0.00023898005,7.407083e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031638392,0.0005060444,0.007590517,0.029397553,0.0001047118,0.0000136392955,0.008206211,4.7527074e-8,0.00006336846,0.85645753,0.0059846737,0.09164405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003924775,0.00016825601,0.013383635,0.028965224,0.00018168692,0.000011756921,0.0003735529,3.7844083e-7,0.0002768528,0.0046855668,0.95125914,0.00030145957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.878552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69934887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9452745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003411917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020860347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3604678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W195506792","doi":"","title":"Canada’s Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act and Secret Commissions Offense","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American University international law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; Ratification; Legislation; Language change; Enforcement; Convention; Law; Political science; Business; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.02130956694984576,"score_gpt":0.27143593421231443,"score_spread":0.2501263672624687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W195506792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019333608,0.0012289529,0.00041468279,0.02100208,0.00022854673,0.00032892512,0.00008784517,0.000035598125,0.95733976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99365455,0.0041221045,0.000041959436,0.0014698844,0.000065662825,3.0297477e-7,0.00001352444,0.000002883789,0.0006291323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991625,0.00017778711,0.00013526222,0.00010912895,0.00030940768,0.0001059478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916387,0.00015234094,0.00024438967,0.00007362479,0.00025464455,0.00011115422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036874076,0.000057800728,0.0002170763,0.00002917598,0.00024038545,0.000016343507,0.00022757034,0.000018377283,0.00014541009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032653226,0.00005716536,0.000038992832,0.00017554197,0.00035968196,0.00016613949,0.000046553145,0.000052676358,0.0000024471394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056801714,0.000014500258,0.002458419,0.00007412243,0.00002263053,0.00000153916,0.000090964204,4.0891373e-7,0.000008254646,0.98413074,0.0037178015,0.0094749415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060110044,0.000026736901,0.0010288297,0.00028493756,0.000019966887,9.689747e-7,0.00045071478,0.000009361591,0.0000031890265,0.0002164013,0.99783313,0.00006563824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91399705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8064059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99411535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013860637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005876455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23311359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965708235","doi":"10.2307/3504645","title":"10.2307/3504645","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Political philosophy; State (computer science); Law; Political science; Sociology; Applied philosophy; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Comparative law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.008321394201013394,"score_gpt":0.22492051744548167,"score_spread":0.21659912324446828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965708235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010004919,0.000089398476,2.9392606e-7,0.0011233719,0.0000063999373,0.00014410946,0.0000034736895,0.00012493577,0.9975075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014211983,9.635273e-7,0.000014391696,0.000109663706,0.0005901165,0.000009961095,0.0000013708567,0.00000840778,0.9850531],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991865,0.0000554824,0.00011397909,0.00014145905,0.0002513829,0.00025115928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963456,0.00003549901,0.000019839064,0.00010006861,0.000052239364,0.00015781568],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026300602,0.00006477649,0.000110284695,0.000028020784,0.000322263,0.00008825952,0.00019665713,0.00005674157,0.99064785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007925043,0.00006119642,0.00003450643,0.0002926999,0.000058774353,0.00015222203,0.0000134913535,0.000046979218,0.9761655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021867496,0.00003053612,0.0000011660363,0.000004891033,0.000007402634,0.000004021518,0.0007265737,0.000008429716,0.000014182237,0.0001608882,0.28019032,0.7188297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054637156,0.000036448353,0.000017841363,0.000011752071,0.0000042811594,3.6530747e-7,0.00001610844,0.0000025350407,0.000010182614,0.00006410536,0.9996851,0.00009663894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052498784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003460255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71949476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036430374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009069694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7936281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967693510","doi":"10.1080/01947640903356183","title":"The Campaign to Deny Terminally Ill Patients Information and Choices at the End of Life","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Medicine","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Legislation; Commit; Supreme court; Government (linguistics); Terminally ill; Death with dignity; Order (exchange); Law; Health care; Assisted suicide; Political science; Medicine; Palliative care; Family medicine; Nursing; Business","score_opus":0.008837790986566299,"score_gpt":0.27901969817062305,"score_spread":0.27018190718405677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967693510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92624986,0.0017041898,0.000036053985,0.051265374,0.00061511056,0.00021776538,0.0000019009591,0.0000041613316,0.019905591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957688,0.0002292032,0.000011295621,0.0028457183,0.0008309094,7.1567456e-7,2.7308744e-7,0.0000017064443,0.00031141742],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984844,0.00009089585,0.0005242029,0.000038182683,0.0007255327,0.00013681148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821144,0.00025408654,0.0005939301,0.000063290485,0.0007224274,0.00015480578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001482994,0.00006229239,0.00018663237,0.00005580706,0.0004328595,0.00005644603,0.0002253206,0.000035690933,0.000023903265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029964105,0.000027468139,0.000030711697,0.0001933447,0.00026267447,0.0005587142,0.000019486863,0.00011895969,0.0000025869929],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014239273,0.00018900627,0.094794825,0.00015255949,0.00018221902,0.000016071692,0.18375753,0.000042554348,0.0011382715,0.018074041,0.13994452,0.5602845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006737455,0.0011399435,0.12291671,0.00022825075,0.000038094586,0.0000075015823,0.0074163736,0.0000023684865,0.0000669035,0.00044841322,0.86699724,0.000064461005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002216851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017894149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7270527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000475837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017496583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35871997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980009831","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.1769","title":"Ontario Court of Appeal Takes a Spin at Roulette: <i>Moreira v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corp.</i> , 2013 ONCA 121, February 26, 2013","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Roulette; Appeal; Lottery; Law; Political science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02047576640537435,"score_gpt":0.2381419362012918,"score_spread":0.21766616979591744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980009831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92084163,0.048695028,0.000015017326,0.004774069,0.00040519267,0.0010556151,0.000011549932,0.000047110836,0.02415476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9437946,0.043561157,0.00048086248,0.00610228,0.0004611266,0.00008808155,0.000017638724,0.000049320137,0.005444907],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982153,0.000079121965,0.0006995654,0.00042527125,0.00012389873,0.0004568423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891126,0.00008915885,0.00045755695,0.00022362958,0.00008690911,0.00023147951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073713594,0.00025749346,0.0008172993,0.00003686632,0.000518183,0.00018933942,0.00020076186,0.00015096557,0.0004803903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022389244,0.00024459563,0.00010515278,0.00006538686,0.00040508856,0.00075996347,0.00011554639,0.00021892317,0.000115006216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095603646,0.0004615571,0.4763683,0.014997805,0.00086879474,0.000040322717,0.06859565,0.00004219653,0.0003599792,0.1041502,0.25841236,0.07560724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036461678,0.000085905696,0.02207925,0.0013823297,0.00015835247,0.000022253691,0.00040982332,0.000019454814,0.000015014038,0.0006367306,0.97432995,0.00049631135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9447466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9614329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7159176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041783554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029380713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992990269","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.46.3.231","title":"The Youth Criminal Justice Act: New Directions and Implementation Issues","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Proportionality (law); Presumption; Seriousness; Political science; Criminal justice; Accountability; Sentencing guidelines; Economic Justice; Criminology; Law; Restorative justice; Psychology","score_opus":0.09592288235905266,"score_gpt":0.35514754309255103,"score_spread":0.25922466073349837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992990269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96160424,0.0104898885,0.000995919,0.017409865,0.0019015609,0.00030057252,0.000036300105,0.000044816643,0.007216851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98651886,0.007827725,0.0012160781,0.0015758334,0.0022916007,0.000013004978,0.000006735271,0.000036688456,0.000513481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963134,0.000567494,0.00075718696,0.00042671734,0.00019778154,0.0017374273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99535125,0.0011167913,0.00054658257,0.0002562821,0.0006397214,0.0020893393],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00231299,0.00036989927,0.00051725254,0.0004420635,0.002984201,0.00049871474,0.0006675471,0.00046488733,0.00006096896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050886963,0.0003419362,0.00012586974,0.00020627849,0.0015080194,0.0006233692,0.000057756704,0.0010269105,0.0000065241998],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020490425,0.000047820547,0.0007919061,0.0015448303,0.00017701247,0.0013545543,0.40812624,0.00017447199,0.0001569966,0.53195035,0.002638048,0.05283288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009875258,0.00061454036,0.01209905,0.00027167486,0.015252972,0.0025184213,0.888036,0.000008146771,0.00013180895,0.012300913,0.06727918,0.0004997339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3253205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6630904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5196494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011044515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009634244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995526659","doi":"10.3821/1913701x2008141135cbspfa20co2","title":"Competition Bureau Shouldn't Point Finger at Pharmacies:","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Pharmacy; Business; Point (geometry); Advertising; Medicine; Family medicine; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06667409077087244,"score_gpt":0.30410650509887455,"score_spread":0.2374324143280021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995526659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87648076,0.0038558068,0.0001612906,0.0018288003,0.009306357,0.0009175648,0.00050128985,0.0001786744,0.10676948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97657895,0.010125305,0.000059730428,0.0040730694,0.0038376916,0.000022321341,0.000033098127,0.00006194788,0.00520788],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956616,0.00040217038,0.00073872803,0.0004889545,0.0010730078,0.0016355381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99484426,0.00016055998,0.00036998943,0.00021394211,0.00092294224,0.0034883036],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011078207,0.00041981702,0.0004917457,0.00037012665,0.0066253175,0.0002787089,0.0008512996,0.00012536043,0.0049048276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003549755,0.00045374647,0.000225172,0.0009760327,0.000795389,0.00094253314,0.00006306255,0.0007476377,0.0000991814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031368114,0.00020351195,0.0074664257,0.00043981505,0.00055764243,0.25734273,0.05778447,0.0010399297,0.0063079777,0.004336272,0.6326993,0.03150824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012134544,0.000029128927,0.000016096512,0.00003106269,0.000080277845,0.18783881,0.000117393734,0.00020807801,0.001210064,0.00027675054,0.80826,0.0007188927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41673756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6508645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23412693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065926826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007944615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995732436","doi":"10.1163/1571818041904308","title":"Nowhere to turn: The Supreme Court of Canada's denial of a constitutionally-based governmental fiduciary duty to children in foster care","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Children s Rights","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Denial; Fiduciary; Supreme court; Law; Duty; Duty of care; Political science; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.005898822853987835,"score_gpt":0.24837747402933286,"score_spread":0.24247865117534503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995732436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9743848,0.00019975996,0.00009303373,0.020603696,0.00059119536,0.00034346117,0.00018508354,0.000002685348,0.003596325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99814993,0.0000041578287,0.00009317774,0.00096052414,0.0007467501,0.0000026288515,0.000004463731,0.0000051269058,0.000033235767],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974481,0.00009031815,0.0005238005,0.0001066228,0.001661211,0.00016996595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987344,0.00011363774,0.00037860326,0.00010229102,0.00056901143,0.00010206648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050297054,0.00010600566,0.0002181514,0.00007966997,0.0001879834,0.000042930358,0.0010279249,0.00004568111,0.000067543486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001277003,0.000061281644,0.00010385191,0.00017376844,0.00018894611,0.00013495663,0.000068411566,0.00017157843,0.0000022672514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005809869,0.0018263182,0.5228747,0.000070647126,0.003236216,0.00028758397,0.12896837,0.045070715,0.005146981,0.23270379,0.05008848,0.0039162976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008453582,0.00079919613,0.8728361,0.0025279014,0.00022241175,0.00034464634,0.007862235,0.000010556422,0.055436067,0.017407056,0.03318694,0.00091328344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.505423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83418846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3499614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008317578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025746948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49787045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003235112","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1280","title":"The Efficacy of Regulation as a Function of Psychological Fit: Reexamining the Hard Law/Soft Law Continuum","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Hard law; Soft law; Law; Compliance (psychology); Perspective (graphical); Function (biology); Incentive; Philosophy of law; Psychology; Social psychology; Comparative law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; International law","score_opus":0.07379689688929711,"score_gpt":0.34910201110018635,"score_spread":0.2753051142108892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003235112","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32259986,0.00027136793,0.0023908054,0.0011606594,0.0008126086,0.00049665227,0.000003360035,0.000060681177,0.672204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991361,0.000016566872,0.000043082382,0.00037415547,0.0002546742,0.00001666527,9.162418e-7,0.000008813206,0.00014905081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980733,0.00058202515,0.00048028617,0.00019408709,0.00039293687,0.00027739932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978582,0.0014292074,0.00020445044,0.00028516736,0.00017103527,0.000051928997],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024160328,0.000105577536,0.0002421561,0.000014820405,0.0005379921,0.00005296875,0.0004061604,0.00017322939,0.00033230227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010097023,0.00005893622,0.00007556901,0.00026002078,0.069849916,0.00017177216,0.00007606051,0.00019346632,0.000014673051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038777103,0.00008042866,0.00020162035,0.000009915074,0.00001176732,6.9954405e-7,0.010240399,8.414486e-7,0.00012621828,0.98790157,0.000103796425,0.0009349862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032122343,0.00035386585,0.0024504794,0.00008758888,0.000026773292,9.3187606e-7,0.003666084,0.000006151737,0.0009069573,0.9797868,0.012293222,0.000099910256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013388168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010632835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6765362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020650978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027669208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93268144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003496468","doi":"10.1258/rsmmlj.75.2.37","title":"A Claim Delayed May Be a Claim Denied","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Medico-Legal Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Olds College","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.01867714687467659,"score_gpt":0.3449665298723358,"score_spread":0.3262893829976592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003496468","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005174501,0.0037243653,0.00043837895,0.0033678692,0.87697685,0.00041531512,0.00008402186,0.00017992785,0.11429584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029547142,0.001459712,0.0001515032,0.0006768722,0.95205486,0.000020322994,0.000059749967,0.00011664053,0.015913209],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98753923,0.0007950474,0.0015662048,0.00069258193,0.00765196,0.0017549943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99347436,0.0014678853,0.001350865,0.00037427782,0.0018212731,0.0015113248],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009206589,0.00067145936,0.0012521573,0.0005589589,0.0025254895,0.0014060184,0.001789734,0.002830403,0.0015503915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066921078,0.000580107,0.00058160233,0.00088713336,0.0008509951,0.0008410708,0.00015782315,0.006214363,0.00020931682],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002717018,0.00011763608,0.000018246696,0.00006301406,0.00021028136,0.0010791981,0.0055008535,0.000001143494,0.00001165267,0.0009209469,0.9889253,0.002880036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011512644,0.00030688808,0.000010131246,0.0004950526,0.00021041831,0.000085991815,0.003582789,0.000002767172,0.000014423031,0.00060622476,0.9928608,0.0006732627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028326703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019308833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09838263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011800909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010010663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007616212","doi":"10.1089/glr.2004.8.243","title":"How Tribal Gaming Commissions Are Evolving","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"National Capital Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Volume (thermodynamics); Political science; Advertising; Law; Computer science; Business; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.04405696667068869,"score_gpt":0.32550036429346524,"score_spread":0.28144339762277654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007616212","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016737456,0.6564146,0.0013739004,0.05501156,0.0011616191,0.0013922411,0.000012364374,0.00048599602,0.28247395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97755325,0.01817612,0.0003452768,0.0018537104,0.0006229277,0.000029360443,0.000002810084,0.000017944752,0.0013985905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851584,0.00016052238,0.00026667392,0.00023753641,0.0004293269,0.00039010405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991361,0.000089841276,0.00022276396,0.00020029744,0.00016118881,0.00018981687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094032125,0.00013796739,0.0004009644,0.000022701326,0.0011302645,0.00025128096,0.00030247963,0.00008327123,0.000078541256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010807001,0.00011734762,0.00013385122,0.00043812656,0.00016449645,0.00048445465,0.000052901923,0.00017338069,0.00005351592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030161657,0.00014253735,0.0007534377,0.0068268543,0.000053208874,0.00008455415,0.0049817893,0.0000043934774,0.00018952944,0.9265499,0.0097427415,0.050668042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001337853,0.000012068052,0.000113208494,0.0123146735,0.000041088522,0.0000036235708,0.00069173356,5.752535e-7,0.000029352483,0.001962232,0.98451304,0.0001845979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008437639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043514934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9758795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016279703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018203894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99816525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009358250","doi":"10.1080/07366981.2014.922010","title":"Appreciating Healthcare Data Privacy Laws in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EDPACS","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Kingdom; Health care; Norm (philosophy); Information privacy; Audit; Business; Perspective (graphical); Privacy law; Political science; Public administration; Law; Privacy policy; Accounting","score_opus":0.06985224562273877,"score_gpt":0.32319463858916797,"score_spread":0.2533423929664292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009358250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9116603,0.00045211718,0.0000654721,0.08233787,0.00044256772,0.0005166535,0.000039189534,0.000038277874,0.004447536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99689156,0.000096295276,0.000014506421,0.0024429238,0.00040720537,0.000008369743,0.000053470932,0.00000771062,0.000077954115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982101,0.0007594414,0.00021326989,0.00017693125,0.00034352264,0.00029679012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982526,0.0011202295,0.00013288693,0.00033128497,0.00008934211,0.00007369195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022705153,0.00008128438,0.00015197194,0.000043431308,0.00080679264,0.00014470093,0.0006345893,0.000040699862,0.000007979178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016938951,0.00004586747,0.000009023699,0.0008155327,0.00021462081,0.00013509303,0.00018530946,0.00021184844,0.0000014590081],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011720516,0.000045650282,0.23537306,0.00025089757,0.000075175085,0.000009661049,0.17333493,0.00070420664,0.0000048663733,0.525419,0.048215758,0.01644958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046136003,0.0000094634925,0.0066517545,0.00007909268,0.000008435162,5.1815556e-7,0.0171936,0.0050092614,0.0000023115142,0.003299253,0.9671693,0.000115681825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9992377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91895354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012222523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067948195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6205278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010941785","doi":"10.1215/03616878-25-1-133","title":"Riding the Bull: Experience with Individual Market Reform in Washington, Kentucky, and Massachusetts","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Download; Citation; Section (typography); Politics; Library science; Political science; Law; Advertising; Business; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.02959835943018209,"score_gpt":0.345061260811961,"score_spread":0.3154629013817789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010941785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8356325,0.0020039114,0.0000027515628,0.062491883,0.000083655825,0.00017026006,0.000009354722,0.000008656571,0.099597044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916058,0.0016068119,0.000042809945,0.0055384547,0.00072751485,0.0000020953325,1.8080375e-7,0.000007013085,0.00046930512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983015,0.00027938577,0.00046312704,0.00009524504,0.00039353964,0.0004672099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919003,0.00016559323,0.0002671557,0.00006989769,0.00006112057,0.00024618403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022724778,0.000089006935,0.00023762809,0.00007998342,0.00087584293,0.00016601826,0.0001726427,0.00006194981,0.00002440424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001216182,0.00005419172,0.000020055299,0.0002105593,0.00046561824,0.00036333088,0.00002115084,0.00026778123,4.973882e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006258071,0.00005606037,0.010696476,0.0001403273,0.000023578415,0.000022734033,0.14946352,0.000002999689,9.07216e-7,0.8315756,0.0013171175,0.0066381297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008732689,0.00045965996,0.025990205,0.0005790133,0.0000145061795,0.00019239156,0.035632525,0.000008134108,0.000010870233,0.023034783,0.9130034,0.00020122791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14146191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007824295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9116863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022618016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006808655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8642552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011710302","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.1.148","title":"The Case for the Federation of Law Societies Rejecting Trinity Western University's Proposed Law Degree Program","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Academic freedom; Sexual orientation; Legal profession; Sociology; Higher education","score_opus":0.054975110701719655,"score_gpt":0.2780333447581323,"score_spread":0.22305823405641265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011710302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7757284,0.010693759,0.00009177481,0.15588471,0.0019359215,0.0026954892,0.000060121743,0.000015392108,0.05289442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915087,0.00026649475,0.00003224899,0.0007170891,0.0006190211,0.000012321309,5.5992115e-7,0.000012497711,0.006831027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833685,0.00047806965,0.00040058378,0.000120177254,0.00015015015,0.0005141783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973564,0.001098905,0.0005758754,0.00013488057,0.00048845174,0.00034548962],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030663041,0.00013922827,0.00033541885,0.000024832374,0.0039185807,0.00079822214,0.00038425016,0.000121396464,0.000019268326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016761429,0.00008325872,0.00017005453,0.00018359903,0.0025313776,0.00059060444,0.000027620965,0.00033756637,0.0000019603085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064485044,0.000019809555,0.00013825313,0.0001410966,0.00018100765,0.000054332595,0.0581349,0.000010677496,0.0000019641475,0.9306027,0.00046371712,0.010187036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022856805,0.0006901785,0.00016960192,0.00038087333,0.0002168927,0.0006154867,0.20489116,0.00019203474,0.000036221565,0.18599471,0.60425025,0.0002768948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41481328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.860672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.744608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037924483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083498884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W201269595","doi":"10.29173/alr160","title":"Recent Regulatory and Legislative Developments of Interest to Energy Lawyers","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Variety (cybernetics); Energy law; Commission; Public administration; Political science; Key (lock); Business; Law; Environmental law; Computer security","score_opus":0.04310559034669739,"score_gpt":0.31845065880103396,"score_spread":0.2753450684543366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W201269595","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030637734,0.037899226,0.000007116448,0.009880768,0.0008101751,0.0005829432,0.0000027561348,0.000021918786,0.9201574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96666306,0.028053569,0.00010861141,0.0027749508,0.00010584262,0.000023981836,0.0000018257251,0.000008920477,0.0022592093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991689,0.000086656444,0.0002647827,0.00017067358,0.00014728447,0.00016175264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993566,0.00012026501,0.00011873666,0.000120135366,0.00013946221,0.0001447621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044679327,0.00008456447,0.00026334764,0.000016954233,0.0001528641,0.000021984408,0.00016351593,0.000056287998,0.00017202992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042137044,0.000070213726,0.00002956178,0.00022503121,0.00018851744,0.00015197105,0.00005618558,0.00006894237,0.00001949022],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026179207,0.000015232446,0.00030706465,0.00023817041,0.00001828469,4.7810863e-7,0.0019334103,1.1408946e-8,0.00012651247,0.92951024,0.0027721957,0.06507579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042580847,0.000013954768,0.00017880318,0.0010339381,0.000013051723,6.3341326e-7,0.000045178353,5.0400377e-8,0.00021145678,0.00063150714,0.9977368,0.00009203894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07893263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4461378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9949646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019227018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000128123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92720085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013505516","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2006.11.1.49","title":"Filling in the Blanks for Litigation Privilege: <i>Blank</i> v <i>Canada (Minister of Justice)</i>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Blank; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Privilege (computing); Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.0961047505531322,"score_gpt":0.3825391091228876,"score_spread":0.2864343585697554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013505516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7388827,0.0063124737,0.02352893,0.19144756,0.009338157,0.002045784,0.000038738362,0.00001556316,0.028390095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99647105,0.00010352428,0.00015184628,0.0015775822,0.0015237851,0.000004744318,5.5270584e-7,0.0000041901462,0.00016273298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790835,0.00010931774,0.0005938371,0.00007277587,0.0011515984,0.00016410727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961708,0.0022066485,0.00063901057,0.00007789756,0.0008697779,0.000035865472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005758525,0.000064131855,0.00013327078,0.00005361189,0.00014256444,0.00008326137,0.0009860741,0.00004023674,0.000016268425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022805945,0.000034039578,0.0000702717,0.00016587715,0.00012197608,0.0004033691,0.000025529354,0.00017445134,4.818927e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056360676,0.0010511414,0.05524099,0.001301346,0.00083063473,0.0004469172,0.24255979,0.003805065,0.017325005,0.344851,0.19937892,0.12757313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019215493,0.0008822672,0.011662915,0.0073009604,0.00035363797,0.00017642073,0.058809638,0.00035492764,0.030333193,0.051673982,0.83595526,0.0005752682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042874657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2433392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6365763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000144578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094745576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96349895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017025070","doi":"","title":"A Taxonomy of Lawyer Regulation: How Contrasting Theories of Regulation Explain the Divergent Regulatory Regimes in Australia, England/Wales, and North America","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Craft; Political science; Common law; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.017734730989431673,"score_gpt":0.23941946009143175,"score_spread":0.22168472910200007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017025070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99256897,0.0016539786,0.002760753,0.0013454258,0.000121695084,0.00026245657,0.0000021411433,0.000009884614,0.0012746955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981698,0.0005104286,0.00003898682,0.000011534417,0.00041974307,0.000008410211,0.0000016294999,0.0000063560615,0.0008331042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981433,0.00043867345,0.00032417764,0.00013110621,0.0003445761,0.00061814015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893785,0.00021883988,0.00052949414,0.000105490406,0.00016033335,0.00004801157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002713441,0.00009789138,0.0002399194,0.000059901384,0.0003428534,0.00004675608,0.0001696346,0.00006328807,0.000015418129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034266626,0.00007143102,0.000052122512,0.00027055352,0.00039501349,0.00028651644,0.000022362978,0.00035079016,4.4110746e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112011294,0.00003967384,0.12056969,0.00004222634,0.00008907768,4.5820195e-7,0.014916498,0.0001737917,0.00028526626,0.82603467,0.000106064275,0.037630558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002606764,0.0007064432,0.21116517,0.00040797147,0.0001360827,0.00003985229,0.06903691,0.00026825364,0.0007354258,0.5881466,0.126164,0.0005864781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003334519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018838983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23788804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016711655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005326407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W202196090","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1299","title":"Canada's Supreme Court and Its National Health Insurance Program: Evaluating the Landmark Chaoulli Decision from a Comparative Perspective","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Landmark; Supreme court; Perspective (graphical); Law; Political science; Section (typography); Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.06415747322803625,"score_gpt":0.3906227387677859,"score_spread":0.32646526553974964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W202196090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40662253,0.019912668,0.00021649871,0.035005696,0.0011321565,0.001499223,0.00027704422,0.00007748231,0.53525674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976812,0.00010949445,0.00041622817,0.00039578663,0.0012693366,0.000015449106,0.0000044981452,0.000007436294,0.00010059955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746776,0.00041002771,0.00032428262,0.00020032909,0.0012744004,0.00032317627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981907,0.00041433368,0.0003194847,0.000051480507,0.00087621954,0.00014779218],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016062495,0.00011969443,0.00023258051,0.000021270991,0.00283934,0.00034600665,0.0002111473,0.000051610103,0.00004648106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002067696,0.00008393548,0.00003918555,0.00017501981,0.0001393231,0.0002712302,0.000027687885,0.00031501523,0.0000032126889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014342154,0.00016671629,0.0073338873,0.000012650068,0.000088218774,0.000017244674,0.014366914,0.00039398042,0.000048606114,0.9613033,0.010802131,0.005322925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031934653,0.0007863517,0.14405167,0.00084674824,0.000039243387,0.00012933195,0.03443149,0.003494253,0.000063470725,0.69589156,0.11621752,0.0008549237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9929381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5910587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059996365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023689773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027819035","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14109","title":"Case Comment on <i>Canada v. Fischbacher</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Volume (thermodynamics); Political science; Library science; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics; World Wide Web; Physics","score_opus":0.020119470051829617,"score_gpt":0.2597711806890595,"score_spread":0.2396517106372299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027819035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29116294,0.021049937,0.0000045941792,0.07424915,0.0022324848,0.0009235704,0.000048658618,0.00006642163,0.6102622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96300864,0.006535165,0.000029361194,0.02988476,0.00028861078,0.0000107217265,0.0000018039568,0.0000067620135,0.00023418604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946713,0.000030224548,0.00017148862,0.00013349384,0.000038223865,0.00015941379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996156,0.000066774766,0.000075697004,0.00010740651,0.000018784212,0.00011574123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004617795,0.00007132611,0.00019286298,0.0000051463744,0.00042949722,0.000062628955,0.0000788711,0.000039938364,0.00007705939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046921934,0.00006529994,0.000023830375,0.000029452118,0.00007848726,0.00009571569,0.000020558473,0.00012201539,0.000010994336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016314682,0.000023252118,0.00033014786,0.0005403597,0.000019731258,0.000059193055,0.00048434577,9.3115807e-7,0.0000029200937,0.9465369,0.033164214,0.018836398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047180623,0.000007898605,0.000007826183,0.000076154116,0.000017523756,0.000029618119,0.000089632566,0.0000017764096,0.0000068775357,0.0003391097,0.9992874,0.00008898696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73358965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93322605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9661232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041557138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014122188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3303389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W202828550","doi":"","title":"The Effectiveness of International Legislative Responses to the Helms-Burton Act","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Political science; Jurisdiction; Law; Politics; Legislature; Democracy; Legislation","score_opus":0.015359214123728433,"score_gpt":0.3293505699516135,"score_spread":0.31399135582788507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W202828550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2815428,0.00013378785,0.000067992296,0.0063836738,0.0003827283,0.00034077017,0.000004472184,0.000023072029,0.71112067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765854,0.00008665505,0.000007988892,0.000113402144,0.00026182688,0.00002353403,3.036691e-7,0.0000031982281,0.022917692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864936,0.0006673062,0.00011593054,0.00009708323,0.00033850895,0.0001318136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979717,0.001728701,0.00003558295,0.00009715667,0.00013276825,0.000034102413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023934643,0.00004858029,0.000076820295,0.000017669054,0.0005503099,0.00009148522,0.00037496412,0.000024467261,0.00036053595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072339387,0.000023630639,0.000041772764,0.00023737249,0.0001740678,0.00014026789,0.000023927938,0.00005160525,0.00007238168],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0048635807,0.00017054574,0.03361214,0.000036600264,0.0002745596,0.0000062830136,0.0765613,0.00021862162,0.0014713797,0.7289116,0.010636015,0.14323741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010636308,0.000050732164,0.030388996,0.000039557526,0.0000040770346,3.60048e-7,0.0021453626,0.000004706008,0.0013382159,0.0024127355,0.96345145,0.00005744982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019653743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006675109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9528154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042659798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001384309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98687446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032725796","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2265.2012.00748_26.x","title":"A Second Appeal: A Consideration of Freedom and Social Justice. By Daphne M.Rolle. Pp. vi, 31, Lanham, MD, University Press of America, 2010, $15.99.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Heythrop Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Calgary Laboratory Services","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Economic Justice; Social justice; Citation; Sociology; Law; Library science; Theology; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.02330735780298176,"score_gpt":0.2683693989717078,"score_spread":0.24506204116872604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032725796","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89592505,0.022600606,0.00159415,0.0067963134,0.0025828045,0.00067979004,0.00020834821,0.000052207477,0.06956074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99638474,0.0014162259,0.0000915777,0.00007604079,0.0009448518,5.3012e-7,0.0000015067593,0.0000071094037,0.0010774276],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987263,0.00033289954,0.0002624759,0.000082662795,0.00034019168,0.00025544257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989767,0.00015965852,0.0004891104,0.000069535046,0.00019850174,0.00010650981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008805412,0.00008938735,0.00026869326,0.000028563447,0.0009852906,0.000057833902,0.00016746309,0.000086840104,0.00018804091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008758945,0.000068482186,0.00006318607,0.00013200442,0.0007561162,0.00044612252,0.00005094878,0.00021104512,0.000003393629],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002052973,0.00022730412,0.0021249475,0.00020816858,0.00021032356,0.0000061855917,0.057783656,0.000015696623,0.0056189876,0.015762059,0.9164315,0.0014058783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016996614,0.00020766063,0.001852037,0.00010597191,0.00041348118,0.00006107667,0.0668587,0.00008114999,0.00084717915,0.00093815284,0.92660606,0.0003288798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073242593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004965814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10045969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044779932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018110576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99928606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W203816426","doi":"","title":"Must There Be Uniform Standards for Jurisdiction in a Federation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Russian federation; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.01342975026102831,"score_gpt":0.3063085427951787,"score_spread":0.2928787925341504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W203816426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57503504,0.0120581575,0.103065796,0.012919437,0.002356928,0.001920158,0.000025184852,0.00015089507,0.2924684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959699,0.0018825406,0.000030083564,0.000067627036,0.0004742292,0.0000136751405,0.000001255612,0.000009902771,0.0015507982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807125,0.00013246108,0.0002147118,0.0001078527,0.00037261733,0.0011010797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995366,0.000039573362,0.00011321389,0.000040934407,0.00021607154,0.000053662247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049890024,0.00007325141,0.00011575996,0.00006871682,0.00088241266,0.00016802983,0.000089364235,0.000092399605,0.000033136937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003357406,0.000064725624,0.00005663581,0.00021960402,0.00003687176,0.00038449283,0.000002962673,0.00049869204,0.0000017217466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037736943,0.000035845696,0.0009400506,0.000007766304,0.00002042035,6.9963505e-7,0.0030170649,0.000023073613,0.0000375313,0.986818,0.0002980189,0.008763757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009365014,0.0003079075,0.00011831115,0.00003660211,0.000014390641,0.000019288198,0.032508582,0.000021550291,0.0001025773,0.5193775,0.44639587,0.00016086275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023820526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20196159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4674405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020296331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075644357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043803687","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwt038","title":"United States v Windsor: (Docket no 12-307): Supreme Court of the United States: Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan JJ; Roberts CJ, dissenting; Scalia and Thomas JJ dissenting, joined by Roberts CJ as to part I; Alito J dissenting, joined by Thomas J as to parts II and III: 26 June 2013","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Dissenting opinion; Supreme court; Law; Substantive due process; Federalism; Political science; Due Process Clause; State (computer science); Jurisdiction; Appeal; Politics","score_opus":0.008336688054690365,"score_gpt":0.2561875288732041,"score_spread":0.24785084081851375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043803687","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97655004,0.002482768,0.00004244867,0.01636025,0.0006477614,0.0011031489,0.00003628097,0.000056716395,0.0027206137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97883254,0.009512075,0.00008828139,0.0013189347,0.00039952886,0.000023795437,0.00006422623,0.00007539466,0.009685205],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957712,0.0004411389,0.001347188,0.0005830841,0.0009748914,0.00088244985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964499,0.00031395422,0.0011255415,0.0003024102,0.00079149014,0.0010167187],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013418323,0.000544481,0.000919633,0.0002753726,0.0017014391,0.0008125437,0.0003708322,0.0002796584,0.000054274005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039332945,0.00038043354,0.0001507607,0.0007201714,0.0006518718,0.00081363367,0.00035980533,0.00036742986,0.000003543904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008500562,0.00081223744,0.06548819,0.0006578579,0.0005601708,0.00006406291,0.028511865,0.00006787302,0.02004672,0.0074324193,0.8746468,0.0008617839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016632831,0.00075360265,0.0020787604,0.0015843537,0.00021328857,0.000089904854,0.0035092288,0.00017471207,0.0031273847,0.0031421853,0.9829961,0.0006671693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07509507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004923749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10834936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005260828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010645123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048708683","doi":"10.1017/s1537592704470376","title":"Same-Sex Marriage and the Constitution","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Politics; Law; Supreme court; Legitimacy; Political science; State (computer science); Sociology","score_opus":0.013846825684301596,"score_gpt":0.2967608833149278,"score_spread":0.28291405763062616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048708683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10721716,0.0014761399,0.0002893025,0.017912362,0.00027031288,0.00033716953,0.000011737363,0.000080870996,0.87240493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973639,0.00027411972,0.00003731723,0.0005491153,0.0006440026,0.0000069805146,3.0129146e-7,0.0000035416447,0.0011207119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992817,0.00008847945,0.00008706138,0.00013615767,0.00020053552,0.00020603917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995914,0.00013860122,0.00003866281,0.00008403008,0.00007109651,0.000076217104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034508077,0.000064517815,0.00010766233,0.000027301672,0.0007588962,0.00010484426,0.00008949028,0.000048160022,0.000022627168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054965337,0.000044319735,0.00003262936,0.0000950338,0.0016614017,0.0000977094,0.00001598445,0.0000993814,0.00002548265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074274335,0.000019996287,0.00007146924,0.0000035045205,0.0000080295695,0.0000014620955,0.06580924,0.000005081806,0.00000327093,0.9339384,0.000053853233,0.000078262034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015774752,0.000063528576,0.000905905,0.00004648483,0.000025344767,0.0000041480102,0.28695932,0.0000040966347,0.00010332781,0.64118016,0.06895256,0.00017767199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025532592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069252634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89014673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017865213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002125021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9809565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051089205","doi":"10.5195/jlc.2010.1","title":"Protecting a Client’s Confidences: Recent Developments in Privileged Communication Between Attorneys and Accountants","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Commerce","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"PricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Waiver; Transactional leadership; Order (exchange); Representation (politics); Political science; Business; Law; Jurisprudence; Public relations; Internet privacy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04541260549783039,"score_gpt":0.3410863356233887,"score_spread":0.2956737301255583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051089205","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97524047,0.00040581884,0.00001344243,0.0020737492,0.00014804739,0.00016235154,8.435356e-7,0.0000054849993,0.0219498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998629,0.0006715782,0.0002731074,0.0002481023,0.00014525387,0.0000027505528,2.8394945e-7,0.00000386994,0.00002607361],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989756,0.00021097093,0.000356557,0.0000737135,0.00024304824,0.00014014482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913794,0.00021404194,0.00031584894,0.00006366441,0.00017318288,0.000095332885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023172696,0.00006197215,0.00018774671,0.000043100616,0.00049029087,0.00013911356,0.000190387,0.00008245972,0.000011599675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026402657,0.000051811585,0.000013873507,0.00012268458,0.00017783111,0.00042840344,0.00005163665,0.00044823685,8.341937e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057870817,0.00010441237,0.813305,0.00007683149,0.000047053552,0.000007911415,0.04744396,2.9776635e-7,0.0008199724,0.061476164,0.00013828774,0.07652222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011707108,0.000121304576,0.34367213,0.0007086897,0.00002871681,0.000026721737,0.010099402,0.0000028324234,0.0003142307,0.0074894573,0.6360982,0.0002676224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063603697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022376608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6359599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031147174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014720914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W206020881","doi":"","title":"Gender and the Profession: The No-Problem Problem","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Honor; Pleasure; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Representation (politics); Lesbian; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.026315645169295365,"score_gpt":0.2723184401503823,"score_spread":0.24600279498108696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W206020881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077315364,0.0063535166,0.000021318941,0.026354844,0.0006242228,0.0012735468,0.000003821565,0.00014466952,0.95749253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748369,0.00038670958,0.00014239065,0.002414864,0.0013731382,0.00013025424,6.141246e-7,0.000015784728,0.02069937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803334,0.00048538775,0.00027235725,0.00026636873,0.0005288559,0.00041366587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905396,0.00023524728,0.000135252,0.00026122562,0.0001578031,0.00015649885],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015469027,0.00014256536,0.00020297259,0.000014184026,0.0024172578,0.0003842592,0.00045175062,0.0001245857,0.0010209755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018549869,0.0000706789,0.00006971028,0.00028394576,0.00086043746,0.00038117068,0.00011127399,0.00035709832,0.00067855755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020345256,0.000032843254,0.00091890665,0.00005180939,0.000027859604,0.0000030672863,0.011679807,0.0000017062389,0.00002190396,0.9504141,0.03552972,0.0012978847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006492805,0.000021485343,0.00022149755,0.000064286774,0.00002313277,0.0000030104138,0.003723226,0.000030736133,0.000014760669,0.036049213,0.95903414,0.00016521025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012259112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005834131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9671053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038163766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007951545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064054238","doi":"10.1215/03616878-26-3-658","title":"The Making and Meaning of Hospital Policy in the United States and Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Meaning (existential); Citation; Politics; Download; Library science; Political science; Law; Sociology; Public administration; Psychology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02626146355776272,"score_gpt":0.3606816588355035,"score_spread":0.3344201952777408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064054238","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83886087,0.002228038,0.000003466762,0.14953384,0.00009207905,0.0001101148,0.0000080973105,0.0000019040039,0.009161575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879312,0.0043278774,0.000007810129,0.0070503685,0.00064667995,4.6861985e-7,2.0943276e-7,0.000003671724,0.00003170707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986734,0.00028960334,0.0003930175,0.000047816233,0.00025854606,0.00033762975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989322,0.0004877092,0.00033435278,0.000043062784,0.00009869076,0.000103994214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014911812,0.000059682618,0.00017266611,0.00008583609,0.00083167583,0.000088907094,0.00010877771,0.000031276722,3.9618928e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046681348,0.000035253775,0.000012784681,0.0002446773,0.00034614664,0.00010245421,0.000020489002,0.00015944587,1.6556772e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046241853,0.000009502213,0.006448968,0.00004872406,0.0000076750775,0.0000055971786,0.030972969,0.000003578818,2.1975069e-7,0.96152294,0.00036704438,0.0006081447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045093667,0.00034094165,0.014391679,0.00028759908,0.000010423536,0.000071746435,0.070728675,0.000029274113,0.0000018944689,0.12525532,0.7883193,0.00011222469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98851204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8728389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83626765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012448564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016251404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63966626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066751805","doi":"10.1089/glr.2005.9.10","title":"Games of Skill and Chance in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Systems, Applications & Products in Data Processing (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Volume (thermodynamics); Management; Sociology; Humanities; Economics; Computer science; Art; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.013278266526361444,"score_gpt":0.28090421449630576,"score_spread":0.2676259479699443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066751805","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07282137,0.80915713,0.000005334641,0.006566206,0.0001613427,0.0004305422,0.0000042132488,0.000014135735,0.11083975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94347894,0.055244725,0.000037075384,0.0010222497,0.00008028055,0.000005802127,1.958911e-7,0.0000023069458,0.00012840779],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994249,0.000051265863,0.00017733,0.00008126344,0.00014376189,0.00012152194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997657,0.000041617765,0.00007342658,0.000052035888,0.000030550033,0.00003665879],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003756633,0.000039765935,0.00019422293,0.0000067179317,0.000052981082,0.0000064057067,0.00007174403,0.000014510911,0.000034341017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000107429965,0.00003460862,0.000012242131,0.00013942226,0.00005518867,0.00009324899,0.000012103119,0.000035600326,0.000001904527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002333714,0.00003646141,0.010735286,0.008213366,0.000013997265,0.000010205127,0.00560232,0.0000029933,0.00003880474,0.41822043,0.0037992564,0.5533245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003707229,0.0000031400555,0.0009796218,0.0031087662,0.000004689185,4.4446728e-7,0.00013511305,0.0000013596214,0.00003330143,0.0001259933,0.9955145,0.00005596132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98279536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99661165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99171525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008300804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031832742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14112985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076488515","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.25.1.128","title":"“I Wish the Supreme Court Thought More Like Dianne”: A Comment on <i>Krangle v Brisco</i>","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Wish; Political science; Art; Ethnology; Sociology; Literature","score_opus":0.020587774562238485,"score_gpt":0.2452920658503334,"score_spread":0.2247042912880949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076488515","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18125315,0.01940836,0.000011314075,0.74616104,0.0029204537,0.00066809467,0.000066768596,0.0000084753465,0.049502343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92055804,0.0010303376,0.0000101168125,0.055509638,0.0020524124,0.000032573542,0.0000016312144,0.000030790976,0.02077448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971382,0.0006495401,0.00060438644,0.0002166912,0.0003878929,0.0010033106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971424,0.0005541542,0.00049454474,0.0002881313,0.00028928608,0.0012315316],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027468272,0.00027398005,0.00061779894,0.0000782421,0.0013014106,0.00082851684,0.00081665284,0.00017369982,0.0004741296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016971483,0.0001755544,0.00022168757,0.00039148252,0.0020091513,0.00059931347,0.000043559146,0.0007328069,0.000088941735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006659957,0.000067685105,0.00085529214,0.00011960411,0.00031717113,0.00012844033,0.14208242,0.00004822359,0.0000025835616,0.5627103,0.28964108,0.0039606164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001071333,0.0002352299,0.00045232158,0.00048018247,0.0000721802,0.00012891281,0.024885334,0.000034966055,0.000005683622,0.055313338,0.91708314,0.00023737446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.313484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29701865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7393049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006897146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009902888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076627798","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.2004.16325","title":"From the Editor-in-Chief: What Do Nursing and the Law Have in Common: Retention","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Nursing leadership","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nursing; Psychology; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.06740083358692409,"score_gpt":0.31784290197605003,"score_spread":0.25044206838912597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076627798","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004209211,0.02912351,0.0000070414667,0.053795725,0.90363514,0.0007212434,0.000013659781,0.00005337047,0.01222937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31542966,0.00058410177,0.000006678158,0.0001873096,0.6835494,0.000018798213,0.000031052037,0.000030064939,0.00016293071],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958133,0.0012040143,0.00050876325,0.0005387806,0.0012833911,0.0006517254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965232,0.002632132,0.00032026754,0.00032196386,0.000113450784,0.00008900316],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027930203,0.0003007167,0.0005880684,0.00007891376,0.00097637123,0.0016972618,0.0006276231,0.0011269959,0.000012670238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072879746,0.0002076438,0.00012432753,0.0003375524,0.0031573365,0.0007911486,0.00001842996,0.0017641209,0.000009158745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002801471,0.00009223055,0.0000943381,0.00007376398,0.000020151587,0.000010532559,0.2916171,0.000007453746,0.0000015122018,0.016344253,0.6790296,0.0124289105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00186514,0.000038258364,0.00013005605,0.024222484,0.00009005256,5.994706e-7,0.34335148,0.0000061716605,0.0000032623789,0.12460948,0.5052897,0.00039334907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10076291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06399421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31500873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010204847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053101673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078718453","doi":"10.5172/jfs.327.13.2.133","title":"Redefining marriage or deconstructing society: A Canadian case study","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Studies","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Sociology; Legalization; Existentialism; Law; Economic Justice; Gender studies; Political science; Criminology","score_opus":0.16065818865534542,"score_gpt":0.42514830876905424,"score_spread":0.2644901201137088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078718453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97814,0.0045033004,0.000023458422,0.00043755487,0.0013424428,0.0001582051,0.0000015596172,0.000014439815,0.015379065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971468,0.0003506575,0.0006371076,0.0003277293,0.0012824838,0.0000013118224,2.5361889e-8,0.000009391765,0.00024453315],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982695,0.00010608177,0.00062810676,0.0001204043,0.00044263026,0.00043329463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807286,0.00052263134,0.00045156296,0.000066662455,0.00061801705,0.0002682763],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004794065,0.000115540046,0.00039091078,0.00013829497,0.0016312848,0.00010585747,0.00016079986,0.000065510074,0.000011497589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013040067,0.00008432162,0.00012538765,0.0004525659,0.00019945404,0.00030119624,0.000036173184,0.00024822066,0.0000025824936],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008906021,0.00012716278,0.24096917,0.000074018935,0.001461102,0.032674473,0.6611908,0.000007267034,0.00006602513,0.000781336,0.016184604,0.04637499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041007932,0.0002112268,0.0026967612,0.0001005985,0.00007429128,0.000774389,0.97589296,5.0912115e-7,0.0000041096973,0.00018302108,0.019532315,0.00011974494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38969392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8486859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.458992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003930815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011730933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W208274694","doi":"","title":"The Act of God Defense: Why Hurricane Katrina & Noah's Flood Don't Qualify","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œReview of litigation","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Storm surge; Storm; Hurricane katrina; Tropical cyclone; Flood myth; Atlantic hurricane; History; Natural disaster; Oceanography; Archaeology; Geology","score_opus":0.01908386068942609,"score_gpt":0.3253921845488619,"score_spread":0.3063083238594358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W208274694","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16821289,0.4161416,0.001654901,0.04785719,0.0022093384,0.004455524,0.000056576653,0.00017690907,0.35923508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98737806,0.011172578,0.000034944816,0.0006475805,0.00042761926,0.000013153872,0.00000440943,0.0000075471257,0.0003141318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979757,0.00037042177,0.0006341681,0.0001302832,0.0006462637,0.00024317764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981029,0.0005996893,0.000585225,0.00024164174,0.00040453082,0.00006600858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005319046,0.000094201896,0.00027063134,0.000025287078,0.0004626605,0.00003313792,0.0003719033,0.000065422595,0.000068433554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005679308,0.00005562096,0.00013627874,0.000626034,0.00036188745,0.00015637248,0.000028549397,0.00011091315,0.000016483777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079259335,0.00029764185,0.009006098,0.011549632,0.00021303611,0.000005454329,0.02827355,0.0000041768735,0.0013041234,0.608566,0.03676424,0.3039368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015965212,0.00008011703,0.0029946123,0.0022066073,0.00008471004,0.0000020194009,0.0033759372,0.0000019970482,0.0006515836,0.0061411904,0.98416454,0.00013703085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010165347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070535354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9474003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047621703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020880438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99642605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084328457","doi":"10.1353/rah.2013.0024","title":"Rethinking Legal Liberalism: The Sexual Freedom Doctrine that Never Was","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reviews in American History","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Liberalism; Doctrine; Civil liberties; Sociology; Economic Justice; Injustice; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.05658699082711832,"score_gpt":0.297354613784197,"score_spread":0.24076762295707865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084328457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07721092,0.24790563,0.00010889692,0.026501978,0.0049234703,0.0038720355,0.0000037647044,0.00033841794,0.6391349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92568713,0.01664735,0.00063969014,0.010889649,0.002423481,0.00037648826,0.0000034174282,0.000045406265,0.04328736],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765176,0.0007897716,0.0004215986,0.00029720436,0.00043565882,0.00040403864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989073,0.00018355266,0.0003953862,0.00033580084,0.00006396734,0.00011395249],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016130508,0.00016544218,0.00051018095,0.00006907224,0.0003097189,0.00007227629,0.00055644306,0.000060667353,0.0008492581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040287798,0.000113268645,0.00009804391,0.0003686352,0.001072212,0.0007051788,0.0000646198,0.0003754272,0.00036958166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074020595,0.00007987424,0.005534614,0.00014906397,0.00002161391,0.000016039305,0.07639769,0.000005501933,0.00009645052,0.031670667,0.66069525,0.22532582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006720923,0.000032625845,0.0009719502,0.000097109565,0.000009762896,0.0000015061042,0.0013364314,0.0000056331214,9.0173984e-7,0.00042259213,0.99689686,0.00015741414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31233475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018040303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84847623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008771693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003142341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087100822","doi":"10.5663/aps.v3i1&amp;2.21704","title":"Case Commentary: Manitoba Métis Federation v. Canada and Manitoba","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Political science; Genealogy; Library science; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.17026464547054096,"score_gpt":0.4944043371446504,"score_spread":0.3241396916741094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087100822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97601795,0.0035174557,0.0001478324,0.0022636163,0.0011869558,0.00051123626,0.0000342983,0.0000308922,0.016289743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99542964,0.0016149144,0.000041114505,0.00187497,0.00086299697,0.000020110527,0.0000065774416,0.000023800716,0.00012590653],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741024,0.0005274915,0.0005746715,0.00031662252,0.0007579644,0.0004130211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982468,0.0003621951,0.00053807884,0.00020158282,0.00029940048,0.00035194587],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018057275,0.00021055616,0.0004896119,0.00017833432,0.0018667396,0.0025158124,0.0009471073,0.00009441361,0.001159616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003620259,0.00019988911,0.00005574983,0.00045341242,0.00017207739,0.0021544197,0.00036601783,0.00024139589,0.0000039448946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006237084,0.000116637595,0.6317861,0.00013821776,0.00013859455,0.00045890873,0.00140281,0.000019358924,0.0013497892,0.0020650919,0.32170838,0.040753704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011462558,0.000035868936,0.26155397,0.0005752968,0.00017827762,0.00027179133,0.011494731,0.00009999106,0.0029330002,0.015193733,0.70529896,0.0012181471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99451214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38359055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003124416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040606962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W209576043","doi":"","title":"U.S. ruling ignores Canadian Internet users’ privacy rights","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; The Internet; Business; Privacy rights; Computer security; Information privacy; Computer science; Political science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.0345170458778531,"score_gpt":0.27525231177220744,"score_spread":0.24073526589435434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W209576043","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43096113,0.00012405255,0.000039569164,0.0012768866,0.00035127322,0.000116217016,0.0000014640793,0.000084016785,0.5670454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981896,0.000022472192,0.00010761788,0.00038196237,0.00051529374,0.00000434239,0.0000016136221,0.0000056835966,0.017065013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990745,0.00004712647,0.00013952832,0.0001552628,0.00023319828,0.00035036312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943614,0.00003614394,0.00003490418,0.000087922745,0.00008115755,0.00032375404],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018787206,0.00007269953,0.00011122972,0.000074440286,0.00081336795,0.00007693317,0.00026296143,0.00007988043,0.0009990511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008946152,0.00005976244,0.000038044487,0.000207163,0.00015721117,0.00028917447,0.000019085635,0.00007700168,0.0003206922],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012028991,0.000064104606,0.16517633,0.000025487252,0.000066038076,0.0002618552,0.18985796,0.000007756848,0.000035894285,0.39188376,0.25044397,0.0021648398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008054629,0.000013121721,0.0037375167,0.000017118642,0.0000030278188,0.000002954813,0.0009153997,0.000009034433,0.00018395516,0.0029599592,0.9919387,0.00013866926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9880716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98256505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7414947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013377419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055572274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095969229","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1029735","title":"The Problem of Official Discretion in Anti-Terrorism Law: Comment on Khawajah","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Terrorism; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.009732085653718662,"score_gpt":0.29073789709406467,"score_spread":0.28100581144034603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095969229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7806734,0.0050190003,0.010091557,0.046768744,0.001303891,0.0012209039,0.0000035425685,0.00006493164,0.15485406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99788636,0.0010915061,0.000008118694,0.00018926294,0.0005240657,0.000002166299,4.511793e-7,0.000007726173,0.00029034962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974968,0.00017046618,0.00038683548,0.000101995174,0.0004852238,0.0013586837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994308,0.00012348103,0.00023982865,0.000066629524,0.000083364845,0.000055905937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071059167,0.000082268125,0.0001474796,0.00005787899,0.00074184046,0.0000615395,0.00026007436,0.00007857636,0.00000701046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036551268,0.00005612949,0.00006570349,0.00024342023,0.00016819064,0.00014127602,0.000012807033,0.00086410687,0.000005373595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071615534,0.00008647153,0.0009979048,0.0000041360054,0.000019224855,0.0000018350901,0.0026981607,0.00002161468,0.000060670416,0.97840536,0.00007416017,0.01755882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011672263,0.000982375,0.0025716065,0.00022101082,0.000025052535,0.00001846301,0.055440877,0.000013035878,0.00060883345,0.63869834,0.29993647,0.0003167071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018890353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20477395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33970705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000720136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010376686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98764294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099437096","doi":"","title":"Same-Sex Marriage in Canada: Contributions from the Courts, the Executive, and Parliament","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Law; Executive order; Executive power; Politics","score_opus":0.006973245466474039,"score_gpt":0.24459392306279873,"score_spread":0.2376206775963247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099437096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7723753,0.048001472,0.00048700356,0.16759452,0.0005128257,0.0005999223,0.000058961425,0.000019602356,0.010350418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99099326,0.0064515793,0.0000025853944,0.00080098974,0.00096386386,0.000008043586,0.0000010445146,0.0000049550317,0.00077370304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790525,0.0002832808,0.00021102879,0.000109451816,0.00035415238,0.001136822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993892,0.00028280797,0.00011455467,0.00007918516,0.0000617563,0.00007254893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002146167,0.00008074622,0.0001303815,0.00001307873,0.0010483451,0.00012090849,0.00027933402,0.00003959903,0.000043000924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019122078,0.00004606609,0.000029162818,0.0001239169,0.00012406941,0.00013962419,0.000025385605,0.000911379,0.0000034111606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005165338,0.000066792985,0.067516945,0.0000022379904,0.00023140573,0.000010757728,0.017416244,0.0000766173,0.000046041678,0.8454409,0.01677806,0.052362297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007863837,0.000045120698,0.015534653,0.000043673324,0.00004242337,0.000023174232,0.11070372,0.000054110347,0.000026106103,0.20452048,0.66801375,0.0002063964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9806528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99925965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6512357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029820367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011900602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W210520605","doi":"","title":"John Marshall Globalized1","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Constitutionality; Constitutionalism; Political science; Separation of powers; Democracy; Politics; Limited government; Impeachment; Sociology","score_opus":0.018162318802768918,"score_gpt":0.2881237672120543,"score_spread":0.2699614484092854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W210520605","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79936945,0.00016310622,0.000013463068,0.09600573,0.00019069458,0.00036584114,0.00000925022,0.00014375795,0.103738695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99583346,0.00019429464,0.00065314444,0.0022907285,0.00088483037,0.000014925197,2.493361e-7,0.000016863276,0.000111528774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812925,0.000016138667,0.0003102249,0.00029081386,0.00082823774,0.00042534634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882585,0.000042927346,0.0004859579,0.00010300176,0.0003656695,0.00017662036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005775827,0.00015742643,0.00036394614,0.000015073112,0.0006248628,0.000080927086,0.00085196184,0.000095961455,0.000020466534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038894548,0.00011381392,0.00042409715,0.0011757651,0.0021802112,0.0002547289,0.00019787833,0.00027247766,0.000011108968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054032924,0.00023604442,0.008271266,0.000104340696,0.0001171167,5.753661e-7,0.0072745103,0.0000074391896,0.0037643078,0.9759709,0.0029107318,0.0012887142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056494866,0.00014493814,0.0055342144,0.00014402487,0.00006511522,0.0000043764253,0.004536263,0.0000036066967,0.001340697,0.9473114,0.040001478,0.00034895158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011622091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006598082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19646397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023123328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020495123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107990315","doi":"","title":"Expanding the Role of Culture in British Columbia's Adoption Scheme","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Government (linguistics); Cultural heritage; Public relations; Perspective (graphical); Ambiguity; Political science; Best interests; Public administration; Law; Business; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.026866553479299244,"score_gpt":0.32071451691811753,"score_spread":0.2938479634388183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107990315","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02780784,0.59643024,0.000002446748,0.00027690883,0.00025987608,0.00068246323,0.000013212329,0.000021086626,0.37450594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91935533,0.08023755,0.000010495282,0.00016381755,0.00014040971,0.000019074354,0.0000062665963,0.0000043328637,0.000062729705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989555,0.000085665255,0.00035477392,0.00011587934,0.00032860698,0.00015958528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944216,0.000012373305,0.00021713843,0.000091976726,0.00016135458,0.00007497322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001159109,0.000056449087,0.0002871496,0.0000060657117,0.00016710907,0.000067128385,0.00015208194,0.00005095399,0.000012560306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005515533,0.000048377777,0.000055883807,0.00021359233,0.00028327617,0.00025928282,0.000041171206,0.00010968719,0.0000015901165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048015904,0.000113859205,0.0051559657,0.005541357,0.000014479164,8.28775e-7,0.0040826746,6.7490504e-8,0.000021573314,0.9000737,0.0010220172,0.08396866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015364938,0.00003297098,0.00017831591,0.008881816,0.000013831237,0.0000015417379,0.0020700006,7.1158263e-7,0.000017778073,0.004672443,0.9839008,0.00007617483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2905192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35653958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98287874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059735627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007769462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7142053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109825357","doi":"10.1002/j.1939-4640.2004.tb03151.x","title":"Who's Your Daddy?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Andrology","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University College of the North","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Child support; Law; Complaint; Psychology; Criminology; Political science","score_opus":0.025783801724154436,"score_gpt":0.33151859761338776,"score_spread":0.3057347958892333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109825357","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85700357,0.0017484948,0.0007059722,0.019249571,0.0015685181,0.000067327026,9.76112e-7,0.000015430069,0.11964014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974136,0.00022811857,0.00009476287,0.00050442346,0.0013696969,2.7264036e-7,6.583954e-8,0.0000034642735,0.0003855956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992815,0.00006272905,0.00023223461,0.000051074458,0.00020041637,0.00017200707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994364,0.000030916166,0.0002204159,0.000038249498,0.00017406433,0.000099960846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006030038,0.00004290953,0.00018208296,0.00006269512,0.0001805523,0.00003060663,0.00016475773,0.00009187564,0.00009990503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019866404,0.000033609955,0.00006561627,0.00012565654,0.00012797375,0.0002138445,0.000010923386,0.0001431723,0.000020653746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006964032,0.0007740696,0.05292925,0.00009491217,0.00043953906,0.0016362328,0.11490881,0.0010700038,0.0038227336,0.75320053,0.038609114,0.03181842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015193889,0.000868928,0.0051162215,0.00006613863,0.000041021296,0.0002459205,0.0025077343,9.796939e-7,0.00036571096,0.09972976,0.8893847,0.00015351405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001558517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067847274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85077554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046154997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036172356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2356022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111481304","doi":"","title":"St. John's University School of Law - 2013 An Introduction to the Symposium","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology; Engineering physics; Engineering","score_opus":0.01072183227894385,"score_gpt":0.2457794590543913,"score_spread":0.23505762677544745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111481304","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36252323,0.00027515634,0.0009555981,0.109012835,0.0042237635,0.0015239225,0.00006446723,0.0004111093,0.5210099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901078,0.000030593466,0.00014007562,0.0008439559,0.004101372,0.0000036823908,0.0000051917045,0.00001141783,0.0047559286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984103,0.0003485098,0.0001914728,0.00031381543,0.0004339372,0.0003020091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988254,0.000058637812,0.00012278232,0.00038982855,0.00026238593,0.0003409867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012143793,0.00011247141,0.0001988025,0.000039531216,0.0009781119,0.00013158964,0.00053795154,0.00011146947,0.0005292063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001986249,0.00009304811,0.00006247926,0.00035936755,0.00028713883,0.0007911351,0.00007694042,0.0001986126,0.00038904016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000362674,0.00005351436,0.00059397257,0.00002125854,0.000017438048,9.290388e-7,0.0014776291,0.00016067979,0.0011130478,0.94731647,0.048987195,0.00022159616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001518093,0.00010630288,0.00035469298,0.000016958873,0.000019215717,4.7695704e-7,0.001375835,0.000007769154,0.00043782243,0.0027525942,0.9946437,0.00013285835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19382717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15876018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9456565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011852844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001393835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8565903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112888221","doi":"","title":"Oil and Freshwater Don't Mix: Transnational Regulation of Drilling in the Great Lakes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College environmental affairs law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oil drilling; Jurisdiction; Drilling; Shore; Oil reserves; Oil pollution; Oil spill; Fossil fuel; Environmental planning; Environmental protection; Business; Natural resource economics; Environmental science; Petroleum; Law; Oceanography; Political science; Engineering; Geology; Economics; Waste management","score_opus":0.010407559926024797,"score_gpt":0.23930098447593456,"score_spread":0.22889342454990977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112888221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6640556,0.046021625,0.000010685415,0.038999047,0.0006856657,0.0012390099,0.00039470303,0.000053820557,0.24853984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935255,0.005421204,0.00008198418,0.00024195496,0.00009504018,0.000036630714,0.000015019687,0.0000072490357,0.0005754245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987954,0.0001658237,0.00030097686,0.00017267824,0.00041599717,0.00014916252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996351,0.000097668206,0.00010390843,0.00011148905,0.000007692384,0.000044134747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008863392,0.00010063422,0.00021588561,0.000021553045,0.00027003168,0.000021476497,0.00015508865,0.000075429634,0.00047559134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021122976,0.00007138879,0.00005952132,0.00013463663,0.00041787923,0.00023519146,0.000017173266,0.00012347777,0.0000049253995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001608546,0.00014312913,0.0035807616,0.00087290053,0.000015910766,0.000006325464,0.0036706445,0.000002888045,0.0044002156,0.9785491,0.00070337777,0.0080386605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023754229,0.00002553603,0.0019967018,0.00035652588,0.000030503184,0.000006444286,0.0012353156,0.000013497689,0.0001811848,0.0012339874,0.99454474,0.00013804485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011033316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052370083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99384135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031073378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025055777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9649217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126710748","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.2002.19159","title":"Pont du Gard Forum, \"Let's Get Real\" - The Nether Side Revealed","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Nursing leadership","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Sciences Centre; Sunnybrook Health Science Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.3072337490193521,"score_gpt":0.37339169103675257,"score_spread":0.0661579420174005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126710748","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[6.972225e-7,0.73404497,0.000009986649,0.012282246,0.0012611729,0.0008397223,0.0000065859235,0.00015237095,0.25140226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001172767,0.97581685,0.000023459754,0.0006550004,0.005297256,0.00007647693,0.000012062119,0.0000999356,0.01684618],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954184,0.0014144254,0.00068119325,0.0005675276,0.00084393437,0.0010744933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784553,0.0007149831,0.00058677176,0.00050536357,0.00012799012,0.00021933475],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016857306,0.0004737107,0.0013231509,0.00011844254,0.0013207046,0.00042534954,0.0009928256,0.0007434377,0.00024193597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059925957,0.00032315156,0.0005905421,0.00067996787,0.0008571466,0.00021612282,0.000024156903,0.0008354847,0.000470637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004351036,0.000046305486,0.000008669945,0.0020537542,0.000059825943,0.000015792175,0.01554522,2.8922946e-7,5.0315823e-8,0.005774072,0.06392282,0.91256887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008802007,0.00003151281,0.0000058611695,0.017479043,0.00036357332,0.000014080461,0.010883912,8.551815e-7,5.670645e-8,0.00086291664,0.9698639,0.000406282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072495295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91216254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064524333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055687735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128765631","doi":"","title":"Stumbling Toward Total Information Awareness: The Security of Canada Information Sharing Act","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Information sharing; Information security; Business; Information security management; Internet privacy; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Security information and event management; Cloud computing security; World Wide Web; Law; Cloud computing","score_opus":0.017644946319456543,"score_gpt":0.269815469725017,"score_spread":0.25217052340556045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128765631","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96041924,0.00089907704,0.0024835174,0.003467921,0.00104448,0.00026868665,0.000005993111,0.000031634936,0.031379465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999357,0.00018067966,0.0000027709286,0.00007797815,0.0003180995,0.000002589041,0.0000030196547,0.0000024601643,0.00005541884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799603,0.00006751328,0.0003616507,0.000040809136,0.0006972221,0.00083676557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999007,0.000031704592,0.00035393634,0.00006682009,0.0004460328,0.00009450771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035231186,0.00006975878,0.00011702376,0.000052105497,0.0005364754,0.00018811645,0.00030130259,0.000050599876,0.00000646817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053134083,0.000050795985,0.000037139485,0.0002682352,0.00004148638,0.0026077374,0.00003686837,0.000572703,0.000003514957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013472559,0.000034684963,0.025881803,0.00009644086,0.00020218953,0.0000010388992,0.20241165,0.002151175,0.000007025748,0.7358771,0.00258548,0.030616704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013153249,0.00026642546,0.002289022,0.00012719611,0.000056074343,0.00009038738,0.55144197,0.0012428126,0.00013191729,0.30946493,0.13311537,0.00045860274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76738185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80842364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42641217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013822442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021321066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9842271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128775454","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1210","title":"Representing a Minor: A Shared Dilemma in Ontario and Massachusetts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Minor (academic); Harm; Compromise; Dilemma; Confidentiality; Law; Irrational number; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04862358677588755,"score_gpt":0.2734139214565873,"score_spread":0.22479033468069978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128775454","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29739794,0.0004986973,0.000014012758,0.0014160109,0.00022551417,0.00011314426,0.0000014281314,0.000023447668,0.7003098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969248,0.00016728269,0.00026293928,0.00013715128,0.00041572686,0.0000046189925,8.48921e-7,0.000009671371,0.0020769672],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849176,0.0001520977,0.00032607868,0.00019808476,0.00042828897,0.00040366437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993578,0.000065930966,0.00016080607,0.00008835218,0.00011730979,0.00020976584],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007874087,0.00010283502,0.00021202538,0.000060812505,0.0013086251,0.00026386074,0.00019028364,0.00010230901,0.00038533306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018042763,0.000095438954,0.0000507077,0.00015981191,0.00018784462,0.00066944415,0.000050659473,0.0004281919,0.000013416467],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006160898,0.00014670163,0.75701636,0.00002286605,0.00004680974,0.0012676228,0.056956545,0.000019349814,0.00016905731,0.17931134,0.0030400679,0.0019416844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00266037,0.00014629755,0.19663222,0.0004815151,0.00004224168,0.0013359522,0.005820417,0.00003733382,0.00006860898,0.08554958,0.70638984,0.00083560584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96448404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70334977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019026264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003460767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131200747","doi":"","title":"Fail-Safe Federalism and Climate Change: The Case of U.S. and Canadian Forest Policy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Treaty; Decentralization; Government (linguistics); Climate change; Political science; Corporate governance; Negotiation; Public administration; Business; Politics; Law; Ecology; Finance","score_opus":0.05114417643714488,"score_gpt":0.2662013001789001,"score_spread":0.2150571237417552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131200747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84903294,0.00029304123,0.0000057650545,0.0063816058,0.000062403065,0.0003284362,0.00004456948,0.000014882338,0.14383635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99932855,0.00030708557,0.00005107893,0.00010490021,0.000058956117,7.391543e-7,7.862867e-7,0.000006290678,0.00014162765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992625,0.00013973826,0.00010237557,0.00014842035,0.00008476675,0.0002622135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923545,0.00013834987,0.00013363812,0.00014202602,0.00012598376,0.00022456577],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048591156,0.00008407089,0.00020991429,0.0001290071,0.0013438506,0.000044529694,0.00023287398,0.00008685118,0.00010451007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011179115,0.00007895514,0.000035704412,0.00027261782,0.0007476744,0.00046421122,0.00012149394,0.0000850506,0.000004150869],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036115376,0.00002311631,0.033623595,0.00006836507,0.0000512909,0.00029068306,0.15802091,1.9309854e-7,0.000005363717,0.7996814,0.00042522978,0.0077737076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017734007,0.00046259738,0.12369881,0.00029577085,0.00028635038,0.00043887022,0.759012,0.00015348844,0.0000511305,0.023461355,0.08963034,0.0007359313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98308474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9921834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7762201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042769727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027872686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135982753","doi":"","title":"Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. United States Forest Service","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Center (category theory); Environmental law; Service (business); Environmental protection; Forestry; Political science; Geography; Law; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Business; Chemistry","score_opus":0.0219474293172689,"score_gpt":0.2629660277357925,"score_spread":0.24101859841852358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135982753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7091537,0.00070480903,0.0000289534,0.0049665044,0.000987528,0.000542188,0.00015511138,0.00027633627,0.28318486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904551,0.000052860614,0.00006275427,0.0064052264,0.00073800347,0.000022034414,0.00015148052,0.00002639119,0.0020861516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809307,0.00019801171,0.00027422243,0.00029467157,0.00063336786,0.0005066835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989188,0.000060066253,0.00011273072,0.0002240912,0.00010098834,0.0005833566],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000520146,0.0001759583,0.00021508486,0.00003856438,0.00061258324,0.0002711956,0.00038723674,0.00014298756,0.00035457007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055687513,0.00016467416,0.000056397337,0.00033547785,0.00030237105,0.00067249755,0.000104310726,0.00020683874,0.0013223714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014831143,0.0006760232,0.083530046,0.00010999942,0.0001365486,0.00006970129,0.025191296,0.00034703474,0.00020357796,0.85157996,0.037679404,0.00032808183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069596514,0.000059933074,0.00044930313,0.00003851936,0.000014253971,0.0000021656203,0.00655139,0.00003219884,0.00011522883,0.0075592264,0.9842398,0.00024197585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24239242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22954853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94656044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020472982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011833398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139388177","doi":"10.25071/1916-9272.34375","title":"The Yellow Brick Road? Establishing a Constitutional Right to State-Funded Counsel for Matters of Civil Law in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Public Policy Administration and Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; State (computer science); Brick; Political science; Constitutional right; Constitutional law; Engineering; Constitution; Civil engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.040851247097714566,"score_gpt":0.2943698147545478,"score_spread":0.2535185676568332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139388177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40754294,0.00067799096,0.0034226116,0.26526526,0.0013545114,0.0013586073,0.00020156862,0.000019743049,0.32015678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99688447,0.000047392656,0.000025338146,0.0026667428,0.00018018628,0.0000033235192,6.0412833e-7,0.0000027510096,0.00018917267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881566,0.0001809404,0.0003959304,0.000053315227,0.0003414937,0.00021265665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988929,0.00030954712,0.00031619682,0.000059934355,0.0002686362,0.00015277338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021522949,0.00006112771,0.00013373284,0.000041210133,0.0005340189,0.00016746504,0.00024710776,0.000026921174,0.00002370941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028252805,0.00003733818,0.000027479595,0.00021479267,0.0006113779,0.00045719583,0.000011288784,0.00009236407,2.8963413e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069449394,0.000020289155,0.00020779525,0.0000115412495,0.000018374672,0.0000018976962,0.004867841,0.0000041132885,0.000029322893,0.9908164,0.0036607205,0.0002922642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064844696,0.00022006224,0.0018079266,0.00008348387,0.000021803033,0.00003927256,0.00907571,0.000021199801,0.00048079062,0.04954348,0.937907,0.00015086509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9417623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99647325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9412729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016830281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052206335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92611796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139950611","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2364141","title":"Joint Venture Theurgy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Joint venture; Business; Joint (building); Venture capital; Business administration; Finance; Engineering","score_opus":0.010635684814514558,"score_gpt":0.2528073147070377,"score_spread":0.24217162989252317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139950611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53955334,0.020799682,0.0027342534,0.03742955,0.0025045974,0.00077283144,0.0000013134999,0.00022790399,0.3959765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856118,0.0027987738,0.000009259985,0.00021335887,0.00159996,0.0000070995247,3.2004655e-7,0.000010814125,0.009748603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974467,0.00013070456,0.00019016942,0.00010922109,0.0003544739,0.0017687372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995028,0.000022342625,0.0001256794,0.00007261507,0.0001529427,0.00012364844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015079653,0.00008234634,0.00012986996,0.00004821914,0.00071269856,0.0002011729,0.00023680902,0.00008307457,0.00041546562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014844208,0.00006393181,0.00008801201,0.00018091773,0.000077799064,0.0004053286,0.000017724973,0.00097416167,0.00035830558],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042567353,0.000037603815,0.00081397133,0.0000042861825,0.000058811278,0.0000021336061,0.0031940537,0.0000028552965,0.00027233784,0.9513806,0.003860385,0.040368706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001817269,0.00009567181,0.00051218114,0.00002075147,0.000010130949,0.000043438497,0.01520669,0.000003419831,0.00003132604,0.77711135,0.2066453,0.00013799783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013431518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009255395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44605845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005208526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023548275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99313813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142554591","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2002.tb00848.x","title":"DETERMINING THE EFFECTIVE REPRESENTATION OF A CHILD IN OUR LEGAL SYSTEM","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Association (psychology); Process (computing); Professional responsibility; Psychology; Law; Professional conduct; Child custody; Association rule learning; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.03252536613617515,"score_gpt":0.33035479595454686,"score_spread":0.29782942981837174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142554591","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04790783,0.29500026,0.000072559706,0.017567493,0.0011651368,0.005272876,0.000010434051,0.00013239562,0.63287103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862348,0.012835832,0.0000062953372,0.0004774819,0.00022019204,0.00008228026,6.416568e-7,0.0000060690236,0.00013642019],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985131,0.0005022722,0.00033514234,0.0001499075,0.0003383425,0.00016123064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936926,0.00012629172,0.00020831876,0.00014356158,0.000118510754,0.000034078443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010564869,0.00007724487,0.00032923825,0.0000312756,0.00019954526,0.00003426808,0.00020176661,0.000046374847,0.000008161632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005313638,0.000052584695,0.00008354133,0.0005482381,0.00004216672,0.00019107958,0.000022557277,0.00012242307,0.000037390357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029354958,0.00052399747,0.10021816,0.025565421,0.00020532339,0.00009155193,0.038070735,0.000041787775,0.00009239563,0.06641686,0.15014431,0.6186001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001038575,0.00018969511,0.120691374,0.056402605,0.00023943205,0.000011747601,0.020064868,0.00028790714,0.000046107678,0.00010329292,0.80034745,0.00057696475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073867952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010051925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93832695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007994246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029265624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142746656","doi":"","title":"EF Cultural Travel v. Explorica: The Protection of Confidential Commercial Information in the American and Canadian Contexts","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Confidentiality; Business; Meaning (existential); Point (geometry); Constructive; Scope (computer science); Internet privacy; Advertising; Law; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.021587877450341436,"score_gpt":0.27180676372958085,"score_spread":0.2502188862792394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142746656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9755207,0.00012694548,0.00006845357,0.0076560928,0.00024890652,0.0007011729,0.000011485266,0.000013916517,0.015652385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986106,0.000043698095,0.0000065849226,0.0009809779,0.00027789475,0.00005360816,0.0000027713531,0.0000027892766,0.000021080494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990373,0.00017033177,0.00022510359,0.000077013145,0.00028151306,0.00020868774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995338,0.0000361681,0.00015131051,0.00008224918,0.00010495922,0.000091546135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000594825,0.00007241919,0.0001396934,0.000040123166,0.0006507702,0.00019790219,0.0002021409,0.00004550524,0.000012409031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016801136,0.0000449897,0.000031149895,0.00034481648,0.00047012966,0.000744827,0.000011140898,0.00018553427,0.000014291473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013368716,0.00009241731,0.006695965,0.00007333498,0.000046451358,0.000006968974,0.25259778,0.00007463927,0.00038031625,0.7107194,0.0019476147,0.027231384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025741372,0.00046181335,0.31280637,0.00020066006,0.00005496388,0.000019482315,0.24155028,0.00001451225,0.0007191599,0.013214685,0.42779565,0.0005882758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9748941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95918334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69750476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011615287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027333552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5005264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143586171","doi":"","title":"Tortious Liability for Negligent Misdiagnosis of Learning Disabilities: A Comparative Study of English and American Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas international law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Punitive damages; Jury; Jurisdiction; Common law; Pleading; Tort; English law; Plaintiff; Political science; Trial court; Liability; Supreme court; Sociology","score_opus":0.038290024550209426,"score_gpt":0.3600164189409897,"score_spread":0.32172639439078027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143586171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9466915,0.00007462696,0.00007206735,0.00018153571,0.00042227737,0.00028427326,0.000010843725,0.000011954834,0.052250896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990033,0.000055145658,0.000073339856,0.000026998963,0.0006592653,0.000013087596,0.0000010503121,0.0000047324647,0.00016306642],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986573,0.00018351595,0.00043586548,0.00013147468,0.00045188892,0.00013994015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976257,0.0006556331,0.00039839235,0.000052365478,0.0011832874,0.00008464218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073868694,0.00007642149,0.0002711788,0.000032971147,0.00036694144,0.00007405158,0.0001934404,0.000025846035,0.00009467634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011026242,0.00006756418,0.000069010726,0.00010470912,0.00062114955,0.00024876295,0.000032164975,0.00012946753,4.9175463e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032437537,0.0013592816,0.4482223,0.000035398407,0.0002770572,0.0000019299873,0.21645975,0.00033882135,0.00001693597,0.33104873,0.0001633985,0.0017520153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002121771,0.003090561,0.031544246,0.00019250528,0.00010770528,0.0000063719995,0.583662,0.00010993149,0.00033505473,0.014660699,0.36381283,0.00035632701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05595402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056076214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41667804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010863702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055137527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9611479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153328781","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwt036","title":"Religious Values and Two Same-Sex Marriage Cases Decided by the Supreme Court of the United States","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Supreme court; Law; Estate; State (computer science); Spouse; Political science; Legislation; Federal law; Constitutionality","score_opus":0.013814926514620133,"score_gpt":0.27714526891225655,"score_spread":0.2633303423976364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153328781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9822854,0.005868402,0.000023430055,0.005646385,0.00023242459,0.000194418,0.0000050560316,0.00000630712,0.0057381676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797747,0.018852068,0.000022914872,0.00080775685,0.0001988126,0.0000017396253,9.302424e-7,0.0000074199893,0.00033367044],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879354,0.00021544678,0.00036770492,0.00008391205,0.00036817297,0.00017120394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874705,0.00037969984,0.00039399072,0.000093101604,0.00028877018,0.00009739677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071624236,0.00009410018,0.0002124719,0.000035134504,0.0005386602,0.00014360905,0.00020135369,0.000065465385,0.000008626602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017091646,0.000045535122,0.00006402433,0.00016189633,0.0005334882,0.0002078393,0.00004487691,0.00015495624,4.840308e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051228824,0.00037538575,0.06377982,0.0003967731,0.0006385319,0.00008677891,0.105599724,0.0001992304,0.010529487,0.14399114,0.66346705,0.010423796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013899438,0.00053591916,0.001173681,0.00055041205,0.00017250972,0.00027714568,0.011188548,0.000070906855,0.0031433012,0.19361176,0.78759205,0.00029381862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08380626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017685998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12412502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002032103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066510445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92229474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160729556","doi":"","title":"Mandatory Bankruptcy Counseling: The Canadian Experience","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Legislature; Debt; Creditor; Agency (philosophy); Business; Accounting; Actuarial science; Finance; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.022149580153710335,"score_gpt":0.25935564143064077,"score_spread":0.23720606127693045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160729556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85614216,0.0013783777,0.000045193156,0.0028129118,0.0007434105,0.00026006953,0.0000026581229,0.000056438403,0.1385588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98787236,0.0009180273,0.000011527408,0.00018477834,0.00034732532,6.6271093e-7,0.0000012809132,0.000005804769,0.010658253],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985531,0.00015449947,0.00016572286,0.00022850474,0.00054866675,0.0003495001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991244,0.00006443222,0.00018449203,0.00018696896,0.00016173196,0.00027796693],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054413493,0.00009519829,0.00015079485,0.00006861112,0.0025668067,0.000046068933,0.0007898271,0.00022427969,0.0001697392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005322998,0.00009349104,0.00007959732,0.00032760663,0.00068809546,0.0004323571,0.000037225913,0.00033116605,0.000035680332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012223709,0.000079818536,0.37611166,0.00007335416,0.0001292938,0.0003854874,0.5120308,0.000066205444,0.0025031925,0.032664347,0.07184714,0.0039864844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017666213,0.000018555193,0.01023196,0.000064547225,0.000027191329,0.000011314095,0.054782163,0.000031994823,0.00009115904,0.0002924805,0.93411255,0.00015939493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6145609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30069274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8622654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040274957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008827979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99873173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161250834","doi":"10.1353/sch.2011.0013","title":"Lochner and Constitutional Continuity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Constitution; Substantive due process; Doctrine; Political science; Constitutional law; Constitutional right; Sociology","score_opus":0.05440738764365759,"score_gpt":0.261243954552733,"score_spread":0.20683656690907543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161250834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.103009544,0.017338071,0.003934948,0.00080905115,0.0045013786,0.00016901718,0.0000042836286,0.000037318565,0.8701964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99711317,0.0001941204,0.00038971312,0.00014995072,0.00059775397,5.59442e-7,8.879626e-8,0.0000031214217,0.0015514989],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991136,0.000070843475,0.00026397032,0.00006866859,0.00035211112,0.00013079529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909914,0.000038900987,0.00026486212,0.00004440672,0.00040470116,0.00014797167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009157731,0.000057920493,0.00017161308,0.00007070541,0.0001704201,0.000012437688,0.00013501149,0.00006904108,0.0006416918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016617686,0.000050559727,0.00005651907,0.000044325494,0.0020796277,0.00039960712,0.000014919512,0.00014900466,0.000010954125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014022933,0.00019687857,0.032335237,0.000049824568,0.00009395199,0.00013526111,0.053737886,7.774985e-7,0.00083566306,0.7363348,0.17166178,0.0044777235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023389334,0.000063033214,0.0024086635,0.00004277844,0.000023949242,0.0000288839,0.0011176261,4.6071835e-7,0.000027716394,0.0016778026,0.99429935,0.00007586598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000910336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030316354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89410365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029559302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000855283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76624745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W216126594","doi":"","title":"Sidestepping Deference: How United States v. Ressam Encourages Overly Stringent Review of Sentencing Decisions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Law; Supreme court; Discretion; Standard of review; Ninth; Sentence; Remand (court procedure); Political science; Sentencing guidelines; Criminal Conviction; Conviction; Computer science","score_opus":0.060716333327436534,"score_gpt":0.30114480023069,"score_spread":0.24042846690325348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W216126594","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79185,0.07243809,0.0010632949,0.0032109881,0.0014676875,0.0017980692,0.00011460486,0.0004296852,0.12762761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97348094,0.02438926,0.00055999926,0.0007036414,0.00021994107,0.000024493635,0.0000150693395,0.000018957535,0.00058768265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758315,0.00033609674,0.0005107651,0.00032823233,0.00077828125,0.0004634583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979563,0.00036303556,0.0003970548,0.00032832412,0.00063654874,0.00031877425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013886184,0.00018896082,0.00043074728,0.00010865957,0.00061651826,0.00012578476,0.00049585337,0.00012041466,0.00040788925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021603405,0.0001646896,0.00012960195,0.00086134754,0.0002588211,0.0006031076,0.00010024434,0.00026354488,0.00004306499],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020463293,0.0009841259,0.0733453,0.011767607,0.0007075086,0.0002603308,0.069949895,0.000078865836,0.003049466,0.75494444,0.05003245,0.03467535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011680735,0.0005207231,0.008531859,0.06063273,0.00036083668,0.000011852224,0.07128947,0.00004018931,0.0050646313,0.030541288,0.8201618,0.0016765203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.103708394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021792684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7701294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001094926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032014708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99605703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161914410","doi":"10.1300/j082v48n03_06","title":"Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in North America","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Homosexuality","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Sodomy; Sexual orientation; Gay rights; Gender identity; Homosexuality; Political science; Law; Same sex; Criminology; Gender studies; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04396964410420226,"score_gpt":0.37378586109260487,"score_spread":0.3298162169884026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161914410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99551475,0.0005330546,0.00039481092,0.00071548624,0.00021760151,0.00006343322,0.0000026746998,0.0000065929366,0.002551581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99864453,0.00009347351,0.00023276909,0.00017040224,0.0007531377,7.533236e-7,6.161993e-7,0.0000032666962,0.00010102503],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868673,0.00021734378,0.00039434351,0.00009725176,0.00045007406,0.00015422735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929184,0.000066472945,0.0003117071,0.000053795713,0.00017252447,0.00010366285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012643065,0.00005661028,0.000176323,0.0000665689,0.00016137384,0.00009274865,0.000120254466,0.000043039476,0.00004541493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003324401,0.000049869213,0.000021087693,0.00039025387,0.00012710772,0.0012727774,0.000020537205,0.00015144623,0.0000060946986],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064425374,0.00029147373,0.7900157,0.00006611293,0.00003424811,0.000027898035,0.13048649,0.00008016481,0.00014502316,0.0044119167,0.00092307926,0.07345348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007798386,0.00017169635,0.86543787,0.000012431584,0.00002768367,0.000013669039,0.044091016,0.000017484395,0.000021847263,0.0046532773,0.08456675,0.00020642484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004905188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05907522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08639548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010968185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017711784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9580942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164598656","doi":"","title":"The Paper Tiger Awakens: NOrth American Environmental Law After the Cozumel Reef Case","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tiger; Fishery; Reef; Geography; Law; Political science; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.009028591866510343,"score_gpt":0.2471793717977171,"score_spread":0.23815077993120676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164598656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7304789,0.00048871,0.000009637091,0.008230459,0.00020722963,0.0002816085,0.000007495823,0.00004766473,0.2602483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98452896,0.00040655702,0.0000069138487,0.003784337,0.00052776985,0.00004287261,9.18672e-7,0.000009475612,0.010692199],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884224,0.00014926564,0.0001628263,0.00016577687,0.00033970852,0.00034016202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994397,0.00017142952,0.000067807596,0.00021047483,0.000016547065,0.00009399504],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003557033,0.00009626574,0.000100473655,0.0000066356474,0.0017956647,0.00019428888,0.00021495212,0.000028048988,0.00063983083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002968992,0.00004678944,0.00006017127,0.00018986152,0.0012295796,0.00021418967,0.000049166098,0.00011336394,0.00028325422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036533724,0.00043983135,0.6038603,0.000014990039,0.00026568052,0.0032385914,0.07100947,0.000008760619,0.00009531513,0.13217035,0.053887427,0.13464393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058313846,0.000024812578,0.016223803,0.0000019928175,0.000010197001,0.000042510863,0.012953181,0.0000028383186,0.0000034459176,0.00021093382,0.97036487,0.000103100814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13559242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5253386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91647744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055268938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036914997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169484996","doi":"","title":"How Marriage Became Optional: Cohabitation, Gender, and the Emerging Functional Norms","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Census; Ambivalence; Family law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Stepfamily; Nuclear family; Remarriage; Gender studies; Sociology; Extended family; Family values; Demographic economics; Demography; Political science; Geography; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Population; Economics","score_opus":0.06946662032263941,"score_gpt":0.25978442389773554,"score_spread":0.19031780357509614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169484996","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05277265,0.0013760335,0.009859156,0.014398023,0.00117525,0.00056981907,0.0000054845377,0.00017820537,0.9196654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99084085,0.00007069347,0.00022398714,0.00039369514,0.00047212202,0.000023984743,0.0000022836427,0.000005041103,0.007967347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922454,0.000085615895,0.0001059881,0.00012923607,0.00030648764,0.00014813834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995601,0.00011040684,0.000061105005,0.000057654175,0.00014922186,0.00006146663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007047002,0.00006072783,0.00008644643,0.000026347221,0.0007480101,0.00014811433,0.00009210735,0.000044290224,0.00060866465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020409591,0.00003670383,0.000034995322,0.0001432139,0.00035113434,0.0004108533,0.000024565483,0.000059708877,0.00002156281],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022809156,0.000011535445,0.0044422294,0.0000080225645,0.000019493722,5.413731e-7,0.014843014,6.987209e-7,0.000011617063,0.97636086,0.0035579544,0.00072125084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022237678,0.00004739742,0.15132767,0.000023662624,0.000066447916,0.0000070991846,0.11046701,0.00014689303,0.00006453764,0.41814685,0.31699315,0.00048550803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071542286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002342087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9380682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018094246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007742682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171410223","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rwv021","title":"Space Enough for a Christian Law School","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Space (punctuation); Law; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.028646026292544837,"score_gpt":0.30848409275868804,"score_spread":0.27983806646614323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171410223","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07715929,0.017612856,0.0021577359,0.02245336,0.0023472987,0.00050966186,0.0000064697,0.000036184545,0.87771714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954771,0.0013508035,0.0004441165,0.0006689767,0.0015412836,0.0000018197171,3.7803778e-7,0.000007198659,0.0005083341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991987,0.000047935173,0.0002352705,0.00007444164,0.00027146772,0.00017221435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990276,0.00005006597,0.00022241597,0.00004446213,0.00034917003,0.0003062901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008495287,0.00006565181,0.00018174293,0.000026506545,0.0003488383,0.00012320517,0.000105177416,0.00009027141,0.000003706795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017603114,0.000048273887,0.00006527672,0.00007105288,0.00014989852,0.0003265063,0.000013090267,0.00010460251,0.000002073137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105558305,0.000024158518,0.000115335715,0.000027318818,0.000017196904,0.000009381978,0.0030846654,0.0000034674026,0.000077482895,0.98219186,0.01406023,0.0002833388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052031,0.0002790015,0.0000073157885,0.00008962166,0.000021067663,0.000019927786,0.0010526739,0.0000019185752,0.00014673341,0.05240891,0.94538265,0.0000698487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0146378325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029942477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93132246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004827499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023889188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99192375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173693669","doi":"10.21991/c9rm2r","title":"The Assisted Human Reproduction Act Reference and the Thin Line Between Health and Crime","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Legislature; Legislation; Law; Jurisdiction; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Political science; Reproduction; Criminal jurisdiction; Power (physics); Human rights; Public administration; Politics; Biology","score_opus":0.04897607700576859,"score_gpt":0.3266017884079739,"score_spread":0.27762571140220527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2173693669","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08527998,0.0366337,0.0129527105,0.5183334,0.003996858,0.006983706,0.00018794318,0.00076059136,0.33487114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996626,0.00068815914,0.000086662636,0.0010061057,0.00053747016,0.00011491951,0.00003329433,0.0000057894495,0.0009015608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997505,0.0003580613,0.0005781442,0.00046820298,0.0005021556,0.0005883971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981527,0.00052070845,0.0003235505,0.00030163256,0.00041468267,0.00028673085],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019994106,0.00020802894,0.00032918566,0.00006711614,0.011110664,0.00058619486,0.00029997446,0.00014929844,0.000035317476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015071281,0.00012715349,0.00007015773,0.00029953243,0.015224626,0.00068729254,0.00015607706,0.00035580673,0.000042548887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021181517,0.000015905367,0.009214937,0.000015767377,0.000040674004,5.178878e-7,0.0004943914,0.0000034938646,0.000016297776,0.98017627,0.0031958562,0.0068047214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002066903,0.00012450869,0.01627805,0.00024418617,0.00006293804,0.00007728211,0.01349073,0.000068922505,0.000033387263,0.23483013,0.7322524,0.0004705515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01662018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033384382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9113461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014706377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016203673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99017674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2174176022","doi":"","title":"A Bare Desire to Harm: Transgender People and the Equal Protection Clause","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Golder Associates (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Transgender; Equal Protection Clause; Supreme court; Scrutiny; Plaintiff; Law; Suspect; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Lesbian; Harm; Sociology; Gender studies; Medicine","score_opus":0.11816255827801277,"score_gpt":0.3329016496125383,"score_spread":0.21473909133452557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2174176022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5160087,0.00076375325,0.038375743,0.05515209,0.00090684457,0.0036107746,0.0000053744857,0.0003624627,0.3848143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974923,0.000008139317,0.00004675327,0.00044936698,0.0003005919,0.000065145075,1.9953268e-7,0.0000047615445,0.0016327172],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920905,0.00015522375,0.000096719894,0.00012170692,0.0002609095,0.00015637658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962693,0.00003447777,0.000014016073,0.000059134738,0.00011455309,0.00015090502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090408773,0.000053567892,0.00009849587,0.000019397023,0.00038476975,0.00013629526,0.00009178848,0.000051580646,0.000054886823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025021422,0.000031964635,0.00002076514,0.00024315789,0.000088192806,0.00018442399,0.000015404663,0.00006037496,0.00003771386],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042428132,0.000061381405,0.0013667995,0.00006148177,0.00003985703,0.000002505135,0.51814824,0.000026654963,0.00018510561,0.44785222,0.011795385,0.020036073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004843028,0.00041149106,0.004224361,0.00007578982,0.00007933783,0.000009540771,0.30822003,0.0003074994,0.00096104894,0.0671675,0.61293554,0.00076485786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0569555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039434455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60114014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003188037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015115638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9780934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2175355199","doi":"","title":"The Importance of Selective Federal Preemption in the U.S. Securities Regulatory Framework: A Lesson from Canada, Our Neighbor to the North","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chapman University Digital Commons (Chapman University)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Security market; Business; Third market; Stock exchange; Stock market; Private placement; Investment banking; Financial system; Broker-dealer; Preemption; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.014892692460394107,"score_gpt":0.22434166990413315,"score_spread":0.20944897744373905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2175355199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9290914,0.00012493356,0.00017986364,0.003780238,0.0001724765,0.00049442536,0.00016431119,0.000036980608,0.06595536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974635,0.000038034643,0.0000070748506,0.00016493056,0.00016998568,1.4984305e-7,0.000013526726,0.000009383737,0.0021334023],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981743,0.00021457403,0.00020187628,0.00030350004,0.00060340966,0.0005023466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846095,0.0005490902,0.00023289486,0.00037108394,0.00023302359,0.00015295469],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042678058,0.00018404795,0.0002324587,0.00016458769,0.0021673762,0.00016592932,0.0013607761,0.00012653922,0.0000054552143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013688822,0.00014348212,0.00010679694,0.0013762069,0.00035796376,0.00065645576,0.00023420295,0.00041620343,0.000003448038],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056670484,0.00016882847,0.5131517,0.000026711577,0.00015103264,0.00026446706,0.07575937,0.00010312826,0.0000047362328,0.3996598,0.007853157,0.002290327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003579622,0.00009003455,0.4310182,0.000094765885,0.000033051336,0.0000014117201,0.31317052,0.000009342966,0.000015891052,0.0016664627,0.25322145,0.0003208919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5261219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99088633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46476445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007819159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065421377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2176580901","doi":"","title":"The Celebration of the 40th Anniversary of Ronald H. Brown's Graduation from St. John's School of Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Graduation (instrument); Law; Political science; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.013369594270397833,"score_gpt":0.25584544181841723,"score_spread":0.2424758475480194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2176580901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8864006,0.0005373821,0.000052803614,0.0027181476,0.0012104824,0.00056240096,0.000106039806,0.000034301866,0.108377844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986218,0.000045132696,0.00009226818,0.00014788755,0.0004767818,0.000008115403,0.000007884319,0.00000954436,0.0005905911],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982706,0.00024196303,0.000408643,0.00017804278,0.0007086793,0.00019211358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842966,0.0002483405,0.0005031574,0.00033979773,0.00038184843,0.00009720064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008279182,0.000103220664,0.0002153318,0.000021200196,0.00063703285,0.00007066741,0.00054290524,0.00014367112,0.0002712864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050000736,0.00006817513,0.000120105215,0.00029008504,0.00073284394,0.0005465255,0.00006683013,0.00028673207,0.000018339228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006744352,0.000108120425,0.015068391,0.00005330426,0.000069233916,5.66945e-7,0.0028505898,0.000029802037,0.044252504,0.93177706,0.0048938654,0.00082909444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015691658,0.00023280426,0.08949628,0.0004037422,0.00018863626,7.670139e-7,0.006879034,0.00009718232,0.12975316,0.18971565,0.5810905,0.0005730862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1860475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15833753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74206144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003602142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003531473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8570206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2179633363","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1245","title":"The Charter 25 Years Later: The Good, the Bad, and the Challenges","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Newspaper; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; History; Law; Media studies; Advertising; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.01750348607281817,"score_gpt":0.27215274406333234,"score_spread":0.2546492579905142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2179633363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005255346,0.022863243,0.000029551315,0.10827354,0.0010939882,0.00035130067,0.0000016997031,0.000026710744,0.8621046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988339,0.0069795237,0.0000053354693,0.001085866,0.0023874948,0.0000077646,8.7839e-8,0.000012506127,0.0011824333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797285,0.00052630674,0.000288909,0.00013379492,0.00060141226,0.00047670226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983824,0.00096281816,0.00021114538,0.00022326315,0.00011037816,0.0001100221],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008022892,0.00011854166,0.00014966841,0.000012480076,0.005522249,0.00080997986,0.0007558022,0.00008820176,0.000041029132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001379447,0.0000421157,0.00010847916,0.00011337161,0.0013368503,0.00021633954,0.000080794765,0.00054582465,0.000036547553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003298242,0.00000921684,0.00014101881,0.0000025070365,0.0000446037,0.000008036386,0.016385918,6.450795e-7,0.0000047075036,0.96466106,0.0008189852,0.017890323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054510613,0.000034645942,0.0045606517,0.000039411952,0.00003905906,0.00008255662,0.020397602,0.000006241092,0.000013375087,0.14746734,0.82669765,0.00011637235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0275092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36057594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98308367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003209221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006362645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181345678","doi":"","title":"3) Consider approval of Interlocal Agreement between Canadian County and the City of Oklahoma City pertaining to grading, draining, and hard surf acing of certain streets within the City which are continuations or connecting links in the State or County Highway system or other projects that mutually benefit the two jurisdictions, and is located within Canadian County. Children's Justice Center","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Archaeology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.043355502605640826,"score_gpt":0.2863884139864069,"score_spread":0.24303291138076608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181345678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99019295,0.00008201181,0.00018100828,0.0049485043,0.00015640346,0.0021446727,0.0006768686,0.000027482873,0.0015901191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986058,0.000012419859,0.000065167944,0.0009850909,0.00011980331,0.0000503528,0.000008945838,0.00002093664,0.00013149036],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965303,0.0009163265,0.00087451836,0.00045848155,0.00068557815,0.0005347903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956372,0.0021859375,0.00082912366,0.00033288368,0.00074958603,0.0002652973],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076356716,0.0003073212,0.0006730591,0.00017195496,0.0017571992,0.000363582,0.0004636586,0.0001881288,0.000023545877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017224143,0.00014053777,0.00004605239,0.000743562,0.00095639034,0.00023829447,0.00009087643,0.0005194503,1.6350636e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002949297,0.000030541763,0.6778992,0.00023483839,0.00028813613,0.00000325265,0.31352773,0.000119289165,0.000004586608,0.0068514277,0.00026042943,0.00048565242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004604247,0.00046654025,0.28338808,0.0023838922,0.00067060185,0.000053654698,0.6951932,0.01026365,0.00020110211,0.00037151808,0.0016689071,0.00073467084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.978796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99860686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3945111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027252323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017761417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2189752036","doi":"","title":"A Further Note on Final Note: The Scope and Limits of Judicial Law Making","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Legislature; Political science; Equity (law); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06312479471144636,"score_gpt":0.39137233326407306,"score_spread":0.32824753855262667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2189752036","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2671275,0.0010279648,0.00016192642,0.014045014,0.00031921625,0.00026689042,0.0000014705852,0.000043458298,0.71700656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99709004,0.00012815955,0.00004119027,0.00070487324,0.0006286631,0.000003831035,1.312849e-7,0.000007559587,0.001395538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916875,0.00009083608,0.00011012558,0.00012975192,0.00029744906,0.00020310207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995721,0.00014137311,0.000090104004,0.00009656704,0.000059728434,0.00004015121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004346588,0.000071904964,0.0001293417,0.000019681904,0.0004073554,0.000059779544,0.00014158925,0.00006996835,0.00009027695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014537126,0.000050501578,0.000029766956,0.00021430785,0.00029477113,0.0000825494,0.000024191539,0.0001065802,0.000027355885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048725083,0.00019517189,0.002885773,0.000097001604,0.00004442743,0.000048349495,0.31112584,0.00008739112,0.0033767496,0.5969207,0.0040062517,0.08072502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007706325,0.00035495555,0.0061109327,0.0005461011,0.000052848194,0.0000072111607,0.013147771,0.000055307966,0.0017381012,0.00997332,0.9668452,0.00039760247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0339962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027322235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96283895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002391607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000090991074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9904266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2195660638","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court's Remedial Decision in the Insite Case","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Remedial education; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.024232597098618715,"score_gpt":0.28690811156191726,"score_spread":0.26267551446329857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2195660638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94532996,0.005603737,0.0007723366,0.0056480127,0.0012058101,0.00037800497,7.1784e-7,0.000028305905,0.04103309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994006,0.0044402024,0.000011837537,0.00013322575,0.0011065063,0.0000056490176,1.4374574e-7,0.00000785931,0.0002885992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971047,0.0004301382,0.00028581088,0.000117263866,0.00053693145,0.0015251338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992279,0.00031553075,0.00013839938,0.00013452666,0.00011674289,0.00006692756],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009227055,0.00008806553,0.00010844151,0.000049414153,0.0017762657,0.00019061915,0.0005618372,0.00008048232,0.000024210993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059314375,0.000046413224,0.0000708395,0.00035695045,0.00018382703,0.00030151175,0.000026146592,0.00127991,0.00002800725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017910935,0.0000931995,0.0071904957,0.0000019593037,0.00004483634,0.00042906796,0.06368357,0.0000016533486,0.00001689248,0.83893156,0.001348358,0.088079326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005319045,0.00024589518,0.0015204299,0.000031392417,0.00002324055,0.0020519479,0.11490081,0.0000091331,0.000010291929,0.77339995,0.10710391,0.0001711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021288514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5922872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57099867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040643403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021383585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2196959378","doi":"","title":"Last Words: A Survey and Analysis of Federal Judges' Views on Allocution in Sentencing","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Remorse; Sentencing guidelines; Criminal justice; Political science; Law; Craft; Psychology; Criminal procedure; Economic Justice; Quarter (Canadian coin); Criminology; Social psychology; Sentence; History","score_opus":0.02047924057071578,"score_gpt":0.2979585752552062,"score_spread":0.27747933468449043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2196959378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99375314,0.0007348734,0.0012786373,0.000382146,0.00007529798,0.00007396285,0.0000012451812,0.000007656313,0.0036930582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99852425,0.0010786875,0.0000057846064,0.00006349544,0.00014659081,0.0000014142798,0.0000024093447,0.0000050136027,0.00017234453],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782664,0.00060106255,0.00029808897,0.0001393293,0.00030554784,0.0008293653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943084,0.00014298291,0.00020484388,0.000058648842,0.0001002464,0.00006246837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072653177,0.000078265206,0.00028719424,0.000251037,0.0002828494,0.0000777966,0.000119517616,0.00006429817,0.00001088976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051713665,0.00006651065,0.00007250609,0.0008504879,0.000064601096,0.00017166746,0.000013060734,0.00050305424,0.00000217712],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000751023,0.00008249837,0.8995819,0.000011514006,0.00034454218,8.8757207e-7,0.006263006,0.00017350834,0.00012489609,0.06993974,0.000041739288,0.023360664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001863327,0.0012083193,0.8693648,0.00022652092,0.00031059698,0.000016211146,0.040236447,0.0012533817,0.00004964956,0.0786526,0.00615284,0.0006653004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031830635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75359774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7217671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000427233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006566369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97461647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W219804546","doi":"","title":"Applying the Holder Standard to Speech That Provides Material Support to Terrorism in United States V. Mehanna","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard journal of law & public policy/Harvard journal of law and public policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Civil liberties; Terrorism; Verdict; Conviction; Political science; Habeas corpus; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03616701957154553,"score_gpt":0.3136454666598135,"score_spread":0.27747844708826797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W219804546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6665294,0.00022562915,0.00056680624,0.2687687,0.002627545,0.003713349,0.00036677794,0.00010509289,0.057096682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97002757,0.0004940333,0.0003893861,0.022052849,0.0064249565,0.00009036936,0.000007894401,0.00007179834,0.00044116733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921734,0.0011134263,0.0022175834,0.00036099754,0.0023209972,0.0018136282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99241585,0.00041564385,0.0018548131,0.0004002964,0.0025818623,0.0023315225],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007112794,0.00054792746,0.0013065587,0.002103999,0.0011252281,0.0045964024,0.0018290582,0.00033084312,0.00076976046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020949678,0.00037932763,0.00037389563,0.0022049274,0.0007668244,0.0050760605,0.00035947093,0.00097569934,0.000111168454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077048934,0.0005619713,0.006275479,0.00026306332,0.0007596683,0.00031315975,0.03839235,0.00006175038,0.0014137472,0.85844547,0.061975203,0.030767664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012423451,0.0007569355,0.0009273772,0.00029544713,0.000047429956,0.0005344715,0.0042173853,0.0000038643,0.0003826987,0.015437739,0.9757203,0.0004339976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16826272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010702794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9137451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007007476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004533054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2198551708","doi":"10.7202/1100326ar","title":"THE NEW CHOICE OF LAW RULES IN TORTS: THE AFTERMATH OF TOLOFSON V. JENSEN; LUCAS V. GAGNON","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02331861216708627,"score_gpt":0.3094122674864674,"score_spread":0.28609365531938113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2198551708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77720386,0.0005345049,0.00003181634,0.010857158,0.0008631948,0.00027814956,0.00003100439,0.000043401687,0.21015689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99601215,0.00032939864,0.000017100869,0.0001533727,0.0006132003,0.000017682016,0.000004865945,0.000008040491,0.0028441844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888414,0.00008997678,0.00034589125,0.000121384284,0.00036105927,0.00019752428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988228,0.00064970716,0.0002084987,0.00014066674,0.00012971787,0.000048579324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007660487,0.00006757005,0.00014308759,0.00005755816,0.00015548363,0.000055825683,0.00051689765,0.000062619205,0.000039568713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065790553,0.000050462757,0.00008190624,0.0002575286,0.00018879387,0.00014993356,0.000043669042,0.00010593846,0.000022114398],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028839086,0.000032294607,0.006387541,0.00003691032,0.000029932786,0.000008505035,0.012145402,0.000059508686,0.00027544805,0.97508746,0.002155241,0.0037529285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027362158,0.00003272972,0.03564174,0.00033455226,0.000014709551,0.000005270257,0.0024410274,0.00030099563,0.00040771096,0.07074874,0.889665,0.00013386643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22698396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26625744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9043387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013593679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033044018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7781636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2200737601","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: POLI 220 - The Politics of Human Rights: Finding Supreme Court of Canada Decisions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Politics; Political science; Law; Human rights; Supreme Court Decisions","score_opus":0.043216611542104086,"score_gpt":0.31423144463254943,"score_spread":0.27101483309044533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2200737601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010118051,0.0017206352,0.000022076367,0.0047908667,0.0021671732,0.0008286114,0.0004624523,0.000055070155,0.97983503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7882836,0.00016106426,0.000082754756,0.0003518311,0.0023931703,0.000019754285,0.000038990544,0.00003882995,0.20863],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99612117,0.00022885093,0.0011286262,0.0002966775,0.0015435292,0.0006811335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99630004,0.0013094543,0.0008033748,0.0004744153,0.00087579206,0.00023690952],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008733598,0.00028254176,0.00077570515,0.00014368066,0.0019212938,0.00011837716,0.0013702353,0.00040340272,0.0015780651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010047723,0.00017819133,0.00018576883,0.00044734273,0.00073453557,0.00019526179,0.00015915268,0.00034358248,0.000007845061],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.999129e-7,0.000019206514,0.0001674229,0.000084904066,0.00006469853,0.0000016488989,0.0020370118,0.0000014674257,0.0000107098995,0.25624564,0.7413341,0.000032514694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009506065,0.000041505282,0.0001307449,0.00062107365,0.00006127678,7.0989734e-7,0.0054920763,0.0000025354477,0.00028879775,0.031519804,0.96148735,0.00025905416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9980148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9895925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7781656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003297417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047556525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2207417587","doi":"","title":"My Neighbour's Kid Just Bought a Drone . . . New Paradigms for Privacy Law in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Drone; Law; Privacy law; Political science; Information privacy; Internet privacy; Privacy policy; Computer science","score_opus":0.030682969472982404,"score_gpt":0.29180995916633656,"score_spread":0.2611269896933542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2207417587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5884366,0.060739305,0.010377404,0.10345779,0.007376105,0.003259496,0.000047472757,0.00016813769,0.22613768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927985,0.0006647657,0.000046347963,0.00044511136,0.0021198934,0.000010965714,0.0000029464331,0.000020452966,0.0038909854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996237,0.000120461926,0.00037383844,0.0002036846,0.00057321653,0.002491798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990284,0.000076613906,0.0002028867,0.000110329,0.00013611391,0.00044566524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002100463,0.00014645587,0.0002813333,0.000051705563,0.00046230268,0.00015931492,0.00046301945,0.000088055975,0.0000291991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031160458,0.00013375201,0.00006889786,0.00033711348,0.00006800683,0.00047322517,0.000026062642,0.00079334766,0.0000092013115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000768963,0.00003430786,0.0028558632,0.000009070944,0.00004814387,0.000009144346,0.00381658,0.00004113108,0.000009367983,0.97820604,0.009201722,0.005691719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001235279,0.00014691414,0.00009199275,0.000035090972,0.00001896541,0.000033615757,0.01572251,0.000019187242,0.000022184786,0.38293415,0.5995246,0.00021548002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9922007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5952719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064118085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07961472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2213730134","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2627030","title":"The 'Red Menace' on Trial: Jury Discrimination in Dennis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Law; Jury trial; Political science; Psychology; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0336958732526119,"score_gpt":0.3292454144415412,"score_spread":0.2955495411889293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2213730134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7356993,0.008018693,0.0005647841,0.052956752,0.003586656,0.001143994,0.0000011389826,0.00009097047,0.19793771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99329364,0.002082829,0.0000021095004,0.000066505185,0.0010582265,0.000012138126,4.1386457e-7,0.000008662504,0.0034754581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975041,0.00036677712,0.00024506304,0.000108495944,0.00054854044,0.0012269899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994478,0.00011425641,0.00014941435,0.000075978474,0.00011493521,0.00009759074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068433997,0.00007621515,0.000115018054,0.00006240545,0.0007093231,0.00020125754,0.0002885367,0.00006822315,0.0000040663767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007740349,0.000049627233,0.000050369392,0.00027269896,0.00008302697,0.00026199565,0.000013976727,0.0007687371,0.0000229367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017513722,0.00008297373,0.0003233386,0.0000016756359,0.000025553643,0.000002768311,0.0076415734,0.000011694123,0.000008918241,0.94387114,0.0015771074,0.04470186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0073421746,0.0007834928,0.00025563384,0.000033868364,0.00001529957,0.000008997187,0.05558604,0.000009668089,0.000016490689,0.7678953,0.16789581,0.0001572111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036744438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06828381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25759435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014991461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039621466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9487176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215341176","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1054","title":"Into the Wasteland: Applying Equality Principles to Medical Inadmissibility in Canadian Immigration Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04223248256360731,"score_gpt":0.37202400221443904,"score_spread":0.32979151965083175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215341176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80989957,0.00017547456,0.000018406927,0.0896067,0.00017041288,0.00021827102,0.0000021191545,0.000006627299,0.09990241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917549,0.0000777642,0.0000100679035,0.0054726615,0.0025799929,0.0000043123773,3.4479982e-7,0.0000040421714,0.00009591387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983503,0.00032246628,0.00041203867,0.00008894671,0.0005148288,0.00031142402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903756,0.00008582965,0.00014819922,0.000048586673,0.00013369622,0.00054613623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035820764,0.00006976789,0.00020626755,0.00007194812,0.0010441961,0.00013605789,0.00021283532,0.0001402222,0.00002881035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066988915,0.00004886913,0.00005298171,0.00027820448,0.0002743508,0.00024384994,0.000028643488,0.0002333988,0.0000018688772],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021830367,0.000021214928,0.0049705394,0.000013558592,0.000008048805,0.000011757312,0.10500636,0.0000010983074,0.000008664201,0.8839275,0.000071182374,0.0059382007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027403294,0.0000521029,0.007982,0.0000551495,0.000007999854,0.000008212455,0.01490758,0.00000710374,0.000008139767,0.032588333,0.943993,0.00011638271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9894084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9439218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003730083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002321473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8031218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215800789","doi":"","title":"Professor Raz, the Rule of Law, and the Tobacco Act","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Legislation; Rule of law; Statutory interpretation; Damages; Charter; Interpretation (philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010100793155748654,"score_gpt":0.29329123498091764,"score_spread":0.283190441825169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215800789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7496169,0.017091148,0.0005556924,0.029189454,0.00060729065,0.00058709393,0.0000010775116,0.000028445036,0.20232289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954781,0.0017629773,0.000004246041,0.0003565195,0.0007297005,0.00000230239,8.996955e-8,0.0000060546517,0.0016600441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998095,0.00019661528,0.00023098342,0.0000760829,0.0003487976,0.0010525652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926615,0.00029330997,0.00020199241,0.00008315812,0.00010948217,0.00004592582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010186279,0.00006612691,0.00014018273,0.000020198646,0.001119609,0.00007755784,0.00031823557,0.000057317946,0.00001470458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021465526,0.00003187572,0.00006544791,0.00016229523,0.0005684584,0.00017048836,0.000028157952,0.00076920085,0.000004060951],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007518874,0.000012241533,0.00086678687,0.000002618947,0.000041162857,4.497767e-7,0.007873738,2.5731876e-7,0.000034745113,0.9829502,0.000049493286,0.008093111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012915384,0.000118091266,0.0013391324,0.000039597177,0.00005661909,0.000053784956,0.05193626,0.0000015092185,0.00024054323,0.81438565,0.13039912,0.00013812495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0100997975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05693613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24586116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014687945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012367974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2217600237","doi":"","title":"St. John's School of Law - 2013 Commencement Exercises","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01733951531488466,"score_gpt":0.25310786484930686,"score_spread":0.23576834953442222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2217600237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.860173,0.0010877731,0.000077512836,0.0020506135,0.001022994,0.00032563152,0.0000029675211,0.000009019782,0.13525052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99733984,0.00044347314,0.00045610825,0.00013537431,0.000261093,0.0000065284967,4.664355e-7,0.0000046475075,0.0013524882],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988062,0.000032798926,0.00066859863,0.00009721476,0.00019522815,0.00019999853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999006,0.00005430878,0.000502394,0.000059083326,0.00015014806,0.00022808691],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007167307,0.00009757832,0.00032777947,0.00007336016,0.00033134717,0.00012296872,0.00018795111,0.000055066736,0.0027391382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011794555,0.0000677185,0.000047409216,0.000030123561,0.00015462094,0.0006338883,0.000037250597,0.000084592895,0.00008688182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015797856,0.00069751445,0.025303738,0.00041536163,0.0009214633,0.000027093281,0.058892157,0.00013294323,0.00035329734,0.25687385,0.6341366,0.022088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039753382,0.000067642424,0.0036494194,0.0001539846,0.000015229517,0.000003908965,0.0008907681,0.0000033745064,0.00041949135,0.02119783,0.9730557,0.00014509648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01986103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021975761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3389191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001714758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043102648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2219252445","doi":"","title":"Mistake, Forged Cheques and Unjust Enrichment: Three Cheers for B.M.P. Global","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Unjust enrichment; Business; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Restitution","score_opus":0.03034953253617476,"score_gpt":0.32777009429423465,"score_spread":0.29742056175805986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2219252445","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06323469,0.001438497,0.0059885923,0.018713832,0.0006803859,0.0012445779,0.000027765787,0.00065965066,0.90801203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959367,0.00006055407,0.0002456926,0.0005021842,0.000381861,0.000011977935,0.00000247641,0.000004173353,0.0028543915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991742,0.000015292424,0.00013876482,0.00017581589,0.00019944597,0.00029651728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996399,0.00004538615,0.000047743928,0.0000617667,0.00008615176,0.000118994314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037932495,0.00008224849,0.00013490478,0.000015614774,0.00042317875,0.00012942957,0.0001150459,0.000081051454,0.000020911932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016506562,0.00006874332,0.00004129313,0.00022190694,0.000088086636,0.00025773543,0.000008867629,0.00002877881,0.000009637237],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028185912,0.000041957916,0.0038114744,0.00003261769,0.000019201723,0.0000014121537,0.0022523245,7.0286205e-7,0.00010806989,0.94881415,0.014336326,0.03055358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010468154,0.00031973165,0.02550663,0.000047455676,0.000044653047,9.160539e-7,0.006056191,0.000055613255,0.0001925149,0.45270753,0.5135586,0.00046329745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063479836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0171219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.932702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006690432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009142203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9596295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2220265832","doi":"","title":"\"Purely Personal and Philosophical\": Gov. Winthrop Rockefeller's Death Sentence Commutations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Arkansas Historical Quarterly","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Power (physics); Prison; Federalist; Economic Justice; Life imprisonment; State (computer science); Punishment (psychology); Governor; Barbarism; Repentance; Political science; Imprisonment; Psychology; Philosophy; Civilization; Theology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0664991382152904,"score_gpt":0.2993760663006863,"score_spread":0.2328769280853959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2220265832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38631713,0.012966249,0.0066029667,0.3482856,0.0042802854,0.0014297094,0.00003294654,0.0007253748,0.23935975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962351,0.000030819672,0.00007958003,0.0005488559,0.000983849,0.000021607093,0.0000017567615,0.000013474962,0.0020849882],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827254,0.00032780005,0.0002601214,0.00025127077,0.0005499513,0.00033831122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988839,0.00024376667,0.000107966516,0.00017657557,0.0002241677,0.00036363507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007086469,0.00014604702,0.00022912842,0.000039689236,0.0011936167,0.00013959639,0.00033912613,0.00010674278,0.000039717677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018300525,0.00010705201,0.00006868074,0.00030317553,0.0003901184,0.00028157636,0.000021937489,0.00026872492,0.00010936278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020878908,0.00051234954,0.004482086,0.00005635011,0.00011939316,0.000049059625,0.59792054,0.000008940646,0.00013109663,0.30782476,0.06720799,0.021478627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006789398,0.0008209392,0.0007377693,0.00004769767,0.00008389933,0.000022952916,0.032328993,0.00023123484,0.0000030910564,0.14244537,0.8221468,0.000452351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027743036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022690035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7549388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056353904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025706258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97873133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2225597701","doi":"","title":"Looking for Cover: A Public Choice Critique of the Canadian Debit Card Code","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Enforcement; Cover (algebra); Debit card; Consumer protection; Law and economics; Dispute resolution; Business; Political science; Law; Public administration; Economics; Credit card; Payment; Finance; Engineering","score_opus":0.03345973358785123,"score_gpt":0.2756080004714551,"score_spread":0.24214826688360389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2225597701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93837285,0.00033770996,0.00006438234,0.019471357,0.00029484445,0.00067306455,0.00020644937,0.000042493593,0.040536862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944554,0.00001918776,0.00017032682,0.0004195961,0.00027772682,0.0000012239706,0.0000060764683,0.000015326334,0.004635129],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817604,0.00020114498,0.00020475908,0.00028982494,0.0005835946,0.0005446618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982559,0.00022798467,0.00026371542,0.0002961488,0.00061140064,0.0003448609],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013329142,0.0001388979,0.00030223528,0.00018229027,0.0023837637,0.000087983135,0.0010071893,0.0003044447,0.00023596229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009314476,0.00014840778,0.00025123009,0.0006081217,0.0005337667,0.0010765617,0.00011954334,0.00028796674,0.000025885234],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001559449,0.00020479353,0.85148346,0.00039164812,0.00030295656,0.000009678685,0.042740904,0.00010903491,0.0033543543,0.0862038,0.009412829,0.005630593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093781477,0.000053787513,0.093601175,0.00015772402,0.00009009065,0.0000020867692,0.004640062,0.000023867593,0.0012243807,0.0012058279,0.8977521,0.0003111069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38647354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96566945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8883392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063639355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001764339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2233854638","doi":"","title":"'I Didn't Mean it that Way!': Racial Discrimination as Negligence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Redress; Harm; Racism; Cause of action; Jurisdiction; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Contributory negligence; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.01885133627578977,"score_gpt":0.31370049500736785,"score_spread":0.2948491587315781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2233854638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4555113,0.013824145,0.0118293995,0.06945426,0.0026223608,0.00083972345,0.0000037234777,0.0002949368,0.44562015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878277,0.0047864965,0.00001275489,0.0005361587,0.0018677303,0.0000025605368,0.0000014923442,0.0000100581265,0.0049550533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966703,0.00018431236,0.00026148945,0.00020468257,0.0007695517,0.0019096379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993206,0.00004263915,0.00021758751,0.00009732354,0.00015849067,0.00016335495],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023420223,0.0001388565,0.00018264809,0.0000897712,0.0013386911,0.0002749814,0.00041986298,0.000119075834,0.000105439816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026481395,0.00012031511,0.000114192284,0.00030797243,0.00009878162,0.00084376807,0.000015456082,0.0009441613,0.00009590822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003745868,0.00006607718,0.0003387046,0.0000033166891,0.000026259888,0.0000064590076,0.018231597,0.0000046191626,0.00020072276,0.8538404,0.00045810457,0.12678625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032142605,0.00042165307,0.00082921557,0.000063656975,0.00004031342,0.000055904326,0.040032018,0.000008314032,0.00028365065,0.8904365,0.06721108,0.0002963098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050704842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046369884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5323164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091997057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026852055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2233951085","doi":"","title":"Understanding the Legal Client’s Best Interests: Lessons from Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Comprehensive Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Therapeutic jurisprudence; Best practice; Jurisprudence; Legal ethics; Political science; Economic Justice; Best interests; Law; Legal profession; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.08505117815841898,"score_gpt":0.34161581436623745,"score_spread":0.25656463620781844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2233951085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7913425,0.046325713,0.047859192,0.07945449,0.0026363046,0.001081298,0.000009684326,0.00012601528,0.031164827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899897,0.00775853,0.000009523727,0.0005022783,0.0009140978,0.0000073326605,5.336102e-7,0.00001335871,0.00080462644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751127,0.00028813115,0.00024014272,0.00019821247,0.00039669598,0.0013655549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990716,0.00036915767,0.00018334754,0.000109172106,0.00014685851,0.00011988802],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083501544,0.00013714738,0.00017588884,0.000045774257,0.0018337573,0.00067202444,0.00040835887,0.00008632437,0.0000686482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009237435,0.00009330867,0.000060304734,0.00019564184,0.00038635894,0.0006548615,0.00005447668,0.0012526109,0.000059318834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015358284,0.000031696367,0.0009269907,0.0000070130686,0.00012611214,0.000002568491,0.0063622044,0.0000058298606,0.00022293582,0.9852247,0.00034799177,0.006726602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034614516,0.00015983815,0.0011422243,0.00009403877,0.00014614074,0.00004991833,0.26199293,0.00005991627,0.000010160346,0.71562886,0.020157523,0.00021228899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03140932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045355644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26959583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084931334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001368913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2234269269","doi":"","title":"An Obvious ‘Comity of Errors’: Canadian Federal Court of Appeal Admonishes Motives of Applications Judge, While Agreeing with the Result","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comity; Appeal; Notice; Jurisprudence; Law; Order (exchange); Political science; Federal court; Supreme court; Business; Jurisdiction","score_opus":0.012548161888682005,"score_gpt":0.27087271868717516,"score_spread":0.25832455679849314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2234269269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97794896,0.0030054247,0.0011186029,0.0018179709,0.00008195559,0.00038230084,0.000020060372,0.000012406392,0.015612293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990517,0.00030031006,0.00003714179,0.00002477527,0.00040963796,0.000007717449,0.0000019197296,0.00001071255,0.00015608869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780214,0.00018818793,0.00031679193,0.000105757725,0.0004075645,0.001179551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883753,0.000065628636,0.000457297,0.00014707197,0.0002927158,0.00019977232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002432048,0.000099100325,0.0002372802,0.000075697055,0.00080048863,0.000036196212,0.00041463334,0.00007813997,0.000011414089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052120056,0.000068399364,0.00006636105,0.0003347044,0.00037176465,0.0003802638,0.000012522081,0.0005420888,0.0000010560178],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020332255,0.00058341306,0.4329292,0.00009454293,0.0005416957,0.000001213869,0.058151957,0.00024113913,0.002204996,0.49182957,0.0006325953,0.01258637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033738692,0.00343138,0.25454783,0.0005480479,0.00051494257,0.00020127678,0.5768648,0.000072857576,0.0060568596,0.09789872,0.05495517,0.0015342777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39029437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.835711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5187128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034402288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004757474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84395546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2237559586","doi":"","title":"The Unbearable License of Being the Executive: A Response to Stacey's Permanent Environmental Emergency","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"License; Business; Emergency response; Environmental law; Law; Law and economics; Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Economics; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.0186498126633165,"score_gpt":0.2831260062512624,"score_spread":0.2644761935879459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2237559586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9204805,0.0019191648,0.000014373841,0.008021778,0.00074772054,0.0006162043,0.000016568938,0.000042610154,0.06814108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98396623,0.00018942487,0.000020652707,0.00027066664,0.00035804068,0.00004176377,9.0401636e-7,0.000013888814,0.015138408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765694,0.000672602,0.00031478907,0.00021549918,0.00073111954,0.00040906205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894583,0.0002175863,0.00013079743,0.00031463598,0.00007979484,0.00031134044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002866511,0.00012188657,0.00016041876,0.000022048152,0.0012710134,0.000110684035,0.00050942856,0.00006809631,0.00015822459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006621752,0.000076684686,0.00007567936,0.00027984584,0.0003054575,0.00024294837,0.00013243628,0.0001763076,0.0003035396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039054523,0.0005945334,0.026898222,0.0000701172,0.00028282613,0.00005954024,0.32360223,0.00034782986,0.027652469,0.4349487,0.1773248,0.0043132766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020881822,0.00012045165,0.0019216469,0.000028540204,0.000015057349,0.0000011876979,0.03000316,0.0000037068244,0.00069937797,0.0026843296,0.9641708,0.00014290179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021670207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00982414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78684604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017432006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023741722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98484457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2242865105","doi":"","title":"Great Strides in Section 9 Jurisprudence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Arbitrariness; Jurisprudence; Section (typography); Law; Doctrine; Discretion; Political science; Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.017257866464203964,"score_gpt":0.29136850088250155,"score_spread":0.2741106344182976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2242865105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6608508,0.001093481,0.000068692156,0.0029155875,0.0009093632,0.00035233042,0.0000035181117,0.00020623095,0.33359995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956159,0.00011283714,0.000060090475,0.0005871877,0.0012831746,0.0000092629925,0.0000012653531,0.000006094635,0.0023241763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986688,0.00012371394,0.00023080804,0.0002461945,0.00038072836,0.00034974032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995018,0.000051751995,0.00007350205,0.00013465538,0.00007723977,0.00016102544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059637654,0.00010276644,0.00017144003,0.000056917033,0.00042426243,0.00019408406,0.00022643841,0.00013721635,0.00024987268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023602488,0.0001000401,0.000048001286,0.0005073249,0.00010297529,0.00071706326,0.00001523102,0.00021994718,0.0001580435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009937831,0.0002729305,0.07073632,0.00006172897,0.000020069796,0.00010001293,0.008263299,0.00012981835,0.0026858766,0.87720174,0.014914373,0.025514487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069541164,0.00021850613,0.049603343,0.00026322764,0.000014599389,0.000004248762,0.0022262684,0.0000152174935,0.0015562562,0.054474726,0.8903855,0.0005426821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.075343564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09917414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8754711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001650188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001608553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9308138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246056922","doi":"","title":"Empirical Data on S. 24(2) Under R. v. Grant","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Econometrics; Economics","score_opus":0.12420499618619098,"score_gpt":0.35387194108754516,"score_spread":0.2296669449013542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2246056922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.286607,0.01308956,0.013917308,0.025148734,0.005372494,0.0007886182,0.000029456512,0.00039701414,0.6546498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99340445,0.0020505134,0.000026641534,0.0005052732,0.0012362878,0.0000015912068,0.0000026116847,0.0000147764185,0.0027578352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700165,0.00020510226,0.00023292353,0.00023670724,0.00050881744,0.0018148132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932426,0.000051242583,0.00012629412,0.000262098,0.0000823218,0.00015376472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030821483,0.000109277506,0.00015917353,0.00006412711,0.0007777141,0.00008801775,0.0008655718,0.00010232395,0.00018316721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019012236,0.00008540573,0.000058251528,0.0002429752,0.00013857118,0.00041781392,0.00006520965,0.0012164026,0.0001652331],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008122341,0.00018831437,0.0037999193,0.0000039115466,0.0001160019,0.000011255015,0.005224745,0.0000012742802,0.000013058165,0.97121966,0.006734111,0.0126065565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004134862,0.00037480477,0.0013515084,0.000032387587,0.000038558133,0.000057892972,0.014614214,0.000006420341,0.000022043627,0.78856236,0.19426936,0.0002569372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072371974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036702756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7067975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004731475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00375422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2247076484","doi":"","title":"What's wrong with Canada's animal cruelty laws? : Bill C-50, a touchstone for change.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cruelty; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03904586659535517,"score_gpt":0.3254996254135036,"score_spread":0.2864537588181484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2247076484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94647926,0.0050467676,0.000024780697,0.0009482154,0.00228439,0.0015351769,0.000016075399,0.00008864342,0.043576706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9297542,0.00081118284,0.0000745369,0.0000073917136,0.0015705986,0.0000058590745,0.00008002873,0.000030114417,0.06766609],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969352,0.00034113872,0.00017922862,0.0004949644,0.0013960792,0.00065339735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972082,0.00048611272,0.00029387357,0.00015639537,0.0015037855,0.0003516674],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014514867,0.00019126985,0.0004167511,0.0002468323,0.003274602,0.0002913762,0.00037823222,0.00039087242,0.000047080277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022116913,0.0001909469,0.00006920762,0.0005110177,0.00037175568,0.0007322502,0.000049151877,0.000878141,0.0000019513527],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025671415,0.0010734291,0.048030734,0.011872623,0.0021994154,0.0018784386,0.7739467,0.000040325784,0.011405808,0.012235218,0.044918247,0.06672765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055512,0.0010649484,0.009587831,0.000879771,0.000056503883,0.0000026793425,0.26562095,0.000014366606,0.00016826855,0.000067564506,0.72163635,0.00034564442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.919387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9437591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6767181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045783678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023572287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W225236535","doi":"","title":"Canadian Price-Fixing Class Actions: The Supreme Court of Canada Gives the Green Light to Indirect Purchaser Claims","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Plaintiff; Damages; Class action; Legislation; Certiorari; Political science; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.01908005545827297,"score_gpt":0.25304099785432815,"score_spread":0.2339609423960552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W225236535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5162268,0.0014248634,0.00038764437,0.24963386,0.0041152546,0.0008798266,0.0000619002,0.0000459399,0.22722386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99371856,0.000119509445,0.000011053086,0.0026237092,0.0015402087,0.000009708051,5.7987194e-7,0.000014443815,0.001962234],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975733,0.00044397663,0.00035101888,0.00014955457,0.00090698275,0.0005751532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982304,0.00031548194,0.0002523556,0.00020150594,0.0005246883,0.00047555758],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002661773,0.0001325123,0.00021530259,0.000099320925,0.0031490843,0.00026126407,0.000630959,0.00008675163,0.00012422696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043514583,0.00007917073,0.00007968002,0.00050955464,0.00012652323,0.00019252484,0.000018688352,0.00041739852,0.000011153608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011471647,0.00006749154,0.011058954,0.00008103411,0.00045150443,0.00008703696,0.19890746,0.00048093472,0.0009541515,0.04539834,0.7335991,0.008799233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000099773766,0.000031473228,0.0017787315,0.00005538753,0.00003445877,0.000035270183,0.009563899,0.000021135995,0.00008231055,0.0022832418,0.98588675,0.00012753722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97632205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4774917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057180465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004867033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252996208","doi":"","title":"'Juice Formulation is Not Rocket Science' and Other Observations: Cadbury Schweppes Inc. v. FBI Foods Ltd.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Rocket (weapon); Business; Aeronautics; Agricultural science; Environmental science; Engineering","score_opus":0.025466864391134898,"score_gpt":0.2995919398515941,"score_spread":0.2741250754604592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252996208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9665395,0.003376286,0.00021720823,0.0061664926,0.00019408156,0.00025808866,0.000005869772,0.00006162843,0.023180863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921198,0.0022496923,0.00006119218,0.001183789,0.00074825337,0.00000596666,6.255995e-7,0.000014073738,0.0036165938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696386,0.000088437264,0.00030177538,0.00023622629,0.0008546656,0.0015550101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918205,0.00005355992,0.00015304242,0.00010230874,0.00036122586,0.00014782079],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003947038,0.00012364998,0.00015786447,0.00013315893,0.0026117556,0.0004541232,0.00034120737,0.00010754966,0.00022472568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024378754,0.00010900544,0.000041130912,0.00078139495,0.00028032268,0.0014758249,0.000023573202,0.0006409655,0.000035423305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114189876,0.00010966867,0.018318944,0.00002427014,0.000108231274,0.00000182378,0.019591155,0.000024662178,0.0013161561,0.59926325,0.0013939197,0.3597337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008723924,0.00033549278,0.006227073,0.000088490364,0.000054921064,0.000069229514,0.011746386,0.00023620231,0.00055236585,0.28906742,0.69024545,0.00050460245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012808887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017653022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68885154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079513376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051315953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99868673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253606702","doi":"","title":"Regulated Conduct and the Competition Act","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Competition (biology); Subject (documents); Political science; Law and economics; Business; Public relations; Economics; Computer science; Biology; Library science; Ecology","score_opus":0.052357448705167835,"score_gpt":0.34681847559608364,"score_spread":0.2944610268909158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253606702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7009467,0.000577169,0.0000148025765,0.011305871,0.0001337062,0.00016113037,2.9771627e-7,0.000056906185,0.28680342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926467,0.00012659424,0.000017009532,0.00014932298,0.00015886308,0.0000033151225,5.2230956e-7,0.0000023541368,0.006895326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995153,0.00011711905,0.000055219953,0.00007065064,0.0001409511,0.00010074064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999743,0.00008435427,0.0000363971,0.000054754848,0.000045077944,0.000036443307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031734916,0.000036118257,0.00008263282,0.000009809027,0.000744332,0.000030485982,0.00006133928,0.00003439703,0.0001108832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009314235,0.000022823919,0.00001622984,0.00012125674,0.00055001583,0.00008364435,0.000011870281,0.00004999774,0.000024283449],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009928766,0.000022542989,0.001544338,0.000014844488,0.000023025525,0.000010611996,0.1773178,0.0000036337779,0.00040254812,0.80731225,0.012699165,0.00054992276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013097501,0.00004004419,0.005771077,0.00003728931,0.00001627802,0.000017330838,0.01489131,0.000037527254,0.00037616372,0.010929861,0.9664002,0.0001731619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037812494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027188088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.953701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013372431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005109761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9685948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254003184","doi":"","title":"R. v. Khadr : Did Prime Minister Harper Commit a Contempt of Court?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contempt; Prime minister; Commit; Irony; Law; Political science; Politics; Prime (order theory); Government (linguistics); Philosophy","score_opus":0.03263190839115979,"score_gpt":0.3082248196504549,"score_spread":0.2755929112592951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254003184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31125277,0.025268614,0.0036019133,0.03001052,0.0022464981,0.0008081704,0.00001272495,0.00013787187,0.62666094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871587,0.00051189086,0.000020926313,0.00017156551,0.0008175176,0.000003638152,7.8367214e-7,0.000014640237,0.011300325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997158,0.00024914264,0.00038229028,0.0001390472,0.00064594747,0.0014256084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886507,0.00006438601,0.00030405767,0.0001209505,0.00042595502,0.00021960668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038506845,0.000117511445,0.00028947985,0.00006595948,0.00033390566,0.00009621292,0.0003930355,0.00011136923,0.00007401531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032925437,0.0000977141,0.00011140844,0.00021039134,0.0002258473,0.00035085695,0.000032674212,0.00076877547,0.000046881203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027483326,0.00033270076,0.018032327,0.000028267392,0.00037192716,0.000014079648,0.02613955,0.000004765148,0.00041759014,0.9173777,0.022862246,0.014143983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013770609,0.00060886453,0.00019817753,0.00008366732,0.000055475928,0.00006964381,0.037105497,0.0000069647776,0.0002646482,0.17821255,0.7817323,0.00028512694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005677143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015067664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75887007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063521153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063510523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255864694","doi":"","title":"A Fundamental Right of the Monied to 'Buy Out Of' Universal Health Care Program Restrictions Versus the Moral Claim of Everyone Else to Decent Health Care: An Unremitting Paradox of Health Care Reform?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Government (linguistics); Supreme court; Right to health; Law; Constitutional right; Substantive due process; Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Public administration; Medicaid; Economics","score_opus":0.02374570358356102,"score_gpt":0.3582294755513623,"score_spread":0.33448377196780127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255864694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9619913,0.024951717,0.00036765044,0.0075722104,0.0010782626,0.0023243155,0.000069159425,0.000039867336,0.0016054849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984582,0.0008972318,0.00018056169,0.0001381075,0.00025680033,0.0000068604154,0.0000060873,0.000018293465,0.000037880334],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99535346,0.0005961139,0.0010545554,0.0002463952,0.0009878664,0.0017616285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974484,0.00007269494,0.0012931954,0.00028715757,0.0005651677,0.0003334211],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030159059,0.00017736813,0.0005345662,0.00016513026,0.0013531565,0.000028439548,0.00062660803,0.00008981198,0.000003482637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008929487,0.00012091868,0.00018892052,0.0011171096,0.00021429485,0.00018354632,0.00007878917,0.00080266525,5.789107e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021388321,0.00072973006,0.020115344,0.0006520693,0.00041338056,0.0000024449591,0.7031414,0.00044776264,0.00012747767,0.080865756,0.00047622842,0.19088961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014455664,0.0072619477,0.0073561966,0.0003603535,0.00004191035,0.0000074121253,0.97148645,0.0000024160092,0.0002519497,0.00045371198,0.011135602,0.00019647312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15400456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45035815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29635358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008566846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017704312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256778810","doi":"","title":"The Reach of Patent Law and Institutional Competence","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Libertarianism; Patent troll; Law and economics; Statutory interpretation; Normative; Utilitarianism; Political science; Law; Competence (human resources); Statutory law; Legislature; Intellectual property; Patent law; Economics","score_opus":0.016907777604288205,"score_gpt":0.2626571450379325,"score_spread":0.2457493674336443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256778810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62680113,0.061563663,0.0022171978,0.027869739,0.0007439547,0.00038698938,0.0000041083213,0.00005386533,0.28035933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99189013,0.006984831,0.000024550844,0.00009897723,0.0005135722,0.0000013557814,1.6686953e-7,0.0000025012152,0.0004839001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986953,0.00008036546,0.0001711511,0.000065129025,0.00029125068,0.000696796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963796,0.000057634927,0.00010583885,0.000041930878,0.00010575585,0.0000508854],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020246115,0.000045516714,0.00007726595,0.000014146456,0.0013130866,0.000064116044,0.0001672119,0.00003304117,0.000005621576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000703562,0.000029580637,0.000030835334,0.00008822379,0.00042566916,0.0002068781,0.000016513028,0.00041880738,0.0000041285634],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008340847,0.000011734517,0.00042756283,0.0000014870781,0.00001559893,2.501708e-7,0.0006917321,0.0000074148334,0.00006200638,0.9805503,0.000021353766,0.018202204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039512583,0.00015114566,0.000897176,0.000043851956,0.000018363184,0.00009782633,0.008500361,0.000034938523,0.00009213201,0.44143307,0.5482052,0.00013077525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059190653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07259643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54818386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026129337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017242777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258265011","doi":"","title":"Review of Sexual Science and the Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Speculation; Law; Psychology; Criminal law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.015712209525683193,"score_gpt":0.2923488644332383,"score_spread":0.2766366549075551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258265011","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09261452,0.7087524,0.00015712364,0.026222114,0.00038547174,0.00050735404,9.759134e-7,0.000028712459,0.17133133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8060258,0.19265841,0.0000036987767,0.0006997856,0.00022252467,0.0000013991813,2.8584505e-8,0.000002324544,0.00038602957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982258,0.00013359793,0.00018532401,0.000087542605,0.0005578911,0.00080981024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993293,0.000064707565,0.00014546233,0.00006791132,0.0003352483,0.0000573196],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009488222,0.000046293728,0.00014678587,0.00002346881,0.0015142728,0.000029920115,0.00030592925,0.000020389387,0.0000100035395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000663962,0.00002737044,0.000022426679,0.00040223406,0.002545319,0.00027411405,0.000026706359,0.00043156624,0.000003005551],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007185404,0.000006252934,0.000070180344,0.000059924078,0.00000850039,4.269375e-7,0.0015742948,5.500468e-8,0.00002743958,0.9954859,0.00021690161,0.002542917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019355563,0.00050361676,0.0002798528,0.0017483728,0.00012444405,0.0010977872,0.025608795,0.0000066877187,0.00011444826,0.48682073,0.48138317,0.00037651436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009110547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057398514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7134113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020506141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060828193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258680811","doi":"10.82308/23794","title":"Taxing charities, imposer les organismes de bienfaisance : harmonization and dissonance in Canadian charity law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive dissonance; Law; Political science; Harmonization; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.014510330160765725,"score_gpt":0.2407778839126342,"score_spread":0.22626755375186847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258680811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9124945,0.000778054,9.3034566e-7,0.00041228265,0.00020468331,0.00030236878,0.00018360268,0.000106205734,0.08551741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983278,0.00025088515,0.00018171052,0.00036616574,0.00012443846,0.000031073127,0.000013855229,0.0000344494,0.0006696416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977223,0.00021766587,0.00036857586,0.0004602277,0.00036094978,0.0008702266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991052,0.00008744624,0.0001418521,0.00015534757,0.00016162227,0.0003485058],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00122161,0.00021684963,0.0002693932,0.00013355688,0.0026438492,0.0002196037,0.0002992276,0.00027405113,0.00007726853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038229927,0.00024283603,0.00004038272,0.0006612843,0.0002717952,0.001204343,0.000058610378,0.00038408203,0.000013658879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062727127,0.00003598185,0.03465274,0.000052597738,0.000005786117,0.000029993244,0.00014518059,0.0000059850445,0.0035662632,0.95334595,0.0000050882963,0.008148131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009205437,0.000069749636,0.13426372,0.00051646045,0.00003438056,0.000018904568,0.0025972608,0.0000659715,0.015997106,0.20785694,0.6363036,0.0013553574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9692752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9811015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74548906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010024555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023170287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99865454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258721558","doi":"","title":"Structure and Relationship in American Federalism: Foundations, Consequences, and \"Basic Principles\" Revisited","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Federalism; Political science; Law and economics; Sovereignty; State (computer science); Politics; Separation of powers; Enumerated powers; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Law; Public administration; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07735576547804769,"score_gpt":0.34149023505342135,"score_spread":0.2641344695753737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258721558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94666904,0.00068788,0.00005415598,0.008907768,0.00006954441,0.00027009894,0.0000055814085,0.000052742693,0.043283165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99825394,0.000068701156,0.0004673816,0.0002976201,0.00008992165,0.000004476566,0.000004889583,0.0000038454923,0.0008092118],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917066,0.00017101961,0.00017000872,0.00016487436,0.00018167264,0.00014176458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999519,0.00011408888,0.00008305665,0.00005934102,0.000089389534,0.00013511907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048704306,0.00006345525,0.00013492646,0.00006166671,0.00030424417,0.00021696172,0.000057239653,0.000048659473,0.000022674234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008548504,0.00005456107,0.000007061686,0.0003985471,0.0006785137,0.00030986528,0.00002297154,0.00008965721,0.000003006349],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004912178,0.0000047633625,0.57524586,0.0000122112915,0.0000029120147,0.00000241653,0.005892597,0.0000021524631,0.000011587879,0.4171309,0.00039749933,0.0012921917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009965601,0.00012059843,0.5719556,0.00013874196,0.000023799288,0.000017955981,0.034707256,0.00010736338,0.000033562083,0.17021532,0.22117709,0.0005061234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057740115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057978164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24691555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006395665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002657459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9592113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258825645","doi":"","title":"Talking Trash with the Supreme Court of Canada: The Reasonable Expectation of PrivacyUnder the Charter","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.006551949007729256,"score_gpt":0.22950072105639718,"score_spread":0.22294877204866792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258825645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95710087,0.0008658253,0.00045209762,0.031758368,0.00025403057,0.00027057942,0.0000013420455,0.000006496609,0.009290389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99846727,0.00012810717,0.000003673686,0.00008538536,0.00046233856,0.0000055251267,2.0841148e-7,0.0000073513415,0.0008401279],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824846,0.00014445717,0.0001832778,0.00007416553,0.0005997336,0.0007499064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991548,0.00016026314,0.00029750465,0.00013056202,0.0002251745,0.000031705542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026166106,0.0000693948,0.00011224649,0.000013852822,0.0009606745,0.000051558778,0.00048099927,0.000037477686,0.000035698828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012252948,0.00002881788,0.00004071592,0.00020726967,0.00025756957,0.00014945195,0.000013707191,0.0008632441,3.5365696e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099974306,0.00006795303,0.01140214,0.000023117836,0.00035320272,0.0000015953304,0.055126436,0.000048687867,0.0037011856,0.9202361,0.0037917686,0.005147836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015463834,0.0006508342,0.046033863,0.00019667421,0.00029563002,0.00028027868,0.57918996,0.00012041768,0.0033842593,0.20325512,0.16445483,0.00059171644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37378743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9686345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.716981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018409087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007839721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259052511","doi":"","title":"Role of the Media and Public Perceptions, The Proceedings of the Canada-United States Law Institute Conference on Multiple Actors in Canada-U.S. Relations: The Role of the Media and Public Perceptions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Media relations; Perception; Media coverage; Media studies; Law; Public relations; Public administration; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.016411777471255936,"score_gpt":0.22173814889375243,"score_spread":0.2053263714224965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259052511","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9585992,0.0004497157,7.9719376e-7,0.037756458,0.0003239722,0.00049475714,0.00044409838,0.000006394149,0.0019245684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983266,0.00049171783,0.000006426719,0.0010022001,0.0000924047,0.000018354596,0.00002205536,0.00001595813,0.000024291958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969743,0.00033442292,0.00067147915,0.00020096013,0.0013127051,0.000506164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969922,0.000695884,0.0006590524,0.000282856,0.0011007509,0.00026928048],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007748529,0.00022387736,0.00029424316,0.000113069524,0.003074785,0.00023293153,0.0012103216,0.00009737546,0.000052467225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016739988,0.00010820039,0.00006091385,0.001671219,0.0018939138,0.00046885447,0.00017307092,0.0008376535,8.698737e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004291337,0.00013328849,0.38837567,0.00007377877,0.00022089898,0.0000031322168,0.09521669,0.0024680533,0.00071268016,0.50686634,0.0051244856,0.00076205016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082528475,0.00003773777,0.26482746,0.00044647322,0.00009960923,0.00002842393,0.586065,0.00072212005,0.00020468578,0.021591237,0.12480538,0.00034656885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99978524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49084833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011108784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011445289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99822307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259606356","doi":"","title":"Critique: A Historian Said Terra Nullius Was An Invention - I'm a Blackfella Lawyer Who Has Serious Concerns about His Lack of Understanding and Knowledge of the Common Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NOVA (University of Newcastle, Australia)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3993850435462904,"score_gpt":0.38363869333881156,"score_spread":0.015746350207478832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259606356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95545495,0.0001329198,0.00007754747,0.00094984414,0.00029425457,0.00027157384,0.000043585296,0.000023290717,0.042752028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954866,0.00007164838,0.000052171777,0.000020271924,0.00010510782,1.5612754e-7,0.0000031446166,0.000008574724,0.0042522885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988628,0.00020263642,0.00021506159,0.00020689648,0.00029511144,0.00021750267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912703,0.00004714389,0.0003164602,0.00018675636,0.00020598853,0.00011661564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003111895,0.00011765704,0.00036139812,0.000072773495,0.0006909995,0.000020519297,0.00031677398,0.00018368353,0.00021822959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019082298,0.00012522054,0.00011295609,0.00036246193,0.002160089,0.00045936572,0.00007565157,0.00014689664,0.0000031891173],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039583677,0.0007019448,0.03627092,0.0011431185,0.0002461114,0.00005884762,0.40587458,0.000030717125,0.0066864276,0.52340245,0.024130074,0.0010589978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008691636,0.002137747,0.09430576,0.0030907446,0.00079059205,0.000074947624,0.29737854,0.00022972978,0.002911026,0.035242092,0.55321044,0.0019367535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22306697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22703542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5290804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027331142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023711925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79589385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260043176","doi":"","title":"Role of the Media and Public Perceptions, The Proceedings of the Canada-United States Law Institute Conference on Multiple Actors in Canada-U.S. Relations: The Role of the Media and Public Perceptions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Media studies; Perception; Media relations; Law; Sociology; Public relations; Public administration; Psychology","score_opus":0.016411777471255936,"score_gpt":0.22173814889375243,"score_spread":0.2053263714224965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260043176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9585992,0.0004497157,7.9719376e-7,0.037756458,0.0003239722,0.00049475714,0.00044409838,0.000006394149,0.0019245684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983266,0.00049171783,0.000006426719,0.0010022001,0.0000924047,0.000018354596,0.00002205536,0.00001595813,0.000024291958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969743,0.00033442292,0.00067147915,0.00020096013,0.0013127051,0.000506164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969922,0.000695884,0.0006590524,0.000282856,0.0011007509,0.00026928048],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007748529,0.00022387736,0.00029424316,0.000113069524,0.003074785,0.00023293153,0.0012103216,0.00009737546,0.000052467225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016739988,0.00010820039,0.00006091385,0.001671219,0.0018939138,0.00046885447,0.00017307092,0.0008376535,8.698737e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004291337,0.00013328849,0.38837567,0.00007377877,0.00022089898,0.0000031322168,0.09521669,0.0024680533,0.00071268016,0.50686634,0.0051244856,0.00076205016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082528475,0.00003773777,0.26482746,0.00044647322,0.00009960923,0.00002842393,0.586065,0.00072212005,0.00020468578,0.021591237,0.12480538,0.00034656885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99978524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49084833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011108784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011445289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99822307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260876279","doi":"","title":"Canadian landmark case: L.C. and the Attorney General for Alberta v. Brian Joseph Mills.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Landmark; Law; Psychology; Political science; Cartography; Geography","score_opus":0.013626670997450008,"score_gpt":0.23267619651414828,"score_spread":0.21904952551669826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260876279","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4910469,0.0018691325,0.000002925549,0.029095493,0.00055843906,0.0022067144,0.000053284748,0.000032598884,0.4751345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9599757,0.00010837478,0.000009276825,0.0010582327,0.0011227267,0.0006409939,0.0000032074497,0.00000891642,0.037072554],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990193,0.00009930596,0.00012708407,0.0001597001,0.000116623356,0.00047798682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993259,0.00018267737,0.000030477884,0.0000928519,0.000041253385,0.0003268786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079893606,0.00007480673,0.00013622483,0.000025661924,0.0009075186,0.0001909495,0.00013236077,0.00007599318,0.00013500646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024869703,0.000052110277,0.000044657423,0.00013460759,0.00018759543,0.000118313554,0.0000072837374,0.000053222753,0.000009672259],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017026583,0.00002485878,0.010655509,0.000053229847,0.00011617879,0.000106736516,0.02472415,0.0000064282367,4.6657638e-7,0.104940526,0.09110775,0.7680939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055369065,0.000003474866,0.0062958673,0.0000026518853,0.000017262551,0.000023529192,0.00028797227,0.000013231813,0.0000014369595,0.0011903443,0.9915146,0.00009592579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98076016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.991823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90040684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008898694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017487351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6979991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261498436","doi":"10.11575/prism/29090","title":"Costs Decision: Gadd v. Director, Central Region, Regional Services, Alberta Environment re: Cardinal River Coals Ltd.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Geography","score_opus":0.026302124616388967,"score_gpt":0.2894077733649567,"score_spread":0.26310564874856773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261498436","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32413355,0.002159836,0.00012756532,0.0049527087,0.00091702805,0.0013154445,0.000035983157,0.000010389317,0.6663475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975344,0.000192391,0.000698824,0.00018927368,0.0011704206,0.000021815717,0.000035038178,0.000017279604,0.022330947],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773717,0.00017813232,0.00035902712,0.0004989359,0.0007065173,0.0005202163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902487,0.00020289278,0.00019772776,0.0002741426,0.0000736648,0.00022669644],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047346717,0.00018098805,0.00030260652,0.000036764766,0.0007267703,0.00040305007,0.0007154119,0.00016230905,0.0028639978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038965503,0.00016582424,0.000095117044,0.0002090607,0.00026967353,0.00056649564,0.00018132836,0.00009363103,0.00069388875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007071634,0.0009987215,0.19366789,0.00006308371,0.00024327092,0.00044605462,0.037763465,0.0002470117,0.0003515377,0.01108951,0.49685594,0.25756633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039898296,0.000028094271,0.013213431,0.00011837519,0.000026938511,0.000006562966,0.0010167022,0.000006390787,0.0000939105,0.00067940017,0.98416597,0.00024527236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27633297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0946464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6512105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003366375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023354737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99804753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262682471","doi":"","title":"The First Issue About Bills of Rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Business; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.004868257513415156,"score_gpt":0.25406772215056356,"score_spread":0.2491994646371484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262682471","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26404804,0.038727786,0.004193145,0.045342874,0.0044259937,0.00077747327,0.0000031068405,0.00014638813,0.6423352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99113417,0.002851656,0.0000043014666,0.00006805944,0.0017337638,0.000002119313,1.1160373e-7,0.000006375226,0.0041994485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782836,0.0001468131,0.00025431832,0.000091269634,0.00039233538,0.0012869218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992688,0.00017958839,0.00022202714,0.00010258316,0.00016013895,0.00006690197],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003903239,0.0000728184,0.00013980952,0.000031945805,0.0018722201,0.000105001396,0.0004206823,0.000065147295,0.00003493897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025002979,0.000042548218,0.00008010477,0.00020101629,0.00021175349,0.00015949775,0.000016323273,0.0005591984,0.000048148162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011193412,0.000017376047,0.0007396764,0.0000040032082,0.000038798833,2.2861022e-7,0.0017944041,0.000003518041,0.000013274916,0.98381513,0.0012879693,0.01227445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104713356,0.00007603273,0.00013750582,0.000018474278,0.000007741956,0.0000051205775,0.0011553589,0.0000035117992,0.00004471964,0.36536783,0.6330284,0.00005060767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014766173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1410957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7270861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023915459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011434777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262710151","doi":"","title":"CAN INSURANCE LAW ACCOMODATE THE UNCERTAINTY ASSOCIATED WITH PRELIMINARY GENETIC INFORMATION","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Insurance law; Flexibility (engineering); Context (archaeology); Actuarial science; Argument (complex analysis); Insurance policy; Interpretation (philosophy); Business; Casualty insurance; Key person insurance; Genetic testing; General insurance; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.006355884415096602,"score_gpt":0.2306101609030274,"score_spread":0.2242542764879308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262710151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9623931,0.0016206356,0.0011050784,0.018477876,0.0002774849,0.00045429548,0.000009469342,0.00008598049,0.015576064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998183,0.0007765278,0.000007007681,0.0006008904,0.00026215042,0.00000990373,0.0000035022692,0.000008023691,0.00014898005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977578,0.00014778084,0.00023571655,0.00008479178,0.00048966316,0.001284236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992972,0.000048174257,0.00026869983,0.00009116409,0.00022174968,0.000073001145],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014900094,0.00010546592,0.00012455614,0.000032886597,0.0015076421,0.00022518061,0.00035390788,0.000076037766,0.00000571666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001408637,0.000066236265,0.000045580186,0.00034687523,0.0002132844,0.00066130713,0.00001755727,0.00086982234,0.00001191506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012012654,0.000062310646,0.0034548112,0.0000074498553,0.00016786563,0.000004799901,0.015106348,0.00601341,0.000008359165,0.96385336,0.0000607134,0.011140442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020881167,0.00112109,0.021093506,0.00021183018,0.00007576989,0.00014351316,0.02655357,0.000029997478,0.000032847554,0.9272597,0.020928044,0.00046205116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038385425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21380442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.175419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012961623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043462366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264183851","doi":"","title":"At the Intersection of North American Free Trade and Same-Sex Marriage","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Isolationism; Economic integration; Globalization; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Politics; Economic globalization; Free trade; Political economy; Sociology; Law; International trade; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.010735404447816115,"score_gpt":0.20946712159040975,"score_spread":0.19873171714259363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264183851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9386214,0.00007002293,0.00019233719,0.00082778634,0.00012808813,0.0001188085,0.000012652774,0.000028125694,0.0600008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99512094,0.000020488193,0.000030585794,0.000024540053,0.00009168434,8.0144254e-8,0.0000014703003,0.000004709883,0.004705491],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992835,0.00003495744,0.00011208823,0.00015943142,0.0002764299,0.0001336186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994323,0.000054857264,0.00021141944,0.00015227785,0.00003644343,0.000112695605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006586753,0.0000748996,0.00016995116,0.000031475236,0.00040882963,0.000044890807,0.00026338352,0.000035083507,0.000006506316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054862627,0.00007085607,0.00007586471,0.00026392858,0.0007889545,0.00047840853,0.00010652801,0.00007009639,0.0000020848754],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075382815,0.0005769586,0.56486917,0.0002335745,0.00051864353,0.0001617965,0.26267624,0.00030915948,0.0026119018,0.018713668,0.013239944,0.13533513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021840783,0.0010389533,0.7795744,0.00020649743,0.0001592454,0.00004248772,0.1304488,0.00001263626,0.0028641871,0.0073403483,0.07551938,0.00060897926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05681167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048878763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21470526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016840515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018338326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9684767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264430798","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2728448","title":"Chapter 6 Legal Aspects of Health Applications of Genomics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill University and Génome Québec Innovation Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Genomics; Biology; Genome; Genetics","score_opus":0.011991529829662614,"score_gpt":0.28415047188281306,"score_spread":0.27215894205315044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264430798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27086276,0.05173853,0.22200614,0.057724953,0.0010343137,0.0024536352,0.00004191668,0.00013160973,0.39400613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935024,0.005151401,0.000024984296,0.000030382496,0.0003337199,0.000005055507,1.4089163e-7,0.0000068945888,0.0009450604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984707,0.00006513745,0.00034858685,0.00008507558,0.00024170223,0.0007887895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992658,0.000034773726,0.0004107671,0.000078636054,0.0001478239,0.000062227715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021122403,0.00005349828,0.00017625172,0.000060359238,0.00025393214,0.000011994034,0.0002124782,0.000038536105,0.000034611196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047364614,0.000037619968,0.00006532562,0.0001301771,0.00013767152,0.00016113884,0.000013092382,0.00020436812,0.000008283452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004976564,0.000020449614,0.00022567208,0.000005789852,0.00002258783,6.609806e-8,0.00048035078,3.264212e-7,0.0005889983,0.9189538,0.000011490508,0.07968554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033293138,0.00024185232,0.00019016789,0.000052926684,0.000010653658,0.000016205471,0.0038902396,3.5667748e-7,0.00054428383,0.7566851,0.23793784,0.00009749435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004763643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012743848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7226396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046573053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004930438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8746385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265053783","doi":"","title":"‘Even a Successful Lawsuit Will Be a Worry’: Law and Community Relations in L. M. Montgomery’s Life and Work","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Lawsuit; Witness; Law; Accident (philosophy); Plot (graphics); Political science; Sociology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01896576532311175,"score_gpt":0.26593464564253544,"score_spread":0.24696888031942368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265053783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9674019,0.009449503,0.000075492986,0.0050742943,0.000078910794,0.00015601497,0.0000016287347,0.000028447106,0.017733773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99160945,0.006643571,0.000015724643,0.00034752718,0.00023213787,0.0000067352407,8.4833107e-7,0.0000114946415,0.0011324782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975681,0.00062450155,0.00027829892,0.00012467754,0.00028624092,0.0011181976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928105,0.00023028915,0.00013360367,0.00009278801,0.0000775954,0.0001846543],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027682828,0.00011185888,0.00022187215,0.000086549066,0.002585629,0.00011358917,0.00020336041,0.000121434605,0.000020309124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000354346,0.00010474054,0.00003717567,0.00046338452,0.000393199,0.00070558104,0.000053436834,0.0022346857,0.0000033597476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089669156,0.00019729324,0.31003115,0.000015337311,0.00009879991,0.000016659986,0.048253182,0.000019216115,0.000011568694,0.6387706,0.00045779897,0.0020387168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002878835,0.00062926736,0.087516546,0.00029576855,0.00007584292,0.00039114922,0.08497461,0.00001976804,0.000004169697,0.6778393,0.1444624,0.00091234606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06589572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37051982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3046241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003678301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016154405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265065212","doi":"","title":"New Brunswick Human Rights Act","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0141904969213125,"score_gpt":0.29372372198909114,"score_spread":0.2795332250677786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265065212","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057018556,0.000080893195,0.00022413634,0.00090427516,0.00019088924,0.00009064074,1.2683972e-7,0.0001419596,0.94134855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84628755,7.005987e-7,0.00011360108,0.00006145587,0.0016554674,5.276339e-7,9.391474e-7,0.0000034602938,0.15187632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992625,0.000033005403,0.00012676668,0.00012135287,0.00024288475,0.00021348707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997407,0.000021003354,0.000038930568,0.00007053639,0.000040082683,0.000088716355],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016693524,0.00005620499,0.00009010661,0.000025013802,0.0008297093,0.00011775002,0.00014683035,0.000050179144,0.0015574249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008364497,0.00004395724,0.00003726712,0.00017380583,0.000052884974,0.00021177746,0.000011497766,0.00004581501,0.00028747483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.114809e-7,0.000012224542,0.0038462677,0.0000020823259,0.0000020912871,0.0000023397158,0.00037600502,4.7707334e-7,0.00005757403,0.92450786,0.07088314,0.00030921178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093764065,0.000011158459,0.0055223997,0.00000611594,0.0000031335321,2.2664223e-7,0.00008333729,2.9423052e-7,0.00032910437,0.07770176,0.91616195,0.000086761735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9215719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81030065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8468061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036039928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028485258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265225572","doi":"","title":"Angoisse Identitaire Et Critique Du Droit. La 'Critique Juridique Identitaire Américaine' Comme Objet Et Source De Réflexion Théorique (Identity, Anguish, and Legal Critique. 'American Identity-Based Critique' as an Object and a Source of Theoretical Reflection)","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Anguish; Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.008733067921432837,"score_gpt":0.3352515685027662,"score_spread":0.32651850058133336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265225572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77050394,0.014496475,0.15733507,0.045431793,0.00064847496,0.00087956,0.00003496274,0.00022976038,0.010439984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96758837,0.025218993,0.000394801,0.0042604287,0.0009227869,0.00006509551,0.000012923693,0.00017815962,0.0013584606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98404926,0.00873676,0.0014793898,0.0010716968,0.001376086,0.003286801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954458,0.0009080808,0.0008848062,0.00046501358,0.001347784,0.0009485072],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017424189,0.0008370025,0.0013039686,0.00058136706,0.001739656,0.0022421728,0.0008830029,0.0008028579,0.000092472874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004535848,0.0009516271,0.00048136484,0.0015689103,0.003576737,0.0066069616,0.00019925089,0.004650102,0.000010020686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021383085,0.0007656793,0.004170934,0.00045394973,0.00023614532,0.00021553693,0.0054981094,0.000036034537,0.00070881104,0.986269,0.00031242933,0.0011195526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014459402,0.0025043404,0.00087128655,0.0010791201,0.00035527916,0.0055681705,0.04123424,0.00014028064,0.0008169235,0.9349679,0.009931901,0.0010846392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13622718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23421589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19708443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018087619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013495231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265345618","doi":"10.5623/cig2013-041","title":"Geomatics and the Law: <i>Hartley v. Cunningham:</i> Trees as Common Property","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GEOMATICA","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geomatics; Property (philosophy); Sociology; Law; Geography; Philosophy; Epistemology; Political science; Cartography","score_opus":0.011090147186481505,"score_gpt":0.2581819669303814,"score_spread":0.24709181974389993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265345618","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2070097,0.00064893556,0.000032997425,0.02900834,0.00021181373,0.0011831139,0.0000023150237,0.00015699212,0.7617458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922349,0.00007082526,0.00012581455,0.0018865216,0.0002598381,0.00010414711,0.0000011413579,0.000011411604,0.0053054425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986451,0.00022489963,0.00028059445,0.00014731866,0.00038066207,0.00032138653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913615,0.00032038588,0.00011298505,0.00020071959,0.00010219914,0.00012756429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007523906,0.00011596293,0.00025723016,0.000017789209,0.0010433892,0.00047555193,0.00027574136,0.00007957076,0.00040662274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032987742,0.00005660365,0.00004665632,0.00014849784,0.00095723965,0.0003690454,0.00008109378,0.00011421127,0.00061364437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020378337,0.00008204805,0.002074092,0.00013644759,0.00005760053,0.0000043794976,0.061616667,0.000002869275,0.00008662888,0.8889409,0.034632087,0.012345934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015000819,0.000106488944,0.0020830687,0.0002720954,0.0000876684,0.000013769074,0.0208858,0.0007033474,0.0001573063,0.3581175,0.6155813,0.0004916395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13340552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009816948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78522515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019007393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007390354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8723652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266687343","doi":"","title":"Rule 11(E)(1)(C) and the Sentencing Guidelines: Bargaining Outside the Heartland?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Conviction; Sentence; Sentencing guidelines; Law; Guideline; Political science; Economic Justice; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02250927074885195,"score_gpt":0.3019852667799017,"score_spread":0.2794759960310497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266687343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56287646,0.06936594,0.011073259,0.12589538,0.0021081234,0.0012973066,0.0000022334132,0.00018263709,0.22719866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917169,0.005132983,0.000031432526,0.00091498555,0.000949591,0.000005330552,1.3525802e-7,0.000011158732,0.0012374494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971583,0.00056324835,0.00032613936,0.00013423138,0.00041531684,0.0014027688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991949,0.00025301072,0.0001627838,0.00010710425,0.00020350647,0.00007868401],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011124881,0.00010629907,0.0001741806,0.000033217373,0.002352314,0.00028264857,0.00025484763,0.000056114503,0.000021281805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016044393,0.000053035117,0.00008427519,0.00023840493,0.0002944732,0.00021022768,0.000024513116,0.00085891027,0.000010326951],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014554204,0.000005958582,0.0038408425,0.000001970892,0.000046974605,0.0000016498451,0.005701243,0.000016081489,0.000013831589,0.98634785,0.0004967836,0.0035122302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011439763,0.000042642045,0.00012572283,0.000050717612,0.000049915587,0.00029161933,0.14945284,0.000055408404,0.000018596793,0.6309189,0.21767418,0.00017545717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02211627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056859214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4288405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021805527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002365269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267723364","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court's Compassionate Judge: Charter Jurisprudence in the Cory Years","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Charter; Political science; Doctrine; Honour; Power (physics); Sociology","score_opus":0.013631953678877958,"score_gpt":0.29142958070463143,"score_spread":0.27779762702575345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267723364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.840367,0.017345753,0.0006015333,0.08222809,0.0017107788,0.0006510065,0.0000019163206,0.00006631478,0.057027575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859015,0.010107367,0.000001646385,0.00040673127,0.00090343074,0.000009629237,3.227194e-7,0.000008374448,0.0026610433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99680656,0.0004489447,0.00025748345,0.00013028052,0.0006803019,0.0016764109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993365,0.00023806121,0.0001411339,0.0001314684,0.000089075314,0.000063765445],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062540015,0.0000926089,0.00012794785,0.00004306363,0.001321874,0.00028895182,0.0007938181,0.00006860608,0.000039894745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014993835,0.000052981315,0.00007369266,0.00037482238,0.00022115502,0.000284668,0.000023940827,0.0013843573,0.00006764317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111079564,0.0001339735,0.01946658,0.000004263488,0.00006844304,0.00006010861,0.018240567,0.000017993718,0.00007676573,0.9043362,0.0094424775,0.04804151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004148531,0.00011072642,0.01824797,0.000039930484,0.000013633368,0.00014857622,0.030147186,0.000023833009,0.0000023727523,0.20398384,0.7467004,0.00016664175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040149097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06844845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73725796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043167075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019538947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268350524","doi":"","title":"An Appeal to Reason: A Review of Roy B. Flemming, Tournament of Appeals: Granting Judicial Review in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Political science; Judicial review; Discretion; Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.02451983910168061,"score_gpt":0.35151441312121506,"score_spread":0.32699457401953447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268350524","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000017738379,0.9949571,0.000030314579,0.0005453878,0.0003001221,0.0015047194,0.000017890665,0.000008542009,0.0026181713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008258426,0.99768686,0.000021712865,0.00034116843,0.0009441724,0.00003915525,0.000011061702,0.000045821445,0.00008422634],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913611,0.0014480425,0.0027619998,0.00042743425,0.0015832196,0.0024182426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995974,0.00013495945,0.0027812307,0.00033016983,0.00044006048,0.00033956382],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0083024865,0.0004488858,0.003688936,0.00024177703,0.0003382756,0.000026285963,0.0012301834,0.00018020136,0.000056383305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00099528,0.00037550772,0.00058733753,0.0016631616,0.00009162491,0.00022127127,0.000065911925,0.0021246371,0.000005049857],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051353913,0.000055952707,0.000041106483,0.074535444,0.00012797173,0.000022924283,0.00020574433,5.6846926e-7,1.01447526e-7,0.003301491,0.0018433575,0.9198602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008218643,0.00012044399,0.0000013761392,0.3437372,0.00023865749,0.00015437038,0.0005337018,1.140151e-7,1.18608945e-7,0.00034624335,0.6545305,0.00025501315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89341134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96279633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9196052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052491715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08382891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269229896","doi":"","title":"Empty Ritual, Mechanical Exercise or the Discipline of Deference?: Revisiting the Standard of Review in Administrative Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Standard of review; Sophistication; Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Administrative law; Doctrine; Political science; Judicial review; Transparency (behavior); State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.040744062725474955,"score_gpt":0.3629541067238302,"score_spread":0.3222100439983553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269229896","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18771827,0.57582784,0.004140723,0.09699751,0.0010055007,0.005405625,0.0000764295,0.00007445712,0.12875363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.935892,0.06366373,0.00002048284,0.000072015326,0.00014189193,0.0000065705426,3.083784e-7,0.0000062718345,0.00019673118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973097,0.00066214823,0.00059574435,0.000120466735,0.00052358623,0.0007883432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988621,0.0002751622,0.00045987585,0.00013323543,0.0002202266,0.000049434737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009047035,0.00009927659,0.00039059747,0.000019726254,0.00051604566,0.00003962191,0.00041017152,0.000055812343,0.000089483234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010844492,0.000043179472,0.000108867025,0.00047690136,0.00028686548,0.00015105598,0.000026617903,0.00087503775,0.0000013120816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007883936,0.00002265503,0.00011558484,0.00009682708,0.000024220411,0.0000013610404,0.0019542265,8.615855e-7,0.000016517868,0.99024385,0.000037834696,0.007407235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010739563,0.0011298286,0.0001031366,0.008317051,0.0002597248,0.000100553225,0.10031478,0.0000039568868,0.0009262515,0.8150922,0.07231485,0.00036371977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011840805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03575666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7481737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021651348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038072416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9818383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270540995","doi":"","title":"The Criminal Justice Principles of Charles Hamilton Houston: Lessons in Innovation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Baltimore law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Defense attorney; Sociology; Criminology; History; Politics","score_opus":0.05072771945486774,"score_gpt":0.3032486934254714,"score_spread":0.25252097397060363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270540995","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20947409,0.09749986,0.00043035694,0.012985447,0.00042569835,0.0016884776,0.000045234377,0.00008438189,0.67736644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96730447,0.03164135,0.00013157452,0.00009083412,0.00006708921,3.639641e-7,0.0000049658356,0.0000033686777,0.0007560005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991577,0.00012620167,0.00023918289,0.00010296698,0.00023938352,0.00013451447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921465,0.00009859904,0.0002966819,0.00010860891,0.0002644607,0.000017013459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072470197,0.000057514895,0.00021859973,0.00003570065,0.00038733636,0.000009400886,0.0002568709,0.000046848894,0.000025211102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000095689145,0.00004988129,0.000045725505,0.0005804623,0.00043876143,0.00015309261,0.00003060817,0.000071588605,0.0000037634895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008204969,0.000038544837,0.00025457348,0.0017741629,0.0000040073323,0.000002757771,0.0010815539,0.0000070433084,0.000025120116,0.99295056,0.0004842209,0.003369245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013996544,0.000027096938,0.0020283067,0.0022660454,0.00012577354,4.7894673e-7,0.0033193822,0.000008057261,0.00005656973,0.00065643986,0.9912839,0.00008797551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07006418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058822565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99229413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005404774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013876449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9583515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274038361","doi":"","title":"One More Brick in the Wall: The Impact of Personal Jurisdiction of Ex Juris Defendants on the Relationship Between the United States and Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Personal jurisdiction; Ex parte; Law; Brick; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Engineering; Civil engineering","score_opus":0.054840712301713175,"score_gpt":0.30804286064676156,"score_spread":0.2532021483450484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274038361","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98507077,0.00029405058,0.0000023932025,0.010472718,0.000057302197,0.00032459557,0.000051378534,0.000007566134,0.003719214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993298,0.000033829736,0.00000167039,0.0003430511,0.00016780023,0.000010206164,0.000009252978,0.0000066831094,0.00009770692],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809444,0.0006795816,0.0002485746,0.00011500136,0.0006609642,0.00020142553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976627,0.0017350112,0.00019420021,0.00017682223,0.00015366772,0.000077564735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020609947,0.00009216162,0.0001523611,0.00003071301,0.0005534661,0.00007403966,0.00035067665,0.000059738108,0.000016631908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00080076366,0.00004070405,0.00004660637,0.00055264484,0.00040554427,0.00012905298,0.00002726073,0.0003068356,0.0000024840176],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003662373,0.000036749945,0.9301152,0.000013894823,0.000049007987,7.24894e-7,0.0419514,0.0001032322,0.000004096407,0.020607766,0.006969343,0.00011191254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022035663,0.00009030506,0.9598037,0.00006993894,0.00003008118,5.8443214e-7,0.024580196,0.000052862528,0.000017191847,0.006154044,0.008900187,0.0000805761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9889533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89437205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09458122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014464666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067930855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42568696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274860673","doi":"","title":"Considering the Evidence, No Wonder the Court Upheld Canada's Regulation of Cigarette Advertising","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Policy & Marketing","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wonder; Advertising; Political science; Law; Business; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03264630197409187,"score_gpt":0.30203551557208497,"score_spread":0.2693892135979931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274860673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65968204,0.004169007,0.00034370503,0.2844802,0.0012849252,0.0003323555,0.0000031738382,0.000022978018,0.049681578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996294,0.00013639167,0.000052213407,0.0010651295,0.0022404625,0.0000013607097,9.364582e-8,0.000009725007,0.00020057724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720603,0.0005484981,0.00067187275,0.000097070035,0.001096901,0.0003796147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99605227,0.0015182974,0.0010702384,0.00014708363,0.0010787158,0.00013338363],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010202152,0.00009976422,0.00022369853,0.00010419237,0.0009040722,0.0002349935,0.00046829716,0.000066307985,0.000066167326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022863533,0.00006002688,0.00012278424,0.00062330917,0.0002655665,0.000707291,0.00006012774,0.00031409904,6.3984294e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007308916,0.00030067263,0.17371288,0.0011577716,0.002161805,0.00014613463,0.0827053,0.0067618666,0.011599301,0.33861363,0.20121644,0.18089329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016391705,0.00015533426,0.32929465,0.006821606,0.00026783065,0.00025085916,0.03421485,0.00020911513,0.0008152917,0.024907295,0.6006226,0.0008013643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57773584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.306742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39940616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005598114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008048847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99757457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275355198","doi":"","title":"Scarred Epistemologies: What a Theolog y of the Cross Has to Say about the Gay Marriage Ban","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intersections Canadian Journal of Music","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.03686937369963159,"score_gpt":0.2859495322431794,"score_spread":0.24908015854354784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275355198","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94283575,0.0010175988,0.00014108393,0.022092061,0.0069822143,0.00030162797,0.000018198085,0.000009915193,0.026601555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99652445,0.000009760113,0.000011085085,0.0006943504,0.0009783715,0.00000578398,1.9665391e-7,0.000008435766,0.0017675627],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985801,0.00029751816,0.0004422867,0.00010504724,0.00025876448,0.00031630896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870425,0.00017717095,0.00033653705,0.00019582508,0.00039206294,0.00019413081],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010596175,0.0000944406,0.00019013388,0.00017012385,0.001349609,0.00052484276,0.0007107809,0.00008794321,0.00032556543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005808966,0.000056084344,0.00020900948,0.000615509,0.0009608992,0.0003876763,0.00002526702,0.00024546016,0.0000102871445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018141604,0.0001611584,0.1302968,0.000121033525,0.0005300863,0.0002160781,0.42502826,0.0044799307,0.0016800973,0.109019235,0.31055927,0.017726632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000582242,0.00029751213,0.14910124,0.0011229782,0.00010359908,0.00023482325,0.16249819,0.000009470537,0.0006687888,0.01844916,0.66655254,0.00037948633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53512645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9402117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4050853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002866663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001664633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275514020","doi":"","title":"Immigration Law - Alien Denied Entry to Another Country and Returned Involuntarily to United States, Not \"Found In\" United States","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deportation; Law; Alien; Statute; Immigration; Political science; Immigration law; Lawsuit; Federal law; Conviction; Legislation; Citizenship; Politics","score_opus":0.017414930757544828,"score_gpt":0.2883466331919541,"score_spread":0.2709317024344092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275514020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44303843,0.0301447,0.0037738378,0.42634743,0.0016170569,0.012050643,0.0014005835,0.000700142,0.08092717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94337285,0.003189302,0.0001726859,0.051843118,0.00014369845,0.00009851817,0.00084724254,0.00002559111,0.00030697483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976073,0.00042869349,0.00054978515,0.00036202447,0.00070312223,0.00034909355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875873,0.00031517746,0.00011143902,0.00014408022,0.00045865314,0.00021191368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015261554,0.00020189988,0.00038418063,0.00015576447,0.00038347536,0.0001792938,0.00022804514,0.00011142125,0.0001330261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013868435,0.0001857439,0.00004315405,0.0016245215,0.00016737069,0.0003917461,0.000019234687,0.00013694813,0.000022054262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045516244,0.00004745689,0.000273917,0.00064633536,0.000020515152,0.0000016465274,0.003586239,0.000133546,0.000032517168,0.99396116,0.0010418412,0.0002093226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039180627,0.00006937941,0.00064201956,0.00085826864,0.000037131,8.468122e-7,0.0002635614,0.000089791945,0.000026125286,0.006115353,0.99124277,0.00026297107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.101579845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3416742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9902009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016193418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013822783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9044028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276392976","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review Standards for Interest Arbitration Awards Under the Employee Free Choice Act","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"USF Scholarship Repository (University of San Francisco)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Appeal; Statute; Compulsory arbitration; Judicial review; Presumption; Political science; Negotiation; Legislature; Law; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.05319719207445227,"score_gpt":0.301760431959914,"score_spread":0.2485632398854617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276392976","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9274001,0.012656569,0.0025555415,0.0036487614,0.001383705,0.0015169148,0.00009242004,0.00016330443,0.05058266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971121,0.0008480021,0.00014776933,0.0004848871,0.0006600473,0.0000027372223,0.000005239082,0.000014901252,0.0007243218],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997904,0.00035051708,0.00027385724,0.0003130934,0.00085190404,0.00030659974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980895,0.000260341,0.00032826804,0.0003900187,0.00078718865,0.00014467373],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016024511,0.00015414803,0.00035740025,0.000058140788,0.0033467382,0.00009138971,0.00087368226,0.00018110793,0.000087776854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006635389,0.00014681485,0.00021312841,0.00041557633,0.0008329713,0.0011059343,0.000085093365,0.00035380002,0.00000781269],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018548525,0.0012216964,0.39047113,0.008021294,0.0016534746,0.00035972297,0.097190164,0.0000756312,0.017018212,0.10406617,0.3607946,0.017273072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027470118,0.00065504224,0.31058767,0.003839064,0.00057136384,0.00003801459,0.011489537,0.000010016262,0.001536933,0.008293673,0.65916073,0.0010709468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010151261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018055314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29836613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002634391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012610997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278908142","doi":"","title":"J(TR): Time to Remove Religion From the Oath","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Oath; Witness; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0065677045471131835,"score_gpt":0.24790843827024628,"score_spread":0.24134073372313308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278908142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47302917,0.013681499,0.011820582,0.30525464,0.0017439288,0.0009358494,0.000022511573,0.00026539667,0.19324641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707165,0.0022992664,0.000014463813,0.0007996834,0.002831281,0.0000031094607,3.4471006e-7,0.00001327051,0.023322115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755603,0.0002056397,0.00020166158,0.00016036796,0.0004428021,0.0014334928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999295,0.00020894235,0.00012000801,0.00013091665,0.00011686889,0.00012826473],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023650893,0.00009077666,0.00012853803,0.000028652485,0.0007830978,0.00012424696,0.0004632599,0.00007456693,0.00025689867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005214151,0.000046286073,0.000078757155,0.00021916995,0.00007649094,0.00024107043,0.000033570752,0.0004550687,0.0016316196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001834492,0.0000686209,0.0024750584,0.0000019930997,0.00020634332,0.00000992535,0.009399853,0.0000030455333,0.00703107,0.6612356,0.06843783,0.25094724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022233358,0.000119298864,0.0002810235,0.000063911604,0.000015584932,0.00001157769,0.0014428323,5.667772e-7,0.00006692618,0.40388086,0.59376675,0.00012830822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012998958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020654317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52532893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078267744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002265966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99914575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279006159","doi":"","title":"Follow the North Star: Canada as a Model to Increase the Independence, Integrity and Efficiency of the U.S. Immigration Adjudication System","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Immigration; Independence (probability theory); Star (game theory); Political science; Geography; Law; Physics; Astrophysics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.012650915798952493,"score_gpt":0.2307023007858504,"score_spread":0.2180513849868979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279006159","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904723,0.0009222286,0.0012350507,0.0029918533,0.00016299494,0.00038386873,0.0000040325826,0.0000089019195,0.0038187322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991396,0.00025336107,0.0000057043267,0.00014403753,0.00012513775,0.000012422702,2.628321e-7,0.0000053201356,0.0003141501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979523,0.00031927286,0.0002588417,0.00012295209,0.0007033525,0.00064331735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991551,0.000063135965,0.00027076868,0.00016044425,0.00027157564,0.00007896081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030113722,0.00008692348,0.00011693953,0.0000272626,0.0012982589,0.00005386608,0.0005883499,0.00005306511,0.0000041197895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030491521,0.000041123632,0.000047141606,0.0004188583,0.00013071131,0.00016024741,0.000047979956,0.0009424551,0.0000012622953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011312055,0.00005929743,0.036373053,0.000025234325,0.000099607634,0.0000012108818,0.03324396,0.00010609711,0.00007758434,0.9246082,0.00037918598,0.0049134665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017096011,0.0011113989,0.097487405,0.0005933476,0.00061799167,0.0003309052,0.547969,0.009927277,0.0006839494,0.3283858,0.009971856,0.0012114885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9434766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59622234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000737589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013732837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2280291964","doi":"","title":"Re) Constructing Judicial Ethics in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Accountability; Generality; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Judicial independence; State (computer science); Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.027952814325779538,"score_gpt":0.24230421124752666,"score_spread":0.21435139692174712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2280291964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7898624,0.000023989747,0.000014355543,0.012307217,0.000986897,0.00013319522,0.000017970053,0.000016367787,0.19663763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992974,0.000008145906,0.0001782619,0.000055937868,0.000078599136,9.344e-8,5.1011784e-7,0.000004225945,0.00037683753],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986677,0.00034490667,0.00011933804,0.00014022824,0.00049176137,0.00023602058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989992,0.0003021468,0.00015963792,0.00023902401,0.0002062301,0.00009376569],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012969553,0.000068634086,0.00016339018,0.000060438175,0.001344075,0.00008280821,0.0007627202,0.000159535,0.00012568285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009204213,0.00007095377,0.000055959605,0.0005968897,0.0005067799,0.0006498539,0.00014423305,0.0014692445,0.000005439082],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003126238,0.00003939208,0.8245472,0.00003207884,0.000028202627,0.00002352763,0.068371445,0.000008016685,0.001726223,0.099397294,0.0025329893,0.0032623806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056781666,0.000015731091,0.08825712,0.00014440334,0.000032772936,0.0000024680116,0.6955643,0.00001758407,0.00020076934,0.0077507035,0.20710719,0.00033910086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99363065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73629004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021346101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003619643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283363849","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1310","title":"Of Banks, Federalism and Clear Statement Rules: Bank of Montreal v. Marcotte","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Doctrine; Supreme court; Statement (logic); Political science; New Federalism; Statutory law; Statutory interpretation; Cooperative federalism; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Law; Dual federalism; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.04504876488770859,"score_gpt":0.32404270331181456,"score_spread":0.27899393842410597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283363849","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047291156,0.5501456,0.00005993692,0.017346691,0.0006292027,0.0025024405,0.00013387988,0.00010118727,0.38178986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93767273,0.060835082,0.00018445571,0.0006096793,0.00014142034,0.000016001817,0.000007479016,0.000013725675,0.00051941845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828935,0.0002477598,0.00053907506,0.00017231968,0.0005368512,0.00021462743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989805,0.00005241854,0.00027405113,0.00016365312,0.00036072597,0.00016860542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00171211,0.00010891982,0.0005010903,0.00001837671,0.000119840406,0.000030758205,0.00018471513,0.00005585735,0.00011289597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017762002,0.00008961508,0.00007036216,0.00013625433,0.0002921808,0.00022762112,0.00005845286,0.000066087996,0.000014358618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008606187,0.00021930544,0.0018305511,0.013334815,0.00016139225,0.000012137522,0.010079861,0.0000015856308,0.00005758322,0.85682493,0.08648626,0.03090554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027806615,0.00012424128,0.00019712803,0.0021720608,0.000067197536,9.067943e-7,0.0004043056,0.0000026287405,0.000037471087,0.005113079,0.99147505,0.00012784103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07404669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011426731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9049888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043661646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021668809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9321193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285547032","doi":"","title":"Sexual predator laws in Canada.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Predator; Psychology; Criminology; Law; Political science; Biology; Ecology; Predation","score_opus":0.0270717790487623,"score_gpt":0.23996036371587892,"score_spread":0.21288858466711663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285547032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77681655,0.00023639649,0.0000027871904,0.0031439934,0.00046072522,0.00039343548,0.0000041691446,0.000029280194,0.21891269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99357563,0.000018685207,0.0000019202823,0.00026256035,0.00038240425,0.00022911116,7.154456e-7,0.0000040181403,0.0055249394],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990962,0.000055521068,0.00011777837,0.00011314906,0.00025766002,0.00035965137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999719,0.000036304045,0.000031949327,0.00005952576,0.000027720505,0.00012548463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003675683,0.00004306542,0.00008702543,0.000022227938,0.00011214111,0.000037283524,0.00013791432,0.00003257841,0.00004993065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020033059,0.000041195653,0.000007229756,0.00029064174,0.000032327294,0.00014890873,0.000014707177,0.000057514415,0.00000672063],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002210574,0.00004651289,0.7582579,0.000020290157,0.000012075912,0.00008215128,0.003612156,0.000011685783,0.0000025953236,0.007939703,0.02909789,0.20089492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010965651,0.0000014122566,0.3125145,0.0000021408944,0.0000015648204,5.092135e-7,0.0022832688,0.0000020836808,0.0000059382055,0.00026710102,0.68473524,0.00007657029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.997298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99979603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6556373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038803756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008744374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.167991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288254698","doi":"","title":"Canada v. United States of America","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.009069578412270709,"score_gpt":0.2369884345714382,"score_spread":0.2279188561591675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288254698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7681047,0.0021634032,0.002949036,0.058657512,0.0059106136,0.0009058089,0.0016223161,0.00018454892,0.1595021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914006,0.00034027657,0.00007531806,0.006990245,0.00042264556,0.0000026492621,0.00013451712,0.00002341603,0.00061032403],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970947,0.0004614281,0.00055833603,0.00016887586,0.0010648189,0.00065183593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973083,0.0004336329,0.00048432578,0.00015805013,0.0009844017,0.00063128205],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062110595,0.00018658595,0.0003598901,0.00016365573,0.0014533205,0.00014629304,0.00047270415,0.00006730252,0.00025610114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039625526,0.0001669287,0.0000489187,0.001268206,0.0003676379,0.00019228723,0.000032865217,0.00038782333,0.0000014150567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009739163,0.00009610751,0.0038465755,0.00018698962,0.00037686632,0.00025813916,0.010425673,0.014848642,0.000059750913,0.07281872,0.8893579,0.0076271957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002469795,0.00005996739,0.00012371349,0.00006813762,0.000023532175,0.000009416015,0.012538335,0.0007376133,0.00008004753,0.0013743392,0.9845182,0.00021975016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99997336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22329594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006908345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055047446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289530266","doi":"","title":"Marriage: Legal Aspects","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.00664601981876684,"score_gpt":0.264095510572992,"score_spread":0.2574494907542252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289530266","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19854875,0.0046490342,0.00019369916,0.005221042,0.0005047881,0.00014907995,9.76693e-7,0.000098577984,0.79063404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9489798,0.004376375,0.000009619987,0.0001852712,0.0024905764,0.000002601073,4.567245e-7,0.000013443096,0.043941833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99677634,0.00015345031,0.00022557439,0.00015156435,0.0004684302,0.0022246523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957544,0.000029598781,0.00008011499,0.00008542422,0.00007910177,0.00015035033],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022874528,0.00010240672,0.00015052294,0.00005032306,0.0010546662,0.00024654617,0.00032938598,0.00008960747,0.0016765207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009928526,0.000090959635,0.00009455234,0.00029272813,0.000102088015,0.0005341528,0.000009082076,0.0011238254,0.0003977294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024471014,0.00003211051,0.00022888639,0.0000022530323,0.000040705654,0.000013394899,0.0010205914,0.000005568433,0.000025156247,0.9084533,0.00083469664,0.089318864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026282054,0.00010464395,0.00013314045,0.000013656466,0.000013869987,0.00010303366,0.0032343345,0.000002015711,0.000014842706,0.38241,0.613564,0.0001436245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010950677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036454104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75043106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073449383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004947427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296872476","doi":"","title":"Should the Law Society of Upper Canada Give Its Blessing to Trinity Western University Law School","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blessing; Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.06374453824057522,"score_gpt":0.28782632109302614,"score_spread":0.22408178285245092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296872476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26337448,0.0009209922,0.0059999814,0.048254266,0.0012452307,0.0012237146,0.00039626448,0.000117413765,0.67846763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961704,0.00001552678,0.0001307691,0.0014048363,0.00032504945,0.000003182854,0.000005661069,0.0000032071591,0.0019413778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989551,0.00010201939,0.00016120986,0.00014562602,0.00045464715,0.00018140377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863774,0.00016943108,0.000104877014,0.00008963183,0.0007879068,0.00021040005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075119303,0.00006753537,0.00013419625,0.000017243474,0.0008392705,0.000053367272,0.00025314285,0.000086883556,0.00002700522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041909862,0.00006785074,0.000058920443,0.00034235936,0.00038229683,0.00031125295,0.00004194917,0.00013512085,0.000012942888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008648159,0.00002032199,0.0035128284,0.000025476076,0.000021457456,0.0000026771484,0.002705467,0.00066653837,0.000025777399,0.9902837,0.0026917525,0.00003529975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060977833,0.000015809423,0.0026133945,0.00019212316,0.00004510395,0.000009399577,0.01642786,0.0001536536,0.0002606676,0.008877761,0.97054565,0.0002488036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70060325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84845513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.981406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011905849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050575966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89719594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297903105","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2749212","title":"Has the Supreme Court of Canada Rejected 'Originalism'?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Majority opinion","score_opus":0.0132876229293175,"score_gpt":0.25088194590505614,"score_spread":0.23759432297573863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297903105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.688793,0.010541813,0.003111077,0.21801738,0.0026963835,0.0005936897,0.000020122301,0.000083390085,0.07614312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912847,0.0012284833,0.0000030046879,0.00009643937,0.0007938372,0.000002157872,1.456817e-7,0.000008223728,0.006583001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735993,0.00020083318,0.00024781862,0.00009959437,0.0006191447,0.0014726492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991643,0.00014943877,0.00021725113,0.00010680677,0.0002740546,0.00008817784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002515124,0.000080806654,0.00014313388,0.00002774839,0.0009051092,0.000055255423,0.0004303516,0.000050362934,0.00009813652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000366616,0.00004148112,0.00005580481,0.00022462997,0.00022858934,0.00017831274,0.000015188407,0.0004404783,0.000004366086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051206793,0.000026635023,0.0048793405,0.0000067755227,0.00014907918,0.000004897561,0.0024497202,0.0000020178218,0.0009779197,0.9673409,0.015734516,0.008377007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004895217,0.00013285266,0.0009720151,0.00007810716,0.00003325154,0.00005316706,0.009560279,0.0000012419641,0.00040676267,0.24278522,0.74530643,0.00018115844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8103176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9844544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72957194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012280771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028837595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.976668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298045547","doi":"","title":"Gender Essentialism and American Law: Why and How to Sever the Connection","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of gender law & policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Washington and Lee University","keywords":"Transsexual; Transgender; Gender dysphoria; Gender Identity Disorder; Psychology; Transvestism; Conviction; Medicalization; Identity (music); Essentialism; Law enforcement; Misdemeanor; Obligation; Law; Lesbian; Dehumanization; Social psychology; Criminology; Psychiatry; Sociology; Gender identity; Gender studies; Psychoanalysis; Political science","score_opus":0.054564147899543114,"score_gpt":0.3350831900351788,"score_spread":0.28051904213563567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298045547","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5794387,0.003022969,0.0014287346,0.1480892,0.0014642979,0.000490472,0.000013572435,0.00005078292,0.26600128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896298,0.00013572686,0.00007542143,0.0072442056,0.002636229,0.0000018661578,1.9105462e-7,0.000010975871,0.0002655801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987358,0.00024838312,0.00018562106,0.00012103055,0.00045412977,0.00025503576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988937,0.00006921801,0.00024864747,0.00008422863,0.0003310519,0.00037317193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009950994,0.000102317346,0.00021815972,0.000067277775,0.0004767818,0.0003484678,0.00015279753,0.00005279317,0.0000071053287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020739752,0.00006985659,0.00004698709,0.00029001813,0.0004686581,0.0004236809,0.00005038856,0.00014698629,0.0000029691519],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004067671,0.000024120141,0.00067693595,0.000015716141,0.00008616414,0.00001052169,0.05581496,0.000009275755,0.0002319651,0.9211051,0.020436952,0.0015476351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034553555,0.00010649994,0.0009958555,0.000012049764,0.00004261535,0.000084151055,0.024943277,0.000003251442,0.000111612935,0.02000485,0.95321494,0.00013535524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.067254394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009851159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.932778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008268311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029956008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93895686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298650376","doi":"","title":"\"The Wal-Mart Way\": Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Social Change, and the Canadian Legal Landscape","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography; Business","score_opus":0.03141266923292917,"score_gpt":0.3181969658712287,"score_spread":0.2867842966382995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298650376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020403045,0.45885092,0.000001619513,0.018052312,0.0009888567,0.0013279382,0.000038399634,0.000041343166,0.5186583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90376705,0.09194768,0.0000021515016,0.0025418247,0.001398767,0.000051702715,0.000017894907,0.000014642987,0.00025826698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979049,0.00018599925,0.0005222161,0.00023318901,0.0005577148,0.0005959579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989349,0.00014086188,0.00027311064,0.00017460779,0.00019859897,0.00027789804],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040472043,0.0001973561,0.0004859116,0.000029114464,0.0030386809,0.00018901748,0.00032036527,0.00011316472,0.000025127856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007710672,0.00010315031,0.00011367493,0.00025247532,0.0014413833,0.00034415987,0.00007860914,0.0002769423,0.00000879518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019656407,0.000013047766,0.000113551476,0.0010180083,0.000021069705,0.0000017312618,0.0020260317,2.4177584e-9,2.5101545e-7,0.93750465,0.0027692178,0.056512784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034130822,0.000027152917,0.00047565144,0.0011151229,0.00005184402,0.0000031552527,0.0004151999,0.000001018794,0.0000026515447,0.0013680798,0.99604213,0.00015667942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7330285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95514977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9932729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014189348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023423394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99825925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2305552948","doi":"10.21991/c90w9b","title":"RIGHTS, RECOGNITION, AND RECTIFICATION: CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES IN JOHNSON V. SAND","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Rectification; Constitutional law; Law; Political science; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.06385283455441237,"score_gpt":0.27573461441026664,"score_spread":0.21188177985585427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2305552948","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024007991,0.0058599007,0.026173241,0.006746592,0.004319247,0.0016980986,0.0004115161,0.00045966968,0.9303237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996795,0.0005535173,0.0011939358,0.00049600675,0.00036605037,0.00015010384,0.00010136265,0.000006901646,0.0003370973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970111,0.00019165593,0.0007743221,0.00065268826,0.00061443355,0.0007558004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835676,0.00021997304,0.00025067208,0.00022273099,0.0006154539,0.00033442318],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009799189,0.00031600147,0.00040284192,0.0004115646,0.002762069,0.00014884498,0.00028518558,0.0003351884,0.00076929166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009257776,0.00031515965,0.00011065664,0.000734948,0.018893208,0.001478885,0.000090783076,0.0003470656,0.00027889886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007877353,0.0001371102,0.023946168,0.000024213998,0.0000386699,0.00003156361,0.0011147977,0.0000054610055,0.00006340436,0.96972024,0.0034957633,0.0013438144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018053262,0.000075988464,0.003213662,0.0005506207,0.00006566853,0.00022492974,0.0053742947,0.000021915435,0.000664997,0.34431383,0.6428074,0.00088130275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008911543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010014151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.972787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003250816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022911637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2310374476","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1353","title":"Book Notes: The Majesty of the Law: Reflections of a Supreme Court Justice, by Sandra Day O'Connor","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; O'Connor","score_opus":0.02361246546314408,"score_gpt":0.3118351738015861,"score_spread":0.288222708338442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2310374476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014584139,0.0065361545,0.0005091302,0.01970116,0.00081451115,0.00027262652,0.000038796792,0.000023944733,0.97064525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946353,0.0004360425,0.00008153131,0.00159554,0.0010726777,0.000004700127,5.086456e-7,0.000011832057,0.0021618984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981345,0.0003551614,0.00046014632,0.000121408535,0.00063081237,0.00029794933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986385,0.00029421484,0.00044471203,0.00019879684,0.0003184896,0.00010530031],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001328763,0.00011090284,0.00022382422,0.000019608977,0.0020940949,0.0001282417,0.0005588397,0.00010607308,0.00039874832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002471196,0.00006368031,0.00015720821,0.0002284553,0.00074090913,0.0004133079,0.000050469866,0.00037399423,0.000011346744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000265638,0.00015896109,0.0002947909,0.000044268847,0.000087351116,0.0000015347871,0.009969848,0.00010853434,0.0023710423,0.94056743,0.04575635,0.00061331835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003423411,0.00006499369,0.00011993361,0.0001456477,0.00016068666,0.000024929574,0.0028853961,0.000016933818,0.002498911,0.01437283,0.9792371,0.00013033007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09892355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36449438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9931769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000080747006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025443488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99920505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2310583295","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1219","title":"Law and Feminism: Editor's Note","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.014026141060443734,"score_gpt":0.3046367552947283,"score_spread":0.2906106142342845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2310583295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005354742,0.00064415927,0.0011583437,0.0011644909,0.004361757,0.000073442236,0.0000019260926,0.00004080469,0.9920196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97607505,0.00013332117,0.00045564186,0.0009422392,0.021852635,8.416768e-7,3.883667e-7,0.000012457098,0.0005274046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984964,0.00007812794,0.0002837971,0.00014941816,0.0005391353,0.00045308084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990977,0.00013729736,0.00015541737,0.00007713224,0.00015688223,0.00037554206],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020879633,0.000105621635,0.00017392832,0.00003022859,0.002002692,0.0003924099,0.00019983247,0.00015858132,0.00010445651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007617418,0.000091825124,0.00005757642,0.00011677448,0.00038542555,0.00047769444,0.000034887817,0.00033980404,0.000037593505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013925673,0.000024073079,0.00017295715,0.000008430478,0.000011003807,0.000051800853,0.0033459263,9.0779196e-7,0.00010722803,0.99118406,0.0032119488,0.0018677454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002959993,0.000059964095,0.00012442736,0.00006119373,0.000017147815,0.00006439137,0.0023693698,0.000002013674,0.00023866432,0.09814995,0.89844155,0.00017531154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17831074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50268006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9914922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007420755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000098167715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312640086","doi":"10.1300/j082v47n03_07","title":"The Queer Sensitive Interveners in the<i>Little Sisters</i>Case","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Homosexuality","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Government of Ontario","keywords":"Queer; Lesbian; Supreme court; Scope (computer science); Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04158743626568111,"score_gpt":0.3474361665371785,"score_spread":0.3058487302714974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2312640086","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016372848,0.0014977993,0.00007159564,0.96414334,0.0027315482,0.00038415243,0.000029607278,0.000014283956,0.014754837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75997746,0.00017767742,0.000024070774,0.22599214,0.012036771,0.0000077546465,0.0000036913593,0.000026749123,0.00175369],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99497545,0.0022642717,0.0009611311,0.00018960774,0.0011482993,0.0004612261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967736,0.0012798383,0.0011397601,0.0002699601,0.0004688796,0.0000679338],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007526954,0.00021529038,0.00049416535,0.00008513516,0.00073272054,0.0004883281,0.0007598465,0.00043859307,0.000014983875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00099061,0.0001173215,0.00031688382,0.00037000724,0.0005966963,0.00030470785,0.000051781077,0.0023255576,0.000010771125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054246113,0.00009244827,0.00019941617,0.00017892395,0.00017088614,0.01712318,0.067526035,0.000009064925,0.0000034978398,0.0019280904,0.90993494,0.0027792891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002500621,0.000101197606,0.00010995207,0.00022466085,0.00004702825,0.00067218987,0.030111575,1.9366e-7,0.000007243913,0.005209888,0.96309674,0.00016925979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026852634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025551029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7436046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048378357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092405255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314285884","doi":"10.2307/3552548","title":"Beyond the Nass Valley: National Implications of the Supreme Court's Delgamuukw Decision","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03462854562494203,"score_gpt":0.3160677530455197,"score_spread":0.28143920742057765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314285884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038425047,0.00023697723,0.000059569305,0.40255406,0.00032583563,0.00034333806,0.00010073229,0.000024565768,0.5579299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99160695,0.000056087345,0.000012348993,0.0053335745,0.0010373921,0.000026878204,0.0000039924344,0.0000088749675,0.0019138716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998596,0.00011569412,0.00021577514,0.00014359372,0.000488955,0.00043994855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848974,0.0001981858,0.00011271679,0.00025812135,0.00056330924,0.00037794243],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081563985,0.00007783794,0.00009987182,0.00017729822,0.0015346112,0.00018553397,0.0008791699,0.000097488104,0.00019779745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020412353,0.00005122542,0.000077559016,0.0015149437,0.00038662372,0.00026547987,0.000041529787,0.00011557626,0.00003004394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.078191e-7,0.00000870952,0.0076303296,0.0000015069716,0.000010562421,2.2783222e-7,0.0011013417,0.0000034882607,0.000007424526,0.9007799,0.083394326,0.007061452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006953307,0.0000039885167,0.046372954,0.0000061119194,0.0000036253862,0.0000036345727,0.0004093616,0.000008169742,0.0000023012763,0.109183244,0.8438741,0.00006298733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78379697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94674546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9531819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006471196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013431424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328256650","doi":"10.1056/nejmp1201951","title":"The Severability of the Individual Mandate","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New England Journal of Medicine","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Severability; Mandate; Supreme court; Medicine; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Management; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.039499727826783654,"score_gpt":0.31495717086273434,"score_spread":0.27545744303595066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328256650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9079759,0.007926257,0.000067118985,0.0502784,0.004538653,0.00016618684,0.0000021497215,0.0000060401853,0.02903929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910768,0.000290112,0.000011214636,0.00018257422,0.00792213,2.4325834e-7,9.156869e-8,0.0000027161866,0.0005140693],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983871,0.00032348733,0.0003531528,0.000034065553,0.0007232591,0.0001789107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987122,0.00047286646,0.00039394654,0.000093277886,0.0001778133,0.00014993735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005845263,0.000051086066,0.00017453935,0.000019450197,0.00034352543,0.000014301551,0.00035184924,0.00003717531,0.00008109248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016953138,0.000019922867,0.000050107305,0.00018073192,0.00039221247,0.00016144759,0.000026913916,0.00020163938,0.0000011687246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003117829,0.00011105771,0.3646989,0.000054219687,0.0001986587,0.000003342998,0.1484828,0.000007984984,0.0003779306,0.034341875,0.068005316,0.38340616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031533148,0.000112952104,0.074601635,0.00011306107,0.00006398293,0.000022236807,0.0034677594,3.0659447e-7,0.00011142165,0.00572694,0.91258764,0.0000387508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028713383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011635714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8445823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023877568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025551036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43406236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328835147","doi":"10.1249/jsr.0b013e3182a4b858","title":"Arkansas’ Creation and Implementation of Health and Safety Legislation Utilizing Ambrose’s Requirements for Change","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Sports Medicine Reports","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Medicine; Medical emergency; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.10047560673218602,"score_gpt":0.42698301552486023,"score_spread":0.3265074087926742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328835147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9427313,0.029635046,0.0022866593,0.009810242,0.0032061024,0.007268396,0.000009668909,0.00010679542,0.0049457625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99590254,0.0032094053,0.000047200967,0.00008587028,0.00051380583,0.00010910516,0.00007613242,0.000008271914,0.000047669582],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982675,0.000049373848,0.00077430793,0.00024950277,0.0004419194,0.00021741181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985738,0.000038561975,0.0009133412,0.000094268034,0.00023212864,0.00014790492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016781118,0.000101121404,0.00029877666,0.00009425948,0.00034148578,0.00002032694,0.000025296233,0.000040121948,0.000065848166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015619647,0.00008676354,0.000020900301,0.00014260187,0.00015611474,0.0005373111,0.000014574148,0.000042153664,1.4231374e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072520165,0.0000226329,0.25299498,0.00042482646,0.000008694067,9.921332e-7,0.023764754,7.2382754e-8,0.000052042575,0.0025946938,0.0012587556,0.7188703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096875924,0.00027889642,0.72516245,0.0017604984,0.000064172214,0.00001211842,0.03657491,0.00002833527,0.000048964204,0.006552351,0.22829507,0.00025349561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023334589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071711745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7186168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066223714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017401042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98316914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329774564","doi":"10.11575/prism/34397","title":"It May Be Wrong, But Is It Illegal? – Castle-Crown Wilderness Coalition v. Flett and the Limits of Discretionary Decision-making","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wilderness; Crown (dentistry); Computer security; Law; Political science; Operations research; Computer science; Engineering; Medicine; Biology","score_opus":0.06411083598371471,"score_gpt":0.37282778135493116,"score_spread":0.30871694537121647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329774564","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6233353,0.0008150853,0.0007556784,0.08228262,0.00046778942,0.0012369035,0.00011483058,0.000004663631,0.2909871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958985,0.00009698054,0.0004888965,0.00071626704,0.00021842011,0.00001670159,0.000004541801,0.000009047874,0.0025506346],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857426,0.00013134582,0.00032070754,0.00027107613,0.000484894,0.0002177313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905133,0.00037262635,0.00019693209,0.0001647581,0.00014289656,0.00007142857],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011084728,0.00011234817,0.000248924,0.00003515632,0.00072702236,0.0003344885,0.00043722152,0.00010562724,0.0012177313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031330486,0.000078499375,0.000056643297,0.00023233243,0.0005933103,0.0006235298,0.00015127365,0.00010445178,0.000047289286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022526595,0.0006670366,0.005315724,0.00019986072,0.00034840952,0.00015870045,0.51585674,0.00033001165,0.0007265873,0.116589606,0.057395365,0.3001593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021848807,0.00009201535,0.0015040432,0.0011892737,0.00008366664,0.000023261553,0.06487904,0.000026232938,0.0007446954,0.010939133,0.917942,0.00039175898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01722911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011827485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86054665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057045647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029673963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331372983","doi":"10.3821/1913-701x-144.6.252","title":"Pharmacy owners in Newfoundland and Labrador Going to Court to Challenge Right of Professional Body to Negotiate Compensation Deal","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Pharmacy; Compensation (psychology); Business; Public relations; Political science; Law; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04992982977995006,"score_gpt":0.3119538476937048,"score_spread":0.26202401791375474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331372983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879529,0.0002845489,0.000056855646,0.0015273256,0.001954738,0.0008356984,0.0001224382,0.000016600567,0.007248904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953704,0.00048098544,0.00025030292,0.0024630583,0.00077015645,0.000026237714,0.0000038249023,0.00003105896,0.00060401607],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971672,0.00028268227,0.0006339208,0.00037802468,0.00058312924,0.00095501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995817,0.00009342489,0.00021160564,0.00010833152,0.00050655473,0.003263075],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012117159,0.0002598823,0.0004056046,0.00058647775,0.00089631067,0.00012885289,0.00051860913,0.000054209806,0.0005574589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019925878,0.00026046217,0.000053944736,0.0009771865,0.00012698083,0.00049262244,0.000060651153,0.00037429458,0.000018939101],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026226086,0.00060944894,0.12182963,0.0012168115,0.00053217314,0.051982462,0.47566268,0.0018539731,0.009912937,0.006443514,0.0794468,0.24788697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007880165,0.00037015093,0.0053541446,0.00059808476,0.00019605715,0.016218333,0.0013247993,0.0009270188,0.0024846483,0.0007626832,0.9614705,0.0024134363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7092128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9505435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8820237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002180486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044258754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2333618217","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.150202","title":"<i>Carter</i> v. <i>Canada</i>: What’s next for physicians?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Declaration; Law; Political science; Assisted suicide; Criminal code; Medicine; Criminal law","score_opus":0.020323901755975263,"score_gpt":0.26395464850151357,"score_spread":0.2436307467455383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2333618217","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04164626,0.0067608366,0.0007391039,0.77188635,0.036314327,0.0010221556,0.000083259285,0.00011067528,0.14143704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92740816,0.00042057838,0.00005948108,0.05369912,0.01533534,0.00002085104,0.000007808033,0.000022219605,0.003026444],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965795,0.0002158899,0.00033953635,0.00013553805,0.0020523411,0.0006771531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959884,0.00021667521,0.00024021044,0.00006157247,0.001120537,0.0023725785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031063794,0.000096046155,0.00021213057,0.000058274636,0.00083063607,0.0009125915,0.00034174198,0.00026782998,0.00030886565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037176085,0.000096521966,0.00007978394,0.00027100716,0.00005529902,0.0012336402,0.000007676388,0.00038962177,0.00004054784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036142342,0.000010019367,0.0014109518,0.000004283874,0.00003438942,0.000041728475,0.0029816593,0.0000022643253,0.0000011065202,0.003148164,0.91510326,0.07725859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004103431,0.000023237057,0.00016018497,0.00006417591,0.000010964167,0.000007917845,0.02024257,0.000020504738,0.0000036187337,0.0012128779,0.9777217,0.00012193291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8926794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99661034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8857619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023618897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029734053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9757665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2333983203","doi":"10.2307/3504632","title":"10.2307/3504632","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; Law; Political science; Civil rights; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Public law","score_opus":0.008543035132900959,"score_gpt":0.2249097289358994,"score_spread":0.21636669380299844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2333983203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010974399,0.00010698521,2.4803742e-7,0.0010578498,0.000006386114,0.00014441457,0.0000034985487,0.00012662314,0.99745655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015221926,0.0000012038462,0.000014164035,0.000109760644,0.0005852844,0.0000100546295,0.0000013524475,0.000008485152,0.9840478],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918514,0.00005550272,0.00011412191,0.00014149667,0.00025149627,0.0002522519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996334,0.000036167407,0.00001990537,0.00010010919,0.000052470685,0.00015798755],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026709202,0.00006479834,0.00011036551,0.000021316886,0.00031825507,0.00008831488,0.00019689486,0.00005672536,0.9901285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008399921,0.00006177441,0.00003453079,0.00029260598,0.000059089423,0.00015104386,0.000013702781,0.00004713131,0.97548187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002155969,0.000029733657,0.0000012058557,0.0000048216316,0.000007224906,0.000003854172,0.00068485294,0.000008964021,0.000013591722,0.00013331145,0.2769706,0.7221203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005497792,0.000037351874,0.000018660125,0.000011788468,0.0000042759902,3.6158582e-7,0.000018526865,0.0000026015457,0.000009314124,0.000061293664,0.99968415,0.000096678144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046517164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030057248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7227136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003653856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000091093236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70320344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335923003","doi":"10.18060/17656","title":"High Stakes: How to Define \"Disability\" in Medical Marijuana States in Light of the Americans with Disabilities Act, Canadian Law, and the Impact on Employers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indiana international & comparative law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.05860420647173557,"score_gpt":0.3501380052379137,"score_spread":0.29153379876617813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335923003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.823794,0.0027054732,0.0000029746577,0.060666405,0.00017484438,0.0017607482,0.00012811318,0.0000110434285,0.11075639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99656683,0.00060831005,0.000017302978,0.0026302605,0.000040344807,0.000086027845,0.000004224826,0.0000056653143,0.000041003987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981723,0.00050821935,0.00033168323,0.00020734206,0.0005437217,0.00023677612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885786,0.000531458,0.00014521094,0.0001635639,0.0001268774,0.00017501751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093596807,0.00014381806,0.00046709026,0.000040108676,0.00014052197,0.000050743573,0.00051498326,0.000037978352,0.00028203227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033330813,0.00006996142,0.00006511201,0.00045720913,0.0016754305,0.00017827252,0.000036790636,0.0001921741,0.000005272895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109682995,0.00010044002,0.09168405,0.00009987174,0.000069284535,0.000004456625,0.03661082,0.000014733631,1.8635568e-7,0.8702987,0.0006143371,0.00039346504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003420156,0.0010972263,0.4812443,0.018480975,0.00010979908,0.000011800865,0.055038143,0.00005259178,0.000101568934,0.051294576,0.38789985,0.0012490224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9446789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9848671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8190041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036709913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039977545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6173193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338606940","doi":"","title":"Developments in Administrative Law: The 2008-2009 Term -- Contemplating Legislative (Im)Precision","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Deference; Law; Political science; Statute; Standard of review; Administrative law; Judicial review; Tribe; Legislature; Judicial deference; Statutory interpretation","score_opus":0.05553443847400083,"score_gpt":0.3102329400619607,"score_spread":0.2546985015879599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338606940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7686387,0.00025473413,0.000026070478,0.0018621082,0.00014731374,0.00046889513,0.000020269359,0.000043835575,0.22853813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964625,0.000035367208,0.0002627437,0.00024511325,0.00009918929,6.0899305e-7,0.0000074816135,0.000008351884,0.0028786375],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975335,0.000532334,0.00030858206,0.00039312697,0.0007540681,0.00047837806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998671,0.0003204469,0.0003579617,0.00022099342,0.00025990803,0.00016966701],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017580246,0.00019771012,0.0003544933,0.00014805474,0.0019943325,0.000100648314,0.00075623073,0.0002482323,0.00013285379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003390182,0.0001900392,0.00011801596,0.00075563573,0.00055372616,0.0014459327,0.00011277055,0.00046998615,0.00006550529],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011516964,0.00057702063,0.38047135,0.00005881523,0.00016891405,0.00024980408,0.4667419,0.00003069851,0.0047559547,0.11903203,0.0011104776,0.025651358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019191356,0.00029321847,0.8900421,0.0005141521,0.00003906269,0.000005355093,0.04100956,0.000005874682,0.0008727686,0.007055728,0.057670943,0.000572081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062447796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039988827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5095708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002652735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042172082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99930495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338978280","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v46i2.4918","title":"The Implications of a Supreme Law Bill Of Rights for New Zealand Judicial Appointments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Bill of rights; Commission; Judicial review; Human rights","score_opus":0.03882758577520705,"score_gpt":0.2898765720509398,"score_spread":0.25104898627573274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338978280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02115082,0.15429866,0.0051472937,0.056147538,0.0068159965,0.015012682,0.00067369745,0.00029845958,0.74045485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832053,0.014232435,0.0004853453,0.00010489294,0.0004939304,0.0000016825854,0.0000132292125,0.0000100641755,0.001453094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907136,0.00010459174,0.00028112755,0.00012839853,0.000265517,0.00014900145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985893,0.00017260089,0.0004184895,0.00018140182,0.0005138885,0.00012432542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007832111,0.00007384445,0.00034567728,0.000017121532,0.00037230257,0.000008769548,0.0003880799,0.000064087704,0.00002010392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006869982,0.00005300151,0.00013337955,0.00025067764,0.00037035625,0.00013301703,0.00003192091,0.00004203282,0.0000048476145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037811762,0.000046903977,0.00012570921,0.00027125297,0.000048805603,1.1916871e-7,0.002015935,0.0000015187087,0.000034532088,0.98142654,0.015650587,0.00034028638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030589956,0.00007800876,0.000009584461,0.0005368808,0.00010513114,9.874404e-8,0.0001483027,7.105051e-7,0.00013347455,0.05427964,0.94434327,0.000058978738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22582304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04116832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9620545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049328748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030012528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97632784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342044936","doi":"","title":"Louisiana's Civil-Law Notaries","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Legislation; Expansive; Estate; Business; Public law","score_opus":0.020785326393138695,"score_gpt":0.28735207424954795,"score_spread":0.26656674785640927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342044936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053101625,0.02177014,0.0044027134,0.01749753,0.0024799204,0.00032191008,0.0000027695537,0.00021143764,0.90021193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912751,0.0009041338,0.00001806291,0.00026017107,0.0021457556,0.0000026547013,6.2734716e-7,0.0000134353395,0.005380109],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99680334,0.00016712464,0.00022672857,0.00014080484,0.0006040828,0.0020579235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920523,0.000038835726,0.00013419794,0.0000920258,0.00026224047,0.00026747357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035679347,0.00010587519,0.00017304695,0.000049097598,0.00086780044,0.00026279382,0.00034696117,0.00009869829,0.00005260178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031825868,0.00009129259,0.000075179116,0.00025771064,0.00023416584,0.0005220027,0.000026736412,0.00094797835,0.0001358348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016935952,0.000020664906,0.00066127174,0.0000018342853,0.00003514263,0.000004479082,0.0040065716,0.0000044821795,0.0000057522057,0.99156773,0.0014386467,0.0022364946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024358436,0.00010938921,0.000023233353,0.000010778873,0.000012692551,0.00003597577,0.01693365,0.000001685438,0.000010294816,0.5853822,0.39712107,0.00011539061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0338554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30513006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9381734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010800669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007400696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342501057","doi":"","title":"Tribunal Jurisdiction Over Charter Remedies: Now You See it, Now You Don't","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Jurisdiction; Charter; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Legislative intent; Legislature; Mandate; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Original jurisdiction; Statutory law","score_opus":0.013246779382523775,"score_gpt":0.27583513220765404,"score_spread":0.26258835282513027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342501057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5322964,0.00058493455,0.00016551123,0.017077282,0.01107036,0.0009632002,0.00009605182,0.00060365786,0.4371426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9650373,0.00015615702,0.000102222046,0.0016401169,0.0075489,0.00005699127,0.0000183317,0.000035565605,0.025404451],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971582,0.00014909428,0.0004824501,0.000529782,0.00095440494,0.0007260369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984937,0.00010296376,0.00022849962,0.0003937444,0.00029827448,0.0004828661],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013347964,0.00026172455,0.00037298136,0.0000790114,0.0012506661,0.00042694304,0.00048303936,0.00041407844,0.0038138004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037212437,0.00023820606,0.00017712345,0.0004523868,0.00043195483,0.0011183065,0.00007573724,0.00076391676,0.0019224536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003115272,0.0006735494,0.0726958,0.00027993956,0.00028699188,0.00008999011,0.023549272,0.000009649279,0.022522854,0.17807591,0.6957308,0.00577373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056392315,0.00007018133,0.0036968305,0.00006287496,0.000032943623,0.0000033974575,0.00091118534,0.000014833964,0.0006549283,0.002602857,0.991049,0.00033707617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022804728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18057816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43274087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012375113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99885464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344325849","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1020","title":"Goliath Arisen: Taking Aim at the Health Care Regime in Auton","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.029603809876643825,"score_gpt":0.37182756326721056,"score_spread":0.3422237533905667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344325849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34435672,0.007025685,0.000006831918,0.32965022,0.00042053216,0.0002526355,0.000009458923,0.000022719221,0.31825522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857404,0.00029624443,0.000012103169,0.0059633837,0.0074034543,9.349548e-7,3.0848426e-7,0.0000071215295,0.0005760293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986638,0.00023381044,0.00035876216,0.0000961581,0.00034822072,0.00029925248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917555,0.000043773514,0.0005215768,0.000054019074,0.000104576706,0.00010053466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011003084,0.0000764852,0.00025082869,0.000059510174,0.0012330398,0.00010788474,0.00015754865,0.00009696266,0.000014828013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010825644,0.00005404936,0.00008366807,0.00019007252,0.00025075162,0.0002551674,0.00003623688,0.00023813249,0.0000036583272],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041527994,0.00003305874,0.0007534016,0.000054320248,0.00001564182,0.000006770766,0.4226002,0.0000057117427,0.00001106382,0.54543996,0.005894574,0.025143724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054317823,0.00008505769,0.0037617409,0.00007190435,0.000009244404,0.000008800529,0.025246339,0.0000013322784,0.000010496441,0.003533083,0.9666204,0.00010841712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09455018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1189745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96072584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060610764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087121874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94836694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344334150","doi":"","title":"'On the Date of the Partial Wind-Up': Monsanto V. Ontario (Superintendent of Financial Services)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Pension; Financial services; Economics; Business; Finance; Financial system","score_opus":0.009558125926525423,"score_gpt":0.24503182632228587,"score_spread":0.23547370039576046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344334150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819887,0.00062097167,0.00006734402,0.004132034,0.0005256526,0.00019096407,0.0000028195382,0.000007446446,0.0124640325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99667853,0.00028015784,0.0000027355713,0.00020993796,0.00069299,0.0000023517516,2.007015e-7,0.000007294023,0.0021258218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977725,0.0001882921,0.00035605193,0.00011765364,0.0006016615,0.0009638035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992702,0.000059700982,0.00030655047,0.00016655106,0.00014633442,0.000050644176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019792998,0.000102499165,0.00018196196,0.000028749124,0.0005958141,0.000041605792,0.0006920367,0.000077762335,0.0001537056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000105137835,0.000056970533,0.00015290784,0.00020777389,0.00018220868,0.00018386851,0.00005195525,0.0009500248,0.000010511482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097479715,0.00008359039,0.005603694,0.00000939449,0.00005716105,4.0275694e-7,0.016951198,0.00012294854,0.00035186668,0.97209096,0.00015906607,0.0044722375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022787328,0.0011830297,0.02322635,0.0006060289,0.0002373927,0.00007735569,0.046304252,0.00010093392,0.010028268,0.3222675,0.5929618,0.0007283804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.101656534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7436829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6498234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028224627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004949563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9043256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345275768","doi":"","title":"Chevron Corp. v. Yaiguaje: Canadian Law and the New Global Economic and Environmental Realities","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Chevron (anatomy); Environmental law; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Geology","score_opus":0.004588649092674444,"score_gpt":0.2190748999977112,"score_spread":0.21448625090503676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345275768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67600363,0.041021306,0.00019002202,0.06573549,0.0009111594,0.0005761451,0.00008280557,0.00004707881,0.21543236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98379093,0.012095654,0.0000015886051,0.00031996396,0.00078123854,0.0000015757277,4.5677072e-7,0.0000056303834,0.0030029851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841964,0.00011343352,0.00014294605,0.00012256071,0.00012467046,0.0010767443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955595,0.0000530153,0.00008180974,0.00005655846,0.0000061145092,0.00024656203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001217473,0.000085096304,0.00012659818,0.00001581698,0.000855497,0.0001465608,0.00014539805,0.00006376686,0.00005989837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027245513,0.000049803442,0.000032098716,0.000025337928,0.00058689807,0.00027618435,0.000019493253,0.00022066412,0.000014406687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002279137,0.0000016296893,0.001959824,7.9062215e-7,0.000029642455,7.900768e-7,0.00093138503,1.1678551e-7,0.0000074457407,0.98622715,0.00034784919,0.01047057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011348769,0.00006602113,0.00087544695,0.000018377723,0.000024469598,0.000120675235,0.009558316,0.0000013723109,0.000005705328,0.7066676,0.28138903,0.00013808816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8169793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97090137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30778727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017750363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033957525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6579878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345860747","doi":"","title":"St. John's Holdings v. Two Electronics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.014678228177880044,"score_gpt":0.28039365544863765,"score_spread":0.2657154272707576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345860747","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3769329,0.0059736483,0.00047551305,0.013235707,0.0018367575,0.0007117533,0.000039575752,0.0007365385,0.6000576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98497385,0.00044247415,0.00008410808,0.0009147308,0.001669146,0.000024205032,0.0000013537674,0.00002384323,0.011866321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980294,0.00010625855,0.00025844545,0.00034434895,0.00055582693,0.0007056934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990013,0.00013307766,0.00012623095,0.00024185824,0.00016819972,0.0003293016],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008680009,0.0001535401,0.00022913699,0.000039682254,0.00077067,0.0002019754,0.00043987276,0.00012964357,0.0011979539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041434914,0.00011141892,0.000095704796,0.00031990858,0.00028638486,0.0007294476,0.000059604507,0.00018044416,0.0009663837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014351516,0.00003125456,0.0019499487,0.00001091354,0.00002001423,0.000008153172,0.00052020716,5.617611e-7,0.002379756,0.97675705,0.014445623,0.0038621908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043324966,0.000050457435,0.000150342,0.00007050012,0.00001139677,0.0000012476762,0.00019714056,5.334903e-7,0.0013506337,0.048521467,0.9489882,0.00022481856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027130375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04225824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9345426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002533523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040192055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346636438","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511596780.007","title":"Moral Authority in English and American Abortion Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutionalism; Abortion; Constitutional right; Political science; Constitutional law; Abortion law; Supreme court; Sociology; Population; Family planning; Politics","score_opus":0.017764901221628215,"score_gpt":0.24666138140816662,"score_spread":0.2288964801865384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346636438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33175215,0.000029204099,0.000020535994,0.000093889445,0.0000797218,0.00011240171,0.000005701457,0.000074289856,0.66783214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98698187,0.000027589062,0.000026403117,0.00009345567,0.00015888273,2.299845e-7,0.0000011518648,0.0000024390426,0.012707986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927443,0.00012066811,0.00007727243,0.00017525323,0.0001478789,0.0002044705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964035,0.000023823168,0.00005993558,0.00007474353,0.000088890454,0.00011228883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020594944,0.00006736481,0.00013581822,0.000043686992,0.00030870686,0.000060054954,0.00012649687,0.000056369252,3.6361413e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032519263,0.000079876874,0.000023623734,0.00006423729,0.00033878657,0.00023706158,0.00002807294,0.00011508889,4.8308783e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025479643,0.00001533948,0.00104413,0.0000054325856,0.0000027061446,0.000021860807,0.0026894652,7.1452763e-7,0.000026225236,0.99320155,0.0007798709,0.00218723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006048255,0.00011577954,0.029510338,0.00004574818,0.000023613773,6.6689415e-7,0.0118109295,0.000033551234,0.00024449758,0.00011830844,0.95718604,0.00030567995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08767818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021292754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99308324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009144946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005731493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91839707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2359817729","doi":"","title":"Irish American Lesbian Gains Canadian Immigrant Status","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Lesbian; Irish; Political science; Legal status; Immigration law; Gender studies; Law; Demographic economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.013009293907134284,"score_gpt":0.3053727218628849,"score_spread":0.2923634279557506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2359817729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7571937,0.006091937,0.0026900303,0.007869249,0.0010314254,0.00033363956,0.000010898564,0.000107061605,0.22467206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992263,0.0032306004,0.000022756582,0.00041638536,0.0014514728,0.000001393824,0.000001686413,0.000019589721,0.002593082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99373686,0.00012213763,0.0003031482,0.00017937363,0.0004848944,0.00517356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987009,0.000055342407,0.00019387143,0.00009947681,0.00017354783,0.0007768288],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043457365,0.000129772,0.00020470984,0.00021571472,0.0014031703,0.00017064631,0.00032427956,0.00007947144,0.000056941295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022374556,0.00012188884,0.0001014191,0.0006522747,0.00026583404,0.0002571419,0.000010778744,0.0012524532,0.000059814578],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009173595,0.000098132055,0.08540265,0.000009574079,0.00025838095,0.000117109164,0.030243792,0.000010803838,0.00016707905,0.50103605,0.0046950816,0.37786958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003477983,0.0002737503,0.009666134,0.000023534907,0.000026359643,0.00006149809,0.13939583,0.000002099004,0.000022007116,0.035404906,0.8144132,0.0003629017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.959228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99759036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8097181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003672723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015431636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2367629654","doi":"","title":"Not Out There: Why Outdoor Smoking Bans Finally Pass Constitutional Muster","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Secondhand smoke; Environmental health; Law; Business; Medicine","score_opus":0.11790511293036299,"score_gpt":0.34706352026548243,"score_spread":0.22915840733511944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2367629654","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0112627605,0.0020170116,0.0087406635,0.037100308,0.006462541,0.00050965464,0.000032735916,0.00013458029,0.9337397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850608,0.00018244454,0.0003204106,0.012081413,0.0019124118,0.0000056063923,9.531033e-7,0.000009422989,0.0004265561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977479,0.00033189275,0.0005014697,0.00017197442,0.0006419976,0.00060478126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987749,0.000070506816,0.00036155756,0.0000918084,0.00025641045,0.00044482763],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021326763,0.00012141149,0.0002459046,0.00004698808,0.0028528266,0.00018940827,0.00027274556,0.00011765033,0.0011175709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011506812,0.00009975087,0.00009822967,0.00011342176,0.0006369965,0.0004815553,0.000026812862,0.00045148024,0.00008203115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005038755,0.0000871298,0.005805885,0.00004944838,0.000036115125,0.000054738717,0.022712534,0.0000018694285,0.0000065654594,0.955987,0.011782254,0.0034260766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046812196,0.00012611687,0.003890052,0.00022777142,0.000013364313,0.00006421507,0.0034601812,0.0000029024866,0.000018855464,0.013041683,0.9784881,0.00019862731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03781875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054548867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97379804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022910512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013922879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W23790115","doi":"10.29173/alr193","title":"Recent Regulatory and Legislative Developments of Interest to Oil and Gas Lawyers","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Calgary Laboratory Services; Suncor Energy (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Variety (cybernetics); Commission; Energy law; Political science; Public administration; Business; Key (lock); Fossil fuel; Law; Environmental law; Engineering","score_opus":0.042440730634729036,"score_gpt":0.31896632749318915,"score_spread":0.2765255968584601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W23790115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19164255,0.053618293,7.696757e-7,0.017892439,0.0005049669,0.00037177117,0.0000028872757,0.000017308941,0.73594904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8868266,0.107727624,0.00016334128,0.0020945182,0.00009952101,0.000023346327,0.000001470421,0.000010406452,0.0030531916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999244,0.000074857024,0.00023463706,0.00017331573,0.0001255229,0.00014767057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999414,0.00012643558,0.0001042064,0.00009724865,0.00011056704,0.00014753206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000533959,0.00008297894,0.00025939403,0.00001466689,0.0001625982,0.000028569586,0.000108712375,0.000051105064,0.00008883006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004925305,0.00006792921,0.000019200088,0.00016426372,0.00024353246,0.00015841963,0.000059950115,0.00008245779,0.000015098781],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005811805,0.000022648403,0.0013231765,0.0011259023,0.00003119549,9.523188e-7,0.0067611365,7.56857e-9,0.00021808883,0.5848059,0.0021212897,0.40358388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005715192,0.0000144800915,0.00032325453,0.0014942803,0.0000161469,0.000001197343,0.00007388899,4.9934428e-8,0.00007061325,0.0004408924,0.99741846,0.00008959216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03289568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26950014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99529713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013750397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009167494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97354436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2394661373","doi":"10.29173/alr1409","title":"Clones, Controversy, and Criminal Law: A Comment on the Proposal for Legislation Governing Assisted Human Reproduction","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lawson Health Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Reproduction; Criminal law; Law; Government (linguistics); Mechanism (biology); Political science; Government regulation; Reproductive technology; Human reproduction; Law and economics; Sociology; Biology; Genetics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05611255327318252,"score_gpt":0.3423504418763614,"score_spread":0.28623788860317884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2394661373","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0052289153,0.039928496,0.00009499235,0.40461132,0.0006841214,0.0053986865,0.000008251274,0.00007767657,0.54396755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768599,0.0054493533,0.000036440713,0.014762352,0.00078574475,0.00019312307,0.00001806387,0.000013947906,0.001881049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988398,0.00023007013,0.00025189648,0.00025030217,0.00024472323,0.00018320196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991318,0.00033720818,0.00020427046,0.00017583868,0.0001034396,0.000047472677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012184479,0.000098089404,0.00022378474,0.000006312766,0.0012031692,0.00011430272,0.00010444263,0.000045838173,0.000042520067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048462523,0.00006629982,0.00006220736,0.00010364187,0.00017073775,0.00018159334,0.0000174216,0.00008304791,0.00001178074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013387977,0.000031663796,0.00007752481,0.00031082376,0.000015467303,4.227073e-7,0.0006114829,1.3086746e-7,0.000020459654,0.98589766,0.00848822,0.0045327423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016859954,0.00009408335,0.0000792582,0.00095380895,0.00009646374,0.0000033541114,0.00016260722,0.0000026957941,0.0000116092315,0.0022817624,0.99605155,0.0000941798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17650616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12646778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9875634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069891204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053601452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9253926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2401018369","doi":"","title":"Equity's Maxims as a Concept in Canadian Jurisprudence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Equity (law); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.015532785515953934,"score_gpt":0.3321780412997231,"score_spread":0.3166452557837692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2401018369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5141973,0.040207636,0.00032492628,0.012628816,0.0021910437,0.0005018313,0.000004106951,0.00006905472,0.4298753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938074,0.0015512622,0.0000055837017,0.0002980003,0.0014244114,0.0000047372855,4.901075e-7,0.000010637132,0.0028975175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944085,0.0001695144,0.00022349715,0.00011367739,0.00042243858,0.004662373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914104,0.000038476952,0.00009817047,0.00007327567,0.00007130181,0.0005777424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045879423,0.00009780032,0.00015324655,0.00013725531,0.0006043495,0.00012751762,0.00038823753,0.0001193197,0.00020691361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003407771,0.00009213471,0.000054069398,0.00039957935,0.00012224905,0.000695974,0.000028109944,0.0011125414,0.00016600803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063730367,0.000027797298,0.027415372,0.0000024161009,0.000016612363,0.0000070272717,0.009754533,0.000002542723,0.000016550883,0.9467712,0.0002480275,0.01573155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052485405,0.00017952797,0.004540624,0.00007637367,0.000019915975,0.00018104802,0.03609257,0.0000037141958,0.000048074686,0.4366255,0.5212709,0.00043690292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9099655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97825056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52102286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035247616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016563533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98901165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414443586","doi":"","title":"Private v. public. Canada's Supreme Court decision shakes fundamentals of system.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Supreme Court Decisions; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02770067040335001,"score_gpt":0.2504139590335681,"score_spread":0.2227132886302181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2414443586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7706267,0.00161898,0.00014452121,0.008045255,0.001428955,0.001563337,0.000064986816,0.00016132166,0.21634589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99803495,0.000027876442,0.00006341496,0.00014317388,0.00061316404,0.00018915864,0.0000029884857,0.000010543451,0.0009147194],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979658,0.000094310606,0.00038913015,0.00019786444,0.0008470329,0.00050582696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907404,0.0001343792,0.00019660933,0.00015815301,0.00017629768,0.0002605415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011679529,0.00009963326,0.00024485646,0.000058727474,0.00032599666,0.00012152443,0.00036263888,0.00007698475,0.00005590786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003747364,0.000088576664,0.00004838775,0.00032797872,0.00011296085,0.00036236987,0.000049831666,0.000066168344,0.0000087504395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008482561,0.0002443202,0.10837624,0.00046071043,0.00017008495,0.000018203433,0.0038408309,0.00005038025,0.00009056529,0.19222207,0.07231921,0.6221226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025242672,0.0000067914575,0.04467283,0.00005152987,0.0000119049055,0.0000012159625,0.0019660725,0.000011346486,0.00036942033,0.00018346317,0.95231575,0.00015727969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6972438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90323806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87999654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060296454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053789705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36120516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W243121698","doi":"","title":"The Impaired Dual System Framework of United States Drunk-Driving Law: How International Perspectives Yield More Sober Results","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sobriety; Law enforcement; Law; Enforcement; Criminology; Driving under the influence; Poison control; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Psychiatry; Environmental health","score_opus":0.011733558702517596,"score_gpt":0.2780547868322283,"score_spread":0.2663212281297107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W243121698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63032275,0.002266599,0.0024711192,0.08650429,0.009056348,0.0004775531,0.00023635781,0.00015331976,0.26851165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99537504,0.00018326115,0.00025967893,0.00012210927,0.0025511659,0.0000021737033,0.000010145583,0.000016399581,0.0014800245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974123,0.0001582588,0.0007036555,0.00016045076,0.0013266964,0.00023861689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958105,0.00086843956,0.0010913789,0.00011482946,0.002024183,0.0000906375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013508144,0.0001426689,0.00024382421,0.0001526586,0.0005730112,0.00040576997,0.00066839694,0.00012380925,0.000027990262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008616117,0.000102382226,0.00019097532,0.00024548033,0.00058307446,0.00057750125,0.00006623874,0.00033986353,0.0000029798284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023521968,0.000097510514,0.0009923085,0.000012796455,0.0001986615,0.00004101365,0.009232256,0.0010873756,0.00015094767,0.9832096,0.0046362663,0.00010605725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017444371,0.00036578195,0.0041271527,0.0024893868,0.00010997482,0.00018473735,0.2085255,0.0011222826,0.0016391446,0.02352911,0.75559103,0.00057143765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017759264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005038309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9596805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035139528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016714538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9887816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461841409","doi":"10.3138/uram.26.3.220","title":"Ultimate Justice and The American Legal System","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ultimate Reality and Meaning","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024419565148632673,"score_gpt":0.31060045016850446,"score_spread":0.28618088501987177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461841409","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16812503,0.0010880685,0.0011596698,0.0021552537,0.00044328527,0.00054566265,0.000014534758,0.00025781125,0.8262107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986656,0.00050402485,0.00025516952,0.00018647015,0.00015846467,0.00001137062,8.909959e-7,0.000008503218,0.0002095344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851733,0.00049059,0.0002191087,0.00021611876,0.00024346703,0.00031337267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991883,0.00031638917,0.00018067511,0.00010719352,0.00007859876,0.00012883348],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002337083,0.00011114607,0.00028918707,0.000023536648,0.0014538366,0.00028371587,0.00009205008,0.000041304593,0.0000044506864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056740065,0.0000758035,0.00003320843,0.00019984452,0.00077543635,0.00022883415,0.00002588329,0.000118902106,0.0000054322263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039873525,0.000007225797,0.0003011997,0.00024575178,0.000018084722,0.0000060745692,0.0109951105,0.000007933697,0.000042994867,0.9857899,0.000089777735,0.0024561035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0057903775,0.00018055481,0.0054761367,0.0010734737,0.0012698378,0.00023116404,0.3898904,0.0056649847,0.00045945693,0.018480426,0.5699008,0.0015824077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061667394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027090146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9673094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004413651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000069455855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2462065632","doi":"","title":"Check List for Legislators: Towards a Canadian Approach to End-of-Life Choices.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Parliament; Legislation; Human rights; Law; Political science; Transparency (behavior); Supreme court; Assisted suicide; Politics","score_opus":0.05512585813284403,"score_gpt":0.2773274205096741,"score_spread":0.2222015623768301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2462065632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030998493,0.0004879089,0.00097199326,0.014038651,0.0012008651,0.003271072,0.00017454356,0.00009850165,0.94875795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99044865,0.000011804453,0.0001175637,0.0004902163,0.0012290151,0.0016931397,0.0000016352942,0.000013610355,0.005994355],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985555,0.000043503274,0.00022514637,0.00023641184,0.00030036477,0.00063908764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875283,0.00006987309,0.00008823934,0.00013825131,0.00016215397,0.00078862684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009834534,0.00009424794,0.00021466635,0.00010770253,0.0002539742,0.00007583096,0.00034768932,0.00010739144,0.000032310134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015714517,0.000068197005,0.00007421698,0.00034452367,0.00013963485,0.00024280595,0.000021915333,0.000035817753,0.000009579545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007387183,0.00015119258,0.023734197,0.00023846808,0.00013246927,0.00000129097,0.014511777,0.0000021093101,0.000041689043,0.18666704,0.07066729,0.7037786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002461569,0.0000096895365,0.017084563,0.000013055259,0.000008207329,1.0776817e-7,0.00043103032,7.2558646e-7,0.00010725693,0.000562599,0.98139876,0.00013782288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78555554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65290993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9594502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026368556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012461155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35342354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2462788911","doi":"","title":"Supreme Court denies leave to appeal in medical marijuana charter challenge.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Possession (linguistics); Philosophy","score_opus":0.0490595872218848,"score_gpt":0.27067366526851017,"score_spread":0.22161407804662536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2462788911","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15320334,0.0021243456,0.000052092993,0.15597628,0.0015222705,0.0017950292,0.000006701252,0.00021894548,0.685101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937222,0.00022827835,0.000007869269,0.00093555544,0.0009760292,0.0005279582,6.3528375e-7,0.00001100883,0.0035904662],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979442,0.00011574354,0.0002443796,0.0002492988,0.00080599886,0.00064042164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930185,0.00007696199,0.000041656353,0.000114068214,0.0000539893,0.00041148733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010179323,0.00010175687,0.0002099379,0.00009834667,0.00018285049,0.00008479648,0.0003281159,0.00015677797,0.00063226826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058031327,0.000094099756,0.000043493048,0.00034334837,0.00012876667,0.00021022101,0.000059499154,0.00016667543,0.00024953394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004397986,0.00044858738,0.022711214,0.00009456576,0.00005250495,0.00018084531,0.06538085,0.0000031199856,0.0000024794097,0.029903477,0.075021185,0.8061572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057822093,0.000036592417,0.09491338,0.000053832282,0.000008981429,0.0000029750877,0.0034549048,0.000056907422,0.000012389972,0.0018341622,0.8986688,0.00037882815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00790837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044764113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8405189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001101077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003698008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99869806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2463543593","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2783895","title":"Dead Hands, Living Trees, Historic Compromises: The Senate Reform and Supreme Court Act References Brings the Originalism Debate to Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.012233293648170801,"score_gpt":0.2444069167170582,"score_spread":0.2321736230688874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2463543593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93181515,0.0077042915,0.0001773565,0.05066191,0.0007419808,0.00033632637,0.0000046281816,0.000036564954,0.008521798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986287,0.0045051877,0.000002863756,0.00034111558,0.00087305973,0.000008801313,1.873849e-7,0.000013197684,0.007968608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99708194,0.00022755063,0.00027390683,0.00020585809,0.00062233146,0.0015884264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990107,0.00022445917,0.00026660325,0.00014462954,0.00017682071,0.00017681597],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031643165,0.00015639924,0.00020088156,0.000042598207,0.002043872,0.00023691506,0.0006318045,0.000057899364,0.000021615675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003052176,0.00006894992,0.000047090354,0.00026194062,0.0001606812,0.00026786778,0.000057753834,0.0006123479,0.000005442357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032999014,0.00010804222,0.03471295,0.00006310201,0.0008592236,0.00004523926,0.050433528,0.000008610303,0.0022153489,0.62658376,0.022053074,0.26258713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000573599,0.00029985132,0.0051063057,0.00040889147,0.00008297965,0.00021167147,0.025570627,0.0000054310567,0.00010193195,0.032234073,0.9349412,0.00046346846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9267769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99427736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9128881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041063265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007869584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2464221961","doi":"","title":"Clarifying the Doctrine of Rectification in Canada: A Comment on Shafron v. KRG Insurance Brokers (Western) Inc.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Business; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.01446423488740496,"score_gpt":0.2596307595832642,"score_spread":0.24516652469585926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2464221961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9677772,0.0013484524,0.00006970898,0.026575573,0.00027091018,0.00033401718,0.0000016212424,0.0000059352515,0.0036165956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973267,0.0016931341,0.0000022721247,0.0005045955,0.00022432832,0.000015367432,7.410804e-7,0.0000063705143,0.00022650644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799293,0.00024609335,0.0003264164,0.00011123324,0.00042781208,0.00089552073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934876,0.000112950154,0.00026357739,0.00010202327,0.00012084048,0.000051823838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017843231,0.000080634134,0.00015240248,0.000055238703,0.00034932987,0.0000569619,0.00031107478,0.000049949376,0.000029108009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011770497,0.00005767729,0.00002859524,0.00029151255,0.000055335422,0.00022341165,0.000014960703,0.0010079277,0.000008892267],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001644889,0.00022930096,0.5548731,0.00004969537,0.00017608026,0.0000043142345,0.013880078,0.00044234472,0.00093780603,0.20898974,0.003934392,0.21631865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003166269,0.0010900757,0.5302317,0.00072438683,0.00005335818,0.000053554046,0.11914634,0.00010317329,0.0010912047,0.11291056,0.23039651,0.0010328442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98196787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99353385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22646211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002920125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061114193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465691456","doi":"","title":"St. John's University School of Law St. John's Law Scholarship Repository","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.015159421075503176,"score_gpt":0.2521878395926588,"score_spread":0.23702841851715561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2465691456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.100019135,0.00020597944,0.000039311137,0.0003596529,0.0002941966,0.00018063486,0.000013386823,0.00013362507,0.89875406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97889185,0.0000147022565,0.00015179416,0.00019055148,0.00056985643,8.6188624e-7,0.0000036892825,0.000009468147,0.02016721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984062,0.00020002449,0.00025634846,0.000265482,0.00055140257,0.0003205632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990576,0.00008681501,0.00016910124,0.00020711357,0.00030598082,0.0001734053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000663153,0.00011657794,0.00023028918,0.000052062747,0.0009965638,0.00012948073,0.00038833675,0.00018277465,0.0004260026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007048817,0.00011410781,0.000100925005,0.00034697697,0.00052844686,0.0009266439,0.000065407025,0.0001968279,0.00005996166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017399603,0.000070859925,0.0062478636,0.000030019013,0.00001531231,0.000026358703,0.00025050607,0.0000054098227,0.0005634833,0.9865637,0.006167063,0.000042016483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003620192,0.000052748845,0.0045062215,0.00006431219,0.000031156625,0.0000014265252,0.0018541827,0.0000013982376,0.0026535,0.017298795,0.9729276,0.0002466649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4100738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.112218425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9692649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017442546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031880604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90398127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W24771791","doi":"10.1093/bja/aeu123","title":"Carter v. Canada (Attorney General): Canadian Courts Revisit the Criminalization of Assisted Suicide, 59 Wayne L. Rev. 561 (2013)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Anaesthesia","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.01943920825066627,"score_gpt":0.25021001268375603,"score_spread":0.23077080443308975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W24771791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9583303,0.011814594,0.000045307297,0.016872644,0.00069629675,0.00046791538,0.000018796201,0.000011274032,0.011742902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99569607,0.0016124517,0.00007341839,0.0010976003,0.00067182945,0.0000042375236,0.0000030864455,0.00001615489,0.00082512625],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977919,0.0003349133,0.0006486803,0.00012807989,0.0007169479,0.0003794815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758327,0.000052061572,0.000588926,0.00013055684,0.0012520691,0.00039310651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010267302,0.00011290421,0.00034929774,0.00007725494,0.00057319045,0.0002701739,0.00044702186,0.000100786376,0.00039450912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035928912,0.00009986433,0.00010197513,0.00028931542,0.0001630608,0.00044131116,0.000011042221,0.00019751412,0.000006014689],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012415591,0.000052809854,0.02319889,0.00010421006,0.00010824867,0.0006792324,0.0026480216,0.00005817665,0.00011058489,0.0036956826,0.853289,0.1160427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035538746,0.00014067156,0.2767807,0.00100226,0.00012153149,0.0005397833,0.0028245468,0.000025514988,0.000073987896,0.00069852814,0.7171096,0.0003274651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9991805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25358182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003584691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003411058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60510707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2490563910","doi":"10.5342/michhistrevi.38.1.0001","title":"Michigan Ceded: Why and Wherefore?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Historical Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering","score_opus":0.03220956045452139,"score_gpt":0.30651475323354843,"score_spread":0.27430519277902704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2490563910","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007905539,0.89526683,0.00006300175,0.009760914,0.0013730982,0.0004909337,0.0000027164385,0.0001287137,0.08500823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7284743,0.24241002,0.000399178,0.012252609,0.0039846348,0.000075316166,0.0000062808163,0.000055915687,0.012341719],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983563,0.0002077457,0.00034942257,0.0002204384,0.00037384886,0.000492252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907434,0.000082301674,0.00013874612,0.00017205029,0.00007336846,0.00045917282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010332825,0.00015538956,0.0004354402,0.000035024223,0.00046839088,0.000037252757,0.00021012874,0.000104161365,0.00022513336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005260491,0.00012582463,0.00009867325,0.00035771888,0.00008530152,0.00034020745,0.00004793071,0.00017360144,0.00015176676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025783911,0.00065261597,0.03371535,0.01000853,0.00012319043,0.000016270058,0.04922552,6.469589e-8,0.0006531151,0.25403574,0.5417373,0.109806515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049765284,0.000018671075,0.0002807335,0.0005869024,0.000047431535,0.0000032271396,0.00013904071,8.440418e-8,0.000008435845,0.00042946608,0.9982561,0.00018012717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008886811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005349353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7205688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021714326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009566069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2494567957","doi":"10.29173/alr367","title":"Recent Regulatory and Legislative Developments of Interest to Oil and Gas Lawyers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Fossil fuel; Petroleum industry; Energy law; Political science; Business; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Environmental law; Engineering","score_opus":0.09678805675881301,"score_gpt":0.33863822203446475,"score_spread":0.24185016527565173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2494567957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044505306,0.15831108,0.0000012910917,0.015755223,0.00027427706,0.0003130262,0.0000021482908,0.000014812358,0.7808228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8213703,0.1698463,0.00017172458,0.00319845,0.00010916671,0.000030057581,0.0000023377158,0.000013727057,0.0052579325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917465,0.0001242629,0.00023722979,0.00016323505,0.0001573483,0.00014326102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993472,0.00009063405,0.00010296128,0.00008254646,0.00016005998,0.00021658091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006770368,0.00008083741,0.00027521918,0.000014333556,0.00010217618,0.000025851305,0.00009660271,0.000038354217,0.000024517673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057971216,0.00006610732,0.000016077181,0.00018483138,0.00018573862,0.00017373952,0.00006552241,0.000041843246,0.000017772229],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016156553,0.000035652993,0.0018001492,0.0015804096,0.000057252502,0.0000021364326,0.022130135,6.937858e-8,0.0000165588,0.53541243,0.011594092,0.427355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008656227,0.000025745972,0.00009599576,0.0022112164,0.000017301958,0.0000010502064,0.00024115323,7.332126e-8,0.000020478416,0.00058250834,0.99663043,0.000087502165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040096786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10746339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9850363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003971263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014862945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9662953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498238348","doi":"","title":"Pursuing the Perfect Mother: Why America's Criminalization of Maternal Substance Abuse is Not the Answer- A Compartive Legal Analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Criminology; Substance abuse; Psychology; Substance use; Child custody; Political science; Law; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.02418125322418489,"score_gpt":0.3038653782064632,"score_spread":0.2796841249822783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2498238348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9531527,0.00033446323,0.009987441,0.009260171,0.00010861574,0.00028655923,0.000009105965,0.00005164282,0.026809292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99607676,0.0001350752,0.000037071233,0.0024427494,0.0001766181,0.0000057978687,9.737919e-7,0.0000047538892,0.0011202259],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854666,0.00024637586,0.00026036915,0.0001746208,0.00054072536,0.00023124235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992032,0.00012025354,0.00022464001,0.00018436844,0.00022303175,0.000044509015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005466165,0.00010023669,0.00023619678,0.0000543862,0.0005930571,0.00020155171,0.00038906283,0.00003839145,0.00036330346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032411568,0.000054131113,0.00012987996,0.0011332533,0.0003141802,0.00028215302,0.0000055898995,0.00008179551,0.000010590566],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032742746,0.00032444004,0.08845665,0.000056200395,0.0010320175,0.000009556135,0.77166766,0.002411767,0.0035058758,0.10310303,0.013877001,0.015228364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008621383,0.0005865277,0.25554734,0.00017219187,0.0021486462,0.00000426317,0.15197712,0.010788223,0.022845283,0.0034609826,0.5505615,0.0010457895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.069759294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01932338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61969054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003920905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004606599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503483160","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511527432.014","title":"Changing the Path of the Law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Surprise; Law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Path dependence; Phenomenon; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; History; Political science; Neoclassical economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.019881765680081556,"score_gpt":0.21014143948762617,"score_spread":0.1902596738075446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2503483160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013008877,0.00021831765,0.0000073115016,0.00010858302,0.00030567736,0.00039906317,0.00007879646,0.00004131242,0.9987109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12535255,0.00009608713,0.0000012864352,0.00013153585,0.00034093944,3.9403835e-7,0.0000015318358,0.000014552059,0.8740611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891144,0.00009222354,0.00013409903,0.0002022568,0.0004128947,0.0002470685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991746,0.00007735119,0.00023238671,0.00033680533,0.00011667028,0.00006219854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002586526,0.00015673017,0.00023022493,0.000041195017,0.0011769887,0.000045350243,0.00083137763,0.00022535042,0.000013591312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010146967,0.00011047375,0.00020771292,0.000020765005,0.0009660249,0.000069234535,0.00020599562,0.0002893542,0.0000061781816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010635339,0.0000025387449,8.5157853e-7,0.000026596901,0.000035585083,0.000008651364,0.0021436426,6.994839e-7,0.0000027256579,0.99407214,0.0031862569,0.0005097004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008845879,0.000008406913,0.0000027599528,0.00020443476,0.0000858764,8.127807e-7,0.0009771055,0.0000011006796,0.00006229116,0.00016948345,0.9982617,0.00013757161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012143857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037467023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99507546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093173134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020696275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99443436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2504631741","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107416031.019","title":"Attorney-General of Canada on Behalf of the United States of America <i>v</i>. Khadr","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Reports","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Respondent; Political science; Law; Jurisdiction; Misconduct; Terrorism; State (computer science); Human rights; Economic Justice; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.021638512689180052,"score_gpt":0.28310135020311034,"score_spread":0.2614628375139303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2504631741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6196646,0.000037909802,0.000008134228,0.0021091276,0.0014439663,0.00010232679,0.000038875252,0.00000660548,0.37658843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979036,0.000004615853,0.000021123808,0.00027563554,0.00012523896,0.0000025521088,0.00001204026,0.0000038904313,0.0016512908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858385,0.000053337833,0.00035891865,0.000086920976,0.0008310932,0.00008584782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985729,0.000056338,0.00054178224,0.00011140388,0.0006637885,0.000053773245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028194388,0.000047983085,0.00012586259,0.000025046453,0.00005077674,0.000007778457,0.00017452224,0.000025869123,0.000041816693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003191157,0.00003480279,0.000039829898,0.0001771287,0.00022058251,0.00005490369,0.000033295844,0.00004144039,2.0078073e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007299115,0.00024881627,0.07009939,0.000042886688,0.00018194494,0.00006876737,0.006948963,0.005357251,0.0006108318,0.8713447,0.0446595,0.00036398158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010080798,0.000049295282,0.0018166739,0.000080557904,0.00001013125,0.0000049882215,0.00096925837,0.000042776446,0.008461092,0.008962637,0.9794257,0.00007604303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97851115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62201154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93476623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009796428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008383535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38488576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2504914278","doi":"10.29173/alr360","title":"The Further Adventures and Strange Afterlife of the Oil and Gas Lease","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Afterlife; Lease; Adventure; Economics; Business; Law and economics; Philosophy; History; Finance; Art history; Theology","score_opus":0.02405054878716231,"score_gpt":0.29294165083335244,"score_spread":0.26889110204619016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2504914278","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024162246,0.7118478,2.047797e-7,0.056169476,0.00023140309,0.00024512943,0.0000027447486,0.000006638286,0.20733435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8967264,0.09924619,0.0000020354264,0.0015076337,0.00012605217,0.000015058286,2.059321e-7,0.0000048829384,0.0023714898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992193,0.00020942981,0.00015689827,0.00009412919,0.00020000916,0.000120208715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943453,0.00018610047,0.00009390589,0.0001350494,0.000062027946,0.00008840671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006613504,0.00006229839,0.00015717615,0.0000025350093,0.00022675846,0.000044744716,0.00015240657,0.00002999447,0.000020441457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038856582,0.000029576204,0.000038279268,0.00009444579,0.00037854988,0.00009317379,0.000037969286,0.00005091855,0.0000064686387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023236173,0.00005253722,0.005594374,0.0032493433,0.00007684141,0.0000019080974,0.024152273,1.341261e-7,0.000009687951,0.70907056,0.0136364885,0.24413262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069673915,0.000012183225,0.00017904727,0.00087068265,0.00003666985,0.0000011919556,0.00042808813,2.0280561e-7,0.0000030369997,0.0016698882,0.99668163,0.000047701094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07932496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15046498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98304516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007101307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007181118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9268059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2505598889","doi":"10.29173/alr352","title":"Navigating the Quagmire of Oil and Gas Transactions with Income Trusts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Oil Sands Technology and Research Authority","funders":"","keywords":"Database transaction; Transaction cost; Business; Fossil fuel; Asset (computer security); Focus (optics); Energy law; Petroleum industry; Economics; Public economics; Law; Finance; Political science; Environmental law","score_opus":0.026666769372819962,"score_gpt":0.3232781554594928,"score_spread":0.2966113860866728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2505598889","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06017475,0.300756,0.000059877802,0.103510916,0.000336838,0.00070391665,0.000006240022,0.000057736615,0.5343937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817719,0.016601745,0.000033243046,0.0005817404,0.00007152652,0.00002511157,5.739063e-7,0.0000068897434,0.0009072633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921286,0.0001531241,0.00019023755,0.00009930744,0.00022224782,0.00012220665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999381,0.00020151932,0.0001153633,0.000110761895,0.00010384003,0.000087490705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006365641,0.00006559132,0.00021790959,0.0000025446325,0.0002788466,0.000029202422,0.00012371193,0.000030024703,0.000036050777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013381273,0.00003687296,0.000031269978,0.0002465615,0.00027750127,0.00017767817,0.0000064854626,0.00011264565,0.000008090948],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021662365,0.00008987641,0.0019087404,0.006551536,0.00012434568,0.0000044364624,0.05435525,0.0000049158443,0.000008372494,0.5135044,0.0006578124,0.42276865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016036323,0.000039385744,0.000023225457,0.0070643113,0.000096174575,0.000008168551,0.0012885865,0.000002984896,0.000011478645,0.00072808634,0.99045855,0.00011870661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22312714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23944442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9898007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014715386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011581085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78204614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508827122","doi":"10.29173/alr253","title":"Assessment and Analysis of the Decision of the Alberta Court of Appeal in &lt;i&gt;OMERS Energy v. Alberta (Energy Resources Conservation Board)&lt;/i&gt;","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Upstream (networking); Energy law; Energy (signal processing); Law; Political science; Energy conservation; Energy resources; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Environmental economics; Environmental law; Engineering; Physics","score_opus":0.014386768502257313,"score_gpt":0.28742922953165007,"score_spread":0.2730424610293928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508827122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4833626,0.17695382,0.000083217885,0.013475841,0.00087453844,0.0013574975,0.000028971132,0.00001180497,0.3238517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98041487,0.01721146,0.000024784269,0.000942427,0.0000577878,0.00002979222,0.000006636335,0.000013473138,0.0012987736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676746,0.00080956635,0.0010269426,0.00027270408,0.00078911375,0.00033420377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960602,0.0020840473,0.0009934687,0.0005401056,0.00021313784,0.0001090443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014933886,0.00019929135,0.0009385414,0.00009060265,0.00025409614,0.00002444102,0.00059647707,0.00014248288,0.00011261762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007927962,0.00012080524,0.00034194632,0.0020573724,0.00060950615,0.0002860545,0.00018441847,0.00008694653,8.921449e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017447715,0.00019002026,0.10069598,0.00064435275,0.00043420264,1.2029994e-7,0.0028284222,0.000023788714,0.0004060851,0.88806635,0.0019081584,0.004785038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021598498,0.000030314766,0.061469182,0.002488023,0.00094565755,6.500872e-7,0.000112126465,0.00009035263,0.000117357915,0.00052194553,0.93381935,0.0001890501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5963979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9319112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007556225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000195346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4926295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509552618","doi":"10.29173/alr240","title":"Maternal Substance Abuse and the Limits of Law: A Relational Challenge","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Tort; Intervention (counseling); Substance use; Liability; Criminology; Psychology; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.057549962499129186,"score_gpt":0.30239467018303545,"score_spread":0.24484470768390626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509552618","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057034805,0.3552822,0.0000036443564,0.010533201,0.00013262134,0.0005877926,0.0000024629844,0.000013577059,0.5764097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7592757,0.23863855,0.000012745372,0.0009622991,0.00010074161,0.000017068101,5.701337e-7,0.0000042491115,0.0009880849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990811,0.00016505455,0.0002529007,0.00011505057,0.00026047105,0.00012546904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992425,0.00036479687,0.00014689832,0.00011074501,0.00008743875,0.000047635385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049539196,0.00006711095,0.00025632067,0.000004744171,0.0003884922,0.00001162956,0.00013897746,0.00003934479,0.00012564496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007997369,0.000041978623,0.000056242436,0.00009548013,0.0006841362,0.00017825337,0.000006329876,0.0000654107,0.000036637604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063560205,0.000009442999,0.0004456469,0.00030983542,0.000010940139,0.0000012724714,0.005458859,6.845866e-8,5.06613e-7,0.993411,0.00019811124,0.0001479267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025259517,0.000011215758,0.00037861208,0.0015065685,0.000028027762,0.00000780437,0.000021571368,8.475483e-7,0.0000060342504,0.0037590351,0.9939531,0.00007459137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10340089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.116197065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.993755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010057495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035160378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90256965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2511357307","doi":"10.29173/alr236","title":"Recent Judicial Developments of Interest to Oil and Gas Lawyers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freehold; Law; Business; Confidentiality; Fossil fuel; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.05593790568919646,"score_gpt":0.3355935593943845,"score_spread":0.2796556537051881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2511357307","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017338548,0.072745115,0.0000018238136,0.050871324,0.00035436827,0.00031966963,0.000001973709,0.00002349171,0.85834366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72543204,0.25934988,0.00010986451,0.013208486,0.00019378065,0.000014929173,0.0000028242498,0.000008744397,0.0016794436],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902594,0.00009230172,0.00032329335,0.00017534236,0.00017454312,0.00020855882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944735,0.000075852455,0.0001075917,0.00009958953,0.000113684655,0.00015590628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046135078,0.00009251162,0.00032291227,0.000017769458,0.0001746007,0.000029286875,0.0001725128,0.000045443496,0.0001241682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048020744,0.0000787011,0.00003527249,0.00031183547,0.00008863194,0.00012799475,0.000031285315,0.000053796757,0.00005920339],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067949813,0.00003580296,0.00013934702,0.00041351424,0.000014043747,0.0000014232851,0.0016752434,2.8553629e-8,0.000024757985,0.32147884,0.0050630854,0.6711471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006368782,0.000040124185,0.00012271618,0.0026737095,0.000020202227,8.1046755e-7,0.000045289686,3.5383366e-8,0.00003643698,0.00094427,0.9959514,0.00010130652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03428706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09764895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9908883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036735644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010906987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9721437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512581135","doi":"10.29173/alr255","title":"Regulatory and Liability Issues in Horizontal Multi-Stage Fracturing","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Imperial Oil (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Context (archaeology); Energy law; Liability; Unconventional oil; Fossil fuel; Subject (documents); Process (computing); Political science; Business; Economics; Law and economics; Law; Environmental law; Engineering; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.04528024000301092,"score_gpt":0.3651734046056263,"score_spread":0.3198931646026154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512581135","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2510344,0.6030959,0.0000036161719,0.003693726,0.00047547717,0.0010828933,0.0000024919293,0.00004673923,0.14056475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97726125,0.02013627,0.00005566714,0.000611096,0.0002866849,0.00002357843,0.000001125292,0.000008404447,0.0016159421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988465,0.00022123956,0.0002644169,0.00017508079,0.0001810855,0.0003116894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994227,0.00017210886,0.00008410753,0.00014765801,0.000028322958,0.00014507692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013133481,0.000101522135,0.0003091379,0.000012190385,0.00020605553,0.000037160236,0.00011670511,0.000075168515,0.00017878029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004913352,0.00008512291,0.000045948054,0.0001399601,0.00017162421,0.0006178584,0.000044658715,0.00010941201,0.000049262024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075617513,0.00031102498,0.21574867,0.00694864,0.000029867198,0.000004214126,0.017432237,1.9430425e-7,0.000055380555,0.73689556,0.0012536328,0.021313021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000754066,0.000007831744,0.008885208,0.0010816097,0.000011956042,5.42335e-7,0.00015797187,5.5969036e-7,0.000038179238,0.0000955394,0.9895168,0.00012839661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28755358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1660623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9882632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005727745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003731259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8491549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515759044","doi":"10.29173/alr361","title":"\"Practical Necessity\" or \"Highly Sophisticated Opportunism\"? Judicial Review and Rate Regulation After ATCO Gas and Pipelines Ltd. v. Alberta (Energyand Utilties Board)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Opportunism; Pipeline transport; Business; Engineering; Law; Political science; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.06880607552981717,"score_gpt":0.3501502890439015,"score_spread":0.28134421351408434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2515759044","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023201702,0.6817489,0.00005313874,0.20187943,0.0007062503,0.0022334186,0.00001539116,0.00009753132,0.110945776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39582196,0.5737232,0.00017803545,0.018148867,0.00081958703,0.00016209946,0.000038916525,0.0000484019,0.011058901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969945,0.00074356113,0.0008060886,0.0005541027,0.00045209905,0.00044965986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975009,0.0007693517,0.00039994527,0.00032655522,0.0004348365,0.00056843477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017446687,0.000331378,0.001029081,0.000035502915,0.00046311817,0.00020822257,0.00019082623,0.00018543929,0.0004590472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003975891,0.00024303465,0.00008689785,0.00043633123,0.00066260895,0.0008618094,0.00013305717,0.00017955864,0.0000796956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036945465,0.00023249647,0.0017131229,0.021685818,0.00024084192,0.00010405757,0.002286856,2.4213944e-7,0.00001604095,0.69352484,0.2618098,0.01801641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028826098,0.00007432672,0.00012322264,0.0064314893,0.00070907886,0.000027173079,0.000056053734,0.000010159849,0.000005082656,0.0025764485,0.9893251,0.00037361067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11101916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14265358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7275153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005278159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004871405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9910665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W251828165","doi":"","title":"Refining the Test for Discrimination in the Context of Special Education: Moore v British Columbia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Special education; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Test (biology); Christian ministry; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.012364503626463534,"score_gpt":0.2736648334698175,"score_spread":0.261300329843354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W251828165","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90116984,0.0041914177,0.00018310315,0.02643112,0.0012336082,0.001211961,0.0000083795,0.00001547732,0.065555096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928115,0.00040719172,0.000008318073,0.0002116761,0.002822908,0.000055308385,0.0000012730776,0.000005437322,0.0036764122],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868286,0.00012726508,0.00023698373,0.000078513556,0.00026117993,0.0006131745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991819,0.00030230614,0.00018799299,0.000057679037,0.0002473454,0.000022777367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023155105,0.000039930288,0.00009706608,0.000017159366,0.00075167214,0.00047693079,0.00032576523,0.0000446578,0.00007614157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000850498,0.000033772045,0.000053110125,0.00020408462,0.00012469348,0.00029323407,0.000008335667,0.0004126517,0.0000037580066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008773838,0.00024700828,0.032588936,0.000024851957,0.000028752487,3.8211203e-7,0.040628746,0.0000010246583,0.000045631394,0.29504156,0.03280949,0.5985748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003873223,0.0002258407,0.024569998,0.000112675385,0.000023732511,0.000044181827,0.41101113,0.000006569354,0.0000037492318,0.4805731,0.082922824,0.000118906646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29339665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90937096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6159743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027832223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002930757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71130866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521244895","doi":"","title":"The Law, Psychiatry and Pathologization of Sex Reassignment Surgery for Transgender Ontarians","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transgender; Mental health; Legislation; Political science; Gender dysphoria; Human rights; Sex reassignment surgery (male-to-female); Health care; Law; Medicine; Sociology; Gender studies; Psychiatry; Transsexual","score_opus":0.014692220745295461,"score_gpt":0.26512151889228297,"score_spread":0.2504292981469875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521244895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58529186,0.029715866,0.25498453,0.10697601,0.0036164715,0.0016082386,0.00002722577,0.00010381783,0.017675979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930834,0.005764203,0.000019728364,0.000048889884,0.0003911186,0.000007819236,2.18395e-7,0.0000061661895,0.00067845755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867654,0.00012360112,0.00021165423,0.00008738832,0.00018277254,0.00071804237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994536,0.00023735517,0.00014499486,0.000049244547,0.00007402747,0.000040763098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031997487,0.0000544995,0.00010954941,0.000018350358,0.00073563866,0.000038148253,0.000095686984,0.000056466488,0.000004297471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008679641,0.000028830265,0.00006360958,0.000058005382,0.00015105466,0.00013684921,0.0000041697012,0.00013513929,4.2785985e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040016195,0.000022837847,0.010148064,0.0000070010874,0.000043458447,1.2584528e-7,0.0014535808,2.8001074e-7,0.00017114719,0.95520204,0.00013587833,0.03277555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043478515,0.00019078107,0.0012057718,0.000057360376,0.00003397515,0.00001942092,0.0184058,9.860165e-7,0.00009663071,0.9463536,0.03307902,0.000121879886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022615322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07513409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40779155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019482496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019935663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9417423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527691255","doi":"10.29173/alr433","title":"Toward Tort Liability for Bad Samaritans","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Liability; Strict liability; Delict; Declaration; Political science; Punishment (psychology); Common law; Joint and several liability; Private law; Public law; Psychology; Black letter law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04618932793106224,"score_gpt":0.3396519297527077,"score_spread":0.29346260182164546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527691255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00070898334,0.060142707,0.00037479034,0.089617185,0.00101809,0.0025988377,0.000024894107,0.00008902789,0.8454255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94301605,0.03287697,0.00014310524,0.0064303516,0.0010400091,0.00034227216,0.000003841169,0.000023170816,0.016124226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987752,0.00012842975,0.00031408123,0.00025945026,0.00021800572,0.00030487328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860215,0.00077091483,0.00009832336,0.0002239509,0.00016951477,0.00013513601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010413158,0.00010437615,0.00034092338,0.0000062551444,0.00029152646,0.00003784487,0.00027020916,0.00007527016,0.00056072883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019431354,0.0000637512,0.00016414953,0.00014078678,0.00019023726,0.00029639015,0.000028020133,0.00003411275,0.00018948439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037902985,0.00002746781,0.0007524366,0.0012141101,0.00001477441,3.3922936e-7,0.00035992335,3.0099971e-9,0.0000100836405,0.9550313,0.014910159,0.02767566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094842195,0.00002602609,0.00006144543,0.0016183995,0.000035739016,3.8665928e-7,0.000016890654,5.813208e-8,0.000016444532,0.0066094035,0.9913973,0.00012307067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0832018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0825239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97648716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081064856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016514807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93421763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528344651","doi":"","title":"Employee Drug Testing: Orwellian Vision or Pragmatic Approach to Problems in the Workforce","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Human rights; Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Legislation; Political science; Civil liberties; Charter; Legitimacy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.0695673268313307,"score_gpt":0.3514494775894099,"score_spread":0.2818821507580792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528344651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6979675,0.00703301,0.000097230586,0.011246123,0.0005309621,0.0013110965,0.0000036052388,0.000064198524,0.28174627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922421,0.0005595466,0.00074083277,0.00060309307,0.0007704098,0.00002415446,2.5147116e-7,0.000016626982,0.005043002],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972597,0.00041580095,0.0007569253,0.00018380952,0.0009625364,0.00042124293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846506,0.00060318445,0.00031480903,0.00013595229,0.00035631543,0.00012467057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034902503,0.00018023825,0.00048325758,0.00011740205,0.00074230257,0.00029770643,0.0006435338,0.000056478908,0.000030634477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013768811,0.00009692743,0.000087972425,0.0014025891,0.00021105097,0.0005951629,0.000046306093,0.000359363,0.000022498638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003853327,0.0010968822,0.03363407,0.0005513129,0.0002983099,0.00025715487,0.77776176,0.009401926,0.00005892645,0.005448622,0.07848728,0.09261842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009925856,0.0008829628,0.009733049,0.0018518191,0.00010586877,0.000119780285,0.091824755,0.000032776446,0.000009809727,0.0037601376,0.89016736,0.000519126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033243853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052194856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8116801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011931859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002606453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5709266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528473891","doi":"10.3138/9781442687592-010","title":"Appendix: The Progression of Canadian Drug Law – Key Events","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); Drug; Law; Political science; Computer science; Medicine; Computer security; Pharmacology","score_opus":0.02328979632383903,"score_gpt":0.23223993962474326,"score_spread":0.20895014330090422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528473891","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000037836497,0.002859045,0.0000011274606,0.000089144465,0.00020657181,0.00048510224,0.000085890424,0.000020989013,0.9962143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.068547584,0.0016320742,0.000036778598,0.00002608635,0.00017461437,3.5402584e-7,0.0000109436605,0.000017103783,0.92955446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881124,0.00007077943,0.00016775414,0.0002051009,0.00051287364,0.00023226434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894536,0.000043044256,0.0003683635,0.0002427046,0.00021471294,0.00018582404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021688934,0.00015372483,0.0003129294,0.0000374252,0.0007728924,0.000011216665,0.0006973069,0.00025193402,0.00034457966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008541391,0.00013984148,0.00015136092,0.000003103154,0.00072939857,0.00013638253,0.000107724445,0.00014341214,0.0000093828785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046532903,0.000014001768,0.00001994445,0.000114494644,0.0001299401,0.000028666904,0.07977956,9.892092e-7,0.0000039998445,0.8850996,0.030251361,0.0045109303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013360093,0.000024283754,0.000012162675,0.00030834367,0.000053290856,5.498364e-7,0.00053747837,4.479995e-7,0.00002436719,0.00042017165,0.9983423,0.00014302903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9968584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99473226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9680909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021459728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005930869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59445417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529612912","doi":"","title":"When All Else Fails, Blame the Parents: An Analysis of Parental Responsibility Laws in Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Juvenile delinquency; Economic Justice; Law; Criminology; Poverty; Moral responsibility; Political science; Legal responsibility; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.043616866470318885,"score_gpt":0.3376268931768372,"score_spread":0.2940100267065183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529612912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909185,0.0038936865,0.000005477939,0.0029155763,0.00037578173,0.00013161254,0.000019543353,0.0000060485654,0.0017337821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99838674,0.0010290188,0.000019208728,0.00023770278,0.00022202183,0.000003156083,0.0000013783333,0.0000067536507,0.00009399141],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690866,0.0006678919,0.0009207351,0.00017522504,0.0009859977,0.00034149532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801135,0.00040071554,0.0006939573,0.00018878891,0.0005712559,0.0001339181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002576651,0.00014579522,0.00073105906,0.0001762135,0.00031917798,0.000083785104,0.0005148084,0.000047272202,0.000040291397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009945772,0.0000943385,0.00017391566,0.00095541973,0.00031555162,0.0007219677,0.00007799291,0.0002533908,5.080569e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033975192,0.00021058929,0.93797743,0.000023005912,0.0016792427,0.00018991466,0.054055512,0.00067384454,0.000046329038,0.0013826637,0.0015073204,0.0019144163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007458312,0.0002955084,0.5016062,0.0001383454,0.0010822292,0.000012945371,0.35635749,0.00007514949,0.000047580368,0.0016829316,0.1376213,0.0003344587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96733326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43637118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071120687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014646793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38470125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529726430","doi":"10.3138/9781442671669-003","title":"Mack v. Attorney General of Canada: Equality, History, and Reparation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03772428112565787,"score_gpt":0.2365762163895333,"score_spread":0.19885193526387543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529726430","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014946531,0.0050219633,0.000011024516,0.000031394706,0.00021797308,0.00018963474,0.000060047078,0.000015231087,0.9943033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017315857,0.00048502343,0.00007124183,0.000019697718,0.0002705978,1.020711e-7,0.000005727805,0.000008942147,0.9818228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990263,0.00004867149,0.00018514783,0.00020483589,0.00039671973,0.00013832733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991695,0.00002676688,0.00034126945,0.00014929952,0.00020346556,0.00010967971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019571604,0.00012280942,0.00032439263,0.00001158447,0.00015345373,0.000006375996,0.00021794035,0.0002140851,0.00035764402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011748068,0.00015413572,0.00006257124,5.925576e-7,0.0003359494,0.00011941563,0.00008447526,0.000073712166,3.0882265e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005857183,0.000007704742,0.000014058801,0.00015912337,0.000091895345,0.0000066832467,0.01866719,0.0000035371143,0.000037268077,0.92987967,0.048730016,0.0023442602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013663153,0.00002487757,0.000030975178,0.00007393539,0.000056930803,2.9347538e-7,0.00013550713,0.0000055693185,0.000013986115,0.00021605435,0.99915767,0.00014758753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99804235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99815786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95042765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012866178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013039624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62854725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529794700","doi":"","title":"A Practical Guide to Appellate Judging","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Trial court; Political science; Supreme court; Law of the case; Economic Justice; Court of record; Remand (court procedure); Sociology; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.05537421702774193,"score_gpt":0.4255470423250415,"score_spread":0.37017282529729956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529794700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24611926,0.00639745,0.010162352,0.3166722,0.0016237883,0.0009783468,0.000002553646,0.000081564394,0.41796246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937088,0.0010806127,0.0010966253,0.0021207815,0.001154019,0.0000011770256,9.726562e-8,0.000015514383,0.00082240446],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767953,0.0005277579,0.0004924377,0.00012097414,0.00085031515,0.00032900862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966387,0.0008926511,0.0006803095,0.00011382581,0.0012125819,0.00046192994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009060234,0.0001251598,0.00025535992,0.0000829031,0.00043683397,0.0002701514,0.00031032716,0.00008730861,0.000021125225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005713218,0.0000812691,0.00003869744,0.0004918131,0.00014641813,0.0014753735,0.000064272666,0.00040971398,0.00008107166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007548728,0.00069118437,0.002266789,0.00047086418,0.0007302668,0.0005839176,0.6594687,0.002055286,0.0009957,0.022371689,0.2418598,0.060957063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041081358,0.00028770845,0.000020309757,0.00012503132,0.00018089302,0.00049688685,0.07849803,0.00003044591,0.0003504063,0.00406051,0.9153735,0.00016546532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017956273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017469522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7475895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005661286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010233264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6839668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530012025","doi":"10.34961/8424","title":"The devil in the detail: property division under British Columbia' s Family Law Act 2011","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Property (philosophy); Law; Political science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.016084813069506838,"score_gpt":0.19946759908236483,"score_spread":0.18338278601285798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530012025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83190507,0.00081321556,0.0015501855,0.0022256055,0.00045191153,0.0005056561,0.000025870642,0.00005790143,0.16246457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905051,0.00065831,0.00011563125,0.00007015233,0.000061000286,1.4080716e-7,0.0000022606946,0.0000050390595,0.008582365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805075,0.0004149534,0.00019159072,0.0002979858,0.00074317184,0.00030152572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986237,0.00034434375,0.00032749207,0.00024572955,0.00035350522,0.000105171406],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006515168,0.00010713241,0.0002558089,0.00004224242,0.0041753114,0.00008403261,0.0010017618,0.00013282831,0.00010813279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005181276,0.0000935016,0.00017408101,0.00041988157,0.0036800331,0.0008733998,0.00017243225,0.00015314936,0.00003094905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028134664,0.005050945,0.31858674,0.0005627422,0.0021727441,0.0030968867,0.08768516,0.0007715185,0.040037353,0.33172196,0.086563654,0.12093685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011841451,0.00033654584,0.1796356,0.00036586117,0.00011662601,0.000026880916,0.06352157,0.000018255196,0.000046000503,0.0005452451,0.7538104,0.00039287747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5767241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20311421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66724676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024191895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008959176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99903136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2535315963","doi":"10.5703/1288284316229","title":"The Long Arm of the Law: Privacy Explored","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Purdue Pharma (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Law; Internet privacy; Computer security; Political science","score_opus":0.02994724360585235,"score_gpt":0.29074652168074006,"score_spread":0.26079927807488773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2535315963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16614838,0.00034100897,0.0001998387,0.03592294,0.0008161018,0.00033057222,0.0000014699921,0.00005626112,0.7961834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883963,0.000069944246,0.0000045893594,0.00013721357,0.0002315541,0.000007065085,1.6053379e-8,0.0000030336507,0.011150272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993085,0.00008618983,0.00012133148,0.000068734495,0.00026556326,0.0001496656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994537,0.00021169239,0.000069793015,0.00015699788,0.00007685583,0.000030934232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044436494,0.000035985326,0.000059496586,0.000004094075,0.0006219914,0.00004191645,0.00039723353,0.000029493085,0.00010268057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029409467,0.0000117683985,0.00004556569,0.00011580744,0.00041738598,0.00014963886,0.000059018363,0.000025398005,0.000027369835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043811574,0.000016566186,0.0039291442,0.0000037096954,0.000007391964,1.6501818e-7,0.00491138,5.0169884e-8,0.0003210674,0.98075706,0.0026010785,0.007448023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022398487,0.000026805565,0.007573932,0.0000756867,0.000007920717,2.5443393e-7,0.0049075834,4.1745915e-7,0.009814069,0.06735417,0.90991527,0.00009992197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014249157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020241052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91340286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001940203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008948356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2535591805","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316585481.015","title":"McBoyle v. United States","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.015543595569036405,"score_gpt":0.3157554521773973,"score_spread":0.3002118566083609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2535591805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000022841195,0.00042485507,0.00013181745,0.0014791817,0.00051821506,0.00016025332,0.000025294376,0.00043836384,0.99681973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005485078,0.0010191384,0.000026096484,0.00037630933,0.0017554114,0.000007672527,0.000017517319,0.00012686201,0.9961225],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992029,0.0000659865,0.000095696785,0.00014949382,0.0002556308,0.0002302867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962837,0.000042108142,0.000091335176,0.00010115694,0.00004417798,0.00009284577],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016340478,0.00010103686,0.00015556326,0.00014659743,0.00012828647,0.00005738216,0.00019347499,0.0002130748,0.04373254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050042727,0.000066063316,0.00003525823,0.00018070955,0.00014979654,0.00003953517,0.000020662363,0.000051724768,0.0032458233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.43267e-7,0.000005646777,0.000028278533,0.000015133583,0.000013665882,0.0000014633196,0.00042722502,1.289919e-8,5.1781785e-7,0.052406788,0.9460759,0.0010247356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059368143,0.00000503655,0.0000011296062,0.00010064853,0.0000049734613,5.304139e-8,0.0005954945,1.406058e-7,0.0000025641414,0.0017943792,0.9973063,0.00012994051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21781571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053718507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1640972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003421116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013040075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2537570604","doi":"10.29173/alr456","title":"Englander v. Telus: Protection of Privacy in the Private Sector Goes to the Federal Court of Appeal","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Personally identifiable information; Parliament; Subject (documents); The Internet; Internet privacy; Supreme court; Business; Private sector; Private information retrieval; Law; Political science; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.033039218718509344,"score_gpt":0.3018146509869245,"score_spread":0.26877543226841516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2537570604","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33511803,0.055176735,0.0004992047,0.39766237,0.0011299261,0.01589038,0.000020538388,0.00006327731,0.19443955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951036,0.0031105627,0.0000077207405,0.0011490491,0.00020160706,0.00010528303,3.1848882e-7,0.0000058540945,0.00031599958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986246,0.00041672337,0.0003413214,0.00013065108,0.00031378487,0.0001729155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919254,0.00029293046,0.00018390622,0.00021505475,0.0000835104,0.000032040058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013786666,0.000080237405,0.00025803433,0.0000126338255,0.00017813883,0.000023125414,0.0003985757,0.000041964562,0.00007395117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006207209,0.000032312404,0.00006935652,0.00032613557,0.00012939893,0.00013679739,0.00003957584,0.000063668434,0.000025616055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008274868,0.0003257933,0.012430016,0.006354498,0.00013134822,0.0000021988378,0.047566973,0.0000016781428,0.0011610644,0.84237754,0.0105728675,0.078993276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012368776,0.00005380497,0.0011391633,0.0027148735,0.000016526528,9.836937e-7,0.000115973635,2.415209e-7,0.00014060445,0.0008116134,0.994814,0.000068570225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09242567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98424107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027325388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007526282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9227867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2538980895","doi":"","title":"The Cost Recovery Act and Tobacco Litigation in Canada: A Model for Fast Food Litigation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Tobacco industry; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.01760770313621708,"score_gpt":0.25644350460337956,"score_spread":0.2388358014671625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2538980895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92387956,0.0008870373,0.003666489,0.024126694,0.0017708106,0.00087273883,0.000046658097,0.000008715472,0.044741273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984608,0.00013401371,0.00017266248,0.00033920878,0.0004163329,0.00002340223,0.0000023733269,0.0000051621187,0.00044600535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989943,0.000047068304,0.00036175744,0.0000713634,0.00038482517,0.00014067133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873257,0.00027386134,0.00028753377,0.000034234203,0.0005949014,0.00007690283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051845645,0.000057418285,0.000101995545,0.000035761168,0.00023806287,0.00022588349,0.0001938557,0.00003610089,0.000012022469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036271545,0.000043086973,0.000039117913,0.00005825023,0.00006974727,0.0007438099,0.000014184202,0.00009488106,9.538688e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012227372,0.0000402697,0.023841707,0.00002096791,0.00010477013,0.000002311307,0.0034639987,0.0022120187,0.0001761354,0.9132238,0.004090448,0.052701283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039821784,0.0005731501,0.090660304,0.0011996854,0.00005500329,0.00005399428,0.016641451,0.042108152,0.0010402275,0.5135018,0.32938758,0.0007964426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53700304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9526038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4156008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040484816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001131602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4660801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2546431366","doi":"10.29173/alr465","title":"Inadequate Reasons: The Need for Tribunal Participation in Judicial Review Litigation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03927509320099208,"score_gpt":0.3639145121851825,"score_spread":0.3246394189841904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2546431366","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014908108,0.5238528,0.00022498975,0.39314818,0.0005988509,0.006609861,0.000017108354,0.00005390755,0.074003465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65930897,0.32457855,0.0000152116445,0.013406067,0.00056884286,0.0010884069,0.0000129317805,0.000014856146,0.0010061623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815154,0.0005039679,0.0005410161,0.00020535314,0.0002804894,0.00031762925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982557,0.0010501526,0.0002558997,0.00018672702,0.00017202979,0.000079462094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026079942,0.000109479595,0.00037638447,0.000013614203,0.00034151642,0.00003616474,0.0002290123,0.000061063736,0.00017061403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004738571,0.00005954351,0.00011651656,0.00044263713,0.00016227907,0.00036986824,0.000018852566,0.000060604933,0.000099557605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010295805,0.000034700155,0.00027720924,0.0030499047,0.000012913846,4.1936693e-7,0.00045227865,5.1356658e-8,0.000007700973,0.8860371,0.015624466,0.09449296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020053837,0.000028950722,0.0001688792,0.026030269,0.00008414092,3.9629862e-7,0.000017645036,9.597409e-7,0.00001213723,0.007902345,0.96544045,0.00011330064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05178145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.109098464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.949816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000089956964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018176039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9545328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2547332279","doi":"10.29173/alr775","title":"Next Up: A Proposal for Values-Based Law Reform on Unilateral Withholding and Withdrawal of Potentially Life-Sustaining Treatment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; State (computer science); Political science; Common law; Law reform; Public law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04003853548056559,"score_gpt":0.342337364744946,"score_spread":0.30229882926438045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2547332279","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0757337,0.038497616,0.00010497345,0.046805482,0.0016943661,0.010460899,0.00003632425,0.00013658962,0.82653004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99556595,0.0016332291,0.00022425092,0.0009487037,0.00023873034,0.00008712408,0.000006348821,0.000019773812,0.0012758779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987037,0.000093507566,0.00035599095,0.00027968892,0.00025348592,0.00031361094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883354,0.00012578446,0.00041710728,0.00031177662,0.0001566925,0.00015512772],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062581775,0.00017629813,0.0005217362,0.000016399712,0.0014205063,0.00025259715,0.0002599639,0.00007727039,0.000018904226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028573218,0.00012243072,0.00012765083,0.0000584019,0.00041089236,0.00045040814,0.000033867946,0.00005784452,0.0000039514407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008429723,0.00006353608,0.00024309658,0.0018552879,0.00006873615,0.0000031767659,0.0015471604,0.000001875732,0.000021891276,0.9867872,0.000061935134,0.009261834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002439024,0.0018626514,0.00016565179,0.013975638,0.00053859735,0.0000036162778,0.0005484176,0.0000945047,0.0004063273,0.0056181992,0.97371244,0.0006349285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26330045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.086891554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.981169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012200439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048586997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2548370312","doi":"10.29173/alr463","title":"Regulating Hydraulic Fracturing: Regulatory Recourse for Subsurface Communication","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hydraulic fracturing; Harm; Jurisdiction; Production (economics); Order (exchange); Liability; Business; Compensation (psychology); Law; Petroleum engineering; Geology; Economics; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.03130227233156364,"score_gpt":0.3279236359648988,"score_spread":0.2966213636333352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2548370312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012225526,0.2843221,0.00024548956,0.11760747,0.0006385439,0.0031705396,0.000008306149,0.00019917304,0.58158284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9490596,0.039831515,0.00028633256,0.0031625384,0.00032063047,0.00011708996,0.000005959769,0.000026151716,0.0071901665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985717,0.00027164622,0.00038857252,0.00022923178,0.0002499032,0.00028894527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978977,0.0010333828,0.00030166958,0.00046964738,0.00018635544,0.000111262816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015766583,0.00011817058,0.000308217,0.000012582273,0.00068496115,0.000047799862,0.00037219192,0.000093391165,0.00018220977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012534007,0.00008231295,0.00012305658,0.00015278929,0.00020256637,0.0004628268,0.000039375234,0.000059204966,0.00009565559],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010748325,0.0000453188,0.0005846826,0.003773293,0.000045503435,3.0928237e-7,0.0015264071,4.793993e-7,0.00011796851,0.89001316,0.025470888,0.07841125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001296577,0.000012712217,0.0001107446,0.010585752,0.000033703538,6.6617486e-7,0.000042927026,7.371172e-7,0.00019210148,0.003885606,0.9848532,0.00015220245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021894608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02555463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9593823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009381588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011951016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9922265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560639850","doi":"","title":"U.S. Drug Court: A Building Block For Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Block (permutation group theory); Mathematics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.025403605069868575,"score_gpt":0.23117829764253867,"score_spread":0.2057746925726701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560639850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34398323,0.0007393922,0.0030410676,0.011591443,0.002767177,0.0013140913,0.00016845849,0.00034590057,0.6360492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93710816,0.000016099952,0.00009365354,0.00014226315,0.0004924663,8.051654e-7,0.0000012392101,0.00001480439,0.06213054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872077,0.000072521514,0.00013890577,0.00026712063,0.00034279964,0.00045786874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992268,0.00012735001,0.000113079135,0.00014182569,0.00018757423,0.00020335028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020537371,0.00013203117,0.00019531444,0.00010802135,0.0007981227,0.00008411155,0.0004051334,0.0001026186,0.00018528035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007047025,0.0001481104,0.00007836666,0.0005165437,0.0001104362,0.0002013818,0.000050409217,0.0001450857,0.000025010062],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006402943,0.0009308546,0.102345616,0.00084443676,0.0010462409,0.0009349431,0.1713281,0.0017407198,0.00046590233,0.44455108,0.19776356,0.077408254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005301344,0.000015797057,0.000075616044,0.00007968175,0.000039380328,0.0000013506178,0.017633874,0.00029513089,0.000017000582,0.00014795178,0.98089576,0.00026834966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5406217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8794186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7831322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020590714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033233067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61385953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564813398","doi":"10.3138/cbmh.20.1.208","title":"From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice Allen Buchanan, Dan W. Brock, Norman Daniels, and Daniel Wikler","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Health History","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Criminology; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04254316171467316,"score_gpt":0.29606575603534246,"score_spread":0.2535225943206693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564813398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46619135,0.46339992,0.00047179562,0.016549334,0.008840864,0.00078090787,0.000043111548,0.000026039672,0.04369668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875657,0.001789132,0.00035070864,0.006922365,0.001287179,0.0000024235092,7.7536566e-7,0.000020339086,0.0020613554],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985844,0.00021578003,0.00038332815,0.00016668218,0.00023192674,0.00041787766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978099,0.000072979085,0.00028740804,0.000096553056,0.00018196859,0.0015512132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006470082,0.00010740297,0.00027134447,0.00014782537,0.0006726731,0.00004328092,0.00016723924,0.00009079612,0.000034700923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037646925,0.000113384376,0.000023391533,0.00009181422,0.00016125018,0.00018321555,0.000007639233,0.00021029421,0.0000029939545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019845229,0.000037874866,0.015226913,0.00033518087,0.00006680634,0.00010162817,0.19385795,0.000023704877,0.00017834871,0.0074160118,0.75786465,0.024871087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016953675,0.0001270874,0.0026938994,0.00010977136,0.00001606524,0.00001048763,0.0049521704,0.0000014833423,0.0000032689006,0.00015983985,0.9916347,0.00012167283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32503077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75269216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52137434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095517916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053054267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9411599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566677771","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2854522","title":"Integrating Climate Change into EA: Thoughts on Federal Law Reform","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Law reform; Environmental law; Political science; Federal law; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Legislation","score_opus":0.01929999479391651,"score_gpt":0.30068315380329763,"score_spread":0.2813831590093811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566677771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2513091,0.0053828056,0.0013641544,0.044719934,0.0034118278,0.0007741122,0.0000068474774,0.00035368773,0.69267756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98757285,0.0039882367,0.000022290644,0.00042608732,0.0065683634,0.000013322186,3.7568748e-7,0.000019188965,0.0013892637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966785,0.00016790039,0.00028142246,0.00019835106,0.00046212864,0.0022117014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937093,0.00006038459,0.00020794735,0.00009791321,0.00012616166,0.00013664398],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027015551,0.00014623934,0.00019662567,0.000059719066,0.0019231971,0.00019873852,0.00031693428,0.00011717017,0.000022353997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011711107,0.00008350567,0.00010259734,0.00017970933,0.00014260501,0.00075030496,0.000034882683,0.0007878767,0.00010677839],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032719123,0.000022167518,0.00027734134,0.000004762837,0.00002033884,0.000003034846,0.0041875993,3.3902168e-8,0.00013621384,0.93987894,0.000027690394,0.05540913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072259025,0.00070936023,0.00010453981,0.00047439255,0.000015972124,0.00004449802,0.018899962,0.0000019890101,0.00036190893,0.85912323,0.11916903,0.00037255633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019153783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2670569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73626375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025855643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008900327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567168204","doi":"","title":"Same-Sex Marriage and the Constitution : The Civil Marriage Act (Canada) Considered, Part 1","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hōgaku shinpō","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.010396073148679024,"score_gpt":0.2254141503759062,"score_spread":0.21501807722722718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2567168204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05873895,0.003329565,0.00006348142,0.030813644,0.0014897289,0.00090587535,0.000041845018,0.00009878174,0.9045181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927641,0.00014628941,0.0000073963192,0.0015571453,0.0012072407,0.000030072915,0.000004086515,0.000007537787,0.004276112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981398,0.00043422138,0.00027537742,0.00022704512,0.0005670957,0.00035646127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987438,0.00072444015,0.00015185191,0.00021646719,0.00008021363,0.00008327746],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015477159,0.00013942392,0.00022773429,0.000017521186,0.0018454219,0.00034338204,0.00026829398,0.00009065623,0.00031625666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005761652,0.00007968071,0.000054074044,0.00020515574,0.0016043404,0.00020489182,0.000060113303,0.00019676352,0.00001728675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047602276,0.000021175383,0.008474933,0.000025353675,0.000033595148,0.000025140882,0.0032180182,0.000016467435,0.00002611295,0.81367236,0.1729534,0.0014858189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006246852,0.000008289073,0.0031506007,0.00003462212,0.000034451423,0.0000042433808,0.0035302828,0.000025042465,0.000048748603,0.022396982,0.96997607,0.00016596355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8332379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9559065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93402517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008994972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009937035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2570829184","doi":"","title":"Halsbury's Laws of Canada in Context","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.009436389660185094,"score_gpt":0.1889700245784419,"score_spread":0.1795336349182568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2570829184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56221116,0.0000782939,0.000014749931,0.07110906,0.00023416884,0.00024329791,0.000023750916,0.00008322753,0.3660023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8984515,0.00015376539,0.000042322357,0.00017128114,0.000062320425,1.9368659e-7,0.0000020368057,0.000006842593,0.10110972],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897957,0.00014768819,0.000115864954,0.00017097619,0.0003041447,0.0002817764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994896,0.00009453177,0.00010010332,0.00011562686,0.00004817622,0.00015194465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006282388,0.00008826086,0.00021944547,0.00009756632,0.00033924635,0.000013743229,0.00030956062,0.00008772541,0.000312154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005552139,0.00009987781,0.00004395812,0.00059970055,0.00023740175,0.0009123698,0.00007000262,0.00011795348,0.0000055841856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008246477,0.000085667234,0.19949995,0.000053234144,0.000027540551,0.000560276,0.01479411,0.000025744424,0.0000043213367,0.081535816,0.7030948,0.00023608339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029980656,0.00002568211,0.015441984,0.000046396508,0.0000045163733,1.330499e-7,0.013210174,4.975156e-7,0.0004389543,0.00025509257,0.97011554,0.00016124781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99121106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91618437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33624035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014142405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002292114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40728992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587304703","doi":"","title":"The Evolution of Consumer Privacy Law: How Privacy by Design Can Benefit from Insights in Commercial Law and Standardization","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Personally identifiable information; Privacy by Design; Business; Consumer protection; Temptation; Standardization; Transferability; Information privacy; Information privacy law; Limiting; Internet privacy; Privacy policy; FTC Fair Information Practice; Law and economics; Law; Computer science; Economics; Political science; Incentive; Microeconomics; Engineering","score_opus":0.019592488692547372,"score_gpt":0.2636593672511173,"score_spread":0.24406687855856996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587304703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93599474,0.027142966,0.0027559686,0.0036926416,0.001054947,0.0014989938,0.0001783911,0.000110567,0.027570775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987737,0.0002717518,0.00014473828,0.0002667787,0.0003741538,0.000017651242,0.000012404061,0.000014651784,0.00012418654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825966,0.00039313044,0.00029318943,0.00020386587,0.00047447404,0.00037570085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989094,0.00032246212,0.00020153305,0.00020588218,0.0001659422,0.00019477955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008097821,0.00014036728,0.00025855386,0.000024703897,0.0010062493,0.00023671026,0.0002665087,0.00016161833,0.000020797886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026407346,0.000111682304,0.00003588075,0.00024498472,0.00057598663,0.0008661692,0.00007492214,0.00017788704,0.000006149451],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000667395,0.0000758904,0.023131344,0.000019889307,0.0000324371,6.26366e-7,0.010468864,0.000010759254,0.00089666556,0.96266294,0.0019654792,0.00066834455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011570826,0.000078213954,0.010943598,0.00016073468,0.00005352472,4.85371e-7,0.0030404893,0.000015440159,0.0038087363,0.05379052,0.9265559,0.00039532533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34973454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19642973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92459035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028857353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017891881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8182333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592300480","doi":"","title":"R. V. Safarzadeh-Markhali: Elements and Implications of the Supreme Court's New Rigorous Approach to Construction of Statutory Purpose","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Statutory law; Law; Statutory interpretation; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.019048617900382345,"score_gpt":0.26969926271533595,"score_spread":0.2506506448149536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592300480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7963945,0.0011088056,0.0030695747,0.010206596,0.00090903795,0.002108416,0.00021985019,0.00009923762,0.18588395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967525,0.00007441972,0.0011559431,0.00016945809,0.0002146571,0.000023469425,0.0000012697894,0.000009346607,0.0015989642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986913,0.00014360959,0.0003566753,0.00021981465,0.0003569218,0.00023167023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990269,0.00007985261,0.00023043057,0.00026144506,0.00019559034,0.00020581346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046879257,0.00009531081,0.00019895981,0.0000336706,0.00033002623,0.000040574876,0.00029523706,0.00008588358,0.00008526393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022675344,0.00006219273,0.000050594976,0.00028164656,0.00045894246,0.0002836806,0.00007741803,0.000074957825,0.000010413976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003310475,0.000097022144,0.064608596,0.00007128484,0.000051670235,1.3964379e-7,0.0024055887,0.0000023344248,0.009687087,0.89774853,0.0073265606,0.017968109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013204596,0.00014329723,0.07677668,0.00027859205,0.000088867906,0.000005622463,0.0034164821,0.0000014957435,0.0049013332,0.06216695,0.8504897,0.00041056026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025177391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00736804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8431631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007740822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036799398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98131406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593594836","doi":"","title":"ESTs under Canadian Patent Law: Useful or Not?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patent law; Law; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.03759961730365224,"score_gpt":0.2727977674909791,"score_spread":0.23519815018732687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593594836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22626218,0.00066790753,0.0000360184,0.008215683,0.0016118579,0.00060011056,0.000058942544,0.00027481947,0.7622725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770105,0.000020879877,0.000058560832,0.004073558,0.0016339781,0.000025775636,0.0000100135085,0.00002476648,0.01714195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797624,0.00013311954,0.00030186187,0.00033532857,0.00051916577,0.0007342953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988596,0.00007373289,0.000089607754,0.00022971813,0.00015614751,0.00059122057],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047906674,0.0001696866,0.00023519107,0.000052290194,0.0012563188,0.00042648506,0.0003530707,0.00020479457,0.0011908662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008639274,0.00014489592,0.00008019167,0.0003458275,0.0002780017,0.0004960367,0.000031488646,0.00020670441,0.0010013935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002266692,0.00004191919,0.004794015,0.000020884685,0.00001660456,0.00006369671,0.0004942781,0.00004944248,0.00005828502,0.9788519,0.015350783,0.00023553628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002750433,0.000033169883,0.0067512025,0.00004954659,0.000014799003,0.0000023913653,0.00062200637,0.0000029495563,0.00020003473,0.010885786,0.98087,0.00029308323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99195886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9679661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041070709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010258767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595840443","doi":"","title":"The Law of Privacy in Canada (Student Edition). By Barbara A. McIsaac, Rick Shields, Kris Klein (Toronto: Thomson Carswell, 2004)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shields; Law; History; Art history; Political science; Engineering; Electrical engineering","score_opus":0.008122435637651802,"score_gpt":0.2591764783519739,"score_spread":0.2510540427143221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595840443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50808364,0.037823047,0.000069835565,0.014227228,0.004933272,0.001958613,0.00019360607,0.00015838625,0.4325524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99664056,0.00063001434,0.000032266245,0.0008946335,0.0009140081,0.00005230649,0.0000092512155,0.000020063471,0.0008068766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711275,0.00022247934,0.00057682744,0.0003464899,0.0011104965,0.00063093216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998776,0.00019077107,0.00023177895,0.00035374815,0.00016100192,0.0002866801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084657193,0.0002060219,0.00035080814,0.000014510122,0.0009039262,0.00018977746,0.0007923859,0.00015397069,0.00024263677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018981914,0.00016772687,0.00008371824,0.000311973,0.00031703693,0.00062683364,0.00009203346,0.00031209592,0.000035249584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074198775,0.00036614118,0.02417042,0.000116655036,0.00011393963,0.000051743187,0.0122069465,0.00032591884,0.00036465525,0.83982444,0.120864205,0.0015207286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008362003,0.00007400681,0.0040302034,0.00014956189,0.000021530977,0.0000010604132,0.009427914,0.0000016816261,0.0008735315,0.0064139855,0.9778148,0.00035553353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9987791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8569506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018280889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020450256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6952361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598412328","doi":"","title":"Dedication: The Honorable Jerome Turner","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œUniversity of Memphis law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Nothing; Reputation; Memphis; Uncanny; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.018583760170405837,"score_gpt":0.24998113565672303,"score_spread":0.2313973754863172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2598412328","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045010312,0.12296274,0.000021857813,0.044294152,0.00013752273,0.0008087082,0.000007319655,0.000065349544,0.8272013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8940952,0.08855217,0.000019193345,0.0022974797,0.00019384493,0.0000011191676,0.0000018334208,0.0000049204646,0.014834271],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990293,0.0002633141,0.000120964505,0.00011784156,0.0003202369,0.00014835842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993995,0.000101935606,0.00011033935,0.00024317317,0.00008538271,0.000059673537],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009959629,0.000063352054,0.00018991117,0.0000070249635,0.0011872387,0.000020454805,0.00063098693,0.00004475405,0.0046220864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001929327,0.00004041227,0.00010397728,0.0002766824,0.0006041892,0.0001835431,0.000030176245,0.00009013756,0.00043487942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034471523,0.00017217103,0.00044938255,0.002253879,0.0001741409,0.00001551116,0.020263415,0.000009298654,0.000017532779,0.48643658,0.3189989,0.17117472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006150449,0.0000086140635,0.00014512002,0.00042449636,0.000062164836,0.0000010064775,0.0005582593,0.0000010332,0.0000011205128,0.00068058824,0.9979997,0.000056382978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03335472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013773785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88959414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000406776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000116865376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599661567","doi":"10.11575/prism/30032","title":"Lost in Translation: Examining Alberta's Duty to Consult Policy and the Challenge Government Faces when Policies are Imposed on them by the Judicial System","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Duty; Political science; Public policy; Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.07151754644638478,"score_gpt":0.3165587576489407,"score_spread":0.24504121120255593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599661567","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42485133,0.00029382983,0.000006492279,0.099060595,0.000116908195,0.0013255583,0.00007632001,0.000003018887,0.47426596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960104,0.00006734241,0.000009112956,0.00031546995,0.00038820994,0.000049434697,4.2397886e-7,0.000008940812,0.003150623],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983537,0.0003479309,0.00027233863,0.00026127737,0.00047387826,0.00029087567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984336,0.0011140404,0.00016136498,0.0001677466,0.000036350335,0.000086914275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012614466,0.00013336234,0.00025996804,0.000018985718,0.0005587272,0.0003368592,0.0005143824,0.000079598176,0.00016841032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038957215,0.00006227262,0.000025180057,0.0001830199,0.00032809298,0.0002158026,0.00009188578,0.00007727396,0.00010875693],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009036981,0.00014274941,0.006914354,0.000045617297,0.00011453423,0.0000075837747,0.62952685,0.000004229892,0.00062994723,0.090960175,0.0033609886,0.26738927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005153992,0.00024864223,0.0036143449,0.0013138704,0.000048471105,0.000004712786,0.23623751,0.000014745398,0.0012797979,0.0015286669,0.7499873,0.00056795724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1156585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.117689356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7466263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018930458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001438795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8984105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602021631","doi":"10.11575/prism/30049","title":"Compliance, Not Enforcement: A Comparative Evaluation of Best Practice Regulation for Hydraulic Fracturing","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Enforcement; Hydraulic fracturing; Business; Best practice; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Petroleum engineering; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.47301032253752456,"score_gpt":0.5114695262236514,"score_spread":0.03845920368612682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602021631","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08316497,0.00017281498,0.0012643937,0.0009166254,0.00023925568,0.0021101744,0.000011492303,0.0000018192172,0.91211843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99655783,0.00000279989,0.0020724759,0.000044779572,0.00019501001,0.00005773263,0.000013206628,0.0000036227354,0.0010525282],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998689,0.00019189139,0.00023118421,0.00015157304,0.0006117077,0.00012464036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817055,0.00018297973,0.00034753655,0.00008976977,0.0011418969,0.00006726781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032428068,0.00005844606,0.00016063641,0.00002798892,0.0002326138,0.00014720618,0.00020217849,0.000047805464,0.00030365834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008253687,0.00005624514,0.000021422788,0.00015741862,0.00006972452,0.001080021,0.000037125028,0.00003766735,0.00007787375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001693327,0.0010707971,0.0006433542,0.00011378198,0.00028680198,0.0000012567652,0.5183375,0.01373259,0.001929216,0.034768052,0.009195327,0.41822803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013743839,0.0001944952,0.00012692795,0.00017181353,0.0001298531,4.579686e-7,0.03400105,0.0062931566,0.005846138,0.0024809195,0.9492345,0.00014630637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010546419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022811943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94003916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013022781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005240825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99604243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603315218","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1321","title":"Out of Sync: Section 8 and Technological Advancement in Supreme Court Jurisprudence","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Charter; Supreme court; Statutory law; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Enforcement; Phone; Law enforcement; Internet privacy; Sociology; Computer science; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.05558990262627044,"score_gpt":0.34674789400514555,"score_spread":0.2911579913788751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603315218","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044530176,0.7210228,0.001485299,0.037374333,0.0030419694,0.005547035,0.00002927975,0.00049022975,0.18647888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94004565,0.058980912,0.00014834273,0.00035082988,0.00015991725,0.000056683697,0.0000021143317,0.000008576379,0.00024699996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814165,0.00022162002,0.00048556045,0.00028609615,0.0005742545,0.00029079668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991512,0.000066155975,0.0001864475,0.0001925497,0.00026847192,0.00013519923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00238485,0.00013607994,0.00048311954,0.00003946189,0.0001254349,0.000031942756,0.00025404987,0.00013601266,0.00006123345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006358607,0.000113526105,0.00005188391,0.0003540383,0.0004523476,0.00034505094,0.00008374957,0.00017432489,0.000022326863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084199826,0.00062356977,0.02194339,0.008740944,0.00007819958,0.000052028907,0.0056050434,0.0000135739465,0.00080976426,0.89368796,0.019622386,0.04873892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021415373,0.00009782712,0.00016310897,0.0029486849,0.000029294302,0.0000023035182,0.0004467424,0.000004728568,0.0000890862,0.0036824541,0.9921543,0.00016732948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049641635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010958764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9725319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013886401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018415826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75043637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604920721","doi":"","title":"Drawing Lines In The Disappearing Sand: A Re-Evaluation Of Shoreline Rights And Regimes A Quarter Century After Bell v. Town Of Wells","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ocean and coastal law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Shore; Oceanography; Archaeology; Geology; Geography","score_opus":0.025946072450838385,"score_gpt":0.2741303071459205,"score_spread":0.24818423469508213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604920721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.949919,0.0017270776,0.000010290614,0.00024016757,0.000088471665,0.00011580325,0.0000033586548,0.0000027024835,0.047893126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995368,0.00013848823,0.00003267339,0.000037051297,0.00021216947,7.4827824e-7,4.51613e-7,0.000002973791,0.000038641298],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897015,0.00019181908,0.0002619203,0.000084883344,0.00036295623,0.00012828497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995926,0.000040239647,0.00014270702,0.00004878003,0.00012534698,0.000050300976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015964919,0.000064230226,0.00014167765,0.000036880752,0.00021609262,0.000058806745,0.00008030976,0.000044157896,0.000058977577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029348026,0.000039540337,0.000033450153,0.00008937746,0.00022083556,0.0002439687,0.000024138348,0.00011113844,2.0675166e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009595053,0.00061077834,0.10511079,0.0002892286,0.00014194856,0.000065416476,0.79373467,0.000009883327,0.000536315,0.07056088,0.001733919,0.026246658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009535185,0.002237174,0.1481142,0.0059251552,0.0009588669,0.00027095104,0.40315604,0.00079266296,0.003951918,0.31675684,0.106632434,0.0016685433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014127801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018217016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39057863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000070217484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003987964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605077909","doi":"10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.80","title":"Competency to Stand Trial in the American Legal System","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Competence (human resources); Officer; Psychology; Law; Mental illness; Criminal justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Criminal procedure; Mental health; Social psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.08126889273112033,"score_gpt":0.45396468085595,"score_spread":0.3726957881248297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605077909","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059644743,0.0020653198,0.00004307882,0.0071279807,0.0034248934,0.0024850934,0.00015282481,0.00003979922,0.9786965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15816042,0.6875553,0.0001979637,0.0005933214,0.02145451,0.001655345,0.000042338896,0.00014130311,0.13019948],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900396,0.0043441155,0.0009913944,0.00080791576,0.0023813942,0.001435599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960662,0.0017554503,0.00049818645,0.0007630394,0.0006057694,0.00031131436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073506483,0.0003139087,0.0011283448,0.0008796771,0.00052597775,0.00012432328,0.0023591255,0.0004802631,0.00014337881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016738795,0.00019627254,0.00018692884,0.002134289,0.0015880917,0.00016318032,0.00019754794,0.0014083282,0.000107443826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008135598,0.00045324583,0.0007954917,0.000700664,0.00008826718,0.00019164047,0.008059635,1.651798e-7,0.0000012975929,0.08398539,0.5944888,0.30309984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032551563,0.001328946,0.00051719183,0.0007147283,0.000012522287,0.000003939246,0.0060220184,6.810065e-8,1.6305964e-7,0.0012877418,0.9866235,0.00023402639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025557483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018227177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84849703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038806073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003100524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606300689","doi":"","title":"No Right to Assisted Suicide Under European Human Rights Convention","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Human rights; Supreme court; Political science; Convention; Conscience; Fundamental rights; International human rights law","score_opus":0.022068586053874656,"score_gpt":0.30806097198189053,"score_spread":0.2859923859280159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606300689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13380098,0.0008164526,0.0042329123,0.00080234633,0.00092024135,0.0002740321,9.525257e-7,0.00009544009,0.85905665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96245325,0.0000590598,0.000023707384,0.00015709011,0.0008666985,0.0000023563978,0.0000014710618,0.000018089278,0.036418274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652094,0.00075812225,0.00032963918,0.00020505866,0.00046346255,0.0017227591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921453,0.000030322068,0.000176312,0.000108311775,0.00025047336,0.0002200558],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004091861,0.00013115795,0.00017395626,0.00010239134,0.0020970393,0.00021992714,0.0002834159,0.00006871291,0.00036489012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011838556,0.000110079716,0.00011135811,0.0003329818,0.0000801426,0.000292509,0.000013951604,0.00076538394,0.00059334165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007701185,0.00005289883,0.0003098115,0.0000028109068,0.000053109972,0.000007685792,0.00037079505,0.0000033851773,0.0006722208,0.9973878,0.0007045156,0.00042721754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045460093,0.00021552722,0.00082833297,0.00004992779,0.000029694498,0.000053137275,0.0009391467,3.3672055e-7,0.00019838264,0.38182342,0.61516875,0.00023874584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064422293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08164951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82865226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094599946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010512229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607152550","doi":"","title":"St. John's University School of Law: A Profile","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œCatholic lawyer","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02678458915965182,"score_gpt":0.2933177452194329,"score_spread":0.26653315605978106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607152550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1956581,0.00009384969,0.000017201803,0.0016846019,0.00029515338,0.00029333992,0.00002554919,0.000047163692,0.80188507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97867686,0.00002612494,0.000036997244,0.00014292201,0.00040730566,0.0000029726052,8.608851e-7,0.0000068299782,0.020699132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911207,0.00009251225,0.000113630806,0.00015229278,0.00029888118,0.00023060146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990743,0.000043357868,0.00020432418,0.000425557,0.00014954814,0.00010290892],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062193413,0.00007483503,0.00015388937,0.000019475292,0.0018981159,0.00012501037,0.0007667688,0.00008733979,0.00032611607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000106126965,0.000055672375,0.000070756985,0.000078530524,0.00064616755,0.0003685161,0.00012484394,0.00011962285,0.00018707057],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053429987,0.00013927523,0.008142923,0.000084453306,0.000062328254,0.000029444374,0.03139658,0.0000020867255,0.0006876191,0.9423495,0.013708868,0.0033434944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019672242,0.00001680468,0.00520091,0.000027985245,0.000019255143,7.413172e-7,0.0011974848,0.0000030335557,0.000118067626,0.003336306,0.98978496,0.00009771537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11409448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037353683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9760761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054245545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027352278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2608062544","doi":"10.29173/alr519","title":"Recent Legislative and Regulatory Developments of Interest to Oil and Gas Lawyers","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Calgary Laboratory Services","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Nova scotia; Energy law; Political science; Fossil fuel; Petroleum industry; Law; Public administration; Environmental law; Engineering; Sociology; Waste management","score_opus":0.04583144941291671,"score_gpt":0.31347088161861675,"score_spread":0.2676394322057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2608062544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.083848216,0.097405866,2.2214817e-7,0.009848014,0.00009008894,0.00023287344,0.0000019487788,0.000011243157,0.8085615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5315252,0.45346415,0.00008544894,0.0033161845,0.000074080825,0.000024861074,0.0000018839393,0.0000112326925,0.011496992],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991833,0.00010951418,0.00024757668,0.00017679635,0.000129098,0.00015369496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995396,0.00009746373,0.00007115404,0.00008946137,0.000069315814,0.00013301041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039936675,0.00008481441,0.0002731654,0.000012005189,0.0001614573,0.000025586605,0.00009500459,0.000038865557,0.0003511131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016220367,0.00007068403,0.000020198533,0.00018961974,0.00019085011,0.0001615841,0.000029942341,0.00004403057,0.00003346418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007971247,0.000018143191,0.00044468767,0.0008022834,0.000027265174,9.626807e-7,0.006077405,4.218232e-8,0.000009448491,0.121341914,0.0021115404,0.8691583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006415769,0.00001891909,0.00023249399,0.0026466742,0.000017349079,0.0000010662756,0.000067379115,6.519355e-8,0.000016866012,0.00029825553,0.99654615,0.00009065009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036374096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.077391535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025687132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007279286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97004277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2608571048","doi":"","title":"Of Neighbours and Netizens, Or, Duty of Care in the Tech Age: A Comment on Cooper v. Hobart","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Cooper pair; Duty of care; Sociology; Law; Political science; Physics; Condensed matter physics; Superconductivity","score_opus":0.017258769762707158,"score_gpt":0.28612123636849524,"score_spread":0.26886246660578805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2608571048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8722677,0.0023067102,0.000007886527,0.015221648,0.00023437539,0.0008920661,0.000028715172,0.00003372637,0.10900717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99799913,0.00013293451,0.00004239674,0.0015786445,0.000097501514,0.00001587919,0.0000018451099,0.0000067157475,0.00012493395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886954,0.00014599063,0.00024082778,0.00015364664,0.00038479394,0.00020519632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946314,0.0000997527,0.000101754216,0.00016930104,0.000094886,0.0000711896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005101982,0.00009179657,0.0002312988,0.00003137276,0.00020786271,0.000051746334,0.0002470514,0.00008837329,0.000051696356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016413671,0.000059700564,0.000037683934,0.0003252924,0.000312227,0.00010345399,0.000034302982,0.00016094174,0.0000072054577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025918012,0.00030676325,0.011765069,0.00033827807,0.000029048048,0.00004781099,0.050976478,0.000105684834,0.00033747082,0.9302544,0.0039730323,0.0016068025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034310673,0.0016049481,0.018381977,0.0011826227,0.00005194992,0.0000043861824,0.073372275,0.0000010017975,0.0034028655,0.014261011,0.8838088,0.00049710955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.092757255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09235288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9159934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066902205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001864836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9242093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2608578223","doi":"","title":"Review of Approaches to and Best Practices in the Regulation of Hydraulic Fracturing in Canada: Appendix M of the Final Report of the Newfoundland & Labrador Hydraulic Fracturing Review Panel","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hydraulic fracturing; Best practice; Engineering; Environmental planning; Petroleum engineering; Law; Political science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.14152971420338187,"score_gpt":0.3215966750295495,"score_spread":0.1800669608261676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2608578223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7285441,0.19396973,0.0000124786775,0.02610728,0.00034025294,0.0030324075,0.000016489988,0.0000085902975,0.047968645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990598,0.008677898,0.000015964362,0.000284549,0.000112957336,0.000036834437,0.000001106617,0.000010079394,0.00026261047],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717945,0.00070141576,0.0010553235,0.00027724658,0.00054627657,0.00024028997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966744,0.00069883355,0.001878494,0.00052067614,0.00017427883,0.00005329992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031606066,0.00016075544,0.0006117426,0.00005312801,0.00014285152,0.000013403296,0.00065442425,0.00007581967,0.000039066348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003379038,0.00007767397,0.00009599503,0.0009005374,0.0002581741,0.0002968945,0.00014893296,0.00018618327,0.0000022445513],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018348685,0.0013760261,0.57290596,0.12973061,0.00028937648,0.00002491593,0.05795549,0.00010513284,0.0024840808,0.015992748,0.010299913,0.20865226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006122454,0.00009196822,0.42719448,0.11116664,0.00024773646,0.000039392064,0.0023089391,0.000013461536,0.0025906044,0.0011769906,0.4541651,0.0003924463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7714013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9343905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44386518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016610538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013153362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40452683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2608806802","doi":"10.29173/alr521","title":"Recent Judicial Developments of Interest to Oil and Gas Lawyers","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Energy law; Petroleum industry; Law; Fossil fuel; Economics; Cover (algebra); Law and economics; Business; Political science; Environmental law; Environmental science; Engineering","score_opus":0.051009606954392175,"score_gpt":0.3241699117892353,"score_spread":0.27316030483484316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2608806802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032249823,0.048275944,3.0350617e-7,0.016483843,0.00020234469,0.00022698779,0.0000022640193,0.000016065942,0.9025424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4304145,0.5524794,0.00008647574,0.008661159,0.00022170202,0.000039354945,0.000003953543,0.000016113408,0.008077314],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899703,0.00010821354,0.0003278865,0.00018211175,0.00017313134,0.00021161845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949443,0.00008778091,0.000074667245,0.00010305969,0.000083278246,0.00015678839],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004312092,0.000092831986,0.00031553255,0.00001380164,0.000190585,0.000028671913,0.00017406633,0.000045615012,0.0012781916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002520025,0.00007945484,0.000035401823,0.00030518835,0.00012988641,0.00012760129,0.00003078607,0.000052828,0.00020693157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008357621,0.000027852473,0.00017955517,0.0005995597,0.000019496314,0.0000012579698,0.0017895063,5.5000037e-8,0.0000064557403,0.08805656,0.004584364,0.904727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064928994,0.000020876232,0.00005260141,0.0025799223,0.000020841671,9.083535e-7,0.00003781909,4.495834e-8,0.000019448415,0.00032064508,0.9967815,0.00010043109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08775933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1787206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99219716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003391209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010892181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609094498","doi":"10.29173/alr490","title":"Recent Regulatory and Legislative Developments of Interest to Oil and Gas Lawyers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Energy law; Fossil fuel; Political science; Business; Public administration; Law; Environmental law; Engineering","score_opus":0.07631261855110284,"score_gpt":0.3192058481914503,"score_spread":0.24289322964034749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2609094498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04266779,0.18114907,0.0000028782051,0.09598604,0.00019826338,0.00048718287,0.0000044980284,0.000025993499,0.6794783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77945876,0.20934732,0.00010901104,0.009843874,0.00010185315,0.000018910803,0.0000017612574,0.000011031409,0.0011074984],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921626,0.00010203659,0.0002396392,0.00018421281,0.00012635962,0.00013149416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994667,0.000099084624,0.00009727405,0.00005866068,0.00008322996,0.00019504857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028760743,0.00008082456,0.0002856274,0.000008211715,0.00012576992,0.000024426978,0.00009954692,0.000033849366,0.000062003746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049524376,0.00006795061,0.000019771389,0.00021376408,0.00015691997,0.00014239029,0.000068694055,0.000048138692,0.000017907048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018068375,0.000023536326,0.001316416,0.0036721008,0.00007147449,0.0000026765897,0.028802535,6.775705e-8,0.00007777103,0.47662446,0.0076458403,0.48174506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006371618,0.000027112708,0.00010789891,0.0019022549,0.00001885974,4.4241168e-7,0.00015919303,1.548752e-7,0.00003851071,0.00015538913,0.9974402,0.000086269894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01615589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039473806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9897944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018617384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008215261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9903956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609726810","doi":"10.29173/alr499","title":"Recent Judicial Developments of Interest to Oil and Gas Lawyers","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freehold; Fossil fuel; Energy law; Law; Government (linguistics); Business; Judicial review; Conveyancing; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Environmental law; Engineering","score_opus":0.061356951221785465,"score_gpt":0.3290709010426418,"score_spread":0.26771394982085633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2609726810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011451568,0.0634288,0.0000018666467,0.008870152,0.00041337794,0.00024785777,0.000001493264,0.000013131574,0.91557175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6602513,0.32873717,0.0001947507,0.007342855,0.00012475198,0.000044906817,0.0000023949624,0.000017935141,0.0032839342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894404,0.00017061438,0.00032238517,0.00017942462,0.00016949144,0.00021403955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993998,0.000111832705,0.00010713987,0.00010204894,0.00012029781,0.0001589291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006477887,0.000093172945,0.00031569632,0.000016671154,0.00018801495,0.000026824075,0.00013739563,0.00004582834,0.00025535806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010269195,0.00007989611,0.00003434821,0.00032784045,0.000120314035,0.00011155602,0.00003117887,0.000053065003,0.0000764845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040523973,0.000034699464,0.00050948194,0.00089976593,0.000025767586,0.0000013762573,0.0018202333,3.2579987e-8,0.000016609689,0.81777877,0.0044013523,0.17450789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006661398,0.00001857801,0.000025823085,0.0021216471,0.00002102904,0.0000010681422,0.000079817044,1.3678662e-8,0.00006417149,0.00068938284,0.99681056,0.00010129223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04007321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15000321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9924092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038502345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000158479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.966319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611272792","doi":"","title":"The Fictitious Payee After Teva v. BMO: Has the Pendulum Swung Back Far Enough?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Cheque; Accounts payable; Business; Payment; Negotiable instrument; Accounting; Finance; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.022483142883396832,"score_gpt":0.2643073849316903,"score_spread":0.24182424204829348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611272792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021475706,0.002281488,0.00040460308,0.12181347,0.0016589196,0.0006738003,0.000012660595,0.00015937263,0.85152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9273441,0.00038046608,0.000012419557,0.0007761693,0.0010928807,0.000046098467,2.17979e-7,0.000011145534,0.07033653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984875,0.00020260164,0.00021626014,0.00020428977,0.00044384075,0.00044551402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896544,0.00047137658,0.00007946417,0.00026117518,0.00013168289,0.00009085465],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087079266,0.00011191043,0.000117074596,0.000013076187,0.0018837274,0.0004792837,0.0004785186,0.00008891631,0.002226961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029339976,0.000041345593,0.000084362866,0.00018818982,0.00062988774,0.0003071669,0.00007313426,0.00009356863,0.0016856593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097825396,0.00011835484,0.016022697,0.000035179066,0.00013450913,0.00002259358,0.02899896,8.1563246e-7,0.00054387364,0.535256,0.34524438,0.07352479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011875076,0.000023602679,0.0020255903,0.000021787862,0.00000812083,0.0000010481224,0.00375427,9.3231216e-7,0.00012265683,0.0045389635,0.9892722,0.00011210372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029165199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07184555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90586835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006555139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002271564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612851079","doi":"","title":"Bush V. Gore: Is the Bloom Off the Robes?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Appeal; Political science; Economic Justice; Humanities; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.01065162298600387,"score_gpt":0.2720273898845859,"score_spread":0.26137576689858205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612851079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4172424,0.07845435,0.0015462189,0.26154217,0.0019707293,0.00080537726,0.000003453298,0.00014664553,0.23828866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9567381,0.023983723,0.0000022026716,0.0013261562,0.0028015089,0.000006022209,2.24369e-7,0.000012762585,0.01512931],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968564,0.00026872984,0.00023821715,0.00014122025,0.00058660196,0.0019088241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992936,0.00012906028,0.00018049074,0.0001686879,0.00014641498,0.00008171013],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004159839,0.00011314735,0.0001327334,0.000028825907,0.0025854872,0.00031684866,0.0007857219,0.00008334087,0.00021826717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020156344,0.000057632154,0.00013307577,0.0004892246,0.0002516403,0.0002619612,0.00003540328,0.001432845,0.00011727461],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003755055,0.00007396319,0.0056280983,0.000003166966,0.00021088679,0.000008160369,0.015429642,0.000014045611,0.00004188772,0.8715874,0.014493962,0.092471264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017394619,0.0000642957,0.00035540102,0.00001278495,0.00003115064,0.000112088266,0.019048475,0.0000087718445,0.000007389343,0.23994564,0.7401399,0.000100148936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009867461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042686623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72564596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041866384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027726481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613004266","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2818892","title":"The Law, Psychiatry and Pathologization of Gender-Confirming Surgery for Transgender Ontarians","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Transgender; Psychology; Sex reassignment surgery (male-to-female); Psychiatry; Psychoanalysis; Transsexual","score_opus":0.0353946780033841,"score_gpt":0.3105931860668426,"score_spread":0.2751985080634585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613004266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86235404,0.02537627,0.051176354,0.026713576,0.0041910904,0.0009983578,0.000011869479,0.000056388297,0.02912208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99563795,0.0034859811,0.00003229402,0.00004140899,0.0005748278,0.00000524961,3.7262384e-7,0.0000071566437,0.00021477697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865663,0.000078510326,0.00021433979,0.00009541532,0.00016749243,0.00078758365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930996,0.00013555549,0.000304597,0.00009805146,0.00011078687,0.00004107643],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036159486,0.00006156495,0.0001316465,0.000019609988,0.0035617258,0.00020144967,0.00021550918,0.00007117974,0.0000023745617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021490401,0.000043764627,0.00008199706,0.000028971543,0.00024022193,0.00025698193,0.000008265779,0.00028359413,2.9949814e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027426924,0.000014111189,0.014551047,0.000014241192,0.00004479459,2.3368952e-7,0.0023137112,0.0000012965985,0.000037560334,0.9725382,0.000046490575,0.010410903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003658893,0.00009447347,0.005280504,0.000035805977,0.00005344936,0.000029060919,0.026637223,0.000009894924,0.000031571446,0.9504208,0.01689746,0.00014384965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071361056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20212756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19499145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093769224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023191113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613302742","doi":"10.29173/alr482","title":"Recent Judicial Decisions of Interest to Oil and Gas Lawyers","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Creditor; Energy law; Law; Fossil fuel; Judicial opinion; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Environmental law; Finance","score_opus":0.07317393158328371,"score_gpt":0.3524954744657324,"score_spread":0.27932154288244865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613302742","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013381607,0.1517489,0.0000057634275,0.1020191,0.00035635944,0.0003205069,0.000005097338,0.000024097464,0.7321386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5189917,0.46989188,0.00014838933,0.008492548,0.000490766,0.000026941801,0.00000204874,0.0000129715145,0.0019427391],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989534,0.000115201256,0.0003610124,0.00018550095,0.00017739293,0.0002074971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908596,0.00033073244,0.00010639845,0.00015034381,0.00013099986,0.00019554573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056586263,0.00009045906,0.00033735577,0.000020439658,0.00021569805,0.00003207233,0.00020061547,0.00005036037,0.0003789546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001358052,0.00007436409,0.00005625977,0.00032759111,0.00015335284,0.00015872884,0.000062379026,0.00006612009,0.00015369173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047548624,0.00003119451,0.00005117615,0.00018113616,0.000011349965,5.7126516e-7,0.0010728759,1.9175326e-7,0.000011946584,0.33212715,0.010262304,0.65624535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006226857,0.0000262268,0.000013519706,0.0027607009,0.000030657095,0.000001054215,0.00006363717,2.7183052e-7,0.000020345358,0.0005830252,0.99634767,0.00009060544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062360074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4455103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98608536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003688332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008914171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9438838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613414015","doi":"","title":"Emerging privacy torts in Canada and New Zealand: an English perspective","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"City Research Online (City University London)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Internet privacy; Political science; Law; Business; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.04916275944464213,"score_gpt":0.33591559154947787,"score_spread":0.2867528321048357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613414015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9873848,0.000061479666,0.000016510545,0.004404,0.00013474107,0.00025370021,0.000030016523,0.000043642554,0.0076710973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961155,0.0002000574,0.00008133646,0.00006541769,0.00064604066,2.7901416e-7,0.000011163106,0.0000073946912,0.0028728063],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972599,0.0007183506,0.00013478992,0.0004274835,0.00083162356,0.00062785286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814,0.00029245066,0.000054789507,0.0002056399,0.0006973409,0.0006097813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001438085,0.000113900336,0.00025409408,0.00021486271,0.0008083218,0.00010589962,0.0005032666,0.000086571024,0.0000698981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00164678,0.00012962495,0.000029660712,0.00086380576,0.00028736013,0.0008209586,0.0002558214,0.0005813101,0.0000011791824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018383758,0.00022561017,0.8975865,0.00003742416,0.000029266634,0.00010622742,0.059789494,0.000025633844,0.0000277813,0.026438387,0.006907314,0.0086424835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011911897,0.00016767,0.27972585,0.000094059,0.000011448653,0.0000012577324,0.068738475,0.00029489087,0.000021536032,0.004279146,0.6450668,0.00040769158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99899936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63815945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018375862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043361518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76921475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613481975","doi":"10.29173/alr506","title":"Recent Developments of Interest to Oil and Gas Lawyers","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Energy law; Fossil fuel; Business; Law; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Environmental law; Engineering; Waste management","score_opus":0.08627037069827513,"score_gpt":0.3214399244744216,"score_spread":0.23516955377614646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613481975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007005156,0.12466288,5.9485484e-7,0.024779817,0.00021857455,0.00018620462,0.0000012519412,0.000013147372,0.8431324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39756197,0.58792424,0.00008705909,0.0058137146,0.00008958238,0.000028173474,0.0000011942711,0.000010553792,0.008483507],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992121,0.000081658465,0.00025714008,0.00014511519,0.0001364058,0.00016762379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995159,0.00008975612,0.00008282062,0.00009450068,0.00008512954,0.0001319122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003135693,0.00007352914,0.0002475537,0.000012572654,0.00013782467,0.000024645477,0.00014502896,0.000033594446,0.0005879824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041193026,0.00006082775,0.000027056707,0.00025687143,0.00009038371,0.00011149007,0.000042829874,0.00004076947,0.00016764496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021387389,0.000044812856,0.00042126336,0.0015660042,0.000026773314,0.0000015969526,0.0038322662,2.7338487e-8,0.000011658587,0.23048164,0.016521057,0.74709076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004419947,0.000014283675,0.000019171031,0.0024302956,0.000013797462,7.548115e-7,0.00004700463,1.14829845e-7,0.000016701228,0.000119896664,0.9972146,0.00007919371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033714548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10256135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9806935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027598127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026219997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616937611","doi":"10.29173/alr491","title":"Recent Judicial Developments of Interests to Oil and Gas Lawyers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Creditor; Energy law; Fossil fuel; Law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Environmental law; Finance; Engineering","score_opus":0.03285363821762997,"score_gpt":0.3395869987280314,"score_spread":0.3067333605104014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616937611","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021398338,0.03643096,0.0000025407735,0.017151095,0.0006704584,0.0002879554,0.0000020940513,0.000020435544,0.92403615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8071985,0.1793013,0.00017213338,0.009747005,0.0005667746,0.000034676235,0.000002534396,0.000017491762,0.002959585],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893576,0.000108103115,0.00031393574,0.00018893094,0.00023497637,0.00021828034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993232,0.000090440866,0.00011253856,0.00011192937,0.00020787663,0.00015403412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052819145,0.00009052342,0.0003013517,0.000018002766,0.00022934421,0.000028053932,0.0001874139,0.000046129222,0.0002853472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006263034,0.00007620837,0.000030354324,0.00032537009,0.0002589776,0.00012456594,0.00007263991,0.000043373973,0.00016666103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016580832,0.000044757224,0.00089309865,0.0012251454,0.00004525989,0.0000015414157,0.0065536983,9.904873e-9,0.000037210644,0.24354367,0.015842311,0.7317967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060634236,0.000042447387,0.000093772935,0.0029294526,0.000020259225,7.574307e-7,0.000054423283,4.9526182e-8,0.000070895454,0.00037315,0.9962562,0.000097970085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07658619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2527291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98041385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036426183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013862034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9295629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619707348","doi":"10.29173/alr488","title":"Principles of Kyoto and Emissions Trading Systems: A Primer for Energy Lawyers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kyoto Protocol; Emissions trading; Greenhouse gas; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Clean Development Mechanism; Business; Climate change; Government (linguistics); Climate change mitigation; International trade; Economics; Natural resource economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06805492274857106,"score_gpt":0.3205381381756745,"score_spread":0.25248321542710345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2619707348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016584899,0.44608122,0.00033691683,0.022516469,0.0003243233,0.00227491,0.000020198542,0.000064181055,0.5267233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97394,0.022160273,0.000078782214,0.0020443453,0.00026844852,0.00011334558,0.0000035461455,0.000014986633,0.0013762441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902487,0.00010316034,0.00035284212,0.00018597803,0.00016209968,0.00017102479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991326,0.00034322467,0.00018055213,0.000085309955,0.000076420314,0.00018191463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003287731,0.00008951447,0.00039735492,0.000007982224,0.00024192593,0.00003315016,0.00014894332,0.00005342646,0.000032507658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006440769,0.00007085215,0.00007938441,0.00018554821,0.00011567313,0.00013878084,0.00002525413,0.000034934088,0.0000021262058],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031578318,0.000009687786,0.00012681811,0.0039192988,0.000025044932,2.9434065e-7,0.001275698,3.7721873e-7,0.00006696081,0.99235106,0.0013217024,0.0008998832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007966944,0.000032708544,0.0000034582135,0.0026662087,0.00006573067,5.9811333e-7,0.00017585809,0.000034922945,0.000050419185,0.00010103333,0.9966977,0.00009169181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07060264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062547238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.995376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014161946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001096996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9355863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621087158","doi":"","title":"Personal Jurisdiction in the Data Age: MacDermid v. Deiter's Adaptation of International Shoe Amidst Supreme Court Uncertainty","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maine law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Personal jurisdiction; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.06082935640126188,"score_gpt":0.3381627950855944,"score_spread":0.2773334386843325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621087158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.094942376,0.21605399,0.0021554932,0.22285116,0.0037366233,0.010477379,0.00052109355,0.0003442997,0.4489176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98750013,0.010039219,0.000064492146,0.0016406896,0.0003741573,0.00005266746,0.0001497966,0.0000057283974,0.00017309113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846846,0.00029504157,0.00035808195,0.00018919252,0.00052989676,0.00015935044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993207,0.000101899015,0.00016372126,0.00021035549,0.00016714045,0.000036176527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016089416,0.00008420253,0.00020663014,0.000024565636,0.00015989844,0.00008494692,0.00063829863,0.000044739045,0.0005552547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018201135,0.00005878348,0.000047052694,0.00026619658,0.00016974298,0.0005306508,0.00006599876,0.000114740746,0.000040434592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003582139,0.00055727264,0.00982916,0.0041694776,0.00015493731,0.00003665363,0.036124382,0.00007640041,0.00014642067,0.69305074,0.112054974,0.14376374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015120866,0.00002167342,0.002810078,0.001086115,0.000029955558,0.000002591762,0.0013197293,0.0007476181,8.3126446e-7,0.0013588266,0.992373,0.00009836359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10130682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048944235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8925578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008003359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000101315534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9684101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624265922","doi":"10.29173/alr675","title":"The Iroquois Pipeline Project: A Study in Federal/State Conflict","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pipeline (software); Authorization; State (computer science); Process (computing); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Business; Public administration; Operations research; Engineering; Sociology; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.04541077352948219,"score_gpt":0.3738125880105131,"score_spread":0.3284018144810309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2624265922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01943367,0.095392935,0.00000418956,0.016852167,0.0007648234,0.005851894,0.0000025252825,0.00007916363,0.86161864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9512255,0.028876398,0.000004119389,0.003573649,0.000509667,0.00019162132,0.0000011379882,0.000016200274,0.015601699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808687,0.0004804171,0.00046303688,0.00025510517,0.00033800758,0.0003765575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895924,0.00038956528,0.0001519203,0.00025972212,0.00017242267,0.00006712096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018616802,0.00012954617,0.00034096066,0.000015647807,0.0010079682,0.00019468361,0.00039308015,0.00003717913,0.00008139192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076316105,0.00007948106,0.000062840845,0.0005783675,0.00034273954,0.00019367585,0.000059175713,0.0001201888,0.00026822646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011311552,0.0013183728,0.04591332,0.0026731945,0.00019969443,0.00005295783,0.14717901,2.3587728e-7,0.00001180322,0.47725677,0.18553165,0.13974988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015951427,0.00008473193,0.00024679516,0.0007721811,0.000013733689,8.212956e-7,0.00062088564,0.0000015007821,0.0000023336856,0.00030302466,0.9976741,0.00012036341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6275209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.882856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93179184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004844519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021676159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7752579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2635633351","doi":"","title":"The Development of Medical Marihuana Law in Canada and its Effect on Michigan Marihuana Statutes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan State international law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01996899898648709,"score_gpt":0.32663443389989427,"score_spread":0.3066654349134072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2635633351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76417404,0.027446704,0.0000046233854,0.021443905,0.0015627176,0.0011160347,0.000094850155,0.000021458876,0.18413566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884021,0.009786713,0.000015333278,0.0013130604,0.00008244915,0.000028369304,0.000009196088,0.000009242367,0.00035349574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976914,0.00018569306,0.0005332571,0.0002105327,0.0011269092,0.00025219988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988471,0.00041170287,0.0003160426,0.00016063306,0.00012717221,0.000137348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020617652,0.00013265795,0.00031177435,0.000018196493,0.0007650859,0.0001570027,0.00084648526,0.000039449424,0.00008725036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005993473,0.00009177659,0.000037622383,0.0000524967,0.00023571546,0.00017572219,0.00014728057,0.00017799033,0.0000063440543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038735998,0.000033759334,0.0034710781,0.0008527048,0.000114341325,0.000041007577,0.0016200901,5.453225e-7,0.000015353562,0.9516483,0.0002856962,0.04187838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035911365,0.000034254346,0.0070064045,0.005114133,0.000014654244,0.0000022196386,0.0001540156,0.00001198416,0.00041930148,0.0021888977,0.9844866,0.0002084556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9158505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9842009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012177471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012802741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58844995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W26477208","doi":"10.1177/0306312715575054","title":"Rosario Esparza, Sr., and Consuelo Esparza, Plaintiffs v. Pierre Foods, n/k/a Advanced Pierre Foods, Inc., Defendant.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Studies of Science","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.036068973080222014,"score_gpt":0.3362157129895857,"score_spread":0.3001467399093637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W26477208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9143098,0.022618754,0.000036680805,0.0069043306,0.0020020516,0.0013514565,0.000041589672,0.00018348519,0.052551843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99571896,0.0022427912,0.00036805312,0.00022269363,0.00051654613,0.000076259144,0.0000012836887,0.000018012683,0.0008353761],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962728,0.00014946994,0.00059010176,0.00068204163,0.0012769644,0.0010286018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974911,0.0003347702,0.00048601208,0.00019905661,0.0011876546,0.00030137243],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018613376,0.00029942565,0.0007165854,0.00016486483,0.006037791,0.00030555765,0.00082580594,0.0001691964,0.0000849691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002072056,0.00027018588,0.00010143469,0.0014099127,0.013465128,0.0013635644,0.0005299638,0.00027049627,0.000042727122],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014149083,0.0004553729,0.04272521,0.00070874125,0.00049554673,0.00001783651,0.41103822,0.00001572298,0.010809257,0.26152724,0.038302183,0.23376316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028605056,0.00084001094,0.081333056,0.0005993922,0.00019843818,0.000007745775,0.580426,0.000044433986,0.0026080892,0.08439282,0.24439363,0.0022958938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013784371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0096507035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23146726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023248172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007619901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999975},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["insufficient_payload"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W264846025","doi":"","title":"Written and Oral Persuasion in the United States Courts: A District Judge's Perspective on Their History, Function, and Future","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Argument (complex analysis); Adversarial system; Persuasion; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.018343817006556705,"score_gpt":0.3047617679055159,"score_spread":0.2864179508989592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W264846025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83131266,0.02204424,0.00003515898,0.13403045,0.00019169267,0.0002885819,0.0000028259285,0.0000113234555,0.012083083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97992915,0.016940266,0.0000049572554,0.0026014661,0.0004726717,6.5389855e-7,6.6489605e-7,0.00000467378,0.000045520213],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998718,0.00049213064,0.000204934,0.00010543592,0.00032378384,0.00015566389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985473,0.0005835798,0.0003667628,0.000059417376,0.00037496263,0.0000679563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025866977,0.00011070969,0.00016629379,0.00008712415,0.00045080474,0.00013702449,0.00014574606,0.00006815801,0.000008551542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027660112,0.000055372406,0.000019197307,0.00028267133,0.00018074423,0.00063191855,0.000010286737,0.00041323696,6.421395e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005119448,0.00045705223,0.0011284155,0.0001046417,0.00014533808,0.00004651144,0.9211416,0.00007029025,0.00006579212,0.023099165,0.01042614,0.038195606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006107968,0.000933697,0.0040273294,0.00008364337,0.00013971164,0.00012193224,0.5415093,0.00004271468,0.0000054657107,0.018377693,0.43402097,0.00012674819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022184183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002224749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42359483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008560594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001327056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3467271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2727564952","doi":"","title":"Canada v. United States of America","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography; History of the United States; Archaeology","score_opus":0.010791714715945488,"score_gpt":0.24134614877763563,"score_spread":0.23055443406169016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2727564952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79423356,0.0027534422,0.002084842,0.1179133,0.0053061177,0.0008937114,0.0036769076,0.00016972458,0.0729684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992918,0.00087933685,0.000046541467,0.004417729,0.00034288858,0.0000031191435,0.000054902037,0.000023312175,0.0013141417],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722314,0.00032896298,0.00055442814,0.0001714114,0.0010458614,0.0006762254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722826,0.00048166324,0.0004708498,0.0001529027,0.0010377716,0.0006285352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043615254,0.00018273748,0.00032632914,0.00016323997,0.0011931784,0.000098904384,0.0004617455,0.00006511531,0.0004764566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033910232,0.00012896434,0.00004925358,0.0011313348,0.00044777847,0.00025473462,0.000034459827,0.00024081566,0.0000019932636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012279501,0.00008058537,0.004589982,0.00010235504,0.00040380482,0.000574878,0.006363136,0.0012553318,0.00023473265,0.03860025,0.93595165,0.011720486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032270537,0.00005058318,0.00013147522,0.00012767782,0.000020305244,0.000011571935,0.010247165,0.000042463354,0.00020439338,0.0012670072,0.98735845,0.00021618513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99995166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19868448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010367763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007891762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2728048982","doi":"","title":"Emerging from the Haze of America's War on Drugs and Examining Canada's New Half-Baked Laws","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham international law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Haze; Political science; Law; Geography; Meteorology","score_opus":0.013802225428663875,"score_gpt":0.2592427467225681,"score_spread":0.2454405212939042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2728048982","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52060896,0.0010810364,0.0005273024,0.067331545,0.003558276,0.00029677685,0.00003751066,0.000031435844,0.40652716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955042,0.00009849679,0.00016777826,0.0012369887,0.0016091098,0.0000032024993,0.0000030313436,0.000008181918,0.0013690076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986545,0.00007960733,0.00028143,0.00011382135,0.000688721,0.00018195447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990648,0.00025137208,0.00027103024,0.000062951134,0.00020933179,0.00014052272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026592164,0.00008477784,0.0001366233,0.000024005136,0.0006032495,0.00016681581,0.00035079155,0.00003525537,0.00072112604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018183108,0.00005958735,0.000036724556,0.0000807405,0.00013370618,0.00030994427,0.000039995793,0.00019548765,0.000008227703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011656997,0.00015393067,0.015326509,0.000018793175,0.0007599294,0.00004537398,0.06676261,0.0003913981,0.00075528416,0.4555367,0.23799236,0.22214055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032636122,0.000046545145,0.0045661214,0.00013321017,0.000012452782,0.0000058258624,0.01669314,0.00012659341,0.000109284454,0.013646022,0.96420914,0.00012528493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9800735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79700243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7262168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011385422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035721174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78958243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734877033","doi":"","title":"Lawrence Solomon: If Voters Want to Rip Up Ontario’s Outrageous Renewable Energy Contracts, the Courts Won’t Stop Them","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Renewable energy; Law; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.02579643519589863,"score_gpt":0.2565628021366177,"score_spread":0.23076636694071906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734877033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076022156,0.00027961633,0.008393984,0.05664022,0.0034775834,0.0007267822,0.00002010237,0.00037413978,0.8540654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8325254,0.000060066304,0.00004118106,0.0017475559,0.000413984,0.000031043997,5.651207e-7,0.000011622657,0.16516858],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980068,0.00014191873,0.00028899105,0.00035188472,0.0005729356,0.0006374443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988526,0.00029229646,0.00012118366,0.0002930842,0.00017355912,0.0002672711],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078774197,0.00017444922,0.00025498477,0.000027185872,0.00080401666,0.00022087854,0.0005879902,0.00013005441,0.0011575313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020081687,0.00008847599,0.00007964174,0.00016091342,0.00024900018,0.00033331572,0.00007592539,0.00009182627,0.00016573217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035754844,0.0003284013,0.011070566,0.000029379606,0.00024157258,0.00014046502,0.17057852,0.00020009633,0.0052229636,0.30741867,0.42149368,0.0829181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028186006,0.0000704738,0.00060332456,0.000061556755,0.000016221647,0.0000037053758,0.00440768,0.0000027294961,0.0017450891,0.009661412,0.98288,0.00026594693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89607227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9006013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7565032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031271216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006795593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742639630","doi":"10.5204/qutlr.v16i1.613","title":"Permitting Voluntary Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide: Law Reform Pathways for Common Law Jurisdictions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Law reform; Law; Political science; Discretion; Jury; Legislation; Nullification; Reform Act; Assisted suicide","score_opus":0.09939074364770284,"score_gpt":0.36755375413076546,"score_spread":0.2681630104830626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742639630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031139164,0.11581328,0.00008207805,0.015956031,0.00060262217,0.0018890538,0.00014923046,0.00029611733,0.8620977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979267,0.014380599,0.0001194325,0.0047664014,0.00059766934,0.00015367045,0.00001232683,0.000025088997,0.00067782187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984055,0.0001741869,0.00046868692,0.00029740113,0.00027387158,0.00038034676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989993,0.00021863976,0.00020906352,0.00022283988,0.0001701202,0.00018002535],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012751798,0.00015888328,0.00047171407,0.000014905683,0.0014453452,0.000090132584,0.00021069404,0.000113729504,0.0000721664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000086325075,0.00010457369,0.00014245172,0.00018588976,0.00045366565,0.0005060653,0.000052322044,0.000093859744,0.00003674467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033783729,0.000021645636,0.0001649507,0.00090607547,0.000018713426,0.0000022674183,0.0004011546,4.1328065e-9,0.000050976945,0.9765923,0.0005861682,0.021252366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019442149,0.000058199716,0.000173254,0.0042411834,0.00009078576,0.000005719669,0.0001287011,5.98525e-7,0.000042018015,0.0083762,0.98649824,0.00019065682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11000065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18121874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9859121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017304579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009299287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743881733","doi":"","title":"Humiliated by Strip Search, Toronto Man Wants Watchdog’s Ruling Quashed","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.019624094727621905,"score_gpt":0.31264585640412307,"score_spread":0.2930217616765012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2743881733","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44720364,0.0012815163,0.0012139,0.008078565,0.00079685025,0.00053420645,0.000032868506,0.00044394506,0.5404145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9521562,0.00024160584,0.00003986136,0.00019537975,0.0003909583,0.000008120839,0.0000022567208,0.000012449618,0.046953164],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827456,0.00014732026,0.00024248341,0.00027178036,0.00054540584,0.0005184659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993148,0.00010495708,0.000053443422,0.00014489022,0.00015065134,0.00023125474],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073553977,0.00011367014,0.00018330051,0.000015882248,0.00053305476,0.00010606632,0.00030500075,0.00012500024,0.0025651483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018042866,0.000070947644,0.000052797448,0.00013341039,0.00014805581,0.00063849025,0.000043119187,0.000052875403,0.00031627988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019505442,0.0005673116,0.0367333,0.00014536733,0.00022096619,0.000030095845,0.058848593,0.0000016346095,0.10748697,0.08343614,0.5570112,0.15532339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016000033,0.00018945297,0.0021694286,0.00022759919,0.000023007386,7.226222e-7,0.031207364,0.000019195255,0.0151642235,0.0029517421,0.94564563,0.00080161565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32769835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.114597775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5049526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002743806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019025846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W274710323","doi":"","title":"Supreme Court Preview. (Looking at the Law)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutionality; Conviction; Supreme court; Life imprisonment; Prison; Political science; Punishment (psychology); Equal Protection Clause; Criminal law; Common law; Psychology","score_opus":0.041159620802117505,"score_gpt":0.30070436431906705,"score_spread":0.25954474351694956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W274710323","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057924995,0.0046039294,0.000019282197,0.013804251,0.00025367225,0.0002159577,8.1117105e-7,0.00007747623,0.9752321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9248426,0.0005640629,0.000011110733,0.0017624992,0.00042763553,0.000010544069,2.385363e-7,0.000005153552,0.07237616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990983,0.00010510844,0.00013581311,0.000120439705,0.0003173095,0.00022302521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996214,0.00009304059,0.000048320657,0.00012279354,0.00005484544,0.000059631242],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005579948,0.000058412556,0.000099907746,0.000006632993,0.0010678495,0.00010293309,0.00021755949,0.000044730616,0.0063787205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009244912,0.00003447252,0.000049716527,0.000144832,0.00019846088,0.00016856185,0.000045714667,0.00006009177,0.0009167236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018509589,0.0000382001,0.0025369949,0.00003280593,0.000019438437,0.000003353212,0.01671893,0.0000022451645,0.000066570865,0.6731098,0.29759234,0.009877446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004242727,0.0000071433433,0.000056417186,0.000019387508,0.000006589833,6.655241e-7,0.00078853685,0.000012194954,0.00006663459,0.0011086498,0.99782705,0.00006430816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021283725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045491535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9190501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005451023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015700216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756562363","doi":"","title":"Alberta Law Reform Institute","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.013343710348467073,"score_gpt":0.2379567838292309,"score_spread":0.22461307348076384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756562363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011755483,0.00046378272,0.0000029724372,0.0087408405,0.0010523698,0.00021608936,0.000057670546,0.000037589674,0.9776732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810366,0.0053957305,0.000061677165,0.0004041944,0.00063379784,0.00002026472,0.000003988704,0.000015446903,0.0124282865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985478,0.000049986975,0.0003065733,0.00022974373,0.000320365,0.0005455239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988533,0.00006580849,0.00011941904,0.00023525918,0.00015612997,0.0005700366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002945352,0.0001395393,0.00023163961,0.00084549905,0.00050747645,0.00004034368,0.000400019,0.00017540494,0.00021983654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014688815,0.00009947047,0.00012784386,0.0019597912,0.0013648466,0.0006270046,0.000021641983,0.00005708075,0.00006009301],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062265713,0.000011682462,0.0075055556,0.000018081073,0.00002900979,0.00000640076,0.0018602783,3.5733844e-8,0.000030237014,0.97281814,0.012578397,0.005135981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014837632,0.000031237083,0.0017986749,0.00007056687,0.000013142851,6.299526e-7,0.0004855197,1.8647096e-8,0.00003801031,0.0042321496,0.99300015,0.00018152484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99954355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9804217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013920397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068023853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50288343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757365176","doi":"","title":"New Brunswick. Supreme Court","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | United Kingdom Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02768971995276146,"score_gpt":0.2831824010391151,"score_spread":0.2554926810863536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2757365176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12282392,0.001105252,0.0011964682,0.007100768,0.0022639884,0.00066366175,0.0000422006,0.0005133589,0.8642904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897208,0.0035850413,0.00042681806,0.00024543263,0.0011298609,0.0000051922625,0.0000067391907,0.000028338363,0.004851765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979452,0.00015619812,0.00045596343,0.0003017298,0.0006304514,0.00051045493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985205,0.00032215184,0.0002594384,0.00028207566,0.00031804555,0.00029781452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042241396,0.00020307797,0.0003235144,0.0006406145,0.00044282412,0.00006184517,0.0005119894,0.00021978443,0.00028942834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026190918,0.00014529732,0.0001895513,0.002369847,0.0009888456,0.00046609895,0.000065799315,0.00009689419,0.000036829715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037978152,0.000057572575,0.026853671,0.00002927542,0.00006383343,0.0000051424977,0.0019222583,2.429975e-7,0.00051594956,0.9426691,0.024062252,0.0037827583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046884042,0.00008274481,0.0018613439,0.00017563823,0.00003746451,7.7073673e-7,0.00035482238,1.1085718e-7,0.00043546373,0.008935869,0.9873952,0.0002516933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2788776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07167775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.963333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003066787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044971053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9452617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759122353","doi":"","title":"Prince George's County - Board Of Education - Issuance Of Credit Cards - Prohibition Pg 411-15 (HB 707)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maryland | Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Business; Political science; History","score_opus":0.0183376068246481,"score_gpt":0.29664823918850985,"score_spread":0.2783106323638618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759122353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28856868,0.0011961985,0.000037209138,0.0004984078,0.001243543,0.00044521273,0.00007114928,0.000029990293,0.70790964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938424,0.00047533124,0.00018239283,0.000063316795,0.0009278202,0.000026331552,0.000022680644,0.000011927101,0.0044477936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982342,0.000116988434,0.00048425823,0.00020597757,0.000741345,0.0002172196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984586,0.000070258044,0.00044123942,0.00019799864,0.00069620105,0.0001356543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007700138,0.00011945435,0.00036748798,0.000052400028,0.00010851767,0.00001890815,0.00023867874,0.0001371434,0.000051830735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002928149,0.00010827901,0.000056105724,0.0002843941,0.0003870539,0.000419194,0.000044547167,0.000092063,0.000005907961],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064042903,0.002051335,0.1992789,0.0035563596,0.00017309922,0.000009955609,0.067239664,0.00007013395,0.0025671457,0.5267513,0.18067722,0.016984498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003645505,0.00018665889,0.0033871043,0.00023856063,0.000042463675,9.539689e-7,0.001678647,0.0000039182314,0.0012672513,0.0082396595,0.9844028,0.00018745202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08604936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009032287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80372554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007336041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011316157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92003673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759507286","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Deradicalization of the Wagner Act Model:The Impact of B.C. Health Services and Fraser","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.018895149944001318,"score_gpt":0.2939634375256757,"score_spread":0.2750682875816744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759507286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6788979,0.0040129595,0.0006071039,0.00056699687,0.0003019982,0.0006959425,0.000100499805,0.000021137967,0.31479546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99755114,0.0006983716,0.000033863667,0.0000104452365,0.0000253406,1.709522e-7,0.00002960529,0.0000031792997,0.0016478704],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991659,0.00016296166,0.00012665472,0.00011846162,0.00031059963,0.000115403534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893355,0.00003788169,0.000618673,0.00011864001,0.00024063492,0.000050629176],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036108974,0.00008903184,0.00026277252,0.000014579333,0.00050504593,0.000007838927,0.00029399243,0.00015227334,0.0010712423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020272513,0.0000652998,0.00011764674,0.00007707574,0.00056478014,0.0002847418,0.000028381475,0.000069258385,4.354634e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043901592,0.000311301,0.030894866,0.0023268368,0.00056090625,8.5718256e-7,0.7064348,0.00064382126,0.0002532352,0.23377079,0.0013059907,0.023057606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010675514,0.00026410585,0.7192044,0.0016784659,0.00032631838,5.904991e-7,0.26842374,0.0017235939,0.00007896404,0.0030398378,0.0037242004,0.00046819274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8624291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63451076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6883096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012640729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000989623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762010100","doi":"","title":"Digest of British Columbia case law : being the cases determined in the courts of British Columbia and on appeal therefrom [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.01180223798376326,"score_gpt":0.22266555461002524,"score_spread":0.21086331662626198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762010100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7907061,0.00027227367,1.12041405e-7,0.00024704423,0.0001063754,0.00042208759,0.00056992116,0.0000068022014,0.20766926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99425524,0.0003841653,0.000004982662,0.00021239967,0.0001723309,0.000026111293,0.0000017443168,0.000014860468,0.004928151],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998371,0.00025030575,0.000433896,0.00021944537,0.00035613618,0.0003692306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861276,0.00064784277,0.00022379338,0.00020813609,0.00012146886,0.00018602234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007468427,0.00007759604,0.00031731234,0.000040093877,0.00037714053,0.00020162236,0.00032202536,0.000115227354,0.00006779575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026100426,0.000089372865,0.000059322407,0.00020635921,0.00084110856,0.00016672979,0.000025473144,0.000098242155,6.604733e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042514945,0.00030651625,0.618701,0.0004977154,0.00015789091,0.012013661,0.02966123,0.0000013494192,0.00014715886,0.020519665,0.081598304,0.23635301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013455461,0.00047623942,0.26475328,0.0020017324,0.00010403009,0.00093411293,0.011975819,9.814489e-7,0.000011468226,0.0074746516,0.7103326,0.00058955105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9997372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6287343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000671199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055464194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36445197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762170593","doi":"","title":"Kazemi Estate v. Islamic Republic of Iran and the Doctrine of State Immunity under Canadian Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Estate; Islam; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Sharia; Islamic republic; Philosophy; Mathematics; Theology","score_opus":0.04242137595012278,"score_gpt":0.2757057562862098,"score_spread":0.233284380336087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762170593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7178289,0.00025902022,0.00034019668,0.00086541707,0.00011887986,0.00027116656,0.000113621296,0.000026940772,0.28017583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961605,0.000106476895,0.00039785105,0.00006419827,0.000030372548,2.9981152e-7,0.0000034140614,0.000009058372,0.0032278053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972129,0.0018038881,0.00021046736,0.00017651473,0.0003188288,0.00027743785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986546,0.00022600894,0.00023059266,0.00026226864,0.0003997294,0.00022677048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050585945,0.00010817388,0.00029570676,0.00018725643,0.00064845907,0.00007849317,0.000464229,0.00008767131,0.000030141531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064443983,0.00008859301,0.00007363195,0.0008267831,0.0011710656,0.00041521687,0.00008820032,0.00031633113,0.000005995852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030077167,0.00004253787,0.0046097287,0.000059620354,0.00013858495,0.000017601717,0.10609642,0.00003885515,0.00032538385,0.88358766,0.000051476807,0.004731387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053917975,0.00014426066,0.0020955063,0.00011295527,0.00023532244,0.0000039284414,0.38045752,0.000025719935,0.00080171216,0.090776384,0.51938033,0.00057457737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93032664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7758437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7928113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016743211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007549597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49874884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762313541","doi":"","title":"British Columbia. Supreme Court","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.015201715039385172,"score_gpt":0.2465966546578671,"score_spread":0.23139493961848193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762313541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15333961,0.00094362133,8.332615e-7,0.0022870088,0.001224759,0.0003132111,0.00014176457,0.000045547105,0.84170365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97609794,0.008898235,0.0000769602,0.000151328,0.00079078064,0.00002002757,0.000007368448,0.000018234983,0.013939124],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841833,0.00006113168,0.0002881287,0.00025448223,0.00040582777,0.00057207455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998462,0.00004090953,0.00023889268,0.00039311562,0.0002573193,0.0006077659],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004737627,0.00009749265,0.0002767653,0.00036315038,0.0019818863,0.0009303885,0.00081053574,0.00019148673,0.0011216524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046155072,0.00015372122,0.00014627245,0.00073238066,0.0013548987,0.0004941835,0.000037550606,0.00010579549,0.000015593894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024852384,0.000022724245,0.5367268,0.000040036928,0.00004330843,0.000045895245,0.0013255443,9.554268e-8,0.0000053402828,0.007506001,0.44514456,0.009137215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012066749,0.000022450566,0.17456448,0.000057137782,0.00001625883,0.0000012974613,0.0007164488,1.4933656e-7,0.0000014221421,0.0016769625,0.8226537,0.00016900775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9991906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99994224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8277645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045418376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084195647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765267238","doi":"","title":"Rewriting Hockey's Unwritten Rules: Moore v. Bertuzzi","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maine law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rewriting; Law and economics; Programming language; Law; Computer science; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.040414497346018305,"score_gpt":0.35957113208346725,"score_spread":0.31915663473744893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765267238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015316725,0.08444555,0.000017124448,0.031881683,0.00029961142,0.0005987275,0.0000111844265,0.00012105492,0.8810934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93255514,0.053832155,0.0002047621,0.0059241313,0.0020969626,0.000062931,0.000008854406,0.000028258151,0.0052867974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844253,0.00015825545,0.00034689475,0.00026567685,0.00038930224,0.0003973473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987948,0.00006582994,0.00031661888,0.0005031231,0.00015946702,0.00016015713],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015387434,0.0001380905,0.0004328814,0.000012502602,0.0025167228,0.00037329222,0.0007273312,0.00008364126,0.00033307256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011216832,0.00011601331,0.00013326098,0.000090161455,0.00035945984,0.00047584652,0.000127664,0.00014854167,0.00036934248],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018281373,0.00002517026,0.0007603373,0.0022926326,0.000019437228,0.00002817941,0.00053475046,4.3961357e-8,0.000006183902,0.944157,0.017950289,0.034224156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098387645,0.000012910849,0.00028446078,0.004836328,0.000036089506,0.000002417816,0.00016389143,7.6948487e-7,0.0000048931092,0.005574704,0.988814,0.00017115829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045086477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011409077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9708637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057749814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000114144736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99878186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765704983","doi":"","title":"Toronto Legal Clinic Launches Challenge to Mandatory Minimum Sentence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sentence; Political science; Business; Law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05265288418667979,"score_gpt":0.3705902467685467,"score_spread":0.3179373625818669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765704983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03576083,0.0005206914,0.00004360315,0.009712436,0.0012439605,0.00024479418,0.000003372477,0.00009444093,0.9523759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9356888,0.0002798634,0.00007607126,0.00044840318,0.0013284372,0.000016887258,3.8433583e-7,0.000008614806,0.062152557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870723,0.000058439153,0.00020712567,0.00028997028,0.00038147546,0.0003557663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990525,0.000056025598,0.00011696356,0.0003899674,0.0001247766,0.00025976216],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000764236,0.00010321698,0.00019075186,0.000013189542,0.0014616402,0.0004228124,0.00067855674,0.000102055965,0.0015186409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048919546,0.00008877768,0.00006609644,0.000027185535,0.00022053467,0.0010088609,0.00013464566,0.00006841655,0.0007595772],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018691976,0.0006138959,0.023203919,0.00020960429,0.00015138058,0.00012046306,0.06774157,6.6774913e-7,0.00061600236,0.50546557,0.32987815,0.07181182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015110674,0.00008177913,0.003773008,0.00004136783,0.0000070112224,3.255886e-7,0.009654234,0.0000015629092,0.00006214948,0.0007414511,0.98529685,0.00018914742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21702696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.382223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.899928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011016513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022821694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766300202","doi":"","title":"Canadian Human Rights Act","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.01826609359649322,"score_gpt":0.29103637540426164,"score_spread":0.2727702818077684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766300202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06789552,0.00008707481,2.8468295e-7,0.0040439153,0.00078297476,0.00019959499,0.00004502041,0.00001726207,0.92692834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755649,0.00005242978,0.000026325224,0.00012422517,0.0010250387,0.00000866818,0.0000054128827,0.000012058313,0.023180956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985624,0.00005889421,0.00022476965,0.0002060638,0.00029053283,0.0006573398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978198,0.000026041262,0.000165945,0.00042363966,0.00014703869,0.0014175776],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043493943,0.00011773134,0.00021947903,0.00041247247,0.005372407,0.00020903374,0.00084475277,0.00017211899,0.0009784512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022737726,0.00011907602,0.00006673004,0.00020106926,0.00033993126,0.00045532422,0.00001695567,0.00013123198,0.000120714794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026254747,0.00001584156,0.06975306,0.000030485468,0.00004098116,0.00014481894,0.009388356,9.70675e-7,0.000010605176,0.8073262,0.108577296,0.0047087753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008935959,0.000014455276,0.021275785,0.000028110017,0.000009107329,4.3615375e-7,0.00015423038,2.3837978e-7,0.0000167566,0.005222539,0.97302896,0.00016003044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90766937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039444942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029203426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767731553","doi":"","title":"User “Safer Harbor” from Statutory Damages: Remixing the DOC’s IP Task Force White Paper","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital USD (University of San Diego)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"SAFER; Task force; Statutory law; Damages; White (mutation); Safe harbor; Task (project management); Law; Computer security; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Public administration","score_opus":0.015331725566986192,"score_gpt":0.23025723253541783,"score_spread":0.21492550696843163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767731553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53875476,0.0002961359,0.00030996287,0.0019176384,0.000380656,0.00023476771,0.00019374728,0.000076518576,0.45783582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98479605,0.000057184097,0.000036033045,0.000115996394,0.00023722705,2.6291946e-7,0.000012824055,0.000011143542,0.014733265],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988123,0.000051010844,0.00012251087,0.00027211916,0.0004301947,0.00031185552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988682,0.00011399742,0.00027060095,0.00045614011,0.00015748692,0.00013353798],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023917883,0.00012764959,0.00022416301,0.000038677113,0.002130786,0.0005245647,0.0010235861,0.00011218398,0.00048016422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018098924,0.000117933974,0.0001297644,0.00010112236,0.00088670326,0.003405785,0.00028265722,0.00015844965,0.000080259386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005846098,0.0004990457,0.3461145,0.000275217,0.0009212432,0.00032150952,0.29555434,0.00003882595,0.0027782458,0.1354459,0.15892942,0.05853716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046120866,0.000035998317,0.19987871,0.0001347841,0.000055400516,2.313267e-7,0.048440795,0.000011134415,0.000016811768,0.0033641646,0.74730176,0.0002990119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031992093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019518852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58837235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007308821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016110299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767915429","doi":"10.54648/joia2017040","title":"<i>Eli Lilly v. Canada</i>: A Patently Clear-Cut Dismissal on the Facts, but Opening the Door for Future Claimants on the Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Arbitration","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Plaintiff; Arbitration; Settlor; Political science; Expropriation; Waiver; Economic Justice; Intellectual property; High Court; Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.033305713577065965,"score_gpt":0.3020814067210422,"score_spread":0.26877569314397626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767915429","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4001582,0.00009163874,0.0001349202,0.46979383,0.0045941565,0.00058536656,0.00004517567,0.000008308845,0.12458842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987917,0.00005499603,0.000013008329,0.0062502287,0.005032101,0.00001271433,0.0000018991699,0.000008407181,0.00070966815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982901,0.0001609585,0.00033136155,0.000101439844,0.00095781527,0.0001583184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979372,0.0005538961,0.0007756066,0.00014506829,0.0005321986,0.0000560357],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016715189,0.00009782929,0.0001169365,0.00001857931,0.0029483046,0.00084281596,0.0009925211,0.00005427282,0.00006541736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009959462,0.000043408432,0.000105829175,0.000035495206,0.00013963864,0.00044840993,0.000029098228,0.00038151615,0.000005251741],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042921185,0.000052234744,0.0005563196,0.000006776622,0.00015082261,0.000013668399,0.0044635152,0.000092335,0.00039970368,0.9583082,0.033867687,0.0016595022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070125196,0.0003816406,0.012536922,0.0003494073,0.000048109272,0.000021559563,0.016978085,0.00043309527,0.00291492,0.016748099,0.9486555,0.00023141797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16621341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42152166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94156015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015855815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054256053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768602159","doi":"","title":"Canada and United States: Campus Sexual Assault Law & Policy Comparative Analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Criminology; Political science; Law; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Sociology; Medical emergency; Medicine","score_opus":0.024927929898942842,"score_gpt":0.314884714665855,"score_spread":0.28995678476691217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768602159","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93731356,0.00054593297,0.00010406525,0.017293796,0.0007736921,0.00032397866,0.0014435386,0.00004664983,0.042154808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930673,0.00019016676,0.00002811553,0.0047372086,0.00057769247,0.000004320489,0.00023236491,0.00001569468,0.0011471268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668604,0.00044551503,0.00052649167,0.00029844823,0.0012127612,0.00083074934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996407,0.00030020822,0.000722242,0.00030827324,0.0012320065,0.0010303232],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079286285,0.00028177424,0.00057374453,0.0003023771,0.008439341,0.0013584542,0.00068222615,0.00012214498,0.0000894054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028545372,0.00025184083,0.000056228986,0.0011997861,0.00086799037,0.00055795856,0.00007962511,0.0006314767,9.821783e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025946696,0.00018837846,0.062331434,0.00018266989,0.0076195085,0.0025025087,0.06675987,0.022520516,0.000032271837,0.5468757,0.28893268,0.0017949945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048383043,0.00005533315,0.0028904125,0.000036040812,0.00024657,0.0000201272,0.036588263,0.0009447236,0.00001807055,0.0014281715,0.9568767,0.00041178186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.667944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012998445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007672162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773753753","doi":"","title":"British Columbia. Court of Appeal","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.013341180375732134,"score_gpt":0.2464097517477036,"score_spread":0.23306857137197146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773753753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22872126,0.0009560689,9.4689534e-7,0.0011057267,0.00081727083,0.00027289416,0.00017576205,0.000022174818,0.7679279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877883,0.006680818,0.0000738252,0.00005798798,0.000438215,0.000010930839,0.000005106009,0.000012868111,0.004931937],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986227,0.000053266016,0.0003283199,0.00019529012,0.0003776864,0.00042272516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860185,0.000038315746,0.0003467388,0.00032477704,0.0002691672,0.0004191424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004436789,0.00008111371,0.00030601834,0.0003505338,0.0009915384,0.00031173267,0.00068117224,0.00016502243,0.0004982433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034532204,0.00012464939,0.00014401521,0.0007110702,0.001568506,0.00032135085,0.00003257272,0.00008167986,0.0000043348823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046509817,0.0000378672,0.7207531,0.00010459281,0.00006392938,0.000028864599,0.0019066103,1.7850924e-7,0.000013290589,0.011237252,0.25245452,0.01339516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012993439,0.00003221882,0.18399075,0.00008294577,0.000017993132,8.710481e-7,0.00089245354,1.4904373e-7,0.0000038464063,0.001371213,0.813347,0.00013063425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9988052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99984825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76299596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027395528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007920402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7626212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773895286","doi":"10.29173/alr1244","title":"Recent Judicial Decisions of Interest to Energy Lawyers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists; Calgary Laboratory Services","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Duty; Insolvency; Law; Judicial opinion; Legislation; Political science; Corporate governance; Common law; Judicial interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Law and economics; Economics; Business; Supreme court","score_opus":0.12436475873453809,"score_gpt":0.3854942446628735,"score_spread":0.2611294859283354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773895286","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015942142,0.039545417,0.000032252345,0.0334932,0.0010312193,0.00043873297,0.000005514369,0.000017334753,0.92384213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8709645,0.122653134,0.000035355373,0.0043110745,0.00037817602,0.000028340077,0.0000019676197,0.000011355831,0.0016160554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884003,0.000119106044,0.00037440372,0.00020671611,0.00022062733,0.000239083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857765,0.0002669173,0.00027393177,0.00046973588,0.00020864708,0.00020308762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005737645,0.000099749326,0.00040175047,0.000018206316,0.0008014463,0.00009125086,0.0007266741,0.00006291646,0.00043401204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003522813,0.00008222361,0.00010496697,0.00014856068,0.00024713064,0.00022491056,0.0001371328,0.00005787508,0.00013744528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004507651,0.000026637916,0.000092986345,0.0000878731,0.000014788475,0.0000014473504,0.00033038427,6.6018764e-8,0.00000958771,0.8677492,0.016569478,0.11511306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056129298,0.000029058476,0.00005999954,0.003212285,0.000031002368,4.4351637e-7,0.00003257168,1.2576399e-7,0.0000489447,0.002649371,0.993777,0.000103069025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37237784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66611266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97720754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003743658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014503098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63180155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774697679","doi":"10.29173/alr1247","title":"The Oil and Gas ROFR: Understanding Current ROFR Issues from the Point of View of the Transactional Lawyer, the Litigator, and In-House Counsel","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Interpretation (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Duty; Insolvency; Law; Point (geometry); Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Business; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.048880586736071305,"score_gpt":0.3296881836334959,"score_spread":0.28080759689742457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774697679","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013258169,0.8575035,0.000005396393,0.1145811,0.0004893998,0.00047527335,0.000015373882,0.000007612738,0.0136642195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56959593,0.42982456,0.0000010658181,0.00034942914,0.00008170839,0.000013747289,2.3234342e-7,0.000006028183,0.00012728747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858254,0.0004057509,0.00034632182,0.00015085646,0.00035078582,0.00016375344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977283,0.0014575521,0.00033714427,0.000370166,0.00006544116,0.000041407166],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015061608,0.00010716618,0.00029766202,0.000003582115,0.0015950047,0.0001540623,0.0005299741,0.00003950366,0.000022608097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047875475,0.000043521264,0.00008842089,0.00009109462,0.0013293823,0.00019741646,0.00004884058,0.00015590205,0.0000021930553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015106822,0.000042399053,0.0034232363,0.0011456882,0.000078897356,3.6286013e-7,0.011707198,3.1659687e-7,0.000010998334,0.9337615,0.0019805438,0.047833797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013978005,0.000009337542,0.0009145293,0.005952162,0.00009085619,0.000001146211,0.000904216,0.000003194003,0.0000179787,0.020720355,0.9711651,0.000081322316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15810424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3016685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9691846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029942927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001097774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775084867","doi":"","title":"Canadian Bill of Rights","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bill of rights; Political science; Law; Business; Human rights","score_opus":0.01586531310931771,"score_gpt":0.2709500391023645,"score_spread":0.25508472599304677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775084867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04721918,0.0001935079,5.4438186e-7,0.0047460883,0.000784526,0.00018083672,0.000086288775,0.000008014894,0.94678104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907839,0.00019511567,0.000052794137,0.00008826037,0.00047435897,0.0000049903347,0.0000025899099,0.00000843159,0.008389582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881065,0.00004846025,0.00025103454,0.00015429199,0.00027051638,0.00046504522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982339,0.00003688467,0.00021640406,0.00035977343,0.0002070231,0.000946024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040691587,0.00009069364,0.00023447152,0.00040530262,0.0011606234,0.00006156409,0.00066635536,0.00014252929,0.0005226912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041411578,0.00007680099,0.0000624248,0.00023562243,0.00037977006,0.0003096606,0.000014093001,0.000083720544,0.000039736777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009741063,0.000034303506,0.11837309,0.00007975653,0.00008301021,0.000117118434,0.024331208,0.000004373108,0.000028216355,0.6769699,0.16846831,0.011500963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008231282,0.00001602476,0.01095019,0.00003748819,0.000009408346,3.086782e-7,0.0002787747,5.483655e-7,0.00004891868,0.0095552,0.9789073,0.000113535185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9435647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020864647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047740107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89266944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780014199","doi":"","title":"A State in Shackles: The Effect of a Dysfunctional Childhood on Crime and Imprisonment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South Dakota law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Imprisonment; Population; China; State (computer science); Demography; Per capita; Law; Geography; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.01738619952999428,"score_gpt":0.3111859570448523,"score_spread":0.29379975751485804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780014199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5177535,0.17123969,0.000011846806,0.007514789,0.0008925178,0.0053919777,0.00010107301,0.00006356943,0.29703107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99434227,0.0049579563,0.0000021874725,0.00040667452,0.00010064512,0.000045118453,8.248257e-7,0.0000057144007,0.00013860542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889326,0.00024550044,0.00022738455,0.00017004975,0.00029755975,0.00016625471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931085,0.000116492105,0.00023256388,0.00026337412,0.000024393068,0.00005229834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016366431,0.00009440168,0.00030615734,0.000010798328,0.000547187,0.0000857542,0.00026033405,0.00003231051,0.00007236795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043570396,0.00005403966,0.00006280544,0.000059058355,0.00030369422,0.00011714244,0.00006306256,0.00011128055,0.00004438037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029067314,0.00041852772,0.16195288,0.01977286,0.00037481348,0.000032453816,0.06304997,0.000004566198,0.000048077156,0.5837184,0.0053743073,0.16496243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032435115,0.0015215223,0.21074864,0.031324245,0.00035771576,0.0000046836517,0.00070254056,0.000005355432,0.00020257632,0.009284082,0.7417555,0.0008496504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010225739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001301867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7363812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024227595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005411488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99636525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782373394","doi":"","title":"Recognition of Canadian same-sex marriage: \"Zappone and Gilligan v. Revenue Commissioners and Others\"","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Research Repository (Kingston University London)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Gender studies; Psychoanalysis; Sociology","score_opus":0.05109892314624952,"score_gpt":0.28226182189928173,"score_spread":0.2311628987530322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782373394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034919754,0.0007130616,0.0000015955878,0.00096469896,0.00023903462,0.00054519705,0.000106388834,0.000030331501,0.96247995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25839254,0.002993462,0.000089269444,0.00003442661,0.00045952096,0.0000010256655,0.00001727328,0.000039275223,0.7379732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997975,0.00027018593,0.0002025708,0.00042588828,0.0007156407,0.0004107234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816245,0.00022225604,0.00021559218,0.00023340162,0.0005308245,0.00063549954],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001436177,0.00017698025,0.0003577406,0.001015045,0.0019013103,0.000115865885,0.00030869563,0.0006527251,0.000077402474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018933362,0.00020520756,0.00006739704,0.00024136146,0.0016036759,0.00024926304,0.00012651009,0.0009866579,0.000010282679],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001201971,0.00021614808,0.007899576,0.0040043592,0.0011413905,0.004533728,0.10445491,0.0000010644069,0.056766238,0.6615354,0.03863813,0.11960709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023415606,0.00008128213,0.00018788784,0.00055664475,0.000038362145,0.0000122896845,0.0022369907,8.220599e-7,0.00076639926,0.0031054385,0.99253386,0.00024585682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7079221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4140959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95389575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003558866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012301784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99939805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784058903","doi":"","title":"Reigniting the Dialogue: The Latest Use of the Notwithstanding Clause in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0699901260664429,"score_gpt":0.26192259895362685,"score_spread":0.19193247288718396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784058903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62439543,0.00014975353,0.000010064678,0.055859998,0.0014132727,0.0005883659,0.000021039288,0.000029179551,0.3175329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978826,0.000008396499,0.0000028087866,0.0013869246,0.00049498293,0.00000853089,3.7827357e-7,0.000005838214,0.00020956091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987313,0.00028714037,0.00019726196,0.00010275675,0.00039166142,0.00028987246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988503,0.0006032976,0.00014081862,0.00020225419,0.00016179844,0.000041545733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011123834,0.00005933968,0.00009478081,0.000011391119,0.001112733,0.00023086103,0.00049639854,0.00003511479,0.000040853683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012643868,0.000026221862,0.000026186404,0.00061170175,0.0006174348,0.00031587004,0.000090621004,0.00014507017,0.0000026906039],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042513834,0.000012103794,0.08387392,0.000009623474,0.00001486538,0.0000014588201,0.014099143,0.000005073894,0.000027417818,0.8961403,0.0051781447,0.0006337189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015788268,0.000013257175,0.016793784,0.00007955439,0.0000116913225,0.000001158303,0.011080538,0.0000591845,0.00019336255,0.008572401,0.96289945,0.00013774697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9937542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9577213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021079337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013043033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8558355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784118047","doi":"","title":"The Constitutionality of Restrictions on Recreational Cannabis Advertising: Balancing Public Health and Freedom of Expression","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Advertising; Recreation; Cannabis; Freedom of expression; Public health; First amendment; Political science; Internet privacy; Law; Business; Medicine; Computer science; Psychiatry; Constitution; Human rights","score_opus":0.1462983577840852,"score_gpt":0.3725945129491481,"score_spread":0.22629615516506288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784118047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912834,0.00022668432,0.00018249023,0.0040197647,0.00027981686,0.00021028283,0.000033018183,0.000024276573,0.0037402571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983171,0.0002782554,0.000014649357,0.000046925303,0.000097189746,8.099571e-7,0.0000038038183,0.000005011309,0.001236251],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845785,0.00036480927,0.000244326,0.00021827193,0.00047045533,0.00024428137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835765,0.000184292,0.00057839387,0.00031513025,0.00033520203,0.0002293267],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010567788,0.00009735395,0.0002007997,0.00011886832,0.003212195,0.0002415962,0.0005034371,0.00009722986,0.0000045594065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009117321,0.00008554976,0.000054533295,0.0001688599,0.0010000869,0.0011524227,0.00014171253,0.00018841187,0.0000020292382],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038577815,0.000040134815,0.97050095,0.000031762298,0.000017677925,0.0000026780222,0.0012101639,0.0000040205473,0.00010753372,0.027459674,0.0000068138615,0.0005800279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037270464,0.00007995844,0.97148895,0.0003885236,0.000009534313,0.00000142912,0.0018570534,1.4464078e-7,0.00020494868,0.0004716399,0.025025122,0.000099989746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022621274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02670082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026988033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017841587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001067345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784904327","doi":"","title":"The Needs of the Many Outweigh the Needs of the Few: A New System of Public Interest Intervention for New Zealand","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Intervention (counseling); Order (exchange); Public interest; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Balance (ability); Law and economics; Fair dealing; Business; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.021583600796285147,"score_gpt":0.27837090622638966,"score_spread":0.25678730543010453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784904327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8427069,0.022202885,0.005921048,0.11764674,0.0026089,0.0019103086,0.000012250865,0.00003812861,0.0069528418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98441637,0.00048522692,0.0000031320317,0.000038863913,0.0012081708,0.0000060846796,2.208102e-7,0.000012994702,0.013828953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744475,0.00043617308,0.0006669601,0.00007133103,0.00046021602,0.00092054764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981699,0.00022274931,0.0010095831,0.0002600865,0.00026471188,0.000072963885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004605338,0.00012183685,0.0002446204,0.00007260134,0.00079462543,0.00013831939,0.0013613728,0.00009147012,0.000011378517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039289755,0.000051194325,0.00043166167,0.0007065375,0.00027342056,0.00023291679,0.00009469029,0.0006486815,0.0000014792374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007219146,0.000054973745,0.0041836402,0.000050750114,0.00026843618,2.6776593e-8,0.0134984795,0.000010763041,0.00019550459,0.93550766,0.0037856314,0.042371936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003178677,0.0009406229,0.0034915144,0.0013951221,0.000446377,0.000096952455,0.35378188,0.000130767,0.0018136415,0.20666409,0.42769685,0.000363501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010502077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08285058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72884357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046395106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031813025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787932860","doi":"10.29173/alr1393","title":"Roundabout Justice: A Comment on Danyluk v. Ainsworth Technologies","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Roundabout; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.04574130954311656,"score_gpt":0.3232651807586889,"score_spread":0.2775238712155723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787932860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010239176,0.15789607,0.0000060815996,0.14250854,0.00035506734,0.0006981218,0.0000021886342,0.00018755678,0.698244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72122866,0.22549734,0.000032461565,0.04448638,0.000301561,0.00013435454,0.000003390766,0.000021770642,0.008294104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850845,0.00014407659,0.00032051673,0.00026772622,0.00038999793,0.0003692006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990818,0.00028152016,0.0001475038,0.0003333245,0.00007574599,0.00008012293],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044134838,0.00015656186,0.0003712616,0.000021697497,0.00078470557,0.00011557155,0.00042045987,0.00010713923,0.00055943086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006009667,0.00012166004,0.00010017579,0.0004257003,0.00022665688,0.0002040216,0.000055300447,0.00018066366,0.0010100614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.915238e-7,0.000074365154,0.000058374328,0.0009698043,0.00001707987,0.0000041918715,0.0008263812,2.0737838e-7,4.3222605e-7,0.86167353,0.110240825,0.026133806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007825533,0.00004503389,0.0000036198492,0.0022769729,0.00008058509,0.0000011238174,0.00029476272,0.0000023523558,0.0000050022873,0.0009261476,0.99611825,0.00016789677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06693729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03403143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88587743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012065592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032145846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788021253","doi":"10.11575/prism/29089","title":"Breaker v. Director, Southern Region, Regional Services, Alberta Environment re: Town of Strathmore (11 July 2006) , Appeal No. 05-70-DOP (A.E.A.B)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Geography; Business; Regional science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.024028933741578176,"score_gpt":0.26645950950043196,"score_spread":0.2424305757588538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788021253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32381073,0.00071586645,0.00002339855,0.003988523,0.00043304238,0.0012830902,0.0001366094,0.00001067726,0.66959804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86644256,0.00003978456,0.0002532976,0.00013471712,0.0009966684,0.00002493038,0.000057268244,0.000025466117,0.1320253],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779254,0.00014758378,0.00050066947,0.00048433352,0.0006496036,0.0004252644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989326,0.00008597355,0.00037815125,0.0003234077,0.00012925689,0.0001506124],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005251523,0.0002126869,0.00035943347,0.000041932413,0.0004193515,0.00022823797,0.0007501999,0.00019286186,0.0021570157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025180847,0.00019053507,0.000098322394,0.00022657934,0.00029069986,0.00042490364,0.00014352922,0.000101987294,0.001043931],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00090824073,0.0037849497,0.114642695,0.0005517249,0.0005140612,0.00033653274,0.16470304,0.0003773332,0.0041666287,0.008032153,0.63552034,0.0664623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041137115,0.00005190842,0.0012873021,0.00012277943,0.000032529537,0.0000044948783,0.0035718742,0.000008104686,0.0002004981,0.00039057853,0.99364537,0.0002732145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39655456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19705245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54263186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000091306545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002638692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788037232","doi":"10.29173/alr1303","title":"Schmeiser v. Monsamo: A Case Comment","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Philosophy; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.02841218055363319,"score_gpt":0.333660435587362,"score_spread":0.3052482550337288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788037232","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002020518,0.13238911,0.000026026055,0.11834712,0.00043569301,0.0011975478,0.0000033845042,0.000073471085,0.7455071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9425314,0.023269273,0.00006722655,0.032227844,0.00029054086,0.00007820017,0.000002842211,0.000014232984,0.0015184365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989017,0.000119414435,0.00027368564,0.00018761391,0.00023736327,0.00028021247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934053,0.00011098773,0.0000935008,0.00020680421,0.00007855917,0.00016960368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004940567,0.000108825545,0.00028184633,0.000010474021,0.00059386325,0.00006811672,0.00018185138,0.000056687277,0.00040432301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022668997,0.00008881809,0.0001003369,0.00027858897,0.00015103986,0.0002414721,0.000036094672,0.000094639036,0.0005786827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010102165,0.000052736515,0.000041638887,0.00058953726,0.00001620313,0.0001318825,0.00094753056,0.0000010002766,8.034715e-7,0.9871441,0.008839276,0.0022342417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013617634,0.000017485732,0.0000018595217,0.0018225227,0.000042054537,0.000058314028,0.000099266195,1.1583678e-7,0.000007127894,0.0021297468,0.99555683,0.00012850907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6063266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26903695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9867175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009000407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014543303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7443012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789499020","doi":"","title":"Alberta. Legislative Assembly. Select Special Committee on Constitutional Reform. Subcommittee B","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; General assembly; Legislative assembly; Public administration; Law; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.021029736959985685,"score_gpt":0.27277577649858564,"score_spread":0.2517460395386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789499020","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01752664,0.00017576898,0.0000024486355,0.007299701,0.0017873592,0.00037827788,0.00014678862,0.000027842592,0.9726552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856842,0.0014847458,0.000058587433,0.0003007224,0.0037715002,0.000025355142,0.00001929172,0.000015834034,0.008639777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978445,0.00013544074,0.00039314947,0.0003374564,0.00060170295,0.00068773364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810845,0.00018037185,0.00038287824,0.0004708667,0.0002970264,0.0005603908],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005283431,0.00024066777,0.000401459,0.0010812227,0.0029905215,0.00023622869,0.0008892784,0.0002620236,0.00033298146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006125641,0.00022833845,0.00021369719,0.0010045271,0.0035588273,0.0006101246,0.000043499705,0.00024505824,0.000075772536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030305453,0.000040886556,0.053696405,0.00001749283,0.00007932964,0.000018475697,0.0028409064,6.725391e-7,0.000005195566,0.8177834,0.12355824,0.0019286642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002725473,0.00009188475,0.036400218,0.00006846077,0.000024981908,0.0000011897773,0.00083667756,4.3753607e-7,0.00002589513,0.0029361388,0.9590519,0.00028964246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9626997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99563205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96815753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021850165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016136786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790589594","doi":"","title":"Industrial Relations Reform Act: materials prepared for a Continuing Legal Education seminar held in Vancouver, B.C. on September 10, 1987","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Continuing education; Law; Medicine; Medical education","score_opus":0.025098373759158264,"score_gpt":0.29399445870468477,"score_spread":0.2688960849455265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790589594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15957014,0.000040264877,6.84837e-7,0.00047037538,0.0021280227,0.00093199994,0.00012242282,0.00001822812,0.83671784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85053855,0.000026362437,0.000051166295,0.00006568738,0.0013097129,0.0001522126,0.000021630758,0.000018396488,0.14781626],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856347,0.00006958661,0.00044778563,0.0002543977,0.00025241045,0.00041233553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874586,0.0000937942,0.0004185233,0.00030060994,0.0001659668,0.0002752272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007289652,0.00014002286,0.000308521,0.0002890566,0.0006681762,0.0001806922,0.00034875152,0.00027097782,0.0002719318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010301779,0.00014501017,0.00006308442,0.00012405605,0.00012750355,0.00061827566,0.000020975627,0.00011283609,0.00001653236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037909005,0.00017864836,0.013665309,0.00017347361,0.00005746916,0.000017712871,0.020130461,0.0000075893786,0.00023025683,0.16116366,0.7636759,0.04032042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043195064,0.00006205197,0.002012195,0.00031180546,0.000018064875,2.947707e-7,0.0012668776,7.4871133e-7,0.0001753696,0.0010154074,0.9945242,0.00018103234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90991455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99223566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6909684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000654757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028930122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5913343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791532750","doi":"","title":"Constitutional jurisdiction over health and health care services in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Health care; Health services; Business; Right to health; Political science; Environmental health; Law; Medicine; Population","score_opus":0.010984279257019999,"score_gpt":0.25512025824636503,"score_spread":0.24413597898934503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791532750","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18062395,0.011592759,0.000007480763,0.028989434,0.0012619166,0.0009100191,0.000570103,0.00003442337,0.7760099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956706,0.0017747405,0.000018255972,0.0018182532,0.00020280563,0.000009169855,0.000007517073,0.000004487692,0.0004941276],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877435,0.00007917303,0.00029207408,0.00017555551,0.00028368612,0.0003951508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990127,0.000040501425,0.00013571976,0.00007648019,0.00006435717,0.0006702584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026358195,0.00008502257,0.00021271028,0.00013766406,0.00032554698,0.000015816891,0.000104216684,0.00004912664,0.000049328904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022417109,0.00007264419,0.0000158281,0.00019880844,0.0001881906,0.00017881858,0.000010078698,0.000056406574,0.0000014861681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010867573,0.000008095023,0.5594091,0.00035220158,0.000014502024,0.000014426466,0.018218422,0.0000017968935,0.0000010141233,0.34548497,0.015149416,0.06133522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021329902,0.00002407286,0.06142849,0.0001915803,0.0000013110752,7.5679424e-7,0.0031474805,2.4953337e-7,6.5368226e-7,0.00030518736,0.9345956,0.00009130404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9194462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001969336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031740356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9737488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791578309","doi":"","title":"Dr. Henry Morgentaler, Dr. Leslie Frank Smoling, Dr. Robert Scott v. Her Majesty the Queen and the Attorney General of Canada = [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Art; Law; Political science; Biology; Zoology","score_opus":0.010364286603522937,"score_gpt":0.2269972760748051,"score_spread":0.21663298947128218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791578309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18407434,0.0045093563,0.000009032968,0.035969015,0.0013544727,0.0010302672,0.00022487041,0.00002915449,0.7727995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9179853,0.0013803982,0.000015975631,0.0013836273,0.00094778254,0.000035777677,0.0000031373474,0.000031259686,0.078216724],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977117,0.00026148776,0.000497895,0.00028618058,0.0006094021,0.00063330354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984269,0.00028269851,0.0002684133,0.000347567,0.00017060485,0.00050379534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008570136,0.00021046112,0.00040650487,0.00010007519,0.0007046963,0.000048889688,0.00058150437,0.00014659151,0.0002134607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029867628,0.000117489326,0.00009876831,0.00027242533,0.0010268037,0.00017407778,0.000055171422,0.00015044869,0.00000372864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007657436,0.0000291471,0.082079515,0.00011548298,0.00020868202,0.000038412072,0.007795841,0.000010578131,0.00007074175,0.31799972,0.5835213,0.008053996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049642497,0.000017702338,0.013346598,0.00008601828,0.00003645327,0.0000020268287,0.00064614473,0.00000215618,0.00005322425,0.0016052068,0.98350745,0.00020060582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9991331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99952656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.733911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026095574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004681905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8305498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792826003","doi":"","title":"Privacy and Ethics Canada. Parliament. House of Commons. Standing Committee on Access to Information","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Parliament; House of Representatives; Political science; Commons; Select committee; Internet privacy; Privacy law; Information privacy; Public administration; Law; Business; Privacy policy; Computer science; Legislature; Politics","score_opus":0.0432929380952272,"score_gpt":0.30746690022155654,"score_spread":0.2641739621263293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792826003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6050863,0.0002898354,0.0000098224245,0.027970005,0.0010188862,0.0008622417,0.0004770399,0.000037322592,0.3642485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971209,0.0019940555,0.000041359872,0.00065369264,0.00009541143,0.0000114755985,0.0000039553074,0.000009173581,0.000069969865],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986719,0.00007490587,0.0003274844,0.000116526506,0.0004937522,0.00031542827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852014,0.00015952832,0.00034145798,0.00031220342,0.00022853188,0.00043813206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057494204,0.00011513844,0.0002456426,0.0007419274,0.0012008861,0.00025761803,0.0006656581,0.00013415315,0.000015722533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092963845,0.000114218245,0.00003760858,0.0006605433,0.00038902808,0.00078309723,0.000073440366,0.0001597539,9.70869e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004994115,0.0000256051,0.6578254,0.00030556877,0.00008043795,0.0000070275314,0.030403629,0.0000057981874,0.000006279817,0.122977726,0.17906424,0.00924835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013612157,0.000045197827,0.13206486,0.00012418546,0.00001236398,1.2739189e-7,0.0023411284,3.6985443e-7,0.000035124558,0.00041524536,0.86468863,0.0001366486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99892664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99988496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68562436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009764923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017100712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9236366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792987410","doi":"","title":"&#13;\\n\\tNative American Lands and the Keystone Pipeline Expansion: A Legal Analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MedCrave (MedCrave Group)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Forensic genetics; Forensic nursing; Forensic psychology; Pipeline (software); Forensic odontology; Criminology; Political science; Geography; Forensic science; Law; Sociology; Archaeology; Engineering; Medicine; Biology","score_opus":0.009924086392610946,"score_gpt":0.28953638450182423,"score_spread":0.2796122981092133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792987410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67535776,0.0023029114,0.049183115,0.033320334,0.0020445203,0.0021559952,0.00012569349,0.0005469678,0.23496273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99331445,0.0002024944,0.00013773965,0.0014343486,0.0024429339,0.00007199427,0.00001851876,0.000027199289,0.0023503357],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962959,0.0007795891,0.0005425334,0.00062420446,0.0010483845,0.0007093504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779105,0.00054834376,0.00039969105,0.00042951747,0.0004911679,0.0003401987],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026164087,0.00031423802,0.0008352805,0.00027155594,0.0017642691,0.0003197089,0.0005372872,0.00013936183,0.00025669453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008668308,0.00020853,0.0002491423,0.0027031086,0.008273681,0.0003005894,0.00017218529,0.00032074086,0.00023890892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023813136,0.00062625395,0.09005316,0.00013548972,0.0039754785,0.00020748907,0.4333061,0.000015643043,0.0011723212,0.3105451,0.015392158,0.1421895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010645403,0.0015755575,0.10801245,0.00021521146,0.004263927,0.000046128043,0.20498618,0.010984701,0.001049235,0.025561888,0.6295516,0.0031077447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13137758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12993607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6141594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010516354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015526045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793178950","doi":"","title":"British Columbia Courthouse Library Society.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Library science; Archaeology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.011893988654213842,"score_gpt":0.2308396368792842,"score_spread":0.21894564822507034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793178950","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1523092,0.001637894,8.014787e-7,0.0031162803,0.0010079277,0.00033804742,0.00022164917,0.000103726234,0.8412645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9362947,0.030954484,0.00031385277,0.0004685857,0.0011970093,0.000025502832,0.000014001862,0.000038964426,0.030692922],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846196,0.000058427457,0.00028565558,0.00026703018,0.00035851917,0.0005684003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985621,0.000047712972,0.00026006595,0.00038606333,0.00011825934,0.0006258025],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030513573,0.00010661508,0.00027651235,0.00022094218,0.002192981,0.0014006278,0.00084786414,0.00022890953,0.0012581355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018187822,0.00016533186,0.00024984896,0.0008428695,0.0014687518,0.0010166641,0.000056495137,0.00012633619,0.000011362892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001527761,0.000016751748,0.33299765,0.0000353513,0.00003930313,0.000024519353,0.0014826142,6.660875e-8,0.000002200512,0.003557159,0.6562176,0.0056252903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013450105,0.000021480606,0.112242326,0.00006602038,0.000018455492,0.0000011252083,0.0011156279,2.6008072e-7,0.0000019557556,0.0017092213,0.8844952,0.00019382489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9963214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81057155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025234618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011056692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996548},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2793204109","doi":"10.29173/alr1410","title":"Exporting Trust: Does E-Commerce Need a Canadian Privacy Seal of Approval","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Merge (version control); Data Protection Act 1998; Personally identifiable information; Consumer protection; Legislature; Business; Privacy policy; The Internet; Internet privacy; Skepticism; Information privacy; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Commerce; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.026224423997142726,"score_gpt":0.30874912102203794,"score_spread":0.28252469702489524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793204109","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07394412,0.022915881,0.0000030675558,0.024867501,0.0003752225,0.0010329065,0.0000043189434,0.000029941286,0.87682706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98595196,0.008247403,0.0000358927,0.0028471411,0.0003156001,0.000029212273,0.0000068622076,0.000013559082,0.0025523591],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838823,0.0001631497,0.0005125673,0.0002120644,0.00028951405,0.00043446146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989324,0.00014878043,0.00026246064,0.0002342121,0.00012118984,0.00030092383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085251365,0.00012596036,0.00044571204,0.000030074367,0.00040425436,0.000047348,0.00037052043,0.00008180907,0.0007564232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007750463,0.00009290852,0.00012277966,0.0004987132,0.00016181693,0.00027932215,0.00003243666,0.000109592525,0.00004877497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008338152,0.00007797478,0.042631023,0.003295451,0.00007419916,0.00002421794,0.010355573,5.2490117e-7,0.000022715098,0.91264933,0.008144715,0.022715952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007836845,0.000013576397,0.00029693067,0.0013949913,0.000040814302,0.0000033861797,0.00029082486,0.0000020550478,0.000010678504,0.0004491305,0.9972778,0.00014142087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9778677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96294916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9891331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007682925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004777297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8282304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793245889","doi":"","title":"The Future of Mandatory Reporting Laws: Developing a Legal and Policy Framework for Determining What Reporting Obligations to Impose on Professionals","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.037156213831801684,"score_gpt":0.3919334695615314,"score_spread":0.35477725572972973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793245889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92696214,0.0038128337,0.0002878047,0.012525447,0.0023598808,0.0016023753,0.000017205399,0.00006092572,0.052371394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98664224,0.00089200423,0.0029314097,0.000049225862,0.00072561327,0.000004828911,0.000018051735,0.000016785158,0.008719831],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984549,0.000072732604,0.00056483067,0.00027804574,0.00037752892,0.00025192066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99219334,0.00029632926,0.006683064,0.00024127771,0.00048662804,0.00009933396],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016658944,0.00013952955,0.00041735487,0.00005574864,0.0029698296,0.00017267135,0.00033746252,0.00030262247,0.00003488317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039750957,0.0001340457,0.00012107306,0.0000776232,0.00011082482,0.00088707905,0.00005494947,0.00016168234,4.0431732e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030900413,0.000038001093,0.0015291949,0.0009774871,0.00016516396,0.000021255339,0.33954227,0.0000019765312,0.0002685127,0.20450228,0.00055450614,0.45209032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019522314,0.00011664078,0.062438585,0.0061811362,0.00008176016,0.0000016710734,0.88746786,0.000005074797,0.00019806692,0.0023571725,0.04062682,0.00032998258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.109001204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42087987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5479256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024477107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015457751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99832815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793313343","doi":"","title":"Bill C-30: Response to the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in R. v. Shoker Act","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01851392975246272,"score_gpt":0.26933735344206966,"score_spread":0.2508234236896069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793313343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45601755,0.00013527709,0.0000018013884,0.014088713,0.00066616334,0.0004783052,0.00009029635,0.00000585066,0.52851605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99111944,0.00008322717,0.00003201464,0.00036473983,0.00022060703,0.000014116678,6.4216636e-7,0.000012217974,0.008152977],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980888,0.00015636574,0.00037285202,0.00019943304,0.0007124065,0.0004701927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825054,0.00034669213,0.00019276598,0.0004981798,0.00024090182,0.00047091348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020192557,0.00011377607,0.00027308648,0.00021795828,0.0006777859,0.00006716645,0.00089566835,0.00009967569,0.0001712785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036167149,0.00008138871,0.000046162786,0.00022176054,0.00018578739,0.00016523473,0.00005186713,0.00011644536,0.000007650828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007672112,0.0000619266,0.22944114,0.00008382697,0.00006890074,0.00023906965,0.035266995,0.00014813273,0.0001629631,0.031165363,0.66063184,0.041962635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012903809,0.000025202278,0.14547151,0.00008154743,0.0000047787235,3.3340223e-7,0.00069826667,0.0000014377531,0.000022642986,0.00054218184,0.8529169,0.00010616524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9997855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5351019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047989495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01033587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793575832","doi":"10.11575/prism/33989","title":"Whatever Happened To ... Roncarelli v. Duplessis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.017404904786310144,"score_gpt":0.23950198193727348,"score_spread":0.22209707715096333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793575832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5379926,0.0010113653,0.051094778,0.004179935,0.0006484497,0.00042297144,6.546961e-7,0.00012618439,0.40452304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98711854,0.000086252105,0.0032054896,0.00013120838,0.00009143238,2.7726298e-7,0.0000013802709,0.000006332292,0.009359106],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906653,0.000081263286,0.00008042108,0.00012819745,0.00032307304,0.00032051528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994,0.000039979303,0.000075009935,0.00011621918,0.00008218597,0.00028658513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037168383,0.00007091836,0.00017000377,0.00007512599,0.00045078984,0.000019044117,0.0002828909,0.00010267901,0.00054675253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052848558,0.00008379245,0.00007036616,0.000257722,0.00013902178,0.0006178367,0.00009127479,0.00007138468,0.00026405504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016388154,0.00039625532,0.09898531,0.00014244486,0.00015143583,0.000025581256,0.25731447,0.0000016088977,0.0010605946,0.11285427,0.054978434,0.4739257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024035075,0.000031835592,0.034491997,0.000042379976,0.000035555324,3.0918306e-7,0.004840627,0.00003161526,0.00016635281,0.00038708688,0.9595271,0.00020482803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044153765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008478424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90454865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007616399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010513025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9622113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793845714","doi":"","title":"Provincial Judges' Association of British Columbia. Conference","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Political science; History; Psychology","score_opus":0.008456671860181576,"score_gpt":0.20935247317022854,"score_spread":0.20089580131004697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793845714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4857159,0.00038090613,0.0000046316914,0.0024463588,0.0008073768,0.0004836118,0.0013975304,0.000048506517,0.50871515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831533,0.0038169834,0.000046423585,0.00006628069,0.0003898384,0.000019184243,0.0000059400804,0.000011202914,0.012490861],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983628,0.00012269725,0.0003841771,0.00020508574,0.00048887526,0.00043639567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985247,0.0001315187,0.00034423242,0.00013080855,0.00055478426,0.00031393638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059303036,0.00007776983,0.00028302183,0.00039434605,0.00023533417,0.000082763894,0.0002980331,0.00022116206,0.00036329948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006692245,0.00009761976,0.00011842434,0.001597155,0.0004885267,0.00030235955,0.000017886778,0.00005444201,0.0000056914214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004655359,0.000030974166,0.76055473,0.000050290833,0.000047398782,0.000005447063,0.0011323395,2.2951562e-8,0.000105121464,0.008603098,0.212773,0.016692955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022012775,0.00005119818,0.11931247,0.000103867984,0.00002245594,3.4140191e-7,0.0005883228,3.9450722e-8,0.000012487097,0.0020199218,0.8775124,0.00015639985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9925414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6647394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014479962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014206889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39808184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795930076","doi":"","title":"Canada Update: Pursuing Just Desserts: The Supreme Court of Canada Clarifies Damage Awards from Charter Breaches","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.039861434050896954,"score_gpt":0.23718386133171715,"score_spread":0.1973224272808202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795930076","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85925955,0.00041360708,0.0007937585,0.0022686382,0.00090072013,0.00037371676,0.00088997994,0.00006604031,0.13503397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99530184,0.000026031697,0.0007254253,0.0002390915,0.00017966823,7.834758e-7,0.000013272509,0.00001841279,0.0034954434],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733293,0.0009938763,0.00023561962,0.0003222225,0.0006791281,0.0004361962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986765,0.00020959179,0.0002437443,0.00036586713,0.00028744573,0.0002168794],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015327933,0.0001874827,0.00031292002,0.00006652735,0.001409555,0.000094795716,0.0010308016,0.00014434714,0.00044766435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035185434,0.00015967657,0.000078296565,0.0005136125,0.00031151657,0.0004009814,0.00011619955,0.00047237673,0.0000054747115],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009619459,0.00042232915,0.28712168,0.0004009114,0.00205213,0.000995511,0.5074669,0.00004760265,0.005639095,0.14261453,0.037549246,0.014728073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003176873,0.000014979633,0.010061138,0.000062359424,0.00015772854,6.407666e-7,0.2867551,0.000006439344,0.0014749285,0.00054048066,0.7002498,0.0003587314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99969876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99969655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66270053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045938257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047006533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796141458","doi":"","title":"Canada Update: A New Framework for Determining Jurisdiction, the Application of the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens, and Limitations of the Solicitor-Client Privilege","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Doctrine; Jurisdiction; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02582153148283101,"score_gpt":0.2684698756026286,"score_spread":0.24264834411979758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796141458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8819026,0.00042817506,0.10470818,0.004876022,0.00086923304,0.001715579,0.00022004411,0.000018066108,0.005262112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969316,0.000027721791,0.002507488,0.00006921163,0.00012534134,0.00000222241,9.950827e-7,0.0000059431513,0.00032947503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897563,0.00031097856,0.00018537104,0.0001047528,0.0002520756,0.00017116123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985761,0.0005545639,0.00041908713,0.00022477437,0.00015964534,0.00006581864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089046755,0.00007101381,0.00014809263,0.00003369396,0.00072631607,0.000014900404,0.00039271606,0.000075400305,0.0000022583624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008765874,0.000044879795,0.00007696929,0.00052078435,0.00023160463,0.00015661932,0.00008554763,0.0001590806,2.685719e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001353012,0.00013855846,0.25726587,0.0001863092,0.00020320895,2.153262e-7,0.08827404,0.000075677795,0.0036664412,0.60378903,0.00086270296,0.04540267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004549173,0.000034986715,0.0211,0.0001131143,0.00023266055,5.818614e-7,0.061962996,0.00005777061,0.0044004214,0.004413349,0.9070717,0.00015746591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21826692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29641607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90620905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007342171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006066863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7869387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2798095494","doi":"10.29173/alr1347","title":"Health Care Reform and the Law in Canada: Meeting the Challenge, Timothy A. Caulfield &amp; Barbara von Tigerstrom, eds. (Edmonton: University of alberta Press, 2002)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.015242604907607161,"score_gpt":0.2488093476599681,"score_spread":0.23356674275236095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2798095494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004285119,0.34980083,3.7290613e-7,0.029618476,0.000095087584,0.0006809463,0.0000028270813,0.0000037199695,0.6193692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8232019,0.17179124,0.000010054361,0.0029777829,0.0000633129,0.000007464882,0.0000029261066,0.000010291873,0.0019350168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980962,0.00065439777,0.00035079074,0.00023819458,0.00031832582,0.0003420846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866617,0.00054078014,0.0002733628,0.00031806115,0.00009162528,0.00011000873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010866149,0.0001395974,0.00052015897,0.0000066905905,0.00069188606,0.000026081354,0.00035394,0.00006414203,0.00011362127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026656673,0.00008680306,0.00007034396,0.00019930517,0.000368909,0.00015212361,0.000053144886,0.00019761665,0.0000051995853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019786725,0.000017761073,0.0002042435,0.0017572386,0.000041127234,0.0000021319563,0.022581955,0.0000020369887,1.3728408e-7,0.96520793,0.0079898955,0.0021757768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002301066,0.000012458404,0.000032771288,0.0013270279,0.00003364937,0.0000012092268,0.0031251134,7.738057e-7,0.0000012693358,0.00012721558,0.9950037,0.00010471169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99984854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99997026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9870138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035236968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010618663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5321498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802442146","doi":"","title":"Food as a Dangerous Product: The Promise of Private Law for Public Health","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"St. Jude Medical; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Fraser Health Authority","keywords":"Public health; Business; Product (mathematics); Law; Public health law; Environmental health; Political science; Medicine; Health care; Health policy; Public health policy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.047940402726698965,"score_gpt":0.3181412321099093,"score_spread":0.27020082938321033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802442146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07814193,0.0077576567,0.00004546832,0.014420055,0.0010450112,0.0034893483,0.000097695876,0.00007566959,0.89492714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9619925,0.0004873403,0.00016801422,0.00002336393,0.00021962302,0.0000036003964,0.000050895702,0.000014517242,0.037040126],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987591,0.00012509391,0.00013455338,0.00026804305,0.0004102236,0.00030297608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798375,0.000053420335,0.0010658517,0.00034117218,0.0004377867,0.000118016316],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008695175,0.00013447682,0.00042242408,0.000022647715,0.0015711467,0.0000575049,0.00084568845,0.00015904976,0.0004686583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024432925,0.00012940008,0.00015564648,0.00005169298,0.000322025,0.00055721746,0.00003512711,0.000101694175,0.0000030637987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039860228,0.00019229366,0.000073506555,0.0023273006,0.00034630444,0.0000016820852,0.5719822,3.482739e-7,0.00018670806,0.28516677,0.004300726,0.13502358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008251665,0.0010011905,0.0073986338,0.00048646206,0.00011988202,4.6902974e-7,0.20631507,0.0000012758339,0.00014525019,0.0017035467,0.7816169,0.0003861328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8145846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.918635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8838506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025263015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013981612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804163518","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3259","title":"Residual Discretion: The Concept of Forum of Necessity under the Court Jurisdiction and Proceedings Transfer Act","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Plaintiff; Law; Discretion; Competence (human resources); Statute; Inherent powers; Political science; Exclusive jurisdiction; Scope (computer science); Personal jurisdiction; Constitution; Economics; Computer science; Management","score_opus":0.016132068405202284,"score_gpt":0.28193297070808054,"score_spread":0.2658009023028783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804163518","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29594806,0.0016986872,0.0053147054,0.05204204,0.0009355418,0.00056586706,0.000022220398,0.000036776728,0.64343613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986656,0.00011969993,0.000019373272,0.0001664671,0.00087043963,0.0000019802624,2.469663e-7,0.0000060754887,0.00015013719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988628,0.00010117514,0.0002706146,0.000095792166,0.00047819462,0.0001914385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992587,0.0000774058,0.00017335638,0.000056701334,0.0003675729,0.00006626248],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011410402,0.00007585544,0.00015258136,0.000015271338,0.001634539,0.00012676867,0.0002366343,0.00008071614,0.0001002286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003021114,0.000040079263,0.000055542325,0.00014192797,0.0014582695,0.00040512683,0.000018200159,0.00020652406,9.922832e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006701764,0.00003270828,0.0015763749,0.000015054891,0.00004663435,3.823763e-7,0.017289732,0.00000332343,0.00039691763,0.9781863,0.0012898372,0.0010957001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030297264,0.0019366768,0.03494531,0.0009749895,0.0005530301,0.00018694096,0.2331898,0.000108853754,0.029628644,0.5267369,0.16796477,0.00074431935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032236863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.082513265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70271754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000237667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011250177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W28212462","doi":"10.1111/gcb.13667","title":"Hardship and the Granting of Zoning Variances: A New Test in Light of Rousseau v. Zoning Board of Appeals , 17 Neb. App. 469, 764 N.W.2d 130 (2009)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nebraska law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Zoning; Test (biology); Law; Psychology; Political science; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.036507085924172546,"score_gpt":0.28705960188110174,"score_spread":0.2505525159569292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W28212462","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017611036,0.5283055,0.00026987697,0.0031031873,0.000379701,0.0024631533,0.000015202027,0.0000794231,0.44777295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739454,0.024458608,0.0005608487,0.00044947985,0.00020318165,0.00002409731,8.734718e-7,0.000019233237,0.00033832845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739414,0.00039661373,0.0010789301,0.0002883555,0.00046809053,0.00037387572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794036,0.00049524766,0.0009878955,0.00028105231,0.00018633044,0.00010912449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00328555,0.00018710391,0.0010938556,0.00005019926,0.00021736411,0.000038277016,0.00047956326,0.00011408632,0.00008826439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013823564,0.00012980883,0.0001567225,0.00084718055,0.0005149987,0.00035885608,0.00009151338,0.00019737272,0.0000043752298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000769642,0.00021027734,0.027906917,0.014652566,0.00011115363,0.000011658069,0.03973072,0.0000026032324,0.00071182434,0.88475347,0.0019931204,0.02983874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0047955913,0.000551102,0.0097346045,0.1293889,0.00091877865,0.000017939783,0.006618191,0.000035654233,0.0033457538,0.037695304,0.8055035,0.0013946927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12928058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013647021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9563343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020822974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031919335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8765176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885134652","doi":"10.5195/lawreview.2018.566","title":"The Hidden History of Northern Civil Rights Law and the Villainous Supreme Court, 1875-1915","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Pittsburgh Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Criminal Justice Association","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Civil rights; Political science","score_opus":0.01383021113524075,"score_gpt":0.22448203352422996,"score_spread":0.21065182238898922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885134652","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028528771,0.2116974,0.000054236232,0.0035008828,0.00045650822,0.00084266195,0.000004671795,0.00004222762,0.7805485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97302926,0.025191125,0.000008486521,0.00035341727,0.00013309582,4.2846702e-7,3.921816e-7,0.0000048347497,0.0012789818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998731,0.000395922,0.00019650784,0.00015000977,0.00034721653,0.00017934937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987361,0.00028422006,0.00029604,0.00024548627,0.00036835516,0.00006980039],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014329584,0.0000913204,0.0003545569,0.000011314098,0.0009976127,0.000012834718,0.00045125477,0.00005876373,0.0001475359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009724599,0.000057268193,0.00011811028,0.00012196663,0.004607467,0.00013930458,0.00007078203,0.000083138555,0.000008941215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020463207,0.000015679907,0.000088562316,0.0002477716,0.00004034941,0.000002371652,0.0065761753,2.7736872e-8,0.0000034061734,0.9863538,0.0059295543,0.00072184985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025670906,0.00003214628,0.000025945494,0.0005694845,0.00009812472,9.939472e-7,0.00065125624,4.3844145e-7,0.0000024428964,0.01587829,0.982409,0.00007516915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20385139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34377328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9764795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012858212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023700942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886144973","doi":"10.29173/alr1448","title":"Case Comment on R. v. Marshall","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.03618848562604948,"score_gpt":0.3229803431907318,"score_spread":0.28679185756468234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886144973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000976308,0.022782614,2.3836573e-7,0.04027508,0.00011500153,0.00044518604,0.0000018814712,0.000025529736,0.93537813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.802233,0.060563214,0.000012135095,0.117521234,0.00042847876,0.00006604492,0.0000048145153,0.000016906146,0.019154191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989426,0.00019882068,0.0002265059,0.00017523144,0.00022112022,0.00023570575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938977,0.00020078328,0.000052386054,0.00019465196,0.00003375518,0.00012862677],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044714773,0.000096914555,0.00024192476,0.0000065917666,0.00045261273,0.00005001071,0.00016096841,0.00004714805,0.0071566147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008636488,0.00007719503,0.00008159533,0.00017175567,0.0000928499,0.00012364674,0.00001129075,0.0000823578,0.00211908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004045441,0.0000824033,0.000026714639,0.0006128106,0.000017458007,0.00021404236,0.0008639583,3.1607726e-7,1.7191272e-7,0.82328606,0.106718846,0.06817315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005984324,0.000029088835,0.0000016029936,0.0012561663,0.00002397569,0.000041570744,0.000022700573,3.0588848e-7,0.0000015518286,0.00043718537,0.99801993,0.00010605965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34285307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0954565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91622394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004413564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042249783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886965970","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Legal Research Guide: Prince Edward Island","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; History; Geography; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.06726609954820885,"score_gpt":0.35776436375410897,"score_spread":0.29049826420590014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886965970","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000045236564,0.0041917134,0.0000075342496,0.010432261,0.0030509636,0.00088516506,0.00022762612,0.00029099506,0.9808685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010995663,0.00407228,0.00032799336,0.0017976384,0.01086869,0.000081920385,0.00012965105,0.0001242867,0.9716019],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99393296,0.00079012895,0.0008394452,0.00087391445,0.001711513,0.0018520637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968342,0.00036974458,0.00021566843,0.0006552742,0.0007119415,0.0012131318],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032488212,0.00040298814,0.00066294096,0.00080581463,0.002197496,0.0013786155,0.0022863806,0.0012206979,0.013500751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015184627,0.0003550345,0.00019181412,0.0012423184,0.0009538582,0.0014442685,0.00033576222,0.0012775308,0.0016121004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053534127,0.00001571894,0.0006976561,0.00012225816,0.000038912232,0.00010614071,0.0024999273,1.0793579e-7,3.9712887e-7,0.094168626,0.9006534,0.0016914639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008728095,0.000055882523,0.000079358164,0.00035300863,0.000015801083,0.0000031269005,0.0022035318,5.245238e-7,0.000018463556,0.0058733984,0.99082184,0.00048778456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99167466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9898987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0901684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049859815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022566708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888642844","doi":"","title":"Forum [Invited Papers]: FORWARD TO THE PAST: The 2005 CASW Code of Ethics","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social work review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Code (set theory); Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Programming language; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.033162741697677835,"score_gpt":0.3149727705498449,"score_spread":0.28181002885216705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888642844","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031785798,0.0832226,0.0000109627845,0.7902474,0.00044937924,0.0012828215,0.00007538083,0.000026082875,0.124367535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8904721,0.010727927,0.000021216623,0.08789031,0.003435087,0.00015865036,0.00001580086,0.00003664533,0.0072422666],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783695,0.00049781404,0.00036750318,0.00017802729,0.0004887599,0.0006309416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988682,0.00027612966,0.00017337174,0.0001984801,0.00022754614,0.00025626135],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00226597,0.00012981407,0.00033569487,0.00003381823,0.0026537164,0.000086739536,0.0006044615,0.00018073914,0.00024934838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006633939,0.00008225432,0.00017895359,0.0015607695,0.00033455616,0.000060869,0.000030248275,0.00035357813,0.00009058133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017905653,0.000005763266,0.0013672436,0.00022482584,0.000018373541,0.000003076089,0.004279102,0.0000012798879,0.0000011834017,0.048750453,0.9322526,0.01309432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000328487,0.000006066382,0.0008255278,0.0005501561,0.000047217483,3.5427433e-7,0.0020276816,8.708343e-8,6.086712e-7,0.0006200464,0.995775,0.000114414455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4671355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9623621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89015424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002687884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010251917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889948538","doi":"","title":"Same-sex marriage in Canada: The impact of legal marriage on the first cohort of gay and lesbian Canadians to wed.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ePrints Soton (University of Southampton)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Same sex; Gender studies; Homosexuality; Psychology; Cohort; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.01045308544132911,"score_gpt":0.22436262443193655,"score_spread":0.21390953899060744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889948538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96511513,0.000007306454,0.000005461923,0.0030903071,0.00011135438,0.00043318138,0.00009193132,0.000004666301,0.031140631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99902165,0.000009505849,0.000010459694,0.00006784212,0.00003777413,7.4021847e-7,9.627827e-7,0.0000056358413,0.0008454533],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896955,0.00009018328,0.00015484229,0.00018873952,0.00034246812,0.00025418663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991278,0.00019370473,0.00017112923,0.0002630483,0.000086590684,0.0001577171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080263533,0.00010195115,0.00026514241,0.000080405545,0.00036500517,0.000016846516,0.0005231084,0.00007672864,0.0008467919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017581575,0.00007898668,0.00007358828,0.00031299057,0.0004168393,0.00010041178,0.00009516759,0.000236024,0.0000054345114],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007248787,0.000045366607,0.9272313,0.000035052468,0.000082770755,0.000018919336,0.05896994,0.0000702485,0.00040639914,0.009566531,0.0024129841,0.0010879973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002485819,0.000046776997,0.9242774,0.0000657932,0.000014845894,7.55286e-7,0.06262916,0.000024284265,0.0001466431,0.00023718055,0.01217296,0.00013557097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.999215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033906467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024298286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015558825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9271778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890043845","doi":"10.11575/prism/32768","title":"An Evaluation of the Cost of Family Law Disputes: Measuring the Cost Implication of Various Dispute Resolution Methods","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.07189602198828637,"score_gpt":0.3458588539410936,"score_spread":0.27396283195280724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890043845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53094876,0.00061962573,0.3708935,0.00194712,0.00042022808,0.0020863307,0.000007670976,0.000026690135,0.093050085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976597,0.00005563219,0.00219708,0.000009120399,0.00002066591,0.0000013424209,0.0000018257664,0.000003684032,0.00005095532],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982312,0.0006783091,0.00017899917,0.00013646501,0.00065952924,0.000115519455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979226,0.000119268334,0.0007980587,0.00047407026,0.000644181,0.0000418359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034115287,0.000060002512,0.00019117432,0.00003184809,0.000987741,0.000018578608,0.00080361107,0.000088730274,0.000008539667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035513393,0.000048282574,0.00008896001,0.00013786374,0.0008868475,0.00043699794,0.00011503445,0.00008524691,4.7635442e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013631395,0.00027465954,0.010312426,0.00019056656,0.00014231993,3.6370514e-7,0.04687668,0.000084110994,0.038427755,0.24997695,0.00019679891,0.65338105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012145239,0.00012725349,0.9198401,0.00030373211,0.00055757805,4.3794628e-7,0.0049330094,0.0331196,0.0075341947,0.018263428,0.013878247,0.00022790805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14268056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054862155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90952766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000865976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002599426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8630284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893792851","doi":"10.5703/1288284316712","title":"The Long Arm of the Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Purdue Pharma (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.018408331854230887,"score_gpt":0.3025642271002901,"score_spread":0.28415589524605916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893792851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029534452,0.0001026967,0.000021305454,0.004687272,0.00050076505,0.00008232969,2.5943316e-7,0.000014214362,0.9650567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98862946,0.000009696554,0.000003598175,0.00030720115,0.0005359845,0.0000014479061,1.25822295e-8,0.0000015471029,0.010511042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995391,0.000052778767,0.00007472275,0.000043054428,0.00018771767,0.00010265039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967796,0.00007226812,0.000040890776,0.000093048475,0.00009748073,0.00001837798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042073388,0.000021738331,0.000036542908,0.0000022020383,0.0009878728,0.000045397628,0.0002472602,0.00002261811,0.00012480939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009851542,0.000009060562,0.000026036338,0.00013311495,0.0007884866,0.00005680115,0.000030402836,0.000027098755,0.00003376827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012741638,0.000005935405,0.0013410556,0.0000015985186,0.0000030485476,3.7725677e-8,0.003220988,3.3270293e-8,0.000023060811,0.9915893,0.002711551,0.0011021376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040382292,0.000023707129,0.002372126,0.000012882359,0.0000038134128,1.2540623e-7,0.0040645353,0.0000017702296,0.0031503136,0.025071891,0.96522015,0.00003828128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056747522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20204121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9665174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008560866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006429126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9495337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894481999","doi":"","title":"Devalued Liberty and Undue Deference: The Tort of False Imprisonment and the Law of Solitary Confinement","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Law Foundation of British Columbia","keywords":"Tort; Law; Deference; Plaintiff; Political science; Dignity; Imprisonment; Prison; Supreme court; Liability","score_opus":0.01757136329170218,"score_gpt":0.2777668288321548,"score_spread":0.26019546554045264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894481999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86618435,0.0041738977,0.00003460107,0.0031530897,0.0002689432,0.00071283214,0.000018344588,0.000019474854,0.12543447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983714,0.00025915285,0.00005686054,0.00064532075,0.00026766566,0.00001454753,8.029682e-7,0.0000051029865,0.00037914424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870735,0.00023010917,0.00030844362,0.00016796135,0.00038451696,0.00020160947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918133,0.00021048359,0.00016635351,0.00019886972,0.0001474824,0.000095494215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013201066,0.00009833692,0.00024068634,0.0000102192425,0.0005661831,0.000064512686,0.00023082341,0.00007108185,0.00020200717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012790372,0.000053296186,0.000042450585,0.000105782514,0.002273002,0.00012422423,0.00009101369,0.000100202895,0.000006545941],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010911578,0.00004314728,0.0065252157,0.00007042205,0.00008022273,6.130118e-7,0.010960651,7.359911e-7,0.00029397194,0.9789401,0.0013826723,0.001593128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006274794,0.0010618693,0.055414822,0.0005590785,0.0004556294,0.000007457499,0.045267742,0.00011476624,0.011330566,0.18129162,0.69734347,0.00087816664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16012757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062435318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7976485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018709483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011838633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9546728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894919336","doi":"10.11575/prism/33992","title":"Whatever Happened to ... R. v. Sault Ste. Marie: the Due Diligence Defence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Due diligence; Forensic engineering; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.012373272219103584,"score_gpt":0.2188905559664028,"score_spread":0.20651728374729922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894919336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72756416,0.00060905796,0.053843755,0.021234218,0.00050366716,0.0013588215,7.501053e-7,0.0001387022,0.1947469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98577404,0.00011573143,0.0014095616,0.00032144893,0.000038953327,0.0000014740834,7.7465666e-7,0.000005602855,0.012332401],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884963,0.00012073564,0.00010627969,0.00021060328,0.0004306688,0.00028209007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991976,0.00012932546,0.00009913616,0.00020479252,0.00019306871,0.00017606036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003501105,0.00008766605,0.00016705676,0.00004634525,0.00083826575,0.00007088353,0.00069027656,0.000096464144,0.0007129567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014991402,0.00007863373,0.00006789796,0.00035499895,0.00035422,0.00063868274,0.00016842234,0.00011254589,0.00046342265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001206764,0.00022290328,0.022191275,0.00014507242,0.00013522444,0.00006752591,0.18152842,0.000010253994,0.0018678369,0.08693194,0.06926222,0.6375167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005094582,0.00014688754,0.16296764,0.00015165642,0.00007669967,0.0000017787565,0.025211124,0.0008066531,0.0004653263,0.010387638,0.79862607,0.0006490793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15231808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023851981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72936386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005716436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017679427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8533267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898703881","doi":"","title":"Guides de recherche · Research guides: Droits de la personne au Canada: Législation","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.37468108746925405,"score_gpt":0.47206012185029744,"score_spread":0.0973790343810434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898703881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013053231,0.006083935,0.0004100876,0.00817101,0.0018703752,0.000714673,0.000060182723,0.00012667327,0.96950984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4669358,0.0037482106,0.004690874,0.0010838051,0.011036794,0.00012632937,0.00004094986,0.00013062131,0.5122066],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98168766,0.011762009,0.0011194668,0.00095484196,0.0020876348,0.0023883556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890762,0.007453607,0.00047090155,0.0005167846,0.0016752501,0.00080723676],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.038901243,0.00056439004,0.00084273174,0.0002943471,0.0023694576,0.00044748755,0.0016676353,0.002944031,0.0032562667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020225037,0.0005446432,0.00022867163,0.0019779273,0.0019258062,0.00058445026,0.0002580167,0.0028159951,0.00018011265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031253163,0.00010549288,0.0059875958,0.00068419107,0.00016622234,0.00011291679,0.05078772,0.000014623974,0.0001245754,0.33546627,0.5919666,0.014552512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001970269,0.0001126318,0.0013382746,0.0009827672,0.00008104207,0.000024275207,0.024434302,0.00008782642,0.00032559677,0.053800933,0.9179625,0.0006528234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9994981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45730326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016256427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07314417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900409787","doi":"","title":"Testing the Jurisdictional Waters: The Provincial Regulation of Interprovincial Pipelines","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Federalism; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Political science; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Constitution; Law; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.015678449520153962,"score_gpt":0.2738930200858683,"score_spread":0.25821457056571434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900409787","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94993234,0.0008552466,0.006669316,0.015117845,0.0020392751,0.00056448224,0.0000044029644,0.00007268249,0.024744418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896701,0.000048545873,0.000023745248,0.00010105213,0.009383565,0.0000047599756,4.8391166e-7,0.000008882577,0.00075884257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978873,0.0002448302,0.00033049975,0.00011351331,0.00052109954,0.0009027604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988378,0.00016706929,0.0003072003,0.000091929134,0.0005600247,0.000035946065],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004211122,0.000085746186,0.000109711145,0.000041811676,0.0018249067,0.000116490795,0.0004217244,0.00006532523,0.000025737198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058105506,0.000044897875,0.00007267508,0.00032772776,0.00058409036,0.00028178055,0.000039742765,0.0006086385,0.000014057247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024807992,0.00009473322,0.012469272,0.00001545896,0.00014840461,6.960774e-7,0.027186204,0.000024700908,0.0038370115,0.81651354,0.0017595806,0.1377023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038053165,0.00059903075,0.008741385,0.000083504805,0.00007159609,0.00005971514,0.01906866,0.00024114229,0.00046402295,0.93860155,0.031488925,0.00019993176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008543149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030188827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13750237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036963794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045875804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901817107","doi":"","title":"Distilling Duty: The Supreme Court of Canada Amends Anns","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Duty; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.09904062580052556,"score_gpt":0.30247117218939124,"score_spread":0.20343054638886568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901817107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98497725,0.00028578806,0.00008480528,0.0021490208,0.00044555662,0.00021968797,0.000037033795,0.0000636613,0.011737217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98497343,0.0001081784,0.0000034103557,0.0002338503,0.00024383765,7.0689237e-7,0.0000025219065,0.000017510241,0.014416534],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997811,0.00031970962,0.00025718776,0.00031033528,0.0007750097,0.00052675593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987482,0.00018606418,0.0002450224,0.00031878415,0.00025845587,0.00024346581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057590636,0.00018366217,0.00028162514,0.00011137163,0.0010074716,0.00018300286,0.0009385276,0.00012871913,0.00013658866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014020834,0.0001650835,0.00009190982,0.000662957,0.00032603927,0.00089906005,0.0001371521,0.00034232248,0.000024609564],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019003895,0.00005305491,0.9922925,0.000043603104,0.000056605455,0.000092846116,0.0051604975,0.000029605573,0.00008561953,0.0017238365,0.000051575786,0.00039119986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009745142,0.00012906133,0.5785371,0.00037196328,0.00016897995,0.000010544248,0.013625919,0.0000029856337,0.00091078924,0.0004473794,0.40398207,0.0008386761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08203498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9198901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8378551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034040734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004152042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9240778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903030359","doi":"","title":"“Revenge Porn”, Tort Law, and Changing Socio-Technological Realities: A Commentary on Doe 464533 v ND","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of law and technology","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Liability","score_opus":0.02352344111494002,"score_gpt":0.2844934128313727,"score_spread":0.26096997171643266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903030359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56518835,0.0046498063,0.000018690745,0.27115446,0.0006989158,0.000288217,0.00004669391,0.000077525365,0.15787734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964838,0.00021660089,0.00003984045,0.0027708584,0.00031461747,0.0000031985592,5.297881e-7,0.0000073649258,0.00016319199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990886,0.000041534724,0.00021342679,0.00013843764,0.0001229841,0.00039505944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991759,0.000047068657,0.00023782522,0.0001621817,0.00009506986,0.00028197342],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006584368,0.00010212198,0.0002707341,0.00021364556,0.0023284673,0.00017293122,0.0003683436,0.00033375417,0.000025717854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017773702,0.00008681853,0.00003366572,0.000085614265,0.0024172673,0.0002268344,0.000044477798,0.0003380752,0.0000015373247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004389222,0.000007325893,0.0032911163,0.000012222298,0.000024635085,0.00021994386,0.0012188694,2.6999821e-8,0.000012822259,0.9894168,0.0015685186,0.0042233346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031571215,0.00022878587,0.00018763063,0.00016484752,0.000021551694,0.000085380765,0.006833391,4.956793e-7,0.00010910301,0.14585085,0.8460519,0.00015039189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12906942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34815305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8444833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011281807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023639438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903346198","doi":"10.29173/alr2510","title":"Sober Second Thoughts: Litigating Purchase and Sale Agreements in the Energy Industry","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"ConocoPhillips (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Closing (real estate); Compromise; Subject matter; Business; Energy (signal processing); Law; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Economics; Political science; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.026319566844816164,"score_gpt":0.3235116577494944,"score_spread":0.29719209090467824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903346198","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06583956,0.08087815,0.000003483721,0.010070431,0.00031474637,0.0006047819,0.0000039649058,0.000018079361,0.8422668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777675,0.0053357175,0.000012841493,0.012504773,0.0009793241,0.000047651683,0.000002465528,0.0000081466105,0.0033415284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875635,0.0003109135,0.00026424415,0.00018973027,0.00022696765,0.00025178978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993903,0.00021469384,0.00010886036,0.00015787747,0.000055279277,0.00007295691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009166812,0.00009540188,0.00020714181,0.00001121837,0.00043166196,0.0000960757,0.0002345242,0.00010916471,0.0004681892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002804827,0.00006298301,0.000032759603,0.0003153853,0.0003260511,0.00026677412,0.00004674547,0.00015623985,0.000037229685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037551904,0.00008699861,0.003900939,0.0013295892,0.000034918976,0.000011511856,0.023189047,2.5349644e-8,0.000022710568,0.91616356,0.018554498,0.036702428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008295623,0.000022038983,0.000094590374,0.0014976284,0.000014258959,0.0000024678145,0.0005646401,6.318786e-7,0.000028627219,0.0022111768,0.9953867,0.00009428288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11886384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3302187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9768322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019768413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006755781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8870037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903681867","doi":"10.29173/alr2511","title":"Recent Judicial Decisions of Interest to Energy Lawyers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Calgary Laboratory Services","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Judicial opinion; Insolvency; Law; Bankruptcy; Legislation; Arbitration; Creditor; Business; Economics; Political science; Law and economics; Debt; Finance","score_opus":0.0941295086463844,"score_gpt":0.36665933033719056,"score_spread":0.27252982169080614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903681867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019544715,0.041310534,0.000091569826,0.019598633,0.0011692737,0.00048293883,0.0000049562345,0.000028887667,0.93535876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9084648,0.07782356,0.00006934735,0.011232417,0.0009117468,0.0000292452,0.0000028407853,0.00001449882,0.0014515442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987323,0.00016639108,0.00041097167,0.0002113338,0.00022425423,0.0002547254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877214,0.00031776098,0.00013849803,0.00023143491,0.00033939176,0.00020077583],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005397611,0.00009917055,0.00036279377,0.000026250395,0.00030062316,0.00002842856,0.00036795996,0.00006199688,0.0010303078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001710712,0.000081290134,0.00008694303,0.00061186077,0.00029508772,0.00012800348,0.00007886602,0.000047915146,0.00031924024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006363621,0.000030559004,0.000029912611,0.00006857146,0.000014651963,6.449202e-7,0.0007024319,2.7711435e-8,0.000018362804,0.8737833,0.036276538,0.08906867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004571587,0.000076065306,0.000010610311,0.0025720855,0.000028469538,5.4656005e-7,0.000053108415,1.5502863e-7,0.0001185152,0.0023378383,0.99465525,0.00010163119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22384772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63570327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95837873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042971613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001550229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904170329","doi":"10.29173/alr1364","title":"The Law Society of Alberta in the Matter of Conduct of Kenneth Robert Sockett, Q.C.: A Brief Commentary on the Responsibilities and Perversions of Self Governance","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.033322593831416863,"score_gpt":0.2863692248769453,"score_spread":0.2530466310455285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904170329","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19157946,0.21941511,2.1484333e-7,0.3529464,0.00014246195,0.0022450308,0.000053531025,0.00000589056,0.2336119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92629445,0.06017806,0.000009277395,0.012559842,0.000030374074,0.000020059875,0.0000010014337,0.00000696021,0.00089997053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794793,0.0008040683,0.00054458436,0.00015034851,0.00037352345,0.00017956222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940189,0.0050374633,0.0004377123,0.0003827141,0.00009772717,0.000025456478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016656179,0.000114299524,0.00042573805,0.0000039855745,0.00031439375,0.000015464813,0.00047990482,0.000055268247,0.00023583374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028925118,0.000056152636,0.00018269538,0.0002608069,0.0011602051,0.00013284436,0.00007116405,0.0001382232,0.0000031554946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002117921,0.00021589722,0.0026170912,0.0024651557,0.00011217084,2.2126679e-7,0.039708022,4.824327e-7,0.00003537841,0.7360523,0.21843144,0.00034066345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019358975,0.00009329291,0.000658839,0.0029316458,0.00008401478,0.0000012471138,0.002950227,0.000005627384,0.00014711375,0.001047916,0.9917896,0.00009690215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4639902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2001855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77335817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002380167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040092844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.814409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906326474","doi":"10.25071/1705-1436.76","title":"What’s Right Is Right: The Supreme Court Gets It","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Just Labour","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Right to be forgotten; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03514403942566111,"score_gpt":0.30081652285736965,"score_spread":0.2656724834317085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906326474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4977252,0.0049354685,0.000023717575,0.1663245,0.006170006,0.00069489755,0.000032290256,0.00024743428,0.32384652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9107742,0.0018102019,0.000012968529,0.0046421336,0.0019244632,0.000016044478,0.0000013273071,0.000013147995,0.08080555],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982841,0.00013834435,0.00023616663,0.0002452962,0.0006537278,0.00044236754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991712,0.000099375546,0.000114279486,0.0002395149,0.00023344826,0.00014219912],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005725287,0.00013271744,0.00019577723,0.000033790504,0.001971397,0.0002835707,0.0004918804,0.00014208312,0.002343969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011448354,0.00008493162,0.00008755749,0.00030079778,0.00037354795,0.00080857956,0.00004966924,0.00019146313,0.00080163847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019022005,0.00013989123,0.0035321156,0.000062519684,0.00007505492,0.0001788463,0.16998175,0.000003962785,0.000089097084,0.119459614,0.7055705,0.000887614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013871823,0.000017094397,0.0033565387,0.000038378064,0.000013109863,0.000005710808,0.0077313487,0.0000036287604,0.00024256026,0.0027938974,0.98550695,0.00015207061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02229925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0210315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41304898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007253001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032316335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907377067","doi":"","title":"Older Drivers in the News: Killer Headlines v Raising Awareness","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Accident Research Centre, Monash University; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; U.S. Department of Justice; Government of Western Australia; Queensland University of Technology; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; Monash University; University of New South Wales; State Insurance Regulatory Authority; State Government of Victoria; Transport Accident Commission; Australian Government","keywords":"Raising (metalworking); Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Injury prevention; Advertising; Suicide prevention; Occupational safety and health; Project commissioning; Engineering; Internet privacy; Publishing; Medical emergency; Computer security; Psychology; Forensic engineering; Political science; Business; Medicine; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.06993890466540861,"score_gpt":0.37789662896172876,"score_spread":0.3079577242963202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907377067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89323896,0.00070527854,0.00037839278,0.034589596,0.00036381176,0.0008909247,0.000005709105,0.0002186176,0.06960873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99634254,0.00045372537,0.00020961992,0.0000693677,0.00039206396,0.0000020822279,0.0000023318607,0.00001408615,0.0025141833],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99645406,0.00052237016,0.0002967301,0.0005260655,0.0012037911,0.000996962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769264,0.0003358392,0.00014731684,0.0005867656,0.0011083189,0.00012913388],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034114858,0.00018504038,0.00039614743,0.0013706553,0.0019659896,0.000086012784,0.0020458903,0.00048698057,0.00050682086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001094961,0.00016587244,0.00012299878,0.0047409874,0.0051124003,0.0005439933,0.000402561,0.00085391424,0.000084981395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043961743,0.0014077873,0.45159268,0.00029200784,0.00031577403,0.00076641823,0.14825591,0.000022712062,0.0027626453,0.15432034,0.14353907,0.09628502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018083601,0.00044050807,0.013498805,0.0005737288,0.000033211174,0.000009428178,0.23378856,0.000035532707,0.0010388267,0.019302346,0.7290021,0.00046856856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052679908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03816464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58546305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002851888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009482954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W29090523","doi":"","title":"Hiding the Meat of the Patent Bargain: Supreme Court of Canada Voids Viagra Patent for Insufficient Disclosure","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Business; Law; Patent infringement; Patent troll; Patent law; Political science; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.028723383076222596,"score_gpt":0.24574849024043244,"score_spread":0.21702510716420984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W29090523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97994673,0.008847949,0.00065860373,0.006548973,0.0013214815,0.00058021524,0.000018305493,0.000007987446,0.0020697443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982669,0.0005683569,0.0000030190974,0.00006867973,0.000618688,0.000008998137,5.7065006e-7,0.000011680684,0.00045315732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968565,0.00023230047,0.0003982641,0.0000961438,0.0007993984,0.0016173574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989431,0.00012811105,0.00039634298,0.00013898751,0.00029074663,0.000102744234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037036783,0.000113178205,0.00021290276,0.00002504049,0.0009736192,0.000031650954,0.00051510305,0.000060009363,0.000013195029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029028126,0.000058758007,0.00016141681,0.00026410335,0.00014824586,0.00014028809,0.000047089725,0.00051922555,3.3717683e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010996308,0.00035635097,0.10505355,0.00010539284,0.00044942592,5.2086483e-7,0.023164535,0.00033327428,0.0020081585,0.85983354,0.0030430364,0.005542246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041006273,0.0017526741,0.06488513,0.000980571,0.0009023412,0.00013470088,0.36318454,0.00031212132,0.01612481,0.3042142,0.24178924,0.0016190486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31555402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7744832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55561936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089480315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066875163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913114798","doi":"","title":"Legalization Is Only the Start: Canada Must Do Right by Its ‘Cannabis Criminals’","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Cannabis; Criminology; Political science; Computer security; Business; Law; Computer science; Psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.01639693815726617,"score_gpt":0.2786389157213551,"score_spread":0.2622419775640889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913114798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02129401,0.00073097716,0.00016660204,0.09875444,0.0012476852,0.00039774043,0.000056487876,0.000074544805,0.8772775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91359985,0.000034844954,0.0000052244077,0.004938439,0.0009080596,0.000006302965,0.000003832866,0.000008064149,0.08049541],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987092,0.00010042568,0.00018493763,0.00019459373,0.0004995409,0.00031130316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992241,0.000024709268,0.00008556226,0.00013426492,0.0004139293,0.000117384494],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037609175,0.000094818395,0.00011260302,0.000017219154,0.0012788792,0.0002283089,0.00030616435,0.00006616615,0.003971985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014753203,0.000060870505,0.000026353004,0.00035671887,0.00019716409,0.00030631208,0.000026749662,0.00006675995,0.00007928096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027471647,0.000009222882,0.00014649368,0.000006388861,0.000007675057,7.599722e-7,0.005810167,1.557813e-7,0.000028091834,0.028725388,0.96453434,0.0007285511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052748128,0.000023864397,0.0001908042,0.0000107325695,0.000010455514,4.3826165e-7,0.0034838049,0.000009886201,0.0011211294,0.000583499,0.99440193,0.000110691275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9799713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9925387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8923058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014662246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015742211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914700484","doi":"","title":"A Reply on","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.011615090475031595,"score_gpt":0.30005514424973684,"score_spread":0.2884400537747052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914700484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28435844,0.0036073031,0.005825645,0.011575192,0.0013223905,0.00023592086,5.658521e-7,0.00013761023,0.6929369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887289,0.00091247814,0.000010404713,0.00078806916,0.0020073045,4.3200245e-7,1.5249466e-7,0.000008813093,0.0075434446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972035,0.00006869447,0.00019297985,0.00011254709,0.00042199358,0.0020002692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995355,0.000074057185,0.000110951056,0.000070358125,0.00009227709,0.00011688396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066256556,0.00006745969,0.00009696207,0.00007483926,0.0007419435,0.00007811981,0.00020690731,0.000057051777,0.000043570173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029983878,0.000056712423,0.000065083426,0.00024859607,0.00006621128,0.00016298027,0.000008104398,0.0009543692,0.00010012602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039639708,0.000030322262,0.0007359925,0.0000012494738,0.000022696708,0.000007270542,0.0019713787,9.87131e-7,0.000034071174,0.9633126,0.00064813683,0.03319564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026156328,0.00029874366,0.0004459225,0.000024156865,0.000008787905,0.000047338603,0.017506596,4.3250188e-7,0.00007613168,0.43428972,0.54690135,0.00013923668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054145795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02677076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70437044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008643677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002336083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99098814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915677960","doi":"10.36641/mjgl.25.2.strange","title":"The Strange Pairing: Building Alliances Between Queer Activists and Conservative Groups to Recognize New Families","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Journal of Gender & Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Operationalization; Normative; Political science; Family law; Power (physics); Politics; Dissent; Law; Criticism; Sociology; Law and economics; Gender studies","score_opus":0.06771112213284422,"score_gpt":0.33837304921252676,"score_spread":0.2706619270796825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915677960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.979934,0.0014808809,0.0014686816,0.0059502586,0.00052801525,0.00016693749,0.0000035343405,0.000018276882,0.01044943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956166,0.00020521243,0.0006804435,0.0005659633,0.0025998976,0.0000011245589,1.3107167e-7,0.000011920157,0.00031872178],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859446,0.0001921589,0.00035255254,0.00015296206,0.0003935373,0.00031434797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987113,0.00033686438,0.0002796895,0.000079860896,0.0003181285,0.00027419085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001247146,0.0001237844,0.00025482543,0.000038652128,0.0010226641,0.0003032384,0.00031859768,0.00006552934,0.00001558731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021010265,0.00008499619,0.00006290377,0.00022352407,0.00049634726,0.00043053186,0.000040436837,0.00017093969,0.000006088598],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004593157,0.000071518414,0.10875554,0.00011139747,0.0010329282,0.000044117456,0.6733438,0.000003963321,0.0064925193,0.12702861,0.014442689,0.06821362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068728824,0.00054285245,0.049713254,0.00032238758,0.00010663414,0.000015559657,0.067001775,0.0000012755827,0.004496177,0.05475814,0.8219496,0.00040506467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004031099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022301191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8075069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003266727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026482437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99553925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916970689","doi":"","title":"The Attorney General's Standing to Seek Relief in the Public Interest: The Evolving Doctrine of Parens Patriae","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Supreme court; Public interest; Context (archaeology); Political science; History","score_opus":0.07240285337715215,"score_gpt":0.3456311690745672,"score_spread":0.27322831569741507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916970689","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029765403,0.29365572,0.000035876496,0.5734663,0.0010547136,0.003571665,0.000031237774,0.000033153752,0.098385915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763929,0.016679885,0.00000531529,0.0059686145,0.0005173764,0.000030930478,0.0000011622774,0.000009786962,0.00039398516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766105,0.00071668066,0.00047302747,0.00015509732,0.00040294038,0.00059118186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983165,0.0006614984,0.00017588849,0.0004451735,0.00017477776,0.00022613343],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012139684,0.000116525785,0.00024085917,0.000056722074,0.0015238518,0.0002621738,0.0012650517,0.000048106773,0.000094712006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022239867,0.000048728343,0.00009409994,0.0011493276,0.0002327667,0.00011804068,0.000050303093,0.00026160065,0.000036616522],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066231974,0.0000117926365,0.004051,0.0002976361,0.000038519593,0.000022004253,0.01511014,0.0000015506552,0.000007979859,0.8382733,0.100602396,0.041577064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004316324,0.000018065008,0.0016310952,0.0006996465,0.000019151541,0.0000028544323,0.0022748243,0.0000016639501,0.0000015577824,0.0010991602,0.994129,0.00007981489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4595474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97958624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94662756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039723955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092716375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918249602","doi":"10.70658/4486-1457.1451","title":"Social Enterprise Law in Action: Organizational Characteristics of U.S. Benefit Corporations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Toronto Mississauga; University of Denver","keywords":"Corporation; Shareholder; Corporate law; Legislation; Statute; Limited liability; Business; Politics; Law and economics; Corporate governance; Law; Economics; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.02400868845019108,"score_gpt":0.2948512677926852,"score_spread":0.2708425793424941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918249602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7836701,0.00007465654,0.00025742175,0.002782136,0.0013341422,0.0004103102,0.000090823865,0.00012062346,0.21125975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995945,0.000015354864,0.00008073161,0.00042262598,0.0022726539,0.000009815097,0.000024600358,0.000012400025,0.0012168479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988387,0.0000706977,0.0003449783,0.00017510411,0.00036335466,0.00020714209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991013,0.000043064258,0.00021203527,0.000094495605,0.00045405317,0.00009504527],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003046461,0.00008983385,0.00019515408,0.000041439616,0.0007282327,0.00010391991,0.00019098991,0.00013014258,0.00097093027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000144394,0.00009694405,0.000039260423,0.00048437965,0.00048662745,0.00042994507,0.00003791221,0.00012103548,0.00016648025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017668568,0.000078549114,0.018585142,0.00001744263,0.0000097932025,0.0000016122904,0.0026951781,4.4301973e-7,0.00037781772,0.97727674,0.000710198,0.00022939814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011390958,0.00019702653,0.1154117,0.00018582471,0.000050647322,0.000002888493,0.0029618253,0.000022117638,0.0024636637,0.10547525,0.77142,0.00066994573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02313154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10331401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8718015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010953036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024906124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W29320652","doi":"","title":"Comparative Perspectives on Lawyer Regulation: An Agenda for Reform in the United States and Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law reform; Law; Regulatory reform; Public administration; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04000465346090345,"score_gpt":0.3178044839275043,"score_spread":0.2777998304666009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W29320652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.944041,0.0005130212,0.000011431574,0.002766951,0.00018527484,0.00046696552,0.000027940192,0.00002213475,0.051965255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979527,0.000030185065,0.0000384142,0.00095751166,0.00050430733,0.00003796204,0.000021225123,0.00000555685,0.000452138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900806,0.00019124651,0.00013036,0.00014018544,0.00026100618,0.0002691141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994393,0.00017287306,0.00006259979,0.00010678911,0.00010610774,0.00011232098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068736845,0.00008503905,0.00013434682,0.000028540395,0.00063587684,0.00010949557,0.00013767717,0.000045327244,0.000044484794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000067391804,0.00005855789,0.00001569989,0.00021214207,0.00015098313,0.00045479118,0.000010334863,0.00010578021,0.0000034485938],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046026962,0.000069589805,0.0042546126,0.000015070964,0.0000142945355,9.127781e-7,0.105772614,0.000030941857,0.00001084172,0.8859599,0.0037563606,0.00006883398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003104833,0.000093809474,0.018628787,0.000031864398,0.0000088246525,6.636426e-7,0.30375856,0.00004140553,0.000101014746,0.0032192464,0.6736326,0.00017272454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9748507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98554957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8827407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030346852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017219145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4890715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2938388826","doi":"10.1089/glr2.2019.2351","title":"CONNECTICUT GAMING DEAL BACK ON","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"WiLAN (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.032635087150380125,"score_gpt":0.3260474541890375,"score_spread":0.2934123670386574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2938388826","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010471232,0.046281356,0.00001793328,0.0023849404,0.0006884576,0.00078152784,0.000002358173,0.00009705408,0.93927515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815745,0.008625622,0.00007425525,0.005932419,0.0004505212,0.0000121038065,0.0000026163716,0.000018656452,0.0033093481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867296,0.00018008429,0.0002588801,0.00024112804,0.00033792146,0.00030902683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932754,0.00017893231,0.00013256892,0.00018244945,0.000079733974,0.00009879871],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009487176,0.00011116965,0.0003393968,0.000015937818,0.00029326286,0.00007810346,0.00021685919,0.000066081746,0.001211553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018209084,0.0000941142,0.000092755115,0.00023337381,0.000079221114,0.00019492002,0.000029759514,0.00012261781,0.0042768246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047742565,0.000040043567,0.00043533006,0.0039033468,0.00002436727,0.000007917692,0.0015748746,0.000001069717,0.00004346489,0.95068735,0.007576731,0.035700753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008288872,0.000036908797,0.00004102301,0.00502058,0.00001759534,0.0000016792527,0.0001738725,0.0000013049928,0.000027383778,0.0003536923,0.9941001,0.00014298403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067834556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013677404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98652333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007068395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007649619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943030016","doi":"10.14264/uql.2019.267","title":"The governance of hydraulic fracturing in unconventional resources: the elements, form and effectiveness of the regulations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"The University of Queensland","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hydraulic fracturing; Legislation; Resource (disambiguation); Jurisdiction; Business; Corporate governance; Lease; Process (computing); Environmental planning; Engineering; Political science; Law; Geography; Petroleum engineering; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.006950601032907184,"score_gpt":0.23184428594038828,"score_spread":0.2248936849074811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943030016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9825907,0.00079610007,0.0000051572565,0.0004888655,0.00013669659,0.00045079575,0.000020500971,0.000002321754,0.015508893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969969,0.0002856959,0.0000014544175,0.000003867039,0.000024383244,4.7567434e-7,0.0000047955987,0.000003269379,0.0026792055],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990425,0.000305789,0.00014588433,0.00008791213,0.00032680534,0.000091096896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856305,0.0006739966,0.00049278897,0.00015477139,0.00010526833,0.000010125915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010546439,0.00006426015,0.00015596458,0.000016509179,0.00060448033,0.000011705111,0.00040869237,0.00007455813,0.000010631757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009326923,0.000033529872,0.00007069143,0.0001678556,0.00035367967,0.000073387244,0.00004360545,0.00013133675,4.7127756e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019833872,0.00018679327,0.38611358,0.003031115,0.00069537293,0.000002397512,0.3398157,0.0008964957,0.0006040424,0.25885513,0.0010354955,0.0067804684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037477017,0.00002290168,0.94355315,0.0008445158,0.00006568337,1.8352475e-7,0.027822811,0.000024957928,0.00020455965,0.0061590937,0.020858992,0.00006837737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040674638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06619694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55743957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044998153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015163646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9657136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943469719","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1338","title":"R v Smith and Judicially Reviewing the Scope of Criminal Law under the Charter","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Law; Possession (linguistics); Charter; Political science; Criminal law; Authorization; Criminal procedure; Scope (computer science); Philosophy; Computer security","score_opus":0.05240966874915045,"score_gpt":0.3235476951893797,"score_spread":0.2711380264402293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943469719","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007594189,0.72401553,0.00010541254,0.06457222,0.00033786113,0.0012239317,0.000008736569,0.0000359439,0.20894097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6733408,0.31674722,0.000014070202,0.008989389,0.00046656543,0.000035772686,3.0794757e-7,0.00001257929,0.00039326385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981567,0.00047710733,0.00042161302,0.00020413368,0.000463536,0.00027689838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887305,0.00029055437,0.00022102491,0.00030821477,0.00023367847,0.00007345296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028452158,0.00013153059,0.00040567786,0.0000075731264,0.00072866114,0.000067546636,0.0004269822,0.000049777685,0.00023673223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019071813,0.000053391308,0.00011149493,0.00018172675,0.001023805,0.00027538455,0.00007668713,0.00009877023,0.000050528222],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030946949,0.000011478696,0.000032898428,0.0014432011,0.000025577196,8.746105e-7,0.0005965421,2.0021485e-8,0.00008627434,0.97805566,0.0045473385,0.015197023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008298133,0.000026089596,0.00011430843,0.010372499,0.00015796663,0.0000028015052,0.00017629834,7.1951355e-8,0.000057373032,0.004599152,0.9843047,0.00010570329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076980623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068363785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9797574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029751247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018020596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943917422","doi":"","title":"The Ship is Not the Only Vessel on the River: Revisiting First Nations' Mobility Rights under Article III of the 1794 Jay Treaty","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Damages; Tort; Harm; Law; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Political science; Treaty; Causation; Liability; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.025309398463645782,"score_gpt":0.30756244866963506,"score_spread":0.2822530502059893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943917422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22287574,0.107620284,0.0000044828166,0.06264639,0.0008652193,0.0039739264,0.000051567484,0.0000453187,0.6019171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980674,0.01744775,7.091129e-7,0.0014677349,0.00016463565,0.000027245866,8.7940873e-7,0.0000058222,0.00021118805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815524,0.00031526317,0.0005016369,0.0001997795,0.00058591017,0.00024218475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980725,0.00075759075,0.0004289838,0.0004930134,0.0001988608,0.000049022747],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025548814,0.00013615272,0.00030203132,0.000007130874,0.002260917,0.000071858085,0.00053837243,0.000047537065,0.00004560425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011345307,0.000046770827,0.000185201,0.00034547065,0.0009476405,0.00017853845,0.00009263916,0.00020738629,0.000016020154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007705022,0.000034929504,0.00020354657,0.0009869721,0.000019327459,2.6879814e-8,0.0016156841,3.717687e-7,0.0000018996909,0.99318063,0.00019362813,0.0037552973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016814927,0.00003673619,0.0014943043,0.0052560903,0.00006326629,6.12103e-7,0.00059728406,0.000007817181,0.0002023652,0.012571323,0.97950053,0.0001015459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015216909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016165754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9806093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007753642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010082351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944998944","doi":"","title":"Dewey Ranch and the Role of the Bankruptcy Court in Decisions Relating to the Permissible Control of National Sports Leagues Over Individual Franchise Owners","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; League; Phoenix; Franchise; Law; Relocation; Section (typography); Business; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Advertising; Marketing; History","score_opus":0.02419912512742232,"score_gpt":0.2746869947154551,"score_spread":0.25048786958803276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944998944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8042761,0.0009993579,0.00009337417,0.002075122,0.00016906994,0.0006770946,0.000015318437,0.000010525897,0.19168404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992182,0.000027808615,0.000058473383,0.0002888364,0.00009339648,0.000011127035,2.2939467e-7,0.0000044068515,0.00029750442],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848866,0.0001914978,0.00032705948,0.000118286574,0.00072593335,0.00014855349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887437,0.00063335506,0.00017762152,0.000110333174,0.00016121661,0.000043123742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024184356,0.0000683976,0.0001799255,0.000042395764,0.0003892904,0.000027357692,0.00031425842,0.0000623299,0.0001754154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013398423,0.000029208293,0.000059488288,0.00035719652,0.00036280026,0.0001481938,0.000058865022,0.00012173369,0.0000013752174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001376627,0.000075291675,0.6282239,0.0000072394205,0.000043045726,4.2295056e-7,0.15138243,0.00009207625,0.000056633096,0.2103587,0.0011200288,0.008502592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019605362,0.000035743302,0.8819162,0.00019068264,0.000043317305,0.000001186565,0.036043983,0.00027891446,0.00022646475,0.05997029,0.019172939,0.00015973169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027558006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010699363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25369233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016196858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025200503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97891754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946304970","doi":"","title":"Mapping Territorial Limitations on Insurance Coverage","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital USD (University of San Diego)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Business; Liability; International trade; Economics; Finance; Market economy","score_opus":0.03350818900713962,"score_gpt":0.23772586878507437,"score_spread":0.20421767977793476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946304970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53714263,0.000016692493,0.0003374848,0.00025926935,0.00061001914,0.000090856665,0.000053300093,0.00004666195,0.4614431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972181,0.000014597671,0.000026909469,0.000037063575,0.00080446067,1.0741892e-7,0.0000087728695,0.00000428779,0.001885755],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931395,0.000024568806,0.00007680832,0.00014857766,0.00026887067,0.00016723482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948996,0.000095130104,0.000090217596,0.00008787485,0.00015685354,0.00007995076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008884841,0.00006339775,0.00012162518,0.00007251034,0.0005944512,0.00008153741,0.0002180121,0.00006441929,0.00009594025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015405958,0.00007721911,0.00006173068,0.0002960383,0.0004173015,0.0008384335,0.00004022953,0.000058261467,0.00013513408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062658935,0.0009826587,0.09149959,0.00020917194,0.0002817714,0.00009542888,0.33405948,0.00002172317,0.0010177372,0.25244045,0.08876183,0.23000357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058445585,0.00026031007,0.051623635,0.00013260652,0.000007740027,3.7114015e-7,0.027814098,0.000008046405,0.000035914127,0.005937628,0.9133483,0.00024688512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036518998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068486785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82458645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055135464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010543784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5520604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947492467","doi":"10.7202/1059255ar","title":"Death Bed Marriages in the Commonwealth Caribbean","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Geography; Ethnology; Genealogy; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01951997130616902,"score_gpt":0.2793692158514105,"score_spread":0.2598492445452415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947492467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7252508,0.0002117113,0.000007974612,0.00383358,0.0002167503,0.00041139752,0.000005741509,0.00003689861,0.27002513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974242,0.00010298689,0.000029205721,0.0005892944,0.00052776915,0.000022600985,0.0000043142245,0.00001013615,0.0012895012],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987291,0.00026404415,0.00019736025,0.00017748747,0.0002384009,0.00039358492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993852,0.00019120151,0.000086302185,0.00022548925,0.000036334717,0.00007551716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014156746,0.00006552072,0.00019609799,0.0000470819,0.0002215237,0.000110447894,0.0004537763,0.00010078265,0.000088653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001344716,0.00006968113,0.000059602706,0.0003338786,0.00005524337,0.00015985571,0.000026775184,0.00020358367,0.00016142007],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014540335,0.000070394686,0.5807825,0.00015173938,0.000011492028,0.000038174974,0.033363517,0.000019215306,0.00007116212,0.38219938,0.0017748403,0.0015030485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014157206,0.00027090296,0.4106808,0.0006044273,0.000053098225,0.000034103432,0.0409896,0.00016947527,0.00015465816,0.23352167,0.3112,0.00090554083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04013375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022683028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30942515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017580726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017178756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99515045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953111865","doi":"","title":"The Emerging Presence of Mexican Law in California Courts","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital USD (University of San Diego)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.011799568202224671,"score_gpt":0.2339182678745312,"score_spread":0.22211869967230655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953111865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66121674,0.0002895076,0.000057921665,0.0013415802,0.000058466183,0.00013170033,0.000043135864,0.000021000867,0.33683994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990579,0.000044233166,0.000017435867,0.000015272652,0.00004543486,9.262439e-8,0.0000019603845,0.000002689893,0.000815017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931663,0.000028932227,0.00010635741,0.00010173592,0.00026780812,0.00017855296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995594,0.00010509944,0.0001089668,0.000086638895,0.00008142681,0.00005843681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021447746,0.000049797556,0.00012453987,0.000033165885,0.00034231768,0.000036339363,0.0003045935,0.000039542818,0.00005572725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007048255,0.000047432728,0.000050055725,0.0002071109,0.00058828056,0.0005941783,0.000067941,0.0000582233,0.000012822363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000209408,0.00042110114,0.060356304,0.000166212,0.000101831836,0.000037551228,0.104791954,0.00026385314,0.000337747,0.70227045,0.008989163,0.12205443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004310166,0.000058066707,0.00826005,0.00014006374,0.00001558616,5.355983e-7,0.07164531,0.00017348117,0.00012680418,0.007140134,0.91179264,0.00021631998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027044587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11820648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9028035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042466723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000077758385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97943443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953283758","doi":"10.82308/7073","title":"Abuse of intellectual property rights in the US and Canada comparing theories of social obligations and abuse of rights","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Law; Political science; Reservation of rights; Intellectual property; Statutory law; Fundamental rights; Right to property; Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01662398767493088,"score_gpt":0.23532386354866777,"score_spread":0.2186998758737369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953283758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9417602,0.0000782124,2.7808312e-7,0.00005793003,0.00009837298,0.00029055306,0.00009771465,0.000011629634,0.05760513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996738,0.000052489908,0.0000198218,0.00002793723,0.000029790503,0.000012354295,0.0000010912311,0.000007616837,0.00017509871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980313,0.00044745032,0.0005143988,0.00023467114,0.00051084685,0.00026131497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849343,0.00071274803,0.0002903728,0.00014297501,0.00028140115,0.000079087455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001030887,0.000148802,0.00039213596,0.00009186087,0.0009914929,0.000026504254,0.0003178741,0.00011211495,0.000020302212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004761612,0.00007735398,0.000043596465,0.00037353,0.0007678301,0.0004776594,0.00004579237,0.00016751219,9.940677e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006453216,0.000114635004,0.003168083,0.00009198793,0.000048412458,0.000002586263,0.004518704,0.0000011420677,0.003665655,0.9870912,0.000012676271,0.0012204134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003687579,0.00037095902,0.033677485,0.0015180755,0.00021353338,0.000015938967,0.012378874,0.000014420394,0.10823871,0.5071943,0.3314591,0.0012310417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80951834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9433237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4798969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012133781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012501799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7625862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954974037","doi":"10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1297","title":"North American and Australian LGBT Movement and Interest Groups","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social movement; Movement (music); Gender studies; Political science; Identity (music); Sociology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.07421144016963192,"score_gpt":0.3780513985747297,"score_spread":0.30383995840509775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954974037","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16834255,0.0016387419,0.0000026703754,0.0013771253,0.0007316604,0.00078482926,0.00038201973,0.00002770412,0.8267127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26979408,0.52190906,0.000079795325,0.00009369236,0.0026873797,0.000043317577,0.000079338024,0.00005221665,0.20526114],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99599075,0.00047639944,0.0005277834,0.0005218801,0.00130231,0.0011808914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759394,0.0006618127,0.00028997046,0.0003245005,0.00052647805,0.000603296],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010735878,0.00028696258,0.0007026813,0.00037665843,0.0004767305,0.00020218095,0.0005231816,0.0002743785,0.00006278568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009310363,0.00025580003,0.00007328039,0.0005598367,0.0021973513,0.00019632187,0.00042410978,0.0010275586,0.000012274457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059854327,0.00048781626,0.19368805,0.008193911,0.0004054056,0.00008891522,0.02149558,5.0612374e-7,8.3194897e-7,0.25629255,0.2695819,0.24970469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016445018,0.00035242445,0.010507956,0.0004395905,0.00003009906,9.882353e-7,0.006142265,9.2073964e-7,0.0000014227239,0.0043195486,0.9777622,0.0002781105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06923758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052068863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7081803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002494459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013851464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955425684","doi":"","title":"Repeal the Jones Act for American Energy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; Port (circuit theory); Oil refinery; Oil boom; Business; Boom; Commerce; International trade; Government (linguistics); Petroleum industry; Downstream (manufacturing); Economic shortage; Economy; Economics; Engineering; Law; Marketing; Waste management; Political science","score_opus":0.039446651221369075,"score_gpt":0.3286791863043932,"score_spread":0.2892325350830241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955425684","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17452021,0.00035507185,0.033621475,0.015674084,0.0015576391,0.00080961204,0.00022129339,0.0003211102,0.7729195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95611703,0.000058913545,0.0022536048,0.00015801545,0.00074874616,0.0000023172574,0.0000027951621,0.00001825365,0.040640302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983207,0.00066171284,0.00011403951,0.00028994368,0.00027413404,0.0003394421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985361,0.00027313258,0.0003498632,0.00049285335,0.00020476541,0.000143247],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002024649,0.00012059768,0.00021553117,0.00006960026,0.00679106,0.00051688065,0.0012105424,0.00008229934,0.000044606204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015335049,0.00009648897,0.000166542,0.00022518572,0.000842027,0.00052316097,0.00012568991,0.0001986512,0.000022884842],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003987302,0.00010448177,0.024198014,0.000039246595,0.0002389431,0.000049464285,0.03417862,0.000006381456,0.0007818671,0.69333524,0.0020289493,0.24464007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002352121,0.00003308685,0.0011781229,0.000012578759,0.00004728987,3.6094747e-7,0.03572973,0.0000043099185,0.000099014826,0.0027480782,0.9597551,0.00015708341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06542133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024280613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9577262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008041964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023464374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99450195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963512296","doi":"10.29173/alr2548","title":"After the Hammer: Six Years of Meads v. Meads","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Pedagogy; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.012744714712181722,"score_gpt":0.28665101674335247,"score_spread":0.2739063020311707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963512296","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044146456,0.18291426,0.0000013024352,0.0103693865,0.00071290863,0.0012877072,0.0000035420032,0.000022704631,0.76054174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97641444,0.013869771,0.0000064329192,0.0034315411,0.00016569518,0.000036763224,0.0000010369208,0.0000104753035,0.0060638324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987614,0.00020034697,0.0002983276,0.00016369688,0.00035927232,0.0002169474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999091,0.00030820546,0.0001457491,0.00030539522,0.00009008782,0.000059506398],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081529916,0.00008513854,0.00032817305,0.000008750808,0.00009758404,0.000033061293,0.00034860746,0.000059224567,0.0012995133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024899645,0.000056789646,0.00013725767,0.0002856386,0.00019365975,0.00017531028,0.000046479243,0.00008750438,0.0009256668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016837748,0.000057450954,0.0056532384,0.0027493539,0.00008258832,0.00000279033,0.0052993377,3.9889449e-7,0.000043482505,0.94826394,0.011631136,0.026199445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054002798,0.000018809418,0.00042713544,0.0012692178,0.000043227148,6.718218e-7,0.000058348647,2.386441e-7,0.000013489915,0.0003878592,0.99764067,0.00008634903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13776065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06464151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98600954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019706698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000091225294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963561557","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Canadian Law: Constitution and Charter of Rights","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Charter; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02381715427103188,"score_gpt":0.2810135466251489,"score_spread":0.257196392354117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963561557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024901333,0.00402791,0.000005999894,0.00085118646,0.0016530413,0.0002837613,0.000093806295,0.000040510044,0.99279475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96469116,0.00037960787,0.000045776927,0.0005750821,0.0025663185,0.000010021112,0.00003485776,0.000009560037,0.031687643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998727,0.00008052664,0.00030722705,0.00018881437,0.00030270242,0.0003937114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990863,0.000065928325,0.0001583559,0.00011788918,0.0001933083,0.0003781681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048705106,0.00014956262,0.0003440512,0.00012266652,0.0006003112,0.00009323564,0.00017423554,0.0004486947,0.00088969985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006349531,0.00012083949,0.000052282976,0.00012186793,0.00085431867,0.0003519905,0.000020081836,0.000143278,0.000055056233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010345162,0.0000066313673,0.00019975941,0.00008681781,0.000023132932,0.0000021598719,0.0023148926,1.9947207e-8,0.0000019944623,0.846698,0.15036413,0.00030145716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057292844,0.0000118678045,0.000035906687,0.00016670313,0.000032813696,0.0000012589569,0.0004098402,1.9612419e-7,0.000030752133,0.006858091,0.99222904,0.00016625004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99397236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98571223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96444213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010612604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011588767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9741589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969647344","doi":"","title":"Freedom of Disposition v. Duty of Support: What's a Child Worth?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disposition; Duty; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.0071184082202724866,"score_gpt":0.2567437064569111,"score_spread":0.2496252982366386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969647344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5102306,0.0002700158,0.00007827942,0.0010130658,0.00056263217,0.00029318218,0.0000054799143,0.000029539264,0.48751718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99760395,0.00009721917,0.000035021647,0.00005761629,0.00015343768,0.0000023106456,0.0000030582464,0.000004091383,0.0020433117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919087,0.00004085877,0.00022328539,0.00010644417,0.00030535515,0.0001331933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954396,0.000037452235,0.00014623175,0.000105151325,0.00011955651,0.000047625206],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031986006,0.000049983326,0.00017578347,0.000036179124,0.000073951254,0.000040224248,0.00013146982,0.00006462165,0.001513171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036883463,0.000041214644,0.00006193009,0.00022215689,0.00011716997,0.0006738258,0.000021162472,0.00004354193,0.000052968055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011187188,0.0004889002,0.1475809,0.00053821853,0.00010249117,0.0000030639246,0.041991822,0.00004469549,0.003795572,0.78505737,0.0038586983,0.016426401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048665837,0.002476013,0.26467597,0.003474366,0.00025433663,0.000008141945,0.20993407,0.00016885548,0.037737254,0.028224895,0.4461247,0.0020547882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022809103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060249097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7568325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014047747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009374621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977144259","doi":"10.7202/1064941ar","title":"Is Genetic Discrimination Back on the Radar? A Commentary on the Recent Court of Appeal Reference Decision on the Genetic Non-Discrimination Act (GNDA)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Bioethics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Université de Montréal; Génome Québec; Genome Canada","keywords":"Appeal; Genetic discrimination; Opposition (politics); Law; Political science; Closing (real estate); Government (linguistics); Criminology; Sociology; Genetic testing; Politics; Genetics; Biology","score_opus":0.09335878304915689,"score_gpt":0.33277665070631796,"score_spread":0.23941786765716105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977144259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5772472,0.0002543155,0.000099907666,0.40539312,0.0009635951,0.00063557527,0.000038258888,0.0000027525816,0.015365268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98633707,0.0006906187,0.00004736059,0.012481916,0.00032300083,0.0000031932125,0.0000019738886,0.000012759326,0.00010211848],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975666,0.00055715366,0.00043733968,0.00015695492,0.0010004182,0.00028157159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971797,0.001312922,0.00051424437,0.00029804834,0.0004930559,0.00020204697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023863637,0.00014331094,0.00019222384,0.00014401026,0.0008556158,0.00016386832,0.0007390447,0.00016525779,0.00045383617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006693177,0.00007270446,0.00009293383,0.00037998916,0.0005579936,0.00009611812,0.000019203177,0.00071397476,0.000060399212],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005490543,0.0003195944,0.008878098,0.00020971919,0.00027091877,0.00004055973,0.15694985,0.00049867196,0.00078176626,0.22829345,0.46169394,0.14151438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014349137,0.0043497407,0.09836672,0.0052539995,0.00026253817,0.000020692944,0.10612295,0.0006644594,0.005972085,0.050652023,0.7259864,0.00091345044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036027037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.109746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40908983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003549077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013268791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97039217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978221471","doi":"10.5840/cpsem200619","title":"Disabling the Normative Because \"She Can Afford To\"","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Semiotics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.027264173748833435,"score_gpt":0.28460597307565455,"score_spread":0.2573417993268211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978221471","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026873813,0.00031837416,0.00007950645,0.0057899314,0.00080722687,0.00050827814,0.00007156549,0.000081242746,0.99207515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26192623,0.0002060159,0.000029000352,0.0016333276,0.002970371,0.000006048259,0.00002326042,0.00005074559,0.733155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835515,0.000038888556,0.000335789,0.00024297654,0.00064707606,0.00038014795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886423,0.00026350602,0.00022981188,0.0002624298,0.0002214755,0.00015855875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004999646,0.00023987902,0.0003189776,0.0000614591,0.00089072256,0.00022367817,0.00049459346,0.00031008822,0.0001560154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002752157,0.00017473026,0.000117735995,0.00010819358,0.0003011717,0.000092325514,0.00010738957,0.0002955914,0.00045070675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011899973,0.000018277578,0.000078837336,0.0000900162,0.00009308816,0.00002148104,0.028535742,0.00020937437,0.000005313352,0.7778343,0.190186,0.0029156876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043153254,0.000034351866,0.000006185252,0.00022192798,0.000052559917,8.689099e-7,0.0011969076,0.0000022934425,0.00002199378,0.04872044,0.9494326,0.00026673125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024647636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049664084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7592466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024197742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044292922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98184735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978444439","doi":"10.29173/alr2568","title":"Is that All There Is? The Dubious Dividends of Daniels","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Connaught Fund; University of Toronto","keywords":"Dividend; Economics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Finance","score_opus":0.044039202841768266,"score_gpt":0.33135573181480504,"score_spread":0.2873165289730368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978444439","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075278953,0.18958464,9.430166e-7,0.03615061,0.00034396988,0.0008839499,0.0000057576567,0.000016297796,0.76548594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91909367,0.04885134,0.000002201982,0.01853407,0.00012663526,0.000016657472,0.000001254071,0.000011437713,0.0133627355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998683,0.00018529716,0.00027441117,0.00020323378,0.00041118398,0.00024289191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988598,0.00038180713,0.00022626655,0.00038806564,0.000082143386,0.00006189161],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072989915,0.000116221476,0.00037575883,0.0000070529613,0.00018361956,0.00005623622,0.00054734666,0.000071829374,0.0026378387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000110617046,0.00006767342,0.00017579837,0.0002155439,0.00016477394,0.00022815503,0.00006796632,0.00009479164,0.00072826823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003997591,0.000075617776,0.011678463,0.0043319725,0.00020641535,0.0000020468237,0.018781424,1.07604926e-7,0.000038750804,0.8405587,0.112632506,0.011690015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055570177,0.000020937996,0.00014611318,0.0017199097,0.00006229215,8.932006e-7,0.00017935173,3.3255782e-7,0.00008665257,0.001188868,0.99643725,0.00010185541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18897696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026167458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9115658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018137036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007614799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978848097","doi":"10.1163/2211906x-00802005","title":"The Thought of Samuel J. Levine at the Intersection of the Talmudic and Constitutional Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Torah; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Judaism; Constitution; Narrative; Talmud; Constitutional law; Sociology; Constitutional interpretation; Philosophy; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.022699139442951943,"score_gpt":0.32111341021611084,"score_spread":0.2984142707731589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978848097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72846466,0.0032209614,0.00015627078,0.0022821333,0.0010754521,0.00022018711,0.000022202037,0.0000025982026,0.26455554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993996,0.00004590472,0.000007393686,0.00013072875,0.0001720627,6.270081e-7,1.5775052e-7,9.5253944e-7,0.00024256381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879426,0.00027885905,0.0003262376,0.00005726734,0.00043856679,0.000104810846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873084,0.00022717583,0.000544947,0.00007849582,0.00038399914,0.000034530385],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069757475,0.000063475316,0.00020835073,0.000004923026,0.0005504849,0.000042220807,0.00026563543,0.000033745288,0.00003192045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033344335,0.00002772616,0.000096526746,0.00018009501,0.0045110076,0.0001874648,0.00006671945,0.00011110159,0.0000038896023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008405389,0.000016835225,0.004232502,0.000007154231,0.00005412216,2.7390539e-7,0.00094530446,0.000051210285,0.00028017096,0.99301195,0.0012447948,0.00007162397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001271173,0.00041639156,0.018836131,0.0004964207,0.00011466862,0.00012862713,0.014152184,0.000026975013,0.0040208795,0.124856465,0.8355026,0.00017748751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001590403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0093724765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8681555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010170632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019529993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99819815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980960846","doi":"","title":"SENIORS ON THE STAND: ACCOMMODATING OLDER WITNESSES IN ADVERSARIAL TRIALS","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Witness; Psychology; Cognition; Cross-examination; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.06516766666459298,"score_gpt":0.3504715508136412,"score_spread":0.28530388414904817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980960846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0655335,0.09409259,0.0000027890817,0.34484708,0.0025053392,0.008002297,0.000059643993,0.000064505984,0.48489225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98630726,0.0063126297,0.0000018313848,0.0058484604,0.00048409437,0.0000405516,0.0000017499294,0.00001098791,0.000992438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974117,0.0013764754,0.0003779836,0.00015774056,0.0003300801,0.00034596698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845177,0.00088786264,0.00018174977,0.00027742784,0.00006351227,0.00013769478],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008040998,0.00010784596,0.00042910548,0.000040558833,0.00059099303,0.00012824559,0.0004972793,0.000063969004,0.0016922464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027584652,0.000055509354,0.0000935655,0.00045241546,0.00010491344,0.00012943026,0.000018696122,0.00020946182,0.00038456157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029872279,0.00003045649,0.0040367497,0.0017313876,0.00009316303,0.000019806956,0.018617244,0.0000261719,0.000009694724,0.82525194,0.09847184,0.051681656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015890707,0.000011977921,0.0004006424,0.0028950006,0.000026067675,4.770092e-7,0.001407429,0.0000017160188,0.000003367859,0.0010129422,0.9939653,0.00011616605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6560168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82332027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92077374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027141225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016112995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2985415371","doi":"10.5703/1288284317057","title":"Transfer Turns Ten: The Future of the Code","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Purdue Pharma (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Metadata; Intermediary; World Wide Web; Code (set theory); Service (business); Publishing; Terminology; Session (web analytics); Point (geometry); Library science; Telecommunications; Business; Political science; Law; Set (abstract data type); Marketing","score_opus":0.009280923608627594,"score_gpt":0.2556000762844916,"score_spread":0.24631915267586402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2985415371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34561092,0.0008115494,0.000020536696,0.036431197,0.0013754896,0.0004294116,0.000005731345,0.000029609948,0.6152856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860023,0.000049625418,0.0000022436889,0.000749716,0.00051249424,0.0000025199522,9.0341544e-8,0.0000030263757,0.012677962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938005,0.00007759825,0.00009315197,0.000068774396,0.00026548072,0.00011493307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997248,0.0000490812,0.000019122961,0.00012923575,0.000057048383,0.000020725813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003157139,0.000039022805,0.00007613686,0.0000053674194,0.0001718082,0.000027038655,0.00032477468,0.000052373987,0.000594001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013904611,0.000015510088,0.00006311198,0.00019496933,0.000117365504,0.000102751605,0.00001350986,0.000077151126,0.000042080483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007993281,0.000026660107,0.013929098,0.000041586947,0.000020083979,1.6274184e-7,0.036544938,0.000007436333,0.0009890569,0.9384203,0.00795789,0.0020548196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008176094,0.000011928761,0.004249636,0.000012636785,0.000006736158,1.9436102e-7,0.016916953,0.0000023975,0.00059206184,0.0026637313,0.97541547,0.000046482488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064163753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02154316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9674576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009424117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010864298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989946791","doi":"10.4324/9780429029813-15","title":"Privacy in North America","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.025005861697003844,"score_gpt":0.2749559333054913,"score_spread":0.24995007160848745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989946791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012653226,0.00039270258,0.00001106938,0.0006040979,0.00035459676,0.00032720598,0.0000063990133,0.000057500885,0.9981199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0739306,0.00047905123,0.000022888082,0.00036882565,0.00055968115,0.0000030249016,0.000008438736,0.000020397842,0.9246071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890184,0.00001738309,0.00023212213,0.00024794607,0.00037125955,0.00022942974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949646,0.00005962021,0.000137337,0.00016535033,0.00006783028,0.00007338623],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001247223,0.00014142088,0.00031342547,0.00008902654,0.00009900606,0.00006156053,0.00029865265,0.00021055303,0.0025566178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054520773,0.00012576632,0.00007238792,0.00007292107,0.00013246205,0.00012591282,0.000057897512,0.00021986688,0.0021990687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074415934,0.000016236969,0.0023010185,0.00007256862,0.000023459228,0.000019937692,0.008294063,0.0000026898679,4.2159587e-7,0.9494553,0.01657176,0.02323509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055240176,0.000017181965,0.00016334403,0.000051553263,0.000004843847,8.914944e-8,0.00018508245,5.493864e-7,1.5091541e-7,0.0054785646,0.99385893,0.0001844865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028696857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.096611686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9772872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011022854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000565217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99857783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990727155","doi":"","title":"Nipped in the Bud: How Legal Disparities Create Financial Growth Hurdles in the State-Sanctioned Marijuana Industry and Why Bankruptcy Courts Can Provide a Remedy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Miami law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; State (computer science); Business; Law; Economics; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.013205102627574076,"score_gpt":0.22465827217102444,"score_spread":0.21145316954345036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990727155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83996415,0.020577552,0.000018185034,0.095664315,0.00022674429,0.0027846305,0.000052180374,0.00003479511,0.040677425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863698,0.011101015,0.000009845316,0.0018066511,0.000050496015,0.000001858785,0.0000039909264,0.000003862238,0.0006524815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985098,0.0005737538,0.00015387211,0.00018873757,0.00034916503,0.00022462108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994178,0.00017229623,0.00015392098,0.00013262546,0.00008513474,0.000038234855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012430903,0.00010754744,0.00032432145,0.000041404845,0.0003295838,0.00007287738,0.00036477065,0.00011378139,0.000029498544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014813861,0.00007766612,0.000054336386,0.00036363868,0.00037197265,0.00039082512,0.000049703835,0.00032734903,0.0000022886568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000202647,0.000410108,0.1316106,0.008821615,0.00006936998,0.00020558535,0.058518365,0.0000059567515,0.00003387722,0.75491786,0.0373012,0.007902817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005663263,0.00009084066,0.020407202,0.0026329572,0.00006321518,0.0000040305954,0.01318611,0.0000028030433,0.000003868715,0.0019462986,0.96087676,0.00021959745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31960383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31223214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9235755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000663676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024987126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7003178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993106835","doi":"","title":"Irreconcilable Differences? A Constitutional Analysis as to Why the United States Should Follow Canada's Lead and Allow Same-Sex Marriage","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lead (geology); Political science; Biology","score_opus":0.029057916912850385,"score_gpt":0.29068382459679754,"score_spread":0.26162590768394717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993106835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7355784,0.001121904,0.0025098196,0.11665821,0.0015993089,0.00031550866,0.00014510968,0.000025476775,0.14204626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98603994,0.0001403682,0.00019606025,0.008854242,0.00074383203,0.0000035198855,0.000010120916,0.000004728338,0.0040071933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979998,0.00012993101,0.0004458793,0.00014468402,0.0010612163,0.00021849739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837464,0.00034145158,0.0002958971,0.000072979485,0.000700185,0.00021484359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007848195,0.00012000232,0.0002619031,0.00017699643,0.00046190526,0.00029305537,0.0004843483,0.00005587048,0.00061249454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040892512,0.00008404135,0.00011070728,0.00043003526,0.00039632374,0.00031733766,0.00004566139,0.00019379641,0.00000788337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002446061,0.00014099249,0.08472808,0.000014784921,0.002680044,0.00009718005,0.007097592,0.005025707,0.00013601752,0.84757835,0.04911333,0.003143295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003320664,0.000051367177,0.0030581248,0.000055411438,0.00012623699,0.000023869417,0.0022257671,0.0003331509,0.00009174153,0.0026256263,0.99093115,0.00014548858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69195735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9188748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9418178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027275478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009137398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67063856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993371085","doi":"10.29173/alr2581","title":"Under Construction: A Close Examination of Recent Construction Law Developments and Their Impact on the Oil and Gas Industry","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blueprint; Arbitration; Legislation; Jurisprudence; Law; Order (exchange); Common law; Procurement; Energy law; Construction industry; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Environmental law; Economics; Engineering; Construction engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.02808192877136987,"score_gpt":0.2977293875325276,"score_spread":0.2696474587611577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993371085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5946965,0.009133393,6.708246e-7,0.0074299057,0.00029226395,0.00038191333,0.0000040350697,0.000011589698,0.3880497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9605968,0.03806547,0.000015986823,0.0009568309,0.00005328132,0.0000115888515,0.0000023854304,0.000005569627,0.0002920775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907124,0.00024628273,0.00022942714,0.00016132252,0.00016643909,0.00012525845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923086,0.00030583318,0.0001877808,0.00010886542,0.0001093201,0.000057338555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064177305,0.0001072427,0.000248291,0.000012431828,0.000245823,0.00004801408,0.00007173145,0.0001132583,0.00029656783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000104428815,0.000055212182,0.000029397102,0.00019612456,0.00041824076,0.00019409871,0.000024221945,0.00013762419,0.000011216974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004402851,0.000012069823,0.0013199792,0.00036876602,0.00003530474,9.2491916e-8,0.00088273495,8.534719e-8,0.000013662453,0.8090363,0.0000545082,0.18827209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004439604,0.00012567986,0.0036185756,0.005774273,0.00007679285,0.00004399939,0.0031453331,0.0000018144923,0.0003640276,0.011494494,0.9745728,0.00033824748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0146615505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042187967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9745183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004633836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010336929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9918999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993495833","doi":"","title":"\"Nothing Less than Indispensable\": The Expansion of Federal Magistrate Judge Authority and Utilization in the Past Quarter Century","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Magistrate; Quarter (Canadian coin); Nothing; Law; Political science; History; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.035431519248789504,"score_gpt":0.29144868862936835,"score_spread":0.25601716938057884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993495833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9761246,0.00041078177,0.00012490094,0.008360136,0.0003058749,0.00035107465,0.000009800941,0.000025134023,0.014287692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989578,0.00012888008,0.000010861717,0.00032360147,0.00035011687,0.000012653652,0.0000016148795,0.0000067857773,0.00020767021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844104,0.0004434317,0.00026123622,0.00020000592,0.0003924188,0.00026186858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938947,0.000178219,0.0001133148,0.00017150879,0.00008247142,0.00006499055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014210156,0.000101034944,0.00015272583,0.000023727449,0.00067874946,0.00025757708,0.00027838504,0.00010156167,0.000038598573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013395124,0.00005043323,0.00003709244,0.0001885636,0.00032983738,0.00057108037,0.000036727823,0.00015300077,0.00001083884],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110209156,0.00015524896,0.29221866,0.00017379466,0.000027250506,0.000014177814,0.13274704,0.0000026675616,0.0033085204,0.5563304,0.002332028,0.012580017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024388493,0.00029269833,0.5519703,0.0012106507,0.00006126723,0.00001048864,0.12693694,0.000043970533,0.001962206,0.051061183,0.26308972,0.00092169177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04542025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056270335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5052692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040333092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000096677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96095026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993727139","doi":"","title":"Evolution, Child Abuse and the Constitution","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Plaintiff; Scrutiny; Equal Protection Clause; Law; Constitution; Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Supreme court; Criminology; Wrongful death; Sentence; Political science; Damages","score_opus":0.010145256629287233,"score_gpt":0.24806300294556796,"score_spread":0.23791774631628074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993727139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047645126,0.0055647288,0.00038756404,0.0024406544,0.0007657893,0.00046118855,0.0000038986427,0.000104605766,0.9426264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974166,0.00021380886,0.000039407965,0.0007135424,0.00042576966,0.000019542947,6.676981e-7,0.0000041570047,0.0011664716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988948,0.0002897214,0.00016271917,0.0001664359,0.0002592085,0.00022710323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994846,0.00008984575,0.00006924571,0.00012904908,0.00009871928,0.0001285665],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010605116,0.00007980854,0.00013312632,0.00001697195,0.0017348985,0.00018648728,0.00012394585,0.00008106078,0.00014821606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005727486,0.0000558274,0.00003963839,0.00022018251,0.0011722654,0.00034774822,0.000010764929,0.00015050978,0.00012897469],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008836222,0.0000102637705,0.0020127837,0.000006188494,0.0000070504666,9.638342e-7,0.0013852589,0.00000383626,0.000005396205,0.9955457,0.0009745909,0.0000391285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007326157,0.0000095697515,0.00062272855,0.000039622686,0.000016494861,0.000005756192,0.0016778116,0.0000028716727,0.00003842818,0.04050396,0.9562358,0.00011429843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035635743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022161039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95526123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006470948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016968761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994487570","doi":"","title":"Panel 2: How Are Laws Applied and Detention Practices Reformed?Litigation: Taking Cases and Those Responsible to Court","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Torture; Interrogation; Law; Accountability; Political science; Administration (probate law); Acknowledgement; Human rights; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Computer security","score_opus":0.08251636393225717,"score_gpt":0.33531091775036204,"score_spread":0.2527945538181049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994487570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839863,0.0011668988,0.0002099536,0.012424274,0.00007395754,0.00016073756,0.0000046655214,0.000008011334,0.0019652015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976922,0.0012727352,0.00010860016,0.00037189308,0.000497106,0.0000018178768,3.1662236e-7,0.000005984635,0.00004934624],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922246,0.00006936002,0.00018110583,0.00011484704,0.00026556553,0.00014668584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999423,0.00013744089,0.000101509155,0.000045001463,0.0001470223,0.00014602255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005839661,0.0000880535,0.00021799868,0.000051458115,0.00041559828,0.00026915452,0.000057231115,0.00006196599,0.0000040716723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009870405,0.00006786724,0.000034500597,0.00012726792,0.00007471858,0.00053890917,0.0000056965514,0.00012506662,2.9986586e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029654037,0.0004957528,0.0067127086,0.00055444863,0.0002918838,0.000249416,0.105513565,0.000025155641,0.41421866,0.19927137,0.00069768913,0.26900393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007283378,0.0058717285,0.5520121,0.0047902204,0.0011927359,0.0006071213,0.12331802,0.0000888132,0.030858336,0.16553676,0.10611564,0.0023251434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037884832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041920514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5452994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024456416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008890503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3196488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995404007","doi":"","title":"Leadership and Strategic Change on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08909117494085535,"score_gpt":0.22693483992413196,"score_spread":0.1378436649832766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995404007","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7859807,0.00013914224,6.8649115e-7,0.025746195,0.00017638179,0.00025480016,0.000025722638,0.0000075892776,0.18766877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99666226,0.000015292597,0.000003233809,0.00007842728,0.000029250652,1.5925278e-7,4.0605528e-7,0.000003161338,0.003207807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903005,0.0002481769,0.00006336704,0.000104610845,0.0003850144,0.00016875827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931425,0.0001577427,0.00012175214,0.00023378059,0.00011546934,0.000057023015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006212741,0.000060684124,0.00013311149,0.000029193527,0.00068630226,0.00005447951,0.00053776667,0.000059493064,0.000112521164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005017478,0.000044955654,0.00004465397,0.0002721026,0.00030732396,0.00036817061,0.00007206368,0.0002235425,0.0000055761952],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012701948,0.00011210242,0.18505128,0.00018971653,0.00013965732,0.000005977266,0.08612427,0.0000070669084,0.001267869,0.71708435,0.009331124,0.0005595877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049959566,0.00014476418,0.09111699,0.00030637562,0.00005484099,0.0000011258411,0.83907515,0.00003278792,0.00017584926,0.0082380185,0.06008081,0.00027369088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72673064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84381104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7529509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000638869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034523406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52785516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996329874","doi":"","title":"‘Kell v Canada: Revaluating the CEDAW Decision in a Feminist Light’","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Gender studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.03381194680904793,"score_gpt":0.2695996113370498,"score_spread":0.23578766452800187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996329874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022118814,0.00057537056,0.0000045981546,0.0033445016,0.0019775317,0.00071243086,0.000027060269,0.000059263424,0.99307805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22484417,0.000017458842,0.0000373582,0.0017633346,0.0019183721,0.00002148459,0.00001149891,0.00006665411,0.7713197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963434,0.00013769815,0.0006796227,0.0005397343,0.0017520698,0.00054748665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768347,0.0008167555,0.0005297792,0.00047938566,0.0003250287,0.00016557612],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003839283,0.00030437578,0.0004970731,0.00013252917,0.00087409856,0.002554793,0.0011525726,0.0005109784,0.0002662187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019136561,0.0002314341,0.00012278404,0.00007272411,0.00014933989,0.0005162091,0.00023932336,0.0010848099,0.0000694816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019103118,0.0000065519707,0.00020174422,0.00010797595,0.00003379628,0.000052367657,0.011424254,0.000003351564,0.00001022764,0.6377431,0.32221627,0.028181208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014700767,0.000013825427,0.000031574513,0.0009891737,0.00002019067,0.0000020746036,0.0010208046,0.0000066502002,0.0000052995006,0.012884504,0.98457456,0.00030434807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8033398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97717315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6623583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077587296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007197938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004006291","doi":"10.11575/prism/34532","title":"Parenting Assessments and Their Use in Family Law Disputes in Alberta, British Columbia and Ontario","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child custody; Law; Family law; Political science; Criminology; Geography; Psychology","score_opus":0.06332613530043898,"score_gpt":0.33627959105203303,"score_spread":0.272953455751594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004006291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90635806,0.000058324662,3.8832488e-7,0.000077078126,0.00008302884,0.0002688454,0.0000054808997,4.917415e-7,0.0931483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919857,0.0000265993,0.00009476923,0.000035787165,0.000032619668,0.0000104377,0.0000019512267,0.0000043858136,0.0078077978],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992518,0.000059798116,0.00015739372,0.00023687833,0.000094500116,0.00019963967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961054,0.00010052155,0.00009842146,0.00010317092,0.000022486529,0.00006483682],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051523367,0.00005351776,0.00017901199,0.000009708464,0.00071330636,0.006597112,0.00027130707,0.000062829145,0.000108217275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011745338,0.00006857946,0.000009518298,0.000037753794,0.00019039064,0.0014809903,0.0002302089,0.00009292563,0.0000030623921],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026285343,0.000026488422,0.9602113,0.0000037553446,0.0000039917295,0.000010301777,0.008992636,6.493488e-8,0.000012548451,0.000084657135,0.00005969247,0.030591987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000362277,0.000014804251,0.9089072,0.00023279242,0.0000027038777,8.4297477e-7,0.0031146433,0.0000061952787,0.0000038895005,0.00059649587,0.086647026,0.00011116358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99917746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08658733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052634106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001577912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005981645","doi":"","title":"Robots, Regulation, and the Changing Nature of Public Spaces","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Robot; Public space; Commercialization; Space (punctuation); Robotics; Business; Political science; Engineering; Public relations; Computer security; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Law; Architectural engineering","score_opus":0.012311811127671527,"score_gpt":0.2593195108787194,"score_spread":0.2470076997510479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005981645","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4111879,0.11629721,0.010675642,0.4328593,0.0006517824,0.00063392974,0.0000020932891,0.000095085554,0.027597075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99517655,0.0032040428,0.000010499786,0.0002601012,0.00096333463,0.0000012131217,2.5606738e-7,0.0000052413316,0.0003787364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985125,0.00019414254,0.00014699531,0.000082404695,0.00028876236,0.0007752183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995199,0.00006915912,0.00017301335,0.00003766419,0.00013104107,0.0000692496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002918488,0.000054254026,0.00013046713,0.000039722836,0.0006271477,0.00013174805,0.00018280174,0.000075409414,0.00001679484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000519818,0.000034678953,0.00004446521,0.00041085528,0.00020198316,0.00026572534,0.00002472624,0.00077864766,0.0000015794619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015285925,0.0000032773187,0.0015089993,0.0000061409783,0.00003535518,1.7457688e-7,0.009645443,0.0000059588574,0.00001846861,0.98444366,0.000088936555,0.004228283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014643609,0.00014437064,0.0010059128,0.000051564093,0.000058332666,0.00003567257,0.13882731,0.00019135683,0.000060735438,0.7858771,0.07206895,0.00021431356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005695563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030341418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58398867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008141907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012029206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48235762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006231166","doi":"","title":"Avro Canada Orenda","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Alphascript Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Geology","score_opus":0.0176221467649386,"score_gpt":0.24296944119482286,"score_spread":0.22534729442988427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006231166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004768447,0.0006843227,0.00000945754,0.0028691,0.011199075,0.00045022558,0.00012359618,0.0002782251,0.98433834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01895504,0.000014382871,0.000047454465,0.002634556,0.008378666,0.00003825705,0.00011358067,0.00010390253,0.96971416],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99556506,0.00014713695,0.0006451405,0.0006979614,0.001983442,0.00096123706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972486,0.00025009265,0.0005992122,0.00057784043,0.0007254765,0.0005987975],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015473467,0.00045510675,0.0006630496,0.00017796208,0.0013751546,0.004310849,0.0017008508,0.0012721895,0.00062259636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017872716,0.0004539174,0.00018116058,0.00011020113,0.0004504937,0.0013182916,0.00020800179,0.0022957365,0.00003751292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035483727,0.0000059348718,0.00001060515,0.000057656183,0.000055372173,0.00006350486,0.002124608,8.3274216e-8,0.000012611133,0.09840856,0.8884607,0.010796845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016459964,0.000013463022,0.0000039832753,0.0001643387,0.000051919396,0.0000043562195,0.00042485876,4.903031e-7,0.00002545699,0.019621555,0.9789825,0.00054244476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98232394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99731416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09052186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001165538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03146442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006632041","doi":"","title":"You Made Gideon a Promise, Eh?: Advocating for Mandated Publicly Appointed Counsel at Bail Hearings in the United States Through Domestic Comparisons with Canadian Practices and Legal Considerations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.031388970557142244,"score_gpt":0.3066943899697634,"score_spread":0.27530541941262116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006632041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9549901,0.00031565412,0.000043487897,0.0225395,0.00011307361,0.002063035,0.0000634129,0.000078137535,0.019793613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99490774,0.000039856997,0.000651341,0.0024314942,0.00010315072,0.00017670431,0.00010631355,0.000021048783,0.001562375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980476,0.00029512498,0.00034650398,0.00038044126,0.0003783156,0.00055203744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798024,0.0008597163,0.00034780413,0.00021037404,0.00036613148,0.00023572614],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013039086,0.00018141647,0.00029327013,0.00010032529,0.0015466701,0.0011886071,0.0002130294,0.00011235388,0.00011892791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010528278,0.00013561964,0.000027851349,0.00065849646,0.00029973235,0.0013364905,0.00002678475,0.00031123983,0.00002905164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047713434,0.00035111335,0.1844521,0.0006292918,0.00027071522,0.000088574205,0.07149434,0.0005825507,0.0004828725,0.71162856,0.029472461,0.00007029118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023803278,0.00032162401,0.009204742,0.00037005878,0.00009521108,0.000057293866,0.050489917,0.0012384556,0.00007367197,0.003637174,0.93158394,0.0005476014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94539696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97527444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9021115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021359921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001105948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011027392","doi":"","title":"Welcomed Participants' or 'Environmental Vigilantes'?The CEPA Environmental Protection Action and theRole Of Citizen Suits in Federal Environmental Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Action (physics); Political science; Environmental law; Environmental protection; Geography","score_opus":0.051198315684278316,"score_gpt":0.2692325831660606,"score_spread":0.21803426748178226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011027392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99134755,0.00054067187,0.000018575696,0.00064325857,0.00025093203,0.00045733026,0.000031788128,0.000018211716,0.0066916924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99811536,0.00068386283,0.000011958577,0.0001861145,0.00043185044,0.000025211673,0.0000030196761,0.000021178817,0.0005214608],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785876,0.00041758252,0.0004445375,0.00022019166,0.0005818898,0.0004770084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993628,0.000077827295,0.00028040592,0.00010871457,0.000003101904,0.00016710784],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080339354,0.00017112697,0.0002486458,0.00004061494,0.0014673558,0.00016216072,0.00018999421,0.0001280739,0.0012506031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021380432,0.00012398046,0.000071737435,0.00007986,0.00074643194,0.0005440012,0.00006265708,0.00037146025,0.000038301438],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034537292,0.0067077833,0.3728458,0.0002836874,0.00073940924,0.00065280317,0.21173863,0.0004261724,0.2608897,0.015765738,0.0010859009,0.12541065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015610994,0.0037546917,0.2779463,0.00065056863,0.00036713856,0.0015663273,0.16371073,0.0023132705,0.029100034,0.008094305,0.4936925,0.0031931486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049293926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014520429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49260658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002354336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014787556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011030870","doi":"10.1525/fsr.2020.32.3.125","title":"Looking Backward and Moving Forward","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Sentencing Reporter","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legislature; Law; Context (archaeology); Criminal justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Quarter (Canadian coin); Order (exchange); Sentencing guidelines; Sociology; History; Sentence","score_opus":0.026084565107569957,"score_gpt":0.2779666017560384,"score_spread":0.2518820366484684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011030870","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90773517,0.00032265647,0.0015727405,0.012760537,0.0004778919,0.00028363333,0.0000012432341,0.000238566,0.07660757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99598247,0.000020055857,0.00018621763,0.002123917,0.0011073285,0.000004654732,0.0000011082792,0.000013063848,0.0005611822],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986986,0.00004939441,0.00029654498,0.0002923216,0.0003526704,0.0003104501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940616,0.00003880569,0.00015422354,0.00007023991,0.000092824936,0.00023777274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035009193,0.000103883904,0.0001959597,0.00002079233,0.00071103405,0.0003011664,0.00008417736,0.00007234651,0.000082737606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045797354,0.00009433988,0.00005750765,0.0001385637,0.00008096827,0.00034445222,0.0000628076,0.0001081517,0.000017712433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079679914,0.000051175033,0.7778949,0.00041494187,0.00017426482,0.0009154216,0.12916417,0.000026452866,0.007960951,0.0049563167,0.025639744,0.05272198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014055653,0.00034908325,0.036647238,0.000647774,0.000121832294,0.0001732323,0.09859334,0.001300689,0.0021096074,0.0064432137,0.8503589,0.0018495008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015463574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027642192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8247192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004629283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000110413974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99109256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011774774","doi":"","title":"Walking the Centre Line: Balancing an Employee's Right to Privacy in Drug andAlcohol Policies in the Atlantic Offshore Oil Industry","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Right whale; Petroleum industry; Line (geometry); Business; Right to privacy; Submarine pipeline; Internet privacy; Law; Engineering; Political science; Computer science; Fishery","score_opus":0.018885409040244484,"score_gpt":0.29919442617670855,"score_spread":0.28030901713646406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011774774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9534311,0.00024964512,0.000004954627,0.0078531355,0.00036821447,0.00016657797,0.000002451788,0.000023710814,0.03790016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965989,0.00006418973,0.000028456727,0.001826176,0.0012097288,0.000006098903,9.641994e-7,0.000016823871,0.00024865617],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970245,0.0010066425,0.00045351448,0.00019948902,0.000671643,0.0006442518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991405,0.00020419914,0.00016047429,0.00021156004,0.00010238883,0.0001809026],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033398194,0.00016479274,0.0002464754,0.00009692023,0.0015054704,0.00070837553,0.0007654651,0.00016539545,0.00007906199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004417242,0.000095073265,0.00006237414,0.00085317617,0.00015461793,0.00049117475,0.000047943802,0.00112896,0.000010500621],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029999519,0.00021152144,0.49698246,0.00003787645,0.000025694677,0.00032582282,0.40760282,0.00027877785,0.00015749014,0.08784066,0.0030230198,0.0034838787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011228584,0.0000807074,0.082293876,0.00079574436,0.000038555405,0.00021405579,0.116990946,0.000013589221,0.00036805178,0.009107233,0.78834665,0.00062770344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078503184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37596008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7853237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013925706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027573918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016750273","doi":"","title":"Patient v. God: Determining the Standard of Care for Christian Science Practitioners in Medical Negligence Cases","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medical negligence; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.034342414452244195,"score_gpt":0.3832997399443293,"score_spread":0.34895732549208514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016750273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98653305,0.0054840744,0.000093213006,0.003382265,0.0013414116,0.00031122274,0.000019290608,0.000008338191,0.002827159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985134,0.0005036122,0.00019402984,0.0001444639,0.00062366895,0.000006946263,1.6788367e-7,0.0000058166975,0.000007868937],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976069,0.00010873075,0.0005742688,0.00013023449,0.0012970961,0.0002827916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960459,0.00057205727,0.0006277957,0.00007900652,0.002568804,0.00010643143],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020436982,0.00009296041,0.00035226316,0.00012196657,0.0011480006,0.000080272825,0.000373186,0.00004639437,0.000012079904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008701462,0.00005853717,0.0000755022,0.0005487711,0.002226488,0.0005729501,0.00008672975,0.00015609585,6.311871e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012129551,0.0002607122,0.034838486,0.00047573086,0.00022938255,0.00026610043,0.83381504,0.000047059373,0.00024280447,0.022662906,0.0055962303,0.1003526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011713846,0.005294256,0.005262605,0.0017802622,0.000099533245,0.000060697035,0.6531918,0.00001277498,0.0031047445,0.0009827616,0.32870466,0.00033453482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002946177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023809085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32310843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021291747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016180152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3017116148","doi":"","title":"製薬業界におけるデータ保護 : 日本とカナダの比較研究 = The pharmaceutical industry in the Great White North and Land of the Rising Sun : a comparison of regulatory data protection in Canada and Japan","year":2004,"lang":"ja","type":"book","venue":"知的財産研究所 eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); Pharmaceutical industry; White paper; Business; International trade; Natural resource economics; Environmental protection; Geography; Political science; Economics; Law; Biotechnology; Biology","score_opus":0.07415641562206027,"score_gpt":0.3101240314112957,"score_spread":0.23596761578923542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3017116148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9752686,0.0014700771,0.0000010127158,0.00092268677,0.00027243642,0.0017341031,0.00012313167,0.0000059449167,0.020202026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977504,0.00003269968,0.000001687909,0.0001344585,0.00026805638,0.000025728265,0.000006215933,0.00001902787,0.0017617324],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966313,0.00075403886,0.000844563,0.0004906683,0.0008732252,0.00040617652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982117,0.00026783365,0.0006916634,0.0006518161,0.00008542452,0.00009160877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014736694,0.0003131106,0.0006690162,0.000080478414,0.00051162654,0.00009691931,0.0010198343,0.0005561985,0.000009505894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014884042,0.00017799399,0.000046701407,0.00028746887,0.0012553468,0.00013268569,0.00040345537,0.0022339078,1.772432e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016610112,0.000082826235,0.8816446,0.0011786472,0.00011325825,0.00001049754,0.09764578,0.00011505932,0.000054004755,0.0006343203,0.0005317136,0.01782318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036376733,0.0002771192,0.8332125,0.0065846457,0.0006912442,0.00006197035,0.056554396,0.0012818887,0.00042224454,0.002223973,0.093724206,0.0013281658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94499946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99377435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09319249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049279426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005568686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.987861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3029923822","doi":"","title":"Issuance of the Keystone XL Permit: Presidential Prerogative or Presidential “Chutzpah”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Presidential system; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.027829896464397277,"score_gpt":0.2969604624097633,"score_spread":0.26913056594536605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3029923822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80971193,0.0026884393,0.000289672,0.016694067,0.0029638747,0.0027529232,0.00014206092,0.00037703034,0.16438001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98887163,0.000059648082,0.00007918839,0.00082586496,0.0021847696,0.00003967654,0.0000018526636,0.0000236675,0.007913672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722445,0.00044688061,0.00048284433,0.00042047715,0.0009937502,0.00043159773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986393,0.00014589871,0.0003552528,0.00029755555,0.0002602679,0.00030171566],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043238254,0.00019357647,0.00037345855,0.000019155794,0.00084153423,0.00021502,0.000943551,0.00016890228,0.0016818315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012202848,0.00013950135,0.0001774597,0.0005731057,0.00068900967,0.0007635748,0.00023610886,0.00031693303,0.00017653439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019711223,0.0006784546,0.03470354,0.0016488654,0.0007734069,0.00012308087,0.19248681,0.00049812667,0.021711348,0.6002825,0.14292967,0.0021930912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033788267,0.0007162135,0.029757129,0.00089508615,0.0003975778,0.000008328922,0.018963763,0.00011675297,0.06529029,0.011083377,0.86795783,0.0014348467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05201824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04098345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72502816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006482402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006366828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033892577","doi":"","title":"With a Little Help from Too Many Friends? Lessons from TWU and Comeau on Intervening Before the Supreme Court","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Viewpoints; Supreme court; Intervention (counseling); Framing (construction); Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.011809589367994755,"score_gpt":0.27187720250325476,"score_spread":0.26006761313526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033892577","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97721463,0.002380851,0.0005076475,0.012602512,0.00032268107,0.00019808453,0.000016633452,0.000030906886,0.0067260345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967178,0.00039438182,0.000017306089,0.0002172521,0.0009511746,0.000004892722,0.0000043429513,0.000018582992,0.001674241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977261,0.0001777709,0.00021553063,0.00023754282,0.00049029454,0.0011527657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932504,0.00013885592,0.0001927415,0.00015248667,0.000087069944,0.00010380385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012560632,0.00014612265,0.00023543155,0.000041295487,0.0007421817,0.0003070873,0.0003834329,0.000090877584,0.00012587673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005396594,0.00009038406,0.00007084189,0.00016211861,0.00014760523,0.00031484643,0.000045678105,0.0012144654,0.000042816602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037904902,0.00014927522,0.14199553,0.000014340448,0.0008503483,0.000018085997,0.05366303,0.00003172774,0.00022712369,0.7710524,0.0008126895,0.030806374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029443612,0.0025170725,0.027284008,0.0008354664,0.00024446222,0.0000698417,0.18598258,0.00018309153,0.0001643938,0.65949035,0.11955286,0.0007314924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036241915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12366654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13231955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041215934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009719484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9701758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034608992","doi":"10.12927/hcpol.2020.26229","title":"The Courts and Two-Tier Medicare","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Healthcare policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Health care; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.0472190968272542,"score_gpt":0.3788073601656157,"score_spread":0.33158826333836156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034608992","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005790195,0.12552391,0.000010734398,0.8422306,0.001223593,0.00030843448,0.000042261345,0.000055288332,0.024814984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9384192,0.014937105,0.00001428036,0.030812403,0.012306471,0.000016355185,0.0000018590657,0.000020744252,0.0034715398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975801,0.00051471294,0.00034724758,0.00030360467,0.0005308364,0.00072351075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982662,0.00028005053,0.00015855649,0.00014115463,0.00019856638,0.00095546833],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060468295,0.00016581814,0.00026378746,0.000024529876,0.0016928448,0.0001741117,0.00027198927,0.00018501357,0.00006402514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009404656,0.00012640923,0.000059327438,0.00052478095,0.00094753475,0.00018127517,0.00010426326,0.0003670332,0.00013698889],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011835702,0.000008251213,0.0011087046,0.00035369815,0.000018845236,0.0000111520785,0.05213583,4.8657057e-7,0.0000015504962,0.6992643,0.029671956,0.21741343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018580255,0.00010471169,0.0005421987,0.000121359684,0.000012145609,0.0000045028946,0.0055742133,0.00005151329,0.0000035199175,0.016271878,0.97699183,0.00013631815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33184525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022536673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94731987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015714283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017959457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W303835224","doi":"","title":"投資協定仲裁判断例研究(18)最近の仲裁人忌避申立てに対する判断--Vito G. Gallo v Government of Canada事件における忌避申立てに対する決定(Decision on the Challenge to Mr. J. Christopher Thomas, QC)","year":2010,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"JCAジャーナル","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023330159080194247,"score_gpt":0.2812254961925654,"score_spread":0.25789533711237117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W303835224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36629277,0.0013300135,0.000034988243,0.042333588,0.008945854,0.002089733,0.00023234896,0.00009676985,0.5786439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786269,0.00041845324,0.000106164276,0.0016844146,0.003592895,0.000093355695,0.0000024849842,0.00008077271,0.015394559],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99192303,0.00037137762,0.0011294406,0.001048672,0.004377875,0.0011496241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958513,0.0010387455,0.00069269934,0.0013298435,0.00038088934,0.0007065378],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027352336,0.0006377096,0.00092224235,0.00009926848,0.001194566,0.00029130903,0.0017942176,0.0006302605,0.0042307586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014650747,0.00045620246,0.0003899325,0.0010072049,0.00050219655,0.00029182743,0.00037248424,0.0010993828,0.00040798105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001017965,0.002165433,0.002637352,0.00054413354,0.0004129916,0.00014836004,0.06790619,0.00011651571,0.017602839,0.21886009,0.6445683,0.04401979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063124043,0.0006791056,0.0043457616,0.0005551198,0.00009764287,0.0000029839289,0.009187145,0.000055190692,0.0022412443,0.0023294655,0.9791017,0.00077337725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07155579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13589713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61233413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046121862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074410386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039067449","doi":"","title":"Book Review: A Parent-Partner Status for American Family Law by Merle H. Weiner","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Psychology; Genealogy; Political science; History","score_opus":0.039273711452433996,"score_gpt":0.3395010143025037,"score_spread":0.3002273028500697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039067449","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004804295,0.5467082,0.00011849,0.021592278,0.003202416,0.0009634959,0.0004360544,0.000025109553,0.42214963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85746473,0.02850346,0.00017427666,0.1028586,0.0023994013,0.000037167683,0.0000124253365,0.000058113616,0.008491811],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803364,0.000115042945,0.0005101728,0.00018904988,0.0003986718,0.0007534335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969669,0.000064821455,0.0008055117,0.00028364695,0.0005579814,0.0013211275],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076035946,0.000168048,0.0005329464,0.000051478986,0.0020053522,0.00044799436,0.00071003404,0.00007657654,0.00010200302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032900512,0.00014596598,0.00020571412,0.00010399721,0.0012263679,0.00077257573,0.000014633205,0.00020324538,0.000022426048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010393324,0.000010291359,0.0003419348,0.00006912588,0.000046290785,0.000026809936,0.000592725,5.605897e-7,0.00007454852,0.029498322,0.9675267,0.0018023009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030599508,0.00012928688,0.0004024285,0.00046013427,0.00006137388,0.0000023542227,0.0007844738,8.745037e-7,0.000018896219,0.0005531322,0.99708116,0.0001999013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66362697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54740864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8526604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002490811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021391269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039642515","doi":"","title":"A Feminist Critique of Quebec v. A. : Evaluating the Supreme Court's Divided Opinion on Section 15 and Common Law Support Obligations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Law; Supreme court; Political science; Common law; Majority opinion; Business","score_opus":0.08359551058275173,"score_gpt":0.3771282442904529,"score_spread":0.29353273370770117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039642515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.750957,0.0005789443,0.000016644331,0.013142756,0.0020661568,0.0003096978,0.000053072752,0.000007996337,0.23286772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99807066,0.000038487146,0.000016678503,0.0009640756,0.0007260259,0.0000028728311,0.000001492417,0.000007660266,0.000172045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987978,0.0002083644,0.00035100407,0.00009179957,0.0003403758,0.00021067615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998524,0.00017305076,0.00048354804,0.00016660124,0.0003513119,0.00030150585],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018152657,0.000080282865,0.00020123224,0.00005330184,0.0025940342,0.00045100934,0.0003358301,0.000090814836,0.000022787151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038739512,0.00006409844,0.00006209016,0.00006842061,0.0008560957,0.00038217832,0.000012813367,0.0002198,0.000001561087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003094778,0.000022548917,0.014144494,0.000048949245,0.000051627536,0.000020034218,0.01552287,0.000022355967,0.0005797857,0.9581141,0.0074463543,0.003995947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015855638,0.0017636094,0.1787227,0.0021006288,0.00013769635,0.000069942966,0.030914463,0.00006547297,0.00071850314,0.062263533,0.7210741,0.000583794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90152687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9789939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89585054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001464236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017527113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99870443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3040664743","doi":"","title":"Family Violence and Evolving Judicial Roles: Judges as Equality Guardians in Family Law Cases","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Family law; Political science; Domestic violence; Sociology; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine; Poison control; Environmental health","score_opus":0.03198261990149851,"score_gpt":0.31997426403961426,"score_spread":0.28799164413811573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3040664743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7387445,0.0048995535,0.000012051062,0.0007514012,0.0005395869,0.00035144782,0.000028400647,0.000103004546,0.25457004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954675,0.0009444825,0.00006079204,0.002022958,0.0011543954,0.000038149497,0.0000027383774,0.000023820803,0.00028515578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972999,0.0002724455,0.0004682676,0.00058666605,0.00067290134,0.00069982087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983694,0.000259241,0.00028876564,0.00052533194,0.00019159082,0.00036567793],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016901814,0.00025171248,0.00049153314,0.000054933127,0.0028978537,0.0010808408,0.00072818965,0.00026463022,0.00007435056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015428928,0.00025220876,0.00009733111,0.00015936997,0.0011903754,0.0015127213,0.00022513863,0.00037710156,0.0001781482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083574116,0.00014842502,0.16678125,0.00014082275,0.000047124286,0.00026387302,0.0065169134,0.000008483628,0.0011539971,0.81629807,0.0013833168,0.007174155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031264941,0.00051680085,0.39288267,0.004223055,0.0001410377,0.000024018662,0.039558012,0.000045374,0.000783039,0.27020928,0.28583857,0.00265162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70937186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45600095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5460888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001664502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004004095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041055734","doi":"","title":"The Suicide Clause","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian military history","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dependent clause; Computer science; Natural language processing","score_opus":0.04223727702105613,"score_gpt":0.24411578007356782,"score_spread":0.2018785030525117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3041055734","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021532062,0.18364108,0.000008985426,0.08175167,0.0027006685,0.00043297658,0.00002491127,0.00014767982,0.70975995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98129666,0.0005910043,0.000010199383,0.010520634,0.0010381693,0.0000097337925,0.0000023735963,0.000011157663,0.0065200897],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906915,0.00010945525,0.0001266314,0.00015410168,0.00018203205,0.00035864214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888617,0.00007348161,0.000019493604,0.000120147335,0.00006409694,0.0008365839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003081349,0.00006534713,0.000086389686,0.0000263236,0.00096781243,0.000006798868,0.00032935935,0.000064160915,0.00043027665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005106798,0.000056715842,0.0000471717,0.00012864383,0.00039795847,0.00012786163,0.00000907588,0.00013133023,0.0003017628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049219975,0.0000016561127,0.0007107053,0.000008438,0.000007677967,0.000029802353,0.022609755,0.0000021312057,0.000014441241,0.016742652,0.9564989,0.0033688918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036516176,0.000017371214,0.00046585634,0.0000045702545,0.000004134136,1.8941194e-7,0.0030334948,0.00000549372,9.180324e-7,0.00019991102,0.99615026,0.000081311875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.943311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.987181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9597646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012858568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032946619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74437284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3047249928","doi":"","title":"The Detention of Huawei’s CFO is Legally Justified. Why Doesn’t the U.S. Say So?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law; Computer science; Computer security; Political science","score_opus":0.017959887433916036,"score_gpt":0.2834534215149981,"score_spread":0.26549353408108206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3047249928","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16260354,0.0060269767,0.0006347716,0.07520584,0.006579707,0.0015860054,0.000049743096,0.00029153208,0.74702185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98471385,0.00020707113,0.00004454053,0.003767583,0.0023368362,0.000027809845,0.0000016452807,0.000016713275,0.008883963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787015,0.0002989348,0.0003947557,0.00027031923,0.00070625066,0.00045957265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853116,0.00021932322,0.00025980742,0.0004113506,0.00043724666,0.0001411095],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017372275,0.00014276974,0.00019952157,0.00002332236,0.0030277278,0.00050739234,0.00076399214,0.00014701499,0.0004731077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004270983,0.00008178553,0.00013889461,0.0003932914,0.0015166035,0.00043917962,0.00009360497,0.00022775879,0.00034483193],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007433033,0.00007026882,0.0016068238,0.00005647092,0.0000903394,0.0000025340041,0.009104017,0.0000021560195,0.0019236599,0.8505587,0.12480727,0.01170344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016190491,0.000074082265,0.0010000124,0.000052593503,0.000034053966,8.058916e-7,0.0032145802,0.00000574475,0.001769975,0.018871957,0.9746774,0.00013688343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0941646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17320465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84987015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006827235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003313912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049431473","doi":"","title":"Gender-Identity Protection, Trade, and the Trump Administration: A Tale of Reluctant Progressivism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Sexual orientation; Political science; Inclusion (mineral); Identity (music); Negotiation; Law; Business; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.013626673808079394,"score_gpt":0.2765362668559764,"score_spread":0.26290959304789696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049431473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9652929,0.009818612,0.0010407626,0.009574268,0.00045394117,0.001111024,0.0000016320316,0.000034144952,0.012672748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99726015,0.0015989679,0.000008041783,0.000028568531,0.00039259088,0.000012665805,2.2320862e-7,0.0000066462617,0.0006921592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982878,0.0002207311,0.0002648751,0.00012131061,0.00043108498,0.00067421555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994666,0.000030923344,0.0002912465,0.000079292826,0.00008169162,0.000050252835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003117761,0.00007425867,0.00016640211,0.00003413739,0.00053698913,0.00013512706,0.00019060088,0.000067805086,0.000030808482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013028721,0.00004903677,0.00006826991,0.00023196201,0.00027317807,0.0004812354,0.000015066167,0.00061753613,0.0000051146244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013884353,0.00004093574,0.002461817,0.000031602238,0.00007428766,0.0000010078321,0.0043947953,7.6905997e-7,0.00012710571,0.9858371,0.000021337382,0.0068704244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023490204,0.00067705265,0.004221335,0.00007926593,0.000070702736,0.00034701618,0.026195288,0.00003348377,0.00022238109,0.945686,0.019886807,0.0002316396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011127723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005303136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040151067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015893384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002675864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47468677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082070622","doi":"","title":"RETHINKING CANADA’S DUTY TO CONSULT DOCTRINE: ACCOMMODATING ABORIGINAL RIGHTS IN THE DEPLOYMENT OF SMALL MODULAR REACTORS (SMRs)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"University Library (University of Saskatchewan)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Software deployment; Doctrine; Modular design; Duty; Political science; Engineering; Business; Law; Computer science; Software engineering; Operating system","score_opus":0.011437777458544223,"score_gpt":0.21108788125937608,"score_spread":0.19965010380083187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082070622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9462717,0.00006212648,0.00002405549,0.0028699,0.00027736434,0.0005722775,0.00013215138,0.000056677596,0.049733713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932841,0.00005819383,0.0006126469,0.000101145924,0.00008981225,9.1031495e-8,0.00019427491,0.000011535639,0.005648179],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979961,0.0003499271,0.00024011216,0.00039720477,0.00069763383,0.0003190068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868184,0.0002230984,0.00049926253,0.00024252223,0.00015518465,0.00019806721],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002740423,0.00022765329,0.00052256335,0.0002522411,0.00068881427,0.000037912756,0.0014177198,0.00027905643,0.00014905313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031694904,0.00025623184,0.00013550608,0.0011086,0.00014677912,0.00078065525,0.00010213757,0.000496415,0.0000033171648],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067218835,0.00013489538,0.011459499,0.00056763436,0.0001869782,0.00061106944,0.9630507,0.000070691174,0.0001963268,0.018654862,0.0037366217,0.0006585012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005425189,0.00007048705,0.006269652,0.00049345224,0.00012459795,4.9717994e-7,0.72806424,0.000014386355,0.0003325809,0.00079365395,0.2629002,0.00039372945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9701714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9900576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2591636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027235772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049604047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082890517","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: The Law of Canada: Home","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.12216481619010341,"score_gpt":0.3939349046415186,"score_spread":0.27177008845141515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082890517","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000070559356,0.005543236,9.632781e-7,0.014521702,0.001726842,0.00035765956,0.00006259714,0.000026801214,0.9776896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3109833,0.0006531781,0.000020011415,0.0010608227,0.006136488,0.000037772483,0.000016180575,0.00003634917,0.6810559],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99526685,0.000628137,0.00042465405,0.00023611459,0.0028548792,0.00058937096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965329,0.00072127284,0.00017810726,0.00034270462,0.0020379215,0.00018705256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006955149,0.00013052252,0.0003831726,0.000062461004,0.001017681,0.00013573683,0.0012596165,0.00029733463,0.00049354054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012028434,0.00007818775,0.000059151185,0.00065148424,0.0011219436,0.00011345421,0.00017022902,0.00050891814,0.000020751691],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020014277,0.0000048605543,0.000008040498,0.00005495776,0.000016685675,0.0000029796631,0.0018683785,5.152609e-7,3.265792e-7,0.25994378,0.73797953,0.00011797113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040308318,0.00002121776,0.0000074017207,0.00010624085,0.0000075807866,2.7278364e-7,0.018294392,3.311893e-7,0.000011206018,0.015709708,0.9656923,0.00010905248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9994734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31091273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049016706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020418908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9851344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093684030","doi":"","title":"The Texas Lawyer's Creed: Exploring Its Origin and Impact over the Last Quarter Century","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Creed; Quarter (Canadian coin); History; Political science; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.08685444479715995,"score_gpt":0.37724065610406987,"score_spread":0.2903862113069099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093684030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51677465,0.0051503144,0.00011322899,0.36249906,0.00709804,0.0007076052,0.000041846393,0.00012632977,0.107488915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814033,0.011092209,0.000014251474,0.0019237272,0.0040026517,0.000011583536,3.354909e-7,0.000033922428,0.0015180248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949943,0.001782335,0.00050205167,0.00030962474,0.0016194552,0.00079224806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99037,0.0077704815,0.00064421166,0.0002851218,0.00054200704,0.00038817732],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008510667,0.0002822045,0.00027683697,0.00008181848,0.0041443557,0.00199109,0.00063971634,0.00027740444,0.00033729477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006811472,0.00012569097,0.00017746328,0.00037902553,0.0006468763,0.0038638355,0.00010486052,0.0027779944,0.00014147822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019683626,0.00037358297,0.016029833,0.000108166794,0.0007819607,0.00052092527,0.054661743,0.000035254026,0.0007978532,0.8173575,0.06767109,0.039693773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004225213,0.00027157215,0.00764183,0.00024145757,0.000060290517,0.00009897453,0.008268048,0.0000033604094,0.00002150932,0.0022534812,0.98047626,0.0002407212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039780163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004604267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91280514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030007868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010192756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3101647335","doi":"","title":"The Treatment of Transgender Prisoners, Not Just an American Problem--A Comparative Analysis of American, Australian, and Canadian Prison Policies Concerning the Treatment of Transgender Prisoners and a \"Universal\" Recommendation To Improve Treatment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & sexuality","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transgender; Prison; Criminology; Transgender Person; Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.07941484820139695,"score_gpt":0.36849445391128843,"score_spread":0.2890796057098915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3101647335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99231184,0.0002147846,0.000070024864,0.003981641,0.000037102378,0.001216086,0.00042501994,0.00001677668,0.0017267353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986552,0.00057435,0.00016258919,0.000044057135,0.000058483372,0.000071149065,0.000045390687,0.000009287607,0.00037948918],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791527,0.0005162341,0.0005389836,0.0003722926,0.0002647621,0.0003924596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986472,0.00023566284,0.0005090434,0.00023380989,0.00015569809,0.0002185447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031568308,0.00025081303,0.00079936004,0.000086002874,0.00063139666,0.000066895635,0.00012771397,0.0000558515,0.000010110502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000043808836,0.00015525371,0.00012326973,0.00082591,0.0014809123,0.00014179439,0.0000048066004,0.000039857765,1.8809106e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055788545,0.0017924533,0.0664037,0.0000556376,0.0033679295,0.0000016389959,0.81008506,0.0006708749,0.0029540882,0.021844173,0.0000681966,0.092198364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002302593,0.01190107,0.13515687,0.000023179487,0.0033203,6.4630956e-7,0.5265522,0.00027519942,0.011147733,0.00014469393,0.30852228,0.0006532503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97427344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9579745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30845407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006325912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002894937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63310623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3102574423","doi":"10.11575/prism/32415","title":"Dividing Property and Allocating Debt Under British Columbia's Family Law Act: The Case Law to Date","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"BC Cancer Agency","keywords":"Law; Debt; Property (philosophy); Political science; Family law; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Finance","score_opus":0.06030970083077203,"score_gpt":0.3198359784500154,"score_spread":0.25952627761924335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3102574423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6264764,0.00014066476,0.00003394652,0.003558292,0.00014073585,0.00069734565,0.000016573946,0.0000052288065,0.36893082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878686,0.000019271522,0.00019002482,0.0010153236,0.00019621917,0.000028321092,4.777433e-7,0.000010419805,0.010671332],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894357,0.00013785795,0.00016748426,0.00028360437,0.00017992032,0.00028757524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994202,0.00015058198,0.00006322064,0.0001367466,0.00008501252,0.00014423497],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010760664,0.0000646292,0.00013952049,0.000004918656,0.0018887284,0.0028176005,0.0003853065,0.000056812736,0.00029824118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001409714,0.000044433345,0.000017802111,0.00013462002,0.0002887186,0.0006535066,0.00029173592,0.000058006488,0.00007281593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014590342,0.00006756148,0.002348529,0.000021545728,0.000056292647,0.00044545572,0.019490149,0.0000013433693,0.003207698,0.015205778,0.006984235,0.95215684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029243194,0.000042816213,0.0004332082,0.00034657118,0.000019950205,0.00007398135,0.011453842,0.0000025730026,0.0001821336,0.0012257694,0.98569113,0.0002356127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8538166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9536642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9787069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034206092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012581187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3102761468","doi":"","title":"Constitutionalism and the Genetic Non-Discrimination Act Reference","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Dissenting opinion; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Federalism; Context (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis); Genetic discrimination; Criminal justice; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.020028458104021474,"score_gpt":0.2781514681079943,"score_spread":0.2581230100039728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3102761468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49230647,0.02944571,0.027445167,0.20393719,0.0008311471,0.0010643725,0.000006539109,0.000113774935,0.24484965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932997,0.005162733,0.000016635053,0.0005325591,0.00072029134,0.0000034597967,5.1671776e-7,0.0000035235512,0.00026055894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872094,0.00014214288,0.00014463371,0.00009954116,0.00027553661,0.00061720324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962205,0.00006524741,0.000099732824,0.00003320705,0.00009808312,0.000081697435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011969348,0.000059175316,0.00010018352,0.000015823685,0.000847787,0.00013226733,0.00017559975,0.000044822267,0.000023611741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002886878,0.000038571132,0.000030804036,0.0001306838,0.0003859506,0.00018582305,0.000018911678,0.0005805075,0.000015327196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029287205,0.0000041660137,0.00040751175,0.000004050602,0.000019897536,9.465381e-7,0.004499128,0.000003984095,0.000029922736,0.9889452,0.00011303829,0.0059428555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001936034,0.00017282266,0.0028447604,0.000041397885,0.00008424372,0.00010154486,0.02583799,0.00016845086,0.00002295552,0.8760931,0.09245276,0.000243969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002956603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050367876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50099325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000151656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025301094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65205777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108428560","doi":"","title":"The Student Loan Bankruptcy Gap","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Student loan; Creditor; Debt; Loan; Business; Quarter (Canadian coin); Phenomenon; Actuarial science; Economics; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.031204617869714193,"score_gpt":0.3068233362966724,"score_spread":0.27561871842695823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108428560","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.080760844,0.004389302,0.00006978678,0.05628274,0.0015125879,0.0007398094,0.000009527078,0.0003753148,0.8558601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902104,0.0001815469,0.000022429633,0.0039748373,0.002413065,0.000025647501,0.0000011055527,0.000014716441,0.0031562294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817204,0.0002066576,0.00025984005,0.00026310724,0.00067293766,0.00042539323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904805,0.00014915194,0.0000989954,0.00018538733,0.00011762002,0.00040076935],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006684874,0.00011998268,0.00017465578,0.000008807398,0.0017425301,0.0005779682,0.00065189734,0.0000836744,0.000404306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042605595,0.00008583639,0.0000871524,0.00032528542,0.0002848745,0.00031119643,0.00010185739,0.00024356341,0.0011566689],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024631889,0.000046194946,0.006357886,0.00002578062,0.000046006477,0.000018940276,0.012060487,0.000008617991,0.00014722339,0.9443688,0.034241494,0.0026539308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001738641,0.000048870705,0.0009174527,0.000017138176,0.0000108550785,2.9785994e-7,0.0052586915,0.0000034611937,0.000078228906,0.0035925468,0.9897581,0.00014051572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018976178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024436686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9555166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006945179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021198235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108486231","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Canada Legal Research Guide: Legislation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.17832400093949366,"score_gpt":0.46640891516382454,"score_spread":0.2880849142243309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108486231","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009643261,0.008259023,0.000013810871,0.017973047,0.0050630546,0.0010639026,0.00007136207,0.00013169248,0.96732765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11334666,0.0017776547,0.00011232023,0.0003845847,0.025214106,0.00013654136,0.00012052064,0.00008963298,0.858818],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98386353,0.0032676149,0.0010019027,0.00079303735,0.0084168585,0.0026570768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99077106,0.0023347693,0.00022600249,0.00071614084,0.005253553,0.00069847086],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027657738,0.00033237896,0.000613802,0.0007068738,0.0043624276,0.0010856664,0.0018289444,0.0010176584,0.003512668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066418247,0.0002995941,0.000117661766,0.0025856022,0.0011722833,0.0010152571,0.00044829873,0.0025703572,0.0005118006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059056088,0.000024799614,0.00013944625,0.00011078663,0.000030302104,0.000022146218,0.0014868737,0.0000010057573,0.0000041268927,0.102284,0.89266646,0.0032241654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008890717,0.000036602065,0.00006417083,0.0002528021,0.000011163288,0.0000016120115,0.011846047,0.0000021865183,0.00002513862,0.0019617903,0.9853447,0.00036488404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99898666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11325023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033494548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037257425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112305715","doi":"","title":"Breaking Ranks (and Precedent): Reference re Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act, 2020 ABCA 74","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Appeal; Law; Political science; Subsidiarity; Substantive due process; Government (linguistics); Supreme court; Separation of powers; Referendum; Greenhouse gas; Parliament; Doctrine; Law and economics; Constitution; Economics; European union; Politics","score_opus":0.019209500498176754,"score_gpt":0.27669472022818536,"score_spread":0.2574852197300086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112305715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85051924,0.01733428,0.0064668353,0.048954118,0.00073556276,0.0007816086,0.0000069478606,0.00036812943,0.07483327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885542,0.008931293,0.000026169888,0.00034810643,0.0016462549,0.0000030636747,9.530083e-7,0.000019744472,0.00047021886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707925,0.00023030567,0.00032869304,0.0002707337,0.00051323406,0.0015777819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992353,0.00005291908,0.00027756763,0.00007464055,0.00011691011,0.00024271586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016587408,0.00015050624,0.0002336468,0.000046519985,0.0011409294,0.00026489235,0.0003116194,0.00013544335,0.000057080677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003110756,0.00013612947,0.00006558397,0.0003715337,0.00010442098,0.00061931106,0.00005498598,0.0014237412,0.000024076964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006483686,0.00015068981,0.014666083,0.00019403995,0.0004683396,0.000055547185,0.081326224,0.00011937493,0.004220479,0.615417,0.0020913593,0.28064248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053985035,0.003174667,0.0050045685,0.000992514,0.00048237338,0.00073731627,0.1344782,0.00044502303,0.0006733905,0.43049222,0.4156664,0.002454825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0083245365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036921065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41357505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005837266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002131356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118576861","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Law: Introduction & Country Information","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.011064737125793077,"score_gpt":0.2409444573655515,"score_spread":0.22987972023975842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118576861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003934876,0.0006757623,0.000014213214,0.056189477,0.0045992862,0.00037662368,0.00022962042,0.00033913052,0.93757194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08048315,0.009422921,0.0010162875,0.13981822,0.22919618,0.00019062735,0.014012495,0.00024388194,0.5256162],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821794,0.00009693468,0.00048074988,0.00022727807,0.00055957306,0.0004175527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989604,0.000040198676,0.0002276487,0.00016191021,0.0001658386,0.00044404322],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029489674,0.00019707391,0.0003033698,0.0001642931,0.0008341806,0.001009168,0.00044607572,0.00054286595,0.0033916598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036772274,0.00018850548,0.00006797263,0.0005405727,0.0001858912,0.0037778968,0.000045144872,0.00035428818,0.000899176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020574082,0.0000015598108,0.00002064271,0.00008961883,0.000013721021,0.0000018073005,0.0016981207,9.811387e-7,1.1719859e-7,0.27358344,0.7236311,0.0009568282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004772079,0.000017004917,0.0000057334055,0.000049942635,0.00001860405,7.425193e-7,0.0027974423,0.0000031262339,0.00000646992,0.0023930196,0.9944173,0.0002429131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9656091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8734963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4119557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002548691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041841893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120624671","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Law: Yukon","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Geography; Political science","score_opus":0.030620002608394016,"score_gpt":0.2797991757128724,"score_spread":0.24917917310447837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120624671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000045703405,0.0031186028,0.000002757705,0.03861103,0.0024638677,0.00035542727,0.00018642868,0.00040279713,0.95485455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.058056805,0.0028084498,0.00031601815,0.05273896,0.022968264,0.000042203344,0.00041988114,0.00015016143,0.86249924],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978102,0.00015005401,0.00039859535,0.00043766643,0.000553532,0.00064996205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985154,0.000103645936,0.00014472062,0.0002018782,0.0000866601,0.00094768783],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023791564,0.000255501,0.0004539271,0.00012280943,0.00091734785,0.00072872016,0.0008607956,0.00066762924,0.0071498314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026436808,0.00023444784,0.00014917977,0.0004696357,0.0002686906,0.00068256125,0.00008232235,0.00039949577,0.0011533108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.737837e-7,0.0000026355865,0.000036689817,0.000063390115,0.00001790667,0.00003370605,0.0013670616,1.2574517e-7,1.5778988e-7,0.29413313,0.7037498,0.0005944428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043331725,0.000019956553,0.0000052333266,0.00013095148,0.000019298699,4.4608947e-7,0.0014651442,9.718427e-7,0.000007876907,0.007778806,0.9902005,0.00032743515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9804133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28645074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016289313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060722134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121162138","doi":"10.29173/alr31","title":"Cut-and-Paste Justice: A Case Comment on &lt;i&gt; Cojocaru v. British Columbia Women's Hospital and Health Centre&lt;/i&gt;","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"B.C. Women's Hospital & Health Centre","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.02434530195155279,"score_gpt":0.2974120474015985,"score_spread":0.2730667454500457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121162138","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16897787,0.43486378,0.000002829334,0.14177302,0.0018817257,0.0055828094,0.00011927658,0.00017610207,0.24662259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8734958,0.09299799,0.000019671032,0.02852289,0.00039972438,0.00010361044,0.000012989242,0.000031422125,0.0044159014],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975273,0.0004063021,0.00050300785,0.0004533247,0.00047245534,0.00063759455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983008,0.00022365375,0.0002445016,0.0002289608,0.00014259749,0.0008594968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013851968,0.00018314889,0.00070056116,0.000012819061,0.00095864834,0.00055638043,0.00017711459,0.00009666083,0.00026292264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032809668,0.00022301677,0.0000642125,0.00026852085,0.0003255849,0.00028084242,0.00008215857,0.00014366175,0.00008032132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000144124015,0.00045199663,0.0007036106,0.006487357,0.00011792894,0.0004829068,0.018633576,3.02135e-7,6.6629394e-7,0.1498008,0.7632476,0.060058814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042965345,0.0003049141,0.000063702784,0.0031123268,0.00008534363,0.000105291416,0.000647885,0.0000018823022,8.237902e-8,0.00043814752,0.994539,0.00027177532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52694684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79956126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7045179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024427337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030955795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.909436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121163730","doi":"","title":"The Evolution - or End - of Marriage?: Reflections on the Impasse over Same-Sex Marriage","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Emblem; Legalization; Institution; Marriage law; Lesbian; Law; Political science; Family law; Writ; Sociology; Gender studies; History","score_opus":0.023231151012212146,"score_gpt":0.3066077325682289,"score_spread":0.28337658155601675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121163730","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14715707,0.0008307008,0.00011156349,0.0076842713,0.0014850214,0.0008462762,0.000050184226,0.00015299083,0.8416819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97699106,0.000051335897,0.000022809132,0.00037696876,0.0016100091,0.000058136528,0.0000026114972,0.000015977628,0.020871075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979781,0.0004130109,0.0003558412,0.00023495659,0.00062011287,0.00039796706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855006,0.0006652465,0.00021748467,0.00035410633,0.000116235,0.00009687533],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013728949,0.00014110457,0.00018402783,0.000034577228,0.0022693183,0.00026585613,0.00041845438,0.0001343389,0.0009131066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049363106,0.000077544675,0.00011561792,0.00053792505,0.000519869,0.00028983786,0.00004898792,0.0002712107,0.0001279358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006416238,0.00006731529,0.0011279875,0.000012109477,0.000025007175,0.0000030777871,0.00065906404,0.000019069048,0.00096004497,0.968191,0.028519113,0.0003519977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029971433,0.00012527016,0.006231128,0.00006790818,0.000030333578,0.0000016144198,0.0040356843,0.000009143292,0.0006028926,0.075601,0.9127928,0.00020250113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25350735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31587145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89259005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027969442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036693842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121551587","doi":"","title":"Section 2(b) Advertising Rights on Government Property: Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority, a New Can of Worms and the Liberty Two-Step?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Offensive; Censorship; Section (typography); Supreme court; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Scope (computer science); Advertising; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Business; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.009869531556974587,"score_gpt":0.24305472176946194,"score_spread":0.23318519021248735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121551587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92041624,0.00007246669,0.00011982559,0.0020678707,0.0030494719,0.0008187285,0.000016607828,0.00007886591,0.0733599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99043006,0.000008030423,0.00010072661,0.00021829962,0.0011348305,0.000017205932,0.0000014170971,0.000010921286,0.008078522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985431,0.00010512832,0.0002673692,0.00023759522,0.0006261022,0.00022072319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940586,0.00005744731,0.00014752879,0.0001522025,0.00007147654,0.00016547182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055207475,0.0001269004,0.0002103266,0.000016000215,0.00062687445,0.00011390261,0.00014339175,0.00011510273,0.00011219858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005697594,0.000066142384,0.000062817555,0.00016383962,0.0002625145,0.00035211383,0.000011225905,0.00028584173,0.0000059535973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023683289,0.00044231693,0.049291525,0.00034231757,0.00033668423,0.000043007778,0.09278176,0.00010130094,0.007497705,0.78129375,0.034771983,0.030729325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0061296755,0.00033665024,0.017489789,0.00051669125,0.00020846423,0.0000041119974,0.0028264355,0.00011540273,0.0088891,0.0452953,0.9174105,0.0007778697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40536505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80772924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8826385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008065289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012444844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59859467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121580119","doi":"","title":"Parent Education Programs in Family Courts: Balancing Autonomy and State Intervention","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Intervention (counseling); Dispute resolution; State (computer science); Conflict resolution; Family law; Psychology; Best practice; Child custody; Political science; Best interests; Social psychology; Public relations; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.014096699668035558,"score_gpt":0.2956563983992676,"score_spread":0.28155969873123204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121580119","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98653334,0.007054931,0.000891582,0.001290808,0.0002536097,0.0002127764,1.6849025e-7,0.000025736395,0.0037370564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969205,0.0020199595,0.000018313054,0.00007344338,0.0002865866,0.0000064583796,0.0000014451476,0.0000043432046,0.00066890405],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842256,0.00011633868,0.00024848417,0.00011928789,0.00019242514,0.0009008933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965984,0.000009168306,0.0001442351,0.00003702607,0.00007849635,0.0000712644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019861914,0.000071509174,0.00011219118,0.000078259574,0.0002499752,0.00017643288,0.00009933031,0.000041006126,0.0000032684156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046348865,0.00006602677,0.000036406735,0.00015816087,0.000035167697,0.00038746317,0.000006941347,0.00049700995,0.000002902793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017276067,0.00018472208,0.02690567,0.00000891749,0.000013989094,0.0000010833811,0.007258602,0.0000043319296,0.000043916516,0.08747938,0.000033222652,0.8780489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007627106,0.0006737288,0.04872715,0.00041375883,0.00001950233,0.000034740675,0.05893232,0.000049770526,0.000007767956,0.8572,0.032892607,0.00028589752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0082890885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024916023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.877763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012233107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003907177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121646640","doi":"","title":"The Personal Information Protectionand Electronic Documents Act: A LostOpportunity to Democratize Canada's\"Technological Society\"","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information society; Political science; Internet privacy; Public relations; Business; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.00823376168224244,"score_gpt":0.24372380977963076,"score_spread":0.23549004809738833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121646640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62943393,0.0004990127,0.00068977574,0.07094265,0.0008400332,0.001553948,0.0000293797,0.00023309528,0.29577821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99523807,0.00023414356,0.000028900064,0.001976126,0.00041441928,0.000025305879,0.0000018052626,0.000005487022,0.0020757618],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981364,0.00012425224,0.00029317467,0.00009670726,0.00078568014,0.0005637985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931985,0.00006229693,0.00013187315,0.00007509196,0.00018285742,0.00022803852],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012426521,0.00010645597,0.000120358396,0.00001574905,0.0053918324,0.0005420955,0.00032344993,0.000112879476,0.00055383483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014470753,0.00007246909,0.00007389037,0.00025741215,0.00019756811,0.0006587654,0.000024787265,0.0005431557,0.00003820816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000342017,0.00014594558,0.0012950288,0.000037119138,0.00027230376,0.000039657727,0.028008668,0.00007960613,0.00009469507,0.23525493,0.11171929,0.62271076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017366487,0.000060661507,0.0003563225,0.0000148000145,0.000007667544,0.000039333183,0.0021591745,0.000016984348,0.000024195746,0.006673759,0.9903594,0.000114004724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4274713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8125731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8786402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055879867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019171777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121699755","doi":"","title":"A \"Reasonable\" Expectation of Sexual Privacy intheDigital Age","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privacy law; Information privacy; Internet privacy; Law; Psychology; Business; Computer science; Political science; Privacy policy","score_opus":0.027124936271374533,"score_gpt":0.3105962681194601,"score_spread":0.2834713318480856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121699755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6796718,0.00012974578,0.00053650065,0.00047643294,0.0007335775,0.00011310901,0.0000056808694,0.000047480793,0.31828564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99574596,0.000014278804,0.00022623509,0.00010571694,0.0033035774,0.0000020980785,0.0000014851063,0.000011458896,0.000589167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865896,0.00010876773,0.00030293348,0.00012217155,0.0005231901,0.00028398435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908364,0.00006156773,0.00025033977,0.000093001196,0.00035872715,0.00015270567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006544462,0.000082436476,0.00017158002,0.000048316808,0.0008864138,0.00023356528,0.00027708217,0.00007842489,0.00025292367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032579465,0.00007104358,0.000041438187,0.00024596008,0.00053693575,0.00070952676,0.000040213938,0.00013953504,0.00003814994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002296153,0.0005016658,0.008565024,0.00012007533,0.00019579976,0.00021839819,0.37130654,0.0000060781326,0.0059947567,0.5395128,0.015493795,0.057855446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011549934,0.0010863988,0.0040364973,0.00021443043,0.00006883776,0.00011784492,0.04454049,0.000017829278,0.0025889417,0.035872992,0.90977854,0.0005222175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01064137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013369332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8942847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054567452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021355243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121714131","doi":"","title":"Proportionality in the Criminal Law: The Differing American versus Canadian Approaches to Punishment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Proportionality (law); Statute; Political science; Law; Criminal justice; Constitution; Punishment (psychology); Criminal law; Charter; Criminal procedure; Theory of criminal justice; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.5830334374999637,"score_gpt":0.46388903905426315,"score_spread":0.11914439844570057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121714131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57033974,0.00010159788,0.000015708036,0.0830085,0.00015709053,0.0019931672,0.0000145196655,0.000012698868,0.34435698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99912935,0.000058145804,0.000016808777,0.0003303145,0.00012213444,0.00000738073,0.000004970799,0.000004984755,0.0003258861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960316,0.0014757683,0.0002025274,0.00033413953,0.0012951094,0.00066086964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982446,0.0006081034,0.00011260359,0.00043558385,0.00033074344,0.0002683596],"candidate_categories":["sts","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061471513,0.00012193768,0.000238854,0.00018388208,0.003368766,0.000981884,0.005447709,0.000052765416,0.00011679712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004110953,0.00007516645,0.00006510332,0.0020522932,0.0016231714,0.0011123748,0.000625124,0.00053181185,0.000022187885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082855445,0.00042793038,0.03968078,0.000056693985,0.00007473695,0.000086189204,0.15931943,0.000051079587,0.000016679338,0.76640785,0.0052245716,0.02782548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005010926,0.00020898688,0.34103048,0.00007282869,0.00002151526,7.701265e-7,0.12572126,0.000016344608,0.000039965424,0.0034776006,0.5286761,0.00023309323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9346335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9206465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7629303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050729414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014613628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121853942","doi":"","title":"'The Normal Ones Take Time': Civil Commitment and Sexual Assault in R. v. Alsadi","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Guard (computer science); Sexual assault; Involuntary commitment; Psychology; Civil rights; Security guard; Psychiatry; Power (physics); Criminology; Law; Political science; Medicine; Computer security; Medical emergency; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Mental health","score_opus":0.018599408638417875,"score_gpt":0.2765613553115887,"score_spread":0.25796194667317085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121853942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75219125,0.007761501,0.0000082337865,0.004259053,0.001025802,0.00060176855,0.000015948317,0.000116004776,0.23402043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98898876,0.00009630706,0.00003186473,0.00046570125,0.0011270324,0.000038156108,0.0000029311816,0.000012557801,0.009236688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981692,0.00027470803,0.00027216203,0.00018073704,0.0004884679,0.0006147677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913687,0.00022718644,0.000096019096,0.00016439527,0.00007244778,0.00030308048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016990924,0.00013236552,0.0001999818,0.000026145723,0.0010554211,0.0002509892,0.0002471819,0.00014310135,0.00022396057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023382668,0.00010178228,0.000030093748,0.0002190827,0.00032401088,0.0006568955,0.00007932042,0.00025240812,0.00034866176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010876835,0.0005309711,0.4275036,0.00011417349,0.00012021138,0.000021136006,0.020953253,0.0000116868,0.00090730446,0.45968655,0.07316913,0.016873224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003202221,0.000048666,0.022021586,0.000030622505,0.000011265184,0.0000021046806,0.0026935288,0.000006774619,0.00007697049,0.0009721401,0.9736142,0.00020192213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06039993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18281429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90044504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096213276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011552662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9458569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122093128","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1253","title":"Ordinary People, Necessary Choices: A Comparative Study of Childcare Expenses","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Legislature; Flexibility (engineering); Tax deduction; Context (archaeology); Baseline (sea); Variety (cybernetics); Public economics; Law and economics; Economics; Order (exchange); Actuarial science; Sociology; Political science; Law; Gross income; Tax reform; Computer science; Management; Finance; State income tax","score_opus":0.029280073424633273,"score_gpt":0.3613706878434686,"score_spread":0.3320906144188353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122093128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84597105,0.00010015639,0.00009868355,0.00029402802,0.00048990414,0.00049408444,0.000005643772,0.00005313814,0.15249331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99938,0.000010103179,0.000041685893,0.000111534166,0.00033989578,0.000047965783,0.0000022681274,0.00001147124,0.00005507726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981352,0.0003643628,0.0004112682,0.00027701666,0.00047030378,0.0003418489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987768,0.00055066723,0.00012213156,0.00025529118,0.0001751535,0.00011993499],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074563373,0.00015532202,0.00047747028,0.00006225798,0.0003748133,0.000079739286,0.000484176,0.00014822691,0.0006562799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035609963,0.00012818197,0.000049182687,0.00051488855,0.03286366,0.00035518408,0.00014608633,0.00036364485,0.000015988746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007255202,0.00045581354,0.008000316,0.000022041979,0.000014171921,0.0000053525177,0.11807438,0.0000019688873,0.00008380888,0.87310493,0.00006127741,0.00010337458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001610818,0.0012229157,0.0041518207,0.00017271348,0.000057595535,0.0000041267394,0.46089715,0.000024737417,0.0011603421,0.51902544,0.011022404,0.00064994884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00549637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020830277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35407954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020999485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000971426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122171275","doi":"","title":"“Natural Born” Disputes in the 2016 Presidential Election","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Presidential system; Political science; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Presidential election; Judicial review; Politics","score_opus":0.015105933032825125,"score_gpt":0.3169053765679362,"score_spread":0.30179944353511107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122171275","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00959298,0.5416978,0.0003856738,0.08706914,0.003200443,0.0038509474,0.000014778944,0.0002513659,0.35393688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9544837,0.04112944,0.000009324731,0.00160808,0.0007675614,0.0000740808,0.0000012512492,0.000006553442,0.0019199983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875325,0.00029990057,0.00023519456,0.00015145163,0.00031274377,0.00024747837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995278,0.00014543458,0.0000947027,0.00013486,0.00006201965,0.00003516069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011312884,0.000078546,0.00017763964,0.000014003791,0.00029448216,0.00006701153,0.00028958797,0.00004314887,0.00016946677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031426406,0.000036240508,0.00007927073,0.00027994846,0.00012508122,0.00043387525,0.000020655973,0.00007489434,0.00013301715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010393594,0.00006013163,0.000750286,0.0008564473,0.000017376013,0.000008630008,0.001173424,3.4453837e-8,0.00013178764,0.8060776,0.09676319,0.094150685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008406537,0.000017562252,0.000662114,0.0019937197,0.000014587801,0.0000018103682,0.00003727345,1.2900603e-7,0.000024429866,0.0054506348,0.99163544,0.00007825861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020119736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032852538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94489074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046893078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000942229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9864054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122242701","doi":"","title":"Judicial Settlement-Seeking in Parenting Cases: A Mock Trial","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Settlement (finance); Mediation; Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Dispute resolution; Best interests; Political science; Normative; Law; Alternative dispute resolution; Child custody; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.028284608529605966,"score_gpt":0.2990803392286651,"score_spread":0.27079573069905916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122242701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83275723,0.00043442965,0.000028831651,0.0015420023,0.0020080835,0.0015002087,0.000013784823,0.00017209617,0.16154335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99477273,0.000022411361,0.0000692115,0.00054719223,0.0030351097,0.00018143789,0.000007507801,0.00002072169,0.0013436966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744433,0.00029882716,0.00055815553,0.00037291253,0.00061469345,0.0007110907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990208,0.00020200298,0.00020249955,0.00018642636,0.00013061755,0.00025762504],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010656941,0.00017268077,0.00032935356,0.0000842486,0.0007949105,0.0005234201,0.00035106917,0.00016324416,0.0016760309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088327896,0.00017147693,0.00010061375,0.00050297345,0.0001643506,0.0009226363,0.00009201552,0.00030113402,0.00069673295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003349151,0.0016309114,0.1982696,0.0004771338,0.00028578052,0.00053032103,0.050314754,0.000115608535,0.0029998766,0.64772266,0.06772731,0.026576914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.031314906,0.00058170035,0.008289272,0.0008251099,0.00008054765,0.000008629807,0.028887138,0.00015207389,0.00026844392,0.052409306,0.87542176,0.0017610902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3515434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1657237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8076945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019358266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030931804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122587374","doi":"","title":"Accessing with Dinosaurs: Protecting Access to Government Information in the Cretaceous Period of Canadian Democracy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Government (linguistics); Freedom of information; Democracy; Accountability; Politics; Political science; Business; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.01441090964558543,"score_gpt":0.2706919971771945,"score_spread":0.25628108753160905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122587374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9476074,0.00024226739,0.0024348418,0.029374173,0.00009785569,0.0006120448,0.0000032931907,0.00001100061,0.019617107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993236,0.00018158132,0.000025347237,0.00019614243,0.0001825209,0.000013535839,1.0963729e-7,0.0000048918555,0.000072277566],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777955,0.00015576098,0.00025535974,0.00007570944,0.00060864346,0.0011249623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994438,0.000056617926,0.00022627844,0.00007205829,0.00010310786,0.000098109944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029893175,0.000076484095,0.000112863156,0.00015460623,0.00079182046,0.00036769878,0.00050061004,0.000044620378,0.000013443563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043907732,0.000040202893,0.000026113748,0.00068894756,0.00004935239,0.0017533746,0.000019903813,0.00045699134,0.0000038601656],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028786654,0.0000741085,0.08708555,0.00006148751,0.00012840563,0.000018121818,0.13919435,0.00012602605,0.0007747007,0.12898634,0.00024376204,0.64301926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029472741,0.0015092777,0.041146163,0.0020483288,0.000091528156,0.00037372138,0.55057055,0.000026562677,0.0011984031,0.08735388,0.31157,0.0011642984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17167722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6785928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016095778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043230597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83383864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123314778","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3157","title":"Musings and Silences of Chief Justice William Osgoode: Digest Marginalia about the Reception of Imperial Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Legislature; Political science; Government (linguistics); Philosophy","score_opus":0.029584433551938502,"score_gpt":0.31789449808654124,"score_spread":0.28831006453460273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123314778","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19582233,0.0012397778,0.000047123478,0.0025082927,0.0021106019,0.00023660324,0.000021013164,0.000017172888,0.79799706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99631995,0.0013570597,0.00013223631,0.00008642951,0.0018744424,0.0000030145625,7.393268e-7,0.000011595247,0.00021455332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824345,0.0002087767,0.00045403995,0.00017469322,0.0006116937,0.00030735045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981479,0.0001239894,0.0010255014,0.00022752078,0.0003340582,0.00014105497],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016478546,0.00013831507,0.00031671987,0.000025066574,0.0039430507,0.00044155377,0.00061452604,0.00013731566,0.00012161694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032922527,0.000095502146,0.0000982315,0.00007491833,0.0017901532,0.0009209916,0.000083132865,0.00026771575,0.0000038854255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008431291,0.00005964423,0.002582751,0.000120881916,0.000042959735,0.0000053896792,0.008055241,0.0000053773356,0.003728345,0.98300946,0.00028173783,0.002023899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004355638,0.0014144586,0.07038255,0.0037651255,0.0013524608,0.0002566646,0.028899977,0.000057951755,0.009563609,0.6823593,0.19604833,0.0015439268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3035543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30668664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8004976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003326701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013862523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123887407","doi":"","title":"Securing a Future for Children: the International Custom to Protect the Natural Family","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Natural (archaeology); Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.009500188083425908,"score_gpt":0.24445037008973752,"score_spread":0.23495018200631163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123887407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9084757,0.0010007984,0.0026101498,0.039219383,0.0014669875,0.0021719893,0.00004645388,0.00022467646,0.044783846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99179894,0.000019299978,0.00037654216,0.0008009076,0.0029362657,0.000055997923,0.0000098669,0.000020496349,0.0039817067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843895,0.00011391623,0.00018051064,0.0003051322,0.00048444056,0.00047707546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922216,0.00012975303,0.00013962026,0.00022074554,0.00019644463,0.00009126043],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065032014,0.0001673692,0.0001642544,0.000114932416,0.0016308964,0.00034772424,0.0010001395,0.00013319356,0.000028218583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009061673,0.0001167516,0.00016739396,0.00058866525,0.00016917681,0.0003690462,0.00012265291,0.00027903495,0.000024989753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045688177,0.00024384061,0.010860024,0.000081024686,0.00040557017,0.00006330422,0.048813313,0.0011282648,0.005389891,0.78243923,0.0922482,0.05787047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010347567,0.000112977694,0.09749566,0.00010206336,0.000093097675,0.00002449367,0.039210897,0.0012036682,0.0003721977,0.0064747925,0.8532736,0.0006018378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021975113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00768716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77596444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003560034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038900992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124012522","doi":"","title":"The Death Penalty, Mandatory Prison Sentences, and the Eighth Amendment's Rule against Cruel and Unusual Punishments","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Prison; Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Constitution; State (computer science); Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.018312038699929877,"score_gpt":0.2829163941783379,"score_spread":0.26460435547840805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124012522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15840812,0.011228423,0.000090770234,0.010021288,0.00073149346,0.00042123467,0.0000057250786,0.000037060512,0.8190559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833742,0.014038177,0.000039407067,0.0005852775,0.00072918803,0.000009276605,9.129074e-7,0.0000111603385,0.001212396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795246,0.0004195441,0.00032375494,0.00019610219,0.0006550755,0.0004530682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903584,0.00021045319,0.00026542004,0.00011742668,0.00012614304,0.00024470562],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022528325,0.00014956664,0.0002088041,0.00002430038,0.005458569,0.0012191698,0.0003561088,0.000078643636,0.000028959743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000086313325,0.00007944077,0.000060364615,0.00010886022,0.0008628548,0.00050328515,0.00010430567,0.00036013112,0.000008190153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001615035,0.00007096851,0.022456203,0.000016110353,0.00010977794,0.000069246824,0.0047901846,0.0000022532367,0.00003514435,0.95578325,0.0013193724,0.01518599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043982514,0.00017774937,0.0065582353,0.000288432,0.00014023986,0.00037496127,0.024395524,0.00009732188,0.00008020901,0.27171996,0.6912282,0.0005408969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046792045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08116358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8249661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000750236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012495593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124248368","doi":"","title":"The Loyalty of Lawyers: A Comment on 3464920 Canada Inc. v. Strother","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Loyalty; Business; Political science; Management; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.0363073417879423,"score_gpt":0.2781827264901342,"score_spread":0.2418753847021919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124248368","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001977468,0.113602534,8.2377056e-7,0.54689956,0.00051382487,0.0016170986,0.00007318843,0.000017620865,0.3352979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9324045,0.027120097,0.0000019230176,0.038126063,0.00019691975,0.000031322274,0.0000017662252,0.000010625165,0.002106793],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987448,0.0002846881,0.00021176392,0.00008983643,0.0003717359,0.00029720212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991858,0.0001357018,0.000107054395,0.0002472471,0.00010091892,0.00022325962],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008788779,0.00007894808,0.00019186013,0.000010721766,0.0015310518,0.00002217437,0.00044745623,0.000028639464,0.00025079376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021545436,0.000043022505,0.000041451716,0.00019764053,0.00027303584,0.000029737796,0.000011767804,0.00011460312,0.000036318797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021846424,0.0000058609826,0.00042036077,0.00016848052,0.00002587748,0.00000975346,0.001067069,0.0000013988658,1.9020543e-7,0.12030969,0.8716938,0.006295328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003419096,0.0000129829195,0.0002403305,0.000426354,0.000010181484,0.0000010365878,0.00021274615,4.2384872e-7,0.000002029386,0.00012826695,0.998874,0.00005745519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99950564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99990594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.930427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047768795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045850137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124396383","doi":"10.29173/alr438","title":"Misusing the \"No Duty\" Doctrine in Tort Decisions: Following the Restatement (Third) of Torts Would Yield Better Decisions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Duty; Tort; Supreme court; Law; Duty of care; Political science; Law and economics; Liability; Economics","score_opus":0.05400105752533564,"score_gpt":0.34799846423620323,"score_spread":0.2939974067108676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124396383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13646685,0.21319023,0.00016503812,0.23462856,0.0029557843,0.0050824047,0.000008889757,0.000057150082,0.4074451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94023246,0.050844472,0.000049815833,0.0065204953,0.00028147662,0.0000929806,7.908652e-7,0.0000146002985,0.0019629067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757713,0.00033839734,0.00080336817,0.00026994795,0.0006534195,0.0003577305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939133,0.005095846,0.00025359707,0.00051864947,0.00013477629,0.00008383749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028196785,0.00014891989,0.00042371923,0.000024837667,0.0005456728,0.00006444245,0.0006054063,0.00010625051,0.00028500237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007052108,0.00006331068,0.00022676455,0.00050173135,0.00019116062,0.00031333746,0.00012988418,0.00018260001,0.00010964348],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065912245,0.000338137,0.023286419,0.00070742844,0.00030061815,0.00007038054,0.007924752,0.0000022455458,0.0007030113,0.47000456,0.106940545,0.389656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012126573,0.000020839398,0.00034710162,0.01167631,0.00005346299,0.0000011041947,0.00010848938,2.4167068e-7,0.00004261607,0.0022354978,0.9852754,0.000117711425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08819239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11125167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8783348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007739336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015898971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9178794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124604407","doi":"","title":"Balancing Competing Priorities: Affirmative Action in the United States and Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Dissenting opinion; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Law and economics; Promotion (chess); Race (biology); Public administration; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.009899411710128722,"score_gpt":0.27175180293503837,"score_spread":0.26185239122490966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124604407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98869914,0.0011826596,0.00011863291,0.0076704524,0.00009202052,0.00008755587,7.0277923e-7,0.000008108702,0.002140702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99542505,0.0037719016,0.0000036077936,0.00045270968,0.00027599055,7.9477076e-7,0.000001258504,0.00000240517,0.00006630446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844253,0.00025157182,0.00014776703,0.000063709645,0.00027487674,0.000819566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963653,0.00013934704,0.0000997004,0.00002732334,0.000062006424,0.000035066318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021057029,0.000057369034,0.00008709976,0.00004965582,0.0006803736,0.000121679586,0.000121225035,0.000027245302,0.0000028887325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001307336,0.00004170673,0.000012072309,0.0002507133,0.000036861427,0.00020270393,0.0000042234906,0.00069965597,3.1190433e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010420659,0.00009837422,0.048203222,0.000050125916,0.00010909731,0.000042344993,0.25249213,0.00063023984,0.0001636284,0.6296927,0.0012186102,0.067195326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035256232,0.00014765208,0.006910195,0.00009211084,0.000010556096,0.00006388055,0.865129,0.00014203011,0.000011467891,0.09540284,0.031577904,0.00015983751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9356406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9922467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6126368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009109958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031031785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5504905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124877502","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005634","title":"Professor Raz, the Rule of Law, and the <i>Tobacco Act</i>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Legislation; Rule of law; Statutory interpretation; Charter; Damages; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.012557742456289472,"score_gpt":0.26976392151120326,"score_spread":0.2572061790549138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124877502","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49546796,0.016639134,0.00003393883,0.050439138,0.0014418561,0.000629712,0.000025684853,0.000012192494,0.43531036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99707675,0.00009652534,0.000024585821,0.0014734695,0.0007230823,0.0000032979262,1.7314034e-7,0.0000074484956,0.0005946699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856156,0.0002413204,0.00039981568,0.000092392394,0.00038868544,0.00031624213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985935,0.00030765045,0.0004053226,0.00013996489,0.0003238369,0.00022968769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018242849,0.00009147674,0.00024563167,0.000031394626,0.0010746819,0.00019771825,0.00060269766,0.00007750323,0.00004177584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017510836,0.00005130367,0.00008686257,0.00019311019,0.0020489541,0.00036290448,0.000017355873,0.00024841272,0.000004330222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022872706,0.000008352349,0.0025533447,0.000016995564,0.00001800611,0.000024473478,0.009078321,0.000005744418,0.000058325182,0.9845692,0.0032057324,0.0004386518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006112674,0.000046664114,0.002656789,0.00022337933,0.00005706358,0.000034633442,0.0021890134,0.0000014119306,0.00056357175,0.03945148,0.9540245,0.0001402141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6148209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7598356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9508188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006332918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013793255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82656926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124898474","doi":"","title":"Flip-Top Not Distinctive of Philip Morris, Rules Federal Court of Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Federal court; Political science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.015592420227016028,"score_gpt":0.266079163632439,"score_spread":0.250486743405423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124898474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.942392,0.0031984837,0.0005519229,0.0038267882,0.0007881662,0.00018819906,0.000030909654,0.000014354547,0.049009196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971346,0.00031123954,0.000013450155,0.00004159355,0.00064464816,0.00000173452,0.0000014847228,0.000009266019,0.0018419699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973961,0.00015947831,0.0003553337,0.000120667915,0.00079693645,0.0011714906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987863,0.00007013314,0.00037371647,0.00008048102,0.0005079362,0.0001814385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023510056,0.00010013037,0.00028020638,0.000042593078,0.0003470988,0.000030809286,0.00030424487,0.00006577391,0.000035566518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055272516,0.0000863758,0.00006659468,0.00017523995,0.0001648948,0.00019135031,0.000024944875,0.0005507553,0.0000028829443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005590995,0.00030050307,0.05705213,0.00007161285,0.000619888,0.000020830003,0.01792732,0.00015990985,0.00058996456,0.89132184,0.014572638,0.01680429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033351358,0.0011732571,0.0077362293,0.0002730317,0.00017175649,0.00014274781,0.22459283,0.00009293569,0.0031457613,0.62354016,0.13477677,0.0010194052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87121177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.951236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26778167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013484617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027687361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97782475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125079091","doi":"","title":"TWU Law: A Reply to Proponents of Approval","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Law; Supreme court; Lesbian; Opposition (politics); Sociology; Dignity; Statutory law; Political science; Politics; Gender studies","score_opus":0.01765990161242735,"score_gpt":0.279456748126513,"score_spread":0.26179684651408563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125079091","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22898252,0.00018189245,0.0003391253,0.0037215156,0.00091569143,0.00080571574,0.000009990202,0.00018395872,0.7648596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918795,0.0000046730343,0.00048549357,0.002677566,0.0009903428,0.000036283735,0.0000017830372,0.00001639543,0.0039079674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815625,0.00020008888,0.00033560515,0.000316202,0.00060983235,0.00038201234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989675,0.0000670956,0.0001414733,0.00029577193,0.00020269855,0.00032542064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011661048,0.00012156377,0.0002831173,0.000035477944,0.0004520454,0.000119014934,0.00039489876,0.00009731569,0.0001599905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059087155,0.00010944466,0.00008046625,0.00031871427,0.0002527135,0.00032195786,0.00007786737,0.00013937731,0.00040274952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003500803,0.00008318594,0.0017043818,0.00007845195,0.000017924138,0.0000022511504,0.002663904,0.0000072388198,0.0011260062,0.98771524,0.0053055226,0.001260908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002531514,0.000117819305,0.0004082129,0.00009382513,0.000011379831,6.589301e-7,0.00050013006,0.000004694446,0.0017438761,0.011466979,0.9852149,0.00018437744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.187856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02847299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97990936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006127193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014208816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98925483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125212540","doi":"10.24926/26390742.1993","title":"Originalism and Its Discontents (Plus a Thought or Two About Abortion)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional commentary","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centennial College","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Constitutionalism; Constitution; Meaning (existential); Fidelity; Epistemology; Original meaning; Argument (complex analysis); Epiphenomenon; Thought experiment; Interpretation (philosophy); Soundness; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science; Democracy; Politics; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07849300993930311,"score_gpt":0.3629534299588191,"score_spread":0.284460420019516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125212540","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57180524,0.012650484,0.00831212,0.060424376,0.006004132,0.0019435324,0.00029203182,0.00040040762,0.3381677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919559,0.00017794274,0.00012911214,0.005456572,0.0010860557,0.000012600099,0.00002593317,0.0000041217536,0.0011518096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987897,0.00006676244,0.00025264293,0.00020071007,0.00038675655,0.0003034145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993557,0.00016775011,0.00008288624,0.00006771466,0.00013035814,0.00019562013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007144679,0.00011134538,0.00015516768,0.000058634687,0.0010744986,0.000087744644,0.00015036359,0.000053356212,0.00027677335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010696333,0.000090774585,0.00003701544,0.00022440276,0.00086814235,0.0005165631,0.000052614738,0.00012311776,0.000037854632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011370143,0.000052584077,0.011813108,0.00002016137,0.00003518778,0.0000644163,0.0009775251,0.000002271823,0.000051254705,0.97610766,0.009258443,0.0015036882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000950165,0.000028735,0.003099744,0.00011494862,0.00002771712,0.000022054008,0.0014393276,0.00001245511,0.00010420277,0.0021724226,0.9918277,0.00020048524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064107347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008608127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9825693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019965108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004162939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96911556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125276268","doi":"","title":"Family Law Reform in (Neoliberal) Context: British Columbia's New Family Law Act","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Law reform; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.00918706077473235,"score_gpt":0.24559867625893814,"score_spread":0.23641161548420578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125276268","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42233485,0.0073792106,0.0002463462,0.001685299,0.0008046517,0.0003322603,0.0000035274415,0.000105758925,0.5671081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770573,0.0022912312,0.000016368233,0.0025811957,0.0017964487,0.000006242151,0.000001970696,0.000031837004,0.01621742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99551105,0.00029260738,0.0005313069,0.00030257183,0.00065170234,0.0027107703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990781,0.00006970832,0.00024579698,0.0001500186,0.0001560977,0.0003002603],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034105706,0.0001527611,0.0004075597,0.000042928583,0.0010884146,0.0011235087,0.0005779892,0.00022260967,0.000062830106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010319842,0.00019754986,0.00014849102,0.00037397913,0.0002704032,0.00085205067,0.000043899632,0.0016483099,0.0000608269],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002550509,0.00006500689,0.0017976654,0.000009935178,0.000050860053,0.000014000586,0.0018503361,0.000002349082,0.00007987544,0.9251187,0.0017591575,0.06922665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010839122,0.00026468578,0.002077208,0.00013796384,0.000016573327,0.00007252099,0.0065941736,0.000004893949,0.0000044462736,0.5256411,0.46378362,0.00031892085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96185875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.993916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5547224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002399919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040965443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125408551","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1219","title":"\"Constitutional Chicken\": National Security Confidentiality and Terrorism Prosecutions after R. v. Ahmad","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Constitutional right; Legislation; Confidentiality; Jury; Parliament; Secrecy; Terrorism; National security; Politics","score_opus":0.04501341516142714,"score_gpt":0.31891517556036436,"score_spread":0.2739017603989372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125408551","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003968073,0.09713564,0.00024642932,0.0040110457,0.0009804367,0.0016089332,0.00017910019,0.0001568058,0.89171356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907928,0.0067741815,0.000067649096,0.0016472253,0.00039169227,0.00012326788,0.00001328103,0.0000043633095,0.00018553021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830127,0.00022325694,0.00035485235,0.00027547326,0.00059489097,0.00025027347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991155,0.00003447131,0.00011882828,0.00012290974,0.00044623244,0.00016204224],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013932809,0.00013023797,0.00026930874,0.00001679616,0.0006056908,0.00007250223,0.00016942313,0.000098526165,0.001527903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002208615,0.00011736644,0.00009368266,0.00017692818,0.0014482079,0.00050837244,0.000056625933,0.00015661764,0.000096758275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050680287,0.000054145996,0.0010169273,0.00050823996,0.000021735721,0.0000031921456,0.0015168535,8.7955945e-9,0.0000026384569,0.9943121,0.0024171162,0.00014199274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012430736,0.000013822446,0.001092455,0.0009891682,0.000057478428,0.000008704051,0.00011938403,7.522329e-7,0.0000116549245,0.056892466,0.94049996,0.00018984189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013472558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010206113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98682475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068628215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004000039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125879772","doi":"","title":"Can a Court Change the Law by Saying Nothing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Patentable subject matter; Law; Nothing; Majority opinion; Quarter (Canadian coin); Concurring opinion; Supreme Court Decisions; Political science; Certiorari; Intellectual property; Original jurisdiction; Patent law; History; Patentability; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04920999125744193,"score_gpt":0.31889411836985154,"score_spread":0.26968412711240963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125879772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00945159,0.00032609614,0.00009740043,0.063761495,0.0005581508,0.00023371335,0.0000036015247,0.00011018337,0.9254578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986973,0.0000224354,0.000020003268,0.008492572,0.002052229,0.000014592176,3.8641224e-7,0.000005333544,0.0024194391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992946,0.000052489606,0.000082341656,0.00010255708,0.00024466764,0.00022333664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997036,0.00004633083,0.000038513128,0.00007656891,0.00007841526,0.000056592467],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053910055,0.000048151553,0.00006735918,0.000007657162,0.0013890184,0.00016476917,0.00019607539,0.00004532379,0.00031385644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057570734,0.000029891698,0.000020773974,0.00015040817,0.00033237034,0.00018967983,0.000027495613,0.000058432946,0.000073651914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002379006,0.000012702989,0.00057551544,0.0000070035144,0.000009475318,8.6395687e-7,0.1907255,1.6948846e-8,0.00018275273,0.7548966,0.050027974,0.0035592206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004170361,0.00001652913,0.000035283545,0.000014224412,0.000003680871,2.2893147e-7,0.013323758,0.000009517502,0.00025493323,0.001895375,0.98433685,0.00006791483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45785356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18575375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9775214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027448341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047605536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126088849","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1019","title":"Correlativity, Personality, and the Emerging Consensus on Corrective Justice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personality; Psychology; Economic Justice; Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.028136906328389607,"score_gpt":0.3426470481351979,"score_spread":0.3145101418068083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126088849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15160857,0.00041879155,0.0025395367,0.020984955,0.0010521669,0.00041802463,0.000004194536,0.00007202769,0.8229017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997584,0.000080899,0.000013768601,0.0015189574,0.00042573793,0.000014637207,4.4361192e-7,0.000008568855,0.00035299768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811685,0.00079910975,0.00020156895,0.000211439,0.00035212818,0.00031893063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99641484,0.0032410175,0.0000597511,0.00011658116,0.00008200672,0.00008579043],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020722533,0.000113743576,0.00023468758,0.000026060314,0.00078332314,0.000116623465,0.00016892786,0.00010223544,0.00024856694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020045626,0.000076291224,0.000038861926,0.00027762042,0.096879765,0.00008654746,0.00008592375,0.00029197338,0.000025431102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003235993,0.00003178675,0.000635261,0.00001091214,0.0000097376505,0.000010615041,0.02943283,0.0000071314867,9.329245e-7,0.9687384,0.00024101642,0.0005578189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007636399,0.00006474703,0.00013053144,0.00008767892,0.000049717095,0.000009158202,0.02378194,0.00023858609,0.000011793093,0.96178186,0.012920803,0.00015957294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020654413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094270485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8459754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005752448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000562951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.905578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127324697","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Law: Provincial & Territory Legislation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Political science; Public administration; Business","score_opus":0.023655803917817526,"score_gpt":0.2663762862219683,"score_spread":0.24272048230415078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127324697","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009232455,0.0014987803,0.0000094695915,0.020679772,0.003848764,0.0006621017,0.00025693586,0.00042590967,0.97260904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16760175,0.0007941447,0.0004870325,0.031089712,0.09292031,0.00012341575,0.0012083681,0.00024121677,0.70553404],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975767,0.00020207047,0.0004772283,0.00047519855,0.00067517936,0.0005936285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873567,0.00008171307,0.00021300126,0.0001852561,0.00009863862,0.00068574847],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002823922,0.00027406143,0.00041851503,0.00015612064,0.00107565,0.00075957115,0.0007022695,0.0007480542,0.0020985147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024184372,0.00026447105,0.00014705105,0.00029875827,0.0002972732,0.0012272748,0.00007348529,0.00042650712,0.00038941932],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030457986,0.0000052744235,0.00010976135,0.00006380181,0.000018492286,0.00002661391,0.0024190345,2.065757e-7,7.5139934e-7,0.15641122,0.83859795,0.0023438637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006629831,0.000028939327,0.00001783442,0.00014069706,0.000023080625,4.248768e-7,0.00093424664,0.0000028202567,0.000007838618,0.003289474,0.9951344,0.00035393288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9914605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98993194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26707497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002971055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010691586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127551180","doi":"","title":"Legal Ethics and Canada's Military Lawyers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Legislature; History","score_opus":0.014285994276415151,"score_gpt":0.2670874063036218,"score_spread":0.2528014120272067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127551180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6428542,0.0023081487,0.00000359821,0.008518781,0.0012979344,0.0003132823,0.000019683936,0.000077825905,0.34460655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874854,0.00012414108,0.000048175985,0.0034401985,0.00051210343,0.0000064258174,0.0000030188007,0.000012359038,0.00836816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834496,0.00023272542,0.00018687229,0.0002710154,0.00059205625,0.0003723815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991228,0.00024030663,0.000046574012,0.00016869088,0.000121618315,0.00030002993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009685543,0.00011439987,0.000196806,0.000017952434,0.0007779718,0.00009946115,0.00022197304,0.00017674894,0.00035581065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039044392,0.00010988883,0.00003424397,0.00013247802,0.00021616244,0.0003994135,0.000051263625,0.000547061,0.000108907145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028976405,0.000028289229,0.036075514,0.00018282073,0.000044003824,0.00003755339,0.0051040826,0.000020550911,0.00020405422,0.9309768,0.026778402,0.00051893335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018473002,0.000025916923,0.0018239461,0.000047670488,0.000007667637,0.0000014603676,0.0035684886,0.000004469111,0.000053468495,0.0013473568,0.9927522,0.00018260416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9979472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9659738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015539733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017151007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5983609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128694934","doi":"","title":"Choosing Affordable Health Insurance","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Medicaid; Actuarial science; Business; Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Health care; Psychological intervention; Self-insurance; Group insurance; Insurance policy; Public economics; Health insurance; Income protection insurance; General insurance; Economics; Political science; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.0212316036586312,"score_gpt":0.298144125575376,"score_spread":0.2769125219167448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128694934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42410195,0.0751749,0.03380585,0.31372678,0.0021352884,0.0010212978,0.000010191046,0.0005621382,0.1494616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893558,0.006381034,0.000040974395,0.0017134319,0.0018001435,0.0000016410665,4.2589494e-7,0.000012033587,0.00069450657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971364,0.00015735932,0.00023579798,0.0001386647,0.00036506724,0.0019666834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941635,0.000023488657,0.00018606274,0.000046291254,0.000076761375,0.00025104504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019107072,0.000082289895,0.00017894816,0.000027104108,0.0011853846,0.0001441646,0.00026008522,0.000047278507,0.000034769266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019520079,0.00007500216,0.000064566564,0.00036998114,0.000059676342,0.00039053432,0.000015990205,0.0009942582,0.000051938645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054927248,0.000052655312,0.015296683,0.000042656655,0.00008159731,0.0000047338353,0.022026626,0.000046381105,0.00013672766,0.8504929,0.0027447178,0.109019384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010031213,0.0007709096,0.0012820236,0.00012131429,0.000010118982,0.00005784537,0.04461466,0.000038379112,0.000056291676,0.31344727,0.63813436,0.00046374428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068724365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011180117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6353896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070653716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069279424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133561944","doi":"","title":"Tending the Bar: The \"Good Character\" Requirementfor Law Society Admission","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Law; Bar (unit); Political science; Geography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.029853419716642154,"score_gpt":0.31755118244864583,"score_spread":0.28769776273200365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133561944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0771498,0.0021405332,0.0011727181,0.03976625,0.0046635536,0.00078400504,0.0000113288625,0.00019446849,0.8741174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890654,0.00026202478,0.00006789751,0.0041041123,0.0054897573,0.0000036852045,0.0000011949691,0.000018528399,0.000987406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976717,0.00018346346,0.0004217435,0.00016259153,0.00090919464,0.00065130217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988229,0.00024737584,0.0003272815,0.00017940282,0.00017830597,0.00024473565],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006213559,0.00013919934,0.00016616879,0.000011334988,0.008335572,0.0006933052,0.0006613857,0.00012337965,0.00031877356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000108525055,0.00007049493,0.00022362295,0.00024891327,0.00048569118,0.000634274,0.00008415905,0.0005827478,0.000043132997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003350009,0.00007108914,0.0011007003,0.000017665952,0.000085167674,0.000029879564,0.032153018,0.0000022699744,0.0012776353,0.94785804,0.008624888,0.008746145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002136051,0.000037934784,0.0006143093,0.00007138984,0.00003058553,0.00003986729,0.011741459,0.000005170287,0.00039963156,0.005639657,0.9810772,0.00012921389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009587156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016991649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9724523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001374813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016065598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3140242985","doi":"10.29173/alr512","title":"Recent Judicial Developments of Interest to Oil and Gas Lawyers","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Energy law; Fossil fuel; Law; Business; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Environmental law; Engineering; Computer science; Waste management","score_opus":0.06734845769902215,"score_gpt":0.3369462035963154,"score_spread":0.26959774589729324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3140242985","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031062556,0.06581961,0.0000021598426,0.02785141,0.00043157648,0.00029104305,0.0000017595021,0.00002073692,0.87451917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4772954,0.51214236,0.00007587583,0.00684267,0.0002185688,0.000033198092,0.0000030220854,0.000013623209,0.0033752888],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898213,0.00010328931,0.00033001482,0.00018149515,0.00017987774,0.00022320141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993958,0.00010271284,0.000109047854,0.00010372768,0.00012441173,0.00016428737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049545144,0.00009370467,0.00031981932,0.000018737974,0.00019099162,0.000028972863,0.00017675855,0.000046288118,0.00027373727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005171994,0.00008013464,0.00003516659,0.00037706838,0.00012378223,0.00013225162,0.000058061556,0.000053586187,0.000095545205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000139075355,0.000051977087,0.0015208464,0.00095609936,0.000036268477,0.000004753346,0.0026174397,5.3184422e-8,0.000021341846,0.28213567,0.0071702665,0.7054714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000679652,0.000021261552,0.00008119521,0.002565371,0.000021386426,0.0000019200208,0.00007044503,4.5504912e-8,0.000016103495,0.00039665983,0.9966562,0.0001014701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.088847354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27061772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9894859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040242547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011214772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9172201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142173966","doi":"10.29173/alr354","title":"Recent Judicial Developments of Interest to Oil and Gas Lawyers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Creditor; Energy law; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Fossil fuel; Judicial review; Judicial opinion; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Environmental law; Finance; Engineering","score_opus":0.1103150384777167,"score_gpt":0.35085352382388235,"score_spread":0.24053848534616565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3142173966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01715668,0.07885774,0.0000018562034,0.026302895,0.00063536514,0.0002998096,0.0000024161752,0.000020828093,0.8767224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7564041,0.22893943,0.00020853973,0.009968818,0.0003853791,0.000055420525,0.0000057045254,0.000023009514,0.0040096147],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898595,0.0001233424,0.00031140802,0.00016724256,0.00021559744,0.00019648265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924093,0.000081235135,0.000109773915,0.00010122776,0.00020328691,0.00026353865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074970705,0.00008822873,0.00031789177,0.000016731361,0.00011732399,0.00002898167,0.00017661422,0.000044865217,0.00007622532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00097225443,0.000074082054,0.000028050976,0.00029847008,0.00012600195,0.00013765889,0.00007051301,0.000050197523,0.00010426457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018495117,0.000059910333,0.0009413525,0.001277733,0.00004466128,0.0000031048341,0.007413932,9.970421e-8,0.000012182466,0.44759938,0.02884266,0.5137865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008892133,0.000028828781,0.000022614317,0.0021174832,0.000020626832,8.956422e-7,0.00014666916,5.0789424e-8,0.000020865884,0.00064708124,0.9968098,0.00009617497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09633107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2107553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96796715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053853957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023189404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90968657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3147754447","doi":"","title":"Easements, Errors, and Energy Projects: Shelf Holdings Revisited","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Easement; CLARITY; Appeal; Law; Confusion; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Business; Political science; Engineering; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.00860961904611829,"score_gpt":0.25492887073728954,"score_spread":0.24631925169117125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3147754447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8636017,0.04375818,0.00055308687,0.0045366087,0.000815041,0.00040027098,0.0000042772263,0.00014409369,0.08618679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9760294,0.012446976,0.00001250638,0.00025155907,0.00062408875,0.0000037288175,0.0000016346478,0.000014441636,0.010615694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743474,0.00014325525,0.00023404023,0.00020921788,0.00041828153,0.0015604729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994551,0.000032028045,0.00018097498,0.00008813131,0.000120145916,0.00012365238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020420137,0.000117437616,0.00019527027,0.00009277388,0.00053141266,0.00018993951,0.00022379278,0.000091341906,0.000092660164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000114063645,0.00010069399,0.000057574125,0.0003139371,0.00007114489,0.00047333218,0.00003461789,0.00058628875,0.000027152368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032761465,0.000035685585,0.015516215,0.000022433864,0.00009389007,0.0000030565773,0.0022199457,7.770987e-7,0.0003680773,0.9677293,0.0007625849,0.013215297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011716055,0.0005378136,0.0007353043,0.00021795939,0.00006380422,0.00009891936,0.025894558,0.000021184214,0.000083340274,0.20261055,0.7680548,0.0005101802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008383743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052018506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7672922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050108775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018826604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3148053063","doi":"10.29173/mlj784","title":"The Many Facets of Cook v. Lewis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"History; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.01490434989745106,"score_gpt":0.27859002118797693,"score_spread":0.2636856712905259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3148053063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56841207,0.0005393296,0.000080118654,0.003908111,0.0035611652,0.00016754397,0.0000028423285,0.000030565698,0.42329827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976588,0.00009533226,0.00003812948,0.00010989948,0.0017399163,0.0000018289962,1.0083294e-7,0.0000065993545,0.00034939832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889684,0.0000956056,0.00024236602,0.00006934617,0.00043817327,0.00025769186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992509,0.00011083342,0.00019654376,0.00010178962,0.00022542023,0.00011450975],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012152317,0.00006301035,0.00011396221,0.000017315964,0.0023335256,0.00029438068,0.0003988029,0.00007557044,0.00012819398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016434595,0.000040534527,0.00006989072,0.00010487529,0.0004543504,0.00021704183,0.000029668221,0.00038842755,0.000044304634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019461017,0.000044897937,0.0038393647,0.000011339285,0.00003829026,0.000014225004,0.0032238523,0.0000015396404,0.002388967,0.94409686,0.007563824,0.0387574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015503098,0.000030527484,0.001458885,0.000017667384,0.00001042685,0.000024598754,0.016784599,0.0000021218384,0.0007531161,0.021380031,0.9593028,0.00008023004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0824509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65318286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95173895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025624156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011601154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156576711","doi":"10.29173/alr2644","title":"Mental Illness and Professional Regulation: The Duty to Report a Fellow Lawyer to the Law Society","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Duty; Mental illness; Political science; Psychology; Psychiatry; Mental health","score_opus":0.01958376856903326,"score_gpt":0.32950541519407395,"score_spread":0.3099216466250407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156576711","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006513587,0.054242097,0.00001545951,0.6328997,0.0017223947,0.0025809745,0.0000082085435,0.000035426732,0.30198216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84636563,0.005964561,0.0000910802,0.0941518,0.0011711386,0.00031302797,0.000018781144,0.00002059091,0.051903374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984782,0.00027571787,0.00029693655,0.00028088348,0.0004503626,0.00021794678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906564,0.00023354971,0.000099310295,0.0003008813,0.00017528444,0.00012531532],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012959893,0.00010602572,0.0002312892,0.000001982566,0.0018913168,0.00013601722,0.00021690068,0.000053404172,0.00039714767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002735269,0.000056190485,0.00011084309,0.0004037118,0.00018597567,0.00016281482,0.00015825327,0.00010167563,0.00007923311],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032951618,0.000031265918,0.0002023027,0.00034369537,0.00003897059,0.00000772217,0.013759806,5.231868e-7,0.00002369514,0.7984905,0.18401305,0.0030851213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004055166,0.000006391778,0.00018136136,0.00095121487,0.00003257232,0.000024737523,0.00097006233,7.733018e-7,0.000034082626,0.00062468974,0.9970252,0.00010836747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040519554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18638568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83985204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004032373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018517957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99940807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157772177","doi":"","title":"Introduction to the Law and Markets: Regulating Controversial Exchange","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Refugee law; Law; Human rights; Refugee; Sovereignty; Variety (cybernetics); Criminal law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.009186826359915088,"score_gpt":0.2715300291001338,"score_spread":0.2623432027402187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157772177","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22589904,0.008535993,0.0023184153,0.5291799,0.0047575803,0.0009442187,0.0000042146703,0.000086704145,0.22827396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98274916,0.00087115396,0.000010115589,0.0003339811,0.012299956,0.0000033676965,1.6252709e-7,0.00000653533,0.0037255557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983907,0.00013260993,0.00012338928,0.00013194456,0.00026009805,0.00096125517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994709,0.00003918823,0.0001768061,0.00014234295,0.00009076937,0.00007999614],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038618366,0.000065732835,0.000103287006,0.000020893567,0.0045208824,0.0005535162,0.0002980346,0.000047996044,0.000035030283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006082767,0.000046750985,0.00003448574,0.00004727926,0.00017240415,0.00046479126,0.000049688544,0.0004890999,0.000011761947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006555602,0.000007412928,0.0003459154,0.0000040345353,0.000038748163,7.1766095e-7,0.0036449288,0.0000012684678,0.00006415745,0.95730126,0.0034989063,0.0350271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000365473,0.00010286645,0.00085955276,0.00001871503,0.000022524331,0.000038432143,0.011018719,0.00000702296,0.000016470365,0.09383531,0.89360136,0.0001135699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011546461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09735058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89010245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033140188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048998004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158902389","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3827342","title":"The Perplexities of Patent Prosecution History: Procedure over Principle?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Patent law; Economics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.025030601107359246,"score_gpt":0.2767984386898429,"score_spread":0.25176783758248367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158902389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8542709,0.09419161,0.00035111466,0.0066524297,0.0021665362,0.00046456346,0.0000031148468,0.000066412074,0.041833352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97847396,0.007321327,0.0000046677037,0.000049136554,0.0007822504,0.000007513468,7.8447533e-7,0.000008760073,0.013351605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787635,0.00017319618,0.00025005025,0.00011656085,0.00050196203,0.0010818782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915975,0.000045389832,0.00023355082,0.000087968634,0.00041608073,0.000057253266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019447214,0.00008364743,0.00013840332,0.000024318739,0.0007691064,0.000067354886,0.00020530744,0.00006864666,0.00005731514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005156455,0.00005446533,0.00010156791,0.00015385284,0.0002031654,0.00020544109,0.00002592136,0.00062885066,0.0000044019957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002394912,0.000038933915,0.002791446,0.00001959695,0.00005860133,0.0000017510956,0.005459106,0.0000025003158,0.00026646483,0.9887166,0.00068483566,0.0019362124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036695696,0.0001617033,0.0017134355,0.00007989944,0.000037436854,0.00005589402,0.04283235,0.0000105726185,0.00029598566,0.24850059,0.70576924,0.00017594144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016563864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031792507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.740216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001915855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013619014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99197286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160819707","doi":"","title":"Regulating Energy Innovation: US Responses to Hydraulic Fracturing, Wastewater Injection and Induced Seismicity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Hydraulic fracturing; Induced seismicity; Corporate governance; State (computer science); Business; Environmental planning; Engineering; Political science; Petroleum engineering; Civil engineering; Environmental science; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.021456006462347323,"score_gpt":0.3026793241869373,"score_spread":0.28122331772459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160819707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877735,0.00018805201,0.00063074456,0.00515599,0.00033168533,0.00008132043,4.0513098e-7,0.000030165214,0.005808163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99501663,0.00015230225,0.000022701915,0.00047088118,0.0014627622,0.0000045853267,3.9057653e-7,0.00001271137,0.0028570208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979893,0.00015687046,0.0002731909,0.00019229946,0.0003245202,0.0010638095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991773,0.000037163412,0.00034687674,0.00015016863,0.00019870707,0.00008983311],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002428217,0.00010980118,0.00015563109,0.0001659711,0.003137094,0.0005634889,0.00026412803,0.00011681997,0.000009397006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007175636,0.00009787807,0.00002981932,0.00020322314,0.000075981974,0.00072956353,0.00006774074,0.000607905,0.0000044182025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005748859,0.00009530787,0.08384322,0.000032172626,0.00025454734,0.000015474792,0.018324172,0.000095581614,0.015754608,0.62466854,0.0006389296,0.25570258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015397614,0.0013310381,0.07619136,0.00031903785,0.00006159109,0.0004050087,0.01359897,0.00007772447,0.014351277,0.63747865,0.2535709,0.0010746967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0390871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01953408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25462788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048982416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013243076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161990443","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Law: Saskatchewan","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.024403731915836745,"score_gpt":0.26978527091254517,"score_spread":0.24538153899670842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161990443","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000006292699,0.0025338798,0.000003922468,0.03742282,0.0022985402,0.00038844458,0.00025245344,0.00045915737,0.95663446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.078669876,0.00097639585,0.00040942157,0.04613459,0.01795594,0.00003734192,0.00038059507,0.00013894592,0.8552969],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975595,0.00016801301,0.0004473503,0.0004892787,0.0006012577,0.00073463185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826336,0.0001114876,0.00016096736,0.00023551915,0.00009431298,0.0011343599],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026545022,0.00029417608,0.0005187574,0.00012570989,0.0009932894,0.0007851429,0.0009765555,0.000739045,0.0074332072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019397194,0.0002733646,0.00017450874,0.0005070304,0.0003294769,0.000684257,0.0000926468,0.00045925876,0.0010425652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013281541,0.000003828109,0.000055215198,0.00008199138,0.000028886749,0.000047295965,0.006008564,1.17487474e-7,3.2148125e-7,0.12612861,0.8667341,0.00090975343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049346538,0.000020267033,0.000004318876,0.00012922453,0.00002309932,5.2507073e-7,0.00989891,5.1363486e-7,0.000011726346,0.006686597,0.98279816,0.00037729545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9959191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99610966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.119442016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018303301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011717194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164953031","doi":"","title":"Affirmative Action in Higher Education: What Canada Can Take from the American Experience?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Supreme court; CONTEST; Charter; Political science; Law; Constitution; Diversity (politics); Politics","score_opus":0.02307608121030572,"score_gpt":0.30784968718962147,"score_spread":0.2847736059793157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164953031","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90145427,0.0068947948,0.000011384656,0.08608091,0.0011647101,0.00012285858,0.0000015151107,0.000012218085,0.00425736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98885876,0.0046136263,0.000005521637,0.0016261735,0.0028923168,0.000013858211,0.0000013313651,0.000006670756,0.0019817578],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998133,0.00020809656,0.00019353928,0.00012169121,0.00039301848,0.00095063524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994558,0.00007999464,0.00022138841,0.00007613024,0.00008474362,0.000081924554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054489536,0.000084355874,0.00012554682,0.000027053598,0.00061067985,0.00022787163,0.0002864364,0.000028216818,0.0001518592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046974503,0.00006216821,0.00002950451,0.00038451605,0.00012887616,0.00068460166,0.000010643649,0.0007053081,0.0000052045084],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006331489,0.0001412198,0.018896468,0.0000026736666,0.00009730898,0.0000032708967,0.09037426,0.00008399902,0.00006930449,0.12004696,0.006338043,0.7638832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001388669,0.000035548353,0.014437902,0.000041006508,0.000008120556,0.000007418464,0.4224999,0.0000024540939,0.000032777276,0.019536847,0.5431075,0.00015166173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9666231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99878424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76373154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035036951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01729485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9882762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164985285","doi":"","title":"Judging as Nudging: New Governance Approaches for the Enforcement of Constitutional Social and Economic Rights","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Mandate; Political science; Accountability; Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Principal (computer security); Social rights; Constitutional law; Judicial review; Separation of powers; Public administration; Law; Business; Human rights; Economics","score_opus":0.042259918008263085,"score_gpt":0.28148632306244525,"score_spread":0.23922640505418216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164985285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6450678,0.041717306,0.07135475,0.030933367,0.0024058246,0.0022722157,0.000039969902,0.00009649178,0.20611228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99502355,0.0018822434,0.000026204627,0.000041654406,0.0014185268,0.000005720607,6.0788835e-7,0.000003901531,0.001597608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869275,0.00003478632,0.00021817033,0.00010820367,0.00021419511,0.00073187606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995309,0.0001003265,0.0002390361,0.000035856858,0.000039424078,0.000054454642],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010363742,0.00007715807,0.00014244506,0.000018691391,0.0019601611,0.000043751428,0.00017975259,0.000050298277,0.00003879913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050325707,0.00005609869,0.00007723598,0.000052080413,0.00059702067,0.0002233815,0.000015778058,0.00029378638,0.0000029073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025789028,0.000008453564,0.00045455806,0.0000034614905,0.00006642759,2.5280275e-7,0.002608542,0.000050944986,0.0000036742106,0.99351174,0.0004290054,0.00283718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001006299,0.00013669045,0.00040612288,0.000021976362,0.000051946517,0.00012265859,0.0060927523,0.00015833067,0.000084176114,0.7486042,0.24312712,0.0001877513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0155284265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010997667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34995574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005317427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006200582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W316779082","doi":"","title":"Luddites No Longer: Adopting the Technology Tutorial at the Supreme Court*","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Court of record; Law of the case; Court of equity; Concurring opinion; Majority opinion; Original jurisdiction; Economic Justice; Precedent; Damages; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.03193479066182143,"score_gpt":0.31783938553340246,"score_spread":0.28590459487158104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W316779082","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032806655,0.5870777,0.0000060945604,0.030900467,0.0038145387,0.0014646718,0.00000843107,0.0002527397,0.37319472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92992353,0.048524473,0.000054394022,0.004912363,0.010609917,0.00010756539,0.000004350924,0.00002921289,0.0058341953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830353,0.00030341742,0.00031580296,0.00015843722,0.0004184599,0.00050035765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887425,0.00032512675,0.0002070739,0.00034210164,0.00017241584,0.00007902918],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028485125,0.00013113105,0.00029451982,0.000011437173,0.0012832226,0.000076601675,0.0005832042,0.00011604911,0.00110678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010162172,0.00006582046,0.000106047715,0.00045346422,0.0006620676,0.0002409201,0.00015977821,0.00021839164,0.0018093751],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004644063,0.00004174735,0.0035768712,0.0006919415,0.000042793847,0.0000016352036,0.0012263312,1.6174988e-7,0.00002413448,0.8673019,0.11218558,0.014902253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000446859,0.000011985747,0.000054494798,0.00059249904,0.000059143127,0.0000036459317,0.00009588668,1.8486578e-7,0.00002396337,0.0004370977,0.9985719,0.000104548184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045697433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002929925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92664284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000891181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008806506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169239051","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Analysis of the Treatment of Transgender Prisoners: What the United States Can Learn from Canada and the United Kingdom","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Rochester; Emory University","keywords":"Kingdom; Transgender; Political science; Criminology; Medicine; Sociology; Gender studies; Geology","score_opus":0.037532346775630575,"score_gpt":0.2903665470817529,"score_spread":0.25283420030612236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169239051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906069,0.0020524827,0.000011033222,0.006036348,0.00013333147,0.00028546096,0.0001122769,0.000008038889,0.00075410266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99818105,0.0007813083,0.000006843954,0.00059550075,0.00006155504,0.000015975558,0.000055517743,0.000004926837,0.00029733824],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979735,0.0009016857,0.0002906102,0.0001834717,0.00045876653,0.00019199129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841475,0.00073307665,0.00021403041,0.00026742867,0.00028940165,0.000081306374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029165923,0.00012328208,0.00043378235,0.000042857922,0.0006289525,0.00016465937,0.0002511555,0.000050065195,0.00010442781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006503256,0.000058792695,0.00012800243,0.002041105,0.00071665633,0.00011105718,0.000022495287,0.000112075584,3.4151032e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046031715,0.0005674903,0.09002198,0.000073117,0.013050524,0.00002029649,0.71697336,0.017283177,0.00050039985,0.15869401,0.0013935837,0.0009617014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002914573,0.000117145704,0.032110166,0.00019483874,0.0032967017,5.827072e-7,0.45483348,0.0015423738,0.0052570007,0.0030234961,0.49630928,0.00040035154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9975465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4949157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012532505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006676399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48374578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179356839","doi":"10.29173/alr2654","title":"The Walking Wounded: Failure of Self-Represented Litigants in 2017 Supreme Court of Canada Leave to Appeal Applications","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.01557545823346896,"score_gpt":0.2951537408384793,"score_spread":0.27957828260501033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179356839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016111875,0.18787397,0.000037764385,0.11703303,0.0005528967,0.004938056,0.0000482341,0.0000396986,0.67336446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989509,0.008483012,0.00003447148,0.0006686613,0.000093812574,0.00009113749,0.0000045891284,0.0000074364707,0.0011079102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985471,0.00020072988,0.0004390626,0.0001822373,0.00038419056,0.0002467159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986501,0.00046449437,0.0001858888,0.00030143154,0.00030340324,0.000094722775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000569739,0.00007980207,0.00033131125,0.000009932177,0.00029723241,0.000028756842,0.0003369824,0.000043019736,0.000042397405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005421757,0.000062053645,0.000055490593,0.0005629241,0.00008721753,0.000085137464,0.000064294545,0.00008772403,0.0000062389067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060213724,0.00013655936,0.0054950924,0.0040515866,0.00014223169,0.000009391203,0.0049548987,0.0000051119446,0.00016929975,0.9323786,0.047968954,0.004682248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053316275,0.0000048178663,0.00023011844,0.0014475553,0.000024650315,0.0000012632058,0.0006521879,8.7198947e-7,0.00017007899,0.0004946531,0.99684525,0.00007523305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9460632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9733971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008296792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011936958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2530474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3180907258","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Reading List on Anti-Black Racism and the Law: Slavery in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Law; Reading (process); Sociology; Political science; Genealogy; Gender studies; History","score_opus":0.05628139280294006,"score_gpt":0.35755255899492483,"score_spread":0.3012711661919848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3180907258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0052012396,0.0036937918,0.0000012405183,0.015437089,0.0012422138,0.00055270095,0.000024744644,0.000023942823,0.973823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8855464,0.0063933446,0.000014128611,0.0027594196,0.0026312273,0.000035905377,0.000022226286,0.00003586201,0.102561526],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956214,0.00106608,0.00051279366,0.00051951205,0.0015838966,0.0006963072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965151,0.002580151,0.00014062964,0.00032009857,0.0002974062,0.00014660323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050964663,0.00021058861,0.0006130234,0.00013346513,0.0011101688,0.00065196893,0.00059665367,0.00030505972,0.00025238452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018835046,0.00014191495,0.000063243686,0.00079233036,0.0011350872,0.00017780413,0.00019983023,0.0009995843,0.000015501277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018839086,0.00001093314,0.00023276091,0.00014529093,0.00002737317,0.00017652434,0.005027898,0.0000028848647,0.0000019092267,0.2508725,0.74275726,0.0007258438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029276003,0.000011998834,0.00009586084,0.0008007928,0.000008365364,0.0000014750884,0.034390967,0.000010140886,0.00002749435,0.0046771895,0.95946634,0.00021664155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99980193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8803451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092493754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076298886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183566964","doi":"","title":"Turning the Tables on RDS: Racially Revealing Questions Asked by White Judges","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); Law; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.015920724273393836,"score_gpt":0.28388893423677336,"score_spread":0.2679682099633795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183566964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20050594,0.010406926,0.0004117841,0.051986083,0.0026945635,0.0008147777,0.00011214979,0.0006058201,0.732462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768909,0.00023724925,0.00016943297,0.0030279625,0.0015252312,0.00003810856,0.000017998618,0.000023109002,0.018069962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776226,0.0005149406,0.00031740422,0.00035279352,0.000595541,0.00045707074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873203,0.00035453436,0.00013387203,0.0002851753,0.00029229638,0.00020208304],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011816578,0.00015979301,0.00024228112,0.000025482603,0.0023015868,0.00066294504,0.00036577202,0.00015087437,0.00073466497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002262437,0.00012637548,0.000097875825,0.0005316245,0.00022468733,0.00043707472,0.00006796647,0.0003975416,0.00022889988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046275152,0.0002640472,0.018955672,0.00011858964,0.00015318878,0.0000761561,0.016253484,0.0008668695,0.00630119,0.782902,0.17010896,0.003953564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018081757,0.0000332785,0.0007209942,0.0003185177,0.000032155327,0.00000237126,0.0046883905,0.000014114501,0.001111749,0.0049353493,0.98767984,0.00028241685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022284357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052796613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81757087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012580326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004897999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184232745","doi":"10.7939/r3-rjhx-sb10","title":"Alberta (Education) v. Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (Access Copyright)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Alberta Library","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Internet privacy; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.01132229790481223,"score_gpt":0.23240191986753417,"score_spread":0.22107962196272193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184232745","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.122226894,0.00036746167,0.0000069150933,0.012095481,0.00052315276,0.00013088084,0.0000047648145,0.000025538382,0.8646189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8329367,0.00018710202,0.00018152797,0.0006881648,0.00021657159,1.3872469e-7,0.000049420683,0.000011934888,0.16572843],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989139,0.00014548008,0.00014468843,0.00026914617,0.00020614931,0.0003206747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988844,0.00022280963,0.000114342445,0.00020955084,0.00014609072,0.00042283683],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006581537,0.000108064174,0.00020439408,0.0001390822,0.0009094255,0.0001582713,0.0005349668,0.00014289621,0.01027187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010865078,0.00012942313,0.00008983271,0.0007060778,0.000236829,0.002333185,0.000104873965,0.00011228166,0.00015773223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039721603,0.00026156148,0.069964774,0.00016965398,0.00014796376,0.00012674103,0.13908869,0.00000641541,0.000050346363,0.31864166,0.46661478,0.0048876773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012717748,0.000008776804,0.0037239497,0.00010150253,0.000027156746,0.0000021430462,0.0054932404,0.000008708775,0.00029607225,0.0016983432,0.9883287,0.00018421689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9682765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9578091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7107098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008940907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071519343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99847656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195054819","doi":"10.29173/mlj1197","title":"“We have centuries of work undone by a few bone-heads”: A Review of Jury History, a Present Snapshot of Crown and Defence Counsel Perspectives on Bill C-75’s Elimination of Peremptory Challenges, and Representativeness Issues","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Research Manitoba","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Jury; Snapshot (computer storage); Representativeness heuristic; Law; Political science; History; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08984798323633318,"score_gpt":0.35279371786492797,"score_spread":0.2629457346285948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195054819","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021604766,0.9953259,0.000002264354,0.0008930443,0.00018458231,0.0007866345,0.00006166903,0.000006753179,0.0025230537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016702596,0.98288625,0.000029822902,0.000014075022,0.000278362,0.000021912248,0.0000067865344,0.000023525736,0.000036680376],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962301,0.0009783851,0.0011963694,0.00040722013,0.0009669147,0.000220965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961312,0.00045094866,0.0023687808,0.00020166104,0.00069956,0.00014786822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014394587,0.00031564638,0.0022063851,0.00013444516,0.00019065604,0.00002811482,0.00031632063,0.00019949801,0.000051342573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044166995,0.00023279122,0.00029022057,0.00020987401,0.0013530857,0.00025515724,0.00007984836,0.00038480407,3.3512376e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022204769,0.00067197194,0.000039608763,0.24679479,0.0006821531,0.000029446563,0.10253621,2.4711096e-7,0.000015377733,0.018687304,0.006946186,0.62337464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018188753,0.00028512598,0.00003059985,0.10177162,0.0004649864,0.000017421127,0.049674913,9.101511e-8,0.000019714835,0.0003438274,0.84699494,0.00021487256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013865585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003673311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84004873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029398597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041387888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9927012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203477145","doi":"","title":"Rejecting Word Worship: An Integrative Approach to Judicial Construction of Insurance Policies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Insurance policy; Legislative history; Statutory interpretation; Law; Supreme court; Legislation; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.016727135022781763,"score_gpt":0.3001193273696865,"score_spread":0.2833921923469047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203477145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9461183,0.0017039296,0.00604981,0.00090631493,0.0005291591,0.00015472068,0.0000034186708,0.000038393217,0.04449596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967181,0.0007073678,0.0006415505,0.00007906364,0.0013369403,0.00000469146,0.0000014280924,0.000011771692,0.00049910264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974078,0.00040766655,0.00034977464,0.00020300513,0.00042823097,0.0012035517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989848,0.000062184576,0.00025716444,0.00009489532,0.000467964,0.00013300365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020236697,0.000116559335,0.00026980438,0.000114271425,0.00072148425,0.000121668374,0.00023760811,0.00009934468,0.000011889175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072987314,0.00010476591,0.00008435566,0.00096366723,0.00019031254,0.0004501067,0.000026222555,0.0009748678,0.0000030308986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006949958,0.00011399932,0.01047414,0.000012396982,0.00008542293,0.0000016766447,0.036873758,0.00003628859,0.000962922,0.8855621,0.000027030272,0.06578076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045911747,0.00033309887,0.003224992,0.00020715765,0.000035720957,0.0002107394,0.49071714,0.000007553016,0.001954292,0.49729574,0.0051844195,0.00037003367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011290348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05098878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45384338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005959451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047414363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99529356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205792654","doi":"10.29173/mlj995","title":"Manitoba's Mental Health Court: A Consumer Perspective","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Mental health; Psychology; Sociology; Psychiatry; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03757740274435816,"score_gpt":0.3455028073994768,"score_spread":0.30792540465511864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205792654","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1287958,0.004250325,0.00010969113,0.079549626,0.0075196447,0.0008487243,0.000048964605,0.00014825612,0.77872896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99499303,0.00055122864,0.00009296965,0.00089936616,0.003223937,0.0000048744614,8.6873393e-7,0.0000184961,0.0002152413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798787,0.00023040111,0.00030959767,0.00021352257,0.00069282023,0.0005657824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984004,0.000035448065,0.0005628726,0.00023209637,0.0003724472,0.0003967745],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012834201,0.00015259936,0.00028063715,0.000047272784,0.013930294,0.0017275108,0.00067541935,0.00008840146,0.00020391574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019453016,0.00013653225,0.00012160145,0.000053352487,0.0007106966,0.00085814716,0.00008814541,0.00042006487,0.00019931034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011008151,0.00030060703,0.020276109,0.00004173328,0.00025995396,0.00021107132,0.037653927,0.000001016875,0.000042591808,0.8238701,0.081630014,0.03560279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006918883,0.00011468842,0.004420614,0.00013170308,0.000017476372,0.00011500828,0.27617308,0.000002553089,0.00002138871,0.019244758,0.6988157,0.0002511283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6750119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9087989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8661972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008369302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046654878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99930876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207090722","doi":"","title":"Syllabus for Law and Religion Course (Fall 2021)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; McGill University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Syllabus; Course (navigation); Law; Political science; Mathematics education; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.00870842216145985,"score_gpt":0.28662777363449704,"score_spread":0.2779193514730372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207090722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31365442,0.25668362,0.0115133235,0.060712084,0.0039269626,0.0012137372,0.00002127824,0.00016734247,0.3521072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755819,0.017542774,0.000050157436,0.00039427576,0.0015393189,0.0000057780885,0.0000017037196,0.0000118528205,0.004872259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808306,0.000095522926,0.00017545647,0.00015758233,0.00024123397,0.0012471353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993754,0.00008059106,0.00009883755,0.00006420124,0.00027114633,0.00010981888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016334627,0.0000788154,0.00014803025,0.000018430423,0.00089835754,0.00018474042,0.00011262735,0.00008886313,0.00001570943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016534266,0.00007315263,0.00006638065,0.00015141907,0.00010112422,0.00022274103,0.000017048194,0.00047333963,0.000008846106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015793696,0.000025950492,0.00036176396,0.00000817894,0.000044281423,0.000005026035,0.000813641,0.0000011099576,0.000092435606,0.9922873,0.00084218336,0.005502331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042841214,0.00012266236,0.000029408478,0.000036508063,0.000041410978,0.00009208045,0.0067387926,0.000005170067,0.00007726998,0.61780137,0.3744961,0.00013082134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058911457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14214323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66192746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029101013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003896969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.890569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213061309","doi":"","title":"When Fast-Tracking Slows You Down: Reconsidering Nationwide Permit 12 Use for Large-Scale Oil Pipelines","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pipeline transport; Scale (ratio); Tracking (education); Environmental science; Petroleum engineering; Economics; Engineering; Psychology; Geography; Environmental engineering","score_opus":0.042024782898753305,"score_gpt":0.29068409543556584,"score_spread":0.24865931253681253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213061309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6724602,0.0084144985,0.008105315,0.02320265,0.009688942,0.001595793,0.0005259265,0.0014472898,0.27455938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9472874,0.00022487766,0.004652657,0.0018568615,0.0034858298,0.00012122255,0.000041636347,0.000055356217,0.042274196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975669,0.00018620401,0.0005305316,0.00053589494,0.00051618967,0.0006642737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808484,0.00040663697,0.0001938864,0.0002898562,0.0007345157,0.00029024846],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010673325,0.00021166923,0.00036730594,0.00005608405,0.0014925984,0.00096185436,0.00027911807,0.00021961473,0.00063726545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002327523,0.00021997323,0.00019628466,0.00026803734,0.00010254447,0.0016159744,0.000091723494,0.00025183626,0.000120964185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032488734,0.001284086,0.16258316,0.0021384628,0.0006082236,0.00038593038,0.12004256,0.00064076664,0.020677725,0.48780265,0.0805273,0.12298424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059832487,0.000021491593,0.0005790542,0.00021035547,0.00003964729,0.00000632466,0.007873663,0.00008376559,0.0018971204,0.005127156,0.9831745,0.00038858733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010701114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26874438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9026472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011959709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050754444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215340977","doi":"","title":"The Role of Law in the Conduct of Canada-U.S. Relations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.022021545655391727,"score_gpt":0.2559886629228827,"score_spread":0.23396711726749098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215340977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6759472,0.0043558497,0.0000070903757,0.015056872,0.0005878524,0.0003157336,0.00012396617,0.0000075562466,0.3035979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99888,0.00021395084,0.0000068938075,0.000534286,0.00012157717,0.000002417266,0.000004639703,0.000005428027,0.00023079322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998148,0.00035912302,0.0004070893,0.00006366667,0.0007252918,0.0002967781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986309,0.00046925602,0.00027476271,0.00011039151,0.00040242067,0.000112292255],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008818891,0.00007270166,0.0001511812,0.000033671105,0.0024223702,0.000037867845,0.00041091684,0.000038311282,0.0000379365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002133386,0.000044370667,0.00003099859,0.0005049992,0.00053714373,0.0001302582,0.000012559631,0.00030391364,1.6652845e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002034114,0.00003075254,0.004181179,0.000010269694,0.000059023372,0.00007866331,0.022688342,0.0010041465,0.000042946467,0.9343244,0.037270866,0.00028907266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012514235,0.000018604687,0.0009666263,0.00002687543,0.000008158748,0.000024517609,0.036341477,0.000032076026,0.000120476485,0.0072001065,0.955068,0.0000679357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.999811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99997836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92712426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025938422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050034705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99887633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W322187415","doi":"","title":"The Oral Judgment Practice in the Canadian Appellate Courts","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Common law; Psychology; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.01983593079110275,"score_gpt":0.34168180213300475,"score_spread":0.321845871341902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W322187415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075566165,0.029106315,0.000058619513,0.2602692,0.0010187852,0.0010256121,0.0000022449735,0.0000129270275,0.6329402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986212,0.009816175,0.00003232877,0.003322052,0.00028000516,0.0000026973119,1.1095849e-7,0.000010403906,0.00032421082],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99606794,0.002021051,0.00047509663,0.00011040025,0.0008620453,0.00046344273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99486786,0.0033412518,0.00081895926,0.00015908999,0.0006322474,0.00018060055],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019985221,0.00013641962,0.00018959117,0.00006156661,0.0023944306,0.00067755504,0.00058094005,0.000099392055,0.00002021467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004889758,0.00006444092,0.000041245436,0.00049647153,0.00030889962,0.0011807285,0.00001620912,0.00074102904,0.000021230364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020411753,0.00057210773,0.0020931866,0.000216451,0.00065467565,0.0006034914,0.7581272,0.0012775601,0.000054977136,0.14623974,0.026265437,0.06185395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025351992,0.00008925123,0.00007923482,0.000051474355,0.0001331259,0.00036162115,0.106432915,0.000007175919,0.000036686215,0.008267919,0.8841837,0.00010335261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14880371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2705648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91064584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009884517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016547306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W327359422","doi":"","title":"Hopeful Result, Unclear Implications: A Comment on Canada (Attorney General) V. PHS Community Services Society","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Possession (linguistics); Legislation; Government (linguistics); Political science; Business; Public administration","score_opus":0.04954407218080468,"score_gpt":0.3524190806559234,"score_spread":0.3028750084751187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W327359422","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030636159,0.1263992,0.0000056319855,0.7557168,0.00043966365,0.0038453292,0.000094930656,0.00016117252,0.11027366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23867433,0.11801046,0.00013990716,0.64198935,0.00038853326,0.00035613892,0.000053982072,0.000021670734,0.00036561574],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972569,0.0011083508,0.00055472367,0.00019851014,0.0004195202,0.00046199266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983662,0.00018267926,0.00034258864,0.00047133252,0.0002668305,0.0003704044],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019652178,0.00014729708,0.00042635523,0.000007384058,0.002630735,0.00009640113,0.00048037214,0.000060925824,0.00018094887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005730206,0.000121765064,0.000085349624,0.0003345852,0.00010689954,0.00019907953,0.00006942362,0.00034418746,0.00011455305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013989035,0.00008828971,0.00016430805,0.0065172105,0.000018673743,1.8698336e-7,0.00229151,0.00000101111,9.188381e-7,0.19076133,0.7902573,0.009897868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091613685,0.00004150224,0.00071923394,0.0023738965,0.000008017562,4.0305054e-7,0.0006435776,0.0000026243404,8.4810625e-7,0.0008212589,0.9951725,0.00012450927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.997917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9680369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23561071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068962766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014702686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W333347183","doi":"","title":"How Just Is Our Justice System","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ETC.: A Review of General Semantics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cynicism; Skepticism; Law; Economic Justice; Faith; Sociology; Political science; Legal profession; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03499994370798245,"score_gpt":0.32622125447458317,"score_spread":0.29122131076660074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W333347183","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032489058,0.5561501,0.0011244031,0.22705095,0.006451744,0.005139151,0.000065614164,0.00047703786,0.17105195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89670604,0.08090136,0.0009586209,0.003211981,0.0026048045,0.000055624914,0.0000052619407,0.000029950921,0.015526324],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997976,0.00023034631,0.00047098252,0.0002519529,0.0006796218,0.0003910692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845904,0.000036030484,0.0003983326,0.00029063344,0.00063092617,0.00018505633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007690724,0.00017833358,0.0005853542,0.00004264817,0.00034260977,0.00017554856,0.000417652,0.00012277103,0.00009484815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039087315,0.00014248893,0.0001811182,0.0004787898,0.0000789679,0.00036902138,0.00006596689,0.00013165321,0.00022519435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003205708,0.0001049372,0.000480531,0.11268885,0.00011777896,0.000012206572,0.004029791,0.0000018340481,0.0009543103,0.1226578,0.7409548,0.017993938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019429902,0.0000640774,0.0002057927,0.012982727,0.00055850187,0.000006130284,0.010151869,0.0001007786,0.0004931968,0.00022793941,0.97457546,0.0004392318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011887327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027149895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86421704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007685717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019381501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W337740633","doi":"","title":"Security Breach Notification Soon Becoming Mandatory in Canada, Canadian Privacy Law Review","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Data breach; Information privacy; Business; Privacy law; Computer security; Law; Privacy laws of the United States; The Right to Privacy; Political science; Privacy policy; Computer science; Human rights","score_opus":0.02039286490380941,"score_gpt":0.2689180990166476,"score_spread":0.2485252341128382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W337740633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19013639,0.005595727,0.000006667448,0.04954043,0.00056388497,0.0015398077,0.000013023526,0.000051954336,0.7525521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99478465,0.00034796057,0.000011252512,0.004231817,0.00011103715,0.000036476406,0.000005765243,0.0000051703055,0.00046586076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989428,0.000103464474,0.00023522474,0.00016430573,0.00023707662,0.00031711793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941534,0.000038599177,0.000060530543,0.00012931497,0.000107078995,0.0002491573],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005293822,0.00006869722,0.00015225758,0.00003163477,0.00030854173,0.0000682635,0.00021627883,0.000047337926,0.0012001547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000110011526,0.00006469728,0.000018109546,0.00022481785,0.000043490974,0.0003749527,0.000014473641,0.000103700804,0.00009491872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020783277,0.00006289,0.113486476,0.0014508354,0.000022934168,0.000019553281,0.0143269105,0.0000025162576,0.000041728996,0.5381062,0.30908957,0.023388335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083002975,0.0000034976633,0.019001136,0.00040399333,0.0000057775705,5.236576e-7,0.0017999287,0.000020785772,0.000025503932,0.00244573,0.976005,0.00020507534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8046483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011434146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037698187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W341806150","doi":"","title":"For their own good? Exploring legislative responses to the commercial sexual exploitation of children and the Illinois Safe Children Act","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vanderbilt law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Statutory law; Legislation; Legislature; Legislative intent; Law; Harm; Criminology; Political science; Safeguarding; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.08878705201028878,"score_gpt":0.33679254127003855,"score_spread":0.24800548925974977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W341806150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59097594,0.31391513,0.0011938488,0.04754326,0.0012502327,0.015583009,0.00027428468,0.00014469287,0.029119566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837712,0.012988871,0.000053522057,0.0017148177,0.0009709329,0.00033444882,0.000008136398,0.000015112094,0.00014295365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980797,0.00074912835,0.0003808373,0.00018293709,0.000290092,0.00031729136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793893,0.0013540536,0.00024012255,0.00022522858,0.00014129136,0.00010039941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035622006,0.00015382568,0.00043323063,0.000022389642,0.0009426837,0.00006550218,0.0003126592,0.000050179184,0.000019442881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010148434,0.00007668615,0.000108484746,0.00028960375,0.0003637098,0.0005236045,0.00007213594,0.00011005846,0.000007224543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047720267,0.00017298243,0.031777386,0.0008605069,0.0004158965,1.16438514e-7,0.16096684,0.0000047185413,0.000029888477,0.6149741,0.006355424,0.18396497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016247168,0.0002881818,0.065379545,0.00211265,0.00042720902,0.000005078261,0.0051627457,0.0000019607055,0.00025841498,0.001992374,0.9221794,0.0005677015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011262827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004435479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.915824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028608682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000077084755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W34182808","doi":"10.1177/02692155211028018","title":"Notional Severance, Usurious Contracts, and Two Comments on the Supreme Court's Decision in the New Solutions Case","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Severance; Appeal; Political science; Plaintiff","score_opus":0.020536581013972516,"score_gpt":0.3024325397614665,"score_spread":0.28189595874749396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W34182808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83887315,0.007959101,0.0022418317,0.1400271,0.00038073058,0.00055549736,0.00000670415,0.00002307235,0.009932826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99478924,0.0021666903,0.000016212038,0.0015407413,0.0011538812,0.0000044536127,5.285086e-7,0.0000060257394,0.0003222397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977592,0.0003089182,0.00023286467,0.00011917855,0.0004889612,0.0010908786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990988,0.0005559961,0.000112223075,0.00008601362,0.00006806478,0.000078926976],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004345177,0.00009377501,0.00011380419,0.00004817194,0.0017003481,0.00021689273,0.00025556784,0.000052728414,0.000040044615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025628408,0.000054833017,0.000047725534,0.00020706213,0.00010644929,0.00029372115,0.000017808095,0.0010747646,0.00001797492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088690256,0.00018126257,0.0015689249,0.000001313323,0.000051820814,0.000054083208,0.0085241245,0.00030641205,0.00001342031,0.9105033,0.010335351,0.06837126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002869105,0.00027303468,0.0032617718,0.00012052615,0.000048680777,0.0029983018,0.018521534,0.00030784792,0.000005344144,0.5252754,0.44599774,0.00032070867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0106045725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25034493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4356624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056151533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017041101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W36143415","doi":"10.29173/alr359","title":"An Introduction to Various Issues Surrounding the Ownership of Storage/Pipeline Gas","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Energy","funders":"","keywords":"Pipeline (software); Law and economics; Insolvency; Leasehold estate; Natural gas; Business; Class (philosophy); Economics; Law; Political science; Computer science; Finance; Engineering","score_opus":0.051576194431045885,"score_gpt":0.3566077667291348,"score_spread":0.3050315722980889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W36143415","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030464362,0.23920101,0.00036294403,0.53259444,0.00477173,0.0035972737,0.000005954671,0.00016157544,0.18884072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869301,0.00446624,0.00008640217,0.0022402785,0.0034245816,0.000025840005,0.0000057357806,0.000013791688,0.0028070747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841034,0.00046481326,0.0003156519,0.00020766057,0.0003905732,0.0002109274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989438,0.00012756656,0.00015664157,0.00031390833,0.00028674115,0.00017136475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028020588,0.00009592759,0.00031261353,0.000017144377,0.00024741385,0.000073506315,0.00034824063,0.000046194837,0.00012336361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015668202,0.000060379993,0.00005282634,0.00048785954,0.00013274205,0.00034471185,0.000027005022,0.000084351006,0.00009011173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013918854,0.00008013909,0.00027495777,0.00073089066,0.000022027629,0.0000013890543,0.016190805,0.000014223939,0.000038601836,0.87515455,0.08836947,0.019109042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042523978,0.000055887052,0.000007208434,0.00037798833,0.00004110513,0.0000015658469,0.00064147194,0.0000031198263,0.000029405757,0.0010536718,0.99765605,0.000089987516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29060778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13028815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9564657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006451573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012951833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8855818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W366855202","doi":"","title":"Securing Mobile Technology & Financial Transactions in the United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Internet privacy; Mobile phone; Financial services; Work (physics); Mobile technology; Consumer privacy; Computer security; Financial transaction; Information privacy; Finance; Telecommunications; Mobile computing; Computer science; Engineering; Database transaction","score_opus":0.008556099296420622,"score_gpt":0.2739848455485193,"score_spread":0.26542874625209867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W366855202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98157406,0.00607805,0.0045191883,0.004443059,0.00036050848,0.00022910658,0.0000013823988,0.00004854426,0.0027461178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955293,0.0035075587,0.000006009951,0.00011169914,0.0005455515,0.000023214288,8.031219e-7,0.0000062421786,0.00026963782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976739,0.00016121802,0.00017300715,0.000067905974,0.00022422565,0.0016997135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971074,0.000057895075,0.000072906245,0.000058504284,0.00005471939,0.000045258203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026731645,0.00006936355,0.00009650802,0.00019740753,0.0007531181,0.00005256709,0.00027571115,0.0000992906,0.000035651254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007397014,0.0000504618,0.00004252019,0.0010079705,0.00010727427,0.00029802052,0.0000046054834,0.0013005193,0.000013522849],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027190048,0.00028202267,0.008351594,0.000010076341,0.000042299045,0.0000043360933,0.074989125,0.00030665638,0.0000547526,0.8744118,0.00013571931,0.04138438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038734853,0.00018455983,0.00040970452,0.00002993101,0.000024899948,0.00011028663,0.19485016,0.000015966261,0.00005821585,0.26925758,0.53447115,0.00020016542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077165025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038000945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6051543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042638884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012907023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W368277265","doi":"","title":"Forensic Use of DNA Information V. Human Rights and Privacy Challenges","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Western Sydney law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Internet privacy; Profiling (computer programming); Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Human rights; Accidental; DNA profiling; Business; Computer science; Biology; DNA; Genetics","score_opus":0.043930047416583025,"score_gpt":0.2602114521093683,"score_spread":0.21628140469278528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W368277265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8803591,0.024967887,0.00007141383,0.0054061185,0.00014013103,0.001963293,0.000022134634,0.0000867499,0.086983144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894808,0.009972361,0.00007457122,0.00012846693,0.000021748541,3.2332676e-7,0.000003880379,0.0000020058712,0.00031585275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940836,0.00008109046,0.0001659824,0.00007273527,0.00017656127,0.00009525046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934506,0.0000373538,0.00023048653,0.00011088522,0.00020537539,0.00007084108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018226689,0.00005916403,0.00024755616,0.000027096443,0.00023614454,0.00002164384,0.0001417162,0.000049890154,0.000068410096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027959755,0.000054948618,0.00004326426,0.00007044116,0.00026720768,0.0015659439,0.000056222456,0.00003727759,0.000023248793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000857855,0.00009102741,0.004925943,0.013741633,0.00009893281,0.0000030067797,0.033815667,2.443085e-7,0.000051909556,0.90873843,0.005158109,0.033366486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012563945,0.000036599224,0.0028526387,0.002294143,0.00004020693,6.498265e-7,0.00034052914,2.9953816e-7,0.000020778292,0.0015235372,0.992682,0.00008300333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08423631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01301573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98752385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016924785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023362732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9218618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W38524600","doi":"10.29173/alr368","title":"Recent Judicial Developments of Interest to Oil and Gas Lawyers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freehold; Fossil fuel; Law; Government (linguistics); Judicial review; Energy law; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Environmental law; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1103150384777167,"score_gpt":0.35085352382388235,"score_spread":0.24053848534616565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W38524600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01715668,0.07885774,0.0000018562034,0.026302895,0.00063536514,0.0002998096,0.0000024161752,0.000020828093,0.8767224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7564041,0.22893943,0.00020853973,0.009968818,0.0003853791,0.000055420525,0.0000057045254,0.000023009514,0.0040096147],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898595,0.0001233424,0.00031140802,0.00016724256,0.00021559744,0.00019648265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924093,0.000081235135,0.000109773915,0.00010122776,0.00020328691,0.00026353865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074970705,0.00008822873,0.00031789177,0.000016731361,0.00011732399,0.00002898167,0.00017661422,0.000044865217,0.00007622532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00097225443,0.000074082054,0.000028050976,0.00029847008,0.00012600195,0.00013765889,0.00007051301,0.000050197523,0.00010426457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018495117,0.000059910333,0.0009413525,0.001277733,0.00004466128,0.0000031048341,0.007413932,9.970421e-8,0.000012182466,0.44759938,0.02884266,0.5137865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008892133,0.000028828781,0.000022614317,0.0021174832,0.000020626832,8.956422e-7,0.00014666916,5.0789424e-8,0.000020865884,0.00064708124,0.9968098,0.00009617497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09633107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2107553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96796715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053853957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023189404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90968657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W38735234","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104307","title":"Family Law Rules: Rule 42- Appointment of family case manager in the family court of the Superior Court of Justice in Ottawa","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Ergonomics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Campbell Soup Company; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality","keywords":"Law; Family court; Economic Justice; Family law; High Court; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.017151541332203,"score_gpt":0.26543569037176307,"score_spread":0.24828414903956006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W38735234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9161725,0.0001888208,0.000020484262,0.00027396355,0.00041026724,0.0007422545,0.00005270151,0.000010588611,0.08212842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998837,0.00011099714,0.00027697627,0.0004996303,0.00015418792,0.000057403355,0.000002719991,0.000018576447,0.00004250475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981281,0.0001258219,0.0007747329,0.0002602994,0.00037127812,0.00033973707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869037,0.00035357848,0.00036758353,0.00043940698,0.00009396872,0.00005512104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018651746,0.00017799738,0.00045174095,0.00007756938,0.00020452969,0.00003903622,0.00074191537,0.0002084031,0.000009766135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006865,0.00012772637,0.0001037633,0.00038789335,0.00076446636,0.000120405035,0.000111575915,0.00036486643,0.000009660017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022625389,0.00066206726,0.0033621285,0.00050751516,0.00007298647,0.000038726626,0.042313263,0.0005223031,0.039064027,0.9075854,0.0018132346,0.0038321048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005736952,0.00027954185,0.20784484,0.00047370634,0.00057495624,0.000030937394,0.5600094,0.0005164649,0.0073103355,0.024485463,0.19116087,0.001576489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09381897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0438515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8830999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008102761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000295078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97359574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W399115648","doi":"","title":"Originalism: A Quarter-Century of Debate","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Federalist; Constitution; Original meaning; Law; Economic Justice; Quarter (Canadian coin); Meaning (existential); Political science; Sociology; History; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.018954366920051317,"score_gpt":0.30526493557333045,"score_spread":0.28631056865327914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W399115648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000037461334,0.0016940078,0.00010902061,0.0002188194,0.00082573376,0.00024544576,0.00001007724,0.00007619367,0.99678326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016992077,0.00058156694,0.00006106816,0.0001911873,0.0017277384,0.000003648258,0.000010702376,0.000020135161,0.9804119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834514,0.000048901842,0.00038463782,0.00021975518,0.00069108396,0.0003104897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989862,0.000108190514,0.00029689263,0.0001559588,0.00032059217,0.00013216061],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007180835,0.0001599887,0.0004004557,0.00012572366,0.00016708077,0.000066489956,0.0003224056,0.000435684,0.0010823089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056771165,0.00013755044,0.00013640484,0.00015232475,0.0002928687,0.00017217979,0.000024078176,0.000201699,0.00017205339],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010446641,0.000026086467,0.00003527058,0.00017680046,0.000041751977,0.000018952018,0.0047563314,8.1330796e-8,0.0000034655243,0.7526901,0.23902509,0.0032156715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008025246,0.000035381378,0.0000040415835,0.00016626838,0.000027063737,7.2058435e-7,0.0007670686,1.5938238e-7,0.000009874309,0.0154792555,0.9832577,0.00017221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024337886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010586019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7442326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016623287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013916679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205154769","doi":"10.22215/etd/2021-14731","title":"Genetic Discrimination and Beyond – A Proposal for Ethical Life Insurance","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Exceptionalism; Genetic discrimination; Life insurance; Actuarial science; Genetic testing; Insurance policy; Test (biology); Luck; Law and economics; Legislation; Business; Law; Economics; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.018527207158352054,"score_gpt":0.33097100874542384,"score_spread":0.3124438015870718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205154769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40311134,0.010966865,0.0011704434,0.020355355,0.0046810177,0.0036296442,0.00009088162,0.00022750939,0.55576694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778217,0.00041356473,0.0010897708,0.0004183648,0.0009013945,0.00016171926,0.00015225311,0.000020378102,0.019020839],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882406,0.00009745258,0.00023141477,0.00029120047,0.00036496695,0.00019088373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991707,0.00012749936,0.00012474679,0.00006307778,0.00039712177,0.00011682243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033658728,0.000120559554,0.00023289319,0.000041408784,0.00048494604,0.00022088787,0.000098995595,0.0005995096,0.00006860339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010691965,0.000107675514,0.000055404387,0.00014288424,0.00008136678,0.000101303944,0.000008960863,0.00023545384,0.0000030899548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001259228,0.00011233252,0.002429289,0.0029299639,0.0000852659,0.000006960164,0.09274437,0.0000010699218,0.00039140615,0.8396604,0.012161142,0.04935188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002174362,0.000583283,0.14150587,0.0015792397,0.00048498393,0.000004143469,0.36398363,0.00014332334,0.0009532399,0.2596699,0.22620693,0.00271108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055360333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10344523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5799905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023056207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016950384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9129146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226020095","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4056228","title":"A Mighty Fortress is Our Court: Abusive Litigant Abatement at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Fortress (chess); Political science; History","score_opus":0.009965136432084788,"score_gpt":0.259841814722693,"score_spread":0.24987667829060822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226020095","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9126989,0.010865328,0.000085603664,0.0639806,0.0014630606,0.0006067315,0.00012789697,0.000019232672,0.010152604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987376,0.0011779607,0.0000014308,0.00045933016,0.00048241808,0.0000219704,0.0000027961821,0.000013739788,0.010464407],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996052,0.0002790655,0.0003861651,0.00017101565,0.0013528568,0.0017588648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999022,0.000060532348,0.00041081972,0.0001397816,0.00024387611,0.00012299212],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002925971,0.00012578064,0.00022472157,0.000040279978,0.0030697188,0.000053678894,0.0005634571,0.000035560442,0.00037487858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006796669,0.000092281676,0.00011044981,0.00028589956,0.00007199424,0.00012432439,0.00011951211,0.0009517882,0.0000031290397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064377784,0.0006295393,0.03322874,0.00014722765,0.0023580298,0.00015830899,0.13416578,0.0010799838,0.001097417,0.40514785,0.4133653,0.007978046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070491387,0.0003443495,0.00036760423,0.00003841587,0.000084169886,0.00013206663,0.35328922,0.000028302053,0.0004383408,0.035336815,0.6089265,0.0003093355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8119871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97367585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36981103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00421568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018002626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229795280","doi":"10.1089/glre.2011.16315","title":"<i>Pineau v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation</i> <i>Case No. CV-10-00399497, [2011] O.J. No. 4360, 2011 ON.C. LEXIS 9344, 2011 ONSC 5822 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, October 5, 2011)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Lexis; Download; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web; Mathematics; Philosophy; Statistics","score_opus":0.03211866439953598,"score_gpt":0.25939014346978134,"score_spread":0.22727147907024536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229795280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64089614,0.08871476,0.000057632344,0.0014335386,0.0050284965,0.0024679082,0.00019775172,0.00013882235,0.26106492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8744993,0.053358704,0.0014895712,0.008919718,0.0032773325,0.00015291484,0.0001090373,0.00014834145,0.05804506],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747294,0.0001346131,0.0009928579,0.0005330329,0.00018031723,0.00068622176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808127,0.0001905535,0.00064667244,0.0003852756,0.00026846587,0.00042776437],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016568658,0.00040695907,0.0010461614,0.000067013854,0.0008141552,0.00019385645,0.00023767039,0.00023821903,0.0027632709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000072914205,0.00039300937,0.00015589171,0.000046719844,0.0004493349,0.0013898736,0.00013002781,0.0003208037,0.0015544968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005335047,0.0018143012,0.1941467,0.020259704,0.001176764,0.00020917728,0.0486668,0.000028438031,0.00029022663,0.19934115,0.512868,0.020665238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044343868,0.00013780802,0.0012470697,0.0005209434,0.0004544909,0.00008100424,0.00023549492,0.000008343822,0.000023047054,0.000120646044,0.9961826,0.00054511067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57030684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6061011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4833146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003339129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000536271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230516726","doi":"10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim030310344","title":"The Story of an Illusion: The Plan to Trade the 'Alabama' Claims for Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"The SHAFR Guide Online","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Illusion; Plan (archaeology); History; Psychology; Archaeology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.03726105557574012,"score_gpt":0.36292009114538787,"score_spread":0.32565903556964776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230516726","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046791093,0.0013901861,0.0000025675386,0.11379082,0.0021723476,0.0014932152,0.87969935,0.000016875907,0.0009667079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031557668,0.00325216,0.000098190394,0.018383496,0.037943445,0.00062681263,0.87116283,0.00018242079,0.03679295],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700534,0.00073667534,0.0004840473,0.00029338282,0.000976633,0.00050389225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99578863,0.0017367952,0.0006311657,0.0015127776,0.00018620983,0.00014444167],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046453825,0.00026185997,0.00038839623,0.000021330834,0.0073334477,0.0002330698,0.0047671758,0.00019030186,0.000046181416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018398677,0.000101069316,0.0001381218,0.00015873663,0.0008131566,0.00008921444,0.00026097315,0.00062313234,0.0000065773656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035151843,0.000022583316,0.0000010520347,0.00003360335,0.00005065176,0.000002112263,0.0016535525,0.00001053244,0.0000029960856,0.00054866436,0.99453735,0.003101726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011325861,0.00007529749,0.00014033787,0.00009252313,0.00009561275,0.0000022601348,0.0068237875,0.000012039648,0.0000027538645,0.00051102706,0.9919629,0.00016821346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8971187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09710197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018300246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032807512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231016205","doi":"10.1089/glr2.2017.2176","title":"SAADATI v. MOORHEADCase No. 36703; 2017 SCC 28 (Supreme Court of Canada, June 2, 2017)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04692567298294598,"score_gpt":0.33077687592443095,"score_spread":0.28385120294148497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231016205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011378484,0.19647805,0.000031748295,0.013017883,0.0031744237,0.0011188536,0.000097047145,0.0000607036,0.78488344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8751446,0.0894349,0.0003473648,0.0024414565,0.0016658832,0.000054104563,0.000015412323,0.000041755422,0.030854505],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978736,0.00016046895,0.00052000774,0.00029095667,0.0007007747,0.00045417208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780756,0.00009138046,0.0006984034,0.00070763804,0.00046823063,0.000226767],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001709431,0.00017284269,0.0006439103,0.000015674837,0.0017261776,0.00014386202,0.00085946807,0.00008785181,0.00025681648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00150027,0.0001515995,0.00010911621,0.00009271141,0.00041408255,0.0004791318,0.000109994864,0.00014624826,0.00010533894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009611699,0.00007300512,0.0006307053,0.0073779323,0.000076383,0.00009374196,0.0006854187,4.6295168e-7,0.00010882606,0.09427299,0.88107306,0.015597854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011536678,0.000014126654,0.00027719783,0.004885638,0.000054328462,0.000002810718,0.000041890577,0.0000032751016,0.00004215946,0.00024774577,0.99412173,0.00019374436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92615926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9187232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87400675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012251116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012049412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231234638","doi":"10.1089/glre.2008.13111","title":"Bear Hills Charitable Foundation v. Alberta (Gaming and Liquor Commission), <i>[2008] A.J. No. 1431</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Foundation (evidence); Download; Political science; Library science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.015426669396747698,"score_gpt":0.2679643827990066,"score_spread":0.2525377134022589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231234638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06189106,0.18130976,0.00009171369,0.04091084,0.0011882907,0.0019241866,0.000022011627,0.00015845444,0.7125037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80399835,0.17702141,0.00042119776,0.009101728,0.0009307443,0.000018467814,0.000024405941,0.00002255293,0.008461133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999063,0.000055822773,0.00031845734,0.00024689786,0.000055860743,0.0002599235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994196,0.00008850331,0.00015494919,0.00011983919,0.000059794256,0.00015730898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006722523,0.00012432176,0.00036134658,0.000018618131,0.0007180914,0.00021275412,0.00011020772,0.00008084556,0.000066261455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015914187,0.00011860891,0.000039467646,0.00007146321,0.00012247256,0.0006086908,0.00003095552,0.00008917152,0.00006800893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001417866,0.00010977974,0.0014350303,0.0021517053,0.000055971424,0.000002694421,0.003496566,0.0000030244094,0.000079181125,0.82634145,0.010769635,0.15554078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011286769,0.000036634745,0.0001745305,0.0005606318,0.000041592215,0.0000031998272,0.000054333603,0.000024718518,0.000009363756,0.0022206565,0.9965904,0.00017112416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015119946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051058466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9858207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005051418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006563331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99143845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232095161","doi":"10.4135/9781412971966.n166","title":"Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Encyclopedia of African American Education","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.008305614785608956,"score_gpt":0.27743689446464015,"score_spread":0.26913127967903117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232095161","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007279892,0.0028756277,0.0000058224914,0.0032837088,0.0077773174,0.00048677746,0.00013165815,0.00008814747,0.97807103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4012155,0.08814219,0.00073752523,0.0005810805,0.017863544,0.00016953169,0.0003070456,0.00017161662,0.49081197],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968265,0.00026804928,0.0006662699,0.00052659365,0.0011353936,0.00057716883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966731,0.00033727114,0.0014527524,0.0004527196,0.0006638967,0.0004202651],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037322444,0.00035913393,0.0007963848,0.00022817026,0.00036263454,0.00006311313,0.0007590313,0.0002788079,0.00033209895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014134682,0.00035457299,0.00012753897,0.0011171014,0.000844242,0.00015666026,0.00005603745,0.0007127644,0.000024588044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008815273,0.00013660987,0.0012918434,0.00016637526,0.00003479703,0.0000016335352,0.0078754565,3.055561e-7,8.5539233e-7,0.00097032095,0.80293816,0.18657485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004652913,0.0000472849,0.0012411154,0.00021116748,0.00006570944,9.4124226e-7,0.024556346,1.9284265e-7,0.0000037569625,0.00035327955,0.97307867,0.0003949829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9870394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9436655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4872591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061494746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038985945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233383303","doi":"10.1163/1570-6664_iyb_sim_person_26466","title":"Fridman, Prof. Gerald Henry Louis, MA, BCL, LL.M, QC (Ontario), FRSC","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"International Year Book and Statesmen's Who's Who","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"St louis; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.011119779279840127,"score_gpt":0.2809018343251173,"score_spread":0.26978205504527714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233383303","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001018313,0.0031268059,0.000082724444,0.010170772,0.0055593248,0.0015033466,0.80122983,0.00019872843,0.17711017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0035076372,0.0068269586,0.00010045213,0.0045618773,0.009144534,0.00021593158,0.5341626,0.00011955557,0.44136047],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968433,0.00017026877,0.00058755203,0.0006853266,0.0011584645,0.0005551105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984768,0.00015279252,0.00041815816,0.00030719678,0.00035917535,0.00028584944],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068057247,0.0004172492,0.00059526577,0.00020652784,0.0005536864,0.0007672432,0.00082050124,0.0004547049,0.004954217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015166205,0.0003960324,0.0001496989,0.000110754416,0.00034751825,0.0005083452,0.00023736367,0.0006758533,0.0007024258],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000342112,0.000055133878,0.0006193048,0.00008005408,0.00017377191,0.000028714514,0.0013157165,0.0000022895829,0.0000012334339,0.0036423684,0.9936894,0.0003577961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041239412,0.000089103654,0.00027495713,0.00030631688,0.00005509467,0.0000033363917,0.00024084613,0.0000073620035,0.0000040622176,0.0029262358,0.99519825,0.00048202687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26855588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12888631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26706725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000398565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006875248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233760448","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20910","title":"Paton Estate v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Commission (c.o.b. Fallsview Casino Resort)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Estate; Commission; Download; Real estate; Advertising; Business; Political science; Law; Economics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02501758896512817,"score_gpt":0.26404554970336713,"score_spread":0.23902796073823895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233760448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7112659,0.1174337,0.00006067402,0.0077603264,0.00055546034,0.000958287,0.000020053607,0.00010711879,0.16183846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7466536,0.24958397,0.00007796678,0.0012434354,0.00015552086,0.00001279774,0.0000018056967,0.000015596335,0.0022552914],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896526,0.00008577961,0.0003508978,0.0002711675,0.000057630154,0.00026927068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938565,0.00010588657,0.00016832074,0.00013652586,0.000032834556,0.00017075009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008317369,0.00013425261,0.0003945702,0.000018520304,0.00047020393,0.00011442468,0.00010507121,0.00007244944,0.0000698309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056676916,0.000097442506,0.00004375482,0.000039068418,0.00019710281,0.00041400242,0.00006658239,0.000076881945,0.000021499036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017132055,0.000045440323,0.030970663,0.0031700754,0.00006842529,0.000018159693,0.008266067,3.418801e-7,0.00006011243,0.16033506,0.0022376794,0.79481083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014268004,0.000021784503,0.0012483991,0.0020358295,0.000048309103,0.000008209324,0.00008973503,9.662949e-7,0.000009617984,0.0008755059,0.9953366,0.00018236713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1162331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25080833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9930989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014116053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000121237805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88965195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235374131","doi":"10.1002/9780470015902.a0005188","title":"Genetic Information Access, a Legal Perspective: A Duty to Know or a Right Not to Know, and a Duty or Option to Warn?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Encyclopedia of Life Sciences","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Right to know; Harm; Duty to warn; Duty; Genetic testing; Legislation; Perspective (graphical); Internet privacy; Personally identifiable information; Confidentiality; Genetic engineering; Need to know; Psychology; Political science; Law; Social psychology; Medicine; Computer security; Computer science; Genetics","score_opus":0.018785663983132497,"score_gpt":0.33304394215067723,"score_spread":0.31425827816754476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235374131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012658515,0.0013570978,0.0005910113,0.0076406416,0.0016411721,0.002671182,0.00011478174,0.00020403377,0.9731216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2003467,0.026590725,0.014569319,0.005331597,0.009582387,0.00069941033,0.000009161827,0.00023926358,0.74263144],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966477,0.00016404716,0.00059619965,0.0006306707,0.0013752732,0.0005860739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982088,0.00015056269,0.00041073785,0.00022462408,0.00033160322,0.0006736538],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008095554,0.00033568277,0.0005973257,0.00081029546,0.00075056375,0.00040145507,0.0010509058,0.00025976455,0.0009591899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027173648,0.00023621753,0.00007248097,0.0025280272,0.00055584766,0.0012807577,0.0002851834,0.0001577638,0.00024167105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025493978,0.0001037064,0.0016747724,0.00021695465,0.00003442794,0.000015397385,0.055784345,0.00005705833,0.00001037637,0.0047874427,0.92865556,0.008405035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018228302,0.00043468334,0.0018079036,0.00037492884,0.00001969833,0.0000044417393,0.0054269596,0.0000064379456,0.000008218299,0.00008373404,0.9912292,0.00042152926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08732991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08525378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23049013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001669733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029853245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236248285","doi":"10.1089/1092188042380095","title":"Ontario Superior Court of Justice: &lt;I&gt;MGM Grand Hotel Inc. v Chu&lt;/I&gt;","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Art","score_opus":0.025415346161760704,"score_gpt":0.29378179329766596,"score_spread":0.26836644713590524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236248285","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06866139,0.50707585,0.00028543614,0.004672862,0.0020663075,0.0024598932,0.000044194814,0.00022434877,0.4145097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9565257,0.039511513,0.00030405665,0.0011720546,0.0005249444,0.00004254929,0.000010204978,0.000025332334,0.0018836757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977597,0.00014339492,0.00064564,0.00032506027,0.00066923787,0.00045695403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988763,0.000093124174,0.00028202467,0.00027800497,0.0002786977,0.00019190309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001442352,0.00021052628,0.00074109645,0.00003487892,0.0006143752,0.00008513461,0.00040594043,0.00014450164,0.0004065852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003375428,0.00018402364,0.00016995709,0.00040730144,0.00042470908,0.00035996598,0.000060919305,0.00017743032,0.00014273381],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003587531,0.00041565776,0.00054864405,0.020754332,0.0001713345,0.000084944535,0.024622858,0.000012055323,0.0027286366,0.9094337,0.01145194,0.029740002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032372546,0.000054865195,0.0004980859,0.0052285795,0.00025635387,0.000005504461,0.00006834242,1.97428e-7,0.000059854297,0.0010224589,0.9922388,0.0002432008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10650782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3956729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9807869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002783666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008426912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.899442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236249296","doi":"10.5703/1288284316502","title":"The Long Arm of the Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Purdue Pharma (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.028009260210386074,"score_gpt":0.3265348339630232,"score_spread":0.2985255737526371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236249296","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025355266,0.0001088874,0.000006618803,0.009882323,0.00047631632,0.000081272156,3.2731023e-7,0.000008513817,0.96408045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98462117,0.000022361468,0.000001946278,0.00011793598,0.000230558,0.0000017254658,1.0061371e-8,0.0000014241773,0.01500286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995774,0.000035289413,0.000066550834,0.000041889918,0.00018379132,0.000095097996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995564,0.000058756697,0.000093148716,0.0002186515,0.000054369088,0.000018663464],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004532318,0.000021890355,0.00004138508,0.0000014236258,0.0032198427,0.00018471474,0.00056250143,0.000023023433,0.000043007458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002365853,0.000009186233,0.00003270016,0.00002401891,0.0006330083,0.00011166667,0.000058789574,0.00003422516,0.000012242513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.594808e-7,0.0000050820713,0.0053545865,0.0000021830842,0.0000031278355,1.03531896e-7,0.0013301041,9.68802e-8,0.000010790346,0.9906379,0.0010478541,0.0016072947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008216294,0.000011741035,0.030308032,0.00002682632,0.000006713048,1.56541e-7,0.003545436,0.0000022027366,0.0017353867,0.04588081,0.91833866,0.00006189505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12361386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22773159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9592659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000071944714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059664417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237249097","doi":"10.1037/e629382007-001","title":"Same-Sex Marriage in Canada: Evolution or Revolution?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"PsycEXTRA Dataset","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual revolution; Genealogy; Demography; History; Geography; Sociology; Gender studies; Human sexuality","score_opus":0.025429042485166038,"score_gpt":0.31165501054295563,"score_spread":0.2862259680577896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237249097","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000020964986,0.0011305811,0.000011371256,0.0008076305,0.0016154132,0.00067184784,0.9952755,0.000028824741,0.0004378845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016448364,0.0008488018,0.00002617664,0.0005236331,0.0013310529,0.000077554534,0.9952823,0.000019948955,0.00024571182],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996175,0.00034624228,0.000748838,0.00072963594,0.0011438146,0.0008565028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825704,0.00016613452,0.00038556612,0.0008007907,0.00007705288,0.00031344043],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010122819,0.00038261487,0.0006239081,0.00021261041,0.00051136746,0.00013874052,0.0011584929,0.00042877035,0.0021168299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007225984,0.0003527354,0.000057530073,0.00087591965,0.00020665905,0.00043970963,0.00013298482,0.0006688522,0.000337912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041393883,0.00007224314,0.00014305126,0.00021941563,0.000021679705,0.00017526257,0.00008846171,0.000008458037,3.935181e-7,0.00027110538,0.99881196,0.00014658843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039692517,0.000028602013,0.0003366274,0.00031173645,0.00004553355,0.0000069039534,0.0008828309,0.0000010250322,4.277065e-7,0.0007005908,0.99680865,0.0004801576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9995197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013412042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052214023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018633444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237988032","doi":"10.29173/alr403","title":"An Introduction to Various Issues Surrounding the Ownership of Storage/Pipeline Gas","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Energy","funders":"","keywords":"Pipeline (software); Insolvency; Leasehold estate; Law and economics; Business; Natural gas; Class (philosophy); Economics; Law; Political science; Computer science; Finance; Engineering","score_opus":0.028446587593752366,"score_gpt":0.35086296297317937,"score_spread":0.322416375379427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237988032","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06584055,0.25421903,0.0018296577,0.39874622,0.0055252905,0.004982541,0.0000059827757,0.00021474498,0.268636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98673576,0.0054207165,0.000095661846,0.0022966084,0.003334351,0.000010607985,0.000004225149,0.000012777521,0.0020893048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984908,0.00027075477,0.0003892066,0.00021763962,0.0003573809,0.00027418914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989579,0.00025110928,0.00017218379,0.00030150887,0.00019367106,0.00012367568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041609863,0.00009967101,0.00030174406,0.000023295463,0.00038086734,0.000058925772,0.00033310705,0.000053013904,0.00022718219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001017701,0.00006423613,0.00006490291,0.0005879183,0.00014217904,0.00028634138,0.000021914571,0.00009824804,0.00005932125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014210244,0.000074111624,0.00032803946,0.0008420565,0.000020006071,0.0000020579037,0.008807188,0.0000040177897,0.00014353494,0.92965055,0.018180437,0.04193378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030961044,0.00004194278,0.000041779163,0.00043666578,0.00003947676,0.0000016918844,0.00045729356,9.948698e-7,0.0001028142,0.0005408254,0.9982111,0.00009443969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2431534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23730233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98003066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057574216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061006333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7766149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239831365","doi":"10.1037/e513792004-001","title":"Gay rights, marriage, and the Supreme Court","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"PsycEXTRA Dataset","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Gay rights; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02721996703560543,"score_gpt":0.3259147545694934,"score_spread":0.298694787533888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239831365","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000025552324,0.0026209122,0.000005682498,0.0021651771,0.0013620697,0.0007322803,0.9893792,0.000030304951,0.0037018075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000085702326,0.0020369135,0.000020926276,0.001247651,0.001345996,0.00007020951,0.9947284,0.000014916167,0.00044931014],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966858,0.00080573076,0.00048238807,0.0006005192,0.00083805,0.0005875365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796605,0.00045765817,0.0003253248,0.0009128788,0.000081798564,0.00025630646],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025179335,0.00036440775,0.00058266235,0.00008411769,0.0014831941,0.00059575174,0.0011101436,0.00042459468,0.0021343222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044885828,0.0002351205,0.00008775982,0.0003115327,0.0014193992,0.0003239205,0.000137247,0.00057948724,0.00056422234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042506395,0.000041415096,0.000003621505,0.00008759841,0.0000622458,0.000021945354,0.00015854536,7.759527e-8,1.6438032e-7,0.004922282,0.99459213,0.00006749453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073685305,0.000017655611,0.0000041437493,0.00006848794,0.00016723952,0.00001015031,0.00014630595,3.9350434e-7,7.8944964e-7,0.0040074275,0.99448925,0.0003512956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10363816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0426628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060975358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053309715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026770995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239987928","doi":"10.29173/alr72","title":"Recent Judicial Developments of Interest to Energy Lawyers","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receivership; Freehold; Duty; Energy sector; Judicial opinion; Energy (signal processing); Actuarial science; Business; Economics; Law; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.058509107799009856,"score_gpt":0.3200448532691088,"score_spread":0.26153574547009895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239987928","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050600455,0.039106175,0.000016707221,0.02061367,0.00079730555,0.00096164685,0.0000019014336,0.00003112296,0.9334114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9229056,0.060872164,0.00009428165,0.012931595,0.00024473472,0.00012799853,0.000004848481,0.00001590247,0.002802866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987724,0.00013431709,0.00041678015,0.00018774334,0.00022231822,0.00026645602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991658,0.000112501184,0.0001427247,0.00014484105,0.0002454398,0.000188712],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032543836,0.00010577685,0.00035167733,0.000021824835,0.00017385963,0.000037983355,0.00031168893,0.00005620362,0.0013556284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045934238,0.00008826321,0.000059579743,0.0004188345,0.00010534761,0.00020815834,0.0000677253,0.000047355505,0.0004982532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026148,0.000045241595,0.00023143274,0.00041931833,0.00003410072,6.7857104e-7,0.0011071259,7.8390286e-8,0.000035833462,0.7964617,0.045793235,0.15586865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045014513,0.000020906235,0.000073296964,0.0017983055,0.000015012452,3.2282028e-7,0.00005711964,7.7194755e-8,0.00009804202,0.0010331643,0.99674284,0.000115892755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41291168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29058504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9509496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005874783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016061078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240039888","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.18615","title":"Nova Growth Corp. v. Kepinski <i>2014 CarswellOnt 6335, 2014 ONSC 2763 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice [Commercial List], May 12, 2014</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Download; Economic Justice; CITES; Law; Humanities; Politics; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.02529310089975424,"score_gpt":0.2676874636780195,"score_spread":0.24239436277826526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240039888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2587857,0.107267626,0.00041021922,0.011813761,0.005678198,0.002752757,0.00015290815,0.00021315594,0.6129257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9331099,0.059523005,0.00027714597,0.0042787176,0.0010856575,0.000023076265,0.000020933216,0.000038395203,0.0016432011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979273,0.00019684284,0.0007960383,0.00044529844,0.00014981779,0.00048469257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859965,0.00023212035,0.00044779372,0.00030849033,0.00016118148,0.0002507906],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020054486,0.00027060352,0.0010054483,0.00003964811,0.0005720572,0.00014905722,0.00038635495,0.00018487046,0.00044045848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017486209,0.0002637863,0.00017680532,0.00006710909,0.00045030267,0.00042085233,0.00010598521,0.00023013135,0.0001893767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000678302,0.0002613829,0.038525958,0.010606512,0.000238481,0.000006663044,0.007992,0.000015488009,0.00008427729,0.6946017,0.22999586,0.017603856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030171356,0.000076791024,0.0011936353,0.00054872304,0.00038140436,0.0000061462742,0.00014412761,0.000010086425,0.000038671853,0.00060826994,0.9963272,0.00036322753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37646917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5031607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7663313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000182011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031101963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240456741","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.17911","title":"Dennis v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming CorpCase No. C55923, [2013] O.J. No. 3468; 2013 ON.C. LEXIS 3610; 2013 ONCA 501 (Ontario Court of Appeal, July 31, 2013)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Appeal; Lexis; Art; Humanities; Download; Advertising; Art history; Political science; Law; Computer science; Business; World Wide Web; Philosophy; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.024288057881616046,"score_gpt":0.24798813914238224,"score_spread":0.22370008126076618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240456741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7842849,0.07050489,0.000034995355,0.006401114,0.0022592822,0.0031154922,0.00007422667,0.00012313951,0.133202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5976018,0.340701,0.001896497,0.009856938,0.002100434,0.0003038131,0.00007490333,0.00016166731,0.04730298],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973988,0.000112549795,0.0009914382,0.0006433587,0.00017371618,0.0006801655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799204,0.0001958461,0.0006909554,0.00039937298,0.00031166547,0.00041011872],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00105526,0.00041529624,0.0011449333,0.00007144591,0.0006924028,0.00036170337,0.00035646913,0.00024794313,0.0005702618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007525318,0.00039138572,0.00017075449,0.000090861344,0.00048948557,0.00093286013,0.00015846039,0.00037296998,0.0013267183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010270541,0.00060538016,0.018561667,0.008630099,0.0006287248,0.000033348024,0.016454015,0.000042469677,0.000066132954,0.021114217,0.90626794,0.02749328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042625662,0.00016312774,0.0011190345,0.001422915,0.00014009791,0.000012770083,0.00013776986,0.000031623094,0.000007332527,0.0004828893,0.9955523,0.0005038916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91632056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9030843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27019614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041107743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000567927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241150343","doi":"10.1093/acref/9780195301731.013.45917","title":"Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"African American Studies Center","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.0316661190525865,"score_gpt":0.31537282752406665,"score_spread":0.28370670847148016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241150343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00072242314,0.028287653,0.0000036625165,0.009827573,0.0031256035,0.00052121095,0.00029913094,0.00024551537,0.95696723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42934388,0.251351,0.0000995136,0.0055587143,0.00987835,0.000087764354,0.000096192955,0.00016691392,0.30341768],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99547863,0.00039928718,0.0006724343,0.00079582917,0.001409034,0.0012447914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99738353,0.000343568,0.00087819365,0.00042033245,0.0005696142,0.0004047487],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033177616,0.00060642336,0.0015571114,0.00014854629,0.00097440317,0.0001279782,0.00077727274,0.00015961671,0.00008222602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006827567,0.000514067,0.00022883188,0.000995589,0.0013797677,0.000119348486,0.00019249647,0.00056866725,0.00005511928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018154708,0.000058070906,0.0008406647,0.00010504882,0.00034592208,0.00006700208,0.0069002,2.697776e-7,5.209384e-8,0.0002981997,0.94113845,0.05022796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016080699,0.00009490317,0.0003081007,0.00044786528,0.000089432324,0.0000020703062,0.053330593,1.4751333e-7,5.8746264e-7,0.00013233944,0.94485724,0.00057592837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93199503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94357634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65354955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001481854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029594176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242191756","doi":"10.1163/2213-2996_flg_com_323010","title":"Canada - Legal System","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Foreign Law Guide","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.016399944525404112,"score_gpt":0.27733520371517756,"score_spread":0.26093525918977345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242191756","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000012035815,0.00023519962,0.000001942266,0.00012477749,0.0016520798,0.0003197519,0.5866182,0.000035945883,0.41101092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012133574,0.00004805403,0.000011121222,0.0014383812,0.004153515,0.00004754107,0.96514857,0.000034696073,0.016984541],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970595,0.00016085789,0.0005408827,0.00043165684,0.0011653088,0.0006417663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985297,0.00011970179,0.00034652784,0.00053334516,0.0002312975,0.00023943528],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066330214,0.00029129404,0.0005739164,0.000043060027,0.000749232,0.0002862377,0.000954713,0.0004155261,0.00039911692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001500936,0.0002682904,0.00011430487,0.0002185243,0.00017623525,0.00023267794,0.00010702547,0.00032635382,0.0004924509],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002845022,0.0000050117096,0.0000019059493,0.00028869422,0.000027007754,0.00006307542,0.000016485306,0.0000026061637,9.950411e-8,0.28576407,0.7138187,0.00000946542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010126258,0.000020910682,9.607105e-7,0.00027298753,0.00005161437,0.0000054201478,0.000849695,0.0000011139483,0.0000025529364,0.00014727979,0.998198,0.0003482591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.999682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39402637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001157335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007812556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242221348","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.17910","title":"Ontario First Nations Limited Partnership v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corp. <i>Case No. CV-12-461369, [2013] O.J. No. 2800; 2013 ON.C. LEXIS 2992; 2013 ONSC 4166 (Ontario Court of Justice, June 17, 2013)</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Lexis; General partnership; Download; Law; Political science; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.03532596529928986,"score_gpt":0.2548350094174521,"score_spread":0.21950904411816222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242221348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53815705,0.03196847,0.000044476365,0.013292249,0.0036903846,0.0045770723,0.00011117318,0.00017326183,0.40798587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78959787,0.08097516,0.0010124065,0.0057597253,0.0013982676,0.00037789557,0.00011985593,0.00011797206,0.12064082],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700415,0.00013436144,0.0011678004,0.0007210333,0.00022420836,0.00074845966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972643,0.00057298684,0.0007781727,0.00046252884,0.00044396837,0.00047802008],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010981743,0.00048556158,0.0011453087,0.00013300001,0.001630016,0.00043537022,0.0003438523,0.00027789344,0.0020020884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015911736,0.00047875525,0.00019423178,0.00015837274,0.0005177096,0.0012413335,0.0001504711,0.0005078805,0.0005617527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115217226,0.00084885466,0.055840366,0.008835652,0.00084833446,0.000097673816,0.036803737,0.00021361293,0.00001554058,0.053608105,0.83927625,0.0034966234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052364345,0.00012539933,0.0018250709,0.0016018118,0.0004385128,0.00004177571,0.00032855777,0.000059386428,0.0000028166533,0.0002481096,0.9942119,0.0005929785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9798733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28734502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069976243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077235344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242254569","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.18111","title":"Michigan vs. The Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians <i>Case No. 13-1438, 2013 WL 6645395 (U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, December 18, 2013)</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribe; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01944810771552718,"score_gpt":0.2532683744881838,"score_spread":0.2338202667726566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242254569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60445845,0.17214102,0.00016137229,0.012801144,0.0018780247,0.0031996835,0.00033657218,0.00010584222,0.20491788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9065859,0.09039402,0.000037911348,0.0019865409,0.00039020757,0.00002092864,0.000010431999,0.000023558438,0.00055052876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981999,0.00021976343,0.0007817109,0.0003053975,0.00012661346,0.00036665713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839234,0.00031241827,0.0006412244,0.00033663266,0.00015708427,0.00016028374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020904415,0.00020440809,0.0008215646,0.0000313632,0.00046069588,0.00008997242,0.00034026027,0.00014643391,0.00011389836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020568042,0.00015836091,0.0001522902,0.00013999452,0.00046702696,0.00028376695,0.000077255536,0.00016411504,0.000058533195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014024161,0.0007766507,0.019341493,0.029360287,0.0011014275,0.000043741857,0.02870173,0.00017175647,0.00021687175,0.6875134,0.12756726,0.10506514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026000332,0.00006431377,0.00016138608,0.00061636727,0.00016253171,0.000019128867,0.00031702634,0.000031005944,0.000035500358,0.0016266969,0.996466,0.00024004221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034381807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059495285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86889875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000302099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015518702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97204834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242279659","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.161112","title":"<i>R. v. Trins</i> <i>Case No. A10-7330-30Z; [2012] A.J. No. 600; 2012 ABPC 156; 2012 AB.C. LEXIS 1108 (Alberta Provincial Court, June 11, 2012)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01901146512330852,"score_gpt":0.26681222964717793,"score_spread":0.2478007645238694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242279659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026556974,0.46973142,0.00009575649,0.009640594,0.011981752,0.004012718,0.00035763773,0.00032546304,0.47729766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.318409,0.37697786,0.0010313742,0.023507735,0.027507024,0.0005566063,0.00018299432,0.000392992,0.25143442],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99629426,0.00027538204,0.0011590375,0.0006580694,0.00021383396,0.0013994157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973233,0.00031309802,0.00071309437,0.00052647357,0.00028125386,0.0008428257],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025864865,0.00054658897,0.0012714138,0.00006979281,0.0013585982,0.0003315109,0.00047989172,0.00037916822,0.0009359411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030574962,0.0005187193,0.0002968357,0.00023104789,0.0004943344,0.0045969677,0.00021137236,0.00036446852,0.0022072587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009305061,0.0005946443,0.0024801218,0.0056157447,0.00025145858,0.00004049033,0.0028901598,0.0000030672368,0.000038753147,0.18862928,0.78188574,0.017477486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048093914,0.00004565854,0.000053703712,0.00048360854,0.00027021085,0.000097752185,0.00012075761,0.0000065847075,0.000011032614,0.00023900086,0.9974881,0.00070267566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03926157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12580943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29185203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022599335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003637058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243198121","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14412","title":"Dennis v. Ontario Lottery &amp; Gaming Corp., <i>[2010] O.J. No. 1223 (Can.)</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Download; Volume (thermodynamics); Law and economics; Political science; Advertising; Economics; Business; Computer science; World Wide Web; Physics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.02510372144971111,"score_gpt":0.2576572364137912,"score_spread":0.23255351496408005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243198121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6117949,0.023607602,0.000053515054,0.004635555,0.0055107954,0.001104937,0.000033719076,0.00018322993,0.35307574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9194669,0.043669056,0.0011452001,0.013592587,0.0022953302,0.00006396515,0.000028206787,0.0000611568,0.019677574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986954,0.00004800391,0.00042839503,0.0003415993,0.00008359841,0.0004030391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912024,0.000090663154,0.00023060793,0.00025218632,0.00009129458,0.00021500462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095986563,0.00018009917,0.0004829632,0.000024372992,0.0006675393,0.00024317163,0.00025169915,0.00014588883,0.0003807448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012885423,0.00017711852,0.000096520125,0.00006940767,0.00027593604,0.000389783,0.00007683706,0.00031504902,0.00030584037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034096138,0.00027380986,0.06875778,0.007213497,0.00032462785,0.000022877779,0.022718713,0.000005273786,0.00088910584,0.77395433,0.048058096,0.0777478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010470157,0.000011476022,0.000488475,0.00029276282,0.0000593153,0.0000074897844,0.00004400922,0.0000013463244,0.000009479826,0.0010530683,0.99767965,0.00024819904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23776421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8005949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94962156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001031604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025306595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7673116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244012758","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19215","title":"R. v. Miller <i>[2014] B.C.J. No. 2121, 2014 BCSC 1561, Docket: X075613 (British Columbia Supreme Court, April 4, 2014)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Miller; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02322293283140335,"score_gpt":0.2536600518538323,"score_spread":0.23043711902242892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244012758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05152747,0.4143629,0.000041384803,0.004110893,0.00423663,0.002058416,0.0001955231,0.0002816176,0.52318513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30434167,0.6457562,0.000602376,0.014270823,0.0041465275,0.00015980226,0.0000807375,0.00012488312,0.030516988],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979257,0.00016839843,0.0006428711,0.0005160022,0.00017549259,0.0005715215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985587,0.000084427564,0.0003173463,0.00029683555,0.000276921,0.00046579665],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019793569,0.00019893247,0.0007748758,0.000017027838,0.00070736767,0.00086449407,0.00036115927,0.0001903485,0.00071098265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019755926,0.00026583494,0.00013317826,0.00008235846,0.00036453895,0.00068742136,0.00012055232,0.000181339,0.0010795116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037628802,0.00003628974,0.0026752127,0.0007158168,0.000043555523,0.000004975186,0.0004631643,0.0000024071799,0.0000018689834,0.0052224044,0.9859044,0.004926141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031940368,0.00003997407,0.00013225892,0.0005017027,0.000086686436,0.000013749356,0.0001836718,0.000011832482,0.0000013376637,0.0017256263,0.9966089,0.0003748609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2695343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29702497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49266815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014830318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029113225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244639184","doi":"10.5195/jlc.2018.158","title":"Front Matter","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Law and Commerce","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Ghana; Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; Grove City College; Temple University; Washington and Lee University; Duquesne University; Santa Clara University; West Virginia University; Stonehill College; University of Akron; Ball State University; Adams State University; Georgetown University; Carnegie Mellon University; University of Louisville; Syracuse University; University of Pittsburgh; University of Dayton; Michigan State University; University of Notre Dame; Yeshiva University; East Tennessee State University; George Washington University; University of Oxford; Florida International University; York University; University of Miami; Northwestern University; University of Pennsylvania; Ohio State University; Yale University; Texas Woman's University; University of South Carolina; Gannon University; San Francisco State University; Carleton College; College of Engineering, Michigan State University; Princeton University; Brown University; Tulane University; Case Western Reserve University; University of Minnesota; Wake Forest University; Boston College; Harvard University","keywords":"Notice; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.024288054281286033,"score_gpt":0.312575618259725,"score_spread":0.28828756397843897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244639184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00063883443,0.008832921,0.000049533508,0.003610666,0.0036879205,0.00008467333,0.0000098684695,0.0000021575715,0.9830834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2987193,0.002790524,0.00003659918,0.0071005523,0.0046508876,0.0000012791908,0.0000027140316,0.000023578152,0.68667454],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988373,0.00015325034,0.00036614126,0.00009334586,0.0003626641,0.00018728529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898046,0.00009672434,0.0005110064,0.00008722535,0.00020020577,0.00012436649],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005027735,0.00012015896,0.00045790384,0.000044025153,0.00025208708,0.00018959571,0.0002737829,0.0002305371,0.0067146737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013628844,0.00009158595,0.000113794864,0.00003603337,0.00014699699,0.0002225283,0.000039204904,0.00040844388,0.0058139754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001737082,0.000021617483,0.00013403781,0.00009993796,0.00004919171,0.0000048842144,0.0024715,0.0000014491475,0.000004742402,0.005732049,0.99094164,0.0005215834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014623327,0.00006109689,0.00007199022,0.00029782057,0.000029956213,0.000010994078,0.0005466879,1.5957971e-7,0.0000035031758,0.000334665,0.9983777,0.000119229444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00970225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008012157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29808047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004915634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024843818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244833696","doi":"10.29173/alr474","title":"Recent Regulatory and Legislative Developments of Interest to Energy Lawyers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legislation; Energy law; Politics; Political science; Energy (signal processing); Law and economics; Law; Environmental law; Economics; Business","score_opus":0.0563274225112046,"score_gpt":0.3162559533531349,"score_spread":0.2599285308419303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244833696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0096441675,0.09973148,0.000044023513,0.027204147,0.00048083637,0.00067794026,0.000005110862,0.000027165508,0.8621851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9000387,0.09227426,0.000046124977,0.0025451807,0.00007405629,0.000025113834,6.658979e-7,0.000008618139,0.0049872342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991155,0.0001291834,0.00026883566,0.00017390435,0.00014606214,0.00016646582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993375,0.00017903004,0.00011966462,0.00010632786,0.00012751285,0.00012996602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038455374,0.0000820846,0.00026286306,0.000016138521,0.00011594927,0.0000127356725,0.0001430035,0.000040281862,0.00015489238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040205813,0.00005279197,0.000029282815,0.00018879077,0.0001759632,0.00017593011,0.000055759923,0.000020433292,0.000029786874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003961007,0.000011589372,0.0003074069,0.00020136856,0.000022939921,4.802041e-7,0.0011965404,4.2802832e-9,0.00006893626,0.82066107,0.004067482,0.17345823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063774445,0.000019048535,0.00013507732,0.003786136,0.00001188804,3.9082659e-7,0.000031451724,7.9910984e-9,0.00022591089,0.00079056167,0.9948466,0.000089142806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040531877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15185739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9907791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004997823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011228532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9658573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245503644","doi":"10.5840/em2002271223","title":"Canada and Same-Sex Marriage","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Medics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.05662054415782617,"score_gpt":0.3135205864392081,"score_spread":0.2569000422813819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245503644","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06723937,0.008227626,0.00018596304,0.20053384,0.004370245,0.00043152613,0.000035576973,0.00016730254,0.7188086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98141205,0.0012303938,0.000041781546,0.005336666,0.00091139384,0.00000346636,8.7994795e-7,0.0000072916996,0.011056068],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858826,0.00015013236,0.00013864021,0.00013682064,0.0007496836,0.000236437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904287,0.000522383,0.00005252872,0.00008711549,0.00009193203,0.00020315625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012789269,0.00006570357,0.00012046148,0.000015946627,0.00058128056,0.000056216842,0.00014163468,0.00019588583,0.00043320807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022717023,0.00006042937,0.000013235758,0.00015025075,0.00029051816,0.00008225241,0.000028419754,0.00050924177,0.000011996734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041289272,0.000048174974,0.011279293,0.00024306828,0.000050744544,0.0001381766,0.2894235,0.0000022035367,0.000032579792,0.24990943,0.40575117,0.043117553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086353015,0.000009705197,0.00022603915,0.000031346157,0.0000065247336,0.0000011753816,0.0043055383,0.000024668385,0.000010192935,0.0045895115,0.9906143,0.00009467571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9776999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.990371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9141727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008175254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010539124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47433245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245946685","doi":"10.2307/3504872","title":"10.2307/3504872","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Perspective (graphical); Philosophy of law; Separate but equal; Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Politics; Mathematics; Civil rights; Comparative law","score_opus":0.008365380806297822,"score_gpt":0.2249569230201606,"score_spread":0.2165915422138628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245946685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010003225,0.000087724584,3.0116095e-7,0.0010962982,0.0000064768324,0.0001445733,0.0000035095807,0.0001267477,0.99753404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015408892,9.501237e-7,0.000014056585,0.00011159034,0.0005794363,0.000010052829,0.0000013547316,0.000008483892,0.9838652],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991837,0.000055562166,0.00011429836,0.00014162478,0.00025204272,0.00025273493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996333,0.000035791352,0.000019927735,0.000100182675,0.00005258008,0.00015819348],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002679407,0.00006485906,0.000110561494,0.000028477334,0.00031924105,0.0000884288,0.00019726185,0.000056822795,0.99034166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008400347,0.00006183182,0.000034590645,0.00029309723,0.000059114886,0.00015173001,0.000013724593,0.000047202535,0.9756644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021143376,0.000029246576,0.0000011971892,0.0000047885064,0.0000070963456,0.0000037300886,0.0006914845,0.000008865601,0.000013062477,0.00015120965,0.2628156,0.7362526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005500513,0.00003775669,0.000019700541,0.000011917175,0.000004280799,3.5969873e-7,0.000017423878,0.0000026682023,0.0000090377325,0.00006305694,0.999682,0.000096771124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005548506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034283323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7368664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003659245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009238413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8387719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246137496","doi":"10.18276/aie.2018.42-06","title":"Arguments in the dispute over legalizing euthanasia and physician assisted suicide - part II","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analiza i Egzystencja","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Argument (complex analysis); Immorality; Slippery slope; Autonomy; Premise; Assisted suicide; Value of life; Law; Right to die; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Sociology; Medicine; Political science; Philosophy; Morality; Epistemology; Economics","score_opus":0.09478087885277818,"score_gpt":0.37202013082383756,"score_spread":0.27723925197105936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246137496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8112559,0.00094017177,0.00003550069,0.0021965904,0.0005254074,0.00043251863,0.000010250906,0.00006392604,0.18453974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955601,0.000065435335,0.000011225475,0.0019502046,0.0011631072,0.000018802439,0.0000054096054,0.000012611506,0.0012130992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814916,0.00031161975,0.0003008881,0.00030961641,0.0004681904,0.0004605065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937713,0.00007462738,0.00014707904,0.00021059516,0.000094177594,0.00009638725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010248132,0.00015133769,0.00023736396,0.00007556115,0.0011954721,0.0002501063,0.0003466592,0.00009451588,0.00006951816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000114985414,0.00011102977,0.000061018985,0.00073437905,0.0003888025,0.0004958242,0.00007474108,0.00012282323,0.000027738099],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096936434,0.0006563609,0.3319319,0.00017999047,0.00028372527,0.00012971043,0.19981845,0.0000028360025,0.00088765315,0.3734132,0.059289314,0.033309955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006702308,0.00022256136,0.1334596,0.00043698988,0.00007421351,0.0000054475804,0.015102733,0.00007212927,0.000113378366,0.0054347217,0.8439182,0.0004897831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056854453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05780673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7846289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005987073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010119102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9593858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246474693","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvggx1x1.9","title":"“They Are Genetically Incapable” of Defending Québécois Values:","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"MQUP eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology","score_opus":0.02883487945326004,"score_gpt":0.2655839527166406,"score_spread":0.23674907326338054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246474693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001402516,0.0010282674,0.000028778779,0.000080747704,0.00069898664,0.000499504,0.000032829703,0.000081289436,0.9961471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39197317,0.00009845657,0.00006022764,0.00013200312,0.0008717249,0.0000069879657,0.000002938228,0.00006071693,0.60679376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978966,0.000067104455,0.0005402985,0.00041571158,0.0006869801,0.00039331694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844134,0.00016055915,0.00059317594,0.0003528408,0.00029172172,0.0001603686],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058893743,0.0002983701,0.0006787762,0.00014473607,0.0003186283,0.000082168146,0.00051610626,0.0005871402,0.00032841024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012378179,0.00028481527,0.0002437664,0.000020197791,0.00028416133,0.000056362092,0.000118800264,0.0003303181,0.00027215373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019536934,0.0000122712145,0.00034834113,0.00038335432,0.00012673702,0.000013467093,0.013237295,0.0000028636352,0.0001403005,0.9774664,0.0010855467,0.0071639093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017787672,0.000080768565,0.00005751711,0.0010314606,0.00010982954,0.0000015592565,0.001400499,0.0000017339954,0.000080688675,0.09413559,0.9024277,0.0004948247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041564558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053721193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9013421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015775603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247324961","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_3868","title":"Same-Sex Marriage in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Genealogy; Gender studies; History; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.01637867172896089,"score_gpt":0.23615409189971986,"score_spread":0.21977542017075896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247324961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000043247554,0.00027265528,0.000012837345,0.00083029614,0.00062101637,0.00018646565,0.0000084340845,0.000026479629,0.9979986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16132708,0.00010010108,0.000007562852,0.00072804565,0.0008257609,0.0000035684297,0.0000034375325,0.000017840104,0.8369866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987147,0.000030195653,0.000264266,0.00023042221,0.00049317046,0.00026726763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994702,0.00010143589,0.000114611576,0.00013524243,0.000052552143,0.00012596487],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003561958,0.00014951413,0.00033647448,0.000051235962,0.00013780096,0.000048989317,0.00025843608,0.00020704172,0.004023512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066238164,0.00013725305,0.000043457887,0.000031636962,0.00007163406,0.000043349548,0.000034350305,0.00021098733,0.00013025006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017444514,0.0000013144283,0.00025529455,0.00003326272,0.000009563678,0.000036516125,0.0006019848,8.587123e-7,3.1212411e-7,0.94139147,0.049580317,0.008087354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052959596,0.0000052027226,0.000026244734,0.00007600339,0.000004386355,2.6344222e-7,0.0003487552,0.0000011396713,0.0000011432475,0.01955529,0.9797322,0.00019639415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99943936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99994576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9301519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073213293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037734443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99688697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247898333","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.161113","title":"<i>Moreira v. Ontario Lottery &amp; Gaming Corp.</i> <i>Case No. CV-08-352327, CV-08-356748, [2012] O.J. No. 1879, 2012 ON.C. LEXIS 3717; 2012 ONSC 2304 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, April 30, 2012)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Lexis; Download; Humanities; Art; Mathematics; Computer science; Philosophy; Statistics; World Wide Web; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03858182301488459,"score_gpt":0.2729170242922233,"score_spread":0.23433520127733873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247898333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48615554,0.20668763,0.00018907318,0.0014023877,0.009749445,0.0032321338,0.00034675683,0.00027313665,0.2919639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7546938,0.09187115,0.002795151,0.01842861,0.009545951,0.00036788642,0.00023663693,0.00041221175,0.12164858],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99514055,0.00027911918,0.0017237825,0.0008700785,0.0003861788,0.0016002691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964254,0.00042655552,0.0010524088,0.0008343134,0.00041434923,0.00084700604],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030517743,0.00076874084,0.001930735,0.0001237093,0.0012972751,0.00033260856,0.0006235776,0.00046667623,0.003096593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021792126,0.0007526666,0.00043617218,0.00021999348,0.00072219106,0.0034745033,0.0002724437,0.0007667385,0.0031995187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006600228,0.003209026,0.045251917,0.031361356,0.0020940993,0.0002851196,0.055763304,0.000099060475,0.00085121766,0.15648001,0.66231036,0.04163452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063409,0.00011373074,0.00057237316,0.0015457178,0.0007846008,0.00014226977,0.00027953184,0.0000032370872,0.000024477455,0.00013257295,0.994839,0.0009283873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2982831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5976616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33252868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008752225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010205801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248841446","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.16611","title":"Between Giuseppe Tarascio and Her Majesty, the Queen[2012] F.C.J. No. 127, 2012 FCA 30, 2012 Fed.C.C. LEXIS 134 (Federal Court of Appeal, Toronto, Ontario; January 26, 2012)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Appeal; Lexis; Art; Humanities; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Botany","score_opus":0.02658409602326493,"score_gpt":0.27696495111278485,"score_spread":0.2503808550895199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248841446","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1038089,0.6656404,0.00005777543,0.0057191495,0.002056973,0.0020137571,0.00008934206,0.00010984262,0.22050384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8053827,0.17092519,0.00039596518,0.0029226993,0.0036632796,0.00008275687,0.00002870111,0.00009015853,0.016508533],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978208,0.00020222044,0.00073129276,0.0003510444,0.0001686289,0.00072603906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998576,0.00018635317,0.00047324575,0.00031329502,0.00010356381,0.00034753585],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002065146,0.00031111782,0.000898407,0.000019725132,0.0008679233,0.00019468082,0.00033602185,0.00021746676,0.0008966352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043533,0.0002454228,0.00014370288,0.000056369707,0.00049165223,0.0027769175,0.0001717217,0.00024166459,0.00017878812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090820366,0.00048287484,0.25015202,0.0068921302,0.0010347128,0.00000349508,0.021953968,0.0000043075274,0.000021862745,0.22174306,0.4470388,0.050581932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021308348,0.00006480075,0.010676818,0.0004309099,0.00019133299,0.00000350246,0.00028633297,0.0000011966142,0.000003488776,0.00048411856,0.9873069,0.0003375014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32839006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36322024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70157385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024436883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023567294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249162492","doi":"10.1089/glr.2007.11611","title":"Treyes v. Ontario Lottery &amp; Gaming Corp., No. 05-CV-290238PD1 [2007] (O.S.C.J. July 11, 2007)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Download; Advertising; Volume (thermodynamics); Art; Business; Political science; Humanities; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Physics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.04161001636919018,"score_gpt":0.32459618465748963,"score_spread":0.2829861682882995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249162492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007181341,0.16508213,0.00078627426,0.00148713,0.0052908994,0.0015232043,0.00001331489,0.0004276032,0.8182081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46841714,0.092340626,0.0053329766,0.05113154,0.020421885,0.00024326191,0.00011196479,0.0003753348,0.36162525],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99624693,0.00023255967,0.0009968104,0.0005830941,0.0008837065,0.0010568923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796003,0.00033882353,0.00047682636,0.0004558682,0.0003971217,0.00037130245],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003971976,0.00036426264,0.0008518498,0.000071974464,0.0009835671,0.00022040267,0.00057491893,0.00022406831,0.0017113918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068342045,0.00033148902,0.00029020806,0.00053678115,0.00036352838,0.00059663545,0.000097744676,0.00037796528,0.0021971634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006762292,0.0005388522,0.013030391,0.012796518,0.0002492198,0.00038290856,0.016021209,0.000004659324,0.0002994397,0.13350658,0.74105966,0.08204297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017592685,0.000029851013,0.00074583525,0.00511553,0.00009221022,0.000009517821,0.00008678728,2.9226652e-7,0.000015511247,0.00024508315,0.99305,0.00043347589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33954564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5775922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46123582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048617154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000458413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249754693","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20115","title":"Kalra v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corp. <i>[2015] O.J. No. 4153, 2015 ONSC 4983; Court File No.: CV-14-4450-00 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, August 6, 2015)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Economic Justice; Download; Law; Political science; Federal court; Library science; Computer science; Supreme court; Economics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.019604268381198654,"score_gpt":0.2578478612331971,"score_spread":0.23824359285199842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249754693","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5031075,0.14908737,0.00011304235,0.010620558,0.0072352677,0.0040580463,0.0018153359,0.00029163042,0.32367125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7253011,0.14677174,0.0017185305,0.0089288,0.0034432434,0.00022981052,0.00017035838,0.00021328901,0.11322317],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763924,0.00010316486,0.0008912306,0.00057194877,0.0001846009,0.0006098114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815464,0.00032127002,0.000518415,0.00034048225,0.0003039303,0.00036127667],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012790544,0.00034911153,0.0010692857,0.000050117178,0.00056360086,0.00019587853,0.00032462034,0.0002222314,0.0025979297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021548693,0.00029000573,0.00013889077,0.00007989891,0.0005732435,0.0009105,0.00016088909,0.00023355593,0.00030139834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012685193,0.00025729794,0.030609412,0.0069036474,0.0003504801,0.000027930666,0.008083155,0.000002439298,0.0002955791,0.017751968,0.92548716,0.0101040825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049544574,0.00010241667,0.0015848291,0.0021090808,0.00027925102,0.000013939297,0.00017276355,0.000004320401,0.000014731559,0.0001279035,0.9946581,0.00043719602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35672948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63155735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2748279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046979517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084565603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250988032","doi":"10.1089/glre.2011.15308","title":"Between Clotilde Bérubé, Appellant, and Rational Entertainment Limited, RespondentINDEXED AS: Bérubé v. Rational Entertainment Ltd.Divisional Court File No. 09-DV-1559Ontario Superior Court of JusticeDivisional Court - Ottawa, Ontario","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entertainment; Law; Federal court; Political science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.027157987084553525,"score_gpt":0.2608420082777049,"score_spread":0.23368402119315135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250988032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9137692,0.013716751,0.00029703527,0.004454774,0.0018456574,0.0032237268,0.0019578573,0.00009529778,0.060639694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98348784,0.0075255404,0.0015145214,0.0017865757,0.00082931,0.000103139144,0.0006641284,0.000042487278,0.0040464257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971645,0.00017265031,0.0011142903,0.00059763796,0.00047733678,0.0004735958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821717,0.0004305999,0.00053079106,0.00021990942,0.00026478615,0.00033672195],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017170864,0.0003383892,0.00080976106,0.00008208471,0.0007055935,0.00016749543,0.0003210676,0.00018685476,0.0037344596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019528868,0.00032745174,0.00016479474,0.00007936048,0.00043177517,0.0005240172,0.00018532888,0.00026318233,0.00010620366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010311019,0.0015660934,0.40344548,0.0052207517,0.0018561722,0.0000632166,0.034763858,0.000045359324,0.00017977002,0.4501518,0.090277344,0.011399055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010521208,0.00029319228,0.054828204,0.0014797405,0.00036444332,0.000022237555,0.00061835867,0.000063388754,0.000036997288,0.0017532407,0.93890303,0.00058506895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05137284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08416731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84862566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036310643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008089108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251263544","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14913","title":"Chippewas of Mnjikaning First Nation v. Ontario (Native Affairs), <i>S.C.C.A. No. 91, C.S.C.R. no 91, File No.: 33613 (Supreme Court of Canada, July 8, 2010)</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.016435658769321584,"score_gpt":0.2192227205486977,"score_spread":0.2027870617793761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251263544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07582086,0.008091806,0.000008556136,0.0016127517,0.0043682395,0.0013760836,0.0006947914,0.00004774866,0.90797913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9744268,0.009883384,0.0006595184,0.00096221385,0.0011307261,0.000060240196,0.000090197806,0.000042917793,0.012743977],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985873,0.00004588775,0.00062373653,0.00027500006,0.0001601461,0.0003079394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841005,0.00019893081,0.0005962477,0.00018654314,0.00046374928,0.00014450871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008515379,0.00017439341,0.0006108366,0.000026483869,0.00043437112,0.000049124617,0.00024650877,0.00012396624,0.00083927164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005007968,0.00017321708,0.00008474952,0.00008870127,0.00024083762,0.0003801074,0.00006099767,0.00023647971,0.000040893254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001268954,0.00046534513,0.01205857,0.01878632,0.0007405639,0.000010501217,0.030590355,0.00009370548,0.0007495512,0.20948206,0.7201751,0.0067210435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015964548,0.000042262578,0.0005496463,0.0008122545,0.000056303204,0.0000011636216,0.00015895185,0.000035064833,0.00009063348,0.00021518079,0.9976583,0.0002205621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9338248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89860594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019585722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010405876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9189436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251984746","doi":"10.1353/hyp.2006.0066","title":"The Long Arc of Justice: Lesbian and Gay Marriage, Equality, and Rights (review)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hypatia","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Taboo; Economic Justice; Wonder; Gay rights; Sociology; Law; Mainstream; Gender studies; Politics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03715062602520627,"score_gpt":0.35797233449054605,"score_spread":0.3208217084653398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251984746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36368242,0.21033502,0.0009920307,0.005207529,0.0011801933,0.0012750864,0.00001710016,0.00008161174,0.417229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930292,0.0057512973,0.000030894014,0.00015525459,0.0002329578,0.0000024756396,6.2233124e-7,0.0000036157041,0.0007937066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990819,0.00011864741,0.00023502346,0.00011673927,0.00025220978,0.00019547947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992693,0.00033375205,0.00012508701,0.00009239532,0.0000877661,0.00009168202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019637968,0.00006259993,0.00014856804,0.000015616764,0.0005937617,0.000040882438,0.00010981582,0.000048718168,0.000029020459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027222338,0.00004056508,0.000020951527,0.00013255006,0.00035636715,0.00009843313,0.000039541555,0.000067072775,0.000004271671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065424734,0.00011984735,0.062576525,0.0047857063,0.000106254345,0.00003796013,0.022281181,3.4116277e-7,0.0003397198,0.69671565,0.019659555,0.19331186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000561567,0.00012700018,0.14449345,0.0015865712,0.0002836966,0.000007993653,0.0037998455,0.000008875494,0.00056623,0.03569208,0.81241727,0.0004554226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014223883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05704533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79275775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001230406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9923405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252216832","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.17415","title":"Majewski v. Complex Services Inc. <i>[2013] O.J. No. 396; 2013 ON.C. LEXIS 282; 2013 ONSC 690 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, January 30, 2013)</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Download; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Humanities; Art; Philosophy; Computer science; World Wide Web; Linguistics","score_opus":0.024848904152509753,"score_gpt":0.26179457320145105,"score_spread":0.2369456690489413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252216832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47839227,0.14629456,0.000013751006,0.019079093,0.0028628,0.004439752,0.00028808316,0.000214565,0.34841514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6195319,0.35537907,0.0008273075,0.015066516,0.0015707936,0.00023517651,0.00010584211,0.00009400767,0.0071893726],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997619,0.00013466172,0.0009491501,0.0005144489,0.00018734646,0.0005954211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998282,0.00016849951,0.00052658253,0.00039876378,0.00030429373,0.00031981835],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008533968,0.00035595437,0.0011091009,0.000056113407,0.00069761206,0.0002833777,0.00052329793,0.00020852279,0.0023428535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002676237,0.00032647353,0.00015225087,0.000109274,0.00040954154,0.0009936937,0.00015471631,0.00025053366,0.0020693657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051939704,0.0005044398,0.008369663,0.021554207,0.00048408014,0.0000089399755,0.011593643,0.00009957825,0.000106022846,0.108431265,0.8364671,0.012329142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026512053,0.00009211729,0.0011443396,0.00096986705,0.00020596854,0.000003009932,0.0006656903,0.00007877482,0.000005522702,0.0006262713,0.99552643,0.0004168601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.719053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47739336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34122574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015685825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002589991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252492574","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3945019","title":"Nova Scotia (Attorney General) v. Lawen Estate: Case Comment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Estate; Law; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01796054517169222,"score_gpt":0.30338343647345184,"score_spread":0.28542289130175963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252492574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7968575,0.01400924,0.002712816,0.042751417,0.003047705,0.00036815763,0.000012043659,0.00013740435,0.14010376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880102,0.0038139555,0.000079237325,0.0008175785,0.0017760339,0.0000016626832,0.0000031453217,0.000019394232,0.005478756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966602,0.00032057273,0.00031712418,0.00021424388,0.00043783567,0.0020500692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913716,0.000053889955,0.00016398204,0.0001353643,0.00029964605,0.00020997507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022766078,0.00013486999,0.0002128375,0.00004983511,0.0009032866,0.00028000705,0.00023016633,0.000099320394,0.0003163879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017217828,0.00012539333,0.00011343536,0.0003826183,0.000103271836,0.00033224994,0.000047013553,0.0010755848,0.00011495864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026934775,0.0002048773,0.0039880835,0.000022338594,0.0002672673,0.0020646637,0.007406769,0.00003845426,0.0003713704,0.9370741,0.008354364,0.040180784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095890247,0.00019207774,0.00008806782,0.00006046762,0.00008156452,0.0076401127,0.039474115,0.000017769531,0.0004446067,0.09179015,0.85877955,0.0004725986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07040062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39435703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8504252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011574444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006771874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253009070","doi":"10.15353/cgjsc-rcessc.v3i1.81","title":"A Class Action on Behalf of Federally-Sentenced Women with Mental Health Issues","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Graduate Journal of Sociology and Criminology","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Mental health; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Psychology; Criminology; Political science; Medicine; Psychiatry; Computer science; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.10617544029194828,"score_gpt":0.34159168368573145,"score_spread":0.23541624339378317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253009070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95567906,0.00036597438,0.00001379549,0.041811783,0.0003103581,0.00008700307,0.0000041346507,0.00000502639,0.0017228803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970394,0.0006287032,0.000029846193,0.0018910605,0.0002584793,0.0000024867009,0.0000011566113,0.0000056909184,0.00014322271],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986884,0.00038810118,0.000291219,0.00011205655,0.00013271719,0.00038752225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898666,0.000074697105,0.0003836957,0.00005050302,0.00017205569,0.00033241228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007835761,0.000088294924,0.00035827627,0.00016001734,0.00053503807,0.000014163163,0.00012330947,0.00015717573,0.000026686184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010644551,0.00006984281,0.000029719251,0.00004725679,0.0009268937,0.000104767765,0.0000064523915,0.00025839265,0.000002254801],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012890399,0.0002259841,0.042501334,0.000335536,0.00071941403,0.00008202287,0.40075633,0.000017175416,0.0009017226,0.47914594,0.02009028,0.053935207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049627256,0.022493701,0.15964814,0.00058430573,0.00013273825,0.00050671055,0.4147335,0.00001728701,0.00040221665,0.13083181,0.26480407,0.00088280585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.105892636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.160899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34831414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025722678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091198407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9000613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253588455","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20311","title":"Lalani v. Reeves <i>Case File No. 07-CV-338183CP; [2016] O.J. No. 397; 2016 ONSC 424 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, January 26, 2016)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Download; Law; Political science; Art; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.01707181484242867,"score_gpt":0.25230569093579847,"score_spread":0.2352338760933698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253588455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12838021,0.17232858,0.000110377274,0.007115419,0.00600565,0.0035215851,0.0022720008,0.00039709487,0.6798691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34343773,0.48955706,0.0016769639,0.0070994115,0.0048105167,0.00027322824,0.00007096657,0.0001977205,0.1528764],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980123,0.00012148458,0.0007877603,0.0004548469,0.00012012693,0.0005034725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834687,0.0003699701,0.00041517612,0.0003490405,0.00025534822,0.00026358693],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010824347,0.0002674068,0.0008325754,0.000037083413,0.0005555055,0.00011118855,0.0003015087,0.0001824665,0.0018330702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036209112,0.0001992366,0.00016319891,0.00007491515,0.00045232422,0.0007948457,0.00011939203,0.00014182662,0.0016728835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009322743,0.00020987913,0.0026398073,0.008256257,0.00029782514,0.00012308455,0.004660602,8.792843e-7,0.00042528927,0.040821426,0.91630244,0.026169296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030531158,0.000078106685,0.00012401585,0.002815434,0.00021788136,0.000038346683,0.00017723125,0.000002712155,0.000022381688,0.000292704,0.9955865,0.00033938332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10610657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07280598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5269927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017210786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066902576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99910444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253663200","doi":"10.5040/9781509922529","title":"Courts Without Cases","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.04520050111094261,"score_gpt":0.2962721350163189,"score_spread":0.2510716339053763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253663200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000113126924,0.0005046565,0.000010290754,0.00076025276,0.0029060724,0.00064161,0.00006445237,0.00037531645,0.9946242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047889676,0.00001689353,0.000027038424,0.00091563014,0.005481653,0.000029243152,0.00005983727,0.00008211289,0.94549793],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996909,0.0001615733,0.00043269474,0.00056955795,0.0012843991,0.00064273993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794537,0.00034833324,0.00047144067,0.00043392862,0.00050891005,0.00029201744],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015455355,0.0003359855,0.0006116453,0.00018998695,0.0007933596,0.0048461217,0.00089668646,0.0008729337,0.00043325676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001240614,0.0003232892,0.00019494406,0.00005075871,0.000330169,0.0015108808,0.0001686758,0.0008536265,0.0005328983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076158003,0.000008249855,0.00008308709,0.00013905417,0.000044639673,0.00005054298,0.0040350673,3.0479853e-7,0.0000028586837,0.16176984,0.83021355,0.0036452196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014849695,0.00002919055,0.000009679179,0.0005063503,0.000045962734,0.00000768577,0.0003163073,8.84317e-7,0.0000060118823,0.008505831,0.99000186,0.00042173007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0134514775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009119575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15978836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044563215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046220217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253904827","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.161114","title":"<i>Moreira v. Ontario Lottery &amp; Gaming Corp.</i> <i>Case No. CV-08-352327, CV-08-356748, [2012] O.J. No. 2359, 2012 ON.C. Lexis 4239; 2012 ONSC 2903 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, May 29, 2012)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Lexis; Download; Humanities; Political science; Art; Mathematics; Computer science; Philosophy; Statistics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.04049825371803708,"score_gpt":0.2792281938176612,"score_spread":0.2387299400996241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253904827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4645199,0.21962701,0.00020921748,0.00197605,0.0108025465,0.003547475,0.00040562096,0.00027533335,0.29863685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7595897,0.094798036,0.0031063294,0.015923359,0.009015357,0.00036184504,0.00025739518,0.00038720315,0.11656078],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951294,0.00029795757,0.0017078246,0.00086513686,0.00038312114,0.0016165456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964524,0.0004346069,0.0010351675,0.000813318,0.00040529412,0.00085919816],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031273623,0.0007709658,0.001903605,0.00012988964,0.0012838008,0.0003288722,0.00060650165,0.00046396864,0.002636506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018505432,0.00075045833,0.0004425577,0.00022429677,0.00071958906,0.0035807735,0.00025825118,0.0007798604,0.0025982226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00072902604,0.0030178882,0.071023725,0.029755164,0.0019935616,0.0002887615,0.04774647,0.00007773395,0.0006980454,0.16495407,0.6410342,0.038681388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006196176,0.000104412764,0.0006725898,0.0017482386,0.000779894,0.00018225079,0.00026778757,0.0000029460812,0.00002162997,0.00011397804,0.9945603,0.0009263646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31411666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6853956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37127894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009152376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009962444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254099115","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.17611","title":"Lake Louise Limited Partnership v. Canad Corp. of Manitoba, Ltd.Case No. CI 09-01-61504 and CI 09-01-61489, [2013] M.J. No. 81; 2013 MBQB 67; 2013 MB.C.Lexis 81 (Manitoba Court of Queen s Bench, Winnipeg Centre, March 15, 2013)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); General partnership; Charter; Library science; Political science; Geography; Humanities; Art; Archaeology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.02751448436436627,"score_gpt":0.2525301976058204,"score_spread":0.22501571324145414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254099115","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74947625,0.17393646,0.000014888658,0.014381919,0.002229204,0.0058945534,0.001262763,0.00016927403,0.05263469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.739571,0.25388914,0.0003606961,0.0017655425,0.001511948,0.00013271999,0.00016422172,0.00010746962,0.002497301],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962679,0.0003246109,0.0014309393,0.00074755185,0.00028984636,0.0009391424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967134,0.00034258753,0.0010351797,0.0005652672,0.0007017388,0.0006418411],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001376083,0.00052354013,0.0014410283,0.00012236458,0.0006420434,0.00028344546,0.00049802806,0.00032875972,0.00091030286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021471576,0.0005019998,0.00020779028,0.00026161794,0.0008827969,0.0008705262,0.00021658711,0.00034811214,0.0004418003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011930959,0.0005981784,0.057564866,0.01648078,0.0008779606,0.00015171507,0.0038271027,0.00004132804,0.000073588395,0.03238487,0.8611496,0.026730685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063472457,0.00012668807,0.0011530687,0.0014478482,0.00029909593,0.0000398329,0.0015429679,0.00013937349,0.00002007853,0.0007592972,0.9931088,0.00072820194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68301445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7243703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1319592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015007734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003674814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255176700","doi":"10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim080210021","title":"The Story of an Illusion: The Plan to Trade the 'Alabama' Claims for Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"The SHAFR Guide Online","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Illusion; Plan (archaeology); History; Archaeology; Psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.03726105557574012,"score_gpt":0.36292009114538787,"score_spread":0.32565903556964776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255176700","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046791093,0.0013901861,0.0000025675386,0.11379082,0.0021723476,0.0014932152,0.87969935,0.000016875907,0.0009667079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031557668,0.00325216,0.000098190394,0.018383496,0.037943445,0.00062681263,0.87116283,0.00018242079,0.03679295],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700534,0.00073667534,0.0004840473,0.00029338282,0.000976633,0.00050389225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99578863,0.0017367952,0.0006311657,0.0015127776,0.00018620983,0.00014444167],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046453825,0.00026185997,0.00038839623,0.000021330834,0.0073334477,0.0002330698,0.0047671758,0.00019030186,0.000046181416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018398677,0.000101069316,0.0001381218,0.00015873663,0.0008131566,0.00008921444,0.00026097315,0.00062313234,0.0000065773656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035151843,0.000022583316,0.0000010520347,0.00003360335,0.00005065176,0.000002112263,0.0016535525,0.00001053244,0.0000029960856,0.00054866436,0.99453735,0.003101726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011325861,0.00007529749,0.00014033787,0.00009252313,0.00009561275,0.0000022601348,0.0068237875,0.000012039648,0.0000027538645,0.00051102706,0.9919629,0.00016821346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8971187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09710197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018300246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032807512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256483765","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.171012","title":"Marina District Development Co. (c.o.b. Borgata Hotel Casino &amp; Spa) v. Canada <i>Case No. [2013] F.C.J. No. 847; 2103 Fed.C.C. LEXIS 858; 2013 F.C. 800; (Federal Court, Toronto, Ontario, July 18, 2013)</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Download; Advertising; Business; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.02357041584856334,"score_gpt":0.252725631977032,"score_spread":0.22915521612846868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256483765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24886087,0.13971369,0.00006891557,0.007459496,0.0061133383,0.005318692,0.00044137228,0.000272594,0.59175104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6458347,0.2201364,0.003585401,0.018279353,0.0034969458,0.0006200338,0.0005024385,0.00024471636,0.1073],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969525,0.0001380502,0.0010209238,0.00069857144,0.0002615488,0.00092840893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979358,0.0001355027,0.0005125994,0.00043507537,0.00035625327,0.0006247726],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083356147,0.0004834271,0.0010063732,0.000023358307,0.0016072177,0.0006553776,0.00044537726,0.0002090747,0.0022617113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000102827194,0.0004692712,0.00012385406,0.00008042711,0.00023792042,0.0011665389,0.00017569364,0.00029517553,0.0010104573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015628488,0.000077673154,0.004060913,0.0013290712,0.00015066628,0.00005899686,0.0012160008,0.0000030987808,0.0000024260228,0.0016329448,0.9832678,0.008184818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028683429,0.000032878972,0.0009620487,0.00035221654,0.000069016794,0.00007755465,0.00015897412,0.0000067285796,0.000003841621,0.00006462779,0.9973371,0.0006481961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.998436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99930304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48445103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018992664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024943037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256694958","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.181010","title":"Szecsodi v. MGM Resorts International <i>Court File No. CV-11-9457-00CL, [2014) O.J. No. 946, 2014 ONSC 1323, 2014 CarswellOnt 2465 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Commercial List, March 3, 2014)</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Download; Law; Political science; Library science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.01533223290551432,"score_gpt":0.26300772418413465,"score_spread":0.24767549127862032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256694958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10894745,0.06210503,0.0003101963,0.01779585,0.016143955,0.004245342,0.0023880294,0.00031537702,0.78774875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6303987,0.27661335,0.0033863767,0.018497115,0.015628284,0.00041232677,0.0012201759,0.00029624486,0.05354743],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970962,0.0002515599,0.0010914311,0.0006385024,0.00029873612,0.0006235779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977678,0.00038285693,0.00060334266,0.0004608837,0.00046211798,0.00032297123],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002354358,0.00036586725,0.0011063232,0.000073479176,0.00070921105,0.00026050874,0.00067920325,0.00025664916,0.0036637224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003579922,0.00036422347,0.00024831455,0.0000665238,0.0005324706,0.0007003817,0.00023695668,0.00033578216,0.0010075473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003846524,0.00011065491,0.007067214,0.0017739183,0.00009299565,0.0000040433115,0.001107515,0.0000114766135,0.000019402622,0.018465392,0.9688971,0.0024117916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038865145,0.00007922993,0.0013513849,0.00069022505,0.00021824989,0.000008399697,0.00009316819,0.00008286484,0.0000071744903,0.00025004792,0.996407,0.00042361813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23013522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28905722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7342014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029664102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042950414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281944215","doi":"10.21991/cf29440","title":"Special Issue on Dickson v. Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation, 2021 YKCA 5","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.023339500237354822,"score_gpt":0.2675515541482636,"score_spread":0.24421205391090878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281944215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016281394,0.0005755519,0.0035321554,0.04609833,0.018310012,0.001231747,0.000659781,0.0002634663,0.9277008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97571665,0.00008754879,0.000095584895,0.0023919896,0.015207207,0.0002946771,0.00018984212,0.000017374487,0.0059991274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955815,0.00025134912,0.00070549914,0.0007328151,0.0017463034,0.0009825309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982695,0.00030519444,0.00032416475,0.0003346268,0.00041436867,0.00035212422],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010130913,0.0003666824,0.0004236513,0.0003703296,0.012601699,0.00027650758,0.0007045846,0.00019568022,0.0126483925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000986917,0.0003962098,0.00026653192,0.001084143,0.0040956554,0.0008543227,0.00029285369,0.0006050905,0.0011497922],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008612046,0.00021230734,0.0031079066,0.000012309279,0.000044874243,0.000050332517,0.0007374063,0.0018943155,0.000009006239,0.7925816,0.19948174,0.0017820365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091767625,0.00012030688,0.000115600196,0.000077441924,0.000031133673,0.000042533826,0.0074768206,0.00007230115,0.00003225718,0.018140817,0.97246605,0.0005070784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00429723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006839999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9740885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011664578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037700236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289942971","doi":"10.1177/14647001221114611","title":"Drafting injustice: overturning <i>Roe v. Wade</i> , spillover effects and reproductive rights in context","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Theory","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Injustice; Context (archaeology); Reproductive rights; Spillover effect; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Philosophy; History; Demography; Reproductive health","score_opus":0.007330329053927768,"score_gpt":0.26507397967954793,"score_spread":0.25774365062562016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289942971","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54493266,0.0022293977,0.000020474938,0.00041684217,0.0011162175,0.0004961795,0.000010288331,0.00008691607,0.45069098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99582744,0.000010024819,0.000015769863,0.00064521685,0.00057242246,0.00005406429,0.0000019121246,0.00001183683,0.0028613426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979223,0.00073667354,0.00023393218,0.00041372838,0.00035699658,0.0003363857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870294,0.0008703452,0.00015086259,0.00015516288,0.00003583147,0.000084838],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002654981,0.00012394063,0.0002400811,0.000070096234,0.0014272694,0.00008397884,0.00019497826,0.000058256173,0.00013977103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011314927,0.00011932767,0.000037292506,0.0003587844,0.00030156033,0.00019097929,0.00017629127,0.00034401062,0.000012691929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015731013,0.0000755124,0.0048253015,0.000094569485,0.000022340806,0.0000758839,0.16554101,0.0000070411047,0.00034378897,0.8238092,0.0008925528,0.0041555027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007722467,0.00019559314,0.0016683144,0.0001519364,0.00003803763,0.000013380833,0.062461216,0.000009732221,0.0004994405,0.095789224,0.83798057,0.0004203052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066999667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094115204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.837088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016484632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012729206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297261397","doi":"10.1097/01.npr.0000873552.13618.91","title":"The overturn of Roe v. Wade","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Nurse Practitioner","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Management; Economic history; Political science; Law and economics; Law; History; Sociology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.015824041127521955,"score_gpt":0.30500866873611515,"score_spread":0.2891846276085932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297261397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03694758,0.0015811055,0.000058571673,0.118424654,0.0024070747,0.00050768506,0.000024029305,0.000073393974,0.8399759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98538375,0.000058734957,0.0000041360545,0.00044784954,0.00037395922,0.000048570568,0.0000013605409,0.0000052378778,0.013676378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880344,0.00038951886,0.00012500567,0.000071689166,0.00046671342,0.00014363856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923253,0.0003742976,0.00016085239,0.00014134707,0.00006504256,0.000025915117],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011553452,0.000039781244,0.00006166909,0.000012561838,0.0027428905,0.000053125004,0.00028482077,0.00001770924,0.0006455872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000308283,0.00002240943,0.00004286805,0.000231172,0.00019128273,0.00018156112,0.000026674557,0.00017569237,0.000032188615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084538246,0.00013072783,0.0005024223,0.0000065907643,0.000049198534,0.0000018512594,0.038115405,0.0001271134,0.00052556087,0.8464224,0.108637266,0.0053969305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006207741,0.000019629882,0.0004992617,0.0000029788703,0.000011816441,0.000002006753,0.024821028,0.000007410619,0.00007711985,0.012539616,0.9619178,0.000039243525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010414537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011599864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9484362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000061447936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018179468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298088210","doi":"","title":"Did hosp. violate FMLA: is RN guilty of job abandonment? Case on point: Stekloff v. St. John's Mercy Health Systems, 2000 WL 959613 F.3d-MO (2000).","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abandonment (legal); Point (geometry); Law; Political science; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.02319196584991082,"score_gpt":0.2708065344722051,"score_spread":0.24761456862229428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298088210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7589349,0.016930576,0.00003398111,0.008815318,0.0026424846,0.00752409,0.0010706346,0.00047491127,0.20357308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863237,0.0015044583,0.000012884438,0.0008706366,0.000933383,0.0005766757,0.000010998459,0.000046202465,0.0097210575],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952844,0.0005959568,0.0010213683,0.00065813353,0.0011127307,0.0013274438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979561,0.000165671,0.00052358164,0.00048184078,0.00018587905,0.0006869502],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025813296,0.00035808576,0.0008398122,0.00015663354,0.0010192195,0.00022815635,0.0005017081,0.00024937934,0.0005444021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015843981,0.00031778368,0.0001758438,0.0007607308,0.00026125307,0.00052389764,0.000057348952,0.00031074265,0.00013922484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007836338,0.0013833713,0.010717919,0.0015030995,0.0006474213,0.00086252496,0.08176893,0.00035922416,0.000010820971,0.007322718,0.15551822,0.7391221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001849557,0.0002724397,0.016659033,0.00026688378,0.00009056326,0.00008344315,0.0030080064,0.00006376768,0.00005749924,0.00045318736,0.9763749,0.0008206838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26250127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009872926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8208567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000806484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005117809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298394964","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197519998.013.10","title":"When Queer Theory Goes to Law School","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Queer theory; Sodomy; Human sexuality; Interrogation; Sociology; Gender studies; Feminism; Supreme court; Homosexuality; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.023680275708311257,"score_gpt":0.23315658350301555,"score_spread":0.20947630779470428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298394964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000014350727,0.00015711272,0.00008146133,0.00024823003,0.0004668403,0.0006191297,0.000119309465,0.0001953166,0.99809825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0038974762,0.00012816623,0.000059385853,0.00056288013,0.0005021473,0.000003124067,0.000008786021,0.00004018248,0.9947978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981943,0.0001621275,0.00017337428,0.0004598896,0.000637918,0.00037240481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998845,0.00011758705,0.00017519656,0.00033604802,0.00015357243,0.00037260464],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000481524,0.00026127152,0.00036308635,0.00012410682,0.001413488,0.00015271963,0.000899976,0.00031758664,0.002195268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039796556,0.00029918228,0.00018731273,0.000015213133,0.00034459177,0.0002592884,0.0005370471,0.0004903067,0.000015684029],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081066275,0.0000055746805,0.0000026349712,0.00003158526,0.000081666156,0.000059925667,0.0046260124,0.000002242004,0.0000017892974,0.9818064,0.011969481,0.0013316403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014612521,0.000048247788,9.715582e-7,0.000077616416,0.00008618683,6.134118e-7,0.0010733267,1.4116588e-7,0.000006073187,0.03654933,0.96164465,0.0003667031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024881907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007371205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9496752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004622674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040773812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4303107322","doi":"10.46692/9781447313656.007","title":"Access to records and family reunification","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family reunification; Computer science; Genealogy; Geography; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.07185045756388912,"score_gpt":0.371956698856067,"score_spread":0.3001062412921779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4303107322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000035986846,0.0006234951,0.000067147244,0.0013633823,0.0005389315,0.00033519574,0.000010115675,0.00017242029,0.99685335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004026539,0.00034769214,0.000118612734,0.0004973907,0.0013140381,0.000016666205,0.0000055324454,0.0000681536,0.9936054],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926984,0.00005207318,0.00009672687,0.00019587524,0.00025091312,0.0001345836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995532,0.000013610134,0.00007272661,0.00011270095,0.00008519372,0.00016254868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035980894,0.000081206694,0.00014771138,0.00009830374,0.00009038835,0.00020819483,0.00023622163,0.00018538322,0.00072090974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014740715,0.000069698144,0.000009782666,0.00025902985,0.0000558088,0.00010910457,0.000049806065,0.000051639887,0.00020660652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012660878,0.000003939618,0.00011618504,0.000014634375,0.000004185869,3.3107125e-7,0.0006837284,1.2823124e-8,0.000001367494,0.0042432677,0.9879392,0.0069918786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003087236,0.000011454057,0.0001320764,0.000057176476,0.0000049745267,5.623668e-8,0.00069546164,1.8822188e-7,5.527832e-7,0.0007318791,0.9982241,0.00011124625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19207947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11714031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074939154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003764992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023832096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8989696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306366317","doi":"","title":"Implications and reflections on the 2010 Supreme Court ruling on Canada&amp;amp;#39;s AHR Act","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.10491841339325327,"score_gpt":0.3292463078774602,"score_spread":0.22432789448420692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306366317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07414778,0.004064532,0.07013599,0.059375007,0.0053807828,0.0022418443,0.00026225898,0.0003661302,0.78402567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99681294,0.00003673858,0.000040371626,0.0022108185,0.00072041183,0.0000689586,0.000006850272,0.000013880708,0.00008902346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981945,0.00016018692,0.00026846107,0.00033271033,0.0006684445,0.00037565484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985711,0.0005676554,0.000092511735,0.00025620352,0.00009513587,0.00041741307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008397169,0.00015704597,0.00021917679,0.000034632023,0.0012799407,0.00009773097,0.00030743863,0.00017966317,0.00061183615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001093704,0.00010535989,0.000043387783,0.0001822108,0.0004566639,0.00012968032,0.000057494643,0.00043678313,0.00001853855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028955238,0.00067700143,0.012453235,0.0001621301,0.00026919172,0.00001884814,0.05407262,0.0000038338476,0.00057536917,0.60076255,0.01821823,0.31249744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009813764,0.0002163173,0.033304248,0.00004143503,0.0001277355,0.00001514245,0.0035479837,0.0006873197,0.00011054527,0.026962208,0.933188,0.000817691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68719983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78908634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9226652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059043687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031144868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98443985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308792409","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada Ruling in Carter v. Canada: A New Era of End-of-Life Care for Canadians","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.18168632627563136,"score_gpt":0.48128892694769154,"score_spread":0.2996026006720602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308792409","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9315916,0.045551386,0.000037511232,0.0032216397,0.0017858706,0.0011738674,0.00039973544,0.0000062494737,0.0162322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99868304,0.0006048192,0.000027173279,0.00016098202,0.00025496518,0.000015481288,0.000003566127,0.000019019293,0.00023094781],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970251,0.00021321441,0.000976525,0.00020051468,0.0011185685,0.00046607896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99661255,0.0005393316,0.0009510194,0.00022687881,0.0011225074,0.00054771977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015437399,0.00016482921,0.0007499189,0.00013455836,0.00032933796,0.00017643538,0.0017907366,0.00008294876,0.00024462526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014604726,0.00013550269,0.00008647833,0.00068416423,0.0001816191,0.00057043304,0.00012672743,0.00021699737,7.8788474e-8],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028723117,0.000059406793,0.63019055,0.00048681896,0.00027095943,0.000023446071,0.025746418,0.0012376297,0.0012062305,0.0013038074,0.32824233,0.0109451525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023067063,0.000051479135,0.21501966,0.0020475406,0.00016244664,0.0000027502247,0.07658085,0.00008166826,0.0069590923,0.0045141913,0.6913352,0.00093838293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99994045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4151709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076752313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046849746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95855373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311883767","doi":"","title":"No Jordan’s Principle Cases in Canada? A Review of the Administrative Response to Jordan’s Principle","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.41825039322154733,"score_gpt":0.6133055297225486,"score_spread":0.19505513650100126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311883767","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024501788,0.9795091,8.469831e-7,0.0004233429,0.001215115,0.004045911,0.0003758785,0.000013034139,0.011966564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00558821,0.991341,0.000026284344,0.00044599696,0.0003866458,0.00034036775,0.000008592149,0.00007136285,0.0017915216],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885491,0.0045164046,0.0029276896,0.0007324364,0.0025098727,0.00076448236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99112666,0.001745155,0.0038622937,0.00093881215,0.001611531,0.00071552215],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010608188,0.0006699458,0.0041513024,0.0005410015,0.0004930289,0.0006181143,0.0065512126,0.00025208166,0.0027005353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014549523,0.00047114078,0.0005648956,0.003738137,0.00029422855,0.0011433824,0.001641916,0.0008994129,0.00002363091],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014622359,0.001100229,0.018160004,0.18991512,0.001363045,0.0011798042,0.0041345633,0.000020461868,0.000052623236,0.00230583,0.39442578,0.38588032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012778882,0.000020415342,0.0014931393,0.11179977,0.00022571036,0.00001915725,0.00025433218,1.5256221e-7,0.000015449612,0.00017050642,0.88538164,0.0004919479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88709044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8937219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49095586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026928382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04424507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312063360","doi":"10.25172/dc.10","title":"Greening Criminal Legal Deserts in Rural Texas","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Criminal justice; Constitution; Political science; Criminology; Rural area; Law; Public defender; Economic Justice; Geography; Sociology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06627981101426933,"score_gpt":0.36527104029009966,"score_spread":0.29899122927583033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312063360","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007743173,0.0016009648,0.000011193516,0.00038972643,0.0025224246,0.0003379835,0.0000075532253,0.0001124413,0.9872745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76020175,0.00068421,0.00008011008,0.00016636615,0.0040534586,0.000055196495,0.000030289479,0.000042783457,0.23468585],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962592,0.00024018456,0.0005237448,0.0003366813,0.0019878508,0.00065230415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991084,0.000114478404,0.00023832312,0.00016209515,0.00023818598,0.00013851855],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027162207,0.00021730595,0.0005008955,0.00017348671,0.00066671666,0.00023058403,0.0004758956,0.00029293585,0.0064739767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000675408,0.00020589057,0.00014823192,0.0005584147,0.00013674937,0.00035070544,0.00019039983,0.0006644125,0.000049574584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110136665,0.00030313822,0.19930169,0.0014595987,0.00019876119,0.0020861023,0.024165299,0.00010597584,0.000010265549,0.11371387,0.5906105,0.067934625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089191395,0.00003840477,0.0027453091,0.0001477592,0.000029534738,0.000016998129,0.0074183606,0.0000017223306,0.0000017086679,0.0005875167,0.98861027,0.0003132252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7858362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39414605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7525887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009636817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054089325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99443424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312665077","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4284018","title":"Post-Horrocks Judicial Review Appeals: Deference on Questions of Evidence?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University; University of British Columbia; Golder Associates (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Judicial deference; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05672507566631046,"score_gpt":0.3554129226578588,"score_spread":0.2986878469915483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312665077","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12178458,0.7176892,0.0018209072,0.07920537,0.0032334272,0.0022555762,0.00006164971,0.00025021986,0.07369906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9143791,0.08307614,0.000005723148,0.0007094114,0.0005084444,0.000024714349,0.0000012625978,0.000010799804,0.0012843919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963655,0.00074591616,0.00044469562,0.00018838292,0.00097381626,0.0012816871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884737,0.00018784375,0.0004041307,0.0001338821,0.0003191832,0.00010762302],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059786523,0.00011402355,0.00029278273,0.000106345884,0.0016482787,0.00003798408,0.0005781293,0.000045417262,0.00034404558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013900615,0.00009426367,0.00015150734,0.0005837983,0.000112772155,0.00025429766,0.000067056346,0.0015749362,0.000025034436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012491808,0.00021897387,0.0011497183,0.00016582053,0.00010146989,0.000007889259,0.0031984374,0.000052088926,0.00028049355,0.938011,0.002548045,0.054141164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006362834,0.0046470617,0.0005983955,0.0050891624,0.00031587694,0.00028728013,0.034200948,0.000005970688,0.000068606576,0.61876184,0.33457887,0.00080968864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010259333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011575313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79259455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010759326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007685511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312694957","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4226330","title":"Privacy Dark Patterns: A Case for Regulatory Reform in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Personally identifiable information; Internet privacy; Privacy policy; Information privacy; Business; Information privacy law; Privacy by Design; Legislature; Privacy law; Population; CLARITY; Privacy laws of the United States; The Internet; Political science; Law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.011130648874258535,"score_gpt":0.25894013435475555,"score_spread":0.247809485480497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312694957","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99162686,0.0019913067,0.00013139046,0.0026414604,0.00053347164,0.000303908,0.00001828743,0.0000110931605,0.0027422016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982252,0.0002391638,0.0000050369986,0.00019126016,0.00043166915,0.000046733865,0.000002000792,0.000013219828,0.00084569835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973124,0.0001545289,0.00028155532,0.00014715818,0.0004530238,0.001651299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995441,0.000045467128,0.0001665424,0.00009197401,0.000060569506,0.0000913576],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029072163,0.00008185321,0.00015148902,0.000068090616,0.0013257127,0.00004511226,0.0003124858,0.000026424703,0.00005143566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008514217,0.00007909924,0.000053822892,0.0002402665,0.000021888634,0.00019510962,0.000050185183,0.00093803613,5.146642e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037924308,0.00024149884,0.08775934,0.00011927362,0.00028028354,0.0018132762,0.025582848,0.00028653126,0.000062656654,0.76933765,0.0043002274,0.10983719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018159465,0.00045739193,0.0016165789,0.000046742847,0.000032786273,0.0034660897,0.49083674,0.000051385894,0.000013023416,0.25532123,0.24578606,0.0005560028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9928881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5140164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021667752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03480997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312703641","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_3868-2","title":"Same-Sex Marriage in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Demography; Psychology; Genealogy; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.0199130651764603,"score_gpt":0.24154604696517643,"score_spread":0.22163298178871613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312703641","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000044966237,0.00053574523,6.575225e-7,0.0010862579,0.0007894896,0.0002231305,0.000029042021,0.00002695426,0.9972637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06664641,0.0002547209,0.0000047266735,0.00071952055,0.0004755856,0.000011186605,0.000008649783,0.000020839874,0.93185836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985526,0.00003635615,0.0002515578,0.00023914925,0.0006641313,0.00025616094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995488,0.000088865454,0.00010607044,0.0001247694,0.000030262288,0.00010121264],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033232674,0.00013572977,0.00028766197,0.00006048307,0.00026588878,0.000038681617,0.00029680328,0.00011371363,0.039461326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004390902,0.0001362195,0.000046106263,0.000053363572,0.000053198197,0.000078759906,0.00007753513,0.00031326848,0.000043352087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024499782,0.0000026978903,0.00022000141,0.000022134553,0.000011670362,0.00014187103,0.0011456753,0.0000022368436,2.1935392e-7,0.95218855,0.04260897,0.0036535074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004793713,0.000006187993,0.000017912625,0.000023014514,0.0000041951334,4.136017e-7,0.0013683281,4.709185e-7,4.3901508e-7,0.015538286,0.9828075,0.00018527285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99972385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99993384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9401986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016074821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006335402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323351855","doi":"10.32920/22229284","title":"It Shouldn’t be Small Potatoes: The Future of Civil Damage Awards under Canada’s Personal Information Protection Legislation. Part Two: Inadequate PIPEDA Damages and the Way Forward","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Legislation; Personally identifiable information; Political science; Legislature; Law; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.04086420066099214,"score_gpt":0.2815357231726905,"score_spread":0.24067152251169835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323351855","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04742612,0.00148709,0.011091296,0.68804115,0.0074744946,0.007906396,0.00046535349,0.0004013169,0.23570678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911031,0.0005343096,0.000018462588,0.0014162539,0.0013377547,0.00021766947,0.00005708178,0.000018747458,0.005296604],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727494,0.00048338508,0.00058820465,0.00027366704,0.0010333649,0.00034643698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829453,0.0002763997,0.0005879023,0.00027320508,0.0004729429,0.00009504309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025644528,0.00026150292,0.0003805037,0.000083992156,0.0012440216,0.00046895572,0.0004774172,0.00028091026,0.00009476572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031503334,0.00015088654,0.0001178475,0.00032727525,0.00053340074,0.0005046417,0.00031011674,0.0006851779,0.0000036653748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003996966,0.00006994079,0.0016195563,0.0021754375,0.00089805335,0.00000620365,0.44183877,0.0072189933,0.000011746807,0.3085349,0.19814065,0.03908605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093646406,0.00003818115,0.0028840234,0.00025907703,0.00015494139,0.0000018545484,0.17458777,0.0033847073,0.000024735991,0.015066039,0.802175,0.000487245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95884955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.943677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002567459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031684379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9568134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323352387","doi":"10.32920/22227886.v1","title":"It Shouldn't Be Small Potatoes: The Future of Civil Damage Awards Under Canada's Personal Information Protection Legislation. Part One: The Nature and Enforcement of the Privacy Interest under PIPEDA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Personally identifiable information; Legislation; Political science; Law; Legislature; Economic Justice; Privacy laws of the United States; Enforcement; Business; Law and economics; Information privacy; Sociology","score_opus":0.0583807773821568,"score_gpt":0.2904150173103474,"score_spread":0.2320342399281906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323352387","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16581482,0.0016737451,0.004013227,0.6437214,0.010834718,0.010887805,0.00060837495,0.00021087723,0.16223504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953318,0.00020352507,0.000007372846,0.0016469868,0.00068335637,0.00009479895,0.000030684405,0.000012358024,0.001989071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977356,0.00028834064,0.0005379995,0.00021227056,0.0009893958,0.00023639722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983022,0.00015832213,0.0006771302,0.0003489058,0.00046026777,0.000053134267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012206767,0.00020888618,0.0002566638,0.000052437535,0.000786007,0.00022278407,0.00067424227,0.0004026942,0.00016542734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021460059,0.00010610512,0.00011283374,0.0003540254,0.0003541124,0.0002503355,0.0005242975,0.0009889746,6.8107965e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014749853,0.00013043282,0.0027883353,0.002443483,0.0010608216,8.637054e-7,0.25849718,0.005931982,0.000048212376,0.62931746,0.09219389,0.0074398527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003811295,0.000058920636,0.014848044,0.0007833785,0.00018114981,0.0000015292004,0.21072157,0.0009055462,0.00018860836,0.01674675,0.7547422,0.00044117827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80159295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.983307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.829517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027062072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002684071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60454094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323352421","doi":"10.32920/22229284.v1","title":"It Shouldn’t be Small Potatoes: The Future of Civil Damage Awards under Canada’s Personal Information Protection Legislation. Part Two: Inadequate PIPEDA Damages and the Way Forward","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Legislation; Personally identifiable information; Legislature; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.04086420066099214,"score_gpt":0.2815357231726905,"score_spread":0.24067152251169835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323352421","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04742612,0.00148709,0.011091296,0.68804115,0.0074744946,0.007906396,0.00046535349,0.0004013169,0.23570678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911031,0.0005343096,0.000018462588,0.0014162539,0.0013377547,0.00021766947,0.00005708178,0.000018747458,0.005296604],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727494,0.00048338508,0.00058820465,0.00027366704,0.0010333649,0.00034643698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829453,0.0002763997,0.0005879023,0.00027320508,0.0004729429,0.00009504309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025644528,0.00026150292,0.0003805037,0.000083992156,0.0012440216,0.00046895572,0.0004774172,0.00028091026,0.00009476572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031503334,0.00015088654,0.0001178475,0.00032727525,0.00053340074,0.0005046417,0.00031011674,0.0006851779,0.0000036653748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003996966,0.00006994079,0.0016195563,0.0021754375,0.00089805335,0.00000620365,0.44183877,0.0072189933,0.000011746807,0.3085349,0.19814065,0.03908605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093646406,0.00003818115,0.0028840234,0.00025907703,0.00015494139,0.0000018545484,0.17458777,0.0033847073,0.000024735991,0.015066039,0.802175,0.000487245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95884955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.943677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002567459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031684379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9568134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323352446","doi":"10.32920/22227886","title":"It Shouldn't Be Small Potatoes: The Future of Civil Damage Awards Under Canada's Personal Information Protection Legislation. Part One: The Nature and Enforcement of the Privacy Interest under PIPEDA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Personally identifiable information; Legislation; Political science; Law; Legislature; Enforcement; Economic Justice; Privacy policy; Privacy laws of the United States; FTC Fair Information Practice; Business; Law and economics; Information privacy; Information privacy law; Sociology; Privacy by Design","score_opus":0.0583807773821568,"score_gpt":0.2904150173103474,"score_spread":0.2320342399281906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323352446","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16581482,0.0016737451,0.004013227,0.6437214,0.010834718,0.010887805,0.00060837495,0.00021087723,0.16223504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953318,0.00020352507,0.000007372846,0.0016469868,0.00068335637,0.00009479895,0.000030684405,0.000012358024,0.001989071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977356,0.00028834064,0.0005379995,0.00021227056,0.0009893958,0.00023639722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983022,0.00015832213,0.0006771302,0.0003489058,0.00046026777,0.000053134267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012206767,0.00020888618,0.0002566638,0.000052437535,0.000786007,0.00022278407,0.00067424227,0.0004026942,0.00016542734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021460059,0.00010610512,0.00011283374,0.0003540254,0.0003541124,0.0002503355,0.0005242975,0.0009889746,6.8107965e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014749853,0.00013043282,0.0027883353,0.002443483,0.0010608216,8.637054e-7,0.25849718,0.005931982,0.000048212376,0.62931746,0.09219389,0.0074398527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003811295,0.000058920636,0.014848044,0.0007833785,0.00018114981,0.0000015292004,0.21072157,0.0009055462,0.00018860836,0.01674675,0.7547422,0.00044117827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80159295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.983307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.829517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027062072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002684071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60454094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323538348","doi":"10.32920/22229284.v2","title":"It Shouldn’t be Small Potatoes: The Future of Civil Damage Awards under Canada’s Personal Information Protection Legislation. Part Two: Inadequate PIPEDA Damages and the Way Forward","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Legislation; Personally identifiable information; Political science; Legislature; Law; Economic Justice; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04086420066099214,"score_gpt":0.2815357231726905,"score_spread":0.24067152251169835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323538348","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04742612,0.00148709,0.011091296,0.68804115,0.0074744946,0.007906396,0.00046535349,0.0004013169,0.23570678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911031,0.0005343096,0.000018462588,0.0014162539,0.0013377547,0.00021766947,0.00005708178,0.000018747458,0.005296604],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727494,0.00048338508,0.00058820465,0.00027366704,0.0010333649,0.00034643698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829453,0.0002763997,0.0005879023,0.00027320508,0.0004729429,0.00009504309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025644528,0.00026150292,0.0003805037,0.000083992156,0.0012440216,0.00046895572,0.0004774172,0.00028091026,0.00009476572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031503334,0.00015088654,0.0001178475,0.00032727525,0.00053340074,0.0005046417,0.00031011674,0.0006851779,0.0000036653748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003996966,0.00006994079,0.0016195563,0.0021754375,0.00089805335,0.00000620365,0.44183877,0.0072189933,0.000011746807,0.3085349,0.19814065,0.03908605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093646406,0.00003818115,0.0028840234,0.00025907703,0.00015494139,0.0000018545484,0.17458777,0.0033847073,0.000024735991,0.015066039,0.802175,0.000487245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95884955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.943677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002567459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031684379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9568134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323538413","doi":"10.32920/22227886.v2","title":"It Shouldn't Be Small Potatoes: The Future of Civil Damage Awards Under Canada's Personal Information Protection Legislation. Part One: The Nature and Enforcement of the Privacy Interest under PIPEDA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Personally identifiable information; Legislation; Political science; Legislature; Law; Enforcement; Economic Justice; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0583807773821568,"score_gpt":0.2904150173103474,"score_spread":0.2320342399281906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323538413","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16581482,0.0016737451,0.004013227,0.6437214,0.010834718,0.010887805,0.00060837495,0.00021087723,0.16223504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953318,0.00020352507,0.000007372846,0.0016469868,0.00068335637,0.00009479895,0.000030684405,0.000012358024,0.001989071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977356,0.00028834064,0.0005379995,0.00021227056,0.0009893958,0.00023639722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983022,0.00015832213,0.0006771302,0.0003489058,0.00046026777,0.000053134267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012206767,0.00020888618,0.0002566638,0.000052437535,0.000786007,0.00022278407,0.00067424227,0.0004026942,0.00016542734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021460059,0.00010610512,0.00011283374,0.0003540254,0.0003541124,0.0002503355,0.0005242975,0.0009889746,6.8107965e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014749853,0.00013043282,0.0027883353,0.002443483,0.0010608216,8.637054e-7,0.25849718,0.005931982,0.000048212376,0.62931746,0.09219389,0.0074398527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003811295,0.000058920636,0.014848044,0.0007833785,0.00018114981,0.0000015292004,0.21072157,0.0009055462,0.00018860836,0.01674675,0.7547422,0.00044117827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80159295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.983307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.829517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027062072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002684071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60454094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361029193","doi":"10.1353/sch.2009.0023","title":"Public Diplomacy in the U.S. Supreme Court: The Warren Years—Part II","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Memoir; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Biography; Politics; Diplomacy; Law; Warren Court; State (computer science); Sociology; Art history; History; Political science","score_opus":0.060357327866453515,"score_gpt":0.2870304650667115,"score_spread":0.22667313720025797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361029193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4635788,0.034495752,0.000048790505,0.13680027,0.0052522933,0.00085337815,0.000008059183,0.00008625167,0.3588764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926364,0.0005732902,0.000016814507,0.0019059109,0.0025882125,0.0000038160165,7.0875126e-7,0.000011644783,0.0022632205],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969451,0.00050636433,0.00064480485,0.00015331445,0.0013129866,0.00043741803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846256,0.00020194105,0.00051895616,0.00025553707,0.00040703543,0.00015396647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004397554,0.0001483393,0.00032148763,0.00017107523,0.0006362354,0.00012367072,0.0012438999,0.00012239051,0.00036784518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065136154,0.00009317363,0.00019611995,0.00036408973,0.00036518695,0.00083233305,0.000038176564,0.0006566887,0.000031273186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005483101,0.00037271375,0.0028405131,0.00001316317,0.000044365257,0.00011066857,0.0731641,0.000010750002,0.00016512025,0.025370326,0.8908321,0.0070213033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033448968,0.00018768932,0.0099007,0.000064916814,0.000029141353,0.000024533434,0.0034477594,0.0000037798452,0.0000037317325,0.0047266674,0.9811461,0.00013046425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010504386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015864864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5290576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007944111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011864258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48934725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361288409","doi":"10.3138/chr.104.1.rev15","title":"<i>The Tenth Justice: Judicial Appointments, Marc Nadon, and the Supreme Court Act</i>. Carissima Mathen and Michael Plaxton.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Historical Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.025776165786006902,"score_gpt":0.28092126463009837,"score_spread":0.2551450988440915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361288409","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006021763,0.698574,0.0000099992485,0.25439742,0.0021905096,0.0018355289,0.000041054045,0.00010118847,0.042248096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20301159,0.766212,0.000021231313,0.009714154,0.0020111438,0.00025271357,0.000012917485,0.000053049316,0.01871123],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814546,0.00028356398,0.00034141497,0.00027073643,0.00040810838,0.0005507022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984666,0.00047361647,0.0001229949,0.0001980281,0.00011249394,0.00062623725],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00202807,0.00015151441,0.00038837167,0.000049816248,0.002231187,0.00013676511,0.00033886937,0.00009578668,0.000038137972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016839695,0.00009325896,0.000073362506,0.00054968224,0.00036624758,0.00010097807,0.000053866504,0.00021577104,0.000053927397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013418024,0.000005720959,0.00030923449,0.00073009083,0.00003395,0.00003068913,0.0024185,8.3235825e-8,0.0000010419708,0.047519326,0.9062584,0.042679522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001819814,0.000014860922,0.00018444059,0.0003227403,0.00014830376,0.000003875936,0.00030489228,0.000007713748,9.7410364e-8,0.0016376869,0.9970658,0.0001276131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5869152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53200364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24468328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014613527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008815258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382585266","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v14i2.14880","title":"Deductibility of Surrogacy Payments in Canadian Tax Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Tax credit; Tax deduction; Indirect tax; Value-added tax; Business; Tax reform; Direct tax; Public economics; Income tax; Deductible; Ad valorem tax; State income tax; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; Actuarial science; Gross income","score_opus":0.06932076726047351,"score_gpt":0.3876628382342725,"score_spread":0.31834207097379896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382585266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857289,0.0019606203,4.867855e-7,0.004029203,0.0009093633,0.00010514162,0.000008117866,0.00000871416,0.0072494224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99851793,0.00042795046,0.0000064253745,0.00008173741,0.00035682306,0.0000017995704,2.4169287e-7,0.0000059209287,0.0006011781],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836797,0.00017819156,0.0005350757,0.00010378446,0.00044505775,0.00036994423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989371,0.00013488265,0.00029392415,0.00007182965,0.00038204162,0.00018024455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021169165,0.00008609147,0.00038451227,0.0001713776,0.00024807328,0.000047344845,0.00023391905,0.000048036574,0.00001163551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057434954,0.000070273665,0.00007921682,0.0005538386,0.00032039458,0.0004937697,0.000039912087,0.00014943368,0.0000123406235],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002732314,0.000055681838,0.95235705,0.000104614155,0.00013941844,0.00016456515,0.035288166,0.000028483606,0.000051263924,0.00891288,0.0018327592,0.0010377648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013496386,0.0004216897,0.26352707,0.0009670075,0.0000757378,0.000021790858,0.09128781,0.0000018136153,0.00048956147,0.008957239,0.6324693,0.0004313188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80342495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9752349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026940077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006246461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2865677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385357111","doi":"10.59962/9780774867771-010","title":"McCue v. University of British Columbia","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Geography","score_opus":0.021618301451640787,"score_gpt":0.19779820870584183,"score_spread":0.17617990725420105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385357111","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0052590813,0.00038671223,0.000019847295,0.000013916006,0.00045207195,0.0007231324,0.0032972367,0.00024054252,0.98960745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041330993,0.0013613645,0.000065014276,0.000012606699,0.0001705921,1.7059087e-7,0.00003473056,0.00004988056,0.9569746],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757046,0.0001218109,0.0003343167,0.0006431269,0.00088112673,0.00044919056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977662,0.00013769597,0.0006803279,0.00033681616,0.00080464437,0.00027431428],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044193142,0.00014022528,0.0008600902,0.000050670533,0.00088807615,0.00034611658,0.0010519578,0.00078640366,0.001264047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004963082,0.0005147985,0.0004009028,0.00005428416,0.0018645761,0.00022673066,0.00045116915,0.00041588204,0.000025893194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041104988,0.0000920583,0.00067820546,0.0009744217,0.00057535234,0.002362972,0.0042649712,0.0000030541091,0.000008388357,0.0054966677,0.92141783,0.06408495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072530215,0.00008423398,0.001433998,0.0019755256,0.00025072886,0.000013112513,0.0025878937,0.0000023369253,2.6069907e-7,0.004416588,0.987975,0.0005350247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06655714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018783993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074971095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385509996","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1425","title":"Reference Re Genetic Non-Discrimination Act: How to Make Space for Some Certainty","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisprudence; Certainty; Political science; Power (physics); Criminal law; Statement (logic); Expansive; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.059303696513317475,"score_gpt":0.3350643466073373,"score_spread":0.27576065009401984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385509996","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00905389,0.20833738,0.001972072,0.5451952,0.003910382,0.018176278,0.00048667958,0.00051301793,0.21235509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97707826,0.009022972,0.00041952726,0.0069554066,0.0006156909,0.00095012004,0.00003483831,0.000029075742,0.00489409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981003,0.00023809091,0.0002663384,0.00036500263,0.0006340635,0.0003962009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990484,0.00010171434,0.00016644117,0.00027138443,0.00024510306,0.00016692567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013369287,0.00014666707,0.00036988262,0.00003316502,0.0011522681,0.00011713941,0.00048213295,0.000043683118,0.00035828014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040892116,0.00013880346,0.000114017625,0.00036782387,0.00007035091,0.00020880552,0.00012976331,0.00014459256,0.00003622093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003778083,0.00013505695,0.00013143205,0.0072209644,0.000046848618,0.000013649844,0.005412621,0.000028721897,0.00030118434,0.73145616,0.21330473,0.041910872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010717907,0.00010422097,0.00008433528,0.00064006326,0.000055936256,0.0000011554721,0.0006481699,0.000008012793,0.000026033513,0.0032883186,0.9948337,0.00020287796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008185478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01133136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9680244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022997725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028348024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512099","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1386","title":"The Law Society of British Columbia v. Trinity Western University: Complicated Answers to a Simple Question","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Law; Columbia university; Political science; Sociology; Media studies","score_opus":0.0417729288231093,"score_gpt":0.2996309573106084,"score_spread":0.2578580284874991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512099","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.084005535,0.19188792,0.0017771864,0.38702622,0.0014686289,0.017206114,0.0016500283,0.0017330986,0.31324527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9596898,0.028496057,0.000052092422,0.01067807,0.00022682246,0.00000879458,0.000014287899,0.0000136133485,0.000820454],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998638,0.00031163433,0.00026499716,0.00021436304,0.00034439753,0.00022663298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991018,0.00010123196,0.00014096359,0.00014401643,0.00031429087,0.00019770079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082923874,0.00006790612,0.00032897224,0.0000017265945,0.0007503716,0.00015029848,0.00039140883,0.000059335332,0.00006339588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000096604046,0.000083787214,0.00014861682,0.0004711478,0.00034289903,0.00018332247,0.00007817497,0.000110638706,0.000028288825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042692427,0.00016645298,0.008679032,0.006565551,0.00023240942,0.000017406383,0.005302765,0.0000048972975,0.00015611471,0.13655539,0.8166904,0.02558691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011068149,0.000043909185,0.000395033,0.0008289812,0.00004444797,6.3205016e-7,0.00050282787,0.000002536586,0.0000027695403,0.00028067135,0.9976847,0.00010280999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47533593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60668087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87568426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006638304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014092738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57713276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512108","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1383","title":"A Comment on R. v. Reeves: Investigative Issues with Shared Electronic Devices and Data","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Adaptation (eye); Internet privacy; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.10151853592939351,"score_gpt":0.3568311269141614,"score_spread":0.2553125909847679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512108","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006293272,0.29044008,0.000020868401,0.6791695,0.000046582445,0.001512407,0.00007512979,0.00014197394,0.02796414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7387228,0.09994739,0.00025516172,0.16021709,0.0005512424,0.00006590688,0.00008850039,0.000030152652,0.00012172009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983351,0.00028067856,0.00023675573,0.00041533948,0.00042895443,0.0003031361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991559,0.00008295599,0.0001389632,0.00029510964,0.00010908131,0.00021800674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075220753,0.0001516074,0.00040383212,0.000008473476,0.00036978128,0.00013418728,0.00054101925,0.000041919462,0.00013674927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003083055,0.00010994655,0.000022708302,0.00029274414,0.00034170167,0.000493678,0.0001296408,0.00017062946,0.000049290815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004062091,0.00006504232,0.00080859545,0.0052415333,0.00015688485,0.000013905324,0.008309871,3.7078158e-7,0.00001780215,0.7303933,0.25207633,0.002875788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012104402,0.00019481975,0.00003315691,0.003482205,0.000068710935,5.513421e-7,0.00039619245,0.000006663152,0.000013687628,0.0010699516,0.9944527,0.00016031488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00888123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012523942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7423764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043491364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025692512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385589434","doi":"10.59962/9780774868280-011","title":"9 Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.015325412147578215,"score_gpt":0.18952136478962014,"score_spread":0.17419595264204193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385589434","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005625229,0.00027308066,0.0000050322333,0.00018322034,0.000351179,0.0005431376,0.0010286076,0.000021362497,0.99703187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.108353235,0.00008942523,0.000011855314,0.00006799669,0.00013063193,6.660616e-7,0.0000070038327,0.000014771334,0.8913244],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838215,0.000070511844,0.00019422677,0.00024726905,0.000871286,0.00023453949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900746,0.00007269511,0.00027872738,0.00021113578,0.00029194987,0.00013801684],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032452875,0.00008032142,0.0003513751,0.000020201194,0.0007980206,0.00006343111,0.00081642735,0.0001292116,0.00119692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002867307,0.0001595277,0.000109205466,0.000017220827,0.00036096913,0.000049946804,0.00030502272,0.00023154764,9.4062705e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027629982,0.000016122542,0.000057599573,0.00017504909,0.00017275265,0.00017817938,0.005279476,0.00001758594,0.000002129052,0.038406722,0.944835,0.010831727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012603716,0.000036580477,0.00010038562,0.00017728908,0.00005393397,0.0000025306526,0.001333501,7.464555e-7,5.689251e-7,0.00055675925,0.9974475,0.00016416247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99952126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99983776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10779071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000245103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018719258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385598169","doi":"10.59962/9780774866033-003","title":"An Overview of <i>Carter v Canada</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03198619633134538,"score_gpt":0.22736620108634908,"score_spread":0.1953800047550037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385598169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00086683274,0.0035809448,0.000003794778,0.000014407879,0.00024017792,0.0002541264,0.00072864204,0.000025266327,0.9942858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.068667494,0.0013997521,0.000034139382,0.000059764996,0.00014942921,2.0684526e-7,0.000022271524,0.00002035142,0.9296466],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985452,0.00007742117,0.00023167962,0.00031059986,0.00062940776,0.00020563291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986197,0.000041788764,0.00035536595,0.00025099682,0.000566331,0.00016582507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001664,0.00009550404,0.00052940845,0.00001756642,0.00027251535,0.00009580492,0.00048164948,0.00028532188,0.00067870505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012584986,0.00023246645,0.0001436049,0.000012911874,0.00044838717,0.000111556124,0.00010043441,0.00017516571,5.76106e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004703837,0.00016952818,0.00050331786,0.0034940424,0.00091690203,0.0024686314,0.009007772,0.0000053577587,0.0000681484,0.20679913,0.629052,0.14746813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019102305,0.000032736418,0.00013322523,0.001066434,0.000103022096,0.0000038817293,0.0006862226,6.139255e-7,0.0000036382835,0.0008047614,0.99674404,0.00023040998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9993202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99982786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36769202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001302253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020642541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9479707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385598822","doi":"10.59962/9780774861076-010","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada Judgments","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.014926406300226071,"score_gpt":0.18954356777884995,"score_spread":0.17461716147862388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385598822","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00074170885,0.0005589989,0.0000023292987,0.000040045375,0.00045828253,0.00045548152,0.00043414053,0.000016288233,0.9972927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08729194,0.0003619381,0.0000061206847,0.000016656591,0.000077247096,1.5770827e-7,0.0000042556344,0.000013568459,0.9122281],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849063,0.0000487736,0.00021730481,0.0002223722,0.00076946313,0.00025145742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867064,0.0001245358,0.00043514743,0.00022178642,0.00044572764,0.00010219219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027486178,0.00008430118,0.00036261044,0.000012312878,0.00062949525,0.00009896547,0.0006744035,0.00021921148,0.00018427255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027834509,0.00015836499,0.0001124179,0.000008295885,0.0006300569,0.000061903156,0.00015396612,0.00018398397,0.0000015799311],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043547774,0.000022443981,0.0003131712,0.0004329893,0.00045458094,0.00013178536,0.0022309388,0.0000033541876,0.0000060438915,0.057620034,0.9183526,0.020388503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021419747,0.000024667766,0.00016821401,0.00044938584,0.00005937783,0.0000012187786,0.00063769537,0.000001118483,0.0000015674558,0.0012049926,0.9970742,0.00016336211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9988046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99970454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086550236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018854404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024661664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6457937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385862342","doi":"10.59962/9780774854443","title":"Eagle Down Is Our Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eagle; Law; Political science; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.019555838676225484,"score_gpt":0.22730905844803587,"score_spread":0.20775321977181038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385862342","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018224565,0.0005974517,0.000018385104,0.000032245847,0.00041786509,0.0004922504,0.00050114916,0.00012132844,0.9976371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01976313,0.00021305778,0.000062174644,0.00017118752,0.00052676216,3.6488765e-7,0.000015271491,0.000026234293,0.9792218],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980205,0.00008797149,0.00025330205,0.0004397827,0.000772838,0.00042558953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861187,0.000051698567,0.00037979873,0.00024782892,0.00047677953,0.00023201991],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042895018,0.00012922287,0.0005241098,0.00003964316,0.0008369595,0.00031712966,0.0007435166,0.00069422834,0.00037739644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019737861,0.0003223302,0.00024637388,0.000029185945,0.0007352184,0.0001763349,0.00020169791,0.00036232694,0.00003299094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013304762,0.000034432564,0.000026306418,0.00023572883,0.00011456294,0.0002921699,0.0041642636,1.5803629e-7,0.0000013013597,0.011551141,0.96815985,0.015406757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033934676,0.000039574457,0.000033705222,0.00063282374,0.0000984456,0.000004751516,0.0015374973,3.4061884e-7,0.0000021383212,0.0031084777,0.9938656,0.00033726773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9599215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93563664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025705757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024471432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082064734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385870803","doi":"10.59962/9780774851954-015","title":"New Directions for Canadian Environmental Law and Policy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental law; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.017713804409603087,"score_gpt":0.21335545332031775,"score_spread":0.19564164891071467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385870803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006615998,0.0005926456,0.000027875758,0.000036333226,0.00011845905,0.0004791768,0.000928105,0.000028549819,0.9977227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02134258,0.00045652752,0.0001427548,0.00009000503,0.0003810212,3.061338e-7,0.000013828853,0.000017221368,0.97755575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992142,0.000012531532,0.00010832701,0.00023108356,0.00018740598,0.00024645924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993365,0.000041780586,0.00011027079,0.000084121486,0.000046481044,0.00038088058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011560809,0.00007307401,0.00022139587,0.000053020423,0.0009399421,0.000134533,0.00017365575,0.00030840296,0.00018760431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009221443,0.00018418004,0.000088466215,0.000006801391,0.0005507216,0.00008273934,0.00004722479,0.00011299951,0.0000017208987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002249499,0.000016625057,0.00007928461,0.0001514572,0.00023357134,0.00012309241,0.00567037,2.5864387e-7,0.0000041223234,0.5949325,0.11779184,0.28097442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022575237,0.00002717973,0.00009008435,0.00012915002,0.00005615673,0.000004666209,0.0003127566,2.5210218e-7,4.2936207e-7,0.005962972,0.9930176,0.00017295837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9993956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8752258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026671632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006871095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7510644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386131694","doi":"10.59962/9780774854801-014","title":"Foregoing Life-Sustaining Treatment: The Canadian Law Reform Commission and the President’s Commission","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Law; Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.03332835995999916,"score_gpt":0.22772239544262152,"score_spread":0.19439403548262235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386131694","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013353273,0.0015484073,0.000004077904,0.00024208688,0.00011485485,0.0008293331,0.00008238089,0.00003967191,0.99700564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3142702,0.00043585306,0.000012219633,0.00006893161,0.00015374407,7.4027616e-7,0.0000056351705,0.000017507726,0.68503517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985803,0.00012006381,0.00022361506,0.00026707602,0.00046344157,0.00034552792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864197,0.00020096872,0.00031509544,0.00024876648,0.0002440659,0.0003491354],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073619944,0.00013692363,0.00038899318,0.000036296577,0.004275459,0.000519213,0.0005168981,0.00038749975,0.00009081669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039773782,0.00016212848,0.00014127146,0.000015287367,0.0020709687,0.00013161282,0.0001681645,0.0003072569,0.0000011808361],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013599392,0.000015485466,0.00009471029,0.00017593212,0.0002793007,0.00025755816,0.032385435,0.0000015870743,2.827392e-7,0.8827257,0.018252004,0.06567599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008650815,0.000046153422,0.00010643407,0.0006839734,0.00015088162,0.00000815336,0.004138055,0.00000872556,3.9653216e-7,0.0058525773,0.9879499,0.00018966966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9992912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9696979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059795164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081196835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99702084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387476091","doi":"10.61575/mjls.1.mastering","title":"Mastering the Drift – An Introduction to the Michigan Journal of Law &amp; Society","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Merck Canada Inc. (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.030704839606973598,"score_gpt":0.3058395950936951,"score_spread":0.2751347554867215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387476091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62540203,0.0002890972,0.0020104542,0.3077781,0.0046926145,0.00046979706,0.000004528235,0.00005566273,0.059297733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991057,0.000005889373,0.00012424034,0.001743205,0.0042434726,0.000005773091,3.6297064e-7,0.000004312834,0.0028157907],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901015,0.00022114061,0.00015413683,0.00007918319,0.00040570446,0.00012966576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962217,0.00003424025,0.00009401305,0.000111813635,0.00009177849,0.000045967296],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002169572,0.0000389244,0.00006909983,0.000009350814,0.0018287923,0.00013605745,0.0003704196,0.000014730946,0.00038780918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047313995,0.000020777416,0.000060918042,0.00021975677,0.000085769076,0.00019323593,0.0000803644,0.0001634034,0.000006744011],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003342291,0.00007963872,0.00036778435,0.000010659493,0.000056016157,7.198385e-7,0.46330512,0.0015870034,0.003795054,0.4148071,0.11189674,0.0040607513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000335085,0.000041841795,0.00007072671,0.0000011699764,0.0000059310555,0.0000044828166,0.04585637,0.000005444432,0.000058825277,0.0009877443,0.95290035,0.000033632863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075130146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03227042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8410036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003316399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008624705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387565677","doi":"10.1515/9780887559310-010","title":"<i>Daniels v. Canada</i> beyond Jurisprudential Interpretation: What to Do Once the Horse Has Left the Barn","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Manitoba Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Barn; Interpretation (philosophy); Horse; Law; Political science; Philosophy; History; Archaeology; Biology","score_opus":0.021581328086954978,"score_gpt":0.21729136929445747,"score_spread":0.1957100412075025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387565677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029201497,0.0017914955,0.00011890448,0.001816833,0.0012276786,0.0008474519,0.00006719062,0.000028253324,0.9938102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31826317,0.0009465502,0.000030953903,0.001201696,0.0014206253,0.0000022165723,0.000013873255,0.000045648947,0.67807525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981017,0.0001581558,0.00021871296,0.0003511468,0.00088207587,0.0002882067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985361,0.00022902402,0.000296922,0.00039480775,0.0004063405,0.00013679743],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037807066,0.00022194933,0.0003260312,0.000038635193,0.0015618523,0.0005039887,0.0012055412,0.00020538241,0.00014124055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003655606,0.00018546052,0.00015915796,0.000018395354,0.0006279296,0.0002405288,0.000449262,0.0003796548,0.000009054318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019072786,0.000026667698,0.00002652357,0.000245032,0.0005402646,0.00030209392,0.112482496,0.000080014266,0.000022752727,0.7390305,0.10411544,0.042937532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009971012,0.000021480102,0.000011737971,0.00048898754,0.00012663365,0.0000023360576,0.024426362,0.0000018732944,0.00005199252,0.0007849178,0.97376835,0.00021561365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81851184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9883577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8696529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023696992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013961666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387565703","doi":"10.1515/9780887559310","title":"Daniels v. Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Manitoba Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.02695305703765634,"score_gpt":0.20383362988505588,"score_spread":0.17688057284739955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387565703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000844502,0.00049453985,0.000014678171,0.000046474404,0.00040186828,0.00029078044,0.00007655874,0.00003414271,0.9985565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004420392,0.00009697205,0.000023069568,0.000046706726,0.0004439606,2.4540157e-7,0.0000172006,0.000013837839,0.9949376],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868995,0.00010219773,0.00013702946,0.00025078264,0.0005893522,0.00023070382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899906,0.00009012404,0.00024842154,0.00021174291,0.0003201736,0.0001304992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013870558,0.0001455997,0.00034802457,0.000036537018,0.00043685603,0.000034299723,0.00054656086,0.00026787727,0.00009866311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030683022,0.00019131943,0.00009702399,0.0000141040655,0.00028302046,0.00005917408,0.00016353036,0.00022999037,0.0000030541776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024450645,0.000021322581,0.000030523624,0.00046649342,0.00022586295,0.0005585646,0.006995613,0.0000030145968,0.000008873979,0.24398927,0.74284256,0.004833438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000115929666,0.000009608624,0.000008877252,0.00027474732,0.00006266436,6.4124606e-7,0.004095375,2.6479526e-7,0.000032295677,0.0005008003,0.9947057,0.00019311081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9931374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99852717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25186312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053416396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067994236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387867841","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4585828","title":"The Gatekeepers of the Federal Arbitration Act: An Empirical Analysis of the FAA in the Lower Courts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Federal Arbitration Act; Arbitration; Business; Law; Compulsory arbitration; Political science","score_opus":0.01809509419109677,"score_gpt":0.32635863190896697,"score_spread":0.3082635377178702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387867841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98095095,0.0003597716,0.00002254627,0.014547461,0.00026575127,0.0001751515,0.0000016081559,0.0000073112756,0.003669452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986322,0.00055365096,3.8149966e-7,0.00022217903,0.00021972366,0.00000428311,5.075864e-7,0.000005200996,0.00036186396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720967,0.00077609543,0.00032898955,0.00010428797,0.00077442994,0.0008065351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913293,0.00022516774,0.00029572134,0.00019579098,0.00012168576,0.000028709304],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005705515,0.00007650986,0.00016326398,0.000064078486,0.0013461142,0.00013335666,0.0008149557,0.00007050249,0.000009645413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031101343,0.000030887477,0.00023756633,0.0018874486,0.00027943472,0.00016572728,0.000030485362,0.00083667965,0.0000014018494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021790217,0.00051407435,0.33954614,0.000018072982,0.00170118,0.0000042446027,0.122783534,0.003246995,0.0012635061,0.5160695,0.0018465325,0.012788341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075629464,0.0005091226,0.43706745,0.00008174847,0.00072170637,0.000018621227,0.19899042,0.0016251409,0.00028336296,0.3423102,0.017282052,0.00035390354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006331405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23385891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2275275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024007258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002220817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388137275","doi":"10.1515/9781552389911-015","title":"Canadian Bill of Rights, 1960","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bill of rights; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.021970299098232567,"score_gpt":0.21173792215251358,"score_spread":0.18976762305428102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388137275","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000065459695,0.00025488934,0.000021513299,0.000024912228,0.00021694392,0.00025881917,0.00007089942,0.000024843326,0.9990617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018200167,0.00006951448,0.000073245246,0.000020638116,0.00020057021,8.145535e-8,0.000008018116,0.000012818666,0.981415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989595,0.000040984956,0.00017429145,0.00022223603,0.00037424924,0.00022874305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883795,0.000040794515,0.000284647,0.00021698585,0.00035665813,0.00026293873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018766297,0.00014745213,0.0003714392,0.00016025308,0.0003837777,0.00001250237,0.0004984689,0.00042471394,0.0008954113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011040612,0.00014505099,0.00014521625,0.000010374557,0.0009319569,0.00007060568,0.0000726661,0.00015684645,0.000020904952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029519682,0.0000056541016,0.000008782965,0.000075771655,0.00010686842,0.00004066063,0.009004313,1.416586e-7,0.0000049819246,0.9793395,0.01000699,0.0013768097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012443995,0.000043987613,0.0000042310603,0.00021731814,0.00007807624,3.801003e-7,0.00013625542,0.0000013854241,0.000049319235,0.020205053,0.9789655,0.00017401585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9817064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9411347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96895856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016806019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009852808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9804126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388892008","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4640252","title":"Getting Personal: The Promise and Potential Missteps of Canada’s New Privacy Legislation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Business; Internet privacy; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.01190959722124211,"score_gpt":0.25629803267087276,"score_spread":0.24438843544963065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388892008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94516975,0.0041139056,0.00038046538,0.04230865,0.0004453573,0.00029444293,0.0000015391814,0.000039292823,0.0072465874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99171364,0.00086984044,0.0000053067406,0.00004498953,0.00091485714,0.0000010381432,5.3061774e-7,0.000007497392,0.0064422814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982154,0.000106883024,0.00018349546,0.00009309839,0.00044967304,0.00095148495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955976,0.00005330412,0.00017213362,0.00004328625,0.00008651191,0.00008500848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020366923,0.000062254105,0.00010193694,0.00003555963,0.0008562657,0.000077019555,0.00017185618,0.000039186176,0.000012688797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028470645,0.00004498595,0.000035762874,0.00024054914,0.0000613784,0.00017576126,0.000023405866,0.00044538314,0.0000013169321],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021988076,0.00006550274,0.014464504,0.00012027822,0.0006349247,0.00003701163,0.16296637,0.00023010901,0.0050228834,0.5252691,0.037473492,0.25349596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020358183,0.0003377001,0.01877971,0.00023193103,0.00016882677,0.00022718613,0.17645523,0.0009003024,0.00021910982,0.4929107,0.307056,0.00067746715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.59849584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8093212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2695825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033054297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016332813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9892437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390722069","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4668394","title":"Broader Application and Implications: A Federal Court (Non-IRB) Case Law Year in Review for 2023","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Federal court; Supreme court","score_opus":0.01375665776531502,"score_gpt":0.3370695961550257,"score_spread":0.32331293838971065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390722069","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032037444,0.79552025,0.034426216,0.09608874,0.00065767934,0.0042700274,0.00003519336,0.00017577178,0.036788687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9450932,0.053111196,0.000030530526,0.00028350504,0.00057475903,0.00011643051,0.0000022098955,0.00001185801,0.00077627326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986814,0.000054644603,0.00023052219,0.00016965799,0.00012532475,0.00073841546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965966,0.000071436385,0.000061949875,0.00006197685,0.000080305945,0.00006464601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021700927,0.00007283742,0.0001406169,0.0000449241,0.0004761247,0.00018277598,0.00009729496,0.0000626547,0.000009362567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006519401,0.00006461626,0.000051202533,0.00026846086,0.00006129761,0.00026762657,0.000010710349,0.00045153146,0.000015697584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006135639,0.000018044328,0.00019555866,0.00025338636,0.000029918192,0.000007075807,0.0006449315,6.1797874e-7,0.000040761275,0.96843207,0.0022084531,0.02816305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032271398,0.000085048,0.0001025388,0.0007122244,0.00005032493,0.00083388464,0.0038617444,0.00006568452,0.0000034076231,0.5626138,0.43114468,0.00020392604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009678246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06950082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9130558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041576702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015031965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391090089","doi":"","title":"Marriage and Advance Consent to Sex: A Feminist Judgment in <em>R v JA</em>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.22092094369302567,"score_gpt":0.5575377292074917,"score_spread":0.336616785514466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391090089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9339383,0.010514306,0.00016144419,0.0016197796,0.00074740744,0.0010113633,0.000049860268,0.000037620262,0.051919896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904625,0.005716611,0.000078181445,0.0006666208,0.0003238071,0.000069281,5.686027e-7,0.000025412563,0.0026570295],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971068,0.00037039447,0.00075300614,0.000468974,0.00078333716,0.00051752076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979907,0.0006002761,0.000495909,0.00026046604,0.00018402985,0.00046857118],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002317352,0.00023643422,0.00065542106,0.00038413669,0.0004477293,0.0012126263,0.0014218392,0.00010994815,0.0025765323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010335814,0.00017990037,0.000078339515,0.000826634,0.0002376807,0.0014832283,0.0005793941,0.00017467476,0.000030767696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039141576,0.00036763793,0.7625849,0.00019928336,0.000106450585,0.0001445969,0.0135595,0.00001202303,0.032656536,0.0033939427,0.035486236,0.15109748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019631076,0.00007560391,0.3522637,0.0034193895,0.00005650765,0.000013195593,0.008133702,0.0000025629954,0.010166648,0.024779266,0.5979789,0.0011474505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011101095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014091104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56249267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022330332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003856926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391600400","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1432","title":"“’Tis a rock—a crag—a cape? A cape? say rather a peninsula!” The Supreme Court of Canada’s Revisitation of the National Concern Doctrine","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Doctrine; Peninsula; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Political science; Cape; Law; Geography; Archaeology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04229890318743268,"score_gpt":0.3157237289327867,"score_spread":0.27342482574535404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391600400","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028607504,0.23986465,0.000092363836,0.3170794,0.0031235202,0.010693444,0.00083667587,0.00030021198,0.39940223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984652,0.009105368,0.000008509136,0.0022173116,0.00035924194,0.00007308639,0.000012737156,0.000019984956,0.003551766],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962946,0.0005879037,0.00075883203,0.0002656296,0.001725298,0.00036772786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974556,0.00041668516,0.00056558975,0.000297514,0.0011714792,0.00009314064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002809236,0.00018456922,0.00055546005,0.000029680143,0.0006331958,0.000042751843,0.00072592107,0.00007772368,0.0005790319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013859739,0.000114358125,0.00020601254,0.0010439637,0.00025968088,0.00019528468,0.0001017815,0.0001830524,0.000028812414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033067612,0.000087593864,0.0021238036,0.0060018566,0.0002962418,0.000008518015,0.00791491,0.00011468676,0.0009750607,0.47504795,0.50584733,0.001548984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020697006,0.000022897504,0.0010997356,0.0024146105,0.00010526149,0.000002616011,0.00045727726,0.000051245843,0.00013473995,0.0017627998,0.9935748,0.00016704563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5747144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68770045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9560445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022676963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029187296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6339993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391714162","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_3868","title":"Same-Sex Marriage in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03137412374798617,"score_gpt":0.25685168362118244,"score_spread":0.22547755987319626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391714162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003614914,0.00016132927,0.0000011399519,0.0010630329,0.0009614644,0.00020636966,0.000021587779,0.00006405461,0.99748486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034650553,0.000255538,0.0000037195373,0.00038287253,0.0007008384,0.0000060759357,0.0000059840386,0.000029453116,0.96396494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986451,0.000021035348,0.00026063164,0.0002372101,0.00054951716,0.0002864894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995036,0.00012558485,0.00009070965,0.00011920997,0.00004751277,0.000113374044],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003283175,0.00014095297,0.0003005618,0.00007076752,0.00014488088,0.000050102408,0.00024838944,0.0001979227,0.0025003175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080536796,0.00013350097,0.00004445059,0.000069623304,0.00006197975,0.00006088892,0.000047468755,0.0002225743,0.0003213475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018246448,0.0000016399052,0.00025390618,0.000040906492,0.000015764515,0.00019068249,0.0010756289,0.000001418239,3.2024877e-7,0.9183805,0.07538278,0.004654619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046513072,0.0000040222913,0.000052630738,0.00009680802,0.0000044211715,1.9427547e-7,0.0011404593,9.115262e-7,8.412086e-7,0.042291813,0.95616245,0.00019891962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99997133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8807797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007657902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049684667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99841154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391796722","doi":"10.7202/1100533ar","title":"NOTES FOR THE REMARKS CONCERNING CANADA AND THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Human rights; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022229991756490916,"score_gpt":0.27704811944173385,"score_spread":0.2548181276852429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391796722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9088984,0.0002509254,0.0015858319,0.0208063,0.0011710734,0.0007778423,0.00007174752,0.00005529943,0.06638255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981858,0.000027998818,0.000011279484,0.00009220913,0.00045978147,0.000017756494,0.00001013977,0.0000036836084,0.0011913512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994359,0.00004743873,0.00013652816,0.000083473205,0.00019620558,0.00010045448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884593,0.00080539036,0.000115624076,0.000053948712,0.00015356176,0.000025513848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058718165,0.000039784678,0.00008211805,0.000024237112,0.0005618317,0.00004667213,0.00020644735,0.000031611387,0.000019784822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003500471,0.000028057068,0.000034017216,0.00010380855,0.00017156571,0.000081508006,0.000016492546,0.000053575375,7.297707e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003165461,0.0000031731845,0.0009905488,0.000014659977,0.000043174838,0.0000019754104,0.0054397713,0.00011654928,0.00007166908,0.9915165,0.0010058471,0.00076447934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020678178,0.000056112796,0.016206408,0.00028665,0.000117759344,0.0000081448525,0.007058037,0.013410031,0.0005606659,0.18323097,0.7766889,0.00030851693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9702126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99012834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80828553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014955238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034260136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4321212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392031090","doi":"10.5040/9798216024354.ch-060","title":"Passage of the British North America Act (Constitution Act), Canada (1867)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.008000494164984686,"score_gpt":0.22893217305100327,"score_spread":0.22093167888601858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392031090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014602931,0.00057179615,0.000017907401,0.0006527564,0.00067468046,0.00029134445,0.00006350907,0.000059830523,0.9975222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37934664,0.0002555863,0.000011691762,0.0004164028,0.0006278398,0.000003971395,0.000006527506,0.000026748134,0.6193046],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987604,0.00009118581,0.00018287504,0.0001818228,0.0005438477,0.00023983886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993929,0.000026530533,0.000286677,0.0001613798,0.000055423217,0.00007707892],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008740913,0.000115914096,0.00026649077,0.000020511377,0.00044534678,0.000121370605,0.00038232896,0.00014489691,0.0016389858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011769468,0.00009275656,0.00007041124,0.00034665127,0.00033419754,0.00005685135,0.000027084381,0.00013438403,0.000010485447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.6057464e-7,0.00001427989,0.0019606801,0.000026781576,0.00002016455,0.000006840028,0.00012681201,9.693603e-7,6.2159353e-7,0.0010033945,0.9805513,0.016287502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043087228,0.0000064432,0.0018758487,0.00016255678,0.000015131686,7.288116e-7,0.0002161722,2.0796652e-7,0.0000023599132,0.000047365174,0.9975004,0.00012970765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.999221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3792006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013706087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032254206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393404971","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i3.1306","title":"Recoding Family Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06788317923485174,"score_gpt":0.3306276168105635,"score_spread":0.26274443757571175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393404971","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006527093,0.00012641736,0.0000143182115,0.0018576221,0.0015636144,0.00006358785,0.0000072021753,0.00015421753,0.98968595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99656284,0.00022335205,0.00004585587,0.0005667246,0.0013712192,0.0000026147263,6.703355e-7,0.000012097718,0.0012146027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998661,0.00016761861,0.00022584532,0.000116486444,0.00043684745,0.00039219434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994405,0.000080001126,0.00010074751,0.00006463246,0.0001250103,0.00018912641],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017163425,0.00007236385,0.00013693706,0.00004445729,0.008061871,0.00021269744,0.0002235544,0.000076939126,0.00013822701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000099932804,0.00006323593,0.00007909761,0.00039897152,0.00014289044,0.00044140103,0.00003370712,0.0002227921,0.0004944121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031068664,0.000008502532,0.00006883437,0.0000064776364,0.000012638895,0.000056370984,0.0007333735,0.000007885838,0.00011914731,0.99021,0.0032927769,0.0054809027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112502225,0.000019151868,0.000099901175,0.000044076463,0.000005712406,0.000009353256,0.0021541747,0.0000044718813,0.000088460816,0.014329902,0.9830363,0.00009598515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03744544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06405716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9900358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008775124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002045777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395031071","doi":"10.29173/alr2742","title":"Reflections on the Supreme Court of Canada's Decision in R. v. Sharma","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.06710597164751762,"score_gpt":0.3782064975901769,"score_spread":0.31110052594265925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395031071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007939888,0.0106057115,0.0000010463316,0.07040761,0.00050457957,0.00074832287,0.0000060703396,0.000021758044,0.909765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97877717,0.015703205,0.0000023528394,0.003306051,0.00009076643,0.00003860892,0.0000018204505,0.0000065575064,0.002073454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893194,0.00015607337,0.0002555842,0.00011674133,0.00035091862,0.00018871401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866307,0.0009943638,0.00007585528,0.00015196411,0.000066606226,0.000048134945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009767003,0.000058283156,0.000190904,0.000017550794,0.00029592987,0.000015648227,0.00022992925,0.000029227633,0.00031620087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011682945,0.000037772406,0.000042591324,0.00090879435,0.00006248465,0.000059769194,0.000024396615,0.00008445625,0.000063532345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035799637,0.00001777591,0.00022459809,0.00028963407,0.000009349562,0.000003025032,0.00082794926,0.0000049441646,0.000008915768,0.826287,0.16991673,0.0024064982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031101725,0.000008905271,0.0002965811,0.0019242031,0.000007157803,2.3374128e-7,0.00012910356,0.0000020679743,0.000012809588,0.0017223769,0.9958162,0.000049259288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9798149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99799436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9708373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007630729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041046843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34621778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395031145","doi":"10.29173/alr2749","title":"Twenty Years After Krieger v Law Society of Alberta: Law Society Discipline of Crown Prosecutors and Government Lawyers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Crown (dentistry); Legal profession; Sociology; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.014371476569757418,"score_gpt":0.2890085289352133,"score_spread":0.2746370523654559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395031145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29458874,0.14852299,0.000022063427,0.038489044,0.002105047,0.007992109,0.00036827684,0.00024726742,0.50766444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96208483,0.03025979,0.00009468413,0.0029477875,0.00019073521,0.00010445869,0.00001144239,0.000031694,0.00427456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768597,0.00012496814,0.0006196489,0.00038249925,0.0007756547,0.00041123803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869317,0.00041551227,0.0003401401,0.0002961065,0.000098498094,0.00015658744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009457833,0.00020851484,0.0006747383,0.0000035510375,0.00028960817,0.00005251438,0.0002621574,0.00014854556,0.00019497258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009241794,0.0001719698,0.00042742884,0.00048912124,0.0010827029,0.00034535123,0.00020764892,0.0001365293,0.000034698776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020141051,0.00012832794,0.0025367916,0.0074105007,0.00024746143,0.0000018469183,0.017405277,9.656924e-7,0.00008531654,0.9555737,0.01575663,0.00083306315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023263696,0.0000514776,0.00053755974,0.0028025513,0.00016508967,6.4983135e-7,0.00081092946,0.000005301677,0.0001842073,0.0013005286,0.99364126,0.0002678161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17536479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.119687006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97788465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008101948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008538314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89637643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395048323","doi":"10.21991/cf29469","title":"Abortion Rights Without Law: A Constitutional Reflection","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional law; Abortion; Political science; Law; Reflection (computer programming); Computer science; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.023635029024650367,"score_gpt":0.3222993437780244,"score_spread":0.298664314753374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395048323","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018936906,0.004889913,0.1729125,0.008198009,0.010640996,0.0011133335,0.0003022656,0.0015010078,0.7985483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942953,0.00012785879,0.0005345967,0.0010535094,0.0016198464,0.00017864352,0.00016583492,0.000014145311,0.002010242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99585754,0.00018367644,0.00082205905,0.00086922804,0.0012226743,0.001044798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982366,0.00018832064,0.00017115349,0.00028671778,0.0006703739,0.00044680896],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009482135,0.00043295787,0.00043783308,0.00040133198,0.005785422,0.0007972715,0.0003772981,0.00045894607,0.00077147223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003425345,0.00041113942,0.00033226845,0.0010447579,0.019634295,0.0025507347,0.00009076997,0.00053828274,0.0012497989],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005187019,0.00009386961,0.0016447748,0.000056855533,0.00009668744,0.00006645415,0.0003127353,0.00020109443,0.00025523943,0.98622584,0.010301682,0.0006929145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004586497,0.00004161944,0.000031907275,0.00046582837,0.000078967896,0.00020340715,0.00074258714,0.00028988117,0.00019173702,0.18514952,0.811854,0.000491916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067171827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009412742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99240166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009277853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005154055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395059230","doi":"10.29173/alr2713","title":"The Most-Cited Law Review Articles of All Time by the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.018299248359572924,"score_gpt":0.26902947451643044,"score_spread":0.2507302261568575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395059230","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046352076,0.75872356,2.450555e-7,0.077419445,0.00015212347,0.0011855467,0.000041016196,0.000008744164,0.1620058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6570608,0.2846785,0.0000038000317,0.047906898,0.00012728763,0.00023848632,0.000026417652,0.000028524659,0.009929297],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975179,0.0007372694,0.0005811098,0.00015027284,0.0007358842,0.00027756422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813116,0.0008859415,0.00038880782,0.00034773693,0.00017125883,0.000075124786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021597447,0.00010588287,0.00044161142,0.000003697685,0.00095295854,0.000021238375,0.00069848,0.000019634967,0.0008094028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005558522,0.00006089954,0.00009920719,0.00054767553,0.0003225292,0.00008480332,0.000106792155,0.00012526356,0.000009815556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032506719,0.000029282166,0.000024393745,0.0021120352,0.00006402849,7.8123185e-7,0.0003100148,6.2914756e-7,0.000041030413,0.40854305,0.5873127,0.0015588222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000416621,0.000021666017,0.0000025355369,0.0017419893,0.00010032849,0.0000016580233,0.00007529422,0.0000021353926,0.000042126954,0.00047659472,0.9974145,0.0000795074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97264266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9382694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65659726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007277731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049731584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8862393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395458459","doi":"10.1515/9780228020219-013","title":"8 Courts, Legislatures, and the Politics of Judicial Decision-Making (or Perhaps the Notwithstanding Clause Isn’t Such a Bad Thing after All)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Politics; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01614891151882679,"score_gpt":0.25573111559982575,"score_spread":0.23958220408099895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395458459","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011297693,0.0002725307,0.00007393005,0.001178427,0.0006410283,0.00094686646,0.00036714674,0.00010994768,0.9962971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43650088,0.000721196,0.00005435262,0.00038685507,0.00071565126,0.0000030647057,0.0000027156007,0.00005994745,0.5615553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972148,0.0001988603,0.00043742638,0.0005637799,0.0010519995,0.0005331196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997292,0.0013965715,0.0004334897,0.00043833588,0.00028565936,0.00015397486],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009722564,0.00043210556,0.0006825332,0.00019569349,0.0017396016,0.0003039866,0.0008021809,0.0005980905,0.000062966734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001886507,0.00027566135,0.00029601384,0.000044575325,0.0015991032,0.00023589777,0.0006855727,0.0010024417,0.0000035440746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051503,0.000006273575,0.0000043222367,0.00012877876,0.00028087234,0.00021727146,0.0135026695,0.0000041638714,4.339327e-7,0.9831621,0.0015985419,0.0005795254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004922408,0.00003983652,0.0000055943965,0.0016595434,0.0006334194,0.000005155694,0.0024822967,0.00001753847,0.0000039314154,0.034785576,0.9595101,0.00036478613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018346839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049650844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95791155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035019228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030047793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396882011","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2405.06156","title":"A Sharp Test for the Judge Leniency Design","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Science and Technology Council; National Taiwan University; Academia Sinica","keywords":"Test (biology); Psychology; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Law and economics; Geology","score_opus":0.16425648747758662,"score_gpt":0.24284961424064527,"score_spread":0.07859312676305866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396882011","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055646364,0.015088857,0.42882514,0.017222473,0.017928716,0.014672473,0.0008183882,0.002650974,0.44714662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98010814,0.0005328089,0.00005719586,0.00010728369,0.00091816386,0.000011443655,0.000003851486,0.000025390924,0.01823573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984909,0.00012671342,0.00017233755,0.00067440415,0.00012808686,0.00040753424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803174,0.0010928949,0.00015303218,0.00037322653,0.00022278895,0.00012631429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009614402,0.00021576029,0.00025372344,0.000099877485,0.0009100198,0.00028799873,0.0010454284,0.0003180559,0.000099728735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051038637,0.00018046566,0.00025586228,0.00055929605,0.00032358847,0.00013621594,0.000543802,0.0004734639,0.00018196502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007358028,0.0001473688,0.00095279847,0.0005986415,0.00025354273,0.00011991209,0.010144199,0.012518677,0.000026417882,0.9388821,0.03439461,0.0018881166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004357236,0.00014491963,0.00019624621,0.0004742476,0.00071061536,0.0000012326173,0.0057112644,0.02494171,0.000060087517,0.69022876,0.27620384,0.00089133513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010462433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028512713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9244618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023780247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097151217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398138443","doi":"10.4324/9781003279112-7","title":"Navigating Judicial Disagreement","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03042245711701254,"score_gpt":0.3362594225049438,"score_spread":0.30583696538793126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398138443","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000011510426,0.002096332,0.000022394755,0.0025905296,0.0018544196,0.0002976257,0.000015800677,0.00025082202,0.99286056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036901638,0.0002910512,0.000031161613,0.00027101283,0.0056430358,0.000008860789,0.000009969753,0.000044759327,0.9567985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982844,0.000011303317,0.00033325958,0.0003478917,0.0007340546,0.00028909283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999459,0.00005827671,0.000120384866,0.00012838302,0.000098263714,0.00013566106],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041726456,0.00021002314,0.0002936491,0.000023225228,0.0004571275,0.00024513612,0.00023489028,0.0003277789,0.0041831024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038621467,0.00018260404,0.00016070915,0.000047521557,0.00023041276,0.000104930696,0.00009562898,0.0005305489,0.0026635295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012787567,0.0000030721142,0.000003249744,0.00005621737,0.000039151266,0.000020072499,0.0026649865,2.0591078e-7,0.0000010878471,0.97193533,0.010455401,0.014819969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024212766,0.00001590567,3.5347514e-7,0.000610755,0.000039517337,3.672322e-7,0.00048105212,0.0000012390201,0.0000023101538,0.23265035,0.76597434,0.00019956719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018195473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017596537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.755519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018750987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002636312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99811304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398290712","doi":"10.7910/dvn/dyzdvw","title":"Petition of John Grout Sr.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grout; Geology; Geotechnical engineering; Forensic engineering; Engineering","score_opus":0.020809713924007735,"score_gpt":0.2876695076056493,"score_spread":0.2668597936816416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398290712","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000021353339,0.0000055766345,0.000008732654,0.000013090746,0.0013929893,0.00024807814,0.98548704,0.000035376957,0.012787736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00042581448,0.0011310526,0.00003281781,0.000121893034,0.002397155,0.000012641265,0.9952275,0.000011871047,0.0006392685],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812996,0.00018315802,0.00036517583,0.00032984302,0.000684397,0.00030746104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985522,0.00007517312,0.00040571185,0.00057638244,0.0002555371,0.00013498576],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007641584,0.00017961874,0.00036621848,0.00013045246,0.000338812,0.000102053426,0.0007034649,0.00035295548,0.033221323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006834571,0.00017623375,0.000102300626,0.00027253546,0.0005152199,0.0004356276,0.00017605601,0.00019353225,0.034467712],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015781497,0.000047178728,0.000008169164,0.00019045493,0.000028037904,0.000010377608,0.00029013728,7.1548776e-8,0.000003525585,0.00062917644,0.9986894,0.00008769436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014259624,0.000050849372,0.000014491761,0.00020889462,0.00007548703,9.507503e-7,0.0004621478,2.4272404e-7,0.000010800642,0.0001979955,0.998637,0.00019855115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04464181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0202739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02436791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007200408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048100913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99760354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399060784","doi":"10.29173/mlj748","title":"Playing Hardball with Repeat Offenders: Some Thoughts on the Three-Strikes Reverse Onus Dangerous Offender Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.06903938991704757,"score_gpt":0.25879803244528704,"score_spread":0.18975864252823949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399060784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62937206,0.001447941,0.00039107667,0.010323233,0.0034202405,0.0009782363,0.000017055203,0.00027850174,0.35377166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887835,0.00017850046,0.00014676263,0.0025524877,0.008001297,0.000011458467,0.0000011443244,0.00003345994,0.00029140228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971367,0.00034099692,0.0003722592,0.00030777862,0.001210262,0.00063201156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867034,0.00025465104,0.00032806004,0.00028656935,0.00021661367,0.00024377598],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010377931,0.00025497514,0.0003231427,0.00005185477,0.00692549,0.00046317614,0.000574855,0.00015052031,0.000063125364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010267864,0.00015224355,0.00014239181,0.0002482176,0.0008135971,0.00087525847,0.000051154093,0.0007273305,0.0000875502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065286696,0.0005164118,0.008727646,0.000083709485,0.00058098155,0.0040345653,0.028894939,0.00016381427,0.00023485861,0.89889145,0.05121007,0.006008706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023628282,0.0009403276,0.002973275,0.00088532286,0.00019578006,0.0017929839,0.08912482,0.00002044304,0.00096040004,0.036350887,0.86304736,0.0013455951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10716075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46152642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86254054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026335518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021749268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99436736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399060906","doi":"10.29173/mlj968","title":"The Child and Family Services Authorities Act","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.009447094187823668,"score_gpt":0.24311224345599544,"score_spread":0.23366514926817178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399060906","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3097943,0.009016638,0.000009184299,0.0037619974,0.0010267949,0.0001014938,0.0000022604563,0.000046941394,0.6762404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99505407,0.0006896327,0.00001707525,0.0002915707,0.0037400057,0.0000021331164,3.2179378e-7,0.0000070998135,0.00019809205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989781,0.00011852597,0.00018621443,0.00008574196,0.00035545044,0.000275962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995848,0.0000719105,0.00010960262,0.000056369263,0.00009806078,0.00007928557],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007465163,0.00007707955,0.000097372154,0.000017279872,0.0061138263,0.0012749931,0.0002280616,0.000057014113,0.000010158987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013680246,0.00005029666,0.000040743584,0.00008695116,0.0002735254,0.00037876962,0.000030569074,0.00020429361,0.000012898739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002146723,0.000034140292,0.008730522,0.000040567626,0.000033721986,0.00002571539,0.0037304277,0.000004339464,0.000049994975,0.9448819,0.0042901468,0.038157027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001161998,0.000027829821,0.008209053,0.00006020768,0.000011105541,0.000031015683,0.064449176,0.000003386609,0.0000148343825,0.03839488,0.88858724,0.00009509043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3180132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7152957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90648705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000399768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040033316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399286260","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4802382","title":"Judicial Review in the Federal Courts: The Emergencies Act","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Judicial review; Political science","score_opus":0.017626122926745418,"score_gpt":0.3255535371480049,"score_spread":0.30792741422125947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399286260","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020596817,0.730487,0.00020847617,0.16957092,0.0019904228,0.00065458583,0.0000019927325,0.00007231588,0.07641748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80663824,0.18879807,7.388477e-7,0.0012793674,0.0021284034,0.0000133290805,4.3398106e-7,0.000008420774,0.0011330019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969418,0.0005277472,0.00031076826,0.00013624113,0.0006441365,0.0014393308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995478,0.00016488589,0.00008073105,0.00009826251,0.00006897373,0.00003939362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009564072,0.000106887805,0.00016320105,0.0000434475,0.0012182548,0.00038424955,0.00060800754,0.000055313158,0.00012242218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033823616,0.000053572796,0.00013952036,0.0005786096,0.00014204581,0.0003161692,0.00002022051,0.0016875985,0.00006092768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007721315,0.000028417264,0.0004034231,0.00008687698,0.00007364198,0.000017950511,0.010964451,0.000002394398,0.000008883721,0.93463355,0.024371294,0.029401371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006442237,0.00007290736,0.00016173942,0.000539515,0.000039098857,0.00009703988,0.01757605,0.0000066060884,0.0000010881058,0.29361558,0.6877091,0.00011687121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010126872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08296193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78604144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004815976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004594366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399539461","doi":"10.1163/2211-4394_ilwo_sim_032310","title":"III.W.8 DECLARATION OF MONTREAL ON LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, AND TRANSGENDER HUMAN RIGHTS","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transgender; Lesbian; Declaration; Human rights; Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09430577812742362,"score_gpt":0.37785703520284136,"score_spread":0.28355125707541773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399539461","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002217067,0.00085916166,0.000007826599,0.00037717854,0.00074537727,0.00057040894,0.9152457,0.000080677484,0.0798966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2320866,0.00051992305,0.000013339142,0.00020583803,0.00253576,0.00005071103,0.75147086,0.000032942153,0.013083995],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984664,0.00010094938,0.00034880615,0.0003549002,0.00051557977,0.00021341613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999469,0.00005040029,0.00012391413,0.00017086501,0.000077433484,0.00010843174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034767736,0.00019191923,0.00035501382,0.0001501825,0.0005057701,0.00015522355,0.00020748582,0.00038433078,0.00042272182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014046773,0.00014694633,0.00006542609,0.00020742964,0.00022077498,0.00013936803,0.000021733927,0.00022459141,0.00013049184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009724633,0.000050762526,0.000001701856,0.00019506627,0.000042776337,0.0000083885825,0.0013494857,4.4871945e-7,0.000011364419,0.0073745605,0.9907504,0.0002053518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014987856,0.000109610766,0.00002558576,0.00012924241,0.00007667092,4.843189e-7,0.00047057547,6.8621347e-7,0.00004666736,0.0047463737,0.9940588,0.00018545832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42901206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.603793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22986953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004322629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013646248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59922975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400073972","doi":"10.1515/9781773855714-101","title":"B Canadian Bill of Rights, 1960","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bill of rights; Political science; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.01954354620257779,"score_gpt":0.21180065942806003,"score_spread":0.19225711322548225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400073972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000018154587,0.0009825717,0.000009772942,0.000052708863,0.00030737638,0.00025158178,0.0001004527,0.00003736048,0.99824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020101897,0.00011099335,0.00003056428,0.000014242136,0.00013399981,9.6935004e-8,0.000007693942,0.000014512549,0.979586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899256,0.000024531286,0.00017159269,0.00023458584,0.00036642075,0.00021028217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916565,0.000040886083,0.00017213183,0.00018217071,0.00020037295,0.00023880262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001592989,0.00014954952,0.00035859435,0.00019744206,0.00026499724,0.00001848567,0.00042085623,0.00039634283,0.00032149104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000640134,0.0001438098,0.0001743126,0.0000130350845,0.0005492525,0.00005986613,0.00007967166,0.00022744265,0.000024705028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011421383,0.0000026955324,0.0000022334414,0.00011944728,0.000095219504,0.00007888135,0.004223389,3.0650318e-7,0.0000030062038,0.9910114,0.0034277015,0.0010243171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007533309,0.000024996969,0.0000014337418,0.00036538523,0.00012076331,5.0771513e-7,0.00012276082,0.0000026698153,0.000027175223,0.050259363,0.9488363,0.00016327566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9833767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9287203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94540864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019230387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092800264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5864394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400074275","doi":"10.1515/9781773855714-054","title":"6.5 Interventions at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03189424598827061,"score_gpt":0.23549413609159825,"score_spread":0.20359989010332763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400074275","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005881696,0.0017946656,0.000021736145,0.00014485643,0.0003441357,0.00024292234,0.00010659506,0.000019049477,0.99726725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014349208,0.000113789145,0.0000055540404,0.000013703436,0.00007333624,1.6676599e-7,0.000005996018,0.000010576622,0.9854277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902266,0.0000338712,0.0001815447,0.00016292224,0.00045903126,0.00013994057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926615,0.00008078847,0.00022000367,0.00018026348,0.00017924525,0.00007357717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002035444,0.00011077674,0.0002529307,0.000038462942,0.0003527742,0.000012425352,0.00042110097,0.00015271941,0.00045636165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000127911,0.00010180901,0.0002257083,0.000008383185,0.00060519116,0.000032907486,0.00023743951,0.00018554446,0.000004172537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021861666,0.000004079148,0.0000032420028,0.00048935803,0.0001324471,0.000028080314,0.002742083,0.00000161969,0.000004327159,0.9710732,0.024871811,0.00062790577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000816043,0.000017676006,0.0000052194773,0.00064967596,0.00016698145,6.0353165e-7,0.00041316845,0.0000028562986,0.000030991298,0.0041458113,0.9943823,0.00010309599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9174471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97997695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9695105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020639531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008108525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.499684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400728857","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4894400","title":"The Section 33 Democratic Accountability Concept: Proposing a Two-Pronged Approach for Judicial Review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Section (typography); Democracy; Political science; Law and economics; Judicial review; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.018247873274078154,"score_gpt":0.3373300424225857,"score_spread":0.3190821691485075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400728857","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013540516,0.7394778,0.16324016,0.023582779,0.0070894905,0.0072630774,0.000017430195,0.00052792026,0.045260835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97564024,0.018021652,0.00004429304,0.00015999288,0.0049291146,0.000103528146,0.0000029734524,0.00002223779,0.0010759734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684113,0.0003961573,0.00043060904,0.00026787753,0.00050689076,0.0015573115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915975,0.00022766394,0.00016327408,0.00011294274,0.00025504263,0.0000813303],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009391124,0.00014328182,0.00024251564,0.000035606125,0.0027768929,0.0005391553,0.00032366478,0.00008473514,0.000009562747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004993144,0.00009365063,0.000194125,0.00046533806,0.00020649168,0.0004987423,0.000019920388,0.001237496,0.000004985014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009840546,0.000095524105,0.00017720116,0.0009940579,0.0003486308,0.000001567554,0.0048928875,0.000023514242,0.0001853149,0.78820974,0.0055471077,0.19942607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065565034,0.0004761264,0.000021301017,0.0014216047,0.0004218687,0.00017480255,0.01769454,0.0013955471,0.000049740895,0.8160544,0.16111957,0.00051484414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025273473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012693775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96209973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015572545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064796545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99915266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401019393","doi":"10.29173/alr2780","title":"A Missed Opportunity: How the British Columbia Court of Appeal Could Have Helped Reform Sentencing in the Opioid Crisis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Political science; Law; Opioid; Law and economics; Economics; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.046372373735564416,"score_gpt":0.3080086319918639,"score_spread":0.2616362582562995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401019393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018122097,0.3578858,0.000008936159,0.24866761,0.00090747717,0.0036585007,0.000049688813,0.00008254193,0.37061733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93921566,0.046571705,0.0000049267087,0.010123116,0.00025710964,0.00009721764,0.000010092013,0.000016215483,0.0037039416],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981016,0.00039083138,0.00041052993,0.00023838141,0.00054983963,0.00030881068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989447,0.0004124159,0.00014595618,0.00026940092,0.00013554857,0.00009199275],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025321138,0.0001035838,0.00040894316,0.0000103913835,0.00074345816,0.0013732334,0.00053764274,0.00008552552,0.0001716811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000507386,0.000079459525,0.0001628329,0.00053630804,0.00024572512,0.00027513714,0.000049671326,0.00026132783,0.000013327777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074058435,0.00019742448,0.0014033071,0.017441865,0.00021786225,0.00021607366,0.02869608,2.3114893e-7,0.00002564251,0.09048772,0.805744,0.055562403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057740745,0.000022534072,0.00005963628,0.0065287114,0.00008743468,0.000018802546,0.0094548045,0.000008636313,0.0000017636077,0.0008282496,0.9828174,0.00011428774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96510035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97073686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9210936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000100336925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042071517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401062482","doi":"10.3138/9781552217030","title":"Essentials of Canadian Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.032678036681687256,"score_gpt":0.2412579582638367,"score_spread":0.20857992158214944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401062482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000008201516,0.000843535,0.0000030740136,0.000028531838,0.00037511325,0.00027048835,0.00019577528,0.000044602202,0.9982307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005377747,0.0005083558,0.000019770596,0.000012079747,0.0002201124,1.7906504e-7,0.000012054206,0.000016328187,0.99383336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989229,0.000078876605,0.0001694834,0.00019749026,0.00038216048,0.00024909186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989592,0.000070770686,0.00029514075,0.00019645787,0.00026831837,0.00021012867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002613412,0.00012231339,0.00039652392,0.000063610685,0.00033773016,0.000017903752,0.000553238,0.00036106558,0.00027250109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022235252,0.00015708369,0.0001457769,0.0000061840506,0.00058275915,0.00012186828,0.000086500346,0.0000917491,0.000010369991],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012785406,0.0000059974054,0.0000022822642,0.00022858143,0.0001215378,0.000023839531,0.023536935,0.0000012041759,0.000013158507,0.8902744,0.08514317,0.0006361173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010511485,0.000018943134,0.0000056044773,0.00022758434,0.000081086044,7.734175e-8,0.00065352704,3.4469795e-7,0.000040121515,0.0014723726,0.99725294,0.00014229292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91210973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044788155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00177345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6405687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401415475","doi":"10.32721/ctj.2024.72.2.pf.chan","title":"Policy Forum: The Registered Charity Appeals Process—More Reasons (and a Few Proposals) for Reform","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02790370333020237,"score_gpt":0.30493930471502184,"score_spread":0.2770356013848195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401415475","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040256426,0.0077290903,0.00014617786,0.9015403,0.0018927387,0.0021080286,0.0009408213,0.0001207054,0.045265753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96043634,0.0004869297,0.00005891599,0.0015755403,0.004109885,0.00016755903,0.000014466725,0.00006069564,0.033089694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724,0.00011613939,0.00046533757,0.00043723558,0.00023085723,0.0015103965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99684566,0.00012565702,0.00020870366,0.0002979565,0.0004007245,0.0021212725],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018991313,0.0002542036,0.00036685396,0.00040350945,0.0027753068,0.00097221736,0.00066100183,0.00026312112,0.00006105738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015014304,0.00019156435,0.00016420172,0.0009925615,0.00047532356,0.0005548382,0.00002786759,0.0005973111,0.000010675553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066900175,0.000040400202,0.0028230736,0.002313246,0.0003900949,0.0008386483,0.14021137,0.000007566903,0.000050333634,0.4130123,0.3344597,0.10578638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020790924,0.00009087795,0.00045895125,0.000771981,0.000065785855,0.0004966315,0.020613788,0.000104546525,0.000009402489,0.039269768,0.93754756,0.00036278035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8679864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9201799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022031039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061857454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401505106","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4906764","title":"\"Zapata Drift\": A Proposal For Improving Trust In The Special Litigation Committee Process&amp;nbsp;","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Business; Political science; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.0182984586858127,"score_gpt":0.31565837808227065,"score_spread":0.29735991939645795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401505106","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66477513,0.04146491,0.01004776,0.12758783,0.018956322,0.015357983,0.00025477898,0.0005970085,0.120958276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722131,0.00079967687,0.00010148515,0.00014127283,0.024483059,0.00023793773,0.00002913314,0.00005278741,0.0019415533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948819,0.0004390368,0.00072888366,0.00051544316,0.0009745572,0.0024601754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861616,0.0001643049,0.0005291506,0.00025011005,0.0003406521,0.000099643374],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009426913,0.00033062295,0.00044016333,0.00022482988,0.0010917496,0.0012112826,0.001265391,0.00046798756,0.000032364493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077044184,0.00024493877,0.00028221775,0.0004948269,0.00022137685,0.00028712835,0.00018512057,0.0059459503,0.000027703476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011399418,0.00014166388,0.0006557988,0.0008168699,0.00013600731,0.000008186125,0.054754347,0.00004466279,0.000026491547,0.9053061,0.0021670144,0.035828874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032880672,0.0001309678,0.000042298692,0.00028977246,0.00010076378,0.00003146196,0.025919857,0.00006665296,0.000009252543,0.9459245,0.026838401,0.00031727267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0086528715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22799791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30743796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001800516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028449852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401546860","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-64583-9_16","title":"The Family Law Culture War","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thornhill Medical (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.021753621460370354,"score_gpt":0.2822358485820993,"score_spread":0.26048222712172897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401546860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[2.48886e-7,0.02764136,0.0000025593959,0.0021865745,0.0015469817,0.00021307451,0.00001132231,0.00017916846,0.9682187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003740093,0.0045629353,0.00000502811,0.0007536081,0.0026745298,0.000006771269,0.000002939175,0.000026806007,0.9882273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883556,0.000012864017,0.00019334134,0.00023166212,0.0004992833,0.00022729188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950784,0.00006589425,0.00006599731,0.0001520912,0.00012432471,0.00008387059],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034098534,0.00016336128,0.00018067936,0.000014621544,0.001115191,0.00031247683,0.00035422127,0.00037340075,0.00028904987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018758768,0.000087985485,0.00014432946,0.00003486849,0.00043973487,0.00008539449,0.000062711755,0.000345983,0.002128717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.5174414e-7,8.345256e-7,8.8045425e-8,0.000017136656,0.000027681273,0.000006200991,0.001685335,2.7553648e-8,0.0000010932356,0.86139065,0.13599326,0.0008767613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010495744,0.000007960987,7.205013e-8,0.000069302565,0.000018370549,2.3333475e-7,0.0008846979,1.3427912e-7,8.370123e-7,0.3380878,0.66082025,0.00009985635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021025186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04441631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52482694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070186405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018700409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401809787","doi":"10.55016/ojs/sppp.v4i1.42359","title":"Rhetoric and Realities: What Independence of the Bar Requires of Lawyer Regulation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The School of Public Policy Publications","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Independence (probability theory); Bar (unit); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Physics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0801145769826002,"score_gpt":0.32757747224976025,"score_spread":0.24746289526716003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401809787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28579214,0.0020670262,0.0004227043,0.08730349,0.00046295908,0.0012442918,0.00007229726,0.00010390195,0.6225312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99607414,0.000373687,0.000055071974,0.00011004985,0.00021549202,0.00002993723,0.0000016097391,0.0000068209397,0.0031332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983045,0.00036215218,0.0004396594,0.0001352163,0.0005430456,0.0002154465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978185,0.00017232883,0.0005805807,0.00052178744,0.0007907288,0.00011607106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001992864,0.00007657753,0.00016831413,0.00017411038,0.00038929886,0.00011759202,0.0007841053,0.00010369484,0.00022401374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035108286,0.000048580892,0.00006426252,0.0013365275,0.0010008266,0.001930002,0.00012888182,0.00011614424,0.0000040748882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022966378,0.000035536395,0.009142504,0.000025397767,0.000020366617,5.007309e-9,0.010425053,4.948266e-7,0.00015959212,0.9777067,0.0014291065,0.0010529513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003051457,0.00006208969,0.56754297,0.00017989991,0.000057231948,0.0000024813892,0.02583073,0.0000146907305,0.0015651095,0.29344836,0.11077848,0.00021280324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07010506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025990685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.710282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006202889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014012472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9360872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401809813","doi":"10.55016/ojs/sppp.v16i1.77468","title":"A Made-in-Alberta Failure: Unfunded Oil and Gas Closure Liability","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The School of Public Policy Publications","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Closure (psychology); Liability; Environmental science; Fossil fuel; Petroleum engineering; Forensic engineering; Business; Engineering; Political science; Waste management; Accounting; Law","score_opus":0.03861231564212739,"score_gpt":0.3315484264540059,"score_spread":0.29293611081187854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401809813","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15523961,0.000099653415,0.0000070581073,0.604922,0.000077168836,0.00019440762,0.000025913543,0.0001570568,0.23927711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96597767,0.00024654172,0.000028844284,0.0003657873,0.00053001137,0.00014532129,0.00001289425,0.000013225004,0.032679677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780124,0.00047042122,0.00042489232,0.00028380024,0.0004533775,0.0005662517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979848,0.0006164738,0.0001951032,0.000521451,0.0003457131,0.00033642526],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031059766,0.00012247203,0.00022524223,0.0004780913,0.00063941674,0.00039192822,0.00074887654,0.00014353138,0.00019380561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012277255,0.0000955965,0.000073761476,0.0050906003,0.0006275263,0.0008823012,0.00015842836,0.0002494462,0.0001698051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027095223,0.000072443465,0.0535039,0.000041750485,0.000025147761,1.3364976e-7,0.0042556524,0.0000019405709,0.000086316875,0.9123411,0.024369545,0.005299368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031009858,0.000017583337,0.14300059,0.000023149325,0.000012291809,0.0000015125427,0.0034066583,0.000017991717,0.000016235503,0.11254818,0.7404727,0.00017303161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16696866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10970291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8107381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015565196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020949116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402255527","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4913155","title":"8/1/24 Draft Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(F): Reflections After a Quarter Century","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Hull; Political science; History; Engineering; Archaeology; Marine engineering","score_opus":0.008764104651959955,"score_gpt":0.2913313792665106,"score_spread":0.2825672746145506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402255527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49818015,0.19931026,0.0051694997,0.035345133,0.009524279,0.0013706958,0.000036636484,0.0007130469,0.2503503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852751,0.0031818051,0.000014625515,0.00008841366,0.0019318573,0.000019533405,0.0000012893157,0.00002190484,0.009465508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972474,0.00012792068,0.00034641495,0.00022093182,0.00049386005,0.0015634932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949485,0.000039317743,0.000102512146,0.00008515608,0.00015845131,0.00011971753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012042525,0.00014008606,0.0002023524,0.0001456311,0.0006199666,0.00041615657,0.00020986547,0.00013915527,0.00013561315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008134056,0.00011551918,0.00018372796,0.0005384171,0.00012424428,0.0005922735,0.000019578018,0.0012674418,0.00005429056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002913601,0.00040380933,0.005474369,0.00046150835,0.00089228386,0.000067253655,0.061263733,0.000011207054,0.0021980905,0.90033686,0.011881763,0.016717773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039295634,0.000473989,0.0003915901,0.00043167965,0.00010212955,0.00025932663,0.039104793,0.000016000278,0.00011343943,0.49072787,0.46755636,0.00042988497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018741915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09397097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4870949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007097384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055318633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9813288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402389718","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4952542","title":"Policy Forum: The Registered Charity Appeals Process—More Reasons (and&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;Few Proposals) for Reform","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Political science; Public administration; Public relations; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.034408246701807185,"score_gpt":0.37391599478545623,"score_spread":0.33950774808364903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402389718","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18292515,0.10039507,0.011384813,0.60721505,0.002864216,0.0062791016,0.0001509369,0.0010862823,0.08769938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9712149,0.008103708,0.00005451387,0.00043418855,0.003611612,0.000112814036,0.0000086292175,0.000054309083,0.016405364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99519795,0.00018472761,0.0005385574,0.00045249818,0.0007267338,0.002899535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869645,0.00014354031,0.0002914008,0.00028034844,0.00033947188,0.00024877666],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053343354,0.00028394893,0.00037884724,0.00017736437,0.0023825602,0.00082136417,0.0007106634,0.0002335405,0.000019827829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009463013,0.00018205938,0.00023519961,0.0008364274,0.00042885137,0.0007269565,0.00007044815,0.0016166416,0.000035128403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008101195,0.000047794736,0.00027071132,0.0002443446,0.00018745386,0.0000021944086,0.0106356265,8.3725615e-7,0.00008342503,0.9480843,0.0021758457,0.03818647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003139908,0.00018724136,0.000050748862,0.00029660674,0.00007671685,0.00022429852,0.019291744,0.0000136468025,0.000018808745,0.6101125,0.3691228,0.00029089837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017068766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10570483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7882897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016816693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010832994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402457743","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4952574","title":"State of New Jersey v. Darryl Nieves, Proposed Amicus Curiae Brief of False-Confession","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ontario Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Span (engineering); Confession (law); Life span; Theology; Physics; Art; Engineering; Structural engineering; Philosophy; Political science; Gerontology; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.012071612088610134,"score_gpt":0.29208686286281643,"score_spread":0.2800152507742063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402457743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8757209,0.08329683,0.007142745,0.006771742,0.0029697919,0.00085996994,0.000042237516,0.00018923632,0.02300653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98662245,0.006087629,0.000034111556,0.000018236347,0.0007642341,6.1894247e-7,0.0000026329312,0.000019657422,0.0064503993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723595,0.0001781512,0.0005159198,0.00022839652,0.00063172105,0.001209841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991482,0.00006751983,0.0002945798,0.00016775382,0.00018645341,0.0001354924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030369307,0.00012617804,0.0002973506,0.00012108662,0.00023684418,0.00010374289,0.0005364217,0.00008835141,0.000057703546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020979348,0.00009967251,0.00010357221,0.00047954707,0.00016519461,0.0005359772,0.00005700869,0.00089029135,0.000011820511],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001864542,0.0001644412,0.0014485493,0.0002910769,0.00048823646,0.00002120795,0.022086425,0.000029639992,0.012749922,0.5728454,0.004754861,0.38493377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080537464,0.0005429332,0.00027032167,0.00078096427,0.00011550896,0.000050368,0.010762253,0.000082519175,0.0028421811,0.7925212,0.19087902,0.00034740663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024392772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028922398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38458636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037369426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015114635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99046874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403130753","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4976260","title":"Considerations for a Tort of Family Violence","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Law; Liability","score_opus":0.033048398360761365,"score_gpt":0.3360525044494344,"score_spread":0.30300410608867306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403130753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53435874,0.2792514,0.024293937,0.020129578,0.016116073,0.0049358346,0.00033314276,0.00043307414,0.120148234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98528767,0.011435459,0.00014133658,0.000067664696,0.0018484187,0.00004347399,0.0000020414661,0.00002047727,0.001153444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752975,0.000107575026,0.00046422577,0.00024111879,0.00039884457,0.0012584997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988355,0.00019343728,0.00031879853,0.000121150704,0.00045072506,0.000080389545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030014345,0.00014705556,0.0003278645,0.00011262807,0.00046457176,0.00019956818,0.00027763494,0.00024417424,0.000018317975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005817398,0.00013456526,0.00025282026,0.000121906414,0.00014750106,0.000076491895,0.000116293246,0.0019475782,0.000009328648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011387194,0.00002496619,0.000058821042,0.00013040318,0.00017504158,0.0000016309286,0.0021286248,0.000038867038,0.00008286712,0.99225044,0.0007993582,0.0042975624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101516795,0.0000857656,0.000012577334,0.0004798153,0.00009101435,0.000012011675,0.0057269232,0.000019925366,0.000026391104,0.98655826,0.006741316,0.00014449557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009128412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0240002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45092896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080351596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026008122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403538754","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4991119","title":"&lt;span&gt;Unreasonable Steps: Trying to Make Sense of R. v. Morrison&lt;/span&gt;","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Span (engineering); Life span; Engineering; Gerontology; Medicine; Structural engineering","score_opus":0.012523327030917636,"score_gpt":0.28592383506352587,"score_spread":0.27340050803260824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403538754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7477889,0.08445715,0.012065548,0.011893903,0.0040940773,0.0012518335,0.000042383585,0.0004983886,0.13790779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97831386,0.0037057882,0.000082546525,0.00014041296,0.002064278,0.000013704265,0.0000017512247,0.00005079951,0.01562683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947916,0.0002848163,0.0006172373,0.0004101187,0.0010585403,0.0028376724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875253,0.00017542319,0.00022048842,0.00020197268,0.0003051145,0.00034446115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004194634,0.0002617834,0.00046777452,0.000258454,0.00081572897,0.00042436845,0.00045071432,0.00020549796,0.0001675022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043426105,0.00023368491,0.0002530577,0.0011413699,0.0001359697,0.00047663317,0.00007571506,0.001300812,0.00015998787],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020917358,0.00021192354,0.0013734096,0.0002798479,0.0006802922,0.00015036805,0.019870881,0.00037965545,0.007738934,0.8468321,0.009769202,0.11250421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076467416,0.0007846406,0.00034888278,0.00093645835,0.00022485986,0.00040228607,0.023346836,0.00036997456,0.00068941613,0.1293002,0.8419663,0.00086546724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005576317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032061554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83219707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013051903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061291726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403705975","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4938628","title":"Notwithstanding Judicial Review: Legal and Political Reasons Why Courts Should Not Review Laws Invoking Section 33","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Section (typography); Political science; Politics; Judicial review; Business","score_opus":0.028625565527659606,"score_gpt":0.33999120278914496,"score_spread":0.31136563726148536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403705975","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033276149,0.8524122,0.0022040282,0.10065529,0.0023578368,0.00069687626,0.00001206965,0.00022072828,0.03811332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62340444,0.3683455,0.0000079305055,0.0039555235,0.0035875905,0.000008394509,0.0000017065393,0.000023138982,0.0006657746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99582547,0.0003672432,0.00050187,0.00032966107,0.00082405296,0.0021517053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914396,0.00015470752,0.00014737323,0.000101568294,0.00017449104,0.000277887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066969497,0.00019967719,0.0004362273,0.00010904544,0.0010776124,0.00041673236,0.00020627066,0.00014602309,0.00006721986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084971776,0.00016841,0.00016331143,0.0005064164,0.00017562718,0.00078079244,0.000041169,0.0020814168,0.0000151292315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012671697,0.000016201868,0.0001518927,0.0012202124,0.00008755586,0.000028313683,0.0003395601,1.7540606e-7,0.000041663112,0.97240674,0.014449295,0.011245737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015287448,0.00015747076,0.000030265906,0.01625059,0.00030280327,0.0006596766,0.0012008125,0.000011568783,0.000012318391,0.07567565,0.9052297,0.0003163044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00816783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018874357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8967311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015639672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040470744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403730665","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4997421","title":"From Margarine to Cannabis: The Ongoing Evolution of the Criminal Law Power","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Cannabis; Power (physics); Law; Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Psychiatry; Physics","score_opus":0.009606674304234659,"score_gpt":0.2782675502228506,"score_spread":0.2686608759186159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403730665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6939171,0.047482867,0.0016091532,0.09537311,0.011974064,0.0016133913,0.00008067035,0.00012784083,0.14782178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99303466,0.00035650513,0.000007903856,0.00019153737,0.0028108286,0.000015952608,8.9796345e-7,0.000023910174,0.0035577954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967349,0.00035227172,0.00043148443,0.00028593943,0.0008310208,0.0013643601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989545,0.000056181892,0.00033306307,0.00029584233,0.00026888304,0.000091535105],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030999812,0.00019252201,0.000276017,0.00006258064,0.00088139315,0.00028637805,0.0011454739,0.0002113178,0.0000650407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025598714,0.0001117887,0.0002738161,0.0003233415,0.00023146292,0.000080061756,0.00065771525,0.0037764234,0.000027405205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002880916,0.000025345318,0.0001993698,0.000037426173,0.00022025924,0.0000017464297,0.01705298,0.00010588074,0.00008514615,0.9788699,0.0020344825,0.0013386678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075827265,0.00006387033,0.00046827915,0.00040931674,0.00018192378,0.000012182481,0.027495772,0.0000067382175,0.00004093672,0.9283482,0.042725574,0.00017139637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36119193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5078356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29911757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027548878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011290828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403911139","doi":"10.12927/hcq.2024.27429","title":"The First Nations Health Authority’s Self-Assessment Aligning With the British Columbia Cultural Safety and Humility Standard","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Healthcare Quarterly","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Island Health","funders":"","keywords":"Cultural humility; Humility; Health authority; Political science; Public relations; Psychology; Public administration; Nursing; Medicine; Cultural competence; Law","score_opus":0.012452676228092706,"score_gpt":0.3253302581487766,"score_spread":0.3128775819206839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403911139","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.112644546,0.032410804,0.0008554112,0.82465076,0.0025411374,0.004088649,0.00033133914,0.0011989952,0.021278378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99724054,0.0010113891,0.00008855325,0.00050458405,0.00049336144,0.00007671491,0.0000063612747,0.0000128698075,0.0005656455],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977449,0.00048434344,0.00033759666,0.0003283288,0.0006240485,0.00048078212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987772,0.00046702602,0.000104746556,0.0001534363,0.00029527748,0.00020231718],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023448549,0.000099213124,0.00020608737,0.00001419072,0.017445603,0.0060840487,0.00019382444,0.00007516379,0.000010684793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028635943,0.000076355944,0.000043860156,0.0005139594,0.0002948322,0.00042557387,0.0000148621175,0.0003209081,0.000002900484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056082205,0.00007266015,0.02289619,0.002146671,0.00019111045,0.000045441575,0.33732846,0.0000013752315,5.771389e-7,0.14866391,0.1035495,0.38504803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014391007,0.0005873256,0.024627378,0.00041341156,0.0000127385165,0.000013494223,0.07656651,0.000028533119,5.283203e-8,0.0012536959,0.89621365,0.00013930968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66460294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98937684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.884596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061352697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023981174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99494773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403962834","doi":"10.59962/9780774820110-023","title":"Appendix A Canadian Legal and Institutional Context","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.020926923873944233,"score_gpt":0.19079336245946868,"score_spread":0.16986643858552444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403962834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006551714,0.000809992,0.000008195554,0.000019130062,0.00020126208,0.0003416522,0.00066997355,0.000034539826,0.9972601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25241107,0.00025745586,0.000017523002,0.000041756146,0.000107238906,2.5386447e-7,0.000014958148,0.00001030372,0.74713945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901026,0.00003012608,0.0001406478,0.00028762638,0.00028479277,0.0002465302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914587,0.000021071797,0.0001578007,0.00010527912,0.00023363218,0.00033634028],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015672413,0.00009114027,0.0003076284,0.00005157018,0.00085809553,0.00019002514,0.00030025517,0.00036888683,0.0010382561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015874552,0.00021930186,0.000084752675,0.0000071220393,0.0013369081,0.00016941402,0.00008807907,0.0002142151,0.000018386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022117083,0.00001607164,0.00016888487,0.0001920501,0.00020184992,0.0010368513,0.0054929084,1.398599e-7,8.037548e-7,0.7480852,0.10618972,0.13859342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024308916,0.000025910349,0.00016635843,0.0004183395,0.000055798228,0.000019444022,0.00035810695,3.8755365e-7,1.4816172e-7,0.0034539546,0.9950304,0.00022807177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9992762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99969786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8888407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015735373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015601324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404469148","doi":"10.29173/alr2786","title":"The Regulatory Offence Revolution in Criminal Justice: The Expansive Role of Regulatory Offences","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expansive; Criminology; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Business; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.018555105770264178,"score_gpt":0.30972136901186803,"score_spread":0.29116626324160383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404469148","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0146927275,0.8785532,0.0000027891824,0.006935174,0.00082634896,0.0008111162,0.0000021278743,0.000028147293,0.098148346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9198681,0.07792033,0.0000050882013,0.0005453246,0.00032709906,0.00006615306,8.1116383e-7,0.000009395197,0.0012577014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979804,0.0004884035,0.0004869406,0.00024574474,0.00051685894,0.00028163902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817437,0.0011501407,0.00015652075,0.00032492532,0.00013920717,0.00005482563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021712286,0.00012128359,0.00027505468,0.000019833791,0.0006405075,0.00008248256,0.0005090586,0.00007354054,0.00005139218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007524766,0.0000670892,0.000117751646,0.00058218517,0.0008635545,0.00033095578,0.00005137613,0.00018201281,0.00004539368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040006566,0.000010806312,0.000071355236,0.0025409258,0.000014600501,0.0000015926146,0.0054225703,0.0000011801276,0.000050213002,0.9744041,0.0035704337,0.013908217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034464192,0.000026294822,0.00071595464,0.008533695,0.00023084306,0.0000033931915,0.0047079697,0.000021508522,0.000067556626,0.007984042,0.9775404,0.00013390128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06836926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060744014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97396994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008231236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039134765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.956395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404694558","doi":"10.1163/9789004322714_cclc_2023-0021-0156","title":"Public Interest Groups at Supreme Court of Canada to Defend Federal Environmental Law from Alberta Challenge","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Climate Change and Law Collection","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Public interest; Environmental law; Federal court","score_opus":0.07391896990976994,"score_gpt":0.2655424566525352,"score_spread":0.19162348674276525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404694558","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008273578,0.0023942245,1.1539826e-7,0.004538449,0.002559341,0.0007600259,0.95817304,0.000025186973,0.023276048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64282995,0.0044336463,0.0000013369493,0.0008975425,0.002358868,0.00019509117,0.348089,0.000036304667,0.0011582281],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835926,0.00010515479,0.00030109668,0.00043939103,0.00036717084,0.00042791033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993147,0.00010389563,0.00014771636,0.00016244,0.000031884938,0.00023935999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020254104,0.00023551102,0.00038814484,0.00006806151,0.0012533187,0.00022415153,0.00018706144,0.00028370542,0.0006765681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002512427,0.00023177988,0.00006084301,0.00018630992,0.00017764713,0.00021822182,0.00024211906,0.00019091254,0.00007421446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032942997,0.000052603886,0.00004072445,0.00024268073,0.000056647517,0.000013670888,0.0025214653,2.8229366e-8,0.000011421593,0.0052857855,0.9916968,0.000045258636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013427722,0.000117849646,0.000023571441,0.00020045007,0.000051940784,0.000002154084,0.0014387636,0.0000018716422,0.000014316135,0.00033287954,0.9974383,0.00024361281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97978854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99976647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6345564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073655247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013725279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9639641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404694703","doi":"10.1163/9789004322714_cclc_2023-0027-0210","title":"Public Interest Groups at Supreme Court of Canada to Defend Federal Environmental Law from Alberta Challenge","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Climate Change and Law Collection","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Public interest; Environmental law","score_opus":0.07391896990976994,"score_gpt":0.2655424566525352,"score_spread":0.19162348674276525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404694703","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008273578,0.0023942245,1.1539826e-7,0.004538449,0.002559341,0.0007600259,0.95817304,0.000025186973,0.023276048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64282995,0.0044336463,0.0000013369493,0.0008975425,0.002358868,0.00019509117,0.348089,0.000036304667,0.0011582281],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835926,0.00010515479,0.00030109668,0.00043939103,0.00036717084,0.00042791033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993147,0.00010389563,0.00014771636,0.00016244,0.000031884938,0.00023935999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020254104,0.00023551102,0.00038814484,0.00006806151,0.0012533187,0.00022415153,0.00018706144,0.00028370542,0.0006765681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002512427,0.00023177988,0.00006084301,0.00018630992,0.00017764713,0.00021822182,0.00024211906,0.00019091254,0.00007421446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032942997,0.000052603886,0.00004072445,0.00024268073,0.000056647517,0.000013670888,0.0025214653,2.8229366e-8,0.000011421593,0.0052857855,0.9916968,0.000045258636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013427722,0.000117849646,0.000023571441,0.00020045007,0.000051940784,0.000002154084,0.0014387636,0.0000018716422,0.000014316135,0.00033287954,0.9974383,0.00024361281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97978854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99976647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6345564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073655247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013725279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9639641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404737995","doi":"10.22215/cjcr.v11i1.5060","title":"Indian Residential Schools and s. 43 of the Criminal Code (Canada’s corporal punishment law, TRC Call to Action #6)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Children s Rights / Revue canadienne des droits des enfants","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporal punishment; Law; Criminal code; Punishment (psychology); Political science; Criminology; Action (physics); Criminal law; Sociology; Psychology; Physics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01735756233517956,"score_gpt":0.2551598936934323,"score_spread":0.2378023313582527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404737995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925213,0.0010451088,0.000012618165,0.0013830841,0.0015335004,0.0003371059,0.00024711757,0.000008440572,0.002911717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99800766,0.00004103506,0.000059206177,0.00018957122,0.00081469456,0.0000031598966,0.0000039883057,0.000023012375,0.0008576649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788487,0.00018814423,0.00059646624,0.00026946756,0.00032609067,0.00073498685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970931,0.00006043608,0.00028277023,0.00018976122,0.00047605947,0.0018979091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007326735,0.00020436346,0.0003869658,0.0003105876,0.0011791326,0.00036569455,0.00058318896,0.0001361615,0.000066196946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028433258,0.00016149446,0.00010784878,0.0006427053,0.0006495452,0.00054978207,0.000025243855,0.00041026637,0.0000023706216],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031576314,0.00010171051,0.15262689,0.0017905262,0.0017941641,0.0056044725,0.31162548,0.0003582541,0.0008095442,0.4037488,0.051296007,0.0699284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016555501,0.0009872481,0.41512164,0.009480947,0.0010239518,0.0041730744,0.011182448,0.000027484364,0.0039583626,0.08256664,0.46789292,0.0019297396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9933267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41659692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017634294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006658321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404991610","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5034921","title":"Race, Unconscionability, and Contractual Equality&lt;br&gt;","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Race (biology); Sociology; Law and economics; Gender studies","score_opus":0.012699163827818917,"score_gpt":0.30607450956005083,"score_spread":0.2933753457322319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404991610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7301697,0.12454286,0.0048758425,0.03668892,0.0030620142,0.00064577855,0.00001424481,0.00039081354,0.09960979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986601,0.0060692425,0.0000093874,0.00012160919,0.0016201711,0.000004642412,8.3668755e-7,0.000014149763,0.005558937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702704,0.00028567985,0.00031198148,0.00024356242,0.00049260486,0.0016391528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999246,0.00028985512,0.000077316006,0.0000793837,0.00013399862,0.00017345608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063333083,0.00012535312,0.00021136706,0.000087108856,0.0007897392,0.0005213009,0.00020498292,0.0001258644,0.00010549642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004583084,0.000103835904,0.000091085734,0.0003027394,0.0002856691,0.0005776877,0.00003522716,0.0011794935,0.000050857758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014904587,0.000023085939,0.0007772967,0.000022127379,0.00007430206,0.000005955636,0.0033816628,9.574879e-7,0.000131804,0.969586,0.0005433278,0.025438553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019289182,0.000111033114,0.00020463554,0.000052928055,0.00003214549,0.00010049896,0.0066487407,0.000017645532,0.000009872333,0.6293039,0.36316374,0.0001619996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003164044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040718533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3626204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074271584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00602176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405617616","doi":"10.1017/ilr.2023.46","title":"United Mexican States <i>v</i>. Burr and Others","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Reports","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.014080882060206528,"score_gpt":0.3132602105635948,"score_spread":0.2991793285033883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405617616","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.100424536,0.0010451343,0.00013438298,0.008862405,0.0026204954,0.00012560927,0.000013438437,0.00022224394,0.88655174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920033,0.00009345834,0.000021115397,0.0004718744,0.0005031635,0.0000073882466,0.000013923722,0.000007964655,0.006877808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919236,0.000025073417,0.00017604558,0.0001706331,0.0003272466,0.00010864065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996647,0.00006737359,0.000049175243,0.000050390616,0.000101584825,0.00006672343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038293155,0.000053817443,0.0000644283,0.000057105164,0.00015191332,0.0003010505,0.0000642264,0.000037739133,0.00020775922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000076799246,0.00004687335,0.000026133406,0.00014374038,0.00016802753,0.00024313276,0.00002136666,0.000060052174,0.000011517306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025928916,0.000009645584,0.0010912167,0.000013044677,0.00004440539,0.00032667918,0.0030103468,0.000007893652,0.000061243234,0.9914641,0.0025321573,0.0014367255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018228478,0.0000069103094,0.00009308117,0.00005712592,0.000005296667,0.000029934596,0.0004301013,0.000058989554,0.00008323677,0.04223539,0.95691836,0.000063368105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05856876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004927617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9543862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050447634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008208726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9477003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405717084","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4998522","title":"The Charter in Administrative Decision-Making: Defending the Duty to Take Charter Values (or Purposes) Into Account","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Duty; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.028403399140806966,"score_gpt":0.37341505116271884,"score_spread":0.34501165202191186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405717084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71878517,0.06776008,0.0044263694,0.13027462,0.020383013,0.006560965,0.00005526479,0.00034991678,0.0514046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98861146,0.0048176562,0.00003119684,0.00039053924,0.0037905031,0.00014600529,0.0000010527118,0.000046509438,0.0021650968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942216,0.0005425947,0.0008325874,0.0005796052,0.0012051623,0.0026184372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780583,0.0009538624,0.00043132197,0.00037536715,0.00027108038,0.00016252513],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009519529,0.00039409808,0.0004623579,0.00020992753,0.0022570915,0.0021969983,0.0017246457,0.00033503145,0.00008126239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013035077,0.00020492409,0.00029331414,0.000637685,0.00026719976,0.00023447332,0.0005859349,0.0055575976,0.00015169046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067192485,0.00012545736,0.0007071713,0.00010563968,0.0007128541,0.00011014761,0.14468911,0.00009240428,0.00003233773,0.60528255,0.0049764668,0.24249394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012389699,0.00018704463,0.00021417017,0.00093801646,0.00005871277,0.00005884839,0.055823687,0.000031281037,0.0000068322497,0.8617624,0.080461755,0.00033336002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002956731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22452255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26982626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028351631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0125514725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99904186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406150484","doi":"10.53555/sfs.v10i3.3276","title":"Prolonged Delay in Justice to The Victims of Rape Cases","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Criminology; Psychology; Medical emergency; Political science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.24771534764707248,"score_gpt":0.35563111347830295,"score_spread":0.10791576583123047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406150484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98824716,0.00023956892,0.000006435146,0.0062441193,0.0009428654,0.00015894984,0.0000066610514,0.000007692887,0.0041465657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999296,0.00019419189,0.000045985726,0.0001503934,0.00017942925,0.000004369998,2.404435e-7,0.0000033636563,0.0001260167],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975512,0.0007204278,0.0005483379,0.00012080007,0.0007595877,0.00029961666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99774617,0.001492639,0.0003157616,0.000068678964,0.0003046474,0.00007211302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01395719,0.00007147433,0.00025434047,0.0002772378,0.0003458347,0.00013073863,0.00066475477,0.0000528275,0.00003688511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005899124,0.00004527079,0.000037359623,0.0038727461,0.0005863222,0.0005955444,0.000055231932,0.00015867043,0.0000068464165],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009464813,0.000044553537,0.95592284,0.000029394801,0.0000065908935,0.00006324907,0.033583254,0.00086621044,0.000070047,0.0003167662,0.007381147,0.0016212703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023054752,0.00048099647,0.9213256,0.00016918637,0.000010440991,0.000015287334,0.04222378,0.00002516298,0.000093903625,0.00058483484,0.0346954,0.00014481976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04568012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30014482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2544647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049440685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063879724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96067476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406390357","doi":"10.1016/s1553-3212(10)70191-6","title":"10.1016/s1553-3212(10)70191-6","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Electronic records; Internet privacy; Computer science; Computer security; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.00873362985547804,"score_gpt":0.21634067593288225,"score_spread":0.2076070460774042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406390357","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038402525,0.00014604187,4.3459357e-7,0.0011262713,0.0000055079586,0.00021900597,0.000007689006,0.00017572402,0.9979353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0043182266,9.155759e-7,0.000017756782,0.000072057686,0.00089443167,0.000017793292,0.0000033634656,0.000016030848,0.9946594],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871373,0.00009202076,0.00019049711,0.0002307866,0.00038516268,0.00038778532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994115,0.000061006464,0.00004054793,0.00016161031,0.00009278226,0.00023253205],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041258786,0.00011312472,0.0001849925,0.000046989637,0.00045921127,0.00014511248,0.00031621763,0.000100602796,0.99788666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001405312,0.000107815315,0.00006092887,0.00041772693,0.000098822944,0.0002319656,0.000026818137,0.00008627692,0.99580586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035575362,0.000039492203,3.0259747e-7,0.000007885167,0.000011029575,0.0000045031343,0.0006983054,0.000009718319,0.000010791695,0.000052920394,0.68875164,0.31037787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009936255,0.00006470192,0.000012815088,0.000021639995,0.000008671651,6.294673e-7,0.000028242834,0.0000056411354,0.000017275339,0.000082957726,0.9994927,0.00016537312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006003078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006134477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31074107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006363648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014601903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9074899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406433712","doi":"10.1016/s0029-7437(08)70197-6","title":"10.1016/s0029-7437(08)70197-6","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Business; Actuarial science; Computer security; Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.010065520683514932,"score_gpt":0.2232027286929123,"score_spread":0.21313720800939737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406433712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036671007,0.00014709494,5.9834855e-7,0.0011093853,0.000001136584,0.00021963376,0.0000069541506,0.00020125876,0.9979472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00469148,0.0000010316127,0.00002187974,0.00007546326,0.00086408225,0.000016808252,0.0000025450568,0.0000150429705,0.9943117],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877566,0.00008572627,0.00018067335,0.00021921257,0.00036555436,0.00037317842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994485,0.000056481487,0.000036500864,0.00015316374,0.00007973966,0.00022564168],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003936125,0.00010640026,0.00017430211,0.000045081044,0.00043748762,0.00013448668,0.0003011461,0.00009406683,0.9972548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001179221,0.00010169665,0.000056657846,0.0004063611,0.00009209935,0.0002241685,0.000024656023,0.0000894192,0.99518627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020145535,0.000029181016,3.9872313e-7,0.000005723974,0.000008116324,0.0000026062833,0.0005739641,0.000007445093,0.000008402641,0.000053138843,0.8550205,0.14427036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009518971,0.000056609595,0.000013610182,0.000021585503,0.0000080199225,6.834956e-7,0.000027716113,0.0000052975684,0.000016303587,0.00009689996,0.99950117,0.00015688814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005609813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000055849672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14448068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059212394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001303057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8480396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406441747","doi":"10.1016/s0029-7437(05)70994-0","title":"10.1016/s0029-7437(05)70994-0","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Ophthalmology","score_opus":0.010083205922202836,"score_gpt":0.22343028214758626,"score_spread":0.21334707622538343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406441747","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003570003,0.00012914624,6.2052817e-7,0.0012470977,0.0000012855096,0.00021687662,0.00000701925,0.00020237788,0.99783856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004409645,9.725684e-7,0.00002255483,0.00008987539,0.0008686033,0.00001734321,0.0000025923641,0.00001515068,0.99457324],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987714,0.0000877664,0.00018234881,0.00021876377,0.00036215805,0.00037754793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943507,0.000068330795,0.000036950252,0.00015293086,0.00007591711,0.00023080777],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004047642,0.00010663728,0.00017583773,0.000044934422,0.00044178616,0.00013197526,0.00030053503,0.00009375922,0.9967206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001472804,0.000101610414,0.000057797155,0.00040158254,0.00009236375,0.0002240682,0.000024598607,0.00008878909,0.9936412],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018708053,0.000028019076,2.774073e-7,0.000005279666,0.0000075220887,0.0000030604335,0.000588957,0.000006893712,0.0000068006875,0.000053003354,0.8463043,0.1529772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009261818,0.00006146291,0.0000102076365,0.000021314903,0.000008101064,8.7183537e-7,0.00003424216,0.000005573955,0.000015408623,0.00010276051,0.9994915,0.00015594765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006486502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006067433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1531872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060731938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012745227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9805694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406455807","doi":"10.1016/s0029-7437(09)70466-5","title":"10.1016/s0029-7437(09)70466-5","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"FLAGS register; Enforcement; Business; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.010046891217057163,"score_gpt":0.22316706769660413,"score_spread":0.21312017647954698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406455807","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033994872,0.00014375539,6.246175e-7,0.0011089982,0.0000011300882,0.000218998,0.0000070340566,0.0002024285,0.9979771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0035087857,0.0000010373349,0.000021948514,0.000059414793,0.00087834854,0.000017465007,0.0000024699434,0.0000151981785,0.9954953],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987727,0.000086064625,0.00018101606,0.00021921626,0.00036702887,0.00037401114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994457,0.000055998524,0.000036557947,0.00015373588,0.00007965237,0.00022838343],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039658113,0.0001065484,0.0001739863,0.000044954144,0.00044359485,0.0001347528,0.00030204895,0.000094129624,0.9967912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001182897,0.000101778984,0.00005729205,0.00040137532,0.00009325383,0.00022368252,0.000024652854,0.00008956456,0.9943937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020559253,0.000029229863,4.3094923e-7,0.0000056039016,0.000008062681,0.0000026306118,0.00056760624,0.000006973225,0.0000081042845,0.000053413576,0.7912322,0.20806514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093591734,0.000056102366,0.000013785096,0.000021272444,0.000008120743,6.914654e-7,0.000027971137,0.000005153684,0.000016366326,0.00009657358,0.9995035,0.00015687635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064761126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006288186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20827125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060616792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000129625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97899884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406473205","doi":"10.1016/s1541-9800(11)70674-3","title":"10.1016/s1541-9800(11)70674-3","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Atlanta; Law; Mandate; Political science; Public administration; Geography; Archaeology; Metropolitan area","score_opus":0.008300268137937121,"score_gpt":0.21523492958806126,"score_spread":0.20693466145012412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406473205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00059430994,0.00012573208,5.1078615e-7,0.0013564527,0.000005932882,0.00021818298,0.000006927274,0.00017303234,0.9975189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0062191947,8.7385604e-7,0.000021364549,0.00008083475,0.00087262614,0.000017628152,0.000002592301,0.000015158856,0.9927697],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987699,0.000089311536,0.00018103325,0.00021915027,0.0003701782,0.0003704609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994439,0.00006047161,0.000036445945,0.00015545698,0.00007890508,0.0002248368],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004072195,0.00010615407,0.00017312939,0.000044946053,0.00044287601,0.00013371033,0.00030782932,0.00009453323,0.99641293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012233111,0.00010141212,0.000056790974,0.00039711787,0.00009638427,0.00021795406,0.000025189007,0.00007691634,0.9914734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024962566,0.00004304511,0.0000011776469,0.00000870592,0.00000964379,0.0000051277616,0.00084557006,0.000011571476,0.000010676709,0.00009424353,0.6138403,0.385105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098967,0.000044153618,0.000017307517,0.000021252474,0.0000080454965,6.7600047e-7,0.000028757753,0.000005064291,0.00001660728,0.0000946089,0.9995083,0.0001562539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009252168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013402263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38566804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060533213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013064145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406479632","doi":"10.1016/s0029-7437(05)70483-3","title":"10.1016/s0029-7437(05)70483-3","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort reform; Tort; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Law; Liability","score_opus":0.010079898730987453,"score_gpt":0.22343582159628342,"score_spread":0.21335592286529598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406479632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032794254,0.0001301433,6.5684486e-7,0.0012995752,0.0000012942633,0.00021675696,0.0000068234513,0.000202405,0.9978144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004428439,9.94408e-7,0.000022496371,0.00008943296,0.00086993526,0.000017400616,0.0000025743936,0.000015160569,0.99455357],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987686,0.00008910372,0.00018244215,0.00021896132,0.00036319063,0.00037769065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944025,0.0000592924,0.000036877973,0.00015294463,0.0000796311,0.00023099779],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041065217,0.00010713837,0.00017639437,0.000045080997,0.0004418732,0.00013455626,0.00030127267,0.00009481403,0.9966392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012591008,0.00010162342,0.000058118105,0.00040273368,0.00009282564,0.00022992086,0.000024184472,0.00009059275,0.9930367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018680854,0.000027832297,3.1615403e-7,0.0000051725583,0.0000074428185,0.000003058626,0.0005121458,0.0000066318894,0.0000066747466,0.0000593796,0.8509301,0.14842255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092876144,0.00006159865,0.000012290747,0.00002114465,0.000008086619,8.7029485e-7,0.000029695373,0.0000055508162,0.000014473146,0.0001121646,0.9994853,0.00015596478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007173092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000066639375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14855517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000061650484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013285904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406486371","doi":"10.1016/s0029-7437(07)70390-7","title":"10.1016/s0029-7437(07)70390-7","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty to warn; Genetic testing; Computer science; Psychology; Computer security; Genetics; Biology; Confidentiality","score_opus":0.01012918362288393,"score_gpt":0.22367713164695321,"score_spread":0.2135479480240693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406486371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036401436,0.00016464731,5.6991985e-7,0.0011272436,0.0000011136276,0.00021634296,0.000006835768,0.0002020031,0.99791723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0041186754,0.0000011227805,0.000022454491,0.00007381781,0.00087372225,0.000017285232,0.0000024300557,0.000015111178,0.9948754],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877703,0.000086087355,0.00018084074,0.00021892767,0.00036450813,0.00037261576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994487,0.00005551856,0.00003650604,0.00015247737,0.000079149846,0.00022764884],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039792055,0.00010646596,0.00017412887,0.000041642616,0.00044140712,0.00013352693,0.00030029297,0.000093830364,0.99777234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012024354,0.00010153207,0.00005742342,0.00036191757,0.000092698196,0.0002191701,0.000024560972,0.00008963609,0.99619734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020540487,0.000030111398,4.042518e-7,0.000006451733,0.000008262038,0.0000028875297,0.0005393034,0.000007655906,0.0000071722548,0.000054376815,0.8447636,0.15455927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090425434,0.000055501343,0.000013886944,0.000023780296,0.000008105427,7.171419e-7,0.000026532154,0.0000052102423,0.000014965099,0.00010211138,0.99950254,0.00015622067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006253785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049467857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15473898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005973814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001281778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94538945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406546955","doi":"10.1016/s1541-9800(07)70348-4","title":"10.1016/s1541-9800(07)70348-4","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Smoking prevention; Environmental health; Medicine; Business; Smoking cessation; Pathology","score_opus":0.008640582436949599,"score_gpt":0.2168628159482728,"score_spread":0.2082222335113232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406546955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004087951,0.00015607012,5.140432e-7,0.0012283215,0.000005589169,0.00022036712,0.00000716325,0.00017611675,0.9977971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0056103417,0.0000010910491,0.00002001661,0.0000858812,0.00086837145,0.000017608885,0.0000026670532,0.000015407231,0.99337864],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987517,0.00008916234,0.00018349945,0.00022196028,0.00037361385,0.00038005106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994368,0.000057393292,0.00003696481,0.00015523942,0.000081572194,0.00023202838],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004036301,0.00010802762,0.00017674836,0.000043448443,0.0004479404,0.00013612915,0.00030516126,0.000095309115,0.99743867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012297717,0.00010319152,0.000058162244,0.0003685709,0.00009371518,0.0002310587,0.00002503732,0.000090495094,0.99607474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002990745,0.00004204493,5.780984e-7,0.0000081287235,0.00001156222,0.0000054179905,0.0008123307,0.000010096072,0.000011530651,0.00007356166,0.54111844,0.4578764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009418434,0.000055765984,0.000014876503,0.000021687238,0.000008260947,7.3247895e-7,0.000027629927,0.0000048629227,0.000016483893,0.00011130392,0.9994853,0.00015891455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067200135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053788932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45836687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000061305785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013695241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406575498","doi":"10.1016/s1553-3212(12)70056-0","title":"10.1016/s1553-3212(12)70056-0","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Business; Law and economics; Accounting; Economics","score_opus":0.009025969131172158,"score_gpt":0.2132866686552698,"score_spread":0.20426069952409764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406575498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038776913,0.00012028878,5.454356e-7,0.001208892,0.0000054887764,0.0002185966,0.0000066801153,0.0001722657,0.99787945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005093822,0.0000010180491,0.000016379021,0.0000883568,0.000876145,0.000017045772,0.0000027967603,0.000014747685,0.9938897],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998781,0.00008764301,0.00018002008,0.00021535388,0.00036094835,0.00037499212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994535,0.000055815748,0.000036709105,0.00015140879,0.00006951345,0.00023309715],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039306888,0.000105867155,0.00017276581,0.00004450597,0.00043335414,0.00013251377,0.00029952623,0.00009342087,0.99591184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012309336,0.00010111029,0.000056126242,0.00031294685,0.00009324288,0.00023202648,0.000024159946,0.000089415684,0.99157494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003166646,0.000038367358,6.240474e-7,0.000007924864,0.000011290329,0.0000049968985,0.00085170066,0.000010877029,0.000010249553,0.00007252012,0.55082464,0.44813514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009188986,0.00005586415,0.000016207696,0.000020791456,0.000007847992,6.722577e-7,0.000026746955,0.0000050743756,0.000015782149,0.000088032444,0.9995153,0.00015578639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057420344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008613978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44869065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000615241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013025962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8680277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406577230","doi":"10.1016/s1544-8800(09)70282-9","title":"10.1016/s1544-8800(09)70282-9","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.008589942541879891,"score_gpt":0.2163326638049174,"score_spread":0.2077427212630375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406577230","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005592641,0.00013967609,5.5256e-7,0.0012087474,0.000005539261,0.00021939288,0.0000067806004,0.00017344725,0.9976866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005264833,7.921712e-7,0.000019225467,0.000055682394,0.00084923237,0.000017188973,0.00000246443,0.000015164633,0.9937754],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987714,0.00008719709,0.00018085587,0.00021835596,0.0003682242,0.0003739631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994467,0.000056320117,0.000036484573,0.00015226149,0.000080317004,0.00022795187],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003817998,0.000106542146,0.0001744996,0.000044630353,0.0005606909,0.00018785804,0.00030032927,0.000094129624,0.99587506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000113652495,0.00010173523,0.000057391364,0.00040214267,0.00012031265,0.00022308089,0.000024573224,0.00008929896,0.9930592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002836934,0.000037311253,6.6058726e-7,0.000007284951,0.000010226087,0.0000045608203,0.0008808065,0.0000075878934,0.000011527484,0.000053423926,0.37071553,0.62824273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009219714,0.000055750097,0.000020331088,0.000021195445,0.000008117185,6.783783e-7,0.000027987133,0.0000060697384,0.000016653199,0.00009012313,0.9995042,0.00015666957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009990931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000092513896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6287887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060101233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017152136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99660164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407746090","doi":"10.5771/9780739146576","title":"Same-Sex Marriage in the Americas","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Lexington Books","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.0278914142674676,"score_gpt":0.30948495836989265,"score_spread":0.28159354410242504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407746090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022229002,0.0004790512,0.0000102956465,0.0015447118,0.0008571388,0.0005634307,0.00001063719,0.00009308556,0.99621934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02485522,0.00009450803,0.000033061144,0.0023343454,0.0038221793,0.000048338636,0.000011940205,0.000044322896,0.9687561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772215,0.00022902293,0.0003819618,0.00038411425,0.0007960444,0.00048672492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987967,0.0003435484,0.00030234148,0.00039328693,0.000066089895,0.00009804146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013922947,0.0002604794,0.0004405449,0.000116639094,0.00053267775,0.0003132832,0.0009460492,0.0006293653,0.00038291293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002332618,0.00019723712,0.00015337225,0.00013181477,0.0005986867,0.00012652372,0.00007117265,0.0013215145,0.00025719395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021938271,0.00006869453,0.00027660813,0.00017952183,0.000048239515,0.00017577506,0.08891741,9.821235e-7,0.000053517935,0.5832545,0.29368547,0.03331732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008908821,0.00002681637,0.000036169302,0.00011659845,0.000014786737,0.0000015538928,0.001281144,5.8647856e-7,0.0000070823744,0.051900186,0.94627297,0.00025302643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02971684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039010316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6525875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019241661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010971412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9785252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407798530","doi":"10.53555/sfs.v10i1.3380","title":"Attaining Access to Justice Through Legal Aid Mechanism: Leaving No One Behind in Modern Era","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Economic Justice; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Engineering ethics; Criminology; Sociology; Epistemology; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.32213211815145576,"score_gpt":0.38196167480978827,"score_spread":0.059829556658332506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407798530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96907943,0.00012138879,0.00040118064,0.0054571377,0.0019973342,0.00019475794,0.000008309433,0.000031200852,0.02270923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977556,0.00021535801,0.0006187281,0.0004234992,0.00058581994,0.0000058902338,6.965448e-7,0.00001074842,0.00038366648],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963705,0.0006307815,0.00077174563,0.00029175798,0.0012917395,0.0006434616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981087,0.000831669,0.00040034542,0.00009264103,0.00041770164,0.0001489529],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012255053,0.00014498024,0.00044586472,0.00039590802,0.0007438288,0.0010991435,0.00119439,0.00011065844,0.000073257885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045804353,0.00013072383,0.000058486654,0.0029025837,0.0003907702,0.0046293545,0.00020148414,0.00038996895,0.000016297126],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023370751,0.00016760168,0.87501407,0.00013380527,0.000025990834,0.00021037446,0.10230739,0.0043692626,0.00058436545,0.005277448,0.005756753,0.005919256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018167251,0.0015898137,0.79589266,0.0023167727,0.000058340782,0.000028224957,0.10665172,0.001032996,0.0007273433,0.05218734,0.03614492,0.0015531667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070770085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15906012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08829003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018285707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010324192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408074171","doi":"10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.4381","title":"THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES (PREVENTION) ACT, 1967: A CRITICAL STUDY","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ShodhKosh Journal of Visual and Performing Arts","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Law; Psychology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03903233247455417,"score_gpt":0.4126015211518782,"score_spread":0.373569188677324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408074171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847153,0.0022375288,0.000068975954,0.005408846,0.00085927855,0.00015667663,0.000002139904,0.000009859572,0.0065413928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985179,0.00019933045,0.000010638564,0.000027909346,0.0006267273,0.000004479202,5.9816884e-8,0.0000052669443,0.0006076922],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892,0.00016511224,0.00032411813,0.00007955118,0.00035024926,0.00016095722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899316,0.00060578284,0.00011646853,0.000065005705,0.00015328517,0.000066324734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016140543,0.00006712284,0.00014004573,0.0000419258,0.0012593028,0.0002452258,0.0001833849,0.000035486508,0.000023219394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036002966,0.00003468364,0.000100694975,0.00021469401,0.0003445673,0.0003947152,0.000046854955,0.00021092534,0.0000011695345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017676456,0.001237418,0.090009905,0.00045976727,0.00053432526,0.00002564417,0.15600786,0.000014592217,0.0016955668,0.34444502,0.0046679066,0.40072522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082193624,0.0032061443,0.08990639,0.0026682965,0.0006710087,0.00033262736,0.24536645,0.00020536808,0.0018941335,0.0978559,0.556469,0.00060272665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027236756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007662412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5518011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029212013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003816756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96856666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408098665","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1455","title":"R. v. J.J., Judicial Discretion and the Charter","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Judicial discretion; Discretion; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology","score_opus":0.02106667931831491,"score_gpt":0.3169317766388853,"score_spread":0.29586509732057037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408098665","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018806651,0.68576777,0.00026413798,0.08746674,0.0010224668,0.00094575086,0.000007503853,0.00014621158,0.22419137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8520702,0.14172362,0.0000072539656,0.0035732922,0.0011812964,0.000061726685,0.0000026933387,0.000011181333,0.001368721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998882,0.00024289043,0.00020679587,0.00017728741,0.00030871865,0.00018234143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996169,0.00011628731,0.00003579582,0.000109607194,0.00005928742,0.000062100335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017646678,0.000084795494,0.00023118689,0.000010455572,0.0004671771,0.00022112041,0.00013937739,0.000045966684,0.00041343138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000104832405,0.000048635615,0.000086869695,0.00020562876,0.00053784135,0.0002616045,0.000023302642,0.00012208737,0.00015635436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003621273,0.000003566812,0.0000054109187,0.0009614132,0.00001548875,0.0000028075394,0.0011796812,1.7164124e-8,0.0000026753653,0.97237486,0.011568427,0.013882012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007768006,0.000007556062,0.000009243928,0.0026413475,0.0000712213,0.0000022678103,0.00007367567,0.000009293055,0.0000020182504,0.013452196,0.98357785,0.00007567697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008057244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003360723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9720094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024510384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000086601736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408152624","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v33i1.2212","title":"Legal Relationship between Universities and their Students – How Accountable and to what Extent in Law are Universities Liable for Student Suicides?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.035682557447261676,"score_gpt":0.3381746291294324,"score_spread":0.30249207168217074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408152624","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98546267,0.00199392,0.00027610388,0.006153024,0.00026125516,0.00028406183,0.000005791513,0.000016085158,0.005547096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960821,0.00011532201,0.000029486215,0.00036787477,0.00019617999,0.0000034539376,5.737306e-7,0.000005661713,0.003199336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990469,0.00016009326,0.00013731424,0.0001322526,0.00025577255,0.00026762296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905056,0.00056083023,0.00010618615,0.000068459296,0.0001284394,0.00008550117],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014161145,0.000099200195,0.00019915294,0.000092833034,0.0026795035,0.0019147496,0.00031862909,0.000060734346,0.0000030629963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030863936,0.00007546336,0.00003251587,0.00021660519,0.00028412807,0.001560533,0.00014374341,0.00020336443,5.4581085e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006045562,0.000024989107,0.25246552,0.000049104354,0.0000814278,0.000010662386,0.053563002,0.00009506098,0.000009255447,0.6929043,0.00047883802,0.0002574113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056934904,0.000055739958,0.06003446,0.0006906424,0.000052072108,0.0000036610543,0.86229277,0.0000036739432,0.000030093282,0.0085997265,0.067535006,0.00013282173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01863668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032663357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80872977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031484745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015083519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99912137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408290791","doi":"10.37419/lr.v12.i2.7","title":"The Excessive Fines Clause in the Federal Courts: A Quarter-Century of Narrowing","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Law; Business; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.016926483652978382,"score_gpt":0.3373497357116555,"score_spread":0.3204232520586771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408290791","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011383275,0.6548363,0.000012212971,0.051785048,0.00072481134,0.001606387,0.000004891752,0.000045556855,0.2796015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94258535,0.052969687,0.0000048975917,0.0038617817,0.00015453315,0.000045537046,9.679668e-7,0.0000042107463,0.00037303675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983315,0.0005486553,0.00042003667,0.00014277296,0.00031932723,0.00023774545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901074,0.0004627707,0.00017634548,0.0002137305,0.00011080759,0.000025596346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020351235,0.0000976142,0.00030390444,0.00001582356,0.0006485293,0.00013320161,0.0005191987,0.000050917366,0.00003333338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039151593,0.000050738774,0.00010088497,0.00047561777,0.00027871947,0.00016636903,0.000034337656,0.00014492632,0.00001369104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007023488,0.00005755928,0.0012886414,0.0016830737,0.000026164165,0.0000065386103,0.003813383,3.7844663e-7,0.0000046913547,0.9610324,0.02170672,0.010373462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000982956,0.000015391992,0.00045139698,0.004337305,0.000025401685,5.3365574e-7,0.0015757,8.2977726e-7,0.000003731804,0.0054988936,0.98792243,0.000070113994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015617616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018899526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96621567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036114045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019418479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408877377","doi":"10.63485/xtdzb-f4n83","title":"Central v. distributed OA archiving in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.020505662432438447,"score_gpt":0.2830930256271493,"score_spread":0.2625873631947108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408877377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3308742,0.0008098154,0.0058557163,0.006219758,0.005388004,0.001080848,0.00023496828,0.00017022523,0.64936644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998423,0.000056820045,0.00005138746,0.00022918954,0.0006462498,0.000007985188,0.00003581387,0.000008370848,0.0005412257],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980832,0.00010509739,0.0003345914,0.0002893206,0.00052325247,0.0006645876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993539,0.0001285533,0.00011583402,0.00013489628,0.00005821129,0.00020863919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052657083,0.00013728587,0.0002694841,0.00005589202,0.00017037343,0.000106460946,0.0004029276,0.00014270094,0.00020985412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024487672,0.00013288792,0.00004692048,0.00022620696,0.00006618573,0.000058765978,0.00021354947,0.0004841419,0.0000032683133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005709865,0.00019217735,0.7360059,0.0009519114,0.0001334398,0.0009208857,0.03171785,0.00499896,0.00001674742,0.12022582,0.059909772,0.044869415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040372816,0.000012766371,0.2559534,0.00085382484,0.000026178746,0.0000016754002,0.02124058,0.00053684774,0.0000907386,0.020087762,0.69937617,0.0014163383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6675488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018501334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008749005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99687046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409907621","doi":"10.1017/cls.2024.21","title":"A School for Self-Represented Litigants: A People-Centred Approach to Access to Justice in Family Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Irvine; University of Windsor","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Family law; Law; Criminology; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.03103329439725823,"score_gpt":0.3047306412052184,"score_spread":0.2736973468079602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409907621","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.692565,0.005975312,0.0014418917,0.03836854,0.0048118676,0.0037186637,0.00056553603,0.00011840686,0.25243473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98730046,0.00012785963,0.0005965364,0.009931121,0.001133753,0.000064044274,0.000006196948,0.000037736303,0.00080230983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779177,0.00012092593,0.0005391325,0.0003920286,0.00018675055,0.0009694007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961032,0.00030251688,0.00011920097,0.00014708785,0.0004683752,0.0028595778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013626802,0.00020214377,0.0005104293,0.0001496631,0.0007759694,0.0009739347,0.00054916105,0.00022404411,0.000021854084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055928645,0.00021942938,0.0002576494,0.0008806947,0.00015112683,0.0007940237,0.000035611505,0.00040863059,0.0000036889733],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016287524,0.000031324333,0.00022068653,0.00064799277,0.00015817009,0.00007013862,0.21315967,0.000086521584,0.00002841145,0.76911527,0.016062709,0.00040285813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010316703,0.00019738797,0.0009778535,0.0011191885,0.00028482018,0.000058389636,0.15958682,0.00038175168,0.000008381036,0.014974917,0.820709,0.0006698297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.623972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95070595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8046463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001566756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037585907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93916744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409970106","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5235704","title":"Collecting Conditions: A Snapshot of Supervised Release in 2023 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut&amp;nbsp;","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Columbia College","funders":"","keywords":"Snapshot (computer storage); School district; Lake district; Environmental science; Geography; Archaeology; Psychology; Computer science; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.024891622448299802,"score_gpt":0.3307014232711885,"score_spread":0.3058098008228887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409970106","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9583652,0.012166014,0.0024710656,0.012626404,0.00046599138,0.0016143047,0.000062108156,0.000012126059,0.012216778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969758,0.002360667,0.0000064855103,0.00008998613,0.00014024759,0.0000570694,0.000006871591,0.0000057645293,0.00035713287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766076,0.0003787168,0.0005625325,0.00013666961,0.0003416179,0.0009197241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972862,0.002052278,0.00029086065,0.00012917568,0.00021265123,0.000028862158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004985954,0.00010253392,0.0002741895,0.00016327074,0.0006398324,0.00006671689,0.00049980136,0.00008111431,0.000034364355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002710951,0.000066376386,0.0001328237,0.0017674117,0.0001910571,0.00013955594,0.000020688683,0.0007554358,6.460379e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004985347,0.00064944674,0.040651597,0.00020968753,0.000356267,0.000005234989,0.016651534,0.00034869442,0.0004742912,0.9238015,0.0060294773,0.010323766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0066980203,0.000764942,0.039797697,0.00091683125,0.00037344615,0.000049212704,0.34835425,0.0006399074,0.0002696527,0.5583988,0.043165244,0.00057202595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022617096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14761926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3654027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005640443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041931695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98389137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410597222","doi":"10.9741/2327-8455.1214","title":"Blackjack At Thirty Thousand Feet: America's Attempt To Enforce Its Ban On In-flight Gambling Extraterritorially","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine","score_opus":0.18855747931655534,"score_gpt":0.4732266562161891,"score_spread":0.2846691768996338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410597222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16257304,0.37820062,0.00017158524,0.044228375,0.010142327,0.0048565,0.000021324353,0.00018244861,0.39962378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9036413,0.07828556,0.00014661714,0.0012154558,0.011678319,0.000049777642,0.0000023757768,0.00004715717,0.0049334513],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928026,0.0019147025,0.0007998534,0.0003561478,0.002487402,0.0016392894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971029,0.0006915519,0.0002722187,0.00027120722,0.0006342152,0.0010279107],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015740093,0.00023493322,0.00059128524,0.00036790245,0.001679279,0.0004718487,0.0007824831,0.00014438237,0.00072352623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004104873,0.000181154,0.00014277047,0.0015398414,0.00019303084,0.0008147746,0.00019100914,0.0011778706,0.0009563465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006536776,0.0011566295,0.029944317,0.0064914576,0.00025055773,0.00060102507,0.09397086,0.00011483931,0.009872035,0.025100643,0.525222,0.30662194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021180505,0.0001753547,0.0007885981,0.0065183346,0.000011932887,0.000018543877,0.0009113581,0.0000036986835,0.0002386994,0.00008592658,0.99078953,0.0002462052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020508077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001235878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74106824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009690074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005958942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410814135","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-88455-9_2","title":"Legacy in Practice: A Family-Driven Path to Sustainability Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Bible College","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Path (computing); Sociology; Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Computer science; Philosophy; Ecology","score_opus":0.017128585902562977,"score_gpt":0.3328503572216762,"score_spread":0.3157217713191132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410814135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000025779505,0.00041006904,0.00008201488,0.009393266,0.0004015841,0.001237543,0.000009257727,0.000107746244,0.98833275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18096982,0.0001601957,0.00019658009,0.0037361828,0.00056173047,0.00004930387,0.000004950917,0.000022110173,0.8142991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978469,0.000121559526,0.00046034603,0.00053672574,0.000611288,0.00042319918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817777,0.0003850616,0.00016233347,0.00030606973,0.0007849796,0.0001837737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010485606,0.00024545126,0.00047957545,0.00014916746,0.0003583038,0.0004096223,0.00040534558,0.00046384387,0.00021748597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013475928,0.00023333509,0.000115791416,0.00018661223,0.00022569686,0.000843244,0.00017524413,0.0004284475,0.000109152315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023409988,0.000030735973,0.00002160351,0.00014139194,0.00001970437,0.00004380963,0.0034609432,0.0000019971171,4.5816026e-7,0.98431057,0.008649546,0.003295817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098707525,0.000041020678,0.000016762751,0.00022625964,0.000025631576,2.0932946e-7,0.00876472,8.1339914e-7,4.8606216e-7,0.077445775,0.9131243,0.0002552645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25044107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12409044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9068648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009439198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023790998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9515129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411373773","doi":"10.17323/1999-5431-2016-0-3-69-90","title":"The Stabilization of the Regulatory Burden: The \"One-In, One-Out\" Principle Implementation Challenges","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Issues","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Burden of proof; Precautionary principle; Political science; Law; Biology; Biotechnology","score_opus":0.08423281540410126,"score_gpt":0.3767610727661123,"score_spread":0.29252825736201105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411373773","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35105067,0.0047152257,0.00025006238,0.6108902,0.0009122767,0.0017968653,0.000018972016,0.00009710126,0.030268596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99712974,0.0010468629,0.000009141453,0.000047766935,0.00050908275,0.00007432215,0.0000020265657,0.0000071558948,0.0011739068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981618,0.00042543275,0.00038514906,0.00016356786,0.00064392743,0.00022011498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881506,0.00026304647,0.00031739677,0.00027928167,0.0002842609,0.000040969117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018638549,0.000076698765,0.000104699655,0.000026932164,0.0007814606,0.00016194752,0.0003947743,0.00006600544,0.00011188821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006581902,0.000036342484,0.000041852032,0.0002350873,0.00037507358,0.00048368608,0.000044352964,0.000054628657,0.00000702617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001147622,0.00004468817,0.0057581766,0.00002193636,0.000015879323,7.7120674e-8,0.018709037,3.8659064e-7,0.00042768093,0.94844216,0.00033847868,0.026230048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028487612,0.00008016396,0.048909415,0.00006590691,0.00001291648,2.498853e-7,0.043176334,0.0000033459883,0.004058774,0.019126099,0.8841531,0.00012876501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076211244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.078948215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92931604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000928018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005393162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9378586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412110468","doi":"10.1099/ijsem.0.006819","title":"Judicial Opinion 132","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Food and Agriculture; Ministerio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital, Gobierno de España; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Joint Genome Institute; Canadian Patient Safety Institute; Office of Science; U.S. Department of Agriculture; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Biology","score_opus":0.01683935603797627,"score_gpt":0.31787951172082934,"score_spread":0.3010401556828531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412110468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40539256,0.15832491,0.030598057,0.092365935,0.101740584,0.0033550635,0.00016211082,0.00020761199,0.20785318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972797,0.0006132688,0.000170463,0.00030289462,0.000884576,0.000004054508,0.0000030663266,0.0000028120496,0.00073916063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987535,0.00025276697,0.0006190791,0.00009052685,0.00015723694,0.00012689596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857616,0.00022291698,0.00040251395,0.000046639107,0.00070683623,0.0000449117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008868557,0.00007227078,0.0002991656,0.00022392564,0.00018919088,0.00004609563,0.00032222923,0.000107557644,0.000044542358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005432084,0.000057948415,0.000080299156,0.000117601,0.00021920203,0.00019366713,0.00004822991,0.000102407095,0.000012559799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042968724,0.00037604434,0.017690713,0.0070245694,0.0018315078,0.0000789635,0.010707204,0.000055635115,0.009364926,0.84727746,0.10384401,0.0013193032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005095337,0.00060947845,0.011258235,0.054663282,0.0004333791,0.0027818228,0.035093736,0.00011567428,0.00031197543,0.15038896,0.7382706,0.000977529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047450414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000068748086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69688845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015475726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036795103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23630677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412633012","doi":"10.59350/3mq01-c7g13","title":"Supreme Court of Canada Supports York University Appeal","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.017981339544266464,"score_gpt":0.23931905268012924,"score_spread":0.22133771313586276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412633012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12976176,0.00040982966,0.00017228386,0.0031358209,0.0021929815,0.00033380633,0.00007381567,0.000064577725,0.8638551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819714,0.00006839296,0.0000724103,0.00006618264,0.0002720977,5.5403734e-7,0.00002064608,0.0000063233774,0.01752201],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984802,0.00013979773,0.0002050759,0.00027661267,0.00062262797,0.0002756572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990853,0.00005160404,0.00019470471,0.0001963604,0.00030405069,0.00016796688],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004084471,0.00011541805,0.00033408863,0.000032243064,0.0002732539,0.000052696956,0.00038348103,0.00022070613,0.0010909169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008292571,0.00012401263,0.00008560054,0.00018878272,0.00013290964,0.00006676204,0.00027923202,0.00022361618,0.0000012732602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007031271,0.0003195229,0.058504947,0.002313253,0.00065532443,0.0008808462,0.058073897,0.00054125005,0.000118271186,0.13777731,0.73847514,0.0022699302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017054177,0.000015694122,0.0029674396,0.00031815423,0.00006936976,0.0000011661524,0.07754205,0.000015532723,0.00032113984,0.0008979782,0.91717124,0.0005097062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.997681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8522096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036157327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014140047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412991209","doi":"10.54119/jflp.rojl5550","title":"Food Law &amp; Policy: An Essential Part of Today's Legal Academy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Food Law & Policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Engineering, Michigan State University; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Temple University; Fordham University; Santa Clara University; University of Oregon; University of Miami; University of South Carolina; Georgia State University; Loyola Marymount University; University of Cincinnati; Pepperdine University; University of Denver; Georgetown University; University of Louisville; University of California, Los Angeles; University of Washington; Baylor University; University of Connecticut; Michigan State University; University of Kansas; Ohio State University; Wake Forest University; Loyola University Chicago; Harvard University; Northwestern University; University of Missouri; University of Pittsburgh; Syracuse University; University of Oklahoma; University of Southern California; Louisiana State University; University of Pennsylvania; George Washington University; Tulane University; Yale University; University of Wisconsin-Madison; Arizona State University; University of Notre Dame; Yeshiva University; Emory University; Marquette University; West Virginia University; Florida State University; Case Western Reserve University; University of Minnesota; Brigham Young University; Vanderbilt University; York University; George Mason University; Boston College","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.052120436121788544,"score_gpt":0.38265434869161224,"score_spread":0.3305339125698237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412991209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5526419,0.0007052315,0.000025480535,0.036496583,0.001103246,0.00026539358,0.00007336773,0.000039825856,0.40864897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813472,0.00012186313,0.00007182103,0.0011336935,0.016684767,0.0000024363644,8.08702e-7,0.00002417513,0.0006132106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972134,0.00024026654,0.0008183787,0.00019296366,0.0009512767,0.0005836935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971467,0.00006758193,0.0015954386,0.0003198536,0.0003765502,0.0004938451],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011932803,0.00019684828,0.0005750867,0.00015351875,0.0014885619,0.00054694567,0.0012365482,0.00028193725,0.00005883371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006788904,0.00017028683,0.00030013052,0.00023413925,0.0010011806,0.0021067474,0.000115312505,0.00044907822,0.000013929983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007304286,0.00013465622,0.00015530079,0.000035318757,0.00012429744,0.0000038674402,0.0036385527,0.00000410349,0.0006726359,0.99297065,0.0013648057,0.00082276494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073529966,0.0009838796,0.0005979692,0.00015092558,0.00006504227,0.000031177035,0.00048122788,3.8197518e-7,0.0036567308,0.06582119,0.927242,0.00023420219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12553544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.068195775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9271495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013543184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013966297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413128904","doi":"10.32920/29896184.v1","title":"If It Wasn’t Required Before, It Is Now: All Family Lawyers Must Screen for Family Violence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Internet privacy; Criminology; Domestic violence; Law; Business; Psychology; Political science; Medical emergency; Computer science; Medicine; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control","score_opus":0.0360926448195204,"score_gpt":0.33408760908523744,"score_spread":0.29799496426571703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413128904","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020046221,0.0007888131,0.005034279,0.05857781,0.0013442189,0.0016110942,0.00011520404,0.00032224812,0.9121601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9114312,0.0004933213,0.0005810885,0.041116275,0.00067219837,0.000110096495,0.000014248763,0.00002183683,0.045559753],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997761,0.00007409338,0.00046286528,0.0005161652,0.0005157203,0.0006701692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989085,0.00015097832,0.00013076329,0.00027472895,0.00035215425,0.00018283946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009010928,0.00021178628,0.00035469866,0.00010314763,0.00073071494,0.00023788818,0.0006772916,0.00024721606,0.00014292552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020637154,0.0001862032,0.00017309177,0.00058118545,0.0002597133,0.0005160791,0.00010593093,0.00012560308,0.00016548623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054802338,0.000069843576,0.0009999186,0.00012582341,0.000094276904,0.0000031096401,0.007262641,0.0000046145697,0.0005104141,0.083725005,0.89712626,0.0100232875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004598391,0.00008745891,0.0007450505,0.00025591833,0.000047054204,9.363698e-8,0.023252344,0.00008894304,0.00019607537,0.012937922,0.96166503,0.00026427387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08038129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028614085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89138496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016876217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005598104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9891112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413129202","doi":"10.32920/29896187.v1","title":"Judging Family Violence: Recommendations for Judicial Practices and Guidelines in Family Violence Cases","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Criminology; Family law; Political science; Psychology; Medicine; Medical emergency; Human factors and ergonomics; Law; Poison control","score_opus":0.10017146434965322,"score_gpt":0.44044627123906105,"score_spread":0.3402748068894078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413129202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7726002,0.013137671,0.007631966,0.06252724,0.002931711,0.0022900857,0.00006236156,0.0003331071,0.1384857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98642725,0.0074167317,0.0017424974,0.0031355664,0.00044198157,0.000116030584,0.000004099241,0.0000074924146,0.0007083516],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852556,0.0001261009,0.000479692,0.00033938765,0.00020304375,0.00032623066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826354,0.00091120455,0.00025703813,0.000102827835,0.0003969864,0.00006838507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001388963,0.00012390438,0.00023277372,0.00017122991,0.00076556846,0.0002148277,0.0002090345,0.000113771894,0.000017510964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004409501,0.00011497746,0.00004008964,0.00059661496,0.00013187731,0.00063925947,0.000062345316,0.00011189145,0.000004413203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011361497,0.00015010845,0.039094813,0.00022108795,0.000048287548,0.000010013213,0.003602669,0.000026957518,0.0009379874,0.17597961,0.036154695,0.74366015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012884818,0.00016156673,0.014824919,0.0051420927,0.00009881631,0.000002337645,0.100227304,0.001187801,0.00029374534,0.10230467,0.77370816,0.00076010404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19086426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037013065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7429001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007059481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005608885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98055893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244051","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v15i2.127","title":"Crown Immunity in Class Proceedings: The Injustice of Barring Institutional Historical Abuse Claims","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Sovereign immunity; Legislation; Political science; Liability; Redress; Class action; Supreme court; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.07469835458697197,"score_gpt":0.3140843348932329,"score_spread":0.23938598030626093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30810335,0.14710692,0.00011477363,0.24483953,0.0037233788,0.0043152985,0.000063264226,0.00021452805,0.29151896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814657,0.013986692,0.0000101746455,0.0039954553,0.00039477498,0.000033471988,0.000001918223,0.000006708621,0.00010507863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882597,0.00010944007,0.00036882283,0.00016129647,0.00029026635,0.00024421752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914926,0.00006474062,0.00016667179,0.000077008925,0.00020351904,0.0003387741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007324581,0.00009154294,0.00026164996,0.000060293198,0.0005107005,0.000045474808,0.0003005865,0.000085881606,0.00015327122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010192727,0.00007555258,0.000068050096,0.000935899,0.00015235312,0.00032259908,0.000013750727,0.00032793306,0.000026012503],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012659021,0.00022367509,0.03009778,0.027611965,0.0001924679,0.00007145452,0.07447393,0.00019374397,0.0016770358,0.4718142,0.30271536,0.09080181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055998724,0.000012741277,0.0011805206,0.0007969596,0.000026130483,0.0000014166259,0.0012096984,0.000022812796,0.000010496409,0.000044973956,0.9965453,0.000092920534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36965293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46183014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69382995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015540569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001416923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6345446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413465329","doi":"10.29173/mlj1392","title":"The Effect of R. v. Morrison on Sexual Assault Law: Is the Reasonable Steps Requirement an Articulation of Mens Rea or a Statutory Bar on the Defence of Mistaken Belief?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mens rea; Statutory law; Sexual assault; Law; Articulation (sociology); Statutory interpretation; Criminal law; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Poison control; Medicine; Suicide prevention; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.03271057274661248,"score_gpt":0.31713863252725577,"score_spread":0.2844280597806433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413465329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95512193,0.00032623776,0.00003442917,0.002409297,0.00036994836,0.0005969394,0.000013999604,0.000011366634,0.04111586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99923986,0.00004155929,0.000010536366,0.00024198616,0.00019430548,0.000013539815,6.274732e-7,0.00000739276,0.00025020746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970629,0.0010334976,0.00048887683,0.00014480366,0.0010159404,0.00025397283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977599,0.0010477684,0.0005150984,0.00028701237,0.00033335722,0.000056880053],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043429644,0.00012186647,0.00023626862,0.000024198853,0.0016198836,0.00013250437,0.0004482551,0.00007844339,0.0000360091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046140066,0.00005375705,0.000078015255,0.00021630735,0.00048805226,0.00017960354,0.000033924753,0.0002751932,0.0000029015252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020986677,0.00041282078,0.0072116763,0.00029820416,0.0004277664,0.000013474607,0.021154797,0.00067046663,0.0044170804,0.9325818,0.010273839,0.02043944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004200578,0.015890507,0.023244468,0.0039817723,0.000973228,0.000019493942,0.4285266,0.0009099983,0.10987766,0.032080542,0.37935182,0.0009433284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.081567116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13181452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90050125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001407405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019012822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413491303","doi":"10.64628/aap.qguy9drpk","title":"La Cour suprême du Canada a tort de ne pas traduire ses décisions rendues avant 1970","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Psychology","score_opus":0.02278039579421288,"score_gpt":0.2836202769346866,"score_spread":0.26083988114047374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413491303","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15436496,0.08719478,0.00030938027,0.16104425,0.013570672,0.00052021455,0.00032159148,0.00044533092,0.58222884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87788737,0.0027685687,0.00007653979,0.00070635095,0.0026912647,0.00001636893,0.0000040602854,0.000025740837,0.11582377],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974967,0.00032336172,0.00041025775,0.00040851007,0.0006909346,0.0006702382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985496,0.0007064323,0.000060226852,0.0001564432,0.000114019145,0.00041330204],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008909948,0.00023969561,0.00034198436,0.000048775022,0.00063783344,0.0004517273,0.0003276486,0.00024588619,0.00231283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030864697,0.00020084274,0.00013298773,0.00054348254,0.00034508426,0.0004719882,0.00005744568,0.00031159108,0.00011943028],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008118308,0.00008272207,0.0014203336,0.00030715595,0.000114704606,0.00092910236,0.017966866,0.000013791191,0.000059048496,0.31426173,0.6411979,0.023638498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007870291,0.000048976584,0.00037395654,0.00044509428,0.00007450018,0.0000580775,0.0092796665,0.00024634358,0.00007359913,0.0023752674,0.986656,0.0002898024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9924568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.994911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72352237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006364043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007264767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413492554","doi":"10.64628/aam.crpfmdaha","title":"New Brunswick’s notwithstanding clause use could spur Supreme Court action","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Spur; Action (physics); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering; Physics","score_opus":0.08332863056189613,"score_gpt":0.35784609865889316,"score_spread":0.27451746809699706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413492554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23674254,0.0032304707,0.072667,0.0320514,0.015647376,0.0015355716,0.000015675805,0.00375552,0.6343544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9275788,0.00023243506,0.00019926151,0.00020412213,0.0017464644,0.0000017014822,0.0000017617409,0.000017711614,0.07001771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998658,0.00005772786,0.00019937102,0.00026244504,0.0005003293,0.00032212544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994139,0.00015641293,0.000036430727,0.00010683584,0.0000819845,0.0002044089],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046912,0.00011121188,0.00014485362,0.00008489595,0.00042082404,0.0009930757,0.0001439948,0.00014926775,0.0011602094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017152389,0.00009368223,0.000068074376,0.00048813398,0.00006435275,0.0013492818,0.000025278514,0.00018310876,0.00035404158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035290494,0.000030379499,0.009237813,0.00012827029,0.000082228165,0.000048888876,0.015657997,0.000015303018,0.0012490604,0.6591071,0.30047473,0.013932974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010049126,0.000028520837,0.0008782994,0.000117461124,0.000026638783,0.0000023324314,0.0029077677,0.00013668115,0.00048237632,0.0020579114,0.99307585,0.00018566991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28634888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17672028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69260114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021833487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013354878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413509072","doi":"10.64628/aam.ghg75u4vu","title":"How regulatory agencies, not the courts, are imposing COVID-19 vaccine mandates","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Virology; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Business; Political science; Public administration; Medicine; Outbreak","score_opus":0.042201717369762,"score_gpt":0.3080121269447169,"score_spread":0.26581040957495494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413509072","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25562695,0.014044469,0.0017855522,0.5779955,0.0023939272,0.0008566691,0.000044315166,0.000653861,0.14659874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9649199,0.00024824345,0.00005182438,0.0058172946,0.00080488785,0.000008322978,0.000004120291,0.000009586482,0.028135767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863183,0.00019556315,0.00015867733,0.00024262392,0.00046560128,0.00030567264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903363,0.0002150877,0.00012341228,0.00022579894,0.00020338407,0.00019870554],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082582934,0.00010296019,0.00017565726,0.000022379481,0.0015639904,0.0006049161,0.00025956304,0.0000898061,0.00047490167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010140389,0.00006832168,0.0000682809,0.00031292325,0.0001285448,0.0003015793,0.00007688292,0.00011091736,0.000016864988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004983731,0.00010443541,0.020213893,0.0003271168,0.0001604152,0.00026810393,0.040391374,0.000037109206,0.0077318926,0.463136,0.46213505,0.0054448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016323493,0.000008747783,0.0017769468,0.000023078568,0.00001915439,0.0000057737398,0.038209993,0.000010983077,0.0021002819,0.00256427,0.95497113,0.00014640822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0102537135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030627707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.709293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019112974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010485234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413531799","doi":"10.64628/aam.wsegxdmwk","title":"Canada’s Genetic Non-Discrimination Act has only had a limited impact on the use of genetic information by life insurers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Genetic discrimination; Actuarial science; Genetic testing; Business; Internet privacy; Genetics; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.039260072851107254,"score_gpt":0.2725445132854513,"score_spread":0.23328444043434407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413531799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9691933,0.00038603172,0.00063460245,0.012599165,0.00048497572,0.000656299,0.00008975199,0.00006595398,0.015889954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982232,0.00008009182,0.000032876807,0.001062707,0.00010069634,0.000009547673,0.000011704829,0.0000075291405,0.0004716452],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870193,0.00009370304,0.0003054646,0.000107493695,0.00058166124,0.00020973348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926764,0.00024656087,0.00010356417,0.000118619835,0.00015037318,0.000113267284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000233854,0.000109502784,0.00012747305,0.00007898573,0.0003075881,0.0004591882,0.00016851736,0.00007520334,0.00012832953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045021847,0.00006652456,0.00005700896,0.00042268436,0.000103015154,0.0005709415,0.000016458727,0.00010144592,0.000019184088],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053978154,0.00007112103,0.009445909,0.00022583113,0.00016964055,0.0000045825695,0.027024142,0.0014188038,0.00030852688,0.0072920197,0.9077611,0.046224345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019137195,0.0002457758,0.16212223,0.00020861997,0.00006287217,0.0000014811966,0.0036322318,0.0062866164,0.00032476147,0.00020196829,0.8263976,0.00032446222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97072494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8412794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15267633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023824093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004985635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8844303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413540783","doi":"10.64628/aap.tyae45tsd","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada is wrong to refuse to translate its pre-1970 decisions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Supreme Court Decisions; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02956892846037685,"score_gpt":0.327476425723971,"score_spread":0.29790749726359417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413540783","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32937926,0.003767296,0.0012722925,0.26449174,0.002981356,0.0016596686,0.00013570755,0.00019515284,0.39611754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720409,0.0000723515,0.00004649221,0.0009587682,0.00018643907,0.000015772455,2.2609142e-7,0.000008452451,0.026670603],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862194,0.000049484566,0.00024104281,0.00018548677,0.00059668854,0.0003053424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908185,0.0003728421,0.000018620933,0.00013698945,0.00015426255,0.0002354374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006338923,0.00007409592,0.0001256456,0.000033066797,0.00052025175,0.00015337628,0.00034157958,0.0000439373,0.00027940905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035505585,0.000047304853,0.000043284253,0.00059149734,0.00003431248,0.00012438909,0.000030320125,0.000069905436,0.000040103285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003602758,0.000022241153,0.00015711175,0.000051073283,0.000072251576,0.000015388261,0.071989894,0.0000923583,0.0009140317,0.098164916,0.8004627,0.028021988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028473452,0.000026364307,0.0003076965,0.00009323334,0.0000081805665,2.392543e-7,0.0017439123,0.00003061912,0.0010007868,0.0008686219,0.99580735,0.00008451863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9039046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9898585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64266163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009690643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014783153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40014082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413585640","doi":"10.64628/aam.pj6gsdwug","title":"Punishment vs. deportation: What we can learn from the case of the truck driver in the Humboldt Broncos bus crash","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Deportation; Crash; Truck; Punishment (psychology); Criminology; Aeronautics; Engineering; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Automotive engineering; Law; Social psychology; Operating system; Immigration","score_opus":0.030904834011231633,"score_gpt":0.30536616051980675,"score_spread":0.27446132650857513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413585640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8579197,0.0032039261,0.000016913333,0.08939671,0.003727349,0.0025205314,0.00009078031,0.00005551353,0.043068603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949259,0.0012154132,0.000015161299,0.0013428455,0.00060486904,0.00017312811,0.000015062328,0.000014592515,0.0016930315],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99667484,0.0011918965,0.00054635195,0.00040079944,0.0009024769,0.00028364774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980666,0.0005834074,0.0005268632,0.0006401064,0.00013014674,0.00005285937],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015625145,0.00020312019,0.00033488715,0.000031067375,0.0011323944,0.00058446894,0.0014057286,0.00018923372,0.0013342259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022222815,0.00010230633,0.00019398968,0.0004303832,0.000369931,0.0002025834,0.0005687161,0.0008173831,0.0000053013905],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038300674,0.000349018,0.086338244,0.00021610882,0.00028856797,0.00072875124,0.7824697,0.0015775529,0.000018067634,0.061076228,0.035636496,0.031263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038537814,0.00004687855,0.03988454,0.00035825005,0.00015761351,0.000019310812,0.64016855,0.000037519636,0.00006520879,0.03890561,0.2795186,0.00045253718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70516026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7661884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24388209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022976016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010232141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413591586","doi":"10.64628/aam.kxugq7nwa","title":"Could a Roe v. Wade-style reversal of abortion rights happen in Canada?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Style (visual arts); Political science; History; Law; Pregnancy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.018759164361497185,"score_gpt":0.29173397028040593,"score_spread":0.27297480591890877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413591586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3003345,0.0007329687,0.00006476205,0.0034563912,0.0026370806,0.0011727402,0.00012370579,0.000065772605,0.6914121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99502873,0.00007350884,0.00003155072,0.00011853308,0.00022404896,0.000045222037,0.000021662789,0.000008575152,0.004448184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784017,0.00020604314,0.0004719454,0.00032536857,0.00086781284,0.00028867673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999202,0.000069650465,0.00031822055,0.00019729833,0.000118004435,0.000094795796],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007315152,0.00013490402,0.00039115662,0.000086351814,0.0002465075,0.000039168517,0.00046452443,0.00017228349,0.0023240843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010026854,0.00012787795,0.00006392126,0.00030938417,0.0000728378,0.00010277373,0.0002763793,0.00047251926,0.000004278026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028706656,0.00061775924,0.11711869,0.0022568027,0.00041001954,0.0005004006,0.11270469,0.005050554,0.00015386003,0.5133402,0.2420658,0.005494203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035998478,0.00003604304,0.008600212,0.00028239857,0.000037257676,6.0804274e-7,0.014545166,0.00019380996,0.00013118162,0.018177604,0.9570771,0.00055863505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99987996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99984026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7150113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015457561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008564515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413600467","doi":"10.64628/aai.6phtmxf5w","title":"Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife have bolstered conservative causes as he is poised to lead the Supreme Court rolling back more landmark rulings","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Landmark; Wife; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Cartography; Geography","score_opus":0.08462225352389136,"score_gpt":0.35862834934852267,"score_spread":0.2740060958246313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413600467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5184105,0.0049135946,0.0008474547,0.17137493,0.0031676863,0.005426014,0.0005729996,0.0004444551,0.29484233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94080347,0.0009994537,0.00055952196,0.013241486,0.000984966,0.00021850373,0.000030082227,0.000053516877,0.043109022],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99630934,0.0005154038,0.0005805973,0.0008970168,0.0010967823,0.00060084736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973959,0.0009022733,0.00041417556,0.0004667506,0.0005410539,0.00027987314],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015522236,0.00042168613,0.00067770685,0.000089475485,0.001814448,0.00078416645,0.0009666627,0.00035274203,0.0014814604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001148613,0.00031848685,0.00014287225,0.00035756774,0.000498305,0.00025459845,0.0010319822,0.000876524,0.000071510076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059236743,0.00018973462,0.06526202,0.0017513607,0.00077165116,0.00011595602,0.6589296,0.00067031465,0.00027002874,0.010867959,0.25974816,0.0008308694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073642004,0.00017063411,0.003147941,0.0007632539,0.0005581876,0.0000074525715,0.24004336,0.00061354594,0.00035854845,0.0065727048,0.74570787,0.001320061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1891888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031894222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48595974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022055776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011007228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413968468","doi":"10.64628/aam.y33s9jttc","title":"The B.C. Supreme Court’s recognition of Cowichan title is an invitation to enact transformative change","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Sociology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.1306106194371652,"score_gpt":0.36841918799336154,"score_spread":0.23780856855619634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413968468","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004415004,0.00023541192,0.0010494124,0.009502103,0.0012123629,0.0012191286,0.0002563309,0.00006666413,0.98204356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99165416,0.0004222894,0.0001322271,0.0009447634,0.0004493394,0.00010456258,0.000040991443,0.0000055672417,0.006246098],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934185,0.000092523114,0.00015196553,0.000105827225,0.00020868615,0.00009913434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995179,0.000060325947,0.00007349015,0.00008238461,0.00022454598,0.000041345786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046201597,0.000061819315,0.000109896086,0.000046116187,0.00018022893,0.00005430649,0.0001523287,0.00011405694,0.00028738246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000632825,0.00004558149,0.000040636434,0.00012388547,0.000043123,0.0001225683,0.00003412763,0.00009343935,0.000074238276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004007995,0.00009078136,0.00008314204,0.00053298625,0.000104266175,4.112953e-7,0.4956209,0.0000028530362,0.000052270487,0.039697118,0.07155468,0.3922205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016948054,0.00012760631,0.00034019374,0.00068945024,0.000072313764,9.72655e-8,0.037894003,0.00013652894,0.0026287413,0.092845336,0.86470985,0.0003863669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024039632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017247912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9872392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046648074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001628273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98245937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414240189","doi":"10.22329/cjpp.v10i1.8450","title":"Ultimate Integrity: A Reformulation of Unlimited Liability","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Practical Philosophy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Dignity; Liability; Nobility; Strict liability; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.12485736454289896,"score_gpt":0.39207513681352024,"score_spread":0.26721777227062127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414240189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5803646,0.0002728546,0.00035058035,0.15978338,0.0022629658,0.0004782816,0.000056454763,0.00006525701,0.25636566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99879175,0.000023060331,0.00023370897,0.00015348359,0.0007213573,9.0591385e-7,0.0000018750851,0.000007732125,0.00006611456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985386,0.00023717005,0.0004792463,0.00009439149,0.00038540456,0.0002651911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979002,0.00034859488,0.00037623738,0.00010171298,0.00069783634,0.0005754073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021597126,0.00007184132,0.00023480096,0.00028023895,0.0002639534,0.00005915723,0.00017277511,0.0001323771,0.00013326564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007033686,0.00006123326,0.00010310853,0.0008670259,0.00029878545,0.00069222157,0.000009529699,0.0003856913,0.00004292303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015765826,0.00010619596,0.02617964,0.00021427471,0.00013700376,0.00033493352,0.014442688,0.00006990205,0.00029096633,0.94669855,0.006587375,0.0047808383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069580507,0.00039563928,0.020916536,0.00037825565,0.000100806195,0.000033950168,0.003684317,0.0002020925,0.0001904355,0.77533364,0.19774993,0.00031861966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05149601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027377304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4184272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022615811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002687028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9903705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414379000","doi":"10.5149/northcarolina/9781469678535.003.0009","title":"My Bones Are a Property Bequeathed to Me","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Emigration; Politics; Personal property; Racism; White (mutation); Property (philosophy); Property rights","score_opus":0.039623799716263695,"score_gpt":0.29211523191091093,"score_spread":0.25249143219464726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414379000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010927329,0.001429266,0.000014983831,0.009497677,0.00086017227,0.00066474185,0.000024230125,0.00032723066,0.98717076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019492298,0.00014600066,0.000034350807,0.0007615662,0.0021649487,0.000034658366,0.0000029960236,0.00005370166,0.97730947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833554,0.000015740634,0.0002927755,0.00045538708,0.0005939597,0.0003065899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992495,0.000035841455,0.0000991886,0.00019037936,0.00019794858,0.00022711385],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035287213,0.00025069714,0.0004349536,0.00011435505,0.0003178876,0.00030074996,0.0003193485,0.0003668575,0.0021999981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007695346,0.00014895535,0.000156394,0.00008535338,0.00013066074,0.000119114295,0.000113875496,0.00023848377,0.0042302497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005168273,0.0000068942604,0.000007904585,0.00013056342,0.000050191746,0.000039789575,0.0042636395,1.9646e-7,0.00001045052,0.9318441,0.06208182,0.001559268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026551055,0.000032668308,0.0000013862933,0.00052813214,0.000036459965,9.3561863e-7,0.0008101875,4.715684e-7,0.000008375798,0.077522345,0.9207469,0.0002855699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020509446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03548552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8586651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014537512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003528797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414427548","doi":"10.32388/jryxr5","title":"Review of: \"Reframing Housing Policy through Behavioral Public Law: Nudges, Ethics, and Regulatory Design\"","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Public policy; Government (linguistics); Public housing; Legislation","score_opus":0.1841965846472584,"score_gpt":0.4495732312931537,"score_spread":0.2653766466458953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414427548","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000011754647,0.68721,0.00031422835,0.14749813,0.0010379887,0.0011642495,0.000059925274,0.00011457441,0.16259971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010961754,0.8779707,0.0010668166,0.05079714,0.0014655559,0.00006488213,0.00008860189,0.000045200693,0.06740494],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950066,0.0015387482,0.0010537049,0.0006267747,0.0011718227,0.00060233806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966722,0.0006201388,0.0007718314,0.00048695394,0.0012621015,0.00018674272],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065233475,0.00040708686,0.0015080501,0.00013690615,0.0011435244,0.00022393509,0.00065339863,0.0009165268,0.00027980542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037697642,0.00036068275,0.00024870454,0.0010991556,0.00092841603,0.0005642361,0.00026495173,0.0012642047,0.000007921426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011501411,0.000044827142,0.000006046498,0.09069261,0.00004161847,0.0000029487762,0.0012316426,2.9485582e-8,0.0000011620684,0.17629257,0.71505743,0.016627992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006349233,0.000027224063,0.0000014800859,0.107246764,0.00024311793,0.0000012424165,0.00024764685,1.06991926e-7,0.000006600263,0.0027076725,0.8891131,0.00034151273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28948364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023272743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2662109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031106753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066986824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414620344","doi":"10.1017/s135232522510075x","title":"Can We Legally Revise the Highest Legal Rule?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"University of Wisconsin-Madison","keywords":"Legal realism; Field (mathematics); Legal ethics; Legal research; Rule of law; Legal profession; Empirical legal studies","score_opus":0.010976192213895092,"score_gpt":0.28737852891891985,"score_spread":0.2764023367050248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414620344","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066842763,0.004706626,0.00019634164,0.109593906,0.0018956177,0.00051277375,0.000010736862,0.00023413815,0.87616557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88375956,0.00031237927,0.000021209902,0.0030269297,0.0011902504,0.000041897594,0.0000018421252,0.000015842357,0.1116301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975926,0.00073439017,0.0003426034,0.00033371634,0.00046592453,0.0005307656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987568,0.00045598578,0.0001236457,0.00037979305,0.00015921459,0.00012456121],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021685134,0.00019468254,0.00028063776,0.00008403183,0.0015184364,0.00060747185,0.0008329298,0.0001550171,0.00028142286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000636266,0.00013568712,0.00015366833,0.00072703266,0.00066496345,0.00046030572,0.00011571606,0.0003969447,0.00012924713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036016685,0.000031656793,0.00016463952,0.00004011791,0.000036191344,0.000015690697,0.0023576461,0.0000030148715,0.00007719923,0.9710844,0.013346472,0.01280696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016835549,0.00001665708,0.00027457258,0.00015457458,0.00003507073,0.0000014174577,0.0024164666,0.0000016916794,0.00012870431,0.14111087,0.8555334,0.00015822134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029078454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010927915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87707525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014544507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092993357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414957244","doi":"10.21991/cf29495","title":"Out of the Shadows: Responsive Judicial Review and the Resurgence of the Notwithstanding Clause","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Legitimacy; Judicial activism; Charter; Judicial independence; Democratic legitimacy; Order (exchange); Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.017971527778015053,"score_gpt":0.301501207142136,"score_spread":0.283529679364121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414957244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010478321,0.09693648,0.011807532,0.29176855,0.013546168,0.007459626,0.00071165216,0.00012524372,0.56716645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943575,0.0018484147,0.00002347009,0.0029072382,0.000086940694,0.000047925532,0.000001588591,0.0000031696616,0.0007237498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975246,0.0004813884,0.0007235285,0.00027334417,0.0006346441,0.00036245663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760693,0.00078797044,0.0004963071,0.00040121333,0.0006457165,0.00006187323],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018864769,0.00017597107,0.00046002053,0.00007424308,0.0029074657,0.0000489985,0.0007271943,0.00013463583,0.000043367436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061538215,0.00009288721,0.0002683226,0.00095553516,0.022224009,0.0002765868,0.00035596642,0.0002790893,0.0000041855164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095405434,0.000021401194,0.008432634,0.0001627976,0.00006628096,5.3252734e-7,0.0005644994,0.000021308804,0.000066871246,0.98369455,0.006714867,0.00015884211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029179412,0.000035493453,0.003824334,0.011393823,0.00091030146,0.000025337698,0.012254781,0.00004917416,0.0011464137,0.2451017,0.7218396,0.00050108496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020042525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003606181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9838792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013144834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004116982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417326230","doi":"10.1515/9781773856698-012","title":"10 “I am Not Going Back to Canada:” The Law Comes for Buck","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Action (physics); Term (time)","score_opus":0.029548226123193994,"score_gpt":0.22369446673483237,"score_spread":0.19414624061163838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417326230","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000031815838,0.00030527925,0.0004342735,0.00077283365,0.0006208294,0.0019034139,0.00029522512,0.000026609492,0.9956097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017236529,0.00007282541,0.00016231915,0.0009151041,0.00025385476,0.0000018233382,0.000010780546,0.000024609484,0.98132217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974015,0.00012324608,0.00045524628,0.0006261512,0.00082954863,0.0005643225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725705,0.0007561165,0.00050277804,0.00047318666,0.0006989806,0.00031187304],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046252488,0.0004289365,0.0008596275,0.00007934593,0.0020150577,0.0001025852,0.0015344309,0.00044483843,0.00063994253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000686647,0.00042560356,0.00036408036,0.000035310775,0.0010525375,0.00010455598,0.0005678043,0.00037171633,0.000025349385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047306868,0.000011968654,0.0000021128094,0.00055656966,0.00029489136,0.000015269472,0.0041717943,0.000010760838,0.000014899519,0.9713875,0.014195729,0.008865449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004711172,0.00013805363,0.0000047406775,0.00072976336,0.0003072804,4.9678766e-7,0.001055704,0.00006376127,0.00018854268,0.00079542364,0.9957903,0.0004548415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96310294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9709285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98159456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003595735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022649667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W52213294","doi":"","title":"A History of Gender Variance in Pre-20th Century Anglo-American Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas journal of women and the law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Politics; Supreme court; Law; State (computer science); Battle; Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.014410756946399619,"score_gpt":0.25890060571800777,"score_spread":0.24448984877160815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W52213294","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7849413,0.008629993,0.00004183721,0.0015674698,0.00050395576,0.00015799254,0.0000017088971,0.000008298114,0.20414741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99823344,0.00054562703,0.0000416137,0.0006701633,0.00022283911,0.0000012711749,4.229856e-8,0.0000045798292,0.0002804471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901694,0.00015328798,0.0002834125,0.00006474913,0.00027050753,0.00021107854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993467,0.00006909522,0.00034885315,0.00006392506,0.00007702485,0.00009443216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00145245,0.00006041653,0.00028008063,0.00003071177,0.00008299894,0.000021754995,0.00018506631,0.000030113986,0.000033285294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049395712,0.000039003055,0.000045373832,0.00014673117,0.0010989688,0.00020713001,0.000019947549,0.00014404552,0.0000012505358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001579657,0.000057834717,0.00047224984,0.000021152277,0.000027376478,0.0000101001815,0.097201206,0.000013286625,0.000026944084,0.9016427,0.000055523815,0.0003136495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00440699,0.0003484453,0.006172806,0.00018618727,0.000033398068,0.000031489795,0.013578893,0.000002024875,0.000038230704,0.27546668,0.69951296,0.00022189876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03214518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028500047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6994574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004920873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031283865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97429985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W55417016","doi":"","title":"Come Shale Away: Navigating the \"Business Friendliness\" of Regulatory Environments in the Marcellus Shale and Albertan Oil Sands","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oil sands; Oil shale; Unconventional oil; Shale oil; Petroleum; Steam-assisted gravity drainage; Investment (military); Appeal; Natural gas; State (computer science); Synthetic crude; Politics; Economy; Business; Political science; Asphalt; Law; Geology; Engineering; Economics; Geography; Archaeology; Waste management","score_opus":0.011095980493860291,"score_gpt":0.2526587822495339,"score_spread":0.24156280175567363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W55417016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9302897,0.00048068707,0.000009302427,0.0041383286,0.00009341596,0.0001886761,0.0000016802042,0.000009520677,0.06478873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966413,0.00009894991,0.000019824402,0.0002716889,0.00016762117,0.000034007313,0.0000015568571,0.000007523942,0.0027575255],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987544,0.00016601007,0.00027444222,0.0001672733,0.0004033243,0.00023458705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929047,0.00031473467,0.00012631927,0.0001825049,0.00004091263,0.000045078697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007992982,0.00009762802,0.00016663095,0.000016728847,0.00043018122,0.0000991834,0.00033099248,0.000075429896,0.00025810886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013924924,0.000053440766,0.000026513113,0.00032704274,0.00047640476,0.00028610314,0.000072232,0.0001444735,0.00001553038],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003301562,0.00049615477,0.6185402,0.00048213403,0.00007438797,0.00001397406,0.20945585,0.000051102954,0.005050789,0.07906287,0.002837858,0.08390166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011758334,0.00007320876,0.7885101,0.0005092061,0.000043626915,0.000009914145,0.12554389,0.00049232726,0.00052278634,0.008584645,0.073890865,0.0006436035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13016166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007285845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16996989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002649887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056292953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8756307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W566458213","doi":"10.29173/alr29","title":"Re-defining Privity of Contract: &lt;i&gt;Brown v. Belleville (City)&lt;/i&gt;","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privity of contract; Business; Exclusion clause; Contract management; Marketing","score_opus":0.04016965325434883,"score_gpt":0.3079388001415848,"score_spread":0.26776914688723596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W566458213","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036707972,0.1896868,0.000011112086,0.004994257,0.00044320276,0.0007553386,0.000007579434,0.000050651917,0.8003803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97008324,0.02407229,0.00007276027,0.0017930674,0.00030418904,0.000044733413,0.000008365361,0.000025369092,0.0035959815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972217,0.00044563465,0.0007446858,0.0003703439,0.0007336127,0.0004839946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975874,0.00069101393,0.00052294985,0.0004199852,0.0004212559,0.00035739757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026045141,0.00022154713,0.00090473774,0.000029720683,0.00041516227,0.00006810827,0.00050351204,0.00016670857,0.0005078831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033063004,0.0001872692,0.00021191733,0.00057384983,0.00038875462,0.0005011582,0.00011367786,0.00016257835,0.00031242848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000100367,0.00011454548,0.0009505769,0.0013426973,0.00005298537,0.0000047213603,0.002807565,7.621236e-7,0.000070608374,0.96723807,0.02093067,0.0064767846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023866438,0.00006097606,0.000080305894,0.002780532,0.00009858005,0.0000015379272,0.000055223274,0.0000019483764,0.000041875293,0.0012681979,0.9951319,0.00024023214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07238469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22955486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97420126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008979882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047092553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93379235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W58102176","doi":"","title":"Memorandum of Argument, Supreme Court of Canada, in re James R. Demers","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholars Crossing (Liberty University)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Argument (complex analysis); Memorandum; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.019228257440710154,"score_gpt":0.24382944643619522,"score_spread":0.22460118899548506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W58102176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8289193,0.00028205695,0.000024119987,0.00054977083,0.00027037528,0.00013955688,0.000011430859,0.000014564776,0.16978885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928791,0.000030233638,0.00012773111,0.00004449765,0.000017413215,1.278246e-7,8.2673847e-7,0.000006711071,0.0068933615],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986468,0.00023567234,0.0002202825,0.00018314901,0.00040253493,0.0003115729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927956,0.000074788,0.0001976386,0.00012612496,0.00020575747,0.000116108975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070592493,0.00009367711,0.00025214767,0.00015925184,0.0006368126,0.0000806284,0.00026317587,0.00010398228,0.00009093586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036847973,0.00010179194,0.000055254393,0.0009179755,0.00046678027,0.0006139815,0.000027579068,0.00017467071,6.704247e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004223904,0.0005856162,0.71761364,0.00060678425,0.00030774463,0.00033508427,0.084239654,0.0005850608,0.010399666,0.16064225,0.020808654,0.0034534398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014257279,0.000042536794,0.014107499,0.00033031925,0.00004400501,8.926046e-7,0.031395815,0.0000058885903,0.007958855,0.0010965599,0.9432506,0.000341292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.65074795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8267186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92244196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000305306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002848796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5053642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W581529536","doi":"","title":"The law of privacy in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Carswell eBooks","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.023419802582677774,"score_gpt":0.23669831746089617,"score_spread":0.2132785148782184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W581529536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028494897,0.0016191207,3.9170376e-7,0.00004791045,0.0007089732,0.00032089752,0.000012277471,0.0000105075915,0.996995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33532843,0.000067868306,0.0000017681432,0.00011441339,0.0003337367,0.000011861687,0.0000014941754,0.000017855953,0.6641226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986328,0.000092725204,0.00035719573,0.00017621201,0.0004336143,0.00030746448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908155,0.00018646213,0.0002656768,0.00025386724,0.00012807164,0.0000843784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042889733,0.00013816182,0.00030840992,0.000024656913,0.00028227837,0.000030841544,0.0006114661,0.00017707946,0.000035172696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061023493,0.00010527653,0.00006660901,0.000030106192,0.00043561985,0.000027967735,0.00007006798,0.00026716312,0.000008788034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009299644,0.000003365775,0.000074060925,0.00009579721,0.000026353333,0.000021462854,0.011401751,2.6097874e-7,0.0000029274847,0.9500672,0.033678286,0.0046192254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058241,0.000008455014,0.000012316124,0.00014609689,0.000010764408,2.196657e-7,0.00069767697,1.2497503e-7,0.000054997945,0.036867775,0.96202165,0.000121686346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99770164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92834336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073168887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013814084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9917767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W584632781","doi":"","title":"Same-Sex Relationships: From 'Odious Crime' to 'Gay Marriage'","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Eleventh; General partnership; Political science; Lesbian; Criminology; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.051808084798144825,"score_gpt":0.30909351611420016,"score_spread":0.25728543131605536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W584632781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000045549677,0.0008130471,0.0004497818,0.0012515538,0.0010843232,0.00066483335,0.00011451519,0.00031639278,0.99526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00981868,0.000029555084,0.00041768345,0.00083574076,0.0060365726,0.000032908654,0.00013344774,0.000053480326,0.98264194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973789,0.00023273265,0.00051595306,0.0005643954,0.0008587954,0.00044921876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984005,0.000532949,0.00021863056,0.00034621113,0.00020816595,0.00029352],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075380364,0.00029821415,0.00052783935,0.0001507463,0.0009861023,0.00035975862,0.0005361638,0.00077207095,0.0022441885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005261379,0.00028341133,0.00016323377,0.00021415875,0.00016757357,0.00020485024,0.00008670059,0.0005258075,0.0029558502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044393564,0.00001609867,0.00020521435,0.00001805898,0.000029689769,0.000011464518,0.003572564,0.000003943157,0.0000019495556,0.086341366,0.9086329,0.0011623418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008633883,0.000019622767,0.00028159987,0.0001272834,0.00004588452,1.90026e-7,0.00059346016,6.466935e-7,0.000004439344,0.08260244,0.9158586,0.00037949893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1977966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08920963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10858697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050467456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013856554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W598803545","doi":"","title":"The Case for a U.S. Privacy Commissioner: A Canadian Commissioner’s Perspective, 19 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 1 (2000)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Political science; Law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03197506263777512,"score_gpt":0.31079550972087383,"score_spread":0.2788204470830987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W598803545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18466158,0.0010648727,0.000098328426,0.022128284,0.0006805743,0.0026640447,0.00012587415,0.000109073466,0.78846735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95469165,0.0002593726,0.00036275334,0.0005839982,0.00030937,0.000006588356,0.000011479812,0.000020326921,0.043754432],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979093,0.00036648562,0.0003137709,0.00048167785,0.00038291462,0.00054583437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975237,0.0003449554,0.00029424872,0.0005466585,0.00052173913,0.0007686964],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007283929,0.0002110793,0.00040130483,0.00006679005,0.010693022,0.0010181854,0.003145395,0.00022964443,0.0009807188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000068859044,0.00018321729,0.00018479992,0.0004375881,0.00091438787,0.0014820079,0.00072364823,0.00024423847,0.000026934451],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017157636,0.0006911132,0.007645085,0.00030208172,0.00075808854,0.003510129,0.13787773,0.00040285962,0.00015018917,0.39284295,0.42097145,0.033132527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008039949,0.00006809082,0.0008265604,0.00007651426,0.000056304558,0.00009159655,0.0058393115,0.0002463281,0.000036724898,0.0014738755,0.9901835,0.000297222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.963221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87015915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7700301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011658918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017261645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W603411450","doi":"","title":"Dirty Puddles and Safety Valves: The Path from Fact to Remedy in \"Canada (A.G.) v. PHS Community Services Society\"","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Path (computing); Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Operating system","score_opus":0.012049421718789442,"score_gpt":0.2346356043731855,"score_spread":0.22258618265439606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W603411450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93948305,0.00069741753,0.002970507,0.011341843,0.00039419407,0.0005834824,0.00024733332,0.00005184105,0.044230316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977201,0.00013548331,0.00022738098,0.0014449462,0.0003018639,0.00002520197,0.000034070996,0.0000045946094,0.00010634276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986777,0.0003409841,0.00025472546,0.00016460234,0.0003458135,0.0002161799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849963,0.0009450054,0.00010139263,0.0001515686,0.00018759177,0.00011481738],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013879167,0.00009299252,0.00017094842,0.00002725024,0.0013282129,0.00009847089,0.000322421,0.00007546589,0.000032260214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006870629,0.000085386266,0.00004400877,0.00029494002,0.00022631286,0.00023528363,0.00005925272,0.0002436352,0.00000698236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022503571,0.00008161185,0.12084972,0.00016507601,0.00006049079,0.0000026815953,0.043349504,0.0011015997,0.00016386506,0.827926,0.0008598157,0.0054171416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011831425,0.000031766303,0.4105629,0.00089292263,0.000057542613,0.000007313224,0.08245016,0.0035314648,0.000079623285,0.17690161,0.323613,0.00068857643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9602954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98014975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6510244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074461557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016536396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W60908620","doi":"","title":"The Illusory Rights of Marvin v. Marvin for the Same-Sex Couple versus the Preferable Canadian Alternative--M. v. H.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"California western law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Same sex; Law and economics; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.06367659331093882,"score_gpt":0.308886387124464,"score_spread":0.24520979381352515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W60908620","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003948124,0.65170664,0.00019106088,0.092311196,0.003997278,0.009658499,0.00096393196,0.00012279525,0.23710051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89154404,0.09027156,0.000016419335,0.005620074,0.0013774665,0.0006001093,0.000012398249,0.000045176967,0.010512724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998044,0.00033390798,0.00045089045,0.00022530345,0.0004397381,0.00050611945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975609,0.0013204969,0.0002651117,0.00046015347,0.00022221959,0.00017108906],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019174034,0.00017339068,0.00034878263,0.000014364655,0.0023838195,0.00017372544,0.0010520278,0.00007709009,0.00034053533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034314184,0.00007913028,0.00017590809,0.00024309443,0.0006646692,0.00013236479,0.000054129883,0.00017434897,0.00021257163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010151385,0.00013044378,0.00116698,0.0032270744,0.0006096423,0.000010615268,0.0075769783,0.000033358316,0.000008340777,0.73142624,0.17879096,0.07691785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021411703,0.000034371544,0.000026960153,0.000508881,0.000088368586,9.731623e-7,0.00019897813,0.00006554952,0.000013074523,0.0012897301,0.99743515,0.00012384189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50389916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8625347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88759595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015523664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017801972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99891496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W61967472","doi":"","title":"Everything You Need to Know About Health And Safety Law In Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ASSE Professional Development Conference and Exhibition","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Need to know; Law; Business; Political science; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.01874076437711888,"score_gpt":0.2935272172979801,"score_spread":0.27478645292086123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W61967472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93914944,0.0008994346,0.000137136,0.041849628,0.00062869187,0.00063224806,0.0000059246127,0.00003615859,0.016661331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938824,0.00026872364,0.00028161934,0.004831364,0.00006238294,0.000015740867,0.000017656816,0.0000032356825,0.0006368533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869365,0.000116553616,0.00030129336,0.00022863837,0.00035316884,0.00030672434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946487,0.000049658625,0.00008131787,0.0000403764,0.00010388993,0.00025987954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060024654,0.0001031128,0.00019317606,0.000052479023,0.0007303883,0.000072950104,0.000064305554,0.000058354166,0.000025603065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006290044,0.000093594186,0.0000070513497,0.00017750783,0.000032901295,0.00032106185,0.000034051616,0.00013228833,0.0000033985436],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026718623,0.00016361689,0.058235064,0.00025637657,0.000018099714,0.000027417087,0.12821767,0.0000075046537,0.0005614813,0.4787292,0.009229204,0.32428718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011766827,0.00011914958,0.522511,0.005101236,0.0000045557954,0.000004690263,0.052561652,0.000046146597,0.00028800295,0.012686038,0.40469,0.0008108499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73207355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9326403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46604314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038068232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057852287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W623305902","doi":"","title":"Tort's Response to Surrogate Motherhood: Providing Surrogates with a Remedy for Breached Agreements","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Compensation (psychology); Honour; Law; Raising (metalworking); Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Liability; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.011760872157326581,"score_gpt":0.2784499502813309,"score_spread":0.26668907812400433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W623305902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9799541,0.0007586008,0.0038327114,0.010634781,0.00024891665,0.0016538874,0.000003467421,0.000088561945,0.0028249675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908098,0.00012332576,0.00023852548,0.00013884233,0.0006066882,0.0001149162,0.0000010491783,0.00003380372,0.007933038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961733,0.00030160192,0.00031336004,0.0002661426,0.0005359088,0.002409649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987617,0.000193516,0.00021774563,0.00012899014,0.00043073558,0.00026730006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049595926,0.00017474001,0.00024756897,0.00012378435,0.0009578465,0.00034945074,0.00038741116,0.00008641349,0.000065301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000585387,0.00013485017,0.00008567961,0.00037033868,0.000073625575,0.0006227965,0.000025758707,0.00048720004,0.00006224199],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015867982,0.0015099233,0.10052163,0.00030470788,0.0033122331,0.000037224974,0.1794823,0.0001732992,0.07156454,0.41209322,0.008180187,0.20695275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010890226,0.011279935,0.009656164,0.0009540785,0.00034021793,0.00025136056,0.27605775,0.00010915372,0.0033169594,0.4033388,0.2809548,0.0028505707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012861795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051283948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2727746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010510433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035760514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99371165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W63491074","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1013","title":"Family Arbitration: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Two step; Computer science; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Applied mathematics","score_opus":0.03947905874857221,"score_gpt":0.35346821104787823,"score_spread":0.313989152299306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W63491074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15334466,0.00060683046,0.00089433003,0.009374968,0.00052515196,0.00016484494,0.00000584541,0.000018401153,0.83506495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98292696,0.00011530407,0.00021279335,0.003667428,0.012318672,4.034704e-7,4.0401915e-7,0.000009041636,0.0007489902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850625,0.000102159116,0.00046204557,0.00008500079,0.00052442413,0.00032009807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990211,0.00007634092,0.000358885,0.00003943529,0.00031778452,0.0001864263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001613256,0.000090372145,0.0002863922,0.000084386775,0.00080153166,0.00016801941,0.00014736035,0.00012359,0.000029293904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000716815,0.00008196912,0.00011619987,0.00022473779,0.0003102715,0.00046115066,0.000019475885,0.00021000412,0.000013009964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052970106,0.000059379843,0.00022406396,0.000025836656,0.000047155918,0.000009419097,0.015615097,2.7914282e-7,0.00031815315,0.9764277,0.0016690666,0.0055508944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015774679,0.00024881432,0.0046028425,0.00007605691,0.00006296781,0.000012923622,0.012455589,0.0000012153987,0.00014399801,0.045486853,0.9350476,0.00028366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04450365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012415991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9333785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011583492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048852264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9618591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W646098464","doi":"","title":"Canadian Same Sex Relationship Recognition Struggles and the Contradictory Nature of Legal Victories","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.015473953943370993,"score_gpt":0.29283572922781415,"score_spread":0.27736177528444317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W646098464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6923911,0.0022244167,0.0000018434188,0.01082085,0.00015680779,0.00021178208,0.000015334188,0.000027599943,0.2941503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990512,0.00013568884,0.000016866317,0.00023141732,0.00028471756,0.0000055880378,0.0000035302728,0.000004489325,0.008805666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993317,0.00016191196,0.00010262521,0.0000892165,0.00016503877,0.0001495157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994741,0.0002564308,0.000047708007,0.00006317189,0.0000647679,0.000093787145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044971597,0.000053896292,0.00011297621,0.000029201385,0.00050775375,0.00006822073,0.000080655365,0.00012703941,0.00034649775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002748427,0.00004012151,0.000022795675,0.00016220135,0.0003790728,0.00016253436,0.0000032606965,0.00017414206,0.000009217585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001433566,0.00002088603,0.031165224,0.000065549306,0.00006196031,0.000006884558,0.3214111,0.0000045394822,0.000028478551,0.62003136,0.0064126393,0.020648032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007752147,0.00003116328,0.024497978,0.00008412821,0.00004297888,0.0000032250016,0.047592703,0.000011244939,0.000093924675,0.03743638,0.88922733,0.00020373614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7752219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7737202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8828147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057224617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036624007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39052826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6886020401","doi":"10.14288/1.0431101","title":"Climate discourse polluted : a cumulative effects analysis of the fossil fuel industry’s tactics to influence public discourse","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Fossil fuel; Leverage (statistics); Enforcement; Politics; Discourse analysis; Public policy; Culture theory","score_opus":0.02454525562120211,"score_gpt":0.33943100480322264,"score_spread":0.3148857491820205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6886020401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9755236,0.00013267098,0.000022769163,0.009416468,0.0004643804,0.0006384856,0.000116114716,0.00015176715,0.01353378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99795735,0.00002515391,0.000025384436,0.0004845796,0.00026381767,0.00006505066,0.000005515047,0.00001998824,0.0011531479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695474,0.00046876568,0.00044750606,0.00040292498,0.0009788208,0.0007472428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980183,0.00037214666,0.0003500772,0.00050820474,0.0003076547,0.0004435776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011718982,0.00021263206,0.000493233,0.00026210517,0.00095888553,0.0003287555,0.0007691354,0.0002691602,0.000080396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021598686,0.00015539803,0.00024875882,0.007427419,0.00063750864,0.00086221844,0.00028077504,0.00047121174,0.0001153947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009148803,0.00039619097,0.36159787,0.0003396945,0.0017273631,0.00005254227,0.047976587,0.0055981283,0.0014056566,0.57407296,0.0031948106,0.0035467255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011259873,0.00021520224,0.8980188,0.00074337993,0.0019537879,0.0000011360954,0.036263045,0.000659241,0.00086700334,0.008482037,0.050442055,0.0012283749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03384119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08302948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5655909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015882369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004561683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97259253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6903963152","doi":"10.13140/rg.2.2.35620.88969","title":"GRANDPARENTAL ACCESS TO GRANDCHILDREN -- A CASE COMMENT-- SIMMONS v. SIMMONS -- NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Nova scotia; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.06017104361776191,"score_gpt":0.3832810410472541,"score_spread":0.32310999742949215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6903963152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76604134,0.000094068324,0.00060131284,0.022001596,0.001107512,0.0011132695,0.00012540515,0.00010016977,0.20881535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998478,0.0000109887715,0.0000581301,0.00060918456,0.00039042035,0.000008824928,0.000005597869,0.000015519765,0.00042334522],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828625,0.00009177924,0.00037882436,0.00030655728,0.00047979248,0.0004567987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866515,0.00009369397,0.00027267687,0.00044298763,0.000191262,0.00033422312],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006070221,0.00017184587,0.0003837859,0.00009129558,0.0017522027,0.0006711664,0.0010217755,0.00011037344,0.00038984953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031030044,0.00014907161,0.00012585302,0.00019864865,0.00046872316,0.00078395585,0.00031615156,0.00012813394,0.00008466679],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032844138,0.0010758166,0.69772327,0.00018355009,0.00032773832,0.00061444956,0.027545637,0.00004008188,0.00034177976,0.05194618,0.20789094,0.011982139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014738509,0.0016156236,0.2881531,0.001666909,0.0008260046,0.00049710576,0.053842552,0.00019981418,0.009808193,0.010969556,0.61269027,0.004992373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5126231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5016972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40957013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054629672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018801709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6944112252","doi":"10.17613/46q0-d881","title":"The Development of Medical Marihuana Law in Canada and its Effect on Michigan Marihuana Statutes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Humanities Commons CORE (Modern Language Association / Columbia University)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; State (computer science); Legislation; Statute of limitations; State law","score_opus":0.02126222148385505,"score_gpt":0.24455150169706902,"score_spread":0.22328928021321398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6944112252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8851668,0.00011986518,0.0000019016239,0.00033961894,0.00016139027,0.00022359774,0.000036725967,0.00001896659,0.11393109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99368316,0.000035699275,0.000003690664,0.00008870865,0.000054332624,0.000002375643,0.000009730967,0.00000802175,0.006114289],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982527,0.00024930591,0.0002068041,0.0001616942,0.00082919706,0.00030028995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984448,0.00081974687,0.00035633842,0.0001692585,0.00012188883,0.00008799507],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092259154,0.00009524328,0.00023105733,0.00005227024,0.002965762,0.00031720774,0.000611989,0.000109182925,0.00008178346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005753798,0.000108328204,0.000031654174,0.000088971945,0.00017189083,0.0002365253,0.00017400854,0.0002163599,0.0000010602591],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012909272,0.0001279813,0.46942487,0.00018834465,0.00032762674,0.00033533174,0.11365308,0.0000034491427,0.00004400675,0.3934635,0.0016713988,0.020631341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003948677,0.00026591195,0.57064253,0.0009133949,0.00014267417,0.0000017610552,0.1643925,0.00030351616,0.0002549187,0.0032397942,0.2546964,0.0011979578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97688556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99995375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39022368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009805711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014373561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99833226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6949692895","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4144345","title":"ON~PUTLOCKERZ'S.!! WATCH 1917 (2019) ONLINE FREE FULL HD 123MOVIES kol","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Sign (mathematics); Adversary; Box office; Movie theater","score_opus":0.052021988481198544,"score_gpt":0.2781331971404015,"score_spread":0.22611120865920298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6949692895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0687245,0.000547183,0.0024650022,0.10150197,0.0006269621,0.0015133326,0.0012769497,0.0034257246,0.8199184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917874,0.00024344215,0.00016226819,0.0017727739,0.0014706057,5.564621e-8,0.00054195186,0.00084413367,0.0031774107],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759555,0.00041400664,0.00029334016,0.00044297677,0.0007771851,0.00047692715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849993,0.00005770832,0.0001282289,0.00034197193,0.00057905377,0.00039312767],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006622414,0.00015451846,0.00021389367,0.000074041476,0.0034145822,0.0008735285,0.0015247023,0.0000996997,0.010977949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035074002,0.0001522189,0.00006799192,0.00076897873,0.00029525196,0.00033799314,0.00080043095,0.00032713523,0.01041485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010615389,0.00015347773,0.000005598162,0.00006831394,0.000035728775,0.000021205004,0.012502106,0.00003355483,0.0007367554,0.044474587,0.9147068,0.027155712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036989895,0.00032296954,0.000075999356,0.00003427789,0.0000102457925,0.0000049713303,0.0022091062,0.00006162614,0.00009024011,0.0014571958,0.99517345,0.00018999742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010344683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004539345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92306286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011994389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019309653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99788284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980170452","doi":"","title":"Beetle 96 with Binyamin Geva Border Style 126 [Hebrew]","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Internet Archive (Internet Archive)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Honour; Hebrew; Term (time)","score_opus":0.010178201257656233,"score_gpt":0.27497932793764807,"score_spread":0.26480112667999184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980170452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019528554,0.0014100189,0.006986391,0.0005853185,0.0013401079,0.0012460746,0.0007037914,0.0005794789,0.98695356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028253186,0.00030169467,0.00097036024,0.0007972314,0.0019409597,0.00014370962,0.0002518709,0.00043849426,0.9669025],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952256,0.0006203621,0.0006921332,0.0013142993,0.0009907902,0.0011567893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769926,0.00045794417,0.00060548686,0.0006656323,0.000117202784,0.00045445224],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040173283,0.0008445289,0.0010654705,0.0008124451,0.00017026532,0.00043733334,0.0018348524,0.0003701749,0.023942556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020786571,0.0007256967,0.00035224517,0.00038730676,0.0012708657,0.00018012356,0.00062747207,0.0009732048,0.0025350333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001689079,0.00015660819,0.0006967985,0.0002536684,0.0004826282,0.00012374438,0.009843375,0.0000016075567,0.00001992212,0.024510456,0.96260643,0.0011358438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007229255,0.00029353713,0.00017419318,0.0025766492,0.00012791043,0.000008005177,0.00083955476,0.000052567924,0.00006370503,0.0020103916,0.9922674,0.0008632112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5050053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6163199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1113146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001320621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092855707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980241114","doi":"","title":"Beyond \"Restoration of Honor\": Compensating Veterans for the Psychological Injuries of the Gay and Transgender Bans","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Compensation (psychology); Sexual orientation; Stressor; Transgender; Veterans Affairs; Suicide prevention; Occupational safety and health; Identity (music)","score_opus":0.040300426216995915,"score_gpt":0.3204818410064792,"score_spread":0.2801814147894833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980241114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98188233,0.00075402454,0.00031622234,0.0035269216,0.0005539167,0.00067201816,0.00007585554,0.000019598741,0.012199096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991629,0.000015618907,0.00007725265,0.00036750402,0.00016108007,0.00005984906,0.0000016200393,0.000005737894,0.00014842434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989216,0.000252868,0.0002444647,0.0001352952,0.0003062732,0.00013952627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992882,0.00031731976,0.00015303104,0.00013086094,0.0000759029,0.000034678604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086922117,0.000064684864,0.00014916998,0.000012712163,0.0012893915,0.00004628094,0.00026845568,0.00004156911,0.00013424901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012427369,0.000040411684,0.000074599884,0.00019225282,0.00042855143,0.00012899248,0.0000368659,0.00014129862,4.934288e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017916081,0.00015888532,0.018974906,0.00012713393,0.000070189286,4.2277364e-7,0.056274336,0.00026162376,0.0062188804,0.911833,0.0018639439,0.0040375497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036696177,0.0018380801,0.1092703,0.00016689296,0.0003058623,0.0000073011,0.110177904,0.0003379576,0.005665542,0.15559301,0.612053,0.0009145408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006916916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008277014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75623995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002148808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000649088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981300162","doi":"","title":"1997 Economic Census: Transportation: 1997 Commodity Flow Survey: Remainder of Washington","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Rosa P: A digital library for transportation research (United States Department of Transportation)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metropolitan area; Commodity; Census; Remainder; Population; General partnership; Survey data collection; Principal (computer security); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.044313904194396805,"score_gpt":0.3154628959810611,"score_spread":0.2711489917866643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981300162","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019627683,0.00062441715,0.0004252894,0.00050571485,0.00028243003,0.0025398822,0.9730771,0.000329586,0.0025878495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12034746,0.00168534,0.00051716407,0.000050683146,0.00022402378,0.00027812575,0.8647486,0.00040390439,0.0117447],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947144,0.00034182094,0.0016703987,0.0008290152,0.0015402826,0.0009040796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99697125,0.0009119922,0.0009068503,0.00042163275,0.00034192193,0.0004463581],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082316523,0.0005736807,0.001090778,0.00093869364,0.00044160336,0.0002579429,0.00077872735,0.00061133807,0.0014836623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031857417,0.0006184279,0.0005159648,0.0015921467,0.00089576136,0.0017759505,0.0000030868787,0.00045801018,0.00002471615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010474293,0.0006336571,0.004058361,0.001898748,0.00053345104,0.000025083775,0.0048009395,0.00038709448,2.8619806e-7,0.008786898,0.97661537,0.0012127032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012714199,0.00034411318,0.0020767604,0.00057157286,0.00012460531,1.0487915e-7,0.0013336331,0.00007921946,0.00010934777,0.001905869,0.99160826,0.0005750644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016066455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04517715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10832855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008476693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093039585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981538359","doi":"","title":"Entre formalisme et intimisme: «Elle était belle comme une idée» de Normand de Bellefeuille","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Formalism (music); Chose; Compromise; Poetry","score_opus":0.005256073949682322,"score_gpt":0.18154415616071465,"score_spread":0.17628808221103232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981538359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011095498,0.0011135241,0.00006488586,0.010868466,0.0002716298,0.00032802086,0.00024400123,0.000033820077,0.9859661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25528583,0.0015689516,0.00030702283,0.002927682,0.0003541515,0.000016653414,0.000017744973,0.00011169562,0.7394103],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727553,0.00016367929,0.00029558988,0.00025601103,0.0014237945,0.0005854212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885947,0.00018177474,0.00030766425,0.0001832581,0.0000012523891,0.00046660224],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004350001,0.00026925508,0.0004081955,0.000039462397,0.0006765259,0.00006183021,0.00043110288,0.00013200936,0.0012241241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008304646,0.00026166398,0.000047517588,0.00012868686,0.00019726298,0.00031507842,0.00026375247,0.00024649693,5.5863747e-8],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059683854,0.00004211067,0.004077887,0.00050121424,0.00014325172,0.000071417126,0.0040839263,0.000020711785,0.0001350005,0.18552077,0.8034382,0.0019058596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002608471,0.000031135085,0.00042435937,0.00029276483,0.000027150636,0.000002995438,0.0066630878,0.000120555465,0.0005460597,0.0014236819,0.989886,0.00032135562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5460077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73496693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2541763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029897688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044605597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6984940627","doi":"","title":"Toronto, Ohio","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); New england; Government (linguistics); Portrait","score_opus":0.01013802528462007,"score_gpt":0.22858604850121866,"score_spread":0.2184480232165986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6984940627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000012907462,0.008325035,0.00010381702,0.0005733552,0.002454069,0.00048498233,0.00008833218,0.00050190004,0.9874672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02502593,0.040367745,0.0005229797,0.007178574,0.025023706,0.00007874105,0.0011969181,0.000308747,0.9002967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816483,0.00015381354,0.0004909357,0.00018267859,0.0003403262,0.0006673856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989023,0.000045862293,0.0004713514,0.00021796682,0.000020779748,0.0003417059],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025763197,0.0003081886,0.00038562654,0.00008607766,0.00041206437,0.00044451345,0.00033122976,0.0005933851,0.015341197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001371994,0.00028046686,0.00010009736,0.00021299742,0.00015209879,0.011495802,0.00014418496,0.0002539511,0.0003146973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009052413,0.000012154741,0.0001036832,0.00009090105,0.000026278678,3.3878788e-7,0.0007802459,8.370602e-7,2.1510234e-8,0.51260054,0.4785629,0.007813074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026245325,0.00001976189,0.00012190803,0.000390975,0.000019758063,0.0000016672351,0.00006571767,0.000009532346,5.958879e-7,0.00035183656,0.99841106,0.0003447605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049361508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036837754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5198481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029880985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000141069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987667048","doi":"","title":"Tort Vision for the New Millenium: Strengthening News Industry Standards as a Defense Tool in Lawsuits Over Newsgathering Techniques","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Journalism; Cynicism; News media; Sensationalism; Skepticism; Witness; Dozen; Government (linguistics); Politics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.02656282208526457,"score_gpt":0.37860359292139617,"score_spread":0.3520407708361316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987667048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5219175,0.0009765515,0.0024998025,0.012300469,0.0009090602,0.0023180058,0.000025154657,0.00033400138,0.45871943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901677,0.0001596228,0.00046736453,0.0003304279,0.0010426756,0.000046993606,4.0718854e-7,0.000018638993,0.007766178],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854904,0.00004996483,0.0002779493,0.00024822965,0.0005146895,0.00036013924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990754,0.0002053851,0.00018379137,0.0003254402,0.00012412778,0.00008586473],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013393777,0.00013505819,0.00020436688,0.00004015389,0.0014071175,0.0006814862,0.0005289745,0.00030147305,0.0001998668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013274144,0.00009230352,0.00008237539,0.00010140184,0.00013440027,0.0006453446,0.00011546763,0.00026071552,0.0000035838916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035458678,0.00011368158,0.03596414,0.00008856179,0.000079791906,0.000019816673,0.03091955,0.000016966002,0.0014110231,0.16767582,0.0977024,0.66565365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044142178,0.00009968666,0.0022434692,0.0002174635,0.00001458352,8.153551e-7,0.0050452896,0.000028991077,0.0011820467,0.007104502,0.9833814,0.00024032156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16757946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.111419946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.885679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015583658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007615999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987668490","doi":"","title":"Toronto Judge Rules Drug Law Constitutional at Time of Project Claudia Pot Raids","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Legislation; Constitution; Constitutional law; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.016366570909449936,"score_gpt":0.28686749373574977,"score_spread":0.27050092282629984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987668490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13846384,0.0014954146,0.000019538353,0.0005221402,0.0007486567,0.00045542727,0.000106595464,0.00013609596,0.8580523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824611,0.00003749909,0.00029089313,0.00065230683,0.0020115864,0.000026246013,0.00001757589,0.000013050651,0.0144897625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979645,0.00021490034,0.00038753616,0.00034102038,0.0006540036,0.00043801303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988818,0.00012397837,0.0001942444,0.00023505345,0.00036039678,0.00020449782],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087583036,0.00017137539,0.0003377694,0.00002429284,0.0013880337,0.00014413157,0.00038480654,0.0001566678,0.0033869857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021621064,0.00015546543,0.000120223376,0.00018128334,0.003796028,0.0007802874,0.000116825686,0.000113598006,0.0014071836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044369015,0.000060371945,0.0010900314,0.000039998748,0.000036763304,0.0000031309567,0.002946224,5.453761e-7,0.0007119377,0.96049744,0.0344706,0.00009861627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040004007,0.000083047744,0.0002813938,0.00011483531,0.000025042238,0.0000025394845,0.0006451058,0.000003583312,0.0016658725,0.006438543,0.9900791,0.00026091738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26708165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27451703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9556085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003488718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008338019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987815837","doi":"","title":"The Tobacco Damages and Health Care Costs Recovery Act: JTI-Macdonald Corp. v. British Columbia (Attorney General)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Health care; Public health; Health services; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.017267325668893517,"score_gpt":0.2933006148335574,"score_spread":0.2760332891646639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987815837","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6560167,0.016312491,0.00001626596,0.011631284,0.0010838526,0.0007204124,0.000037053982,0.00018131844,0.31400058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94828975,0.011016464,0.000056598084,0.0025722194,0.0008837916,0.000022160271,0.000009010214,0.000015741061,0.037134245],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838036,0.00017332078,0.00026975916,0.0002914115,0.00039701452,0.00048812237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991245,0.00014300946,0.00013381014,0.00015126455,0.00019661456,0.00025077743],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007567311,0.000092217364,0.0002157689,0.000013795768,0.0026916978,0.0018982183,0.0002640552,0.00010128423,0.0002855624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015806958,0.000100591846,0.00005146584,0.00028558428,0.0002583885,0.0003682029,0.00006833313,0.00013505435,0.000018266883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011394268,0.00003215547,0.259681,0.000029848088,0.000028542716,0.000023649398,0.0032362072,0.0000010067405,0.0000091442835,0.003908216,0.40801942,0.32501942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019609305,0.00007134495,0.081923604,0.00006319799,0.000005382209,0.000009565954,0.007407954,0.0000013916131,0.0000023087061,0.0004917922,0.9096569,0.00017047611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87776583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9769453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50163746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002627146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055079756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989218424","doi":"","title":"Appeals for Cuyahoga County and Eighth Appellate District","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Tribunal; Duty; Certification; State (computer science); Civility; General partnership","score_opus":0.01848183159256727,"score_gpt":0.29088567262962706,"score_spread":0.2724038410370598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989218424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15388487,0.043524105,0.0036062053,0.010425614,0.0055287797,0.002970917,0.0006353905,0.0013530251,0.7780711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99116737,0.0004290559,0.00009281115,0.0003323262,0.0015422059,0.00004653353,0.000010675414,0.000022039525,0.006357012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861795,0.00006612977,0.00023565641,0.00035712044,0.00032245772,0.0004006995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992851,0.00020235403,0.00005169863,0.00012856076,0.00008507185,0.0002472354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075381174,0.00013965648,0.00022012908,0.00003740119,0.000719029,0.0006666308,0.00018478777,0.00013373143,0.00014009514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001488382,0.000119305936,0.00008085568,0.0003036633,0.00022245928,0.0004492828,0.000039066515,0.00014827542,0.00017278585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017671982,0.000024681533,0.0010972248,0.00036266702,0.000048386508,0.000014540755,0.0013458156,0.000002475543,0.0001392776,0.96053004,0.030314295,0.0061029154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015967511,0.000037425667,0.0001950914,0.0001254121,0.000027144943,0.0000016616331,0.00043958577,0.000044565524,0.00010153126,0.020424161,0.97825986,0.00018387448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01610968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007121417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9479456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008545514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002131599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99044216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989932932","doi":"","title":"Coasting North: The Problem with the Jones Act for the Offshore Wind Industry and a Remedy from Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Offshore wind power; License; Turbine; Wind power; Submarine pipeline","score_opus":0.018490849914238258,"score_gpt":0.2540137610808956,"score_spread":0.2355229111666573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989932932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89306396,0.007949239,0.000045817633,0.07795756,0.00069192244,0.0016130093,0.0001346147,0.00010404785,0.018439827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99572384,0.0000323703,0.00002589331,0.0010725709,0.0016402567,0.00006967916,0.0000036725755,0.00001707246,0.0014146137],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987128,0.000112582675,0.0001631923,0.00024367447,0.00045105614,0.00031671562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984643,0.0010769673,0.00007675898,0.0001778861,0.0001009065,0.0001031918],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006862727,0.00013036064,0.00013963533,0.000007877765,0.0020768342,0.0006770404,0.00039269892,0.00009874536,0.000043966375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015027735,0.000055055214,0.000032481457,0.000310941,0.00036337634,0.00022543853,0.000060147177,0.0005248643,0.000003314789],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029570574,0.000084110434,0.27649993,0.0006478012,0.0014820682,0.00012432614,0.0941625,0.00065650436,0.00020193981,0.23556015,0.33495593,0.055329036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013151305,0.000031344738,0.009327234,0.00019534591,0.00007932365,0.0000026241728,0.015014569,0.00006151374,0.0000294762,0.0013161156,0.97365886,0.00015208757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9517917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6387029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071446826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001309833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990101384","doi":"","title":"Court Review: Journal of the American Judges Association, Vol. 58, No. 2","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Independence (probability theory); Judicial review; Judicial opinion; Supreme court; Publishing","score_opus":0.007592523473474518,"score_gpt":0.23228970374568148,"score_spread":0.22469718027220695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990101384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6264595,0.013570226,0.00014485764,0.1608806,0.0063942997,0.0013819166,0.00016671112,0.000093027746,0.19090891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725888,0.0027663023,0.00011873307,0.0013649159,0.0006446715,4.5283227e-7,0.0000014381126,0.000007143943,0.02250755],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832225,0.00042411455,0.0001633206,0.00009349159,0.00084746,0.00014938792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762064,0.00014066556,0.0011211897,0.000107331805,0.00094570854,0.000064436244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014245235,0.000053760934,0.00027383814,0.00005377611,0.0010869004,0.000013578534,0.0006485979,0.000026841944,0.0007370971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008443417,0.000052305582,0.00017113931,0.0007829035,0.00020021398,0.00018579107,0.00015585776,0.00021325122,0.0000144618025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003643918,0.00011547299,0.0724886,0.00009757661,0.000092173126,0.000008702114,0.0057771523,0.000020010204,0.00005218783,0.0016002222,0.91721797,0.0024934923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016982727,0.000086644155,0.017857358,0.000075513846,0.000057169116,9.1123366e-7,0.015444141,0.000004549595,0.0000025149145,0.0003038699,0.96593064,0.00006688832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010649223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003567405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34612933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004940206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057798397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99593896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991126884","doi":"","title":"Following Unprecedented Winter Storm in Texas and Protection Granted under the CCAA in Canada, Just Energy Receives Chapter 15 Bankruptcy Protection in U.S.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Storm; Energy (signal processing); Falling (accident)","score_opus":0.027086463160216446,"score_gpt":0.25951441044350626,"score_spread":0.2324279472832898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991126884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066406354,0.00555005,0.0005182483,0.009279767,0.0029177002,0.004125585,0.000009223475,0.00016156088,0.9110315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9149239,0.00026628724,0.000004680875,0.00017918485,0.00024473335,0.00014398765,0.0000039514216,0.000075140124,0.08415813],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807703,0.00034292712,0.00036528037,0.00043937113,0.00041900462,0.00035636796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999574,0.00003505365,0.00016222072,0.00013304848,0.000038828293,0.0000568512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051249535,0.00023143688,0.0003812692,0.00033366453,0.00013580582,0.00009989176,0.00016440508,0.00030184974,0.0007676813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000852896,0.0001790392,0.00005028635,0.0007599153,0.00008130518,0.00013948568,0.0000444303,0.00038034003,0.0000018979779],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017830337,0.0025386123,0.32111523,0.006010941,0.0025669388,0.0016648811,0.1763619,0.0010288238,0.006272673,0.09514568,0.07973397,0.3057773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025640344,0.00011332339,0.0552782,0.0069923764,0.000046926023,0.0000086431855,0.0726804,0.0003075848,0.00023249988,0.0014298616,0.8587603,0.0015858454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9989362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99996185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84851754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083860604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000785909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84055716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991452684","doi":"","title":"Guenther v. Ryerson Appellant's Reply Brief Dckt. 46258","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Work (physics); Period (music); Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.013858319489062758,"score_gpt":0.2653042816211919,"score_spread":0.25144596213212916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991452684","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16459861,0.0010271898,0.000022819888,0.00321234,0.0015404164,0.0005509532,0.000010455831,0.0002527955,0.8287844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9430793,0.00006674703,0.000066987384,0.0038947398,0.0014989373,0.000014963261,0.0000049948117,0.000031994008,0.05134137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977335,0.00019227932,0.00031971702,0.00047503912,0.0006789207,0.00060057937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988422,0.00012893237,0.00016662202,0.00041074614,0.00013576887,0.0003157212],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089114317,0.00018576838,0.000318187,0.000042915348,0.00052808085,0.00033089076,0.00047030032,0.00017553943,0.003902467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002618839,0.00017328897,0.00012970419,0.00035126045,0.0001964038,0.0005386813,0.00006946578,0.0002651178,0.0064418134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118247306,0.00020837552,0.058679283,0.0002231885,0.00012559316,0.000048515234,0.008793596,0.00002315136,0.00228852,0.7711292,0.1539537,0.0044086087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036048266,0.000054307715,0.000820503,0.00009061887,0.000012369619,0.0000018003315,0.0015486851,0.000005009628,0.00039403568,0.0027807043,0.99365485,0.00027664064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13138734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018224956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8397011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012460903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023048371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997026219","doi":"","title":"Troy Davis Faced Long Odds of Winning Reprieve","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Odds; Work (physics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Year-ending","score_opus":0.09231987947661377,"score_gpt":0.3163945917422137,"score_spread":0.2240747122655999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6997026219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24814337,0.00009463189,0.0025637913,0.00014607741,0.00017142725,0.00011430508,6.736263e-7,0.00006621101,0.7486995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994671,0.0000103343455,0.00028832327,0.0000634206,0.00012726309,0.000003365147,3.1041847e-7,0.000005222144,0.0048307995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999192,0.00005735218,0.00019547735,0.00013684153,0.00023536923,0.00018297187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957484,0.0000311992,0.000097871416,0.00011403425,0.00011296367,0.00006909315],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005029505,0.00005466604,0.00014052658,0.000028462598,0.00017387749,0.000026965665,0.00017363769,0.000067684225,0.0010587086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016445894,0.000045921104,0.000045126613,0.00023194759,0.0001405095,0.0002976403,0.000030924613,0.000052835934,0.000028847608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058598624,0.00016194378,0.13233636,0.000093524424,0.0000730743,0.000016870074,0.25770324,0.0000033715792,0.0021777358,0.59018445,0.0031460326,0.014044779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021373455,0.00078550196,0.26997554,0.00057377527,0.00016599624,0.0000057517686,0.2725281,0.000084840874,0.07440276,0.063383006,0.31397563,0.0019817248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07421765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004937894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7465276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019635678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014070488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997094726","doi":"","title":"Transmission and Transport of Energy in the Western U.S. and Canada: A Law and Policy Road Map","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Renewable energy; Plan (archaeology); Energy policy; Road map; Architecture; Wind power; Energy law; Energy (signal processing); Power (physics); Transmission (telecommunications)","score_opus":0.01580401760100098,"score_gpt":0.2600426619460496,"score_spread":0.2442386443450486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6997094726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9304371,0.0053631538,0.000018805336,0.009898075,0.00009540246,0.00021090824,0.000016923172,0.000016991811,0.05394264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978948,0.00019141161,0.000013096619,0.0013597743,0.00017189552,0.000006719063,0.0000014190862,0.0000057212596,0.00035511804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990476,0.00011884569,0.00018229926,0.00015590062,0.00030546664,0.00018993262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995818,0.00003865502,0.000047737627,0.000075136704,0.000041869014,0.00021478863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004986068,0.00008518264,0.00018488767,0.000022777538,0.000177549,0.000047528407,0.00011191829,0.00007287517,0.0000043202404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018910356,0.00006144815,0.00001262364,0.000120255485,0.00026239932,0.00020953218,0.000010835896,0.00008325405,2.5229886e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013100127,0.00009186099,0.0954625,0.0002526137,0.00003150888,0.000056394787,0.04409606,0.000005714859,0.00016305129,0.84538823,0.0012098802,0.013111191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079942355,0.00009896931,0.021526279,0.00014548312,0.000017333909,0.0000070892156,0.004057733,0.0000040724126,0.000101140366,0.007167886,0.96588075,0.00019381104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.996128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99526644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9646709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003849515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000547021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25057825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998503145","doi":"","title":"An act relating to the payment for funeral services performed by a transferring funeral home under a purchase agreement for funeral services or merchandise.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Portal to Texas History (University of North Texas)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Agreement; Funeral Rites; Service (business); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.025835061350692176,"score_gpt":0.24933339852712466,"score_spread":0.22349833717643247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998503145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80318046,0.0037675102,0.0025738261,0.008752175,0.0062595843,0.020466443,0.00466022,0.000642226,0.14969759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4728522,0.000094270064,0.00014986699,0.0010240948,0.00083054864,0.000027355836,0.0002611058,0.0001726622,0.52458787],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972675,0.00017100875,0.00036429559,0.0006825174,0.0007747458,0.0007399206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835664,0.0001120077,0.0004696546,0.00053793215,0.00015615502,0.0003676219],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008307861,0.0004467283,0.00070115266,0.00023643996,0.0011003799,0.00006970446,0.001533045,0.00023665292,0.00083712424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009695122,0.00033732597,0.00032197623,0.00031646734,0.00022130957,0.00040399912,0.00013188327,0.00025913413,0.00007338994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005722109,0.0015531563,0.031294722,0.0075980523,0.00273697,0.00004794673,0.27771768,0.0022425095,0.00019069009,0.0055106096,0.6408484,0.024537187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010211857,0.0006931661,0.005358549,0.00032321375,0.000316919,9.4015695e-7,0.005300704,0.00021018185,0.0000017428295,0.00002786082,0.986143,0.0006025156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12629332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.580015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45372167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054502353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052661746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000871551","doi":"","title":"Housing Authority of the County of Salt Lake v. John Thomas Snyder : Amicus Brief","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Salt lake; Appeal; George (robot); Salt water; Nova scotia","score_opus":0.01749259706006662,"score_gpt":0.27898481259905156,"score_spread":0.26149221553898494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000871551","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4320333,0.00015380896,0.000033955534,0.0008183976,0.00022716017,0.00016286536,0.000016224149,0.000035237696,0.5665191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99316096,0.00005132122,0.000041965628,0.00013082167,0.00021413263,0.0000015292225,4.1039462e-7,0.0000057711486,0.006393099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882,0.00013771623,0.000263305,0.00012601557,0.00045760223,0.00019536146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994519,0.00007125686,0.00012686056,0.00015508445,0.0001480164,0.00004690944],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063590467,0.0000694023,0.00018914492,0.00001601233,0.00034132166,0.00003315105,0.00025792964,0.000091985414,0.0009269413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011524374,0.000045382574,0.00007991501,0.0003900867,0.00037498272,0.00016044083,0.000026398218,0.00008569207,0.0000059701433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013464435,0.0007419268,0.18022051,0.00049842114,0.00016213914,0.000006896951,0.058155067,0.00016248976,0.0034101328,0.641231,0.03730835,0.0779684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031586998,0.00004216035,0.044398714,0.00013274878,0.000038373073,9.169219e-7,0.0025220413,0.000031715954,0.0034560484,0.0092713665,0.9395691,0.00022090759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07844796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09746413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9022608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025909909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027564456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010184151","doi":"","title":"Guenther v. Ryerson Appellant's Brief Dckt. 46258","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.013729893608641715,"score_gpt":0.26541531733287893,"score_spread":0.2516854237242372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010184151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18168843,0.0009675385,0.00002489521,0.0018552133,0.0014223843,0.00047809913,0.000009710985,0.00020775932,0.81334597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95265764,0.00006285851,0.000055117303,0.0017635252,0.0014013208,0.000013082075,0.000004533466,0.000028354221,0.044013567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796593,0.00016645376,0.00026821133,0.00039622653,0.0006302082,0.0005729919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902606,0.000112787864,0.00013186371,0.00031356778,0.000114696755,0.00030100174],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069397996,0.00017258634,0.00029079113,0.000039697312,0.00049097673,0.0003050807,0.00044108983,0.00019673872,0.0046086377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016653941,0.00016031414,0.00011717423,0.00031915618,0.00018468879,0.0004988669,0.000062512714,0.00024224758,0.007599556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007300744,0.00016729503,0.04836717,0.00017009451,0.00009364922,0.000029881323,0.006725591,0.000021000793,0.001965674,0.864334,0.074254036,0.0037986147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035792685,0.000045953733,0.00083973474,0.00007910333,0.00001147152,0.0000013051915,0.0015568559,0.0000054409074,0.00036796488,0.0029407989,0.99352825,0.00026519035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09969113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022719769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9192742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000112063666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002049739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7012996211","doi":"","title":"Richwood, Ohio","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Agency (philosophy); Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.008959358244449368,"score_gpt":0.2235847370523514,"score_spread":0.21462537880790203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7012996211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000024587973,0.0025637874,0.00013307361,0.001437212,0.0012898975,0.0005295151,0.00007525031,0.0006196733,0.99334913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021474535,0.033933807,0.000692864,0.01642232,0.017566072,0.000055090997,0.001403282,0.000290479,0.9081616],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805784,0.00016275152,0.0005508575,0.00023428838,0.0003869808,0.00060729054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889386,0.00004712,0.00051845686,0.00022845133,0.000024862247,0.00028724855],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023624669,0.00033450924,0.00043349515,0.00021945707,0.0004661613,0.0006117416,0.00038216315,0.0006149392,0.003507646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019868898,0.0003078807,0.000111437315,0.00049606175,0.00015426344,0.0063837343,0.00010478251,0.0003656228,0.0003093528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010863292,0.000013083194,0.00004763088,0.00006768279,0.00002166344,0.0000012405952,0.00047601928,0.000003864927,2.2863679e-8,0.45243979,0.5371907,0.009727451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034252583,0.00003884031,0.00013317652,0.0005246844,0.000017710983,0.0000021895905,0.000032816624,0.000021181111,7.060032e-7,0.0014193661,0.9970963,0.0003704993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000971852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006973014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4599056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016785112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001846372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7013055011","doi":"","title":"Toronto, Ohio","year":2009,"lang":"mk","type":"other","venue":"OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Government (linguistics); Geologist","score_opus":0.008719135659210588,"score_gpt":0.22145720696668203,"score_spread":0.21273807130747144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7013055011","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000018814488,0.00888361,0.00013930749,0.0017567364,0.00300856,0.0009476136,0.0001403232,0.00037936927,0.98472565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17217824,0.15548989,0.0008334518,0.034418993,0.03877664,0.00011451468,0.0028473446,0.00040333517,0.59493756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960241,0.00034402747,0.0013242947,0.0004811187,0.00066549826,0.001161009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773437,0.00010442502,0.00110635,0.00041318056,0.00006279232,0.00057886745],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044255555,0.00073076435,0.0008886121,0.00014067061,0.0009654422,0.0013893433,0.0007216779,0.0011173459,0.01866203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026759528,0.00067472446,0.00026303058,0.00055623933,0.0002840132,0.022099286,0.00025196368,0.00059518166,0.00079594715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006795511,0.000055289573,0.000109777655,0.00023652286,0.00008466106,0.0000029855555,0.002327509,0.000023510955,1.7438174e-7,0.62992,0.32548907,0.041682553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007521427,0.0001600728,0.00073818554,0.0012225044,0.000052628246,0.000006828051,0.00015281678,0.000158831,0.0000022224858,0.001436187,0.99453133,0.00078622234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027890113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028140438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6690423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000073280484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003315854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014701246","doi":"","title":"Recent Developments: Pridgeon v. Bd. of License Comm'rs for Prince George's County: Board of License Commissioners Was Statutorily Required to Hold a Hearing on Whether a Liquor License Should Be Renewed, Even Though the Protest Was Withdrawn Prior to the Hearing","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Baltimore Law Forum","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"License; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.049207764494861035,"score_gpt":0.3019725169418427,"score_spread":0.25276475244698166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014701246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75027966,0.00036628987,0.00094911753,0.20511265,0.0007172911,0.01056336,0.00030304276,0.00022115927,0.031487428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906087,0.00012920213,0.0023286259,0.0030049833,0.00012134809,0.000011440605,0.000008257072,0.00003127368,0.0037561476],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971971,0.00028306575,0.0004925831,0.00044304467,0.0009016468,0.0006825714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976407,0.00031613663,0.00050933566,0.00054930063,0.0006987259,0.00028579627],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016183374,0.00027331288,0.00056848757,0.0001239859,0.0013523204,0.000068689886,0.00087425846,0.00017185078,0.000022120425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037806926,0.00021150782,0.00015538346,0.0007780177,0.00039455557,0.0003237634,0.00026678143,0.00026810166,0.0000047559533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018428484,0.0034968564,0.018998051,0.001399301,0.0010876167,0.000067066896,0.51296633,0.0036840304,0.025148846,0.21772176,0.12191536,0.07508628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094088074,0.00073208066,0.0040885983,0.00085654936,0.000062181076,0.000001225527,0.017314386,0.00003874487,0.0032418172,0.00015584232,0.97225,0.00031768123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038119394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04382918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85033464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003726597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065871753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014955031","doi":"","title":"Searches and Seizures: The-Times-They-Are-A-Changin' or Technology Issue Avoidance, City of Ontario, Cal. v. Quon, 130 S. Ct. 2619 (2010)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UF Law Scholarship Repository (University of Florida)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Population; Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.027488240345517383,"score_gpt":0.24192800327988936,"score_spread":0.21443976293437197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014955031","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96569943,0.00082372257,0.000020138503,0.0017563021,0.0007551593,0.00039558654,0.000023121489,0.0000930104,0.030433549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796166,0.000036739057,0.00011307033,0.000064448745,0.00016727195,0.0000031907718,0.000001735744,0.000011983228,0.019984962],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977092,0.0004542316,0.00022628866,0.00039416505,0.0008326569,0.0003834345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859494,0.00019450358,0.00037664047,0.00038689512,0.0003035501,0.00014348883],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015486699,0.00016226077,0.00040752598,0.0001539872,0.003630349,0.00006878996,0.00090022193,0.00014545258,0.00041606888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001382837,0.00015833195,0.00011298189,0.0006611554,0.0011935205,0.0006166428,0.00046176295,0.00077433774,0.000006306548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015395487,0.0007078212,0.58584654,0.0007427236,0.00082854397,0.001941458,0.16418119,0.00010295032,0.0065417546,0.22675781,0.00832984,0.0024798373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012193206,0.0006109917,0.048901934,0.00022315864,0.00021496507,0.00013997033,0.1025903,0.000010478151,0.0034224926,0.007623217,0.83436894,0.0006742034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3520847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3303874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82603914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044967738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009546822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015726380","doi":"","title":"\"There's No Place Like Home\" DOMA Deportation: The Forced Expatriation of Bi-national Same-Sex Couples from the United States to Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital USD (University of San Diego)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; Hyporeflexia; TSG101; Diafiltration; Pretext; Articular cartilage damage; Proteogenomics","score_opus":0.01590776529561467,"score_gpt":0.22093716047150494,"score_spread":0.20502939517589028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015726380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915271,0.00015074576,0.000215792,0.0011208544,0.00018607327,0.00020615003,0.0003395508,0.000015928528,0.0062378105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987188,0.000021433356,0.000026632148,0.00016647861,0.00014908978,4.6995308e-7,0.00016892157,0.0000047029407,0.0007434676],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989802,0.000047280555,0.00012805955,0.00009826017,0.0005826282,0.00016355133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875623,0.00046830138,0.00021221318,0.00008817866,0.00039022145,0.000084875275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022949325,0.00007193862,0.00012605425,0.000038161605,0.00042391484,0.00005097895,0.00028544173,0.00004212447,0.00012688994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016882175,0.00005718122,0.00004478853,0.00041288545,0.00015789928,0.00047146602,0.000044812765,0.000049411843,0.000008177249],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062574534,0.00035013002,0.3618666,0.00013725487,0.00067949184,0.00001598856,0.4137685,0.0024555032,0.00039215217,0.035235543,0.17408974,0.010383346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070850697,0.000079029385,0.1598301,0.00008340651,0.00006648429,5.764448e-7,0.4052452,0.0003023855,0.000073921925,0.0017314929,0.4315343,0.00034459156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8764553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8476869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25744453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011860807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004151971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3260453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7016102733","doi":"","title":"Yes, Curbing U.S. Fossil Fuel Extraction Does Reduce Climate Pollution","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Fossil fuel; Government (linguistics); Renewable energy; Climate change; Energy policy; Energy source; Nothing; Climate policy","score_opus":0.02042270204422874,"score_gpt":0.30457160513571313,"score_spread":0.2841489030914844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7016102733","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41739482,0.01756304,0.00025642122,0.011564219,0.007722928,0.0006072577,0.000062695086,0.0007317961,0.5440968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99201965,0.0011965409,0.00024353625,0.00045666355,0.0022602626,0.000022402186,0.000010818817,0.000018373848,0.0037717572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979771,0.0002626522,0.00033484658,0.00039021208,0.00051475246,0.000520472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904853,0.00006345698,0.00017762807,0.00022473285,0.00024448146,0.00024119638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008291616,0.00014450155,0.00022394514,0.000037068163,0.0011985387,0.000474217,0.00018955015,0.00018446798,0.0005742479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040573525,0.0001276571,0.000107269254,0.00045883178,0.00016403364,0.0011242382,0.00005865493,0.00027288683,0.00033133113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007839436,0.00033079184,0.007884367,0.0005389395,0.00008637104,0.00015200401,0.0076286756,0.00006846271,0.031651884,0.92294055,0.007132026,0.021507528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031166468,0.000021786918,0.0022333192,0.00024601366,0.0000334646,0.000008483206,0.004843669,0.000011738447,0.005083376,0.011899246,0.97498095,0.00032629448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0320877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042288195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9678489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021522173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041594933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97518754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019129083","doi":"","title":"FRIENDS OF THE EEL RIVER AND CALIFORNIANS FOR ALTERNATIVES TO TOXICS v. NORTH COAST RAILROAD AUTHORITY AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF NORTH COAST RAILROAD AUTHORITY, et al., PLAINTIFFS’ CONSOLIDATED RESPONSE TO BRIEFS OF AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS AND REAL PARTY IN INTEREST","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Plaintiff; Supreme court; State (computer science); Nova scotia; Damages","score_opus":0.05139422025202575,"score_gpt":0.34990099180598105,"score_spread":0.29850677155395533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019129083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99591166,0.000034197088,0.000034435532,0.0012981364,0.00012399035,0.00081219745,0.0014807559,0.000008918325,0.00029573875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994804,0.00006905446,0.00013065082,0.000113860835,0.000013746598,0.000013990146,0.000007792452,0.000012353371,0.00015810214],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971745,0.00073405314,0.0009586935,0.0003494476,0.00049411244,0.00028920308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980269,0.0005619885,0.00044953948,0.0002041031,0.00051751145,0.00023995282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027156968,0.00018856132,0.0007739801,0.00028372076,0.0000700316,0.00002129454,0.0002965624,0.00010759173,0.0000052004784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001838297,0.00014959194,0.000057653597,0.00072431826,0.00093303015,0.00021386848,0.0003459937,0.00013758433,1.2296358e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035884904,0.00021510528,0.92047536,0.00013598493,0.00004359251,0.0000027599672,0.06940461,0.000009504149,0.0030324068,0.00069074746,0.0017766686,0.00062478025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001670275,0.00081840635,0.97508824,0.0002736209,0.000031179494,0.0000013457702,0.00813611,0.000030255547,0.008490293,0.00021286012,0.0050396277,0.00020779553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1675244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6399852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47246078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005063948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045853085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83801913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030076165","doi":"","title":"Lynn and Eileen Harding v. Pecan Ridge Partners, Atlas Title Insurance Agency, Scott Wilson, Jeremy Larkin, Scott Nielson, Randy Kidman, Dave White, and Roger Cater: Brief of Appellees","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ridge; Appeal; Atlas (anatomy); Nova scotia","score_opus":0.014616687968409365,"score_gpt":0.28349687182476796,"score_spread":0.2688801838563586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7030076165","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6279296,0.0022859273,0.000062122264,0.0018024794,0.0006938923,0.00045047788,0.00006774598,0.00009934612,0.36660838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98958254,0.00031836046,0.00011769798,0.00013282236,0.000389505,0.0000051380653,0.0000071279223,0.000015552861,0.009431285],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988267,0.00006166567,0.00023421226,0.00032909238,0.0002715343,0.00027683054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993088,0.00005837363,0.00012429495,0.00021454437,0.00014207751,0.00015188793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062516326,0.00013742331,0.00029123607,0.000052760217,0.00029000585,0.00014348776,0.00023893664,0.00012890599,0.0004334368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015745137,0.00011484548,0.00003046185,0.00023464694,0.00035377493,0.00036930208,0.00011120704,0.00015752205,0.00003801268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050922266,0.00011321316,0.7133464,0.0003837341,0.00013986332,0.000012245854,0.015793292,0.000001135589,0.0043008444,0.021717144,0.23392557,0.0102156205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069763704,0.000044576547,0.03275057,0.00008280808,0.000053226027,0.000005852952,0.0011171344,0.000034182052,0.0015156851,0.00074707373,0.9625614,0.0003898441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009821941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014163794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72863585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010216386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013198217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99677175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W70356315","doi":"","title":"Crossing the Floor, Conflict of Interest and the Parliament of Canada Act","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Conflict of interest; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.043856197623508175,"score_gpt":0.2820548642309233,"score_spread":0.23819866660741512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W70356315","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20795123,0.66220915,0.000004407137,0.069155395,0.0007001488,0.0023250664,0.00015432197,0.000011486168,0.057488777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857728,0.010039153,0.0000046821488,0.0036953818,0.0001336473,0.000019392715,0.000003821118,0.000006057313,0.00032505227],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987752,0.0002289578,0.0004021019,0.00011954456,0.00020618967,0.00026801814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992443,0.00012797088,0.00022467886,0.00017746456,0.00008104698,0.00014457987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010336884,0.000096049815,0.00033216848,0.000018064324,0.0005715009,0.00006382268,0.00028427268,0.000026580936,0.00021396304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010021997,0.000055146993,0.00005909533,0.00020094578,0.0009278819,0.00007479229,0.00002056442,0.00008646732,0.0000014301432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065402244,0.000065323016,0.039709404,0.0065776035,0.0003999619,0.00004629382,0.012580874,0.000013388262,0.000060407623,0.12950851,0.6972801,0.11369274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020882711,0.000010269343,0.002340267,0.0014815866,0.000062604755,0.0000019691079,0.0017213826,0.0000022156219,0.000038126833,0.00033070263,0.9937155,0.00008652347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99981546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7778216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022198356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029839743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52934426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7039325051","doi":"","title":"&lt;i&gt;United States v. Osage Wind, LLC&lt;/i&gt;: Wind Energy Being Blown Away by New Rules?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Oklahoma College of Law - Digital Commons (University of Oklahoma)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lease; Wind power; Honor; Nautical mile; Surprise; State (computer science); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.01080830846888219,"score_gpt":0.2020041316549408,"score_spread":0.1911958231860586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7039325051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6277723,0.00027450777,0.00045359973,0.0014093668,0.00018229474,0.00032367333,0.0021465246,0.00013307692,0.36730468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798239,0.00016968232,0.00036981943,0.000044177345,0.00011420052,2.7860352e-8,0.00020209854,0.000031098763,0.01924499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99686813,0.0002245418,0.0004292179,0.00062246085,0.0011231055,0.0007325664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966556,0.000410389,0.000821159,0.0005894115,0.00091962295,0.00060384034],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003964391,0.0004099884,0.0009964452,0.000569297,0.0018887543,0.00008831219,0.0017287842,0.00037127043,0.00062027806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000092322865,0.000566096,0.00045702895,0.0016021233,0.0040915953,0.0021284912,0.00069537235,0.00021979956,0.00003776263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017140692,0.0017697809,0.0032972787,0.0003187498,0.0011190178,0.0005329638,0.036884442,0.000052498293,0.0036959182,0.81581265,0.12914485,0.005657771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025810774,0.0007016099,0.0012243245,0.00032954162,0.00021432668,0.000008856932,0.018818378,0.000109651104,0.00045497948,0.0047976635,0.97007495,0.0006846456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050028764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0702517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8409301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003044564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007320626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043990833","doi":"","title":"UND Law Expert Participates in Task Force to Examine Impact of Violence on Native","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UND Scholarly Commons (University of North Dakota)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Tribe; Expert witness; Task force; Economic Justice; State (computer science); White (mutation); Witness; Indian country; State supreme court","score_opus":0.03391095217412572,"score_gpt":0.3063078121600432,"score_spread":0.2723968599859175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043990833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98172975,0.0002509599,0.00006947028,0.00054166594,0.000046670066,0.0003823113,0.00003556886,0.00002293079,0.016920667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99947625,0.000058168804,0.00009240435,0.0000771954,0.00002883655,0.0000017306155,0.000004623023,0.000006746422,0.00025405348],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998647,0.00022509633,0.00018183826,0.0002266504,0.00040287082,0.0003165796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998786,0.00024651407,0.00015940514,0.00022387998,0.00036237974,0.00022186279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036048863,0.00012371581,0.0003115556,0.00019499435,0.0004153867,0.00008847769,0.00055200054,0.000084540436,0.00013551606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021563515,0.0001287878,0.00009658363,0.00083438447,0.0003559392,0.0017566383,0.000119833916,0.00021314283,0.000053186126],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020292525,0.000695078,0.8906083,0.00004952622,0.00023228752,0.00002819435,0.05872474,0.00042411723,0.0011381139,0.032979533,0.0012357121,0.013681459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005608989,0.0006720854,0.9858986,0.000365482,0.000027310252,1.7828229e-7,0.006294064,0.000059416187,0.00013233496,0.0019963635,0.0037220106,0.00027122244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41011152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30714083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10297068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001874636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016450653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70550203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7066250321","doi":"","title":"H06-1637. Dethmers, John R. ( -2006). Papers, 1860-1944. 0.50 linear ft.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hope College Digital Commons (Hope College)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; George (robot); Square (algebra); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.021721234685970574,"score_gpt":0.2754955373950459,"score_spread":0.2537743027090753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7066250321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050467473,0.005118069,0.000058039554,0.004087655,0.0031006855,0.0018125252,0.0025045683,0.00063533644,0.93221563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94300056,0.00027153248,0.0001725664,0.00069226144,0.0026133424,0.00014891465,0.00008739988,0.00012873494,0.052884683],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99406,0.00043733962,0.0010841936,0.0007937872,0.0015420419,0.002082632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99600875,0.0008936351,0.000426706,0.0008384844,0.0005179347,0.0013144901],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013694661,0.0007258555,0.0010411638,0.00036050234,0.0026685058,0.0006899173,0.0013336714,0.00057532516,0.0009467064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012675867,0.00070278207,0.0004833259,0.0026040932,0.0009203544,0.0031389154,0.0005294348,0.0006848862,0.0014928111],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006052434,0.0021098845,0.046649117,0.0002775605,0.00050370494,0.00027070148,0.009308625,0.00003102524,0.00020629355,0.26546553,0.6647906,0.009781764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010348879,0.00017993884,0.0012581983,0.00014814922,0.00007392965,0.000027167338,0.0080383215,0.000018750132,0.00011029319,0.00042239088,0.98768365,0.0010042957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048043197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010389135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8925331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005650821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012156721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071058531","doi":"","title":"Reasserting Tribal Forest Management Under Good Neighbor Authority","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Stewardship (theology); Revenue; Woodland; State (computer science); Service (business); Resource (disambiguation); Federal law; State forest","score_opus":0.030301911089065436,"score_gpt":0.29080126848444293,"score_spread":0.2604993573953775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071058531","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08487135,0.00069307815,0.0012946118,0.019785894,0.0008978597,0.000776834,0.000013832953,0.00052626006,0.8911403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99308866,0.000040337956,0.00030808608,0.0025236118,0.0017424813,0.000028589786,0.0000052408577,0.000021104033,0.0022419149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997936,0.00017622222,0.00035049388,0.00040606945,0.0006075407,0.0005236528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989955,0.00007016548,0.00014440357,0.00017604281,0.00009832285,0.00051555684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006592629,0.00016444517,0.00025820042,0.00002299668,0.00094710663,0.00034266565,0.00042386953,0.00013898482,0.00033548466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024081126,0.00015846068,0.000109614695,0.000507557,0.0001311446,0.00052606507,0.00011871294,0.00026189757,0.00043967512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029006276,0.000044032655,0.010492611,0.00009074395,0.000044569486,0.000025054678,0.0012414104,0.000042439693,0.00003645901,0.98361206,0.0028181372,0.0015234833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085816975,0.0001100483,0.011577736,0.000119490236,0.000071711744,7.573579e-7,0.0071028657,0.000110091816,0.00009565652,0.030259062,0.9491889,0.0005055331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024541447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021522474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.953353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012602823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013848367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99633217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7111823523","doi":"","title":"Cardozo Law News Briefs: October 24, 2025","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Voting; Law enforcement; Section (typography); Economic Justice; Enforcement; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.01788095228372889,"score_gpt":0.2880913055025515,"score_spread":0.27021035321882264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7111823523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011173239,0.02073634,0.0001132222,0.012651338,0.010973915,0.0012883837,0.000086137756,0.00030288025,0.9426745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86433995,0.0012757444,0.000094133546,0.0154771,0.0038334285,0.00009222215,0.000012994862,0.00005630715,0.11481811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99329543,0.0007773336,0.0014214695,0.001434047,0.0013733229,0.0016983964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966014,0.00038559048,0.00045803512,0.0010316056,0.0006375234,0.0008858219],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014557366,0.00073960243,0.0012670702,0.00014323049,0.0033413756,0.0018413687,0.0015128484,0.00091721216,0.0030188614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006292251,0.00075905235,0.0006090185,0.0022398639,0.0015936331,0.0016562671,0.0004958694,0.0011889625,0.003135266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051699957,0.00019579082,0.003349473,0.00032738672,0.00024461074,0.00003757682,0.001991481,0.000013928225,0.00015811926,0.864235,0.12696211,0.002432866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000920113,0.000085025444,0.00042852433,0.00077867194,0.00021816464,0.0000016995881,0.0032721965,0.000011183536,0.00046299832,0.032568645,0.96046877,0.00078400044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57368857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3715655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8531667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005458649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019181061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132996695","doi":"","title":"The Search for a Model System which Balances Freedom and Respect for End of Life Decisions and Strict Regulation to Protect the Vulnerable from Abuse","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Charter; Supreme court; State (computer science); Value (mathematics); Human rights","score_opus":0.038226712707314876,"score_gpt":0.360749716669592,"score_spread":0.3225230039622771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132996695","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9761781,0.0031909775,0.005655951,0.0024966171,0.0007202829,0.0062229945,0.00018996513,0.000050387247,0.005294699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99424,0.0002206547,0.0008341296,0.000009562105,0.0005725178,0.00058174663,0.000029104764,0.000021546824,0.0034907407],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984851,0.00024017094,0.00027708407,0.00030021093,0.00045218717,0.00024526505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99529713,0.0034831036,0.00024389282,0.00022063468,0.00064953376,0.000105685016],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028091478,0.00013962414,0.00029814924,0.000045171313,0.0022374906,0.00031014052,0.000287169,0.00024831202,0.0000030113117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003029784,0.000083745,0.0000485716,0.0002840946,0.000098501405,0.00010412885,0.00001818621,0.00025994316,5.678185e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0059671085,0.000097932054,0.0005540416,0.0019348371,0.0004393742,4.9500824e-7,0.7751936,0.0035872986,0.012417169,0.15891872,0.013033818,0.027855646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032719923,0.00094467285,0.0075382465,0.0035552338,0.00056511,0.0000010929864,0.76123095,0.08631221,0.0054428927,0.026738727,0.102931924,0.001466974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03928586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1909328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15164693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039787777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051311735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99906147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W77181116","doi":"10.29173/alr194","title":"Recent Judicial Developments of Interest to Oil and Gas Lawyers","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Energy law; Tort; Law; Judicial review; Fossil fuel; Political science; Economics; Agreement; Law and economics; Environmental law; Business; Liability; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04709673265114857,"score_gpt":0.3299872905711445,"score_spread":0.28289055791999596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W77181116","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08500805,0.024731636,0.0000010850057,0.030620154,0.001236332,0.0003667185,0.000003381675,0.000025040705,0.8580076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8570672,0.13418333,0.0001879126,0.006032833,0.00033290326,0.000040335024,0.0000033243928,0.000016318692,0.0021358253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990696,0.00007188046,0.0003077709,0.00017824906,0.00016961546,0.00020290958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934024,0.00011572481,0.00011116203,0.00012055151,0.00013736646,0.00017495817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058331,0.00009071315,0.0002984872,0.000017142447,0.00019230443,0.000032221033,0.00020027802,0.000060766037,0.000300551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008168938,0.000076250864,0.00003385274,0.0002634254,0.00016807168,0.00012476929,0.000064141044,0.000103182334,0.000087595305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063718144,0.00003788452,0.00069499976,0.00091384054,0.000024011384,0.0000013448853,0.0021432778,9.64527e-9,0.0001946227,0.5065684,0.0049016452,0.48451364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005703858,0.00001558386,0.000082144885,0.001392278,0.000019148822,0.0000010296578,0.000041544918,3.3741063e-8,0.00007740836,0.00048148193,0.9977338,0.00009854789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07864302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46821582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9928321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017398173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013869238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9274924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W79238141","doi":"","title":"Council of Canadians and CUPW v. the Attorney General of Canada - In support of the Applicant: Affidavit of M. Sornarajah","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TDM","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.016147513900933937,"score_gpt":0.22709230520229426,"score_spread":0.21094479130136032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W79238141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94630027,0.00034324982,9.742023e-7,0.0026337674,0.00007121967,0.00018406032,0.0000773047,0.0000015923913,0.050387572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855196,0.000024007435,0.0000065754552,0.00016413999,0.00008907447,0.0000037081068,2.7108933e-7,0.00000342317,0.0011568185],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989865,0.000050303617,0.00025807295,0.00007408846,0.00047664673,0.00015442834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994258,0.00005771047,0.0001903153,0.00012067663,0.00015834438,0.000047097674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006005226,0.000049515416,0.00018484784,0.000012026445,0.00007720356,0.0000034170216,0.00022601333,0.000038649858,0.000046798294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010169242,0.000031386713,0.000025271544,0.00021119534,0.0003239747,0.000037391645,0.000022224516,0.00005234627,1.2945245e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013168338,0.0003407212,0.3449421,0.0009053406,0.00019510098,0.000009483189,0.2551795,0.0015558865,0.014629646,0.17983176,0.1894829,0.012795894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005517065,0.000069621674,0.06340641,0.00009241809,0.000037398997,0.0000019191996,0.0075017055,0.00005497763,0.0077072796,0.0007308139,0.9196522,0.00019351278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9942569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73016936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021196246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006186816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W80058807","doi":"","title":"Council of Canadians and CUPW v. the Attorney General of Canada - In Support of the Respondent: Affidavit of J. Crawford","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TDM","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Respondent; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.019843222348233863,"score_gpt":0.23986387751023402,"score_spread":0.22002065516200017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W80058807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95465195,0.0003251298,4.0388412e-7,0.002698858,0.00012476755,0.00013418075,0.000061208004,0.0000013103679,0.042002197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99514675,0.000021987187,0.00000547933,0.00016028152,0.00007535267,0.0000019542101,2.5668834e-7,0.0000032104358,0.0045847073],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988945,0.000079580364,0.00026707162,0.00006873476,0.0005408328,0.00014927937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938,0.00007689155,0.00018585005,0.000121051446,0.00019187332,0.000044361852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008393812,0.000046590372,0.00016793993,0.000017432052,0.000078125064,0.0000042309557,0.00022331871,0.000039611416,0.0000676292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024878624,0.000029672856,0.000025613148,0.00023495962,0.0002827856,0.000051791252,0.000023750856,0.00005092665,1.1799062e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027143946,0.00024493792,0.36019337,0.0006751335,0.00015436996,0.000012881657,0.3077227,0.00093730254,0.011185027,0.10720403,0.20548363,0.005915198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004817716,0.00007501223,0.0938264,0.00009459775,0.00002805901,0.0000014282058,0.006368553,0.000024506318,0.0053689396,0.00061419164,0.89297575,0.00014078943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9932138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68749213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002551668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075003174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W82309015","doi":"10.1017/s0098858800011163","title":"Rights Discourse and Assisted Suicide","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Law & Medicine","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Assisted suicide; Constitutionality; Political science; Legislation; Law; Constitutional right; Criminology; Supreme court; Psychology","score_opus":0.03345275892712883,"score_gpt":0.37419583861469624,"score_spread":0.3407430796875674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W82309015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80389315,0.002210978,0.00023885211,0.025785264,0.00053907436,0.000087828616,8.2437094e-7,0.000019238205,0.1672248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99651814,0.00034130015,0.000080468715,0.0008222876,0.0017649395,6.014295e-7,2.8807636e-7,0.000006165696,0.00046581592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986322,0.0001603934,0.00037059674,0.000093556635,0.00052166055,0.0002215889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875027,0.00018602614,0.00047762546,0.000070873,0.00021583315,0.00029938648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009157706,0.00008751146,0.00040103323,0.000062201776,0.00032744362,0.000026545857,0.00016404704,0.00002580573,0.0001316281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018244828,0.00005529478,0.000040850227,0.00032179736,0.002180461,0.0002487426,0.00000881711,0.00015670249,0.0000031489185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006485264,0.0003721155,0.070604496,0.000046825557,0.00044081488,0.0018878012,0.101654984,0.0000052270652,0.002047972,0.4830886,0.013121189,0.32608142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011442421,0.0014323264,0.011500529,0.0005924395,0.0001605962,0.00044533907,0.025816927,0.0000020463258,0.000034671328,0.006448703,0.95220214,0.00022006602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07050675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009515579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93908095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042374617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010421633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93568283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W824533568","doi":"","title":"Interpretation & The Internet, 28 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 251 (2010)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); The Internet; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.022178969518380547,"score_gpt":0.282027364190812,"score_spread":0.2598483946724314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W824533568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6096984,0.000079781785,0.000735772,0.0026658315,0.0026895301,0.00074758177,0.000008610394,0.000076324635,0.38329816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834388,0.000042687396,0.00023825438,0.0003670147,0.000510273,0.0000017710686,0.0000071440422,0.000011728147,0.015382366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837697,0.00024755145,0.00026842812,0.00037784735,0.0004592359,0.00026995377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984662,0.00018333585,0.0004399274,0.0004206082,0.0003324911,0.0001574165],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065417605,0.00015435889,0.00029924794,0.000046389363,0.0015710513,0.0008441785,0.0035753949,0.0002052599,0.0006124334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004116127,0.00013275983,0.00013544271,0.0002876347,0.0010001237,0.0023353652,0.00177763,0.000382334,0.00006537507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00142755,0.0009263247,0.09676708,0.00043352225,0.00096079154,0.00027482116,0.2149981,0.00020210624,0.01090728,0.50141865,0.14061914,0.03106463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010268148,0.00013307056,0.041990712,0.00020491522,0.00013715746,0.00002261297,0.0038129713,0.0012687341,0.0023972848,0.002240815,0.9461355,0.0006293823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21205957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16686419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80551636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012819777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020627072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W825083229","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1030","title":"Human Dignity and Ecnomic Integrity for Persons with Disabilities: A Commentary on the Supreme Court's Decisions in Granovsky and Martin","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Supreme court; Law; Sociology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.056901249944821375,"score_gpt":0.35657258113704027,"score_spread":0.2996713311922189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W825083229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9214747,0.000059692768,0.000010322812,0.075916186,0.000027360724,0.00019465394,0.000020992176,0.0000035174621,0.0022925802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965914,0.000047846457,0.000021602902,0.002550289,0.00075363374,0.000004819887,3.8194852e-7,0.0000054707484,0.000024552779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992357,0.000116333926,0.00021443669,0.000083124294,0.0001721315,0.00017830983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993783,0.00031906247,0.00012320784,0.000032910655,0.000061144965,0.00008536417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008468929,0.0000803253,0.00021397664,0.000043724016,0.0012400317,0.00013653575,0.00008527084,0.00006461347,0.000002905986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020006129,0.000049687158,0.0000437723,0.00007597425,0.00079322886,0.00019556127,0.000021457266,0.00022724175,9.931638e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016275549,0.00017385343,0.006441268,0.000032821183,0.00004197189,0.0000028444845,0.1598054,0.0000011217104,0.000051169958,0.8307425,0.0017323369,0.0008119654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0050366386,0.0013826855,0.030612705,0.0005048724,0.00009972415,0.000018979412,0.2537164,0.0000032755095,0.000047893696,0.66590303,0.04226726,0.000406541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07558373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07071305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16483948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012481383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017119416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9537446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W834402394","doi":"10.29173/mlj873","title":"AB v. Bragg Communications Law's Next Steps: Should Bullying Be a Tort - Or Even a Crime","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.16458486171092718,"score_gpt":0.36104551122936257,"score_spread":0.1964606495184354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W834402394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08774865,0.0028387345,0.00023574321,0.029623337,0.0018117452,0.0011554294,0.000013571518,0.00027234558,0.87630045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938279,0.0003384703,0.0005710953,0.00279593,0.0017175493,0.00004303719,0.000002152921,0.000025731846,0.00067816814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978436,0.0003365459,0.00047963328,0.00017648995,0.00065574073,0.0005079389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983795,0.00022451379,0.0002641079,0.00038753945,0.00041580413,0.00032848382],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009228426,0.00016131395,0.00027012546,0.00005032196,0.0040308363,0.0015916864,0.0010899055,0.00015244565,0.0010540141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001831836,0.00012822774,0.00011943459,0.00025064766,0.00044851148,0.0015520906,0.00018254171,0.00054572,0.00026325491],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042080366,0.00034518834,0.0018633713,0.00006764862,0.00018445413,0.00006998349,0.014923474,0.0000047874205,0.0004350287,0.91698456,0.040960923,0.024118524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032946334,0.00008627215,0.00072612223,0.00015754598,0.00004365884,0.00007558865,0.07008102,0.000021079677,0.000032559383,0.010065221,0.9181028,0.00027866874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.567032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6330729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9069193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002202331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002802593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W88627892","doi":"10.29173/alr80","title":"&lt;i&gt;Daniels v. Canada&lt;/i&gt;: The Inevitable Comes to Pass, At Last","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Law; Economics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01316486980816561,"score_gpt":0.2537119165509631,"score_spread":0.24054704674279748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W88627892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005016353,0.1317142,0.0000027191652,0.122724414,0.00091488473,0.0023984362,0.000011456801,0.000047299538,0.7371703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8724815,0.02130291,0.000019057085,0.03429701,0.00070104375,0.0004048186,0.000010202754,0.000037429745,0.07074603],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976852,0.00029615904,0.0004619851,0.00032072462,0.0006284439,0.00060749025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820983,0.0006139678,0.00017615898,0.0004320824,0.00023902956,0.00032889904],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067664596,0.00021321348,0.00053034915,0.000013297336,0.0011130006,0.00017351106,0.000692571,0.00007526462,0.0020058535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070657354,0.00013750458,0.000107775064,0.0005679976,0.00016940254,0.00034926904,0.00017022634,0.000108508546,0.0014249559],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.619831e-7,0.000016383692,0.00031611763,0.00044304086,0.000030369345,0.0000019684705,0.000524643,7.54826e-7,0.00007567306,0.26979354,0.7267135,0.0020830953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055032087,0.000016929695,0.0004412945,0.0009765896,0.00004106896,0.0000021434578,0.000035987967,6.1962487e-7,0.000014717993,0.00031797308,0.9978835,0.00021412439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9685717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86746514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025450537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056554243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W88914411","doi":"10.7202/1068173ar","title":"LEARNING FROM THE YEAN AND BOSICO CASE: CAN THE REPARATION MEASURES ORDERED IN THE GUAYUBÍN CASE REALLY PRODUCE POSITIVE CHANGES?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Human rights; Political science; The Republic; Psychology; Law; Sociology; History; Epistemology; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03182424916457292,"score_gpt":0.2815330104807199,"score_spread":0.24970876131614697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W88914411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82635283,0.00050953386,0.00008058176,0.15305683,0.00019771799,0.0005849581,0.000047482015,0.000036340538,0.01913374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99568504,0.0001393223,0.000011939419,0.0022966957,0.001608542,0.00004907532,0.000017639684,0.000009107468,0.00018264262],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998653,0.00045195807,0.00018166918,0.00023769376,0.00031444427,0.00016125775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990752,0.0004487058,0.00015131486,0.00010945258,0.00016330677,0.000052052008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010123802,0.00008858279,0.000106055915,0.000020919826,0.00061427994,0.00027566878,0.00029889343,0.000056040568,0.000020885545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001517591,0.00005777345,0.000033055698,0.00022075514,0.00011944268,0.00012413936,0.000034263387,0.00027678534,0.0000043563086],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014955977,0.000073131225,0.008209882,0.000028515382,0.0001532134,0.004633542,0.86276233,0.00032184125,0.00049972633,0.09548388,0.0036251207,0.024059268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001351884,0.00046284468,0.021789735,0.0005439413,0.00024277416,0.006536789,0.28053626,0.0070038796,0.00031579152,0.01515141,0.66513324,0.0009314635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3538505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6853256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6615081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013048215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022136449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65045226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W889274989","doi":"10.58948/2331-3536.1358","title":"Fleeing Cuba: A Comparative Piece Focused on Toro and the Options Victims of Domestic Violence Have in Seeking Citizenship in the United States and Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pace international law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eleventh; Citizenship; Political science; Domestic violence; Refugee; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Environmental health","score_opus":0.055198785593370145,"score_gpt":0.3507085574064305,"score_spread":0.2955097718130603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W889274989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8135695,0.06754306,0.000085379645,0.042616896,0.00039731295,0.001829373,0.00004558134,0.00001739079,0.07389552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890031,0.009757069,0.0000146966895,0.0011299278,0.00003525999,0.00003369452,0.000004202462,0.0000021355124,0.000019898182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988392,0.0004228774,0.00021225339,0.00009895326,0.00033291845,0.000093784314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867,0.0009728067,0.0001205019,0.000053881824,0.00014868681,0.000034167726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013849492,0.00006303582,0.00018857299,0.000027003756,0.00010068009,0.00004941438,0.00016225291,0.000016446329,0.0000042839342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005664272,0.000037371672,0.000013231844,0.0001804331,0.00021792087,0.0000698197,0.00002483912,0.0001062392,4.985109e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004608421,0.000026254686,0.00878307,0.00023667577,0.000029316489,0.0000128910115,0.017163368,0.00020678998,0.000001917288,0.9724995,0.00040291352,0.0005912311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009246665,0.00038562808,0.032113373,0.08724395,0.00027144566,0.00007190429,0.107132636,0.010806718,0.000051322226,0.20322955,0.5480007,0.0014461359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8674363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9205858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76926994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109744025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015323305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15239726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W89025490","doi":"10.21991/c9zm2m","title":"Drivers Needed: Tough Choices from Alberta v. Wilson Colony of Hutterian Brethren","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.031467329142535354,"score_gpt":0.26442471498762216,"score_spread":0.2329573858450868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W89025490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.115417145,0.0011763078,0.010789841,0.005332563,0.0052988166,0.0011600781,0.0006545429,0.00024965112,0.85992104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968251,0.00009218171,0.0007543495,0.00079143135,0.0004159149,0.00005012035,0.00008644294,0.000011253273,0.00097321835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971697,0.00013228804,0.00071529,0.0005346743,0.0006884081,0.00075964653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817485,0.0002839343,0.00043447496,0.00031854832,0.000453952,0.0003342228],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037010675,0.0003170111,0.0005118258,0.00018578461,0.0017250828,0.000100518984,0.0006478812,0.00036097813,0.0016720869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006296615,0.00031830184,0.00024017708,0.00052297604,0.008630218,0.0013232348,0.00015389638,0.0002321332,0.00023483581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008748194,0.00013236189,0.048844613,0.000019234589,0.00012111551,0.000011385788,0.002866515,0.000017292014,0.00029933482,0.9427836,0.004294891,0.0005221814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023491504,0.0001880741,0.004175564,0.0006001938,0.00021781953,0.000026807422,0.0314177,0.000058248996,0.0029696452,0.07412757,0.8827519,0.0011173359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20901993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056154754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8814079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000219025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022987367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W93319703","doi":"","title":"Abortion Law in Transnational Perspective: Cases and Controversies - Introduction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Law; Political science; Abortion law; Adjudication; Human rights; Economic Justice; Reproductive justice; Constitutional law; Sociology; Family planning; Population","score_opus":0.00582589689883734,"score_gpt":0.27038075956008767,"score_spread":0.26455486266125033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W93319703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8628788,0.004367239,0.0026368222,0.10435168,0.0007554263,0.00027414493,0.000002436421,0.000056397555,0.02467704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973706,0.0006745195,0.0000064477786,0.000110118766,0.0015498932,0.0000023721718,7.039892e-7,0.0000046230584,0.00028074766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986838,0.0001642583,0.00014136807,0.00012413476,0.00023438944,0.00065205694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995688,0.00014156231,0.00007251352,0.000028487393,0.00014419292,0.000044446148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019264692,0.00005947681,0.00011016731,0.00006854771,0.00046142968,0.00008615761,0.00006184732,0.00005250831,0.000020597075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003775551,0.00005613935,0.000027501432,0.00014329742,0.00014634329,0.00047585327,0.0000038276708,0.00044854445,0.0000015468868],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027546994,0.000018060844,0.00089575636,0.0000020732125,0.000012354935,5.876489e-7,0.0017106918,0.000008024581,0.000061304236,0.99596566,0.000037531252,0.0012604119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007312753,0.0002086336,0.00207379,0.00000796345,0.000017175527,0.00009195971,0.0418309,0.000018982093,0.000025915055,0.8828517,0.07200881,0.00013289253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011366228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17441869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16305247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007881555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067975366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99521714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W933989094","doi":"","title":"Moral Issues of the Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Divergent/Convergent","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02512600169301227,"score_gpt":0.29502739143357126,"score_spread":0.269901389740559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W933989094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8360581,0.00052050216,0.0000054166076,0.0044670682,0.010578382,0.00042465737,0.00002699114,0.000078178666,0.14784074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935263,0.00008147031,0.000026057844,0.0002650012,0.000593199,0.000010156403,0.0000015164818,0.0000094736715,0.0054868283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985763,0.00009748381,0.00025719072,0.00018766073,0.00058532046,0.00029604923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992335,0.000026330968,0.00014989244,0.0002706273,0.00018621075,0.00013343515],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043320155,0.00010874812,0.00017610246,0.000022210876,0.0006121926,0.000041916053,0.000560474,0.000104349296,0.00274245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001407987,0.00007742421,0.00015764665,0.00027012176,0.00048991485,0.00018185667,0.0001446908,0.00017147756,0.00015594126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009352636,0.00010182891,0.13859639,0.000033880748,0.00003924394,0.0000018865092,0.008997809,0.0000017554149,0.0048749675,0.8359051,0.011058666,0.0003791504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020388515,0.00002636483,0.01652813,0.000022124272,0.000030247804,4.720409e-7,0.0018499215,0.0000059731697,0.017958023,0.0103439,0.9528368,0.00019414023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06937745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023566449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9417781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025112193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013422474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W95103866","doi":"","title":"Is the End of the War in Sight: An Analysis of Canada’s Decriminalization of Marijuana and the Implications for the United States “War on Drugs”","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decriminalization; Sight; Political science; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.018129716369439594,"score_gpt":0.28251902145048485,"score_spread":0.26438930508104524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W95103866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9625485,0.00080557127,0.00021874624,0.032842636,0.000072732386,0.00091516896,0.00013755671,0.0000068350664,0.0024522347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99885166,0.00020340421,0.000010199051,0.00079019094,0.000033398344,0.000031007872,0.000010280253,0.0000051189195,0.000064724285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989145,0.0002187871,0.00030354047,0.00012275277,0.00029817264,0.00014226463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984959,0.00066184514,0.000268207,0.00029951826,0.00023490978,0.00003961545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009151873,0.00007162818,0.00019393381,0.00005008127,0.00061147514,0.000022087355,0.00041391872,0.000040148883,0.000019205256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028917775,0.000032769574,0.000073514566,0.0010940756,0.0005952559,0.000084419626,0.000029403229,0.000075000775,9.7539434e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010327918,0.00009946623,0.017395524,0.00006315264,0.00034497166,1.0646517e-7,0.08185538,0.012392011,0.0001111027,0.88649654,0.00058831496,0.0005501437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036119504,0.0002644985,0.4106017,0.0003534608,0.002994057,6.593083e-7,0.24370211,0.004754193,0.007596435,0.2058943,0.119637035,0.00058959343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9637072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97321445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68060225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007848439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052520743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47030342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W9841700","doi":"10.29173/alr56","title":"Canada's Next Step in Tobacco Control Laws: Is Plain Packaging Legislation a Viable Proposal?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislation; Law; Tobacco control; Order (exchange); Business; Perspective (graphical); Division (mathematics); Political science; Mathematics; Medicine; Public health","score_opus":0.013340609130144855,"score_gpt":0.26020956365946507,"score_spread":0.24686895452932023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W9841700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005308601,0.09945271,0.000042315198,0.15476269,0.0006410148,0.005815996,0.000013265822,0.000063150765,0.73390025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97440463,0.0037684257,0.00003429167,0.018682176,0.00021856956,0.00019202322,0.000004970934,0.000015564974,0.0026793398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805814,0.0004253485,0.00043721934,0.00025798986,0.00039390512,0.00042740008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989778,0.0003693909,0.00017879164,0.00019348026,0.00014542212,0.00013514463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009083748,0.00014416833,0.00042635662,0.000018982691,0.0004235568,0.0001826862,0.00024422957,0.000069192116,0.0008586494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048290743,0.00012005173,0.000055012802,0.00040083507,0.000076565135,0.000803606,0.00002175459,0.00017817908,0.00018669562],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008712814,0.00010350566,0.029636655,0.002419985,0.00008128858,0.000014436834,0.0040820898,0.0000049145715,0.000038525766,0.6256967,0.28683674,0.0510764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019198557,0.000010733948,0.00020977596,0.0019047424,0.000021163429,7.262717e-7,0.00021933793,0.000023531118,0.0000051315947,0.0006033817,0.99663144,0.00017805061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9987789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96909606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020772086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010790537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9401609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}